alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001058624
<NAME> INTERACTIVE PERFORMANCE INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                       538
<INVENTORY>                                     42,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,205
<PP&E>                                          44,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,699
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,683
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with thisAmendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of The Pep Boys—Manny,Moe & Jack (the “Company”) for the year ended February 3, 2007,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”),

I, Jeffrey C. Rachor, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

(i)            The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)        The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Date: November 2, 2007 | /s/ JEFFREY  C. RACHOR              |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                        | Jeffrey C. Rachor                        |
|                        | *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
# C_2023174EN.01000301.xml

| 16.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10561 – CINTRA / ABERTIS / ITINERE / BIP & DRIVE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 174/02)

On 14 February 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M10561. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M10561. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>      5 
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
          FROM THE  BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENT
          OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE
          MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
          ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              323,642
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        16,277
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    346,646
<PP&E>                                              101,793
<DEPRECIATION>                                       22,574
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      526,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                51,830
<BONDS>                                             450,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                 41
<OTHER-SE>                                             (554)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        526,292
<SALES>                                              30,087
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     30,087
<CGS>                                                28,110
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        28,110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     18,604
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    5,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (22,164)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (22,164)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (22,164)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.55)

         

</TABLE>
EXEMPTIONREQUESTSANDEQUIVALENTLEVELOFSAFETY

Aerialpxl,LLCrequestsanexemptionfromthefollowing

regulationsaswellasanyadditionalregulationsthatmaytechnicallyapply

totheoperationoftheUASSystem:

14CFRPart21,AirworthinessCertificates

Thispartestablishestheproceduresfortheissuanceofanairworthiness

certificate.WhiletheFAAcontinuestoworktodevelopairworthiness

standardsforUnmannedAerialSystems,werequestanexperimental

certificatebeissuedfortheDJIInspire1undereither,orboth,ofthe

followingprovisions:

21.191Experimentalcertificates.Experimentalcertificatesareissuedforthe

followingpurposes:

(a)Researchanddevelopment.Testingnewaircraftdesignconcepts,

newaircraftequipment,newaircraftinstallations,newaircraftoperating

techniques,ornewusesforaircraft.

(b)Showingcompliancewithregulations.Conductingflighttestsand

otheroperationstoshowcompliancewiththeairworthinessregulations

includingflightstoshowcomplianceforissuanceoftypeandsupplemental

typecertificates,flightstosubstantiatemajordesignchanges,andflightsto

showcompliancewiththefunctionandreliabilityrequirementsofthe

regulations.

Sincetheexperimentalcertificatecanbeusedforcommercialpurposessuch

asmarketsurveys,salesdemonstrations,andcustomercrewtraining,we

wouldexpectthatanexperimentalcertificatewouldpermitourcommercial

purposeaswell.Theaircraftwillnotcarrypersonsorproperty,willnotcarry

fuel,andwillonlyflyunderstrictoperationalrequirements.Combinedwith

theUA'slightweight,beingconstructedprimarilyofcarbonfiberandplastic,

weproposethattheUAwillbeatleastassafe,ifnotsafer,thana

conventionallycertificatedaircraftperformingthesamemission.Ifan

experimentalairworthinesscertificateisnotappropriateforthisapplication,

thenwerequestanexemptionof14CFRPart21,SubpartH,andthe

requirementforanairworthinesscertificateingeneral,citingtheequivalent

levelofsafetyoutlinedinthepreviousparagraph.

14CFR45.23Displayofmarks;generaland45.29Sizeofmarks

Theseregulationsprovidethateachaircraftmustdisplay"N"andthe

aircraft'sregistrationnumberinlettersatleast3incheshigh.Additionally,

theaircraftmustdisplaytheword"EXPERIMENTAL"inlettersatleast2

incheshighneartheentrancetothecabin,cockpit,orpilotstation.TheUAS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3002 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3002

 To prohibit the receipt of Federal financial assistance by sanctuary 
                    cities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2015

 Mr. Barletta introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
    Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the receipt of Federal financial assistance by sanctuary 
                    cities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mobilizing Against Sanctuary Cities 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SANCTUARY CITIES INELIGIBLE FOR FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.

    Any State or local government that violates section 642 of the 
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 
U.S.C. 1373) may not receive any Federal financial assistance (as such 
term is defined in section 7501(a)(5) of title 31, United States Code). 
The Attorney General shall determine annually which State or local 
jurisdictions are not in compliance with section 642 of the Illegal 
Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act and shall report 
such determinations to Congress on March 1 of each year. The Attorney 
General shall also issue a report concerning the compliance of any 
particular State or local jurisdiction at the request of any Member of 
Congress. Any jurisdiction that is found to be out of compliance shall 
be ineligible to receive Federal financial assistance for a minimum 
period of one year, and shall only become eligible again after the 
Attorney General certifies that the jurisdiction is in compliance.
                                 <all>
```
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3130 

To protect victims of stalking from gun violence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2015 

Mrs. DINGELL (for herself and Mr. DOLD) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To protect victims of stalking from gun violence. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Zero Tolerance for Do5 mestic Abusers Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADDITION OF DATING PARTNERS AND INDIVIDUALS 

7 SUBJECT TO RESTRAINING ORDERS. 

8 (a) DEFINITION.—Section 921(a) of title 18, United 

9 States Code, is amended— 

10 (1) by striking paragraph (32) and inserting 

11 the following: 

12 ‘‘(32) The term ‘intimate partner’— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3130 IH

1 ‘‘(A) means with respect to a person, the spouse 

2 of the person, a former spouse of the person, an in3 dividual who is a parent of a child of the person, and 

4 an individual who cohabitates or has cohabited with 

5 the person; and 

6 ‘‘(B) includes— 

7 ‘‘(i) a dating partner (as defined in section 

8 2266); and 

9 ‘‘(ii) any other person similarly situated to 

10 a spouse who is protected by the domestic or 

11 family violence laws of the State or tribal juris12 diction in which the injury occurred or where 

13 the victim resides.’’; and 

14 (2) in paragraph (33)(A)(ii)— 

15 (A) by inserting ‘‘intimate partner,’’ after 

16 ‘‘former spouse,’’; and 

17 (B) by inserting ‘‘intimate partner,’’ after 

18 ‘‘a spouse,’’ each place it appears. 

19 (b) ADDITION OF STALKING.—Section 922 of title 

20 18, United States Code, is amended— 

21 (1) in subsection (d)— 

22 (A) in paragraph (8)(ii), by striking ‘‘or’’ 

23 at the end; 

24 (B) in paragraph (9), by striking the pe25 riod at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3130 IH

1 (C) by inserting after paragraph (9) the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(10) has been convicted in any court of a mis4 demeanor crime of stalking.’’; and 

5 (2) in subsection (g)— 

6 (A) in paragraph (8)(C)(ii), by striking 

7 ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

8 (B) in paragraph (9), by striking the 

9 comma at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

10 (C) by inserting after paragraph (9) the 

11 following: 

12 ‘‘(10) has been convicted in any court of a mis13 demeanor crime of stalking,’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Surface Transportation Board

          - [Docket No. EP 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2024-4)]

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board.

# ACTION:

Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

# SUMMARY:

The Surface Transportation Board has adopted the fourth quarter 2024 Rail Cost Adjustment Factor and cost index filed by the Association of American Railroads.

# DATES:

*Applicability Date:*                         October 1, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245-0333. If you require an accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act, please call (202) 245-0245.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The rail cost adjustment factor (RCAF) is an index formulated to represent changes in railroad costs incurred by the nation's largest railroads over a specified period of time. The Surface Transportation Board (Board) is required by law to publish the RCAF on at least a quarterly basis. Each quarter, the Association of American Railroads computes three types of RCAF figures and submits those figures to the Board for approval. The Board has reviewed the submission and adopts the RCAF figures for the fourth quarter of 2024. The fourth quarter 2024 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 0.961. The fourth quarter 2024 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.375. The fourth quarter 2024 RCAF-5 is 0.354. Additional information is contained in the Board's decision, which is available at                     *www.stb.gov.*

Decided: September 20, 2024.

By the Board, Board Members Fuchs, Hedlund, Primus, and Schultz.

Zantori Dickerson,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2024-21985 Filed 9-25-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-5057

_____________________________

B. Z. D., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Peter A. Mallory, Judge.

April 30, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Justin Karpf, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Ross, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOSE RICO-CARRILLO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-50355

D.C. No. 3:08-cr-00363-DMS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 29, 2010** 

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Jose Rico-Carrillo appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following

his guilty-plea conviction for attempted entry after deportation, in violation of

8 U.S.C. § 1326, and making a false claim to United States citizenship, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 911. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

JUL 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-50355

Rico-Carillo contends that the district court procedurally erred at sentencing

by failing to explicitly address his argument that the 16-level crime of violence

enhancement under the Sentencing Guidelines reflects unsound policy by the

Sentencing Commission because it is not tied by empirical research to any factor

relevant to sentencing. The record reflects that the district court considered RicoCarrillo’s arguments and did not procedurally err. See United States v. Carty, 520

F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1




October 30, 2017


Douglas W. Losordo
83 Carthage Road
Scarsdale, NY 10583


Dear Dr. Losordo,


This letter serves to modify certain terms and conditions of your employment with Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. (the “Company”), as set forth in that certain employment letter dated as of August 9, 2016, as amended on March 8, 2017 (the “Employment Letter”).


In consideration for your continued services to the Company, we are pleased to increase the target cash bonus for which you are eligible from 30% to 40%.  In addition, you will receive (i) a one-time cash payment in the amount of $165,000 (the “Cash Payment”) and (ii) a one-time grant of 49,182 shares of restricted common stock of the Company (the “Restricted Grant”).  One-third of the shares of such restricted common stock shall become fully vested upon the date of grant and the remaining two-thirds of the shares shall cease to be restricted and shall vest in two equal annual installments on the first and second anniversaries of the grant date.  You will be responsible for payment to the applicable taxing authority the federal, state, and local taxes that result due to the Cash Payment or the Restricted Grant.  


Other than as set forth above, the terms and conditions set forth in the Employment Letter shall remain in effect.


In signing this letter agreement and accepting our offer of continued employment, you certify your understanding that your employment will otherwise be on an at-will basis.




CALADRIUS BIOSICENCES, INC.




By:   /s/ David J. Mazzo______
Name: David J. Mazzo
Title: President & CEO
Date: 11-1-17






/s/ Douglas W. Losordo           _
Douglas W. Losordo, M.D.
Date: 10-30-17
#### Albert H. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ray HARDY, District Clerk of Harris County, Texas, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 76-2813

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 6, 1976.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Feb. 7, 1977.

Albert H. Carter, pro se.

Gus Drake, Anthony D. Sheppard, Asst. County Attys., Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellee.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and GEW-IN and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5 Cir., see *Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, et*al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Carter again sues under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking expungement of records of his 1963 and 1965 Texas bad-check convictions. *See Carter v. Hardy,*526 F.2d 314 (5th Cir. 1976). In the first suit he claimed that the convictions should be held constitutionally invalid because, he alleged, he had been indigent at the time of trial and had been denied counsel. We affirmed dismissal of the complaint on the ground that Carter had not alleged exceptional circumstances sufficient to invoke the court’s “exceedingly narrow scope” of power to order expunction of state conviction records, relying on *Rogers v. Slaughter,*469 F.2d 1084 (5th Cir. 1972).

The only difference between the instant case and Carter’s earlier suit is that this one challenges the constitutionality of the statute under which he was convicted, rather than of the procedures at trial. We do not think this difference is material, and therefore affirm the district court’s dismissal. *Hill v. Johnson,*539 F.2d 439 (5th Cir. 1976); *Carter v. Hardy, supra.*

AFFIRMED.