alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# SanJoaquin Valley AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

May 8,2007 Ms. Catherine Witherspoon Executive Officer California Air Resources Board 1001 "I" Street P.O. Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 95812 Dear Ms. Witherspoon: Enclosed is the State Implementation Plan (SIP) Package for the San Joaquin Valley UnifiedAir Pollution Control District (District) 2007 Ozone Plan. The District Governing Board adopted the 2007 Ozone Plan at a public hearing held on April 30, 2007. We request that the California Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit this plan and the appropriate documentation to the United States Enviror~mental Protection Agency (EPA) as a SIP revision. Included in this SIP Package are the following attachments: 

### I. ARB SIP Completeness Checklist 2. The 2007 Ozone Plan 3. Evidence of Public Hearing 4. Governing Board Resolution Adopting the 2007 Ozone Plan 5. Governing Board Resolution Enhancing SIP-Creditability for Incentive Programs 

### 6. Public Comments and Responses 7. Additional Materials (Governing Board Report, Initial Study for CEQA) Ifyou have any questions regarding this plan, please contact Donald Hunsaker by email at 

### Donald.Hunsaker@vallevair.orgor at (559) 230-5800. The District thanks you and your staff for your assistance. Sincerely,

~cott Nester Director of Planning

Attachments
cc: J. Lindberg Seyed Sadredin Executive DirectorIAir Pollution Control Officer
Northern Region Central Region(MainOffice) Southern Region 4800 Enterprise Way 1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue 2700 M Street, Suite275 Modesto, CA 95356-8718 Fresno, CA 93726-0244 Bakersfield, CA 93301-2373 Tel: (209)557-6400 FAX: (209)557-6475 Tel: (559)230-6000 FAX: (559)230-6061 Tel: (661)326-6900 FAX: (661)326-6985 www.valleyair.org Printed on recycled paper 3
#### BYRD v. STATE.

No. 16119.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 14, 1934.

Emmet Thornton arid A. H. Mount, both of Sulphur Springs, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Appellant is charged by an indictment containing two counts. The first count charges that he “did then and there unlawfully possess for the purpose of sale liquor capable of producing intoxication.” In the second count it is charged that he “did then and there unlawfully transport liquor capable of produc*135ing intoxication.” The conviction is based upon the second count.

Due to changes in the Constitution and in the statutory law of the state upon the subject upon which the prosecution is founded, we are constrained to hold that the indictment is inadequate to support the conviction. The reason for this conclusion is set forth in the opinion on motion for rehearing in Bob Offield v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 75 S.W.(2d) 882, delivered October 81, 1934, not yet reported [in State Report], Other decisions to the same effect are of record. Among them is Bob Hilterbrand v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 75 S.W.(2d) 884, not yet reported [in State Report],

*For the*reasons stated,,the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
# C_2023131EN.01000701.xml

| 14.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/7

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.104762

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 131/06)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 31.1.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.104762 |
| Member State | Romania |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Set-up of the Investment and Development Bank |
| Legal basis | Law no 207/2022 and Government Decision no. 1204/2022 |
| Type of measure | Ad Hoc Case |
| Objective | Sectorial development |
| Form of aid | Direct grant, Guarantee, Other forms of equity intervention |
| Budget | Overall budget: 7 906 800 000 RON |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | 31.1.2023 — 31.12.2027 |
| Economic sectors | Financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministry of Finance |
| 16 Libertății Blvd., 050706 Bucharest |

Date of adoption of the decision

31.1.2023

Aid number

SA.104762

Member State

Romania

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Set-up of the Investment and Development Bank

Legal basis

Law no 207/2022 and Government Decision no. 1204/2022

Type of measure

Ad Hoc Case

Objective

Sectorial development

Form of aid

Direct grant, Guarantee, Other forms of equity intervention

Budget

Overall budget: 7 906 800 000 RON

Intensity

Duration

31.1.2023 — 31.12.2027

Economic sectors

Financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministry of Finance

16 Libertății Blvd., 050706 Bucharest

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
# C_2023065EN.01000401.xml

| 22.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/4

---

DECISION TO CLOSE THE FORMAL INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE AFTER WITHDRAWAL BY MEMBER STATE

State aid – Poland

(Articles 107 to 109 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)

Commission notice pursuant to Article 108(2) of the TFEU – withdrawal of notification

SA.46981 2018/C (ex 2016/N) – Poland – Flat rate sales tax in shipbuilding sector

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 65/03)

The Commission has decided to close the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) of the TFEU, initiated on 15 January 2018 (1) in respect of the measure referred to above, recording that Poland has withdrawn its notification on 23 March 2021 and will not pursue this aid project further.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 2.3.2018, p. 9.

---
ex_97453.htm


Exhibit 4.13


 


HOVERINK BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC. 


 


EIN# 46-3590875


 


 


 


BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION TO GRANT RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT 


AWARDS TO EXECUTIVES, BOARD MEMBERS AND CONSULTANTS


 


Upon a duly made, seconded and unanimously adopted consent, the Board of Directors of HOVERINK BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC adopted the following resolution it is hereby:


 


RESOLVED that, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of HOVERINK BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC a Delaware Corporation (the “Company”), has determined that the grant of Restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock to DEBBIE MAE CARTER. as an effective means to align management interest with stockholder interests;


 


IT IS RESOLVED that, the following restricted shares are hereby granted


 


	
			Name of Grantee 

				Class of Stock	Number of Shares Granted 	Amount Vested 	
			Par Value

			
	
			 DEBBIE MAE CARTER

				
			Common

				
			6,800,000

				
			6,800,000

				
			$.0001

			
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
			Total Shares Granted

				 	
			6,800,000

				
			 

				 



 


 


The undersigned, Debbie Carter, certifies that I am the duly appointed Chief Executive Officer of HOVERINK BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC and that the above is a true and correct copy of resolutions duly adopted at a meeting of the directors thereof, convened and held in accordance with law and the Bylaws of HOVERINK BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC and that such resolution is now in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have affixed my name as Secretary of HOVERINK BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC and have attached the seal of HOVERINK BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC to this resolution.


 


Dated The     Day Of


 


                                                         


Debbie Carter,


Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(A)
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report dated February 23, 1996, included herein, into Pennzoil Company's
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 Nos. 2-67268, 2-76935,
2-95869, 33-24261, 33-40192, 33-51473, 33-53783 and 33-63384 and on Form S-3
Nos. 33-50029 and 33-50953.
 
                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Houston, Texas
February 27, 1996
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION





Washington, D.C.  20549





---------------------------------





FORM 8-K





---------------------------------





CURRENT REPORT





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  November 22, 2013





FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





INDIANA


(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)





0-17071


(Commission File Number)





35-1544218


(IRS Employer Identification No.)





200 East Jackson Street


Muncie, Indiana


(Address of principal executive offices)





47305-2814


(Zip Code)





Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (765) 747-1500





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





---







Item 8.01 .  Other Events .





On November 22, 2013, First Merchants Corporation (the “Company”) redeemed the final 34,043 shares of its Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) held by the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) at an aggregate redemption price of $34,043,000, plus accrued but unpaid dividends.  The Series B Preferred Stock wa s issued to the Treasury in September of 2011 as part of the Company’s participation in the Small Business Lending Fund Program.  Following the redemption, there are no shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding.














SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly cau sed this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DATE: November 22, 2013





FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION





By: /s/ Mark K. Hardwick


Mark K. Hardwick,


Executive Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer
# C_2022201EN.01000101.xml

| 18.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10682 – VALEO / VSEA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 201/01)

On 11 May 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10682. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10682. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2015-2466 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2015-CE-018-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



As adopted pursuant to



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Quarterly Report of Park Bancorp, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 11, 2005, (the Report), I, Steven J. Pokrak, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:



| | (3) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Steven J. PokrakSteven J. PokrakTreasurer and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 11, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7384

KEITH PRESTWOOD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

J. R. HUNT,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-96-564-5-H-3)

Submitted: October 29, 1996 Decided: December 10, 1996

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Prestwood, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994),

amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,

Pub. L. No. 104-132 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the

reasoning of the district court. Prestwood v. Hunt, No. CA-96-564-

5-H-3 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                    PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                   Exhibit 12

COMPUTATION OF TOTAL DEBT TO TOTAL CAPITALIZATION
($ in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       December 31,
                                                     ----------------------------------------------
                                                        2002                2001             2000
                                                     ----------           -------           -------
                                                                                 As Restated*
                                                                          -------------------------
<S>                                                  <C>                  <C>               <C>
Short-term debt ..............................       $     35.2              59.3             518.2

Current portion of long-term debt ............            127.0             274.0             206.5

Long-term debt ...............................          1,948.4           2,538.3           1,963.0
                                                     ----------           -------           -------

   Total debt ................................          2,110.6           2,871.6           2,687.7

Minority interests in subsidiaries ...........             65.3              61.3              92.9

Common shareholders' equity ..................          2,813.6           2,730.1           3,184.4
                                                     ----------           -------           -------

   Total capitalization ......................       $  4,989.5           5,663.0           5,965.0
                                                     ==========           =======           =======

Ratio of total debt to total capitalization...             42.3%             50.7%             45.1%
                                                     ==========           =======           =======
</TABLE>

*    Refer to Note 22, Restatement to Consolidated Financial Statements, to the
     Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-K.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         202,000
<SECURITIES>                                    10,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,307,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (290,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,214,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,443,000
<PP&E>                                      22,927,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (19,941,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,429,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,586,000
<BONDS>                                      1,554,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  (344,000)
<COMMON>                                     3,382,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,749,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,429,000
<SALES>                                     16,288,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,288,000
<CGS>                                       16,060,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,060,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,778,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             278,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (89,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,739,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022395EN.01001101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 14.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/11 |

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 395/10)

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Sweden |
| Concerned routes | | | | | --- | --- | | | Arvidsjaur–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Gällivare–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Hagfors–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Hemavan–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Kramfors-Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Lycksele–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Pajala–Luleå | | | | | --- | --- | | | Sveg–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Torsby–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Vilhelmina–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Östersund–Umeå | | | | | --- | --- | | | Mora – Stockholm/Arlanda | |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 27 October 2023 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the modified public service obligations can be obtained | For further information please contact: | | | --- | | The Swedish Transport Administration | | 781 87 Borlänge | | SWEDEN | Tel. 0771 921921 Int. +46 771921921 Contact person: Lisa Berglund Email: lisa.a.berglund@trafikverket.se Website : www.trafikverket.se |

---