alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Precision Castparts Corp. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, William D. Larsson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 29, 2008



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ WILLIAM D. LARSSON                                              
|William D. Larsson Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### HARRIS v. STATE.

No. 14036.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 14, 1931.

M. E. Gates, of Huntsville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, J.

The offense is manufacturing intoxicating liquor; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The judgment sentence, notice of appeal, and recognizance do not appear to have been, entered in the minutes of the court. Hence it becomes our duty to order a dismissal.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
# C_2023154EN.01000301.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11027 – HSBC / AXA / INTU MILTON KEYNES)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 154/03)

On 25 April 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11027 . EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11027 . EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2022431EN.01002401.xml

| 14.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/24

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10859 – TRAFIGURA / ECOBAT RESOURCES STOLBERG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 431/07)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Trafigura Group Pte Limited (‘Trafigura’, Singapore), |
| --- | --- |

—

Trafigura Group Pte Limited (‘Trafigura’, Singapore),

| — | Ecobat Resources Stolberg GmbH (‘ERS’, Germany), currently controlled by Ecobat LLC (‘Ecobat’, Germany). |
| --- | --- |

—

Ecobat Resources Stolberg GmbH (‘ERS’, Germany), currently controlled by Ecobat LLC (‘Ecobat’, Germany).

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

Trafigura will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of ERS.

2.

| — | Trafigura is an independent commodity trader, specialising in the oil, minerals and metals markets at global level, |
| --- | --- |

—

Trafigura is an independent commodity trader, specialising in the oil, minerals and metals markets at global level,

| — | ERS owns a lead smelting facility in Stolberg, Germany that produces lead metal, as well as other base and precious metals including doré silver and sulphuric acid, recovered as by-products of the lead smelting process. |
| --- | --- |

—

ERS owns a lead smelting facility in Stolberg, Germany that produces lead metal, as well as other base and precious metals including doré silver and sulphuric acid, recovered as by-products of the lead smelting process.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10859 – TRAFIGURA / ECOBAT RESOURCES STOLBERG

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Charles M. Stivers, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q of Kentucky
      USA Energy, Inc. ,
      for the
      fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of Kentucky
      USA Energy, Inc..





Date:
                October 2, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Charles M. StiversCharles
                M. StiversInterim
                Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.B****CERTIFICATION**I, John R. Sult, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Southern Natural Gas Company;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:February 28, 2007       */s/ John R. Sult* John R. SultSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andController(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
---

|Exhibit 32.2                                 
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350                       
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tecton Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: September 19, 2007 | /s/
      Bruno Weiss               
|------------------------- | ------------------------------------
|                          | Bruno Weiss, Chief Financial Officer

---
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 08

- 00133

- CV

ROBERT WALTON

, Appellant

v.

ROBERT RUTLEDGE

, Appellee

From the 414th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006

- 543

- 5

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed a motion to di smiss this appeal. Appellee has not filed a

response. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

FELIPE REYNA

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Vance, and

Justice Reyna

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed Se ptember 17, 2008

[CV06]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 903 South 4th Street, RML 31/3118, Hamilton, MT 59840 (Video Assisted Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kristin L. McNally, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 903 South 4th Street, RML 31/3118, Hamilton, MT 59840,                         *mcnallyk@niaid.nih.gov*.                    
      ( print page 78322)    
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 19, 2024.

Lauren A. Fleck,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-21863 Filed 9-24-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### CITY OF BEAUMONT v. GIBBS et ux.

No. 3580.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

June 22, 1939.

Geo. E. Murphy, City Atty., and E. B. Votaw, Asst. City Atty., both of Beaumont, for appellant.

O. M. Lord and J. A. Veillon, both of Beaumont, for appellees.

WALKER, Chief Justice.

Alleging that appellee, C. G. Gibbs, had certain of his improvements in Evalon Street, within its corporate limits, appellant, City of Beaumont, filed this suit against him, praying for a mandatory injunction compelling him to move his improvements out of the street; pending a hearing on the merits, appellant prayed for a temporary mandatory injunction granting it the relief prayed for on final hearing. On a hearing, of which all parties had due notice, after due submission on the pleading and evidence, the court denied appellant’s prayer for a temporary mandatory *873injunction. From that order it has duly perfected its appeal to this court.

 By his answer under oath, appel-lee denied that his improvements were in Evalon Street; in further answer he plead certain affirmative defenses. He had been in quiet and peaceable possession of the premises in controversy for more than twenty years. Pn the following proposition of law from 24 Tex.Jur. 141, Sec. 100, Injunctions, the prayer for the temporary mandatory injunction was correctly refused: “A peaceable but disputed possession of property will not be transfered by temporary injunction.” See, also, Secs. 99 and 101.

It follows that the judgment of the lower court should be affirmed, and it is accordingly so ordered.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5                                                        EXHIBIT 27.1
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FROM FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 (FOR SEC
USE ONLY) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       5,832,577
<SECURITIES>                                23,094,652
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,736,901
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (473,350)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,691,326
<PP&E>                                       6,117,506
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,822,180)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,241,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,710,001
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        84,814
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,131,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,241,428
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,267,626
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,129,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,907,653
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (39,655)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,537,035
<INCOME-TAX>                                   887,962
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,649,073
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,649,073
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        

</TABLE>
#### MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. MORENO.

No. 2639.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Oct. 4, 1934.

R. H. Mercer, of San Antonio, for appellant.

T. H. Miller, of George West, for appellee.

COMBS, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment of the county court of Live Oak county, in favor of ap-pellee, Elidió Moreno, and against the appellant, Maryland Casualty Company, awarding compensation in the amount of $324.50 under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The judgment was by default. There is no statement of facts and no brief for appellee.

Appellant’s assignment that the judgment-of the trial court in favor of appellee is without support in the pleadings must be sustained. Erom the transcript it appears that the appellant filed this suit to set aside an award of the Industrial Accident Board in favor of the appellee for the same amount for which the judgment was rendered. By his first amended answer, upon which the case was tried, appellee interposed a general demurrer, a specific denial of certain allegations in appellant’s pleadings, and prayed for judgment for $324.50, “the full sum of the award of the Industrial Accident Board.” Other than the prayer there is no hint'of a cross-action of any kind.

Under the statutes, article 8307, § 5, Rev. St. (as amended by Acts of the 42d Leg., e. 224, p. 378 [Vernon's Ann. Civ. St. art. 8307, § 5]), a suit to set aside the award of the Industrial Accident Board requires a trial de novo for the determination of the iasues involved “and the burden of proof shall be upon the party claiming compensation.” It was therefore necessary for the plaintiff, by appropriate pleadings, to allege facts entitling him to the judgment which he obtained. This he did not do and the judgment was without any pleading to support it.

The case is reversed and remanded for a new trial.
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Raminder Badyal, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Kitcher Resources,
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
11th day of June, 2007.


/s/ Raminder Badyal
-----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer