alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **Variable Interest Entities (Tables)**   | 9 Months Ended                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
||
| **Variable Interest Entities [Abstract]** |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| Schedule of Maximum Potential Exposure    | First Commonwealth’s maximum potential exposure is equal to its carrying value and is summarized in the table below: September 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands)Low Income Housing Limited Partnership Investments$239 $347 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Schedule of maximum potential exposure.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**fcf_ScheduleOfMaximumPotentialExposureTableTextBlock**Namespace Prefix:**fcf_**Data Type:**nonnum:textBlockItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**fcf_VariableInterestEntitiesAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**fcf_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00246

- CV

Anselma RODRIGUEZ , Norma Rodriguez, Amadora R. Mariscal,

Homero Rodriguez, and Elisa R. Alaniz,

Appellants

v.

Arturo RODRIGUEZ , Santos R. Olmeda, Pablo Rodriguez, Jr., David Rodriguez, Elva R.

Smith, Children of Alberto Rodriguez (deceased), Alberto Rodriguez, Jr.,

Nadia Rodriguez, and Manuel Rodriguez,

Appellees

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC

- 09

- 538

Honorable Baldemar Garza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellees rec over their costs of this appeal from appellants.

SIGNED May 6, 2020.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
AUDITOR'S REPORT

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of ASE Advanced
Systems Europe B.V. at Eindhoven as of 31 December 1996, and the related
consolidated statement of operations, changes in shareholders' equity and cash
flow for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of ASE Advanced
Systems Europe B.V. as of 31 December 1996 and of their operations and their
cash flow for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.

Nieuwegein, 19 February 1997

EshuisBlomer,
Auditors,


E.J.C. Boersen RA
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of China RuiTai International Holdings Co, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), I, Dian Min Ma, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  April 15, 2009 /s/Dian Min Ma     Chief Executive Officer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GENBAO GAO,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

STATE OF HAWAII, DEPARTMENT

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 10-15311

D.C. No. 1:09-cv-00478-DAEBMK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

David Alan Ezra, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Genbao Gao appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

action alleging employment discrimination and retaliation. We have jurisdiction

FILED

MAR 25 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-15311

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. Civish,

382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Gao’s claims raised in his first Equal

Employment and Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) proceeding because he filed

this action more than ninety days after receipt of the right to sue letter. See 42

U.S.C. § 2000e-16(c); Edwards v. Occidental Chem. Corp., 892 F.2d 1442, 1445

(9th Cir. 1990) (“An action brought under Title VII must be filed within ninety

days of receipt of a right to sue letter from the EEOC or appropriate state

agency.”).

The district court properly dismissed the discrimination claim because Gao

failed to allege facts sufficient to state a claim for relief. See also Abagninin v.

AMVAC Chem. Corp., 545 F.3d 733, 742 (9th Cir. 2008) (conclusory allegations of

law are insufficient to defeat a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim); see

also Vasquez v. Cnty. of Los Angeles, 349 F.3d 634, 646 (9th Cir. 2003)

(discussing the three prongs for a prima facie case of Title VII discrimination).

The district court properly dismissed Gao’s retaliation claim because Gao

failed to allege facts showing that he was terminated because he engaged in a

protected activity. See Learned v. City of Bellevue, 860 F.2d 928, 932-33 (9th Cir.
3 10-15311

1988) (Title VII protects only those employees who claim retaliation resulting

from their opposition to discrimination under Title VII). 

The district court also properly dismissed the Title VI claim because Gao did

not establish that the Hawaii Attorney General’s Office’s primary objective was to

provide employment. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000d.

The district court properly dismissed Gao’s Americans with Disabilities Act

(“ADA”) claim on Eleventh Amendment grounds. See Bd. of Trs. of the Univ. of

Ala. v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 360 (2001) (holding that states are immune from

private suits brought in federal court under Title I of the ADA).

Gao’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,425
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,303
<INVENTORY>                                     79,423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,753
<PP&E>                                           8,471
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,349
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 149,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,060
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,104
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   149,052
<SALES>                                         64,277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,277
<CGS>                                           52,413
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    58
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,708)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,391)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,317)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,317)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.46)


</TABLE>
# C_2022101EN.01000401.xml

| 1.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/4

---

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/337, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/336 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2022/C 101/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/337 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/336 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons, entities and bodies should be included in the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for the designation of those persons, entities and bodies appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons, entities and bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address before 1 June 2022:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 59, 28.2.2022, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(4)  OJ L 58, 28.2.2022, p. 1.

---
# Exhibit 11

# Computation of Net Income Per Common Share

|                                           | December 31
|------------------------------------------ | -----------
|
|Net Income(Loss)                           |            
|                                           |            
|Weighted Average of Common                 |            
|Shares Outstanding                         |            
|Dilutive Effect of Stock Option            |            
|                                           |            
|                                           |            
|                                           |            
|Basic Net Income(Loss) Per Common Share    |            
|                                           |            
|Dilutive Net Income(Loss) Per Common Share |            
|                                           |            

|(1) | Dilutive effect of stock options is 38,428 however, because of the loss, the
effect is antidilutive and not used.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

38

---
# C_2022315EN.01000301.xml

| 19.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/3

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 315/03)

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Limoges – Paris (Orly) |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 4 March 2023 to 3 March 2027 |
| Deadline for the submission of applications and tenders | 27 October 2022, (12.00 Paris time) |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Syndicat Mixte de l’Aéroport de Limoges-Bellegarde |
| 81 avenue de l’aéroport |
| 87100 Limoges |

Member State

France

Route concerned

Limoges – Paris (Orly)

Period of validity of the contract

From 4 March 2023 to 3 March 2027

Deadline for the submission of applications and tenders

27 October 2022, (12.00 Paris time)

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Syndicat Mixte de l’Aéroport de Limoges-Bellegarde

81 avenue de l’aéroport

87100 Limoges

Tel. +33 555433025

Email: direction@smalb-aeroport.fr

Or on the platform containing SMALB’s buyer profile: https://www.e-marchespublics.com

---
#### TREVINIO v. STATE.

No. 16043.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 25, 1933.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 20, 1933.

Duncan & Davis, of Gonzales, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary 'for four years.

The statement of facts does not appear to have been filed in the trial court. Hence it cannot be considered. The single bill of exception appearing in the record cannot be appraised in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
[No. 45308-4-I.

Division One.

October 23, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Edward Ford, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 99-1-01708-7, Carol A. Schapira, J., entered September 7, 1999. *Remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
# C_2023311EN.01000401.xml

| 1.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/4

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107565

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 311/03)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 24.7.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107565 |
| Member State | Greece |
| Region | Greece |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCTF -Aid to KTEL and KTEL SA bus companies and individual carriers operating unprofitable island routes due to the rise in diesel fuel prices |
| Legal basis | Article 120 of Law 5007/2022, (Official Gazette Α’ 241) aiming at providing emergency aid to urban and long-distance KTEL and KTEL S.A. bus companies, and to individual carriers serving non profitable island routes pursuant to the Presidential Decree 967/1979 due to the considerable rise in diesel fuel prices during 2022, and Joint Ministerial Decision No. 160387/2023 (Official Gazette B’ 3333) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 18 300 622 EUR
  Annual budget: 18 300 622 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Urban and suburban passenger land transport, Other passenger land transport n.e.c. |
| Name and address of the granting authority | GENERAL SECRETARIAT OF FISCAL POLICY, GENERAL SECRETARIAT OF TRANSPORT |
| 37, PANEPISTIMIOU Av., ATHENS — 2, ANASTASEOS STREET, PAPAGOS, ATHENS |

Date of adoption of the decision

24.7.2023

Aid number

SA.107565

Member State

Greece

Region

Greece

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCTF -Aid to KTEL and KTEL SA bus companies and individual carriers operating unprofitable island routes due to the rise in diesel fuel prices

Legal basis

Article 120 of Law 5007/2022, (Official Gazette Α’ 241) aiming at providing emergency aid to urban and long-distance KTEL and KTEL S.A. bus companies, and to individual carriers serving non profitable island routes pursuant to the Presidential Decree 967/1979 due to the considerable rise in diesel fuel prices during 2022, and Joint Ministerial Decision No. 160387/2023 (Official Gazette B’ 3333)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 18 300 622 EUR

Annual budget: 18 300 622 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Urban and suburban passenger land transport, Other passenger land transport n.e.c.

Name and address of the granting authority

GENERAL SECRETARIAT OF FISCAL POLICY, GENERAL SECRETARIAT OF TRANSPORT

37, PANEPISTIMIOU Av., ATHENS — 2, ANASTASEOS STREET, PAPAGOS, ATHENS

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA

---
Exhibit
      32.1








**Chief
      Executive Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Edward V. Lett, President and Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operation of the Company.









Date: August
                8, 2006
            /s/
                Edward V. LettEdward
                V. Lett
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to TIB Financial Corp. and will be retained
      by
      TIB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Xtreme Green Products Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sanford Leavitt, Chief Executive Officer, and Neil Roth, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1) This report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Sanford LeavittSanford LeavittChief Executive OfficerDate: Date: May 12, 2011





/s/ Neil RothNeil RothChief Financial OfficerDate: Date: May 12, 2011