alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022089EN.01001701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 25.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/17 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10614 – PAI PARTNERS / UVESCO)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 89/05)

1.

On 18 February 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022089EN.01001701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | PAI Partners SAS (‘PAI Partners’, France), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Uvesco S.A. (‘Uvesco’, Spain). |

PAI Partners will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Uvesco.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | PAI Partners is a private equity fund active in business services; food & consumer (including Refresco, Anguilas Aguinaga, Froneri, Tropicana, Naked, and Pumica); general industrials, and healthcare, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Uvesco is a Spanish retailer, active in the sale of daily consumer goods in supermarkets |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022089EN.01001701-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10614 – PAI PARTNERS / UVESCO

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022089EN.01001701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022089EN.01001701-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
# Official Journal C 295/18 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 295 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5118 November 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 295

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5118 November 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| | OLAF Supervisory Committee |
| 2008/C 295/01 | Activity Report of OLAF Supervisory Committee (June 2007 to May 2008) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

OLAF Supervisory Committee

2008/C 295/01

Activity Report of OLAF Supervisory Committee (June 2007 to May 2008)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2008/C 295/02 | Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

2008/C 295/02

Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover)

Note to the reader

s3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 28, 2011

h1219 

# Order

December 28, 2011

143020

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143020 COA: 302022 Wayne CC: 88-006691-FC VOL PARKER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 18, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
 ITEM 6. EXHIBITS


EXHIBIT-32





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Merchants Corporation (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2022, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael C. Rechin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





May 10, 2022


By:/s/ Mark K. HardwickMark K. HardwickChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)





A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to First Merchants Corporation and will be retained by First Merchants Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




















_____________________________________________________




















In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Merchants Corporation (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2022, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark K. Hardwick, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation, do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





May 10, 2022


By:/s/ Michele M. KawieckiMichele M. KawieckiExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)








A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to First Merchants Corporation and will be retained by First Merchants Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the quarter ended March 31,
2007 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership.
 By:
    /s/ Weston M. AndressWeston M. AndressPresident and Chief Financial Officer ofColonial Properties Trust, the general partner
of Colonial Realty Limited PartnershipMay 9, 2007 41
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                   5

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                  JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                                          9,151,004
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   3,552,311
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      489,000
<INVENTORY>                                                     4,371,705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               16,833,927
<PP&E>                                                          5,675,960
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  2,887,025
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 19,820,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           3,304,283
<BONDS>                                                            99,728
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                        5,999,344
<OTHER-SE>                                                     10,315,429
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   19,820,784
<SALES>                                                        13,123,479
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               13,123,479
<CGS>                                                           7,883,865
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   7,883,865
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               17,354,979
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                381,179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (12,021,431)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (12,021,431)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (12,021,431)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                        (.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        (.90)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3072 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3072

 To remove the authority of the Secretary of Energy to amend or issue 
           new energy efficiency standards for ceiling fans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 15, 2015

   Mr. Dent (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Rokita, Mr. Gosar, Mr. 
    Fleischmann, Mr. Rouzer, Mr. Joyce, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Murphy of 
Pennsylvania, and Mr. Pompeo) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To remove the authority of the Secretary of Energy to amend or issue 
           new energy efficiency standards for ceiling fans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CEILING FAN STANDARDS.

    Section 325(ff) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 
U.S.C. 6295(ff)) is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraphs (5) and (6); and
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (5).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001051794
<NAME>  Sherman Acquisition Corporation
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                       538
<INVENTORY>                                     42,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,205
<PP&E>                                          44,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,699
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,683
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023004EN.01000501.xml

| 6.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10880 – DUFRY / AUTOGRILL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 4/05)

On 20 December 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10880. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10880. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
----

| INDIANA                                        | 35-1544218                        |
|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

|   | o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| Exhibit 99.1 | Slide presentation, utilized July 28, 2011, during conference call and web cast by First Merchants Corporation |
|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

| 99.1 | Slide presentation, utilized July 28, 2011, during conference call and web cast by First Merchants Corporation |
|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Promulgation: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas EmissionsMeeting Documentation for Telephone Call on October12, 2010 with Arkema Representatives RegardingFluorinated Gas Production Re-Proposal RuleDates:October 12, 2010Staff Contact Information (Name, email, phone #):Deborah Ottinger, EPA, 202-343-9149,Ottinger.deborah@epa.gov; Karen Schaffner, RTI,ksschaffner@rti.orgName of Organization (Attach list of all attendees names and emails if possible):John Dege, Brad Martin, Suhas Mahuli, Paul Jahn, DuPontSummary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, reporting requirements, etc.):The purpose of the call was to discuss their public comments regarding emission estimation techniques available to calculate fluorinated GHGemissions along with other concerns regarding the reporting rule.DuPont representatives noted the following:•Most continuous process lines are single product however there are exceptions. Continuous processes are operated in “campaigns” wheredifferent products are made over time in the same equipment.A single continuous process line may make as many as 15 differentproducts. Additionally, many of their batch processes generatemultiple products. (The HON defines these as flexible operating units, andthe MON defines as a product or family of materials.) As an example, one production building contains continuous process equipmentused to make 2 different products, where each would be considered 2 separate processes. The majority of batch processes are used tomake multiple products. It was noted that the Pharmaceutical industry is unique, is not likely the chemical industry and perhaps is not thebest template. The MON approach is better where look at familyof materials. Often different grades of product may be made inthe sameequipment line, where raw materials are the same but the productshave different viscosity, etc. These would all be part of the sameprocess, but can often characterize emissions based on the worse-casescenario. [EPA noted that worse case is not best for this rule, butrather a best estimate is appropriate.] [EPA noted that facilities could characterize their emissions and where they vary significantly,capture that. In some cases, a separate operating scenario may need to be defined.]Use of calculations for determining emissions fromother operating scenarios makes sense, to adjust for things like other concentrations for other grades.•Participants asked about the rule schedule and signature since the rule is supposed to be in place for January 2011.DuPont noted their major comments:•CFC and HCFC are covered under the source category definition for subpart L, but the emissions only represent a small portion of theproduction. Including these compounds requires significant amount of effort for small emissions.•Strongly recommend that processes where neither the raw materialnor the products are F GHGsbe excluded from this subpart.•Strongly prefer engineering calculations to emissions testing.Written Comments Provided?No.Did they also submit to Docket?No.Date sent to EPA- CCDNone
Chelsea Bissell has petitioned for partial rehearing of this Court's June 30, 2020 Order

granting her admission to active status in the State Bar of Montana. This Court ordered that

Bissell provide proof of attendance, within six months, at 15 hours of approved Continuing

Legal Education (CLE) to be credited to the tirne she was on inactive status.

Bissell asks this Court to reconsider that part of the Order which required her to

complete CLE credits. Bissell points out that she was admitted to the Montana Bar in June

2019 as an inactive member and petitioned for active status in June 2020. Under Rule 4(F)(3)

of the Montana Rules for Legal Education, an active member of the Montana Bar is exempt

from the CLE requirement during the balance of the reporting year during which she is

adrnitted. Bissell therefore argues that she has no CLE requirernents to fulfill for the year she

was on inactive status.

The Court agrees that Bissell is not required to fulfill CLE requirements for her year of

inactive status as it was her first year admitted to the Montana Bar.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that upon payment of the appropriate fees to the State

Bar of Montana, Petitioner shall be admitted to the active practice of law.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to Petitioner and to the State Bar of

Montana. 

(-Om

DATED this day of September, 2020.

For the Court,

Chief Justice
December 1 , 2016

Mr. Austin Hilgenberg
1695 Hunter Drive Wayzata, MN 55391

Re: FAA

- 2015

- 8663

Dear Mr. Hilgenberg :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and
have determined that we will cont inue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016 , letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we are reviewing pending Secti on 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your requ est. We have determined that your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary o f your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,
/s/ Dan Ngo Program Analyst