UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

# ccv REGION Ill 1650 Arch street PhiladelphiaJ Pennsylvania 19103-2029

Mr. David Paylor, Director Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality 629 East Main Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Dear Mr. Paylor: 

### AUG 1- 

### . 3

### 2013

On July 29,2013, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality pertaining to the definition of "regulated NSRpollutant" under 9VAC5-80-1615. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) action. ' Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Mr. David Talley, Office of Permits and Air Toxics, at (215) 814-2117, or at talley.david@epa.gov. He is the principal contact for this rulemaking. Sincerely

.

# 4r**~~ /.~**  'I

### CZ'v\~0'**'~~** 

# ,, Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division



## 0 Printed on 100% recycled/recyclablepaper with 100%post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free. Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V) SIP Submitted by: Virginia Date Submitted: 7/25/13 Subject: Revision A13- Revision to 9V ACS-80-1615
Completeness Review Completed by: David Talley Date Completed: 8/7/13 Administrative Materials

---- 

# I EPA REQUIREMENT 1. A formal letter ofsubmittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval ofthe plan or revision hereof. 

# I STATE SUBMITTAL 

### 1. Letter to Diana Esher from Director PaylorACCEPTABLE 

# I (X) 

# I

p2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code 2. Included. Adopted 4/22/13. Effective 5/22/13. 

### p- or body ofregulations; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date ofadoption or final issuance as well as the effective date ofthe plan, ifdifferent from the adoption/issuance date. 3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority 3. Included. under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 

### p4. A copy ofactual regulation, or document submitted for 4. Included. approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including 

### p-

·ndication ofthe changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy ofthe official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date ofthe regulation/document**shall~** whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself.

### EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X) 5. Evidence that the State followed all ofthe procedural 5. Included. equirements ofthe State's laws and constitution in conducting**~** and completing the adoption/issuance ofthe plan. 6. Evidence that public notice was given ofthe proposed 6. VA Register ofRegulations included**~** !Change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including !the date ofpublication of such notice. 

# l7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance 7. Included. twith the information provided in the public notice and the**~** State's laws and constitution, ifapplicable. 8. Compilation ofpublic comments and the State's response 8. No public comments received.**~** hereto.

Technical Sunnort

### EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X) 1. Identification ofall regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. PMz.s**~** Q. Identification ofthe locations ofaffected sources including 2. Statewide I he EPA attainment/nonattainment designation ofthe locations**~** and the status ofthe attainmentplan for the affected area(s). 3. Quantification ofthe changes in plan allowable emissions 3. N/A from the affected sources; estimates ofchanges in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate,**~** quantification ofchanges in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations ofthe differences between certain**~aseline** levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result I !Ofthe revision. 

## f4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air 4. N/A**~** quality standards, prevention ofsignificant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and

-•'

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X) visibility, as applicable, are protected ifthe plan is approved and implemented. 5. Modeling information required to support the proposed 5. N/A revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, 

### p- Dustification for use ofoffsite data (where used), modes of !models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to**~he** determination ofadequacy ofthe modeling analysis.**~·Evidence,** where necessary, that emission limitations are 

### 6. NIA I !based on continuous emission reduction technology. 17

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work 7. N/A !Practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, 

### p- !Where necessary, to ens:ure emission levels. 8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how 8. N/A !compliance will be determined in practice. 

### p9. Special economic and technologicaljustifications required 9.N/A lby any applicable EPA policies. (Ifa policy is not appropriate, 

### p-**~xplain** why.) 10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a 10. N/A maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant 

### pNAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation.