alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CAMERON v. STATE.

No. 16421.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 21, 1934.

R. C. Cameron, in pro. per.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is passing a forged instrument; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for six years. .

The indictment embraced two counts, one charging appellant with knowingly and fraudulently passing as true a forged instrument in writing, and the other averring that he attempted to pass the forged instrument described therein. The charge of the court defined “forgery” and advised the jury to convict appellant if they believed beyond a reasonable doubt that, with intent to defraud and without lawful authority, he falsely made the instrument in writing described in the indictment. The jury were instructed that the penalty for. forgery was not less than two nor more than seven years. Nowhere in the charge was the law applicable to passing forged instruments submitted to the jury. The verdict of the jury recited that appellant was found guilty as charged, and that his punishment was assessed at a term of six years’ confinement in the penitentiary. The judgment of the court recited that appellant was guilty of the offense of passing a forged instrument, and condemned him to confinement in the penitentiary for a term of -six years. The sentence followed the judgment.

Appellant was not represented by, counsel. He filed a motion for a new trial over his own *500signature setting up, in effect, that, notwithstanding the indictment charged him with passing a forged instrument, the charge of the court submitted the law of forgery. Manifestly the motion for a new trial should have been granted. Under the charge embraced in the indictment, the jury were not warranted in assessing a punishment in excess of five years. The punishment for passing or attempting to pass a forged instrument is not less than two nor more than five years’ confinement in the penitentiary. Article 996, P. O. As pointed out, the punishment assessed by the jury was six *years.*In submitting an offense not embraced in the indictment, the trial court committed an error which resulted in the assessment of a penalty not authorized by the statute denouncing the offenses of passing or attempting to pass forged instruments.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Representative.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Trade Representative has determined not to list any countries as denying fair market opportunities for U.S. products, suppliers, or bidders in foreign government-funded airport construction projects.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kate Psillos, Deputy Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for WTO and Multilateral Affairs,                         *Kathryn.W.Psillos@ustr.eop.gov*                         or 202.395.9581, or Edward Marcus, Assistant General Counsel,                         *Edward.D.Marcus@ustr.eop.gov*                         or 202.395.0448.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 533 of the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, as amended by section 115 of the Airport and Airway Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1987, Public Law 100-223 (codified at 49 U.S.C. 50104), requires the U.S. Trade Representative to decide whether any foreign country has denied fair market opportunities to U.S. products, suppliers, or bidders in connection with airport construction projects of $500,000 or more that are funded in whole or in part by the government of such country. The Office of the United States Trade Representative has not received any complaints or other information indicating that U.S. products, suppliers, or bidders are being denied fair market opportunities in such airport construction projects. As a consequence, the U.S. Trade Representative has decided not to list any countries as denying fair market opportunities for U.S. products, suppliers, or bidders in foreign government-funded airport construction projects.

Jamila Thompson,

Chief of Staff, Office of the United States Trade Representative.

[FR Doc. 2024-21772 Filed 9-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3390-F4-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 59 (Friday, March 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16492-16493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07078]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9066]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Pleasure and Piety: The Art of Joachim Wtewael'' 
Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March

[[Page 16493]]

27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Pleasure and Piety: The Art of Joachim 
Wtewael,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, from on or about June 28, 
2015, until on or about October 4, 2015, at the Museum of Fine Arts, 
Houston, Houston, Texas, from on or about November 1, 2015, until on or 
about January 31, 2016, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including 
lists of the exhibit objects, contact the Office of Public Diplomacy 
and Public Affairs in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department 
of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email: section2459@state.gov). The 
mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: March 10, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-07078 Filed 3-26-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of SCPIE Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 7, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert B. Tschudy  
|                        |  |  |  | Robert B. Tschudy      
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2966 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2966

To amend the purposes of TANF to include reducing poverty by increasing 
             employment entry, retention, and advancement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2015

   Mr. Smith of Missouri (for himself and Mrs. Noem) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the purposes of TANF to include reducing poverty by increasing 
             employment entry, retention, and advancement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reducing Poverty through Employment 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSES OF THE TANF PROGRAM TO INCLUDE REDUCING POVERTY.

    Section 401(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 601(a)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) reduce poverty by increasing employment entry, 
        retention, and advancement.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall take effect on October 1, 
2015.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
UNAUDITED INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR BILLING
CONCEPTS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          75,997
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,636
<ALLOWANCES>                                       251
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               221,489
<PP&E>                                          27,191
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          168,860
<BONDS>                                          2,071
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           335
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   247,041
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,262
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,124
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,903
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,221
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,221
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
        

</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 269 

To prohibit certain real property from being named after a sitting Member 

of Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2015 

Mr. TURNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To prohibit certain real property from being named after 

a sitting Member of Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prohibiting Taxpayer5 Funded Monuments to Members of Congress Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON NAMING CERTAIN REAL PROP7 ERTY AFTER MEMBER OF CONGRESS. 

8 (a) PROHIBITION.—Real property under the jurisdic9 tion of the Federal Government, or constructed using Fed10 eral funds, shall not be named after, or otherwise officially 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 269 IH

1 identified by the name of, any individual who is a Member 

2 of Congress at the time the property is so named or identi3 fied. 

4 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

5 (1) The term ‘‘Member of Congress’’ includes a 

6 Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the Congress. 

7 (2) The term ‘‘real property’’ includes struc8 tures, buildings, or other infrastructure. 

9 (c) APPLICATION OF SECTION.—The prohibition in 

10 this section shall apply only with respect to real property 

11 named after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference inpost-effective amendment No. 1 to the RegistrationStatement onForm S-8(No. 333-63740) ofPowell Industries, Inc. of our report dated January 13,2006 relating to the financial statements, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report toShareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report onForm 10-K./s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLPHouston, TexasJanuary 13, 2006
# C_2022427EN.01002301.xml

| 9.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/23

---

EUROPEAN INNOVATION COUNCIL AND SMES EXECUTIVE AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2021

(2022/C 427/23)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://eismea.ec.europa.eu/about-eismea_en

---
Exhibit 12.02**CERTIFICATION**I, Hajime Ishizuka, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Pioneer Corporation (the “registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (and persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: July 7, 2006 /s/ Hajime Ishizuka     Hajime Ishizuka  Chief Financial Officer  Pioneer Corporation
# C_2023152EN.01000901.xml

| 28.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/9

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.106197

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 152/08)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 1.3.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.106197 |
| Member State | France |
| Region | France |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Dispositif de garanties aux établissements de crédits, sociétés de financement et entreprises d’assurance au titre des garanties exigées dans le cadre d’un contrat de fourniture de gaz ou d’électricité |
| Legal basis | Arrêté du 10 février 2023 fixant les modalités de fonctionnement du fonds chargé d'accorder des garanties aux établissements de crédit, sociétés de financement et entreprises d'assurance au titre des garanties exigées dans le cadre d'un contrat de fourniture de gaz ou d'électricité, en application de l'article 148 de la loi no 2022-1726 du 30 décembre 2022 de finances pour 2023 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Guarantee |
| Budget | Overall budget: 2 000 000 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 2 000 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique |
| 139 rue de Bercy |

Date of adoption of the decision

1.3.2023

Aid number

SA.106197

Member State

France

Region

France

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Dispositif de garanties aux établissements de crédits, sociétés de financement et entreprises d’assurance au titre des garanties exigées dans le cadre d’un contrat de fourniture de gaz ou d’électricité

Legal basis

Arrêté du 10 février 2023 fixant les modalités de fonctionnement du fonds chargé d'accorder des garanties aux établissements de crédit, sociétés de financement et entreprises d'assurance au titre des garanties exigées dans le cadre d'un contrat de fourniture de gaz ou d'électricité, en application de l'article 148 de la loi no 2022-1726 du 30 décembre 2022 de finances pour 2023

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Guarantee

Budget

Overall budget: 2 000 000 000 EUR

Annual budget: 2 000 000 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique

139 rue de Bercy

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
#### MILLER v. WOOD et al.

No. 4442.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.

July 1, 1935.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 9, 1935.

J. M. Elliott and Hamilton & Fitzgerald, all of Memphis, for appellant.

A. S. Moss and J. O. Fitzjarrald, both of Memphis, for appellees.

JACKSON, Justice.

The appellant instituted this suit in the district court of Hall county to recover damages alleged to have been caused to his land by drainage ditches constructed across their land by appellees which diverted the surface water from its natural flow across appellant’s land to his damage in the sum of $2,500.

The appellees answered by general and special exceptions, general denial, and pleaded that a former owner of the land, now deceased, had agreed to the construction of the ditches and the manner thereof.

At the conclusion of the evidence, the court peremptorily instructed a verdict for appellees, and of this appellant complains.

“It was reversible error for the court to direct a verdict: ‘If, discarding all adverse evidence, and giving credit to all evidence favorable to the plaintiff, and indulging every legitimate conclusion favorable to the plaintiff which might have been drawn from the facts proved, a jury might have found in favor of the plaintiff.’ Gross v. Shell Pipe Line Corp. (Tex. Civ. App.) 48 S.W.(2d) 377, 378, and authorities cited. To the same effect is Jones et al. v. Jones (Tex. Civ. App.) 41 S.W.(2d) 496, and authorities cited.” Jackson v. Langford (Tex. Civ. App.) 60 S.W.(2d) 265, 267.

We shall refrain from rehearsing the testimony and content ourselves by saying that in our opinion it.was amply sufficient, under the rule announced, to require the submission of the material issues involved in the controversy to the jury.

The record discloses that the appellant inherited the land alleged to have been damaged from his father, and it was with his deceased father that appellees claimed an oral agreement for the construction of *797the ditches said to have caused the damage. Appellee Wood was permitted, over appellant’s objections, to testify to such agreement. While no error is assigned to this action of the court, inasmuch as the judgment is reversed, we deem it proper to say that the objection to such testimony should have been sustained.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.