alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF APPLIED ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             625
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,779
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,667
<PP&E>                                          74,989
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,578
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,633
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,219
<SALES>                                         70,521
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,521
<CGS>                                           39,519
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,123
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (708)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,875)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,681)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,194)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.48)


</TABLE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
PECO Energy Company on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-31436, 33-59152, 33-49887,
33-43523, 33-54935, 333-27721), Form S-4 (File Nos. 33-53785, 33-53785-01,
33-60859, and 33-60859-01), and Form S-8 (File No. 33-30317) of our report dated
February 2, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedules of PECO Energy Company and Subsidiary Companies as
of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1997, which report is included (or incorporated by reference)
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

2400 Eleven Penn Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 9, 1997
#### NATIONAL LOAN & INVESTMENT CO. OF DETROIT, MICH., v. BROWNE.

No. 9894.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Nov. 12, 1936.

Lorimer Brown & Davis, of Harlingen, for appellant.

Rentfro & Cole, of Brownsville, for ap-pellee.

MURRAY, Justice.

Appellant, the National Loan & Investment Company of Detroit, Mich., instituted this suit against Stephen P. Browne seeking to recover the amount of principal, interest, and attorney’s fees alleged to be due upon a certain promissory note in the principal sum of $6,500. It was further alleged that the note was secured by a deed of trust upon certain real estate which had been sold at a trustee’s sale, the amount derived from the sale credited on the note, and the suit was for the balance due upon the note.

Appellee filed a plea to the jurisdiction alleging that under the provisions of article 2218a, Vernon’s Annotated Texas Civil Statutes, the court was without jurisdiction to hear and decide the case. This plea was sustained and the cause dismissed, hence this appeal.

Article 2218a, § 2, reads as follows:

> “All actions for the recovery of any judgment on any note or notes secured by .a lien on real estate shall be brought within six months after the date of any sale of the real estate security and no court shall have any jurisdiction to maintain any such action brought after such date.”

The above is section 2 of House Bill No. 150, Acts 1933 Legislature, Regular Session, p. 198, c. 92. This entire act has been held to be unconstitutional and void. Langever v. Miller, 124 Tex. 80, 76 S.W.(2d) 1025, 96 A.L.R. 836; Lisenbee v. Wichita Falls Bldg. & Loan Ass’n (Tex.Civ.App.) 82 S.W.(2d) 688; Farm & Home Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Robertson (Tex.Civ.App.) 82 S.W.(2d) 155; Stahlman et al. v. McManus (Tex.Civ.App.) 93 S.W.(2d) 470.

It follows that the trial court erred in sustaining the plea and dismissing the cause. The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

?femreble I. E. Lanlep 

&xi@y Auditor 
. 
. . 

aroaot truuferablo to the ere4lt of uwtinr dlstriot wlthln trm 6661 hu5tln Broth- 

+wa Brldgo warty coulty, 

247 5. 18. BrotnoM Ye Potton, 

226 9. w. 702 

In view of the fcm~0slq JOti are re8poatrull~ adYlwd tint it 1s the opLJo¶Lof tur 4epartmeat that em comml8sloI-AeM' court of cw 

very truly JOura
Exhibit 23-1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Prospectuses constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3
(Nos. 333-23659, 33-53435, 333-23653, 333-04813, 333-53501, and 2-76135)
and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-23981, 333-23645,
333-12827, 33-62892, 333-23655, and 33-43838) of our report dated February
18, 1998, appearing on page 33 of Pennsylvania Enterprises, Inc.'s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.



PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP      





Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 5, 1998
<PAGE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00452-CR

Antonio Perez Lopez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 390TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-13-904067, HONORABLE JULIE H. KOCUREK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Antonio Perez Lopez was charged with three counts of aggravated sexual

assault of a child, three counts of indecency with a child by contact, and two counts of indecency

with a child by exposure. A jury found Lopez guilty of one count of aggravated sexual assault of a

child, two counts of indecency with a child by contact, and one count of indecency with a child by

exposure. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 22.021, 21.11. The jury acquitted Lopez on all other charges.

The jury assessed Lopez’s punishment at 20 years’ confinement in the Texas Department of

Criminal Justice-Institutional Division on the counts for aggravated sexual assault of a child and

indecency with a child by contact and at 10 years on the indecency with a child by exposure count.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of

Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there

are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);
Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

86–87 (1988).

Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to examine

the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at

766. Appellant requested and received the appellate record and filed a pro se brief, raising four

issues on appeal.

We have conducted an independent review of the record, including appellate

counsel’s brief and appellant’s pro se brief, and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 1

744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and the

appeal is frivolous.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field 

Affirmed

Filed: August 12, 2015

Do Not Publish

Appellant has raised claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in his pro se brief which, 1

if appellant wishes to pursue those claims, should be raised in a petition for writ of habeas corpus

in the Court of Criminal Appeals because the record before this Court does not support those claims.

2
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification****of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Shelby Acquisition II, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      James R. Kerr, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/James
                R. KerrJames
                R. Kerr
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              March
                11, 2008
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00450

- CV

Jacqueline Harrington, Appellant

v.

Cross Creek of Texas, Ltd., Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COUR T OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C

- 1

- CV

- 19

- 001649 , THE HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRE SIDI NG

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant ’s brief was originally due on September 25, 2019

. On November 4, 2019

,

this C ourt sent a notice to appellant informing her that her brief was overdue and that a failure to

file a satisfactory response by Nov ember 14, 20 1 9

, would result in the dismissal of this appeal

for want of p rosecution. To date, appellant has n ot filed a brief or a motion for extension of

time. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. S e e Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly

Dismis sed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: December 13, 2019
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   I, Nicholas Stone, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Max Nutrition, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;    5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.   Date: September 19, 2007   /s/  Nicholas Stone Nicholas Stone Title: President and Chief Financial Officer  2
#### Kudysh, Appellant, *v.*Ohio State Board of Optometry, Appellee.

(No. 28889

Decided December 31, 1941.)

*152
      *Mr. Howell Leuck*and *Mr. Bingham W. Zellmer,*for appellant.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. Howard Bernstein,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                  15,900,199
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              15,900,199
<CASH>                                         469,061
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,417,555
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 25,385
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                832,343
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       183,732
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,066,659
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,250,391
<PREMIUMS>                                     140,928
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             23,565
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      71,524
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            63,511
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (71,683)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (24,402)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (47,281)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (47,281)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  30,121
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             71,524
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              76,260
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 25,385
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,As adopted pursuant toSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Quarterly Report of Park Bancorp, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2004, (the Report), I, Steven J. Pokrak, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

/s/   Steven J. Pokrak
Steven J. PokrakTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer

May 14, 2004

17

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2979 

To allow the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to provide greater 

protection to servicemembers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2015 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself, Mr. ELLISON, Mrs. LAWRENCE, Mr. ISRAEL, 

Mr. TAKAI, Mr. HINOJOSA, Ms. NORTON, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. CICILLINE, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Mr. KILDEE, Ms. JUDY CHU

of California, and Ms. MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To allow the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to 

provide greater protection to servicemembers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Consumer 

5 Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION. 

7 Section 1002(12) of the Consumer Financial Protec8 tion Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5481(12)) is amended— 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2979 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (Q), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

2 and inserting a semicolon; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (R), by striking the period 

4 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(S) sections 101, 107 (except with respect 

7 to bailments), 108 (except with respect to in8 surance), 201 (except with respect to child cus9 tody proceedings), 207, 301, 302, 303, 305, 

10 and 305A of the Servicemembers Civil Relief 

11 Act (50 U.S.C. App. 511, 517, 518, 521, 527, 

12 531, 532, 533, 535, and 535a).’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of JAG MEDIA GROUP, INC. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities
and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  August
3, 2009





/s/ Charles
Stidham





Name:
Charles Stidham


Title:  Chief
Executive Officer











Dated:  August
3, 2009





/s/ Charles
Stidham





Name:
Charles Stidham


Title:  Chief
Financial Officer
# C_2023258EN.01000401.xml

| 21.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/4

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.106575

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 258/03)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 31.3.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.106575 |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCTF — Emergency support to bus transport operators (Reintroduction of Scheme SA.104566) |
| Legal basis | Ministerial Decree September 13, 2022, No 273 — Modalities for the partial repayment of the expenditure incurred in the second four- month period of the year 2022 for the purchase of fuel to power buses. |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | |
| Budget | |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | 1.5.2022 — 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Other passenger land transport n.e.c. |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport — General Directorate for Road Safety and Road Transport |
| via Giuseppe Caraci, 36 — 00157 Roma — Italia |

Date of adoption of the decision

31.3.2023

Aid number

SA.106575

Member State

Italy

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCTF — Emergency support to bus transport operators (Reintroduction of Scheme SA.104566)

Legal basis

Ministerial Decree September 13, 2022, No 273 — Modalities for the partial repayment of the expenditure incurred in the second four- month period of the year 2022 for the purchase of fuel to power buses.

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Budget

Intensity

Duration

1.5.2022 — 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Other passenger land transport n.e.c.

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport — General Directorate for Road Safety and Road Transport

via Giuseppe Caraci, 36 — 00157 Roma — Italia

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---