alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit (21)



POTLATCH CORPORATION



Subsidiaries



The following subsidiaries are included in the companys consolidated financial statements.



|Name                                 |  | State in Which Voting Organized |  | Percentage of Securities Owned
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Duluth & Northeastern Railroad Co.   |  | Minnesota                       |  | 100                           
|Cloquet, Minn.                       |  |                                 |  |                               
|                                    
|Prescott & Northwestern Railroad Co. |  | Arkansas                        |  | 100                           
|Prescott, Ark.                       |  |                                 |  |                               
|                                    
|St. Maries River Railroad Co.        |  | Idaho                           |  | 100                           
|Lewiston, Idaho                      |  |                                 |  |                               
|                                    
|Warren & Saline River Railroad Co.   |  | Arkansas                        |  | 100                           
|Warren, Ark.                         |  |                                 |  |                               



All unnamed subsidiaries, when
considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary. No separate financial statements are filed for any subsidiary.
**Exhibit 32.1****WrittenStatement of Chief Executive Officer****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Colonial Properties Trust, the general partner ofColonial Realty Limited Partnership, hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof: (a) the Form 10-Q of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the quarter ended March 31,2006 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and  (b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership.         By: /s/ C. Reynolds Thompson, III             C. Reynolds Thompson, III      *Chief Executive Officer of Colonial Properties Trust,*      *the general partner of Colonial Realty Limited*      *Partnership*             May 10, 2006
36
#### S. I. ROBISON et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. WHALEY FARM CORPORATION, Defendant in Error.

Motion No. 9587; No. 5714.

Supreme Court of Texas.

June 24, 1931.

For former opinion, see 37 S.W.(2d) 714.

SHORT, C.

The plaintiffs in error have filed a motion for rehearing in this case, which has received our careful consideration and which we overrule. In doing so, however, we think it proper to say that the original opinion does not preclude the commissioners’ court of Bowie county from instituting condemnation proceedings of the land for road purposes, provided_only that it does so in "the manner prescribed by statute. Neither does the original opinion preclude Bowie county, or those of its citizens interested in the subject-matter, from prosecuting a suit against the defendant in error, based upon the contention that Bowie county, and its citizens interested, have acquired by prescription all or any portion of the strip of land in controversy in this case at this time. The original opinion merely holds, on this subject, that the record does not affirmatively show that the trial judge, who tried the case without the aid of a jury, intended to hold, as a fact, that any portion of the land in controversy had been so acquired. Moreover, it further appears from the record that if the district judge had so intended to so hold, the pleadings were not sufficient to identify the strip of land so' claimed to have been acquired by prescription.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19

                           INSTALLMENT PROMISSORY NOTE

$1,952,834.67                                             SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
                                                          MARCH 31, 2003

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Poinsture Insurance Services, Inc.
("Maker"), promises to pay to the order of EAGLE PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, its
successors and assigns ("Holder"), the principal sum of One Million Nine Hundred
Fifty Two Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty Four Dollars and Sixty-Seven Cents
($1,952,834.67) together with interest at the rate of 3% per annum based upon
the March 31, 2003 outstanding balance of $1,952,834.67 due the Holder.

This Installment Promissory Note ("Note") is subject to the following terms:

1.   Payment. The Maker agrees to pay the Holder the total of $2,011,419.71,
     which is the principal sum of $1,952,834.67 together with $58,585.04
     interest, and agrees to pay such $2,011,419.71 in accordance with the
     attached Addendum A. The Maker agrees to pay such monthly installments to
     the Holder in lawful currency of the United States of America in
     immediately available funds to Holder's address at 2101 4th Avenue, Suite
     1600, Seattle, WA 98121 or at such other address as the Holder may from
     time to time designate.

2.   Prepayment. Maker has the right and option to prepay this Note or any
     portion thereof at any time, without penalty. Should the principal sum of
     $1,952,834.67 be repaid in full before December 31, 2003, then the monthly
     interest amount for the remaining scheduled installments will be forgiven.
     However, should the principal sum of $1,952,834.67 not be repaid before
     September 30, 2003, then the full amount of the interest is due regardless
     of any subsequent prepayment.

3.   Acceleration. Maker agrees that:

     a.   If maker fails to pay within five (5) days of the due date as outlined
          on Addendum A; or

     b.   If a bankruptcy petition or any other form of insolvency shall be
          filed by or against Maker; or

     c.   If a petition for the appointment of a receiver or trustee for all or
          a portion of Maker's property shall be filed; or

     d.   If any assignment of Maker's for the benefit of creditors or otherwise
          shall be made; or

     e.   If Maker's January 1, 2003 Administrative Services Agreement with
          Eagle Pacific Insurance Company shall be cancelled;

     Then, in any such event, all sums due and payable under this Note will
     become fully and immediately due and payable at the sole option of Holder,
     without notice, demand, or protest of any kind. No failure to exercise such
     option shall be deemed a waiver or release. The Holder shall have all the
     remedies provided by law and equity for any default under this Note. The
     remedies of the Holder shall be cumulative and concurrent and may be
     pursued singularly, successively, or together against the Maker at the sole
     discretion of the Holder.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20661

Summary Calendar

 

NOEL C. ALLEN, Individually and

on behalf of the Estate of Travis

O’Neill Allen; REBECCA O’NEILL ALLEN,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus

MICHAEL LEAL ET AL.,

 Defendants,

MICHAEL LEAL; CARLE UPSHAW,

Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-97-CV-0030

- - - - - - - - - -

April 21, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendants Leal and Upshaw appeal from the district court’s

denial of their motion for summary judgment based upon qualified

immunity. They argue that the district court erred by denying

their summary-judgment motion and that this court has

jurisdiction over the interlocutory appeal. Because there is a
2

significant fact-related dispute, however, this court does not

have jurisdiction to review the denial of the motion for summary

judgment. See Johnson v. Jones, 515 U.S. 304, 313 (1995). 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
# C_2022309EN.01000501.xml

| 16.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/5

---

Announcement pursuant to Article 13 of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions concerning the liquidation and subsequent winding-up of Cyprus Popular Bank Public CO LTD (Cypriot credit institution in liquidation) (the ‘Company’)

(2022/C 309/05)

Announcement regarding the proof of debt by creditors of the Company

Registered Office: Lemesos Avenue, 134, 3rd Floor, 2015, Strovolos, Nicosia, Cyprus

Pursuant to the decision of the District Court of Nicosia issued on 31 May 2022 in relation to application no. 1/2021 filed by the Central Bank of Cyprus under the provisions of article 33B of the Business of Credit Institutions Law, 66(Ι)/97, as amended to date, the Court has issued orders for the liquidation of the Company and my appointment as Liquidator.

Pursuant to the Order of the District Court of Nicosia dated 17 June 2022, an extension of the period in which creditors can prove their debts or claims has been granted up to and including 16 October 2022, as well as an extension of the period for the examination of the proof of debt of each creditor by the Liquidator,to 150 days from the date of submission of each proof of debt.

Furthermore, pursuant to the Order of the District Court of Nicosia dated 1 July 2022, the proof of debt process shall be carried out electronically. All creditors who have a claim against the Company and wish to submit their claim electronically, are requested to visit the following website https://registration.appadvisory.eu/register and follow the instructions for the submission of their details in order to receive unique login details for the liquidation’s Creditor Portal.

All relevant announcements for the liquidation will be published on the following website

https://www.ips-docs.com/case/22WUC009CYP/Gn8@pXmv

Augoustinos PAPATHOMAS

Liquidator

The liquidator acts as representative of the Company, without any personal liability

---
#### TEXAS TANNING & MFG. CO. v. ORR.

No. 2874.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Jan. 23, 1936.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1936.

B. F. Pye, of Beaumont, for appellant.

J. A. Pelt, of Sour Lake, for appellee.

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This suit by appellant, Texas Tanning & Manufacturing Company, against appellee, N. T. Orr, based upon a sworn account, originated in justice court, with judgment in justice court for appellee. In county court, on trial to the court without a jury, judgment was again entered in favor of appellee, from which this appeal was regularly prosecuted.

In defense appellee pleaded that he returned the goods to appellant, and the statute of limitation of two years. The evidence supported both defenses. Appellee swore that he returned all the goods sued for, and, under the evidence, when the suit was filed in justice court, the account sued upon was more than two years past due.

Appellant offered in evidence certain letters from appellee by which it asserts he acknowledged the justness of the account and promised to pay it. The proposition is advanced that these letters, as a matter of law, destroyed appellee’s defense that the goods were returned, and, as the letters were not four years old when the suit was filed, they took the case out of the statutes of limitation. Appellee did not contest the genuineness of these letters, but swore they related to goods not involved in any way in this suit.

The judgment of the lower court is in all things affirmed.
|   | (i) | the      Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,      2009 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or 15(d) , as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as      amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | November      13, 2009 |   | By:                                 | /s/      Jeffrey J. Raymond |
|--------|------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|   |                   |   |                                |                        |
|   |                   |   | Name:      Jeffrey J. Raymond       |
|   |                   |   | Title:  President         |
|   |                   |   |                                |                        |
| Date:  | November      13, 2009 |   | By:                                 | /s/      Stephen DelVecchia |
|   |                   |   |                                |                        |
|   |                   |   | Name:      Stephen DelVecchia       |
|   |                   |   | Title:      Chief Financial Officer |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 3, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 288 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-606, CP2024-614.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21301 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2022009EN.01000201.xml

| 10.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/2

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2022/C 9/02)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 8.12.2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 8.12.2021 - 31.12.2021 |
| Member State | France |
| Stock or Group of stocks | ALB/AN05N |
| Species | Northern Albacore (Thunnus alalunga) |
| Zone | Atlantic Ocean, north of 5° N |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 21/TQ92 |

Date and time of closure

8.12.2021

Duration

8.12.2021 - 31.12.2021

Member State

France

Stock or Group of stocks

ALB/AN05N

Species

Northern Albacore (Thunnus alalunga)

Zone

Atlantic Ocean, north of 5° N

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

21/TQ92

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Alan Campbell, Chief Financial Officer of Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I, Ltd., certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 26, 2008 (the Quarterly Report), which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I,
Ltd.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.

Dated: October 31, 2008



/s/ ALAN CAMPBELLAlan CampbellChief Financial Officer, Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I, Ltd.




47
Motion s Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

October 19 , 2021
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00390

- CV

LESLIE BEAN AND TOM KARTSOTIS , Appellant s
V.
AMY BEAN & SUE BEAN , Appellee
On Appeal from the Probate Court No 2 Ha rri s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 467,316

- 401

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants separately fi led notice s of appeal from a n order signed July 8, 2021 . On October 1, 2021 , appellant , Leslie Bean, filed a motion to dismiss her appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. On October 5, 2021, appellant, Tom Kartsotis, filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. See id

. The motion s are granted. We dismiss the appeal

. PER CU RIAM
Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Hassan and P o issant.
#### JETER v. STATE.

No. 20564.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 8, 1939.

Stinson, Hair, Brooks & Duke, of Abilene, for appellant.

*858Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was charged with the offense of removing mortgaged property out of the state. His punishment was fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The indictment alleges a mortgage to W. J. Fulwiler. The copy of the instrument relied upon was offered in evidence over the objection of the appellant. It showed a mortgage of an automobile to the Security Investment Company.

The introduction of the mortgage, timely objected to, with a proper bill of exception, brings the matter before this court for review. There was a variance between the indictment and the proof, and the court committed error in admitting the mortgage to the Security Investment Company, which requires that this cause be reversed. See Borger v. State, 126 Tex.Cr.R. 5, 70 S.W.2d 195.

There are other questions in the appeal which, in view of this holding, are not discussed as they will, in all probability, not arise again in this case.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.’
# C_2022410EN.01001001.xml

| 26.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/10

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10800 – AHLSELL / SANISTAL)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 410/09)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Ahlsell Danmark ApS (Denmark, ‘Ahlsell’), controlled by CVC Capital Partners SICAV-FIS S.A. (Luxembourg, ‘CVC’), |
| --- | --- |

—

Ahlsell Danmark ApS (Denmark, ‘Ahlsell’), controlled by CVC Capital Partners SICAV-FIS S.A. (Luxembourg, ‘CVC’),

| — | Sanistål A/S (Denmark, ‘Sanistal’). |
| --- | --- |

—

Sanistål A/S (Denmark, ‘Sanistal’).

Ahlsell will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Sanistal.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares as well as by way of public bid accounced on 24 May 2022.

2.

| — | CVC is a large global investment manager focussed on private equity, secondaries and credit. |
| --- | --- |

—

CVC is a large global investment manager focussed on private equity, secondaries and credit.

| — | Ahlsell is a CVC fund’s portfolio company and a retailer and distributor of mainly installation products and tools & supplies to professional customers in the Nordic region. |
| --- | --- |

—

Ahlsell is a CVC fund’s portfolio company and a retailer and distributor of mainly installation products and tools & supplies to professional customers in the Nordic region.

| — | Sanistal provides a wide assortment of products with a primary focus on plumbing, heating, ventilation, air conditioning and tools & supplies, including personal protective equipment, for industry and construction in Denmark and the Baltics. |
| --- | --- |

—

Sanistal provides a wide assortment of products with a primary focus on plumbing, heating, ventilation, air conditioning and tools & supplies, including personal protective equipment, for industry and construction in Denmark and the Baltics.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10800 – AHLSELL / SANISTAL

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---