alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dwight McLellan, certify that:

1.   I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB  of Aspen  Racing
     Stables, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to
     make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report.

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in this  quarterly  report,  fairly  present  in all
     material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash
     flows of the  registrant  as of, and for,  the  periods  presented  in this
     quarterly report.

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
     procedures  (as  defined in Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
          disclosure   controls  and   procedures  to  be  designed   under  our
          supervision,  to ensure  that  material  information  relating  to the
          Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us
          by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the period in
          which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's  disclosure  controls and
          procedures  and  presented  in this report our  conclusions  about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.

5.   I have disclosed,  based on my most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of directors  (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  that  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b.   Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls.

Date:  July 27, 2007                /s/ Dwight McLellan
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Dwight McLellan President
                                    and Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Prinicpal Executive, Financial,
                                    and Accounting Officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21336]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 305 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-629, CP2024-638.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21336 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
(

) 

, 

amended, effective March 15, 1985 (D.C. Law 5-165; D.C. Official Code § 8-101.05 and 8-

101.06(b)), section 107(4) of the District Department of the Environment Establishment Act of

2005, effective February 15, 2006 (D.C. Law 16-51; D.C. Official Code § 8-151.07(4)), Mayor’s

Order 98-44, dated April 10, 1998, and Mayor’s Order 2006-61, dated June 14, 2006, herebygives notice of this final action to amend Chapter 4, reserve Chapters 11-14, and adopt a newChapter 15 to Title 20 (Environment) of the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations(DCMR), as published with the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the D.C. Register on April

24, 2009, 56 DCR 3132.The rules are necessary to amend general conformity requirements and adopt new transportationconformity regulations that will help develop and implement the air quality State ImplementationPlan (SIP). The air quality SIP includes conformity of federal actions based on the federal Clean

Air Act, § 110 and 171-193 (Part D), 42 U.S.C. § 7410 and 7501 et seq., as amended. The

federal conformity regulations in 40 CFR § 93.100-.160 establish standards and procedures tofollow when evaluating the conformity of federal projects to all applicable implementation plans.

Transportation conformity is a way to ensure that federal funding goes to transportation activities

that are consistent with national, regional, and local air quality goals. A transportation

conformity determination demonstrates that the total emissions projected for a plan or programare within the emissions limits established by the SIP, and that transportation control measuresare implemented in a timely fashion. Transportation conformity applies to transportation plans,

transportation improvement programs, and projects funded or approved by the Federal HighwayAdministration or the Federal Transit Administration in areas that do not meet or previously havenot met air quality standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, particulate matter, or nitrogen dioxide.

These areas are known as “nonattainment” and “maintenance” areas. The District of Columbia iscurrently in nonattainment for ozone and the annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5)standard. TheDistrict is also a maintenance area for the daily PM2.5standard and carbon monoxide.

Since conformity commitments in the SIP must be enforceable, the District’s responsibilities

must be codified in the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations.

No comments were received on the proposed rules and no changes have been made to the text of

the proposed rules as previously published. After a forty-five (45) day review period before the

Council of the District of Columbia, the rules were deemed approved on November 28, 2009.

The rules will become effective upon publication of this notice in the D.C. Register.

000527
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Precision Castparts
Corp. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended April 1, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Donegan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Date: May 31, 2007                  
|                                    
|/s/ MARK DONEGAN                    
|Mark Donegan                        
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23


                          Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors
Polaroid Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No.
33-36384 on Form S-8, No. 33-44661 on Form S-3, No.33-51173 on Form S-8, and No.
333-0791 on Form S-3 of Polaroid Corporation of our reports dated January 27,
1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Polaroid Corporation and
subsidiary companies as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, cash flows, and changes in common
stockholders' equity, and the related financial statement schedule for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which reports appear
in the December 31, 1997, annual report on Form 10-K of Polaroid Corporation.
Our reports refer to a change in the method of accounting for depreciation.




                                            KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Boston Massachusetts
March 30, 1998
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF

THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the Annual Report of Rewards Network Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald L. Blake, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                                                      
|-------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|March 17, 2008 |  | /s/    RONALD L.
BLAKE                               
|               |  | Ronald L. Blake President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MALIK E. FORTES

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 21

- 2015

LT Case No. 2019

- CF

- 003485

- A

- Y

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Decision filed November 8, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for M arion County

, Steven G. Rogers , Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Victoria Rose Cordero, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee,
and Roberts J. Bradford, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER

, WALLIS and EISNAUGLE , JJ., concur.
>>> <Nizich.Greg@epamail.epa.gov> 6/27/2008 11:33 AM >>>

Hi Mary,

Thanks for the information. We will look it over and get back to you.

I understand from Russell Wozniak that information from DOW will be

coming to us the week of July 11.

Greg.

Greg Nizich,

USEPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Coatings and Chemicals Group

919-541-3078

"Mary

Bachynsky/FPC

Environmental To

Dept." Greg Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

<mbachynsky@fpcu cc

sa.com> "de la Cruz, Peter"

<delacruz@khlaw.com>,

06/27/2008 11:12 <greg_bocchi@plastics.org>, "Mary

AM Bachynsky"

<mbachynsky@fpcusa.com>

Subject

VI PVC MACT Submittal: Estimated

HAPs

Dear Greg;

As promised, attached please find a letter, along with a referenced

enclosure, regarding the Subject issue.

Upon your review please let us know of any questions.

Best Regards,

Mary Bachynsky

<<EPA Surrogacy Letter2008-06-26.doc>> <<VI EPA

Submittal2008-06-26.pdf>>

Mary P. Bachynsky

Formosa Plastics Corp. U.S. A.

9 Peach Tree Hill Road

Livingston, New Jersey 07039

Phone: 973-716-7342 Cell: 862-485-5542

mbachynsky@fpcusa.com

mailto:mbachynsky@fpcusa.com>

____________________________________________________________

This communication is solely for use by the intended recipient and may

contain information that is privileged, confidential or copyrighted
under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are

hereby formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this

communication, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Unless

explicitly stated, this communication does not constitute a contract

offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance of a contract offer. This

communication also does not constitute consent to the use of sender's

contact information for direct marketing purposes or for transfers of

data to third parties.(See attached file: EPA Surrogacy

Letter2008-06-26.doc)(See attached file: VI EPA Submittal2008-06-26.pdf)
Exhibit 31.1

 

CERTIFICATIONOFTHEPRESIDENTPURSUANTTO

SECTION 302 OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT

 

I, Peter Destler, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GD Conference Center, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2007;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

 

c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

 

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 5th day of June, 2007.

 

/s/ Peter Destler

Peter Destler

President (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
*OPINION ISSUED MAY 14, 2009*

#### SAMMY RAY COPLEY VS. REGIONAL JAIL AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITY

(CC-08-0443)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Ronald R. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant, an inmate at the Southwestern Regional Jail in Holden, Logan County, seeks $39.16 for items of personal property that were entrusted to respondent. When claimant sent his clothes to the jail’s laundry facility, his clothes were misplaced. *259Claimant seeks reimbursement for three pairs of underwear ($4.36 each), three undershirts ($4.36 each), one thermal top ($6.50), and one thermal bottom ($6.50). In its Answer, respondent admits the validity of the claim and that the amount is fair and reasonable.

This Court has taken the position in prior claims that if a bailment situation has been created, respondent is responsible for property of an inmate which is taken from that inmate, remains in its custody, and is not produced for return to the inmate.

Accordingly, the Court makes an award to the claimant herein in the amount of $39.16.

Award of $39.16.
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
 c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Robert G. Ruhlman

     Robert G. Ruhlman
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
     (Principal Executive Officer)
#### MARTIN v. STATE.

No. 20940.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 24, 1940.

Tom L. Robinson, of Gatesville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The conviction is for driving an automobile upon the public highway while intoxicated; penalty assessed at confinement in' the county jail for thirty days and a fine of fifty dollars.

The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts.. No question has been presented for review. However, the appellant, through his attorney, has filed a written motion requesting the affirmance of the case. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
# C_2023231EN.01001601.xml

| 30.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/16

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107858

(2023/C 231/15)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 12.6.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107858 |
| Member State | Croatia |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCTF: Program državne potpore za kompenzaciju rasta troškova proizvodnje u sektorima stočarske i biljne proizvodnje |
| Legal basis | članak 39., Zakon o poljoprivredi (Narodne novine 118/18, 42/20, 127/20, 52/21 and 152/22) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 30 960 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministry of Agriculture |
| Ulica grada Vukovara 78 |

Date of adoption of the decision

12.6.2023

Aid number

SA.107858

Member State

Croatia

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCTF: Program državne potpore za kompenzaciju rasta troškova proizvodnje u sektorima stočarske i biljne proizvodnje

Legal basis

članak 39., Zakon o poljoprivredi (Narodne novine 118/18, 42/20, 127/20, 52/21 and 152/22)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 30 960 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministry of Agriculture

Ulica grada Vukovara 78

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
#### MYERS et al. v. FLEWELLEN et al.

No. 4160.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

March 10, 1932.

Touchstone, Wight, Gormley & Price, of Dallas, for appellants.

Brooks & Pace, of Tyler, for appellees.

WILLSON, O. J.

(after stating the case as above).

 The contention that .the suit being, as shown by appellees’ petition, for sums aggregating more than $1,000, the court below was without power to hear and determine it, must be sustained. When jurisdiction depends, as here, upon the “amount in controversy,” such amount is the aggregate of the sums claimed in the petition. Isbell v. Dredging Co., 113 Tex. 528, 261 S. W. 762; Security Co. v. Bank, 93 Tex. 575, 57 S. W. 22; Rust v. Ry. Co., 107 Tex. 385, 180 S. W. 95. The aggregate of the sum claimed in ap-pellees’ petition was $2,300. The county court was without power to hear and determine a suit in which the amount in controversy was greater than $1,000. R. S. 1925, arts. 1949,1950.

The judgment will be reversed, and the cause will be remanded to the court below, with instructions to dismiss same.