alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Colonial Properties Trust, our
general partner, hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

         (a)      the Form 10-Q of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the
                  period ended June 30, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the
                  Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report) fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b)      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership.



                                         /s/ Howard B. Nelson , Jr.
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Howard B. Nelson, Jr.
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         August 14, 2003
From: Carlson, Sara <Sara.Carlson@anadarko.com>

Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 3:44 PM

To: Land, Eva

Cc: Rahul Pendse (rpendse@trinityconsultants.com)

Subject: EIAPP Certificates

- Diamond BlackHawk (Anadarko)

Attachments: EIAPP Certificates.pdf

Hey Eva,

Attached are the EIAPP certificates for the 8 main engines on the Diamond BlackHawk.

Thanks,

Sara Carlson

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

EHS Representative II, Gulf of Mexico

Sara.Carlson@anadar ko.com

832

- 636

- 1273 (office)

832

- 506

- 0888 (cell)

Click here for Anadarko’s Electronic Mail Disclaimer
# C_2022428EN.01000101.xml

| 10.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 428/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 428/1

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case M.10507 – HITACHI RAIL / GROUND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS BUSINESS OF THALES)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 428/01)

On 4 October 2022, the European Commission received notification (1) of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) (‘Merger Regulation’).

On 3 November 2022, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification.

---

(1)  OJ C 391, 12.10.2022, p. 7.

(2)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification**

I, Henry R. Bond, Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of Agilysys, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies (1) with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

Dated: June 14, 2011 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request. 

(1) As explained more fully in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Annual Report does not include, asrequired by the Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X , the separate financial statements of Magirus AG, a privately owned German company in which the Company formerly held a 20% equity interest until the Company disposed of such interest onNovember 15, 2008.
Director, Bureau of Air 

Kansas Department of Health and Environment 

1000 SW Jackson, Suite 310 

Topeka, Kansas 66612 

Dear Mr. Brunetti: 

Thank you for the recommendations regarding the attainment status selected areas in Kansas under the 

2010 sulfur dioxide national ambient air quality standard that your agency sent us on September 17, 

2015. As you know, we are subject to a March 2, 2015, court order directing us to promulgate S02 

designations for these areas under section 107 of the Clean Air Act by July 2, 2016. Specifically, we are 

required to promulgate designations for these areas because they contain sources meeting the S02 

emissions criteria identified in the consent decree. The information you provided on September 17, 

2015, will greatly help us meet this duty and ensure protection of public health in Kansas. 

In addition to the information you have provided, we have recently received modeling and related 

information from the Sierra Club that is relevant to a subset of the areas to be addressed by July 2, 2016. 

In your state, we have received information pertinent to the area near the BPU Nearman facility. We 

have already provided this information to your staff. Please let us know if you have any questions about 

the information we have received or if you need any additional information. 

I am writing to solicit your review of the information that Sierra Club has provided, so that the U. S. 

Environmental Protection Agency can base its designations decisions on the best available information. 

The Clean Air Act provides for designations to be developed through a partnership of state agencies and 

the EPA; however, we also believe it is important to consider significant and relevant information that 

members of the public provide to us. Consistent with the structure of the Clean Air Act, we believe that 

the best first step in addressing this information would be for your agency to provide its review of this 

information. Since the Sierra Club's recommendation differs from your recommendation, we would 

welcome your commentary generally on the information as well as your detailed review of the elements 

of Sierra Club's analysis. To the extent practicable, we would appreciate quantitative comparisons of 

data used in Sierra Club's analysis compared to the data used in your analysis, to help us evaluate the 

elements of the two analyses. 

*Printed on Recycled Paper 
Becky Weber 

Director 

Air and Waste Management Division
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of SURFACECOATINGS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended  March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicatedbelow, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 

Dated:   May 20, 2013

 

/s/Charles Smith

 

Name:  Charles Smith

Title: Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Dated:   May 20, 2013

 

/s/Charles Smith

 

Name: Charles Smith

Title: President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretaryand Treasurer
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of JAG MEDIA GROUP, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  April 26, 2010





/s/ Charles Stidham





Name: Charles Stidham


Title:  Chief Executive Officer











Dated:  April 26, 2010





/s/ Charles Stidham





Name: Charles Stidham


Title:  Chief Financial Officer
# C_2023098EN.01000101.xml

| 16.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10990 – WESTCOAST / KOMSA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 98/01)

On 8 March 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M10990. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M10990. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
- 568 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance S

297 Nebraska Report

COHAN v. MEDICAL IMAGING CONSULTANTS

Cite as 297 Neb. 568

Mary Cohan and Terry Cohan, indivi

and as wife and husband, appellant

cross-appellees, v. Medical Im

Consultants, P.C., et al., appell

and cross-appellan

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed August 25, 2017. No. S-16-145.

supplemental opin

Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: James T.

Gleason, Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion modified. Motions for rehearing overrule

Richard J. Rensch and Sean P. Rensch, of Rensch & Rensch 

Law, P.C., L.L.O., for appellants.

David D. Ernst and Kellie Chesire Olson, of Pansing, Hogan, 

Ernst & Bachman, L.L.P., for appellees Medical Imaging 

Consultants, P.C., and Robert M. Faulk, M.D.

William R. Settles and Kate Geyer Johnson, of Lamson, 

Dugan & Murray, L.L.P., for appellees Bellevue Obstetrics and 

Gynecology Associates, P.C., et al.

Heavican, C.J., Wright, Miller-Lerman, Cassel, S

Kelch, J

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

09/08/2017 01:10 AM CDT
- 569 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance S

297 Nebraska Report

COHAN v. MEDICAL IMAGING CONSULTANTS

Cite as 297 Neb. 568

Per Curiam

We consider the appellees’ motions for rehearing concerning our opinion in Cohan v. Medical Imaging Consultants.

1

We overrule the motions, but we modify the original opinion 

as follows:

In the section of the opinion designated “3. Cross-Appeal

by Appellees,” we add a sentence at the end of the first

paragraph,2 such that the paragraph reads as follows:

Appellees’ cross-appeals assign as error the admission 

of Dr. Naughton’s testimony. Appellees moved to strike 

Dr. Naughton’s testimony because they claimed that only 

Mary’s prognosis at the time of trial was relevant and that 

Nebraska did not recognize a theory of recovery based 

upon loss of chance. The district court, in overruling 

the motions to strike, found that Dr. Naughton’s opinion 

was relevant for the limited purpose of establishing that 

early discovery of cancer leads to a better prognosis. We 

understand the district court to have used “prognosis” to 

refer to the risk of recurrence and the probability of an 

improved outcome.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

 Former opinion modif

 Motions for rehearing overru

Funke, J., not participatin

1 Cohan v. Medical Imaging Consultants, ante p. 111, ___ N.W.2d ___ 

(2017).

2 Id. at 129-130, ___ N.W.2d at ___.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         344,000               1,394,000
<SECURITIES>                             2,719,137,000           2,663,856,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,709,000              18,258,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,739,190,000           2,683,508,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       66,037,000             350,066,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                   346,247,000             346,247,000
<OTHER-SE>                               1,898,038,000           1,605,106,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,739,190,000           2,683,508,000
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           110,882,000             115,777,000
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            25,801,000              30,400,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          28,299,000              36,209,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            406,935,000           (112,677,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                29,444,000                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        377,491,000           (112,677,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               377,491,000           (112,677,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       5.01                  (1.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.01                  (1.34)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Christian S. Schade, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Annual Report of Medarex, Inc. on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information containedin such Annual Report of Medarex, Inc. on Form 10-K fairlypresents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Medarex, Inc.

| Date: March 15, 2006 |       | By:        |       | /s/ CHRISTIAN S. SCHADE                           |
|---------------------------|------------|------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| ** **                | ** ** | **Name:**  |       | **Christian  S. Schade**                               |
|                      | ** ** | **Title:** | ** ** | **Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer** |

 

Signed originals of these written statements requiredby Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging orotherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within theelectronic version of these written statements required by Section 906,have been provided to Medarex, Inc. and will be retained by Medarex, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

This Certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 15(d) andshall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act(15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. ThisCertification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent thatthe Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

----
Exhibit 32.1


Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Colonial Properties Trust, our
general partner, hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)           the Form 10-Q of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the
              period ended June 30, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the
              Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report) fully complies
              with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
              Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)           information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership.



                                                 /s/   Thomas H. Lowder
                                                       ------------------
                                                       Thomas H. Lowder
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                                       August 6, 2004
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                                                 ENCYSIVE PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
                                                 ID: 13-3532643
                                                 6700 West Loop South, 4th Floor
                                                 Bellaire, Texas  77401

NOTICE OF GRANT OF STOCK OPTIONS
AND OPTION AGREEMENT

____________________________                 OPTION NUMBER:        __________
____________________________                 PLAN:                 __________
____________________________                 ID:                   __________

Effective ________, you have been granted a(n) Incentive Stock Option to buy
_____ shares of Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the Company) stock at $________
per share.

The total option price of the shares granted is $_________.

Shares in each period will become fully vested on the date shown.

   Shares               Vest Type         Full Vest           Expiration

   [    One third of granted shares vest on first,       [  Expire 10 years
        second and third anniversary of Grant Date. ]       from Grant Date. ]

By your signature and the Company's signature below, you and the Company agree
that these options are granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of
the Company's Stock Option Plan as amended and the Option Agreement, all of
which are attached and made a part of this document. Also attached hereto is an
Information Memorandum about the Company's Prospectus covering the Plan.

These options are considered to be incentive stock options under Section 422 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. This letter shall constitute a grant of
incentive stock options and an Incentive Agreement under the Plan.

This grant and Incentive Agreement are also subject to the further condition
that YOU RETURN TO US WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS LETTER A
SIGNED COPY OF THIS LETTER to indicate your receipt of the above referenced
documents. Please retain this original letter as your documentation of this
stock option grant and Incentive Agreement.

__________________________________________     ________________________________
Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc.                  Date

__________________________________________     ________________________________
_______________                                Date

                                                                Date: __________
San Joaquin Valley 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

May 8,2007 

Ms. Catherine Witherspoon 

Executive Officer 

California Air Resources Board 

1001 "I" Street 

P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, CA 95812 

Dear Ms. Witherspoon: 

Enclosed is the State Implementation Plan (SIP) Package for the San Joaquin Valley 

Unified Air Pollution Control District (District) 2007 Ozone Plan. The District Governing 

Board adopted the 2007 Ozone Plan at a public hearing held on April 30, 2007. We 

request that the California Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit this plan and the 

appropriate documentation to the United States Enviror~mental Protection Agency (EPA) 

as a SIP revision. 

Included in this SIP Package are the following attachments: 

I. ARB SIP Completeness Checklist 

2. The 2007 Ozone Plan 

3. Evidence of Public Hearing 

4. Governing Board Resolution Adopting the 2007 Ozone Plan 

5. Governing Board Resolution Enhancing SIP-Creditability for Incentive Programs 

6. Public Comments and Responses 

7. Additional Materials (Governing Board Report, Initial Study for CEQA) 

If you have any questions regarding this plan, please contact Donald Hunsaker by email at Donald.Hunsaker@vallevair.org or at (559) 230-5800. The District thanks you 

and your staff for your assistance. 

Sincerely, 

~cott Nester 

Director of Planning 

Attachments 

cc: J. Lindberg Seyed Sadredin 

Executive DirectorIAir Pollution Control Officer 

Northern Region Central Region (Main Office) Southern Region 

4800 Enterprise Way 1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue 2700 M Street, Suite 275 

Modesto, CA 95356-8718 Fresno, CA 93726-0244 Bakersfield, CA 93301-2373 

Tel: (209) 557-6400 FAX: (209) 557-6475 Tel: (559) 230-6000 FAX: (559) 230-6061 Tel: (661) 326-6900 FAX: (661) 326-6985 

www.valleyair.org 

Printed on recycled paper 3
#### SMITH v. STATE.

No. 14409.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 27, 1931.

Harney & Buckley, of Borger, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the ’State.

HAWKINS, J.

Under an indictment charging assault with intent to murder, appellant was convicted of aggravated assault and his punishment assessed at seven months’ confinement in the county jail.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception, save some exceptions to the charge of the court. In the absence of the facts, objections to the court’s charge cannot be appraised.

Nothing is presented for review, and the judgment is affirmed.