alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GARCIA v. STATE.

No. 14214.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 20, 1931.

Albert Stein, of Houston, for appellant.

O’Brien Stevens, Or. Dist. Atty., and E. T. Branch, both of Houston, and Lloyd *W.*Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, J.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years,

At 3 a. m. appellant entered the private residence of Mr. Edge, by opening a back door. Hearing a commotion in the dining room, Mr. Edge, who had just answered a telephone call, upon making an investigation, saw appellant going down the back steps. He pursued appellant for about 21⁄2 blocks and finally caught him. Appellant spoke to him in Spanish, telling him that he was drunk. Mr. Edge delivered appellant into the custody of the officers. Upon making an investigation of the room in which appellant had been, the injured party foulnd that his wife’s trunk had been opened. Before appellant entered the house the trunk was closed.

Appellant testified that he was very drunk when he entered Mr. Edge’s house and that he believed at the time he was entering his own home. He said that he had been at the home of friends drinking beer and was on his way home when he entered the residence of the injured party. He testified further that when he got into the house and found a light burning he discovered his mistake and immediately left. Witnesses for appellant testified that he was drunk at the time he left his friend’s house.

In rebuttal the state offered proof to the effect that the residence of the injured party did not in any way resemble the cottage in which appellant lived. There were sevefal streets between the Mexican quarters, where appellant lived, and the place where Mr. Edge lived. Mr. Edge testified that there was no light in the room when appellant entered. Both the injured party and the officer into whose custody appellant was delivered testified that appellant was not drunk, the officer sqying that appellant “lacked a long ways of being drunk.”

We are unable to reach the conclusion that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction.

No bills of exception are brought forward.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
# C_2023110EN.01001001.xml

| 24.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/10

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.103791

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 110/08)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 20.12.2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.103791 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | SA.103791 — Unterstützungsmaßnahmen Deutschlands in Bezug auf Uniper SE [BMWK/WEA3] |
| Legal basis | Bundeshaushaltsordnung (BHO), Energiesicherungsgesetz (EnSiG) |
| Type of measure | Ad Hoc Case
  Uniper SE with its registered office at Holzstraße 6, 40221 Düsseldorf |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Other forms of equity intervention |
| Budget | Overall budget: 34 500 000 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 34 500 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | From 20.12.2022 |
| Economic sectors | Trade of gas through mains |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz |
| Scharnhorststr. 34-37, 10115 Berlin |

Date of adoption of the decision

20.12.2022

Aid number

SA.103791

Member State

Germany

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

SA.103791 — Unterstützungsmaßnahmen Deutschlands in Bezug auf Uniper SE [BMWK/WEA3]

Legal basis

Bundeshaushaltsordnung (BHO), Energiesicherungsgesetz (EnSiG)

Type of measure

Ad Hoc Case

Uniper SE with its registered office at Holzstraße 6, 40221 Düsseldorf

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Other forms of equity intervention

Budget

Overall budget: 34 500 000 000 EUR

Annual budget: 34 500 000 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

From 20.12.2022

Economic sectors

Trade of gas through mains

Name and address of the granting authority

Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz

Scharnhorststr. 34-37, 10115 Berlin

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

      ( print page 77574)    

# TIME AND DATE: 

2:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 26, 2024.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: September 19, 2024.

Vanessa A. Countryman, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-21808 Filed 9-19-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
----

Appeal brought on 7 February 2005 (fax 2 February 2005) by Ferriere Nord SpA against the judgment delivered on 18 November 2004 by the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) in Case T-176/01 between Ferriere Nord SpA, supported by the Italian Republic, and the Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-49/05 P)

(2005/C 82/34)

Language of the case: Italian

An appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 November 2004 in Case T-176/01 between Ferriere Nord, supported by the Italian Republic, and the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 7 February 2005 by Ferriere Nord SpA, represented by W. Viscardini and G. Donà, avvocati.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The applicant claims that the Court of First Instance erred in:

----

(1)OJ L 310 of 28.11.2001, p. 22.

(2)OJ C 72 of 10.03.1994, p. 3.

----
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Luis Eduardo Perez * From the 104th District Court

a/k/a Eduardo Perez Alvarenga of Taylor County,

a/k/a Eduardo Martinez, Trial Court No. 21490B.

Vs. No. 11-21-00117-CR * July 30, 2021

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has considered the motion to dismiss this appeal filed by Luis 

Eduardo Perez a/k/a Eduardo Perez Alvarenga a/k/a Eduardo Martinez and 

concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
[No. 24711-9-II.

Division Two.

December 8, 2000.]

#### Edward L. Danzer, *Appellant,*v. The Department of Labor and Industries, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 98-2-00095-1, Wm. Thomas McPhee, J., entered April 30, 1999. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Houghton, J., and Williams, J. Pro Tern. Now published at 104 Wn. App. 307.
# Exhibit 25

# Power of Attorney Concerning Form 10-K Fiscal December 31, 2003

Each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints CURTIS R. JACKELS his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him and in his name, place, and stead, in any and all capacities to sign the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and any
or all amendments to such Annual Report on other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or
his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
thereof.

|Signature                                                                           | Date
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----
|/s/   Curtis R. Jackels, Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Director |     
|/s/   John R. Helmen, Chairman                                                      |     
|/s/   James R. Loomis, Director                                                     |     
|/s/   Richard P. Kiphart, Director                                                  |     
|/s/   Scott S. Meyers, Director                                                     |     
|/s/   John McMillan, Director                                                       |     

40

---
Exhibit 21


                        PECO Energy Company Subsidiaries
                           and State of Incorporation
                              At December 31, 1995


PECO Energy Power Company - Incorporated in Pennsylvania
 
Susquehanna Power Company - Incorporated in Maryland

PECO Energy Capital Corp. - Incorporated in Delaware

PECO Gas Supply Company - Incorporated in Pennsylvania

PECO Wireless, Inc. - Incorporated in Pennsylvania

The Proprietors of the Susquehanna Canal (Inactive)- Incorporated in Maryland
 
Susquehanna Electric Company - Incorporated in Maryland

Eastern Pennsylvania Development Company - Incorporated in Pennsylvania

Adwin (Schuylkill) Cogeneration, Inc. - Incorporated in Pennsylvania

Adwin Equipment Company - Incorporated in Pennsylvania

Adwin Realty Company  - Incorporated in Pennsylvania

Adwin Investment Company  - Incorporated in Delaware

Buttonwood Associates, Inc.  - Incorporated in Delaware

Energy Performance Services, Inc.  - Incorporated In Pennsylvania

Eastern Pennsylvania Exploration Company  - Incorporated in Pennsylvania
EX-10.1


 Exhibit 10.1 

FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO

 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (herein called this “Amendment”) is made and entered into to be effective as of
the 27th day of October, 2017, by and between Nuvo Riverside, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (herein called “Seller”), and SST IV Acquisitions, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (herein called “Purchaser”). 
 W I T N E S S E T H: 

WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser have heretofore entered into that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement dated on or about August 18, 2017
(herein called the “Contract”), respecting certain improved real property located at 10384 Riverside Drive, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33915, all as more particularly described in the Contract; and 

WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser desire to modify the Contract, all as more particularly set forth below. 

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Approval Period. Section 4.1.1 of the Contract
is hereby modified to provide that the Approval Period shall expire at 5:00 p.m. Central Time on December 14, 2017. 
 2.
Miscellaneous. 
 (a) Seller and Purchaser hereby ratify the Contract in accordance with its terms, as modified hereby. 

(b) To the extent not otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the
Contract. 
 (c) This Amendment shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns. 

(d) This Amendment may be executed in a number of identical counterparts. If so executed, each of such counterparts shall be deemed an original
for all purposes, and such counterparts shall, collectively, constitute one agreement. 
 (e) For purposes of this Amendment, signatures
delivered by facsimile or electronic mail shall be as binding as originals upon the parties so signing and delivering. 






 (f) In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the Contract,
the terms of this Amendment shall control. 
 (g) The captions and headings used in this Amendment are for convenience only and do not in any
way restrict, modify or amplify the terms of this Amendment or the Contract. 
 [Signature page to follow] 

  
 2 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year
first above written. 
  

			
	SELLER:
	
	 Nuvo Riverside, LLC,
 a Florida
limited liability company

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Gary Cardamone

	Name: Gary Cardamone
	Title:   Manager
	
	PURCHASER:
	
	 SST IV Acquisitions, LLC,
 a
Delaware limited liability company

		
	By:	 	 /s/ H. Michael Schwartz

	Name: H. Michael Schwartz
	Title:   Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 10.10**

**         SECONDAMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT**

        ThisSecond Amendment to Loan Agreement (this “Second Amendment”) is made andentered into as of the 31st day of October, 2003, by and between POWELL INDUSTRIES, INC.,a Nevada corporation (“Borrower”), and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a nationalbanking association (“Lender”). 

        WITNESSETH: 

        WHEREAS,pursuant to that certain Amended and Restated Loan Agreement (as heretofore amended, the“Loan Agreement”) dated October 25, 2001, Lender agreed to make certainloans to Borrower upon the terms and conditions therein contained; and 

        WHEREAS,pursuant to that certain First Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of September 30, 2002,Borrower and Lender modified and amended certain terms and provisions of the LoanAgreement; and 

        WHEREAS,Borrower and Lender desire to further modify and amend certain terms and provisions of theLoan Agreement. 

        NOW,THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which arehereby acknowledged, Borrower and Lender agree as follows: 

        1.                 Amendments to Loan Agreement. Subject to and upon the full and complete          satisfaction of the terms and conditions of numerical Section 3 below, the          Loan Agreement is amended and modified as follows: 

        1.1.                 The definition of the following term in Section 1.1 of the Loan Agreement is          deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted in place thereof: 

        “**TerminationDate**” shall mean the earlier to occur of (a) February 28, 2006, or (b)an Event of Default. 
        1.2.                 Section 3.1 of the Loan agreement is deleted in its entirety and the following          is substituted in place thereof: 

    RevolvingLoan.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,943
<SECURITIES>                                     6,721
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,183
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,306
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,302
<PP&E>                                         279,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                 158,355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 274,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,825
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,068
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   274,076
<SALES>                                        100,325
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,935
<CGS>                                           99,358
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   99,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,794
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,662)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,901)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,761)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,761)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.46)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

I, Ronald Rubin, the Chief Executive Officer of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (the Company), hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |        |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 1, 2011 |  |        |  | /s/ Ronald Rubin       
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Ronald Rubin           
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
NUMBER 13-14-00471-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS, RICHARD LEE WALLIS, RICHARD 

FREYMANN, AND MARK HUGHES

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion1 Per Curiam 

Relators, State Farm Lloyds, Richard Lee Wallis, Richard Freymann, and Mark 

Hughes, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court direct 

respondent, the Honorable Rose Guerra Reyna, Presiding Judge of the 206th District 

Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, to withdraw her order denying relators’ verified plea in 

abatement and to enter an order abating the suit for damages brought against relators by 

the real party in interest, Ascencion Martinez, until sixty days after he provides relators 

 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

with a notice letter for his claim stating the specific, separate amounts for the claimed 

damages and attorney’s fees. See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.154 (West, Westlaw 

through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Prior Notice of Action”); id. § 541.155 (West, Westlaw through 

2013 3d C.S.) (“Abatement”); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1 (“Commencement” of Original 

Proceedings). In addition, relators request that this Court issue immediate temporary 

relief staying respondent’s order denying the plea in abatement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.10 (“Temporary Relief”). 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus 

and the applicable law, is of the opinion that the petition for writ of mandamus should be 

denied for the reasons expressed in our opinion in In re State Farm Lloyds, Richard 

Freymann, and Nathan Burris, No. 13-14-00347-CV, 2014 WL _____ (Tex. App.—Corpus 

Christi Aug. 27, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.), available at

http://www.search.txcourts.gov/case.aspx?cn=13-14-00348-CV. Accordingly, the Court 

DENIES the petition for writ of mandamus and request for immediate temporary relief. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

2nd day of September, 2014.
Exhibit 23.1


                              Accountant's Consent

     The Board of Directors
     Payless Cashways, Inc.:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration  statement
     (No.  333-70557) on Form S-8 of Payless Cashways,  Inc. of our report dated
     January 12,  2001,  except as to Note I, which is as of January  31,  2001,
     relating to the balance sheets of Payless Cashways, Inc. as of November 25,
     2000  and  November  27,  1999,  the  related   statements  of  operations,
     stockholders'  equity,  and  cash  flows  for  each  of  the  years  in the
     three-year period ended November 25, 2000, and all related schedules, which
     report  appears in the  November  25,  2000  annual  report on Form 10-K of
     Payless Cashways, Inc.

                                 /S/   KPMG  LLP

     February 16, 2001