# Patent

## Title
Hot-rolled steel sheet, cold-rolled steel sheet, galvanized steel sheet, and methods of manufacturing the same

## Abstract

A hot-rolled steel sheet has an average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of a {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group at least in a sheet thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from a steel sheet surface of 1.0 to 6.0, an X-ray random intensity ratio of a {332} <113> crystal orientation of 1.0 to 5.0, rC which is an r value in a direction perpendicular to a rolling direction of 0.70 to 1.10, and r30 which is an r value in a direction that forms an angle of 30° with respect to the rolling direction of 0.70 to 1.10.

## Background
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to a hot-rolled steel sheet, a cold-rolled steel sheet, and a galvanized steel sheet which are excellent in terms of local deformability, such as bending, stretch flange, or a burring working, have a small orientation dependency of formability, and are used mainly for automobile components and the like, and methods of manufacturing the same. The hot-rolled steel sheet includes a hot-rolled strip that serves as a starting sheet for the cold-rolled steel sheet, the galvanized steel sheet, or the like.
Priority is claimed on Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-169670, filed Jul. 28, 2010, Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-169627, filed Jul. 28, 2010, Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-048236, filed Mar. 4, 2011, Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-169230, filed Jul. 28, 2010, Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-048272, filed Mar. 4, 2011, Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-204671, filed Sep. 13, 2010, Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-048246, filed Mar. 4, 2011, and Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-048253, filed Mar. 4, 2011, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND ART  
An attempt is being made to reduce the weight of an automobile frame through use of a high-strength steel sheet in order to suppress the amount of carbon dioxide exhausted from an automobile. In addition, a high-strength steel sheet as well as a soft steel sheet has been frequently used for automobile frames from the viewpoint of securing the safety of passengers. However, in order to further reduce the weight of an automobile frame in the future, it is necessary to increase the level of operational strength of a high-strength steel sheet compared to the related art.
However, in general, an increase in the strength of a steel sheet results in a decrease in the formability. For example, Non Patent Document 1 discloses that an increase in strength degrades uniform elongation which is important for drawing or stretch forming.
Therefore, in order to use a high-strength steel sheet for underbody components of an automobile frame, components that contribute to absorption of impact energy, and the like, it becomes important to improve local deformability, such as local ductility that contributes to formability, such as burring workability or bending workability.
In contrast to the above, Non Patent Document 2 discloses a method in which uniform elongation is improved by complexing the metallic structure of a steel sheet even when the strength is maintained at the same level.
In addition, Non Patent Document 3 discloses a metallic structure control method in which local deformability represented by bending properties, hole expanding workability, or buffing workability is improved through inclusion control, single structure formation, and, furthermore, a decrease in the hardness difference between structures. The above method is to improve hole expanding properties by forming a single structure through structure control, and, in order to form a single structure, a thermal treatment from an austenite single phase serves as the basis of the manufacturing method as described in Non Patent Document 4.
In addition, Non Patent Document 4 discloses a technique in which metallic structure is controlled through the control of cooling after hot rolling, and precipitates and deformed structures are controlled so as to obtain ferrite and bainite at an appropriate proportion, thereby satisfying both an increase in the strength and securement of ductility.
However, all of the above techniques are a method of improving local deformability through structure control, which is significantly influenced by base structure formation.
Meanwhile, even for improvement of material quality through an increase in the rolling reduction in a continuous hot rolling process, related art exists, which is a so-called grain refinement technique. For example, Non Patent Document 5 describes a technique in which large reduction is carried out at an extremely low temperature range in an austenite range, and non-recrystallized austenite is transformed into ferrite so that the crystal grains of ferrite which is the main phase of the product are refined, and the strength or toughness increases due to the grain refinement. However, Non Patent Document 5 pays no attention to improvement of local deformability which is the object of the present invention.
CITATION LIST
Non Patent Documents
[Non Patent Document 1] “Nippon Steel Corporation Technical Report,” by Kishida (1999) No. 371, p. 13
[Non Patent Document 2] “Trans. ISIJ,” by O. Matsumura et al. (1987) Vol. 27, P. 570
[Non Patent Document 3] “Steel-manufacturing studies,” by Kato et al. (1984) Vol. 312, p. 41
[Non Patent Document 4] “ISIJ International,” by K. Sugimoto et al. (2000) Vol. 40, p. 920
[Non Patent Document 5] NFG Catalog, Nakayama Steel Works, Ltd.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
Technical Problem
As described above, structure control including inclusion control was a main solution for improving the local deformability of a high-strength steel sheet. However, since the solution relied on structure control, it was necessary to control the proportion or form of structures, such as ferrite and bainite, and the base metallic structure was limited.
Therefore, in the present invention, control of a texture is employed instead of control of the base structure, and a hot-rolled steel sheet, a cold-rolled steel sheet, and a galvanized steel sheet which are excellent in terms of the local deformability of a high-strength steel sheet, and have a small orientation dependency of formability, and a method of manufacturing the same are provided by controlling the size or form of crystal grains and texture as well as the kinds of phases.
Solution to Problem
According to the knowledge in the related art, hole expanding properties, bending properties, and the like were improved through inclusion control, precipitation refinement, structure homogenization, formation of a single structure, a decrease in the hardness difference between structures, and the like. However, with the above techniques alone, the main structure composition will be limited. Furthermore, in a case in which Nb, Ti, and the like which are typical elements that significantly contribute to an increase in strength are added in order to increase the strength, since there is a concern that anisotropy may increase extremely, it is necessary to sacrifice other forming factors or limit the direction in which blanks are taken before forming, thereby limiting uses.
Therefore, the present inventors newly paid attention to the influence of the texture in a steel sheet in order to improve hole expanding properties or bending workability, and investigated and studied the effects in detail. As a result, the inventors clarified that local deformability is drastically improved by controlling the X-ray random intensity ratio of the respective orientations of a specific crystal orientation group from a hot rolling process, and, furthermore, controlling the r value in a rolling direction, the r value in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction, and the r value in a direction that forms an angle of 30° or 60° with respect to the rolling direction.
The present invention was constituted based on the above finding, and the present invention employed the following measures in order to solve the above problems and achieve the relevant object.
(1) That is, a hot-rolled steel sheet according to an aspect of the present invention contains, by mass %, C: 0.0001% to 0.40%, Si: 0.001% to 2.5%, Mn: 0.001% to 4.0%, P: 0.001% to 0.15%, S: 0.0005% to 0.03%, Al: 0.001% to 2.0%, N: 0.0005% to 0.01%, and O: 0.0005% to 0.01%, and further contains one or two or more of Ti: 0.001% to 0.20%, Nb: 0.001% to 0.20%, V: 0.001% to 1.0%, W: 0.001% to 1.0%, B: 0.0001% to 0.0050%, Mo: 0.001% to 1.0%, Cr: 0.001% to 2.0%, Cu: 0.001% to 2.0%, Ni: 0.001% to 2.0%, Co: 0.0001% to 1.0%, Sn: 0.0001% to 0.2%, Zr: 0.0001% to 0.2%, As: 0.0001% to 0.50%, Mg: 0.0001% to 0.010%, Ca: 0.0001% to 0.010%, and REM: 0.0001% to 0.1% and balance composed of iron and inevitable impurities, in which an average value of an X-ray random intensity ratio of a {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group at least in a thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from a steel sheet surface is 1.0 to 6.0, an X-ray random intensity ratio of a {332} <113> crystal orientation is 1.0 to 5.0, rC which is an r value in a direction perpendicular to a rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10, and r30 which is an r value in a direction that forms an angle of 30° with respect to the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10.
(2) In addition, in the aspect according to the above (1), furthermore, rL which is an r value in the rolling direction may be 0.70 to 1.10, and r60 which is an r value in a direction that forms an angle of 60° with respect to the rolling direction may be 0.70 to 1.10.
(3) In addition, in the aspect according to the above (1) or (2), furthermore, one or two or more of bainite, martensite, pearlite, and austenite are present in the hot-rolled steel sheet, and a proportion of grains having a dL/dt which is a ratio of a length in the rolling direction dL to a length of a sheet thickness direction dt of 3.0 or less in crystal grains in the structures may be 50% to 100%.
(4) In the aspect according to the above (1) or (2), an area proportion of crystal grains having a grain diameter of more than 20 μm in a total area of a metallic structure in the hot-rolled steel sheet may be 0% to 10%.
(5) A cold-rolled steel sheet according to an aspect of the present invention is a cold-rolled steel sheet obtained through cold rolling of the hot-rolled steel sheet according to the above (1), in which the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of a {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group at least in the thickness central portion is 1.0 to less than 4.0, the X-ray random intensity ratio of a {332} <113> crystal orientation is 1.0 to 5.0, rC which is the r value in a direction perpendicular to the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10, and r30 which is the r value in a direction that forms an angle of 30° with respect to the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10.
(6) In the aspect according to the above (5), rL which is an r value in the rolling direction may be 0.70 to 1.10, and r60 which is an r value in a direction that forms an angle of 60° with respect to the rolling direction may be 0.70 to 1.10.
(7) In the aspect according to the above (5) or (6), furthermore, one or two or more of bainite, martensite, pearlite, and austenite are present in the cold-rolled steel sheet, and a proportion of grains having a dL/dt which is a ratio of a length in the rolling direction dL to a length of a sheet thickness direction dt of 3.0 or less in crystal grains in the structures may be 50% to 100%.
(8) In the aspect according to the above (5) or (6), an area proportion of crystal grains having a grain diameter of more than 20 μm in a total area of a metallic structure in the cold-rolled steel sheet may be 0% to 10%.
(9) A galvanized steel sheet according to an aspect of the present invention is a galvanized steel sheet further having a galvanized coating layer or a galvanealed coating layer on a surface of the cold-rolled steel sheet according to the above (5), in which the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of a {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group at least in the thickness central portion is 1.0 to less than 4.0, the X-ray random intensity ratio of a {332} <113> crystal orientation is 1.0 to 5.0, rC which is the r value in a direction perpendicular to the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10, and r30 which is the r value in a direction that forms an angle of 30° with respect to the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10.
(10) In the aspect according to the above (9), rL which is an r value in the rolling direction may be 0.70 to 1.10, and r60 which is an r value in a direction that forms an angle of 60° with respect to the rolling direction may be 0.70 to 1.10.
(11) In a method of manufacturing the hot-rolled steel sheet according to an aspect of the present invention, first hot rolling in which an ingot or slab which contains, by mass %, C: 0.0001% to 0.40%, Si: 0.001% to 2.5%, Mn: 0.001% to 4.0%, P: 0.001% to 0.15%, S: 0.0005% to 0.03%, Al: 0.001% to 2.0%, N: 0.0005% to 0.01%, and O: 0.0005% to 0.01%, and further contains one or two or more of Ti: 0.001% to 0.20%, Nb: 0.001% to 0.20%, V: 0.001% to 1.0%, W: 0.001% to 1.0%, B: 0.0001% to 0.0050%, Mo: 0.001% to 1.0%, Cr: 0.001% to 2.0%, Cu: 0.001% to 2.0%, Ni: 0.001% to 2.0%, Co: 0.0001% to 1.0%, Sn: 0.0001% to 0.2%, Zr: 0.0001% to 0.2%, As: 0.0001% to 0.50%, Mg: 0.0001% to 0.010%, Ca: 0.0001% to 0.010%, and REM: 0.0001% to 0.1% and balance composed of iron and inevitable impurities is rolled at least once at a rolling reduction ratio of 20% or more is carried out in a temperature range of 1000° C. to 1200° C., an austenite grain diameter is set to 200 μm or less, second hot rolling in which a total of rolling reduction ratios is 50% or more is carried out in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., third hot rolling in which a total of rolling reduction ratios is less than 30% is carried out in a temperature range of T1° C. to T1+30° C., and hot rolling ends at an Ar3 transformation temperature or higher.
Here, T1 is a temperature determined by steel sheet components, and expressed by the following formula 1.

T1(° C.)=850+10×(C+N)×Mn+350×Nb+250×Ti+40×B+10×Cr+100×Mo+100×V  (Formula 1)

(12) In the aspect according to the above (11), in the second hot rolling in the temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., the ingot or slab may be rolled at least once at a rolling reduction ratio of 30% or more in a pass.
(13) In the aspect according to the above (11) or (12), in the first hot rolling in a temperature range of 1000° C. to 1200° C., the ingot or slab may be rolled at least twice at a rolling reduction ratio of 20% or more, and the austenite grain diameter may be set to 100 μm or less.
(14) In the aspect according to the above (11) or (12), in a case in which the pass in which the rolling reduction ratio is 30% or more in the temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. is defined as a large reduction pass, a waiting time t from completion of a final pass of the large reduction pass to initiation of cooling may employ a configuration that satisfies the following formula 2.

t1<t≦t1×2.5  (Formula 2)

Here, t1 is expressed by the following formula 3.

t1=0.001×((Tf−T1)×P1)2−0.109×((Tf−T1)×P1)+3.1  (Formula 3)

Here, Tf represents a temperature after the final pass, and P1 represents a rolling reduction ratio in the final pass.
(15) In the aspect according to the above (14), a temperature of the steel sheet may increase by 18° C. or less between the respective passes of the second hot rolling in the temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C.
(16) In a method of manufacturing the cold-rolled steel sheet according to an aspect of the present invention, after the end of the hot rolling at the Ar3 transformation temperature or higher, the hot-rolled steel sheet obtained through the method of manufacturing the hot-rolled steel sheet according to the above (11) is pickled, cold-rolled at 20% to 90%, annealed at a temperature range of 720° C. to 900° C. for a holding time of 1 second to 300 seconds, acceleration-cooled at a cooling rate of 10° C./s to 200° C./s from 650° C. to 500° C., and held at a temperature of 200° C. to 500° C.
(17) In the aspect according to the above (16), in the second hot rolling in the temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., rolling at a rolling reduction ratio of 30% or more in a pass may be carried out at least once.
(18) In the aspect according to the above (16) or (17), in the first hot rolling in the temperature range of 1000° C. to 1200° C., rolling at a rolling reduction ratio of 20% or more may be carried out at least twice, and the austenite grain diameter may be set to 100 μm or less.
(19) In the aspect according to the above (16) or (17), in a case in which the pass in which the rolling reduction ratio is 30% or more in the temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. is defined as a large reduction pass, a waiting time t from completion of a final pass of the large reduction pass to initiation of cooling may employ a configuration that satisfies the following formula 4.

t1≦t≦t1×2.5  (Formula 4)

Here, t1 is expressed by the following formula 5.

t1=0.001×((Tf−T1)×P1)2−0.109×((Tf−T1)×P1)+3.1  (Formula 5)

Here, Tf represents a temperature after the final pass, and P1 represents a rolling reduction ratio in the final pass.
(20) In the aspect according to the above (16) or (17), a temperature of the steel sheet may increase by 18° C. or less between the respective passes of the second hot rolling in the temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C.
(21) In a method of manufacturing the galvanized steel sheet according to an aspect of the present invention, after the end of the hot rolling at the Ar3 transformation temperature or higher, the hot-rolled steel sheet obtained through the method of manufacturing the hot-rolled steel sheet according to the above (11) is wound in a temperature range of 680° C. to room temperature, pickled, cold-rolled at 20% to 90%, heated to a temperature range of 650° C. to 900° C., annealed for a holding time of 1 second to 300 seconds, cooled at a cooling rate of 0.1° C./s to 100° C./s from 720° C. to 580° C., and a galvanizing treatment is carried out.
(22) In the aspect according to the above (21), in the second hot rolling in the temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., rolling at a rolling reduction ratio of 30% or more in a pass may be carried out at least once.
(23) In the aspect according to the above (21) or (22), in the first hot rolling in the temperature range of 1000° C. to 1200° C., rolling at a rolling reduction ratio of 20% or more may be carried out at least twice, and the austenite grain diameter may be set to 100 μM or less.
(24) In the aspect according to the above (21) or (22), in a case in which the pass in which the rolling reduction ratio is 30% or more in the temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. is defined as a large reduction pass, a waiting time t from completion of a final pass of the large reduction pass to initiation of cooling may employ a configuration that satisfies the following formula 6.

t1≦t≦t1×2.5  (Formula 6)

Here, t1 is expressed by the following formula 7.

t1=0.001×((Tf−T1)×P1)2−0.109×((Tf−T1)×P1)+3.1  (Formula 7)

Here, Tf represents a temperature after the final pass, and P1 represents a rolling reduction ratio in the final pass.
(25) In the aspect according to the above (24), a temperature of the steel sheet may increase by 18° C. or less between the respective passes of the second hot rolling in the temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
According to the present invention, without limiting the main structure components, it is possible to obtain a hot-rolled steel sheet, a cold-rolled steel sheet, and a galvanized steel sheet which have a small influence on anisotropy even when elements, such as Nb or Ti, are added, are excellent in terms of local deformability, and have a small orientation dependency of formability.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a view showing the relationship between the average value of an X-ray random intensity ratio of a {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of a hot-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 2 is a view showing the relationship between the average value of an X-ray random intensity ratio of a {332} <113> crystal orientation and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of the hot-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 3 is a view showing the relationship between rC which is an r value in a direction perpendicular to a rolling direction and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of the hot-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 4 is a view showing the relationship between r30 which is an r value in a direction that forms an angle of 30° with respect to the rolling direction and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of the hot-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 5 is a view showing the relationship between rL which is an r value in the rolling direction and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of the hot-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 6 is a view showing the relationship between r60 which is an r value in a direction that forms an angle of 60° with respect to the rolling direction and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of the hot-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 7 is a view showing the relationship between the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of a {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of a cold-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 8 is a view showing the relationship between the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of the cold-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 9 is a view showing the relationship between rC which is the r value in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of the cold-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 10 is a view showing the relationship between r30 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 30° with respect to the rolling direction and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of the cold-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 11 is a view showing the relationship between rL which is the r value in the rolling direction and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of the cold-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 12 is a view showing the relationship between r60 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 60° with respect to the rolling direction and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of the cold-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 13 is a view showing the relationship between the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of a {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of a galvanized steel sheet.
FIG. 14 is a view showing the relationship between the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of the galvanized steel sheet.
FIG. 15 is a view showing the relationship between rC which is the r value in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of the galvanized steel sheet.
FIG. 16 is a view showing the relationship between r30 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 30° with respect to the rolling direction and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of the galvanized steel sheet.
FIG. 17 is a view showing the relationship between rL which is the r value in the rolling direction and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of the galvanized steel sheet.
FIG. 18 is a view showing the relationship between r60 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 60° with respect to the rolling direction and the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of the galvanized steel sheet.
FIG. 19 is a view showing the relationship between the austenite grain diameter after rough rolling and rC which is the r value in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction in the hot-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 20 is a view showing the relationship between the austenite grain diameter after rough rolling and r30 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 30° with respect to the rolling direction in the hot-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 21 is a view showing the relationship between the number of times of rolling at a rolling reduction ratio of 20% or more in rough rolling and the austenite grain diameter after the rough rolling.
FIG. 22 is a view showing the relationship between a total rolling reduction ratio in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. and the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of a {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group in the hot-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 23 is a view showing the relationship between a total rolling reduction ratio in a temperature range of T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. and the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of a {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group in the hot-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 24 is a view showing the relationship between a total rolling reduction ratio in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. and the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation in the hot-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 25 is a view showing the relationship between a total rolling reduction ratio in a temperature range of T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. and the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation in the hot-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 26 is a view showing the relationship among a maximum temperature increase amount of the steel sheet between the respective passes during rolling in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., a waiting time from completion of a final pass of the large reduction pass to initiation of cooling in a case in which the pass in which the rolling reduction ratio is 30% or more in the temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. is defined as a large reduction pass, and rL which is the r value in the rolling direction in the hot-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 27 is a view showing the relationship among a maximum temperature increase amount of the steel sheet between the respective passes during rolling in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., a waiting time from completion of a final pass of the large reduction pass to initiation of cooling in a case in which the pass in which the rolling reduction ratio is 30% or more in the temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. is defined as a large reduction pass, and r60 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 60° with respect to the rolling direction in the hot-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 28 is a view showing the relationship between the austenite grain diameter after the rough rolling and rC which is the r value in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction in the cold-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 29 is a view showing the relationship between the austenite grain diameter after the rough rolling and r30 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 30° with respect to the rolling direction in the cold-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 30 is a view showing the relationship between the rolling reduction ratio of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. and the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of a {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group in the cold-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 31 is a view showing the relationship between the total rolling reduction ratio in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. and the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation in the cold-rolled steel sheet.
FIG. 32 is a view showing the relationship between the austenite grain diameter after the rough rolling and rC which is the r value in the perpendicular direction to the rolling direction in a galvanized steel sheet.
FIG. 33 is a view showing the relationship between the austenite grain diameter after the rough rolling and r30 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 30° with respect to the rolling direction in the galvanized steel sheet.
FIG. 34 is a view showing the relationship between the total rolling reduction ratio in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. and the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group in the galvanized steel sheet.
FIG. 35 is a view showing the relationship between the total rolling reduction ratio in a temperature range of T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. and the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group in the galvanized steel sheet.
FIG. 36 is a view showing the relationship between the total rolling reduction ratio in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. and the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation in the galvanized steel sheet.
FIG. 37 is a view showing the relationship between the total rolling reduction ratio in a temperature range of T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. and the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation in the galvanized steel sheet.
FIG. 38 is a view showing the relationship among a maximum temperature increase amount of the steel sheet between the respective passes during rolling in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., the waiting time from completion of a final pass of the large reduction pass to initiation of cooling in a case in which the pass in which the rolling reduction ratio is 30% or more in the temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. is defined as a large reduction pass, and rL which is the r value in the rolling direction in the galvanized steel sheet.
FIG. 39 is a view showing the relationship among a maximum temperature increase amount of the steel sheet between the respective passes during rolling in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., a waiting time from completion of a final pass of the large reduction pass to initiation of cooling in a case in which the pass in which the rolling reduction ratio is 30% or more in the temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. is defined as a large reduction pass, and r60 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 60° with respect to the rolling direction in the galvanized steel sheet.
FIG. 40 is a view showing the relationship between strength and hole expanding properties of the hot-rolled steel sheet of the embodiment and a comparative steel.
FIG. 41 is a view showing the relationship between strength and bending properties of the hot-rolled steel sheet of the embodiment and the comparative steel.
FIG. 42 is a view showing the relationship between strength and the anisotropy of formability of the hot-rolled steel sheet of the embodiment and the comparative steel.
FIG. 43 is a view showing the relationship between strength and hole expanding properties of the cold-rolled steel sheet of the embodiment and the comparative steel.
FIG. 44 is a view showing the relationship between strength and bending properties of the cold-rolled steel sheet of the embodiment and the comparative steel.
FIG. 45 is a view showing the relationship between strength and the anisotropy of formability of the cold-rolled steel sheet of the embodiment and the comparative steel.



DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail.
1. Regarding a Hot-Rolled Steel Sheet
(1) An average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of a {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group in a sheet thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the surface of a steel sheet, an X-ray random intensity ratio of a {332} <113> crystal orientation:
The average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of a {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group in a sheet thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the surface of the steel sheet is a particularly important characteristic value of the embodiment.
As shown in FIG. 1, if the average value of the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group is 6.0 or less when X-ray diffraction is carried out on a sheet surface in the sheet thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the surface of the steel sheet so that the intensity ratios of the respective orientations with respect to a random specimen are obtained, d/Rm which is a sheet thickness/minimum bending radius necessary for working of underbody components or skeleton components is 1.5 or more. Furthermore, in a case in which hole expanding properties or small limit bending characteristic is required, d/Rm is desirably 4.0 or less, and more desirably less than 3.0. When d/Rm is more than 6.0, the anisotropy of the mechanical characteristics of the steel sheet becomes extremely strong, and, consequently, even when local deformability in a certain direction improves, material qualities in directions different from the above direction significantly degrade, and therefore it becomes impossible for the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius to be greater than or equal to 1.5. In a case in which a cold-rolled steel sheet or hot-rolled strip which is a starting sheet for a galvanized steel sheet is used, the X-ray random intensity ratio is preferably less than 4.0.
Meanwhile, while it is difficult to realize in a current ordinary continuous hot rolling process, when the X-ray random intensity ratio becomes less than 1.0, there is a concern that local deformability may degrade.
Furthermore, due to the same reason, if the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation in the sheet thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the surface of the steel sheet is 5.0 or less as shown in FIG. 2, the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius necessary for working of underbody components is 1.5 or more. The sheet thickness/minimum bending radius is more desirably 3.0 or less. When the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius is more than 5.0, the anisotropy of the mechanical characteristics of the steel sheet becomes extremely strong, and, consequently, even when local deformability improves only in a certain direction, material qualities in directions different from the above direction significantly degrade, and therefore it becomes impossible for the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius to be greater than or equal to 1.5. Meanwhile, while it is difficult to realize in a current ordinary continuous hot rolling process, when the X-ray random intensity ratio becomes less than 1.0, there is a concern that the local deformability may degrade.
The reason is not absolutely evident why the X-ray random intensity ratio of the above crystal orientation is important for shape freezing properties during bending working, but it is assumed that the X-ray random intensity ratio of the crystal orientation has a relationship with the slip behavior of crystals during bending working.
(2) rC which is the r value in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction:
rC is important in the embodiment. That is, as a result of thorough studies, the inventors found that favorable hole expanding properties or bending properties cannot always be obtained even when only the X-ray random intensity ratios of the above variety of crystal orientations are appropriate. As shown in FIG. 3, in addition to the X-ray random intensity ratio, rC should be 0.70 or more.
When the upper limit of rC is set to 1.10, more favorable local deformability can be obtained.
(3) r30 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 30° with respect to the rolling direction:
r30 is important in the embodiment. That is, as a result of thorough studies, the inventors found that favorable local deformability cannot be always obtained even when only the X-ray random intensity ratios of the above variety of crystal orientations are appropriate. As shown in FIG. 4, in addition to the X-ray random intensity ratio, r30 should be 1.10 or less.
When the lower limit of r30 is set to 0.70, more favorable local deformability can be obtained.
(4) rL which is the r value in the rolling direction and r60 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 60° with respect to the rolling direction:
Furthermore, as a result of thorough studies, the inventors found that, in addition to the X-ray random intensity ratios of the above variety of crystal orientations, rC, and r30, when, furthermore, rL in the rolling direction is 0.70 or more, and r60 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 60° with respect to the rolling direction is 1.10 or less as shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius 2.0 is satisfied.
When the rL value and the r60 value are set to 1.10 or less and 0.70 or more, respectively, more favorable local deformability can be obtained.
Meanwhile, generally, it is known that there is a correlation between a texture and the r value, but in the hot-rolled steel sheet according to the embodiment, the limitation on the X-ray intensity ratio of the crystal orientation and the limitation on the r value are not identical to each other, and favorable local deformability cannot be obtained as long as both limitations are satisfied at the same time.
(5) dL/dt ratios of bainite, martensite, pearlite, and austenite grains:
As a result of further investigating local deformability, the inventors found that, when the texture and the r value are satisfied, and further the equiaxed properties of crystal grains are excellent, the direction dependency of bending working almost disappears. As an index that indicates the equiaxed properties, the fraction of grains that have a dL/dt which is a ratio of dL which is the length of crystal grains in the structure in the hot-rolling direction to dt which is the length in the sheet thickness direction of 3.0 or less, and are excellent in terms of equiaxed properties is 50% to 100% in the crystal grains. When the fraction is less than 50%, bending properties R in an L direction which is the rolling direction or a C direction which is the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction degrade.
The respective structures can be determined as follows.
Pearlite is specified through structure observation using an optical microscope. Next, a crystal structure is determined using an electron back scattering diffraction (EBSD), and a crystal having an fcc structure is determined to be austenite. Ferrite, bainite, and martensite having a bcc structure can be recognized through Kernel Average Misorientation with which EBSP-OIMTM is equipped, that is, through a KAM method. In the KAM method, among measurement data, the orientation differences of 6 closest pixels of a regular hexagonal pixel, of 12 second closest pixels outside the closest pixels, or of 18 third closest pixels outside the second closest pixels are averaged, and a value is computed by carrying out calculation in which the averaged value is used as the value of the central pixel on the respective pixels. A map that represents an orientation change in a grain can be prepared by carrying out the calculation within grain boundaries. The map represents a distribution of strain based on the local orientation change in the grain.
In the examples of the present invention, as a condition under which the orientation difference between adjacent pixels in EBSP-OIMTM is calculated, the orientation difference was set to 5° or less with respect to the third closest pixel, and a pixel having an orientation difference with respect to the third closet pixel of more than 1° was defined as bainite or martensite which is a product of low-temperature transformation, and a pixel having an orientation difference with respect to the third closet pixel of 1° or less was defined as ferrite. This is because polygonal pro-eutectic ferrite transformed at a high temperature is generated through diffusion transformation, and therefore the dislocation density is small, and strain in the grain is small so that the difference of crystal orientations in the grain is small, and the ferrite volume fraction obtained from a variety of investigations that the inventors have carried out using optical microscope observation and the area fraction obtained at an orientation difference with respect to a third closest pixel of 1° measured through the KAM method, approximately match.
(6) Fraction of crystal grains having a grain diameter of more than 20 μm:
Furthermore, it was found that the bending properties are strongly influenced by the equiaxed properties of crystal grains, and the effect is large. The reasons are not evident, but it is considered that a mode of bending deformation is a mode in which strain locally concentrates, and a state in which all crystal grains are uniformly and equivalently strained is advantageous for bending properties. It is considered that, in a case in which there are many crystal grains having a large grain diameter, even when crystal grains are sufficiently made to be isotropic and equiaxed, crystal grains locally strain, and a large variation appears in the bending properties due to the orientation of the locally strained crystal grains such that degradation of the bending properties is caused. Therefore, in order to suppress localization of strain and improve the bending properties by the effect of being made isotropic and equiaxed, the area fraction of crystal grains having a grain diameter of more than 20 μm is preferably smaller, and needs to be 0% to 10%. When the area fraction is larger than 10%, the bending properties deteriorate. The crystal grains mentioned herein refer to crystal grains of ferrite, pearlite, bainite, martensite, and austenite.
The present invention is generally applicable to hot-rolled steel sheets, and, as long as the above limitations are satisfied, local deformability, such as the bending workability or hole expanding properties of a hot-rolled steel sheet, drastically improves without the limitation on combination of structures.
2. Regarding a Cold-Rolled Steel Sheet
(1) An average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of a {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group in a sheet thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the surface of a steel sheet, and an X-ray random intensity ratio of a {332} <113> crystal orientation:
The average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of a {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group in a sheet thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the surface of the steel sheet is particularly important the embodiment.
As shown in FIG. 7, if the average value of the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group is less than 4.0 when an X-ray diffraction is carried out on a sheet surface in the sheet thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the surface of the steel sheet so that the intensity ratios of the respective orientations with respect to a random specimen are obtained, a sheet thickness/minimum bending radius necessary for working of skeleton components is 1.5 or more. Furthermore, in a case in which hole expanding properties or a small limit bending characteristic is required, the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius is desirably less than 3.0. When the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius is 4.0 or more, the anisotropy of the mechanical characteristics of the steel sheet becomes extremely strong, and, consequently, even when local deformability in a certain direction improves, material qualities in directions different from the above direction significantly degrade, and therefore it becomes impossible for the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius to be greater than or equal to 1.5.
Meanwhile, while it is difficult to realize in a current ordinary continuous hot rolling process, when the X-ray random intensity ratio becomes less than 1.0, there is a concern that local deformability may degrade.
Furthermore, due to the same reason, if the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation in the sheet thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the surface of the steel sheet is 5.0 or less as shown in FIG. 8, the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius necessary for working of skeleton components is 1.5 or more. The sheet thickness/minimum bending radius is more desirably 3.0 or less. When the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius is more than 5.0, the anisotropy of the mechanical characteristics of the steel sheet becomes extremely strong, and, consequently, even when local deformability improves only in a certain direction, material qualities in directions different from the above direction significantly degrade, and therefore it becomes impossible for the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius to be greater than or equal to 1.5. Meanwhile, while it is difficult to realize in a current ordinary continuous hot rolling process, when the X-ray random intensity ratio becomes less than 1.0, there is a concern that local deformability may degrade.
The reason is not absolutely evident why the X-ray random intensity ratio of the above crystal orientation is important for shape freezing properties during bending working, but it is assumed that the X-ray random intensity ratio of the crystal orientation has a relationship with the slip behavior of crystals during bending working.
(2) rC which is the r value in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction:
rC is important in the embodiment. That is, as a result of thorough studies, the inventors found that favorable hole expanding properties or bending properties cannot be always obtained even when only the X-ray random intensity ratios of the above variety of crystal orientations are appropriate. As shown in FIG. 9, in addition to the X-ray random intensity ratio, rC should be 0.70 or more.
When the upper limit of rC is set to 1.10, more favorable local deformability can be obtained.
(3) r30 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 30° with respect to the rolling direction:
r30 is important in the embodiment. That is, as a result of thorough studies, the inventors found that favorable local deformability cannot be always obtained even when only the X-ray random intensity ratios of the above variety of crystal orientations are appropriate. As shown in FIG. 10, in addition to the X-ray random intensity ratio, r30 should be 1.10 or less.
When the lower limit of r30 is set to 0.70, more favorable local deformability can be obtained.
(4) rL which is the r value in the rolling direction and r60 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 60° with respect to the rolling direction:
Furthermore, as a result of thorough studies, the inventors found that, in addition to the X-ray random intensity ratios of the above variety of crystal orientations, rC, and r30, when, furthermore, rL in the rolling direction is 0.70 or more, and r60 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 60° with respect to the rolling direction is 1.10 or less as shown in FIGS. 11 and 12, the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius is equal to or greater than 2.0.
When the rL and the r60 are set to 1.10 or less and 0.70 or more respectively, more a favorable local deformability can be obtained.
Meanwhile, generally, it is known that there is a correlation between a texture and the r value, in the cold-rolled steel sheet according to the embodiment, the limitation on the X-ray intensity ratio of the crystal orientation and the limitation on the r value are not identical to each other, and favorable local deformability cannot be obtained as long as both limitations are satisfied at the same time.
(5) dL/dt ratios of bainite, martensite, pearlite, and austenite grains:
As a result of further investigating local deformability, the inventors found that, when the texture and the r value are satisfied, and further the equiaxed properties of crystal grains are excellent, the direction dependency of bending working almost disappears. As an index that indicates the equiaxed properties, it is important that the fraction of grains that have a dL/dt, which is a ratio of dL which is the length of crystal grains in the structure in the cold-rolling direction to dt which is the length in the sheet thickness direction, of 3.0 or less, and are excellent in terms of equiaxed properties is 50% to 100% in the crystal grains. When the fraction is less than 50%, bending properties R in an L direction which is the rolling direction or in a C direction which is the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction degrade.
The respective structures can be determined as follows.
Pearlite is specified through structure observation using an optical microscope. Next, a crystal structure is determined using electron back scattering diffraction (EBSD), and a crystal having an fcc structure is determined to be austenite. Ferrite, bainite, and martensite having a bcc structure can be recognized through Kernel Average Misorientation with which EBSP-OIMTM is equipped, that is, through a KAM method. In the KAM method, among measurement data, the orientation differences of 6 closest pixels of a regular hexagonal pixel, of 12 second closest pixels outside the closest pixels, or of 18 third closest pixels outside the second closest pixels are averaged, and a value is computed by carrying out calculation in which the averaged value is used as the value of the central pixel on the respective pixels. A map that represents an orientation change in a grain can be prepared by carrying out the calculation within grain boundaries. The map represents a distribution of strain based on the local orientation change in the grain.
In the examples of the present invention, as a condition under which the orientation difference between adjacent pixels in EBSP-OIMTM, the orientation difference was set to 5° or less with respect to the third closest pixel, and a pixel having an orientation difference with respect to the third closet pixel of more than 1° was defined as bainite or martensite which is a product of low-temperature transformation, and a pixel having an orientation difference with respect to the third closet pixel of 1° or less was defined as ferrite. This is because polygonal pro-eutectic ferrite transformed at a high temperature is generated through diffusion transformation, and therefore the dislocation density is small, and strain in the grain is small so that the difference of crystal orientations in the grain is small, and the ferrite volume fraction obtained from a variety of investigations that the inventors have carried out using optical microscope observation and the area fraction obtained at an orientation difference third closest pixel of 1° measured through the KAM method approximately match.
(6) Fraction of crystal grains having a grain diameter of more than 20 μm:
Furthermore, it was found that the bending properties are strongly influenced by the equiaxed properties of crystal grains, and the effect is large. The reasons are not evident, but it is considered that bending deformation is a mode in which strain locally concentrates, and a state in which all crystal grains are uniformly and equivalently strained is advantageous for bending properties. It is considered that, in a case in which there are many crystal grains having a large grain diameter, even when crystal grains are sufficiently made to be isotropic and equiaxed, crystal grains locally strain, and a large variation appears in the bending properties due to the orientation of the locally strained crystal grains such that degradation in the bending properties is caused. Therefore, in order to suppress localization of strain and improve the bending properties through the effect of making isotropic and equiaxed, the area fraction of crystal grains having a grain diameter of more than 20 μm is preferably smaller, and needs to be 0% to 10%. When the area fraction is larger than 10%, the bending properties deteriorate. The crystal grains mentioned herein refer to crystal grains of ferrite, pearlite, bainite, martensite, and austenite.
The present invention is generally applicable to cold-rolled steel sheets, and, as long as the above limitations are satisfied, local deformability, such as the bending workability or hole expanding properties of a cold-rolled steel sheet, drastically improves without limitation on combination of structures.
3. Regarding a Galvanized Steel Sheet
(1) An average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of a {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group in a sheet thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the surface of a steel sheet, an X-ray random intensity ratio of a {332} <113> crystal orientation:
The average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of a {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group in a sheet thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the surface of the steel sheet is particularly important in the embodiment. As shown in FIG. 13, if the average value of the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group is less than 4.0 when an X-ray diffraction is carried out on a sheet surface in the sheet thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the surface of the steel sheet so that the intensity ratios of the respective orientations with respect to a random specimen are obtained, a sheet thickness/minimum bending radius necessary for working of underbody components or skeleton components is 1.5 or more. Furthermore, in a case in which hole expanding properties or a small limit bending characteristic is required, the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius is desirably less than 3.0. When the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius is 4.0 or more, the anisotropy of the mechanical characteristics of the steel sheet becomes extremely strong, and, consequently, even when local deformability in a certain direction improves, material qualities in directions different from the above direction significantly degrade, and therefore it becomes impossible for the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius to be greater than or equal to 1.5.
Meanwhile, while it is difficult to realize in a current ordinary continuous hot rolling process, when the X-ray random intensity ratio becomes less than 1.0, there is a concern that local deformability may degrade.
Furthermore, due to the same reason, if the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation in the sheet thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the surface of the steel sheet is 5.0 or less as shown in FIG. 14, the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius necessary for working of underbody components is 1.5 or more. The sheet thickness/minimum bending radius is more desirably 3.0 or less. When the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius is more than 5.0, the anisotropy of the mechanical characteristics of the steel sheet becomes extremely strong, and, consequently, even when local deformability improves only in a certain direction, material qualities in directions different from the above direction significantly degrade, and therefore it becomes impossible to reliably satisfy the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius ≧1.5. Meanwhile, while it is difficult to realize in a current ordinary continuous hot rolling process, when the X-ray random intensity ratio becomes less than 1.0, there is a concern that local deformability may degrade.
The reason is not absolutely evident why the X-ray random intensity ratio of the above crystal orientation is important for shape freezing properties during bending working, but it is assumed that the X-ray random intensity ratio of the crystal orientation has a relationship with the slip behavior of crystals during bending working.
rC which is the r value in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction:
rC is important in the embodiment. That is, as a result of thorough studies, the inventors found that favorable hole expanding properties or bending properties cannot be always obtained even when only the X-ray random intensity ratios of the above variety of crystal orientations are appropriate. As shown in FIG. 15, in addition to the X-ray random intensity ratio, rC should be 0.70 or more.
When the upper limit of rC is set to 1.10, more favorable local deformability can be obtained.
r30 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 30° with respect to the rolling direction:
r30 is important in the embodiment. That is, as a result of thorough studies, the inventors found that favorable hole expanding properties or bending properties cannot be always obtained even when only the X-ray random intensity ratios of the above variety of crystal orientations are appropriate. As shown in FIG. 16, in addition to the X-ray random intensity ratio, r30 should be 1.10 or less.
When the lower limit of r30 is set to 0.70, more favorable local deformability can be obtained.
rL which is the r value in the rolling direction, and r60 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 60° with respect to the rolling direction:
Furthermore, as a result of thorough studies, the inventors found that, in addition to the X-ray random intensity ratios of the above variety of crystal orientations, rC, and r30, when, furthermore, rL in the rolling direction is 0.70 or more, and r60 which is the r value in the direction that forms an angle of 60° with respect to the rolling direction is 1.10 or less as shown in FIGS. 17 and 18, the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius will be greater than or equal to 2.0.
When the rL value and the r60 value are set to 1.10 or less and 0.70 or more, respectively, more favorable local deformability can be obtained.
Meanwhile, generally, it is known that there is a correlation between a texture and the r value, in the galvanized steel sheet according to the present invention, the limitation on the X-ray intensity ratio of the crystal orientation and the limitation on the r value are not identical to each other, and favorable local deformability cannot be obtained as long as both limitations are not satisfied at the same time.
The present invention is generally applicable to galvanized steel sheets, and, as long as the above limitations are satisfied, local deformability, such as the bending workability or hole expanding properties of a galvanized steel sheet, drastically improves without limitation on a combination of structures.
Main orientations included in the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group are {100} <011>, {116} <110>, {114} <110>, {113} <110>, {112} <110>, {335}<110>, and {223} <110>.
The X-ray random intensity ratios of the respective orientations can be measured using a method, such as X-ray diffraction or electron back scattering diffraction (EBSD). Specifically, the X-ray random intensity may be obtained from a 3-dimensional texture computed through a vector method based on the {110} pole figure or a 3-dimensional texture computed through a series expansion method using a plurality of pole figures (preferably three or more) among {110}, {100}, {211}, and {310} pole figures.
For example, as the X-ray random intensity ratios of the respective crystal orientations in the EBSD method, the intensities of (001) [1-10], (116) [1-10], (114) [1-10], (113) [1-10], (112) [1-10], (335) [1-10], and (223) [1-10] in φ2=45° cross section of a 3-dimensional texture may be used as they are. The 1 with bar above which indicates negative 1 is expressed by −1.
In addition, the average value of the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group is the arithmetic average of the respective orientations. In a case in which the intensities of all of the above orientations cannot be obtained, the intensities may be replaced with the arithmetic average of the respective orientations of {100} <011>, {116} <110>, {114} <110>, {112} <110>, and {223} <110>.
For measurement, a specimen provided for X-ray diffraction or EBSD is subjected to mechanical polishing or the like so that the steel sheet is reduced from the surface to be a predetermined sheet thickness, next, strain is removed through chemical polishing or electrolytic polishing, and, at the same time, the specimen is adjusted through the above method so that an appropriate surface in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 becomes a measurement surface. The specimen is desirably taken from a location of a 1⁄4 or 3⁄4 width from the end portion in the sheet width direction.
It is needless to say that, when the limitation on the X-ray intensity is satisfied not only at the vicinity of 1⁄2 of the sheet thickness but also at as many thicknesses as possible, local deformability becomes more favorable. However, since, generally, the material characteristics of the entire steel sheet can be represented by measuring the sheet thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the surface of the steel sheet, the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratios of the {100}<011> to {223} <110> orientation group in the sheet thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the surface of the steel sheet and the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation are specified. The crystal orientation that is represented by {hkl} <uvw> indicates that the normal direction of the sheet surface is parallel with {hkl}, and the rolling direction is parallel to <uvw>.
In addition, the respective r values are evaluated through tensile tests in which JIS No. 5 tensile test specimens are used. In the case of a high-strength steel sheet, tensile strain may be evaluated in a range of 5% to 15% using a range of uniform elongation.
Since a direction in which bending working is carried out varies by components to be worked, the direction is not particularly limited; however, according to the present invention, the same characteristics can be obtained in all bending directions.
The dL/dt and grain diameter of pearlite can be obtained through a binarization and a point counter method in structure observation using an optical microscope.
In addition, the grain diameters of ferrite, bainite, martensite, and austenite can be obtained by measuring orientations, for example, at a magnification of 1500 times and a measurement step (pitch) of 0.5 μm or less in an analysis of steel sheet orientations through the EBSD method, specifying locations at which the orientation difference between adjacent measurement points exceeds 15° as grain boundaries, and obtaining a diameter of the equivalent circle. At this time, the lengths of a grain in the rolling direction and the sheet thickness direction are obtained at the same time, thereby obtaining dL/dt.
Next, conditions for limiting the steel sheet components will be described. % for contents is mass %.
Since the cold-rolled steel sheet and galvanized steel sheet of the present invention use the hot-rolled steel sheet of the present invention as a raw sheet, the components of a steel sheet will be as follows for all of the hot-rolled steel sheet, the cold-rolled steel sheet, and the galvanized steel sheet.
C is a basically included element, and the reason why the lower limit is set to 0.0001% is to use the lower limit value obtained from practical steel. When the upper limit exceeds 0.40%, workability or weldability deteriorates, and therefore the upper limit is set to 0.40%. Meanwhile, since excessive addition of C significantly deteriorates spot weldability, the upper limit is more desirably set to 0.30% or lower.
Si is an effective element for enhancing the mechanical strength of a steel sheet, and, when the content exceeds 2.5%, workability deteriorates, or surface defects are generated, and therefore the upper limit is set to 2.5%. On the other hand, since it is difficult to include Si at less than 0.001% in practical steel, the lower limit is set to 0.001%.
Mn is an effective element for enhancing the mechanical strength of a steel sheet, and, when the content exceeds 4.0%, the workability deteriorates, and therefore the upper limit is set to 4.0%. On the other hand, since it is difficult to include Mn at less than 0.001% in practical steel, the lower limit is set to 0.001%. However, in order to avoid an extreme increase in steel-manufacturing costs, the lower limit is desirably set to 0.01% or more. Since Mn suppresses generation of ferrite, in a case in which it is intended to include a ferrite phase in a structure so as to secure elongation, the lower limit is desirably set to 3.0% or less. In addition, in a case in which, other than Mn, elements which suppress generation of hot cracking caused by S, such as Ti, are not added, Mn is desirably added at an amount so that Mn/S becomes equal to or larger than 20 in terms of mass %.
The upper limits of P and S are 0.15% or less and 0.03% or less respectively in order to prevent deterioration of workability or cracking during hot rolling or cold rolling. The respective lower limits are set to 0.001% for P and 0.0005% for S which are values obtainable through current ordinary purification (including secondary purification). Meanwhile, since extreme desulfurization significantly increases the costs, the lower limit of S is more desirably 0.001% or more.
For deoxidizing, Al is added at 0.001% or more. However, in a case in which sufficient deoxidizing is required, Al is more desirably added at 0.01% or more. In addition, since Al significantly increases the γ→α transformation point from γ to α, Al is an effective element in a case in which hot rolling particularly at Ar3 point or lower is oriented. However, when Al is excessive, weldability deteriorates, and therefore the upper limit is set to 2.0%.
N and O are impurities, and are both set to 0.01% or less so as to prevent workability from degrading. The lower limits are set to 0.0005% which is a value obtainable through current ordinary purification (including secondary purification) for both elements. However, the contents of N and O are desirably set to 0.001% or more in order to suppress an extreme increase in steel-manufacturing costs.
Furthermore, in order to enhance the mechanical strength through precipitation strengthening, or to control inclusions or refine precipitates for improving local deformability, the steel sheet may contain one or two or more of any of Ti, Nb, B, Mg, REM, Ca, Mo, Cr, V. W, Cu, Ni, Co, Sn, Zr, and As which have been thus far used. In order to achieve precipitation strengthening, it is effective to generate fine carbonitrides, and addition of Ti, Nb, V, or W is effective. In addition, Ti, Nb, V, and W also have an effect of contributing to refinement of crystal grains as solid solution elements.
In order to obtain the effect of precipitation strengthening through addition of Ti, Nb, V, or W, it is necessary to add 0.001% or more of Ti, 0.001% or more of Nb, 0.001% or more of V, or 0.001% or more of W. In a case in which precipitation strengthening is particularly required, it is more desirable to add 0.01% or more of Ti, 0.005% or more of Nb, 0.01% or more of V, or 0.01% or more of W. Furthermore, Ti and Nb have an effect of improving material quality through mechanisms of fixation of carbon and nitrogen, structure control, fine grain strengthening, and the like in addition to precipitate strengthening. In addition, V is effective for precipitation strengthening, causes less degradation of local deformability induced from strengthening due to addition than Mo or Cr, and an effective addition element in a case in which a high strength and better hole expanding properties or bending properties are required. However, even when the above elements are excessively added, since the effect of an increase in strength is saturated, and, furthermore, recrystallization after hot rolling is suppressed such that it is difficult to control crystal orientation, it is necessary to add Ti and Nb at 0.20% or less and V and W at 1.0% or less. However, in a case in which elongation is particularly required, it is more desirable to include V at 0.50% or less and W at 0.50% or less.
In a case in which the hardenability of a structure is enhanced, and a second phase is controlled so as to secure strength, it is effective to add one or two or more of B, Mo, Cr, Cu, Ni, Co, Sn, Zr, and As. Furthermore, in addition to the above effect, B has an effect of improving material quality through mechanisms of fixation of carbon and nitrogen, structure control, fine grain strengthening, and the like. In addition, in addition to the effect of enhancing the mechanical strength, Mo and Cr have an effect of improving material quality.
In order to obtain the above effects, it is necessary to add B at 0.0001% or more, Mo, Cr, Ni, and Cu at 0.001% or more, and Co, Sn, Zr, and As at 0.0001% or more. However, in contrast, since excessive addition deteriorates workability, the upper limit of B is set to 0.0050%, the upper limit of Mo is set to 1.0%, the upper limits of Cr, Ni, and Cu are set to 2.0%, the upper limit of Co is set to 1.0%, the upper limits of Sn and Zr are set to 0.2%, and the upper limit of As is set to 0.50%. In a case in which there is a strong demand for workability, it is desirable to set the upper limit of B to 0.005% and the upper limit of Mo to 0.50%. In addition, it is more desirable to select B, Mo, Cr, and As among the above addition elements from the viewpoint of costs.
Mg, REM, and Ca are important addition elements that detoxify inclusions and further improve local deformability. The lower limits for obtaining the above effect are 0.0001% respectively; however, in a case in which it is necessary to control the shapes of inclusions, Mg, REM, and Ca are desirably added at 0.0005% or more respectively. Meanwhile, since excessive addition results in degradation of cleanness, the upper limits of Mg, REM, and Ca are set to 0.010%, 0.1%, and 0.010% respectively.
The effect of improving local deformability is not lost even when a surface treatment is carried out on the hot-rolled steel sheet and cold-rolled steel sheet of the present invention, and the effects of the present invention can be obtained even when any of electroplating, hot dipping, deposition plating, organic membrane formation, film laminating, an organic salts/inorganic salts treatment, non-chromium treatment, and the like is carried out.
In addition, the galvanized steel sheet of the present invention has a galvanized layer by carrying out a galvanizing treatment on the surface of the cold-rolled steel sheet of the present invention, and galvanizing can obtain the effects both in hot dip galvanizing and electrogalvanizing. In addition, the galvanized steel sheet of the present invention may be produced as a zinc alloy-plated steel sheet mainly used for automobiles by carrying out an alloying treatment after galvanizing.
Additionally, the effects of the present invention are not lost even when a surface treatment is further carried out on the high-strength galvanized steel sheet of the present invention, and the effects of the present invention can be obtained even when any of electroplating, hot dipping, deposition plating, organic membrane formation, film laminating, an organic salts/inorganic salts treatment, non-chromium treatment, and the like is carried out.
2. Regarding the Manufacturing Method
Next, the method of manufacturing a hot-rolled steel sheet according to the embodiment will be described.
In order to realize excellent local deformability, it is important to form a texture having a predetermined X-ray random intensity ratio, satisfy the conditions for the r values in the respective directions, and control the grain shapes. Details of the manufacturing conditions for satisfying the above will be described below.
A manufacturing method preceding hot rolling is not particularly limited. That is, subsequent to ingoting using a blast furnace, an electric furnace, or the like, a variety of secondary purifications are carried out, then, the ingot may be cast through a method, such as ordinary continuous casting, an ingot method, or thin slab casting. In the case of continuous casting, the ingot may be once cooled to a low temperature, reheated, and then hot-rolled, or a cast slab may also be hot-rolled as it is after casting without cooling the cast slab to a low temperature. Scraps may be used as a raw material.
The hot-rolled steel sheet according to the embodiment is obtained in a case in which the following conditions are satisfied.
In order to satisfy the above predetermined values of rC of 0.70 or more and r30 of 1.10 or less, the austenite grain diameter after rough rolling, that is, before finishing rolling is important. As shown in FIGS. 19 and 20, the austenite grain diameter before finishing rolling may be 200 μm or less.
In order to obtain an austenite grain diameter before finishing rolling of 200 μm or less, in the rough rolling, it is necessary to carry out rolling in a temperature range of 1000° C. to 1200° C. and carry out rolling once or more at a rolling reduction ratio of at least 20% or more in the temperature range as shown in FIG. 21. However, in order to further enhance homogeneity and enhance elongation and local deformability, it is desirable to carry out rolling once or more at a rolling reduction ratio of at least 40% or more in a temperature range of 1000° C. to 1200° C.
The austenite grain diameter is more desirably set to 100 μm or less, and, in order to achieve the austenite grain diameter of 100 μm or less, it is desirable to carry out rolling twice or more at a rolling reduction ratio of 20% or more. Desirably, rolling is carried out twice or more at a rolling reduction ratio of 40% or more. As the rolling reduction ratio and the number of times of rolling increase, smaller grains can be obtained, but there is a concern that the temperature may decrease or scales may be excessively generated when the rolling exceeds 70% or the number of times of the rough rolling exceeds 10 times. As such, a decrease in the austenite grain diameter before finishing rolling is effective to improve local deformability through acceleration of recrystallization of austenite during subsequent finishing rolling, particularly through control of rL or r30.
The reason why refinement of the austenite grain diameter has an influence on local deformability is assumed to be that austenite grain boundaries after the rough rolling, that is, austenite grain boundaries before the finishing rolling function as one of recrystallization nuclei during the finishing rolling.
In order to confirm the austenite grain diameter after the rough rolling, it is desirable to cool a sheet piece that is about to be finishing-rolled as rapidly as possible. The sheet piece is cooled at a cooling rate of 10° C./s or more, the structure on the cross section of the sheet piece is etched, austenite grain boundaries are made to appear, and the austenite grain diameter is measured using an optical microscope. At this time, the austenite grain diameter is measured at a magnification of 50 times or more at 20 sites or more through an image analysis or a point counter method.
In addition, in order to achieve an average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group in a thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the steel sheet surface and an X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation in the above value ranges, based on the T1 temperature described in the formula 1 which is determined by the steel sheet components in the finishing rolling after the rough rolling, working is carried out at a large rolling reduction ratio in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., desirably in a temperature range of T1+50° C. to T1+100° C., and working is carried out at a small rolling reduction ratio in a temperature range of T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. According to the above, the local deformability and shape of a final hot-rolled product can be secured. FIGS. 22 to 25 show the relationships between the rolling reduction ratios in the respective temperature ranges and the X-ray random intensity ratios of the respective orientations.
That is, as shown in FIGS. 22 and 24, large reduction in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. and subsequent light rolling at T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. as shown in FIGS. 23 and 25 control the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group in a thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the steel sheet surface and the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation so as to drastically improve the local deformability of the final hot-rolled product.
The T1 temperature is experimentally obtained, and the inventors found from experiments that recrystallization in the austenite range of the respective steels is accelerated with the T1 temperature as a basis.
In order to obtain more favorable local deformability, it is important to accumulate strain through the large reduction or repeatedly recrystallize the structure every rolling. In order to accumulate strain, the total rolling reduction ratio is 50% or more, and desirably 70% or more, and, furthermore, an increase in the temperature of the steel sheet between passes is desirably set to 18° C. or lower. Meanwhile, the total rolling reduction of more than 90% is not desirable from the viewpoint of temperature securement or excessive rolling load. Furthermore, in order to enhance the homogeneity of a hot-rolled sheet, and enhance the local deformability to the extreme, among the rolling passes in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., at least one pass is carried out at a rolling reduction ratio of 30% or more, and desirably at 40% or more. Meanwhile, when the rolling reduction ratio exceeds 70% in a pass, there is a concern that the shape may be impaired. In a case in which there is a demand for more favorable workability, it is more desirable to set the rolling reduction ratio to 30% or more in the final 2 passes.
Furthermore, in order to accelerate uniform recrystallization through releasing of accumulated strain, it is necessary to suppress as much as possible the working amount in a temperature range of T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. after the large reduction at T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., and the total rolling rate at T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. is set to less than 30%. A rolling reduction ratio of 10% or more is desirable from the viewpoint of the sheet shape, but a rolling reduction ratio of 0% is desirable in a case in which local deformability matters more. When the rolling reduction ratio at T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. exceeds a predetermined range, recrystallized austenite grains are expanded, and, when the retention time is short, recrystallization does not sufficiently proceed, and the local deformability deteriorates. That is, in the manufacturing conditions according to the embodiment, it is important to uniformly and finely recrystallize austenite during finishing rolling so as to control the texture of a hot-rolled product in order to improve local deformability, such as hole expanding properties or bending properties.
When rolling is carried out at a lower temperature than the temperature range specified above or at a larger rolling reduction ratio than the specified rolling reduction ratio, the texture of austenite develops, and the X-ray random intensity ratios in the respective crystal orientations, such as the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {100}<011> to {223} <110> orientation group at least in a thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from a steel sheet surface of 6.0 or less and the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation of 5.0 or less, cannot be obtained in the finally obtained hot-rolled steel sheet.
Meanwhile, when rolling is carried out at a higher temperature than the specified temperature range or at a smaller rolling reduction ratio than the specified rolling reduction ratio, grain coarsening or duplex grains results, and the area fraction of crystal grains having a grain diameter of larger than 20 μm increases. Whether or not the above-specified rolling is carried out can be determined from rolling reduction ratio, rolling load, sheet thickness measurement, or the like through actual performance or calculation. In addition, since the temperature can be also measured if a thermometer is present between stands, and calculation simulation in which working heat generation and the like are considered from line speed, rolling reduction ratio, and the like is available, whether or not the above-specified rolling is carried out can be determined using either or both of temperature and calculation simulation.
The hot rolling carried out in the above manner ends at a temperature of Ar3 or higher. When the end temperature of the hot rolling is lower than Ar3, since two-phase region rolling in an austenite area and a ferrite area is included, accumulation into the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group becomes strong, and, consequently, local deformability significantly degrades.
As long as rL and r60 are 0.70 or more and 1.10 or less respectively, furthermore, favorable sheet thickness/minimum bending radius ≧2.0 is satisfied. In order to achieve the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius ≧2.0, in a case in which a pass in which the rolling reduction ratio is 30% or more in the temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. is defined as a large reduction pass, a waiting time t (seconds) from completion of the final pass of the large reduction pass to initiation of cooling satisfies the formula 2, and the temperature increase of the steel sheet between the respective passes is desirably 18° C. or lower.
FIGS. 26 and 27 show the relationship among the temperature increase amount of the steel sheet between the passes during rolling at T1+30° C. to T1+200° C.; the waiting time t; and rL and r60. In a case in which the temperature increase of the steel sheet between the respective passes at T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. is 18° C. or lower, and t satisfies the formula 2, it is possible to obtain uniform recrystallized austenite having an rL of 0.70 or more and an r60 of 1.10 or less.
When the waiting time t exceeds t1×2.5, grain coarsening proceeds, and elongation significantly degrades. In addition, when the waiting time t is shorter than t1, anisotropy increases, and the equiaxed grain proportion decreases.
In a case in which the temperature increase of the steel sheet at T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. is too low to obtain a predetermined rolling reduction ratio in a range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., recrystallization is suppressed. In addition, in a case in which the waiting time t (seconds) does not satisfy the formula 2, grains are coarsened by the time being too long, recrystallization does not proceed by the time being too short, and sufficient local deformability cannot be obtained.
A cooling pattern after rolling is not particularly limited. The effects of the present invention can be obtained by employing a cooling pattern for controlling the structure according to the respective objects.
During hot rolling, a sheet bar may be joined after rough rolling, and finishing rolling may be continuously carried out. At this time, a rough bar may be once rolled into a coil shape, stored in a cover having a heat-retention function as necessary, and again rolled back, whereby the rough bar is joined.
In addition, rolling may be carried out after hot rolling.
Skin pass rolling may be carried out on the hot-rolled steel sheet according to necessity. Skin pass rolling has an effect of preventing the stretcher strain which occurs during working forming or flatness correction.
The structure of the hot-rolled steel sheet obtained in the embodiment mainly includes ferrite, but may include pearlite, bainite, martensite, austenite, and compounds such as carbonitrides, as metallic structures other than ferrite. Since the crystal structure of martensite or bainite is the same as or similar to the crystal structure of ferrite, the above structures may be a main component instead of ferrite.
Further, the steel sheet according to the present invention can be applied not only to bending working but also to combined forming composed mainly of bending, overhanging, drawing, and bending working.
Next, the method of manufacturing a cold-rolled steel sheet according to the embodiment will be described. In order to realize excellent local deformability, in a steel sheet that has undergone cold rolling, it is important to form a texture having a predetermined X-ray random intensity ratio, satisfy the conditions of the r values in the respective directions, and control grain shapes. Details of the manufacturing conditions for satisfying the above will be described below.
A manufacturing method preceding hot rolling is not particularly limited. That is, subsequent to ingoting using a blast furnace, an electric furnace, or the like, a variety of secondary purifications are carried out, then, the ingot may be cast through a method, such as ordinary continuous casting, an ingot method, or thin slab casting. In the case of continuous casting, the ingot may be once cooled to a low temperature, reheated, and then hot-rolled, or a cast slab may also be hot-rolled as it is after casting without cooling the cast slab to a low temperature. Scraps may be used as a raw material.
The cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent local deformability according to the embodiment is obtained in a case in which the following conditions are satisfied.
In order for rC and r30 to satisfy the above predetermined values, the austenite grain diameter after rough rolling, that is, before finishing rolling is important. As shown in FIGS. 28 and 29, the austenite grain diameter before finishing rolling is desirably small, and the above values are satisfied when the austenite grain diameter is 200 μm or less.
In order to obtain an austenite grain diameter before finishing rolling of 200 μm or less, as shown in FIG. 21, it is necessary to carry out the rough rolling in a temperature range of 1000° C. to 1200° C. and carry out rolling once or more at a rolling reduction ratio of at least 20% or more. As the rolling reduction ratio and the number of times of rolling increase, smaller grains can be obtained.
The austenite grain diameter is more desirably set to 100 μm or less, and, in order to achieve the austenite grain diameter of 100 μm or less, it is desirable to carry out rolling twice or more at a rolling reduction ratio of 20% or more. Desirably, rolling is carried out twice or more at a rolling reduction ratio of 40% or more. As the rolling reduction ratio and the number of times of rolling increase, smaller grains can be obtained, but there is a concern that the temperature may decrease or the scales may be excessively generated when the rolling exceeds 70% or the number of times of the rough rolling exceeds 10 times. As such, a decrease in the austenite grain diameter before finishing rolling is effective to improve local deformability through acceleration of recrystallization of austenite during subsequent finishing rolling, particularly through control of rL or r30.
The reason why refinement of the austenite grain diameter has an influence on local deformability is assumed to be that austenite grain boundaries after the rough rolling, that is, austenite grain boundaries before the finishing rolling, function as one of recrystallization nuclei during the finishing rolling. In order to confirm the austenite grain diameter after the rough rolling, it is desirable to cool a sheet piece that is about to be finishing-rolled as rapidly as possible. The sheet piece is cooled at a cooling rate of 10° C./s or more, the structure on the cross section of the sheet piece is etched, austenite grain boundaries are made to appear, and the austenite grain diameter is measured using an optical microscope. At this time, the austenite grain diameter is measured at a magnification of 50 times or more at 20 sites or more through an image analysis or a point counter method.
In addition, in order to achieve an average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group in a thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the steel sheet surface, and an X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation in the above value ranges, based on the T1 temperature determined by the steel sheet components in the finishing rolling after the rough rolling, working is carried out at a large rolling reduction ratio in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., desirably in a temperature range of T1+50° C. to T1+100° C., and working is carried out at a small rolling reduction ratio in a temperature range of T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. According to the above, the local deformability and shape of a final hot-rolled product can be secured. FIGS. 30 to 31 show the relationships between the rolling reduction ratios in the temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. and the X-ray random intensity ratios of the respective orientations.
That is, large reduction in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. and subsequent light rolling at T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. as shown in FIGS. 30 and 31 control the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group in a thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the steel sheet surface, and the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation so as to drastically improve the local deformability of the final hot-rolled product as shown in Tables 7 and 8 below. The T1 temperature is experimentally obtained, and the inventors found from experiments that recrystallization in the austenite range of the respective steels is accelerated with the T1 temperature as a basis.
Furthermore, in order to obtain more favorable local deformability, it is important to accumulate strain through the large reduction, and the total rolling reduction ratio is 50% or more, more desirably 60% or more, and still more desirably 70% or more. On the other hand, a total rolling reduction ratio exceeding 90% is not desirable from the viewpoint of temperature securement or excessive rolling loads. Furthermore, in order to enhance the homogeneity of a hot-rolled sheet, and enhance the local deformability to the extreme, among the rolling passes in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., in at least one pass, rolling is carried out at a rolling reduction ratio of 30% or more, and desirably at 40% or more. Meanwhile, when the rolling reduction ratio exceeds 70% in a pass, there is a concern that the shape may be impaired. In a case in which there is a demand for more favorable workability, it is more desirable to set the rolling reduction ratio to 30% or more in the final 2 passes.
Furthermore, in order to accelerate uniform recrystallization through releasing of accumulated strain, it is necessary to suppress as much as possible the working amount in a temperature range of T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. after the large reduction at T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., and the total rolling rate at T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. is set to less than 30%. A rolling reduction ratio of 10% or more is desirable from the viewpoint of the sheet shape, but a rolling reduction ratio of 0% is desirable in a case in which local deformability matters more. When the rolling reduction ratio at T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. exceeds a predetermined range, recrystallized austenite grains are expanded, and, when the retention time is short, recrystallization does not sufficiently proceed, and the local deformability deteriorates. That is, in the manufacturing conditions according to the embodiment, it is important to uniformly and finely recrystallize austenite during finishing rolling so as to control the texture of a hot-rolled product in order to improve local deformability, such as hole expanding properties or bending properties.
When rolling is carried out at a lower temperature than the temperature range specified above or at a larger rolling reduction ratio than the specified rolling reduction ratio, the texture of austenite develops, and the X-ray random intensity ratios in the respective crystal orientations, such as the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group at least in a thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from a steel sheet surface of less than 4.0 and the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation of 5.0 or less, cannot be obtained in the finally obtained cold-rolled steel sheet.
Meanwhile, when rolling is carried out at a higher temperature than the specified temperature range or at a smaller rolling reduction ratio than the specified rolling reduction ratio, grain coarsening or duplex grains results, and the area fraction of crystal grains having a grain diameter of larger than 20 μm increases. Whether or not the above-specified rolling is carried out can be determined from the rolling reduction ratio, rolling load, sheet thickness measurement, or the like through actual performance or calculation. In addition, since the temperature can also be measured if a thermometer is present between stands, and calculation simulation in which working heat generation and the like are considered from line speed, rolling reduction ratio, and the like is available, whether or not the above-specified rolling is carried out can be determined using either or both of temperature and calculation simulation.
The hot rolling carried out in the above manner ends at a temperature of Ar3 or higher. When the end temperature of the hot rolling is lower than Ar3, since two-phase region rolling in an austenite area and a ferrite area is included, accumulation into the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group becomes strong, and, consequently, local deformability significantly degrades.
As long as rL and r60 are 0.70 or more and 1.10 or less respectively, furthermore, favorable sheet thickness/minimum bending radius is greater than or equal to 2.0 is satisfied. In order to achieve the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of greater than or equal to 2.0, the temperature increase of the steel sheet between the respective passes during rolling at T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. is desirably suppressed to 18° C. or lower, and it is desirable to employ cooling between stands, or the like.
Furthermore, cooling after rolling at the final rolling stand of rolling mill in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. has a strong influence on the grain diameter of austenite, which has a strong influence on the equiaxed grain proportion and coarse grain proportion of a cold-rolled and annealed structure. Therefore, in a case in which a pass in which a rolling reduction ratio is 30% or more in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. is defined as a large reduction pass, it is necessary for the waiting time t from completion of the final pass of the large reduction pass to initiation of cooling to satisfy the formula 4. When the time being too long, grains are coarsened and elongation significantly degrades. When the time being too short, recrystallization does not proceed and sufficient local deformability cannot be obtained. Therefore, it is not possible for the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius is greater than or equal to 2.0.
In addition, a cooling pattern after hot rolling is not particularly specified, and the effects of the present invention can be obtained by employing a cooling pattern for controlling the structure according to the respective objects.
During hot rolling, a sheet bar may be joined after rough rolling, and finishing rolling may be continuously carried out. At this time, a rough bar may be once rolled into a coil shape, stored in a cover having a heat-retention function as necessary, and again rolled back, whereby the rough bar is joined.
On the steel sheet for which the hot rolling has been completed, cold rolling is carried out at a rolling reduction ratio of 20% to 90%. At a rolling reduction ratio of less than 20%, it becomes difficult to cause recrystallization in a subsequent annealing process, and annealed crystal grains are coarsened and the equiaxed grain proportion decreases. At a rolling reduction ratio of more than 90%, since a texture develops during annealing, anisotropy becomes strong. Therefore, the rolling reduction ratio is set to 20% to 90% of cold rolling.
The cold-rolled steel sheet is, then, held in a temperature range of 720° C. to 900° C. for 1 second to 300 seconds. When the temperature is less than 720° C. or the holding time is less than 1 second, reverse transformation does not proceed sufficiently at a low temperature or for a short time, and a second phase cannot be obtained in a subsequent cooling process, and therefore a sufficient strength cannot be obtained. On the other hand, when the temperature exceeds 900° C. or the cold-rolled steel sheet is held for 300 seconds or more, crystal grains coarsen, and therefore the area fraction of crystal grains having a grain diameter of 20 μm or less increases. After that, the temperature is decreased to 500° C. or less at a cooling rate of 10° C./s to 200° C./s from 650° C. to 500° C. When the cooling rate is less than 10° C./s or the cooling ends at higher than 500° C., pearlite is generated, and therefore local deformability degrades. On the other hand, even when the cooling rate is set to more than 200° C./s, the effect of suppressing pearlite is saturated, and, conversely, the controllability of the cooling end temperature significantly deteriorates, and therefore the cooling rate is set to 200° C./s or less.
The structure of the cold-rolled steel sheet obtained in the embodiment includes ferrite, but may include pearlite, bainite, martensite, austenite, and compounds such as carbonitrides, as metallic structures other than ferrite. However, since pearlite deteriorates local deformability, the content of pearlite is desirably 5% or less. Since the crystal structure of martensite or bainite is the same as or similar to the crystal structure of ferrite, the structure may mainly include any of ferrite, bainite, and martensite.
Further, the cold-rolled steel sheet according to the present invention can be applied not only to bending working but also to combined forming composed mainly of bending, overhanging, drawing, and bending working.
Next, the method of manufacturing a galvanized steel sheet according to the embodiment will be described.
In order to realize excellent local deformability, in a steel sheet that has undergone a galvanizing treatment, it is important to form a texture having a predetermined X-ray random intensity ratio, satisfy the conditions of the r values in the respective directions. Details of the manufacturing conditions for satisfying the above will be described below.
A manufacturing method preceding hot rolling is not particularly limited. That is, subsequent to ingoting using a blast furnace, an electric furnace, or the like, a variety of secondary purifications are carried out, then, the ingot may be cast through a method, such as ordinary continuous casting, an ingot method, or thin slab casting. In the case of continuous casting, the ingot may be once cooled to a low temperature, reheated, and then hot-rolled, or a cast slab may also be hot-rolled as it is after casting without cooling the cast slab to a low temperature. Scraps may be used as a raw material.
The galvanized steel sheet having excellent local deformability according to the embodiment is obtained in a case in which the following conditions are satisfied.
Firstly, in order for rC and r30 to satisfy the above predetermined values, the austenite grain diameter after rough rolling, that is, before finishing rolling is important. As shown in FIGS. 32 and 33, the austenite grain diameter before finishing rolling is desirably small, and the above values are satisfied when the austenite grain diameter is 200 μm or less.
In order to obtain an austenite grain diameter before finishing rolling of 200 μm or less, as shown in FIG. 21, it is necessary to carry out the rough rolling in a temperature range of 1000° C. to 1200° C. and carry out rolling once or more at a rolling reduction ratio of at least 20% or more. However, in order to further enhance homogeneity and enhance elongation and local deformability, it is desirable to carry out rolling once or more at a rolling reduction ratio of at least 40% in terms of a rough rolling reduction ratio in a temperature range of 1000° C. to 1200° C.
In order to obtain austenite grains of 100 μm or less which are more preferable, one or more times of rolling, a total of two or more times of rolling at a rolling reduction ratio of 20% or more is further carried out. Desirably, rolling is carried out twice or more at 40% or more. As the rolling reduction ratio and the number of times of rolling increase, smaller grains can be obtained, but there is a concern that the temperature may decrease or scales may be excessively generated when the rolling exceeds 70% or the number of times of the rough rolling exceeds 10 times. As such, a decrease in the austenite grain diameter before finishing rolling is effective to improve local deformability through acceleration of recrystallization of austenite during subsequent finishing rolling, particularly through control of rL or r30.
The reason why refinement of the austenite grain diameter has an influence on local deformability is assumed to be that austenite grain boundaries after the rough rolling, that is, austenite grain boundaries before the finishing rolling function as one of recrystallization nuclei during the finishing rolling.
In order to confirm the austenite grain diameter after the rough rolling, it is desirable to cool a sheet piece that is about to be finishing-rolled as rapidly as possible. The sheet piece is cooled at a cooling rate of 10° C./s or more, the structure on the cross section of the sheet piece is etched, austenite grain boundaries are made to appear, and the austenite grain diameter is measured using an optical microscope. At this time, the austenite grain diameter is measured at a magnification of 50 times or more at 20 sites or more through an image analysis or a point counter method. Furthermore, the austenite grain diameter is desirably 100 μm or less in order to enhance local deformability.
In addition, in order to achieve an average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group in a thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the steel sheet surface and an X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation in the above value ranges, based on the T1 temperature determined by the steel sheet components specified in the formula 1 in the finishing rolling after the rough rolling, working is carried out at a large rolling reduction ratio in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., desirably in a temperature range of T1+50° C. to T1+100° C., and working is carried out at a small rolling reduction ratio in a temperature range of T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. According to the above, the local deformability and shape of a final hot-rolled product can be secured.
FIGS. 34 to 37 show the relationships between the rolling reduction ratios in the respective temperature ranges and the X-ray random intensity ratios of the respective orientations.
That is, large reduction at a total rolling reduction ratio of 50% or more in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. as shown in FIGS. 34 and 36 and subsequent light rolling at a total rolling reduction ratio of less than 30% or more at T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. as shown in FIGS. 35 and 37 control the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {100}<011> to {223} <110> orientation group in a thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from the steel sheet surface, and the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation so as to drastically improve the local deformability of the final hot-rolled product. The T1 temperature is experimentally obtained, and the inventors and the like found from experiments that recrystallization in the austenite range of the respective steels is accelerated with the T1 temperature as a basis.
Furthermore, in order to obtain more favorable local deformability, it is important to accumulate strain through the large reduction or repeatedly recrystallize the structure every rolling. For strain accumulation, the total rolling reduction ratio needs to be 50% or more, more desirably 60% or more, and still more desirably 70% or more, and the temperature increase of the steel sheet between passes is desirably 18° C. or lower. On the other hand, achieving a rolling reduction ratio of more than 90% is not desirable from the viewpoint of temperature securement or excessive rolling load. Furthermore, in order to enhance the homogeneity of a hot-rolled sheet, and enhance the local deformability to the extreme, among the rolling passes in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., in at least one pass, rolling is carried out at a rolling reduction ratio of 30% or more, and desirably at 40% or more. Meanwhile, when the rolling reduction ratio exceeds 70% in a pass, there is a concern that the shape may be impaired. In a case in which there is a demand for more favorable workability, it is more desirable to set the rolling reduction ratio to 30% or more in the final 2 passes.
Furthermore, in order to accelerate uniform recrystallization through releasing of accumulated strain, it is necessary to suppress as much as possible the working amount in a temperature range of 11° C. to lower than T1+30° C. after the large reduction at T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., and the total rolling rate at T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. is set to less than 30%. A rolling reduction ratio of 10% or more is desirable from the viewpoint of the sheet shape, but a rolling reduction ratio of 0% is desirable in a case in which local deformability is focused. When the rolling reduction ratio at T1° C. to lower than T1+30° C. exceeds a predetermined range, recrystallized austenite grains are expanded, and, when the retention time is short, recrystallization does not sufficiently proceed, and the local deformability deteriorates. That is, in the manufacturing conditions according to the embodiment, it is important to uniformly and finely recrystallize austenite during finishing rolling so as to control the texture of a hot-rolled product in order to improve local deformability, such as hole expanding properties or bending properties.
When rolling is carried out at a lower temperature than the temperature range specified above or at a larger rolling reduction ratio than the specified rolling reduction ratio, the texture of austenite develops, and the X-ray random intensity ratios in the respective crystal orientations, such as the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group at least in a thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from a steel sheet surface of less than 4.0, and the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation of 5.0 or less, cannot be obtained in the finally obtained galvanized steel sheet. Meanwhile, when rolling is carried out at a higher temperature than the specified temperature range or at a smaller rolling reduction ratio than the specified rolling reduction ratio, grain coarsening or duplex grains results, and, consequently, local deformability significantly degrades. Whether or not the above-specified rolling is carried out can be determined from rolling reduction ratio, rolling load, sheet thickness measurement, or the like through actual performance or calculation. In addition, since the temperature can be also measured if a thermometer is present between stands, and calculation simulation in which working heat generation and the like are considered from line speed, rolling reduction ratio, and the like is available, whether or not the above-specified rolling is carried out can be determined using either or both of temperature and calculation simulation.
The hot rolling carried out in the above manner ends at a temperature of Ar3 or higher. When the end temperature of the hot rolling is lower than Ar3, since two-phase region rolling in an austenite area and a ferrite area is included, accumulation into the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group becomes strong, and, consequently, local deformability significantly degrades.
Furthermore, as long as rL and r60 are 0.70 or more and 1.10 or less respectively, furthermore, the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius is greater than or equal to 2.0. In order to achieve the sheet thickness/minimum bending radius of greater than or equal to 2.0, in a case in which a pass in which a rolling reduction ratio is 30% or more in a temperature range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. is defined as a large reduction pass, it is important for the waiting time t (seconds) from completion of the final pass of the large reduction pass to initiation of cooling to satisfy the formula 6.
FIGS. 38 and 39 show the relationship among the temperature increase of the steel sheet during rolling at T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., the waiting time t, rL, and r60.
The waiting time t satisfying the formula 6 and, furthermore, suppression of the temperature increase of the steel sheet at T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. to 18° C. or lower in the respective passes are effective to obtain uniformly recrystallized austenite.
Further, in a case in which the temperature increase at T1+30° C. to T1+200° C. is too low such that a predetermined rolling reduction ratio cannot be obtained in a range of T1+30° C. to T1+200° C., recrystallization is suppressed, and, in a case in which the waiting time t does not satisfy the formula 6, by the time being too long, grains are coarsened and, by the time being too short, recrystallization does not proceed and sufficient local deformability cannot be obtained.
A cooling pattern after hot rolling is not particularly specified, and the effects of the present invention can be obtained by employing a cooling pattern for controlling the structure according to the respective objects. However, when the winding temperature exceeds 680° C., since there is a concern that surface oxidation may proceed or bending properties after cold rolling or annealing may be adversely influenced, the winding temperature is set to a temperature from room temperature to 680° C.
During hot rolling, a sheet bar may be joined after rough rolling, and finishing rolling may be continuously carried out. At this time, a rough bar may be once rolled into a coil shape, stored in a cover having a heat-retention function as necessary, and again rolled back, whereby the rough bar is joined. Skin pass rolling may be carried out on the hot-rolled steel sheet as necessary. Skin pass rolling has an effect of preventing stretched strain occurring during working forming or flatness correction.
In addition, the steel sheet for which the hot rolling has been completed is subjected to pickling, and then cold rolling at a rolling reduction ratio of 20% to 90%. When the rolling reduction ratio is less than 20%, there is a concern that sufficient cold-rolled recrystallized structures may not be formed, and mixed grains may be formed. In addition, when the rolling reduction ratio exceeds 90%, there is a concern of rupture due to cracking. The effects of the present invention can be obtained even when a heat treatment pattern for controlling the structure in accordance with purposes is employed as the heat treatment pattern of annealing.
However, in order to obtain a sufficient cold-rolled recrystallized equiaxed structure and satisfy conditions in the ranges of the present application, it is necessary to heat the steel sheet to a temperature range of at least 650° C. to 900° C., anneal the steel sheet for a holding time of 1 second to 300 seconds, and then carry out primary cooling to a temperature range of 720° C. to 580° C. at a cooling rate of 0.1° C./s to 100° C./s. When the holding temperature is lower than 650° C., or the holding time is less than 1 second, a sufficient recovered recrystallized structure cannot be obtained. In addition, when the holding temperature exceeds 900° C., or the holding time exceeds 300 seconds, there is a concern of oxidation or coarsening of grains. In addition, when the cooling rate is less than 0.1° C./s, or the temperature range exceeds 720° C. in the temporary cooling, there is a concern that a sufficient amount of transformation may not be obtained. In addition, in a case in which the cooling rate exceeds 100° C./s, or the temperature range is lower than 580° C., there is a concern of coarsening of grains and the like.
After that, according to an ordinary method, a galvanizing treatment is carried out so as to obtain a galvanized steel sheet.
The structure of the galvanized steel sheet obtained in the embodiment mainly includes ferrite, but may include pearlite, bainite, martensite, austenite, and compounds such as carbonitrides, as metallic structures other than ferrite. Since the crystal structure of martensite or bainite is the same as or similar to the crystal structure of ferrite, the structure may mainly include any of ferrite, bainite, and martensite.
The galvanized steel sheet according to the present invention can be applied not only to bending working but also to combined forming composed mainly of bending, overhanging, drawing, and bending working.
EXAMPLE 1
The technical content of the hot-rolled steel sheet according to the embodiment will be described using examples of the present invention.
The results of studies in which steels of AA to Bg having the component compositions shown in Table 1 were used as examples will be described.
[Table 1]
The steels were cast, reheated as they were or after being cooled to room temperature, heated to a temperature range of 900° C. to 1300° C., and then hot-rolled under the conditions of Table 2 or 3, thereby, finally, obtaining 2.3 mm or 3.2 mm-thick hot-rolled steel sheets.
[Table 2]
[Table 3]
Table 1 shows the chemical components of the respective steels, Tables 2 and 3 show the respective manufacturing conditions, and Tables 4 and 5 show structures and mechanical characteristics.
As an index of local deformability, the hole expanding rate and the limit bending radius through 90° V-shape bending were used. In bending tests, C-direction bending and 45°-direction bending were carried out, and the rates were used as the index of the orientation dependency of formability. Tensile tests and the bending tests were based on JIS Z2241 and the V block 90° bending tests of JIS Z2248, and hole expanding tests were based on the Japan Iron and Steel Federation standard JFS T1001, respectively. The X-ray random intensity ratio was measured using the EBSD at a 0.5 μm pitch with respect to a 1⁄4 location from the end portion in the width direction in a sheet thickness central portion in a 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 area of a cross section parallel to the rolling direction. In addition, the r values in the respective directions were measured through the above methods.
[Table 4]
[Table 5]
EXAMPLE 2
The technical content of the cold-rolled steel sheet according to the embodiment will be described using examples of the present invention.
The results of studies in which steels of CA to CW having the component compositions shown in Table 6 which satisfied the components specified in the claims of the present invention and comparative steels of Ca to Cg were used as examples will be described.
[Table 6]
The steels were cast, reheated as they were or after being cooled to room temperature, heated to a temperature range of 900° C. to 1300° C., then, hot-rolled under the conditions of Table 7, thereby obtaining 2 mm to 5 mm-thick hot-rolled steel sheets. The steel sheets were pickled, cold-rolled into a thickness of 1.2 mm to 2.3 mm, and annealed under the annealing conditions shown in Table 7. After that, 0.5% scan pass rolling was carried out, and the steel sheets were provided for material quality evaluation.
[Table 7]
Table 6 shows the chemical components of the respective steels, and Table 7 shows the respective manufacturing conditions. In addition, Table 8 shows the structures and mechanical characteristics of the steel sheets. As an index of local deformability, the hole expanding rate and the limit bending radius through V-shape bending were used. In bending tests, C-direction bending and 45°-direction bending were carried out, and the rates were used as the index of the orientation dependency of formability. Tensile tests and the bending tests were based on JIS Z2241 and the V block 90° bending tests of JIS Z2248, and hole expanding tests were based on the Japan Iron and Steel Federation standard JFS T1001, respectively. The X-ray random intensity ratio was measured using the EBSD at a 0.5 μm pitch with respect to a 1⁄4 location from the end portion in the width direction in a sheet thickness central portion in a 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 area of a cross section parallel to the rolling direction. In addition, the r values in the respective directions were measured through the above methods.
[Table 8]
EXAMPLE 3
The technical content of the galvanized steel sheet according to the embodiment will be described using examples of the present invention.
The results of studies in which steels of DA to DL having the component compositions shown in Table 9 were used as examples will be described.
[Table 9]
The steels were cast, reheated as they were or after being cooled to room temperature, heated to a temperature range of 900° C. to 1300° C., then, cold-rolled under the conditions of Table 10, thereby obtaining 2 mm to 5 mm-thick hot-rolled steel sheets. The steel sheets were pickled, cold-rolled into a thickness of 1.2 mm to 2.3 mm, annealed under the annealing conditions shown in Table 10, and continuously subjected to annealing and a galvanized coating or galvanealed coating treatment using a galvanized coating bath. After that, 0.5% scan pass rolling was carried out, and the steel sheets were provided for material quality evaluation.
[Table 10]
Table 9 shows the chemical components of the respective steels, Table 10 shows the respective manufacturing conditions, and Table 11 shows the structures and mechanical characteristics of the steel sheets under the respective manufacturing conditions.
As an index of local deformability, the hole expanding rate and the limit bending radius through 90° V-shape bending were used. Tensile tests and the bending tests were based on JIS Z2241 and the V block 90° bending tests of JIS Z 2248, and hole expanding tests were based on the Japan Iron and Steel Federation standard JFS T1001, respectively. The X-ray random intensity ratio was measured using the EBSD at a 0.5 μm pitch with respect to a 1⁄4 location from the end portion in the width direction in a sheet thickness central portion in a 3⁄8 to 5⁄8 area of a cross section parallel to the rolling direction. In addition, the r values in the respective directions were measured through the above methods.
[Table 11]
As shown in, for example, FIGS. 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, and 45, steel sheets satisfying the specifications of the present invention had excellent hole expanding properties, bending properties, and small forming anisotropy. Furthermore, steel sheets manufactured in the desirable condition ranges exhibited superior hole expanding rate and bending properties.
Industrial Applicability
As described above, according to the present invention, without limiting the main structure configuration, it is possible to obtain a hot-rolled steel sheet, a cold-rolled steel sheet, and a galvanized steel sheet which are excellent in terms of local deforambility and have a small orientation influence of formability even when Nb, Ti and the like are added by controlling the texture in addition to controlling the sizes and shapes of crystal grains.
Therefore, the present invention is highly useful in the steel-manufacturing industry.
In addition, in the present invention, the strength of the steel sheet is not specified; however, since formability degrades as the strength increases as described above, the effects are particularly large in the case of a high-strength steel sheet, for example, a case in which the tensile strength is 440 M Pa or more.







TABLE 1





Chemical components (mass %)







(1/4)



















T1/° C.
C
Si
Mn
P
S
Al
N
O
Ti
Nb





AA
851
0.070
0.08
1.30
0.015
0.004
0.040
0.0026
0.0032
—
—


AB
865
0.080
0.31
1.35
0.012
0.005
0.016
0.0032
0.0023
—
 0.041


AC
858
0.060
0.87
1.20
0.009
0.004
0.038
0.0033
0.0026
—
 0.021


AD
865
0.210
0.15
1.62
0.012
0.003
0.026
0.0033
0.0021
 0.021
—


AE
861
0.035
0.67
1.88
0.015
0.003
0.045
0.0028
0.0029
—
 0.021


AF
875
0.180
0.48
2.72
0.009
0.003
0.050
0.0036
0.0022
—
—


AG
892
0.060
0.11
2.12
0.010
0.005
0.033
0.0028
0.0035
 0.036
 0.089


AH
903
0.040
0.13
1.33
0.010
0.005
0.038
0.0032
0.0026
 0.042
 0.121


AI
855
0.350
0.52
1.33
0.260
0.003
0.045
0.0026
0.0019
—
—


AJ
1376
0.072
0.15
1.42
0.014
0.004
0.036
0.0022
0.0025
—
1.5 


AK
851
0.110
0.23
1.12
0.021
0.003
0.026
0.0025
0.0023
—
—


AL
1154
0.250
0.23
1.56
0.024
0.120
0.034
0.0022
0.0023
—
—


BA
864
0.078
0.82
2.05
0.012
0.004
0.032
0.0026
0.0032
0.02
0.02


BB
852
0.085
0.75
2.25
0.012
0.003
0.035
0.0032
0.0023
—
—


BC
866
0.110
0.10
1.55
0.02 
0.004
0.038
0.0033
0.0026
—
0.04


BD
863
0.350
1.80
2.33
0.012
0.003
0.710
0.0033
0.0021
0.02


BE
859
0.120
0.22
1.35
0.015
0.003
0.025
0.0055
0.0029
—
0.02


BF
884
0.068
0.50
3.20
0.122
0.002
0.040
0.0032
0.0038
0.03
0.07


BG
858
0.130
0.24
1.54
0.010
0.001
0.038
0.0025
0.0029
—
0.02


BH
899
0.035
0.05
2.20
0.010
0.020
0.021
0.0019
0.0023
0.15
0.03


BI
852
0.090
1.25
1.88
0.014
0.002
0.030
0.0030
0.0030
—
—


BJ
852
0.115
1.10
1.46
0.008
0.002
0.850
0.0034
0.0031
—
—


BK
861
0.144
0.45
2.52
0.007
0.001
0.021
0.0024
0.0031
0.03
—










(2/4)



















B
Mg
Rem
Ca
Mo
Cr
W
As
V
Others
Note





AA
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


AB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


AC
—
—
0.0015
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


AD
0.0022
—
—
—
0.03
0.35
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


AE
—
0.002
—
0.0015
—
—
—
—
 0.029
—
Invention













steel


AF
—
0.002
—
—
0.10
—
—
—
0.10
—
Invention













steel


AG
0.0012
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


AH
0.0009
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


AI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Comparative













steel


AJ
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Comparative













steel


AK
—
0.150
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Comparative













steel


AL
—
—
—
—
—
5.0 
—
—
2.50
—
Comparative













steel


BA
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


BB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Co: 0.5%
Invention












Sn: 0.02%
steel


BC
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


BD
0.0020
—
0.0035
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


BE
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


BF
—
—
0.0044
—
—
0.10
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


BG
—
—
—
—
—

—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


BH
—
—
0.0005
0.0009


0.05

—
—
Invention













steel


BI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


BJ
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


BK
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Cu: 0.5%,
Invention












Ni: 0.25%,
steel












Zr: 0.02%










(3/4)



















T1/° C.
C
Si
Mn
P
S
Al
N
O
Ti
Nb





BL
853
0.190
1.40
1.78
0.011
0.002
0.018
0.0032
0.0028
—
—


BM
866
0.080
0.10
1.40
0.007
0.002
1.700
0.0033
0.0034
—
—


BN
852
0.062
0.72
2.82
0.009
0.002
0.035
0.0033
0.0022
—
—


BO
885
0.120
0.80
2.20
0.008
0.002
0.035
0.0022
0.0035
0.05
—


BP
873
0.190
0.55
2.77
0.009
0.002
0.032
0.0033
0.0036
0.04
—


BQ
852
0.082
0.77
1.82
0.008
0.003
0.025
0.0032
0.0031
—
—


BR
875
0.030
1.00
2.40
0.005
0.001
0.033
0.0022
0.0011
0.05
0.01


BS
852
0.077
0.45
2.05
0.009
0.003
0.025
0.0029
0.0031
—
—


BT
861
0.142
0.70
2.44
0.008
0.002
0.030
0.0032
0.0035
0.03
—


BU
876
0.009
0.10
1.40
0.006
0.001
0.003
0.0033
0.0024
0.10
—


BV
853
0.150
0.61
2.20
0.011
0.002
0.028
0.0021
0.0036
—
—


BW
1043
0.120
0.17
2.26
0.028
0.009
0.033
0.0027
0.0019
—
—


Ba
860
0.440
0.50
2.20
0.008
0.002
0.035
0.0021
0.0012
—
—


Bb
854
0.080
0.45
4.50
0.200
0.002
0.034
0.0041
0.0015
—
—


Bc
914
0.080
0.35
2.00
0.008
0.002
0.033
0.0042
0.0034
0.25
—


Bd
939
0.070
0.35
2.40
0.008
0.002
0.035
0.0035
0.0026
—
0.25


Be
851
0.090
0.10
1.00
0.008
0.040
0.036
0.0035
0.0022
—
—


Bf
952
0.070
0.21
2.20
0.008
0.002
0.033
0.0023
0.0036
—
—


Bg
853
0.140
0.11
1.90
0.008
0.002
0.032
0.0044
0.0035
—
—










(4/4)



















B
Mg
Rem
Ca
Mo
Cr
W
As
V
Others
Note





BL
0.0002
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


BM
—
—
—
0.0022
—
—
—
—
0.15
—
Invention













steel


BN
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


BO
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.01
0.20
—
Invention













steel


BP
—
0.006
—
—
 0.022
—
—
—
0.05
—
Invention













steel


BQ
0.0002
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


BR
—
0.004
0.004
—
—
0.80
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


BS
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


BT
0.0002
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


BU
—
—
—
—
0.01
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


BV
—
0.004
0.005
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


BW
—
—
—
—
0.90
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


Ba
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Comparative













steel


Bb
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Comparative













steel


Bc
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Comparative













steel


Bd
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Comparative













steel


Be
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Comparative













steel


Bf
—
0.020
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.10
—
Comparative













steel


Bg
—
—
0.15 
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Comparative













steel
















TABLE 2





Manufacturing conditions







(1/2)













Number of times
Rolling reduction


Temperature



of rolling of
rate of 20%
Austenite
Total rolling
increase during



20% or more at
or more at
grain
reduction rate at
rolling at



1000° C. to
1000° C. to
diameter/
T1 + 30° C. to
T1 + 30° C. to













Steel type
T1/° C.
1200° C.
1200° C./%
μm
T1 + 200° C./%
T1 + 200° C./° C.

















1
AA
851
1
20
150 
85
15


2
AA
851
2
45/45
90
95
 5


3
AB
865
2
45/45
80
75
15


4
AB
865
2
45/45
80
85
18


5
AC
858
2
45/45
95
85
13


6
AC
858
2
45/45
95
95
14


7
AD
862
3
40/40/40
75
80
16


8
AE
858
2
45/40
95
80
17


9
AE
858
1
50
120 
80
18


10
AF
875
3
40/40/40
70
95
18


11
AG
892
3
40/40/40
65
95
10


12
AH
903
2
45/45
70
90
13


13
AH
903
2
45/45
95
85
15


14
AF
875
3
40/40/40
70
65
20


15
AG
892
1
50
120 
75
20


16
AG
892
1
50
120 
60
21


17
AH
903
1
50
120 
65
19


18
AH
903
1
50
120 
35
12


19
AA
851
2
45/45
90
45
20


20
AB
865
2
45/45
80
45
15


21
AV
858
2
40/45
95
75
12


22
AG
892
0
—
350 
45
30


23
AE
858
1
50
120 
80
40


24
AA
851
0
—
250 
65
18


25
AC
858
0
—
300 
85
13










26
AI
855
Cracked during hot rolling


27
AJ
1376
Cracked during hot rolling


28
AK
851
Cracked during hot rolling


29
AL
1154
Cracked during hot rolling










(2/2)
















Total rolling
Tf:



t: Waiting time





reduction
Temperature
P1: Rolling


from completion



rate at
after final
reduction rate


of heavy rolling



T1° C. to
pass of
of final pass


pass to


Steel
lower than
heavy rolling
of heavy


initiation

Winding


type
T1 + 30° C./%
pass/° C.
rolling pass/%
t1
2.5 × t1
of cooling/s
t/t1
temperature/° C.





1
10
935
40
0.57
1.41
0.8
1.41
600


2
 0
892
35
1.74
4.35
2  
1.15
50


3
25
945
37
0.76
1.90
1  
1.32
600


4
 5
920
31
1.54
3.86
2.3
1.49
50


5
15
955
31
0.73
1.82
1  
1.38
600


6
 0
934
40
0.71
1.78
1  
1.41
500


7
25
970
30
0.62
1.56
0.9
1.45
600


8
 5
960
30
0.70
1.75
1  
1.42
300


9
15
921
30
1.40
3.50
2  
1.43
200


10
 0
990
30
0.53
1.32
0.7
1.32
500


11
 0
943
35
1.46
3.65
2.1
1.44
600


12
 0
1012
40
0.25
0.63
0.3
1.19
500


13
10
985
40
0.61
1.52
0.9
1.48
600


14
25
965
34
0.70
1.75
0.9
1.28
500


15
15
993
30
0.71
1.77
0.8
1.13
500


16
20
945
45
1.06
2.64
1.1
1.04
600


17
15
967
38
1.05
2.63
1.5
1.43
500


18
45
880
30
3.92
9.79
5  
1.28
100


19
45
930
30
1.08
2.69
5  
4.64
600


20
45
1075
30
0.20
0.50
0.1
0.50
600


21
45
890
30
2.15
5.36
1.3
0.61
600


22
35
910
35
2.44
6.09
0.5
0.21
400


23
35
860
40
3.02
7.54
9  
2.98
600


24
20
850
30
3.13
7.83
0.3
0.10
800


25
25
890
30
2.15
5.36
2.2
1.03
600








26
Cracked during hot rolling


27
Cracked during hot rolling


28
Cracked during hot rolling


29
Cracked during hot rolling
















TABLE 3





Manufacturing conditions







(1/2)













Number of times
Rolling reduction


Temperature



of rolling of
rate of 20%
Austenite
Total rolling
increase during



20% or more at
or more at
grain
reduction rate at
rolling at



1000° C. to
1000° C. to
diameter/
T1 + 30° C. to
T1 + 30° C. to













Steel type
T1/° C.
1200° C.
1200° C./%
μm
T1 + 200° C./%
T1 + 200° C./° C.

















BA1
BA
864
2
45/45
80
85
17


BB1
BB
852
2
45/45
85
80
13


BB2
BB
852
2
45/45
80
85
16


BC1
BC
866
2
45/45
80
85
16


BD1
BD
863
1
50
120
85
14


BE2
BE
859
2
45/45
80
80
16


BF1
BF
884
2
45/45
75
85
15


BF2
BF
884
1
50
110
80
13


BG1
BG
858
3
40/40/40
80
80
15


BH1
BH
899
2
45/45
80
80
12


BI1
BI
852
2
45/45
75
90
12


BI2
BI
852
2
45/45
75
80
16


BJ1
BJ
852
3
40/40/40
85
85
15


BJ2
BJ
852
2
45/45
75
80
13


BK1
BK
861
3
40/40/40
85
90
13


BK2
BK
853
3
40/40/40
85
90
12


BL1
BL
853
2
45/45
80
85
14


BL2
BL
853
2
45/45
80
80
17


BM1
BM
866
1
30
140
65
12


BN1
BN
852
2
45/45
75
70
12


BO1
BO
885
2
45/45
80
60
15


BP1
BP
873
2
45/45
75
85
13


BQ1
BQ
852
2
45/45
80
80
16


BR1
BR
875
2
45/45
75
85
12


BS1
BS
852
2
45/45
80
85
12


BS2
BS
852
2
45/45
75
80
15


BT1
BT
861
2
45/45
80
95
16


BT2
BT
861
2
45/45
85
80
12


BU1
BU
876
2
45/45
75
85
12


BV1
BV
853
2
45/45
85
80
11


BW1
BW
1043
1
50
120
80
16


Ba1
Ba
860
2
45/45
75
90
16


Bb1
Bb
854
1
50
120
85
12


Bc1
Bc
914
2
45/45
75
90
13


Bd1
Bd
939
2
45/45
75
85
12


Be1
Be
851
2
45/45
80
65
11


Bf1
Bf
952
2
45/45
80
70
12


Bg1
Bg
853
2
45/45
75
60
12










(2/2)
















Total rolling
Tf:



t: Waiting time





reduction
Temperature
P1: Rolling


from completion



rate at
after final
reduction rate


of heavy rolling



T1° C. to
pass of heavy
of final pass


pass to


Steel
lower than
rolling
of heavy


initiation

Winding


type
T1 + 30° C./%
pass/° C.
rolling pass/%
t1
2.5 × t1
of cooling/s
t/t1
temperature/° C.





BA1
0
984
45
0.13
0.33
0.28
2.15
500


BB1
0
982
40
0.14
0.34
0.29
2.10
500


BB2
0
922
45
0.66
1.65
1.15
1.75
500


BC1
0
966
45
0.22
0.55
0.37
1.68
600


BD1
0
963
40
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
600


BE2
0
929
45
0.66
1.65
1.15
1.75
600


BF1
15
944
45
0.89
2.22
1.04
1.17
500


BF2
0
954
40
0.83
2.08
6.00
7.21
500


BG2
0
958
45
0.22
0.55
0.37
1.68
600


BH1
20
959
40
1.06
2.65
1.21
1.14
500


BI1
0
952
40
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
600


BI2
0
922
45
0.66
1.65
1.15
1.75
600


BJ1
0
962
45
0.15
0.39
0.30
1.97
600


BJ2
0
922
40
0.83
2.08
1.46
1.75
600


BK1
0
961
40
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
550


BK2
0
923
40
0.83
2.08
0.98
1.18
600


BL1
0
953
45
0.22
0.55
0.37
1.68
600


BL2
0
923
50
0.51
1.28
0.66
1.29
600


BM1
10
966
40
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
500


BN1
0
952
40
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
550


BO1
0
985
45
0.22
0.55
0.37
1.68
600


BP1
0
973
40
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
600


BQ1
0
952
45
0.22
0.55
0.37
1.68
600


BR1
0
985
40
0.24
0.60
0.39
1.63
500


BS1
0
992
40
0.13
0.33
0.28
2.14
550


BS2
0
922
45
0.66
1.65
0.81
1.23
550


BT1
15
961
45
0.22
0.55
0.37
1.68
500


BT2
0
931
40
0.83
2.08
0.98
1.18
500


BU1
10
976
40
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
500


BV1
0
953
40
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
600


BW1
10
1083
45
1.46
3.66
1.61
1.10
550


Ba1
0
960
45
0.22
0.55
0.37
1.68
600


Bb1
0
954
40
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
600


Bc1
0
994
40
0.64
1.59
0.79
1.24
600


Bd1
0
999
40
1.06
2.65
1.21
1.14
600


Be1
0
951
40
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
600


Bf1
0
1012
40
1.06
2.65
1.21
1.14
600


Bg1
0
953
40
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
600
















TABLE 4





The structure and mechanical characteristics of the respective


steels in the respective manufacturing conditions







(1/2)















X-ray random









intensity ratio of





coarsened



{100} <011> to
X-ray random




grain



{223} <110>
intensity ratio




area


Steel type
orientation group
of {332} <113>
rL
rC
r30
r60
ratio/%





1
2.6
2.2
0.88
0.87
1.04
1.05
5


2
2.2
2.1
0.92
0.90
0.96
0.98
1


3
2.9
2.8
0.87
0.79
1.05
1.05
5


4
2.7
2.7
0.90
0.85
1.02
1.03
4


5
3.5
3.2
0.78
0.75
0.98
1.00
6


6
3.0
2.8
0.83
0.85
0.95
0.98
4


7
5.2
4.1
0.70
0.70
1.08
1.09
7


8
2.9
2.7
0.85
0.90
1.06
1.05
5


9
3.5
2.9
0.75
0.95
1.02
1.10
5


10
3.0
3.0
0.72
0.75
1.05
1.08
6


11
2.9
3.0
0.72
0.74
1.07
1.09
6


12
2.9
2.6
0.71
0.72
1.06
1.08
3


13
3.0
2.9
0.73
0.72
1.10
1.08
5


14
5.4
4.6
0.66
0.73
1.10
1.20
5


15
3.7
3.5
0.65
0.75
1.05
1.19
4


16
5.4
4.5
0.58
0.70
1.10
1.26
1


17
5.4
3.0
0.64
0.75
1.02
1.15
5


18
7.2
6.4
0.54
0.67
1.24
1.31
3


19
6.6
5.1
0.69
0.79
1.15
1.15
29 


20
6.9
5.2
0.56
0.65
1.25
1.19
1


21
7.2
5.8
0.65
0.68
1.18
1.15
1


22
7.6
5.4
0.52
0.65
1.22
1.30
1


23
7.1
6.4
0.63
0.65
1.15
1.23
16 


24
5.4
5.6
0.59
0.75
1.05
1.21
1


25
5.2
5.4
0.68
0.72
1.15
1.10
4








26
Cracked during hot rolling


27
Cracked during hot rolling


28
Cracked during hot rolling


29
Cracked during hot rolling










(2/2)






















45°-direction









Sheet
bending/



equiaxed



Ts × λ/
thickness/minimum
C-direction


Steel type
grain rate/%
TS/MPa
El./%
λ/%
MPa-%
bending radius
bending ratio
Note





1
74
445
34
145
64525
3.2
1.1
Invention










steel


2
80
450
38
180
81000
3.3
1.0
Invention










steel


3
72
605
25
95
57475
3.2
1.2
Invention










steel


4
73
595
24
115
68425
2.3
1.1
Invention










steel


5
75
595
29
85
50575
2.7
1.2
Invention










steel


6
78
600
28
90
54000
2.3
1.1
Invention










steel


7
72
650
19
75
48750
2.1
1.5
Invention










steel


8
72
625
21
135
84375
3.3
1.1
Invention










steel


9
72
635
19
118
74930
3.2
1.2
Invention










steel


10
78
735
15
75
55125
2.5
1.4
Invention










steel


11
77
810
19
85
68850
2.3
1.4
Invention










steel


12
78
790
21
140
110600
2.7
1.4
Invention










steel


13
74
795
20
140
111300
2.3
1.4
Invention










steel


14
69
765
14
60
45900
1.5
1.6
Invention










steel


15
74
825
18
70
57750
1.6
1.5
Invention










steel


16
70
835
17
65
54275
1.5
1.8
Invention










steel


17
67
830
17
125
103750
1.5
1.5
Invention










steel


18
59
805
19
60
48300
1.1
2.0
Invention










steel


19
29
465
34
85
39525
1.2
1.5
Comparative










steel


20
70
635
24
65
41275
1.2
1.9
Comparative










steel


21
79
640
26
45
28800
1.2
1.7
Comparative










steel


22
73
845
16
45
38025
1.1
2.0
Comparative










steel


23
57
670
16
75
50250
1.2
1.8
Comparative










steel


24
81
405
30
70
28350
1.1
1.6
Comparative










steel


25
78
650
27
50
32500
1.1
1.5
Comparative










steel









26
Cracked during hot rolling
Comparative




steel


27
Cracked during hot rolling
Comparative




steel


28
Cracked during hot rolling
Comparative




Steel


29
Cracked during hot rolling
Comparative




steel
















TABLE 5





The structure and mechanical characteristics of the respective


steels in the respective manufacturing conditions







(1/4)















X-ray random









intensity ratio of





coarsened



{100} <011> to
X-ray random




grain



{223} <110>
intensity ratio




area


Steel type
orientation group
of {332} <113>
rL
rC
r30
r60
ratio/%





BA1
2.3
2.4
0.83
0.84
0.85
0.88
9


BB1
2.4
2.4
0.84
0.85
0.86
0.89
9


BB2
2.8
2.8
0.79
0.81
0.90
0.92
6


BC1
2.8
2.9
0.78
0.80
0.91
0.93
6


BD1
3.5
3.1
0.83
0.84
0.99
0.99
5


BE2
2.8
2.8
0.79
0.81
0.90
0.92
6


BF1
3.3
3.4
0.72
0.75
0.97
0.98
2


BF2
1.1
1.2
0.95
0.95
0.99
1.01
30 


BG1
2.8
2.8
0.78
0.80
0.91
0.93
6


BH1
3.4
3.4
0.72
0.76
0.97
0.98
2


BI1
3.0
3.2
0.74
0.77
0.94
0.95
5


BI2
2.7
2.8
0.78
0.80
0.90
0.92
6


BJ1
2.6
2.6
0.82
0.83
0.88
0.91
8


BJ2
2.7
2.8
0.78
0.80
0.90
0.92
7


BK1
3.1
3.2
0.76
0.79
0.95
0.96
5


BK2
3.4
3.4
0.73
0.76
0.99
0.99
3


BL1
2.8
2.9
0.78
0.80
0.91
0.93
6


BL2
3.2
3.2
0.74
0.77
0.95
0.96
2


BM1
3.7
2.9
0.87
0.87
0.99
0.99
5


BN1
3.0
3.0
0.74
0.77
0.92
0.94
5


BO1
2.8
2.6
0.78
0.80
0.89
0.91
6


BP1
3.0
3.1
0.74
0.77
0.94
0.95
5










(2/4)






















45°-direction









Sheet
bending/



equiaxed



Ts × λ/
thickness/minimum
C-direction


Steel type
grain rate/%
TS/MPa
El./%
λ/%
MPa-%
bending radius
bending ratio
Note





BA1
67
785
24
125
98125
6.4
1.0
Invention










steel


BB1
66
787
24
123
96801
6.3
1.0
Invention










steel


BB2
71
777
24
120
93240
5.0
1.1
Invention










steel


BC1
72
598
28
155
92690
4.8
1.1
Invention










steel


BD1
74
1216
14
 25
30400
4.1
1.1
Invention










steel


BE2
69
588
29
158
92904
5.0
1.1
Invention










steel


BF1
77
1198
14
 65
77870
3.6
1.3
Invention










steel


BF2
30
1100
5
 50
55000
6.0
1.0
Invention










steel


BG1
70
594
29
156
92664
4.8
1.1
Invention










steel


BH1
75
843
20
101
85143
3.6
1.3
Invention










steel


BI1
76
593
37
154
91322
4.1
1.2
Invention










steel


BI2
69
583
38
160
93280
5.0
1.1
Invention










steel


BJ1
69
607
36
157
95299
5.7
1.0
Invention










steel


BJ2
69
602
36
156
93912
5.0
1.1
Invention










steel


BK1
76
1194
16
 33
39402
4.1
1.2
Invention










steel


BK2
78
1194
16
 30
35820
3.5
1.3
Invention










steel


BL1
72
795
28
116
92220
4.8
1.1
Invention










steel


BL2
74
785
28
114
89490
3.9
1.2
Invention










steel


BM1
67
592
29
148
87616
4.2
1.1
Invention










steel


BN1
69
974
17
 78
75972
4.3
1.2
Invention










steel


BO1
63
874
19
100
87400
5.1
1.1
Invention










steel


BP1
74
1483
11
 58
86014
4.1
1.2
Invention










steel










(3/4)















X-ray random









intensity ratio of





coarsened



{100} <011> to
X-ray random




grain



{223} <110>
intensity ratio




area


Steel type
orientation group
of {332} <113>
rL
rC
r30
r60
ratio/%





BQ1
2.8
2.8
0.78
0.80
0.91
0.93
6


BR1
2.8
2.9
0.76
0.79
0.92
0.93
6


BS1
2.4
2.4
0.83
0.84
0.86
0.89
7


BS2
3.2
3.3
0.72
0.76
0.96
0.96
2


BT1
2.8
3.0
0.78
0.80
0.92
0.94
5


BT2
3.4
3.3
0.73
0.76
0.98
0.98
3


BU1
3.0
3.1
0.74
0.77
0.94
0.95
5


BV1
3.1
3.1
0.76
0.79
0.94
0.95
5


BW1
3.8
3.4
0.78
0.80
1.03
1.03
1


Ba1
2.8
2.9
0.77
0.79
0.96
0.97
6


Bb1
6.5
6.1
0.53
0.64
1.27
1.28
5


Bc1
6.2
6.4
0.42
0.56
1.20
1.22
4


Bd1
6.3
6.4
0.41
0.55
1.19
1.21
3


Be1
3.1
2.8
0.75
0.78
0.91
0.93
5


Bf1
6.4
6.3
0.42
0.56
1.18
1.20
3


Bg1
3.0
2.3
0.74
0.77
0.90
0.92
5










(4/4)






















45°-direction









Sheet
bending/



equiaxed



Ts × λ/
thickness/minimum
C-direction


Steel type
grain rate/%
TS/MPa
El./%
λ/%
MPa-%
bending radius
bending ratio
Note





BQ1
70
599
32
155 
92845
4.8
1.1
Invention










steel


BR1
72
1110
15
70
77700
4.6
1.1
Invention










steel


BS1
67
594
32
163 
96822
6.3
1.0
Invention










steel


BS2
74
590
32
152 
89680
3.7
1.2
Invention










steel


BT1
75
1004
19
74
74296
4.6
1.1
Invention










steel


BT2
75
989
19
71
70219
3.6
1.2
Invention










steel


BU1
74
665
26
140 
93100
4.1
1.2
Invention










steel


BV1
72
755
22
121 
91355
4.2
1.2
Invention










steel


BW1
76
1459
12
51
74409
3.4
1.2
Invention










steel


Ba1
73
892
14
21
18732
4.5
1.2
Comparative










steel


Bb1
34
912
12
27
24624
1.2
2.1
Comparative










steel


Bc1
38
892
15
61
54412
1.0
2.4
Comparative










steel


Bd1
27
1057
8
18
19026
1.0
2.4
Comparative










steel


Be1
67
583
26
83
48389
4.5
1.1
Comparative










steel


Bf1
72
1079
13
14
15106
1.0
2.3
Comparative










steel


Bg1
66
688
21
72
49536
5.0
1.1
Comparative










steel
















TABLE 6 





Chemical components (mass %)







(1/2)



















T1/° C.
C
Si
Mn
P
S
Al
N
O
Ti
Nb





CA
864
0.078
0.82
2.05
0.012
0.004
0.032
0.0026
0.0032
0.02
0.02


CB
852
0.085
0.75
2.25
0.012
0.003
0.035
0.0032
0.0023
—
—


CC
866
0.110
0.10
1.55
0.020
0.004
0.038
0.0033
0.0026
—
0.04


CD
863
0.350
1.80
2.33
0.012
0.003
0.710
0.0033
0.0021
0.02
—


CE
859
0.120
0.22
1.35
0.015
0.003
0.025
0.0055
0.0029
—
0.02


CF
884
0.068
0.50
3.20
0.122
0.002
0.040
0.0032
0.0038
0.03
0.07


CG
858
0.130
0.24
1.54
0.010
0.001
0.038
0.0025
0.0029
—
0.02


CH
899
0.035
0.05
2.20
0.010
0.020
0.021
0.0019
0.0023
0.15
0.03


CI
852
0.090
1.25
1.88
0.014
0.002
0.030
0.0030
0.0030
—
—


CJ
852
0.115
1.10
1.46
0.008
0.002
0.850
0.0034
0.0031
—
—


CK
861
0.144
0.45
2.52
0.007
0.001
0.021
0.0024
0.0031
0.03
—


CL
853
0.190
1.40
1.78
0.011
0.002
0.018
0.0032
0.0028
—
—


CM
866
0.080
0.10
1.40
0.007
0.002
1.700
0.0033
0.0034
—
—


CN
852
0.062
0.72
2.82
0.009
0.002
0.035
0.0033
0.0022
—
—


CO
885
0.120
0.80
2.20
0.008
0.002
0.035
0.0022
0.0035
0.05
—


CP
873
0.190
0.55
2.77
0.009
0.002
0.032
0.0033
0.0036
0.04
—


CQ
852
0.082
0.77
1.82
0.008
0.003
0.025
0.0032
0.0031
—
—


CR
875
0.030
1.00
2.40
0.005
0.001
0.033
0.0022
0.0011
0.05
0.01


CS
852
0.077
0.45
2.05
0.009
0.003
0.025
0.0029
0.0031
—
—


CT
861
0.142
0.70
2.44
0.008
0.002
0.030
0.0032
0.0035
0.03
—


CU
876
0.009
0.10
1.40
0.006
0.001
0.003
0.0033
0.0024
0.10
—


CV
853
0.150
0.61
2.20
0.011
0.002
0.028
0.0021
0.0036
—
—


CW
1043
0.120
0.17
2.26
0.028
0.009
0.033
0.0027
0.0019
—
—


Ca
860
0.440
0.50
2.20
0.008
0.002
0.035
0.0021
0.0012
—
—


Cb
854
0.080
0.45
4.50
0.200
0.002
0.034
0.0041
0.0015
—
—


Cc
914
0.080
0.35
2.00
0.008
0.002
0.033
0.0042
0.0034
0.25
—


Cd
939
0.070
0.35
2.40
0.008
0.002
0.035
0.0035
0.0026
—
0.25


Ce
851
0.090
0.10
1.00
0.008
0.040
0.036
0.0035
0.0022
—
—


Cf
952
0.070
0.21
2.20
0.008
0.002
0.033
0.0023
0.0036
—
—


Cg
853
0.140
0.11
1.90
0.008
0.002
0.032
0.0044
0.0035
—
—










(2/2)



















B
Mg
Rem
Ca
Mo
Cr
W
As
V
Others
Note





CA
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


CB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Co: 0.5%,
Invention












Sn: 0.02
steel


CC
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


CD
0.0020
—
0.0035
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


CE
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


CF
—
—
0.0044
—
—
0.1
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


CG
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


CH
—
—
0.0005
0.0009
—
—
0.05
—
—
—
Invention













steel


CI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


CJ
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


CK
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Cu: 0.5%,
Invention












Ni: 0.25
steel












Zr: 0.02%


CL
0.0002
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


CM
—
—
—
0.0022
—
—
—
—
0.15
—
Invention













steel


CN
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


CO
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.01
0.20
—
Invention













steel


CP
—
0.0055
—
—
0.022
—
—
—
0.05
—
Invention













steel


CQ
0.0002
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


CR
—
0.0040
0.004 
—
—
0.8
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


CS
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


CT
0.0002
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


CU
—
—
—
—
0.010
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


CV
—
0.0040
0.005 
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


CW
—
—
—
—
0.90 
—
—
—
—
—
Invention













steel


Ca
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Comparative













steel


Cb
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Comparative













steel


Cc
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Comparative













steel


Cd
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Comparative













steel


Ce
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Comparative













steel


Cf
—
0.020 
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.10
—
Comparative













steel


Cg
—
—
0.15 
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Comparative













steel
















TABLE 7





Manufacturing conditions







(1/2)























P1:










Rolling



Number of
Rolling

Total

Total
Tf:
reduction



times of
reduction

rolling
Temperature
rolling
Temperature
rate



rolling of
rate of

reduction
increase
reduction
after final
of final



20% or
20% or
Austenite
rate at
during
rate at
pass of
pass



more at
more at
grain
T1 + 30° C.
rolling at
T1° C. to
heavy
of heavy



1000° C. to
1000° C. to
diameter/
to
T1 + 30° C. to
lower than
rolling
rolling
















Steel type
T1/° C.
1200° C.
1200° C./%
μm
T1 + 200° C./%
T1 + 200° C./° C.
T1 + 30° C./%
pass/° C.
pass/%




















CA1
CA
864
2
45/45
80
85
16
0
984
45


CA2
CA
864
2
45/45
85
80
15
10 
934
45


CB1
CB
852
2
45/45
85
80
12
0
982
40


CB2
CB
852
2
45/45
80
85
15
0
922
45


CC1
CC
866
2
45/45
80
85
15
0
966
45


CC2
CC
866
0
—
250 
80
16
0
936
45


CD1
CD
863
1
50
120 
85
12
0
963
40


CD2
CD
863
2
50
130 
35
19
0
963
35


CE1
CE
859
2
45/45
90
95
12
40 
909
40


CE2
CE
859
2
45/45
80
80
17
0
929
45


CF1
CF
884
2
45/45
75
85
15
15 
944
45


CF2
CF
884
1
50
110 
80
11
0
954
40


CG1
CG
858
3
40/40/40
80
80
15
0
958
45


CG2
CG
858
2
40/40/40
80
80
12
10 
928
40


CH1
CH
899
2
45/45
80
80
12
20 
959
40


CI1
CI
852
2
45/45
75
90
14
0
952
40


CI2
CI
852
2
45/45
75
80
15
0
922
45


CJ1
CJ
852
3
40/40/40
85
85
11
0
962
45


CJ2
CJ
852
2
45/45
75
80
12
0
922
40


CK1
CK
861
3
40/40/40
85
90
12
0
961
40


CK2
CK
853
3
40/40/40
85
90
14
0
923
40


CL1
CL
853
2
45/45
80
85
17
0
953
45


CL2
CL
853
2
45/45
80
80
13
0
923
50


CM1
CM
866
1
20
150 
65
17
10 
966
40


CM2
CM
866
1
50
150 
60
11
0
966
50


CN1
CN
852
2
45/45
75
70
15
0
952
40


CO1
CO
885
2
45/45
80
60
14
0
985
45


CO2
CO
885
1
50
120 
20
15
10 
1100
45


CP1
CP
873
2
45/45
75
85
12
0
973
40


CQ1
CQ
852
2
45/45
80
80
16
0
952
45


CR1
CR
875
2
45/45
75
85
11
0
985
40


CS1
CS
852
2
45/45
80
85
12
0
992
40


CS2
CS
852
2
45/45
75
80
15
0
922
45


CT1
CT
861
2
45/45
80
95
14
15 
961
45


CT2
CT
861
2
45/45
85
80
13
0
931
40


CU1
CU
876
2
45/45
75
85
13
10 
976
40


CV1
CV
853
2
45/45
85
80
12
0
953
40


CW1
CW
1043
1
50
130 
80
16
10 
1083
45


Ca1
Ca
860
2
45/45
75
90
15
0
960
45


Cb1
Cb
854
1
50
120 
85
12
0
954
40


Cc1
Cc
914
2
45/45
75
90
12
0
994
40


Cd1
Cd
939
2
45/45
75
85
13
0
999
40


Ce1
Ce
851
2
45/45
80
65
11
0
951
40


Cf1
Cf
952
2
45/45
80
70
13
0
1012
40


Cg1
Cg
853
2
45/45
75
60
12
0
953
40










(2/2)




















t: Waiting












time from





completion





of heavy


Cold





rolling pass

Winding
rolling
Annealing
Annealing
Primary
Primary





to initiation

temperature/
reduction
temperature/
holding
cooling
cooling stop


Steel type
t1
2.5 × t1
of cooling/s
t/t1
° C.
rate/%
° C.
time/s
rate/° C./s
temperature/° C.





CA1
0.13
0.33
0.28
2.15
500
45
790
60
30
280


CA2
0.66
1.65
1.15
1.75
500
45
660
60
30
280


CB1
0.14
0.34
0.29
2.10
500
45
850
30
30
270


CB2
0.66
1.65
1.15
1.75
500
45
850
90
100
270


CC1
0.22
0.55
0.37
1.68
600
50
800
30
120
350


CC2
0.66
1.65
1.15
1.75
600
50
800
30
120
350


CD1
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
600
40
820
40
100
290


CD2
0.51
1.28
0.70
1.37
600
40
820
40
30
290


CE1
1.32
3.30
1.47
1.11
600
50
740
40
120
350


CE2
0.66
1.65
1.15
1.75
600
50
740
40
30
350


CF1
0.89
2.22
1.04
1.17
500
40
830
90
100
300


CF2
0.83
2.08
6.00
7.21
500
40
830
90
100
300


CG1
0.22
0.55
0.37
1.68
600
55
760
30
30
330


CG2
0.83
2.08
0.04
0.05
600
40
760
30
100
330


CH1
1.06
2.65
1.21
1.14
500
45
850
90
120
320


CI1
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
600
50
780
30
100
400


CI2
0.66
1.65
1.15
1.75
600
50
780
90
30
400


CJ1
0.15
0.39
0.30
1.97
600
50
780
30
30
410


CJ2
0.83
2.08
1.46
1.75
600
50
780
90
100
410


CK1
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
550
40
855
30
30
270


CK2
0.83
2.08
0.98
1.18
600
45
800
90
30
400


CL1
0.22
0.55
0.37
1.68
600
45
800
30
30
400


CL2
0.51
1.28
0.66
1.29
600
45
800
30
100
400


CM1
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
500
50
840
60
100
300


CM2
0.15
0.38
0.25
1.67
500
20
840
60
100
300


CN1
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
550
40
870
30
120
325


CO1
0.22
0.55
0.37
1.68
600
40
800
30
100
270


CO2
0.66
1.65
1.15
1.75
600
40
800
30
100
270


CP1
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
600
40
800
40
30
250


CQ1
0.22
0.55
0.37
1.68
600
50
810
40
110
350


CR1
0.24
0.60
0.39
1.63
500
40
830
90
100
350


CS1
0.13
0.33
0.28
2.14
550
55
780
60
30
320


CS2
0.66
1.65
0.81
1.23
550
45
780
60
100
320


CT1
0.22
0.55
0.37
1.68
500
50
870
30
100
350


CT2
0.83
2.08
0.98
1.18
500
50
870
30
30
350


CU1
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
500
45
850
30
120
350


CV1
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
600
50
860
40
100
320


CW1
1.46
3.66
1.61
1.10
550
40
800
40
120
350


Ca1
0.22
0.55
0.37
1.68
600
45
820
30
100
350


Cb1
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
600
45
820
30
100
350


Cc1
0.64
1.59
0.79
1.24
600
45
820
30
100
350


Cd1
1.06
2.65
1.21
1.14
600
45
820
30
100
350


Ce1
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
600
50
820
30
100
350


Cf1
1.06
2.65
1.21
1.14
600
40
820
30
100
350


Cg1
0.34
0.85
0.49
1.44
600
55
820
30
100
350
















TABLE 8





The structure and mechanical characteristics of the respective


steels in the respective manufacturing conditions







(1/4)












X-ray random






intensity ratio of


coarsened



{100} <011> to
X-ray random

grain



{223} <110>
intensity ratio

area














Steel type
orientation group
of {332} <113>
rL
rC
r30
r60
ratio/%


















CA1
CA
2.6
2.5
0.83
0.84
0.85
0.88
9


CA2
CA
4.4
3.0
0.80
0.81
0.90
0.92
15 


CB1
CB
2.1
2.6
0.84
0.85
0.86
0.89
8


CB2
CB
2.5
3.0
0.79
0.81
0.90
0.92
6


CC1
CC
3.0
2.5
0.78
0.80
0.91
0.93
5


CC2
CC
5.0
3.5
0.40
0.40
1.26
1.15
15 


CD1
CD
3.1
3.8
0.83
0.84
0.99
0.99
5


CD2
CD
5.1
5.8
0.84
0.85
0.95
0.96
12 


CE1
CE
5.2
7.1
0.73
0.75
1.01
1.01
8


CE2
CE
3.6
2.5
0.79
0.81
0.90
0.92
5


CF1
CF
3.2
4.0
0.72
0.75
0.97
0.98
3


CF2
CF
1.1
1.2
0.95
0.95
0.99
1.01
30 


CG1
CG
3.4
2.0
0.78
0.80
0.91
0.93
4


CG2
CG
5.1
5.2
0.61
0.66
1.40
1.38
30 


CH1
CH
3.1
3.6
0.72
0.76
0.97
0.98
1


CI1
CI
3.5
2.8
0.74
0.77
0.94
0.95
3


CI2
CI
3.2
2.5
0.78
0.80
0.90
0.92
5


CJ1
CJ
2.9
2.2
0.82
0.83
0.88
0.91
7


CJ2
CJ
3.2
2.5
0.78
0.80
0.90
0.92
5


CK1
CK
2.7
3.8
0.76
0.79
0.95
0.96
5


CK2
CK
3.5
3.5
0.73
0.76
0.99
0.99
2


CL1
CL
3.0
3.0
0.78
0.80
0.91
0.93
6


CL2
CL
3.4
3.4
0.74
0.77
0.95
0.96
3










(2/4)



















Sheet
45°-direction




equiaxed



thickness/minimum
bending/


Steel
grain



bending radius
C-direction


type
rate/%
TS/MPa
El./%
λ/%
(C bending)
bending ratio
Note





CA1
67
785
24
121
5.8
1.0
Invention









steel


CA2
29
805
15
 61
0.6
1.6
Comparative









steel


CB1
66
788
24
130
6.5
1.0
Invention









steel


CB2
71
778
24
125
5.1
1.1
Invention









steel


CC1
72
598
28
154
4.9
1.1
Invention









steel


CC2
39
598
22
 81
1.2
2.9
Comparative









steel


CD1
74
1216
14
 29
3.9
1.1
Invention









steel


CD2
58
1211
8
 10
0.4
1.7
Comparative









steel


CE1
81
585
29
 82
0.8
1.8
Comparative









steel


CE2
69
588
29
151
4.6
1.1
Invention









steel


CF1
77
1198
14
 66
3.3
1.3
Invention









steel


CF2
30
1100
5
 50
6.0
1.0
Invention









steel


CG1
70
594
29
150
5.0
1.1
Invention









steel


CG2
30
544
26
 71
1.4
2.1
Comparative









steel


CH1
75
844
20
104
3.6
1.3
Invention









steel


CI1
76
593
37
150
4.1
1.2
Invention









steel


CI2
69
583
38
155
4.9
1.1
Invention









steel


CJ1
69
608
36
153
5.7
1.0
Invention









steel


CJ2
69
603
36
151
4.9
1.1
Invention









steel


CK1
76
1194
16
 38
3.9
1.2
Invention









steel


CK2
78
1194
16
 30
3.4
1.3
Invention









steel


CL1
72
795
28
114
4.5
1.1
Invention









steel


CL2
74
785
28
112
3.6
1.2
Invention









steel










(3/4)












X-ray random






intensity ratio of


coarsened



{100} <011> to
X-ray random

grain



{223} <110>
intensity ratio

area














Steel type
orientation group
of {332} <113>
rL
rC
r30
r60
ratio/%


















CM1
CM
2.9
2.8
0.89
0.89
1.00
1.00
3


CM2
CM
2.6
5.5
0.93
0.92
0.96
0.97
15


CN1
CN
2.6
3.8
0.74
0.77
0.92
0.94
5


CO1
CO
3.0
3.5
0.78
0.80
0.89
0.91
7


CO2
CO
5.0
5.5
0.58
0.58
1.18
1.31
17 


CP1
CP
3.3
3.8
0.74
0.77
0.94
0.95
5


CQ1
CQ
2.9
2.5
0.78
0.80
0.91
0.93
5


CR1
CR
2.8
3.6
0.76
0.79
0.92
0.93
6


CS1
CS
2.8
2.6
0.83
0.84
0.86
0.89
7


CS2
CS
3.7
3.5
0.72
0.76
0.96
0.96
2


CT1
CT
2.3
2.5
0.78
0.80
0.92
0.94
4


CT2
CT
2.8
3.0
0.73
0.76
0.98
0.98
1


CU1
CU
2.8
3.3
0.74
0.77
0.94
0.95
4


CV1
CV
2.7
2.8
0.76
0.79
0.94
0.95
3


CW1
CW
3.6
4.1
0.79
0.81
1.05
1.04
2


Ca1
Ca
2.8
3.0
0.77
0.79
0.96
0.97
6


Cb1
Cb
8.1
9.3
0.53
0.64
1.27
1.28
4


Cc1
Cc
8.3
9.5
0.42
0.56
1.20
1.22
3


Cd1
Cd
8.4
9.6
0.41
0.55
1.19
1.21
2


Ce1
Ce
3.1
2.8
0.75
0.78
0.91
0.93
3


Cf1
Cf
6.4
8.1
0.42
0.56
1.18
1.20
3


Cg1
Cg
3.1
2.3
0.74
0.77
0.90
0.92
2










(4/4)



















Sheet
45°-direction




equiaxed



thickness/minimum
bending/


Steel
grain



bending radius
C-direction


type
rate/%
TS/MPa
El./%
λ/%
(C bending)
bending ratio
Note





CM1
67
592
29
157 
5.0
1.1
Invention









steel


CM2
30
592
25
99
0.5
1.5
Comparative









steel


CN1
69
974
17
84
4.1
1.2
Invention









steel


CO1
63
874
19
98
4.2
1.1
Invention









steel


CO2
29
884
14
23
1.4
2.0
Invention









steel


CP1
74
1483
11
56
3.6
1.2
Invention









steel


CQ1
70
600
32
154 
5.0
1.1
Invention









steel


CR1
72
1110
15
71
4.2
1.1
Invention









steel


CS1
67
594
32
157 
5.7
1.0
Invention









steel


CS2
74
590
32
149 
3.4
1.2
Invention









steel


CT1
75
1004
19
82
5.5
1.1
Invention









steel


CT2
75
989
19
78
4.1
1.2
Invention









steel


CU1
74
665
26
143 
4.2
1.2
Invention









steel


CV1
72
756
22
126 
4.8
1.2
Invention









steel


CW1
76
1459
12
53
3.1
1.2
Invention









steel


Ca1
73
893
14
21
4.4
1.2
Comparative









steel


Cb1
34
912
12
28
0.8
2.1
Comparative









steel


Cc1
38
893
15
61
0.7
2.4
Comparative









steel


Cd1
27
1058
8
18
0.7
2.4
Comparative









steel


Ce1
67
583
26
83
4.5
1.1
Comparative









steel


Cf1
72
1079
13
14
0.9
2.3
Comparative









steel


Cg1
66
688
21
72
5.0
1.1
Comparative









steel
















TABLE 9





Chemical components (mass %)




























T1/° C.
C
Si
Mn
P
S
Al
N
O
Ti
Nb
B





DA
857
0.114
0.05
2.15
0.012
0.004
0.590
0.0026
0.0032
—
—
0.0005


DB
868
0.087
0.62
2.03
0.012
0.003
0.180
0.0032
0.0023
0.022
0.017
0.0012


DC
852
0.140
0.87
1.20
0.009
0.004
0.038
0.0033
0.0026
—
—
—


DD
858
0.145
0.10
2.33
0.012
0.003
0.710
0.0033
0.0021
0.017
—
0.0005


DE
873
0.220
0.13
2.96
0.015
0.003
0.120
0.0029
0.0029
0.024
0.021
—


DF
882
0.068
0.50
2.31
0.009
0.002
0.040
0.0032
0.0038
0.03 
0.065
—


DG
851
0.061
0.11
2.20
0.010
0.001
0.038
0.0025
0.0029
—
—
—


DH
900
0.035
0.05
1.80
0.010
0.001
0.021
0.0019
0.0023
0.17 
0.02 
0.0014


DI
861
0.410
0.08
2.60
0.190
0.002
0.041
0.0029
0.003
—
—
—


DJ
1220
0.051
0.07
1.67
0.008
0.002
0.029
0.0034
0.0031
0.65 
0.59 
—


DK
853
0.150
0.61
2.20
0.011
0.002
0.028
0.0021
0.0036
—
—
—


DL
1045
0.120
0.17
2.26
0.028
0.090
0.033
0.0027
0.0019
—
—
0.0520




















Mg
Rem
Ca
Mo
Cr
V
W
As
Others





DA
—
—
—
 0.04
—
—
—
—
—


DB
—
—
—
—
0.44
—
—
—
—


DC
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—


DD
—
0.0014
—
—
—
—
—
—
—


DE
0.0035
—
0.0015
—
—
0.029
—
—
—


DF
—
0.0021
—
—
—
—
—
—
—


DG
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.05
0.01
Cu: 0.5%,











Ni: 0.25%,











Co: 0.5,











Sn: 0.02%,











Zr: 0.02%


DH
—
0.0005
0.0009

—
—
—
—
—


DI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—


DJ
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—


DK
0.090 
0.10 
—
—
—
—
—
—
—


DL
—
—
—
1.9
—
—
—
—
—
















TABLE 10 





Manufacturing conditions







(1/2)























P1:










Rolling



Number of
Rolling

Total

Total

reduction



times of
reduction

rolling
Temperature
rolling
Tf:
rate



rolling of
rate of

reduction
increase
reduction
Temperature
of final



20% or
20% or
Austenite
rate at
during
rate at
after final
pass



more at
more at
grain
T1 + 30° C.
rolling at
T1° C. to
pass of
of heavy



1000° C. to
1000° C. to
diameter/
to
T1 + 30° C. to
lower than
heavy rolling
rolling
















Steel type
T1/° C.
1200° C.
1200° C./%
μm
T1 + 200° C./%
T1 + 200° C./° C.
T1 + 30° C./%
pass/° C.
pass




















30
DA
857
1
50
130 
90
15
 0
955
45


31
DA
857
2
45/45
85
85
10
 0
975
40


32
DB
868
2
45/45
85
80
10
10
950
35


33
DB
868
2
45/45
90
85
10
 5
925
35


34
DC
852
2
45/45
90
85
15
15
960
30


35
DC
852
2
45/45
95
95
17
 0
935
35


36
DD
858
3
40/40/40
70
85
15
25
980
30


37
DE
873
2
45/45
85
80
17
 5
955
30


38
DE
873
1
50
110 
80
18
15
925
30


39
DF
882
3
40/40/40
75
90
18
 0
965
35


40
DG
851
3
40/40/40
95
85
10
 0
945
35


41
DH
900
2
45/45
75
90
13
 0
990
40


42
DH
900
2
45/45
80
85
15
10
985
40


43
DF
882
1
50
100 
65
20
25
935
45


44
DG
851
1
50
150 
70
20
15
905
45


45
DG
851
1
20
150 
60
21
20
890
45


46
DH
900
1
50
120 
65
19
10
950
45


47
DH
900
1
50
120 
35
12
45
880
30


48
DA
857
2
45/45
90
45
20
45
900
30


49
DB
868
2
45/45
90
45
15
45
1050
30


50
DC
852
2
40/45
85
70
15
45
890
30


51
DG
851
0
—
370 
45
30
35
885
45


52
DE
873
1
50
120 
80
40
35
860
40


53
DA
857
0
—
240 
60
18
20
855
30


54
DC
852
0
—
220 
85
14
25
880
45


55
DA
852
2
45/45
85
85
10
 0
975
40


56
DB
852
2
45/45
90
85
10
 5
925
35


57
DC
852
2
45/45
90
85
25
15
910
45


58
DG
851
3
40/40/40
95
85
22
 0
905
40










59
DI
861
Cracked during casting or hot rolling


60
DJ
1220
Cracked during casting or hot rolling


61
DK
853
Cracked during casting or hot rolling


62
DL
1045
Cracked during casting or hot rolling










(2/2)




















t: Waiting












time from





completion





of heavy


Cold





rolling pass


rolling

Annealing
Primary
Primary


Steel


to initiation

Winding
reduction
Annealing
holding
cooling
cooling stop


type
t1
2.5 × t1
of cooling/s
t/t1
temperature/° C.
rate/%
temperature/° C.
time/s
rate/° C./s
temperature/° C.





30
0.23
0.58
0.30
1.28
580
60
820
60
3
650


31
0.18
0.45
0.20
1.11
520
60
820
60
3
650


32
0.79
1.98
1.10
1.39
550
50
840
30
5
680


33
1.32
3.29
1.90
1.44
600
50
840
30
5
680


34
0.61
1.54
0.90
1.46
550
50
830
40
3
640


35
0.77
1.93
1.00
1.29
570
50
830
40
3
640


36
0.45
1.12
0.60
1.34
530
45
850
90
2
700


37
1.02
2.55
1.50
1.47
600
40
825
90
2
680


38
1.64
4.10
2.40
1.46
600
40
825
90
2
680


39
0.78
1.94
1.00
1.29
620
60
850
30
5
650


40
0.60
1.51
0.90
1.49
600
60
860
30
5
650


41
0.48
1.19
0.70
1.47
450
50
680
30
5
620


42
0.55
1.38
0.70
1.26
450
50
680
30
5
620


43
1.07
2.67
2.00
1.88
620
60
850
30
5
650


44
1.05
2.63
1.50
1.43
600
60
860
30
5
650


45
1.51
3.77
2.60
1.72
600
60
860
30
5
650


46
1.16
2.90
1.50
1.29
600
60
860
30
5
650


47
3.80
9.49
4.00
1.05
600
60
860
30
5
650


48
1.85
4.62
4.80
2.60
580
60
820
60
3
650


49
0.13
0.32
0.10
0.77
550
50
840
30
5
680


50
1.98
4.95
1.00
0.51
550
50
840
30
5
680


51
1.68
4.20
0.40
0.24
600
40
825
90
2
680


52
3.69
9.22
9.00
2.44
530
45
850
90
2
700


53
3.15
7.88
0.80
0.25
580
60
820
60
3
650


54
1.87
4.69
2.00
1.07
570
50
830
40
3
640


55
0.16
0.39
0.20
1.28
720
60
780
60
  0.05
725


56
0.96
2.41
2.00
2.08
600
50
950
  0.5
5
600


57
0.93
2.32
1.00
1.08
750
10
830
40
3
640


58
1.22
3.06
1.30
1.06
600
60
600
30
5
650








59
Cracked during casting or hot rolling


60
Cracked during casting or hot rolling


61
Cracked during casting or hot rolling


62
Cracked during casting or hot rolling
















TABLE 11





The structure and mechanical characteristics of the respective


steels in the respective manufacturing conditions







(1/2)











X-ray random





intensity ratio of



{100} <011> to
X-ray random



{223} <110>
intensity ratio













Steel type
orientation group
of {332} <113>
rL
rC
r30
r60

















30
DA
2.5
2.2
0.81
0.86
0.97
0.98


31
DA
2.4
2.3
0.85
0.82
0.92
0.91


32
DB
2.1
2.3
0.90
0.93
0.92
0.98


33
DB
2.3
2.5
0.88
0.91
0.98
1.00


34
DC
2.5
2.3
0.78
0.75
0.85
0.82


35
DC
2.6
2.8
0.85
0.89
0.98
1.00


36
DD
3.0
3.1
0.70
0.70
1.08
1.08


37
DE
2.9
3.0
0.76
0.80
1.06
1.05


38
DE
3.3
3.0
0.72
1.00
0.97
1.09


39
DF
2.3
2.4
0.85
0.88
1.03
1.05


40
DG
2.4
2.3
0.82
0.90
1.00
0.98


41
DH
2.7
2.8
0.73
0.75
0.98
1.00


42
DH
2.9
3.0
0.75
0.78
0.95
1.10


43
DF
3.9
4.8
0.63
0.76
1.05
1.20


44
DG
3.4
3.7
0.62
0.77
1.08
1.19


45
DG
3.9
4.8
0.60
0.75
1.10
1.28


46
DH
3.9
4.9
0.62
0.80
1.04
1.17


47
DH
6.7
6.7
0.51
0.61
1.25
1.30


48
DA
4.1
5.3
0.63
0.68
1.12
1.20


49
DB
5.8
5.2
0.55
0.69
1.18
1.26


50
DC
6.8
5.9
0.60
0.65
1.13
1.15


51
DG
7.2
5.1
0.50
0.69
1.20
1.29


52
DE
6.8
6.0
0.50
0.65
1.16
1.20


53
DA
3.9
5.2
0.59
0.75
1.06
1.24


54
DC
3.8
5.1
0.68
0.72
1.18
1.10


55
DA
4.2
5.1
0.67
0.65
1.15
1.16


56
DB
5.8
5.2
0.69
0.60
1.11
1.13


57
DC
4.9
5.8
0.54
0.65
0.90
1.11


58
DG
6.5
6.1
0.52
0.60
0.89
1.13









59
DI
Cracked during casting or hot rolling


60
DJ
Cracked during casting or hot rolling


61
DK
Cracked during casting or hot rolling


62
DL
Cracked during casting or hot rolling










(2/2)


















Sheet



Steel



TS × λ/
thickness/minimum


type
TS/MPa
El./%
λ/%
MPa-%
bending radius
Note





30
1000
16
55
55000
3.6
Invention








steel


31
1010
17
60
60600
4.0
Invention








steel


32
1050
16
65
68250
5.3
Invention








steel


33
1065
15
70
74550
5.3
Invention








steel


34
1230
13
60
73800
3.6
Invention








steel


35
1250
12
55
68750
4.5
Invention








steel


36
1275
10
50
63750
3.2
Invention








steel


37
1485
9
50
74250
2.6
Invention








steel


38
1475
8
55
81125
2.3
Invention








steel


39
805
24
75
60375
2.8
Invention








steel


40
635
32
60
38100
4.7
Invention








steel


41
785
22
145
113825
3.6
Invention








steel


42
800
21
140
112000
3.0
Invention








steel


43
840
19
60
50400
1.8
Invention








steel


44
640
30
50
32000
1.8
Invention








steel


45
630
31
45
28350
1.6
Invention








steel


46
825
17
100
82500
1.6
Invention








steel


47
805
19
80
64400
0.9
Comparative








steel


48
980
18
30
29400
0.9
Comparative








steel


49
1100
12
45
49500
0.8
Comparative








steel


50
990
16
35
34650
0.9
Comparative








steel


51
650
29
40
26000
0.9
Comparative








steel


52
1490
8
30
44700
0.7
Comparative








steel


53
985
16
35
34475
1.1
Comparative








steel


54
1265
9
45
56925
1.1
Comparative








steel


55
890
17
30
26700
0.8
Comparative








steel


56
1150
10
35
40250
0.8
Comparative








steel


57
1240
12
35
43400
0.9
Comparative








steel


58
560
30
40
22400
0.9
Comparative








steel









59
Cracked during casting or hot rolling
Comparative




steel


60
Cracked during casting or hot rolling
Comparative




steel


61
Cracked during casting or hot rolling
Comparative




steel


62
Cracked during casting or hot rolling
Comparative




steel

## Claims

1. A hot-rolled steel sheet comprising, by mass %:
C: 0.0001% to 0.40%;
Si: 0.001% to 2.5%;
Mn: 0.001% to 4.0%;
P: 0.001% to 0.15%;
S: 0.0005% to 0.03%;
Al: 0.001% to 2.0%;
N: 0.0005% to 0.01%;
O: 0.0005% to 0.01%;
and further comprising one or two or more of:
Ti: 0.001% to 0.20%;
Nb: 0.001% to 0.20%;
V: 0.001% to 1.0%;
W: 0.001% to 1.0%;
B: 0.0001% to 0.0050%;
Mo: 0.001% to 1.0%;
Cr: 0.001% to 2.0%;
Cu: 0.001% to 2.0%;
Ni: 0.001% to 2.0%;
Co: 0.0001% to 1.0%;
Sn: 0.0001% to 0.2%;
Zr: 0.0001% to 0.2%;
As: 0.0001% to 0.50%;
Mg: 0.0001% to 0.010%;
Ca: 0.0001% to 0.010%; and
REM: 0.0001% to 0.1%;
and balance composed of iron and inevitable impurities,
wherein an average value of an X-ray random intensity ratio of a {100} <011> to {223}<110> orientation group at least in a sheet thickness central portion that is in a sheet thickness range of 5⁄8 to 3⁄8 from a steel sheet surface is 1.0 to 6.0, an X-ray random intensity ratio of a {332} <113> crystal orientation is 1.0 to 5.0; and
rC which is an r value in a direction perpendicular to a rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10, and r30 which is an r value in a direction that forms an angle of 30° with respect to the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10.

2. The hot-rolled steel sheet according to claim 1,
wherein rL which is an r value in the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10, and r60 which is an r value in a direction that forms an angle of 60° with respect to the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10.

3. The hot-rolled steel sheet according to claim 1,
wherein one or two or more of bainite, martensite, pearlite, and austenite are present in the hot-rolled steel sheet, and a proportion of grains having a dL/dt, which is a ratio of a length in the rolling direction dL to a length of a sheet thickness direction dt, of 3.0 or less in crystal grains in the structures is 50% to 100%.

4. The hot-rolled steel sheet according to claim 1,
wherein an area proportion of crystal grains having a grain diameter of more than 20 μm in a total area of a metallic structure in the hot-rolled steel sheet is 0% to 10%.

5. A cold-rolled steel sheet obtained through cold rolling of the hot-rolled steel sheet according to claim 1,
wherein the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group at least in the sheet thickness central portion is 1.0 to less than 4.0, the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation is 1.0 to 5.0; and
rC which is the r value in a direction perpendicular to the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10, and r30 which is the r value in a direction that forms an angle of 30° with respect to the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10.

6. The cold-rolled steel sheet according to claim 5,
wherein rL which is an r value in the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10, and r60 which is an r value in a direction that forms an angle of 60° with respect to the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10.

7. The cold-rolled steel sheet according to claim 5,
wherein one or two or more of bainite, martensite, pearlite, and austenite are present in the cold-rolled steel sheet, and a proportion of grains having a dL/dt, which is a ratio of a length in the rolling direction dL to a length of a sheet thickness direction dt, of 3.0 or less in crystal grains in the structures is 50% to 100%.

8. The cold-rolled steel sheet according to claim 5,
wherein an area proportion of crystal grains having a grain diameter of more than 20 μm in a total area of a metallic structure in the cold-rolled steel sheet is 0% to 10%.

9. A galvanized steel sheet further comprising a galvanized coating layer or a galvanealed coating layer on a surface of the cold-rolled steel sheet according to claim 5,
wherein the average value of the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {100} <011> to {223} <110> orientation group at least in the sheet thickness central portion is 1.0 to less than 4.0, the X-ray random intensity ratio of the {332} <113> crystal orientation is 1.0 to 5.0; and
rC which is the r value in a direction perpendicular to the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10, and r30 which is the r value in a direction that forms an angle of 30° with respect to the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10.

10. The galvanized steel sheet according to claim 9,
wherein rL which is an r value in the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10, and r60 which is an r value in a direction that forms an angle of 60° with respect to the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10.