alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 Current Report Filed Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report
(Date of earliest event reported): January 30, 2007
 Repros Therapeutics Inc.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
(State or other 
jurisdiction of 
incorporation or 
organization)
    
    001-15281
(Commission File Number)
    
    76-0233274
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 2408 Timberloch Place, Suite B-7
The Woodlands, Texas 77380
(Address of principal
executive offices
and zip code)
(281) 719-3400
(Registrants telephone
number, including area
code)
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  SIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXUnderwriting AgreementOpinion of WinsteadPress Release    Table of Contents  Item 8.01.
Other Events
   Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits
  ExhibitNumber
    
    Description1.1
    
    Underwriting
Agreement, dated January 30, 20075.1
    
    Opinion of Winstead99.1
    
    Press Release dated January 31, 2007




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  Date: January 31, 2007.
    Repros Therapeutics Inc.By:
    /s/ Louis Ploth, Jr.Louis Ploth, Jr.Vice President, Business Development and
Chief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description1.1
    
    Underwriting
Agreement, dated January 30, 20075.1
    
    Opinion of Winstead99.1
    
    Press Release dated January 31, 2007
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 201 2

- 0334 Directorate Identifier: 2012

-NM

- 001

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update a ccordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed c ell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine, propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost T otal Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet
Inspection 1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

Repair 1.0 $ 85.00 $50 $ 135.00 Replacement 4.0 $ 340.00 $200 $ 540.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulat ory Flexibility Act:**  Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO

* 

### Explanation :
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Certification of Chief Executive Officer



In connection  with the Quarterly Report of Igen Networks Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Monty Ormsby, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













: May 17, 2011             /s/

Monty Ormsby

-------------------              -----------------------------------



Monty Ormsby



Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

 

**Section 1350Certification**

 

In connection with this quarterly report of ML Systematic MomentumFuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of MerrillLynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  November 12, 2010 |                                          |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                          |                                          |
| By:                           | /s/  BARBRA E. KOCSIS                         |   |
|                          | Barbra  E. Kocsis                             |   |
|                          | Chief  Financial Officer                      |   |
|                          | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

 

----
# Official Journal L 37/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 37 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 619 February 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 37

English edition

Legislation

Volume 619 February 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/179 of 25 September 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 1233/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of certain guidelines in the field of officially supported export credits | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/179 of 25 September 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 1233/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of certain guidelines in the field of officially supported export credits

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-51118

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAFAEL DE LA CRUZ FERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-1084-ALL

--------------------

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rafael De La Cruz

Fernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### SNELL v. McCRACKEN.

No. 9308.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

April 11, 1934.

I. W. Keys and Johns, MeCampbell & Snyder, all of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

E. H. Crenshaw, Jr., of Kingsville, for ap-pellee.

SMITH, Justice.

This action was brought by appellee, W. E. McCracken, against appellant, Pauline S. Snell, to recover upon a promissory note and foreclose the vendor’s lien upon real property. The note and lien had been transferred to appellee by the original payee.

In her first proposition, appellant complains of the action of the trial court in overruling her motion to quash the citation by which she was summoned to defend the case, and thereupon forcing her into trial. The motion to quash was based upon the allegation that the citation failed to show the date upon which appellee’s original petition was filed. It appears in this connection that the *trial*judge, upon motion, permitted the citation to be amended by inserting the omitted date, thus curing the defect complained of in appellant’s first proposition, which will be overruled.

It was within the discretion of the court to permit the amendment to the citation, and no error is assigned here to that action.

No harm is shown to have resulted to appellant by reason of the ruling upon the motion to quash. The whole burden of her complaint is encompassed in the contention that she was forced into trial before she was ready; but as she did not move for continu-ánee or delay .below, she cannot complain here.

Appellant complains, in her second proposition, of the exclusion of certain evidence offered by her upon the trial. The circumstances of the ruling complained of are not sufficiently shown in the brief to invoke review on appeal. In order to invoke such review it was incumbent upon appellant to set out in her brief the evidence tendered, the objections made thereto, the ruling thereon, together with related pleadings and other facts bearing upon the competency and materiality of the proffered testimony. It is true that appellant gives record references purporting to disclose the transaction, but the burden rests upon appellant to bring for*489ward the substance, at least, of such matters, into her brief, and relieve an appellate court of the burden of searching the record to find the true light upon the subject. The. gist of appellant’s contention is that she made certain payments on the note, and deposited certain collateral with appellee’s assignor as security therefor, and was entitled to, but was denied, credits for the amounts thereof. Instead of bringing forward into her brief the pleadings and testimony relied upon to support these contentions, the objections upon which the testimony was rejected, the court’s rulings thereon, and any other matters relevant to the transactions, appellant simply refers this court to the records purporting to supply these matters. That is not a sufficient presentation of the appeal. For this reason appellant’s second, third, and fourth propositions will be overruled.

The judgment is affirmed.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 I 0 0 52

. CAT DADDY CORNER CONDOMI NI UM A S SOCI ATI ON, I NC.

v . LA MARA I I , I NC., d/ b/ a LOS ARCOS, et a l

.

Cat Dad d y Co rn er Co n d o m i n i um As s o ci at i o n, In c. (t h e “ As s o ci at i on ”) fi l ed an

ap p li cat io n fo r in terl ocu t o ry ap p eal fro m a si ng l e o rd er en tered in t wo cas es fi l ed in

t h e t ri al co u rt

. On e o f t h e cas es was fi l ed i n 2 0 1 6

, an d t h e o th er was fi led i n 2 0 1 8.

Th e t wo cas es were n o t co n s ol i d at ed b el o w b u t are rel a t e d c a s e s

. O n Oct o b er 2 3,

2 0 1 8

, w e d i s m i s s ed t h is ap p l i cat i o n o n t h e gro u n d t h at it was su p erfl uo u s du e t o t h e

n o t i ce o f ap p eal fi l ed i n t h e 2 0 1 8 cas e. Th e As so ci at io n fi l ed a m o t i o n fo r

reco n s i d erat i on o f th i s Co urt ’ s o rd er, an d h av in g co n s i d ere d t h e arg u m en t s rai s ed

t h erei n , we h ereb y

VACATE o u r o rd er o f Oct o ber 2 3 , 2 0 18 , an d REINSTATE an d

GRANT t h e ap p l i cat io n

.

Th e As s o ci at i o n s h al l h av e t en day s fro m t he dat e o f t h i s o rd er t o fi l e a n o t i ce

o f ap p eal i n th e t ri al co u rt i n th e 2 0 1 6 cas e. If i t h as al read y fi led a n o t i ce o f ap p eal

i n t h at cas e fro m t h e o rd er at i s s u e h ere, i t n e e d n o t fi l e a s eco n d n o t ice. Th e cl erk

o f t h e t ri al co u rt i s DIRECTED t o i ncl u d e a co p y o f t h i s o rd er i n t h e reco rd

t ran s m i t t ed t o t h e Co u rt o f Ap p eal s

. December 05, 2018C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 12/05/2018
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

     In connection with the Report on Form 10-Q of Elko Ventures Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended May 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Matt Wayrynen, as Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: June 19, 2008                By: /s/ Matt Wayrynen
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                      Matt Wayrynen
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      Chief Financial Officer

     This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GD Conference Center, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Destler, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 14th day of August, 2007.

 

/s/ Peter Destler

Name: Peter Destler

Title: President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
ex_97450.htm


Exhibit 4.10


 


LOAN 


(Principal and Interest at Maturity)


 


In consideration of value received, the undersigned (hereinafter "Hoverink Biotechnologies, Inc. Borrower") does hereby promise to pay to w. Cyrus Sajna (hereinafter "Lender"), the amount of $_115,060_____ upon which interest will accrue at _0__ percent per annum. Borrower agrees to pay all accrued interest plus principal on the _22nd_ day of __Sept___ 2022_. Any payments shall be first applied to interest and then to the principal. This loan may be paid in full at any time without penalty charges. 


 


In the event this Loan shall be in default, and collection proceedings are instituted, then the Borrower does so agree to pay all reasonable attorney fees and costs of collection.


 


The undersigned and all other parties to this loan, whether as endorsers, guarantors or sureties waive demand, presentment and protest and all notices thereto and further agree to remain bound, notwithstanding any extension, modification, waiver, or other indulgence by any holder or upon the discharge or release of any obligor hereunder or to this loan, or upon the exchange, substitution, or release of any collateral granted as security for this Note. 


 


 


	 	 	 	 
	
			Debbie Mae Carter


			Hoverink Biotechnologies, Inc

				 	 	 
	
			Borrower

				 	Date 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
			Cyrus Sajna

				 	 	 
	
			Lender   

				 	Date
# Official Journal L 4/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 4 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 638 January 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 4

English edition

Legislation

Volume 638 January 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/7 of 19 December 2019 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Huile d’olive de la Vallée des Baux-de-Provence’ (PDO)) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/7 of 19 December 2019 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Huile d’olive de la Vallée des Baux-de-Provence’ (PDO))

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John J. Dolan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FirstCommonwealth Financial Corporation ("the Corporation"), certify thatthe Quarterly Report of the Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information containedin such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition of the Corporation at the end of such period and the results ofoperations of the Corporation for such period.

| DATED:  November 10, 2003 | /s/John  J.  Dolan             |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | John  J. Dolan                                                                             |
|                      | Executive  Vice President and 

Chief  Financial Officer                                   |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to First CommonwealthFinancial Corporation and will be retained by First Commonwealth FinancialCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                              69
<SECURITIES>                                     5,290
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,832
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,876
<PP&E>                                         828,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                 193,173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 663,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,540
<BONDS>                                        148,735
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     199,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   663,920
<SALES>                                         76,458
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,458
<CGS>                                            4,877
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,391
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,481
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,213
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,268
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,268
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00<F1>
<FN>
<F1>*All common stock is owned by parent, no EPS required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>