alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 130740(27) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130740 COA: 265543 Ionia CC: 92-000969-FC RANDY ALLEN McELHANEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s July 31, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ISRAEL CARDONA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-75194

Agency No. A097-895-278

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 16, 2010** 

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Israel Cardona, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

NOV 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-75194

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Cerezo v.

Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except to the extent that deference

is owed to the BIA’s determination of the governing statutes and regulations,

Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We review for

substantial evidence factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182,

1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.

 We reject Cardona’s claim that he is eligible for asylum and withholding of

removal based on his anti-gang political opinion or membership in a particular

social group. See Ramos-Lopez v. Holder, 563 F.3d 855, 860-62 (9th Cir. 2009)

(concluding young Salvadoran men who are recruited by gangs and refuse to join

is not a social group, and refusal to join gangs is not a political opinion);

Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2009) (“[t]he Real ID Act

requires that a protected ground represent ‘one central reason’ for an asylum

applicant’s persecution”). Accordingly, because Cardona failed to demonstrate he

was or will be persecuted on account of a protected ground, we deny the petition as

to his asylum and withholding claims. See Barrios v. Holder, 581 F.3d 849, 856

(9th Cir. 2009).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because

Cardona failed to show it is more likely than not that he would be tortured if
3 08-75194

returned to El Salvador. See Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 747-48 (9th

Cir. 2008).

Cardona’s due process contention regarding the BIA’s issuance of a

streamlined decision is not supported by the record. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d

1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error for a due process violation).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# C_2023258EN.01000501.xml

| 21.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/5

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.104933

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 258/04)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 15.6.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.104933 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TRTEL — Provisión de equipamiento activo e infraestructura auxiliar necesaria para la prestación de servicios 5G standalone en zonas rurales (MRR). |
| Legal basis | — | PROYECTO DE ORDEN ETD/XXX/2023 POR LA QUE SE ESTABLECEN LAS BASES REGULADORAS DE LA CONCESIÓN DE AYUDAS PARA LA PROVISIÓN DEL CONJUNTO DE EQUIPAMIENTO ACTIVO E INFRAESTRUCTURA AUXILIAR NECESARIA PARA LA PROVISIÓN DE SERVICIOS DE COMUNICACIONES MÓVILES CON TECNOLOGÍA 5G EN ZONAS DONDE NO EXISTE COBERTURA MÓVIL 4G CON SERVICIO MINIMO DE 50 MBPS Y SE PROCEDE A UNA PRIMERA CONVOCATORIA, EN EL MARCO DEL PLAN DE RECUPERACIÓN, TRANSFORMACIÓN Y RESILIENCIA — FINANCIADO POR LA UNIÓN EUROPEA — NEXTGENERATIONEU. PROGRAMA ‘UNICO 5G REDES ACTIVAS’ (Anexo I) — España Digital 2025 — España Digital 2026 — Estrategia de impulso de la tecnología 5G — Plan de Recuperación, transformación y resiliencia |

Date of adoption of the decision

15.6.2023

Aid number

SA.104933

Member State

Spain

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TRTEL — Provisión de equipamiento activo e infraestructura auxiliar necesaria para la prestación de servicios 5G standalone en zonas rurales (MRR).

Legal basis

—

PROYECTO DE ORDEN ETD/XXX/2023 POR LA QUE SE ESTABLECEN LAS BASES REGULADORAS DE LA CONCESIÓN DE AYUDAS PARA LA PROVISIÓN DEL CONJUNTO DE EQUIPAMIENTO ACTIVO E INFRAESTRUCTURA AUXILIAR NECESARIA PARA LA PROVISIÓN DE SERVICIOS DE COMUNICACIONES MÓVILES CON TECNOLOGÍA 5G EN ZONAS DONDE NO EXISTE COBERTURA MÓVIL 4G CON SERVICIO MINIMO DE 50 MBPS Y SE PROCEDE A UNA PRIMERA CONVOCATORIA, EN EL MARCO DEL PLAN DE RECUPERACIÓN, TRANSFORMACIÓN Y RESILIENCIA — FINANCIADO POR LA UNIÓN EUROPEA — NEXTGENERATIONEU. PROGRAMA ‘UNICO 5G REDES ACTIVAS’ (Anexo I) — España Digital 2025 — España Digital 2026 — Estrategia de impulso de la tecnología 5G — Plan de Recuperación, transformación y resiliencia

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Broadband infrastructures

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 680 000 000 EUR

Intensity

90,0  %

Duration

Until 31.12.2025

Economic sectors

Telecommunications

Name and address of the granting authority

| Secretaria de Estado de Telecomunicaciones e Infraestructuras Digitales. |
| --- |
| C/ Poeta Joan Maragall, 41 28071 MADRID |

Secretaria de Estado de Telecomunicaciones e Infraestructuras Digitales.

C/ Poeta Joan Maragall, 41 28071 MADRID

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
Cash Incentive Plan Covering Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10-hh 
  
 Written Description of 
 MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. Cash Incentive Plan 
 Covering Executive Officers 
  
 1. General 
  
 MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. (“MEMC” or the “Company”) maintains a
cash incentive plan that covers the Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s other executive officers. The plan is non-contractual. Under current practice, the Compensation and Nominating Committee (the “Committee”) makes annual
and/or semi-annual cash awards under the plan to executive officers to recognize and reward individual and corporate performance. For each participant, the Committee establishes target and maximum bonus levels that are defined as a percentage of the
participant’s base salary. The Company maintains the right to terminate or amend the cash incentive plan at any time. 
  
 2. Chief Executive Officer 
  
 For the Chief Executive Officer, the Committee establishes a number of performance objectives that may include Company financial performance, strategic objectives,
individual performance objectives and the achievement of the executive officers and management employees reporting to the Chief Executive Officer. These objectives are separately weighted and are generally determined and evaluated by the Committee
on an annual basis. Based on the achievement against these performance objectives, the Chief Executive Officer is entitled to receive a cash award on an annual basis. 
  
 3. Other Executive Officers 
  
 For the Company’s other executive officers, the Chief Executive Officer establishes a number of quarterly, semi-annual and/or annual
performance objectives that may include Company financial performance, along with a number of individual performance and financial objectives applicable to each executive officer’s functional area. These objectives are reviewed and approved by
the Committee on a quarterly, semi-annual or annual basis. These objectives are separately weighted and generally evaluated by the Committee on a quarterly or semi-annual basis. Based on the achievement against these performance objectives, the
executive officers are entitled to receive cash awards on a semi-annual or annual basis.
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML Systematic Momentum FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Paul Morton, ChiefExecutive Officer, President and Manager of Merrill Lynch AlternativeInvestments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:                                           | May 15, 2009 |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|-------------------|--------|
|                                            |              |   |
| By                                              | /s/Paul Morton    |   |
| Paul Morton                                     |
| Chief  Executive Officer, President and Manager |
| **(Principal Executive Officer)**               |

** **

----
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3079 

To take certain Federal land located in Tuolumne County, California, into 

trust for the benefit of the Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2015 

Mr. MCCLINTOCK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To take certain Federal land located in Tuolumne County, 

California, into trust for the benefit of the Tuolumne 

Band of Me-Wuk Indians, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAND INTO TRUST. 

4 (a) FEDERAL LAND.—Subject to valid existing 

5 rights, all right, title, and interest (including improve6 ments and appurtenances) of the United States in and to 

7 the Federal land described in subsection (b) shall be held 

8 in trust by the United States for the benefit of the 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3079 IH

1 Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians for nongaming pur2 poses. 

3 (b) LAND DESCRIPTION.—The land taken into trust 

4 under subsection (a) is the approximately 80 acres of Fed5 eral land under the administrative jurisdiction of the 

6 United States Forest Service, located in Tuolumne Coun7 ty, California, and described as follows: 

8 (1) Southwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of Section 

9 2, Township 1 North, Range 16 East. 

10 (2) Northeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4 of Section 

11 11, Township 1 North, Range 16 East. 

12 (c) GAMING.—Class II and class III gaming (as those 

13 terms are defined in section 4 of the Indian Gaming Regu14 latory Act (25 U.S.C. 2703)) shall not be permitted at 

15 any time on the land taken into trust under subsection 

16 (a). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001058630
<NAME> CSN CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                       538
<INVENTORY>                                     42,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,205
<PP&E>                                          44,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,699
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,683
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### LAWRENCE v. STATE.

No. 17827.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 15, 1936.

Rehearing Denied March 4, 1936.

*351E. E. Fuller, of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for four years.

It was charged in the indictment, in substance, that appellant, with malice aforethought, killed Mann Mimms by shooting him with a gun.

The homicide occurred on the 19th of June, 1933, at a negro celebration. According to the testimony of the state, appellant and George Syphret each shot deceased; appellant using a pistol, and Sy-phret a shotgun. The state’s testimony was to the effect that deceased was making no demonstration at the time he was shot and that he was unarmed. Appellant did not testify in his own behalf, but introduced witnesses who testified that deceased was attacking appellant at the time the fatal shots were fired.

• The evidence is deemed sufficient to support the conviction. No bills of exception are brought forward.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

On Motion for. Rehearing.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant seeks to bring before us by means of their affidavits the proposition that certain jurors who sat upon the trial of his case were influenced in the jury room by statements which they deemed to reflect upon appellant. This court cannot consider original ex parte affidavits made by witnesses or jurors and attached to a motion for rehearing such as here appears. The matters contained in said affidavits are now here attempted to be set up for the first time. Examination of the original motion for new trial in the court below makes plain the fact that no such matters were brought before the trial court. This court is in no sense a nisi prius court, and all matters such as those above referred to must be presented to the trial court in the first instance, failing in which they can only be presented to the chief executive, who has pardoning power.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; URGenT: Translational Efforts to Advance Gene-based Therapies for Ultra-Rare Neurological and Neuromuscular Disorders.                    

*Date:*                         October 17, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mirela Milescu, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, NSC, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852,                         *mirela.milescu@nih.gov,*                         301-496-5720.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: September 19, 2024.

David W. Freeman, 

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-21901 Filed 9-24-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# Official Journal C 11/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.011.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 11 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5414 January 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.011.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 11

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5414 January 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 011/01 | Communication from the Commission — Guidelines on the applicability of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to horizontal co-operation agreements (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 011/01

Communication from the Commission — Guidelines on the applicability of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to horizontal co-operation agreements (1)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 23


                                   EXHIBIT 23

                    AUDITOR'S CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULES




Board of Directors and
Stockholders
Photo Control Corporation



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Photo Control Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1998, of
our report, dated January 26, 1999, appearing in the Company's 1998 Annual
Report to Shareholders. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
such report in the registration statements on Form S-8 for the Photo Control
Stock Option Plan.

In the course of our audit of the financial statements referred to in our
report, dated January 26, 1999, included in the Company's 1998 Annual Report to
Shareholders, we also audited the supporting schedule listed in Item 14(a)(2) of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In our opinion, the schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.



January 26, 1999                       VIRCHOW KRAUSE, & COMPANY, LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota


                                       30
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Gurata Gold, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Feliberto Gurat,
President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of
Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and






(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.













/s/
Feliberto Gurat


Feliberto
Gurat


Chief
Executive Officer






April 11,
2008









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Gurata Gold, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Feliberto Gurat,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and






(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.













/s/
Feliberto Gurat


Feliberto
Gurat


Chief
Financial Officer






April 11,
2008