alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         808,169
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  508,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,322,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,840,744
<PP&E>                                       5,508,590
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,629,310
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,181,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          673,846
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       128,333
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,839,499
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,181,990
<SALES>                                     10,423,244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,423,244
<CGS>                                        8,175,528
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,175,528
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,590,107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              56,860
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,399,251)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (140,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,259,251)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of New York Residential, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Kornstein, Acting Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
August 19, 2009By:
/s/ Robert KornsteinName:
Robert KornsteinTitle:
Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-31244 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARTHUR WILLIAMS, also known as Pop, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 93-CR-10012-6

-------------------- June 18, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Arthur Williams, federal prisoner # 08395-035, appeals the dismissal of his postconviction motion to dismiss the indictment filed pursuant to F ED . R. C RIM . P. 12(b)(2). Motions to dismiss an indictment filed pursuant to F ED . R. C RIM . P. 12(b)(2) must be made before trial or they are waived. United States v. Cathey , 591 F.2d 268, 271 n.1 (5th Cir. 1979). Because the criminal proceedings were no longer pending, Williams’ motion to dismiss the indictment was unauthorized and without a jurisdictionalNo. 01-31244 -2- basis. See United States v. Early , 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### FRATERNAL BANK & TRUST CO. v. COTTON BELT STATE BANK OF TIMPSON.

No. 13206.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

June 28, 1935.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 6, 1935.

Mike E. Smith, John O. Ragan, E. H. Ratcliff, and A. W. Christian, all of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Cecil A. Morgan, of Fort Worth, and Sanders & McLeroy, of Center, for ap-pellee.

LATTIMORE, Justice.

The controverting affidavit was filed November 28, 1931. The hearing was twice *784set and postponed, the second date being February 4, 1932. Nothing further of record concerning same is shown until August 4, 1934, when a supplemental controverting affidavit was filed and the order appealed from was made.

Appellee objected to any hearing on the merits of the controverting plea, and insisted that the delay was fatal to the rights of plaintiff to maintain venue in Tarrant county, and moved the court to transfer the cause in accordance with the plea of privilege.

This was one of six cases filed involving a cause of action on six checks cashed pursuant to an alleged swindling scheme to collect money from a death benefit fund of the negro Masonic fraternity. Substantially the same venue question was involved in each case, and the first was tried, appealed, and finally disposed of on April 4, 1934.

While the delay of two years is unusually long, it seems that no one objected to the delay until appellant asked for a hearing in 1934. We quite'agree with the principles announced in American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Jones Transfer & Storage Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 46 S.W.(2d) 1054, and Malone v. Barton (Tex. Civ. App.) 62 S.W.(2d) 613, supporting the requirement of diligence; none the less, we must give a common-sense application of the statute to the facts. Apparently, all parties were .content that the trial of •this case await the final decision in the appealed case on the debatable law questions pertaining to venue which were raised therein and applied equally to all the others. The decision of the trial court to hear the evidence on venue suggests that he considered the delay, awaiting the determination of the appeal of Guaranty Bond State Bank v. Fraternal Bank & Trust Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 68 S.W.(2d) 305, justifiable, since there are no findings of fact expressed, and since the evidence under the controverting affidavit need not be heard unless the controverting plea had- not been waived.

However, after that case had been finally determined and thereafter four months, more than the time of a full term of court, had elapsed, and far beyond the sixty days prescribed by article 2092, subd. 14, R. S., for the determination of the venue issue, no excuse is offered for this delay after April 4, 1934.

It was not within the province of the trial court to resolve a disputed fact issue as to the merits only of the case raised by the evidence on the hearing of the plea of privilege. Alexander v. Duncan (Tex. Civ. App.) 54 S.W.(2d) 1050. The prima facie case made by appellant of a cause of action could not be rejected by the trial judge.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
# C_2022405EN.01006301.xml

| 21.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 405/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 405/63

---

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decisions (CFSP) 2022/1986, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1985 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2022/C 405/07)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1986 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1985 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons, entities and bodies should be included on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for the designation of those persons, entities and bodies appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons, entities and bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address before 2 November 2022:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 272 I, 20.10.2022, p. 5.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(4)  OJ L 272 I, 20.10.2022, p. 1.

---
# Official Journal C 285/16 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 285 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6416 July 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 285

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6416 July 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 285/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 285/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 23.2














Consent of Independent Auditors





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:





(1) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-222187) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(2) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-222189) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(3) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-169488, as amended) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(4) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-144607) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(5) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-144606) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(6) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-121962, as amended) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(7) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-110926) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(8) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-109849) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(9) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-109848) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(10) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-97337) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(11) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-36626) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(12) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-74693) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(13) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-74695) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(14) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-70157, as amended) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(15) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-48917, as amended) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(16) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-183480) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(17) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-169487) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(18) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-148237) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(19) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-103116) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(20) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-97677) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(21) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-69877) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(22) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-59767) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;


(23) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-59771) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust; and,


(24) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-59773) of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust;





of our report dated February 13, 2017, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Lehigh  Valley Associates and Subsidiary, included in this Form 10-K/A of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust for the year ended December 31, 2017.





/s/ Ernst & Young LLP








Indianapolis, Indiana


March 27, 2018
#### TRAVELERS INS. CO. v. MALDONADO.

No. 8128.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

Nov. 27, 1935.

Coleman Gay, of Austin, and Temple-ton, Brooks, Napier & Brown, of San Antonio, for appellant.

G. A. Martins and Polk Shelton, both of Austin, for appellee.

McClendon, chief justice.

Suit by Maldonado against the insurance company, insurance carrier for Kuntz-Sternenberg Lumber Company, to set aside an award of the Industrial Accident Board awarding Maldonado $63.19 as total compensation for injuries received while employed by the lumber company. In a trial to a jury upon special issues, the judgment was for Maldonado for $2,631.34. The insurance company has appealed.

The sixth special issue (answered “No”) reads: “Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that the incapacity (if any) to labor in pursuance of a gainful occupation suffered by plaintiff as a result of the accidental injuries complained of by him in his Petition had terminated (ended) on or prior to April 30, 1933?”

The seventh special issue (answered “No”) reads: “Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that the incapacity (if any) of plaintiff to labor in pursuance of a gainful occupation on and after April 30, 1933, complained of by him in his Petition, is the result of syphilis, as alleged in defendant’s Answer?”

Objection was made to each of these issues upon the ground that it “imposes a greater burden of proof upon the defendant than the law required.” The objection was well taken in each instance. The burden was on plaintiff to establish by a preponderance of evidence that his disability had not terminated and that it was due to injuries received in the course of his employment, and not to syphilis or other cause. Upon both of these issues, *301the evidence was sharply conflicting, and to place the burden of establishment upon the affirmative by a preponderance of evidence constituted reversible error. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. McCurry (Tex.Com.App.) 41 S.W.(2d) 215, 78 A.L.R. 760.

Such error was a positive affirmative one and did not consist merely in an omission. It was therefore not incumbent upon appellant to present correct charges upon these issues. Hines v. Kelley (Tex.Com.App.) 252 S.W. 1033.

Other matters complained of are either without merit or may not arise upon another trial, and we think it unnecessary to discuss them further than to say that we do not think the evidence presented was sufficient to sustain a lump sum judgment.

The trial court’s judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
From: "Moore, Chris N." <Chris.Moore@alcoa.com>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Palazzolo, Michael A." <Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com>

Date: 01/14/2011 10:12 AM

Subject: Alcoa Inc.

- Tennessee Operations Primary MACT Data Request

R ochelle

-

Good morning! Per your request via Mike Palazzolo, here are the revised

files for Alcoa Inc.

- Tennessee Operations. Please let me know if you

or others have questions regarding the files. I will be glad to help

with any additional revisions or provide other information as necessary.

Thanks!

Chris

Chris Moore

Alcoa Inc.

- Tennessee Operations

(865) 977

- 2403

<<ReleasePoint_NEI10933_Jan 2011.xls>> <<CategoryHAPs_NEI10933_Jan

2011.xls>> <<Alcoa South Plant_Dec 2010.kmz>>
#### J. P. JANUARY v. STATE.

No. 15557.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 19, 1932.

Earl M. Greer, of Wills Point, for appellant.

■Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, P. j.

The unlawful possession of a still for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor is the offense ; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The record is before this court without statement of facts and bills of exception. The proceedings.appear regular.

The judgment is- affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of SUBMICRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  August 10, 2010





/s/ Charles Stidham





Name: Charles Stidham


Title:  Chief Executive Officer











Dated:  August 10, 2010





/s/ Charles Stidham





Name: Charles Stidham


Title:  Chief Financial Officer
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S

O F T E X A S

NOS. WR-88, 438-03 & WR-88, 438-05

EX P ART E WENDE LL WARD, Appl icant

ON AP P LI CAT I ONS F OR WRI TS O F HAB EA S CORP US

CAUSE NO. NOS. W0471691A & W0471691C IN THE 195 DI STRI CT COURT T H

F ROM DAL LA S COUNT Y

P er cur iam

.

O P I N I O N

A ppl i can t pl eade d gui l

t y t o i n j ury t o a ch i l d an d was s en t en ced t o f

i f t een y ears ’ i

m pri s o n m en t

.

A ppl i can t f i l ed t h es e appl i cat i o n s f

o r a wri t o f h ab eas co rpus i n t h e co un

t y o f co n v i c t i o n

, an d t h e

di s t ri ct cl erk f

o rwarded i

t t o t h i s Co urt

. See T E X

. C O D E C R I M

. P R O C

. art

. 11. 07. T h e t ri al co urt

co n s t rued t h e sec o n d wri t appl i cat i o n as a suppl em en t t o t h e i n i t i al wri t appl i cat i o n

.

A ppl i can t rai s es cl ai

m s ch al l en gi

n g t h e v al i di

t y o f h i s co n

v i ct i o n an d h i s s en

t en ce. He al l eges

h e i s s erv i n g a s en t en ce t h at do es n o t f

al l wi t h i n t h e appl i cab l e ran ge o f pun i s h m en t

. Ba s ed o n t h e

reco rd, t h e t ri al co ur t ha s det erm i n ed t h at A

ppl i can t i s s erv i n g an i l l egal s en

t en ce. T h e t ri al co urt

reco m m en ds den

y i n g rel i ef o n t h e cl ai

m s ch al l en gi

n g t h e v al i di

t y o f t h e co n

v i ct i o n

. W e agree wi

t h

t h e t ri al co urt ’ s f

i n di n gs

. A ppl i can t ’ s cl ai m s rel at i n g t o t h e v al i di

t y o f h i s co n

v i ct i o n are den i ed.2

W i t h respe ct t o A

ppl i can t ’ s pun i s h m en t

, rel i ef i s gran

t ed

. E x par te P ue

, 552 S. W

. 3d 226, 228

(T ex

. Cri m

. A pp. 2018); E

x par te P ar r ott

, 396 S. W

. 3d 531

, 534 (T ex

. Cri m

. A pp. 2013). T h e

s en t en ce i n caus e n um b er F -04- 71691-N i

n t h e 195 Di s t ri ct Co urt o f Dal l as Co un t y i s s et as i de, an d th

A ppl i can t i s rem an ded t o t h e cus t o dy o f t h e Sh eri f f o f Dal l as Co un

t y f o r n ew pun i s h

m en t

pro cee di n gs

. T h e t ri al co urt s h al l i s s ue an y n ece s s ary b en ch warran t wi t h i n t en day s f

ro m t h e dat e

o f t h i s Co urt ’ s m an dat e.

Co pi es o f t h i s o pi

n i o n s h al l b e s en

t t o t h e T ex as Depa

rt m en t o f Cri m i n al J us t i ce–C o rr ect i o n al

In s t i t ut i o n s Di v i s i o n an d t h e Bo ard o f Pardo n s an d Paro l es

.

Del i v ered: F eb ruar y 24, 2021

Do n o t pub l i s h
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,826,152
<SECURITIES>                                    10,844,382
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,994,379
<ALLOWANCES>                                       550,000
<INVENTORY>                                     26,678,203
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,923,473
<PP&E>                                         119,289,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,392,774
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,992,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,512,152
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            89,590
<OTHER-SE>                                     128,828,906
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,992,451
<SALES>                                        167,701,593
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               168,939,272
<CGS>                                          115,373,492
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  146,011,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,054
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,925,764
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,425,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,500,764
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,500,764
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.67



</TABLE>