alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ALEY v. STATE.

No. 18969.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 12, 1937.

H. W. Carothers and Durell Carothers, both of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, death.

It was charged in the indictment, in substance, that appellant, with malice aforethought, killed Bogie Chatham by shooting him with a gun.

Deceased, who was in the business of raising- watermelons, had employed appellant to work for him, and, according to the testimony of the state, he had discharged appellant shortly prior to the homicide. Further, the State’s testimony was to the effect that on the 31st of July, 1936, appellant came to the place where deceased was loading a truck with watermelons, and, exhibiting a pistol, said to deceased: “Give me the money; give me the money.” In reply, deceased stated to appellant that he would give him the money when he reached home. One of the witnesses for the State testified that he attempted to approach appellant, but that appellant directed the pistol toward him and ordered him back. Appellant then reiterated his demand that deceased give him the money, and at the same time shot deceased. After being mortally wounded deceased delivered to the appellant approximately $80.

Testifying in his own behalf, appellant admitted that he killed deceased. It was his version that deceased owed him money for work he had done and had refused to pay him; that on the occasion of the homicide he asked deceased to pay him what he owed him; that one Russell and deceased came toward him as if to attack him; that Russell had a knife in his hand; that he (appellant) told deceased to stop; that he shot deceased to keep him from attacking him; that deceased then delivered the money to him.

We are unable to agree with appellant’s contention that the jury were not warranted in assessing the extreme penalty.

Appellant sought a new trial on the ground that one of his witnesses had been absent from court and that he had been deprived of his testimony. According to the affidavit of the witness, he would have testified, in substance, that deceased owed appellant some money. Appellant does not contend that the testimony in question was newly discovered. Prior to the trial he was aware that the witness would testify as alleged. He made no application for a continuance. Under the circumstances, error is not presented.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
# Official Journal L 157/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.157.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 157 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 568 June 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.157.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 157

English edition

Legislation

Volume 568 June 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2013 of 3 April 2013 on applications for authorisation of genetically modified food and feed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Regulations (EC) No 641/2004 and (EC) No 1981/2006 (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2013 of 3 April 2013 on applications for authorisation of genetically modified food and feed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Regulations (EC) No 641/2004 and (EC) No 1981/2006 (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 99(c)



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549





FORM 11-K





|[X] | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|    | EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934                                     

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002

OR

|[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|    | EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934                                         



Commission file number 2-82760



|A. | Full title of the plan and address of the plan, if different from that of the issuer
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   | named below:                                                                        

Peoples Energy Corporation
Employee Stock Purchase Plan



|B. | Name of issuer of the securities held pursuant to the plan and the address of its
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   | principal executive office:                                                      

Peoples Energy Corporation
130 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601







This Form 11-K is being filed for informational purposes only.



|ITEM 1. | An audited statement of financial condition as of the end of the latest two
|------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|        | fiscal years of the plan.                                                  

Not applicable. Employees' payments for Company stock are neither segregated nor held for investment.

|ITEM 2. | An audited statement of income and changes in plan equity for each of the
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|        | latest three fiscal years of the plan.                                   
|        |                                                                          
|        | Not applicable. See above.                                               







SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Peoples Energy Corporation has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



|                        |  | Peoples Energy Corporation           
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                        |  | Employee Stock Purchase Plan         
|                        |  | (Name of Plan)                       
|                        |  |                                      
|                        |  |                                      
|Date: December 13, 2002 |  | By: /s/  Thomas A. Nardi             
|                        |  | (Signature)                          
|                        |  | Thomas A. Nardi                      
|                        |  | Senior Vice President,               
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                        |  | Peoples Energy Corporation
#### CLAY v. STATE.

No. 16097.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 14, 1933.

Z. J. Spruiell, Jr., and Oran Lowry, both of Tyler, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for transporting intoxicating liquor’; punishment assessed being one year in the penitentiary.

The indictment is regular. No statement of facts or bills of exception are brought forward. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549








FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of


the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 27, 2016








First Commonwealth Financial Corporation


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)











Pennsylvania001-1113825-1428528(State or other jurisdictionof incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS EmployerIdentification No.)601 Philadelphia Street, Indiana, PA15701(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (724) 349-7220


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


 ̈Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


 ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


 ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---







Item 2.02Results of Operations and Financial Condition


On July 27, 2016 , First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing financial results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 .  A copy of this press release and the related earnings tables are furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this report and incorporated herein by reference.





Item 7.01Regulation FD Disclosure


On July 27, 2016 , the Company announced a cash dividend of $0.07 per share of the Company’s common stock.  The dividend declaration is included in the press release announcing financial results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 .  A copy of this press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this report and incorporated herein by reference.





Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits


Exhibits


99.1Press Release announcing Second Quarter 2016 Financial Results and Declaration of Quarterly Dividend.








---







SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


Dated: July 27, 2016





FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATIONBy:/s/ James R. ReskeName:James R. ReskeTitle:Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CAFETERIA OPERATORS, L.P. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED APRIL 1, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-1997
<CASH>                                           1,398
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,202
<ALLOWANCES>                                        22
<INVENTORY>                                      5,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,286
<PP&E>                                         120,608
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,468
<BONDS>                                         66,401
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (25,511)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,378
<SALES>                                         47,353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,353
<CGS>                                           14,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,498
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  56
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,544)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,544)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,544)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21

PARENT AND SUBSIDIARIES
  (Included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and Wholly-owned)

National Presto Industries, Inc.
Eau Claire, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)

          Its Subsidiaries:
                    National Holding Investment Company
                    Wilmington, Delaware (A Delaware Corporation)

                          Its Subsidiaries:
                                Presto Manufacturing Company
                                Jackson, Mississippi (A Mississippi
                                Corporation)

                                Its Division:
                                           Presto Products Manufacturing Company
                                           Alamogordo, New Mexico

                                Century Leasing and Liquidating, Inc.
                                Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota Corporation)

                                Its Subsidiary:
                                          Presto Export, Inc. (Inactive)
                                          Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota
                                          Corporation)

                          Jackson Sales and Storage Company
                          Jackson, Mississippi (A Mississippi Corporation)

                          Canton Sales & Storage Company
                          Canton, Mississippi (A Mississippi Corporation)

                          Presto Export, Ltd.
                          Christiansted, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands (A
                          Virgin Islands Corporation)

                    National Defense Corporation
                    Eau Claire, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)

                    NPI Export Corporation (Inactive)
                    Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota Corporation)
Exhibit 32.2








Chief Financial Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Stephen J. Gilhooly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Date:          August 7, 2009

/s/ Stephen J. GilhoolyStephen J. Gilhooly
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to TIB Financial Corp. and will be retained by TIB Financial
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



### No. 97-40347

SALOME RAMIRO VERA,



### Plaintiff - Counter Defendant - Appellant,

versus

JOHN S. RUGGLES,



### Defendant - Counter Claimant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(C-95-CV-293)

December 5, 1997

Before POLITZ, 

### Chief Judge, GARWOOD and BARKSDALE, 

### Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *



### This action, filed in state court, was removed to federal court, ostensibly

because a federal cause of action was alleged in an amended complaint. The trial1 See Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp.

, 486 U.S. 800, 108 S.Ct. 2166, 100

L.Ed.2d 811 (1988); Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. V. Thompson

, 478 U.S. 804, 106

S.Ct. 3229, 92 L.Ed.2d 650 (1986); Willy v. Coastal Corp.

, 855 F.2d 1160, 1168-1171 (5th

Cir. 1988).

2 

### court thereafter denied a motion to remand and granted a Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)

and dismissed the action. Complainant timely appealed.

Having considered the briefs, oral arguments of counsel, and pertinent parts

of the record, and concluding that there is no federal jurisdiction herein, 1 

### the

judgment appealed must be vacated and this matter is remanded to the district court

for a prompt return to state court.

VACATED and REMANDED.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1723/2005

of 20 October 2005         

fixing the rates of the refunds applicable to certain cereal and rice products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (2), and in particular Article 14(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of the refunds applicable to the basic products listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1043/2005 and in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 or in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003, and exported in the form of goods listed in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 or in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 respectively, shall be fixed as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 October 2005.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96.

(3)OJ L 172, 5.7.2005, p. 24.

(4)OJ L 275, 29.9.1987, p. 36.

(5)OJ L 159, 1.7.1993, p. 112. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1584/2004 (OJ L 280, 31.8.2004, p. 11).

----

ANNEX

Rates of the refunds applicable from 21 October 2005 to certain cereals and rice products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty (*1)

----

(*1)  The rates set out in this Annex are not applicable to exports to Bulgaria, with effect from 1 October 2004 and to the goods listed in Tables I and II to Protocol No 2 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 exported to the Swiss Confederation or to the Principality of Liechtenstein with effect from 1 February 2005.

(1)  As far as agricultural products obtained from the processing of a basic product or/and assimilated products are concerned, the coefficients set out in Annex V to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1043/2005 is applicable.

(2)  The goods concerned fall under CN code 3505 10 50.

(3)  Goods listed in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 or referred to in Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 2825/93 (OJ L 258, 16.10.1993, p. 6).

(4)  For syrups of CN codes NC 1702 30 99, 1702 40 90 and 1702 60 90, obtained from mixing glucose and fructose syrup, the export refund relates only to the glucose syrup.

----
*OPINION ISSUED SEPTEMBER 25, 2008*

#### Heather C. Montgomery

(CV-07-153-Z)

Claimant appeared in person.

Ronald R. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of West Virginia.

ORDER

HACKNEY, JUDGE:

An application of the claimant, Heather C. Montgomery, for an award under the West Virginia Crime Victims Compensation Act, was filed March 22,2007. The report of the Claim Investigator, filed September 18, 2007, recommended that an award of $7,165.00 be granted, to which the claimant filed a response in agreement. An Order was issued on October 25, 2007, granting an award of $3,165.00, in response to which the claimant’s request for hearing was filed November 16, 2007. This matter came on for hearing September 19, 2008, claimant appearing *pro se*and the State of West Virginia by counsel, Ronald R. Brown, Assistant Attorney General.

From September 2006 - January 2007, the claimant’s rental property in Jane Lew, Lewis County, was damaged by the operation of a methamphetamine laboratory. Unbeknownst to the claimant, offender Russell Foster was engaged in that illegal activity in the claimant’s apartment above her place of business. As a result, the claimant began suffering health problems from exposure to the chemicals, causing her to miss work. The claimant also incurred expenses for cleanup of the property.

In its initial award, this Court granted reimbursement for the claimant’s medical, prescription, mileage, and work losses totaling $2,165.00, plus $1,000.00 for *general*crime scene cleanup, for atotal of$3,165.00. In not approving the Claim Investigator’s recommended award of $5,000.00 for cleanup of a methamphetamine laboratory under *352W.Va. Code § 14-2A-3(f)(3)(A), the Court found that the claimant did not hire a certified, licensed, and bonded business to perform the work, as required by the Court’s guidelines.

At the hearing, it was revealed that the federal Drug Enforcement Administration, which is in charge of removing hazardous materials, was responsible for hiring a company called McCutcheon Enterprises Inc. to perform the work. Their disposal site was in Ohio. It was established that McCutcheon was in fact a duly certified and licensed company engaged in the removal of hazardous materials.

Also of concern to the Court was the issue of residue. The claimant testified that a “Drager Pump” was used in a post-cleanup evaluation of the area, and that the residue was determined not to be hazardous.

From the evidence adduced at the hearing, it is clear to the Court that the claimant at all times acted in good faith, that a certified and licensed company removed the hazardous materials, and that a post-test was performed which was sufficient to prove that no dangerous residue was present. Accordingly, the additional award of $4,000.00 for the cleanup of her property is hereby granted as set out below.

Heather C. Montgomery

589 Ridgeview Hill Dr.

Jane Lew WV 26378.$4,000.00