alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23-1

                 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                         ON SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE


To Pennsylvania Enterprises, Inc.:

         We have audited  in  accordance  with  generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated  financial  statements included in Pennsylvania
Enterprises, Inc.'s  1996  Annual  Report  to  Shareholders incorporated by
reference in this  Form  10-K,  and  have  issued  our report thereon dated
February 19, 1997.   Our  audit  was  made  for  the  purpose of forming an
opinion on  those  consolidated  financial  statements  taken  as  a whole.
Supplemental Schedule II, Valuation and  Qualifying Accounts for the three-
year period ended December 31, 1996  (see index of financial statements) is
presented for  purposes  of  complying  with  the  Securities  and Exchange
Commissions rules and  is  not  part  of  the  basic consolidated financial
statements.  This schedule  has  been  subjected to the auditing procedures
applied in the audit of the basic consolidated financial statements and, in
our opinion, fairly  states  in  all  material  respects the financial data
required to be set  forth  therein  in  relation  to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole.



                                                  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP      





New York, N.Y.
February 19, 1997
<PAGE>
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2.10




September 30, 2017 


CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc.
1100 Walnut Street, Suite 3350
Kansas City, Missouri  64106
Re:    Incentive Fee Under Management Agreement for CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Reference is made to that certain Management Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2015 and effective as of May 1, 2015, by and between CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and Corridor InfraTrust Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Manager”) (as such agreement has been, and may be further, amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Management Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used and not defined herein are used as defined in the Management Agreement.  The Company and the Manager have entered into this Letter Agreement to waive a portion of the Incentive Fee set forth in Section 8(b) of the Management Agreement applicable to the dividend paid during the calendar quarter ending September 30, 2017.  This letter in no way supersedes our May 9, 2016 letter agreement (effective March 31, 2016) concerning the Management Fee calculation.
This letter documents that the Manager has recommended, and the Company has agreed, that the Manager shall only be paid an Incentive Fee of $136,927 as a result of the dividend paid during the Company’s September 30, 2017 calendar quarter.  This agreed upon incentive fee payment constitutes a waiver by the Manager of $11,858 of the Incentive Fee that would otherwise be due to the Manager from the Company.
The foregoing waiver shall not apply to any prior or future periods, although the Manager reserves the right to waive in the future any Incentive Fee payment to which it may be entitled for one or more future fiscal quarters of the Company.
The Company and the Manager mutually acknowledge and agree that this modification to the Incentive Fee payment right represents a discretionary action on the part of the Manager that is not required under the terms of the Management Agreement and that, except as specifically set forth herein, and as modified in our prior May 9, 2016 letter agreement concerning the Management Fee calculation, all provisions of the Management Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be affected by this letter.






Exhibit 10.2.10



	
				
	 
	 
	Very truly yours,

	 
	 
	CORRIDOR INFRATRUST MANAGEMENT, LLC

	 
	 
	By:  /s/ Richard C. Green, Jr.                                 

	 
	 
	Name:  Richard C. Green, Jr., Managing Director

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Agreed and accepted:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	CORENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE TRUST, INC.
	 

	By:  /s/ David J. Schulte                                          
	 
	 

	Name:  David J. Schulte, President
# Official Journal C 81/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.081.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 81 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5329 March 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.081.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 81

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5329 March 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2010/C 081/01 | Procès-verbal of rectification to the Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon on 13 December 2007(OJ C 306, 17.12.2007) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2010/C 081/01

Procès-verbal of rectification to the Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon on 13 December 2007(OJ C 306, 17.12.2007)

(OJ C 306, 17.12.2007)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RAFAEL TRINIDAD, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D22-1168

LT Case No. 2011-CF-002911-A-O

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed October 18, 2022

3.853 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Orange County, 

Patricia Strowbridge, Judge.

Rafael Trinidad, Crawfordville, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SASSO, NARDELLA and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.
Amendment No. 2 to Compensation Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.41 
  
 BOYD GAMING CORPORATION 
 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 
  
 Amendment Number 2 to Amended and Restated Plan 
  
 WHEREAS, Boyd Gaming Corporation (“Employer”) maintains the Boyd Gaming Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for the Board of Directors and Key Employees (“Plan”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Employer has reserved to itself the right to amend the Plan at
any time it deems necessary or desirable; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the
Employer desires to amend the Plan to liberalize certain of the requirements relating to deferral elections made by newly-hired employees who desire to become Plan participants. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2003, as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 3.2 of the Plan is restated in its entirety to read as follows: 

  
 “3.2 An Eligible Employee may enroll and become a Participant by executing an Enrollment Agreement in each calendar year preceding the calendar year
in which deferral of compensation is to commence. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a newly-hired Eligible Employee who is otherwise eligible to participate in the Plan shall be permitted to complete an initial Enrollment Agreement within thirty (30)
days after his date of hire; provided, however, that any such initial Enrollment Agreement shall only be effective with respect to Compensation earned after the thirtieth (30th) day following his date of hire.” 
  
 Except as otherwise provided in this Amendment Number 2 to the Amended and Restated Plan, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.

  
 EXECUTED this 20th day of November, 2003. 
  

			
	BOYD GAMING CORPORATION, a Nevada Corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/    DONALD D. SNYDER


	Name:	 	Donald D. Snyder
	Its:	 	President
# L_2011093EN.01S00301.xml

| 7.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 93/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 93/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

| Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 4/2011 will be published at a later date. |
| --- |

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 4/2011 will be published at a later date.

---
#### HOLLIDAY v. STATE.

No. 15074.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 17, 1932.

David O’Fiel, of Beaumont, and R. G. Allen, of Goose Creek, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CALHOUN, J.

The offense, theft of chickens; the punishment, *one year*in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of thé Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3077 

To require any amounts remaining in Members’ Representational Allowances 

at the end of a fiscal year to be deposited in the Treasury and used 

for deficit reduction or to reduce the Federal debt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2015 

Mr. KIND (for himself, Mr. RIBBLE, Mr. TIBERI, and Ms. DUCKWORTH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

House Administration 

A BILL 

To require any amounts remaining in Members’ Representational Allowances at the end of a fiscal year to be deposited in the Treasury and used for deficit reduction or 

to reduce the Federal debt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Giveback Deficit Re5 duction Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3077 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRING AMOUNTS REMAINING IN MEMBERS’ 

2 REPRESENTATIONAL ALLOWANCES TO BE 

3 USED FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION OR TO RE4 DUCE THE FEDERAL DEBT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, any amounts appropriated for Members’ Rep7 resentational Allowances for the House of Representatives 

8 for a fiscal year which remain after all payments are made 

9 under such Allowances for the year shall be deposited in 

10 the Treasury and used for deficit reduction, except that 

11 in the case of a fiscal year for which there is no Federal 

12 budget deficit, such amounts shall be used to reduce the 

13 Federal debt (in such manner as the Secretary of the 

14 Treasury considers appropriate). 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply with 

16 respect to fiscal year 2015 and each succeeding fiscal year. 

17 SEC. 3. REGULATIONS. 

18 The Committee on House Administration of the 

19 House of Representatives shall have authority to prescribe 

20 regulations to carry out this Act. 

21 SEC. 4. DEFINITION. 

22 As used in this Act, the term ‘‘Member of the House 

23 of Representatives’’ means a Representative in, or a Dele24 gate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
POTLATCH CORPORATION

                             Subsidiaries

     The following subsidiaries are included in the company's consolidated
financial statements.

                                        State in Which     Percentage of
                                            Voting          Securities
            Name                           Organized           Owned

Duluth & Northeastern Railroad Co.         Minnesota            100
Cloquet, Minn. 

Prescott & Northwestern Railroad Co.       Arkansas             100
Prescott, Ark.

St. Maries River Railroad Co.              Idaho                100
Lewiston, Idaho

Warren & Saline River Railroad Co.         Arkansas             100
Warren, Ark.

All unnamed subsidiaries, when considered in the aggregate as a single
subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.  No separate
financial statements are filed for any subsidiary.

                                                       Exhibit (22)
March 24, 2000

First Merchants Corporation
200 East Jackson Street
Muncie, Indiana  47305

Gentlemen:

     You have requested our opinion in connection with the proposed public
offering by First Merchants Corporation, an Indiana corporation (the "Company"),
of up to 1,346,118 shares of common stock ("Shares") covered by a Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (the "Registration Statement") filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about March 24, 2000.

     In connection with your request to us, we have been provided with the
following:

     1.   The Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Company;

     2.   The minute book of the Company; and

     3.   A Certificate from the Indiana Secretary of State certifying that the
          Company is a corporation duly organized and existing under and by
          virtue of the laws of the State of Indiana.

     For purpose of this opinion, we have examined the above documents and have
relied upon them as to matters of fact. We have not independently checked to
verify the accuracy or completeness of the information set forth or certified in
such documents.

     Based solely upon the foregoing documents and examination, and subject to
the foregoing limitations and qualifications, we are of the opinion that:

     1.   As of this date, the Company is a duly organized and existing
          corporation under the laws of the State of Indiana with the corporate
          power and authority to conduct its business as described in the
          Registration Statement; and

     2.   The Shares, when issued as contemplated by the Registration Statement
          in exchange for payment therefor, will be validly issued, fully paid
          and non-assessable.

     We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement and to the reference made to us in the Registration Statement and
Proxy Statement-Prospectus forming a part thereof under the caption "Legal
Opinions." By giving this consent, we do not admit that we come within the
category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission thereunder.

                                        Very truly yours,



                                        BINGHAM SUMMERS WELSH & SPILMAN, LLP

                                     Ex. 5-1
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 315 

To require the Secretary of Defense to establish a process to determine 

whether individuals claiming certain service in the Philippines during 

World War II are eligible for certain benefits despite not being on 

the Missouri List, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2015 

Ms. MENG (for herself, Mr. HONDA, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. RANGEL, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. TAKANO, and Mr. PETERS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for 

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to establish a process 

to determine whether individuals claiming certain service 

in the Philippines during World War II are eligible for 

certain benefits despite not being on the Missouri List, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Filipino Veterans 

5 Promise Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 315 IH

1 SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF CERTAIN SERVICE IN PHIL2 IPPINES DURING WORLD WAR II. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, in con4 sultation with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and such 

5 military historians as the Secretary of Defense considers 

6 appropriate, shall establish a process to determine whether 

7 a covered individual served as described in subsection (a) 

8 or (b) of section 107 of title 38, United States Code, for 

9 purposes of determining whether such covered individual 

10 is eligible for benefits described in such subsections. 

11 (b) COVERED INDIVIDUALS.—For purposes of this 

12 section, a covered individual is any individual who— 

13 (1) claims service described in subsection (a) or 

14 (b) of section 107 of title 38, United States Code; 

15 and 

16 (2) is not included in the Approved Revised Re17 constructed Guerilla Roster of 1948, known as the 

18 ‘‘Missouri List’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

       In connection with the accompanying
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Illusion Digital
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending
June 30, 2008, I, AL Kennedy, President of the
Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

       1. 	Such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30,
2008, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2. 	The information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ending June 30, 2008, fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 18, 2008

/s/ AL Kennedy
AL Kennedy
President
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31.3





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, James H. Dennedy, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Agilysys, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





Dated: July 29, 2013








By:/s/James H. DennedyJames H. DennedyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit (99)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Annual Report of Owens Corning (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Michael H. Thaman, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Michael H. ThamanChief
Financial Officer

March 28, 2003

This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Owens Corning and will be retained by Owens Corning and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Prime
Hospitality Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, A.F. Petrocelli, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act

of 1934; and


The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition


and results of operations of the
Company.


| |  |                                                                    
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ A.F. PETROCELLI
    A.F. Petrocelli
    Chief Executive Officer

March 12, 2004
Exhibit 18

Polaroid Corporation
Cambridge, Massachusetts

March 17, 1998

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Polaroid Corporation and
subsidiary companies as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, cash flows and changes in common
stockholders' equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1997, and have reported thereon under date of January 27, 1998. The
aforementioned consolidated financial statements and our audit report thereon
are incorporated by reference in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1997. As stated in Note 1 to those financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for depreciation and
states that the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the
circumstances because the Company believes that the straight-line method more
appropriately measures the timing of the economic benefits to be received from
these assets. Also, since the straight-line method is the predominant method
used in the industry in which the Company operates, the adoption increases the
comparability of the Company's results with those of its competitors. In
accordance with your request, we have reviewed and discussed with Company
officials the circumstances and business judgment and planning upon which the
decision to make this change in the method of accounting was based.

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change, authoritative criteria have
not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method
of accounting over another acceptable method. However, for purposes of Polaroid
Corporation's compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, we are furnishing this letter.

Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on management's business
judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is
preferable in the Company's circumstances.

Very truly yours,

KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP