alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS-11-060-E 

Feb 02 2011 

 Exemption No. 9825A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-9096 

Mr. Paul W. Railsback 

Director of Operations 

Air Transport Association of America, Inc. 

1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 1100 

Washington, DC 20004-1707 

Dear Mr. Railsback: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 4317, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. Please 

note that your exemption number has changed. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated November 24, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of Air Transport Association of America, Inc. (ATA) for an extension of 

Exemption No. 4317, as amended. That exemption from § 121.485(b) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) permits ATA-member airlines and other similarly situated 

part 121 air carriers to conduct flights of less than 12 hours duration with an airplane having a 

flightcrew of three or more pilots and an additional flight crewmember without requiring the 

rest period following that flight to be twice the hours flown since the last rest period at each 

flightcrew’s home base. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 
 2

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to ATA-member 

airlines and other similarly situated part 121 air carriers. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9825 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9825 to April 30, 2013 unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9825 remain the same. This letter must be 

attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9825. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3079 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 549
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3079

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 6, 2016

                                Received

                              July 7, 2016

                 Read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To take certain Federal land located in Tuolumne County, California, 
into trust for the benefit of the Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND INTO TRUST.

    (a) Federal Land.--Subject to valid existing rights, all right, 
title, and interest (including improvements and appurtenances) of the 
United States in and to the Federal land described in subsection (b) 
shall be held in trust by the United States for the benefit of the 
Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians for nongaming purposes.
    (b) Land Description.--The land taken into trust under subsection 
(a) is the approximately 80 acres of Federal land under the 
administrative jurisdiction of the United States Forest Service, 
located in Tuolumne County, California, and described as follows:
            (1) Southwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 1 
        North, Range 16 East.
            (2) Northeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 
        1 North, Range 16 East of the Mount Diablo Meridian.
    (c) Gaming.--Class II and class III gaming (as those terms are 
defined in section 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 
2703)) shall not be permitted at any time on the land taken into trust 
under subsection (a).

            Passed the House of Representatives July 5, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 549

114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3079

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To take certain Federal land located in Tuolumne County, California, 
into trust for the benefit of the Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              July 7, 2016

                 Read twice and placed on the calendar
```
#### F. C. CRANE CO., Appellant, v. Mrs. Olive BOZARTH, Appellee.

No. 1740.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

April 9, 1936.

Touchstone, Wight, Gormley & Price, of Dallas, for appellant.

J. B. Keith and J. A. Johnson, both of Stephenville, for appellee.

GALLAGHER, Chief Justice.

This appeal is prosecuted from an order of the court overruling a plea of privilege. It is a companion case to No. 1739, entitled -F. C. Crane Company v. Homer Gosdin (Tex.Civ.App.) 94 S.W.(2d) 221. Appellee was a guest in Gos-din’s car and received serious injuries when it fell through the crushed bridge. The issues of fact and law involved in this cause are the same as in said cause No. 1739. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.
#### VINEYARD v. STATE.

No. 18707.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 6, 1937.

Reynolds & Heare and D. G. Reynolds, all of Shamrock, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the -State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The proof on the part of the State was to the effect that appellant and Alvin Per-rin stole some automobile wheels and tires from J. A. Miller. Recently after the theft officers found said property in the possession of appellant. Perrin testified to the effect that he and appellant stole said property. Appellant did not testify.

It is shown in bill .of exception No. 1 that in argument to the jury the district attorney used language as follows: “The recent possession, unexplained, of stolen property is sufficient to warrant a convic*363tion and sustain Same.” Appellant objected to said remarks on the ground that they constituted a reference to his failure to testify. It is unnecessary to determine whether the objection was well taken. See Berry v. State, 87 Tex.Cr.R. 559, 223 S.W. 212. The bill of exception is deficient in failing to show that only appellant was in a position to explain his possession of the stolen property.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

MORROW, P. J., absent.
KPMG LLP

     Suite 2000
     1211 South West Fifth Avenue
     Portland, OR 97204



               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


The Board of Directors
Potlatch Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-00805, 33-28220, 333-17145, 33-30836, 33-54515, 333-12017 and 333-28079) on
Form S-8 of Potlatch Corporation of our report dated January 26, 2000,
relating to the balance sheets of Potlatch Corporation and consolidated
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related statements of
earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1999 which report appears in the
December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Potlatch Corporation.




                                                KPMG LLP

March 29, 2000


                                                                 Exhibit (23)
#### McCarty v. STATE.

No. 14245.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 27, 1931.

L. D. Ratliff, Dennis P. Ratliff, and L. D. Ratliff, Jr., all of Haskell, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, J.

The prosecution was under article 1377, P. C. (1925), amended by Acts of the- Second Called Session of the Forty-First Legislature (1929), chapter 26, page 41 (Vernon’s Ann. P. C. art. 1377). The act in substance provides that whoever shall enter upon the inclosed lands of another without the' consent of the owner, and “shall catch or take or attempt to catch or take, any fish,” etc., shall be guilty of an offense. Conviction resulted with punishment assessed at a fine of $10.

The sufficiency of the complaint and information was challenged by motion to quash upon various grounds, one being that the charge against appellant was uncertain, it being alleged in the disjunctive. That the state’s pleading was defective in the particu*49lar mentioned is supported by many authorities cited in section 503, Branch’s Ann. Tex. P. O.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed, under the present pleading.
Ronal Stetner and Co
Certified Public Accountants (Isr)

Haifa, February 10, 1997

Auditors' Report to the Shareholders of Lev Hamifratz Ltd.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Lev Hamifratz Ltd. (the
Company) as at December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the consolidated balance sheets of
the Company and its subsidiaries as at such dates, and the related statements of
income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years, the
last of which ended December 31, 1996. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's Board of Directors and of its Management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, including standards prescribed by the Auditors Regulations (Manner of
Auditor's Performance) 1973. Such standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free of
material misstatement, whether due to error or intentional misrepresentation. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the Board of
Directors and by Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

The above mentioned financial statements were prepared on the basis of the
historical cost convention, in historical values adjusted for the changes in the
general purchasing power of the Israeli currency, in accordance with opinions of
the Institute of Certified Public Accountants in Israel. Condensed data of the
Company in nominal historical values, on the basis of which its adjusted
financial statements were prepared, is presented in Note 23.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of the Company and the
consolidated financial position of the Company and its subsidiaries as at
December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the results of their operations, the last of
which ended December 31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. Furthermore, these statements have, in our opinion, been prepared in
accordance with the Securities Regulations (Preparation of Annual Financial
Statements) 1993.

Ronal Stetner and Co
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.7


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


    
This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is entered into this 31st day of October, 2017, between CNO Services, LLC (the “Company”) and Christopher J. Nickele (“Executive”).


Recitals


A.The Company and Executive entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of December 18, 2014 and an Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of August 17, 2017 (collectively, the “Agreement”).


B.The Company and Executive desire to further amend the Agreement to extend its Term (as defined in the Agreement) and to make the other changes set forth herein. 
    
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants contained herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged:


		
	1.
	Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended solely to change the ending date of the Term from October 31, 2017 to October 31, 2018.  All other provisions of Section 2 of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.  




		
	2.
	Section 5(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended solely to change “2017 bonus” in the penultimate sentence to “2018 bonus.”  All other provisions of Section 5(b) of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.




		
	3.
	All provisions of the Agreement not amended hereby shall remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date first above written.


CNO SERVICES, LLC


	
		
	By:
	/s/ Gary C. Bhojwani

	 
	Gary C. Bhojwani

	 
	President






	
		
	 
	/s/ Christopher J. Nickele

	 
	Christopher J. Nickele
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

          - [OMB Control No. 2900-0717]

# AGENCY:

Human Resources and Administration/Operations, Security, and Preparedness, Department of Veterans Affairs.

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

                        On Friday, September 13, 2024, the Human Resources and Administration/Operations, Security, and Preparedness, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection Human Resources and Administration/Operations, Security, and Preparedness (VA Form 0730b). This notice was published in error; therefore, this document corrects that error by withdrawing this FR notice.                    

# DATES:

As of September 19, 2024, the FR notice (document number 2024-20802) published at 89 FR 75059 on Friday, September 13, 2024, is withdrawn.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Maribel Aponte, Office of Enterprise and Integration, Data Governance Analytics (008), 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20006, (202) 202-461-8900, or email                         *maribel.aponte@va.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

FR Doc. 2024-75059, published on September 13, 2024 (89 FR 75059), is withdrawn by this notice.

By direction of the Secretary.

Maribel Aponte,

VA PRA Clearance Officer, Office of Enterprise and Integration/Data Governance Analytics, Department of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2024-21834 Filed 9-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
|EXHIBIT 12                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------
|COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
|For Year Ended December 31, 2000                            
|(Dollar Amounts in Thousands)                               





|                                         | Potomac Edison Company
|---------------------------------------- | ----------------------
|Earnings:                                |                       
|Net Income                               | $                     
|Fixed charges (see below)                | 45,334                
|Income taxes                             | 37,172                
|Amortization of capitalized interest     | 2                     
|Income distributions of equity investees | 4,480                 
|Less: Capitalized interest               | (326)                 
|Inc from unconsolidated equity           |                       
|investees                                |                       
|Total earnings                           | $                     
|                                         |                       
|Fixed Charges:                           |                       
|Interest on long-term debt               | $                     
|Other interest                           | 3,069                 
|Estimated interest component of rentals  | $                     
|Total fixed charges                      | $                     
|                                         |                       
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges       | 3.70
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Gurata Gold, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shaun P. Davis,
President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of
Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and






(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.













/s/
Shaun P. Davis


Shaun P.
Davis


Chief
Executive Officer






October
17, 2008











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Gurata Gold, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shaun P. Davis, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and






(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











/s/
Shaun P. Davis


Shaun P.
Davis


Chief
Financial Officer






October
17, 2008
# C_2023242EN.01001001.xml

| 7.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/10

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107379

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 242/09)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 13.6.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107379 |
| Member State | Hungary |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Amendment request of the Hungarian TCTF umbrella scheme SA.103089 (as amended) |
| Legal basis | See attachment. |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 2 631 720 000 HUF
  Annual budget: 2 631 720 000 HUF |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2022 |
| Economic sectors | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Defence, Cabinet Office of the Prime Minister, Kecskemét Enterprise Development Fund, Kecskemét Urban Development Fund, Hungarian Export-Import Bank, managing authorities of Hungarian Operational Programmes, Hiventures Venture Capital Fund Management CLS., local governments of Hungary and undertakings under the (majority) control of the state and local governments, Prime Minister’s Office |
| 1014 Budapest, Színház utca 1. |

Date of adoption of the decision

13.6.2023

Aid number

SA.107379

Member State

Hungary

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Amendment request of the Hungarian TCTF umbrella scheme SA.103089 (as amended)

Legal basis

See attachment.

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 2 631 720 000 HUF

Annual budget: 2 631 720 000 HUF

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2022

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Defence, Cabinet Office of the Prime Minister, Kecskemét Enterprise Development Fund, Kecskemét Urban Development Fund, Hungarian Export-Import Bank, managing authorities of Hungarian Operational Programmes, Hiventures Venture Capital Fund Management CLS., local governments of Hungary and undertakings under the (majority) control of the state and local governments, Prime Minister’s Office

1014 Budapest, Színház utca 1.

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---