alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
 [LOGO]                                         One International Place
                                                Boston, Massachusetts 02110-9801
                                                617/439-9700 Fax 617/439-0476

                                                1441 Main Street
                                                Springfield, Massachusetts 01103
                                                413/747-9042 Fax 413/733-1990

                                                http://www.wolfandco.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Number
333-1176 (dated February 7, 1996 on Form S-3), Registration Statement Number
333-1178 (dated February 8, 1996 on Form S-8), Registration Statement Number
333-3004 (dated March 29, 1996 on Form S-8) and Registration Statement Number
333-17439 (dated December 6, 1996 on Form S-8) of People's Bancshares, Inc. of
our report dated January 23, 1998 on the financial statements of People's
Bancshares, Inc., appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of People's
Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1997.








Wolf & Company, P.C.
--------------------
Wolf & Company, P.C.


Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 1998









      Member of Associated Regional Accounting Firms and TGI International
# Official Journal C 144/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.144.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 144 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5624 May 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.144.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 144

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5624 May 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 144/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 144/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 144/02 | Euro exchange rates | 6 |
| 2013/C 144/03 | Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 27 Member States applicable as from 1 June 2013(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1)) | 7 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 144/02

Euro exchange rates

6

2013/C 144/03

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 27 Member States applicable as from 1 June 2013(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

7

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 144/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6943 — Triton/Befesa) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2013/C 144/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6943 — Triton/Befesa) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2013/C 144/05 | Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

2013/C 144/05

Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover)

Note to the reader

s3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
|   | 1. | I      am the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of North      American Energy Resources, Inc. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Attached      to this certification is Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2010,      a periodic report (the “periodic report”) filed by the issuer with the      Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), which contains      condensed financial statements. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | I      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  that |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | The      periodic report containing the condensed financial statements fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange      Act, and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | The      information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations      of the issuer for the periodspresented. |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| December      7, 2010 | /s/ Ross E. Silvey                  |   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                  | Ross      E. Silvey                 |   |
|                  | Chief      Executive Officer and    |   |
|                  | Acting      Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 906 OF
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of TIB Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, David P. Johnson, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.



Date:    May 9, 2003                /s/ David P. Johnson
         --------------             --------------------------------------------
                                    David P. Johnson
                                    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                    Officer


                                       23
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks

Consistent with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 1622(d), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency previously declared on September 14, 2001, in Proclamation 7463, with respect to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the United States.

Because the terrorist threat continues, the national emergency declared on September 14, 2001, and the powers and authorities adopted to deal with that emergency must continue in effect beyond September 14, 2024. Therefore, I am continuing in effect for an additional year the national emergency that was declared on September 14, 2001, with respect to the terrorist threat.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2024-20799

Billing code 3395-F4-P
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Eric Albright <ealbright@environcorp.com>

Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 8:55 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Cc: Shane Young

Subject: Figures for SPI-Anderson public hearing

Categories: Red Category, EZ Record - Shared

Shaheerah:

  

I got your voice mail, but am in a meeting.  We are revising draft figures following review by SPI, and should be able to

get them to you today.

  

Thanks.

  

Eric

  

Eric Albright, PE | Senior Manager

ENVIRON International Corporation

19020 33rd Avenue W, Suite 310 | Lynnwood, WA 98036 

T: +1 425 412 1804 | F: +1 425 412 1840 | M: +1 206 909 0591

ealbright@environcorp.com

  

This message contains information that may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected by law from 

disclosure. It is intended for the exclusive use of the Addressee(s). Unless you are the addressee or authorized 

agent of the addressee, you may not review, copy, distribute or disclose to anyone the message or any 

information contained within. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by electronic 

reply to email@environcorp.com and immediately delete all copies of the message.
#### AUBURN-DALLAS CO. v. F. DEL RIO C. et al.

No. 8853.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

June 1, 1932.

Rehearing Denied June 22, 1932.

Nowlin Randolph, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Terrell, Davis, Hall & Clemens, T. F. Weiss, A. Ar. Knight, and W. C. Davis, all of San Antonio, for appellees.

FLY, C. J.

This suit was instituted by appellant against F. Del Rio C., as a garnishee, the writ being issued to ascertain if he was indebted to Cou-rand-Hess-Needham Company, Incorporated, or had in his possession any effects belonging to said corporation. He answered that he owed the corporation $757.27. The Finance Corporation of America intervened in the suit, claiming that the amount admitted to be due to Courand-Hess-Needham, Inc., was not due to that corporation but to the intervener, Who had obtained the debt from that corporation. The.original corporation was made a party by the garnishee.

The suit began in the Thirty-Seventh district court and was then transferred to the Fifty-Seventh district court, where it was tried. The court decided that the garnishee did not owe Courand-Hess-Needham the money, but owed it to the Finance Corporation, and judgment was rendered that appellant take nothing against the garnishee, and that the Finance Corporation of America recover the $757.27, which had been deposited in the court by the garnishee, and that appellant pay all costs, including $50' for attorney’s fee paid by the garnishee.

The facts show that the garnishee was indebted to Courand-Hess-Needham, Inc., in the sum of $757.27; before the writ of garnishment was issued the last-named company made a transfer, in good faith, to the Finance Corporation, of the amount of the debt owed to it by the.garnishee; and at the time the writ of garnishment was served garnishee did not owe any sum to Courand-Hess-Needham, Inc., but the debt was due to the . Finance Corporation of America. The transfer was at once recorded. "

Under this state of facts the first proposition, which questions the sufficiency of the facts to sustain the judgment, is overruled.

The second proposition is without merit and is overruled. The evidence showed that the debt against the garnishee was transferred in writing to the Finance Corporation, and there is no evidence of fraud or bad faith. When the garnishment was served the debt was due the Finance Corporation. The transfer was properly made, and recorded.

None of the propositions are well taken and all will be overruled.

The judgment is affirmed.
---

|Exhibit 32.1                                 
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350                       
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tecton Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: September 19, 2007 | /s/Norman Meier                   
|------------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                          | Norman Meier                      
|                          | President, Chief Executive Officer

---
EXHIBIT 23

                    AUDITOR'S CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULES



Board of Directors and
Stockholders
Photo Control Corporation


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Photo Control Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1997, of
our report, dated January 30, 1998, appearing in the Company's 1996 Annual
Report to Shareholders. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
such report in the registration statements on Form S-8 for the Photo Control
Stock Option Plan.

In the course of our audit of the financial statements referred to in our
report, dated January 30, 1998, included in the Company's 1997 Annual Report to
Shareholders, we also audited the supporting schedule listed in Item 14(a)(2) of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In our opinion, the schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.



January 30, 1998                                VIRCHOW KRAUSE, & COMPANY, LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7946

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RAYMOND JOSEPH, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District

Judge. (3:04-cr-00360-HEH)

Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 5, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Joseph, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Catherine Wu,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Joseph, Jr. appeals the district court’s order

denying his “Motion for Modification of Presentence Report,” made

over one year after he was sentenced for distribution of cocaine.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Joseph, No. 3:04-cr-00360-HEH (E.D. Va.

Nov. 2, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Johnny R. Thomas, Chief Executive Officer of Consolidation Services, Inc., Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(a)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: November 19, 2007

CONSOLIDATION SERVICES, INC.





By: /s/ Johnny R. Thomas





Johnny R. Thomas

Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Consolidation Services, Inc. and will be retained by Consolidation Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1**

*CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM*

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 333-14577, 333-65479, 333-41950, 333-90276, 333-102227, 333-135013, 333-144863, 333-144864, 333-152999, and 333-153001, on Form S-8 of our reports dated May 28, 2009, relating to the financial statements of PrecisionCastparts Corp. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension andOther Postretirement Benefit Plans as of April 1, 2007), and the effectiveness of Precision Castparts Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Precision Castparts Corp. for the yearended March 29, 2009. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Portland, Oregon 

May 28, 2009
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2026/2005

of 13 December 2005         

opening tariff quotas for 2006 and the following years for the importation into the European Community of certain goods from Turkey resulting from the processing of agricultural products covered by Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93 of 6 December 1993 laying down the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products (1), in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The annual Community tariff quotas for the importation of the goods from Turkey set out in the Annex are opened for the period from 1 January to 31 December 2006 and from 1 January to 31 December of the following years under the conditions set out in that Annex.

Admission to the benefit of those tariff quotas shall be subject to the presentation of an A.TR. movement certificate in accordance with Decision No 1/2001 of the EC-Turkey Customs Cooperation Committee.

Article 2

The Community tariff quotas referred to in Article 1 shall be managed by the Commission in accordance with Articles 308a, 308b and 308c of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall be applicable from 1 January 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2005.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 318, 20.12.1993, p. 18. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2580/2000 (OJ L 298, 25.11.2000, p. 5).

(2)OJ L 126, 17.5.1997, p. 26.

(3)OJ L 98, 7.4.2001, p. 31.

(4)OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 883/2005 (OJ L 148, 11.6.2005, p. 5).

----

ANNEX

----
#### ANDERSON et al. v. GAZAWAY.

No. 3165.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

Feb. 28, 1935.

J. D. Barker, of Sweetwater, for plaintiffs in error.

L. B. Reed, of Bamesa, and Frank Stubbe-man, of Midland, for defendant in error.

*482HIGGINS, Justice.

This is an action in trespass , to try title by defendant in error against the heirs at law of Mary N. Powell, deceased, to recover a tract of land resulting in judgment in favor of the defendant in error. The record contains no statement of facts. The findings of the trial court show the land was community property of J. M. Powell and wife, Mary N. Powell. It was conveyed to J. M. Powell by G. W. Foy and wife. Later, Mrs. Powell died. Subsequent to her death J. M. Powell conveyed the land to A. W. Haywood, and by mesne conveyances the same passed for a valuable consideration to J. A. Gazaway who later conveyed to J. B. Gazawdy-, tile defendant in error.

The legal title to the land vested in J. M. Powell when it was conveyed to him by Foy and wife. Mrs. Powell’s title was equitable. Speer’s Marital Rights (3d Ed.) § 345; Mitchell v. Schofield, 106 Tex. 512, 171 S. W. 1121.

To defeat the legal title thus acquired by defendant in error, the burden was upon the plaintiffs in *error to*show defendant in error and his grantors had acquired the land with notice,, actual or .constructive, of the equitable title which plaintiffs in error had inherited from Mrs. Powell. Duckworth v. Collie (Tex. Civ. App.) 235 S. W. 924; Mangum v. White, 16 Tex. Civ. App. 254, 41 S. W. 80; Wallis, Landes *&*Co. v. Dehart (Tex. Civ. App.) 108 S. W. 180; Ruedas v. O’Shea (Tex. Civ. App.) 127 S. W. 891.

The court in its findings states that no such evidence was offered. In the absence of such evidence, judgment for defendant in error followed necessarily.

The court found affirmatively that J. A. Gazaway purchased without notice, and error is assigned to the admission of J. A. Gazaway’s testimony so showing. It was not necessary for defendant in error to offer such evidence. It merely strengthened the presumption which the law raised in his favor. Its admission was not error.

Other propositions assert defendant in error’s title is equitable, and it was incumbent upon him to plead his title specially. These propositions are based upon the erroneous assumption that defendant in error’s title to Mrs. Powell’s interest is equitable. The authorities cited show that he acquired the legal title to the land. Furthermore, an equitable title is sufficient to support the action of trespass to try title. See cases cited in 16 Mich-ie’s Digest, 608. The cases cited by plaintiffs in error hold that; equitable relief cannot be had in the statutory action of trespass to try title. The defendant in error was not seeking equitable relief, nor was any such relief granted. The judgment in favor of defendant in error was for title and possession.

Affirmed.