alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Milton Jones, Jr., * From the 259th District Court

 of Jones County,

 Trial Court No. 023467.

Vs. No. 11-17-00112-CV * May 9, 2019

George D. Patterson, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed with respect to George D. 

Patterson’s attorney’s fees, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a 

proper assessment of those fees. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed 75% 

against Milton Jones, Jr. and 25% against George D. Patterson.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

AXEL BARRETO,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 304 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

AXEL BARRETO,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 305 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 25
                                   ----------


         POWER OF ATTORNEY CONCERNING FORM 10-K FISCAL DECEMBER 31, 2002
         ---------------------------------------------------------------

Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints CURTIS R.
JACKELS his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place, and stead, in
any and all capacities to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2002, and any or all amendments to such Annual Report on
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary
to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he
might or could do in person, ratifying and confirming all that said
attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or
cause to be done by virtue thereof.

Signature                                                        Date
---------                                                        -----

/s/ Curtis R. Jackels, Chief Executive                           March 7, 2003
Officer, President and Director


/s/John R. Helmen, Chairman                                      March 7, 2003


/s/James R. Loomis, Director                                     March 7, 2003


/s/Richard P. Kiphart, Director                                  March 7, 2003


/s/Scott S. Meyers, Director                                     March 7, 2003


/s/John McMillan, Director                                       March 7, 2003


                                       31
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 6, 2018

No. 04-18-00926-CV

IN RE Bertha Bermea SANCHEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On December 5, 2018, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court believes 

a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in interest may file a response to the 

petition in this court no later than December 27, 2018. Any such response must conform to 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

It is so ORDERED on December 6, 2018.

PER CURIAM

 ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

 KEITH E. HOTTLE,

 Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 15-01-30519-MCVAJA, styled Marisol Perez Sotello v. Bertha Bermea 

Sanchez, pending in the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas, the Honorable Amado J. Abascal, 

III presiding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,839
<SECURITIES>                                     5,789
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,097
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,056
<PP&E>                                         281,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                 163,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 259,653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,710
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,068
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   259,653
<SALES>                                        151,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               176,771
<CGS>                                          148,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  154,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,964
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,367)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,601)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,766)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,766)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.62)
        

</TABLE>
7ermontSuperiorCourtFiled08/21/24CaledoniaUnit

## VERMONTSUPERIOR

## COURTCaledonia

### Unit1126

### MainStreet

### SuiteSt.

### Johnsbury

## VT05819

### 802-748-6600

### www.vermontjudiciary.org

## CIVILDIVISIONCase

### No.23-CV-04996

## Atticus

## Gillenv.

## Madeleine

## Muller

# ENTRYREGARDINGMOTIONTitle:Motionto

### Continue;

### Motionto

### ContinueBench

### Trial;Benchtrial,

### Supplemental

### (Motion:2;3)

### Filer:

### Corby

### A.Gary;

### Corby

### A.GaryFiledDate:

### August20,

### 2024;

### August20,

### 2024

### Themotionis

## GRANTED.Aslaid

### outinhis

### motionandits

### supplement,

### Attorney

### Garyhas

### cold.!

### Itis

### apparentlyan

### illness

### thathas

### puthim,temporarilyout

### ofcommission,andone

### thathas

### left

### him

### withoutenoughtime

### orenergytoprepare

### forthiscase.

### TheCourtis

### notinsensitiveto

### party'shealth,and

### in

### situation

### likethis

### wherethere

### wouldbe

### question

### ofAttorneyGary'sabilityto

### representhis

### clienttothe

### best

### ofhis

### abilityas

### wellas

### question

### ofcontagion

### foreveryoneelse,the

### Courtfinds

### it

### bothsensibleand

### inthebest

### interests

### ofeveryoneto

### canceland

### re-scheduletothe

### nextavailabledate.

### Based

### onthe

### foregoing,the

### August22,

### 2024

### benchtrial

### inthis

### matteris

### cancelled,andthe

### Courtwillre-schedule

### it

### for

### nextearliest

### availabledate.

### So

### Ordered.Electronicallysignedon

### 8/21/20242:48

### AMpursuantto

### V.R.E.F.9(d)DanielRichardsonSuperiorCourt

### JudgeAttorneyGary'smotiondrawstotheCourt'smindthefamousarticlebyGayTaleseaboutFrankSinatrawherehewrites,"SinatrawithcoldisPicassowithoutpaint,Ferrariwithout

### fuel-onlyworse.ForthecommoncoldrobsSinatraofthatuninsurablejewel,hisvoice,cuttingintothecoreofhisconfidence,anditaffectsnotonlyhisownpsychebutalsoseemstocausekindofpsychosomaticnasaldripwithindozensofpeoplewhoworkforhim,drinkwithhim,lovehim,dependonhimfortheirownwelfareandstability."G.Talese,FrankSinatraHasCold,Esquire(April1966).EntryRegardingMotionPage

## lof123-CV-04996AtticusGillenv.MadeleineMuller
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

KAREN RAZLER THEK

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

FROM INACTIVE STATUS

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 180 DB 2017 (No. 7 RST 2018)

Attorney Registration No. 92827

(Montgomery County)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2018, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated February 12, 2018, is approved and it is ORDERED 

that Karen Razler Thek, who has been on Inactive Status, has never been suspended or 

disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and 

learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, 

hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The 

expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall 

be paid by the Petitioner.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 133227 & (52) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. MONEY SOURCE FINANCIAL, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Justices Cross-Appellee,

v SC: 133227 COA: 270084 Washtenaw CC: 03-001378-CZ ANN ARBOR COMMERCE BANK,Defendant/Third-Party PlaintiffAppellee/Cross-Appellee,

v

NATIONAL CITY BANK,Third-Party Defendant/CrossPlaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

and

WILLIAM DAVIS and WILLIAM FAULKNER, Third-Party Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is therefore moot and is DENIED.

s0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BERNARDO MORALES

GUADARRAMA; YOLANDA

MORALES,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-75115

Agency Nos. A071-632-165

 A095-300-261

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 10, 2011** 

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Bernardo Morales Guadarrama and Yolanda Morales, natives and citizens of

Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

order denying their motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C.

FILED

JAN 25 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-75115

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and

review de novo due process claims. Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th

Cir. 2002). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to

reopen where petitioners failed to demonstrate that evidence of Morales

Guadarrama’s medical conditions was previously unavailable. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c); Romero-Ruiz v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 1057, 1063-64 (9th Cir. 2008). 

The evidence petitioners presented regarding their son’s psychological

condition with their motion to reopen concerned the same basic hardship grounds

as their application for cancellation of removal. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439

F.3d 592, 602-03 (9th Cir. 2006). We therefore lack jurisdiction to review the

BIA’s discretionary determination that the evidence was insufficient to establish a

prima facie case of hardship. See id. at 601.

Petitioners’ contention that the BIA failed to consider evidence of hardship

to their U.S. citizen daughter is not supported by the record. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
3 08-75115
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, J. Powell Brown, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Brown & Brown, Inc. (Registrant); 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The Registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: February 26, 2010
<PAGE>


                              EXHIBIT 12

  COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                For Year Ended December 31, 1999

                 (Dollar Amounts in Thousands)



                                        The Potomac Edison Company

Earnings:
     Net Income                                   $100,582*
     Fixed charges (see below)                      46,243
     Income taxes                                   40,613*

     Total earnings                               $187,438


Fixed Charges:
     Interest on long-term debt                   $ 42,872
     Other interest                                  2,031
     Estimated interest
       component of rentals                          1,340

     Total fixed charges                          $ 46,243


Ratio of Earnings to
  Fixed Charges                                       4.05


*Excludes the effect of the extraordinary charge.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF

THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the Annual Report of Rewards Network Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher J. Locke, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                                                  
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|March 12, 2009 |  | /s/    CHRISTOPHER J.
LOCKE                      
|               |  | Christopher J. Locke                             
|               |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      14,927,460
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,623,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                   821,127
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,126,554
<PP&E>                                      11,176,881
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,771,276
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,495,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,743,392
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,853
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,741,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,495,364
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,343,332
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,100,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            26,893,254
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               100,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (958,953)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (791,437)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,212,984
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,004,421)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
----

**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)**

I, Sidong Zhang, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofChina Dasheng Biotechnology Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of thesmall business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the smallbusiness issuer and have: 

> 
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or  caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our  supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small  business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us  by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business  issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;  and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred  during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small  business issuer’s second fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that  has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

> 
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in  the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which  are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability  to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves  management or other employees who have a significant role in the small  business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: May 12, 2009 

/s/ Sidong Zhang                                            Sidong Zhang, Chief Executive Officer 

----