alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,007,695
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  471,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,000
<INVENTORY>                                    100,369
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,636,826
<PP&E>                                       1,210,939
<DEPRECIATION>                                 280,777
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,051,370
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,400,771
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        6,532,973
<PREFERRED>                                    391,087
<COMMON>                                       524,996
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,961,901)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,051,370
<SALES>                                        509,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               838,603
<CGS>                                          423,717
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,504,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (676,406)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (676,406)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (676,406)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)
        


</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 36/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 36 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6517 February 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 36

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6517 February 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/191 of 16 February 2022 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/191 of 16 February 2022 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### East End Hospital, Appellant, *v.*Evatt, Tax Commr., et al., Appellees.

(No. 29039

Decided April 29, 1942.)

*Mr. E. G. Rarey,*for appellant.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. Perry L. Graham,*for appellees.

By the Court.

This case is in this court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. The action complained of is the denial of the application for exemption of certain personal property, consisting of X-ray equipment, from taxation for the year 1940. The ground upon which such application was based was that such X-ray equipment is property of “an institution used exclusively for charitable purposes.”

The essential facts are not in controversy. The East End Hospital of Cleveland, Ohio, was incorporated in 1933 as a corporation not for profit. It is merely an operating company, having rented the building and equipment consisting of 45 beds, only 23 of which are used for patients, the rest being “for the help.”

In 1935 the applicant purchased the complete X-ray equipment involved in this proceeding. The record discloses that this X-ray equipment is the only property owned by the applicant and there is no evidence indicating that it is or has been used for any charitable purpose.

It is well settled that the use of property exclusively for charitable purposes- is the criterion of exemption thereof. There is no presumption in favor of the ex-*609eruption of property from taxation, and before'such exemption is authorized the right thereto must be established by evidence, the burden of producing which is, of course, upon the applicant. The right to such exemption must be shown indubitably to exist. *Cullitan, Pros. Atty.,*v. *Cunningham Sanitarium,*134 Ohio St., 99, 16 N. E. (2d), 205

It follows that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals denying the application for exemption is correct and is therefore affirmed.

*Decision, affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Bettman, J., not participating.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 02-4058



# 
S ARAY M OM , Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge.

(CR-01-211) Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: September 23, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSELSamuel P. Simpson, V, MONTGOMERY & SIMPSON, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Sara E. Flannery, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM:Saray Mom appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute MDMA, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a)(1) (2000). Mom asserts the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress drugs found on his person. Finding no error, we affirm. We review the factual findings underlying a motion to suppress for clear error, while reviewing legal determinations de novo. Ornelas v. United States , 517 U.S. 690, 699 (1996); United States v. Rusher , 966 F.2d 868, 873 (4th Cir. 1992). When a suppression motion has beendenied, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the government. United States v. Seidman , 156 F.3d 542, 547 (4th Cir. 1998).Mom contends the arresting officers did not have reasonable suspicion to justify seizing him. We have reviewed the circumstances surrounding the stop of the vehicle in which Mom was a passenger and the seizure of Mom and find that reasonable suspicion of criminal activity existed. See Whren v. United States , 517 U.S. 806, 809-10 (1996); Terry v. Ohio , 392 U.S. 1, 20-22 (1968). Mom contends the district court erred in determining his consentto search his person was voluntary. We review the district court’s factual findings on consent under a clearly erroneous standard. United States v. Lattimore , 87 F.3d 647, 650 (4th Cir. 1996) (en banc). TheGovernment must establish knowing and voluntary consent by a preponderance of the evidence, which is assessed under a totality of the circumstances test. Id . With these standards in mind, we find no error in the district court’s determination that Mom voluntarily consented to a search of his person. Accordingly, we affirm Mom’s conviction. We dispense with oralargument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. M OM
# C_2022214EN.01004201.xml

| 31.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/42

---

Special report No 9/2022

Climate spending in the 2014-2020 EU budget – not as high as reported

(2022/C 214/07)

The Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special report No 9/2022 ‘Climate spending in the 2014-2020 EU budget – not as high as reported’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Court of Auditors’ Internet: http://eca.europa.eu

---
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML Systematic Momentum FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis,Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, themanager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: August 14,  2009 |                                          |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                          |
| By                          | /s/ BARBRA E. KOCSIS                          |   |
|                        | Barbra E. Kocsis                              |   |
|                        | Chief Financial Officer                       |   |
|                        | (Principal Financial  and Accounting Officer) |   |

 

----
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of First Merchants Corporation on Form S-8 (File Number 333-50484) of our report dated June 26, 2012, of our audit on the financial statements of First Merchants Corporation Retirement Income and Savings Plan for the year ended December 31, 2011, which report is included in its Annual Report on Form 11-K.
 
 
 
 /s/ BKD, LLP
 
 Indianapolis, Indiana
 June 26, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<CIK>                         0001013564
<NAME>                        Farm Family Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1997
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           247,807
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          9,181
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            9,456
<EQUITIES>                                     4,077
<MORTGAGE>                                     1,682
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 270,002
<CASH>                                         3,747
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             11,419
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         32,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 362,104
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                150,297
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            68,529
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 21,080
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          118,007
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                1,277
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       53
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   362,104
<PREMIUMS>                                     109,191
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            13,529
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             5,649
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 719
<BENEFITS>                                     76,421
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    31,961
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                20,452
<INCOME-TAX>                                   6,858
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            13,594
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   13,594
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  2.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.58
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 114,383
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            76,622
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (198)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             30,470
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               36,175
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                124,158
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7571

WILLIAM COOK HOLLOWAY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA97-3409-S) Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 14, 1998 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Cook Holloway, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Holloway v. Corcoran , No. CA-97-3409-S (D. Md. Oct. 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):
 August 6, 2007 (August 6, 2007)
 
 T-3 ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction 
of Incorporation)
    
    000-19580
(Commission File Number)
    
    76-0697390
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 7135 Ardmore
Houston, Texas 77054
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
 (713) 996-4110
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition
   Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits
   2




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
 T-3 ENERGY SERVICES, INC.Date: August 6, 2007
    By:
    /s/    Michael T. MinoMichael T. MinoChief Financial Officer
and Vice President 3




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Conference Call Script dated August 6, 2007
 4
# Official Journal L 39/10 F

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 39 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5010 February 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 39

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5010 February 2007

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 105/2007 of 1 February 2007 amending the annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 105/2007 of 1 February 2007 amending the annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### MANSKE v. STATE.

No. 17922.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 12, 1936.

W. S. Leslie and E. E. Murphy, both of San Angelo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is possession of a still for manufacturing spirituous liquor capable of producing intoxication; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Pending appeal, the law under which appellant was convicted has been repealed.

The judgment is-reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
# Official Journal C 398/12 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 398 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5712 November 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 398

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5712 November 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2014/C 398/01 | Annual report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2013, together with the institutions’ replies | 1 |
| 2014/C 398/02 | Annual report of the Court of Auditors on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDFs) concerning the financial year 2013, together with the Commission's replies | 289 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Auditors

2014/C 398/01

Annual report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2013, together with the institutions’ replies

1

2014/C 398/02

Annual report of the Court of Auditors on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDFs) concerning the financial year 2013, together with the Commission's replies

289

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0560

TERRY SULLIVAN,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

JAN 2 6 2021

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana

ORDER

Pursuant to Appellant's motion for an extension of time, and good cause therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Appellant has until March 8, 2021, within which to file his

opening brief.

DATED this 4 day of January, 2021.

For the Court,

Chief Justice

01/26/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0560
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24 - 0148 IN THE MATTER OF: J.L.O., Respondent and Appellant. **G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until October 2 , 2024 to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court August 27 2024

08/27/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0148
EXHIBIT 21

PARENT AND SUBSIDIARIES
  (Included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and Wholly-owned)

National Presto Industries, Inc.
Eau Claire, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)

         Its Subsidiaries:
                  National Holding Investment Company
                  Wilmington, Delaware (A Delaware Corporation)

                  Its Subsidiaries:
                           Presto Manufacturing Company
                           Jackson, Mississippi (A Mississippi Corporation)

                           Its Division:
                                    Presto Products Manufacturing Company
                                    Alamogordo, New Mexico

                           Century Leasing and Liquidating, Inc.
                           Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota Corporation)

                           Its Subsidiary:
                                    Presto Export, Inc. (Inactive)
                                    Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota
                                     Corporation)

                           Jackson Sales and Storage Company
                           Jackson, Mississippi (A Mississippi Corporation)

                           Canton Sales & Storage Company
                           Canton, Mississippi (A Mississippi Corporation)

                           Presto Export, Ltd.
                           Christiansted, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands (A
                            Virgin Islands Corporation)

                  National Defense Corporation
                  Eau Claire, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)

                  AMTEC Corporation
                  Janesville, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)

                  Presto Absorbent Products, Inc.
                  Eau Claire, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corpooration)

                  NPI Export Corporation (Inactive)
                  Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota Corporation)
Order entered April 11, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 22 - 00053 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF A.W., K.W., AND C.B., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 301st Judicial Distri ct Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 16 - 18501 No. 05 - 22 - 0005 4 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF A. H ., A CHILD On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 18 - 22246

O RDER Before the Court is the D epartment’s April 8, 2022 first motion to extend time to file its briefs

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the briefs be filed no later than April 29, 2022.

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE