# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

Filed: May 19, 2020

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

GLORIA MANETTA

, * UN PUBLISHED

*

Petitioner, * No. 18

- 172V

*

v. * Special Master Gowen

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation for Award;

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * P neumococcal con jugate;

* Shoulder Injury R elated to

* Vaccine Administration ( “ SIRVA ” )

. Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Christina Ciampo lillo

, Conway, Homer

, P.C., Bos ton, MA, for petitione r.

Adriana R. Teitel

, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

DECISION FOR STIPULATION 1

O n Fe b ruary 2, 2018, Gloria Manetta ( “ petitioner ” ), filed a petition for compensa tion

under the National Vaccine Injury Program. 2 Petition at Prea mble (ECF No. 1). Petitioner

received a p neumococcal con jugate vaccine on June 23, 2015 . Stipulation at ¶ 2 (ECF No. 50 )

. Petitio ner alleges that as a result of receiving the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine , she suffered a

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration ( “ SIRVA ” )

. Id. ; S tipulation at ¶ 4.

On May 19, 2020, respondent filed a stip ulation providing that a decision should be

entered awarding compensation to petitioner. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine is th e cause of petitioner’s alleged injuries, or any other injury or h er current condition. Id. at ¶ 6.

Nevertheless, maintaining their respective positions, the parties now agree that the issues

between them shall be settled and that a decision should be en tered awarding the compensation

1 P ursuant to the E

- Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), b ecause this opinion contains a

reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the website of the United States Court of

Federal Claims. The court’s website is at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7

. This means the

opinion will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. Before the opinion is posted on the court’s

website, eac h party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party:

(1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that

includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of

privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). “An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the

decision.” Id. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the opinion will be posted on the

court’s website without any changes. Id.

2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine

Injury A ct of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa

- 1 to

- 34 (2012)

(Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. §

300aa.2

to the petitioner according to the terms of the stipulation attached hereto as Appendix A. Id. at ¶

7.

The stipulation provides:

1) A lump sum of $ 50,000 .00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This

amount repr esents compensation for all damages , including pain and suffering

and past un re imbursable expe nses that would be available under 42 U.S.C. §

300aa

- 15(a)

.

I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount

and on the terms set forth therein. The Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDG MENT in

accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Thomas L. Gowen

Thomas L. Gowen

Special Master

3 Entry of judgment is expediated by each party’s filing notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine Rule

11(a).