alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Shaun P. Davis, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gurata Gold, Inc. for the period ended February 28, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gurata Gold, Inc.  Dated: April 14, 2010/s/  Shaun P. DavisShaun P. DavisPresident, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)Gurata Gold, Inc.   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Gurata Gold, Inc. and will be retained by Gurata Gold, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
         FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
         IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,918,452
<SECURITIES>                                    10,095,559
<RECEIVABLES>                                       15,734
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         43,895
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,445,900
<PP&E>                                             133,475
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (7,999)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,612,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              767,744
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            15,350
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,525,797
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,612,736
<SALES>                                             50,325
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    50,325
<CGS>                                                1,767
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,135,338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,650,427)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       681,637
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (968,790)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.07)



</TABLE>
# C_2023020EN.01001201.xml

| 20.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10940 – CPPIB / MONTAGU / UNIVERSAL INVESTMENT / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 20/02)

On 14 December 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10940. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10940. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
----

**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)**

I, Hongsheng Wang, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofChina Dasheng Biotechnology Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of thesmall business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the smallbusiness issuer and have: 

> 
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or  caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our  supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small  business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us  by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business  issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;  and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small  business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred  during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small  business issuer’s second fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that  has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

> 
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in  the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which  are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability  to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves  management or other employees who have a significant role in the small  business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: May 12, 2009 

/s/ Hongsheng Wang                                              Hongsheng Wang, Chief Financial Officer ** **
# L_2008269EN.01S00301.xml

| 10.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 269/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 269/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
# Official Journal L 262/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.262.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 262 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5527 September 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.262.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 262

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5527 September 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2012/506/EU |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision of 8 August 2012 amending Decision 2002/253/EC laying down case definitions for reporting communicable diseases to the Community network under Decision No 2119/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2012) 5538)

   (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2012/506/EU

*

Commission Implementing Decision of 8 August 2012 amending Decision 2002/253/EC laying down case definitions for reporting communicable diseases to the Community network under Decision No 2119/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2012) 5538)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2012) 5538)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Prime
Hospitality Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Douglas W. Vicari, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act

of 1934; and


The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition


and results of operations of the
Company.


| |  |                                                                              
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ RICHARD T. SZYMANSKI
    Richard T. Szymanski
    Chief Financial Officer

March 12, 2004
##### 



Exhibit 99.2
 
 More Than a Compressor Company
 Press Information
 Houston, August 6, 2007
 Hanover Compressor Company Announces Pricing of
Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations
     12001 North Houston Rosslyn, Houston, Texas 77086
(281) 447-8787www.hanover-co.com




---



##### 








---



##### 



About Hanover Compressor Company
 Forward-Looking Statements
  Additional Information




---



##### 



Participants in Solicitation
 Investor Relations Inquiries:   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 Vice President, Investor Relations and Technology
<PAGE>

MAXCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT 31.1 - CERTIFICATION

I, Max A. Coon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Maxco, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: July 14, 2005

                                    /s/ Max A. Coon
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Max A. Coon
                                    Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                                ENDORSEMENT NO. 1

                         Attached to and made a part of
                             AUTOMOBILE QUOTA SHARE
                        AGREEMENT OF REINSURANCE NO. 8937
                                     between
                           SAFE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY
                     (herein referred to as the "Company")
                                       and
                         GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION
                    (herein referred to as the "Reinsurer")

IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED that, as respects claims and losses resulting from
Occurrences taking place at and after 12:01 A.M., October 1, 2002, the Schedule
of Reinsurance set forth in ARTICLE V - LIABILITY OF THE REINSURER is amended to
read:

                            "SCHEDULE OF REINSURANCE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Company's Quota         Reinsurer's Quota    Limit of Liability
Share Percentage        Share Percentage     of the Reinsurer
----------------        ----------------     ----------------
<S>                     <C>                  <C>
      75%                     25%             25% of $50,000
</TABLE>

The sum of 25% of $900 shall be deducted from the Reinsurer's share of Net Loss
sustained hereunder arising out of each Occurrence."

In consideration of the above, the Reinsurer shall return to the Company the
appropriate percentage of the reinsurance premium unearned, calculated on the
monthly pro rata basis, less the commission previously allowed thereon.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
in

                         GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION
<PAGE>

duplicate,

this 29th day of December, 2002,

                                    SAFE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY

                                    /s/ ARI DESHE CEO
                                    ---------------------

Attest:_________________

and this 27th day of DECEMBER,2002.

                                    GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION

                                    /s/ Jon Schriber
                                    ---------------------
                                       Vice President

Attest: /s/ William J. Brassington
        --------------------------

                                      -2-
                               Agreement No. 8937

                         GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION
Stephen Thomas and Svetlana Thomas GeoDrone Robotics, LLC
4301 Stretton Farm Ct. Woodbridge, VA 22192
571.499.0177
703.862.8191 geodroneint@outlook.com

N ov

. 2 1 , 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Docket FAA 2015

- 2005, Petition for Amendment to Exemption No. 1 2 221

Dear Sir/Madam,

GeoDrone Robotics, LLC. (GDR), received FAA Exemption No. 12221 on July 29, 2015 authorizing GD R under section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to operate its unmanned aircraft system (UAS), the DJI Inspire 1, for various commercial purposes. In this petition for an amendment to Exemption No. 12221, GDR requests to operate two ad ditional UAS’s for the same purposes. The two UAS’s are the DJI P hantom 3 Professional and the Parrot Bebop 2

.
The P hantom 3 Professional version that GDR has acquired has a maximum takeoff weight of 2.8 lbs

. and carries a wide field of view 4K visible camer a . The Parrot Bebop 2 is a very small UAS that has a takeoff weight of around 1 lbs

. and utilizes advanced avionics and computer controlled navigation. These drone s operate at or beyond the operational parameters of our current UAS, the DJI Inspire 1.

These drone s offer exceptional flight safety characteristics and will be operated utilizing the same safety procedures that GDR currently performs when operating the DJI Inspire 1.

GDR will comply with all of the conditions and limitations imposed in Exemption 12221 except that condition/limitation number 1 will need to be revised to include the DJI P hantom 3 Professional and the Parrot Bebop 2 UAS’s . The list of “operating documents” will also need to be revised to include operating manuals for both of these UAS ’ s . Due to file sizes, these do cuments can be provided separately or by hyperlink if requested by the FAA. Other than these revisions, there will be no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public safety that were the basis for the initial grant of exemption.

Because the req uested amendment would not set any precedent or otherwise raise any new issues, GDR respectfully requests the FAA to determine that good cause exists to grant the requested amendment by summary

means.
Sincerely,

Stephen Thomas (CEO)
#### GRESSETT v. STATE.

No. 20777.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 24, 1940.

M. L. Bennett, of Normangee, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge. '

The offense is swindling; the punishment, a fine of $25.

-The caption fails to show when the term of court at which appellant was tried commenced. This defect requires a dismissal of the appeal.

The appeal must also be dismissed because of a defective recognizance. The copy of the recognizance embraced in the transcript fails to show that appellant has been convicted of any offense. Art. 831, C. C.P., sets out the proper forth of recognizance in misdemeanor cases when an appeal is taken to the Court of Criminal Appeals.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
# C_2023086EN.01001401.xml

| 8.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/14

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10996 – ICG / SCOPELEC / SETELEN)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 86/11)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Circet SAS (‘Circet’, France), exclusively controlled by Intermediate Capital Group (‘ICG’, United Kingdom), |
| --- | --- |

—

Circet SAS (‘Circet’, France), exclusively controlled by Intermediate Capital Group (‘ICG’, United Kingdom),

| — | Scopelec, société coopérative de production anonyme à capital variable (‘Scopelec’, France), |
| --- | --- |

—

Scopelec, société coopérative de production anonyme à capital variable (‘Scopelec’, France),

| — | Setelen SAS (‘Setelen’, France), Scopelec Energies Services (‘SES’, France), Gobé SAS (‘Gobé’, France), exclusively controlled by Scopelec. |
| --- | --- |

—

Setelen SAS (‘Setelen’, France), Scopelec Energies Services (‘SES’, France), Gobé SAS (‘Gobé’, France), exclusively controlled by Scopelec.

ICG will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of several parts of Scopelec and Setelen and the whole of SES and Gobé.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of assets and shares.

2.

| — | Circet: provision of design, engineering, deployment, construction, installation and maintenance services for telecommunication networks, |
| --- | --- |

—

Circet: provision of design, engineering, deployment, construction, installation and maintenance services for telecommunication networks,

| — | Scopelec, Setelen, SES and Gobé: provision of installation and maintenance services for telecommunication networks and installation services for electric vehicle charging stations. |
| --- | --- |

—

Scopelec, Setelen, SES and Gobé: provision of installation and maintenance services for telecommunication networks and installation services for electric vehicle charging stations.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10996 – ICG / SCOPELEC / SETELEN

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---