alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 122/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.122.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 122 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5318 May 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.122.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 122

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5318 May 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 406/2010 of 26 April 2010 implementing Regulation (EC) No 79/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of hydrogen-powered motor vehicles (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 406/2010 of 26 April 2010 implementing Regulation (EC) No 79/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of hydrogen-powered motor vehicles (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### WOOD v. STATE.

No. 20249.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 1, 1939.

M. E. Lawrence, of Eastland, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*578CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is driving an automobile on a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment a fine of fifty dollars and confinement in jail for thirty days.

The recognizance for the appeal is fatally defective. It is in the form of an ordinary appearance bond. It fails to state that appellant has been convicted of a felony, and nowhere therein is appellant bound to abide the “judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas.” Art. 817, C.C.P.; Smart v. State, 116 Tex. Cr.R. 639, 32 S.W.2d 197. Appellant being enlarged upon a fatally defective recognizance, this court is without jurisdiction. Smart v. State, supra.

The appeal is dismissed.

. PER CURIAM.

. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
# Official Journal L 80/29 M

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 80 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4829 March 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 80

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4829 March 2005

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | European Parliament |
| | * | 2005/243/EC, Euratom:Final adoption of amending budget No 10 of the European Union for the 2004 financial year | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

European Parliament

*

2005/243/EC, Euratom:Final adoption of amending budget No 10 of the European Union for the 2004 financial year

1

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to the final adoption of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2005 (OJ L 60, 8.3.2005) | 95 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to the final adoption of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2005 (OJ L 60, 8.3.2005)

95

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,284,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (100,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,233,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,518,000
<PP&E>                                      19,700,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (17,562,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,656,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,253,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,382,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,933,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,656,000
<SALES>                                     15,557,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,557,000
<CGS>                                       15,254,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,874,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             270,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,840,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,840,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,840,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**THE PENN TRAFFIC COMPANY**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of The Penn Traffic Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending January 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert R. Panasuk, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Robert R. Panasuk                              

Robert R. Panasuk

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

August 16, 2007
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6576
MARTIN LEWIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus CHARLES E. THOMPSON, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-514-R) Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 28, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Martin Lewin, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probablecause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 4557 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-5798); Lewin v. Thompson , No. CA-95- 514-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 31, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
OF J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JANUARY 25, 1997, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-25-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-25-1997
<CASH>                                             131
<SECURITIES>                                     1,111
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                        77
<INVENTORY>                                      5,722
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,712
<PP&E>                                           7,715
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,088
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,966
<BONDS>                                          4,565
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        568
<COMMON>                                         1,416
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,088
<SALES>                                         22,653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,471
<CGS>                                           16,089
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   594
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   238
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    909
<INCOME-TAX>                                       344
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                565
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       565
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.25
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Brown & Brown, Inc. (Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Form 10-K), I, J. Hyatt Brown, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m or
§ 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: March 2, 2009



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ J. Hyatt Brown     
|J. Hyatt Brown         
|Chief Executive Officer



4
#### RAINS v. STATE.

No. 20496.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 14, 1939.

J. F. Mangum, of Crockett, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is driving an automobile on a public highway while intoxicated; the *670punishment, a fine of fifty dollars and confinement in jail for ninety days.

It does not appear that appellant was sentenced. The conviction being for a felony, it was incumbent upon the trial court to sentence the appellant. In the absence of sentence this court is without jurisdiction.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
# Official Journal C 265/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.265.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 265 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 549 September 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.265.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 265

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 549 September 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 265/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 265/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 265/02 | State aid — United Kingdom — State aid SA.31479 (11/C — ex 11/N) — State aid measures to Royal Mail — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1) | 2 |
| 2011/C 265/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6361 — ZF/Hansen) (1) | 19 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2011/C 265/02

State aid — United Kingdom — State aid SA.31479 (11/C — ex 11/N) — State aid measures to Royal Mail — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1)

2

2011/C 265/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6361 — ZF/Hansen) (1)

19

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2022168EN.01001001.xml

| 22.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/10

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/184/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Myanmar/Burma apply

(2022/C 168/09)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

The legal bases for this processing operation are Council Decision 2013/184/CFSP (2), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/669 (3), and Council Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 (4), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/662 (5).

The controller of this processing operation is department RELEX.1.C in the Directorate-General for External Relations (RELEX) of the General Secretariat of the Council (GSC), which can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2013/184/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2022/669 and Regulation (EU) No 401/2013, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/662

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in Decision 2013/184/CFSP and Regulation (EU) No 401/2013.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the statement of reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions pursuant to Article 25 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, the exercise of the rights of the data subjects, such as the right of access, the right to rectification and the right to object, will be governed by the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.

Personal data will be retained for five years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Without prejudice to any judicial, administrative or non-judicial remedy, data subjects may lodge a complaint with the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.

---

(1)  OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39.

(2)  OJ L 111, 23.4.2013, p. 75.

(3)  OJ L 121, 22.4.2022, p. 45.

(4)  OJ L 121, 3.5.2013, p. 1.

(5)  OJ L 121, 22.4.2022, p. 1.

---
# Official Journal L 364/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 364 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6413 October 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 364

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6413 October 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1804 of 12 October 2021 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the maximum residue level for bentazone in peas with pods (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1805 of 12 October 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of wire rod originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 14 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1804 of 12 October 2021 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the maximum residue level for bentazone in peas with pods (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1805 of 12 October 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of wire rod originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council

14

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
[No. 18955-4-III.

Division Three.

November 9, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Gavin Patrick Ritzler, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 99-1-01731-6, Linda G. Tompkins, J., entered December 2, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 23




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-116362, 333-138411 and 333-157804 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-161492 on Form S-3, of our reports dated March 4, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Tutor Perini Corporation, and the effectiveness of Tutor Perini Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tutor Perini Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010.




/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP








Los Angeles, California


March 4, 2011
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7285** 

MARLON GOODWIN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. ALVIN WILLIAM KELLER, JR. , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Di strict of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 00679

- NCT

- WWD )

Submitted : February 1 5 , 2012 Decided: February 28, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Marlon Goodwin, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Marlon Goodwin seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying relief on h is 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appeal ability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record a nd conclude that Goodwin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials befo re the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D