### 28687 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules

Controlled airspace is needed for the safety and management of IFR operations at the airport. Also, this action would update the airport name from Gary Regional Airport to Gary/ Chicago International Airport, Gary IN.

Class E airspace areas are published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9U, dated August 18, 2010 and effective September 15, 2010, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designation listed in this document would be published subsequently in the Order.

The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. It, therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘ significant regulatory action ’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘ significant rule ’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority as it would amend controlled airspace at Gary/Chicago International Airport, Gary, IN. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air). The Proposed Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: **PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR**  **TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS** 

1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 1963 Comp., p. 389.

**§ 71.1 [Amended]**

2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9U, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 18, 2010, and effective September 15, 2010, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface of the earth.
* * * * * AGL IN E5 Gary, IN [Amended] Gary/Chicago International Airport, IN

(Lat. 41 ° 36’59 ′′ N., long. 87 ° 24’46 ′′ W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.7-mile radius of Gary/Chicago International Airport, and within 2 miles each side of the 124 ° bearing from the airport extending from the 6.7-mile radius to 11.6 miles southeast of the airport.

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 11, 2011. Walter L. Tweedy, Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2011–12126 Filed 5–17–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4901–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**

**[Docket No. FAA–2011–0252; Airspace Docket No. 11–ANM–5]** 
**Proposed Modification of Class E Airspace; Newcastle, WY** 

Correction

In proposed rule document 2011– 8743 appearing on pages 20281–20282 in the issue of Tuesday, April 12, 2011, make the following correction:

**§ 71.1 [Corrected]**

On page 20282, in the second column, on the 14th line from the bottom of the
page, ‘‘ 700 feet’’ should read ‘‘ 7,000 feet’’

. [FR Doc. C1–2011–8743 Filed 5–17–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 1505–01–D DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**
**[Docket No. FAA–2011–0047; Airspace Docket No. 11–AGL–1]** 
**Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Grand Marais, MN** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

**SUMMARY :**  This action proposes to amend Class E airspace at Grand Marais, MN. Additional controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate new Standard Instrument Approach Procedures at Grand Marais/Cook County Airport. The FAA is taking this action to enhance the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport.

**DATES :**  0901 UTC. Comments must be received on or before July 5, 2011.

**ADDRESSES :**  Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001. You must identify the docket number FAA–2011– 0047/Airspace Docket No. 11–AGL–1, at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov

. You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 1–800–647–5527), is on the ground floor of the building at the above address.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Scott Enander, Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone: (817) 321– 7716.
**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Comments Invited

Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments