alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### REYMOND v. STATE.

No. 14822.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 13, 1932.

Chandler & Keith, of Stephenville, for appellant.

■ Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

• MORROW, P. J.

The offense is theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The property involved is one Wilson 81⁄8 oil well elevator and one Friek-Reed generator! According to the state’s testimony, the alleged stolen property was found in possession of the appellant.

Owen, the alleged owner, and other state’s witnesses testified to circumstances which, if believed to be true, by the jury, were sufficient to show that the property described in the indictment was stolen from Owen, and that the appellant, either alone or in company with ojie Woodfin,. committed the theft. The property,, which the state’s witnesses identified as that which had been stolen, was found in possession of the appellant. He accounted for his possession of the property by the testimony that he purchased it from one Giles, and Giles testified that he sold to the appellant some property of the same description as that -which was stolen.

*623Woodfin testified for the state, inculpating the appellant. He claimed to have acted with the appellant in committing the theft.

The only affirmative defensive issue presented by the appellant was that of alibi. Appellant requested a charge that, if the property found on his premises was purchased from,Giles, or if they had a reasonable doubt upon that subject, they should find the appellant not guilty.

State’s counsel concedes that the error is a serious one, and probably requires a reversal •of the conviction, unless rendered harmless toy the charge on alibi. The evidence pertinently raised an issue, both as to the purchase of the property as well as to the alibi. There should have been an instruction to the jury to acquit if the appellant purchased the property from Giles. See Dewees v. State, 116 Tex. Cr. R. 221, 32 S.W.(2d) 466; Dodd v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 35 S.W.(2d) 168; Wood v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 39 S.W.(2d) 1094. In thesé citations are listed many older cases.

For the reasons stated, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
#### EVANS v. MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS R. R. OF TEXAS.

No. 13978.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

Oct. 27, 1939.

Carpenter & Carpenter, of Dallas, for appellant.

Touchstone, Wight, Gormley, Strasburger & Price, of Dallas, for appellee.

BROWN, Justice.

Appellant brought suit in the Justice of the Peace Court against appellee Railroad Company for the recovery of damages on two counts. The first is for the killing of several sheep on its right-of-way, by one of appellee’s trains, and the second, for cutting down a number of valuable pecan trees growing on appellant’s land.

The case being tried to a jury, it was developed that appellant contracted with appellee Railroad Company as follows: that if appellee would furnish the materials and clear out a right-of-way for a fence, appellant would build a stock-proof fence, separating his lands from appellee’s right-of-way and property.

Appellant wanted to pasture sheep on his farm, and could not do so with the old, inadequate fence that was then in existence along the right-of-way.

Before the fence was completed by appellant, he turned in his sheep and they strolled upon the right-of-way and several were found dead. Under such circumstances the Railroad Company could not be held liable for killing the sheep, uh-less it could be shown that the Railroad Company was guilty of negligence in killing them. No effort was made to show any act of negligence.

As to the damages occasioned by cutting the pecan trees, it was shown by undisputed evidence that the clearing made for the building of the fence was about six feet wide, and that the Southwestern Bell Telephone Company maintains a line of posts and wires that run along the said right-of-way line about two to two and one-half feet beyond and outside of the Railroad Company’s right-of-way.

The evidence is meager and unsatisfactory concerning the number of pecan trees that were cut. No attempt was made to show how many of such trees were cut that were not within such an area as was reasonably necessary for the erection of the fence; nor was any attempt made to show how many such trees were cut that were not on the strip of land being used by the said Telephone Company, nor that the Telephone Company did not cut all or some of the trees. In other words, the testimony adduced was insufficient to support the giving of issues covering damages to the trees and a verdict for the plaintiff.

*916We hold that in a case of this kind, it was incumbent upon the plaintiff to adduce evidence showing how wide a strip was reasonably necessary for the building of the fence, and that the Railroad Company cut down pecan trees that were not growing upon such reasonably necessary space, and the number of such trees so destroyed. Appellant made no such proof and 'neither the court nor the jury could have found the necessary facts, under the proof m'ade.

The trial court gave the jury a peremptory instruction to find for the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed.

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3082 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3082

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
           the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  5919 Chef Menteur Highway in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ``Daryle 
                    Holloway Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DARYLE HOLLOWAY POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 5919 Chef Menteur Highway in New Orleans, Louisiana, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Daryle Holloway Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Daryle 
Holloway Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>



                                                            Exhibit (10)(n)(ii)

                                                          Exhibit A

             ADDENDUM TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
       POTLATCH CORPORATION 1995 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

Name of Employee: _______________________________________________

1. Date of Grant: _______________________________________________

2. Exercise Price: $________ per share, which is agreed to be one hundred
   percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of the common stock subject to the
   Option on the Date of Grant.

3. The number of Shares subject to this Stock Option Agreement is _____________,
   subject to adjustment as provided in Section 13 of the Plan and Paragraph 6
   of this Stock Option Agreement

4. This Option is (check one):

   __  An Incentive Stock Option

   __ A Nonqualified Stock Option

5. The Vesting Schedule for this Option is (check one):

   __ The schedule specified in Paragraph 3 of the Stock Option Agreement except
      that no exercise or call will be permitted for a fractional Share.

   __ As follows:

The document entitled Stock Option Agreement - Potlatch Corporation 1995 Stock
Incentive Plan is incorporated by this reference into this addendum.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this addendum to the
stock option agreement to be executed on its behalf by its duly authorized
representative and the Employee has executed the same on the date indicated
below.

                                   POTLATCH CORPORATION

Date:____________________        By_________________________________
                                  Vice President Employee Relations

Date:____________________        By_________________________________
                                   Employee

                                                 effective 12/05/96

                                     Page 1
# Official Journal L 134/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 134 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5025 May 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 134

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5025 May 2007

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Council |
| | | 2007/339/EC |
| | * | Decision of the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council of 25 April 2007 on the signature and provisional application of the Air Transport Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, on the one hand, and the United States of America, on the other hand | 1 |
| Air Transport Agreement | 4 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

DECISIONS

Council

2007/339/EC

*

Decision of the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council of 25 April 2007 on the signature and provisional application of the Air Transport Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, on the one hand, and the United States of America, on the other hand

1

Air Transport Agreement

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
### ATTACHMENT	A

AEROSERVICIO	PILOT	PERSONNEL

Posi t i o n N ame Mexican

Licence

Number

Capitan Lopez Pradis Rodrigo 200400443

Capitan Ramirez Hernandez Hermes 200602004

Capitan Montemayor Ramos Jesus Eduardo 201116904

Capitan Ricaño Alcazar Daniel Enrique 200501555

Capitan Marquez Zavala Jose Carlos 200103447

Capitan Onofre Sanchez Jesus Fernando 200700379

Copiloto Melendez Valdez Mario Eduardo 200201210

Copiloto Escorza Mejia Enrique 201217853

Copiloto Lopez Lopez Marco Miguel 200500275

Copiloto Palacios Becerril Luis Antonio 201118780

Copiloto Villalobos Moreno Josue 201217755

Copiloto Rito Serrano Luis Ignacio 201218760
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          80,530
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,021
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    250,718
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         481,894
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           476,256
<LOANS>                                      1,723,317
<ALLOWANCE>                                     19,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,564,845
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,078,014
<SHORT-TERM>                                   200,132
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             24,749
<LONG-TERM>                                      4,457
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,437
<OTHER-SE>                                     235,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,564,845
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 34,658
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               10,809
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    83
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                45,550
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              20,366
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,653
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           22,897
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   1
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 16,734
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,231
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,862
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,862
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.96
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,424
<LOANS-PAST>                                    12,676
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   283
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                18,152
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,668
<RECOVERIES>                                       536
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               19,170
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<CIK>                         0001013564
<NAME>                        Farm Family Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1997
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           247,807
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          9,181
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            9,456
<EQUITIES>                                     4,077
<MORTGAGE>                                     1,682
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 270,002
<CASH>                                         3,747
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             11,419
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         32,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 359,280
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                150,297
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            68,529
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 11,808
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          124,455
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                1,277
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       53
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   359,280
<PREMIUMS>                                     109,191
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            13,529
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             5,649
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 719
<BENEFITS>                                     76,421
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    30,803
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                21,610
<INCOME-TAX>                                   7,257
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            14,353
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   14,353
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  2.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.70
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 114,383
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            76,622
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (198)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             30,470
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               36,175
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                124,158
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kitcher Resources, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Raminder Badyal, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Raminder Badyal
------------------------------------
Raminder Badyal
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
June 12, 2008

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit










MoneyGram


Amendment No 7 
TO AMENDED AND RESTATED MASTER TRUST AGREEMENT


This Amendment No. 7 to the Amended and Restated Master Trust Agreement (this “Amendment No. 7”) is entered into as of the 28th day of July, 2017(the “Amendment No. 7 Effective Date”), by and between Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Walmart”) located at 702 SW 8th Street, Bentonville, Arkansas 72716, and MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc. (“MoneyGram”), a Delaware corporation with a place of business at 2828 N. Harwood, Dallas, TX 75201.


WHEREAS, Walmart and MoneyGram desire to amend the terms of Attachment B - Bill Pay Service Attachment (“Attachment B”).
    
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants of the Parties hereinafter set forth, the Parties hereto agree as follows:


		
	1.
	Definitions.  Except as otherwise indicated in the Amendment No. 7, capitalized terms used in this Amendment No. 7 have the same meanings as in the Agreement.




		
	2.
	The Parties agree to add the following subsection (iii) to Section G of Attachment B:




(iii) The BP Consumer Fee used by Walmart to conduct Bill Pay Service transactions being purchased by Walmart associates (i.e., employees) shall reflect Walmart’s discounts given such associates, up to ten percent (10%) of the BP Consumer Fee for the same Bill Payment Service transactions if being conducted by a non-Walmart associate. On a quarterly basis, MoneyGram will invoice Walmart for the total amount of discounts given to Walmart’s associates pursuant to this Section, and Walmart will pay such amount to MoneyGram within thirty (30) days of receiving the invoice. 
		
	3.
	Binding Effect. This Amendment shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and permitted assigns. 




		
	4.
	Interpretation.  In the event of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the Agreement and any other amendment or addendum thereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, the terms of this Amendment No. 7 shall control.




		
	5.
	Entire Agreement.  Each Party acknowledges and agrees that each and every provision of this Amendment No. 7, including the recitals and any “whereas” clauses, is contractual in nature and binding on the Parties.  Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment No. 7, nothing in this amendment No. 7 will modify, alter or amend any provision or term of the Agreement.






 AGREED:
	
					
	 
	MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc.
	 
	 
	Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

	 
	(MoneyGram)
	 
	 
	(Walmart)

	By:
	W. Alexander Holmes
	 
	By:
	Kirsty Ward

	Name:
	/s/ W. Alexander Holmes
	 
	Name:
	/s/ Kirsty Ward

	Title:
	Chief Executive Officer
	 
	Title:
	Vice President, Walmart Services
# C_2023185EN.01000101.xml

| 26.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 185/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11006 – ONE / MACQUARIE / YTI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 185/01)

On 4 May 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11006. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11006. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# Official Journal C 191/2023

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 191 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6631 May 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 191

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6631 May 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| 2023/C 191/01 | Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2022 financial year – European Labour Authority (ELA) | 1 |
| 2023/C 191/02 | Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) – amending budget No 1 | 7 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

2023/C 191/01

Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2022 financial year – European Labour Authority (ELA)

1

2023/C 191/02

Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) – amending budget No 1

7

---

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN