alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit






		
	ITEM 5.
	OTHER INFORMATION




To enhance retention and align with market practice, on November 1, 2017, the Company entered into executive change of control severance agreements (the “agreements”) with its executive officers, including the named executive officers identified in the Company’s proxy statement (other than Soren Schroder, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, whose existing employment agreement contains a change of control provision). 
The agreements, which reflect a double trigger change of control provision, provide for cash severance benefits if the executive’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by the individual for “good reason,” in each case before the second anniversary of a “change of control” of the Company, as those terms are defined in the agreements.  The agreements provide that, upon a qualifying termination, the executive would be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to (i) 24 months of the executive’s base salary in effect immediately prior to the termination date, and (ii) an amount equal to two times the executive’s annual target bonus for the year in which the termination occurs.  
In addition, the executive will be entitled to receive accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards, with any stock options remaining exercisable for the remainder of their full term, and with unvested performance-based equity awards deemed vested at the greater of (i) actual performance or (ii) target levels with respect to performance goals or other vesting criteria.
The agreements provide that the Company’s obligations to pay severance benefits under the agreements is subject to the execution by the executive of a general release of claims against the Company and contain an 18-month non-competition covenant.  The agreements do not provide for a tax gross-up.
The foregoing is a summary of the terms of the change of control agreements and does not purport to be complete. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the form of change of control agreement filed as an exhibit to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 21

- 2430

_____________________________
J EREMIE O. P ETERS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Holmes County

. Timothy Register , Judge

. September 9, 2022

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , O STERHAUS , and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Kerry Adkison of Kerry Adkison, P.A., Chipley
, for Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Robert "Charlie" Lee, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Order entered March 25 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 00778
- CV D. REGINALD STOVER, JACE HARKEY, ROBERT H. HOLMES , AND THE HOLMES LAW F IRM, INC., Appellant s V. ADM MILLING CO., Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 13
- 13400



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee ADM Milling Co.’s March 6, 2019 notice that the bankruptcy court has lift ed the a utomatic stay in the bankruptcy proceeding

. The Court construes ADM Milling’s notice as a motion to reinstate the appea l. S ee T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.3(a)

. Attached to ADM Milling’ s filing is a copy of the bankruptcy court’s March 4, 2019 agreed order granting
D . Reginald Stover’s nunc pro tunc motion for relief from the automatic stay to proceed with this appeal. That order lifted the automatic stay “ as of the [ bankruptcy ] P etition D ate , ” April 2, 2018,
and with respect to this appeal, states it : (i) permit [s] [ Stover] and ADM [ Milling] to continue to conclusion that certain appellate proceeding in the Court of Appeals , Fifth District of Texas at Dallas (the

“ Appellate Court ” ), styled as D. Regi nald Stover, Jace H a rkey, Robert H. Holmes, and The Holmes Law Firm, Inc., Appellants v. ADM Milling Co.,Appellee , No. 05

- 17

- 00778

- CV (the “ Appeal ”), and (ii) authorize[s] the Appellate

Court to finalize the Appeal. The Court REINSTATES this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8

.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
# C_2023291EN.01000401.xml

| 18.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 291/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 291/4

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.101579

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 291/03)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 14.7.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.101579 |
| Member State | Czechia |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Development of rail sidings |
| Legal basis | Act No. 266/1994 Coll., on rail systems, as amended Act No. 104/2000 Coll., on the State Fund for Transport Infrastructure, as amended Act No. 218/2000 Coll., on budgetary rules, as amended Decree No. 560/2006 Coll., on the participation of the state budget in the financing of property reproduction programmes, as amended Operational Programme Transport 2021 — 2027 — officially approved by the EC on 8 July 2022 the Transport Programme 2021-2027 under the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, approved by Resolution of the Government of the Czech Republic No. 984 of 5 November 2021 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Coordination of transport |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 1 800 000 000 CZK
  Annual budget: 300 000 000 CZK |
| Intensity | 49,0  % |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2027 |
| Economic sectors | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministry of Transport |
| nábřeží L. Svobody 1222/12, 110 15 Praha 1 |

Date of adoption of the decision

14.7.2023

Aid number

SA.101579

Member State

Czechia

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Development of rail sidings

Legal basis

Act No. 266/1994 Coll., on rail systems, as amended Act No. 104/2000 Coll., on the State Fund for Transport Infrastructure, as amended Act No. 218/2000 Coll., on budgetary rules, as amended Decree No. 560/2006 Coll., on the participation of the state budget in the financing of property reproduction programmes, as amended Operational Programme Transport 2021 — 2027 — officially approved by the EC on 8 July 2022 the Transport Programme 2021-2027 under the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, approved by Resolution of the Government of the Czech Republic No. 984 of 5 November 2021

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Coordination of transport

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 1 800 000 000 CZK

Annual budget: 300 000 000 CZK

Intensity

49,0  %

Duration

Until 31.12.2027

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministry of Transport

nábřeží L. Svobody 1222/12, 110 15 Praha 1

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA

---
EX-4.4



 Exhibit 4.4 

CONSENT OF TD SECURITIES INC. 

We refer to the Fairness Opinion (the “Fairness Opinion”) dated October 1, 2017, which we prepared for the special committee of
the board of directors of The Jean Coutu Group (PJC) Inc. (the “Company”) in connection with the amalgamation between the Company and Metro Subco (as defined in the Information Circular). We consent to the inclusion of the Fairness Opinion
in the Information Circular, dated October 26, 2017, which in turn is included in the Registration Statement on Form F-8 of METRO Inc., dated the date hereof (the “Registration Statement”) and filed with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We also consent to the inclusion of our firm name in the Information Circular. In giving such consent, we do not admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required under
Section 7 of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), or the rules and regulations adopted by the SEC thereunder, nor do we admit that we are experts with respect to any part of the Registration Statement within the
meaning of the term “experts” as used in the Act or the rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder. 
  

	
	 TD Securities Inc.

	
	 By: /s/ David Duncan

	 Name: David Duncan

	 Title:   Managing Director

	 Toronto, Ontario

	 October 30, 2017
#### McCRACKEN v. STATE.

No. 16411.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 21, 1934.

Patterson & Lobdeli, of Decatur, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for aggravated assault; the punishment being a fine of $150.

Appellant was put to trial on an indictment which charged him with an assault with intent to murder one Forrest Crown-over. The present conviction resulted.

People were gathered at and near a church on Sunday night. A difficulty arose between appellant and his son (Willie McCracken) on the one side, and Forrest Crownover and his brother, Jim, on the other. While Willie and Forrest were fighting,' appellant drew from his car a shotgun, which other parties took away from him. Willie hit Forrest on the head with a piece of iron and ran away.- Forrest pursued and caught him and knocked him down. While Forrest, with his fists, was striking Willie, the latter called to his father (appellant) for help. Appellant started to where they were down ‘on the ground in the road fighting, when Jim tried to stop him. Appellant cut Jim and then went to where the boys were fighting and stabbed Forrest in the back ■ with a knife. It was in evidence that on Saturday before the difficulty on Sunday night, appellant had said he was going to see his son Willie whip Marshall Steele, and that he (appellant) was going to see that the Crownorers did not interfere. The Crownovers and Steele had been told of this statement made by appellant. Steele was present when the trouble occurred, but seems not to have been actively involved in it.

In the motion for a new trial a number of objections to the court's charge were urged, but the record fails to show that objections, written or otherwise, were made at the time of the trial.

The motion for a new trial was based in part on claimed newly discovered evidence, and the affidavits of the named witnesses are attached to the motion. The court heard evidence upon the matter when the motion was presented, and, in overruling the same, says in substance that what the claimed new witnesses knew appellant also knew; that the application for a continuance showed that appellant knew about the witnesses and that with reasonable diligence their presence could have been secured at the trial. The action of the court in overruling the motion was based on his finding that the evidence of the proposed witnesses was not newly discovered. The court had before him at the time the application for a continuance to which -he referred. It is not in the record. We must assume that the court was justi-*501fled in Ms conclusions from the recitals in the application for continuance.

No hills of exception are brought forward complaining of the action of the court in denying the continuance or complaining of any •other matter occurring during the trial.

The judgment is affirmed.
No. 72-5928.

#### McMurray *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Jud. Dist. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2758 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2758

 To amend title 36, United States Code, to provide for the display of 
    the National League of Families POW/MIA flag at the World War I 
                               Memorials.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2018

  Mrs. McCaskill (for herself and Mr. Blunt) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 36, United States Code, to provide for the display of 
    the National League of Families POW/MIA flag at the World War I 
                               Memorials.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPLAY OF NATIONAL LEAGUE OF FAMILIES POW/MIA FLAG AT THE 
              WORLD WAR I MEMORIALS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (d)(3) of section 902 of title 36, 
United States Code, is amended by striking ``The World War II 
Memorial,'' and inserting ``The World War I Memorials, the World War II 
Memorial,''.
    (b) Days for Display.--Subsection (c)(2)(A) of such section is 
amended by inserting ``the World War I Memorials,'' before ``the World 
War II Memorial,''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements contained in the Form 10-Q for the three months ended
March 31, 2000 for Aetna Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            30,645
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                              127
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       1,774
<MORTGAGE>                                       3,181
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      485
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  40,511
<CASH>                                           3,314
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               3,870
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           2,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,979
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 23,779
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                528
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   4,895
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           15,290
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  4,230
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,626
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,979
<PREMIUMS>                                       6,394
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                787
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 (3)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     713
<BENEFITS>                                       5,883
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                         59
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    296
<INCOME-TAX>                                       126
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                169
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       169
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.19
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          41,362
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  515,220
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (21,625)
<INVENTORY>                                    766,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,335,885
<PP&E>                                         820,790
<DEPRECIATION>                               (282,692)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,038,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          778,807
<BONDS>                                     15,675,036
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,167
<COMMON>                                           240
<OTHER-SE>                                (14,418,354)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,038,896
<SALES>                                      2,602,387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,602,387
<CGS>                                        3,706,823
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,706,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,370,159
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,767,947
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,242,542)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,242,542)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                406,525
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,649,067)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.62)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Joseph F. Coradino, the Chief Executive Officer of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


(1) the Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K/A”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:March 25, 2014/s/ Joseph F. CoradinoName:Joseph F. CoradinoTitle:Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 19, 2019

NO. 03-19-00062-CV

Mijiza Parker, Appellant

v.

Breckenridge Property Fund 2016, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on January 10, 2019. Having 

reviewed the record, the Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted her appeal and did not 

comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for

want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of 

costs is made.
CERTIFICATE

             AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE OF THE POTLATCH CORPORATION
            SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED
                        EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1989)


     Whereas this Corporation, by resolution adopted by its Board of 
Directors effective May 5, 1989, authorized the Vice President-Employee
Relations of this Corporation to adopt non-substantive changes to benefit
plans established and maintained by this Corporation if those changes do
not have a material financial impact on such plans or the Corporation; and

     Whereas it is deemed necessary and desirable to amend the Potlatch
Corporation Supplemental Benefit Plan (the "Plan") to make certain non-
substantive changes.

     Now, Therefore, be it

     Resolved that effective as of January 1, 1998, Section 4(c) of the 
Potlatch Corporation Salaried Employees' Supplemental Benefit Plan shall
be amended to delete the last sentence thereof and to replace it in its
entirety by the following:

            If the vested amount credited to a Participant's Savings Plan
     Supplemental Benefit account, which is established after December 31,
     1996, is less than $1,000 on the third anniversary of the establishment
     of such account, such benefit will be paid to the Participant in a 
     single lump sum as soon as practicable after the third anniversary of
     the establishment of such account. 


                                         POTLATCH CORPORATION

         September 15, 1998              By: Barbara M. Failing
               Date                         Vice President-Employee Relations 


                                                           Exhibit (10)(d)(i)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Richard Beyer, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I, Ltd., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 2, 2010 (the Quarterly Report), which this statement accompanies fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Freescale Semiconductor
Holdings I, Ltd.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.

Dated: April 23, 2010



/s/ RICHARD BEYERRichard BeyerChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I, Ltd.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LEIGHTON A. LEE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-1226

[October 12, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Geoffrey D. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

15002403CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D. 

Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.