##### Table of Contents

---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---



FORM 10-Q



---



|x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



For the quarterly period ended June 27, 2004



or



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



For the transition period from  to



Commission file number 0-5260



---



REMEDYTEMP, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)



---



|                                                               |  |                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|California                                                     |  | 95-2890471                          
|(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)



|                                         |  |           
|---------------------------------------- |  | ----------
|101 Enterprise Aliso Viejo, California   |  | 92656     
|(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |  | (Zip Code)



Registrants
Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (949) 425-7600



---



Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.    Yes   x    No ̈



Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes ̈No  x



As of August 5, 2004 there were
8,768,871 of Class A Common Stock and 800,312 shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding.



---



---

##### Table of Contents



INDEX



|                             |  |         |  |                                                                                                                              |  |         
|---------------------------- |  | ------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------
|                             |  |         |  |                                                                                                                              |  | Page No.
|PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION |  |        
|                             |  |         | 
|                             |  | Item 1. |  | Financial Statements                                                                                                         |  |         
|                             |  |         | 
|                             |  |         |  | Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 27, 2004 (unaudited) and September 28, 2003                                           |  | 3       
|                             |  |         | 
|                             |  |         |  | Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine fiscal months ended June 27, 2004 and June 29, 2003 (unaudited) |  | 4       
|                             |  |         | 
|                             |  |         |  | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine fiscal months ended June 27, 2004 and June 29, 2003 (unaudited)           |  | 5       
|                             |  |         | 
|                             |  |         |  | Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)                                                             |  | 6       
|                             |  |         | 
|                             |  | Item 2. |  | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations                                        |  | 15      
|                             |  |         | 
|                             |  | Item 3. |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk                                                                   |  | 28      
|                             |  |         | 
|                             |  | Item 4. |  | Controls and Procedures                                                                                                      |  | 28      
|                             | 
|PART IIOTHER INFORMATION    |  |        
|                             |  |         | 
|                             |  | Item 1. |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                                                            |  | 29      
|                             |  |         | 
|                             |  | Item 2. |  | Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities                                             |  | *       
|                             |  |         | 
|                             |  | Item 3. |  | Defaults Upon Senior Securities                                                                                              |  | *       
|                             |  |         | 
|                             |  | Item 4. |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                                                          |  | *       
|                             |  |         | 
|                             |  | Item 5. |  | Other Information                                                                                                            |  | *       
|                             |  |         | 
|                             |  | Item 6. |  | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K                                                                                             |  | 31      
|                             | 
|SIGNATURES                   |  | 33     

---

|* | No information provided due to inapplicability of item.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------



---

##### Table of Contents

Remedy Temp, Inc.



PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION



ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)





|                                                                                                                                                                           |  |                          |         |   |                   |   |         |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ------- | - | ----------------- | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                                                                                                           |  | (unaudited) June 27,2004 |         |   | September 28,2003 |  
|                                                                                                                                                                           |  |                         
|ASSETS                                                                                                                                                                     |  |                          |         |   |                   |   |         |  
|Current assets:                                                                                                                                                            |  |                          |         |   |                   |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                                                                                  |  | $                        | 5,064   |   |                   | $ | 13,236  |  
|Investments                                                                                                                                                                |  |                          | 4,820   |   |                   |   | 15,730  |  
|Restricted investments                                                                                                                                                     |  |                          | 3,123   |   |                   |   | 2,654   |  
|Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,639 and $2,627, respectively                                                                             |  |                          | 54,983  |   |                   |   | 60,594  |  
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets                                                                                                                                  |  |                          | 8,557   |   |                   |   | 6,679   |  
|Deferred and current income taxes                                                                                                                                          |  |                          | 643     |   |                   |   | 330     |  
|                                                                                                                                                                           |  |                          |         |   |                   |   |         |  
|Total current assets                                                                                                                                                       |  |                          | 77,190  |   |                   |   | 99,223  |  
|Fixed assets, net                                                                                                                                                          |  |                          | 9,780   |   |                   |   | 12,337  |  
|Restricted cash and investments                                                                                                                                            |  |                          | 37,931  |   |                   |   | 21,615  |  
|Other assets                                                                                                                                                               |  |                          | 394     |   |                   |   | 1,334   |  
|Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $563 and $219, respectively                                                                                          |  |                          | 2,411   |   |                   |   | 1,655   |  
|Goodwill                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                          | 3,403   |   |                   |   | 3,030   |  
|                                                                                                                                                                           |  |                          |         |   |                   |   |         |  
|Total Assets                                                                                                                                                               |  | $                        | 131,109 |   |                   | $ | 139,194 |  
|                                                                                                                                                                           |  |                          |         |   |                   |   |         |  
|LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY                                                                                                                                       |  |                          |         |   |                   |   |         |  
|Current liabilities:                                                                                                                                                       |  |                          |         |   |                   |   |         |  
|Accounts payable                                                                                                                                                           |  | $                        | 1,761   |   |                   | $ | 4,790   |  
|Accrued workers compensation, current portion (Note 10)                                                                                                                   |  |                          | 17,509  |   |                   |   | 15,263  |  
|Accrued payroll, benefits and related costs                                                                                                                                |  |                          | 16,338  |   |                   |   | 17,530  |  
|Accrued licensees share of gross profit                                                                                                                                   |  |                          | 2,138   |   |                   |   | 2,231   |  
|Other accrued expenses                                                                                                                                                     |  |                          | 3,611   |   |                   |   | 3,335   |  
|                                                                                                                                                                           |  |                          |         |   |                   |   |         |  
|Total current liabilities                                                                                                                                                  |  |                          | 41,357  |   |                   |   | 43,149  |  
|Accrued workers compensation, non-current portion (Note 10)                                                                                                               |  |                          | 22,681  |   |                   |   | 20,681  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                           |  |                          |         |   |                   |   |         |  
|Total liabilities                                                                                                                                                          |  |                          | 64,038  |   |                   |   | 63,830  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                           |  |                         
|Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 2)                                                                                                                            |  |                          |         |   |                   |   |         |  
|                                                                                                                                                                           |  |                         
|Shareholders equity:                                                                                                                                                      |  |                          |         |   |                   |   |         |  
|Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 5,000 shares; none outstanding                                                                                                |  |                          |        |   |                   |   |        |  
|Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 50,000 shares; 8,769 shares issued and outstanding at June 27, 2004 and September 28,
2003                               |  |                          | 88      |   |                   |   | 88      |  
|Class B Non-Voting Common Stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 4,530 shares; 800 and 894 shares issued and outstanding at June 27, 2004 and
September 28, 2003, respectively |  |                          | 8       |   |                   |   | 9       |  
|Additional paid-in capital                                                                                                                                                 |  |                          | 41,450  |   |                   |   | 42,674  |  
|Unearned compensation                                                                                                                                                      |  |                          | (4,076  | ) |                   |   | (6,031  | )
|Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income                                                                                                                              |  |                          | (240    | ) |                   |   | 134     |  
|Retained earnings                                                                                                                                                          |  |                          | 29,841  |   |                   |   | 38,490  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                           |  |                          |         |   |                   |   |         |  
|Total shareholders equity                                                                                                                                                 |  |                          | 67,071  |   |                   |   | 75,364  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                           |  |                          |         |   |                   |   |         |  
|Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity                                                                                                                                 |  | $                        | 131,109 |   |                   | $ | 139,194 |  
|                                                                                                                                                                           |  |                          |         |   |                   |   |         |  



See accompanying notes
to consolidated financial statements.



3



---

##### Table of Contents

Remedy Temp, Inc.



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)



(unaudited)



|                                                                                          |  |                    |         |   |                   |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |         |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | ------- | - | ----------------- | - | ------- | ------------ |  | - | ------------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                          |  | Three Months Ended |         |   | Nine Months Ended |  
|                                                                                          |  | June 27,2004       |         |   | June 29,2003      |   |         | June 27,2004 |  |   | June 29, 2003 |  
|Company-owned office revenues                                                             |  | $                  | 85,537  |   |                   | $ | 74,135  |              |  | $ | 243,153       |   |  | $ | 217,703 |  
|Licensed franchise revenues                                                               |  |                    | 43,378  |   |                   |   | 44,361  |              |  |   | 126,367       |   |  |   | 136,494 |  
|Franchise royalties                                                                       |  |                    | 335     |   |                   |   | 337     |              |  |   | 1,110         |   |  |   | 1,253   |  
|Initial franchise fees                                                                    |  |                    |        |   |                   |   | 5       |              |  |   | 16            |   |  |   | 17      |  
|                                                                                          |  |                    |         |   |                   |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |         |  
|Total revenues                                                                            |  |                    | 129,250 |   |                   |   | 118,838 |              |  |   | 370,646       |   |  |   | 355,467 |  
|Cost of Company-owned office revenues                                                     |  |                    | 70,867  |   |                   |   | 62,122  |              |  |   | 206,014       |   |  |   | 184,680 |  
|Cost of licensed franchise revenues                                                       |  |                    | 34,605  |   |                   |   | 35,279  |              |  |   | 101,092       |   |  |   | 108,771 |  
|Licensees share of gross profit                                                          |  |                    | 5,900   |   |                   |   | 6,002   |              |  |   | 17,044        |   |  |   | 18,363  |  
|Selling and administrative expenses                                                       |  |                    | 18,115  |   |                   |   | 16,327  |              |  |   | 51,191        |   |  |   | 47,841  |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                             |  |                    | 1,253   |   |                   |   | 1,547   |              |  |   | 4,515         |   |  |   | 4,052   |  
|                                                                                          |  |                    |         |   |                   |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |         |  
|Loss from operations                                                                      |  |                    | (1,490  | ) |                   |   | (2,439  | )            |  |   | (9,210        | ) |  |   | (8,240  | )
|Other income (expense):                                                                   |  |                    |         |   |                   |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |         |  
|Interest expense                                                                          |  |                    | (102    | ) |                   |   | (97     | )            |  |   | (308          | ) |  |   | (294    | )
|Interest income                                                                           |  |                    | 244     |   |                   |   | 232     |              |  |   | 781           |   |  |   | 831     |  
|Other, net                                                                                |  |                    | 146     |   |                   |   | 158     |              |  |   | 521           |   |  |   | 532     |  
|                                                                                          |  |                    |         |   |                   |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |         |  
|Loss before income taxes                                                                  |  |                    | (1,202  | ) |                   |   | (2,146  | )            |  |   | (8,216        | ) |  |   | (7,171  | )
|Provision for (benefit from) income taxes                                                 |  |                    | 106     |   |                   |   | (1,711  | )            |  |   | 433           |   |  |   | (4,374  | )
|                                                                                          |  |                    |         |   |                   |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |         |  
|Loss before cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard                    |  |                    | (1,308  | ) |                   |   | (435    | )            |  |   | (8,649        | ) |  |   | (2,797  | )
|Cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard, net of income taxes of $1,634 |  |                    |        |   |                   |   |        |              |  |   |              |   |  |   | (2,421  | )
|                                                                                          |  |                    |         |   |                   |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |         |  
|Net loss                                                                                  |  | $                  | (1,308  | ) |                   | $ | (435    | )            |  | $ | (8,649        | ) |  | $ | (5,218  | )
|                                                                                          |  |                    |         |   |                   |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |         |  
|Earnings per share  basic and diluted:                                                   |  |                    |         |   |                   |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |         |  
|                                                                                          |  |                    |         |   |                   |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |         |  
|Loss before cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard                    |  | $                  | (0.14   | ) |                   | $ | (0.05   | )            |  | $ | (0.96         | ) |  | $ | (0.31   | )
|Cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard, net of incomes taxes          |  |                    |        |   |                   |   |        |              |  |   |              |   |  |   | (0.27   | )
|                                                                                          |  |                    |         |   |                   |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |         |  
|Net loss  basic and diluted                                                              |  | $                  | (0.14   | ) |                   | $ | (0.05   | )            |  | $ | (0.96         | ) |  | $ | (0.58   | )
|                                                                                          |  |                    |         |   |                   |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |         |  
|Weighted average shares:                                                                  |  |                    |         |   |                   |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |         |  
|                                                                                          |  |                    |         |   |                   |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |         |  
|Basic and diluted                                                                         |  |                    | 9,024   |   |                   |   | 9,048   |              |  |   | 9,021         |   |  |   | 9,042   |  
|                                                                                          |  |                    |         |   |                   |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |         |  



See accompanying notes
to consolidated financial statements.



4



---

##### Table of Contents

Remedy Temp, Inc.



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(amounts in thousands)



(unaudited)



|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |               |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------- | - | ------------- | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                |  | Nine Months Ended |        
|                                                                                |  | June 27,2004      |         |   | June 29, 2003 |  
|Cash flows from operating activities:                                           |  |                   |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Net loss                                                                        |  | $                 | (8,649  | ) |               | $ | (5,218  | )
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from operating activities:        |  |                   |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard, net of income taxes |  |                   |        |   |               |   | 2,421   |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                   |  |                   | 4,515   |   |               |   | 4,052   |  
|Provision for losses on accounts receivable                                     |  |                   | 720     |   |               |   | 1,142   |  
|Restricted stock compensation expense                                           |  |                   | 609     |   |               |   | 935     |  
|Changes in assets and liabilities:                                              |  |                   |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Trading investments                                                             |  |                   | (469    | ) |               |   | (634    | )
|Accounts receivable                                                             |  |                   | 4,897   |   |               |   | 5,092   |  
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets                                       |  |                   | (2,172  | ) |               |   | 890     |  
|Other assets                                                                    |  |                   | 940     |   |               |   | 333     |  
|Accounts payable                                                                |  |                   | (3,059  | ) |               |   | 3,035   |  
|Accrued workers compensation                                                   |  |                   | 4,245   |   |               |   | 4,458   |  
|Accrued payroll, benefits and related costs                                     |  |                   | (1,192  | ) |               |   | 786     |  
|Accrued licensees share of gross profit                                        |  |                   | (94     | ) |               |   | (733    | )
|Other accrued expenses                                                          |  |                   | 270     |   |               |   | (887    | )
|Prepaid income taxes                                                            |  |                   | (314    | ) |               |   | (5,049  | )
|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                       |  |                   | 247     |   |               |   | 10,623  |  
|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Cash flows from investing activities:                                           |  |                   |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Purchase of fixed assets                                                        |  |                   | (1,321  | ) |               |   | (2,108  | )
|Purchase of available-for-sale investments                                      |  |                   | (430    | ) |               |   | (23,959 | )
|Proceeds from maturity of available-for-sale investments                        |  |                   | 10,999  |   |               |   | 15,000  |  
|Restricted cash and investments                                                 |  |                   | (16,316 | ) |               |   | (6,929  | )
|Acquisition of franchises                                                       |  |                   | (1,443  | ) |               |   | (3,828  | )
|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Net cash used in investing activities                                           |  |                   | (8,511  | ) |               |   | (21,824 | )
|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Cash flows from financing activities:                                           |  |                   |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Proceeds from stock option activity                                             |  |                   | 8       |   |               |   |        |  
|Proceeds from Employee Stock Purchase Plan activity                             |  |                   | 113     |   |               |   | 112     |  
|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Net cash provided by financing activities                                       |  |                   | 121     |   |               |   | 112     |  
|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Effect of exchange rate changes in cash                                         |  |                   | (29     | ) |               |   |        |  
|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                                       |  |                   | (8,172  | ) |               |   | (11,089 | )
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                                |  |                   | 13,236  |   |               |   | 26,101  |  
|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                                      |  | $                 | 5,064   |   |               | $ | 15,012  |  
|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |               |   |         |  



See accompanying notes
to consolidated financial statements.



5



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)



1. Basis of Presentation



The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of RemedyTemp,
Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively referred to herein as the Company or Remedy). These financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contain all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly
state the financial position of the Company as of June 27, 2004, and its results of operations and cash flows for the thirty-nine weeks ended June 27, 2004 and June 29, 2003. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. As permitted under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC, these financial statements do not include all disclosures and footnotes normally included with annual Consolidated Financial Statements and,
accordingly, should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements, and the notes thereto, included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on December 29, 2003 for the year ended September 28, 2003.
The results of operations for the nine fiscal months ended June 27, 2004 may not be indicative of the results of operations that can be expected for the full year.



Fiscal quarter



The Companys fiscal quarters include 13 or 14 weeks. The third fiscal quarter of fiscal 2004 and 2003 included 13
weeks. The fourth fiscal quarter of fiscal 2004 includes 14 weeks and will end October 3, 2004.



2. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities



Litigation



Class Action



On October 16, 2001, GLF Holding Company, Inc. and Fredrick S. Pallas filed
a Complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, against RemedyTemp, Inc., Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc., Remedy Temporary Services, Inc., Karin Somogyi, Paul W. Mikos, and Greg Palmer. The Complaint purports
to be a class action brought by the individual plaintiffs on behalf of all of the Companys franchisees. The Complaint alleges claims for fraud and deceit, negligent misrepresentation, negligence, breach of contract, breach of warranty,
conversion, an accounting, unfair and deceptive practices, restitution and equitable relief. On or about December 3, 2002, plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint alleging these same causes of action, but adding additional facts to the Complaint
particularly with respect to the Companys workers compensation program and adding claims regarding unfair competition on behalf of the general public in addition to their existing class action claim. The plaintiffs claim that Remedy
wrongfully induced its franchisees into signing franchise agreements and took other action that caused the franchisees damage.



The Company believes that plaintiffs claims fall within the arbitration clause contained in the franchise agreements signed by plaintiffs. As a
result, immediately after plaintiffs filed suit, the Company filed arbitration demands against plaintiffs with the American Arbitration Association. On or about April 1, 2003, the Company amended its arbitration demands to add claims against
plaintiffs relating to workers compensation.



The Company
denies and continues to deny the allegations in the Complaint. There has been no finding of wrongdoing by the Company. Nevertheless, to avoid costly, disruptive, and time-consuming litigation, and without admitting any wrongdoing or liability, the
Company negotiated and agreed to a settlement with plaintiffs and stipulated to the certification of a settlement class comprised of all individuals or entities that entered into a Franchise Agreement (including renewals or amendments thereof) with
RemedyTemp, Inc. and/or Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc. anytime prior to March 29, 2004.



On April 6, 2004, the Court preliminarily approved the parties settlement agreement and conditionally certified the Settlement Class. All discovery and other proceedings in this action are stayed, except as may
be necessary to implement the Settlement Agreement. A hearing on final approval of the settlement is set for September 9, 2004. As of June 27, 2004, the maximum exposure is deemed immaterial to the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.



6



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(amounts in thousands, except per share
amounts)



CIGA



In early 2002, as a result of the liquidation of Remedys former
workers compensation insurance carrier, Reliance National Insurance Company (Reliance), the California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) began making efforts to join some of the Companys customers and their
workers compensation insurance carriers (collectively, Customers), in pending workers compensation claims filed by Remedy employees. At the time of these injuries, from July 22, 1997 through March 31, 2001, Remedy was covered
by workers compensation policies issued by Reliance. The Company believes that, under California law, CIGA is responsible for Reliances outstanding liabilities. On April 5, 2002, the California Workers Compensation Appeals Board
(WCAB), at Remedys request, consolidated the various workers compensation claims in which CIGA sought to join Remedys Customers, and agreed to stay proceedings on those claims pending resolution of the issue of
CIGAs obligations to satisfy Reliances obligations to Remedys employees. The WCAB selected a single test case from the consolidated pending cases in which to decide whether CIGA is responsible for the claims of Remedys
employees, or can shift such responsibility to the Customers. The trial occurred on September 20, 2002. The WCAB Administrative Law Judge ruled in favor of CIGA, thus allowing the pending workers compensation matters to proceed against the
Customers. Remedy then filed a motion for reconsideration of the Administrative Law Judges decision by the entire WCAB. On March 28, 2003, the WCAB, en banc, affirmed the ruling of the Administrative Law Judge. Thereafter, in May 2003, the
Company filed a petition for writ of review of the WCABs decision in the California Court of Appeal. The WCAB continued the stay in effect since April 5, 2002, thus preventing CIGA from proceeding until the writ proceeding is
concluded. In January 2004, the Court of Appeal granted the Companys petition and undertook to review the WCABs decision; the Court heard oral argument in the matter on July 9, 2004 and a decision is pending.



Despite the Companys determination to pursue the review process, there
can be no assurance that the current proceeding will be successful, that further judicial review will be granted in the event of an adverse result, or that the Company will ultimately succeed in overturning the WCABs decision. In the event of
an unfavorable outcome, Remedy may be obligated to reimburse certain clients and believes that it would consider reimbursement of other clients for actual losses incurred as a result of an unfavorable ruling in this matter. If CIGA is permitted to
join Remedys Customers, thus triggering the clients insurance carriers obligation to respond to the claims of Remedys employees, the exposure to Remedy becomes a function of the ultimate losses on the claims and the impact of
such claims, if any, on the clients insurance coverage, including the clients responsibility for any deductibles or retentions under their own workers compensation insurance. Presently, the Company is unable to ascertain the
specific details regarding the insurance coverage of its affected clients or the impact of an unfavorable ruling on such coverage. The Company has received data from the trustee for Reliance regarding outstanding claims that CIGA has attempted to
pursue against the Companys current and former clients. The information indicates that incurred losses, as of June 27, 2004, for the claims in question amount to at least $40,000. The losses incurred to date represent amounts paid to date by
the trustee and the remaining claim reserves on open files. At this time, the Company believes that it is unable to ascertain if the remaining reserves on the claims are appropriate or adequate, since the Company has not been able to gain access to
the files due to pending litigation. Further, as stated above, the Company (i) cautions that it believes the Companys exposure in this matter is not the remaining claims liability, but rather a function of the impact of such claims, if any, on
the clients insurance costs; and (ii) expects to ultimately prevail in this matter and that it will suffer no loss.



Other Litigation



From time to time, the Company becomes a party to other litigation incidental to its business and operations. The Company maintains insurance coverage
that management believes is reasonable and prudent for the business risks that the Company faces. Based on current available information, management does not believe the Company is party to any legal proceedings that are likely to have a material
adverse effect on its business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.



Other Contingency



On
November 18, 2003, the Company was notified by the State of California Employment Development Department (the EDD) that the Company allegedly underpaid its state unemployment insurance by approximately $2,000 for the period January 1,
2003 through September 30, 2003. Based on preliminary evaluations and on advice of its outside counsel, the Company believes that its methodology in calculating its state unemployment insurance is in compliance with all applicable laws and
regulations. The Company is currently working with outside counsel to resolve this issue. Given the preliminary stage of this matter, no amount has been accrued as of June 27, 2004. The EDD audit is ongoing as of June 27, 2004.



7



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(amounts in thousands, except per share
amounts)



3. Earnings Per Share



Basic earnings per share (EPS) is calculated using net loss
divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is calculated similar to basic EPS except that the weighted average number of common shares is increased to include the number of additional common
shares that would have been outstanding if the potential dilutive common shares, such as options, had been issued and restricted shares had vested.



Potential common shares (including applicable outstanding options, restricted shares and shares in trust of 1,293 and 1,404 for the three fiscal months
ended June 27, 2004 and June 29, 2003, and 1,298 and 1,197, for the nine fiscal months then ended, respectively) have been excluded from the calculation of diluted shares because the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.



4. Stock-based Incentive Compensation



The Company follows the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation  Transition and Disclosure, and, accordingly, accounts for
its stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method under APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations.



The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share had compensation expense for the employee
stock-based plans been recorded based on the fair value method using the Black-Scholes option pricing model under SFAS No. 123, as amended:



|                                                                                                                             |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |       |               |  |   |               |   |  |   |        |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ------ | - | ------------------------- | - | ----- | ------------- |  | - | ------------- | - |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                                                                                             |  | For the Three Months Ended |        |   | For the Nine Months Ended |  
|                                                                                                                             |  | June 27, 2004              |        |   | June 29, 2003             |   |       | June 27, 2004 |  |   | June 29, 2003 |  
|Net loss, as reported                                                                                                        |  | $                          | (1,308 | ) |                           | $ | (435  | )             |  | $ | (8,649        | ) |  | $ | (5,218 | )
|Deduct: total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method, net of related tax effects |  |                            | (121   | ) |                           |   | (110  | )             |  |   | (354          | ) |  |   | (314   | )
|                                                                                                                             |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |       |               |  |   |               |   |  |   |        |  
|Net loss, as adjusted                                                                                                        |  | $                          | (1,429 | ) |                           | $ | (545  | )             |  | $ | (9,003        | ) |  | $ | (5,532 | )
|                                                                                                                             |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |       |               |  |   |               |   |  |   |        |  
|Basic and diluted net loss per share:                                                                                        |  |                            |        |   |                           |   |       |               |  |   |               |   |  |   |        |  
|As reported                                                                                                                  |  | $                          | (0.14  | ) |                           | $ | (0.05 | )             |  | $ | (0.96         | ) |  | $ | (0.58  | )
|As adjusted                                                                                                                  |  | $                          | (0.16  | ) |                           | $ | (0.06 | )             |  | $ | (1.00         | ) |  | $ | (0.61  | )



The tax benefit
related to the options granted during fiscal 2004 and 2003 would generally be recorded at the Companys federal and state statutory rate of approximately 40%. However, due to the full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets, as discussed
in Note 15, any expense related to stock options would result in a net zero tax effect.



In arriving at an option valuation, the Black-Scholes model considers, among other factors, the expected life of an option and the expected volatility of the Companys stock price. For pro forma purposes, the
estimated fair value of the Companys stock-based awards to employees is amortized over their respective vesting periods.



5. Cumulative Effect of Adoption of a New Accounting Standard



Effective September 30, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 addresses the recognition
and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in a business combination. SFAS No. 142 requires goodwill to no longer be amortized but instead be subject to an impairment test at least annually. Intangible assets with finite lives
continue to be amortized over their estimated useful lives. The impairment test for goodwill is comprised of two parts. The first step compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount
exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, the second step of the goodwill impairment test must be performed. The second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill with the respective carrying amount in order to
determine the amount of impairment loss, if any.



8



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(amounts in thousands, except per share
amounts)



In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the Company
performed the two-step goodwill impairment test process and obtained assistance from a third-party in performing the valuations of its individual reporting units. The valuation methodologies considered included analyses of discounted cash flows at
the reporting unit level, guidelines for publicly traded company multiples and comparable transactions. As a result of these impairment tests, during the first quarter of fiscal 2003 the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $2,421, net of income
taxes of $1,634, to reduce the carrying value of the goodwill to its implied fair value. This charge is reflected as a cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
nine fiscal months ended June 29, 2003.



During the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test following the methodology described above, and determined that the implied fair value of the goodwill was $31 less than the carrying value. And accordingly the Company
recorded an impairment charge for that amount. This charge is reflected in selling and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2003.



In accordance with SFAS No. 142, no amortization of goodwill was recorded for the nine fiscal months ended June 27, 2004 and June 29, 2003.



6. Investments



The Company accounts for its investments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS)
No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. The Companys portfolio consists of commercial paper, fixed income securities and other mutual funds classified as available-for-sale and total $20,051 (of
which $15,231 is included in restricted cash and investments) and $30,345 (of which $14,615 is included in restricted cash and investments) at June 27, 2004 and September 28, 2003, respectively. The Companys portfolio of fixed income
securities have various maturity dates throughout fiscal 2007. Unrealized gains and losses from available-for-sale securities are included in accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders equity. The net unrealized losses for
available-for-sale securities, net of tax, were $277 and $341 for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2004, respectively. The net unrealized losses for available-for-sale securities, net of tax, were $57 and $229 for the three and nine months
ended June 29, 2003, respectively. The net realized losses related to the Companys available-for-sale securities were immaterial for the three and nine month periods ended June 27, 2004 and June 29, 2003.



Investments related to the Companys deferred compensation program are
classified as trading and total $3,123 and $2,654 at June 27, 2004 and September 28, 2003, respectively. The deferred compensation investments are included in current restricted investments in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets at June
27, 2004 and September 28, 2003. Net unrealized gains for trading securities were $31 and $256 for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2004, respectively, and $158 and $306 for the three and nine months ended June 29, 2003, respectively. Net
realized gains (losses) for trading securities were $1 and $14 for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2004, respectively, and $1 and ($118) for the three and nine months ended June 29, 2003, respectively. All investments are carried at fair
value. The following table presents the classification of the Companys investments:



|                                     |  |               |        |                    |   |       
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------- | ------ | ------------------ | - | ------
|                                     |  | June 27, 2004 |        | September 28, 2003
|Current                              |  |               |        |                    |   |       
|Available-for-sale securities        |  | $             | 4,820  |                    | $ | 15,730
|Current Restricted                   |  |               |        |                    |   |       
|Trading securities                   |  |               | 3,123  |                    |   | 2,654 
|                                     |  |               |        |                    |   |       
|Total current investments            |  | $             | 7,943  |                    | $ | 18,384
|                                     |  |               |        |                    |   |       
|Long-term Restricted                 |  |               |        |                    |   |       
|Cash                                 |  | $             | 6,700  |                    | $ | 7,000 
|Certificate of deposit               |  |               | 16,000 |                    |   |      
|Available-for-sale securities        |  |               | 15,231 |                    |   | 14,615
|                                     |  |               |        |                    |   |       
|Total long-term cash and investments |  | $             | 37,931 |                    | $ | 21,615
|                                     |  |               |        |                    |   |       



9



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(amounts in thousands, except per share
amounts)



7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets



Goodwill increased $373 on a net basis at June 27, 2004 as compared to
September 28, 2003 resulting from the acquisition of a traditional franchise operation during the second quarter of fiscal 2004 (see Note 9). The change in goodwill at September, 28, 2003 as compared to the beginning of fiscal 2003, resulted from a
goodwill impairment charge of $4,086 (see Note 5) and the purchase of two licensed franchise operations during the second and third quarters of fiscal 2003.



The following table summarizes the activity in goodwill:



|                  |  |               |       |   |                    |   |        |  
|----------------- |  | ------------- | ----- | - | ------------------ | - | ------ | -
|                  |  | June 27, 2004 |       |   | September 28, 2003 |  
|Beginning of year |  | $             | 3,030 |   |                    | $ | 4,283  |  
|Additions         |  |               | 402   |   |                    |   | 2,833  |  
|Impairment        |  |               |      |   |                    |   | (4,086 | )
|Other adjustments |  |               | (29   | ) |                    |   |       |  
|                  |  |               |       |   |                    |   |        |  
|End of period     |  | $             | 3,403 |   |                    | $ | 3,030  |  
|                  |  |               |       |   |                    |   |        |  



Other intangible
assets with finite lives include franchise rights, client relationships and non-competition agreements and are amortized on a straight-line basis. The weighted average amortization period is 6.3 years for franchise rights; 3.5 years for client
relationships; and 5.0 years for non-competition agreements. Amortization expense related to other intangible assets was $136 and $152 for the three fiscal months ended June 27, 2004 and June 29, 2003, respectively, and $344 and $207 for the nine
fiscal months ended June 27, 2004 and June 29, 2003, respectively.



The following table presents the details of the Companys other intangible assets that are subject to amortization:



|                              |  |               |       |   |                    |   |       |  
|----------------------------- |  | ------------- | ----- | - | ------------------ | - | ----- | -
|                              |  | June 27, 2004 |       |   | September 28, 2003 |  
|Franchise rights              |  | $             | 2,090 |   |                    | $ | 1,480 |  
|Client relationships          |  |               | 470   |   |                    |   | 100   |  
|Non-competition agreements    |  |               | 414   |   |                    |   | 294   |  
|                              |  |               |       |   |                    |   |       |  
|                              |  |               | 2,974 |   |                    |   | 1,874 |  
|Less accumulated amortization |  |               | (563  | ) |                    |   | (219  | )
|                              |  |               |       |   |                    |   |       |  
|Total                         |  | $             | 2,411 |   |                    | $ | 1,655 |  
|                              |  |               |       |   |                    |   |       |  



At June 27, 2004, $136
of the unamortized balance of intangible assets is expected to be amortized in the remaining three months of fiscal 2004; and $544, $542, $494, $380, $241 and $74 in fiscal years 2005 through 2009 and thereafter, respectively.



8. Capitalized Software Costs



During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company changed the estimated
useful life of the capitalized software used to manage revenues and track client activities. The primary factor contributing to the change in the estimated useful life was that the softwares function was no longer consistent with the
Companys strategic plan and the Companys offices were not fully utilizing the system. The Company discontinued use of the software in November 2003. The change in accounting estimate resulted in additional amortization expense of $507
during the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The additional amortization expense is included in depreciation and amortization expense for the nine months ended June 27, 2004 in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.



9. Purchase of Franchised Operations



From time to time, the Company may selectively purchase traditional and
licensed franchise operations for strategic reasons, including facilitating its expansion plans of increased market presence in identified geographic regions. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the results of operations of these offices
commencing as of their respective acquisition dates. Results of operations for the acquired licensed operations are recorded in accordance with the Companys related revenue recognition policy until the acquisition date. Prior to the
acquisitions, the revenues and related costs of revenues for licensed franchises are recognized as licensed franchise revenues and cost of licensed franchise revenues in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. For traditional franchise operations
prior to acquisition, the



10



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(amounts in thousands, except per share
amounts)



revenues are recorded as franchise royalties. Subsequent to the
acquisitions, the revenues and related costs of revenues are recognized as direct revenues and cost of direct revenues in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. These acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method of accounting.



On January 12, 2004 (the closing date), the
Company completed the acquisition of one of its traditional franchise operations consisting of two offices in Texas for $1,800. At the closing date, the Company paid $1,443 in cash ($57 in net amounts owed to the Company by the franchisee were
deducted from the cash payment). The remaining $300 will be paid in cash two years from the closing date. Of the total purchase price, $402 was allocated to goodwill. Additionally, $1,100 was allocated to amortizable intangible assets consisting of
franchise rights ($610), client relationships ($370) and non-competition agreements ($120) and is being amortized over the estimated useful lives of 6.5 years, 3.5 years, and 5.0 years, respectively. The Asset Purchase Agreement includes provisions
for contingent payments for the three years subsequent to the closing date and is based upon performance targets related to increases in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) over the prior year.



During March and April of fiscal 2003, the Company acquired a
large licensed franchise operation in Tennessee consisting of several offices and purchased assets of a smaller licensed franchise in Texas consisting of one office, respectively. The combined purchase price was $3,763 ($3,720 for the Tennessee
franchise and $43 for the Texas franchise). The Company recorded goodwill of $2,833 ($2,799 for the Tennessee franchise and $34 for the Texas franchise). In connection with the Tennessee acquisition, $1,840 of the purchase price was allocated to
amortizable intangible assets consisting of franchise rights ($1,480), client relationships ($100) and non-competition agreement ($260) and is being amortized over the estimated useful lives of 6.2 years, 3.5 years, and 5.0 years, respectively. The
Stock Purchase Agreement for the Tennessee acquisition includes a provision for contingent payments for the two years subsequent to December 29, 2002. The contingent payments are based upon performance targets related to increases in the Tennessee
offices EBITDA over the prior year. The Company was not required to make a payment for the twelve months ended December 28, 2003. Additionally, the Company is required to pay monthly royalties to the prior franchisee based upon revenues of a
certain client of the Tennessee office for as long as Remedy services that client. The Company paid $145 and $639 in royalty payments which are included in selling and administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2004, respectively.



10.
Workers Compensation



Remedy provides workers
compensation insurance to its temporary associates and colleagues. Effective April 1, 2001 and for workers compensation claims originating in the majority of states (referred to as non-monopolistic states), the Company has contracted with
independent, third-party carriers for workers compensation insurance and claims administration. Each annual contract covers all workers compensation claim costs greater than a specified deductible amount, on a per occurrence
basis. The Company is self-insured for its deductible liability ($250 per individual claim incurred from April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002 and $500 for all subsequent claims). The insurance carrier is responsible for incremental losses in excess of
the applicable deductible amount.



Remedy establishes a reserve
for the estimated remaining deductible portion of its workers compensation claims, representing the estimated ultimate cost of claims and related expenses that have been reported but not settled, and that have been incurred but not reported.
The estimated ultimate cost of a claim is determined by applying actuarially determined loss development factors to current claims information. These development factors are determined based upon a detailed actuarial analysis of historical claims
experience of both the Company and the staffing industry. The Company periodically updates the actuarial analysis supporting the development factors utilized and revises those development factors, as necessary. Adjustments to the claims reserve are
charged or credited to expense in the periods in which they occur. The estimated remaining deductible liability under the aforementioned contracts as of June 27, 2004 is approximately $34,930, of which $12,249 is recorded as current and $22,681 is
recorded as non-current in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.



The Company also has an aggregate $5,260 current liability recorded at June 27, 2004 for additional premiums due under previous guaranteed cost policies and for premiums due under current policies in states where the
Company is statutorily required to participate in the state managed workers compensation fund.



11



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(amounts in thousands, except per share
amounts)



The Company is contractually required to
collateralize its remaining obligation under each of these workers compensation insurance contracts through the use of irrevocable letters of credit, pledged cash and securities or a combination thereof. The level and type of collateral
required for each policy year is determined by the insurance carrier at the inception of the policy year and may be modified periodically. As of June 27, 2004, the Company has outstanding letters of credit of $34,661 and pledged cash and securities
totaling $21,931. The pledged cash and securities are restricted and cannot be used for general corporate purposes while the Companys remaining obligations under the workers compensation program are outstanding. Accordingly, the Company
has classified these pledged cash and securities as restricted in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.



From July 22, 1997 through March 31, 2001, the Company had a fully insured workers compensation program with Reliance. The annual premium for this
program was based upon actual payroll costs multiplied by a fixed rate. Each year, the Company prepaid the premium based upon estimated payroll levels and an adjustment was subsequently made for differences between the estimated and actual amounts.
Subsequent to March 31, 2001 (the end of Companys final policy year with Reliance), Reliance became insolvent and was subsequently liquidated. The Company is currently in litigation with the California Insurance Guaranty Association regarding
financial responsibility for all remaining open claims under the Reliance workers compensation program as discussed in Note 2.



11. Line of Credit



The Company executed a new credit facility dated February 4, 2004 with Bank of America, which replaced its existing credit agreement with Bank of America
and Union Bank of California. The new credit facility provides for aggregate borrowings not to exceed $40,000 including any letters of credit existing under the prior credit agreement. The Companys obligation under the line of credit is
collateralized by certain assets of the Company. In addition, the Company is required to maintain a $16,000 Bank of America Certificate of Deposit to satisfy the collateral requirement, which is classified as restricted cash and investments in the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The credit agreement expires on June 1, 2005. The interest rate is at the Companys discretion, either the Bank of Americas prime rate plus 0.0% or 0.5% (depending on the amount of outstanding
borrowings) or the London Inter Bank Offering Rate (LIBOR) plus 0.75% or 1.5% (depending on the amount of outstanding borrowings) and is paid monthly. The Company is required to pay quarterly fees of 0.25% per annum on the unused portion
of the line of credit. Under the new agreement, the Company is also required to comply with certain restrictive covenants, the most restrictive of which limits the Companys net loss for each fiscal quarter and on a fiscal year-to-date basis.
As of June 27, 2004, the Company was in compliance with all restrictive covenants. However, if the Company is not profitable in the remaining three months of the current fiscal year, it could be out of compliance on a full fiscal year-to-date basis,
in which case the Company would attempt to negotiate a waiver with the Bank of America.



The Company has no borrowings outstanding as of June 27, 2004 and September 28, 2003. The Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling $34,661 and $21,911 as of June 27, 2004 and September 28, 2003,
respectively, as contractually required under the terms of its workers compensation insurance agreements as discussed above. Quarterly, the Company is required to pay 0.75% in interest on the first $16,000 of the outstanding letters of credit
and 1.50% on the remaining $18,661.



12. Office Closures



The Companys strategic plan focuses on increasing the percentage of
business it receives from higher margin service lines, increasing revenues through targeted sales force and distribution channel expansion, and enhancing operating margins through continuous productivity improvements. As a result, and given overall
industry and market conditions, the Company is continually reassessing its current operating structure. Consequently, during the third quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company implemented plans to close or consolidate certain Company-owned offices,
specifically those that were under-performing or primarily dedicated to recruiting activities. During the third quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company recorded a $534 charge for costs in connection with these plans, including $406 related to
contractual lease obligations



12



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(amounts in thousands, except per share
amounts)



and $128 for severance benefits, fixed asset disposals and other
costs associated with these office closures. The $534 charge is included in selling and administrative expenses in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended June 29, 2003. There were additional
charges of $458 related to the office closures during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. There were no charges related to the office closure plans for the three and nine fiscal months ended June 27, 2004. At June 27, 2004 and September 28, 2003, the
remaining liability resulting from the charges in connection with this plan was $107 and $464, respectively, which is included in Other Accrued Expenses, in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, and relates to estimated losses on
subleases and the remaining net lease payments on closed locations that will be paid out through fiscal 2008. During the first nine months of fiscal 2004, the Company closed four under performing Company-owned offices. The Company did not incur
additional costs in connection with the fiscal 2004 closures and accordingly no charges were recorded for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2004.



13. Restricted Stock Awards



At June 27, 2004, the Company had 545 shares of restricted Class A Common Stock issued and outstanding. During the first nine months of fiscal 2004, the
Leadership Development and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors did not issue any additional shares of restricted Class A Common Stock (the Restricted Stock) under the Companys 1996 Stock Incentive Plan. The Restricted
Stock has no purchase price and cliff vests after five years. However, the Restricted Stock is subject to accelerated vesting after three years if certain performance goals are achieved. All unvested Restricted Stock shall be forfeited upon
voluntary termination or termination for cause. Upon retirement or involuntary termination for other than cause, 20% vests one year from the grant date with the remaining unvested shares vesting at 1.66% each month thereafter. At the time of
issuance, unearned compensation is recorded as a component of shareholders equity and is based upon the fair market value of the Companys Class A Common Stock on the respective grant dates. The unearned compensation is currently being
amortized and charged to operations over the initial five-year vesting period. During the first and third quarters of fiscal 2004, 70 and 35 shares, respectively, of previously issued Restricted Stock were forfeited.



14. Shareholders Equity



Comprehensive Loss



The components of comprehensive loss, net of taxes are as follows:



|                                         |  |                           |        |   |                          |   |      |               |  |   |               |   |  |   |        |  
|---------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ------ | - | ------------------------ | - | ---- | ------------- |  | - | ------------- | - |  | - | ------ | -
|                                         |  | Three Fiscal Months Ended |        |   | Nine Fiscal Months Ended |  
|                                         |  | June 27, 2004             |        |   | June 29, 2003            |   |      | June 27, 2004 |  |   | June 29, 2003 |  
|Net loss                                 |  | $                         | (1,308 | ) |                          | $ | (435 | )             |  | $ | (8,649        | ) |  | $ | (5,218 | )
|Other comprehensive loss:                |  |                           |        |   |                          |   |      |               |  |   |               |   |  |   |        |  
|Change in unrealized loss on investments |  |                           | (277   | ) |                          |   | (57  | )             |  |   | (341          | ) |  |   | (229   | )
|Translation adjustments                  |  |                           | (32    | ) |                          |   | 1    |               |  |   | (33           | ) |  |   | 1      |  
|                                         |  |                           |        |   |                          |   |      |               |  |   |               |   |  |   |        |  
|Total comprehensive loss                 |  | $                         | (1,617 | ) |                          | $ | (491 | )             |  | $ | (9,023        | ) |  | $ | (5,446 | )
|                                         |  |                           |        |   |                          |   |      |               |  |   |               |   |  |   |        |  



Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income



The components of accumulated other
comprehensive income are as follows:



|                                                    |  |               |      |   |                    |   |    
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | ---- | - | ------------------ | - | ---
|                                                    |  | June 27, 2004 |      |   | September 28, 2003
|Accumulated unrealized (loss) gain on investments   |  | $             | (228 | ) |                    | $ | 113
|Accumulated translation adjustments                 |  |               | (12  | ) |                    |   | 21 
|                                                    |  |               |      |   |                    |   |    
|Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |  | $             | (240 | ) |                    | $ | 134
|                                                    |  |               |      |   |                    |   |    



15. Income Taxes



The income tax provision for the interim periods of fiscal year 2004
consists primarily of the Companys state and foreign income tax obligations as compared with an income tax benefit provided for the interim periods presented for



13



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(amounts in thousands, except per share
amounts)



fiscal year 2003. The Companys overall annual effective tax
rate of (5.3%) for fiscal year 2004 differs from the statutory rate due to the current period valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset. The effective tax rate of 61.0% for fiscal year 2003 differs from the statutory rate due to the effect
of Work Opportunity and Welfare to Work Tax Credits. The estimated annual effective tax rate is revised quarterly based upon actual operating results, the tax credits earned to date as well as current annual projections. The cumulative impact of any
change in the estimated annual effective tax rate is recognized in the period the change in estimate occurs.



16. Variable Interest Entities



During the second quarter of fiscal 2004 the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46 (Revised), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46-R). FIN 46-R provides the
principles to consider in determining when variable interest entities (VIE) must be consolidated in the financial statements of the primary beneficiary. Variable interests are contractual, ownership or other monetary interests in an
entity that change with changes in the fair value of the entitys net assets exclusive of variable interests. An entity is considered to be a VIE when its capital is insufficient to permit it to finance its activities without additional
subordinated financial support or its equity investors, as a group, lack the characteristics of having a controlling financial interest. FIN 46-R requires the consolidation of entities which are determined to be VIEs when the reporting company
determines that it will absorb a majority of the VIEs expected losses, receive a majority of the VIEs residual returns, or both. The company that is required to consolidate the VIE is called the primary beneficiary.



The Company has two forms of franchise arrangements, traditional and licensed
and has determined that the franchise arrangements alone do not create a variable interest. However, the Company has provided limited financing to certain franchisees or licensees, which does create a potential variable interest relationship. Based
on further analysis performed by the Company, management has determined that these franchisees or licensees are not VIEs. Accordingly, consolidation of these franchisees and licensees is not required.



14



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



In addition to historical information, managements discussion and analysis includes certain forward-looking statements, including, but not
limited to, those related to the growth and strategies, future operating results and financial position as well as economic and market events and trends of RemedyTemp, Inc., including its wholly-owned subsidiaries, (collectively, the
Company). All forward-looking statements made by the Company, including such statements herein, include material risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on factors beyond the control of the Company (certain of such
statements are identified by the use of words such as anticipate, believe, estimate, intend, plan, expect, will, future, or similar words). Accordingly,
the Companys actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in any such forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, without limitation, the success of certain cost reduction efforts, the
continued performance of the RemX® specialty
division, the Companys ability to realize improvements in the months ahead, changes in general or local economic conditions that could impact the Companys expected financial results, the availability of sufficient personnel, various
costs relating to temporary workers and personnel, including but not limited to workers compensation, the Companys ability to expand its sales capacity and channels, to open new points of distribution and expand in core geographic
markets, attract and retain clients and franchisees/licensees, the outcome of litigation, software integration and implementation, application of deferred tax assets and other factors described in the Companys filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission regarding risks affecting the Companys financial condition and results of operations. The Company does not undertake to publicly update or revise its forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes make it
clear that any projected results expressed or implied therein will not be realized. The following should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and Notes thereto.



Company Overview



RemedyTemp, Inc. is a national provider of clerical, light industrial,
information technology and financial temporary staffing and direct hire services to industrial, service and technology companies, professional organizations and governmental agencies. The Company provides its services in 35 states, District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico and Canada through a network of 235 offices, of which 131 are Company-owned and 104 are independently-managed franchises.



Executive Summary



The staffing industry is a highly competitive industry, which has contributed to significant price competition and lower margins as major staffing
companies have attempted to maintain or gain market share. During the last nine months, global economic conditions have continued to improve which appears to signal a sustainable job-creating recovery. The demand for temporary staffing has also
started to grow as demonstrated by recent reports from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (the BLS) stating that staffing industry companies employed 10.3% more workers in June 2004 than in the same period of 2003 resulting in the thirteenth
consecutive month of year-over-year improvements. Management continues to be encouraged by the recent economic data, as well as the steady job growth in the staffing industry. Historic trends in employment growth following a recession have been
slowed, due in part to productivity gains and modest new job growth.



The increases in workers compensation costs and state unemployment insurance costs the Company experienced in fiscal 2003 and the nine months of fiscal 2004 have been significant. The Company does not expect the workers
compensation cost increases to continue at such a significant rate throughout the remainder of fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005. However, the Company believes that the increases in state unemployment insurance costs will continue for the remainder of
fiscal 2004, both within and outside of California. During the second quarter of fiscal 2004, the California legislature enacted reforms to its workers compensation laws. Although it is too early to determine the impact, the Company is
optimistic the changes will have a positive effect on its profitability.



With long term positive prospects, the staffing industry has always been inherently difficult to forecast due to its dependence on economic factors and the strength of the labor market. However, the Company has
developed a forecasting tool jointly with the A. Gary Anderson Center for Economic Research at Chapman University. The Quarterly Labor Forecast Report, which is based upon BLS and other economic factors, helps to predict total demand for temporary
labor. The Company has been utilizing this tool for several years and has recently begun to publish the results on a quarterly basis.



15



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



During fiscal 2003, the Company re-engineered its revenue and marketing strategies, taking advantage of its strong brand
name and infrastructure, and positioned itself for profitable growth. The Companys long-term growth strategies include:



| |  | Increasing the proportion of revenue from its Company-owned offices;
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Increasing the proportion of revenue generated from outside of California to mitigate rising state unemployment costs and workers compensation costs;
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Increasing Company-owned office revenues (Company-owned office revenue or direct revenue) in its higher margin clerical business;
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Increasing direct hire revenue (whereby the Company earns a fee for placing an associate in a permanent position);
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Targeting small to midsize customers which typically generate higher margins; and
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Doubling the number of sales representatives in the field in the next several years (referred to as the Companys investment hire goal).
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Operations



Revenues for the three months ended June 27, 2004 increased 8.8% over the same period in the prior year while revenues for
the nine months ended June 27, 2004 increased 4.3% in year-over-year comparisons.



The Companys revenues are derived from Company-owned offices and independently-managed franchise offices. The Companys franchise arrangements are structured in either a traditional franchise format or a
licensed franchise format.



The table below sets forth the
number of Company-owned, traditional and licensed franchise offices:



|                              |  |               |  |              
|----------------------------- |  | ------------- |  | -------------
|                              |  | June 27, 2004 |  | June 29, 2003
|Company-owned offices         |  | 131           |  | 120          
|Licensed franchise offices    |  | 95            |  | 111          
|Traditional franchise offices |  | 9             |  | 14           
|                              |  |               |  |              
|Total offices                 |  | 235           |  | 245          
|                              |  |               |  |              



The Company opened 16
direct offices during the first nine months of fiscal 2004 and closed four under performing offices. Eleven of the new direct offices are located outside of California, which is consistent with the Companys strategic plan and associated
expansion efforts increasing the proportion of revenue generated from business outside of California to increase its national presence and mitigate the impact of rising unemployment insurance and workers compensation costs within California.
Revenues generated in California decreased to 43.5% of total revenues for the nine months ended June 27, 2004 as compared to 44.3% for nine months ended June 29, 2003.



Traditional Franchise



Under the Companys traditional franchise agreements, the franchisee pays all lease and working capital costs relating to its office, including
funding payroll and collecting clients accounts. Generally, the franchisee pays the Company an initial franchise fee and continuing franchise fees, or royalties, at a standard rate of 7.0% of its gross billings. Franchisees that have renewed
their franchise agreement could qualify for a reduced rate (ranging from 5.5%-6.5%) based on gross billings. Additionally, a discounted rate is utilized with national accounts for which the Companys fee is reduced. The average royalty rate was
6.1% for the nine months ended June 27, 2004. The Company processes payroll and invoices clients, and the franchisee employs all management staff and temporary personnel affiliated with its office. The Company no longer offers this form of franchise
agreement.



Licensed Franchise



Under the Companys licensed franchise agreements, the licensee pays
the Company an initial franchise fee and pays all lease and operating costs relating to its office. The licensee employs all management staff affiliated with its office, but the Company employs all temporary personnel affiliated with the licensed
franchise office, handles invoicing and collecting clients accounts, and generally remits to the licensed franchisee 60%-70% of the offices gross profit. The Companys share of the licensees gross profit, representing the
continuing franchise fees, is generally not less than 7.5% of the licensed



16



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



franchisees gross billings. However, the Companys share of the licensees gross profit is decreased for (i) national
accounts for which the Companys fee is reduced to compensate for lower gross margins, and (ii) licensees that have renewed their franchise agreement and qualify for a reduced rate (ranging from 6.0%-7.0%) based on gross revenues. For the nine
months ended June 27, 2004 the average Companys share of licensees gross profit was 6.5%. The percentage of gross profit paid to the licensee is generally based on the level of hours billed during the contract year.



Results of Operations



For the Three Fiscal Months Ended June 27, 2004 Compared to the Three Fiscal Months Ended June 29, 2003



Revenue



|                              |  |                            |         |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |        |   
|----------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ------- | ----------------------- | - | -------- |  | - | -------- | - |  | ------ | --
|                              |  | For the Three Months Ended |         | Favorable (Unfavorable) |  
|                              |  | June 27, 2004              |         | June 29, 2003           |   | $ Change |  |   | % Change |  
|Company-owned office revenues |  | $                          | 85,537  |                         | $ | 74,135   |  | $ | 11,402   |   |  | 15.4   | % 
|Licensed franchise revenues   |  |                            | 43,378  |                         |   | 44,361   |  |   | (983     | ) |  | (2.2   | %)
|Franchise royalties           |  |                            | 335     |                         |   | 337      |  |   | (2       | ) |  | (1.0   | %)
|Initial franchise fees        |  |                            |        |                         |   | 5        |  |   | (5       | ) |  | (100.0 | %)
|                              |  |                            |         |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |        |   
|Total revenues                |  | $                          | 129,250 |                         | $ | 118,838  |  | $ | 10,412   |   |  | 8.8    | % 
|                              |  |                            |         |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |        |   



| |  | The mix between direct, licensed franchise and traditional royalty revenues shifted with direct revenues accounting for 66.2% of total revenues for the three fiscal months ended
June 27, 2004 as compared to 62.4% for the same period of the prior year. This overall shift in business mix is consistent with the Companys long-term strategy of generating a higher proportion of its overall revenues from its Company-owned
offices.
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Direct revenue increased 15.4% for the third quarter of fiscal 2004 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The Tennessee offices associated with the licensed franchise
acquisition during the second quarter of fiscal 2003 increased $2,053 for the three months ended June 27, 2004, as compared to the same period in the prior year. The Companys RemX® specialty staffing division increased $3,025 to $7,915 for
the three fiscal months ended June 27, 2004 from $4,890 for the same period of the prior year; $1,042 of the increase in RemX® is attributable to the acquisition of the traditional franchise office during the second quarter of fiscal 2004 (see
Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The Company also experienced increased revenue from the addition of several large new customers and increased revenue from existing customers.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | The $983 or 2.2% decrease in the licensed franchise revenue is due to the loss of a large customer; a decrease in revenue from existing customers; and fewer licensed franchise
offices in the current year as a result of closures related to reduced business and the non-renewal of expired licensed franchise agreements.
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The following table summarizes the Companys business mix as a percent of revenue:



|                 |  |                            |   |  |               |  
|---------------- |  | -------------------------- | - |  | ------------- | -
|                 |  | For the Three Months Ended |  
|                 |  | June 27, 2004              |   |  | June 29, 2003 |  
|Light Industrial |  | 67.3                       | % |  | 65.8          | %
|Clerical         |  | 26.3                       | % |  | 29.6          | %
|RemX®            |  | 6.1                        | % |  | 4.1           | %



| |  | The increase in revenues generated from the light industrial sector during the third quarter of fiscal 2004 is due to the addition of several new large customers and increased
volume from existing customers. The increase was offset slightly by the loss of several smaller clients.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | The decreased revenue from the clerical sector is a result of decreased business with existing large volume customers, a significant portion was attributed to the financial services
industry, offset somewhat by increased business with existing smaller customers.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



17



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



| |  | The increase in the revenues generated from the RemX® division is consistent with the Companys long-term strategic plan to shift its overall business mix to higher margin
services.
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Cost of Revenues



|                                      |  |                            |         |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |       |   
|------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ------- | ----------------------- | - | -------- |  | - | -------- | - |  | ----- | --
|                                      |  | For the Three Months Ended |         | Favorable (Unfavorable) |  
|                                      |  | June 27,2004               |         | June 29,2003            |   | $ Change |  |   | % Change |  
|Cost of Company-owned office revenues |  | $                          | 70,867  |                         | $ | 62,122   |  | $ | (8,745   | ) |  | (14.1 | )%
|Cost of licensed franchise revenues   |  |                            | 34,605  |                         |   | 35,279   |  |   | 674      |   |  | 1.9   | % 
|                                      |  |                            |         |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |       |   
|Total cost of revenues                |  | $                          | 105,472 |                         | $ | 97,401   |  | $ | (8,071   | ) |  | (8.3  | )%
|                                      |  |                            |         |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |       |   



| |  | Total cost of direct and licensed franchise revenues consists of wages and other expenses related to temporary associates and as a percentage of revenues was 81.6% and 82.0% for the
third quarter of fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively. The 8.3% increase in total cost of revenues is consistent with the increase in revenues with a slight increase in gross margin.
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | The increase in cost of direct revenues is consistent with the 15.4% increase in direct revenue with a slight improvement in gross margin despite an increase in the state
unemployment insurance costs and workers compensation costs for the three months ended June 27, 2004. The Company believes that the increase in state unemployment insurance costs will continue for the remainder of fiscal 2004, both within and
outside of California. The small increase in gross margin is attributable to the Companys success in its efforts to increase markup (defined as the bill rate/wage rate) and the continued growth in the RemX® division which traditionally
generates higher revenues.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | The decrease in cost of licensed franchise revenues is consistent with the 2.2% decrease in licensed franchise revenue.
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Overall consolidated gross margin improved slightly to 18.4% for the three fiscal months ended June 27, 2004 as compared to 18.0% for the three fiscal months ended June 29, 2003 and
was attributable to the increases in the Companys markup for the current period as compared with the same period in the prior year and the continued growth in the RemX® division which traditionally generates higher margins. The increase in
gross margin was also enhanced with increases in direct hire revenues, whereby the Company earns a fee for placing an associate in a permanent position. The improvements in gross margin were offset by increases in workers compensation and
state unemployment insurance costs. In aggregate, workers compensation and state unemployment insurance costs represented 9.3% and 7.5% of total cost of revenue for the three months ended June 27, 2004 and June 29, 2003, respectively.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Operating Expenses



|                                    |  |                            |        |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |       |   
|----------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ------ | ----------------------- | - | -------- |  | - | -------- | - |  | ----- | --
|                                    |  | For the Three Months Ended |        | Favorable (Unfavorable) |  
|                                    |  | June 27,2004               |        | June 29,2003            |   | $ Change |  |   | % Change |  
|Licensees share of gross profit    |  | $                          | 5,900  |                         | $ | 6,002    |  | $ | 102      |   |  | 1.7   | % 
|Selling and administrative expenses |  |                            | 18,115 |                         |   | 16,327   |  |   | (1,788   | ) |  | (11.0 | )%
|Depreciation and amortization       |  |                            | 1,253  |                         |   | 1,547    |  |   | 294      |   |  | 19.0  | % 
|                                    |  |                            |        |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |       |   
|Total operating expenses            |  | $                          | 25,268 |                         | $ | 23,876   |  | $ | (1,392   | ) |  | (5.8  | )%
|                                    |  |                            |        |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |       |   



| |  | Licensees share of gross profit represents the net payments to licensed franchisees based upon a percentage of gross profit generated by the licensed franchise operation. The
decrease in licensees share of gross profit is consistent with the decrease in licensed franchise revenues and cost of licensed franchise revenues. Licensees share of gross profit as a percentage of licensed gross profit increased to
67.3% for the three fiscal months ended June 27, 2004 as compared to 66.1% for the three fiscal months ended June 29, 2003 and primarily resulted from certain large franchisees renewing their licensed franchise agreements during the year, which
included certain revenue thresholds, resulting in higher gross profit payouts to the licensees.
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



18



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



| |  | The following table summarizes the significant changes in selling and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 27, 2004 as compared to the three months ended June 29,
2003:
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          |  |                    |        |   |             |   |        |               |  |   |      |  
|----------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | ------ | - | ----------- | - | ------ | ------------- |  | - | ---- | -
|                                          |  | ConsolidatedChange |        |   | RemX®Change |   |        | OtherOffices* | 
|Colleague salary and related taxes        |  | $                  | (1,653 | ) |             | $ | (912   | )             |  | $ | (741 | )
|Royalty payments                          |  |                    | (20    | ) |             |   |       |               |  |   | (20  | )
|General liability insurance               |  |                    | (319   | ) |             |   |       |               |  |   | (319 | )
|Colleague travel and business conferences |  |                    | (215   | ) |             |   | (57    | )             |  |   | (158 | )
|Outside services                          |  |                    | (190   | ) |             |   | (11    | )             |  |   | (179 | )
|Legal fees                                |  |                    | 92     |   |             |   |       |               |  |   | 92   |  
|Profit sharing                            |  |                    | 21     |   |             |   | (167   | )             |  |   | 188  |  
|Rent                                      |  |                    | 421    |   |             |   | (60    | )             |  |   | 481  |  
|Other SG&A                                |  |                    | 75     |   |             |   | (184   | )             |  |   | 259  |  
|                                          |  |                    |        |   |             |   |        |               |  |   |      |  
|Net change                                |  | $                  | (1,788 | ) |             | $ | (1,391 | )             |  | $ | (397 | )
|                                          |  |                    |        |   |             |   |        |               |  |   |      |  

---

|* | Other Offices category includes the corporate office
|- | ----------------------------------------------------



| |  | Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 14.0% for the three fiscal months ended June 27, 2004 as compared to 13.7% for the same period in the
prior year. The primary factor contributing to the net increase was a $1,653 increase in colleague salaries due to the Companys investment hire goal and the expansion of the RemX® specialty staffing division, offset by a $421 decrease in rent expense related to the
office closures during fiscal 2003.
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | The $294 decrease in depreciation and amortization for the three months ended June 27, 2004 as compared to the three months ended June 29, 2003 is due to an increase in fully
depreciated fixed assets at June 27, 2004 as compared to June 29, 2003 which included the write-off and change in useful life of certain capitalized software costs during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. The decrease in depreciation and
amortization was offset by the incremental amortization expense from identifiable intangible assets resulting from the franchise acquisition during the second quarter of fiscal 2004 (see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Loss from operations decreased $949 to an
operating loss of $1,490 for the three fiscal months ended June 27, 2004 from an operating loss of $2,439 for the three fiscal months ended June 29, 2003. Improvement in the Companys operating loss is due to the increase in direct revenues in
conjunction with gross margin improvement. The decrease in depreciation and amortization also contributed to the improved operating profits.



An income tax provision of $106 was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 consisting primarily of the Companys state and foreign income tax
obligations as compared with an income tax benefit of $1,711 for the third quarter of fiscal year 2003. The Companys overall effective tax rate of (8.8%) for the third quarter of fiscal year 2004 differs from the statutory rate due to the
current period valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset. The effective tax rate of 79.7% for the third quarter of fiscal year 2003 differs from the statutory rate due to the effect of Work Opportunity and Welfare to Work Tax Credits. The
estimated annual effective tax rate is revised quarterly based upon actual operating results, the tax credits earned to date as well as current annual projections. The cumulative impact of any change in the estimated annual effective tax rate is
recognized in the period the change in estimate occurs.



The
Company generated a net loss of $1,308 for the three months ended June 27, 2004 as compared to a net loss of $435 for the three fiscal months ended June 29, 2003.



19



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



For the Nine Fiscal Months Ended June 27, 2004 Compared to the Nine Fiscal Months Ended June 29, 2003



Revenue



|                              |  |                           |         |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |       |   
|----------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ------- | ----------------------- | - | -------- |  | - | -------- | - |  | ----- | --
|                              |  | For the Nine Months Ended |         | Favorable (Unfavorable) |  
|                              |  | June 27,2004              |         | June 29,2003            |   | $ Change |  |   | % Change |  
|Company-owned office revenues |  | $                         | 243,153 |                         | $ | 217,703  |  | $ | 25,450   |   |  | 11.7  | % 
|Licensed franchise revenues   |  |                           | 126,367 |                         |   | 136,494  |  |   | (10,127  | ) |  | (7.4  | )%
|Franchise royalties           |  |                           | 1,110   |                         |   | 1,253    |  |   | (143     | ) |  | (11.4 | )%
|Initial franchise fees        |  |                           | 16      |                         |   | 17       |  |   | (1       | ) |  | (5.9  | )%
|                              |  |                           |         |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |       |   
|Total revenues                |  | $                         | 370,646 |                         | $ | 355,467  |  | $ | 15,179   |   |  | 4.3   | % 
|                              |  |                           |         |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |       |   



| |  | The mix between direct, licensed franchise and traditional royalty revenues shifted with direct revenues accounting for 65.6% of total revenues for the nine fiscal months ended June
27, 2004 as compared to 61.2% for the same period of the prior year. This overall shift in business mix is consistent with the Companys long-term strategy of generating a higher proportion of its overall revenues from its Company-owned
offices.
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | The primary factor contributing to the increase in direct revenue is the acquisition of two licensed franchises during the second and third quarters of fiscal 2003 and a traditional
franchise during the second quarter of fiscal 2004. In aggregate, the acquisitions accounted for $20,795 or 9.6% of the 11.7% direct revenue increase from the prior year. Exclusive of these acquisitions, direct revenues increased $4,655. RemX®,
the Companys specialty staffing division increased $7,241 to $18,844 for the nine months ended June 27, 2004 from $11,603 for the same period in the prior year; $1,765 of the RemX® revenue increase was generated from the traditional
franchise offices acquired during the second quarter of fiscal 2004. The increase in revenue was offset by the loss of a number of customers as a result of the Companys strategy to exit certain non-profitable accounts.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | The decrease in licensed franchise revenue is primarily due to the acquisition of the licensed franchise offices as described above. The acquired licensed franchise offices combined
generated $12,098 of licensed franchise revenue during fiscal 2003 prior to the acquisition. Exclusive of these acquisitions, licensed revenues increased $1,971 resulting from increased revenue from existing customers.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The following table summarizes the Companys business mix as a percent
of revenue:



|                 |  |                           |   |  |              |  
|---------------- |  | ------------------------- | - |  | ------------ | -
|                 |  | For the Nine Months Ended |  
|                 |  | June 27,2004              |   |  | June 29,2003 |  
|Light Industrial |  | 67.6                      | % |  | 67.0         | %
|Clerical         |  | 26.9                      | % |  | 29.4         | %
|RemX®            |  | 5.1                       | % |  | 3.3          | %



| |  | The slight increase in revenues generated from the light industrial sector during the first nine months of fiscal 2004 is due to increased volume from existing customers and the
addition of several large new accounts. The decrease in the clerical sector is a result of decreased revenue from existing large volume customers partially offset by increases in smaller customers, a significant portion of the decrease was
attributable to the financial services industry. Additionally, two of the clerical offices converted to RemX® offices during the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The aggregate revenue from the two offices that converted was $1,437 for the first
nine months of fiscal 2003.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | The continued increase in the revenues generated from the RemX® division is consistent with the Companys long-term strategic plan to shift its overall business mix to
higher margin services.
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



20



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



Cost of Revenues



|                                      |  |                           |         |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |       |   
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ------- | ----------------------- | - | -------- |  | - | -------- | - |  | ----- | --
|                                      |  | For the Nine Months Ended |         | Favorable (Unfavorable) |  
|                                      |  | June 27, 2004             |         | June 29, 2003           |   | $ Change |  |   | % Change |  
|Cost of Company-owned office revenues |  | $                         | 206,014 |                         | $ | 184,680  |  | $ | (21,334  | ) |  | (11.6 | )%
|Cost of licensed franchise revenues   |  |                           | 101,092 |                         |   | 108,771  |  |   | 7,679    |   |  | 7.1   | % 
|                                      |  |                           |         |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |       |   
|Total cost of revenues                |  | $                         | 307,106 |                         | $ | 293,451  |  | $ | (13,655  | ) |  | (4.7  | )%
|                                      |  |                           |         |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |       |   



| |  | Total cost of direct and licensed franchise revenues consists of wages and other expenses related to temporary associates. Total cost of direct and licensed franchise revenues as a
percentage of revenues was 82.9% for the first nine months of fiscal 2004 as compared to 82.6% for the same period in the prior year.
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | The increase in cost of direct revenues is consistent with the 11.7% increase in revenue with a slight improvement in gross margin despite an increase in the state unemployment
insurance costs and workers compensation costs for the nine months ended June 27, 2004. The Company believes that the increase in state unemployment insurance costs will continue for the remainder of fiscal 2004, both within and outside of
California. The small increase in gross margin is attributable to the Companys success in its efforts to increase markup, the growth of its RemX® division, which traditionally generates higher margins, and its ability to increase direct
hire revenues, whereby the Company earns a fee for placing an associate in a permanent position.
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | The decrease in cost of licensed franchise revenues is consistent with the 7.4% decrease in licensed franchise revenues.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Overall consolidated gross margin decreased slightly to 17.1% for the nine fiscal months ended June 27, 2004 as compared to 17.5% for the nine fiscal months ended June 29, 2003 and
was attributable to the increase in workers compensation and state unemployment insurance costs. In aggregate, workers compensation and state unemployment insurance costs represented 9.4% and 8.0% of total cost of revenue for the nine
months ended June 27, 2004 and June 29, 2003, respectively.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | The lower gross margin was partially offset by increases in the Companys markup, continued growth in the RemX® division, which traditionally generates higher margins, and
increases in direct hire revenues, whereby the Company earns a fee for placing an associate in a permanent position.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Operating Expenses



|                                    |  |                           |        |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |       |   
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ------ | ----------------------- | - | -------- |  | - | -------- | - |  | ----- | --
|                                    |  | For the Nine Months Ended |        | Favorable (Unfavorable) |  
|                                    |  | June 27, 2004             |        | June 29, 2003           |   | $ Change |  |   | % Change |  
|Licensees share of gross profit    |  | $                         | 17,044 |                         | $ | 18,363   |  | $ | 1,319    |   |  | 7.2   | % 
|Selling and administrative expenses |  |                           | 51,191 |                         |   | 47,841   |  |   | (3,350   | ) |  | (7.0  | )%
|Depreciation and amortization       |  |                           | 4,515  |                         |   | 4,052    |  |   | (463     | ) |  | (11.4 | )%
|                                    |  |                           |        |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |       |   
|Total operating expenses            |  | $                         | 72,750 |                         | $ | 70,256   |  | $ | (2,494   | ) |  | (3.5  | )%
|                                    |  |                           |        |                         |   |          |  |   |          |   |  |       |   



| |  | Licensees share of gross profit represents the net payments to licensed franchisees based upon a percentage of gross profit generated by the licensed franchise operation. The
decrease in licensees share of gross profit for the nine fiscal months ended June 27, 2004 is consistent with the overall decrease in licensed franchise revenues and cost of licensed franchise revenues. Licensees share of gross profit as
a percentage of licensed gross profit was 67.4% for the nine fiscal months ended June 27, 2004 as compared to 66.2% for the nine fiscal months ended June 29, 2003 and primarily resulted from certain large franchisees renewing their licensed
franchise agreements during the year, which included certain revenue thresholds, resulting in higher gross profit payouts to the licensees.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



21



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



| |  | The following table summarizes the change in selling and administrative expenses for the nine months ended June 27, 2004 as compared to the nine months ended June 29, 2003:
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          |  |                    |        |   |              |   |        |               |  |   |        |  
|----------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | ------ | - | ------------ | - | ------ | ------------- |  | - | ------ | -
|                                          |  | ConsolidatedChange |        |   | RemX® Change |   |        | OtherOffices* | 
|Colleague salary and related taxes        |  | $                  | (3,923 | ) |              | $ | (2,003 | )             |  | $ | (1,920 | )
|Royalty payments                          |  |                    | (465   | ) |              |   |       |               |  |   | (465   | )
|General liability insurance               |  |                    | (328   | ) |              |   |       |               |  |   | (328   | )
|Colleague travel and business conferences |  |                    | (285   | ) |              |   | (102   | )             |  |   | (183   | )
|Profit sharing                            |  |                    | 198    |   |              |   | (482   | )             |  |   | 680    |  
|Bad debt expense                          |  |                    | 201    |   |              |   |       |               |  |   | 201    |  
|Rent                                      |  |                    | 829    |   |              |   | (129   | )             |  |   | 958    |  
|Other SG&A                                |  |                    | 423    |   |              |   | (515   | )             |  |   | 938    |  
|                                          |  |                    |        |   |              |   |        |               |  |   |        |  
|Net change                                |  | $                  | (3,350 | ) |              | $ | (3,231 | )             |  | $ | (119   | )
|                                          |  |                    |        |   |              |   |        |               |  |   |        |  

---

|* | Other Offices category includes the corporate office
|- | ----------------------------------------------------



| |  | Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 13.8% for the nine fiscal months ended June 27, 2004 as compared to 13.5% for the same period in the prior
year. The primary factor contributing to the net increase was a $3,923 increase in field operations colleague salaries due to the Companys investment hire goal and expansion of the RemX® specialty staffing division. The increase in selling
and administrative expenses was offset by an $829 decrease in rent expense due to the closure of Company owned offices during fiscal 2003.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | The following table summarizes the increase in depreciation and amortization expense for the nine months ended June 27, 2004 as compared to the nine months ended June 29, 2003:
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                        |  |                    |      |  
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | ---- | -
|                                                        |  | ConsolidatedChange |     
|Change in estimated useful life of capitalized software |  | $                  | (507 | )
|Amortizable intangible assets due to acquisitions       |  |                    | (137 | )
|Write-off of fixed assets                               |  |                    | (136 | )
|Amortization of licensed software agreement             |  |                    | (294 | )
|Decrease due to fully amortized assets                  |  |                    | 611  |  
|                                                        |  |                    |      |  
|Net change                                              |  | $                  | (463 | )
|                                                        |  |                    |      |  



Loss from operations
increased $970 to an operating loss of $9,210 for the nine fiscal months ended June 27, 2004 from an operating loss of $8,240 for the nine fiscal months ended June 29, 2003 due to the factors described above, which included significant increases in
state unemployment insurance, an increase in selling and administrative expenses and increased depreciation and amortization expense.



The Company incurred a loss (before cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard) of $8,649 for the nine fiscal months ended June 27, 2004
as compared to a loss of $2,797 for the nine fiscal months ended June 29, 2003.



An income tax provision of $433 was recorded in the first nine months of fiscal year 2004 consisting primarily of the Companys state and foreign income tax obligations as compared with an income tax benefit of
$4,374 for the first nine months of fiscal year 2003. The Companys overall annual effective tax rate of (5.3%) for fiscal year 2004 differs from the statutory rate due to the current period valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset.
The effective tax rate of 61.0% for fiscal year 2003 differs from the statutory rate due to the effect of Work Opportunity and Welfare to Work Tax Credits. The estimated annual effective tax rate is revised quarterly based upon actual operating
results, the tax credits earned to date as well as current annual projections. The cumulative impact of any change in the estimated annual effective tax rate is recognized in the period the change in estimate occurs.



The cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard of $2,421 (net
of tax of $1,634) for the nine fiscal months ended June 29, 2003 represents the goodwill impairment charge resulting from the Companys adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142 Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, effective the beginning of fiscal 2003, as discussed in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.



22



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



The Company generated a net loss of $8,649 for the nine months ended June 27, 2004 as compared to a net loss of $5,218 for
the nine fiscal months ended June 29, 2003.



Liquidity and Capital Resources



The Companys balance sheet includes $50,938 in cash
and investments as of June 27, 2004 (including restricted cash and investments discussed below), and it continues to be debt free, although significant letters of credit are outstanding. Historically, the Company has financed its operations through
cash generated by operating activities and its credit facility, as necessary. Generally, the Companys principal uses of cash are working capital needs and capital expenditures (including management information systems initiatives, and direct
office openings) and franchise acquisitions. Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company collateralized $21,615 of its workers compensation liability with pledged cash and securities, as opposed to issuing additional letters of
credit. During the second quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company used $16,000 in cash to collateralize its $40,000 line of credit as required by its new credit facility, as discussed below and in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The
nature of the Companys business requires payment of wages to its temporary associates on a weekly basis, while payments from clients are generally received 30-60 days after the related billing.



Cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities, as reflected
in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, are summarized below:



|                                                 |  |                           |        |   |               |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------- | ------ | - | ------------- | - | ------- | -
|                                                 |  | For the Nine Months Ended |       
|                                                 |  | June 27, 2004             |        |   | June 29, 2003 |  
|Cash provided by (used in)                       |  |                           |        |   |               |   |         |  
|Operating activities                             |  | $                         | 247    |   |               | $ | 10,623  |  
|Investing activities                             |  |                           | (8,511 | ) |               |   | (21,824 | )
|Financing activities                             |  |                           | 121    |   |               |   | 112     |  
|Effect of exchange rate on cash                  |  |                           | (29    | ) |               |   |        |  
|                                                 |  |                           |        |   |               |   |         |  
|Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents        |  |                           | (8,172 | ) |               |   | (11,089 | )
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |  |                           | 13,236 |   |               |   | 26,101  |  
|                                                 |  |                           |        |   |               |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period       |  | $                         | 5,064  |   |               | $ | 15,012  |  
|                                                 |  |                           |        |   |               |   |         |  



| |  | Cash flows from operating activities, compared to the preceding year, were impacted by reduced operating margins, the timing of receivables collections, the timing of payroll
disbursements (including incentive compensation payments), as well as the timing of vendor payments and realization of net tax benefits. Cash flows from operations were also impacted by the timing of the Companys workers compensation
claims payments. While the Company records its liability for open claims based upon the ultimate cost of the claims, the cash outflow for recorded claims cost occurs over time.
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Cash used in investing activities is primarily related to the Companys investment portfolio, which includes highly rated debt securities with maturities ranging from three
months to three years. Net cash inflows related to available-for-sale investments were $10,569 during the first nine months of fiscal 2004 as compared to $8,959 of net cash outflows in the corresponding prior year period. Cash used for purchases of
fixed assets, including information systems development costs, was $1,321 for the nine fiscal months ended June 27, 2004 and $2,108 for nine fiscal months ended June 29, 2003. The Company continues to invest in computer-based technologies and direct
office openings and anticipates approximately $500 in related capital expenditures for the remaining three months of fiscal 2004.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Cash provided by financing activities is primarily a result of shares of the Companys Class A Common Stock issued through the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Cash and cash equivalents decreased $9,948 from
the prior year as a result of the Companys collateralization of its $40,000 line of credit via restricted cash and investments commencing in the second quarter of fiscal 2004. See additional discussion below regarding the new credit facility.



As discussed in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, Remedy provides workers compensation insurance to its temporary associates and colleagues. The Company establishes a reserve for the deductible portion of its workers compensation claims using actuarial estimates of the
ultimate cost of claims and related expenses that have been reported but not settled, and that have been incurred but not reported. The estimated remaining deductible liability under the aforementioned contracts as of June 27, 2004 is approximately
$34,930 of which $12,249 is recorded as current and $22,681 is recorded as non-current in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company also has an aggregate $5,260 current liability recorded at June 27, 2004 for additional premiums due under
previous guaranteed cost policies and for premiums due under current policies in states where the Company is statutorily required to participate in the state managed workers compensation fund.



23



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



The Company is contractually required to collateralize its obligation under each of these workers compensation
insurance contracts through the use of irrevocable letters of credit, pledged cash and securities or a combination thereof. The level and type of collateral required for each policy year is determined by the insurance carrier at the inception of the
policy year and may be modified periodically. The Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling $34,661 and $21,911 as of June 27, 2004 and September 28, 2003, respectively. Quarterly, the Company is required to pay 0.75% in interest on the
first $16,000 of the outstanding letters of credit and 1.50% on the remaining $18,661.



The Company executed a new credit facility dated February 4, 2004 with Bank of America, which replaced its existing credit agreement with Bank of America and Union Bank of California. The new credit facility provides
for aggregate borrowings not to exceed $40,000, including any letters of credit existing under the prior credit agreement. The Companys obligation under the line of credit is collateralized by certain assets of the Company. In addition, the
Company is required to maintain a $16,000 Bank of America Certificate of Deposit to satisfy the collateral requirement, which is classified as restricted cash and investments in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The credit agreement
expires on June 1, 2005. The interest rate is at the Companys discretion, either the Bank of Americas prime rate plus 0.0% or 0.5% (depending on the amount of outstanding borrowings) or LIBOR plus 0.75% or 1.5% (depending on the amount
of outstanding borrowings) and is paid monthly. The Company is required to pay quarterly fees of 0.25% per annum on the unused portion of the line of credit. Under the new agreement, the Company is also required to comply with certain restrictive
covenants, the most restrictive of which limits the Companys net loss for each fiscal quarter and on a fiscal year-to-date basis. As of June 27, 2004, the Company was in compliance with all restrictive covenants. However, if the Company is not
profitable in the remaining three months of the current fiscal year, it could be out of compliance on a full fiscal year-to-date basis, in which case the Company would attempt to negotiate a waiver with the Bank of America.



The Company will most likely be required to increase the amount of letters of
credit outstanding for its new workers compensation program commencing April 4, 2005. Currently, the Company has $5,339 available under the line of credit. This amount plus letter of credit reductions for previous year programs may not be
sufficient for the new insurance policy. Management is in negotiations to increase the size of the line of credit and believes that it should be able to negotiate an adequate increase to satisfy the collateral requirements of the new policy.



The Company has no borrowings outstanding as of June 27, 2004
and September 28, 2003. However, the Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling $34,661 and $21,911 as of June 27, 2004 and September 28, 2003, respectively.



The following table summarizes the letters of credit and pledged cash and securities at June 27, 2004 and September 28,
2003:



|                                                |  |              |        |                   |   |       
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | ------ | ----------------- | - | ------
|                                                |  | June 27,2004 |        | September 28,2003
|Pledged cash and securities                     |  | $            | 21,931 |                   | $ | 21,615
|Collateralized cash related to bank agreement   |  |              | 16,000 |                   |   |      
|                                                |  |              |        |                   |   |       
|Total long-term restricted cash and investments |  | $            | 37,931 |                   | $ | 21,615
|                                                |  |              |        |                   |   |       
|Letters of credit                               |  | $            | 34,661 |                   | $ | 21,911
|                                                |  |              |        |                   |   |       



From July 22, 1997
through March 31, 2001, the Company had a fully insured workers compensation program with Reliance National Insurance Company (Reliance). Subsequent to March 31, 2001 (the end of Companys final policy year with Reliance),
Reliance became insolvent and is currently in liquidation. The Company is in litigation with the California Insurance Guaranty Association regarding financial responsibility for all remaining open claims under the Reliance workers compensation
program as discussed in Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings and in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. An unfavorable outcome in this matter could adversely affect the Companys liquidity and results of operations.



On November 18, 2003, the Company was notified by the State of California
Employment Development Department (the EDD) that the Company allegedly underpaid its state unemployment insurance by approximately $2,000 for the period January 1, 2003 through September 30, 2003. Based on preliminary evaluations and on
advice of its outside counsel, the Company believes that its methodology in calculating its state unemployment insurance is in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The Company is currently working with outside counsel to resolve this
issue. Given the preliminary stage of this matter, no amount has been accrued as of June 27, 2004. The EDD audit is ongoing at June 27, 2004.



24



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



From time to time, the Company may selectively purchase licensed and traditional franchise offices in certain territories
with the intent of expanding the Companys market presence in such regions. It continues to expand its RemX® specialty staffing division into both new and existing markets which may have an impact on future liquidity. The Company
anticipates capital expenditures related to its expansion efforts during the remaining three months of fiscal 2004 to be less than $500.



The Company may continue evaluating certain strategic acquisitions. Such acquisitions may have an impact on liquidity depending on the size of the
acquisition.



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements



The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Regulation
S-K 303(a)(4)(ii).



Contractual Obligations



The Company has no significant contractual obligations not fully recorded in
the Consolidated Balance Sheets or fully disclosed in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.



As of June 27, 2004, the Companys contractual obligations included:



|                       |  |                                               |        |                       |   |                  |  |                  |        |            |   |        |  |   |       
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------- | ------ | --------------------- | - | ---------------- |  | ---------------- | ------ | ---------- | - | ------ |  | - | ------
|                       |  | Contractual Obligations Payment Due by Period
|                       |  | Total                                         |        | Remaining Fiscal 2004 |   | Fiscal 2005-2006 |  | Fiscal 2007-2008 |        | Thereafter
|Operating Leases       |  | $                                             | 17,866 |                       | $ | 2,989            |  | $                | 7,766  |            | $ | 4,709  |  | $ | 2,402 
|Workers Compensation* |  |                                               | 34,930 |                       |   | 3,966            |  |                  | 9,352  |            |   | 8,735  |  |   | 12,877
|                       |  |                                               |        |                       |   |                  |  |                  |        |            |   |        |  |   |       
|Total                  |  | $                                             | 52,796 |                       | $ | 6,955            |  | $                | 17,118 |            | $ | 13,444 |  | $ | 15,279
|                       |  |                                               |        |                       |   |                  |  |                  |        |            |   |        |  |   |       

---

|* | Estimated obligation is based upon actuarial analysis and represents the remaining deductible liability under the Companys current workers compensation contracts. This
amount excludes $5,260 of additional premiums due under previous guaranteed cost policies and for premiums due under current policies in states where the Company is statutorily required to participate in the state managed workers compensation
fund.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The Company believes that its current and
expected levels of working capital of $35,833 and line of credit are adequate to support present operations and to fund future growth and business opportunities for the foreseeable future. The Company would pursue other sources of capital, should it
be necessary.



Critical Accounting Policies



The discussions and analyses of the Companys consolidated financial
condition and results of operations were based on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of any contingent assets and liabilities at the financial statement date, and reported amounts of
revenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, the Companys management reviews and evaluates these estimates and assumptions, including those that relate to revenue recognition, accounts receivable, workers
compensation costs, goodwill, intangible and other long-lived assets, income taxes including the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, contingencies and litigation. These estimates are based on historical experience and a variety of other
assumptions believed reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.



Management believes the following critical accounting policies are those most significantly affected by the judgment, estimates and/or assumptions used in
the preparation of Remedys Consolidated Financial Statements.



Revenue Recognition - The Company generates revenue from the sale of temporary staffing and direct hire placements by its Company-owned and licensed franchise operations and from royalties on revenues of such services by its
traditional franchise operations. Temporary staffing revenues and the related labor costs and payroll taxes are recorded in the period in which the services are performed. Direct hire revenues are recognized when the direct hire candidate begins
full-time employment.



25



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



The Company accounts for the revenues and the related direct costs in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 99-19
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent. The Company is required to assess whether it acts as a principal in its transactions or as an agent acting on the behalf of others. Where the Company is the principal in a
transaction and has the risks and rewards of ownership, the transaction is recorded gross in the Consolidated Statement of Operations, and where the Company acts merely as an agent, only the net fees earned are recorded in the income statement.
Under the Companys traditional franchised agreement, the franchisee has the direct contractual relationship with customers, holds title to the related customer receivables and is the legal employer of the temporary employees.
Accordingly, the Company does not include the revenues and direct expenses from these transactions in its Consolidated Statement of Operations and only records the royalty fee earned. Alternatively, under the Companys licensed
franchise agreements the Company has the direct contractual relationship with customers, holds title to the related customer receivables and is the legal employer of the temporary employees. As the Company retains the risks and rewards of ownership
(such as the liability for the cost of temporary personnel and the risk of loss for collection), the revenues and direct expenses of its licensed franchise operations are included in the Companys results of operations. The Company remits to
each licensed franchisee a portion of the gross margin generated by its office(s).



Accounts Receivable- Remedy provides an allowance for doubtful accounts on its accounts receivable for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. This allowance
is based upon managements analysis of historical write-off levels, current economic trends, routine assessment of its customers financial strength and any other known factors impacting collectibility. If the financial condition of its
customers were to deteriorate, which may result in the impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. Remedys estimates are influenced by the following considerations: the large number of customers and
their dispersion across wide geographic areas, the fact that no single customer accounts for 10% or more of its net revenues and its continuing credit evaluation of its customers financial conditions.



Workers Compensation Costs - The Company maintains reserves for
its workers compensation obligations using actuarial methods to estimate the remaining undiscounted liability for the deductible portion of all claims, including those incurred but not reported. This process includes establishing loss
development factors, based on the historical claims experience of the Company and the industry, and applying those factors to current claims information to derive an estimate of the Companys ultimate claims liability. The calculated ultimate
liability is then reduced by cumulative claims payments to determine the required reserve. Management evaluates the reserve, and the underlying assumptions, regularly throughout the year and makes adjustments as needed. While management believes
that the recorded amounts are adequate, there can be no assurance that changes to managements estimates will not occur due to limitations inherent in the estimation process.



Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets- Effective the first quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company adopted the provisions
of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 requires goodwill to no longer be amortized but instead be subject to an impairment test at least annually or if events or circumstances change that may reduce the fair
value of the reporting unit below its book value. Intangible assets with finite lives continue to be amortized over their estimated useful lives. In connection with the initial impairment test upon adoption, the Company obtained valuations of its
individual reporting units from an independent third-party valuation firm. The valuation methodologies considered included analyses of discounted cash flows at the reporting unit level, guidelines for publicly traded company multiples and comparable
transactions. As a result of these impairment tests, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $2,421, net of income taxes of $1,634, to reduce the carrying value of the goodwill to its implied fair value (see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements). This charge is reflected as a cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine fiscal months ended June 29, 2003.



Other Long-Lived Assets - Effective the first quarter of fiscal 2003,
the Company adopted SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or disposal of Long-Lived Assets. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, the Company assesses the fair value and recoverability of its long-lived assets, whenever events and
circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. In doing so, the Company makes assumptions and estimates regarding future cash
flows and other factors. The fair value of the long-lived assets is dependent upon the forecasted performance of the Companys business and the overall economic environment. When the Company determines that the carrying value of the long-lived
assets may not be recoverable, it measures impairment based upon a forecasted discounted cash flow method. If these forecasts are not met, the Company may have to record additional impairment charges not previously recognized.



Income Taxes In preparing the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements, management estimates the Companys income taxes in each of the taxing jurisdictions in which it operates. This includes estimating the Companys actual current tax expense together with any temporary differences
resulting from the different treatment of certain items, such as the timing for recognizing revenues and expenses, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in the
Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets.



26



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between income and expenses reported for
financial reporting and tax reporting. The Company is required to record a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that it believes is more likely than not to be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance,
the Company considers all positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial performance.



The accounting guidance states that forming a conclusion that a valuation
allowance is not needed is difficult when there is negative evidence such as cumulative losses in recent years. As a result of this guidance, and the Companys recent cumulative losses, management concluded that a full valuation allowance was
appropriate during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 and for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. While the Company hopes to be profitable in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 and beyond, in view of the recent losses there is no assurance that
there will be sufficient future taxable income to realize the benefit of the deferred tax asset. If, after future assessments of the realizability of the deferred tax assets the Company determines a lesser allowance is required it would record a
reduction to income tax expense and the valuation allowance in the period of such determination.



Contingencies and Litigation - There are various claims, lawsuits and pending actions against the Company incident to its operations. If a loss
arising from these actions is probable and can be reasonably estimated, the Company must record the amount of the estimated liability. Based on current available information, management believes that the ultimate resolution of these actions will not
have a material adverse effect on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. As additional information becomes available, management will continue assessing any potential liability related to these actions and may need to revise its
estimates.



Seasonality



The Companys quarterly operating results are affected by the number of
billing days in the quarter and the seasonality of its clients businesses. The first fiscal quarter has historically been relatively strong as a result of manufacturing and retail emphasis on holiday sales. Historically, the second fiscal
quarter shows a decline in comparable revenues from the first fiscal quarter. Revenue growth has historically accelerated in each of the third and fourth fiscal quarters as manufacturers, retailers and service businesses increase their level of
business activity.



27



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK



The Company is exposed to market risk resulting from changes in interest rates and equity prices and, to a lesser extent, foreign currency rates. Under
its current policy, the Company does not engage in speculative or leveraged transactions to manage exposure to market risk. There were no material changes to the disclosures made in Item 7A in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended September 28, 2003 regarding quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk.



ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES



Evaluation of
Disclosure Controls and Procedures



As of June 27, 2004,
the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). In designing and evaluating the Companys disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure
controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also
is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.



Based upon their evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that, subject to the limitations noted above, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to allow timely decisions regarding disclosures to be included in the Companys periodic filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



Changes in Internal Control over
Financial Reporting



There was no significant change in
the Companys internal controls over financial reporting during the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



28



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



PART
IIOTHER INFORMATION



ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS



Litigation



Class Action



On October 16, 2001, GLF Holding Company, Inc. and Fredrick S. Pallas filed
a Complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, against RemedyTemp, Inc., Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc., Remedy Temporary Services, Inc., Karin Somogyi, Paul W. Mikos, and Greg Palmer. The Complaint purports
to be a class action brought by the individual plaintiffs on behalf of all of the Companys franchisees. The Complaint alleges claims for fraud and deceit, negligent misrepresentation, negligence, breach of contract, breach of warranty,
conversion, an accounting, unfair and deceptive practices, restitution and equitable relief. On or about December 3, 2002, plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint alleging these same causes of action, but adding additional facts to the Complaint
particularly with respect to the Companys workers compensation program and adding claims regarding unfair competition on behalf of the general public in addition to their existing class action claim. The plaintiffs claim that Remedy
wrongfully induced its franchisees into signing franchise agreements and took other action that caused the franchisees damage.



The Company believes that plaintiffs claims fall within the arbitration clause contained in the franchise agreements signed by plaintiffs. As a
result, immediately after plaintiffs filed suit, the Company filed arbitration demands against plaintiffs with the American Arbitration Association. On or about April 1, 2003, the Company amended its arbitration demands to add claims against
plaintiffs relating to workers compensation.



The Company
denies and continues to deny the allegations in the Complaint. There has been no finding of wrongdoing by the Company. Nevertheless, to avoid costly, disruptive, and time-consuming litigation, and without admitting any wrongdoing or liability, the
Company negotiated and agreed to a settlement with plaintiffs and stipulated to the certification of a settlement class comprised of all individuals or entities that entered into a Franchise Agreement (including renewals or amendments thereof) with
RemedyTemp., Inc. and/or Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc. anytime prior to March 29, 2004.



On April 6, 2004, the Court preliminarily approved the parties settlement agreement and conditionally certified the Settlement Class. All discovery and other proceedings in this action are stayed, except as may
be necessary to implement the Settlement Agreement. A hearing on final approval of the settlement is set for September 9, 2004. As of June 27, 2004, the maximum exposure is deemed immaterial to the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.



CIGA



In early 2002, as a result of the liquidation of Remedys former
workers compensation insurance carrier, Reliance National Insurance Company (Reliance), the California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) began making efforts to join some of the Companys customers and their
workers compensation insurance carriers (collectively, Customers), in pending workers compensation claims filed by Remedy employees. At the time of these injuries, from July 22, 1997 through March 31, 2001, Remedy was covered
by workers compensation policies issued by Reliance. The Company believes that, under California law, CIGA is responsible for Reliances outstanding liabilities. On April 5, 2002, the California Workers Compensation Appeals Board
(WCAB), at Remedys request, consolidated the various workers compensation claims in which CIGA sought to join Remedys Customers, and agreed to stay proceedings on those claims pending resolution of the issue of
CIGAs obligations to satisfy Reliances obligations to Remedys employees. The WCAB selected a single test case from the consolidated pending cases in which to decide whether CIGA is responsible for the claims of Remedys
employees, or can shift such responsibility to the Customers. The trial occurred on September 20, 2002. The WCAB Administrative Law Judge ruled in favor of CIGA, thus allowing the pending workers compensation matters to proceed against the
Customers. Remedy then filed a motion for reconsideration of the Administrative Law Judges decision by the entire WCAB. On March 28, 2003, the WCAB, en banc, affirmed the ruling of the Administrative Law Judge. Thereafter, in May 2003, the
Company filed a petition for writ of review of the WCABs decision in the California Court of Appeal. The WCAB continued the stay in effect since April 5, 2002, thus preventing CIGA from proceeding until the writ proceeding is
concluded. In January 2004, the Court of Appeal granted the Companys petition and undertook to review the WCABs decision; the Court heard oral argument in the matter on July 9, 2004 and a decision is pending.



29



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



Despite the Companys determination to pursue the review process, there can be no assurance that the current proceeding
will be successful, that further judicial review will be granted in the event of an adverse result, or that the Company will ultimately succeed in overturning the WCABs decision. In the event of an unfavorable outcome, Remedy may be obligated
to reimburse certain clients and believes that it would consider reimbursement of other clients for actual losses incurred as a result of an unfavorable ruling in this matter. If CIGA is permitted to join Remedys Customers, thus triggering the
clients insurance carriers obligation to respond to the claims of Remedys employees, the exposure to Remedy becomes a function of the ultimate losses on the claims and the impact of such claims, if any, on the clients
insurance coverage, including the clients responsibility for any deductibles or retentions under their own workers compensation insurance. Presently, the Company is unable to ascertain the specific details regarding the insurance
coverage of its affected clients or the impact of an unfavorable ruling on such coverage. The Company has received data from the trustee for Reliance regarding outstanding claims that CIGA has attempted to pursue against the Companys current
and former clients. The information indicates that incurred losses, as of June 27, 2004, for the claims in question amount to at least $40,000. The losses incurred to date represent amounts paid to date by the trustee and the remaining claim
reserves on open files. At this time, the Company believes that it is unable to ascertain if the remaining reserves on the claims are appropriate or adequate, since the Company has not been able to gain access to the files due to pending litigation.
Further, as stated above, the Company (i) cautions that it believes the Companys exposure in this matter is not the remaining claims liability, but rather a function of the impact of such claims, if any, on the clients insurance costs;
and (ii) expects to ultimately prevail in this matter and that it will suffer no loss.



Other Litigation



From
time to time, the Company becomes a party to other litigation incidental to its business and operations. The Company maintains insurance coverage that management believes is reasonable and prudent for the business risks that the Company faces. Based
on current available information, management does not believe the Company is party to any legal proceedings that are likely to have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.



Other Contingency



On November 18, 2003, the Company was notified by the State of California
Employment Development Department (the EDD) that the Company allegedly underpaid its state unemployment insurance by approximately $2,000 for the period January 1, 2003 through September 30, 2003. Based on preliminary evaluations and on
advice of its outside counsel, the Company believes that its methodology in calculating its state unemployment insurance is in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The Company is currently working with outside counsel to resolve this
issue. Given the preliminary stage of this matter, no amount has been accrued as of June 27, 2004. The EDD audit is ongoing as of June 27, 2004.



30



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8K



| | (a) | Exhibits
| | --- | --------



Set forth below is a list of the exhibits included as part of this Quarterly Report:



|            |  |                                                                                                                     
|----------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit No. |  | Description                                                                                                         
|            | 
|3.1         |  | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company (a)                                                   
|            | 
|3.2         |  | Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (e)                                                                      
|            | 
|4.1         |  | Specimen Stock Certificate (a)                                                                                      
|            | 
|4.2         |  | Shareholder Rights Agreement (a)                                                                                    
|            | 
|10.1        |  | Robert E. McDonough, Sr. Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (f)                                              
|            | 
|10.2        |  | *Paul W. Mikos Employment Agreement, as amended (i)                                                                 
|            | 
|10.5        |  | Registration Rights Agreement with R. Emmett McDonough and Related Trusts (a)                                       
|            | 
|10.6        |  | *Alan M. Purdy Change in Control Severance Agreement (h)                                                            
|            | 
|10.7        |  | *Deferred Compensation Agreement for Alan M. Purdy (a)                                                              
|            | 
|10.9        |  | Form of Indemnification Agreement (a)                                                                               
|            | 
|10.11       |  | *Amended and Restated RemedyTemp, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (g)                                                
|            | 
|10.12       |  | *Amended and Restated RemedyTemp, Inc. 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (a)                                        
|            | 
|10.13       |  | Form of Franchising Agreement for Licensed Offices (k)                                                              
|            | 
|10.14       |  | Form of Franchising Agreement for Franchised Offices (a)                                                            
|            | 
|10.15       |  | Form of Licensing Agreement for IntelliSearch® (a)                                                                  
|            | 
|10.18       |  | *Additional Deferred Compensation Agreement for Alan M. Purdy (b)                                                   
|            | 
|10.19       |  | Lease Agreement between RemedyTemp, Inc. and Parker-Summit, LLC (c)                                                 
|            | 
|10.22       |  | *RemedyTemp, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (d)                                                                    
|            | 
|10.23       |  | *Amended and Restated Employment Agreement for Greg Palmer (m)                                                      
|            | 
|10.24       |  | *1998 RemedyTemp, Inc. Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation and Stock Ownership Plan for Outside Directors (r)
|            | 
|10.25       |  | Form of Licensing Agreement for i/Search 2000® (e)                                                                  
|            | 
|10.27       |  | *Paul W. Mikos Severance Agreement and General Release (j)                                                          
|            | 
|10.28       |  | *Gunnar B. Gooding Employment and Severance Letter (l)                                                              
|            | 
|10.29       |  | *Cosmas N. Lykos Employment and Severance Letter (l)                                                                
|            | 
|10.30       |  | *Alan M. Purdy Retirement Agreement and General Release (n)                                                         
|            | 
|10.31       |  | *Monty Houdeshell Employment Letter (o)                                                                             
|            | 
|10.32       |  | *Monty Houdeshell Change in Control Severance Agreement (p)                                                         
|            | 
|10.33       |  | *Shawn Mohr Severance Agreement (p)                                                                                 
|            | 
|10.34       |  | Amendment No. 2 to the Lease Agreement between RemedyTemp, Inc. and Parker  Summit, LLC (q)                        
|            | 
|10.36       |  | Business Loan Agreement between Bank of America N.A. and RemedyTemp, Inc. (s)                                       



31



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



|     |  |                                                                                                                             
|---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     | 
|31.1 |  | Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                             
|     | 
|31.2 |  | Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                             
|     | 
|32   |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



---

|* | Indicates a management contract or a compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(a) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-4276), as amended.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(b) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 29, 1996.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(c) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 30, 1997.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(d) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearly period ended September 28, 1997.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(e) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearly period ended September 27, 1998.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(f) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 27, 1998.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(g) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 28, 1999.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(h) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 27, 1999.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(i) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 27, 1999 (original agreement) and
for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2000 (amendment).
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(j) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 1, 2001.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(k) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2001.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(l) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearly period ended September 30, 2001.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(m) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 30, 2001.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(n) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(o) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearly period ended September 29, 2002.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(p) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2003.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(q) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearly period ended September 28, 2003.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(r) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 28, 2003.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(s) | Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of same number to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 28, 2004.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | Reports on Form 8-K.
|--- | --------------------



The Company filed a current Report on Form 8-K on the following:



On May 11, 2004 in connection with the issuance of its press release announcing the financial results for the second fiscal quarter ended March 28,
2004.



32



---

##### Table of Contents

RemedyTemp, Inc.



SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



|               |  |                                                                       
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  | REMEDYTEMP, INC.                                                      
|               | 
|August 9, 2004 |  | /s/ GREG D. PALMER                                                    
|               |  | Greg D. Palmer, President and Chief Executive
Officer                 
|               | 
|August 9, 2004 |  | /s/ MONTY A. HOUDESHELL                                               
|               |  | Monty A. Houdeshell, Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|               |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                                         
|               | 
|August 9, 2004 |  | /s/ JOHN D. SWANCOAT                                                  
|               |  | John D. Swancoat, Vice President and
Controller                       
|               |  | (Principal Accounting Officer)                                        



33