alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 328 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-666, CP2024-675.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21365 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

APR 21 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

ATHENS CARL McLAUGHLIN,

Petitioner - Appellant, No. 98-1338

v. (D. Colorado)

UNITED STATES PAROLE

COMMISSION, FCI FLORENCE,

WARDEN BROOKS,

Respondents - Appellees.

(D.C. No. 96-WM-359)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before ANDERSON , KELLY , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Athens Carl McLaughlin, as a prisoner of the United States, unsuccessfully

challenged his parole date in the district court. He then appealed to this court by

notice of appeal dated August 31, 1998. He was released on parole on

January 28, 1999. His release on parole moots his challenge to his parole date. 

See Vandenburg v. Rodgers , 801 F.2d 377, 378 (10th Cir. 1986).

DISMISSED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephen H. Anderson

Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-2-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                JAN-2-1999
<CASH>                                        14308000
<SECURITIES>                                   2500000
<RECEIVABLES>                                 28248000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   4240000
<INVENTORY>                                   65584000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             123962000
<PP&E>                                        65588000
<DEPRECIATION>                                33208000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               162568000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         47086000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        180000
<OTHER-SE>                                   102837000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 162568000
<SALES>                                      423232000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             431418000
<CGS>                                        257700000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                124798000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 67000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              399000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               49325000
<INCOME-TAX>                                  19990000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           29335000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  29335000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.52
        

</TABLE>
[No. 44903-6-I.

Division One.

December 26, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Matthew Joshua Jensen, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 99-1-00356-4, Larry E. McKeeman, J., entered July 7, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 295 

To reauthorize the Historically Black Colleges and Universities Historic 

Preservation program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2015 

Mr. CLYBURN (for himself, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Ms. ADAMS, Ms. BASS, Mrs. 

BEATTY, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. CARSON

of Indiana, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. CLAY, Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. 

CONYERS, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. 

EDWARDS, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. FATTAH, Ms. FUDGE, Mr. AL GREEN of 

Texas, Mr. HASTINGS, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. JEFFRIES, Ms. EDDIE

BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. KELLY of 

Illinois, Mrs. LAWRENCE, Ms. LEE, Mr. LEWIS, Mr. MEEKS, Ms. MOORE, 

Ms. NORTON, Mr. PAYNE, Ms. PLASKETT, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. RICHMOND, 

Mr. RUSH, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia, Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. VEASEY, Ms. MAXINE WATERS of California, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, and Ms. WILSON of 

Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Historically Black Colleges and 

Universities Historic Preservation program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 295 IH

1 SECTION 1. HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVER2 SITIES HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM 

3 REAUTHORIZED. 

4 Section 507(d)(2) of the Omnibus Parks and Public 

5 Lands Management Act of 1996 (16 U.S.C. 470a note) 

6 is amended by striking the period at the end and inserting 

7 ‘‘and each of fiscal years 2016 through 2025’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
|**Related Party Transactions (Tables)**   | 12 Months Ended                                                                                                                                           
|----------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|**Related Party Transactions [Abstract]** |                                                                                                                                                           
|Loans to Related Parties                  | The following is an analysis of loans to related parties (dollars in thousands):December 31, 2013$683Advances297Repayments(258)Other—December 31, 2014$722
|                                         
|                                          |                                                                                                                                                           
|December 31, 2013                         | $                                                                                                                                                         
|Advances                                  | 297                                                                                                                                                       
|Repayments                                | (258                                                                                                                                                      
|Other                                     | —                                                                                                                                                         
|December 31, 2014                         | $                                                                                                                                                         

X- Details**Name:**
                    us-gaap_RelatedPartyTransactionsAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**
                    us-gaap_**Data Type:**
                    xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**
                    na**Period Type:**
                    duration X- DefinitionTabular disclosure of related party transactions. Examples of related party transactions include, but are not limited to, transactions between (a) a parent company and its subsidiary; (b) subsidiaries of a common parent; (c) and entity and its principal owners and (d) affiliates.+ ReferencesNo definition available.+ Details**Name:**
                    us-gaap_ScheduleOfRelatedPartyTransactionsTableTextBlock**Namespace Prefix:**
                    us-gaap_**Data Type:**
                    nonnum:textBlockItemType**Balance Type:**
                    na**Period Type:**
                    duration
#### LEWIS v. CHAIN INV. CO.

No. 7959.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

Jan. 31, 1934.

Kerr & Gayer, of San Angelo, for appellant.

Upton & Upton and Travis E. Baker, all of San Angelo, for appellee.

McCLENDON, Chief Justice.

Suit by appellee upon a promissory note executed by appellant in favor of Luckie Bros., and to foreclose a chattel mortgage lien upon, an automobile securing the note.

Appellant, among other defenses, including a general denial, pleaded in substance that in the execution of the note and chattel mortgage he was accommodation maker for one Riggs, who owned the automobile, and whose was the obligation represented by the note; that these facts were known to appellee; that appellee had taken possession of the automobile, informing Riggs at the time that it was doing so at the instance of appellant and in satisfaction of the debt against the automobile; that appellant offered to pay the note upon surrender to him of the automobile, which appellee refused to do. These facts were pleaded as an estoppel on appellee’s part to recover against appellant on the note.

While somewhat inartfully drawn, the pleading, we think, fairly alleges the foregoing facts.

The trial court sustained a general demurrer to the answer and special exceptions which were in effect general demurrers to the various specially pleaded defenses; and, upon appellant’s declining to amend, rendered judgment against appellant for the amount of the note and foreclosing the chattel mortgage.

We think the facts pleaded present two complete defenses to the note.

1. Acceptance of the automobile from Riggs in full satisfaction of the debt would have that effect by virtue of the express agreement.

2. The accommodation maker of a note is, upon paying it, entitled to have the collateral, pledged for its payment, surrendered to him (50 O. J. p. 237, § 384); and refusal to so surrender it upon tender of payment would in effect amount to a conversion of the collateral, which would bar recovery upon the note, at least to the extent of the value of the pledge.

While the point is not raised, we direct attention to the fact that the value of the automobile was not pleaded and does not otherwise appear in the record. It is quite generally held that in a suit of this character this is a jurisdictional fact that must affirmatively appear of record. See 11 Tex. Jur. p. 743 et seq.

The trial court’s judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3004 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3004

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the Gullah/Geechee Cultural Heritage Act to extend the 
    authorization for the Gullah/Geechee Cultural Heritage Corridor 
                              Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE GULLAH/GEECHEE 
              CULTURAL HERITAGE CORRIDOR COMMISSION.

    Section 295D(d) of the Gullah/Geechee Cultural Heritage Act (Public 
Law 109-338; 120 Stat. 1833; 16 U.S.C. 461 note) is amended by striking 
``10 years'' and inserting ``15 years''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 24, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3004

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To amend the Gullah/Geechee Cultural Heritage Act to extend the 
    authorization for the Gullah/Geechee Cultural Heritage Corridor 
                              Commission.
```
Exhibit B

Tarot 680mm (DJI A2)

Frame: Tarot 680

Flight Controller: DJI A2

Motors: DJI 3508

Props: DJI 1242

Battery: 8000mah 25c 6s

ESCs: Castle Creations 35
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.1


EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE 
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC. 
401(k) AND MATCHING PLAN 
(Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2013)


THIS EIGHTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. (the “Company”):
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. 401(k) and Matching Plan (the “Plan”);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.3 of the Plan, the Benefit Plan Design Committee (the “Committee”) of the Company maintains the authority to amend the Plan at any time; and
WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan to change matching contributions for participants who are members of the Millwood Union.
NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows.
1.    Section 3.2(d)(ii) of the Plan is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows:
(ii)    Millwood Union.  A Matching Contribution equal to 50% of the first 6% of Pre-Tax Contributions and Pre-Tax Contributions designated as Roth Contributions made by the Employer on such Participant’s behalf during such pay period which are not in excess of 3% of such Participant’s Basic Compensation for such pay period.  Effective January 1, 2018, a Matching Contribution equal to 100% of the first 6% of Pre-Tax Contributions and Pre-Tax Contributions designated as Roth Contributions made by the Employer on such Participant’s behalf during such pay period which are not in excess of 6% of such Participant’s Basic Compensation for such pay period.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further provided that except as provided above, the Plan shall continue to read in its current state.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Eighth Amendment this 28th day of August, 2017 to be effective as specified above.


  	
			
	PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.

	By:
	 
	/s/ Teresa A. Fairbrook

	Name:
	 
	Teresa A. Fairbook

	Title:
	 
	Vice President and Chief Human

	 
	 
	Resources Officer
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2943 

To prohibit the Department of Agriculture from obligating or expending 

any funds for grants awarded for research on the prevention of rose 

rosette disease, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2015 

Mr. SALMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Department of Agriculture from obligating 

or expending any funds for grants awarded for research 

on the prevention of rose rosette disease, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITING GRANT FUNDS FOR RESEARCH 

4 ON THE PREVENTION OF ROSE ROSETTE DIS5 EASE. 

6 (a) PROHIBITION.—The Department of Agriculture 

7 may not obligate or expend any funds for— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2943 IH

1 (1) grant project 2014–51181–22644 of the 

2 National Institute of Food and Agriculture; and 

3 (2) any other grant or cooperative agreement 

4 for research on the prevention of rose rosette dis5 ease. 

6 (b) UNOBLIGATED BALANCES.—Of the amounts 

7 made available for any fiscal year as of the date of the 

8 enactment of this Act for any grant or cooperative agree9 ment of the Department of Agriculture described in sub10 section (a), the unobligated balances of such amounts are 

11 hereby rescinded. 

12 (c) DEFINITION OF ROSE ROSETTE DISEASE.—For 

13 purposes of this section, the term ‘‘rose rosette disease’’ 

14 means a disease believed to be caused by the rose rosette 

15 virus and spread by an eriophyid mite known as 

16 Phyllacoptes fructiphylus. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 18044.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 8, 1936.

Robert W. Dean, of Navasota, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary; punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The indictment is in proper form. The record is before this court without bills of exception or statement of facts. In such condition nothing is presented for review-

The judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE> 1
                                                     Exhibit 10.7

AEtna             Interoffice          Mary Ann Champlin
                  Communication        Aetna Human Resources, RC3A
                                       (860) 273-8371
                                       Fax: (860) 560-8721



To         Daniel P. Kearney

Date       July 22, 1996

Subject    EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

I am pleased to inform you that effective July 19, 1996, Aetna 
Inc. has assumed all of the obligations of Aetna Services, Inc. 
(formerly Aetna Life and Casualty Company) under your Employment 
Agreement with Aetna Services, Inc.  All references to the 
"Company" in your Employment Agreement will hereinafter be deemed 
to mean both Aetna Services, Inc. and Aetna Inc.  Among other 
things, this means that the Change in Control provisions of your 
Employment Agreement would be triggered by a change in control of 
either Aetna Services, Inc. or Aetna Inc.

By way of background, Aetna Inc. became the ultimate parent within 
the Aetna holding company system as a result of the merger with 
U.S. Healthcare.  Your Employment Agreement was entered into with 
Aetna Services, Inc., which is now a direct subsidiary of Aetna 
Inc.  We felt it would be appropriate for the new ultimate parent, 
Aetna Inc., to assume these obligations to place you on an 
equivalent footing post-merger.

The assumption of your Employment Agreement is self-executing.  
You do not need to take any action in response to this letter.  If 
you have any questions or concerns, please let me know.




                                             /s/ Mary Ann Champlin
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Esmark Incorporated
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James P. Bouchard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



|       |  |              |  |                        
|------ |  | ------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: |  | June 9, 2008 |  | /s/ James P. Bouchard  
|       |  |              |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
Exhibit to

this report and should not be considered filed as a part of this report.
# Pacifi c % " ^ JF'*" ^ 

# L.LC
. P.O
. Bo x2028 0 Mesa , Arizon a 85277-028 0 (888 ) 575-454 6 Tol l Fre e www . pacificwings.co m
Marc h14 , 201 1

VI AELECTRONI C MAI L Mr . Kevi n Schlemme r Departmen t o f Transportatio n EA S and Domesti c Analysi s Divisio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E W86-47 1 Washington , DC 2059 0 Dea r Mr . Schlemmer , Pacifi c Wing s i s currentl yevaluatin g variou s subsidize d and non subsidize d EA S servic e model s fo r Jackson , Tennesse e and Owensboro , Kentucky . I n orde r t o provid e time necessar yt o conduc t thoroug hdu e diligence , analysi s and ris k assessment , w e respectfull yreques t a n extensio n o f tim e t o submi t proposal s fo r thes e communities , unti l 1 1 AP R2011 . I sincerel yappreciat e you r attentio n t o thi s request . R espetrCTu3- 1 y , — *
j = » D 3 c r 

### T) r o o r•'•'-••• : : •- '

[-,-.::>•,..:•• - ••4-- ; l a -a'^-.'-i'- - m -'- ; rx i -'•- ' -T-t
. -^ - ^ ^ ^ i =^-7=^r^ 0:=i ^ C'" i

5reg'"Kah'lstor f Chie f Executiv e©"ffice r Pacifi c Wings , L.L.C .