alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21



PARENT AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and Wholly-owned)



National Presto Industries, Inc.

Eau Claire, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)



Its Subsidiaries:


National Holding Investment Company


Wilmington, Delaware (A Delaware Corporation)




Its Subsidiaries:


Presto Manufacturing Company


Jackson, Mississippi (A Mississippi Corporation)




Its Division:


Presto Products Manufacturing Company (Inactive)


Alamogordo, New Mexico




Century Leasing and Liquidating, Inc. (Inactive)


Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota Corporation)




Its Subsidiary:


Presto Export, Inc. (Inactive)


Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota Corporation)




Jackson Sales and Storage Company


Jackson, Mississippi (A Mississippi Corporation)




Canton Sales & Storage Company


Canton, Mississippi (A Mississippi Corporation)




Presto Export, Ltd. (Inactive)


Christiansted, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands (A Virgin Islands Corporation)




National Defense Corporation (Inactive)


Eau Claire, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)




AMTEC Corporation


Janesville, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)




Its Division:


Amron


Antigo, Wisconsin




Its Subsidiary:


Spectra Technologies LLC


East Camden, Arkansas (A Delaware Corporation)




Presto Absorbent Products, Inc.


Eau Claire, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)




Its Division:


Presto Absorbent Products-Atlanta


Marietta, Georgia




NPI Export Corporation (Inactive)


Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota Corporation)




---
# Official Journal L 195/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 195 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 611 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 195

English edition

Legislation

Volume 611 August 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2018/1089 of 22 June 2018 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on administrative cooperation, combating fraud and recovery of claims in the field of value added tax | 1 |
| | | Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on administrative cooperation, combating fraud and recovery of claims in the field of value added tax | 3 |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1090 of 31 July 2018 concerning the authorisation of a preparation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase and endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase produced by Komagataella pastoris (CBS 25376) and Komagataella pastoris (CBS 26469) as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, chickens reared for laying, turkeys for fattening, all avian species reared for laying or for breeding purposes, weaned piglets and minor porcine species (weaned) (holder of the authorisation Kaesler Nutrition GmbH) (
  1
  ) | 23 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2018/1089 of 22 June 2018 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on administrative cooperation, combating fraud and recovery of claims in the field of value added tax

1

Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on administrative cooperation, combating fraud and recovery of claims in the field of value added tax

3

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1090 of 31 July 2018 concerning the authorisation of a preparation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase and endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase produced by Komagataella pastoris (CBS 25376) and Komagataella pastoris (CBS 26469) as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, chickens reared for laying, turkeys for fattening, all avian species reared for laying or for breeding purposes, weaned piglets and minor porcine species (weaned) (holder of the authorisation Kaesler Nutrition GmbH) (
  1
  )

Komagataella pastoris

Komagataella pastoris

1

23

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# I UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 

### 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

# MAY 12011 Mr. Robert D. Fletcher Deputy Executive Officer California Air Resources Board Post Office Box 2815 Sacramo, California 95812 Dear 1 letcher:

On April 5, 2011, the CaliforniaAir Resources Board submitted revisions to the California State Implementation Plan. On May 6, 2011, I wrote to you that EPA had found all revisions in the April 5th submittal complete. Unfortunately, our May 6th letter incorrectly identified several Placer County submittals. I amproviding below a corrected list ofthe submittedrevisions that we found complete on May 6th. APCD/AQMD Rule# RuleTitle Lake County 470 AirToxic Control Measure forEmissions ofToxic PM From In-Use Agricultural Compression Ignition Engines Mojave Desert 1 1 16 Automotive Refinishing Operations PlacerCounty 218 Architectural Coatings PlacerCounty 234 Automotive Refinishing Operations PlacerCounty 236 Wood Products Coating Operations PlacerCounty 238 Factory Coating ofFlat Wood Paneling Sacramento Metropolitan 414 Boilers, Water Heaters and Process Heaters Rated Less than I Million Btu/hr Sacramento Metropolitan 448 Gasoline TransferInto Stationary Storage Containers Sacramento Metropolitan 449 TransferofGasoline Into Vehicle Fuel Tanks Sacramento Metropolitan 451 Surface Coating ofMiscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Sacramento Metropolitan 466 SolventCleaning SanJoaquin Valley 4103 Final StaffReport and Recommendations onAgricultural Burning San Joaquin Valley 4354 Glass Melting Furnaces San Joaquin Valley 4570 ConfinedAnimal Facilities San Joaquin Valley 4612 MotorVehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations San Joaquin Valley 4653 Adhesives and Sealants Santa BarbaraCounty 102 Definitions Santa Barbara County 202 Exemptions to Rule 201 Santa BarbaraCounty 321 Solvent Cleaning Machines and Solvent Cleaning South Coast 1 143 Consumer PaintThinners & Multi Purpose Solvents

Printed an Recvled Paper2

South Coast 1 144 Metalworking Fluids and Direct-Contact Lubricants South Coast 1 171 Solvent Cleaning Operations South Coast I 175 Control ofEmissions from the Manufacture ofPolymeric Cellular (Foam) Products South Coast 2002 Allocations ForOxides ofNitrogen (NOx) and Oxides ofSulfur (Sox) Yolo Solano 2.43 Biomass Boilers

This addresses all revisions in this submittal. In the coming months we will review the complete revisions for action pursuantto Clean Air Act section 110(k).
Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Cynthia G. Allen at 

### (415) 947-4120. Sincerely, 

# /h//t

Deborah Jordan Director, Air Division

cc: Mr. Thomas 

### J. Christofk, APCO Placer County APCD

Mr. Michael Guzzetta, Manager Rule Evaluation Section Stationary Source Division
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

In connection with this quarterly report of ML Systematic Momentum FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Justin C. Ferri, Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  May 13, 2011

 
| By:    | /s/JUSTIN C. FERRI                               |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Justin   C. Ferri                                |   |
|   | Chief   Executive Officer, President and Manager |   |
|   | (Principal   Executive Officer)                  |   |

 

----
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 

Meeting Documentation Date Staff Contact 

Information (Name, email, phone #) 

Name of Organization (Attach list of all attendees names and emails if possible) 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, 

reporting requirements, etc.)

Written ComProvided? Did they also submit to Do

5/13/2010 and 5/14/2010 

Sally Rand, Rand.Sally@epa.gov

202-343-9739 

Partner meeting in Dallas, Texas for EPA’s SF6 Emission 

Reduction Partnership for Electric Power Systems. Partner meeting was hosted by Oncor at the company’s Dallas headquarters. List of attendees is provided below. 

Sally Rand, EPA, delivered presentation on 

“U.S. EPA’s Proposed Amendment to the Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Reporting Rule” covering subparts SS (manufacture of electrical T&D equipment), DD (use of electrical T&D equipment), and QQ (imports and exports of equipment pre-charged with fluorinated GHGs) The presentation centered on the following topics: 

- Definition of an electric power system 

facility. 

- Examples of “electric power entities” 

as referred to in the rule. 

- Scale accuracy and recalibration 

requirements 

- Data reporting requirements 

In addition, a discussion occurred during the meeting regarding scale accuracy and recalibration requirements. The main points and opinions made by Partners during this conversation were as follows: 

- The price of scales increases 

dramatically as the level of accuracy increases. For a scale at a precision of 1%, the cost would be around $2300. For a scale at a precision of 5%, the cost would be around $200. 

- Allegheny currently has 45 scales. 

They would need about 60 to comply 

N/A 
with the requirements in the proposed 

rule. Oncor currently has about 60 scales. 

- Company budgets need to be 

established in Fall, so it would be helpful to know the scale accuracy requirements as early as possible in the calendar year. 

- Scale accuracy requirements should be 

in the +/-3% to +/-5% relative accuracy range to balance cost with accuracy. 

- In order to reduce the reporting 

burden, the rule should only require recalibration per manufacturer specifications and not at least annually.
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Southern Bella, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”)
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) , as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
      the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operation of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
      statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company. and
      will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
                Viola HeitzViola
                Heitz, President, Chief Executive Officer,Principal
                Financial Officer and PrincipalAccounting
                Officer and Director
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 15





Letter Re:  Unaudited Interim Financial Information

Aetna Inc.
Hartford, Connecticut

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re:  Registration Statements No. 333-07169, 333-08427,
333-08429, 333-08431, 333-52321, 333-52321-01, 333-52321-02, 333-52321-03,
333-52321-04, and 333-52321-05.


With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated November 3, 1998 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



                                  /s/  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Hartford, Connecticut
November 3, 1998
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

### October 

### 24, 2006

Catherine Witherspoon, Executive Officer California Air Resources Board Post Office Box 28 15 Sacramento, CA 958

### 12 Dear Ms. Witherspoon: On October 5, 2006, CARB submitted revisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We have reviewed materials submitted with the following rules and found that they fulfill the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 5 1,Appendix V.



## ( Yolo-Solano 

# 1 11.2 

# 1 Confined Animal FacilitiesPermitProgram 

# I This addresses all revisions in this submittal. In the coming months we will review the complete revisions for action pursuant to Clean Air Act section 110(k).

Printed on Recycled Paper

### Questions regarding our completeness review should

### be directed to Cynthia 

### G. Allen at (4-15) 947-4120. 

### Sincerely,

Deborah ~orda6 Director, Air Division
cc: 

### Mr. Eldon Heaston Executive Director Antelope Valley AQMD and

MojaveDesert AQMD 

### Mr. Seyed Sadredin, APCO San Joaquin Valley APCD Dr. 

### Barry Wallerstein,EO South Coast AQMD 

### Mr. Michael 

### J. Villegas, APCO Ventura County APCD 

### Mr. Matt Ehrhardt,APCO Yolo-Solano AQMD 

### Mr. Jorge 

### L. Fernandez, Chief Program Evaluation Branch, CARB
NO. 07-10-0185-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B JUNE 14, 2010

__________________ ____________ OMAR GUERRERO, A/K/A SALVADOR GUERRERO, Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________ ______________ FROM THE 108th DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; NO. 59,732-E; HON. DOUG WOODBURN, PRESIDING

__________________ _____________ ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

__________________ _____________ Before QUINN, C.J., a nd CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Appellant appeals from his conviction for aggravated robbery. Ne ither the clerk’s record nor the reporter’s re cord has been filed. Furthe rmore, a request has been made to extend the deadline by which the appellate record must be filed. Through the request, we are told that appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the appellate record and that no attorney has been appointed to represent him on appeal.2 Accordingly, we abate this appeal and re mand the cause to the 108th District Court of Potter County (trial court) for furt her proceedings. Upon re mand, the trial court shall determine, by reasonable evidentiary procedure it select s, the following: 1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; 2. whether appell ant is indigent; and, if so, 3. whether the appellant is entitl ed to a free appellate record and the appointment of an attorney due to his indigency. The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters (including the name, address, and phone number of any attorney it may appoint to represent appellant in this appeal) in a supplemental reco rd and cause that record to be filed with this court by July 14, 2010. Should furt her time be needed to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before July 14, 2010. In the meantime, all other appellate deadlines are stayed until furt her order of this court. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish.
Exhibit 31.5

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, William David Wood III, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Agilysys, Inc.; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated: July 29, 2020

 

|   |   |
|--------|--------|
|   |   |   |
| By:    |   | /s/ William David Wood III |
|   |   | William David Wood III |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |
1

Filed 9/23/24 P. v. Tomanogi CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

FISAGA TOMANOGI, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant. E083521

(Super.Ct.No. FSB23000947)

OPINION

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Alexander R.

Martinez, Judge. Dismissed.

Matthew Johnson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.2

On September 18, 2023, defendant and appellant Fisaga Tomanogi, Jr.

, pled no

contest to assault by means likely to produce great bodily injury. (Pen. Code, § 245,

subd. (a)(4), count 2

. ) Pursuant to the plea agreement, the court ordered defendant placed

on 24 months of formal probation. 1 The court held the restitution hearing on February

23, 2024. On March 8, 2024, the court ordered defendant to pay $4,1 20 in victim

restitution.

Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d

436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, 2 setting forth a statement of facts, a

statement of the case, and identifying one potentially arguable issue: whether the court

erred in calculating lost wages and moving expenses at the restitution hearing

.

We gave defendant the opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief. We

noted that if he did not do so, we could dismiss the appeal; nevertheless, defendant has

not filed one. Under these circumstances, we have no obligation to independently review

the record for error. ( Delgadillo

, supra , 14 Cal.5th

. at pp. 224

- 231.) Rather, we dismiss

the appeal. ( Id . at pp. 231

- 232.)

1 A term of defendant’s plea provided that if defendant had no violation of his

probation for nine months, the court would reduce the offense from a felony to a

misdemeanor pursuant to Penal Code section 17, subdivision (b).

2 In People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 ( Delgadillo )

, the California

Supreme Court held that Wende and Anders procedures do not apply to appeals from

postjudgment proceedings . ( Delgadillo , at pp. 224

- 226.)3 DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

McKINSTER

J.

We concur:

RAMIREZ

P. J.

MENETREZ

J.
# C_2022426EN.01003501.xml

| 9.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 426/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 426/35

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10950 – OTPP / MAHINDRA / MSPL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 426/02)

On 4 November 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10950. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10950. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---