alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
Calculation of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        Year ended           Three months ended
                                       December 31,              December 31,                    Year ended December 31,
                                     ----------------       --------------------   ------------------------------------------------
                                           2002                2001        2000        2001        2000        1999          1998
                                           ----                ----        ----        ----        ----        ----          ----
<S>                                  <C>                    <C>            <C>     <C>             <C>         <C>
Total interest                                  2,138            681        1590      5,064        6,297        3,667         2,743
Amortization of financing cost                    392            170         333      1,268        1,113          354           278
                                     ----------------       --------------------   ------------------------------------------------

        Fixed charges                           2,530            851       1,923      6,332        7,410        4,021         3,021
                                     ----------------       --------------------   ------------------------------------------------


Pretax income                                  17,907          1,085        (893)     1,419       (6,155)      (8,398)      (10,436)
        Add fixed charges                       2,530            851       1,923      6,332        7,410        4,021         3,021
                                     ----------------       --------------------   ------------------------------------------------

        Adjusted earnings                      20,437          1,936       1,030      7,751        1,255       (4,377)       (7,415)
                                     ----------------       --------------------   ------------------------------------------------


Earnings to fixed charges ratio                   808%           227%         54%       122%          17%        -109%         -245%
                                     ================       ====================   ================================================
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-11348

Summary Calendar

 

KURT WAYNE LOPER,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY JOHNSON, Director,

Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 98-CV-2191

- - - - - - - - - -

April 15, 1999

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kurt Wayne Loper, Texas prisoner # 577692, seeks a

certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal the district

court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for failure to

pay the required $5 filing fee, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

41(b). Loper argues that the district court’s dismissal was

error because the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) does not

apply to habeas cases. His argument misapprehends the facts of

his case: the district court did not order a partial filing fee 
No. 98-11348

- 2 -

under the PLRA but determined that Loper had sufficient funds to

pay the filing fee for a habeas petition rather than proceed in

forma pauperis. 

Loper does not argue that he did not have sufficient funds

to pay the required filing fee. Instead, he argues that the

district court dismissed his case prematurely. Loper contended

in his motion for an extension of time and his post-judgment

motion in the district court and contends in his motion for a COA

in this court that he timely requested that the filing fee be

withdrawn from his inmate account but that, for reasons unknown

to him, the prison delayed payment. 

Although it is unclear whether the district court’s

dismissal was made with or without prejudice, it became

effectively with prejudice due to the operation of the AEDPA’s

one-year statute of limitations provision contained in 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(d)(1). There is no clear record of delay or contumacious

conduct. To the contrary, the record makes clear that payment of

the filing fee was in fact docketed on the same day that the

district court’s dismissal order was entered. The district court

abused its discretion in dismissing Loper’s § 2254 application

pursuant to Rule 41(b). See Berry v. CIGNA/RSI-CIGNA, 975 F.2d

1188, 1191 (5th Cir. 1992).

We therefore GRANT a COA on the issue of the district

court’s dismissal for failure to pay the required filing fee, and

we VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case

to the district court for consideration of the merits of Loper’s
No. 98-11348

- 3 -

habeas claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Whitehead v.

Johnson, 157 F.3d 384, 386, 388 (5th Cir. 1998).

COA GRANTED; JUDGMENT VACATED AND CASE REMANDED.
#### ABRAMS v. STATE.

No. 19354.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 2, 1938.

A. H. Spann, of Navasota, for appellant.

. Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Jpdge.

Conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in dry territory; punishment assessed at a fine of $100.

The information and complaint charge the offense. No statement of facts or bills of exception are in the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 12



                       COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



         CRLP's ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the three months ended
September 30, 2003 and 2002, was 1.60 and 1.83, respectively. CRLP's ratio of
earnings to fixed charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002,
was 1.68 and 1.81, respectively.

         The ratios of earnings to fixed charges were computed by dividing
earnings by fixed charges. For this purpose, earnings consist of pre-tax income
from continuing operations before income, loss from equity investees,
extraordinary gain or loss, gains on sales of properties, distributed income of
equity investees, excluding interest costs capitalized plus fixed charges. Fixed
charges consist of interest expense (including interest costs capitalized) and
amortization of debt issuance costs.
VIII-1

Appendix VIII

2017 Interim Year Emissions Inventory

The interim inventory is an emission inventory selected between the attainment inventory and 

the maintenance inventory to demonstrate that emissions are not anticipated to spike above the 

NAAQS during the maintenance period. The interim inventory chosen for this redesignation 

request is 2017. The 2017 interim year emissions inventory for the New Jersey portion of the 

Northern New Jersey-New York-Connecticut (NNJ-NY-CT) Nonattainment Area is included as 

Attachment 1. The 2017 interim year emissions inventory for the New Jersey portion of the 

Southern New Jersey-Philadelphia (SNJ.-Phila.) Nonattainment Area is included as Attachment 

2. 

The 2017 interim year emissions inventory was prepared with the support of the Mid-Atlantic 

Regional Air Management Association (MARAMA) and its contractors, AMEC Environment and 

Infrastructure and SRA International, Inc. A copy of the Technical Support Document1 prepared 

by AMEC and SRA for MARAMA is included as Attachment 3.

The 2017 interim year emissions inventory includes emissions projections for the following 

sectors:

• EGU Point Sources

• NonEGU Point Sources

• Stationary Area Sources

• Nonroad Mobile Sources

• Onroad Mobile Sources

The 2017 interim year emissions estimates for onroad mobile sources are interpolated values 

based on MARAMA MOVES (Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator Model) results for 2007 and 

2025.

New Jersey updated the wildfire emissions in the 2017 MARAMA inventory, consistent with the 

wildfire update to the 2007 inventory discussed in Appendix V. New Jersey maintained the 

existing growth factor and projected no growth from wildfires from 2007 to 2017, as was done 

previously, but from a different base 2007 emissions.

 1 AMEC and SRA for MARAMA. Technical Support Document for the Development of the 2017/2020 Emission 

Inventory for Regional Air Quality Modeling in the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic Region Version 3.3. AMEC Environment 

and Infrastructure and SRA International, Inc for Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management Association (MARAMA), 

January 23, 2012.
VIII-2

The 2017 MARAMA New Jersey inventory varies slightly from the 2007 and 2025 New Jersey

inventories contained in this SIP revision and discussed in Appendices V and VI for the 

following reasons:

• The New Jersey 2025 SIP inventory for 2025 was adjusted to incorporate a 

conservative rule effectiveness factor for the New Jersey rules (most specifically 

low sulfur fuel and boilers) to reduce anticipated emission reductions. This is 

discussed in more detail in Appendix VI.

• The New Jersey 2007 and 2025 SIP inventories were adjusted to incorporate 

updated pleasure craft emissions based on the latest state specific information.
**Exhibit (23)**

 

**Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants**

 

The Board of Directors 

Potlatch Corporation: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-17145, 333-42808, 33-00805, 33-28220, 33-54515, 333-28079,333-74956, 33-30836, 333-12017 and 333-42806) on Form S-8 of Potlatch Corporation of our report dated January 24, 2003, relating to the balance sheets of Potlatch Corporation and consolidated subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and therelated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002 which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K ofPotlatch Corporation. 

 

KPMG LLP

 

March 7, 2003
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 11, 2019

No. 04-19-00432-CR

Donald BRASSFIELD,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-1733-CR-A

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

ORDER

After we granted court reporter Patricia M. Wagner’s second motion for extension of 

time to file the reporter’s record, we set the record due on December 6, 2019. See TEX. R. APP.

R. 35.3(c). On the twice-extended due date, the court reporter filed a second request for an 

extension of time to file the record until January 7, 2020. 

The reporter’s request is GRANTED. The reporter’s record must be filed with this court 

by January 7, 2020. See id. (limiting any extension in an ordinary appeal to thirty days). 

If the court reporter is unable to file the completed record by January 7, 2020, any further 

request for additional time to file the record must be accompanied by a signed, written status 

report. 

The report must describe the transcript by day with the date, description, page counts, and 

remarks for each day. The page counts must include the total number of pages, the number of 

pages edited, proofread, and formatted into the required electronic form (including bookmarks). 

The report may describe any unusual aspects of the record. The report must describe any 

problems the court reporter reasonably believes may delay the completion of the record beyond 

the requested date. 

The preferred form for the status report, with an accompanying example, is attached. 
_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of December, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
# C_2023336EN.01001001.xml

| 22.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/10

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.106209

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 336/08)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 16.6.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.106209 |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | PUGLIA, CALABRIA, BASILICATA, SARDEGNA, MOLISE, ABRUZZO, CAMPANIA, SICILIA |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Piano di Valutazione in relazione al caso SA. 106194 relativo alla proroga, per il 2023, del regime del credito di imposta per investimenti nel Mezzogiorno e nelle ZES. |
| Legal basis | Articolo 1, commi 265-267, legge 29 dicembre 2022, n. 197 ‘Bilancio di previsione dello Stato per l'anno finanziario 2023 e bilancio pluriennale per il triennio 2023-2025’. |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Regional development (including territorial cooperation) |
| Form of aid | Other forms of tax advantage |
| Budget | Overall budget: 1 512 200 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 1 512 200 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministero dell'economia e delle finanze |
| Dipartimento delle Finanze — Via dei Normanni 5, 00184 Roma |

Date of adoption of the decision

16.6.2023

Aid number

SA.106209

Member State

Italy

Region

PUGLIA, CALABRIA, BASILICATA, SARDEGNA, MOLISE, ABRUZZO, CAMPANIA, SICILIA

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Piano di Valutazione in relazione al caso SA. 106194 relativo alla proroga, per il 2023, del regime del credito di imposta per investimenti nel Mezzogiorno e nelle ZES.

Legal basis

Articolo 1, commi 265-267, legge 29 dicembre 2022, n. 197 ‘Bilancio di previsione dello Stato per l'anno finanziario 2023 e bilancio pluriennale per il triennio 2023-2025’.

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Regional development (including territorial cooperation)

Form of aid

Other forms of tax advantage

Budget

Overall budget: 1 512 200 000 EUR

Annual budget: 1 512 200 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministero dell'economia e delle finanze

Dipartimento delle Finanze — Via dei Normanni 5, 00184 Roma

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA

---
# Official Journal C 211/21 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 211 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4721 August 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 211

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4721 August 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 211/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 211/2 | List of central authorities nominated by the Member States to deal with the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from a Member State and applying Article 3 of Directive 93/7/EEC | 2 |
| 2004/C 211/3 | State aid — Germany — Aid C4/04 (ex N 55/03) — Germany, environmental aid to Wagner GmbH — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1) | 8 |
| 2004/C 211/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3554 — SERCO/NEDRAILWAYS/NORTHERN RAIL JV) (1) | 11 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 211/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 211/2

List of central authorities nominated by the Member States to deal with the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from a Member State and applying Article 3 of Directive 93/7/EEC

2

2004/C 211/3

State aid — Germany — Aid C4/04 (ex N 55/03) — Germany, environmental aid to Wagner GmbH — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1)

8

2004/C 211/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3554 — SERCO/NEDRAILWAYS/NORTHERN RAIL JV) (1)

11

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          62,381
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           8,288
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    244,193
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         504,509
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           503,568
<LOANS>                                      1,531,174
<ALLOWANCE>                                     18,152
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,364,307
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,962,760
<SHORT-TERM>                                   120,774
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             23,236
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,261
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,427
<OTHER-SE>                                     229,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,364,307
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                128,582
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               45,600
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,519
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               175,701
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              73,821
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              82,418
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           93,283
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,125
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (603)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 62,062
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,500
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      25,526
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,526
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.04
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,419
<LOANS-PAST>                                     7,881
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   803
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                17,337
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,170
<RECOVERIES>                                       860
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               18,152
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            12,146
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          6,006
        

</TABLE>
##### 



MAXCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT 23  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORSERNST & YOUNG LLP

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Forms
S-8 No. 33-48351 and S-8 No. 333-67539) pertaining to the Maxco, Inc. Incentive
Stock Option Plan and the Maxco, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan, and in the
related prospectus of our report dated June 11, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Maxco, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2003.

/S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Detroit, Michigan
June 30, 2003
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 12 - RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
Year ended December 31, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIOS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                     1996       1997       1998       1999       2000
                                   ----------------------------------------------------
<S>                                 <C>       <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>
Earnings/(loss):
  Earnings/(loss) before income
    tax expense/(benefit) per
    consolidated statement of
    earnings                         $31.2    $(191.9)   $(38.9)     $ 13.4     $ 57.9

Add:
  Interest expense                    47.4       47.8      57.6        77.4       85.3
  Portion of rent representative
   of an interest factor               9.3       10.7      10.5        10.2       10.1
                                   ----------------------------------------------------

Adjusted earnings/(loss) before
  income tax benefit/(expense)       $87.9    $(133.4)    $29.2      $101.0     $153.3
                                   ----------------------------------------------------

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                   $47.4    $  47.8     $57.6      $ 77.4     $ 85.3
  Portion of rent representative
    of an interest factor              9.3       10.7      10.5        10.2       10.1
  Capitalized interest                 5.1        2.6       2.2         3.0        2.3
                                   ----------------------------------------------------

Total fixed charges                  $61.8    $  61.1    $ 70.3      $ 90.6     $ 97.7
                                   ----------------------------------------------------

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges     1.4(a)     N/A(b)     .4(c)      1.1        1.6
                                   ----------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


(a)  In 1996, the Company recorded a pre-tax expense for restructuring and other
     special charges of $150.0 million ($7.0 million of which was recorded in
     cost of goods sold). Excluding the pre-tax restructuring and other special
     charges, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 3.8.

(b)  Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $194.5 million after
     giving effect to the pre-tax expense for restructuring and other charges of
     $340.0 million ($16.5 million was recorded in cost of goods sold).
     Excluding the pre-tax restructuring and other charges, the ratio of
     earnings to fixed charges was 3.4.

(c)  Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $41.1 million after
     giving effect to the pre-tax expense for restructuring and other charges of
     $50.0 million. Excluding the pre-tax restructuring and other charges, the
     ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 1.1.
# CA2006221EN.01000101.xml

| 14.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 221/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 221/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---