alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MARTINEZ v. STATE.

No. 20016.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 11, 1939.

David E. Hume, of Eagle Pass, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

The judgment was affirmed in an opinion delivered March 1, 1939. A motion for rehearing was overruled on May 24, 1939. Court adjourned for the term June 23, 1939, and its judgment had become final.

On .July 20, 1939, there was lodged with the Clerk of this court appellant’s second-motion for rehearing. Under the following authorities said second motion may not be considered, it having been presented for filing after adjournment for the term. McNeese v. State, 121 Tex.Cr.R. 421, 52 S.W.2d 1049; Burleson v. State, 131 Tex. Cr.R. 76, 96 S.W.2d 785; Silver v. State, 110 Tex.Cr.R. 512, 8 S.W.2d 144, 60 A.L.R. 290; Id.,110 Tex.Cr.R. 512, 9 S.W.2d 358, 60 A.L.R. 290; Hill v. State, 133 Tex. Cr.R. 92, 108 S.W.2d 912; Ralston v. State, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 100, 109 S.W.2d 185.

Appellant’s request for leave to file second motion for rehearing is denied.
# C_2022269EN.01003001.xml

| 13.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/30

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10651 – FAERCH / PACCOR)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 269/08)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Faerch A/S (‘Faerch’, Denmark), a subsidiary of A.P. Møller Holding A/S (‘APMH’, Denmark), |
| --- | --- |

—

Faerch A/S (‘Faerch’, Denmark), a subsidiary of A.P. Møller Holding A/S (‘APMH’, Denmark),

| — | PACCOR Holdings GmbH (‘Paccor’, Germany), indirectly controlled by Goldberg Lindsay & Co. LLC (‘Lindsay Goldberg’, USA). |
| --- | --- |

—

PACCOR Holdings GmbH (‘Paccor’, Germany), indirectly controlled by Goldberg Lindsay & Co. LLC (‘Lindsay Goldberg’, USA).

Faerch will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Paccor.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Faerch is a manufacturer and distributor of rigid plastic packaging, principally for the food industry, as well as an integrated PET recycler and producer, |
| --- | --- |

—

Faerch is a manufacturer and distributor of rigid plastic packaging, principally for the food industry, as well as an integrated PET recycler and producer,

| — | Paccor is a manufacturer and distributor of rigid plastic packaging, principally for the food industry but also for select non-food applications. |
| --- | --- |

—

Paccor is a manufacturer and distributor of rigid plastic packaging, principally for the food industry but also for select non-food applications.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10651 – FAERCH / PACCOR

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3059 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2015 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4500 SE 28th Street, Del City, Oklahoma, 

as the James Robert Kalsu Post Office Building. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

HR 3059 RFS

1 SECTION 1. JAMES ROBERT KALSU POST OFFICE BUILD2 ING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 4500 SE 28th Street, Del City, 

5 Oklahoma, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘James 

6 Robert Kalsu Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘James Robert Kalsu 

11 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal C 197I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 197I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6312 June 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 197I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6312 June 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 197 I/01 | Communication from the Commission — Guidance for a phased and coordinated resumption of visa operations | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 197 I/01

Communication from the Commission — Guidance for a phased and coordinated resumption of visa operations

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Report of Triple A Medical, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the
period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of his knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ P. MORGAN
MCCUNE
              P.
      Morgan McCune
              Sole
      Member of the Board of Directors
              Dated:
      October 21, 2008
              
              
              /s/
      P. MORGAN MCCUNE
              P.
      Morgan McCune
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              Dated:
      October 21, 2008
              
              
              /s/
      P. MORGAN MCCUNE
              P.
      Morgan McCune
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              Dated:
      October 21, 2008
              
              
              /s/
      P. MORGAN MCCUNE
              P.
      Morgan McCune
              Principal
      Accounting Officer
              Dated:
      October 21, 2008




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of




Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
SCWC-24-0000028

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

_______________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, 

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

SHAWN J. MEDEIROS, 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

_______________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-24-0000028; CASE NO. 2CPC-22-0000677)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

Petitioner Shawn J. Medeiros’ application for writ of 

certiorari, filed on July 22, 2024, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, August 22, 2024.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-24-0000028

22-AUG-2024

10:00 AM

Dkt. 5 ODAC
# Official Journal C 104A/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 104A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 493 May 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 104A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 493 May 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2006/C 104A/1 | Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/45/06 to constitute a reserve of Irish-language linguist administrators (AD5) in the field of translation.This competition requires university graduate level of education and no professional experience | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2006/C 104A/1

Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/45/06 to constitute a reserve of Irish-language linguist administrators (AD5) in the field of translation.This competition requires university graduate level of education and no professional experience

EPSO/AD/45/06

(AD5)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas** 

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00755

- CR

Jonathan Andrew PERALES

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR0068

Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED January 8, 2020.

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Order filed, May 30, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00284

- CV

____________ ROBIN D. BAIWIR AND STACY L. BAIWIR , Appellant

V.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A ., OCWEN LOAN SERVIC ING, LLC AND U.S.

BANK, NATIONAL ASSOC IATIO N , Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 43636



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 12, 2014

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Cynthia Berry , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 d ays of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Rewards Network Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference intopreviously filed registration statements on Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-53147, 333-49366 and 333-111390) and on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-101237, 333-72501, 333-06747, 333-115903, 333-134441, and 333-143159) of Rewards Network Inc. andsubsidiaries (the Company) of our reports dated March 17, 2008, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equityand comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007, annual report on Form 10-K of the Company. 

Our report on the consolidatedfinancial statements refers to Rewards Network Inc.’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payments,” and Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting BulletinNo. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in the Current Year Financial Statements*,*” effective January 1, 2006.
Page 47 of 51

EXHIBIT 23.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our reports
dated March 10, 2005 accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule, and managements assessment of internal
control over financial reporting. Both reports are included in the annual report of National Presto Industries, Inc. and
subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
reports in the Registration Statement of National Presto Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 33-46711,
effective March 27, 1992).

/S/   Grant Thornton LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 10, 2005

---
# Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District

JANUARY 7, 2016

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b).

1. Case No. SD33836

Re: JEROME POOLE, Appellant,

vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent.

2. Case No. SD34013

Re: IN THE INTEREST OF: S.D.B.,
A CHILD UNDER SEVENTEEN
YEARS OF AGE. R.D.B., Appellant,

vs. GREENE COUNTY JUVENILE OFFICE, Respondent.
Exhibit 21


                          PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES INC.

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                               September 30, 1997


                                                                     Percentage
                                                                      of Voting
                                                    State of         Securities
Subsidiary Name                                   Incorporation         Owned
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Piper Jaffray Inc.                                   Delaware            100%

Piper Jaffray International Inc.                     Delaware            100%
(a wholly owned subsidiary of Piper Jaffray Inc.)

Piper Capital Management Incorporated                Delaware            100%

Piper Trust Company                                  Minnesota           100%

Premier Acceptance Corporation                       Delaware            100%

Piper Realty Management Incorporated                 Delaware            100%

Piper Jaffray Ventures, Inc.                         Delaware            100%
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3004 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3004

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
           the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen

                                 An Act

 
    To amend the Gullah/Geechee Cultural Heritage Act to extend the 
    authorization for the Gullah/Geechee Cultural Heritage Corridor 
                               Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE GULLAH/GEECHEE 
CULTURAL HERITAGE CORRIDOR COMMISSION.
    Section 295D(d) of the Gullah/Geechee Cultural Heritage Act (Public 
Law 109-338; 120 Stat. 1833; 16 U.S.C. 461 note) is amended by striking 
``10 years'' and inserting ``15 years''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
1)
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Preformed Line Products Company for the
period ended December 31, 2008 which this certification accompanies fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Preformed Line
Products Company.
 March 13, 2009
    /s/ Eric R. GraefEric R. GraefChief Financial Officer and
Vice President  Finance
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Appendix 7 

GREENHOUSE WARMING 

POTENTIALS 2007

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL 

ON CLIMATE CHANGE 

PARTII SECTION B QUESTION 2 

 GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIAL 

 (TIME HORIZON) 

SPECIES CHEMICAL LIFETIME AND 100 YEARS 

 FORMULA REFERENCE 

CARBON DIOXIDE CO2 BERN MODEL, 1 

 REVISED 

 

 

HCF 143a CH3CF3 52 4470 

HFC 125 C2HF5 29 3500 

HFC 32 CH2F27 4.9 675 

HFC 134a CH2FCF3 14 1430 

HFC 227ea CF3CHFCF3 34.2 3220 

HFC152a CH3CHF2 1.4 124
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of New York Residential, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Kornstein, President and Chief Executive
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:       December
15, 2008








By:
                    /s/
      Robert KornsteinName:
                    Robert
      KornsteinTitle:
                    President
      and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
  Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Portsmouth Square, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I David
T. Nguyen, Treasurer and Controller of the Company, serving as Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: September 29, 2003                        /s/ David T. Nguyen
                                                ----------------------------
                                                David T. Nguyen, Treasurer
                                                and Controller (serving as
                                                Chief Financial Officer)




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Portsmouth Square, Inc. and will be retained by Portsmouth Square,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
#### WHITE v. STATE.

No. 19728.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 9, 1938.

For former opinion, see 120 S.W.2d 452.

Art Schlofman, of Dalhart, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant requests leave- to file second motion for rehearing. The case was disposed of originally without discussion of his bills of exception because they could not be appraised in the absence of a statement of facts. It appeared on original motion for rehearing that the statement of facts was then before the court and that its absence originally was no fault of appellant. We then on motion for rehearing for the first time discussed the bills of exception and disposed of the case on its merits. The present motion is really the first motion on the merits, hence we permit same to be filed.

The present motion challenges our disposition of appellant’s complaint based on a denial of a continuance. We have carefully re-rexamined bill of exception No. 1 which brings forward the complaint mentioned and are confirmed in the view expressed originally that the court committed no error in refusing the continuance. The learned trial judge approved the bill with the following qualification : “ * * * this was defendant’s second motion for continuance; it had been postponed twice at the request of the defendant to procure testimony of these same witnesses besides their two motions for a continuance.” This qualification having been accepted without objection from appellant would warrant this court in overruling appellant’s complaint without further observation. However, we note that as to the witness Valdez; he was known to be a resident of New Mexico. No effort was made to secure his evidence by deposition, but process was served on him on some occasion when he was in Texas. The trial court was in no position to *806enforce obedience to said process, the witness being a non-resident. See 9 Tex. Jur., Sec. 105, p. 795, and cases there cited.

It is apparent that the diligence sworn to by appellant in his application for continuance as to efforts to take depositions of the other witnesses is based largely on hearsay, appellant having been in jail and necessarily having no personal knowledge of the matters averred. There is no affidavit from appellant’s attorney or other parties who might know the facts. We fail to perceive any substantial reason .why the depositions of these witnesses could not have been secured by proper diligence.

Appellant’s second motion for re-hearing is denied.
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement No. 33-41204 on Form S-8, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8 No. 333-04888, and Nos. 333-14925, 333-43018, 333-109322, 333-109324, and 333-109327 on Forms S-8 and No. 333-157695 onForm S-3 of our report dated February 26, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Brown & Brown, Inc. and subsidiaries (“Brown & Brown”), and the effectiveness of Brown & Brown’sinternal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Brown & Brown for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Jacksonville, Florida 

February 26, 2010