alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Portsmouth Square, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David T. Nguyen, Treasurer and Controller of the Company, serving as its Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





·
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 5(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





·
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ David T. Nguyen


David T. Nguyen


Treasurer and Controller


(Principal Financial Officer)





Date: September 21, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Portsmouth Square, Inc. and will be retained by Portsmouth Square, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-1258

___________________________ Phelipe A. Linstrom lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. Quiktrip Corporation lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________ Submitted: August 30, 2021 Filed: September 2, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before BENTON, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Phelipe Linstrom appeals following the district court’s 1 denial of his motion for a new jury trial in his civil action. He argues that the district court abused its

1 The Honorable David Gregory Kays, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.discretion in sustaining Quiktrip Corporation’s objections to portions of the

deposition testimony of Linstrom’s expert witnesses and not allowing those portions to be read to the jury. After careful review, we conclude that the ruling was proper for the reasons stated by the district court, and the district court therefore did not abuse its discretion. See McPheeters v. Black & Veatch Corp., 427 F.3d 1095, 1101 (8th Cir. 2005) (“[W]e accord the district court wide discretion in admitting and excluding evidence, and its decision will not be disturbed unless there is a clear and prejudicial abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted)). Morever, Linstrom has not shown that the district court’s ruling substantially influenced the jury’s verdict. See id. (“We will not reverse a judgment on the basis of erroneous evidentiary rulings absent a showing that those rulings had a substantial influence on the jury’s verdict.”). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
#### Alice HOOTEN, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. A. HOOTEN, Defendant in Error.

No. 5463.

Supreme Court of Texas.

June 10, 1931.

R. D. Allen, of Sulphur Springs, for plaintiff in error.

Dial & Brim, of Sulphur Springs, for defendant in error.

GREENWOOD, J.

The plaintiff in error presents the same questions we have determined adversely to her contentions in an opinion this day filed, John Cunningham v. Rozelle Cunningham et al., 40 S.W.(2d) 46. In accordance with the conclusions in that opinion, the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals should be, and is, affirmed.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Symons International Group, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form
10-Q  for  the  period  ending  March  31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruce K. Dwyer, Chief
Financial  Officer  of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/Bruce  K.  Dwyer
-------------------
Bruce  K.  Dwyer
Chief  Financial  Officer
July  15,  2003


     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Symons International Group, Inc. and will be retained by the
Company  and  furnished  to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1










CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Michael Ceccon, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Kitcher Resources Inc. hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kitcher Resources Inc. for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Kitcher Resources Inc.





Date: April 3, 2012





/s/ "Michael Ceccon"Michael Ceccon

President, Chief Executive Officer





/s/ "Michael Ceccon"Michael Ceccon

Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kitcher Resources Inc. and will be retained by American Resources Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal C 134A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.134.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 134A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 558 May 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.134.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 134A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 558 May 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2012/C 134A/01 | Recruitment to the European Medicines Agency (London) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Medicines Agency

2012/C 134A/01

Recruitment to the European Medicines Agency (London)

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |
| 22 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (FR) |
| 31 | (ES) |
| 37 | |
| 44 | |
| 46 | |
| 53 | |
| 55 | |
| 59 | |
| 69 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 70 | (EL) |
| 71 | (ES) |
| 74 | (HU) |
| 75 | (NL) |
| 76 | |
| 77 | (RO) |
| 84 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 86 | |
| 90 | (EN) |
| 101 | |
| 110 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 114 | |
| 121 | (BG) |
| 122 | |
| 134 | |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

22

(DE/EN/FR)

27

30

(FR)

31

(ES)

37

44

46

53

55

59

69

(DE/EN/FR)

70

(EL)

71

(ES)

74

(HU)

75

(NL)

76

77

(RO)

84

(DE/EN/FR)

86

90

(EN)

101

110

(DE/EN/FR)

114

121

(BG)

122

134

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John C. Francis, Chief Financial Officer of Consolidation Services, Inc., Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(a)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: November 21, 2007

CONSOLIDATION SERVICES, INC.





By: /s/ John C. Francis

John C. Francis

Chief Financial Officer







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Consolidation Services, Inc. and will be retained by Consolidation Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the quarterly  report of New Century Equity Holdings
Corp.  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof, I, Steven
J. Pully, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge that:

(1)      The Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended  September  30, 2006,  filed
         with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 20, 2006, fully
         complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended
         September  30, 2006 fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
         financial  condition and results of  operations  of New Century  Equity
         Holdings Corp.

By: /s/ Steven J. Pully                              Date: November 20, 2006
    -----------------------------                          ---------------------
Steven J. Pully
Chief Executive Officer
```
<PAGE>
 
                                   Exhibit 23
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Pitt-Des Moines, Inc. of our report dated March 3, 1999, included in the
Pitt-Des Moines, Inc. 1998 Annual Report.

Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of Pitt-Des Moines,
Inc. listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (No. 333-34787) pertaining to the Stock Option Plan of 1990 of Pitt-
Des Moines, Inc.; Form S-8 (No. 333-13043) pertaining to the Pitt-Des Moines,
Inc. Directors Stock Plan; Form S-8 (No. 333-68853) pertaining to the Pitt-Des
Moines, Inc. Long Term Incentive Stock Plan of 1997 of our report dated March 3,
1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein
by reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to
the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
Pitt-Des Moines, Inc.



Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 29, 1999

                                                          /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP
#### MURPHY v. STATE.

No. 14551.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 25, 1931.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 17, 1932.

Ashworth, Crisp *&*Ashworth, of Kaufman, for appellant.

*616Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW P. J.

The offense is theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for four years.

The stolen property consisted of four sets of harness. The injured party testified that the value of the harness was $63.90. He qualified as to knowledge of the value. There was an extended cross-examination of the witness, upon which is based the contention that the evidence did not prove the value of the stolen property to exceed $50, and that 1⁄83⁄8 court should not have instructed the jury upon felony theft.

The testimony is quite sufficient to sustain the action of the court and to support the terdict of the jury.

The .judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

LATTIMORE, J.

The indictment charged theft of harness of the value of $63.90 and certain bushels of oats of the value of $19.60. The proof showed the theft of all of said property. The trial court saw fit to submit the case in his charge mentioning only the harness. Appellant complains in his motion for ‘ rehearing that we erred in holding the testimony sufficient to establish the value of the harness as more than $50. The owner of said harness testified that the market value of said harness at the time it was taken was $63.90. Appellant is in no position to complain at the method or manner of proving the value of said harness. He made no objection to the testimony of said owner. He took no bill of exception showing -complaint of the method or manner of such proof. In the absence of a bill of exception showing that objection was made in the trial court, such complaint is of no avail here. Ramon v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 98 S. W. 872; Thomas v. State, 85 Tex. Cr. R. 246, 211 S. W. 453; Cunningham v. State, 90 Tex. Cr. R. 500, 236 S. W. 90.

The motion for rehearing will be overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INOFRMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE EXODUS
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN THIS ENTIRETY BY REFERNCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         863,448
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,208
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               981,688
<PP&E>                                         582,578
<DEPRECIATION>                                  78,564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,827,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          204,609
<BONDS>                                      1,391,049
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           202
<OTHER-SE>                                     231,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,827,182
<SALES>                                        134,142
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,142
<CGS>                                           94,661
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,113
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,862
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (58,350)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,350)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,350)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)


</TABLE>
----

**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant toRule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)**

I, Sidong Zhang, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China DashengBiotechnology Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2008; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small businessissuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small businessissuer and have: 

> 
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s secondfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

> 
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internalcontrols over financial reporting. 

Date: February 18, 2009 

/s/ Sidong Zhang                                           Sidong Zhang, Chief Executive Officer 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-20407

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RUFINO CERDA-ESQUIVEL,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-01-CR-848-ALL

--------------------

February 20, 2003

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Rufino Cerda-Esquivel was convicted after a guilty plea to

illegal reentry into the United States after deportation, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and was sentenced to 24 months’

imprisonment. He argues that his prior felony conviction for

possession of cocaine did not merit the district court’s

eight-level adjustment as provided in § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) for an

aggravated felony. Cerda’s arguments regarding the definitions

of “drug trafficking offense” and “aggravated felony” for
No. 02-20407

-2-

purposes of the sentencing guidelines were recently rejected

by this court in United States v. Caicedo-Cuero, 312 F.3d 697,

706-707 (5th Cir. 2002). 

Cerda also argues that drug possession is not an aggravated

felony under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(a)(43)(B) and 1326(b)(2), but he

concedes that his argument is foreclosed by our precedent in

United States v. Rivera, 265 F.3d 310 (5th Cir. 2001), cert.

denied, 534 U.S. 1146 (2002), and United States v. HinojosaLopez, 130 F.3d 691 (5th Cir. 1997), and he raises the issue

only to preserve it for possible Supreme Court review. 

Based on the foregoing, the district court did not err in

assessing an eight-level adjustment.

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REG ION 10

Mr. Uri Papish Acting Air Director 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle , WA 98101-3140 

## JAN 

## 2I 2014

· >

Oregon Department ofEnvironmental Quality 811 SW Sixth Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204-1390 Dear Mr. Papish: OFFICE OF AIR , WASTE AND TOXICS

We are writing in response to your December 27, 2013 , State 'Implementation Plan submittal to meet the infrastructure requirements ofthe Clean Air Act for the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide (N02 ) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). We have performed a completeness review ofyour submittal against the completeness criteria set forth at 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V. We have determined that your submittal satisfies the completeness criteria and we have started processing your submittal. Please note that a finding ofcompleteness indicates that the submittal meets the minimum criteria that a plan must satisfy for the Environmental Protection Agency to review the submittal under 40 CFR §51.103. A completeness finding does not constitute a finding on the merits of the submittal or whether it meets the relevant criteria for SIP approval. Ifyou or members ofyour staffhave any questions on this topic, please contact Kristin Hall at (206) 553-6357 or hall.kristin@epa.gov. Thank you for your continued efforts to protect air quality.

Cc: David Collier, ODEQ



## 0 Printed on RecycledPaper
|                               |
|-------------------------------|
|                               |  |  |
| DATED: November 12, 2013 |   | /s/ T. Michael Price |
|                          |   | T. Michael Price |
|                          |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |