alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
______________________________________________________________ Page is not included in this copy. Pages 115 through 118 are not included in this copy.

_________________________________________________________________ The material not included contains the following type of information:

__ __ Identity of product inert ingredients.

__ __ Identity of product impurities.

__ __ Description of the product manufacturing process.

__ __ Description of quality control procedures. _____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. _____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. _____ A draft product label.

__ X __ The product confidential statement of formula. _____ Information about a pending registration action.

__ __ FIFRA registration data. _____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. _____ The document is not responsive to the request. _____ Internal deliberative information. _____ Attorney-Client work product.

__ __ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the Agency. The information not included is generally considered confidential by product registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who prepared the response to your request.

_________________________________________________________________
#### LANDRUM v. STATE.

No. 15072.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 16, 1932.

iSam T. Holt, of Carthage, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, J.

The offense is transporting intoxicating liquor; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two and one-half years.

Appellant was observed by an officer to drive his car to a store, where he stopped. After the car had stopped, appellant ran through the store followed by the officer and other parties. As he went out the back door <of the store, he tried to throw a bottle of whisky against the wall. The bottle failed to break, and the officer secured the whisky. Appellant attempted to hold the officer. A scuffle ensued in which the officer was compelled to strike appellant with his pistol in order to disengage himself. Appellant had' the odor of whisky on his breath. The foregoing facts were testified to by the arresting officer.

Appellant took the witness stand and denied that he transported the whisky or had it in his possession at the time the officer sought to arrest him. He said that he ¡was doing nothing, and declared that the officer jumped on him and struck him with his pistol without provocation.

One bill' of exception is brought forward. It appears from this bill that appellant objected to the introduction in evidence of the bottle of whisky on the ground that it had not been labeled. It is appellant’s contention that under the provisions of article 692, P. C., in the absence of a label showing appellant’s name and the date of seizure, it was improper to receive the whisky in evidence. The officer testified- that the whisky introduced in evidence was taken from appellant on the occasion in question. It has been held by this court that the failure to comply with the provisions of article 692, supra, is not an impediment to the use of the officer as a witness to .facts within his knowledge relating to the seizure of the property, the identity of the possessor, and other incidents of the transaction. Austin v. State, 97 Tex. Cr. R. 360, 261 S. W. 1035. The bill of exception, in our opinion, falls to reflect error.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.-

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals, and approved by the court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

MORROW, P. J.

An examination of the record in the light of the motion for rehearing leaves us of *771the opinion that the former decision was correct.

The point raised in the motion is that the testimony of the sheriff, identifying the bottle of whisky which was produced upon the trial as the one which he had received from the appellant, was improperly received. We think the matter was properly disposed of in the original opinion. See McDonough v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 39 S.W.(2d) 886; Kelly v. State, 102 Tex. Cr. R. 395, 278 S. W. 449.

The motion is overruled.
# C_2023301EN.01000501.xml

| 25.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/5

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.108173

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 301/04)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 10.8.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.108173 |
| Member State | Austria |
| Region | Austria |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19: Richtlinien zum Schadensausgleich durch die COVID-19 Finanzierungsagentur des Bundes |
| Legal basis | ABBAG-Gesetz, insb. § 3b Abs. 3 idgF (BGBl. I Nr. 228/2021), Verordnung des Bundesministers für Finanzen gemäß § 3b Abs.3 des ABBAG-Gesetzes: Richtlinien zum Schadensausgleich durch die COVID-19 Finanzierungsagentur des Bundes (Richtlinien zum Schadensausgleich) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Compensation of damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 750 000 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 750 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2024 |
| Economic sectors | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | COVID-19 Finanzierungsagentur des Bundes GmbH (COFAG) |
| A — 1020 Wien, Taborstraße 1 — 3 |

Date of adoption of the decision

10.8.2023

Aid number

SA.108173

Member State

Austria

Region

Austria

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19: Richtlinien zum Schadensausgleich durch die COVID-19 Finanzierungsagentur des Bundes

Legal basis

ABBAG-Gesetz, insb. § 3b Abs. 3 idgF (BGBl. I Nr. 228/2021), Verordnung des Bundesministers für Finanzen gemäß § 3b Abs.3 des ABBAG-Gesetzes: Richtlinien zum Schadensausgleich durch die COVID-19 Finanzierungsagentur des Bundes (Richtlinien zum Schadensausgleich)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Compensation of damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 750 000 000 EUR

Annual budget: 750 000 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2024

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

COVID-19 Finanzierungsagentur des Bundes GmbH (COFAG)

A — 1020 Wien, Taborstraße 1 — 3

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA

---
Order entered December 5, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00811-CR

CHAZMON MONTREL BLACKSHEAR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-58305-M

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

On September 16, 2016, we ordered the trial court to hold a hearing to determine why the 

reporter’s record had not been filed. On November 29, 2016, the reporter’s record was filed. In 

the interest of expediting this appeal and because findings are no longer necessary, we VACATE

that portion of the September 16, 2016 order requiring the trial court hold a hearing and make 

findings.

We ORDER the reporter’s record filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John V. Winfield, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Portsmouth Square,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: April 25, 2006                          /s/ John V. Winfield
                                              ---------------------------
                                              John V. Winfield, President
                                              and Chief Executive Officer
### JM N 1 \SAi.,AZA R.;, ., . .

iNNi. N rdi i >i

i O n I I I i di i i.:r.i - .>.02-22ti-'-iCii>' ) IFA M 

## T•'.•i,„,„«v>, . DEPARTMEN TO F %iJ|li y TRANSPORTATiO N Hous e o f iRcptcGcnttitwc s KHaaliington. M 2051 5 DCKE T OPERATION

S OCI- i AiGv2 1 Aueiist23,201 0 Aloh aLey Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave. , SE , WS6-31 0 Wasliim-ion . D C 2059 0

' a ' RE : Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

gran t fo r th e Tellurid c Regiona l Airpor t Dea r Ms . Ley : i a mwritin g i

n support o f th e Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

gran t applicatio n submitte db y th e Telkirid e Regiona l Aiipor t i n Sa n Migue l County , Colorado . Th e airport seek s fund s fromth e U.S . Dei)artmen t

o f Transportatio n t o acquir e asecon dsumme r carrie r an dto increas e flight s t

o Denver . Expandin g coverag e t o thi s smal l airport woul dgreatly benefi t

consumer s an dth e regional economy . Increase dcoverag e woul dcreat e opportunitie s for increase dflight

availabilit y an dth e potentia l fo r cos t reductio n o f

flight s du e t o th e competitio n amon g carriers . Th e Teilurid e Regional Aiipor t i s a n importan t

economi c hu b i

n southwes t

Colorad o fo

r tourism , business ; an dth e local community . I n 2008 , th e airport

brough t i n a n estimate d$14 0 millio n i n economi c activit y fo

r th e region . Enhancement s mad e possibl e wit h thi s gran t

fundin g woul dsupport th e sustainabilit y o f

thi s airport

i n th e future . Thank yo u fo r you r consideratio n o f

th e Teilurid e Regional Airport' s gran t proposal . Pleas e kee p my Durang o offic e informe do f an y developments.relate dt o thi s grant .

Sincerely ,

' I Joh n T . Salazar Membe r o f Congres s

.Vrs i V . STUfir

r -n ^ NC^KI I I .VI I • SIRUITI- . STI2 70 ? W ) MAI N S I liKur . p( > S1 3 MAI N A vr.NUi: , S I H .'0 0 iii.o . C O S1011. 1 GRAN D JI'N V IICN , C O 8130 1 ALAMOSA , ("(J S II0 1 D i UIANGO . C O K i *0 1
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of SURFACE COATINGS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  August 13, 2010





/s/ Rick Pietrykowski





Name: Rick Pietrykowski


Title:  Chief Executive Officer











Dated:  August 13, 2010





/s/ Rick Pietrykowski





Name: Rick Pietrykowski


Title:  Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS STATEMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOW, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000077242
<NAME> PG ENERGY INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  262,977,000
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  4,459,000
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      67,308,000
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    36,396,000
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             371,140,000
<COMMON>                                    33,142,000
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                   32,677,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         41,606,000
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             107,425,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          640,000
<PREFERRED>                                 15,864,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       129,500,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                           2,170,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>               24,776,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       80,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              90,685,000
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>              371,140,000
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                  190,567,000
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         7,321,000
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 161,283,000
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 168,604,000
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     21,963,000
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             100,000
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              22,063,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     9,950,000
<NET-INCOME>                                12,113,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                  1,312,000
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>               10,801,000
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       127,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                    4,837,000
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      14,769,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.49
        

</TABLE>
Tom Kilpatrick

6412 Briarwood Lane

Nichols Hills, OK 73116-5612

January 20, 2016

Mr. John S. Duncan, Director

Flight Standards Service

Federal Aviation Administration

Re: FAA Section 333 Exemption No. 12152

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1661

Mr. Duncan: 

I petition the FAA to amend Exemption No. 12152 to Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1661 for operations up to 400 feet 

AGL and within five miles of Wiley Post Airport (KPWA) in Oklahoma City, OK. 

I have operated UAVs for 12 months without incident, gaining experience and mastering flight controls of a variety of 

systems including the DJI Inspire 1. Many of these flights have taken place in a variety of controlled airspaces around the United 

States to an altitude of 400 feet AGL and within five miles of airports (including Wiley Post Airport) with permission of local air 

traffic controllers. Some of these flights involved the use of handheld aviation radios. 

These are my Methods of Operation to be applied to these requested flights (using the reference “we” in speaking of the PIC 

and Visual Observer): 

 We will survey the area in which we propose to operate for hazards to flight (trees, power lines, towers, etc.). We 

will not operate over crowds or crowded highways. 

 We will preflight the aircraft prior to all flights to ensure airworthiness. 

 We will launch only after successfully performing a magnetic compass calibration. 

 We will launch only when adequate satellite reception has been acquired that identifies the “home point.” 

 We will launch to a height of approximately 10 feet and exercise all flight controls (forward, backward, left, right, 

yaw left and yaw right) at 100% control stick deflection. 

 We will rarely go above 200 feet AGL, but occasionally to 400 feet AGL to provide visual perspective. 

 We will remain within 1,000 feet of the launch point. 

 We will return to the launch point and land when battery power indicates 30%. 

 We will conduct a postflight inspection immediately after landing to verify that no damage has occurred. 

 When within five miles of an airport we will communicate with appropriate FAA air traffic controllers prior to and 

following flight operations, and during operations if requested. 

 When within five miles of an airport we will monitor local Tower or CTAF radio frequencies during operations, and 

when necessary report the UAV’s position to manned aircraft. 

 We will give way to all manned aircraft (fixed wing and helicopters). 

I believe that approval of this petition will serve the public safely providing aerial photography and videography up to 400 

feet AGL and within five miles of Wiley Post Airport, while maintaining a positive communication link between UAV operator and

air traffic controllers. 

Sincerely, 

Tom Kilpatrick
EXHIBIT 10.22

                            CPI AEROSTRUCTURES, INC.
                              200A EXECUTIVE DRIVE
                            EDGEWOOD, NEW YORK 11717


October 28, 2004

Mr. Arthur August
7155 Wainscott Court
Sarasota, FL  34238

Dear Mr. August:

         This letter will serve to extend and amend the employment agreement,
 dated August 14, 2001 ("Employment Agreement") between you and CPI
 Aerostructures, Inc. ("Company"), effective as of January 1, 2005. Except as
 herein amended, all of provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in
 full force and effect.

         1.    From January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005, you shall be
employed by the Company as its Chairman Emeritus and Section 1.1 of the
Employment Agreement shall be deemed amended accordingly.

         2.    Your "Base Salary" during calendar year 2005 shall be at the
annual rate of not less than $60,000 and Section 2.1 of the Employment Agreement
shall be deemed amended accordingly.

         3.    You shall not be entitled to a "Bonus" for the 2005 calendar year
under Section 2.2 of the Employment Agreement or any additional option grants
under Section 2.3 of the Employment Agreement.

         4.    The "Employment Term" under Section 3 of the Employment Agreement
shall continue until December 31, 2005.

         5.    The "Non-compete Fee" under Section 4.7(d) of the Employment
Agreement shall be paid in accordance with the terms of the Employment
Agreement, with the first installment thereof to be paid on January 1, 2006.

         6.    You have agreed to terminate your existing "10(b)5-1 Plan"
effective as of the date hereof.

         If this adequately sets forth our understanding with respect to your
Employment Agreement, please sign in the space provided below and return it to
the undersigned.
                                      Sincerely,

                                      CPI AEROSTRUCTURES, INC.


                                      By:    /s/ Edward J. Fred
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Edward J. Fred
                                             President and CEO
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:


      /s/ Arthur August
-----------------------------
         ARTHUR AUGUST