alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023327EN.01001201.xml

| 15.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/12

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107220

(2023/C 327/11)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 2.8.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107220 |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Forestry Programme 2023 — 2027 |
| Legal basis | Forestry Act 2014, as amended; Forestry Act 1988; Forestry (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2020 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas, Aid for co-operation in forestry sector, Environmental protection, Aid for co-operation in forestry sector |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 308 309 066 EUR
  Annual budget: 0 EUR |
| Intensity | 100,0  % |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2027 |
| Economic sectors | AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING, Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities, Plant propagation, Forestry and logging |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine |
| EU Division, Agriculture House, Kildare Street, Dublin 2 |

Date of adoption of the decision

2.8.2023

Aid number

SA.107220

Member State

Ireland

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Forestry Programme 2023 — 2027

Legal basis

Forestry Act 2014, as amended; Forestry Act 1988; Forestry (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2020

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas, Aid for co-operation in forestry sector, Environmental protection, Aid for co-operation in forestry sector

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 308 309 066 EUR

Annual budget: 0 EUR

Intensity

100,0  %

Duration

Until 31.12.2027

Economic sectors

AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING, Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities, Plant propagation, Forestry and logging

Name and address of the granting authority

Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine

EU Division, Agriculture House, Kildare Street, Dublin 2

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA

---
Exhibit 24.7
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
  (1)
    
    To execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigneds
capacity as a director and/or officer of Spartech Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the Company), Form 10-K in accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules thereunder;(2)
    
    To do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which
may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 10-K complete
and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such form with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or similar
authority; and(3)
    
    To take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to, in
the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being understood
that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the undersigned
pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall contain such
terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such
attorney-in-facts discretion.
   th
 /s/ Jackson W. RobinsonSignatureJackson W. RobinsonPrint Name
#### HARRISON v. STATE.

No. 16805.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 16, 1934.

J. T. Lindsey, of Port Arthur, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Aggravated assault is the offense; penalty assessed at a fine of $100.

The evidence heard in the trial court is not brought up for review.

The complaint and information appear regular. No fault in the procedure has been perceived or pointed out which would authorize this court to order a reversal of the judgment of conviction.

The attacks upon the sufficiency of the .evidence set up in the motion for new trial cannot be considered, as this court has not before it the statement of facts to verify the correctness of the complaints and appraise their effect. Likewise, the criticisms of the court’s charge cannot be appraised in the absence of the evidence which was before the trial judge and upon which the charge is based. In the absence of a showing to the *520contrary, the presumption in favor of the court’s rulings upon the admission and rejection of the evidence must prevail upon appeal.

The judgment is affirmed.
AMERICAN PREMIER UNDERWRITERS, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

   EXHIBIT 12 - COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                        (Dollars in Millions)


                                            Year Ended December 31,
                                        1996    1995    1994    1993    1992

Pretax income excluding
  discontinued operations             $332.3  $113.0  $ 41.2  $190.1  $ 84.1

Less undistributed equity in
  (earnings) losses of affiliates        4.4     2.7      -       -       -

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                      38.8    44.9    53.2    62.8    69.6
  One-third of rentals                   3.7     4.4     4.3     4.4     4.4

    EARNINGS                          $379.2  $165.0  $ 98.7  $257.3  $158.1



Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                    $ 38.8  $ 44.9  $ 53.2  $ 62.8  $ 69.6
  One-third of rentals                   3.7     4.4     4.3     4.4     4.4

    FIXED CHARGES                     $ 42.5  $ 49.3  $ 57.5  $ 67.2  $ 74.0



Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges      8.92    3.35    1.72    3.83    2.14

Earnings in Excess of Fixed Charges   $336.7  $115.7  $ 41.2  $190.1  $ 84.1





                                 E-4
VIII

- 1 Appendix VIII 2017 Interim Year Emissions Inventory
The interim inventory is an emission inventory selected between the attainment inventory and the maintenance inventory to demonstrate that emissions are not anticipated to spike above the NAAQS during the maintenance period. The interim inventory chosen f or this redesignation request is 2017. The 2017 interim year emissions inventory for the New Jersey portion of the Northern New Jersey

- New York

- Connecticut (NNJ

- NY

- CT) Nonattainment Area is included as Attachment 1. The 2017 interim year emissions inven tory for the New Jersey portion of the Southern New Jersey

- Philadelphia (SNJ.

- Phila.) Nonattainment Area is included as Attachment 2.

The 20 17 interim year emissions inventory was prepared with the support of the Mid

- Atlantic Regional Air Management Asso ciation (MARAMA) and its contractors, AMEC Environment and Infrastructure a nd SRA International, Inc. A copy of the Technical Support Document 1 prepared by AMEC and SRA for MARAM A is included as Attachment 3

. The 2017 interim year emissions inventory includes emissions projections for the following sectors:

• EGU Point Sources

• NonEGU Point Sources

• Stationary Area Sources

• Nonroad Mobile Sources

• Onroad Mobile Sources

T he 2017 interim year emissions estimates for onroad mobile sources are interpolate d value s based on MARAMA MOVES (Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator Model) results for 2007 and 2025

. New Jersey updated the wildfire emissions in the 2017 MARAMA inventory , consistent with the wildfire update to the 2007 inventory discussed in Appendix V

. New Jer sey maintained the existing growth factor and projected no growth from wildfires from 2007 to 2017 , as was done previously, but from a different base 2007 emissions.

1 AMEC and SRA for MARAMA. Technical Support Document for the Development of the 2017/2020 Emission Inventory for Regional Air Quality Modeling in the Northeast/Mid

- Atlantic Region Version 3.3. AMEC Environment and Infrastructure and SRA International, Inc for Mid

- Atlantic Regional Air Management Association (MARAMA), January 23, 2012.VIII

- 2 The 2017 MARAMA New Jersey inventory varies slightly from the 2007 and 2025 New Jersey inventories contained in this SIP revision and discussed in Appendices V and VI for the following reasons:

• The New Jersey 2025 SIP inventory for 2025 w as adjusted to incorporate a conservative rule effectiveness factor for the New Jersey rules (most speci fically low sulfur fuel and boilers) to reduce anticipated emission reductions. This is discussed in more detail in Appendix VI.

• The New Jersey 2007 and 2025 SIP inventories were adjusted to incorporate updated pleasure craft emissions based on the latest state specific information.
PECO ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   SEC METHOD
                                     ($000)




                                                                       12 Months
                                                                         Ended
                                                                       12/31/97
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET INCOME                                                              $336,558

ADD BACK:

- INCOME TAXES:
     OPERATING INCOME                                                    285,343
     NON-OPERATING INCOME                                                  7,426
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     NET TAXES                                                          $292,769
================================================================================

- FIXED CHARGES:
     INTEREST APPLICABLE TO DEBT                                        $359,363
     ANNUAL RENTALS ESTIMATE                                            $  8,723
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                                $368,086
================================================================================
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADJUSTED EARNINGS INCLUDING AFUDC                                       $997,413
================================================================================
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                          2.71
================================================================================
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-88275) of the Penn Traffic Company of our
reports dated (i) March 15, 2002, except with respect to the information in
Note 1 entitled Restatement as to which the date is September 13, 2002, and
(ii) March 10, 2000, except with respect to the information in Note 1
entitled Restatement as to which the date is September 13, 2002, relating to
the financial statements and financial statement schedules, which appears in
this Form 10-K/A.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Syracuse, New York
September 17, 2002
EXHIBIT 31(b)

I, Thomas A. Nardi, certify that:

1)	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of North Shore Gas Company;

2)	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3)	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4)	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5)	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: December 11, 2003

/s/ Thomas A. Nardi
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RUSSELL L. SCHOOLEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 311 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RUSSELL L. SCHOOLEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 312 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RUSSELL L. SCHOOLEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 313 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
# C_2023162EN.01000901.xml

| 5.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 162/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 162/9

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.105803

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 162/07)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 20.3.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.105803 |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Region | Ireland |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Microelectronics Manufacturers Ukraine Enterprise Crisis Scheme |
| Legal basis | Multiple. See attached document. |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grants |
| Budget | Overall budget: 100 000 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 100 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | 40,0  % |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Manufacture of electronic components |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Niamh Guihen |
| Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment, 23 Kildare Street, Dublin 2 |

Date of adoption of the decision

20.3.2023

Aid number

SA.105803

Member State

Ireland

Region

Ireland

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Microelectronics Manufacturers Ukraine Enterprise Crisis Scheme

Legal basis

Multiple. See attached document.

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grants

Budget

Overall budget: 100 000 000 EUR

Annual budget: 100 000 000 EUR

Intensity

40,0  %

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Manufacture of electronic components

Name and address of the granting authority

Niamh Guihen

Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment, 23 Kildare Street, Dublin 2

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
# C_2023114EN.01000101.xml

| 29.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11040 – PGGM / DIF / EQT / SAUR)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 114/01)

On 14 March 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11040. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11040. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### The State, ex rel. Scott, Appellee, *v.*Village of Cuyahoga Heights et al., Appellants.

(No. 28741

Decided January 28, 1942.)

*Mr. Maxwell J. Gruber,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Locker, Green & Woods,*for appellants.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Williams, Matthias, Haet, Zimmeeman and Bettman, JJ., concur.

Turnee., J., dissents.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-10677 Conference Calendar

JEFFERY MCDANIEL, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus K. J. WENDT; KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER, Respondents-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CV-00454-H

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jeffery McDaniel, federal prisoner # 08769-078, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) denied him a one-year sentence reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e), after initially informing him that he was eligible for such a reduction. McDaniel renews his argument that the denial of the one-year credit violated his due process rights and that promissoryNo. 03-10677 -2- estoppel should prevent the BOP from reneging on its statement of eligibility. His claims fail because there is no protected liberty interest in early release under 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e).
See Rublee v. Fleming , 160 F.3d 213, 216 (5th Cir. 1998); Venegas
v. Henman , 126 F.3d 760, 765 (5th Cir. 1997) (“[t]he loss of the mere opportunity to be considered for discretionary early release is too speculative to constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally protected liberty interest”). Accordingly, the district court did not err in denying McDaniel’s petition, and its judgment is AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 28, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00288

- CR

Neil Howard MCGINNIS,

A ppellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court

, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6773

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On August 26, 2020, we abated this appeal and remanded the cause to the trial court to

determine, inter alia, whether Appellant wanted court

- appointed c ounsel. As ordered, the trial

court held a hearing, made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and appointed counsel to

represent Appellant in this appeal. The trial court clerk and reporter each filed supplemental

records.

We REINSTA TE this appeal on this court’s docket. Appellant’s brief is due

November 23, 2020. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of October, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### STONE v. STATE.

No. 20513.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 14, 1939.

A. D. Emerson, of Waxahachie, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is robbery; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for 15 years.

The trial judge failed to approve the statement of facts. The record is before us without bills of exception’. No question 'is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.