alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv4w6



 





EXHIBIT 4.6




Schedule of Fixed Rate InterNotes Issued




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Interest	 	Interest	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Coupon	 	Coupon	 	Issue	 	Maturity	 	Principal	 	Redemption
	CUSIP No.
	 	Rate
	 	Frequency
	 	Date
	 	Date
	 	Amount
	 	Information

	26876EAC9
	 	 	4.550	%	 	Quarterly	 	 	07/01/04	 	 	 	07/15/08	 	 	$	1,801,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EAD7
	 	 	5.100	%	 	Quarterly	 	 	07/01/04	 	 	 	07/15/10	 	 	$	1,255,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EAE5
	 	 	4.600	%	 	Semi-annual	 	 	07/09/04	 	 	 	07/15/08	 	 	$	2,549,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EAF2
	 	 	5.150	%	 	Semi-annual	 	 	07/09/04	 	 	 	07/15/10	 	 	$	422,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EAG0
	 	 	4.300	%	 	Semi-annual	 	 	07/15/04	 	 	 	07/15/08	 	 	$	2,033,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EAH8
	 	 	4.850	%	 	Semi-annual	 	 	07/15/04	 	 	 	07/15/10	 	 	$	430,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EAJ4
	 	 	4.300	%	 	Semi-annual	 	 	07/22/04	 	 	 	07/15/08	 	 	$	5,171,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EAK1
	 	 	5.000	%	 	Semi-annual	 	 	07/22/04	 	 	 	01/15/11	 	 	$	1,837,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EAL9
	 	 	3.700	%	 	Monthly	 	 	07/29/04	 	 	 	07/15/07	 	 	$	510,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EAM7
	 	 	4.150	%	 	Quarterly	 	 	07/29/04	 	 	 	07/15/08	 	 	$	1,562,000	 	 	Non-callable
----

| INDIANA                                        | 35-1544218                        |
|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

|   | o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

|   | Description                                                                   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 99.1   | Press Release, dated September 3, 2010, issued by First Merchants Corporation |
| 99.2   | First Merchants Corporation Power Point Presentation, September 3, 2010       |

----
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Matt Wayrynen, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Elko Ventures Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
16th day of July, 2007.


/s/ Matt Wayrynen
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## October 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



## 136741 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

## Plaintiff-Appellee, J ustices



## v SC: 136741 COA: 277880 Macomb CC: 2 006-001932-FC MICHAEL HENRY HADRIAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 6, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1015 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 22, 2008

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1






     CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Possis  Medical,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the year  ended  July 31,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
G. Dutcher,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





                                               /s/
                                      Robert G. Dutcher
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      October 29, 2003
# CI2022281EN.01000101.xml

| 22.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 281/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 281/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1276, and in Council Regulation (EU) No °269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1274 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2022/C 281 I/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1276 (2) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No °269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1274 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons should be included in the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web sites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No °269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address before 2 November 2022:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, 2nd paragraph, and Article 263, 4th and 6th paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 194, 21.7.2022, p. 11.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(4)  OJ L 194, 21.7.2022, p. 5.

---
Exhibit








AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Amendment No. 8 to Employment Agreement is entered into on September 30, 2017 by Cimpress USA Incorporated (formerly known as Vistaprint USA, Incorporated) (the “Company”) and Robert S. Keane (the “Employee”). The Company and the Employee previously entered into an Employment Agreement dated September 1, 2009, as amended (the “Agreement”), and now wish to amend the Agreement further to reflect the Employee’s compensation for the Company’s 2018 fiscal year.
The parties agree as follows:
1.Compensation and Benefits.
1.1    Salary.  The Company shall pay the Employee, in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll practices, an annualized base salary of $1,298,850 for the one-year period commencing on July 1, 2017. 
1.2    FY 2018 Incentive Compensation.  The Employee is entitled to receive performance share units under the Cimpress N.V. 2016 Performance Equity Plan with a value of $5,250,000.
1.3    Withholding.  All salary, equity, and other compensation payable to the Employee is subject to applicable withholding taxes.
2.    No Other Modification.  Except as specifically modified by this Amendment, the Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
The parties have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above.
CIMPRESS USA INCORPORATED
By:    /s/Sean E. Quinn
		
	Title:
	Chief Financial Officer


EMPLOYEE
/s/Robert S. Keane
Robert S. Keane
[No. 45512-5-I.

Division One.

December 18, 2000.]

#### *In the Matter of the Parentage of*Landon Lydig, Kimberly Hara, *Respondent,*and Russell Lydig, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-5-00691-5, Steven G. Scott, J., entered October 14, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
#### PITTSBURG NAT. BANK v. EHRLICH.

No. 3262.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Jan. 27, 1938.

Engledow & Guest, of Pittsburg, for plaintiff in error.

W. Clyde Hull, of Pittsburg, for defendant in error.

O’QUINN, Justice.

For convenience we shall refer to plaintiff in error as plaintiff, and to defendant in error as defendant; that being their attitude in the trial court.

This suit originated in the justice court, precinct No. 1 of Camp county, Tex. In that court plaintiff sued defendant to recover on a promissory note in the sum of $125.96, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage on certain personal property, given to secure the payment of the note. The pleadings in the justice court weré oral. The case was tried to the court without a jury, and judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff for the amount due on the. note and for foreclosure of the mortgage. The defendant appealed the case to the county court. In the county court both parties filed written pleadings, upon which the case was tried to the court without a jury, and judgment rendered in favor of defendant. We have the case on appeal.

Plaintiff alleged that defendant executed and delivered to it a mortgage in writing to secure the note sued on describing the property mortgaged. It further alleged that only a part of the property covered by the mortgage was in existence at the time the suit was filed, describing the property alleged to be in existence and stating its value. The court sustained an exception against this pleading on the ground that the allegation was but the conclusion of the pleader. Plaintiff assigns this as an error. We sustain the assignment. The allegation was necessary and proper, and was not a conclusion of the pleader. Proof of the value of the property upon which fore*268closure was sought was necessary to show; jurisdiction in the court to adjudicate the matter.

Defendant’s plea of want of consideration for the execution of the note, that it was signed “in jest,” is not supported by any evidence — in fact, defendant testified that such was not true. His defense of “usury” is not supported by any evidence. His denial of owing any debt or amount to plaintiff is supported only by his testimony, and it is so contradictory, confusing and uncertain as not to support the judgment. Plaintiff insists that we should reverse the judgment and render judgment for it. Because of the uncertainty and confused state of the record, we feel that the judgment should be reversed and remanded for another trial. If upon another trial the evidence is substantially as in the instant trial, judgment should then be for plaintiff.

Reversed and remanded.

WALKER, C. J., is recused.
#### KANSAS LIFE INS. CO. v. FIRST BANK OF TRUSCOTT.

No. 1508—6261.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section B.

Jan. 30, 1935.

Charles M. Howell and K. *W.*Halterman, both of Kansas City, Mo., James A. Stephens, of Benjamin, and Joiner & Cook, of Plain-view, for plaintiff in error.

D. J. Brookreson, of Benjamin, for defendant in error.

SMEDLEX, Commissioner.

This is a companion case to Kansas Life Insurance Company v. First Bank of Truscott, 78 S.W.(2d) 584, this day decided.' The suit is upon another policy of insurance of like amount and terms to those involved in that case, but issued on a different date, September 11, 1929. Otherwise the facts in the two cases are the same. The same single question is presented by the applications for writ of error in b.oth cases.

The insured died within one year from the date of the policy involved in this ease. This *588affords no reason for a different decision, since the record shows that? plaintiff in error made' no. contest of its liability until after the expiration of the period named in the incontestable clause. American National Insurance Company v. Welsh (Tex. Com. App.) 22 S.W.(2d) 1063; Mutual Life Insurance Company y. Hurni Packing Company, 263 U. S. 167, 44 S. Ct. 80, 68 L. Ed. 235, 31 A. L. R. 102; Note 31 A. L. R. pages 108, and following.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and that of the district court are affirmed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
# C_2023203EN.01000801.xml

| 9.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/8

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.106377

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 203/07)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 13.4.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.106377 |
| Member State | Netherlands |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Regeling tegemoetkoming energiekosten |
| Legal basis | (a) | The Framework Act for subsidies for the ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy and the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, article 2 and 3, (b) The draft Order of the Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Policy laying down temporary rules on subsidy for energy-intensive SMEs to compensate for increased energy prices |

Date of adoption of the decision

13.4.2023

Aid number

SA.106377

Member State

Netherlands

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Regeling tegemoetkoming energiekosten

Legal basis

(a)

The Framework Act for subsidies for the ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy and the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, article 2 and 3, (b) The draft Order of the Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Policy laying down temporary rules on subsidy for energy-intensive SMEs to compensate for increased energy prices

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 1 400 000 000 EUR

Annual budget: 1 400 000 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

| De Minister voor Klimaat en Energie |
| --- |
| Postbus 20401, 2500 EK Den Haag |

De Minister voor Klimaat en Energie

Postbus 20401, 2500 EK Den Haag

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of Wilhelmina International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Murray, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




August 16, 2012

/s/ John P. MurrayName:
John P. MurrayTitle:
Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)
# 6H

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 24 - 0277 DUTCH ENNIS,

Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MOJAVA COFFEE, INC., and DOES I -V,

Defendants and Appellees. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This a ppeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Arthur V. Wittich,** whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED this May 30, 2024.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court c: Nicholas Rowley, Daniel B. Bidegaray, Scott M. Stearns, Zachary Aaron Franz, Arthur V. Wittich 05/30/2024
Case Number: DA 24-0277
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Precision Castparts
Corp. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Donegan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Date: June 14, 2006                 
|                                    
|/s/ MARK DONEGAN                    
|Mark Donegan                        
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

Inconnection with this quarterly report of ML Systematic Momentum LLC (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with theSecurities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, PaulMorton, Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of Merrill LynchAlternative Investments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Date: August 13, 2008                                                       |            |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
|                                                                             |
| By                                                                               | /s/Paul  Morton |   |
| Paul  Morton                                                                     |            |
| Chief Executive Officer,  President and Manager 

(Principal Executive  Officer) |
|                                                                                  |                 |  |

 

----