alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 3, 2024, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), the Resilient Infrastructure + Secure Energy Consortium (“RISE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Wright Electric, Malta, NY; Athena Intelligence, Sacramento, CA; BCG Federal Corp., Washington, DC; Energy Storage Systems LLC, Leesburg, VA; SanPete Financial Group, Atlanta, GA; Precision Combustion, North Haven, CT; Ambri, Inc., Marlborough, MA; and ADACEN Federal LLC, Albuquerque, NM, have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and RISE intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On July 2, 2021, RISE filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on August 23, 2021 (86 FR 47155).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 1, 2024. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 28, 2024 (89 FR 54042).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2024-22070 Filed 9-25-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# C_2022241EN.01003401.xml

| 24.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/34

---

Corrigendum to Draft Council Conclusions on the Development of Sustainable Public Procurement

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 236 of 20 June 2022
  )

(2022/C 241/17)

The title should read:

‘Council Conclusions on the Development of Sustainable Public Procurement’.

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

May 3, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00516

- CV

Lon E. GRINAGE & Marilyn Grinage,

Appellants

v.

Jason Phillip THOMPSON & Terrie Mylene Thompson,

Appellee s

From the 218th Judicial District Court

, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. CVW1900810 Honorable Lynn Ellison , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s amended brief was due on April 29, 2022

. Before the due date, Appellant
filed a motion for an extension of time to file the brief

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6( d ).

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. The brief is due on May 3 1 , 202 2

. See id

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of May, 2022

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5137]

[[Page 12576]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, March 7, 2012, 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matters To Be Considered: Decisional Matter: Fiscal Year 2012 Operating 
Plan.
    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at www.cpsc.gov/webcast.

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, March 7, 2012; 11 a.m.--12 p.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered: Compliance Status Report: The Commission staff 
will brief the Commission on the status of compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: February 28, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5137 Filed 2-28-12; 2:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6460

LEONARD LORENZO BULLOCK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SERGEANT WILLIAMS, Building Support Supervisor; M. VANDERMARK, 

Operations Officer; ANITA CRITTON, Grievance Coordinator; BETH CABEL, 

Warden; LIEUTENANT GOODRICH, Building Supervisor; OFFICER 

CHENAULT, Floor Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:20-cv-00832-JAG-EWH)

Submitted: June 24, 2021 Decided: June 29, 2021

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leonard Lorenzo Bullock, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Leonard Lorenzo Bullock appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with the magistrate judge’s order 

directing him to pay the initial partial filing fee or submit a sworn statement that he is 

unable to pay the fee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bullock v. Williams, 

No. 3:20-cv-00832-JAG-EWH (E.D. Va. Mar. 9, 2021). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### (

Subject: Confidential Business Information
Dear Sir 

### j 

# Ph Its own behalf, wishes to hold confidential information pertaining to as invested both time and capital in preparing for the commercialization ofthis innovativelaser marking system. Ourtotal investment to date for this productwill exceed

..

## & j 

### § byyear end and asignificant amount oftraining and sales initiativeswill be focused on this product for the nextthree years. Potential markets for this technology are forecasted at over II.

# !A

# adollars during the first three years. We would like to extend confidentiality for the next5years ending in 2018 Confidential information is protected In ourorganization through both procedural and physical barriers. Computer records are protected through password protocols that are reviewed every 90 days. Access to file locations Is restricted by key cards and requires multiple permissions to access. Any future disclosure of components is governed through legally binding non-disclosure agreements with limited distribution. We will not disclose CBI information through marketing and advertising/ promotional material, Material safety data sheets or other similar materials, professional ortrade publications; orany other media or publications available to the public or to our competitors. The public disclosure ofthe CBI information would adversely affect our business performance In sales, capital expenditures and loss in sales would ultimately result in a loss of jobs and company profitability the forecasted growth by2016. Capital expenditures for new milling result in a I a loss In production capability. Marketing costs are progress and public disclosure would result in a loss o • 

## I. • in marketing collateral and travel expenses overthe first year. Disclosure ofthe Identity and use ofthis additive would be agreat aid to our competitors in reverse engineering our product. This new chemical is used for an laser marking application which is a highly competitive marketwith asmall number of significant participants. All ofthe companies in our industry peruse the literature for new chemical substances identified In the scientific literature articles, tradejournal articles and press releases and patents. Disclosing the Identity ofthis chemical substance on the chemical inventorywould allow acompetitorto discard dead-ends in their research and focus on only those chemical substances on the chemical inventory. Publication ofthe Identityofthis chemical substance would make available at no cost to our competitors the financial Investmentfe made in developing this new chemical substance. Further itwould erode our position in the market gamed through the superior performance of our products and reduce ourability to enjoy a profitfor the portion ofthe marketthatwe would manage to maintain. The material has been patented in the US but has had limited commercial trials, the product Is used as

**I~h~lir•n** on all types offlexible and rigid packaging.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61


64



68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
 

______________________________________________________________ 

Page is not included in this copy. 

Pages 115 through 118 are not included in this copy. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information: 

__ __ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

__ __ Identity of product impurities. 

__ __ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

__ __ Description of quality control procedures. 

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

__ __ FIFRA registration data. 

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

_____ Internal deliberative information. 

_____ Attorney-Client work product. 

__ __ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency. 

 

The information not included is generally considered confidential 

by product registrants. If you have any questions, please 

contact the individual who prepared the response to your request. 

_________________________________________________________________
Exhibit 99

               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                
                     Washington, D. C. 20549




                            FORM 11-K



[X]  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
   EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998

                               OR

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
   EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                 Commission file number 2-82760
                                
                                
                                
A. Full title of the plan and address of the plan, if different
from that of the issuer
   named below:

                   Peoples Energy Corporation
                  Employee Stock Purchase Plan



B. Name of issuer of the securities held pursuant to the plan and
the address of its
   principal executive office:

                   Peoples Energy Corporation
                     130 East Randolph Drive
                     Chicago, Illinois 60601


This Form 11-K is being filed for informational purposes only.




ITEM 1.   An audited statement of financial condition as of the
end of the latest two
       fiscal years of the plan.

       Not applicable.  Employees' payments for Company stock are
neither segregated nor held for investment.

ITEM 2.   An audited statement of income and changes in plan
equity for each of the
       latest three fiscal years of the plan.

       Not applicable.  See above.


                            SIGNATURE


       Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, Peoples Energy Corporation has duly caused this
annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
hereunto duly authorized.


                                      Peoples Energy Corporation
                                      Employee Stock Purchase Plan
                                           (Name of Plan)




Date: December 17, 1998               By /s/ James M.Luebbers
                                              (Signature)
                                         James M. Luebbers
                                       Vice President and Controller

                                       Peoples Energy Corporation
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard Beyer, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I, Ltd., certify, for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 1, 2010 (the Quarterly Report), which this statement accompanies fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Freescale Semiconductor
Holdings I, Ltd.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 1350.

Dated: October 22, 2010



/s/ RICHARD BEYERRichard BeyerChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I, Ltd.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determine d that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-21036 Summary Calendar

HAROLD OGDEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ARROW AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

(H-94-CV-3987)

August 14, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. *

PER CURIAM:

Harold Ogden ap peals from the district court’s grant of

summary judgment for Arrow Automotive Industries Incorporated.

Ogden argues that there were genuine issues of mater ial fact

precluding summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and the

briefs and affirm the district court’s judgment for essentially the1 Ogden’s brief fals ely states that the record shows Arrow

represented t o TEC that Ogden was let go due to a reduction in

force. However, the most the record suggests is that TEC made a determination (which was subject to appeal; whether or not it was appealed is not reflected) that Ogden was let go in a reduction in

force; there is no evidence whether Arrow took a position before

TEC, much less what that position was. Counsel is cautioned not to

misstate the record.

2 same reasons set forth by the district court. 1

Ogden also appeals from the district court’s deni al of his

postjudgmen t motion to set aside the summary judgment or

alternatively for a new trial; the motion was served and filed well

past the Rule 59 deadline. Ogden failed to file a separate notice

of appeal from the district court’s denial of this motion.

Accordingly, we are without jurisdiction to consider this issue.

Williams v. Chater

, F.3d

, (5th Cir. June 26, 1996, No.

94-20924) 1996 WL 361223 at *2.

AFFIRMED
# Official Journal L 57/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 57 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6128 February 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 57

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6128 February 2018

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | | Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2018/251 of the European Union’s general budget for the financial year 2018 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

BUDGETS

Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2018/251 of the European Union’s general budget for the financial year 2018

1

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

Any revenue provided for in Article 21(2) and (3) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.

Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

Budgetary remarks are only executable insofar as they do not modify or extend the scope of an existing legal base, impinge on the administrative autonomy of institutions and can be covered by available resources (as indicated in the annex to the executability letter dated 28 October 2015).

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3007 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3007

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the display of the 
            Confederate battle flag in national cemeteries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2015

  Mr. Gallego (for himself, Ms. Lee, Ms. Norton, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. 
   Cummings, Mr. Walz, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. Cartwright, Mr. Serrano, Ms. 
  Schakowsky, and Mr. Clay) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the display of the 
            Confederate battle flag in national cemeteries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON DISPLAY OF CONFEDERATE BATTLE FLAG IN 
              NATIONAL CEMETERIES.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) The Confederate battle flag is a potent reminder of a 
        deeply divisive period of our Nation's history, recalling the 
        human suffering of slavery and Jim Crow.
            (2) For millions of Americans, including veterans and their 
        families, the Confederate battle flag is a symbol of 
        intolerance, injustice, and inequality.
            (3) Flying the Confederate battle flag, originally the 
        banner of forces fighting the armies of the United States, is 
        offensive and inappropriate at cemeteries and other sites 
        dedicated to the memory of America's courageous war dead.
    (b) Prohibition.--Chapter 24 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 2415. Prohibition on display of Confederate battle flag
    ``The Secretary shall prohibit the display of the Confederate 
battle flag in any national cemetery under the control of the National 
Cemetery Administration.''.
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``2415. Prohibition on display of Confederate battle flag.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23


                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We  hereby  consent  to  the   incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration  Statement on Form S-3 (No.  33-44380) and
in the Registration  Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-26442,  33-6141,  33-26443,
33-29144,  33-19012,  2-67317, 33-34363,  33-34362 and 33-62486) of Phelps Dodge
Corporation  of our report dated  January 22, 1996  appearing on page 54 of this
Form 10-K.  We also consent to the  incorporation  by reference of our report on
the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears on page 52 of this Form 10-K.


PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 20, 1996