1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Regulatory Docket No. ______________ 

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF: 

DROFIKA TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED L.L.C

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 

61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & 

(a)(2), 

AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF 

DJI Phantom 3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF 

THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 

(PUBLIC LAW 112-95)

Submitted on July 28, 2015

By: Wale Oriola and Kevin Mobolade

Drofika Technologies Limited LLC

2381 Scotney Castle Lane,

Powder Springs, GA 30127

404-574-0271

www.drofika.co

woriola@gmail.com
2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page 

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS 3

SUMMARY 4

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER 4

BACKGROUND 4 

BASIS FOR PETITION 5

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER 6 

THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH 

DROFIKA TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED LLC SEEKS EXEMPTION 6

THE EXTENT OF RELIEF DROFIKA TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED LLC SEEKS 

AND THE REASON DROFIKA TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED LLC SEEKS THE RELIEF 9

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING DROFIKA TECHNOGIES LIMITED

L.L.C’S REQUEST WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST 11

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION WOULD NOT 

ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY 12

SUMMARY THAT CAN BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER 22

ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, VIEWS, OR ARGUMENTS 

AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT DROFIKA TECHNOLOGIES 

LIMITED L.L.C’S REQUEST 22

CONCLUSION 22

APPENDICES 23
3

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level 

AOI Area of Interest 

ATC Air Traffic Control 

ATO Air Traffic Organization 

AV Aerial Vehicle 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

COA Certificate of Authorization 

FAA Federal Aviation Administration 

FAR Federal Aviation Regulation 

GCS Ground Control Station 

GPS Global Positioning System 

LOL Loss of Link 

NAS National Airspace System 

NOTAM Notice to Airman 

PIC Pilot In Command 

Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) 

SO Safety Observer 

SOP Standard Operating Procedures 

UA Unmanned Aircraft 

UAS Unmanned Aircraft System 

VFR Visual Flight Rules 

VLOS Visual Line of Site 

VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions 

VTOL Vertical Takeoff and Landing
4

SUMMARY

Drofika Technologies Limited L.L.C seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R 

§§ 61.113(a) &(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), 

and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (DJI Phantom 3) pursuant to 

Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This exemption will 

permit Drofika Technologies Limited L.L.C to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for 

the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of construction sites, oil 

and gas sites, real estate, special events, and landscape over certain areas of the United 

States.

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER

Drofika Technologies Limited L.L.C (hereinafter referred to as “Drofika”) is a limited 

liability company located in Atlanta Georgia. The primary purpose of the LLC is to provide 

clients in real estate, oil and gas, construction and photography industry with expertise and 

knowledge in advanced technologies and solutions to increase efficiency, productivity and 

effectiveness. Drofika is owned and operated by a staff that is highly trained with experience in 

data science, information technology, and aircraft operations. Drofika also operates an ecommerce website (www.drofika.myshopify.com) and an interactive blog (www.drofika.co) 

dedicated to providing useful information to the public to foster the commercial utility of the UAS 

technology. The objective of The Drofika and our Unmanned Aircraft System (DJI Phantom 3) 

aerial operations is to provide a more affordable, high-quality production system for a variety of 

governmental, commercial, public, and residential uses, specifically targeting:

 Construction sites before and after 

 Oil and Gas Asset Inspections

 Appraisals 

 Real-estate marketing 

 Economic development 

 Civic landmarks 

 Special event coverage 

BACKGROUND

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: DJI Phantom 3, UAS

Drofika seeks an exemption to operate DJI Phantom 3 system for compensation or hire within 

the NAS. The DJI Phantom 3 is vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) 

with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or smart phone systems. The DJI 

Phantom 3 has a maximum gross weight of approximately 2.8 lb. while having a diagonal 

dimension of 23.2”, a maximum speed of approximately 16.4’fps and a maximum flying height of 

400'. The DJI Phantom 3 is equipped with four main rotors; driven by Lithium Polymer battery 

powered electric motors.

The DJI Phantom 3 that will be operated by Drofika will be registered in accordance with 49 

U.S.C. 44103, Registration of Aircraft, as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, Aircraft Registration, and 

marked in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Identification and Registration Marking. 
5

BASIS FOR PETITION

Petitioner, Drofika, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 

11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), Section 333, Special Rules 

for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems, hereby petitions the Administrator to commercially 

operate the DJI Phantom 3, UAS in the National Airspace System (NAS), and for an exemption 

from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). 

In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the 

unmanned aircraft and its operation, Drofika operation of DJI Phantom 3 UAS meets the 

conditions of FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness certificate in 

accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. 

Accordingly, Drofika requests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), 

and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for maintenance that only apply to 

aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. 

Drofika submits that the requested relief is proper since an equivalent level of safety will be 

ensured. Drofika will use experienced personnel or technicians to perform maintenance, 

alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and 

practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual). 

Furthermore, Drofika will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 3 

UAS. 

Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot privileges 

and limitations: Pilot in command, is requested by Drofika to the extent necessary to allow a 

Pilot in Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as well as an airman 

medical certificate, and who has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight hour and currency 

requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom UAS in a manner 

consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining 

appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

Drofika seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, because the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS do not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 

21, Subpart H. As such, Drofika submits that they will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is in 

an airworthy condition, prior to every flight, by determining that the UAS are in compliance with 

the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction 

Manual), and that the aircraft are in a condition for safe flight.

Drofika also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter 

Settings, as the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will not have a typical barometric altimeter onboard. 

However, altitude information of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be provided to the PIC via Global 

Positioning System (GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry data link, which 

downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path. This altitude 

information, combined with Drofika’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS within visual line of 

sight, at or below 400 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. 

Additionally, Drofika seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b), entitled 

Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions. Drofika submits that safety will not be affected by 

operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions 
6

(VMC) under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 

approximately 23 minutes. Battery power indicators are also able to show exactly how much 

battery power is left, as well as how much time is needed to return safely back to point of take 

off.

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, Drofika provides the following information in support of its 

petition for exemption:

A. Name and Address of The Petitioners

The name and address of the Petitioners and point of contact is:

Name: Drofika Technologies Limited L.L.C

Owners: Kevin Mobolade & Wale Oriola

Address: 2381 Scotney Castle Lane

Powder Springs, GA 30127

Phone: 917-254-8915

Email: woriola@gmail.com

B. The Specific Sections of 14 C.F.R. From Which Drofika Seeks Exemption. 

1. Drofika Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b).

Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, 

subsections (a) and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part: 

(a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PIC) of 

an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may that 

person, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft. 

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection 

with any business or employment if—

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and 

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. 

2. Drofika Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7 (a). 

Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, subsection (a), states the following: 

(a) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition.

3. Drofika Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121. 

Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, subsection (a), states the following, in part: 

(a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight 

level of that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, 

when operating—
7

(1) Below 18,000 feet MSL, to—

(i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and 

within 100 nautical miles of the aircraft; 

(ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of 

this section, the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate 

available station; or 

(iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of 

the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before 

departure.

4. Drofika Seeks Exemption From The Requirements of Section 91.151(b). 

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, subsection 

(b), states the following: 

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering 

wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of 

intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 

minutes.

5. Drofika Seeks Exemption From The Requirements of Section 91.405(a). 

Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required, subsection (a), states the following: Each 

owner or operator of an aircraft—

(a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and 

shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this 

section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.]

6. Drofika Seeks Exemption From The Requirements of Section 91.407(a)(1). 

Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, 

rebuilding, or alteration, subsection (a)(1), states the following: 

(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, 

preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless—

(1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized 

under § 43.7 of this chapter[.]

7. Drofika Seeks Exemption From the Requirements of Sections 91.409(a)(1) And 

91.409(a)(2). 

Section 91.409, entitled Inspections, subsection (a), states the following: 

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an 

aircraft unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had –
8

(1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and 

has been approved for return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 

of this chapter; or 

(2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in 

accordance with part 21 of this chapter.

8. Drofika Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.417(a) And 91.417(b). 

Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records, subsections (a) and (b), state the 

following: 

(a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each 

registered owner or operator shall keep the following records for the periods 

specified in paragraph (b) of this section: 

(1) Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration 

and records of the 100-hour, annual, progressive, and other required or 

approved inspections, as appropriate, for each aircraft (including the 

airframe) and each engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an aircraft. 

The records must include—

(i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the 

Administrator) of the work performed; and 

(ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and 

(iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving 

the aircraft for return to service. 

(2) Records containing the following information: 

(i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each 

propeller, and each rotor. 

(ii) The current status of life-limited parts of each airframe, engine, 

propeller, rotor, and appliance. 

(iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the 

aircraft which are required to be overhauled on a specified time 

basis. 

(iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time 

since the last inspection required by the inspection program under 

which the aircraft and its appliances are maintained. 

(v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) 

and safety directives including, for each, the method of 

compliance, the AD or safety directive number and revision date. 

If the AD or safety directive involves recurring action, the time and 

date when the next action is required. 
9

(vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for 

each major alteration to the airframe and currently installed 

engines, rotors, propellers, and appliances.

(b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods prescribed: 

(1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained until 

the work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the work is 

performed. 

(2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and 

transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold. 

(3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of 

this chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is 

approved for return to service.

C. The Extent Of Relief Drofika Seeks And The Reason Drofika Seeks the Relief.

1. Extent of Relief Drofika Seeks and The Reason Drofika Seeks Relief From Section 

61.113(a) And (b). 

Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in 

command, is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a private pilot or higher 

level certificate, as well as a current and valid airman medical certificate, and who has met 

certain flight-hour and currency requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations for 

compensation or hire. 

This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a 

private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any 

business or employment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and 

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. 

As set forth more fully below, Drofika submits that an equivalent level of safety will be 

maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC 

has met certain flight-hour and currency requirements, demonstrating that the PIC is able to 

safely operate either the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with the operations 

specifications as described in this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers, as 

well as maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

Further, Drofika submits that all flights of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, conducted by the PIC 

pursuant to the grant of this Petition: (1) will be incidental to Drofika’s business; and (2) will not 

carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. 

2. Extent of Relief Drofika Seeks And The Reason Drofika Seeks Relief From Section 

91.7(a). 

Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, is requested to the extent 

required to allow Drofika to determine that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are in airworthy condition 

prior to every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in compliance with the operating documents 

(i.e., the Drofika Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 
10

Instruction Manual). Drofika seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not 

require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, 

Drofika will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are in airworthy condition based upon its 

compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3

Instruction Manual) prior to every flight, and further, determine that the aircraft are in condition 

for safe flight, as stated in the conditions and limitations below.

3. Extent of Relief Drofika Seeks And The Reason Drofika Seeks Relief From Section 

91.121.

Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, may be required to allow flight operations 

of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, which utilize a barometric pressure sensor, GPS equipment, and a 

radio communications telemetry data link to downlink altitude information from the UA to the PIC 

at the ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that any altitude information 

concerning UAS operations be reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet above ground level 

(AGL), Drofika seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 3 UA’s altimeter may be set 

on the ground to zero feet AGL, rather than the local barometric pressure or field altitude, before 

each flight. 

Considering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is sought 

to the extent necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and limitations stated below. As 

more fully set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will be maintained since the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS are equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and GPS equipment, which 

automatically ensures that a ground level pressure setting will be established prior to each flight, 

and provides the PIC with altitude information of the UA on the heads-up display of the GCS.

4. Extent Of relief Drofika Seeks And The Reason Drofika Seeks Relief From Section 

91.151(b). 

Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, is 

requested to the extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS 

during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), 

for a total duration of 23 minutes. Drofika seeks the requested relief because without an 

exemption from Section 91.151(b), the flight time duration of the battery powered DJI Phantom 

3 UAS will severely constrain the practicality of any aerial video or still photo flight operations 

that Drofika proposes to conduct pursuant to this Petition. 

Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, the DJI 

Phantom 3 operating documents, and Drofika’s proposed operating limitations, ensure that 

Drofika will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in 

visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery 

power to fly for a total duration of 23 minutes.

5. Extent Of Relief Drofika Seeks And The Reason Drofika Seeks Relief From Sections 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) & (a) (2), And 91.417(a) & (b). 

Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only apply to 

aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, Drofika requests relief from these Sections because the 

DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not require airworthiness certificates. As set forth more fully below, the 

DJI Phantom 3 UAS meet the conditions of FMRA Section 333 for operation without an 

airworthiness certificate. Accordingly, Drofika will use trained technicians to perform 
11

maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, 

techniques, and practices prescribed in the UAS operating documents (i.e., the Drofika

Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual). 

Furthermore, Drofika will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 3 

UAS.

D. The Reasons Why Granting Drofika Request Would Be In The Public Interest: That Is, 

How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole. 

Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing Drofika to safely, 

efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography of construction sites, real 

estate, events and civic landscape over certain areas of the United States. 

Additionally, use of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will decrease congestion of the NAS, reduce 

pollution, and provide significant benefits to the economy. Notably, the benefits of Drofika

proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be realized without implicating any privacy 

issues.

1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS. 

The DJI Phantom 3 UAS are battery powered and serve as a safe, efficient, and economical 

alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery. By reducing the 

amount of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemption allowing the use 

of a DJI Phantom 3 UAS would reduce the amount of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise 

and air pollution, as well as increase the safety of life and property in the air and on the ground. 

Furthermore, by reducing the number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS, congestion 

around airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The DJI Phantom 3 

UAS do not require an airport to takeoff or land. Likewise, a reduction of manned aircraft 

conducting aerial video and photography missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be 

handled by air traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases of 

flight operations.

2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI Phantom 3 

UAS. 

Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, instead of manned aircraft, will 

greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated 

during traditional aerial video and still photography flight operations. By using battery power and 

electric motors, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS produce no air pollution, and is the most viable 

environmentally conscious alternative to the cabin class, six cylinder internal combustion engine 

aircraft that are typically utilized for aerial video and photography, while burning approximately 

20-30 gallons per hour of leaded aviation fuel. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS, while reducing the 

carbon footprint of aerial acquisitions, also eliminates noise pollution, as the UAS are propelled 

by battery powered electric motors, rather than an internal combustion engine.

By using the DJI Phantom 3 UAS to perform aerial acquisitions, the substantial risk to life and 

property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with traditional manned 

aircraft flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely eliminated. Aside from the 

lack of flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS (weighing 

approximately 2.8 pounds at their maximum gross weight with diagonal dimension of 23.2 
12

inches, and with no fuel on board), has less physical potential for collateral damage to life and 

property on the ground, and in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct 

similar operations (weighing approximately 6,000 pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42 

feet, a length of 34 feet, and a fuel capacity of 180 gallons).

3. Performing Aerial Video And Photography Operations With The DJI Phantom 3 

UAS Will Benefit The Economy. 

In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are also an economical 

alternative to using manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As such, operation of 

the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will allow United States based companies, like Drofika, to remain 

competitive and contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost of 

aviation fuel and the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulatory actions phasing out 

leaded aviation fuels, U.S. owned and operated companies must adopt new and alternative 

technology in order to remain competitive. Operating the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS 

is one such technology that not only allow companies greater operational flexibility compared to 

manned aircraft, but provides such flexibility without the high operational cost of a traditional 

manned aircraft. 

By operating the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, companies such as Drofika, can remain competitive and 

profitable, and therefore, provide greater job stability to employees and contractors, which will 

ultimately contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Improved financial performance of U.S. 

companies, through commercial use of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, provides a stable workforce 

that increases consumer spending; improves local, state, and federal tax revenues; and allows 

companies to invest in research and development in order to remain competitive both in the 

United States and abroad.

4. There Are No Privacy Issues. 

Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted for decades, 

Drofika’s proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will not implicate any privacy issues. 

Specifically, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be operated only in compliance with operating 

documents (i.e., the Drofika Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI 

Phantom 3 Instruction Manual) which requires property owner involvement as well as local law 

enforcement notification, and in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations, including the 

minimum altitude requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119.

E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or 

How The Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided 

By The Rule From Which Drofika Seeks Exemption. 

1. Reasons Why The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Meet The Conditions Of The FAA 

Modernization And Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333. 

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the 

unmanned aircraft and its operation, Drofika’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS meet the 

conditions of FMRA Section 333, and will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance 

with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. 

Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without airworthiness certification and sets 

forth requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or 
13

the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states 

the following, in part:

(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not 

later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 

Transportation shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate 

safely in the national airspace system before completion of the plan and 

rulemaking required by section 332 of this Act or the guidance required by 

section 334 of this Act.

(b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.--In making the determination 

under subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum—

(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their 

size, weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and 

populated areas, and operation within visual line of sight do not create a 

hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public or pose a 

threat to national security; and 

(2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or 

airworthiness certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States 

Code, is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems 

identified under paragraph (1). 

(c) Requirements for Safe Operation.--If the Secretary determines under this 

section that certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national 

airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe 

operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.

In seeking this exemption, Drofika submits that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS can operate safely in 

the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by: (a) the characteristics of the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific operating limitations.

a. The Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Demonstrate Its Safe Characteristics. 

The DJI Phantom 3 UAS does not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or 

otherwise pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and operational 

capability.

i. Technical Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS. 

The technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are set forth by the DJI Phantom 3 User 

Manual, attached hereto as Appendix A. 

ii. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Global Positioning Modes Enable The UAS To Remain 

Within A Defined Operational Area. 

The DJI Phantom 3 UAS may be operated in both manual and global positioning flight modes. A 

complete description of the flight and navigational modes of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is provided 

at pages 11 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual attached hereto as Appendix A. 
14

iii. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Are Designed For Automatic Return To Home Point Or 

Hover In The Event Of Loss Of The Control Link Or Navigation. 

When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will remain stationary, in flight, for 3 

seconds or more. If, after 3 seconds, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS does not reacquire control link 

data from the GCS, the UAS will assume that the Control Link is lost and the will return to the 

home position (i.e., failsafe mode) via GPS, and will descend to the takeoff position and 

shutdown.

A complete description of the Failsafe Functions of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are set forth at 

pages 12 through 14 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual, attached hereto as Appendix A.

iv. The DJI Phantom 3 GCS And Its Operation. 

A complete description of the operation and specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 GCS and flight 

control software is provided at pages 23 through 29 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual. DJI 

Phantom 3 User Manual is attached hereto as Appendix A.

b. Flight Operations Of DJI Phantom 3 UAS Is Limited To The Line Of Sight Of A Certified 

Pilot in Command With A Safety Observer. 

Drofika operators operating under this exemption will be the only persons to act as a pilot in 

command (PIC) of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS. Additionally, a safety observer will assist him at all 

times during flight time.

c. Flights Of DJI Phantom 3 UAS Will Be Conducted Pursuant To Specific Operating 

Limitations. 

In seeking this exemption, Drofika proposes to commercially operate DJI Phantom 3 UAS for 

the special purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of United 

States, pursuant to the following specific operating limitations. 

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the following aircraft 

described in the operating documents, rotorcraft UAS weighing less than 55 pounds 

maximum gross weight: DJI Phantom 3 Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Proposed 

operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this 

grant. 

2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations for the 

purpose of aerial video and photography. 

3. The UAS may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots. 

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level 

(AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents unless a 

special request is made and approved by ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be in 

feet AGL. 

5. The UAS must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. 

This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than 

corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate. 
15

6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is not permitted.

7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to satisfy the 

VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The SO and 

PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times. Electronic messaging or texting is 

not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and 

cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure 

that the SO can perform the functions prescribed in the operating documents. 

8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing and 

avoiding other air traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstructions and is not 

permitted to operate the camera or other instruments. 

9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible during UAS 

operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists 

between the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption and the 

procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations contained 

in the grant of exemption take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the 

operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The 

operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility 

to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator 

upon request. The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it 

petitions for extension or amendment to the grant of exemption. If the operator 

determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA 

granted the exemption, then the operator must petition for amendment to its grant of 

exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) may be contacted if questions 

arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents. 

10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for 

safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the 

UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been 

performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Control 

Station must be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations must 

be properly documented in the aircraft records. 

11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS 

operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must 

undergo a functional test flight. The PIC who conducts the functional test flight must 

make an entry in the aircraft records. 

12. The pre-flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable 

components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant sections of the 

operating documents. 

13. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component, maintenance, 

overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements.

14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping 

requirements, in accordance with the operating documents. Maintenance, inspection, 

alterations, and status of replacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in the 
16

aircraft records, including total time in service, description of work accomplished, and the 

signature of the authorized person returning the UAS to service. 

15. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer Safety 

Bulletins. 

16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the corrective 

action taken against discrepancies discovered between inspections. 

17. The PIC must possess at least a private pilot certificate and at least a current thirdclass medical certificate. 

18. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the operator’s 

qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner 

consistent with how the UAS will be operated under the exemption, including evasive 

and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, 

vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours must be logged in a 

manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the 

operator’s PICs are permitted under the terms of the exemption. However, training 

operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During training, 

proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations 

are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate 

distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 91.119. 

19. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1. All 

operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). If flight at 

night is required, a special request will be made at the FAA office closest to proposed 

area of operations. Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized. 

20. The UAS may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point as 

denoted on a current FAA-published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with 

that airport’s management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance 

with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s COA. The letter of agreement with the 

airport management must be made available to the Administrator upon request. 

21. The UAS may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC. 

22. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a 

predetermined location within the planned operating area and land or be recovered in 

accordance with the operating documents.

23. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies in 

accordance with the operating documents. 

24. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast 

weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to the 

intended landing point and land the UA with 25% battery power remaining. 

25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of 

Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant of 

exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman 
17

(NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to the 

operation. All operations shall be conducted in accordance with airspace requirements in 

the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude level and potential transponder 

requirements. 

26. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by serial 

number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have identification 

(NNumber) markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must 

be as large as practicable.

27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and 

control of the UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or 

other appropriate government oversight agency requirements. 

28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to 

the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the UAS is operating. These 

documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official 

upon request. 

29. The UAS must remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned aviation 

operations and activities at all times. 

30. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 

31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating 

persons (persons other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons), 

vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating 

persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must 

ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation 

arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 

feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately and/or; 

b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the 

owner/controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission 

and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to

those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard, and;

c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons do 

not present an undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a).

32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from 

land owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be 

conducted. 

33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported 

to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be 
18

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained 

on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.

2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b) 

Would Not Adversely Affect Safety. 

Drofika submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 61.113(a) and (b) will 

be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that 

PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC 

is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, 

including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from 

people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

Considering Drofika’s proposed area of operations, and the operating limitations set forthabove; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements to those of 

commercial pilot requirements (See Exemption No. 11062); and the airmanship skills necessary 

to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, Drofika submits that the additional manned 

airmanship experience of a commercially certificated pilot would not correlate to the airmanship 

skills necessary for Drofika’s specific proposed flight operations. 

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 

11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 

11150, 11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). 

Drofika will not allow any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has 

demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour requirements or the DJI Phantom 3 UAS training 

and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a 

manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. 

§ 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 hours of those

hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations 

under the exemption). In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs 

and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). 

As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight experience that was 

obtained in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safety 

during Drofika’s proposed operations. The Administrator has held that prior documented flight 

experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would ensure safe 

operations, stating as follows: 

In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the 

purpose of motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have accumulated 

and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a 

UAS rotorcraft pilot including at least 10 hours logged as a UAS pilot with a multi-rotor 

UAS. Prior to operations under Exemption No. 11062, the PIC must also have 

accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make 

and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption. For clarification, the 

FAA considers these minimum hour requirements to be inclusive rather than additive; 
19

i.e. 5 hours make and model time may be included in the 10 hours of multi-rotor time and 

the 10 hours may be included in the total 25 hours of UAS rotorcraft time. In addition to 

the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the 

preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the flighthour requirements in Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build 

proficiency in the skills necessary to safely conduct the petitioner’s proposed operations. 

The FAA also finds that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in 

compliance with applicable regulations would satisfy this requirement. Training, 

proficiency, and experience-building flights can also be conducted under the grant of 

exemption to accomplish the required flight time. During training, proficiency, and 

experience-building flights the PIC is required to operate the UA with appropriate 

distances in accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119. 

Accordingly, Drofika will ensure safe operations by not allowing any PIC to operate the 

DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour 

and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 

UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency 

maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and 

structures.

3. Reasons Why An Exemption From The requirements Of Section 91.7(a) Would Not 

Adversely Affect Safety. 

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because prior to 

every flight, Drofika will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is in an airworthy condition based 

upon the UAS’s compliance with its operating documents and as stated in the conditions and 

limitations herein. 

Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific to UAS, in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 

11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 

11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

4. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121 Would Not 

Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintained because the 

altitude information of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be provided to the PIC via GPS equipment 

and a radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for 

active monitoring of the flight path and altitude. This altitude information, combined with 

Drofika’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS within visual line of sight, at or below 500 feet 

AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. The altitude information will be 

generated by GPS equipment installed onboard the aircraft. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude 

initiation point is automatically established by the UAS at ground level. 

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.121 specific to UAS, in circumstances 

similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 

11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 

11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).
20

5. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b) Would Not 

Adversely Affect Safety. 

A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. 

Section 91.151(b) as a result of (1) the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS; (2) 

the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location of the proposed flight 

operations. Accordingly, Drofika will ensure that it will safely operate the battery powered DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in VFR conditions, with enough battery power to fly for a 

total duration of 23 minutes. 

Here, as in Exemption No. 11109, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS; the 

limitations on the proposed flight operations; and the location of the proposed operations, will 

ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b). Furthermore, 

safety will be ensured as the DJI Phantom 3 UAS provide audible and visual warnings to the 

PIC at the GCS when the UAS experiences low battery voltage, the first warning occurring at 

approximately 33% remaining battery power, and again at approximately 10% remaining battery

power. At the critically low battery level, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will descend and land 

automatically. 

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91.151 establish that 

safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of 

the UAS are considered. Relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the 

minimums prescribed in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650. 

Moreover, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.151 specific to UAS, in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 

8811, 10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 

11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

6. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety. 

In seeking this exemption, Drofika submits that the equivalent level of safety with regard to the 

regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by Sections 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met because Drofika will use 

trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS 

using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., the 

Drofika’s Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction 

Manual). Furthermore, Drofika will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS. 

Since the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be inspected as prescribed by the operating documents, 

Drofika will maintain the equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.405(a), 

91.409(a)(1), and 91.409(a)(2). A copy of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manuals are attached hereto 

as Appendix A; a copy of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS Maintenance LOG is attached hereto as 

Appendix B. 

Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safety because Drofika will use trained 

technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance on the UAS using 

the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed by the operating documents. 
21

Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety established by 

Sections 91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS 

will be performed by trained technicians. Maintenance will be documented and maintained 

utilizing the monthly maintenance log. 

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not adversely 

affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered.

In consideration of Drofika’s proposed operating limitations, the operating documents, and the 

technical aspects of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, Drofika submits that safety will not be adversely 

affected by granting exemption from 14 C.F.R. Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) and (a)(2), 

91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b). The FAA has previously granted relief specific to UAS in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 

11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 

11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operations.

In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) and 

14 C.F.R. § 21.16 entitled Special Conditions, Drofika requests that the FAA prescribe special 

conditions for the intended operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, which contain such safety 

standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that 

established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7 (a), 91.121, 

91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). Such special 

conditions will permit safe operation of the UAS for the limited purpose of conducting aerial 

video and photography over certain areas of the United States for compensation or hire. FMRA 

Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to 

users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further,

provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification in accordance 

with any requirements that must be established for the safe operation of the UAS in the NAS. 

Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, for 

operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, since the airworthiness regulations of 14 C.F.R. Part 21 

do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the novel or unusual design 

features of the aircraft. Section 21.16, entitled Special Conditions, states the following:

If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain 

adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller 

because of a novel or unusual design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, 

he prescribes special conditions and amendments thereto for the product. The special 

conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of this chapter and contain such safety 

standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA finds necessary to 

establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations. 

See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16. 

Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may

prescribe special conditions for Drofika’s intended operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, which 

contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of 

safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R Sections
22

61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 

91.417(a) & (b).

F. A Summary That Can Be Published In The Federal Register, stating: The Rules From 

Which Drofika Seeks Exemption: 

Drofika seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a)&(b), 91.7(a), 

91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). 

A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption Drofika Seeks: 

This exemption will permit Drofika to commercially operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) 

for the purpose of conducting aerial inspection, video and photography over certain areas of the 

United States. 

G. Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments Available To Support Drofika’s 

Request. 

This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) 

Section 333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain UAS may 

operate safely in the NAS. As such, Drofika’s request for exemption may be granted pursuant to 

the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as set forth above. 

FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a 

hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and 

further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification. 

As discussed in detail above, Drofika will operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS safely in the NAS, 

without creating a hazard to users of the NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to 

national security. 

CONCLUSION

As set forth herein, Drofika Technologies Limited L.L.C seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 

C.F.R. § 11.61 and Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), 

which will permit safe operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS commercially, without an 

airworthiness certificate, for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over 

certain areas of the United States. By granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be 

fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, while 

also advancing the interests of the public, by allowing Drofika to safely, efficiently, and 

economically operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS commercially within the NAS.

WHEREFORE, in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA Modernization 

and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, Drofika Technologies Limited L.L.C respectfully requests 

that the Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R 

Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & 

(a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit Drofika to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS commercially 

for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United 

States.
23

Dated: July 28, 2015

Respectfully submitted by Drofika Technologies Limited L.L.C. 

Wale Oriola & Kevin Mobolade

Appendices: 

A- Link to DJI Phantom 3 Manual: Click on link below

http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_User_Manual_v1.2_en.pd

f

BMonthly Maintenance Log

Month___________ (Year_______________

UAS # Date of inspection Issue Description and 

Maintenance

Conducted

Maintenance

Performed by: 

Engines

Propellers

Airframe

Software

Camera (Gimbal)

Landing Gear

Other