alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023110EN.01000301.xml

| 24.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/3

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.104641

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 110/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 19.12.2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.104641 |
| Member State | Netherlands |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Verlenging van de afdrachtvermindering zeevaart voor Commercial Cruising Vessels (2023-2028) |
| Legal basis | Wet vermindering afdracht loonbelasting en premie voor de volksverzekeringen |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Other |
| Form of aid | |
| Budget | Overall budget: 8 400 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 1 400 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | 1.1.2023 — 31.12.2028 |
| Economic sectors | Water transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat |
| Rijnstraat 8, The Hague, the Netherlands |

Date of adoption of the decision

19.12.2022

Aid number

SA.104641

Member State

Netherlands

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Verlenging van de afdrachtvermindering zeevaart voor Commercial Cruising Vessels (2023-2028)

Legal basis

Wet vermindering afdracht loonbelasting en premie voor de volksverzekeringen

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Other

Form of aid

Budget

Overall budget: 8 400 000 EUR

Annual budget: 1 400 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

1.1.2023 — 31.12.2028

Economic sectors

Water transport

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat

Rijnstraat 8, The Hague, the Netherlands

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Statement of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Kenneth A. Swanstrom,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. (the Company),
hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge:  1.
    The Companys Form 10-K Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2004
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 16, 2005
    
    /s/ Kenneth A. SwanstromKenneth A. Swanstrom,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### The State, ex rel. Brophy, *v.*City of Lakewood et al.

(No. 28461

Decided May 13, 1942.)

*635
      *Mr. Hugh McNamee*and *Mrs. David J. Brophy,*for relator.

*Mr. Charles F. Ross,*for respondents.

Hart, J.

Since this action was filed, all the moneys diverted from the water fund to the general fund of the defendant city have been restored and the order of the court made in the case of *City of Lakewood*v. *Rees, supra,*has been complied with.

This action has, therefore, become moot except as to the question of interest on the funds so diverted while they were held in the general fund. The question remaining to be determined in this action is whether the city is liable to the water fund for such interest.

The same issue here presented was before this court in the case of *City of Lakewood*v. *Rees, supra.*The jurisdiction of the court extended to interest on the fund, if any was due, as it did to the status of the fund itself. If any interest was recoverable it was due and owing up to the. time of the decree of the court. That case, which was an action *in rem,*is *res judicata*not only as to all issues decided, but as to all issues which the court might have decided and as to all persons having an interest in the subject-matter. There was no decree for interest and that determination was final.

With respect to the application of the doctrine of *res judicata,*28 Ohio Jurisprudence, 1068, Section 658, says:

> “The right of a taxpayer to bring a suit on behalf of a municipality under Section 4314, General Code, is barred when the question desired to be raised is one *636that might properly have been raised and litigated in a previous suit brought by the city solicitor, or by another taxpayer, and carried to a final judgment * ** *■”*

The subject-matter of the action in the case of *City of Lakewood*v. *Rees, supra,*was the determination of the status of the fund in question and the judgment of the court in that respect was conclusive. The binding effect of a judgment *in rem*against the *•whole world*prevails as to the *res*or status within the jurisdiction of the court. 31 American Jurisprudence, 102, Section 450.

Having reached this conclusion, this court considers it dispositive of the other questions made in the record. The writ is denied.

*Writ denied.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Bettman, J., not participating.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2690 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit review of certain 

Medicare payment determinations for disproportionate share hospitals, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 17, 2018 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. CORNYN, and Mr. NELSON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit 

review of certain Medicare payment determinations for 

disproportionate share hospitals, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REVIEW OF MEDICARE PAYMENT DETERMINA4 TIONS FOR DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE HOS5 PITALS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1886(r) of the Social Se7 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(r)) is amended by striking 

8 paragraph (3). 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2690 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any claim relat3 ing to a determination made under paragraph (2) of such 

4 section 1886(r) that is pending on a date that is on or 

5 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 311 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-643, CP2024-652.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21339 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 10985 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
GARY WILLIAM ABERNATHY , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15

- CR

- 304

- 1

Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gary William Abernathy appeals his 24

- month revocation sentence. He argues that he is entitled to resentencing because the district court violated his due process rights when it imposed a revocation sentence based on “erroneous information,” specifically the probation officer’s represe ntation that Abernathy had overserved his prior federal sentence by 24 months. Because Abernathy did not object to his revocation sentence before the district court,

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the l imited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 30, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-10985 Document: 00514703756 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/30/2018No. 17

- 10985

2 his present challenge is reviewed for plain error. See United States v. Whitelaw , 580 F. 3d 256, 260 (5th Cir. 2009)

. The Government argues that Abernathy cannot show an effect on his substantial rights because the district court stated in its order in aid of appeal
that it “more likely than not” would have imposed the same 24

- month sentence because “it was particularly concerned about the assault [Abernathy]
commit ted against his wife, ” which served as the basis for revoking his supervised release. Even though the court could not say with “absolute certainty” that it would have imposed the same sentence had the probation officer not provided incorrect information, the fact that the court “more likely than not” would have imposed the same 24

- month sen tence precludes Abernathy from showing a “reasonable probability” of a different outcome on
remand. See United States v. Escalante

- Reyes , 689 F.3d 415, 424 (5th Cir. 2012) (en banc). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 17-10985 Document: 00514703756 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/30/2018
Record of Conversation

January 27, 2014

Nia Daniels of the Office of Rulemaking at the FAA spoke with Talia Roffman of Ameriflight, LLC. In regards to exemption 8480, the CFR cite d in the exemption changed from § 119.3 to § 110.2. Ms. Daniels confirmed through a telepho ne conversation with Ms. Roffman if Ameriflight wanted the exemption under § 119.3, before the CFR changed in 2011. Ms. Roffman confirmed that Ameriflight would like the orig inal exemption before the CFR change with § 119.3, which is now § 110.2.
ccaa_ex102.htm

 EXHIBIT 10.2
  
  
  
  
  	 
	1

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	2

	 

	 


  
  
  
  	 3
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 29 

To prohibit the use of funds for granting deferred action or other immigration 

relief to aliens not lawfully present in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Mr. POE of Texas (for himself, Mr. GARRETT, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mrs. 

BLACK, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. PITTENGER, Mr. ROE of 

Tennessee, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. FRANKS

of Arizona, Mr. COOK, Mr. MARINO, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. WILSON of 

South Carolina, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. 

ROTHFUS, Mr. FINCHER, Mr. BYRNE, Mr. BARLETTA, and Mr. KLINE) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of funds for granting deferred action 

or other immigration relief to aliens not lawfully present 

in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Separation of Powers 

5 Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 29 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS. 

2 (a) FOR DEFERRED ACTION OR PAROLE.—None of 

3 the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to any 

4 Federal department or agency may be used to parole an 

5 alien into the United States or grant deferred action on 

6 a final order of removal, for any reason other than on an 

7 individual case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian rea8 sons. 

9 (b) FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WORK PERMITS OR

10 GREEN CARDS.—None of the funds appropriated or other11 wise made available to any Federal department or agency 

12 may be used to issue to any alien who, on the date of 

13 enactment of this Act, is unlawfully present in the United 

14 States any document attesting to the lawful permanent 

15 resident status of that alien, or to the authorization for 

16 employment in the United States of that alien. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MATI FRANCO, *

* No. 16

- 99 V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: January 26, 2018

* SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; pneumococcal vaccine ; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Guillain- Barré syndrome (“GBS”)

* Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for Petitioner; Ryan D. Pyles

, United States Dep ’ t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1

On January 25, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Mati Franco on January 19, 2016. Petitioner alleged that the pneumococcal vaccine she received on February 20, 2015, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C .F.R. §100.3(a), caused her to suffer Guillain-Barré syndrome

. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on

her behalf as a result of her condition.

Respondent denies that th e pneumococcal vaccine caused petitioner to suffer Guillain-Barré syndrome, or any other injury.

1 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.2

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum payment of $150,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment in cas e 16

- 99 V according to this decision and the attached stipulation. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED

.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.
Exhibit
23


CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-40370, 333-116362, 333-138411 and 333-157804 on Form S-8 and Registration
Statement No. 333-161492 on Form S-3, of our reports dated March 1, 2010,
relating to the consolidated financial statements of Tutor Perini Corporation,
and the effectiveness of Tutor Perini Corporation’s internal control over
financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tutor
Perini Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009.











/s/
Deloitte & Touche, LLP







Los
Angeles, California


March 1,
2010
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Brown & Brown, Inc. (Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Form 10-K), I, Cory T. Walker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m or
§ 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: March 2, 2009



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Cory T. Walker     
|Cory T. Walker         
|Chief Financial Officer



5
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                         4671
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        516
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1003
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                          5962
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     205
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   12357
<COMMON>                                          3518
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            1
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              (792)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                    2727
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               93
<PREFERRED>                                        138
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                              3853
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 402
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                     314
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      247
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        120
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    56
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                    4722
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    12357
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                         4618
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               293
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                        3612
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                        3905
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            713
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  25
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     738
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           402
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1497)<F1>
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         17
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   (1514)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           401
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          373
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                            1038
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.80)
<FN>
<F1>Net income includes an extraordinary item of $3,125 million ($1,834 million
net of $1,291 million of income taxes) reflecting the effects of a Pennsylvania
Public Utility Commission Restructuring Order and deregulation of the Company's
electric generation operations.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023203EN.01001401.xml

| 9.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/14

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.106095

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 203/13)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 25.4.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.106095 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | CATALUNA, COMUNIDAD VALENCIANA, MADRID, CASTILLA-LEON, CASTILLA-LA MANCHA, ASTURIAS, GALICIA, ARAGON, EXTREMADURA, NAVARRA, RIOJA, PAIS VASCO, ANDALUCIA, CANTABRIA, MURCIA |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | ENER — PRÓRROGA DEL MECANISMO DE AJUSTE DEL COSTE DE PRODUCCIÓN PARA LA REDUCCIÓN DEL PRECIO DE LA ELECTRICIDAD EN EL MERCADO MAYORISTA |
| Legal basis | ENER-PRÓRROGA DEL MECANISMO DE AJUSTE DEL COSTE DE PRODUCCIÓN PARA LA REDUCCIÓN DEL PRECIO DE LA ELECTRICIDAD EN EL MERCADO MAYORISTA |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Energy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Production of electricity |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Dirección General de Política Energética y Minas |
| Paseo de la Castellana, 160 — 28071 Madrid |

Date of adoption of the decision

25.4.2023

Aid number

SA.106095

Member State

Spain

Region

CATALUNA, COMUNIDAD VALENCIANA, MADRID, CASTILLA-LEON, CASTILLA-LA MANCHA, ASTURIAS, GALICIA, ARAGON, EXTREMADURA, NAVARRA, RIOJA, PAIS VASCO, ANDALUCIA, CANTABRIA, MURCIA

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

ENER — PRÓRROGA DEL MECANISMO DE AJUSTE DEL COSTE DE PRODUCCIÓN PARA LA REDUCCIÓN DEL PRECIO DE LA ELECTRICIDAD EN EL MERCADO MAYORISTA

Legal basis

ENER-PRÓRROGA DEL MECANISMO DE AJUSTE DEL COSTE DE PRODUCCIÓN PARA LA REDUCCIÓN DEL PRECIO DE LA ELECTRICIDAD EN EL MERCADO MAYORISTA

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Energy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Production of electricity

Name and address of the granting authority

Dirección General de Política Energética y Minas

Paseo de la Castellana, 160 — 28071 Madrid

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---