UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL

AVIATIONADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC

Exemption Request under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 ofthe

Federal Aviation Regulations

Submitted on Monday, June 15, 

2015

Nigel Martin

15143 Leicestershire St.

Woodbridge VA 22191

202-631-5626
SUMMARY

NIGEL MARTIN seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a)

& (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and

91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System pursuant to Section 333 ofthe 

FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This exemption will permit 

NIGEL MARTIN to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAV) for the commercial 

purposeof conducting aerial video and photography in the United States.

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE

PETITIONER

NIGEL MARTIN provides his clients with photography and videography for the purpose 

of advertising and filmmaking. NIGEL MARTIN has hundreds of hours flying experience.

He has 2 years recreational/hobby experience in all aspects of aerial video and 

photography. The objective of NIGEL MARTIN and his aerial operations is toprovide 

high quality imaging for a variety of commercial, public, and residential uses, specifically 

targeting:

• Advertising

• Filmmaking

BACKGROUND

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: DJI Inspire 1 UAV

NIGEL MARTIN seeks an exemption to operate DJI systems for compensation or hire 

within the NAS. The DJI Inspire 1 is a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) Unmanned 

Aircraft (UA) with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or smart 

phone systems. The DJI Inspire 1 has a maximum gross weight of approximately 6.5

pounds, while having a length of 17.75 inches width of 17.24 inches and a height of 11.85

inches, and a maximum speed of approximately 42.76 knots. 

The DJI Inspire 1 UAV is equipped with four main rotors; driven by Lithium Polymer 

battery powered electric motors.
BASIS FOR PETITION

Petitioner, NIGEL MARTIN, pursuant to the provisions of the FederalAviation 

Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

(FMRA), Section 333, Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems, hereby 

petitions the Administrator to commercially operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAV in the 

National Airspace System (NAS), and for an exemption fromthe requirements of 14 

C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a),

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the 

unmanned aircraft and its operation, NIGEL MARTIN’s operation of DJI Inspire 1 UAV

meet the conditions of FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness 

certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.

Accordingly, NIGEL MARTIN requests relief from Sections 91.405(a),91.407(a)(1),

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirementsfor 

maintenance that only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate.

NIGEL MARTIN submits that the requested relief is proper since an equivalent level of

safety will be ensured. NIGEL MARTIN will use experienced personnel or techniciansto 

perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAV using the 

methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., DJIInspire 

1 Maintenance Manual v1.0, DJI Inspire 1 User Manual (EN) v1.2, and DJI Inspire 1 

Safety Guidelines v1.0).

Furthermore, NIGEL MARTIN will document and maintain all maintenance recordsfor 

the DJI Inspire 1 UAV.

Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot

privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, is requested by NIGEL MARTIN to the 

extent necessary to allow a Pilot in Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher level 

certificate, as well as an airman medical certificate, and who has demonstrated, by

meeting minimum flight- hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely

operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAV in a manner consistent with this exemption, including 

evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, 

vessels, vehicles and structures.
NIGEL MARTIN seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness,

because the DJI Inspire 1 UAV do not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance 

with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. As such, NIGEL MARTIN submits that he will ensure 

that the DJI Inspire 1 UAV is in an airworthy condition, prior to every flight, by

determining that the UAV is in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly

Maintenance Log, and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual), and that the aircraft are in a 

condition for safe flight.

NIGEL MARTIN also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121,

entitled Altimeter Settings, as the DJI Inspire 1 UA will not have a typical barometric 

altimeter onboard. However, altitude information of the DJI Inspire 1 UA will be 

provided to the PIC via Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment and radio 

communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active 

monitoring of the flight path. This altitude information, combined with NIGEL

MARTIN’s operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UAV within visual line of sight, at or below 

300 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalentto Section 91.121.

Additionally, NIGEL MARTIN seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 

91.151(b), entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions. NIGEL MARTIN

submits that safety will not be affected by operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UA in visual 

meteorological conditions (VMC) under visual flight rules (VFR), with a minimum of 

30% battery power to fly to the first point of intended landing.

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, NIGEL MARTIN provides the following 

information in support of its petition for exemption:

A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner.

The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is:

NIGEL MARTIN

15143 Leicestershire St.

Woodbridge VA 22191

202-631-5626
B. The Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From Which NIGEL MARTIN Seeks 

Exemption.

1. NIGEL MARTIN Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section

61.113(a) And (b).

Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command,

subsections (a) and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part:

(a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in 

command (PIC) of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for 

compensation or hire; nor may that person, for compensation or hire, act as 

PIC of an aircraft.

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft

in connection with any business or employment if—

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and
(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

2. NIGEL MARTIN Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section

91.7(a).

Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, subsection (a), states the 

following:

(a) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition.

3. NIGEL MARTIN Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section

91.121.

Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, subsection (a), states the following, in 

part:

(a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or 

flight level of that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that

is set, when operating--

(1) Below 18,000 feet MSL, to--

(i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and 

within 100 nautical miles of the aircraft;

(ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) 

of this section, the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate 

available station; or

(iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of

the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available 

before departure.
4. NIGEL MARTIN Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section

91.151(b).

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, subsection

(b), states the following:

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless 

(considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly 

to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to 

fly after that for at least 20 minutes.

5. NIGEL MARTIN Seeks Exemption From The Requirement Of Section

91.405(a).

Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required, subsection (a), states the following:

Each owner or operator of an aircraft—

(a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and 

shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this 

section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.]

6. NIGEL MARTIN Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section

91.407(a)(1)

Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance,

rebuilding, or alteration, subsection (a)(1), states the following:

(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance,

preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless--

(1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under

§ 43.7 of this chapter[.]
7. NIGEL MARTIN Seeks Exemption From The Requirements

Of Sections 91.409(a)(1) And 91.409(a)(2).

Section 91.409, entitled Inspections, subsection (a), states the following:

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate 

an aircraft unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had --

(1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has 

been approved for return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this 

chapter; or

(2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate

in accordance with part 21 of this chapter.

8. NIGEL MARTIN Seeks Exemption From The Requirements

Of Sections 91.417(a) And 91.417(b).

Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records, subsections (a) and (b), state the 

following:

(a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413,

each registered owner or operator shall keep the following records for the

periods specified in paragraph (b) of this section:

(1) Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration 

and records of the 100-hour, annual, progressive, and other required or 

approved inspections, as appropriate, for each aircraft (including the 

airframe) and each engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an aircraft.

The records must include--

(i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator)

of the work performed; and

(ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and

(iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving the 

aircraft for return to service.
(2) Records containing the following information:

(i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each

propeller, and each rotor.

(ii) The current status of life-limited parts of each airframe,

engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance.

(iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the

aircraft which are required to be overhauled on a specified time

basis.

(iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time 

since the last inspection required by the inspection program under 

which the aircraft and its appliances are maintained.

(v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and 

safety directives including, for each, the method of compliance, the

AD or safety directive number and revision date. If the AD orsafety

directive involves recurring action, the time and date when the next

action is required.

(vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for 

each major alteration to the airframe and currently installed engines,

rotors, propellers, and appliances.

(b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the

periods prescribed:

(1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be 

retained until the work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 

year after the work is performed.

(2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be 

retained and transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is

sold.

(3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under §

43.11 of this chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the 

aircraft is approved for return to service.

C. The Extent Of Relief NIGEL MARTIN Seeks And The Reason 

NIGEL MARTIN Seeks The Relief.

1. Extent Of Relief NIGEL MARTIN Seeks And The Reason NIGEL 

MARTIN Seeks Relief From Section 61.113(a) And(b).

Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations:

Pilot in command, is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a private 

pilot or higher level certificate, as well as a current and valid airman medical certificate, 

and who has met certain flight-hour and currency requirements, to conduct the proposed 

UAV flight operations for compensation or hire.

This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b)state 

that a private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in

connection with any business or employment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that 

business or

employment; and (2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation 

or hire.

As set forth more fully below, NIGEL MARTIN submits that an equivalent level ofsafety

will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAV

unless that PIC has met certain flight-hour and currency requirements, demonstrating that 

the PIC is able to safely operate either the DJI Inspire 1 UAV in a manner consistent with 

the operations specifications as described in this exemption, including evasive and 

emergency maneuvers, as well as maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, 

vehicles and structures.

Further, NIGEL MARTIN submits that all flights of the DJI Inspire 1 UAV, conducted 

by the PIC pursuant to the grant of this Petition: (1) will be incidental to NIGEL 

MARTIN’s business; and (2) will not carry passengers or property for compensation or

hire.
2. Extent Of Relief NIGEL MARTIN Seeks And The Reason NIGEL 

MARTIN Seeks Relief From Section 91.7(a).

Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, is requested to the extent

required to allow NIGEL MARTIN to determine that the DJI Inspire 1 UAV is in 

airworthy condition prior to every flight by ensuring that the UAV is in compliance with 

the operating documents (i.e., the NIGEL MARTINAerial Operations Manual, Monthly

Maintenance Log, and DJI INSPIRE 1 Instruction Manual).

NIGEL MARTIN seeks the requested relief because the DJI Inspire 1 UAV do not require 

an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, 

NIGEL MARTIN will ensure that the DJI Inspire 1 UAV is in airworthy condition based 

upon its compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and 

DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual) prior to every flight, and further, determine that the

aircraft are in condition for safe flight, as stated in the conditions and limitations below.

3. Extent Of Relief NIGEL MARTIN Seeks And The Reason NIGEL 

MARTIN Seeks Relief From Section 91.121.

Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, may be required to allow flight

operations of the DJI Inspire 1 UAV, which utilize a barometric pressure sensor, GPS 

equipment, and a radio communications telemetry data link to downlink altitude 

information from the UA to the PIC at the ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA 

requires that any altitude information concerning UAV operations be reported to air traffic 

control (ATC) in feet above ground level (AGL), NIGEL MARTIN seeks the requested 

relief because the DJI Inspire 1 UA’s altimeter may be set on the ground to zero feet AGL, 

rather than the local barometric pressure or field altitude, before each flight.

Considering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is 

sought to the extent necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and limitations 

stated below. As more fully set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will be

maintained since the DJI Inspire 1 UA is equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and 

GPS equipment, which automatically ensures that a ground level pressure setting will be 

established prior to each flight, and provides the PIC with altitude information of the UA 

on the heads-up display of the GCS.
4. Extent Of Relief NIGEL MARTIN Seeks And The Reason 

NIGEL MARTIN Seeks Relief From Section 91.151(b).

Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, is 

requested to the extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJI Inspire UA in 

visual meteorological conditions (VMC) under visual flight rules (VFR), with a minimum 

of 30% battery power to fly to the first point of intended landing. NIGEL MARTIN seeks 

the requested relief because without an exemption from Section 91.151(b), the flight time 

duration of the battery powered DJI Inspire 1 UA will severely constrain the practicality 

of any aerial video or still photo flight operations that NIGEL MARTIN proposes to 

conduct pursuant to this Petition.

Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJI Inspire 1 UAV, 

the DJI Inspire 1 operating documents, and NIGEL MARTIN’s proposed operating 

limitations, ensure that NIGEL MARTINwill safely operate the battery powered DJI 

Inspire 1 UA in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR),

with a minimum of 30% battery power to fly to the first point of intended landing.

5. Extent Of Relief NIGEL MARTIN Seeks And The Reason NIGEL 

MARTIN Seeks Relief From Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1)

& (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b).

Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b)

only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, NIGEL MARTIN requests 

relief from these Sections because the DJI Inspire 1 UAV does not require an 

airworthiness certificate. As set forth more fully below, the DJI Inspire 1 UAV meets

the conditions of FMRA Section 333 for operation without an airworthiness certificate. 

Accordingly, NIGEL MARTIN will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, 

alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAV using the methods, techniques, and 

practices prescribed in the UAV operating documents (i.e., the NIGEL MARTIN

Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction 

Manual). Furthermore, NIGEL MARTIN will document and maintain all maintenance 

records for the DJI Inspire 1 UAV.
D. The Reasons Why Granting NIGEL MARTIN Request Would Be In The

Public Interest; That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As AWhole.

Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing NIGEL MARTIN

to safely, efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography in the 

United States.

Additionally, use of the DJI Inspire 1 UAV will decrease congestion of the NAS, reduce 

pollution, and provide significant benefits to the economy. Notably, the benefits of 

NIGEL MARTIN’s proposed operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UAV will be realized without 

implicating any privacy issues.

1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS.

The DJI Inspire 1 UA is battery powered and serve as a safe, efficient, and economical 

alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery. By

reducing the amount of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an 

exemption allowing the use of a DJI Inspire 1 UAV would reduce the amount of manned 

aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise and air pollution, as well as increase the safety of life 

and property in the air and on the ground.

Furthermore, by reducing the number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS,

congestion around airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The 

DJI Inspire 1 UA does not require an airport to takeoff or land. Likewise, a reduction of 

manned aircraft conducting aerial video and photography missions would result in fewer 

aircraft that must be handled by air traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, 

arrival, and landing phases of flight operations.
2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The

DJI Inspire 1 UAV.

Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJI Phantom 2 and DJI Phantom 3 UAVs, instead 

of manned aircraft, will greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air

and noise pollution generated during traditional aerial video and still photography flight

operations. By using battery power and electric motors, the DJI Inspire 1 UAV produce 

no air pollution, and is the most viable environmentally conscious alternative to the cabin 

class, six cylinder internal combustion engine aircraft that are typically utilized for aerial 

video and photography, while burning approximately 20-30 gallons per hour of leaded 

aviation fuel. The DJI Inspire 1 UA, while reducing the carbon footprint of aerial 

acquisitions, also eliminates noise pollution, as the UA is propelled by battery powered 

electric motors, rather than an internal combustion engine.

By using the DJI Inspire 1 UAV to perform aerial acquisitions, the substantial risk to life 

and property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with traditional 

manned aircraft flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely eliminated. 

Aside from the lack of flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the DJI Inspire 1

UA has less physical potential for collateral damage to life and property on the ground, 

and in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct similar operations 

(weighing approximately 6,000 pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42 feet, a 

length of 34 feet, and a fuel capacity of 180 gallons).

3. Performing Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The

DJI Inspire 1 UAV Will Benefit The Economy.

In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI Inspire 1 UAV is also an economical 

alternative to using manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As such, 

operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UAV will allow United States based companies, like 

NIGEL MARTIN, to remain competitive and contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. 

Specifically, with the rising cost of aviation fuel and the Environmental Protection 

Agency (“EPA”) regulatory actions phasing out leaded aviation fuels, U.S. owned and 

operated companies must adopt new and alternative technology in order to remain 

competitive. Operating the battery powered DJI Inspire 1 UAV is one such technology

that not only allows companies greater operational flexibility compared to manned 

aircraft, but provides such flexibility without the high operational cost of a traditional 
manned aircraft.

By operating the DJI Inspire 1 UAV, companies such as NIGEL MARTIN, can remain 

competitive and profitable, and therefore, provide greater job stability to employees and 

contractors, which will ultimately contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Improved 

financial performance of U.S. companies, through commercialuse of the DJI Inspire 1

UAV, provides a stable workforce that increases consumer spending; improves local, 

state, and federal tax revenues; and allows companies to invest in research and 

development in order to remain competitive both in the United States and abroad.

4. There Are No Privacy Issues.

Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted for 

decades, NIGEL MARTIN’s proposed operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UAV will not 

implicate any privacy issues. Specifically, the DJI Inspire 1 UAV will be operated only in 

compliance with operating documents (i.e., the NIGEL MARTIN Aerial Operations 

Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJIInspire 1 Instruction Manual) which requires 

property owner involvement as well as local law enforcement notification, and in 

accordance with the FederalAviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude 

requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119.

E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect

Safety, Or How The Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal 

ToThat Provided By The Rule From Which NIGEL MARTIN Seeks Exemption.

1. Reasons Why The DJI Inspire 1 UA Meets The Conditions Of The 

FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333.

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the 

unmanned aircraft and its operation, NIGEL MARTIN’s operation of the DJI Inspire 1

UAV meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333, and will notrequire an airworthiness 

certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.

Section 333 provides authority for a UAV to operate without airworthiness certification

and sets forth requirements for considering whether a UAV will create a hazard to users of

the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specifically,FMRA

Section 333 states the following, in part:
(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and

not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of

Transportation shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may 

operate safely in the national airspace system before completion of the plan 

and rulemaking required by section 332 of this Act or the guidance required

by section 334 of this Act.

(b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.--In making the determination 

under subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum--

(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their 

size, weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and

populated areas, and operation within visual line of sight do not create 

a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public or pose 

a threat to national security; and

(2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or 

airworthiness certification under section 44704 of title 49, United

States Code, is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft

systems identified under paragraph (1).

(c) Requirements for Safe Operation.--If the Secretary determines under this 

section that certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the 

national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the 

safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.

In seeking this exemption, NIGEL MARTIN submits that the DJI Inspire 1 UAV can 

operate safely in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by: (a) the 

characteristics of the DJI Inspire 1 UAV;

(b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific operating limitations.
a. The Specifications Of The DJI Inspire 1 UAV Demonstrates Its 

Safe Characteristics.

The DJI Inspire 1 UAV does not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or 

otherwise pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and

operational capability.

i. Technical Specifications Of The DJI Inspire 1 UAV.

The technical specifications of the DJI Inspire 1 is set forth by the DJI Inspire 1 User 

Manual, attached hereto as AppendixA.

ii. The DJI Inspire 1 UAV Autonomous Flight And Navigation 

Modes Enable The UAV To Remain Within A Defined Operational

Area.

The DJI Inspire 1 UAV may be operated in both manual and fully autonomous flight 

modes. A complete description of the flight and navigational modesof the DJI Inspire 1

UAV is provided in the DJI Inspire 1 User Manual, attached hereto as Appendix A.

iii. The DJI Inspire 1 UAV is Designed For Automatic Return To 

Home Point Or Hover In The Event Of Loss Of The Control Link 

Or Navigation.

When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Inspire 1 UA will remain stationary, in flight, for 3 

seconds or more. If, after 3 seconds, the DJI Phantom 2 andDJI Phantom 3 UAV do not 

reacquire control link data from the GCS, the UAV will assume that the Control Link is 

lost and the UA will return to the home position (i.e., failsafe mode) via GPS, and will 

descend to the takeoff position and shutdown.

A complete description of the Failsafe Functions of the DJI Inspire 1 UAV is setforth in 

the User Manual, attached hereto as Appendix A.
iv. The DJI Inspire 1 GCS And Its Operation.

A complete description of the operation and specifications of the DJI Inspire 1 GCS and 

flight control software is provided in the User Manual attached hereto as Appendix A.

b. Flight Operations Of DJI Inspire 1 UAV is Limited To The Line Of 

Sight Of A Certificated Pilot in Command WithA Safety Observer.

NIGEL MARTIN will be the only person to act as a pilot in command (PIC) of theDJI

Inspire 1 UAV. Additionally, a safety observer will assist in flights.

c. Flights Of DJI Inspire 1 UAV Will Be Conducted Pursuant 

To Specific Operating Limitations.

In seeking this exemption, NIGEL MARTIN proposes to commercially operate DJI

Inspire 1 UAV for the special purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over

certain areas of United States, pursuant to the following specific operating limitations:

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the 

following aircraft described in the operating documents, rotorcraft UAVs

weighing less than 55 pounds maximum gross weight: DJI Inspire 1

Unmanned Aircraft System. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will 

require a new petition or a petition to amend this grant.

2. UAV operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting

operations for the purpose of aerial video and photography.

3. The UA may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 300 feet above 

ground level (AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operating 
documents unless a special request is made and approved by ATC. All altitudes 

reported to ATC must be in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at

all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any

device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued 

airman medical certificate.

6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is

not permitted.

7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to 

satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS

capability. The SO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all

times. Electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight 

operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer 

his or her designation for the duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that 

the SO can perform the functions prescribed in the operating documents.

8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with 

seeing and avoiding other air traffic and other ground based obstacles/

obstructions and is not permitted to operate the camera or other instruments.

9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible 

during UAV operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If

a discrepancy exists between the conditions and limitations contained in the 

grant of exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, the 

conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption take precedence 

and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as 

outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revise its 

operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions 
and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator upon request.

The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for 

extension or amendment to the grant of exemption. If the operator determines 

that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAAgranted 

the exemption, then the operator must petition for amendment to its grant of

exemption. The FAA’s UAV Integration Office (AFS-80) may be contacted if

questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents.

10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAV to ensure that it is in a 

condition for safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affectsthe 

safe operation of the UAV, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the 

necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAV is found to be in a 

condition for safe flight. The Ground Control Station must be included in the 

preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations must be properly

documented in the aircraft records.

11. Any UAV that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the 

UAV operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical 

component, must undergo a functional test flight. The PIC who conductsthe 

functional test flight must make an entry in the aircraft records.

12. The pre-flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g.

inoperable components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the 

relevant sections of the operating documents.

13. The operator must follow the UAV manufacturer’s aircraft/component,

maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements.
14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record 

keeping requirements, in accordance with the operating documents.

Maintenance, inspection, alterations, and status of replacement/overhaul 

component parts must be noted in the aircraft records, including total time in 

service, description of work accomplished, and the signature of the authorized 

person returning the UAV to service.

15. Each UAV operated under this exemption must comply with all 

manufacturer Safety Bulletins.

16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the 

corrective action taken against discrepancies discovered between inspections.

17. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the 

operator’s qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate 

the UAV in a manner consistent with how the UAV will be operated under the 

exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining 

appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC 

qualification flight hours must be logged in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R.

§ 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs arepermitted 

under the terms of the exemption. However, training operationsmay only be 

conducted during dedicated training sessions. During training, proficiency, and 

experience-building flights, all persons not essential forflight operations are 

considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate 

distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 91.119.

18. UAV operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R.

§ 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions 

(VMC). If flight at night is required, a special request will be made at the FAA

office closest to proposed area of operations. Flights under special visual flight

rules (SVFR) are not authorized.
19. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airportreference 

point as denoted on a current FAA-published aeronautical chart unless a letter 

of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained, and the operation is 

conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s COA.

The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available 

to the Administrator upon request.

20. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 

feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles

from the PIC.

21. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a 

pre- determined location within the planned operating area and land or be 

recovered in accordance with the operating documents.

22. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or 

emergencies in accordance with the operating documents.

23. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind

and forecast weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal

cruising speed to the intended landing point and land the UA with 25% 

battery power remaining.
24. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO)issued 

Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any

operations under the grant of exemption. This COA will also require the 

operatorto request a Notice to Airman (NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in 

advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to the operation. All operations shall 

be conducted in accordance with airspace requirements in the ATO issued COA

including class of airspace, altitude level and potential transponder

requirements.

25. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by

serial number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have 

identification (N- Number) markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45,

Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.

26. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for 

operation and control of the UA must comply with the FederalCommunications 

Commission (FCC) or other appropriate government oversight agency

requirements.

27. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be 

available to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAV any time the 

UAV is operating. These documents must be made available to the 

Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

28. The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned aviation 

operations and activities at all times.

29. The UAV may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.
30. Flight operations must be conducted at least 200 feet from all 

nonparticipating persons (persons other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or 

essential persons), vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect

nonparticipating persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an

accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain 

under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating 

persons leave such protection and are within 200 feet of the UA, flight 

operations must cease immediately and/or;

b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the 

owner/controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted 

permission and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of

operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present

an undue hazard, and;

c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential 

persons do not present an undue hazard to those persons per § 

91.119(a).

31. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property 

with permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative.

Permission from land owner/controller or authorized representative will be 

obtained for each flight to be conducted.

32. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or 

vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA

must be reported to the FAA's UAV Integration Office (AFS-80) within 24 

hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation SafetyBoard 

(NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site
2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section

61.113(a) And (b) Would Not Adversely AffectSafety.

NIGEL MARTIN submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 

61.113(a) and (b) will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate theDJI

Inspire 1 UAV unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and 

currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAV in a 

manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Considering NIGEL MARTIN’s proposed area of operations, and the operating limitations 

set forth-above; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements to 

those of commercial pilot requirements (See Exemption No. 11062); and the airmanship 

skills necessary to safely operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAV, NIGEL MARTIN submits that 

the additional manned airmanship experience of a commercially certificated pilot would 

not correlate to the airmanship skills necessary for NIGEL MARTIN’s specific proposed 

flight operations.

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAV,in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g.Exemption 

Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136,

11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

NIGEL MARTIN will not allow any PIC to operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAV unless that PIC 

has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour requirements or the DJI Inspire 1 UAV

training and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Inspire 1

UAV in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency 

maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and

structures.

Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14

C.F.R. § 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAV rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 

hours of those hours as a UAV pilot operating the same make and model of UAV to be 

used for operations under the exemption). In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC 

must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes).
As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight experience that

was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of

safety during NIGEL MARTIN’s proposed operations. The Administrator has heldthat

prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable 

regulations would ensure safe operations, stating as follows:

In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for 

the purpose of motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have 

accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of 

total time as a UAV rotorcraft pilot including at least 10 hours logged as a UAV

pilot with a multi-rotor UAV. Prior to operations under Exemption No. 11062, the 

PIC must also have accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 hours as a UAV pilot

operating the same make and model of UAV to be used for operations under the 

exemption. For clarification, the FAA considers these minimum hour requirements 

to be inclusive rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and model time may be

included in the 10 hours of multi-rotor time and the 10 hours may be included in the 

total 25 hours of UAV rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC 

must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency

purposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the flight-hour requirements in 

Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build proficiency in the skills 

necessary to safely conduct the petitioner’s proposed operations. The FAA also 

finds that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with 

applicable regulations would satisfy this requirement. Training, proficiency, and 

experience-building flights can also be conducted under the grant of exemption to 

accomplish the required flight time. During training, proficiency, and experiencebuilding flights the PIC is required to operate the UA with appropriate distances in 

accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119.

Exemption No. 11138 at page 15.

Accordingly, NIGEL MARTIN will ensure safe operations by not allowing any PICto 

operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAV unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum 

flight-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Inspire 

1 UAV in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency 

maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and

structures.
3. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a) 

Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because 

prior to every flight, NIGEL MARTIN will ensure that the Inspire 1 UAV is in an 

airworthy condition based upon the UAV’s compliance with its operating documents and 

as stated in the conditions and limitations herein.

Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific to UAV,

in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption 

Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136,

11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

4. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121 

Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintained because the 

altitude information of the DJI Inspire 1 UA will be provided to the PIC via GPS 

equipment and a radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA 

to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path and altitude.This altitude information, 

combined with NIGEL MARTIN’s operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UA within visual line of 

sight, at or below 300 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. 

The altitude information will be generated by GPS equipment installed onboard the 

aircraft. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude initiation point is automatically established by

the UAVs at ground level.

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.121 specific to UAV, in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g.Exemption 

Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138,

11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).
5. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section

91.151(b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14

C.F.R. Section 91.151(b) as a result of (1) the technical specifications of the DJI Inspire 1

UAV; (2) the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location of the

proposed flight operations. Accordingly, NIGEL MARTIN will ensure that it will safely

operate the battery powered DJI Inspire 1 UA during daylight hours in VFR conditions, 

with at least 30% battery power to fly to the first point of intended landing.

Here, as in Exemption No. 11109, the technical specifications of the DJI Inspire 1 UAV; 

the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and the location of the proposed 

operations, will ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 

91.151(b). Furthermore, safety will be ensured as the DJI Inspire 1 UAV provide audible 

and visual warnings to the PIC at the GCS when the UAV experiences low battery voltage, 

the first warning occurring at approximately 33% remaining battery power, and again at 

approximately 10% remaining battery power. At the critically low battery level, the DJI 

Inspire 1 UAV will descend and land automatically.

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91.151 

establish that safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and 

operating limitations of the UAV are considered. Relief has been granted for manned 

aircraft to operate at less than the minimums prescribed in Section 91.151, including 

Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650. Moreover, the FAA has previously granted relief

from Section 91.151 specific to UAV, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to 

those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 8811, 10808, 10673, 11042, 11062,

11063,11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 

11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).
6. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would

Not Adversely Affect Safety.

In seeking this exemption, NIGEL MARTIN submits that the equivalent level ofsafety 

with regard to the regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by

Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met

because NIGEL MARTIN will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, 

or preventive maintenance on the UAVs using the methods, techniques, and practices 

prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., the NIGEL MARTINAerial Operations 

Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, 

NIGEL MARTIN will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Inspire 

1 UAV.

Since the DJI Inspire 1 UAV will be inspected as prescribed by the operating documents, 

NIGEL MARTIN will maintain the equivalent level ofsafety established by Sections 

91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1), and 91.409(a)(2). A copy of theDJI Inspire 1 User Manual is

attached hereto as Appendix A; a copy of the DJI Inspire 1 UAV Maintenance LOG is 

attached hereto as Appendix B.

Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safety because NIGEL MARTIN

will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance 

on the UAV using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed by the operating

documents.

Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety 

established by Sections 91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the 

DJI Inspire 1 UAV will be performed by trained technicians.

Maintenance will be documented and maintained utilizing the monthly maintenance log.

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a),

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not

adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAV

are considered.

In consideration of NIGEL MARTIN’s proposed operating limitations, the operating 

documents, and the technical aspects of the DJI Inspire 1 UAV, NIGEL MARTIN submits 

that safety will not be adversely affected by granting exemption from 14 C.F.R. Sections
91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) and (a)(2), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a)

and (b). The FAA has previously granted relief specific to UAV in circumstances similar,

in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063,

11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153,

11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operation.

In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

(FMRA) and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16 entitled Special Conditions, NIGEL MARTIN requests that

the FAA prescribe special conditions for the intended operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UAV, 

which contain such safety standards that the Administratorfinds necessary to establish a 

level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R 

§§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7 (a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & 

(a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). Such special conditions will permit safe operation of the UAV

for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of 

the United States for compensation or hire. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements 

for considering whether a UAV will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or 

otherwise pose a threat to nationalsecurity; and further, provides the authority for such 

UAV to operate without airworthiness certification in accordance with any requirements 

that must be established for the safe operation of the UAV in the NAS.

Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R.

§ 21.16, for operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UAV, since the airworthiness regulations of 

14 C.F.R. Part 21 do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the 

novel or unusual design features of the aircraft. Section 21.16, entitled Special 

Conditions, states the following:

If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain 

adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller 

because of a novel or unusual design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or 

propeller, he prescribes special conditions and amendments thereto for the product. 

The special conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of this chapter and 

contain such safety standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the 

FAA finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in 

the regulations.

See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16.
Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAAmay

prescribe special conditions for Leading Edge’s intended operation of the DJI Inspire 1

UAV, which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to 

establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, 

and 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

• A Summary That Can Be Published In The FederalRegister,

stating: The Rules From Which NIGEL MARTIN Seeks Exemption:

NIGEL MARTIN seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.RSections 

61.113(a)&(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & 

(a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption NIGEL MARTIN

Seeks:

This exemption will permit NIGEL MARTIN to commercially operate an 

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAV) for the purpose of conducting aerial video and 

photography in the United States.

• Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments Available

To Support NIGEL MARTIN’s Request.

This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

(FMRA) Section 333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if

certain UAV may operate safely in the NAS. As such, NIGEL MARTIN’s request for

exemption may be granted pursuant to the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. 

Part 11, as set forth above.
FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAV will create

a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to nationalsecurity;

and further, provides the authority for such UAV to operate without airworthiness 

certification.

As discussed in detail above, NIGEL MARTIN will operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAV safely

in the NAS, without creating a hazard to users of the NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose 

a threat to nationalsecurity.
CONCLUSION

As set forth herein, NIGEL MARTIN seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61

and Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), whichwill 

permit safe operation of the DJI Inspire 1 UAV commercially, without an airworthiness 

certificate, for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over 

certain areas of the United States. By granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will 

be fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 

2012, while also advancing the interests of the public, by allowing NIGEL MARTIN to 

safely, efficiently, and economically operate the DJI Inspire 1 UAV commercially within 

the NAS.

WHEREFORE, in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, NIGEL MARTINrespectfully

requests that the Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements 

of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1),

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit Leading Edge to operate the DJI

Inspire 1 UAV commercially for the purpose of conducting aerial video and 

photography over certain areas of the United States.

Dated: April 20, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

NIGEL MARTIN

15143 Leicestershire St

Woodbridge, VA 22191

202-631-5626
Appendices:

A – DJI Inspire 1 User Manual:

B – Monthly Maintenance Log

C – DJI Inspire 1 Technical Specifications
APPENDIX – C

DJI PHANTOM 2 VISION+ TECHNICALSPECIFICATIONS
Aircraft

Model: T600

Weight (Battery Included): 2935 g

Hovering Accuracy (GPS Mode): Vertical: 0.5 m, Horizontal: 2.5 m

Max Angular Velocity: Pitch: 300°/s, Yaw: 150°/s

Max Tilt Angle: 35°

Max Ascent Speed: 5 m/s

Max Descent Speed: 4 m/s

Max Speed: 22 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind)

Max Flight Altitude: 4500 m

Max Wind Speed Resistance: 10 m/s

Max Flight Time: Approximately 18 minutes

Motor Model: DJI 3510

Propeller Model: DJI 1345

Indoor Hovering: Enabled by default

Operating Temperature Range: -10° to 40° C

Diagonal Distance: 559 to 581 mm

Dimensions: 438x451x301 mm

Gimbal

Model: ZENMUSE X3

Output Power (With Camera): Static: 9 W

In Motion: 11 W

Operating Current: Station: 750 mA, Motion: 900 mA

Angular Vibration Range: ±0.03°

Mounting: Detachable

Controllable Range: Pitch: -90° to +30°, Pan: ±320°

Mechanical Range: Pitch: -125° to +45°, Pan: ±330°

Max Controllable Speed: Pitch: 120°/s, Pan: 180°/s

Remote Controller

Name: C1

Operating Frequency: 922.7~927.7 MHz (Japan Only), 5.725~5.825 GHz, 2.400~2.483 GHz

Transmitting Distance (Outdoor And Unobstructed): 2 km

EIRP: 10dBm@900m, 13dBm@5.8G, 20dBm@2.4G

Power Supply: Built-in battery

Charging: DJI charger

Dual User Capability: Host-and-Slave connection (Slave for Camera Control)

Mobile Device Holder: Tablet or Phone

Max Mobile Device Width: 170mm

Output Power: 9 W

Operating Temperature Range: -10° to 40° C
Storage Temperature Range: Less than 3 months: -20° to 45° C, More than 3 months: 22° to 28° C

Charging Temperature Range: 0-40° C

Battery: 6000 mAh LiPo 2S

Charger

Model: A14-100P1A

Voltage: 26.3 V

Rated Power: 100 W

Battery (Standard)

Name: Intelligent Flight Battery

Model: TB47

Capacity: 4500 mAh

Voltage: 22.2 V

Battery Type: LiPo 6S High voltage battery

Energy: 99.9 Wh

Net Weight: 570 g

Operating Temperature Range: -10° to 40° C

Storage Temperature Range: Less than 3 months: -20° to 45° C., More than 3 months: 22° C to 28° C

Charging Temperature Range: 0° to 40° C

Max Charging Power: 180 W

Battery (Optional)

Name: Intelligent Flight Battery

Model: TB48

Capacity: 5700 mAh

Voltage: 22.8 V

Battery Type: LiPo 6S

Energy: 129.96 Wh

Net Weight: 670 g

Operating Temperature Range: -10° to 40° C

Storage Temperature Range: Less than 3 months: -20 to 45° C, More than 3 months: 22° to 28° C

Charging Temperature Range: 0° to 40° C

Max Charging Power: 180 W

Vision Positioning

Velocity Range: Below 8 m/s (2 m above ground)

Altitude Range: 5-500 cm

Operating Environment: Brightly lit (lux > 15) patterned surfaces

Operating Range: 0-250 cm

DJI Pilot App

Mobile Device System Requirements: iOS 8.0 or later, Android 4.1.2 or later