alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

118) ll-E-78 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:07AM Sheet 118 of 264 
P.2 

FEB 14 '97 

VZ/X9/U 

04:84PM GLASFORMS INC 

l? ie:13 S19199410234 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Company; 

FES KIP NC 

P. 3/3 

Bloo2:/oo2 

A 945 2 

ll-E-7 ^ 

Contact Report 

Plastic Composites NESHAP 

Greg LaFlam, Pacific Environmental Services. Inc. (PES) 

October 30,1996 

Mr. Ken Bass, Eav. Health and Safety 

Glosfonns, Inc., San Jose, CA 

Telephone Number: (408)297-9300 

Contact Summary: 

Discussion of Glasfonns' operations to clarify ihe company's response to Ihe 1993 EPA 

screening survey. Glasfonns produces a variety of cross-sectional lineals on nine puftrusioa 

lines. 

A single mix vessel (55-gallon dram) is used to produce resin matrix for all nine 

puUmsioa machines Reeb is pumped foin a 6^000-gallon storage taj_k to the mix room. The 

mix vessel has a cover with a lunged flip lid through which resin and other ingredients are added. 

The lid has a slot through which the l/2"-diamcter inker shaft »inserted. Mr. Bass said that the 

mixer is not actively vented, and that no pressure builds up during mixing to expel styrene 

vapors. Since styrene is "heavier" than air, vapors stay in the mixer. 

All of me pultrusion resin baths have see-through plastic c©vera(l5~niil) that totally 

enclose the bath, except fcr slots to allow the winfbroeinem to eotei and exit the bath. These 

covers are changed out approximately twice per week. The plant works 24-hour shifts, shutting 

down Saturday morning and reopening on Monday morning. 

Testing, involving the participation of me Bay Area Distria and the contractor CH2M 

HS1L has been carried out on the pultrusion operation, These tests were performed using a "tent," 

and reveal the emissions difference between covered and uncovered resin baths. Mr. Bass 

offered to send the test report to PES, subject to approval by the company Vice-President (Terry 

McQuaxxie). 

REPORT IS ACCURATE 

£-/Y-97
##### 



First Amendment to the
Phelps Dodge 2003 Stock Option
and Restricted Stock Plan
  RECITALS
    AMENDMENT
  1.
    
    Section 5.2 Option Price is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by the
following new Section 5.2:
 Option Price
 2.
    
    The remaining provisions of the Plan not amended hereby shall remain in full force and
effect.
 3.
    
    The effective date of this First Amendment shall be December 6, 2006.
 th
 Phelps Dodge Corporation/s/ Nancy F. MailhotNancy F. MailhotSenior Vice PresidentHuman Resources
# C_2022421EN.01000101.xml

| 4.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/1

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case M.10561 – CINTRA / ABERTIS / ITINERE / BIP & DRIVE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 421/01)

On 7 October 2022, the European Commission received notification (1) of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) (‘Merger Regulation’).

On 26 October 2022, the notifying parties informed the Commission that they withdrew their notification.

---

(1)  OJ C 395, 14.10.2022, p. 12.

(2)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### PATTERSON v. STATE.

No. 20869.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 13, 1940.

Heidingsfelder & Wander, Frank Campbell, and David R. Rosenthal, all of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary .for two years.

The injured party, L. D. Robinson, testified that he lost a Maytag washing machine from his premises on the 3rd day of April, 1939. He said he bought the machine July 22, 1936, it being new at the time. He paid $156.16 for it. The machine was used about once a week to do the home laundry. At the time it was stolen it was in the open near a well. Recently after the theft appellant was found in possession of the machine. A witness for appellant testified that the reasonable market value of the washing machine was $15.

It is shown in bill of exception No. 2 that the injured party testified that the reasonable market value of the machine was $65. He based his opinion on conversations he had with Mr. Schwartz and Mr. Bartay. In bill of exception No. 3 it is shown that on cross-examination the injured party testified that in talking to Mr. Schwartz and Mr. Bartay he told them that his Maytag washing machine was about two years old. He did not inform them that the machine was approximately two years and nine months old. Counsel for appellant requested the court to withdraw from the consideration of the jury the testimony of the witness to the effect that the reasonable market value of the machine was $65, such request being based upon the fact that the witness testified that it was only pursuant to his conversations with Mr. Bartay and Mr. Schwartz that he was acquainted with the market value of the machine. This request should have been granted. We quote from 41 Texas Jurisprudence 27, as follows: “Value as it relates to stolen property is the market value at the time and place of the taking, or, in case of property without a market value, the cost of replacing it.” In view of the fact that there was a sharp issue as to the market value of the machine, we are constrained to hold that the refusal of the court to withdraw the testimony constitutes reversible error.

*1031The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 77814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21821]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-122-2024]


Approval of Subzone Status; Catalent Pharma Solutions, LLC; 
Winchester, Kentucky

    On July 23, 2024, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade 
Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Louisville & 
Jefferson County Riverport Authority, grantee of FTZ 29, requesting 
subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 29, on 
behalf of Catalent Pharma Solutions, LLC, in Winchester, Kentucky.
    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and 
Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public 
comment (89 FR 60861, July 29, 2024). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed 
the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. 
Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive 
Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 29Y 
was approved on September 19, 2024, subject to the FTZ Act and the 
Board's regulations, including section 400.13, and further subject to 
FTZ 29's, 2,000-acre activation limit.

    Dated: September 19, 2024.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-21821 Filed 9-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Joe NEWTON v. STATE.

No. 14877.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 13, 1932.

Rehearing Denied June 22, 1932.

Frank Judkins, of Eastland, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, P. J.

Theft is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

This is a companion case to Cole Oglesby v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 51 S.W.(2d) 587, recently decided. In this case the appellant is charged with the theft of the property described in the companion case mentioned. The facts and the defensive theories are identical with those discussed in the companion case, and, upon the áuthority of that case, the judgment in the present instance is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

HAWKINS, J.

Attention is called to the opinion on rehearing- in the companion case of Newton v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 51 S.W.(2d) 590, this day delivered. It is not necessary to again write at length. The exact questions appear in this case as in No. 14878, and the same action is called for.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3082 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 5919 Chef Menteur Highway in New Orleans, 

Louisiana, as the ‘‘Daryle Holloway Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3082 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DARYLE HOLLOWAY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 5919 Chef Menteur Highway in 

4 New Orleans, Louisiana, shall be known and designated 

5 as the ‘‘Daryle Holloway Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Daryle Holloway Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 1, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# ,~I:"'.'**~.** OKLAHOMA**OEPA~TMENT** Of ENVIRONMENTM QUALITY STEVEN A. THOMPSON Executive Director

November 14,2011
Dr. Alfredo Armendariz, Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency

- Region VI (6 PD-L) 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas TX 75202-2733 MARY FALLIN Governor

Subject: Negative declaration for existing Sewage Sludge Incinerator units constructed on or before October 14, 2010 in accordance with 40 CFR 60.5010 subpartMMMM DearDr. Armendariz: Under Section 11I(d) of the Clean Air Act, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published regulations in 40 CFR Part 60, subpart MMMM, which requires states to submitplans 

### in order to control emissions ofdesignated pollutants from designated facilities. In the event that a state does not have a particular designated facility located within its boundaries, EPA requires that a negative declaration be submitted in lieu'of a control plan. Therefore, the Oklahoma Department ofEnvironmental Quality is submitting this letter to certify that, in accordance with 40 CFR Part 60.5010, subpart MMMM, there are no existing Sewage Sludge Incinerator units constructed on or before October 14,2010 in operation under the jurisdiction ofthe State of Oklahoma. If you have questions or require additional information, please contact Cheryl Bradley, Environmental Programs Manager, at (405) 702-4100.

Sine ely,

-

die Terrill, Division DirectorAir Quality CC: SteveThompson, Executive Director, DepartmentofEnvironmental Quality VUuy Donaldson, SectionChief, AirPlanning Section, EPARegion VI (6PD-L)

Kenneth Boyce, Environmental Protection Specialist, AirPlanning Section (6PD-L)

707 NORTH ROBINSON, P.O. BOX 1677, OKLAHOMA(I!Y, OKlAHOMA 73101-1677 printed on recycled paper with soy ink.**.~.**
J

- S43018

- 16

NON
- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION
- SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
JEFFREY AMSLER, KARE N AMSLER, AND KATHRYN CORRIGAN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Appellants

v.

ORCHARD HOUSE PROPER TIES LLC, FRED R. AMSLER JR., FRED R. AMSLER JR. LIVING TRUST, DO NNA J. AMER, AND CAMBRIDGE TRAINING P ARTNERS L.P.
Appellees No. 1893 MDA 2015

Appeal from the Order September 25 , 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas of Sullivan County Civil Division at No(s): 2013

- CV

- 253

BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., PANELLA, J., and JENKINS, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, J. FILED JUNE 21, 2016
Appellants, Jeffrey Amsler, Karen Amsler, and Kathryn Corrigan,
appeal from the order entered September 25, 2015, in the court of Common
Pleas of Sullivan County. After careful review, we dismiss Appellants’ appeal

as moot.
Appellants appeal from the September 25, 2015 order granting
Appellees’ motion for reconsideration of the l ower court’s May 14, 2015
order overruling Appellees’ preliminary objection to compel arbitration. Prior
to the instant appeal, Appellees filed a timely appeal from the court’s May
14, 2015 order at docket number 1029 MDA 2015. By memorandum opinion

filed February 17, 2016, a panel of this Court vacated the trial court’s MayJ

- S43018

- 16

- 2

-

14, 2015 order overruling Appellees’ preliminary objection to enforce the
arbitration agreement and remanded the case for further proceedings. See
Amsler v. Orchard House Properties LLC , 1029 MDA 2015 (Pa. Super.,
filed Feb. 17, 2016) (mem. op.) (Panella, J.). The resolution of those
proceedings is still pending in the court below.
As this Court has vacated the trial court’s May 14, 2015 order, it
necessarily follows that the court’s Se ptember 25, 2015 order granting
Appellees’ motion for reconsideration of that order, from which this appeal is
taken, is a legal nullity. Accordingly, Appellants’ appeal from the September
25, 2015 order is rendered moot.
Appellant’s appeal is dismissed as moot.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 6/21/2016
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: August 15, 2014
TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

–2013

- 0602
FROM: Ray

Saracino , EPA
SUBJECT: August 14, 2014 M eeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing

Power Plants

**SUMMARY**
A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on August 14, 2014 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2 , 2014

. **ATTENDEES** Henry Darwin, Director, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) Eric Massey , Deput y Director, ADEQ Steve Burr, ADEQ Trevor Bagiore, ADEQ Mike Tollstrup, California Air Resources Board (ARB) Bob Weisenmiller, Chairman, California Energy Commission (CEC) Melissa Jones, staffer, California Energy Commission (CEC) Colleen Cripps, Administrator, Nevada Department of Environmental Protection (NDEP) Dave Emme, Deputy

Administrator, NDEP Jasmine Mehta, Bureau Chief, NDEP John Candelaria, Policy

Advisor, P UCN Anne

- Marie Cuneo, Director of Regulatory Operations, PUCN Paul Thomsen, Director, Nevada Energy Office Brita Try ggvi, Deput y Director, Nevada Energy Office Janet McCabe, Acting Assistant Administrator, EPA Reid Harvey , Director, Clean Air Markets Divi sion Jeremy Mark, OAP, Clean Air Markets Division Matt Clouse, OAP, Climate Protection Partnership Division Beth Conlin, OAP, Clean Air Markets Division Gabrielle Stevens, OAP, Clean Air Markets Division Erika Wilson, OAP Amy Vasu, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Jim Ketcham

- Colwill, Office of Policy Anal ys is and ReviewDebra Dalcher, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards David Solomon, Office of Air Qualit y Planning and Standards Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, EPA R9 Deborah Jordan, Division Director, R9 Elizabeth Adams, Deputy Director, R9 Amy Z impfer, Associate Director, R9 Colleen McKaughan, Associate Director, R9 Ben Machol, Chief, Clean Energy & Climate Change Section, R9 Niloufar Glosson, staffer, R9 Anita Lee, staffer, R9 Ray Saracino, staffer, R9
Amendment No. 3
                                     to
                        Schedule A to Exhibit (10)(k)
                               January 31, 2001


     The following table sets forth the name of each
current officer of Potlatch Corporation who has executed
the Indemnification Agreement filed as Exhibit (10)(k):

                                                            Date Agreement
   Name of Director                 Position                   Executed


L. Pendleton Siegel               Chairman and              December 11, 1986
                                  Chief Executive
                                  Officer

Richard L. Paulson                President and             January 1, 1993
                                  Chief Operating
                                  Officer

Phillip M. Baker                  Vice President            May 20, 1999

Ralph M. Davisson                 Vice President            April 1, 1990

Barbara M. Failing                Vice President            December 15, 2000

John E. Hanby                     Vice President            October 15, 1997

Richard K. Kelly                  Vice President            July 15, 1999

Craig H. Nelson                   Vice President            May 29, 1996

John R. Olson                     Vice President            July 30, 1999

Gerald L. Zuehlke                 Vice President,           April 10, 1995
                                  Chief Financial
                                  Officer and
                                  Treasurer

Malcolm A. Ryerse                 Corporate                 August 7, 2000
                                  Secretary




                                                           Exhibit (10)(k)(i)
#### WILLIAMS v. WRAY, Judge.

Motion No. 11392.

Supreme Court of Texas.

May 30, 1934.

William D. Wear, of Hillsboro, for relator.

CURETON, Chief Justice.

On May 26,1934, Mrs. Janie L. Williams, as reiator, filed a motion for leave to file a petition for mandamus against Hon. Walter L. Wray, Judge of the Sixty-Sixth Judicial District. The mandamus is sought for the purpose of requiring Judge Wray to proceed with the trial of cause No. 16,313, pending in his court, in whic-h the relator here is plaintiff and S. R. Raby and A. G. Raby are defendants. Said defendants are not made parties to the petition for mandamus. They are adverse claimants whose rights would be affected by a mandamus directing Judge Wray to proceed to trial. They are obviously necessary parties to this proceeding, and because they have not been made parties the motion for leave to file must be denied. 28 Texas Jurisprudence, p. 627, § 62; p. 629, § 63; Cullem v. Latimer, 4 Tex. 329; Chappell v. Rogan, 94 Tex. 492, 62 S. W. 539; Fain v. McCain (Tex. Civ. App.) 199 S. W. 889 (writ refused); O’Keefe v. Robison, Com’r, 116 Tex. 398, 292 S. W. 854; Scruggs v. McCart, 119 Tex. 464, 32 S.W.2d) 823; 38 Corpus Juris, p. 853, § 556, and cases in the notes; State v. Thompson, 118 Tenn. 571, 102 S. W. 349, 20 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1; Judge Perth Co. Ct. v. Whaley, 12 U. C. C. P., 552.

The motion for leave to file is overruled without prejudice to relator’s right to make necessary parties and again present her cause in this court.
# Official Journal L 244/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 244 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6022 September 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 244

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6022 September 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1595 of 21 September 2017 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Gorgonzola (PDO)) | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1596 of 21 September 2017 on the minimum selling price for skimmed milk powder for the 12th partial invitation to tender within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 | 8 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1597 of 21 September 2017 establishing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities covered by the applications for import rights lodged from 1 to 7 September 2017 under the tariff quotas opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2078 for poultrymeat originating in Ukraine | 9 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1595 of 21 September 2017 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Gorgonzola (PDO))

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1596 of 21 September 2017 on the minimum selling price for skimmed milk powder for the 12th partial invitation to tender within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080

8

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1597 of 21 September 2017 establishing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities covered by the applications for import rights lodged from 1 to 7 September 2017 under the tariff quotas opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2078 for poultrymeat originating in Ukraine

9

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
629 Entler Avenue, Suite 15 

Chico, CA 95928 

(530) 332-9400 

(530) 332-9417 Fax 

December 9, 2015 

To: Carol Sutkus, (916} 322-1229 

e-mail: Caroi.Sutkus@arb.ca.gov 

From: Jason Mandly, Associate Air Quality Planner 

Butte County Air Quality Management District 

Telephone: (530} 332-9400 x108 

e-mail: jmandly@bcaqmd.org 

W. James Wagoner 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

Robert McLaughlin 

Asst. Air Pollution Control Officer 

Attached please find submittal to the Butte County Air Quality Management District's State 

Implementation Plan (SIP} for PM2.5 for the following: 

Rule 300, Open Burning, Prohibitions and Exemptions (amended August 27, 2015} 

The District requests that the California Air Resources Board submit the attached SIP to the US 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA} upon review. The approved amendments to Rule 300 

addressed the rule deficiencies as identified by the EPA in order to improve the clarit y of t he 

regulation and to attain full SIP approval. 

If you have any questions, please contact me at (530} 332-9400, ext 108. 

Sincer1; y, /) I VI . (/_,. ~):. <; 

\\ 1 I \., I 

Jaso~ ndly 

Associate Air Quali