alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Year-end  Audited  Financial  Information
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      109929
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              6748195
<ALLOWANCES>                               (338000)
<INVENTORY>                                 152557
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           7170812
<PP&E>                                    12516566
<DEPRECIATION>                            (3980000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            15825641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     11882790
<BONDS>                                    3991368
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                      1560
<OTHER-SE>                                  (50077)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              15825641
<SALES>                                   34962275
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          34967200
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             33953107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1252386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (77541)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (77541)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (77541)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.01)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT



The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Pinkerton's, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pinkerton's,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 26, 1997 and December 27, 1996, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity,
and cash flows for the years ended December 26, 1997, December 27, 1996 and
December 29, 1995.  These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are
free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
consolidated financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pinkerton's Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 26, 1997 and December 27, 1996, and the results of
their operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years
ended December 26, 1997, December 27, 1996, and December 29, 1995 in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

                                  /s/ KMPG Peat Marwick LLP




Los Angeles, California
February 16, 1998
# C_2023098EN.01000201.xml

| 16.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10841 – FIRMENICH INTERNATIONAL / KONINKLIJKE DSM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 98/02)

On 22 February 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M10841. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M10841. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
##### 



PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF TOTAL DEBT TO TOTAL CAPITALIZATION
 December 31,2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Short-term
debt
    
    $
    14.3
    
    
    
    78.8
    
    
    
    50.5Current portion of long-term
debt
    
    
    2.5
    
    
    
    45.9
    
    
    
    204.6Long-term
debt
    
    
    677.7
    
    
    
    972.2
    
    
    
    1,703.9Total
debt
    
    
    694.5
    
    
    
    1,096.9
    
    
    
    1,959.0Minority interests in consolidated
subsidiaries
    
    
    915.9
    
    
    
    555.1
    
    
    
    70.2Common shareholders
equity
    
    
    5,601.6
    
    
    
    4,343.1
    
    
    
    3,063.8Total
capitalization
    
    $
    7,212.0
    
    
    
    5,995.1
    
    
    
    5,093.0Ratio of total debt to total
capitalization
    
    
    9.6
    %
    
    
    18.3
    %
    
    
    38.5
    %
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 31, 2022

No. 04-22-00258-CR

EX PARTE Luis Miguel Ramirez PEREZ

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10366CR

Honorable Roland Andrade, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his reply brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s 

reply brief is due September 26, 2022.

It is so ORDERED on this 31st day of August, 2022.

 PER CURIAM 

 ATTESTED TO: ______________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 5065 1987HeinOnline -- 52 Fed. Reg. 5066 1987
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 338 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-642, CP2024-651.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21355 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mar Ked Mineral Exploration, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended February 29, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Vladamir Fedyunin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/Vladamir
Fedyunin


Vladamir
Fedyunin


Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Financial Officer





April 8,
2008
Exhibit (10)(c)(i)



AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

POTLATCH CORPORATION

2000 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN



WHEREAS, the Board of Directors adopted and the stockholders approved the Potlatch Corporation 2000 Stock Incentive Plan
(the Plan); and



WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15 of
the Plan, the Board of Directors of Potlatch Corporation at its meeting held on December 2, 2004, amended the Plan by deleting Section 10 thereof in its entirety and substituting the notation Reserved in lieu of renumbering all
subsequent section of the Plan;



THEREFORE, based on the action
taken by the Board of Directors of Potlatch Corporation, the Plan is amended as follows:



| | 1. | Section 10 of the Plan is deleted and shall read as follows:
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------



10. RESERVED.



| | 2. | Except as amended as set forth herein, The Plan shall continue in full force and effect.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, to record the adoption of this Amendment No. 1, Potlatch Corporation has caused its authorized officer
to execute the same as of the 2ndday of December, 2004.



POTLATCH CORPORATIONBy

/s/ Barbara Failing
September 20, 2016

Exemption No. 14430A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–5238

Mr. William C. Roller

President

BR Capital dba DroneMissions.US

P.O. Box 3160

Vancouver, WA 98668-3160

Dear Mr. Roller:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter dated February 26, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of BR Capital dba DroneMissions.US (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an 

amendment to your current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 

61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations. You 

requested an amendment to change the company name from BR Capital, Inc. to BR Capital 

dba DroneMissions.US.

1

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 

 

1 The petitioner also requested to add aircraft. At this time, the FAA is unable to act on this request. When the 

FAA is ready to act, we will proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by the petitioner.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 14430

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to change the operator name.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, BR Capital dba DroneMissions.US is hereafter referred to as the 

operator. All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 14430 remain in 

effect.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

This exemption terminates on January 31, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 288 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 288

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for coverage under 
the beneficiary travel program of the Department of Veterans Affairs of 
 certain disabled veterans for travel for certain special disabilities 
                rehabilitation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2015

   Ms. Brownley of California (for herself, Mrs. Napolitano, and Mr. 
    Meeks) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for coverage under 
the beneficiary travel program of the Department of Veterans Affairs of 
 certain disabled veterans for travel for certain special disabilities 
                rehabilitation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Medical Access Act''.

SEC. 2. COVERAGE UNDER DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS BENEFICIARY 
              TRAVEL PROGRAM OF CERTAIN DISABLED VETERANS FOR TRAVEL 
              FOR CERTAIN SPECIAL DISABILITIES REHABILITATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 111(b)(1) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(G) A veteran with vision impairment, a veteran with a 
        spinal cord injury or disorder, or a veteran with double or 
        multiple amputations whose travel is in connection with care 
        provided through a special disabilities rehabilitation program 
        of the Department (including spinal cord injury center 
        programs, blind rehabilitation center programs, and prosthetics 
        rehabilitation center programs) if such care is provided--
                    ``(i) on an in-patient basis; or
                    ``(ii) during a period in which the Secretary 
                provides the veteran with temporary lodging at a 
                facility of the Department to make such care more 
                accessible to the veteran.''.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit 
to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the House of Representatives 
and the Senate a report on the beneficiary travel program under section 
111 of title 38, United States Code, including--
            (1) the cost of the program;
            (2) the number of veterans served by the program; and
            (3) any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
#### HECHT et al. v. ALTON.

No. 9048.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

April 19, 1933.

Jesse G. Foster and A. B. Crane, both of Raymondville, for appellants.

R. F. Robinson, S. L. Gill, O. N. McNeil, and Jno. W. Hill, all of Raymondville, for appellee.

MURRAY, Justice.

Eugene Alton, appellee herein, sued W. G. Hecht, appellant, upon a judgment rendered in the district court of Martin county, Minn. Appellant answered, setting up in substance the following: (1) That the Minnesota court was without jurisdiction to render ‘judgment because of false issues and want of parties; (2) that fraud was committed in the Minnesota court; (3) that the judgment was obtained on perjured testimony; (4) that there was a joint venture and a cross-action.

The trial court sustained exceptions and struck out the entire answer. In this action the trial court committed no error.

Article 4, § 1, of the Constitution of the United 'States, provides, in effect, that fuli faith and credit shall be given in each state to the judicial proceedings of every other state. Under this provision of our Federal Constitution none of the defenses set up by appellant was available to him, and the trial court properly struck out his answer. Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U. S. 230, 28 S. Ct. 641, 52 L. Ed. 1039; Bray v. Union Natl. Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 194 S. W. 1165; U. S. Const, art. 4, *§*1; Hall v. Mackay, 78 Tex. 248, 14 S. W. 615; American Express Co. v. North Fort Worth Undertaking Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 179 S. W. 908.

The appellant Tom Coleman intervened in the suit, praying “that- the court declare the judgment a nullity and that the court further declare that the claim sued upon by the plaintiff in this suit to be the property of the intervener, and that he have judgment for the proceeds of any claim should there ever be one, or should ib prove to be of any value.” The trial court properly dismissed this plea of intervention.

The judgment is affirmed.
### PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION

August 19,2014
Jared Blumenfeld Regional Administrator Temecula Band oj Luise fio Miss ion Indians Post Office Box 1477 • Temecula
. CA 92593 Telephone (951) 770-6000 Fax (951) 695

- 1778

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Re: Application for Determination ofEligibility for Clean Air Act T AS Status Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: Tribal Chairman: Mark Macarro Council Members: Catalina R Chacon Corrina R Garbani Sanchez Marc Luker Andrew Masiel. Sr. Robert "RJ." Munoa Russell "Butch" Murphy Tribal Secretary: Louise Burke Tribal Treasurer: Christina McMenamin

The Pechanga Band of Luisefio Mission Indians ("Pechanga") is a sovereign, federallyrecognized Indian Tribe eligible to request, receive and conduct federal grant programs . EPA previously determined that Pechanga is eligible for treatment in a manner similar to a state ("TAS") for Clean Air Act (CAA) sections 105, 107(d), 126 and 505(a)(2). For Pechanga to offer the best protection for the health and welfare ofits membership and its reservation lands, we are pleased to present our application for T AS for purposes of submitting and implementing a maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard under CAA Sections 110 and 175A. The application is drafted in accordance with the "Tribal Authority Rule" published at 40 CFR Part 49. Also enclosed is a Tribal Council Executive Order demonstrating legal authority under the laws ofthe Pechanga Band for this request. Please do not hesitate to call ifyou have any questions or ifyou would like additional information. We look forward to hearing from you.

Mark Macarro, Chairman Enclosures
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Max Nutrition, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nicholas Stone, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/  Nicholas Stone Nicholas Stone Title: President and Chief Financial Officer   September 19, 2007