alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 12-1

                  PECO ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                           ($000s, except ratio data)


                                                                       12 MONTHS
                                                                           ENDED
                                                                        12/31/99
                                                                     -----------

NET INCOME                                                           $  576,814

ADD BACK:

  INCOME TAXES:
  OPERATING INCOME                                                      359,160
  NON-OPERATING INCOME                                                   (5,058)
                                                                     ----------
  NET TAXES                                                             354,102

FIXED CHARGES:
  INTEREST APPLICABLE TO DEBT                                           374,518
  ANNUAL RENTALS ESTIMATE                                                 3,272
  CAPITALIZED INTEREST                                                    6,983
                                                                     ----------
  TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                                   384,773
                                                                     ----------

ADJUSTED EARNINGS INCLUDING AFUDC                                    $1,315,689
                                                                     ==========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                         3.42
                                                                     ==========

  AFUDC                                                                   3,891
                                                                     ----------

ADJUSTED EARNINGS EXCLUDING AFUDC                                    $1,311,798
                                                                     ==========

RATIO OF EARNINGS EXCLUDING AFUDC TO FIXED CHARGES                         3.41
                                                                     ==========
1 Fallon, Gail

From: Colleen Delaney <cdelaney@utah.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 1:08 PM To: Brewer, Pat; Don_Shepherd@nps.gov Cc: Dave Mcneill; Fallon, Gail; mberger@utah.gov Subject: Draft Revisions to Utah's Regional Haze SIP Attachments: ITEM_VIII_SIP_XX.D.6_RegHaze.pdf; ITEM_IX_R307-110- 17and110-28.pdf; ITEM_XIb_ProgressRrt_RegHz.pdf

The Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) has prepared a draft revision to the Utah Regional Haze SIP to address the EPA’s December 14, 2012 disapproval of the BART determinations for NOx and PM for four EGUs in Southern Utah. Utah’s Air Quality Board is schedul ed to propose these revisions for public comment at the October 1, 2014 Board meeting. DAQ has also prepar ed a 5-Year Progress Report for Utah’s RH SIP as required by 40 CFR 51.309(d)(10). The 5-Year Progr ess Report does not require formal rulemaking, but will follow the public comment process required for a SI P revision.

Utah’s RH SIP was developed under the provisions of section 309 and therefore a formal FLM consultatio n period is not required. However, we want to accomp lish the same review informally. We will be sendin g a letter to NPS in the near future requesting your re view. In the meantime, here are the drafts electro nically.

The comment period for the proposed SIP revisions a nd the 5-year Progress Report will be open from November 1, 2014, through December 1, 2014. A hear ing on the proposed revisions to the RH SIP and the 5- Year Progress report has been scheduled for Tuesday , December 1, 2014, from 1:00 PM to 2:00 PM at 195 N 1950 W, Salt Lake City, Utah, in the Four Corners C onference Room (4 th Floor). The Air Quality Board is expected to consider the RH SIP for final adoption at their regularly scheduled meeting on January 7, 2015.

Please let me know if you have any questions or if you need a copy of any of the supporting informatio n. We are still compiling the technical support document for this SIP revision and plan to post all of the d ocuments online prior to the start of the public comment per iod.

Colleen Delaney Utah Division of Air Quality (801) 536-4248 cdelaney@utah.gov
# Official Journal L 264/11 A

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 264 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4711 August 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 264

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4711 August 2004

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1430/2004 of 10 August 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1431/2004 of 10 August 2004 opening an invitation to tender for the allocation of A3 export licences for fruit and vegetables (tomatoes, oranges, table grapes and apples) | 3 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1432/2004 of 10 August 2004 amending Regulations (EC) No 2366/98 laying down detailed rules for the application of the system of production aid for olive oil for the 1998/99 to 2003/04 marketing years and (EC) No 2768/98 on the aid scheme for the private storage of olive oil | 6 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1433/2004 of 10 August 2004 on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal | 9 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1434/2004 of 10 August 2004 determining the world market price for unginned cotton | 10 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1430/2004 of 10 August 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1431/2004 of 10 August 2004 opening an invitation to tender for the allocation of A3 export licences for fruit and vegetables (tomatoes, oranges, table grapes and apples)

3

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1432/2004 of 10 August 2004 amending Regulations (EC) No 2366/98 laying down detailed rules for the application of the system of production aid for olive oil for the 1998/99 to 2003/04 marketing years and (EC) No 2768/98 on the aid scheme for the private storage of olive oil

6

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1433/2004 of 10 August 2004 on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal

9

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1434/2004 of 10 August 2004 determining the world market price for unginned cotton

10

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3001 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3001

   To authorize certain long-term contracts for Federal purchases of 
                                energy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2015

Mr. Welch (for himself, Mr. Gibson, and Mr. Cartwright) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government 
 Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize certain long-term contracts for Federal purchases of 
                                energy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Renewable Energy Certainty Act''.

SEC. 2. CONTRACTS FOR FEDERAL PURCHASES OF ENERGY.

    (a) In General.--Part 3 of title V of the National Energy 
Conservation Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 8251 et seq.) is amended by adding 
at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 554. LONG-TERM CONTRACTS FOR ENERGY.

    ``(a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 501(b)(1)(B) of title 
40, United States Code, a Federal agency may enter into a contract for 
the acquisition of renewable energy or energy from cogeneration 
facilities covering a period of not more than 30 years.
    ``(b) Standardized Energy Purchase Agreement.--Not later than 90 
days after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary, 
through the Federal Energy Management Program, shall publish a 
standardized energy purchase agreement, setting forth commercial terms 
and conditions, that Federal agencies may use to acquire renewable 
energy or energy from cogeneration facilities.
    ``(c) Technical Assistance.--The Secretary shall provide technical 
assistance to assist Federal agencies in implementing this section.''.
    (b) Table of Contents Amendment.--The table of contents for such 
Act is amended by adding at the end of the items relating to such part 
3 the following new item:

``Sec. 554. Long-term contracts for energy.''.
                                 <all>
```
June 6, 2012

Aloha 

### Ley Associate Director Department

### ofTransportation Small Community Program, W86-310 1200 NewJerseyAve, SE Washington, DC 20590 DearAssociate Director Ley: 

### '!: 

## I? l '

.. _ FfOntler AlrttMS, Inc. FrontJer CenterOne 1001 Tower Road Denver, 

### co 80249 p 720.374.4200 F 720.374.4375

Frontier Airlines Is pleased 

### to support the application 

### of Lehigh Valley International Airport (ABE) fora SCASDG aimed 

### atattractingnew lowfare nonstop service to Denver. While Frontier can provide no assurances regarding future service 

### at lehigh Valley, the availability 

### of SCASDG funds will definitely factor positively In our evaluation 

### ofthe market. This 

### Is important given the challenges facing 

### the U.S. domestic airline industry resulting from 

### costs associated with new market development, the perpetual uncertainty surrounding oil prices and 

### the risk assoclated with 

### flyinga route ofover 1,500 miles. For these reasons, Frontier Airlines supports 

### the SCASDG application of lehigh Valley International Airport (ABE) and 

### asks 

### that you 

### give 

### lt favorable consideration. Please feel free 

### to contact me shouldyou have any questions. 

### Stncerety,

G gAretakis Vice President, Network and Revenue FrontierAirlines 

# A D
#### WILKINS v. STATE.

No. 17857.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 22, 1936.

Rehearing Denied March 4, 1936.

J. B. Petty, of Austin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for robbery; punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

We are met at the threshold of the consideration of this case with the fact that the appeal bond is not signed by two sureties as required by law. The bond appears to be signed by one surety, and by another who signs by attorney in fact. This court held in Ex parte Albert Meadows, 87 S.W. (2d) 254, decided October 31, 1935, that a surety to a bond in a case of this kind could not sign .by an attorney in fact. The appeal bond being defective, this court has no jurisdiction.

The appeal *will*be dismissed.
Date 10/29/10 Page of 

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Summary Page 

Chemical ID: P-11-0029 Reviewer: Bevington/SS 

Endpoints-Assessed Table 

Reasons for not assessing releases 

Endpoints/Assessment 

Cycles1

Releases 

Assessed 

in 

NCEM2? 

No XB 

Testing 

Required 

No 

Hazard 

Concern 

No 

Releases 

Release 

Below 

Acute 

Threshold5

Release 

Below 

Chronic 

Threshold5

Other 

Ingestion 

 Surface water No NA X NA NA 

 Ground water (landfill) No NA X NA 

 Consumer Use: DtD2 No NA NA NA NA No consumer use 

Inhalation 

 Air: incineration (stack) No NA X X 

 Air: fugitive No NA X 

 Consumer Use: CEM3 No NA NA NA NA No consumer use 

Dermal 

 Consumer Use: CEM No NA NA NA NA No consumer use 

Eco 

 Surface water: ADR 

conc and/or PDM4

No NA X NA NA 

 Consumer Use: DtD No NA NA NA NA No consumer use 1

Assessment cycles are endpoint concentrations and dose calculations within the NCEM2 model. 2

Down-the-Drain 

3

Consumer Exposure Model 

4

Probabilistic Dilution Model 

5

The threshold values for assessing endpoints are 1 mg/day for acute doses and 1 mg/year for chronic doses. 

EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation of an exposure 

assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch=s (EAB) Initial Review Exposure Report (this report). 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 1
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 07-1588

ALEXANDRE ARONOV,

Plaintiff, Appellee,

v.

JANET NAPOLITANO, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellants.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on April 13, 2009 is

amended as follows:

On p. 35, line 13 of footnote 3: Replace "parties" with

"parties'".
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as 

Koenig v. Dungey, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-4538.] 

NOTICE 

This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in 

an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested 

to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 

65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or 

other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be 

made before the opinion is published. 

SLIP OPINION NO. 2015-OHIO-4538

KOENIG ET AL., APPELLEES, v. DUNGEY, DIR., ET AL., APPELLANTS. 

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it 

may be cited as Koenig v. Dungey, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-4538.] 

Medicaid—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause remanded on the 

authority of Estate of Atkinson v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs. 

(No. 2015-0034—Submitted September 2, 2015—Decided November 4, 2015.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-140111, 

2014-Ohio-4646. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is 

remanded to the trial court for further proceedings in light of Estate of Atkinson v. 

Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs., Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-3397. 

 O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, KENNEDY, and FRENCH, JJ., 

concur. 

 LANZINGER and O’NEILL, JJ., dissent. 

_________________ 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2

 Beckman Weil Shepardson, L.L.C., Janet E. Pequet, and Ashley Shannon 

Burke, for appellees. 

 Mike DeWine, Attorney General, Eric E. Murphy, State Solicitor, Michael 

J. Hendershot, Chief Deputy Solicitor, Stephen P. Carney, Deputy Solicitor, and 

Rebecca L. Thomas and Jeffery Jarosch, Assistant Attorneys General, for 

appellants. 

_________________
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**          I, John C. Francis, the Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of ConsolidationServices, Inc. certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidation Services, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) * for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) *:  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
-18-

 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: August 14, 2007 CONSOLIDATION SERVICES, INC.
#### DRISCOLL v. NOLAN et al.

Motion No. 9230; No. 8786.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

Sept. 27, 1939.

For former opinion, see 130 S.W.2d 400.

A. J. Lewis and Henderson, Kidd & Henderson, all of Cameron, for appellant.

*1026W. A. Morrison and Wallace & Wallace, all of Cameron, for appellees.

BAUGH, Justice.

Appellees, under leave granted by the court, have filed a second motion for rehearing, accompanied by a remittitur of $450 of the amount adjudged to them by the trial court, being the amount of damages to crops on the land as found by the jury, and pray that as remitted the judgment of the trial court be reformed and affirmed as to the remainder of the damages found by the jury. We have concluded that said motion should be granted. In our original opinion, 130 S.W.2d 400, we found no error as to the damages found to have been sustained to the lands of appellees by reason of the torts complained of; and reversed the judgment because of the crop damage found by the jury, on the ground that such finding was contrary to the overwhelming preponderance of the evidence. In view of the remittitur filed, no reason appears for remanding the cause for another trial. Our former judgment herein remanding the cause for another trial is therefore set aside, the judgment of the trial court is reformed so as to limit the recovery of the plaintiffs below against the defendant below, appellant here, to the sum of $660, with 6% interest thereon from the date of the judgment; and as so reformed, the trial court's judgment is affirmed.

Motion granted. Judgment of trial court reformed and affirmed.
|Exhibit 99.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICERIN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



In
connection with the quarterly report of New Century Equity Holdings Corp. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Parris H. Holmes, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge that:
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(1) |  | The
Form 10-Q report for the three months ended March 31, 2003, filed with the
          Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24, 2003, fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
          and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Form 10-Q report for the three months ended           March
31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial           condition and
results of operations of New Century Equity Holdings Corp.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By: /s/ PARRIS
      H. HOLMES, JR. 
            
      Parris H. Holmes, Jr. 
      Chairman of the Board of Directors
      Chief Executive Officer |  | Date: April 24, 2003 | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | 

|
|