alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection
with the Annual Report of Rewards Network Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher J.
Locke, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 15, 2006



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Christopher J. Locke                         
|Christopher J. Locke                             
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal L 130/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.130.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 130 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5328 May 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.130.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 130

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5328 May 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 77 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of parking lamps for power-driven vehicles | 1 |
| | * | Regulation No 90 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of replacement brake lining assemblies and drum brake linings for power-driven vehicles and their trailers | 19 |
| | * | Regulation No 94 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the protection of the occupants in the event of a frontal collision | 50 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 77 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of parking lamps for power-driven vehicles

1

*

Regulation No 90 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of replacement brake lining assemblies and drum brake linings for power-driven vehicles and their trailers

19

*

Regulation No 94 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the protection of the occupants in the event of a frontal collision

50

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
| Exhibit 32.0 |
|--------------|

| 1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by this Report. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Thomas F. Gibney                              |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Thomas F. Gibney                                  |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer             |
|   |   | November 15, 2010                                 |
|   |   |                                              |
|   |   |                                              |
|   |   |                                              |
|   |   |                                              |
|   | By:    | /s/ Stephen W. Dederick                           |
|   |   | Stephen W. Dederick                               |
|   |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | November 15, 2010                                 |
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, James R. Reske, of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (“First Commonwealth”), certify that the Quarterly Report of First Commonwealth on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2022, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of First Commonwealth at the end of such period and the results of operations of First Commonwealth for such period.


DATED:  May 9, 2022/s/ James R. ReskeJames R. ReskeExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Mary M. Rawls v. Jeffrey Clark Rawls

Appellate case number: 01-13-00568-CV

Trial court case number: 2007-61678

Trial court: 246th District Court of Harris County

On February 24, 2014, the parties filed a Joint Motion for Disposition of Appeal by 

Settlement. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure do not permit an appellate court to order a new 

trial on the agreement of the parties absent reversible error, or to vacate a trial court’s judgment 

absent reversible error or a settlement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1 & cmt.

The motion is DENIED, without prejudice to refiling to describe, with citation to 

authorities, the basis for the parties’ contention that the trial court committed reversible error in 

granting summary judgment. If appellee chooses instead to file his brief, the Court EXTENDS

the deadline for filing same to March 28, 2014.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 27, 2014
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2013-0490

Docket Number

2008-SW-004-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

Bell Alert Service Bulletin No. 407-05-67, dated June 8, 2005.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
#### WILCOXSON v. STATE.

No. 19809.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 1, 1938.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 19, 1938.

Wallace Hughston, of McKinney, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*1055GRAVES, Judge.

The offense is selling whisky in a dry area; punishment, a fine of $100.00.

The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception. The complaint and information seem to be in proper form. All matters of procedure appearing regular, the judgment will be affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

We have re-examined the record in the light of the appellant’s motion for rehe'aring and have reached the conclusion that the proper disposition of the appeal was made in the original opinion.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3059 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3059

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2015

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4500 SE 28th Street, Del City, Oklahoma, as the James Robert Kalsu 
                         Post Office Building.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JAMES ROBERT KALSU POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4500 SE 28th Street, Del City, Oklahoma, shall be known and 
designated as the ``James Robert Kalsu Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James 
Robert Kalsu Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2022473EN.01001401.xml

| 13.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 473/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 473/14

---

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/2432, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2430 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2022/C 473/04)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/2432 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2430 (4)concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons, entities and bodies should be included on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for the designation of those persons, entities and bodies appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons, entities and bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address before 6 January 2023.

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 318 I, 12.12.2022, p. 31.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(4)  OJ L 318 I, 12.12.2022, p. 20.

---
# Official Journal C 191A/9 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 191A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 589 June 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 191A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 589 June 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 191A/01 | Publication of a vacancy for the Executive Director of the Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (Temporary Agent grade AD14) — COM/2015/20007 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2015/C 191A/01

Publication of a vacancy for the Executive Director of the Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (Temporary Agent grade AD14) — COM/2015/20007

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2023276EN.01000801.xml

| 4.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/8

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107772

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 276/07)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 26.6.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107772 |
| Member State | Hungary |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCTF: Hungarian Development Bank agricultural, fishing and food industry working capital loan scheme in the form of subsidized loans |
| Legal basis | (a) | Section 2 and Section 3 of Act XX of 2001 on the Hungarian Development Bank (Magyar Fejlesztési Bank, ‘MFB’); (b) The MFB Agricultural and Food Industry Working Capital Loan Scheme Term Sheet. |

Date of adoption of the decision

26.6.2023

Aid number

SA.107772

Member State

Hungary

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCTF: Hungarian Development Bank agricultural, fishing and food industry working capital loan scheme in the form of subsidized loans

Legal basis

(a)

Section 2 and Section 3 of Act XX of 2001 on the Hungarian Development Bank (Magyar Fejlesztési Bank, ‘MFB’); (b) The MFB Agricultural and Food Industry Working Capital Loan Scheme Term Sheet.

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Soft loan

Budget

Overall budget: 29 000 000 000 HUF

Annual budget: 29 000 000 000 HUF

Intensity

Duration

27.6.2023 — 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

| The Hungarian Development Bank |
| --- |
| 1051 Budapest, Nádor u. 31. |

The Hungarian Development Bank

1051 Budapest, Nádor u. 31.

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA

---
# C_2022154EN.01000101.xml

| 8.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10602 – SWISS LIFE INTERNATIONAL HOLDING / ELIPS LIFE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 154/01)

On 1 April 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10602. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10602. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Opinion issued April 30, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 15
- 00039
- CR

——————————— THOMAS NOLAN WHITE , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 75th District Court Liberty County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. CR30923

MEMORANDUM OPINION A jury found a ppellant, Thomas Nolan White , guilty of the state

- jail felony offense of theft and sentenced him to two years’ imprisonment. See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN . §§ 12.35(a), 31.03(a), (e)(4)(D) (West Supp. 2014). Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal.2

Appellant’ s appointed counsel on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw, along with a brief stating that the recor d presents no reversible error and the appeal is without merit and is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967)

. Counsel’s brief meets the Anders requirements by pre senting a professional

eva luation of the record and supplying us with references to the record and legal authority

. 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400 ; see also High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978) . Counsel indicates that he has thoroughly reviewed the record and is unable to advance any grounds of error that warrant reversal. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; Mitchell v. State , 193 S.W.3d 153, 155 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.). Appellant filed a response, presenting his own statement of facts and arguing, among other things, that his counsel failed to adequately represent him. We have independently reviewed the entire record in this appeal, and we conclude that no reversible error exists in the record , there are no arguable grounds for review, and the appeal is frivolous

. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400 (e mphasizing that reviewing court

— and not counsel

— determines, after full examination of proceedings, whet her appeal is wholly frivolous); Garner v. State , 300 S.W.3d 763, 767 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (reviewing court must determine whether arguable grounds for review exist); Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824,3

826

– 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) ( same); Mitchell , 193 S.W.3d at 155 (reviewing court determines whether argua ble grounds exist by reviewing entire record)

. We note that a n appellant may challenge a holding that there are no arguable grounds for appeal by filing a petition for discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Bledsoe , 178 S.W.3d at 827 & n. 6. We affirm the judgment of the trial court and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. 1 Attorney Steven Greene must immediately send appellant the required notice and file a copy of the notice with the Clerk of this Court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 6.5(c). PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b).

1 Appointed counsel still has a duty to inform appellant of the result of this appeal and that he may, on his own, pursue discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Ex Parte Wilson , 956 S.W.2d 25, 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997)

.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICTOR M. SAMANIEGO; BERTHA

ALICIA SAMANIEGO,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v.

LAW OFFICES OF LES ZIEVE ET. AL.; et

al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 20

- 56354

D.C. No. 3:19

- cv

- 01582

- TWR

BGS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Todd W. Robinson , District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Victor M. Samaniego and Bertha Alicia Samaniego appeal pro s e from the

district court’s judgment dismissing their action alleging federal and state law

claims arising from the foreclosure of their home . We have jurisdiction under 28

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 56354

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under the Rooker

- Feldman

doctrine

. Noel v. Hall , 341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003)

. We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the Samaniegos’ action because the

action constitute s a forbidden “de facto appeal” of a prior state court judgment and

raises claims that are “inextricably intertwined” with that judgment. Id. at 1163

- 65

(discussing proper application of the Rooker

- Feldman doctrine); see also Henrichs

v. Valley View Dev. , 474 F.3d 609, 616 (9th Cir. 2007) ( Rooker

- Feldman barred

plaintiff’s claim because the relief sought “would require the district court to

determine that the state co urt’s decision was wrong and thus void”).

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit
      23.1**






**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**






We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (File No. 2-85849, 333-118789 and 333-187821) of Nature Vision, Inc. of
      our
      report dated March 30, 2007, which appears on page F-1 of this annual report
      on
      Form 10-K(SB) for the year ended December 31, 2006.






/s/
      VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP






Minneapolis,
      Minnesota


March
      30,
      2007