alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)    | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                |

| Date: May 16, 2011                                                |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |
|                                                              |
| /s/Bob Armstrong                                                  |
| Bob ArmstrongChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |
Page 48 of 49


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 (as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
National Presto Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
SEC or its Staff upon request.



Date: March 10, 2004                            /s/ M.J. Cohen
                                                -------------------------------
                                                M. J. Cohen,
                                                Chief Executive Officer
Page 50 of 51

# EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of National Presto Industries, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its Staff upon request.

|Date:   March 10, 2005 |                                    | /s/   M.J. Cohen | 
|---------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ---------------- | 
|                       |                                   
|                       | M. J. CohenChief Executive Officer |                 

---
EPA Presentation on Changes to UST Regulations at TRIBAL SUMMIT TULSA, OK on March 29, 2012

EPA staff gave a short presentation on the proposed changes to the UST regulations and answered questions from the tribes.

**Attendance** Heather Mann US EPA Region 6 Roger Hancock US EPA Region 6 Pinu’u Stout ENIPC/OETA Genevieve McGeisey ENIPC/OETA Mitchell Fipps C itizen P otawatomi N ation Dino Chavarria Santa Clara Pueblo Cheryl Stafford Ottawa Tribe Tabitha King Ottawa Tribe Robert Largent IT EC David Hayes IT EC Dwain Camp Tonkawa Tribe of OK Phillip Pennington Chickasaw Judy Ausmus Muscogee (Creek) Nation Jerry Kelley Muscogee (Creek) Nation Anthony Tiger Cherokee Nation Kasey Johnson Cherokee Nation Entertainment Dixie Shaw Pawnee Nation Brian Stillwell Comanche Nation Antonio Garza Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas Chuck Tillman Choctaw Nation
|EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zones, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Firoz H. Lalji, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 12, 2004
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /S/   FIROZ H LALJI                 
| |  | ------------------------------------
| |  | Firoz H. Lalji                      
| |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

|
|
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.1  


 
  SEALED AIR CORPORATION
  Amendment to Contingent Stock Plan
  August 4, 2004    
    


        Section 20 of the Contingent Stock Plan of Sealed Air Corporation (the "Corporation") is amended to read in its entirety as follows: 




        Section 20.    Tax Withholding.    Each Purchase Agreement incident to the Plan shall make appropriate
provisions for the withholding of any federal, state or local taxes and any other charges that may be required by law to be withheld by reason of an Award, the issuance of Common Stock pursuant to the
Plan or the reacquisition of such Common Stock by the Corporation. The Corporation may cause any tax withholding obligation or other charges described in the preceding sentence to be satisfied by the
Corporation withholding from the shares of Common Stock covered by an Award a number of shares (rounded up to the nearest whole share) with an aggregate fair market value on the date that such
withholding obligation arises equal to the aggregate amount of such taxes and other charges. Regardless of any other provision of the Plan, the Corporation may refuse to issue or to deliver to the
Employee certificates or a book entry statement representing shares covered by an Award until the Employee to whom the Award was made complies with any withholding obligation. 

















QuickLinks


SEALED AIR CORPORATION Amendment to Contingent Stock Plan August 4, 2004
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7636** 

ALONZO JAQUA REID , Petitioner

– Appellant ,

v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director, D.O.C. , Respondent

– Appellee , and BRYAN WATSON, Warden , Respondent

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. James R. Spencer , District Judge. ( 3:12

- cv - 00556

- JRS )

Submitted : January 23, 2014 Decided: January 28, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Alonzo Jaqua Reid, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Beatty Martin, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Ap pellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Alonzo Jaqua Reid seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitu tional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on t he merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitut ional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Reid has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument bec ause the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D
|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |  |
| INDIANA                                        | 35-1544218 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

----

----

----

|     |                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.1 | Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and Merger between First Merchants Corporation and Independent Alliance Banks, Inc., dated February 17, 2017 |

|      |                                                                                                                                           |
|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 10.1 | Voting Agreement, dated February 17, 2017, among First Merchants Corporation and certain shareholders of Independent Alliance Banks, Inc. |

|      |                                        |
|------|----------------------------------------|
| 99.1 | Press Release, dated February 17, 2017 |

|      |                                                 |
|------|-------------------------------------------------|
| 99.2 | Conference Call Presentation, February 17, 2017 |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7734

RISHARD LEWIS GETER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

OFFICER TAHARRA, Jailer, Spartanburg County Detention 

Center,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

LARRY POWERS, Warden, Spartanburg County Detention Center; 

TERESA SPELLER, Captain, Spartanburg County Detention 

Center,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. J. Michelle Childs, District 

Judge. (8:07-cv-03849-JMC)

Submitted: April 19, 2011 Decided: May 3, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Rishard Lewis Geter, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Todd Darwin, 

HOLCOMBE, BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, PA, Spartanburg, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Rishard Lewis Geter appeals a jury verdict in his 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action against Officer Taharra of the 

Spartanburg County Detention Center. On appeal, Geter 

challenges several rulings of the district court and alleges the 

ineffectiveness of the attorney appointed to assist him. We 

affirm.

We review evidentiary rulings by the district court 

for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Basham, 561 F.3d 

302, 325 (4th Cir. 2009). An abuse of discretion occurs when 

“the district court judge acted arbitrarily or irrationally in 

admitting [or excluding] evidence.” Id. at 326 (internal 

quotation marks omitted). Having reviewed the informal briefs 

of the parties and the record before us, we perceive no such 

abuse of discretion in the challenged rulings of the district 

court.

Geter also challenges the effectiveness of counsel. 

However, there is no right to appointment of counsel in a civil 

case, and allegations of appointed counsel’s ineffectiveness are 

not sufficient to raise a valid claim for relief on appeal. See

Glick v. Henderson, 855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir. 1988); 

Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 

(5th Cir. 1986). Therefore, these claims entitle Geter to no 

relief.
4

Geter also alleges that he has new evidence that 

entitles him to a new trial. However, the material submitted to 

the court is not new, and therefore warrants no retrial. United 

States v. Custis, 988 F.2d 1355, 1359 (4th Cir. 1993) (“The 

standard for granting a new trial is well established in this 

circuit: [first,] the evidence must be, in fact, newly 

discovered, i.e., discovered since the trial.”).

Geter’s claims entitle him to no relief, and we 

therefore affirm the judgment of the district court imposed on 

the jury verdict. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of SCPIE Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                          
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: August 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert B. Tschudy                    
|                      |  |  |  | Robert B. Tschudy Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Applied Biosystems Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Tony L. White, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Tony L. White      
|Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 27, 2008
Item 2.   PROPERTIES (Continued)

     The proceeds of any disposition are retained by N&W and constitute an
indebtedness of N&W to Registrant.  Because of the unlimited settlement date
for non-cash items, such transactions and balances have not been reported in
the financial statements since 1982. If N&W should ever terminate the lease,
all properties covered by the lease would be returned to Registrant, together
with sufficient cash and other assets to permit operation of the railroad for
one year.

Item 3.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     The Company is a defendant in a personal injury suit seeking unspecified
damages.  Although the eventual outcome of this matter cannot be determined,
management is of the opinion the claim is without merit and intends to
vigorously defend the Company.

Item 4.   SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     No matters were submitted during the fourth quarter to a vote of security
holders.

                               PART II

Item 5.   MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND
           RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS

     Registrant's shares are listed for trading on the American Stock Exchange.
At March 2, 1999 there were approximately 1,163 holders of record of
registrant's shares of beneficial interest.
[CAPTION]
Stock Market and Dividend information per share of beneficial interest.

                                       1998 Quarters Ended
                                 
                                3/31         6/30        9/30         12/31 
 <TABLE>                             
 Sales price of traded shares
   <S>                        <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>
   High . . .                 $ 7-5/8     $  7-1/2    $  7-3/4     $    8-1/8
   Low. . . .                   7-1/4        7-1/8       7-1/8          7-5/8
 Dividends paid.                  .13          .14         .14            .14


                                       1997 Quarters Ended

                                3/31         6/30        9/30         12/31 

 Sales price of traded shares
   High . . .                 $ 7-5/8    $   7-3/8     $  7-1/2     $ 7-11/16
   Low. . . .                       7      6-15/16        7-1/8             7
 Dividends paid.                  .13          .14          .13           .14 
</TABLE>
Order filed October 29, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00738

- CV

____________ IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF RICHARD CARTER AND BRENDA LACKEY

On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texa s Trial Cou rt Cause No. 2017

- 37440



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed September 23, 2019. To date, the filing fee of $20 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant is excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed.
See Tex. R. App. P

. 5

. Therefore, the court issues the following order.
Appellant is ordered to pay th e filing fee in the amount of $20 5.00 to the

c lerk of this court on or before November 13, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 . If appell ant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal
will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1
 
 THE HOUSTON EXPLORATION COMPANY  News Release
 Houston Exploration Announces Receipt of Requisite Consents
with Respect to Its Tender Offer and Consent Solicitation
for Its 7% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2013




---



##### 





Exhibit 99.1










About
The Houston Exploration Company




Additional
Information and Where to Find It









---



##### 



Exhibit 99.1
   Forward-looking
Statements
   Contact:
    
    The Houston Exploration CompanyMelissa R. Aurelio713-830-6887maurelio@houstonexp.com
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, each of the undersigned, Lawrence J. LeBon, III, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John LeBlanc, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Lawrence J. LeBon, III                       
|                      |  |     |  | Lawrence J. LeBon, III                           
|                      |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                      |  |    
|Date: August 12, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ John LeBlanc                                 
|                      |  |     |  | John LeBlanc                                     
|                      |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been
provided to Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.