alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|---------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tecton Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

Dated: December 17, 2007/s/Norman MeierNorman Meier President, Chief Executive Officer

---
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of K-Care Nutritional
Products Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: September 14, 2007 | /s/ Eva Dudas                                             
|------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                          | Eva Dudas                                                 
|                          | President, Chief Executive Officer,                       
|                          | Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting
      Office

---
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Scott
C. Grout, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of RadiSys Corporation for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 29, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Scott C. Grout     
|Scott C. Grout         
|Chief Executive Officer
September 6, 2011 

MEMORANDUM 

From: William H. Maxwell 

EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01) 

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234 

Subject: Meeting with Cogentrix Energy, LLC 

Attendees: 

Robert J. Wayland, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD 

Bill Maxwell, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD 

Nick Hutson, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD 

Paul Versace, EPA/OGC (by phone) 

C. Richard Neff, Cogentrix Energy 

Cheryl G. Sawyer, Cogentrix Energy 

Jay Hofman, Trinity Consultants 

Tony Jabon, Trinity Consultants 

Doris McLeod, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (by phone) 

Discussion: 

A general discussion was held of the comments submitted by Cogentrix Energy on the proposed 

Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234-17845) along with supplemental 

materials provided (EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234-19631) by Cogentrix Energy related to 

Cogentrix-Hopewell (aka Cogentrix James River, James River Cogeneration Company; ORIS 

10377) and Cogentrix-Portsmouth (aka Cogentrix-Virginia Leasing Corporation; ORIS 10071).
#### GOLMAN et al. v. JOHNSON.

No. 3399.

*Court*of Civil Appeals of *Texas.*El Paso.

Sept. 24, 1936.

Homer Jack Fisher and Turner, Rodgers & Winn, all of Dallas, for plaintiffs in error.

HIGGINS, Justice.

Johnson sued C. P. Haupt for debt. Attachment issued and was levied upon chattels, Haupt replevied with plaintiffs in error, Golman and Donosky, as sureties upon his bond. Judgment was rendered against Haupt for $216.33 and against the sureties for $150, the value of the chat*335tels as appraised by the officer. The sureties prosecute this writ of error.

The bond was not conditioned as required by article 292, R.S. It was a forthcoming bond and more onerous than the statute requires. It was therefore error to summarily render judgment against the sureties for the appraised value of the property. Mariany v. Lemaire (Tex.Civ.App.) 83 S.W. 215; Norvell-Shapleigh Hardware Company v. Hall Novelty & Machine Works (Tex.Civ.App.) 91 S.W. 1092; Elrod Bros. & Phillips v. Rice (Tex.Civ.App.) 99 S.W. 733.

Reversed, and judgment rendered dismissing as to the plaintiffs in error without prejudice to the right of Johnson to proceed against them upon the bond as a common-law obligation.

Reversed and rendered.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of

- )

)

Alutiiq Manufacturing Contractors, LLC ) ASBCA Nos. 63099, 63100

)

Under Contract No. W9128A

- 16

- C

- 0017 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Mark G. Jackson, Esq.

Stowell B. Holcomb, Esq.

Jackson Holcomb LLP

Seattle, WA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Jonathan A. Swanson, Esq.

Nathan Kanale Sadowski, Esq.

Sarah M. Urchek, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys

U.S. Army Engineer District, Honolulu

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal s are dismissed with prejudice.

Dated : April 2 5 , 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 63099, 63100

, Appeals of Alutiiq

Manufacturing Contractors, LLC , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: April 25, 2022 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
* The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-1528

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * Marcus Garcia Bland, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 19, 2002 Filed: July 26, 2002

___________ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. After Marcus Garcia Bland was charged with possessing with intent to distribute in excess of 50 grams of a mixture containing cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A), Bland moved to suppress evidence seized from his residence. The district court * denied the motion, Bland pleaded guilty, and the district court sentenced him to 210 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release.-2- On appeal, Bland's counsel filed a brief and moved to withdraw under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing the district court improperly denied the motion to suppress. Bland has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. An appeal of the denied motion to suppress is foreclosed by Bland's unconditional guilty plea. SeeUnited States v. Jennings , 12 F.3d 836, 839 (8th Cir. 1994). Also, having independently reviewed the record, we find no nonfrivolous issues. Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988). Accordingly, we affirm the district court and grant counsel's motion to withdraw. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Xtreme Green Products Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sanford Leavitt, Chief Executive Officer, and Neil Roth, Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1) This
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Sanford LeavittSanford
      LeavittChief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      June 3, 2010




/s/ Neil RothNeil
      RothChief
      Financial OfficerDate:
      June 3, 2010
#### WOOD v. STATE.

No. 13602.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 14, 1931.

Baker & Baker, of Coleman, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, J.

The offense is driving an automobile on a public road while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50 and confinement in jail for ten days.

The conviction is for a felony. No sentence appears in the record. In the absence of a sentence, this court is without jurisdiction upon appeal. Nicholson v. State, Í10 Tex. Cr. R. 112, 7 S.W.(2d) 1075.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<CIK>                         0001013564
<NAME>                        Farm Family Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           269,825
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          8,471
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            8,949
<EQUITIES>                                     4,841
<MORTGAGE>                                     728
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 292,495
<CASH>                                         5,523
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             17,513
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         13,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 394,382
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                168,411
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            72,650
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 21,892
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       53
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,732
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   394,382
<PREMIUMS>                                     87,744
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            9,518
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             342
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 483
<BENEFITS>                                     66,127
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    23,591
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                8,289
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,556
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,733
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,733
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.08
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 127,568
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            67,946
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (1,817)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             23,964
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               33,238
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                136,495
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        


</TABLE>
#### City of Struthers, Appellee, *v.*Martin, Appellant. City of Struthers, Appellee, *v.*Rummell, Appellant. City of Struthers, Appellee, *v.*Willard, Appellant.

(Nos. 28974, 28975 and 2876

Decided February 4, 1942.)

*Mr. T. T. Macejko,*for appellee.

*Mr. E. F. Mooneyham,*for appellants.

It is ordered and adjudged that these appeals as of right be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeals dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00246-CV

Anselma RODRIGUEZ, Norma Rodriguez, Amadora R. Mariscal, 

Homero Rodriguez, and Elisa R. Alaniz,

Appellants

v.

Arturo RODRIGUEZ, Santos R. Olmeda, Pablo Rodriguez, Jr., David Rodriguez, Elva R. 

Smith, Children of Alberto Rodriguez (deceased), Alberto Rodriguez, Jr., 

Nadia Rodriguez, and Manuel Rodriguez,

Appellees

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-09-538

Honorable Baldemar Garza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellees recover their costs of this appeal from appellants. 

SIGNED May 6, 2020.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
From: "Moore, Chris N." <Chris.Moore@alcoa.com>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Palazzolo, Michael A." <Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com>

Date: 01/14/2011 10:12 AM

Subject: Alcoa Inc. - Tennessee Operations Primary MACT Data Request

Rochelle -

Good morning! Per your request via Mike Palazzolo, here are the revised

files for Alcoa Inc. - Tennessee Operations. Please let me know if you

or others have questions regarding the files. I will be glad to help

with any additional revisions or provide other information as necessary.

Thanks!

Chris

Chris Moore

Alcoa Inc. - Tennessee Operations

(865) 977-2403

<<ReleasePoint_NEI10933_Jan 2011.xls>> <<CategoryHAPs_NEI10933_Jan

2011.xls>> <<Alcoa South Plant_Dec 2010.kmz>>
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly
report of Triple A Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.   Dated:  May 15, 2008  /s/ P. Morgan
McCune  Name: P. Morgan
McCune Title:  Chief Executive
Officer    Dated:  May 15, 2008  /s/ P. Morgan
McCune  Name: P. Morgan
McCune Title:  Chief Financial
Officer
# C_2023129EN.01000101.xml

| 13.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11005 – RENAULT / MINTH / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 129/01)

On 6 March 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11005. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11005. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# Official Journal L 345/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 345 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5830 December 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 345

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5830 December 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2015/2448 of 14 December 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 1388/2013 opening and providing for the management of autonomous tariff quotas of the Union for certain agricultural and industrial products | 1 |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2015/2449 of 14 December 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 1387/2013 suspending the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on certain agricultural and industrial products | 11 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2015/2448 of 14 December 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 1388/2013 opening and providing for the management of autonomous tariff quotas of the Union for certain agricultural and industrial products

1

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2015/2449 of 14 December 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 1387/2013 suspending the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on certain agricultural and industrial products

11

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
March 12, 2015 

Mr. William Beau Bevins 

7447 Meadow Street 

Anchorage, AK 99507 

Dear Mr. Bevins: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request 

We entered your February 10, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0238), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3079 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3079

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To take certain Federal land located in Tuolumne County, California, 
into trust for the benefit of the Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND INTO TRUST.

    (a) Federal Land.--Subject to valid existing rights, all right, 
title, and interest (including improvements and appurtenances) of the 
United States in and to the Federal land described in subsection (b) 
shall be held in trust by the United States for the benefit of the 
Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians for nongaming purposes.
    (b) Land Description.--The land taken into trust under subsection 
(a) is the approximately 80 acres of Federal land under the 
administrative jurisdiction of the United States Forest Service, 
located in Tuolumne County, California, and described as follows:
            (1) Southwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 1 
        North, Range 16 East.
            (2) Northeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 
        1 North, Range 16 East of the Mount Diablo Meridian.
    (c) Gaming.--Class II and class III gaming (as those terms are 
defined in section 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 
2703)) shall not be permitted at any time on the land taken into trust 
under subsection (a).

            Passed the House of Representatives July 5, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3079

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To take certain Federal land located in Tuolumne County, California, 
into trust for the benefit of the Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians, and 
                          for other purposes.
```