alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 18

March 30,
2010

Board
of Directors
Oxford Industries, Inc.
222 Piedmont Avenue, NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30308

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

Note 1
of Notes to the consolidated financial statements of Oxford Industries, Inc. included in its Form 10-K for the year ended January 30, 2010
describes a change in the method of accounting for the valuation of certain inventories from the lower of cost, as determined by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, or
market, to the lower of cost, as determined by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, or market. There are no authoritative criteria for determining a "preferable" inventory
accounting method based on the particular circumstances; however, we conclude that such a change in the method of accounting is to an acceptable alternative method which, based on your business
judgment to make this change and for the stated reasons, is preferable in your circumstances.

Very truly yours,/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


---



QuickLinks
# Official Journal C 321/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 321 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6111 September 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 321

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6111 September 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | OPINIONS |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 321/01 | Commission Opinion of 7 September 2018 relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the Sellafield Box Encapsulation Plant Product Store 1 and associated Direct Import Facility located in the United Kingdom | 1 |

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

OPINIONS

European Commission

2018/C 321/01

Commission Opinion of 7 September 2018 relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the Sellafield Box Encapsulation Plant Product Store 1 and associated Direct Import Facility located in the United Kingdom

1

---

| | II   Information |
| --- | --- |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 321/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8983 — Spigas/Canarbino/Miogas) (
  1
  ) | 3 |

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 321/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8983 — Spigas/Canarbino/Miogas) (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 321/03 | Euro exchange rates | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 321/03

Euro exchange rates

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 321/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8842 — Tele2/Com Hem Holding) (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| 2018/C 321/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8995 — MAGNA/OLSA) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 7 |
| 2018/C 321/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8991 — Alphabet/ResMed/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2018/C 321/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8842 — Tele2/Com Hem Holding) (
  1
  )

1

5

2018/C 321/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8995 — MAGNA/OLSA) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

7

2018/C 321/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8991 — Alphabet/ResMed/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 349 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-682, CP2024-691.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21383 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Ex parte CARRINGTON.

No. 18116.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 19, 1936.

W. R.< Smith, Jr., of Austin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*346MORROW, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from the order of the district judge refusing to release the relator from custody.

It appears from the record that on the 24th day of July, 1935, the relator, Walter Carrington, was arrested by the chief of police of the city of Austin. The relator sought release in the district court by way of writ of habeas corpus. The judge presiding granted the writ, and, upon final hearing, declined to discharge the relator. Notice of appeal was given, and the relator now seeks to be discharged by the Court of. Criminal Appeals.

The record is before us without statement of facts and bills of exception. Therefore, we are constrained to deny the release sought, which is accordingly done.

The judgment is affirmed.
ccaa_ex103.htm

 EXHIBIT 10.3
  
  
  
  
  	 
	1

	 

	 


  
  
  	 
	2

	 

	 


  
  
  
  	 3
p.1 

OAR Box 1147 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

139) IV-E-12 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:55 PM Sheet 139 of 242 
P.2 

Af^r/-"< 

^>- JSA^'I^ I must,. x, 

4 --mffi2. § UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

\ , eC>"°* WASHINGTON , DC . 2046 0 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Meeting with Representatives of API Regarding 

Gasoline Volatility and Onboard Proposals 

•') • 

FROM: Ralph J. Colleli Jr., Attorney \-

Air and Radiation Division (LE-132A) 

TO: Dockets Nos. A-85-21, A-87-11 

On November 4, 1987, Mark Himmelstein and Bill O'Keefe of 

the American Petroleum Institute met with representatives of EPA, 

including Assistant Administrator Potter of the Office of Air and 

Radiation, to discuss EPA's gasoline volatility and onboard 

hydrocarbon controls proposals. API informed EPA that API was 

continuing to do research on onboard safety issues. API also 

stated that it did not believe that Stage II controls should be 

considered as an interim VOC control measure by States with 

ozone nonattainment areas, and that such states should be allowed 

"credit" for future reductions in ozone that could result from 

onboard controls.
**Exhibit 12.1****COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP****Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**           **For the three-month period**  **ended March 31,***(all dollar amounts in thousands)* **2007** **2006**   **Earnings:**        Pre-tax income (loss) before adjustment for minority interest inconsolidated subsidiaries or income, loss from equity investees,extraordinary gain or loss, or gains on sale of properties $(1,980) $(4,590)Amortization of interest capitalized  650   600 Interest capitalized  (6,245)  (2,894)Distributed income of equity investees  2,335   1,915 Fixed charges  35,806   36,830             Total earnings $30,566  $31,861             **Fixed Charges:**        Interest expense $27,904  $32,407 Capitalized interest  6,245   2,894 Debt costs amortization  1,657   1,529             Total Fixed Charges $35,806  $36,830             **Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**  (a)  (a)    a) *For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and2006, the aggregate amount of fixed charges exceededour earnings by approximately $5.2 million and $5.0million, respectively, which is the amount ofadditional earnings that would have been required toachieve a ratio of earnings to fixed charges of 1.0xfor such period. The deficiency of the ratio ofearnings to fixed charges for the three months endedMarch 31, 2007 and 2006 is primarily due to theclassification of operations for assets held for saleand sold as discontinued operations.*The ratios of earnings to fixed charges were computed by dividing earnings byfixed charges. For this purpose, earnings consist of pre-tax income fromcontinuing operations before adjustment for minority interest in consolidatedsubsidiaries or income or loss from equity investees, gains on sale ofproperties, distributed income of equity investees, fixed charges andamortization of capitalized interest excluding interest costs capitalized.Fixed charges consist of interest expense (including interest costscapitalized) and amortization of debt issuance costs.
36
# C_2021228EN.01001601.xml

| 14.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/16

---

Appeal brought on 2 February 2021 by Laure Camerin against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 24 November 2020 in Case T-367/19, Camerin v Commission

(Case C-63/21 P)

(2021/C 228/20)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Laure Camerin (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the order of the General Court delivered on 24 November 2020 in Case T-367/19; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the order of the General Court delivered on 24 November 2020 in Case T-367/19;

| — | Order the Commission to pay all the costs, including those incurred before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay all the costs, including those incurred before the General Court.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The appeal seeks the annulment of the order under appeal in so far as the General Court declared that there was no longer any need to adjudicate and declared the inadmissibility of the application which sought partial annulment of the decision of the PMO of 17 April 2019 and compensation for the non-material damage that the applicant claims to have suffered as a result of the irregularities allegedly committed by the PMO, which make it impossible for the applicant to live in dignity.

In her appeal, the appellant disputes, in particular paragraphs 50 to 52 and 54 of the order under appeal and paragraphs 57 to 62, 67 and 73 to 74 of that order.

In support of the appeal, the appellant puts forward a single ground of appeal, alleging distortion of the facts and manifest errors of assessment resulting in an incorrect statement of reasons in law.

---
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

MATI FRANCO, * 

 * No. 16-99V 

 Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran 

 * 

v. * Filed: January 26, 2018 

 * 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; pneumococcal vaccine; 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”)

 * 

 Respondent. * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for Petitioner; 

Ryan D. Pyles, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. 

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

 On January 25, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the 

petition for compensation filed by Mati Franco on January 19, 2016. Petitioner 

alleged that the pneumococcal vaccine she received on February 20, 2015, which is 

contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), caused 

her to suffer Guillain-Barré syndrome. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered 

the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner represents 

that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on 

her behalf as a result of her condition. 

Respondent denies that the pneumococcal vaccine caused petitioner to suffer 

Guillain-Barré syndrome, or any other injury. 

 

1 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and 

Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its 

website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing 

redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). 

Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website. 
2

 Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The 

undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the 

Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. 

 

Damages awarded in that stipulation include: 

A lump sum payment of $150,000.00 in the form of a check payable to 

petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that 

would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 

 In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, 

the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 16-99V according to this decision 

and the attached stipulation.2

 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

 s/Christian J. Moran 

 Christian J. Moran 

 Special Master 

 

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each 

party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal 

Claims judge.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 12
                   Calculation of Earnings to Fixed Charges


                                   1997      1998      1999      2000     2001
                                   ----      ----      ----      ----     ----

Total interest                     2,414     2,743     3,667     6,297    5,064
Amortization of financing cost       158       278       354     1,113    1,268
                                  ---------------------------------------------

     Fixed charges                 2,572     3,021     4,021     7,410    6,332
                                  ---------------------------------------------


Pretax income                       (684)  (10,436)   (8,398)   (6,155)   1,419
     Add fixed charges             2,572     3,021     4,021     7,410    6,332
                                  ---------------------------------------------

     Adjusted earnings             1,888    (7,415)   (4,377)    1,255    7,751
                                  ---------------------------------------------


Earnings to fixed charges ratio       73%     -245%     -109%       17%     122%
                                  =============================================


Surplus/(Deficiency)                (684)  (10,436)   (8,398)   (6,155)   1,419
                                  =============================================
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3125 

To require the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to report 

to the Congress semiannually on the number of firearms transfers resulting from the failure to complete a background check within 3 business 

days, and the procedures followed after it is discovered that a firearm 

transfer has been made to a transferee who is ineligible to receive 

a firearm. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2015 

Ms. JACKSON LEE (for herself, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. COHEN, Mr. 

HONDA, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, and Mr. CUMMINGS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to report to the Congress semiannually on the number of firearms transfers resulting from the failure to 

complete a background check within 3 business days, 

and the procedures followed after it is discovered that 

a firearm transfer has been made to a transferee who 

is ineligible to receive a firearm. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3125 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accidental Firearms 

3 Transfers Reporting Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FBI REPORT ON FIREARMS TRANSFERS RESULTING 

5 FROM THE FAILURE TO COMPLETE A BACK6 GROUND CHECK WITHIN 3 BUSINESS DAYS, 

7 AND THE PROCEDURES FOLLOWED AFTER IT 

8 IS DISCOVERED THAT A FIREARM TRANSFER 

9 HAS BEEN MADE TO A TRANSFEREE WHO IS 

10 INELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE A FIREARM. 

11 Within 120 days after the date of the enactment of 

12 this Act and every 6 months thereafter, the Director of 

13 the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall submit to the 

14 Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representa15 tives and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate 

16 a written report on— 

17 (1) the number of proposed firearm transfers— 

18 (A) about which a person licensed under 

19 chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, con20 tacted the national instant criminal background 

21 check system established under section 103 of 

22 the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act; 

23 (B) with respect to which the system failed 

24 to respond to the licensee within 3 business 

25 days; and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3125 IH

1 (C) which were completed in the period 

2 covered by the report; and 

3 (2) the procedures followed after it is discovered 

4 that a firearm transfer has been made to a trans5 feree who is ineligible to receive a firearm. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.31

                                PROMISSORY NOTE

$52,369.52                                                         July 26, 1995

      For value received, Mitchell Blatt ("Maker") promises to pay to the order
of SAS Acquisitions Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), at its offices
in Roslyn, New York, or such other place as designated in writing by the holder
hereof, the aggregate principal sum of $52,369.52. Maker will pay the aggregate
principal sum in eight equal payments of 6,546.19 on each of the first eight
anniversary dates o f the date hereof and, on each such date, Maker will pay
interest accrued through such date at the rate specified below. This Note was
issued pursuant to and is subject to the terms of the Executive Stock Agreement,
dated as of July 26, 1995, among the Company and Maker and certain other
Purchasers named therein.

      Interest will accrue on the outstanding principal amount of this Note at a
rate equal to the lesser of (i) 8% per annum or (ii) the highest rate permitted
by applicable law, and shall be payable at such time as the principal of this
Note becomes due and payable.

      The amounts due under this Note are secured by a pledge of 4,000 shares of
the Company's Class B Common Stock. In the event Maker fails to pay any amounts
due hereunder when due, Maker shall pay to the holder hereof, in addition to
such amounts due, all costs of collection, including reasonable attorneys fees.

      Maker, or his successors and assigns, hereby waives diligence,
presentment, protest and demand and notice of protest, demand, dishonor and
nonpayment of this Note, and expressly agrees that this Note, or any payment
hereunder, may be extended from time to time and that the holder hereof may
accept security for this Note or release security for this Note, all without in
any way affecting the liability of Maker hereunder.
<PAGE>
      THIS NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE INTERNAL LAWS, NOT THE LAWS OF
CONFLICTS, OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                           /s/ MITCHELL BLATT
                                           -------------------------
                                           MITCHELL BLATT


DATED: July 26, 1995
# C_2023131EN.01001201.xml

| 14.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/12

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.104539

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 131/11)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 28.10.2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.104539 |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Progetto Polis (II) — Sportello Unico |
| Legal basis | National Plan for Complementary Investments to the Recovery and Resilience Plan |
| Type of measure | Ad Hoc Case
  Poste Italiane SpA (‘Poste Italiane’) |
| Objective | Sectorial development, Regional development (including territorial cooperation) |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 512 400 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 512 400 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | |
| Economic sectors | Postal and courier activities, FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE ACTIVITIES |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Direzione generale per i servizi di comunicazione elettronica, di radiodiffusione e postali |
| Viale America 201, 00144 Roma |

Date of adoption of the decision

28.10.2022

Aid number

SA.104539

Member State

Italy

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Progetto Polis (II) — Sportello Unico

Legal basis

National Plan for Complementary Investments to the Recovery and Resilience Plan

Type of measure

Ad Hoc Case

Poste Italiane SpA (‘Poste Italiane’)

Objective

Sectorial development, Regional development (including territorial cooperation)

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 512 400 000 EUR

Annual budget: 512 400 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Economic sectors

Postal and courier activities, FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE ACTIVITIES

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Direzione generale per i servizi di comunicazione elettronica, di radiodiffusione e postali

Viale America 201, 00144 Roma

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---