alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CI2022121EN.01000101.xml

| 16.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 121/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 121/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/429, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/427 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2022/C 121 I/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/429 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/427 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons, entities and bodies should be included in the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for the designation of those persons, entities and bodies appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons, entities and bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address before 1 June 2022:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 87 I, 15.3.2022, p. 44.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(4)  OJ L 87 I, 15.3.2022, p. 1.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3046 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3046

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify and permanently 
    extend qualified zone academy bonds, and to treat such bonds as 
                      specified tax credit bonds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 2015

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify and permanently 
    extend qualified zone academy bonds, and to treat such bonds as 
                      specified tax credit bonds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rebuilding America's Schools Act''.

SEC. 2. ENHANCEMENT OF QUALIFIED ZONE ACADEMY BONDS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 54E(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``and $400,000,000 for 
2011'' and all that follows through the period and inserting the 
following: ``$400,000,000 for 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014, and 
$1,400,000,000 for each calendar year after 2014.''.
    (b) Construction of a Public School Facility.--Subparagraph (A) of 
section 54E(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
striking ``rehabilitating or repairing'' and inserting ``constructing, 
rehabilitating, or repairing''.
    (c) Adjustment of Private Business Contribution Requirement.--
Subsection (b) of section 54E of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking ``10 percent'' and inserting ``5 percent''.
    (d) Specified Tax Credit Bond.--Clause (iii) of section 
6431(f)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read 
as follows:
                            ``(iii) a qualified zone academy bond (as 
                        defined in section 54E), or''.
    (e) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to obligations issued after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
#### AMERICAN PUB. CO. v. HOLLAND.

No. 8213.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

Dec. 18, 1935.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 8, 1936.

Thos. C. Ferguson, of Burnet, and Sam-uels, Foster, Brown & McGee, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

McCLENDON, Chief Justice.

Appeal from an interlocutory order overruling a plea of privilege seeking to change the venue to the county (Travis) of appellant’s residence. The suit is one for damages for publication of an allegedly libel-pus article concerning appellee in “The Austin American,” a newspaper published in Travis county and alleged to be owned ¡by appellant. No proof was offered upon the fact of such ownership, which omission forms the basis of appellant’s assertion of reversible error.

While the issue thus raised has been the subject of much conflict of opinion among the several Courts of Civil Appeals, we believe the recent decision in Farmers’ .Seed & Gin Co. v. Brooks (Tex.Com.App.) 81 S.W.(2d) 675, 679, is decisive of this conflict. The principle there decided is .embodied in the following quotation from .the opinion: “The burden resting upon plaintiff under his controverting plea is to ¡prove, not his case, but ‘that the case is within one of the exceptions’ to the statute.”

The specific question in that case was whether, in a suit upon a written contract promising performance in the county where the suit was filed, it was necessary, in order to support venue there, to prove a breach of the contract. This question was answered in the negative.

Cited with approval is Bradley v. Trinity ,State Bank, 118 Tex. 274, 14 S.W.(2d) 810. That decision is, we believe, directly in point here. That was a suit upon a promissory note payable in the county where .the suit was filed. Plaintiff was not the original payee of the note, and there was mo proof that it owned the note. The holding was that this was an issue affect*287ing only the merits of the case, and had no relation to the issue of venue.

So here, whether appellant owned “The Austin American’” had no relation to the issue of venue, but was an ' essential element to appellee’s cause of action. If not proved in the trial upon the merits, the judgment must he for appellant whether the case was tried in Travis or Burnet county, or elsewhere.

The sole essentials to maintain venue in Burnet county were that (1) the suit was one for libel and (2) appellant resided in Burnet county when the cause of action arose. R.C.S. art. 1995, suhd. 29; Houston .Printing Co. v. Tennant (Tex.Civ.App.) 76 S.W. (2d) 762. These essentials were established either by proof or admission at the hearing.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Park Bancorp, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2008, (the Report), I,
Steven J. Pokrak, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Steven J. PokrakSteven J. Pokrak Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer  August 14, 2008
Exhibit 31-8

PECO ENERGY COMPANY

CERTIFICATION

I, Phillip S. Barnett, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PECO Energy Company; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2013



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    PHILLIP S. BARNETT                                   
|Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
# Official Journal C 334A/2011

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2011.334.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 334A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5415 November 2011 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2011.334.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 334A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5415 November 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 334A/01 | Vacancy for a Director (Grade AD 14) of the Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy — COM/2011/10319 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2011/C 334A/01

Vacancy for a Director (Grade AD 14) of the Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy — COM/2011/10319

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 19 | (PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 24 | |
| 35 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 37 | (PL/RO) |
| 60 | |
| 68 | |
| 76 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 82 | |
| 91 | |
| 98 | |
| 114 | (DA) |
| 121 | (DA) |
| 122 | |
| 135 | |
| 140 | (BG/ET/HU/MT/PL/SL/SV) |
| 142 | |
| 146 | |
| 147 | (EN/IT/MT/SV) |
| 155 | (EN/ES/ET/FR/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV) |
| 156 | |
| 157 | |
| 162 | |
| 169 | (EN) |
| 177 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 180 | (BG/RO) |
| 181 | (DA) |
| 183 | (SL) |
| 185 | |
| 193 | (BG/RO) |
| 198 | (CS/HU/LT/MT/PL/SK) |
| 206 | (CS/ES/LV/MT/SV) |
| 208 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 221 | |
| 222 | (BG/RO) |
| 223 | |
| 229 | |
| 257 | |
| 258 | |
| 270 | |
| 271 | |
| 278 | (EN) |
| 279 | (FR) |
| 281 | (DA) |
| 284 | (DE) |
| 285 | (LT) |
| 286 | (NL) |
| 292 | (RO) |
| 294 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 303 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 304 | (DA/EN) |
| 307 | |
| 309 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 312 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 315 | |
| 321 | (EN/FR) |
| 324 | |
| 330 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 334 | |

19

(PL)

24

35

(DE/EN/FR)

37

(PL/RO)

60

68

76

(DE/EN/FR)

82

91

98

114

(DA)

121

(DA)

122

135

140

(BG/ET/HU/MT/PL/SL/SV)

142

146

147

(EN/IT/MT/SV)

155

(EN/ES/ET/FR/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV)

156

157

162

169

(EN)

177

(DE/EN/FR)

180

(BG/RO)

181

(DA)

183

(SL)

185

193

(BG/RO)

198

(CS/HU/LT/MT/PL/SK)

206

(CS/ES/LV/MT/SV)

208

(DE/EN/FR)

221

222

(BG/RO)

223

229

257

258

270

271

278

(EN)

279

(FR)

281

(DA)

284

(DE)

285

(LT)

286

(NL)

292

(RO)

294

(DE/EN/FR)

303

(DE/EN/FR)

304

(DA/EN)

307

309

(DE/EN/FR)

312

(DE/EN/FR)

315

321

(EN/FR)

324

330

(DE/EN/FR)

334

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
exv10w2



 






EXHIBIT 10.2




AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into by and between Arizona Public
Service Company (“APS”) and James M. Levine (“Employee”).



WITNESSETH:




     WHEREAS, APS and Employee entered into an Employment Agreement dated
October 11, 2002 (“Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, the parties desire to correct an error in the original Agreement
by amending the Agreement to revise Employee’s allocation of additional shares
of restricted stock.



     NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of October 11, 2002, the Agreement is amended
as follows:



     1. Section 4(c) is deleted in its entirety and the following new Section
4(c) is inserted in lieu thereof:




(c) Additional Restricted Shares. In addition to (b) above, the
Company agrees to annually, for the term of this Agreement, request
the Human Resources Committee to grant Employee 2000 shares of
restricted stock under the 1994 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “1994
Plan”) without any vesting requirement, all in accordance with the
terms of the 1994 Plan and as previously agreed upon by the
parties.



     2. Except as otherwise set forth herein, the terms and conditions in the
original Agreement remain in full force and effect.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	11-2-04	 	By:	 	/s/ Jack Davis
	

	 	
 
	 	 	 	
 
	

	 	 	 	 	 	Jack Davis
	

	 	 	 	 	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:
	 	11-4-04	 	 	 	/s/ James M. Levine
	

	 	
 
	 	 	 	
 
	

	 	 	 	 	 	James M. Levine







H:\employ\Levine\LevineAmendment
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3139 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3139

        To improve security at Armed Forces recruitment centers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2015

 Mr. Hunter (for himself, Mr. Perry, Mr. Yoder, Mr. Knight, Mr. Joyce, 
Mr. Rouzer, Ms. Jenkins of Kansas, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Zinke, Mr. Valadao, 
  Mr. Hill, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Mr. Sanford, Mrs. Walorski, Mr. 
 Shimkus, Mr. Jones, Mr. Huelskamp, Mr. Westerman, Mr. Austin Scott of 
Georgia, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Heck of Nevada, and Mr. Kinzinger of Illinois) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To improve security at Armed Forces recruitment centers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Securing Military Personnel Response 
Firearm Initiative Act'' or ``SEMPER FI Act''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVED SECURITY MEASURES FOR PROTECTION OF ARMED FORCES 
              RECRUITMENT CENTERS AGAINST TERRORIST ATTACK.

    (a) Service-Issue Sidearms Authorized for Certain Members.--The 
Secretary concerned shall authorize an eligible member of the Armed 
Forces assigned to duty at an Armed Forces recruitment center to carry 
a service-issue sidearm as a personal- or force-protection measure 
while on duty at the recruiting center notwithstanding any Federal, 
State, or local law or Department of Defense policy to the contrary.
    (b) Alternative or Additional Security Measures.--In lieu of 
authorizing eligible members of the Armed Forces to carry a service-
issue sidearm under subsection (a) or in addition to authorizing such 
members to carry a service-issue sidearm under such subsection, the 
Secretary concerned may develop and implement additional security 
measures for Armed Forces recruitment centers under the jurisdiction of 
the Secretary concerned, including improved structural security 
measures.
    (c) Relation to Posse Comitatus Act.--This section shall not be 
interpreted to grant any member of the Armed Forces the authority to 
conduct civilian law enforcement functions within the territory of the 
United States.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) The terms ``Armed Forces'' and ``Secretary concerned'' 
        have the meanings given those terms in section 101(a) of title 
        10, United States Code.
            (2) The term ``eligible member'' means a member of the 
        Armed Forces who is an officer or noncommissioned officer.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit (10)(i)



COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS



December 5, 2002



WHEREAS, Article IV, Section 10 of the corporations By-Laws states: The board of directors shall have the authority to fix the
compensation of directors.;



NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that effective January 1, 2003, the compensation of the outside directors of this corporation shall be:



| | 1. |  | An annual retainer fee in the sum of $24,000, irrespective of attendance at meetings of the board of directors; and
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In addition, an annual retainer fee for the vice chair in the sum of
$15,000, irrespective of attendance at meetings of the board of directors; and



| | 2. |  | An annual retainer fee in the sum of $5,000 for the chair of the audit committee, irrespective of attendance at committee meetings; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In addition, an annual retainer fee in the sum of $3,000 for the chairs
of the boards other standing committees, irrespective of attendance at committee meetings; and



| | 3. |  | An additional fee in the sum of $1,200 for each meeting of the board of directors attended; and
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. |  | An additional fee for committee members in the sum of $1,200 for each meeting of a committee of the board of directors attended; and
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 5. |  | Reimbursement for all expenses incidental to attendance at a meeting of the board of directors or a meeting of a committee of the board of directors, and for any other expense
incurred on behalf of the corporation.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### On **- board	Circulation	and	Seating	Subcommittee**  **Call (#**  **10 )**  **11/12 /2014**  U.S.	Access	Board:	Rail	Vehicle s Access	Advisory	Committee Subcommittee	for On - board	Circulation	and	Seating 1.		Introductions 2.		Approval	of	the	Agenda 3.		Review	and	completion	of the	attached	matrix.	Please	note	the	addition	of	seat	handrail information	in	note	22	and	revisions	to	6c. The	attached	matrix	has	been revised	with	revisions RED,	underlined	and	itallic . Items	in	green were	from	the	last	review. 4. Review	the	images	provided	by	BART 5.			Seat	“handles” See	note	22	on	the	matrix 6.		Original	“issues”	list.	Have	we	captured	everything	between	the	subcommittees? 7 .		Next	Steps :

 .		Action	Items

 .		Assignments

 .		Deadlines 8 .		Next	Meeting [Attachments]
----

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘proposal for a Council Regulation on the common organisation of the market in olive oil and table olives and amending Regulation (EEC) No. 827/68’

(COM(2003) 698 final – 2003/0279 (CNS))

(2004/C 110/07)

On 1 December 2003, the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 36 and Article 37(2), third paragraph, of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the above-mentioned proposal.

The Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its opinion on 5 February 2004. The rapporteur was Mrs Santiago.

At its 406th plenary session held on 25 and 26 February 2004 (meeting of 25 February), the European Economic and Social Committee adopted the following opinion by 103 votes to three with two abstentions:

1.   Introduction

2.   General comments

Brussels, 25 February 2004.

The President

of the Economic and Social Committee

Roger BRIESCH

----

(1)  NAT/102; OJ C 221 of 7.8.2001, pp. 68-73.

----
# C_2023131EN.01000301.xml

| 14.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/3

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.106462

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 131/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 9.3.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.106462 |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Region | Ireland |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCF: Licensed Road Haulage Operators Emergency Support Scheme (re-introduction of scheme SA.102559) |
| Legal basis | Government Decision S180/20/10/2271A of 14 February 2023, adopted on the basis of a Memorandum for the Government ‘Licensed Haulage Support Scheme 2023’ |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 18 000 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 18 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Freight transport by road |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Department of Transport |
| Department of Transport, Leeson Lane, Dublin 2, D02 TR60, Ireland |

Date of adoption of the decision

9.3.2023

Aid number

SA.106462

Member State

Ireland

Region

Ireland

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCF: Licensed Road Haulage Operators Emergency Support Scheme (re-introduction of scheme SA.102559)

Legal basis

Government Decision S180/20/10/2271A of 14 February 2023, adopted on the basis of a Memorandum for the Government ‘Licensed Haulage Support Scheme 2023’

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 18 000 000 EUR

Annual budget: 18 000 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Freight transport by road

Name and address of the granting authority

Department of Transport

Department of Transport, Leeson Lane, Dublin 2, D02 TR60, Ireland

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---