1 | Page United States Office of Chemical Environmental Protection Safety and Pollution Agency Prevention August 2011



# HUMAN HEALTH HAZARDS OF **ALTERNATIVE RESIN TECHNOLOGIES REPLACING UREA** **- FORMALDEHYDE RESIN** 2 | Page



## T**ABLE OF** 

## C**ONTENTS** L IST OF TABLES ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 3 C ONTRIBUTORS ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 4 G LOSSARY OF T ERMS AND A BBREVIATIONS ................................ ................................ ................................ 5 E XECUTIVE S UMMARY ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................... 6 L EGISLATIVE M ANDATE AND O BJECTIVES ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 8 U REA- F ORMALDEHYDE (UF) R ESINS ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 8 I DENTIFICATION OF A LTERNATIVE R ESINS ................................ ................................ ................................ 11 PHENOL - FORMALDEHYDE (PF) R ESINS ................................ ................................ ............................... 12 METHYLENE DIPHENYL DIISOCYANATE (MDI) RESINS ................................ ................................ ............. 14 POLYVINYL ALCOHOL

/ POLYVINYL ACETATE (PVA) RESINS ................................ ................................ ........ 15 B IO- BASED A DHESIVES ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 16

— T ANNIN- CONTAINING RESINS ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 17

— POLYAMIDE EPICHLOROHY DRIN (PAE)/

SOY RESINS ................................ ................................ ........ 18

— C ASHEW NUT SHELL LIQUID (CNSL)
- BASED RESINS ................................ ................................ ......... 19 MELAMINE- BASED RESINS ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 19 SCAVENGERS AND ADDITI VES ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 20 C ONC LUSIONS ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 22 R EFERENCES ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 233 | Page



## L **IST OF** 

## T**ABLES** Table 1. Formaldehyde Exposure in the Life Cycle of UF
- Bonded CWPs
................................ ...... 9 Table 2 . Alternative Resin Technologies and Selected Chemical Substances Used in Resin and Composite Wood Product Manufacturing
................................ ................................ ..... 12 Table 3. Formaldehyde and Phenol Exposures in the Life Cycle of PF
- Bonded CWPs
................ 13 Table 4. MDI /pMDI Exposure in the Life Cycle of MDI/pMDI

- Bonded CWPs
............................. 15 Table 5. Vinyl acetate monomer exposure in the life cycle of PVA
- bonded CWPs
..................... 16 Table 6. Methanol exposure in the life cycle of tannin
- bonded CWPs
................................ ....... 17 Table 7. Epichlorohydrin exposure in the life cycle of PAE/soy

- bonded CWPs
........................... 194 | Page



## C**ONTRIBUTORS** Author: Iris A. Camacho
- Ramos Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention Portions of this document were developed under contract with Syracuse Research Corporation (SRC), Inc. The following SRC staff developed the hazard information used in this report: Ashlee Aldridge, Christopher Janson, Justine Von Runnen, Teresa Manyin, W illiam L. Richards and Joan D. Garey
.5 | Page



## G **LOSSARY OF** 

## T **ERMS AND** 

## A **BBREVIATIONS** ATCM Airborne toxic control m easure CARB California Air Resources Board CAS RN C hemistry A bstracts S ervice R egistry N umber CNSL Cashew nut shell liquid CWP Comp os ite wood products EPA Environmental Protection Agency GI Gastrointestinal HWPW Hardwood plywood IRIS Integrated Risk Information System MDA 4,4’
- methylenedianiline MDI Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate MF Melamine formaldehyde MUF Melamine urea formaldehyde NAF No
- added formaldehyde NAS National Academy of Sciences PAE Polyamide epichlorohydrin PF Phenol formaldehyde pMDI Polymeric methylene diphenyl diisocyanate PPE Personal protective equipment PVA Polyvinyl acetate RfC Reference conc entration TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act UF Urea formaldehyde ULEF Ultra low
- emitting formaldehyde μg/m 3 Micrograms per cubic meter VAM Vinyl acetate monomer6 | Page



## E **XECUTIVE** 

## S **UMMARY** This review of the human health hazards of alternative resin technologies replacing urea
formaldehyde (UF) resin was developed in support of implementing regulations by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
. Under the recently established Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products Act (“Formaldehyde Standards Act”), EPA must establish national limits for formaldehyde emissions from hardwood plywood, part icleboard and medium
- density fiberboard. Formaldehyde is capable of producing serious adverse effects in humans by inhalation and dermal exposure , especially over prolonged periods of time
. Sensory irritation is the most frequently reported health sympto m by workers manufacturing UF resins and/or composite wood products ( CWPs ) , as well as by the general population that spend most of their time in office buildings or residential units containing UF
- bonded CWP s. Formaldehyde is a human carcinogen, may also cause neurological effects via the inhalation route and dermatological effects (e.g. , allergic contact dermatitis) after dermal exposure. Individuals with asthma or other respiratory problems may be especially sensitive to formaldehyde’s toxicity. UF resins are the standard adhesives used in many CWP s . Formaldehyde released from UF resins may present a health hazard to those who have UF
- bonded wood panels in their homes or office workplace. Levels of exposure to formaldehyde are even greater among tho se who manufacture the UF resin or who are exposed to it during the manufacture of UF
- bonded CWPs ; thus workers are more vulnerable to formaldehyde’s toxic effects. In this report, seven alternative resins were assessed and then compared and contrasted to urea -formaldehyde t o determine the potential for reducing formaldehyde exposure and its adverse health effects . Some of the alternative resins ha ve no added formaldehyde; others contain formaldehyde, but emissions of formaldehyde are reduced compared to UF in at least some stages of the product life cycle. In addition, scavengers and additives used to minimize formaldehyde releases from formaldehyde
- based resins were evaluated. A summary of the key observations is presented below. **Residential and office environment**  Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate ( MDI )/p olymeric MDI , polyvinyl alcohol/polyvinyl acetate ( PVA ) and polyamide epichlorohydrin/soy resins are considered no
- added formaldehyde resins; thus, the se resins do not release any formaldehyd e in the bonded wood products. On the other hand, a lternative resins based on phenol
-formaldehyde (PF), tannin (e.g., tannin
-formaldehyde, tannin
- PF, or tannin
- UF) , cashew nut shell liquid (CNSL) (e.g., CNSL
-formaldehyde, CNSL
- PF, or CNSL
- UF) , and melamine (e.g
. , melamine
-formaldehyde, melamine
- UF ) contain formaldehyde, but CWPs containing them are expected to have much lower formaldehyde emissions than UF
bonded CWPs resulting in a reduction of the exposures t o formaldehyde.7 | Page

Furthermore, among the seven alterna tive resins and scavengers/additives, many chemicals of concern to human health were identified besides formaldehyde; among the most toxic ones are phenol, MDI, vinyl acetate monomer (VAM), methanol, epichlorohydrin, ammonia , and chromium compounds. These chemicals, when contained in the final CWP, are expected to constitute a negligible health hazard because emissions are not expected to occupants of office and residential buildings. **Workplace environment** Chemical production of UF resins and alternati ve resins involve the use of raw materials such as formaldehyde, phenol, MDI, VAM, methanol, epichlorohydrin, ammonia, and chromium compounds. Hot
- pressing operations during CWP manufacturing increase the potential for worker exposures to these chemicals due to increased volatility. Workers at these life cycle stages are the most exposed population to these chemicals and their degree of exposure depends on many factors, including the availability and effective use of personal protective equipment (PPE) an d air emission control technologies (e.g. , scrubbing systems) at the workplace. Regarding workers involved in downstream CWP manufacturing, e xposures to formaldehyde and other chemicals of concern would be similar to those described above for the resident ial and work environment. The toxicity profiles of formaldehyde, phenol, MDI, VAM, methanol, epichlorohydrin, ammonia, and chromium compounds are well characterized in the scientific literature . Human epidemiological data and laboratory studies in anim als have reported serious adverse effects (e.g., respiratory, neurological, reproductive, and/or carcinogenic effects) for these chemical substances. Thus, EPA assessed inhalation and dermal exposures in workers involved in the initial stages of the life cycle where the production of polymers (resin) and the manufacturing o f the bonded panels take place
. Occupational h ealth impacts from these chemical substances are reduced when feasible engineering and work practice controls ( e.g., PPE) are available at the workplace.8 | Page



## L **EGISLATIVE** 

## M **ANDATE AND** 

## O **BJECTIVES** The United States Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) is implementing regulations under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to reduce exposures to formaldehyde from composite wood products (CWP s )
. On July 7, 2010, the Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products Act (“Formaldehyde Standards Act”) was signed into law. Under the Formaldehyde Standards Act, EPA must promulgate imple menting regulations by January 1 , 2013, that establish national limits for formaldehyde emissions from hardwood plywood (HWPW) , particleboard, and medium
- density fiberboard. This legislation, which adds a Title VI to TSCA, mirrors regulations previously established by the California Air Resources Board (CARB ) for CWPs sold, offered for sale, supplied, used or manufactured for sale in California. The standards apply to CWP s in both unfinished panels and finished products that contain urea
formaldehyde (UF) resins (i.e. , high
- emitting formaldehyde resin) . The Act also promulgates emission standards for CWPs made out of alternative resin technologies such as low
- emitting formaldehyde a nd no
- added formaldehyde (NAF) resins ; these are the resins that are evaluated in this report. In support of the implementing regulations, this assessment discuss es the potential human health hazards and exposure potential of UF resins and available alternative resins across different stages of the life cycle process for CWPs
. This analysis does not consider emissions from other volatile compounds inherently present in the wood (Salthammer et al. , 2010). A cost
- benefit analysis will be developed for the implementing regulations as required by Executive Order 12866 ( “Regulatory Planning and Review” )
. This hazard assessment will provide support for the economic analysis of costs and benefits
. 

## U **REA**

## - **F ORMALDEHYDE**  

## (UF) **R ESINS**  UF resins are the standard adhesives used in the manufactur e of many CWP s, such as HWPW, medium
- density fiberboard and particleboard. UF resins are cros s- linked with the wood and usually cured under high temperature/pressure conditions to form an adhesive which binds the different wood feedstocks together to form the CWP s (EPA, 2011 b ). Formaldehyde is released from UF bonded products. UF resins are signi ficant sources of formaldehyde emissions. There are three possible sources of formaldehyde emissions from CWP s containing UF resins. Free, unreacted formaldehyde can off
-gas from the UF resin ; the amount of free formaldehyde depends on the ratio of urea and formaldehyde added to the resin and the reaction conditions (pH, temperature, time) during resin formation. Formaldehyde emissions also occur while the resin is curing during the manufactur ing process of CWPs . Lastly, exposure of CWPs to heat and humidity can contribute to formaldehyde releases (EPA, 2011).9 | Page

Because CWPs made with UF resins release formaldehyde, EPA is concerned about potential exposures to those living in houses containi ng UF
- resin building materials and those working in the CWP industry
. Breathing of low levels of formaldehyde (<100 ppb) is also expected in office and residential buildings ( e.g., commercial/consumer use) containing CWPs; therefore, the general populatio n ( e.g., children, adults, elderly) and office workers are also expected to be exposed to formaldehyde (Table 1 ; EPA, 2011c; EPA, 2011d). The rate of formaldehyde release is highest right after CWPs are manufactured and decreases rapidly after the first few months, reaching background levels in a few years; thus, the greatest exposure level for the consumer is when CWPs are relatively new. Dermal exposure is not expected to be a significant exposure route after UF resin and CWP manufacturing. D ermal and inhalation e xposure s to formaldehyde are expected for workers involved in the ma nufacture of UF resins and CWPs, especially in the absence of personal protective equipment (PPE) (EPA, 2011c; EPA, 2011d)
. **Table 1**  **. Formaldehyde E** **xposure in the L** **ife C** **ycle of UF -**  **B onded CWPs**  **Chemical Substance of Concern**  **Life Cycle Stage UF resin**  **manufacturing CWP** 

**manufacturing Downstream**  **product manufacturing**  **Commercial and**

**Consumer Use** Formaldehyde Inhalation and

dermal exposure s are expected
. Inhalation and

dermal exposure s are expected
. Inhalation

exposure is expected
. Inhalation exposure

is expected
. Note: The use of CWPs in office and residential building is an example of commercial/consumer use . Based on its toxicity profile, EPA decided to focus on formaldehyde as the chemical of concern for UF resins. Formaldehyde (CAS RN: 50
- 00
- 0) is a flammable , colorless gas at room temperature with a pungent, suffocating odor. It is a highly reactive, water soluble chemical that is rapidly absorbed by the respiratory tract. More than 90% of inhaled formaldehyde is absorbed in the upper respiratory tract. Although all tissues are capable of metabolizing formaldehyde, the tissues of the respiratory tract are expected to rapidly metabolize formaldehyde with little or no formaldehyde reaching the blood . Oral absorption is expected to be high, but dermal absorption is quite low. Once absorbed, formaldehyde is primarily metabolized by glutat hione
- dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenases
. Formaldehyde is oxidized to formate which enters various reactions resulting in the production of metabolic by
- products such as carbon dioxide ( ATSDR, 1999; IARC, 2006; NAC, 2008)
. Sensory irritation is the effect most frequently reported in humans after inhalation exposure to formaldehyde. Individuals may exhibit signs of eye, nose and throat irritation after inhaling formaldehyde for a short time or on a continuous basis. Pulmona ry function may be affected by repeated exposure to formaldehyde and there is evidence of increased asthma incidence associated with formaldehyde exposure
. I t is also likely that individuals with respir atory illnesses (e.g. , asthma, respiratory allergy ) w ill be more sensitive to the effects of inhaled formaldehyde ( ATSDR, 1999; ATSDR, 2010 ; IARC, 200 6)
.10 | Page

Moreover, l imited human studies suggest that chronic occupational exposure to formaldehyde vapors may be associated with reproductive effects in women ; however, other studies have not reported such association (ATSDR, 2010; NRC, 2008a). Neurological impairment has also been reported in people repeatedly exposed to formaldehyde vapors (ATSDR, 1999; ATSDR, 2010; NRC, 2008a). Formaldehyde has been clas sified as a known human carcinogen by the International Age ncy for Research on Cancer and the National Toxicology Program (IARC, 2006; NTP, 2011)
. In 1991, EPA classified formaldehyde as a probable human carcinogen and issued a quantitative estimate of ca rcinogenic risk in humans for inhalation exposures (i.e., inhalation unit risk= 1.3 x 10 - 5 per μg/m 3 ). The inhalation unit risk was based on nasal squamous cell carcinomas observed in male rats chronically exposed to formaldehyde (EPA, 1991). EPA’s Int egrated Risk Information System (IRIS) program is currently re
- evaluating the cancer risks of formaldehyde as well as developing a reference concentration (RfC) for non
- cancer effects. The latest draft IRIS assessment classified formaldehyde as carcinogen ic to humans by the inhalation route of exposure and derived an inhalation unit risk considering human epidemiological evidence for several types of nasal cancer and leukemias (EPA, 2010). The National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academy of Sci ences recently issued its review of the IRIS document on formaldehyde (NRC, 2011) and EPA is working on a revised assessment. Health effects have been reported for individuals dermally or orally exposed to formaldehyde. Repeated contact with liquid solut ions of formaldehyde has resulted in skin irritation and allergic contact dermatitis in humans. When ingested, formaldehyde solutions can cause severe injury to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract with signs of inflammation and ulceration of the mouth, esopha gus and stomach (NAC, 2008). Urea (CAS RN: 57
- 13
- 6) is another chemical substance used in the production of UF resins. Urea occurs naturally in mammals as an end
- product of amino acid metabolism, which is excreted (IPCS, 2009)
. It can be expected that the human organism is well
- adapted to urea within the normal physiological range of concentrations, as well as higher concentrations (OECD , 2002 a )
. This is supported by clinical evidence from high
- dose oral administration for therapeutic purposes (OE CD , 2002 a ) . The substance can be absorbed into the body by inhalation of its aerosol or by ingestion (I CS C, 1997) ; the rate of absorption via the dermal route is lower than that for inhalation or ingestion (OECD , 2002 a )
. Urea is irritating to the skin, e yes and respiratory tract ( ICSC, 1997) . The acute oral toxicity is low (OECD , 2002 a )
. Similarly, repeated
- dose toxicity by oral and dermal routes is low (OECD , 2002 a )
. The concern for reproductive and developmental toxicity is uncertain because appropriate studies are not available (OECD , 2002 a ) . Urea has caused DNA single strand breaks in mammalian cells in vitro and has been shown to be clastogenic in mammalian cells in vitro and in vivo, but only at concentrations well beyond the normal physi ological range (about 50
- 100 higher than concentrations found in human blood); therefore, there is little concern for genetic toxicity (OECD , 2002 a ) . There is no concern for carcinogenicity (OECD , 2002 a )
. Some exposure to urea11 | Page

may occur during the life cycle st age of UF resin manufacturing (EPA, 2011b) and s ignificant human health effect s are not expected due to its low hazard concern
. Methanol (CAS RN: 67
- 56
- 1) is used in the synthesis of formaldehyde, which is then used in the manufacture of UF resins
. Occupational exposures to methanol may produce eye, ski n and nasal irritation ( CalEPA, 2000 ; OECD , 2004a ; HSDB, 2011). M ethanol exposure has been associated with neurotoxicity (e.g., headache, dizziness, nausea and blurred vision) (CalEPA, 2000 ; OECD , 2004a ; NAC, 2005 ) , metabolic acidosis ( OECD , 2004a ; NAC, 2005 ) , liver and kidney effects ( OECD , 2004a ) , immunotoxicity ( OECD , 2004b ) , ocular toxicity (e.g., severe vision impairment and permanent blindness) ( OECD , 2004a ; HSDB, 2011) , developmental toxicity ( e.g., malformations, anomalies and neurodevelopmental effects) ( CalEPA, 2000 ; OECD , 2004a ; NAC, 2005 ; HSDB, 2011) , as well as carcinogenicity (likely human carcinogen based on animal data) ( OECD , 2004a )
. Methanol emissions are not expected aft er the curing process of CWPs; therefore, the human health impact during commercial/consumer use and downstream product manufacturing processes is likely to be minimal because inhalation exposure is not expected at those times. Workers continuously exposed to methanol are more vulnerable to methanol
- related effects in the absence of PPE during the manufacturing of UF resin s and CWPs. Methanol is a volatile chemical; therefore, i nhalation exposure is the most likely route, although dermal exposures to methanol solutions cannot be completely ruled out at the workplace
. During CWP manufacturing, boards are generally subject to high temperatures during the curing process. Because methanol’s volatility will be enhanced at high te mperatures, methanol expos ure is likely to be higher during CWP manufacturing rather than during the UF resin production (EPA, 2011b; EPA, 2011c)
. 

## I **DENTIFICATION OF** 

## A **LTERNATIVE** 

## R **ESINS** EPA identified various alternative resin technologies that are being used to replace UF resins in CWPs and achieve lower formaldehyde emissions (Table 2 ) (EPA, 2011a; EPA, 2011b). As part of the development of the list of alternative resins, chemistry information was evaluated to understand potential exposures to certain chemical substances involved in resin manufacturing as well as downstream processes ranging from CWP manufacturing to commercial and consumer use (EPA, 2011b). The alternative resins and scavengers are consistent with what industry is currently using in certain CWPs to meet the CARB airborne toxic control measure ( ATCM ) limits. Moreover, this analysis considers the resin technologies subject to regulatory emission standards by the Formaldehyde Standards Act . For instance, the Act sets emission standards for CWPs containing NAF
- based resins and may include resins using soy, polyvinyl acetate, and methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) in their composition. Similarly, the Act covers CWPs made out of ultra low
- emitting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins and may include resins containing melamine
- urea -formaldehyde (MUF) , phenol formaldehyde (PF) and resorcinol 1 formaldehyde. 1 Resorcinol is a phenolic resin adhesive.12 | Page

Table 2 also lists chemical substances that are important for resin and/or CWP functionality and that could present a relevant source of exposure at certain stages of the product’s life cycle, including additives and scavengers that are added to the resin matrix to reduce formaldehyde emissions and/or enhance wood bonding. **Table 2**  **. Alternative Resin Technologies and Selected Chemical Substances Used in Resin and Composite Wood Product Manufacturing** 

Type of Resin Name(s) of chemicals Phenol
- Formaldehyde (PF) resins Phenol, formaldehyde Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) resins MDI , formaldehyde Polyvinyl alcohol/polyvinyl acetate (PVA) resins Vinyl acetate monomer Bio
- based resin: Tannin
- containing resins Tannins, m ethanol , formaldehyde Bio
- based resin: P olyamide epichlorohydri n

(PAE)
- soy resin s Epichlorohydrin, s oy protein Bio
- based resin: Cashew nut shell liquid (CNSL)
-

containing resin s Cashew nut shell liquid , formaldehyde Melamine
- based resins (melamine
-formaldehyde or melamine
- urea formaldehyde resins) Urea, formaldehyde, melamine Scavengers and additives used in alternative resins U rea, ammonia, phenol, tannins, soy protein, melamine, hexamine, sodium sulfate, sodium chloride, triacetin, tris(hydroxymethyl) nitromethane and chromium

compounds. N ote : Additives and scavengers may be used in combination with resin components to reduce formaldehyde emissions and enhance wood bonding. 

### Phenol **- Formaldehyde**  **(PF) R** **esins** PF resins are another major adhesive used in the CWP industry for products such as plywood, particle board, waferboard and fiberboard (CalEPA, 2007; EPA, 2011c). Phenol and formaldehyde are reactants in the synthesis of PF resins. The initial reaction of formaldehyde and phenol occurs with excess formaldehyde; therefore, phenol is the limitin g reagent and is expected to be consumed in the reaction ( EPA, 2011b)
. While most studies indicate that PF resins have low formaldehyde emissions, this is generally achieved at the latter stage of curing and adhesive formation (i.e., commercial/consumer use; downstream CWP manufacturing). Because the initial reaction occurs using an excess of formaldehyde, it is assumed that phenol exposure is negligible during downstream CWP commercial/consumer use and manufacturing ( EPA, 2011b; EPA, 2011c). Inhalation and dermal exposure to phenol and formaldehyde may occur during the synthetic process of the resin and CWP manufacturing . For instance, workers are expected to breathe phenol during various activities performed during PF resin manufacturing ( e.g., fillin g, transfer, sampling, drumming, cleaning, maintenance and repair work). Dermal exposures are also possible, but workers usually wear PPE due to phenol’s corrosive properties (EPA, 2011b; EPA, 2011c; EPA, 2011d)
.13 | Page

Table 3 summarizes the potential exposu res to formaldehyde and phenol during the life cycle process of PF
- bonded CWPs. **Table 3**  **. Formaldehyde and P**  **henol E** **xposure s**  **in the L** **ife C** **ycle of PF**  **- B**  **onded CWPs**  **Chemical substance of Concern**  **Life Cycle Stage PF**  **resin manufacturing**  **CWP**

**manufacturing Downstream product** 

**manufacturing Commercial and**  **Consumer Use** Formaldehyde Inhalation and

dermal exposure s are expected
. Inhalation and

dermal exposure s are expected
. Inhalation exposure is

expected, but lower emissions are also expected relative to UF . Inhalation exposure

is expected, but lower emissions are also expected relative to UF
. Phenol Inhalation exposure

is expected. D ermal exposure is possible. Inhalation

exposure is expected. Dermal ex posure is possible. Negligible inhalation

and dermal exposure s are expected
. Negligible inhalation and dermal exposure s are expected
. Note: The use of CWPs in office and residential building is an example of commercial/consumer use . Phenol (CAS RN: 108
- 95
- 2) is corrosive to the eyes, skin and respiratory tract (IPCS, 2001 ; OECD , 2004 b )
. Absorption is high through the lung, skin and GI tract (IPCS, 2001 ; OECD , 2004 b ; IARC, 1989)
. Phenol is not expected to be a dermal sensitizer (OECD , 2004)
. Acute dermal toxicity is moderate, and acute inhalation toxicity is uncertain due to a lack of studies (OECD , 2004 b ; EPA, 2002)
. The systemic effects of dermal and inhalation exposure s may be widespread and include liver and kidney toxicity, as well as cardiovascular effects and neurotoxicity ( EPA, 2002 ; ATSDR, 2008)
. Inhalation exposure is expected to adversely affect the respiratory system (ATSD R, 2008)
. There is uncertain concern for developmental and reproductive toxicity via the dermal and inhalation routes, although reproductive and developmental effects have been observed at high concentrations in oral exposures (ATSDR, 2008). There is concern for genotoxicity. Although phenol has shown little evidence of mutagenic properties in bacteri al tests, it has demonstrated mutagenicity and clastogenicity in testing with mammalian cells in vitro (OECD , 2004 b ; IARC, 1989 ; ATSDR, 2008)
. There are mixed results for testing in vivo, including some positive results for the induction of chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei in mice (ATSDR, 2008)
. The carcinogenicity of phenol is uncertain ( i.e., phenol is considered non
- classifiable as to its carcinogenicity in humans) (IARC, 1989) ; however, dermally
- applied phenol is a cancer promoter (OECD , 2004 b ). There is concern for neurotoxicity, with effects including convulsions, loss of coordination, reduced motor activity and paralysis (OECD , 2004 b )
. Health concerns for phenol
- related adverse effects are expected to be minimal during the late stages of the life cycle (e.g., commercial/consumer use; downstream product manufacturing) because individuals are not likely to come in contact with phenol (EPA, 2011c) . CWPs made with PF resins usually have 90% less formaldehyde emissions than CWPs made with UF r esins (HBN , 2008) . A 90% reduction in formaldehyde emissions means that the likelihood of adverse health effects is dramatically reduced for the later stages of the CWP’s life cycle (i.e., commercial/consumer use; downstream manufacturing).14 | Page

As i n the case of formaldehyde, the range of toxic effect s for phenol makes it a chemical of concern in the occupational setting. Workers repeatedly exposed to both phenol and formaldehyde may be more vulnerable to adverse effects when working in the manufactu ring process of PF resins and CWPs especially if exposures occur in the absence of PPE
. 

### Methylene diph **enyl diisocyanate (MDI) resins** Isocyanate
- based resins have a rapid polymerization and, because isocyanate s have high reactivity and efficiency in bondi ng, they can react with many other monomers, allowing a great flexibility in the production of various types of isocyanate
- based resins . For example, a mixture of aromatic monomer MDI and the associated methylene
- bridged polymeric MDI (pMDI) is used as an adhesive for CWPs such as oriented strand board, particle board and medium
density fiberboard (Frihart, 2005 ; EPA, 2011b ; EPA, 2011c). MDI and pMDI are produced from raw materials such as formaldehyde (HBN , 2008). The synthesis of MDI/ pMDI resins requires MDI and water to start the polymerization process. The isocyanate group reacts with water to form an unstable carbamic acid which is subsequently converted to an amine. Subsequently, self
- pol y merization rapidly occurs resulti ng in an oligomeric homopolymer. The polarity, viscocity and molecular weight of MDI/pMDI resins are low when compared to other wood adhesives and these properties cause them to rapidly penetrate t he wood surface ( Frihart, 2005; EPA, 2011b). Inhalation and dermal exposure s to MDI/pMDI are not expected during the use of MDI/pMDI

bonded CWPs (i.e. , commercial/consumer use; downstream product manufacturing) due to the rapid reacti vity of the isocyanate groups 2 ( Frihart, 2005 ; EPA, 2011 c ) (Table 4). In the occupational setting, t he synthesis of the resin is typically done in a closed system to avoid unn ecessary exposures to workers. Volatility of the MDI/pMDI resins is low and , although the resin is produced in a closed system, occupational ex posures (inhalation and dermal) may occur during worker activities at the manufacturing stage of the MDI/pMDI resin s (e.g. , sampling; equipment cleaning; accidental spill cleanup) or during the primary manufacturing of CWPs (e.g. , spraying; volatilization in hot pressing operations) (Table 4) ( EPA, 2011b ; EPA, 2011c; Pizzi and Mittal , 2003 ). In addition, exposure s are mitigated if PPE is regularly used in the workplace ( EPA, 2011c; Frihart, 2005).

2 In April 2011, EPA issued an Action Plan addressing the use of MDI and related compounds in products that may result from exposures to the consumer or self
- employed worker while using products containing uncured (unreacted) diisocyanates (e.g., spray applied foam sealants, adhesives, and coatings) or incidental exposures to the general population while such products are used in or around buildings including homes or schools (EPA, 2011e). The Action Plan did not focus on MDI use in CPWs; therefore, the information cited in this document comes from EPA’s report entitled “ Occupational and consumer exposure and environmental release assessment of formaldehyde in urea
-

formaldehyde resin manufacture and of certain chemicals for substitute technologies to reduce emissions from composite wood products” (EPA, 2011c), which concluded that the use of MDI resins in CWPs is not expected to result in consumer or general population exposure
.15 | Page

**Table 4**  **. MDI /pMDI E** **xposure in the L** **ife C** **ycle of MDI/pMDI -**  **B onded CWPs**  **Chemical substance of Concern**  **Life Cycle Stage**

**MDI/pMDI resin**  **manufacturing CWP** 

**manufacturing Downstream product** 

**manufacturing Commercial and**  **Consumer Use** MDI/pDMI Inhalation and

dermal exposure s are expected
. Inhalation and

dermal exposure s are expected
. Inhalation and dermal

exposure s are expected to be negligible
. Inhalation and

dermal exposure s are expected to be negligible. Note: The use of CWPs in office and residential building is an example of commercial/consumer use . Unlike UF resins, MDI/pMDI resins are formaldehyde
-free adhesive s, meaning that MDI/ pMDI
bonded CWPs do not release formaldehyde at any stage of the life cycle. However, i socyanate compounds are potentially toxic, especially in the absence of adequate industrial hygiene practices (e.g. , emission control technology such as closed systems and PPE )
. MDI (CAS RN: 101
- 68
- 8) exposure is a leadi ng cause of occup ational asthma and can result in irritation to the skin, eyes and respiratory tract (EPA, 1998 a ; IARC, 1999 a ; HSDB, 2010 a ; OECD , 2003). Lung absorption is expected to be good, but absorption is poor via the dermal route ( EPA, 1998 a )
. MDI is acutely toxic when inhaled, but acute dermal toxicity is low; MDI has dermal sensitizing potential and is a known respiratory sensitizer in humans ( EPA, 1998 a ; HSDB, 2010 a ; OECD , 2003)
. Repeated inhalation exposure to MDI aerosols may result in adverse effects in the respiratory tract ( EPA, 1998 a ; HSDB, 2010 a ; OECD, 2003)
. Moreover, there is evidence for genotoxicity based on observations of DNA damage, formation of DNA adducts, mixed results in bacterial reverse mutation assays, and induction of chromosomal aberrations in vitro ( EPA, 1998 a )
. T here is no conclusive evidence for carcinogenicity, although chronic inhalation exposure in anima ls has been shown to increase the incidence of benign tumors (OECD , 2003 ; EPA, 1998 a ; IARC, 1999 a )
. However, 4,4’
- methylenedianiline (MDA), which is a metabolite/reaction product of MDI and formed during the first steps of the synthesis of MDI/pMDI resins, is classified as a known carcinogen ( EPA, 1998 a ). 

### Polyvinyl alcohol

**/polyvinyl acetate (PVA) resins**  Polyvinyl alcohol/polyvinyl acetate (PVA) resins are thermoplastic adhesives used in the assembly of CWPs such as HWPW. The bonding process of PVA resins basically involves softening or melting the polymer while in contact with the panels and allowing the joined structure to cool. PVA resins are generally synthesized through polymerizatio n of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM )
. Small amounts of residual VAM (< 1%) are generally present in the PVA resins. The majority of PVA resins use polyvinyl alcohol as the main protective colloid and thickener (EPA, 2011b ; EPA, 2011c; Pizzi and Mittal , 2003). As with MDI resins, PVA resins are formaldehyde
-free adhesives and, therefore, the resins do not release formaldehyde in the bonded products. The moisture content of the wood, alcohol groups in the wood and the adhesive formulation components should provide sufficient reactants to consume any unreacted VAM, making it unlikely that the CWPs would contain the unreacted monomer. Therefore, negligible inhalation exposure is expected during commercial/consumer use, downstream product manufacturing and CWP manufacturing (Table 5 ; EPA, 2011c ).16 | Page

However, VAM ( CAS RN: 108
-0 5
-4) is an occupational hazard for those involved in the manufacture of PVA resin. B ecause of VAM’s volatility, w orkers may breathe VA M during the synthesis of the PVA resins ( EPA, 2011c; Table 5)
. Dermal exposures may also occur in the workplace during PVA resin manufacturing (EPA, 2011c)
. Repeated inhalation exposure may result in absorption of harmful amounts of VAM through the lungs. Workers may complain of eye and upper respiratory tract irritation (ATSDR, 1992 ; ECB, 2000b ; IARC, 1995 ; HSDB, 2009 )
. Nasal irritation, labored breathing, lung damage and convulsions have been observed in rodents acutely exposed to high levels of VAM by inhalation ( ATSDR, 1992 ; HSDB, 2009)
. Furthermore, rodents repeatedly exposed to VAM via inhalation have deve loped lung congestion and respiratory tract irritation, including respiratory distress, nasal mucosal metaplasia, tracheal metaplasia, bronchitis or bronchiolitis ( ECB, 2000b ; IARC, 1995). Carcinogenic effects have been observed in rats via the inhalation route (nasal carcinomas) , but there is inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity in humans (ATSDR, 1992 ; HSDB, 20 09 ). However, VAM is rapidly metabolized in human blood and animal tissues to acetaldehyde, which is both genotoxic and carcinogenic (IAR C, 1995 ). Hazards can be mitigated by conforming to good industrial hygiene practices (e.g., PPE). **Table 5**  **. Vinyl acetate monomer exposure in the life cycle of PVA -**  **bonded CWPs Chemical substance**  **of Concern Life Cycle Stage** 

**PVA resin**  **manufacturing CWP** 

**manufacturing Downstream product** 

**manufacturing Commercial and**  **Consumer Use** Vinyl acetate monomer Inhalation and

dermal exposure s are expected
. Inhalation and

dermal exposure s are expected to be negligible
. Inhalation and dermal

exposure s are expected to be negligible
. Inhalation and

dermal exposure s are expected to be negligible. Note: The use of CWPs in office and residential building is an example of commercial/consumer use . 

### Bio**- Based Adhesives**  Jones (2007) defines bio
- derived resins as “materials of natural, non
-mineral or non
-petroleum based origin that can be used either in their natural state or after small modification, capable of reproducing the behavior and performance of synthetic resins”. The application of natural products as binding agents date s back to before the beginning of human civilization. Archaeological evidence of the earliest known use suggests that Neanderthals were creating adhesives from birch bark more than 200,000 years ago (Roebroeks and V illa , 2011)
. Starch, blood and collagen extracts from animal sources (Lambuth , 2003), as well as natural gums and plant resins, are among the identified sources of binding agents used by early civilizations
. More recently, isolated vegetable proteins have been used in certain adhe sives . Resin durability has been a problem for bio
- based adhesives, especially under wet conditions, but some resins have been recently designed to have a longer adhesive working life and better performance under high moisture c onditions (Pizzi and Mittal , 2003). There has been an increased interest in these “green” adhesives because their production is based on renewable plant materials. However, resins produced with bio
- based adhesives for use in CWPs are generally combined with formaldehyde
- based resins and therefore still release some formaldehyde
.17 | Page

This report discusses resins derived from tannins, soy protein and CNSL, as they have been identified as alternatives to UF resins in the manufacture of CWPs.

**— Tannin** **- containing**  **r**

**esins** Tannin adhesives are natural resins that are mainly phenolic in nature and can be used in the production of CWPs (Cal EPA, 2007 ; EPA, 2011b). Tannins can also be used as wood additives ( EPA, 2011b). Tannin
- containing re sins are similar to PF resins, with tannins substituting for phenol. These resins have lower formaldehyde emissions than UF resins since less formaldehyde is used in the initial tannin
-formaldehyde reaction (Pizzi and Mittal , 2003)
. However, tannin
- containing resins are more expensive to produce. In general, tannins have low toxicity (ECB, 2000a); therefore, there is a low concern for health effects in workers handling tannin extracts during the manufacture of tannin
- bonded CWPs. Methanol c an be used in the produ ction of CWPs containing tannin
- based adhesives. Methanol is added to tannin formulations to achieve a slower curing process and lengthen a product’s shelf life. Residual methanol is expected to be consumed during wood processing d ue to its high volatility (EPA, 2011b)
. Although methanol is volatile, exposure will be negligible for commercial/consumer use and downstream product manufacturing processes. Dermal exposure is also expected to be negligible during commercial/consumer us e and product manufacturing, although it is possible during CWP and resin manufacturing ( EPA, 2011c; Table 6)
. **Table 6**  **. Methanol exposure in the life cycle of tannin -**  **bonded CWPs Chemical substance**  **of Concern Life Cycle Stage** 

**Tannin -** **containing resin**  **manufacturing CWP** 

**manufacturing Downstream product** 

**manufacturing Commercial and**  **Consumer Use**
Methanol Inhalation and

dermal exposure s are expected
. Inhalation and

dermal exposure s are expected
. Inhalation and dermal

exposure s are expected to be negligible
. Inhalation and

dermal exposure s are expected to be negligible. Note: The use of CWPs in office and residential building is an example of commercial/consumer use . As in UF resins that use methanol in UF manufacturing, the application of methanol in the manufacturing of tannin adhesives and tannin
- bonded CWPs is not expected to produce adverse health effects in individuals coming into contact with tannin
- bonded CWPs during downstream stages of the life cycle. However, methanol used in the manufacturing of tannin adhesives and tannin
- bonded CWPs does constitute an occupational hazard concern. Occupational exposures to methanol may produce eye, skin and nasal irritation ( OECD, 2004a ; CalEPA, 2000 ; HSDB, 2011). Similarly, there is evidence for numerous toxic effects including neurotoxicity, hepatic and renal effects, immunotoxicity, ocular toxicity, developmental toxicity and carcinogenicity (NAC, 2005 ; Cal EPA, 2000; OECD, 2004a ; HSDB, 2011). As with UF resins, h ealth effects may occur in workers repeatedly exposed to methanol during the manufacturing of tannin adhesives and tannin
- bonded CWPs, especially in the absence of PPE
.18 | Page

**— Polyami** **de epichlorohydrin (PAE)/soy**  **resins** PureBond is a formaldehyde
-free, soy- based adhesive sold by Columbia Forest Product s used in the manufacture of HWPW. The adhesive is produced by coupling polyamide
- epichlorohydrin (PAE) pre
- polymer with soy protein obtained from soy flour ( EPA, 2011b)
. Compared to the hazards of form aldehyde, soy protein has low toxicity properties. However, h umans may exhibit a llergic reactions, including a sthma, when breathing soy flour or soybean dust . Similarly, skin exposure to soy flour or dust may result in dermal allergies (Gomez
- Olles et al. , 2007). Epichlorohydrin is an intermediate chemical used in the manufacture of PAE ( EPA, 2011b). Epichlorohydrin is expected to be fully consumed in the chemical reaction making PAE; therefore, it is assumed that occupational exposures to epichlorohydrin will be negligible during all downstream processes after PAE resin production including the formulation of PureBond, the use of PureBond in HWPW manufacturing, and the subsequent downstream and commercial use of the products ( EPA, 2011c) (Table 7). Consequently, these downstream stages of the life cycle do not constitute a hazard concern for humans. However, epichlorohydrin could be a serious inhalation and dermal health hazard to individuals working in the manufacture of PAE (e.g. , unload ing of the ep ichlorohydrin into the reactor; reaction sampling) in the absence of good industrial hygiene practices (e.g., PPE) ( EPA, 2011c) (Table 7)
. Epichlorohydrin ( CAS RN: 106
- 89
- 8 ) is highly toxic to humans by inhalation and skin absorption (Vincoli , 1997)
. Inhalation exposure results in moderate to severe irritation to the eyes (burns can lead to permanent damage to vision), nose, throat and respiratory tract ( EPA, 2009 a ; OECD , 2006)
. This chemical is a known sensitizer via inhalation and dermal absorption (may produce eczema or dermatitis) (OECD , 2006 ; Vincoli , 1997)
. Repeated
- dose inhalation may result in kidney effects and changes in nasal turbinates and a range of other symptoms, including headache, nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort and pain in the liver region, breathing difficulties, cyanosis, coughing, and chemical pneuomonitis or pulmonary edema (IARC, 1999b ; EPA, 2009 a ; OECD , 2006 ; Vincoli , 1997)
. High concentrations may cause depression and injury to the central nervous system (i.e., tremors ; somnolence ; ataxia), potentially leading to death (Vincoli , 1997)
. There is high concern for reproductive toxicity and the chemical is also a suspected teratogen (Vincoli , 1997)
. Epichlorohydrin is mutagenic and is carcinogenic in test animals via the inhalation route. EPA has classified epichlorohydrin as a probable human carcinogen ( EPA, 2009a).19 | Page

**Table 7**  **. Epichlorohydrin exposure in the life cycle of PAE/soy -**  **bonded CWPs Chemical substance**  **of Concern**  **Life Cycle Stage**

**PAE/soy resin**  **manufacturing CWP** 

**manufacturing Downstream product** 

**manufacturing Commercial and**  **Consumer Use** Epichlorohydrin Inhalation and

dermal exposure s are expected
. Inhalation and

dermal exposure s are expected to be negligible
. Inhalation and dermal

exposure s are expected to be negligible
. Inhalation and

dermal exposure s are expected to be negligible. Note: The use of CWPs in office and residential building is an example of commercial/consumer use .

**— Cashew nut shell liquid**  **(CNSL) -** **based resins** Cashew nut shell liquid (CNSL) is a mixture of phenolic
- based compounds derived from the cashew nut. It contains approximately 70% anacardic acid , 18% cardol , 5% cardanol and 7% other phenols and less polar substances (HPV, 200 6a; HPV, 2006b )
. CNSL is used in the manufacture of natural, sustainable adhesives . However, as with tannin
- containing resins, CNSL resins are often combined with formaldehyde
- based resins for use in CWPs . Nonetheless, they are cons idered to be better alternatives to UF resins due to lower formaldehyde emissions (Kim , 2010)
. CNSL is less likely than UF to present a health hazard to the general population during commercial/consumer use due to negligible exposure to CNSL and formaldehyde at this life cycle stage. CNSL resin is also less likely than UF resin to present a health hazard to workers during downstream CWP manufacturing processes. Dermal exposure to CNSL is expected to be low during resin and CWP manufacturing and diminishes with the use of appropriate PPE. I nhalation exposures are not expected due to its low vapor pressure. CNSL is a strong skin sensitizer in animals and humans , as well as a severe eye and skin irritant (NICNAS, 1996 ; HPV, 2006a ; HPV, 2006b ; ECB, 2000c; EPA, 2009b ). CNSL is not associated with the vast array of serious adverse effects that have been reported for formaldehyde ( i.e . , lung irritation ; neurotoxicity; possible reproductive effects; cancer); therefore the hazard concern level for CNSL is low. 

### Melamine**- based resins**  Melamine formaldehyde (MF) resin s are thermosetting adhesive s made from melamine and formaldehyde by polymerization. These resins have a much higher resistance to water attack when compared to UF resins, but they are more expensive to make because of the high cost of the melamine . Because MF resins are expensive, urea is generally added to create melamine
urea -formaldehyde (MUF) resins, which are less expensive than MF resins but still retain acceptable water resistance (Pizzi and Mittal , 2003 ; Frihart, 2005). Melamine (CAS RN: 108
- 78
- 1) has low inhalation and dermal toxicity (IARC, 1999c; OECD , 2002b). One advantage of CWPs made out of m elamine
- based resins (e.g., MF , MUF) is the reduced amount of formaldehyde that is emitted from the product when compared to UF
bonded CWPs; therefore, low exposure to formaldehyde is expected during downstream life20 | Page

cycle stages (i.e., commercial/consumer use and during product manufacturing )
. Exposures to melamine and urea are also minimal during the production of CWPs and subsequent life cycle stages . Workers making MF and MUF resins are potentially exposed to melamine, urea and formaldehyde (e.g., while mixing the chemicals ) ( EPA, 2011c) especially in the absence of good industrial hygiene practices (e.g., PPE) . Melamine is not expected to be an occupational irritant and dermal sensitizer and urea has low toxicity. However, hazard concerns for formaldehyde are present during the manufacture of MF and MUF resins as well as MF
- and MUF
- bonded CWPs (e.g., application of the resin; press operations) where exposures to formaldehyde vapors are possible. Exposure to formaldehyde vapors is associated with various adverse health effects, includi ng cancer, in workers. 

### Scavengers and additives Various chemicals are used to minimize formaldehyde release from formaldehyde
- based resins. Formaldehyde scavengers can be added to resins or directly to wood panels. It is important to note that the action of scavengers may be reduced in the finished CWPs over time such that formaldehyde exposures may increase if the product is subjected to heat and humidity (Frihart et al., 2010)
. Additives are sometimes added to resin s or panels to enhance des irable properties (e.g. , panel strength ; water and mold protection ) ( Frihart, 2005)
. S cavengers and additives that may be added to the resin technologies discussed in this report are urea, ammonia, phenol, tannins, soy protein, melamine, hexamine, sodium sulfate, sodium chloride, triacetin, tris(hydroxymethyl) nitromethane and chromium compounds ( EPA, 2011a)
. It is expected that these scavengers and additives react with components of the resin and/or wood panel such that chemical releases are likely to be minimal after production of the bonded panels
. T herefore, e xposure to these chemicals is not expected during commercial/consumer use and downstream product manufacturing
. D ermal and inhalation exposures in the workplace are likely during resin manufacturing and production of CWPs. While m ost of these scavengers and additives have low toxicity ( e.g., urea, melamine, hexamine, sodium chloride, sodium sulfate, soy protein, tannins, triacetin [ glycerol triacet ate ] and tris [ hydroxymethyl ] nitromethane) , t here is a concern for occupational hazards to ammonia, phenol and chromium (III) salts
. W ood
- based panels can be treated in special chambers with a nitrogen
- conta ining formaldehyde scavenger, suc h as amm onia (CAS RN: 7664
-41
- 7)
. Ammonia can cause severe irritation and burning to the skin, eyes, oral cavity and respiratory tract ( particularly mucous surfaces ) immediately upon contact due to the rapid conversion of ammonia to ammonium hydroxide, which is very caustic . Inhalation at high concentrations can cause pulmonary edema and reduced pulmonary function (ATSDR, 2004 ; NRC, 2008b ; OECD , 2007 ; ECB, 2000d). However, a mmonia exposures are not expected to be significant during commercial/consumer use and down stream product manufacture. Although nitrogen
- based scavenger additives (e.g.,21 | Page

ammonia) with low molecular weight have high volatility in their neat form and may have the potential to diffuse from the wood matrix in the final product, once the additives react with formaldehyde, as intended, the corresponding adducts are likely to bind irreversibly to the wood chemical moieties
. Therefore, exposures of residual ammonia are expected to be negligible for these life cycle stages ( EPA, 2010b ; EPA, 2011c). A mmonia does constitute an occupational hazard due to its corrosivity and irritant properties. Because the CWPs are usually sprayed with ammonia in a closed system, workers are unlikely to be exposed to high concentrations of ammonia gas via inhalation. However, some ammonia may remain in the treated panels and, due to its high volatility, workers may be exposed by inhalation
. Dermal exposure is unlikely to be a significant exposure route. In the absence of a closed system and PPE, inhalation exposure t o ammonia is expected in the workplace. Chromium (III) salts (e.g. , chromium nitrate) are used as additi ves in PVA resins to improve water resistance. Exposures are not expected during commercial/consumer use and downstream manufacturing. However, Cr (III) ions are present in treated panels and have the theoretical ability to leach out. While there is no evidence that such leaching or migration occurs, if the Cr (III) salt were to leach out, it could potentially convert to the Cr (VI) oxidation state (hexavalent chromium) ( EPA, 2011b ; EPA, 2011c ). Under this unlikely scenario, h exavalent chromium salts would constitute a prime health hazard. EPA has classified chromium (VI) as a known human carcinogen by the inhalation route ( EPA, 1998b). Chromium (III) nitrate solution is not expected to be volatile. Therefore, o nly dermal exposures are likely during resin and CWP manufacturing
. Chromium allergic dermatitis is the major immunological effect of chromium (III) and is typically elicited by dermal co ntact in sensitized individuals; however, initial sensitization may result from inhalation, oral or dermal exposure or from a combination of these exposure routes ( Langård , 2001)
. Phenol can also be included in the category of scavengers and additives. Once reacted, phenol is not expected to be released during commercial/consumer use and downstream product manufacturing. However, p henol constitutes an occupational hazard due to its corrosive properties as well as its adverse effects in the respiratory tract (IPCS, 2001 ; OECD , 2004 b ). GI effects and liver toxicity have also been reported in chronically exposed humans (ATSDR, 2008). T here is a concern for worker inhalation and dermal exposure s to phenol when used as an additive to CWPs at the upstream stages of the life cycle (i.e. , resin and CWP manufacturing).22 | Page



## C**ONCLUSIONS** UF resins are one of the most common adhesives use d in the CWP industry. These adhesives have good bonding properties and are inexpensive to ma nufacture , but they are a source of formaldehyde emissions. CWPs made with UF resins typically release formaldehyde during the life of the product, but the rate of release is highest right after CWPs are manufactured and decreases rapidly after the first few month s, reaching background levels in a few years. Formaldehyde constitutes a human health hazard for workers manufacturing UF resins and CWPs, as well as for office workers and general population that spend most of their time in office building s or residential units containing UF
- bonded CWPs. Sensory irritation is the most frequently reported health symptom and it usually disappears once the person is removed from the source of exposure. Individuals with respiratory problems (e.g. , asthma , resp iratory allergies ) are likely to be more sensitive to formaldehyde and their symptoms may worsen during exposure. Formaldehyde is a respiratory carcinogen and may also cause neurological and reproductive effects. Formaldehyde’s serious adverse effects in humans have contributed to the existing efforts to reduce or eliminate formaldehyde emissions from CWPs, including the development of new alternative resin technologies, which we re discussed in this report. T he alternative resin s evaluated in this report release either no formaldehyde or lower levels of formaldehyde than UF resins as a result of reformulating the resin polymer, scavenging excess formaldehyde during polymer production with various chemicals or a combination of both
. Reductions in formal dehyde emissions translate into reduced hazards for workers and the general population using CWPs that have been bonded with alternative resins, especially during the late stages of the product life cycle (e.g. , downstream product manufacturing and commerc ial/consumer use). H ealth concerns exist for workers involved in the initial stages of the life cycle where the production of polymers (resin) and the manufacturing of the bonded panels take place. Formaldehyde, phenol, MDI, VAM , methanol, epichlorohydrin and ammonia are all resin components of concern . Heating of products containing resins increases the potential for worker exposures because it raises the vapor pressure of chemicals during hot pressing operations. In addition, many hot pressing methods cause other chemicals to be entrained in the steam from the presses. Health impacts from these chemical substances are reduced when feasible engineering and work practice controls ( e.g., PPE) are available at the workplace.23 | Page



## R **EFERENCES** ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 1992 . Toxicological p rofile for v inyl Acetate . U.S. Public Health Service. Online access: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/t oxprofiles/tp59.pdf ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 1999. Toxicological p rofile for formaldehyde . U.S. Public Health Service. Online access: http://www. atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=220&tid=39 ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substa nces and Disease Registry). 2004 . Toxicological p rofile for a mmonia . U.S. Public Health Service. Online access: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp126.pdf ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substa nces and Disease Registry). 2008 . Toxicological p rofile for p henol . U.S. Public Health Service. Online access: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=220&tid=39 ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substa nces and Disease Registry). 2010
. Addendum to the t oxicological p rofile for formaldehyde . U.S. Public Health Service. Online access: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=220&tid=39 CalEPA ( California Environmental P rotection Agency) . 2000 . Determination of n on - cancer c hronic reference e xposure l evels for m ethanol . Online access: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/2008/AppendixD3_final.pdf#page=354 CalEPA ( California Environmental Protection Agency ) . 2007. Initial statement of reasons for p roposed r ulemaking p ublic h earing t o c onsider a doption of t he p roposed Airborne Toxic Control Measure t o reduce formaldehyde e missions f rom c omposite wood p roducts. Air Resources Board Staff Report. Online access: http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2007/compwood07/isor.pdf ECB (European Chemicals Bureau). 2000 a . International Uniform Chemical Information Database (IUCLID) for t annins. European Commission. ECB (European Chemicals Bureau). 2000b. International Uniform Chemical Information Database (IUCLID) for v inyl a cetate m onomer (CAS RN: 108
- 05
-4). European Commission. ECB (European Chemicals Bureau). 2000c. International Uniform Chemical Information Database (IUCLID) for c ashew n utshell l iq uid
. European Commission. ECB (European Chemicals Bureau). 2000d. International Uniform Chemical Information Database (IUCLID) for a mmonia. European Commission.24 | Page

EPA (E nviro nmental Protection Agency). 1991 . Integrated Risk Information System: formaldehyde (CASRN 50
- 00
- 0 )
. Office of Research and Development. Online access : http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0419.htm EPA (Enviro nmental Protection Agency). 1998 a . Integrated Risk Information System: m ethylene d iphenyl d iisocyanate (monomeric MDI) and polymeric MD I (p MDI) ( CAS RNs: 101
- 68
- 8, 9016
- 87
- 9). Office of Research and Development. Online access : http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0529.htm EPA (Enviro nmental Protection Agency). 1998b . Toxicological review of h exavalent chromium , in support of summary information on the Integrated Risk Information Sy stem (IRIS). Office of Research and Development. Online access : http://www.epa.gov/iris/toxreviews/0144tr.pdf#page=53 EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2002. Toxicological review of p henol, in support of summary information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Offi ce of Research and Development. Online access : http://www.epa.gov/iris/toxreviews/0088tr.pdf EPA (Enviro nmental Protection Agency). 2009 a . Integrated Risk Information System: e pichlorohydrin (CASRN 106
- 89
- 8). Office of Research and Development. Online access : http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0050.htm EPA (Enviro nmental Protection Agency). 2009b
. Screening
- Level Hazard Characterization for Cashew, Nutshell Liquid (CASRN 8007
- 24
- 7). Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Online access: http://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/hpvis/hazchar/8007

- 24
- 7_cashew%20nut%20oil_December2009.pdf EPA (Enviro nmental Protection Agency). 2010
. Toxicological review of fo rmaldehyde i nhalation a ssessment (CAS No. 50
-00
- 0 ). Office of Research and Development. Draft document, June 2010. Online access : http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris_drafts/recordisplay.cfm?deid=223614 EPA (Enviro nmental Protection Agency). 2011a
. List of urea
-formaldehyde resin substitutes
. Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, February 2011. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2011 b . Chemistry report analyzing the substitutes for urea -formaldehyde resins to reduce emissions from composite wood products. Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, July 2011. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2011 c . Occupational and cons umer exposure and environmental release assessment of formaldehyde in urea
-formaldehyde resin manufacture and of certain chemicals for substitute technologies to reduce emissions from composite wood products
. Prepared for the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics by Eastern Research Group, Inc., August 4, 2011.25 | Page

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2011 d
. Assessment of occupational exposure to formaldehyde from composite wood products
. Prepared for the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics by Eastern Research Group, Inc., July 28, 2011. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2011 e . Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) and related compounds action plan [RIN 2070
- ZA15]. Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, April 2011. Online access: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/mdi.html Frihart, C.R. 2005. Wood adhesion and adhesives. In: Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composites, Rowell, R.M. (Editor), CRC Press, pages 215
- 278. Frihart, C.R., Wescott, J.M., Birkland, M.J., and Gonner, K. M. 2010. Formaldehyde emission from ULEF0 and NAF
- bonded commercial hardwood plywood as influenced by temperature and rel ative humidity. Proceedings of the International Convention of Society of Wood Science and Technology and United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva, Switzerland. Online access: http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/pdf2010/fpl_2010_frihart005.pdf Gomez
- Olles, S., Cruz, M.J., Bogdanovic, J., Wouters, I.M., Doekes, G., Sander, I., Morell, F., and Rodrigo, M.J. 2007. Assessment of Soy Aeroallergen Levels in Different Work Environments. Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 37 : 1863
- 1872. HBN (Healthy Building Network). 2008. Fact sheet: Alternative resin binders for particle board, medium density fiberboard (MDF) and wheatboard. Online access: http://www.healthybuilding.net/healthcare/2008

- 04
- 10_alt_resin_binders_particleboard.pdf HPV ( High Producti on Volume Challenge ) . 200 6a . Revised test plan for cashew nut shell liquid (CAS No. 8007
- 24
- 7). Test plan submitted to EPA by Cardolite Corporation. Online access: http://www.epa.gov/hpv/pubs/summaries/casntliq/c13793tc.htm HPV ( High Production Volume Challenge ) . 2006b. Revised robust s ummaries for c ashew n ut s hell l iquid (Final Revision). Online access: http://www.epa.gov/hpv/pubs/summaries/casntliq/c13793tc.htm HSDB ( Hazardous Substances Databank). 2009
. Vinyl Acetate (CAS RN: 108
- 05
-4)
. U nited States National Library of Medicine. Online access: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi

bin/sis/htmlgen?HSDB HSDB ( Hazardous Substances Databank). 2010
. MDI (CAS RN: 101
- 68
- 8)
. U nited States National Library of Medicine. Online access: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi

- bin/sis/htmlgen?HSDB HSDB (H azard Substances Database). 2011. Methanol. US National Library of Medicine. Online access: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi

- bin/sis/htmlgen?HSDB26 | Page

IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 1989. Monograph on p henol. Online access: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol71/mono71

- 33.pdf IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 1995. Monograph on v inyl a cetate, volume 63. Online access: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol63/volume63.pdf IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 1999 a . Monograph on 4,4’
- methylenediphenyl diisocyanate and polymeric 4,4’
- methylenediphenyl diisocyanate. Online access: http://m onographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol71/mono71

-47.pdf IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 1999 b . Monograph on e pichlorohydrin, volume 71. Online access: http://mon ographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol71/volume71.pdf IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 1999c. Monograph on m elamine, volume 73. Online access: http://monographs.i arc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol73/mono73

- 17.pdf IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 2006. Mo nograph on formaldehyde , volume 88
. Online access: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/PDFs/index.php ICSC ( Inte rnational Chemical Safety Cards). 1997. Chemical safety card for urea. Online access: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0595.html IPCS (International Program on Chemical Safety) INCHEM . 2001. Phenol. Online access: http://www.inchem.org/documents/pims/chemical/pim412.htm IPCS (International Program on Chemical Safety) INCHEM. 2010. Urea. WHO Food Additives Series 32. Online access: http://www.inchem.org/documents/jecfa/jecmono/v32je16.htm Kim, S. 2010. The reduction of fo rmaldehyde and VOCs emission from wood
- based flooring by green adhesive using cashew nut shell liquid (CNSL). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 182: 919
- 922. Lambuth, A.L. 2003. Protein adhesives for wood. In: Handbook of Adhesive Technology, 2 nd Edition, Pizzi, A. and K.L. Mittal (Eds.), CRC Press. Langård, S. 2001. Chromium, molybdenum, and tungsten. In: Patty’s Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. John Wiley and Sons. NAC (National Advisory Committee ). 2005 . Interim Acute E xposure Guideline Levels (AEGL) for m ethanol
. Online access: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/aegl/pubs/methanol_interim4_february2005_c.pdf NAC (National Advisory Com mittee ). 2008 . Interim Acute E xposure Guideline Levels (AEGL) for formaldehyde
. Online access : http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/aegl/pubs/results68.htm27 | Page

NRC ( National Research Council). 2008 a . Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentrations for s elected a irborne c ontaminants. Volume 5: c hapter on formaldehyde . Washington, DC: National Academ ies Press. Online access: http://www.na p.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12529 NRC (National Research Council). 2008 b . Final Acute E xposure Guideline Levels (AEGL) for a mmonia, volume 6
. Online access: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12018.html N RC (National Research Council). 2011. Review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s IRIS assessment of formaldehyde. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Online access: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13142 NICNAS ( National Industrial Chemicals Notificatio n and Assessment Scheme)
. 1996. Full p ublic report on CNSL resin 158006. Online access: http://www.nicnas.gov.au/publications/car/new/na/nafullr/na0200fr/na292fr.pdf NTP (National Toxicology Program). 201 1 . R eport o n carcinogen , 12th edition : Substance profile for formaldehyde. Department of Heal th and Human Service s. Online a ccess: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/roc12 OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2002 a . Summary initial report (SIAR) for urea. UNEP Publications. Online access: http://www.chem.unep.ch/irptc/sids/OECDSIDS/57136.pdf OECD (Organization for Economic Coo peration and Development). 2002b
. Screening Information Dataset ( SIDS ) Initial Assessment Profile : m elamine. Online access: http://www.inchem.org/documents/sids/sids/108781.pdf OECD (Organization for Economic Coo peration and Development). 2003
. Screening Information Dataset ( SIDS ) Initial Assessment Profile: m ethylenediphenl diisocyanate (MDI ). OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2004a. Screening Information Dataset (SIDS) Initial Assessment Profile: m ethanol. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperatio n and Development). 2004 b
. Screening Information Dataset ( SIDS ) Initial Assessment Profile: p henol. OECD (Organization for Economic Coo peration and Development). 2006
. Screening Information Dataset ( SIDS ) Initial Assessment Profile: e pichlorohydrin (1
- Chloro
- 2,3,
- epoxypropane). OECD (Organization for Economic Coo peration and Development). 2007
. Screening Information Dataset ( SIDS ) Initial Assessment Profile: a mmonia.28 | Page

Pizzi, A. and Mittal , K.L. (Editors) . 2003. Handbook of Adhesive Technology, 2 nd e dition . CRC Press. Roebroeks, W. and Villa , P . 2011. On the earliest evidence for habitual use of fire in Europe. PNAS 108: 5209
- 5214. Online access: www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1018116108 Salthammer, T., Mentese , S. and Marutzy, R . 2010 . Formaldehyde in the indoor environment. Chemistry Reviews 110 (4): 2536
- 2572. Vincoli, J
. W. 1997. Risk m anagement for h azardous c hemicals, Volume 1. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.