alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 28, 2013

s0520

Order 

Clerk

May 28, 2013

146612

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146612

COA: 307155

Mecosta CC: 11-007163-FH

BRANDON MICHAEL IRELAND,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 11, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
1 The Court would like to express its appreciation to Craig

A. Lewis of Hogan & Hartson representing the Plaintiffs pro bono . FORMER EMPLOYEES OF HOLLISTER, INC., Plaintiffs,

v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendant. Slip Op. 05-40

United States Court of International Trade

Before: Pogue, Judge

Court No. 04-00262

JUDGMENT On February 1, 2 005, t he Court granted the United States Department of Labor’s Consent Motion for Voluntary Remand. On March 11, 2005, the Department of Labor filed a Notice of Determina tion finding that Plaintiffs were eligible to receive Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance under 19 U.S.C . § 2813 (2002). Both p arties agree that the Department of Labor’s Determination is in accordance with law, supported by substantial evidence on the record, and fully complies with the Court’s remand order. 1 Accordingly, having reviewed the Department of Labor’s Determination and all pleadings and papers on file herein, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the Department of Labor’s Determ inatio n is sustained.

/s/ Donald C. Pogue, Judge Dated: March 30, 2005 New York, New York
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6482

TREVELL ANTWON HARVEY, a/k/a Travell Antwon Harvey,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Elizabeth W. Hanes, Magistrate Judge. (3:21-cv-00304-EWH)

Submitted: September 29, 2023 Decided: November 15, 2023

Before GREGORY and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan P. Sheldon, SHELDON & FLOOD, PLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6482 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/15/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Trevell Antwon Harvey seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief 

on his amended 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition.*

 The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find 

the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harvey has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(c).

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6482 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/15/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
# C_2022427EN.01000601.xml

| 9.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/6

---

EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF VOCATIONAL TRAINING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2021

(2022/C 427/06)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/about-cedefop/finance-and-budget/annual-accounts

---
# C_2023139EN.01000401.xml

| 21.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/4

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.106390

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 139/03)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 31.3.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.106390 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Region | VLAAMS GEWEST |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCTF: Aid to undertakings facing increased energy costs following Russian aggression against Ukraine (amendments to SA.104588) |
| Legal basis | Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering tot toekenning van steun aan ondernemingen die worden geconfronteerd met stijgende energie-uitgaven ten gevolge van de Russische agressie tegen Oekraïne, wat betreft het eerste kwartaal van 2023 (Decision of the Flemish Government regarding the granting of aid to undertakings that are confronted with increased energy costs following the Russian aggression against Ukraine, regarding Q1 of 2023) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 125 000 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 125 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Agentschap Innoveren & Ondernemen (VLAIO) |
| Koning Albert II-laan 35, bus 12 |

Date of adoption of the decision

31.3.2023

Aid number

SA.106390

Member State

Belgium

Region

VLAAMS GEWEST

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCTF: Aid to undertakings facing increased energy costs following Russian aggression against Ukraine (amendments to SA.104588)

Legal basis

Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering tot toekenning van steun aan ondernemingen die worden geconfronteerd met stijgende energie-uitgaven ten gevolge van de Russische agressie tegen Oekraïne, wat betreft het eerste kwartaal van 2023 (Decision of the Flemish Government regarding the granting of aid to undertakings that are confronted with increased energy costs following the Russian aggression against Ukraine, regarding Q1 of 2023)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 125 000 000 EUR

Annual budget: 125 000 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Agentschap Innoveren & Ondernemen (VLAIO)

Koning Albert II-laan 35, bus 12

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,960
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (8,642)
<INVENTORY>                                     36,410
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,633
<PP&E>                                          15,655
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,603)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,879
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,898
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,857)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,571
<SALES>                                        355,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               355,010
<CGS>                                          316,830
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  316,830
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,609
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,429)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,577)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,852)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,852)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.68)
        

</TABLE>
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

55) ll-K- (B) -43 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:49 AM Sheet 55 of 325 
P.2 

-27 

II-K-(B)-43 

REVISIONS TO S02 AND PM CONTROL COSTS. 

Letter from M. Kelly, Radian to E. Medine, EEA. 

July 17, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-43
Order entered May 6, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01369-CR

No. 05-13-01370-CR

JEREMY DEANDRE TAYLOR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F07-60081-K, F07-60083-K

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s motion to order court reporter to file record.

We ORDER Janice Garrett, the official court reporter for Criminal District Court No. 4, 

to file a supplemental reporter’s record that contains the September 13, 2013 revocation hearing 

within FIFTEEN (15) DAYS from the date of this order.

We ORDER appellant to file the brief within FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS from the date 

of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 3(a)
                               
            THE PEOPLES GAS LIGHT AND COKE COMPANY

                   RESOLVED, That, effective as of
          the close of business on August 31, 1997,
          the By-Laws of the Company be, and they
          hereby are, amended by replacing Section
          3.1 of Article III of the By-Laws in its
          entirety with the following:
          
                          ARTICLE III
                   Directors and Committees

                   SECTION 3.1.   Number and
          Election.  The business and affairs of the
          Company shall be managed and controlled by
          a board of directors, five (5) in number,
          each of which shall be a shareholder.  The
          directors shall be elected by the
          shareholders entitled to vote at the annual
          meeting of such shareholders and each
          director shall be elected to serve for a
          term of one (1) year and thereafter until
          his successor shall be elected and shall
          qualify.  The Board of Directors may fill
          one or more vacancies arising between
          meetings of shareholders by reason of an
          increase in the number of directors or
          otherwise.
                   
                   RESOLVED FURTHER, That the
          Secretary of the Company be, and he hereby
          is, directed to initial a copy of the
          amended By-Laws presented at this meeting
          and place it with the important papers of
          this meeting.
# C_2022401EN.01000201.xml

| 18.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 401/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 401/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10826 – GOLDMAN SACHS / NORGINE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 401/02)

On 15 September 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10826. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10826. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

VICKIE RAY

, *

* No. 1 8

- 1452 V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: August 14, 2020

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; influenza (“flu”) vaccine;

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * SIRVA; shoulder injury.

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

David G. Rogers

, Rogers, Hofrichter & Karrh, LLC

, Fayetteville, GA , for

Petitioner;

Lynn C. Schlie , United S tates Dep ’ t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1

On A ugust 13, 2020

, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the

petition for compensation filed by Vickie Ray on September 21, 2018

. Petitioner

alleged that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine s he received on or around September 23,

2015, or October 20, 2016 , which is co ntained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

“Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), caused her to suffer from a shoulder injury related

to vaccination administration (“SIRVA”)

. P etitioner further alleges that s he

suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner

represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for

damages on her behalf as a result of her condition.

1 T he E

- Government Act

, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012 ) ( Federal Management and

Promotion of Electronic Government Services) , requires that the Court post this decision on its

website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing

redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4).

Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.2

Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to suffer from

SIRVA or any other i njury.

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The

undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the

Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum payment of $ 19,500 .00 in the form of a check payable to

petitioner

. T his amount represents compensation for all damages that

would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B,

the clerk is directed to enter judgment in cas e 1 8

- 1452 V according to this decision

and the attached stipulation. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED

.

s /Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each

party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal

Claims judge.
[Cite as State v. Sargent, 2020-Ohio-966.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 BUTLER COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, 

 Appellee, 

 - vs - 

DENNIS C. SARGENT, 

 Appellant. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

CASE NOS. CA2019-10-179 

 CA2019-10-180 

D E C I S I O N 

3/16/2020 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case Nos. CR2018-08-1571 and CR2019-03-0471 

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 

315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for appellee

Michele Temmel, 6 South Second Street, Suite 305, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for 

appellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by 

appellant, Dennis C. Sargent, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the 

transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common 

Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. 

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review 
Butler CA2019-10-179 

 CA2019-10-180 

 - 2 - 

of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court 

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be 

predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," 

Anders, at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record 

independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and 

without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to 

withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and 

(5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon 

appellant. 

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response 

having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error 

prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of 

counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is 

dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous. 

M. POWELL, P.J., S. POWELL and RINGLAND, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

    Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes and constitutes
Thomas E. Williams, and Anthony J. Allott, and each of them singly, his true and
lawful attorneys with full power to them, and each of them singly, to sign for
him and in his name in the capacities indicated below the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Applied Extrusion Technologies, Inc. for the fiscal year ended September
30, 1998, and any and all amendments to said Annual Report and to file the same,
with exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, and he
hereby ratifies and confirms his signature as it may be signed by said
attorneys, or any of them, to said Annual Report and any and all amendments
thereto.

Signature                  Capacity in Which Signed                Date



/s/ Amin J. Khoury         Chairman of the Board and          December 7, 1998
------------------------   Director                          
Amin J. Khoury

/s/ Thomas E. Williams     Director, President, and Chief     December 7, 1998
------------------------   Executive Officer (principal
Thomas E. Williams         executive officer)

/s/ Paul W. Marshall       Director                           December 7, 1998
------------------------
Paul W. Marshall

/s/ Richard G. Hamermesh   Director                           December 7, 1998
------------------------
Richard G. Hamermesh

/s/ Mark M. Harmeling      Director                           December 7, 1998
------------------------
Mark M. Harmeling

/s/ Nader A. Golestaneh    Director                           December 7, 1998
------------------------
Nader A. Golestaneh

/s/ Joseph J. O'Donnell    Director                           December 7, 1998
------------------------
Joseph J. O'Donnell
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 05/31 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2857 

To facilitate the addition of park administration at the Coltsville National 

Historical Park, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2015 

Mr. LARSON of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To facilitate the addition of park administration at the 

Coltsville National Historical Park, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO COLTSVILLE NATIONAL HIS4 TORICAL PARK DONATION SITE. 

5 Section 3032(b)(2)(B) of Public Law 113–291 (16 

6 U.S.C. 410qqq) is amended by striking ‘‘East Armory’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘Colt Armory Complex’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Original on Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. Letterhead



                CONSENT OF NETHERLAND SEWELL AND ASSOCIATES, INC.


         As oil and gas  consultants,  Netherland  Sewell and  Associates,  Inc.
hereby  consent  to: (a) the use of our  reserve  report  dated  March 16,  1999
entitled  "Estimate  of  Reserves  and  Future  Revenue to the Pease Oil and Gas
Company  Interest in Certain Oil and Gas  Properties  Located In  Louisiana  and
Texas as of January 1, 1999";  and (b) all references to our firm included in or
made a part of Pease Oil and Gas  Company's  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about March 31, 1999.


                                       NETHERLAND SEWELL AND ASSOCIATES, INC.



                                       By: /s/ Danny D. Simmons  
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Danny D. Simmons
                                       Senior Vice President


Houston, Texas
Date:March 30, 1999
# C_2022231EN.01001601.xml

| 15.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/16

---

Special report 13/2022

‘Free movement in the EU during the COVID-19 pandemic – Limited scrutiny of internal border controls, and uncoordinated actions by Member States’

(2022/C 231/06)

The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 13/2022: ‘Free movement in the EU during the COVID-19 pandemic – Limited scrutiny of internal border controls, and uncoordinated actions by Member States’.

The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=61240

---