alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023307EN.01001701.xml

| 31.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 307/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 307/17

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10862 – OLIN / MITSUI / BWA JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 307/02)

On 20 December 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10862. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10862. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TRENT FITZGERALD KING,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-0819

[February 29, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Edward H. Merrigan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 17-007819-

CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy,

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2022130EN.01001101.xml

| 23.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/11

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 130/09)

Decision granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2022) 1497 | 16 March 2022 | 4-(1,1,3,3-Tetra methylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated
  (4-tert-OPnEO)
  EC No: -, CAS No:- | Eli Lilly Kinsale Limited, Dunderrow, Kinsale, P17 NY71 Cork, Co. Cork Ireland | REACH/22/6/0 | Industrial use as a patient safety viral inactivation reagent in the manufacture of human medicines produced from biological systems | 4 January 2033 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the uses of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2022) 1497

16 March 2022

4-(1,1,3,3-Tetra methylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated

(4-tert-OPnEO)

EC No: -, CAS No:-

Eli Lilly Kinsale Limited, Dunderrow, Kinsale, P17 NY71 Cork, Co. Cork Ireland

REACH/22/6/0

Industrial use as a patient safety viral inactivation reagent in the manufacture of human medicines produced from biological systems

4 January 2033

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the uses of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).

---
# C_2022040EN.01001401.xml

| 26.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 40/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 40/14

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10569 – KKR / GIP / CYRUSONE)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 40/02)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | KKR & Co. Inc. (‘KKR’, USA); |
| --- | --- |

—

KKR & Co. Inc. (‘KKR’, USA);

| — | Global Infrastructure Management, LLC (‘GIP’, USA); |
| --- | --- |

—

Global Infrastructure Management, LLC (‘GIP’, USA);

| — | CyrusOne, Inc. (‘CyrusOne’, USA). |
| --- | --- |

—

CyrusOne, Inc. (‘CyrusOne’, USA).

KKR and GIP acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of CyrusOne.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for KKR: a global investment firm that offers alternative asset management and capital markets and insurance solutions.. |
| --- | --- |

—

for KKR: a global investment firm that offers alternative asset management and capital markets and insurance solutions..

| — | for GIP: an independent infrastructure fund manager investing in and managing assets that are mainly in the transportation, energy, waste and water sectors. |
| --- | --- |

—

for GIP: an independent infrastructure fund manager investing in and managing assets that are mainly in the transportation, energy, waste and water sectors.

| — | for CyrusOne: a real estate investment trust (‘REIT’) that owns, operates and develops enterprise-class, carrier-neutral, multi-tenant and single-tenant data centre properties in the US and Europe. |
| --- | --- |

—

for CyrusOne: a real estate investment trust (‘REIT’) that owns, operates and develops enterprise-class, carrier-neutral, multi-tenant and single-tenant data centre properties in the US and Europe.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10569 – KKR / GIP / CRUYSONE

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1286
ANDY ALEXANDER TJHANG, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A79-342-411) Submitted: October 27, 2006 Decided: November 29, 2006 Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Matthew W. Rau, LAW OFFICE OF MATTHEW W. RAU, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Andy Alexander Tjhang, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider its prior order, which adopted and affirmed the immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2006); Jean v. Gonzales , 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Tjhang , No. A79-342-411 (B.I.A. Feb. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
# C_2022427EN.01000101.xml

| 9.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/1

---

EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR THE COOPERATION OF ENERGY REGULATORS

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2021

(2022/C 427/01)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.acer.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/en/The_agency/Organisation/Administrative_Board/Opinions/Opinion%20No%201%20-%202022%20-%20Final%20Accounts%20-%20year%202021.pdf

---
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      In connection  with the quarterly  report of New Century  Equity  Holdings
Corp.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 2006,  as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof, I, Steven
J. Pully, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge that:

(1)   The Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended March 31, 2006,  filed with the
      Securities  and Exchange  Commission on May 15, 2006,  fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
      of 1934; and

(2)   The  information  contained in the Form 10-Q report for the quarter  ended
      March 31, 2006 fairly presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial
      condition and results of operations of New Century Equity Holdings Corp.

By: /s/ Steven J. Pully                    Date: May 15, 2006
------------------------------
Steven J. Pully
Chief Executive Officer
```
# C_2023212EN.01000901.xml

| 16.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/9

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.106615

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 212/08)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 24.4.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.106615 |
| Member State | Austria |
| Region | Austria |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCF — Energiekostenzuschuss für Unternehmen I. Quartal 4, 2022 |
| Legal basis | Richtlinie: Energiekostenzuschuss für Unternehmen Bundesgesetz über einen Energiekostenzuschuss für Unternehmen (Unternehmens-Energiekostenzuschussgesetz — UEZG) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 250 000 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 250 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 30.9.2023 |
| Economic sectors | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | BMAW, AWS |
| Stubenring 1, 1010 Wien |

Date of adoption of the decision

24.4.2023

Aid number

SA.106615

Member State

Austria

Region

Austria

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCF — Energiekostenzuschuss für Unternehmen I. Quartal 4, 2022

Legal basis

Richtlinie: Energiekostenzuschuss für Unternehmen Bundesgesetz über einen Energiekostenzuschuss für Unternehmen (Unternehmens-Energiekostenzuschussgesetz — UEZG)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 250 000 000 EUR

Annual budget: 250 000 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 30.9.2023

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

BMAW, AWS

Stubenring 1, 1010 Wien

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
From: Brenda Shine/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Sent: 03/08/2012 02:01 PM

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Alex Macpherson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Penny Lassiter/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Robin Langdon/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Susan Stahle/DC/USEPA/US@EPA,

William Nickerson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject: RE: Responses to Interagency comments on NSPS Ja

Hi Cortney, 

Tuesday from 3 to 4 will work for us. Do you want to send an invite or should I? 

Also to try to move the conversation along regarding the SBA definition, we would like to 

understand how SBA reads their regulations to define a small refiner as one that has no more than 

1,500 employees and produces less than 125,000 BPD. 

As we explained in our preamble in the June 2008 rule, we read that 125,000 BPD requirement as 

one applicable only in a government procurement context, as footnote 4 indicates. Otherwise, the 

table in the SBA regulations simply states that a small refiner is one with no more than 1,500 

employees. See the June 2008 rule where we explain this - 73 FR 35838, 35857-35858, 35863 

(June 24, 2008). 

See the SBA table: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/textidx?c=ecfr&sid=35a9c1ef73dad4ee23604c295839a06b&rgn=div8&view=text&node=13:1.0.1.1.17.

1.266.9&idno=13 

Also we note that one commenter on the 2007 Ja proposal challenged our size criteria, but that 

commenter was mistaken in their understanding of previous EPA practice. In the Tier 2 vehicles 

rule, we did use a capacity throughput threshold to establish when certain requirements would 

apply to small refiners, but even in that case, the RFA analysis was still based on the 1500 

employee threshold. 

Thanks for considering this. 

Brenda Shine

Environmental Engineer

US Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541-3608, Mail Drop E143-01 

 
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: 03/08/2012 11:04 AM

To: Brenda Shine/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Susan Stahle/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, William Nickerson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA,

Robin Langdon/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Alex 

Macpherson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Penny Lassiter/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Subject: RE: Responses to Interagency comments on NSPS Ja

Thanks. 

 

We are available at the following times for a follow-up conversation: 

Tuesday, 3/13: noon-1, 3-4 

Wednesday, 3/14: 11-noon, 4-5:30 

Thursday, 3/15: 1-2, 4-5:30 

 

Please let me know what time works on your end. 

 

Thanks, 

Cortney
EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. of our report dated January 24, 2003,
included in the 2002 Annual Report to Stockholders of Penn Engineering &
Manufacturing Corp.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January
24, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Penn
Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002, in the following
registration statements:

         Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. 1996 Equity Incentive Plan Form
         S-8 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-20101);

         Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. 1996 Employee Stock Purchase
         Plan Form S-8 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-13073);

         Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. 1998 Stock Option Plan for
         Non-Employee Directors Form S-8 Registration Statement (Registration
         No. 333-92907);

         Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. 1999 Employee Stock Option Plan
         Form S-8 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-92903); and

         Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock
         Purchase Plan Form S-3 Registration Statement (Registration No.
         333-73450).


                                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 24, 2003
**Exhibit      12.1**

**PORTRAIT      CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**COMPUTATION      OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

**(in      thousands, except ratios)**

|                                                                                                    |   |  **For                the Fiscal Year** |    |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|---------|
|                                                                                                    |   |  **2004**                               |    |  **2003** |   |  **2002** |   |  **2001** |   |  **2000** |   |
| Fixed                Charges:                                                                           |   |                                         |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net                interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing                costs) |   | $                                            | 32,459  |   | $ | 30,706 |   | $ | 28,610 |   | $ | 29,683 |   | $ | 29,107 |   |
| Fixed                charges                                                                            |   | $                                            | 32,459  |   | $ | 30,706 |   | $ | 28,610 |   | $ | 29,683 |   | $ | 29,107 |   |
| Earnings:                                                                                               |   |                                         |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Income                (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes                             |   | $                                            | (14,971 | ) | $ | 3,470 |   | $ | (382 | ) | $ | (18,289 | ) | $ | (10,032 | ) |
| Fixed                charges                                                                            |   |                                         | 32,459  |   |   | 30,706 |   |   | 28,610 |   |   | 29,683 |   |   | 29,107 |   |
| Earnings                                                                                                |   | $                                            | 17,488  |   | $ | 34,176 |   | $ | 28,228 |   | $ | 11,394 |   | $ | 19,075 |   |
| Deficiency                of earnings to fixed charges                                                  |   | $                                            | (14,971 | ) | $ | --- |   | $ | (382 | ) | $ | (18,289 | ) | $ | (10,032 | ) |
| Ratio                of earnings to fixed charges                                                       |   |                                         | ---     |   |   | 1.1 |   |   | --- |   |   | --- |   |   | --- |   |
|                                                                                                    |   |                                         |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As
adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Quarterly Report of Park Bancorp, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2009, (the Report), I, David A. Remijas, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David A. RemijasDavid A. RemijasChairman and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 16, 2009