alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
March 21, 2012 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Alaska Airlines’ application for SAN-DCA, Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029. 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

I, Jay Alexander, fully support the application of Alaska Airlines for air service between San Diego and 

Washington Reagan National Airport (DCA). San Diego is the largest region without direct service to DCA. 

Additionally, due to the profound community of interest between San Diego and the nation’s 

capital, the region generates the largest passenger market demand without nonstop service to the 

convenient and close-in airport serving our nation’s capitol. 

San Diego’s sheer market size to Washington coupled with the fact that San Diego to Dulles average 

airfares are the highest of west coast cities, should qualify for the limited slots available for this flight. The 

high airfare is exacerbated when factoring in taxi fares from Dulles to Washington’s city center that average 

about $60 each way. This means travelers between Washington’s city center and San Diego via Dulles 

can pay on average close to $400 one-way. 

There are also countless other San Diego-based and Washington-based businesses that are engaged in 

health science, telecommunications, and national defense that need quick and convenient access to 

Reagan National Airport. The firm I work for, Jones Lang LaSalle, has offices in Washington DC and has 

need for additional nonstop air service to our nation’s capital. Alaska Airlines service would add a needed 

nonstop option to a primary gateway to Washington, DC. I join with the San Diego County Regional Airport 

Authority, the San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation, the World Trade Center San 

Diego, and the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce in support of Alaska Airlines’ application for 

San Diego – Washington Reagan National slots. 

We thank the Department of Transportation for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced docket

and we hope to hear of a favorable review of Alaska Airlines’ San Diego – DCA proposal soon. 

Sincerely, 

Jay Alexander, SIOR 

Managing Director 

858.410.1188 

License no. 01019910

Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.

4747 Executive Drive Suite 400 

San Diego California 92121 

tel +1 858 410 1200 fax +1 858 410 1201
701 A.2d 414

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. Alfred L. SCANLAN, Jr.

Misc. Docket AG No. 54,

Sept. Term, 1997.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Oct. 15, 1997.

ORDER

The Court having considered the joint petition of petitioner Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and respondent, *415Alfred L. Scanlan, Jr., to suspend the respondent from the practice of law for a period of six (6) months effective November 24, 1997, and ending May 25, 1998, it is this 15th day of October, 1997

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and it is further

ORDERED that respondent, Alfred L. Scanlan, Jr., is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for a period of six (6) months, effective November 24,1997 and ending May 25,1998, and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Alfred L. Scanlan, Jr. from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-713, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.
# C_2023130EN.01000201.xml

| 14.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11023 – ADP / JCDECAUX / MEDIA AEROPORTS DE PARIS JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 130/02)

On 30 March 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11023. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11023. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2022098EN.01000101.xml

| 28.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP , as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/331 and Council Regulation (UE) No 269/2014 , as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/332 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2022/C 98/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/331 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/332 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons, entities and bodies should be included in the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for the designation of those persons, entities and bodies appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons, entities and bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address before 1 June 2022:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 52, 25.2.2022, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(4)  OJ L 53, 25.2.2022, p. 1.

---
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.7(g)

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 5

                                       TO

                         EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      Reference is hereby made to the Executive Employment Agreement dated April
6, 2002, as amended, (the "Agreement") between you and BMC Software, Inc. (the
"Company"). For good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby
mutually acknowledged, you and the Company have agreed to amend the Agreement
effective November 1, 2004 as follows:

      1.    Section 2.3
            Effective November 1, 2004, your title will be Senior Vice President
            Worldwide Marketing & Corporate Strategy.

      2.    Section 3.1(a)
            Your salary will remain at $425,000 per annum.

      3.    Section 3.1(e)
            You will continue to be eligible for a cash bonus target incentive
            equal to 150% of your salary and payable in accordance with the
            Company's annual incentive plan.

      4.    The provisions of Section 6.1(f) of the Agreement, which the Company
            acknowledges became operative for you on November 1, 2004, are
            hereby extended at your election until December 31, 2005.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Amendment
as of the date first written above.

                                                    BMC Software, Inc.

                                                    By: /s/ Jerome Adams
                                                    SVP - Administration

Accepted and Agreed to:

/s/ Darroll Buytenhuys
Darroll Buytenhuys

                                       5
# C_2023250EN.01000101.xml

| 14.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.63733

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 250/01)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 17.2.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.63733 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Germany: Aid to ArcelorMittal Hamburg for a decarbonisation project |
| Legal basis | |
| Type of measure | Ad Hoc Case
  ArcelorMittal Hamburg GmbH |
| Objective | Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 55 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | 40,0 -50,0  % |
| Duration | |
| Economic sectors | Manufacture of basic iron and steel and of ferro-alloys |
| Name and address of the granting authority | German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action |
| Scharnhorststrasse 34-37, 10115 Berlin |

Date of adoption of the decision

17.2.2023

Aid number

SA.63733

Member State

Germany

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Germany: Aid to ArcelorMittal Hamburg for a decarbonisation project

Legal basis

Type of measure

Ad Hoc Case

ArcelorMittal Hamburg GmbH

Objective

Environmental protection

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 55 000 000 EUR

Intensity

40,0 -50,0  %

Duration

Economic sectors

Manufacture of basic iron and steel and of ferro-alloys

Name and address of the granting authority

German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action

Scharnhorststrasse 34-37, 10115 Berlin

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------




               Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. & Subsidiaries
                    Certification Of Chief Executive Officer
           Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Commodore Applied Technologies,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on form 10-Q as of and for the three  and nine  month  periods
ended September 30, 2005, Shelby Brewer hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

         (1)  The annual report fully complies with the  requirements of section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents,
              in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

Date:    November 21, 2005


/s/ Shelby T. Brewer
--------------------
Shelby T. Brewer
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2022405EN.01006501.xml

| 21.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 405/65 |
| ---------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Notice for the attention of the natural or legal persons, entities or bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1986, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1985 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (2022/C 405/08) The following information is brought to the attention of the natural or legal persons, entities or bodies that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP ( 1 ), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1986 ( 2 ), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 ( 3 ) as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1985 ( 4 ) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Article 9(2) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 requires that those natural or legal persons, entities or bodies must report, before 1 September 2022 or within 6 weeks from the date of listing in Annex I, whichever is latest, funds or economic resources within the jurisdiction of a Member State belonging to, owned, held or controlled by them, to the competent authority of the Member State where those funds or economic resources are located. They must cooperate with the national competent authority in any verification of such information. Failure to comply with these obligations will be considered as circumvention of the measures on the freezing of funds and of economic resources. The information to be reported must be sent to the competent authority of the relevant Member State, via its website as indicated in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 ( 5 ). The obligation to report under Article 9(2) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 does not apply until 1 January 2023 with regard to funds or economic resources located in a Member State which had laid down a similar reporting obligation under national law before 21 July 2022. ( 1 )  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16. ( 2 )  OJ L 272 I, 20.10.2022, p. 5. ( 3 )  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6. ( 4 )  OJ L 272 I, 20.10.2022, p. 1. ( 5 )  Last consolidated version available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02014R0269-20220916&qid=1666170179071

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7703

ROBERT H. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DEE DEE ROMINGER; JASKA H. ROMINGER; LEN D. HAGAMAN; TOM 

HUGHES; CHAD SLAGLE; BETH BERRY; KERI L. TRIPLETT; STACY 

EGGERS, IV; JESSICA WINEBARGER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Statesville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (5:15-cv-00085-FDW)

Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 24, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert H. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert H. Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without 

prejudice Johnson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment 

or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. 

App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on July 2, 2015. The notice of 

appeal was filed on November 5, 2019.

*

 Because Johnson failed to file a timely notice of 

appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of 

appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for 

mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3029 

To require the Office of Personnel Management to provide complimentary, 

comprehensive identity protection coverage to all individuals whose personally identifiable information was compromised during recent data 

breaches at Federal agencies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2015 

Ms. NORTON (for herself, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. BEYER, Ms. EDWARDS, Mr. 

RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. CONNOLLY, and Mr. CUMMINGS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

A BILL 

To require the Office of Personnel Management to provide 

complimentary, comprehensive identity protection coverage to all individuals whose personally identifiable information was compromised during recent data breaches 

at Federal agencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reducing the Effects 

5 of the Cyberattack on OPM Victims Emergency Response 

6 Act of 2015’’ or the ‘‘RECOVER Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3029 IH

1 SEC. 2. IDENTITY PROTECTION COVERAGE FOR INDIVID2 UALS AFFECTED BY FEDERAL AGENCY DATA 

3 BREACHES. 

4 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘affected 

5 individual’’ means any individual whose personally identi6 fiable information was compromised during— 

7 (1) the data breach of personnel records of cur8 rent and former Federal employees, at a network 

9 maintained by the Department of the Interior, that 

10 was announced by the Office of Personnel Manage11 ment on June 4, 2015; or 

12 (2) the data breach of systems of the Office of 

13 Personnel Management containing information re14 lated to the background investigations of current, 

15 former, and prospective Federal employees, and of 

16 other individuals. 

17 (b) IDENTITY PROTECTION COVERAGE.—The Office 

18 of Personnel Management shall provide to each affected 

19 individual complimentary identity protection coverage 

20 that— 

21 (1) is not less comprehensive than the com22 plimentary identity protection coverage that the Of23 fice provided to affected individuals before the date 

24 of enactment of this Act; 

25 (2) is effective for the remainder of the life of 

26 the individual; and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3029 IH

1 (3) includes not less than $5,000,000 in iden2 tity theft insurance. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I,  Mitchell  Binder, Chief Financial Officer of Orbit International Corp.,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as enacted by  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
(the  "Annual  Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Exchange  Act;  and

     (2)     information  contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations of Orbit
International  Corp.

Dated: March 31, 20010
                                   /s/ Mitchell Binder
                                   -------------------
                                   Mitchell Binder
                                   Chief Financial Officer

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Orbit International Corp. and will
be  retained  by  Orbit  International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.