alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022226EN.01000501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/5 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10780 – WATERLAND / KIDSFOUNDATION / PARTOU)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 226/04)

1.

On 2 June 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022226EN.01000501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Waterland Private Equity Investments B.V. (‘Waterland’, Netherlands), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Orange TopCo B.V. (‘KidsFoundation/Partou’, Netherlands), jointly controlled by Waterland and Onex Corporation. |

Waterland will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of KidsFoundation/Partou.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Waterland: an independent private equity investment group focusing on four investment themes: ageing population, outsourcing and efficiency, leisure and luxury, and sustainability. Waterland is mainly active in Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland and the UK, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | KidsFoundation/Partou: active in the organization and operation of childcare in the Netherlands and in the UK. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022226EN.01000501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10780 – WATERLAND / KIDSFOUNDATION / PARTOU

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022226EN.01000501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022226EN.01000501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
# C_2023203EN.01000401.xml

| 9.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/4

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.50771

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 203/03)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 9.8.2019 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.50771 |
| Member State | France |
| Region | LANGUEDOC-ROUSSILLON |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Projet d'extension du port de Port-La-Nouvelle |
| Legal basis | Convention de financement entre la région Languedoc Roussillon, le Conseil Général de l'Aude et la Communauté d'agglomération du Grand Narbonne signée le 20 décembre 2011; Avenant à la convention de financement |
| Type of measure | Ad Hoc Case
  Région Occitanie |
| Objective | Renewable energy, Sectorial development |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 0 EUR
  Annual budget: 0 EUR |
| Intensity | 99,4  % |
| Duration | 9.8.2019 — 31.12.2022 |
| Economic sectors | Water transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Région Occitanie |
| Hôtel de Région Montpellier 201 avenue de la Pompignane 34064 Montpellier cedex 02 |

Date of adoption of the decision

9.8.2019

Aid number

SA.50771

Member State

France

Region

LANGUEDOC-ROUSSILLON

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Projet d'extension du port de Port-La-Nouvelle

Legal basis

Convention de financement entre la région Languedoc Roussillon, le Conseil Général de l'Aude et la Communauté d'agglomération du Grand Narbonne signée le 20 décembre 2011; Avenant à la convention de financement

Type of measure

Ad Hoc Case

Région Occitanie

Objective

Renewable energy, Sectorial development

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 0 EUR

Annual budget: 0 EUR

Intensity

99,4  %

Duration

9.8.2019 — 31.12.2022

Economic sectors

Water transport

Name and address of the granting authority

Région Occitanie

Hôtel de Région Montpellier 201 avenue de la Pompignane 34064 Montpellier cedex 02

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.0
<CASH>                                         3,695
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,343
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         1,956,611
<DEPRECIATION>                                 194,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,821,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        917,583
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    225,000
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     637,092
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,821,998
<SALES>                                        137,360
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               137,360
<CGS>                                          76,795
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  76,795
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (7,381)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             27,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                37,487
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            37,487
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   37,487
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.80



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated September 2, 2003 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Peerless Mfg. Co. on Form
10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Registration Statement of Peerless Mfg. Co. on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-17229, effective November 12, 1999 and File No.
333-76754, effective January 15, 2002).

                                              /s/ Grant Thornton, LLP
                                              -----------------------
                                              Grant Thornton, LLP

Dallas, Texas
September 2, 2003
# C_2022433EN.01005301.xml

| 15.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/53

---

Notice issued by the Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic in accordance with Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

(2022/C 433/19)

In accordance with Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons, the Ministry of the Environment hereby gives notice that it has received an application for prior consent for a proposal to establish the Karviná-Doly IV extraction site for the working of the natural gas deposit associated with the Důl Darkov coal seam, plant No 3 (deposit registration number 070423). The application relates to a polygonal area of approximately 4,49875 km2. The area is situated within the cadastral area of the municipalities of Karviná-Doly, Stonava and Darkov in the Moravia-Silesia Region (north-eastern Czech Republic).

With reference to the Directive mentioned in the title and to Section 24 of Act No 44/1988 on the protection and exploitation of mineral resources (the Mining Act), as amended, the Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic invites legal or natural persons authorised to carry out mining activities (contracting entities) to submit a competing application for prior consent to establish an extraction site in the area delineated above.

The authority competent to take the decision is the Ministry of the Environment. The criteria, conditions and requirements laid down in Article 5(1) and (2) and Article 6(2) of the Directive are set out in full in Czech legislation in Act No 44/1988 on the protection and exploitation of mineral resources (the Mining Act), as amended.

Applications may be submitted during the 90 days following publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to the Ministry of the Environment at the following address:

| RNDr. Martin Holý |
| --- |
| ředitel odboru geologie |
| Ministerstvo životního prostředí |
| Vršovická 65 |
| 100 10 Praha 10 |
| CZECH REPUBLIC |

RNDr. Martin Holý

ředitel odboru geologie

Ministerstvo životního prostředí

Vršovická 65

100 10 Praha 10

CZECH REPUBLIC

Applications received after the expiry of this period will not be considered. A decision on the applications will be taken no later than 12 months after this period has expired. Further information is available on request from the geology department of the Ministry via the email address martin.holy@mzp.cz.

---

ANNEX

Image 1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2752 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2752

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and increase the 
exclusion for benefits provided to volunteer firefighters and emergency 
                          medical responders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2015

Mr. Larson of Connecticut (for himself, Mr. Reichert, Mr. Courtney, Ms. 
Esty, Mr. Himes, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Lance, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
Israel, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Walz, Ms. Pingree, Mr. 
Thompson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Ellison, 
  Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Honda, Mr. Joyce, Ms. Kaptur, Ms. Kuster, Mr. 
  Goodlatte, Mr. Barletta, Mr. Carter of Texas, Mr. Loebsack, and Mr. 
    Mica) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and increase the 
exclusion for benefits provided to volunteer firefighters and emergency 
                          medical responders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Volunteer Responder Incentive 
Protection Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. BENEFITS PROVIDED TO VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS AND EMERGENCY 
              MEDICAL RESPONDERS.

    (a) Increase in Dollar Limitation on Qualified Payments.--
Subparagraph (B) of section 139B(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``$30'' and inserting ``$50''.
    (b) Extension.--Subsection (d) of section 139B of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``beginning after December 
31, 2010.'' and inserting ``beginning--
            ``(1) after December 31, 2010, and before January 1, 2016, 
        or
            ``(2) after December 31, 2018.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6385

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EARL ANDERSON FRANKLIN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-276, CA-97-1251-1) Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 4, 1999 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Earl Anderson Franklin, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Earl Anderson Franklin seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Franklin , Nos. CR-95-276;CA-97-1251-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2954 

To designate the Federal building located at 617 Walnut Street in Helena, 

Arkansas, as the ‘‘Jacob Trieber Federal Building, United States Post 

Office, and United States Court House’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 7, 2015 

Mr. CRAWFORD (for himself, Mr. WESTERMAN, Mr. WOMACK, and Mr. HILL) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building located at 617 Walnut 

Street in Helena, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Jacob Trieber Federal Building, United States Post Office, and United 

States Court House’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JACOB TRIEBER FEDERAL BUILDING, UNITED 

4 STATES POST OFFICE, AND UNITED STATES 

5 COURT HOUSE. 

6 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building located at 

7 617 Walnut Street in Helena, Arkansas, shall be known 

8 and designated as the ‘‘Jacob Trieber Federal Building, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2954 IH

1 United States Post Office, and United States Court 

2 House’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the Federal building referred to in subsection 

6 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jacob 

7 Trieber Federal Building, United States Post Office, and 

8 United States Court House’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P ALIGN="RIGHT">Exhibit 99</P>

<B><FONT FACE="Arial,Tahoma"><P ALIGN="CENTER">SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION</P>
</B><P ALIGN="CENTER"></P>
<B><P ALIGN="CENTER">Washington, D. C. 20549</P>
</B>
<P>		</P>

<P> </P>
<B><P ALIGN="CENTER">FORM 11-K</P>
</B>
<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P>[X]	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES</P>
<P>	EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934</P>

<P><CENTER>For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999</CENTER></P>

<P ALIGN="CENTER">OR</P>

<P>[  ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES</P>
<P>	EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934</P>

<P> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER">Commission file number 2-82760</P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"></P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<P>A.	Full title of the plan and address of the plan, if different from that of the issuer</P>
<P>	named below:</P>

<B><P ALIGN="CENTER">Peoples Energy Corporation</P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER">Employee Stock Purchase Plan</P>
</B>
<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P>B.	Name of issuer of the securities held pursuant to the plan and the address of its</P>
<P>	principal executive office:</P>
</FONT>
<FONT FACE="Arial,Tahoma"><P ALIGN="CENTER">Peoples Energy Corporation</P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER">130 East Randolph Drive</P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER">Chicago, Illinois 60601</P>

<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P>This Form 11-K is being filed for informational purposes only.</P>

<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<U><P>ITEM 1.   An audited statement of financial condition as of the end of the latest two</P>
</U><P>	<U>fiscal years of the plan.</P>
</U>
<P>	Not applicable.  Employees' payments for Company stock are neither segregated nor held for investment.</P>

<U><P>ITEM 2.   An audited statement of income and changes in plan equity for each of the</P>
</U><P>	<U>latest three fiscal years of the plan.</P>
</U>
<P>	Not applicable.  See above.</P>

<P> </P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
<U><P ALIGN="CENTER">SIGNATURE</P>
</U>
<P> </P>
<P>	Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Peoples Energy Corporation has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.</P>

<TABLE BORDER="0" ALIGN="RIGHT">
<TR>
	<TD>Peoples Energy Corporation</TD>
	</TR>
<TR>
	<TD><U>Employee Stock Purchase Plan</U></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
	<TD><CENTER>(Name of Plan)</CENTER></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>


<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<TABLE BORDER="0" ALIGN="RIGHT">
	<TR>
		<TD><P>Date: December 15, 1999</P></TD>
		<TD><P>            </P></TD>
		<TD><P>By<U> /s/ James M. Luebbers     </P></TD>
	</TR>
	<TR>
		<TD><P> </P></TD>
		<TD><P> </P></TD>
		<TD></U><P>		    (Signature)</P></TD>
	</TR>
	<TR>
		<TD><P> </P></TD>
		<TD><P> </P></TD>
		<TD><P>		James M. Luebbers</P></TD>
	</TR>
	<TR>
		<TD><P> </P></TD>
		<TD><P> </P></TD>
		<TD><P>	Chief Financial Officer and Controller</P></TD>
	</TR>
	<TR>
		<TD><P> </P></TD>
		<TD><P> </P></TD>
		<TD><P>	  Peoples Energy Corporation</P></TD>
	</TR>
</TABLE>

</FONT></BODY>
</HTML>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 1946** 

KENNETH MOATS, SR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, f/k/a West Virginia Department of Highways, a Corporation; COMMISSIONER PAUL MATTOX, JR.; RAYMOND DUKE TACKETT; JEAN FRIEND; NEAL JAY HAMILTON; JUDGE PHILLIP GAUJOT; CHIEF JUDGE RUSSELL CLAWGES, JR.; CHAD LAWTHUER; JAMES E. STRICKLING , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Clarksburg

. Irene M. Keeley , District Judge. ( 1:14

- cv
- 00135

- IMK

- JSK )

Submitted : November 18 , 2014 Decided: November 20, 2014

Before NIEMEYER , MOTZ, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kenneth Moats, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Hedges, Teresa Jean Lyons, HEDGES LYONS & SHEPHERD, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Moats, Sr., appeals the district court ’ s order granting his request that the case be voluntarily dismissed. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. S ee Moats v. West Va. Dep’t of Transp. , No. 1:14

- cv
00135

- IMK

- JSK (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 4, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before th is court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARIF ALI DURRANI, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

Nos. 18-72662 

19-70546 

Agency No. A021-763-558 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of Orders of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 20, 2021**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Arif Ali Durrani, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions pro se for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision finding him removable and denying his motion to 

terminate, his motion to remand, and his application for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-72662 

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) (petition No. 

18-72662) and the BIA’s order denying his motion to reopen or reconsider

(petition No. 19-70546). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review 

for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to terminate. Dominguez v. Barr, 

975 F.3d 725, 734 (9th Cir. 2020). We review de novo legal claims regarding 

United States citizenship, Hughes v. Ashcroft, 255 F.3d 752, 755 (9th Cir. 2001), 

and claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings, Padilla-Martinez 

v. Holder, 770 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2014). We review for abuse of discretion 

the denial of a motion to reopen or reconsider. Ghahremani v. Gonzales, 498 F.3d 

993, 997 (9th Cir. 2007). We deny the petitions for review. 

As to petition No. 18-72662, in his opening brief, Durrani does not challenge 

the bases for the agency’s removability determination, the denial of his motion to 

remand, or the bases for denying his claims for asylum, withholding of removal, 

and CAT. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-1080 (9th Cir. 

2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are 

waived).

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Durrani’s motion to 

terminate where he failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact as to whether 

he acquired citizenship. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(5)(A). Durrani’s contention that 

the agency violated his right to due process or otherwise erred in its analysis of his 
3 18-72662 

claim fails. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error 

to prevail on a due process claim). 

As to petition No. 19-70546, the agency did not abuse its discretion in 

denying Durrani’s motion to reopen or to reconsider, where he did not establish 

prima facie eligibility for relief or identify any error of law or fact in the BIA’s 

prior decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1), (c)(1). 

All pending motions are denied. 

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DENIED.