alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-2064

GILBERT L. SPURLOCK, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; MARK ADKINS, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, 

District Judge. (3:07-cv-00643-RCC) 

Submitted: January 5, 2009 Decided: January 21, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Gilbert L. Spurlock, Appellant Pro Se. Carol A. Casto, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Gilbert L. Spurlock appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge 

and dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See Spurlock v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, No. 

3:07-cv-00643-RCC (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 21, 2008). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 4 April 2006         

amending Decision 92/452/EEC as regards certain embryo collection and production teams in the United States of America

(notified under document number C(2006) 1248)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/270/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 89/556/EEC of 25 September 1989 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in and importation from third countries of embryos of domestic animals of the bovine species (1), and in particular Article 8 (1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 92/452/EEC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from 10 April 2006.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 April 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 302, 19.10.1989, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Decision 2006/60/EC (OJ L 31, 3.2.2006, p. 24).

(2)OJ L 250, 29.8.1992, p. 40. Decision as last amended by Decision 2006/85/EC (OJ L 40, 11.2.2006, p. 24).

----

ANNEX

The Annex to Decision 92/452/EEC is amended as follows:

----
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-20-00363-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 43rd District Court

Parker County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV11-1167

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

CAROL POOL, Appellant

V.

JAMES POOL, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Based on pro se Appellant Carol Pool’s purported notice of restricted appeal, 

which complains of orders in two trial court causes, this court docketed two separate 

appeals: (1) appellate cause number 02-20-00362-CV1 for Carol’s challenges to orders 

in trial court cause number 18-765 and (2) this appeal for her challenge to the trial 

court’s May 14, 2020 “Order Granting [James Pool’s] Motion to Compel Discovery”

in trial court cause number CV11-1167.

Because we were concerned that we lack jurisdiction over the interlocutory 

appeal of a discovery order, we notified Carol that the discovery order does not 

appear to be a final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order. We informed her

that unless she or another party furnished this court with a response showing grounds 

for continuing the appeal, we could dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See

Tex. R. App. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

Carol’s response indicates that she “never intended to perfect two separate

appeals under two different trial court case numbers” and that we “should set aside 

[this appeal] as void ab initio and [a] nullity rather than toll dismissals.” Because we 

lack jurisdiction over this appeal, we dismiss it.

This court has appellate jurisdiction only of appeals from final judgments and 

from interlocutory orders that the Texas Legislature has specified are immediately 

1

Appellate cause number 02-20-00362-CV remains pending. Pool v. Pool, 

No. 02-20-00362-CV (Tex. App.—Fort Worth filed Nov. 13, 2020).
3

appealable. Lehmann v. Har–Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); see, e.g., Tex. 

Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014. An order granting a motion to compel

discovery is an interlocutory order that is not appealable until after a final judgment.

Clifton v. Burroughs, No. 2-08-404-CV, 2008 WL 5401489, at *2 (Tex. App.—Fort 

Worth Dec. 23, 2008, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.); see also Edwards v. Panda 

Express Inc., No. 05-19-00715-CV, 2019 WL 4027082, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug.

27, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.).

The trial court has not yet signed a final judgment in this matter. The 

challenged interlocutory order compelling discovery is therefore not yet appealable. 

Consequently, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(a), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: February 4, 2021
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 906 OF
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of TIB Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, David P. Johnson, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.

Date:       May 13, 2004              /s/ David P. Johnson
            ------------              -----------------------------------------
                                      David P. Johnson
                                      Executive Vice President and Chief
                                      Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to TIB Financial Corp. and will be
retained by TIB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.




                                       27
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022454EN.01011401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/114 |

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 454/05)

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Sweden |
| Concerned routes | | | | | --- | --- | | | Arvidsjaur–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Gällivare–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Hagfors–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Hemavan–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Kramfors-Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Lycksele–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Mora – Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Pajala–Luleå | | | | | --- | --- | | | Sveg–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Torsby–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Vilhelmina–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Östersund–Umeå | |
| Period of validity of the contract | 27 October 2023 – 26 October 2027 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 2 months from publication of this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained | Web address for more information about the tender: https://upphandling.trafikverket.se For further information please contact: Swedish Transport Administration Tel. 0771 921921 Int. Phone: +46 771921921 Contact person: Lisa Berglund Email: lisa.a.berglund@trafikverket.se | | | | --- | --- | | Address: | Trafikverket | | | 781 89 Borlänge | | | SWEDEN | Internet: www.trafikverket.se |

---
# C_2022049EN.01000401.xml

| 31.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10581 – SPIE / STRUKTON SERVICES)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 49/04)

On 24 January 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10581. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10581. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2023231EN.01001201.xml

| 30.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/12

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.103705

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 231/11)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 16.5.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.103705 |
| Member State | Latvia |
| Region | Latvia |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Komerciālo elektronisko plašsaziņas līdzekļu kapacitātes stiprināšana |
| Legal basis | Par vidēja termiņa budžeta ietvaru 2022., 2023. un 2024. gadam |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Sectorial development |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 1 440 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 480 000 EUR |
| Intensity | 80,0  % |
| Duration | Until 30.12.2024 |
| Economic sectors | Programming and broadcasting activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | National Electronic Mass Media Council of Latvia |
| Doma laukums 8A, Riga, LV-1939, Latvia |

Date of adoption of the decision

16.5.2023

Aid number

SA.103705

Member State

Latvia

Region

Latvia

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Komerciālo elektronisko plašsaziņas līdzekļu kapacitātes stiprināšana

Legal basis

Par vidēja termiņa budžeta ietvaru 2022., 2023. un 2024. gadam

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Sectorial development

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 1 440 000 EUR

Annual budget: 480 000 EUR

Intensity

80,0  %

Duration

Until 30.12.2024

Economic sectors

Programming and broadcasting activities

Name and address of the granting authority

National Electronic Mass Media Council of Latvia

Doma laukums 8A, Riga, LV-1939, Latvia

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
# Official Journal L 343/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 343 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5829 December 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 343

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5829 December 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 of 28 July 2015 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards detailed rules concerning certain provisions of the Union Customs Code | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 of 24 November 2015 laying down detailed rules for implementing certain provisions of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the Union Customs Code | 558 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 of 28 July 2015 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards detailed rules concerning certain provisions of the Union Customs Code

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 of 24 November 2015 laying down detailed rules for implementing certain provisions of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the Union Customs Code

558

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# CI2022103EN.01000101.xml

| 3.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 103/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 103/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/354, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/353 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2022/C 103 I/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/354 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/353 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons, entities and bodies should be included in the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for the designation of those persons, entities and bodies appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons, entities and bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address before 1 June 2022:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 66, 2.3.2022, p. 14.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(4)  OJ L 66, 2.3.2022, p. 1.

---
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 16 - 00187 - CR
EX PARTE LEROY ALVAR A DO On Appeal from the 121st District Court Terry County, Texas Trial Court No. 6758 -

A , Honorable Kelly G. Moore, Presiding 

### May 20 , 2016 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant , Leroy Alvarado, appearing pro se , attempts to appeal the trial court’s order on his application for post - conviction writ of habeas corpus in a felony case. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
In January 2015, appellant pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea bargain, to theft of property valued less than $1,500, 1 enhanced to a third - degree felony. 2 Appellant was sentenced to five years confinement, with the term of confinement suspended and appellant placed on community supervision for a period of five years, and a $1,500 fine.

1 T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 31.03(a), (e)(4)( D ) (West Supp. 2015 ). 2 T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 12.425(a) (West Supp. 2015 ).2

In February 2016, appellant pleaded true to the S tate’s motion to revoke probation. T he trial court revoked his community supervision and sentenced him to three years confinement. Appellant subsequently filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court. On March 8, 2016, the trial court issued an o rder on the application for writ of habeas corpus , finding that there were no controverted, previously unresolved facts material to the legality of appellant’s confinement. See T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . A NN . art. 11.07, § 3 (c) (West 2015 ). The trial court recommended denial of appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus and order ed the district clerk to immediately transmit the application , any answers filed, and a copy of the order to the Court of Criminal Appeals.
A ppellant filed t his appeal on April 2 6, 2016 . By letter dated May 3, 2016, w e notified appellant that it did not appear we had jurisdiction and directed him to file a re sponse by May 16, 2016 , showing grounds for continuing the appeal or the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction
. Appellant filed a response , but did not show how this Court has jurisdiction over t his appeal. Jurisdiction to grant post - conviction habeas corpus relief in felony cases rests exclusively with the Court of Criminal Appeals. Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist. , 392 S.W.3d 115, 117 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (per curiam). Post - conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases must be filed in the court in which the conviction was obtained
. See T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . A NN . art . 11.07 , § 3 ( West 2015 ). The trial court must make any necessar y findings of fact and then forward the application for writ of habeas corpus , its findings , and the record to the Court of Criminal Appeals for a final ruling on the application
. See T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . A NN . art. 11.07, § § 3, 5 (West3

2015 ). Accordingly , this C ourt has no jurisdiction over appellant’s applica tion for writ of habeas corpus.
T herefore , we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Per Curiam Do not publish.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

September 27, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00132-CV

IN RE C.R.K., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

312th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-44278

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 28, 2022, relator C.R.K. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in 

this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the 

petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Clinton E. Wells, presiding 

judge of the 312th District Court of Harris County, to allow relator to have access to 

the reporter’s record of Judge Wells’ in-chambers interview with the child.
2

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan.
# C_2023203EN.01000501.xml

| 9.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/5

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107306

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 203/04)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 26.5.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107306 |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | 19th Prolongation of the Credit Union Resolution Scheme under the Central Bank and Credit Institutions (Resolution) Act 2011. |
| Legal basis | Central Bank and Credit Institutions (Resolution) Act 2011. |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | |
| Budget | Overall budget: 500 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | 1.6.2023 — 31.5.2024 |
| Economic sectors | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Minister for Finance |
| Government Buildings, Merrion Street, Dublin 2, Ireland |

Date of adoption of the decision

26.5.2023

Aid number

SA.107306

Member State

Ireland

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

19th Prolongation of the Credit Union Resolution Scheme under the Central Bank and Credit Institutions (Resolution) Act 2011.

Legal basis

Central Bank and Credit Institutions (Resolution) Act 2011.

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Budget

Overall budget: 500 000 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

1.6.2023 — 31.5.2024

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Minister for Finance

Government Buildings, Merrion Street, Dublin 2, Ireland

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---