alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022364EN.01000501.xml

| 23.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/5

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10699 – SALMAR / NTS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 364/04)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | SalMar ASA (‘SalMar’, Norway), ultimately controlled by Kvarv AS, |
| --- | --- |

—

SalMar ASA (‘SalMar’, Norway), ultimately controlled by Kvarv AS,

| — | NTS ASA (‘NTS’, Norway). |
| --- | --- |

—

NTS ASA (‘NTS’, Norway).

SalMar will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of NTS.

The concentration is accomplished by way of public bid announced on 17 March 2022.

2.

| — | SalMar is a producer of salmon with farming and processing operations in Norway, Iceland and Scotland, while its parent Kvarv AS has further subsidiaries active in the acquaculture industry, |
| --- | --- |

—

SalMar is a producer of salmon with farming and processing operations in Norway, Iceland and Scotland, while its parent Kvarv AS has further subsidiaries active in the acquaculture industry,

| — | NTS is, via its subsidiaries SalmoNor AS, Norwegian Royal Salmon ASA and Frøy ASA, active in farming and processing of salmon in Norway and Iceland as well as other parts of the acquaculture industry. |
| --- | --- |

—

NTS is, via its subsidiaries SalmoNor AS, Norwegian Royal Salmon ASA and Frøy ASA, active in farming and processing of salmon in Norway and Iceland as well as other parts of the acquaculture industry.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10699 – SalMar / NTS

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
EXHIBIT
99.2

# CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Republic Resources, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10- KSB for the as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Louis B. Breaux, the President of
EnviroWall, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company) certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| | (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | By: /s/ Louis B. Breaux
Louis B. Breaux
Principal Executive Officer of EnviroWall, Inc.
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March
24, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 10, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 316 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents                           ( print page 76888)                        are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-649, CP2024-658.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21344 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00823

- CV

In re Developments Solutions CAT, LLC; Allegiant Realty Partners, LLC;

Siepiela Interests, LLC; Taylor Duncan Interests, LLC; James Siepiela; Gregory Rich;

Phillip W. Duncan; and La rry Taylor

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM HAYS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

_______________________ ___________________

Gisela D. Triana

, Justice

Before Chie f Just ice Rose, Justices Baker and T riana

Filed: J a nuary 2 4, 2020
### In The C ou rt o f A p p ea ls Si x t h Appe l l at e Di st r i c t o f Te x as a t Te x ar ka na

______________________________ No . 0 6- 07 -0 00 56 -C V

______________________________ THOMAS VI CTOR (TOM) RHODE S, J R. AND JOS EPHI NE ANN (JOS I E) [L OPEZ ] O'DEL L , BO TH I NDI VI DUAL L Y AND BO TH AS REPRES ENTATI VE OF THE ESTATE OF SHI EN A R HO DE S, D ECE ASE D, Ap pe lla nts V. HONDA , GREENVI L L E HOND A, ET AL ., Appellee s

On Appea l from the 354th J udicial District Court

Hunt County , Texas Trial Court No. 67,122

B e f o r e M o r r i s s , C

. J. , C a

rt e r a n d M o s e l e y , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by J ustice Carte r2 MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON Th oma s V ic tor

(T om) Rho de s, Jr., a nd Jose ph ine An n ( Josie ) [L op e z] O' De ll, both individually and as repr esentatives of the estate of Shiena Rhodes, dece ased, appea led from the trial court' s judgme nt ag ainst them and in favor of Honda , et al. The a ppellants claimed indig ence and reque sted a fr ee r ecor d. That indig ence was c ontested by both the district c lerk and the court repor ter. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 20. 1( e ). Th e tr ia l c ourt he ld a hea ring and dete rmined the a ppellants wer e not indige nt. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 20.1(i). That deter mination was appe aled in a se para t e ap peal, c ause numbe r 06-07- 00081-CV. Our opinion upholding the tr ial court' s decision in that case issued Fe bruar y 6, 2008, and, af

ter the time pa ssed to appea l our ruling , our mandate issued J une 27, 2008. We abated the cur rent a ppeal until the issue of indig ence was de termined. On July 1, 20 08 , we iss ue d a n or de r in the c ur re nt c a se , g ivi ng the a

pp e lla nts thi rt y da y s to file the c lerk' s and re porter' s rec ords, and informing the appellants that, if the re cords we re not filed by that time, this appeal would be dismissed for w ant of prose cution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(b), (c) . I t is now Aug ust 19, and those re cords have not bee n filed.3

There fore , we dismiss this appeal for w ant of prose cution.

J ack Ca rter J ustice Date Submitted: Aug ust 19, 2008 Date D ecide d: Aug ust 20, 2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1223

NANCY B. MCGLOCKLIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge.

(CA-95-206-A)

Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 18, 1997

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nancy B. McGlocklin, Appellant Pro Se. Rafael Melendez, SOCIAL

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Julie C.

Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order adopting the

report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and affirming the

decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying disability

benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. McGlocklin v. Apfel, No. CA-95-206-A (W.D.

Va. Dec. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE> 1
                                                                 Exhbit 10.17(b)

                             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                      PAYLESS CASHWAYS DIRECTOR OPTION PLAN

         The Payless Cashways Director Option Plan (the "Director Option Plan"),
effective March 15, 1993, is hereby amended as follows:

         1.       Section 5. Non-Qualified Stock Option Awards: Section 5 of the
                  Director  Option Plan is amended by deleting the phase "at the
                  time  the  Plan  is  effective"  in  the  first  sentence  and
                  substituting the following phase "on July 15, 1992.

         2.       Section 6.  Terms of the  Options:  Section 6 of the  Director
                  Option Plan is amended by  deleting  the phase "six months and
                  one day after" in the second  sentence  and  substituting  the
                  word "on".

         3.       Section  7.  Nontransferability:  Section  7 of  the  Director
                  Option  Plan is  amended  by  deleting  the  paragraph  in its
                  entirety and substituting the following paragraph:

                  "7.      Nontransferability
                           ------------------

                           Each Option awarded under this Plan, unless otherwise
                  determined by the Committee,  shall not be transferable  other
                  than by will or the  laws of  descent  and  distribution,  and
                  shall be exercisable,  during the participant's lifetime, only
                  by the  participant  or the  participant's  guardian  or legal
                  representative."

         4.       Section 11.  Amendment and Termination of Plan:  Section 11 of
                  the  Director  Option  Plan is  amended by  deleting  the last
                  sentence of said section.

         5.       Section 12. Shareholder  Approval:  Section 12 of the Director
                  Option  Plan is  amended  by  deleting  the  paragraph  in its
                  entirety and substituting the following paragraph:

                  "12.     Shareholder Approval
                           --------------------

                           This Plan was  adopted by the Board of  Directors  of
                  the  Company on  February  8, 1993,  and was  approved  by the
                  shareholders of the Company on July 15, 1992."

                  THIS AMENDMENT is made as of and effective December 12, 1996.

                                                     PAYLESS CASHWAYS, INC.

                                                     BY:  /s/ David Stanley
                                                         ------------------

ATTEST:

/s/ E. J. Holland, Jr.
----------------------
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2803 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to ensure 

State control over academic standards, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2015 

Mr. ZELDIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to ensure State control over academic standards, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STATE CONTROL OVER STANDARDS. 

4 Subpart 2 of part E of title IX of the Elementary 

5 and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7901 

6 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following 

7 new section: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 9537. STATE CONTROL OVER STANDARDS. 

9 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this Act shall be con10 strued to prohibit a State from withdrawing from the 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2803 IH

1 Common Core State Standards developed under the Com2 mon Core State Standards Initiative, any other academic 

3 standards common to a significant number of States, or 

4 assessments tied to such standards. 

5 ‘‘(b) PROHIBITION.—No officer or employee of the 

6 Federal Government shall, directly or indirectly, through 

7 grants, contracts or other cooperative agreements, through 

8 waiver granted under section 9401 or through any other 

9 authority, take any action against a State that exercises 

10 its rights under subsection (a).’’. 

11 SEC. 2. CLERICAL AMENDMENT. 

12 The table of contents of the Elementary and Sec13 ondary Education Act of 1965 is amended by inserting 

14 after the item relating to section 9536 the following: 

‘‘Sec. 9537. State control over standards.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Martin , Michae l (OST) OnT-CvST
- ^^^?-;:)l-<^' }

From : Bradshaw , Ja y[Jay.Bradshaw@maine.gov ] 'AMSPORTATIO N Sent : Wednesday , Septembe r22 , 201 0 9:3 6 A M ' • •-' rOPFR/'T'OM' ^ To : dennis.devane@dot.gov ; Martin , Michae l (OST ) ' • ••'--'^^-"^n ^ Subject : Appea l fo rconsideratio n re : Commercia l Servic e at AU G (Augusta , ME )
Goo d Morning , I t has com e t o m yattentio n tha t th e decisio n regardin g th e commercia l ai rcarrie rfo rAU G (Augusta , ME ) i s unde r consideratio n withi n you roffice

. I a m writin g t o expres s bot h m ythank s fo ryou rreviewin g th e decisio n mad e byth e August a Cit yCouncil - an d t o provid e m ysuppor t tha t Colga n Ai rcontinu e t o b e th e carrie rfo rthi s airport

. I mak e thi s reques t fo rman yreason s - man yparties , includin g Colgan , hav e mad e operationa l an d financia l investment s i n th e servic e t o AU G - a n investmen t tha t play s a n importan t rol e i n th e busines s environment

. Havin g acces s t o th e U S Airway s networ k

an d convenien t connection s i n BO S i s a majo rconsideratio n fo rbusines s an d pleasur e travelers

. I a m impresse d tha t recognizin g th e financia l challenge s o ffedera l subsidies , tha t Colga n Ai rhas extende d thei r commitmen t wit h a revise d far e schedul e tha t wil l mak e thi s servic e eve n mor e appealing

. Whil e I hav e man ycompliment s fo rth e Colga n approac h t o thei rservic e a t AUG , I a m a t th e sam e tim e quit e trouble d byth e decisio n mad e b yth e Airpor t Committe e regardin g carrie rplans

. That concer n i s heightene d b yth e potentia l conflic t o finteres t wit h tw o member s o ftha t committe e wh o stan d t o personall ybenefi t bya chang e t o Cap e Air

. Als o troublin g i s tha t whe n th e committee' s repor t wa s presente d t o th e August a CityCouncil , man ycounci l member s publicl ycommente d tha t the yreceive d man ycalls , letters , an d e-mail s fro m folk s supportin g Colgan

. On e cit ycouncilo r sai d tha t the yreceive d mor e comment s regardin g keepin g Colga n tha n the yha d o n an yothe ragend a ite m i n recen t memory
. Fro m a persona l standpoint , I fl you t o fAU G severa l time s a yea ro n mostl ybusines s travel

. I enjo yth e convenienc e o f usin g AU G an d t o th e persona l an d friendl yservic e provide d byColga n staff

. "Convenience " i n ai rtrave l i s a ter m no t ofte n use d - an d i n m yopinion , movin g t o th e mor e limite d servic e propose d byCap e Ai ri s a significan t ste p backward s fo rAU G an d th e centra l Main e area
. Than k yo u fo ryou rtim e an d consideration

. Sincerely , Ja yBradshaw , Directo r Main e Emergenc yMedica l Service s Departmen t ofPubli cSafet y 4 5 Commerc e Dr. , Suit e 1 15 2 Stat e Hous e Statio n Augusta , M E 0433 3 (207 ) 626-386 0 (207 ) 287-625 1 (fax ) www.maine.qov/dps/em s
#### SMITH v. STATE.

No. 20526.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 14, 1939.

L. B. Cooper, of Cotulla, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is passing a forged instrument; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The check upon which the indictment is predicated was made payable to Floyd Smith. It is signed: “Smith Drilling Contractor, by F. E. Smith.” The sufficiency of the indictment is attacked upon the ground that it is made apparent from the averments thereof that the appellant went by the name of both Floyd Smith and F. E. Smith, and that the instrument described was signed with one of these names; that it therefore appears from the averments of the indictment that the alleged instrument did not purport to be the act of another, but purported to be the act of the appellant. In support of his contention that the indictment is insufficient, appellant cites Carnahan v. State, 110 Tex. Cr.R. 550, 9 S.W.2d 1034, in which it was held that when the alleged forged instrument purports to hear the true signature of the accused/ an offense is not charged in the absence .of an explanatory averment making plain the fact that, while the signature appears to be that of the accused, it is in fact an imitation of that of another person. We think the Carnahan Case is distinguishable from the case at bar. Here the indictment on its face shows that the appellant intended to bind Smith Drilling Contractor. See Parvin v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 172, 103 S.W.2d 773. We deem the indictment sufficient.

The statement of facts was not approved by the trial judge.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001029315
<NAME>  Payco General American Credits Inc
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                       538
<INVENTORY>                                     42,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,205
<PP&E>                                          44,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,699
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,683
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022166EN.01000901.xml

| 20.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/9

---

Notice to importers

Imports of garlic into the Community

(2022/C 166/07)

By a notice to importers published in the Official Journal C 197 of 12 August 2005, p. 8, the Commission advised European Union operators declaring / presenting documentary evidence of origin for garlic imported under the tariff heading CN 0703 20 00, declared either under the GATT tariff quota open by Council Decision 2001/404/EC (1), or under preferences contained in Community agreements or under unilateral preferences arrangements, to take all necessary precautions due to reasonable doubt concerning the origin of that product. The release of those products for free circulation could thus give rise to a customs debt, and lead to fraud against the Community’s financial interests.

Following the publication of the notice, the number of fraudulent EU imports decreased. Moreover, no substantial information on new manipulations has been submitted in the recent years.

The notice to importers published in the Official Journal C 197 of 12 August 2005 has therefore become devoid of purpose as regards consignments of the product concerned declared for release for free circulation on or after the date of the publication of this notice, and is hereby withdrawn.

---

(1)  Decision 2001/404/EC of 28 May 2001 on the conclusion of an Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Community and Argentina pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 for the modification of concessions with respect to garlic provided for in Schedule CXL annexed to GATT (OJ L 142, 29.5.2001, p. 7) and Commission Regulation (EC) No 565/2002 of 2 April 2002 establishing the method for managing tariff quotas and introducing a system of certificates of origin for garlic imported from third countries (OJ L 86, 3.4.2002, p. 11).

---