alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 19

- 00157

- CR

KHADIJAH WRIGHT, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 5th District Court Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 18F0377

- 005

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 

### O RDER The clerk’s record in this appeal was filed October 28, 2019, and the reporter’s record was filed December 23, 2019, making the appellant’s brief originally due January 22, 2020. This Court extended that briefing deadline twice, on appellant’s motions, resulting in the most recent due date of March 6, 2020. While we warned counsel when granting his second motion that further

exte nsion requests would not be granted, absent extraordinary circumstances, counsel has filed a third motion seeking another extension of the briefing deadline.

We have reviewed the case file and appellate record, as well as counsel’ s most recent

motion to ex tend time , and find no extraordinary circumstances that would warrant an additional extension of the filing deadline. Consequently, counsel’s most recent motion to extend the deadline for filing appellant’s brief in this matter is denied.

W e hereby order counsel to file the appellate brief in this matter on or before March 20 , 20 20

. IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: March 11, 2020
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

KA F ELE CLARKE

,

Petitioner

,

v. Case No. 5D 16

- 4128

S TATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent

. ________________________________/

Opinion filed January 20, 2017

Petition for Belated Appeal A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Robert Wesley, Public Defender, Orlando,
and, Jared Adelman, Assistant Public Defender, Orlando, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed

with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the November 4, 201 6

,

judgment and sentence in C ase N o. 2016

- CF

- 001473

- A

- OR in the Circuit Court in and

for Orange County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)( 6 )(D).

PETITION GRANTED

.

PALMER, ORFINGER, LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.25


                               ENDORSEMENT NO. 5

                         Attached to and made a part of
                             AUTOMOBILE QUOTA SHARE
                       AGREEMENT OF REINSURANCE NO. 8937
                                    between
                          SAFE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY
                     (herein referred to as the "Company")
                                      and
                        GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION
                    (herein referred to as the "Reinsurer")



IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED that effective 11:59 P.M., September 30, 2004, this
Agreement is hereby terminated. The Reinsurer shall not be liable for any claims
or losses resulting from Occurrences taking place after such time and date.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Endorsement to be
executed in duplicate,

this 15th day of October, 2004,

                                  SAFE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY



                                  /s/ Gregory A. Sutton
                                  -------------------------------

Attest: DeLaina L. Borders
        ----------------------

and this 13th day of October, 2004.

                                  GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION



                                  /s/ Jon Schriber
                                  -------------------------------
                                      Vice President

Attest: William J. Brassington
        ----------------------


                        GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION
                          A BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY COMPANY
#### RODDY v. STATE.

No. 20267.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 29, 1939.

Bartlett & Bartlett, of Marlin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is assault with intent to murder; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Appellant had been moving a house for Ira Rowell. According to Rowell, appellant had refused to carry out his contract and he had remonstrated with him. A quarrel ensued and Rowell struck appellant in the face with his fist. Appellant then picked up a breast yoke and struck Rowell, at the same time calling to his sister to bring his gun. Rowell and his companions left the scene of the difficulty and hid behind some bushes. Upon receiving the gun from his sister, appellant fired toward the bushes. None of the shots took effect.

It appears from the testimony of the state that Rowell was about fifty yards away from appellant when the shot was fired. Appellant testified that he called to his sister to bring his gun because Rowell had called to his companions to bring him a gun. Further, appellant testified: “I shot in the air to scare them and keep them from coming back. I shot to scare them and to keep them from coming back to kill me. I didn’t intend to kill them or anything of that kind.”

We gravely doubt the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction for assault with intent to murder.

We are of opinion that the court should have responded to appellant’s exception to the charge and submitted an instruction covering the law of simple assault. Appellant’s testimony to the effect that he shot in the air only to scare the injured party and his companions called for such an instruction. In Smith v. State, 114 Tex. Cr.R. 534, 26 S.W.2d 1069, we said: “The courts have many times held that an accused who unlawfully shoots a gun with intent to alarm or scare is only guilty of a simple assault.” See, also, Branch’s Ann. P.C., sec. 1537.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT 11
<TABLE>

                      SPARTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)
<CAPTION>

                                                        Fiscal Year Ended

                                                  Oct 30,  Oct 31,  Nov. 1,
                                                   1999     1998      1997
<S>                                               <C>      <C>      <C>
NET EARNINGS

Basic net earnings applicable to common shares   $43,071  $33,720   $25,493
Add:  Distributions on Preferred Securities,       1,280        -         -
net of tax
 Diluted net earnings
                                                  $44,351  $33,720  $25,493
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
    Weighted average common shares outstanding     27,038   26,807    26,418
    Add Shares issuable from assumed exercise of    1,075        -         -
Preferred Stock
    Add: Shares issuable from assumed exercise      1,869    1,802     1,420
of options and warrants
   Diluted weighted average common shares
outstanding                                        29,982   28,609    27,838
NET EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
   Basic                                           $ 1.59    $1.26      $.96
   Diluted                                         $ 1.48    $1.18      $.92

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001058622
<NAME> HIGH PERFORMANCE SERVICES OF FLORIDA INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                       538
<INVENTORY>                                     42,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,205
<PP&E>                                          44,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,699
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,683
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2734 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2734

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ``George P. Kazen 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 24, 2018

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself and Mr. Cruz) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ``George P. Kazen 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GEORGE P. KAZEN FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES 
              COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building and United States courthouse 
located at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``George P. Kazen Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 
United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ``George P. Kazen Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FROM FORM 10-Q OF PHOENIX INTERNATIONAL LTD, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 (FOR SEC USE ONLY) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,163,376
<SECURITIES>                                 3,054,578
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,118,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                (1,273,092)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,962,898
<PP&E>                                       8,060,803
<DEPRECIATION>                              (5,160,788)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,011,608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,563,613
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,107
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,169,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,011,608
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,345,939
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,816,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               784,048
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (21,293)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (17,275,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    73,353
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (17,349,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (17,349,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.87)


</TABLE>
# C_2022395EN.01000401.xml

| 14.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/4

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1544, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1944, and in Council Regulation (EU) 2018/1542, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1936 , concerning restrictive measures against the proliferation and use of chemical weapons

(2022/C 395/04)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities that appear in the Annex to Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1544 (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1944 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) 2018/1542 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1936 (4), concerning restrictive measures against the proliferation and use of chemical weapons.

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of natural or legal persons, entities and bodies in the above-mentioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision (CFSP) 2018/1544 and Regulation (EU) 2018/1542 should continue to apply to those persons and entities.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2018/1542, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, before 1 July 2023, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, in accordance with Article 8 of Decision (CFSP) 2018/1544 and Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1542.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 259, 16.10.2018, p. 25.

(2)  OJ L 268, 14.10.2022, p. 24.

(3)  OJ L 259, 16.10.2018, p. 12.

(4)  OJ L 268, 14.10.2022, p. 7.

---
[LETTERHEAD OF ERNST & YOUNG]

                         REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

                             To the Shareholders of

           LOGAL EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY

      We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Logal Educational
Software and Systems Ltd. and its subsidiary at December 31, 1997 and 1998, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.

      We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards in the United States and Israel, including those prescribed by the
Auditors Regulations (Mode of Performance) (Israel), 1973. Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above,
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
the Company and its subsidiary at December 31, 1997 and 1998, and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles in Israel. As applicable to the Company's
financial statements, accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States and Israel are substantially identical in all material respects.


                                                 /s/ KOST FORER & GABBAY

Tel-Aviv, Israel                                   KOST FORER & GABBAY
February 8, 1999                         A Member of Ernst & Young International
# C_2022473EN.01001101.xml

| 13.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 473/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 473/11

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entity to whom measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/2433 and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2428 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran apply

(2022/C 473/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entity that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP (1), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/2433 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2428 (4) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons and entity should be included on the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/235/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 359/2011.

The attention of the persons and entity concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons and entity concerned may submit a request to the Council before 15 January 2023, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons and entity concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 51.

(2)  OJ L 318 I, 12.12.2022, p. 35.

(3)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 318 I, 12.12.2022, p. 1

---