Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 20, 2012 / Notices 37041 

3Sierra Club v. EPA, 551 F.3rd 1019 (D.C. Cir. 

2008). 

was specifically excluding from its 

designation, including any standards 

under 40 CFR part 63 that control 

radionuclides, or any provisions 

pertaining to an accidental release 

prevention program. These exclusions 

remain in effect. EPA also specified 

various requirements, limitations and 

restrictions. All of these remain in 

effect. 

Please also note that on December 19, 

2008, in Sierra Club v. EPA,3 the United 

States Court of Appeals for the District 

of Columbia Circuit vacated certain 

provisions of the General Provisions of 

40 CFR Part 63 relating to exemptions 

for startup, shutdown, and malfunction 

(SSM). On October 16, 2009, the Court 

issued a mandate vacating these SSM 

exemption provisions, which are found 

at 40 CFR § 63.6(f)(1) and (h)(1). 

Accordingly, EPA no longer allows 

sources the SSM exemption as provided 

for in the vacated provisions at 40 CFR 

§ 63.6(f)(1) and (h)(1), even though EPA 

has not yet formally removed these SSM 

exemption provisions from the General 

Provisions of 40 CFR Part 63. Because 

Maryland incorporated 40 CFR Part 63 

by reference, Maryland should also no 

longer allow sources to use the former 

SSM exemption from the General 

Provisions of 40 CFR Part 63 due to the 

Court’s ruling in Sierra Club v. EPA. 

EPA appreciates Maryland’s 

continuing NESHAP and NSPS 

enforcement efforts, and also 

Maryland’s decision to take automatic 

delegation of all current and future 

NESHAP and NSPS by adopting them 

by reference. 

Sincerely, 

Diana Esher, 

Director Air Protection Division’’ 

This notice acknowledges the update 

of Maryland’s delegation of authority to 

implement and enforce NESHAP and 

NSPS. 

Dated: June 3, 2012. 

Diana Esher, 

Director, Air Protection Division, Region III. 

[FR Doc. 2012–15018 Filed 6–19–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

EXPORT–IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S. 

[Public Notice 2012–0111] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Final Collection; Comment 

Request 

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S. 

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review 

and Comments Request. 

Form Title: EIB 94–07 Exporters 

Certificate for Use with a Short Term 

Export Credit Insurance Policy. 

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of 

the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a part 

of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden, 

invites the general public and other 

Federal Agencies to comment on the 

proposed information collection, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995. 

Ex-Im Bank’s financial institution 

policy holders provide this form to U.S. 

exporters, who certify to the eligibility 

of their exports for Ex-Im Bank support. 

The completed forms are held by the 

financial institution policy holders, only 

to be submitted to Ex-Im Bank in the 

event of a claim filing. A requirement of 

Ex-Im Bank’s policies is that the insured 

financial institution policy holder 

obtains a completed Exporter’s 

Certificate at the time it provides 

financing for an export. 

This form will enable Ex-Im Bank to 

identify the specific details of the export 

transaction. These details are necessary 

for determining the eligibility of claims 

for approval. Ex-Im Bank staff and 

contractors review this information to 

assist in determining that an export 

transaction, on which a claim for nonpayment has been submitted, meets all 

of the terms and conditions of the 

insurance coverage. 

The Exporters Certificate for Use with 

a Short Term Export Credit Insurance 

Policy is a requirement of Ex-Im Bank’s 

policies. The form can be viewed at 

www.exim.gov/pub/pending/eib94– 

07.pdf 

DATES: Comments should be received on 

or before July 20, 2012 to be assured of 

consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Comments maybe submitted 

electronically on www.regulations.gov 

or by mail to Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street NW., 

Washington, DC 20038 Attn: OMB 

3048–0041. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Titles and Form Number: EIB 94–07 

Exporters Certificate for Use with a 

Short Term Export Credit Insurance 

Policy. 

OMB Number: 3048–xxx. 

Type of Review: Regular. 

Need and Use: Ex-Im Bank developed 

the referenced form to obtain exporter 

certification regarding the export 

transaction, U.S. content, non-military 

use, non-nuclear use, compliance with 

Ex-Im Bank’s country cover policy, and 

their eligibility to participate in USG 

programs. These details are necessary to 

determine the legitimacy of claims 

submitted. It also provides the financial 

institution policy holder a check on the 

export transaction’s eligibility, at the 

time it is fulfilling a financing request. 

Affected Public: This form affects 

entities involved in the export of U.S 

goods and services. 

Annual Number of Respondents: 

2,500. 

Estimated Time per Respondent: 10 

minutes. 

Number of forms reviewed by Ex-Im 

Bank: 23. 

Note Ex-Im Bank only reviews this 

form when a claim is submitted. In 

Fiscal Year 2011, 23 claims were filed. 

Government Annual Burden Hours: 2 

hours. 

Government Cost: $77.44. 

Frequency of Reporting or Use: As 

needed. 

Sharon A. Whitt, 

Agency Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2012–14997 Filed 6–19–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6690–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Information Collection(s) Being 

Reviewed by the Federal 

Communications Commission for 

Extension Under Delegated Authority, 

Comments Requested 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork burden and as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3502– 

3520), the Federal Communications 

Commission invites the general public 

and other Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s). 

Comments are requested concerning: 

whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimates; ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; ways to minimize 

the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology; and ways to 

further reduce the information 

collection burden on small business 

concerns with fewer than 25 employees. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES