alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATIONS

I,Patrick E. McCready, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ChannellCommercial Corporation;

2.                     Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                     Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter  (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.                     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)             Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 15, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Patrick E. McCready |
|--------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|               |   | Patrick E. McCready     |
|               |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
Exhibit 24.8
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
  (1)
    
    To execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigneds
capacity as a director and/or officer of Spartech Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the Company), Form 10-K in accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules thereunder;(2)
    
    To do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which
may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 10-K complete
and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such form with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or similar
authority; and(3)
    
    To take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to, in
the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being understood
that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the undersigned
pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall contain such
terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such
attorney-in-facts discretion.
   th
 /s/ Craig A. WolfangerSignatureCraig A. WolfangerPrint Name
EXHIBIT
99.1

# CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Republic Resources, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Melman, the Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | By: /s/ David A. Melman
David A. MelmanPrincipal Executive Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March
24, 2003
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. FR AN CI SC O PRE CI AD O- RAM I RE Z, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 12- 30197 D. C . No . 3 : 1 1 - c r - 0 0 4 0 8 - HZ ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

O r e gon M ar c o A . H e rna nde z , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M ay14, 2013 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T H O M A S , an dM U R G U IA , C i rcu i tJu d g es. F r a nc i s c o P r e c i a do- R a m i r e z appe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nta nd chal l enges hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on and 2 7-m on th sent ence for i l l egalre entryof a de port e d a l i e n, i n vi ol at i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1326. P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia ,



# FI LED MA Y17 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 30197 2 38 6 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ), P re ci ado-R am i re z’ s c ou nselhas f i l ed a bri ef

st at i ng thatthere a r e n o g r o u n d s f

o rr e lie f , a lo n g w ith am o tio n to w ith d r aw a s c o u n s e l o f r e c o r d . W e have provi ded P re ci ado-R am i re z the op po rtun i ty t o fi l e apro se s up pl em ent al br i e f . N o pr o s e s uppl e m e nt a l br i e f ha s be e n f

i l e d. T he gove rnm e ntha s f i l e d a m o tio n to d is m is s th e ap p e a l. P r e c i a do- R a m i r e z ha s w a i ve d hi s r i ghtt o appe a l hi s c onvi c t i on and s e nt e nc e . O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 488 U .S . 7 5 , 8 0 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le is s u e a s to th e v a lid ityo f th e w a iv e r . See U ni te d States v . W

at s on , 5 8 2 F .3 d9 7 4 , 9 8 6 - 8 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . W e a c c o r d in g ly g r a n t th e g o v e rn m e n t’s m o tio n to d is m is s th e ap p e a l. C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D. DI S MI S S E D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          21,620
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,441
<ALLOWANCES>                                       984
<INVENTORY>                                      7,164
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,437
<PP&E>                                       1,298,458
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,420,757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          141,780
<BONDS>                                        733,576
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           249
<OTHER-SE>                                     537,751
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,420,757
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               328,515
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  121,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               151,988
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,074
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,728
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,371
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,357
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,357
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.75
        

</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 19

- 00043

- CV

IN RE SWAN PRODUCTS, LLC

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

JOHN E. NEILL

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed April 17, 2019

[OT06]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

         STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF PARADYNE NETWORKS, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Paradyne Networks, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sean E.
Belanger, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Sean E. Belanger
---------------------

Sean E. Belanger
Chairman , President and Chief Executive Officer
March 20, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2698 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2698

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                        indoor tanning services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2015

Mr. Holding (for himself, Mr. Royce, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Long, Mr. Knight, 
    Mr. Whitfield, Mr. Nunes, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. 
 Ashford, Mr. Peterson, Mr. Benishek, Mr. Walberg, and Mrs. Blackburn) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                        indoor tanning services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tanning Tax Repeal Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON INDOOR TANNING SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Subtitle D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking chapter 49 and by striking the item relating to 
such chapter in the table of chapters of such subtitle.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to services performed after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### McCOY et al. v. STATE.

No. 17225.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 13, 1935.

Reynold M. Gardner, of Amarillo, for appellants.

Lloyd-W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for robbery. The punishment assessed against each appellant was 17 years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The indictment properly charges the offense. The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Exhibit 99.1

#### CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned
hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. (the
Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

- the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

|Date: November 14, 2002                                             
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael J. Gaughan                                              
|Michael J. Gaughan
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

|Date: November 14, 2002                                
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Gage Parrish                                       
|Gage Parrish
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
To:

Cc:

Bcc:

Subject: Re: Pope - Response to PM Data Request

From: Arden Pope <cap3@byu.edu>

To: Rebecca Yang/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 10/30/2009 01:45 PM

Subject: RE: Request for PM Air Quality Data

With regards to data from the following paper:

Pope et al. (2008). “Relation of heart failure hospitalization to exposure to fine particulate air pollution.” Amer. J. of

Cardiology 102 (9): 1230-1234. 

The data presented below are for the entire study period as discussed in the paper and as 

summarized more briefly in Table 1 of the paper.

Ogden, PM2.5, monitored 

+ imputed

SLC, Hawthorne

PM2.5,

monitored +imputed

Provo/Orem, Lindon

PM2.5

monitored + imputed

N 5,108 5,109 5,113

95th percentile 29.2 33.6 30.7

96th percentile 31.6 36.8 34.0

97th percentile 34.5 42.3 38.9

98th percentile 38.3 48.2 47.1

99th percentile 47.3 58.1 58.5

Max 108 104 142

Hope this is what you need.

Arden Pope

From: Yang.Rebecca@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Yang.Rebecca@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:50 AM

To: cap3@email.byu.edu

Cc: Stanek.Lindsay@epamail.epa.gov; Hassett-Sipple.Beth@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Request for PM Air Quality Data 
Dear Dr. Arden Pope,

My name is Rebecca Yang and I am writing to you on behalf of Dr. Lindsay Stanek and Ms. Beth 

Hassett-Sipple of the EPA. On October 20, 2009, an email was sent to you requesting descriptive 

statistics on the air quality distribution data for PM2.5 and/or PM10-2.5 for your study listed below.

The October 20th email stated that someone would be contacting you before November 2nd as follow up 

to the email request. If your schedule permits, I would like to speak with you on Friday, October 30th in 

order to obtain the descriptive statistics for your study listed below. The statistics of most interest for the 

24-hour concentrations of PM2.5 and/or PM10-2.5 are the following: 

- 95th percentile

- 96th percentile

- 97th percentile

- 98th percentile

- 99th percentile

- maximum concentration value 

If your study contains thoracic coarse PM data, then the PM10 data for the same statistics as above are 

also requested. 

In respect for your time, if there is another researcher/co-author who may be able to handle this air quality 

data request (i.e., has easier access to the data), I would greatly appreciate his/her name and contact 

information. Please also note that any data you provide will be placed in the EPA's public docket. 

Thank you so much for your understanding and support! I apologize for the inconvenience but the data

you provide is critical for inclusion in the EPA's Integrated Science Assessment and Policy Assessment

Document for Particulate Matter. Unless I hear from you otherwise, I look forward to speaking with you on 

Friday, October 30th! Thank you for your time! 

Sincerely,

Rebecca Yang 

Student Services Contractor

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

National Center for Environmental Assessment-RTP

PH: (919) 541-2655

Pope et al. (2008). “Relation of heart failure hospitalization to exposure to fine particulate air pollution.” Amer. J. of

Cardiology 102 (9): 1230-1234.
Order filed October 10, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00523-CR

KENNETH LYNN SCHROEDER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 10th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10CR2872

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 

34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's exhibits # 1 and # 20.

The clerk of the 10th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this court the 

original of State's exhibits # 1 and # 20, on or before October 21, 2013. The Clerk of this court 

is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of 

this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of 

State's exhibits # 1 and # 20, to the clerk of the 10th District Court.

PER CURIAM
Jim Wilkinson - Re: Ozone Authority SIP 

The lead notice may be removed on December 6, 2012. The ozone notice may be removed on January 5, 2013. Thanks

>>> Samantha Kappalman 11/8/2012 1:47 PM >>>

Ok, we'll need to prioritize what's up there. Some things will need to come off. For both of your SIP links, please send us 

an email when we can come down.

Samantha Kappalman

Director of Communications

Maryland Department of the Environment

410-537-3010

443-934-1023 (cell)

www.mde.state.md.us

>>> Mary Jane Rutkowski 11/8/2012 1:44 PM >>>

Good Afternoon

Next week we will need to post another State Implementation Plan (SIP) on our web site. I need to have a link to the SIP 

on the MDE home page under Notices and Alerts, "110 Ozone Authority SIP". This link needs to be in place for a minimum 

of 30 days from the date we post the documents. We should have the documents on the server early next week.. Thanks 

for your assistance!

From: Mary Jane Rutkowski

To: Kappalman, Samantha

Date: 11/8/2012 1:53 PM

Subject: Re: Ozone Authority SIP

CC: Thunell, Roger

file:///C:/Users/msarros/AppData/... Page 1 of 1 12/21/2012
# C_2022197EN.01000201.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10571 – HSBC SINGAPORE / TEMASEK / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 197/02)

On 11 May 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10571. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10571. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 10.14

nStor Technologies, Inc.

October 1, 2004

NameAddress

Dear Mr. _____________:

We have agreed to the following amendments to that certain 8% Convertible Promissory Note, dated September 8, 2003, in the amount of $__________ (the “Note”), payable by nStor Technologies, Inc. to________________, copies of which are attached hereto. 

The maturity date of the Note is hereby extended from September 30, 2004 to April 15, 2006 (“Maturity”).  Interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum will accrue on the unpaid Principal Amount and bepayable monthly.

Except as set forth in this letter, the Note remains unmodified and in full force and effect. 

Please indicate your concurrence with the foregoing.

Sincerely,

                                                                      Name

/s/ Todd Gresham                                              Agreed By:___________________Todd Gresham                                                                       NamePresident                                                                                Title

**6190 Corte Del Cedro * Carlsbad * California * 92009(760) 683-2500 * fax (760) 683-2544**