alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023195EN.01000901.xml

| 2.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/9

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.106893

(2023/C 195/08)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 24.4.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.106893 |
| Member State | Denmark |
| Region | Denmark |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Modification SA.103095. Compensation to fish processing and wholesale undertakings for the loss of turnover caused by the reduction of supply in 2021 due to Brexit. |
| Legal basis | Order on the amendment of the order on administration, eligibility, accounting, audit and control etc. in relation to the payment of aid from the Brexit Adjustment Reserve |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Fisheries and aquaculture, Other measures (Fisheries Guidelines point 5.7) |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 40 000 000 DKK
  Annual budget: 40 000 000 DKK |
| Intensity | 100,0  % |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Processing and preserving of fish, crustaceans and molluscs, Wholesale of other food, including fish, crustaceans and molluscs |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Danish Fisheries Agency |
| Nyropsgade 30, 1780 Copenhagen |

Date of adoption of the decision

24.4.2023

Aid number

SA.106893

Member State

Denmark

Region

Denmark

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Modification SA.103095. Compensation to fish processing and wholesale undertakings for the loss of turnover caused by the reduction of supply in 2021 due to Brexit.

Legal basis

Order on the amendment of the order on administration, eligibility, accounting, audit and control etc. in relation to the payment of aid from the Brexit Adjustment Reserve

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Fisheries and aquaculture, Other measures (Fisheries Guidelines point 5.7)

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 40 000 000 DKK

Annual budget: 40 000 000 DKK

Intensity

100,0  %

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Processing and preserving of fish, crustaceans and molluscs, Wholesale of other food, including fish, crustaceans and molluscs

Name and address of the granting authority

Danish Fisheries Agency

Nyropsgade 30, 1780 Copenhagen

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 19

- 00527

- CR Elizabeth Anne HERBST , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 187th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CR10291W Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 18, 2019
DIS MISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
On October 2, 2018 , appellant was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision in accordance with a plea

- bargain agreement. On July 9, 2019, the trial court held a hearing on the State’s fi rst amended motion to adjudicate guilt and revoke appellant’s community supervision. The trial court denied the State’s motion and modified the conditions of appellant’s deferred adj u dication community supervision

. On July 25, 2019 , appellant filed a notic e of appeal, seeking to appeal the trial court ’ s order modifying the conditions of h er deferred adjudication community supervision.04

- 19

- 00527

- CR

- 2

- “[ A ] ppeals from the modification of terms of deferred adjudication, like appeals from the modification of terms of probat ion, are not authorized by the legislature. ” Quaglia v. State , 906 S.W.2d 112, 113 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1995, no pet.) ; see Davis v. State , 195 S.W.3d 708,
71 1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) ( noting “an order modifying the terms or conditions of deferred adjudication is not in itself appealable. ”)

. Because it appeared that we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant ’s counsel filed a response acknowl edging that this court lacks jurisdiction

over this appeal

. Accordingly, t his appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Frederick Louis Pugh v. Barbara Winfield-Pugh

Appellate case number: 01-22-00007-CV

Trial court case number: 21-FD-2012

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 1 of Galveston County

On January 10, 2022, Frederick Louis Pugh (Frederick) filed a notice of appeal from 

the final decree of divorce entered by the trial court on December 20, 2021. But the trial 

court set aside the divorce decree on January 10, 2022, when it issued an order rescinding 

the divorce decree.1 Consequently, it appears:

1. the divorce decree is not effective,

2. there is not a final divorce decree in this case, and

3. the original petition for divorce filed by Barbara Winfield-Pugh (Barbara) is 

still unresolved and needs a decision in the trial court.

This Court generally has jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments and 

specific interlocutory orders that the Legislature has designated as appealable orders. See 

Industrial Specialists, LLC v. Blanchard Refining Co., No. 20-0174, 2022 WL 2082236, at 

*2 (Tex. June 10, 2022); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); see 

also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE §§ 51.012, 51.014. Because it appears that the divorce 

decree was set aside and therefore there is not a final judgment, the Court may dismiss this 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction.2 See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

1 Typically, for 30 days after it signs a judgment, the trial court has authority to set aside the 

judgment, even if an appeal has been filed. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(d). 

2 A dismissal for lack of jurisdiction will not prevent Barbara or Frederick from getting a 

final divorce decree in the trial court or later filing a timely appeal of a final divorce decree. 
2

Unless Frederick files a response demonstrating, by citation to the law, that this 

Court has jurisdiction over the appeal, this appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). A failure to respond will also result in dismissal. TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(c). Frederick’s response, if any, is due in this Court on or before September 

30, 2022.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s Sarah Beth Landau

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 20, 2022
#### BARNETT v. STATE.

No. 18756.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 27, 1937.

Art Schlofman, of Dalhart, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary, punishment assessed being confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years.

The indictment appears to be in proper form. The record is before this court without statement of facts. The only bills of exception complain at the refusal of the court to give certain special charges which were requested by appellant. In the absence of a statement of facts, it is impossible for this court to appraise such bills.

No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 347 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2984 

[Report No. 114–452] 

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide that any inaction by the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission that allows a rate change to go into 

effect shall be treated as an order by the Commission for purposes 

of rehearing and court review. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2015 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself, Mr. NEAL, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. MOULTON, Mr. KEATING, Mr. LYNCH, Ms. 

CLARK of Massachusetts, Mr. WELCH, Ms. KUSTER, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. 

CICILLINE, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. CAPUANO, and Ms. TSONGAS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

MARCH 14, 2016 

Additional sponsors: Mr. HUDSON, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. BOST, 

and Ms. KELLY of Illinois 

MARCH 14, 2016 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2984 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide that any inaction by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that 

allows a rate change to go into effect shall be treated 

as an order by the Commission for purposes of rehearing 

and court review. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2984 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Ratepayer Ac5 countability, Transparency, and Efficiency Standards 

6 Act’’ or the ‘‘Fair RATES Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE FEDERAL POWER ACT. 

8 Subsection (d) of section 205 of the Federal Power 

9 Act (16 U.S.C. 824d(d)) is amended by adding at the end 

10 the following: ‘‘Any absence of action by the Commission 

11 that allows a change to take effect under this section, in12 cluding the Commission allowing the sixty days’ notice 

13 herein provided to expire without Commission action, shall 

14 be treated as an order issued by the Commission accepting 

15 such change for purposes of section 313.’’. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 347 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2984 

[Report No. 114–452] 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide that 

view. mission for purposes of rehearing and court reeffect shall be treated as an order by the ComCommission that allows a rate change to go into any inaction by the Federal Energy Regulatory 

MARCH 14, 2016 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ESPOSITO PARTNERS

275 Madison Avenue

14th Floor

New York, NY 10016

(212) 537-3896

September 11, 2014

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING AND REGULAR MAIL

United States Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Withdrawal of Counsel 

FAA Docket No. 2014-0400

Dear Sir or Madam:

We are writing in relation to the above-referenced matter to notify the FAA that this firm no 

longer represents AeroCine, LLC.

Please direct all further communications to:

Brian Streem

Managing Member

AeroCine, LLC

405 Douglas Street

Suite 2

Brooklyn, NY 11217

brian@flyaerocine.com

(201) 317-8784

Thank you.

Respectfully submitted,

Frank M. Esposito, Esq.

Esposito Partners, PLLC

275 Madison Avenue

14th Floor

New York, NY 10016

cc (via e-mail): Brian Streem
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

TINA MARIE STOKES, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2495 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed November 27, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; William Sites, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Joanna B. Conner, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
KHOUZAM, C.J., and SALARIO and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Ju ly 25 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk July 25 , 2018

156622(65)

W A FOOTE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL,

d/b/a ALLEGIANCE HEALTH,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 156622

v COA: 333360

Kent CC: 15

- 008218

- NF

MICHIGAN ASSIGNED CLAIMS PLAN

and MICHIGAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE

PLACEMENT FACILITY,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

JOHN DOE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant s

- appell ees to extend the time

for filing their supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted

for filing if submitted on or before August 17 , 2018

.
# C_2023123EN.01001501.xml

| 5.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/15

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11027 – HSBC / AXA / INTU MILTON KEYNES)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 123/13)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | HSBC Bank plc (‘HSBC’, United Kingdom), |
| --- | --- |

—

HSBC Bank plc (‘HSBC’, United Kingdom),

| — | AXA S.A. (‘AXA’, France), |
| --- | --- |

—

AXA S.A. (‘AXA’, France),

| — | intu Milton Keynes Limited (‘intu MK’, United Kingdom), controlled by intu Shopping Centres plc (in administration, ‘ISC’). |
| --- | --- |

—

intu Milton Keynes Limited (‘intu MK’, United Kingdom), controlled by intu Shopping Centres plc (in administration, ‘ISC’).

AXA and HSBC will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of intu MK.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | HSBC, part of the globally active HSBC group, is a banking and financial services company, |
| --- | --- |

—

HSBC, part of the globally active HSBC group, is a banking and financial services company,

| — | AXA is a global insurance group, active in life, health and other forms of insurances, as well as in investment management, |
| --- | --- |

—

AXA is a global insurance group, active in life, health and other forms of insurances, as well as in investment management,

| — | intu MK owns and manages Midsummer Place shopping centre in Milton Keynes, United Kingdom. Intu MK will only be active in the United Kingdom and will have no activities in the EEA. |
| --- | --- |

—

intu MK owns and manages Midsummer Place shopping centre in Milton Keynes, United Kingdom. Intu MK will only be active in the United Kingdom and will have no activities in the EEA.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11027 – HSBC / AXA / INTU MILTON KEYNES

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                     DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                           6,547,804
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    781,829
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     24,395
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 7,349,217
<PP&E>                                                           17,995,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   4,965,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   21,294,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            2,053,743
<BONDS>                                                          2,922,703
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      1,133
<COMMON>                                                         1,578,996
<OTHER-SE>                                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     21,294,143
<SALES>                                                          4,566,930
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 4,659,309
<CGS>                                                            2,527,048
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    20,033,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 230
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               701,377
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (15,895,067)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (15,895,067)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (15,985,036)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (1.22)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-27721, 33-43523, 333-47985, 33-49887,
33-54935, 33-59152) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-00451, 333-27799, 333-27805,
333-27807, 33-30317, 333-36739, 333-67367) of PECO Energy Company and Subsidiary
Companies of our report dated February 29, 2000 except for certain information
included in Notes 2 and 4, for which the dates are March 24, 2000 and March 16,
2000, respectively relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, PA
March 30, 2000
! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 !! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 "! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 #! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 $! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 %! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 &! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 '! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 (! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 )! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 !! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 "! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 #! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 $! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 %! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 &! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 '! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 (! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! )! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 !! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! !! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! "! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! #! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! $! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! %! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! &! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! '! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 ! (! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " )! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 "! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " !! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " "! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " #! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " $! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " %! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " &! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " '! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 " (! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # )! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 #! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # !! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # "! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # #! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # $! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # %! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # &! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # '! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 # (! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 $ )! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 $

4 $ ( ' 5 0 $ 4 $ &

- & . &

6 7 $ 0 .! # $ % & $ ' % ( ) * + , - . / $ 0 1

* 2 3 2 $ !

8 $ 9 : , ; $ <

= > ? @ < A < = ? B C D A < @ D E A ? F ? A A + B < = > A + D + = = < A C C G H = + D C D G

= > I J 3 I + A K L ? @ H < = < = L
= ? B C D > E + K > = + + M G C L ? = F C D < N +