alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To : Cc: Bcc: Subject: Re: Pope - Response to PM Data Request

From: Arden Pope <cap3@byu.edu> To: Rebecca Yang/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 10/30/2009 01:45 PM Subject: RE: Request for PM Air Quality Data

With regards to data from the following paper:

Pope et al. (2008). “Relation of heart failure hosp italization to exposure to fine particulate air pol lution.” Amer

. J

. of Cardiology 102 (9): 1230-1234.



### The data presented below are for the entire study p eriod as discussed in the paper and as summarized more briefly in Table 1 of the paper.

Ogden, PM2.5, monitored + imputed SLC, Hawthorne PM2.5, monitored +imputed Provo/Orem, Lindon PM2.5 monitored + imputed N 5,108 5,109 5,113
95 th 

### percentile 29.2 33.6 30.7

96 th 

### percentile 31.6 36.8 34.0

97 th 

### percentile 34.5 42.3 38.9

98 th 

### percentile 38.3 48.2 47.1

99 th 

### percentile 47.3 58.1 58.5
Max 108 104 142

Hope this is what you need.

Arden Pope

From: Yang.Rebecca@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Yang.Rebecca@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Tuesday , October 27, 2009 10:50 AM To: cap3@email.byu.edu Cc: Stanek.Lindsay@epamail.epa.gov; Hassett-Sipple.Beth@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Request for PM Air Quality DataDear Dr. Arden Pope,

My name is Rebecca Yang and I am writing to you on behalf of Dr. Lindsay Stanek and Ms. Beth Hassett-Sipple of the EPA. On October 20, 2009, an email was sent to you requesting descriptive statistics on the air quality distribution data for PM2.5 and/or PM10-2.5 for your study listed below.

The October 20th email stated that someone would be contacting you before November 2nd as follow up to the email request. If your schedule permits, I would like to speak with you on Friday, October 30t h in order to obtain the descriptive statistics for your study listed below. The statistics of most interes t for the 24-hour concentrations of PM2.5 and/or PM10-2.5 are the following: - 95th percentile - 96th percentile - 97th percentile - 98th percentile - 99th percentile - maximum concentration value

If your study contains thoracic coarse PM data, then the PM10 data for the same statistics as above are also requested.

In respect for your time, if there is another resea rcher/co-author who may be able to handle this air quality data request (i.e., has easier access to the data) , I would greatly appreciate his/her name and conta ct information. Please also note that any data you pr ovide will be placed in the EPA's public docket.

Thank you so much for your understanding and suppor t! I apologize for the inconvenience but the data you provide is critical for inclusion in the EPA's Integrated Science Assessment and Policy Assessment Document for Particulate Matter. Unless I hear fro m you otherwise, I look forward to speaking with yo u on Friday, October 30th! Thank you for your time!

Sincerely,

Rebecca Yang Student Services Contractor U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Center for Environmental Assessment-RTP PH: (919) 541-2655

Pope et al. (2008). “Relation of heart failure hosp italization to exposure to fine particulate air pol lution.” Amer

. J

. of Cardiology 102 (9): 1230-1234.
#### Lang IDEN v. STATE.

No. 16797.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 30, 1934.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 3, 1934.

See, also, 75 S.W.(2d) 261.

Hood D. Kizziar and W. H. Dipscomb, both of San Angelo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.-

Conviction is *for*possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; punishment being one year in the penitentiary.

Peace officers armed with a search warrant went to appellant’s home and found therein a quantity of gin, alcohol, and whisky. As the sheriff was leaving the room with some of the jugs in his arms, appellant knocked one of them out of the officer’s arms to the floor. No issue arises under the facts. Appellant did not testify, and no evidence was offered in his hehalf. The only question presented for review is the sufficiency of the affidavit and warrant issued thereunder *to*authorize the search. We see no necessity for setting out at length the affidavit. We have been unable to discover any defect therein. The affidavit appears to be supported by many authorities which will be found cited in Schwartz v. State, 120 Tex. Cr. R. 252, 46 S.W.(2d) 985.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Quarterly Report of Park
Bancorp, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2010, (the Report), I, David A. Remijas, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David A. RemijasDavid A. RemijasChairman and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 15, 2010




26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<MULTIPLIER>1000
       
<S>                          <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             NOV-24-1995
<PERIOD-END>                  NOV-24-1995
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<CASH>                         1301
<SECURITIES>                   3271
<RECEIVABLES>                  3928
<ALLOWANCES>                    468
<INVENTORY>                    3054
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              11459
<PP&E>                         3029
<DEPRECIATION>                 2660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                11828
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          1287
<BONDS>                           0
<COMMON>                       1533
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0
<PREFERRED>                       0
<OTHER-SE>                     8862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  11828
<SALES>                       12681
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              12681
<CGS>                          8218
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 12358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               (412)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 67
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 735
<INCOME-TAX>                    297
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             438
<DISCONTINUED>                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                         0
<NET-INCOME>                    438
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .30
        

</TABLE>
| /s/Marilyn A. Alexander       | Director | February      26, 2010 |
|-------------------------------|----------|------------------------|
| Marilyn      A. Alexander     |     | Date                   |
|                          |     |                   |
| /s/Peter Arkley               | Director | February      26, 2010 |
| Peter      Arkley             |     | Date                   |
|                          |     |                   |
| /s/Robert Band                | Director | February      26, 2010 |
| Robert      Band              |     | Date                   |
|                          |     |                   |
| /s/Willard W. Brittain, Jr.   | Director | February      26, 2010 |
| Willard      W. Brittain, Jr. |     | Date                   |
|                          |     |                   |
| /s/Robert A. Kennedy          | Director | February      26, 2010 |
| Robert      A. Kennedy        |     | Date                   |
|                          |     |                   |
| /s/Michael R. Klein           | Director | February      26, 2010 |
| Michael      R. Klein         |     | Date                   |
|                          |     |                   |
| /s/Robert L. Miller           | Director | February      26, 2010 |
| Robert      L. Miller         |     | Date                   |
|                          |     |                   |
| /s/Raymond R. Oneglia         | Director | February      26, 2010 |
| Raymond      R. Oneglia       |     | Date                   |
|                          |     |                   |
| /s/Donald D. Snyder           | Director | February      26, 2010 |
| Donald      D. Snyder         |     | Date                   |
|                          |     |                   |
| /s/Ronald N. Tutor            | Director | February      26, 2010 |
| Ronald      N. Tutor          |     | Date                   |
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1990
<CASH>                                         1,822
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  21,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                   580
<INVENTORY>                                    77,549
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,171
<PP&E>                                         6,414
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,774
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          81,206
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       114
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148,183
<SALES>                                        64,780
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               64,780
<CGS>                                          46,852
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  46,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               128
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,926
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,774
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,497
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,277
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,277
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.20



</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 6, 2023
No. 04-22-00871-CR Sean Michael FOXX , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR8672A Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant Sean Michael Foxx entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to which he pleaded nolo contendere to the charged offense. The trial court imposed a sentence onJanuary 13, 2014 in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a pleabargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(a)(2). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id . The clerk’s record includes the written plea bargain agreement. See id. 25.2(d). The record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. 25.2(a)(2). The record also appears to support the trial court’s certification that Appellant does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). The record further demonstrates Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. Therefore, a notice of appeal was due February 12, 2014, or the notice and a motion for extension of time to file, were due fifteen days later on February 27, 2014. T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.2(a)(1), 26.3. The record contains a notice of appeal file stamped December 9, 2022. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3. We therefore order appellant to file a response, by January 26, 2023 , establishing (1) the notice of appeal was timely filed by mail and (2) an amended certification showing he has the right to appeal has been made part of the appellate record. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d), 26.2, 26.3, 37.1. If a supplemental clerk’s record is required to show appellant has the right to appeal, appellant must request a supplemental record from the trial court clerk and file a copy ofthe request with this court. If appellant fails to satisfactorily respond to this order within the time

provided, the appeal will be dismissed.
We order all appellate deadlines suspended until further order of the court. We further order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record and the court reporter.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 6th day of January, 2023.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2


Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The undersigned, the Chief Administrative Officer, as acting Chief Financial
Officer of Colonial Properties Trust, our general partner, hereby certifies
that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)           the Form 10-Q of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the
              period ended March 31, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the
              Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report) fully complies
              with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
              Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)           information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership.







/s/  John P. Rigrish
---------------------------
     John P. Rigrish
     Chief Administrative Officer,
     as acting Chief Financial Officer,
     May 7, 2004
# Qualit yAircraf t •r^ARTMENTO F MlPORTATiO N U.S
. Departmen t o fTransportatio n : CPERATiON S Docke t Managemen t Syste m 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve
. S E ' ' ^ ' ^ ' ^ ' W
. Buildin g Groun d Floor , Roo m W12-14 0 Washington , D

C 2059 0 Re : Exemptio n Reques t - " QIA A(Part 135 ) & LO A91.14 7 \ a m writin g thi s lette rt o reques t a n exemptio n t o 1 4 CF R Part 12 1 Appendice s I & J an d 4 9 CF R Part 40. 1 a m requestin g t o ge t bot h o fou ranti-dru g program s int o on e pool , a s state d b yth e FA Adru g abatemen t divisio n ' " Ft
. Worth , TX
. an d b yMr
. Stev e Hech t ~ FAA
. Th e reaso n fo rthi s relie fi s t o lowe rth e amoun t o fpaperwor k tha t i t take s t o kee p u p t o dat e wit h multipl e dru g programs . B

ycombinin g th e tw o anti-dru g program s w e curren t hav e i n place , thi s wil l hav e n o advers e effect s o n eithe rou rsafet ysensitiv e employee s o rth e public
. W e woul d remai n i n th e sam e effectiv e poo l an d woul d maintai n ou rcurren t standards accordingly
. I fyo u hav e an yfurthe rquestion s o rcomments , I ca n b e reache d a t th e following : Qualit yAircraf t ~ QIA A 116 1 Ceda rDriv e Midlothian , T

X 7606 5 972.723.536 4 Diraa@Aol.co m

Denni s Lauterbach , J r Qualit yAircraf t

QuaCit yL^ucka^t

116 1 Ceda rDriv e I Midlothian , T X 7606 5 972.723.536 4 Offic e j 972.775.695 6 Fa xSHIPPE D FE B 1 0 IQl t
Certificate dated August 31, 2004



 Exhibit 4.1 
  
 August 31, 2004 
  
 ON Semiconductor Corporation 
 5005 E. McDowell Road 
 Phoenix, Arizona 85008 
  
 The undersigned, as trustee (the “Trustee”) under the Indenture dated as of August 4, 1999, as amended (the “Indenture”), between ON Semiconductor Corporation, a Delaware corporation (formerly
known as SCG Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation) (the “Company”), Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“SCI LLC”), SCG (Malaysia
SMP) Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, SCG (Czech) Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, SCG (China) Holding Corporation, a Delaware
corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, Semiconductor Components Industries Puerto Rico, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of SCI LLC, SCG International Development LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
and a wholly owned subsidiary of SCI LLC, Semiconductor Components Industries of Rhode Island, Inc., a Rhode Island corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of SCI LLC and Semiconductor Components Industries International of Rhode Island, Inc., a
Rhode Island corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of SCI LLC and U.S. Bank National Association (successor to State Street Bank and Trust Company), as trustee, relating to the 12% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 (the “Notes”),
which Notes were the subject of a notice of redemption dated May 4, 2004, hereby certifies that: 
  

	(a)	the conditions of Section 8.01 of the Indenture have been fulfilled by (i) the delivery to the Trustee for cancellation by the Trustee of all outstanding Notes (other than Notes
which have been replaced or paid pursuant to Section 2.07 of the Indenture), (ii) the payment by the Company of all sums due and payable under the Indenture and the Notes, and (iii) the delivery to the Trustee of an Officers’ Certificate and an
Opinion of Counsel, each stating that all conditions precedent relating to the satisfaction and discharge of the Indenture have been complied with; and 

  

	(b)	the Indenture has been released, cancelled, discharged and satisfied. 

  
 All capitalized terms not herein defined the meanings ascribed to them in the Indenture. 
  

			
	U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE
		
	 	 	 /s/ CAUNA M. SILVA


	By:	 	Cauna M. Silva
	Title:	 	Vice President
Trademark Assignment (08/06/2004)



  
 Exhibit 10.5

  
 TRADEMARK ASSIGNMENT 
  
 This Trademark Assignment (“Assignment”) is made and entered
into this 6th day of August, 2004 (“Effective Date”), by and between STEPHEN A. WYNN, an individual (hereinafter “Wynn”) and WYNN RESORTS HOLDINGS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, with offices at
3145 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada (“Holdings”). 
  
 R E C I T A L S 
  

	A.	Wynn and Holdings are entering into a Surname Rights Agreement, dated the date hereof (the “Surname Rights Agreement”), which Surname Rights Agreement addresses the
use and registration of the WYNN Mark in connection with Resorts (each, as defined in the Surname Rights Agreement). 

  

	B.	Pursuant to the Surname Rights Agreement, Wynn has agreed to assign, and Holdings has agreed to acquire, all right, title, and interest that Wynn possesses worldwide in the WYNN
Mark in connection with Resorts. 

  
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Wynn hereby transfers, assigns, conveys, delivers, and sets over to Holdings all of Wynn’s right, title, and interest worldwide in and to the WYNN Mark in
association with Resorts, all goodwill associated therewith, and all causes of action (either in law or equity), and the right to sue, counterclaim, and recover for past, present, and future infringement, dilution, or misappropriation of the Wynn
Mark in connection with Resorts, and all rights corresponding thereto throughout the world. Wynn further agrees to cause to be performed such lawful acts and to execute such further assignments and other documents as Holdings may request to
effectuate fully this Assignment and to enable this Assignment to be recorded in any and all jurisdictions throughout the world. 
  
 In Witness Whereof, the parties have caused this Assignment to be duly executed as of the Effective Date. 
  

									
	WYNN:	 	 	 	HOLDINGS:
			
	 	 	 	 	WYNN RESORT HOLDINGS, LLC
	/s/    STEPHEN A.
WYNN          	 	 	 	 By VALVINO LAMORE, LLC,

	Stephen A. Wynn	 	 	 	 Its Sole Member

	 	 	 	 	 By WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED

	 	 	 	 	 Its Sole Member

					
	 	 	 	 	 	 	By	 	/s/    MARC SCHORR        
					
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Its	 	C.O.O.
Exhibit 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Enterprises (the "Company") certifies that:

the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

February 22, 2006

/s/Steven D. Davis

______________________

Steven D. Davis

Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
[AETNA LOGO]                                    INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION


                                                 RICHARD L. HUBER
To            Frederick C. Copeland, Jr.

Date          May 4, 1999

Subject       Employment Agreement

         This memo is to confirm that in lieu of benefits under the Company's
severance and salary continuation benefits plan and upon receipt from you of a
customary release of employment-related claims and covenants in form and
substance satisfactory to the Company, we have agreed that the Company shall
guarantee you a minimum of 52 weeks salary continuation in the event your
employment is ever terminated under circumstances which call for the payment of
benefits under the Company's severance and salary continuation benefits plan,
and for a period of 156 weeks if your employment is terminated by the Company
for any reason other than misconduct following a "change in control" as defined
in the Company's severance plan.




Aetna Inc.





By:  /s/Richard L. Huber
     -------------------
     Richard L. Huber