alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF TV FILME, INC. AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996,
AND THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS 
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          19,618
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,503
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,125
<INVENTORY>                                      2,983
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,803
<PP&E>                                          38,622
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,199
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,298
<BONDS>                                            200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           102
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,537
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,269
<SALES>                                         21,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,287
<CGS>                                            6,092
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,996
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   821
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (307)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (847)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (847)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (847)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
### MEMORANDUM

**To:** Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket id: OAR
- 2013
- 0602 **From:** Region 5, EPA **Summary** : The question at the bottom of the email was raised by a staff member from the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity **From:** Cain, Alexis [ mailto:cain.alexis@epa.gov] **Sent:** Wednesday, October 29, 2014 1:03 PM **To:** Wasiniewska, Karolina **Cc:** Rupp, Mark; Czerniak, George; Strine, Lora; Doug Scott; Bremer, Kristen; Newman, Erin **Subject:** FW: Call with Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Hello Karolina
— so that we can get the right people from USEPA on the call to answer your questions, could you clarify whether your question relates only to the Clean Power Pla n proposal, or if the questions also relate to the treatment of renewable energy in the Notice of Data Availability released yesterday? If it’s all right with you, we will invite Illinois EPA in the discussion when we set up a call. Alexis Cain US Envir onmental Protection Agency, Region 5 77 W. Jackson Blvd (AT

- 18J) Chicago, IL 60604 (312) 886

- 7018 fax (312) 697

- 2046 cain.alexis@epa.gov **From:** Rupp, Mark [ mailto:Rupp.Mark @epa.gov] **Sent:** Tuesday, October 28, 2014 7:41 PM **To:** Wasiniewska, Karolina **Cc:** Hughes, Alexandra; Czerniak, George; Strine, Lora; Doug Scott **Subject:** Re: Call with Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Hi, Karolina. Thank you for this
. I'm including a few folks on this email: Doug Scott with your Commerce Commission as well as George Czerniak, the Air Division Director out of our Region 5 office in Chicago. I'll let Region 5 drive the best date/time to connect with your folks. And Lora Strine (also cc'd) in EPA headquarters can work to support George with any headquarters participants he may like. Mark On Oct 28, 2014, at 5:06 PM, Wasiniewska, Karolina < Karolina.Wasinie wska@illinois.gov > wrote: Good Afternoon,I hope this email finds you well.

The Assistant Deputy for Energy & Recycling at the Illinois DCEO, Molly Lunn, is currently working on the 111(d) comments and has some questions about how EPA has intended to treat renewables and RECs under the proposed rule. Her question has to do specifically with how EPA proposes to treat RECs under 111(d), and how that treatment might differ if a state submitted its own plan vs. a regional plan. I wanted to reach out a nd see if there was a time later this week or early next week that would work for you for a call regarding this matter, either Thursday morning, Friday afternoon, or Monday morning. I look forward to hearing from you. Best, Karolina Wasiniewska Fed eral Liaison, James H. Dunn Fellow Governor Pat Quinn, State of Illinois Karolina.Wasiniewska@illinois.gov (P) 202 624 7760 (F) 202 724 0689
EXHIBIT 11
                                        
                      SPARTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)


Fiscal Year Ended
                                                                      
                                               Oct 31,   Nov. 1,   Nov. 2,
                                                 1998      1997     1996
NET EARNINGS                                                               
                                                                  
 Basic and Diluted net earnings applicable to                     
 common shares                                 $ 33,720  $ 25,493 $ 18,317
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                        
 Weighted average common shares outstanding      26,807    26,418    23,714
 Add: Shares issuable from assumed exercise of                             
 options and warrants                             1,802     1,420     1,160
 Diluted weighted average common shares                                    
 outstanding                                     28,609    27,838    24,874
NET EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE                                              
 Basic                                         $   1.26   $   .96   $   .77
 Diluted                                       $   1.18   $   .92   $   .74
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Robert F. McCadden, the Chief Financial Officer of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge.


(1) the Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K/A”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:March 25, 2014/s/ Robert F. McCaddenName:Robert F. McCaddenTitle:Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit (23)




         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As  independent public accountants, we hereby consent to  the
incorporation  by reference of our report dated  January  18,
1997, included in Owens Corning's annual report on Form  10-K
for  the  year  ended December 31, 1996, into  the  Company's
previously filed Registration Statements, File Nos.  33-9563,
33-9986, 33-9987, 33-18262, 33-20997, 33-27209, 33-31687, 33-
48707, 33-57886, 33-60487 and 333-09367.







                            ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Toledo, Ohio
March 19, 1997
# C_2023195EN.01001601.xml

| 2.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/16

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.105243

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 195/15)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 6.1.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.105243 |
| Member State | Latvia |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | State Aid SA.105243 (2022/N) — Latvia TCF: Loans and leases guarantee scheme (amendment to SA.103400) |
| Legal basis | Cabinet Regulation No. 377 of 21 June 2022 on the guarantee programme to mitigate the economic consequences of the Russian military aggression against Ukraine |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Guarantee |
| Budget | Overall budget: 12 500 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Development Finance Institution Altum |
| Doma laukums 4, Riga |

Date of adoption of the decision

6.1.2023

Aid number

SA.105243

Member State

Latvia

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

State Aid SA.105243 (2022/N) — Latvia TCF: Loans and leases guarantee scheme (amendment to SA.103400)

Legal basis

Cabinet Regulation No. 377 of 21 June 2022 on the guarantee programme to mitigate the economic consequences of the Russian military aggression against Ukraine

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Guarantee

Budget

Overall budget: 12 500 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Development Finance Institution Altum

Doma laukums 4, Riga

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 38265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16283]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending June 4, 
2011

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0103.
    Date Filed: May 31, 2011.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC23/123 Europe-South West Pacific, Mail Vote 684 
Adoption, Composite Resolutions 017jj & 017h, e-Tariffs, 2-20 May 2011, 
Intended Effective Date: 1 September 2011.

 Renee V. Wright,
 Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2011-16283 Filed 6-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #3309]
 As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on November 27, 2000, I find that Caddo and Grady Counties in the State of Oklahoma constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and flooding beginning on October 21, 2000 and continuing through October 29, 2000. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on January 26, 2001, and for loans for economic injury until the close of business on August 27, 2001 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 3 Office, 4400 Amon Carter Blvd., Suite 102, Fort Worth, TX 76155. In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small businesses located in the following contiguous counties may be filed until the specified date at the above location: Blaine, Canadian, Cleveland, Comanche, Custer, Garvin, Kiowa, McClain, Stephens, and Washita in the State of Oklahoma. The interest rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners with credit available elsewhere
7.375Homeowners without credit available elsewhere
3.687Businesses with credit available elsewhere
8.000Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere
4.000Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit available elsewhere
6.750For Economic Injury: Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 330911 and for economic injury the number is 9J7900. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) Dated: November 29, 2000. Herbert L. Mitchell, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 00-31062 Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### PHOENIX ASSUR. CO., LIMITED, OF LONDON v. SHEPHERD et ux.

No. 1811—7445.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section B.

March 20, 1940.

Bryan & Bryan, of Houston, for plaintiff in error.

Fulbright, Crooker & Freeman and Paul Strong, all of Houston, for defendants in error.

SLATTON, Commissioner.

L. T. Shepherd et ux. sued Phoenix Assurance Company, Ltd., of London to recover upon a fire insurance policy covering a house situated at 1521 Fulton Street in the city of Houston.

The insurer defended upon an alleged breach of the following provision of the policy: “This entire policy shall be void if the building described be or become vacant and so remain for a period exceeding ten days or if a dwelling be or become vacant for a period exceeding ten days or unoccupied for a period exceeding thirty days.”

Issues were submitted to a jury and determined in favor of Shepherd et ux. Upon such verdict a judgment was rendered against the insurance company. On appeal the Galveston Court of Civil Appeals-affirmed the judgment. 115 S.W.2d 992. The insurance company was granted writ of error.

The question to be determined is whether under the evidence the house was vacant for a period exceeding ten days so as to avoid the policy under the quoted provision thereof.

The house was used as a dwelling and as-a boarding house. Tenant Dickey moved out of the house on July 2, 1933. The fire occurred on July 25, 1933. Thus it is clear that the provision as to occupancy does not apply. When the tenant moved out of the house there was left an old trunk with various articles of clothing contained therein which belonged to the tenant. In addition to the trunk there was left in the house .the following property which belonged to the owner Shepherd: A number of chairs, tables, dishes, cooking utensils, two ice boxes and a gas heater. Such.property was-*997estimated to be of the value of $150 to $200 according to the various witnesses.

This court, by refusing the application for writ of error in the case of Southern National Insurance Company v. Cobb, Tex.Civ.App., 180 S.W. 155, approved the following definition of the word “vacant” as used in a fire insurance policy: “Vacant” means entire abandonment, deprived of contents, empty. The words “vacant” and “unoccupied” are not synonymous as used in the policy in the present case. The trial court, in submitting the issue of vacancy to the jury, having defined the term substantially in accordance with the above approved definition, we are unable to say, as a matter of law, that the above evidence does not support the finding of the jury that the house was not vacant within the quoted provision of the policy. It follows therefore that the judgments rendered by the lower courts must be affirmed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001029300
<NAME>  CFC Services Corp
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                       538
<INVENTORY>                                     42,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,205
<PP&E>                                          44,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,699
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,683
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### RAY v. STATE.

No. 18697.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 6, 1937.

John B. Littler and Charlie Sullivan, both of Big Spring, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of aggravated assault, and his punishment *362was ass'essed at confinement in the county-jail for a term of nine months and a fine of $300.

The record before us is without a statement of facts or bills of exception. There are, however, a number of objections to the court’s charge, but, in the absence of a statement of facts, we cannot properly appraise the same. The indictment seems to be regular and in due form. Hence no reversible error is perceived.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

MORROW, P. J., absent.
Amendment No. 2 to Rights Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 FLIR SYSTEMS, INC. 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT 
  
 This Amendment No. 2 to the Rights Agreement (this “Amendment No. 2”) is made and entered into as of this fourth day of November, 2004,
by and between FLIR Systems, Inc., an Oregon corporation (the “Company”), and Mellon Investor Services LLC (formerly ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C.) (the “Rights Agent”). Capitalized terms used in this
Amendment No. 2 and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in the Rights Agreement. 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Rights Agent are parties to the Rights Agreement dated as of June 2, 1999, as amended as of June 5, 2003 (the “Rights
Agreement”); 
  
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the
Rights Agreement as set forth herein; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing and the mutual agreements herein set forth, the parties hereby agree as follows: 
  
 1. Section 1(l) of the Rights Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
  
 “(l) “Purchase Price” shall mean the price
(subject to adjustment as provided herein) at which holder of a Right may purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Preferred Stock (subject to adjustment as provided herein) upon exercise of a Right, which price shall be $225.00.” 

 
 2. This Amendment No. 2 shall become effective as of the date first
written above. 
  
 3. This Amendment No. 2 may be executed in any
number of counterparts, each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original, and all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. 
  
 4. In all respects not inconsistent with the terms and provisions of this Amendment No. 2, the Rights Agreement is hereby
ratified, adopted, approved and confirmed. In executing and delivering this Amendment No. 2, the Rights Agent shall be entitled to all of the privileges and immunities afforded to the Rights Agent under the terms and conditions of the Rights
Agreement. 
  
 5. If any term, provision, covenant, or restriction
of this Rights Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction or other authority to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the terms, provisions, covenants and restrictions of this Amendment No. 2, and of the Rights Agreement,
shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto having caused this Amendment No. 2 to be duly executed as of the
date and year first above written. 
  

			
	FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ James A. Fitzhenry


	Name:	 	James A. Fitzhenry
	Title:	 	Sr Vice President, Corporate
	 	 	Operations and Law
	
	MELLON INVESTOR SERVICES LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Thomas L. Cooper


	Name:	 	Thomas L. Cooper
	Title:	 	Client Service Manager
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Zones, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Firoz H. Lalji, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: November 10, 2004 /S/ FIROZ H. LALJI
             
             Firoz H. Lalji
             Chairman and Chief Executive Officer