alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022009EN.01000301.xml

| 10.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/3

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2022/C 9/03)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 8.12.2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 8.12.2021 - 31.12.2021 |
| Member State | France |
| Stock or Group of stocks | HER/4AB. (incl. HER/*4N-S62) |
| Species | Herring (Clupea harengus) |
| Zone | Union and Norwegian waters of 4 north of 53°30’ N |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 22/TQ92 |

Date and time of closure

8.12.2021

Duration

8.12.2021 - 31.12.2021

Member State

France

Stock or Group of stocks

HER/4AB. (incl. HER/*4N-S62)

Species

Herring (Clupea harengus)

Zone

Union and Norwegian waters of 4 north of 53°30’ N

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

22/TQ92

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the quarter ended September
30, 2006 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership.
 By:
    
    
    /s/
    Weston M. AndressWeston M. AndressPresident and Chief Financial Officer ofColonial Properties Trust, the general partner ofColonial Realty Limited PartnershipNovember 8, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      19,380,625
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,810,155
<ALLOWANCES>                                   821,127
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,686,537
<PP&E>                                      10,371,413
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,317,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,784,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,734,171
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,668
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,040,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,784,970
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,635,294
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,750,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,883,989
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               100,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (444,494)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,655,168)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,068,830
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,723,998)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.35)
        

</TABLE>
#### SANGER OIL & REFINING CO. v. CRISMAN.

No. 1147.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

Oct. 7, 1932.

Davidson, Doss & McMahon, of Abilene, for appellant.

Stinson, Hair, Brooks & Duke, of Abilene, for appellee.

HICKMAN, C. J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory •order of the judge of the ?ourt below’appointing a receiver on an ex parte hearing without- notice to appellant. By the order of appointment, the receiver was authorized to .enter upon and take possession of appellant’s property. There are two reasons apparent on the face of the transcript why the receiver should not have been appointed: First, the petition alleged that, prior to the institution 'of the suit, appellant had made a bill of sale to all of its property to one A. N. Toncray, •which bill of sale was of record in Taylor county. There were allegations that this sale was fraudulently made, but the question of whether or not same was subject to be set aside on account of fraud could be determined only in a proceeding in which Toncray was a party. The trial court could' not properly appoint a receiver to take possession of, and assume control over, property of one not a party to the proceeding.

The second reason why the appointment should not have been made without notice to appellants is because appellee’s petition failed to allege facts showing that there was such pressing necessity for haste that he would likely suffer irreparable loss if the appointment was delayed until notice was given the •defendant and a hearing had. Such allegations are essential to authorize the appointment of a receiver without notice. Security Land Co. v. South Texas Development Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 142 S. W. 1191; Simpson v. Alexander (Tex. Civ. App.) 188 S. W. 285; Arnold v. Meyer (Tex. Civ. App.) 198 S. W. 602; Hodges Drilling Co. v. Tyler (Tex. Civ. App.) 233 S. W. 548; White Star, Inc., v. English (Tex. Civ. App.) 286 S. W. 255; Delcambre v. Murphy (Tex. Civ. App.) 5 S.W.(2d) 789; Zanes v. Lyons (Tex. Civ. App.) 36 S.W.(2d) 544; Myerscough v. Garrett (Tex. Civ. App.) 45 S.W.(2d) 1003; Pray-Chamberlain Producers v. Barnhill (Tex. Civ. App.) 46 S.W.(2d) 462.

The receivership is dissolved without prejudice to appellee’s right to again seek the same decree upon amended pleadings.

Reversed, and receivership dissolved.
Opinion issued May 16 , 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 21
- 00674
- CV

——————————— IN RE BARBARA J. STANFIELD, INDIVIDUALLY, AS A DIRECT
ACTION PLAINTIFF, AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF INTERVENOR TIG TRANSPORTATION, LLC , Relat or

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Barbara J. Stanfield, Individually, as a direct

- action plaintiff, and Derivatively, on behalf of Intervenor TIG Transportation, LLC, filed a petition for writ of mandamus, challenging (1) the trial court’s September 20, 2021 order granting the motion to show authority filed by real party in interest, Timothy Cannon, Jr. and TIG Transportation, LLC; (2) the trial court’s October 4, 2021 order2

denying relator’s motion for reconsideration of the September 20, 2021 order; and the trial court’s two November 17, 2021 orders granting real party in interest leave to pay his attorney’s fees and ordering payment to real party in interest his former weekly salary. 1 We deny the petition. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.

1 The underlying case is Barbara J. Stanfield v. Timothy Cannon, Jr. , cause number 2021

- 20472 , pending in the 215th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Elaine Palmer presiding.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2014

s0421 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2014

148359

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148359

COA: 317711

Gogebic CC: 2012

- 000231

- FC

RANDY ROBERT ERICKSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 15, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### HAGGINS v. STATE.

No. 19345.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 2, 1938.

*192J. H. Martin, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding- Judge.

The offense is burglary of a private residence at night; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The only question presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. The State’s testimony is to the effect that Garnett Reed and his family left their home in Corpus Christi, about 7:30 p. m., on September 15, 1936, for the purpose of attending a picture show. They locked their house before leaving it. Upon their return between 9:30 and 10 o’clock that night they discovered that their house had been burglarized. Entry was made through a window, where the screen had been removed, the window pushed up, and the curtains torn down. -The bed clothing had been taken from both beds. Footprints were found in the sandy loam below the window which indicated that the person had come into and gone out of the house. The witness measured the footprints, which were twelve inches in length. Among the articles taken from the house was a bedspread. This was introduced in evidence upon the trial and identified by Reed as belonging to him. The bedspread was new, and the witness identified it by its color and design.

The witness, Ruby Stephens, testified that she purchased a bedspread from the appellant for which she paid him $2. The bedspread was new and had never been laundered, but that she washed it while in her possession. Two officers came to her house in company, with the appellant and got the bedspread.

Butler, a deputy sheriff, testified that he went to the home of Ruby Stephens in company with the appellant and there found the bedspread after having been told by the appellant where the stolen property might be found. According to the officer, the appellant said: “I robbed so many places and got so much stuff, I don’t know what all; and I have sold it, and what I can remember, I will take you around and show you where it is.”

The officer identified the bedspread introduced in evidence' upon the trial as the one which he had obtained from the home of Ruby Stephens.

The appellant did not testify upon the trial, nor did he introduce any witnesses in his behalf.

Deeming the evidence sufficient to support the conviction, the judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3010 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3010

 To prohibit assistance provided under the program of block grants to 
States for temporary assistance for needy families from being accessed 
  through the use of an electronic benefit transfer card at any store 
                    that offers marijuana for sale.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2015

 Mr. Reichert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit assistance provided under the program of block grants to 
States for temporary assistance for needy families from being accessed 
  through the use of an electronic benefit transfer card at any store 
                    that offers marijuana for sale.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preserving Welfare for Needs Not 
Weed Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF ELECTRONIC BENEFIT TRANSFER CARD TO 
              ACCESS TANF ASSISTANCE AT ANY STORE THAT OFFERS MARIJUANA 
              FOR SALE.

    (a) Prohibition.--Section 408(a)(12)(A) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 608(a)(12)(A)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (ii);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of clause (iii) and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(iv) any establishment that offers 
                        marihuana (as defined in section 102(16) of the 
                        Controlled Substances Act) for sale.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 2 years after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MULTIPLE
ZONES, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDING
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,245
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,701
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,033
<INVENTORY>                                     36,538
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,077
<PP&E>                                          25,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,797
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,328
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,538)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,171
<SALES>                                        462,647
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               462,647
<CGS>                                          418,720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  418,720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,632
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 573
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (278)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (108)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (170)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (170)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1








Chief Executive Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, R. Eugene Taylor, Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Date:           November 15, 2010
/s/ R. Eugene TaylorR. Eugene Taylor

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to TIB Financial Corp. and will be retained by TIB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### SERVE D AUGUS T 29 , 20 ] 1 •-'CpARLMEN T O F



## . .:|;\NSFORW[O N U.S . DEPARTMEN T OFTRANSPORl'ATIO N ••^-'-•'^t: ' OPERAHON S OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C -''' • ^''' ^ "-^ 0 A S

- 3 b I N TH E MATTERO F D & M CUSTO M INJECTIO N MOLDIN GCORPORATIO N FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B E ASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-2011-067 9 NOTIC E O FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No . 2009-GL-70-0314 ) ha s been assigne dto Administrativ e Law Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . All futur e pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , andthe othe r

person s on th e attache dServic e List . 

# L

_J ^ Ronni e A . Yode

r Chie f Administrativ e La Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFDMSNo . FAA-20il-067 9 (Civi l Penall y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Michae l TeoHlovich , Presiden t D& M Custo mInjectio n Moldin g Corporatio n db aD& M Plastic s Corporation , Responden t 15 0 Frenc hRoa d Burlington , IL6010 9 Kat e Barber , Comp/ainan l ' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Grea t Lake s Region , AGL-7 B Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 230 0 Eas t

Devo n Avenu e DC S Plaines,I L6001 8 TEL : 847-294-786 2 FAX : 847-294-749 8 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Adminisirativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistant . FAX : 202-366-753 6

Service wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier , use th

e followin g address : I-edera

l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2 W1000 , Washington, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .



### - 2 -
# C_2023301EN.01000801.xml

| 25.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/8

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.104412

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 301/07)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 5.1.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.104412 |
| Member State | France |
| Region | REUNION |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aide à la restructuration octroyée à Air Austral |
| Legal basis | |
| Type of measure | Ad Hoc Case
  Air Austral |
| Objective | Restructuring undertakings in difficulty |
| Form of aid | Debt write-off, Tax deferment, Other forms of equity intervention |
| Budget | Overall budget: 119 300 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 119 300 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | From 5.1.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Air transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministère de l'Economie et des Finances |
| 139 rue de Bercy |

Date of adoption of the decision

5.1.2023

Aid number

SA.104412

Member State

France

Region

REUNION

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aide à la restructuration octroyée à Air Austral

Legal basis

Type of measure

Ad Hoc Case

Air Austral

Objective

Restructuring undertakings in difficulty

Form of aid

Debt write-off, Tax deferment, Other forms of equity intervention

Budget

Overall budget: 119 300 000 EUR

Annual budget: 119 300 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

From 5.1.2023

Economic sectors

Air transport

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministère de l'Economie et des Finances

139 rue de Bercy

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA

---
### The Honorable Warren K. Urbom, United States District Judge 1 

### for the District of Nebraska. ___________ No. 95-2745

___________ Richard M. Willmes, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Nebraska. * United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 8, 1996 Filed: April 16, 1996

___________ Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Richard M . Willmes, having pled guilty to conspiracy to manufacture and dis tribute methamphetamine, was sentenced to a prison term of 32 4 months and a five-year period of supervised release. His conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal. The present appeal is taken by Willmes fr om the order of the District Court denying Willmes's 28 U.S.C. 1 § 2255 motion for relief, in which Willmes claim ed that in the proceedings attendant to his guilty plea and sentencing he was denied the effectiv e assistance of counsel. Having considered the briefs, the record on appeal, and the arg uments of the parties, we conclude that the District Court did

### -2-

not err in finding that Willmes failed to show prejudice in his ineffectiv e assistance of counsel claim. Because no error o f law appears, and because an opinion by this Court would lack precedential value, we affirm the orde r of the District Court on the basis of that Court's thorough and well
reasoned opinion. AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.