alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Manuel V. Pangilinan,
President and CEO of Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge, that our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our financial condition and results of operations.

March 18, 2016



/s/    Manuel V.
PangilinanMANUEL V. PANGILINAN
President and CEO(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
**Exhibit 21**

**SUBSIDIARIESOF THE COMPANY**

|                                           | ** ** | **WHERE**  | ** ** | **% OF SHARES** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------------|------------|------------|------------|---------------------------|------------|
| **NAME**                                  | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **INCORPORATED**          | ** ** | **OWNED** | ** ** |
| The Pep Boys Manny  Moe & Jack   |       |       |       |                      |       |   |   |   |   |
| of California                             |       |       |       |                      |       |   |   |   |   |
| 3111 W. Allegheny Avenue                  |       |       |       |                      |       |   |   |   |   |
| Philadelphia, PA 19132                    |       |       | California |                      |       |   | 100 | % |   |
| Pep Boys—Manny,  Moe & Jack |       |       |       |                      |       |   |   |   |   |
| of  Delaware, Inc.                   |       |       |       |                      |       |   |   |   |   |
| 3111 W. Allegheny  Avenue                 |       |       |       |                      |       |   |   |   |   |
| Philadelphia, PA 19132                    |       |       | Delaware   |                      |       |   | 100 | % |   |
| Pep Boys—Manny,  Moe & Jack |       |       |       |                      |       |   |   |   |   |
| of Puerto Rico, Inc.                 |       |       |       |                      |       |   |   |   |   |
| 3111 W. Allegheny Avenue                  |       |       |       |                      |       |   |   |   |   |
| Philadelphia, PA 19132                    |       |       | Delaware   |                      |       |   | 100 | % |   |
| Colchester  Insurance Company             |       |       |       |                      |       |   |   |   |   |
| 7 Burlington  Square                      |       |       |       |                      |       |   |   |   |   |
| Burlington, VT 05401                      |       |       | Vermont    |                      |       |   | 100 | % |   |
| PBY Corporation                           |       |       |       |                      |       |   |   |   |   |
| Suite 946                            |       |       |       |                      |       |   |   |   |   |
| 1105 North Market Street                  |       |       |       |                      |       |   |   |   |   |
| Wilmington, DE 19899                      |       |       | Delaware   |                      |       |   | 100 | % |   |
| Carrus Supply  Corporation                |       |       |       |                      |       |   |   |   |   |
| 1013 Centre Road                          |       |       |       |                      |       |   |   |   |   |
| Wilmington, DE  19805                     |       |       | Delaware   |                      |       |   | 100 | % |   |
|                                           |            |            |            |                           |            |  |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 12-2

                  PECO ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
           COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
                    AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS
                           ($000s, except ratio data)


                                                                       12 MONTHS
                                                                           ENDED
                                                                        12/31/99
                                                                     -----------

NET INCOME                                                             $576,814

ADD BACK:
  INCOME TAXES:
  OPERATING INCOME                                                      359,160
  NON-OPERATING INCOME                                                   (5,058)
                                                                     -----------
  NET TAXES                                                             354,102

  FIXED CHARGES:
  INTEREST APPLICABLE TO DEBT                                           374,518
  ANNUAL RENTALS ESTIMATE                                                 3,272
  CAPITALIZED INTEREST                                                    6,983
                                                                     -----------
  TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                                   384,773

EARNINGS REQUIRED FOR PREFERRED DIVIDENDS:
  DIVIDENDS ON PREFERRED STOCK                                           12,176
  ADJUSTMENT TO PREFERRED DIVIDENDS*                                      7,475
                                                                     -----------
                                                                         19,651
                                                                     -----------

FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS                                  $404,424
                                                                     ==========

EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND
  FIXED CHARGES                                                      $1,315,689
                                                                     ==========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
  AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS                                3.24
                                                                     ==========


 * ADDITIONAL CHARGE EQUIVALENT TO EARNINGS REQUIRED
   TO ADJUST DIVIDENDS ON PREFERRED STOCK TO A PRE-TAX BASIS
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |

|                      |
|----------------------|
|                      |  |
| Date: March 29, 2019 | /s/ SAMUEL H. NORTON |
|                 | Samuel H. Norton |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer |
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED TYLER NEFF , A ppellant ,
v. Case N o. 5D 22

- 540 LT Case No

. 2018- CF

- 15488

STATE O F FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decisio n filed Nove mber 8 , 2 022 Appeal from t he C ircuit C ourt for Orange County , Bob L eBl anc , J udge. Matthew J

. M etz, P ublic D efender, a nd Allison A

. H avens, Assistant P ublic D efender, Day tona Beac h, for Appellant. Ashley M oody, A ttorney G eneral, Tallahassee, an d Kriste n L. Davenport , Assistant A ttorney G eneral, D aytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

COHEN , TRAVER and NARDELLA , JJ. , concur.
**EXHIBIT 32(a)**
**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Sherrill Stone, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer ofPeerless Mfg. Co. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal yearended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in theReport.
/s/ SHERRILL STONE
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Zones, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald P. McFadden, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      May
      11, 2007








/S/
                RONALD P MCFADDENRonald
                P. McFaddenChief
                Financial Officer
# C_2023178EN.01000501.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/5

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10860 – ADVENT / GFK)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 178/05)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | NielsenIQ (‘NIQ’, United States), controlled by Advent International (‘Advent’, United States), |
| --- | --- |

—

NielsenIQ (‘NIQ’, United States), controlled by Advent International (‘Advent’, United States),

| — | GfK SE (‘GfK’, Germany). |
| --- | --- |

—

GfK SE (‘GfK’, Germany).

Advent, indirectly through NIQ, will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of GfK.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

The same concentration was already notified to the Commission on 20 March 2023 but the notification was subsequently withdrawn on 20 April 2023.

2.

| — | NIQ is active in the provision of market research services worldwide. NIQ is controlled by Advent, a private equity investor headquartered in the United States, |
| --- | --- |

—

NIQ is active in the provision of market research services worldwide. NIQ is controlled by Advent, a private equity investor headquartered in the United States,

| — | GfK is active in the provision of market research services worldwide. |
| --- | --- |

—

GfK is active in the provision of market research services worldwide.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10860 – ADVENT / GFK

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
701 A.2d 845

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Gary S. MANDEL, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG, No. 29,

Sept. Term, 1997.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Oct. 22, 1997.

Order

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Gary S. Mandel, to indefinitely suspend the Respondent from the practice of law.

The Court, having considered the Petition, it is this 22nd day of October 1997

ORDERED that the Respondent, Gary S. Mandel, be and he is hereby and indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective on the 22nd day of October, 1997, and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Gary S. Mandel from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-713.
EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     PEM International, Ltd., incorporated under the laws of the State of
Delaware, is 100% owned by the Registrant.

     PEM International (Singapore) Pte Ltd., incorporated under the laws of the
State of Delaware, is 100% owned by the Registrant.

     PEM Management, Inc., incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware,
is 100% owned by the Registrant.

     PEM Investments, Inc., incorporated under the laws of the State of
Delaware, is 100% owned by the Registrant.

     PEM World Sales, Ltd., incorporated under the laws of Bermuda, is 100%
owned by the Registrant.

     Arconix Group, Inc., incorporated under the laws of Delaware, is 100% owned
by the Registrant.


                     INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     Arconix/Singapore Pte Ltd., incorporated under the laws of Delaware, is
100% owned by Arconix Group, Inc.

     Arconix/U.K. Ltd., incorporated under the laws of Delaware, is 100% owned
by Arconix Group, Inc.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-51064 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SERGIO ZAPATA-AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-03-CR-267-1-WWJ

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Sergio Zapata-Aguilar appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Zapata-Aguilar contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Zapata-Aguilar maintains that heNo. 03-51064 -2- pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Zapata-Aguilar acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08202013[9/13/2013 12:40:33 PM]

Get Email Updates Contact Us

Home • The Administration • Office of Management and Budget

REGULATION &

INFORMATION POLICY

About OIRA

Information Policy

Federal Collection of

Information

Regulatory Matters

Meetings and Outside

Communication

Reports to Congress

For Agencies

Statistical Programs &

Standards

Meeting Record

Meeting Record Regarding: Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Stationary

Sources: Electric Utility Generation Units

Date: 8 / 20 / 2013

Name Affiliation Client (if applicable)

Nick Hudson EPA

Alex Barron EPA

Jim Laity OMB/OIRA

Drew McConville CEQ

Dom Mancini OMB/OIRA

Anne Finken CEQ

Bruce Rodan OSTP

Benjamin Longstreth NRDC

David Amiger NRDC

About OMBlog The Budget Management Regulation & Information Policy Legislative Information Join OMB Contact OMB

Home

The White House Blog

Photos & Videos

Photo Galleries

Video

Performances

Live Streams

Podcasts

Briefing Room

Your Weekly Address

Speeches & Remarks

Press Briefings

Statements & Releases

White House Schedule

Presidential Actions

Legislation

Nominations &

Appointments

Disclosures

Issues

Civil Rights

Defense

Disabilities

Economy

Education

Energy & Environment

Ethics

Equal Pay

Foreign Policy

Health Care

Homeland Security

Immigration

Refinancing

Rural

The Administration

President Barack Obama

Vice President Joe Biden

First Lady Michelle Obama

Dr. Jill Biden

The Cabinet

White House Staff

Executive Office of the

President

Other Advisory Boards

About the White House

Inside the White House

Presidents

First Ladies

The Oval Office

The Vice President's

Residence & Office

Eisenhower Executive

Office Building

Camp David

Air Force One

White House Fellows

White House Internships

Tours & Events

Mobile Apps

Our Government

The Executive Branch

The Legislative Branch

The Judicial Branch

The Constitution

Federal Agencies &

Commissions

Elections & Voting

State & Local Government

Resources

Federal Register | Join OMB | FOIA | No FEAR Act | OMB Locator | USA.Gov | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site Search
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08202013[9/13/2013 12:40:33 PM]

Service

Seniors & Social Security

Snapshots

Taxes

Technology

Urban and Economic

Mobility

Veterans

Violence Prevention

Women

En español Accessibility Copyright Information Privacy Policy Contact

USA.gov Developers Apply for a Job
#### SCOTT v. STATE.

No. 19748.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 11, 1938.

On Rehearing June 8, 1938.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 12, 1938.

Tom L. Robinson, of Gatesville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for the sale of intoxicating liquor in dry area; punishment, a fine of $100 and confinement in the county jail for a period of twenty days.

The record fails to show that notice of appeal was given and entered upon the minutes of the trial court. In the absence of such a showing, this court is without jurisdiction to hear and determine matters sought to be presented for review. See Long v. State, 3 Tex.App. 321; Lenox v. State, 55 Tex.Cr.R. 259, 116 S.W. 816; Roberts v. State, 99 Tex.Cr.R. 492, 269 S.W. 103; Article 827, C.C.P.

The attempted appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

At a former day we dismissed the appeal in this case because of a defective-record. Since then, the transcript has been perfected, 'showing that notice of appeal was given and entered upon the minutes of the trial court and the appeal is reinstated. However there is no statement of facts in the transcript or accompanying the same. Therefore the case will be disposed of on the record before us.

Appellant’s first contention is that the court erred in declining to sustain his motion to quash the complaint and . We deem information, but he has failed to assign any reason or point out any defect therein in support of his contentionthe complaint and information sufficient to charge appellant with a violation of the local option law.

He has reserved a number of exceptions to the court’s main charge, and also to the court’s refusal to give his requested instructions to the jury. In the absence of a statement of facts, these complaints cannot be appraised.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.