alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 21

                               PECO Energy Company
                                  Subsidiaries


PECO Energy Power Company (PA)

Susquehanna Power Company (MD)

The Proprietors of the Susquehanna Canal (inactive) (MD)

Susquehanna Electric Company (MD)

Eastern Pennsylvania Development Company (PA)

Adwin Equipment Company (PA)

Adwin (Schuylkill) Cogeneration, Inc. (PA)

Adwin Realty Company (PA)

Energy Performance Services, Inc. (PA)

PECO Energy Capital Corp (DE)

Horizon Energy Company (PA)

PECO Wireless, LLC (DE)

Exelon Corporation (PA)

Energy Trading Company (DE)

ATNP Finance Company (DE)

PEC Financial Services, LLC (PA)

NEWHOLDCO Corporation (PA)

Buttonwoods Associates, Inc. (DE)

Route 213 Enterprises, Inc. (DE)
# C_2022427EN.01001801.xml

| 9.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/18

---

EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2021

(2022/C 427/18)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.eea.europa.eu/about-us/documents/annual-accounts/annual-accounts

---
# C_2022427EN.01004101.xml

| 9.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/41

---

EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE COOPERATION

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2021

(2022/C 427/41)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/about-us/budget-and-finance/annual-accounts

---
#### Crosby, Appellee, *v.*Rath et al., Appellants.

(No. 28861

Decided December 24, 1941.)

*Messrs. Stanley é Smoyer,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Payer, Corrigan, Bleiweiss & Cooh, Mr. Martin E. Blum*and *Mr. Timothy F. McMahon,*for appellants.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, and Hart, JJ., concur.
# Official Journal C 316A/24 S

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 316A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5824 September 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 316A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5824 September 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2015/C 316A/1 | Notice of Open Competition — EPSO/AD/321/15 — Administrators in the Field of Audit (AD 5/AD 7) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2015/C 316A/1

Notice of Open Competition — EPSO/AD/321/15 — Administrators in the Field of Audit (AD 5/AD 7)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.30


                                      NOTE

September 30, 2004                                       Los Angeles, California

Address:          11151 Vanowen Street, North Hollywood, CA 91605

    1. BORROWER'S PROMISE TO PAY. In return for monies loaned, we hereby
       acknowledge receipt of, we promise to pay the sum of Seven Hundred Eighty
       One Thousand Four Hundred and Ninety One Dollars and Fifty Five Cents
       ($781,491.55), plus interest, to The Matzuda Corporation.

       We understand that the Lender may transfer this Note. The Lender or
       anyone who takes this Note by transfer and who is entitled to receive
       payments under this Note may determine and direct the actions to be taken
       on behalf of all Note Holders in the event of default or with respect to
       any matters requiring direction or approval of the Note Holders. All
       payments on this Note shall be applied to pro rata in proportion to the
       interest held by each Note Holder.

    2. INTEREST. Interest is to accrue from September 30, 2004. Interest will
       accrue at a yearly rate of 15%. Interest will be charged on unpaid
       principal until the full amount of principal has been paid.

    3. PAYMENTS. Interest Payments are due on the first (1st) of each month, the
       first payment is due November 10, 2004, and is to be paid to the Note
       Holder at P.O. Box 691447, Los Angeles, CA 90069. In the event the
       interest is not received by the 20th of the month, the entire note may be
       called due and payable by the lender.

    4. ATTORNEYS' FEES. In the event that any party hereto should bring any
       action, suit or other proceeding against any other party hereto,
       contesting the validity of this Agreement, or attempting to enforce,
       remedy, prevent or obtain relief from any breach of this Agreement, or to
       rescind, negate, modify, or reform this Agreement, any of the terms or
       provisions hereof, or any of the matters referred to herein, the
       prevailing party shall recover all of such party's attorneys' fees and
       costs incurred in such action.

    5. TERM. This note is due on October 10, 2005, and all principal and unpaid
       interest shall be due and payable at that time. In the event that Robert
       Friedland is no longer a corporate executive of Jill Kelly Productions
       Holding, Inc., the note is due and payable with all accrued interest. If
       the Note and all accrued interest is not paid with fifteen (15) days of
       it becoming due, there will be a ten percent (10%) penalty assessed. This
       loan may be prepaid at any time with no penalty.


                                                    /s/ Ronald C. Stone
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Jill Kelly Productions Holding, Inc.
                                            Ronald C. Stone, CFO
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6506

JUSEL NORTHINGTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOSEPH P. SACCHET; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA97-1220-CCB) Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 25, 1999Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Jusel Northington, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jusel Northington seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Northington v. Sacchet , No. CA-97-1220- CCB (D. Md. Mar. 30, 1999). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit
      32.1**






**Chief
      Executive Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Edward V. Lett, President and Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operation of the Company.







Date:
            November
                9, 2005
            
            /s/
                Edward V. LettEdward
                V. LettPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer




A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to TIB Financial Corp. and will be retained
        by
        TIB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
        or
        its staff upon request.
# C_2022218EN.01000101.xml

| 2.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 218/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 218/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10684 – SWISS LIFE / VAUBAN / WASCOSA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 218/01)

On 13 May 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Redgulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10684. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10684. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# CI2022088EN.01000101.xml

| 24.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 88/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 88/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decisions (CFSP) 2022/265 and (CFSP) 2022/267, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulations (EU) 2022/260 and (EU) 2022/261 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2022/C 88 I/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decisions (CFSP) 2022/265 and (CFSP) 2022/267 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulations (EU) 2022/260 and (EU) 2022/261 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons, entities and bodies should be included in the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for designations of those persons, entities and bodies appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web sites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons, entities and bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address before 1 June 2022:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, 2nd paragraph, and Article 263, 4th and 6th paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 42 I, 23.2.2022, p. 114.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(4)  OJ L 42 I, 23.2.2022, p. 15.

---
# C_2006326EN.01000501.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 October 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-371/04) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Freedom of movement for workers - Post in the civil service - Failure to take account of professional experience and seniority gained in other Member States - Articles 10 EC and 39 EC - Article 7(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68)

(2006/C 326/10)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Rozet and A. Aresu, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: I.M. Braguglia, Agent, and G. Albenzio, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Articles 10 EC and 39 EC and Article 7(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community (OJ, English Special Edition, 1968 (II) p. 475) — Employees of the Italian public service — Failure to take account of the professional experience and seniority acquired in another Member State

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to take into account the professional experience and seniority gained in the exercise of a comparable activity within the public administration of another Member State by a Community worker employed in the Italian civil service, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 39 EC and Article 7(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to take into account the professional experience and seniority gained in the exercise of a comparable activity within the public administration of another Member State by a Community worker employed in the Italian civil service, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 39 EC and Article 7(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 273, 06.11.2004.

1

---
M EETING REPORT

Subject:

Date:

Location:

Attendees:

Larry Albert

Leon Gibson

Dan Fitzgerald

Mike Scholand

Michael Vladimer

Adam Koeppel

Technical information for the U.S. Department of Energy's determination analysis

on battery chargers

August 14th 2006

Black and Decker World Headquarters

701 E. Joppa Rd.

Towson, MD 21286

Black & Decker (BDK), Power Tool Institute (PTI)

BDK

BDK

Navigant Consulting , Inc. (NCI)

NCI

NCI

On August 14th, 2006 Black and Decker held an informal meeting with Team members from

Navigant Consulting, Inc. supporting the Department's determination analysis on battery

chargers (BC) and external power supplies. Black and Decker discussed technical issues

relating to battery chargers and opportunities to improve their efficiency.

Major points covered during the meeting include:

1. Power flowing from the battery charger to the rechargeable battery drives a series of

electro-chemical reactions. Analyzing the energy consumption of these reactions could

present energy savings opportunities.

2. NiCd and NiMH batteries have a significant self-discharge rate and therefore need

charging in maintenance mode. Conversely, Li-Ion does not significantly self-discharge

and therefore does not require charging in maintenance mode.

3. Compared to other battery-powered consumer products, portable power tools can

require large amounts of power at high current.

4. "Continuous" chargers use approximately the same current when charging in active and

maintenance mode.

5. "Terminating" chargers have internal electronics which direct the BC to provide a

relatively large active-mode current that terminates when the battery is charged, and

then changes to a small maintenance-mode current.

6. Multi-voltage BCs provide an important utility to the end-user by allowing batteries of

different voltages to be charged in the same BC. When applying the ENERGY STAR

test procedure, the same BC may have a certain energy ratio (ER) with one battery pack

and then have a different ER for a battery pack with a different voltage. Consequently,

a multi-voltage BC might qualify for ENERGY STAR with a battery pack of one voltage

and not qualify with a battery pack of a different voltage.

1 of 1

EERE-2006-DET-0136 COMMENT 03
Exhibit 32.1
 Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the quarter ended September
30, 2008 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership.
 By:
    /s/ C. Reynolds Thompson, IIIC. Reynolds Thompson, IIIChief Executive Officer of Colonial Properties Trust,
the general partner of Colonial Realty Limited
PartnershipNovember 7, 2008 57
#### McCullough v. state.

No. 19862.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 8, 1938.

Aubrey Morris, of Waco, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offedse is burglary; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for .five years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.'

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
# FILED January 27, 1999 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk ROGER H. BOWLIN, ) ) Petitioner/Appell

ant, ) Appeal No.

) 01-A-01-9805-CH-00246 v. ) ) Davidson Chancery JOHN KNOX WALKUP, ) No. 98-184-II Attorney Gen

eral for the Stat

e ) of Tennessee; ) DONAL CAMPBELL, ) Commissione

r of Correction fo

r ) the State of Tennessee, ) ) Respondents/Appellee. ) ) COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY

AT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE THE HONORABLE CAROL L. McCOY, CHANCELLOR

ROGER H. BOWLIN, Pro Se D.S.N.F. Health Center 7575 Cockrill Bend Industrial Road Nashville, Tennessee 37209-1057 JOHN KNOX WALKUP Attorney General and Reporter ELIZABETH B. MARNEY Assistant Attorney General 425 Fifth Avenue, N

orth Nashville, Tennessee 37243 ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENTS/APPELLEES

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED WILLIAM B. CAIN, JUDGE-2- 

# OPINION On January 21, 1998,

pe titi oner, an incarce

rated prisoner, f

iled a "petition for declaratory

judg ment" against the Attorney General of Tennessee and the Tennessee Commissioner of Co rrections, seekin

g to have Chapter 72, section 1 of the Publ ic Acts of 1955 previ ously codified as

Tennessee Code Annotated section 39- 3901 declared unconsti tutional. In light of the fact tha

t the portion of

the statute of which appellant now pur ports to complain wa s repealed by th

e General Assem

bly of Tennesse

e i n Chapte r 192, section 4 of the P ublic Acts of 1973, a

full five year

s prior to Appellant's indictment on the offenses for which he is now incarcer

ated, there is thus no justiciable

controversy in this case and petitioner has neither standing nor interest in challenging this former statute. Parks v. Alexander , 608 S.W.2d 881 , 885 (Tenn.App.1980). The Chancery Cour

t of Davidson County dismissed the petition in this case observing that petitio ner had only

two remedies for challenging his criminal conviction

in addition to a direct appeal. Such remedies are 1) a petition for a writ of habeas corpus und er Tennessee Code Annotated section 29- 21-101 et seq. and 2) a petition for post conviction relief pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-30-201, e

t seq. The holding of the chance llor is clearly

correct and since no justiciable controversy

is presented under the Declar atory Judgme

nts Act, the dismissal by the chancellor was c

learly correct and sam

e is affirmed. Tenn. Code Ann.§ 29- 14-101-113 (1980). Costs are assessed a

gainst petitioner, R

oger H. Bowlin.

________________________________ WILLIAM B. CAIN, JUDGE-3-

CONCUR:

__________________________________ ____ BEN H. CANTRELL, P

RES. JUDGE, M.S.

__________________________________ ____ PATRICIA J. COTTRELL, JUDGE
I

# n+ %7 June 12, 2009 David Conroy EPA - New

England, Region I 1 Congress Street, Suite 1100 Boston, MA02114-2023 Dear Mr . Conroy: As requested by Susan Lancey, I am attaching copies of the final Rhode Island Air Pollution Control "General Definitions Regulation" and Regulation No. 36, "Control of Emissions fromOrganic Solvent Cleaning," as revised effective October 8, 2008. I am also attaching mark-up copies of these regulations showing the amendments adopted on that date. These regulations are being submitted as a supplement to the materials provided on March 11, 2005 and April 17, 2009 requesting that Regulation No. 36 be approved as a substitute for EPA's "National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Halogenated Solvent Cleaning" (40 CFRPart 63, Subpart T) under the rule substitution provisions of40 CFRPart 63, Subpart E, Section 63.93. Ifyou have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (401) 222- 4700, extension 7012. Very truly yours, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 235 Promenade Street, Providence, RI 02908-5767 TDD401-222-4462

Barbara Morin, Supervising Environmental Scientist Office of Air Resources

~ . " 30%post-consumer fiber