alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3034 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3034

 To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage stamp in honor 
                         of George Henry White.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 2015

 Mr. Butterfield (for himself, Mr. Jones, Mr. Clyburn, Mr. Al Green of 
   Texas, Mr. Cleaver, Ms. Maxine Waters of California, Mr. Scott of 
Virginia, Mr. Lewis, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Ms. Plaskett, Ms. 
 Wilson of Florida, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. Hastings, 
Ms. Eshoo, Ms. Lee, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. Richmond, Mr. Fattah, Mr. 
 Rangel, Ms. Bass, Ms. Norton, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, 
    Mr. Payne, Mr. Clay, Mr. Jeffries, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. Veasey, Mr. 
  Thompson of Mississippi, and Ms. Sewell of Alabama) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage stamp in honor 
                         of George Henry White.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GEORGE HENRY WHITE COMMEMORATIVE POSTAGE STAMP.

    (a) In General.--The Postmaster General shall issue a commemorative 
postage stamp in honor of George Henry White.
    (b) Specific Requirements.--Such stamp--
            (1) shall be issued in the denomination used for first 
        class mail up to one ounce in weight;
            (2) shall bear such designs as the Postmaster General shall 
        determine; and
            (3) shall be placed on sale as soon as practicable after 
        the date of the enactment of this Act and shall be sold for 
        such period thereafter as the Postmaster General shall 
        determine.
                                 <all>
```
#### HACKNEY v. STATE.

No. 16683.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 14, 1934.

R. A. Wilson and Reynold M. Gardner, both of Amarillo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without statement of facts and bills of exception.

In the absence of the evidence, the matters presented in the motion for new trial cannot be appraised.

We have perceived no error in the procedure which would justify a reversal of the judgment. It is therefore affirmed.
NO. 07-07-0104-CR

 07-07-0105-CR

 07-07-0106-CR

 07-07-0107-CR

 07-07-0108-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

MAY 23, 2007

______________________________

ALFONSO DEMETRIO RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 251 DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY; ST

NOS. 17772-C, 17773-C, 17774-C, 17829-C, 18159-C;

HONORABLE DAVID GLEASON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

ORDER ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Appellant Alfonso Demetrio Rodriguez filed a pro se notice of appeal from five

separate judgments convicting him of abandoning a child, kidnapping, unauthorized use

of a motor vehicle, assault on a public servant, and criminal mischief. The clerk’s record

has been filed, and reflects that appellant had appointed counsel at trial. On May 11,
2

2007, appellant filed a letter with this court indicating he has not yet been appointed

counsel to assist with his appeal. 

Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the causes to the 251 District st

Court of Randall County for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize

whatever means necessary to determine the following:

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

2. whether appellant is indigent; and

3. whether the appellant is entitled to appointed counsel.

Should it be determined appellant wishes to prosecute the appeal, is indigent, and

is entitled to an appointed attorney, the trial court shall appoint counsel. If counsel is

appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel

shall be included in an order appointing counsel. If necessary, the trial court shall issue

findings of fact, conclusions of law, and any necessary orders it may enter regarding the

aforementioned issues and cause its findings, conclusions, and orders to be included in

a supplemental clerk’s record. A supplemental record of the hearing, if any, shall also be

prepared. The supplemental clerk’s record and supplemental reporter’s record, if any, shall

be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before June 22, 2007.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 01-4810



# 
D ANNY A LLISONB ATTLE ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge.

(CR-01-30-BO) Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: June 28, 2002 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. J. Frank Bradsher, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM: Danny Allison Battle pled guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(1) (West 2000). He was sentenced to 96 months imprisonment, followed by three years of supervised release. Battle noted a timely appeal and his counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S.738 (1967), addressing whether the district court adequately ascertained that Battle had read and discussed with his attorney the presentence report prior to sentencing, as required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(3)(A), but stating that in his opinion there are no meritoriousissues for appeal. Although notified of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, Battle has not done so. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. Before imposing sentence, a district court must verify that thedefendant and defendant’s counsel have read and discussed the presentence report. United States v. Miller , 849 F.2d 896, 897 (4th Cir. 1988). A district court is not always required to expressly ask whetherthe report has been read and discussed; instead, a statement by counsel or the defendant may demonstrate that the report has been read and discussed by them. United States v. McManus , 23 F.3d 878, 884- 85 (4th Cir. 1994). We find that the record establishes that Battle had read the presentence report and had discussed it with his attorney prior to sentencing. Accordingly, we conclude that the district court complied with Rule 32(c)(A)(3). In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record and find no reversible error. We therefore affirm the judgment. This courtrequires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for 2 U NITED S TATES v. B ATTLEleave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 3 U NITED S TATES v. B ATTLE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INTERIM
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,355,457
<SECURITIES>                                11,535,617
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,876
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,876
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,553,413
<PP&E>                                         668,534
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,786,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,599,146
<BONDS>                                        391,187
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,672
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,789,779
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,786,784
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,755,048
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,305
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,361,178)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,361,187)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,361,178)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.35)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 179 (Monday, September 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 75542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20952]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Notice of Board Meeting

DATES: September 24, 2024 at 10 a.m. EDT.

ADDRESSES: Telephonic. Dial-in (listen only) information: Number: 1-
202-599-1426, Code: 884 634 853 #; or via web: https://www.frtib.gov/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office of 
External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Board Meeting Agenda

Open Session

1. Approval of the August 27, 2024, Board Meeting Minutes
2. Investment Manager Annual Service Review
3. Monthly Reports
    (a) Participant Report
    (b) Investment Report
    (c) Legislative Report
4. Quarterly Reports
    (d) Vendor Risk Management
5. Mid-Year Financial Review
6. Participant Satisfaction Survey

Closed Session

7. Information covered under 5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(9)(B) and (c)(10).

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b (e)(1).

    Dated: September 11, 2024.
Dharmesh Vashee,
General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-20952 Filed 9-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
              ---------------------------------------------------


The Board of Directors of
J. C. Penney Company, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in:  (1) the Registration Statement
(No. 33-28390) on Form S-8;(2) the Registration Statement (No. 33-59666) on Form
S-8; (3)the Registration Statement (No. 33-59668) on Form S-8; (4) the
Registration Statement (No. 33-66070) on Form S-8; (5) the Registration
Statement (No. 33-66072) on Form S-8; (6) the Registration Statement (No. 33-
56995) on Form S-8; (7) the Registration Statement (No. 333-13949) on Form S-8;
(8) the Registration Statement (No. 333-13951) on Form S-8; (9) the Registration
Statement (No. 333-22627) on Form S-8; (10) the Registration Statement (No. 333-
22607) on Form S-8; (11) the Registration Statement (No. 333-33343) on Form S-8;
(12) the Registration Statement (No. 333-27329) on Form S-8; and (13) the
Registration Statement (No. 333-23339) on Form S-3 of J. C. Penney Company, Inc.
of our report dated February 26, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of J. C. Penney Company, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 31, 1998 and
January 25, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended January 31, 1998, which report appears in the 1997 Annual Report to
Stockholders of J. C. Penney Company, Inc., which Annual Report is incorporated
by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of J. C. Penney Company, Inc. for
the year ended January 31, 1998, and  our report dated February 26, 1998,
relating to the financial statement schedule of J. C. Penney Company, Inc. and
subsidiaries for each of the years in the three-year period ended January 31,
1998, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of J. C. Penney
Company, Inc. for the year ended January 31, 1998.



                                      /S/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 


Dallas, Texas
April 30, 1998
# C_2022464EN.01000901.xml

| 6.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 464/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 464/9

---

Notice for the attention of persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/2376 in Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2374 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses

(2022/C 464/08)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/2376 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998 (3) as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2374 (4), concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons should be maintained on the list of persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 and Regulation (EU) 2020/1998. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2020/1998, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 31 July 2023, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, pursuant to Article 10 of Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999, of the list of designated persons and entities.

---

(1)  OJ L 410 I, 7.12.2020, p. 13.

(2)  OJ L 314, 6.12.2022, p. 90

(3)  OJ L 410 I, 7.12.2020, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 314, 6.12.2022, p. 81

---
# C_2023250EN.01000301.xml

| 14.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/3

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107030

(2023/C 250/03)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 1.6.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107030 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | NAVARRA |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Ayuda para los costes de las medidas de control obligatorias que deben aplicar los operadores de producción ecológica en Navarra durante el período 2023-2027 — renovación del régimen SA.44490 |
| Legal basis | Resolución del Director General de Agricultura y Ganadería por la que se aprueban las bases reguladoras de la ayuda a los costes de las medidas de control obligatorias a realizar por los operadores de la producción ecológica de la Comunidad Foral de Navarra, para el periodo 2023-2027. |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Aid for organic farming |
| Form of aid | Subsidised services |
| Budget | Overall budget: 1 200 000 EUR |
| Intensity | 100,0  % |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2027 |
| Economic sectors | Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Gobierno de Navarra-Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente |
| C/González Tablas, 9 — 4a planta 31005 PAMPLONA (Navarra) |

Date of adoption of the decision

1.6.2023

Aid number

SA.107030

Member State

Spain

Region

NAVARRA

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Ayuda para los costes de las medidas de control obligatorias que deben aplicar los operadores de producción ecológica en Navarra durante el período 2023-2027 — renovación del régimen SA.44490

Legal basis

Resolución del Director General de Agricultura y Ganadería por la que se aprueban las bases reguladoras de la ayuda a los costes de las medidas de control obligatorias a realizar por los operadores de la producción ecológica de la Comunidad Foral de Navarra, para el periodo 2023-2027.

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Aid for organic farming

Form of aid

Subsidised services

Budget

Overall budget: 1 200 000 EUR

Intensity

100,0  %

Duration

Until 31.12.2027

Economic sectors

Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Gobierno de Navarra-Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente

C/González Tablas, 9 — 4a planta 31005 PAMPLONA (Navarra)

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-1051V

UNPUBLISHED

BARBARA TURNER, as Personal 

Representative of the ESTATE OF 

HARRY TURNER,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: August 26, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for 

petitioner.

Mark Kim Hellie, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On July 22, 2019, Barbara Turner, as Personal Representative of the Estate of 

Harry Turner, filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury 

Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner 

alleges that Harry Turner suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of his 

influneza (“flu”) vaccination on October 11, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to 

the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

On August 24, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, Respondent indicates that

[m]edical personnel at the Division of Injury Compensation Programs, 

Department of Health and Human Services (“DICP”), have reviewed the 

petition and medical records filed in the case. It is respondent’s position that 

petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table 

(“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (“QAI”). 42 C.F.R. 

§§ 100.3(a)(XIV)(D), 100.3(c)(15).

Id. at 3. 

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 4412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1410]

[[Page 4412]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee--Closed 
Session

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee 
Special Closed Session.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App. 2), and Title 41 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations, section 102-3.160, notice is hereby given of a 
special closed session of the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory 
Committee (COMSTAC). The special closed session will be an 
administrative session for the Committee members to review the 
structure of COMSTAC's public meetings and discuss if the current 
structure is the most desirable arrangement of activities. The meeting 
will take place on Thursday, February 10, 2010, at the Washington 
Convention Center, 801 Mount Vernon Place NW., Washington, DC 20001, 
from 8 a.m. until 8:45 a.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Lender (AST-100), Office of 
Commercial Space Transportation (AST), 800 Independence Avenue SW., 
Room 325, Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-8029, e-mail 
susan.lender@faa.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC, January 18, 2011.
George C. Nield,
Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2011-1410 Filed 1-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```