alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-12-00065-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

MARCH 27, 2012

IN THE INTEREST OF C.B., A CHILD

 FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 78,825-E; HONORABLE DOUGLAS WOODBURN, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

**ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND**

	In this accelerated appeal, appellant B.W., appeals an order terminating her parental rights to her minor child C.B.  Her court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw from representation supported by an *Anders*[footnoteRef:1] brief.  By her brief counsel certifies that in her professional opinion the case presents “no arguable points of error.”  Based on our review of the record filed by appellant, we find an arguable appellate issue exists as to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the trial court’s finding that B.W. violated Family Code § 161.001(1)(O).  Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.001(1)(O) (West Supp. 2011).  The arguable issue includes, but is not necessarily limited to, whether legally and factually sufficient evidence established that C.B. was removed from B.W. under Chapter 262 of the Family Code for the abuse or neglect of C.B.  [1:  Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).  This court has held that appointed counsel may file an Anders brief in an appeal from an order terminating parental rights.  See In re A.W.T., 61 S.W.3d 87, 88 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 2001, no pet.).] 

	We therefore grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.  The case is abated and remanded to the trial court for the appointment of new counsel.  Newly-appointed counsel shall prepare and file an appellant’s brief developing the arguable issue we have identified as well as any other ground that might support reversal or modification of the judgment.  Newly-appointed counsel shall not limit review to the record now on file with this court but may request supplementation to any extent deemed necessary.  

	The trial court shall notify this court in writing of the name, address, telephone number, fax number, and state bar number of B.W.’s newly-appointed counsel within ten days of the date of this order.  Newly-appointed counsel shall file the appellate brief for B.W. within twenty days of the date of appointment by the trial court.

	It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

2

2
# C_2023284EN.01000701.xml

| 11.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/7

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107613

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 284/06)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 28.7.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107613 |
| Member State | Finland |
| Region | MANNER-SUOMI |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aid to the central and regional trotting tracks in Finland |
| Legal basis | — | Act on Discretionary Government Transfers, 688/2001; — Act on grants to advance horse breeding and equestrian sports, 331/2023. |

Date of adoption of the decision

28.7.2023

Aid number

SA.107613

Member State

Finland

Region

MANNER-SUOMI

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aid to the central and regional trotting tracks in Finland

Legal basis

—

Act on Discretionary Government Transfers, 688/2001; — Act on grants to advance horse breeding and equestrian sports, 331/2023.

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Sport and multifunctional recreational infrastructures

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 175 000 000 EUR

Annual budget: 35 000 000 EUR

Intensity

100,0  %

Duration

1.1.2024 — 31.12.2028

Economic sectors

Raising of horses and other equines, Sports activities

Name and address of the granting authority

| Maa- ja metsätalousministeriö |
| --- |
| PL 30, 00023 Valtioneuvosto |

Maa- ja metsätalousministeriö

PL 30, 00023 Valtioneuvosto

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA

---
Exhibit 4.1

NUMBER                                                                   SHARES

              Incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware

                                SAMDREW II, INC.

                    Total Authorized Issue 50,000,000 Shares

40,000,000 Shares Par Value                        10,000,000 Shares Par Value
$.0001 each Common Stock                           $.0001 each Preferred Stock

                                                                 See Reverse for
                                                             Certain Definitions
                                    Specimen

This is to certify that ____________________is the owner of

___      Fully Paid and Non-Assessable Shares of Common Stock of  Samdrew II,
Inc.

transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder thereof in
person or by a duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate
properly endorsed.

Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized
officers.

Dated:

---------------------------                       ------------------------------
Secretary                                         President
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!--XBRL Document Created with Wdesk from Workiva-->
<!--Copyright 2022 Workiva-->
<!--r:4d26f477-87f7-4b9a-b902-4437b9b3021a,g:3350ceb7-9b87-4db6-ae6c-821b793c2aba-->
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:link="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" xmlns:frme="http://www.firstmerchants.com/20220510" xmlns:xbrli="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" xmlns:dtr-types="http://www.xbrl.org/dtr/type/2020-01-21" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://www.firstmerchants.com/20220510">
  <xs:import namespace="http://fasb.org/us-gaap/2021-01-31" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.fasb.org/us-gaap/2021/elts/us-gaap-2021-01-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xlink-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-linkbase-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/dtr/type/2020-01-21" schemaLocation="https://www.xbrl.org/dtr/type/2020-01-21/types.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2021q4" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2021q4/dei-2021q4.xsd"/>
  <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="frme-20220510_lab.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/labelLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="frme-20220510_pre.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="frme-20220510_def.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/definitionLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:roleType id="DocumentandEntityInformationDocument" roleURI="http://www.firstmerchants.com/role/DocumentandEntityInformationDocument">
        <link:definition>0001001 - Document - Document and Entity Information Document</link:definition>
        <link:usedOn>link:presentationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:calculationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:definitionLink</link:usedOn>
      </link:roleType>
    </xs:appinfo>
  </xs:annotation>
  <xs:element id="frme_DepositarySharesMember" abstract="true" name="DepositarySharesMember" nillable="true" xbrli:periodType="duration" substitutionGroup="xbrli:item" type="dtr-types:domainItemType"/>
</xs:schema>
</XBRL>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3080 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exception to 

the employer health insurance mandate for Indian tribal governments 

and tribally owned businesses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2015 

Mrs. NOEM (for herself and Mr. ZINKE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an exception to the employer health insurance mandate 

for Indian tribal governments and tribally owned businesses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Employment 

5 and Jobs Protection Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3080 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO EMPLOYER HEALTH INSURANCE 

2 MANDATE FOR INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERN3 MENTS AND TRIBALLY OWNED BUSINESSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4980H(c)(2) of the Inter5 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 

6 end the following new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(F) EXCEPTION FOR INDIAN TRIBAL GOV8 ERNMENTS AND TRIBALLY OWNED BUSI9 NESSES.— 

10 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘applica11 ble large employer’ shall not include any 

12 tribal employer. 

13 ‘‘(ii) TRIBAL EMPLOYER.—For pur14 poses of this subparagraph, the term ‘trib15 al employer’ means— 

16 ‘‘(I) any Indian tribal govern17 ment (as defined in section 

18 7701(a)(40)) or subdivision thereof, 

19 or any agency or instrumentality of ei20 ther, 

21 ‘‘(II) any tribal organization (as 

22 defined in section 4(l) of the Indian 

23 Self-Determination and Education As24 sistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b(l))), 

25 ‘‘(III) any corporation if more 

26 than 50 percent (determined by vote 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3080 IH

1 and value) of the outstanding stock of 

2 such corporation is owned, directly or 

3 indirectly, by any entity described in 

4 subclause (I) or (II), and 

5 ‘‘(IV) any partnership if more 

6 than 50 percent of the value of the 

7 capital and profits interests are 

8 owned, directly or indirectly, by any 

9 entity described in subclause (I) or 

10 (II).’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 this section shall apply to months beginning after Decem13 ber 31, 2014. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of Nature Vision, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities listed below,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (i)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

|                        |                                                                       |                         |  |  | 
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- |  |  | 
|Dated:   April 14, 2005 |                                                                       | /s/   Jeffrey P. Zernov
|                        |                                                                      
|                        | Jeffrey P. ZernovChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer) |                        
|                       
|                       
|Dated:   April 14, 2005 |                                                                       | /s/   Michael R. Day   
|                        |                                                                      
|                        | Michael R. DayChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)    |                        

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Nature Vision, Inc. and will be retained by Nature Vision, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1697

CHARLES OWUSU ANI,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: November 26, 2013 Decided: December 19, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Goren, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID GOREN, Silver Spring, Maryland, 

for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, 

Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, James E. Grimes, Office of 

Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Owusu Ani, a native and citizen of Ghana, 

petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals’ (“Board”) order affirming the immigration judge’s 

denial of his request to continue his removal proceedings. Ani 

sought a continuance to allow his wife, who is an American 

citizen, to administratively appeal USCIS’s* order revoking its 

prior approval of the I-130 visa petition she had filed for 

Ani’s benefit. The Attorney General argues that this petition 

for review has been rendered moot by the Board’s subsequent 

affirmance of USCIS’s decision. We agree. 

Whether the court is “presented with a live case or 

controversy” is an issue that “goes to the heart of the Article 

III jurisdiction of the courts.” Friedman’s, Inc. v. Dunlap, 

290 F.3d 191, 197 (4th Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks 

omitted). To qualify for adjudication in federal court, “an 

actual controversy must be extant at all stages of review, not 

merely at the time the complaint is filed.” Arizonans for 

Official English v. Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 67 (1997) (internal 

quotation marks omitted). “[I]f an event occurs while a case is 

pending on appeal that makes it impossible for the court to 

grant ‘any effectual relief whatever’ to a prevailing party, the 

 * United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.
3

appeal must be dismissed.” Church of Scientology of Cal. v. 

United States, 506 U.S. 9, 12 (1992) (quoting Mills v. Green, 

159 U.S. 651, 653 (1895)). 

The sole issue in this petition for review is Ani’s 

challenge to the Board’s decision affirming the immigration 

judge’s denial of his request for a continuance. Even if we 

were to accept Ani’s arguments and remand the case, Ani’s basis 

for seeking a continuance is no longer viable. Therefore, we 

cannot render a decision that would affect Ani’s legal rights. 

See Qureshi v. Gonzales, 442 F.3d 985, 988-89 (7th Cir. 2006). 

We accordingly dismiss this petition for review as 

moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DISMISSED
##### 



RemedyTemp, Inc.
 Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 August 9, 2005
    
    
    
    /s/ GREG D. PALMERGreg D. PalmerPresident and Chief Executive OfficerRemedyTemp, Inc.August 9, 2005
    
    
    
    /s/ MONTY A. HOUDESHELLMonty A. HoudeshellSenior Vice President, Chief
Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary(Principal Financial Officer)RemedyTemp, Inc.
# C_2022478EN.01001901.xml

| 16.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 478/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 478/19

---

Information from the Commission pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2022/1663

(2022/C 478/06)

Pursuant to Article 3 of Council Decision (EU) 2022/1663 of 26 September 2022 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union on the amendments to the Annexes to the Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR) and to the Regulations annexed to the European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Inland Waterways (ADN) (1), the Commission informs that the decisions taken at the respective bodies and applicable from 1 January 2023 are available at:

https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CN/2022/CN.350.2022-Eng.pdf and

https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CN/2022/CN.325.2022-Eng.pdf

---

(1)  OJ L 250, 28.9.2022, p. 19.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR BILLING CONCEPTS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          76,560
<SECURITIES>                                         4
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,008
<ALLOWANCES>                                       251
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               225,568
<PP&E>                                          29,377 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,028
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 252,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          172,950
<BONDS>                                          2,403
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           342
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   252,884
<SALES>                                          4,223
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,028
<CGS>                                            3,213
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   108
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 164
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,480
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,044 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,436 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,436  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39 
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023095EN.01000201.xml

| 14.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11011 – EQT / TRESCAL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 95/02)

On 6 March 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11011. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11011. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT




 

 

Exhibit 10(a)

STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

ENERGEN CORPORATION 1997 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

[Incentive Stock Option / Nonqualified Stock Option] 

Dated as of ____________,_____


A stock option is hereby granted to the below named Participant.  This option is granted under the Energen Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan ("the Plan"), dated November 25, 1997, as amended, and is subject in all respects to the terms and provisions of the Plan which is incorporated herein by reference.  Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, this option is subject to the exercise and transferability restrictions set forth in the Plan.  Words defined in the Plan and used in this Agreement shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan.  The attributes of this option are as follows:



	Incentive Stock Option:  This option is a[n] [ Incentive Stock Option / Nonqualified Stock Option ].


2)Participant:Name


3)Shares subject to option:Shares4)Date of Grant:___________


5)Exercise Price per share:$_____              6)Expiration Date: ___________

7)Vesting:  The option shall become exercisable on [ 100% on a specified date / in increments on specified dates ].   Any exercisable portion of the option may be exercised in full or, from time to time, in increments of at least 100 shares.




8)SARs:This option [ does / does not ] include stock appreciation rights (see Plan Section 6.2(i)), [but such stock 

appreciation rights are payable only in shares of stock, they are not payable in cash].


9)DEs:This option [does / does not ] include dividend equivalents (see Plan Section 6.3(j) of the Plan) [, but such dividend equivalents will be payable only if and to the extent that the option is exercised].


10)Additional terms and conditions:[ None /  specified additional terms and conditions ].


 

ENERGEN CORPORATIONThe Participant hereby accepts this option and

agrees to accept as binding, conclusive, and

and final all decisions and interpretations of 

the Committee and/or the Board, upon any

questions arising under the Plan.

By:                                                                                



Its:________________________________________


                                                                                      

Participant - Name