alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 280 

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to recoup bonuses and awards 

paid to employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2015 

Mr. MILLER of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to recoup 

bonuses and awards paid to employees of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO RECOUP BONUSES OR AWARDS 

4 PAID TO EMPLOYEES OF DEPARTMENT OF 

5 VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 7 of title 38, United 

7 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new section: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 280 IH

1 ‘‘§ 715. Recoupment of bonuses or awards paid to em2 ployees of Department 

3 ‘‘(a) RECOUPMENT.—Notwithstanding any other pro4 vision of law, the Secretary may issue an order directing 

5 an employee of the Department to repay the amount, or 

6 a portion of the amount, of any award or bonus paid to 

7 the employee under title 5, including under chapters 45 

8 or 53 of such title, or this title if— 

9 ‘‘(1) the Secretary determines such repayment 

10 appropriate pursuant to regulations prescribed by 

11 the Secretary to carry out this section; and 

12 ‘‘(2) before a repayment, the employee is af13 forded notice and an opportunity for a hearing con14 ducted by the Secretary. 

15 ‘‘(b) REVIEW.—The decision of the Secretary regard16 ing a repayment by an employee pursuant to subsection 

17 (a) is final and may not be reviewed by any other agency 

18 or any court.’’. 

19 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

20 at the beginning of such chapter is further amended by 

21 adding at the end the following new item: 

‘‘715. Recoupment of bonuses or awards paid to employees of Department.’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 715 of title 38, 

23 United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall 

24 apply with respect to an award or bonus paid by the Sec25 retary of Veterans Affairs to an employee of the DepartVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:34 Jan 20, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H280.IH H280

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 280 IH

1 ment of Veterans Affairs before, on, or after the date of 

2 the enactment of this Act. 

3 (d) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act or the 

4 amendments made by this Act may be construed to modify 

5 the certification issued by the Office of Personnel Manage6 ment and the Office of Management and Budget regarding 

7 the performance appraisal system of the Senior Executive 

8 Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2022427EN.01000301.xml

| 9.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/3

---

CLEAN AVIATION JOINT UNDERTAKING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2021

(2022/C 427/03)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://clean-aviation.eu/sites/default/files/2022-06/Final-Accounts-2021.pdf

---
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of BarPoint.com, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey S. Benjamin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| Dated: May 14, 2003 |                                            |   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                |                                            |   |
|                | /s/ JEFFREY S. BENJAMIN                         |   |
|                |                                                 |   |
|                | **Jeffrey S. Benjamin Chief Financial Officer** |   |
Exhibit 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-40370, 333-116362, 333-138411 and 333-157804 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-161492 on Form S-3, of our reports dated March 1, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Tutor Perini Corporation, and the effectiveness of Tutor Perini Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tutor Perini Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009.











/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP







Los Angeles, California


August 5, 2010
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2060
ORISHA KAMMEFA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-6-B) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Orisha Kammefa, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Arne Nielsen, Assistant Attorney General, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her civil complaint filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1981 & Supp. 1995), alleging discrimination based on race, gender, and religion, and retaliation. Appellant also appeals from the court's order denying her motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P.59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kammefa v. Maryland Dep't of Agric. , No. CA-94-6-B (D. Md. Feb. 24, 1995; Apr. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 01-4810

DANNY ALLISON BATTLE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.

Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge.

(CR-01-30-BO)

Submitted: June 20, 2002

Decided: June 28, 2002

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellant. J. Frank Bradsher, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Danny Allison Battle pled guilty to one count of being a felon in

possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(1) (West

2000). He was sentenced to 96 months imprisonment, followed by

three years of supervised release. Battle noted a timely appeal and his

counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967), addressing whether the district court adequately ascertained that Battle had read and discussed with his attorney the presentence report prior to sentencing, as required by Fed. R. Crim. P.

32(c)(3)(A), but stating that in his opinion there are no meritorious

issues for appeal. Although notified of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, Battle has not done so. For the reasons that follow, we

affirm. 

Before imposing sentence, a district court must verify that the

defendant and defendant’s counsel have read and discussed the presentence report. United States v. Miller, 849 F.2d 896, 897 (4th Cir.

1988). A district court is not always required to expressly ask whether

the report has been read and discussed; instead, a statement by counsel or the defendant may demonstrate that the report has been read

and discussed by them. United States v. McManus, 23 F.3d 878, 884-

85 (4th Cir. 1994). We find that the record establishes that Battle had

read the presentence report and had discussed it with his attorney

prior to sentencing. Accordingly, we conclude that the district court

complied with Rule 32(c)(A)(3). 

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire record and

find no reversible error. We therefore affirm the judgment. This court

requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the

client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such

a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for

2 UNITED STATES v. BATTLE
leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state

that a copy thereof was served on the client. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

UNITED STATES v. BATTLE 3
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3018 

To provide for a safe harbor period for the transition from the ICD–9 

to the ICD–10 standard for health care claims. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2015 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself and Mr. PRICE of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for a safe harbor period for the transition from 

the ICD–9 to the ICD–10 standard for health care claims. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coding Flexibility in 

5 Healthcare Act of 2015’’ or the ‘‘Code-FLEX Act of 

6 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3018 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONTINUING USE OF ICD–9–CM CODES DURING A 

2 TRANSITION PERIOD. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and 

4 Human Services, in implementing the transition to ICD– 

5 10 code sets pursuant to section 1173(c) of the Social Se6 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1320d–2(c)) and consistent with 

7 section 212 of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 

8 2014, shall provide for a transition period, in accordance 

9 with subsection (b), during which health care claims (and 

10 related standard transactions) otherwise payable (or proc11 essed) by public and private payors shall continue to be 

12 processed and paid, as applicable, if submitted with ICD– 

13 9 codes. 

14 (b) DURATION OF TRANSITION PERIOD.—The transi15 tion period under subsection (a) shall begin on the first 

16 day in which the Secretary adopts such ICD–10 code sets 

17 as the standard for codes sets under section 1173(c) of 

18 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320d–2(c)) and end 

19 180 days after such date. 

20 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

21 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 

22 to Congress a report assessing the impact of such ICD– 

23 10 code sets on health care providers participating under 

24 the Medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Se25 curity Act, individuals entitled to benefits under part A 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3018 IH

1 of such title or enrolled under part B of such title, and 

2 other impacted stakeholders. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2954 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2954

   To designate the Federal building located at 617 Walnut Street in 
   Helena, Arkansas, as the ``Jacob Trieber Federal Building, United 
          States Post Office, and United States Court House''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 7, 2015

  Mr. Crawford (for himself, Mr. Westerman, Mr. Womack, and Mr. Hill) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the Federal building located at 617 Walnut Street in 
   Helena, Arkansas, as the ``Jacob Trieber Federal Building, United 
          States Post Office, and United States Court House''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JACOB TRIEBER FEDERAL BUILDING, UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, 
              AND UNITED STATES COURT HOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building located at 617 Walnut Street 
in Helena, Arkansas, shall be known and designated as the ``Jacob 
Trieber Federal Building, United States Post Office, and United States 
Court House''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Jacob Trieber Federal Building, United States Post Office, and United 
States Court House''.
                                 <all>
```
#### ZEPEDA v. STATE.

No. 19559.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 3, 1938.

Oliver W. Johnson, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Conviction for violating the local option law; punishment, a fine of $100.

The record is here without a statement of facts or bills of exception. All matters of procedure appear regular.

The judgment will be affirmed.
RevisionofALLEGHENYCOUNTY’SportionofthePENNSYLVANIASTATEIMPLEMENTATIONPLANfortheAttainmentandMaintenanceoftheNationalAmbientAirQualityStandards2.Revision55ChangestoAlleghenyCountyHealthDepartmentRulesandRegulationsArticleXXI,AirPollutionControl§2102.06.g,RequirementsforModelingAdditiotisareshowninlargerboldfontandunderlined.§2102.06MAJORSOURCESLOCATINGINORIMPACTINGANONATTAINMENTAREA{Paragraphb.2&Subparagraphsb.4.C&DamendedandParagrapha.4&SubsectionfaddedSeptember6,1995,effectiveOctober20,1995;SubsectiongaddedbyJune13,2005amendment,effectiveJuly10,2005.{a.Applicabilityb.ConditionsforApprovalc.TemporarySourcesd.FuelSwitchese.AnalysisofAlternativesf.EconomicDevelopmentZonesg.RequirementsforModeling.WhereairqualitymodelsareusedtomeettheurovisionsofthisSection.modeIinshallbebasedontheauylicablemodelsandotherrequirementsspecifiedin40CFRPart51AnpendixW(GuidelineonAirqualityModels.WhereanairuualitymodelspecifiedintheGuidelineonAirOualityModelsisinaunronriate.themodelmaybemodifiedoranothermodelmaybesubstitutedonlyonacase-by-casebasisattheDenartment’sdiscretionuponwrittenanprovalbytheAdministratorofEPA.Inaddition,useofamodifiedorsubstitutedmodelmustbesubiecttonoticeandonnortunityforpubliccommentunderuroceduressetforthin40CFR51.102.TechnicalSupportDocumentforRevision5540CFRPart51,SubpartI,‘ReviewofNewSourcesandModifications,”addressestheneedforstateimplementationplanstoincludeproceduresthatdiscussthedispersionorotherairqualitymodelingusedtomeettherequirementsofthesubpart.Specifically,therequirementsarethatallapplicationsofairqualitymodelingshallbebasedonapplicablemodelsandotherrequirementsspecifiedin40CFR51AppendixW(GuidelineonAirQualityModels),oramodifiedAppendixWorsubstitutethereof,thathasbeenapprovedbytheEPAAdministrator.ToaccomplishthisSIPrequirement,ArticleXXI§2102.06,“MajorSourcesLocatinginorImpactingaNonattainmentArea,”isbeingrevisedheretoincorporatetherequirementsof40CFR51.160.finanewSubsection2102.06g.‘RequirementsofModeling.”RevisionofALLEGHENYCOUNTY’SportionofthePENNSYLVANIASTATEIMPLEMENTATIONPLANfortheAttainmentandMaintenanceoftheNationalAmbientAirQualityStandardsRevisions43&55DocumentationofPublicHearingandCertificationsPublichearingnoticeTransmittalsofhearingnoticetoEPA&PADEPProofofpublicationofnoticeofhearingCertificationofhearingSummaryofCommentsandresponsesCertificationofapprovalandadoption
#### ATOR v. STATE.

No. 15544.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 19, 1932.

J. T. Ranspot, of Mineral Wells, for appellant.

*471Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for theft of cattle, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

We find no statement of facts or hills of exception in the record. The indictment appears regular on its face. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is .affirmed.
# L_2008288EN.01S00301.xml

| 30.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 288/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 288/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
Exhibit 3.5

                     CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                OF

                   CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                OF

                    PARKER-LEVITT CORPORATION


          PARKER-LEVITT CORPORATION (the "Corporation"), a corporation
organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

          FIRST:  That the Board of Directors of the Corporation at a meeting
duly held, adopted resolutions proposing and declaring advisable the following
amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation of said Corporation:

          RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of this
          corporation be amended by amending the Article thereof numbered
          "FIRST" so that, as amended said Article shall be and read as
          follows:

          "The name of the corporation is Commercial Property Corp."

          SECOND: That said amendments have been approved and authorized by
the vote of in excess of a majority of the holders of all the issued and
outstanding stock of the Corporation entitled to vote at the annual meeting of
stockholders of said Corporation.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said PARKER-LEVITT CORPORATION has caused its
corporate seal to be hereunto affixed and this certificate to be signed by
Cosmo J. Caterino, its President, and Robert J. Patten, its Secretary, this
24th day of August 1976.

                         PARKER-LEVITT CORPORATION


                             By/s/Cosmo J. Caterino
                              President


                              /s/Robert J. Patten
                   ATTEST:    Secretary


STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS)
                      )  SS.:
COUNTY OF WORCHESTER  )

     BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this 24th day of August, 1976, personally
came before me a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid,
Cosmo J. Caterino, President, and Robert J. Patten, Secretary of Parker-Levitt
Corporation, a corporation of the State of Delaware, the corporation described
in and which executed the foregoing certificate, known to me personally to be
such, and they, the said Cosmo J. Caterino as such President and Robert J.
Patten as such Secretary duly executed said certificate before me and
acknowledged the said certificate to be their act and deed and the act and
deed of said Corporation; that the signatures of said President and of the
Secretary of said corporation to said foregoing certificate are in the
handwriting of the said President and Secretary of said Corporation
respectively; that the seal affixed to said certificate is the common or
corporate seal of said Corporation; that the facts stated in the foregoing
certificate are true; and that the act of sealing, executing, acknowledging
and delivering said certificate was duly authorized by the Board of Directors
and Stockholders of said Corporation.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal of office the
day and year aforesaid.

                              /s/Shirley J. Fedreline
# C_2023062EN.01000101.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10935 – DNB / DANSKE BANK / SB1 / EIKA / BALDER / VIPPS / MOBILEPAY)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 62/01)

On 21 October 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10935. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10935. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
CHINA FINANCE, INC.
57-71 #HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIAL PARK NANSHAN,
DISTRICT SHENZHEN, P.R. CHINA 51805

October 11th 2004

RE: Resignation of XIAOBIN LIU

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders:

      I hereby resign the position as the CFO of China Finance, Inc. (the
"Company") effective immediately. Please be advised that my resignation from the
Company is not a result of any disagreements with the Company on any matters
relating to the Company's operations, policies, or practices. Please also be
advised that I have no claim against the Company for compensation for loss of
office, fees or disbursements or otherwise whatsoever.


                                     Very truly yours,


                                     -------------------------------------------
                                           XIAOBIN LI