alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements contained in the Form 10-Q for the nine months ended
September 30, 1999 for Aetna Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            30,709
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                         842
<MORTGAGE>                                       3,535
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      315
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  38,251
<CASH>                                           2,125
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               3,979
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           2,078
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,463
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 18,820
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                287
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   4,861
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           16,221
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  4,294
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,095
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,211
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,463
<PREMIUMS>                                      14,598
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              2,233
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  61
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   1,782
<BENEFITS>                                      13,630
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        154
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,013
<INCOME-TAX>                                       441
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                572
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       572
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.74
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texa s at Fort Wort h

______ _____________________ No. 02

- 20

- 00363

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 43rd Di strict Court P arker Co unty, Texas Trial Court No. CV11

- 1167
Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr, J. Per Curiam Memorandum O pinion 

### C AROL 

### P OOL 

### , Appellant

V


### . J AMES 

### P OOL 

### , Appellee2 MEMOR ANDUM OPINION
Based on pro se Appellant Carol P ool ’ s purported notice of restricted appeal, which complain s of orders in two trial court causes, this court dockete d two separate appeals : (1) appellate c ause n umber 02

- 20

- 00362

- CV 1 for Caro l ’ s chall eng e s to orders
in trial court cause number 18

- 765 and ( 2) this appeal for her challenge to the trial

court ’ s May 14, 2020 “ Or de r Grant ing [ James Pool ’ s ] Mot ion to Compel Discovery ”
in t rial c ourt c ause n umber CV11

- 1167

. Because we were c oncer ned that we lack jurisdiction over the interlocutory appeal of a disc overy order , we n otified Carol that the discovery order does not appear to be a final judgment or an a ppe alable interl ocutory order. We informed he r that unless she or anot her party furnished this court with a response showing grounds for continuing t he ap peal, we could dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See
Tex. R . App. 42.3(a), 4 3.2(f).
Ca rol ’ s response indicates t hat she “ never intended to perfect two separate appeals under two different trial court case numbers ” and that we “ should set aside [this appeal ] as void ab initio and [a] nullity rather than toll dismissals

. ” Be cause we lack jurisdi ction over th is appeal, w e dismiss it.
This cou rt has appellate jurisdiction only of appeals from final judgments an d
from interlocu tory orders that the Texas Legislature has spe cified are immediately

1 A ppellate c ause n umber 02

- 20

- 00362

- CV remains pending

. Pool v. Pool , No. 02

- 20

- 00362

- CV (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth file d Nov. 13, 2020 )

.3 appealable. Lehman n v. Har

– Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 19 5 (Tex. 2001); s ee, e.g. , Te x. Civ. Prac. & Rem . Code Ann. § 51.014. An order granting a motion to compel discovery is a n interlocut ory order that is not appealable until after a final judgment

. Clifton v. Burroughs , No

. 2

- 08

- 404

- CV, 2008 WL 5401489, at *2 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Dec. 23, 2008, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.); see also Edwards v. Panda Express Inc. , No. 05

- 19

- 00715

- CV, 2019 WL 402 7082, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Aug. 27, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.)

. T he tr ial court has not yet signed a final judg men t in thi s matter
. The challenged int erlocutory order compelling discovery is therefore not yet appealable. Consequently, we dismi ss this ap peal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam
Delivered: February 4, 2021
#### Vollmer, a Taxpayer, Appellant, *v.*Village of Amherst et al., Appellees. *

(No. 28309

Decided December 17, 1941.)

*Mr. G. A. Resek, Messrs. Welles, Kelsey, Cobourn & Harrington*and *Messrs. Hartshorn, Thomas, Abele, Phillips (£ Mitchell,*for appellant.

*140
      *Mr. J. J. 8my the,*city solicitor, and *Mr. Milton Friedman,*for appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Bettman, J., not participating.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Channell Commercial
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas Liguori, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report complies fully with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Thomas Liguori
----------------------------------
Thomas Liguori
Chief Financial Officer
August 5, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
LIQUIDATING TRUST'S STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION AT DECEMBER 31,1997
AND TEH LIQUIDATING TRUST'S STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             399
<SECURITIES>                                   263,186
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 263,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,960
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     212,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   263,585
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,717
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,704)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,704)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)


</TABLE>
#### SIGMUND EISNER CO. v. SOL FRANK CO.

No. 9293.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

March 21, 1934.

Rehearing Denied April 25, 1934.

Emmett B. Cocke, .of San Antonio, for plaintiff in error.

Terrell, Davis, Hall. & Clemens and A. Y. Knight, all of San Antonio, for defendant id error.

PLY, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted by plaintiff in error, Sigmund Eisner Company, against defendant in error, to recover the sum of $409.-50, as evidenced by an itemized sworn account for merchandise delivered to defendant in error. The merchandise consisted of ninety-one coats and ninety-one breeches delivered to defendant in error. The verified account was denied under oath by defendant in error, hereinafter called defendant, and a cross-action was instituted by defendant against plaintiff in error, called herein plaintiff, to recover the sum'of $977.13, alleged to •be due as damages for the failure to properly manufacture certain khaki cloth sent to plaintiff by defendant, whereby the cloth was rendered useless and defendant lost a certain contract made by it with the United States government of which plaintiff had notice, whereby defendant was damaged in the sum of $977.13. '

The cause was tried without a jury, and judgment rendered against plaintiff on its claim, and judgment rendered in favor of defendant as against plaintiff on the cross-action in the sum of $450.

The seven assignments of error presented by plaintiff are based on the existence of certain testimony alleged to have been given before the trial court, and, there being no statement of facts, it is apparent that this court has no basis for passing on such assignments.

They are overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.
Edwa rd Thomas Zakarian, Private Pilot

– Section 333 Amendment Petition

To: U.S. Department of Transportation

, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Rm. W 12

- 140

12 00 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Fr: Edward T homas Zakarian , 3169 Santa Margarita Road, West palm Beach, Florida

33411

Date: July 28 , 2015



### Regar **ding:** Request to amend and allow for an additional aircraft on exemption #11739, docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0893 and to amend al titude to
include “at or below 4 00 feet Above Ground Level” (AGL).

Dear Sir or Madam :

On June 5, 2015, I was granted exemption under S ection 333 of the “FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012” (the “Reform Act”), number 11739 for the purpose of aerial data collection. I respectfully request to amend my exemption to allow for an additional sUAS, the DJI Phantom 3, to be operated in ful l compliance with the conditions as set forth within subject exemption.

Exemption No. 11739 allowed for operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision + UAS, the DJI Phantom 3 I am requesting to operate possesses the same operating specifications and weight criteri a, but with the addition of technology upgrades to its electronics making this an even safer aircraft to operate. The Phantom 3 will be operated in full compliance within the same terms and conditions contained under Exemption 11739 and within the safety guidelines specified in the manufacturers operating manual. I have attached Phantom 3 manual in the docket for your reference.

I also request subject exemption be amended from the current “at or below 200 feet
AGL” limitation to “at or below 400 feet AGL” . This altitude limitation has been granted in similar exemptions such as Exemption No. 12157. Authorization to operate at or below 400 feet AGL shall be conducted in accordance to all FAA airspace and safety guidelines and would allow my services to be competitive to other Aerial Data Collection companies permitted to operate at the higher altitude.

As there is no change in the conditions of Exemption 11739 , other than those specified above, the exemption awarded continues to benefit the public interest and safety, I request my petition to amend subject exemption be granted. Further, should the examiner determine not to approve either of my two proposed amendments, I ask they be considered individually so as not to negatively effect one another.

Sincerely,

Edward Thomas Zakarian
# C_2023131EN.01000401.xml

| 14.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/4

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.106260

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 131/03)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 23.3.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.106260 |
| Member State | Finland |
| Region | Finland |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCF measures to support final customers of electricity |
| Legal basis | Retroactive electricity compensation and due date extension for electricity bills |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant, Guarantee |
| Budget | Overall budget: 1 000 000 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 1 000 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.7.2023 |
| Economic sectors | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Valtiokonttori |
| Sörnäisten rantatie 13, Helsinki PL 14, 00054 VALTIOKONTTORI |

Date of adoption of the decision

23.3.2023

Aid number

SA.106260

Member State

Finland

Region

Finland

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCF measures to support final customers of electricity

Legal basis

Retroactive electricity compensation and due date extension for electricity bills

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant, Guarantee

Budget

Overall budget: 1 000 000 000 EUR

Annual budget: 1 000 000 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.7.2023

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Valtiokonttori

Sörnäisten rantatie 13, Helsinki PL 14, 00054 VALTIOKONTTORI

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
# C_2022427EN.01002801.xml

| 9.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/28

---

EUROPEAN MARITIME SAFETY AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2021

(2022/C 427/28)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.emsa.europa.eu/financial-management/financial-documents/26-financial-statements.html

---
ICRAS 1403 1845

- 0022 v 10

– Affected Public

– State, L ocal or Tribal Governments 4 / 29 /201 4

The Department of Education (the Department) proposes to amend the Student Assistance General Provisions regulations issued under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), to implement the changes made by the Violence Against Women Reauthorizatio n Act of 2013 (VAWA) (Pub. L. 113

- 4), which, among other provisions, amended section 485(f) of the HEA, otherwise known as the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Securit y Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act (Clery Act). These proposed regulations are a result of negotiated rulemaking and would update and clarify the current regulations. This is a revision to the current collection due to changed regulatory action that requires additional collection and reporting b y the institutions. Burden that is impacted is in proposed §668.46 (b), §668.46(c) §668.46(j), and §668.46(k). The Department is requesting continued approval of the current collection along with consideration of the following revisions. 34 CFR §668.46 Institutional securit y policies and crimes statistics. Under proposed §668.46(b) Annual security report , we have revised and expanded existing language and added new requirements for items to be reported annually

. Under proposed §668.46(c), Crime statistics, we have revised and expanded e xisting language and added new reporting requirements for items to be reported in the annual survey

. Under proposed §668.46(j), Programs to prevent dating violence, domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking , we are proposing particular elements of the required description of the institution’s programs and ongoing campaigns about prevention and awareness that must be included in the institution’s annual security report. Under proposed §668.46(k), Procedures for institutional disciplinary action in c ases of alleged dating violence, domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking , we would implement the statutory changes requiring an institution that participates in any title IV, HEA program, other than a foreign institution, to include a statement of p olicy in its annual security

report addressing the procedures for institutional disciplinary action in cases of alleged dating violence, domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking.
**§668.46 New Burden:** Respondents Responses Hours/Response Ho urs of Burden **Public Institutions** 2,011 **§** 668.46 (b) Annual Security Report x 2.5 = 5,028 **§** 668.46 (c) Crime Statistics x 1.5 = 3,017 **§** 668.46 (j) Programs/Training x 4 = 8,044 **§** 668.46 (k) Procedures/Discipline x 2.75 = 5,530
**Total 21,619**
Exhibit 32
                                   ----------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commodore Applied Technologies,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
we,  Shelby T.  Brewer  and James M.  DeAngelis,  Chairman  and Chief  Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, respectively, of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
              and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material   respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
              operations of the Company.


November 14, 2003


/s/ Shelby T. Brewer
--------------------
Shelby T. Brewer
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



/s/James M. DeAngelis
---------------------
James M. DeAngelis
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001027574
<NAME> Outsourcing Solutions Inc
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                       538
<INVENTORY>                                     42,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,205
<PP&E>                                          44,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,699
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,683
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>