alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022166EN.01001001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 20.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/10 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10661 – Bain Capital / Inetum)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 166/08)

1.

On 8 April 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022166EN.01001001-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Bain Capital Investors, LLC (‘Bain Capital’, United States of America), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Inetum S.A. (‘Inetum’, France). |

Bain Capital will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Inetum.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Bain Capital: a private equity investment firm that invests in companies across a number of industries, including information technology, healthcare, retail and consumer products, communications, financial services and industrial/manufacturing, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Inetum: a provider of digital services and solutions to customers active in a variety of sectors. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022166EN.01001001-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10661 – Bain Capital / Inetum

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022166EN.01001001-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022166EN.01001001-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20591 and #20592; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-20011]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Florida (FEMA-4806-DR), dated August 28, 2024.

# DATES:

Issued on September 13, 2024.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         October 28, 2024.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         May 28, 2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street                               ( print page 76910)                            SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Florida, dated 08/28/2024, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Incident:*                     Hurricane Debby.                

*Incident Period:*                     August 1, 2024 through August 27, 2024.                

*Primary Counties:*                     Alachua, Clay, Duval, Franklin, Nassau, Pinellas, St. Johns, Sumter.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco Sánchez, Jr.,

Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2024-21423 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
EXHIBIT 23(i)


               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. of our report dated January 28, 1998,
included in the 1997 Annual Report to Stockholders of Penn Engineering &
Manufacturing Corp.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January
28, 1998 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Penn
Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. incorporated by reference in this Annual
report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997, in the following
registration statements:

     Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. 1996 Equity Incentive Plan
     Form S-8 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-20101); and

     Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. 1996 Employee Stock
     Purchase Plan Form S-8 Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-13073).


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


March 31, 1998


<PAGE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
-0465 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. THOMAS RALPH BRISTOW,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 27, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 20 2022

04/20/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0465
Byron Mallott Lieutenant Governor State Capitol Juneau, Alaska 99811 907.465.3520 465.5400 Fax WWW.LTGOV.ALASKA.GOV 530 West ?1h Ave, Suite 1700 Anchorage, Alaska 99501

907.269.7460 269.0263 L

T.GOVERNOR@ALASKA.GOV



### TO: FROM: DATE: RE: OFFICE OFTHE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR ALASKA



### MEMORANDUM Gary Mendivil, AAC Contact Department ofEnvironmental Conservation Scott Meriwether Special Assistant

## ~..,. ___ _ 907.465.4081 August 27, 2015 Filed Permanent Regulations: Department ofEnvironmental Conservation Regulations re: air quality permitting and emission fees (18 AAC 50.230(c)(1)(I),(d)(1)(E); 18 AAC 50.260(p); 18 AAC 50.400 - 18 AAC 50.499) Attorney General File: JU2015200033 Regulation Filed: August 27, 2015 Effective Date: September 26, 2015 Print: 215, October 2015

cc with enclosures: Linda Miller, Department ofLaw Genevieve Wojtusik, Administrative Regulation Review Committee Judy Herndon, LexisNexis
##### 



Exhibit 99  Review Report of
Independent Certified Public Accountants
TIB Financial Corp.

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of TIB Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries

We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheet of TIB Financial Corp.
and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of
income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, and changes in
the stockholders equity and cash flows for the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 included in the accompanying Securities and Exchange
Commission Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States
of America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding
the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such
an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for
them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended
(not presented herein); and in our report dated February 22, 2002, we expressed
an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our
opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2001 is fairly stated in all material respects in
relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ BDO Seidman, LLPAtlanta, Georgia
August 12, 2002

20
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130955 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

DENNIS J. HAUT, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130955 

 COA: 264244 

Arenac CC: 04-008969-CK 

STANDISH-STERLING COMMUNITY 

SCHOOL DISTRICT and CLAUDE INCH,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 23, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0724 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 31, 2006 

 Clerk
#### BLOUNT v. STATE.

No. 20916.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 13, 1940.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd • W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*1029HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with passing as true to J. K. Crane a forged instrument, same being a check for $12.50, dated April 4, 1939, drawn on the State National Bank of Big Spring, and signed by C. L. Kelsey. On conviction, punishment was assessed at three years in the penitentiary.

No bills of exception are brought forward, and the only question is the sufficiency of the evidence.

Mr. Kelsey was in the photograph business, and gave appellant employment. Kelsey was shown the check described in the indictment, and testified that he did not execute the same nor did he give appellant authority to" execute it. Mr. Crane testified that he cashed the check for appellant and saw him endorse it. Appellant did not testify, and the only witnesses introduced by him testified that he was afflicted with syphilis, but none expressed the opinion that it cause insanity. Their opinions were to the contrary.

The evidence amply supports the verdict, and the judgment is affirmed.
| (1)   | The      Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, filed with the      Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2008, fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended March      31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial      condition and results of operations of New Century Equity Holdings      Corp. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/      John P. Murray          |   | Date:  | May      15, 2008 |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------|
|   | John      P. Murray              |   |   |
|   | Principal      Financial Officer |   |   |
TO:



Exhibit 10(c)


TO:_____________________________


FROM:_____________________________


DATE:


SUBJECT:Energen Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan-Performance Share Award


Number of Performance Shares:   ________

Award Period _________________  - _____________________


 

This will confirm that the Officers Review Committee of the Energen Board of Directors has awarded to you the above-referenced number of Performance Shares under the Energen Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the "Plan").  Such action was taken by the Committee at its meeting on _________________.  The Award is subject to all of the terms and conditions of the Plan and the Performance Conditions set forth in the Plan's Administrative Guidelines, dated  ______________________.
# CI2022063EN.01000101.xml

| 7.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 63/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 63/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Decision (CFSP) 2017/1775, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/157, and in Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1770, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/156 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Mali

(2022/C 63 I/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annex II to Council Decision 2017/1775/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/157 (2), and in Annex Ia to Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1770 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/156 (4) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Mali.

The Council of the European Union has decided to include those persons on the list of persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2017/1775/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) 1770/2017 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Mali. The grounds for the listing of the persons concerned appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites referred to in Annex II to Regulation (EU) 1770/2017 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Mali, in order to obtain authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned lists should be reconsidered, before 1 October 2022, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX 1 Global and Horizontal Affairs |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX 1 Global and Horizontal Affairs

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 4 of Decision 2017/1775/CFSP and Article 12 of Regulation (EU) 1770/2017.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 251 29.9.2017, p. 23.

(2)  OJ L 25 I, 4.2.2022, p. 7.

(3)  OJ L 251 29.9.2017, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 25 I, 4.2.2022, p. 1.

---
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T HA I YA N Z HA NG , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 71453 A ge nc yN o. A 075- 123- 763 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 8, 2011 ** B efo re: F A R R IS , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. H a i Y an Z hang, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of C hi na , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng her app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on or de r i ng he rr e m ove d. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o c la im s o f du e p r o c e s s v io la tio n s .



# FI LED MA R 15 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 71453 2 Ibarra-Flores v. G on zales , 439 F . 3d 614, 620 ( 9th C i r . 2006) . W e gr antthe pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w a nd r e m and. T h e B I A m ayv io la te a n a lie n ’s du e p r o c e s s r ig h ts o n ap p e a l if it f a ils to c o n s id e rr e le v an t e v id e n c e . Se e La r i ta -M a r t i n ezv . I

NS , 2 2 0 F .3 d1 0 9 2 , 1 0 9 5 ( 9 th C i r. 20 00 ). T he re cord do es no tre fl ec tthatthe B IA or IJconsi dere d evi dence subm i tt ed by Z hang thather U . S . ci t i ze n chi l dren w ou l d suffe r har dshi p i f s he w er e r e m o v e dto C h in ab e c au s e , a s U .S . c itiz e n s , th e yw o u ldn o t b e ab le to le g a lly re si de i n C hi na w i th h erw i tho utre gu l ar l y obt ai ni ng vi sa s. M oreover, Z hang has e s t abl i s he d pr e

j udi c e be c aus e c ons i de r a t i on of thi s e vi de nc e m ayhave a f f e c t e d the o u tc o m e o f

th e p r o c e e d in g s . Se e Co lm e n a rv . I NS , 21 0 F . 3d 96 7, 97 2 (9th C i r. 20 00 ). W e there fore re m and t o al l ow the B IA t o con si der thi s e vi dence. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2986 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2986

  To amend title 28, United States Code, with respect to certain tort 
     claims arising out of the criminal misconduct of confidential 
                  informants, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2015

  Mr. Lynch introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 28, United States Code, with respect to certain tort 
     claims arising out of the criminal misconduct of confidential 
                  informants, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice for Victims of Confidential 
Informant Crime Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. TORT CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF THE CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT OF A 
              CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT.

    (a) In General.--Section 2401(b) of title 28, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``A tort claim'' and inserting ``(1) Except 
        as provided in paragraph (2)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) In the case of a claim arising out of the conduct of 
        an employee of the Government with respect to the criminal 
        misconduct of a Government informant, paragraph (1) shall be 
        applied by substituting `three years and six months' for `two 
        years'.''.
    (b) Retroactive Effect.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to any claim that--
            (1) accrued on or after May 1, 1981; and
            (2) in the case of a claim that accrued before the date of 
        enactment of this Act, is presented not later than one year 
        after that date.
    (c) Preclusion of Certain Defenses or Bars.--The Government may not 
assert a defense or a bar, based on the doctrine of res judicata or 
collateral estoppel, to a claim that--
            (1) accrued before the date of enactment of this Act; and
            (2) to which the amendments made by this section apply.
                                 <all>
```
Mr. Mark Bradford Foley

Unlimited Aerial Videos LLC

32 E Co Hwy 30A, Unit F

Santa Rosa Beach, FL 32459

February 2, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Request to Amend Section 333 Exemption No. 13153

Dear Sir/Ma’am:

By	letter	dated	October	9,	2015,	the	FAA	granted	Unlimited	Aerial	Videos	LLC	an	

exemption	to	operate	a	UAS	(DJI	Phantom	2	Vision+)	for	aerial	data	collection.		

We	would	like	to	request	that	the	approved	exemption be	amended	to	include	the	

DJI	Inspire	1	and	Turbo	Ace	Matrix.		These	platforms	are	similar	in	all	material	

respects	to	relief	provided	in	previous	requests	for	exemption,	and	will	be	operated	

in	full	compliance	of the	conditions	and	limitations	so	granted.

Very	Respectfully,

Mark	Bradford	Foley	

Unlimited	Aerial	Videos	LLC