77470 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 184 / Monday, September 23, 2024 / Proposed Rules 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) 

because it proposes to approve a State 

program; 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); and 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act. 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where the EPA or 

an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rulemaking does not 

have Tribal implications and will not 

impose substantial direct costs on Tribal 

governments or preempt Tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

Executive Order 12898 (Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629, 

February 16, 1994) directs Federal 

agencies to identify and address 

‘‘disproportionately high and adverse 

human health or environmental effects’’ 

of their actions on communities with 

environmental justice (EJ) concerns to 

the greatest extent practicable and 

permitted by law. The EPA defines EJ as 

‘‘the fair treatment and meaningful 

involvement of all people regardless of 

race, color, national origin, or income 

with respect to the development, 

implementation, and enforcement of 

environmental laws, regulations, and 

policies.’’ The EPA further defines the 

term fair treatment to mean that ‘‘no 

group of people should bear a 

disproportionate burden of 

environmental harms and risks, 

including those resulting from the 

negative environmental consequences of 

industrial, governmental, and 

commercial operations or programs and 

policies.’’ 

The State did not evaluate EJ 

considerations as part of its SIP 

submittal; the CAA and applicable 

implementing regulations neither 

prohibit nor require such an evaluation. 

The EPA did not perform an EJ analysis 

and did not consider EJ in this action. 

Consideration of EJ is not required as 

part of this action, and there is no 

information in the record inconsistent 

with the stated goal of Executive Order 

12898 of achieving EJ for communities 

with EJ concerns. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: September 16, 2024. 

Martha Guzman Aceves, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2024–21646 Filed 9–20–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Parts 1 and 64 

[WC Docket No. 24–213; MD Docket No. 

10–234; FCC 24–85; FR ID 245867] 

Improving the Effectiveness of the 

Robocall Mitigation Database; 

Amendment of CORES Registration 

System; Correction 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission published a document in 

the Federal Register of September 12, 

2024, proposing changes to procedural 

steps filers must take in the Robocall 

Mitigation Database. The document 

contained an incorrectly identified 

docket. This document corrects the 

misidentified docket, GN Docket No. 

24–213, to the correct docket, WC 

Docket No. 24–213. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erik 

Beith, Competition Policy Division, 

Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 

418–0756, or email: erik.beith@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction 

1. In the Federal Register of 

September 12, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024– 

20176, on page 74184, in the second 

column, under document headings, 

correct the identified docket to read: 

[WC Docket No. 24–213; MD Docket No. 

10–234; FCC 24–85; FR ID 240720] 

2. In the third column, in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section, in 

the first sentence, correct ‘‘GN Docket 

No. 24–213’’ to read ‘‘WC Docket No. 

24–213.’’ 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2024–21642 Filed 9–20–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS