alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

                                                               EXHIBIT 27.1 

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>     1000

<S>                                                <C>         <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                    3,660
<SECURITIES>                                              1,507 <F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          5,691
<PP&E>                                                      859 <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            6,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     1,079
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                5,339
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              5,339
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              0
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          1,127 <F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (1,582)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (1,582)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (1,582)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (0.22) <F4>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (0.22)

        

<FN>
<F1> Securities, Item 5-02(2) are net of accrued interest and unrealized 
     gain/loss.
<F2> Item shown net of allowance, consistent with the balance sheet 
     presentation.
<F3> Item consists of research and development.
<F4> Item consists of basic earnings per share.
</FN>
                                     
<PAGE>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Zones, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Firoz H. Lalji,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
November 14, 2008








/S/   FIROZ
      H LALJIFiroz
      H. LaljiChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TIB FINANCIAL CORP. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      15,988,564
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          25,107
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             9,792,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 15,726,177
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      44,445,122
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        42,379,854
<LOANS>                                    296,265,274
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,124,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             403,230,570
<DEPOSITS>                                 368,106,757
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,276,384
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          5,009,627
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       449,414
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,388,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             403,230,570
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,504,103
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              904,521
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                92,277
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,500,901
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,038,118
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,108,173
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,392,728
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  135,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,514,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,674,311
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,049,911
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,049,911
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.97
<LOANS-NON>                                     70,800
<LOANS-PAST>                                 2,002,176
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,996,532
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    7,353
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,124,179
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,124,179
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual report of Tutor Perini Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald N. Tutor, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March 4, 2011
/s/Ronald N. TutorRonald N. TutorChairman and Chief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tutor Perini Corporation and will be retained by Tutor Perini Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6764** 

EUGENE JACKSON , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. J. R. CARAWAY, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 01876

- WMN )

Submitted : September 17, 2013 Decided: October 4, 2013

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Eugene Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua L. Kaul, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eugene Ernst Jackson seeks to appe al : the district
court ’ s order s : treating his motion for reconsideration as a successive 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2013 ) motion and dismissing it on that basis; and denying his motion for reconsideration
. The district court’s order s are not appealabl e unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 06)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 5 29 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jackson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.3 Additionally, we construe Jackson ’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. See United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir
. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have foun d the movant guilty of the offense; or (2) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255(h) (West Supp. 2013). Jackson’s claims do not satisfy either of the se criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
#### VICK v. STATE.

No. 19896.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 8, 1938.

T. A. Graves, of Cuero, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for perjury, punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before this court without bills of exception or statement of facts. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 1

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-09-00147-CV

IN RE NYAGUDI OKUMU RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus

and is of the opinion that the petition should be dismissed as moot. We

have been informed by the trial court that it has directed relator’s release

from confinement, and the Tarrant County Sheriff has informed us that

relator has been released from confinement. Accordingly, relator’s petition

for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as moot.
2

Relator shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding, for which let

execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DELIVERED: June 30, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 184 (Monday, September 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 77512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21846]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Federal Register CITATION NOTICE OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 
    89 FR 75540.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 
    Thursday, September 19, 2024 at 10:00 a.m.
    Hybrid Meeting: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC (12th Floor) 
and Virtual.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: 
    The following item was also discussed:
    Proposed Referral of Questions on Dependent Care to Regulations 
Committee

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Laura E. Sinram,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-21846 Filed 9-19-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3043 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow allocation of certain 

renewable energy tax credits to Indian tribes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2015 

Mr. GRIJALVA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow allocation of certain renewable energy tax credits to Indian 

tribes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Tax Incentive 

5 for Renewable Energy Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ALLOCATION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY TAX CRED7 ITS TO INDIAN TRIBES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 48 of the 

9 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at 

10 the end the following new paragraph: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3043 IH

1 ‘‘(6) ALLOCATION OF CREDIT TO INDIAN

2 TRIBES.— 

3 ‘‘(A) ELECTION TO ALLOCATE.— 

4 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an 

5 Indian tribe, any portion of the credit de6 termined under this subsection for the tax7 able year may, at the election of such tribe, 

8 be transferred to another taxpayer. 

9 ‘‘(ii) FORM AND EFFECT OF ELEC10 TION.—An election under clause (i) for any 

11 taxable year shall— 

12 ‘‘(I) specify the TIN of each tax13 payer to whom credit is allocated, 

14 ‘‘(II) specify the percentage of 

15 the credit determined under this sub16 section to be allocated to each such 

17 taxpayer, and 

18 ‘‘(III) not take effect unless the 

19 Indian tribe designates the transfer as 

20 such in a written notice sent to such 

21 taxpayer. 

22 Such election for any taxable year shall be 

23 made on a timely filed return for such 

24 year, and, once made, shall be irrevocable 

25 for such taxable year. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3043 IH

1 ‘‘(B) ALLOCATION TO OTHER TAX2 PAYERS.—The amount of credit transferred to 

3 any taxpayer under subparagraph (A)— 

4 ‘‘(i) shall not be included in the 

5 amount determined under this subsection 

6 with respect to the Indian tribe for the 

7 taxable year, and 

8 ‘‘(ii) shall be included in the amount 

9 determined under this subsection for the 

10 taxable year of such taxpayer ending on or 

11 after the date on which the taxpayer re12 ceives the written designation under sub13 paragraph (A)(ii)(III). 

14 ‘‘(C) DEFINITION OF INDIAN TRIBE.—For 

15 purposes of this paragraph, the term ‘Indian 

16 tribe’ has the meaning given such term by sec17 tion 45A(c)(6).’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 this section shall apply to facilities placed in service on 

20 or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATIN EXTRACTED
FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SAID FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         427,689
<SECURITIES>                                 3,482,790
<RECEIVABLES>                                  356,024
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,220,358
<DEPRECIATION>                                 892,436
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,633,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,951,027
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (1,317,239)
<SALES>                                     17,841,417
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,138,950
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            26,910,071
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                53,774
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,824,895)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,824,895)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,824,895)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (1,699.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
### FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 07/22/99 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 97-4076

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 96-646-CR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus KHADIJAH S. CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________ (July 22, 1999) Before RONEY and LAY * , Senior Circuit Judges. ** PER CURIAM:

_______________ *Honorable Donald P. Lay, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation. ** This decision is rendered by a quorum, due to the retirement of then-Chief Judge Hatchett on May 14, 1999. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).2 On April 21, 1998, we filed an opinion vacating the judgment in this case and remanding for re-sentencing. United States v. Campbell , 139 F.3d 820 (11th Cir. 1998). Our decision followed the same line of reasoning as a prior panel of this circuit in United States v. DeVaron , 136 F.3d 740 (11th Cir. 1998). We held that it was improper for the sentencing court to c onsider a fact that “relates solely to Campbell’s status as a drug courier,” citing United States v. Velosa , 83 F.3d 380 (11th Cir. 1996). On motion of the government, we stay ed the mandate in this case until rehearing en banc of DeVaron. The full court has now issued its opinion which overrules the precedents set in United States v. Velosa , 83 F.3d 380 (11th Cir. 1996) and United States v. DeVaron , 136 F.3d 740 (11th Cir. 1998). See United States v. DeVaron , 175 F.3d 930, 11th Cir. 1999 (en banc). In light of that en banc opinion, we vacate our prior opinion and affirm the judgment and sentence in this case. It was not improper for the district court to rely on factors relating to defendant’s status as a drug courier in de nying her a minor role adjustment. A review of the record reveals that there was no clear error in the determination that defendant was not entitled to a minor role adjustment in her sentence. AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          12,611
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,095
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,100
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     97,357
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        105,304
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,128
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,094
<DEPOSITS>                                     208,176
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,141
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,124
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           637
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 232,094
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,911
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,406
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   591
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,908
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,933
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,020
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,888
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 109
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,362
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,362
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,017
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.02
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.57
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,202
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,150
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  7,794
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   904
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      755
<RECOVERIES>                                       406
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,128
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,128
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             52
        

</TABLE>