alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129588 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129588 

 COA: 253620 

Oakland CC: 2003-189705-FH 

MICHAEL LEE MONROE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 11, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 

881 (2005). 

d1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 10

- 00067

- CR

No. 10

- 10

- 00068

- CR

SHERYL MARIE FANNIN

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 413th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No s

. F40482 and F40952

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Sh eryl Marie Fannin appealed the trial court ’ s judgments revoking her

community supervision but has now filed motions requesting this Court to dismiss the

appeals. Fannin personally signed the motions to dismiss.

Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed. T E X

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a).

TOM GRAY

Chief JusticeFannin v. State Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Appeals dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed May 12, 2010

Do not publish

[CR25]
Athens Plant Complex

A11 Stack

A12 Stack

Furnace BaMelter Dust 

A23 Stack; idled 10/07 E
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
        THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
        STATEMENTS OF INCOME, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, AND CONSOLIDATED
        STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
        SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                            PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   1,446,661
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    43,707
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                        314,158
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       23,410
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 76,564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,904,500
<COMMON>                                      293,691
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                           0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                           447,670
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                741,361
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                          516,604
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  8,900
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  10,400
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                627,235
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               1,904,500
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   1,138,057
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           44,644
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    979,604
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  1,024,248
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                       113,809
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              4,806
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                118,615
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       39,192
<NET-INCOME>                                   79,423
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  79,423
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       66,875
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      35,757
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        158,647
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    2.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    2.25

        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2812 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2812

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 
         premiums for insurance which constitutes medical care.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 2015

   Mr. King of Iowa (for himself, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, Mr. 
   Fleming, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Yoho, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. 
 LaMalfa, Mr. Babin, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Pittenger, Mr. Franks of 
Arizona, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Huelskamp, Mr. Hultgren, Mr. Issa, 
   Mr. Cole, Mr. Burgess, Mr. DesJarlais, Mr. Brooks of Alabama, Mr. 
   Ribble, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Rouzer, and Mrs. Blackburn) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 
         premiums for insurance which constitutes medical care.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tax Free Health Insurance Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR PREMIUMS FOR HEALTH INSURANCE.

    (a) In General.--Part VII of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating section 224 
as section 225 and by inserting after section 223 the following new 
section:

``SEC. 224. DEDUCTION FOR PREMIUMS FOR HEALTH INSURANCE.

    ``In the case of an individual, there shall be allowed as a 
deduction to the taxpayer for the taxable year amounts paid by the 
taxpayer for insurance which constitutes medical care (as defined in 
section 213(d)) for the taxpayer and the taxpayer's spouse and 
dependents. No amount shall be taken into account under the preceding 
sentence if a deduction or credit is allowed for such amount under this 
chapter or to any other taxpayer.''.
    (b) Deduction Allowed Whether or Not Individual Itemizes Other 
Deductions.--Subsection (a) of section 62 of such Code is amended by 
inserting before the last sentence at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(22) Deduction for premiums for health insurance.--The 
        deduction allowed by section 224.''.
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for part VII of 
subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by striking the item 
relating to section 224 and adding at the end the following new items:

``Sec. 224. Deduction for premiums for health insurance.
``Sec. 225. Cross reference.''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 46249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18733]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of Business Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Friday, August 15, 2014; 9:30 a.m. EST.

PLACE: 1331 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite 1150, Washington, DC 20425.

Business Meeting Agenda

I. Program Planning
     Discussion and Vote on Part A & Part B of the briefing 
report: Increasing Compliance with Section 7 of the NVRA
II. Management and Operations
     Staff Director's Report
III. State Advisory Committee (SAC) Appointments
     Indiana
     North Carolina
     Oklahoma
     Virginia

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the briefing and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact Pamela 
Dunston at (202) 376-8105 or at signlanguage@usccr.gov at least seven 
business days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

    Dated: August 4, 2014.
David Mussatt,
Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2014-18733 Filed 8-5-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. 31,812

5 LARYE PARKINS,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY

8 Douglas R. Driggers, District Judge

9 Gary K. King, Attorney General

10 Ann M. Harvey, Assistant Attorney General

11 Santa Fe, NM

12 for Appellee

13 Jacqueline L. Cooper, Chief Public Defender

14 Kathleen T. Baldrige, Assistant Appellate Defender

15 Santa Fe, NM 

16 MEMORANDUM OPINION

17 GARCIA, Judge.
2

1 Defendant appeals his convictions for aggravated driving while intoxicated and

2 a related traffic offense. We issued a third calendar notice proposing to affirm.

3 Defendant has responded with a memorandum in opposition. We affirm.

4 Issue 1: Defendant has claimed that the district court should not have admitted

5 a police dispatch tape without testimony from Mesilla Valley Regional Dispatch

6 Authority. Our third calendar notice relied on information from the State that a proper

7 foundation was laid for the admission of the dispatch tape. Specifically, the

8 eyewitness who made the comments testified at trial concerning the statements.

9 [State’s MIO 3-4] We proposed to hold that the State therefore laid a proper

10 foundation by satisfying the express language of Rule 11-105 NMRA. In his

11 memorandum in opposition, Defendant does not dispute this information, and does not

12 provide a legal basis for challenging the admission. Accordingly, we are not

13 persuaded by Defendant’s memorandum in opposition. See State v. Ibarra, 116 N.M.

14 486, 489, 864 P.2d 302, 305 (Ct. App. 1993) (observing that a party opposing

15 summary disposition is required to come forward and specifically point out errors in

16 fact and/or law).

17 Issues 2 and 3: Our third calendar notice continued to propose affirmance on

18 these issues. Defendant has not provided any additional argument. Accordingly, we

19 rely on our prior analysis. See State v. Sisneros, 98 N.M. 201, 202-03, 647 P.2d 403,

20 404-05 (1982) (“The opposing party to summary disposition must come forward and

21 specifically point out errors in fact and in law.”).
3

1 For the reasons stated above and in our third calendar notice, we affirm

2 Defendant’s convictions.

3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

4 

5 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

6 WE CONCUR:

7 

8 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

9 

10 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in hiscapacity as an officer of Channell Commercial Corporation (the “Company”), forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

 

·                  The QuarterlyReport of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter year ended March 31,2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

·                  The informationcontained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  May 13, 2008 |                              |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                     |                              |
|                     |                              |   |
|                     | /s/ William H. Channell, Jr. |   |
|                     | Name:                             | William  H. Channell, Jr. |
|                     | Title:                            | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                     |                              |   |
|                     |                              |   |
|                     | /s/ Patrick E. McCready           |   |
|                     | Name:                             | Patrick E. McCready |
|                     | Title:                            | Chief Financial Officer |
|                          |                                   |  |  |

 

----
# C_2023152EN.01001001.xml

| 28.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/10

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.62196

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 152/09)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 31.3.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.62196 |
| Member State | Denmark |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Alleged breach by the Kingdom of Denmark of the conditions set out in the Commission Decision SA. 39078 which Denmark implemented for Femern A/S |
| Legal basis | Act amending the Act on the construction and operation of the Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link and the hinterland connections in Denmark (Act no. 168 of 22 April 2021) |
| Type of measure | Ad Hoc Case
  Femern A/S and A/S Femern Landanlæg |
| Objective | Execution of an important project of common European interest |
| Form of aid | |
| Budget | Annual budget: 0 DKK |
| Intensity | Measure does not constitute aid |
| Duration | |
| Economic sectors | Construction of bridges and tunnels |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Danish Transport Ministry
  — |
| Other information | |

Date of adoption of the decision

31.3.2023

Aid number

SA.62196

Member State

Denmark

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Alleged breach by the Kingdom of Denmark of the conditions set out in the Commission Decision SA. 39078 which Denmark implemented for Femern A/S

Legal basis

Act amending the Act on the construction and operation of the Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link and the hinterland connections in Denmark (Act no. 168 of 22 April 2021)

Type of measure

Ad Hoc Case

Femern A/S and A/S Femern Landanlæg

Objective

Execution of an important project of common European interest

Form of aid

Budget

Annual budget: 0 DKK

Intensity

Measure does not constitute aid

Duration

Economic sectors

Construction of bridges and tunnels

Name and address of the granting authority

Danish Transport Ministry

—

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
## DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION

Standard Operating Permit Cond ition VI – Good Air Pollution Control Practices

Permit Condition for Air Quality Permits Adopted by Reference in 18 AAC 50.346

April 1, 2002

REVISED August 25, 2004Standard Operating Permit Condition VI – 1 April 1, 2002
Good Air Pollution Control Practices Revised August 25, 2004 

## Standard Operating Permit Cond ition VI – Good Air Pollution Control Practices

Emission Unit [SOURCE] Categories This Condition Applies to: All emission units [SOURCES] that are not insignificant or that use a control device, except that standard permit condition VI does not apply

1. to any emission unit [SOURCE] subject to an emission standard in 40 C.F.R. 60, 40 C.F.R. 61, or 40 C.F.R. 63; or
2. if, for each emissions standard that applies, th ere is continuous emissions monitoring or the permit writer finds that continuous parametric monitoring or frequency of other periodic monitoring is sufficient that equipment performance affecting emissions will not deteriorate between monitoring events.

The department will use standard permit c ondition VI in any operating permit unless the department determines that emission unit [SOURCE] or stationary source [FACILITY]specific conditions more adequately meet the requirements of 18 AAC 50.

Permit Wording:

1. Good Air Pollution Control Practice.

1.1 The permittee shall do the following for emission units [SOURCES] <identify emission units [SOURCES]>:

a. perform regular maintenance consideri ng the manufacturer’s or the operator’s maintenance procedures;

b. keep records of any maintenance that would have a significant effect on emissions; the records may be kept in electronic format;

c. keep a copy of either the manufactur er’s or the operator’s maintenance procedures.

The following applies to this standard permit condition:
1. Condition VI.1.1 will

- list all emission units [SOURCES] with a control device ; and

- for emission units [SOURCES] without a contro l device, list only those emission
units [SOURCES] that are not insignif icant under 18 AAC 50.326(d) - (i).
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

                                        Re: Colonial Realty Limited Partnership
                                            (File No. 0-20707)
                                            Registrations on Form S-3


We are aware that our report dated August 13, 2003 on our review of interim
financial information of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the three and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 and included in the Partnership's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the periods then ended, is incorporated by
reference in the registration statement on Form S-3 related to the Shelf
Registration filed on May 25, 2000 (File No. 333-37922). Pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered a part of
the registration statement prepared or certified by us within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



                                         /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                             PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Birmingham, Alabama
August 13, 2003
<Page>
                                   EXHIBIT 21
                   SUBSIDIARIES OF MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                                     SHAREHOLDING
                                                                                    AT END OF YEAR
                                                                JURISDICTION      -------------------
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY(1)                                         OF INCORPORATION     DIRECT    INDIRECT
---------------------                                         -----------------   --------   --------
<S>                                                           <C>                 <C>        <C>
Mercer Investments AG.......................................   Switzerland          100%         --
Dresden Papier GmbH.........................................     Germany              --       100%
Papierfabrik Fahrbrucke GmbH................................     Germany              --       100%
Spezialpapierfabrik Blankenstein GmbH.......................     Germany              --       100%
Zellstoff-und Papierfabrik Rosenthal GmbH & Co. KG..........     Germany              --       100%
Landqart AG.................................................   Switzerland            --       100%
</Table>

------------------------

(1) All the subsidiaries are conducting business under their own names.
NO TF O R P UB LICATIO N IN W E ST' S H AWAII REP ORTS O R TH E P ACIF IC REP O RTER

NO. CAAP-21-0000045
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I LARRY CARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PIILANI HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; KIAKONA KAPONO; PORTER McQUIRE KIAKONA AND CHOW; JACK NAIDITCH; CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS; KIA JOHNSON CHANNEL; CHAD NEWMAN; ANGELINA CAMPOS; UNKNOWN SQUATERS UPSTAIRS AT 214 LUAKAHA CIRCLE, Defendants-Appellees
A PPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

(CASE NO. 2CCV-20-0000314)
ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF APPEAL (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, and Leonard and Wadsworth, JJ.) Upon consideration of the "Notice of Larry Card's Withdrawal of Appeal Due to Severe Health Problems" filed on January 19, 2022, by self-represented Plaintiff-Appellant Larry Card (Appellant), the record, and there being no opposition, we construe Appellant's notice to be a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, February 16, 2022.
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge
/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge
/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-21-0000045 16-FEB-2022 08:04 AM Dkt. 70 OGMD
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 28, 2014

t0224

Order 

Clerk

February 28, 2014

148070

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148070

COA: 317321 

Wayne CC: 09-027517-FC

LEONARDROW LEWIS SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 24, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).