alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022402EN.01001701.xml

| 19.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/17

---

Notice to economic operators

New round of requests for the suspension of the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on certain industrial and agricultural products

(2022/C 402/10)

Economic operators are informed that the Commission has received requests in accordance with the administrative arrangements foreseen in the Commission Communication concerning autonomous tariff suspensions and quotas (2011/C 363/02) (1) for the July round of 2023.

The list of the products for which a duty suspension is requested is now available on the Commission's thematic (Europa) website on the customs union (2).

Economic operators are also informed that the deadline for objections against new requests to reach the Commission, via the national administrations, is 16 December 2022 which is the date of the second scheduled meeting of the Economic Tariff Questions Group.

Interested operators are advised to consult the list regularly in order to be informed on the status as the requests.

More information on the autonomous tariff suspension procedure can be found on the Europa website:

Suspensions (Autonomous Tariff Suspensions) (europa.eu)

---

(1)  OJ C 363, 13.12.2011, p. 6.

(2)  Suspensions - Home Page (europa.eu)

---
# C_2023137EN.01000101.xml

| 20.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/1

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.10896– ORANGE / MASMOVIL / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 137/01)

On 3 April 2023, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference No. M.10896– ORANGE / MASMOVIL / JV, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
exv10w5



 





Exhibit 10.5




October 26, 2004




Mr. Chad C. Deaton

13914 I.O. Court

Willis, Texas 77318



Dear Chad:



On October 25, 2004, Baker Hughes Incorporated (the “Company”) awarded you
80,000 restricted shares of the Common Stock of the Company, subject to the
restrictions, terms and conditions described in your Employment Agreement. A
certificate representing the 80,000 shares will be issued in your name and held
in the Company’s possession for safekeeping until they vest in accordance with
the restrictions, terms and conditions contained in the resolutions, at which
time the Company will deliver the shares to you.



Pending vesting of the restricted shares, you will earn dividends paid with
respect to the shares.




Sincerely yours,




/s/ H. John Riley, Jr.

H. John Riley, Jr.

Chairman, Compensation Committee

of the Board of Directors of

Baker Hughes Incorporated
# Official Journal L 148/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 148 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 594 June 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 148

English edition

Legislation

Volume 594 June 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/885 of 3 June 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 as regards the substance ‘eprinomectin’ (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/886 of 3 June 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 4 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/887 of 2 June 2016 amending Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC as regards the list of third countries or parts thereof from which the introduction into the Union of meat products and treated stomachs, bladders and intestines is authorised
  (notified under document C(2016) 3215)

   (
  1
  ) | 6 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/885 of 3 June 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 as regards the substance ‘eprinomectin’ (
  1
  )

1

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/886 of 3 June 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

4

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/887 of 2 June 2016 amending Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC as regards the list of third countries or parts thereof from which the introduction into the Union of meat products and treated stomachs, bladders and intestines is authorised
  (notified under document C(2016) 3215)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2016) 3215)

1

6

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# C_2022404EN.01000601.xml

| 20.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 404/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 404/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10852 – 3D SYSTEMS / DUSSUR / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 404/03)

On 12 October 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10852. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10852. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification****of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Shelby Acquisition I, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      James R. Kerr, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/James
                R. KerrJames
                R. KerrPrincipal
                Executive OfficerPrincipal
                Financial OfficerMarch
                17, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - 21 CFR Part 173
          - [Docket No. FDA-2023-F-2319]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notification; withdrawal of petition.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing the withdrawal, without prejudice to a future filing, of a food additive petition (FAP 2A4832) proposing that the food additive regulations for chlorine dioxide be amended to provide for an additional method for producing the additive.

      ( print page 78837)    

# DATES:

The food additive petition was withdrawn on March 4, 2024.

# ADDRESSES:

                        For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to                         *https://www.regulations.gov*                         and insert the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document into the “Search” box and follow the prompts, and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Hall, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-9195.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In a notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                     of June 21, 2023 (88 FR 40122), we announced that we had filed a food additive petition (FAP 2A4832), submitted by Burdock Group Consultants on behalf of PHM Brands, 730 17th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202. The petition proposed to amend the food additive regulations in § 173.300 (21 CFR 173.300*Chlorine dioxide*) to provide for production of the additive via an electrolytic method from a brine solution containing chloride salts. PHM Brands has now withdrawn the petition without prejudice to a future filing (21 CFR 171.7).                

Dated: September 20, 2024.

Lauren K. Roth,

Associate Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-21934 Filed 9-25-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
Exhibit 23(d)





[MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. LETTERHEAD]





CONSENT OF OIL AND GAS CONSULTANT

As oil and gas consultants, we hereby consent to the use of our name and our report dated October 5, 2000 in this Form 10-K, incorporated by reference into Peoples Energy Corporation's previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 2-82760,
33-6369, 333-17701, 33-63193 and 333-09993.

| | MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.       
| | -----------------------------
| |                              
| | By  /s/  Christopher A. Butta
| | Christopher A. Butta         
| | Senior Vice President        



Houston, Texas

December 14, 2000
Order filed October 1, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00287-CR

____________

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

JOAN FRANCES STUKES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 13-DCR-064055A

ORDER

This case was submitted on the briefs on September 2, 2015. The appellee is 

represented by counsel, who filed a brief on her behalf on July 6, 2015. On August 

27, 2015, the court received a letter from the appellee that contains substantive 

arguments about the appeal. A party represented by counsel is not entitled to 

hybrid representation. Patrick v. State, 906 S.W. 2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1995). Therefore, the court will not consider the letter.

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME, BALANCE SHEET, AND CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000075527
<NAME> PACIFIC ENTERPRISES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        3,074
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        271
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,103
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           394
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     135
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,977
<COMMON>                                         1,064
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                372
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   1,389
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         80
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                               988
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 354
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      148
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   2,018
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    4,977
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        2,738
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               151
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           0
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       2,339
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            438
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  39
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     438
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           103
<NET-INCOME>                                       184
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          4
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      180
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           122
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             350
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.21
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023195EN.01001401.xml

| 2.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/14

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.106697

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 195/13)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 27.4.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.106697 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Atualização do mapa dos auxílios com finalidade regional para Portugal (1 de janeiro de 2022 — 31 de dezembro de 2027) |
| Legal basis | N/A |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Regional development |
| Form of aid | |
| Budget | Overall budget: 0 EUR
  Annual budget: 0 EUR |
| Intensity | 40,0  % |
| Duration | |
| Economic sectors | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Agência para o Desenvolvimento e Coesão, I.P. |
| Rua 5 de Outubro, 153, 1050-053 Lisboa |

Date of adoption of the decision

27.4.2023

Aid number

SA.106697

Member State

Portugal

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Atualização do mapa dos auxílios com finalidade regional para Portugal (1 de janeiro de 2022 — 31 de dezembro de 2027)

Legal basis

N/A

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Regional development

Form of aid

Budget

Overall budget: 0 EUR

Annual budget: 0 EUR

Intensity

40,0  %

Duration

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Agência para o Desenvolvimento e Coesão, I.P.

Rua 5 de Outubro, 153, 1050-053 Lisboa

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report (the Report) of Powell Industries, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Don R. Madison, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                           |                                                                            
|-------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:    December 31, 2003 | /s/ DON R. MADISONDon R. Madison
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-4315

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JEMALL ROBERT BLYTHE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,

Chief District Judge. (5:13-cr-00206-D-1)

Submitted: March 8, 2016 Decided: March 22, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sarah Jessica Farber, FARBER LAW FIRM, Raleigh, North Carolina, 

for Appellant. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jemall Robert Blythe appeals the district court’s judgment 

revoking his probation and sentencing him to 11 months’ 

imprisonment. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that she has found no 

meritorious grounds for appeal but questioning whether the 

sentence was substantively reasonable. Blythe was advised of 

his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, but has not done 

so.

We review a sentence imposed on revocation of probation 

under the same standard as a sentence imposed on revocation of 

supervised release. United States v. Moulden, 478 F.3d 652, 655 

(4th Cir. 2007). “A district court has broad discretion when 

imposing a [revocation] sentence.” United States v. Webb, 738 

F.3d 638, 640 (4th Cir. 2013). “We will affirm a revocation 

sentence if it is within the statutory maximum and is not 

‘plainly unreasonable.’” Id. In conducting this review, we 

assess the sentence for reasonableness, utilizing “the 

procedural and substantive considerations” employed in 

evaluating an original criminal sentence. United States v. 

Crudup, 461 F.3d 433, 438 (4th Cir. 2006). Only if a sentence 

is unreasonable will we “then decide whether the sentence is 

plainly unreasonable.” Id. at 439. A sentence is presumed 

reasonable if it is within a range properly calculated under 
3

Chapter Seven of the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual. 

Webb, 738 F.3d at 642. We hold that Blythe has failed to rebut 

the presumption that his within-range sentence is reasonable.

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire 

record for any meritorious grounds for appeal and have found 

none. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. 

This court requires that counsel inform Blythe, in writing, of 

his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for 

further review. If Blythe requests that a petition be filed, 

but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, 

counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from 

representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof 

was served on Blythe. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
#### MONROE v. STATE.

No. 20525.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 1, 1939.

B. F. Patterson, of San Antonio, and Frank W. Steinle, of Jourdanton, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES,' Jiidge.

Conviction is for theft; punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for a term of three years.

The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception. The indictment seems to be in proper form. All matters of procedure appearing regular, the judgment will be affirmed.