alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, AND 
THE SUMMARY OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY CONTAINED IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 
10-Q TO WHICH THIS EXHIBIT IS ATTACHED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL SCHEDULES. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                 341,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    8,200
<INVENTORY>                                   482,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              820,600 
<PP&E>                                        557,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                271,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,269,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         404,500
<BONDS>                                       257,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       39,300
<OTHER-SE>                                    420,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,269,100
<SALES>                                     1,450,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,450,000
<CGS>                                       1,281,500         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,281,500 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             17,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                53,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                   22,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            31,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   31,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .80
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023311EN.01001001.xml

| 1.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/10

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.102909

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 311/09)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 8.8.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.102909 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Region | VLAAMS GEWEST, REG.BRUXELLES-CAP./BRUSSELS HFDST.GEW. |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Crossmediaal Consortium vzw |
| Legal basis | (a) | Decreet houdende de uitgavenbegroting van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap voor het begrotingsjaar 2022. (b) Nota aan de Vlaamse Regering inzake de investerings- en projectsubsidie om uitvoering te geven aan het Crossmediaal Meetsysteem in het kader van het relanceplan Vlaamse Veerkracht (VV133). (c) Projectplan XMM: de ontwikkeling van een crossmediaal meetsysteem. (d) Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering betreffende de toekenning van een investerings- en projectsubsidie aan Crossmediaal Consortium vzw voor ‘Crossmediaal Meetsysteem’ in uitvoering van het digitaal transformatieprogramma voor de Vlaamse media (VV133). |

Date of adoption of the decision

8.8.2023

Aid number

SA.102909

Member State

Belgium

Region

VLAAMS GEWEST, REG.BRUXELLES-CAP./BRUSSELS HFDST.GEW.

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Crossmediaal Consortium vzw

Legal basis

(a)

Decreet houdende de uitgavenbegroting van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap voor het begrotingsjaar 2022. (b) Nota aan de Vlaamse Regering inzake de investerings- en projectsubsidie om uitvoering te geven aan het Crossmediaal Meetsysteem in het kader van het relanceplan Vlaamse Veerkracht (VV133). (c) Projectplan XMM: de ontwikkeling van een crossmediaal meetsysteem. (d) Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering betreffende de toekenning van een investerings- en projectsubsidie aan Crossmediaal Consortium vzw voor ‘Crossmediaal Meetsysteem’ in uitvoering van het digitaal transformatieprogramma voor de Vlaamse media (VV133).

Type of measure

Ad Hoc Case

Objective

Sectorial development

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 4 000 000 EUR

Intensity

70,0  %

Duration

1.7.2023 — 31.12.2026

Economic sectors

Motion picture, video and television programme activities, Other information service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

| Vlaamse Overheid — Departement Cultuur, Jeugd en Media |
| --- |
| Arenbergstraat 9, 1000 Brussel |

Vlaamse Overheid — Departement Cultuur, Jeugd en Media

Arenbergstraat 9, 1000 Brussel

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA

---
# Exhibit 32

# Certification Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as Adopted to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Photo Control Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the annual period
ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities listed below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge: (i) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|      |                                                                                                         |                |  |     |  |                             | 
|----- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------- | 
|      | Photo Control Corporation                                                                               |               
|Date: |                                                                                                         | March 19, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/   Curtis R. Jackels    
|      | Curtis R. JackelsChief Executive Officer,President, Secretary and Director(principal executive officer) |               
|Date: |                                                                                                         | March 19, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/   Christopher S. Lausen
|      | Christopher S. LausenTreasurer(principal financial and accounting officer)                              |               

* A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Photo Control
Corporation and will be retained by Photo Control Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

43

---
A01A0963.

#### COLBERT v. THE STATE.

(547 SE2d 714)

Eldridge, Judge.

A Spalding County jury found Wilbert Colbert guilty of possession of cocaine. The charge arose when Colbert dropped to the ground a small red baggie of crack cocaine during his lawful arrest on a warrant for probation violation. Colbert appeals his conviction and, in his sole enumeration of error, claims that he was “denied his right of confrontation and due process under the United States Constitution when the State failed to produce physical evidence [the cocaine] at trial or explain its unavailability.” Upon review, we affirm Colbert’s conviction.

> (a) At trial, Colbert moved for a directed verdict, claiming

> [t]he State has not proved each and every essential element beyond a reasonable doubt. First of all we didn’t have any evidence that — there are no drugs in this case. There’s — you know, there’s no evidence that’s been presented to the jury that — of actually what the substance — any tangible evidence or what the substance was or what it looked like or anything to that degree. We would move for a directed verdict at this time.

Colbert’s claim went solely to the sufficiency of the evidence to prove his guilt. He did not claim a due process/confrontation clause violation based on the State’s failure to produce the cocaine at trial, and the trial court did not rule on such issue. “It is well settled that a reason urged by enumeration of error on appeal which is different from *80that urged below will not be considered for the first time on appeal.”1

Decided April 10, 2001.

*Virgil L. Brown & Associates, Larkin M. Lee,*for appellant.

*William T. McBroom III, District Attorney, Mark M. Irvin, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

(b) Colbert did not object to the testimony of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation Crime Lab technician that the substance in the red baggie tested positive for cocaine. Nor did Colbert make a motion to suppress or otherwise object to testimony regarding the cocaine based on any taint in the chain of custody. Thus, there was no error because “[t]he state is not required to introduce contraband into evidence to establish its case.”2

(c) Colbert did not seek an order for independent testing of the cocaine. Nor is there any evidence that an independent test would prove to be exculpatory. Accordingly, this Court’s decision in *State v.*

*Blackwell,*245 Ga. App. 135 (537 SE2d 457) (2000), is not implicated herein.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Andrews, P. J., and Miller, J., concur.*

1

 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) *Kight v. State,*242 Ga. App. 13, 18 (3) (528 SE2d 542) (2000).

2

 (Citations omitted.) *Williamson v. State,*142 Ga. App. 177, 179 (6) (235 SE2d 643) (1977).
Exhibit 23










                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
February 23, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Phillips Petroleum Company included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1997, in the following registration statements and related
prospectuses.

  Phillips Petroleum Company       Form S-3    File No. 33-51559

  Phillips Petroleum Company       Form S-3    File No. 33-54987

  Phillips Petroleum Company       Form S-3    File No. 333-01209

  Thrift Plan of Phillips
    Petroleum Company              Form S-8    File No. 33-50134

  Long-Term Stock Savings Plan of
    Phillips Petroleum Company     Form S-8    File No. 33-50283

  Retirement Savings Plan of
    Phillips Petroleum Company     Form S-8    File No. 33-28669

  Omnibus Securities Plan of
    Phillips Petroleum Company     Form S-8    File No. 333-31355




                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

                                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
February 23, 1998


<PAGE>
AMENDMENT TO
                              Employment Agreement


This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment"), dated as of March 29,
2004, is made and entered into by and between Scottish Re Group Limited, a
Cayman Islands, British West Indies company (the "Company") and Michael C.
French (the "Executive").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, on February 10, 2003, the Company and Executive executed an employment
agreement (the "Employment Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement; and

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements and covenants herein and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto covenant and agree to modify and amend
the Employment Agreement as follows:

Section 8

     (d)  Compensation upon Death . In the event of the Executive's death, the
          Company shall pay to the Executive (or beneficiaries, or estate, as
          the case may be) an amount equal to the sum of (i) the Compensation
          Payments, (ii) the Termination Bonus, if any, and (iii) an amount
          equal to the sum of the Total Cash Compensation Executive would have
          received during the remaining Term of the Agreement, such amount to be
          calculated from the date of the Executive's death (the "Death
          Calculation Period"). Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this
          Section 8(d), where the Death Calculation Period is for thirty-six
          (36) calendar months or less, the Company shall pay the Executive
          under 8(d)(iii) an amount equal to the sum of three (3) full year's
          Total Cash Compensation. Executive shall be entitled to any other
          rights, compensation and/or benefits as may be due to Executive in
          accordance with the terms and provision of any agreements, plans or
          programs of the Company.



<PAGE>


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly
executed and delivered as of the date first written above.



                                      /s/ Michael C. French
                                      ------------------------------
                                      Michael C. French


                                      SCOTTISH RE GROUP LIMITED



                                      By:  /s/ Scott Willkomm
                                           ------------------------
                                      Name:     Scott Willkomm
                                      Title:    Director




                                       2
### NUMBER 13 - 14 - 00 471 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS , RICHARD LEE WALLIS, RICHARD

FREYMANN, AND MARK HUGHES

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion 1 

### Per Curiam Relators, State Farm Lloyds , Richard L ee Wallis, Ri chard Freymann, and Mark Hughes, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court direct respondent, the Honorable Rose Guerra Reyna, Presiding Judge of the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, to withdraw her order denying relators’ verified plea in abatement and to enter an order abating the suit for damages brought agai nst relator s by the real part y in interest , Ascencion Martinez, u n til sixty days after he provide s relators

1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(d) ( “ When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. ” ); T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).2

with a notice letter for his claim stating the specific, separate amounts for the claimed damages and attorney’s fees. See T EX

. I NS

. C ODE A NN . § 541.154 (West , Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Prior Notice of Action”); id. § 541.155 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Abatement”); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.1 (“Commencement” of Original Proceedings). In addition, relators request that this Court issue immediate temporary relief staying respondent’s order denying the plea in abatement. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.10 (“Temporary Relief”).
T he Court, having examined and fully considered th e petition for wri t of mandamus and the applicable law, is of the opinion that th e petition for writ of mandamus should be denied for the reasons expressed in our opinion in In re State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freymann, and Nathan Burris , No. 13

- 14

- 00347

- CV, 2014 WL _____ (Tex . App.

— Corpus Christi Aug. 27, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.), available at http://www.search.txcourts.gov/case.aspx?cn=13

- 14

- 00348

- CV. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the petit ion for writ of mandamus and request for immediate temporary relief

. See T E X

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.8( d ). PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 2nd day of September, 2014.
Exhibit
      23(a)










**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in **** Registration
      Statements Nos. 333-84594 and 333-70702 on Form S-3, and 2-82760, 33-6369,
      033-63193, 333-62070, 333-113204, 333-116192 and 333-17701 on Form S-8, of
      Peoples Energy Corporation, of our report dated December 14, 2006 relating
      to
      the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of
      Peoples Energy Corporation (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
      includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of FASB Interpretation
      No. 47, “Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations”) and of our report dated
      December 14, 2006 relating to management’s report on the effectiveness of
      internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report
      on
      Form 10-K of Peoples Energy Corporation for the year ended September 30,
      2006.






DELOITTE
      & TOUCHE LLP




Chicago,
      Illinois


December
      14, 2006
# C_2023117EN.01001401.xml

| 31.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/14

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.104802

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 117/13)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 16.2.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.104802 |
| Member State | Hungary |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | A magyar sporttámogatási program meghosszabbítása (2023 — 2029) |
| Legal basis | 107/2011. (VI. 30.) Korm. rendelet a látvány-csapatsport támogatását biztosító támogatási igazolás kiállításáról, felhasználásáról, a támogatás elszámolásának és ellenőrzésének, valamint visszafizetésének szabályairól; — a társasági adóról és az osztalékadóról szóló 1996. évi LXXXI. törvény; — az illetékekről szóló 1990. évi XCIII. törvény |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Sectorial development |
| Form of aid | Tax rate reduction |
| Budget | Overall budget: 120 000 000 000 HUF
  Annual budget: 20 000 000 000 HUF |
| Intensity | 70,0  % |
| Duration | 1.7.2023 — 30.6.2029 |
| Economic sectors | Activities of sports clubs |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Honvédelmi Minisztérium |
| 1055 Budapest, Balaton utca 7-11. |

Date of adoption of the decision

16.2.2023

Aid number

SA.104802

Member State

Hungary

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

A magyar sporttámogatási program meghosszabbítása (2023 — 2029)

Legal basis

107/2011. (VI. 30.) Korm. rendelet a látvány-csapatsport támogatását biztosító támogatási igazolás kiállításáról, felhasználásáról, a támogatás elszámolásának és ellenőrzésének, valamint visszafizetésének szabályairól; — a társasági adóról és az osztalékadóról szóló 1996. évi LXXXI. törvény; — az illetékekről szóló 1990. évi XCIII. törvény

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Sectorial development

Form of aid

Tax rate reduction

Budget

Overall budget: 120 000 000 000 HUF

Annual budget: 20 000 000 000 HUF

Intensity

70,0  %

Duration

1.7.2023 — 30.6.2029

Economic sectors

Activities of sports clubs

Name and address of the granting authority

Honvédelmi Minisztérium

1055 Budapest, Balaton utca 7-11.

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
| (1)   | The      Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, filed with the      Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2008, fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended      September 30, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of New Century Equity      Holdings Corp. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/      Mark E. Schwarz         |   | Date:  | November      14, 2008 |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------|
|   | Mark      E. Schwarz             |   |   |
|   | Principal      Executive Officer |   |   |

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-30378

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DARRYL W. TAYLOR,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CV-261-B-M2

USDC No. 98-CR-24-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Darryl W. Taylor, federal prisoner # 02975-095, seeks leave

to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) to appeal the district

court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his

sentence based on retroactive Amendment 591 to the sentencing

guidelines. Taylor also moves for a certificate of appealability

(“COA”) arising out of the district court’s denial of his FED. R.

CRIM. P. 59(e) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. 

Because Taylor devotes his argument to the denial of his
No. 04-30378

-2-

§ 3582(c)(2) motion and does not challenge the denial of his

postjudgment motion, COA is DENIED as unnecessary.

By filing the IFP motion, Taylor is challenging the district

court’s certification decision that his appeal was not taken in

good faith because it is frivolous. See Baugh v. Taylor,

117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3);

FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(5). However, Taylor has not demonstrated

any nonfrivolous ground for appeal.

In 1998, Taylor pleaded guilty to distributing cocaine base,

in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and he was sentenced based

on the PSR’s determination that the offense involved 336.8 grams

of cocaine base. Taylor argues that Amendment 591 dictates that

he must be resentenced because no quantity of drugs was specified

in the indictment. He is mistaken. Amendment 591 applies to the

determination of the appropriate Chapter Two offense guideline

section, and Taylor was properly sentenced under U.S.S.G. 

§ 2D1.1, the appropriate offense guideline section for

convictions under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Amendment 591 is

irrelevant to the determination of base (or specific) offense

levels within the applicable offense guideline section or to any

consideration of relevant conduct. Taylor’s motion to proceed

IFP is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See

Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. We caution Taylor

that further frivolous filings will subject him to sanctions. 
No. 04-30378

-3-

COA DENIED AS UNNECESSARY; IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED;

SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
ESTIMATIONS OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND EFFECTS 

 IN SUPPORT OF 

U.S. EPA SUSTAINABLE FUTURES INITIATIVE