alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023258EN.01000101.xml

| 21.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.108091

(2023/C 258/01)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 6.7.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.108091 |
| Member State | France |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCTF: Dispositif exceptionnel de prise en charge des surcoûts des intrants des exploitations agricoles productrices de pommes de terre féculières |
| Legal basis | Projet de décision FranceAgriMer définissant les modalités de mise en œuvre du dispositif exceptionnel de prise en charge des surcoûts des intrants des exploitations agricoles productrices de pommes de terre féculières touchées par la hausse de leurs charges en intrants engendrée par les conséquences de l’agression de la Russie contre l’Ukraine |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 5 000 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 5 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Growing of non-perennial crops |
| Name and address of the granting authority | FranceAgriMer |
| 12 rue Henri Rol-Tanguy / TSA 20002 / 93555 Montreuil cedex |

Date of adoption of the decision

6.7.2023

Aid number

SA.108091

Member State

France

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCTF: Dispositif exceptionnel de prise en charge des surcoûts des intrants des exploitations agricoles productrices de pommes de terre féculières

Legal basis

Projet de décision FranceAgriMer définissant les modalités de mise en œuvre du dispositif exceptionnel de prise en charge des surcoûts des intrants des exploitations agricoles productrices de pommes de terre féculières touchées par la hausse de leurs charges en intrants engendrée par les conséquences de l’agression de la Russie contre l’Ukraine

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 5 000 000 EUR

Annual budget: 5 000 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Growing of non-perennial crops

Name and address of the granting authority

FranceAgriMer

12 rue Henri Rol-Tanguy / TSA 20002 / 93555 Montreuil cedex

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
Article 9 financial data schedule is restated for 10% stock dividend declared
September 28, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      45,691,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,557,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            10,030,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                514,175,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                  1,001,416,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  9,867,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,646,655,000
<DEPOSITS>                               1,388,498,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                49,943,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         18,218,000
<LONG-TERM>                                 30,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  9,250,000
<COMMON>                                       220,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 150,526,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,646,655,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             20,831,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            7,987,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               281,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            29,099,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          13,204,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,020,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       15,079,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  410,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           3,440,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             12,440,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,007,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   5,907,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,907,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.34
<LOANS-NON>                                  3,926,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,995,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               451,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            10,116,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  776,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   117,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            9,867,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         9,867,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21-1



                 PENNSYLVANIA ENTERPRISES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant


         The  following  are  subsidiaries  of  the  Registrant.   Their  voting
securities  are  owned  100%  by the  Registrant.  All of the  subsidiaries  are
incorporated in Pennsylvania.


                  PG Energy Inc.

                  Pennsylvania Energy Resources, Inc.

                  Theta Land Corporation

                  Pennsylvania Energy Marketing Company

                  Penn Gas Development Co.*

                  Keystone Pipeline Services, Inc.**

                  Honesdale Gas Company***

*      A subsidiary of PG Energy Inc. accounted for on the equity method which
       has not been consolidated since it is insignificant.

**     A subsidiary of Pennsylvania Energy Resources, Inc. ("PERI") included in
       the consolidation of PERI into the Registrant.

***    A subsidiary of PG Energy Inc. acquired on February 14, 1997.
Exhibit 10.5.5 

THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE ANNTAYLOR STORES CORPORATION 

2000 STOCK OPTION AND RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD PLAN

The AnnTaylor Stores Corporation 2000 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Award Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended effective as ofJanuary 26, 2006 (the “Effective Date”) with respect to all Options (as defined in the Plan) granted pursuant to the Plan, including grants outstanding before the Effective Date, as set forth below. 

1. The last two sentences of Section 6(i)(2) of the Plan are hereby amended and restated in their entirety to read as follows: 

“Following the Acceleration Event, the Committee may provide for the cancellation of all Options then outstanding. Upon such cancellation, theCorporation shall make, in exchange for each such Option, a payment either in (i) cash; (ii) shares of the successor entity; or (iii) some combination of cash or shares thereof, at the discretion of the Committee, and in each case inan amount per share subject to such Option equal to the difference between the per share exercise price of such Option and the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date during the prior sixty-day period that produces the highest FairMarket Value.” 

Except as set forth above, the Plan is hereby ratified and affirmed in all respects.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3017 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the maximum capital 

gains rate for individuals 15 percent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2015 

Mr. WILLIAMS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

the maximum capital gains rate for individuals 15 percent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Invest in America Act 

5 of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. 15 PERCENT MAXIMUM CAPITAL GAINS RATE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1(h) of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subparagraphs 

9 (C) and (D), by redesignating subparagraphs (E) and (F) 

10 as subparagraphs (D) and (E), respectively, and by insertVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:50 Jul 14, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3017.IH H3017

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3017 IH

1 ing after subparagraph (B) the following new subpara2 graph: 

3 ‘‘(C) 15 percent of the adjusted net capital 

4 gain (or, if less, taxable income) in excess of the 

5 amount on which a tax is determined under 

6 subparagraph (B),’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

9 December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# CI2022014EN.01000201.xml

| 12.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 14/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 14/2

---

Special report No 01/2022

EU support to the rule of law in the Western Balkans: despite efforts, fundamental problems persist

(2022/C 14 I/02)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that special report No 01/2022 ‘EU support to the rule of law in the Western Balkans: despite efforts, fundamental problems persist’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ Internet: http://eca.europa.eu

---
# Delegation of Authority Under Section 7019(e) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2024

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, the functions related to a comprehensive, multi-year strategy for the promotion of democracy abroad under section 7019(e) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2024 (Title VII of Division F of Public Law 118-47), and the accompanying Joint Explanatory Statement.

The delegation in this memorandum shall apply to any provision of any future public law that is the same or substantially the same as the provision referenced in this memorandum.

                    The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. 2024-21945

Billing code 4710-10-P
#### Knall Beverage, Inc., Appellant, *v.*Bodey et al., Board of Liquor Control, et al., Appellees. Goebel Brewing Co., Appellant, *v.*Bodey et al., Board of Liquor Control, et al., Appellees.

(Nos. 28839 and 28840

Decided December 24, 1941.)

*Messrs. Ballard c& Dreshaoh*and *Messrs. Race, Haass, Allen $ Brewer,*for appellants. .

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, *Mr. David M. Spriggs*and *Mr. Arthur W. Galloway,*for appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that these appeals as of right he, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeals dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 24, 2023

No. 04-22-00534-CR

EX PARTE Sergio Misael MONSIVAIS AVITIA

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10431CR

Honorable Dennis Powell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Pending before the court is appellant’s request to file supplemental briefing. We hereby 

GRANT appellant’s request and ORDER that appellant’s supplemented appellant’s brief is 

accepted as filed. It is ORDERED that the State may file a brief in response to appellant’s 

supplemented appellant’s brief within twenty days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on January 24, 2023.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

FILE COPY
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 15, 2020

No. 04-20-00412-CV

INTEREST OF L.A.C., A.I.A.C, S.A.C., H.A.C.,

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019PA00887

Honorable Linda A. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights, 

which must be disposed of by this Court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. 

TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. Appellee has filed a motion for extension of time to file its brief. 

Appellee’s motion is GRANTED, and appellee’s brief is due on November 16, 2020. 

Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for 

extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of October, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### COLLIFLOWER v. STATE.

No. 24170.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 24, 1948.

*180No appearance for appellant.

.Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was charged by indictment with the offense of robbery by assault. Upon his plea of guilty he was convicted by a jury and his punishment assessed at five years in the penitentiary.

The record, as brought forward, is without bills of exception or a statement of facts. The proceedings ar<e regular and nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
**Exhibit      12**

**North      Shore Gas Company and Subsidiary Companies**

**Statement      Re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**

|                                                             |   | *Fiscal                years ended September 30,* |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                        |   |                                              | *2006* |   |   | *2005* |   |   | *2004* |   |   | *2003* |   |   | *2002* |   |
|                                                        |   |                                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net                Income Before Preferred                  |   |                                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Stock                Dividends                              |   | $                                                 | 6,707  |   | $ | 11,397 |   | $ | 11,076 |   | $ | 14,545 |   | $ | 12,921 |   |
|                                                        |   |                                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Add                - Income Taxes                           |   |                                              | 3,797  |   |   | 6,656 |   |   | 6,743 |   |   | 8,712 |   |   | 7,916 |   |
| Fixed                Charges excluding capitalized interest |   |                                              | 4,071  |   |   | 3,706 |   |   | 3,688 |   |   | 3,603 |   |   | 5,045 |   |
|                                                        |   |                                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Earnings                                                    |   | $                                                 | 14,575 |   | $ | 21,759 |   | $ | 21,507 |   | $ | 26,860 |   | $ | 25,882 |   |
|                                                        |   |                                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed                Charges including capitalized interest |   | $                                                 | 4,071  |   | $ | 3,706 |   | $ | 3,688 |   | $ | 3,603 |   | $ | 5,045 |   |
|                                                        |   |                                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio                of Earnings to Fixed Charges           |   |                                              | 3.58   |   |   | 5.87 |   |   | 5.83 |   |   | 7.45 |   |   | 5.13 |   |
U
.S
. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 

# MAY 0

**~** 

## 2D15

Mr. Rafael Gustavo Fassina Marques Airworthiness Office Embraer S.A. Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2.170 12227-901

- S.J. dos Campos- SP Brasil Dear Mr. Marques: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue , S.W
. Renton , Washington 98057-3356

We have received your petition letter no. GCF-0332/2015, dated March 24 , 2015 , on behalf of Embraer S.A. , requesting an amendment to exemption no. 10338. That exemption provided relief from§§ 25.813(e) of Title 14, Code ofFederal Regulations , regarding a door between any passenger seat and an emergency exit on Embraer Model EMB-550 airplanes. Your request for amendment, if granted , would include in the exemption the derivative Model EMB-545 airplane. Your petition has been added to public docket no. FAA-2011-0327 and is being processed
. We will contact you if we need additional information
. We will advise you ofour final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have questions in the meantime , you may call Jayson Claar at (425) 227-2194 , e-mail jayson.claar@ faa.gov. Sincerely,

Mark Forseth Standardi zation Branch Transpmi Airplane Directorate Federal Aviation Admini stration
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, H. Irwin Levy, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of nStor Technologies, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) Intentionally omitted.

     c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

|                           |
|---------------------------|
| Date: March 23, 2004 |        | By: /s/ H. Irwin Levy |
|                           |  |  |
|                           |  | H. Irwin Levy*  Chief Executive Officer* |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 12, 2017

s0411 

# Order

Clerk April 12, 2017

155538 & (16)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MI CHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 155538

COA: 337149

Genesee CC: 2016

- 040281

- FC

ELRAY CHEVEZ BAKER,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal the March 29, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented

should be reviewed by this Court.