alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023291EN.01000101.xml

| 18.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 291/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 291/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107099

(2023/C 291/01)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 4.7.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107099 |
| Member State | Austria |
| Region | Austria |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Qualitätsprogramme und Qualitätszeichen AMA-Biosiegel und AMA-Gütesiegel |
| Legal basis | AMA-Gesetz 1992, BGBl. Nr. 376/1992 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas, Aid for information and promotion activities concerning cotton and foodstuffs covered by a quality scheme |
| Form of aid | Subsidised services |
| Budget | Overall budget: 63 160 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 15 790 000 EUR |
| Intensity | 100,0  % |
| Duration | 1.1.2024 — 31.1.2027 |
| Economic sectors | Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Agrarmarkt Austria Marketing GmbH |
| Dresdner Straße 68a, 1200 Wien |

Date of adoption of the decision

4.7.2023

Aid number

SA.107099

Member State

Austria

Region

Austria

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Qualitätsprogramme und Qualitätszeichen AMA-Biosiegel und AMA-Gütesiegel

Legal basis

AMA-Gesetz 1992, BGBl. Nr. 376/1992

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas, Aid for information and promotion activities concerning cotton and foodstuffs covered by a quality scheme

Form of aid

Subsidised services

Budget

Overall budget: 63 160 000 EUR

Annual budget: 15 790 000 EUR

Intensity

100,0  %

Duration

1.1.2024 — 31.1.2027

Economic sectors

Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Agrarmarkt Austria Marketing GmbH

Dresdner Straße 68a, 1200 Wien

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2840 

To prohibit any appropriation of funds for the Science and Technology 

account of the Environmental Protection Agency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2015 

Mr. SALMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To prohibit any appropriation of funds for the Science and 

Technology account of the Environmental Protection Agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FUNDING PROHIBITION. 

4 No funds are authorized to be appropriated for the 

5 Science and Technology account of the Environmental 

6 Protection Agency. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the quarter ended June
30, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Colonial Realty Limited
Partnership.
 /s/ Weston M. AndressWeston M. AndressChief Financial and Investment
Officer of Colonial Properties Trust,
the general partner of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership
Date: November 9, 2005 41
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of First Merchants
 Corporation on Form S-8 (File Number 333-50484) of our report dated June 11, 2020, on our audits
 of the financial statements of First Merchants Corporation Retirement Income and Savings Plan for
 the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, which report is included in this Annual Report on
 Form 11-K.
 
 
 /s/ BKD, LLP
 
 Indianapolis, Indiana
 June 11, 2019
#### WISENER v. STATE.

No. 19352.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 23, 1938.

E. J. Conn., of Lufkin, and Denman & Fowler, of Nacogdoches, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is rape; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for fifteen years.

Prosecutrix, Maxine Wisener, is the daughter of appellant, and at the time of the alleged offense was fourteen years of age. According to her testimony, appellant had sexual intercourse with her on the 5th of April, 1936, in a cornfield not far from the family residence. Further, she testified that she and appellant were standing at the time appellant accomplished his purpose.'

Appellant did not testify, and introduced no defensive testimony.

The State’s attorney before this court confesses error as to two of the bills of exception relating to argument of counsel for the State. One statement of counsel in argument to the jury was as follows : “The testimony stands uncontradicted that the defendant is' the author of the downfall of this little girl.” We quote the other statement: “Maxine (prosecutrix) said he did do it, and to this good hour this statement has not been challenged.” We agree with the State’s attorney that said bills present reversible error. Article 710, C.C.P., reads as follows: “Any defendant in a criminal action shall be permitted to testify in his own behalf therein, but the failure of any defendant to so testify shall not be taken as a circumstance against him, nor shall the same be alluded to or commented on by counsel in the cause.”

*244The provisions of this article .are mandatory. Only appellant could have denied that he had sexual relations with his daughter on the occasion in question. Hence it is clear that the remarks of counsel constituted a comment on the failure of the appellant to testify. See Opp v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 103 S.W.2d 748.

We think bills of exception 7 to 10, both inclusive, set forth testimony which was improperly admitted over appellant’s objection. Most of the testimony revealed by •said bills appears to have been hearsay.

The judgment is reversed and the cause .remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals .and approved by the court.
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 1, 2010 | /s/Ronald      N. Tutor                   |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                     | Ronald      N. Tutor                      |
|                     | Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Symons International Group, Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Douglas  H. Symons, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18  U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/  Douglas  H.  Symons
------------------------
Douglas  H.  Symons
Chief  Executive  Officer
July  15,  2003
# C_2022404EN.01000501.xml

| 20.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 404/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 404/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10863 – HANWHA Q CELLS / ENERCITY / LYNQTECH)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 404/02)

On 13 October 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10863. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10863. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
From:      "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To:           Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date:       08/30/2010 05:01 PM

Subject:  Part of E.O. 12866 Review: EPA Staff response to revisions to preamble on alternatives to

closure/conversion pertaining to NESHAP: Mercury Emissions from Mercury Cell Chlor‐Alkali Plants

2060‐AN99

Hi Sharon,

Here's the information we found that relates to #1 ‐‐ we can discuss more tomorrow.

http://www.ashtachemicals.com/PressReleases/Sept21_2004.pdf

Regards,

Cortney

‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ 

From: Nizich.Sharon@epamail.epa.gov [

mailto:Nizich.Sharon@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 2:19 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Cc: Fruh.Steve@epamail.epa.gov; thrift.mike@epamail.epa.gov; Chamberlin.JohnB@epamail.epa.gov;

Jones.Donnalee@epamail.epa.gov; norwood.phil@ecrweb.com; Walton.Tom@epamail.epa.gov;

Lamson.Amy@epamail.epa.gov; Evans.Ron@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Fw: Revisions to preamble on alternatives to closure/conversion

Hello Cortney‐ 

I am sending you a few pages of additions to the preamble in response to the flexibility you requested

we give to plant operators.  OGC had revised this and added a few points, mainly:

1.  I believe there was some information received (by OMB?) that led to this request for comment,

which identifies the possibility of 0 mercury emissions without closure or conversion.  We will need that

material so we can add it to the docket.  You'll see reference to it highlighted in yellow.

2.  OGC makes the point that we may need yet another supplemental if we do receive data/information

that leads us to believe a plant can reach 0 emissions of mercury ‐ this is a legal issue and we may need

to discuss a bit tomorrow as well.

Since I was not at the OMB/OAR meeting, I'm not sure if this is the language revisions that were agreed

upon.  However it is a good starting place for discussions tomorrow.

THANKS.

(See attached file: Draft MCA request for comments_Aug 30.doc)

Sharon V. Nizich

Metals and Minerals Group

Sector Policies and Programs Division

OAQPS ‐ US EPA

RTP NC 27711

919/541‐2825
# C_2023291EN.01000501.xml

| 18.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 291/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 291/5

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.103404

(2023/C 291/04)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 7.7.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.103404 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region | NIEDERSACHSEN |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Niedersachsen: Gewährung von Ausgleichszahlungen gemäß § 59 Abs. 2 Satz 1 des Niedersächsischen Wassergesetzes (NWG) i.V.m. § § 52 Abs. 5 des Wasserhaushaltsgesetzes (WHG) und § 93 NWG |
| Legal basis | (Anlage 2) § § 58, 59 Niedersächsisches Wassergesetz (NWG) i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 5 Wasserhaushaltsgesetz (WHG) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas, Aid for disadvantages related to Natura 2000 areas and to the Water Framework Directive |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 75 000 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 15 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | 100,0  % |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2027 |
| Economic sectors | Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Landwirtschaftskammer Niedersachsen — Geschäftsbereich Förderung - |
| Wunstorfer Landstraße 9, D-30453 Hannover |

Date of adoption of the decision

7.7.2023

Aid number

SA.103404

Member State

Germany

Region

NIEDERSACHSEN

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Niedersachsen: Gewährung von Ausgleichszahlungen gemäß § 59 Abs. 2 Satz 1 des Niedersächsischen Wassergesetzes (NWG) i.V.m. § § 52 Abs. 5 des Wasserhaushaltsgesetzes (WHG) und § 93 NWG

Legal basis

(Anlage 2) § § 58, 59 Niedersächsisches Wassergesetz (NWG) i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 5 Wasserhaushaltsgesetz (WHG)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas, Aid for disadvantages related to Natura 2000 areas and to the Water Framework Directive

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 75 000 000 EUR

Annual budget: 15 000 000 EUR

Intensity

100,0  %

Duration

Until 31.12.2027

Economic sectors

Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Landwirtschaftskammer Niedersachsen — Geschäftsbereich Förderung -

Wunstorfer Landstraße 9, D-30453 Hannover

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 1 (Friday, January 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 99]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30358]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public that a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Procedures 
Advisory Committee (ATPAC) will be held to review present air traffic 
control procedures and practices for standardization, revision, 
clarification, and upgrading of terminology and procedures.

DATES: The meeting will be held Monday, February 9 from 12:00 p.m. to 
5:00 p.m. and Tuesday, February 10, 2015 from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at CGH Technologies, Inc., 600 
Maryland Ave. SW., Suite 800W, Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Heather Hemdal, ATPAC Executive 
Director, 600 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20597.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App.2), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the ATPAC to be held Monday, February 9 
from 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. and Tuesday, February 10, 2015 from 8:30 
a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    The agenda for this meeting will cover a continuation of the 
ATPAC's review of present air traffic control procedures and practices 
for standardization, revision, clarification, and upgrading of 
terminology and procedures. It will also include:

1. Call for Safety Items
2. Approval of minutes of the previous meeting
3. Introduction of New Areas of Concern or Miscellaneous items
4. Items of Interest
5. Status updates to existing Areas of Concern
6. Discussion and agreement of location and dates for subsequent 
meetings.

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
available. With the approval of the Chairperson, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons desiring to attend 
and persons desiring to present oral statement should notify Ms. 
Heather Hemdal no later than February 2, 2015. Any member of the public 
may present a written statement to the ATPAC at any time at the address 
given above.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 22, 2014.
Heather Hemdal,
Executive Director, Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2014-30358 Filed 12-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2928 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2928

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 201 B Street in Perryville, Arkansas, as the ``Harold George Bennett 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2015

  Mr. Hill (for himself, Mr. Womack, Mr. Crawford, and Mr. Westerman) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 201 B Street in Perryville, Arkansas, as the ``Harold George Bennett 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HAROLD GEORGE BENNETT POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 201 B Street in Perryville, Arkansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Harold George Bennett Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Harold 
George Bennett Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
701 A.2d 91

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Sigismund John Albert WYSOLMERSKI.

Misc. Docket (Subtitle AG), No. 53

Sept. Term, 1997.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Oct. 8, 1997.

*ORDER*

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Sigismund John Albert Wysolmerski, to suspend the Respondent from the practice of law for three (3) years.

The Court, having considered the Petition, it is this 8th day of October, 1997,

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Sigismund John Albert Wysolmerski, be and he is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for a period of three (3) years, effective immediately, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Respondent’s Petition for Reinstatement in the State of Maryland shall be conditioned on Respondent’s prior reinstatement to the practice of law in Vermont, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Sigismund John Albert Wysolmerski from the register of attorneys in this Court, and certify that fact to the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-713.
# Official Journal C 78A/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 78A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5011 April 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 78A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5011 April 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 078A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — second supplement to the 25th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 078A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — second supplement to the 25th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### CURFMAN v. JEFFERSON STANDARD LIFE INS. CO.

No. 12803.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.

March 4, 1939.

Wade & Wade, of Rockwall, for appellant.

Malone, Lipscomb, White & Seay, of Dallas, and Carl Miller, of Rockwall, for appellee.

BOND, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order granting a temporary injunction, restraining appellant from filing and prosecuting in a justice court a multiplicity of suits involving the same • question, and growing out of the same contract of insurance, as in the case of Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co. v. Donald J. Curfman, 127 S.W.2d 567, this day decided by this court, until the cited cause has been definitely determined by the appellate courts. This suit is founded in equity. While there is no fixed rule for determining what is an en-joinable multiplicity of suits, the decisions are uniform that such actions rest in the sound discretion of the court granting the writ.

The temporary injunction here granted was clearly correct, in order: (1) to prevent a multiplicity of suits—all growing out of the same alleged wrongful act and involving cognate questions of fact and of law and based on the same contract as that involved in the suit on appeal; (2) to prevent a possible instrument of injustice; and (3) to prevent vexing and harassing litigations. Standard Inv. Co. v. J. V. Dowdy, Tex.Civ.App., 122 S.W.2d 1107. The injunction will toll the statute of limitation on all threatened suits not *746filed, should the cited cause he not determined within the limitation period fixed by law for debts growing out of.written contract, and, certainly, appellant loses nothing by the delay, and the injunction will not prejudice his rights in any manner.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.