alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2966 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 497
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2966

                          [Report No. 114-645]

To amend the purposes of TANF to include reducing poverty by increasing 
             employment entry, retention, and advancement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2015

   Mr. Smith of Missouri (for himself and Mrs. Noem) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

                             June 28, 2016

                      Additional sponsor: Mr. Reed

                             June 28, 2016

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on July 8, 
                                 2015]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the purposes of TANF to include reducing poverty by increasing 
             employment entry, retention, and advancement.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reducing Poverty through Employment 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSES OF THE TANF PROGRAM TO INCLUDE REDUCING POVERTY 
              THROUGH WORK.

    Section 401(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 601(a)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (3);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (4) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) reduce child poverty by increasing employment entry, 
        retention, and advancement of needy parents.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall take effect on October 1, 
2016.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 497

114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2966

                          [Report No. 114-645]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend the purposes of TANF to include reducing poverty by increasing 
             employment entry, retention, and advancement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 28, 2016

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```
## U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it
No. 07-1588 ALEXANDRE ARONOV, Plaintiff, Appellee,

v . JANET NAPOLITANO, ET AL., Defendants, Appellants.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on April 13, 2009 is amended as follows: On p. 35, line 13 of footnote 3: Replace "parties" with "parties'".
Swanson, Brian (OST) DCT^g>$r-^^^^~<g^^^^ 

From: Devany, Dennis (OST) ; '•': (ME/Vf 0'-

Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 3:55 PM '::/-.n-r,-,V' 

To: Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Subject: FW: Answer to Pacific Wings' Petition for Reconsideration 

i--3 0 

From: Cheney-Ann Lima rmailto:calima(ahawaii.edu] 

Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 3:54 PM 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Subject: Answer to Pacific Wings' Petition for Reconsideration 

To: Whom it may concern, 

I am writing this letter in opposition of Pacific Wings' petition for reconsideration. As a 

student intern here at Kalaupapa, Pacific Wings flights were EXTREMELY unaffordable 

and unnecessary. Not only were Pacific Wings's prices ridiculous, but they were also very 

unreliable. The community here, as well as some Moloka'i members are much more 

comfortable with the termination of services here. 

Mahalo nui, 

Cheney Lima
#### BAZAR v. STATE.

No. 19567.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 3, 1938.

Aubrey H. Fielder, of Lockhart, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is sodomy; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for ten years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. No error has been perceived or pointed out.

The judgment i-s affirmed.
# C_2023315EN.01000101.xml

| 5.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10855 – CAPGEMINI / ORANGE / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 315/01)

On 12 June 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M10855. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M10855. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
[Cite as State v. Cox , 2019-Ohio-1399.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

CLERMONT COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2018-05-026

: D E C I S I O N - vs - 4/15/2019 : EUGENE E. COX, : Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM CLERMONT COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. 2018 CR 00019

D. Vincent Faris, Clermont County Prosecuting Attorney, Nicholas Horton, 76 South Riverside Drive, 2nd Floor, Batavia, Ohio 45103, for appellee W. Stephen Haynes, Clermont County Public Defender, Robert F. Benintendi, 302 East Main Street, Batavia, Ohio 45103, for appellant Eugene E. Cox, #A-743489, Madison Correctional Institution, 1851 State Route 56, London, Ohio 43140, appellant, pro se

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by appellant Eugene E. Cox, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Clermont County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel and appellant's pro se brief. {¶ 2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.______________________

- 2 - California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional righ ts; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶ 3} Appellant has filed a pro se brief raising one assignment of error pertaining

to the 30-month sentence he received. {¶ 4} We have accordingly examined the record, the potential assignment of error presented in counsel's brie f, and the assignment of error in appellant's pro se brief, and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the pr oceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

HENDRICKSON, P.J., RINGLAND and PIPER, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40448

Summary Calendar

 

ALFRED L. WILSON

Petitioner - Appellant

v.

WARDEN U.S. PENITENTIARY BEAUMONT; US PAROLE COMMISSION

Respondents - Appellees

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:99-CV-193

--------------------

November 12, 2001

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and BENAVIDES, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alfred L. Wilson, federal prisoner # 98870-131, appeals the

denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he challenged

the revocation of his parole. He first avers that he was denied

his due process right to personally confront the victim during

her testimony at the parole-revocation hearing. 

Although Wilson was not allowed to remain in the room during

the victim’s testimony at the revocation hearing, his attorney

was present, and he was given the opportunity to cross-examine
No. 01-40448

-2-

the victim. Accordingly, Wilson was afforded the minimum

procedural due process requirements. See Morrissey v. Brewer,

408 U.S. 471, 489 (1972).

We also reject Wilson’s challenge to the sufficiency of the

evidence. A review of the record reveals that the Parole

Commission had “some evidence” from which to conclude that Wilson

was guilty of the offense of rape, including the police

investigation file and the testimony of Wilson, the victim,

Wilson’s parole officer, the police investigator, and the

victim’s mother and grandfather. See Villarreal v. United States

Parole Comm’n, 985 F.2d 835, 839 (5th Cir. 1993). The judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION

I, Ian Foreman, certify that;

(1)         I have reviewed this report on Form10-QSB for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2007 of Mar Ked Mineral Exploration, Inc.;

(2)         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)         The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)         disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)         The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)         all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  

Date:  October 15, 2007
*"Ian Foreman"*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 1068

### CFR Correction

This rule is being published by the Office of the Federal Register to correct an editorial or technical error that appeared in the most recent annual revision of the Code of Federal Regulations.

In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1060 to End, revised as of July 1, 2024, amend § 1068.250 by reinstating paragraph (i) to read as follows:

§ 1068.250

* * * * *

(i) We may include reasonable requirements on an approval granted under this section, including provisions to recover or otherwise address the lost environmental benefit. For example, we may require that you meet a less stringent emission standard or buy and use available emission credits.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2024-21640 Filed 9-19-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 0099-10-P
# C_2023018EN.01000401.xml

| 19.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 18/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 18/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10754 – ONE ROCK CAPITAL PARTNERS / PREFERE RESINS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 18/02)

On 7 July 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10754. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10754. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NOS. WR-90, 850-01, WR- 90,850-02, WR-90,850- 03, & WR-90,850- 04

EX P ARTE BYRON EARL BUSH , Appli cant

ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. 14-19647-A, 14-19648- A, 07-01499-A , & 07-01730- A IN THE 252 DISTRICT COURT FROM JEFF ERSON COUNTY N D

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of two counts of attempted murder and t wo counts of poss ession of a controlled substance. He was sentenc ed to forty y ear s’ imprisonment in eac h cause . The Thirteenth Court of Appea ls a ffirme d his c onvictions. Bush v. State , Nos. 13-17-00389- CR & 13- 17-390 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi-Edinburg Aug

. 23, 2018) and Bush v. State , No. 13-17-00386- CR & 13-17-00387- CR (Tex. A p p . — Co r p u s Chr isti-Edinburg Aug

. 23, 2018). Applicant filed these applications for writs of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded them to this C ourt. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that appellate counsel was ineffe ctive by failing to raise various claims

on direc t appea l. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to re l i ef

. Smith v.2

Robbins , 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Ex parte Miller , 330 S

. W

. 3 d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order appellate counsel to respond to A

pplicant’s claims. I n developing the rec ord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I t appea rs that Applicant is repr esente d by counsel. I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter mine if Applicant is repr esente d by counse l, and if not, whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant at the hear ing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as t o wh et h er appellate counsel’s perf

ormanc e was defic ient and Applicant was prejudice d. The trial court may make any other finding s and conc lusions that it deems a ppropriate in response to Applica nt’s claims. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions o f law withi n ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motio n s, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: April 1, 2020 Do not publish
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 4, 2021

No. 04-20-00359-CV

Brandon HJELLA,

Appellant

v.

RED MCCOMBS MOTORS, LTD,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI15792

Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee's Motion for Extension of Time to file Brief is hereby GRANTED. 

Appellee's Brief is due April 5, 2021.

It is so ORDERED on March 4, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
# C_2023120EN.01001101.xml

| 3.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/11

---

Corrigendum to Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 391 of 12 October 2022
  )

(2023/C 120/10)

On page 54, in the part on ‘Single document’, in point 8, first paragraph, first sentence:

for:

‘Thanks to the favourable climate conditions characteristic of the vineyards of Alsace, the protected designation of origin “Alsace grand cru Eichbert” benefits from one of the best locations.’,

read:

‘Thanks to the favourable climate conditions characteristic of the vineyards of Alsace, the protected designation of origin “Alsace grand cru Eichberg” benefits from one of the best locations.’.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________

)

OCEANA, INC., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) 

v. )

) 

WILBUR L. ROSS, United States )

Secretary of Commerce, et al., ) Civil Action No. 08-1881 (PLF)

) 

Defendants, )

)

and )

)

FISHERIES-SURVIVAL FUND, )

)

Defendant-Intervenor. )

____________________________________)

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the opinion issued this same day, it is hereby 

ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED WITHOUT VACATUR to the 

National Marine Fisheries Service for the limited purpose outlined in the accompanying opinion; 

it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer in order to propose 

a schedule by which the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) will address the 

deficiencies identified in the accompanying opinion. On or before October 30, 2020, the parties 

shall file a joint status report informing the Court whether they have reached agreement on a 

proposed schedule. If the parties are not in agreement, they shall inform the Court of their 

respective positions; and it is
2 

FURTHER ORDERED that the NMFS shall file status reports updating the Court 

on its formal consultation progress every sixty days. 

SO ORDERED.

_____________________ 

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge

DATE: October 1, 2020 

/s/