alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023109EN.01008101.xml

| 24.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/81 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/81

---

Corrigendum to Statement of the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No .../2023 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Kosovo *)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 105 of 21 March 2023
  )

(2023/C 109/07)

On the cover, in the table of contents, and on page 8, the title should read:

‘Statement of the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 1/2023 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Kosovo *)’

---
Opinion filed September 26, 2013

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-13-00035-CV

__________

M&M ELEVATOR COMPANY, LTD., Appellant

V.

ELIAZAR TREVINO, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT 

FRIEND OF ELIAZAR TREVINO, III, LAILYANA TREVINO, 

AND URIJAH TREVINO, Appellee

On Appeal from the 244th District Court

Ector County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C-128,532

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

M&M Elevator Company, Ltd., is the appellant in this appeal. It has filed an 

unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). In 

the motion, Appellant states, “The parties have reached an agreement to settle and
2

compromise the issues between them.” Appellant asks this court to dismiss the 

appeal. Therefore, in accordance with Appellant’s request, we dismiss the appeal. 

The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

September 26, 2013

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

HOMER A. STILLWELL, III; ELIZABETH

ROBERTSON, MARGUERITE H.

BENSON, ADAM LEIGHTON, III, AND

BLACK MOUNTAIN OPERATING, LLC

,

Appellant s

,

v.

JOHN F. STEVENSON, BORDEN W.

STEVENSON, JOAN PIRIE LECLERC,

JOHN T. PIRIE, SOPHIE H. PIRIE, BLAKE

OIL AND GAS CORPORATION, MDJ

MINERALS, L.L.P., WADE P. KOEHL,

AND AOG PERMIAN PARTNERS, LTD.

,

Appellee s

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 21

- 00131

- CV

Appeal from the

143rd Judicial District Court

of Reeves County, Texas

(TC# 21

- 06

- 24028

- CVR )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and reman d the cause for further

proceeding consistent with this Court’s opinion. We further order that Appellants recover from

Appellees all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21309]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 296 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-616, CP2024-624.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21309 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kitcher Resources Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Raminder Badyal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
11th day of December, 2007.


/s/ Raminder Badyal
-----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6506

JUSEL NORTHINGTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH P. SACCHET; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA97-1220-CCB)

Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 25, 1999

Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jusel Northington, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jusel Northington seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Northington v. Sacchet, No. CA-97-1220-

CCB (D. Md. Mar. 30, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I,Edileen Salicrup, Chief Financial Officer of ClearComm, L.P., certify that:

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report of ClearComm, L.P.;

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)           Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

# (b)           Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: August 14, 2006 |   |                    |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                  |   |                    |
|                  |   | /s/ Edileen Salicrup    |
|                  |   | Edileen Salicrup        |
|                  |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3103 

To encourage spectrum licensees to make unused spectrum available for 

use by rural and smaller carriers in order to expand wireless coverage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2015 

Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois (for himself and Mr. LOEBSACK) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To encourage spectrum licensees to make unused spectrum 

available for use by rural and smaller carriers in order 

to expand wireless coverage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Spectrum Acces5 sibility Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF LICENSES. 

7 Section 307 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 

8 U.S.C. 307) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(g) EXTENSION OF LICENSES.— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3103 IH

1 ‘‘(1) DEFINITIONS.— 

2 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this 

3 subsection— 

4 ‘‘(i) the term ‘rural area’ means any 

5 area other than— 

6 ‘‘(I) an area described in clause 

7 (i) or (ii) of section 343(a)(13)(A) of 

8 the Consolidated Farm and Rural De9 velopment Act (7 U.S.C. 

10 1991(a)(13)(A)); and 

11 ‘‘(II) a city, town, or incor12 porated area that has a population of 

13 greater than 20,000 inhabitants; and 

14 ‘‘(ii) the term ‘small carrier’ means a 

15 carrier with not more than 1,500 employ16 ees. 

17 ‘‘(B) CALCULATION OF NUMBER OF EM18 PLOYEES.—For purposes of subparagraph 

19 (A)(ii), the number of employees of a carrier 

20 shall be determined in accordance with section 

21 121.106 of title 13, Code of Federal Regula22 tions, or any successor thereto. 

23 ‘‘(2) ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM.—Not later 

24 than 90 days after the date of enactment of the 

25 Rural Spectrum Accessibility Act of 2015, the ComVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:03 Jul 21, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3103.IH H3103

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3103 IH

1 mission shall establish a program under which a car2 rier that receives a license under this section may 

3 partition or disaggregate the license in order to 

4 make unused spectrum available to small carriers or 

5 carriers to serve rural areas. 

6 ‘‘(3) EXTENSION OF LICENSE TERM.—Any car7 rier that receives a license under this section and 

8 participates in the program established under para9 graph (2) shall receive a 3-year extension of the li10 cense granted under this section.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2801 

To prohibit the Administrator of General Services from leasing space for 

certain purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2015 

Mr. BABIN (for himself, Mr. BARLETTA, and Mr. RATCLIFFE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Administrator of General Services from 

leasing space for certain purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Office Space for 

5 Executive Amnesty Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON GSA LEASING AUTHORITY. 

7 No funds may be obligated or expended by the Ad8 ministrator of General Services to lease any space for pur9 poses of carrying out the policies set forth in the following: 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2801 IH

1 (1) The memorandum from the Secretary of 

2 Homeland Security entitled ‘‘Southern Border and 

3 Approaches Campaign’’ dated November 20, 2014. 

4 (2) The memorandum from the Secretary of 

5 Homeland Security entitled ‘‘Policies for the Appre6 hension, Detention and Removal of Undocumented 

7 Immigrants’’ dated November 20, 2014. 

8 (3) The memorandum from the Secretary of 

9 Homeland Security entitled ‘‘Secure Communities’’ 

10 dated November 20, 2014. 

11 (4) The memorandum from the Secretary of 

12 Homeland Security entitled ‘‘Exercising Prosecu13 torial Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who 

14 Came to the United States as Children and with Re15 spect to Certain Individuals Who Are the Parents of 

16 U.S. Citizens or Permanent Residents’’ dated No17 vember 20, 2014. 

18 (5) The memorandum from the Secretary of 

19 Homeland Security entitled ‘‘Expansion of the Pro20 visional Waiver Program’’ dated November 20, 

21 2014. 

22 (6) The memorandum from the Secretary of 

23 Homeland Security entitled ‘‘Policies Supporting 

24 U.S. High-Skilled Businesses and Workers’’ dated 

25 November 20, 2014. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2801 IH

1 (7) The memorandum from the Secretary of 

2 Homeland Security entitled ‘‘Families of U.S. 

3 Armed Forces Members and Enlistees’’ dated No4 vember 20, 2014. 

5 (8) The memorandum from the Secretary of 

6 Homeland Security entitled ‘‘Directive to Provide 

7 Consistency Regarding Advance Parole’’ dated No8 vember 20, 2014. 

9 (9) The memorandum from the Secretary of 

10 Homeland Security entitled ‘‘Policies to Promote 

11 and Increase Access to U.S. Citizenship’’ dated No12 vember 20, 2014. 

13 (10) The memoranda issued by the President 

14 on November 21, 2014, including— 

15 (A) the memorandum entitled ‘‘Creating 

16 Welcoming Communities and Fully Integrating 

17 Immigrants and Refugees’’; and 

18 (B) the memorandum entitled ‘‘Modern19 izing and Streamlining the U.S. Immigrant 

20 Visa System for the 21st Century’’. 

21 (11) Any similar memorandum issued after No22 vember 21, 2014. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-11902-GAO

RICHARD MARTIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

MCDONALD’S CORPORATION,

Defendant.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-12328-GAO

RICHARD MARTIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CORE SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Defendant. 

ORDER

April 20, 2016

O’TOOLE, D.J.

In these two related actions, Richard Martin claims that while he was standing in the lobby 

of a McDonald’s restaurant in Washington, D.C., Deandre A. Harris, a special police officer 

employed by Core Security Solutions, Inc., harassed him, ordered him to leave the restaurant, 

assaulted him despite his compliance with Harris’s directive, and transferred him to the custody of 

the local police department which falsely charged him with assaulting a police officer and kept 

him in custody overnight.1

 1 Martin’s related suit against Harris was dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution. 

Martin v. Harris, C.A. 15-12329-GAO (D. Mass. Mar. 22, 2016), ECF #20. 
2

By separate motions, McDonald’s and Core Security Solutions argue that Massachusetts 

is not the proper venue for these actions. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391. The Court agrees. The events 

giving rise to Martin’s claims occurred exclusively in Washington, D.C. Core Security Solutions 

appears to be a resident of Maryland, just outside of Washington, D.C., and appears to have no 

presence within this District. Furthermore, although Martin lives in Massachusetts, the remaining 

relevant witnesses, such as employees and patrons of McDonald’s and members of the Metro 

Police Department, are likely to live in the Washington, D.C. area. Similarly, any relevant 

documents are likely to be located there.

Consequently, the defendants’ motions, insofar as they request a transfer of venue, are 

GRANTED, and the cases are TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District 

of Columbia. See id. § 1406(a). 

It is SO ORDERED.

/s/ George A. O’Toole, Jr.

United States District Judge
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2023068EN.01002701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 24.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/27 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11035 – STENA / MIDSONA)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 68/08)

1.

On 16 February 2023, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2023068EN.01002701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Stena Adactum AB (‘Stena’, Sweden), controlled by Stena AB Group, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Midsona AB (‘Midsona’, Sweden), listed on Nasdaq Stcokholm. |

Stena will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control over Midsona.

The concentration is accomplished by way of subscription of new shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Stena is an investment company active within various areas and with long-term investment horizon, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Midsona develops, produces and markets health food products, self-care products and hygiene products and markets then through several different sales channels, including grocery stores, pharmacies, specialized health stores, gyms as well as online. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2023068EN.01002701-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11035 – STENA / MIDSONA

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2023068EN.01002701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2023068EN.01002701-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
IB 

Union Calendar No. 258 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3032 

[Report No. 114–337] 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to repeal a certain reporting 

requirement of the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2015 

Ms. SINEMA (for herself and Mr. HURT of Virginia) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

NOVEMBER 16, 2015 

Additional sponsor: Mr. KILDEE

NOVEMBER 16, 2015 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3032 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to repeal 

a certain reporting requirement of the Securities and 

Exchange Commission. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3032 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securities and Ex5 change Commission Reporting Modernization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENT. 

7 Paragraph (6) of section 21(h) of the Securities Ex8 change Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78u(h)) is repealed. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 258 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3032 

[Report No. 114–337] 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to 

curities and Exchange Commission. repeal a certain reporting requirement of the SeNOVEMBER 16, 2015 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS