alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### MAY 4 2001 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

JAMES MICHAEL STUART, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. No. 00-7121 DELANA GOSS, Sheriff; DAN GARBER; CLINT CARPENTER; HEATH CLINTON; CHRIS BOLES; BRIAN CATCHER; JEFF PHILLIPS; CHAD McCARTER; CLAY BUCKNER; PAUL UNKNOWN, a/k/a Richard Paul Horlick; JACK SMITHSON, Defendants-Appellees. (D.C. No. 99-CV-121-B) (E.D.Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before HENRY , BRISCOE and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of2

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). T he case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff James Michael Stuart, a state prisoner ap pearing pro se, appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1 983 civil rights action as frivolous. We conclude the appeal is frivolous and dismiss pu rsuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). Stuart filed his § 1983 civil rights action on Marc h 18, 1999. He alleged that (1) he was denied adequate medical treatment; (2) he was denied visitations and the right to send or receive mail; and (3) his mail was delivered to him opened and access to his attorney was denied. On S eptember 29, 2000, the district court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissed the action as frivolous. We review a district court's dismissal of a complai nt as frivolous for an abuse of discretion. See Schlicher v. Thomas , 111 F.3d 777, 779 (10th Cir. 1997). The district court did not abuse its discretion i n dismissing Stuart's complaint as frivolous. The court carefully consid ered each of Stuart's claims and found that Stuart's complaint was without merit “inthat it lack[ed] an arguable basis either in law or fact,” citing Nietzke v. Williams , 490 U.S. 319 (1989), and Yellen v. Cooper , 828 F.2d 1471 (10th Cir. 1987). Order at 7. The appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. Stuart is re minded that he remains3

obligated to continue making partial payments of th e appellate filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). The mandate shall issue fo rthwith. Entered for the Court Mary Beck Briscoe Circuit Judge
[No. 44705-0-I.

Division One.

October 23, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Eric McCauley, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-1-05337-9, Harriett M. Cody, J., entered May 12, 2000. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
# C_2022130EN.01001701.xml

| 23.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/17

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA Relevance)

(2022/C 130/15)

| Member State | Spain |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned route | Almeria – Seville |
| Period of validity of the contract | 2 years following the start of the operations, plus two additional years (2) if extension needed |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | Not before 2 months following the date of publication of this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Ministerio de Transportes, Movilidad y Agenda Urbana |
| Dirección General de Aviación Civil |
| Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo |
| Paseo de la Castellana 67 |
| 28071 Madrid |
| España |

Member State

Spain

Concerned route

Almeria – Seville

Period of validity of the contract

2 years following the start of the operations, plus two additional years (2) if extension needed

Deadline for submission of tenders

Not before 2 months following the date of publication of this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Ministerio de Transportes, Movilidad y Agenda Urbana

Dirección General de Aviación Civil

Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo

Paseo de la Castellana 67

28071 Madrid

España

E-mail: osp.dgac@mitma.es

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3029 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3029

To require the Office of Personnel Management to provide complimentary, 
  comprehensive identity protection coverage to all individuals whose 
personally identifiable information was compromised during recent data 
                     breaches at Federal agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 10, 2015

 Ms. Norton (for herself, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Beyer, Ms. Edwards, Mr. 
Ruppersberger, Mr. Connolly, and Mr. Cummings) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Office of Personnel Management to provide complimentary, 
  comprehensive identity protection coverage to all individuals whose 
personally identifiable information was compromised during recent data 
                     breaches at Federal agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reducing the Effects of the 
Cyberattack on OPM Victims Emergency Response Act of 2015'' or the 
``RECOVER Act''.

SEC. 2. IDENTITY PROTECTION COVERAGE FOR INDIVIDUALS AFFECTED BY 
              FEDERAL AGENCY DATA BREACHES.

    (a) Definition.--In this section, the term ``affected individual'' 
means any individual whose personally identifiable information was 
compromised during--
            (1) the data breach of personnel records of current and 
        former Federal employees, at a network maintained by the 
        Department of the Interior, that was announced by the Office of 
        Personnel Management on June 4, 2015; or
            (2) the data breach of systems of the Office of Personnel 
        Management containing information related to the background 
        investigations of current, former, and prospective Federal 
        employees, and of other individuals.
    (b) Identity Protection Coverage.--The Office of Personnel 
Management shall provide to each affected individual complimentary 
identity protection coverage that--
            (1) is not less comprehensive than the complimentary 
        identity protection coverage that the Office provided to 
        affected individuals before the date of enactment of this Act;
            (2) is effective for the remainder of the life of the 
        individual; and
            (3) includes not less than $5,000,000 in identity theft 
        insurance.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1





              CONSENT OF PERSONS ABOUT TO BECOME DIRECTORS



                Pursuant to Rule 438 under the Securities Act of
      1933, as amended, the undersigned hereby consents to being
      named in the Current Report on Form 8-K of Aetna Services,
      Inc., formerly Aetna Life and Casualty Company, dated April
      1, 1996 and incorporated by reference in Aetna Inc.'s 
      Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos.  333-
      08429, 333-08431 and 333-08427).



      Blue Bell, Pennsylvania


      Sept. 13, 1996



                                          /s/ Leonard Abramson
                                          ____________________
                                              Leonard Abramson
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

December 4, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00861

- CR & 04

- 18

- 00862

- CR

Juan ORTIZ, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County , Texas Trial Court No. 2017CR7171

, 2018CR0457 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

In the interest of the efficient administration of the court = s docket, we ORDER Appeal Nos. 04

- 18

- 00861

- CR and 04

- 18

- 00862

- CR consolidated. The parties must file motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals were one but put both appeal numbers in the style of the case. However, a record must be filed in each appeal, the record in each case will remain separate and, if supplementation of the record becomes necessary, the supplemental material must be filed in the appeal to which it applies. The cases must be argued together in one brief, as in a single appeal, and if oral argument is requested and granted, the entire case must be argu ed as a single appeal, with the total time limit for each party equal to the ordinary time limit for a party in a single appeal. The court will dispose of both appeals in the same judgment, opinion, and mandate.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel, the district clerk, and all court reporters.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 4th day of December, 2018

.___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 

Standard Operating Permit Condition VI – Good Air Pollution 

Control Practices

Permit Condition for Air Quality Permits 

Adopted by Reference in 18 AAC 50.346 

April 1, 2002 

REVISED August 25, 2004
Standard Operating Permit Condition VI – 1 April 1, 2002 

Good Air Pollution Control Practices 

Revised August 25, 2004

Standard Operating Permit Condition VI – Good Air Pollution 

Control Practices 

Emission Unit [SOURCE] Categories This Condition Applies to: All emission units

[SOURCES] that are not insignificant or that use a control device, except that standard permit 

condition VI does not apply 

1. to any emission unit [SOURCE] subject to an emission standard in 40 C.F.R. 60, 40 C.F.R. 

61, or 40 C.F.R. 63; or 

2. if, for each emissions standard that applies, there is continuous emissions monitoring or the 

permit writer finds that continuous parametric monitoring or frequency of other periodic 

monitoring is sufficient that equipment performance affecting emissions will not deteriorate 

between monitoring events. 

The department will use standard permit condition VI in any operating permit unless the 

department determines that emission unit [SOURCE] or stationary source [FACILITY]specific 

conditions more adequately meet the requirements of 18 AAC 50. 

Permit Wording: 

1. Good Air Pollution Control Practice. 

1.1 The permittee shall do the following for emission units [SOURCES] <identify 

emission units [SOURCES]>: 

a. perform regular maintenance considering the manufacturer’s or the operator’s 

maintenance procedures; 

b. keep records of any maintenance that would have a significant effect on 

emissions; the records may be kept in electronic format; 

c. keep a copy of either the manufacturer’s or the operator’s maintenance 

procedures. 

The following applies to this standard permit condition: 

1. Condition VI.1.1 will 

- list all emission units [SOURCES] with a control device ; and 

- for emission units [SOURCES] without a control device, list only those emission 

units [SOURCES] that are not insignificant under 18 AAC 50.326(d) - (i).
# C_2023117EN.01000301.xml

| 31.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/3

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.64373

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 117/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 13.10.2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.64373 |
| Member State | France |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aide à un projet de développement d’un service de fret ferroviaire entre Perpignan et l’Ile de France composé d’une liaison conventionnelle entre Perpignan et Rungis et d’une liaison en transport combiné entre Le Boulou et Gennevilliers. |
| Legal basis | Article 178 de la loi no 2019-1428 du 24 décembre 2019 d'orientation des mobilités; loi no 2020-1721 du 29 décembre 2020 de finances pour 2021 |
| Type of measure | Ad Hoc Case
  RAIL4LOGISTICS |
| Objective | Coordination of transport, Coordination of transport |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 11 238 483 EUR
  Annual budget: 2 809 621 EUR |
| Intensity | 0,0  % |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2025 |
| Economic sectors | Freight rail transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministère de la transition écologique et solidaire (MTES) — Direction Générale des Infrastructures de Transport et de la Mer |
| Tour Sequoia, 1 place Carpeaux, 92555 La Défense |

Date of adoption of the decision

13.10.2022

Aid number

SA.64373

Member State

France

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aide à un projet de développement d’un service de fret ferroviaire entre Perpignan et l’Ile de France composé d’une liaison conventionnelle entre Perpignan et Rungis et d’une liaison en transport combiné entre Le Boulou et Gennevilliers.

Legal basis

Article 178 de la loi no 2019-1428 du 24 décembre 2019 d'orientation des mobilités; loi no 2020-1721 du 29 décembre 2020 de finances pour 2021

Type of measure

Ad Hoc Case

RAIL4LOGISTICS

Objective

Coordination of transport, Coordination of transport

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 11 238 483 EUR

Annual budget: 2 809 621 EUR

Intensity

0,0  %

Duration

Until 31.12.2025

Economic sectors

Freight rail transport

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministère de la transition écologique et solidaire (MTES) — Direction Générale des Infrastructures de Transport et de la Mer

Tour Sequoia, 1 place Carpeaux, 92555 La Défense

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77864-77865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22010]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 1:06 p.m. on Friday, September 20, 2024.

PLACE: The meeting was held in the Board Room located on the sixth 
floor of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street, NW, Washington, 
DC.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation met to consider matters related to the 
Corporation's corporate activities. In calling the meeting, the Board 
determined, on motion of Director Rohit Chopra (Director, Consumer 
Financial Protection Bureau), seconded by Director Michael J. Hsu 
(Acting Comptroller of the Currency), by the unanimous vote of Chairman 
Martin J. Gruenberg, Vice Chairman Travis Hill, Director Jonathan 
McKernan, Director Michael J. Hsu (Acting Comptroller of the Currency), 
and Director Rohit Chopra (Director, Consumer Financial Protection 
Bureau), that Corporation business required its consideration of the 
matters which were to be the subject of this meeting on less than seven 
days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was 
practicable;

[[Page 77865]]

that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters 
in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be 
considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2) and 
(c)(6), of the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(2) 
and(c)(6)).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Requests for further information 
concerning the meeting may be directed to Debra A. Decker, Executive 
Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.

    Dated this the 20th day of September, 2024.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-22010 Filed 9-20-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
# CI2022016EN.01000101.xml

| 13.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 16/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 16/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/1720, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/24, and in Council Regulation (EU) 2019/1716, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/22 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Nicaragua

(2022/C 16 I/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/1720 (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/24 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) 2019/1716 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/22 (4) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Nicaragua.

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Decision (CFSP) 2019/1720 and Regulation (EU) 2019/1716. The grounds for the listing of the persons concerned appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2019/1716 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Nicaragua, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments.

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, before 1 July 2022, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 9 of Decision (CFSP) 2019/1720 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Nicaragua.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 262, 15.10.2019, p. 58.

(2)  OJ L 5 I, 10.1.2021, p. 13.

(3)  OJ L 262, 15.10.2019, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 5 I, 10.1.2021, p. 4.

---
#### TEXAS EMPLOYERS INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mrs. J.W. IRBY et al., Defendants in Error.

No. 1945—6569.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.

Feb. 26, 1936.

T. R. Boone, of Wichita Falls, and Lawther, Cox & Cramer and Wm. M. Cramer, all of Dallas, for plaintiff in error.

Grindstaff, Zellers & Hutcheson, of Weatherford, Weeks, Morrow, Francis & Hankerson, of Wichita Falls, and B. W. Tipton, of Electra, for defendants in error.

HICKMAN, Commissioner.

This is a companion case to the cases of Texas Employers Insurance Association v. Mrs. Maranda Russell et al., 91 S.W. (2d) 317, and Texas Employers Insurance Association v. Maurice Snyder et al., 91 S.W. (2d) 320, this day decided. The defendants in error are the beneficiaries under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 8306 et seq.) of J. W. Kenworthy, who lost his life in the same explosion that took the lives of J. B. Russell and J. H. Snyder. In this case, as in the Snyder Case, the trial court sustained a general demurrer to the petition of the claimants. For the reasons assigned in the opinions in the companion cases, we order that the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals be reversed and that of the trial court be affirmed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR BILLING CONCEPTS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          26,773
<SECURITIES>                                         4
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,418
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,630
<PP&E>                                          21,487 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,073
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 169,783
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,490
<BONDS>                                          6,762
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           329
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   169,783
<SALES>                                          1,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,547
<CGS>                                            1,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 402
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,578
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,652 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,074)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,074)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.06)
        

</TABLE>