alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7500

ROBERT LEE BROCK, a/k/a Two Souls Walker,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

REBECCA SMITH, Honorable Judge,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-95-799-2)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Brock v. Smith, No. CA-95-799-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 20, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2022362EN.01004001.xml

| 21.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/40

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10847 – NBH / NLMK DANSTEEL)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 362/05)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | NLMK Belgium Holdings SA (‘NBH’, Belgium), jointly controlled by Société Wallonne de Gestion et des Participations SA (‘Sogepa’, Belgium) and NLMK International B.V., which in turn is ultimately controlled by Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (‘NLMK’, Russia), |
| --- | --- |

—

NLMK Belgium Holdings SA (‘NBH’, Belgium), jointly controlled by Société Wallonne de Gestion et des Participations SA (‘Sogepa’, Belgium) and NLMK International B.V., which in turn is ultimately controlled by Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (‘NLMK’, Russia),

| — | NLMK DanSteel A/S (‘NLMK DanSteel’, Denmark), ultimately controlled by NLMK. |
| --- | --- |

—

NLMK DanSteel A/S (‘NLMK DanSteel’, Denmark), ultimately controlled by NLMK.

NBH intends to acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of NLMK DanSteel.

The concentration is to be accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | NBH and its subsidiaries are active in production, sale and distribution of semi-finished and finished flat steel products, including hot-rolled steel plates (quarto plates) in Europe, |
| --- | --- |

—

NBH and its subsidiaries are active in production, sale and distribution of semi-finished and finished flat steel products, including hot-rolled steel plates (quarto plates) in Europe,

| — | NLMK DanSteel and its subsidiary are active in the production of hot-rolled steel plates (quarto plates) and distribution of steel products in Europe. |
| --- | --- |

—

NLMK DanSteel and its subsidiary are active in the production of hot-rolled steel plates (quarto plates) and distribution of steel products in Europe.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10847 – NBH / NLMK DANSTEEL

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
# C_2023195EN.01001201.xml

| 2.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/12

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.63328

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 195/11)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 22.3.2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.63328 |
| Member State | Hungary |
| Region | Közép-Dunántúl |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Regional investment aid to SK On Hungary Kft |
| Legal basis | Government Decree No. 210/2014 (VIII.27) |
| Type of measure | Individual Application within scheme
  SK On Hungary Kft. |
| Objective | Regional development (including territorial cooperation) |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 76 361 984 000 HUF
  Annual budget: 0 HUF |
| Intensity | 13,0  % |
| Duration | |
| Economic sectors | Manufacture of batteries and accumulators |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade |
| 1027 Budapest, Bem rakpart 47 |

Date of adoption of the decision

22.3.2022

Aid number

SA.63328

Member State

Hungary

Region

Közép-Dunántúl

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Regional investment aid to SK On Hungary Kft

Legal basis

Government Decree No. 210/2014 (VIII.27)

Type of measure

Individual Application within scheme

SK On Hungary Kft.

Objective

Regional development (including territorial cooperation)

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 76 361 984 000 HUF

Annual budget: 0 HUF

Intensity

13,0  %

Duration

Economic sectors

Manufacture of batteries and accumulators

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade

1027 Budapest, Bem rakpart 47

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
Exhibit 32.2








Chief Financial Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Stephen J. Gilhooly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Date:          August 18, 2009

/s/ Stephen J. GilhoolyStephen J. Gilhooly
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to TIB Financial Corp. and will be retained by TIB Financial
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT  32.1**

----

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO****18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Applera Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tony L. White, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)    | The        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                           |
|   | (2)    | The        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

| /s/ Tony    L. White       |
|----------------------------|
|                            |
| Chief Executive    Officer |

Date: September9, 2004

----
MEMORANDUM

DATE: July 2013

SUBJECT: Links to Navy and EPA websites for additional information on El Toro MCAS

FROM: Mary Aycock, Project Manager

EPA Region IX

TO: EPA Headquarters

Additional information and various documents related to El Toro MCAS are available at EPA’s 

“El Toro Marine Corps Air Station” website and the “Former Marine Corps Air Station El Toro” 

website of Naval Facilities Engineering Command Base Realignment and Closure Program 

Management Office:

 El Toro Marine Corps Air Station, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY, http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/sfund/r9sfdocw.nsf/ViewByEPAID/CA6170023208

(last visited June 4, 2013).

 Former Marine Corps Air Station El Toro, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Base 

Realignment and Closure Program Management Office, 

http://www.bracpmo.navy.mil/basepage.aspx?baseid=40&state=California&name=eltoro
Order entered June 27 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00031
- CV
JOY JACKSON
- ATKINS, Appellant

V. FREDERICK L. ATKINS, Appellee On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. DF
- 13
- 02571



### O RDER The reporter’s record in this case is overdue in this appeal . By postcard dated March 4, 2014, we notified Glenda Johnson, Official Court Reporter for the 256th Judicial District Court
that the reporter’s record was overdu e. We directed Ms. Johnson to file the record within thirty days. By order dated April 4, 2014 we again notified Ms. Johnson the reporters record was
overdue and ordered her to file, within ten days of the date of that order, either: (1) the reporter’s

rec ord; (2) written verification that no hearings were recorded; or (3) written verification that appellant has not paid or made arra ngements to pay for the record. To date, Ms. Johnson has neither filed the record nor otherwise corresponded with the Court r egarding the record. This appeal cannot proceed without the issue of the reporter’s record being resolved.Accordingly, this Court ORDERS court reporter Glenda Johnson to file the reporter’s

record with TEN DAYS . We expressly CAUTION Glenda Johnson that failure to comply with this order may result in an order that she not sit as a court reporter until she complies.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the following persons: Honorable David Lopez Presiding Jud ge 256th Judicial District Court George Allen Sr. Courts Building 600 Commerce Street, St. 440 Dallas, TX 75202 Glenda Johnson Official Court Reporter 256th Judicial District Court George Allen Sr. Courts Building 600 Commerce Street, St. 440 Dallas, TX 75 202

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
[LETTERHEAD OF MENG UND PARTNER AG BADEN]

                                                Report of the statutory auditors
                                                to the general meeting of
                                                Tambour Paints Ltd
                                                CH - 8953 DIETIKON

As statutory auditors, we have audited the accounting record and the financial
statements (balance sheet, income statement and notes) of Tambour Paints Ltd for
the year ended December 31, 1997.

These financial statements are the responsibility of the board of directors. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit. We confirm that we meet the legal requirements concerning
professional qualification and independence.

Our audit was conducted in accordance with auditing standards promulgated by the
profession, which require that an audit be planned and performed to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from
material misstatement. We have examined on a test basis evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. We have also assessed the
accounting principles used, significant estimates made and the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the accounting record and financial statements comply with the
law and the company's articles of incorporation.

We recommend that the financial statements submitted to you be approved.

Baden/Switzerland, 29th April 1998

                              MENG UND PARTNER AG BADEN


                              /s/ Karl Peterhans            /s/ Rudolf Lehmann

                              Karl Peterhans                Rudolf Lehmann
                              Certified accountant          Certified accountant
                              (in charge of the audit)
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2914 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2914

    To amend title 38, United States Code, to require congressional 
 approval before the appropriation of funds for Department of Veterans 
                 Affairs major medical facility leases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2015

 Ms. Brownley of California (for herself, Mr. Takano, Mr. Thompson of 
 California, Ms. Pingree, Mrs. Dingell, and Mr. Zinke) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 38, United States Code, to require congressional 
 approval before the appropriation of funds for Department of Veterans 
                 Affairs major medical facility leases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Build a Better VA Act''.

SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MAJOR 
              MEDICAL FACILITY LEASES.

    (a) In General.--Section 8104(a)(2) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``No funds'' and inserting ``(A) No 
        funds'';
            (2) by striking ``or any major medical facility lease'';
            (3) by striking ``or lease''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(B) No funds may be appropriated for any fiscal year for any 
major medical facility lease unless the Committees on Veterans' Affairs 
of the Senate and House of Representatives adopt resolutions approving 
the lease.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to a lease entered into after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
P. 1


# OAR Box 1191 Prepped byCandice Davis



### Document

Number: 

# 28 ) IV-E-0 1 Docket Number: 

# A-90-2 7

Printed 5/13/20087:58:47

AM Sheet 28of 51P. 2 

## A-9o-2 7

y*° sr<r«
% y UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENCY Offic e o fAi rQualit yPlannin g an d Standard s Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1



### \»n v 199 1 MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT :

FROM :
TO : Novembe r 4 , 199 1 Teleconferenc e wit hEnvironmenta l

Protectio n Agenc y(EPA ) representative s an d lega l counse l representing th e Minnesot a Minin g an d Manufacturin g Compan y("3M" ) an

d th e Allianc e fo r Responsibl e CF C Polic y("th e Alliance" ) D . Ken t Berry»«f

) /< fe-^p Deput yDirector , Ai r Qualit yMOTiagement Divisio n (MD-15 ) " Docke t No . A-90-2 7 O n Novembe r 4 , 1991 , U.S . EPAofficial s ha d a teleconferenc e wit hattorney s fromGardner , Carto n & Douglas , representing 3 M an d th e Alliance , t o discus s thei r clients ' concern s abou t th e timing o f EPA' s fina l actio n o n th e rulemaking proposa l publishe d i n th e Federa l Registe r o n Marc h18 , 199 1 (5 6 Fed . Reg . 11387 ) an d proposin g t o exemp t certai n compound s from regulatio n a s volatil e organi c compound s (VOC's ) du e t o thei r negligibl e reactivity . Th e following individual s participate d i n th e teleconference : Ken t Berry , EPA Ric hOssias , EPA Vicki e Patton , EPA Matthe wPlache , Gardner , Carto n & Dougla s fo r 3 M an d th e Allianc e Pete r Wyckoff , Gardner , Carto n & Dougla s fo r 3 M an d th e Allianc e Summaryo f Discussio n A t th e outse t o f th e teleconferenc e EPAofficial s indicate d tha t EPAwoul d documen t th e teleconferenc e fo r placemen t i n th e rulemakin g docket .

\ &
\ ,FV3 _ 

# r' ~' " 

# " " '

Generally , lega l counse l fo r 3 Man d th e Allianc e conveye d thei r concer n abou t th e timing o f EPA' s fina l actio n o n th e propose d rul e reference d above . Theyindicate d tha t 3 Mha s encountere d difficult yi n marketin g some o f th e compound s identifie d i n EPA' s proposa l (i.e. , th e perfluorocarbons ) a s chlorofluorocarbon s substitute s becaus e EPAha s no t ye t take n fina l actio n o n th e propose d rule . Theyrequeste d tha t EPA endeavo r t o ensur e completio n o f th e fina l rul e a s expeditiousl y a s possible . EPAexplaine d th e anticipate d schedul e fo r finalizing th e proposal , indicating tha t a n abbreviate d interna l agenc yrevie wo f th e draf t fina l rul e woul d begi n nex t wee k an d tha t EPAexpect s t o submi t th e draf t fina l rul e fo r interagenc y revie wi n earl yDecember . Lega l counse l fo r 3 Man d th e Allianc e indicate d tha t theywoul d writ e o r otherwis e contac t certai n official s wh o mayb e abl e t o facilitat e th e finalizatio n o f th e propose d rule .
cc : Vicki e Patton , EPA , OG C (LE-132A )

1 Th e substantiv e conten t o f th e draf t fina l rul e wa s no t discussed .
SCWC-15-0000342 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I 

STATE OF HAWAI#I, 

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant, 

vs. 

RUDOLPH G. KING, JR., 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee. 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS 

(CAAP-15-0000342; CR. NO. 14-1-1986) 

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

 Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee Rudolph G. King, Jr.’s 

Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on August 19, 2016, is 

hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The 

parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding 

scheduling. 

 DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 29, 2016. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-15-0000342

29-SEP-2016

10:09 AM
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

YOLANDA ZAVALA

,

Appellant,

v.

MIGUEL ZAVALA MEJIA

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00009

- CV

Appeal from the

388th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2018DCV4780)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We further order Appellant pay all costs of this appeal,

and this decision be certified bel ow for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 14 TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Soto, J.J.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7291

LONNIE MCDONOVAN GHOLSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LIEUTENANT RICE, UMT in Building Two; MAJOR

THORNE; C. E. THOMPSON, Warden; SERGEANT

FLEKER; SERGEANT WILLIAMS, Caucasian Male;

OFFICER CRUSHFIELD; OFFICER JACKSON, Slim,

tall, redhead, male corrections officer working on 8 to 4 shift in Building Two; OFFICER

JACKSON, Male, black officer on TAC Team; FAYE

NEWCOMB, Corrections Officer; CORRECTIONS OFFICER TERRY, Female, black officer working on

day shift; CORRECTIONS OFFICER TERRY, Female,

black officer working 4 to 12 shift; CORRECTIONS OFFICER HITE, Works in Building One;

SERGEANT BOYD; CORRECTIONS OFFICER FREEMAN,

Works Building Two on 4 to 12; OFFICER DUFFY;

OFFICER JACKSON, Middle age caucasian on TAC

team,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

CORRECTIONS OFFICER ROYSTER; NURSE MONEY;

CORRECTIONS OFFICER SMITH, 6 foot 3, dark

skin, male officer works on 8 to 4 shift in

Building Two; CORRECTIONS OFFICER SMITH,

Short, black, male officer who works on 4 to

12 shift; OFFICER TERRY,

Defendants.
2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-94-695-2)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 17, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lonnie McDonovan Gholson, Appellant Pro Se. Lance Bradford Leggitt,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Gholson v. Rice, No. CA-94-695-2 (E.D. Va. June 29, 1995;

July 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Mark
W. Simon, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
of Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certify that,
to the best of my knowledge:

         1.       The Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the period ended
                  December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:  March 15, 2004                     /s/ Mark W. Simon
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Mark W. Simon, Senior Vice President,
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Corporate
                                          Secretary