alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
     THIS STATEMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOW, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000077242
<NAME>                        PG ENERGY INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      280,950,000
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    3,981,000
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         65,182,000
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       40,684,000
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 390,797,000
<COMMON>                                       34,944,000
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      44,546,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            47,148,000
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 126,638,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          240,000
<PREFERRED>                                    4,831,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           95,000,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             1,200,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  68,248,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 94,640,000
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  390,797,000
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      158,951,000
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           4,237,000
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     136,686,000
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     140,923,000
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        18,028,000
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             651,000
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 18,679,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       10,508,000
<NET-INCOME>                                   8,171,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    1,191,000
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  6,980,000
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       416,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      4,837,000
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         19,764,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.74
        



</TABLE>
# C_2022263EN.01002101.xml

| 8.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/21

---

Notice of a request concerning the applicability of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU

Request made by a Contracting Entity

(2022/C 263/07)

On 19 April 2022 the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (1). The request has been submitted by the Republic of Italy, on behalf of Poste Italiane S.p.A. The first working day following receipt of the request is 20 April 2022.

This request concerns activities relating to the provision of mail service management services in Italy.

Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU provides that ‘contracts intended to enable an activity mentioned in Articles 8 to 14 to be carried out shall not be subject to this Directive if the Member State or the contracting entities having introduced the request pursuant to Article 35 can demonstrate that, in the Member State in which it is performed, the activity is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted; nor shall design contests that are organised for the pursuit of such an activity in that geographic area be subject to this Directive’. The assessment of direct exposure to competition that can be carried out in the context of Directive 2014/25/EU is without prejudice to the full-fledged application of competition law.

The Commission is allowed a period of 145 (2) working days to take a decision on this request, commencing on the working day referred to above. The period therefore expires on 18 November 2022.

According to Article 35(5) of Directive 2014/25/EU, further requests concerning the same activities in Italy submitted before the expiry of the period opened in respect of this request shall not be considered as new procedures and shall be treated in the context of this request.

---

(1)  Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement procedures by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243).

(2)  Pursuant to paragraph 1 b of Annex IV to Directive 2014/25/EU in combination with the second subparagraph of said paragraph 1.

---
# C_2023030EN.01000601.xml

| 27.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10983 – ALTAREA / CARREFOUR / SNC ALTACAR SARTROUVILLE / SNC ALTACAR NANTES)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 30/06)

On 18 January 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M10983. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M10983. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### Pfister, Appellee, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellant.

(No. 28781

Decided March 18, 1942.)

*Messrs. Krusling & Krusling,*for appellee.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. E. P. Felher,*for appellant.

*400By the Court.

The only question in this case is whether there is any evidence to warrant payment of workmen’s compensation.

Claimant testified that he entered the employ of the complying employer in April of 1935 when 18 years of age; that his disability “first developed like sort of a stiff back, but became worse as I worked, around in December 1935, seemed like I had a stiff back at the time”; that he first consulted a physician in March 1936; that he was compelled to leave his work for three days commencing August 22; that his work was changed to inventory clerk; and that he discontinued working on December 11, 1936.

There is no evidence whatever of an injury accidental in origin and cause or of a sudden and unexpected happening at a particular time. *Goodman*v. *Industrial Commission,*135 Ohio St., 81, 19 N. E. (2d), 508; *Industrial Commission*v. *Lambert,*126 Ohio St., 501, 186 N. E., 89; *Industrial Commission*v. *Minard,*126 Ohio St., 641, 186 N. E., 708.

Medical testimony was introduced to establish trauma and causal connection. However, such testimony was merely to the effect that claimant’s condition could have been or possibly was the result of trauma. As heretofore held by this court, the proof must establish a *probability*and not a mere *possibility. Drakulich*v. *Industrial Commission,*137 Ohio St., 82, 27 N. E. (2d), 932.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and judgment is rendered for the appellant.

*Judgment reversed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Bettman, J., not participating.
#### MYERS v. STATE.

No. 19556.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 3, 1938.

*257D. L. Harry, of Jacksonville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is possessing beer for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $100 and confinement in jail for 30 days.

No bills of exception are brought forward.

The proof on the part of the state was sufficient to show that an election in Cherokee county had resulted in the prohibition of the sale of intoxicating liquors. Moreover, it was uncontroverted that appellant, who operated a café and cold drink stand, had in his possession near his place of business in said county 96 bottles of Blatz beer. This beer was discovered by officers when, operating under a search warrant, they searched a garage belonging to the appellant. One of the officers said: “The beer was in a built-in garage of the residence.” Appellant offered no testimony.

We deem the evidence sufficient to support the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
# C_2022393EN.01001701.xml

| 13.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 393/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 393/17

---

Notice of a request concerning the applicability of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU

Request made by a Contracting Entity

(2022/C 393/09)

On 19 April 2022 the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (1). The request has been submitted by the Republic of Italy, on behalf of Poste Italiane S.p.A. The first working day following receipt of the request is 20 April 2022.

This request concerns activities relating to the provision of mail service management services in Italy. The relevant notice was published on page number 21 of OJ C 263 of 8 July 2022. The initial deadline was 18 November 2022.

Pursuant to the fourth subparagraph of paragraph 1 to Annex IV of Directive 2014/25/EU, the deadline may be extended by the Commission with the agreement of those having made the request for exemption concerned. As agreed by the Commission and the applicant, the period available to the Commission for deciding on this request is hereby extended by 37 working days.

The final deadline therefore expires on 18 January 2023.

---

(1)  Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement procedures by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243).

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack (the “Company”) for the year ended February 3,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”),

I, Jeffrey C.Rachor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

(i)            The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)        The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| Date:  April 18, 2007 | /s/ JEFFREY  C. RACHOR |
|---------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                            | Jeffrey C. Rachor           |
|                            | *Chief Executive Officer*   |

 

----
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Maxine Adams and Cecil Adams v. Rebecca Ross

Appellate case number: 01

- 11

- 00552

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 10

- 12207

Trial court: 269th District Court of Harri s County

The Maxine Adams and Cecil Adams

, “ Appellants

, ” have filed a “Joint Motion for Compliance with Court Ordered Appellate Record,” complaining of the omission of unspecified
documents from the clerk’s record. Before the Court will rule on the motion, t he Appellants are ordered to furnish the Court with the following:

1) File

- stamped copies of the supplemental record designations from which the Appellants contend documents requested have been omitted from the clerk’s record;

2) A list of the documents omitted from the clerk’s record

, and appeari ng on the file

stamped supplemental record designations

, that Cecil Adams contends are necessary for review of the appellate issue the trial court determined was not frivolous ―i.e., “July 27, 2011 Granted Directed Verdict: Deceptive Trade Practices Act Claim
Unconscionable Eviction.” Cecil should file a one

- sentence explanation of the necessity of each document; and

3) A list of the documents omitted from the clerk’s record

, and appearing on the file

stamped supplemental record designations

, that Maxine Adams contends are relevant to her appeal and for which she is willing to make payment arrangements with the

district clerk for inclusion in a supplemental record.

Because of the significant delays in this appeal, the Court suspends the application of rule 9.2(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the “mailbox rule,” for the filing of the items requested in this order; the filing must be received in the clerk’s office or f iled in accordance
with this court’s rules on e

- filing no later than Monday, May 20, 2013

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2, 9.2(b).

.A briefing deadline will be set when the Court rules on the “Joint Motion for Compliance

with Court Ordered Appellate Record, ” but the Appellants should begin preparation of their appellants’ brief with the documents that are presently in the appellate record because, once the briefing deadline is set , no extension s of time will be granted for the filing of brief s absent proof of extraordinary circumstances.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

Acting individually

Date: May 13, 2013
**EXHIBIT 32.1****OFFICERS’CERTIFICATIONS****Certification of Chief Executive Officer**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Arden Realty, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge, that: (i) the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for theperiod ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.        Date: August 5, 2005 By:  /s/ Richard S. Ziman    Richard S. Ziman    Chairman of the Board andChief Executive OfficerArden Realty, Inc.   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
EXHIBIT 4.3



                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                        FIRST MERCHANTS CAPITAL TRUST II

     This Certificate of Trust is being executed as of December 12, 2001 for the
purposes of organizing a business trust pursuant to the Delaware Business Trust
Act, 12 Del. C.ss.ss.3801 et seq. (the "Act").

     The undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

1.   Name. The name of the business trust is "First Merchants Capital Trust II"
     (the "Trust").

2.   Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the Delaware trustee of
     the Trust meeting the requirements of Section 3807 of the Act are as
     follows:

     First Union Trust Company, National Association
     One Rodney Square
     920 King Street
     Suite 102
     Wilmington, Delaware 19801
     Attention:  Corporate Trust Trustee Administration

3.   Effective. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective immediately upon
     filing in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned being all of the trustees of the Trust,
have duly executed this Certificate of Trust as of the day and year first above
written.

FIRST UNION TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as Delaware Trustee


By:            /s/ Edward L. Truitt, Jr.
     -----------------------------------------------------
     Name:    Edward L. Truitt, Jr.
          ------------------------------------------------
     Title:      Vice President
           -----------------------------------------------



                                      -1-
<PAGE>

ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTEE


     /s/ Michael L. Cox
-----------------------------------------------------
     Michael L. Cox


ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTEE


     /s/ Larry R. Helms
-----------------------------------------------------
     Larry R. Helms, Esq.


ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTEE


     /s/ Mark K. Hardwick
-----------------------------------------------------
     Mark K. Hardwick



                                      -2-
Albany

Atlanta

Brussels

Denver

Los Angeles

Miami

New York

1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

Tel: 703.336.8800

mckennalong.com

Northern Virginia

Orange County

Rancho Santa Fe

San Diego

San Francisco

Seoul

Washington, DC

Dane B. Jaques 

703.336.8709

Mark E. McKinnon

703.336.8708

Matthew J. Clark

703.336.8714

Email Address

djaques@mckennalong.com

mmckinnon@mckennalong.com

mclark@mckennalong.com

June 1, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Submission of Additional Information in Support of PG&E's Petition for 

Exemption (Docket No. FAA-2015-0708)

To Whom it May Concern:

As you are aware, this office represents Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) regarding 

the above-referenced Petition for Exemption, in which PG&E seeks regulatory relief to allow 

commercial operation of small unmanned aircraft system (sUAS). Please accept this letter as 

confirmation of our response to the Request for Additional Information received from Nia Daniels, 

Program Analyst, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aviation Safety, Airmen and Airspace 

Rules Division, on May 18, 2015. 

The additional supporting material contains proprietary and confidential information and was 

submitted electronically to Ms. Daniels and via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov on June 1, 2015. 

If you have any questions or require any additional information to process PG&E's Petition, 

please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP

Dane B. Jaques

Mark E. McKinnon

Matthew J. Clark

Counsel for Pacific Gas and Electric Company
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the quarter ended September
30, 2007 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ C. Reynolds Thompson, III

     C. Reynolds Thompson, IIIChief Executive Officer of Colonial Properties Trust,the general partner of Colonial Realty Limited
PartnershipNovember 9, 2007
 47
# C_2023231EN.01000301.xml

| 30.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/3

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107687

(2023/C 231/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 5.6.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107687 |
| Member State | Poland |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCTF: Pomoc dla producentów pszenicy i gryki |
| Legal basis | Par. 13zw of the Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 27 January 2015 on the detailed scope and manner of implementation of certain tasks of the Agency for Restructuring and Modernization of Agriculture (J.O., item 187, as amended) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | |
| Budget | |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Growing of cereals (except rice), leguminous crops and oil seeds |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Agencja Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa |
| ul. Poleczki 33,02-822 Warszawa |

Date of adoption of the decision

5.6.2023

Aid number

SA.107687

Member State

Poland

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCTF: Pomoc dla producentów pszenicy i gryki

Legal basis

Par. 13zw of the Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 27 January 2015 on the detailed scope and manner of implementation of certain tasks of the Agency for Restructuring and Modernization of Agriculture (J.O., item 187, as amended)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Budget

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Growing of cereals (except rice), leguminous crops and oil seeds

Name and address of the granting authority

Agencja Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa

ul. Poleczki 33,02-822 Warszawa

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---