alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARIF ALI DURRANI,

Petitioner,

v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent. No s

. 18

- 72662 19

- 70546
Agency No. A021

- 763

- 558

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of Order s of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 20, 2021 * *
Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Arif Ali Durrani, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions pro se for review

of t he Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) ord er dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision finding him removable and denying his motion to

terminate , his motion to remand, and his application for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# F ILED

APR 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 18

- 72662

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) (petition No.

18

- 72662) and the BIA’s order denying his motion to reopen or reconsider
(petition No. 19

- 70546). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

for abuse of discretio n the denial of a motion to terminate. Dominguez v. Barr , 975 F.3d 725, 734 (9th Cir. 2020). We review de novo legal claims regarding
United States citizenship , Hughes v. Ashcroft , 255 F.3d 7 52 , 755 (9th Cir. 2001) ,
and claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings , Padilla

- Martinez

v. Holder , 770 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2014). We review for abuse of discretion

the denial of a motion to reopen or reconsider. Ghahremani v. Gonzales , 498 F.3d
993, 997 (9th Cir. 2007)

. We deny th e petitions for review.

As to petition No. 18

- 72662, in his opening brief, Durrani does not challenge

the bases for the agency’s removability determination, the denial of his motion to
remand, or the bases for denying his claims for asylum, withholding of removal,

and CAT. See Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder , 706 F.3d 1072, 1079

- 1080 (9th Cir.
2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are
waived)

. The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Durrani ’s motion to

terminate where he failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact as to whether
he acquired citizenship. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(5)(A). Durrani’s contention that
the agency violated his right to due process or otherwise erred in its analysis of his3 18

- 72662

claim fails

. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error
to prevail on a due process claim).

As to petition No. 19

- 70546, the agency did not abuse its discretion in
denying Durrani’s motion to reopen or to reconsider, where he did not establish
prima facie eligibility for relief or identify any error of law or fact in the BIA’s
prior decision

. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1) , (c)(1).
All pending motions are denied.

PETITION S FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# C_2022150EN.01000101.xml

| 5.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 150/1

---

Notice for the attention of the person to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/740 and Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in South Sudan apply

(2022/C 150/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the person that appears in Annex II to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/740 (1) and Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735 (2) concerning restrictive measures in respect of the situation in South Sudan.

The Council intends to maintain the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned person with a new statement of reasons. This person is hereby informed that he may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statement of reasons for his designation, by 12 April 2022, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu. |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu.

---

(1)  OJ L 117, 8.5.2015, p. 52.

(2)  OJ L 117, 8.5.2015, p. 13.

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2023086EN.01001201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/12 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11041 – VERDANE CAPITAL 2020 / FSN CAPITAL VI / POLYTECH GROUP)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 86/10)

1.

On 28 February 2023, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2023086EN.01001201-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | FSN Capital VI (United Kingdom), controlled by FSN Capital, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Verdane Capital 2020 (Sweden), controlled by Verdane Advisors Holding AS, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | VC VIII Polytech Holding ApS (‘Polytech Group’, Denmark), currently solely controlled by Verdane Capital 2020 |

Verdane Capital 2020 and FSN Capital VI will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control over the Polytech Group.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | FSN Capital VI is a private equity fund focusing on investments in the Nordics, Austria, Germany and Switzerland, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Verdane Capital 2020 is an investment fund active in the consumer internet, software, energy and advanced industrial sectors. |

3.

The business activities of the Polytech Group are the following: developing, manufacturing and distributing critical, specialised rotor blade component products for wind turbines worldwide.

4.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2023086EN.01001201-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

5.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11041 – VERDANE CAPITAL 2020 / FSN CAPITAL VI / POLYTECH GROUP

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2023086EN.01001201-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2023086EN.01001201-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Michael Gowaii

7 01/5/

Robertson Unit

I207I FM 3522

Abilene, TX 79G01

COUHTOF nasMiwS. APPEALS

APR 3 0 2015

AbelAcosta,Cterk

Abel Acosta

Cler, Court of Crifti-i-iidl Appeals

P.O. Box 12308, Capitol Station

Austin, 'IX 78711-2305

April 27, 2015

RE: PDR filed; Cowan v. State, No. 02-14-0 034 /-CR (Ft. Worth)

i-5 r. Acosta;

Please provide i>ie the nuiuber this Office assiyned to ruy PBR

in the above referenced appeal.

Please • provide we a list of ail juayes currently sittiny on

this Court.

Thank you for your service arid proiupt response in this niatter.

Sincerely ,
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 28, 2015

t0720 

# Order

Clerk July 28, 2015

150214

Estate of ANDREW BALL, JR.

__________________________________________

KAREN ELAINE KEYWORTH, Personal

Representative for the Estate of ANDREW BALL,

JR. and ELAINE PULLEN BALL,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 150214

COA: 314861

Ct of Claims: 12

- 000128

- MH

STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF

MILITARY AND VETERANS’ AFFAIRS and

GRAND RAPIDS HOME FOR VETERANS,

Defendants

- Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 26, 2014

judgmen t of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 23(b)



[NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. LETTERHEAD]



CONSENT OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

As oil and gas consultants, we hereby consent to the use of our name and our report dated October 28, 2003 in this Form 10-K, incorporated by reference into Peoples Energy Corporation's previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 2-82760, 33-6369, 333-17701, 333-84594, 333-70702, and 333-62070.

| | NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
| | -------------------------------------
| |                                      
| | By: /s/ Danny D. Simmons             
| | Danny D. Simmons                     
| | Executive Vice President             

Houston, Texas
December 9, 2003
# C_2022417EN.01001401.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 417/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 417/14

---

Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2022/C 417/08)

Pursuant to Article 9(1), point (a), of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are amended as follows:

On page 343, after the Explanatory note to subheading 8479 40 00, the following Explanatory note is inserted:

| ‘8479 89 70 | Automated electronic component placement machines of a kind used solely or principally for the manufacture of printed circuit assemblies |
| --- | --- |

‘8479 89 70

Automated electronic component placement machines of a kind used solely or principally for the manufacture of printed circuit assemblies

This subheading includes printed circuit board assembly machines for mounting active, passive or connecting components on printed circuits (pick-and-place machines). These components are automatically fed to the machine on tapes (belts). The machines position the components exactly at the intended locations and mount them on the printed circuit. After the components have been mounted, they are fixed to the printed circuit by, for example, soldering or contact bonding. Apart from the assembly of semiconductor devices, these machines are also able to pick and place other components on substrates’;

and in the Explanatory note to subheading 8479 89 97, point 3 is deleted.

On page 357, the Explanatory note to subheading 8529 90 92 is deleted.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 119, 29.3.2019, p. 1.

2

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6659

CHARLES RAY CARTER,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

HENRY MCMASTER; JOHN PATE, Warden,

Respondents – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (8:10-cv-00525-HMH)

Submitted: March 28, 2011 Decided: April 4, 2011

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Ray Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Ray Carter seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Carter has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We deny the motion to place the case in abeyance 

and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# Official Journal C 152/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 152 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 623 May 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 152

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 623 May 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 152/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| 2019/C 152/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 4 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 152/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

2019/C 152/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2795 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to submit 

a study on the circumstances which may impact the 

effectiveness and availability of first responders before, 

during, or after a terrorist threat or event. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2795 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘First Responder Iden3 tification of Emergency Needs in Disaster Situations’’ or 

4 the ‘‘FRIENDS Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY IMPACT FIRST RE6 SPONDERS DURING A TERRORIST EVENT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 

9 of the United States shall submit to the Committee on 

10 Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and 

11 the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 

12 Affairs of the Senate a report that describes select State 

13 and local programs and policies, as appropriate, related 

14 to the preparedness and protection of first responders. 

15 The report may include information on— 

16 (1) the degree to which such programs and poli17 cies include consideration of the presence of a first 

18 responder’s family in an area impacted by a terrorist 

19 attack; 

20 (2) the availability of personal protective equip21 ment for first responders; 

22 (3) the availability of home Medkits for first re23 sponders and their families for biological incident re24 sponse; and 

25 (4) other related factors. 
3 

•HR 2795 EH

1 (b) CONTEXT.—In preparing the report required 

2 under subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the 

3 United States may, as appropriate, provide information— 

4 (1) in a format that delineates high risk urban 

5 areas from rural communities; and 

6 (2) on the degree to which the selected State 

7 and local programs and policies included in the re8 port were developed or are being executed with fund9 ing from the Department of Homeland Security, in10 cluding grant funding from the State Homeland Se11 curity Grant Program or the Urban Area Security 

12 Initiative under sections 2002 and 2003, respec13 tively, of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 

14 U.S.C. 603 and 604). 

15 (c) HOMELAND SECURITY CONSIDERATION.—After 

16 issuance of the report required under subsection (a), the 

17 Secretary of Homeland Security shall consider the report’s 

18 findings and assess its applicability for Federal first re19 sponders. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 

2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2795 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to 

threat or event. responders before, during, or after a terrorist impact the effectiveness and availability of first submit a study on the circumstances which may
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Support for Research Excellence (SuRE) Program and Support for Research Excellence—First Independent Research (SuRE-First) Award (R16).                    

*Date:*                         October 31-November 1, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         John J. Laffan, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN18J, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, 301-594-2773,                         *laffanjo@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 18, 2024.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-21740 Filed 9-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2022427EN.01001001.xml

| 9.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/10

---

COMMUNITY PLANT VARIETY OFFICE

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2021

(2022/C 427/10)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://cpvo.europa.eu/en/about-us/finance-and-budget

---
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

32 34 36 38 40 

### ★

▲ ▲
▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/08 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
Brake Energy/Traction Work Weighted 

Using Proposed Weighting for A to B 

Certification

Engine 

Rated 

Power 

Brake 

Energy/ 

Positive 

Brake 

Energy/ 

Positive 

Distance 

Based 

Pre-trans 

Distance 

Based 

Cummins 

Braking 

Energy/eFTP Power 

(kW)

Positive 

Work

Positive 

Work 

Weighted

Based 

Weighting Based 

Weighting

Energy/eFTP

Positive 

Engine Work

339 0.52 0.39 0.44 0.42 0.49

201 0.49 0.36 0.32 0.30 0.35

149 0.42 0.32 0.25 0.23 0.22