alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 184 (Monday, September 23, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 77470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21642]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 1 and 64

[WC Docket No. 24-213; MD Docket No. 10-234; FCC 24-85; FR ID 245867]


Improving the Effectiveness of the Robocall Mitigation Database; 
Amendment of CORES Registration System; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission published a document in 
the Federal Register of September 12, 2024, proposing changes to 
procedural steps filers must take in the Robocall Mitigation Database. 
The document contained an incorrectly identified docket. This document 
corrects the misidentified docket, GN Docket No. 24-213, to the correct 
docket, WC Docket No. 24-213.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erik Beith, Competition Policy 
Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-0756, or email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8aeff8e3e1a4e8efe3fee2caece9e9a4ede5fc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6c3d4cfcd88c4c3cfd2cee6c0c5c588c1c9d0">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    1. In the Federal Register of September 12, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024-
20176, on page 74184, in the second column, under document headings, 
correct the identified docket to read: [WC Docket No. 24-213; MD Docket 
No. 10-234; FCC 24-85; FR ID 240720]
    2. In the third column, in the Supplementary Information section, 
in the first sentence, correct ``GN Docket No. 24-213'' to read ``WC 
Docket No. 24-213.''

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-21642 Filed 9-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6385

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EARL ANDERSON FRANKLIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-95-276, CA-97-1251-1)

Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 4, 1999

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earl Anderson Franklin, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Earl Anderson Franklin seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Franklin, Nos. CR-95-276;

CA-97-1251-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 1060** 

NATIONAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v. WINSTON L. SPENCE, JR., Individually and as parent and next friend of J. S., a minor , Defendant

– Appellant , and

JAYSON SPENCE , Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judg e. ( 3:11

- cv - 00031

- JPB )

Submitted : May 31, 2012 Decided: June 7, 2012

Before KEENAN , WYNN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Winston L. Spence, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charity K. Flynn, SPILMAN, THOMAS & BA TTLE, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Winston L. Spence, Jr., appeals the district court ’ s
order granting summary judgmen t to National Benefit Life

Insurance Com pany and determining that the proceeds of Silvana
Sital’s life insurance policy should be divided equally between
her sons, Jayson Spence , an adult, and J.S

. , a minor. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for t he reasons stated by the district court. Nat ’ l
Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Spence , Case No. 3:11

- cv - 00031

- JPB
(N.D. W. Va. Dec. 12, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately present ed
in the materials befor e the C ourt and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2022159EN.01000401.xml

| 12.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10657 – SAMSUNG BIOLOGICS / SAMSUNG BIOEPIS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 159/04)

On 4 April 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10657. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10657. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2023266EN.01000301.xml

| 28.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/3

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107951

(2023/C 266/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 12.7.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107951 |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCTF: Tillage Incentive Support Scheme 2023 |
| Legal basis | Ministers and Secretaries Act 1924 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 10 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine |
| Government Buildings, Abbeyleix Road, Portlaoise Co. Laois, Ireland |

Date of adoption of the decision

12.7.2023

Aid number

SA.107951

Member State

Ireland

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCTF: Tillage Incentive Support Scheme 2023

Legal basis

Ministers and Secretaries Act 1924

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 10 000 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine

Government Buildings, Abbeyleix Road, Portlaoise Co. Laois, Ireland

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA

---
Opinion issued June 21, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-17-00839-CV

———————————

VIVIAN ROBBINS, Appellant

V.

SUSAN SOLIS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2001-37897

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Vivian Robbins, proceeding pro se, has neither paid the required 

filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.851(b), 51.941(a), 

101.041(1) (West 2013); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases 
2

in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, 

Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Furthermore, appellant has neither 

paid nor made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified by this Court’s May 15, 2018 Order and 

Notice of Intent to Dismiss for Want of Jurisdiction that this appeal was subject to 

dismissal for want of prosecution unless she paid the required fees within 30 days of 

the date of that order, appellant failed to timely respond to that order. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to pay 

all required fees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Massengale.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Charles Ray Miller, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00127

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 8th District Court of Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 1423724 ). Opinion delivered by J ustice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. W e note that the appellant, Charles Ray Miller, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 1 2, 2014 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 99.1
                                  ------------




                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant  to section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  the  undersigned
hereby certifies that this quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  and the
information  contained in the quarterly report fairly presents,  in all material
respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of Commodore Applied
Technologies, Inc.




/s/ Shelby T. Brewer
-----------------------
Shelby T. Brewer
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003
# C_2023344EN.01011601.xml

| 29.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/116 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/116

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10883 – BLACKSTONE / RIVEAN / ESDEC SOLAR GROUP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 344/05)

On 10 October 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10883. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10883. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
UNITED STATES CO URT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. BILLY R. MELOT, Defendant-Appellant, and KATHERINE L. MELOT; KLM TRUST; LEIGH CORPORATION; SUZANNE CORPORATION; MIRROR FARMS, INC.; C.D. EXPRESS, INC., Defendants.

___________________ _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. KATHERINE L. MELOT, Defendant-Appellant, and BILLY R. MELOT; KLM TRUST; LEIGH CORPORATION; SUZANNE CORPORATION; MIRROR FARMS, INC.; C.D. EXPRESS, INC., Defendants. No. 14-2044 (D.C. No. 2:09-CV-00752-JCH-WPL) (D. N.M.)

No. 14-2045 (D.C. No. 2:09-CV-00752-JCH-WPL) (D. N.M.) FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### September 26, 2014

Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court- 2 - ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS AS MOOT

Before HARTZ , BALDOCK , and BACHARACH , Circuit Judges.

The district court issued an order fo r ejectment by the U.S. Marshal. Order (Mar. 25, 2014) (Doc. 433). Under that orde r, the Marshal was to forcibly remove Mrs. Melot and her family fro m property that had been sold in partial satisfaction of the Melots’ tax obligations. Mr. and Mrs. Melot appeal, and the United States moves for dismissal of Mrs. Melot’s appeal on the ground of mootness. 1 We grant the United States’ motion, concludi ng that the appeals are moot not only for Mrs. Melot, but also for Mr. Melot. “In general, a federal court cannot give opinions absent a live case or controversy before it. A case is moot when it is impossibl e for the court to grant any effectual relief whatever to a prevailing party.” Office of Thrift Supervision v. Overland Park Fin. Corp. (In re Overland Park Fin. Corp.) , 236 F.3d 1246, 1254 (10th Cir. 2001) (citation a nd internal quotation marks omitted). Though the United States does not address mootness for Mr . Melot, we must address the issue sua sponte

. See United States v. Hernandez-Garduno , 460 F.3d 1287, 1291 (10th Cir. 2006).

1 The United States moves for dismi ssal of Mr. Melot’s appeal based on standing. We need not address Mr. Melo t’s standing because hi s appeal is moot.- 3 - Neither appellant currently resides at the property. And in other appeals (Nos. 13-2225 & 13-2226), the United St ates informed this court that the property had been sold on July 21, 2014. Therefore, the Me lots cannot resume re siding at the property (even if Mr. Melot were to obtain release from prison). Under these circumstances, the appeals are moot because we cannot provide any effectiv e relief to either appellant. See Tymiak v. Omodt , 676 F.2d 306, 308 (8th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (holding that a request to enjo in an order of ejectment is moot because the requesting party had already been evicted from the premises by law enforc ement officials). Accordingly, we grant the United States’ mo tion to dismiss Mrs. Melot’s appeal and sua sponte dismiss Mr. Melot’s appeal. We grant the Melots’ motions for leave to respond out of time and to appear in forma pauperis. Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      43,671,260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              686,978,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                (4,128,404)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,394,122
<DEPRECIATION>                                 640,813
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             736,097,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    414,532,095
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       123,034
<OTHER-SE>                                  71,102,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               736,097,459
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            59,937,290
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            22,019,811
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             3,800,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          18,809,649
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,307,830
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,199,741
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,108,089
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,108,089
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023231EN.01000101.xml

| 30.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.104446

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 231/01)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 5.4.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.104446 |
| Member State | Denmark |
| Region | Denmark |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Produktionsstøtte til skrevne medier samt innovationspulje |
| Legal basis | Lov om mediestøtte (https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2013/1604) as amended by act 472/2017 (https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2017/472) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Culture, Sectorial development |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 858 000 000 DKK
  Annual budget: 429 000 000 DKK |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2024 |
| Economic sectors | Publishing of newspapers |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Slots- og Kulturstyrelsen |
| Hammerichsgade 14, 1611 København V |

Date of adoption of the decision

5.4.2023

Aid number

SA.104446

Member State

Denmark

Region

Denmark

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Produktionsstøtte til skrevne medier samt innovationspulje

Legal basis

Lov om mediestøtte (https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2013/1604) as amended by act 472/2017 (https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2017/472)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Culture, Sectorial development

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 858 000 000 DKK

Annual budget: 429 000 000 DKK

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2024

Economic sectors

Publishing of newspapers

Name and address of the granting authority

Slots- og Kulturstyrelsen

Hammerichsgade 14, 1611 København V

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
# C_2022241EN.01003201.xml

| 24.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/32

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10750 – Kärcher / Woco / Wairify)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 241/16)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Alfred Kärcher SE & Co. KG (‘Kärcher’, Germany), ultimately controlled by a number of natural persons, |
| --- | --- |

—

Alfred Kärcher SE & Co. KG (‘Kärcher’, Germany), ultimately controlled by a number of natural persons,

| — | Woco Franz Josef Wolf Holding GmbH (‘Woco’, Germany), ultimately controlled by a natural person, |
| --- | --- |

—

Woco Franz Josef Wolf Holding GmbH (‘Woco’, Germany), ultimately controlled by a natural person,

| — | Wairify GmbH (‘Wairify’, Germany), controlled by Woco. |
| --- | --- |

—

Wairify GmbH (‘Wairify’, Germany), controlled by Woco.

Kärcher and Woco will acquire within the meaning of Articles 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Wairify.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Kärcher is a globally active manufacturer and supplier of cleaning equipment for household and professional customers, |
| --- | --- |

—

Kärcher is a globally active manufacturer and supplier of cleaning equipment for household and professional customers,

| — | Woco is a globally active group of undertakings whose business activity includes the automotive engineering and industrial technology sectors, |
| --- | --- |

—

Woco is a globally active group of undertakings whose business activity includes the automotive engineering and industrial technology sectors,

| — | Wairify is developing a portable air purifier powerd by plasma technology. |
| --- | --- |

—

Wairify is developing a portable air purifier powerd by plasma technology.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10750 – Kärcher / Woco / Wairify

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---