alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022069EN.01000501.xml

| 10.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10547 – VOITH GROUP / VOITH HYDRO)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 69/05)

On 27 January 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10547. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10547. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### Wilkinson *v.*Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, Appellant.

Argued April 9, 1940.

Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Parker, Rhodes and Hirt, JJ.

*608
      *William A. Ohallener, Jr.,*with him *Frank■ McG. Painter*and *William A. Challener,*for appellant.

*Fred J. Jordan,*with him *Murray J. Jordan*and *Dale T. Lias,*for appellee.

April 29, 1940:

Per Curiam,

The appeal in this Workmen’s Compensation case is concerned only with questions of fact, and our province is to determine whether there is substantial evidence in the record sufficient to sustain the findings of fact of the referee, which were affirmed by the board.

While the form of the findings could have been improved, and they should have been segregated from the discussion, and; separately and concisely stated, there can be no doubt that the referee found—and the board approved the finding—that the claimant’s husband sustained an electrical shock, which aggravated a previously existing heart condition and resulted in his death.

The deceased, who was the operator of a traveling crane, within two hours after he started to work, was found lying dead over the controls in the cab room of the crane he operated. There was testimony that twelve ‘hot’ wires, with a voltage of 220 and an amperage of between 300 and 400, were exposed in the cab. The undertaker who prepared the body for burial, and who had examined the bodies of 50 to 100 persons who had been burnt by electrical current, testified that burns on the decedent’s right hand and on the left leg below the knee were electrical burns. No other explanation for them was given.

Three doctors testified that in their opinion death resulted from electrical shock.

The inferences to be drawn from all the testimony— and there was evidence in opposition to the claim—were for the fact finding body, and we are of opinion that the testimony was amply sufficient to sustain the findings.

Judgment affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION (Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, (i) the foregoing Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed by Yadkin Valley Company (the “Registrant”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

| Date:  August   4, 2004 | S/ David S. Perry                             |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                               |
|                         | David S.   Perry, President                   |
|                         | (principal   executive and financial officer) |
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the quarter ended June 30,
2007 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership.
 By:
    /s/     C. Reynolds Thompson, IIIC. Reynolds Thompson, IIIChief Executive Officer of Colonial Properties Trust,
the general partner of Colonial Realty
Limited
PartnershipAugust 8, 2007 45
# C_2022151EN.01000801.xml

| 6.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/8

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2022/C 151/08)

Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1)(1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

On page 111, the Explanatory note to subheading ‘

  2403 99 10 Chewing tobacco and snuff

  ’ is replaced by the following text:

| ‘2403 99 10 | Chewing tobacco and snuff (nasal tobacco)

  Chewing tobacco is tobacco in the form of rolls, sticks, strips, cubes and blocks, which is specially prepared to be chewed but not smoked and which is put up for retail sale. The tobacco is generally not ground.
  Snuff (nasal tobacco) is tobacco in dry powder or grain form, which has been specially treated so that it can be taken as snuff (nasal tobacco) but not smoked or taken by mouth.
  Provided that they satisfy the above conditions, products consisting in part of substances other than tobacco are classified in this subheading.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘2403 99 10

Chewing tobacco and snuff (nasal tobacco)

Chewing tobacco is tobacco in the form of rolls, sticks, strips, cubes and blocks, which is specially prepared to be chewed but not smoked and which is put up for retail sale. The tobacco is generally not ground.

Snuff (nasal tobacco) is tobacco in dry powder or grain form, which has been specially treated so that it can be taken as snuff (nasal tobacco) but not smoked or taken by mouth.

Provided that they satisfy the above conditions, products consisting in part of substances other than tobacco are classified in this subheading.’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 119, 29.3.2019, p. 1.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE UNAUDITED INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR 
BILLING CONCEPTS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1998
<CASH>                                         149,248
<SECURITIES>                                         4
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,692
<ALLOWANCES>                                       275
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               238,220
<PP&E>                                          38,227 
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,365
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,728
<BONDS>                                            200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           369
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   278,822
<SALES>                                          2,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,912
<CGS>                                            2,083
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,686
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,388
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,384
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,004
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,004
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022427EN.01002001.xml

| 9.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/20

---

EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2021

(2022/C 427/20)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/about/corporatedocs#financial

---
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Applera Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tony L. White, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   |   | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                     |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Tony L. White          Chief Executive Officer

Date:  September 8, 2005

 

----
#### MANLEY v. STATE.

No. 15068.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 16, 1932.

Earl M. Greer, of Wills Point, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for manufacturing intoxicating liquor; punishment being one year in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. In such condition, nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

I,  Edileen Salicrup, the acting chief financialofficer of ClearComm, L.P., certify that (i) the June 30, 2005 10-Q Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in theJune 30, 2004 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of ClearComm, L.P.

 

 
|   | /s/  Edileen Salicrup           |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   | Edileen  Salicrup               |   |
|   | Acting  Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   | August 23,  2005           |   |

 

----
Exhibit
      32.2








**Chief
      Financial Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Stephen J. Gilhooly, Executive Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operation of the Company.








Date: 
                August 9, 2007
            /s/
                Stephen J. GilhoolyStephen
                J. Gilhooly
              Executive
                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to TIB Financial Corp. and will be retained
      by
      TIB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
# C_2023186EN.01000601.xml

| 26.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/6

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107274

(2023/C 186/05)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 5.5.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107274 |
| Member State | Poland |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCTF: Pomoc dla producentów pszenicy |
| Legal basis | Par. 13zw of the Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 27 January 2015 on the detailed scope and manner of implementation of certain tasks of the Agency for Restructuring and Modernization of Agriculture (J.O., item 187, as amended) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 2 000 000 000 PLN |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Growing of cereals (except rice), leguminous crops and oil seeds |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Prezes Agencji Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa |
| Agencja Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa 03-822 Warszawa ul. Poleczki 33 |

Date of adoption of the decision

5.5.2023

Aid number

SA.107274

Member State

Poland

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCTF: Pomoc dla producentów pszenicy

Legal basis

Par. 13zw of the Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 27 January 2015 on the detailed scope and manner of implementation of certain tasks of the Agency for Restructuring and Modernization of Agriculture (J.O., item 187, as amended)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 2 000 000 000 PLN

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Growing of cereals (except rice), leguminous crops and oil seeds

Name and address of the granting authority

Prezes Agencji Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa

Agencja Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa 03-822 Warszawa ul. Poleczki 33

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Zones, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald P. McFadden,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      November 9, 2005








/S/
                RONALD P MCFADDENRonald
                P. McFaddenChief
                Financial Officer
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

CORE OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff

- Respondent

v.

JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., Defendant

- Petitioner

______________________

2022

- 120

______________________

On Petition for Permission to Appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1292(b) from the United States District
Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:21

- cv

02428

- VC, Judge Vince Chhabria.

______________________

ON PETITION

______________________

Before P ROST

, R EYNA and C UNNINGHAM

, Circuit Judges

.
C UNNINGHAM

, Circuit Judge

.
O R D E R

Juniper Networks, Inc. petitions for permission to appeal from an interlocutory order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California denying Juniper’s motion to dismiss, which the district court Case: 22-120 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 04/05/2022CORE OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES

, LLC v. JUNIPER NETWORKS

, INC

. 2

certified pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Core Optical Technologies, LLC opposes the petition.

Under § 1292(b), a district court may certify that an order that is not otherwise appealable is one involving a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and for which an immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. Ultimately, this court must exercise its own discretion in deciding whether to grant permission to appeal an interlocutory order. See I n re Convertible Rowing Exerciser Pat. Litig. , 903 F.2d 822, 822 (Fed. Cir. 1990). In this case, we conclude that we should not permit an interlocutory appeal.

Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

The petition for permission to appeal is denied.

April 5 , 2022
Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court Case: 22-120 Document: 16 Page: 2 Filed: 04/05/2022
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. DANNIE PAUL BOWLING III,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 23

- 1589 D.C. No. 2:22

- cr - 00080

- TOR

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 29, 2024 **
Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges

. Dannie Paul Bowling III appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 18

- year sentence imposed upon his guilty

- plea conviction for production and attempted production of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a), (e).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 5 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 23

- 1589

Bowling first contends that the district court failed to explain the sentence adequately

. He asserts that the court failed to address the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, and provided insufficient justification for its rejection of the parties’ joint recommendation for a sentence of 15 years and its denial of his request for a variance in light of future amendment s to U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1 . We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia

- Barragan , 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010) , and conclude there is none. The record shows that the court was aware of the parties’ sentencing recommendation and Bowling’s mitigating arguments, which it specifically acknowledged

. Its explanation that a sentence of 18 years was “su fficient but not greater than necessary to comply with the purposes and goals of sentencing” makes clear that it did not believe a lower sentence was justified under § 3553(a) notwithstanding the parties’ joint recommendation. See United States v. Carty , 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Moreover, t he
court expressly rejected Bowling’s request for a variance, explaining that the 18

- year sentence was below

- Guidelines even after considering the upcoming amendments to § 4A1.1

. Bowling also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because the 15

- year sentence recommended by the parties would have been sufficient. We review for abuse of discretion. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007) . The below

- Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable under3 23

- 1589

the totality of the circumstances and the § 3553(a) factors, including the nature of the offense and the need to protect the public. See Gall , 552 U.S. at 51.
AFFIRMED.