alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022168EN.01000801.xml

| 22.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/8

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine apply

(2022/C 168/07)

The attention of the data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

The legal bases for this processing operation are Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (2), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/660 (3), and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (4), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/658 (5).

The controller of this processing operation is the Department RELEX.1 in the Directorate-General for External Relations - RELEX of the General Secretariat of the Council (GSC), that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The GSC’s Data Protection Officer can be contacted at:

Data Protection Officer

data.protection@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2022/660, and Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/658.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Regulation (EU) No 269/2014.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the statement of reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions pursuant to Article 25 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, the exercise of the rights of the data subjects, such as the right of access and the right to rectification or to object, will be governed by the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.

Personal data will be retained for five years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

---

(1)  OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39.

(2)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(3)  OJ L 120, 21.4.2022, p. 11.

(4)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(5)  OJ L 120, 21.4.2022, p. 1.

---
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-07-00056-CV

______________________________

THOMAS VICTOR (TOM) RHODES, JR. AND JOSEPHINE ANN (JOSIE) 

 [LOPEZ] O'DELL, BOTH INDIVIDUALLY AND 

BOTH AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE

OF SHIENA RHODES, DECEASED, Appellants

V.

HONDA, GREENVILLE HONDA, ET AL., Appellees

 

On Appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 67,122

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Thomas Victor (Tom) Rhodes, Jr., and Josephine Ann (Josie) [Lopez] O'Dell, both

individually and as representatives of the estate of Shiena Rhodes, deceased, appealed from the trial

court's judgment against them and in favor of Honda, et al. 

The appellants claimed indigence and requested a free record. That indigence was contested

by both the district clerk and the court reporter. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(e). The trial court held

a hearing and determined the appellants were not indigent. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(i). That

determination was appealed in a separate appeal, cause number 06-07-00081-CV. Our opinion

upholding the trial court's decision in that case issued February 6, 2008, and, after the time passed

to appeal our ruling, our mandate issued June 27, 2008. We abated the current appeal until the issue

of indigence was determined.

On July 1, 2008, we issued an order in the current case, giving the appellants thirty days to

file the clerk's and reporter's records, and informing the appellants that, if the records were not filed

by that time, this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),

(c). It is now August 19, and those records have not been filed.
3

Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: August 19, 2008

Date Decided: August 20, 2008
**EXHIBIT31.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I,Tod A. Nestor, certify that:

 

1.                  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/Aof The Penn Traffic Company;

 

2.                  Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.                  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

 
|   | May 8, 2008 |                                                           | By:    |   /s/  Tod A. Nestor |
|--------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|   | Date                  |                                                           |   |   Tod  A. Nestor     |
|   |                  |   Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500
100 18 12 06 00 07/11 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 11 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.06 N 76.88 WMeters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001029317
<NAME>  National Account Systems Inc
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                       538
<INVENTORY>                                     42,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,205
<PP&E>                                          44,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,699
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,683
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### SADLER et al. v. KIRSCH.

No. 4312.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

March 23, 1933.

Ramey, Calhoun, Marsh & Higgins, of Tyler, for appellants.

Norman *&*Norman, of Rusk, and Smith-deal, Shook, Spence & Bowyer, of Dallas, for appellee.

SELLERS, Justice.

Harvey Kirsch brought this suit in the district court of Cherokee county against Millard Sadler and others in trespass to try title, and also alleged title under the ten years’ statute of limitation (Rev. St. 1925, art. 5510). The defendants answered by plea of not guilty, and also pleaded title to the land involved under the five and ten years’ statutes of limitation. The case was tried before the court without the aid of a jury, and at the conclusion of the evidence the court found in favor of the plaintiff, Harvey Kirsch, on his plea of ten years’ limitation, and accordingly entered judgment in his favor for the land involved." To this judgment the defendants excepted and have duly prosecuted this appeal.

 Appellants’ first proposition is that the appellee cannot recover on his plea of limitation since the evidence does not show that his title to the land involved ever passed out of the state of .Texas. We cannot agree with appellants’ contention. The evidence shows very clearly that the appellee was in possession of the land involved for more than ten years before this suit was filed, having it fenced, using and enjoying and claiming it as his own during all this time. Such possession alone carries with it the presumption that the state had parted with the title to some one and that the appellee had acquired that title. House v. Reavis, 89 Tex. 626, 35 S. W. 1063. This presumption placed the burden on appellants to show that the state had not parted with its title in order to defeat the case made by appellee, and this they have failed to do. Harmon et al. v. Landers (Tex. Civ. App.) 41 S. W. 378.

Careful examination of the evidence convinces us that appellants’ second assignment of error must be overruled, the evidence, in our opinion, being sufficient to support the trial court’s finding of adverse possession of appellee to the land.

The judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Anabelle L. Chua,
Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge, that our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our financial condition and results of operations.

March 26, 2015



/s/    Anabelle L.
ChuaANABELLE L. CHUA
Senior Vice President and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-19-2024]

On May 9, 2024, Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (dba SpaceX) submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within FTZ 50, in Hawthorne, California.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (89 FR 42423, May 15, 2024). On September 6, 2024, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including section 400.14.                

Dated: September 6, 2024.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-20562 Filed 9-10-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### FITTS v. GRAND LODGE BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY TRAINMEN.

No. 12957.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

Nov. 13, 1339.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 2, 1933.

Houtchens & Houtchens and J. H. Craik, all of Fort Worth, for appellánt

Phillips, Trammell, Chizum, Price & Estes, Kenneth H. Jones, and Clayton L. Om, all of Fort Worth, for appellee.

*435LATTIMORE, Justice.

This is on motion to dismiss this appeal for want of notice of appeal given in the trial court The transcript does not show notice given.

Affidavits of appellant and his counsel recite that the trial court instructed a verdict for appellee, that at the time such verdict was received the appellant’s attorney stated to the court that plaintiff gives notice of appeal to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District of Texas. This is controverted by affidavits of counsel for appellee. No entries appear on court’s trial docket, and the trial judge had no recollection of having heard said notice of appeal given.

While -we doubt not the power and duty of this court, under article 1822, R. S., to receive testimony by affidavit of jurisdictional facts, such as this: Western Union v. O’Keéfe, 87 Tex. 423, 28 S. W. 945, we observe that that case, as well as those many eases since decided upon that authority, were those in which some documentary evidence existed of such notice given. We are not warm to inviting contests of affidavits which initiation of a policy such as is invoked by appellant would provoke. An honest record on appeal is a badge of a fair trial judge. This court will go far and speedily to see that a litigant gets such a record, but that does not mean that such extension is available to him who has not been diligent in availing himself of his rights in the trial court. Here the appellant actually had some ten days within which to see that notice of appeal was shown in the records of the trial court. Not then or until this motion is made is the matter given attention by him.

Moreover, where the fact must be presented to us on appeal wholly out of the conflicting memories of those present, and in the absence of any showing suggesting reprehensible conduct on the part of the trial judge, we must “be satisfied” (O’Keefe Case, supra); that is, a clear showing must be made before we can deny the verity which the records of the trial court import.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR BILLING
INFORMATION CONCEPTS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          30,456
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,666
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,650
<PP&E>                                          19,769
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,923
<BONDS>                                          5,525
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           152
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,629
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,818
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,958
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,922
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,011
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,911
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,911
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             412
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,392
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (118)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,949
<PP&E>                                           4,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,791
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,478
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,476
<SALES>                                          8,550
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,550
<CGS>                                            7,368
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,406)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,406)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,406)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
#### Ayres et al., Appellees, *v.*Cook et al., Appellants. 

(No. 28807

Decided December 10, 1941.)

*Messrs. Vorys, Safer, Seymour & Pease*and *Mr. Lyman Brownfield,*for appellees.

*Mr. PL. W. Bradshaw*and *Mr. W. B. McLeskey,*for appellant, William E. Cook.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.
(1)
    
    Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-7231 and 33-64097) pertaining to the Oxford
Industries, Inc. 1992 Stock Plan,(2)
    
    Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-113000 and 333-59411) pertaining to the Oxford
Industries, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan,(3)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-59409) pertaining to the Oxford Industries, Inc.
1997 Restricted Stock Plan,(4)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-121538) pertaining to the Oxford Industries, Inc.
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan,(5)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-121535) pertaining to the Oxford Industries, Inc.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan,(6)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-119263) pertaining to the registration of 485,243
shares of Oxford Industries, Inc. Common Stock,(7)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-130010) pertaining to the Oxford Industries, Inc.
Deferred Compensation Plan,(8)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-130009) pertaining to the registration of 485,243
shares of Oxford Industries, Inc. Common Stock,(9)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-110598) pertaining to the registration of 776,400
shares of Oxford Industries, Inc. Common Stock;