alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR BILLING
CONCEPTS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          42,826
<SECURITIES>                                         4
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                       138
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               144,120
<PP&E>                                          25,778 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,240
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          115,526
<BONDS>                                          2,805
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           331
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,288
<SALES>                                          3,654
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,237
<CGS>                                            2,750
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   125
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,878
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,640 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,238 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,238  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12 
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022267EN.01000201.xml

| 12.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10205 – ORANGE / CDC / EDF / OC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 267/02)

On 25 August 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10205. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10205. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### DALLAS JOINT STOCK LAND BANK OF DALLAS v. FORSYTH.

No. 1698-6948.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section B.

Jan. 19, 1938.

For former opinion, see 109 S.W.2d 1046.

McCombs, Andress & Johnson and James A. Kilgore, all of Dallas, for plaintiff in error.

P. C. Fewell and Olin E. Nesmith, both of Dallas, for defendant in error.

MARTIN, Commissioner.

We have concluded that the condition of this record is such as to make it inadvisable to here render and enter judgment in any amount. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court and that of the Court of Civil Appeals are both reversed, and the cause remanded to the trial court with instructions to enter judgment according to the holding of the original opinion.

Except as indicated, the motion for rehearing is overruled. ,

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the quarterly  report of New Century Equity Holdings
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  I, Steven J.
Pully,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge that:

     (1)  The Form 10-Q report for the quarter  ended June 30, 2006,  filed with
          the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on August 14,  2006,  fully
          complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the Form 10-Q  report for the  quarter
          ended June 30, 2006 fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
          financial  condition and results of  operations of New Century  Equity
          Holdings Corp.

By: /s/ Steven J. Pully                            Date:  August 14, 2006
    -----------------------------                         -------------------
    Steven J. Pully
    Chief Executive Officer
```
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 20 1 5 - 2 466 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 20 1 5 - CE - 0 1 8 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
#### BALCH v. STATE.

No. 18542.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 12, 1936.

A. C. Chaney, of Cleburne, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for robbery; punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

The alleged injured party testified that appellant took from his person, by means of an assault and threats, a sum of money. We see no merit in appellant’s contention that because said injured party thought that he was being assaulted with a pistol, when in fact it turned out to be that the weapon used was an ice pick, the conviction cannot stand. The assault with the ice pick appears to have been as effective in the accomplishment of the robbery as a pistol wouid have been. The robbery being by force as a result of an assault, and no weapon having been named in the indictment, we .are constrained to hold against appellant in this contention.

We find two bills of exceptions in the record, one complaining that after the testimony for the defense had been introduced, the State was permitted to recall the prosecuting witness and have him detail before the jury his denial of certain facts testified to by defendant’s witnesses, the appellant claiming that such denial was merely a reiteration of the facts testified to by the witnesses in chief. We see no abuse of the discretion of the trial court in the matter.

The other bill of exceptions is merely appellant’s complaint of the overruling of his motion for new trial. There were no issues of fact raised in connection with the motion for new trial, which merely complained because of alleged errors of procedure in the introduction of witnesses.

Being unable to agree with appellant’s contentions, and concluding the evidence sufficient, the judgment will be affirmed.
# C_2023195EN.01000501.xml

| 2.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/5

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107303

(2023/C 195/04)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 12.5.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107303 |
| Member State | Greece |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCTF: Κρατικές ενισχύσεις στον αγροτικό τομέα και ειδικότερα στους τομείς των αχλαδιών, του κρόκου (σαφράν), του καπνού, της κορινθιακής σταφίδας, των σπαραγγιών και των μελισσοκομικών προϊόντων (κυρίως προϊόντων μελιού) πανελλαδικά |
| Legal basis | Απόφαση των Υπουργών Οικονομικών και Αγροτικής Ανάπτυξης για ‘Χορήγηση ενίσχυσης σε παραγωγούς αχλαδιών, καπνού, κρόκου, σπαραγγιών, κορινθιακής σταφίδας και μελισσοκομικών προϊόντων σε όλη την Επικράτεια και λεπτομέρειες εφαρμογής με βάση την Ανακοίνωση αριθμ. C(2023) 1711 final/9.3.2023 της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής (Προσωρινό Πλαίσιο)’ |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 30 854 570 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | ΥΠΑΑΤ-ΓΕΝΙΚΗ ΔΙΕΥΘΥΝΣΗ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΩΝ ΥΠΗΡΕΣΙΩΝ |
| ΜΕΝΑΝΔΡΟΥ 22, ΑΘΗΝΑ |

Date of adoption of the decision

12.5.2023

Aid number

SA.107303

Member State

Greece

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCTF: Κρατικές ενισχύσεις στον αγροτικό τομέα και ειδικότερα στους τομείς των αχλαδιών, του κρόκου (σαφράν), του καπνού, της κορινθιακής σταφίδας, των σπαραγγιών και των μελισσοκομικών προϊόντων (κυρίως προϊόντων μελιού) πανελλαδικά

Legal basis

Απόφαση των Υπουργών Οικονομικών και Αγροτικής Ανάπτυξης για ‘Χορήγηση ενίσχυσης σε παραγωγούς αχλαδιών, καπνού, κρόκου, σπαραγγιών, κορινθιακής σταφίδας και μελισσοκομικών προϊόντων σε όλη την Επικράτεια και λεπτομέρειες εφαρμογής με βάση την Ανακοίνωση αριθμ. C(2023) 1711 final/9.3.2023 της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής (Προσωρινό Πλαίσιο)’

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 30 854 570 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

ΥΠΑΑΤ-ΓΕΝΙΚΗ ΔΙΕΥΘΥΝΣΗ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΩΝ ΥΠΗΡΕΣΙΩΝ

ΜΕΝΑΝΔΡΟΥ 22, ΑΘΗΝΑ

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
### aon9N Ia. amA. *-RNKY OENERAL June24, 1975

The Honorable Tom Hanna Opinion No. H-632 Criminal District Attorney Ra: Authority of a municipal utility Jefferson County P. 0. Box 2553 district to contract Hiitha,priVite Beaumont, Texas 77704 party tohaul garbage andto charge the party therefor Dear Mr. Hanna:

You have requested our opinion regarding the authority of amunicipal utility district to contract with a private party tohaul garbage andto charge the party therefor. We assume, of course thatthis service will be offered to all persons similarly situated.

A municipal utility district is empowered by section 54. 201(b) ofthe Texas Water Code:

to purchase, construct, acquire, own, operate, maintain, repair, improve, or extend insfde andoutside its boundaries any andall works, improvements, facilities, plants, equipment, andappliances necessary to accomplish thepurposes of its creation, including all works, improvements, facilities, plants, equipment, andappliances incident, helpful, or necessary to:

. . . . (2) collect, transport, process, dispose of, andcontrol all domestic, industrial, or communal wastes whether influid, solid, or composite state
. . . Insection 54.203, a district is authorized to:

purchase, construct, acquire, own, operate, maintain, repair, improve, and extend a solid waste collection and disposal system inside and outside the district and make proper charges for it,--

The Honorable Tom Hanna - Page 2 (H-632)

Finally, section 54.204(a) provides that:

[a] district may adoptand enforce all necessary charges, fees, or rentals, in addition totaxes, for providing any district facilities or service. The hauling anddisposal of garbage is a permissible function of a municipal utility district byvirtue of sections 54. 201(b) and 54.203. The district may make necessary charges for this service pursuant to sections 54.203 and 54.204(a). Itis thus our opinion thatamunicipal utility district may contract with aprivate party to haul garbage andmay charge theparty therefor. SUMMARY

A municipal utility district is authorized to contract with aprivate party to haul garbage ,andto charge the party therefor. Very truly yours,

Opinion Committee

pm2793
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 15






               LETTER RE: UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Aetna Inc.
Hartford, Connecticut

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: Registration Statements No. 333-07169, 333-08427, 333-08429, 333-08431,
333-52321, 333-68881, 333-52321-01, 333-52321-02, 333-52321-03, 333-52321-04,
and 333-52321-05.

With respect to the Registration Statements filed by Aetna Inc. or its
Subsidiaries, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report
dated October 27, 1999 and February 7, 2000 as to Note 2, related to our review
of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



                                                  /s/  KPMG LLP


Hartford, Connecticut
February 15, 2000
# C_2022427EN.01001301.xml

| 9.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/13

---

EUROPEAN ASYLUM SUPPORT OFFICE

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2021

(2022/C 427/13)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://euaa.europa.eu/about-us/governance-and-internal-control

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      31,201,000
<SECURITIES>                                10,040,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,978,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 5,474,000
<INVENTORY>                                 66,799,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           148,934,000
<PP&E>                                      67,747,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              25,965,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             196,033,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       44,293,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       118,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 137,959,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               196,033,000
<SALES>                                    444,766,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           452,441,000
<CGS>                                      300,495,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              154,955,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,088,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,097,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (5,216,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,119,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,119,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23-a



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  statement
     (Form S-3 No.  333-37513) of Pacific Bell and in the related  Prospectus of
     our  report  dated  February  20,  1998,  with  respect  to  the  financial
     statements  and  schedules of Pacific Bell  included in this Annual  Report
     (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.




                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP



     San Antonio, Texas
     March 10, 1998
AS Boilers - Document Control Numbers regarding limited-use boilers

Mary Johnson to

:

Higgins, Cortney

Cc

:

RobertJ Wayland, Jim Eddinger, Jonathan Averback

From: Mary Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Jonathan Averback/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Thursday, 10/25/2012 3:12 PM

Cortney,

Per your request, see below for Document Control Numbers for comment letters regarding limited-use 

boilers with respect to the Area Source Boiler Rule.

Document Control Number: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0790-2443 (comment letter from Council of Industrial 

Boiler Owners (CIBO))

Document Control Number: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0790-2424 (comment letter from Dominion)

Document Control Number: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0790-2448 (comment letter from The Clean Energy 

Group)

Thanks.

Mary

Mary Johnson

Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Mail Code D 243-01

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-5025

Fax: (919) 541-5450
# C_2023105EN.01000201.xml

| 21.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 105/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 105/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11024 – GEODIS INTERNATIONAL / TRANS-O-FLEX EXPRESS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 105/02)

On 17 February 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11024. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11024. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---