alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,788
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,328
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,612)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,343
<PP&E>                                           2,761
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (513)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,320
<BONDS>                                             29
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,411
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,027
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 174<F1> 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,199)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,199)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>(A) INTEREST EXPENSE ONLY
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 2015-CE-007-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection - Rudder 

Cable Block (LH 

and RH)

1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 5 $ 425.00

Reinforcement -

Rudder Cable 

Block (LH and RH)

2.0 $ 170.00 $100 $ 270.00 5 $1,350.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1,775

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): The block 

repair and the reinforcement noted in the EASA AD are the same. All of the gliders will require 

the reinforcement at some point. If a crack is found during the inspection, then the action must be 

accomplished before the next flight. If cracks are not found, then the reinforcement will need to be 

accomplished within 12 months after the effective date of the AD. 

The material cost estimate includes two layers of fiberglass and the required adhesive. There is no 

warranty recovery available from the manufacturer for these actions. 

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: The AD only affects 5 US registered aircraft.

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
**EXHIBIT 31(b)****RULE 13A – 14(A)/15D – 14(A) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Henry G. Schopfer, Chief Financial Officer of Peerless Mfg. Co., certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Peerless Mfg. Co.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.        Date:  September 27, 2006 /s/ Henry G. Schopfer, III   Henry G. Schopfer, III    Chief Financial Officer
# C_2023004EN.01000101.xml

| 6.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10980 – TOKYU / MARUBENI / ORIX / FUJITSU / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 4/01)

On 13 December 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10980. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10980. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of SUBMICRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, inthe capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 

Dated: November 10, 2011

 

/s/ Charles Stidham

 

Name: Charles Stidham

Title: Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Dated: November 10, 2011

 

/s/ Charles Stidham

 

Name: Charles Stidham

Title: Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2979 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2979

To allow the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to provide greater 
                     protection to servicemembers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2015

Ms. Duckworth (for herself, Mr. Ellison, Mrs. Lawrence, Mr. Israel, Mr. 
   Takai, Mr. Hinojosa, Ms. Norton, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Capuano, Mr. 
     Cicilline, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Mr. Kildee, Ms. Judy Chu of 
 California, and Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To allow the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to provide greater 
                     protection to servicemembers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Consumer Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION.

    Section 1002(12) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 
(12 U.S.C. 5481(12)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (Q), by striking ``; and'' and 
        inserting a semicolon;
            (2) in subparagraph (R), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(S) sections 101, 107 (except with respect to 
                bailments), 108 (except with respect to insurance), 201 
                (except with respect to child custody proceedings), 
                207, 301, 302, 303, 305, and 305A of the Servicemembers 
                Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 511, 517, 518, 521, 
                527, 531, 532, 533, 535, and 535a).''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Each of the undersignedhereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Channell CommercialCorporation (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best ofhis knowledge:

 

•                  The QuarterlyReport of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

•                  The informationcontained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| Date:   August 15, 2005 |                     |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                              |                     |   |   |
|                              |
| /s/ William H. Channell, Jr.      |                     |
| Name:                             | William H. Channell, Jr. |
| Title:                            | Chief Executive Officer  |
|                              |
|                              |                     |   |   |
| /s/ Jerry Collazo                 |                     |
| Name:                             | Jerry Collazo            |
| Title:                            | Chief  Financial Officer |
|                                   |                          |  |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         520,170
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  126,430
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,137
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               655,530
<PP&E>                                         869,104
<DEPRECIATION>                                 106,221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,219,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          268,354
<BONDS>                                      1,394,721
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           415
<OTHER-SE>                                     556,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,219,768
<SALES>                                        313,695
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               313,695
<CGS>                                          219,523
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  219,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               155,727
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              72,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (109,644)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (109,644)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (109,644)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1








Chief Executive Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, R. Eugene Taylor, Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Date:           May 16, 2011
/s/ R. Eugene TaylorR. Eugene Taylor

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to TIB Financial Corp. and will be retained by TIB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

HOMER A. STILLWELL, III; ELIZABETH 

ROBERTSON, MARGUERITE H. 

BENSON, ADAM LEIGHTON, III, AND 

BLACK MOUNTAIN OPERATING, LLC,

Appellants,

v.

JOHN F. STEVENSON, BORDEN W. 

STEVENSON, JOAN PIRIE LECLERC, 

JOHN T. PIRIE, SOPHIE H. PIRIE, BLAKE 

OIL AND GAS CORPORATION, MDJ 

MINERALS, L.L.P., WADE P. KOEHL, 

AND AOG PERMIAN PARTNERS, LTD.,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00131-CV

Appeal from the

143rd Judicial District Court

of Reeves County, Texas

(TC# 21-06-24028-CVR)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and remand the cause for further 

proceeding consistent with this Court’s opinion. We further order that Appellants recover from 

Appellees all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

            In  connection  with the  quarterly  report  of New  Century  Equity
Holdings Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John
P.  Murray,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to the best of my knowledge that:

(1)         The Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, filed with
            the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on August 16, 2004,  fully
            complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
            Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         The  information  contained  in the Form 10-Q report for the quarter
            ended June 30, 2004 fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the
            financial  condition and results of operations of New Century Equity
            Holdings Corp.

By:  /s/ John P. Murray                          Date:  August 16, 2004
   ----------------------                               ---------------
John P. Murray
Chief Financial Officer
```
## NO. 12

- 17

- 00122

- CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:
HEATHER ESTERS,

RELATOR §

§

§ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Heather Esters filed an original mandamus proceeding complaining of the trial court’s February 3, 2017 order granting Melinda Warner’s motion for new trial. On October 18, 2017, this Court conditionally granted Esters’s petition and directed Respondent to vacate his February
3 order and render judgment on the jury’s verdic t. By a judgment signed on October 25, 2017, and an order signed on November 3, 2017, Respondent has complied with this Court’s opinion and order, rendering this proceeding moot. Accordingly, we dismiss Esters ’s petition for writ of
mandamus as moot

. Opi nion delivered November 15 , 2017. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

NOVEMBER 15 , 2017

NO. 12

- 17

- 00122

- CV

HEATHER ESTERS, Relator V.

HON. CLAY J. GOSSETT , Respondent

O RIGINAL P ROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Heather Esters; who is the relator in Cause No. 2015

- 215, pending on the d ocket of the 4th
Judicial District Court of Rusk County , Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been
filed herein on April 14, 2017, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the writ should not issue , it is therefore CONSIDER ED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby
dismissed as moot

.

By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.