alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

INOCENCIO PENA-ROMERO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-70699

Agency No. A097-762-960

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 

Inocencio Pena-Romero, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. §1252. We review for substantial evidence

FILED

JUN 09 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-70699

the BIA’s continuous physical presence determination. Gutierrez v. Mukasey, 521

F.3d 1114, 1116 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review. 

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Pena-Romero

did not meet the continuous physical presence requirement because he testified that

he accepted voluntary departure in 1996, thereby interrupting his accrual of

continuous physical presence in the United States. See id. at 1117-18;

Vasquez-Lopez v. Ashcroft, 343 F.3d 961, 974 (9th Cir. 2003) (per curiam). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 281 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 281

To prohibit recovery of damages in certain wrongful birth and wrongful 
              life civil actions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2015

 Mr. Palazzo (for himself, Mr. Harper, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Pittenger, Mr. 
 Olson, Mr. Jones, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Marino, Mr. Pompeo, Mr. 
   Pitts, and Mr. Rothfus) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit recovery of damages in certain wrongful birth and wrongful 
              life civil actions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Every Child is a Blessing Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF RECOVERY IN CERTAIN WRONGFUL LIFE AND WRONGFUL 
              BIRTH CIVIL ACTIONS.

    (a) General Rule.--Except as otherwise provided in this section, a 
person may not recover damages in any designated civil action (as 
defined in subsection (d)) based on a claim that, but for the conduct 
of the defendant, a child, once conceived, would not or should not have 
been born.
    (b) Application to Certain Claims.--Subsection (a) applies, among 
others, to a claim based in whole or in part on disability, defect, 
abnormality, race, sex, or other inborn characteristic of the child.
    (c) Rule of Construction.--Subsection (a) shall not be construed--
            (1) to provide a defense against charges of intentional 
        misrepresentation in any proceeding under State law regulating 
        the professional practices of health care providers and 
        practitioners;
            (2) to provide a defense in any criminal action, including 
        cases of rape or incest; or
            (3) to limit the recovery of damages in cases where the 
        conduct of the defendant caused personal injury or death to the 
        child or gestational mother.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``State'' includes the District of Columbia, 
        the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any other territory or 
        possession of the United States; and
            (2) the term ``designated civil action'' means a civil 
        action, in Federal or State court--
                    (A) arising under Federal law; or
                    (B) based on a claim involving health care services 
                affecting interstate or foreign commerce.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7

<CIK>                         0001013564
<NAME>                        Farm Family Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           223,181
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          9,563
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            9,565
<EQUITIES>                                     8,078
<MORTGAGE>                                     1,725
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 247,969
<CASH>                                         3,886
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             10,401
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         10,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 326,763
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                143,205
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            58,143
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 11,261
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          110,802
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                1,293
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       53
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   326,763
<PREMIUMS>                                     34,973
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            4,416
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (90)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 220
<BENEFITS>                                     24,697
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    10,090
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,668
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,612
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,056
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,056
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.58
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 114,383
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            24,847
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (150)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             4,588
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               16,900
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                117,592
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        


</TABLE>
# ORIGINA1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23-0420 RASTA KHALID WALID,

Plaintiffand Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE,

Defendants and Appellees. ORDER

Appellant Rasta Khalid Walid was granted an extension oftime to file and serve his opening briefon or before May 7, 2024. Walid did not thereafter file the opening briefand on June 5, 2024, this Court ordered that Walid file the opening brief no later than July 3, 2024. Nothing further has been filed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to all parties ofrecord. DATED this 

# MD day ofJuly, 2024.



# FILED JUL 16 2024 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court Stata of Monts na iefJustice



# /4-6/-2-, 07/16/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0420
1

Motion GRANTED AND Order filed March 5, 2018. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00151-CV

____________

IN RE DISCOVERY DRILLING PTE. LTD, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-18964

ORDER

On February 27, 2018, relator Discovery Drilling PTE. Ltd, filed a petition 

for writ of mandamus in this court. Relator asks this court to order the Honorable 

Larry Weiman, Judge of the 80th District Court, in Harris County, Texas, to vacate 

his order dated December 20, 2017, which denied relator’s motion to dismiss based 

on a forum-selection clause or alternatively, based on forum non conveniens.
2

Relator also has filed a motion for temporary stay asking this court to stay the 

trial set for March 12, 2018, and the hearing on attorney’s fees set for March 23, 

2018, pending a decision on the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 

52.8(b), 52.10. 

It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relator’s request 

for relief requires further consideration and that relator will be prejudiced unless 

immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relator’s motion and 

issue the following order:

We ORDER the trial set for March 12, 2018, and the hearing on attorney’s 

fees set for March 23, 2018, STAYED until a final decision by this court on relator’s 

petition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this court.

In addition, the court requests Spencer Ogden, Inc., the real party-in-interest, 

to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before March 16, 2018.

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.4.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Jamison.

(J. Jamison voted to deny the motion for stay)
**EXHIBIT31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, Gregory J. Young,certify that:

 

1.                    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof The Penn Traffic Company;

 

2.                    Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.                    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

 
| Date: May 8, 2008 | By:    |  /s/ Gregory J.  Young                  |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                   |   |  Gregory J. Young                       |
|                   |   |  President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
BIOANALYSIS CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
OCTOBER 2, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                                 29,655
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          66,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                            45,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      166,755
<PP&E>                                                 39,130
<DEPRECIATION>                                         15,064
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        399,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  90,138
<BONDS>                                                25,707
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  181
<OTHER-SE>                                            215,222
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          399,565
<SALES>                                               205,088
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      205,088
<CGS>                                                  95,499
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          95,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       17,162
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        1,008
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      4,402
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        19,248
<INCOME-TAX>                                            7,579
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    11,673
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           11,673
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.62


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME OF
J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JANUARY 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                             287
<SECURITIES>                                     1,073
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                       135
<INVENTORY>                                      6,191
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,366
<PP&E>                                           8,274
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,945
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,978
<BONDS>                                          6,986
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        526
<COMMON>                                         2,766
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,363
<SALES>                                         29,482
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,410
<CGS>                                           21,294
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   734
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   307
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 584
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    925
<INCOME-TAX>                                       359
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                566
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       566
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.10


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 187 (Thursday, September 26, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 78836-78837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21934]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 173

[Docket No. FDA-2023-F-2319]


PHM Brands; Withdrawal of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notification; withdrawal of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing the 
withdrawal, without prejudice to a future filing, of a food additive 
petition (FAP 2A4832) proposing that the food additive regulations for 
chlorine dioxide be amended to provide for an additional method for 
producing the additive.

[[Page 78837]]


DATES: The food additive petition was withdrawn on March 4, 2024.

ADDRESSES: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the 
docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document into 
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts, and/or go to the Dockets 
Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Hall, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., 
College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-9195.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice published in the Federal 
Register of June 21, 2023 (88 FR 40122), we announced that we had filed 
a food additive petition (FAP 2A4832), submitted by Burdock Group 
Consultants on behalf of PHM Brands, 730 17th Street, Denver, Colorado 
80202. The petition proposed to amend the food additive regulations in 
Sec.  173.300 (21 CFR 173.300 Chlorine dioxide) to provide for 
production of the additive via an electrolytic method from a brine 
solution containing chloride salts. PHM Brands has now withdrawn the 
petition without prejudice to a future filing (21 CFR 171.7).

    Dated: September 20, 2024.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-21934 Filed 9-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20386 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OLAJIDE ODUNAYO SOLOYE, also known as Darryl Parker, also known as Patrick Fielder, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CR-138-1

- - - - - - - - - - November 25, 1998 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Olajide Odunayo Soloye appeals the order of restitution imposed upon him at sentencing after pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit bank fraud and bank fraud. We find that the district court’s failure to mention restitution during the plea colloquy was harmless error. See United States v. Johnson , 1 F.3d 296, 298 (5th Cir. 1993)(en banc). Soloye’s plea agreement stated that he may be required to make full restitutionfor the losses sustained by the victims of the offenses of

conviction. At his guilty plea hearing, Soloye affirmed that he had read and understood the plea agreement. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence of the district court are affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6995

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. RONNIE VICTOR EVERETT , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville

. W. Earl Britt , Senior District Judge. ( 4:12

- cr - 00130

- BR

- 1; 4:17

- cv - 00080

- BR )

Submitted : December 28, 2018 Decided: January 9, 2019

Before THACKER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Ronnie Victor Everett, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ronnie Vi ctor Everett seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate o f appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on pro cedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Everett has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materi als before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
7900 Hickman Road, Suite 1 / Windsor Heights , Iowa 5032 4 515

- 242

- 5100 FAX 515

- 242

- 5094 www.IowaCleanAir.gov November 25 , 2015

Mark Hague Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 7 c/o Air Planning and Development Branch
11201 Renner Blvd. Lenexa, Kansas 66219

Re: SIP revision request

Dear Mr. Hague :

The Iowa Department of Natural Resources requests revisions to the Iowa State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the enclosed Polk County Board of Health Rules and Regulations

– Chapter V (Air Pollution).

The Polk C ounty Board of Supervisors (the Board) adopted the enclosed amendments on October 6 , 2015, af ter the public hearing and public board meetings. The Board has full legal authority to develop rules pursuant to Section 455B of the Iowa Code. The Board and Polk
C ounty followed all applicable administrative procedures in propo sing and adopting these rules. Enclosed are the required submittal elements for determination of plan completeness per 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V.

The notice of public hearing was publish ed in The Des Moines Register on September 4, 2015 and September 21, 2015

. No written or oral comments were provided during the comment period that extended from September 1, 2015, through October 6, 2015. The Board made no changes to
the final rules from what was proposed. The effective date of these adopted amendments is
October 12 , 2015

. Copies of the a ffidavit s of publication are enclosed.

The Iowa Department of Natural Resources requests that the Environmental Protection Agency
amend the SIP to include the changes made to the Polk County

- Air Quality Division

r egulations

. The requested change to the SIP includes Article I throug h Article X

, including definitions, insof ar as they pertain to the SIP. Additionally, Items 3

- 6 (pertaining to Arti cle VI and Article VIII) are specifically excluded from this request

.2 If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Christine Paulson at (515) 725

- 9510

.

Sincerely,

Chuck Gipp
Director Iowa Department of Natural Resources

Enclosures: Affidavits of publication

, final changes to Polk County regulations

, Board signature

page s, and final Polk County Board of Health Rules and Regulations (Chapter V

- Air Pollution) (effective October 12, 2015)

cc: Heather Hamilton, EPA Region 7 , with enclosures

– by email