alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 280 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 280

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 2015

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to recoup bonuses and 
    awards paid to employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO RECOUP BONUSES OR AWARDS PAID TO EMPLOYEES OF 
              DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 7 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 715. Recoupment of bonuses or awards paid to employees of 
              Department
    ``(a) Recoupment.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary may issue an order directing an employee of the Department to 
repay the amount, or a portion of the amount, of any award or bonus 
paid to the employee under title 5, including under chapters 45 or 53 
of such title, or this title if--
            ``(1) the Secretary determines such repayment appropriate 
        pursuant to regulations prescribed under subsection (c); and
            ``(2) before such repayment, the employee is afforded 
        notice and an opportunity for a hearing conducted by another 
        department or agency of the Federal Government.
    ``(b) Review.--A decision regarding a repayment by an employee 
pursuant to subsection (a)(2) is final and may not be reviewed by any 
department or agency or any court.
    ``(c) Regulations.--The Secretary shall prescribe regulations to 
carry out this section.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is further amended by adding at the end the following new 
item:

``715. Recoupment of bonuses or awards paid to employees of 
                            Department.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--Section 715 of title 38, United States Code, 
as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to an award or 
bonus paid by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to an employee of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (d) Construction.--Nothing in this Act or the amendments made by 
this Act may be construed to modify the certification issued by the 
Office of Personnel Management and the Office of Management and Budget 
regarding the performance appraisal system of the Senior Executive 
Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 2, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### GIRAUD et ux. v. RESERVE REALTY CO.

No. 9815.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

April 15, 1936.

Rehearing Denied May 20, 1936.

D. A. McAskill and H. G. Williams, both of San Antonio, for appellants.

Buck & Lattimore, of Fort Worth, for appellee.

MURRAY, Justice.

This suit was instituted by R. G. Giraud and wife, Beatrice Giraud, against the Reserve Realty Company, seeking to recover lot 11, block 19, New City block 153S, in the city of San Antonio. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to appellants’ petition, and upon their refusal to amend dismissed the cause.

This appeal is by the Girauds from the judgment of dismissal.

Appellants’ petition shows on its face that they seek to recover this lot under and by virtue of a certain agreed judgment entered in a prior suit. The petition further discloses that, under the terms of said agreed judgment, appellants were given an exclusive option to purchase this lot for the sum of $2,500; this option to expire October 1, 1933. The judgment further provided, in effect, that when the Girauds had paid the sum of $2,500 into the registry of the court for the credit of appellee, the appellee should be allowed ten days within which to furnish all necessary evidence of title. The petition further alleged that appellants tendered to the clerk of the court below, prior to October 1, 1933, a personal check, upon a local bank, but indorsed upon said check a provision that same was not to be paid until the title to the lot was cleared, which check was not accepted by the clerk of the court or by the appellee. Appellants allege an oral understanding to the effect that the title to the property would have to be cleared before they would be able to raise the $2,500, as they could only raise the money by using the land as security therefor. This alleged oral agreement is in conflict with the provisions of the judgment, and therefore was properly disregarded by the trial judge.

It is clear from the allegations of appellants’ petition that, under the provisions of the agreed judgment, the Girauds were required to pay into the registry of the court the sum of $2,500, before it was necessary for the appellee to clear the title to the lot in question. The tender of the check, indorsed as it was, did not meet the requirement of the judgment that $2,500 *199must first be paid into the registry of the court. Appellants, not having done that which was required of them by the plain provision of the judgment, were in no position to complain of the failure of appel-lee to clear the title to the lot, and are therefore not entitled to recover the lot under the allegations of their petition. The trial judge properly sustained a general demurrer thereto.

Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed.
RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT





Exhibit 10(b)

RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT

ENERGEN CORPORATION 1997 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

Dated as of _________,______



 

An Award of Restricted Stock is hereby granted to the below named Participant.  This Award is granted under the Energen Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan ("the Plan"), dated November 25, 1997, as amended, and is subject in all respects to the terms and provisions of the Plan which is incorporated herein by reference.  Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, this Award is subject to the transferability restrictions and forfeiture provisions set forth in the Plan.  Words defined in the Plan and used in this Agreement shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan.  The attributes of this Award are as follows:





	Participant:Name



2)Number of Restricted Shares:Shares



3)Date of Grant:______________



4)Vesting:  Restrictions on the Restricted Shares shall lapse [100% on specified date / in increments on specified dates].



5)Additional terms and conditions:[None / specified additional conditions].

 



 

ENERGEN CORPORATION



 

By                                                                        



Its_______________________________



 

The Participant hereby accepts this Restricted Stock Award and agrees to accept as binding, conclusive, and final all decisions and interpretations of the Committee and/or the Board, upon any questions arising under the Plan.



 

                                                                                      

Participant - Name
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000739

30-JUN-2014

08:19 AM
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3025 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a criminal penalty for 

launching drones that interfere with fighting wildfires affecting Federal 

property, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2015 

Mr. COOK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a criminal 

penalty for launching drones that interfere with fighting 

wildfires affecting Federal property, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wildfire Airspace Pro5 tection Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3025 IH

1 SEC. 2. LAUNCHING DRONES THAT INTERFERE WITH 

2 FIGHTING WILDFIRES AFFECTING FEDERAL 

3 PROPERTY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 65 of title 18, United 

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘§ 1370. Launching drones that interfere with fight8 ing wildfires affecting Federal property 

9 ‘‘(a) OFFENSE.—Except as provided in subsection 

10 (b), whoever knowingly launches a drone in a place near 

11 a wildfire that threatens the real or personal property of 

12 the United States, or of any department or agency thereof, 

13 and is reckless as to whether that drone will interfere with 

14 fighting the fire, if the drone does interfere with that fire15 fighting, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not 

16 more than 5 years, or both. 

17 ‘‘(b) DEFENSE.—It is a defense to a prosecution for 

18 an offense under this section that the drone was launched 

19 by a firefighter or other public safety officer acting in the 

20 course of official duty.’’. 

21 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

22 for chapter 65 of title 18, United States Code, is amended 

23 by adding at the end the following new item: 

‘‘1370. Launching drones that interfere with fighting wildfires affecting Federal 

property.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          23,615
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  345,443
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,567
<INVENTORY>                                    161,193
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               604,825
<PP&E>                                       6,046,068
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,628,043
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,307,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          918,268
<BONDS>                                      2,038,921
<COMMON>                                        43,507
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     792,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,307,776
<SALES>                                      2,385,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,489,986
<CGS>                                        1,537,737
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,577,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               776,264
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             194,348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (477,675)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (172,533)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (305,142)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (305,142)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.60)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023242EN.01000401.xml

| 7.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/4

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107150

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 242/03)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 19.6.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107150 |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | DIRECT GRANTS TO COMPANIES RELYING ON SUPPLY FROM URKAINE, RUSSIA AND BELARUS AFFECTED BY THE CURRENT CRISIS — 2023 |
| Legal basis | DIRECT GRANTS TO COMPANIES RELYING ON SUPPLY FROM URKAINE, RUSSIA AND BELARUS AFFECTED BY THE CURRENT CRISIS — 2023 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 600 000 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 600 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale |
| Piazzale della Farnesina 1 — 00135 Roma — Italia |

Date of adoption of the decision

19.6.2023

Aid number

SA.107150

Member State

Italy

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

DIRECT GRANTS TO COMPANIES RELYING ON SUPPLY FROM URKAINE, RUSSIA AND BELARUS AFFECTED BY THE CURRENT CRISIS — 2023

Legal basis

DIRECT GRANTS TO COMPANIES RELYING ON SUPPLY FROM URKAINE, RUSSIA AND BELARUS AFFECTED BY THE CURRENT CRISIS — 2023

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 600 000 000 EUR

Annual budget: 600 000 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale

Piazzale della Farnesina 1 — 00135 Roma — Italia

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1273

HALLIE N. STONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusSULLIVAN’S AUTO BODY, (Trading as) its assignees, and for successors in interest; RICHARD L. SULLIVAN, JR., Owner, individually in his private capacity; JOHN RICE, Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-483-A) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 21, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hallie N. Stone, Appellant Pro Se. Richard L. Sullivan, Jr., JohnRice, Fredericksburg, Virginia, Appellees; Mary Gillen Fenske, KALBAUGH, PFUND & MESSERSMITH, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Hallie N. Stone appeals the district court’s orders (1) dismissing her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, (2) denying her motion for reconsideration and to amend her complaint,(3) denying her motion for “a rule to show cause why [the Defendants’ attorney] should not be held in criminal contempt.” Our review of the record and the district court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stone v. Sullivan’s Auto Body , No. CA-97-483-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 5, 1997; Jan . 9 & Jan. 16, 1998). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                PEERLESS MFG. CO.
                         2002 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





         In connection with the Annual Report of Peerless Mfg. Co. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sherrill Stone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended, and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.




                                       /s/ Sherrill Stone
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Sherrill Stone
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       September 26, 2002



         This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




                                       53
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Zones, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
        for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald P. McFadden, Chief
        Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1)           The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 
 (2)           The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
        August 13, 2007
 
 
 /S/   RONALD
                  P MCFADDENRonald
                  P. McFaddenChief
                  Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6184
KEVIN M. LUCK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SERGEANT CHILDRESS, Danville City; DOCTOR ALIBANZA; NURSE TURNER; NURSE STAPP, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00726-JLK) Submitted: July 19, 2007 Decided: July 24, 2007 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin M. Luck, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Kevin M. Luck appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Luck v. Childress , No. 7:06-cv-00726-JLK (W.D. Va. Jan. 4, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2022044EN.01002501.xml

| 28.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/25

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA Relevance)

(2022/C 44/10)

| Member State | Ireland |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Aerfort Chonamara – Árainn
  Aerfort Chonamara – Inis Meáin – Inis Oírr |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 7 June 2022 |
| Address where the text and any information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained | For further information please contact:
  Colm Mac Donncha,





  Rannóg na n-Oileáin, |
| An Roinn Forbartha Tuaithe agus Pobail |
| Na Forbacha, |
| Co. na Gaillimhe, |
| ÉIRE |
| H91 KX39 |

Member State

Ireland

Routes concerned

Aerfort Chonamara – Árainn

Aerfort Chonamara – Inis Meáin – Inis Oírr

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

7 June 2022

Address where the text and any information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained

For further information please contact:

Colm Mac Donncha,

Rannóg na n-Oileáin,

An Roinn Forbartha Tuaithe agus Pobail

Na Forbacha,

Co. na Gaillimhe,

ÉIRE

H91 KX39

Teileafón: +353 858743881

Ríomhphost: colm.macdonncha@drcd.gov.ie

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          35,697
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                       767
<INVENTORY>                                      4,556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,575
<PP&E>                                         407,687
<DEPRECIATION>                                 104,795
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 372,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,111
<BONDS>                                        176,960
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,233
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   372,314
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,066
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,299
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,336
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,013
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,323
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (27,007)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,684)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>