alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 573 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3004 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

JULY 14, 2016 

Reported by Ms. MURKOWSKI, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To amend the Gullah/Geechee Cultural Heritage Act to extend the authorization for the Gullah/Geechee Cultural 

Heritage Corridor Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE 

4 GULLAH/GEECHEE CULTURAL HERITAGE 

5 CORRIDOR COMMISSION. 

6 Section 295D(d) of the Gullah/Geechee Cultural Her7 itage Act (Public Law 109–338; 120 Stat. 1833; 16 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3004 RS

1 U.S.C. 461 note) is amended by striking ‘‘10 years’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘15 years’’. 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS

emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 573 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3004 

AN ACT 

To amend the Gullah/Geechee Cultural Heritage 

Geechee Cultural Heritage Corridor Commission. Act to extend the authorization for the Gullah/ 

JULY 14, 2016 

Reported without amendment 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
# C_2023130EN.01000101.xml

| 14.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11031 – HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY / KIESEL / EAC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 130/01)

On 30 March 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11031. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11031. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 183 (Friday, September 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 77105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21577]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XE285]


South Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (Council) will 
hold a meeting of its Scientific and Statistical Committee's Social and 
Economic Panel (SEP).

DATES: The meeting will be held via webinar on October 7, 2024, from 9 
a.m. until 12:30 p.m. Registration is required. Webinar registration, 
an online public comment form, and briefing book materials will be 
available two weeks prior to the meetings at: https://safmc.net/scientific-and-statistical-committee-meeting/.

ADDRESSES: 
    Council address: South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 4055 
Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, N. Charleston, SC 29405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christina Wiegand, Fishery Social 
Scientist, SAFMC; phone: (843) 571-4366 or toll free: (866) SAFMC-10; 
fax: (843) 769-4520; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e2818a908b91968b8c83cc958b8785838c86a29183848f81cc8c8796"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e5d564c574d4a57505f1049575b595f505a7e4d5f58535d10505b4a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SEP meeting agenda includes an update on 
Council active amendments and discussion of modifications to the 
Southeast For-Hire Integrated Electronic Reporting (SEFHIER) Program. 
Overall compliance with the reporting program is low compared to that 
previously observed the Gulf of Mexico. The Council has begun 
discussion on ways to improve compliance, strengthen reporting 
requirements, and explore data validation, with the goal of utilizing 
the information being collected in future management decisions. As 
these discussions continue, the Council is asking for input from the 
SEP.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for auxiliary aids should be directed to the Council office 
(see ADDRESSES) 5 days prior to the public meeting date.

    Note:  The times and sequence specified in this agenda are 
subject to change.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: September 17, 2024.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-21577 Filed 9-19-24; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard Beyer, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Freescale Semiconductor
Holdings I, Ltd., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 3, 2009 (the Quarterly Report), which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I,
Ltd.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.

Dated: April 24, 2009



/s/ RICHARD BEYERRichard BeyerChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I, Ltd.
<PAGE>
 
                                                         PS GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

PRESS RELEASE


PS GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. ANNOUNCES SPECIAL CASH DISTRIBUTION


   SAN DIEGO, CA, AUGUST 8, 1997 - PS Group Holdings, Inc. (PSGH) reported its
directors approved a special cash distribution of $1.50 per common share to
shareholders of record on August 18, 1997. The special distribution will be paid
by check mailed on August 28, 1997. This distribution is a special distribution
and should not be interpreted as the adoption of a continuing policy.

   Since this special distribution will be received by stockholders in 1997, it
will be treated as a 1997 distribution for income tax reporting purposes. PSGH
believes that there is a possibility that a part of this distribution may
constitute a return of capital and will not be taxable as a dividend. The final
treatment, in part, will be based upon operating results for the entire year
ending December 31, 1997. The 1997 Form 1099's advising as to taxability of this
August 18, 1997 special distribution will be issued in January 1998. As with all
other tax matters, these calculations are subject to review by the Internal
Revenue Service. Stockholders should consult their tax advisors with respect to
this special distribution.

PSGH Common Stock Transfer Restrictions
---------------------------------------

   Effective with the holding company reorganization on June 5, 1996, certain
restrictions were imposed on the transfer of common shares of PSGH. In general,
and subject to an exemption for certain dispositions of shares by persons who
were "pre-existing 5% shareholders" (as defined in PSGH's Restated Certificate
of Incorporation ) on June 5, 1996, the transfer restrictions prohibit, without
prior approval of the Board of Directors, the direct or indirect disposition or
acquisition of any stock of PSGH by or to any holder who owns, or would, as a
result thereof, own (either directly or through the tax attribution rules) 5% or
more of the stock upon such acquisition. These restrictions have been imposed in
order to help preserve PSGH's substantial net operating loss and investment tax
credit carry forwards and other tax benefits by decreasing the risk of an
"ownership change" for federal income tax purposes.

                                       ###

              CONTACT: LAWRENCE A. GUSKE, PS GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.
                                 (619)642-2982
# C_2023130EN.01000301.xml

| 14.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11023 – ADP / JCDECAUX / MEDIA AEROPORTS DE PARIS JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 130/03)

On 30 March 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11023. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11023. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

Assigned on Briefs August 9, 2005

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KERVIN MERCEL COLLINS

 Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County

No. 2003-B-1536 Mark J. Fishburn, Judge

No. M2004-01995-CCA-R3-CD - Filed January 31, 2006

DAVID G. HAYES, J., dissenting.

The majority concludes that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to grant a

mistrial. I respectfully dissent. The majority opines that trial counsel’s overreaching remarks made

during his opening statement, informing the jury that it was the victim who first struck the defendant,

so tilted the scales of justice as to require the granting of a mistrial for reasons of manifest necessity.

See generally Millbrooks, 819 S.W.2d at 443; Zimmerman, 823 S.W.2d at 226.

Appellate review of a trial court’s decision to grant or deny a motion for mistrial must take

into account the trial court’s greater advantage in assessing the trial proceeding over which the trial

judge is presiding. Thus, a motion for mistrial is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court

and is not to be granted except for manifest necessity. Reid, 91 S.W.3d at 279. For this reason , an

appellate court’s review should provide considerable deference to the trial court’s ruling in

determining whether an occurrence or event at trial has so prejudiced the defendant or the State as

to preclude a fair and impartial verdict. Williams, 929 S.W.2d at 388. The decision of the trial court

is, therefore, reversible only if there has been an abuse of discretion. Reid, 91 S.W.3d at 279.

Here, the trial judge heard the erroneous remark made during the opening statement of trial

and was able to observe and assess its impact upon the jury once the jury learned the statement was

erroneous. Clearly, in this regard, the trial court was in the best position to determine if the jury

would be biased by the statement, thus, precluding an impartial verdict. 

Trial counsel’s erroneous statement that the victim was the first aggressor was but an isolated

piece of evidence in an otherwise overwhelming presentation of proof that the defendant was indeed

the aggressor. Accordingly, I find that even if trial counsel had not mis-characterized the proof

during his opening statement, the outcome at trial would not have been different.

Because I find no abuse of discretion, I would affirm the judgment of the trial court.

____________________________________

DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of Belarus Capital Corp. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Sanford Leavitt,
      Chief Executive Officer, and Neil Roth, Chief Financial Officer, certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1)
      This
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Sanford Leavitt
            
            /s/
                Neil RothSanford
                Leavitt
              Chief
                Executive Officer
            
            Neil
                Roth
              Chief
                Financial OfficerDate:
                May 14, 2008
            
            Date:
                May 14, 2008
EXHIBIT 23(iii)

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp.
Danboro, Pennsylvania:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Penn Engineering
& Manufacturing Corp. and subsidiaries (the "Company's") as of December 31, 1996
and the related statements of consolidated income, changes in consolidated
stockholders' equity and consolidated income, changes in consolidated
stockholders' equity and consolidated cash flows for each of the two years in
the period ended December 31, 1996. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on the audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 1996 and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years
in the period ended December 31, 1996 in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, during 1996 the
Company changed its method of accounting for last-in, first-out inventories.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
January 29, 1997
# C_2023283EN.01013101.xml

| 11.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/131 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/131

---

P9_TA(2023)0043

Protocol to the EC/Korea Cooperation Agreement on a Civil Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS): accession of Bulgaria, Croatia and Romania

European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 February 2023 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol to the Cooperation Agreement on a Civil Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Croatia and Romania to the European Union (06739/2019 — C9-0366/2022 — 2018/0429(NLE))

(Consent)

(2023/C 283/26)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (06739/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (06739/2019),

| — | having regard to the draft Protocol to the Cooperation Agreement on a Civil Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Croatia and Romania to the European Union (06756/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Protocol to the Cooperation Agreement on a Civil Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Croatia and Romania to the European Union (06756/2019),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 172 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0366/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 172 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0366/2022),

| — | having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4), Rule 114(7) and Rule 52(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4), Rule 114(7) and Rule 52(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A9-0006/2023), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A9-0006/2023),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the conclusion of the Protocol to the Cooperation Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Korea. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
ex414.htm


    Exhibit
4.14

     

     

     

    
      	 	 	 	
              36 St George
      Street,

            
	 	 	 	
              Mayfair

            
	 	 	 	
              London WIS
      2FW

            
	 	 	 	
              T +
      44(0) 20
      33013358

            
	corporate finance limited	 	 	
              F +
      44(0) 20
      7529
      1402

            


    

     

     

    
    

    


     

    The
Directors

    Geo
Genesis Group Ltd

    Rockefeller
Center

    1230 Ave.
of the Americas, 7th floor


    New York,
NY 10020

     

    For the
attention of Roger Bendelac, Esq.

     

    September
1, 2008

     

     

    Dear
Sirs,

     

    Further
to our engagement letter dated April 18, 2008, we are please to confirm the
agreed increase in Orange Corporate Finance's fee in the amount of an additional
£10,000 to £30,000 annually payable quarterly in advance from September 2008 in
relation to annual retainer as PLUS corporate advisor.

     

    Yours
faithfully

     

     

    John
Bridges

    Director

    For and
on behalf of Orange Corporate Finance Ltd

     

    Agreed
and accepted for an on behalf of Geo Genesis Group Ltd

     

    
       

    

     

    
      By           

    

     

    


    Roger
Bendelac

    Date                    

    Director
March 21, 2012

The Honorable Ray LaHood U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Alaska Airlines’ application for SAN-DCA, Docket No. D OT-OST-2012-0029.

Dear Secretary LaHood:

I, Jay Alexander, fully support the application of Alaska Airlines for air service between San Diego a nd Washington Reagan National Airport (DCA). San Dieg o is the largest region without direct service to D CA. Additionally, due to the profound community of interest between San Diego a nd the nation’s capital, the region generates the largest passenger market dem and without nonstop service to the convenient and close-in airport serving our nation’s capitol

. San Diego’s sheer market size to Washington coupled with the fact that San Diego to Dulles average airfares are the highest of west coast cities, shou ld qualify for the limited slots available for this flight. The high airfare is exacerbated when factoring in taxi fares from Dulles to Washington’s city center that average about $60 each way. This means travelers between W ashington’s city center and San Diego via Dulles can pay on average close to $400 one-way.

There are also countless other San Diego-based and W ashington-based businesses that are engaged in health science, telecommunications, and national de fense that need quick and convenient access to Reagan National Airport. The firm I work for, Jones Lang LaSalle, has offices in Washington DC and has need for additional nonstop air service to our nati on’s capital. Alaska Airlines service would add a needed nonstop option to a primary gateway to Washington, DC. I join with the San Diego County Regional Airpo rt Authority, the San Diego Regional Economic Developm ent Corporation, the World Trade Center San Diego, and the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commer ce in support of Alaska Airlines’ application for San Diego – Washington Reagan National slots.

We thank the Department of Transportation for the op portunity to comment on the above referenced docket and we hope to hear of a favorable review of Alaska Airlines’ San Diego – DCA proposal soon.

Sincerely,

Jay Alexander, SIOR Managing Director
858.410.1188
License no. 01019910 Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. 4747 Executive Drive Suite 400 San Diego California 92121 tel +1 858 410 1200 fax +1 858 410 1201