alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered December 5, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 00811

- CR

CHAZMON MONTREL BLAC KSHEAR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from t he 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 11

- 58305

- M



### O RDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.
On September 16, 2016, we ordered the trial court to hold a hearing to determine why the
reporter’s record had not been filed. On Nov ember 29, 2016, the reporter’s record was filed. In
the interest of expediting this appeal and because findings are no longer necessary, we VACATE
that portion of the September 16, 2016 order requiring the trial court hold a hearing and make
findings.

We ORDER the reporter’s record filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022142EN.01002001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/20 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10630 – BLACKSTONE / VISTA / CAMPUSLOGIC HOLDINGS)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 142/08)

1.

On 17 March 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022142EN.01002001-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Blackstone, Inc. (‘Blackstone’, USA) |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Vista Equity Partners Management, LLC (‘Vista’, USA) |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | CampusLogic Holdings, Inc. (‘CampusLogic’, USA) |

Blackstone and Vista acquire within the meaning of Articles 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of CampusLogic.

The concentration is accomplished by way of acquisition of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Blackstone: global asset management and investment firm, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Vista: investment firm that manages a portfolio of companies focused on empowering and growing enterprise software, data and technology-enabled businesses, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for CampusLogic: provider of student financial success software solutions for higher education students to navigate the financial aid lifecycle with an institution. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022142EN.01002001-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10630 – BLACKSTONE / VISTA / CAMPUSLOGIC HOLDINGS

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022142EN.01002001-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022142EN.01002001-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

WI-FI ONE, LLC,

Appellant

v.

BROADCOM CORPORATION,

Appellee

______________________ 

2015-1946

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-

00636.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

DOUGLAS AARON CAWLEY, McKool Smith, PC, Dallas, 

TX argued for appellant. Also represented by DONALD 

PUCKETT, Nelson Bumgardner PC, Fort Worth, TX; PETER 

J. AYERS, Lee & Hayes, PLLC, Austin, TX.

DOMINIC E. MASSA, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and 

Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by KATIE SAXTON, KEVIN GOLDMAN, ZACHARY 

PICCOLOMINI. 

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 16, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 4315** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JEMALL ROBERT BLYTHE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. James C. Dever III , Chief District Judge. ( 5:13

- cr - 00206

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : March 8, 2016 Decided: March 22, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Sarah Jessica Farber, FARBER LAW FIRM, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this ci rcuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jemall Robert Blythe appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his probation and sentencing him to 11 months’ imprisonment. C ounsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that s he has foun d no meritorious grounds for appeal but questioning whether the sentence was substantively reasonable
. Blythe was advised of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, but has not done

so. We review a sentence imposed on revocation of probation under the same standard as a sentence imposed on revocation of supervised release. United States v. Moulden , 478 F.3d 652, 655 (4th Cir. 2007). “A district court has broad discretion when imposing a [revocation] sentence.” United States v. Webb , 738 F.3d 638, 640 (4th Cir. 2013). “ We will affirm a revocation
sentence if it is within the statutory maximum and is not

‘ plainly unreasonable. ’” Id. In conducting this review, we assess the sentence for reasonableness, utilizing “the procedural and substantive considerations” employed in evaluating an original criminal sentence. United States v. Crudup , 461 F.3d 433, 438 (4th Cir. 2006). Only if a sentence is unreasonable will we “then decide whether the sentence is plainly unreasonable.” Id. at 439. A sentence is presumed reasonable if it is within a range properly calculated under3 Chapter Seven of the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual. Webb , 738 F.3d at 642. We hold that Blythe has failed to rebut the presumption that his within

- range sentence is reasonable
. In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record for any meritorious grounds for appeal and have found
none. Accor dingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment
. This c ourt requires that counsel inform Blythe , in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the Uni ted States for further review. If Blythe requests that a petition be filed, but counsel beli eves that such a petition would be frivolous, counsel may move in this c ourt for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Blythe. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conte ntions are adequately presented in the materials before this c ourt and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
# Official Journal L 241/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 241 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 598 September 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 241

English edition

Legislation

Volume 598 September 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1447 of 26 August 2016 establishing a network code on requirements for grid connection of high voltage direct current systems and direct current-connected power park modules (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1447 of 26 August 2016 establishing a network code on requirements for grid connection of high voltage direct current systems and direct current-connected power park modules (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Zones, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Firoz H. Lalji,
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      November 9, 2005




/S/
                FIROZ H LALJIFiroz
                H. LaljiChairman
                and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2022139EN.01000301.xml

| 29.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/3

---

Update of reference amounts for the crossing of the external borders, as referred to in Article 6(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code)

(2022/C 139/03)

The publication of reference amounts for the crossing of the external borders, as referred to in Article 6(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code), is based on the information communicated by the Member States to the Commission in conformity with Article 39 of the Schengen Borders Code.

In addition to the publication in the Official Journal, a monthly update is available on the website of the Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs.

REFERENCE AMOUNTS REQUIRED FOR THE CROSSING OF THE EXTERNAL BORDER FIXED BY NATIONAL AUTHORITIES

ESTONIA

Replacement of the information published in OJ C 178, 28.5.2020, p. 3.

Under Estonian law, aliens arriving into Estonia without a letter of invitation, shall upon request by a border guard official upon entry into the country provide proof of sufficient monetary means to cover the costs of his/her stay in and departure from Estonia. Sufficient monetary means for each allowed day is considered to be 0,2 times the monthly minimum salary implemented by the Government of the Republic, i.e. 130.80 EUR.

Otherwise the person inviting shall assume responsibility for the costs of the alien’s stay in and departure from Estonia.

List of previous publications

OJ C 247, 13.10.2006, p. 19.

OJ C 77, 5.4.2007, p. 11.

OJ C 153, 6.7.2007, p. 22.

OJ C 164, 18.7.2007, p. 45.

OJ C 182, 4.8.2007, p. 18.

OJ C 57, 1.3.2008, p. 38.

OJ C 134, 31.5.2008, p. 19.

OJ C 331, 31.12.2008, p. 13.

OJ C 33, 10.2.2009, p. 1.

OJ C 36, 13.2.2009, p. 100.

OJ C 37, 14.2.2009, p. 8.

OJ C 98, 29.4.2009, p. 11.

OJ C 35, 12.2.2010, p. 7.

OJ C 304, 10.11.2010, p. 5.

OJ C 24, 26.1.2011, p. 6.

OJ C 157, 27.5.2011, p. 8.

OJ C 203, 9.7.2011, p. 16.

OJ C 11, 13.1.2012, p. 13.

OJ C 72, 10.3.2012, p. 44.

OJ C 199, 7.7.2012, p. 8.

OJ C 298, 04.10.2012, p. 3.

OJ C 56, 26.2.2013, p. 13.

OJ C 98, 05.04.2013, p. 3.

OJ C 269, 18.09.2013, p. 2.

OJ C 57, 28.2.2014, p. 2.

OJ C 152, 20.5.2014, p. 25.

OJ C 224, 15.7.2014, p. 31.

OJ C 434, 4.12.2014, p. 3.

OJ C 447, 13.12.2014, p. 32.

OJ C 38, 4.2.2015, p. 20.

OJ C 96, 11.3.2016, p. 7.

OJ C 146, 26.4.2016, p. 12.

OJ C 248, 8.7.2016, p. 12.

OJ C 111, 8.4.2017, p. 11.

OJ C 21, 20.1.2018, p. 3.

OJ C 93, 12.3.2018, p. 4.

OJ C 153, 2.5.2018, p. 8.

OJ C 186, 31.5.2018, p. 10.

OJ C 264, 26.07.2018, p. 6.

OJ C 366, 10.10.2018, p. 12.

OJ C 459, 20.12.2018, p. 38.

OJ C 140, 16.4.2019, p. 7.

OJ C 178, 28.5.2020, p. 3.

OJ C 102, 24.3.2021, p. 8.

OJ C 486, 3.12.2021, p. 26.

---
Exhibit 10.66




Exhibit 10.66 



SECOND AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT OF SALE AND
PURCHASE 





        THIS
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT OF SALE AND PURCHASE (this “Second
Amendment”) is entered into as of the 18th day of October,
2004, by and between MACK-CALI TEXAS PROPERTY L.P., a Texas limited partnership
(“Seller”), and CENTENNIAL ACQUISITION COMPANY, a Texas corporation, and
WARAMAUG ACQUISITION CORP., a Texas corporation (collectively,
“Purchaser”). 



        A.              Seller
and Purchaser entered into that certain Agreement of Sale and Purchase           dated as
of August 10, 2004, as amended by that certain Amendment to Agreement           of Sale
and Purchase between Seller and Purchaser dated as of October 12,           2004 (as
amended to date, the “Purchase           Agreement”). All
capitalized terms used but not defined           herein shall have the meaning given such
terms in the Purchase Agreement.  




        B.              Seller
and Purchaser now desire to amend the Purchase Agreement as set forth           below.  




        NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, Seller and Purchaser agree as follows: 



        1.    Evaluation
Period.   The expiration of the Evaluation Period           is hereby
extended to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on October 20, 2004.  




        2.    Reaffirmation.  
Except as modified by this Second Amendment,           the Purchase Agreement is hereby
ratified and confirmed and in full force and           effect. In the event of a conflict
between the terms of this Second Amendment           and the Purchase Agreement, the
terms of this Second Amendment shall control.  




        3.    Counterparts.  
This Second Amendment may be executed in any           number of counterparts, all of
which taken together will constitute one and the           same Second Amendment, and the
signature page of any counterpart may be removed           therefrom and attached to any
other counterpart. This Second Amendment shall be           legally binding upon receipt
by each party of the facsimile or the original           signature of Seller and of
Purchaser.  




      [SIGNATURES
FOLLOW ON NEXT SUCCEEDING PAGE]














        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Second Amendment as of the day and year
first above written. 



			PURCHASER:

CENTENNIAL ACQUISITION COMPANY

By:  /s/ Steven H. Levin

——————————————
Name:  Steven H. Levin
Title:  President












			WARAMAUG ACQUISITION CORP.


By:  /s/  Cindy Nelson

——————————————
Name:  Cindy Nelson
Title:  Vice President












			SELLER:

MACK-CALI TEXAS PROPERTY L.P.


By:  Mack-Cali Sub XVII, Inc., its general partner



      By:  /s/  Roger W. Thomas
      ———————————
      Name:  Roger W. Thomas

      Title:  Executive Vice President
                   and General Counsel








2
# C_2022245EN.01001101.xml

| 28.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/11

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran apply

(2022/C 245/06)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

The legal basis for this processing operation are Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP (2), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1019 (3), and Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 (4), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1010 (5).

The controller of this processing operation is the Department RELEX.1 of the General Secretariat of the Council (GSC), that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The GSC’s Data Protection Officer can be contacted at:

Data Protection Officer

data.protection@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Decision 2010/413/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2022/1019, and Regulation (EU) No 267/2012, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1010.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in Decision 2010/413/CFSP and Regulation (EU) No 267/2012.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the statement of reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions pursuant to Article 25 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, the exercise of the rights of the data subjects such as the right of access, as well as the rights to rectification or to object will be answered in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Without prejudice to any judicial, administrative or non-judicial remedy, data subjects may lodge a complaint with the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 (edps@edps.europa.eu).

---

(1)  OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39.

(2)  OJ L 195, 27.7.2010, p. 39.

(3)  OJ L 170, 28.6.2022, p. 85.

(4)  OJ L 88, 24.3.2012, p. 1.

(5)  OJ L 170, 28.6.2022, p. 17.

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022395EN.01001001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 14.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/10 |

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 395/09)

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Sweden |
| Concerned routes | | | | | --- | --- | | | Arvidsjaur–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Gällivare–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Hagfors–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Hemavan–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Kramfors-Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Lycksele–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Pajala–Luleå | | | | | --- | --- | | | Sveg–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Torsby–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Vilhelmina–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | | Östersund–Umeå | | | | | --- | --- | | | Mora – Stockholm/Arlanda | |
| Period of validity of the contract | 27 October 2023 – 26 October 2027 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 2 months from publication of this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the pubic tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained | Web address for more information about the tender: Procurements Swedish Transport Administration For further information please contact: Swedish Transport Administration Phone : 0771 921921 Int. Phone : +46 771921921 Contact person: Lisa Berglund Email: lisa.a.berglund@trafikverket.se | | | --- | | Address : Trafikverket | | 781 89 Borlänge | | SWEDEN | Internet: www.trafikverket.se |

---
Abatement Order filed September 3, 2020. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00865-CV

____________

GREEN VALLEY PLACE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT 

ASSOCIATION D/B/A GREEN VALLEY ESTATES, CIA AND 

JACQUELINE JOHNSON, REGINALD JOHNSON, LINDA 

WILLIAM, JESSE PATRICK, KAREN ROBINSON, AND DERRICK 

REED, Appellants

V.

DEBRA DE SHAZOR AND JOHNNY DE SHAZOR, Appellees

On Appeal from the 458th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 17-DCV-243730A

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellees have filed three unopposed motions to extend time to file their 

brief because the parties have settled. We issue the following order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 
parties file a motion to dismiss the appeal or other dispositive motion. The court 

will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by any party, 

or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Bourliot.