alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.75



2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN





ADDENDUM

TO

STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT



                        The following provisions are hereby incorporated into, and are hereby made a part of, that certain Stock Option Agreement (the "Option Agreement") by and between Borland Software Corporation (the "Corporation") and [_________] ("Optionee") evidencing the stock option (the "Option") granted to Optionee under the terms of the Corporation's 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, and such provisions are effective immediately. All capitalized terms in this Addendum, to the extent not otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Option Agreement.



SPECIAL ACCELERATION



                        1.          To the extent the Option is assumed in connection with a Change in Control or otherwise continued in effect or replaced with a substitute option, the Option (or such substitute option) shall not accelerate to any extent upon the occurrence of that Change in Control, and the Option (or such substitute option) shall accordingly continue, over Optionee's period of Service after the Change in Control, to become exercisable for the Option Shares in one or more installments in accordance with the provisions of the Option Agreement.  However, upon termination of Optionee's Service other than for [Misconduct/Cause] (as such term is defined in Optionee's offer letter) or upon Optionee's  [Involuntary Termination/Constructive Termination] (as such term is defined in Optionee's offer letter) within twelve (12) months following a Change in Control, then the Option (or such substitute option), to the extent outstanding at the time but not otherwise fully exercisable, shall automatically accelerate so that the Optionee shall be credited with an additional twelve (12) months of Service for purposes of the Vesting Schedule and such Option (or substitute option) may be exercised for any or all of those accelerated Option Shares (or other securities) as fully-vested shares, together with any other Option Shares (or other securities) for which the Option has already become vested and exercisable in accordance with the normal Vesting Schedule.



                        2.          In the event of any conflict, ambiguity, or inconsistency between the provisions of the Option Agreement and the provisions of this Addendum, to the extent possible such provisions will be interpreted so as to resolve any such conflict, ambiguity, or inconsistency, and if that is not possible, the provisions of the this Addendum will prevail.



                        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borland Software Corporation has caused this Addendum to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of the Effective Date specified below.





	 	
BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION

	 	 
	 	 
	 	
By:

	 	 
	 	
Title:

	


 
	 
	
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 28, 2014

s0421

Order 

Clerk

April 28, 2014

148359

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148359

COA: 317711

Gogebic CC: 2012-000231-FC

RANDY ROBERT ERICKSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 15, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit (11)
                           
                       OWENS CORNING AND SUBSIDIARIES
                           
                      COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                           
             FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
                           
<TABLE>
<S>                                       <C>        <C>          <C>
Basic:
                                              1997        1996       1995
                                   (In millions of dollars, except share data)

Net income (loss)                          $    47    $   (284)    $     231

Basic weighted average number of 
  common shares outstanding (thousands)     52,860      51,349        48,744
Basic per share amount                     $   .89    $  (5.54)    $    4.73

Diluted:

Net income (loss)                          $    47    $   (284)    $     238
Weighted average number of shares
 outstanding (thousands)                    52,860      51,349        48,744
Weighted average common equivalent
 shares (thousands):
 Deferred awards                               352           -           423
 Stock options using the average market
   price during the period                     334           -           379
 Shares from assumed conversion
  of debt                                        -           -         1,562
 Shares from assumed conversion
  of preferred securities                        -           -         2,810

Diluted weighted average number
  of common shares outstanding and
  common equivalent shares (thousands)      53,546      51,349        53,918

Diluted per share amount                   $   .88    $  (5.54)     $   4.41


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 18**

February 26, 2013 

Pentair Ltd. 

Freier Platz 10 

8200 Schaffhausen 

Switzerland 

Dear Sirs/Madams: 

We have audited the financial statements of Pentair Ltd. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and for each of the three years in the period endedDecember 31, 2012, included in your Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued our report thereon dated February 26, 2013, which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatoryparagraph concerning the Company’s election to change its methods of accounting for defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans costs during 2012. Note 3 to such financial statements contains a description of the adoptionduring the year ended December 31, 2012 of changes in accounting principles for determining the market related value of plan assets from a calculated value method to a fair value method and for recognizing actuarial gains and losses for allpension and other post-retirement benefit plans from an amortization method to immediate recognition. In our judgment, such changes are to alternative accounting principles that are preferable under the circumstances. 

Yours truly, 

/s/ Deloitte &Touche LLP 

Minneapolis, Minnesota
|    |                                                                                                                                  |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Electronic Arts Inc. for the periods presented therein. |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |
| /s/ John S. Riccitiello |
| John S. Riccitiello     |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| Electronic Arts Inc.    |
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

MICHAEL GUILLORY

VERSUS

STATE OF LOUISIANA, THROUGH

THE DEPARTMENT OF

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

NO. 2021 CW 1621

FEBRUARY 25, 2022

In Re: The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality and

The Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, 

applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District

Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 705981. 

BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., PENZATO AND HESTER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

VGW

CHH

Penzato, J., dissents. The amending petition seeking a

declaratory judgment filed by plaintiff, Patrick Keith, tails to

state a cause of action against relators, the Louisiana

Department of Environmental Quality and the Louisiana Department

of Natural Resources as the allegations set forth therein do not

raise claims that fall within the purview of La. Const. art. 12, 

10, which waives sovereign immunity from suits for injury to

person or property. Accordingly, I would reverse the district

court' s judgment and sustain relators' exception of no cause of

action but afford Patrick Keith an opportunity to amend his

petition, if he can, to state a cause of action against

relators. See La. Code Civ. P. art. 934. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

i

DEPUTY LERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
#### REESE v. STATE.

No. 19358.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 2, 1938.

H. L. Lewis, Jr., of Navasota, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for possessing distilled liquor not in a container with affixed stamp, punishment being a fine of $100.

The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
# C_2023276EN.01000301.xml

| 4.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/3

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.102428

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 276/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 21.6.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.102428 |
| Member State | Hungary |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCTF — RRF: Aid for energy storage facilities for the integration of weather variable renewable energy sources |
| Legal basis | Modification of Act Nr. LXXXVI and implementing acts |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Energy infrastructures, Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 436 000 000 000 HUF |
| Intensity | 100,0  % |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2025 |
| Economic sectors | Electric power generation, transmission and distribution |
| Name and address of the granting authority | RRF National Authority |
| 1077 Budapest, Wesselényi 20-22 |

Date of adoption of the decision

21.6.2023

Aid number

SA.102428

Member State

Hungary

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCTF — RRF: Aid for energy storage facilities for the integration of weather variable renewable energy sources

Legal basis

Modification of Act Nr. LXXXVI and implementing acts

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Energy infrastructures, Environmental protection

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 436 000 000 000 HUF

Intensity

100,0  %

Duration

Until 31.12.2025

Economic sectors

Electric power generation, transmission and distribution

Name and address of the granting authority

RRF National Authority

1077 Budapest, Wesselényi 20-22

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA

---
_______________________________________ __ _____________ _______________ _____________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 24, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 129341 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. IN RE PETITION BY TREASURER OF Stephen J. Markman, WAYNE COUNTY FOR FORECLOSURE Justices

WAYNE COUNTY TREASURER, Petitioner, and

MATTHEW TATARIAN and MICHAEL KELLY, Intervening Parties-Appellants,

v SC: 129341 COA: 261074 Wayne CC: 02-220192-PZ PERFECTING CHURCH, Respondent-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e July 11, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties are DIRECTED to include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the trial court retained jurisdiction to grant relief from the judgment of foreclosure pu rsuant to MCR 2.612(C), notwithstanding the provisions of MCL 2 11.78l(1) and (2); and (2) whether MCL 211.78l permits a person to be deprived of property without being affo rded due process. Persons or groups interested in the determina tion of the questions presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

d0221 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 24, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit 10.6

nStor Technologies, Inc.

October 31, 2004

Cenvill Recreation, Inc.1601 Forum PlaceSuite 500West Palm Beach, Florida  33417Attn:  Mark F. Levy

Dear Mr. Levy:

We have agreed to the following amendments to that certain Promissory Note, dated December 31, 2003, in the amount of $2,194,124 (the “Note”), as amended on April 30, 2004 increasing the outstanding principal ofthe Note to $2,252,154, as amended on July 31, 2004 increasing the outstanding principal of the Note to $2,297,443, with a maturity date of October 31, 2004 (“Amended Note”), payable by nStor Technologies, Inc. to Cenvill Recreation, Inc., copies of whichare attached hereto. 

1)   The maturity date of the Amended Note is hereby extended from October 31, 2004 to January 15, 2005 (“Maturity”).

2)   Accrued and unpaid interest on the Amended Note through October 31, 2004 in the amount of $46,200 is hereby added to the $2,297,443 principal amount of the Amended Note so that as of the date hereof, theprincipal amount of the Amended Note has been increased to $2,343,643 (the “New Principal Amount”).  Interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum will accrue on the unpaid New Principal Amount and be payable at Maturity.

Except as set forth in this letter, the Note remains unmodified and in full force and effect. 

Please indicate your concurrence with the foregoing.

Sincerely,

                                                                       Cenvill Recreation, Inc.

/s/ ToddGresham                                            Agreed By: /s/ Mark F. LevyToddGresham                                                                        Mark F. LevyPresident                                                                                 Vice President and Secretary

**6190 Corte Del Cedro * Carlsbad * California * 92009(760) 683-2500 * fax (760) 683-2544**
Honoro~~e Lee O'Daniel 

Governor of Texas 

Austin, Texes 

Dear Governor O'Daniel: 

Opinion No. 0-2326 

Re: Article 4444, R. C. S., 

1923 and other antipollution statutes make no 

exception to tidewater 

portions of streams used for 

industrisl pprosea. 

In reply to your request of us to make a search, we hove carefully 

examined the statutes of this state and find no exception contained in 

Article 4444 or other anti-pollution statutes in favor of the industrial 

uses of the tidewater pgrtions of the streams of this state. 

Very truly yours 

ATTORNEX GE$EBAL OF TEXAS 

a/ Bugh Q. Buck 

BY 

Hu@ Q. Buck 

Assistant 

HQB: rw 

APPROVED JLTLY, 23, 1940 

s/ GEXALD c.MANN 

ATTORNEY CENERAL OF TEXAS 

APPROVEDOPINION COMMITTEE 

BY B. W. B. 

CHAIRMAN
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2754 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2754

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the work opportunity 
                           credit permanent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2015

     Mr. Reed (for himself, Mr. Rangel, and Ms. Jenkins of Kansas) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the work opportunity 
                           credit permanent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 51(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by striking paragraph (4) and redesignating paragraph (5) as 
paragraph (4).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to individuals who begin for the employer after December 31, 
2014.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD
ENDED  SEPTEMBER  28, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-27-1996
<CASH>                                         239,955
<SECURITIES>                                   3,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,750,521
<ALLOWANCES>                                   144,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,284,074
<PP&E>                                         8,077,709
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,657,811
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,760,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,750,332
<BONDS>                                        2,815,619
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       75,523
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,119,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,760,760
<SALES>                                        16,962,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               16,962,600
<CGS>                                          8,567,225
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,567,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10,530,107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             334,880
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,447,745)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,041,077)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,046,668)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,046,668)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.18)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Colonial Properties Trust, our
general partner, hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)           the Form 10-Q of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the
              period ended September 30, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the
              Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report) fully complies
              with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
              Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)           information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership.



                                               /s/   Thomas H. Lowder
                                                     --------------------
                                                     Thomas H. Lowder
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     November 13, 2003
AFS-12-539-E October 10, 2012

Mr. Randy L. Bailey 4616 Chippendale Drive Fort Collins, CO 80526

Dear Mr. Bailey:

This letter is in response to your correspondence sent to the public docket dated September 2, 2012 (public docket No. FAA-2002-11499) petitioni ng the Federal Aviation Administration for an extension to Exemption No. 7734, as amended. That exemption from 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 91.109(a) and (b)(3) allowed you to conduct flight instruction in certain Beechcraft aircraft equipped with a functioning throwover wheel instead of functioning dual controls.

On August 31, 2011, the FAA amended 14 CFR Part 91 related to throwover control wheels (76 FR 54095). A copy of this rule change is enclosed for your information.

Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new rule, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida Klepper Manager, Airman and
Airspace Rules Division
# C_2023212EN.01001001.xml

| 16.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/10

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.101308

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 212/09)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 11.11.2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.101308 |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aid scheme for the acquisition and modernisation of clean vessels in Italy |
| Legal basis | (a) | Article 1 of Decree-Law No 59 of 6 May 2021, converted with amendments into Law No 101 of 1 July 2021; (b) Interministerial Decree No 389 of 12 October 2021; and (c) Ministerial Decree No 290 of 21 September 2022 |

Date of adoption of the decision

11.11.2022

Aid number

SA.101308

Member State

Italy

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aid scheme for the acquisition and modernisation of clean vessels in Italy

Legal basis

(a)

Article 1 of Decree-Law No 59 of 6 May 2021, converted with amendments into Law No 101 of 1 July 2021; (b) Interministerial Decree No 389 of 12 October 2021; and (c) Ministerial Decree No 290 of 21 September 2022

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Environmental protection

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 500 000 000 EUR

Intensity

40,0  %

Duration

Until 30.6.2023

Economic sectors

Water transport

Name and address of the granting authority

| Ministero delle Infrastrutture e della Mobilità sostenibili |
| --- |
| viale dell'arte 16 -00144 ROMA |

Ministero delle Infrastrutture e della Mobilità sostenibili

viale dell'arte 16 -00144 ROMA

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---