alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE> 1
                                                     Exhibit 10.5

AEtna             Interoffice          Mary Ann Champlin
                  Communication        Aetna Human Resources, RC3A
                                       (860) 273-8371
                                       Fax: (860) 560-8721



To         Richard L. Huber

Date       July 22, 1996

Subject    LETTER AGREEMENT

I am pleased to inform you that effective July 19, 1996, Aetna 
Inc. has assumed all of the obligations of Aetna Services, Inc. 
(formerly Aetna Life and Casualty Company) under your Letter 
Agreement with Aetna Services, Inc.  All references to the 
"Company" in your Letter Agreement will hereinafter be deemed to 
mean both Aetna Services, Inc. and Aetna Inc.  Among other things, 
this means that the Change in Control provisions of your Letter 
Agreement would be triggered by a change in control of either 
Aetna Services, Inc. or Aetna Inc.

By way of background, Aetna Inc. became the ultimate parent within 
the Aetna holding company system as a result of the merger with 
U.S. Healthcare.  Your Letter Agreement was entered into with 
Aetna Services, Inc., which is now a direct subsidiary of Aetna 
Inc.  We felt it would be appropriate for the new ultimate parent, 
Aetna Inc., to assume these obligations to place you on an 
equivalent footing post-merger.

The assumption of your Letter Agreement is self-executing.  You do 
not need to take any action in response to this letter.  If you 
have any questions or concerns, please let me know.




                                             /s/ Mary Ann Champlin
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. AP -76,982

EX P ARTE DAVID LEROY ARTMORE, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 10CR2502 IN THE 122 DISTRICT COURT N D F ROM GALVEST ON COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenc ed to three y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends that his due proce ss rig hts wer e violated beca use a fore nsic scientist did not follow acc epted standards when analy zing evidenc e and there fore the results of his analy ses are unreliable
. The State and t h e trial court agree d that relief was war rante d befor e rema

nd, but the
rec ord was insufficient to decide the case at that time. This Court rema nded the application to obtain
more information. Specifica lly , the Court neede d three additional piece s of information to resolve2

this case : ( 1) a copy of the Depa rtment of Public Saf

ety (DPS) repor

t A pplicant was rely

ing on for his claim; (2) a deter

mination that the lab technicia n named in that repor

t was the only scientist that worke d on this sample; and (3) a finding as to whether the sample was dest ro y ed o r co u l d be rete sted. The trial court has now provided this Court with all the inf ormation nece ssary to r esolve this case on the m erits. The D PS report shows that the l ab technician who was solely responsible for testing the evidenc e in this case is the sci en tist found to have committed misconduct, and the evidenc e in this case has been destroy ed and there fore cannot be rete sted. Applicant i s t h er efore entitled to relief. Relief is g rante d. The judgme nt in Cause No. 10CR2502 in the 122 District Court of n d Galveston County is set aside, and Applicant is rema nded to the custody of the Sheriff of Galveston County
. The trial court shall issue any nece ssary bench war rant within 10 day s afte r the mandate of this Court i ssues. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Crim in a l J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Marc h 6, 2013 Do Not Publish
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6666

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ZONTA TAVARAS ELLISON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,

Chief District Judge. (3:11-cr-00404-FDW-DSC-1; 3:16-cv-00040-

FDW)

Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 20, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zonta Tavaras Ellison, Appellant Pro Se. Kimlani M. Ford, 

Cortney Randall, Assistant United States Attorneys, Elizabeth 

Margaret Greenough, Maria Kathleen Vento, OFFICE OF THE UNITED 

STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Zonta Tavaras Ellison seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Ellison has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001058619 
<NAME> AMERICAN CHILD SUPPORT SERVICE BUREAU INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                       538
<INVENTORY>                                     42,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,205
<PP&E>                                          44,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,699
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,683
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
www.iata.org International Air Transport Association
703 Waterford Way, Suite 600 Miami, FL 33126 Tel: +1 305 264 7772 Fax: +1 305 264 8088 Christa Fornarotto Associate Administrator for Airports
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW, Room 600 East Washington, DC 20591 Miami, November 5, 2012

Re: Privatization Pilot Program (Docket FAA 2009-11 44)

Dear Ms. Fornarotto,

On behalf of the member airlines of the Internation al Air Transport Association, many of which operate out of Luis Muñoz Marin International Airport (SJU) , I would like to express support for the final application from the Puerto Rico Ports Authority (P RPA) and Puerto Rico Public-Private Partnerships Authority for the participation in the FAA Airport Privatization Pilot Program.

Prior to the start of the bidding process, the Puer to Rico Public-Private Partnerships Authority under took a very collaborative approach to establish airline bu y-in. This ensured a bidding process with a final o ffer that received broad support from the airline commun ity. We strongly believe this approach and the results validate the existing requirements as set i n the privatization pilot language such as the need for majority airline support. We encourage FAA to maint ain this course and review any future privatization requests on a case by case basis. Moreover, we woul d like to ensure maintenance of the current privatization framework including the majority in i nterest clause to safeguard privatization delivers value
for all Stakeholders.

The application in SJU provides the needed capital, operational and infrastructure improvements for SJ U without raising costs to users, a rather unique and positive outcome compared to many previous privatizations on a global scale.

We remain ready to provide further information to F AA regarding our position.

Sincerely

Cyriel Kronenburg Head of Infrastructure & Government Affairs

North America & the Caribbean C: +1 (954) 663 6796 kronenburc@iata.org
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
ICOS Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-48401, 33-80680, 33-64762, 333-08485 and 333-78315) on Form S-8 of ICOS
Corporation of our report dated January 21, 2000, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of ICOS Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 1999 and
1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1999, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report
on Form 10-K of ICOS Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP

seattle, Washington
March 23, 2000
# CI2022481EN.01000101.xml

| 19.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 481/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 481/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decisions (CFSP) 2022/2477, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2476 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2022/C 481 I/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/2477 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2476 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons, entities and bodies should be included in the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for the designation of those persons, entities and bodies appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons, entities and bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address, before 16 January 2023:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ LI 322, 16.12.2022, p. 466.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(4)  OJ LI 322, 16.12.2022, p. 318.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Applera Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tony L. White, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ Tony L. White                                                                               |   |   |  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--|
|  

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Date:  August 24, 2006 |
# C_2023311EN.01000301.xml

| 1.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/3

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.104412

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 311/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 2.5.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.104412 |
| Member State | France |
| Region | REUNION |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aide à la restructuration octroyée à Air Austral |
| Legal basis | |
| Type of measure | Ad Hoc Case
  Air Austral |
| Objective | Restructuring undertakings in difficulty |
| Form of aid | Debt write-off, Tax deferment, Other forms of equity intervention |
| Budget | Overall budget: 0 EUR
  Annual budget: 0 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | From 5.1.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Air transport |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministère de l'Economie et des Finances |
| 139 rue de Bercy |

Date of adoption of the decision

2.5.2023

Aid number

SA.104412

Member State

France

Region

REUNION

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aide à la restructuration octroyée à Air Austral

Legal basis

Type of measure

Ad Hoc Case

Air Austral

Objective

Restructuring undertakings in difficulty

Form of aid

Debt write-off, Tax deferment, Other forms of equity intervention

Budget

Overall budget: 0 EUR

Annual budget: 0 EUR

Intensity

Duration

From 5.1.2023

Economic sectors

Air transport

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministère de l'Economie et des Finances

139 rue de Bercy

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA

---
----

| 1. | I      have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of Nature Vision, Inc.;  and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/   Jeffrey P.      Zernov |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   |                                        |
|   | Jeffrey      P. Zernov                      |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer                |

----
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Anabelle L. Chua,
Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge, that our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our financial condition and results of operations.

March 28, 2012



/s/ Anabelle L. ChuaANABELLE L. CHUA
Senior Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<MULTIPLIER>      1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                 DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                         2,280,788
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  8,542,204
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                   17,021,475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              28,938,380
<PP&E>                                                        16,681,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 6,052,899
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                48,078,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         12,944,363
<BONDS>                                                       10,193,064
<COMMON>                                                       3,239,345
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    21,210,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  48,078,479
<SALES>                                                       57,363,317
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              58,165,715
<CGS>                                                         37,534,815
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 37,534,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               772,035
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                6,526,441
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   2,583,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            3,943,441
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   3,943,441
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       1.07
<FN>
<F1>ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARE NET OF ALLOWANCE
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
# C_2022448EN.01003101.xml

| 25.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 448/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 448/31

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 448/05)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Crotone-Roma Fiumicino and vice versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 26 March 2023 to 25 March 2026 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | Two months after the date of publication of this notice |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | ENAC |
| Direzione Trasporto Aereo e Licenze |
| Viale Castro Pretorio, n. 118 |
| 00185 Roma |
| ITALY |

Member State

Italy

Routes concerned

Crotone-Roma Fiumicino and vice versa

Period of validity of the contract

From 26 March 2023 to 25 March 2026

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months after the date of publication of this notice

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

ENAC

Direzione Trasporto Aereo e Licenze

Viale Castro Pretorio, n. 118

00185 Roma

ITALY

Tel. +39 0644596247

Email: osp@enac.gov.it

Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it

http://www.enac.gov.it

---