alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3073 

To prohibit the receipt of Federal financial assistance by sanctuary cities, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2015 

Mr. DESJARLAIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight 

and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the receipt of Federal financial assistance by 

sanctuary cities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sanctuary City All 

5 Funding Elimination Act of 2015’’ or the ‘‘SAFE Act of 

6 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3073 IH

1 SEC. 2. NO FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR SANC2 TUARY CITIES. 

3 Any State or local government that is not in compli4 ance with section 642 of the Illegal Immigration Reform 

5 and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 

6 1373) may not receive any Federal financial assistance (as 

7 such term is defined in section 7501(a)(5) of title 31, 

8 United States Code) until the State or local government 

9 has produced a comprehensive plan to come back into 

10 compliance with such section 642. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001029318
<NAME>  University Accounting Service Inc
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                       538
<INVENTORY>                                     42,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,205
<PP&E>                                          44,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,699
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,683
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      In connection  with the quarterly  report of New Century  Equity  Holdings
Corp.  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mark E.
Schwarz,  Principal  Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to the best of my knowledge that:

  (1) The Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended September 30, 2007,  filed with
      the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on November  14,  2007,  fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2) The  information  contained in the Form 10-Q report for the quarter  ended
      September  30,  2007  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the
      financial  condition  and  results of  operations  of New  Century  Equity
      Holdings Corp.

By: /s/ Mark E. Schwarz                  Date: November 14, 2007
    -----------------------------              ---------------------
Mark E. Schwarz
Principal Executive Officer
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 28, 2011 

h1219 

Order 

 

December 28, 2011 

143020 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143020 

 COA: 302022 

Wayne CC: 88-006691-FC 

VOL PARKER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 18, 2011 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
# v/ 202366367 5 LincOSTWS S 31 0 O S 5 6 0 1 o m JI M MATHESO N ZwDnacT.UiM ) hlto:/teothtminJtpu».w w 

# Consre£(s f o f tfi e iHnite b &tate£ ( . ilousf eo f 3£Uprdrentatft)£f

r tiaa^fnston , S C 20515-440 2 Augus t 27,2010

- ENERa V AN D COMMERC E C0UMITTS 6 sincQMlcrTTUS ; H(MJ H Encra vu o Ai a OiMun r CM»ttta,TWOI«fd > coMwi a Ptwurw n SOENC E AN D TeCHNOLOO V coMMnre e
Th e Honorabl e Ra y LaHoo d Seor«tai y U.S . Dcfjartmen

t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave . S B Washingto nD.C . 20590-000 1 Dear Secretar y LaHood . — t r o >
o CO r n -

:3D : 

### !r n C o

I a mwritin g i nsupport

o f th e gran t applicatio nfiledb y th e City o f S t Georg e for

th e sWi ! Communit

y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

(SCASD ) gran t

program . Currently , th e S t

Georg e Municipa l Airport onl y provide s nonsto p servic e b y SkyWes t t o Sal t Lak e City witha3 3 sea t

EMB-12 0 aircraf

t A ne w replacemen t

airport i s imde r constructio nan d schedul ^ for

completio ni nJanuary 2011 . Recen t studie s sho w a nincrease dnee dfor acces s t o and&o mSt . Georg e plu s astron g loca l deman dfo r ai r servic e t o Lo s Angeles , Denver , Phoenix , Sa nFrancisco , aridDallas . Community leader s ar e activel y recruitin g additiona l ai r servic e provider s fo

r th e ne w aiiport , howeve r mos t airline s are seekin g incentive s t o begi noperation s i n S t George . I t i s to y understandin g tha t

th e SCAS D funding , i f

successful , wil l ai di nrccniitmen t effort s b y providin g marketin g fbnd s an dpossibl e revenu e guarantee s fo r airline s expandin g o r

startin g ne w servic e fromth e S t

Georg e Airpor t A s yo u develo p prioritie s fo r th e us e o f

th e SCAS D funding , I hop e yo u wil l giv e th e City o f S t George' s applicatio nevery appropriat e consideratioi L Thank yo u agai nfo r

you r consideratio no f

thi s reques t

Pleas e d o no t

hesitat e t o contac t

Kriste n Lingle y o f

m y staf f a t 202-225-301 1 withan y question s yo u hav e regardin g thi s matter .

SinceFely ,

m 4 MATHESO N Membe r o f Congres s

24S « (bnuw^fitM^^ ^ Oinp M WMwaror , D C 20ft t B<440 2 (WM : 00 9 33(401 1 U1IU 0 2401> W MMOAvMKin wSoun d «23 S So<niSttTUiLUrS411 B naclB0i}4as*i2a a Ru!{001)48S'14l 7 tfiUU mUU H fl(BC& aitHambUuDowiHIOI B ewrORmcU T8470 0 nocHanen-CBB o Fu n (435) 627-147 3 ncMTt D O

N HCVCiC

O fWO I
#### NATIONAL INSPECTION & REPAIRS, INC., Plaintiff, v. GEORGE S. MAY INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, and William Doane, Defendants.

No. 01-2489-JAR.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

June 10, 2002.

Dan E. Turner, Turner & Turner Law Firm, Topeka, KS, for plaintiff.

*324Michael J. Abrams, Blaine C. Kimrey, La-throp & Gage L.C., Kansas City, MO, for defendant.

*MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECONSIDER ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND AND ORDER GRANTING TRANSFER*

ROBINSON, District Judge.

On May 15, 2002, Plaintiff National Inspection & Repairs, Inc. filed a motion to reconsider the Court’s May 2, 2002 Memorandum and Order Denying Plaintiffs Motion to Remand and Granting Defendant’s Motion to Transfer, which transferred this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. For the reasons stated below, the Court denies the Motion to Reconsider.

As the Tenth Circuit noted in *Hawkins v. Evans,**1***the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not recognize a motion to reconsider, so such motions are construed as a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend, if the motion is filed within ten days of the entry of judgment; but if the motion is filed more than ten days after entry of judgment, it is construed as a Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. In this Court, D. Kan. Rule 7.3 requires that motions seeking reconsideration of dispositive orders or judgments be filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) or 60.

Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e), the court may alter or amend an order or judgment, on one of three recognized grounds: an intervening change in controlling law, availability of new evidence previously unavailable, or the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice.2 Plaintiffs motion is based on none of these grounds. Instead, Plaintiff merely raised two arguments the Court previously addressed. The Court previously rejected Plaintiffs argument that because defendant Doane was in default, the Court need not consider any evidence concerning the effect his presence had on the complete diversity of parties. And, Plaintiffs argument that the Court should ignore the evidence that Doane was a resident of Missouri because removal statutes are to be liberally construed, is an argument that is neither new nor compelling. A motion under Rule 59(e) does not provide the movant a second opportunity to restate, clarify, improve, or rehash arguments that previously failed.3

Plaintiff having failed to raise or show any of the recognized grounds for relief,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1

. 64 F.3d 543, 546 (10th Cir.1995).

2

. *See Servants of Paraclete v. Does,*204 F.3d 1005, 1012 (10th Cir.2000); *Butler v. Boeing Co.,*175 F.Supp.2d 1307, 1308-1309 (D.Kan.2001) (citing *Major v. Benton,*647 F.2d 110, 112 (10th Cir. 1981); *Burnett v.*W. *Res., Inc.,*929 F.Supp. 1349, 1360 (D.Kan.1996)). *See also*D. Kan. R. 7.3(b).

3

. *See Servants of Paraclete,*204 F.3d at 1012 (citing *Van Skiver v. United States,*952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991)).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<CIK>                         0001013564
<NAME>                        Farm Family Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           223,181
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          9,563
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            9,565
<EQUITIES>                                     8,078
<MORTGAGE>                                     1,725
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 247,969
<CASH>                                         3,886
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             10,401
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         10,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 329,325
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                143,205
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            58,143
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 19,774
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                1,293
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       53
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   329,325
<PREMIUMS>                                     34,973
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            4,416
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (90)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 220
<BENEFITS>                                     24,697
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    10,490
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,268
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,474
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,794
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,794
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.53
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 114,383
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            24,847
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (150)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             4,588
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               16,900
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                117,592
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        


</TABLE>
# Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA

- 2016

- 3988

Directorate Identifier: 2015NM130AD

A330

- 92

- 3132

--- 6/19/2014

A340

- 92

- 4100

--- 6/19/2014

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket



### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEANN EVANS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 164 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
# C_2022397EN.01000501.xml

| 17.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 397/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 397/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10820 – BERKSHIRE / ALLEGHANY)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 397/05)

On 23 September 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10820. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10820. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2023279EN.01000101.xml

| 8.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11010 – INEOS / SINOPEC / ETHYLENE JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 279/01)

On 17 February 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11010. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11010. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001058633
<NAME> UNION SPECIAL STEEL CASTING CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                       538
<INVENTORY>                                     42,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,205
<PP&E>                                          44,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,699
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,683
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023203EN.01001101.xml

| 9.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/11

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107275

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 203/10)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 26.5.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107275 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Region | REGION WALLONNE |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCTF: aid for undertakings in the framework of the energy crisis in the Walloon region |
| Legal basis | Arrêté du Gouvernement wallon du 5 avril 2023 pris en exécution du décret du 19 octobre 2022 visant à mettre en œuvre des mesures d’aides à destination des entreprises dans le cadre de la crise de l’énergie pour ce qui concerne le troisième trimestre 2022 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Compensation of damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 153 125 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 153 125 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Gouvernement Wallon, représenté par le Ministre de l'Economie Willy Borsus — SPW Département de l'Investissement |
| Place des Célestines 1 — 5000 Namur |

Date of adoption of the decision

26.5.2023

Aid number

SA.107275

Member State

Belgium

Region

REGION WALLONNE

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCTF: aid for undertakings in the framework of the energy crisis in the Walloon region

Legal basis

Arrêté du Gouvernement wallon du 5 avril 2023 pris en exécution du décret du 19 octobre 2022 visant à mettre en œuvre des mesures d’aides à destination des entreprises dans le cadre de la crise de l’énergie pour ce qui concerne le troisième trimestre 2022

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Compensation of damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 153 125 000 EUR

Annual budget: 153 125 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Gouvernement Wallon, représenté par le Ministre de l'Economie Willy Borsus — SPW Département de l'Investissement

Place des Célestines 1 — 5000 Namur

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
16

Appendix C 

UAS: DJI 

See Appendix D for user manual

Model: Inspire 1

S/N: W13DCA29020646
17

Appendix D: User Manual
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81