alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.33


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE
                                 ---------------


         $21,794.96                                                 May 10, 1996


     For value received, Mitchell Blatt ("Maker") promises to pay to the order
of Coimach Laundry Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), at its
offices in Roslyn, New York, or such other place as designated in writing by the
holder hereof, the aggregate principal sum of $21,794.96. Maker will pay the
aggregate principal sum in eight equal payments of $2,724.37 on each of the
first eight anniversary dates of the date hereof and, on each such date, Maker
will pay interest accrued through such date at the rate specified below.

     Interest will accrue on the outstanding principal amount of this Note at a
rate equal to the lesser of (i) 8% per annum or (ii) the highest rate permitted
by applicable law, and shall be payable at such time as the principal of this
Note becomes due and payable.

     The amounts due under this Note are secured by a pledge of 1,415 shares of
the Company's Class B Common Stock, par value $.01 per share ("Common Stock")
issued to the Maker on the date hereof. Such shares of Common Stock shall remain
in the possession of the Company until this Promissory Note is paid in full.

     In the event Maker fails to pay any amounts due hereunder when due, Maker
shall pay to the holder hereof, in addition to such amounts due, all costs of
collection, including reasonable attorneys fees.

     Maker, or his successors and assigns, hereby waives diligence, presentment,
protest and demand and notice of protest, demand, dishonor and nonpayment of
this Note, and expressly agrees that this Note, or any payment hereunder, may be
extended from time to time and that the holder hereof may accept security for
this Note or release security for this Note, all without in any way affecting
the liability of Maker hereunder.

     This Note shall be governed by the internal laws, not the laws of
conflicts, of the State of New York.




                                        /s/ Mitchell Blatt
                                     -----------------------------------
                                     Mitchell Blatt
Martin, Michael (OST) OnT-CvST- ^^^?-;:)l-<^'} 

From: Bradshaw, Jay [Jay.Bradshaw@maine.gov] 'AMSPORTATION 

Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:36 AM '• •-'r OPFR/'T'OM'^ 

To: dennis.devane@dot.gov; Martin, Michael (OST) ' •• •'--'^^-"^n^ 

Subject: Appeal for consideration re: Commercial Service at AUG (Augusta, ME) 

Good Morning, 

It has come to my attention that the decision regarding the commercial air carrier for AUG (Augusta, ME) is under 

consideration within your office. I am writing to express both my thanks for your reviewing the decision made by the 

Augusta City Council - and to provide my support that Colgan Air continue to be the carrier for this airport. 

I make this request for many reasons - many parties, including Colgan, have made operational and financial investments 

in the service to AUG - an investment that plays an important role in the business environment. Having access to the US 

Airways network and convenient connections in BOS is a major consideration for business and pleasure travelers. 

I am impressed that recognizing the financial challenges of federal subsidies, that Colgan Air has extended their 

commitment with a revised fare schedule that will make this service even more appealing. 

While I have many compliments for the Colgan approach to their service at AUG, I am at the same time quite troubled 

by the decision made by the Airport Committee regarding carrier plans. That concern is heightened by the potential 

conflict of interest with two members of that committee who stand to personally benefit by a change to Cape Air. 

Also troubling is that when the committee's report was presented to the Augusta City Council, many council members 

publicly commented that they received many calls, letters, and e-mails from folks supporting Colgan. One city councilor 

said that they received more comments regarding keeping Colgan than they had on any other agenda item in recent 

memory. 

From a personal standpoint, I fly out of AUG several times a year on mostly business travel. I enjoy the convenience of 

using AUG and to the personal and friendly service provided by Colgan staff. 

"Convenience" in air travel is a term not often used - and in my opinion, moving to the more limited service proposed 

by Cape Air is a significant step backwards for AUG and the central Maine area. 

Thank you for your time and consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Jay Bradshaw, Director 

Maine Emergency Medical Services 

Department of Public Safety 

45 Commerce Dr., Suite 1 

152 State House Station 

Augusta, ME 04333 

(207) 626-3860 

(207) 287-6251 (fax) 

www.maine.qov/dps/ems
##### 



(PHELPS DODGE LOGO)
    
    One N. Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85004         (602) 366-8100
 Award of Restricted Stock
  
   a.
    
    The Restricted Period for 25% of the shares of Restricted Stock
issued pursuant to this award shall lapse on the third anniversary date of the
Grant Date.b.
    
    The Restricted Period for an additional 25% of the shares of
Restricted Stock issued pursuant to this award shall lapse on the fourth
anniversary date of the Grant Date.c.
    
    The Restricted Period for the remaining 50% of the shares of
Restricted Stock issued pursuant to this award shall lapse on the fifth
anniversary date of the Grant Date.




---



##### 



a.
    
    If your employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries
terminates (except for a termination that occurs within six months of the Grant
Date) by reason of your Retirement on or after your Normal Retirement Date, as
defined in the Phelps Dodge Retirement Plan (or any successor plan thereof),
any Restricted Period still in effect shall lapse upon your termination of
employment.b.
    
    If your employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries
terminates (except for a termination that occurs within six months of the Grant
Date) by reason of your Retirement on or after your Early Retirement Date, as
defined in the Phelps Dodge Retirement Plan (or any successor plan thereof),
and before your Normal Retirement Date under conditions determined by the
Committee, in its sole discretion, not to be adverse to the Company, and you
sign a release of claims in such form as is satisfactory to the Company (in its
sole discretion), any Restricted Period still in effect shall lapse upon your
termination of employment.
  2




---



##### 



PHELPS DODGE CORPORATIONBy:Senior Vice PresidentACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:Date:
 3
Mark Buckner letter agreement



 Exhibit 10.67 
  

			
	 


	  	 Path 1 Network Technologies Inc.
 6215 Ferris Square, Suite 140
 San Diego, CA 92121
  
 Phone 858.450.4220
 Fax 858.450.4203
 www.path1.com


  
 August 12, 2004 
  
 Mark D. Buckner 
 P.O. Box 7250 
 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 
  
 Dear Mark, 
  
 On behalf of Path 1 Network Technologies Inc., we are excited to have you join us as a Director on our Board of Directors. We believe your skills and talents would
greatly add to this distinguished panel. 
  

			
	 Position:
 Reporting to:
 Monthly Compensation:
 Stock Options:
	  	 Director; Chairman, Audit Committee
 Chairman of the
Board of Directors
 $2,000
 Incentive stock options on 25,000
shares subject to Board approval of Class B Common Stock with an exercise price to be determined on the date of grant per share fully vesting quarterly over a two (2) year period in accordance with the company’s 2000 Stock Option Plan, subject
to Board approval.

		
	 Effective Date:
	  	August 3, 2004


  
 We look forward to your
acceptance of this offer and to a mutually rewarding professional relationship. 
  
 Sincerely, 
  
 Path 1 Network Technologies Inc. 
  
  
 By: John R.
Zavoli 
 Director; President & CEO 
  
  

 If you agree to all the
terms and conditions of this agreement, please sign and return to me, at which time it will become binding. 
  
  
  
  

					
	 /s/    John R. Zavoli
	 	 	 	 8/12/04

	 Name
	 	 	 	 Date


  

 1 of 1
#### KIRKSEY v. STATE.

No. 20083.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 25, 1939.

Percy Foreman, of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for negligent homicide of the first degree, punishment assessed ber *906ing one year’s imprisonment in the county jail.

The first count of the information charge negligent homicide in the first degree, alleging substantially that appellant was engaged in the performance of a lawful act, to-wit, operating a motor vehicle on a designated highway in Harris County, Texas, and that he was negligent and careless in the operation of said vehicle, thereby causing it to collide with and strike another car in which deceased was a passenger, causing the death of deceased. The particular acts of negligence and carelessness in operating said car were alleged, followed by averments that there was no intention on the part of appellant to kill deceased, but that there was apparent danger of doing so.

The second count of the information alleged negligent homicide of the second degree but upon motion of appellant this count was quashed and the cáse went to the jury on the first count of the information only.

Article 1230, P.C., provides that negligent homicide is of two kinds, one which happens in the performance of a lawful act and that which occurs in the performance of an unlawful act. Art. 1237, P.C., fixes the punishment for negligent homicide of the first degree by confinement in jail not exceeding one year *or*by fine not exceeding one thousand dollars. • Article 1240, P.C., gives as one definition of the unlawful acts mentioned as “such acts, not being penal offenses, as would give just occasion for a civil action,” and the punishment prescribed by Article 1243 under such circumstances is by fine not exceeding one thousand dollars *and*by imprisonment in jail not exceeding one year.

It is appellant’s contention that the negligent acts alleged in the first count would give “just occasion for a civil action,” and therefore that the grade of the offense becomes negligent homicide of the second degree and the penalty assessed by the jury was not authorized because it required the punishment to be by both fine and imprisonment.

The very contention here made by appellant was settled adversely to him in Simmons v. State, 109 Tex.Cr.R. 157, 3 S.W. 2d 449, in which the precise question now urged was discussed both in the original opinion and in the opinion on rehearing. The lawful act appellant was charged with performing was driving an automobile upon the public highway. Per se it would give no occasion for civil action, and the case mentioned draws this distinction, which is supported by the several cases cited in support of the opinion in the Simmons Case.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Napoleon L. Nazareno,
President and CEO of Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge, that our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our financial condition and results of operations.

April 2, 2014



/s/ Napoleon L. NazarenoNAPOLEON L. NAZARENOPresident and CEO(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10-52


                                AMENDMENT TO THE
            DTE ENERGY COMPANY EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN

         The DTE Energy Company Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan is
amended by adding new Subsection 6.05 as follows:

                  6.05. Unscheduled Withdrawals. A former Participant receiving
         distributions in installments is permitted to make unscheduled
         withdrawals as described below.

                           (a) Election. A former Participant may request in
         writing to the Vice President, Human Resources, an unscheduled partial
         withdrawal or entire withdrawal of the undistributed balance of the
         former Participant's Vested Account, which will be paid within 30 days
         in a single lump sum.

                           (b) Withdrawal Penalty. There will be a penalty
         deducted from the Vested Account prior to an unscheduled withdrawal
         equal to 10% of the Vested Account balance as of the date the
         unscheduled withdrawal request is received by the Vice President, Human
         Resources.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<CIK>                         0001013564
<NAME>                        Farm Family Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           269,825
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          8,471
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            8,949
<EQUITIES>                                     4,841
<MORTGAGE>                                     728
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 292,495
<CASH>                                         5,523
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             17,513
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         13,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 391,271
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                168,411
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            72,650
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 11,735
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       53
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,732
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   391,271
<PREMIUMS>                                     87,744
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            9,518
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             342
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 483
<BENEFITS>                                     66,127
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    23,081
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                8,799
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,713
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,086
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,086
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.15
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 127,568
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            67,946
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (1,817)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             23,964
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               33,238
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                136,495
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        



</TABLE>
The following documents my recollection of events in September 1999:

EPA and BIA planned for EPA to present a training session entitled "TSCA PCB Regulations"

to the members ofthe Navajo Nation and others on September 28-29, 1999 in Gallup, NM.

Beginning in February 1998, EPA had discussed with Jerold Gidner ofBIA in Washington, DC,

PCB-related events in the Standing Rock Reservation in North Dakota and South Dakota. In

schools and administrative buildings in the Standing Rock Reservation, PCB-containing

fluorescent light ballasts leaked and dripped onto desk tops and carpets, which were eventually

removed or cleaned up. EPA sought to present information about the PCB-related events in

Standing Rock with the trainees. Just before the beginning ofthe training in New Mexico, I

asked Mr. Gidner what the total cost ofthe cleanup at Standing Rock was so that I could include

this information in my presentation. Mr. Gidner responded that the cost was more than

$500,000, at which time I entered this cost amount into the training materials. I have attached

the two presentation pages (7 and 8) about the PCB events in Standing Rock from the training

materials.

John H. Smith, Ph.D.
THE STANDING ROCK EXP ENCE PART I

On February 2, 1998, BIA staffin the administration

building complained ofrespiratory problems to BIA.

On February 6 and 7, 1998 a BIA contractor conducts

extensive testing. Results negative..

Concurrently, BIA contacts the manufacturer ofthe

fluorescent light ballasts in several building and finds the

ballasts contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).

BIA presumes that the initial sampling was invalid and hires

another contractor to recheck for PCBs.
THE STANDING ROCK EXPERIENCE PART II

February 20-27, 1998, the new contractor collects samples under

suspected ballast releases and analyzes for PCBs, polychlorinated

dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans. Several ofthese

samples show levels of PCBs above EPA's cleanup levels.

BIA decontaminates all areas where it finds any detectable level of PCBs.

In addition to fluorescent light ballasts and light fixtures, BIA removes

office equipment and carpeting and disposes of all as PCB waste.

The high school building where contamination was found was closed

from February to June, but reopened for summer school.

BIA spent in excess of $500,000 to clean up the contaminated buildings.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      35,444,138
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               26,228,366
<ALLOWANCES>                                   570,150
<INVENTORY>                                 20,674,689
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            86,052,715
<PP&E>                                      91,617,721
<DEPRECIATION>                              51,301,322
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             138,031,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,957,074
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,743,062
<OTHER-SE>                                  96,972,004
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               138,031,696
<SALES>                                    163,599,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           166,519,762
<CGS>                                      137,976,808
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              137,976,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,802,677
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             13,731,795
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,917,937
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,813,858
<DISCONTINUED>                              (4,267,639)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,546,219
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        














                                     67 

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 99 - REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
TIB FINANCIAL CORP.


To the Audit Committee of the
   Board of Directors of
   TIB Financial Corp.



We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated financial statements of TIB
Financial Corp. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2000, and for the three-month
period then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken
as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for them to be in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.





/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
May 10, 2000