alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Graves, Linda 

Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 3:51 PM 

To: 'Michael McGaraghan' 

Cc: Lewis, Ronald; 'Mahima Gupta'; Edwards, Brenda 

Subject: RE: Lighting Rulemaking: GSFL Compliance Lumen/Wattage Data request

Dear Mr. McGaraghan:

 

The attached spreadsheet contains the compliance and certification data you requested.

 

Linda Graves, Lighting Standards Project Leader

202-586-1851

From: Michael McGaraghan [mailto:mmcgaraghan@energy-solution.com] 

Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 10:19 PM 

To: Graves, Linda 

Cc: Lewis, Ronald; McCabe, Michael; MRivest@Navigantconsulting.com; 

mahima.gupta@navigantconsulting.com 

Subject: Lighting Rulemaking: GSFL Compliance Lumen/Wattage Data request

Dear Ms. Graves, 

I am writing to request that DOE provide the manufacturer compliance data for linear fluorescent lamp 

wattage and lumens, upon which DOE based its GSFL analysis. (Page 16946 in Federal Register) DOE 

specified that the lumens and wattage reported for compliance purposes can be significantly different 

than the catalog lumen and wattage values, so we are unable to accurately evaluate this part of the 

analysis. In doing our own research about which lamps will meet each level, we have incorporated “ANSI 

rated wattage,” which DOE supplied in its analysis for most lamp types, and which may be more accurate 

than catalog rated lumens. However, ANSI rated wattage may also be significantly different than 

compliance data wattage, so our lumen per watt estimates are imprecise on both fronts. 

One reason this is important is that for some lamps, our calculations seem slightly different than DOE’s 

analysis. For example, DOE found that T12’s would most likely not meet TSL 4 and would definitely not 

meet TSL 5. We have found some T12s that appear to be significantly more efficient than the TSL 4 

standard and possibly also better than the TSL 5 standard. It would also be helpful to have the 

compliance values that DOE used so that we could determine how far short of a given level each product 

is. For example—if 25W 4’ T8 lamps do not meet TSL 5, we need to know how much further 

improvement is needed to meet that level in order to provide informed comments. 

We realize that this manufacturer data is sensitive, and that in order to make it public you may have to 

mask some information. However, if possible, we request that you provide the catalog initial lumens and 

catalog wattage for each lamp. At the very least we would need to know the product class and color 

temperature, in addition to the compliance lumen and wattage data. 

Because this data weighed so heavily into the analysis of each trial standard level, we feel it should be 

made public. Thank you very much for your consideration. 

Regards, 

Mike 

Mike McGaraghan

Project Manager; Energy Solutions 

1610 Harrison St, Oakland, CA 94612 

(510) 482-4420 ext. 242 

(510) 482-4421 (fax) 

EE-2006-STD-0131 COMMENT 68
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements contained in the Form 10-Q for the three months ended March
31, 1999 for Aetna Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            31,118
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                         814
<MORTGAGE>                                       3,517
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      317
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  38,344
<CASH>                                           2,008
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           1,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,187
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 18,572
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                228
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   4,008
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           17,240
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  2,526
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              862
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,268
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,187
<PREMIUMS>                                       4,381
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                741
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  17
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     557
<BENEFITS>                                       4,135
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                         50
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    300
<INCOME-TAX>                                       121
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                179
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       179
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.16
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                        CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT

         AMENDMENT NO. 1 (this "Amendment") dated as of May 24, 1995

between Pennsylvania Enterprises, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation having

offices at Wilkes-Barre Center, 39 Public Square, Wilkes-Barre,

Pennsylvania 18711-0601 (the "Company") and <Executive> whose residence

address is <Address> (the "Executive").

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have heretofore entered

into a Change in Control Agreement dated as of October 26, 1989 (the

"Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the

Agreement;

         NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

         1.  Defined Terms.  Capitalized terms used herein and not

otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to

such terms in the Agreement.

         2.  Amendment.  Section 1(w)(ii) of the Agreement is hereby

amended by adding the following proviso immediately following the word

"Company" in the last line thereof:

         ". provided however, that the Executive and the Company each
         hereby agree that consummation of the transactions contemplated by
         the Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of April 26, 1995 among the
         Company, Pennsylvania Gas and Water Company, American Water Works
         Company, Inc. and Pennsylvania-American Water Company, as amended
         from time to time, shall not be deemed to constitute a "Change in
         Control of the Company" for purposes of this Agreement."

         3.  Effectiveness.  This Amendment shall become effective

immediately upon the execution and delivery of this amendment by the

parties hereto.

         4.  Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by, and

construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth

of Pennsylvania.

<PAGE>


         5.  Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed by the parties

hereto in any number of counterparts, all of which when taken together

shall constitute one and the same instrument.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment

to be duly executed as of the date first above written.

                                    PENNSYLVANIA ENTERPRISES, INC.



                                    By: __________________________
                                        Title:  President and CEO




                                        __________________________
                                        Executive
<PAGE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                            7247
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    94061
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2430
<INVENTORY>                                      64859
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                173196
<PP&E>                                          263626
<DEPRECIATION>                                   56739
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  533309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           100992
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         20663
<OTHER-SE>                                      132933
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    533309
<SALES>                                         653855
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                653855
<CGS>                                           542640
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   584127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               13602
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  56126
<INCOME-TAX>                                     22406
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              33720
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     33720
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.18
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 01-6540

RODERICK BLACK,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City.

Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge.

(CR-94-15-BO, CA-01-2-2-BO)

Submitted: August 14, 2001

Decided: September 19, 2001

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Roderick Black, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Roderick Black seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion as untimely. On

appeal, Black contends the district court was obliged to consider his

motion because the Supreme Court’s holdings in Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), Richardson v. United States, 526 U.S.

813 (1999), and Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137 (1995), render

his motion timely, and Black’s claim based on newly discovered evidence was brought with due diligence. For reasons stated herein, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

As a preliminary matter, Apprendi is not retroactively applicable to

cases on collateral review. United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139,

151 (4th Cir. 2001). Additionally, the Supreme Court’s decision in

Bousley v. United States, 523 U.S. 614 (1998), which applied Bailey

retroactively, preceded Black’s § 2255 motion by over one year. Consequently, Black’s motion is untimely as to these claims. 

Finally, to the extent Black raises a timely challenge to his conviction under Richardson, we note the jury returned guilty verdicts as to

several offenses that were listed in the indictment as predicate

offenses to the continuing criminal enterprise for which he was convicted. Consequently, the district court’s alleged failure to give an

instruction meeting the requirements of Richardson is harmless error.

See United States v. Brown, 202 F.3d 691, 700 (4th Cir. 2000) (citing

United States v. Escobar de Jesus, 187 F.3d 148, 162 (1st Cir. 1999)).

Finally, we find Black’s newly discovered evidence could have been

presented earlier with the exercise of due diligence and thus is timebarred under § 2255. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss

Black’s appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED

2 UNITED STATES v. BLACK
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-40363, 333-51585, 333-81351, 333-89280, 333-100224, 333-113723, 333-117258,
333-140746 and 333-141330 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-124383 on Form S-3 of our report dated April 30, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of The Pep BoysManny, Moe & Jack and subsidiaries (the "Company") (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
paragraph relating to the Company's adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation ("FIN") 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 158,Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans, SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),Share-Based Payment, and FIN 47,Accounting for
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, as of February 4, 2007, February 3, 2007, January 29, 2006, and January 28, 2006, respectively) and our
report dated April 30, 2008 (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness), appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Pep BoysManny, Moe & Jack for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2008.

Deloitte
& Touche LLP

Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
April 30, 2008

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ValCom, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended  June  30,  2008  as  filed  with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,  Vincent  Vellardita,
Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies  with  the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A  signed original of this written statement required by Section 906  has  been
provided  to ValCom, Inc. and will be retained by ValCom, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

October 21, 2008


By: /s/  Vince Vellardita
    ----------------------
    Vince Vellardita
    Chief Executive Officer,
    Chief Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2672 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the amount and duration 

of scholarships under the Department of Veterans Affairs Employee 

Incentive Scholarship Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2015 

Mr. MOULTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the amount 

and duration of scholarships under the Department of 

Veterans Affairs Employee Incentive Scholarship Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Train Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2672 IH

1 SEC. 2. DURATION AND AMOUNT OF SCHOLARSHIPS UNDER 

2 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS EM3 PLOYEE INCENTIVE SCHOLARSHIP PRO4 GRAM. 

5 (a) DURATION OF SCHOLARSHIP.— 

6 (1) AGREEMENT.—Section 7672(e)(1)(A) of 

7 title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘three’’ and inserting ‘‘four’’. 

9 (2) PERIOD OF PAYMENT.—Subsection (c)(2) of 

10 section 7673 of such title is amended by striking 

11 ‘‘three’’ and inserting ‘‘four’’. 

12 (b) AMOUNT OF SCHOLARSHIP.—Subsection (b)(1) of 

13 such section 7673 is amended by striking ‘‘$10,000’’ and 

14 inserting ‘‘$25,000’’. 

15 (c) APPLICATION.— 

16 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply with respect to individuals 

18 who first enroll in the Department of Veterans Af19 fairs Employee Incentive Scholarship Program under 

20 subchapter VI of chapter 76 of title 38, United 

21 States Code, on or after the date of the enactment 

22 of this Act. 

23 (2) SPECIAL RULE FOR CURRENT PARTICI24 PANTS.—An individual who is enrolled in such pro25 gram as of the day before the date of the enactment 

26 of this Act may elect to be covered by the amendVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:50 Jun 05, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2672.IH H2672

srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2672 IH

1 ments made by this section with respect to a quar2 ter, semester, or term, as applicable, commencing on 

3 or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### MOORE v. STATE.

No. 15967.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 12, 1933.

O. H. Atchley, of New Boston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for murder, punishment being five years in the penitentiary.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears to be in proper form. In this condition of the record nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 297 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents                           ( print page 76882)                        are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-617, CP2024-625.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21310 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Palliative Care Research Consortium.                    

*Date:*                         November 7, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Janetta Lun, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rm. 213, Rockville, MD 20814, (301) 496-9666,                         *janetta.lun@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 18, 2024. 

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-21738 Filed 9-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P