alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w3



 





Exhibit 10.3




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	ENGENIO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
	Notice of Grant of Stock Options
and Option Agreement

	 	ID: 94-1235045

1621 BARBER LANE	 	 	 	 
	 	 	MILPITAS, CALIFORNIA 95035
	

	 	Option Number:	 	 	 	 
	

	 	Plan:
	2004	 	 	 






Effective               , you have been granted a nonstatutory stock option to buy                shares of


ENGENIO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. common stock at an exercise price of
$    per share.



The total option price of the shares granted is $



The number of shares indicated are scheduled to become fully vested on the date
shown below. However, vesting will occur only if you have not incurred a
Termination of Service prior to such date. The latest this option will expire
is the Expiration Date shown below; however, if you incur a Termination of
Service, this option may expire sooner, as described in the attached ENGENIO
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Stock Option Agreement (the “Agreement”).
Capitalized terms that are not defined in this Notice of Grant or the Agreement
have the same meaning as in the ENGENIO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
referenced stock option plan.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Shares
	 	Vest Type
	 	Full Vest
	 	Expiration

	 

	 	 
	 	 
	 	 






By your signature below, you agree that these options are granted under and
governed by the terms and conditions of the Agreement (and the stock option
plan referenced therein), which is attached and made a part of this document.
You acknowledge that you have received, read and understand this Notice of
Grant, the Agreement and the ENGENIO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. referenced
stock option plan, and that you have had an opportunity to obtain the advice of
counsel prior to signing below. You agree to accept as binding, conclusive and
final all decisions or interpretations of the Administrator regarding any
questions relating to the ENGENIO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. referenced
stock option plan, this Notice of Grant and the Agreement.




	 	 	 
	
 

	 	
 
	

	 	Date







	 	 	 
	

	 	Date:
	

	 	Time:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2865 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2865

    To amend the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to make a 
technical correction relating to the amendments made by Public Law 113-
                                  243.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2015

 Mr. Sessions (for himself and Mr. McDermott) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to make a 
technical correction relating to the amendments made by Public Law 113-
                                  243.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Technical Clarification to Public 
Law 113-243 Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT RELATING TO ROLLOVER OF CERTAIN AIRLINE 
              PAYMENT AMOUNTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1106(a) of the FAA Modernization and 
Reform Act of 2012 (26 U.S.C. 408 note) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new paragraph:
            ``(6) Special rule for certain airline payment amounts.--In 
        the case of any amount which became an airline payment amount 
        by reason of the amendments made by section 1(b) of Public Law 
        113-243 (26 U.S.C. 408 note), paragraph (1) shall be applied by 
        substituting `(or, if later, within the period beginning on 
        December 18, 2014, and ending on the date which is 180 days 
        after the date of enactment of the Technical Clarification to 
        Public Law 113-243 Act of 2015)' for `(or, if later, within 180 
        days of the date of the enactment of this Act)'.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in Public Law 113-243 (26 U.S.C. 408 note).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                                Shareholding
                                                                                at Year End
                                                           Jurisdiction      ------------------
                Name of Subsidiary(1)                    of Incorporation    Direct    Indirect
-----------------------------------------------------    ----------------    ------    --------
<S>                                                      <C>                 <C>       <C>
Dresden Papier GmbH..................................        Germany           -         100%
Papierfabrik Fahrbrucke GmbH.........................        Germany           -         100%
Spezialpapierfabrik Blankenstein GmbH................        Germany           -         100%
Zellstoff-und Papierfabrik Rosenthal GmbH & Co. KG...        Germany           -         100%
Zellstoff Stendal GmbH...............................        Germany           -         63.6%
</Table>

----------
(1)  All the subsidiaries are conducting business under their own names.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 17

- 00157

- CR

Thurman Dehorney Jr.

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 431st District Court

o f Denton County (F16

- 2968

- 431 )

March 29 , 2018

Opin ion by Justice Meier

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 13

- 00902

- CV

IN RE Randolph JACKSON and Janet Meyers, Individually and as Heirs of the Estate of

Matthew Charles Jackson; and Erica Fitts, Individually and as Next Friend of Jasper Charles

Jackson, a Minor

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 17862

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 9, 2014

DIS MISSED

Appellant s ha ve filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion contains a certificate of

service to appellee s , who ha ve not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and

dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant s

.

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6295
DEAN R. MARTIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MELANIE C. PEREIRA, Deputy Commissioner of the Division of Corrections, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA97-409-S) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 21, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dean R. Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Martin v. Pereira , No. CA-97-409-S (D. Md. Feb. 13, 1997). We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 28, 2015

t0720

Order 

Clerk

July 28, 2015

150214

Estate of ANDREW BALL, JR.

__________________________________________

KAREN ELAINE KEYWORTH, Personal 

Representative for the Estate of ANDREW BALL,

JR. and ELAINE PULLEN BALL,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 150214

COA: 314861

Ct of Claims: 12-000128-MH

STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF 

MILITARY AND VETERANS’ AFFAIRS and

GRAND RAPIDS HOME FOR VETERANS,

Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 26, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

 9:00 a.m. EDT, Friday, September 27, 2024.

# PLACE:

 Virtual meeting.

# STATUS:

 Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                         Enforcement matters. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.cftc.gov/​.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-5964.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: September 18, 2024.

Robert Sidman,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2024-21710 Filed 9-18-24; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
#### Cipra, Appellant, *v.*Weiland et al., Appellees.

(No. 28821

Decided December 10, 1941.)

*129
      *Messrs. Davis & Yoimg*and *Mr. Robert L. Ross,*for appellant.

*Mr. Frank Stetson,*for appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged, *sua sponte,*that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2718 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow workers an abovethe-line deduction for union dues and expenses and to allow a miscellaneous itemized deduction for workers for all unreimbursed expenses incurred in the trade or business of being an employee. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 19, 2018 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, 

and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow workers an above-the-line deduction for union dues and expenses and to allow a miscellaneous itemized deduction 

for workers for all unreimbursed expenses incurred in 

the trade or business of being an employee. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Fairness for 

5 Workers Act’’. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2718 IS

1 SEC. 2. ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN EX2 PENSES OF THE TRADE OR BUSINESS OF 

3 BEING AN EMPLOYEE. 

4 (a) ABOVE-THE-LINE DEDUCTION FOR UNION DUES

5 AND EXPENSES.—Section 62(a)(1) of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following new sentence: ‘‘The limitation under the pre8 ceding sentence shall not apply to deductions which are 

9 attributable to a trade or business consisting of the per10 formance of services by the taxpayer as an employee if 

11 such deductions are for union dues and expenses.’’ 

12 (b) ALLOWANCE OF MISCELLANEOUS ITEMIZED DE13 DUCTION FOR OTHER EXPENSES OF THE TRADE OR

14 BUSINESS OF BEING AN EMPLOYEE.—Section 67(g) of 

15 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

16 (1) by striking ‘‘Notwithstanding subsection 

17 (a),’’ and inserting: 

18 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsection 

19 (a), except as provided in paragraph (2),’’; and 

20 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION FOR EXPENSES OF THE

22 TRADE OR BUSINESS OF BEING AN EMPLOYEE.— 

23 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) shall 

24 not apply to miscellaneous itemized deductions 

25 for any taxable year which are itemized deduc26 tions attributable to a trade or business carried 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2718 IS

1 on by the taxpayer which consists of the per2 formance of services by the taxpayer as an em3 ployee. 

4 ‘‘(B) APPLICATION OF 2-PERCENT TEST.— 

5 In applying subsection (a) for any taxable year 

6 to which this paragraph applies, only the 

7 itemized deductions described in subparagraph 

8 (A) shall be taken into account as miscellaneous 

9 itemized deductions.’’. 

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATES.— 

11 (1) ABOVE-THE-LINE DEDUCTION.—The 

12 amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to 

13 taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. 

14 (2) MISCELLANEOUS ITEMIZED DEDUCTIONS.— 

15 The amendment made by subsection (b) shall take 

16 effect as if included in the amendment made by sec17 tion 11045(a) of Public Law 115–97. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50928

Summary Calendar

__________________

RANDY LORINE CARROLL,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

VICTOR RODRIGUEZ; TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS &

PAROLES; JUDITH D. MILLER,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. MO-95-CV-106

- - - - - - - - - -

May 21, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Randy Lorine Carroll appeals the district court's dismissal

of his habeas corpus claims for failure to exhaust state remedies

and the court's dismissal as frivolous of his civil rights

claims. Carroll's petition is more properly construed as a

petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 rather than 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254. See United States v. Tubwell, 37 F.3d 175, 177 (5th Cir.

1994). The district court did not abuse its discretion by

dismissing the § 2241 petition for failure to exhaust. See
No. 95-50928 

-2-

Fuller v. Rich, 11 F.3d 61, 62 (5th Cir. 1994). Further, the

district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing

Carroll's civil rights claim as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(d). See Heck v. Humphrey, 114 S. Ct. 2364 (1994). 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Carroll's

motion to stay the appeal pending his exhaustion of state

remedies is DENIED.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT  32(B)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I,  Mitchell  Binder, Chief Financial Officer of Orbit International Corp.,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as enacted by  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     the  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,
2003  (the "Annual Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with
the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934;  and

     (2)     information  contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations of Orbit
International  Corp.

Dated:  March  29,  2004
                              /s/  Mitchell  Binder
                               --------------------
                              Mitchell  Binder
                              Chief  Financial  Officer

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Orbit International Corp. and will
be  retained  by  Orbit  International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001029715
<NAME>  Account Portfolios G.P. Inc
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                       538
<INVENTORY>                                     42,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,205
<PP&E>                                          44,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,699
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,683
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
| **CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) - $ / shares** | 3 Months Ended |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]**                                                      |           |   |
| Cash dividends on common stock (in dollars per share)                                                 | $ 0.26         | $ 0.22 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate dividends paid during the period for each share of common stock outstanding.
+ References
Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 505 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.3-04) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=27012166&loc=d3e187085-122770
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_CommonStockDividendsPerShareCashPaid**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**num:perShareItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_StatementOfStockholdersEquityAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 15

- 11120 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:14

- cr

- 00010

- RS

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus ROBERT LEESEAN WILLIAMS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida

________________________ ( January 11, 2016 )
Before WILSON , WILLIAM PRYOR and FAY , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 15-11120 Date Filed: 01/11/2016 Page: 1 of 22 Ric hard Summa, appointed appellate counsel for Robert Williams, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination o f the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williams’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case: 15-11120 Date Filed: 01/11/2016 Page: 2 of 2