alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# N / E / W / S   R / E / L / E / A / S / E

July 31, 2008

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE** For more information, contact:

Mark K. Hardwick, Executive Vice President/Chief Financial Officer, 765-751-1857 http://www.firstmerchants.com

SOURCE: First Merchants Corporation (Nasdaq: FRME), Muncie, Indiana

# FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION ANNOUNCES QUARTERLY CASH DIVIDEND

At its regularly scheduled meeting held on July 29, 2008, the Board of Directors of First Merchants Corporation declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.23 per share on its common stock.

The cash dividend is payable September 19, 2008, to stockholders of record September 5, 2008. For purposes of broker trading, the ex-date of the cash dividend is September 3, 2008.

About First Merchants Corporation

First Merchants Corporation is a financial holding company headquartered in Muncie, Indiana. Subsidiaries of the Corporation include First Merchants Bank, N.A., First Merchants Bank of Central Indiana, N.A., Lafayette Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Commerce National Bank and First Merchants Trust Company, N.A. The Corporation also operates First Merchants Insurance Services, a full-service property casualty, personal lines, and        healthcare insurance agency and is a majority member of Indiana Title Insurance Company, LLC, a title insurance agency.

First Merchants Corporation’s common stock is traded over-the-counter on the NASDAQ National Market System under the symbol FRME. Quotations are carried in daily newspapers and can be found on the company’s Internet web page (http://www.firstmerchants.com).

****
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THIS SCHEDULE.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      13,378,000
<SECURITIES>                                 6,065,000<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     83,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,957,000
<PP&E>                                       1,703,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                 483,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,782,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,075,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,713
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,610,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,782,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,000
<CGS>                                          158,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,443,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,090,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,393,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,090,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.30)
<FN>
<F1>SECURITIES, ITEM 5-02(2) ARE NET OF ACCRUED INTEREST AND UNREALIZED
GAIN/LOSS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00473-CR

Miranda HERRERA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR6351

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED September 21, 2016.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ValCom, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended  March  31,  2010  as  filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I,  Vincent Vellardita,
Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in  the  Report  fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required  by  Section  906 has been
provided to ValCom, Inc. and will be retained by ValCom, Inc. and furnished  to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

May 24, 2010


By: /s/  Vince Vellardita
Vince Vellardita
Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131615 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131615 

 COA: 259463 

Wayne CC: 04-006941-01

PAUL ANTHONY DAVIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 18, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
Exhibit 23(b)**[NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. LETTERHEAD]****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS**As oil and gas consultants, we hereby consent to the use of our name and our report dated October28, 2005, in this Form 10-K/A, incorporated by reference into Peoples Energy Corporation’s previouslyfiled Registration Statement File Nos. 333-84594 and 333-70702 on Form S-3, and 2-82760, 33-6369,033-63193, 333-62070, 333-113204, 333-116192 and 333-17701 on Form S-8.      NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         205,547
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  935,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,260,885
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,622,993
<PP&E>                                      21,023,260
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,552,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,561,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,686,170
<BONDS>                                     10,643,776
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,335
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,227,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,561,465
<SALES>                                      4,852,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,852,744
<CGS>                                        3,544,614
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,544,614
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,125,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             812,258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,178,369)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,178,369)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.23)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

GLUE WILKINS, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

HON. DANTE R. PELLIGRINI [SIC], 

COMMONWEALTH COURT, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 189 MM 2014 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 6th day of January, 2015, the Application or Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the “King’s Bench Matters” is DENIED. The 

Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
|    |                                                                                                                          |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|                             |
|-----------------------------|
|                             |  |  |
| DATED: August 13, 2013 |   | /s/ T. Michael Price |
|                        |   | T. Michael PricePresident and Chief Executive Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SAID FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      13,556,875
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,404
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,740,221
<PP&E>                                       1,125,599
<DEPRECIATION>                                 371,992
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,493,828
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          409,008
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            52   
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,084,768   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,084,820          
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,108,926
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,970,691
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (861,765)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (861,765)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (861,765)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (166.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### TURNER v. LARSON.

No. 4225.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.

May 7, 1934.

Rehearing Denied June 11, 1934.

*398Perry T. Brown, of Harwell, and A. D. Smith, of Friona, for appellant.

Sam Aldredge, of Harwell, for appellee..

JACKSON, Justice.

The appellee, a feme sole, as lessor, instituted this suit in the county court of Parmer county against the appellant, lessee, to recover $750 on a written lease duly executed by the parties.

The contract is. dated April 28, 1931, and leases to appellant the land therein described “for the term of thz'ee (3) years beginning the 15th day of May, A. D. 1931, and ending the 15th day of May, 1934, paying thereon the sum of Two Hundred Fifty ($250.00) Dollars, payable May 15th each year in advance.”

The appellant admitted that he executed the contract, took possession of the land by virtue thereof, occupied' and farmed it for one year, and had 'never., paid either of the rent installments.

Under these facts, .the appellee was entitled to a directed verdict for the sum recovered and appellant’s assignments attacking the charge of -the court as'erroneous are therefore immaterial.

In a erossraetion-filed by. appellant he alleged -that about August 1, 1932,- he was*-unlawfully and "illegally evicted from the premises by appfell'ée'and-tké'reby'suflieíed’damág-es'in the sum'of $1,920. That'’hilt"for 'sa'id eviction he would háve growrij harvested, and marketed a crop on the premises, at-the rea’sonable cost of $424, and that.the rent for the ■three years' >amounted-tO'$750. He deducted these -two'"items‘from 'the'$l,920''damages’he Claimed'he--hadsustained', aii’d’sought to re-‘édyer ágainst’appellee' a balance of '$746.'

The court was without jurisdiction, of the cross-action as alleged and correctly refused appellant any judgment thereon. Gimbel et al. v. Gomprecht et al., 89 Tex. 497, *35*S. W. 470.

The 'case was tried before a special Rdge, for"whicti reason the. appellant challenges the. validity ofthe. judgment, against ■ him.

The record-discld-ses by an agreement executed by the attorneys of .the parties that: “The duly, elected and.qualified county judge of Parmer County, Texas, was. .disqualified himself to hear and determiné this cause, Whereupon it is' agreed’ by' and'-between''the plaintiff and-the defendant in’’this cau’se that J. D. Thomas be' appointed'and he'is hereby appointed by said parties to try this- cause.”

J. D. Thomas took the oath of office-and tried the ease as special judge, after which appellant, for the first time in his motion for a new trial, claimed that the regularly elected and qualified judge was not- disqualified. This contention is not supported by any evidence offered either on the trial or on the hearing of said motion. It is an ex parte statement made by attorneys for appellant in their motion for a new trial, and hence, under the facts revealed by this record, cannot be sustained. Compere v. Girand (Tex. Civ. App.) 42 S.W.(2d) 278.

The Judgment is affirmed.
SCAP-19-0000372 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF HONOLULU and COMMON CAUSE,

P laintiffs-Appellants,

vs. STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I, Defendant-Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CAAP-19-0000372; CIVIL NO. 18-1-1376-09)

ORDER OF CORRECTION (By: Nakayama, J.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court, filed on November 4, 2021, is corrected as follows:

On page 66, the attorney credits are corrected to include Thomas Yamachika for amicus curiae Tax Foundation of Hawai ʻ i, as follows: Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-19-0000372 04-NOV-2021 02:35 PM Dkt. 59 OCORRobert Brian Black

(Lisa Emily Engebretsen with him on the briefs) for plaintiffs-appellants League of Women Voters of Honolulu and Common Cause Clare E. Connors (Kimberly Tsumoto Guidry on the briefs) for defendant-appellee State of Hawai ʻ i Thomas Yamachika for amicus curiae Tax Foundation of Hawai ʻ i Colleen Hanabusa for amicus curiae Hawaiʻ i State Legislature Robert H. Thomas for amicus curiae Grassroot Institute of Hawaii The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of this change.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, November 4, 2021. /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Associate Justice

2
#### FAIRBANKS et al. v. DENNETT MOTOR SALES CO.

No. 8969.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Jan. 18, 1933.

G. D. Fairbanks, of Brownsville, for appellants.

West *&*Hightower, of Brownsville, for ap-pellee.

SMITH, J.

This action was brought against Margaret McAllen Fairbanks and her husband, G. D. Fairbanks (joined pro forma) to recover upon a garage bill for goods and services alleged to have been furnished Mrs. Fairbanks for the benefit of her separate estate, or, in the alternative, as necessaries. The jury found in response to the one issue submitted to them that “the items sued for by plaintiff herein" were necessaries for defendants’ family.” There was no finding that the debt so contracted was “reasonable and proper,” as provided in article 4624, R. S. 1925.

In response to the jury finding the court rendered judgment against both defendants, and directed issuance of execution against the separate estate of Mrs. Fairbanks or the community estate of the latter and her husband, at the option of the plaintiff. The Fairbanks have appealed.

Article 4624, R. S. 1925, is as follows: “Upon the trial of any suit as provided for in the preceding article, if it shall appear to the satisfaction of the court and jury that the debts so contracted or expenses so incurred were for the purposés enumerated in said article, *and also that the (Letts so contracted or expenses so incurred were reasonable and proper,*the court shall decree that execution may be levied upon either the common property or the separate property of the wife at the discretion of the plaintiff.” (Italics ours.)

We are of the opinion that, in view of the provisions of the statute, appellee could not properly have execution against the community estate of the Fairbanks without a finding that the debt sued on was “reasonable and proper.” Article 4624; Speer’s Law of Mar. Rts. § 153; Harris v. Williams, 44 Tex. 124. The burden of eliciting such finding rested upon appellee, who, failing to meet that burden, was not entitled to recover.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022243EN.01005701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 27.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/57 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10785 – ICG / KONECTA / COMDATA)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 243/09)

1.

On 17 June 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022243EN.01005701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Intermediate Capital Group, plc (‘ICG’, United Kingdom), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Grupo Konectanet, S.L.U (‘Konecta’, Spain), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Comdata, S.p.A (‘Comdata’, Italy). |

ICG will aquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Konecta and Comdata.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | ICG is an investment firm and asset manager, with presence in Europe, Asia Pacific and the USA, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Konecta is a business process outsourcing services provider in Europe and Latin America. Konecta is currently jointly controlled by ICG, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Comdata is a business process outsourcing services provider with activities in Africa, Europe and Latin America. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022243EN.01005701-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10785 – ICG / KONECTA / COMDATA

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022243EN.01005701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022243EN.01005701-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---