alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022031EN.01000501.xml

| 21.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10422 – WMG / BLACKROCK GROUP / INFLUENCE MEDIA / THE INITIAL FUND)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 31/03)

On 12 January 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10422. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10422. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 99.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Levcor
International, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert A. Levinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


By: /s/ ROBERT A. LEVINSON
    --------------------------
     Name:  Robert A. Levinson
     Title: Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


March 27, 2003
# C_2022233EN.01002901.xml

| 16.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/29

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 233/06)

Decision granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2022) 3678 | 9 June 2022 | Chromium trioxide
  EC No. 215-607-8, CAS No. 1333-82-0
  Sodium dichromate
  EC No. 234-190-3, CAS No. 7789-12-0, 10588-01-9 | Tata Steel IJmuiden B.V., Wenckebachstraat 1, 1951 JZ Velsen-Noord, The Netherlands | REACH/22/24/0 | Use of chromium trioxide for passivation of electrolytic tinplate (ETP) | 31 December 2027 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |
| REACH/22/24/1 | Use of sodium dichromate for passivation of electrolytic tinplate (ETP) |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2022) 3678

9 June 2022

Chromium trioxide

EC No. 215-607-8, CAS No. 1333-82-0

Sodium dichromate

EC No. 234-190-3, CAS No. 7789-12-0, 10588-01-9

Tata Steel IJmuiden B.V., Wenckebachstraat 1, 1951 JZ Velsen-Noord, The Netherlands

REACH/22/24/0

Use of chromium trioxide for passivation of electrolytic tinplate (ETP)

31 December 2027

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

REACH/22/24/1

Use of sodium dichromate for passivation of electrolytic tinplate (ETP)

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu)

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 5, 2023

No. 04-22-00193-CV

Alfonso TREVINO, III, individually and Alfonso Trevino, III, as representative and beneficiary 

of Estate of Geraldine Trevino, and Alfonso Trevino, III, A/N/F of minors C.T. and A.T., IV, 

beneficiaries of Estate of Geraldine Trevino,

Appellant

v.

Alejandro OROZCO, Jr. and City of San Antonio,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI17867

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellee’s (City of San Antonio) Unopposed Second Motion for Extension of Time 

to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is due January 27, 2023. No further 

extensions absent extenuating circumstances.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of January, 2023.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Parts 1 and 64
          - [WC Docket No. 24-213; MD Docket No. 10-234; FCC 24-85; FR ID 245867]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Communications Commission published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of September 12, 2024, proposing changes to procedural steps filers must take in the Robocall Mitigation Database. The document contained an incorrectly identified docket. This document corrects the misidentified docket, GN Docket No. 24-213, to the correct docket, WC Docket No. 24-213.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Erik Beith, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-0756, or email:                         *erik.beith@fcc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    1. In the                     **Federal Register**                     of September 12, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024-20176, on page 74184, in the second column, under document headings, correct the identified docket to read: [WC Docket No. 24-213; MD Docket No. 10-234; FCC 24-85; FR ID 240720]                

                    2. In the third column, in the                     **Supplementary Information**                     section, in the first sentence, correct “GN Docket No. 24-213” to read “WC Docket No. 24-213.”                

Federal Communications Commission.

Marlene Dortch,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2024-21642 Filed 9-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Exhibit 24.1
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
  (1)
    
    To execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigneds
capacity as a director and/or officer of Spartech Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the Company), Form 10-K in accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules thereunder;(2)
    
    To do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned
which may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 10-K
complete and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such
form with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock
exchange or similar authority; and(3)
    
    To take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to,
in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being
understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the
undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall
contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such
attorney-in-facts discretion.
   th
 /s/ Ralph B. AndySignatureRalph B.
Andy
Print Name
**Docket No. FAA -**  **2012 -**  **0188**
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement onForm S-8 (No. 333-97863) of CytoCore, Inc. of our report datedMarch 28,2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of  CytoCore, Inc. as ofDecember 31, 2007 andthe related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, andcash flows for the year ended December 31, 2007, which  appears  on page F-1 in this 2007annual report on Form 10-KSB  for the yearended December 31, 2007./s/ L JSoldinger Associates, LLCDeer Park,Illinois
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 21
                    SUBSIDIARIES OF MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  SHAREHOLDING
                                                                                 AT END OF YEAR
                                                            JURISDICTION       -------------------
                NAME OF SUBSIDIARY(1)                     OF INCORPORATION     DIRECT     INDIRECT
-----------------------------------------------------     ----------------     ------     --------
<S>                                                       <C>                  <C>        <C>
Dresden Papier GmbH..................................         Germany             -         100%
Papierfabrik Fahrbrucke GmbH.........................         Germany             -         100%
Spezialpapierfabrik Blankenstein GmbH................         Germany             -         100%
Zellstoff-und Papierfabrik Rosenthal GmbH & Co. KG...         Germany             -         100%
</TABLE>

----------
(1)  All the subsidiaries are conducting business under their own names.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This financial data schedule  contains summary  financial  information as of and
for the six months  ended June 30, 1999,  which is extracted  from the Condensed
Consolidated  Balance Sheets,  Statements of Operations,  and Statements of Cash
Flows, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the financial statements
within the report of Form 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001012704
<NAME> UGLY DUCKLING CORP
<MULTIPLIER>                                                 1,000

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                       1,302
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              423,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                                95,421
<INVENTORY>                                                 37,810
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                      45,684
<DEPRECIATION>                                              10,934
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             465,177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                        19
<OTHER-SE>                                                 159,376
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               465,177
<SALES>                                                    204,319
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           255,850
<CGS>                                                      115,656
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            72,334
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            55,196
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           9,473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              3,191
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 1,301
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          1,890
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 1,890
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.12



</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-18-00329-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JORGE A. ARJONA AND MARTINA ARJONA, Appellants,

v.

INTERNATIONAL BANK, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

On June 22, 2018, a notice of appeal was filed identifying Jorge A. Arjona and 

Martina Arjona as the appellants; however, the notice of appeal is only signed by Jorge 

A. Arjona. Jorge A. Arjona is not an attorney, therefore he is not legally permitted to 

represent or otherwise file pleadings on behalf of another person. See TEX. GOV'T CODE 

ANN. § 81.101 (West, Westlaw through 2017, 1st C.S.); Id. § 81.102 (West, Westlaw 
2

through 2017, 1st C.S.); Crain v. The Unauthorized Practice of Law Comm, of the Sup.Ct. 

of Tex., 11 S.W.3d 328, 332–34 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. 

denied). Accordingly, Jorge A. Arojona can represent himself pro se, but he cannot act 

as an attorney for Martina Arjona. 

On June 27, 2018, this Court notified Jorge A. Arona that it appeared he is not a 

licensed attorney and is therefore prohibited from representing Martina Arjona. The 

notice directed appellants to file an amended notice of appeal signed by Martina Arjona. 

On August 14, 2018, appellants were again advised to file an amended notice of appeal 

within ten days, otherwise, the appeal would be dismissed as to Martina Arjona. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),(c). An amended notice of appeal has not been filed. 

Accordingly, Martina Arjona is not a party to this appeal. 

On July 12, 2018 and August 14, 2018, the Clerk of this Court notified Jorge A. 

Arijona, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would 

dismiss this appeal unless the $205.00 filing fee was paid. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). 

Appellant has not responded to the notice from the Clerk or paid the $205.00 filing fee. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 12.1(b).

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to pay 

the filing fee, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See id. 42.3(b),(c). 

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.

GINA M. BENAVIDES,

Justice

Delivered and filed the

27th day of September, 2018.
<i;> u-^ -

3-010 

January 12,2011 

:F;^ARTMENTOF 

;'.N3P0RTATI0M 

::[:l OPERATIONS 

m !3 P 3: U2 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Contmuation of Alaska Airlines' Essential Ai/Service at Cordova. Gustavus. Petersburg. Wrangell. and 

Yakutat Alaska. Docket OST-1998-4899 V 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

Please let me add my support for the selection of Alaska Airlines to provide Essential Air Service. As you may 

know Cordova is a small, remote Alaskan community that relies heavily on air service for access to other 

communities in Alaska as well as to the Lower 48 states and to Hawaii. Many of the people who live in Cordova 

travel frequently and need this air service oAen for even their basic needs. 

We do have the Marine Highway, but it is not available on a daily basis and therefore, the air service provided by 

Alaska Airlines is extremely essential to our community. We must rely on air service to access health care providers 

with specialties or for ongoing treatments such as chemotherapy. We are dependent on air service for 

coRununication with providers of specific licenses which are required of many in our workforce. People must travel 

to Anchorage or to Juneau for many services that would otherwise not be available to them. 

The impact on our community if the essential air service provided by Alaska Airlines is not provided would be 

keenly felt. Many of our basic goods in addition to services arrive via air. We have certain groceries that would 

otherwise be unavailable to us without air service. 

Furthermore, the type of aircraft flown by Alaska Airlines is equipped with the Required Navigation Performance 

Technology precision technology enables the airiine to reliably access the airport during inclement weather which is 

frequent. It thus reduces diversions and cancellations and provides for dependability in the delivery of both people 

and products to Cordova. Alaska's jet service is crucial to the economic and emotional well being of our 

community. 

For these reasons, I urge DOT to select Alaska Airlines to continue to provide essential air service to Southcentral 

and Southeast Alaska. The airline has done this successfully for more than thirty years. 

Sincerely, 

Susan Harding 

Campus Coordinator, Cordova 

Prince William Sound Community College 

cc: Susan Kurland, Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

The Honorable Sean Pamell, Governor, State of Alaska 

Marc A. Luiken, Commissioner, Alaska State Department of Transportation and Public Facilities
# C_2022189EN.01006901.xml

| 10.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/69

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10676 – NEXT / WP / PINK)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 189/02)

On 21 April 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10676. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10676. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
May 29, 2012

Mr. Patrick T. Tarmey Paramotor Tours, LLC 205 Highland Avenue Salem, MA 01970

Dear Mr. Tarmey:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from part 103 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulati ons (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 18, 2012, exemption request on behalf of Paramotor Tours, LLC into the public docket (No. FAA-2012-0554), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you m ust send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we receive this required information from you. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure