alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022269EN.01002501.xml

| 13.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/25

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10755 – ADVENT / IRCA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 269/03)

On 5 July 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10755. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10755. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2022085EN.01000301.xml

| 22.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10555 – ADIA / TRANSURBAN / AUSTRALIANSUPER / CPP INVESTMENTS / WCX)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 85/03)

On 8 February 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10555. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10555. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION  I, Ted R. Sharp, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   Date:  November 14, 2007  By:   /s/ Ted R. Sharp Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.      1
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

 38.5

 39.0

 39.5

 40.0

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/04

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 04 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

★

■ ■ ■

■

★

●

●

★

● ● ● ●
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the
year ended December 31, 2010 (Form 10-K), I, Christopher P. Johns, President of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



| | (1) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



CHRISTOPHER P. JOHNSCHRISTOPHER P. JOHNSPresident


February 17, 2011



---

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (Form 10-K), I, Sara A. Cherry, Vice President,
Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



| | (1) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SARA A. CHERRYSARA A. CHERRYVice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer


February 17, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,722
<SECURITIES>                                     5,392
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,448
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     17,697
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,116
<PP&E>                                         351,828
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 455,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116,156
<BONDS>                                        233,163
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        99,038
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,982
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   455,845
<SALES>                                        125,570
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,867
<CGS>                                          117,314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  164,884
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (37,017)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,092
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (38,109)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (38,109)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.33)


</TABLE>
# C_2022485EN.01009201.xml

| 21.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 485/92 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 485/92

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10932 – ZF / HELLA / NGK / CLARIOS / AHEAD JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 485/03)

On 14 December 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10932. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10932. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022390EN.01000401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 11.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/4 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10887 – INEOS / SINOPEC / JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 390/04)

1.

On 30 September 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022390EN.01000401-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | INEOS AG (‘INEOS’, Switzerland), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation (‘SINOPEC’, China), state owned enterprise, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | INEOS Sinopec HDPE (Tianjin) Limited (‘INEOS Sinopec HDPE (Tianjin)’, China), newly created joint venture, controlled by INEOS and SINOPEC. |

INEOS and SINOPEC will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of INEOS Sinopec HDPE (Tianjin).

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | INEOS is is a privately owned conglomerate that produces a range of chemicals including petrochemicals, specialty chemicals and oil products, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | SINOPEC is a petroleum and petrochemical group headquartered in Beijing. |

3.

The business activities of INEOS Sinopec HDPE (Tianjin) will be the following: to develop, construct and operate a high-density polyethylene plant in the People’s Republic of China.

4.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022390EN.01000401-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

5.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10887 – INEOS / SINOPEC / JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022390EN.01000401-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022390EN.01000401-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

September 8, 2005

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-11183

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-80115-CR-DMM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

JOHNNY LEE MOYE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(September 8, 2005)

Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Lee Moye appeals his 180-month sentence for possession of a
2

firearm by a felon. Moye argues that his right to a jury trial under the Sixth

Amendment was violated when the district court, as a matter of law, determined

that Moye’s admitted previous convictions were qualifying offenses for the

purpose of enhancing Moye’s sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act.

Because the determination that Moye’s previous convictions were qualifying

offenses was a question of law for the court, we affirm. 

We review Moye’s sentence de novo, but will reverse only for harmful error.

United States v. Paz, 405 F.3d 946, 948-49 (11th Cir. 2005).

Moye pleaded guilty to one count of possession of a firearm by a felon. 18

U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Moye’s admitted previous convictions include attempted

burglary, sale of cocaine, sale of marijuana, and resisting an officer with violence.

The district court concluded that these previous convictions qualified Moye as an

armed career criminal. Under section 922(g)(1), the statutory maximum term of

imprisonment is 120 months, but under the mandatory minimum sentence

provision of the Armed Career Criminal Act, a defendant with three qualifying

convictions is subject to a minimum sentence of 180 months. 18 U.S.C. § 924(e).

Because Moye has at least three qualifying previous convictions, the district court

sentenced him under section 924(e). 

Although he admits his previous convictions, Moye argues that the district
3

court violated his right to a jury trial under the Sixth Amendment when the court

determined that his previous convictions were qualifying offenses for an enhanced

sentence under section 924(e). In Moye’s view, the question whether a previous

conviction is a qualifying offense for the purpose of sentence enhancement is a

factual question for the jury, not the court. Moye is wrong. 

Whether a previous conviction is a qualifying offense under section 924(e)

is a question of law for the court. See Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. __, 125 S.

Ct. 1254 (2005). Although the Supreme Court has limited the sources to which a

judge may look in determining whether a previous conviction is a qualifying

offense under section 924(e), id. at __, 125 S. Ct. at 1257, Moye does not argue

that the district court looked beyond those sources in sentencing him as an armed

career criminal. The district court did not err. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Robert L. Parker Jr.Robert L. Parker Jr.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
II 

Calendar No. 22 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 249 

[Report No. 115–8] 

To provide that the pueblo of Santa Clara may lease for 99 years certain 

restricted land, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2017 

Mr. UDALL (for himself and Mr. HEINRICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

MARCH 22, 2017 

Reported by Mr. HOEVEN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To provide that the pueblo of Santa Clara may lease for 

99 years certain restricted land, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 249 RS

1 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF PUEBLO OF SANTA CLARA 

2 LAND ELIGIBLE FOR 99-YEAR LEASE. 

3 Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of Au4 gust 9, 1955 (commonly known as the ‘‘Long-Term Leas5 ing Act’’) (25 U.S.C. 415(a)), is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘Indians,,’’ and inserting ‘‘Indi7 ans,’’; 

8 (2) by inserting ‘‘Ohkay Owingeh pueblo,’’ after 

9 ‘‘Cochiti,’’; 

10 (3) by inserting ‘‘the pueblo of Santa Clara,’’ 

11 after ‘‘Pojoaque,’’; 

12 (4) by striking ‘‘the the lands’’ and inserting 

13 ‘‘the land’’; 

14 (5) by striking ‘‘lands held in trust for the 

15 Pueblo of Santa Clara,’’; and 

16 (6) by striking ‘‘lands held in trust for Ohkay 

17 Owingeh Pueblo’’. 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

Calendar No. 22 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 249 

[Report No. 115–8] 

A BILL 

To provide that the pueblo of Santa Clara may 

other purposes. lease for 99 years certain restricted land, and for 

MARCH 22, 2017 

Reported without amendment 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |  |  |
| Delaware                                       | 0-17948 | 94-2838567 |
| (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation) | (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| o      | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|   |   |
| o      | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|   |   |
| o      | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |
| o      | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

|             |
|-------------|
|             |  |  |
| Exhibit No. |   | Description |
| 3.2         |   | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Electronic Arts Inc., as amended on May 19, 2016. |

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
|   |   | ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. |
|   |   |   |   |
| Dated: | May 27, 2016 | By: | /s/ Jacob J. Schatz |
|   |   |   | Jacob J. Schatz |
|   |   |   | Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |

----

|             |
|-------------|
|             |  |  |
| Exhibit No. |   | Description |
| 3.2         |   | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Electronic Arts Inc., as amended on May 19, 2016. |