alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022241EN.01000101.xml

| 24.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9934 – KINGSPAN / TERASTEEL-WETTERBEST)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 241/01)

On 12 January 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M9934. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M9934. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51307 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OBERLIN MOLINA-NINO, also known as Oberlin Molina-Cerda, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-1261-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Oberlin MolinaNino raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit      32(b)**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company,                Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Thomas A. Nardi          |   | December                14, 2006 |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                                        |   | Date                             |
| Thomas                A. Nardi              |   |                             |
| Executive                Vice President and |   |                             |
| Chief                Financial Officer of   |   |                             |
| Peoples                Energy Corporation   |   |                             |

| /s/                Thomas A. Nardi                    |   | December                14, 2006 |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                                                  |   | Date                             |
| Thomas                A. Nardi                        |   |                             |
| Executive                Vice President and           |   |                             |
| Chief                Financial Officer of             |   |                             |
| The                Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company |   |                             |

| /s/                Thomas A. Nardi          |   | December                14, 2006 |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                                        |   | Date                             |
| Thomas                A. Nardi              |   |                             |
| Executive                Vice President and |   |                             |
| Chief                Financial Officer of   |   |                             |
| North                Shore Gas Company      |   |                             |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 299 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-619, CP2024-627.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21312 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 6, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail & Parcel Select Contract 11 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-631, CP2024-640.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21329 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2022350EN.01000101.xml

| 13.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 350/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 350/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10714 – VGRD / ASSETS OF AUTO-HOLDING DRESDEN)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 350/01)

On 22 June 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10714. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10714. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In re: HOWARD PHILLIPS,

Petitioner. PAGE TRUE, Warden; UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE,

Real Parties in Interest. No. 97-646

ORDER Filed January 6, 1998 Before ANDERSON, BALDOCK, and HENRY, Circuit Judges
.

This is an original proceeding in the nature of man damus. Petitioner seeks: 1) leave to proceed in this court without prepaymen t of costs or fees and 2) an order compelling the district court to hear and dec ide his pending petition for writ of habeas corpus, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2 241, case No. 95-CV-3465.- 2 - I. We consider first the application for leave to proc eed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended by the Pri son Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), prisoners proceeding in forma pauperis who bring a “civil action” or appeal a judgment from a civil action must pay a ll filing fees. United States v. Simmonds , 111 F.3d 737, 741 (10th Cir. 1997). We decided i n Simmonds , id. at 744, consistent with other circuits that have ad dressed the issue, that “neither habeas corpus or 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceedings, nor appeals of those proceedings are ‘civil actions’ for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 191 5.” Shortly thereafter, we added to the category of proceedings not covered bythe PLRA mandatory fee requirements those petitions for writs of habea s corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. McIntosh v. United States Parole Comm’n , 115 F.3d 809, 812 (10th Cir. 1997) (§ 2241 proceedings and appeals of those proceedings not “civil actions” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and(b)). Upon further consideration of the matter, we now co nclude that this circuit will no longer require mandatory fees under the PLRA for filing petitions for writs of mandamus seeking to compel district courts to hear and decide actions brought solely under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241, 2254 and 22 55. To the limited extent1 We have circulated this opinion to the en banc court, which has concurred with

this ruling. - 3 - that any of our earlier cases could be interpreted to the contrary, they are overruled. 1 We have examined the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis under the appropriate standards, see McIntosh , 115 F.3d at 812-13, and conclude petitioner has met the requisite criteria. Accordi ngly, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

II. Moving to the merits of the mandamus petition, we n ote that the district court’s docket sheet reflects the underlying habeas corpus petition was filed in November of 1995. It further appears that the caus e has been pending, at issue, since the filing of the government’s answer in Apri l of 1996. We have previously held that without more, this is too long for a habe as corpus petition to remain unresolved.- 4 -

Accordingly, the real parties in interest, other th an petitioner, are directed to respond to the petition. The district court jud ge to whom the case is assigned may also respond, if he is so inclined. The respon ses shall be filed within twenty days of the date of this order.

Entered for the Court PATRICK FISHER, Clerk
#### POTEN et al. v. LOCKHART, State Treasurer.

No. 7356.

Supreme Court of Texas.

March 16, 1938.

*220Thomas E. Lyon and M. L. Roark, both of San Antonio, for relators.

William McCraw, Atty. Gen., and W. J. Kemp and H. L. Williford, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.

SHARP, Justice.

Relators seek by mandamus to compel respondent to pay them the aggregate sum of $2,240.09, decreed to them in a judgment rendered in the county court of Bexar county, Tex., in cause No. 20677, styled Estate of John Poten, Deceased.

Relators base their claim for writ of mandamus on the ground that certain funds were paid to the State Treasurer by virtue of articles 3644 to 3660, Vernon’s Annotated Texas Civil Statutes, to which they are now entitled. The facts are undisputed. Relators have fully complied with the law, and are entitled to be paid the sums of money claimed by them.

The questions presented here are similar to those presented in Henry J. Manion, Relator, v. Charley Lockhart, Treasurer of the State of Texas, Respondent, 114 S.W.2d 216, in which cause an opinion has this day been rendered by this court. For the reasons stated in that opinion, relators’ petition for mandamus is denied.
Order entered October 3 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00650 - CV SARAH BUCKLEW, Appellant

V. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, AS TRUSTEE FOR CIT FOR CIT HOME

EQUITY LOAN TRUST 20 03 - 1, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 19 - 01018 - C



### O RDER The reporter’s record in this case is overdue. After we notified appellant the reporter’s record had not bee n filed because appellant had not requested the record, on September 26, 2019 appellant requested the reporter’s record be prepared. Because our records indicate appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, we ORDER the reporter’s record to be filed by October 26, 2019

. Further, the Court is in receipt of appellant’s September 30, 2019, October 1, 2019, and October 2, 2019 letters to J ustice Whitehill complaining about the Court’s order regarding the record in this case , as well as other v arious complaints regarding her case . We caution appellantthat it is improper to communicate with Justices on this Court regarding a case. See T EX . R. A PP .

P. 9.6. All communications regarding this case should be directed to the Clerk of the Court. Id

. /s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
envoy 

February 23, 2016 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Attn: U.S. Department of Transportation Dockets 

400 7th Street, SW, Plaza 401 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Exemption No. 7252G 

Envoy Air Inc., Certificate No. SIMA586A requests an extension to Exemption 7252G 

from 14 CFR 121.434(c)(1)(ii), which expires on June 30, 2016. All conditions and 

limitations will remain the same. 

Sincerely, 

Captain Edwin Korzun 

Manager of Flight Standards 

Envoy Air Inc. 

Cc: Benoit Lefargue 

Envoy Air Inc. • 4301 Regent Blvd• MD 311 EHQ •Irving, TX 75063
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,785
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,519
<PP&E>                                          67,870
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 130,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,413
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     37,096
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,401)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   130,620
<SALES>                                         55,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,115
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,565
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,046
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,952)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       431
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,383)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,383)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 183 (Friday, September 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 77110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21710]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  9:00 a.m. EDT, Friday, September 27, 2024.

PLACE:  Virtual meeting.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Enforcement matters. In the event that the 
time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the 
change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will 
be posted on the Commission's website at https://www.cftc.gov/.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-
5964.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: September 18, 2024.
Robert Sidman,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-21710 Filed 9-18-24; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2936 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2936

   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to treat infant 
         formula as adulterated if its use-by date has passed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2015

   Ms. Meng introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to treat infant 
         formula as adulterated if its use-by date has passed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Infant Formula Protection Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. EXPIRED INFANT FORMULA.

    (a) Adulteration.--Section 412(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 350a(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``, or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) such infant formula's use-by date, as specified in 
        the formula's labeling in accordance with section 107.20 of 
        title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor 
        regulations) has passed.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
beginning on the date that is 6 months after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------






               Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. & Subsidiaries
                    Certification Of Chief Financial Officer
           Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on form 10-Q for the three and six-month periods ended June 30,
2005, James DeAngelis hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of his knowledge:

         (1)  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents,
              in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.



Date:    August 22, 2005


/s/ James M. DeAngelis
----------------------
James M. DeAngelis
Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer