alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Epner Technology Inc.

Close Loop for Zero Waste Water Discharge

By Stephen V. Candiloro

May 17, 2012

## What’s the Difference?

• Zero Discharge?

• Closed Loop?

## Zero Discharge

• Zero Discharge is a plating plant or manufacturing plant is the same thing.....

• Nothing goes to Waste.... Here are some examples: Paper, Cardboard, Oil, Metal, Metal Salts, Antifreeze, Light Bulbs, Glass, Wood, Cement, Office Tools, Water....

• All is recycled.

## Closed Loop

• Closed Loop is a system where process waste is returned back to the process to be reused.• The type of closed loop system E.T.I. uses is a Vacuum Distillation (V.D.) unit. What this unit
does is distils the brown water or waste water
and sends the clean or distilled water back to the process and the concentrate that is left behind gets filtered to remove the precipitate. The effluent from the filter press goes back to be distilled again and the precipitate gets recycled.• E.T.I. also “Cogenerates” our own electricity. What this means is we use electricity from the generator but we also use the waste heat from the generator.• Hence “Cogeneration”

.

• The generator runs on natural gas, it is a straight eight, slow turn engine. It puts out 175 kw at 1200 rpm. We also have a 250kw diesel generator which is our backup for the natural gas engine.• We get a discount on our rate from the gas company because we have the ability to switch to a different fuel when natural gas demand is high.• E.T.I. not only uses the electricity, but it also uses the heat from the generator to operate
our vacuum distillation unit. This makes for an economical energy supply for out Vacuum
Distillation Unit.• How the vacuum distillation unit works.

• There are five circuits in the unit.

• 1. Waste Treatment Circuit

• 2. Clean Water Circuit

• 3. Waste Evaporation Circuit

• 4. Cooling Circuit

• 5. Heating Circuit

## CASTion Vacuum Distillation Unit

## Waste Evaporation Circuit

## Clean Water Circuit

## Waste Treatment Circuit

## Cooling Circuit

## Heating Circuit

### The End
EXHIBIT 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   Date:   May 21, 2007   By   /s/ Ted R. Sharp  Ted R, Sharp, Chief Financial Officer          1
| **Business Combinations (Narrative) (Details)** | 12 Months Ended |
|-------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| **Business Acquisition [Line Items]**           |            |   |   |
| Number of Businesses Acquired                   | 0               | 0 | 1 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Line items represent financial concepts included in a table. These concepts are used to disclose reportable information associated with domain members defined in one or many axes to the table.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_BusinessAcquisitionLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
The number of businesses acquired by the entity during the period.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_NumberOfBusinessesAcquired**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:integerItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
# C_2022082EN.01002001.xml

| 18.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/20

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2022/C 82/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 4.11.2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.59209 |
| Member State | Finland |
| Region | Finland |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | COVID-19: Maatalouden alkutuotannon yritysten väliaikainen tuki |
| Legal basis | Valtionavustuslaki 688/2001 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 70 000 000 EUR
  Annual budget: 48 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | 0 % |
| Duration | Until 30.6.2021 |
| Economic sectors | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | ELY-keskus |
| PL 1000, 50101 Mikkeli (Keha-keskus) |

Date of adoption of the decision

4.11.2020

Aid number

SA.59209

Member State

Finland

Region

Finland

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

COVID-19: Maatalouden alkutuotannon yritysten väliaikainen tuki

Legal basis

Valtionavustuslaki 688/2001

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 70 000 000 EUR

Annual budget: 48 000 000 EUR

Intensity

0 %

Duration

Until 30.6.2021

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

ELY-keskus

PL 1000, 50101 Mikkeli (Keha-keskus)

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CAFETERIA
OPERATORS, L.P. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 27,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-2000
<CASH>                                           2,310
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,149
<ALLOWANCES>                                        14
<INVENTORY>                                      6,978
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,837
<PP&E>                                         118,495
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,889
<BONDS>                                         52,473
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,513)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,377
<SALES>                                         95,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                95,952
<CGS>                                           28,225
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                61,728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 172
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,827
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,827
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,827
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 16383.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 10, 1934.

W. B. Howard, of Childress, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is selling intoxicating liquor; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The first count of the indictment charged appellant with selling intoxicating liquor, and in the third count it was averred that appellant possessed intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale. Both counts were submitted in the charge of the court. The verdict of the jury was as follows: “We the jury find the defendant R. R. Johnson guilty under the first and third counts of the indictment, and assess his punishment at confinement in the state penitentiary for two years.” The judgment condemned appellant to be guilty of the two felonies charged, and adjudged that he be punished by confinement in the penitentiary for an indeterminate sentence of not less than one nor more than two years. The sentence followed the judgment.

That a conviction cannot be had for two felonies in one indictment is well settled. Wooten v. State, 111 Tex. Cr. R. 524, 15 S.W.(2d) 635, and authorities cited; Luttrell v. State, 116 Tex. Cr. R. 277, 31 S.W.(2d) 818; Comer v. State, 120 Tex. Cr. R. 113, 47 S.W.(2d) 615. In the present case the verdict spe: cifieally found appellant guilty of two felon*296ies: (1) Possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; and (2) selling intoxicating liquor. If the court below had undertaken to enter a judgment condemning appellant to be guilty of only one of such felonies, it would have ignored the specific finding of the •jury upon the other felony, which the trial court would have no right to do. Wooten v. State, supra. This court cannot, under the guise of reforming the judgment, ignore a part of the verdict and do that which the trial court toad no authority to do.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined toy the judges of the' Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
# C_2022327EN.01000301.xml

| 30.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10814 – HEDIN / MOTOR-CAR)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 327/03)

On 22 August 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10814. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10814. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary information extracted from the
Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001013554
<NAME> PARK BANCORP, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             923
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          10,054
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     49,456
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          44,253
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            43,849
<LOANS>                                         65,339
<ALLOWANCE>                                        500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 176,732
<DEPOSITS>                                     128,062
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,126
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 176,732
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,007
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,218
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,225
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,665
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,693
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,532
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,005
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,005
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       507
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.37
<LOANS-NON>                                        270
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   573
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       73
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  500
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            500
        

</TABLE>
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/16

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.54 N 76.62 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■

■ ■

■

★

●

●

●

●

★ ●

● ●

●
# C_2022306EN.01004201.xml

| 11.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 306/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 306/42

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10633 – SUEZ / ACEA / JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 306/08)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Suez S.A. (‘Suez’, France), |
| --- | --- |

—

Suez S.A. (‘Suez’, France),

| — | Acea S.p.A. (‘Acea’, Italy), |
| --- | --- |

—

Acea S.p.A. (‘Acea’, Italy),

| — | JV (Italy). |
| --- | --- |

—

JV (Italy).

Suez and Acea will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of JV.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

| — | Suez is actve globally in the provision of water management services, production and distribution of potable water and wastewater recovery for public customers. Suez is also active in the collection, sorting, recycling disposal and treatment of waste, as well as in the provision urban development services, |
| --- | --- |

—

Suez is actve globally in the provision of water management services, production and distribution of potable water and wastewater recovery for public customers. Suez is also active in the collection, sorting, recycling disposal and treatment of waste, as well as in the provision urban development services,

| — | Acea is active in Italy in the provision of integrated water services, the distribution of electricity, public and artistic lighting, the sale of electricity and natural gas, energy production, waste disposal and energy recovery from waste. |
| --- | --- |

—

Acea is active in Italy in the provision of integrated water services, the distribution of electricity, public and artistic lighting, the sale of electricity and natural gas, energy production, waste disposal and energy recovery from waste.

3.

The JV will design and subsequently commercialize an innovative metering system for water services.

4.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

5.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10633 – SUEZ / ACEA / JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
AAM-12-369-E May 29, 2012

Exemption No. 10547 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0535

Mr. Terry Mackey Mustang Helicopter, LLC

HC 13 Box 4302 Moroni, UT 84667

Dear Mr. Mackey:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated May 10, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Mustang Helicopters, LLC (Mustang He licopters) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Mustang Helicopters to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Mustang Helicopters.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Mustang Helicopters, LLC an exemption from14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Mustang Helicopters to cover its safetysensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations

described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Mustang Helicopters are subj ect to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of the Mustang Helicopters part 135 operation, not under part 91

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M..D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure