alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RemedyTemp, Inc.

EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350 CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of RemedyTemp, Inc., a California corporation (the Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the 10-Q Report) that:

| | (1) | the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | the Information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|May 13, 2003 |  | /s/  GREG PALMER                                                                      
|------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|             |  |                                                                                       
|             |  | Greg Palmer President and Chief Executive Officer RemedyTemp, Inc.                    
|             |  |                                                                                       
|             |  |                                                                                       
|May 13, 2003 |  | /s/  MONTY A. HOUDESHELL                                                              
|             |  |                                                                                       
|             |  | Monty A. Houdeshell Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer RemedyTemp, Inc.
Exhibit 23(a)**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-84594 and333-70702 on Form S-3, and 2-82760, 33-6369, 033-63193, 333-62070, 333-113204, 333-116192 and 333-17701 on Form S-8, of Peoples EnergyCorporation, of our reports, dated December 9, 2005, relating to the consolidated financialstatements and financial statement schedules of Peoples Energy Corporation and management’s reporton the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Reporton Form 10-K/A of Peoples Energy Corporation for the year ended September 30, 2005.DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPChicago, Illinois
Exhibit 12



GAS TRANSMISSION NORTHWEST CORPORATION



RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



|                                   |  |                       |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |      
|---------------------------------- |  | --------------------- | ----- | ---- | - | ----- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | - | ----- |  | - | -----
|                                   |  | 2003                  |       | 2002 |   | 2001  |  | 2000 |       | 1999
|                                   |  | (Dollars in Millions)
|Earnings                           |  |                       |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |      
|Income from Continuing Operations  |  | $                     | 53.9  |      | $ | 79.0  |  | $    | 76.4  |      | $ | 58.4  |  | $ | 61.5 
|Adjustments:                       |  |                       |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |      
|Income taxes                       |  |                       | 34.9  |      |   | 43.7  |  |      | 34.5  |      |   | 37.4  |  |   | 37.6 
|Fixed charges (as below)           |  |                       | 39.9  |      |   | 38.9  |  |      | 38.0  |      |   | 40.9  |  |   | 42.8 
|                                   |  |                       |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |      
|Total adjusted earnings            |  | $                     | 128.7 |      | $ | 161.6 |  | $    | 148.9 |      | $ | 136.7 |  | $ | 141.9
|                                   |  |                       |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |      
|Fixed charges:                     |  |                       |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |      
|Net interest expense               |  | $                     | 39.2  |      | $ | 35.2  |  | $    | 37.0  |      | $ | 40.4  |  | $ | 41.7 
|Adjustments:                       |  |                       |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |      
|Interest component of rents        |  |                       | 0.3   |      |   | 0.4   |  |      | 0.3   |      |   | 0.1   |  |   | 0.0  
|AFUDC debt                         |  |                       | 0.4   |      |   | 3.3   |  |      | 0.7   |      |   | 0.4   |  |   | 1.1  
|                                   |  |                       |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |      
|Total fixed charges                |  | $                     | 39.9  |      | $ | 38.9  |  | $    | 38.0  |      | $ | 40.9  |  | $ | 42.8 
|                                   |  |                       |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |      
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |  |                       | 3.2   |      |   | 4.2   |  |      | 3.9   |      |   | 3.3   |  |   | 3.3  
|                                   |  |                       |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |
EXHIBIT (21)

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF OSMONICS, INC.

Percentage
Ownership
  100%   VAPONICS, INC.                     A Massachusetts Corporation
  100%   AQUA MEDIA INTERNATIONAL           A Delaware Corporation
  100%   AQUA MEDIA OF ASIA LTD.            A Hong Kong Corporation
  100%   PORETICS CORPORATION               A Delaware Corporation
  100%   OSMONICS ASIA/PACIFIC LTD.         A Hong Kong Corporation
  100%   OSMONICS EUROPA, S.A.              A Switzerland Corporation
  100%   OSMONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.        A Jamaica Corporation
  100%   OSMONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.       A Minnesota Corporation
  100%   OZONE RESEARCH & EQUIPMENT CORP.   An Arizona Corporation
  100%   GHIA, INC.                         A Nevada Corporation
  100%   AUTOTROL CORPORATION               A Wisconsin Corporation
  100%   AUTOTROL (FAR EAST) LTD.           A Japan Corporation
  100%   AUTOTROL S.A.                      A France Corporation
  100%   OSMONICS INTERNATIONAL SALES CORP. A Virgin Islands Corporation
  100%   AUTOTROL PTY. LTD.                 An Australia Corporation
  100%   MICROL SYSTEMS, LTD.               An England Corporation
  100%   PETECO CORPORATION                 A Minnesota Corporation
   50%   NIPPON AUTOTROL K.K.               A Japan Corporation
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022262EN.01001501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/15 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10772 – TSM / IREPSE)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 262/10)

1.

On 28 June 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022262EN.01001501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Triton Smaller Mid-Cap Fund II (‘TSM’, Luxembourg), controlled by Triton Group (Luxembourg), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Irepse Oy (‘Irepse’, Finland). |

Triton Group will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Irepse.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | TSM is an investment fund, owned by Triton Group, which is a European privately-held investment firm that manages a number of independent investment funds and companies, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Irepse is the ultimate parent company of the Esperi Group, a provider of elderly care, mental and substance abuse rehabilitation care, and disabled care services in Finland. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022262EN.01001501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10772 – TSM / IREPSE

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022262EN.01001501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022262EN.01001501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION

(Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned hereby certifies that, to the
best of his knowledge, (i) the foregoing Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A filed by Yadkin Valley Company (the Registrant) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                        |  |                                                                                    
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 29, 2005 |  | /s/ David S. Perry                                                                 
|                        |  | David S. Perry, President and Treasurer (principal
executive and financial officer)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that thisopinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 21, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-11208 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. SERGIO LAGUNES Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-186-14 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Sergio Lagunes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lagunes has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excusedNo. 06-11208

2 from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR
. R. 42.2.
## ELECTRONIC RECORD
COA # 14-12-00833-CR STYLE: Hiram Brown vThe State ofTexas COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed DATE: October 16. 2014 Publish: No OFFENSE: Assault COUNTY: Harris TRIAL COURT: Co Crim Ct at Law No 13 TC CASE #:1806917

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

### STYLE: Hiram Brown vThe State ofTexas CCA# 

## PROSE Petition CCADisposition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW INCCAIS: DATE: 

# fi&7?W£b JUDGE:
_ 

# DATE: 0*'l*&'/?e>/X SIGNED:, JUDGE: f^/SscAs&i^— PUBLISH: 

# \SM-IV, Ifht-tV
PC: DNP:
MOTION FOR FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: ELECTRONIC RECORD
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE 
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,917
<SECURITIES>                                    35,462
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (304)
<INVENTORY>                                        680
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,437
<PP&E>                                           2,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (588)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,327
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,923
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,404
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,327
<SALES>                                          4,284
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,284
<CGS>                                            2,590
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,590
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,493
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    82
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,307)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,307)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,307)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.61)
        

</TABLE>
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022425EN.01000601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 425/6 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10942 - PHO P/STORA ENSO MAXAU)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 425/04)

1.

On 27 October 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022425EN.01000601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | PHO P GmbH & Co. KG, a subsidiary of the Schwarz Group (‘PHO P’, Germany), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Stora Enso Maxau GmbH (‘Maxau’, Germany). |

PHO P will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Maxau.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | PHO P is part of the Schwarz Group, active in food retailing, food products, and in the collection, sorting, processing, recycling and commercialization of waste, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Maxau operates a paper manufacturing mill that produces supercalendered paper from recovered paper. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022425EN.01000601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10942 – PHO P/STORA ENSO MAXAU

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022425EN.01000601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022425EN.01000601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 301 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-622, CP2024-630.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21332 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District 1 of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-3698

___________ Matthew Joseph Sikora, Jr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska Robert Houston, Warden, Lincoln * Correctional Center; John Does, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: June 15, 1998 Filed: June 25, 1998

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Matthew J. Sikora, Jr., appeals from a final order of the United States District Court f or the District of Nebraska dismissing Sikora & s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. For 1 the reasons discussed below, we affirm. S i kora brought this action against prison personnel at the Lincoln Correctional Center, claiming they violated his constitutional rights by their use of “electro static--2-

magn etic pressure field devices” that surround his body in pressure fields of varyin g degrees and frequencies. He alleged that their sole purpose was the destruction of his “mind, confidence, and spirit,” and that the pressure fi elds caused him to suffer various physical problems. Following an initial dismissal, appeal, and remand from this court, see Sikora v. Houston , No. 96- 1368, 1996 WL 185734, at *1 (8th Cir. Apr. 19, 1996) (unpublished per curiam), defendants moved to dismiss the action for failure to stat e a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Sikora responded with a motion for su mmary judgment, arguing that defendants did not date the certificate of service in their motion to dismiss, that the motion wa s unt imely, and that defendants continued to stalk him using their “directional digita l sat ellite cyber technology.” Concluding the complaint was delusional and therefor e frivolous, the district court dismissed the complai nt with prejudice, and denied as moot the summary judgment motion. We conclude the complaint was subject to dismissal with prejudice. De fendants & failureto include a date on the certificate of service is not a bar to a properly file d motion, as neither the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure nor the district court & s loca l rules require a date. Contrary to Sikora & s c ontention, the motion to dismiss was timely file d. Finally, we conclude it appears beyond doubt that Sikora can prove no set o f facts which would entitle him to relief. See Coleman v. Watt , 40 F.3d 255, 258 (8th Cir. 1994) (standard for dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.