alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3(c)   

THE PEOPLES GAS LIGHT AND COKE COMPANY

Amendments to By-Laws Effective August 15, 2003

 

Section 3.1 of the By-laws was amended effective August 15, 2003 to reduce the number of directors comprising the Board of Directors from five to four; and

Section 4.1 of the By-laws was amended effective August 15, 2003 to read in its entirety as follows:

SECTION 4.1. Election of Officers. There shall be elected by the Board of Directors in each year the following officers: a Chairman of the Board; a President; such number of Senior Vice Presidents, such number of Vice Presidents and such number of Assistant Vice Presidents as the Board at the time may decide upon; a Secretary; such number of Assistant Secretaries as the Board at the time may decide upon; a Treasurer; and such number of Assistant Treasurers as the Board at the time may decide upon. There may also be elected a General Counsel. There may also be elected such number of Assistant General Counsel as the Board at the time may decide upon. Any two or more offices may be held by one person, except that the offices of President and Secretary may not be held by the same person. All officers shall hold their respective offices during the pleasure of the Board.

Section 4.10 of the By-laws was amended effective August 15, 2003 to read in its entirety as follows:

SECTION 4.10. Duties of Assistant Secretary, Assistant Treasurer, Assistant Controller and Assistant General Counsel. The Assistant Secretary, Assistant Treasurer and Assistant Controller shall assist the Secretary, Treasurer and Controller, respectively, in the performance of the duties assigned to each and shall for such purpose have the same powers as his or her principal. The Assistant General Counsel shall assist the General Counsel or any counsel providing primary legal services for the Company. Each assistant officer shall also have such other powers and duties as may be prescribed for him or her by the Board, or be delegated to him or her by the Chairman of the Board or by the President.
[No. 42705-9-I.

Division One.

December 11, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Lorin E. French, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 97-1-04350-2, Charles W. Mertel, J., entered May 12, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-4 and Prospectus of First Merchants Corporation, relating to the issuance
of securities in the proposed merger of Decatur Financial, Inc. into First
Merchants Corporation, of our report, dated January 22, 2000 on the consolidated
financial statements of First Merchants Corporation as of December 31, 1998 and
1999 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999. We
also consent to the reference to our firm appearing under the heading "Experts"
in the Prospectus.






Olive LLP
March 24, 2000
Indianapolis, Indiana


                                   Ex. 23(a)-1
FILED: May 15, 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 22-2224

(4:22-cv-00022-TTC-RSB)

___________________

JAMES MICHAEL ISERNIA,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DANVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER; HSCGP, LLC,

 Defendants – Appellees.

___________________

O R D E R

___________________

The court amends its opinion filed May 13, 2024, as follows:

On the cover page, the district court case number is changed to “4:22-cv00022-TTC-RSB.”

For the Court—By Direction

/s/ Nwamaka Anowi, Clerk

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2224 Doc: 41 Filed: 05/15/2024 Pg: 1 of 1
# C_2022458EN.01000301.xml

| 1.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 458/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 458/3

---

Special report 26/2022:

‘European statistics - Potential to further improve quality’

(2022/C 458/03)

The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 26/2022: ‘European statistics - Potential to further improve quality’.

The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=62590

---
Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of SCPIE Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Robert B. Tschudy  
|                         |  | Robert B. Tschudy      
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-43890,
33-44380 and 333-36415), the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-26442,
33-6141, 33-26443, 33-29144, 33-19012, 2-67317, 33-34363, 33-34362, 33-62648,
333-42231 and 333-52175) and the Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 on Form S-8 to
the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-86061) of Phelps Dodge
Corporation of our reports dated January 24, 2001, relating to the consolidated
financial statements and the financial statement schedule, which appear in this
Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 8, 2001
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 178 DB 2022 (No. 12 RST 2023)

:

TIMOTHY ZANGHI : Attorney Registration No. 319717

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM INACTIVE STATUS : (Philadelphia)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of February, 2023, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated February 3, 2023, is approved and it is ORDERED that

TIMOTHY ZANGHI, who has been on Inactive Status, has demonstrated that he has the 

moral qualifications, competency, and learning in law required for admission to practice 

in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of 

the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation 

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
#### Ex parte OSBORNE.

No. 17261.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 17, 1934.

Robert R. Mullen, Jr., of Alice, and Good-hue Weatherly, of Falfurrias, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Relator was tried and convicted in the juvenile court of Brooks county, Tex., as a delinquent child upon a complaint and information charging him with the offense of unlawfully carrying a pistol, and ordered confined in the state juvenile training school for boys at Gatesville, Tex., to an indeterminate period not to exceed beyond the time when he shall become twenty-one years of age. Relator excepted to the judgment and gave no--tice of appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. His bond was fixed at the sum of $3,000 pending his appeal. The record discloses that relator’s father endeavored-*266to mate the bond but was unable to do so because it was too high. Relator tben sued out a writ of babeas corpus before the county-judge of Brooks county, Tex., seeking a reduction of the amount of bail. Upon a hearing of said cause, the court declined to reduce the amount of said bail bond, tq which action of the court relator again excepted and gave notice of appeal to the Court -of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Section 1.1, art. 1, of the Constitution of this state provides as follows: “All prisoners shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, unless for capital offences, when the proof is evident; but this provision shall not be so construed' as to prevent bail after indictment found upon examination of the evidence, in such manner as may be prescribed by law.” Section 13 of said article of the Constitution reads as follows: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed,” etc. The offense of which the relator was convicted is but an ordinary misdemeanor and under the law he was entitled to be released upon a reasonable amount of bail. We are of the opinion that the amount of' bail required by the trial court was excessive and should have been reduced commensurate to the offense of which he was convicted.

The judgment of the trial court is here reformed and the relator is remanded to the custody of the sheriff until he shall have given a bond in the sum of $500 conditioned and approved as prescribed by law.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6044

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ADRIAN LYNDELL COOK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior 

District Judge. (4:08-cr-00029-RGD-FBS-1)

Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: May 26, 2015

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adrian Lyndell Cook, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Adrian Lyndell Cook appeals the district court’s order 

denying what it construed as motions for appointment of counsel 

and for a sentence reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Cook, No. 4:08-cr-00029-RGDFBS-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### KILDAY, Chief of Police, v. ALAMO POST NO. 2, AMERICAN LEGION et al.

No. 9394.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Nov. 22, 1933.

See, also, 65 S.W.(2d) 429.

W. C. Davis, T. D. Cobbs, Jr., and Jack Davis, all of San Antonio, for appellant.

Douglas N. Lawley, Leonard Brown, and Conger, Low & Spears, all of San Antonio, for appellees.

ELY, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by Owen W. Kilday, chief of police of the city of San Antonio, from an order of the district court granting a temporary injunction against the said Kilday, Albert Hausser, sheriff of Bexar county, and D. E. Davis, county attorney, restraining them from interfering with appellees in the lawful use and possession of the premises at 1202-1212 Navarro street, in the city of San Antonio, and commanding said parties to refrain from arresting, molesting, or in any manner interfering with, or from attempting to deter or prevent appellees, or any of them, from conducting or taking part in their business so operated at such place, in so far as the same may be based on alleged violations of section 1 of the Revised Criminal Ordinances of the City of San Antonio, as the same was amended on July 17,1905.

The record reveals that the city of San Am-tonio intervened in the original suit, which is. for damages against appellant and others, but afterwards was permitted to withdraw from, the suit, and was not a party when the injunction was granted, and was in no wise affected, by the injunction granted by the district court. No one was affected by the order except appellant Owen W. Kilday, D. E. Davis, county attorney, and Albert Hausser, sheriff of Bexar county.

It has been satisfactorily made known to-this court that the entertainment complained of has been ended and is no longer being conducted in the city of San Antonio. This information has not been assailed by appellant, although it has been filed among the-papers in this case and appellant has been charged with notice of the same.

It is the order of this court that the temporary writ of injunction granted by the district court be, and is hereby, set aside, and that the appeal is dismissed on account of the-matters involved therein being moot.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 23.2    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-31638, 333-38317 and
33-90026) on Form S-8 and registration statement (No. 33-111118) on Form S-3 of Mercer International Inc. of our
report dated January 31, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Mercer International Inc. as of December 31, 2002, and for the years ended December 31,
2002 and 2001, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 of Mercer International Inc.



March 12,
2004
Seattle, Washington

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Zones, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Firoz H. Lalji, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: May
9, 2008








/S/   FIROZ
      H LALJIFiroz
      H. LaljiChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2022315EN.01000401.xml

| 19.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/4

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 315/04)

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Limoges – Lyon (Saint-Exupéry) |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 4 March 2023 to 3 March 2027 |
| Deadline for the submission of applications and tenders | 27 October 2022, 12.00 Paris time |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Syndicat Mixte de l’Aéroport de Limoges-Bellegarde |
| 81 avenue de l’aéroport |
| 87 100 Limoges |
| FRANCE |

Member State

France

Route concerned

Limoges – Lyon (Saint-Exupéry)

Period of validity of the contract

From 4 March 2023 to 3 March 2027

Deadline for the submission of applications and tenders

27 October 2022, 12.00 Paris time

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Syndicat Mixte de l’Aéroport de Limoges-Bellegarde

81 avenue de l’aéroport

87 100 Limoges

FRANCE

Tel. +33 555433025

Email: direction@smalb-aeroport.fr

Or on the platform containing SMALB’s buyer profile: https://www.e-marchespublics.com

---
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT




 Exhibit 10.20 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 AGREEMENT 
  
 This First Amendment to Agreement (this “Amendment”), dated as of September 23, 2004 (the “Effective Date”), amends that certain
Agreement, dated as of August 18, 2003 (the “Original Agreement”), between Monitronics International, Inc. (the “Company”) and James R. Hull, individually (“Hull”). 
  
 A. The parties entered into the Original Agreement pursuant to which, among
other things, the Company granted Hull the Put Option exercisable at the Put Price. 
  
 B. The parties desire to amend the Original Agreement to amend the calculation of the Put Price as provided herein. 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the agreements herein contained, and intending to be bound hereby, the parties hereby agree as
follows: 
  

	1.	Amendment of Original Agreement. 

  
 1.01 Section 3(a)(i)(y) of the Original Agreement shall be amended by deleting the number “5.6” and replacing it with “6.02.”

  

	2.	Miscellaneous. 

  
 2.01 Effect. Except as amended hereby, the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
  
 2.02 Defined Terms. All capitalized terms used but not specifically
defined herein shall have the same meanings given such terms in the Original Agreement unless the context clearly indicates or dictates a contrary meaning. 
  
 2.03 Governing Law. This Amendment and all rights of the parties hereunder shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. 
  
 2.04 Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of
counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument, and each of the parties hereto may execute this Amendment by signing any of such counterparts. 
  
 [REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 
  








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands as of the date first above written.

  
 MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

 
 By:/s/ James R. Hull 
 Name: James R. Hull 
 Title: President and Chief Executive Officer 
  
 /s/ James R. Hull 
 James R. Hull
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-38,256-12

EX P ARTE MICHAEL HOS EA, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 9415203-J IN THE 232ND DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam .

O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Tex as C o d e o f Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y o u n g , 4 1 8 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenc ed to forty

year s’ imprisonment. In his prese nt application, Applicant contends that he was denied due proce ss du ri n g his direc t appea l. This application, howeve r, prese nts a more serious question. This Court’s rec ords ref lect that Applicant has filed many p ri o r h ab ea s appli cations perta ining to this conviction. It is obvious from the rec ord that Applicant co n t i n u es t o raise issues that have been prese nted and2

reje cted in pr evious applications or that should ha ve been prese nted in pr evious applications. The writ of habeas cor

pus is not to be lightly or easily abused. Sanders v. U.S. , 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr , 511 S.W .2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Be cause of his repe titive claims, we hold that Applicant’s claims are barr ed from revie w under Article 11.07, § 4, and are waived and abandone d by his abuse of the writ. This application is dismiss ed. There fore , we instruct the Clerk of the C ourt of C rimi n al Ap p ea ls not to acc ept or file the instant application for a writ of habea s corpus, or any future application perta ining to this conviction unless Applicant is able to sh ow in such an application that any claims prese nted have not been raised previously and that they could not have been prese nted in a previous application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Bilton , 602 S.W .2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980). Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Filed: August 21, 2019 Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001029386
<NAME>  Furst & Furst Inc
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                       538
<INVENTORY>                                     42,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,205
<PP&E>                                          44,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,699
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,683
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>