# Službeni list L 219/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0847 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | L 219 |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Zakonodavstvo | Svezak 58.20. kolovoza 2015. |

ISSN 1977-0847

Službeni list

Europske unije

L 219

Hrvatsko izdanje

Zakonodavstvo

Svezak 58.20. kolovoza 2015.

---

| Sadržaj | | II.   Nezakonodavni akti | Stranica |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | UREDBE |
| | * | Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1407 оd 19. kolovoza 2015. o izmjeni Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 170/2013 o utvrđivanju prijelaznih mjera u sektoru šećera zbog pristupanja Hrvatske | 1 |
| | * | Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1408 оd 19. kolovoza 2015. o odobrenju DL-metionil-DL-metionina kao dodatka hrani za ribe i rakove (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| | | Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1409 оd 19. kolovoza 2015. o utvrđivanju paušalnih uvoznih vrijednosti za određivanje ulazne cijene određenog voća i povrća | 6 |
| | | ODLUKE |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2015/1410 of 19 August 2015 giving notice to Greece to take measures for the deficit reduction judged necessary to remedy the situation of excessive deficit | 8 |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1411 of 19 August 2015 approving the macroeconomic adjustment programme of Greece | 12 |
| | | AKTI KOJE DONOSE TIJELA STVORENA MEĐUNARODNIM SPORAZUMIMA |
| | * | Odluka br. 1 Odbora za trgovinu robom između EU-a i Koreje od 28. svibnja 2015. o donošenju pravila upravljanja tarifnim kvotama i njihovoj provedbi [2015/1412] | 17 |

Sadržaj

II.   Nezakonodavni akti

Stranica

UREDBE

*

Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1407 оd 19. kolovoza 2015. o izmjeni Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 170/2013 o utvrđivanju prijelaznih mjera u sektoru šećera zbog pristupanja Hrvatske

1

*

Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1408 оd 19. kolovoza 2015. o odobrenju DL-metionil-DL-metionina kao dodatka hrani za ribe i rakove (
  1
  )

1

3

Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1409 оd 19. kolovoza 2015. o utvrđivanju paušalnih uvoznih vrijednosti za određivanje ulazne cijene određenog voća i povrća

6

ODLUKE

*

Council Decision (EU) 2015/1410 of 19 August 2015 giving notice to Greece to take measures for the deficit reduction judged necessary to remedy the situation of excessive deficit

8

*

Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1411 of 19 August 2015 approving the macroeconomic adjustment programme of Greece

12

AKTI KOJE DONOSE TIJELA STVORENA MEĐUNARODNIM SPORAZUMIMA

*

Odluka br. 1 Odbora za trgovinu robom između EU-a i Koreje od 28. svibnja 2015. o donošenju pravila upravljanja tarifnim kvotama i njihovoj provedbi [2015/1412]

17

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Tekst značajan za EGP |

---

(1)   Tekst značajan za EGP

1

| HR | Akti čiji su naslovi tiskani običnim slovima su oni koji se odnose na svakodnevno upravljanje poljoprivrednim pitanjima, a općenito vrijede ograničeno razdoblje.
  Naslovi svih drugih akata tiskani su masnim slovima, a prethodi im zvjezdica. |
| --- | --- |

HR

Akti čiji su naslovi tiskani običnim slovima su oni koji se odnose na svakodnevno upravljanje poljoprivrednim pitanjima, a općenito vrijede ograničeno razdoblje.

Naslovi svih drugih akata tiskani su masnim slovima, a prethodi im zvjezdica.

---

II. Nezakonodavni akti

UREDBE

| 20.8.2015 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | L 219/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2015

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

L 219/1

---

PROVEDBENA UREDBA KOMISIJE (EU) 2015/1407

оd 19. kolovoza 2015.

o izmjeni Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 170/2013 o utvrđivanju prijelaznih mjera u sektoru šećera zbog pristupanja Hrvatske

EUROPSKA KOMISIJA,

uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o pristupanju Hrvatske,

uzimajući u obzir Akt o pristupanju Hrvatske (1), a posebno njegove članke 41. i 16., u vezi s njegovim Prilogom IV. odjeljkom 3. točkom (a) podtočkom 4.,

budući da:

| (1) | Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) br. 170/2013 (2) utvrđuju se prijelazne mjere u sektoru šećera zbog pristupanja Hrvatske Uniji. Poglavlje II. odjeljak 2. te Uredbe odnosi se na određivanje i uklanjanje viška količina šećera prisutnog u Hrvatskoj na datum pristupanja. U njemu se posebice utvrđuju rokovi za određivanje viška količina šećera, za njegovo uklanjanje i za dokaze o uklanjanju koje moraju dostaviti utvrđeni gospodarski subjekti u Hrvatskoj. Osim toga, utvrđuju se referentna razdoblja koja će se uzeti u obzir pri izračunavanju troškova za Hrvatsku ako se višak količina ne ukloni. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) br. 170/2013 (2) utvrđuju se prijelazne mjere u sektoru šećera zbog pristupanja Hrvatske Uniji. Poglavlje II. odjeljak 2. te Uredbe odnosi se na određivanje i uklanjanje viška količina šećera prisutnog u Hrvatskoj na datum pristupanja. U njemu se posebice utvrđuju rokovi za određivanje viška količina šećera, za njegovo uklanjanje i za dokaze o uklanjanju koje moraju dostaviti utvrđeni gospodarski subjekti u Hrvatskoj. Osim toga, utvrđuju se referentna razdoblja koja će se uzeti u obzir pri izračunavanju troškova za Hrvatsku ako se višak količina ne ukloni.

| (2) | Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) br. 1345/2014 (3) utvrđen je višak količina šećera skladištenog u Hrvatskoj prije njezina pristupanja koji se mora ukloniti s tržišta Unije na trošak Hrvatske u skladu s rokovima iz Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 170/2013 kako je izmijenjena Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) br. 968/2014. (4). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) br. 1345/2014 (3) utvrđen je višak količina šećera skladištenog u Hrvatskoj prije njezina pristupanja koji se mora ukloniti s tržišta Unije na trošak Hrvatske u skladu s rokovima iz Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 170/2013 kako je izmijenjena Provedbenom uredbom Komisije (EU) br. 968/2014. (4).

| (3) | U dopisu od 19. svibnja 2015. Hrvatska je obavijestila Komisiju da, iako ne dovodi u pitanje obvezu da se do 30. rujna 2015. osigura uklanjanje viška količina šećera s tržišta kako je utvrdila Komisija, došlo je do nepredviđenih postupovnih poteškoća u provedbi obveze prisiljavanja predmetnih subjekata na uklanjanje viška količina te da je potrebno dodatno vrijeme za rješavanje tih problema. Stoga je primjereno produljiti rokove predviđene Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 170/2013 za šest mjeseci. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

U dopisu od 19. svibnja 2015. Hrvatska je obavijestila Komisiju da, iako ne dovodi u pitanje obvezu da se do 30. rujna 2015. osigura uklanjanje viška količina šećera s tržišta kako je utvrdila Komisija, došlo je do nepredviđenih postupovnih poteškoća u provedbi obveze prisiljavanja predmetnih subjekata na uklanjanje viška količina te da je potrebno dodatno vrijeme za rješavanje tih problema. Stoga je primjereno produljiti rokove predviđene Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 170/2013 za šest mjeseci.

| (4) | Provedbenu uredbu (EU) br. 170/2013 trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Provedbenu uredbu (EU) br. 170/2013 trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti.

| (5) | Mjere predviđene u ovoj Uredbi u skladu su s mišljenjem Odbora za zajedničku organizaciju poljoprivrednih tržišta, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Mjere predviđene u ovoj Uredbi u skladu su s mišljenjem Odbora za zajedničku organizaciju poljoprivrednih tržišta,

DONIJELA JE OVU UREDBU:

Članak 1.

Provedbena uredba (EU) br. 170/2013 mijenja se kako slijedi:

| 1. | U članku 9. stavku 1., riječi „30. rujna 2015.” zamjenjuju se riječima „31. ožujka 2016.” |
| --- | --- |

1.

U članku 9. stavku 1., riječi „30. rujna 2015.” zamjenjuju se riječima „31. ožujka 2016.”

| 2. | Članak 10. mijenja se kako slijedi:






  (a) | riječi „30. rujna 2015.” zamjenjuju se riječima „31. ožujka 2016.”; |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

Članak 10. mijenja se kako slijedi:

(a)

riječi „30. rujna 2015.” zamjenjuju se riječima „31. ožujka 2016.”;

| (b) | riječi „31. svibnja 2016.” zamjenjuju se riječima „30. studenoga 2016.” |
| --- | --- |

(b)

riječi „31. svibnja 2016.” zamjenjuju se riječima „30. studenoga 2016.”

| 3. | Članak 11. mijenja se kako slijedi:






  (a) | u stavku 1., riječi „31. prosinca 2015.” zamjenjuju se riječima „30. lipnja 2016.”; |
| --- | --- | --- |

3.

Članak 11. mijenja se kako slijedi:

(a)

u stavku 1., riječi „31. prosinca 2015.” zamjenjuju se riječima „30. lipnja 2016.”;

| (b) | u stavku 2. četvrtom podstavku, riječi „30. rujna 2015.” zamjenjuju se riječima „31. ožujka 2016.” |
| --- | --- |

(b)

u stavku 2. četvrtom podstavku, riječi „30. rujna 2015.” zamjenjuju se riječima „31. ožujka 2016.”

| 4. | Članak 12. mijenja se kako slijedi:






  (a) | u stavku 1., riječi „31. siječnja 2016.” zamjenjuju se riječima „31. srpnja 2016.”; |
| --- | --- | --- |

4.

Članak 12. mijenja se kako slijedi:

(a)

u stavku 1., riječi „31. siječnja 2016.” zamjenjuju se riječima „31. srpnja 2016.”;

| (b) | stavak 2. mijenja se kako slijedi:






  i. | u prvom podstavku, riječi „30. rujna 2015.” zamjenjuju se riječima „31. ožujka 2016.”; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

stavak 2. mijenja se kako slijedi:

i.

u prvom podstavku, riječi „30. rujna 2015.” zamjenjuju se riječima „31. ožujka 2016.”;

| ii. | u drugom podstavku, riječi „31. svibnja 2016.” zamjenjuju se riječima „30. studenoga 2016.”; |
| --- | --- |

ii.

u drugom podstavku, riječi „31. svibnja 2016.” zamjenjuju se riječima „30. studenoga 2016.”;

| iii. | u trećem podstavku, riječi „31. ožujka 2016.” zamjenjuju se riječima „30. rujna 2016.” |
| --- | --- |

iii.

u trećem podstavku, riječi „31. ožujka 2016.” zamjenjuju se riječima „30. rujna 2016.”

Članak 2.

Ova Uredba stupa na snagu trećeg dana od dana objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.

Ova je Uredba u cijelosti obvezujuća i izravno se primjenjuje u svim državama članicama.

Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 19. kolovoza 2015.

Za Komisiju

Predsjednik

Jean-Claude JUNCKER

---

(1)  SL L 112, 24.4.2012., str. 10.

1

(2)  Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) br. 170/2013 оd 25. veljače 2013. o utvrđivanju prijelaznih mjera u sektoru šećera zbog pristupanja Hrvatske (SL L 55, 27.2.2013., str. 1.).

2

(3)  Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) br. 1345/2014 оd 17. prosinca 2014. o određivanju viška količina šećera, izoglukoze i fruktoze u Hrvatskoj (SL L 363, 18.12.2014., str. 80.).

3

(4)  Provedbena uredba Komisije (EU) br. 968/2014 оd 12. rujna 2014. o izmjeni Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 170/2013 o utvrđivanju prijelaznih mjera u sektoru šećera zbog pristupanja Hrvatske (SL L 272, 13.9.2014., str. 6.).

4

---

| 20.8.2015 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | L 219/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2015

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

L 219/3

---

PROVEDBENA UREDBA KOMISIJE (EU) 2015/1408

оd 19. kolovoza 2015.

o odobrenju DL-metionil-DL-metionina kao dodatka hrani za ribe i rakove

(Tekst značajan za EGP)

EUROPSKA KOMISIJA,

uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije,

uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EZ) br. 1831/2003 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 22. rujna 2003. o dodacima hrani za životinje (1), a posebno njezin članak 9. stavak 2.,

budući da:

| (1) | Uredbom (EZ) br. 1831/2003 predviđa se odobravanje dodataka hrani za životinje te osnove i postupci za izdavanje tog odobrenja. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Uredbom (EZ) br. 1831/2003 predviđa se odobravanje dodataka hrani za životinje te osnove i postupci za izdavanje tog odobrenja.

| (2) | U skladu s člankom 7. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1831/2003 podnesen je zahtjev za odobrenje DL-metionil-DL-metionina kao dodatka hrani za životinje. Uz navedeni zahtjev priloženi su podaci i dokumenti propisani člankom 7. stavkom 3. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1831/2003. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

U skladu s člankom 7. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1831/2003 podnesen je zahtjev za odobrenje DL-metionil-DL-metionina kao dodatka hrani za životinje. Uz navedeni zahtjev priloženi su podaci i dokumenti propisani člankom 7. stavkom 3. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1831/2003.

| (3) | Zahtjev se odnosi na odobrenje DL-metionil-DL-metionina kao dodatka hrani za sve akvatične životinjske vrste i njegovo razvrstavanje u kategoriju dodataka „nutritivni dodaci”. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Zahtjev se odnosi na odobrenje DL-metionil-DL-metionina kao dodatka hrani za sve akvatične životinjske vrste i njegovo razvrstavanje u kategoriju dodataka „nutritivni dodaci”.

| (4) | Europska agencija za sigurnost hrane (dalje u tekstu „Agencija”) u svojem je mišljenju od 27. siječnja 2015. (2) zaključila da u predloženim uvjetima uporabe DL-metionil-DL-metionin nema negativan utjecaj na zdravlje životinja, zdravlje ljudi ili na okoliš te da se može smatrati djelotvornim izvorom aminokiseline L-metionin za ribe i rakove. Agencija smatra da ne postoji potreba za posebnim zahtjevima za monitoring nakon stavljanja na tržište. Isto tako, potvrdila je izvješće o metodi analize dodatka hrani za životinje koje je dostavio referentni laboratorij osnovan Uredbom (EZ) br. 1831/2003. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Europska agencija za sigurnost hrane (dalje u tekstu „Agencija”) u svojem je mišljenju od 27. siječnja 2015. (2) zaključila da u predloženim uvjetima uporabe DL-metionil-DL-metionin nema negativan utjecaj na zdravlje životinja, zdravlje ljudi ili na okoliš te da se može smatrati djelotvornim izvorom aminokiseline L-metionin za ribe i rakove. Agencija smatra da ne postoji potreba za posebnim zahtjevima za monitoring nakon stavljanja na tržište. Isto tako, potvrdila je izvješće o metodi analize dodatka hrani za životinje koje je dostavio referentni laboratorij osnovan Uredbom (EZ) br. 1831/2003.

| (5) | Procjena DL-metionil-DL-metionina pokazala je da su ispunjeni uvjeti za odobravanje predviđeni člankom 5. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1831/2003. U skladu s tim trebalo bi odobriti uporabu te tvari kako je navedeno u Prilogu ovoj Uredbi. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Procjena DL-metionil-DL-metionina pokazala je da su ispunjeni uvjeti za odobravanje predviđeni člankom 5. Uredbe (EZ) br. 1831/2003. U skladu s tim trebalo bi odobriti uporabu te tvari kako je navedeno u Prilogu ovoj Uredbi.

| (6) | Mjere predviđene ovom Uredbom u skladu su s mišljenjem Stalnog odbora za bilje, životinje, hranu i hranu za životinje, |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Mjere predviđene ovom Uredbom u skladu su s mišljenjem Stalnog odbora za bilje, životinje, hranu i hranu za životinje,

DONIJELA JE OVU UREDBU:

Članak 1.

Tvar navedena u Prilogu, koja pripada kategoriji dodataka „nutritivni dodaci” i funkcionalnoj skupini „aminokiseline, njihove soli i analogne tvari”, odobrava se kao dodatak hrani za životinje u skladu s uvjetima utvrđenima u tom Prilogu.

Članak 2.

Ova Uredba stupa na snagu dvadesetog dana od dana objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.

Ova je Uredba u cijelosti obvezujuća i izravno se primjenjuje u svim državama članicama.

Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 19. kolovoza 2015.

Za Komisiju

Predsjednik

Jean-Claude JUNCKER

---

(1)  SL L 268, 18.10.2003., str. 29.

1

(2)  EFSA Journal 2015.; 13(2):4012.

2

EFSA Journal

---

PRILOG

| Identifikacijski broj dodatka | Naziv nositelja odobrenja | Dodatak | Sastav, kemijska formula, opis, analitička metoda | Vrsta ili kategorija životinje | Najviša dob | Najmanja dopuštena količina | Najveća dopuštena količina | Ostale odredbe | Datum isteka valjanosti odobrenja |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| mg/kg potpune krmne smjese s udjelom vlage od 12 % |
| Kategorija nutritivnih dodataka. Funkcionalna skupina: aminokiseline, njihove soli i analogne tvari |
| 3c306 | — | DL-metionil-DL-metionin | Sastav dodatka

  Kristalni prah dobiven kemijskom sintezom najmanje 93 % DL-metionil-DL-metionina, najviše 3 % DL-metionina i najviše 3 % natrijeva sulfata (na osnovi suhe tvari)

  Karakteristike aktivne tvari

  DL-metionil-DL-metionin (2-[(2-amino-4-metilsulfanilbutanoil)amino]-4-metilsulfanilbutanska kiselina)
  Kemijska formula: C10H20N2O3S2

  CAS broj: 52715-93-2

  Analitička metoda
   (1)

  Za kvantifikaciju DL-metionil-DL-metionina u dodatku hrani za životinje: tekućinska kromatografija visoke učinkovitosti s reverznom fazom uz fotometrijsko otkrivanje pri 205 nm (RP-HPLC-UV).
  Za kvantifikaciju DL-metionil-DL-metionina u premiksima, krmnoj smjesi i krmivima: kromatografija izmjene iona zajedno s postkolonskom derivatizacijom i fotometrijskim otkrivanjem pri 570 nm (IEC-UV). | Ribe i rakovi | — | | | Udio vlage označuje se na deklaraciji. | 9. rujna 2025. |

Identifikacijski broj dodatka

Naziv nositelja odobrenja

Dodatak

Sastav, kemijska formula, opis, analitička metoda

Vrsta ili kategorija životinje

Najviša dob

Najmanja dopuštena količina

Najveća dopuštena količina

Ostale odredbe

Datum isteka valjanosti odobrenja

mg/kg potpune krmne smjese s udjelom vlage od 12 %

Kategorija nutritivnih dodataka. Funkcionalna skupina: aminokiseline, njihove soli i analogne tvari

3c306

—

DL-metionil-DL-metionin

Sastav dodatka

Kristalni prah dobiven kemijskom sintezom najmanje 93 % DL-metionil-DL-metionina, najviše 3 % DL-metionina i najviše 3 % natrijeva sulfata (na osnovi suhe tvari)

Karakteristike aktivne tvari

DL-metionil-DL-metionin (2-[(2-amino-4-metilsulfanilbutanoil)amino]-4-metilsulfanilbutanska kiselina)

Kemijska formula: C10H20N2O3S2

CAS broj: 52715-93-2

Analitička metoda
   (1)

Za kvantifikaciju DL-metionil-DL-metionina u dodatku hrani za životinje: tekućinska kromatografija visoke učinkovitosti s reverznom fazom uz fotometrijsko otkrivanje pri 205 nm (RP-HPLC-UV).

Za kvantifikaciju DL-metionil-DL-metionina u premiksima, krmnoj smjesi i krmivima: kromatografija izmjene iona zajedno s postkolonskom derivatizacijom i fotometrijskim otkrivanjem pri 570 nm (IEC-UV).

Ribe i rakovi

—

Udio vlage označuje se na deklaraciji.

9. rujna 2025.

---

(1)  Podaci o analitičkim metodama dostupni su na sljedećoj adresi referentnog laboratorija: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/eurl/feed-additives/evaluation-reports

---

| 20.8.2015 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | L 219/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2015

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

L 219/6

---

PROVEDBENA UREDBA KOMISIJE (EU) 2015/1409

оd 19. kolovoza 2015.

o utvrđivanju paušalnih uvoznih vrijednosti za određivanje ulazne cijene određenog voća i povrća

EUROPSKA KOMISIJA,

uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije,

uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) br. 1308/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 17. prosinca 2013. o uspostavljanju zajedničke organizacije tržišta poljoprivrednih proizvoda i stavljanju izvan snage uredbi Vijeća (EEZ) br. 922/72, (EEZ) br. 234/79, (EZ) br. 1037/2001 i (EZ) br. 1234/2007 (1),

uzimajući u obzir Provedbenu uredbu Komisije (EU) br. 543/2011 od 7. lipnja 2011. o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila za primjenu Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 1234/2007 za sektore voća i povrća te prerađevina voća i povrća (2), a posebno njezin članak 136. stavak 1.,

budući da:

| (1) | Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 543/2011, prema ishodu Urugvajske runde multilateralnih pregovora o trgovini, utvrđuju se kriteriji kojima Komisija određuje paušalne vrijednosti za uvoz iz trećih zemalja, za proizvode i razdoblja određena u njezinu Prilogu XVI. dijelu A. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Provedbenom uredbom (EU) br. 543/2011, prema ishodu Urugvajske runde multilateralnih pregovora o trgovini, utvrđuju se kriteriji kojima Komisija određuje paušalne vrijednosti za uvoz iz trećih zemalja, za proizvode i razdoblja određena u njezinu Prilogu XVI. dijelu A.

| (2) | Paušalna uvozna vrijednost izračunava se za svaki radni dan, u skladu s člankom 136. stavkom 1. Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 543/2011, uzimajući u obzir promjenjive dnevne podatke. Stoga ova Uredba treba stupiti na snagu na dan objave u Službenom listu Europske unije, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Paušalna uvozna vrijednost izračunava se za svaki radni dan, u skladu s člankom 136. stavkom 1. Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 543/2011, uzimajući u obzir promjenjive dnevne podatke. Stoga ova Uredba treba stupiti na snagu na dan objave u Službenom listu Europske unije,

DONIJELA JE OVU UREDBU:

Članak 1.

Paušalne uvozne vrijednosti iz članka 136. Provedbene uredbe (EU) br. 543/2011 određene su u Prilogu ovoj Uredbi.

Članak 2.

Ova Uredba stupa na snagu na dan objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.

Ova je Uredba u cijelosti obvezujuća i izravno se primjenjuje u svim državama članicama.

Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 19. kolovoza 2015.

Za Komisiju,

u ime predsjednika,

Jerzy PLEWA

Glavni direktor za poljoprivredu i ruralni razvoj

---

(1)  SL L 347, 20.12.2013., str. 671.

1

(2)  SL L 157, 15.6.2011., str. 1.

2

---

PRILOG

Paušalne uvozne vrijednosti za određivanje ulazne cijene određenog voća i povrća

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| Oznaka KN | Oznaka treće zemlje (1) | Standardna uvozna vrijednost |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 164,5 |
| MK | 51,2 |
| ZZ | 107,9 |
| 0709 93 10 | TR | 131,0 |
| ZZ | 131,0 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 143,0 |
| BO | 154,5 |
| CL | 163,3 |
| UY | 153,9 |
| ZA | 153,7 |
| ZZ | 153,7 |
| 0806 10 10 | EG | 253,2 |
| IL | 390,7 |
| TR | 166,5 |
| US | 339,9 |
| ZZ | 283,1 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 122,9 |
| BR | 92,7 |
| CL | 124,5 |
| NZ | 146,7 |
| US | 109,0 |
| UY | 141,9 |
| ZA | 120,2 |
| ZZ | 122,6 |
| 0808 30 90 | AR | 136,4 |
| CL | 152,7 |
| CN | 85,3 |
| NZ | 108,4 |
| TR | 136,3 |
| ZA | 111,8 |
| ZZ | 121,8 |
| 0809 30 10, 0809 30 90 | MK | 69,5 |
| TR | 131,7 |
| ZZ | 100,6 |
| 0809 40 05 | BA | 44,3 |
| IL | 99,6 |
| MK | 36,8 |
| XS | 57,7 |
| ZZ | 59,6 |

(EUR/100 kg)

Oznaka KN

Oznaka treće zemlje (1)

Standardna uvozna vrijednost

0702 00 00

MA

164,5

MK

51,2

ZZ

107,9

0709 93 10

TR

131,0

ZZ

131,0

0805 50 10

AR

143,0

BO

154,5

CL

163,3

UY

153,9

ZA

153,7

ZZ

153,7

0806 10 10

EG

253,2

IL

390,7

TR

166,5

US

339,9

ZZ

283,1

0808 10 80

AR

122,9

BR

92,7

CL

124,5

NZ

146,7

US

109,0

UY

141,9

ZA

120,2

ZZ

122,6

0808 30 90

AR

136,4

CL

152,7

CN

85,3

NZ

108,4

TR

136,3

ZA

111,8

ZZ

121,8

0809 30 10, 0809 30 90

MK

69,5

TR

131,7

ZZ

100,6

0809 40 05

BA

44,3

IL

99,6

MK

36,8

XS

57,7

ZZ

59,6

---

(1)  Nomenklatura država utvrđena Uredbom Komisije (EU) br. 1106/2012 od 27. studenoga 2012. o provedbi Uredbe (EZ) br. 471/2009 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o statistici Zajednice u vezi s vanjskom trgovinom sa zemljama nečlanicama, u pogledu ažuriranja nomenklature država i područja (SL L 328, 28.11.2012., str. 7.). Oznakom „ZZ” označava se „drugo podrijetlo”.

---

ODLUKE

| 20.8.2015 | EN | Službeni list Europske unije | L 219/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2015

EN

Službeni list Europske unije

L 219/8

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2015/1410

of 19 August 2015

giving notice to Greece to take measures for the deficit reduction judged necessary to remedy the situation of excessive deficit

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 126(9) thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 126 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’) establishes that Member States are to avoid excessive government deficits and sets out the excessive deficit procedure to that effect. The Stability and Growth Pact, which in its corrective arm implements the excessive deficit procedure, provides the framework supporting government policies for a prompt return to sound budgetary positions taking account of the economic situation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 126 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’) establishes that Member States are to avoid excessive government deficits and sets out the excessive deficit procedure to that effect. The Stability and Growth Pact, which in its corrective arm implements the excessive deficit procedure, provides the framework supporting government policies for a prompt return to sound budgetary positions taking account of the economic situation.

| (2) | On 27 April 2009, the Council decided, in accordance with Article 104(6) of the Treaty establishing the European Community that an excessive deficit existed in Greece. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 27 April 2009, the Council decided, in accordance with Article 104(6) of the Treaty establishing the European Community that an excessive deficit existed in Greece.

| (3) | On 10 May 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/320/EU (1) addressed to Greece under Article 126(9) and Article 136 TFEU with a view to reinforcing and deepening the fiscal surveillance and giving notice to take measures for the deficit reduction judged necessary to remedy the situation of excessive deficit at the latest by the deadline of 2014. The Council established 2014 as the deadline for correcting the situation of excessive deficit, and annual targets for the government deficit. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 10 May 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/320/EU (1) addressed to Greece under Article 126(9) and Article 136 TFEU with a view to reinforcing and deepening the fiscal surveillance and giving notice to take measures for the deficit reduction judged necessary to remedy the situation of excessive deficit at the latest by the deadline of 2014. The Council established 2014 as the deadline for correcting the situation of excessive deficit, and annual targets for the government deficit.

| (4) | Council Decision No 2010/320/EU was substantially amended several times. Since further amendments were to be made, it was recast, on 12 July 2011, by Council Decision 2011/734/EU of 12 July 2011 addressed to Greece with a view to reinforcing and deepening fiscal surveillance and giving notice to Greece to take measures for the deficit reduction judged necessary to remedy the situation of excessive deficit (2) in the interest of clarity. Subsequently, that Decision was significantly amended several times between 8 July 2011 and December 2012 (3). |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Council Decision No 2010/320/EU was substantially amended several times. Since further amendments were to be made, it was recast, on 12 July 2011, by Council Decision 2011/734/EU of 12 July 2011 addressed to Greece with a view to reinforcing and deepening fiscal surveillance and giving notice to Greece to take measures for the deficit reduction judged necessary to remedy the situation of excessive deficit (2) in the interest of clarity. Subsequently, that Decision was significantly amended several times between 8 July 2011 and December 2012 (3).

| (5) | The very severe deterioration of the financial situation of Greece has led euro area Member States to decide to provide it stability support, with a view to safeguarding the financial stability of the euro area as a whole, in conjunction with multilateral assistance provided by the International Monetary Fund. From May 2010 to June 2015, support provided by the euro area Member States took the form of both a bilateral Greek Loan Facility and a loan from the European Financial Stability Facility (‘EFSF’). The lenders' support was accompanied by extensive policy conditionality, including the respect by Greece of Council Decision 2011/734/EU and subsequent amendments thereto. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The very severe deterioration of the financial situation of Greece has led euro area Member States to decide to provide it stability support, with a view to safeguarding the financial stability of the euro area as a whole, in conjunction with multilateral assistance provided by the International Monetary Fund. From May 2010 to June 2015, support provided by the euro area Member States took the form of both a bilateral Greek Loan Facility and a loan from the European Financial Stability Facility (‘EFSF’). The lenders' support was accompanied by extensive policy conditionality, including the respect by Greece of Council Decision 2011/734/EU and subsequent amendments thereto.

| (6) | On 8 July 2015, Greece requested financial assistance from the European Stability Mechanism (‘ESM’) in the form of a three-year loan, and on 12 July 2015 an agreement in principle was reached on the provision of a loan of the amount of up to EUR 86 000 million to Greece. On 17 July, the ESM Board of Governors entrusted the European Commission, in liaison with the European Central Bank, and with the International Monetary Fund, with the task of negotiating a Memorandum of Understanding (‘MoU’) detailing the policy conditionality for a financial assistance facility covering the period 2015-2018 in accordance with Article 13(3) of the ESM Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

On 8 July 2015, Greece requested financial assistance from the European Stability Mechanism (‘ESM’) in the form of a three-year loan, and on 12 July 2015 an agreement in principle was reached on the provision of a loan of the amount of up to EUR 86 000 million to Greece. On 17 July, the ESM Board of Governors entrusted the European Commission, in liaison with the European Central Bank, and with the International Monetary Fund, with the task of negotiating a Memorandum of Understanding (‘MoU’) detailing the policy conditionality for a financial assistance facility covering the period 2015-2018 in accordance with Article 13(3) of the ESM Treaty.

| (7) | In accordance with Regulation (EU) No 472/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on the strengthening of economic and budgetary surveillance of Member States in the euro area experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability (4), and in particular Article 7 thereof, a Member State requesting financial assistance from the ESM must prepare a macroeconomic adjustment programme (‘the Programme’) for approval by the Council. Such a programme should ensure the adoption of a set of reforms needed to improve the sustainability of public finances and the regulatory environment. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

In accordance with Regulation (EU) No 472/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on the strengthening of economic and budgetary surveillance of Member States in the euro area experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability (4), and in particular Article 7 thereof, a Member State requesting financial assistance from the ESM must prepare a macroeconomic adjustment programme (‘the Programme’) for approval by the Council. Such a programme should ensure the adoption of a set of reforms needed to improve the sustainability of public finances and the regulatory environment.

| (8) | The Programme prepared by Greece was approved by Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1411 (5). |
| --- | --- |

(8)

The Programme prepared by Greece was approved by Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1411 (5).

| (9) | Article 10(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 472/2013 also establishes that, in case a Member State subject to a macroeconomic adjustment programme under Article 7 of that Regulation is also subject to a decision under 126(9) TFEU for the correction of its excessive deficit, the annual budgetary targets in its macroeconomic adjustment programme shall be integrated into the decision to give notice under Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 of 7 July 1997 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure (6); in addition, the measures conducive to those targets in the macroeconomic adjustment programme shall also be integrated into the decision to give notice in accordance with Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97. Article 10(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 472/2013 further establishes that the Member State shall be exempt from submitting reports under Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97. Finally, Article 10(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 472/2013 establishes that the monitoring shall be undertaken as provided for by Article 7(4) of that Regulation and the Member State shall be exempt from monitoring under Article 10(1) and Article 10a of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 and from monitoring underlying any decision under Article 6(2) of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

Article 10(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 472/2013 also establishes that, in case a Member State subject to a macroeconomic adjustment programme under Article 7 of that Regulation is also subject to a decision under 126(9) TFEU for the correction of its excessive deficit, the annual budgetary targets in its macroeconomic adjustment programme shall be integrated into the decision to give notice under Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 of 7 July 1997 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure (6); in addition, the measures conducive to those targets in the macroeconomic adjustment programme shall also be integrated into the decision to give notice in accordance with Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97. Article 10(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 472/2013 further establishes that the Member State shall be exempt from submitting reports under Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97. Finally, Article 10(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 472/2013 establishes that the monitoring shall be undertaken as provided for by Article 7(4) of that Regulation and the Member State shall be exempt from monitoring under Article 10(1) and Article 10a of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 and from monitoring underlying any decision under Article 6(2) of that Regulation.

| (10) | Economic activity in Greece is currently projected to be much weaker than was expected when the latest amendment to Council Decision 2011/734/EU was adopted in December 2012. Both real and nominal GDP are expected to be at much lower levels in 2015 and 2016 than was expected in the 2015 Spring Forecast of the Commission, due to policy uncertainty, lack of implementation of reforms, a shortfall in government revenues, bank holidays, and the imposition of capital controls. The Commission updated its forecast for GDP growth in August 2015, as needed to underpin the negotiations for the MoU required for an ESM programme. According to this forecast, real GDP in 2015-2016 is projected to contract by 2,3 % and 1,3 % respectively, (against a positive growth of 0,5 % and 2,9 % in the 2015 Spring Forecast for the corresponding years), before growing by 2,7 % in 2017 and 3,1 % in 2018. This marked worsening of the economic scenario in 2015-2016 implies a corresponding deterioration of the outlook for public finances given unchanged policies. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

Economic activity in Greece is currently projected to be much weaker than was expected when the latest amendment to Council Decision 2011/734/EU was adopted in December 2012. Both real and nominal GDP are expected to be at much lower levels in 2015 and 2016 than was expected in the 2015 Spring Forecast of the Commission, due to policy uncertainty, lack of implementation of reforms, a shortfall in government revenues, bank holidays, and the imposition of capital controls. The Commission updated its forecast for GDP growth in August 2015, as needed to underpin the negotiations for the MoU required for an ESM programme. According to this forecast, real GDP in 2015-2016 is projected to contract by 2,3 % and 1,3 % respectively, (against a positive growth of 0,5 % and 2,9 % in the 2015 Spring Forecast for the corresponding years), before growing by 2,7 % in 2017 and 3,1 % in 2018. This marked worsening of the economic scenario in 2015-2016 implies a corresponding deterioration of the outlook for public finances given unchanged policies.

| (11) | Greece is estimated to have improved its structural deficit by 16 percentage points of GDP from a 15,2 % deficit in 2009 to an estimated 1 % surplus in 2014, thus ensuring an improvement in the structural balance in 2009-2014, which is significantly larger than the requirement of at least 10 percentage points of GDP over the period recommended by the Council. In 2014, the general government deficit reached 3,5 % of GDP, clearly within the 4,5 % of GDP government deficit (ESA2010 basis) ceiling for 2014 established by the Council Decision. However, the primary balance outturn of 0,4 % of GDP was substantially weaker than expected and undershot the target set at 1,5 % of GDP due to a combination of factors including the reversal in the economic cycle and the related negative impact on budget revenues, the relaxation of fiscal policy and increased economic uncertainty. The weakening macroeconomic environment accompanied with expiring temporary fiscal measures in 2015 have, however, made it impossible to achieve the primary balance target of 3 % of GDP in 2015 envisaged in the latest amendment to Decision 2011/734/EU adopted in December 2012. The fiscal targets have, therefore, been revised down substantially, taking into account the macroeconomic circumstances and the current fiscal situation, to avoid overtightening fiscal policy in the short term. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

Greece is estimated to have improved its structural deficit by 16 percentage points of GDP from a 15,2 % deficit in 2009 to an estimated 1 % surplus in 2014, thus ensuring an improvement in the structural balance in 2009-2014, which is significantly larger than the requirement of at least 10 percentage points of GDP over the period recommended by the Council. In 2014, the general government deficit reached 3,5 % of GDP, clearly within the 4,5 % of GDP government deficit (ESA2010 basis) ceiling for 2014 established by the Council Decision. However, the primary balance outturn of 0,4 % of GDP was substantially weaker than expected and undershot the target set at 1,5 % of GDP due to a combination of factors including the reversal in the economic cycle and the related negative impact on budget revenues, the relaxation of fiscal policy and increased economic uncertainty. The weakening macroeconomic environment accompanied with expiring temporary fiscal measures in 2015 have, however, made it impossible to achieve the primary balance target of 3 % of GDP in 2015 envisaged in the latest amendment to Decision 2011/734/EU adopted in December 2012. The fiscal targets have, therefore, been revised down substantially, taking into account the macroeconomic circumstances and the current fiscal situation, to avoid overtightening fiscal policy in the short term.

| (12) | Greece will accordingly pursue a new fiscal path, premised on primary surplus targets of – 0,25, 0,5, 1,75, and 3,5 % of GDP in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and beyond, respectively. The trajectory of the fiscal targets is consistent with the expected growth rates of the Greek economy as it recovers from its deepest recorded recession. The revised path means that the general government budget deficit will fall below 3 % of GDP in 2017. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

Greece will accordingly pursue a new fiscal path, premised on primary surplus targets of – 0,25, 0,5, 1,75, and 3,5 % of GDP in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and beyond, respectively. The trajectory of the fiscal targets is consistent with the expected growth rates of the Greek economy as it recovers from its deepest recorded recession. The revised path means that the general government budget deficit will fall below 3 % of GDP in 2017.

| (13) | Under the Commission services' update of the forecast for nominal GDP growth, the primary general government balance is projected to attain a deficit of EUR 7 631 million (4,4 % of GDP) in 2015, a deficit of EUR 6 166 million (3,6 % of GDP) in 2016, a deficit of EUR 4 089 million (2,3 % of GDP) in 2017 and a deficit of EUR 753 million (0,4 % of GDP) in 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

Under the Commission services' update of the forecast for nominal GDP growth, the primary general government balance is projected to attain a deficit of EUR 7 631 million (4,4 % of GDP) in 2015, a deficit of EUR 6 166 million (3,6 % of GDP) in 2016, a deficit of EUR 4 089 million (2,3 % of GDP) in 2017 and a deficit of EUR 753 million (0,4 % of GDP) in 2018.

| (14) | The budget for 2016 to be adopted by the Greek parliament forms part of the Medium-Term Fiscal Strategy (MTFS) 2016-2019, with the aim to deliver a sizeable and front-loaded fiscal consolidation bringing savings of more than EUR 6 900 million, close to 4 % of GDP. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

The budget for 2016 to be adopted by the Greek parliament forms part of the Medium-Term Fiscal Strategy (MTFS) 2016-2019, with the aim to deliver a sizeable and front-loaded fiscal consolidation bringing savings of more than EUR 6 900 million, close to 4 % of GDP.

| (15) | The failure to complete the final EFSF programme review, the missed debt service payments, the expiration of the EFSF programme and the introduction of capital controls have created new circumstances that have led to a further strong deterioration in debt sustainability. This is due to lower growth estimates, a downward revision of the primary surplus targets, a downward revision of privatisation receipts, a strong deterioration in the financing needs of the banking sector following the imposition of capital controls, the need for a higher clearance of arrears following the liquidity shortage experienced by the sovereign and valuation effects due to the depreciation of the euro with respect to the SDR. As a result of these developments debt-to-GDP is expected to reach 198,3 % in 2016, before decreasing to 169,3 % in 2020, 154,5 % in 2022 and 115,9 % in 2030 in the baseline scenario. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

The failure to complete the final EFSF programme review, the missed debt service payments, the expiration of the EFSF programme and the introduction of capital controls have created new circumstances that have led to a further strong deterioration in debt sustainability. This is due to lower growth estimates, a downward revision of the primary surplus targets, a downward revision of privatisation receipts, a strong deterioration in the financing needs of the banking sector following the imposition of capital controls, the need for a higher clearance of arrears following the liquidity shortage experienced by the sovereign and valuation effects due to the depreciation of the euro with respect to the SDR. As a result of these developments debt-to-GDP is expected to reach 198,3 % in 2016, before decreasing to 169,3 % in 2020, 154,5 % in 2022 and 115,9 % in 2030 in the baseline scenario.

| (16) | Taking into account those developments, the adjustment path towards the correction of the excessive deficit needs to be updated. The commitment undertaken by Greece concerns not only the fiscal consolidation measures, but also those measures needed to enhance the growth-friendly nature and to minimise any negative social impact. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

Taking into account those developments, the adjustment path towards the correction of the excessive deficit needs to be updated. The commitment undertaken by Greece concerns not only the fiscal consolidation measures, but also those measures needed to enhance the growth-friendly nature and to minimise any negative social impact.

| (17) | Each measure required by Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1411 is instrumental in achieving the required budgetary adjustment. Some measures have a direct impact on the budgetary situation of Greece while the others are structural measures that will result in improved fiscal governance and a sounder budgetary situation in the medium term. |
| --- | --- |

(17)

Each measure required by Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1411 is instrumental in achieving the required budgetary adjustment. Some measures have a direct impact on the budgetary situation of Greece while the others are structural measures that will result in improved fiscal governance and a sounder budgetary situation in the medium term.

| (18) | In light of the above considerations, it appears necessary to revise the previous annual budgetary targets and the measures conducive to those targets. The new annual budgetary targets and measures conducive to those targets are those contained in Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1411, |
| --- | --- |

(18)

In light of the above considerations, it appears necessary to revise the previous annual budgetary targets and the measures conducive to those targets. The new annual budgetary targets and measures conducive to those targets are those contained in Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1411,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1.   Greece shall put an end to the present excessive deficit situation as rapidly as possible, and at the latest, by 2017.

2.   The adjustment path towards the correction of the excessive deficit shall aim to meet the annual general-government-deficit targets, as laid down in Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1411 and will be based on primary surplus targets of – 0,25, 0,5, 1,75, and 3,5 % of GDP in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and beyond, respectively. The trajectory of the fiscal targets is consistent with expected growth rates of the Greek economy as it recovers from its deepest recorded recession. The revised path means that the general government budget deficit will fall below 3 % of GDP in 2017.

3.   Greece shall adopt and fully implement all fiscal, economic and structural adjustment measures incorporated in the economic and financial adjustment programme as approved by Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1411.

4.   Greece shall stand ready to adopt further measures if risks to the budgetary plans materialise. Budgetary consolidation measures shall secure a lasting improvement in the general government structural balance in a growth-friendly manner.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its notification.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Hellenic Republic.

Done at Brussels, 19 August 2015.

For the Council

The President

J. ASSELBORN

---

(1)  OJ L 145, 11.6.2010, p. 6.

1

(2)  OJ L 296, 15.11.2011, p. 38.

2

(3)  Council Decision 2011/791/EU of 8 November 2011 (OJ L 320, 3.12.2011, p. 28), Council Decision 2012/211/EU of 13 March 2012 (OJ L 113, 25.4.2012, p. 8), Council Decision 2013/6/EU of 4 December 2012 (OJ L 4, 9.1.2013, p. 40).

3

(4)  OJ L 140, 27.5.2013, p. 1.

4

(5)  See page 12 of this Official Journal.

5

(6)  OJ L 209, 2.8.1997, p. 6.

6

---

| 20.8.2015 | EN | Službeni list Europske unije | L 219/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2015

EN

Službeni list Europske unije

L 219/12

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2015/1411

of 19 August 2015

approving the macroeconomic adjustment programme of Greece

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 472/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on the strengthening of economic and budgetary surveillance of Member States in the euro area experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability (1), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 136(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’) foresees the possibility of adopting measures specific to Member States whose currency is the euro in order to ensure the proper functioning of economic and monetary union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 136(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’) foresees the possibility of adopting measures specific to Member States whose currency is the euro in order to ensure the proper functioning of economic and monetary union.

| (2) | Since 2010, Greece has been granted financial assistance by the Member States and the International Monetary Fund (‘IMF’). A first Economic Adjustment Programme for Greece was been agreed on 2 May 2010: the euro area Member States agreed to provide bilateral loans, pooled by the European Commission, for a total amount of EUR 80 000 million to be disbursed over the period May 2010 through June 2013 and the IMF committing additional EUR 30 000 million under a stand-by arrangement. The Second Economic Adjustment Programme for Greece was approved on 14 March 2012. The euro area Member States and the IMF committed the undisbursed amounts of the first programme plus an additional EUR 130 000 million for the years 2012-2014. Whereas the financing of the first programme was based on bilateral loans, it was agreed that — on the side of euro area Member States — the second programme would be financed by the European Financial Stability Facility (‘EFSF’), which had been fully operational since August 2010. In total, the second programme foresaw financial assistance of EUR 164 500 million until the end of 2014 (the period was later extended until the end of June 2015). Of that sum, the euro area commitment amounts to EUR 144 700 million to be provided via the EFSF, while the IMF contributed EUR 19 800 million, as part of a four-year EUR 28 000 million arrangement under the Extended Fund Facility for Greece that the IMF approved in March 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Since 2010, Greece has been granted financial assistance by the Member States and the International Monetary Fund (‘IMF’). A first Economic Adjustment Programme for Greece was been agreed on 2 May 2010: the euro area Member States agreed to provide bilateral loans, pooled by the European Commission, for a total amount of EUR 80 000 million to be disbursed over the period May 2010 through June 2013 and the IMF committing additional EUR 30 000 million under a stand-by arrangement. The Second Economic Adjustment Programme for Greece was approved on 14 March 2012. The euro area Member States and the IMF committed the undisbursed amounts of the first programme plus an additional EUR 130 000 million for the years 2012-2014. Whereas the financing of the first programme was based on bilateral loans, it was agreed that — on the side of euro area Member States — the second programme would be financed by the European Financial Stability Facility (‘EFSF’), which had been fully operational since August 2010. In total, the second programme foresaw financial assistance of EUR 164 500 million until the end of 2014 (the period was later extended until the end of June 2015). Of that sum, the euro area commitment amounts to EUR 144 700 million to be provided via the EFSF, while the IMF contributed EUR 19 800 million, as part of a four-year EUR 28 000 million arrangement under the Extended Fund Facility for Greece that the IMF approved in March 2012.

| (3) | On 8 July 2015, in view of the ongoing severe economic and financial disturbance, the Greek authorities requested financial assistance from the European Stability Mechanism (‘ESM’) in order to ensure a properly-functioning Greek banking system, to meet Greece's debt obligations, to support the return of Greece's economy to sustainable growth and safeguard financial stability of the euro area and of its Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 8 July 2015, in view of the ongoing severe economic and financial disturbance, the Greek authorities requested financial assistance from the European Stability Mechanism (‘ESM’) in order to ensure a properly-functioning Greek banking system, to meet Greece's debt obligations, to support the return of Greece's economy to sustainable growth and safeguard financial stability of the euro area and of its Member States.

| (4) | Pursuant to Article 13(1) of the ESM Treaty, and to form the basis for a decision of the ESM Board of Governors, in line with Article 13(2) thereof, whether to grant, in principle, stability support to Greece in the form of a loan, on 8 July 2015 the Chairperson of the ESM Board of Governors entrusted the European Commission, in liaison with the European Central Bank (‘ECB’), with assessing the existence of a risk to the financial stability of the euro area as a whole or its Member States; assessing, together with the IMF, whether public debt is sustainable; and estimating the actual or potential financing needs of Greece. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Pursuant to Article 13(1) of the ESM Treaty, and to form the basis for a decision of the ESM Board of Governors, in line with Article 13(2) thereof, whether to grant, in principle, stability support to Greece in the form of a loan, on 8 July 2015 the Chairperson of the ESM Board of Governors entrusted the European Commission, in liaison with the European Central Bank (‘ECB’), with assessing the existence of a risk to the financial stability of the euro area as a whole or its Member States; assessing, together with the IMF, whether public debt is sustainable; and estimating the actual or potential financing needs of Greece.

| (5) | In compliance with Article 13 of the ESM Treaty, the European Commission, in liaison with the ECB, and with input from IMF staff, completed those assessments on 10 July 2015, concluding that conditions for the financial support for Greece, to be provided in the form of an ESM loan, are in place. The financing needs were estimated to be up to EUR 86 000 million. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

In compliance with Article 13 of the ESM Treaty, the European Commission, in liaison with the ECB, and with input from IMF staff, completed those assessments on 10 July 2015, concluding that conditions for the financial support for Greece, to be provided in the form of an ESM loan, are in place. The financing needs were estimated to be up to EUR 86 000 million.

| (6) | On 17 July 2015, Greece was granted EUR 7 160 million short-term financial assistance under the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (‘EFSM’), by Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1181 (2), for facing July 2015 repayment obligations and settling its arrears to the IMF. The assistance was disbursed in one instalment on 20 July 2015, and was linked to economic policy conditionality. The ESM assistance will be used, inter alia, to repay that short-term EFSM bridge loan. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

On 17 July 2015, Greece was granted EUR 7 160 million short-term financial assistance under the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (‘EFSM’), by Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1181 (2), for facing July 2015 repayment obligations and settling its arrears to the IMF. The assistance was disbursed in one instalment on 20 July 2015, and was linked to economic policy conditionality. The ESM assistance will be used, inter alia, to repay that short-term EFSM bridge loan.

| (7) | On 16 July 2015, the ESM Board of Governors invited the Commission, in liaison with the ECB, the ESM, the Greek authorities, and, where appropriate, the IMF, to agree on a macroeconomic adjustment programme for Greece. The programme was prepared in accordance with the procedure provided for under Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 472/2013. On 11 August 2015, those institutions reached an agreement at technical level on a macroeconomic adjustment programme (the ‘Programme’) with the Greek Government. The Programme submitted by Greece to the Commission and the Council aims at ensuring the adoption of a set of reforms needed to improve the sustainability of public finances, as well as to ensure financial stability and to promote growth, employment, and social fairness. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

On 16 July 2015, the ESM Board of Governors invited the Commission, in liaison with the ECB, the ESM, the Greek authorities, and, where appropriate, the IMF, to agree on a macroeconomic adjustment programme for Greece. The programme was prepared in accordance with the procedure provided for under Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 472/2013. On 11 August 2015, those institutions reached an agreement at technical level on a macroeconomic adjustment programme (the ‘Programme’) with the Greek Government. The Programme submitted by Greece to the Commission and the Council aims at ensuring the adoption of a set of reforms needed to improve the sustainability of public finances, as well as to ensure financial stability and to promote growth, employment, and social fairness.

| (8) | Following that agreement, Greece should adopt a comprehensive policy package, to be implemented in a three-year macroeconomic adjustment programme which would span from the third quarter of 2015 to the third quarter of 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

Following that agreement, Greece should adopt a comprehensive policy package, to be implemented in a three-year macroeconomic adjustment programme which would span from the third quarter of 2015 to the third quarter of 2018.

| (9) | The comprehensive policy package, to be laid down in an ESM Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality (the ‘Memorandum of Understanding’), should aim at restoring financial market confidence, re-establishing sound macroeconomic balances and enabling the economy to return to sustainable growth. It should be structured on four pillars: restoring fiscal sustainability, safeguarding financial stability, enhancing competitiveness and growth, and modernising the state and the public administration. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The comprehensive policy package, to be laid down in an ESM Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality (the ‘Memorandum of Understanding’), should aim at restoring financial market confidence, re-establishing sound macroeconomic balances and enabling the economy to return to sustainable growth. It should be structured on four pillars: restoring fiscal sustainability, safeguarding financial stability, enhancing competitiveness and growth, and modernising the state and the public administration.

| (10) | The Commission services updated their forecast for nominal GDP growth in August 2015, as needed to underpin the negotiations for the ESM programme. Under this forecast, which centres around a nominal GDP growth rate of – 3,2 % in 2015, – 0,7 % in 2016, 3,4 % in 2017, 4,1 % in 2018 and 4,2 % in 2019, the debt-to-GDP ratio would amount to 196,3 % in 2015, 200,9 % in 2016, 198,6 % in 2017, 190,7 % in 2018 and 182,3 % in 2019. The debt-to-GDP ratio would therefore increase until 2016 and move to a declining path thereafter, reaching an estimated 174,5 % in 2020, with debt dynamics affected by several below-the-line operations. Under the Commission services' update of the forecast for nominal GDP growth, the primary general government balance is projected to attain a deficit of EUR 7 631 million (4,4 % of GDP) in 2015, a deficit of EUR 6 166 million (3,6 % of GDP) in 2016, a deficit of EUR 4 089 million (2,3 % of GDP) in 2017 and a deficit of EUR 753 million (0,4 % of GDP) in 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

The Commission services updated their forecast for nominal GDP growth in August 2015, as needed to underpin the negotiations for the ESM programme. Under this forecast, which centres around a nominal GDP growth rate of – 3,2 % in 2015, – 0,7 % in 2016, 3,4 % in 2017, 4,1 % in 2018 and 4,2 % in 2019, the debt-to-GDP ratio would amount to 196,3 % in 2015, 200,9 % in 2016, 198,6 % in 2017, 190,7 % in 2018 and 182,3 % in 2019. The debt-to-GDP ratio would therefore increase until 2016 and move to a declining path thereafter, reaching an estimated 174,5 % in 2020, with debt dynamics affected by several below-the-line operations. Under the Commission services' update of the forecast for nominal GDP growth, the primary general government balance is projected to attain a deficit of EUR 7 631 million (4,4 % of GDP) in 2015, a deficit of EUR 6 166 million (3,6 % of GDP) in 2016, a deficit of EUR 4 089 million (2,3 % of GDP) in 2017 and a deficit of EUR 753 million (0,4 % of GDP) in 2018.

| (11) | The authorities will pursue a new fiscal path premised on primary surplus targets of – 0,25, 0,5, 1,75, and 3,5 % of GDP in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and beyond, respectively. The trajectory of the fiscal targets is consistent with expected growth rates of the Greek economy as it recovers from its deepest recorded recession. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

The authorities will pursue a new fiscal path premised on primary surplus targets of – 0,25, 0,5, 1,75, and 3,5 % of GDP in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and beyond, respectively. The trajectory of the fiscal targets is consistent with expected growth rates of the Greek economy as it recovers from its deepest recorded recession.

| (12) | Enhancing the long-term resilience of the Greek banking sector is critical to restoring financial stability in Greece and to preserving financial stability in the euro area as a whole. To preserve the liquidity of the Greek banking sector, temporary administrative measures were imposed, including capital controls. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

Enhancing the long-term resilience of the Greek banking sector is critical to restoring financial stability in Greece and to preserving financial stability in the euro area as a whole. To preserve the liquidity of the Greek banking sector, temporary administrative measures were imposed, including capital controls.

| (13) | The implementation of comprehensive and ambitious reforms in financial, fiscal and structural areas should safeguard the medium-term sustainability of the Greek public debt. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

The implementation of comprehensive and ambitious reforms in financial, fiscal and structural areas should safeguard the medium-term sustainability of the Greek public debt.

| (14) | The Commission, in liaison with the ECB and, where appropriate, the IMF, should verify at regular intervals the rigorous implementation of Greece's Programme through missions and regular reporting, on a quarterly basis, by the Greek authorities. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

The Commission, in liaison with the ECB and, where appropriate, the IMF, should verify at regular intervals the rigorous implementation of Greece's Programme through missions and regular reporting, on a quarterly basis, by the Greek authorities.

| (15) | Throughout the implementation of Greece's comprehensive policy package, the Commission should provide additional policy advice and technical assistance in specific areas. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

Throughout the implementation of Greece's comprehensive policy package, the Commission should provide additional policy advice and technical assistance in specific areas.

| (16) | The Greek authorities should involve, in accordance with current national rules and practices, the social partners and civil society organisations in the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the Programme. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

The Greek authorities should involve, in accordance with current national rules and practices, the social partners and civil society organisations in the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the Programme.

| (17) | Any form of financial assistance received by Greece to help it implement the policies under its Programme should be in line with the legal requirements and policies of the Union, in particular the Union's economic governance framework. Any intervention in support of financial institutions should be carried out in accordance with the Union's rules on competition. The Commission should ensure that any measures laid down in a Memorandum of Understanding in the context of requested ESM financial assistance are fully consistent with this Decision, |
| --- | --- |

(17)

Any form of financial assistance received by Greece to help it implement the policies under its Programme should be in line with the legal requirements and policies of the Union, in particular the Union's economic governance framework. Any intervention in support of financial institutions should be carried out in accordance with the Union's rules on competition. The Commission should ensure that any measures laid down in a Memorandum of Understanding in the context of requested ESM financial assistance are fully consistent with this Decision,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1.   In order to facilitate the return of the Greek economy to a path of sustainable growth and to fiscal and financial stability, Greece shall rigorously implement the Programme, the main elements of which are laid down in Article 2 of this Decision. The Programme shall address the specific risks emanating from Greece for the financial stability of the euro area and shall aim to rapidly re-establish a sound and sustainable economic and financial situation in Greece and restore its capacity to finance itself fully on the international financial markets. The Programme shall take due account of the Council recommendations addressed to Greece under Articles 121, 126, 136 and 148 TFEU as well as Greece's actions to comply with them, while aiming to broaden, strengthen and deepen the policy measures required.

2.   The Commission, in liaison with the ECB and, where appropriate, the IMF, shall monitor Greece's progress in implementing its Programme. Greece shall give the Commission and the ECB its full cooperation. It shall, in particular, provide them with all the information that they deem necessary for the monitoring of the Programme.

3.   The Commission, in liaison with the ECB and, where appropriate, the IMF, shall examine with the Greek authorities any changes and updates to the Programme that may be needed in order to take proper account of, inter alia, any significant gap between macroeconomic and fiscal forecasts and realised figures, negative spillover effects, as well as macroeconomic and financial shocks.

In order to ensure the smooth implementation of the Programme and to help the correction of imbalances in a sustainable way, the Commission shall provide continued advice and guidance on fiscal, financial market and structural reforms.

The Commission shall at regular intervals assess the economic impact of the Programme and shall recommend necessary corrections with a view to enhancing growth and job creation, securing the necessary fiscal consolidation, and minimising harmful social impacts.

Article 2

1.   The key objectives of the Programme shall be: restoring fiscal sustainability, safeguarding financial stability, enhancing competitiveness and growth, and modernising the state and the public administration.

2.   Greece shall pursue fiscal consolidation by means of high-quality permanent measures while minimising the impact on disadvantaged people. The Greek authorities commit to ensuring sustainable public finances and achieve sizeable and sustainable primary surpluses over the medium-term that will reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio steadily. The authorities shall accordingly pursue a new fiscal path premised on primary surplus targets of – 0,25, 0,5, 1,75, and 3,5 per cent of GDP in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and beyond, respectively. Greece shall target a medium-term primary surplus of 3,5 % of GDP to be achieved through a combination of upfront parametric fiscal reforms, including to its VAT and pension system, supported by an ambitious programme to strengthen tax compliance and public financial management, and fight tax evasion, while ensuring adequate protection of vulnerable groups. In addition to the measures above, the authorities commit to legislate in October 2015 credible structural measures yielding at least 0,75 % of GDP coming into effect in 2017 and 0,25 % of GDP coming into effect in 2018 to support the achievement of the medium-term primary balance target of 3,5 % of GDP. The authorities commit to take further structural measures in October 2016, if needed to secure the 2017 and 2018 targets. Those would include containing defence expenditure, the planned personal income tax reform and freezing statutory spending. Parametric fiscal measures shall be bolstered by a wide range of administrative actions to address shortfalls in tax collection and enforcement. The Greek Government shall monitor fiscal risks, including court rulings, and shall take offsetting measures as needed to meet the fiscal targets. The authorities intend to transfer at least 30 % of any over-performance to the segregated account earmarked for debt reduction. In addition, another 30 % of the over-performance would be used for clearing unpaid government obligations linked to the past.

3.   Greece shall adopt the measures specified below:

| (i) | take measures in the short term to raise revenues and to target and contain expenditure. Among the measures to raise revenue, Greece shall gradually abolish the refund of excise tax on diesel oil for farmers and increase the tonnage tax. The authorities shall take actions to launch the 2015 property tax (ENFIA) exercise in order to issue bills in October 2015 with the final instalment due in February 2016. They shall also correct identified issues with the revenue measures recently implemented. The authorities also committed to target and contain expenditure by reducing the cost of healthcare and launching the comprehensive social welfare review. The package includes further measures with budgetary impact, such as public administration reforms, reforms addressing shortfalls in tax collection enforcement, and other parametric measures; |
| --- | --- |

(i)

take measures in the short term to raise revenues and to target and contain expenditure. Among the measures to raise revenue, Greece shall gradually abolish the refund of excise tax on diesel oil for farmers and increase the tonnage tax. The authorities shall take actions to launch the 2015 property tax (ENFIA) exercise in order to issue bills in October 2015 with the final instalment due in February 2016. They shall also correct identified issues with the revenue measures recently implemented. The authorities also committed to target and contain expenditure by reducing the cost of healthcare and launching the comprehensive social welfare review. The package includes further measures with budgetary impact, such as public administration reforms, reforms addressing shortfalls in tax collection enforcement, and other parametric measures;

| (ii) | to demonstrate its commitment to credible fiscal policies, adopt in October 2015, a supplementary 2015 budget as needed, the draft 2016 budget and a 2016-2019 Medium-Term Fiscal Strategy, supported by a sizable and credible package of parametric measures and structural fiscal reforms; |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

to demonstrate its commitment to credible fiscal policies, adopt in October 2015, a supplementary 2015 budget as needed, the draft 2016 budget and a 2016-2019 Medium-Term Fiscal Strategy, supported by a sizable and credible package of parametric measures and structural fiscal reforms;

| (iii) | enact reforms of both direct and indirect taxation to improve efficiency, collectability and boost labour supply. To break from past practice and improve the tax and social security payment culture, the Government shall take strong action to improve collection, and neither introduce new instalment or other amnesty or settlement schemes nor extend existing schemes; |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

enact reforms of both direct and indirect taxation to improve efficiency, collectability and boost labour supply. To break from past practice and improve the tax and social security payment culture, the Government shall take strong action to improve collection, and neither introduce new instalment or other amnesty or settlement schemes nor extend existing schemes;

| (iv) | continue reforms that aim at improving the budget process and expenditure controls, clearing arrears, and strengthening budget reporting and cash management. The Government is committed to making the Fiscal Council operational; |
| --- | --- |

(iv)

continue reforms that aim at improving the budget process and expenditure controls, clearing arrears, and strengthening budget reporting and cash management. The Government is committed to making the Fiscal Council operational;

| (v) | take further action in the area of public procurement to increase efficiency and transparency of the Greek public procurement system, prevent misconduct, and ensure more accountability and control. Policies will be agreed with the European Commission, which shall assist with the implementation of an action plan; |
| --- | --- |

(v)

take further action in the area of public procurement to increase efficiency and transparency of the Greek public procurement system, prevent misconduct, and ensure more accountability and control. Policies will be agreed with the European Commission, which shall assist with the implementation of an action plan;

| (vi) | implement fully the existing reforms and also proceed with further reforms to strengthen long-term sustainability, targeting savings of around 0,25 % of GDP in 2015 and around 1 % of GDP by 2016. The package inter alia aims to create strong disincentives for early retirement through increasing early retirement penalties and by the gradual elimination of the grandfathering of rights to retire before the statutory retirement age; |
| --- | --- |

(vi)

implement fully the existing reforms and also proceed with further reforms to strengthen long-term sustainability, targeting savings of around 0,25 % of GDP in 2015 and around 1 % of GDP by 2016. The package inter alia aims to create strong disincentives for early retirement through increasing early retirement penalties and by the gradual elimination of the grandfathering of rights to retire before the statutory retirement age;

| (vii) | continue reforming the healthcare sector, controlling public expenditure, managing prices of pharmaceuticals, improve hospital management, increase centralised procurement of hospital supplies, manage demand for pharmaceuticals and health care through evidence-based e-prescription protocols, commission private sector healthcare providers in a cost-effective manner, modernise IT systems, developing a new electronic referral system for primary and secondary care that allows the formulation of care pathways for patients; |
| --- | --- |

(vii)

continue reforming the healthcare sector, controlling public expenditure, managing prices of pharmaceuticals, improve hospital management, increase centralised procurement of hospital supplies, manage demand for pharmaceuticals and health care through evidence-based e-prescription protocols, commission private sector healthcare providers in a cost-effective manner, modernise IT systems, developing a new electronic referral system for primary and secondary care that allows the formulation of care pathways for patients;

| (viii) | adopt by March 2016 a further series of guaranteed employment support schemes with individualised active labour market measures for participants, using local partnerships, involving the private and social economy sectors and ensuring the efficient and effective use of the resources available.
  Achieving a fairer society will require that Greece improve the design of its welfare system, so that there is a genuine social safety net which targets scarce resources at those in most need. The authorities plan to benefit from available technical assistance from international organisations for the social welfare review and for the guaranteed minimum income implementation. |
| --- | --- |

(viii)

adopt by March 2016 a further series of guaranteed employment support schemes with individualised active labour market measures for participants, using local partnerships, involving the private and social economy sectors and ensuring the efficient and effective use of the resources available.

Achieving a fairer society will require that Greece improve the design of its welfare system, so that there is a genuine social safety net which targets scarce resources at those in most need. The authorities plan to benefit from available technical assistance from international organisations for the social welfare review and for the guaranteed minimum income implementation.

4.   To safeguard financial stability, Greece shall immediately take steps to tackle Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) and restore liquidity and capital in the banking system. A recapitalisation process of banks should be completed before the end of 2015, which shall be accompanied by concomitant measures to strengthen the governance of the Hellenic Financial Stability Fund (‘HFSF’) and of banks. Further measures involve the resolution of Non-Performing Loans (‘NPLs’) and the governance of the HFSF and of banks.

5.   To promote growth, competitiveness and investment, Greece shall design and implement a wide range of reforms in labour markets and product markets (including energy) that not only ensure full compliance with European Union requirements, but also aim at achieving European best practices. More open markets are essential to create economic opportunities and improve social fairness, by curtailing rent-seeking and monopolistic behaviour, which has translated into higher prices and lower living standards. In line with their growth strategy, the authorities shall intensify their efforts to bring key initiatives and reform proposals to fruition as well as enrich the agenda with further ambitious reforms that shall support the country's return to sustainable growth, attract investments and create jobs.

6.   The Greek energy markets need wide-ranging reforms to bring them in line with Union legislation and policies, make them more modern and competitive, reduce monopolistic rents and inefficiencies, promote innovation, favour the wider adoption of renewables and gas, and ensure the transfer of benefits of all these changes to consumers. The authorities shall adopt the reform of the gas market and its specific roadmap, leading inter alia to full eligibility to switch supplier for all customers by 2018, and notify the reformed capacity payments system (including a temporary and a permanent mechanism) and New Organisation of Markets in Electricity products to the Commission. In any case, by 2020 no undertaking shall be permitted to produce or import, directly or indirectly, more than 50 % of total electricity produced and imported in Greece.

7.   There shall be an ambitious privatisation programme and policies which support investment. The Government commits to facilitate the privatisation process and complete all needed Government actions to allow tenders to be executed successfully. In this respect the Government shall complete all actions needed as agreed on a quarterly basis between the Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund (‘HRADF’), the institutions and the Government. The List of Government Pending Actions has been approved by the Board of Directors of the HRADF. In line with the statement of the Euro Summit of 12 July 2015, a new independent fund (the ‘Fund’) shall be established and have in its possession valuable Greek assets. The overarching objective of the Fund is to manage valuable Greek assets; and to protect, create and ultimately maximise their value which it shall monetise through privatisations and other means.

8.   A modern state and public administration shall be a key priority of the Programme. Particular attention shall be paid to increasing the efficiency of the public sector in the delivery of essential public goods and services. Measures shall be taken to enhance the efficiency of the judicial system and to upgrade the fight against corruption. Reforms shall strengthen the institutional and operational independence of key institutions such as the revenue administration and the statistics institute (Elstat).

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Hellenic Republic.

Done at Brussels, 19 August 2015.

For the Council

The President

J. ASSELBORN

---

(1)  OJ L 140, 27.5.2013, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 192, 18.7.2015, p. 15.

2

---

AKTI KOJE DONOSE TIJELA STVORENA MEĐUNARODNIM SPORAZUMIMA

| 20.8.2015 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | L 219/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2015

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

L 219/17

---

ODLUKA br. 1 ODBORA ZA TRGOVINU ROBOM IZMEĐU EU-A I KOREJE

od 28. svibnja 2015.

o donošenju pravila upravljanja tarifnim kvotama i njihovoj provedbi [2015/1412]

ODBOR ZA TRGOVINU ROBOM,

uzimajući u obzir Sporazum o slobodnoj trgovini između Republike Koreje („Koreja”), s jedne strane, i Europske unije i njezinih država članica, s druge strane, („stranke” i „Sporazum”), a posebno njegove članke 2.16., 15.2.1. i Dodatak 2-A-1 točke 2. i 3.,

budući da:

| (1) | Člankom 15.1. Sporazuma osniva se Odbor za trgovinu koji, među ostalim, osigurava da Sporazum uredno djeluje i nadzire rad svih specijaliziranih odbora. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Člankom 15.1. Sporazuma osniva se Odbor za trgovinu koji, među ostalim, osigurava da Sporazum uredno djeluje i nadzire rad svih specijaliziranih odbora.

| (2) | U skladu s člankom 15.2. Sporazuma, specijalizirani odbori osnivaju se pod pokroviteljstvom Odbora za trgovinu. Jedan od tih specijaliziranih odbora je, u skladu s člankom 2.16. Sporazuma, Odbor za trgovinu robom. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

U skladu s člankom 15.2. Sporazuma, specijalizirani odbori osnivaju se pod pokroviteljstvom Odbora za trgovinu. Jedan od tih specijaliziranih odbora je, u skladu s člankom 2.16. Sporazuma, Odbor za trgovinu robom.

| (3) | U skladu s točkom 2. Dodatka 2-A-1 Sporazumu Koreja može za upravljanje i provedbu tarifnih kvota za određenu robu podrijetlom iz Europske unije na temelju Sporazuma rabiti dražbeni sustav. Uvjete dražbenog sustava moraju sporazumno utvrditi stranke Sporazuma odlukom Odbora za trgovinu robom. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

U skladu s točkom 2. Dodatka 2-A-1 Sporazumu Koreja može za upravljanje i provedbu tarifnih kvota za određenu robu podrijetlom iz Europske unije na temelju Sporazuma rabiti dražbeni sustav. Uvjete dražbenog sustava moraju sporazumno utvrditi stranke Sporazuma odlukom Odbora za trgovinu robom.

| (4) | U skladu s točkom 3. Dodatka 2-A-1 Sporazumu, Koreja može upotrijebiti sustav izdavanja dozvola za upravljanje određenim tarifnim kvotama i njihovu provedbu. Stranke se u okviru Odbora za trgovinu robom dogovaraju o politici i postupcima koji se tiču sustava dozvola, uključujući i podobnost za dobivanje količina tarifnih kvota, te o svim promjenama politike ili postupaka, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

U skladu s točkom 3. Dodatka 2-A-1 Sporazumu, Koreja može upotrijebiti sustav izdavanja dozvola za upravljanje određenim tarifnim kvotama i njihovu provedbu. Stranke se u okviru Odbora za trgovinu robom dogovaraju o politici i postupcima koji se tiču sustava dozvola, uključujući i podobnost za dobivanje količina tarifnih kvota, te o svim promjenama politike ili postupaka,

ODLUČIO JE:

| 1. | Koreja upravlja tarifnim kvotama i provodi ih na određenu robu podrijetlom iz Europske unije na temelju Sporazuma o slobodnoj trgovini između Republike Koreje, s jedne strane, i Europske unije i njezinih država članica, s druge strane, u skladu s pravilima navedenim u Prilogu ovoj Odluci. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Koreja upravlja tarifnim kvotama i provodi ih na određenu robu podrijetlom iz Europske unije na temelju Sporazuma o slobodnoj trgovini između Republike Koreje, s jedne strane, i Europske unije i njezinih država članica, s druge strane, u skladu s pravilima navedenim u Prilogu ovoj Odluci.

| 2. | Ova Odluka stupa na snagu na dan donošenja. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ova Odluka stupa na snagu na dan donošenja.

Sastavljeno 28. svibnja 2015.

Za Odbor za trgovinu robom

Helena KÖNIG

Vršiteljica dužnosti direktora

Glavna uprava za trgovinu Europske komisije

Chang K. KIM

Glavni direktor Uprave za trgovinsku politiku

Ministarstvo trgovine, industrije i energetike Republike Koreje

---

PRILOG

PRAVILA ZA UPRAVLJANJE TARIFNIM KVOTAMA I ZA NJIHOVU PROVEDBU

Članak 1.

Vremenski raspored dražbi i zahtjeva za dozvolu

1.   Dražbe za obrano mlijeko u prahu, punomasno mlijeko u prahu, kondenzirano mlijeko i prirodni med održavaju se prije razdoblja uvoza, tj. u lipnju za kvote koje se otvaraju u srpnju.

2.   Posebnim smjernicama tvrtke Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation određuje se da se dražbe moraju javno objaviti osam kalendarskih dana prije roka za predaju prijava za sudjelovanje na dražbi.

3.   Za proizvode čiji rok zahtjeva za dozvolu kvote nije određen u Sporazumu o slobodnoj trgovini između Koreje i EU-a, posebnim se smjernicama agencija određenih da upravljaju tarifnim kvotama (dalje u tekstu: „Agencije koje izdaju preporuke”) određuje razdoblje za predaju zahtjeva za dozvole od najmanje sedam kalendarskih dana od prvog radnog dana godine provedbe navedena u Dodatku 2-A točki 5. Sporazuma o slobodnoj trgovini između Koreje i EU-a.

Članak 2.

Depozit i naknade

1.   Za usluge u vezi s podnošenjem zahtjeva za dodjelu tarifnih kvota dražbom neće se naplaćivati nikakvi administrativni troškovi ni naknade osim depozita – iznosa koji sudionici dražbe plaćaju za dražbu.

2.   Opće upute sudionicima dražbe za svaku dražbu određivat će da se depozit vraća sudionicima dražbe čim to uobičajeni upravni postupci dopuštaju nakon završetka dražbe.

3.   Od podnositelja zahtjeva za dozvolu ne traže se ni jamstvo ni depozit.

Članak 3.

Izdavanje i važenje preporuke

1.   Agencije koje izdaju preporuke nakon dražbe ili podnošenja zahtjeva za dozvolu izdaju preporuku za uvozne tarifne kvote za Sporazum o slobodnoj trgovini između Koreje i EU-a (dalje u tekstu: „Preporuka”).

2.   Preporuke se izdaju podnositeljima zahtjeva u roku od dva kalendarska dana ako zahtjev za preporuku tarifne kvote zadovoljava uvjete preporuke.

3.   Preporuka za uvoz za tarifne kvote vrijedi 90 dana. Razdoblje valjanosti može se produžiti za dodatnih 30 dana, ali ne može prekoračiti zadnji dan godine provedbe navedene u Prilogu 2-A točki 5. Sporazuma o slobodnoj trgovini između Koreje i EU-a.

Članak 4.

Objavljivanje informacija o upravljanju tarifnim kvotama

1.   Smjernice Ministarstva poljoprivrede, prehrane i ruralnih poslova Koreje (dalje u tekstu: „MAFRA”) i posebne smjernice Agencija koje izdaju preporuke objavljuju se na njihovim web-mjestima.

2.   Agencije koje izdaju preporuke redovito na svojim web-mjestima objavljuju informacije kojima su obuhvaćeni javna objava zahtjeva za dozvole i dražbi, dodjela dozvola i razdoblja dražbi, dodijeljene količine, preostale količine koje su dostupne za svaku tarifnu kvotu i planirani datumi iduće dražbe/razdoblja izdavanja dozvola.

3.   Osnovni kriteriji za dražbe koji obuhvaćaju podobnost, plaćanje i povrat depozita, datume dražbi, kodove dražbi i informacije nalazit će se u posebnim smjernicama tvrtke Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation ili u općim uputama sudionicima dražbe za svaku dražbu.

Članak 5.

Pravila dodjele tarifnih kvota

Smjernicama MAFRA-e dopušta se raspodjela godišnje količine tarifnih kvota tijekom cijele godine podjelom godišnje količine tarifnih kvota u nekoliko podkoličina čiji je zbroj jednak godišnjoj količini tarifnih kvota. Ukupna količina tarifnih kvota za svaku godinu provedbe kako je ona određena Sporazumom o slobodnoj trgovini između Koreje i EU-a ne smanjuje se.

Upravljanje tarifnim kvotama: Pojmovnik

| Agencije koje izdaju preporuke | Korejske agencije određene za upravljanje tarifnim kvotama: Korea Dairy Industries Association, Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation, Korea Feed Ingredients Association i Korea Feed Milk Replacer Association

  Web-mjesta: | Korea Dairy Industries Association (dostupna je samo verzija teksta na korejskom):
  http://www.koreadia.or.kr/ |
| --- | --- | --- |

Agencije koje izdaju preporuke

Korejske agencije određene za upravljanje tarifnim kvotama: Korea Dairy Industries Association, Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation, Korea Feed Ingredients Association i Korea Feed Milk Replacer Association

Web-mjesta:

Korea Dairy Industries Association (dostupna je samo verzija teksta na korejskom):

http://www.koreadia.or.kr/

| | Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation:
  http://www.at.or.kr/home/apen000000/index.action |
| --- | --- |

Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation:

http://www.at.or.kr/home/apen000000/index.action

| | Korea Feed Ingredients Association (dostupna je samo verzija teksta na korejskom):
  http://www.kfeedia.org/main.html |
| --- | --- |

Korea Feed Ingredients Association (dostupna je samo verzija teksta na korejskom):

http://www.kfeedia.org/main.html

| | Korea Feed Milk Replacer Association (dostupna je samo verzija teksta na korejskom):
  http://milkreplacer.or.kr/ |
| --- | --- |

Korea Feed Milk Replacer Association (dostupna je samo verzija teksta na korejskom):

http://milkreplacer.or.kr/

Depozit

Iznos koji plaćaju ponuđači koji žele sudjelovati na dražbi. Depozit se odmah po preporuci kvote vraća svakom ponuđaču.

Preporuka

Pitanje uvoznih tarifnih kvota nakon dražbe ili podnošenja zahtjeva za dozvolu.

Razdoblje valjanosti

Razdoblje tijekom kojeg preporuka uvoznih tarifnih kvota vrijedi.

Godina provedbe

Razdoblje od 12 mjeseci između uzastopnih godišnjica Sporazuma o slobodnoj trgovini (1. srpnja) za koje je godišnja količina tarifne kvote propisana Sporazumom o slobodnoj trgovini između Koreje i EU-a.

---