alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023032EN.01041401.xml

| 27.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/414 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/414

---

P9_TA(2022)0259

Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Stephanus Abraham Blok

European Parliament decision of 23 June 2022 on the nomination of Stephanus Abraham Blok as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C9-0150/2022 — 2022/0805(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2023/C 32/21)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0150/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0150/2022),

| — | having regard to Rule 129 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 129 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0180/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0180/2022),

| A. | whereas, by letter of 8 April 2022, the Council consulted Parliament on the nomination of Stephanus Abraham Blok as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas, by letter of 8 April 2022, the Council consulted Parliament on the nomination of Stephanus Abraham Blok as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

| B. | whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control then proceeded to evaluate Mr Blok’s credentials, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; whereas in carrying out that evaluation, the committee received a curriculum vitae from Mr Blok as well as his replies to the written questionnaire that he had been sent; |
| --- | --- |

B.

whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control then proceeded to evaluate Mr Blok’s credentials, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; whereas in carrying out that evaluation, the committee received a curriculum vitae from Mr Blok as well as his replies to the written questionnaire that he had been sent;

| C. | whereas the committee subsequently held a hearing with Mr Blok on 15 June 2022, at which he made an opening statement and then answered questions put by the members of the committee; |
| --- | --- |

C.

whereas the committee subsequently held a hearing with Mr Blok on 15 June 2022, at which he made an opening statement and then answered questions put by the members of the committee;

| 1. | Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Stephanus Abraham Blok as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, to the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2741 

To authorize the United States Postal Service to inspect the contents of 

certain suspicious packages for illicit materials without a warrant. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 24, 2018 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize the United States Postal Service to inspect 

the contents of certain suspicious packages for illicit 

materials without a warrant. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Search Now, Inspect 

5 for Fentanyl Act of 2018’’ or the ‘‘SNIFF Act’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2741 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 

2 TO INSPECT CERTAIN SUSPICIOUS PACK3 AGES. 

4 Section 404 of title 39, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(f) AUTHORITY TO INSPECT CERTAIN SUSPICIOUS

7 PACKAGES.— 

8 ‘‘(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection— 

9 ‘‘(A) the term ‘covered package’ means a 

10 package that— 

11 ‘‘(i) originated outside the United 

12 States; and 

13 ‘‘(ii) is addressed to a location within 

14 the United States; 

15 ‘‘(B) the term ‘qualified employee’ means 

16 an employee of the Postal Service who has been 

17 properly trained to inspect the contents of cov18 ered packages; and 

19 ‘‘(C) the term ‘United States’ includes any 

20 territory or possession of the United States. 

21 ‘‘(2) AUTHORITY.— 

22 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in 

23 subparagraph (B), and notwithstanding sub24 section (c), if a qualified employee acting in his 

25 or her official capacity at an international serv26 ice center that processes inbound international 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2741 IS

1 mail has probable cause to believe that a cov2 ered package contains illicit materials, including 

3 matter that is nonmailable under section 3001, 

4 the employee shall, without obtaining a search 

5 warrant, inspect the contents of the covered 

6 package. 

7 ‘‘(B) SAFETY EXCEPTION.—The require8 ment under subparagraph (A) shall not apply 

9 with respect to a covered package if a qualified 

10 employee believes that inspecting the contents 

11 of the covered package would pose a risk of per12 sonal injury to the employee or other individ13 uals. 

14 ‘‘(3) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in 

15 paragraph (2) shall be construed to authorize— 

16 ‘‘(A) any employee of the Postal Service to 

17 inspect a covered package, after the package 

18 has entered the domestic distribution network, 

19 without obtaining a search warrant; or 

20 ‘‘(B) any person to read correspondence 

21 contained in a covered package without obtain22 ing a search warrant.’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit31.1**

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, Javier O. Lamoso, President of ClearComm,L.P., certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed thisquarterly report of ClearComm, L.P.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)          Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)          Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: February 22, 2005

 
|   |   | /s/ Javier O. Lamoso    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Javier O. Lamoso        |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

 

----
#### POPE et al. v. STATE et al.

No. 2717.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

Sept. 29, 1932.

Opinion Granting Issuance of Mandate Feb. 2, 1933.

H. S. Bonham, of Corpus Christi, for plaintiffs in error.

A. M. Turney, Co. Atty., of Alpine, for defendants in error.

PEDPHREY, C. J.

This cause was appealed from the district court of Brewster county, Tex. The judgment appealed from was in favor of the state of Texas, for §1,725.91, taxes, penalties, and interest due the state of Texas, and the county of Brewster, on certain lands in Brewster county, for the years 1921, 1923, and 1925.

The judgment of the trial court was reversed by this court and the cause remanded to the trial court. 53 S.W.(2d) 332. Under the general rule, the costs were adjudged against defendant in error.

• Thereafter the county attorney of Brewster county requested the clerk to issue the mandate, which he declined to do under article 1865, Revised Statutes.

Defendant in error has now filed its motion for an order requiring the clerk to issue the mandate.

The basis of the motion is that the state is not liable for costs. The motion is contested by plaintiffs in error.

We find the rule, as laid down in Corpus Juris, as to the liability of the state for costs, to be: “While the state may be excused from the payment of costs because of express statutory exemption, it is a general and well established rule, apart from statute, that costs are not recoverable from a state, in her own courts, whether she has brought suit as plaintiff or has properly been sued as defendant; or whether she is successful or defeated.” 59 C. J. § 503, p. 332. We find the same rule announced in 25 R. C. L. § 55, p. 418.

After a diligent search, we have found no statute in our state whereby the state is made liable for costs, and therefore we conclude that the defendant in error was not liable for the costs in the case at bar and *493that such costs were improperly taxed against it.

This being true, it follows that the mandate should issue without the payment of costs and that article 1865 will not apply in this case.

It is therefore ordered that the clerk issue the mandate as prayed for by defendant in error. ,
```

CONFIRMING STATEMENT

    This statement confirms that the undersigned, Mark K. Hardwick, has authorized and designated, Jennifer Mainord, Amanda C. Williams or Rhonda Bost, to execute and file on the undersignedTMs behalf, all Form 3, 4, and 5 (including amendments thereto) that the undersigned may be required to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a result of the undersignedTMs ownership of or transactions in securities of First Merchants Corporation.  The authority of Jennifer Mainord, Amanda C. Williams or Rhonda Bost under this statement shall continue until the undersigned is no longer required to file Form 3, 4, and 5 with regard to the undersigned ownership or transactions in securities of First Merchants Corporation, unless earlier revoked in writing.  The undersigned acknowledges Jennifer Mainord, Amanda C. Williams or Rhonda Bost are not assuming any of the undersignedTMs responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                        __/s/ Mark K. Hardwick______
                        Mark K. Hardwick

Date: February 13, 2014
```
Exhibit 4.36

                        AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE WARRANT

       This  Amendment  No. 1, dated as of August 19, 2002 (this "Amendment No.
1"), is to the Warrant, dated  as  of  July  30,  2002, (the "Warrant") between
Molecular Diagnostics, Inc., a Delaware corporation  (the  "Company"),  and the
holders of the Warrants (the "Investors").

                                  WITNESSETH:

       WHEREAS,  the  Investors  purchased  the  Warrants  in connection with a
bridge financing that closed June 30, 2002;

       WHEREAS, the Investors have agreed to amend the maturity date of certain
Promissory Notes purchased in the bridge financing; and

       WHEREAS, pursuant to and in compliance with the provisions of Section 21
of the Warrants, the Company and the Investors desire to amend  the Warrants as
hereinafter set forth.

       NOW,  THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and agreements  herein
contained, the Company and the Investors agree as follows:

       1.    The  Exercise  Price  of  the  Warrants is adjusted from $0.65 per
share to $0.25 per share.

       2.    Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings given
them in the Warrants.

       3.    This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in any number of counterparts
and  each  of  such counterparts shall for all purposes  be  deemed  to  be  an
original, and all  such  counterparts shall together constitute but one and the
same instrument.



<PAGE>


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment No. 1 to be duly
executed and attested as of the ____ day of August, 2002.


                                        MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, INC.


                                        By:   _________________________________
                                              Name:  Peter P. Gombrich
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                                     and President



                                 INVESTOR:



                                        By:   _________________________________
Record of Discussion Docket No.



# FAA- **}()/~** "") 

# i 

# '-{I 2_ O!C/.-- !1JM- 

### Q 

# Y :l

,..A-]) Directorate Identifier: -AD 

# IWith whom outside the FAA bas this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

### . manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, 

### etc)?

**~--~----~ --~------------------------~**  ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

### Airlines 4 America 

### R. Ireland 10/28/2014 Other. List below.

**··----h~·-·----** !---· ----· - 

### ------·-·--------- ------------

**~------·-···-··------------·--**

Other /Additional information: 

### Alerted A4A that FAA is considering mandating relevant SB 

### actions. DO NOT DELE TE PAGE BREAK
EXHIBIT  99.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
          ------------------------------------------------------------

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Vince  Vellardita,  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  ValCom,  Inc.  (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

(1)  the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended  December  31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section  13  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or  78o(d));  and

(2)  the  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March  15,  2005
               /s/  Vince  Vellardita
               ----------------------
               Name:  Vince  Vellardita
              Title:  Chief  Executive  Officer


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
          ------------------------------------------------------------

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I,  Tracey  Eland,  the Secretary (principal accounting officer) of ValCom, Inc.
(the  "Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

(1)  the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended  December  31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section  13  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or  78o(d));  and

(2)  the  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  :  March  15,  2005

               /s/Tracey  Eland
               ----------------
               Name:  Tracey  Eland
               Title:  Controller  (Principal  Accounting  Officer)

<PAGE>
# C_2022233EN.01003001.xml

| 16.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/30

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 233/07)

Decision granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2022) 3685 | 9 June 2022 | Chromium trioxide
  EC No. 215-607-8, CAS No. 1333-82-0 | Safran Aircraft Engines, 2, boulevard du Général-Martial-Valin, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France | REACH/22/25/0 | Industrial use of chromium trioxide-based mixtures for the surface treatment of legacy spare parts of military aircraft engines, including safety-critical parts whose failure endangers airworthiness | 31 December 2029 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2022) 3685

9 June 2022

Chromium trioxide

EC No. 215-607-8, CAS No. 1333-82-0

Safran Aircraft Engines, 2, boulevard du Général-Martial-Valin, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France

REACH/22/25/0

Industrial use of chromium trioxide-based mixtures for the surface treatment of legacy spare parts of military aircraft engines, including safety-critical parts whose failure endangers airworthiness

31 December 2029

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
SCPIE Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                   |  | 
|Dated: May 9, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald J. Zuk      
|                   |  |  |  | Donald J. Zuk          
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





---



Certification of Chief
Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of SCPIE Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                   |  | 
|Dated: May 9, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert B. Tschudy  
|                   |  |  |  | Robert B. Tschudy      
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.