alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

DOMINIQUE TISINGER, 

Defendant BelowAppellant, 

v. 

STATE OF DELAWARE, 

Plaintiff BelowAppellee. 

§ 

§ 

§ No. 568, 2016 

§ 

§ 

§ Court Below—Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ Cr. ID 1510007181 

§ 

§ 

 Submitted: March 15, 2017 

 Decided: April 20, 2017 

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices. 

ORDER

This 20th day of April 2017, it appears to the Court that: 

(1) On November 29, 2016, the Court received appellant Dominique 

Tisinger’s notice of appeal from a Superior Court order dated October 7, 2016. 

The Superior Court’s order sentenced Tisinger on several criminal convictions and 

a violation of probation following his guilty plea. Under Supreme Court Rule 

6(a)(iii), a timely notice of appeal should have been filed on or before November 7, 

2016. 

(2) The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Tisinger to show 

cause why his appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. Tisinger filed a 

response on December 9, 2016. He contends that his notice of appeal was 
2

untimely because: (i) his appointed counsel failed to respond to his requests about 

filing an appeal; (ii) he did not have access to the law library to find out the rules 

for filing an appeal; and (iii) he thought that he had ninety days to file his appeal. 

(3) The Court requested Tisinger’s court-appointed counsel to reply to 

Tisinger’s response. After an extension, the Court received counsel’s reply on 

March 15, 2017. Counsel asserts that that she had discussed the appeal process 

with Tisinger the day before he was sentenced and informed him of the 30 day 

appeal period. Tisinger did not request counsel to file an appeal and did not 

contact her after his sentencing to inquire about an appeal. 

(4) Time is a jurisdictional requirement.1

 A notice of appeal must be 

received by the Office of the Clerk of this Court within the applicable time period 

in order to be effective.2 This Court cannot consider an untimely appeal unless an 

appellant can demonstrate that the failure to file a timely notice of appeal is 

attributable to court-related personnel.3 Tisinger has not made such a showing in 

this case. Thus, the Court concludes that his appeal must be dismissed. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.

Justice 

 

1Carr v. State, 554 A.2d 778, 779 (Del.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 829 (1989). 

2Del. Supr. Ct. R. 10(a). 

3

Bey v. State, 402 A.2d 362, 363 (Del. 1979).
#### W. Edd BROWN, Appellant, v. Owen M. MURRAY, Receiver, Appellee.

No. 11616.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.

Dec. 2, 1933.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 6, 1934.

H. D. Payne, of Floydada, for appellant.

John W. Pope, Sr., Lynn B. Milam, and Pat J. Howe, all of Dallas, for appellee.

BOND, Justice.

This record discloses an analogous situation to that in the case of J. T. Kirk, appellant, v. Owen M. Murray, Receiver, Appellee, 67 S.W.(2d) 385, this day decided by this court, involving paving certificates of the same series issued by the same municipality, in which we held that the receiver’s cause of action is amenable to the venue statutes of this state (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 1995), and the conclusion therein reached is applicable to the contentions here raised. On the strength of our holding in the above-cited case, the judgment of the lower court is reversed and remanded, appellant’s plea of privilege is sustained, and the suit transferred to the district court of Floyd county, in accordance with the relating statutes.

Reversed and remanded, with instructions.
NO. 07-03-0488-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	JANUARY 13, 2004

	______________________________

	MIKE SMITH D/B/A COUNTY LINE ENTERPRISES

	AND COUNTY LINE ENTERPRISES, INC.	

			Appellant

	v.

	WILBERT KALBAS

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 287TH DISTRICT COURT OF BAILEY COUNTY;

	NO. 7683; HON. GORDON H. GREEN, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

	Appellant Mike Smith d/b/a County Line Enterprises and County Line Enterprises, Inc. filed a notice of appeal on November 18, 2003.  According to the pertinent district clerk, appellant did not submit a written designation for the record or pay or make arrangements to pay for the record under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2).1  Nor did he file an affidavit of indigence per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1.  By letter from this Court dated December 30, 2003, we informed counsel for appellant that “unless appellant files proof with this court by January 9, 2004, that this requirement (arrangements for payment of the record) has been satisfied . . . the cause will be dismissed for want of prosecution . . . .”  Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  The deadline lapsed, and the proof required was not received. 

	Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c). 

							Per Curiam
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF APPELLATE COUNSEL

FOR APPELLEE CHRISTUS ST. MICHAEL HEALTH SYSTEM PAGE 1

D/934077V1

NO. 06-15-00068-CV

IN THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

AT TEXARKANA, TEXAS

DONAL TURNER,

Appellant,

v.

CHRISTUS ST. MICHAEL HEALTH SYSTEM,

Appellee.

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court of Bowie County, Texas

Cause No. 15C0448-102

(Hon. Bobby Lockhart)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF APPELLATE COUNSEL FOR

APPELLEE CHRISTUS ST. MICHAEL HEALTH SYSTEM

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES

OF THE DALLAS COURT OF APPEALS:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, pursuant to rule 6.2 of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure, that Michelle E. Robberson of the law firm Cooper & Scully,

P.C. will serve as lead appellate counsel for Appellee, CHRISTUS St. Michael

Health System, in the above-styled appeal, in addition to Appellee’s trial counsel,

Cory M. Sutker of Cooper & Scully, P.C.

ACCEPTED

06-15-00068-CV

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

9/24/2015 4:25:29 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 9/24/2015 4:25:29 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF APPELLATE COUNSEL

FOR APPELLEE CHRISTUS ST. MICHAEL HEALTH SYSTEM PAGE 2

D/934077V1

Contact information for Appellee’s lead appellate counsel is:

Michelle E. Robberson

Texas Bar No. 16982900

Cooper & Scully, P.C.

900 Jackson Street, Suite 100

Dallas, Texas 75202

(214) 712-9500

(214) 712-9540 (fax)

michelle.robberson@cooperscully.com

Ms. Robberson requests the Court and opposing counsel add her to the list of

counsel in this case who will receive notice of all pleadings, notices, orders, and

other communications from the Court and from opposing counsel.

Respectfully submitted,

COOPER & SCULLY, P.C.

By: /s/ Michelle E. Robberson

MICHELLE E. ROBBERSON

Texas State Bar No. 16982900

michelle.robberson@cooperscully.com

CORY M. SUTKER

Texas Bar No. 24037569

cory.sutker@cooperscully.com

900 Jackson Street, Suite 100

Dallas, Texas 75202

Telephone: 214.712.9500

Facsimile: 214.712.9540

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

CHRISTUS ST. MICHAEL HEALTH

SYSTEM
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF APPELLATE COUNSEL

FOR APPELLEE CHRISTUS ST. MICHAEL HEALTH SYSTEM PAGE 3

D/934077V1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I served a true and correct copy of this Notice on the

counsel of record listed below via e-filing on this 24th day of September, 2015:

Michael L. Bernoudy, Jr.

THE BERNOUDY LAW FIRM

2400 W. Grand Avenue

Marshall, TX 75670

/s/ Michelle E. Robberson _____________

MICHELLE E. ROBBERSON
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [245A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the extension of the Class III gaming compact between the Alturas Indian Rancheria and the State of California.

# DATES:

The extension takes effect on September 20, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240,                         *IndianGaming@bia.gov;*                         (202) 219-4066.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

An extension to an existing Tribal-State Class III gaming compact does not require approval by the Secretary if the extension does not modify any other terms of the compact. 25 CFR 293.5. The Alturas Indian Rancheria and the State of California have reached an agreement to extend the expiration date of their existing Tribal-State Class III gaming compact to December 31, 2024. This publication provides notice of the new expiration date of the compact.

Bryan Newland,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2024-21562 Filed 9-19-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of

State of Connecticut

Department of Mental Health

and Addiction Services

TRADING AGREEMENt-AND

ORDERNO 8101 MODIFICATION

TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDER MODIFICATION

In the maner of a Trading Agreement and Order between the Commissioner of Environmema!

Protection ("Commissioner") and the Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health and

Addiction Services ("DMHAS").

\VHEREAS, the Commissioner and DMHAS, having agreed to the terms and conditions

set forth in Trading Agreement and Order No.8 Jal issued on July 16, 1996, do now, by mutual

agreement, modify paragraphs C.l., C.1.E., C.3. and C.I0. as follows:

1. Change the second date specified in paragraph C.1. from May 1, 1999 to

May 1,2003.

2. Replace paragraph C.I.E. as follows: No later than March I of the years 1999,

2000, 200l, 2002, 2003 and 2004, include with its alUluaJ emissions repon to the

Commissioner, NOx emissions and ERCs used for the previous calendar year, in

monthly increments;

3. Change the date specified in paragraph C.3. from May 1, 1999 to May 1,2003.

4. Change the date specified in parograph C.IO. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003.

All other terms and conditions of Tra~ing Agreement and Order No. 810 I issued by the

Commissioner acting under Sections 22a-6, 22a* 171, 22a-174, 22a* 176, 22a-177 and 22a-178 of

the Connecticut General Statutes shall remain in effect.

Initials:~ (Printe~ on Recyclcd P.per)

79 Elm SHeet • !fmford, CT 06J06 - 5127

hnp:/idep.SUle.C1.IIS

An Equl'! Opporrullity Emp!oyu

Date~J
State of Connecticut

Department of Mental Health

and Addiction Services

2 TRADfNG AGREEMENT

AND ORDER NO. 8101

MODIFICATION

~.

The State of Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services hereby consents to

the entry of this modification to the Trading Agreement and Order without further notice.

The State of Connecticut Department of Mental Health

and Addiction Services

Signature:

Type Name;

Type Title;

Date:

Albert J. Solnit, M.D.

Commissioner. Stale ofConnectjcut.

Department gfPublic Health and

Addiction Services

___·~.=..I f2(9)

1999.

Entered as a modification of an Order ofthe Commissioner of Environmental Protection numbered

8101 this __",,20 9_._dayof

hur 1. Rocque, Jr.

ommlSSloner

TOWN OF MIDDLETOWN

LAND RECORDS

MAILED CERTIFIED MAIL,

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Certified Document No.
#### DUVALL et ux. v. KANSAS CITY LIFE INS. CO. et al.

No. 1754.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Sept. 24, 1936.

W. V. Dunnam, of Waco, for appellants W. H. Duvall and wife.

Hamilton, Lipscomb & Wood, of Dallas, for appellee Kansas City Life Ins. Co.

GALLAGHER, Chief Justice.

Both appellants, W. H. Duvall and wife, and appellee, Kansas City Life Insurance Company, have filed motions for rehearing herein.

. This court, at a prior day of this term, in general terms, reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the cause for another trial.

Appellee, Kansas City Life Insurance. Company, in its cross-action, alleged that appellants Duvall and wife had theretofore, on the 12th day of September, 1930, executed and delivered to it a'deed of trust, duly recorded in vol. 5, page 309 of the Deed of Trust Records of Bosque county, on a certain 191⁄2 acres of land situated in said county and described in said deed of trust by metes and bounds, to further secure the indebtedness sued on by it herein. Appellants claimed that, said 191⁄2 acres of land described in said deed of trust was at the time the same was executed a part of their homestead, and that the lien attempted to be created by the same was wholly void and unenforceable. Appellants and said appellee, at the trial of this cause, filed a written stipulation reciting that the land described in said deed of trust was at the time 'of the execution of the same a portion of appellants’ . homestead, and agreeing that the same might be canceled as a cloud upon appellants’ title thereto. The court, in his judgment rendered in this cause, found as a fact that at the time of the execution of said deed of trust the land described therein was a part of the homestead of appellants, and that such instrument was from its inception void and of no effect and constituted a cloud upon appellants’ title to said land. Appellee Kansas City Life Insurance Company filed no cross-assignments of error and has in no way attacked the validity of the judgment cancelling said purported lien. Such judgment of' cancellation is therefore affirmed. The order of this court reversing the remainder of the judgment of the trial court and remanding the issues involved therein to the district court for another trial is not disturbed, and with such exception, both said motion's for rehearing are-overruled.
#### ALPHA PETROLEUM COMPANY, Relator, v. Hon. Daniel WALKER et al., Respondents.

No. 1629-6361.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.

Feb. 13, 1933.

Wm. N. Bonner and V. Childress, both of Wichita Falls, and John T. Garrison, Paul D. Page, Jr., William F. Grimes, Lawrence Lip-per, and Sewell, Taylor, Morris & Garwood, all of Houston, for relator.

James Y. Allred, Atty. Gen., and Maurice Cheek, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.

CRITZ, J.

This is an original application for mandamus and writ of prohibition filed in the Supreme Court by Alpha Petroleum Company, a corporation, against the members of the Court of Civil Appeals for the Ninth District at Beaumont, the Texas Railroad Commission, and the Texas Pipe Line Company, a corporation. The matters here involved relate to and grew out of the issues involved in Alpha Petroleum Company v. C. V. Terrell et al., 59 S.W.(2d) 364, this day decided by this section of the commission. The opinion in that ease disposed of all pertinent questions in this case.

We recommend that all orders heretofore made in this cause by the Supreme Court be vacated and annulled, and that the mandamus and writ of prohibition here prayed for be denied.

CURETON, C. J.

The opinion of the Commission of Appeals is adopted as the opinion of the Supreme Court, and all orders heretofore made in this cause by the Supreme Court are hereby vacated and, annulled, and the mandamus and writ of prohibition herein prayed for refused, as recommended by the Commission of Appeals.
# C_2022336EN.01004001.xml

| 2.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/40

---

P9_TA(2022)0005

Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Jorg Kristijan Petrovič

European Parliament decision of 20 January 2022 on the nomination of Jorg Kristijan Petrovič as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C9-0408/2021 — 2021/0805(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2022/C 336/09)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0408/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0408/2021),

| — | having regard to Rule 129 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 129 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0005/2022), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0005/2022),

| A. | whereas, by letter of 5 November 2021, the Council consulted Parliament on the nomination of Jorg Kristijan Petrovič as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas, by letter of 5 November 2021, the Council consulted Parliament on the nomination of Jorg Kristijan Petrovič as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

| B. | whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control then proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

B.

whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control then proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| C. | whereas the committee subsequently held a hearing with the nominee on 10 January 2022, at which the nominee made an opening statement and then answered questions put by the members of the committee; |
| --- | --- |

C.

whereas the committee subsequently held a hearing with the nominee on 10 January 2022, at which the nominee made an opening statement and then answered questions put by the members of the committee;

| 1. | Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Jorg Kristijan Petrovič as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
**Exhibit      32(b)**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company,                Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Thomas A. Nardi          |   | December                29, 2006 |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                                        |   | Date                             |
| Thomas                A. Nardi              |   |                             |
| Executive                Vice President and |   |                             |
| Chief                Financial Officer of   |   |                             |
| Peoples                Energy Corporation   |   |                             |

| /s/                Thomas A. Nardi                    |   | December                29, 2006 |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                                                  |   | Date                             |
| Thomas                A. Nardi                        |   |                             |
| Executive                Vice President and           |   |                             |
| Chief                Financial Officer of             |   |                             |
| The                Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company |   |                             |

| /s/                Thomas A. Nardi          |   | December                29, 2006 |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                                        |   | Date                             |
| Thomas                A. Nardi              |   |                             |
| Executive                Vice President and |   |                             |
| Chief                Financial Officer of   |   |                             |
| North                Shore Gas Company      |   |                             |
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21311]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 298 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-618, CP2024-626.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21311 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 55 ) ll-K - (B ) -4 3 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:49 AM Sheet 55of 325P. 2 

# -2 7 II-K-(B)-4 3

REVISION S T O S0 2 AN DPM CONTRO L COSTS . Lette r fro

m M . Kelly , Radia nt o E . Medine , EEA . Jul y 17 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUNDI

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-4 3