Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2024 / Notices 76873 

1See Docket No. RM2018–3, Order Adopting 

Final Rules Relating to Non-Public Information, 

June 27, 2018, Attachment A at 19–22 (Order No. 

4679). 

demonstration and operations program 

would not significantly affect the 

quality of human environment. No 

significant radiological or nonradiological impacts are expected from 

the proposed action. Therefore, the NRC 

staff has determined that, pursuant to 10 

CFR 51.31, ‘‘Determinations based on 

environmental assessment,’’ preparation 

of an EIS is not required for the 

proposed action, and pursuant to 10 

CFR 51.32, ‘‘Finding of no significant 

impact,’’ a FONSI is appropriate. In 

accordance with 10 CFR 51.32(a)(4), this 

FONSI incorporates the EA summarized 

in this notice by reference. 

IV. Availability of Documents 

The documents identified in the 

following table are available to 

interested persons through ADAMS. 

Document description ADAMS 

accession No. 

EA for a proposed increase in production of HALEU at the American Centrifuge Plant in Piketon, Ohio, August 2024 ............ ML24254A206 

ACO’s application for amendment to increase its licensed material possession limits to support increased HALEU production, February 13, 2023 .............................................................................................................................................................. ML23047A046 

Supplement to ACO’s application, June 29, 2023 ........................................................................................................................ ML23187A143 

Supplement to ACO’s application, February 15, 2024 .................................................................................................................. ML24054A033 

Supplement to ACO’s application, March 7, 2024 ........................................................................................................................ ML24072A046 

EA for the approval of the HALEU demonstration program, June 2021 ...................................................................................... ML21085A705 

Email transmitting the draft EA for increased HALEU production to Ohio agencies, June 27, 2024 .......................................... ML24194A182 

Email to EPA Region 5 transmitting the draft EA for increased HALEU production, July 5, 2024 .............................................. ML24194A185 

Email to Ohio State Historic Preservation Office re: courtesy notification of NRC review of ACO’s license amendment request, July 5, 2024 ..................................................................................................................................................................... ML24194A181 

Dated: September 13, 2024. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

John Moses, 

Deputy Director, Division of Rulemaking, 

Environmental, and Financial Support, Office 

of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. 

[FR Doc. 2024–21276 Filed 9–18–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. MC2024–676 and CP2024–685; 

MC2024–677 and CP2024–686; MC2024–678 

and CP2024–687; MC2024–679 and CP2024– 

688; MC2024–680 and CP2024–689; 

MC2024–681 and CP2024–690; MC2024–682 

and CP2024–691; MC2024–683 and CP2024– 

692] 

New Postal Products 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recent Postal Service filing for the 

Commission’s consideration concerning 

a negotiated service agreement. This 

notice informs the public of the filing, 

invites public comment, and takes other 

administrative steps. 

DATES: Comments are due: September 

23, 2024. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http://

www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit 

comments electronically should contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section by 

telephone for advice on filing 

alternatives. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 

202–789–6820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Docketed Proceeding(s) 

I. Introduction 

The Commission gives notice that the 

Postal Service filed request(s) for the 

Commission to consider matters related 

to negotiated service agreement(s). The 

request(s) may propose the addition or 

removal of a negotiated service 

agreement from the Market Dominant or 

the Competitive product list, or the 

modification of an existing product 

currently appearing on the Market 

Dominant or the Competitive product 

list. 

Section II identifies the docket 

number(s) associated with each Postal 

Service request, the title of each Postal 

Service request, the request’s acceptance 

date, and the authority cited by the 

Postal Service for each request. For each 

request, the Commission appoints an 

officer of the Commission to represent 

the interests of the general public in the 

proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505 

(Public Representative). Section II also 

establishes comment deadline(s) 

pertaining to each request. 

The public portions of the Postal 

Service’s request(s) can be accessed via 

the Commission’s website (http://

www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of 

the Postal Service’s request(s), if any, 

can be accessed through compliance 

with the requirements of 39 CFR 

3011.301.1

The Commission invites comments on 

whether the Postal Service’s request(s) 

in the captioned docket(s) are consistent 

with the policies of title 39. For 

request(s) that the Postal Service states 

concern Market Dominant product(s), 

applicable statutory and regulatory 

requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39 

U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3030, and 39 

CFR part 3040, subpart B. For request(s) 

that the Postal Service states concern 

Competitive product(s), applicable 

statutory and regulatory requirements 

include 39 U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633, 

39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3035, and 

39 CFR part 3040, subpart B. Comment 

deadline(s) for each request appear in 

section II. 

II. Docketed Proceeding(s) 

1. Docket No(s).: MC2024–676 and 

CP2024–685; Filing Title: USPS Request 

to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority 

Mail & USPS Ground Advantage 

Contract 334 to Competitive Product 

List and Notice of Filing Materials 

Under Seal; Filing Acceptance Date: 

September 13, 2024; Filing Authority: 39 

U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 3040.130 through 

3040.135, and 39 CFR 3035.105; Public 

Representative: Jennaca D. Upperman; 

Comments Due: September 23, 2024. 

2. Docket No(s).: MC2024–677 and 

CP2024–686; Filing Title: USPS Request 

to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground 

Advantage Contract 348 to Competitive 

Product List and Notice of Filing 

Materials Under Seal; Filing Acceptance 

Date: September 13, 2024; Filing 

Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 

3040.130 through 3040.135, and 39 CFR 

3035.105; Public Representative: 

Jennaca D. Upperman; Comments Due: 

September 23, 2024. 

3. Docket No(s).: MC2024–678 and 

CP2024–687; Filing Title: USPS Request 

to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority 

Mail & USPS Ground Advantage 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
76874 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2024 / Notices 

1Complaint regarding blind mail, June 17, 2024 

(Complaint). In its motion to dismiss, the Postal 

Service asserts that because complaints must only 

be brought on the part of interested persons and 

because the Complaint fails to identify the nature 

of ‘‘Fiat Fiendum, Inc.,’’ the Complaint should be 

dismissed as it relates to that party. United States 

Postal Service’s Motion to Dismiss, July 8, 2024, at 

1 n.1 (Motion to Dismiss). As the resolution of this 

issue has no impact on the disposition of the 

Complaint, the Commission will decline to reach 

the merits of this question. 

2See Motion for summary elevation, or extension 

and contingent withdrawal, and clarification, July 

12, 2024, at 5–9 (Motion for Extension). In addition 

to the seeking an extension, Complainants 

requested: (1) ‘‘summary elevation to a full 

proceeding under § 3022.30(a)(1) & Part 3010 

Subpart F[;]’’ (2) conditional withdrawal of the 

Complaint should Complainants fail to file an 

opposition to the Motion to Dismiss; and (3) 

clarification of which rules apply to Commission 

proceedings. See Motion for Extension at 4, 9, 10– 

12. The Commission denies these requests as moot. 

3See Notice re opposition to motion to dismiss, 

August 5, 2024 (Opposition). Both parties also filed 

a number of other documents not directly relevant 

to the issues in question here. 

Contract 335 to Competitive Product 

List and Notice of Filing Materials 

Under Seal; Filing Acceptance Date: 

September 13, 2024; Filing Authority: 39 

U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 3040.130 through 

3040.135, and 39 CFR 3035.105; Public 

Representative: Jana Slovinska; 

Comments Due: September 23, 2024. 

4. Docket No(s).: MC2024–679 and 

CP2024–688; Filing Title: USPS Request 

to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority 

Mail & USPS Ground Advantage 

Contract 336 to Competitive Product 

List and Notice of Filing Materials 

Under Seal; Filing Acceptance Date: 

September 13, 2024; Filing Authority: 39 

U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 3040.130 through 

3040.135, and 39 CFR 3035.105; Public 

Representative: Arif Hafiz; Comments 

Due: September 23, 2024. 

5. Docket No(s).: MC2024–680 and 

CP2024–689; Filing Title: USPS Request 

to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority 

Mail & USPS Ground Advantage 

Contract 337 to Competitive Product 

List and Notice of Filing Materials 

Under Seal; Filing Acceptance Date: 

September 13, 2024; Filing Authority: 39 

U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 3040.130 through 

3040.135, and 39 CFR 3035.105; Public 

Representative: Christopher C. Mohr; 

Comments Due: September 23, 2024. 

6. Docket No(s).: MC2024–681 and 

CP2024–690; Filing Title: USPS Request 

to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority 

Mail & USPS Ground Advantage 

Contract 338 to Competitive Product 

List and Notice of Filing Materials 

Under Seal; Filing Acceptance Date: 

September 13, 2024; Filing Authority: 39 

U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 3040.130 through 

3040.135, and 39 CFR 3035.105; Public 

Representative: Almaroof Agoro; 

Comments Due: September 23, 2024. 

7. Docket No(s).: MC2024–682 and 

CP2024–691; Filing Title: USPS Request 

to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground 

Advantage Contract 349 to Competitive 

Product List and Notice of Filing 

Materials Under Seal; Filing Acceptance 

Date: September 13, 2024; Filing 

Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 

3040.130 through 3040.135, and 39 CFR 

3035.105; Public Representative: 

Samuel Robinson; Comments Due: 

September 23, 2024. 

8. Docket No(s).: MC2024–683 and 

CP2024–692; Filing Title: USPS Request 

to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority 

Mail & USPS Ground Advantage 

Contract 339 to Competitive Product 

List and Notice of Filing Materials 

Under Seal; Filing Acceptance Date: 

September 13, 2024; Filing Authority: 39 

U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 3040.130 through 

3040.135, and 39 CFR 3035.105; Public 

Representative: Gregory S. Stanton; 

Comments Due: September 23, 2024. 

This Notice will be published in the 

Federal Register. 

Erica A. Barker, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2024–21458 Filed 9–18–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket No. C2024–13; Order No. 7507] 

Complaint Proceeding 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is 

appointing a Presiding Officer to 

represent the interests of the general 

public and provide a public written 

intermediate decision including 

findings of fact and conclusions of law 

on the issues raised in this proceeding. 

ADDRESSES: Submit notices of 

intervention electronically via the 

Commission’s Filing Online system at 

http://www.prc.gov. Persons interested 

in intervening who cannot submit their 

views electronically should contact the 

person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, 

General Counsel, at 202–789–6820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Background 

III. Commission Analysis 

IV. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

On June 17, 2024, Sai and Fiat 

Fiendum, Inc. (Complainants) filed a 

complaint with the Commission 

regarding the Postal Service’s treatment 

of mail items for the blind (blind mail).1

On July 8, 2024, the Postal Service filed 

its Motion to Dismiss. In response, 

Complainants filed their ‘‘[m]otion for 

summary elevation, or extension and 

contingent withdrawal, and 

clarification,’’ requesting, amongst other 

relief, that the Commission extend the 

deadline to respond to the Motion to 

Dismiss.2 The Commission granted this 

extension. On August 5, 2024, 

Complainants filed their opposition.3

For the reasons explained below, the 

Commission concludes that the 

Complaint raises an issue of material 

fact as to whether the Postal Service has 

violated 39 U.S.C. 403(c) in its treatment 

of blind mail for international mailers. 

The Commission determines that 

Complainants’ remaining claims should 

be dismissed for a lack of jurisdiction 

due to Complainants’ failure to state a 

claim for which relief can be granted. 

II. Background 

Complainant Sai is a blind American 

citizen living in the United Kingdom 

who is the President of Fiat Fiendum, 

Inc., the other named Complainant. 

Complaint at 3. Complainants explain 

that the Universal Postal Convention 

(UPC), to which the United States is a 

party, mandates that the international 

mailing of certain items for the blind be 

free. Id. Complainants allege that the 

Postal Service has abdicated its 

responsibilities under the UPC by 

putting unlawful conditions on the free 

mailing of items for the blind, thus 

violating international law as well as 

human rights law, anti-discrimination 

statutes, and the U.S. Constitution. See, 

e.g., Complaint at 11–21. 

Complainants provide several 

examples of the manner in which the 

Postal Service is restricting the scope of 

free blind mail and describes how these 

restrictions harm blind mailers who, 

like them, need items shipped overseas. 

Complaint at 11–14. For instance, 

Complainants explain that a common 

item used by blind individuals is ‘‘a 

brailler—a specialized typewriter . . . 

that outputs braille embossing rather 

than ink.’’ Id. at 11. Complainants 

explain that this item is essential for 

blind individuals and is often only 

available from one U.S.-based company 

worldwide. Id. at 11–12. Complainants 

assert, however, that because of the size 

of these braillers, the Postal Service 

refuses to ship these items as free blind 

mail, in violation of UPC rules. Id. 

According to Complainants, ‘‘it is cost 

prohibitive to mail this internationally 

without blind mail,’’ particularly 

considering that blind people ‘‘are often 

quite poor’’ and cannot rely on 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1