alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
     PEM International, Ltd., incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, is 100% ownedby the Company.
     PEM International (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., incorporated under the laws of the State ofDelaware, is 100% owned by the Company.
     PEM Management, Inc., incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, is 100% owned bythe Company.
     PEM World Sales, Ltd., incorporated under the laws of Bermuda, is 100% owned by the Company.
     Arconix Group, Inc., incorporated under the laws of Delaware, is 100% owned by the Company.
     PEM Industries, Inc., incorporated under the laws of Delaware, is 100% owned by the Company.
     PennEngineering Holdings, Inc., incorporated under the laws of Delaware, is 100% owned by theCompany.
     INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
     Atlas Engineering, Inc., incorporated under the laws of Ohio, is 100% owned by PennEngineeringHoldings, Inc.
     Arconix/Singapore Pte. Ltd., incorporated under the laws of Delaware, is 100% owned byArconix Group, Inc.
     Arconix/U.K. Ltd., incorporated under the laws of Delaware, is 100% owned by Arconix Group,Inc.
     Arconix/USA Inc., incorporated under the laws of California, is 100% owned by Arconix Group,Inc.
     Arconix/Mexico, S. de R.L., incorporated under the laws of Mexico, is 99% owned by PEMIndustries, Inc. and 1% owned by Arconix Group, Inc.
 

 

     Arconix/Mexico Management S.A. de C.V., incorporated under the laws of Mexico, is 99.998%owned by PEM Industries, Inc. and .002% owned by Arconix Group, Inc.
     Arconix Fastening Distribution (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., incorporated under the laws of ThePeoples Republic of China, is 100% owned by PennEngineering Global Holdings SRL.
     PennEngineering Fastening Technologies (Europe) Ltd., incorporated under the laws of Ireland,is 100% owned by PennEngineering Holdings, Inc.
     PEM Fastening Systems/Europe Holdings Ltd., incorporated under the laws of Ireland, is 100%owned by PennEngineering Fastening Technologies (Europe) Ltd.
     PennEngineering Global Holdings SRL, incorporated under the laws of Barbados, WI, is 99.09%owned by PennEngineering Holdings, Inc., and 0.01% by Arconix Group, Inc.
     PennEngineering World Holdings L.P., a limited partnership formed under the laws of Bermuda,has as a General Partner, PennEngineering Holdings, Inc., and as a Limited Partner, Arconix Group,Inc.
     Maelux SA, incorporated under the laws of Luxembourg, is owned 100% by PennEngineering WorldHoldings L.P.
     PennEngineering Motion Technologies (Europe) SRL, incorporated under the laws of Italy, is100% owned by Maelux SA.
# C_2022093EN.01000901.xml

| 28.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/9

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9603 – SNCF MOBILITES / THIF)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 93/08)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | SNCF SA (‘SNCF’, France), |
| --- | --- |

—

SNCF SA (‘SNCF’, France),

| — | THI Factory (‘THIF’, Belgium). |
| --- | --- |

—

THI Factory (‘THIF’, Belgium).

SNCF will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole THIF.

The concentration is accomplished by way of contract or any other means.

2.

| — | SNCF is the incumbent French railway undertaking. Its activities include rail passenger and freight transport, station and infrastructure management and engineering activities. SNCF exercises sole control over Eurostar International Limited, the operator of international high-speed rail services connecting the United Kingdom with France, Belgium and the Netherlands through the Channel Tunnel between the United Kingdom and France, |
| --- | --- |

—

SNCF is the incumbent French railway undertaking. Its activities include rail passenger and freight transport, station and infrastructure management and engineering activities. SNCF exercises sole control over Eurostar International Limited, the operator of international high-speed rail services connecting the United Kingdom with France, Belgium and the Netherlands through the Channel Tunnel between the United Kingdom and France,

| — | THIF is a railway undertaking active in the management and operation of international high-speed rail passenger transport services between France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany under the name Thalys. |
| --- | --- |

—

THIF is a railway undertaking active in the management and operation of international high-speed rail passenger transport services between France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany under the name Thalys.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9603 – SNCF MOBILITES / THIF

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2698 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax 

on indoor tanning services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2015 

Mr. HOLDING (for himself, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. LONG, Mr. KNIGHT, 

Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. NUNES, Mr. LOUDERMILK, Mr. WESTMORELAND, 

Mr. ASHFORD, Mr. PETERSON, Mr. BENISHEK, Mr. WALBERG, and Mrs. 

BLACKBURN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the excise tax on indoor tanning services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tanning Tax Repeal 

5 Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON INDOOR TANNING 

7 SERVICES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle D of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking chapter 49 and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2698 IH

1 by striking the item relating to such chapter in the table 

2 of chapters of such subtitle. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to services performed after the 

5 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2022087EN.01001301.xml

| 23.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 87/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 87/13

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10325 – KRONOSPAN / PFLEIDERER POLSKA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 87/03)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Kronospan Holdings P.L.C (‘Kronospan’, Cyprus), |
| --- | --- |

—

Kronospan Holdings P.L.C (‘Kronospan’, Cyprus),

| — | Pfleiderer Polska sp. z.o.o (‘Pfleiderer Polska’, Poland), belonging to the Pfleiderer Group. |
| --- | --- |

—

Pfleiderer Polska sp. z.o.o (‘Pfleiderer Polska’, Poland), belonging to the Pfleiderer Group.

Kronospan will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Pfleiderer Polska.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Kronospan is a manufacturer and supplier of wood-based panels and their further processed value-added products. Namely, Kronospan manufactures and distributes raw and coated particle board (jointly referred to as PB), medium-density fibreboard (MDF), high-density fibreboard (HDF) including thin and lacquered HDF (T-HDF and L-HDF), worktops (post-forming elements/components, together Components), laminate flooring, decorative laminates, and oriented strand board, |
| --- | --- |

—

Kronospan is a manufacturer and supplier of wood-based panels and their further processed value-added products. Namely, Kronospan manufactures and distributes raw and coated particle board (jointly referred to as PB), medium-density fibreboard (MDF), high-density fibreboard (HDF) including thin and lacquered HDF (T-HDF and L-HDF), worktops (post-forming elements/components, together Components), laminate flooring, decorative laminates, and oriented strand board,

| — | Pfleiderer Polska is a manufacturer and supplier of a range of engineered wood and surface finished products, namely PB, T-HDF and L-HDF and Components. |
| --- | --- |

—

Pfleiderer Polska is a manufacturer and supplier of a range of engineered wood and surface finished products, namely PB, T-HDF and L-HDF and Components.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10325 – KRONOSPAN / PFLEIDERER POLSKA

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
Exhibit 23(a)

 

 

[ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP LETTERHEAD]

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report, dated October 26, 2001, (except with respect to the matter discussed in Note 19, as to which the date is December 11, 2001) included in this Form 10-K, into Peoples Energy Corporation's previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 2-82760, 33-6369, 333-17701, 33-63193 and 333-09993.
Exhibit 32.2 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of BarPoint.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey S.Benjamin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: August 14, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1286

ANDY ALEXANDER TJHANG,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A79-342-411)

Submitted: October 27, 2006 Decided: November 29, 2006

Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew W. Rau, LAW OFFICE OF MATTHEW W. RAU, Arlington, Virginia,

for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Allen

F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Andy Alexander Tjhang, a native and citizen of Indonesia,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider its prior order,

which adopted and affirmed the immigration judge’s denial of his

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under

the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and

the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its

discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(a) (2006); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir.

2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the

reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Tjhang, No. A79-342-411

(B.I.A. Feb. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE> 1
                                                     Exhibit 15
Letter Re:  Unaudited Interim Financial Information
___________________________________________________

Aetna Inc.
Hartford, Connecticut

Gentlemen:

Re:  Registration Statements No. 333-07167, 333-07169, 33-52819, 
33-52819-01, 333-08427, 333-08429 and 333-08431


With respect to the subject registration statements, we 
acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated 
May 5, 1997 related to our review of interim financial 
information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such 
report is not considered a part of a registration statement 
prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or 
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 
of the Act.




                             By   /s/  KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP  
                                 _____________________________
                                         (Signature)
                                       KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
May 5, 1997
08/19/201 0 15:4 3 FAX 202493514 2 FA A + DM S 21001/00 2



### =Tn

UNITE D STATE S O F AMERIC A

DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C , ^• ; 1 8 201 3

t»»»»Kn*******-mrk********** * I n th e Matte ro f Raymon d H
. Fessle r* FA A Docke t No. : CP10WP000 2 * DM S No. : FAA-2010-002 0 Respondent
. * FA A Region : Western-Pacifi c Judge : Richar d C
. Goodwi n

<H > «•••«««*•******* * ***4i*******»«n*Kirr****'**** ^

MOTION T O WITHDRA

W COMPLAINT WIT H PREJUDIC E To ; Th e Honorabl

e Richar dC
. Goodwi

n an dResponden

t throug h hi s attorney s herein : Th e Regional Counse l fo r th e Westem-Pacijfi c Region , Federal Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA ) throug h counsel , hereb y file s thi s Motio n for Withdrawal o f Complain t

an dseek s dismissa l o f

thi s actio n wit

h prejudice
. Thi s motio n i s base do n th e fac t tha t th e partie s hav e settle dthi s matter , an da n Orde r Assesssin g Civi l Penalt y reflectin g sai dsettlemen t

ha s been issued
. Respectfull y submitted , NAO M Regipna l XhristopHe

r Merril l Attorne y Dated : August

11,201 008/19/201 0 15:4 4 FA X 202493514 2 FA A* DM S 11002/00 2

CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t o n thi s dat e 1 hav e faxe dandplace din th e Unite dState s mail , postag e prepaid , acop y o f th e MOTIO N T O WITHDRA W COMPLAIN T WITH PREJUDIC E addresse da s follows :

Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wright Building—Roo m201 4 VIAFACSMILIE : (202)493-514 2 Th e Honorabl e RichardC
. Goodwi n Administrativ e La

w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo m541 1 U.S
. Dep£irtmcn

t o f Transportatio n 40 0 Sevent

h Street , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 0 VIA FACSIMILE : (202 ) 366-753 6
I fiirther certif y tha t o n thi s dal e I hav e faxe dan dplace di n th e Unite dState s mail , postag e prepaid , acop y o f th e MOTIO N T O WITHDRAW COMPLAIN T WIT H PREJUDICE , addresse da s follows :

Raymon dHerber

t Fessle r c/ o Eri c Seit7. , Esq
. 82 0 Mililan i Stree t Suit e 71 4 Honolulu , Hawai i 9681 3 VT A FACSIMILE : (808 ) 545-360 8 Dated : Augus t

11 , 201 0

Jef f Kamb^i?! ^ Legal Technici a Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Federal Aviatio n Administratio n Western-Pacifi c Regio n Hawthorne , Californi a
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 21.01
                                  -------------

                              List of Subsidiaries
                             of Pacific Enterprises
                             ----------------------

  Atlantic-Pacific Glendale, L.L.C.
  Argelec Holdco
  Arggas Holdco
  Arggen Holdco
  Argentina Gas & Electric Company
  Atlantic-Pacific Las Vegas, L.L.C.
  Bangor Gas Company, L.L.C.
  Bangor Pacific Corporation
  Central Plants, Inc.
  CES/Way Holding Company
  CES/Way International, Inc.
  EcoTrans OEM Corporation
  ElecArg Holdco
  Energy Alliance I
  Energy Pacific, LLC
  Energy Pacific Glendale
  Energy Pacific Las Vegas
  Ensource
  ESHold, Inc.
  Frontier Pacific
  Frontier Energy, L.L.C.
  FTM Sports Corporation
  GSHold, Inc.
  Mexico City Disco Holding, Ltd.
  Pacific Enerchange
  Pacific Energy Leasing
  Pacific Enterprises ABC Corporation
  Pacific Enterprises Commercial Loans, Inc.
  Pacific Enterprises Energy Management Services
  Pacific Enterprises Energy Services
  Pacific Enterprises International
  Pacific Enterprises International (Cayman I)
  Pacific Enterprises International (Cayman II)
  Pacific Enterprises International Argentina I
  Pacific Enterprises International Argentina II
  Pacific Enterprises International Brazil Holding I, Ltd.
  Pacific Enterprises International Brazil Holding II, Ltd.
  Pacific Enterprises International Holdings I
  Pacific Enterprises International Holdings II
  Pacific Enterprises International Indonesia
  Pacific Enterprises International Latin America
  Pacific Enterprises International Mexico I
  Pacific Enterprises International River Plate Holdings
  Pacific Enterprises International River Plate Operations
  Pacific Enterprises Leasing Company
  Pacific Enterprises LNG Company
  Pacific Enterprises Oil Company
  Pacific Enterprises Oil Company (USA)
  
<PAGE>
                   
  Pacific Enterprises Oil Company (Western)
  Pacific Interstate Company
  Pacific Interstate Mojave Company
  Pacific Interstate Offshore Company
  Pacific Interstate Transmission Company
  Pacific Interstate Transmission Company (Arctic)
  Pacific Lighting Corporation
  Pacific Lighting Gas Development Company
  Pacific Lighting Land Company
  Pacific Lighting Real Estate Group
  Pacific Offshore Pipeline Company
  Pacific Enterprises LNG Company
  Pacific Synthetic Fuel Company
  Pacific Western Resources Company
  Pay'n Save Drug Stores, Incorporated
  PEI Brazil Service Corporation
  PEI Mexico Service Corporation
  PEI Uruguay Holdings I, Ltd.
  PEI Uruguay Holdings II, Ltd.
  PEI Uruguay Operator I, Ltd.
  PEI Uruguay Operator II, Ltd.
  Presley RAC Finance Co., Inc.
  Presley-Home Mac Finance Co., Inc.
  Sempra
  Sempra Corporation
  Sempra Energy
  Sempra Energy Holding Co.
  Sempra Energy Trading
  Southern California Gas Company
  Southern California Gas Tower
  Rosarito PowerCo Holding, Ltd.
  Rosarito Transco Holding, Ltd.
  Toluca Disco Holding, Ltd.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-19-00397-CV

__________________

SIVA P. TAYI AND SUDHA TAYI, Appellants

V.

MONTGOMERY CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 284th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 18-07-09673-CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Siva P. Tayi and Sudha Tayi, filed a motion to dismiss their

appeal. In their motion, the Tayis state the parties have reached a settlement in the 

case they filed their notice to appeal. The Tayis moved to dismiss their appeal 

voluntarily and before this Court ruled on their appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1(a)(1). Additionally, no other party appealed from the final judgment the trial 

court rendered in the case. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
2

PER CURIAM

Submitted on December 9, 2020

Opinion Delivered December 10, 2020

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
# C_2022271EN.01001601.xml

| 14.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/16

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10747 – BHC / DUSSUR / BAKER PETROLITE SAUDI COMPANY JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 271/12)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Baker Hughes Company (‘BHC’) (USA), |
| --- | --- |

—

Baker Hughes Company (‘BHC’) (USA),

| — | Saudi Arabian Industrial Investments Company JSC (‘Dussur’), controlled by Saudi Aramco (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) and Saudi Arabian Public Investment Fund (‘PIF’), |
| --- | --- |

—

Saudi Arabian Industrial Investments Company JSC (‘Dussur’), controlled by Saudi Aramco (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) and Saudi Arabian Public Investment Fund (‘PIF’),

| — | Baker Petrolite Saudi Company Limited (‘Proposed JV’) (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia). |
| --- | --- |

—

Baker Petrolite Saudi Company Limited (‘Proposed JV’) (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia).

BHC and Dussur will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the Proposed JV.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

| — | BHC is the parent entity of an energy technology group of companies with a diverse portfolio of equipement and service capabilities that span the energy and industrial value chain operating in more than 120 countries, |
| --- | --- |

—

BHC is the parent entity of an energy technology group of companies with a diverse portfolio of equipement and service capabilities that span the energy and industrial value chain operating in more than 120 countries,

| — | Dussur is a strategic investment company. |
| --- | --- |

—

Dussur is a strategic investment company.

3.

The Proposed JV will be active in the specialty chemicals business in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

4.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

5.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10747 – BHC / DUSSUR / BAKER PETROLITE SAUDI COMPANY JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---