alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. ROBB & ROWLEY UNITED, Inc., et al.

No. 7389.

Supreme Court of Texas.

March 16, 1938.

Charles W. Procter, Co. Atty., of Palestine, for the State. "

J. D. Pickett, of Palestine, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This case is before this court on one certified question from the Court o.f Civil Appeals at Galveston. It appears from the certificate, and opinion accompanying it, that this cause was filed in the district court of Anderson county, Tex., by the State, by and through the county attorney of such county, against the above-named appellees, to enjoin them from operating and conducting “Buck Night.” It is alleged that the scheme or plan known as “Buck Night” is a lottery within the meaning of our penal statutes denouncing lotteries. The authority to bring the action is asserted by the county attorney under articles 4666 and 4667, R.C.S. of Texas 1925. The district court refused- the injunction, and the State appealed. On original hearing the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment of the district court. On rehearing the Court of Civil Appeals has certified to this court a question, which we will later indicate.

In its opinion, which accompanies the certificate, the Court of Civil Appeals seems to construe our opinion in the case of City of Wink v. Griffith Amusement Co., 100 S.W.2d 695, as holding that the plan or scheme there involved was not a lottery. We did not even attempt to decide that question in that case. We did decide that there was no statute giving a city the right to enjoin the operation of a lottery. We also decided that the Griffith Amusement Company was not entitled to an injunction against the city, because it was at least engaged in the operation of a scheme denounced by our Constitution as against the public policy of this State. Finally, there is absolutely no conflict between the opinion of this court in the City of Wink Case, supra, and that of the Court of Criminal Appeals in the case of Cole v. State, 112 S.W.2d 725.

With the record in the above condition, the Court of Civil Appeals has certified to this court the following question: “Did we err in our original opinio.n herein in holding that the State — in manner and form as brought by it — was not entitled to the temporary injunction it sought against the appellee herein under the cited statutes, R.S. Articles 4666 and 4667?”

The above question does not meet the requirements of article 1851, R.C.S. 1925. It certifies the entire case to this court for decision. The statute requires that in certifying questions to the Supreme Court a Court of Civil Appeals shall formulate questions of law to be answered by the Supreme Court. It is not permissible to simply ask the Supreme Court to decide *226the case. City of Fort Worth et al. v. Burnett et al., Tex.Sup., 112 S.W.2d 702, and authorities there cited.

The certificate is dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6765

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALFAYGO NIGHTENGALE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-98-17, CV-00-182)

Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: August 2, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfaygo Nightengale, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Alfaygo Nightengale seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Nightengale, Nos. CR-98-17; CV00-182 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          This legend contains summary financial information extracted from the 
financial statements for the nine months ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  679,570
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,036,108
<PP&E>                                         946,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                 214,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,928,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          853,703
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,612
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,484,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,928,718
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,830
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  779
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               219,914
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             20,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,897,659
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,897,659
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 129548 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129548 COA: 261996 Eaton CC: 02-020402-FC DANNY EUGENE DOWNING, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 10, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
January 6, 2012 

Mr. Jean-Pierre Harrison 

11835 Skyline Boulevard 

Los Gatos, CA 95033 

Dear Mr. Harrison: 

We have reviewed your letter dated July 6, 2011 resubmitting a petition for the amendment of 

Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) § 91.119(d). Specifically, you recommended 

“replacing (the term) helicopter with rotorcraft, thus extending the waiver of minimum 

altitude requirements to gyroplanes and gyrodynes.” Although your supporting 

documentation was taken into consideration, the regulatory guidelines of part 11 preclude the 

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) from taking any action at this time. 

As indicated in our response to you dated December 15, 2010, the FAA responds to petitions 

for rulemaking by following the guidelines set forth in part 11, specifically 

§ 11.73. As stated in that section, the FAA uses the following criteria when making a 

decision to amend current regulations based on a petition for rulemaking: 

1. The immediacy of the safety or security concerns the petition raises; 

2. The priority of other issues the FAA must deal with; and 

3. The resources we have available to address the issues. 

Broadening § 91.119(d) to include the aircraft category “rotorcraft” would not address an 

immediate safety or security concern. Additionally, your petition cannot be addressed 

because of other priorities and resource constraints. Therefore, we are unable to consider 

your petition at this time in accordance with § 11.73. Please keep in mind that your 

comments and arguments for a rule change will be consider in future rulemaking. 

Sincerely, 

John M. Allen 

Director, Flight Standards Service
Exhibit 3(f)   

 

 

 

BY-LAWS

 

OF

 

NORTH SHORE GAS COMPANY

 

 

 

 

AMENDED AUGUST 15, 2003   

 

NORTH SHORE GAS COMPANY

 

BY-LAWS

 

ARTICLE I
-
Offices
 
 
 
ARTICLE II
-
Meetings of Shareholders
 
 
 
ARTICLE III
-
Directors and Committees
 
 
 
ARTICLE IV
-
Officers
 
 
 
ARTICLE V
-
Indemnification of Directors,
Exhibit 99

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

 

FORM 11-K

 

 

[X]
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
 
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000

OR

[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
 
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission file number 2-82760

 

 

A.
Full title of the plan and address of the plan, if different from that of the issuer
 
named below:**Peoples Energy Corporation

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

 

B.
Name of issuer of the securities held pursuant to the plan and the address of its
 
principal executive office:
Peoples Energy Corporation

130 East Randolph Drive

Chicago, Illinois 60601

 

 

This Form 11-K is being filed for informational purposes only.

 

 

ITEM 1. An audited statement of financial condition as of the end of the latest two
 
fiscal years of the plan.
	Not applicable. Employees' payments for Company stock are neither segregated nor held for investment.

ITEM 2. An audited statement of income and changes in plan equity for each of the
 
latest three fiscal years of the plan.
	Not applicable. See above.

 

 

SIGNATURE

 

	Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Peoples Energy Corporation has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 

 
Peoples Energy Corporation
 
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
 
(Name of Plan)
 

Date: December 14, 2000
By /s/ James M. Luebbers
 
(Signature)
 
James M. Luebbers
 
Chief Financial Officer and Controller
 
Peoples Energy Corporation**
THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC.
                         2004 PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN
                                  ("the Plan")

                      FORM OF 2004 PLAN OPTION CERTIFICATE

          THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND SHOULD BE KEPT IN A SAFE PLACE
          -------------------------------------------------------------

THIS IS TO CERTIFY that, on the date shown below, the employee identified below
(the Grantee") has been granted an option award at the Exercise price stated
below to purchase the number of shares of Common Stock of The Interpublic Group
of Companies, Inc. specified below, subject to the rules of the above-mentioned
Plan.

Grantee:

Date of Grant:

Number of shares of Common Stock Subject to the Option:

Exercise Price per share:  $

Option Expiration Date:

[Vesting provisions to be inserted. Except as set forth in the Plan, the Option
may not be exercised during the twelve-month period following the Date of
Grant.]




                                                ------------------------------


The foregoing Grant of an Option Award is hereby accepted on the terms contained
herein:



---------------------------------
           Grantee
#### ROBERTSON v. STATE.

No. 18403.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 29, 1936.

Wade & Wade, of Beeville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of robbery, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

We find in the record an affidavit in due form made by the sheriff of Bee county certifying that, pending appeal, the appellant made his escape and is still at large. Under the provisions of our law, this court is without further jurisdiction in such case, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appekls has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SAID FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,728,215
<SECURITIES>                                 5,291,379
<RECEIVABLES>                                  312,486
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,820,434
<PP&E>                                       1,341,228
<DEPRECIATION>                                 741,852
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,311,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,237,206
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,073,931
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,311,189
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,095,266
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,865,745
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,770,479)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,770,479)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,770,479)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (343.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LoyaltyPoint, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Paul Robinson, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/  Paul Robinson
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   Paul Robinson,
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 16, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESExhibit 24.1-POWER OF ATTORNEY      KNOWN ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT - that each person whose signature appears below constitutes andappoints Joseph E. O'Dell and David R. Tomb, Jr., and each of them, their true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with fullpower of substitution and resubstitution, for them and in their name, place and power of substitution and resubstitution, for themand in their name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments)to this Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with theSecurities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority todo and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might orcould do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or either of them, or their or hissubstitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed by thefollowing persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.SIGNATURE ANDCAPACITY                                     DATE/S/EDWARDT.COTE                                           March 17,2003          Edward T. Cote, Director/S/DAVID R. TOMB,JR.                                      March 17,2003          David R. Tomb, Jr., Sr. Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director/S/JAMES W. NEWILL                                             March    17, 2003          James W. Newill, Director/S/DALE P. LATIMER                                             March    17, 2003          Dale P. Latimer, Director/S/RAY T.CHARLEY                                          March 18,2003          Ray T. Charley, Director/S/JOHN A. ROBERTSHAW, JR.                                     March    18, 2003          John A. Robertshaw, Jr., Director/S/DAVID S. DAHLMANN                                           March    18, 2003          David S. Dahlmann, Director/S/JOHN J.DOLAN                                           March 17,2003          (2)John J. Dolan, Executive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer/S/JANICE PATTI                                           March 17,2003          (1)Janice Patti, Comptroller(1) Also Chief Accounting Officer(2) Also Financial Officer99
Exhibit 24
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
  /s/ Cecil D. Conlee

Cecil D. ConleeDate: March 26, 2009
 State of:
    
    GeorgiaCounty of:
    
    Fulton
 26th March
 /s/ Sandra Gilbert

Notary Public
 May 19, 2010




---



##### 



POWER OF ATTORNEY
  /s/ George C. Guynn

George C. GuynnDate: March 26, 2009
 State of:
    
    GeorgiaCounty of:
    
    Fulton
 26th March
 /s/ Sandra Gilbert

Notary Public
 May 19, 2010




---



##### 



POWER OF ATTORNEY
  /s/ J. Reese Lanier, Sr.

J. Reese Lanier, Sr.Date: March 26, 2009
 State of:
    
    GeorgiaCounty of:
    
    Fulton
 26th March
 /s/ Sandra Gilbert

Notary Public
 May 19, 2010




---



##### 



POWER OF ATTORNEY
  /s/ Dennis M. Love

Dennis M. LoveDate: March 26, 2009
 
 26th March
 /s/ Rita L. Benfield

Notary Public
 November 8, 2010




---



##### 



POWER OF ATTORNEY
  /s/ Clarence H. Smith

Clarence H. SmithDate: March 26, 2009
 State of:
    
    GeorgiaCounty of:
    
    Fulton
 26th March
 /s/ Sandra Gilbert

Notary Public
 May 19, 2010




---



##### 



POWER OF ATTORNEY
  /s/ Helen B. Weeks

Helen B. WeeksDate: March 26, 2009
 State of:
    
    GeorgiaCounty of:
    
    Fulton
 26th March
 /s/ Sandra Gilbert

Notary Public
 May 19, 2010




---



##### 



POWER OF ATTORNEY
  /s/ E. Jenner Wood III

E. Jenner Wood IIIDate: March 26, 2009
 State of:
    
    GeorgiaCounty of:
    
    Fulton
 26th March
 /s/ Sandra Gilbert

Notary Public
 May 19, 2010
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23



              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
              ---------------------------------------------------

The Board of Directors of J. C. Penney
Funding Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in:  (1) the Registration Statement
(No. 33-28390) on Form S-8; (2) the Registration Statement (No. 33-59666) on
Form S-8; (3) the Registration Statement (No. 33-59668) on Form S-8; (4) the
Registration Statement (No. 33-66070) on Form S-8; (5) the Registration
Statement  (No. 33-66072) on Form S-8; (6) the Registration Statement (No. 33-
56993) on Form S-8; (7) the Registration Statement (No. 33-56995) on Form S-8;
(8) the Registration Statement (No. 333-13949) on Form S-8; (9) the Registration
Statement (No. 333-13951) on Form S-8; (10) the Registration Statement (No. 333-
22627) on Form S-8; (11) the Registration Statement (No. 333-22607) on Form S-8;
(12) the Registration Statement (No. 333-23339) on Form S-3; and (13) the
Registration Statement (No. 333-06883) on Form S-3 of J. C.  Penney Company,
Inc. of our report dated February 27, 1997, relating to the balance sheets of J.
C. Penney Funding Corporation as of January 25, 1997, January 27, 1996, and
January 28, 1995, and the related statements of income, reinvested earnings, and
cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the 1996 Annual
Report of J. C. Penney Funding Corporation, which Annual Report is incorporated
by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of J. C. Penney Funding
Corporation for the year ended January 25, 1997.


                                                /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 24, 1997