alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 

1800 Washington Boulevard. Baltimore MD 21230 MDE 410-537-3000. 1-800-633-6101 

Martin O'Malley Robert M. Summers, Ph.D 

Governor Acting Secretary 

Anthony G. Brown 

Lieutenant Governor 

DEC 15 2010
 

Mr. Shawn M. GaNin
 

Regional Administrator (3RAOO)
 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region III 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia PA 19103-2029 

Dear Mr. GaNin: 

The purpose of this letter is to submit the enclosed State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision #10-10 

concerning the definition of "Fuel-burning equipment." This SIP Revision includes amendments to 

Regulation .01 under COMAR 26.11.01 General Administrative Provisions and Regulation .01 under 

COMAR 26.11.09 Control of Fuel-Burning Equipment, Stationary Internal Combustion Engines, and 

Certain Fuel-Burning Installations. 

The Notice of Proposed Action for this SIP Revision was published in the Maryland Register on July 2, 

2010. A public hearing was held on August 4, 2010. The action was adopted on August 26, 2010. The 

Notice of Final Action was published on September 10, 2010 and the amendments became effective on 

September 20, 2010. All administrative procedures were properly followed throughout the adoption 

process. 

If you have any questions concerning this SI P submittal, please feel free to call me at (410) 537-4187 or 

Mr. George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director of the Air and Radiation Management Administration, at (410) 

537-3255. 

Sincerely, 

%67f1
 

Robert M. Summers, Ph.D 

Acting Secretary 

RMS:dhr 

Enclosures 

Recycled Paper www.mde.state.md.us TTY Users 1-800-735-2258 

Via Maryland Relay Service
- 1

- 

### S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

**C O U R T O F A P P E A L S**

ROBERT A. RUFFINS, by Conservator, JOHN R. RUFFINS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant, UNPUBLISHED January 18, 2018

v No. 335305 Livingston Circuit Court DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY, LC No. 13

- 027760

- NO

Defendant

- Appellee.

Before: M URPHY

, P .J., and S AWYER and B ECKERING , JJ.

P ER C URIAM

.

In a previous opinion in this case, this Court directed as follows:

Because DTE entitled to summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) with respect to the element of causation, and because causation, as opposed to rule violations, would not have been a matter for the MPSC to explore, we reverse the trial court’s primary jurisdiction ruling and remand for entry of judgment in

favor of DTE. [ Ruffins v DTE Electric Co , unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, p 4, issued April 28, 2016 (Docket No. 325443)

. ]

Plaintiff did not appeal the ruling to our Supreme Court, and on remand to the trial court, plaintiff fi led a supplemental submission of evidence, arguing that the evidence established an issue of fact on causation. Wisely, the trial court rejected the submission and argument and entered judgment in favor of DTE as ordered by this Court. Plaintiff now appe als. Under the rule of mandate, “ a lower court must strictly comply with, and may not exceed the scope of, a

remand order. ” Int’l Business Machines Corp v Dep’t of Treasury , 316 Mich App 346, 352; 891 NW2d 880 (2016) . The trial court properly entered ju dgment in favor of DTE. Assuming that plaintiff can even validly file an appeal to this Court under the circumstances, the trial court’s ruling is affirmed.

Affirmed. Taxable costs are awarded to DTE under MCR 7.219.

/s/ William B. Murphy

/s/ David H. Sawyer /s/ Jane M. Beckering
# C_2022335EN.01000101.xml

| 2.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10839 – APOLLO CAPITAL MANAGEMENT / SCHUR FLEXIBLES GROUP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 335/01)

On 25 August 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10839. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10839. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2891 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to inflation adjust the $5,000 

limitation with respect to dependent care assistance programs and flexible 

spending arrangements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2015 

Mr. MOOLENAAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to inflation 

adjust the $5,000 limitation with respect to dependent 

care assistance programs and flexible spending arrangements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INFLATION ADJUSTMENT FOR DEPENDENT 

4 CARE ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS AND FLEXIBLE 

5 SPENDING ARRANGEMENTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 129(a)(2) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following new subparagraph: 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2891 IH

1 ‘‘(D) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In the 

2 case of any taxable year beginning after Decem3 ber 31, 2015, the dollar amounts in subpara4 graph (A) shall be increased by an amount 

5 equal to— 

6 ‘‘(i) such amount, multiplied by 

7 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de8 termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal9 endar year in which such taxable year be10 gins by substituting ‘calendar year 2014’ 

11 for ‘calendar year 1992’ in subparagraph 

12 (B) thereof. 

13 If any increase determined under this para14 graph is not a multiple of $50, such increase 

15 shall be rounded to the next lowest multiple of 

16 $50.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

19 December 31, 2015. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information from the Company's
consolidated financial statements as of and for the nine months ended September
30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,431
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,712
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,261
<PP&E>                                         120,812
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,095
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,811
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,690
<BONDS>                                         21,202
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           216
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   139,811
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,344
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,211
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,478
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,963
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,637
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,326
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,326
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
Final Notes July 9 , 2010 

### Steam Study Data Review Notes Mercury in Water Method 1631 Revision E (2002) ( Oxidation, Purge and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry )

1. For th e determination of total Hg, the sample s should be preserved by adding 5 ml/L of BrCl solution in a mercury

- free clean area in the laboratory within 48 hours of collection

. (1631E/8.5) . If reported, indicate the elapsed time between sample collection and preservation and list any samples that were not preserved in time.

2. For dissolved Hg, the sampl es should be filtered before preservation using a 0.45 μm capsule filter in a mercury

- free clean area in the laboratory within 48 hours of collection. Immediately after filtration, the samples should be preserved with 5 ml/L of BrCl solution (1631E/6.1.3/8 .4). If reported indicate the elapsed time between sample collection, filtration, and preservation and list any samples that were not filtered or preserved in time.

3. S ample bottles should be stored in new pol yethylene bags until analysis i s completed.

4. Becau se of the presence o f sulfides and organic matter, sample may req uire the addition of more BrCl. Enough BrCl should be added to the samples to m aint ain a yellow color for 12 hours (1631E/11.1.1)

.
5. To prevent carryover samples should be run in the following order: FGD effluent and FGD influent

.

6. A ll samples should be analyzed consistently with one system either the bubbler system or the flow injection system

.

7. MS/MSD sample s should be analyzed for each midpoint and effluent point in a sampling episode . T he con centration of Hg added to the MS/MSD samples should be either 1

- 5 times the ML (0.5 ng/L) or 1

- 5 times the background concentration whichever is greater

.
8. The concentration of Hg in the bubbler blank or system blank should be used to calculate Hg concentrat ion as designated in the formu las in Method 1631E. Note whether the lab has automatically incorporated the bubbler blank or system blank into the data results (1631E/12.2.2/12.3.2)

.

9. *If the analyte concentration in a sample was less than 5 times the analyt e concentration in the method blank, report the result as a nondetect . List all affected samples:

10. *If the analyte concentration in a sample was less than 10 times but greater than 5 times the analyte concentration in the method blank, report the result as an estimated value . List all affected samples:Steam Study Data Review Notes Mercury in Water Method 1631 Revision E (2002) Page 2 of 2

Final Notes July 9, 2010 11. R eagent, method, and field blanks with concentrations below the ML, but above or at the MDL should be reported in ng/L with two significant figures . Note whether the lab automatically reported the data in this way.

12. R eagent, method, and field blanks with concentrations below the MDL should be reported as <0.2 ng/L (1631E/12.5) . Note whether the lab automatically reported the data in this way.

13. If reported, note if positive hits were checked for contamination and/or carryover?
Exhibit 32.1

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of ADDvantage
Technologies Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report") I, Kenneth A. Chymiak, the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained on the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                     By: /s/ Kenneth A. Chymiak
                     ----------------------------
                     Name:  Kenneth A. Chymiak
                     Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                            Chief Financial Officer
                     Date:  February 11, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,216
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,246
<PP&E>                                             108
<DEPRECIATION>                                      22
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 368,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,789
<BONDS>                                        318,536
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,074
<OTHER-SE>                                    (26,998)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   368,501
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   129
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,409
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,280)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,280)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      343
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      618
        

</TABLE>
NO.01-15-00649-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

. FOR THE FRIST

JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

DARIOUS LINDSEY, Appellant

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 351sf

Judicial District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1435106

APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

JAMESMSIMS

440 LOUISIANA ST., SUITE 200

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002

713-521-3000

713-224-2815 FAX

ST ATE BAR NO.18425000

EMAIL:lawyersimsl@live.com

COUNSEL ON APPEAL

ACCEPTED

01-15-00649-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

12/7/2015 12:34:09 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/7/2015 12:34:09 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW, DARIOUS LINDSEY, appellant, by and through his

appointed counsel on appeal, and respectfully request this Honorable Court grant

an Extension of Time for Filing Appellant's Brief. The present date for filing the

Brief is Novemberll, 2015, and it is respectfully requested that said time be

extended until December 25, 2015. For cause, appellant would show the court as

follows:

I

On July 16,2014, appellant was convicted of POSS CS PG 1< 1G , in the

351st District Court of Harris County, Texas entitled The State of Texas vs.

DARIOUS LINDSEY, in the Cause Number 1435106and was sentenced to

one year Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institution Division. No

motion for New Trial was filed and written Notice of Appeal was given July

24,2015.

II

Counsel is unable to timely file the Brief within the time period from the first

extension of filing the Reporter's Record for the following reasons:

1. Counsel is preparing for the following Trials:

State of Texas v. Jasmine Barber, Cause Number 1462767(l'oss MARl) 40Z .•

5 LBS.)(setto begin December 4,2015) .

State of Texas v. Shannon Fontenot, Cause Number 1486531, 1486532 POSS

WIM / D GP 3 /4 CS- 200-399G (F) MAN / DEL CS PG II 4-400 GRAMS (set to begin January

5,2016).

2
Counsel has the following in in court: State vs. Brandon Deleon, NO.1446207,

1472022; State vs. Angela Riaz, NO.2051326; State vs. Juan Castillo, NO.1475433;

State vs De'Andr Barrett, NO.2030539,2030S94.

II

Counsel feels that if the additional time is granted, the Brief in this cause will be

filed timely.

III

This is the first (lSI) extension requested.

IV

This motion is urged at the first opportunity as appellant is indigent and will suffer

irremediable if it is not granted.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, appellant prays that this

Honorable Court grant this extension of time in which to file the Appellant's Brief until

December 16,2015.

Respectfully submitted,

~s~~~

Texas Bar No. 18425000

440 Louisiana Street, Suite 200

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 521-3000

(713) 224-2815 FAX

3

marie@georgeparnham.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 11 day of November, 2015, a true and correct

copy of the foregoing Motion was sent to the District Attorney's Office, Appellate

Division.

4
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal Service TM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 313 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov*, Docket Nos. MC2024-645, CP2024-654.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21341 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 23

- 00364

- CV

In re Terry Richardson

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). We lift

the stay of the proceedings in the underlying case. See id . R. 52.10.

_______________________ ___________________

Thomas J . Baker , Justice

Before Justices Baker, Kelly, and Smith

Filed: January 30, 2024
Edward Thomas Zakarian, Private Pilot – Section 333 Amendment Petition

To: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Rm. W12-140

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Fr: Edward Thomas Zakarian, 3169 Santa Margarita Road, West palm Beach, Florida 

33411

Date: July 28, 2015

Regarding: Request to amend and allow for an additional aircraft on 

exemption #11739, docket No. FAA-2015-0893 and to amend altitude to 

include “at or below 400 feet Above Ground Level” (AGL).

Dear Sir or Madam:

On June 5, 2015, I was granted exemption under Section 333 of the “FAA Modernization 

and Reform Act of 2012” (the “Reform Act”), number 11739 for the purpose of aerial 

data collection. I respectfully request to amend my exemption to allow for an additional 

sUAS, the DJI Phantom 3, to be operated in full compliance with the conditions as set 

forth within subject exemption.

Exemption No. 11739 allowed for operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision + UAS, the DJI 

Phantom 3 I am requesting to operate possesses the same operating specifications and 

weight criteria, but with the addition of technology upgrades to its electronics making this 

an even safer aircraft to operate. The Phantom 3 will be operated in full compliance 

within the same terms and conditions contained under Exemption 11739 and within the 

safety guidelines specified in the manufacturers operating manual. I have attached 

Phantom 3 manual in the docket for your reference.

I also request subject exemption be amended from the current “at or below 200 feet 

AGL” limitation to “at or below 400 feet AGL”. This altitude limitation has been granted 

in similar exemptions such as Exemption No. 12157. Authorization to operate at or 

below 400 feet AGL shall be conducted in accordance to all FAA airspace and safety 

guidelines and would allow my services to be competitive to other Aerial Data Collection 

companies permitted to operate at the higher altitude.

As there is no change in the conditions of Exemption 11739, other than those specified 

above, the exemption awarded continues to benefit the public interest and safety, I 

request my petition to amend subject exemption be granted. Further, should the examiner 

determine not to approve either of my two proposed amendments, I ask they be 

considered individually so as not to negatively effect one another.

Sincerely,

Edward Thomas Zakarian
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0048 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHRISTIAN NYANFORE ,

Defendant and Appellant .

GRANT Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until May 11 , 2020 to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court April 7 2020

04/07/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0048