alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I,  Dennis  Sunshine, Chief Executive Officer of Orbit International Corp.,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as enacted by  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     the  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,
2006  (the "Annual Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with
the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934;  and

     (2)     information  contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations of Orbit
International  Corp.

Dated: March 30, 2007
                                   /s/ Dennis Sunshine
                                   -------------------
                                   Dennis Sunshine
                                   Chief Executive Officer

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Orbit International Corp. and will
be  retained  by  Orbit  International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
# C_2022240EN.01001101.xml

| 22.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10722 – CHEVRON / RENEWABLE ENERGY GROUP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 240/02)

On 7 June 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10722. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10722. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              Washington, DC 20549


                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                         ______________________________

       DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported): September 9, 2008

                         ______________________________

                           FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                         _______________________________

         INDIANA                     0-17071                   35-1544218
(State or other jurisdiction  (Commission File Number)       (IRS Employer
     of incorporation)                                    Identification No.)


                             200 East Jackson Street
                                  P.O. Box 792
                              Muncie, IN 47305-2814
          (Address of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code)


                                 (765) 747-1500
              (Registrant's Telephone Number, including Area Code)


         Check the appropriate  box  below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to
simultaneously  satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the
following provisions:

[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)

[ ] Soliciting  material  pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)

[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange
Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange
Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Item 7.01         Regulation FD Disclosure

                  In  response  to  questions from investors and analysts, First
Merchants  Corporation has provided additional  information beyond what has been
released.  The information provided was an estimated $8 million cost savings off
of Lincoln Bancorp's expense base. The Corporation  anticipates realizing 75% of
the cost savings in 2009 and 100% in 2010.



<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the  requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the  Registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

         DATE:  September 9, 2008

                                By: /s/  Mark K. Hardwick
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                         Mark K. Hardwick
                                         Executive Vice President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         (Principal Financial and
                                         Principal Accounting Officer)
# C_2022319EN.01000101.xml

| 23.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10785 – ICG / KONECTA / COMDATA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 319/01)

On 12 July 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10785. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10785. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022379EN.01001201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 3.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/12 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10901 – OAKTREE / ARES / VECTOR / NEOVIA)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 379/07)

1.

On 26 September 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022379EN.01001201-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Oaktree Capital Group, LLC (‘Oaktree’, United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Ares Management Corporation (‘Ares’, United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Vector Capital Management, LP (‘Vector’, United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Neovia Logistics Holdings Ltd (‘Neovia’, United States). |

Oaktree, Ares and Vector will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Neovia.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Oaktree: global alternative and non-traditional investment fund management, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Ares: global alternative investment manager, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Vector: private equity firm focused on investments in technology and technology-enabled businesses, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Neovia: logistics and supply chain service provider. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022379EN.01001201-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10901 – OAKTREE / ARES / VECTOR / NEOVIA

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022379EN.01001201-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022379EN.01001201-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
ADDENDUM TO CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE AND
                        WARRANT TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK

This Addendum to Convertible Debenture and Warrant to Purchase Common Stock
("Addendum") is entered into as of the 19th day of May 2004 by and between Radix
Marine, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("Radix"), and La Jolla Cove Investors, Inc.,
a California corporation ("LJCI").

WHEREAS, Radix and LJCI are parties to that certain 7 3/4 % Convertible
Debenture dated as of March 17, 2004 ("Debenture"); and

WHEREAS, Radix and LJCI are parties to that certain Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock dated as of March 17, 2004 ("Warrant"); and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Debenture and Warrant in certain
respects.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained
herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Radix and LJCI agree as follows:

1.    All terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the
      definitions set forth in the Debenture.

2.    Radix hereby waives, for the month of May 2004, the minimum monthly
      conversion requirement contained in section 3.1(a) of the Debenture.

3.    Except as specifically amended herein, all other terms and conditions of
      the Debenture and Warrant shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WINESS WHEREOF, Radix and LJCI have caused this Addendum to be signed by its
duly authorized officers on the date first set forth above.

Radix Marine, Inc.                         La Jolla Cove Investors, Inc.

By: __________________________             By: __________________________

Name: _______________________              Name: ________________________

Title: ________________________            Title: _________________________

                                       1
Filed 5/26/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2016 ND 92

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Geoffrey Timm, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20150332

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Britta K. Demello Rice, Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 E. Thayer Ave., Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Danny L. Herbel, 3333 E. Broadway Ave., Ste. 1205, Bismarck, ND 58501, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

State v. Timm

No. 20150332

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Geoffrey Timm appealed a criminal judgment after he conditionally pled guilty to driving under the influence, reserving the right to appeal a district court order denying his motion to suppress evidence of a blood draw.  Timm argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the arresting officer did not have a warrant for a blood draw and the officer’s reading of the implied consent advisory rendered Timm’s consent involuntary, resulting in an unconstitutional search under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and N.D. Const. art. I, § 8.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).  State v. Gackle, 2015 ND 271, ¶ 5, 871 N.W.2d 589 (stating “[t]his Court has previously determined, in the context of post-arrest chemical tests, that the state’s implied consent statute, which criminalizes refusal, is not coercive merely by the reading of the advisory.”). 

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Carol Ronning Kapsner
# C_2022307EN.01002601.xml

| 12.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 307/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 307/26

---

Corrigendum to Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10803 – ELKEM / HYDRO ENERGI INVEST / ALTOR FUND MANAGER / VIANODE) – Candidate case for simplified procedure

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 302 of 8 August 2022
  )

(2022/C 307/11)

On page 2, point 1, first line:

for:

‘On 29 July 2022, ...’,

read:

‘On 1 August 2022, ...’.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4106

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ZENOBIA B. PENN, a/k/a Tiny,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge.

(CR-01-115-L)

Submitted: May 31, 2005 Decided: June 21, 2005

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold I. Glaser, GLASER & SOLOMON, L.L.C., Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellant. Allen F. Loucks, United States Attorney,

Christopher J. Romano, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Zenobia B. Penn appeals her conviction after a jury trial

of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute

more than five kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(a)(1) (2000). She asserts that the district court erred in

denying her motions to suppress evidence and to exclude her grand

jury testimony. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint

appendix, the transcript of the district court’s ruling from the

bench, and the court’s order denying the motions. Finding no

reversible error, we affirm. 

With regard to the denial of the motion to suppress, we

conclude that the district court did not err. Penn’s airport

encounter with law enforcement officials did not amount to a

seizure under the Fourth Amendment. See Ornelas v. United States,

517 U.S. 690, 699 (1996) (stating standard of review for denial of

motion to suppress); Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429, 436-37

(1991) (providing standard to determine whether police-citizen

encounter amounts to seizure); United States v. Weaver, 282 F.3d

302, 309-10 (4th Cir. 2002) (same and setting forth factors to

consider). We also agree with the district court that Penn

voluntarily consented to a search of her purse and person. See

United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 558 (1980) (finding that

courts should consider age, maturity, and intelligence of defendant

in determining whether consent to search was voluntary); United
- 3 -

States v. Lattimore, 87 F.3d 647, 650 (4th Cir. 1996) (en banc)

(same and noting that “conditions under which the consent to search

was given” also relevant). Nor do we find any abuse of discretion

in the district court’s denial of Penn’s motion to exclude her

grand jury testimony. See United States v. Hodge, 354 F.3d 305,

312 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm Penn’s conviction. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CAFETERIA
OPERATORS, L.P. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 28,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-2000
<CASH>                                           5,011
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,042
<ALLOWANCES>                                        14
<INVENTORY>                                      6,480
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,490
<PP&E>                                         114,751
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,276
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,365
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,815
<BONDS>                                         55,220
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (16,638)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,365
<SALES>                                         47,764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,764
<CGS>                                           14,036
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,941
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  85
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,702
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,702
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,702
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Charge Questions AHETF Study Proposal: Closed System Loading of Liquids in Re turnable and Non-Returnable Containers

Study Title : “Closed System Loading of Liquids in Returnable and Non-Returnable Containers (AHE500)”

If the AHETF closed system liquid loading st udy proposal is revised as suggested in EPA’s
review and if the research is performed as described:

1. Is the research likely to generate scientif ically reliable data, us eful for assessing the exposure of workers using closed systems to load liquid pesticide products from
returnable or nonret urnable containers?

2. Is the research likely to meet the applicab le requirements of 40 CFR part 26, subparts K
and L?
# C_2022023EN.01000101.xml

| 17.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10519 – BLACKSTONE / INTERPLEX)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 23/01)

On 3 January 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10519. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10519. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---