OPINION

No. 04-10-00061-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.J.L., J.M.L., L.M.E., G.X.E., Jr., and M.A.E.

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-PA-00463

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 21, 2010

RECORD ORDERED

This is an appeal from the trial court’s termination of appellant’s parental rights. Because 

the trial court found the appeal frivolous, appellant was not entitled to a free copy of the record 

from the termination trial. Appellant’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief stating 

that after reviewing the record of the new trial hearing he could not say the trial court abused its 

discretion in determining appellant’s appeal was frivolous, presumably because he could not 

review the record from the termination trial. Therefore, appellate counsel urges this court to 

adopt a local rule requiring the filing of the full record from the trial on the merits in parental 

rights termination cases without the necessity of alleging trial counsel was ineffective. We 

decline to do so in all cases for two reasons.
04-10-00061-CV

- 2 -

First, this court has held that a full record of the termination trial is not always necessary 

to ascertain whether a trial court has abused its discretion in determining an appeal is frivolous. 

In re T.C., 299 S.W.3d 828, 828 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, no pet.). A full record may be 

required only if “[a]fter reviewing the record from the new trial hearing, we are unable to 

determine whether the trial court acted within its discretion from that record alone.” Id. In other 

words, if the record of the new trial hearing contains a summary of the evidence adduced at the 

termination trial, both in support of and contrary to the termination order, then a determination, 

based only upon the record of the new trial hearing, of whether the trial court abused its 

discretion is generally possible. This places an obligation on the attorneys for the State, the 

respondent(s), and any ad litems to present a full summary of the evidence adduced at the 

termination trial. Conclusory statements by counsel that the evidence was sufficient or 

insufficient are inadequate. And, trial courts should require attorneys to present a full summary 

of the evidence, even if the judge hearing the motion for new trial is the same judge who 

presided over the termination trial.

Second, we recognize appellants may raise ineffective assistance of counsel for the first 

time on appeal. See In re J.O.A., 283 S.W.3d 336, 339 (Tex. 2009). However, in order to obtain 

a free record on appeal, such a claim must be more than merely a conclusory statement that trial 

counsel was ineffective. Appellate counsel must present allegations of the manner in which trial 

counsel was ineffective and arguments in support of the claim before this court will consider 

ordering a free record to be filed.

In this case, the record from the new trial hearing contains no summary of the evidence

adduced at trial. Instead, the record contains only conclusory statements by the attorneys that the 

evidence was either insufficient or sufficient. Therefore, based upon a review of only the record 
04-10-00061-CV

- 3 -

from the new trial hearing, it is impossible to ascertain whether the trial court abused its 

discretion. Accordingly, a review of the reporter’s record from the termination proceeding is 

necessary to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion. In re T.C., 299 S.W.3d at 

828.

It is therefore ordered that the court reporter shall, on or before thirty (30) days from the 

date of this opinion and order, and without cost to the appellant, prepare and file the reporter’s 

record containing all of the evidence admitted at the termination trial.1

 We further deny 

appellant’s motion to withdraw and strike appellant’s brief filed on April 20, 2010 and order

appellant to file a brief on whether the appeal is frivolous on or before twenty (20) days after the 

date the reporter’s record is filed. Appellee’s brief is ordered to be filed on or before twenty (20) 

days after the date appellant’s brief on frivolity is filed. 

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

 1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(d). This order does not require the court reporter to prepare a reporter’s record of any 

nonevidentiary portions of the trial, such as pretrial hearings, voir dire, closing arguments, and post judgment 

proceedings.