alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 270 

To continue the use of a 3-month quarter EHR reporting period for health 

care providers to demonstrate meaningful use for 2015 under the Medicare and Medicaid EHR incentive payment programs, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2015 

Mrs. ELLMERS (for herself, Mr. KIND, Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, and Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To continue the use of a 3-month quarter EHR reporting 

period for health care providers to demonstrate meaningful use for 2015 under the Medicare and Medicaid EHR 

incentive payment programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flexibility in Health 

5 IT Reporting (Flex-IT) Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 270 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONTINUING USE OF 3-MONTH QUARTER EHR RE2 PORTING PERIODS FOR PROFESSIONALS AND 

3 HOSPITALS TO DEMONSTRATE MEANINGFUL 

4 USE FOR 2015 UNDER THE MEDICARE AND 

5 MEDICAID EHR INCENTIVE PAYMENT PRO6 GRAMS. 

7 In specifying the EHR reporting period under part 

8 495 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, for purposes 

9 of titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act, the 

10 Secretary of Health and Human Services shall continue 

11 through 2015 (in the case of eligible professionals) and 

12 fiscal year 2015 (in the case of eligible hospitals and crit13 ical access hospitals) to permit the use of a 3-month quar14 ter EHR reporting period to demonstrate meaningful use 

15 for purposes of such part, without regard to the payment 

16 year or the stage of meaningful use criteria involved. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 287 

To enhance the energy security of United States allies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2015 

Mr. TURNER (for himself, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. BRIDENSTINE, Mr. KELLY

of Pennsylvania, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. SCHOCK, Mr. 

PEARCE, Mr. LATTA, Mr. STIVERS, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. 

FARENTHOLD, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. LANCE, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, 

Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. DENT, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, 

Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. 

MARINO, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Ms. JENKINS of Kansas, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. 

WESTERMAN, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. KLINE, Mr. BARLETTA, Mr. TIPTON, 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. PITTENGER, and Mr. SALMON) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To enhance the energy security of United States allies, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Job Creation 

5 and Strategic Alliances LNG Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 287 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

2 Section 3(c) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 

3 717b(c)) is amended— 

4 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘For purposes’’; 

5 (2) by striking ‘‘a nation with which there is in 

6 effect a free trade agreement requiring national 

7 treatment for trade in natural gas’’ and inserting ‘‘a 

8 World Trade Organization member nation’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘World 

11 Trade Organization member nation’ means a country de12 scribed in section 2(10) of the Uruguay Round Agree13 ments Act (19 U.S.C. 3501(10)).’’. 

14 SEC. 3. PENDING APPLICATIONS. 

15 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply with 

16 respect to applications for the authorization to export nat17 ural gas under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 

18 U.S.C. 717b) that are pending on, or filed on or after, 

19 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10(e)

Contract No:	34050

Amendment No:	05

 

AMENDMENT

Date	Mar 09, 2000

"Transporter":	ANR PIPELINE COMPANY

"Shipper":	THE PEOPLES GAS LIGHT & COKE COMPANY

 

Effective Apr 01, 2000, Shipper and Transporter have agreed to amend FSS Contract No. 34050 dated Sep 21, 1994 ("Agreement") as follows:

Extend the term of this Agreement to March 31, 2003. An updated Contract Quantity Exhibit reflecting this change is attached.
Revise Shipper's contract quantities (MSQ, BMDIQ, and BMDWQ) to incorporate Transporter's Use % (fuel matrix) revisions pursuant to Transporter's Annual Redetermination Filing effective April 1, 2000. An updated Contract Quantity Exhibit reflectingthese changes is attached.
Restate Article 8 - Further Agreement as follows:

8.A	For the period April 1, 2000 through March 31, 2003, the rates for storage service up to the MSQ and MDWQ under this Agreement shall be a Deliverability Rate of $2.45 and a Capacity Rate of $0.4000. In addition, Shipper will be charged theMinimum Commodity Rate for injection and withdrawals and Transporter's Use ("Fuel") in accordance with Transporter's FERC Gas Tariff which is subject to change from time to time.

8.B	If, for any reason. Transporter is prohibited from charging and/or collecting the revenues generated under this Agreement on the basis of the reservation and commodity rates set forth in Paragraph 8(A) above, then Transporter shall have theright to adjust (prospectively only) such reservation and/or commodity rates so as to enable Transporter to charge and collect the same level of revenues Transporter would have received as previously agreed between Transporter and Shipper.

8.C	From time to time, dependent upon Transporter's Use percents, the MSQ under this Agreement and MDQ's under ETS Agreement No. 3050 will be adjusted to allow Shipper to deliver and store sufficient fuel quantities to effectuate a 50-day storagewithdrawal quantity of 75,000 dth at the specified Delivery Points at no additional charge.

All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
#### GAVIN et ux. v. WEBB et al.

No. 22444.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Jan. 20, 1937.

Motion for Rehearing Denied Feb. 10, 1937.

Clark, Harrell & Clark, of Greenville, for plaintiffs in error.

Mayo W. Neyland and Morgan & Mor-‘ gan, all of Greenville, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

This case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction under the provisions of subdivision 6 of article 1728, R.C.S. 1925 as amended by Acts 1927, c. 144, § 1 (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 1728, subd. 6). In this connection we wish to say that we are in disagreement with much that is said in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, but in'spite of this we think that, if we should grant this writ, we would be compelled to affirm this case.

On Motion for Rehearing.

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that appellant’s brief in the Court of Civil Appeals was sufficient and should have been considered in its entirety. In spite of this, we have examined this record and all briefs, and are of the opinion that correct judgments were entered by the two lower courts.
#### KENNISON v. STATE.

No. 18322.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 10, 1936.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 14, 1936.

L. H. Welch and Floyd Jones, both of Breckenridge, for appellant.

Ben J. Dean, Dist. Atty., of Breckenridge, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

■ Theft of cattle is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The state’s attorney before this court objects to the consideration of the statement of facts and bills of exception for the reason that same were not filed within the time prescribed by law. The motion for new trial was -overruled and notice of appeal given on June 27, 1935. Ninety days were allowed for the preparation and filing of the bills of exception and statement of facts, which time expired on September 25, 1935. The bills of exception and statement of facts found in the record were not filed until January 15, 1936. Under the circumstances, the bills of exception and statement of facts cannot be considered by this court. See article 760, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P., and annotations in Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P. vol. 3, Pocket Supplement, note 36, and cases cited.

In the absence of the statement of facts and bills of exception, nothing is presented justifying reversal or requiring discussion.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant insists that we erred in refusing to consider the statement of facts and bills of exception because filed too late, the record showing that notice of appeal was given in the court below on June 27, 1935, and the statement of facts and bills of exception being filed in January, 1936, obviously too late. Accompanying appellant’s motion is the affidavit of his attorneys showing that the statement of facts and bills of exception were presented to the trial court on September 27, 1935. If we considered such affidavits as making a sufficient attack upon the correctness of the record, which we cannot do in its present condition, still said statement of facts and bills of exception would show to have been pre*187sented to the trial court for his approval two days after the expiration of the time allowed by law within which said documents should have been filed after their approval. Manifestly, our. general statement in the opinion that said documents were filed too late' would be correct in any event.

The motion for rehearing will be overruled.
Description of Registrant's cash bonus plan



 Exhibit 10.14 
  
 Description of the Cash Bonus Program of SWS Group, Inc. 
  
 A component of the executive officer compensation program of SWS Group, Inc. (the “Company”) consists of cash
bonuses based on the Company’s fiscal year operating results and the individual executive officer’s contribution for the year. The incentive compensation program provides for an aggregate bonus pool based on the Company’s annual
return on equity. Allocation of the bonus pool to individual executive officers is determined using objective measures of business unit performance as well as subjective measures of the executive officer’s contribution to the Company’s
financial and strategic objectives. If awarded, bonuses are paid early in the following fiscal year. The Company’s Compensation Committee believes that basing a portion of an executive officer’s compensation on performance motivates the
executive to perform at the highest possible level.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

OCTOBER 18, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-14646

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-00229-CV-RP

CYNTHIA L. ROBINSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC,

SPEEDWAY SUPER AMERICAN, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

_________________________

(October 18, 2006)

Before ANDERSON and DUBINA, Circuit Judges, and VINSON,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

_____________________

*Honorable C. Roger Vinson, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Florida,

sitting by designation.
2

The judgment of the district court is affirmed because plaintiff has failed to

prove causation for the reasons fully discussed at oral argument.

AFFIRMED.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

RESOURCE INVESTMENTS, INC. AND LAND 

RECOVERY, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2014-5069

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 1:98-cv-00419-LB, Judge Lawrence J. 

Block.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RESOURCE INVESTMENTS, INC. AND LAND 

RECOVERY, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________ 

2014-5099

______________________ 

Case: 14-5069 Document: 30 Page: 1 Filed: 08/27/2014
2 RESOURCE INVESTMENTS, INC. v. US

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 1:98-cv-00419-LB, Judge Lawrence J. 

Block.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the United States’ unopposed 

motion to dismiss appeal no. 2014-5099, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

 (1) The motion to dismiss appeal no. 2014-5099 is

granted. Appeal no. 2014-5099 is dismissed. Each side

shall bear its own costs in appeal no. 2014-5099. 

(2) The revised official caption in 2014-5069 is reflected above.

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court

s26

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (As to 2014-5099 only): 

August 27, 2014

Case: 14-5069 Document: 30 Page: 2 Filed: 08/27/2014
# C_2022016EN.01000601.xml

| 13.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/6

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2022/C 16/05)

| 1. | As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below. |
| --- | --- |

1.

2.   Procedure

Union producers may submit a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

| 4. | This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.









  Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Barium carbonate | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1759 of 27 September 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of barium carbonate originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (OJ L 250, 28.9.2017, p. 34) | 29.9.2022 |

4.

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

Barium carbonate

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1759 of 27 September 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of barium carbonate originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(OJ L 250, 28.9.2017, p. 34)

29.9.2022

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight (00:00) of the day mentioned in this column.

---
# C_2022102EN.01000201.xml

| 2.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10608 – CMA CGM / CLS BUSINESS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 102/02)

On 25 February 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10608. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10608. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SBI COMMUNICATIONS,  INC. FOR THE QUARTERLY
PERIOD  ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            41,252
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    742,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                     550,000
<INVENTORY>                                       24,391
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 157,892
<PP&E>                                         7,593,952
<DEPRECIATION>                                   631,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,336,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            531,506
<BONDS>                                          238,628
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                    8,365,000
<COMMON>                                           5,345
<OTHER-SE>                                    (1,804,269)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,336,210
<SALES>                                           32,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 107,541
<CGS>                                             31,867
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    152,805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                22,826
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (150,072)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (150,072)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (150,072)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
        

</TABLE>
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3997

___________ Gary James Walker, * * Petitioner, *

* Petition for Review of an Order v. * of the Railroad Retirement Board. * Railroad Retirement Board, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. *

___________ Submitted: December 7, 1999 Filed: December 10, 1999

___________ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Gary James Walker petitions for review of an order of the Railroad Retirement Board (Board) denying his appeal. Walker contends the Board erroneously decided it was required to honor a state court order that a portion of Walker's Railroad Retirement Act disability benefits be paid to his former wife. Having reviewed the record and the parties' submissions, we conclude the Board's finding that it was requiredby law and regulationto comply with the order was supported by substantial evidence. See 45 U.S.C. § 231m(b)(2); 20 C.F.R. §§ 295.2-.4; King v. Railroad Retirement Bd. , 981 F.2d 365, 367 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam) (standard of review).-2-

Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Board. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Letter Agreement between J. Mike Walker and Dril-Quip, Inc.


 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 October 28, 2004 
  
 Dril-Quip, Inc. 
 13550 Hempstead Hwy. 
 Houston, Texas 77040 
  
 Gentlemen: 
  
 In light of the
current uncertainty surrounding stock option expensing, I hereby waive my right to receive an award of stock options in 2004 pursuant to Section 3.C of the Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) dated as of October 17, 1997
between myself and Dril-Quip, Inc. (the “Company”). Additionally, I hereby waive any right to terminate the Employment Agreement for Good Reason (as defined in the Employment Agreement) specifically caused by the Company’s failure to
award such stock options in the year 2004 only. No other conditions or rights of the contract are waived and the right to receive an award of stock options is only waived for the year 2004. 
  

	
	 Very truly yours,

	
	 /s/ J. Mike Walker




  
 Accepted and Agreed as of the

 date first written above. 
  

			
	 DRIL-QUIP, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Gary D. Smith


	 Name:
	 	 Gary D. Smith

	 Title:
	 	 Co-CEO