alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


Exhibit 11 - Computation of Earnings Per Share

TIB Financial Corp.


                     (In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the three months ended September 30:                         1997     1996
----------------------------------------                        ----------------
<S>                                                             <C>      <C>
Net Income                                                          807      823
                                                                 ---------------
Weighted average of common shares outstanding                     4,360    4,286

Add Common stock equivalents determined using the "Treasury      
Stock" method representing shares issuable upon exercise of      
director and employee stock options using annual average         
market price                                                        326      215
                                                                 ---------------
Weighted average number of shares used in calculation of         
primary earnings per share                                        4,686    4,501
                                                                 ---------------
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE                                       $ 0.17   $ 0.18
                                                                 ===============
For the nine months ended September 30:                          
---------------------------------------                          

Net Income                                                        2,439    2,323
                                                                 ---------------
Weighted average of common shares outstanding                     4,349    4,276

Add Common stock equivalents determined using the "Treasury      
Stock" method representing shares issuable upon exercise of      
director and employee stock options using annual average         
market price                                                        261      205
                                                                 ---------------
Weighted average number of shares used in calculation of         
primary earnings per share                                        4,610    4,481
                                                                 ---------------
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE                                       $ 0.53   $ 0.52
                                                                 ===============
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR
THERMO BIOANALYSIS CORPORATION FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                40,516
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                         47,302
<ALLOWANCES>                           5,356
<INVENTORY>                           38,682
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     132,077
<PP&E>                                33,571
<DEPRECIATION>                         9,982
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       280,228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 47,269
<BONDS>                                  251
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                 141
<OTHER-SE>                           132,425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         280,228
<SALES>                              138,945
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     138,945
<CGS>                                 72,341
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         72,341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      10,268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         116
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     5,734
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       11,310
<INCOME-TAX>                           4,116
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    7,194
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                           7,194
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.52
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 128024 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 128024 COA: 258835 Wayne CC: 85-006350, MICHAEL BAILEY WILLIA MS, 85-006376 Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,802
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,435
<INVENTORY>                                     37,952
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,150
<PP&E>                                          20,562
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,930
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,482
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,841
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,603
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,990
<SALES>                                        117,809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,809
<CGS>                                          103,891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,876
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,958)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (724)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,234)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,234)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 135177 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 135177 COA: 279686 Lapeer CC: 03-007913-FH BRANDON MICHAEL BREWER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 14, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 8, 2008

Clerk
#### RANDOLPH v. STATE.

No. 19697.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 4, 1938.

Appeal Reinstated June 8, *1938.*

*782W. D. R. Owen, of Eastland, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The appeal bond is defective in that it fails to state that appellant has been con-' victed of a felony, as is required by article 817, C.C.P. Teel v. State, 130 Tex.Cr.R. 32, 91 S.W.2d 747. It is recited in the bond that appellant “stands charged with the offense of a felony, to-wit: theft of an automobile of the value of more than fifty dollars.” Nowhere is it shown that there was a conviction. See Wall v. State, 110 Tex.Cr.R. 116, 7 S.W.2d 958:

Appellant being . enlarged' under a fatally defective appeal bond, this court is without jurisdiction. Wall v. State, supra.

The appeal is disinissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the' Commission of Appéáls has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal- Appeals and approved by the court.

On Reinstatement of Appeal.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The record having been perfected, the appeal is reinstated and the case considered on its merits.

It appears that, through no negligence on the part of either appellant or his attorney, appellant has been deprived of a statement of facts. Upon the affidavit of the appellant, timely filed, to the effect that he was unable to pay for a statement of facts or give security therefor, the trial judge entered an order directing that the court reporter immediately prepare a statement of facts in this cause. The court reporter failed to comply with said order. On the point in question the state’s attorney before this court confesses error.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICTOR M. SAMANIEGO; BERTHA 

ALICIA SAMANIEGO, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

 v. 

LAW OFFICES OF LES ZIEVE ET. AL.; et 

al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-56354 

D.C. No. 3:19-cv-01582-TWRBGS 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Todd W. Robinson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Victor M. Samaniego and Bertha Alicia Samaniego appeal pro se from the 

district court’s judgment dismissing their action alleging federal and state law 

claims arising from the foreclosure of their home. We have jurisdiction under 28 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 20-56354 

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under the Rooker-Feldman

doctrine. Noel v. Hall, 341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the Samaniegos’ action because the 

action constitutes a forbidden “de facto appeal” of a prior state court judgment and 

raises claims that are “inextricably intertwined” with that judgment. Id. at 1163-65 

(discussing proper application of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine); see also Henrichs 

v. Valley View Dev., 474 F.3d 609, 616 (9th Cir. 2007) (Rooker-Feldman barred 

plaintiff’s claim because the relief sought “would require the district court to 

determine that the state court’s decision was wrong and thus void”).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001013564
<NAME>                        Farm Family Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           957,051
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          6,436
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            6,528
<EQUITIES>                                     39,491
<MORTGAGE>                                     27,926
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 1,062,724
<CASH>                                         27,442
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             28,256
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         22,902
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,295,228
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                440,867
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            99,147
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          521,215
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          5,830
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       61
<OTHER-SE>                                     197,594
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,295,228
<PREMIUMS>                                     114,949
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            37,345
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (1,156)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 916
<BENEFITS>                                     103,387
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    18,539
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           11,725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                31,570
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9,954
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            21,616
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   21,616
<EPS-BASIC>                                    3.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  3.50
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 186,130
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                194,529
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0



</TABLE>
# C_2022231EN.01000201.xml

| 15.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10705 – BLACKSTONE / CARLYLE / GOLDMAN SACHS / PRIMA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 231/02)

On 8 June 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10705. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10705. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20570 and #20571; TEXAS Disaster Number TX-20024]

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Administrative Rural declaration of disaster for the State of Texas dated 09/03/2024.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Beryl.                    

*Incident Period:*                         07/05/2024 through 07/09/2024.                    

      ( print page 76579)    

# DATES:

Issued on 09/10/2024.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/04/2024.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/03/2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at                         *https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of an Administrative declaration of a rural area for the State of Texas, dated 09/03/2024 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*

Harrison.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2024-21213 Filed 9-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
CBI Contact Report 

 P-00-346 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 7EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 7
Exhibit 32.1








Chief Executive Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. Longe, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Date:          August 7, 2009

/s/ Thomas J. LongeThomas J. Longe
Chief Executive Officer and President











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to TIB Financial Corp. and will be retained by TIB Financial
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7537

EDWARD WAYNE MAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus E. MONTGOMERY TUCKER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-97-1443-AM) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 2, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Wayne May, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil action purportedly filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. May v. Tucker , No. CA-97-1443-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 7, 1997). Insofar as the district court properly construed this action as a request for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), we note that we would deny a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED