alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022210EN.01002901.xml

| 25.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/29

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 210/10)

| Member State | Portugal |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Porto Santo – Funchal – Porto Santo |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | As from 24 October 2022 |
| Address where the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligations can be obtained | All documents are available from: http://www.saphety.com
  For more information please contact:





  Ministry of Infrastructure and Housing |
| Cabinet of the Secretary of State for Infrastructures |
| Av. Barbosa du Bocage, n.o 5 |
| 1049-039 Lisboa |
| PORTUGAL |

Member State

Portugal

Route concerned

Porto Santo – Funchal – Porto Santo

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

As from 24 October 2022

Address where the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligations can be obtained

All documents are available from: http://www.saphety.com

For more information please contact:

Ministry of Infrastructure and Housing

Cabinet of the Secretary of State for Infrastructures

Av. Barbosa du Bocage, n.o 5

1049-039 Lisboa

PORTUGAL

Tel. +351 210426200

Email: gabinete.seinf@mih.gov.pt

---
Exhibit 99

               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                
                     Washington, D. C. 20549

                  _____________________________


                            FORM 11-K



[X]  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

      For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997

                               OR

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE
      SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                 Commission file number 2-82760
                                
                                
                                
A. Full title of the plan and address of the plan, if different
    from that of the issuer named below:

                   Peoples Energy Corporation
                  Employee Stock Purchase Plan



B. Name of issuer of the securities held pursuant to the plan and
   the address of its principal executive office:

                   Peoples Energy Corporation
                     130 East Randolph Drive
                     Chicago, Illinois 60601


This Form 11-K is being filed for informational purposes only.




ITEM 1. An audited statement of financial condition as of the
         end of the latest two fiscal years of the plan.

       Not applicable.  Employees' payments for Company stock are
        neither segregated nor held for investment.

ITEM 2. An audited statement of income and changes in plan
        equity for each of the latest three fiscal years of the plan.

         Not applicable.  See above.
                          




                            SIGNATURE


       Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, Peoples Energy Corporation has duly caused this
annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
hereunto duly authorized.


                                      Peoples Energy Corporation
                                      Employe Stock Purchase Plan
                                           (Name of Plan)




Date: December 22, 1997                By  /s/Kenneth S. Balaskovits
                                              (Signature)
                                         Kenneth S. Balaskovits
                                         Vice President and Controller
                                         Peoples Energy Corporation
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                                     Exhibit 27


<ARTICLE>5
<MULTIPLIER>1

<S>                                                 <C>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1999        JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1999        SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       23,412,000         12,760,000
<SECURITIES>                                          0                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 7,614,000          5,369,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    604,000            105,000
<INVENTORY>                                           0                 00
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             31,351,000         23,177,000
<PP&E>                                    1,176,841,000      1,122,522,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               61,776,000         37,665,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            1,214,141,000      1,171,577,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        54,907,000        473,418,000
<BONDS>                                               0                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0                  0
<PREFERRED>                                           0                  0
<COMMON>                                      1,200,000            383,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  597,735,000        468,375,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              1,214,141,000      1,171,577,000
<SALES>                                               0                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            165,356,000         99,347,000
<CGS>                                                 0                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               194,421,000         79,340,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           38,178,000         13,798,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (66,640,000)          6,916,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (66,640,000)          6,916,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0       (25,344,000)
<CHANGES>                                  (14,230,000)                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               (80,870,000)       (18,428,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.06)              (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.06)              (.49)



<FN>
Certain amounts for the nine month period ended September 30, 1998 have been
reclassified to conform to the 1999 presentation.
</FN>



</TABLE>
Amu: OF C In VISA PETITION Proceedings

A-12042411 Decided by Board January 03,1962 Visa petition—Revocation-8 CFR 206—Appeal must be made by petitioner. Right to appeal from revocation or previously approved visa petition lies solely with petitioner. Attorney who once represented petitioner and cannot now locateher and who continues to represent beneficiary has no standing under 8 CFR 206.3 to assert an appeal.
BEFORE THE BOARD DISCUSSION: An order entered in this case on September 20,1961, revoked a visa petition approved for classification of the beneficiary as a nonquota immigrant under the provisions of 8 U.S.C.1101(a) (27) (A). Notice of the revocation was served on the petitioner and the attorney of record on September 27, 1961, by certified mail. A notice of appeal executed by the attorney of record wasreceived by the Immigration and Naturalization Service on October 12, 1961.The attorney of record appeared before this Board in oral argument on November 8, 1961. He stated, in substance, that he once represented the petitioner; that he has been unable to locate her in connection with the revocation of her petition; and that he intends to continue to represent the beneficiary.8 CFR 206.3 provides, in part: "If upon reconsideration the approval previously granted is revoked, the petitioner shall be informed of the decision with the reasons therefor and shall have 15 days after the mailing of the notification of decision within which to appeal as provided in Part 3 of this chapter .. ." (Emphasis supplied. ) It is clear from the statements of counsel that the appeal before


### ns was not intiated by the petitioner as provided in 8 CFR 206.3 (supra). Under the circumstances, this Board will not consider it on the merits. Since the appeal is not properly before us, we will dismiss for failure to comply with 8 CFR 206.3. ORDER: It is directed that the appeal be and the same is hereby clisiniseci in uecordance with the foregoing opinion.
547
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50275

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ERNESTO CALDERON-SILVERA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:12-CR-1630-1

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ernesto CalderonSilvera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Calderon-Silvera has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50275 Document: 00513804385 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
No. 16-50275

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-50275 Document: 00513804385 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
#### L. G. COOK, Plaintiff In Error, v. C. R. JACKSON, Defendant in Error.

No. 1706—6937.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section B.

Oct. 20, 1937.

E. M. Remington, Fred T. Arnold, and Marshall & King, all of Graham, for plaintiff in error.

McCombs, Andress & Johnson, Renfro & McCombs, and William Andress, Jr., all of Dallas, for defendant in error.

MARTIN; Commissioner.

Judgment was entered by the trial court in this case for plaintiff in error Cook. The Fort Worth Court of Civil Appeals reversed and remanded that judgment. See Jackson v. Cook, 82 S.W.(2d) 154, where the facts are fully stated.

The law questions presented, and the controlling facts, are precisely identical in this case with those of Palmer Publishing Co. v. Smith (Tex.Com.App.) 109 S.W.(2d) 158, this day decided. Upon this latter authority, and for the reasons stated in the opinion therein, the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals in the present case is reversed, and that of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
#### BRECHEEN et ux. v. WINK INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST.

No. 3263.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

Dec. 5, 1935.

A. T. Folsom, of Wink, for plaintiffs in error.

IT. E. Wassell, Co. Atty., of Wink, for defendant in error.

HIGGINS, Justice.

This is a suit by the defendant in error “complaining of C. L. Brecheen and wife” seeking recovery of delinquent taxes and foreclosure of lien. The petition did not state the name of Mrs. Brecheen. The citation is in the form prescribed by article 2022, R.S., except that the name of Mrs. Brecheen was not stated, the officer being commanded “to summon C. L. Brecheen and wife.”

The return upon the citation shows service upon “C. L. Brecheen and wife.” Judg'ment by default was rendered against “C. L. Brecheen and wife, Mrs. C. L. Bre-cheen.”

Article 2003, R.S., requires a petition to state the names of the parties. Article 2022, R.S., requires the citation to state the names of all the parties. The petition and citation in this case do not comply with these provisions of the statutes and are insufficient to support judgment by default against either of the defendants. Delaware Western Const. Co. v. Farmers’ & Merchants’ Nat. Bank, 33 Tex.Civ.App. 658, 77 S.W. 628; Higgins v. Shepard, 48 Tex.Civ.App. 365, 107 S.W. 79; Temple Lumber Co. v. McDaniel (Tex.Civ.App.) 24 S.W.(2d) 518.

Reversed and remanded.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01

                            CARDIOGENESIS CORPORATION
                      COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE(1)
                      (in thousands, except per share data)
                                   (unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Three Months Ended September 30      Nine Months Ended September 30
                                            -------------------------------      ------------------------------
                                                 1997              1996              1997               1996
                                               --------          --------          ---------          --------
<S>                                            <C>               <C>               <C>                <C>      
Weighted average common shares outstanding
     for the period                              12,039             7,708             12,008             3,853
Common equivalent shares pursuant to Staff                                                          
    Accounting Bulletin No. 83                       --             4,229                 --             4,229
                                               --------          --------          ---------          --------
Shares used in per share calculation             12,039            11,937             12,008             8,082
                                               ========          ========          =========          ========
Net loss                                       $ (5,099)         $ (1,893)         $ (12,409)         $ (5,654)
                                               ========          ========          =========          ========
Net loss per share                             $  (0.42)         $  (0.16)         $   (1.03)         $  (0.70)
                                               ========          ========          =========          ========
</TABLE>

----------

(1) There is no difference between primary and fully diluted net loss per share
    for all periods presented.


                                      -16-
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: February 25, 2016 107159

________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TYREE I. HANKERSON, Appellant.

________________________________ Calendar Date: January 19, 2016 Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Rose and Clark, JJ.

__________ Michael P. Graven, Owego, for appellant. Stephen K. Cornwell Jr., District Attorney, Binghamton (Kristen L. Grabowski of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Cawley, J.), rendered December 19, 2013, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of rape in the third degree. Defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to rape in the third degree as charged in a superior court information. Under the terms of the plea agreement, he was to be sentenced to six months in jail and 10 years of probation. By the time that he was sentenced, he had already served time in jail and County Court sentenced him only to the 10-year term of probation. Defendant appeals. Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record, however, we find at least one issue of-2- 107159

arguable merit pertaining to the voluntariness of defendant's guilty plea (see People v Swarts, 56 AD3d 947, 947 [2008]). Accordingly, without expressing an opinion on the ultimate merit of this issue, we grant counsel's application to be relieved of assignment and shall assign new counsel to address this issue and any others that the record may disclose (see People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633, 636 [2001]; People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]). Peters, P.J., Garry, Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shelby T. Brewer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc.







/s/ Shelby T. Brewer                                       DATE:  August 14, 2008

Dr. Shelby T. Brewer, Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Commodore Applied Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.











1
# Eiropas Savienības C 265A/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 265A |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 58. sējums2015. gada 13. augusts |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 265A

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

58. sējums2015. gada 13. augusts

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Atzinumi |
| | ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS |
| | Padome |
| 2015/C 265A/01 | Paziņojums par atcelšanu | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

V   Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Padome

2015/C 265A/01

Paziņojums par atcelšanu

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

V Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Padome

| 13.8.2015 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 265/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2015

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 265/1

---

PAZIŅOJUMS PAR ATCELŠANU

(2015/C 265 A/01)

Atlases procedūra CONS/AD/113:

| — | Direktors, Juridiskais dienests, 3. direktorāts (Ārējās attiecības), |
| --- | --- |

—

Direktors, Juridiskais dienests, 3. direktorāts (Ārējās attiecības),

par kuru Eiropas Savienības Oficiālajā Vēstnesī
   (1) bija ievietots paziņojums, ir atcelta.

---

(1)  OV C 119 A, 14.4.2015., 18. lpp.

---
#### PITTS v. STATE.

No. 19944.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 15, 1938.

*797Burch Downman, of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State. '

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is murder; penalty assessed at death.

It has been made known to this court by proper affidavit that the appellant died May 24, 1938, after having perfected his appeal. The death of the appellant deprives this court of jurisdiction of the appeal. It is therefore abated.
# C_2022255EN.01000201.xml

| 4.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10435 – REFRESCO GROUP / HANSA-HEEMANN)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 255/02)

On 24 January 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10435. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10435. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
----

----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                              |   |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                Robert W. Dunlap                                               |   |   |   |   |
| Robert                W. Dunlap                                                   |   |   |   |   |
| Chief                Executive Officer and Chief                Financial Officer |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                              |   |   |   |   |
| Date:               December 12, 2007                                        |   |   |   |   |

----

----
ACCEPTED 01-15-00950-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/18/2015 4:19:43 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK