alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         418,392
<SECURITIES>                                 3,011,957
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,549,070
<PP&E>                                         289,568
<DEPRECIATION>                                (78,347)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,897,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          334,874
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,022
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,557,722
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,897,618
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,497,080
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,381,339)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,381,339)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,381,339)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.48)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21

                              SPARTECH CORPORATION
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


Legal Entity               DBA                         Incorporation or
                                                       Organization

Atlas Alchem Plastics,     Spartech Plastics           Delaware
Inc.

TKM Plastics, LP           Spartech Plastics           Missouri

Franklin-Burlington        Spartech Vy-Cal             Delaware
Plastics, Inc.
                           Spartech Polycom

Alchem Plastics, Inc.      Spartech Plastics           Delaware

Alchem Plastics            Spartech Plastics           Georgia
Corporation

Anjac-Doron Plastics, Inc. Spartech Profiles           California

Spartech Polycom, Inc.     Spartech Polycom            Pennsylvania
                           Spartech Color

Spartech Polycom, S.A.S.   Spartech Polycom            France

PolyTech South, Inc.       Spartech Polycom            Delaware

UVTEC, L.P.                Spartech Polycom            Texas

Spartech Plastics, Inc.    Spartech Plastics           Delaware

Spartech Industries, Inc.  Spartech Industries         Delaware
                           Spartech Profiles

Spartech Canada, Inc.      Spartech Color              New Brunswick
                           Spartech Plastics
                           Spartech Profiles


Alshin Tire Corporation    Spartech Industries         California

Spartech Polycast, Inc.    Spartech Polycast           Delaware

Spartech Townsend, Inc.    Spartech Townsend           Delaware

Spartech Industries        Spartech Marine             Delaware
Florida, Inc.
Spartech de Mexico, S.A.   Spartech Plastics           Mexico
de C.V.                    Spartech Polycom
Polymer Extruded Products, Spartech PEP                New Jersey
Inc.
X-Core, LLC (86% owned)    Spartech Industries         California
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Vicente A. Menchaca v. Insurance Company of the State of 

Pennsylvania

Appellate case number: 01-18-01122-CV

Trial court case number: C-2017-04354

Trial court: 113th District Court of Harris County

Appellant Vicente A. Menchaca filed a motion for en banc reconsideration of this Court’s 

November 3, 2020 opinion. The motion for en banc reconsideration is denied. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack 

Acting for the Court

En Banc Court consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, Goodman, 

Landau, Hightower, Countiss, and Adams.

Date: December 17, 2020
EXHIBIT 31(a)

I, Thomas M. Patrick, certify that:

1)	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company;

2)	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3)	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4)	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5)	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: December 11, 2003

/s/ Thomas M. Patrick
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 285 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2015 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a penalty 

for knowingly selling advertising that offers certain commercial sex acts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 285 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Advertising Vic3 tims of Exploitation Act of 2015’’ or the ‘‘SAVE Act of 

4 2015’’. 

5 SEC. 2. ADVERTISING THAT OFFERS CERTAIN COMMER6 CIAL SEX ACTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1591 of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended in subsection (a)(1), by inserting 

9 after ‘‘obtains,’’ the following: ‘‘advertises,’’. 

10 (b) MENS REA REQUIREMENT.—Section 1591 of title 

11 18, United States Code, is amended in subsection (a), by 

12 inserting after ‘‘knowing, or’’ the following: ‘‘, except 

13 where, in an offense under paragraph (2), the act consti14 tuting the violation of paragraph (1) is advertising,’’. 

15 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 1591(b) 

16 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— 

17 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘or obtained’’ 

18 and inserting ‘‘obtained, or advertised’’; and 

19 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘or obtained’’ 

20 and inserting ‘‘obtained, or advertised’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 27, 

2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40598 

(Summary Calendar)

__________________

JUAN VEGA,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

J.T. HICKEY Et Al.,

 Defendants,

J.T. HICKEY,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(USDC No. C-93-CV-165)

- - - - - - - - - -

May 20, 1996

Before GARWOOD, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Vega appeals from a judgment for the defendant following

a jury verdict in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights suit. Because

Vega failed to move for a judgment as a matter of law, pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 50, the issue is reviewed for plain error only, and

this court will reverse only if the judgment complained of results
2

in a manifest miscarriage of justice. Phillips v. Frey, 20 F.3d

623, 627 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Vega presented no evidence at trial demonstrating "a policy or

custom which caused the constitutional deprivation." Colle v.

Brazos County, Tex., 981 F.2d 237, 244 (5th Cir. 1993) (citing

Brummett v. Camble, 946 F.2d 1178, 1182-83 (5th Cir. 1991)), cert.

denied, 504 U.S. 965 (1992). The evidence supported the verdict

that the defendant did not act with deliberate indifference to

Vega's serious medical needs as a pretrial detainee or a convicted

prisoner. See Hare v. City of Corinth, 74 F.3d 633, 643 (5th Cir.

1996) (holding that when a pretrial detainee bases his claim on a

jail official's "episodic acts or omissions," the standard of

subjective deliberate indifference enunciated in Farmer v. Brennan,

114 S. Ct. 1970, 1980 (1994), is the measure of culpability) (en

banc); Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976). 

AFFIRMED.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2949 

To exclude payments from State eugenics compensation programs from consideration in determining eligibility for, or the amount of, Federal public 

benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 7, 2015 

Mr. MCHENRY (for himself and Mr. BUTTERFIELD) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform 

A BILL 

To exclude payments from State eugenics compensation programs from consideration in determining eligibility for, 

or the amount of, Federal public benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Treatment of Certain 

5 Payments in Eugenics Compensation Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2949 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF PAYMENTS FROM STATE EUGENICS 

2 COMPENSATION PROGRAMS FROM CONSID3 ERATION IN DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY FOR, 

4 OR THE AMOUNT OF, FEDERAL PUBLIC BENE5 FITS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of law, payments made under a State eugenics com8 pensation program shall not be considered as income or 

9 resources in determining eligibility for, or the amount of, 

10 any Federal public benefit. 

11 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section: 

12 (1) FEDERAL PUBLIC BENEFIT.—The term 

13 ‘‘Federal public benefit’’ means— 

14 (A) any grant, contract, loan, professional 

15 license, or commercial license provided by an 

16 agency of the United States or by appropriated 

17 funds of the United States; and 

18 (B) any retirement, welfare, health, dis19 ability, public or assisted housing, postsec20 ondary education, food assistance, unemploy21 ment benefit, or any other similar benefit for 

22 which payments or assistance are provided to 

23 an individual, household, or family eligibility 

24 unit by an agency of the United States or by 

25 appropriated funds of the United States. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2949 IH

1 (2) STATE EUGENICS COMPENSATION PRO2 GRAM.—The term ‘‘State eugenics compensation 

3 program’’ means a program established by State law 

4 that is intended to compensate individuals who were 

5 sterilized under the authority of the State. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Zones, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
        for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Firoz H. Lalji, Chairman and
        Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1)           The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 
 (2)           The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
        August 13, 2007
 
 
 /S/   FIROZ
                  H LALJIFiroz
                  H. LaljiChairman
                  and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF APPLIED ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,774
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,290
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,100
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,852
<PP&E>                                          72,257
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,227
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,472
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,514
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,227
<SALES>                                         47,806
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,806
<CGS>                                           26,858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,572
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,058)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,322)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,736)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.39)


</TABLE>
|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |  |  |
| Delaware                                       | 0-17948 | 94-2838567 |
| (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation) | (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| o      | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|   |   |
| o      | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|   |   |
| o      | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |
| o      | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
|   |   | ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. |
|   |   |   |   |
| Dated: | May 20, 2015 | By: | /s/ Jacob J. Schatz |
|   |   |   | Jacob J. Schatz |
|   |   |   | Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
EXHIBIT 32.1



OVERSEAS SHIPHOLDING GROUP, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer of Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to the best of
his knowledge and belief, that the Form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2014 (the “Periodic
Report”) accompanying this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely for
purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to be used for any
other purpose.



|Date: March 23, 2015 | /s/ Ian T. Blackley    
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     | Ian T. Blackley        
|                     | Chief Executive Officer
|                     |                        
|Date: March 23, 2015 | /s/ Rick F. Oricchio   
|                     | Rick F. Oricchio       
|                     | Chief Financial Officer
ROBERT B. HAINES 

ATTORNEY AT LAW - - i • I'-'i-i'- '• 'J' ' 

• ; •• / ;i:r AT'M' . 0 

March 29, 2011 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: History Flight, Inc. - Exemption No. 9932 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0480 

U.S. Department of Transportation: 

Today I received the postcard Notice dated March 22, 2011, of renewal/expiration of the 

above Exemption. 

This is a request for renewal and extension of the Exemption which is due to expire on 

August 31, 2011. 

Please let me know if you need any additional information which is required by you to 

process this request for renewal and extension. 

Very truly yours, 

ROfeRT B. HATNES 

RBH/rmd 

cc: History Flight, Inc. 

Attn: Mark Noah 

248^ T.amingTon Road • Bcdminsrc-r, Ntrw Jersey 07921 • Tel: (90K) 234-0607 • Fax: (W8) 234-0669 • uAXAv.rbhamestaxlaw.com
**EXHIBIT 24.1**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

Peter A. Darbee, the undersigned, Director of PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation, hereby constitutes and appoints Thomas B.King as his attorney-in-fact with full power of substitution to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission in his capacity as Director of said corporation the Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2001, required bySection 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and any and all amendments and other filings or documents related thereto, and hereby ratifies all that said attorney-in-fact does or causes to be done by virtue hereof. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this document this 3rd dayof March, 2003. 

 

/s/    PETER A. DARBEE             

Peter A. Darbee 

 

**POWER OFATTORNEY**

 

Bruce R. Worthington, theundersigned, Director of PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation, hereby constitutes and appoints Thomas B. King as his attorney-in-fact with full power of substitution to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission in hiscapacity as Director of said corporation the Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2001, required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and any and all amendments and other filings or documents relatedthereto, and hereby ratifies all that said attorney-in-fact does or causes to be done by virtue hereof. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this document this 3rd day of March, 2003. 

 

/s/    BRUCE R. WORTHINGTON         

Bruce R. Worthington
SCWC-13-0005130

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

DANA E. VINCENT, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. JACQUELINE CLOUSE, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0005130; CIVIL NO. 10-1-2336) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee Dana E. Vincent’s Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on February 6, 2015, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, March 16, 2015. Randall L.K.M. Rosenberg Charles E. McKay and Moana A. Yost for petitioner Jonathan L. Ortiz and Wade J. Katano for respondent /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0005130 16-MAR-2015 11:14 AM
<PAGE> 1
                                                     Exhibit 10.6

AEtna             Interoffice          Mary Ann Champlin
                  Communication        Aetna Human Resources, RC3A
                                       (860) 273-8371
                                       Fax: (860) 560-8721



To         Ronald E. Compton

Date       July 22, 1996

Subject    EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

I am pleased to inform you that effective July 19, 1996, Aetna 
Inc. has assumed all of the obligations of Aetna Services, Inc. 
(formerly Aetna Life and Casualty Company) under your Employment 
Agreement with Aetna Services, Inc.  All references to the 
"Company" in your Employment Agreement will hereinafter be deemed 
to mean both Aetna Services, Inc. and Aetna Inc.  Among other 
things, this means that the Change in Control provisions of your 
Employment Agreement would be triggered by a change in control of 
either Aetna Services, Inc. or Aetna Inc.

By way of background, Aetna Inc. became the ultimate parent within 
the Aetna holding company system as a result of the merger with 
U.S. Healthcare.  Your Employment Agreement was entered into with 
Aetna Services, Inc., which is now a direct subsidiary of Aetna 
Inc.  We felt it would be appropriate for the new ultimate parent, 
Aetna Inc., to assume these obligations to place you on an 
equivalent footing post-merger.

The assumption of your Employment Agreement is self-executing.  
You do not need to take any action in response to this letter.  If 
you have any questions or concerns, please let me know.




                                             /s/ Mary Ann Champlin