alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99-B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Otter Tail Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin G. Moug,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                           /s/ Kevin G. Moug
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Kevin G. Moug
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                           March 26, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Otter Tail Corporation and will be retained by Otter Tail
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 11.1


                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Three Months Ended
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 March 31, 1998  March 31, 1997
<S>                                              <C>             <C>
Net income (in thousands)                              $1,960          $1,046
                                                 ==============================
                                                
Weighted average common shares outstanding         10,397,714       8,286,846
                                                 ==============================
Basic income per share                                  $0.19           $0.13
                                                 ==============================
Dilutive effect of options and warrants
outstanding under treasury-stock method             1,325,296       1,212,082
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                   11,723,010       9,498,928
                                                 ==============================
Diluted income per share                                $0.17           $0.11
                                                 ==============================
</TABLE>







                                     -E-1-
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2928 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 201 B Street in Perryville, Arkansas, as the 

‘‘Harold George Bennett Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2928 EH

1 SECTION 1. HAROLD GEORGE BENNETT POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 201 B Street in Perryville, Ar4 kansas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Harold 

5 George Bennett Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Harold George Ben10 nett Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 18, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2928 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice’’. Arkansas, as the ‘‘Harold George Bennett Post al Service located at 201 B Street in Perryville,
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                               GUARANTY SUPPLEMENT

      Each of the undersigned hereby agrees to be bound as a Guarantor for
purposes of the Guaranty, dated as of June 29, 2004 (the "Guaranty"), among
GUARDIAN ASSETS, INC. and certain other Subsidiaries of AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.
from time to time party thereto as Guarantors and acknowledged by CITICORP NORTH
AMERICA, INC., as Administrative Agent, and each of the undersigned hereby
acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Guaranty and the Credit Agreement. Each of
the undersigned hereby represents and warrants that each of the representations
and warranties contained in Section 16 (Representations and Warranties;
Covenants) of the Guaranty applicable to it is true and correct on and as the
date hereof as if made on and as of such date. Capitalized terms used herein but
not defined herein are used with the meanings given them in the Guaranty.

               [THE REST OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Guaranty Supplement to
be duly executed and delivered as of October 27, 2004.

                                        UNITIVE, INC.

                                        By: /s/ ARTHUR BERGENS
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Name:  Arthur Bergens
                                            Title: Chief Financial Officer

                                        UNITIVE ELECTRONICS, INC.

                                        By: /s/ ARTHUR BERGENS
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Name:  Arthur Bergens
                                            Title: Chief Financial Officer

                    [SIGNATURE PAGE TO GUARANTY SUPPLEMENT]
<PAGE>

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED
as of the date first above written:

CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC.
as Administrative Agent

By: /s/ ASGHAR ALI
    -------------------------
Name:  Asghar Ali
Title: Vice President

                    [SIGNATURE PAGE TO GUARANTY SUPPLEMENT]
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 12

- 00021

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF BIL LY JACK MOTT, DECEAS ED

,

From the County Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. P17905

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Susan Slovak, has filed a motion for voluntary dismissal of her appeal

in this matter. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). Dismissal of this appeal would not prevent

a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. The motion is

granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis , and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted; appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed May 23, 2012

[CV06]
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-20037 and
33-68128) and in the Prospectuses on Form S-3 included therein of Moore Medical
Corp. of our report dated April 14, 1997, appearing on page 12 of this Form
10-K. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Prospectuses.

Price Waterhouse LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
April 14, 1997

                                       40
#### Settos, Appellee, *v.*Springfield, Ohio, Local No. 352, International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees & Moving Picture Machine Operators of United States and Canada, et al., Appellants.

(No. 28380

Decided February 26, 1941.)

*Mr. Samuel A. Bowman,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Keifer é Keifer, Mr. Charles*if. *Elston, Mr.*
      *41
      *Arthur H. Fix*and *Mr. Joseph A. Padway,*for appellants.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Bettman, J., not participating.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2880 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2880

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To redesignate the Martin Luther King, Junior, National Historic Site 
            in the State of Georgia, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Martin Luther King, Jr. National 
Historical Park Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

    The Act entitled ``An Act to establish the Martin Luther King, 
Junior, National Historic Site in the State of Georgia, and for other 
purposes'' (Public Law 96-428) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) of the first section, by striking 
        ``the map entitled `Martin Luther King, Junior, National 
        Historic Site Boundary Map', number 489/80,013B, and dated 
        September 1992'' and inserting ``the map entitled `Martin 
        Luther King, Jr. National Historical Park Proposed Boundary 
        Revision', numbered 489/128,786 and dated June 2015'';
            (2) by striking ``Martin Luther King, Junior, National 
        Historic Site'' each place it appears and inserting ``Martin 
        Luther King, Jr. National Historical Park'';
            (3) by striking ``national historic site'' each place it 
        appears and inserting ``national historical park'';
            (4) by striking ``historic site'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``historical park''; and
            (5) by striking ``historic sites'' in section 2(a) and 
        inserting ``historical parks''.

SEC. 3. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law (other than this Act), map, regulation, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to ``Martin 
Luther King, Junior, National Historic Site'' shall be deemed to be a 
reference to ``Martin Luther King, Jr. National Historical Park''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 24, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2880

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To redesignate the Martin Luther King, Junior, National Historic Site 
            in the State of Georgia, and for other purposes.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1273

HALLIE N. STONE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SULLIVAN’S AUTO BODY, (Trading as) its assignees, and for successors in interest; RICHARD

L. SULLIVAN, JR., Owner, individually in his

private capacity; JOHN RICE, Manager,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-483-A)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 21, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hallie N. Stone, Appellant Pro Se. Richard L. Sullivan, Jr., John

Rice, Fredericksburg, Virginia, Appellees; Mary Gillen Fenske, KALBAUGH, PFUND & MESSERSMITH, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Hallie N. Stone appeals the district court’s orders (1) dismissing her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, (2)

denying her motion for reconsideration and to amend her complaint,

(3) denying her motion for “a rule to show cause why [the Defendants’ attorney] should not be held in criminal contempt.” Our

review of the record and the district court’s opinions discloses no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Stone v. Sullivan’s Auto Body, No. CA-97-483-A

(E.D. Va. Dec. 5, 1997; Jan. 9 & Jan. 16, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
January 6, 2012

Mr. Jean-Pierre Harrison 11835 Skyline Boulevard Los Gatos, CA 95033

Dear Mr. Harrison:

We have reviewed your letter dated July 6, 2011 resubmitting a petition for the amendment of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) § 91.119(d). Specifically, you recommended “replacing (the term) helicopter with rotorcraft, thus extending the waiver of minimum altitude requirements to gyroplanes and gyrodynes.” Although your supporting documentation was taken into consideration, the regulatory guidelines of part 11 preclude the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) from taking any action at this time.

As indicated in our response to you dated December 15, 2010, the FAA responds to petitions for rulemaking by following the guidelines set forth in part 11, specifically § 11.73. As stated in that section, the FAA uses the following criteria when making a decision to amend current regulations based on a petition for rulemaking:

1. The immediacy of the safety or security concerns the petition raises;

2. The priority of other issues the FAA must deal with; and

3. The resources we have available to address the issues.

Broadening § 91.119(d) to include the aircraft category “rotorcraft” would not address an immediate safety or security concern. Additionally, your petition cannot be addressed because of other priorities and resource constraints. Therefore, we are unable to consider your petition at this time in accordance with § 11.73. Please keep in mind that your comments and arguments for a rule change will be consider in future rulemaking.

Sincerely,

John M. Allen Director, Flight Standards Service
hoi'b^r^ mi-xt^:u 

•i^PARTMEMTOF 

PORTATION 

i 1 

:.^;tT OPERATIONS 

i m AUG ?i i p h l b 

August 19, 2010 

To Whom It May Concern: 

Cape Air has been an active member of the Greater Watertown North Country Chamber of 

Commerce for the last two years. Cape Air has both sponsored and attended many of our events 

including Business After Hours and annual dinners. They have also made use of a variety of 

advertising opportunities within our Chamber including our directory, monthly newsletter, and prize 

donations made to our events. 

Please feel free to contact me with any questions. 

Respectfully, 

Michelle A. Farrell 

Director of Events 

1241 CO M KI-:N S I Kil l \V\rh;Ric)\\N \K\ V VDK K 13601 

\K\-. 315.788.4400 FAX: 315.788.3369 

V\\V\V.\\.\ I I KrOVVINNV.t () M < II \MUI;R( « VV A IKK I OWNNV.CO M
# C_2022130EN.01001401.xml

| 23.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/14

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 130/12)

Decision partially granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2022) 1500 | 16 March 2022 | Pitch, coal tar, high-temp. (‘CTPht’)
  EC No: 266-028-2, CAS No: 65996-93-2 | Bilbaina de Alquitranes, S.A., Obispo Olaechea 49, 48903, Luchana-Baracaldo, Vizcaya, Spain | REACH/22/12/0 | Use of CTPht in formulation of mixtures exclusively for industrial uses that are outside the scope of the authorisation requirement set out in Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 | 4 October 2032 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the uses of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |
| Anthracene oil (‘AO’)
  EC No: 292-602-7, CAS No: 90640-80-5 | REACH/22/12/1 | Use of AO in formulation of mixtures exclusively for industrial uses that are outside the scope of the authorisation requirement set out in Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2022) 1500

16 March 2022

Pitch, coal tar, high-temp. (‘CTPht’)

EC No: 266-028-2, CAS No: 65996-93-2

Bilbaina de Alquitranes, S.A., Obispo Olaechea 49, 48903, Luchana-Baracaldo, Vizcaya, Spain

REACH/22/12/0

Use of CTPht in formulation of mixtures exclusively for industrial uses that are outside the scope of the authorisation requirement set out in Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006

4 October 2032

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the uses of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

Anthracene oil (‘AO’)

EC No: 292-602-7, CAS No: 90640-80-5

REACH/22/12/1

Use of AO in formulation of mixtures exclusively for industrial uses that are outside the scope of the authorisation requirement set out in Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).

---
#### McKINNEY v. STATE.

No. 18676.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 9, 1936.

State’s Rehearing Denied Jan. 13, 1937.

Kirby, King & Overshiner, of Abilene, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

Conviction for a misdemeanor; punishment being assessed at a fine of $200 and confinement in jail for 60 days.

The complaint and information embrace two counts. Omitting the formal parts, the first counts read as follows: “R. L. McKinney * * * did then and there unlawfully sell ■ to J. W. Coats spirituous liquor containing alcohol in excess of one-half of one per centum by volume, the sale of such liquor in said Taylor County, Texas, having been theretofore, and was then prohibited in said Taylor County, Texas, by the laws of said state.”

The second counts contain the same averments as the first counts, except that it is alleged that the liquor was. sold to Porter Williams.

It is not sufficiently alleged in either count thaf the sale of intoxicating liquor had been prohibited in Taylor county. We quote from Jack Kelly v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 98 S.W.(2d) 998, delivered November 18, 1936: "There are three things which must occur before the sale of intoxicating liquor can be prohibited under the Local Option Law (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 32 et seq.) : First, an election to determine whether the sale shall be prohibited must be held under an order of the commissioners’ court for that purpose. Second, after the election is held, the commissioners’ court must canvass the election returns and declare the result. Third, the result must be published *359as required by the law in force at the time of the election. Until these three things are done, there is no law prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquor in the county or district. It therefore follows that these things must he averred in the information to show that the sale of intoxicating liquor had been prohibited.”

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commis-' sion of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

WI

- FI ONE, LLC, Appellant

v.

BROADCOM CORPORATION
, Appellee

______________________

2015

- 1946

______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013

- 00636.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

D OUGLAS A ARON C AWLEY , McKool Smith, PC , Dallas, TX argued for appellant. Also represented by D ONALD P UCKETT , Nelson Bumgardner PC, Fort Worth, TX ; P ETER J. A YERS , Lee & Hayes, PLLC, Austin, TX.

D OMINIC E. M ASSA , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also repr esented by K ATIE S AXTON , K EVIN G OLDMAN , Z ACHARY P ICCOLOMINI

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK , B RYSON , and R EYNA , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Ci r. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

September 16, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

US Pan American Solutions, LLC ) ASBCA No. 62629

)

Under Contract No. W911S2-19-P-2528 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Jorge DelPino

 President

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott N. Flesch, Esq.

 Army Chief Trial Attorney

MAJ Aaron McCartney, JA

CPT Timothy M. McLister, JA

 Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: May 26, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62629, Appeal of US Pan American 

Solutions, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: May 26, 2022

LAURA EYESTER

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals