## NO . 1 2 -0 8 -0 0 0 4 2 -CR IN TH E CO URT O F APPEALS TWELFTH C OU RT O F APPEALS DISTRIC T

TYLER, TEXA S

TI M O TH Y R A Y LYDI A , § A PPE A L F R OM TH E7 TH APP ELL AN T V. § JUDI CI AL DI ST RI CT COU RT OF THESTA TE O FTEX

A S, AP P ELLEE § SMITH COUNT Y

, T EXAS M EM OR AN DUM OPINI ON P ER CURI AM T i m o t h y Ra y L y di a appea l s h i s co n

v i ct i o n f o r aggr av at ed ro b b ery . A ppel l an t ’ s co un s el

f i l ed a br i e f i n c o m p l i anc e w i

t h A nde r s v . Ca lifo r nia , 386 U.S
. 738, 87 S. Ct
. 1396 , 1 8 L
. E d
. 2d 493 (1967) , an d Ga ino us v

. State , 4 3 6 S
. W
. 2 d

1 3 7 ( T e x . C r im. A

p p . 1 9 6 9 )
. W e a ffir m. B ACKG ROUND A ppel l an t pl eade d gu i l t y

t o aggrav at ed ro b b ery . A ppel l an t al s o pl eade d t rue t o an e nhanc e m e nt p ar a g r a

p h, w hi c h r e l a t e d

t o a p r e vi o u s f

e l o ny c o m m i t t e d by Ap p e l l ant
. T he r e w a s no agreem en t b et wee n A

ppel l an t an d t h e St at e as t o t h e appro pri at e pun i s h men t f o r t h e ch arged o f

f en s e. T h e t r i a l c o u r t f

o u n d A p p e l l an t g u i l t y an d a s s e s s e d A

p p e l l an t ’ s p un i s h

me n t a t f i f t y ye ar s of i m pri s o n men t an d a $5,000 f

i n e. T h i s appea l

f o l l o wed. A N A L Y SIS P URS UANT TO A N D E R S V . C A LI F O R N IA Ap p e l l ant ’s c o u ns e l

f i l e d a br i e f i n c o m p l i anc e w i

t h Ander s v. Calif or nia an d G

a i n o u s v. Sta te . T h e b r i e f

s ho w s t ha t Ap p e l l ant ’s c o uns e l d i l i g e nt l y r e vi e w e d

t he a p p e l l a t e r e c o r d

and co n s i dered t h e appl i cab l e l aw an d i s o f t h e o pi n i o n t h at t h e reco rd r ef

l ect s n o rev ersi

b l e erro r an d t h at t he r e i s no e r r o ru

p o n w hi c h an a

p p e a l c an be p r e d i c a t e d
. I n c o m p l i a nc e w i t h And ers , Ga ino us , andC o u n s e l f o r Ap p e ll ant c e r ti f

ie din h is b r ie f

that h e p r o v id e dAp p e ll ant w it h a c o p y o f the b r ie f
. 1 A p p el l a n t wa s g i ven t i m e t o fi l e h i s own br i ef i n t h i s ca u s e. T h e t i m e for fi l i n g s u ch a br i ef h a s ex p i r ed a n dwe h a ve r ec ei ved n o p r o s e br i ef. 2 Hig h v. S t a te , 57 3 S
. W
. 2d80 7 ( T ex . Cr i m . A pp . 19 78 ) , A

pp el l an t ’s co un sel ’s b r i ef

pr esen t s a chr o n o l o g i ca l

su m mat i o n o f t h e p r o ce d

ur al h i st o ry o f t h e c a s e a n d fur t h er st at es t h at A p p el l ant ’s c ou n s e l i s u n a b l e to r a i s e an

y ar g u a b l e i s s u e s f

ora p p e a l
. W e h av e l i

k e w i s e e x am

i n e d th e r e c or d

f or 1 re v e rs i b l e e rror an d h av e f

o u n d n o n e . See B le ds oe

v . State , 1 7 8 S
. W
. 3 d 8 2 4 , 8 2 6
- 2 7 ( T e x . C r im. A p p . 2 0 0 5 ). C ONCLUS I ON A s r e qu i r e d b y Sta

ffor d v . State , 8 1 3 S
. W
. 2 d

5 0 3 ( T ex. Cr i

m . A p p . 1 9 9 1 ) , A

p p el l ant ’s c oun s e l h a s mov e d

f or l e av e to w i

th dr aw i n th i s c a s e . W e c arr i e d th e m oti on f or c on s i d e r a ti on

w i th t he me r i t s . H avi ng d o ne s o and

f i nd i ng no r e ve r s i

bl e e rr o r , Ap p e l l ant ’s c o uns e l ’s mo t i o n f o rl e ave t o wi t h dr aw i s h er eb y

gr an t ed and t h e t r i al

co ur t ’s j ud gm en

t i s aff irm ed
. Opi n i o n del i v ered F eb ruar y

4, 2009. Pa n el co n s is te d

o f W o r th en , C .J. , G r if fi th , J ., a n d H o yl e, J.

(DO NOT P UB L IS H)

## CO URT O F APPEALS

TW ELF TH CO URT O F AP PE ALS DI STRI CT O F T EXAS



## J UDG M ENT

F EBRUARY 4, 2009 

### NO . 12- 08- 0004 2- CR
TI M OTHY RA Y L YDI A, Ap p e l l ant V. T HE ST AT E OF T E XA S, A ppel l ee A p p e a l f rom t h e 7 t h J u d i c i a l D i s t ri c t C o urt o f Sm i t h Co un t y , T ex as . (T r. Ct
. No
. 007-1167- 07) T H I S C AU S E c ame t o be he ar d o n t he a p p e l l a t e r e c o r d and

br i e f s f i l e d he r e i n,
an d th e s ame b e i

n g c on s i d e r e d , i

t i s th e op i

n i on of th i s c our t th a t th e r e w a s n o e rr or i n th e j u d g me n

t. I t i s t he r e f

o r e O RD E RE D , AD JU D G E D , and D E C RE E D t ha t t he j u d g me nt
o f t h e co urt b el o w B E I N A LL T H IN G S A FFIR M ED , A p p e l l an t’ s c oun s e l ’ s m

oti on f or l e av e to
w it h dr aw is h e r e b y G RANTED ; an d t h at t h i s deci s i o n b e cert i f i ed t o t h e co urt b el o w f

o r o b s erv an ce. B y per cur iam o p i

no n. Pa n el co n s is te d

o f W o r th en , C .J. , G r if fi th , J ., a n d H o yl e, J.

# TH E S TATE OF TE XAS

M A N D AT E

*********************************************

T O T HE 7T H JU DI CI AL DI ST RI CT CO UR T OF SM I T H C OU NT Y, GRE E T I NG S: Be f o re o ur Co urt o f A

ppeal s f o r t h e 12t h Co urt o f A

ppeal s Di s t ri ct o f T ex as , o n t h e 4t h day o f F eb ruar y , 2009, t h e ca

us e upo n appea l t o rev i s e o r r ev erse yo ur j udgmen t b et wee n T I M OT HYRA Y L YD I A, A ppe l l ant NO. 12-08- 00042-CR; Trial Cour t No. 007-1167- 07 B y per cur iam o p i

ni o n. THE STAT E OF TE XAS, Appel l ee was det er m

i n ed; an d t h er ei

n o ursai d Co ur t made it s o r der i n t h ese wo r ds:

“ T H I S C A

U S E c ame t o b e h e ar d

o n t h e a p p e llat e r e c o r d

an d b r ie fs file d

h e r e in , an d

t h e s ame b e i n g i n s p e c te d , i

t i s th e op i

n i on of th i s c our t th a t th e r e w a s n o e rr or i n th e j u d g me n

t. It i s t h e re f

o re O RD ERED , AD JU D G ED , and DE C REED t h a t t h e j u d g me n t o f t h e c o u rt b el o w B E I N A LL T H IN G S A FFIR M ED , Ap p e l l ant ’s c o uns e l ’s mo t i o n f o r l e ave t o w i

t hdr aw i s he r e by G RANTED ; an d

t h a t t h i s d e c i s i o n

b e c e rt i f i e d t o t h e c o urt b e l o w f

o r ob s e rv an c e .” WHE RE AS, WE CO M M AN D Y OU to ob s e r v e th e or d e rof ou rs a i d C our t of A p p e a l s f or t h e Twel f t h Co urt o f A ppeal s Di s t ri ct o f

T ex as i n t h i s b eh al f

, an d i n al l t h i n gs h av e i t dul y reco gn ized, o b ey ed, an d ex ecut ed. WITNES S , THE HO NO RAB LE JAM ES T. WO RTHEN , C h i e f J u s ti c e of ourC our t of A p p e a l s f o r t h e Tw e l f

t h C o u rt o f A p p e a l s D i s t ri c t , w i

t h t h e Se a l t h e re o f a f

f i x e d , a t t h e C i

t y o f Ty l e r, t h i s t h e ______ day

o f __________________, 200____.

CA T HY S
. LUSK , CLERK By :_______________________________ D e p u t y

C l e rk