alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                             363
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,729
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     99,874
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,804
<PP&E>                                          91,957
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,999
<BONDS>                                         35,953
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,830
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148,350
<SALES>                                        342,609
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               342,609
<CGS>                                          224,620
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,264
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,711
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,371
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,001)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,372
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (1,299)
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,073
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.85
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JAMES EDWARD TERRY

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 346

[ April 23, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Caroline C. Shepherd

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502014CF009348AXXXMB

.

James Edward Terry, Pahokee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J

., M AY and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of RadiSys Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian Bronson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 15, 2011





/s/ Brian Bronson


Brian Bronson


Chief Financial Officer
1... See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-254-CV

IN RE ANTHONY DEWAYNE WALTERS RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is

of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for

writ of mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL B: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ. 

DELIVERED: June 20, 2008
# C_2022367EN.01000101.xml

| 26.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10850 – ASMENT DE TEMARA / VEOM / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 367/01)

On 7 September 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10850. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10850. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

' 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Boeing Results of ADF review April12, ' 15 ADF errors were cited in 

~'oe,\ the memo which was sent 

to Boeing. 

A4A "fttrlke-Ireland June 10, '15 Planned AD action 

Other/Additional Information:
# Appendix 9: HYSPLIT Trajectories for 

# Miscellaneous Monitors and CountiesFigure 9A - 1 South Carroll (AQS ID No. 240130001) all Days 2006 to 2007Figure 9A - 2 Southern Maryland (AQS ID No. 240170010)

Select Days 2006 to 2007 and Calvert Co. (2400900011) Select Days 2006 to 2010Figure 9A - 3 . Back - Trajectories from Certain Violating Monitors in the Washington CBSA Crossing Clarke, Culpeper, Fauquier, Warren in Virginia, of Jefferson and Hampshire in West Virginia, and the Frederick County Area DC areaFigure 9A - 4 . Back - Trajectories from Certain Violating Monitors in the Baltimore CBSA Crossing Clarke, Culpeper, Fauquier, Warren in Virginia, of Jefferson and Hampshire in West Virginia, and the Frederick County Area DC areaFigure 9A - 5 . Back - Trajectories from Certain Violating Monitors in the Washington CBSA Crossing St. Mary’s CountyFigure 9A - 6 . Back - Trajectories from Certain Violating Monitors in the Baltimore CBSA Crossing St. Mary’s CountyFigure 9A - 7 . Back - Trajectories from Certain Violating Monitors in the Baltimore CBSA Crossing Queen Anne’s CountyFigure 9A - 8 . Back - Trajectories from Certain Violating Monitors in the Washington CBSA Crossing Queen Anne’s CountyFigure 9A - 9 . Back - Trajectories from Certain Violating Monitors – Franconia, Fairfax Co. and

Arlington, Arlington County – Crossing the Fredericksburg, VA AreaFigure 9A - 10 . Back - Trajectories from Certain Violating Monitors – in Prince George’s County, MD

and the District of Columbia – Crossing the Fredericksburg, VA AreaFigure 9A - 11 . Back - Trajectories from Certain Violating Monitors in the Baltimore CBSA Crossing the Fredericksburg, VA Area
#### BRICE v. STATE.

No. 18040.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 18, 1936.

*254Art Schlofman, of Dalhart, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Since the conviction of the appellant, the law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended) upon which the prosecution is founded has been repealed (Vernon’s Ann. P.C. art. 666—49). See Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 21**

**P&F INDUSTRIES,INC.**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THEREGISTRANT**

**Continental ToolGroup, Inc., a Delaware Corporation**

Hy-TechMachine, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

**CountrywideHardware, Inc., a Delaware Corporation**

Nationwide Industries, Inc., a Florida Corporation

Woodmark International L.P., a Delaware LimitedPartnership

d/b/a Stair House

PacificStair Products, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

**Embassy Industries, Inc.,a New York Corporation**

**Florida PneumaticManufacturing Corporation, a Florida Corporation**

d/b/a                    UniversalToolPipemasterBerkley ToolFranklin Manufacturing

**Green Manufacturing, Inc.a Delaware Corporation**

**WILP Holdings, Inc.,a Delaware Corporation**

----
# C_2022314EN.01000101.xml

| 18.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10801 – INFRAFIBRE / DG FIBRE / DGN)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 314/01)

On 10 August 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10801. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10801. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of SCPIE Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: August 4, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald J. Zuk      
|                      |  |  |  | Donald J. Zuk          
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23(c)



                       [MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. LETTERHEAD]





                        CONSENT OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.

As oil and gas consultants, we hereby consent to the use of our name and our
report dated November 5, 2004 in this Form 10-K, incorporated by reference into
Peoples Energy Corporation's previously filed Registration Statement File Nos.
333-84594 and 333-70702 on Form S-3, and 2-82760, 33-6369, 033-63193, 333-62070,
333-113204 and 333-116192 on Form S-8.

                                                   MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.

                                                   By /s/ Christopher A. Butta
                                                      --------------------------

                                                   Christopher A. Butta

                                                   Senior Vice President



Houston, Texas
December 14, 2004
#### HIGHTOWER v. KELLAM et al.

No. 10462.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

June 22, 1938.

Frank M. Kemp, J. M. Wilson, and Kleberg, Eckhardt & Lowe, all of Corpus' Christi, for appellant.

Butler & Grimes, of Robstown, for ap-pellees.

SMITH, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Nueces County, sustaining a general demurrer and a certain special exception to appellant’s statement of the grounds of his contest of a special election held in the City of Robstown, Texas, upon the question of whether or not certain revenue bonds should be issued.

We are confronted, at the threshold of this case, .with the fact that the judgment attempted to be appealed from is not a final judgment. Said order reads in part, as follows:

> “It is therefore considered by the Court that such demurrer and exception be sustained, and that the defendant recover of the plaintiff the costs, for which he may have his execution; to which ruling of the Court the plaintiff then and there excepted in open court, and gave notice of appeal to the Fourth Court of Civil Appeals of the Supreme Judicial District at San Antonio, Texas.”

The mere sustaining of a general demurrer, in the absence of a further order denying the relief sought, or dismissing the case, is not a final judgment, and hence not an appealable' order. Secrest v. Ledbetter, Tex.Civ.App., 106 S.W.2d 740; Dixon v. Sanderson, Tex.Sup., 6 S.W. 831; Texas Land & Loan Co. v. Winter, 93 Tex. 560, 57 S.W. 39; Kuehn v. Kuehn, Tex.Com.App., 242 S.W. 719; Saffle v. Jones County, Tex.Civ.App., 5 S.W.2d 185; Johnson v. Sunset Stores, Tex.Civ.App., 27 S.W.2d 644, 648; Stratton v. Thompson, Tex.Civ.App., 18 S.W.2d 820; Brock v. Kelley, Tex.Civ.App., 85 S.W.2d 274.

In the absence of a final judgment, this Court' is without jurisdiction to hear and determine an appeal. It is, moreover, our duty to dismiss the appeal upon our own motion when the record discloses that we have no jurisdiction. Secrest v. Ledbetter, supra; Kosse National Bank v. Derden, Tex.Civ.App., 36 S.W.2d 295; *658Dodd v. Daniel, Tex.Civ.App., 89 S.W.2d 494.

It is accordingly ordered that this appeal be, and same is, dismissed.
Exhibit 4.76



 Exhibit 4.76 
 CONFIRMATION OF ASSUMPTION 
 This CONFIRMATION OF ASSUMPTION (this “Confirmation”)
is made as of the 28th day of July, 2008 by XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Holdings”). 
 WHEREAS, Holdings, Sirius Satellite Radio Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Sirius”), and Vernon Merger Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Sirius (“Vernon”) are parties
to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 19, 2007, pursuant to which Vernon merged with and into Holdings on the date hereof (the “Merger”); and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Guaranty, dated as of February 13, 2007 (the “Guaranty”), by Holdings, XM Radio
Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings, and XM Equipment Leasing, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings (each a “Guarantor”), the successor entity to a
merger involving a Guarantor is required to expressly assume in writing the due and punctual payment of all obligations of such Guarantor under the Guaranty. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in the Guaranty and hereinafter set forth, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Holdings,
intending to be legally bound, hereby agrees as follows: 
 1. Holdings, as the surviving entity in the Merger, hereby acknowledges and
confirms that the Guaranty continues to remain fully binding and enforceable against Holdings, and (for the avoidance of doubt) effective as of the consummation of the Merger unconditionally and irrevocably assumes the due and punctual payment and
performance of all obligations of Holdings under the Guaranty. 
 2. This Confirmation shall be governed by, and construed in accordance
with, the laws of the State of New York. 
  

			
	XM SATELLITE RADIO HOLDINGS INC.
		
	By:	 	 Joseph M. Titlebaum

	Name:	 	Joseph M. Titlebaum
	Title:	 	General Counsel and Secretary
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 11, 2018

No. 04-18-00131-CV

Lorraine KENYON, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Theodore Kenyon,

Appellants

v.

ELEPHANT INSURANCE COMPANY, LLC,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CI14055

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The notification of late record filed by the court reporter responsible for preparing the 

reporter’s record in this appeal is NOTED. The reporter’s record must be filed no later than July 

13, 2018.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of July, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

       
<CAPTION>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR
<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,181,452
<SECURITIES>                                   998,569
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,218,056
<PP&E>                                         146,738
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (43,808)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,524,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          128,327
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           295
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,395,737
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,524,064
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,256
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               455,508
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (445,252)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (445,252)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.15)

        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FILM ROMAN, INC., AS OF AND FOR THE THREE
MONTH AND NINE MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      15,428,605              15,428,605
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,857,799               3,857,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                 19,711,792              19,711,792
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,527,826               1,527,826
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,103,902               1,103,902
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,859,140              39,859,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        84,548                  84,548
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,305,684              36,305,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,859,140              39,859,140
<SALES>                                     10,475,613              29,717,115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,475,613              29,717,115
<CGS>                                       12,712,838              30,643,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,712,838              30,643,694
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,142,930               3,318,752
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             185,026                 449,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,195,129)             (3,795,413)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,195,129)             (3,795,413)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,195,129)             (3,795,413)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.38)                  (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>