Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 19495 

excluding section 4.4 (‘‘Contingency 

Reductions’’). 

[FR Doc. 2016–07668 Filed 4–4–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0028; FRL–9944–56– 

Region 9] 

Approval of Air Plan Revisions; 

Arizona; Rescissions and Corrections 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Partial withdrawal of direct 

final rule. 

SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of adverse 

comments, the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) is withdrawing 

a portion of the February 11, 2016 direct 

final rule approving certain revisions to 

the Arizona State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) and correcting certain errors. The 

adverse comments relate to a particular 

test method and thus the EPA is 

withdrawing the portion of the direct 

final rule that relates to the test methods 

that include the test method for which 

the adverse comments were received. 

DATES: The addition of paragraph 

(c)(29)(i)(B) published on February 11, 

2016 at 81 FR 7214 is withdrawn, 

effective April 5, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew Steckel, EPA Region IX, (415) 

947–4115, steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

February 11, 2016, the EPA published a 

direct final rule approving a SIP 

revision submitted by the Arizona 

Department of Environmental Quality 

(ADEQ). In the February 11, 2016 direct 

final rule, the EPA also corrected certain 

errors in previous actions on prior 

revisions to the Arizona SIP and to 

make certain other corrections. In the 

direct final rule, the EPA stated that if 

adverse comments were received by 

March 14, 2016, the EPA would publish 

a timely withdrawal and address the 

comments in a subsequent final rule 

based on the proposed rule also 

published on February 11, 2016 (81 FR 

7259). The February 11, 2016 proposed 

rule indicated that if the EPA receives 

adverse comment on an amendment, 

paragraph, or section of the direct final 

rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

the EPA may adopt as final those 

provisions of the rule that are not the 

subject of an adverse comment. 

In this instance, the EPA received 

adverse comments on a certain test 

method for which the EPA had 

approved rescission. The relevant test 

method was included in a SIP revision 

submitted by ADEQ on January 23, 1979 

that also included a number of other test 

methods and certain performance test 

specifications, all of which were 

approved by the EPA at 47 FR 17483 

(April 23, 1982). The EPA’s approval of 

the test methods and performance test 

specifications submitted on January 23, 

1979 and approved on April 23, 1982 

was codified at 40 CFR 

52.120(c)(29)(i)(A). 

The EPA’s action on the rescission of 

the test methods and performance test 

specifications submitted on January 23, 

1979 and approved on April 23, 1982 is 

severable from the rest of the direct final 

rule. Thus, the EPA is withdrawing only 

the portion of the direct final rule 

related to those test methods and 

performance test specifications. The 

EPA will address the comments in a 

separate final action covering the state’s 

rescission of the test methods and 

performance test specifications 

submitted on January 23, 1979 (and 

approved on April 23, 1982) based on 

the proposed action published on 

February 11, 2016 (81 FR 7259). The 

EPA will not open a second comment 

period for the action on the state’s 

rescissions of the test methods and 

performance test specifications. The 

other actions in the February 11, 2016 

Federal Register direct final rule are not 

affected. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

Dated: March 24, 2016. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

Accordingly, the addition of 

paragraph (c)(29)(i)(B) which was 

published in the Federal Register on 

February 11, 2016 (81 FR 7209) on page 

7214 is withdrawn as of April 5, 2016. 

[FR Doc. 2016–07666 Filed 4–4–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2015–0696; FRL–9944–55- 

Region 4] 

Air Plan Approval; South Carolina; 

Transportation Conformity Update 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking direct final 

action to approve a revision to the South 

Carolina State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) submitted on October 13, 2015, 

through the South Carolina Department 

of Health and Environmental Control 

(SC DHEC). This revision consists of 

transportation conformity criteria and 

procedures related to interagency 

consultation and enforceability of 

certain transportation-related control 

measures and mitigation measures. The 

intended effect of this approval is to 

update the transportation conformity 

criteria and procedures in the South 

Carolina SIP to reorganize previous 

exhibits into a single Memorandum of 

Agreement (MOA) document as well as 

updating signatories to add the newly 

established Lowcountry Area 

Transportation Study (LATS) to the list 

of Metropolitan Planning Organizations 

(MPOs), created to represent a new 

urbanized area designated as a result of 

the 2010 Census. EPA has determined 

that this revision is consistent with the 

Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). 

DATES: This direct final rule is effective 

June 6, 2016 without further notice, 

unless EPA receives adverse comment 

by May 5, 2016. If EPA receives such 

comments, it will publish a timely 

withdrawal of the direct final rule in the 

Federal Register and inform the public 

that the rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2015–0696 at http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from Regulations.gov. 

EPA may publish any comment received 

to its public docket. Do not submit 

electronically any information you 

consider to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Multimedia submissions (audio, video, 

etc.) must be accompanied by a written 

comment. The written comment is 

considered the official comment and 

should include discussion of all points 

you wish to make. EPA will generally 


Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
19496 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

1Although South Carolina currently has only one 

nonattainment area (i.e., a portion of York County) 

for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, its MOA covers 

all of the MPOs in the State should any new areas 

become subject to conformity requirements for a 

transportation-related pollutant in the future. 

not consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, the full 

EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kelly Sheckler, Air Regulatory 

Management Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. 

Sheckler’s telephone number is 404– 

562–9992. She can also be reached via 

electronic mail at Sheckler.Kelly@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Transportation Conformity 

Transportation conformity (hereafter 

referred to as ‘‘conformity’’) is required 

under section 176(c) of the CAA to 

ensure that federally supported highway 

and transit activities are consistent with 

(‘‘conform to’’) the purpose of the SIP. 

Conformity currently applies to areas 

that are designated nonattainment, and 

to areas that have been redesignated to 

attainment after 1990 (i.e., maintenance 

areas) with plans developed under 

section 175A of the Act, for the 

following transportation related criteria 

pollutants: Ozone, particulate matter 

(e.g., PM2.5 and PM10), carbon 

monoxide, and nitrogen dioxide. 

Conformity to the purpose of the SIP 

means that transportation activities will 

not cause or contribute to new air 

quality violations, worsen existing 

violations, or delay timely attainment of 

the national ambient air quality 

standards (NAAQS) for the relevant 

criteria pollutants. The conformity 

regulation is found in 40 CFR part 93 

and provisions related to conformity 

SIPs are found in 40 CFR 51.390. 

II. Background for This Action 

A. Federal Requirements 

EPA promulgated the Federal 

transportation conformity criteria and 

procedures (‘‘Conformity Rule’’) on 

November 24, 1993. 58 FR 62188. 

Among other things, the rule required 

states to address all provisions of the 

conformity rule in their SIPs, frequently 

referred to as ‘‘conformity SIPs.’’ Under 

40 CFR 51.390, most sections of the 

Conformity Rule were required to be 

copied verbatim into the SIP. States 

were also required to tailor all or 

portions of the following three sections 

of the Conformity Rule to the state’s 

individual circumstances: 40 CFR 

93.105, which addresses consultation 

procedures; 40 CFR 93.122(a)(4)(ii), 

which addresses written commitments 

to control measures that are not 

included in a MPO’s transportation plan 

and transportation improvement 

program that must be obtained prior to 

a conformity determination, and the 

requirement that such commitments 

must be fulfilled; and 40 CFR 93.125(c), 

which addresses written commitments 

to mitigation measures that must be 

obtained prior to a project-level 

conformity determination, and the 

requirement that project sponsors must 

comply with such commitments. 

On August 10, 2005, the ‘‘Safe, 

Accountable, Flexible, Efficient 

Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for 

Users’’ (SAFETEA–LU) was signed into 

law. SAFETEA–LU revised section 

176(c) of the CAA transportation 

conformity provisions. One of the 

changes streamlined the requirements 

for conformity SIPs. Under SAFETEA– 

LU, states are required to address and 

tailor only three sections of the rule in 

their conformity SIPs: 40 CFR 93.105, 40 

CFR 93.122(a)(4)(ii), and, 40 CFR 

93.125(c), described above. In general, 

states are no longer required to submit 

conformity SIP revisions that address 

the other sections of the Conformity 

Rule. These changes took effect on 

August 10, 2005, when SAFETEA–LU 

was signed into law. 

B. South Carolina Transportation 

Conformity SIP 

The Conformity Rule requires the 

states to develop their own processes 

and procedures for interagency 

consultation among the Federal, state, 

and local agencies and resolution of 

conflicts meeting the criteria in 40 CFR 

93.105. The conformity SIP revision 

must include processes and procedures 

to be followed by the MPO, state DOT, 

and US DOT in consulting with the state 

and local air quality agencies and EPA 

before making conformity 

determinations. The SIP revision must 

also include processes and procedures 

for the state and local air quality 

agencies and EPA to coordinate the 

development of applicable SIPs with 

MPOs, state DOTs, and the US DOT. 

In 2004, EPA approved the State of 

South Carolina’s initial conformity SIP 

revision which incorporated by 

reference 40 CFR part 93, subpart A (67 

FR 50808), and customized 40 CFR 

93.105, 93.122(a)(4)(ii), and 93.125(c) 

for all of the MPOs in the entire state 

and for the South Carolina Department 

of Transportation (SC DOT). 69 FR 4245. 

Specifically, the State of South Carolina 

established a MOA for implementing 

the conformity criteria and consultation 

procedures for all transportation-related 

pollutants. On July 28, 2009, EPA 

approved a revision to the SC MOA to 

address the relevant NAAQS and 

SAFTEA–LU amendments. 74 FR 

37168. 

III. State Submittal and EPA Evaluation 

On October 13, 2015, the State of 

South Carolina, through SC DHEC, 

submitted the Statewide conformity and 

interagency consultation SIP, based on a 

new MOA signed by all of the MPOs in 

the State 1 and SC DOT, to EPA as a 

revision to the SIP. The SIP revision 

establishes procedures for interagency 

consultation and, upon EPA approval, 

supersedes the SIP revision that EPA 

approved on July 28, 2009. See 74 FR 

37168. 

Specifically, the SC DEHC is now 

proposing certain updates, including a 

reorganization that incorporates 

Exhibits 1 and 2 to the previous MOA 

into the new MOA itself, as well as the 

addition of the Lowcountry Area 

Transportation Study (LATS) to the list 

of MPOs which are signatories to the 

MOA. LATS is a newly established 

MPO that represents a new urbanized 

area designated as a result of the 2010 

Census. LATS covers the Town of 

Hilton Head Island, the Town of 

Bluffton, and parts of unincorporated 

Beaufort County. The State also seeks 

approval of the following additional 

changes from the old MOA: Clarification 

of the responsibilities of the MPOs, 

grammar and punctuation changes, 

recodification of sections C, D and E for 

ease of reading, the addition of language 

to specifically address the requirements 

of 40 CFR 93.122(a)(4)(ii) and 93.125(c), 

and the addition of a new ‘‘General 

Provisions’’ section (section F). 

As noted in EPA’s 2009 approval, 74 

FR 37168, the State of South Carolina 

developed its consultation SIP based on 

the elements contained in 40 CFR 

93.105, 93.122(a)(4)(ii), and 93.125(c) 

and included it in the SIP. As a first 

step, the State worked with the existing 

transportation planning organization’s 

interagency committee that included 

representatives from the SC DHEC; SC 

DOT; all of the MPOs in the State; 

Federal Highway Administration— 

South Carolina Division; Federal Transit 

Administration; and the Region 4 office 

of EPA. The interagency committee met 


Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 19497 

regularly and drafted the consultation 

procedures, considering elements in 40 

CFR 93.105, 93.122(a)(4)(ii), and 

93.125(c), and integrated the local 

procedures and processes into the MOA. 

The resulting consultation process 

developed is unique to the State of 

South Carolina. SC DHEC offered the 

opportunity for a public hearing 

regarding the new MOA on January 6, 

2015, but no hearing was requested and 

thus none was held. No comments, 

written or oral, were received from the 

public. The final MOA was issued by 

South Carolina on October 13, 2015, and 

subsequently submitted to EPA as a SIP 

revision. 

EPA has evaluated this SIP revision 

and has determined that the State has 

met the requirements of federal 

transportation conformity rules as 

described in 40 CFR part 51, subpart T 

and 40 CFR part 93, subpart A. SC 

DHEC has satisfied the public 

participation and comprehensive 

interagency consultation requirement 

during development and adoption of the 

MOA at the local level. Therefore, EPA 

is approving the updated MOA as a 

revision to the South Carolina SIP. 

EPA has reviewed the submittal to 

assure consistency with the CAA as 

amended by SAFETEA–LU and EPA 

regulations (40 CFR part 93 and 40 CFR 

51.390) governing state procedures for 

transportation conformity and 

interagency consultation and has 

concluded that the submittal is 

approvable. 

IV. Final Action 

EPA is taking direct final action under 

sections 110 and 176 of the Act to 

approve the rule implementing the 

conformity criteria and consultation 

procedures revision to the South 

Carolina SIP pursuant to the CAA, as a 

revision to the South Carolina SIP. This 

action also establishes consultation 

procedures for all counties in South 

Carolina. As a result of this action, 

South Carolina’s previously SIPapproved conformity procedures at 74 

FR 37168 will be replaced by the 

procedures submitted to EPA on 

October 13, 2015, for approval and 

adopted by State of South Carolina on 

October 23, 2015. 

EPA is publishing this rule without 

prior proposal because the Agency 

views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. However, in the proposed 

rules section of this Federal Register 

publication, EPA is publishing a 

separate document that will serve as the 

proposal to approve the SIP revision 

should adverse comments be filed. This 

rule will be effective June 6, 2016 

without further notice unless the 

Agency receives adverse comments by 

May 5, 2016. 

If EPA receives such comments, then 

EPA will publish a document 

withdrawing the final rule and 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. All public comments 

received will then be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on the 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period. Parties 

interested in commenting should do so 

at this time. If no such comments are 

received, the public is advised that this 

rule will be effective on June 6, 2016 

and no further action will be taken on 

the proposed rule. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

The SIP is not approved to apply on 

any Indian reservation land or in any 

other area where EPA or an Indian tribe 

has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000), nor will it impose substantial 

direct costs on tribal governments or 

preempt tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by June 6, 2016. Filing a petition 

for reconsideration by the Administrator 

of this final rule does not affect the 

finality of this action for the purposes of 

judicial review nor does it extend the 

time within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. Parties with objections to this 

direct final rule are encouraged to file a 

comment in response to the parallel 

notice of proposed rulemaking for this 

action published in the proposed rules 

section of this issue of the Federal 

Register; rather than file an immediate 

petition for judicial review of this direct 

final rule, so that EPA can withdraw 

this direct final rule and address the 

comment in the proposed rulemaking. 

This action may not be challenged later 

in proceedings to enforce its 

requirements. See section 307(b)(2). 


Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
19498 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Intergovernmental relations, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, 

Incorporation by reference Nitrogen 

dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: March 25, 2016. 

Heather McTeer Toney, 

Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart (PP)—South Carolina 

■ 2. Section 52.2120(e) is amended by 

adding an entry at the end of the table 

for ‘‘South Carolina Transportation 

Conformity Air Quality Implementation 

Plan’’ to read as follows: 

§ 52.2120(e) Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA APPROVED SOUTH CAROLINA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS

Provision State effective 

date EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

South Carolina Transportation Conformity Air Quality Implementation Plan.10/23/2015 4/5/2016, [Insert citation of 

publication] 

[FR Doc. 2016–07811 Filed 4–4–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

44 CFR Part 67 

[Docket ID FEMA–2016–0002] 

Final Flood Elevation Determinations 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: Base (1% annual-chance) 

Flood Elevations (BFEs) and modified 

BFEs are made final for the 

communities listed below. The BFEs 

and modified BFEs are the basis for the 

floodplain management measures that 

each community is required either to 

adopt or to show evidence of being 

already in effect in order to qualify or 

remain qualified for participation in the 

National Flood Insurance Program 

(NFIP). 

DATES: The date of issuance of the Flood 

Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) showing 

BFEs and modified BFEs for each 

community. This date may be obtained 

by contacting the office where the maps 

are available for inspection as indicated 

in the table below. 

ADDRESSES: The final BFEs for each 

community are available for inspection 

at the office of the Chief Executive 

Officer of each community. The 

respective addresses are listed in the 

table below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis 

Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering 

Management Branch, Federal Insurance 

and Mitigation Administration, Federal 

Emergency Management Agency, 500 C 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, 

(202) 646–4064, or (email) 

Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Federal Emergency Management Agency 

(FEMA) makes the final determinations 

listed below for the modified BFEs for 

each community listed. These modified 

elevations have been published in 

newspapers of local circulation and 

ninety (90) days have elapsed since that 

publication. The Deputy Associate 

Administrator for Mitigation has 

resolved any appeals resulting from this 

notification. 

This final rule is issued in accordance 

with section 110 of the Flood Disaster 

Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, 

and 44 CFR part 67. FEMA has 

developed criteria for floodplain 

management in floodprone areas in 

accordance with 44 CFR part 60. 

Interested lessees and owners of real 

property are encouraged to review the 

proof Flood Insurance Study and FIRM 

available at the address cited below for 

each community. The BFEs and 

modified BFEs are made final in the 

communities listed below. Elevations at 

selected locations in each community 

are shown. 

National Environmental Policy Act. 

This final rule is categorically excluded 

from the requirements of 44 CFR part 

10, Environmental Consideration. An 

environmental impact assessment has 

not been prepared. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood 

elevation determinations are not within 

the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory 

flexibility analysis is not required. 

Regulatory Classification. This final 

rule is not a significant regulatory action 

under the criteria of section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 

1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, 

58 FR 51735. 

Executive Order 13132, Federalism. 

This final rule involves no policies that 

have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform. This final rule meets the 

applicable standards of Executive Order 

12988. 

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

Dated: March 10, 2016. 

Roy E. Wright, 

Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance 

and Mitigation, Department of Homeland 

Security, Federal Emergency Management 

Agency. 

Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is 

amended as follows: 

PART 67—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 67 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; 

Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR, 

1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 

3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376. 

§ 67.11 [Amended] 

■ 2. The tables published under the 

authority of § 67.11 are amended as 

follows: 


Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES