alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2820 Engrossed in House (EH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2820

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To reauthorize the Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act of 2005, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research 
Reauthorization Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE STEM CELL THERAPEUTIC AND RESEARCH ACT OF 
              2005.

    (a) Cord Blood Inventory.--Section 2 of the Stem Cell Therapeutic 
and Research Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 274k note) is amended in subsection 
(h)--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``$23,000,000 for each of fiscal 
                years 2011 through 2014 and''; and
                    (B) by inserting before the period at the end the 
                following: ``and $23,000,000 for each of fiscal years 
                2016 through 2020''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``2011 through 2015'' and 
        inserting ``2015 through 2020''.
    (b) National Program.--Section 379B of the Public Health Service 
Act (42 U.S.C. 274m) is amended by striking ``2011 through 2014'' and 
inserting ``2016 through 2020''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2820

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To reauthorize the Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act of 2005, and 
                          for other purposes.
```
# C_2022168EN.01000101.xml

| 22.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/1

---

Application date of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/467providing for exceptional adjustment aid to producers in the agricultural sectors

(2022/C 168/01)

Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2022/467 (1) provides that the Regulation shall apply from the day of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of a communication of the Commission stating that the transfer from the crisis reserve to the budget line financing the exceptional measure was made in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 (2).

The transfer took place on 20 April 2022 and therefore Regulation (EU) 2022/467 is applicable as of the day of publication of this notice.

---

(1)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/467 of 23 March 2022 providing for exceptional adjustment aid to producers in the agricultural sectors (OJ L 96, 24.3.2022, p. 4).

(2)  Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 1).

---
EXHIBIT
3.1
 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
ENDOLOGIX, INC.,
a Delaware corporation
 Corporation
   ARTICLE IV
 Classes of Stock




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



/s/ John McDermottJohn McDermott,President and Chief Executive Officer 3




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
ENDOLOGIX, INC.,
A DELAWARE CORPORATION
    ARTICLE IV
  4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



/s/ Paul McCormickPaul McCormick,President and Chief Executive Officer 6




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
ENDOLOGIX, INC.,
A DELAWARE CORPORATION
    ARTICLE IV
  7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



/s/ David M. RichardsDavid M. Richards,Chief Financial   Officer 9




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF THE
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
RADIANCE MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.,
A DELAWARE CORPORATION
    ARTICLE I
    10




---



##### 



/s/ David M. RichardsDavid M. Richards,Chief Financial   Officer 11




---



##### 



RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
RADIANCE MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
 (PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 242 AND 245 OF THE
GENERAL CORPORATION LAW OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE)
      ARTICLE I
  ARTICLE II
  ARTICLE III
  ARTICLE IV
  12




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
  13




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
  ARTICLE VII
  ARTICLE VIII
  ARTICLE IX
  ARTICLE X
  14




---



##### 



/s/ Stephen R. KrollStephen R. KrollVice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary 15
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

MAXINE ROSENKEIMER AS EXECUTRIX

OF THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR W.

ROSENKEIMER, III,

Petitioner

v.

A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, ET. AL.,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 123 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of August, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00136

- CR

Joe Torres v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 12

- CR

- 4051

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

a ppeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal
DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 27, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2638 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2638

To require the Secretary of State to seek to negotiate the elimination 
  of all foreign subsidies for international postal shipments to the 
                 United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 10, 2018

  Mr. Cassidy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of State to seek to negotiate the elimination 
  of all foreign subsidies for international postal shipments to the 
                 United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ending Needless Delivery Subsidies 
Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE UNIVERSAL POSTAL UNION.

    (a) Elimination of All Foreign Subsidies for International Postal 
Shipments.--Not later than January 1, 2021, the Secretary of State 
shall seek to negotiate before the Universal Postal Union (in this 
section referred to as the ``UPU'') the elimination of all foreign 
subsidies for international postal shipments to the United States.
    (b) Future Agreements.--The Secretary may not conclude any 
international agreement relating to postal shipments after the date of 
the enactment of this Act unless the postal rates granted to United 
States exporters under the agreement are similar to the postal rates 
granted to exporters in other countries that are parties to the 
agreement.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION*
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Dated: March 28, 2011
    
    By:
    
    /s/ James A. McGradyJames A. McGrady, Chief Executive Officer,President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financialand Accounting Officer)
 *
    
    This Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall
not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of
1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1890

BRIAN BACCHUS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOUTHEASTERN MECHANICAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:10-

cv-01684-RWT)

Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: November 17, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian Bacchus, Appellant Pro Se. David W. Long-Daniels, Natasha 

L. Wilson, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; John 

Francis Scalia, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Brian Bacchus appeals the district court’s order 

granting appellee’s summary judgment motion. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny 

Bacchus’ motion for a subpoena and affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Bacchus v. Southeastern Mech. Servs., 

Inc., No. 8:10-cv-01684-RWT (D. Md. July 21, 2011). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### SHIPP v. METZGER et al.

No. 9876.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

June 24, 1936.

E. P. Lipscomb, of .San Antonio, for plaintiff in error.

Saunders, Saunders & Whipple, of San Antonio, for defendants in error.

SMITH, Chief Justice.

In this case plaintiff in error sought to appeal, by writ of error, from an interlocutory order sustaining defendants in error’s plea of privilege to be sued in Dallas county. Upon motion of defendants in error this court-dismissed the writ of error, upon the ground that that method of appeal does not lie in such cases.

Subsequently plaintiff in error applied for and received from the clerk of this court a certificate showing the date of the filing of the record in this court, and that “motion by Defendants in Error to dismiss for want of jurisdiction was filed'on April 27, 1936, and said motion granted by this Court on May 13, 1936, and the cause dismissed.”

Defendants in error have now filed a motion in this court to recall said certificate, upon the ground that the clerk was without authority to issue same until the costs of appeal had been paid. This contention is based upon the provision of article 1865, R.S.1925, as follows: “On the rendition of a final judgment or decree in the Court of Civil Appeals, the clerk of said court shall not issue and deliver the mandate of the court, nor certify the proceedings to the lower court, until all costs accruing in the case in such appellate court have been paid, subject, however, to the provisions of the succeeding article.”

The certificate complained of by defendants in error is not a certification of “the proceedings to the lower court” within the contemplation of the statute cited. It does not authorize the court below to take any further action in the case, nor can any further proceedings be had therein except upon timely issuance of mandate. Nor may mandate issue until the costs of appeal have been paid, plaintiff in error having given writ of error bond.

Any litigant, or other interested party, may apply for and receive from the clerk of this court, or any other court of record, a simple certificate, such as that complained of here, of the orders and decrees of the court, and other facts of rec*316ord therein. But such certificate can never he used, directly or indirectly, to serve the purpose of a mandate or certificate of proceedings such as is provided for in article 1865. It is appropriate to add that the certificate of the clerk here in question is inaccurate in so far as it recites that the “cause was dismissed,” since in fact only the attempted writ of error was dismissed.

Defendants in error’s motion is overruled, at the cost of defendants in error.
Dismiss; Opinion Filed January 24, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-01142-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.L.K. AND L.M.K., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-04986

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Schenck, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Myers

The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By postcard 

dated September 18, 2019, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed 

appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do 

so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated September 18, 2019, we 

informed appellant the docketing statement in this case was due. We cautioned appellant that 

failure to file the docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal 

without further notice. By letter dated January 6, 2020, we informed appellant the clerk’s record 

had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to 

provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or to provide written 

documentation appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs within ten 

days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal 
–2–

without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, provided the required 

documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

191142F.P05

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF A.L.K. AND 

L.M.K., CHILDREN

No. 05-19-01142-CV 

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-04986.

Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. 

Justices Schenck and Carlyle participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 24th day of January, 2020.
ACCEPTED 03-15-00378-CV 7070244 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/23/2015 7:30:40 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK 

### NO. 03-15-00378-CV IN THE TIDRD COURT OF APPEALS
JAMES HANSEN



## v.
LONNIE ROACH and BEMIS, ROACH 

## & REED
APPEAL FROM THE 98TH 

### JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY APPELLANT'S AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF

Comes now Appellant James Hansen and files this motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. Appellant's briefis due to be filed in this court on October 5, 2015. Due to the press ofother deadlines and family medical issues, additional time is needed for the preparation ofappellant's brief. John Shepperd, opposing counsel, has been consulted concerning this motion and has agreed to the granting of the additional time requested. Appellant requests thatthe court extend the appellant's briefing schedule until on orbefore October 19, 2015. Wherefore, Appellant prays that the court grant this motion and extend the timeto file appellant's briefuntil on orbefore October 19,2015.

1KIDD LAW FIRM 819 West 11th Street Austin, TX 78701 512-330-1709 (fax) Is/Scott R. Kidd Scott R. Kidd StateBar No. 11385500 512-330-1713 scott@kiddlawaustin.com ScottV. Kidd State BarNo. 24065556 512-542-9895 svk@kiddlawaustin.com ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT Certificate ofConference Appellee's attorney, John Shepperd, was consulted concerning this motion and has agreedtothe granting ofthe motion. Is/Scott R. Kidd Certificate ofService Acopy ofthis motion has been served on John Shepperd by fax this 23rd day ofSeptember, 2015. 

### Is/Scott R. Kidd

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,084
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,392
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,855
<PP&E>                                         197,487
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,821
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 216,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,156
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           256
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   216,359
<SALES>                                         15,597
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,691
<CGS>                                            9,642
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,285)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,573)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,712)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,712)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022197EN.01000101.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10343 – DISCOVERY / WARNER MEDIA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 197/01)

On 22 December 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10343. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10343. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
"iMfMENTOF 

SERVED JANUARY 3, 2011 '' ITORTATiON 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MESA AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP05SW0018 

(Civil Penalty Case) 

DMS FAA-2005-22891 

.::. ;• OPERMiONS 

AN -M A ^: 3 1 

ORDER ON STATUS OF CASE 

In prior pleadings the Agency notified the undersigned that the matter is pending 

settlement subject to the approval of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. 

WHEREFORE, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 

1. The parties are hereby directed to notify the Judge, in writing, by February 1, 2011, 

the status of this case and status of settlement. 

^ < 

teodwrn 

.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment(s) - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP05SW0018 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Att: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2014' 

ONE COPY 

Christopher Pappaioanou 

Director, Legal Affairs 

Mesa Air Group 

410 North 44* Street, Suite 700 

Phoenix, AZ 85008 

TEL: (602)685-4000 

FAX: (602) 685-4350 

Annjenet Chennault, Attorney 

Safety Enforcement Branch 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E4, AC 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Fort Worth, TX 76193-0007 

TEL: (817)222-5071 

FAX: (817)222-5092/5946 

t^' 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. «'^ 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 | 

TEL: (202) 366-2139 Attorney-Advisor ^^^ 

(202) 366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: (202)366-7536 

^ Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administraion, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building - Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Att: Hearing Docket Cleik, AGC-430. 

a 

i
##### 



th
 /s/ Kevin G. MougKevin G. Moug In Presence of:/s/ Gary Spies/s/ John MacFarlane




---



##### 



th
 /s/  John MacFarlaneJohn MacFarlane In Presence of:/s/ Gary Spies/s/ Kevin Moug




---



##### 



th
 /s/ Karen BohnKaren Bohn In Presence of:/s/ Joyce Nelson Schuette/s/ John MacFarlane




---



##### 



th
 /s/ Dennis EmmenDennis Emmen In Presence of:/s/ Edward J. McIntyre/s/ Kenneth L. Nelson




---



##### 



th
 /s/ Arvid LiebeArvid Liebe In Presence of:/s/ Gary Spies/s/ Kevin Moug




---



##### 



th
 /s/ Edward J. McIntyreEdward J. McIntyre In Presence of:/s/ Dennis Emmen/s/ Kenneth Nelson




---



##### 



th
 /s/ Joyce Nelson SchuetteJoyce Nelson Schuette In Presence of:/s/ Nathan Partain/s/ Karen Bohn




---



##### 



th
 /s/ Kenneth NelsonKenneth Nelson In Presence of:/s/ John MacFarlane/s/ Lori Talafous




---



##### 



th
 /s/ Nathan PartainNathan Partain In Presence of:/s/ Chuck MacFarlane/s/ Charles R. Hoge




---



##### 



th
 /s/ Gary SpiesGary Spies In Presence of:/s/ Kevin Moug/s/ John MacFarlane