alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31(a)****RULE 13a — 14(a)/15d — 14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Sherrill Stone, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Peerless Mfg. Co., certifythat:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Peerless Mfg. Co.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under oursupervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating tothe registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during theperiod in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of thedisclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’sinternal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the designor operation of internal controlover financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves managementor other employees who have asignificant role in theregistrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.         /s/ Sherrill Stone  Sherrill Stone   Chairman of the Board and
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Nolberto Ortega, Jr. a/k/a Albert * From the 266th District Court

Ortega, Jr. a/k/a Nolbert Ortega, Jr., of Erath County,

 Trial Court No. CR14715.

Vs. No. 11-17-00036-CR * January 31, 2019

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, S.C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

 sitting by assignment) 

 (Willson, J., not participating)

 

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
# C_2022379EN.01001401.xml

| 3.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/14

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10712 – APOLLO MANAGEMENT / TENNECO)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 379/08)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Apollo Management, L.P. (‘Apollo’, USA), |
| --- | --- |

—

Apollo Management, L.P. (‘Apollo’, USA),

| — | Tenneco Inc. (‘Tenneco’, USA). |
| --- | --- |

—

Tenneco Inc. (‘Tenneco’, USA).

Apollo will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Tenneco.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Apollo is active in the global asset management and portfolio investments. Apollo has recently acquired sole control over MAFTEC Co. Ltd. (‘MAFTEC’). MAFTEC is active in the production and supply of polycrystalline alumina fiber wool (‘PCW’) blankets and mats. PCW blankets are used for various high-temperature fireproof applications. PCW blankets can be further processed to produce PCW mats, which are used as a substrate support in automobile’s catalytic converters. |
| --- | --- |

—

Apollo is active in the global asset management and portfolio investments. Apollo has recently acquired sole control over MAFTEC Co. Ltd. (‘MAFTEC’). MAFTEC is active in the production and supply of polycrystalline alumina fiber wool (‘PCW’) blankets and mats. PCW blankets are used for various high-temperature fireproof applications. PCW blankets can be further processed to produce PCW mats, which are used as a substrate support in automobile’s catalytic converters.

| — | Tenneco is a global supplier of components for motor vehicles. Tenneco uses PCW mats as an input for the manufacture of catalytic converters and aftertreatment systems. |
| --- | --- |

—

Tenneco is a global supplier of components for motor vehicles. Tenneco uses PCW mats as an input for the manufacture of catalytic converters and aftertreatment systems.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10712 – APOLLO MANAGEMENT / TENNECO

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
NO. 04-15-00685-CV 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 

FLAGSHIP HOMES, LTD. D/B/A PRESTIGE HOMES 

VS. 

JULIAN CALDERAS, JR. AND ERIKA CALDERAS 

 

ADVISORY TO THE COURT AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 

 Flagship Homes, Ltd. d/b/a Prestige Homes, Appellant, respectfully notifies the Court 

that all matters in controversy in this appeal have been settled and compromised, and that 

Appellant no longer desires to prosecute this Appeal. 

 WHEREFORE, Appellant prays that this Appeal be dismissed as being moot, and for 

general relief. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 Bayne, Snell & Krause 

 1250 N.E. Loop 410, Suite 725 

 San Antonio, Texas 78209 

 Telephone: (210) 824-3278 

 Telecopier: (210) 824-3937 

 By: /s/ Barry Snell 

Barry Snell 

 State Bar No. 18789000 

 bsnell@bsklaw.com 

 Attorneys for Appellant 

ACCEPTED

04-15-00685-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

11/6/2015 3:11:19 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 11/6/2015 3:11:19 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
APPROVED AND AGREED: 

KUSTOFF & PHIPPS, L.L.P. 

4103 Parkdale Street 

San Antonio, Texas 78229 

Telephone: (210) 614-9444 

Telecopier: (210) 614-9464 

By:/s/ DANIEL O. KUSTOFF

 DANIEL O. KUSTOFF 

State Bar No. 11770515 

MELANIE HESSLER SANDERS 

 State Bar No. 24032416 

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES
[LETTERHEAD OF FAHN, KANNE & CO.]

                   Auditors' Report to the Shareholders of
                I.C.P. - ISRAEL CABLE PROGRAMMING COMPANY LTD.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of I.C.P. - ISRAEL CABLE
PROGRAMMING COMPANY LTD. (hereinafter: "the Company") as of December 31, 1998
and 1997, and the related statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the board of
directors and management of the Company. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, including those prescribed by the Israeli Auditors' Regulations (Mode
of Performance), 1973. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free of
material misstatement, whether accidental or intentional. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by the board of directors and by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

The abovementioned financial statements were prepared on the basis of historical
cost, adjusted to reflect changes in the purchasing power of the Israeli
currency, in accordance with Opinions of the Institute of Certified Public
Accountants in Israel. Condensed financial statements in nominal shekels, which
served as the basis for the adjusted statements, are presented in Note 24.

In our opinion, the aforementioned financial statements present fairly, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 1998 and
1997, and the results of operations, changes in shareholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998. In
addition, in our opinion, the abovementioned financial statements were prepared
in accordance with the Securities Regulations (Preparation of Annual Financial
Statements) - 1993.

Without qualifying our opinion, we call attention to Note 1(A)(3), regarding the
negotiations between the cable television companies and the Supervisor of
Restrictive Trade Practices which include, inter alia, the continued operation
of the Company. The financial statements do not contain any adjustments to the
value or classification of any assets or liabilities that might have to be made
in the event that the Company can no longer function as a "Going Concern".


                                            /s/ Fahn, Kanne & Co.

                                            Fahn, Kanne & Co.
                                            Certified Public Accountants
Tel-Aviv, February 25, 1999
##### 



EXHIBIT 21
 SPARTECH CORPORATIONSUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
 Incorporation orLegal Entity
    
    DBA
    
    OrganizationAtlas Alchem Plastics, Inc.
    
    Spartech Plastics
    
    DelawareTKM Plastics, L.P.
    
    Spartech Plastics
    
    MissouriSpartech Plastics, LLC
    
    Spartech Plastics
    
    DelawareAlchem Plastics, Inc.
    
    Spartech Plastics
    
    DelawareAlchem Plastics Corporation
    
    Spartech Plastics
    
    GeorgiaSpartech SPD, LLC
    
    Spartech Plastics
    
    DelawareSpartech Polycast, Inc.
    
    Spartech Polycast
    
    DelawareSpartech Polycom, Inc.
    
    Spartech Polycom
    
    PennsylvaniaSpartech Polycom, S.A.S.
    
    Spartech Polycom
    
    FranceUVTEC, L.P.
    
    Spartech Polycom
    
    TexasFranklin-Burlington Plastics, Inc.
    
    Spartech Polycom
    
    DelawareSpartech FCD, LLC
    
    Spartech Calendered
and Converted 
Products Division
    
    DelawareSpartech CMD, LLC
    
    Spartech CMD
    
    DelawarePolymer Extruded Products, Inc.
    
    Spartech PEP
    
    New JerseySpartech Townsend, Inc.
    
    Spartech Townsend
    
    DelawareSpartech Industries Florida, Inc.
    
    Spartech Marine
    
    DelawareSpartech Industries, Inc.
    
    Spartech Industries
    
    DelawareAlshin Tire Corporation
    
    Spartech Industries
    
    CaliforniaSpartech Canada, Inc.
    
    Spartech Color
    
    New BrunswickSpartech PlasticsSpartech ProfilesSpartech de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Spartech Plastics
    
    MexicoSpartech PolycomIndustrias Spartech de Mexico,

S.R.L. de C.V.
    
    Spartech Industries
    
    Mexico
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CAFETERIA OPERATORS, L.P. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED JUNE 29, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1999
<CASH>                                           9,403
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,016
<ALLOWANCES>                                        17
<INVENTORY>                                      6,680
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,196
<PP&E>                                         106,021
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,187
<BONDS>                                         57,966
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (25,725)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,456
<SALES>                                         93,199
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,199
<CGS>                                           27,612
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                62,630
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 147
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,810
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,810
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,810
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

LUGUS IP LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

VOLVO CAR CORPORATION, VOLVO CARS OF 

NORTH AMERICA LLC,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________ 

2014-1743

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of New Jersey in No. 1:12-cv-02906-JEI-JS, Judge 

Joseph E. Irenas.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JOHN ROBERT FUISZ, The Fuisz-Kundu Group LLP, 

Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also 

represented by SUDIP KUMAR KUNDU. 

MATTHEW J. MOORE, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by GABRIEL BELL, JONATHAN D. LINK, ROBERT J.

GAJARSA; ARNOLD B. CALMANN, Saiber LLC, Newark, NJ.

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (REYNA, SCHALL, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          18,594
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  252,356
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,074
<INVENTORY>                                    204,910
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               594,714
<PP&E>                                       6,119,706
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,621,109
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,405,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          485,995
<BONDS>                                      2,264,685
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,507
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,095,032
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,405,887
<SALES>                                      2,511,247
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,654,304
<CGS>                                        1,391,772
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,459,436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               338,703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             163,806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                304,395
<INCOME-TAX>                                   124,140
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            180,255
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,188)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   175,067
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.72<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.65
        
<FN>
<F1> Reflects basic earnings per share.
</FN>

</TABLE>
# C_2023202EN.01008401.xml

| 9.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/84 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/84

---

Corrigendum to Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector, as referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 104 of 4 March 2022
  )

(2023/C 202/15)

On page 39, in the third paragraph:

for:

‘Languedoc / Coteaux du Languedoc’,

read:

‘Languedoc’.

On page 40, under point 1, ‘Name(s)’:

for:

‘Languedoc

Coteaux du Languedoc’,

read:

‘Languedoc’.

---
#### ROCKETT v. STATE.

No. 18369.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 20, 1936.

Rehearing Denied June 17, 1936.

Frank Judkins, of Eastland, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty.,. of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is rape; penalty assessed at' confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The indictment contains three counts. The first count, charging rape by force, was submitted to the jury.

That the appellant had sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix is well settled by the evidence. The only controverted question was whether the act was committed by force or with the consent of the prosecu-trix. That issue was submitted to the jury in an appropriate charge against which no objections were addressed.

The record is before this court without bills of exception.

The sufficiency of the evidence, while somewhat conflicting, is not deemed open to debate.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

ICRUEGER, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant renews his contention that the evidence is insufficient to justify his conviction. A careful review of the statement of facts has failed to convince us that we were in error in our original opinion in holding the evidence sufficient. Hence the motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM,

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
[LETTERHEAD OF KPMG]

                      AUDITORS' REPORT TO THE SHAREHOLDERS
                                       OF
                            GENERAL ENGINEERS LIMITED

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of General Engineers Limited
("the Company") as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the statements of income,
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1997, expressed in New Israel Shekels. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the board of directors and management of
the Company. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, including standards prescribed by the Auditors' Regulations
(Auditor's Mode of Performance), 1973, and accordingly we have performed such
auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. For
purposes of these financial statements there is no material differences between
generally accepted Israeli auditing standards and auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement, whether due to an error in the financial
statements or to anything misleading therein. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by the board of directors and management of the
Company, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a fair basis for our opinion.

The above financial statements were prepared on the historical cost basis
adjusted for changes in the general purchasing power of the Israeli currency
according to Opinions of the Institute of Certified Public Accountants in
Israel. Condensed financial statements in nominal values, on the basis of which
the adjusted financial statements were prepared, are presented in Note 14 to the
financial statements.

In our opinion, based on our audits, the abovementioned financial statement
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company
as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, the results of its operations, the changes in
its shareholders' equity and the cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1997, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in Israel, consistently applied.

Accounting principles generally accepted in Israel differ in certain respects
from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The
application of the latter would have affected the determination of historical
net income and shareholders' equity to the extent summarized in Note 15 to the
financial statements.

Braude Bavly

/s/ Braude Bavly

Tel Aviv. February 12, 1998