Febmary 25,2009 

David P. Stoklosa 

Eastman Kodak Company - Eastman Business Park 

1669 Lake Avenue, Building 56, Floor 5 

Rochester, NY 14652-4543 

Dear Permittee: 

Re: Facility: Eastman Kodak Company 

DEC No.: 8-2614-00205/00137 

SPDES No.: NY 000 1643 

On February 24, 2009, the department received your application to renew the referenced 

State Pollution Discharge Environmental System (SPDES) pem1it. Prior to moving forward with 

the administrative procedures required for permit renewal, the department will be undertaking a 

full technical review of the SPDES discharge to determine the need to incorporate new pcnnit 

requirements under the Federal Clean Water Act 

Based on your timely and sufficient renewal application submission, your current pennit 

will remain in effect after the expiration date under the provisions orthe State Administrative 

Procedure Act (SAPA), should the department's technical review and the subsequent permit 

modification not be completed prior to the expiration datc orthe current pemlit. 

The timing of the department's full technical review will be detennined by the ranking 

of the discharge under the department's Environmental Benefit Permit Strategy (EBPS). The 

EBPS uti lizes a number of criteria to score and rank a wastewater discharge, giving priority for 

technica l review to those discharges with the greatest potential to cause environmental harm. 

If not already provided prior to the submission orthe renewal applIcation, you will receive a 

"Request for Information" from the department seeking data to be llsed In the evaluation of the 

discharge and in the establislmlent of new provisions proposed for inclusion in the pennit. 

Renewal application procedures, including public notice, will be commenced concurrently with 

proposed pennit modifications. A decision on pennit renewal and modification will be made 

following a consideration of comments from you and the public or after a public hearing, if a 

hearing is held. 
cc: B. Baker 

C. Webber 

M . Wilson 

P. Lent - Region 8 

D. Rollins - Region 8 

J:~1u-~ 

Lindy Sue Czubemat 

Agency Program Aide 
Permittee Contact Name, Title, Address Facility and epe es Permit Information 

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY - Eastman Business Park 

DAVID P STOKLOSA 

t 669 LAKE AVE, BULDG. 56, FL 5 

ROCHESTER NY 14652-4543 

Name: EASTMAN KODAK CO 

tnd. Code: 3861 County: MONROE 

DEC No .. 8-2614-00205/00137 

SPOES No.: NY 000 1643 

Expiration Dale: 09/01/2009 

Application Due By: 03/0512009 

Are these name(s) & addressees) correct? if nol, please write corrections above 

The Slate Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit for the facility referenced above expires on the date indicated. You are 

required by law to file a complete renewal application at least 180 days prior to expiration of your current permit. 

Note the "Application Due By" date above. 

CAUTION: This short application form and attached questionnaire are the only forms acceptable for permit renewal. Sign Part 2 

below and mail only this form and Ihe completed questionnaire I:lsing the enclesed envelope. Effective April " 1994 the 

Department no longer assesses SPDES application fees. to the address below 

If there are changes to your di scharge, or to operations affecting the discharge, then in ac application, you must also 

submit a separate permit 'modilicalion application to the Regional Permit Administrator region in which Ihe facility is located, as 

required by' your current permit. See the reverse side of this page for instruclions on filing a modification request. 

PART 2 RENEWAL APPLICATION 

CERTIFICATION: I hereby a!1irm that under penatty 01 that the information provided on thiS form and all al1achments 51. the best of my knowledge 

and belief. Fatse statements made herein are punishable as a Ctass A misdemeanor pursuant to section 

Name of person signin9J!.ppfication (see instructions on ba ck) 

David P. Stoklosa 

Title 

Director, Kodak Rochester Facilities, 

Eastman Kodak Company 

a. 

PART 3 - PERMIT (Below this line - Official Use Only) 

Effective 0<11&:_-,--" __ Expiration Oale:_-,--" __ 

Permit Administrator 

Signature Date 

NYS DEC - Division 01 Environmental Permits 

Address: Bureau 01 Environmental Analysis 

625 Broadway, Albany, NY t 2233·t 750 

'fhis permit together with the previous valid permit for this facility issued I 1 and subsequent modIfications constitute 

authorization 10 discharge wastewater in accordance with all terms, conditions and limitations previously issued valid permit, 

modifications thereof or issued as part of this permit, including any special or generaf conditions attached hereto. Nothing in this 

permit shat! be deemed to waive Ihe, Department's authority to initiale a modification of this permit on the grounds specified in 

6NVCRA §621.1,4, 6NYCRR §754.4 or 6NYCRR §757.1 existing at tha lime this permit is issued or which arise thereafter. 

Attachments: General Conditions daled _ _ , _ 
David P. Stoklosa, Director 

FPEG - Kodak Rochester Business Development & Facilities 

pi Floor Building 26 Kodak Park 

1669 Lake Avenue 

Rochester NY. )4652-4770 t.tAR I C)8 Re: SPDES Pennit Modification 

Two Year Extension of Dioxin Pollutant Minimization Program (Dioxin PMP) 

DEC Pennit No. : 8-2614-00205/00137 

SPDES No. : NYOOO 1643 

Eastman Kodak Company - Kodak Park Facility It 

(C) Rochester & (T) Greece, Monroe Co. b.:J 

Dear Me Stoklosa: 

Enclosed 

This letter is being sent to transmit the modified permit which includes changes approved by the NYS 

Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) for the above-referenced pennit modification of the 

SPDES Permit for the Kodak Park Facility. 

Two permit pages, Page 1 and Page 13A contain changes. Page I of the permit has been modified to 

include the date this modification is effective, which is March 1,2008, and to update the Perminee 

Contact name to David P. Stoklosa from the previous contact Elizabeth B. Hearne. 

Page 13A has been changed to indicate that the Dioxin PMP has been extended for an additional 2-year 

period, until March 1, 2010, in order for Kodak to meet the calculated \vater quality based effluent 

limit. In addition, previous item 4.d . . is now indicated as 4.1. Also in item. 6 , the term "(monthly)" has 

... ,..1..: ........... .. ... ,. •• J.. ... .... ... - •• .... . .... .... . . .. . .. . .... - ' .:., .... 

'h- ," " , ,. . ., . 

. _ _ .. __ _ _ " .... ....... .. ......... '-'J .Ii ...... .......... , Lulu ............ " , Hvll., ... {\.1I1/:>..> ..... II Yo III Oc: 

sampled. Also. a sentence has been added to indicate that the sample type will be a 24 hr. composite for 

both influent and effluent. 

As a reminder, DEC is expecting to receive the annual status report, which is referred to in Item 4.1 on 

Page J 3A. The annual status report is to be submitted by March 1 each year to the Regional Water 

Engineer. 

If there are any questions regarding the moditication or the SPDES pennit. please contact Mr. Pradeep 

Jangbari, 585-226-532l , in the Division of Water office of DEC Region 8 Headquarters. Mr. Jangbari 

Received NYSD: r MAR 20 IOOB 
Any applications for future modifications for this permit must be submitted to the Regional Permit 

Administrator at this office. 

If you have any questions, please contact me at this office (585) 226·5390. 

Sincerely, 

I 0.- . J ./ f-> 

1.1 L{ .,,<.')<,.-

Peter A. Lent 

Regional Permit Administrator 

Enclosure: Modified SPDES Permit 

cc: Mr. Thomas Marrion, Kodak Projects· Avon, w/enel. 

USEPA, Region II, Chief. Water Permits Branch, w.lencl 

Mr. Pradeep Jangbari, NYSDEC·Avon. Division of Water. w/eneL Mr. John Weidman. NYSDEC·Albany. Division of Water, w/enel. 

Monroe County Health Department, w/enel. 

Mr. David Rice, Eastman Kodak Company. wleDcl. 
711/04. 10/1/04,3/1/05,311 /08 

Water Index Number: ONT-117 

Compact Area: IJC 

This SPDES pennit is issued in compliance with Tille 8 of Article 17 of the Environmental Conservation Law of 

New York Stale and in compliance with the Clean Water Act, as amended. (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et.seq.)(hereinafter referred 10 

as "the Act"). 

PERMITTEE NAME AND ADDRESS 

Name: Eastman Koda\.: Company - Kodak Park Division Attention: David P. Stoklosa; Director, Kodak Rochester 

Facilities 

Street: 1669 lake Ave. 

City: Rochester 

is authorized to discharge from the facility described below: 

FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS 

Name : Eastman Kodak Co. 

Location (C,T, V): Rochester (C) 

Facility Address: 

City: 

NYTM -E: 

From Outfall No.: 

Kodak Park Division, 1669 Lake Avenue Rochester 

283. 

001 at Latitude: .. 13 0 

into receiving waters known as: Genesee River 

and (list other OUlfalls, Receiving Waters & Water Classifications) 

See Outfall listing on pages 3 & 4 of this permit. 

Slate: NY Zip Code: 14652-3615 

County: Monroe 

State: NY 

NYTM - N: 4 786 .. 

Zip Code: 14652 

12 ' 0 " & Longitude: 77 0 37 

Class: B 

20 " 

in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth in this pennit and 

6 NYCRR Part 750-I.2(a) and 750-2. 

DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (DMR) MAILING ADDRESS 

.\1:.1ilin::: Nn.:T1c: Street: 

Ciry: 

En.;tr,)nr, Kn.1"k rompan:- (Atm: 

1669 Lake Avenue (Building 95) 

Rochester State: NY Zip Code: 14652-4002 

Responsible Official or Agent: David P. Stoklosa; Director, Kodak Rochester Phone: (5 85) 477-84Q5 

Facilities 

This pennit and the authorization to discharge shall expire on midnight of the expiration date shown above and the 

permil1ee shall not discharge after the exp iration date unless this pennit has been renewed, or extended pursuant to law. To 

be authorized to discharge beyond the expiration date, the permittee shall apply for pennit renewal not less than 180 days 

prior to the expiration date shown above. 

DISTRIBUTION' hmm Admm,>Ualor Peter A. Lent 

Addrm. NYSDEC· Region 8 

6274 East Avon-Lima Road, Avon, NY 14414 

/ ) /" , . ' I- I);(>r ...... ( I." , ·f 
S

G O

OC

SS OU

S 

LISTING OF STORM WATER OUTFALLS 

OUTFALL 001 REQUIREMENTS 

LIMITS FOR CONVENTIONALS AND NON-CONVENTIONALS 

LIMITS FOR INORGANICS LIMITS FOR ORGANICS 

FOOTNOTES 

ACTION LEVELS 

TOXICI1Y TESTING AND CONTROL 

MISCELLANEOUS CONDITIONS 

POLLUTANT MINIMIZATION PROGRAM, DIOXIN 

OUTFALL 003, 004,006,025,035 and 109 REQUIREMENTS 

LIMITS 

ACTION LEVELS 

FOOTNOTES 

TOXICI1Y TESTING AND CONTROL 

STORM WATER MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 

LIMITS 

ACTION LEVELS 

FOOTNOTES 

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS GENERAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PLAN 

SITE SPECIFIC BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR SEWERS 

PERMIT DETAIL DEFINITIONS 

DEFINITIONS AND MONITORING LOCATIONS 

MONITORING, RECORDING AND REPORTING 

RADIATION CONTROL PERMIT 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

10 

11 

13 

13A 

14 

16 

17 18 

21 

23 

24 

25 26 

27 

29 

33 
CLASS 

00 1 King ' s Landi ng Effl uent, Pr ocess Genesee River 43"'12 ' 0" 

Wa stewater (and wa ter fr om Class B 77"37 ' 20 " 

associated activities) and storm 

wat.er 

003 Sto rm wa t er and Non - Contact Paddy Hill 43°12 ' 00 " 

Cooling ItJa t e r vi a highway Creek 7/,°40 ' 37" 

drainage ditch Class C 

004 Non-Contact Cooling Wa ter and Genesee River 43'11 ' 59 " 

Storm water via city storm sewer Class B 77"39 ' 37 " 

006 Storm water and No n-contact Paddy Hill 43°12' 08 " 

Cooling Water Pump Station Creek 77 J 90 ' 04 " 

Overflow via town storm sewer Class C 

02 5 Building 205 Cooling Tower Genesee River 43°12 ' 10 " 

Blowdown and Sto rm water via Class B 77c 39 ' 20 " 

city storm sewer 

035 Building 32 0 Cooling Tower Genesee River 43°11'44" 

Blowdown and Storm wat.er via Class B 77 ' 39 ' 38 " 

c ity storm sewer 

109 Bui lding 601 Cooling Tower Paddy Hill 43°10'5 4" 

Blowdown and Storm water via Creek 77 °40 '4 9" 

ci ty storm sewer Class C 
I GROUPED OUTFALLS I 

101 ·43°11'17" Paddy Hill Storm water drainage 002, 005. 017, 019, 021 , 

7r40'49" Creek, Class C f fa m rooftops, 022, 023, 024, 026, 027, 

roadways, shipping and 028. 029, 030, 031, 033, 

106 43'11'00" Paddy Hill receiving areas in non- 038, 039, 044, 056, 057, 

77'40'49" Creek, Class C chemical handling 059, 066, 077, 078, 079, 

areas via highway 089, 090, 091, 092, 094, 

drainage ditch. 096, 099, 100, 102, 103, 

104, 106, 107, 108, 110, 

111, 112, 113, 117, 120, 121 

115 43°11'52" Genesee River, Storm water drainage 012,013,095,098 

77'39'17" Class B fro m rooftops, 

roadways, shipping and 

43°12'05" Genesee River, receiving areas in 

77'38'30" Class B chemical handling 

areas via city storm 

sewer 

119 43'11'47" Paddy H ill Drainage from and 118 

7]040'49" Creek, Class C adjacent to the Weiland 

Rd. Inorganic Landfill 

and storm water 

rete ntion pond via 

highway drainage ditch. 

INDIVIDUAL OUTFALLS 

062 43°11 '55" Paddy Hill Storm water runoff and 

77°40'47" Creek, Class C drainage from areas 

around 8-329/349/333 

vehicle maintenance 

and storage via highway 

drainage ditch. 

114 43'1 2'07" Genesee River, Storm water runoff and 

77' 38'01" Class 8 drainage from north side 

of 8-53, fuel unloading 

area via city storm 

sewer. 
Outfall Number & 

Effluent Parameter 

Discharge Limitations 

Daily Avg. Daily Max. Units 

Monitoring Requirements 

Measurement Sample 

Frequency Type 

001 • King's Landing Effluent Process Wastewater (and water from associated activities) and storm water 21 

CONVENTIONALS, NON-CONVENTIONALS 

Ammonia (as NH3) 

(July-Oct.)' 

Ammonia (as NHJ) 

(Nov.-June)' 

Biochemical Oxygen Demand' 

(5 day) 

Color 

Flow 

Oil & Grease's 

pH' 

Phosphorous 

Settleable Solids (normal) Settleable Solids3 (maintenance) 

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen1 

Total Organic Carbon \ Total Suspended SoHds3(maintenance) Total Suspended Solids (normal) 

Ultimate Oxygen Demand,34820 

Surrogate (maintenance) 

Ultimate Oxygen Demand,482o 

Surrogate (normal) 

Footnotes on pages 8 and 9 

4000 4500 IbsJd 

Monitor 6500 IbsJd Monitor Monitor IbsJd 

Monitor CU 

Monitor Monitor MGD Monitor 15 mg/l 

6 - 8.5 (range) SU 

1.0 mg/l 

Monitor 0.8 mill Monitor 1.4 mUI 

3100 Monitor IbsJd 

Monitor Momtor Ibs/d 

13000 35000 IbsJd 13000 22000 IbsJd 

21000 35000 IbsJd 

21000 31500 Ibs/d 

3 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. 

3 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. 3 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. 

Monthly 24 hr. Camp. 

Continuous Recorder 

1 per 8 days Grab 

Continuous Recorder 

Footnote 2 7 day Camp. 

1 per 8 days 24 hr. Compo 

1 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. 

3 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. 3 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. 

Daily 24 hr. Camp. 

Daily 24 hr. Camp. 

3 per 8 days Calculated 3 per 8 days Calculated 
Outfall Number & 

Effluent Parameter 

Discharge Limitations 

Daily Avg. Daily Max. Units 

Minimum 

Monitoring Requirements 

Measurement Sample 

Frequency Type 

001 • King's Landing Effluent, Process Wastewater (and water from associated activities) and storm water 21 

INORGANICS 

Aluminum {total)6 140 Monitor Ibs/d Footnote 2 7 day,24 hr.Comp 

Antimony (totalt 51 Monitor Ibs/d Footnote 2 7 day,24 hr. Camp Arsenic (total) 10 Monitor Ibs/d Footnote 2 7 day,24 hr.Comp 

Barium (total)6 55 Monitor Ibs/d Footnote 2 7 daY,24 hr.Comp 

Cadmium (total) Monitor 4.8 Ibs/d Footnote 2 7 daY, 24 hr.Comp Chromium (total) 12 25 Ibs/d Footnote 2 7 daY ,24 hr.Comp Cobalt (total) 11 Ibs/d 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. Copper (total) 18 38 Ibs/d Footnote 2 7 daY,24 hr.Comp Cyanide (free)17 12 Ibsld 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. 

Cyanide (total) 19 22 Ibs/d 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. 

Dissolved Solids (total)9 240,000 Monitor Ibsld 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. 

Fluoride6 5 mg/l 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Compo 

Iron (total) Monitor 270 Ibsld Footnote 2 7 day ,24 hr. Camp 

Lead (Iolal) Monitor 20 Ibs/d Footnote 2 7 daY,24 hr.Comp 

ftotal\ 310 Monitor ih"kl F,i(,I,-,,-,f .... ? .. , . 2.1 . h .. r ."r" , " 

Mercury Monitor 0.3 Ibs/d 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Compo 

Nickel (total) 17 50 Ibs/d Footnote 2 7 day,24 hr.Comp 

Silver (total) 35 50 Ibs/d. Footnote 2 7 day,24 hr.Comp 

Tin (total)6 110 Monitor Ibs/d Footnote 2 7 daY, 24 hr.Comp 

Vanadium (total)6 9.5 Monitor Ibs/d Footnote 2 7 daY,24 hr.Comp 

Z inc (total) 100 180 Ibs/d Footnote 2 7 day,24 hr.Comp 

Footnotes on pages 8 and 9 
Outfall Number & 

Effluent Parameter 

Discharge Limitations 

Daily Avg. Daily Max. Units 

Minimum 

Monitoring Requirements 

Measurement Sample 

Frequency Type --'-'--

001 - King's Landing Effluent. Process Wastewater (and water from associated activities) and storm water 21 

ORGANICS 

Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether 0.80 Monitor IbsJd Quarterly 24 hr. Compo 

Chloroform 5.4 12.3 Ibs/d 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. 

1,2-DichloroethaneI6 16 25 IbsJd 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. 

1 ,1-Dichtoroethylene 1.9 IbsJd Quarterly 24 hr. Compo 

Dichloromethane 16 27 52 Ibs/d 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. 

1 ,2-Dichloropropane 16 13 31 Jbs/d 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. 

1 A-Diethylene dioxide11 .13 I e 204 Monitor Ibs/d 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. 

N,N Dimethylaniline 27 130 lbsJd 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Compo 

Dimethyl terephthalate Monitor Jbs/d Semi-Annual 24 hr. Compo 

2,6-Dinitrototuene 1 9 Ibs/d Quarterly 24 hr. Camp. 

Ethylene glycol'4 1300 Ibs/d Monthly 24 hr. Compo 

Hydroquinone's 13.1 Jbs/d Twice/Monthly 24 hr Compo 

2-Methyl-1 ,3 dioxolane6 59 Monitor Ibs/d 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Compo 

Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin22 100 P9i1 Monthly 24 hr. Compo 2-

Phenoxyethanol" 87 Monitor Ibs/d 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. 

Phenolics Aggregate? 13 Monitor Ibs/d 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Compo 

Pyridine Monitor 41 Ibs/d 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Compo 

Styrene Monitor Ibs/d Semi-Annual 24 hr. Comp _ 

T etrahydrofuran 12 101 Monitor IbsJd 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. 

Toluene Monitor Ibs/d Semi-Annual 24 hr. Compo 

Total Chlorinated Phenolics1o 2.7 Monitor Ibs/d 1 per 8 days 24 hr Comp_ 

63 Monitor Ibs/d 1 per 8 da'f s ?4 hr (:()nPl) 

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5 Monitor Ibs/d 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Camp. 

T riphenyl phosphate 9.0 Ibs/d Quarterly 24 hr. Compo 

Xylene (tota!) Monitor 12 Ibs/d 1 per 8 days 24 hr. Compo 

Footnotes on pages 8 and 9 
3. The maintenance limitations apply during certain Department approved periods of scheduled maintenance. The normal limits 

apply at all other times. For the maintenance period limitations to be in effect, the Company will require written notification of 

approval from the Department. It has been predetermined that maintenance limits will only be approved for periods scheduled 

between and including the months of November to June. 

4. The Ultimate Oxygen Demand Surrogate (UODs) is defined as the calculated Biochemical Oxygen Demand exerted in 28 days 

and shall be calculated by the fallowing equation (all concentrations are in mgfl): 

Where 

TKN 

TOC 

= measured Biochemical Oxygen Demand (5 day); 

= measured Total KjeJdahl Nitrogen: and 

= measured Total Organic Carbon. 

5. 'M1en pH is continuously recorded , the permittee shall be allowed excursions from the designated, allowable pH range, subject 

to the following conditions: 

(a) The total time during which pH values of each discharge are outside the required range shall not exceed 7 hours and 

26 minutes in any calendar month and no individual excursion shall exceed 60 minutes in duration. 

(b) No excursion shall cause or contribute to a contravention of water quality standards. 

6. The limitation for this parameter becomes effective after six months after the effective date of this permit unless Kodak requests 

and DEC determines that such limitation should be modified based on the result of effluent monitoring gathered prior to six 

months after the effective date of this permit (Completed 3/1195). 

7 . "Phenolics Aggregate" is the sum of the measured concentrations of the fallowing substances: Phenol, Cresols (all isomers). 

2,4·Di·t·pentylphenol. 4,4' Butylidenebis (6·t·butyl-m·cresol) and 2,4 Dimethyl phenol. 

8. The Ultimate Oxygen Demand Surrogate (UODs) is an indicator for Acetaldehyde, Acetone, Acetic acid, BOD5, N-Butanol. Secbutanol, Cyclohexane, Ethanol, Ethyl acetate, Ethyl acrylate, Ethylene glycol monobutyl ether, Glycerine, N-Heptane, NHexane, Isobutano\, Isopropanol, Methanol, 2·Methoxy ethanol, Methyl acrylate, Methyl ethyl ketone and Methyl isobutyl 

ketone. 

9. Dissolved Solids (total) is an indicator for Bromide. Calcium, Carbonate, Chlorides, Magnesium, Nitrate-Nitrite, Potassium, 

Sodium, Sulfate, Sulfide and Sulfite. 

Dlmethylphenol and 2,4-Dichlorophenol. 

-, ". v, ",t:: , "'t::dll",It::'-' ........ 11< ... ;:lIlI d [;OIl:;. VI IUhUWHly :;.uu:;.\a(lws. 4-Cmutu-";',5 

11 . Within 6 months of the effective date of this permit, the permittee shall submit to the Department small scale treatability studies 

for this substance. At the same time, the permittee shall submit a full scale treatability study demonstrating the substance's 

susceptIbility to activated sludge treatment at Kings landing Wastewater Purification Plant under normal operating conditions 

(Completed 3/1195). 

12. Within 6 months of the effective date of this permit, the permittee shall submit a full scale treatability study demonstrating the 

substance's susceptibility to activated sludge treatment at Kings landing Wastewater Purification Plant under normal operating 

conditions (Completed 3/1/95). 

13. Within three months of the effective date of this permit, the permittee shall submit the results of an effluent specific MDUPQl 

study for this substance using EPA method 625 (Completed 12/1/94). 
16. The permittee will perform a quarterly integrity study on the vae sample container for a period of one year after EDP. 

(Completed 8/31195) , 

17. The Weak Acid Dissociable Analytical method shall be used to monitor compliance with this limit. 18. The limitation for this parameter becomes effective after six months after the effective date of this permit modification unless 

Kodak requests and DEC determines that such limitation should be modified based on the result of effluent monitoring gathered 

prior to six months after the effective date of this permit modification. 

19. The permittee shall endeavor to achieve the Method Detection Level (MOL), and Method Level (ML) or Practical Quantification 

level (POL), published by the DEC andior EPA using approved test methods as specified in 40 CFR Part 136 for this 

parameter. The permittee may develop matrix specific MDls and Mls/PQls using test methods set forth in 40 CFR Part 136 

Appendix S where it is unable to achieve the published MOL and MUPQL. A permit limit shall not be set higher than a MUPQL 

for a site-specific matrix. The permit limit will be the highest ofthe EPA published MUPQl, matrix specific MUPQL, or the limit 

specified in this permit. 

20. The permittee may submit studies of monitoring data and request modifications to the equation used to calculate the Ultimate 

Oxygen Oemand Surrogate (UODJ value as additional data is gathered. 

21 . Sanitary sewage may be diverted to the King's Landing Wastewater Treatment Plant for treatment under two conditions: 

i) During an emergency situation: An emergency is defined as an unplanned event (e.g. sewer line break , pump station 

failure) that causes a situation which could threaten human health or the environment due to the presence of sanitary 

waste. Kodak shall notify the DEC and the Monroe County Department of Health (MCDOH) when this situation occurs , 

and make every effort to complete the necessary repairs expeditiously in order to minimize the time required for King's 

Landing to treat sanitary waste. If the emergency occurs between June 1 and September 30, Kodak will monitor the 

King's Landing discharge for fecal coliform if directed to do so by MCDOH. Kodak shall report the results of this 

monitoring to the MCDOH. 

ii) For Planned Sanitary Sewer System Maintenance: During the period between October I " and May 31 ,Kodak must 

notify the DEC and the MCDOH at least 2 weeks in advance of the planned maintenance activity which will result in 

sanitary sewage being diverted to King's Landing. The volume of sanitary wastewater may not exceed 1% of the 

average annual daily volume received at Kings landing and must receive the same treatment as industrial wastewater. 

Kodak must make every effort to complete the necessary repairs expeditiously in order to minimize the time required 

22. The permittee shall analyze the effluent from the King's Landing WNTP for the 17 chlorinated d!benzo-p-dioxins and chlorinated 

dibenzofurans listed in 6 NYCRR Part 703.5. The permittee shall use USEPA Method 1613B for all analysis and shall instruct 

the lab to strive to obtain the MOL and MLs (Minimum Levels, the lowest quantitation levels) listed in that Method. The ML 

based effluent limit for octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on page 7 shall be used to assess compliance when the required PMP (page 

13A) has been completed. During the implementation of the PMP, the interim limit established in the PMP shall be used to 

assess compliance. Due to extended laboratory analysis times, the results shall be submitted within one month after they are 

received from the analytical laboratory and Kodak analytical laboratory personnel have done a ONQC check of the results. 

The permittee shall summarize Ihe sampling results, the month in which the samples were taken, the calculated SEO, and 

detection levels achieved to this Department as an attachment 10 the Discharge Monitoring Report. Because this data is being 

submitted as an attachment, it can be in a format other than that specified in the Departmenfs most recent DMR Manual. 
If discharges of any substance exceed their respective action level: 

(1) for four of six consecutive samples, or (2) for two of six consecutive samples by 20% or more, or 

(3) for any 1 sample by 50% or more 

the permittee shall undertake a short-term, high-intensity monitoring program for this parameter. Samples identical to 

those required for routine monitoring purposes shall be taken on each of three consecutive operating days and 

analyzed. Results shall be expressed in terms of both concentration and mass. and shall be submitted no later than 

the end of the third month following the month when any of the criteria listed above was met. Results may be 

appended to a DMR or transmitted under separate cover to the same address. If levels higher than the action levels 

are confirmed the permit may be reopened by the Department for consideration of revised action levels, effluent limits 

or other permit conditions. 

The permittee is not authorized to discharge any pollutants at levels which may cause or contribute to a violation of 

water quality standards, Including those listed below 

Outfall No. QQ.L 

Effluent Parameter 

Sis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 

Di-N-butyl phthalate 

Action Level 

10.3 

3.2 

Minimum Monitoring Requirements 

Measurement Frequency Sample Tvpe 

Ibs/d Semi-Annual Ibs/d Semi-Annual 

24 hr. Compo 

24 hr. Compo 
Outfall 

1!Q{§l. 

001 

Effluent Parameter 

Effluent Toxicity{a) 

Monitoring Requirements 

Units 

% Effluent(b) 

Measurement 

Frequency 

Quarterly(c) 

Sample 

24 hour(dlle) 

composite! 

renewal 

(a) Effluent toxicity shall mean the toxicity of the effluent in chronic test method numbers 1000.0 and 

1002.0 as specified in Short- Term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving 

Waters to Freshwater Organisms, Second Edition, EPAl60Q/4·89J001 (1989) or most recent edition 

(herein referred to as the EPA Manual). Both a vertebrate and invertebrate species shall be used for 

the tests. Dilution water shall be collected according to the EPA Manual. Each test run shall be 

'bracketed' with a test of pure effluent and a test of effluent diluted sufficiently such that the diluted 

sample shows no toxic effects. Appropriate dilutions bet'Neen the endpoints shall be tested to allow 

calculation of the Maximum Allowable Waste Concentration. Receiving water shall be used as dilution 

water unless the Department approves a different source. Effluent sampling and holding shall be 

done as outlined in Section 8 of the EPA Manual. Any deviation from procedures in the EPA Manual 

requires prior written approval by the Department. 

(b) The Maximum Allowable Waste Concentration (MAWC) in % Effluent, for both a vertebrate and an 

invertebrate species, shall be determined and reported. Also, the 48 hour lC50 value shall be 

determined and reported. The MAWC in % Effluent shall be compared to the calculated Instream 

Waste Concentration (IWC) of the effluent. The IWC in % Effluent shall be determined using the daily 

average effluent flow at the time of sampling and a critical receiving water flow of 368 cubic feet per 

second forthe Genesee River (001). 

(c) The results of each toxicity test shall be submitted no later than 60 days following the end of each test 

period. These reports shall be submitted to the Regional Water Engineer at 6274 E. Avon-lima Road, 

Avon, NY 14414-9519 and the Toxicity Testing Unit, Bureau of Watershed Assessment and 

Research, 625 Broadway, Albany , NY 12233-3502. 

(d) Monitoring of chemical and physical parameters limited in this permit shall be coordinated so that the 

resulting analysis is also representative of the samples used for toxicity testing. 

(e) When wastewater directed to Outfall 001 is being chlorinated, samples shall be collected prior to 

:;: j,,:;1"\;;::;;:-,.:.: .... d !,:; !v .... ;,:;;t1 !cst;'-,9 cv",iu",t;..:.r •. 

(f) The June 2004 permit modification does not reset the toxiCity testing starting date. The permittee shall 

continue the existing schedule for toxicity testing. 
p

q

p

p

p

accordance with the following schedule: 

Outfall 

Number(s} Compliance Action Due Date 

001 

• 

Submission of a proposal for a Toxicity 

Reduction Evaluation (TREr proposed to the 

Department of Environmental Conservation, 

Bureau of Water Permits, 625 Broadway, 

Albany, New York, 12233-3505 

45 days after letter notification 

from Regional Water Engineer 

The TRE proposal shall be directed towards identifying the source of the toxicity, describing 

procedures to reduce the toxicity to an acceptable level, identifying monitoring parameters suitable for 

insuring control of the toxicity, and proposing a schedule of compliance. 

Within 14 days of receipt of written approval of the TRE proposal by DEC Region 8 Water Engineer, 

the permittee shall implement the approved TRE proposal in accordance with the approved 

compliance schedule. 

The completed TRE, including data findings and recommendations for corrective action, permit limits, 

and proposed self-monitoring requirements shall be submitted. The Department will review the TRE 

and may redraft the permit to incorporate one or more of the following, consistent with the provisions of applicable law and regulation: substance specific numerical limits, toxicity limits, monitoring 

requirements, andlor a schedule of compliance that will ensure acceptable toxicity levels of the 

effluent 

(b) The permittee shall submit to the Department of Environmental Conservation the TRE proposal 

required in (a) above by the given date(s), and a written notice of compliance or noncompliance with 

the above schedule date(s) postmarked no later than 14 days following that letter notification from 

Regional Water Engineer. Each notice of the noncompliance shall include the following information: 

1. A short description of the noncompliance; 

2. A description of any actions taken or proposed by the permittee to comply with the elapsed 

schedule requirement without further delay; 

4. An estimate of the date permittee will comply with the elapsed schedule requirement and an 

assessment of the probability that permittee will meet the next schedule requirement on time. 
The permittee shall endeavor to achieve the Method Detection Levels (MOL) and Practical OuanlltatJon Levels (POL) published by DEC 

in Analytical Detectability and Ouanlitation Guidelines for Selected Environmental Parameters using EPA and/or DEC approved test 

procedures as specified in 40 CFR Part 136 (or in the SPDES Permit). The permittee may develop matrix specific MDls and POls using 

procedures set forth in 40 CFR Part 136 Appendix B where it is unable to achieve the published paLs or MOLs. 

PRODUCT STEWARDSHIP 

During this permit term. the permittee may seek to accept for reuse , recycling and/or treatment, byproducts and/or wastes generated during 

use of the products of Eastman Kodak Company, including all its divisions and subsidiaries (hereinafter referred to as "Product 

Stewardship"). If a Product Stewardship project may effect the permittee's discharges under this permit. the permittee shall proceed in 

accordance with the reapplication and notice requirements contained in 6NYCRR Part 750. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION 

During this permit term, the permittee may have significant opportunities to reduce or prevent pollution. The permittee may request a 

higher effluent limitation(s) for a constituent(s) at an Outfall(s) covered by this Permit as long as: 

• all legal and regulatory requirements will continue to be met; and 

• a demonstrable net reduction of a constituent discharged to the environment will result: or 

• in the case of chemical substitution andlor process modification, a demonstratable net reduction in the potential toxicity of the 

constituents being discharged will result. 

Discharges to the environment can encompass emissions to all media. Nothing contained in this condition shall be construed as 

committing the Department to grant the permittee's request. The permittee may not commence any discharge which is the subject of its 

request pursuant to this Condition, until the Department has approved said request. 

WATER TREATMENT CHEMICAL USE IN COOLING TOWERS 

The permittee shall submit Form WTC, Water Treatment Chemical (WTC) Usage Notification for SPDES Permittees, for any proposed 

WTC(s) prior to use at Outfalls other than Outfall 001. The permittee may use a new or reformulated water treatment chemical at any 

cooling tower which subsequently discharges to Outfall 001 without submittal of Form me provided that the chemical meets the following 

conditions: 

1. The permittee has NOEC or LOEC concentrations for the proposed me for both a vertebrate and invertebrate species. An analysis 

of the NOEC and LOEC concentrations, assuming the WTC is conservative, shows that the maximum proposed use of the proposed WTC 

is not toxic to either species in 100% effluent: 

2. Any and all parameters and degradation products in the wrc that are subject to promulgated water quality standards and/or guidance 

values as listed in TOGS 1.1.1 are currenlly induded as either limits, Action Levels, or included under surrogate parameters for Outfall 

001 In thiS permit; 

4. The discharge shall not cause or contribute to a violation of water quality or an exceedance of an Ambient Water Quality Criterion. 

Should any of the above conditions not be met by the proposed WTC, the permittee shall submit Form WTC to this Department for approval 

of the proposed mc. 

The permittee shall maintain a logbook of all mc use, noting for each chemical the time, amount and location of each dosage. 

Documentation must be available to demonstrate that adequate process controls are in place to ensure that excessive levels of wrCs 

are not used and subsequently dJscharged. The use of logbooks shall begin no later than May 1, 1 998. All logbooks shall be maintained 

for two years. 

The permittee shalt provide an annual summary report. attached to the December OMR, containing the following information: the current 

Jist of WTCs authorized for use and discharge by the Department, for each WTC the amount in pounds used during the year, and any other 

pertinent information. The 1998 annual report must include usage information beginning no later than May I, 1998. Annual reports 

thereafter will be for the entire year. 
2. Within fifteen (15) months of 0310112005, the completed, approvable PMP plan shall be submitted to the Regional Water 

Engineer al the address listed under the section of this permit entitled RECORDING. REPORTING AND ADDITIONAL 

MONITORING REQUIREMENTS and to the Bureau of Water Permits, NYSDEC, 625 Broadway, Albany NY 12233·3505, 

3. Subsequent modifications or renewal of this permit does not reset or revise the deadline set forth in number 1 above unless a new 

deadline is set explicitly by such a permit modification or renewal. 

4 . The PMP plan shall be documented in narrative form and shall include any necessary plot plans, drawings or maps. Other 

documents already prepared for the facility such as a Safety Manual or a Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) 

plan or Best Management Practices Plan (8MP) may be used as part of the plan and may be incorporated by reference. As a 

minimum, the plan shall indude: 

a. An on·going potential source identification, evaluatIon, prioritization and reduction program; 

b. Periodic monitoring of the influent and effluent from Kings Landing WNTP as detailed In item 6. below to quantify 

and, over time. track the reduction of discharges of the substances noted above; 

c. An approvable schedule for submission of an approvable control strategy for reduCing discharges via cost·effective 

control measures. including but not limited to source remediation and treatment plant modifications for the substances 

noted in (1 .) above. The schedule for submission of a control strategy will become enforceable under this permit. The 

control strategy and the schedule for implementation of the control strategy will also become enforceable under this 

permit; and 

4.1 An annual status report that summarizes all source monitoring and all control measures implemented during the previouscatendar 

year shall be prepared and submitted to the Regional Water Engineer by March 1 of each year. 

5. The PMP plan shall be reviewed and modified, if necessary. whenever changes at the facility increase the potential for discharge 

of dibenzo·p·dioxinsand dibenzofurans or when new information obtained during the ongoing investigation indicates that the plan 

should be modified 

6. The permittee shall analyze the influent and effluent (monthly) from the Kings Landing VWVTP for the 17 chlorinated dibenzo·p· 

dioxins and chlorinated dibenzofurans listed in 6NYCRR Part 703.5. The permittee shall use US EPA Method 16138 for all 

analysis and shall instruct the lab to strive to obtain the MLs (Minimum Levels, the lowest quantitation levels) listed in that Method. 

The Sample Type shall be a 24 hr comp for both influent and effluent. The interim effluent limit and monitoring requirements 

for octachlorodibenzo-p..c:fioxln during the PMP compliance period shall be as follows : 

Outfall Number & Discharge Limitations Measurement Sample 

____ 

.• .::,vq. Dailv Max Units Frequency Tyoe 

001 . King's Landing Effluent 

Octachlorodibenzo·p-dioxin NA 400 pgll Monthly 1daY,24 hr.Comp 

7. Due to extended laboratory analysis times, the results shall be submitted within one month after they are received from the 

anatyticallaboratory and Kodak analytical laboratory personnel have done a QAlQC check of the results. The permittee shall 

summarize the sampling results, the month in which the samples were taken , the calculated BEQ, and the detection levels 

achieved to thiS Department as an attachment to their Discharge Monitoring Report. Because this data is being submitted as an 

attachment, it can be in a format other than that specified in the Department's most recent DMR Manual. 
the discharges from the permitted facility shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below: 

Outfall Number & Discharge Limitations 

=E"ff"lu"e"n,,1 Pc.a",r"a"m"e"le:::r. ______ Daily Avg. Daily Max. Units 

003· Non-Contact Cooling Water and Storm Water 

Ammonia (as NH3) 1.5 

pH10 6.0 - 9.0 (range) 

Oil & Grease'O ', 15 

Temperature 10 90 

Flow Monitor Footnote one Substances' Monitor 

004 - Non-Contact Cool ing Water and Storm Water 

Ammonia (as NH3) 1.5 

pH 6 - 9.5 (range) 

Oil & Grease11 15 

Temperature 90 

Flow Monitor Footnote one Substances1 Monitor 

006 - Non-Contact Cooling Water and Storm Water, Pump Station Overflow 

Ammonia (as NH3) 15 

pH 6.0 - 9 .0 (Range) 

Oil & Grease" 15 

Temperature 90 

Flow Monitor 

Note: The referenced footnotes are located on page 17. 

Minimum 

Monitoring Requirements 

Measurement Sample 

Frequency .....:.TL!yp:::e'---__ _ 

mg/l Quarterly 24 hr. Compo 

SU Quarterly Grab 

mg/l Quarterly Grab 

Deg. F Quarterly Grab MGD Quarterly Estimate'6 

mg/l Quarterly 24 hr. Compo mgll Monthly Grab 

SU Monthly Grab 

mg/l Monthly Grab 

Deg. F Monthly Grab MGD Monthly 

mg/l Twice per year Grab 

mgtl Each Discharge Grab'2 

SU Each Discharge Grab'2 

mgtl Each Discharge Grab'2 

Deg. F Each Discharge Grab'2 

MGD Each Discharge Estimate14 
the discharges from the permitted facility shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below: 

Outfall Number & Discharge Limitations 

:E"ffl.::u:.:e:co:c, ,-P.:a.::ra:::m.::e:.t:.:e.::r ______ Dai Iy A vg. D ai Iy Max, Units 

Outfall 025 - Building 205 Cooling Tower Blowdown and Storm water 

Flow 

pH 

Temperature 

Monitor 

6-9.5 (range) SU 

Monitor 

Outfall 035 - Building 320 Cooling Tower Blowdown and Storm water 

Flow 

pH 

Temperature 

Molybdenum 

Monitor 

6-9.5 (range) SU 

Monitor Monitor 

Outfall 109 - -Building 601 Cooling Tower Blowdown and Storm water 

Flow Monitor 

pH 6-9.5 (range) SU 

Residual Chlorine (total)15 0.5 

Temperature Monitor 

Molybdenum Monitor 

Minimum 

Monitoring Requirements 

Measurement Sample 

Frequency Type -"--

GPO Quarterly 

Quarterly Grab 

OF Monthly 

GPO Quarterly 

Quarterly Grab 

OF Monthly 

mgll Quarterly 

GPO Quarterly 

Quarterly Grab 

mg/I Quarterly OF Monthly 

mgll Quarterly 

Estimate 

Grab 

Estimate 

Grab Grab 

Estimate 

Grab Grab Grab 
Routine action level monitoring results, if not provided for on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) form, shall 

be appended to the DMR for the period during which the sampling was conducted. If submission of DMR's is not required 

by this permit, the results shall be maintained in accordance with instructions on the RECORDING, REPORTING AND 

MONITORING page of this permit. 

If any of the action levels are exceeded, the permittee shall undertake a short-term, high-intensity monitoring 

program for this parameter. Samples identical to those required for routine monitoring purposes shall be taken on each 

of at least three operating days and analyzed. Results shall be expressed in terms of both concentration and mass, and 

shall be submitted no later than the end of the third month following the month when the action level was first exceeded. 

Results may be appended to the DMR or transmitted under separate cover to the addresses listed on the RECORDING, 

REPORTING AND MONITORING page of this permil. If levels higher than the actions levels are confirmed the permit 

may be reopened by the Department for consideration of revised action levels or effluent limits. 

The permittee is not authorized to discharge any of listed parameters at levels which may cause or contribute to 

a violation of water quality standards. 

Minimum Monitoring Requirements 

Outfall Number & Effluent Parameter Action level Units Measurement Frequency Sample Type 

003 - Non-Contact Cooling Water and Storm water 

50 mg/l Quarterly 24 hr. 

004 - Non-Contact Cooling Water and Storm water 

50 mgll Monthly Grab 

006 - Non-Contact Cooling Water and Storm water, Pump Station Overflow9 

50 mg/l Each Discharge 

Footnotes on page 17. 
N-Butanol and Methyl isobutyl ketone. 

2. This requirement has been eliminated based upon the elimination of the Weiland Road Landfill Leachate Pump Station 

Emergency Overflow. 

3. When TOC action level is exceeded, the sample which exceeded the TOC action level shall also be analyzed for Footnote one 

substances. Therefore, samples shall be collected of sufficient volume and in such a manner that, when the TOC action level 

is exceeded, the sample may also be analyzed for Footnote one substances. 

4. The high intensity monitoring program shall be for footnote one substances as well as TOC. 

5. Dissolved Solids (total) is an indicator for Bromide. Calcium, Carbonate, Chlorides, Magnesium, Nitrate-Nitrite, Potassium, 

Sodium. Sulfate, Sulfide and Sulfite. 

6. Superceded. 

7. Superceded. 

8. No longer applicable (TOO method superseded by TOC monitoring). 

9. For the purposes of monitoring required for this Outfall, daily sampling is any sample collected during any consecutive 24 hour 

period and a calendar day is any consecutive 24 hour period. 

10. All grab samples for Outfall 003 shall be obtained from the M-57 composite sampler using the 'manual" mode. 

11. The permittee shall endeavor to achieve the Method Detection Level (MOL), and Method Level (ML) or Practical Ouantification 

Level (POL), published by the DEC andlor EPA using approved test methods as specified in 40 CFR Part 136 for this 

parameter. The permittee may develop matrix specific MDLs and Mis/POLs using test methods set forth in 40 CFR Part 136 

Appendix B where it is unable to achieve the published MOL and MUPQL. A permit limit shall not be set higher than a MUPOL 

for a site-specific matrix. The permit limit will be the highest of the EPA published MUPOL, matrix specific MUPQL, or the limit 

speCified in this permit. 

12. The permittee has the option of taking a composite sample of the Outfall 006 overflow for purposes of compliance monitoring. 

The permittee must indicate the sample type taken on the Discharge Monitoring Report for this Outfall. 

13. Superceded. 14. The maximum rlAily flow from OutfAll 004 for p,ach month shall be estimated during each discharge usir!g a method '.'Jhich 

applies good engineering Judgement. 

15. The sampling, analysis, and effluent limits for these parameters applies only during monitoring periods when a cooling tower 

is discharging to the subject Outfall. 

, 6. Flow is to be measured, or estimated. each day that a compl iance sample is collected. If flow is estimated, or if flow 

measurements are made for less than 24 hours, the estimate or measurement is to be done using a method, which applies 

good engineering judgment. 
Number Parameter Type 

5 (Units) 

003 Toxicity (% The possibility of complex or synergistic Quarterly, during calendar 24 hr. 

Effluent) interactions of chemicals; minimal dilution years ending in 05 AND 00 Composit 

available in receiving stream e/static 

renewal 

1. The effluent toxicity monitoring program shall begin in the first quarter of the years noted in the table above. 

Subsequent modification or renewal of this permit does not reset or revise the deadline(s) set forth in the 

preceding sentence unless a new deadline is set explicitly by such modification or renewal. 

2 The results of each toxicity test shall be submitted no later than 60 days following the end of each test period, 

These reports shall be submitted to the NYS DEC Regional Water Engineer at 6274 E. Avon·Lima Road, Avon, 

NY 14414·9519 and to the Toxicity Testing Unit, Bureau of Watershed Assessment and Research, 625 

Broadway, Albany, NY 12233·3502. 

3. Effluent Toxicity shall mean the toxicity of the effluent in acute static renewal tests specified as Tier 1 testing 

in Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine 

Organisms, Fourth Edition, EPAl600/4·90l027F (1993) or most recent edition (herein referred to as the EPA 

Acute Manual). Both a vertebrate and invertebrate species shall be used for the tests. Where the outfall 

being tested discharges to estuarine or ocean waters, the marine organisms shall be tested. Where the 

outfall being tested discharges to fresh waters, freshwater organisms shall be tested. Dilution water shall be 

collected according to the EPA Acute Manual. Receiving water shall be used as dilution water unless the 

Department approves a different source. Effluent sampling and holding shall be done as outlined in the EPA 

Acute Manual, and should consist of 24 hour composite samples. Any deviation from procedures in the EPA Acute Manual requires prior written approval by the Department. 

4. The 48·hour EC50 and 48·hour LC50 in % Effluent for both a vertebrate and an invertebrate species shall be 

determined and reported in accordance with the specified frequency. The 48-hour EC50 and 48-hour LC50 in 

% Effluent shall be compared to the Instream Waste Concentration (IWC) of the effluent calculated based on 

the daily average effluent flow at the time of the test and the critical flow in Paddy Hill Creek of cubic feet per 

second (cfs). 

5. VVhere practicable, monitoring of chemical and physical parameters limited in this permit shall be coordinated 

so that the resulting analysis is also representative of the sample used for toxicity testing. 

6_ Discharges which use chlorination as part of the waste treatment process for disinfection should be 

;;;,cr:o tOX:CIt).' tc:;tir, g -:;a;;"ptes sl',a::;:'2 tak;;r; ;""" edioteiy pi-i.:;..- ::.:;. the ch:u,'i'-iot;Gi-1 

7_ In accordance with NYSDEC guidance, the Department may require the permittee to conduct additional 

toxicity testing. If such additional testing is necessary, the permittee shall be notified in writing by the NYS 

DEC Regional Water Engineer. The written notification shall include the reason(s) why such testing is 

required. 
Number Parameters Type 

003 

1 . 

2. 

3. 

4. 

6. 

7 

(Units) 

Toxicity The possibility of complex or synergistic Quarterly, as directed by the 24 hr. 

(% Effluent) interactions of chemicals; minimal Regional Water Engineer Composite! 

dilution available in receiving stream static 

renewal 

The permittee shall implement this effluent toxicity monitoring program beginning in the first month of the first 

full calendar quarter, i.e. January, April, July, or October, that is within 3 months of written notification from 

the NYSDEC Regional Water Engineer that chronic toxicity testing is necessary. The written notification will 

include the reasons why the chronic toxicity testing program is necessary and the sample frequency. 

The results of each toxicity test shall be submitted no later than 60 days following the end of each test period. 

These reports shall be submitted to the NYS DEC Regional Water Engineer at 6274 E. Avon·Lima Road, Avon, 

NY 14414·9519 and to the Toxicity Testing Unit, Bureau of Watershed Assessment and Research, 625 

Broadway, Albany, NY 12233-3502. 

Effluent toxicity shall mean the toxicity of the effluent in chronic static renewal tests as specified in Short-Term 

Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms, Third 

Edition, EPAl600/4·91/002 (1994), the EPA Chronic Manual for Marine Organisms (EPAl600/4-91/003(1994), 

or the most recent editions (herein referred to as the EPA Chronic Manuals). Both a vertebrate and 

invertebrate species shall be used for the tests. V\lhere the outfall being tested discharges to estuarine or 

ocean waters, marine organisms shall be tested. Where the outfall being tested discharges to fresh waters, 

freshwater organisms shall be tested. Each test run shall be 'bracketed' with a test of pure effluent and a test 

of effluent diluted sufficiently such that at least one diluted sample shows no toxic effects. Appropriate 

dilutions between the endpoints shall be tested to allow calculation of the Maximum Allowable Waste 

Concentration. Dilution water shall be collected according to the EPA Chronic Manuals. Receiving water shall 

be used as dilution water unless the Department approves a different source. Effluent sampling and holding 

shall be done as outlined in of the EPA Chronic Manuals. Any deviation from procedures in the EPA Chronic 

Manuals requires prior written approval by the Department. 

The Maximum Allowable Waste Concentration (MAWC) in % Effluent, for both a vertebrate and an 

invertebrate species, shall be determined and reported. The MAWC in % Effluent shall be compared to the 

calculated Instream Waste Concentration (IWC) of the effluent. The IWC in % Effluent shall be determined 

using the daily average effluent flow at the time of sampling and a critical receiving water flow of cubic feel 

per second forPaddy Hill Creek. 

;"';iO;1;tO ... . "g Jf chc;'";",i-::;ai ar.d physica; pCiiCiIT.etei s :;iTlited ;r. th;s peiTnit si·I.:,:1 t.c c(,(jj·di( • .:,teu 

so that the resulting analysis is also representative of the samples used for toxicity testing. 

Discharges which use chlorination as part of the waste treatment process for disinfection should be 

dechlorinated prior to toxicity testing or samples shall be taken immediately prior to the chlorination system. 

In accordance with NYSDEC guidance, the Department may require the permittee to conduct additional 

toxicity testing. If such additional testing is necessary, the permittee shall be notified in writing by the NYS 

DEC Regional Water Engineer. The written notification shall include the reason{s) why such testing is 

required. 
on this evaluation, the Department may require the permittee to perform a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation 

(TRE). Should a TRE be required, the permittee shall be notified in writing by the NYS DEC Regional Water 

Engineer. The written notification shall include the reasons why the TRE is required. 

2 Within 60 days of the date of the written notification from the NYS DEC Regional Water Engineer in (a), the 

permittee shall submit an approvable proposal for Toxicity Reduction Evaluation to the Bureau of Watershed 

Assessment and Research, 625 Broadway , Albany , NY 12233-3502. The TRE proposal shall be directed 

towards identifying the source of the toxicity, describing procedures to reduce the toxicity to an acceptable 

level, identifying monitoring parameters suitable for insuring control of the toxicity, and proposing a schedule 

for completing the TRE. 

(c) Within 14 days of receipt of written approval of the TRE proposal from the DEC Regional Water Engineer, the 

permittee shall implement the approved TRE proposal in accordance with the approved schedule. 

(d) The completed TRE, including data findings and recommendations for corrective action, permit limits, and 

proposed self-monitoring requirements shall be submitted to the Bureau of Watershed Assessment and 

Research at the address noted in (b) on this page. The Department will review the TRE and may modify the 

permit. in accordance with applicable law & regulation, to incorporate one or more of the following: substance 

specifiC numerical limits, toxicity limits, monitoring requirements, andlor a schedule of compliance that will 

ensure acceptable toxicity levels of the effluent. 
Outfall Number & 

Effluent Parameter 

Discharge Limitations 

Daily Avg. Daily Max. Units 

062: Storm water drainage from vehicle maintenance and storage area 

Flow1 Monitor Monitor 

pH (Range) 6.0 - 90 (Range) 

Oil and Grease8 15 

Measurement Sample 

Frequencj' 6,7 Type3,4 

Gallons 

SU 

mg/l 

2x1year 2xlyear 2x1year 

Estimate 

Grab Grab 

119: Storm water drainage from and adjacent to Weiland Road Inorganic Landfill and storm water retention pond 

overilow 

Flow1 Monitor Monitor Gallons 2xJyear Estimate 

pH (Range) 6.0 • 9.0 (Range) SU 2xlyear Grab 

Oil and Greases 15 mg/l 2xlyear Grab 

TOe Monitor mg/l 2xlyear Composite 

Conductivity Monitor IJmhos 2xlyear Composite 

Footnotes on Page 24. 
the discharges from the permitted facility shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below: 

Outfall Number & 

Effluent Parameter 

Discharge Limitations 

Daily Avg. Daily Max. Units 

101, 106: Storm water drainage from non-chemical handling areas 

No monitoring required 

114: Storm water drainage from fuel unloading area 

Flow1 Monitor Monitor 

pH (Range) 6.0 · 9.0 (Range) 

Oil and Greases 15 

115: Storm water drainage from chemical handling areas 

Flow1 Monitor Monitor 

pH (Range) 6.0·9.0 (Range) 

Oil and Greases 15 

Footnotes on Page 24. 

Minimum 

Monitoring Requirements 

Measurement Sample 

Frequency2-6.7 TypeJ .4 

Gallons 

SU 

mg/l 

Gallons 

SU 

mg/l 

2x1year 2xJyear 

2xJyear 2xlyear 2xlyear 

2xlyear 

Estimate 

Grab Grab 

Estimate 

Grab Grab 
(1) for four of six consecutive samples, or 

(2) for mo of six consecutive samples by 20% or more, or 

(3) for any 1 sample by 50% or more, 

the Department may require additional sampling and monitoring for the parameter exceeding the action level. If levels 

higher than the action levels are confirmed by additional sampling, the permit may be reopened by the Department for 

consideration of revised action levels, effluent limits or other permit conditions. 

The permittee is not authorized to discharge any of listed parameters at levels which may cause or contribute 

to a violation of water quality standards. 

Outfall Number & Minimum Monitoring Requirements 

Effluent Parameter Action Level Units Measurement Frequency2.t.7 Sample Type"" 

062: Storm water drainage from vehicle maintenance and storage area 

Ammonia, as NH3 1_5 mgll 

TOe 50 mgJl 

2xJyear 2xJyear 

Composite Composite 

119: Storm water drainage from and adjacent to Weiland Road Inorganic Landfill and storm water retention pond 

overflow 

Ammonia, as NH3 1.5 mg/l 2xJyear Composite 

TOe 50 mgll 2xJyear Composite 

114: Storm water grain age from fuel unloading area 

TOe 50 mgll 2x1year Grab 

115: Storm water drainage from chemical handling areas 

TOe 50 mgll 2x1year Composite 

Chromium, Total 0.4 mg/l 2xJyear Composite Copper, Total 1.0 mg/l 2xJyear Composite Cyanide, Freei 0.1 mg/l 2xJyear Composite 

Lead, Total 0.5 mgll 2xJyear Composite Mercury. Total 0005 mgll 2x1year Composite 

Silver. Total 3.0 mgJl 2xJyear Composite 

Vanadium, Total 0.1 mgll 2xJyear Composite 

Zinc, Total 4.0 mgll 2x1year Composite 

Footnotes on Page 24. 
a. Date of storm event; 

b. Duration of storm (in minutes); 

c. Total rainfall during the storm event (in inches); 

d. Time betvveen the beginning of the storm event and the end of the previous measured storm event of 

greater than 0.1 inches. in hours; 

e. Maximum flow rate at the Outfall during the rain event (in gallons per minute): 

1. Total flow from the rain event (in gallons): and 

g. A description of the method of flow measurement or estimate. 

The permittee shall include the total flow from the rain event (item f. above) on the DMR for purposes of 

compliance with the monitoring conditions listed on pages 21 and 22. The permittee shall submit, to the 

Region a Kodak Park Project Manager, summary table{s} including the above information for each storm 

event sampled during the previous year within 90 days following the end of each calendar year. The table(s) 

shall be submitted on a personal computer diskette in spreadsheet format. 

2. The two sampled storm events for a given location shall be separated by a minimum of 30 days. 

3. Grab samples: An automatic refrigerated sampler may be used to collect the compliance grab sample within 

the first 30 minutes of flow from the Outfall for Oil & Grease and pH samples. An on-line pH monitor at the 

Outfall may be used to record the pH of the discharge. If an on-line pH monitor is used, the minimum and 

maximum values observed within the first 30 minutes will be reported. These values shall be used for 

compliance monitoring. pH samples taken by the automatic sampler must be analyzed within the first 30 

minutes of collection, or as soon as practical thereafter. 

4. Composite samples: A flow-weighted composite for the entire storm event or, at a minimum, the first three 

hours shall be collected and analyzed for those parameters requiring composite samples. 

5. No longer applicable {TOO method superseded by TOC monitoring}. 

6. The measurement frequency of 2x/year is defined to be 2x/calendar year. 

7. If ED PM is after June 1, 1996, only one sampling event is required for the above Outfalls in 1996. If EDPM is 

after August 1, 1996, sampling and monitoring requirements for the above Outfalls shalt begin in 1997. 

8. The permittee shall endeavor to achieve the Method Detection Level (MOL), and Method Level (ML) or 

Practical Quantification Level (POL), published by the DEC andlor EPA using approved test methods as 

speCified in 40 CFR Part 136 for this parameter. The permittee may develop matrix specific MDLs and 

Mls/PQLs using test methods set forth in 40 CFR Part 136 Appendix B where it is unable to achieve the 

published MDL and MUPOL. A permit limit shall not be set higher than a MUPOL for a site-specific matrix. 

The permit limit will be the highest of the EPA published MUPQL, matrix specific MUPQL, or the limit 

specified in this permit. 

9. The Weak. Acid Dissociable Analytical method shall be used to monitor compliance with this limit. 
process and material handling areas; loading and unloading operations; storm water, erosion, and sediment control 

measures, and sludge and waste disposal areas) where toxic pollutants or hazardous substances are used, 

manufactured, stored or handled to evaluate the potential for the release of significant amounts of such pollutants to 

the waters of the State. In performing such an evaluation, the permittee shall consider such factors as the probability 

of equipment failure or improper operation, settlement of facility air emissions, the effects of natural phenomena such 

as freezing temperatures and precipitation, fires, and the facility's history of spills and leaks. For hazardous pollutants, 

the list of reportable quantities as defined in 40 CFR, Part 117 may be used as a guide in determining significant 

amounts of releases. For toxic pollutants, the relative toxicity of the pollutant shall be considered in determining the 

significance of potential releases. The review shall address all substances present at the facility that are listed as toxic 

pollutants under Section 307(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act or as hazardous substances under Section 311 of the Act 

or that are identified as Chemicals of Concern by the Industrial Chemical Survey. 

3. 'Mlenever the potential for a significant release of toxic or hazardous pollutants to State waters is determined to be 

present, the permittee shall identify Best Management Practices that have been established to minimize such potential 

releases . VVhere BMPs are inadequate or absent, appropriate 8MPs shall be established. In selecting appropriate 

BMPs, the permittee shall consider typical industry practices such as spill reporting procedures, risk identification and 

assessment, employee training, inspections and records, preventive maintenance, good housekeeping, materials 

compatibility and security. In addition, the permittee may consider structural measures (such as secondary 

containment and erosion/sediment control devices) where appropriate. 

4 Development of the BMP plan shall include sampling of waste stream segments for the purpose of toxic "hot spor'-

identification. The economic achievability of technology-based end-of-pipe treatment will not be considered until plant 

site "hot spot" sources have been identified, contained, removed or minimized through the imposition of site specific 

BMPs or application of internal facility treatment technology. 

5. The BMP plan shall be documented in narrative form and shall include any necessary plot plans, drawings or maps. 

Other documents already prepared for the facility such as a Safety Manual or a Spill Prevention, Control and 

Countermeasure (SpeC) plan may be used as part of the plan and may be incorporated by reference. Storm water 

elements of the BMP plan shall be developed in accordance with the September 1992 USEPA manual "Storm Water 

Management for Industrial Activities," USEPA Office of Water Publication EPA 832-R-92-006.A copy of the BMP plan 

shall be maintained at the facility and shall be available to authorized Department representatives upon request. As 

a minimum, the plan shall include the following BMP's: a. BMP Committee; b. Reporting of 8MP Incidents; c. Risk 

Identification and Assessment; d. Employee Training; e. Inspections and Records; f. Preventive Maintenance; g. 

Good Housekeeping; h. Materials Compatibility; i. Security; j. Spill prevention and response; k. Erosion and sediment 

control; I. Management of runoff. 

7. The BMP plan shall be modified whenever changes at the facility materially increase the potential for significant 

releases of toxic or hazardous substances or where actual releases indicate the plan is inadequate . 

• A -hot spot- is a segment of an industrial facility ; including but not limited to soil, equipment. material storage areas, sewer lines etc; which 

contributes elevated levels of problem pollutants to the wastewater andlor storm water collection system of that facility. For the purposes 

ofthis definition, problem pollutants are substances for which end of pipe treatment to meet a water quality or technology requirement may, 

considering the results of waste stream segment sampling, be deemed unreasonable. For the purposes of this definition, an elevated level 

is a concentration or mass loading of the pollutant in question which is adequately higher than the end of pipe concentration of that same 

pollutant so as to allow for and economically justify removal andlor isolation of the segment andlor BAT. treatment of wastewaters 

emanating from the segment. 
Upon approval of the proposed strategy by the Region 8 Kodak Team Manager, the permittee shall implement that 

strategy. 

2. Consistent with the requirements of 6 NYCRR Part 373 regarding corrective action, the permittee shall propose a 

priority ranking system for investigation of and, as required, corrective action for sewers and sewer appurtenances 

Ihat are tributary to the King's landing Wastewater Purification Plant (this requirement does not cover sewers tributary 

to Outfall 003 during normal operations). 

After approval of the above noted ranking system program by the DEC Region 8 Kodak Team Manager, the permittee 

shall submit a listing by priority of sewer sections or areas to be investigated, including mapping of those sewer 

sections, areas and appurtenances. The listing shall include a schedule for investigation. 

3. Based upon investigation results, the permittee shall propose either a schedule for corrective action and case specific 

technologies that will be applied in sewer corrective action or a strategy alternative to case specific technologies. 

Upon approval by the DEC Region 8 Kodak Team Manager of the jisting of sewers and sewer appurtenances and 

schedule noted in (2) and (3) above and endorsement by the DEC Region 8 Regional Water Engineer oflhe proposed 

technologies or strategy alternative, the permittee shail implement those schedules. The approval of the DEC Region 

8 Kodak Team Manager satisfies all applicable notice and approval requirements contained in the 6NYCRR Part 750. 

4. Upon approval by the DEC Region 8 Kodak Team Manager of the listing of sewers and sewer appurtenances and 

schedule noted in (2) above and endorsement by the DEC Region 8 Regional Water Engineer of the proposed 

technologies or strategy alternative, the permittee shall implement that schedule. 

Any of the above sections of the sewer BMP may be modified with written agreement of the Region 8 Kodak Team 

Manager. 

5. Outfall 003, Solids Removal Unit (SRU): Within one year of EDPM, Kodak shall submit the following information 

(Completed 11/20/2003): 

A. A summary of the at-source reduction activities and standard operating procedures in place to reduce the 

quantity of film chips and other solids reaching the SRU. 

B. Performance information that is available from the vendor for this unit. 

C. A description of the operation and maintenance procedures for the SRU, including a summary of the 

wi,a ... .::c':: c .. :r,c; S:;':: a;-,j :r,':' q ..... :,t:t1 ,s.;-,d cuiTtp.c.;itic" cf tr,o; n-.ate,;a:5 ,o;;T,u'v-=d fi-uff, th.; 

during maintenence procedures. 

D. A report on observations made during inspections of Outfall 003. 

The Department will review this information in its determination of Kodak's request under 6NYCRR Part 7S4.2(b) to 

have the SRU and associated at-source reduction activities be considered Best Conventional Pollutant Control 

Technology (BeT). 

6. The permittee shall remove any significant quantities of accumulated film chip solids noted during routine inspections 

of the area surrounding and downgradient of Outfall 003. 
the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the $POES permit application record for this permit term or ten 

times the practical quantitation limit for substances not detected in the SPDES permit application record for thiS permit term. 

Additional substances included in this Section: Part 7S0-1.2(a)(27)(v) is defined as discharges of substances not subject 

to the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act, Title III , Section 302 list of Extremely Hazardous Substances and 

not required to be reported on the permittee's New York State SPDES permit application (including the Industrial Chemical 

Survey and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act, Title III, Section 313, Toxic Release Inventory), provided 

the special conditions section of this permit does not otherwise forbid such a discharge. The department may, in 

accordance with law and regulation, mOdify this permit to include limits for any substance even if that substance is not 

required to be reported on the SPDES permit application. 

Part 750-2.6 (a) and (b); Part 750-1 .2(aH35) 

The term "facility expansion" is defined as: 

(1) when production in anyone functional operation described in the SPDES permit application record for this permit 

term increases by greater than 20 percent and that increase in production will result in discharges not authorized by 

this permit, 

(2) when the permittee commences use of a substance, discharge of which is not authorized by this permit, that will 

contact wastewater and that is covered in the New York State Industrial Chemical Survey (in any amount for 

substances limited by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in fish and registered pesticides, in amounts exceeding 

1000 pounds per year for substances in the New York State Industrial Chemical Survey under codes 1 through 98 and 

in amounts exceeding 10,000 pounds per calendar year for substances in the New York State Industrial Survey under 

code 99) ortha! is covered in permittee's Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act, Title III, Section 302 report 

or Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act, Title III Section 313 Toxic Release Inventory or 

( ) when the permittee increases usage of a substance beyond the annual usage range given in the permittee's most 

recent New York State Industrial Chemical Survey submission. Reporting of new substance usage (e.g. an increase 

in the quantity used results in a change in that substance's ICS usage range) in accordance with this paragraph must 

be submitted annually by August 1"1 for the previous year. 

Parts750-2.10(a-il: Part 750-2.8 

The information submitted as part of the Site Specific Best Management Practices for Sewers fulfills the requirements of the 

above Parts with respect to modifications to the sewers in Kodak Park. 
a. Precipitation during the storm event must be greater than 0.1 inches; 

b. The storm event must take place at least 72 hours after the previously measurable storm event (greater than 0.1 

mches); and 

c. VVhere feasible, the variance in the duration of the storm event and the total rainfall of the storm event should not 

exceed 50% from the average or median rainfall event for the area. 

Samples taken during storm events which do not meet the above criteria are acceptable, but must be accompanied by an 

explanation of why the storm event criteria were not met. 

B. Prohibition on non-storm water discharges 

Discharges of material other than storm water must be in compliance with the provisions contained in the non-storm water 

portions of this permit. However, the following non-storm water discharges may be authorjzed by this permit provided the nonstorm water component of the discharge is in compliance with the practices and provisions developed in the BMP Plan as referenced on page 26 of this permit: discharges from fire fighting activities; fire hydrant flushings; potable water sources 

including water line flushings; miscellaneous Kodak water; irrigation drainage: lawn watering: routine external building 

washdown which does not use detergents or other compounds; pavement washwaters where spills or leaks of toxic or 

hazardous materials have not occurred (unless all spilled material has been removed) and where detergents are not used; air 

conditioning condensate; steam condensate; springs; uncontaminated ground water; and foundation or footing drains where 

flows are not contaminated with process materials such as solvents. 

C. Annual notification of changes to storm water Outfall{s) 

The permittee shall submit an annual report to this Department summarizing the substantive material changes to the storm 

water Outfalls and/or storm water drainage basins covered by this permit. Substantive material changes include the following 

actions: addition of a storm water Outfall and/or drainage basin; deletion of a storm water Outfall and/or drainage basin; 

change in category of a storm water Outfall (e.g., a chemical handling area Outfall changes to a non-chemical handling area 

Outfall due to removal of equipment); relocation of an existing storm water Outfall: or routing of all or a portion of a drainage 

basin to the industrial sewer. Extensive construction or other activity within an existing drainage basin should be reported if 

the activity will cause a change in the category of the basin, result in known or potential water quality impacts during a sampled 

storm event, and/or will result in a discharge, on a non-routine or infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant which is not limited in 

the permit at levels exceeding the "notification levels" listed in 6NYCRR Part 750-2.6. Minor material changes, such as routine 

paving and repaving, landscaping and landscape maintenance, demolition of a building that has been cleaned of process 

chemicals, or relocation of waste management equipment within a storm water drainage baSin, need not be included in the 

annual summary. Should material changes in the drainage basin of an indicator Outfall cause it to change category, the 

permittee shall designate a equivalent replacement Outfall for monitoring purposes The annual report 5110311 cover a calendar 

year (Jan. 1 - Uec. ;:\1) anCl De suomlneCl no later than 90 days follOWing the end of each calendar year. The annual reports 

shall be appended to the permit file, and serve in lieu of a permit modification during the effective period of this permit. This 

condition substantially supersedes 6NYCRR Part 750-2.10(a-i) as it affects storm water discharges from the facility . 
the summation of all the measured daily discharges in appropriate units as specified herein divided by the number of days 

during the calendar month when measurements were made. 

The daily maximum discharge means the total discharge by weight or in other appropriate units as specified 

herein, during any calendar day. 

MONITORING LOCATIONS 

The permittee shall take samples and measurements, to comply with the monitoring requirements specified in 

this permit, at the location(s) indicated below: 

• 

003 

-

.: ..... 

___ .i= 

, .... 

WEIu.ND • • • _ 

... 

Outfall 

001 003 

004 

006 

Samolir.g Location Secondary Treatment Plant Effluent 

Shed M-57 

Ef f luent f rom Pond near Bu ildings 301-304 

Ove rflow access manhole south of Corona Road 
during the calendar month when measurements were made. 

The daily maximum discharge means the total discharge by weight or in other appropriate units as specified 

herein, during any calendar day. 

MONITORING LOCATIONS 

The permittee shall take samples and measurements, to comply with the monitoring requirements specified in 

this permit, at the location{s) indicated below: 

t o 

o 

] CJ 

DeC] 

u , 

=:J !::j==l '" 0 o Ll 

CJ ! _I_J-

, I 

035 

\ -

Outfall Sample Location 

025 Approx. 20 ft. West of the Northwest corner of Building 211 

035 Approx. 100 ft. East of the Northeast corner of Building 320 

o 

0

o 

0 
operating. 'M1ere less than daily sampling is required by this permit, the daily average discharge shall be determined by 

the summation of all the measured daily discharges in appropriate units as specified herein divided by the number of days 

during the calendar month when measurements were made. 

The daily maximum discharge means the total discharge by weight or in other appropriate units as specified 

herein, during any calendar day. 

MONITORING LOCATIONS 

The permittee shall take samples and measurements, to comply with the monitoring requirements specified in 

this permit. at the location(s) indicated below: 

Outfall 

109 

--

-

109+ 

Sampl ing Loc ation 

Approx . 210 ft . We st of Sou thwe st corner of Building 601 
KODAK PARK SITE 

STORM WA TER DISCHARGE OUTFALLS 

." 

., '" 

. l 

KPM KPX KPW KPE 

I 

N 

Stormwater Outfall Samplmg locabOtls and Outfall Groupln9s 

Outfall 

062 

10" \1 

.1ML 

l' 

J ' 

,,, . l' I 

107, 108_ I .' _ l __ 

KPsrr 

Sampling Location 

I 

Non-chemicalhandhn9 areas 

Chemical Handling Areas 

Weiland Rd InorganiC landfill 

Indlcalor Outfa!JJ 

101, 106 

115 

119 

Fuel Unloading Area. NIS of 6-53 114 

Vehicle Mamtenance & Storage 62 

Approx. 130 feet west of northwest corner of Building 340. 

119 Approx. 200 feet west of the discharge point from the storm waler retention pond. 

Ourtalls Included 

2,5, 17, 19, 21. 22, 23, 24. 26. 27 28. 

29. 30, 31 , 33,38. 39,44, 56,57,59, 

66. 77, 78,79,89,90,91,92,94. 

96, 99, 100, 102,103,104. 106,107, 

106 110. 111, 112. 113, 117, 120, 121 

12, 13, 95, 98 

118 

J 

114 Approx. 75 feet northwest of northwest corner of Building 53 at fuel unloading area; sample at diSCharge end of 

trap tank. 

115 Approx. 50 feet northeast of northerly northeast corner of Building 135. 
{Xl (if box is checked) monitoring information required by this permit shall be summarized and reported by 

submitting completed and signed Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms for each _,_ month reporting 

period to the locations specified below. Blank forms are available at the Department's Albany office listed 

below. The first reporting period begins on the effective date of this permit and the reports will be due no later 

than the 15th day of the second month following the end of each reporting period. 

Send the original (top sheet) of each DMR page to: 

Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water 

Bureau of Water Compliance Programs 

625 Broadway 

Albany, New Yorl< 12233-3506 

Phone: (518) 402-8177 

Send the first ggQy (second sheet) of each DMR page to: 

Department of Environmental Conservation 

Regional Water Engineer 

Region 8 

6274 E. Avon-Lima Road 

Avon, NY 14414-9519 

Monroe County Dept. of Health 

PO Box 92832 

Rochester, NY 14962-8932 

c) A monthly "Wastewater Facility Operation Report ... " (form 92-15-7) shall be submitted (if box is checked) to the [ 

Regional Water Engineer andlor { 1 County Health Department or Environmental Control Agency listed above. 

d) Noncompliance with the provisions of this permit shall be reported to the Department as prescribed in 

6 NYCRR Part 750-1.2{a) and 750-2. 

e) Monitoring must be conducted according to test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136, unless other test 

procedures have been specified in this permit. 

1) If the permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by the permit, using test procedures approved 

under 40 CFR Part 136 or as specified in this permit, the results of this monitoring shall be included in the calculations 

and recording of the data on the Discharge Monitoring Reports. 

g) Calculation for all limitations which require averaging of measurements shall utilize an arithmetic mean unless 

otherwise specified in this permit 

h) Unless otherwise specified, all information recorded on the Discharge Monitoring Report shall be based upon 

measurements and sampling carried out during the most recently completed reporting period. 

i) Any laboratory test or sample analysis required by this permit for which the State Commissioner of Health issues 

certificates of approval pursuant to section five hundred two of the Public Health Law shall be conducted by a 

laboratory which has been issued a certificate of approval. Inquiries regarding laboratory certification should be sent 

to the Environmental laboratory Accreditation Program, New York State Health Department Center for Laboratories 

and Research, Division of Environmental Sciences , The Nelson A. Rockefeller Empire State Plaza, Albany , New York 

12201 .