alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Netopia, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), William B. Baker, as Senior Vice President, Finance and Operations, and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | iii. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | ---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | iv. |  | The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ William D. BakerWilliam D. Baker Senior Vice President, Finance and Operations, and Chief Financial Officer Date: August 1, 2003
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Vincent Vellardita, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of ValCom, Inc. for
the
quarter ended June 30, 2006;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue  statement of
a  material  fact  or  omit  to  state  a  material  fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial statements, and  other  financial
information included in this report,  fairly  present  in all material respects
the  financial condition, results of operations and cash  flows  of  the  small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The   small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined  in  Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to  ensure  that
material  information  relating  to  the  small  business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the small business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and procedures and presented  in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls  and  procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that occurred during  the  small  business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the  small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that  has  materially  affected, or is
reasonably  likely  to materially affect, the small business issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.  The  small  business  issuer's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  have
disclosed, based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control over
financial  reporting,  to  the  small business issuer's auditors and the  audit
committee  of  the  small business issuer's  board  of  directors  (or  persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the  design or
operation  of  internal  control  over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely  to adversely affect the small  business  issuer's  ability  to  record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.

October 4, 2006


/s/ Vincent Vellardita
---------------------------
Vincent Vellardita
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, John Duffy,President of ClearComm, L.P., certify that:

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report of ClearComm, L.P.;

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 14, 2006 |   |           |
|-------------------------|--------|----------------|
|                    |   |           |
|                    |   | /s/ John Duffy |
|                    |   | John Duffy     |
|                    |   | President      |

 

----
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 11-7043 September Term, 2011

 FILED ON: JULY 25, 2012

1:10-cv-00519

Elli Bern Angellino,

Appellant

v.

Royal Family Al-Saud et al.,

Appellees

BEFORE: HENDERSON, ROGERS and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

It is ORDERED by the court that the opinion filed by the court on June 5, 2012 be

amended as follows: 

On page 7, line 25, replace

“with the Royal Family”

with

“on the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia or a political subdivision thereof”

On pages 7-8, footnote 6, line 7 (on page 8), insert “against the individual defendants”

between “action” and “ ‘should.’ ”

On page 9, line 13, replace

“defendant Royal Family”

with

“Kingdom of Saudi Arabia”

On page 9, lines 16-18, replace
“suit against Royal Family as suit against Kingdom of Saudi Arabia or one of its

political subdivisions”

with

“pro se complaint to seek relief from both Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, or political

subdivision thereof, and individual defendants”

On page 9, line 18, add the following footnote 7 after “supra note 6."

To be clear, we express no opinion whether the Royal Family is equivalent to 7

the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia or a political subdivision thereof. We understand

Angellino’s complaint to seek relief from, inter alia, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia or

a political subdivision thereof, service of which is governed by section 1608(a). See

Appellant’s Br. at 18-20 (action “[was] [b]rought [a]gainst the Defendants as [a]

Foreign State”); Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (pro se filing “is to be

liberally construed” (quotation marks omitted)).

On page 9, lines 20-21, delete “on the defendant Royal Family”

On page 10, line 11, replace

“Royal Family members”

with

“Kingdom of Saudi Arabia”

On page 13, lines 23-24, replace

“defendant Royal Family”

with

“Kingdom of Saudi Arabia”

PER CURIAM

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Jennifer M. Clark 

Deputy Clerk
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T h e p a rtie s c o n s e n te dto p r o c e e db e f o r e am a g is tr a te ju d g e . See 28 ** U . S . C . § 6 36 (c ).

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** * w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T D A V I D W . FERN A N D ES, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. C OMMI S S I ON E R OF S OC I AL S E C UR I T Y, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 10- 15344 D. C. No . 1 : 0 8 - c v - 0 1 7 7 5 - DLB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia D e nni s L . B e c k, M a gi s tr a t e Judge , P r e s i di ng **

S ubm i tt e d June 15, 2011 ** * B efo re: C A N B Y , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D a vi d W . F e rna nde s appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nt



# FI LED JU L 7 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 15344 2 di s m i s s i ng f

orl a c k of

s ubj e c tm a tt e rj ur i s di c t i on hi s a c t i on a ga i ns tthe C o m m is s io n e ro f

S o c ia l S e c u r ity . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . Su bi a v. C om m ’rof So c. Sec. , 26 4 F . 3d 89 9, 90 1 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 1 ) . W e a f

f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed F ernand es ’ s a ct i on for l ac k o f s ubj ec t m att erj uri sdi ct i on because F ernand es , throu gh coun se l , w i thd re w hi s r equestfor a h e a r in g b e f

o r e a n a d m in is tr a tiv e law ju d g e a n dth u s f a ile dto e x h au s t h is a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s , a n dh e f a ile dto a lle g e ac o lo r ab le c o n s titu tio n a l c la im . Se e id. a t 9 0 2 - 0 3 . F ernand es ’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.
#### BRUCE v. STATE.

No. 17866.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 22, 1936.

F. M. Robertson and John Banks, both of Haskell, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for thé State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of unlawfully selling spirituous liquor capable of producing intoxication, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of one year.

This prosecution was had under what is commonly known as the “Dean Law” (Pen. Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended), which has since been repealed (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 49). Therefore it becomes our duty, under the decision of this court in the-case of Meadows v. State, 88 S.W.(2d) 481, recently decided, to reverse and dismiss this prosecution, and it is so ordered.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Exhibit 23.1


                       Consent of Independent Auditors

We  consent  to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form  S-8  Nos. 33-20437, 33-61322, 333-60381, 333-30878 and 333-60316,  and
Form S-3 Nos. 333-38246 and 333-38218) of Spartech Corporation, of our report
dated   December  12,  2002,  with  respect  to  the  consolidated  financial
statements and schedule incorporated by reference or included in this Form 10-
K for the year ended November 2, 2002.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
January 17, 2003
                                                                 Exhibit 23.2



INFORMATION REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

We  have  not  been  able to obtain, after reasonable  efforts,  the  written
consent  from our former independent public accountant, Arthur Andersen  LLP,
to  our  incorporation  by  reference on Form  10-K  pertaining  to  Spartech
Corporation,  of  their report dated December 6, 2001  with  respect  to  the
financial  statements  and the supplemental schedule of Spartech  Corporation
included  in  this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November  3,
2001,  as  required by section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933,  as  amended.
Accordingly,  you  will be unable to recover amounts  sought  in  any  action
against  Arthur  Andersen  LLP,  the former  independent  public  accountant,
pursuant  to  the  Securities  of 1933 and the  regulations  thereunder,  and
therefore  any right of recovery may be limited as a result of  the  lack  of
that consent.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2935 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2935

To provide for a five-year extension of the authority of the Secretary 
 of Veterans Affairs to provide for the conduct of medical disability 
                  examinations by contract physicians.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2015

  Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a five-year extension of the authority of the Secretary 
 of Veterans Affairs to provide for the conduct of medical disability 
                  examinations by contract physicians.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disabled Veterans Red Tape Reduction 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS TO PROVIDE FOR THE CONDUCT OF MEDICAL DISABILITY 
              EXAMINATIONS BY CONTRACT PHYSICIANS.

    Section 704(c) of the Veterans Benefits Act of 2003 (Public Law 
108-183; 38 U.S.C. 5101 note) is amended by striking ``December 31, 
2015'' and inserting ``December 31, 2018''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2707 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2707

   To ensure a legislative solution for those individuals who may be 
    affected by ObamaCare's unlawful implementation, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2015

  Mr. Walker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To ensure a legislative solution for those individuals who may be 
    affected by ObamaCare's unlawful implementation, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prevention of Bureaucratic 
Workarounds Act''.

SEC. 2. PREVENTING BUREAUCRATIC WORKAROUNDS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 
not enter into contract with a State, or otherwise award any assistance 
to a State, to make available to the State any technology that is used 
as part of the Federal health insurance exchange established under 
section 1321 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 
U.S.C. 18041).
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in subsection (a) shall be 
construed to prohibit a State from establishing a State-based Exchange 
under section 1321 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
(42 U.S.C. 18041).
    (c) Applicability.--This Act applies only with respect to contracts 
entered into, and assistance awarded, after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of Norwood Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Lewis J. Critelli, President and Chief Executive Officer, and William S. Lance, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/ Lewis J. Critelli

/s/ William S. LanceLewis J. Critelli

William S. LancePresident and Chief Executive Officer

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer








August 6, 2010
|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |  |
| INDIANA                                        | 35-1544218 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

----

|             |                        |
|-------------|------------------------|
| Exhibit No. | Description of Exhibit |

|      |                                          |
|------|------------------------------------------|
| 99.1 | Joint Press Release, dated June 15, 2015 |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12551]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in the exhibition “The Arts of Korea” at The Art Institute of Chicago, in Chicago, Illinois; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2024-21832 Filed 9-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Exhibit 3(d)   

 

 

 

BY-LAWS

 

OF

 

THE PEOPLES GAS LIGHT AND COKE COMPANY

 

 

 

 

AMENDED AUGUST 15, 2003   

 

THE PEOPLES GAS LIGHT AND COKE COMPANY

 

BY-LAWS

 

ARTICLE I
-
Offices
 
 
 
ARTICLE II
-
Meetings of Shareholders
 
 
 
ARTICLE III
-
Directors and Committees
 
 
 
ARTICLE IV
-
Officers
 
 
 
ARTICLE V
-
Indemnification of Directors,
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------

               Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. & Subsidiaries
                    Certification Of Chief Executive Officer
           Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Commodore Applied Technologies,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on form 10-Q/A as of and for the three and  six-month  periods
ended June 30,  2005,  Shelby  Brewer  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

         (1)  The annual report fully complies with the  requirements of section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents,
              in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

Date:    November  22, 2005

/s/ Shelby T. Brewer
--------------------
Shelby T. Brewer
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer