alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Pursuant to Item 601(c)(2)(i) of Regulations S-K, the Registrnat hereby
disclaims Exhibit 27. This schedule contains summary financial information
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Exhibit 13.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           27985
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    21617
<ALLOWANCES>                                       604
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 62624
<PP&E>                                           62313
<DEPRECIATION>                                   39450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  103675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            49357
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                          1016
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       52134
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    103675
<SALES>                                         175560
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                175560
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   165644
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 770
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9380
<INCOME-TAX>                                      4130
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               5250
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5250
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

             


<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements contained in the Form 10-Q for the nine months ended
September 30, 1998 for Aetna Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            33,194
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                         638
<MORTGAGE>                                       3,653
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      276
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  40,362
<CASH>                                           3,482
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           2,533
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,895
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 18,430
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                234
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   4,065
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           17,934
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  2,210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              862
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,423
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,895
<PREMIUMS>                                      10,548
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              2,424
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 226
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   1,703
<BENEFITS>                                      10,489
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        176
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,062
<INCOME-TAX>                                       417
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                646
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       646
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.17<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.10<F2>
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>The EPS-Primary tag represents basic EPS under SFAS 128.
<F2>The EPS-Diluted tag represents diluted EPS under SFAS 128.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 1 9 , 2019

NO. 03

- 19

- 00062

- CV

Mijiza Parker, Appellant

v.

Breckenridge Property Fund 2016, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JU S TICES GOODWIN, BAKER , AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on January 10, 2019 . Having

reviewed the record , the Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted her appeal and did not

comply with a notice from the C lerk of this C ourt

. Therefore, the Court dismi sses the appeal for

want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of

costs is made.
_______________________________________ __ ___________________ ________________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

June 3, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 136574 (12) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. COREY A. ASKEW, Stephen J. Markman, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 136574 CoA: 282916 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Defendant-Appellee.

On order of the Court, the motion to wa ive fees is considered and it is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 re quires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Appellant is not required to pay an initial partial fee. Ho wever, for an appeal to be filed, appellant must resubm it a copy of this order, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned with this order within 21 days. By doing this, appellant becomes responsible for paying th e $375.00 filing fee. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this Court. If appellant timely refiles the pleadings, m onthly payments sha ll be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to appellant’s account until the payments equal the total amount of the filing fee stated above. That amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) pl aintiff shall not file furt her appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this cas e is paid in full. The Clerk of the Court sha ll furnish two copies of th is order to appellant and return appellant’s pleadings with this order.

jm I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 3, 2008
Clerk
f~( 11", " 

)o/D 

D-f' 6' ( j'Vl-' b..Q 11"1' VI I I, 

h l \ 1L. t" t ail w.e {(/I v{' ~tl t- "" tA 


o.Q.rv c-tA c:.o (,q V\ 0 t'" I,' tAR I (0 v cQ ,5 Ol~ ~ L,1,> ,z I.N? LJ 


I 0'1-1 ~ 'k,~ (9~ +l..e ,oc~ JJ...o 7 : s (ok~ 177)'1' I ~ " ) " 


, , 1 

"~P ~1icJt· l[ /O"IA voie Ct (50, v ~;-;kP t (a c, vi-4 . 


OC<2rO~ (1',y- ~~ (5)t(f~1 I . 


\ . ~"k IQ( k ~ J2 {J--t::-Q u wh'(/Vl ($6 (p (3'Ct.1,1 

~-~ .Q..lt·~ rJ\ i~" ~-.' (~~.~ +" '~vA'~ ('1', LVf /ft..;. (p,\ Ci-Q,": &0 tvi -tD 

~o Il+e (,u2"" ~) M (; ~ - (Nj(,~ ~ lj·"\ ; C .+U yo (j '-I .fG.-p I \ V 

V ; \ o+J W \r 1 t+ tf, nf) ~ 1-"y-a (I/) l#\ J2 u 0 LA ') ~ ( Co 00 "t v lAL'S: ~) ; 

o...-! c; fA t> w' -li-e M +t, po J N l'r H rod" (1~:; 'r, v'\ L/~ rIS 5: \~V PVO,?)OU1.) 

c.. .8' f~..e (} ,. ~ {u~ d.{) (~() 1(}o cP j I (" 

S v c,·.(- 11.) h~""p ..(! u,~lu cvf-;. l'n G.-v / U kL '¥ Co (ir~7 (;', -t Ck'''; , I ..........____ _ 


.. .Q&;..,.,'~.. I--:~ !<:\:::r tvt-t··JI I_A .:Ll... /' .. f."L· \/1 ' J .' T,. v. C \\- 'TO 0... l rr c IU'<]- Y" V I L-f d U q p 


dP 'f • "'"") -b N q ,. W! '" v-..u.J +wv -'/.1'"",- t>&:(t IN, d, 


~("~ I 

(h v~ ( 1\1\ 0 fA v -e..p '" /1.A 0 ( I 

Pi dt~b~ I J1.- 1lI7
# C_2022335EN.01000801.xml

| 2.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/8

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1)
  )

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 335/07)

Decision granting a partial authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2022) 6036 | 26 August 2022 | Sodium chromate
  EC No. 231-889-5, CAS No. 7775-11-3 | Ariston Thermo SpA., Viale Aristide Merloni 45, 60044 Fabriano, Italy | REACH/22/26/0 | As an anticorrosion agent of the carbon steel in sealed circuit of gas absorption heat pumps up to 0,70 % by weight (as Cr(VI)) in the refrigerant solution | 26 August 2034 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2022) 6036

26 August 2022

Sodium chromate

EC No. 231-889-5, CAS No. 7775-11-3

Ariston Thermo SpA., Viale Aristide Merloni 45, 60044 Fabriano, Italy

REACH/22/26/0

As an anticorrosion agent of the carbon steel in sealed circuit of gas absorption heat pumps up to 0,70 % by weight (as Cr(VI)) in the refrigerant solution

26 August 2034

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2955 

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 

to expand the cause of action relating to the pattern or practice of 

conduct by a governmental authority that deprives a person of rights 

protected by the Constitution to such conduct relating to adults as 

well as juveniles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 7, 2015 

Mr. DEUTCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement 

Act of 1994 to expand the cause of action relating to 

the pattern or practice of conduct by a governmental 

authority that deprives a person of rights protected by 

the Constitution to such conduct relating to adults as 

well as juveniles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Right to Counsel and 

5 Taxpayer Protection Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2955 IH

1 SEC. 2. PATTERN OR PRACTICE LITIGATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 210401(a) of the Violent 

3 Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (42 

4 U.S.C. 14141(a)) is amended— 

5 (1) after ‘‘responsibility for the administration 

6 of’’, by striking ‘‘juvenile justice’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘criminal justice, juvenile justice,’’; and 

8 (2) after ‘‘or the incarceration of’’, by striking 

9 ‘‘juveniles’’ and inserting ‘‘persons (including juve10 niles)’’. 

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 210401(b) of 

12 the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 

13 1994 (42 U.S.C. 14141(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘para14 graph (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### MACE v. STATE.

No. 15870.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 19, 1933.

L. D. Johnston, of Waxahachie, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LAT.TIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for burglary; punishment, ten years in the penitentiary.

We find in the record an affidavit made by the sheriff of Ellis county certifying that pending this appeal appellant made his escape from custody, and that he did not voluntarily return. Such escape deprives this court of further jurisdiction of the appeal, and it becomes our duty to dismiss such appeal, and it is accordingly so done.
*OPINION ISSUED MAY 14, 2009*

#### FRANK MCKEIVER VS. REGIONAL JAIL AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITY

(CC-09-0070)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Ronald R. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant, a former inmate at the Tygart Valley Regional Jail, seeks $ 199.00 plus tax for his diamond earring that was missing when he was released from the facility on February 2, 2009

In its Answer, respondent admits the validity of the claim and that the amount is fair and reasonable. The Court is aware that respondent does not have a fiscal method for paying claims of this nature; therefore, the claim has been submitted to this Court for determination.

This Court has taken the position in prior claims that if a bailment situation has been created, respondent is responsible for property of an inmate which is taken from that inmate, remains in its custody, and is not produced for return to the inmate.

Accordingly, the Court makes an award to the claimant herein in the amount of $210.94.

Award of $210.94.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

GORDON ARTHUR WOODLEY AND DENISE LYNN 

WOODLEY,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DANIEL HAGGART AND KATHY HAGGART, FOR 

THEMSELVES AND AS REPRESENTATIVES OF A 

CLASS OF SIMILARLY SITUATED PERSONS,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2014-5106

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 1:09-cv-00103-CFL, Judge Charles F. 

Lettow. 

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

Case: 14-5106 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 09/25/2014
2 WOODLEY v. US

PER CURIAM. 

O R D E R

Daniel Haggart et al. (“Class Members”) move to 

strike certain pages from appellants’ appendix. Appellants oppose. Class Members also move to dismiss appellants’ appeal as frivolous and for summary affirmance. 

Appellants and the United States oppose. 

The court deems it the better course for the Class 

Members to raise their arguments for affirmance and 

their arguments to strike in their response brief. 

Accordingly,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

 (1) The motion to strike is denied. The parties are 

directed to address whether the documents are properly 

before the court in their briefs. 

 (2) The motion to dismiss or for summary affirmance 

is denied. The appellees’ response briefs are due within 

40 days of the date of filing of this order.

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk of Court

s24

Case: 14-5106 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 09/25/2014
#### MILLER v. STINE, Judge.

No. 1935—6520.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.

Feb. 26, 1936.

Benson & Benson, of Bowie, for relator.

Vincent Stine, of Henrietta, pro se.

GERMAN, Commissioner.

This is an original mandamus proceeding brought by Estell Miller, a feme sole, against Honorable Vincent Stine, judge of the district court of the Ninety-Seventh judicial district of Texas. The purpose of the suit is to compel the respondent to enter 'judgment in favor of relator in the case of Estell Miller v. R. L. McClure, tried in the district court of Montague county on April 13, 1933.

On careful inspection of the record we find that R. L. McClure, defendant in the cause mentioned, has not been a party to this proceeding, and has filed no answer herein. He being a necessary party, the order allowing filing of the petition was improvidently entered. Williams v. Wray, 123 Tex. 466, 72 S.W.(2d) 577, and authorities cited.

Since the filing of the petition in this case the Supreme Court has again taken occasion to specifically declare that in all cases where the Court of Civil Appeals has power to issue writs of mandamus, this court will not permit the filing of petitions for such writs. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. Watkins et al. (Tex. Sup.) 86 S.W.(2d) 1081.

The petition for mandamus is' therefore dismissed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
Appeal Dismissed and Opinion Filed September 26, 2012

In The

Qiuttrt nf rah

ifth 1iitrirt tif xaa at 1at1a

No. 05-12-00691-CR

KATHRYN BARNETT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-61769-M

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before ChiefJustice Wright and Justices Bridges and Myers

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s counsel has approved the

motion. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the appeal be DISMISSED and this

decision be certified below for observance. See TEx. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish

TEx. R. App. P. 47

120691F.U05
EXHIBIT 11

                           SBI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                           FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
                           JUNE 30 , 1997 AND 1998

                                             Six Months        Six Months
                                               Ended              Ended
                                           June 30, 1998     June 30, 1999
                                           --------------   --------------
Shares outstanding:                           5,570,439        5,570,439
Weighted average shares outstanding           5,570,439        5,570,439
Net loss                                   $   (280,209)    $   (280,209)
Preferred Dividend                                --               --
                                           --------------   --------------
Total                                          (280,209)        (280,209)
Net loss per share                         $      (0.05)   $       (0.05)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         October 25, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G58, Rockville, MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Anuja Mathew, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G58, Rockville, MD 20892, 301-761-6911,                         *anuja.mathew@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

 Dated: September 19, 2024.

Lauren A. Fleck,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-21862 Filed 9-24-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Opinion issued November 8, 2013.

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00687-CV

———————————

IN RE SUNCOAST ENVIRONMENTAL & CONSTRUCTION INC, AJAZ 

R. SIDDIQUI AND NAJEEB R. SIDDIQUI, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

By petition for writ of mandamus, relators, Suncoast Environmental & 

Construction, Inc., Ajaz R. Siddiqui, and Najeeb R. Siddiqui, seek mandamus 

relief from the trial court’s August 2, 2013, order granting plaintiff Shawn Ibrahim, 

Inc.’s motion to strike relators’ designation of responsible third parties. Real party 

 1 The underlying case is Shawn Ibrahim, Inc. v. Suncoast Environmental & 

Construction, Inc., cause number 2011-02593, pending in the 61st District Court 

of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Al Bennett presiding.
2

in interest Shawn Ibrahim, Inc., has filed a motion for sanctions, and Relators have 

filed an emergency motion for a stay of trial proceedings.

We DENY the petition for writ of mandamus, DENY the motion for 

sanctions, and DENY the emergency motion for stay.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.