alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BREWER v. STATE.

No. 15056.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 16, 1932.

A. H. Mount, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for tbe State.

CALHOUN, J.

Tbe offense, keeping a bawdy bouse; tbe punishment, a fine of $200 and 20 days’ confinement in tbe county jail.

Tbe record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in tbe indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

Tbe judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Tbe foregoing opinion of tbe Commission of Appeals has been examined by tbe judges of tbe Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by tbe court
CERTIFICATION*
     /s/ Igor Gonda
    
    /s/ Nancy E. PecotaPresident and Chief Executive Officer
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDated: November 12, 2008
    
    Dated: November 12, 2008
 
 *
    
    This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
Aradigm Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2897 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2897

  To require the submission of a report to the Congress on parasitic 
                     disease among poor Americans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2015

   Mr. Johnson of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. 
 Rangel, Ms. Clarke of New York, Ms. Norton, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. 
Fattah, and Mr. Rush) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the submission of a report to the Congress on parasitic 
                     disease among poor Americans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Neglected Infections of Impoverished 
Americans Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. REPORT TO CONGRESS ON THE CURRENT STATE OF PARASITIC DISEASES 
              THAT HAVE BEEN OVERLOOKED AMONG THE POOREST AMERICANS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 12 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 
report to the Congress on the epidemiology of, impact of, and 
appropriate funding required to address neglected diseases of poverty, 
including neglected parasitic diseases such as--
            (1) Chagas disease;
            (2) cysticercosis;
            (3) toxocariasis;
            (4) toxoplasmosis;
            (5) trichomoniasis;
            (6) the soil-transmitted helminths; and
            (7) other related parasitic diseases, as designated by the 
        Secretary.
    (b) Required Information.--The report under subsection (a) should 
provide the information necessary to guide future health policy to--
            (1) accurately evaluate the current state of knowledge 
        concerning diseases described in such subsection and define 
        gaps in such knowledge; and
            (2) address the threat of such diseases.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 17-1653

ELBA I. FALTO DE ROMÁN,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OF MAYAGÜEZ; JOSE GUILLERMO RODRIGUEZ, as 

Mayor of the City of Mayagüez,

Defendants, Appellees,

ELENA MARTINEZ, as Member of the Board of Directors of the HeadStart Program, Mayagüez; LUIS OLIVERAS, as Member of the Board 

of Directors of the Head-Start Program, Mayagüez; LUIS OJEDA, as 

Member of the Board of Directors of the Head-Start Program, 

Mayagüez; CARLOS GONZALEZ, as Member of the Board of Directors 

of the Head-Start Program, Mayagüez; EFRAIN DE JESUS; LISAIRA 

DIAZ-NADAL; LUIS BALAGUER; ELIDA CARABALLO; FRANCISCO FIGUEROA; 

LOURDES FELICIANO; NITZIA LAMBERTY; LUIS RAMOS; RICHARD ROE, as 

Member of the Council of Policy Rules, Mayagüez; JOHN DOE, as 

Member of the Council of Policy Rules, Mayagüez; JANE DOE, as 

Member of the Board of Directors of the Head-Start Program, 

Mayagüez; JANE DOE, as Member of the Council of Policy Rules, 

Mayagüez; RICHARD ROE, as Member of the Board of Directors of 

the Head-Start Program, Mayagüez; JOHN DOE, as Member of the 

Board of Directors of the Head-Start Program, Mayagüez; JANE 

DOE, as Member of the Council of Policy Rules, Mayagüez,

Defendants.

_____________________

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on August 22, 2022, is 

amended as follows:

On page 11, line 8 insert a space between "Rule" and "50(b)"
On page 12, lines 3-4 remove quotation marks before and 

after parenthetical phrase

On page 12, line 3 insert a space between "78" and "F.3d"

On page 12, lines 4-6 remove "See BB 5.2(f)(ii), (iii) (only 

permitting the omission of quoting parentheticals beyond the 

first level); BB 10.6.3 (same)."

On page 12, line 14 "they" should be "he"

On page 12, line 14 remove "now"

On page 13, line 14 remove "Finally, the jury was instructed 

that if it found"

On page 14, line 3 "appellants" should be "appellees"
|Exhibit 12                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|                                                                
|The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company and Subsidiary Companies 
|                                                                
|Statement Re:  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|(Dollars in Thousands)                                          
|                                                                
|                                                                
|                                                                
|                                                                
|                                                                
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Net Income Before Preferred                                     
|Stock Dividends                                                 
|                                                                
|Add - Income Taxes                                              
|Fixed Charges excluding capitalized interest                    
|                                                                
|Earnings                                                        
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Fixed Charges including capitalized interest                    
|                                                                
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                              
|
#### George HALL, alias George Watson, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 20462.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 7, 1939.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 18, 1939.

John Morison, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for burglary; the punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

This case involves the validity of proceedings to revoke a suspension of sentence, and is in every respect similar to the case of Porter v. State, 131 S.W.2d 964, this day decided by us but not yet reported [in State report]. The same legal question was presented here as was presented in that case.

Having fully discussed the question in that case and finally disposed of it, we see no need of again discussing it.

For the reasons there assigned, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL AP PEALS OF TENNES SEE AT NAS HVILLE A ssi gne d on Br ie fs A ugus t 9, 200 5 STATE OF TENNESS EE v . KERVI N MERCEL COL LI NS
Direc t Appeal from the Cr im inal Cou rt for Davidson Coun ty No. 2003-B-1536 M ark J. F ishb urn, Jud ge

No. M2004- 01995-CCA -R3-C D - F iled Janu ary 31, 2006

D AVI D G. H AYES , J

. , d i s s en t i n g. Th e ma jority c on c lud e s th a t th e tria l c ou rt c ommit ted reve rsib le e rr or by faili ng to g rant a mistrial. I

respe ctfully

dissent. The majority opines that trial counsel’s overr eac hing rema rks made du ri ng his op e nin g state me nt, inf ormin g the jury

that it wa s th e vic tim

wh o f ir st s truc k th e de fe nd a nt, s o t i l t e d t h e s c a l e s o f

j u s t i c e a s t o r e q u i r e t h e g r a n t i n g o f a m i s tr i a l f o r r e a s o n s o f

m a n i f e s tn e c e s s i t y. See ge nerally Millbrooks , 8 19 S.W. 2da t 44 3; Zimmerman , 823 S.W .2d at 226. Appellate r eview of

a trial court’s decision to g rant or deny a mot ion for mistrial must take into account the trial court’s g reater a dvantag e in assessing the t rial proceeding over w hich the trial judge is presiding . Thus, a motion for mistrial is addresse d to the sound discretion of the trial court and is not to be g rante d except for manif est nec essity

. Re id , 91 S.W .3d at 279. For this reason , a n app e llate c ou rt ’s re vie w s ho uldpr ov ide c on sid e ra ble de fe re nc e to the tria l c ou rt ’s ru lin g in determining whe ther a n occur renc e or e vent at trial has so prejudice d the def endant or the State as to pr eclude a fair and impartial ve rdict. W illiams , 929 S.W .2d at 388. The de cision of the trial c ourt is, theref ore, r ever sible only

if there has bee n an abuse of discre tion. Re id , 91 S.W .3d at 279.
Her e, the tria l judge hear d the err oneous rema rk made during the opening statement of tria l and wa s able to obser ve and a ssess its impac t upon the jury once the jury

learned the state ment was err oneous. Clearly , in this reg ard, the trial court was in the best position to det er m i n e i f t h e jury would be biase d by

the statement, thus, pre cluding an impartial ve rdict. Trial counse l’s err oneous statement that the vic tim wa s the first ag g ressor was but an isolated piece of evide nce in a n otherwise ove rwhe lming presentation of proof that the defendant wa s indeed the a g g r e s s o r . A c c o r d in g ly , I f in d th a t e v e n if tria l c o u n s e l h a d n o t mi s - c h ar a c te r iz e d the proof du ri ng his op e nin g state me nt, the ou tc ome a t tria l w ou ld n ot h a ve be e n d if fe re nt.
B e c aus e I fi ndno abu se of

dis c re tio n, I

wo ulda ff

ir m th e jud g me nt o f the tr ia l c ou rt

.

____________________________________ DAVID G. HAY ES, J UDGE
# C_2022273EN.01001101.xml

| 15.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/11

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2022/C 273/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 28.6.2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.103406 |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCF: Fodder Support Scheme |
| Legal basis | Ministers and Secretaries Act 1924 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 56 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2022 |
| Economic sectors | Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine |
| Government Buildings, Abbeyleix Road, Portlaoise, County Laois, Ireland |

Date of adoption of the decision

28.6.2022

Aid number

SA.103406

Member State

Ireland

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCF: Fodder Support Scheme

Legal basis

Ministers and Secretaries Act 1924

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 56 000 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2022

Economic sectors

Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine

Government Buildings, Abbeyleix Road, Portlaoise, County Laois, Ireland

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04380**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 04380\04380_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04380\04380_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04380\04380_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

04380\Certification Statement Plant ID 04380.pdf Plant certification statement x 04380\Supplemental Documents\004380_9-08-10 Plant Water Balance Final.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04380\Supplemental Documents\04380_09-08-10 Plant Water Balance Final.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04380\04380_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04380\04380_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
Exhibit 21-A


                        OTTER TAIL POWER COMPANY

                      Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                             March 1, 2000


Company                                        State of Organization

Minnesota-Dakota Generating Company                  Minnesota
Otter Tail Realty Company                            Minnesota
Otter Tail Management Corporation*                   Minnesota
ORD Corporation*                                     Minnesota
Quadrant Co.*                                        Minnesota
Midwest Information Systems, Inc.                    Minnesota
Midwest Telephone Co.                                Minnesota
Osakis Telephone Company                             Minnesota
The Peoples Telephone Company of Bigfork             Minnesota
Data Video Systems, Inc.                             Minnesota
Otter Tail Communications SD, Inc.                   South Dakota
MIS Investments, Inc.                                Minnesota
Varistar Corporation                                 Minnesota
Precision Machine, Inc.                              Minnesota
Dakota Machine, Inc.                                 North Dakota
Dakota Engineering, Inc.*                            North Dakota
Aerial Contractors, Inc.                             North Dakota
Moorhead Electric, Inc.                              Minnesota
Diagnostic Medical Systems, Inc.                     North Dakota
DMS Imaging, Inc.                                    North Dakota
DMS Leasing Corporation                              North Dakota
BTD Manufacturing, Inc.                              Minnesota
Northern Pipe Products, Inc.                         North Dakota
Northern Micro, Inc.                                 North Dakota
Fargo Baseball, LLC                                  Minnesota
Fargo Sports Concession LLC                          Minnesota
Chassis Liner Corporation                            Minnesota
Chassis Liner Credit Corp. *                         Minnesota
Otter Tail Energy Services Company, Inc.             Minnesota
Mid-States Testing Company                           Minnesota
Otter Tail Energy Management Company                 Minnesota
E. W. Wylie Corporation                              North Dakota
Vinyltech Corporation                                Arizona



*Inactive
Opinion issued November 8, 2013
.

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01
- 13
- 00687
- CV

——————————— IN RE SUNCOAST ENVIR ONMENTAL & CONSTRUCT ION INC, AJAZ R. SIDDIQUI AND NAJE EB R. SIDDIQUI , Relator s

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus 1

MEMORANDUM OPINION By petition for writ of mandamus, relator s , Suncoast Environmental & Construction, Inc., Ajaz R. Siddiqui, and Najeeb R. Siddiqui, seek mandamus
relief from the trial court’s August 2 , 2013 , order granting plaintiff Shawn Ibrahim, Inc.’s motion to strike relators’ designation of responsible third parties. Real party

1 The underlying case is Shawn Ibrahim, Inc. v. Suncoast Environmental & Construction, Inc. , cause number 2011

- 02593, pending in the 61st District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honor able Al Bennett presiding.2 in interest Shawn Ibrahim, Inc., has filed a motion for sa nctions, and Relators have filed an emergency motion for a s tay of trial proceedings.
We DENY the petition for writ of mandamus , DENY the motion for sanctions, and DENY the emergency motion for stay

. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
Exhibit
      32.1








**Chief
      Executive Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Edward V. Lett, President and Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operation of the Company.








Date: 
                August 9, 2007
            /s/
                Edward V. LettEdward
                V. Lett
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to TIB Financial Corp. and will be retained
      by
      TIB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements:(1) Registration Statement (Form S-3 Nos. 333-38246, 333-38218, 333-109682) of SpartechCorporation and Subsidiaries, and (2) Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 33-61322, 333-60316, 333-60381, 333-30878, 333-113752)of Spartech Corporation and Subsidiariesof our reports dated January 10, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedules of Spartech Corporation and Subsidiaries, Spartech Corporation and Subsidiariesmanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Spartech Corporation andSubsidiaries, included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 29, 2005.                                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP         St. Louis, Missouri
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR &

INDUSTRIES,

Respondent,

v.

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF KING

COUNTY,

Appellant. No. 80408

- 1

- I

ORDER GRANTING MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION,

WITHDRAWING OPINION,

AND SUBSTITUTING OPINION

Respondent, Department of Labor and Industries

, has filed a motion for

reconsideration of the opinion filed in t he above matter on June 8, 2020. The court has

determined that respondent ’s motion for reconsideration should be granted

, the opinion

should be withdrawn and a substitute opinion be filed. Now, therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that respondent ’s moti on for reconsideration is granted

. It is further

ORDERED th at the opinion fi led on June 8, 2020 , is withdrawn and a substitute

opinion be filed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,139
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,232
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,036
<PP&E>                                          82,418
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,000
<BONDS>                                          8,996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           215
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,893
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,535
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,020
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    601
<INCOME-TAX>                                       228
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                373
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       373
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>