alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2052

GREER C. SALYERS, Petitioner, versus CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (98-1312-BLA, 97-1902-BLA) Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: February 7, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Greer C. Salyers, Petitioner Pro Se. Timothy Ward Gresham, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia; Patricia May Nece, Barry H. Joyner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Greer C. Salyers seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1999). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Salyers v. Clinchfield Coal Co. BRB No. 98-1312-BLA (B.R.B. July 2, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 4- 31 06

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Bo utui vi Ahl in San ve e ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt
v. Hen ne pi n C ou nt y

Hum anServ ic es ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Dis tri ctof M in ne so ta- Mi nn eap ol is

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Apri l 1 , 20 15 Fil ed : Ap ril 6, 2 01 5 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, MURPHY, an d GRUENDER, Ci rcu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM. Bo utui vi San ve e ap pe al s fro m th e fin al jud gm en t of th e di stric t co urt, en te red 1 up on th ree se pa rat e ad ve rs e or de rs di sp os in g of hi s cl a i ms . Afte r care fu l de no vo The Hon or ab le Ri ch ard H. Ky le , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ct 1 of Mi nn es ot a, ad op ti ng th e rep orts an d re co m m en da ti on s o f th e Hon or ab le Jan ie S. Mayeron , Uni te d S ta te s M ag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ctof M in ne so ta
.rev ie w, se e Mo nt go m ery v. Ci ty of Am es , 74 9 F.3 d 68 9, 69 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 14 )

( s t a n d a r d of rev ie w fo r su m m ary jud gm en t), we co nc lu de th at th e di st ric t co ur t pr op erl y di sp os edof S an ve e’s cl ai m s. The jud gm en t i s af

firm ed . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2
-
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Quarterly Report of Park Bancorp, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 17, 2010, (the Report), I, David A. Remijas, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David A. RemijasDavid A. RemijasChairman and Chief Executive OfficerMay 17, 2010
# OAR Box 1828

Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 219 ) ll-K-(I)-3 2 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:56

AM Sheet 219 of 325 P. 1P. 2 

# A \ ° o II-K-(I)-3 2
INFORMAL ANALYSI S WORKIN G GROUP . BRIEFIN G O N IFCA M MODE L INPUT S AND ASSUMPTIONS . EEA , Inc . Septembe r 5 , 1979 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I)-3 2
|EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zones, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald P. McFadden, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 12, 2004
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /S/   RONALD P MCFADDEN
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | Ronald P. McFadden     
| |  | Chief Financial Officer

|
|
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
VERNA EILEEN ROBERTSON, ) ) Appellant, ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4425 ) U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ) as Indenture Trustee for CIM Trust ) 2015-4AG Mortgage-Backed Notes ) Series 2015-4AG, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed April 24, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Jack Day, Judge. Mark P. Stopa, Esq. of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa, (withdrew after briefing); Latasha Scott, Esq., of Lord Scott, P.A., Tampa (withdrew after briefing); Richard J. Mockler, Esq., of Stay In My Home, P.A., Tampa (withdrew after breifing); Ivan D. Ivanov, Esq., of Ivanov & Wolf, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Nancy N. Wallace, Esq., of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee; William P. Heller, Esq. of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale; and Brandon G. Forgione, Esq, of Akerman, LLP., West Palm Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.- 2 - Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
# C_2022333EN.01000201.xml

| 1.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 333/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 333/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10803 – ELKEM / HYDRO ENERGI INVEST / ALTOR FUND MANAGER / VIANODE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 333/02)

On 24 August 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10803. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10803. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
**Exhibit31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, Javier O. Lamoso,President of ClearComm, L.P., certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report ofClearComm, L.P.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; and

 

4.     The company’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

(a)         Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of thecompany’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

(c)         Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

5.     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)        All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)        Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: May 24, 2004 |   |                 |
|--------------------|--------|----------------------|
|               |   |                 |
|               |   | /s/ Javier O. Lamoso |
|               |   | Javier O. Lamoso     |
|               |   | President            |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of
Pacific Enterprises (the "Company") certifies that:

(i)	the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



February 23, 2005
                                               /S/ NEAL E. SCHMALE
                                              ______________________
                                               Neal E. Schmale
                                               Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 184 (Monday, September 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77546-77547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21648]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-255-LA-3]
ASLBP No. 24-986-01-LA-BD01


Establishment of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; Holtec 
Decommissioning International, LLC, and Holtec Palisades, LLC

    Pursuant to the Commission's regulations, see, e.g., 10 CFR 2.104, 
2.105, 2.300, 2.309, 2.313, 2.318, 2.321, notice is hereby given that 
an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is being established to 
preside over the following proceeding:

Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC, and Holtec Palisades, LLC 
(Palisades Nuclear Plant)

    Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC and Holtec Palisades, LLC 
seek four amendments to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-20 
to support the potential reauthorization of power operations at the 
Palisades Nuclear Plant, located in Covert Township, Michigan. In 
response to a notice filed in the Federal Register announcing the 
opportunity to request a hearing, see 89 FR 64,486 (Aug. 7, 2024), Alan 
Blind filed a hearing request on September 9, 2024.
    The Board is comprised of the following Administrative Judges:

Emily I. Krause, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dr. Gary S. Arnold, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dr. Arielle J. Miller, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001

    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule. See 10 CFR 2.302.


[[Page 77547]]


    Dated: September 17, 2024.
Edward R. Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, 
Rockville, Maryland.
[FR Doc. 2024-21648 Filed 9-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2854 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the occupational 

tax on gambling with respect to wagers authorized under State law. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2015 

Mr. HECK of Nevada (for himself and Mr. AMODEI) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the occupational tax on gambling with respect to wagers 

authorized under State law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF OCCUPATIONAL TAX ON GAMBLING 

4 WITH RESPECT TO WAGERS AUTHORIZED 

5 UNDER STATE LAW. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4411 of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘section 4401’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘section 4401(a)(2)’’, 

10 (2) by striking subsection (b), and 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2854 IH

1 (3) by striking ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’. 

2 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

3 this section shall apply to taxable periods beginning after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Mrs. Dora REAGAN, Appellant, v. Owen M. MURRAY, Receiver, Appellee.

No. 11612.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.

Dec. 2, 1933.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 6, 1934

H. D. Payne, of Moydada, for appellant.

John W. Pope, Sr., Lynn B. Milam, and Pat1 J. Howe, all of Dallas, for appellee.

BOND, Justice.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order of a district court of Dallas county, overruling appellant’s plea of privilege, filed in due order, in the suit of Owen M. Murray, Receiver, Appellee, v. Mrs. Dora Reagan, Appellant. Appellee controverted the plea by affidavit, stating that the suit is one involving property in custodia legis, in that the Ninety-Fifth district court of Dallas county had appointed him receiver of the North Texas Trust Company, Inc., and, as part of the assets of said company, he, as receiver, had taken possession of the paving certificates of special assessments issued by the governing body of the city of Floy dada, Tex., against appellant and her property, and that he, in the exercise of the rights conferred by said court, instituted suit in the receivership forum, and that it has the exclusive jurisdiction of said cause of action. Appellant filed an exception to the controverting affidavit, as showing no" exception to the venue statutes of this state (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 1995), which, by the court below, was overruled, and, on the unchallenged proof that there existed no exception to venue in the county of appellant’s residence, as provided by the venue statutes of this state, the court overruled appellant’s plea of privilege.

In the case of J. T. Kirk v. Owen M. Murray, Receiver, 67 S.W.(2d) 385 (this day decided by this court), analogous to the situation here and involving paving certificates of the same series issued by the same municipality as here disclosed, we held that the receiver’s cause of action was amenable to the venue statutes of this state, and the conclusion therein reached is applicable to the contentions here raised, making a further discussion of the issues here involved unnecessary.

We conclude that the action of the trial court in overruling appellant’s exception to appellee’s controverting affidavit cannot be sustained, and that the judgment of the lower court, in overruling the plea of privilege, should be reversed, appellant’s plea of privilege sustained, and the suit transferred to the district court of Floyd county, in accordance with the relating statutes, and it is so ordered.

Reversed, and remanded, with instructions.
# C_2022085EN.01000101.xml

| 22.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10604 – OXFORD PROPERTIES / PINEBRIDGE BENSON ELLIOT / SIGMA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 85/01)

On 15 February 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (Dhttp://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (Dhttp://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10604. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10604. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
' • RGL.ElVEi' 6PDL 

AIR F'LANNlifG SEO. 

May 14, 2014 

idr MAY 20 PM 6: 03 The Dow Chemical Company 

2301 N. Brazosport Blvd. 

Freeport, Texas 77541 

USA 

Certified Mail 7013 2250 00015913 9835 

Return Receipt Requested 

Wren Stenger 

Director, Multimedia Planning & Permitting Division 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 

Dallas, TX 75202-2733 

Dear Ms. Stenger: 

This letter is intended to select the GHG PSD permitting authority for the Light 

Hydrocarbon 9(LHC9) facility being built in Freeport, TX by The Dow Chemical 

Company (Dow). Since the dra$ permit for the LHC 9 GHG permit has been issued and 

the final permit will be issued shortly, Dow intends to proceed with EPA as the 

permitting authority. 

If you have any questions regarding Dow's intention to proceed with EPA as the 

permitting authority, please contact me at 979-238-3190. 

Sincerely, 

Oz441&z,4~ 

~Jarod D. Davis 

Regulatory Services Leader 

The Dow Chemical Company 

cc Mary Schwartz, Dow Chemical 

Cindy Rodriguez, Dow Chemical 

Cheryl Steves, Dow Chemical
----

----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                             |   |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                Robert W. Dunlap                                              |   |   |   |   |
| Robert                W. Dunlap                                                  |   |   |   |   |
| Chief                Executive Officer andChief                Financial Officer |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                             |   |   |   |   |
| Date:               December 12, 2007                                       |   |   |   |   |

----

----