alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****Certificationof Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and15d-14(a) promulgated under theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended****CERTIFICATION**I, Matthew M. Loar, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Genelabs Technologies, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 31, 2006 /s/ Matthew M. Loar  Matthew M. Loar   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.17

November 30, 2004

Cenvill Recreation, Inc.1601 Forum PlaceSuite 500West Palm Beach, Florida  33417Attn:  Mark F. Levy

Dear Mr. Levy:

We have agreed to the following amendments to that certain Promissory Note, dated August 30, 2004, in the amount of $2,000,000 (the “Note”), payable by nStor Technologies, Inc. to Cenvill Recreation, Inc., copiesof which are attached hereto. 

             1)         The maturity date of the Note is hereby extended from November 30, 2004 to January 15, 2005(“Maturity”).

Except as set forth in this letter, the Note remains unmodified and in full force and effect. 

Please indicate your concurrence with the foregoing.

Sincerely,

                                                                       Cenvill Recreation, Inc.

/s/ ToddGresham                                            Agreed By: /s/ Mark F. LevyToddGresham                                                                        Mark F. LevyPresident                                                                                 Vice President and Secretary

**6190 Corte Del Cedro * Carlsbad * California * 92009(760) 683-2500 * fax (760) 683-2544**
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2928 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 19, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 201 B Street in Perryville, Arkansas, as the 

‘‘Harold George Bennett Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2928 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. HAROLD GEORGE BENNETT POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 201 B Street in Perryville, Ar4 kansas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Harold 

5 George Bennett Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Harold George Ben10 nett Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 18, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |  |
| INDIANA                                        | 35-1544218 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

----

----

----

|             |             |
|-------------|-------------|
| Exhibit No. | Description |

|      |                                                                              |
|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 99.1 | Press Release, dated October 22, 2015, issued by First Merchants Corporation |
1

Assessing	the	Effect	of	Five	Gasoline	Properties	on	Exhaust	Emissions	from	LightDuty	Vehicles	certified	to	Tier-2	Standards

Analysis	of	Data	from	EPA	Phase	3

(EPAct/V2/E-89)

Appendix	I.2f

Final	Model	Fitting

Non-Methane	Organic	Gases (NMOG)	(Bag	3)

No. Observations: 837

No. Vehicles: 15 

No. censored measurements: 119

No. missing measurements: 0

No. measurements removed: 0

Model Type: Tobit regression
2

Models fit for NMOG (Bag 3): (Grand Intercept not fit by Tobit models).

Model Term Notation Model

Full FM41FM5 FM6 FM7 FM8 FM9 FM10

etOH Ze ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

Arom Za ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ×

RVP Zr ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

T50 Z5 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

T90 Z9 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

etOH × etOH ZZee ● ×

T50 × T50 ZZ55 ● ● ● ● ×

etOH × Arom ZZea ● ● ×

etOH × RVP ZZer ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

etOH × T50 ZZe5 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

etOH × T90 ZZe9 ● ×

Arom × RVP ZZar ● ● ● ● ● ×

Arom × T50 ZZa5 ● ×

Arom × T90 ZZa9 ● ● ● ×

T50 × T90 ZZ59 ● ×

RVP × T90 ZZr9 ● ● ● ● ● ● ×

1

denotes “Full minus 4, etc.”

NMOG (Bag 3): Model fitting history, starting with the 16-term extended model.

Fit Parameters Test with respect to

Previous Model

Model p-1

1

-2lnL Dev. d Pr>χ

2

Full Model 16 2605.071

FM4 12 2605.748 0.677 4 0.954

FM5 11 2605.753 0.005 1 0.944

FM6 10 2606.328 0.575 1 0.448

FM7 9 2607.179 0.851 1 0.356

FM8 8 2607.668 0.489 1 0.484

FM9 7 2608.221 0.553 1 0.457

FM1026 2608.338 0.117 1 0.732

1 Total number of terms excludes the intercept, as the Tobit

Models do not fit intercepts.

2 Best fit with respect to the 16-term extended model.
3

NMOG (Bag 3): Coefficients and Tests of Effect for the Full and Reduced Models, with respect to 

the 16-term extended model (NOTE: model fitting with respect to the 11-term design model gives 

the same results).

Effect Full Model (Extended) Reduced Model (FM10)

Estimate Std. Err. d.f. χ2 value Pr>χ2 Estimate Std. Err. d.f. χ2 value Pr>χ2

Intercept -5.48891

Z e-0.0088 0.0603 1 0.0200 0.8841 0.0339 0.0438 1 0.60 0.44

Z a-0.0158 0.0378 1 0.17 0.6757 1

Z r-0.0824 0.0509 1 2.62 0.1058 -0.0572 0.0384 1 2.22 0.14

Z 5 0.0207 0.0672 1 0.090 0.7585 0.0783 0.0466 1 2.82 0.093

Z 9 0.1406 0.0391 1 12.9 0.0003 0.1467 0.0345 1 18.1 <.0001

ZZee -0.0122 0.0702 1 0.030 0.862

ZZ55 -0.0510 0.0573 1 0.79 0.3732

ZZea -0.0307 0.0569 1 0.29 0.5893

ZZer 0.0804 0.0386 1 4.33 0.0374 0.0707 0.0337 1 4.4000 0.036

ZZe5 -0.0802 0.0742 1 1.17 0.2798 -0.0728 0.0344 1 4.4800 0.034

ZZe9 0.0119 0.0456 1 0.070 0.7934

ZZar -0.0601 0.0615 1 0.95 0.3285

ZZa5 -0.0435 0.0689 1 0.40 0.5279

ZZa9 -0.0303 0.0386 1 0.62 0.4319

ZZ59 0.0256 0.0514 1 0.25 0.6182

ZZr9 0.0521 0.0435 1 1.43 0.2313

4.49892

1.0095 1.0109

1

 Not fit by the Tobit model; calculated as mean of 

intercepts for individual vehicles.

2

 Not fit by Tobit model; calculated as variance of 

intercepts for individual vehicles.

2

veh

2


# CI2022014EN.01000501.xml

| 12.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 14/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 14/5

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10563 – ENGIE SPAIN / PREDICA / EOLIA)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 14 I/05)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | ENGIE España Renovables, S.L. (‘ENGIE Spain’, Spain), ultimately controlled by ENGIE, S.A. (‘ENGIE’, France), |
| --- | --- |

—

ENGIE España Renovables, S.L. (‘ENGIE Spain’, Spain), ultimately controlled by ENGIE, S.A. (‘ENGIE’, France),

| — | Predica Prévoyance Dialogue du Crédit Agricole S.A. (‘Predica’, France), belonging to the Groupe Crédit Agricole (France), |
| --- | --- |

—

Predica Prévoyance Dialogue du Crédit Agricole S.A. (‘Predica’, France), belonging to the Groupe Crédit Agricole (France),

| — | Eolia Renovables de Inversiones, Sociedad de Capital Riesgo, S.A. (‘Eolia’, Spain). |
| --- | --- |

—

Eolia Renovables de Inversiones, Sociedad de Capital Riesgo, S.A. (‘Eolia’, Spain).

ENGIE Spain and Predica acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Eolia.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | ENGIE Spain is a newly incorporated company belonging to ENGIE. ENGIE is active in the fields of natural gas, electricity and energy services, |
| --- | --- |

—

ENGIE Spain is a newly incorporated company belonging to ENGIE. ENGIE is active in the fields of natural gas, electricity and energy services,

| — | Predica is a life and health insurance company, |
| --- | --- |

—

Predica is a life and health insurance company,

| — | Eolia is active in the generation of renewable energy and the development, construction and operation of wind farms and solar photovoltaic facilities in Spain. |
| --- | --- |

—

Eolia is active in the generation of renewable energy and the development, construction and operation of wind farms and solar photovoltaic facilities in Spain.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10563 – ENGIE SPAIN / PREDICA / EOLIA

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00219-CR

Robert Keith Bricker, Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 53186, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In March 2002, appellant Robert Keith Bricker, Jr., pleaded guilty to burglary. See

Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 30.02 (West 2003). He was convicted by the court and sentenced to ten years

in prison, but imposition of sentence was suspended and he was placed on community supervision.

In April 2003, appellant pleaded true to the allegations made in the State’s motion to revoke. The

court revoked supervision and imposed the ten-year sentence.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573

S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.
2

Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, who was advised of his

right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The order revoking community supervision is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: December 11, 2003

Do Not Publish
#### WYNN v. STATE.

No. 16898.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 6, 1934.

P. P. Long, of Carthage, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, and his punishment' assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of one year.

*273Tlie record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
LUGUS IP LLC, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

VOLVO CAR CORPORATIO N, VOLVO CARS OF NORTH AMERICA LLC, Defendants

- Appellees

______________________

2014

- 1743

______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in No. 1:12

- cv

- 02906

- JEI

- JS, Judge Joseph E. Irenas.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J OHN R OBERT F UISZ , The Fuisz

- Kundu Group LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also represented by S UDIP K UMAR K UNDU

.

M ATTHEW J. M OORE , Latham & Watkins LLP, Was hington, DC, argued for defendant s-appellees . Also repr esented by G ABRIEL B ELL
, J ONATHAN D. L INK
, R OBERT J. G AJARSA ; A RNOLD B. C ALMANN , Saiber LLC, Newark, NJ.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (R EYNA
, S CHALL
, and H UGHES
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

May 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
#### ROSS v. STATE.

No. 20744.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 10, 1940.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of cattle theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense charged in the indictment. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. No error has been presented authorizing a reversal of the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

February 8, 2019

No. 04

- 17

- 00514

- CV

Judith Ann MIEARS and Patricia Anderson

,

Appellant s

v.

Jean MCPHERSON, Appellee s
From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 0659

- CV

- A Honorable Jessica Crawford, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On January 16, 2019, this court issued its opinion and judgment. A motion for en banc reconsideration wa s due on January 31, 2019

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49. 7

. On February 5, 2019, within fifteen days after the motion for en banc reconsideration was due, see id. R. 49.8, Appell ants filed a n unopposed motion for a n extension of time to file a motion for en banc reconsideration until February 20, 2019.
Appell ants’ motion for extens ion of time is GRANTED. Appell ants’ motion f or en banc reconsideration is due on February 20, 2019

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of February, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Applera Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Tony L. White, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Tony L. White      
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|Date: August 24, 2007
# C_2022130EN.01001201.xml

| 23.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/12

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 130/10)

Decision granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2022) 1499 | 16 March 2022 | 4-(1,1,3,3-Tetra methylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated
  (4-tert-OPnEO)
  EC No: -, CAS No:- | Sanquin Reagents B.V., Plesmanlaan 125, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands | REACH/22/18/0 | In formulation of mixtures for IVD kits | 4 January 2028 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2022) 1499

16 March 2022

4-(1,1,3,3-Tetra methylbutyl)phenol, ethoxylated

(4-tert-OPnEO)

EC No: -, CAS No:-

Sanquin Reagents B.V., Plesmanlaan 125, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands

REACH/22/18/0

In formulation of mixtures for IVD kits

4 January 2028

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).

---
Order entered June 27, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00031-CV

JOY JACKSON-ATKINS, Appellant

V.

FREDERICK L. ATKINS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-02571

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case is overdue in this appeal. By postcard dated March 4, 

2014, we notified Glenda Johnson, Official Court Reporter for the 256th Judicial District Court 

that the reporter’s record was overdue. We directed Ms. Johnson to file the record within thirty 

days.

By order dated April 4, 2014 we again notified Ms. Johnson the reporters record was 

overdue and ordered her to file, within ten days of the date of that order, either: (1) the reporter’s 

record; (2) written verification that no hearings were recorded; or (3) written verification that 

appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the record. To date, Ms. Johnson has 

neither filed the record nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the record. This 

appeal cannot proceed without the issue of the reporter’s record being resolved.
Accordingly, this Court ORDERS court reporter Glenda Johnson to file the reporter’s 

record with TEN DAYS. We expressly CAUTION Glenda Johnson that failure to comply with 

this order may result in an order that she not sit as a court reporter until she complies. 

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

following persons:

Honorable David Lopez

Presiding Judge

256th Judicial District Court

George Allen Sr. Courts Building

600 Commerce Street, St. 440

Dallas, TX 75202

Glenda Johnson

Official Court Reporter

256th Judicial District Court

George Allen Sr. Courts Building

600 Commerce Street, St. 440

Dallas, TX 75202

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE