alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit31.2**

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

I, Edileen Salicrup, Acting Chief FinancialOfficer of ClearComm, L.P., certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed thisquarterly report of ClearComm, L.P.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)          Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)          Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: February 22, 2005

 
|   |   | /s/Edileen Salicrup             |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|   |   | Edileen Salicrup                |
|   |   | Acting Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICT Group, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Brennan, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                 |  |  |  |                                                                
|---------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                 |  | 
|November 3, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN J. BRENNAN                                         
|                 |  |  |  | John J. Brennan Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



As adopted pursuant to



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Park Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2004, (the Report), I, David A. Remijas, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David A. RemijasDavid A. RemijasPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 15, 2004
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

[letterhead of Deloitte & Touche] 

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-91048 of Gas Transmission Northwest Corporation on Form S-3 of our report dated March 29,2004, which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes emphasis paragraphs relating to the change in accounting for asset retirement obligations; and bankruptcy of the parent company and of an affiliated company, appearing in this Annual Reporton Form 10-K of Gas Transmission Northwest Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

DELOITTE &TOUCHE LLP 

 

Portland, Oregon 

March 29, 2004
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2018

a0523 

# Order

Clerk May 30, 2018

155197

DERNIA MARTINEZ,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 155197

COA: 329931

Kent CC: 14

- 008385

- NI

TMF II WATERCHASE, LLC,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

By order of June 7, 2017, the application for leave to appeal the December 15,

2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in

Martin v Milham Meadows I Ltd Partnership (Docket No. 154360). On order of the

Court, leave to appeal having been denied in Martin on March 9, 2018, ___ Mich ___

(2018), the application is again considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of

Stacke r v Lautrec, Ltd (Docket No. 155120) is pending on appeal before this Court and

that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the

decisio n in that case.

W ILDER , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
#### BILLINGSLEA v. STATE.

No. 16348.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 7, 1934.

Rehearing Denied March 28, 1934.

A. B. Haworth, of Comanche, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; .punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

A Mrs. Corbin lived in the little town of •Gustine, Comanche county, Tex. Appellant, who was her brother, lived there also. Mrs. •Corbin’s 18 year old son testified that on a ■certain occasion he helped appellant carry into a kind of blacksmith shop or toolhouse on said premises a tool box of whose contents witness was without knowledge. .Officers testified that on the occasion here in •question, armed, with a search warrant to ■search Mrs. Corbin’s premises, they went to the place, and, among others, searched this blacksmith shop or toolhouse, and observing the box and a number of empty whisky bottles' around it, they shook the box, then opened it, and found in it a considerable quantity of whisky. Each of the other persons who lived at said place was introduced as a witness, and all of them denied any knowledge of or ownership of, or connection with, said whisky. The record is here without any bills of exception. We deem the evidence sufficient.

The judgment will be affirmed.

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.

HAWKINS, Judge.

The motion for rehearing was placed in the mail on February 21st. The 15 days in which the motion could be filed expired on February 22d. The motion was received by the clerk of this court and filed on February 24th. Notwithstanding its delayed reception, the motion has been considered, and the facts again reviewed. Our opinion remains the same that the evidence amply supports the verdict, and the motion is overruled.
<table>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2
                             SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
                    COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  (Dollars in millions)
<caption>





                                1998        1999        2000        2001       2002
                              --------    --------    --------    --------   --------

                           <c>         <c>         <c>         <c>         <c>
Fixed Charges:

Interest                          $ 81        $ 62        $ 72        $ 70       $ 47
Interest portion of
  annual rentals                     4           3           4           3          2
                              --------    --------    --------    --------   --------
Total fixed charges
  for purpose of ratio            $ 85        $ 65        $ 76        $ 73       $ 49
                              ========    ========    ========    ========   ========

Earnings:

Pretax income from
  continuing operations           $287        $383        $390       $377        $391
Add: Total fixed charges
  (from above)                      85          65          76         73          49
                              --------    --------    --------    -------   ---------
Total earnings for
  purpose of ratio                $372        $448        $466       $450        $440
                              ========    ========    ========    =======   =========
Ratio of earnings
  to fixed charges                4.38        6.89        6.13       6.16        8.98
                              ========    ========    ========    =======   =========


</table>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21345]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage [supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service <SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service [supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 10, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage [supreg] Contract 317 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-650, CP2024-659.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21345 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2010-1045

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM101AD

A320-27A1186, R06 --- 12/14/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
# Dregon

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor
12110/2009
Mr. Michelle Pirzadeh EPA Region 10 1200 6th STE 900 

### Parks and Recreation Department State HistoricPreservationOffice 725 SummerSt NE, Ste C Salem, OR 97301-1266 (503) 986-0671 Fax (503) 986-0793 www.oregonheritage.org

Seattle, WA 98101-3140
RE: SHPO CaseNo. 09-2624 Siuslaw River Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site Proj 18S 12W 8,17, Florence vicinity, Lincoln County
Dear Michelle:
Our office recently received yourreport aboutthe project referenced above. Thankyou for informing me who the author ofthe report actually was. This is information that is needed by our office before we can enterthe report into our database. I have reviewed your report and agree that the project will have no affect on any known cultural resources. No further archaeological research is needed with this project. In looking through your report I did note that a Siuslaw Shipwreck Database is mentioned several times. Our office is trying to maintain a shipwreck database and the Corps report included much infonnation that was unknown to us. Our office would like to receive a copy ofthis database, ifpossible. A spatial copy would serve us best, if available, but ifnot a map showing the location ofthe known wreck sites along with whatever wreck infonnation is known wouldbe great. We will be sure and update our GIS system so that it accurately portrays the known datafor such wreck sites.
Please be aware, however, that ifduring development activities you or your staffencounters any cultural material (i.e., historic orprehistoric), all activities should cease immediately and an archaeologist should be contacted to evaluate the discovery. Under state law (ORS 358.905-955) it is a Class B misdemeanor to impact an archaeological site on public orprivate land in Oregon. Impacts to Native American graves and cultural items are considered a Class C felony (ORS 97.740-760). Ifyou have any questions regarding any future discovery or my letter, feel free to contact ouroffice at your convenience

.

•
..... d"··

..**-.-~ ~** **~//** ../ 

## ·....**/"---<~~** 

# :.zuer;;;is Griffin, Ph.D.,

# RPD

State Archaeologist (503) 986-0674 dennis.griffin@state.or.us
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2702 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to clarify the 

authority of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection with respect 

to persons regulated by a State insurance regulator, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2018 

Mr. SCOTT (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. ROUNDS, and Mr. MANCHIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 

to clarify the authority of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection with respect to persons regulated by 

a State insurance regulator, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Business of Insurance 

5 Regulatory Reform Act of 2018’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2702 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION TO THE AUTHORITY OF THE BU2 REAU WITH RESPECT TO PERSONS REGU3 LATED BY A STATE INSURANCE REGULATOR. 

4 Section 1027(f) of the Consumer Financial Protec5 tion Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5517(f)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

7 (A) in the paragraph heading, by striking 

8 ‘‘DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘EXCEPTIONS’’; 

10 (B) by striking ‘‘Paragraph (1)’’ and in11 serting the following: 

12 ‘‘(A) AUTHORITY.—Paragraph (1)’’; and 

13 (C) by inserting after subparagraph (A), 

14 as so designated, the following: 

15 ‘‘(B) LIMITATION.—With respect to a per16 son regulated by a State insurance regulator— 

17 ‘‘(i) if that person is offering or pro18 viding a consumer financial product or 

19 service, the Bureau may not enforce this 

20 title with respect to that person to the ex21 tent that the person is engaged in the busi22 ness of insurance; or 

23 ‘‘(ii) if that person is subject to any 

24 enumerated consumer law or any law for 

25 which authorities are transferred under 

26 subtitle F or H, the authority of the BuVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:54 Apr 21, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2702.IS S2702

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2702 IS

1 reau to enforce that law with respect to 

2 that person shall be narrowly construed to 

3 the extent that the person is engaged in 

4 the business of insurance.’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(4) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—The enforce7 ment of this title shall be broadly construed in favor 

8 of the authority of a State insurance regulator with 

9 respect to a person regulated by the State insurance 

10 regulator.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 25, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 25, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24D0309. JAMIE RUSSELL KIRKLAND v. SUSAN DENISE KIRKLAND.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

SU22DR075
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2679 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2679

 To provide for the admission to the United States of certain Tibetans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2015

    Mr. Sensenbrenner (for himself and Ms. Lofgren) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the admission to the United States of certain Tibetans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tibetan Refugee Assistance Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. TRANSITION FOR DISPLACED TIBETANS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the numerical limitations 
specified in sections 201 and 202 of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1151 and 1152), there shall be made available to 
qualified displaced Tibetans described in subsection (b) of this 
section 3,000 immigrant visas in the 3-fiscal-year period beginning 
with fiscal year 2016.
    (b) Qualified Displaced Tibetan Described.--
            (1) In general.--An individual is a qualified displaced 
        Tibetan if such individual is an individual who--
                    (A) is a native of Tibet; and
                    (B) since before the date of the enactment of this 
                Act, has been continuously residing in India or Nepal.
            (2) Native of tibet described.--For purposes of 
        subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), an individual shall be 
        considered to be a native of Tibet if such individual was born 
        in Tibet or is the son, daughter, grandson, or granddaughter of 
        an individual born in Tibet.
    (c) Distribution of Visa Numbers.--The Secretary of State shall 
ensure that immigrant visas provided under subsection (a) are made 
available to qualified displaced Tibetans described in subsection (b) 
(or described in subsection (d) as the spouse or child of such a 
qualified displaced Tibetan) in an equitable manner, giving preference 
to those qualified displaced Tibetans who are not resettled in India or 
Nepal or who are most likely to be resettled successfully in the United 
States.
    (d) Derivative Status for Spouses and Children.--A spouse or child 
(as defined in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), (D), or (E) of section 
101(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(b)(1))) 
shall, if not otherwise entitled to an immigrant status and the 
immediate issuance of a visa under this section, be entitled to the 
same status, and the same order of consideration, provided under this 
section, if accompanying, or following to join, the spouse or parent of 
such spouse or child.
                                 <all>
```
DISMISS; Opinion Filed March 31, 2014. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00625

- CV

MONTGOMERY A. KOWIS , Appellant

V.
CIRRO GROUP, INC., D /B/A CIRRO ENERGY , Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296

- 02077

- 2012



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices FitzGerald, Fillmore, and Evans Opinion by Justice Evans

Appellant’s brief in this case is overd ue. By postcard dated September 13, 2013, we

notified appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file both his

brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file his

brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice.

To date, appellant has not filed his brief, an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with

the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)(c).

/David Evans/

130625F.P05 DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

MONTGOMERY A. KOWIS, Appellant

No. 05

- 13

- 00625

- CV V.

CIRRO GROUP, INC., D/B/A CIRRO ENERGY, Appellee On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296

- 02077

- 2012. Opinion delivered by Justice Evans.

Justices FitzGerald and Fillmore participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee CIRRO GROUP, INC., D/B/A CIRRO ENERGY recover its costs of this appeal from appellant MONTGOMERY A. KOWIS.

Judgment entered this 31st day of March , 2014.

/David Evans/

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE