alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022240EN.01001201.xml

| 22.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10729 – FOWI / MOL / TOHO / HOKURIKU / ORSTED / JERA / SWA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 240/03)

On 16 June 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10729. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10729. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02128]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 19 February 2015, at 9:00 a.m. in the Commission offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street 
NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 
agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by emailing staff@cfa.gov; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated: 28 January 2015, in Washington, DC.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-02128 Filed 2-4-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
CONSULTING AGREEMENT

        This Consulting Agreement (the "Agreement") is made as of the 1st day of
March, 1999  between  Daniel J. Dolan ("Dolan") and  Outsourcing Solutions  Inc.
("OSI").

        WHEREAS,  prior to his  resignation,  Dolan  served  as  Executive  Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of OSI and, in that capacity, served in an
integral  role with  respect  to OSI's  financing  and  certain  other  business
activities (the "Activities"); and

        WHEREAS,  OSI wishes to retain  Dolan to  continue  to  provide  certain
advice to OSI from time to time in connection with the Activities, and Dolan has
agreed to provide such services.

        NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the  premises and other good and
valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:

        1. Services  Provided.  Dolan  shall  provide up  to 400 hours of advice
relative to the  Activities to OSI as requested by OSI.  Such services  shall be
performed at such times as are mutually acceptable to both parties.

        2. Duration of Contract.  This Agreement  shall be effective on the date
hereof, and shall continue until December 31, 1999.

        3. Compensation.

           (a)  Fees. For services provided hereunder, Dolan shall be paid a fee
of $134,400 in advance.

           (b)  Expenses. For travel incurred at OSI's direction, OSI will
reimburse Dolan his actual reasonable  expenses for meals and incidentals,  plus
the actual reasonable cost of transportation and lodging.

           (c)  Requests  for reimbursement  of  expenses  shall  be directed to
Daniel T. Pijut.  OSI shall promptly pay all such requests for reimbursement.

        4. Nature of  Relationship.  Dolan is retained by OSI as an  independent
contractor.  Dolan shall not enter into any agreement nor incur any  obligations
on OSI's  behalf,  nor commit OSI in any manner,  without  OSI's  prior  written
consent.

        5. Agreement and  Amendment.  This  Agreement  constitutes  the parties'
entire  agreement  and  supersedes  any  other  oral or  written  agreements  or
understandings  between the parties  regarding the subject matter  hereof.  This
Agreement may only be modified by a writing, signed by both parties.

        6.  Applicable  Law. This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of
Missouri.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the parties hereto,  intending to be legally bound,
have  hereunto  executed  this  Agreement  as of the day and year first  written
above.


DANIEL J. DOLAN

        /s/Daniel J. Dolan
        ------------------------------




OUTSOURCING SOLUTIONS INC.


        /s/Timothy G. Beffa
        ------------------------------
        Timothy G. Beffa
        President and Chief Executive Officer
### SCEC-18-0000908

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

MATTHEW S. LOPRESTI, Plaintiff,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI # I; SCOTT T. NAGO, as Chief Election Officer for the State of Hawai # i; and OFFICE OF ELECTIONS,

State of Hawai # i, Defendants.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DISMISSING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C

. J

. , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J

. )



### Upon consideration of plaintiff Matthew S. LoPresti’s motion for reconsideration, filed on January 30, 2019, the declaration and attachment that were filed on February 1, 2019, and the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is dismissed as untimely. See HRAP Rule 40(a) (“A motion for reconsideration may be filed by a party only within 10 days after the filing of the opinion, dispositional order, or ruling unless by special leave additional time is granted during such period by a judge or justice of the appellate court involved.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, February 7, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCEC-18-0000908 07-FEB-2019 01:24 PM
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

                STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (1)
                (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  THREE      THREE
                                                                 MONTHS      MONTHS
                                                                  ENDED      ENDED
                                                                DEC. 29,    DEC. 31,
                                                                  1996        1995
                                                                 ------     ------
<S>                                                              <C>        <C>   
Net income(1) ..............................................     $2,557     $1,940
                                                                 ======     ======
  Average shares outstanding ...............................      8,888      6,795
  Common equivalent shares .................................        132
  Assumed shares sold to prepay shareholder distribution (2)        890
                                                                 ------     ------
  Weighted average number of common shares .................      9,020      7,685
                                                                 ======     ======
  Earnings per common and common equivalent share ..........     $  .28     $  .25
                                                                 ======     ======
</TABLE>

(1)       The computation set forth for the three fiscal months ended December
          31, 1995, is based on pro forma net income which reflects the
          recording by the Company of additional taxes as if the Company were
          treated as a C corporation for all periods presented.

(2)      Reflects the estimated number of shares required to be sold by the
         Company (as calculated based upon the net proceeds of the initial
         public offering) to pay the pre-offering shareholder distributions of
         approximately $9,952. The total estimated shares of 890 were assumed to
         be outstanding for the entire first quarter of fiscal 1996. Subsequent
         to the initial public offering, the shares were actually outstanding
         and are therefore included in the "average shares outstanding"
         calculation above.


                                       16
# C_2022258EN.01000401.xml

| 5.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/4

---

Special report 14/2022:

“The Commission’s response to fraud in the Common Agricultural Policy – Time to dig deeper”

(2022/C 258/04)

The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 14/2022: “The Commission’s response to fraud in the Common Agricultural Policy – Time to dig deeper”.

The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=61337

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022008EN.01000401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/4 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10581 – SPIE / STRUKTON SERVICES)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 8/03)

1.

On 22 December 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022008EN.01000401-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | SPIE Nederland B.V. (‘SPIE’, The Netherlands), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Strukton Services B.V. (‘Strukton Services’, The Netherlands), belonging to Strukton Groep N.V. |

SPIE acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Strukton Services.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for SPIE: the provision of multi-technical services in the areas of energy and communications, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Strukton Services: the management and maintenance of buildings in the Netherlands. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022008EN.01000401-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10581 – SPIE / STRUKTON SERVICES

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022008EN.01000401-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022008EN.01000401-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Park Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2002, (the "Report"), I, David A.
Remijas, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                      /s/ David A. Remijas
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name: David A. Remijas
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

                                    Date: November 14, 2002





                                       13
Exhibit 32.2 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICT Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), VincentA. Paccapaniccia, Executive Vice President, Corporate Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
EXHIBIT 21

                              SPARTECH CORPORATION
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


Legal Entity               DBA                         Incorporation or
                                                       Organization

Atlas Alchem Plastics,     Spartech Plastics           Delaware
Inc.

TKM Plastics, LP           Spartech Plastics           Missouri

Franklin-Burlington        Spartech Vy-Cal             Delaware
Plastics, Inc.
                           Spartech Polycom

Alchem Plastics, Inc.      Spartech Plastics           Delaware

Alchem Plastics            Spartech Plastics           Georgia
Corporation

Anjac-Doron Plastics, Inc. Spartech Profiles           California

Spartech Polycom, Inc.     Spartech Polycom            Pennsylvania
                           Spartech Color

Spartech Polycom, S.A.S.   Spartech Polycom            France

PolyTech South, Inc.       Spartech Polycom            Delaware

UVTEC, L.P.                Spartech Polycom            Texas

Spartech Plastics, Inc.    Spartech Plastics           Delaware

Spartech Industries, Inc.  Spartech Industries         Delaware
                           Spartech Profiles

Spartech Canada, Inc.      Spartech Color              New Brunswick
                           Spartech Plastics
                           Spartech Profiles


Alshin Tire Corporation    Spartech Industries         California

Spartech Polycast, Inc.    Spartech Polycast           Delaware

Spartech Townsend, Inc.    Spartech Townsend           Delaware

Spartech Industries        Spartech Marine             Delaware
Florida, Inc.
Spartech de Mexico, S.A.   Spartech Plastics           Mexico
de C.V.                    Spartech Polycom
Polymer Extruded Products, Spartech PEP                New Jersey
Inc.
Spartech SPD, LLC          Spartech Plastics           Delaware
Spartech CMD, LLC          Spartech Polycom            Delaware
Spartech FCD, LLC          Spartech Polycom            Delaware
X-Core, LLC                Spartech Industries         California
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 9, 2017

s0606

Order 

Clerk

June 9, 2017

155172

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 155172

COA: 327905

Wayne CC: 15-001051-AR

TREMEL ANDERSON,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). 

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order 

addressing: (1) the manner in which a magistrate judge may consider the credibility of 

witnesses at a preliminary examination when determining whether to bind over a 

defendant, in light of our instruction that a magistrate should not refuse to bind a 

defendant over when the evidence conflicts or raises reasonable doubt; see People v Yost, 

468 Mich 122, 128 n 8 (2003); and (2) whether the Wayne Circuit Court abused its 

discretion in dismissing the charges in this instance. The parties should not submit mere 

restatements of their application papers.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21307]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 294 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-613, CP2024-621.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21307 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

David Barker, Appellant

No. 06-12-00198-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law 2 of 

Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

CR1102039). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, David Barker, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 17, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,358
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,127
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         130,119
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           130,119
<LOANS>                                         87,870
<ALLOWANCE>                                        500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,656
<DEPOSITS>                                     150,155
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,644
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 229,656
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,715
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,348
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,063
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,093
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,937
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,216
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  32
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,658
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,282
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,184
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   500
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  500
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             62


</TABLE>