alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2784 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2784

To suspend United States assistance to Brazil until such time as Brazil 
 amends its laws to remove the prohibition on extradition of nationals 
                     of Brazil to other countries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2015

 Mr. Ryan of Ohio (for himself and Mr. Johnson of Ohio) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend United States assistance to Brazil until such time as Brazil 
 amends its laws to remove the prohibition on extradition of nationals 
                     of Brazil to other countries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Karl Hoerig Foreign Aid Suspension 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF UNITED STATES ASSISTANCE TO BRAZIL UNTIL BRAZIL 
              AMENDS ITS LAWS TO REMOVE THE PROHIBITION ON EXTRADITION 
              OF NATIONALS OF BRAZIL TO OTHER COUNTRIES.

    (a) Suspension of Assistance.--Notwithstanding any other provision 
of law, no funds made available to any Federal department or agency may 
be used to provide assistance to Brazil until the President determines 
and certifies to Congress that the Government of Brazil has amended its 
laws to remove the prohibition on extradition of nationals of Brazil to 
other countries.
    (b) Waiver.--The President may waive the application of subsection 
(a) on a case-by-case basis if the President determines and certifies 
to Congress that is in the national interests of the United States to 
do so.
    (c) Effective Date.--This Act takes effect on the date of the 
enactment of this Act and applies with respect to funds made available 
to any Federal department or agency for any fiscal year after fiscal 
year 2015.
                                 <all>
```
Abatement Order filed September 3, 2020.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00865

- CV

____________ GREEN VALLEY PLACE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION D/B/A GREEN VALLEY ESTATES, CIA AND JACQUELINE JOHNSON, REGINALD JOHNSON, LINDA WILLIAM, JESSE PATRIC K, KAREN ROBINSON, AND DERRICK REED , Appellant s
V.
DEBRA DE SHAZOR AND JOHNNY DE SHAZOR , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 458th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 17

- DCV

- 243730A



### ABATEMENT ORDER
Appell ee s have filed three unopposed motions to extend time to file their
brief because the parties have settled

. We i ssue the following order

. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s
active docket . The appeal will be reinstat ed on this court’s active docket when theparties file a motion to dismiss the appeal or other dispositive motion. The court

will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by any party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its o wn motion

.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Bou rliot.
#### Ex parte CROCKER.

No. 20390.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 22, 1939.

*496Marvin B. Simpson, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was arrested and held in custody by the Sheriff of Tarrant County, under and by virtue of an extradition warrant issued by the Governor of this State. He applied to the Hon. Willis McGregor, Judge of the Criminal District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, for a writ of habeas corpus, and prayed that upon a hearing thereof, he be discharged. Upon said hearing, he was remanded to the custody of Elmer Lingoj the duly designated agent for the State of California, to return him to said state, from which order he has appealed to this court.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. Procedural matters appear to be in due order, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of China RuiTai International Holdings Co, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Dian Min Ma, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  April 15, 2010 /s/Dian Min Ma     Chief Executive Officer
# CI2022087EN.01000101.xml

| 23.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 87/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 87/1

---

Notice to importers

Imports of products into the Union under the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement from the non-government controlled areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk oblasts of Ukraine

(2022/C 87 I/01)

The European Commission informs importers that the necessary conditions for the customs authorities of Ukraine to effectively manage and control the preferential tariff treatment provided under the Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part are not in place for goods produced in or exported from the non-government controlled areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk oblasts of Ukraine.

In the absence of the possibility by the customs authorities of Ukraine to apply the relevant provisions of the Agreement to guarantee that goods from those areas are entitled to preferential tariff treatment and to verify that they comply with all the necessary requirements, as provided for notably under Article 33 of Protocol 1 of the Association Agreement, the conditions for such goods to benefit from the preferential tariff treatment are not met.

Therefore, operators of the European Union are advised not to claim preferential treatment for the import into the Union of all goods produced in or exported from the non-government controlled areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk oblasts of Ukraine, since the release of these goods for free circulation gives rise to a customs debt as from date of publication of this notice.

---
II 

Calendar No. 491 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2928 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 19, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

MAY 25, 2016 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 201 B Street in Perryville, Arkansas, as the 

‘‘Harold George Bennett Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HAROLD GEORGE BENNETT POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 201 B Street in Perryville, Ar6 kansas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Harold 

7 George Bennett Post Office’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2928 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Harold George Ben5 nett Post Office’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 491 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2928 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice’’. Arkansas, as the ‘‘Harold George Bennett Post al Service located at 201 B Street in Perryville, 

MAY 25, 2016 

Reported without amendment 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### MORGAN v. WERTZ et al.

No. 3516.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

April 8, 1937.

R. R. Mullen and R. R. Mullen, Jr., both of Alice, for appellant.

Lloyd & Lloyd, of Alice, and Karl Strieber, of San Antonio, for appellees.

HIGGINS, Justice.

This is a suit by appellant to recover 105 acrés of land peaceable possession of which he had held for thirteen years preceding the institution of this suit, continuously using and enjoying same. He claimed title under the ten years’ statute of limitations (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 5510).

Upon an instructed verdict judgment was rendered for defendants.

The plaintiff testified:

> “Q. Did you know who owned it then? A. No, Mr. Smythe fixed up the fence and Mr. Smythe told me to make use of it until I could find out who owned it. I never could find out who owned it.

> “Q. Now you say you didn’t know who owned it, or whether it was owned privately? A. No, or I would have made some sort of agreement with them.

> “Q. And you had that in mind all along? A. Yes, but I never could find that anybody owned it. * * *

> “Q. And you had that in mind up until this suit was filed, that you were willing to buy it if you could find who the owner was? A. Yes sir.

> “Q. And you looked for the owner of the land with a view to buying it? A. I asked several people and nobody didn’t know nothing about it.

> “Q. But you were willing to pay for it if you could locate the owner? A. Yes sir. * * *

> “Q. But you did want to buy it until the time the^ suit was filed, didn’t you? A. I might have made some other agreement. I might have leased it.”

This shows the plaintiff’s possession was in recognition of and in subordination to the true owner. His possession therefore was not hostile and not adverse. Nowhere in his testimony does plaintiff modify or contradict his admissions in the testimony quoted.

The verdict was properly instructed. Mhoon v. Cain, *77*Tex. 316, 14 S.W. 24; Thompson v. Moor (Tex.Com.App.) 14 S.W. (2d) 803.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 296 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-616, CP2024-624.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21309 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                      $2,426,929              $2,723,443
<SECURITIES>                                        $0                      $0
<RECEIVABLES>                               $1,507,965              $1,132,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                        $0                      $0
<INVENTORY>                                 $4,039,846              $4,105,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $8,579,613              $8,635,863
<PP&E>                                     $17,577,713             $16,771,772
<DEPRECIATION>                             $12,145,174             $11,514,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             $14,624,888             $14,422,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       $3,688,136              $3,766,906
<BONDS>                                     $3,467,911              $3,862,560
<COMMON>                                      $174,816                $174,816
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               $0                      $0
<PREFERRED>                                         $0                      $0
<OTHER-SE>                                  $7,718,051              $6,921,695
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               $14,624,888             $14,422,021
<SALES>                                    $20,377,066             $20,013,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           $20,561,845             $20,162,105
<CGS>                                      $13,735,235             $13,309,577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              $13,759,410             $13,354,022
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              $758,286                $798,918
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    $0                      $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            $669,468                $736,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             $1,380,303              $1,156,397
<INCOME-TAX>                                  $531,993                $433,268
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           $848,310                $723,129
<DISCONTINUED>                                      $0                      $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     $0                      $0
<CHANGES>                                           $0                      $0
<NET-INCOME>                                  $848,310                $723,129
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.63                   $1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.63                   $1.39
        

</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HAI YAN ZHANG,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71453

Agency No. A075-123-763

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Hai Yan Zhang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision ordering her removed. We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of due process violations. 

FILED

MAR 15 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-71453

Ibarra-Flores v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 614, 620 (9th Cir. 2006). We grant the

petition for review and remand.

The BIA may violate an alien’s due process rights on appeal if it fails to

consider relevant evidence. See Larita-Martinez v. INS, 220 F.3d 1092, 1095 (9th

Cir. 2000). The record does not reflect that the BIA or IJ considered evidence

submitted by Zhang that her U.S. citizen children would suffer hardship if she were

removed to China because, as U.S. citizens, they would not be able to legally

reside in China with her without regularly obtaining visas. Moreover, Zhang has

established prejudice because consideration of this evidence may have affected the

outcome of the proceedings. See Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 972 (9th Cir.

2000). We therefore remand to allow the BIA to consider this evidence.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
Exhibit 32.1 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of BarPoint.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JeffreyW. Sass, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: November 13, 2003
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Zones, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Firoz H. Lalji, Chairman and
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      August 11, 2006








/S/     
                FIROZ H LALJIFiroz
                H. LaljiChairman
                and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2919 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2919

   To authorize 2 additional district judgeships for the district of 
                               Colorado.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2015

Ms. DeGette (for herself, Mr. Coffman, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Perlmutter, Mr. 
    Polis, and Mr. Tipton) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize 2 additional district judgeships for the district of 
                               Colorado.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGESHIPS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.

    (a) Additional District Judgeships.--The President shall appoint, 
by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 2 additional district 
judges for the district of Colorado.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--In order that the table 
contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, will 
reflect the change in the number of judgeships authorized by subsection 
(a), the item relating to Colorado in such table is amended by striking 
``7'' and inserting ``9''.
                                 <all>
```
|Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby
certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. (the Company),
for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | o | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | o | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                                                    | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date:  May 13, 2004                                                 | 
|/s/ Michael J. Gaughan                                              | 
|Michael J. Gaughan
Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer | 
|/s/ Gage Parrish                                                    | 
|Gage Parrish
Vice President andChief Financial Officer              | 

|A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. and will be
retained by Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------