alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2594 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2594

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the exclusion of 
gain or loss from the sale or exchange of certain brownfield sites from 
     unrelated business taxable income, and to extend expensing of 
                    environmental remediation costs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2018

  Mr. Murphy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the exclusion of 
gain or loss from the sale or exchange of certain brownfield sites from 
     unrelated business taxable income, and to extend expensing of 
                    environmental remediation costs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Creating Livable Environments And 
New Usable Property Act'' or the ``CLEAN UP Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION OF GAIN OR LOSS ON SALE OR EXCHANGE OF 
              CERTAIN BROWNFIELD SITES FROM UNRELATED BUSINESS TAXABLE 
              INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Section 512(b)(19)(K) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``December 31, 2009'' and inserting 
``December 31, 2019''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to any gain or loss on the sale, exchange, or other disposition of any 
property acquired by the taxpayer after December 31, 2017.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF EXPENSING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION COSTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 198(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``December 31, 2011'' and inserting 
``December 31, 2019''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to expenditures paid or incurred after December 31, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
# envoy February 23, 2016 Federal Aviation Administration Attn: U.S. Department ofTransportation Dockets 400 7th Street, SW, Plaza 401 Washington, DC 20590 Re: Exemption No. 7252G EnvoyAir Inc., Certificate No. SIMA586A requests an extension to Exemption 7252G from 14 CFR 121.434(c)(1)(ii), which expires on June 30, 2016. All conditions and limitationswill remain the same. Sincerely, Captain Edwin Korzun Managerof Flight Standards EnvoyAir Inc. Cc: Benoit Lefargue

EnvoyAir Inc. • 4301 Regent Blvd• MD 311 EHQ •Irving, TX 75063
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 292 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-611, CP2024-619.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21305 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                   Exhibit 12

COMPUTATION OF TOTAL DEBT TO TOTAL CAPITALIZATION

(Dollars in thousands)
                                                     December 31,
                                              ---------------------------
                                            1995           1994           1993
                                            ----           ----           ----

Short-term debt .................     $   66,600         49,300         82,700
Current portion of long-term debt         16,800         25,300         17,200
Long-term debt ..................        613,100        622,300        547,300
                                      ----------      ---------      ---------
Total debt ......................        696,500        696,900        647,200
Minority interest in subsidiaries         73,300         65,300         62,200
Common shareholders' equity .....      2,677,700      2,187,600      2,022,100
                                      ----------      ---------      ---------
Total capitalization ............     $3,447,500      2,949,800      2,731,500
                                      ==========      =========      =========

Ratio of total debt to total
 capitalization .................           20.2%          23.6%          23.7%
                                      ==========      =========      =========
FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Exhibit 23.1 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED  PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

 

 

             We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-55687  of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation on Form S-8 of our report dated  January 25, 2002, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Commonwealth  Financial Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2001.

/S/Deloitte & Touche LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania  March 26, 2002

80
# C_2022427EN.01000801.xml

| 9.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/8

---

CLEAN HYDROGEN JOINT UNDERTAKING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2021

(2022/C 427/08)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.clean-hydrogen.europa.eu/about-us/key-documents/budget-and-annual-accounts-0_en

---
EXHIBIT 10.5 




SCHEDULE OF RESTRICTED UNIT AGREEMENTS

dated October 28, 2004 



The following have executed
Restricted Unit Agreements substantially in the form of the agreement attached as
Exhibit 10.4 (the “Exhibit”) to the Valero L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2004. 




Curtis V. Anastasio

Steven A. Blank

James R. Bluntzer 

Rodney L. Reese

Jerry D. McVicker 



The following information sets forth
the material details in which the Restricted Unit Agreements described in this Schedule
differ from the Exhibit. 



	Named Executive Officer	Number of Restricted Units
	Curtis V. Anastasio	 	 	3,850	 	 
	Steven A. Blank	 	 	2,750	 	 
	James R. Bluntzer	 	 	  990	 	 
	Rodney L. Reese	 	 	  960	 	 
	Jerry McVicker	 	 	  875
# C_2022129EN.01001301.xml

| 22.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/13

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10512 – LEAR CORPORATION / INTERIOR COMFORT SYSTEMS BUSINESS OF KONGSBERG AUTOMOTIVE GROUP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 129/04)

On 24 February 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10512. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10512. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, ThomasLiguori, certify that:

 

1.                     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Channell Commercial Corporation;

 

2.                     Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                     Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.                     The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.                     The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  November 4, 2003 |   | By:    | /s/  Thomas Liguori |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |   | Thomas  Liguori          |
|                         |   |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.39    
    


Qwest Services Corp.
  1801 California Street, Suite 5200

Denver, Colorado 80202-2651

Phone 303 9922-5943

Jill.sanford@qwest.com 


Jill Sanford

Chief Human Resources Officer 


August 19, 2004 


Ms. Paula
Kruger

1801 California St., #5200

Denver, CO 80202 



	Re:
	Relocation
expenses 




Dear
Paula: 


        Your
offer letter, dated August 20, 2003, provided that the Company would relocate you and your family under the Tier 1 relocation policy for executives. Because you have
not yet purchased a home in Denver, the Company paid temporary living expenses for you totaling approximately $75,000 between
August 20, 2003 and July 2, 2004. We agreed that it is in the best interests of both you and the Company to end the existing arrangement and therefore we agreed: 



	1.
	The
Company will pay you a lump sum of $25,000 (which will be grossed up as set forth in the Tier 1 relocation policy) in complete satisfaction of any remaining obligations under the
Tier 1 relocation policy except that if you do purchase a home in Denver while you are employed by Qwest, the Company will pay the reasonable and customary closing costs associated with the purchase
of your new home. The types of closing costs that will be reimbursed are set forth at pages 24-25 of the Tier 1 relocation policy.



	2.
	The
Company will cease paying any temporary living or commuting expenses as of July 1, 2004. 




        If
you agree to this modification to your offer letter, please indicate by signing below. 













Yours
very truly, 


/s/
Jill Sanford 


Jill
Sanford 














Agreed
this 19th day of August, 2004: 



	

/s/  PAULA KRUGER      
 Paula Kruger	

 	

 	

 





cc.        Jana
Venus 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.39
#### Saunders Mills, Inc., Appellant, *v.*Evatt, Tax Commr., Appellee.

(No. 28837

Decided January 28, 1942.)

*Mr. Edwin 8. Barger,*for appellant.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. A. A. Cartwright,*for appellee.

Zimmerman, J.

This matter is ibefore the court on an appeal from an order of the Board of Tax Appeals affirming a sales tax assessment made by the state Tax Commissioner against the appellant in connection with its purchase of four motor trucks at Toledo, Ohio.

Appellant is engaged in the manufacture and sale of alfalfa meal. In pursuit of that business it procures alfalfa hay from leased lands, and the trucks in question are used solely in the seasonal occupation of hauling such hay from the fields to appellant’s four dehydrating plants in northwestern Ohio.

Section 5546-2, General Code, a part of the Ohio *228Sales Tax Act, provides that for stated purposes an excise tax in given amounts shall be levied on each retail sale made in Ohio of tangible personal property, with certain exceptions.

Exempted from the tax by virtue of Section 5546-1, General Code, are articles to be used by the consumer directly in the production of tangible personal property for sale by manufacturing, processing or farming.

It is the contention of the appellant that ‘ ‘ The motor trucks involved herein are used in farming and they are used directly in the production of tangible personal property for sale by manufacturing or processing. *’*’

Both the Tax Commissioner and the Board of Tax Appeals took the view that the trucks were subject to the excise tax imposed by law, since they were used exclusively in *transporting*the alfalfa hay from the fields to the dehydrating plants, over the public roads, and were not engaged in actually sowing, drilling, cultivating or harvesting the hay or in converting it into a manufactured product, so as to bring them within the meaning of the words of exemption contained in Section 5546-1, General Code.

We are in accord with such determination, and, finding the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals neither unreasonable nor unlawful upon the facts, affirm the same.

*Decision affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Bettman, J., not participating.
Exhibit 32.6



Statement of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Enterprises (the "Company") certifies that:



(i)

the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







February 24, 2009



/S/  Robert M. SchlaxRobert M. SchlaxChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2924 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2924

  To withdraw certain Federal lands and interests located in Pima and 
Santa Cruz counties, Arizona, from the mining and mineral leasing laws 
             of the United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2015

 Mr. Grijalva introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To withdraw certain Federal lands and interests located in Pima and 
Santa Cruz counties, Arizona, from the mining and mineral leasing laws 
             of the United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Southern Arizona Public Lands 
Protection Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF FEDERAL LANDS AND INTERESTS LOCATED IN PIMA AND 
              SANTA CRUZ COUNTIES, ARIZONA.

    Subject to valid existing rights, after the date of enactment of 
this Act--
            (1) all federally owned interests in National Forest lands 
        in Santa Cruz County and Pima County, Arizona, are withdrawn 
        from--
                    (A) all forms of entry, appropriation, and disposal 
                under the public land laws;
                    (B) location, entry, and patent under the mining 
                laws; and
                    (C) operation of the mineral leasing and geothermal 
                leasing laws, and the mineral materials laws;
            (2) all federally owned subsurface interests under the 
        administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management in 
        lands in Pima County, Arizona, with respect to which the 
        surface interests are owned by such county, including in such 
        lands located in Davidson Canyon, are withdrawn from--
                    (A) all forms of entry, appropriation and disposal 
                under the public land laws;
                    (B) location, entry, and patent under the mining 
                laws; and
                    (C) operation of the mineral leasing and geothermal 
                leasing laws, and the mineral materials laws; and
            (3) all federally owned interests in Bureau of Land 
        Management lands in Pima County, Arizona, are withdrawn from 
        entry, location, or patent under the general mining laws.
                                 <all>
```
The Honorable Donald E. O & Brien, United States District Judge for the Nor thern 1 District of Iowa. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-2340

___________ Allen Langley, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. State of Iowa, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: September 23, 1997 Filed: October 8, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Allen Langley, an Iowa prisoner, appeals the district court & s grant of summary 1 ju dgment against him in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action. Langley challenges the district court & s determination that there exists no cause to excuse his procedural default
. Specifi cally, Langley claims that he mailed his habeas petition--which he labeled a “Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 For Writ of Habeas Corpus By a Person in State-2-

Custody, United States District Court”--to the state court, that the state court mailed it to the federal district court ra ther than filing it as a state post-conviction motion, and that the state court & s conduct should excuse his procedural default. After de novo review of the record, we agree that Langley & s claims are barred fromh abeas review absent a showing of cause and prejudice or a fundamenta l miscarriage of jus tice. See Lamp v. Iowa , No. 96-2946, slip op. at 5-7 (8th Cir. Aug. 13, 1997). Although su fficient interference by the State may constitute cause in some circumstances, see Joubert v. Hopkins , 75 F.3d 1232, 1242 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 2574 (1996), we conclude this case does not present such a circumstance. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of BarPoint.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending Setember 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey W. Sass, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
November 14, 2002





/s/    Jeffrey W. SassJeffrey W. Sass Chief Executive Officer