alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY NINETOWNS DIGITAL WORLD TRADE HOLDINGS
LIMITED. THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN REDACTED. REDACTED MATERIAL IS MARKED WITH "*"
AND HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT

                         OF THE DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT

      CONCERNING THE DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT OF "iDECLARE.CIQ" ENTERPRISE
SOFTWARE MADE BY BEIJING NINETOWNS PORTS SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. WITH
ITS DISTRIBUTOR, SINCE THE CONTENTS OF PART OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE ORIGINAL
DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT DID NOT CORRESPOND TO THE ORIGINAL INTENTION, THIS
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS HEREBY MADE IN ORDER TO SPECIFY THE ORIGINAL INTENTION
OF THE DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT.

PARTY A:    BEIJING NINETOWNS PORTS SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

ADDRESS:    5TH FLOOR, UNION PLAZA, 20 CHAOWAI STREET, CHAOYANG DISTRICT,
            BEIJING 100020, THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

ZIP CODE:   100020                    TELEPHONE:                    010-65887788

PARTY B:    GUANGZHOU PANYU CHENGCHANG TRADE DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.

ADDRESS:    21ST FLOOR, FRIENDSHIP CENTRE, NO. 1 FANHUA ROAD, SHIQIAO, PANYU
            DISTRICT

            GUANGZHOU

ZIP CODE:   511400                    TELEPHONE:                    020-84818122

1.          PRODUCT SETTLEMENT PRICE

            THE SPECIFIC SETTLEMENT PRICE IS AS FOLLOWS:

THE FIXED SELLING PRICE OF PARTY A'S PRODUCTS (INCLUDING SOFTWARE ONLY) TO PARTY
B IS *********, WHICH DOES NOT INCLUDE THE SOFTWARE FEE AND SERVICE FEE AS
DESCRIBED IN THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT.

THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TAKES EFFECT AFTER BEING SIGNED AND SEALED BY BOTH
PARTIES.

PARTY A: BEIJING NINETOWNS PORTS SOFTWARE   PARTY B: GUANGZHOU PANYU CHENGCHANG
         AND TECHNOLOGY  CO., LTD.                   TRADE DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.
         [SEAL]                                      [SEAL]

PARTY A'S REPRESENTATIVE (SEAL):      PARTY B'S REPRESENTATIVE (SEAL):

DATE: APRIL 22, 2004                  DATE: APRIL 22, 2004

                                        1
```

[Federal Register: March 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 49)]
[Notices]               
[Page 12217]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15mr10-35]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers

 
Notice of Availability for Comments Regarding the Planned 
Environmental Assessment Interim Report IIIa Fish Deterrent Barriers, 
Illinois and Chicago Area Waterways

AGENCY: Department of the Army--U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District is 
requesting public comments for a planned Environmental Assessment. The 
Corps is directed to conduct a study of technologies that may enhance 
the efficacy of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal Dispersal Barriers 
System. The study is structured as a series of interim reports. Interim 
Report IIIa, limited to the impacts of implementing additional in-
stream barrier/deterrent technologies at key locations in the Illinois 
and Chicago Area Waterways is the focus of this planned EA. The 
specific technologies under consideration include acoustic deterrents, 
air bubble curtains, and strobe lights used both individually and in 
combination. Comments are requested to assist in determining the level 
of analysis and impacts to be considered for implementing these in-
stream barrier/deterrent technologies. Any comments received by the 
Corps on the proposed EA will be considered fully for the Federal 
action associated with the Project.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Comments concerning the level of 
analysis or impacts to be considered in the draft Environmental 
Assessment should be provided by March 19, 2010, to Peter Bullock at 
the Chicago District at peter.y.bullock@usace.army.mil.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Susanne J. Davis,
Chief, Planning Branch, Chicago District.
[FR Doc. 2010-5619 Filed 3-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 11, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 73568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20701]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1


Income Taxes

CFR Correction

    This rule is being published by the Office of the Federal Register 
to correct an editorial or technical error that appeared in the most 
recent annual revision of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    In Title 26 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1 (Sec. Sec.  
1.410 to 1.440), revised as of April 1, 2024, in section 1.430(h)(2)-1, 
remove paragraph (ii) immediately following paragraph (b)(2).

[FR Doc. 2024-20701 Filed 9-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0099-10-P
**Exhibit 31.2302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICEROF ALTERRA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION**I, Mark W. Ohlendorf, certify that:1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alterra Healthcare Corporation;2.     	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3.     	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:(a)      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;(b)      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and(c)      presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):(a)     all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and(b)      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and6.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.Date:  November 14, 2003  /s/ Mark W. Ohlendorf                        Mark W. Ohlendorf,President, Chief Financial Officerand Secretary
Exhibit 32
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of FBL Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James E. Hohmann, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, James P. Brannen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1
                  )
                  
                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and(2
                  )
                  
                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: May 5, 2010
  By
                  /s/ James E. HohmannJames E. HohmannChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
 By
                  /s/ James P. BrannenJames P. BrannenChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to FBL Financial Group, Inc., and will be retained by FBL Financial Group, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2022166EN.01000701.xml

| 20.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/7

---

Notice to importers

Imports of open mesh fabrics of glass fibres into the European Union from GSP beneficiary countries belonging to the regional cumulation group I and group III

(2022/C 166/05)

By a notice to importers published in the Official Journal C 314 of 23 September 2015, p. 11, the Commission advised European Union operators declaring origin / presenting documentary evidence of origin in order to benefit from preferential treatment for open mesh fabrics of glass fibres of HS subheadings 7019 40, 7019 51 and 7019 59 imported from EU Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) beneficiary countries belonging to the regional cumulation group I and group III (1) to take all necessary precautions, as there were reasonable doubts concerning the proper application of the preferential treatment and the applicability of proofs of origin presented in the Union for those products. The release of those products for free circulation could thus give rise to a customs debt, and lead to fraud against the European Union’s financial interests.

Based on the information available, the reasonable doubts mentioned above are no longer supported by any evidence that would show that the underlying risks continue to persist.

In addition, since 1 January 2021 all exporters from the GSP beneficiary countries exporting under GSP have been applying the REX self-certification system (2) and hence issuing statements on origin as the only documentary evidence to claim preferential origin. Form A certificates of origin may no longer be issued by the governmental authorities of the GSP beneficiary countries.

The notice to importers published in the Official Journal C 314 of 23 September 2015 has therefore become devoid of purpose as regards consignments of the products concerned declared for release for free circulation on or after the date of the publication of this notice, and is hereby withdrawn.

---

(1)  At the time of the publication of this notice, the following beneficiary countries belonged to the groups:

| — | Group I – Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Philippines, Vietnam, Myanmar/Burma |
| --- | --- |

—

Group I – Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Philippines, Vietnam, Myanmar/Burma

| — | Group III – Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka |
| --- | --- |

—

Group III – Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka

(2)  Articles 80 and 81 of the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 of 24 November 2015 laying down detailed rules for implementing certain provisions of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ L 343, 29.12.2015, p. 558).

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 21


SUBSIDIARIES OF MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.


|                                                                  |  |                  |         |              |        |  |      |          |  |  |       | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ------- | ------------ | ------ |  | ---- | -------- |  |  | ----- | 
|                                                                  |  |                  |         | Shareholding |       
|                                                                  |  |                  |         | at Year End  |       
|                                                                  |  | Jurisdiction     |         |              |        | 
|Name of Subsidiary(1)                                             |  | of Incorporation |         |              | Direct |  |      | Indirect | 
|                                                                  |  |                  |         |              |        |  |      |          | 
|Dresden Papier GmbH                                               |  |                  | Germany |              |        |  |     |          |  |  | 100%  | 
|Zellstoff-und Papierfabrik Rosenthal GmbH & Co. KG                |  |                  | Germany |              |        |  |     |          |  |  | 100%  | 
|Zellstoff Stendal GmbH                                            |  |                  | Germany |              |        |  |     |          |  |  | 63.6% | 
|Zellstoff Celgar Limited(2) (formerly known as 0706906 B.C. Ltd.) |  |                  | Canada  |              |        |  | 100% |          |  |  |      | 






|    |                                                                        
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | All the subsidiaries are conducting business under their own
    names.
|   
|(2) | Acquisition vehicle that acquired the Celgar mill in February
    2005.

122
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 23.01
                              
                              
                              
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 
2-96782, 33-26357, 2-66833, 2-96781, 33-21908 and 33-54055 of Pacific 
Enterprises on Forms S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-24830 and 
33-44338 of Pacific Enterprises on Forms S-3 of our reports dated January 27, 
1998, appearing in and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on 
Form 10-K of Pacific Enterprises for the year ended December 31, 1997.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 23, 1998
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 305 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-629, CP2024-638.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21336 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
FILED

June 10, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

DECEMBER SESSION, 1996

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

) No. 03C01-9602-CC-00066

Appellee )

) McMINN COUNTY

vs. )

) Hon. R. STEVEN BEBB, Judge

GUSSIE WILLIS VANN, )

) (Felony Murder - Death Penalty;

Appellant ) Incest)

SEPARATE CONCURRING

I concur in the result reached by the majority in affirming all convictions

and the appellant's sentence of death. I write separately only to address the

issue of whether the indictment for incest is fatally defective for failing to include

the requisite mens rea. I agree that the indictment is valid, but for reasons other

than those articulated by the majority. The majority relies upon State v. Marshall,

870 S.W.2d 532, 537 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1993). In Marshall, this court held that

the mens rea is an essential element of an offense and, therefore, must be

included in the indictment. Id. at 537. This court further held that, if the mens

rea is implicit in the allegations contained in the indictment, the indictment is

adequate. Id. at 538. The majority applies this rationale, concluding that the

mental state of "knowingly" is "necessarily implied by the allegations in the

indictment." 

However, as noted by the majority, the legislature did not include the

requisite mental state in the definition of the offense of incest, permitting the

application of any one of three mental states set forth in Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-

11-301(c). I would simply adhere to this court's position in State v. Dison, No.

03C01-9602-CC-00051 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Knoxville, Jan. 31, 1997), in which

we held that, under these circumstances, the accused's culpable mental state is
2

not an essential element of the offense and need not be alleged in the

indictment.

____________________________________

DAVID G. HAYES, Judge
#### JANUARY v. STATE.

No. 15560.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 19, 1932.

Earl M. Greer, of Wills Point, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*469HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for manufacturing intoxicating liquor; punishment being one year in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are found in the record. The indictment appears regular on its face. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed;
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. JE S U S V A S Q U E Z , S r. , a. k. a. C hu y, a. k. a. Se a l C, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 12- 50108 D. C . No . 8 : 0 6 - c r - 0 0 2 4 7 - DO C ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia D a vi d O . C a rt e r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d June 18, 2013 ** B efo re: T A L L M A N , M . S M IT H , an dH U R W IT Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J e s us V a s que z , S r . , appe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s or de rde ny i ng hi s 18 U . S . C . § 3 58 2(c) (2) m ot i on for r educt i on of se nt ence . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED JU N 21 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 50108 2 V a s que z c ont e nds tha the i s e nt i t l e d t o as e nt e nc e r e duc t i on ba s e d on the F a i rS e nt e nc i ng A c tof

2010 ( “ F S A ” ) a nd s ubs e que nta m e ndm e nt s t o the S e nt e nc i ng G ui de l i ne s tha tl ow e r e d the G ui de l i ne s r ange s f orc r a c k c oc a i ne o ffen ses. W e rev i ew d e n o v o w h eth er th e d i stri ctco u rth adau th o ri ty t o m o d i fy a d e f e n d a n t’s s e n te n c e u n d e rs e c tio n 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) . Se e U n ite d Sta tes v . A u s tin , 676 F . 3d 92 4, 92 6 (9th C i r. 20 12 ). V a s que z ’ s 120- m onth s e nt e nc e w a s the s t a tut orym anda t orym i ni m um a tthe tim e o f s e n te n c in g . See 2 1 U .S .C . § 8 4 1 (b )( 1 )( A ) ( 2 0 0 8 ). B ec au se th e F S A ’s r e du c e dm a n d a to rym in im u m s d o n o t ap p lyto d e f e n d an ts s e n te n c e db e f

o r e its e f f e c t i ve da t e , ar e duc t i on i n V a s que z ’ s s e nt e nc e w oul d notbe c ons i s t e ntw i th the po l i cyst at em ent s i ss ued b y the S ent enci ng C om m i ss i on , and the di stri ctcourt p r o p e r lyd e n ie dV a s q u e z ’s m o tio n . See 18 U . S . C . § 3582( c ) ( 2) ; U . S . S . G . § 1B 1. 10 c m t. n .1 ( A ) ; U

ni te d States v . A ugus t i ne , 71 2 F . 3d 12 90 , 12 95 (9th C i r. 20 13 ). AF F I RME D.
```

CONFIRMING STATEMENT

    This statement confirms that the undersigned, Kimberly J. Ellington, has authorized and designated, Jennifer Mainord, Amanda C. Williams or Rhonda Bost, to execute and file on the undersignedTMs behalf, all Form 3, 4, and 5 (including amendments thereto) that the undersigned may be required to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a result of the undersignedTMs ownership of or transactions in securities of First Merchants Corporation.  The authority of Jennifer Mainord, Amanda C. Williams or Rhonda Bost under this statement shall continue until the undersigned is no longer required to file Form 3, 4, and 5 with regard to the undersigned ownership or transactions in securities of First Merchants Corporation, unless earlier revoked in writing.  The undersigned acknowledges Jennifer Mainord, Amanda C. Williams or Rhonda Bost are not assuming any of the undersignedTMs responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                        __/s/ Kimberly J. Ellington______
                        Kimberly J. Ellington

Date: February 13, 2014
```