alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7281

DONNIE WAYNE CLARK, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus D. CAMPBELL, Correctional Officer, Mailroom Supervisor, individually and in his officialcapacity; A.G. LEA, Sgt./Institution Investigator, individually and in his official capacity; E. E. COLEMAN, JR., Clerk of Court, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-93-3) Submitted: June 8, 1999 Decided: June 18, 1999 Before LUTTIG and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donnie Wayne Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Donnie Wayne Clark appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. The district court’s dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers’ Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). A dismissal without prejudice is a final order only if “‘no amendment [in the complaint] could cure the defects in the plaintiff’s case.’” Id. at 1067 (quoting Coniston Corp. v. Village of Hoffman Estates , 844F.2d 461, 463 (7th Cir. 1988)). In ascertaining whether a dismissal without prejudice is reviewable in this court, the court must determine “whether the plaintiff could save his action by merely amending his complaint.” Domino Sugar , 10 F.3d at 1066-67. In this case, Appellant may move in the district court to reopen his case and to file an amended complaint specifically alleging facts sufficient to state a claim under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983. Therefore, the dismissal order is not appealable. Accordingly, wedismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. In light of this disposition, we deny Clark’s motion for a court order to address the payment of the installments on his filing fee. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
# C_2022335EN.01000301.xml

| 2.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/3

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1447, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1446 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2022/C 335/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1447 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1446 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons should be included in the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for the designation of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address before 2 November 2022:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 227 I, 1.9.2022, p. 4.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(4)  OJ L 227 I, 1.9.2022, p. 1.

---
#### WOODWARD v. STATE.

No. 19684.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 12, 1938.

Fred Erisman, of Longview, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for robbery, punishment assessed at thirty-five years in the penitentiary.

The court is advised by proper affidavits that pending the appeal appellant has died. The appeal is therefore abated.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jimmy S.H. Lee, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Mercer International
Inc., certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report as amended on Form 10-K/A of
Mercer International Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the


<PAGE>

audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

         Date: December 23, 2003

         /s/ Jimmy S.H. Lee
         ---------------------------
         Jimmy S.H. Lee
         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2022009EN.01000101.xml

| 10.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10527 – INSIGHT / VECTOR CAPITAL / IRIS HOLDINGS JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 9/01)

On 9 December 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10527. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10527. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0238

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH BRIAN MCELROY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 24, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 17 2023

04/17/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0238
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Note:  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001029390
<NAME>  Professional Recoveries Inc
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                       538
<INVENTORY>                                     42,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,205
<PP&E>                                          44,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,699
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,683
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# Federal Register CITATION NOTICE OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

89 FR 75540.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

Thursday, September 19, 2024 at 10:00 a.m.

*Hybrid Meeting:*                         1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC (12th Floor) and Virtual.                    

# CHANGE IN THE MEETING:

*The following item was also discussed:*

Proposed Referral of Questions on Dependent Care to Regulations Committee

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220. 

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Laura E. Sinram,

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2024-21846 Filed 9-19-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6044** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ADRIAN LYNDELL COOK , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News
. Robert G. Doumar , Senior District Judge. ( 4:08

- cr - 00029

- RGD

- FBS

- 1 )

Submitted : May 21, 2015 Decided: May 26, 2015

Before MOTZ , KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Adrian Lyndell Cook , Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United S tates Attorney , Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Adrian Lyndell Cook appeals the d istrict court’s order denying what it construed as motions for appointment of counsel and for a sentence reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) ( 2012 ). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reason s stated by the district court
. United States v. Cook , No. 4:08

- cr - 00029

- RGD

FBS

- 1 ( E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2014 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument w ould not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
From: Sherri Comerford/DC/USEPA/US 

To: Navin Shekar/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 07/05/2012 10:10 AM 

Subject: Audio files for docket 

Attached please find a zip file containing four Windows Media Player audio files from last Friday's public 

meeting on the draft guidance. Following is the title, date, and location of the meeting and running time 

and speaker list for each audio file. 

"Public Meeting on Draft Permitting Guidance for Oil and Gas Hydraulic Fracturing Activities Using Diesel 

Fuels," Friday, June 29, 2012, 8:30 a.m. -12:00 p.m. and 1:30-5:00 p.m., 1153 EPA East, 1201 

Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. 

Morning Session:

 Audio File # 1 of 4, Running Time: 54:00 min. Speakers: Patrick Field, Consensus Building Institute 

(Moderator); Ronald Bergman, Chief, Prevention Branch, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, 

EPA; Ben Norris, American Petroleum Institute; Adam Carpenter, American Water Works 

Association; Andrew Yates, Osage Tribe; Lynn Thrope, Clean Water Action; Victor Ciuccio; Aaron 

Mintzes, Earth Works Action; Lisa Rokoff, Sierra Club; Deborah Thomas, Powder River Basin 

Resource Council 

 Audio File # 2 of 4, Running Time: 10:20 min. Speakers: Hugh MacMillan, Food & Water Watch; 

Rachel Jones, Law Student, University of Tulsa 

Afternoon Session:

 Audio File # 3 of 4, Running Time: 18.48 min. Speakers: Patrick Field, Consensus Building Institute 

(Moderator); Ronald Bergman, Chief, Prevention Branch, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, 

EPA; Madeleine Foote, League of Conservation Voters 

 Audio File # 4 of 4, Running Time: 6 sec. Meeting adjournment announcement. 

******** 

Sherri Comerford 

Environmental Protection Specialist 

EPA/Office of Ground Water & Drinking Water 

(202) 564-4639 

(202) 564-3757 (fax) 

comerford.sherri@epa.gov 

Audio file 6'29'12.zip
**CERTIFICATE**
                      The undersigned does hereby certify that he is the Chief Executive Officer of TIB FinancialCorp. (the “Corporation”), and that the following resolution was duly adopted by the Board ofDirectors at a meeting held on April 26, 2005:
**AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS**
                      BE IT RESOLVED, that Article II, Section 4 of the Bylaws relating to “Classification of Boardand Term” is hereby amended by deleting such text in its entirety and inserting the following inlieu thereof:
     The number of Directors shall be the number from time to time fixed by theshareholders or by the Directors, in accordance with the provisions of the Bylaws ofthe Corporation, but at no time shall the number of directors be fewer than five (5).A majority of the full board of directors may, at any time during the years followingthe annual meeting of shareholders, increase the number of directors by not more thantwo and appoint persons to fill resulting vacancies. The Board of Directors of theCorporation shall be divided into two classes as equal in number as may be feasible,with the term of office of one class expiring each year. At each annual meeting ofshareholders, successors to the directors whose terms shall then expire shall beelected to hold office for the terms expiring at the second succeeding annualmeeting. Directors shall continue in office until the end of their respective termand until his or her successor is elected and qualified or until there is a decreasein the number of directors. In the case of any vacancies, by reason of an increase inthe number of directors or otherwise, it shall be filled by the affirmative vote of amajority of the remaining directors, though less than a quorum of the Board ofDirectors, and each additional director shall hold office until the next annualmeeting of shareholders and until his successor shall have been elected andqualified. When the number of directors has changed, any newly created directorshipsor any decrease in directorships shall be so assigned among the classes by a majorityof the directors then in office, no less than a quorum, as to make all classes asequal in number as may be feasible. No decrease in the number of directors shallshorten the term of an incumbent director.
                      I further certify that the foregoing resolution is in full force and effect and has not beenamended or rescinded as of the date hereof.
                      In Witness Whereof, I have signed this Certificate for and on behalf of the Corporation this26th day of April 2005.
/s/ Edward V. Lett
### Synergy	UAS	Inc .	Petition	for	Exemption 1 Statement of Public Interest

Section 333 of Public Law 112

− 95 in reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704

This comment is submitted in response to July 28 Letter requesting additional information about how the proposed UAS petition is in the public interest.

Aerial photography and videography provides geographical information for a variety of applications such as real estate marketing and development, internet and smart phone applications, and utility infrastructure monitoring, all currently obtained through m anned aircraft and orbital satellites. The current method of collecting this type of data is cost prohibitive for the small business owner. Using Synergy UAS services will help reduce the cost which in turn also creates more economic benefits for large bus iness, government agencies, and internet service providers.

The proposed use does not pose a threat to public safety because our aircraft are small in size and made of frangible materials. Furthermore, they do not contain combustible fuel and has signific antly reduced risk of fire and its collateral effects when compared to manned aircraft. Additionally, the aircraft does not produce carbon emissions which helps to mitigate the effects of human contribution to global warming.

Another benefit to the publi c is our proposed exemption will create employment opportunities. We will need pilots, maintenance personnel, photo and video specialists, and management staff. Furthermore, if our pilot certificate exemption is approved, we will be able to immediately hir e experienced people who may be operating without proper authorizations. This has the benefit of mitigating illegal activity as it is perhaps the most pressing concern as expressed by the media, our local FSDO, and the public at large.

Resp ectfully Submitted

,

______________________ Robert Walker, President
Synergy UAS Inc. 1029	Paseo	Entrada
Chula	Vista,	CA	91910 synergyuas@cox.net

619

- 520

- 6718
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 7, 2018 s0228

Order 

Clerk

March 7, 2018

155764

CEDRIC CARTER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 155764

COA: 330573

Ingham CC: 14-001008-CZ

CAPITAL AREA TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 4, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.