alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31434]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2006-0593; FRL-9905-06-Region-6]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Control 
of Air Pollution by Permits for New Construction or Modification; 
Permits for Specific Designated Facilities

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 21, 2013, the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) published a direct final rule and accompanying proposal approving 
portions of two revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
concerning the Permits for Specific Designated Facilities Program, also 
referred to as the FutureGen Program. The direct final action was 
published without prior proposal because EPA anticipated no adverse 
comments. EPA stated in the direct final rule that if we received 
relevant, adverse comments by December 23, 2013, EPA would publish a 
timely withdrawal in the Federal Register. EPA received a letter dated 
December 19, 2013, from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 
stating that the March 9, 2006 and July 2, 2010 SIP revisions specific 
to the FutureGen program have been withdrawn from our consideration as 
revisions to the Texas SIP. Accordingly, EPA is withdrawing our 
proposed approval of the Texas FutureGen program and in a separate 
rulemaking in today's Federal Register we are also withdrawing the 
corresponding direct final approval. We find that no further action is 
necessary on the Texas FutureGen Program March 9, 2006 and July 2, 2010 
SIP revisions. The State's action also withdraws from EPA's review the 
FutureGen Program component of the January 22, 2010 Consent Decree 
between EPA and the BCCA Appeal Group, Texas Association of Business, 
and Texas Oil and Gas Association. This withdrawal is being taken under 
section 110 and parts C and D of the Federal Clean Air Act.

DATES: The proposed rule published on November 21, 2013 (78 FR 69812) 
is withdrawn as of January 6, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Adina Wiley (6PD-R), Air Permits 
Section, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue 
(6PD-R), Suite 1200, Dallas, TX 75202-2733. The telephone number is 
(214) 665-2115. Ms. Wiley can also be reached via electronic mail at 
wiley.adina@epa.gov.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    Dated: December 20, 2013.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2013-31434 Filed 1-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 347 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-674, CP2024-683.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21381 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### F. C. CRANE CO., Appellant, v. Walker WILLIAMS, Appellee.

No. 1741.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

April 9, 1936.

Touchstone, Wight, Gormley & Price, of Dallas, for appellant.

J. B. Keith and J. A. Johnson, both of Stephenville, for appellee.

; GALLAGHER, Chief Justice.

This appeal is prosecuted from an order of the court overruling a plea of privilege. It is a companion case to No. 1739, entitled F. C. Crane Company v. Homer Gosdin (Tex.Civ.App.) 94 S.W.(2d) 221. Appellee was a guest in Gos-din’s car and received serious injuries when it fell through the crushed bridge. The issues of fact and law involved in this cause are the same as in said cause No. 1739. The judgment of' the trial court is therefore ’affirmed.
# C_2022278EN.01000101.xml

| 20.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9286 – SEGRO / PSPIB / WROCLAW SITE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 278/01)

On 20 March 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9286. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9286. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA

- 2016

- 0463

Directorate Identifier: 2015NM155AD

*RC* 777

- 32A0103

--- 9/11/2015

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket



### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 344 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-669, CP2024-678.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21378 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2022241EN.01002101.xml

| 24.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/21

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2022/C 241/10)

1.

As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may submit a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

| 4. | This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.









  Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/330 of 5 March 2018 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (OJ L 63, 6.3.2018, p. 15) | 7.3.2023 |

4.

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/330 of 5 March 2018 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(OJ L 63, 6.3.2018, p. 15)

7.3.2023

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight (00:00) of the day mentioned in this column

3

---
# Jfourtlj**Court of** **&m Sntonfo,** **March 27,** **2014 No.** **04-13-00307-CR Nicholas** **Aranda, Appellant** **v. The** **State of** **Texas, Appellee** **Trial Court** **Case No.** **2009CR10018B**

### ORDER**The Court** **has reviewed** **the record** **and briefs** **in this** **appeal and** **has determined** **thai oral** **argument will** **not significantly** **aid it** **in determining** **the legal** **and factual** **issues presented** **in (he** **appeal. See** **Tex. R.** **App. P.** **39.8. Therefore,** **all requests** **for oral** **argument arc** **denied, and** **the cause** **is advanced** **for ON** **BRIEFS submission** **on May** **6. 2014,** **to the** **following panel:** **Chief Justice** **Stone, Justice** **Barnard, and** **Justice Chapa.** **All parties** **will be** **notified of** **the Court's** **decision in** **this appeal** **in accordance** **with TEX.** **R. App.** **P. 4fi.** **Either party** **may file** **motion requesting** **the Court** **to reconsider** **its determination** **that oral** **argument will** **not significantly** **aid the** **Court in** **determining the** **legal and** **factual issues** **presented in** **the appeal.** **See Tex.** **R. APP.** **P. 39.8.** **Such motion** **should be** **filed within** **(en (10)** **days from** **the date** **of this** **order. It** **is so** **ORDERED on** **March 27.** **2014. Catherine** **Stone. ChicfJustice** 

## IN**WITNESS WHEREOF.** **have hereunto** **set my** **hand imd** **a/fixed the** **seal o/lhe** **said court** **on this** **March 27.** **2014.**
#### HARDIN v. STATE.

No. 18743.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 27, 1937.

Mahan & Broughton, of Childress, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful sale of whisky in a dry territory; penalty assessed at a fine of $100.

The information alleges that the appellant did then and there unlawfully sell one pint of liquor containing alcohol in excess of one-half of 1 per centum by volume, the sale of such liquor in Childress county *265having been theretofore and was then prohibited by the laws of the state.

The state’s attorney before- this court concedes that the information is insufficient to charge the offense, and in this view we are constrained to concur.

It is the uniform holding of this court that an indictment or information for violation of the local option law must show that an election was held and that as a result thereof the act complained of was prohibited. See Whitmire v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 94 S.W.(2d) 742; Grady v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 97 S.W. (2d) 472; Coleman v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 97 S.W.(2d) 701; Johnson v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 95 S.W.(2d) 419; Kelly v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 98 S.W.(2d) 998; Brooks v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 98 S.W. (2d) 999; Greenway v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 98 S.W. (2d) 1000. See Privitt v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 98 S.W.(2d) 204, for an approved form of information under the local option law. •

For the reasons stated, and upon the authorities cited, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6608

DERRICK EMMANUEL ALLEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THEODIS BECK, Secretary of Correction,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-99-363-HC-5-H)

Submitted: September 29, 2000 Decided: October 12, 2000

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Emmanuel Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,

III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Derrick Emmanuel Allen seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Allen v.

Beck, No. CA-99-363-HC-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2000). We deny

Allen’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------






               Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. & Subsidiaries
                    Certification Of Chief Financial Officer
           Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Commodore Applied Technologies,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on form  10-Q  for the  three  and  nine-month  periods  ended
September 30, 2006,  James  DeAngelis  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

         (1)  The  quarterly  report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
              section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents,
              in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and result of
              operations of the Company.



Date:    November 14, 2006


/s/ James M. DeAngelis
---------------------------------
James M. DeAngelis
Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# Exhibit 4

USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1330427 Filed: 09/19/2011 Page 1 of 11USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1330427 Filed: 09/19/2011 Page 2 of 11USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1330427 Filed: 09/19/2011 Page 3 of 11USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1330427 Filed: 09/19/2011 Page 4 of 11USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1330427 Filed: 09/19/2011 Page 5 of 11USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1330427 Filed: 09/19/2011 Page 6 of 11USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1330427 Filed: 09/19/2011 Page 7 of 11USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1330427 Filed: 09/19/2011 Page 8 of 11USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1330427 Filed: 09/19/2011 Page 9 of 11USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1330427 Filed: 09/19/2011 Page 10 of 11USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1330427 Filed: 09/19/2011 Page 11 of 11
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2638

EDGAR MICHAEL PORTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NATIONAL CON-SERV, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-4005-JFM) Submitted: January 26, 1999 Decided: February 17, 1999Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edgar Michael Porter, Appellant Pro Se. John Marshall, MOLDAWER & MARSHALL, Rockville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Edgar Porter appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Appellee and dismissing Porter’s complaint brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Porter v. National Con-Serv, Inc. , No. CA-96-4005-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|Exhibit 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby
certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. (the Company),
for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | o | the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | o | the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated: May 13, 2003
|-------------------

|                                                                    | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/  Michael J. Gaughan                                             | 
|Michael J. GaughanChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | 

|                                                       | 
|------------------------------------------------------ | 
|/s/  Gage Parrish                                      | 
|Gage ParrishVice President and Chief Financial Officer | 

|A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. and
will be retained by Coast Casinos, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------