alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12

PG&E GAS TRANSMISSION, NORTHWEST CORPORATION



SEC FILINGFORM 10-KYear End 2002



RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



|Ratio of earnings to Fixed Charges |  | 2002 |       | 2001 |   | 2000  |  | 1999 |       | 1998
|---------------------------------- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | - | ----- |  | ---- | ----- | ----
|Earnings                           |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |     
|Income from Continuing Operations  |  | $    | 79.0  |      | $ | 76.4  |  | $    | 58.4  |     
|Adjustments:                       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |     
|Income taxes                       |  |      | 43.7  |      |   | 34.5  |  |      | 37.4  |     
|Fixed charges (as below)           |  |      | 38.9  |      |   | 38.0  |  |      | 40.9  |     
|                                   |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |     
|Total adjusted earnings            |  | $    | 161.5 |      | $ | 148.9 |  | $    | 136.7 |     
|                                   |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |     
|Fixed charges:                     |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |     
|Net interest expense               |  | $    | 35.2  |      | $ | 37.0  |  | $    | 40.4  |     
|Adjustments:                       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |     
|Interest component of rents        |  |      | 0.4   |      |   | 0.3   |  |      | 0.1   |     
|AFUDC debt                         |  |      | 3.3   |      |   | 0.7   |  |      | 0.4   |     
|                                   |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |     
|Total fixed charges                |  | $    | 38.9  |      | $ | 38.0  |  | $    | 40.9  |     
|                                   |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |     
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |  |      | 4.2   |      |   | 3.9   |  |      | 3.3   |     
|                                   |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |
# C_2022170EN.01001101.xml

| 25.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/11

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10578 – CVC / EKATERRA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 170/06)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | CVC (Luxembourg), |
| --- | --- |

—

CVC (Luxembourg),

| — | ekaterra (Netherlands). |
| --- | --- |

—

ekaterra (Netherlands).

CVC acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of ekaterra. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for CVC : CVC manages investment funds and platforms. One of CVC funds’ portfolio companies, Zabka Polska S.A., is active in grocery retail in Poland; |
| --- | --- |

—

for CVC : CVC manages investment funds and platforms. One of CVC funds’ portfolio companies, Zabka Polska S.A., is active in grocery retail in Poland;

| — | for ekaterra : ekaterra and its subsidiaries carry out a tea business, consisting of the cultivation, processing and supply of leaf tea, the researching and developing, manufacturing, producing, packaging, packing, marketing, distributing and selling of tea products worldwide (excluding Unilever’s interests in the PepsiLipton joint ventures with Pepsico in relation to ready-to-drink (‘RTD’) tea). |
| --- | --- |

—

for ekaterra : ekaterra and its subsidiaries carry out a tea business, consisting of the cultivation, processing and supply of leaf tea, the researching and developing, manufacturing, producing, packaging, packing, marketing, distributing and selling of tea products worldwide (excluding Unilever’s interests in the PepsiLipton joint ventures with Pepsico in relation to ready-to-drink (‘RTD’) tea).

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10578 – CVC / EKATERRA

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2758 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2758

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 36, United States Code, to provide for the display of 
    the National League of Families POW/MIA flag at the World War I 
                               Memorials.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPLAY OF NATIONAL LEAGUE OF FAMILIES POW/MIA FLAG AT THE 
              WORLD WAR I MEMORIALS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (d)(3) of section 902 of title 36, 
United States Code, is amended by striking ``The World War II 
Memorial,'' and inserting ``The World War I Memorials, the World War II 
Memorial,''.
    (b) Days for Display.--Subsection (c)(2)(A) of such section is 
amended by inserting ``the World War I Memorials,'' before ``the World 
War II Memorial,''.

            Passed the Senate April 25, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2758

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend title 36, United States Code, to provide for the display of 
    the National League of Families POW/MIA flag at the World War I 
                               Memorials.
```
##### 



Offices .
 Corporate Seal
 
 Place of Meetings
 Regular Meetings
 Special Meetings




---



##### 



Quorum; Adjourned Meetings
  . Voting
 Closing of Books
 Notice of Meetings
  2




---



##### 



Waiver of Notice
 Nomination of Directors
 Shareholder Proposals
 3




---



##### 



General Powers
 Number; Qualification; Term of Office; Manner of Election
      4




---



##### 



Board Meetings; Calling Meetings; Notice
 5




---



##### 



Waiver of Notice
 . Quorum
 Absent Directors
 Conference Communications
 Committees
 Committee of Disinterested Persons
 Written Action
 6




---



##### 



Compensation
 Removal
 
 Number and Designation
 Chief Executive Officer
 Chief Financial Officer
 7




---



##### 



Chairman of the Board
 President
 Vice President
 Controller
 Secretary
 Treasurer
 Authority and Duties
 8




---



##### 



Removal and Vacancies
 Compensation
 
 Certificates for Shares
 Transfer of Shares
 . Loss of Certificates
 9




---



##### 



Dividends
 Record Date
 
 Voting Securities Held by the Corporation
 Purchase and Sale of Securities
 
  10
#### ALEXANDER v. STATE.

No. 20463.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 7, 1939.

Robert Sansom, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.-

Conviction is - for murder, punishment being twenty-five years in the penitentiary. The indictment properly charges the offense.

No statement of facts nor bills of exception are found in the record. '

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,259
<SECURITIES>                                     9,712
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,318
<ALLOWANCES>                                       300
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,528
<PP&E>                                           6,902
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,806
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,624
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            90
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,987
<SALES>                                          7,776
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,776
<CGS>                                            2,529
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    237
<INCOME-TAX>                                       149
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                224
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       224
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), each of the undersigned officers of MaximPharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “**Company**”),hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:

 

**1.****                                     **TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2004, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “**Periodic Report**”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and

 

**2.****                                     **Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,**eachof the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 7th day ofMay, 2004.

 
|   | /s/ Larry G. Stambaugh                      |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | Larry G. Stambaugh, Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                        |
|   | /s/ Anthony E. Altig                        |
|   | Anthony E. Altig, Chief Financial Officer   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (**“SEC”**) or its staff upon request.

 

This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-Q to which it relates, isnot deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference intoany filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after thedate of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

 

----
#### WHITLEY v. KINSEL MOTOR CO.

No. 9856.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

May 6, 1936.

John J. Pichinson, of Corpus Christi, for' appellant.

J. Marvin Ericson, of Corpus Christi, for appellee.

SMITH, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a 'judgment in favor of Kinsel Motor Company against J. C. Whitley for damages occurring to an automobile belonging to the motor company while in the possession of Whitley, as bailee.

The case presented is simple, and essentially one of fact.

It is contended by appellant, first, that the evidence did not support the measure of damages applied to the case by the trial judge; and, second, that the court erred in excluding certain evidence offered by appellant.

The measure of damages applied below was the difference between the market value of the automobile before it was wrecked while in appellant’s custody, and its market value in its wrecked condition. Appellant contends that the evidence showed the car had no market value, before or after the accident, and therefore the damages should have been measured by intrinsic, rather than market, value. We overrule the contention. The law is as stated by appellant, but his premise is contrary to the record. There was ample evidence, adduced by appellee upon direct examination of its witnesses, and reiterated by the same witnesses upon cross-examination by appellant, that the car had a market value, both before and after the accident, and therefore the true measure of damages was upon that value, and was properly applied below.

Appellant sought to introduce what was termed an “NRA Code” relating to used automobiles, as affecting the market value of the car in question. We doubt if that outlawed authority would have been admissible for any purpose in the case, but need not decide the point, for the reason that the bill of exceptions does not show the ' contents of the rejected code, or just what fact or facts therein appellant desired or intended to put in evidence. In short, appellant does not show what fact or facts he wanted, or would ' have put, in evidence, if permitted, and therefore has failed to show injury by the ruling complained of. We overrule all of appellant’s assignments of error, for the reasons stated.

On the other hand, appellee presents cross-assignments, by which it urges that, notwithstanding jury findings to the *203contrary, the trial judge should have rendered judgment for appellee in a larger amount than found by the jury. We overrule those cross-assignments of error. The evidence upon the issue of' damages conflicted in varying degrees. Most of the evidence upon that issue came from ap-pellee’s own witnesses and, when analyzed, warranted the jury findings. Other testimony, from appellant’s witness, likewise supported those findings.

The judgment is affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SIERRA CLUB,

Plaintiff,

vs.

LISA JACKSON, ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

) 

)

) 

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:11-CV-00100-JDB

 

LOCAL RULE 7.1 CERTIFICATION OF PROPOSED INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT 

BCCA APPEAL GROUP

I, the undersigned, counsel of record for BCCA Appeal Group, certify that to the best of 

my knowledge and belief, the following are parent companies, subsidiaries, or affiliates of 

BCCA Appeal Group which have any outstanding securities in the hands of the public:

BCCA Appeal Group is a non-profit corporation and has no parent companies, 

subsidiaries, or affiliates. It has no outstanding securities in the hands of the public.

These representations are made in order that judges of this court may determine the

need for recusal.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Richard P. Sobiecki

Richard P. Sobiecki (D.C. Bar # 500163)

Baker Botts L.L.P.

1299 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20004

(202) 639-7906

Zachary L. Craft

Baker Botts L.L.P.

One Shell Plaza 
2

910 Louisiana

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 229-1133

Attorneys for BCCA Appeal Group
EXHIBIT 23.2


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON SCHEDULES

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Acceptance Insurance Companies Inc.

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of
Acceptance Insurance Companies Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and
1996, and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1997, and have issued our report thereon dated March
13, 1998; such financial statements and report are included
elsewhere in this Form 10-K.  Our audits also included the
financial statement schedules of Acceptance Insurance Companies
Inc., listed in Item 14.  These financial statement schedules are
the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.  In
our opinion, such consolidated financial statements schedules,
when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
March 13, 1998
EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             As adopted pursuant to

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Quarterly Report of Park Bancorp, Inc., (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 13, 2003, (the "Report"), I, David A. Remijas,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ David A. Remijas
                                       David A. Remijas
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       May 13, 2003
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

I,  Edileen Salicrup, the Acting Chief Financial Officerof ClearComm, L.P., certify that (i) the March 31, 2003 10-Q Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the March 31, 200310-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of ClearComm, L.P.

 

 
|   | /s/ Edileen  Salicrup           |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | Edileen  Salicrup               |
|   | Acting Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | October 15,  2004               |

 

1

----
# C_2022189EN.01007001.xml

| 10.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/70

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10707 – MACQUARIE / BCI / REDEN HOLDING AND REDEN HOLDING 2020)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 189/03)

On 29 April 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10707. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10707. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21369]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 332 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-671, CP2024-680.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21369 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.20

                            UNION PLAZA LEASE RENEWAL
                              AGREEMENT NO. 2003008

PARTY A: BEIJING FU YU DA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.

PARTY B: BEIJING NINETOWNS PORTS SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

      1.    PARTY B CONTINUES TO LEASE FOR A USABLE AREA OF 1,350 SQ. M. ON THE
            FIFTH FLOOR OF UNION PLAZA.

      2.    PARTY B'S LEASE TERM RUNS FROM MAY 15, 2004 TO MAY 14, 2005.

      3.    THE MONTHLY RENT FOR PARTY B'S LEASED PREMISES IS US$19.50
            (INCLUDING THE MANAGEMENT FEE) PER SQ. M. (OF USABLE AREA), FOR A
            TOTAL OF US$26,325.00 A MONTH.

      4.    THIS LEASE RENEWAL AGREEMENT CONSISTS OF TWO IDENTICAL COPIES, AND
            EACH PARTY KEEPS ONE COPY.

      5.    REGARDING OTHER TERMS IN RESPECT TO THE LEASE AND TO THE RIGHTS AND
            OBLIGATIONS OF BOTH PARTIES, LEASE AGREEMENT NO. 2003008 WHICH WAS
            SIGNED BY BOTH PARTY A AND PARTY B WILL PREVAIL.

PARTY A (SIGNATURE): /s/ LIU HU SHENG                PARTY B (SIGNATURE):

LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE:                                LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE:

AGENT: /s/ YANG ZHE                                  AGENT: /s/ SUN XIN

DATE: MARCH 11, 2004                                 DATE: MARCH 5, 2004