alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022049EN.01000201.xml

| 31.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10585 – APMH INVEST / UNILABS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 49/02)

On 20 January 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10585. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10585. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit 

Nos. 14-1376; 14-1377 

THE FPE FOUNDATION, 

Plaintiff, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, 

v. 

LEWIS COHEN, as co-trustee of the Qualified Terminable 

Interest Property Trust, 

Defendant, Appellant/Cross-Appellant, 

MARTIN P. SOLOMON, as co-trustee of the Qualified Terminable 

Interest Property Trust; BETSY A. SOLOMON, as trustee of the 

LLLB Trust; J. ROBERT CASEY; BETSY A. SOLOMON and 

MARTIN P. SOLOMON, as co-trustees of the Cohen-Solomon Family 

Foundation, 

Defendants, Appellees/Cross-Appellees. 

ERRATA SHEET 

 The opinion of this Court issued on September 2, 2015 is 

amended as follows: 

 On page 7, line 20, and page 8, line 2, change "Suit" to 

"suit"
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7585

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DEMITRIUS COLEMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (4:04-cr-00482-TLW-2)

Submitted: February 24, 2022 Decided: March 1, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demitrius Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Demitrius Coleman appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s order 

granting or denying a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States 

v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (stating standard of review), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 

383 (2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse 

its discretion. The court denied Coleman’s motion after assuming he demonstrated 

extraordinary and compelling circumstances, discussing the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) 

factors, and sufficiently explaining the reasons for the denial. See United States v. High, 

997 F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for denial 

of straightforward compassionate release motion). We therefore affirm the district court’s 

order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|Exhibit 12                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Peoples Energy Corporation and Subsidiary Companies                                         
|                                                                                            
|Statement Re:  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges *                          
|(Dollars in Thousands)                                                                      
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Net Income Before Preferred                                                                 
|Stock Dividends, as reported                                                                
|                                                                                            
|Undistributed earnings from equity investees                                                
|                                                                                            
|Add - Income Taxes                                                                          
|Fixed charges excluding capitalized interest                                                
|                                                                                            
|Earnings                                                                                    
|                                                                                            
|Fixed charges including capitalized interest                                                
|                                                                                            
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                                          
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|*  Prior year amounts have been restated to reflect the conversion to successful efforts and
|to adjust for undistributed equity income.                                                  
|
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 184 (Monday, September 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 77534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21662]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Eunice 
Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group, Population Sciences Study Section, 
October 25, 2024, 09:00 a.m. to 05:00 p.m., Hyatt Regency Bethesda, 
7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814, which was published in the 
Federal Register on June 17, 2024, FR Doc. No. 2024-13310, 89 FR 51537.
    This notice is being amended to change the start time of the 
meeting from 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. E.T. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: September 18, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-21662 Filed 9-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2776 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations with respect 

to the size standards certain air carriers utilize for carry-on baggage, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2015 

Mr. COHEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations 

with respect to the size standards certain air carriers 

utilize for carry-on baggage, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Carry-On Freedom Act 

5 of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CARRY-ON BAGGAGE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

8 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transpor9 tation shall issue regulations to prohibit a covered air carVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:21 Jun 18, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2776.IH H2776

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2776 IH

1 rier from utilizing a size standard with respect to carry2 on baggage that reduces, in any manner, the size standard 

3 utilized by the carrier on June 8, 2015. 

4 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi5 nitions apply: 

6 (1) AIR CARRIER.—The term ‘‘air carrier’’ has 

7 the meaning given that term in section 40102(a) of 

8 title 49, United States Code. 

9 (2) COVERED AIR CARRIER.—The term ‘‘cov10 ered air carrier’’ means any air carrier that charges 

11 passengers a fee for checked baggage. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SHI->S

SHt'tS

CCA # 13-13-00372-CR OFFENSE: Sexual Assault sso-tf

DAVID ALLEN RUSSELL v. THE STATE OF

STYLE: TEXAS COUNTY: Collin

TRIAL COURT: 199th District Court MOTION

TRIAL COURT #: 199-81323-2012 FOR REHEARING IS:

TRIAL COURT JUDGE: Hon. Angela Michelle

Tucker

DATE: April 9, 2015

DISPOSITION: Affirmed JUDGE: ChiefJustice Valdez

DATE:

JUSTICE: PC S

PUBLISH: DNP:

CLK RECORD: X SUPPCLKRECORD X

RPT RECORD: X SUPP RPT RECORD

STATE BR: X SUPPBR

APP BR': X PROSE BR

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APPELLANT^ Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: JV/y 2^ g<?/*~

JUDGE: P<^

CCA#

Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:.

PUBLISH:

SHt'fS

5V9-/S

SSO-IS

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS:

CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ON ON

JUDGE:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2928 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

201 B Street in Perryville, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Harold George Bennett 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2015 

Mr. HILL (for himself, Mr. WOMACK, Mr. CRAWFORD, and Mr. WESTERMAN) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 201 B Street in Perryville, Arkansas, as the 

‘‘Harold George Bennett Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HAROLD GEORGE BENNETT POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 201 B Street in Perryville, Ar6 kansas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Harold 

7 George Bennett Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2928 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Harold George Ben3 nett Post Office’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 18, 2013

No. 04-13-00236-CR

Esain Orlando CARMONA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 386th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR4882

Honorable Laura Parker, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant pled nolo contendere to aggravated robbery. 

The trial court’s certification of defendant’s right to appeal states this “is a plea-bargain case, and the 

defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After appellant filed his notice of 

appeal, the court clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(e). 

Appellant filed two pro se notices of appeal, in which he asserts a written pre-trial motion to 

suppress was denied on June 27, 2012. The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain agreement, 

and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the State and agreed to 

by the appellant. The clerk’s record also contains two motions to suppress, but does not contain any 

orders ruling on any pre-trial motions. 

“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised 

by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to 

appeal.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows 

the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made a part of the record.” TEX. R. APP. P. 

25.2(d).

It is therefore ORDERED this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 25.2(d), unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of 

appeal has been made part of the appellate record by May 17, 2013. See Daniels v. State, 110 

S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.CSan Antonio 2003, order); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1. 

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification 

issue.
_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of April, 2013.

 ____________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          31,666
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,358
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,004,227
<DEPRECIATION>                                 130,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,096,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,682,138
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           475
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,129,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,096,627
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               138,148
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      984
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                79,070
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,598
<INCOME-TAX>                                       152
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,446
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,446
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1








**Chief
      Executive Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Edward V. Lett, President and Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operation of the Company.








Date:May
                9, 2007
            /s/
                Edward V. LettEdward
                V. Lett
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to TIB Financial Corp. and will be retained
      by
      TIB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE 04360A204
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the November
30, 1996, financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                             425
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     399010
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                450597
<PP&E>                                          782935
<DEPRECIATION>                                  277643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1293118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           319593
<BONDS>                                         618667
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      40600
<COMMON>                                           400
<OTHER-SE>                                      248731
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1293118
<SALES>                                        2642829
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2650905
<CGS>                                          1906734
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1906734
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               60488
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (49780)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (30702)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (19078)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (19078)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### SANCHO v. STATE.

No. 17577.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 15, 1935.

E. H. Smartt, of Austin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of theft of property over the value of $50, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of six years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The sentence is improperly entered, in that it fails to take note of the Indeterminate Sentence Law as set forth in article 775, C. C. P.' 1925, as amended by Acts 1931, c. 207, § 1 (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 775). The judgment and sentence will be reformed in that particular so as to declare that the appellant shall be confined in the state penitentiary for a term of not less than two, nor more than six, years.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

MORROW, P. J., absent.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
#### PADGETT v. STATE.

No. 21037.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 8, 1940.

R. Tuck Chapin, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for murder, punishment assessed being 99 years in the penitentiary.

The record fails to show any notice of appeal, which is necessary to confer jurisdiction on this court. See Art. 827, C.C.P., and cases cited under said article, Note 1, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.C.C.P.

The appeal is dismissed.
Order entered September 12, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00823-CR

WILLIE MAURICE HERVEY, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 89th District Court

Wichita County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 57,785-C

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s September 10, 2018 final motion for extension of time to 

file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the State’s brief received September 6, 2018 

filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE