alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | **Exhibit 24** |
|--------|----------------|

|   | ***Power of Attorney*** |
|--------|-------------------------|

 

We, the undersigned, Directors of Perini Corporation, hereby severally constitute Robert Band and Kenneth R. Burk, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys, with full power to them and to each of them to sign for us, and in our names in the capacities indicated below, any Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any and all amendments to said Annual Report on Form 10-K, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said Attorneys to said Annual Report on Form 10-K and to any and all amendments thereto and generally to do all such things in our names and behalf and in our said capacities as will enable Perini Corporation to comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and all requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

WITNESS our hands and common seal on the date set forth below. 

 

| */s/Marilyn A. Alexander***     | Director | February 27, 2009 |
|---------------------------------|----------|-------------------|
| Marilyn A. Alexander            |     | Date              |
| * *                        |     |              |
| */s/Peter Arkley***             | Director | February 27, 2009 |
| Peter Arkley                    |     | Date              |
| * *                        |     |              |
| */s/Robert Band***              | Director | February 27, 2009 |
| Robert Band                     |     | Date              |
|                            |     |              |
| */s/Willard W. Brittain, Jr.*** | Director | February 27, 2009 |
| Willard W. Brittain, Jr.        |     | Date              |
| * *                        |     |              |
| */s/Robert A. Kennedy***        | Director | February 27, 2009 |
| Robert A. Kennedy               |     | Date              |
|                            |     |              |
| */s/Michael R. Klein***         | Director | February 27, 2009 |
| Michael R. Klein                |     | Date              |
|                            |     |              |
| */s/Robert L. Miller***         | Director | February 27, 2009 |
| Robert L. Miller                |     | Date              |
|                            |     |              |
| */s/Chrysostomos L. Nikias***   | Director | February 27, 2009 |
| Chrysostomos L. Nikias          |     | Date              |
| * *                        |     |              |
| */s/Raymond R. Oneglia***       | Director | February 27, 2009 |
| Raymond R. Oneglia              |     | Date              |
|                            |     |              |
| */s/Donald D. Snyder***         | Director | February 27, 2009 |
| Donald D. Snyder                |     | Date              |
|                            |     |              |
| */s/Ronald N. Tutor***          | Director | February 27, 2009 |
| Ronald N. Tutor                 |     | Date              |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-1996
<CASH>                                           2,137
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,872
<ALLOWANCES>                                        27
<INVENTORY>                                      6,265
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,932
<PP&E>                                         119,296
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,654
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,575
<BONDS>                                         69,147
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (27,289)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,966
<SALES>                                        149,497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               149,147
<CGS>                                           46,823
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                94,835
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,657
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,657
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,657
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 73697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20485]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4787-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


West Virginia; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of West Virginia (FEMA-4787-DR), dated May 24, 2024, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued August 16, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of West Virginia is hereby amended to include the 
following area among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of May 24, 2024.

    Boone County for Individual Assistance (already designated for 
Public Assistance).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-20485 Filed 9-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Order filed September 4, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00363-CV

____________

WILFRIDO MATA, Appellant

V.

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-44692

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due August 20, 2014. No brief or motion for extension 

of time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before October 6, 2014, 

the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,028,463
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               35,272,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 35,139,693
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            78,065,906
<PP&E>                                      11,068,976
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              90,558,409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       41,151,925
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    37,380,555
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,798,434
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                90,558,409
<SALES>                                    108,043,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           108,043,067
<CGS>                                       97,056,784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,285,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               317,128
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,616,001)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,979,660)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,636,341)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,636,341)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BIOANALYSIS
CORP.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          25,323
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,180
<INVENTORY>                                     24,496
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,512
<PP&E>                                          23,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,029
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 208,774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,875
<BONDS>                                            226
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           111
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   208,774
<SALES>                                         98,718
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,718
<CGS>                                           48,604
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   297
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,933
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,219
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,714
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,714
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
     I, Kenneth A. Swanstrom, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Penn Engineering &Manufacturing Corp., certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2004 of the registrant;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report.  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
 

 

 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.   Date: March 16, 2005 /s/ Kenneth A. Swanstrom   Kenneth A. Swanstrom, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-1658

___________ Virgil O. Hooker; Dora E. Hooker; * David O. Hooker; Gloria J. * Hooker, * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Bentley E. Story, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 20, 1998 Filed: April 7, 1998

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circui t Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Virgil O. Hooker, Dora E. Hooker, David O. Hooker, and Glor ia J. Hooker sued an Arkansas state j udge, alleging he had violated their constitutional rights by making cer tain rulings in a prior foreclosure action brought against the Hookers. The districtThe Ho norable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- court granted, on the basis of absolute judicial immunity, defendant & s motion to 1 dismiss, and denied the Hookers & postjudgment motions. Having carefully reviewed the record, we concludethe district court & s rulings were clearly correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See8th Cir. R. 47A(a). A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-FAA 2013-0447 Directorate Identifier: 2013-NE-17-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Operation 

prohibition 0.0 $ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00 20 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): N/A
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
Gabbai and Company
Certified Public Accountants (Isr)

Tel Aviv, March 4, 1998

Auditors' Report to the Shareholders of Kedem Chemicals Ltd.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Kedem Chemicals Ltd. (the
Company) as at December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the consolidated balance sheets of
the Company and its subsidiaries as at such dates, and the related statements of
income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years, the
last of which ended December 31, 1997. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's Board of Directors and of its Management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, including standards prescribed by the Auditors Regulations (Manner of
Auditor's Performance) 1973. Such standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free of
material misstatement, whether due to error or intentional misrepresentation. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the Board of
Directors and by Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

The above mentioned financial statements were prepared on the basis of the
historical cost convention, in historical values adjusted for the changes in the
general purchasing power of the Israeli currency, in accordance with opinions of
the Institute of Certified Public Accountants in Israel. Condensed data of the
Company in nominal historical values, on the basis of which its adjusted
financial statements were prepared, is presented in Note 28.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of the Company and the
consolidated financial position of the Company and its subsidiaries as at
December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the results of their operations, the last of
which ended December 31, 1997, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. Furthermore, these statements have, in our opinion, been prepared in
accordance with the Securities Regulations (Preparation of Annual Financial
Statements) 1993.

Without qualifying our above opinion we would call attention to Note 1(C) to the
financial statements regarding the select material segments of activity of the
Company and the subsidiary.

Gabbai and Company
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
#### AMERICAN NAT. INS. CO. v. WALSH.

No. 9844.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

April 8, 1936.

*212Claud J. Carter, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Charles W. Anderson, of San Antonio, for appellee.

SMITH, Chief Justice.

This action is for the amount of insurance upon the life of Gertrude M. Pia, née Aldrich, whose death was presumed because of seven years’ absence, as provided in article S541, R.S.1925. Gertrude Walsh, the beneficiary designated in the policies of insurance in suit, recovered the amount of said policies, plus the prescribed penalty of 12 per cent, of said amount, and $150-at-torney’s fee, as provided in article 4736, as amended by the Acts of 1931 (42d Leg. p. 135, c. 91, § 1 [Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 4736]). The cause was tried by the court without a jury.

The evidence supported the presumption of death as contemplated in the statute, and the judgment based thereon will not be disturbed.

But there was no evidence upon the issue of the amount or reasonableness of attorney’s fee. The statute is highly penal in its nature, and must be strictly construed and pursued in order to warrant recovery thereon. The reasonableness of the attorney’s fee is purely a question of fact, and must be established by competent affirmative evidence, before judgment can be rendered for such fee. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. v. Bertrand (Tex.Civ.App.) 47 S.W. (2d) 631; Id. (Tex.Com.App.) 65 S.W. (2d) 279; Wichita Valley Ry. Co. v. Wood (Tex.Civ.App.) 284 *S.W.*301; Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. Price (Tex.Civ.App.) 192 S.W. 805. Therefore, the judgment for attorney’s fee, being without any evidence to support it, cannot stand.

Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed, upon condition that appellee, within ten days from rendition hereof, shall file remit-titur of $150; otherwise the judgment will be reversed in its entirety, and the cause remanded for another trial.

Affirmed on condition.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Robert E. Rout, of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (“First Commonwealth”), certify that this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of First Commonwealth on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013 , fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of First Commonwealth at the end of such period and the results of operations of First Commonwealth for such period.





DATED: August 13, 2013/s/ Robert E. RoutRobert E. RoutExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer