alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.4

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of
Southern California Gas Company (the "Company") certifies that:

(i)	the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



February 24, 2004
                                               /S/ DEBRA L. REED
                                             ______________________
                                               Debra L. Reed
                                               Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------



               Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. & Subsidiaries
                    Certification Of Chief Executive Officer
           Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Commodore Applied Technologies,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on form  10-Q for the  three  and  nine  month  periods  ended
September  30,  2004,  Shelby  Brewer  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

         (1)  The annual report fully complies with the  requirements of section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents,
              in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

Date:    November 14, 2004


/s/ Shelby T. Brewer
--------------------
Shelby T. Brewer
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 1636

In re: MICHAEL KENNY CARTER, a/k/a Blaze , Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 3:17

- cr - 00351

- JMC

- 1 ; 3:22

- cv - 00635

- JMC )

Submitted : July 21, 2022 Decided: August 5, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Michael Kenny Carter , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1636 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/05/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Michael Kenny Carter petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The pr esent record does not reveal undue delay
in the district court. A ccordingly, we deny the mandamus petition and supplemental mandamus petition . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material s before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1636 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/05/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     Exhibit 15


Letter Re:  Unaudited Interim Financial Information
---------------------------------------------------
Aetna Inc.
Hartford, Connecticut

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re:  Registration Statements No. 333-07169, 333-08427, 333-08429, 333-08431,
333-52321, 333-68881, 333-52321-01, 333-52321-02, 333-52321-03, 333-52321-04,
and 333-52321-05.


With respect to the Registration Statements filed by Aetna Inc. or its
Subsidiaries, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report
dated August 3, 2000 related to our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
August 3, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 285 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 285

    To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a penalty for 
 knowingly selling advertising that offers certain commercial sex acts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2015

 Mrs. Wagner (for herself, Mrs. Black, Ms. Brownley of California, Mr. 
Jolly, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Cramer, Mr. LoBiondo, Mrs. Walorski, 
 Mr. Joyce, Mr. Barr, Mr. Lance, Mr. Gosar, Ms. Jenkins of Kansas, Mr. 
 Rothfus, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Frelinghuysen, Mr. Hultgren, Mr. Cook, Mr. 
Pearce, Ms. Bass, Mrs. Beatty, Mrs. Bustos, Ms. Castor of Florida, Ms. 
Clark of Massachusetts, Ms. Esty, Ms. Frankel of Florida, Ms. Kelly of 
 Illinois, Ms. Meng, Mr. Schock, Mr. Paulsen, Mrs. Noem, Mr. Clay, Mr. 
McCaul, Mr. Gibson, and Mr. Kline) introduced the following bill; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a penalty for 
 knowingly selling advertising that offers certain commercial sex acts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Advertising Victims of 
Exploitation Act of 2015'' or the ``SAVE Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. ADVERTISING THAT OFFERS CERTAIN COMMERCIAL SEX ACTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1591 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended in subsection (a)(1), by inserting after ``obtains,'' the 
following: ``advertises,''.
    (b) Mens Rea Requirement.--Section 1591 of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended in subsection (a), by inserting after ``knowing, or'' 
the following: ``, except where, in an offense under paragraph (2), the 
act constituting the violation of paragraph (1) is advertising,''.
    (c) Conforming Amendments.--Section 1591(b) of title 18, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``or obtained'' and 
        inserting ``obtained, or advertised''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``or obtained'' and 
        inserting ``obtained, or advertised''.
                                 <all>
```
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 10-0934

IN RE SHEILA KENNEDY

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relator’s emergency motion for temporary relief, filed November 15, 2010, is granted.  The court of appeals opinion and judgment dated July 16, 2010, in Cause No. 14-10-00229-CV, styled *In re Liberty Insurance Corporation and Michelle Yaklin*, in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals are stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this December 3, 2010.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-50724

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Victor Ines Rosales-Ramirez, 

Defendant—Appellant,

consolidated with

_____________

No. 21-50741

_____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Victor Rosales-Ramirez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-272-1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 12, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-50724 Document: 00516277136 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/12/2022
No. 21-50724

c/w No. 21-50741

2

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Victor Rosales-Ramirez pleaded guilty to a charge of illegally 

reentering the United States after removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326.1 On appeal, 

Rosales challenges only one of his standard supervised release conditions. He 

concedes that the district court expressly stated that the supervised release it 

ordered was subject to “[t]he standard and mandatory conditions of 

supervision.” Because he did not object, he also concedes that our standard 

of review is for plain error which requires, among other things, that he show 

that “the legal error [was] clear or obvious.” Puckett v. United States, 556

U.S. 129, 135 (2009). We agree with his concessions. 

The Western District of Texas, where he was sentenced, has a set of 

standard conditions including number 12 as follows: 

If the probation officer determines that the defendant poses a 

risk to another person (including an organization), the 

probation officer may require the defendant to notify the 

person about the risk and the defendant shall comply with that 

instruction. The probation officer may contact the person and 

confirm that the defendant has notified the person about the 

risk.

Rosales contends that this standard condition constitutes an impermissible 

delegation of judicial authority to the probation officer which, in other 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

1 Rosales’ssupervised release for a prior conviction was revoked. However, he fails

to raise any issue regarding any aspect of that revocation, so he has waived any issue on that 

count.

Case: 21-50724 Document: 00516277136 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/12/2022
No. 21-50724

c/w No. 21-50741

3

situations, we have found to be erroneous. See, e.g., United States v. Franklin, 

838 F.3d 564, 568 (5th Cir. 2016). 

As Rosales admits, however, we have not addressed this standard 

condition. As a result, our court recently held that imposition of this standard 

condition is not plain error. See United States v. Henderson, ___ F.4th ___, 

No. 21-50526, 2022 WL 871882, 2 (5th Cir. Mar. 24, 2022). Accordingly, 

we conclude that Rosales cannot prevail.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-50724 Document: 00516277136 Page: 3 Date Filed: 04/12/2022
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of China RuiTai International Holdings Co., Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Gang Ma, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  August 6,2008 /s/ Gang Ma Chief Financial Officer
p<pcWV a^U'^t^ ^ 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

•-\mm\ TF 

Jennifer Slaight-Hansen [jennifer.slaight-hansen@aberdee(i,:S<;f.ia^il/';j ^-^,^ 

Friday, December 16, 2011 11:40 AM •• v ,.v Jrn \ Tp,i 

Devany, Dennis (OST) -' ^ ' "' •'"•' "^'' 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Aberdeen, SD EAS Selection 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 31 

Hello Mr. DeVany, 

I'm writing today to urge your prompt selection of SkyWest airlines as the Essential Air Service provider for 

Aberdeen Regional Airport. I'm hearing frequently from constituents who are concerned about Delta's decision 

to reduce our weekend service to one flight per day. 

Some might feel that weekend flights aren't such a huge concern because most business travel occurs during the 

week. However, I'm told that people are having trouble booking vacation flights. Here in the upper Midwest, we 

frequently plan vacations to warmer climates during the dead of winter. So, reducing flight options during this 

season is of special concern to many citizens. 

Therefore, your expediency in processing this decision would be much appreciated. 

Thank you, 

Jennifer Slaight-Hansen 

Councilor - Northwest District 

Aberdeen, South Dakota
| **CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Parentheticals) (USD $)** | 12 Months Ended |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| Cash Dividends on Common Stock                                              | $ 0.10          | $ 0.04 | $ 0.04 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate dividends paid during the period for each share of common stock outstanding.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Regulation S-X (SX) -Number 210 -Section 04 -Article 3Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 505 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.3-04) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6959260&loc=d3e187085-122770
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_CommonStockDividendsPerShareCashPaid**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**num:perShareItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
March 24, 2015 

Mr. Kevin Dillard 

8366 Lake Baca Drive 

San Diego, CA 92119 

Dear Mr. Dillard: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request 

We entered your February 12, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0465), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9521. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Jake Troutman 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
N / E / W / S     R / E / L / E / A / S / E





November 13, 2017





FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


For more information, contact:


David L. Ortega, First Vice President/Director of Investor Relations


765-378-8937


http://www.firstmerchants.com/





SOURCE: First Merchants Corporation, Muncie, Indiana





FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION ELECTS MICHAEL C. MARHENKE TO ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS





First Merchants Corporation, a $9.0 billion financial holding company, has elected Michael C. Marhenke to the Boards of Directors of First Merchants Corporation and First Merchants Bank.  Mr. Marhenke was the President and CEO of Independent Alliance Banks, Inc. prior to its acquisition by First Merchants Corporation on July 14, 2017.





Charles E. Schalliol, Chairman of the Board, commented, “The entire Board of Directors is excited to be adding a Director with Mike Marhenke’s breadth of experience in banking and his knowledge of the Fort Wayne marketplace to our already strong board.  I believe our shareholders and customers will be very enthusiastic about Mike joining us.”





Mr. Marhenke stated, “Throughout the acquisition process, I learned much about First Merchants and its people, and am excited to be joining the Board of a growing, high performing institution.  I look forward to bringing my banking experience and my experience with the Fort Wayne marketplace to First Merchants.”





In making the announcement, Michael C. Rechin, President and Chief Executive Officer stated, “First Merchants is truly fortunate to welcome a leader of Mike’s stature to our organization as a new Director. Mike’s financial expertise, 40 years of banking experience, knowledge of the Fort Wayne marketplace and his work with community organizations in the northeast Indiana area will provide us with excellent guidance as First Merchants grows as the premier community bank.”





Mr. Marhenke also serves on the United Way Campaign Cabinet, the Board of Directors of the David Hefner International Exchange, and the New Haven Adams Township Park Department Board.








About First Merchants Corporation:





First Merchants Corporation is a financial holding company headquartered in Muncie, Indiana. The Corporation has one full-service bank charter, First Merchants Bank.  The Bank also operates as Lafayette Bank & Trust and First Merchants Private Wealth Advisors (each as a division of First Merchants Bank).





First Merchants Corporation’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market System under the symbol FRME. Quotations are carried in daily newspapers and can be found on the company’s Internet web page ( http://www.firstmerchants.com ).





FIRST MERCHANTS and the Shield Logo are federally registered trademarks of First Merchants Corporation.
# C_2022211EN.01000101.xml

| 30.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10706 – HAL INVESTMENTS / ROYAL BOSKALIS WESTMINSTER)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 211/01)

On 12 May 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10706. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10706. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<CIK>                         0001013564
<NAME>                        Farm Family Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           972,109
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          8,025
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            7,952
<EQUITIES>                                     45,197
<MORTGAGE>                                     22,034
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 1,078,241
<CASH>                                         20,018
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             23,530
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         17,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,241,604
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                422,465
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            76,728
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          510,768
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          5,830
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       61
<OTHER-SE>                                     179,199
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,241,604
<PREMIUMS>                                     160,806
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            40,619
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (1,004)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 1,023
<BENEFITS>                                     133,198
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    27,772
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           14,781
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                20,019
<INCOME-TAX>                                   5,865
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            14,154
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   14,154
<EPS-BASIC>                                  2.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.38
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 143,525
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            114,243
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              1,916
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             42,933
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               50,630
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                166,121
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0



</TABLE>