alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------





               Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. & Subsidiaries
                    Certification Of Chief Financial Officer
           Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Commodore Applied Technologies,  Inc.
(the "Company") on form 10-Q for the three and six-month  periods ended June 30,
2006, James DeAngelis hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of his knowledge:

         (1)  The  quarterly  report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
              section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents,
              in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

Date:    August 21, 2006

/s/ James M. DeAngelis
----------------------
James M. DeAngelis
Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2377 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 200 West 2nd Street in Dayton, Ohio, 

as the ‘‘Walter H. Rice Federal Building and United 

States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2377 ES

1 SECTION 1. WALTER H. RICE FEDERAL BUILDING AND 

2 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Federal building and United 

4 States courthouse located at 200 West 2nd Street in Day5 ton, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Walter 

6 H. Rice Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the Federal building and United States court10 house referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be 

11 a reference to the ‘‘Walter H. Rice Federal Building and 

12 United States Courthouse’’. 

Passed the Senate June 7, 2018. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2377 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building and United 

house’’. Federal Building and United States CourtStreet in Dayton, Ohio, as the ‘‘Walter H. Rice States courthouse located at 200 West 2nd
Exhibit 23.2

                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT

                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors of
   nStor Technologies, Inc.


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement  on Form S-8 of our report  dated  February  9, 2001,  relating to the
consolidated  financial statements of nStor Technologies,  Inc. and subsidiaries
and of our report dated February 9, 2001, relating to the schedules appearing in
the Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2002.
Our reports contain an explanatory  paragraph regarding the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Costa Mesa, California
March 24, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2758 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2758

    To make permanent the returning worker exception to the annual 
    numerical limitation on nonimmigrant visas issued under section 
 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2015

 Mr. Boustany introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To make permanent the returning worker exception to the annual 
    numerical limitation on nonimmigrant visas issued under section 
 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. H-2B NUMERICAL LIMITATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 214(g)(9)(A) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(9)(A)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(A) Subject to paragraphs (B) and (C), an alien who has already 
been counted toward the numerical limitation of paragraph (1)(B) during 
1 of the 3 preceding fiscal years shall not again be counted toward 
such limitation during a fiscal year. Such an alien shall be considered 
a returning worker.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on October 1, 2015. If this section is enacted after such 
date, the amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect as if 
enacted on such date.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32(a)
  
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company, Peoples Gas
and North Shore Gas.
 /s/ Thomas M. Patrick
    
    
    
    December 9, 2005DateThomas M. PatrickChairman of the Board,President and Chief
Executive Officer ofPeoples Energy Corporation/s/ Thomas M. Patrick
    
    
    
    December 9, 2005DateThomas M. PatrickChairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer ofThe Peoples Gas Light and Coke
Company/s/ Thomas M. Patrick
    
    
    
    December 9, 2005DateThomas M. PatrickChairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer ofNorth Shore Gas Company
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40307 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ISAURO PENA

- GARZA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:13

- CR

- 1730

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Isauro Pena

- Garza
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v . Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pena

- Garza h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 21, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40307 Document: 00513240176 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2015No. 15

- 40307

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-40307 Document: 00513240176 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2015
# C_2022381EN.01000101.xml

| 4.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10822 – ARDIAN / TA ASSOCIATES / ODEALIM GROUP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 381/01)

On 6 September 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10822. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10822. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### HAUGHT v. STATE.

No. 16780.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 16, 1934.

Howard L. Martin, of Grand Saline, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is burglary of a private residence; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Exhibit 10-2


 


THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC.


2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


OPTION AWARD CERTIFICATE


 


This Certificate, when executed by a duly authorized
officer of The Navigators Group, Inc. (the “Company”), evidences the grant to
the Participant named herein of an Option to purchase shares of the Common
Stock of the Company in accordance with the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).


 


1.             Participant:


 


2.             Number of shares of Common Stock subject to
the Option:  


 


3.             Option Price:  $       per
share


 


4.             Effective date of the Option:


 


5.             Expiration Date of the Option:


 


6.             Type of  Option:


 


7.             Option Vesting Period (see Plan document for
complete details):


 


With respect to the shares subject to the Option, a
Participant may exercise 25% of such shares beginning one year after the
effective date of the Option, 50% of such shares beginning two years after the
effective date of the Option, 75% of such shares beginning three years after
the effective date of the Option and 100% of such shares beginning four years
after the effective date of the Option.


 


8.             Employee shall make such arrangements with
the Company with respect to income tax withholding as the Company shall
determine in its sole discretion is appropriate to ensure payment of federal,
state or local income taxes.


 


9.             An Option may be exercised only by a written
notice to the Company of intent to exercise such Option with respect to a
specific number of shares of the Common Stock (minimum of 500 shares or the
entire amount vested if less than 500 shares) and payment to the Company of the
amount of the option price multiplied by the number of shares of the Common
Stock so specified.


 


10.           The Option is subject to, and governed by,
all of the terms of the Plan.  By
acceptance of this Certificate, the Participant agrees to abide by all terms and  conditions of the
Plan.  Terms defined in the Plan are used
in this Certificate as so defined.


 


This Certificate is not a security and does not represent the Option
described herein but, rather, describes the Option granted to the Participant
as reflected on the books and records of the Company.  Neither this Certificate nor the Option
represented hereby are assignable or transferable by
the Participant except as otherwise permitted under the Plan.


 


	
   

  	
  The Navigators Group, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Stanley A. Galanski

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  President & Chief Executive Officer
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

?femreble I. E. Lanlep &xi@y Auditor.. .



### aroaot 

## truuferablo

to theere4ltof uwtinrdlstriot wlthln trm 6661 

### hu5tln Broth- +wa Brldgo warty coulty, 247 5. 18. BrotnoM Ye Potton, 226 9. w. 702

In view of the fcm~0slq JOti are re8poatrull~ adYlwd tint it 1s the opLJo¶Lof tur 4epartmeat that em comml8sloI-AeM'

court of cw


## verytrulyJOura
## In t he Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 23

- 00070

- CV

ANDREW WALKER , JR. , Appellant

V. WANDA DANIELS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

ESTATE OF CARLES B. DANIELS, DECEASED, ET AL. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 124th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021

- 1518

- B

Before Stevens , C.J., van Cleef and Rambin , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens2 

### ME MORANDUM OPINION

A ndrew Walker , Jr. , proceeding pro se, has f i led a n appeal in this Court

. Upon our
review of Walker ’s filing, we noted a potential defect in the Court’s jurisdiction over th e appeal. Section 11.102 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code provides that “ [a] vexatious litigant subject to a pre f iling o rder under Section 11.101 is prohibited from filing, pro se, new litigation in a court to which the or der applies without seeking the permission of

. . . the local administrative judge. ” T EX
. C IV
. P RAC

. & R EM
. C ODE A NN
. § 11.102(a). Although the

c lerk of this Court may file an appeal from a prefiling order, the c lerk “may not file a litigation, original procee ding, appeal, or other claim presented, pro se, by a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order under Section 11.101 unless the litig a n t obtains an order from the appropriate local administrative judge described by Section 11.102(a) permitting the fi ling.” T EX
. C IV
. P RAC

. & R EM
. C ODE A NN
. § 11.103(a), (d).
The 124 th Judicial District Court of Gregg C ounty issued its order in trial c ou rt cause numb er 2021

- 1518

- B , styled Wanda Daniels, Indi vidually and as P ersonal R epresentative of the
E state of Carles B. Daniels, Deceased v. Highl and Dallas Freight, Inc., Hana L. Kassa, and Andrew Walker, Jr

. , on April 24 , 20 23 , prohibiting Wa lker fr om filing any n ew litigation in a court of this State without first obtaining permi ssion from a local administrative judge. S ee T EX
. C IV
. P RAC

. & R EM
. C ODE A NN
. § § 11.101

– . 103. By letter dated November 15 , 2023 , we notified Wa lker of this potential d efe ct in our jurisdiction , along with another potential jurisdictional defect , namely, t hat Walke r is attempting to appeal fro m an unappealable, interlocutory order. We afforded Walker the opportunity to3

show this Court how it h ad jurisdict ion ove r this appeal , including the filing of a supplemental record, if necessary . We further informed Walker that the failure to respond by November 27,
2023 , would result in dismissal of this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX
. R

. A PP
. P

. 42.3(a)

. Alth ough Walker re sponded to our letter , his response failed to demonstrate proper grounds for our retention of this appeal.
We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Scot t E. Stevens Chief Justice
Date Subm itt ed: November 30, 2 023 Date Decid ed: De cember 1 , 2023
# C_2022295EN.01000101.xml

| 2.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10787 – SONY / HONDA / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 295/01)

On 26 July 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10787. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10787. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2754 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the work opportunity 

credit permanent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2015 

Mr. REED (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, and Ms. JENKINS of Kansas) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

the work opportunity credit permanent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT MADE PERMA4 NENT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 51(c) of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph (4) 

7 and redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (4). 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2754 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to individuals who begin for the 

3 employer after December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!--XBRL Document Created with Wdesk from Workiva-->
<!--Copyright 2022 Workiva-->
<!--r:052ada49-2bb8-46d0-b3fb-94712f2b2548,g:2df4c012-1494-4911-b39c-4bcf9dba81ac-->
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:link="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" xmlns:ea="http://www.ea.com/20220719" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://www.ea.com/20220719">
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xlink-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-linkbase-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2022" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2022/dei-2022.xsd"/>
  <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="ea-20220719_lab.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/labelLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="ea-20220719_pre.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:roleType id="CoverPage" roleURI="http://www.ea.com/role/CoverPage">
        <link:definition>0001001 - Document - Cover Page</link:definition>
        <link:usedOn>link:presentationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:calculationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:definitionLink</link:usedOn>
      </link:roleType>
    </xs:appinfo>
  </xs:annotation>
</xs:schema>
</XBRL>
Exhibit 10(b)

CMS Energy

5444 Westheimer Road/P.O. Box 4967

Houston, Texas 77056-5306/77210-4967

January 26, 2000

The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company

130 E. Randolph Dr, 22nd floor

Chicago, IL  60601

Re:	Quick Notice Transportation Agreement No. 013966 between Trunkline Gas Company and The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company dated December 1, 1995

Dear Shipper:

With reference to the subject agreement, Trunkline Gas Company and The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company hereby agree to amend the primary term of the agreement to extend the term for an additional three (3) year period through March 31, 2003.  Theeffective date of the extension is April 1, 2000.  In addition, the volume will be increased to 57,377 Dt/d with an East Louisiana receipt point.  The effective date of the volume increase will be 11/1/2000.

All other terms and conditions of the agreement remain in full force and effect.

If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please so indicate by having a duly authorized representative execute both originals of this agreement in the appropriate space provided below and return both executed originals to the letterhead address.

Sincerely,

 

TRUNKLINE GAS COMPANY   
By: 
/s/  Richard C. Snapp  
Agent and Attorney-In-Fact

Accepted and Agreed to this
  2nd    day of   March  ,   1999   
THE PEOPLES GAS LIGHT AND COKE COMPANY   
By 
/s/  D. M. Field  
(Name)  
Executive Vice President  
(Title)
[Nos. 44066-7-I; 46128-1-I.

Division One.

October 30, 2000.]

#### Helen Stanwell, *Appellant,*v. King County Parks, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-2-06467-6, William L. Downing, J., entered December 23, 2000. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Agid, C.J., concurred in by Becker and Ellington, JJ.
# C_2022168EN.01000301.xml

| 22.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10583 – CPP INVESTMENTS / VOTORANTIM / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 168/03)

On 8 April 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10583. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10583. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---