alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022107EN.01000101.xml

| 4.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/376, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/375 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine

(2022/C 107/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons who appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/376 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 (3) as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/375 (4) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/119/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 208/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered, before 10 December 2022 to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1 |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 26.

(2)  OJ L 70, 4.3.2022, p. 7.

(3)  OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 70, 4.3.2022, p. 1.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2795 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2795

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to submit a study on the 
 circumstances which may impact the effectiveness and availability of 
 first responders before, during, or after a terrorist threat or event.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2015

   Ms. Jackson Lee (for herself, Mr. Payne, Ms. Fudge, Ms. Kelly of 
    Illinois, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. Pascrell, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Larson of 
   Connecticut, Mr. Norcross, Mr. Castro of Texas, Mr. Gene Green of 
Texas, Ms. Bass, Ms. Lee, Mr. Hinojosa, and Mr. Pallone) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                                Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to submit a study on the 
 circumstances which may impact the effectiveness and availability of 
 first responders before, during, or after a terrorist threat or event.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``First Responder Identification of 
Emergency Needs in Disaster Situations'' or the ``FRIENDS Act''.

SEC. 2. CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY IMPACT FIRST RESPONDERS DURING A 
              TERRORIST EVENT.

    Not later than 260 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the Committee 
on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee 
on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report on 
factors that would result in first responders failing to meet 
expectations based upon training and planning for terrorist incidents. 
The report--
            (1) may include information on first responder performance 
        and availability before, during, or after a terrorist threat or 
        event; and
            (2) shall--
                    (A) include first responder input on how the 
                presence of family in the impacted area, the adequacy 
                of personal protective equipment, and training gaps may 
                influence performance and availability; and
                    (B) contain recommendations to the Committee on 
                Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and 
                the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                Affairs of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
#### KUCHENMEISTER et ux. v. W. J. WILLIAMS, Inc.

No. 11375.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

May 10, 1933.

*280Greenwood & Lewis, of Harlingen, for plaintiffs in error.

James H. Anderson, of Mercedes, for defendants in error.

MURRAY, Justice.

On a former day of this court we overruled plaintiffs in .error’s motion to file transcript in the above styled cause. Plaintiffs in error have filed a motion for a rehearing, insisting that we committed error in overruling their motion.

The transcript discloses that the court below rendered judgment on May 23, 1012. Plaintiffs in error filed their petition in error on December 24, 1932, more than six months after rendition of final judgment. Plaintiffs in error contend that final judgment was not entered upon the minutes by the clerk until June 25, 1032, and that the six-month period for filing petitions for writ of error (Rev. St. 1925, art. 2255) should be computed from the time the judgment is actually entered in the minutes by the clerk.

Texas Jurisprudence, Vol. 6, § 181, reads as followS:

“As has been seen, the statute regulating proceedings for review by the Court of Civil Appeals authorizes the suing out of a writ of error within six months after the final judgment is rendered. And it is held in an unbroken line of decisions that the time within which the writ may be sued out begins to run from the day of the rendition of the final judgment in'the court below, and not of a subsequent order, such as an order overruling a motion for new trial, or of an order on petition for bill of review filed pursuant to article 2236 of the Revised Statutes of 1925. The term-‘final judgment,’ as used in the statute refers to the,main judgment in the case— the judgment which completely disposes of both parties and subject matter. And the rendition of the judgment within the meaning. of the rule is the judicial act by which the court settles and declares the decision of the-law upon the matters at issue, and not the entry of judgment by the. clerk, or the adjournment of the court.

“■The term ‘final'judgnient,’ in the provision limiting the time for appeal, is used in the same sense as it is used in the statute relating to'/iff,its of erro.r,. A-motion for new trial, within the meaning-'of that provision, is any application to the court whereby it is asked t'o set aside-'the'judgment; whether or not thfe'judgriieri't be based oh verdict,'or whether the judgment disposed of the case on its merits.”

Numerous authorities are cited in the footnotes supporting the above text.

Plaintiffs in error’s motion to set aside our former judgment and for a rehearing are both overruled.
1

Mears, Gilbert

From: Lois Drumheller <l_drumheller@me.com>

Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 10:55 PM

To: Mears, Gilbert

Subject: Re: Docket #: EPA-HQ-TRI-2013-0281

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Mr. Gilbert Mears 

Toxics Release Inventory Program Division 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Dear Mr. Mears, 

I join many others today in asking the EPA to close the TRI loophole. Industries such as oil and gas should be as 

transparent as other industries when they inventory their materials of operations. In my field of health care, it is important 

to view medical data safety sheets. That is how I safely carry out duties as a respiratory therapist. That is inclusive in 

asthma education. The public should inventory their environment to control asthma. Industry should become transparent 

in this role. 

Persons living everywhere need the same transparency withe the discovery of what the oil and gas industry releases into 

our air, water and land. We are constitutionally guaranteed the right to clean air and water here in Pennsylvania. And so, 

the public's right to know fall under this same law. 

Please continue the EPA's important reporting to the public of toxics release inventory. 

Thank you, 

Lois Drumheller, RRT, AE-C 

200 Scott Drive 

Monroeville, PA 

l_drumheller@mac.com

412-374-0870
<PAGE>1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                              [KPMG LLP Letterhead]



                                Auditors' Consent



     The Board of Directors
     Payless Cashways, Inc.:


     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
     333-70557)  on Form S-8 of Payless  Cashways,  Inc.  of our  report,  dated
     January 15, 1999, relating to the balance sheets of Payless Cashways,  Inc.
     as of November 28, 1998 and November 29, 1997,  and the related  statements
     of operations,  stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal
     years in the  three-year  period ended  November 28, 1998,  and the related
     schedule,  which  report  appears in the November 28, 1998 annual report on
     Form 10-K of Payless Cashways, Inc. Our report refers to the application of
     fresh start  reporting  as of November 29,  1997.  In addition,  our report
     refers to the  Company's  adoption of  Statement  of  Financial  Accounting
     Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the  Impairment of  Long-Lived Assets to
     Be Disposed Of", in fiscal 1996.



                                                            /s/ KPMG LLP



     Kansas City, Missouri
     February 25, 1999
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 24, 2023 No. 04-22-00534-CR EX PARTE Sergio Misael MONSIVAIS AVITIA From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10431CR Honorable Dennis Powell, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Pending before the court is appellant’s request to file supplemental briefing. We hereby GRANT appellant’s request and ORDER that appellant’s supplemented appellant’s brief is accepted as filed. It is ORDERED that the State may file a brief in response to appellant’s supplemented appellant’s brief within twenty days of the date of this order.
It is so ORDERED on January 24, 2023. PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT
EXHIBIT 11

SPARTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
                                        
                                                     Fiscal Year Ended

                                                   Nov 1,     Nov 2,    Oct 28,
                                                     1997       1996      1995
NET EARNINGS
   Net earnings                                    $25,493   $18,317   $14,534
   Preferred stock accretion/requirements                -         -    (1,098)
   Primary net earnings applicable to common 
   shares and equivalents                           25,493    18,317    13,436
    Add: Preferred stock dividend accretion 
         reduction resulting from the 
        assumed conversion of the preferred stock        -         -     1,098

   Fully diluted net earnings applicable to common 
   shares                                         $ 25,493   $ 18,317 $ 14,534

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
    Weighted average common shares outstanding      26,418     23,714   15,956

     Add: Shares issuable from assumed exercise of 
          options and warrants                       1,512      1,158      902
     Primary weighted average common shares 
     outstanding                                    27,930     24,872   16,858
      Add: Shares issuable from assumed 
           conversion of preferred stock                 -          -    7,137
      Add: Additional shares issuable from assumed 
           exercise of options and 
           warrants due to the difference in the 
           share repurchase price under the 
           fully diluted computation                  201        243       116

   Fully diluted weighted average common shares 
    outstanding                                    28,131     25,115    24,111

NET EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
   Primary                                          $ .91        $.74     $.80
   Fully Diluted                                     $.91        $.73     $.60
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements:(1) Registration Statement (Form S-3 Number 333-109682) of Spartech Corporation and Subsidiaries,and (2) Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-61322, 333-60316, 333-60381, 333-30878, 333-113752)of Spartech Corporation and Subsidiariesof our reports dated December 15, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedules of Spartech Corporation and Subsidiaries, Spartech Corporation and Subsidiariesmanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Spartech Corporation andSubsidiaries, included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 28, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPSt. Louis, Missouri
Exhibit (23)

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 and S-8 (Nos. 33-9563,33-9986, 33-18262, 33-20997, 33-27209, 33-31687, 33-48707, 33-57886, 33-60487, 333-09367, 333-47961, 333-48153, 333-76715, 333-76717, 333-76765, 333-40818 and 333-40824) of Owens Corning of our report dated February 4, 2004 relating to the financialstatements, which appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 4, 2004 relating to the financial statement schedule for each of the two years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, whichappears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

Toledo, Ohio

February 20, 2004
**PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES**
Exhibit 11             **COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS**  (in millions except per share data)          For the years ended  December 31,  2003 2002 2001Net income (loss) before extraordinary item and cumulativeeffect of accounting change $18.1   (315.2)  (329.5)Extraordinary gain  68.3   —   — Cumulative effect of accounting change (1)  8.4   (22.9)  (2.0)             Net income (loss) $94.8   (338.1)  (331.5)Preferred stock dividends  (13.5)  (9.1)  —              Net income (loss) applicable to common shares $81.3   (347.2)  (331.5)             Basic:            Average number of common shares outstanding  88.8   84.1   78.5 Diluted:            Average number of common shares outstanding  88.8   84.1   78.5 Common stock equivalents — stock options  0.4   —   — Common stock equivalents — restricted stock  0.2   0.3   0.2 Conversion of mandatory convertible preferred stock  4.7   2.8   —              Diluted average number of common shares outstanding (2)  94.1   87.2   78.7 Basic earnings (loss) per share:            Loss before extraordinary gain and cumulativeeffect of accounting change $0.06   (3.86)  (4.19)Extraordinary gain  0.77   —   — Cumulative effect of accounting change (1)  0.09   (0.27)  (0.03)             Basic earnings (loss) per share $0.92   (4.13)  (4.22)             Diluted earnings (loss) per share:            Net income (loss) before extraordinary loss and cumulativeeffect of accounting change $0.06   (3.86)  (4.19)Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt  0.76   —   — Cumulative effect of accounting change (1)  0.09   (0.27)  (0.03)             Diluted earnings (loss) per share (2) $0.91   (4.13)  (4.22)             
(1) The year ended December 31, 2003, included adoption of SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations;”the year ended December 31, 2002, included adoption of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets;” and theyear ended December 31, 2001, included adoption of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments andHedging Activities,” (as amended by SFAS No. 137) and SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instrumentsand Certain Hedging Activities.” (2) The incremental shares associated with the assumed conversion of the mandatory convertible preferred shares tocommon shares were excluded from the December 31, 2003, diluted earnings per share calculation as the impactwould have been anti-dilutive. The incremental shares associated with stock options, restricted stock and the assumedconversion of the mandatory convertible preferred shares (2002 only) to common shares were excluded from the dilutedloss per share calculation for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, as their impact would havebeen anti-dilutive.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CAFETERIA
OPERATORS, L.P. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER
28, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1999
<CASH>                                           6,373
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,143
<ALLOWANCES>                                        17
<INVENTORY>                                      6,990
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,576
<PP&E>                                         111,897
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,426
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,851
<BONDS>                                         57,966
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (23,234)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,286
<SALES>                                        140,987
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               140,987
<CGS>                                           42,164
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,290
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,301
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,301
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,301
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15-1312V Filed: October 17, 2016

UNPUBLISHED

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ALICE MULLE, *

* Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer; v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder * Injury Related to Vaccine Administration SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA ”); Special Processing Unit AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”)

* Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. Jennifer Leigh Reynaud, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

Dorsey , Chief Special Master:

On November 3, 2015, Alice Mulle (“pet itioner”) filed a petit ion for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Com pensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et

seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine she receiv ed on December 5, 2014. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processi ng Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On October 14, 2016, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer on Damages (“Rule 4/Proffer”) indicating petit ioner should be awarded $65,000.00. Rule

4/Proffer at 3. In the Pr offer, respondent represented t hat petitioner agrees with the proffered award. On October 17, 2016, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation. Bas ed on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an aw ard as stated in the Rule 4/Proffer.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Cour t of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, t he undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Ac t will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 Pursuant to the terms stat ed in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $65,000. 00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Alice Mulle. This amount represents compens ation for all damages that

would be available un der § 300aa-15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this

decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment c an be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.