### 1

July 8th , 201 5 U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations from 14 CFR : Part 21 subpart H ; 45.23(b); 61.113 (a) & (b); 91.7(a); 91.9(b) (2); 91.1 03 (b); 91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.203(a) & (b); 91.405 (a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2); 91.417 (a) & (b).

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization a nd Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Dynegy Inc, an electric utility company, hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARS”) to allow commercial operation of its small Unmanned Aircraft System (“sUAS”) for aerial inspection of power plant facilities owned by subsidiaries of Dynegy Inc. , which are secure and controlled sites, so long as operations a re conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333.

As detailed in this document, t he requested exemption would perm it the operation of sUAS under

con trolled conditions in airspace that is 1) limited 2) predetermined 3) controlled as to access and 4) would provide safety enhancem ents to the safety protocols already followed by Dynegy at each of its power plant sites. Approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of Transportation’s (the FAA Administrator’s ) responsibilities to “...establish requ irements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace syste m.” Section 333(c) of the Reform Act.

The name and address of the applicant is: Dynegy Incorporated 1500 Eastport Plaza Drive Collinsville, IL 62234
Matthew C. Rains

PH: 6 18

- 343

- 7764
Email: matthew.rains@dynegy.com

Regulations from which the exemption is requested:

14 C.F.R. Part 21 subpart H

14 C.F.R. 45.23 (b)

14 C.F.R. 61.113 (a) & (b)

14 C.F.R. 91.7 (a)

14 C.F.R. 91.9 (b) (2)

14 C.F.R. 91.103

14 C.F.R. 91.109

14 C.F.R. 91.119 14 C.F.R. 91.121 14 C.F.R 91.151 (a)

14 C.F.R. 91.203 (a) & (b)

14 C.F.R. 91.405 (a)

14 C.F.R. 91. 407 (a) (1)

14 C.F.R. 91. 409 (a) (2)

14 C.F.R. 91. 417 (a) & (b)

### 2



### I. STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR EXEMPTIONS

The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA authority to issue exemption s. This statutory authority includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is defined under §40101 of the Act, including sUASs, from the requirement that all civil aircraft must have a current airworthiness certificate.

The Administrator may grant an exemption from a requirement of a regulation prescribed un der subsection (a) or (b) of this section or any sections 44702

- 44716 of this title if the Administrator finds the exemption in the public interest. 49 U.S.C. §44701(f) See also 49 USC §44711(a); 49 USC §44704; 14
CFR §91.203(a) (1).

Section 333(b) of the Reform Act assists the Secretary in determining whether s UAS may operate in the National Airspace System (NAS) without creating a hazard to the user, the public, or a threat to

national security. In making this determination, the Secr etary must consider:

 The sUAS’s size, weight, speed, and operational capability

 Whether the sUAS operates within the visual line of sight of the operator

 Whether the sUAS operates outside of highly populated areas and away from close proximity to airports Reform Act §333(a). If the Secretary determines that a sUAS “may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft in the national airspace system.” Id. §333(c).

Dynegy’s sUAS is a DJI Inspire One

, multirotor vehicle, weighing 10 or fewer lbs. including payload. It operate s under normal conditions at a speed of no more than 50 knots and has the capability

to hover and move in the vertical and horizontal plane simultaneously . The s UAS will operate only in the pilot’s visual line of sight at all times and will operate within the property boundaries of any Dynegy power plant. See attached Exhibit 1 for a complete list of applicable properties

. Dynegy intends to implement

opera ting controls which will insure that the sUAS will “not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public.” Reform Act Section 333 (b).

Given the nature of power plant inspections, stacks can range from less than 300’ AGL to 1000’ AGL. Visual inspection of these stacks are required every three years at most, but often annual inspections are required. Dynegy has over 50 stacks which could l ead to 15 inspections a year. Stack inspections are always high risk tasks given the height and environmental factors required for an “eyes on” inspection. Dynegy believes it is in the public’s best interest to greatly reduce the number of inspections perf ormed by employees and replace the inherent danger with our sUAS.

Dynegy does possess power plants which are located within 5 NM of airports, within populated areas as defined on FAA sectionals, and has direct need to fly the sUAS above 4 00’AGL only for t he power plant exhaust stack external inspections . However, Dynegy has the authority to manage all personnel within its property boundaries and during any aerial inspection by the sUAS, all personnel will be 1) made fully aware of the inspection and 2) cle ared from the area unless operations dictate otherwise. Dynegy will NOT fly above 4 00’AGL outside of Dynegy property boundaries. Any flight not in Class G airspace will be done with a VHF aviation radio with contact and radio calls made to the appropriate Control Tower or CTAF as applicable. No flight will be performed where a Mode C Transponder is required unless explicit permission from local Class B or Class C Control Tower has been issued.

### 3 Based on the small size of the sUAS involved

, the controlled b oundaries of each power plant within which they will operate, and complete control of minimal population of personnel which will be below the flight path, Dynegy’s application falls squarely within the level of safety in which Congress

envisioned that the FAA may , by exemption, allow commercial operations of sUAS to commence immediately.

Given the clear direction in Section 333 of the Reform Act, the authority contained in the Federal Aviation Act, as amended; the st r ong equivalent level of safety surrounding the proposed operations, and

the significant public benefit, including enhanced safety, the grant of the requested exemptions is in the public interest. Accordingly , Dynegy Inc respectfully requests that the FAA g rant the requested exemption without delay.



### II. PUBLIC INTEREST

This exemption application is expressly submitted to fulfill Congress’ goal in passing Section 333(a) through (c) of the Reform Act. This law directs the Secretary of Transportation to consider whether certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the NAS before completion of the rulemaking required under Section 332 of the Reform Act. By granting an exemption

, the FAA will fulfill Congress’s intent of allowing UAS to operate w ith significant safety precautions in low risk environments.

The use of s UAS on a power plant site can significantly reduce the risk to workers of falls while inspecting, surveying, or monitoring site facilities

. Small UAS can inspect, photograph, and collect data on

hard to access areas that otherwise would require employee or contractor inspection s . Falls are always a major concern when working at power plant sites

, and reducing the potential of falls through s UAS use for

site imaging and inspections will minimize the number of potential hazards from elevated locations

.

Finally , sUAS will aid in reducing the environmental impact of power plants. By visually inspecting
areas difficult to access more regularly and with a wider range of views, overall plant efficiency will be improved. Improved plant efficiency dramatically decreases amount of carbon and waste required to produce the same amount of power. The long term returns from this reduction of resources and resultant waste will greatly benefit the environment. Additionally, the current energy use for facility inspection, aerial imaging and data collection over a plant site requires a distinctly greater amount of resources and power compared t o a s UAS which uses use rec hargeable lithium ion batteries as opposed to fossil fuels.

Due to the significantly reduced situations which current employees and contractors work in dangerous locations to inspect plant facilities, the decreased environmenta l footprint which can be achieved through plant efficiencies gained by more thorough inspections, and the reduced energy cost to perform such inspections, Dynegy requests the FAA accept these factors as adequate for evidence of benefits to the public secto rs by granting this exemption application.



### III. EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY

Dynegy proposes that the exemption requested herein apply to sUAS that have the

characteristics and that operate with the limitations listed herein. These limitations provide for at least an equivalent or even higher level of safety to operations under the current regulatory structure because the proposed operations represent a safety enhancement to the already safe protocols followed on

construction sites and imaging and surveying operations conducted with helicopters and other
conventional aircraft.

### 4

Dynegy will be bound by the following limitations when conducting its s UAS operations under an FAA issued exemption:

1. The sUAS will be less than 10 pounds.

2. Flights will be operated wit hin visual line of sight of a pilot.

3. Maximum total flight time for each operational flight will be 30 minutes. The UAS calculates battery reserve in real time, and will return to its ground station with at least 20% battery power

reserve should that occur pr ior to the 30 minute limit.

4. Flights will typically be operated below an altitude of 4 00 feet AGL. However, some facility inspections of power plants will require flight up to 10 00’ AGL. These inspections will be for the exhaust stacks which are inherently designated dangerous a irspace to manned aircraft

. Sectionals with plant locations plotted are available upon request due to total file size.

5. Crew for each operation will consis t of the sUAS Pilot who will keep the sUAS within visual line of sight at all times. An additional Visual Observer / Camera Crew

- M ember may be involved, but is not required for safe flight.

6. The sUAS Pilot will be trained in flight, operations, and safety pr ocedures.

7. The sUAS will only operate within the boundaries of a Dynegy owned and operated utility power

station property

. This includes enclosed structures, exhaust stacks, coal yards, ash ponds, and cooling water sources if located on Dynegy property.

8. A briefing will be conducted in regard to the planned sUAS operations prior to each day’s production activities. Personnel performing duties within the area of the flight plan will receive a safety briefing and ensure personnel are cleared from areas below f light paths as practical unless essential to plant operations.

9. Pilot will have been trained in operation of UASs generally and received up

- to

- date information on the particular UAS to be operated.

10. All required permissions and permits will be obtained from territorial, state, county or city jurisdictions, including local law enforcement, fire, or other appropriate governmental agencies.

11. Dynegy agrees that in the event of any mishap in the Nation al Airspace System, the event will be reported to the FAA as soon as practicable once safety has been ensured.

12. If the sUAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it will have capability to enter “loiter

mode” and hover, reestablish satellite connection, and return to a pre

- determined location within

the prop erty boundary and land in a safe zone

. 13. Flights will not be performed in areas which require a transponder.

************

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the Federal Register,

should it be determined that publication is needed:

Applicant seeks an exemption from the following rules: 14 C.F.R. §21, subpart H; 14 C.F.R 45.23(b);14
C.F.R. §§ 61.113( a) & (b);9 1 .7 (a); 91.9 (b) (2);91.103(b);91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a);91.203(a) and (b); 91.405 (a); 91.407 (a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2); 91.409 (a) (2) and 91.417 (a) & (b) to operate commercially a small unmanned vehicle (55lbs or less) in construction operations.

Approval of exemptions allowing commercial operations of sUAS in the power utility industry enhances safety while reducing risk. A sUAS weighing fewer than 10 lbs. and powered by batteries eliminates virtually all risk inherent to elevated visual inspections on facilities and structural components of a power plant.

The operation of s U AS, weighing less than 10 lbs., conducted in the strict conditions outlined above, will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant of the exemptions requested herein, including

### 5

exempting the applicant from the requirements of Part 21 and al lowing commercial operations. These lightweight aircraft operate at slow speeds, close to the ground, and in a sterile environment and, as a result, are far safer than conventional operations conducted with turbine helicopters operating in close proximity to the ground and people.



### Privacy

All flights will occur over private or controlled access property with the property owner’s prior consent and knowledge. Images taken will be of individuals who have also consent ed to being filmed or otherwise

have agreed to be in the area where aerial photography will take place.

**************

Satisfaction of the criteria provided in Section 333 o f the Reform Act of 20l2

- size, weight, speed, operating capabilities, proximity to airports and populated areas and operation within visual line of sight and national security

- provide more than adequate justification for the grant of the requested exemptions allowing commercial operation of applicant’s s UAS in electric power plant use for inspections, photographic im agery, and surveying Dynegy owned property and structures

.

DJI Inspire One Owner’s Manual with pre

- flight checklist http://download.dji

- innovations.com/downloads/inspire_1/en/Inspire_1_User_Manual_v1.2_en.pdf

DJI Inspire One Maintenance Manual http://download.dji

- innovations.com/downloads/inspire_1/en/Inspire_1_Maintenance_ManualV1.0_en.pdf

DJI’s Website resource to locate NO FLY ZONEs near your current location: http://www.dji.com/fly

- saf e/category

- mc

### 6 

### APPENDIX A: DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC REGULATION S

14 CFR Part 21 subpart H: Airworthiness Certificates Section 91.203 requires all civil aircraft to have a certificate of airworthiness. Part 21, Subpart H,

entitled Airworthiness Certificates, establishes the procedural requirements for the issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by FAR § 91.203(a). Given the size of the sUAS, its light weight, and the limited operating area associated with its utilization, it is unnecessary to go through the certificate of airworthiness process under Part 21 Subpart H in order to achieve or exceed current safety levels. Such an exemption meets the requirements of an equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and
Section 333 o f the Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act and Section 333 of the Reform Act both authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an airworthiness certificate, upon consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational capability, and proximi ty to airports and populated areas of the sUAS involved. An analysis of these different criteria demonstrates that the sUAS operated without an airworthiness certificate, under the conditions proposed in that exemption, will be at least as safe, or safer, than a conventional aircraft with an airworthiness certificate.

14 CFR 45.23 (b) : Display of marks; general When marks include only the Roman capital letter "N" and the registration number is displayed on limited, restricted or light

- sport category airc raft or experimental or provisionally certificated aircraft, the operator must also display on that aircraft near each entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches nor more than 6 inches high, the words "limited," "restricted," "light

- sport," "experimental," or "provisional," as applicable. Even though the UAS will have no airworthiness certificate, an exemption may be needed as the UAS will have no entrance to the cabin, cockpit or pilot station on

which the word “ Experimental” can be placed. Given the size of the sUAV, two

- inch lettering will be impossible. Dynegy is seeking relief from the requirement of marking the sUAS given the small fuselage siding does not offer enough space to mark “Experimental” and have it legible from ground view

. The equivalent level of safety will be provided by having the sUAV controlled within the Dynegy property boundary only with the pilot/controller available and within Line of Sight at all times. The FAA has issued the following ex emptions to this regulation to Exemptions Nos. 10700, 8738, 10167 and 10167A.

14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b): Private pilot privileges and limitations:
Pilot in command Sections 61.113 (a) & (b) limit private pilots to non

- commercial operations.
Because the sUA S will not carry a pilot or passengers, the proposed operations can achieve the equivalent level of safety of current operations by requiring the Pilot operating the aircraft to have completed a sUAS flight training course of 100 hours before flying a s UAS. Unlike a conventional aircraft that carries the pilot and passengers, the sUAS is remotely controlled with no living thing or cargo on

board. Dynegy ’s sUAS has back

- up autopilot systems with a return

- to

- base option which greatly reduces the danger of huma n error. The area of operation will be controlled and restricted to hard hat areas. A ll flights will be planned and coordinated in advance. The sUAS to be operated hereunder is less than 10 lbs. fully loaded, carries neither a pilot nor passenger, carries no explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, a nd operates exclusively within controlled area s. Like other civil aircraft, operations under this exemption will be tightly controlled and monitored by the operator and in compliance with l ocal public
safet y requirements

.

The risks associated with the operation of the sUAS are therefore diminished from the level of risk associated with commercial operations contemplated by Part 61 when drafted, and allowing operations of
the sUAS as requested with a Pilot who has met the level of safety contemplated by 14 C.F.R. §61.113 (a) & (b).

### 7

14 CFR 91.7 (a) : Civil aircraft airworthiness The regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in airworthy

condition. As there will be no airworthiness certificate issued for the aircraft, should this exemption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard will exist for determining airworthiness. Given the size of the aircraft and the requirements contained in the DJI Owner’s Manual for maintenanc e and use of safety check lists prior to each flight, an equivalent level of safety will be provided.

14 CFR 91.9 (b) (2): Civil aircraft flight manual, marking, and placard requirements This regulation provides that no person may operate an aircraft unl ess a current, approved flight
manual is in the aircraft. Dynegy proposes to provide an equivalent level of safety by maintaining a copy of all documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS as well as
documentation of an exemption and COA with the ground control station and accessible to the PIC during flight operations.

14 C.F.R. 91.103: Preflight Action This regulation requires each pilot in command take certain actions before flight to ensure the safety of flight. An exemption is needed from this requirement as the Pilot will take separate preflight actions, including checking for weather conditions, checking fl ight battery requirements, checking takeoff and landing distances, and all other actions in a sUAV Preflight Checklist

. These actions will provide an equivalent level of safety.

14 C.F. R. 91.1 09: Flight instruction The regulation provides that "No person may operate a civil aircraft that is being used for flight
instruction unless that aircraft has f ully functioning dual controls." The equivalent level of safety will be achieved through Dynegy’s sUAS flight training program and conducting flight training within controlled environments.

14 C.F. R. 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes
Section 91.119 establis hes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91.119 ((1) allows helicopters to be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided the person operating the helicopter complies with any route or altitudes prescribed for helicopters by the FAA. This exemption is for
a multirotor craft that flies similarly to a helicopter, with vertical take off and vertical landing, which will typically operate at altitudes of 200 ’ AGL, so an exemption may be needed to allow such operations. The
sUAS will never operate at altitude higher than 4 00 ’ AGL unless explicit approval from the FAA and local ATC has been granted and only then for exhaust and plant inspections within the Dynegy power plant boundaries. Flights will be in a restricted area with security perimeter, where buildings and people will not be exposed to operations without their pre

— obtained consent. The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, speed of the sUAS as well

as the location where it is operated. No fl ight will be taken without the permission of the property owner or local officials. Because of the advance notice to the property owner and any onsite personnel, all affected

individuals will be aware of the planned flight operations. Unlike flight operations wit h aircraft or rotorcraft weighing far more than the maximum 10 lbs. proposed herein, our sUAS will not carry flammable fuel. In addition, the low

— altitude operations of the sUAS will ensure separation between SUAS operations and the operations of convention al aircraft that must comply with Section 91.119.

14 C.F.R. 91.121: Altimeter Settings This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by
reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.” As the sUAS may not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a GPS

### 8

altitude read out, an exemption may be needed. An equivalent level of safety wi ll be achieved by the operator and Sa fety Check list, confirming the altitude of the launch site shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight.

14 CFR 91.151 (a): Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions
Section 91.151 (a) outlines fuel requirements for beginning a flight in VFR conditions. Dynegy’s sUAS is limited to operations in controll ed environments , and has a limited range and flight time which require an exemption from 14 CFR 91.151(a). The battery powering the SUA S provides approximately 20 minutes of powered flight. To meet the 30 minute reserve requirement in 14 CFR §91.151, sUAS fl ights
would not be feasible to even lift

- off . Given the immediate proximity of flight to landing zone, Dynegy requests an exemption to establish a 20% battery remaining or 5 minutes of flight time remaining for
minimum fuel restrictions. Dynegy believes that an exemption from 14 CFR §91.151(a) falls within the scope of prior exemptions. Operating the small sUAS, in a tightly controlled a rea where only people and property owners or official representatives who have signed waivers will be allowed, with less than 30 minutes of reserve fuel, does not endanger the type of risks that Section 91 .151(a) was intended to alleviate given

the size a nd speed of the small UAS. An equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights to 20 minutes, or enough battery

reserve to ensure that the sUAS lands at the ground station with at least 20% of battery power (as determined by the onboard monit oring system and the Pilot), whichever happens first. This restriction would be more than adequate to return the sUAS to its planned landing zone from anywhere in its limited operating area.

14 CFR 91. 203 (a) & (b): Carrying civil aircraft certification and registration This regulation provides as follows: • No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has an appropriate and current airworthiness
certificate. • No person may operate a civil aircraft unless t he airworthiness certificate required by paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued under §91.715 is displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to passengers or crew. To obtain an equivalent level of safet y and meet the intent of 91.203, Dynegy proposes to
maintain a copy of all documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the sUAS as well as documentation of an exemption and COA with the ground control station and these will be available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

14 CFR 91.405 (a); 407 (a)(1); 409 (a)(2); 417 (a) & (b): Maintenance inspections These regulations require that an aircraft operator or owner “shall have that aircraft inspect ed as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter...,” and

others shall inspect or maintain the aircr aft in compliance with Part 43.
Given that these sections and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, these sections will not apply to Dynegy . Maintenance will be accomplished by the operator pursuant to the
manufacturer’s fl ight m anual and operating handbook. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved
because these small sUAS are very limited in size, will carry a small payload and operate only in restricted areas for limited periods of time. If mechanical issues arise

, the sUAS can land immediately within the boundaries of a Dynegy owned property

. The Pilot will ensure that the s UAS is in working order prior to initiating flight, perform required maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the Pilot is the person most familiar with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition to provide the equivalent level of safety.Map # Plant Name Nearest Town Stack Ht Airspace Min Max Airport Radio Freq Mode C

1 Baldwin Energy Complex Baldwin, IL 350' AGL Class G SFC 1200' AGL SAR CTAF 123.075

10 Casco Bay Veazie, ME <400' AGL Class C SFC 4200' MSL BGR CT 120.700 X
1, 2, 4 Coffeen Coffeen, IL 600' AGL Class G SFC 1200' AGL VLA CTAF 122.800

9 Conesville Station Conesville, OH 800' AGL Class G SFC 1200' AGL I40 CTAF 123.000

Class G SFC 700' AGL CVG CT 118.300

Class E 700' AGL FLT LVL MWO CTAF 123.000
12, 19 Dighton Power Dighton, MA <400' AGL Class G SFC 1200' AGL TAN CTAF 122.700

Class G SFC 700' AGL PIA CT 124.000

Class E 700' AGL FLT LVL CTK CTAF 122.800

MOA 9000' MSL FLT LVL Kansas City CNTR 127.270
5, 6 Edwards Peoria, IL 500' AGL Class C SFC 4700' MSL PIA CT 124.000 X

Class G SFC 700' AGL JOT CTAF 122.700

Class E 700' AGL FLT LVL ORD CT 120.750

Class G SFC 700' AGL WAY CTAF 122.800

Class E 700' AGL FLT LVL MGW CT 125.100

Class G SFC 700' AGL DWU CTAF 122.800

Class E 700' AGL FLT LVL Huntington TRSA 128.400

5 Havana Havana, IL 500' AGL Class G SFC 1200' AGL 9I0 CTAF 122.900
6, 17 Hennepin Hennepin, IL 275' AGL Class G SFC 1200' AGL VYS CTAF 123.000

16 Independence Oswego, NY <400' AGL Class G SFC 1200' AGL FZY CTAF 123.000

3 Joppa Metropolis, IL 550' AGL Class G SFC 1200' AGL M30 CTAF 122.800

Class G SFC 700' AGL JOT CTAF 122.700

Class E 700' AGL FLT LVL ORD CT 120.750
8, 15 Killen Wrightsville, OH 900' AGL Class G SFC 1200' AGL AMT CTAF 122.800

4 Kincaid Generation Kincaid, IL 650' AGL Class G SFC 1200' AGL TAZ CTAF 122.800

Class G SFC 700' AGL

Class E 700' AGL FLT LVL

Class G SFC 700' AGL

Class E 700' AGL FLT LVL
18, 18a Liberty Electric Power Philadelphia, PA 256' AGL Class B SFC 7000' MSL PHL CT 118.200 X

Class D SFC 2700' MSL CT 134.850

Class E 2700' MSL FLT LVL CTAF 122.950

Class G SFC 700' AGL CT 118.300

Class E 700' AGL 2100' MSL CTAF 122.950

Class B 2100' MSL FLT LVL I67 CTAF 123.000

Class D SFC 2500' MSL CT 133.600

Class E 2500' MSL FLT LVL CTAF 123.000

CT 124.000

CTAF 122.950

Class G SFC 700' AGL WVI CTAF 122.800

Class E 700' AGL FLT LVL MRY CT 118.400

2 Newton Effingham, IL 530' AGL Class G SFC 1200' AGL 1H2 CTAF 122.800

Class G SFC 700' AGL SFO CTAF 122.950

Class E 700' AGL 1500' MSL Norcal APP 125.350

Class C 1500' MSL 3000' MSL OAK CT 118.300

Class B 3000'MSL FLT LVL SFO CT 120.500

24 Ontelaunee Reading, PA 400' AGL Class D SFC 2800' MSL RDG CT 119.900

Class G SFC 700' AGL DFI CTAF 122.700

Class E 700' AGL FLT LVL 0G6 CTAF 122.800

Class G SFC 700' AGL 0G6 CTAF 122.800

Class E 700' AGL FLT LVL DFI CTAF 122.700
8, 15 Stuart Washington, OH 800' AGL Class G SFC 1200' AGL FGX CTAF 123.000

26 Washington Energy Beverly, OH <400' AGL Class G SFC 1200' AGL I71 CTAF 122.800

Class D SFC 3000' MSL ALN CT 126.000

Class E 3000' MSL 5000' MSL STL CTAF 122.950

Class B 5000' MSL 8000' MSL STL CT 118.500

I69 CTAF 122.975

K62 CTAF 122.700

CVG CT 118.300 Moscow, OH Zimmer 7, 8 

## Dynegy Power Plant Airspace Information

20 JUNE 2015

X 1200' AGL SFC Class G 500' AGL 1 Wood River Alton, IL 350' AGL X Defiance, OH <400' AGL

25 Stryker Facility Stryker, OH <400'AGL 12, 19

7

21

25 Richland Facility 13, 17 14 5 11

13, 17

15

23, 23a 22 20 19 17

500' AGL Monterey Bay, CA Moss Landing

Oakland Power Station Oakland, CA 300' AGL X X Dicks Creek Combustion

Turbine Site Middletown, OH <400' AGL

Duck Creek Canton, IL 600' AGL

Elwood Energy Joliet, IL <400' AGL

<400' AGL Masontown, PA Fayette Energy Facility

<400' AGL Ironton, OH Hanging Rock Energy Facility

Joliet, IL <400' AGL Kendall

Lake Road Generating Dayville, CT <400' AGL LZD CTAF 123.000

Lee Energy Facility

Masspower Springfield, MA <400' AGL CEF 123.050 CTAF C73 <400' AGL Dixon, IL

X CVG 400' AGL Cincinnati, OH Miami Fort

BDR Milford Power Milford, CT <400' AGL

1200' AGL SBP Morro Bay San Luis Obispo, CA 450' AGL Class G SFCU.S. Department

of Transportation


### Federal Aviation Administration Flight Standards Service Airmen Certification Branch, AFS

- 760 P.O. Box 25082 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73125

- 0082 WEB Address: http://registry.faa.gov

Sincerely,

5RELQ07KXUPDQ Manager, Airmen Certification Branch