Notices regarding the solicitation “NIJ FY22 Evaluation of OJP CommunityBased

Violence Interventionand Prevention Initiative (CVIPI) Projects” 

May 18, 2022: FAQs from the associated solicitation webinar added to the funding detail page.

April 20, 2022: The Grants.gov Opportunity Number for this solicitation has changed from 

O-NIJ-2019-171279 to O-NIJ-2022-171279.

The original funding opportunity document begins on the next page.
OMB No. 1121-0329 

Approval Expires  12/31/2023 

U.S. Department of Justice 

Office of Justice Programs 

National Institute of Justice 

NIJ FY22 Evaluation of OJP Community Based Violence Intervention and Prevention 

Initiative (CVIPI) Projects 

Assistance Listing Number # 

Grants.gov Opportunity Number: 

Solicitation Release Date: 

Version: 

Grants.gov Deadline: 

Application JustGrants Deadline: 

16.045 

O-NIJ-2022-171279

April 19, 2022 2:00 PM 

6

June 07, 2022 11:59 PM 

June 21, 2022 8:59 PM 

Overview 

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), National Institute of Justice (NIJ), 

seeks applications for independent, rigorous evaluations of projects funded under the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 OJP 

Community Based Violence Intervention and Prevention Initiative (CVIPI) solicitation. More specifically, NIJ seeks 

to fund outcome and impact evaluations of Expansion and Enhancement projects, as defined under Categories 3 

and 4 of the OJP solicitation. Evaluations should also examine questions regarding program implementation (e.g., 

process evaluation). This program furthers the DOJ’s mission by supporting the development of new knowledge 

and tools to address the challenges of crime and justice in the United States. 

This solicitation incorporates the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide by reference. The OJP Grant 

Application Resource Guide provides guidance to applicants for the preparation and submission to OJP of 

applications for funding. If this solicitation expressly modifies any provision in the OJP Grant Application 

Resource Guide, the applicant is to follow the guidelines in this solicitation as to that provision. 

Solicitation Categories 

This solicitation does not include Solicitation Categories. 

Eligible Applicants: 

City or township governments, County governments, For profit organizations other than small businesses, 

Independent school districts, Native American tribal governments (Federally recognized), Native American tribal 

organizations (other than Federally recognized tribal governments), Nonprofits having a 501(c)(3) status with the 

IRS, other than institutions of higher education, Nonprofits that do not have a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other 

than institutions of higher education, Private institutions of higher education, Public and State controlled 

institutions of higher education, Public housing authorities/Indian housing authorities, Small businesses, Special 

district governments, State governments, Other 

Other 

For purposes of this solicitation, “state” means any state of the United States, the District of Columbia, the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the 

Northern Mariana Islands. 

To be considered eligible under this solicitation, all applicants must document with a signed memorandum of 

understanding or letter of support that they are cooperating with an entity that will submit an application as an 

Expansion and Enhancement project site under the FY 2022 OJP Community Based Violence Intervention and 

Page 1 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
Prevention Initiative solicitation, Categories 3 and 4. 

To advance Executive Order 13929 Safe Policing for Safe Communities, the Attorney General determined that all 

state, local, and university or college law enforcement agencies must be certified by an approved independent 

credentialing body or have started the certification process to be eligible for FY 2022 DOJ discretionary grant 

funding. To become certified, the law enforcement agency must meet two mandatory conditions: (1) the agency’s 

use-of-force policies adhere to all applicable federal, state, and local laws and (2) the agency’s use-of-force 

policies prohibit chokeholds except in situations where use of deadly force is allowed by law. The certification 

requirement also applies to law enforcement agencies receiving DOJ discretionary grant funding through a 

subaward. For detailed information on this certification requirement, please visit 

https://cops.usdoj.gov/SafePolicingEO to access the Standards for Certification on Safe Policing for Safe 

Communities, the Implementation Fact Sheet, and the List of Designated Independent Credentialing Bodies 

Foreign governments, foreign organizations, and foreign colleges and universities are not eligible to apply. 

Federal agencies are eligible to apply. (Any award made to a federal agency will be made as an inter-agency 

reimbursable agreement.) 

All recipients and subrecipients (including any for-profit organization) must forgo any profit or management fee. 

NIJ will consider applications under which two or more entities would carry out the federal award; however, only 

one entity may be the applicant. Any others must be proposed as subrecipients (subgrantees). For additional 

information on subawards, see the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. 

NIJ may elect to fund applications submitted under this FY 2022 solicitation in future fiscal years, dependent on, 

among other considerations, the merit of the applications and on the availability of appropriations. 

Contact Information 

For technical assistance with submitting the Application for Federal Assistance standard form (SF)-424 and a 

Disclosure of Lobbying Activities form (SF-LLL) in Grants.gov, contact the Grants.gov Customer Support Hotline 

at 800-518-4726, 606-545-5035, Grants.gov Customer Support, or support@grants.gov. The Grants.gov Support 

Hotline operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, except on federal holidays. 

For technical assistance with submitting the full application in DOJ's Justice Grants System (JustGrants), contact 

the JustGrants Service Desk at 833-872-5175 or JustGrants.Support@usdoj.gov. The JustGrants Service Desk 

operates 5 a.m. to 9 p.m. eastern time Monday-Friday and 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturday, Sunday, and Federal 

holidays. 

For assistance with any other requirements of this solicitation, contact the OJP Response Center by telephone at 

800-851-3420 or TTY: 301-240-6310 (hearing impaired only), or by email at grants@ncjrs.gov. The OJP

Response Center hours of operation are 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., eastern time Monday–Friday, and 10:00 a.m. to 

8:00 p.m. on the solicitation closing date.

Submission Information 

Applications will be submitted to DOJ in two steps: 

Step 1: The applicant must submit by the Grants.gov deadline the required Application for Federal Assistance 

standard form (SF)-424 and a Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL) form when they register in Grants.gov 

at https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/register.html. To register in Grants.gov, the applicant will need to ensure 

that its System for Award Management (SAM) registration is current. 

Step 2: The applicant must then submit the full application, including attachments, in JustGrants at 

JustGrants.usdoj.gov. To be considered timely, the full application must be submitted in JustGrants by the 

JustGrants application deadline. OJP encourages applicants to review the “How to Apply” section in the OJP 

Grant Application Resource Guide and the JustGrants website for more information, resources, and training. 

Page 2 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
Contents 

Contact Information 2 

Program Description 5 

Overview 5 

Statutory Authority 5 

Specific Information 5 

Goals, Objectives, Deliverables, and Timeline 6 

Priority Areas 7 

Federal Award Information 8 

Awards, Amounts and Durations 8 

Continuation Funding Intent 8 

Availability of Funds 8 

Types of Awards 8 

Financial Management and System of Internal Controls 9 

Budget Information 9 

Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement 9 

Pre-agreement Costs (also known as Pre-award Costs) 9 

Limitation on Use of Award Funds for Employee Compensation: Waiver 9 

Prior Approval, Planning, and Reporting of Conference/Meeting/Training Costs 9 

Costs Associated with Language Assistance (if applicable) 9 

Anticipated Number of Awards 9 

Maximum Dollar Amount for each Award 10 

Period of Performance Duration 10 

Eligibility Information 10 

Application and Submission Information 10 

Information to Complete the Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424) 10 

Standard Applicant Information (JustGrants 424 and General Agency Information) 10 

Proposal Abstract 11 

Proposal Narrative 11 

Goals, Objectives, Deliverables, and Timeline 13 

Budget and Associated Documentation 13 

Budget Worksheet and Budget Narrative (Web-based Form) 13 

Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) 13 

Financial Management Questionnaire (including applicant disclosure of high-risk status) 13 

Disclosure of Process Related to Executive Compensation 13 

Additional Application Components 14 

Curriculum Vitae or Resumes 14 

Tribal Authorizing Resolution 14 

Timeline Form 14 

Letters of Support 14 

Research and Evaluation Independence and Integrity Statement 14 

Bibliography/reference 14 

Any tools/instruments, questionnaires, tables/chart/graphs, or maps 14 

List of Individuals in the Application 14 

Human Subjects Protection 14 

Privacy Certificate 15 

Request to Use Incentives or Stipends 15 

Consortium/Contractual Arrangements 15 

Page 3 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
Data Archiving Plan 15 

Disclosures and Assurances 15 

Disclosure of Lobbying Activities 15 

DOJ Certified Standard Assurances 15 

Applicant Disclosure of Duplication in Cost Items 15 

DOJ Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters; 

and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements 15 

Applicant Disclosure and Justification – DOJ High Risk Grantees (if applicable) 16 

How to Apply 16 

Submission Dates and Time 16 

Experiencing Unforeseen Technical Issues 16 

Application Review Information 17 

Review Criteria 17 

Review Process 18 

Federal Award Administration Information 19 

Federal Award Notices 19 

Administrative, National Policy, and Other Legal Requirements 19 

Information Technology (IT) Security Clauses 19 

General Information about Post-Federal Award Reporting Requirements 19 

Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s) 19 

Other Information 19 

Freedom of Information and Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552 and 5 U.S.C. 552a) 19 

Provide Feedback to OJP 20 

Performance Measures 20 

Application Checklist 21 

Endnotes 23 

Page 4 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
Program Description 

Overview 

OJP is committed to advancing work that promotes civil rights and racial equity, increases access to justice, 

supports crime victims and individuals impacted by the justice system, strengthens community safety and protects 

the public from crime and evolving threats, and builds trust between law enforcement and the community. 

With this solicitation, NIJ seeks proposals for rigorous, independent evaluations of the outcome and impact of 

projects funded under the FY 2022 OJP Community Based Violence Intervention and Prevention Initiative 

solicitation (hereafter, the OJP solicitation). Such evaluations are also expected to examine questions regarding 

program implementation (e.g., process evaluation).[1] To be considered under this solicitation, an applicant must 

collaborate with an entity applying to the OJP solicitation and clearly document that collaboration with a signed 

memorandum of understanding or letter of support. NIJ will only consider applications addressing Categories 3 

and 4 of the OJP solicitation. 

The knowledge gained through the conduct of these evaluations will build evidence as to the implementation and 

effectiveness of strategies designed to reduce violent crime using community-based interventions. This 

solicitation further supports the DOJ Comprehensive Strategy for Reducing Violent Crime. 

Beyond the documentation pertaining to the collaborating organization referenced above, applications proposing 

evaluation data collection involving partnerships with juvenile/criminal justice or other agencies should include a 

strong letter of support, signed by an appropriate decision-making authority from each proposed, partnering 

agency. A letter of support should include the partnering agency’s acknowledgement that de-identified data 

derived from, provided to, or obtained through this project will be archived by the grant recipient with the National 

Archive of Criminal Justice Data (NACJD) at the conclusion of the award. Applicants and their potential partners 

are encouraged to review the NACJD’s policies and protections at (NACJD). If selected for award, grantees will 

be expected to have a formal agreement in place with partnering agencies by October 1, 2022. That formal 

agreement must include a provision to meet the data archiving requirements of the award. 

In the case of partnerships that will involve the use of federal award funds by multiple partnering agencies to carry 

out the proposed project, only one entity/partnering agency may be the applicant (as is the case with any 

application submitted in response to this solicitation); any others must be proposed as subrecipients. 

Statutory Authority 

Department of Justice Appropriations Act, 2022 (Pub. L. No. 117-103,136 Stat 49, 27). 

Specific Information 

Though a great deal has been learned about promising strategies for violence intervention, prevention, and 

reduction, violence in our communities remains a significant problem without a simple solution.[2][3][4] 

Community violence generally happens outside the home in public spaces. Most community violence involves a 

relatively small number of people as victims or perpetrators, but violence has detrimental effects on entire 

communities: eroding public health, causing economic disruptions, and contributing to lasting individual and 

community traumas. Mitigation efforts typically focus on high-risk individuals, gun violence, and/or specific violent 

crime problems, as well as the historical and structural challenges that often result in community violence. Higher 

levels of violence in communities undermine community stability and well-being, and contribute to a lower sense 

of safety and security. This solicitation seeks to support the in-depth evaluation of projects designed to reduce 

violent crime in the community with implications for program strategies, practices, and policies. 

CVIPI is an approach that uses comprehensive evidence-based intervention and prevention programs to reduce 

violence through tailored, community-centered initiatives. This includes efforts to address gang and gun violence, 

based on partnerships between community residents, law enforcement, local government agencies, and other 

community stakeholders. These multidisciplinary strategies engage with individuals and groups to prevent and 

disrupt cycles of violence and retaliation and establish relationships with individuals and community assets to 

deliver services that save lives, address trauma, and provide opportunities to improve the physical, social, and 

economic conditions that drive violence. 

The role of NIJ in CVIPI is to support independent, rigorous evaluations of projects funded under the OJP 

Page 5 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
solicitation. NIJ recognizes that the projects funded through the OJP solicitation will implement an expansive 

range of program approaches and strategies to address community violence, in keeping with the following 

CVIPI guiding principles, as articulated in the OJP solicitation: 

Targeted Violence Interventions and Supports for Highest-Need Groups 

Community-Centered and Equity-focused 

Integration with Public Safety/Public Health 

Strategic, Data-Driven, and Performance-Focused 

NIJ encourages applicants to propose evaluations that address the complexities of CVIPI projects which engage 

stakeholders across systems such as public safety, public health, education, social services, economic 

development, housing, and other relevant community sectors.[5] Evaluation applicants should propose the most 

rigorous, appropriate design, incorporating community stakeholder and resident involvement as a focus in the 

design and conduct of the evaluation. This may include a focus on participatory or action research. 

NIJ strives to support evaluations of CVIPI projects that are evaluable and well-positioned for the conduct of indepth investigations of outcome and impact, that also examine questions regarding program implementation (e.g., 

process evaluation). NIJ seeks evaluations that include collaborations with organizations applying for funding 

under the OJP solicitation Expansion and Enhancement categories (categories 3 and 4). To qualify as an 

Expansion or Enhancement applicant, organizations must have ongoing community-based violence intervention 

strategies. 

Applicants are expected to demonstrate how their study would build on existing research. The application should 

include a clear description of the approach(es) to be evaluated, including the purpose, key components, and 

intended short, intermediate, and long-term outcomes. 

In preparing their application, the applicant should work with the OJP applicant organization to develop a 

conceptual logic model for the CVIPI project to be evaluated. If relevant, applications should include and append 

supplementary materials to describe the program, practice, or policy under study, and demonstrate that needed 

data will be available for the study. 

NIJ wants to build an understanding not only of whether an overall program is effective, but also of what elements 

within or external to the program design or implementation contribute to its success or failure. For example, 

applicants may investigate the impact of particular program services or individuals who provide services (e.g., 

violence interrupters, skills development) in producing safer communities, as well as how to best engage the 

community in violence prevention and intervention. 

CVIPI projects may impact, either intentionally or unintentionally, outcomes other than violence reduction. 

Consequently, NIJ is interested in studies that propose to explore outcomes other than violence reduction that 

such programs may have. 

The proposed evaluation should help inform the development or refinement of community intervention and/or 

prevention programs, policies, and/or practices to reduce community violence. Applicants should clearly describe 

the external validity of the proposed evaluation approach, with emphasis on how findings may be generalizable to 

additional populations and jurisdictions. 

Funds from any award under this solicitation may include reasonable costs incurred by program personnel to 

support activities directly and exclusively required for the execution of the research and evaluation (e.g., manual 

extraction of administrative records). 

Note: 

Applicants considering research and evaluation as it relates to community and firearm violence prevention and 

intervention programs, policies, and legislation other than those funded under the OJP solicitation should refer to 

the NIJ FY22 Research and Evaluation on Violent Crime and Firearm Violence in the Community solicitation. 

Goals, Objectives, Deliverables, and Timeline 

Goals 

The goal of this solicitation is to develop the evidence needed to inform and improve the effectiveness of CVIPI 

Page 6 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
policies, practices, and programs involving adult, youth, and/or child populations, designed to prevent violent 

crime and victimization in our communities. 

Objectives 

The objective of this solicitation is to evaluate the design, implementation, outcomes, and impacts of CVIPI 

projects funded under the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 OJP Community Based Violence Intervention and Prevention 

Initiative (CVIPI) solicitation in order to develop generalizable findings that inform community-based efforts to 

implement more effective violence prevention and intervention strategies. 

Deliverables 

Final Research Report. Any recipient of an award under this solicitation will be expected to submit a final 

research report. Additional information on the final research report requirement for the solicitation is posted on 

NIJ’s webpage. Applicants should plan to deliver a draft final research report 90 days prior to the conclusion of 

the award. 

Required Data Sets and Associated Files and Documentation. Any recipient of an award under this solicitation 

will be expected to submit to the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data (NACJD) all data sets that result, in 

whole or in part, from the work funded by the award, along with associated files and any documentation 

necessary for future efforts by others to reproduce the project’s findings and/or to extend the scientific value of the 

data set through secondary analysis. 

Deliverables and Dissemination for Practitioners and Policymakers. NIJ also expects that award recipients will 

make a substantial effort to make the research findings accessible to practitioner and policymaker audiences. 

This may include producing clear language articles for practitioner/ professional organization journals or 

presenting key implications for policy and practice at professional organization conferences. Successful 

applicants will identify professional journals, conferences, and/or other mechanisms that it intends to use or 

target. This effort will also include producing a report that summarizes the final research report using language 

suitable for practitioner and policymaker audiences, that NIJ can use for its own dissemination activities. 

In addition to these deliverables (and the required reports and data on performance measures), NIJ expects 

scholarly products to result from each award under this solicitation, taking the form of one or more published, 

peer-reviewed, scientific journal articles, and/or (if appropriate) law review journal articles, book chapter(s) or 

book(s) in the academic press, technological prototypes, patented inventions, or similar scientific products. 

The Goals, Objectives, and Deliverables are directly related to the performance measures that show the 

completed work’s results, as discussed in the “Application and Submission Information” section. 

Priority Areas 

The Department of Justice is committed to advancing work that promotes civil rights and racial equity, increases 

access to justice, supports crime victims and individuals impacted by the justice system, strengthens community 

safety and protects the public from crime and evolving threats, and builds trust between law enforcement and the 

community. 

1. Priority Considerations Supporting Executive Order 13985, Advancing Racial Equity and Support for

Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government

Consistent with this Executive Order, the term “underserved community” refers to a population sharing a 

particular characteristic, as well as a geographic community, that has been systematically denied a full 

opportunity to participate in aspects of economic, social, and civic life or whose members have been historically 

underserved, marginalized, and adversely affected by inequality. Such communities include, among others, Black 

people, Hispanics and Latino/a/e people, Native American and other Indigenous peoples of North America 

(including Alaska Natives, Eskimos, and Aleuts), Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders. 

In support of Executive Order 13985, OJP will: 

A. Give priority consideration to applications that propose research project(s) that will address issues related

to racial equity and the removal of barriers to access and opportunity for communities that have been

Page 7 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
historically underserved, marginalized, and adversely affected by inequality, when making award decisions. 

To receive this consideration, the applicant must describe how the proposed project(s) will address potential 

inequities and barriers to equal opportunity, and/or contribute to greater access to services for underserved 

and historically marginalized populations. 

B. Give priority consideration to applicants that can demonstrate that their capabilities and competencies for

implementing their proposed project(s) are enhanced because the applicant (or at least one proposed

subrecipient that will receive at least 30% of the requested award funding, as demonstrated in the Budget

Worksheet and Budget Narrative) identifies as a culturally specific organization. To receive this additional

priority consideration, applicants must describe how being a culturally specific organization (or funding the

culturally specific subrecipient organization(s)) will enhance their ability to implement the proposed project

(s) and should also specify which culturally specific populations are intended or expected to be served or to

have their needs addressed under the proposed project(s).

Culturally specific organizations are defined for purposes of this solicitation as private nonprofit or tribal 

organizations whose primary purpose as a whole is to provide culturally specific services to, among others, 

Black people, Hispanics and Latino/a/e people, Native American and other Indigenous peoples of North 

America (including Alaska Natives, Eskimos, and Aleuts), Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and/or 

Pacific Islanders. 

Note: Addressing these priority areas is one of many factors that the NIJ Director considers in making funding 

decisions. Receiving priority consideration for one or more priority areas is not a guarantee of an award. 

Federal Award Information 

Solicitation Categories 

This solicitation does not include Solicitation Categories. 

Awards, Amounts and Durations 

Period of Performance Start Date Period of Performance Duration (Months) 

10/1/22 12:00 AM 60 

Anticipated Total Amount to be Awarded Under 

Solicitation 

$1,900,000.00 

Additional Information 

Please see Anticipated Number of Awards, Maximum 

Dollar Amount for each Award, and Period of 

Performance Duration sections below. 

Continuation Funding Intent 

NIJ may, in certain cases, provide additional funding in future years to awards made under this solicitation 

through continuation awards. NIJ will consider, among other factors, NIJ’s strategic priorities, a recipient’s overall 

management of the award, and the award-funded work’s progress, when making continuation-award decisions. 

Availability of Funds 

This solicitation, and awards (if any are made) under this solicitation, are subject to the availability of appropriated 

funds and to any modifications or additional requirements that may be imposed by the agency or by law.  In 

addition, nothing in this solicitation is intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or 

procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or 

entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. 

Types of Awards 

NIJ expects to make awards under this solicitation as grants. See the “Administrative, National Policy, and Other 

Page 8 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
Legal Requirements” section of the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for a brief discussion of important 

statutes, regulations, and award conditions that apply to many (or in some cases, all) OJP grants. 

Financial Management and System of Internal Controls 

Award recipients and subrecipients (including recipients or subrecipients that are pass-through entities) must, as 

described in the Part 200 Uniform Requirements as set out at 2 C.F.R. 200.303, comply with standards for 

financial and program management. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information. 

Budget Information 

If the applicant is proposing a project that reasonably could be conducted in discrete phases, with each phase 

resulting in completion of one or more significant, defined milestones, then NIJ strongly recommends that the 

applicant structure the application — specifically including the narrative, expected scholarly products, 

timelines/milestones, and budget detail worksheet and budget narrative — to clearly define each phase. (This is 

particularly the case if the applicant proposes a project that will exceed — in cost or the length of the period of 

performance — the amount or length of time anticipated for an individual award (or awards) under this 

solicitation.) Given limitations on the availability to NIJ of funds for awards for research, development, and 

evaluation, this information will assist NIJ in considering whether partial funding of applications would be 

productive. (If, in FY 2022, NIJ elects to fund only certain phases of a proposed project, the expected scholarly 

products from the partial-funding award may, in some cases, vary from those described above.) 

NIJ may elect to fund applications submitted under this FY 2022 solicitation in future fiscal years, dependent on, 

among other considerations, the merit of the applications and on the availability of appropriations. 

What will not be funded: 

Applications primarily to purchase equipment, materials, or supplies. (A budget may include these items if 

they are necessary to conduct research, development, demonstration, evaluation, or analysis.) 

Applications that are not responsive to the purposes of this specific solicitation. 

Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement 

See “Cofunding” paragraph under “Budget and Associated Documentation” in the “Application and Submission 

Information” section. 

Pre-agreement Costs (also known as Pre-award Costs) 

See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on Pre-agreement Costs (also known as Preaward Costs). 

Limitation on Use of Award Funds for Employee Compensation: Waiver 

See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on Limitation on Use of Award Funds for 

Employee Compensation; Waiver.         

Prior Approval, Planning, and Reporting of Conference/Meeting/Training Costs 

See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on Prior Approval, Planning, and Reporting of 

Conference/Meeting/Training Costs. 

Costs Associated with Language Assistance (if applicable) 

See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on Costs Associated with Language Assistance. 

Anticipated Number of Awards 

Page 9 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
2 or 3. 

Maximum Dollar Amount for each Award 

To be determined by the funding requested in awarded applications, and available funding. 

Period of Performance Duration 

To be determined by the period of performance of awarded applications. Successful applicants will be expected 

to complete the work proposed within a five-year period of performance. 

Eligibility Information 

For eligibility information, see the solicitation cover page. 

For information on cost sharing or match requirements, see the “Federal Award Information” section. 

Application and Submission Information 

The following application elements must be included in the application to meet the basic minimum requirements 

to advance to peer review and receive consideration for funding: 

Proposal Narrative 

Budget Worksheet and Budget Narrative (Web-based Form) (The web-based form includes the 

budget details and the budget narrative.) 

Curriculum Vitae/Resumes for Key Personnel. (Curriculum Vitae for key personnel. For purposes of 

this solicitation, “key personnel” means the principal investigator, and any and all co-principal 

investigators.) 

See the “Application Elements and Formatting Instructions” section of the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide 

for information on what happens to an application that does not contain all the specified elements or is 

nonresponsive to the scope of the solicitation. 

Information to Complete the Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424) 

The SF-424 must be submitted in Grants.gov. The SF-424 is a required standard form used as a cover sheet for 

submission of pre-applications, applications, and related information. See the OJP Grant Application Resource 

Guide for additional information on completing the SF-424. 

In Section 8F. of the SF-424, please include the name and contact information of the individual who will 

complete the application in JustGrants. JustGrants will use this information (email address) to assign the 

application to this user in JustGrants. 

Intergovernmental Review: This solicitation (“funding opportunity”) is not subject to Executive Order 12372. (In 

completing the SF-424, an applicant is to answer question 19 by selecting the response that the “Program is not 

covered by E.O. 12372.”) 

Standard Applicant Information (JustGrants 424 and General Agency Information) 

The Standard Applicant Information section of the JustGrants application is pre-populated with the SF-424 data 

submitted in Grants.gov. The applicant will need to review the Standard Applicant Information in JustGrants and 

make edits as needed. Within this section, the applicant will need to: add zip codes for areas affected by the 

project, confirm its Authorized Representative, and verify and confirm the organization’s unique entity identifier, 

legal name, and address. 

Page 10 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
Proposal Abstract 

A proposal abstract (no more than 400 words) summarizing the proposed project, including the purpose of the 

project, primary activities, expected outcomes, the service area, intended beneficiaries and subrecipients (if 

known), will be completed in the JustGrants web-based form. This abstract should be written in the third person 

and will be made publicly available on the OJP website if the project is awarded. 

Proposal Narrative 

The proposal narrative should be submitted as an attachment in JustGrants. The attached document should be 

double-spaced, using a standard 12-point; have no less than 1-inch margins; and should not exceed 30 pages. 

Pages should be numbered and submitted as an attachment. If the proposal narrative fails to comply with these 

length-related restrictions, NIJ may negatively consider such noncompliance in peer review and in final award 

decisions. 

The following sections must be included as part of the proposal narrative: 

a. Title Page (not counted against the proposal narrative page limit)

The title page should include: 

Project title. 

Submission date. 

Funding opportunity number. 

Principal Investigator (and any co-principal investigators). 

Unique author identifier (e.g., ORCID, Researcher ID, Scopus Author ID), if available. 

Requests for consideration under “Priority Area 1(A)” and/or “Priority Area 1(B)”. 

Key words, including science focus areas. 

Contact information (that is, name, address, telephone number, and e-mail address) for both the applicant 

and the principal investigator. 

Name of the collaborating organization funded under the OJP solicitation and title and location of CVIPI 

application to be evaluated. 

b. Table of Contents and Figures (not counted against the proposal narrative page limit)

c. Main Body

1. Statement of the Problem.

The statement of the problem should address the need for research in this area. Applicants should discuss 

current gaps in data, research, and knowledge, including those for particular justice sectors, for certain 

populations, and to answer questions relevant to current policy and practice needs and public interests. It is 

not uncommon for multiple problems to exist simultaneously (for example, there may be a criminal justice 

problem affecting public safety, a current technical challenge/need identified by forensic practitioners, as 

well as a scientific/technology gap between the current state of the art and a desired solution) and 

applicants should discuss each of these clearly and justify the importance of the separate issues. As part of 

this discussion, applicants should present a review of previous literature and discuss previous research 

related to these problems. 

2. Project Design and Implementation.

Applicants should provide a detailed description of the strategies to implement this research project and 

address the research questions. Design elements should follow directly from the research project’s goals 

and objectives and address the program-specific information noted in the solicitation. Applicants should 

describe the research methodology and analysis plan in detail and demonstrate the validity and usefulness 

of the data they will collect. Applicants should consider the rigor and soundness of the methodology and 

analytical and technical approaches for the proposed research and address the feasibility of the proposed 

Page 11 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
    

project and potential challenges or problems in carrying out the activities. 

If the applicant is seeking priority consideration for Priority 1(A), it should address in this section how the 

proposed project(s) will address issues related to racial equity and/or the removal of barriers to access and 

opportunity, and/or contribute to greater access to services, for communities that have been historically 

underserved, marginalized, and adversely affected by inequality. 

3. Potential Impact.

Applicants should describe the potential impact of the research and how it may inform or improve criminal or 

juvenile justice-related policy, practice, or theory in the United States. The applicant should include a 

discussion of the proposed dissemination plan to produce scholarly products and to make information 

available to broader interested audiences, such as criminal justice practitioners or policymakers. 

4. Capabilities and Competencies.

This section should describe the experience and capability of the applicant organization, key staff, and any 

proposed subgrantees (including consultants) that the applicant will use to implement and manage this 

effort and the federal funds under this award, highlighting any previous experience implementing projects of 

similar scope, design, and magnitude. Applicants should address: 

Experience and capacity to work with the proposed data sources in the conduct of similar research 

efforts. 

Experience and capacity to design and implement rigorous research and data analysis projects. 

Experience producing and disseminating meaningful deliverables. 

Applicants should also outline the management plan and organization that connects to the goals and 

objectives of the project. 

If the applicant is seeking priority consideration under Priority 1(B), it should describe within this section how 

being a culturally specific organization (or funding a culturally specific subrecipient organization at a 

minimum of 30% of the project budget) will enhance its ability to implement the proposed project(s) and 

should also specify which culturally specific populations are intended or expected to be the subject and/or 

beneficiary of the research conducted under the proposed project(s). 

5. Appendices (not counted against the proposal narrative page limit) include:

The project management plan. 

A logic model that graphically illustrates the program’s theory of change to be measured by the 

evaluation. 

Either a signed memorandum of understanding or letter of support that documents the applicant 

organization and the CVIPI organization applying under the OJP solicitation have agreed to 

collaborate fully in the conduct of the proposed evaluation. 

If the application (including the budget) identifies any proposed non-competitive agreements that are 

or may be considered procurement "contracts" (rather than subawards), for purposes of federal grants 

administrative requirements, the applicant also must list the entities with which the applicant proposes 

to contract. 

List of other agencies, organizations, or funding sources to which this application has been submitted 

(if applicable). 

6. Plan for Collecting the Data Required for this Solicitation’s Performance Measures

Note: Applicants are not required to submit performance data with the application. Rather, performance measures 

information is included as an alert that successful applicants will be required to submit performance data as part 

of each award’s reporting requirements. 

OJP will require each successful applicant to submit regular performance data that show the completed work’s 

results. The performance data directly relate to the goals, objectives, and deliverables identified in the “Goals, 

Page 12 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
    

Objectives, and Deliverables” discussion. 

A list of performance measure questions for this program can be found on page 20. 

Applicants can also visit OJP’s performance measurement page at www.ojp.gov/performance for an overview of 

performance measurement activities at OJP. 

Award recipients will be required to submit performance measure data in quarterly financial reports, semi-annual 

performance reports, and the Final Research Report. NIJ will provide further guidance on the post-award 

submission process, if selected for award. 

Goals, Objectives, Deliverables, and Timeline 

Applicants will submit the project's goals, objectives, deliverables, and timelines in the JustGrants web-based 

form. 

Budget and Associated Documentation 

Budget Worksheet and Budget Narrative (Web-based Form) 

The applicant will complete the JustGrants web-based budget form. See the OJP Grant Application Resource 

Guide for additional information. 

If the applicant is seeking priority consideration under Priority 1(B) based on the identification of at least one 

proposed subrecipient as a culturally specific organization, the proposed funding for the subrecipient in the webbased budget form must be a minimum of 30% of award funding. 

The budget narrative must also describe how the activities that will be funded with the (minimum) 30% of award 

funding provided to the subrecipient specifically relate to the priority consideration requested under Priority 

1(B) and described in the Capabilities and Competencies section of the application. 

The following paragraph (on “Cofunding”) expressly modifies the “Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement” 

provisions in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide. The applicant is to follow the guidance in the following 

paragraph instead of the guidance stated under the “Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement” heading in the OJP 

Grant Application Resource Guide. 

Cofunding: An award made by NIJ under this solicitation may account for up to 100 percent of the total cost of 

the project. The application should indicate whether it is feasible for the applicant to contribute cash, facilities, or 

services as non-federal support for the project. The application should identify generally any such contributions 

that the applicant expects to make and the proposed budget should indicate in detail which items, if any, will be 

supported with non-federal contributions. 

For additional match information, see the “Cost Sharing or Match Requirement” section under Federal Award 

Information. 

If a successful application proposes a voluntary match amount, and OJP approves the budget, the total match 

amount incorporated into the approved budget becomes mandatory and subject to audit. 

Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) 

The applicant will submit its indirect cost rate agreement by uploading it as an attachment in JustGrants. See the 

OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information. 

Financial Management Questionnaire (including applicant disclosure of high-risk status) 

The applicant will download the questionnaire, complete it, and submit it by uploading it as an attachment in 

JustGrants. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for the link to the questionnaire and additional 

information. 

Disclosure of Process Related to Executive Compensation 

Page 13 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
This solicitation expressly modifies the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide by not incorporating its “Disclosure 

of Process Related to Executive Compensation” provisions. Applicants to this solicitation are not required to 

provide this disclosure. 

Additional Application Components 

Applicants will attach the additional requested documentation in JustGrants. 

Curriculum Vitae or Resumes 

Curriculum vitae of key personnel. Curriculum vitae or resume of the principal investigator and any and all coprincipal investigators. In addition, curriculum vitae, resume, or biographical sketches of all other individuals 

(regardless of “investigator” status) who will be significantly involved in substantive aspects of the proposed 

project (including, for example, individuals such as statisticians used to conduct proposed data analysis). 

Tribal Authorizing Resolution 

An application in response to this solicitation may require inclusion of tribal authorizing documentation as an 

attachment. If applicable, the applicant will submit the tribal authorizing documentation by uploading it as an 

attachment in JustGrants. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on tribal authorizing 

resolutions. 

Timeline Form 

Proposed project timeline and expected milestones. 

Letters of Support 

Letters of cooperation/support or administrative agreements from organizations collaborating in the project, such 

as law enforcement and correctional agencies (if applicable). 

Research and Evaluation Independence and Integrity Statement 

If an application proposes research (including research and development) and/or evaluation, the applicant must 

demonstrate research/evaluation independence and integrity, including appropriate safeguards, before it may 

receive award funds. The applicant will submit documentation of its research and evaluation independence and 

integrity by uploading it as an attachment in JustGrants. For additional information, see the OJP Grant Application 

Resource Guide. 

Bibliography/reference 

Bibliography/references. Provide a bibliography of any references cited in the Proposal Narrative. 

Any tools/instruments, questionnaires, tables/chart/graphs, or maps 

Any tools/instruments, questionnaires, tables/charts/graphs, or maps pertaining to the proposed project that are 

supplemental to such items included in the main body of the narrative. 

List of Individuals in the Application 

To assist OJP in assessing actual or apparent conflicts of interest (including such conflicts on the part of 

prospective reviewers of the application), provide a complete list of the individuals named or otherwise identified 

anywhere in the application (including in the budget or in any other attachment) who will or may work (or advise or 

consult) on the proposed research, development, or evaluation project. Applicants should use the “Proposed 

Project Staff, Affiliation, and Roles” form available on the NIJ webpage to prepare this list. 

Human Subjects Protection 

Human Subjects Protection paperwork as a separate attachment (documentation and forms related to Institutional 

Review Board [IRB] review). See https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/human-subjects-protection . Note: Final IRB approval 

is not required at the time an application is submitted. 

Page 14 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
Privacy Certificate 

Privacy Certificate as a separate attachment (for further guidance go to https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/confidentialityand-privacy-protections and https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/model-privacy-certificate). 

Request to Use Incentives or Stipends 

Applicants proposing to use incentives or stipends payments as part of their research project design, must submit 

an incentive or stipend approval request, as a separate document, according to the requirements set forth at 

https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/participant-support-costs-and-incentives-social-science-research. 

Consortium/Contractual Arrangements 

Explain the programmatic, fiscal, and administrative arrangements to be made between the applicant organization 

and the consortium organization(s). 

Data Archiving Plan 

Applicants should anticipate that NIJ will require, through special award conditions, that data sets resulting, in 

whole or in part, from projects funded under this solicitation be submitted for archiving with the NACJD. See 

https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/research-development-and-evaluation-grant-award-requirements#data. 

Applications should include as an appendix a brief plan as a separate attachment — labeled “Data Archiving 

Plan” — to comply with data archiving requirements. The plan should provide brief details about proposed data 

management and archiving, including submission to NIJ (through NACJD) of all files and documentation 

necessary to allow for future efforts by others to reproduce the project’s findings and/or to extend the scientific 

value of the data set through secondary analysis. Pertinent files and documentation include, among other things, 

qualitative and quantitative data produced, instrumentation and data collection forms, codebook(s), any 

specialized programming code necessary to reproduce all constructed measures and the original data analysis, 

description of necessary de-identification procedures, and (when required) a copy of the privacy certificate and 

informed consent protocols. 

The plan should be one or two pages in length and include the level of effort associated with meeting archiving 

requirements. 

Note that recipients are strongly encouraged to submit required data sets at least 90 days before the end of the 

period of performance. 

Disclosures and Assurances 

The applicant will address the following disclosures and assurances. 

Disclosure of Lobbying Activities 

Complete and submit the SF-LLL in Grants.gov. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional 

information. 

DOJ Certified Standard Assurances 

Review and accept the DOJ Certified Standard Assurances in JustGrants. See the OJP Grant Application 

Resource Guide for additional information. 

Applicant Disclosure of Duplication in Cost Items 

Complete the JustGrants web-based Applicant Disclosure of Duplication in Cost Items form. See the OJP Grant 

Application Resource Guide for additional information. 

DOJ Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free 

Workplace Requirements 

Page 15 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
Review and accept the DOJ Certified Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension and Other 

Responsibility Matters; Drug-Free Workplace Requirements; Law Enforcement and Community Policing in 

JustGrants. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information. 

Applicant Disclosure and Justification – DOJ High Risk Grantees (if applicable) 

If applicable, submit the DOJ High Risk Disclosure and Justification as an attachment in JustGrants. A DOJ High 

Risk Grantee is an award recipient that has received a DOJ High Risk designation based on a documented 

history of unsatisfactory performance, financial instability, management system or other internal control 

deficiencies, or noncompliance with award terms and conditions on prior awards, or that is otherwise not 

responsible. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information. 

How to Apply 

Step 1: The applicant must submit the SF-424 and SF-LLL in Grants.gov at 

https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/register.html. 

Step 2: The applicant must then submit the full application, including attachments, in JustGrants in 

JustGrants.usdoj.gov. 

For additional information, see the “How to Apply” section in the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide and the 

DOJ Application Submission Checklist. 

Submission Dates and Time 

The SF-424 and the SF-LLL must be submitted in Grants.gov by 11:59 p.m. eastern time on June 7, 2022. 

The full application must be submitted in JustGrants by 8:59 p.m. eastern time on June 21, 2022. 

OJP urges applicants to submit their Grants.gov and JustGrants submissions prior to the due dates to allow 

sufficient time to correct errors and resubmit by the submission deadlines if a rejection notification is received. To 

be considered timely, the full application must be submitted in JustGrants by the JustGrants application 

deadline. 

Experiencing Unforeseen Technical Issues 

An applicant that experiences unforeseen SAM.gov, Grants.gov, or JustGrants technical issues beyond its control 

that prevent application submission by the deadline, must demonstrate all efforts in requesting technical support 

in order to submit an application by the deadline. Technical support is available via phone and email to the 

applicable SAM.gov, Grants.gov, or JustGrants support centers or service desks in which an applicant received a 

ticket number for resolution. If an applicant misses a deadline due to unforeseen technical difficulties, the 

applicant may request a waiver to submit an application after the deadline. Note: If an applicant does not submit 

all the required Grants.gov forms by the Grants.gov deadline, the applicant will not be able to proceed to the 

JustGrants portion of the application process. 

An applicant experiencing technical difficulties with the following systems must contact the associated support 

desk indicated below to report the technical issue and receive a tracking number: 

Grants.gov - contact the Grants.gov Customer Support Hotline 

SAM.gov - contact the SAM Help Desk (Federal Service Desk) 

JustGrants - contact the JustGrants Support Desk at JustGrants.Support@usdoj.gov or 833–872–5175 

An applicant requesting a waiver to submit a late application must document their request for technical assistance 

in an email to the OJP Response Center at grants@ncjrs.gov within 24 hours after the application deadline to 

request approval to submit its application after the deadline. If an applicant has technical issues with Grants.gov, 

the applicant must contact the OJP Response Center within 24 hours of the Grants.gov deadline to request 

Page 16 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
approval to submit after the deadline. Waiver requests to submit after the submission deadline must: 

Describe the technical difficulties experienced; 

Include a timeline of the applicant's submission efforts (e.g., what date and time did the error occur, what 

date and time was action taken to resolve the issue and resubmit; and what date and time did support 

representatives respond) 

Include an attachment(s) of the complete grant application and all required documentation and material; and 

Include the applicant's Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) and any applicable SAM.gov tracking number(s), 

Grants.gov Help Desk, and JustGrants Support Desk Ticket Numbers. 

OJP will review each request for late submission and required supporting documentation and notify the applicant 

whether the request has been approved or denied. For more details on the waiver process, OJP encourages 

applicants to review the “Experiencing Unforeseen Technical Issues” section in the OJP Grant Application 

Resource Guide. 

Application Review Information 

Review Criteria 

Merit Review Criteria 

Applications that meet the basic minimum requirements will be evaluated by peer reviewers on how the proposed 

project/program addresses the following criteria: 

1. Statement of the Problem (understanding of the problem) (15%)

Demonstrated understanding of the problem. 

Demonstrated importance of research questions, goals and objectives, including alignment with the aims of 

the solicitation. 

Demonstrated awareness of the state of current research. 

2. Project Design and Implementation (quality and technical merit) (50%).

Feasibility of proposed project. 

Soundness of methods and analytic and technical approach to addressing the stated aim(s) of the proposed 

project. 

Awareness of potential pitfalls of proposed project design and feasibility of proposed actions to minimize 

and/or mitigate them. 

Feasibility of completing the deliverables noted in the solicitation. 

3. Capabilities and Competencies (capabilities, demonstrated productivity, and experience of the applicant

organization and proposed project staff) (15%)

Qualifications and experience of proposed project staff (that is, the principal investigator, any and all coprincipal investigators, and all other individuals (and organizations) identified in the application (regardless 

of “investigator” status) who will be significantly involved in substantive aspects of the proposed project). 

Demonstrated ability of the applicant organization to implement the proposed strategies and manage the 

effort. 

Relationship between the capabilities/competencies of the proposed project staff (including the applicant 

organization) and the scope and strategies of the proposed project. 

4. Potential Impact (20%)

Page 17 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
Potential for a significant scientific or technical advance(s) that will improve criminal/juvenile justice in the 

United States. 

Potential for significantly improved understanding of the stated criminal/juvenile justice problem. 

Potential for innovative solution to address (all or a significant part of) the stated criminal/juvenile justice 

problem. 

Strength and feasibility of the proposed dissemination plan to produce scholarly products (such as 

published, peer-reviewed, scientific journal articles, book chapter(s) or book(s) in the academic press, 

technological prototypes, patented inventions, databases, standards or similar scientific products) as well as 

make summary information available to broader interested audiences, such as criminal justice practitioners 

or policymakers. 

5. Budget (0%)

In addition, peer reviewers will consider and may comment on the following additional items in the context of

scientific and technical merit.

Alignment of the proposed budget with proposed project activities. 

Total cost of the project relative to the perceived benefit (cost effectiveness). 

Appropriateness of the budget relative to the level of effort. 

Use of existing resources to conserve costs. 

Other Review Criteria 

Other important considerations for NIJ include geographic diversity, strategic priorities (specifically including, but 

not limited to, those mentioned above relating to priority areas), available funding, past performance, and the 

extent to which the Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative (web-based form) accurately explain project 

costs that are reasonable, necessary, and otherwise allowable under federal law and applicable federal cost 

principles. 

Review Process 

Applications submitted under this solicitation that meet the basic minimum requirements, will be evaluated for 

technical merit by a peer review panel(s) in accordance with OJP peer review policy and procedures using the 

stated review criteria listed above. 

OJP screens applications to ensure they meet the basic minimum requirements prior to conducting the peer 

review. Although specific requirements may vary, the following are common requirements applicable to all OJP 

solicitations: 

The application must be submitted by an eligible type of applicant. 

The application must request funding within programmatic funding constraints (if applicable). 

The application must be responsive to the scope of the solicitation. 

The application must include all items necessary to meet the basic minimum requirements. 

The application, if submitted by an applicant that is a DOJ High Risk Grantee, or is designated “high 

risk” by a federal grant-making agency outside of DOJ, must not have been determined by the NIJ 

Director to pose a substantial risk of program implementation failure, based on 1) the applicant’s lack 

of sufficient progress in addressing required corrective actions necessary for removal of the DOJ 

High Risk Grantee (or non-DOJ high risk) designation, 2) the nature and severity of the issues 

leading to or accompanying the DOJ High Risk Grantee (or non-DOJ high risk) designation, and/or 3) 

the applicant’s expected ability to manage grant funds and achieve grant goals and objectives. 

Pursuant to the Part 200 Uniform Requirements, before award decisions are made, OJP also reviews information 

Page 18 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
related to the degree of risk posed by the applicant. Among other things to help assess whether an applicant with 

one or more prior federal awards has a satisfactory record with respect to performance, integrity, and business 

ethics, OJP checks whether the applicant is listed in SAM as excluded from receiving a federal award. 

In addition, if OJP anticipates that an award will exceed $250,000 in federal funds, OJP also must review and 

consider any information about the applicant that appears in the non-public segment of the integrity and 

performance system accessible through SAM (currently, the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity 

Information System, FAPIIS). 

Important note on FAPIIS: An applicant may review and comment on any information about itself that currently 

appears in FAPIIS and was entered by a federal awarding agency. OJP will consider such comments by the 

applicant, in addition to the other information in FAPIIS, in its assessment of the risk posed by the applicant. 

All final award decisions will be made by the Director of the National Institute of Justice, who may consider not 

only peer review ratings and NIJ recommendations, but also other factors as indicated in this section. 

Federal Award Administration Information 

Federal Award Notices 

See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on award notifications and instructions. 

Administrative, National Policy, and Other Legal Requirements 

If selected for funding, in addition to implementing the funded project consistent with the OJP-approved 

application, the recipient must comply with all award conditions and all applicable requirements of federal statutes 

and regulations, including the applicable requirements referred to in the assurances and certifications executed in 

connection with award acceptance. For additional information on these legal requirements, see the 

“Administrative, National Policy, and Other Legal Requirements” section in the OJP Grant Application Resource 

Guide. 

Information Technology (IT) Security Clauses 

An application in response to this solicitation may require inclusion of information related to information 

technology security. See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on information technology 

security. 

General Information about Post-Federal Award Reporting Requirements 

In addition to the deliverables described in the “Program Description” section, all award recipients under this 

solicitation will be required to submit certain reports and data. 

Required reports. Award recipients typically must submit quarterly financial reports, semi-annual performance 

reports, final financial and performance reports, final research reports, and, if applicable, an annual audit report in 

accordance with the Part 200 Uniform Requirements or specific award conditions. Future awards and fund 

drawdowns may be withheld if reports are delinquent. (In appropriate cases, OJP may require additional reports.) 

See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for additional information on specific post-award reporting 

requirements, including performance measure data. 

Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s) 

For questions directed to the Federal Awarding Agency, see OJP Response Center contact information on page 

2. 

For contact information for Grants.gov and JustGrants, see page 2. 

Other Information 

Freedom of Information and Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552 and 5 U.S.C. 552a) 

Page 19 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act (5 

U.S.C. 552 and 5 U.S.C. 552a). 

Provide Feedback to OJP 

See the OJP Grant Application Resource Guide for information on how to provide feedback to OJP. 

Performance Measures 

Objective Performance Measure(s) Data Recipient Provides 

Conduct research in social and 

behavioral sciences having clear 

implications for criminal justice 

policy and practice in the United 

States. 

1. Relevance to the needs of the field as

measured by whether the project’s

substantive scope did not deviate from the

funded project or any subsequent agencyapproved modifications to the scope.

2. Quality of the research as demonstrated

by the scholarly products that result, in

whole or in part, from work funded under

the NIJ award, such as published, peerreviewed, scientific journal articles, and/or

(as appropriate for the funded project) law

review journal articles, book chapter(s) or

book(s) in the academic press,

technological prototypes, patented

inventions, or similar scientific products.

3. Quality of management as measured by

such factors as whether significant project

milestones were achieved, reporting and

other deadlines were met, and costs

remained within approved limits.

1. Quarterly financial reports, semiannual and final performance reports,

and products of the work performed

under the NIJ award (including, at

minimum, a final research report). If

applicable, an annual audit report.

2. List of citation(s) to all scholarly

products that resulted, in whole or in

part, from work funded under the NIJ

award.

3. If applicable, each data set that

resulted, in whole or in part, from work

funded under the NIJ award.

Page 20 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
Application Checklist 

NIJ FY22 Evaluation of OJP Community Based Violence Intervention and Prevention Initiative (CVIPI) 

Projects 

This application checklist has been created as an aid in developing an application. The DOJ Application 

Submission Checklist is another resource. 

What an Applicant Must Do: 

Prior to registering in Grants.gov: 

Confirm your Entity’s System Award Management (SAM) Registration Information (see OJP Grant 

Application Resource Guide) 

To register in Grants.gov: 

Acquire an Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) and a Grants.gov username and 

password (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) 

Acquire AOR confirmation from the E-Business Point of Contact (E-Biz POC) (see OJP Grant 

Application Resource Guide) 

To find the funding opportunity: 

Search for the funding opportunity in Grants.gov using the opportunity number, Assistance Listing or keyword(s) 

Access the funding opportunity and application package (see Step 7 in the OJP Grant Application 

Resource Guide) 

Sign up for Grants.gov email notifications (optional) (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) 

Read Important Notice: Applying for Grants in Grants.gov 

Read OJP policy and guidance on conference approval, planning, and reporting available at 

ojp.gov/financialguide/DOJ/PostawardRequirements/chapter3.10a.htm (see OJP Grant Application 

Resource Guide 

Overview of Post-Award Legal Requirements: 

Review the “Overview of Legal Requirements Generally Applicable to OJP Grants and Cooperative 

Agreements - FY 2022 Awards” in the OJP Funding Resource Center. 

Review Scope Requirement: 

The federal amount requested is within the allowable limit(s) of $1.9M. 

Review Eligibility Requirement: See cover page. 

~~~ 

Prepare to submit the Application for Federal Assistance standard form (SF)-424 and Disclosure of

Lobbying Activities form (SF-LLL) 

Review Information to complete the Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424) in Grants.gov 

Complete Standard Applicant Information (SF-424 information from Grants.gov) 

Submit the SF-424 and SF-LLL in Grants.gov 

After the SF-424 and SF-LLL submission in Grants.gov, receive Grants.gov email notifications that: 

Submission has been received in Grants.gov 

Submission has either been successfully validated or rejected with errors (see OJP Grant Application 

Resource Guide) 

If no Grants.gov receipt and validation, or error notifications are received: 

Contact OJP Response Center regarding technical difficulties (see OJP Grant Application Resource 

Guide) 

Page 21 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
Receive email notification to complete application in JustGrants: 

Proceed to complete application in JustGrants 

Content of Application Submission: Critical Application Elements 

The following items are critical application elements required to pass the basic minimum requirements review. If 

OJP determines that an application does not include the following elements, it will neither proceed to peer review, 

nor receive further consideration. 

Proposal Narrative 

Budget Worksheet and Budget Narrative (web-based form) 

Curriculum Vitae/Resumes for Key Personnel. (Curriculum Vitae for key personnel. For purposes of 

this solicitation, “key personnel” means the principal investigator, and any and all co-principal 

investigators.) 

~~~ 

Proposal Abstract 

Budget and Associated Documentation: 

Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) 

Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Questionnaire (see OJP Grant Application 

Resource Guide) 

Disclosure of Process related to Executive Compensation (see OJP Grant Application Resource 

Guide) 

Additional Application Components: 

Tribal Authorizing Resolution (if applicable) (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) 

Research and Evaluation Independence and Integrity (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) 

Bibliography/references 

Tools/instruments, questionnaires, tables/charts/graphs, or maps (if applicable) 

Curriculum vitae/resumes for key personnel 

Proposed project staff, affiliations, and roles 

Project timeline and milestones 

Consortium/contractual agreements (if applicable) 

Human Subjects Protection paperwork 

Privacy Certificate 

Data archiving plan 

Letters of cooperation/support or administrative agreements from organizations collaborating in the 

project, such as law enforcement and correctional agencies (if applicable) 

Incentive or stipend approval request (if applicable) 

Disclosures and Assurances: 

Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL) (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) 

Applicant Disclosure of Duplication in Cost Items (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) 

DOJ Certified Standard Assurances (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) 

DOJ Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters; 

and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements (see OJP Grant Application Resource Guide) 

Applicant Disclosure and Justification – DOJ High Risk Grantees (if applicable) (see OJP Grant 

Application Resource Guide) 

Appendices: 

Project management plan 

Logic model 

Page 22 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279
Either a signed memorandum of understanding or letter of support that documents the applicant 

organization and the CVIPI organization applying under the OJP solicitation have agreed to collaborate fully 

in the conduct of the proposed evaluation 

List of the entities with which the applicant proposes to contract (if applicable) 

List of other agencies, organizations, or funding sources to which this application has been submitted (if 

applicable) 

Submit application in JustGrants: 

Application has been successfully submitted in JustGrants 

If no JustGrants application submission, validation, or error notifications are received: 

Contact the JustGrants Service Desk at 833-872-5175 or JustGrants.Support@usdoj.gov regarding technical difficulties. 

Endnotes 

[1] Applicants interested in conducting research and evaluation on community violence not funded under FY 22

Office of Justice Programs Community Based Violence Intervention and Prevention Initiative should consider

submitting an application to NIJ’s solicitation entitled, NIJ FY22 Research and Evaluation on Violent Crime and

Firearm Violence in the Community.

[2] Lopez, B.E. and Haskins, P.A. (2021, Nov 30). The Fight Against Rampant Gun Violence: Data-Driven

Scientific Research Will Light the Way. Police Chief Online. https://www.policechiefmagazine.org/the-fightagainst-rampant-gun-violence/?ref=22c041fab2103e0a05dc9f3c8f7d424d.

[3] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2017). Community Violence as a Population

Health Issue: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

https://doi.org/10.17226/23661.

[4] Carlton, M.P. (2021). Advancing Knowledge to Reduce Gangs and Gang Violence: Perspectives from

Researchers and Practitioners. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/300672.pdf.

[5] Link to the OJP CVIPI checklist (TBD if released)

Page 23 of 23 

O-NIJ-2022-171279