alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-2145

___________

Gary Barfield, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Arvindra Brar, M.D., Delta Regional * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Unit, Arkansas Department of *

Correction; Max Mobley, Deputy * [UNPUBLISHED]

Director of Health and Correctional *

Programs, Arkansas Department of *

Correction; Regina Jacob, Infirmary *

Supervisor, Delta Regional Unit, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: November 28, 2001

 Filed: December 6, 2001 

___________

Before BOWMAN, BRIGHT, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Gary Barfield brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action complaining that appellees

and others were deliberately indifferent to his need for knee surgery. The district
1

The HONORABLE SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, Chief Judge of the United

States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and

recommendation of the HONORABLE J. THOMAS RAY, United States Magistrate

Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

court1 granted summary judgment to appellee Max Mobley because he was not

involved in the knee surgery decision. After an evidentiary hearing, the court (1)

dismissed the claims against Dr. Arvindra Brar because she repeatedly treated

Barfield’s knee condition, and his assertion that he required knee surgery was simply

a disagreement over the proper course of medical treatment; and (2) dismissed the

claims against Regina Jacob because she did nothing but respond to Barfield’s

grievances by reviewing his medical file. Barfield appeals these rulings. After de

novo review of the record, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s

orders and deny Barfield’s motion for appointment of counsel. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05740

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 05740\05740_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05740\05740_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

05740\05740_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05740\05740_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05740\05740_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05740\05740_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05740\05740_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05740\05740_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

05740\Certification Statement_05740.pdf Plant certification statement

x 05740\Supporting Documentation\05740_Final EPA Copy-Ashtabula-Part A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05740\Supporting Documentation\05740_Final EPA Copy-Ashtabula-Part A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05740\Supporting Documentation\Final EPA Copy-Ashtabula-Part D3-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 906 OF
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of TIB Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Edward V. Lett, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.

Date: November 7, 2003
                                          /s/ Edward V. Lett
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Edward V. Lett
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to TIB Financial Corp. and will be
retained by TIB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2022210EN.01000301.xml

| 25.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10683 – APPLIED / TEMASEK / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 210/03)

On 18 May 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10683. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10683. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-16-00214-CR

PATRICK LEE WALLACE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1323172

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Our review of the clerk’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as 

that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security 

number, tax identification number or similar government-issued personal identification number.” 

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(1). The clerk’s record contains the appellant’s social security number. 

Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, 

including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX.R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper 

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the 

clerk’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in 

accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: April 27, 2017
Exhibit 32.2






               Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. & Subsidiaries
                    Certification Of Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                     Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
                                     Of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Commodore Applied Technologies,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on form 10-Q for the three month  period ended March 31, 2006,
James DeAngelis hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
his knowledge:

         (1)  The annual report fully complies with the  requirements of section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents,
              in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

Date:    May 22, 2006

/s/ James M. DeAngelis
----------------------
James M. DeAngelis
Sr. Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
Exhibit 3.1
  
 State of California
   IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I execute this certificate and affix
the Great Seal of the State of California this day of(SEAL)JUL  9 2008-s- Debra BowenDEBRA BOWENSecretary of State
 (Sec/State
Form CE-107 (REV 1/2007)




---



##### 



A0679454ENDORSED  FILEDIn the office of the Secretary of Stateof the State of CaliforniaJUN 26 2008
 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
ARADIGM CORPORATION
  1.
 2.
   3.
 4.




---



##### 



/s/ Igor GondaIgor GondaChief Executive Officer/s/ Norman HalleenNorman HalleenInterim Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEPTEMBER
30, 1996 COMPILED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          13,053
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  996,238
<ALLOWANCES>                                   500,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               509,291
<PP&E>                                       7,636,247
<DEPRECIATION>                                 493,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,783,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          517,122
<BONDS>                                        241,775
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  8,365,000
<COMMON>                                         5,345
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,346,195)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,783,047
<SALES>                                         12,754
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               290,371
<CGS>                                           11,105
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  536,104
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                87,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (741,717)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (741,717)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (741,717)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 24.5
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
  (1)
    
    To execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigneds
capacity as a director and/or officer of Spartech Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the Company), Form 10-K in accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules thereunder;(2)
    
    To do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which
may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 10-K complete
and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such form with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or similar
authority; and(3)
    
    To take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to, in
the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being understood
that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the undersigned
pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall contain such
terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such
attorney-in-facts discretion.
   th
 /s/ Walter J. KleinSignatureWalter J. KleinPrint Name
Exhibit 32.4



Statement of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Southern California Gas Company (the "Company") certifies that:



(i)

the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







February 26, 2008



/S/  Dennis V. ArriolaDennis V. ArriolaChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,690
<SECURITIES>                                    39,054
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,639
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (280)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,129
<PP&E>                                           1,504
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,412
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        58,024
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,436
<SALES>                                          1,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,583
<CGS>                                            1,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,826
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,595)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,595)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,595)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2022 ND 5

Raynard Leroy Lebeau
, Petitioner and Appellant

v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20210221

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven L. Marquart , Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam

.
Kiara C. Kraus

- Parr, Grand Forks, ND

, for petitioner and appellant.

Renata J. Olafson Selzer, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND
, for respondent and appellee.1 Lebeau v. State No. 20210221

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Raynard Leroy Lebeau appeals from an order of the district court summarily dismissing his second application for postconviction relief. Lebeau argues the district court erred in dismissing his application because he received ineffective assistance of couns el in the underlying criminal matter. Because Lebeau’s claims are barred by res judicata under N.D.C.C. § 29

- 32.1

- 12, and Lebeau failed to raise any genuine issue of material fact in response to the State’s motion for summary dismissal, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7); See Atkins v. State , 2021 ND 112, 961 N.W.2d 278 (summarily affirming d enial of an application for postconviction relief under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7) where the claims were barred by res judicata and the peti tioner failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
FILED 

 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 07/22/99 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

PUBLISH

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 97-4076

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 96-646-CR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KHADIJAH S. CAMPBELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(July 22, 1999)

Before RONEY and LAY*

, Senior Circuit Judges.**

PER CURIAM:

_______________

*Honorable Donald P. Lay, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting

by designation.

** This decision is rendered by a quorum, due to the retirement of then-Chief Judge

Hatchett on May 14, 1999. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
2

On April 21, 1998, we filed an opinion vacating the judgment in this case and

remanding for re-sentencing. United States v. Campbell, 139 F.3d 820 (11th Cir.

1998). Our decision followed the same line of reasoning as a prior panel of this

circuit in United States v. DeVaron, 136 F.3d 740 (11th Cir. 1998). We held that it

was improper for the sentencing court to consider a fact that “relates solely to

Campbell’s status as a drug courier,” citing United States v. Velosa, 83 F.3d 380 (11th

Cir. 1996).

On motion of the government, we stayed the mandate in this case until

rehearing en banc of DeVaron. The full court has now issued its opinion which

overrules the precedents set in United States v. Velosa, 83 F.3d 380 (11th Cir. 1996)

and United States v. DeVaron, 136 F.3d 740 (11th Cir. 1998). See United States v.

DeVaron, 175 F.3d 930, 11th Cir. 1999 (en banc). In light of that en banc opinion,

we vacate our prior opinion and affirm the judgment and sentence in this case.

It was not improper for the district court to rely on factors relating to

defendant’s status as a drug courier in denying her a minor role adjustment. A review

of the record reveals that there was no clear error in the determination that defendant

was not entitled to a minor role adjustment in her sentence.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>                     This schedule contains summary financial information
                             extracted from Hondo Oil & Gas Company's Form 10-K for
                             the period identified below.  This information is
                             qualified in its entirety by reference to such
                             financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000
       
<S>                          <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR
<CASH>                                1,019
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                           296
<ALLOWANCES>                             44
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      1,316
<PP&E>                               40,612
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       44,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 7,150
<BONDS>                             102,903
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             13,788
<OTHER-SE>                         (106,961)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         44,930
<SALES>                                   4
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         29
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    6,222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (10,790)
<INCOME-TAX>                             (2)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (10,788)
<DISCONTINUED>                       (1,600)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        (12,388)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.90)
        





















</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FILM ROMAN, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTH
PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       6,114,879
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  708,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 16,434,389
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,025,427
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,109,563
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,670,556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,653
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,432,507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,670,556
<SALES>                                     12,695,681
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,695,681
<CGS>                                       12,609,861
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,609,861
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,307,155
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              70,923
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,150,412)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,570
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,151,982)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,151,982)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>