alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia

# AGENCY:

Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia (CSOSA).

# ACTION:

Notice of public availability.

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with section 743 of Division C of the FY2010 Consolidated Appropriations Act, the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency hereby advises the public of the availability of the FY 2020 Service Contract Inventory. This analysis provides information on service contract actions over $25,000 that were made in FY2022. The information is organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed throughout the agency. This inventory analysis and plan have been developed in accordance with guidance issued on November 5, 2010, and December 19, 2011, by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). CSOSA's FY2022 Service Contract Inventory Analysis, and the FY2023 Service Contract Inventory Plan is available on CSOSA's website at:                         *CSOSA-SCI-2022-2023-Analysis-Report.pdf.*                         CSOSA's FY 2022 service contract inventory data is included in the government-wide inventory posted on                         *www.acquisition.gov*                         and the government-wide inventory can be filtered to display the inventory data for CSOSA.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reggie James, Senior Procurement Executive, Associate Director, Office of Administration, 800 N Capitol St. NW, Washington, DC 20002, at (202) 220-5707 or                         *Reggie.James@csosa.gov.*

Dated: September 13, 2024.

Willis Stamps,

Supervisory Attorney-Advisor.

[FR Doc. 2024-21384 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3129-04-P
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shelby T. Brewer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc.    /s/ Shelby T. Brewer DATE:  May 14, 2008 Dr. Shelby T. Brewer, Chief Executive Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Commodore Applied Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.        1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Centers of Excellence for Translational Research (U19 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         October 29-31, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G53, Rockville, MD 20852 (Video Assisted Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Caitlin A. Brennan, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G53, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 761-7792,                         *caitlin.brennan2@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 16, 2024.

Lauren A. Fleck, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-21506 Filed 9-19-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21366]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 329 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-667, CP2024-676.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21366 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - XLR Medical Corp. - Exhibit 10.3





	XLR MEDICAL CORP. 

      Suite 3400 Park Place, 666 Burrard Street 

      Vancouver, BC V6C 3P6 

      Canada 


October 13, 2004 

	TO: 	Exelar Corporation 
	 	 
	AND TO:	Exelar Medical Corporation 


 Dear Sirs: 

	 RE:  	 Technology Acquisition and Funding Agreement 
    
	  	 dated March 22, 2004 (the Agreement") 
    



This will confirm that in consideration of Exelar Corporation and Exelar Medical Corporation agreeing not to exercise their rights to deliver a Notice of Default under paragraph 12.2 of the Agreement the parties have agreed that the period of 20
days from receipt of notice for the curing of a default under the Agreement shall be reduced to three (3) days. 


Please sign where indicated below to confirm our amendment to the terms of the Agreement. 

Yours truly,

	 XLR Medical Corp. (formerly
      TSI Medical Corp.)  	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	per: 	 /s/ Logan
      B. Anderson  	 




 Agreed and Accepted this ____ day of October, 2004 

	 Exelar Corporation 
    	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	per: 	 /s/ Len Reiffel 
    	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Exelar Medical Corporation  	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	per: 	 /s/ Len Reiffel
ROLLAND ALLOTEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2143

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 9, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Marianne L. Aho, Judge.

Rolland Allotey, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 25, 2013

t0617 

# Order

Clerk June 25, 2013

146657

In re Petition of the Wayne County Treasurer

for Foreclosure of Certain Lands for Unpaid

Taxes

_________________________________________

WAYNE COUNTY TREASURER

Petitioner

- Appellee,

v SC: 146657

COA: 311690

Wayne CC: 11

- 007010

- CH

MATTHEW TATARIAN, MICHAEL KELLY,

BIMINI PROPERTIES II, INC., DETROIT

LEASING, INC., CHEROKEE LAND,

BELMONT PROPERTIES, and DETROIT,

MI, L.L.C.,

Respondents

- Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2735 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2735

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require establishment of 
objective numerical recovery goals for removal of species from lists of 
endangered species and threatened species under that Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2015

 Mr. Conaway (for himself and Mr. Westerman) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require establishment of 
objective numerical recovery goals for removal of species from lists of 
endangered species and threatened species under that Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Accountable Recovery Act''.

SEC. 2. OBJECTIVE NUMERICAL GOALS FOR REMOVAL OF SPECIES FROM LISTS OF 
              ENDANGERED SPECIES AND THREATENED SPECIES.

    Section 4(f) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 
1533(f)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by 
                striking ``develop and'' and inserting ``, at the time 
                of a determination in accordance with subsection (a), 
                develop, make publicly available, and propose to''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by inserting ``, 
                including objective numerical recovery goals,'' after 
                ``criteria''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(5)(A) Before the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date 
the Secretary receives a petition from a State in which is located a 
species included in a list under subsection (c), or from any other 
interested State or other person, that objective numerical recovery 
goals required for the species under subsection (f)(1)(B)(ii) have been 
achieved, the Secretary may determine that the petition does not 
present such substantial information, or that such goals have not been 
achieved, and publish the reasons for such determination.
    ``(B) A species that is the subject of a petition referred to in 
subparagraph (A) is deemed to have been removed from the lists 
published under subsection (c) upon the end of such 30-day period if 
the Secretary has not issued a determination under subparagraph (A).''.
                                 <all>
```
```

CONFIRMING STATEMENT

    This statement confirms that the undersigned, Howard F. Halderman, has authorized and designated, Jennifer Mainord, Amanda C. Williams or Rhonda Bost, to execute and file on the undersignedTMs behalf, all Form 3, 4, and 5 (including amendments thereto) that the undersigned may be required to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a result of the undersignedTMs ownership of or transactions in securities of First Merchants Corporation.  The authority of Jennifer Mainord, Amanda C. Williams or Rhonda Bost under this statement shall continue until the undersigned is no longer required to file Form 3, 4, and 5 with regard to the undersigned ownership or transactions in securities of First Merchants Corporation, unless earlier revoked in writing.  The undersigned acknowledges Jennifer Mainord, Amanda C. Williams or Rhonda Bost are not assuming any of the undersignedTMs responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                        __/s/ Howard F. Halderman______
                        Howard F. Halderman

Date: February 13, 2014
```
#### LINDSEY v. CASTON et al.

No. 8714.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

June 8, 1938.

Rehearing Denied July 6, 1938.

*844Murphy & Leslie, of San Angelo, for appellant.

O’Neal Dendy, of San Angelo, for ap-pellees.

McCLENDON, Chief Justice.

This is a forcible entry and detainer suit, filed in the justice court, appealed to the county court, and thence to this court. The judgment, based upon a special issue jury verdict, was in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding possession of the premises involved and damages for their detention. The appeal is by defendant.

There is no statement of facts and no legal excuse for failure to obtain one. There was no stenographer available to take down the testimony, and the failure of the trial court to appoint one under the circumstances was not error. The fact situation in this regard was substantially the same as that in Universal Life Ins. Co. v. Larremore, Tex.Civ.App., 32 S.W.2d 964.

Error is assigned upon the alleged refusal of the court “to make a comprehensive findings of the facts and conclusions of law, in order that an appeal might be intelligently heard”; citing 41 Tex.Jur. p. 1282, § 406. The court did file findings of fact and conclusions of law, at the request of appellant. These support the judgment in every particular. Errors or omissions therein could only be shown by reference to a statement of facts. This might have been obtained by following the prescribed procedure. R.C.S. Art. 2243. The requirement that the judge file findings and conclusions applies only in cases tried without a jury. Art. 2247, Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 2247; Schofield v. Texas Bank & Trust Co., Tex.Civ.App., 175 S.W. 506. We therefore attach no importance to the findings and conclusions filed in this case. The jury verdict performs the fact finding function, and its correctness could only be challenged by reference to a statement of facts, — not by fact findings made by the trial judge.

The remaining propositions complain of insufficiency of the evidence and of alleged errors in rulings upon admission of evidence, the charge to the jury, and argument of counsel. These alleged errors “cannot be intelligently reviewed in the absence of a statement of facts, because there is no method of ascertaining their pertinence to the case made at the trial.” Larremore Case (page 965), above.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 23.01**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

Ambac Financial Group, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-152479, 333-110145 and 333-52449) of our reports datedMarch 16, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (Debtor-in-Possession) (“Ambac” or the “Company”) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and all related financial statement schedules, and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 Form 10-K of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph that states that, Ambac filed for relief under Chapter 11of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and there are uncertainties inherent in the bankruptcy process. The significant deterioration of the guaranteed portfolio coupled with the inability to write new financial guarantees has adversely impacted the business,results of operations and financial condition of the Company’s operating subsidiary, Ambac Assurance Corporation. Ambac Assurance Corporation is subject to significant regulatory oversight by the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance of theState of Wisconsin, including the recent establishment and rehabilitation of a segregated account of Ambac Assurance Corporation. Additionally, the Company has limited liquidity. Such factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s abilityto continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Our report also refers to the change in the method ofaccounting for qualifying special purpose entities and variable interest entities due to the adoption of new accounting requirements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board as of January 1, 2010, the change in the method ofevaluating other-than-temporary impairments on securities due to the adoption of new accounting requirements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board as of April 1, 2009, and the change in method of accounting for financial guaranteecontracts due to the adoption of new accounting requirements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board as of January 1, 2009. Also our report refers to the fact that the Company began applying additional accounting and financialreporting guidance applicable to Debtors-in-Possession on November 8, 2010. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

New York, New York 

March 16, 2011
[Cite as Shaker Hts. v. El-Bey, 2017-Ohio-9022.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA 

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION 

Nos. 105701 and 105702

CITY OF SHAKER HEIGHTS

PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE 

vs. 

BRANDON PROFIT EL-BEY

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT 

JUDGMENT: 

AFFIRMED

Criminal Appeal from the 

Shaker Heights Municipal Court 

Case Nos. 17 TRD 01124 and 17 CRB 00154 

BEFORE: S. Gallagher, J., Kilbane, P.J., and Blackmon, J. 

RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: December 14, 2017 
FOR APPELLANT 

Brandon N. Profit El-Bey, pro se 

4115 E. 138th Street 

Cleveland, Ohio 44108 

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE

C. Randolph Keller 

City of Shaker Heights 

3400 Lee Road 

Shaker Heights, Ohio 44120 
SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J.: 

{¶1} This is an accelerated appeal brought pursuant to App.R. 11.1 and 

Loc.App.R. 11.1. Brandon Profit El-Bey appeals his convictions for operating a vehicle 

without a license, failing to stop at a stop sign, driving with expired or unlawful license 

plates, and carrying a concealed weapon. By designating this as an accelerated appeal, 

El-Bey has “agreed that we may render a decision in ‘brief and conclusionary form’ 

consistent with App.R. 11.1(E).” State v. D.F., 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 104410, 

2017-Ohio-534, ¶ 1. 

{¶2} El-Bey does not dispute that he violated several ordinances or the validity of 

the underlying convictions. Instead, El-Bey asserts that he is not subject to the Shaker 

Heights Codified Ordinances because he is a national of the “Tribal-Nation, United 

Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah Mu’urs.” 

{¶3} “Numerous courts have rejected similar challenges to convictions based on 

‘sovereign citizen’ or ‘sovereign nation’ arguments.” Shaker Hts. v. El-Bey, 8th Dist. 

Cuyahoga No. 104236, 2017-Ohio-929, ¶ 6, citing State v. Wyley, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 

102889, 2016-Ohio-1118, ¶ 6-7, 11-12; Garfield Hts. v. Foster, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 

102965, 2016-Ohio-2834, ¶ 9; State v. Few, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 25969, 

2015-Ohio-2292, ¶ 6; State v. Blacker, 12th Dist. Warren No. CA2008-07-094, 

2009-Ohio-5519, ¶ 7-10; St. Paris v. Galluzzo, 2d Dist. Champaign No. 2014-CA-29, 

2015-Ohio-3385, ¶ 46; State v. Matthews, 2d Dist. Greene No. 2015-CA-73, 
2016-Ohio-5055, ¶ 3-6; Friend v. Schatzman, M.D.N.C. No. 1:15CV231, 2015 U.S. Dist. 

LEXIS 36332, 3-5 (Mar. 24, 2015). 

{¶4} In light of the fact that El-Bey does not challenge the legal or factual basis of 

his convictions and seeks only to assert his status as a sovereign person as a means to 

avoid application of the Shaker Heights Codified Ordinances, a principle rejected by this 

and a majority of courts, we affirm. 

It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed. The 

court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal. 

It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the municipal

court to carry this judgment into execution. 

A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of 

the Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

SEAN C. GALLAGHER, JUDGE 

MARY EILEEN KILBANE, P.J., and 

PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J., CONCUR