alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30,1997 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          31,890
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,790
<PP&E>                                         985,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                (79,543)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,089,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          134,366
<BONDS>                                        557,195
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           353
<OTHER-SE>                                     433,326
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,089,705
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               288,065
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  232,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,214
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,456
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,854
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,602
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,602
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,As adopted pursuant toSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Quarterly Report of Park Bancorp, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2004, (the Report), I, David A. Remijas, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

/s/   David A. Remijas
David A. RemijasPresident and Chief Executive Officer

May 14, 2004

16

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          31,789
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      491
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,963,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                 106,757
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,093,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,688,328
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           468
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,126,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,093,388
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,093
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      496
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,233
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    275
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                267
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       267
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>5
<MULTIPLIER>1
       
<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         12760000
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   5369000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     105000
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               23177000
<PP&E>                                       1122522000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 37665000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1171577000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         473418000
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         383000
<OTHER-SE>                                    468375000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  468758000
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              102058000
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  82051000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             13798000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 6916000
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             6916000
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (25344000)
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (18428000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.49)



        






</TABLE>
Exhibit 12
  PHH
    CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
    COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
    (Dollars in Millions)
  Year Ended December 31,2009


2008


2007


2006


2005Earnings available to cover fixed charges:Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

$
280


$
(443
)

$
(45
)

$
(4
)

$
159Plus: fixed charges


243



344



492



477



360Earnings available to cover fixed charges

$
523


$
(99
)

$
447


$
473


$
519Fixed
    charges(1):Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing
    costs

$
236


$
333


$
480


$
465


$
348Interest portion of rental payment


7



11



12



12



12Total fixed charges

$
243


$
344


$
492


$
477


$
360Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


2.15x




(2)


0.91x
(2)


0.99x
(2)


1.44x     (1)
    
    Consists of interest expense on all
    indebtedness (including amortization of deferred financing
    costs) and the portion of operating lease rental expense that is
    representative of the interest factor.(2)
    
    Earnings were deficient to cover
    fixed charges by $443 million, $45 million and
    $4 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007
    and 2006, respectively. Loss from continuing operations before
    income taxes was negatively impacted by Valuation adjustments
    related to mortgage servicing rights, net of $733 million,
    $413 million and $479 million for the years ended
    December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. 181
Order filed, November 12, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00774-CR

____________

JOESPH LEE FIEDOR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1415457

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due October 17, 2014. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Louise Steckler, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                        458,834
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 723,180
<ALLOWANCES>                  12,000
<INVENTORY>                   119,788
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              2,012,940
<PP&E>                        1,613,772
<DEPRECIATION>                323,754
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                3,839,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,409,218
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         262,022
<PREFERRED>                   495,532
<COMMON>                      7,577,281
<OTHER-SE>                    (7,071,059)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  3,839,001
<SALES>                       1,661,886
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              2,094,446
<CGS>                         1,320,774
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 4,707,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            172,945
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (2,785,564)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (2,785,564)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (2,785,564)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.76)
        


</TABLE>
# C_2022093EN.01000301.xml

| 28.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10622 – GENSTAR CAPITAL / MDP / LIGHTSPEED)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 93/03)

On 22 February 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10622. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10622. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2022225EN.01000101.xml

| 9.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10579 – PON HOLDING / AUTOHAUS ADELBERT MOLL / FLEXXDRIVE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 225/01)

On 30 May 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10579. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10579. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2702 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2702

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to passenger motor 
      vehicle crash avoidance information, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2015

 Mr. Rokita (for himself and Mr. Blumenauer) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to passenger motor 
      vehicle crash avoidance information, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safety Through Informed Consumers 
Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. PASSENGER MOTOR VEHICLE INFORMATION.

    Section 32302 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Crash Avoidance.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of the Safety Through Informed Consumers Act of 2015, the 
Secretary shall ensure that crash avoidance information is provided 
next to, and in the same format as, crashworthiness information at each 
place that crashworthiness information is made available to the public 
under this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
AFS

- 10

- 279

- E September 4, 2013

Mr. Ron McCormick 5421 Horse Ridge Way Bonita, CA 91902

Dear Mr. McCormick:

We have received the May 6, 2013, petition for rulemaking that you posted to the Department of Transportation’s Federal Docket Management System (Docket No. FAA

- 2013

- 0428). Your petition seeks changes to powerplant installation and propulsion system fire protection standards, for example Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.863, and associated guidance provided in Advisory Circular No. 20

- 135.

You suggested p rescribing the use of metallic seals in lieu of elastomeric seals for fire barriers in areas that are exposed to operating temperatures above 500°F. You noted that elastomeric seals break down more readily under these conditions and require replacement in order to continue to serve as an effective fire seal, whereas metallic seals may be expected to remain effective much longer. You suggested there would be cost and environmental benefits in using metallic seals rather than elastomeric seals as well.

In d eveloping airworthiness standards, our goal is to establish performance based requirements to promote aviation safety that account for the broadest range of acceptable design approaches possible. In doing so, we try to avoid prescribing the design. Our obj ective is to establish and maintain an appropriate level of safety allowing practical design approaches while enabling innovation and technological advancement.

In your petition, you do raise points that should be considered by airplane designers,

manufac turers, and operators when determining the materials best suited to their needs and applications. Our performance based standards associated with powerplant installation and propulsion system fire protection enable manufacturers and operators to consider p oints such as these and make design decisions based on a wide range of factors including cost, maintenance, and environmental impact.

As a result, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has determined that the issues identified in your petition are not immediate safety concerns that require establishing new or revised standards. Budgetary constraints and the need to meet the demands of a changing2

complex aviation industry requires the FAA to dedicate its rulemaking resources to the most pressing proble ms and issues associated with safety. Therefore, we deny your request to petition for rulemaking.

Based on the above, we are closing Docket No. FAA

- 2013

- 0428. We will hold your comments and arguments for rule and guidance material change so that we ma y examine them if we consider future rulemaking and guidance.

Sincerely,

/s/

Dorenda D. Baker Director, Aircraft Certification Service
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 18




Board of Directors
Oshman's Sporting Goods, Inc.


        As stated in Note A to the consolidated financial statements of Oshman's
Sporting Goods, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") for the period ended 
January 31, 1998, the Company changed its accounting policy for store 
pre-opening costs. Management believes the newly adopted accounting principle is
preferable because there is no direct causal relationship between these expenses
and future revenues and to improve comparability with other companies in the 
industry. At your request, we have reviewed and discussed with management the 
circumstances, business judgment, and planning that formed the basis for making
this change in accounting principle.

        It should be recognized that professional standards have not been 
established for selecting among alternative principles that exist in this area 
or for evaluating the preferability of alternative accounting principles. 
Accordingly, we are furnishing this letter solely for purposes of the Company's 
compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and 
it should not be used or relied on for any other purpose.

        Based on our review and discussion, we concur with management's judgment
that the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances. 
In formulating this position, we are relying on management's business planning 
and judgment, which we do not find unreasonable.

Very truly yours,


GRANT THORNTON LLP
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

J.F., FATHER OF J.F., A CHILD,

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D23-0364

 LT Case No. 2021-DP-204 

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, 

Appellees. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed March 14, 2023 

Appeal from the Circuit Court, 

for Duval County, 

W. Collins Cooper, Judge.

Michael A. Tupper, of Tupper Law,

Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Sarah Rumph, of Children Legal 

Services, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

Morgan Lyle Weinstein, of Twig Trade 

& Tribunal, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, and 

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director 

of Appeals, and Krystle Celine Cacci, Senior 

Attorney, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

EDWARDS, HARRIS and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
#### HARRIS v. LESLIE, Chief Justice, et al.

Motion No. 12581.

Supreme Court of Texas.

July 22, 1936.

Kirby, King & Overshiner, of Abilene, for relator.

PER CURIAM.

' Relator seeks to compel by mandamus the honorable Court of Civil Appeals, Eleventh supreme judicial district, to certify to this court the following question: “Where the case was submitted to the jury on special issues, and the Appellant, plaintiff in the Court below, timely and properly objected in writing to the Court’s charge because of the Court’s failure to submit to the jury a material issue, necessary to his recovery of damages and on which there was a conflict of evidence, which objections were overruled by the Trial Court, to which action and ruling of the Court plaintiff excepted; but did not formulate an issue presenting the question and request the Court to submit such issue to the jury; was his objection and exception made as aforesaid sufficient to entitle him to a review by the Appellate Court of the alleged error of the Trial Court in failing to submit said issue?”

 The case before the Court of Civil Appeals out of which the question arose is Harris v. Thornton’s Department Store, 94 S.W.(2d) 849. The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals freely admits the conflict of decisions on the question, but follows the opinion of this court in Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Conley, 113 Tex. 472, 260 S.W. 561, 32 A.L.R. 1183. This court, as recently stated in Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. Gallagher, 94 S.W.(2d) 410, will not require the certification of a question which it has already decided, unless the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals on that question is contrary to the Supreme Court’s decision thereon. The decision of the Court of Civil Appeals being in harmony with the decision of this court in the Conley Case, supra, the motion for leave to file will be denied.