alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2701 

To direct the President to impose duties on merchandise from the People’s 

Republic of China in an amount equivalent to the estimated annual 

loss of revenue to holders of United States intellectual property rights 

as a result of violations of such intellectual property rights in China, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2015 

Mr. KING of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To direct the President to impose duties on merchandise 

from the People’s Republic of China in an amount equivalent to the estimated annual loss of revenue to holders 

of United States intellectual property rights as a result 

of violations of such intellectual property rights in China, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2701 IH

1 SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT ON VIOLATIONS OF 

2 UNITED STATES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 

3 RIGHTS IN CHINA. 

4 (a) STUDY.—The United States Trade Representa5 tive shall conduct an annual study to determine the esti6 mated annual loss of revenue to holders of United States 

7 intellectual property rights as a result of violations of such 

8 intellectual property rights in the People’s Republic of 

9 China. 

10 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

11 of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the 

12 United States Trade Representative shall submit to Con13 gress a report that contains the results of the study con14 ducted pursuant to subsection (a). 

15 SEC. 2. IMPOSITION OF DUTIES ON MERCHANDISE FROM 

16 CHINA AND DISTRIBUTION OF PROCEEDS OF 

17 SUCH DUTIES TO HOLDERS OF CERTAIN 

18 UNITED STATES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 

19 RIGHTS. 

20 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 

21 President, acting through the United States Trade Rep22 resentative, shall— 

23 (1) impose duties on merchandise from the Peo24 ple’s Republic of China in an amount equivalent to 

25 the estimated annual loss of revenue to holders of 

26 United States intellectual property rights as a result 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2701 IH

1 of violations of such intellectual property rights in 

2 China, as determined by the Trade Representative 

3 pursuant to the study conducted under section 1(a) 

4 and contained in the report submitted to Congress 

5 under section 1(b); and 

6 (2) provide for the distribution of the proceeds 

7 of such duties to holders of United States intellec8 tual property rights described in paragraph (1) on a 

9 proportional basis. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2022339EN.01000201.xml

| 5.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10861 – HG / TEAM.BLUE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 339/02)

On 29 August 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10861. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10861. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 10:21 AM

To: 'udroneair@yahoo.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - UdroneAir LLC

Dear Mr. Williams:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No.

FAA

− 2015

− 2230). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

• Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed set filming

from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 8/27/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
,„

Ur-4 k ;1tt-„,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

PR 06-0422

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF JOHN

C. BOYD

FILED

JUN 0 2 2020

Bowen Greenwood

O R D E of s

upreme 

State of Court Montana

John C. Boyd has petitioned the Court to waive the three-year test requirement for

the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) for purposes of his

application for admission by motion to the State Bar of Montana. By rule, applicants for

admission by motion must provide evidence of the requisite score on an MPRE taken

"within three years preceding the date of the application for admission." Rule IV.A.3,

Rules of Admission. Boyd passed the MPRE in 2010 when seeking admission to the

practice of law in Georgia. He was admitted to the Georgia Bar and, in 2015, was admitted

by motion to the practice of law in Washington. Boyd has practiced law continuously for

10 years "without any ethical or disciplinary action in any jurisdiction where licensed or

admitted to practice law." Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition ofJohn C. Boyd to waiye the three-year

test requirement for the MPRE for purpgses of his current application for admission by

motion to the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED.

The Clerk shall rnail a copy of this order to Petitioner and to the Administrator of

the Board of Bar Examiyrs at the State Bar of Montana.

DATED this?-- - day of June, 2020.

Chief Justice

06/02/2020

Case Number: PR 06-0422
' 7 4{2717

9,1 A4 2.11„ 

Justices

2
EXHIBIT 32.2

P&F INDUSTRIES, INC.    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of P&F Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph A. Molino, Jr., Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date March 30, 2009

/s/ JOSEPH A. MOLINO, JR. Joseph A. Molino, Jr. Principal Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

128733 Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver 128734 Marilyn Kelly (84) Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,

Justices THOMAS M. SHOAFF, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 128733, 128734 COA: 248606, 248609 Ingham CC: 99-090282-CZ GARY D. BALDWIN, former Personal Representative of the Estate of Duane V. Baldwin; MARY JO BALDWIN, former Co-Trustee of the Duan e V. Baldwin Trust, JACOBS MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., FFM CO., INC., DGM CORP., AGRICON, INC., STOCKBRIDGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP #1; STOCKBRIDGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP #2; STOCKBRIDGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP #3; STOCKBRIDGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP #4; and STOCKBRIDGE LIMI TED PARTNERSHIP #5,Defendants-CrossPlaintiffs-Counter Plaintiffs,

and

THOMAS E. WOODS, as successor Personal Representative of the Esta te of Duane V. Baldwin and as successor Trustee of the Duane V. Baldwin Trust, Defendants-Appellants,

and

BALDWIN SOD FARMS an d MARK BALDWIN,

Cross-Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/_______________________________________ __ 2

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of December 27, 2005 is considered , and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

l0320 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 27, 2006

Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 308 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-637, CP2024-646.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21318 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED
FROM  THE  UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF THE
COMPANY  FOR THE NINE  MONTHS  ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30,  1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH   UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         67,554
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,331
<INVENTORY>                                    5,226
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               90,398
<PP&E>                                         88,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                 34,627
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16,678
<BONDS>                                        140,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       108
<OTHER-SE>                                    (9,703)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,577
<SALES>                                        35,127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               35,127
<CGS>                                          15,214
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  16,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               16,496
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               5,845
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (14,242)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,247)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,247)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,247)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (2.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (2.70)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2842 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2842

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify individual 
                           income tax rates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2015

 Mr. Williams introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify individual 
                           income tax rates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Individual Rate Simplification Act 
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. SIMPLIFIED INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX RATES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by striking paragraphs (2) and (3), by redesignating 
paragraph (4) as paragraph (3), and by inserting after paragraph (1) 
the following new paragraph:
            ``(2) 20- and 30-percent rate brackets.--
                    ``(A) In general.--In the case of taxable years 
                beginning after December 31, 2015, the rate of tax 
                under subsections (a), (b), (c), and (d) on taxable 
                income which would (without regard to this paragraph) 
                be taxed at a rate over 15 percent shall be--
                            ``(i) 20 percent on taxable income not over 
                        $1,000,000, and
                            ``(ii) 30 percent on taxable income over 
                        $1,000,000.
                    ``(B) Inflation adjustment.--In prescribing the 
                tables under subsection (f) which apply with respect to 
                taxable years beginning after 2016, the $1,000,000 
                amount in subparagraph (A) shall be increased by an 
                amount equal to--
                            ``(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                            ``(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment 
                        determined under subsection (f)(3) for the 
                        calendar year in which the taxable year begins 
                        determined by substituting `calendar year 2015' 
                        for `calendar year 1992' in subparagraph (B) 
                        thereof.
                If any adjustment under the preceding sentence is not a 
                multiple of $100, such amount shall be rounded to the 
                next lowest multiple of $100.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 21.01
                                 -------------

                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                            OF PACIFIC ENTERPRISES
                            ----------------------


      Burney Mountain Power
      Central Plants, Inc.
      EcoTrans OEM Corporation
      Energy Alliance I
      Ensource
      FTM Sports Corporation
      Landfill Control Technologies
      Mammoth Geothermal Company
      Mammoth Power Company
      Mt. Lassen Power
      Pacific Enerchange
      Pacific Energy
      Pacific Energy Leasing
      Pacific Energy Resources Incorporated
      Pacific Enterprises
      Pacific Enterprises ABC Corporation
      Pacific Enterprises Commercial Loans, Inc.
      Pacific Enterprises Energy Management Services
      Pacific Enterprises Energy Services
      Pacific Enterprises International
      Pacific Enterprises International (Cayman I)
      Pacific Enterprises International (Cayman II)
      Pacific Enterprises International Argentina I
      Pacific Enterprises International Argentina II
      Pacific Enterprises International Holdings I
      Pacific Enterprises International Holdings II
      Pacific Enterprises International Indonesia
      Pacific Enterprises International Latin America
      Pacific Enterprises International Mexico I
      Pacific Enterprises International Mexico II
      Pacific Enterprises International Mexico III
      Pacific Enterprises Leasing Company
      Pacific Enterprises LNG Company
      Pacific Enterprises Oil Company
      Pacific Enterprises Oil Company (Canada)
      Pacific Enterprises Oil Company (USA)
      Pacific Enterprises Oil Company (Western)
      Pacific Gas Gathering Company
      Pacific Geothermal Company
      Pacific Hydropower Company
      Pacific Interstate Company
      Pacific Interstate Mojave Company
      Pacific Interstate Offshore Company
      Pacific Interstate Transmission Company
      Pacific Interstate Transmission Company (Arctic)
      Pacific Library Tower
      Pacific Lighting Corporation
      Pacific Lighting Gas Development Company



<PAGE>

      Pacific Lighting Land Company
      Pacific Lighting Real Estate Group
      Pacific Offshore Pipeline Company
      Pacific Oroville Power, Inc.
      Pacific Penobscot Power Company
      Pacific Power Plant Operations
      Pacific Recovery Corporation
      Pacific Synthetic Fuel Company
      Pacific Western Resources Company
      Pacific Wood Fuels Company
      Pacific Wood Services Company
      Pay'n Save Drug Stores, Incorporated
      PEI Mexico Service Corporation
      Penstock Power Company
      Presley RAC Finance Co., Inc.
      Presley-Home Mac Finance Co., Inc.
      Southern California Gas Company
      Southern California Gas Tower
      8309 Tujunga Avenue Corp.
#### HALL v. STATE.

No. 19214.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 17, 1937.

Landman & Landman, of Athens, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is forgery; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two .years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence of the evidence heard upon the trial, this court is unable to appraise the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

The judgment is a firmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JEFFREY L. STUMP, § § No. 202, 2019 Plaintiff Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § TOWN OF MIDDLETOWN, et al . § C.A. No. N17M-09-027 § Defendants Below, § Appellees. § Submitted: March 18, 2020 Decided: March 20, 2020
Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; VAUGHN , and TRAYNOR , Justices. ORDER
This 20 th day of March, 2020, afte r careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the final judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its April 8, 2019 opinion.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior
Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice
#### Cole OGLESBY v. STATE.

No. 14879.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 13, 1932.

Rehearing Denied June 22, 1932.

See, also, Newton v. State, 51 S.W.(2d) 590, 592.

Frank Judkins, of Eastland, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, P. J.

Theft is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

*590This is a companion case to Cole Oglesby v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 51 S.W.(2d) 587, recently decided. In tbis case the appellant was charged with the theft of the property described in the companion case mentioned, which was a conviction for burglary. The facts and the defensive theories are identical with those discussed in the companion ease, and, upon the authority of that ease, the judgment in the present appeal is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

LATTIMORE, J.

This is a companion case to Oglesby v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 51 S.W.(2d) 587, this day handed down, and in his motion for rehearing appellant presents only the same contention discussed and passed upon in said companion case. For the reason therein given, this motion is overruled.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: ____2013______-NM-_____129_____-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

M. SYLVIA BAIR, EXECUTRIX OF THE

ESTATE OF MARTHA A. EDWARDS,

DECEASED,

 Respondent

 v.

MANOR CARE OF ELIZABETHTOWN,

PA, LLC D/B/A MANORCARE HEALTH

SERVICES-ELIZABETHTOWN,

MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES,

INC., MANOR CARE, INC., HCR

MANORCARE, INC., HCR

HEALTHCARE, LLC, HCR II

HEALTHCARE, LLC, HCR III

HEALTHCARE, LLC, HCR IV

HEALTHCARE, LLC,

 Petitioners

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 118 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.