alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MONTGOMERY v. STATE.

No. 19652.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 11, 1938.

Carl Hollingsworth, of Pleasanton, and H. D. Barrow, of Jourdanton,- for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully carrying a pistol, and a fine of $100 imposed therefor.

There are no bills of exception in the record, and although the motion for a new trial complains of some of the rulings of the trial court and many remarks of the prosecuting attorney, such are not brought forward in proper bills, and we are unable to know what such supposed errors were.

.There were two witnesses who testified that appellant went into his house, obtained a pistol, came out of said house and across a public road, and fired his pistol into the ground. The court charged the jury that before they could convict the appellant they had to find that he carried such pistol on premises not his own.

The jury accepted the version of the two above referred to witnesses, and we see no reason for disturbing their verdict, and the judgment predicated thereon, and it is accordingly affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 177 (Thursday, September 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 74221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20627]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Notice of Meeting

    Per 45 CFR chapter XXI 2102.3, the next meeting of the U.S. 
Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for September 19, 2024, at 9:00 
a.m. and will be held via online videoconference. Items of discussion 
may include buildings, infrastructure, parks, memorials, and public 
art.
    Draft agendas, the link to register for the online public meeting, 
and additional information regarding the Commission are available on 
our website: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the agenda, as well as 
any public testimony, should be addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, 
U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address; by emailing 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e78481869493868181a7848186c9808891"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="accfcacddfd8cdcacaeccfcacd82cbc3da">[email protected]</span></a>; or by calling 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring 
sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact 
the Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.

    Dated: September 6, 2024 in Washington, DC.
Zakiya N. Walters,
Administrative Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-20627 Filed 9-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council

          - [Docket No. AS24-18]

# AGENCY:

Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

*Description:*                     In accordance with section 1104(b) of title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:                

*Location:*                     This will be a virtual meeting via Webex. Please visit the agency's homepage (                    *www.asc.gov*) and access the provided registration link in the News and Events section. You MUST register in advance to attend this Meeting.                

*Date:*                     September 25, 2024.                

*Time:*                     10:00 a.m. ET.                

*Status:*                     Open.                

## Reports

Chair

Executive Director

Delegated State Compliance Reviews

Grants Director

Financial Manager

Notation Vote

## Action and Discussion Items

Approval of Minutes—June 12, 2024 Quarterly Meeting Minutes

Policy on Monitoring and Reviewing the Appraisal Foundation

Fiscal Year 2025 ASC Budget Proposal

## How To Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting

                    The meeting will be open to the public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's homepage (                    *www.asc.gov*) and access the provided registration link in                           ( print page 75541)                        the News and Events section. The meeting space is intended to accommodate public attendees. However, if the space will not accommodate all requests, the ASC may refuse attendance on that reasonable basis. The use of any video or audio tape recording device, photographing device, or any other electronic or mechanical device designed for similar purposes is prohibited at ASC Meetings.                

Loretta Schuster,

Management & Program Analyst.

[FR Doc. 2024-20960 Filed 9-13-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001013149
<NAME> ICT GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                       1
<CASH>                                          19,114                      53
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,987                   9,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                       195                     666
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,211                  10,630
<PP&E>                                          18,823                  13,606
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,825                   6,545
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,681                  19,636
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,241                  13,213
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           115                      90
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,509                   2,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,681                  19,636
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,887                  36,079
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,906                  20,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,556                  14,418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   180                     132
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 302                     621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,057)                     752
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,208)                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,849)                     752
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,849)                     752
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.71)                    0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.71)                    0.04
        



</TABLE>
700 A.2d 262

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. William H. PROCTOR.

Misc. Docket AG, No. 4

Sept. Term, 1997.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Sept. 18, 1997.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Consent to Disbarment from the practice of law filed by William H. Proctor in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-712 d2, and the written recommendation of Bar Counsel, it is this *18th*day of September, 1997

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that William H. Proctor, be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of William H. Proctor from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-713, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.15

                       SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS
          WHICH ARE SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
                        ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT 10.14 TO THE
                               COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
                          FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 3/31/99




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                               DATE OF
FACILITY TYPE                         LOCATION                                          DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
-------------                        ---------                                          ---------------------
<S>                                   <C>                                                 <C> 
Clare Bridge                          Louisville, Colorado                                December 31, 1998

Clare Bridge                          Highland Ranch, Colorado                            December 31, 1998

Sterling Cottage                      Savannah, Georgia                                   December 31, 1998

Sterling House                        Raleigh, North Carolina                             December 31, 1998

Sterling Cottage                      Raleigh, North Carolina                             December 31, 1998

Sterling House                        Hilton Head, South Carolina                         December 31, 1998

Sterling Cottage                      Hilton Head, South Carolina                         December 31, 1998

Clare Bridge                          Brandon, Florida                                    December 31, 1998

Clare Bridge                          Brick Ocean, New Jersey                               March 31, 1999

Sterling House                        Florence, New Jersey                                  March 31, 1999

Clare Bridge                          Cape Coral, Florida                                   March 31, 1999

Clare Bridge                          Scottsdale, Arizona                                   March 31, 1999

Crossings                             Scottsdale, Arizona                                   March 31, 1999

Sterling Cottage                      Bakersfield, California                               March 31, 1999

Sterling House                        Bakersfield, California                               March 31, 1999

Clare Bridge                          Tropicana, Nevada                                     March 31, 1999
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21304]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 291 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-610, CP2024-618.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21304 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022075EN.01000601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 16.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/6 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10568 – IIF INTERNATIONAL HOLDING / G+E GETEC HOLDING)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 75/04)

1.

On 9 February 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022075EN.01000601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | IIF Int’l Holding L.P. (‘IIF’, Cayman Islands), controlled by three individuals (Mr Vumindaba Dube, Mr Henry Fayne and Mr Michael Nagle), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | G+E GETEC Holding GmbH (‘GETEC’, Germany). |

IIF will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of GETEC.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | IIF is an investment fund specialised in infrastructure investments, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | GETEC provides heating, cooling and electricity systems, and energy services in Germany, Italy, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Austria, Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Belgium and Luxembourg. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022075EN.01000601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10568 – IIF INTERNATIONAL HOLDING / G+E GETEC HOLDING

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022075EN.01000601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022075EN.01000601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
EXHIBIT 10.4
                                                                    ------------

                              DATAWATCH CORPORATION
                                 DESCRIPTION OF
                                   FISCAL 2005
                         EXECUTIVE SALES INCENTIVE PLAN



The plan provides for payment of a commission of 2% of any increase in the
revenues of desktop and server products, compared to the same period in fiscal
2004, to the Senior Vice President of Desktop & Server Products (John Kitchen)
and 1% of any increase in the revenues of enterprise products (including
Datawatch/ES, Visual/QSM and Visual/HD), compared to the same period in fiscal
2004, to the Senior Vice President of Enterprise Solutions (Calvin MacKay). The
plan is open-ended in value but closed into a fixed term for the 2005 fiscal
year ending September 30, 2005. The incentive payments will be measured and paid
on a quarterly basis, and the officer must remain an employee at the end of a
quarter to be eligible for a payment for the quarter.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 244 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 244

        To repeal the wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2017

Mr. Lee (for himself, Mr. Cruz, Mr. McCain, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Scott, Mr. 
     Flake, Mr. Perdue, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Alexander, and Mr. Rubio) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To repeal the wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Davis-Bacon Repeal Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DAVIS-BACON WAGE REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United 
States Code, is repealed.
    (b) Reference.--Any reference in any law to a requirement under 
subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code, shall be 
null and void.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND LIMITATION.

    Section 2, and the amendment made by such section, shall take 
effect 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act but shall not 
affect any contract that is--
            (1) in existence on the date that is 30 days after such 
        date of enactment; or
            (2) made pursuant to an invitation for bids outstanding on 
        the date that is 30 days after such date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  139,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,200
<INVENTORY>                                    197,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               365,100
<PP&E>                                         220,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 916,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          325,200
<BONDS>                                        247,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   916,200
<SALES>                                        199,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               199,400
<CGS>                                          180,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  180,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (47,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (47,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.31)
        

</TABLE>
#### McCLELLAND et al. v. MOTLEY et al.

No. 4214.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

Feb. 11, 1932.

Florence & Fulton,, of Gilmer, for appellants.

Wynne & Wynne, of Longview, for appel-lees.

LEVY, J.

(after stating the case as above).

 The principal points.made on appeal are that (1) no suit had been filed or was pending at the date the order was made appointing a receiver, and (2) the order appointing the receiver was made without notice to the defendants. The cases go to sustain the points presented. The commencement of a suit, by filing the petition with the clerk of the court as article 1971, R. S., provides shall be done, appears to be essential to the jurisdiction of the court to appoint a receiver. Webb v. Allen, 15 Tex. Civ. App. 605, 40 S. W. 342; Solomon v. Mathews (Tex. Civ. App.) 238 S. W. 307; Amason v. Harrigan (Tex. Civ. App.) 288 S. W. 566. The same cases, as well as others, appear to be applicable to the particular application as here made requiring notice thereof to be given to the parties affected.

The record requires that the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded, and it is accordingly so ordered.