alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                  13,704,730
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              13,704,730
<CASH>                                         472,547
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,246,726
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 11,294
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                869,205
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       183,642
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,723,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,246,726
<PREMIUMS>                                     121,273
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             21,304
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      33,489
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            54,601
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (44,521)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (15,137)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,384)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,384)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  13,373
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             33,849
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              35,568
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 11,294
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1



                                  June 17, 1999


Applied Analytical Industries, Inc.
5051 New Centre Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403

         Re:      PharmComm, Inc./Guarantee

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The undersigned acknowledges that Applied Analytical Industries, Inc. ("AAI") is
contemplating making an advance payment of $300,000.00 in cash (the "Advance
Payment") to PharmComm, Inc. ("PharmComm") for the provision by PharmComm to AAI
of certain document scanning services requested by AAI in the future. The
undersigned acknowledges that as a shareholder of PharmComm, the Advance Payment
indirectly benefits the undersigned and that AAI will be acting in reliance of
the undersigned's agreement set forth herein. Accordingly, the undersigned
hereby agrees unconditionally and absolutely to guarantee to AAI repayment to
AAI of the Advance Payment, reduced by the amount of scanning services provided
by PharmComm to AAI at AAI's request after the date hereof at a price of
$0.06176 per scanned page, in the event that either PharmComm fails to provide
scanning services requested by AAI or AAI terminates its relationship with
PharmComm and requests a return of the Advance Payment.

In connection with such guaranty obligation, the undersigned hereby waives (a)
notice of acceptance of this guaranty by AAI; (b) to the extent permitted by
applicable law, all other notices to which the undersigned might otherwise be
entitled; (c) demand for payment under this guaranty; and (d) any right to
assert against AAI, as a defense, counterclaim, set-off, or cross-claim any
defense (legal or equitable), set-off, counterclaim or claim that the
undersigned may now or hereafter have against AAI, other than compulsory
counterclaims. Furthermore, the undersigned agrees that this guaranty may be
enforced by AAI without the necessity at any time of resorting to or exhausting
any other right of recovery against PharmComm, and the undersigned hereby waives
the right to require AAI to proceed against PharmComm or to require AAI to
pursue any other remedy or enforce any other right. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, the undersigned hereby specifically waives the
benefits of North Carolina General Statutes. Sections 26-7 through 26-9
inclusive.


                                                Sincerely,


                                                /s/ Frederick D. Sancilio
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Frederick D. Sancilio, Ph. D.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2761 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2761

  To amend the Clean Air Act to clarify when a physical change in, or 
change in the method of operation of, a stationary source constitutes a 
                 modification, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2018

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Clean Air Act to clarify when a physical change in, or 
change in the method of operation of, a stationary source constitutes a 
                 modification, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF MODIFICATION.

    Section 111(a)(4) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7411(a)(4)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(4) The term `modification' means'' and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(4) Modification.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The term `modification' means''; 
                and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Associated definition.--For purposes of 
                subparagraph (A), a physical change in, or change in 
                the method of operation of, a stationary source shall 
                be considered to increase the amount of any air 
                pollutant emitted by the stationary source only if the 
                maximum achievable hourly emissions rate of the 
                stationary source after the change will be higher 
                than--
                            ``(i) the maximum achievable hourly 
                        emissions rate of the stationary source as the 
                        stationary source was originally designed; and
                            ``(ii) the maximum hourly emissions rate of 
                        the stationary source that was actually 
                        achieved during the 10-year period preceding 
                        the change.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2022044EN.01001701.xml

| 28.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/17

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10371 – SIBUR / TAIF)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 44/03)

On 30 September 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10371. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10371. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
                                              Exhibit 27

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1997, and the Consolidated
Statement of Income for the twelve months ended December 31, 1997, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      455,687
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    100,970
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          85,790
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        12,994
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 655,441
<COMMON>                                        58,655
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       35,196
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            116,305
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 210,156
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           18,000
<PREFERRED>                                     20,831
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           189,973
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               2,100
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   12,324
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 202,057
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  655,441
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      394,279
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            14,308
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     335,246
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     349,554
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         44,725
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               6,140
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  50,865
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        18,519
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,346
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,358
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   29,988
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        21,496
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       16,941
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          69,398
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.58


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.3



Statement of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Southern California Gas Company (the "Company") certifies that:



(i)

the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







February 26, 2008



/S/  Debra L. ReedDebra L. ReedChief Executive Officer
#### MORGAN v. STATE.

No. 21114.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 8, 1940.

Fred H. Woodard, of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Harvey M. Morgan was convicted in the District Court of Nueces County on a charge of murder upon which the jury assessed the penalty of 40 years.

On the 18th day of June, 1939, at about 2 o’clock on Sunday morning appellant was in the Causeway Gem at Corpus Christi dancing with a young lady. The dance music was furnished by a mechanical machine operated by depositing a nickel for each piece of music played. He furnished the young lady a nickel which she deposited and then refused to dance with him further. They had been dancing for some time and she claimed that she was too tired to dance longer, while, according to his story, she went to dance with another man. He protested to the proprietor of the place whose name was C. G. Squires.

Several witnesses were present who testified on the trial of the case and who heard, more or less, the things that were said. Appellant claimed that he demanded of Squires the repayment to him of the nickel which he had deposited, and that Squires cursed him and made a motion as if going to attack him. He hit Squires with his fist and knocked him to the floor. According to the testimony of the witnesses he then kicked his head and stomped him with his heels. The witnesses, including a doctor, testified to the injuries which produced immediate death. The lower front teeth had been knocked out; the left cheek bone broken, and the left eye lacerated so that it could hardly be discerned. Around it were several small lacerations. Blood was “oozing” from the nose and the left ear. The left jaw was broken.

The jury declined to take the testimony of appellant as to his self defense theory and accepted that of the State’s *796witnesses. It amply supported the verdict of the jury.

There is but one bill of exception in the case which complains of the court admitting in evidence for the purpose of considering the creditability of the appellant as a witness by proving on cross examination that he had been convicted for a felony in Hill County and charged with theft in Brown County. For such purpose, as limited by the court in admitting the same, this evidence was admissible. Branch’s Penal Code, 167, and the authorities there cited. This bill is not sustained.

We have carefully examined the record and find that the procedure by which appellant was indicted, arraigned and tried is regular. No question is brought to this court for review which indicates error and we find no fundamental error in the case.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
# CI2022055EN.01000101.xml

| 2.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 55/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 55/1

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10512 – LEAR CORPORATION / INTERIOR COMFORT SYSTEMS BUSINESS OF KONGSBERG AUTOMOTIVE GROUP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 55 I/01)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Lear Corporation (‘Lear’, USA), |
| --- | --- |

—

Lear Corporation (‘Lear’, USA),

| — | The interior comfort systems business of Kongsberg Automotive ASA (‘Interior comfort systems business of Kongsberg’, Norway). |
| --- | --- |

—

The interior comfort systems business of Kongsberg Automotive ASA (‘Interior comfort systems business of Kongsberg’, Norway).

Lear will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of the Interior comfort systems business of Kongsberg.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of assets and shares.

2.

| — | Lear: supplying automotive seating, wire harnesses and electronics to major automakers, |
| --- | --- |

—

Lear: supplying automotive seating, wire harnesses and electronics to major automakers,

| — | Interior comfort systems business of Kongsberg: designing, manufacturing and supplying seat heating, seat ventilation, lumbar support and massage equipment, panel heating, ancillary electronic units, and system components for passenger cars. |
| --- | --- |

—

Interior comfort systems business of Kongsberg: designing, manufacturing and supplying seat heating, seat ventilation, lumbar support and massage equipment, panel heating, ancillary electronic units, and system components for passenger cars.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10512 – LEAR CORPORATION / INTERIOR COMFORT SYSTEMS BUSINESS OF KONGSBERG AUTOMOTIVE GROUP

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
#### KINNEY-SHOTTS INVESTMENT COMPANY v. D. V. BROOKS COMPANY.

No. 1610-6503.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section B.

May 13, 1936.

Dawson H. Davis and Homer B. Green, both of Fort Worth, for plaintiff in error.

George E. Miller, of Fort Worth, for defendant in error.

SMEDLEY, Commissioner.

Plaintiff in error filed three suits against defendant in error in the county court at law of Tarrant county, in each of which recovery was sought upon a promissory note or notes in an amount within the court’s jurisdiction, with foreclosure of chattel mortgage upon an automobile given to secure the debt. Each petition failed to allege the value of the automobile. At the time each suit was filed, the plaintiff filed an affidavit for sequestration in which the value of the automobile was stated in an amount within the court’s jurisdiction. The three suits were consolidated for trial, and the amended petition filed after the order of consolidation did not allege the *133value of the automobiles. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff and remanded the cause. 58 S.W.(2d) 1062. The question presented is the same as that this day decided in Mrs. C. B. Brown et al. v. C. C. Peters, 94 S.W.(2d) 129, a companion case.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

All of the Company's subsidiaries are incorporated under the laws of the State
of Texas and operate under the name Oshman's unless otherwise indicated in
parentheses.  Each is qualified to do business in the state mentioned in its
name.  All are 100% owned by Oshman's Sporting Goods, Inc.

Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Alabama*
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Arizona (also operates as SuperSports USA)
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Arkansas*
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., California (also operates as SuperSports USA)
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Colorado*
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Connecticut*
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Florida (operates as SuperSports USA)
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Georgia
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Hawaii
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Kansas (operates as SuperSports USA)
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Louisiana
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Michigan (operates as SuperSports USA)
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Minnesota (operates as SuperSports USA)
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Missouri*
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Nevada
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., New Jersey
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., New Mexico (also operates as SuperSports USA)
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., New York*
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Ohio*
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Oklahoma (operates as SuperSports USA)
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Oregon*
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., South Carolina (operates as SuperSports USA)
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Tennessee
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Texas (Delaware) (also operates as SuperSports USA)
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Utah (operates as SuperSports USA)
Oshman Sporting Goods Co., Washington (operates as SuperSports USA)
Oshman's Sporting Goods, Inc. - Services (Delaware)
Oshman Ski Skool, Inc.*
J.S. Oshman and Co., Inc.
Oshitch Company*
The Best of Oshitch, District of Columbia*
Oshitch Company of Maryland, Inc.*
Oshitch Company of Virginia, Inc.*
Oshitch at Home, Inc.*
URAFAN Corp. (operates as URAFAN Corp.)*
__________
*  Indicates a currently inactive subsidiary.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JONES 
APPAREL GROUP, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED 
DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         129,024
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  172,528
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,303
<INVENTORY>                                    268,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               631,843
<PP&E>                                         232,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                  76,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,188,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,888
<BONDS>                                        264,757
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,154
<OTHER-SE>                                     593,195
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,188,672
<SALES>                                      1,669,432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,685,229
<CGS>                                        1,100,666
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,100,666
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               319,994
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   188
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,845
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                251,811
<INCOME-TAX>                                    96,947
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            154,864
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   154,864
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.47
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000662

13-DEC-2016

08:13 AM