alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DEATON v. STATE.

No. 19608.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 6, 1938.

Appeal Reinstated May 18, 1938.

J. M. Davenport, of San Angelo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for violation of the liquor law, Vernon's Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 1 et seq., by having liquor on the premises when the license only allowed the sale of beer. Punishment is assessed at a fine of $150.

The record fails to show that notice of appeal was given and entered upon the minutes of the trial court. In the absence of such a showing, this court is without jurisdiction to hear and determine matters sought to be presented for review. See Long v. State, 3 Tex.App. 321; Lenox v. State, 55 Tex.Cr.R. 259, 116 S.W. 816; Roberts v. State, 99 Tex.Cr.R. 492, 269 S.W. 103; article 827, C.C.P.

The attempted appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The appeal was dismissed at a former day because of the absence of a notice of appeal in the transcript. The record having been corrected by the filing of a certified copy of such notice, the appeal will now be reinstated.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

Appellant filed some exceptions to the charge of the court but presented no special charges relative thereto as is required in misdemeanor cases. In the absence of the statement of facts, this court is unable to appraise the complaints made of the charge of the trial court.

The appeal is reinstated and the judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             576
<SECURITIES>                                    14,271
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,057
<INVENTORY>                                     28,123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,381
<PP&E>                                         105,684
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 194,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,405
<BONDS>                                         31,665
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,015
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   194,049
<SALES>                                        177,819
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,819
<CGS>                                          114,718
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  114,718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                61,388
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,078)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (25)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,053)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,053)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.08)
        

</TABLE>
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2580 

To amend title 13, United States Code, to make clear that each decennial 

census, as required for the apportionment of Representatives in Congress 

among the several States, shall tabulate the total number of persons 

in each State, and to provide that no information regarding United 

States citizenship or immigration status may be elicited in any such 

census. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 20, 2018 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. BENNET, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mr. COONS, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. 

DURBIN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. HARRIS, Mr. MARKEY, Mrs. MURRAY, 

and Ms. SMITH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 13, United States Code, to make clear that 

each decennial census, as required for the apportionment 

of Representatives in Congress among the several States, 

shall tabulate the total number of persons in each State, 

and to provide that no information regarding United 

States citizenship or immigration status may be elicited 

in any such census. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2580 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Every Person Counts 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CENSUS DATA COLLECTION. 

5 (a) REQUIREMENT.—Section 141(b) of title 13, 

6 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘United 

7 States’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘United States, and 

8 shall tabulate the total number of persons in each State’’. 

9 (b) PROHIBITION.—Section 141(a) of title 13, United 

10 States Code, is amended in the second sentence by striking 

11 ‘‘as necessary’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘as necessary, 

12 except that the Secretary may not include any question 

13 or otherwise elicit any information regarding United 

14 States citizenship or immigration status’’. 

15 (c) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in sub16 section (a) or (b) shall be construed to— 

17 (1) permit or require the exclusion from any de18 cennial census of population (as defined in section 

19 141(g) of title 13, United States Code) of— 

20 (A) any person on the basis of age; 

21 (B) personnel in the Armed Forces (and 

22 their dependents) serving abroad; 

23 (C) Federal employees (and their depend24 ents) stationed abroad; or 

25 (D) any other persons outside of the 

26 United States (in addition to persons described 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2580 IS

1 in subparagraph (B) or (C)) who can be traced 

2 to the State of their usual place of residence, as 

3 determined by the Secretary of Commerce; or 

4 (2) affect the survey conducted by the Secretary 

5 of Commerce that is commonly referred to as the 

6 ‘‘American Community Survey’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         345,846
<SECURITIES>                                 2,480,631
<RECEIVABLES>                                  530,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,621,799
<PP&E>                                         130,496
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,417,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,273,688
<BONDS>                                        300,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           713
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,432,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,417,252
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,628,018
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,364,542
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,007
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                233,134
<INCOME-TAX>                                    90,945
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            142,189
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (20,558)
<NET-INCOME>                                   121,631
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.77


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.3



Statement of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (the "Company") certifies that:



(i)

the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







February 24, 2009



/S/  Debra L. ReedDebra L. ReedChief Executive Officer
# C_2022115EN.01000301.xml

| 11.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10570 – ADVENT / PERMIRA / MCAFEE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 115/03)

On 24 February 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10570. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10570. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### ALEXANDER v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INS. CO.

No. 2661.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Dec. 13, 1934.

W. R. Blain and David E. O’Fiel, both of Beaumont, for appellant.

Orgain, Carroll & Bell, of Beaumont, for appellee.

O’QUINN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Jefferson county, Sixtieth judicial district. The record was filed on the docket of this court on January 31,1934, and on June 29, 1934, was set for submission on December 6,1934. The ease is before us without briefs by either party, but appellee has filed its motion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. There is no excuse offered why briefs have not been filed. It is well settled that the failure of parties to an appeal, without good cause being shown, to file briefs in accordance with the rules prescribed by the Supreme Court and the statutes, authorizes the Court of Civil Appeals to dismiss the appeal without searching the record for fundamental error. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.(2d) 811: United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hardy (Tex. Civ. App.) 24 S.W.(2d) 462; Ferguson v. Harris County (Tex. Civ. App.) 42 S.W.(2d) 297; Yuba Oil Co. v. Williams (Tex. Civ. App.) 50 S.W.(2d) 416, 417.

As the motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution was duly filed and is here insisted upon, and the same being a legal right which appellee has to urge, the motion should be granted, and it is so ordered, and the appeal dismissed.
[No. 46759-0-I.

Division One.

October 23, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. George Washington, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 99-1-03017-2, Richard M. Ishikawa, J., entered May 26, 2000. *Remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
#### SELIGER v. STATE.

No. 20973.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 3, 1940.

E. T. Miller and Simpson, Dorenfield & Fullingim, all of Amarillo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is receiving and concealing stolen property; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for four years.

No statement of facts is brought forward. A certificate of the trial judge, in approving appellant’s bill of exception No. 2, conclusively shows that the failure to secure a statement of facts can not be charged to appellant. It is shown in the bill of exception that after appellant had been convicted he promptly made satisfactory arrangements with the court reporter for á statement of facts. Thereafter the court reporter was accidentally killed. He had not prepared a statement of facts in the case, and it is certified in the bill of exception that no other person was able to prepare such statement from the notes that he had taken during the trial. Neither the district attorney nor appellant’s counsel would undertake ■ to prepare a statement of facts from memory. The trial judge certifies that he did not keep any notes during the trial and could not and would not attempt to make up a statement of facts in the case. We quote in part from the court’s certificate, as follows: “The court certifies that without any fault or negligence on, the part of the defendant and his counsel, but due solely to the untimely and accidental death of J. Henry Cross, the official court reporter, the defendant and his counsel have been deprived of the statement of facts necessary to perfect their appeal, and have been deprived of data from which they could prepare bills of exception preserved by the defendant during his trial.”

It is apparent that appellant has been unable to obtain a statement of facts after using due diligence and that there has been no fault or negligence either on his part or on the part of his counsel. It follows that we are constrained to order a reversal of the judgment. See Brannan v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 611, 132 S.W.2d 594, and Little v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 164, 97 S.W.2d 479.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |  |  |
| Delaware                                       | 0-17948 | 94-2838567 |
| (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation) | (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| o      | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|   |   |
| o      | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|   |   |
| o      | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |
| o      | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
|   |   | ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. |
|   |   |   |   |
| Dated: | November 22, 2016 | By: | /s/ Jacob J. Schatz |
|   |   |   | Jacob J. Schatz |
|   |   |   | Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC.
         THE INTERPUBLIC NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS' STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
                                  ("the Plan")

                         FORM OF PLAN OPTION CERTIFICATE

          THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND SHOULD BE KEPT IN A SAFE PLACE
          -------------------------------------------------------------

THIS IS TO CERTIFY that, on the date shown below, an Option was granted, subject
to the Rules of the above-mentioned Plan, to the under-mentioned to subscribe at
the Exercise Price stated below the number of shares of Common Stock of The
Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. specified below.

Grantee:  Name:

Date of Grant:

Number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Option:

Exercise Price per share:  $

Option Expiration Date:

The Option may not be exercised in any part until [3 years from date of grant].
Thereafter the Option shall be exercisable in its entirety.


                    THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC.



                   By
                     ---------------------------------------





The foregoing grant of an Option Award
is hereby accepted on the terms
contained herein:



------------------------------
           Grantee
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2676 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2676

To permit certain disclosures of health information during emergencies, 
                          including overdoses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 16, 2018

Mr. Cassidy (for himself and Mr. Murphy) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit certain disclosures of health information during emergencies, 
                          including overdoses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Saving Lives Through Proper 
Notification of Overdoses Act''.

SEC. 2. COMMUNICATION WITH FAMILIES DURING EMERGENCIES.

    (a) Promoting Awareness of Authorized Disclosures During 
Emergencies.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall annually 
notify health care providers regarding permitted disclosures during 
emergencies, including overdoses, of certain health information to 
families and caregivers under Federal health care privacy laws and 
regulations.
    (b) Use of Material.--For the purposes of carrying out subsection 
(a), the Secretary of Health and Human Services may use material 
produced under section 11004 of the 21st Century Cures Act (42 U.S.C. 
1320d-2 note).
                                 <all>
```
SERVED JULY 26, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

ANTHONY TREMBLAY 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

· (Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0780 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

30 Cj: 3 0 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as ~ase No. 2012NE700040) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

Anthony Tremblay, Respondent 

5 Jade Road 

Merrimack, NH 03054 

ONE COPY 

Christopher Waterman, Respondent's Counsel 

Demeo & Associates, P.C. 

One Lewis Wharf · 

Boston, MA 02110 

TEL: 617-263-2600 

FAX: 617-263-2300 

Vincent J. Bennett, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ANE-7 

New England Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

12 New England Executive Park 

Burlington, MA 01803-5299 

TEL: 781-238-7058 

FAX: 781-238-7044 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0780 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

.. 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-