alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### TOMLIN v. STATE.

No. 18718.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 20, 1937.

J. M. Parker, of Gorman, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted under an indictment charging him with theft of cattle, and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts accompanies the record.

We find in the transcript the verdict of a jury finding appellant guilty and assessing the punishment heretofore indicated. So far as the transcript shows, no judgment was ever entered on the verdict. Neither does it show that sentence was ever pronounced against appellant.

Under the record now before us, it is imperative that the appeal be dismissed, and it is so ordered.
*OPINION ISSUED FEBRUARY 11, 2009*

#### JAMES MILLS AND SHARON MILLS VS. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

(CC-06-0247)

Claimants appeared *pro se.*

Andrew F. Tarr and Jason C. Workman, Attorneys at Law, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted to the Court for decision upon a Stipulation entered into by claimants and respondent wherein certain facts and circumstances of the claim were agreed to as follows:

1. Respondent is responsible for the maintenance of W.Va. Route 152, Wayne County.

2. Claimant alleges that on or around July 21, 2006, their property suffered flood damage as a result of clogged drains and culverts during a rain event.

3. For the purposes of settlement, respondent acknowledges culpability for the preceding incident.

4. Claimant and respondent believe that in this particular incident and under these particular circumstances that an award of five thousand five hundred eighty-two dollars and ninety-seven cents ($5,582.97) would be a fair and reasonable amount to settle this claim.

5. The parties to this claim agree that the total sum of five thousand five hundred eighty-two dollars and ninety-seven cents ($5,582.97) to be paid by respondent to the claimants in Claim No. CC-06-0247 will be a full and complete settlement, compromise, and resolution of all matters in controversy in said claim and full and complete satisfaction of any and all past and future claims claimants may have against *208respondent arising from the matters described in said claim.

The Court has reviewed the facts of the claim and finds that respondent was negligent in its maintenance of W.Va. Route 152 on the date of this incident; that the negligence of respondent was the proximate cause of the damages; and that the amount of the damages agreed to by the parties is fair and reasonable. Thus, claimants may make a recovery for their loss.

Accordingly, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award in the amount of $5,582.97.

Award of $5,582.97.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICT Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Brennan, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                        
|-------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|August 6, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    John J. Brennan 
|               |  |  |  | John J. Brennan        
|               |  |  |  | Chairman, President and
|               |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Marvinell Harlan v. Texas Department of Insurance, Division of 

Workers’ Compensation (TDI-DWC), Dr. Ikedinobi Eni, and 

Administrative Hearing Officer Jacque Coleman

Appellate case number: 01-14-00479-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-64138-A

Trial court: 190th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: August 17, 2016

Party filing motion: Appellant Marvinell Harlan

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Higley, Bland, and Massengale

Date: September 13, 2016
Opinion filed May 30 , 20 2 4



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________ No. 11

- 24

- 000 31

- CV

__________ FRANK RANDOLPH KELLY , INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE TRUSTEE OF THE FAMILY TRUST UNDER WILL OF MIKIE

LESLENE KELLY, AND LACY PAIGE BROOKS , Appellant s V. COBY TODD BAUSCH , Appellee

On Appeal from the 244th District Court Ector County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. C

- 23

- 10

- 1140

- CV

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N In this appeal, Appellant , Frank Randolph Kelly (Randy) , 1 complains that the trial court abused its discretion when it refused to dissolve a temporary injunction that was obtained by A ppellee , Coby Todd Bausch ( Todd )

. The injunction prohibits Randy from taking certain actions as trustee of a testamentary trust that was created by Mikie Lesl e ne Kelly.

1 Randy and Appellant Lacy Page Brooks filed a joint notice of appeal.2 We have today issued an opinion in Cause No. 11

- 24

- 00066

- CV , In re Frank Randol ph Kelly and Lacy Paige Brooks , in which we conditionally grant mandamus relief in the same underlying proceeding , concluding that the trial court abused its discretion when it failed to abate the district court proceedings in deference to a probate matter that is already pending in the Ector County Court at Law. If the trial court would have properly abated the underlying proceeding , the court should have suspended all proceedings therein , including the injunction , as a result of the ab atement

. See In re Discovery Operating, Inc ., 216 S.W.3d 898, 905 (Tex. App.

— Eastland 2007, no pet.) (abatement places a matter into a suspended state); Trapnell v. Hunter , 785 S.W.2d 426, 429 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi

– Edinburg 1990, no writ) (same); see also In re Kimball Hill Homes Tex., Inc ., 969 S.W.2d 522, 527 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.) (“An abatement is a present suspension of all proceedings in a suit

. ”). Accordingly, the district court abused its discretion when it failed t o abate the temporary injunction. We sustain the sole issue on appeal

. This Court’s Ruling We reverse the order of the trial court and remand this ca u se to the district court, where Todd’s claims for injunctive relief will be abated pending the resolutio n of the parties’ disputes in the Ector County C ourt at L aw.

JOHN M. BAILEY CHIEF JUSTICE

May 30 , 20 2 4 Panel consists of: Bailey , C.J., Trotter , J

. , a nd Williams , J.
# C_2022129EN.01001101.xml

| 22.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10459 – CVC / STOCK SPIRITS GROUP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 129/02)

On 15 November 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10459. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10459. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
From: Angus Crane [acrane@naima.org]

Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:15 PM

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Cc: Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov; Reeves, David

Subject: FW: Owens Corning Aerials

Attachments: Owens Corning Delmar Aerial with Stacks.pdf; Owens Corning Eloy Aerial with 

Stacks.pdf; Owens Corning Fairburn Aerial with Stacks.pdf; Owens Corning Kansas City Aerial with 

Stacks.pdf; Owens Corning Mt. Vernon Aerial with Stacks.pdf; Owens Corning Salt Lake City Aerial with 

Stacks.pdf; Owens Corning Santa Clara Aerial with Stacks.pdf; Owens Corning Waxahachie Aerial with 

Stacks.pdf; Owens Corning Newark Aerial with Stacks - Pipe.pdf; Owens Corning Newark Aerial with 

Stacks - Wool.pdf

Ms. Hancy,

Attached please find the aerial views (10) with furnace and FCC stacks marked along with stack ID’s for 

Owens Corning.

Please contact me if you have any questions.

Angus E. Crane

Executive Vice President, General Counsel

North American Insulation Manufacturers Association

Ph: (703) 684-0084 ext. 123

Fax: (703) 684-0427

Visit NAIMA online at:

www.NAIMA.org 

www.PipeInsulation.org 

Dear Angus,

Please find attached the aerial views (10) with furnace and FCC stacks marked along with stack ID’s as 

requested.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you for coordination of the responses.

Robin Edmiston-Bennett 

ISB Environmental Network Leader 

Fax: 419-325-9778 

Phone: 740-328-2479 

Cell: 740-323-6664
# Jurnalul Oficial C 265A/13 a

| | ISSN 1977-1029 |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | C 265A |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Comunicări şi informări | Anul 5813 august 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1029

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

C 265A

Ediţia în limba română

Comunicări şi informări

Anul 5813 august 2015

---

| Informarea nr. | Cuprins | Pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Anunţuri |
| | PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE |
| | Consiliu |
| 2015/C 265A/01 | Anunț de anulare | 1 |

Informarea nr.

Cuprins

Pagina

V   Anunţuri

PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE

Consiliu

2015/C 265A/01

Anunț de anulare

1

---

| RO | |
| --- | --- |

RO

---

V Anunţuri

PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE

Consiliu

| 13.8.2015 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | CA 265/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2015

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

CA 265/1

---

ANUNȚ DE ANULARE

(2015/C 265 A/01)

Procedura de selecție CONS/AD/113:

| — | Director, Serviciul juridic, Direcția 3 (Relații externe) |
| --- | --- |

—

Director, Serviciul juridic, Direcția 3 (Relații externe)

al cărei anunț a fost publicat în Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene
   (1) se anulează.

---

(1)  JO C 119 A, 14.4.2015, p. 18.

---
Exhibit 21.1



List of Subsidiaries of Paradyne Networks, Inc.



|                                     |  |                                                        
|------------------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Name                                 |  | Domestic or Foreign & State or Country of Incorporation
|Paradyne Corporation                 |  | Domestic - Delaware                                    
|Paradyne Canada, LTD                 |  | Foreign - Canada                                       
|Paradyne Networks do Brazil LTDA     |  | Foreign - Brazil                                       
|Paradyne International LTD           |  | Foreign  UK                                           
|Paradyne International Sales Ltd.    |  | Foreign  Barbados                                     
|Paradyne Worldwide Corp.             |  | Domestic - Delaware                                    
|Ark Electronic Products, Inc.        |  | Domestic - Florida                                     
|Communications Equipment Corporation |  | Domestic - Delaware                                    
|Paradyne Finance Corp.               |  | Domestic  Delaware                                    
|Paradyne Services, LLC               |  | Domestic Limited Liability Company 
Delaware          
|Elastic Networks Inc.                |  | Domestic  Delaware
EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by reference in the Registration Statements
(Numbers  333-25979,  333-69410 and 333-122575) on Form S-8 and the Registration
Statement(Number  333-130629)  on  Form  S-3  of  Orbit  International Corp. and
Subsidiaries  of  our  report  dated March 31, 2010 relating to our audit of the
consolidated  financial statements as of December 31, 2009 and for the year then
ended,  which  appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Orbit International
Corp.  and  Subsidiaries  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2009.





/S/ AMPER, POLITZINER & MATTIA, LLP

New  York, New  York
March  31,  2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,272
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,198
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,829
<PP&E>                                          44,136
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,536
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,750
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       (981)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,540
<SALES>                                         45,108
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,108
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,655
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   858
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,795
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    472
<INCOME-TAX>                                       104
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                368
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       368
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21358]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 10, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 341 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-653, CP2024-662.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21358 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-60092

KRISTEN LEWIS, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I; THE KROGER COMPANY, 

 Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:16-CV-724

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Kristen Lewis brought this premises liability suit 

against Kroger Co. and its related entity, alleging that Kroger was liable for 

her injuries after a slip-and-fall at one of their grocery stores. On Kroger’s 

motions, the district court struck an affidavit submitted by Lewis, finding that 

it directly contradicted her prior deposition testimony, and granted summary 

judgment for Kroger. Lewis timely appeals.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-60092 Document: 00514553891 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2018
No. 18-60092

2

Our careful review of the record, the parties’ briefs, and the district 

court’s ruling demonstrates no error in the district court’s decision. Though an 

affidavit that supplements or explains prior testimony can be admitted as 

evidence, the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that 

Lewis’ affidavit contradicted, rather than clarified, her prior deposition 

testimony. See, e.g., S.W.S. Erectors, Inc. v. Infax, Inc., 72 F.3d 489, 495–46 

(5th Cir. 1996). On consideration of the remaining evidence, we affirm the 

district court’s determination that no reasonable jury could find that Kroger 

either created a hazardous condition causing Lewis injury or had actual or 

constructive knowledge of such a condition. Vu v. Clayton, 765 So. 2d 1253,

1255 (Miss. 2000) (stating the requirements for a premises liability claim

under Mississippi law); see FED. R. CIV. P. 56(a). Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s judgment for essentially the same reasons stated by that court.

 Case: 18-60092 Document: 00514553891 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/13/2018
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-60702

Summary Calendar

_____________________

GEORGE POTTS, JR.

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PETE POPE; MIKE ROBICHAUX,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:94-CV-428-Br-R

October 29, 1998

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

George Potts, Jr., Mississippi prisoner #A13227, appeals from

the summary judgment granted defendants in his civil rights action.

(Potts’ motions to supplement the record, for appointment of

counsel, and for oral argument are DENIED.)

Potts contends that the defendants inflicted cruel and unusual

punishment by placing him in substandard living conditions

following a riot; and that he was deprived of his personal property

without due process of law. As for the punishment claim, we have
- 2 -

reviewed the record and the briefs and find no reversible error,

for essentially the reasons relied upon by the district court. See

Potts v. Pope, No. 1:94-CV-428-Br-R (S.D. Miss. Oct. 20, 1995).

Regarding the due process claim, a random unauthorized

deprivation of property does not violate due process if an adequate

post-deprivation remedy exists. Alexander v. Ieyoub, 62 F.3d 709,

712 (5th Cir. 1995). A deprivation pursuant to policy or other

authorization, however, may violate due process despite the

availability of such remedies. Id. at 712-13. On the other hand,

“[t]he necessity for quick action by the state coupled with an

adequate post-deprivation hearing [may] obviate[] the need for a

predeprivation hearing”. Beck v. Lynaugh, 842 F.2d 759, 761 (5th

Cir. 1988). Restated, the availability of post-deprivation

remedies satisfies due process when exigent circumstances exist

that allow a property seizure without a predeprivation hearing.

McQueen v. Vance, No. 95-50486, slip op. at 2-3 (5th Cir. Sep. 20,

1995)(precedential unpublished opinion).

Jail authorities acted legitimately to restore order and

ensure security when they seized prisoners’ personal property to

search for contraband. Under the circumstances, no predeprivation

process was necessary. In addition, Mississippi provides adequate

post-deprivation relief through legal actions in state court.

Nikens v. Melton, 38 F.3d 183, 185-8 (5th Cir. 1994); MISS. CODE ANN.

§ 11-38-1 (Supp. 1998). Because Potts had adequate postdeprivation remedies, there was no due process violation. 

AFFIRMED