AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed November 25, 2015.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 1 5 - 00 427 - CR No. 05 - 15 - 00428 - CR No. 05 - 15 - 00429 - CR HECTOR OMAR ROMERO , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F 12 - 71161 - H, F12 - 71361 - H, F12 - 71362 - H



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justice s Francis, Evans, and Stoddart Opinion b y Justic e Evans Hector Omar Romero appeals his convictions, following the ad judication of his guilt , for three offenses of third

- degree

- felony assault involving family violence
. . See T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 22.01(a)(1) , (b)(2)(A) (West Supp. 2015 ) (previous assault/family violence conviction) ; T EX . F AM . C ODE A NN . § § 71.0 0 21, 71.00 5 (West 20 14 & Supp. 201 5 ) . The trial court assessed punishment at eight years’ imprisonment in each case
. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which s he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requi rements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional- 2
-

evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811

– 12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978 ). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

– 21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief
. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 82 6

– 2 7 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases)
. We agree the appeals are frivolous and withou t merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal s . We affirm the trial court’s judgment s .

/s/ David Evans DAVID EVANS JUSTICE Do Not Publish T EX . R. A PP . P. 47 150427F.U05- 3
- 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dal las

JUDGMENT
HECTOR OMAR ROMERO , Appellant No. 05

- 1 5

- 00427

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F12

- 71161

- H ). Opinion delivered by Justice Evans , Justices Fran cis and Stoddart participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED
. Judgment entered this 25th day of Novemb er, 2015.- 4
- 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
HECTOR OMAR ROM ERO , Appellant No. 05

- 1 5

- 00428

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F12

- 71361

- H ). Opinion delivered by Justice Evans , Justices Francis and Stoddart participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED
. Judgment entered this 25th day of November, 2015.- 5
- 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
HECTOR OMAR ROMERO , Appellant No. 05

- 1 5

- 00429

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F12

- 71362

- H ). Opinion delivered by Justice Evans , Justices Francis and Stoddart participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED
. Judgment entered this 25th day of November , 2015.