alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022367EN.01001401.xml

| 26.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/14

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10840 – INFINIGATE / NUVIAS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 367/07)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Infinigate Holding AG (‘Infinigate’, Switzerland), ultimately controlled by Bridgepoint Group plc (UK), |
| --- | --- |

—

Infinigate Holding AG (‘Infinigate’, Switzerland), ultimately controlled by Bridgepoint Group plc (UK),

| — | RPE Investments Limited (‘RPE’, UK), ultimately controlled by Rigby Group (RG) plc (UK). |
| --- | --- |

—

RPE Investments Limited (‘RPE’, UK), ultimately controlled by Rigby Group (RG) plc (UK).

Infinigate will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of RPE.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Infinigate is a wholesale distributor of IT products with a focus on cybersecurity products (including firewalls, VPN gateways, intrusion detection and prevention systems, encryption, virus protection, email and content security solutions, and cloud-enabled security solutions) in Western-Europe, |
| --- | --- |

—

Infinigate is a wholesale distributor of IT products with a focus on cybersecurity products (including firewalls, VPN gateways, intrusion detection and prevention systems, encryption, virus protection, email and content security solutions, and cloud-enabled security solutions) in Western-Europe,

| — | RPE is the holding company of the Nuvias Group (‘Nuvias’), which consists of Nuvias Group Ltd. (UK) and Nuvias UC Overseas Limited (UK). Nuvias is a wholesale distributor of IT products, with a focus on cybersecurity products and networking solutions in Western-Europe. |
| --- | --- |

—

RPE is the holding company of the Nuvias Group (‘Nuvias’), which consists of Nuvias Group Ltd. (UK) and Nuvias UC Overseas Limited (UK). Nuvias is a wholesale distributor of IT products, with a focus on cybersecurity products and networking solutions in Western-Europe.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10840 – INFINIGATE / NUVIAS

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2688 

To block any action from being taken to finalize or give effect to a certain 

proposed rule governing the Federal child support enforcement program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2015 

Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin (for himself and Mr. BOUSTANY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To block any action from being taken to finalize or give 

effect to a certain proposed rule governing the Federal 

child support enforcement program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON TAKING ANY ACTION TO FI4 NALIZE OR GIVE EFFECT TO CERTAIN PRO5 POSED RULE GOVERNING THE FEDERAL 

6 CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec8 retary of Health and Human Services may not take any 

9 action to finalize, implement, enforce, or otherwise give ef10 fect to the proposed rule, entitled ‘‘Flexibility, Efficiency, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2688 IH

1 and Modernization in Child Support Enforcement Pro2 grams’’ (79 FR 68548–68587, November 17, 2014), or 

3 any proposal set forth in the proposed rule. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SE PTEMBER 11, 2013

NO. 03

- 11

- 00455

- CR

Dustin Anthony Simmang, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTIC E JONES, JUSTICES RO SE AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error requiring reversal in t he trial

court’s judgments of conviction : IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the

Court that the trial court’s judgments of conviction are in all things affirmed; and it appearing

that the appellant is indige nt and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made;

and that this decision be certified below for observance.
#### RODRIGUEZ v. STATE.

No. 21175.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 29, 1940.

Jake Jay Reich, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*859BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was convicted in the County Court at Law No. 2 of Bexar County on a charge of aggravated assault and given a penalty of one year in the county jail upon the verdict of a jury.

We have examined the record in the case and the proceedings appear to he in all respects regular. We find no statement of facts and no hills of exception presenting any matter for the consideration of this court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 336 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-679, CP2024-688.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21373 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Larry G. Stambaugh, Chief Executive Officer of Maxim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 12th day of February, 2003.

| |  | /s/LARRY G. STAMBAUGHLarry G. Stambaugh,Chief Executive
Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 19 , 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00345

- CV

LONGTIN'S PIPE & STE EL, INC. D/B/A U.S. CENTRAL PIPELINE SER VICES, Appellant

V.

ETC CANYON PIPELINE, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008

- 63720



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 9, 2012. On July 13, 2012, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.2

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, McCally , and Busby.3
Exhibit (99)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Annual Report of Owens Corning (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, David T. Brown, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ David T. Brown
Chief Executive Officer

April 4, 2003

This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Owens Corning and will be retained by Owens Corning and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32(a)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of IBW Financial Corporation. for
the quarter ended September 30, 2003, I, B. Doyle Mitchell, Jr., President and
Chief Executive Officer of IBW Financial Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of IBW Financial Corporation.

/s/ B. Doyle Mitchell, Jr.
---------------------------------------------
B. Doyle Mitchell, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PAUL N. CLARK PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of ICOS Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Paul N. Clark, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 11, 2005



| |  |                                      
| |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ PAUL N. CLARK                    
| |  | Paul N. Clark                        
| |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors,  
| |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022446EN.01003101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 24.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 446/31 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10931 – OPENTEXT / MICRO FOCUS)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 446/07)

1.

On 14 November 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022446EN.01003101-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Open Text Corporation (‘OpenText’, Canada), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Micro Focus International plc (‘Micro Focus’, UK). |

OpenText will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Micro Focus.

The concentration is accomplished by way of public bid announced on 25 August 2022.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | OpenText is a provider of information management products and services, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Micro Focus is a provider of enterprise software. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022446EN.01003101-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10931 – OPENTEXT / MICRO FOCUS

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022446EN.01003101-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022446EN.01003101-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
# C_2022122EN.01003101.xml

| 17.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/31

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10447 – NN / METLIFE GREECE / METLIFE POLAND)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 122/08)

On 7 December 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10447. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10447. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 24(c)





January 15, 2001




Mr. Alan M. Wright and
Mr. Thomas A. McNish
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company
5444 Westheimer Court
Houston, TX 77056-5310

Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company is required to file an Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 with the Securities and Exchange
Commission within 90 days after the end of the year.

We hereby make, constitute and appoint each of you our true and lawful attorney
for each of us and in each of our names, places and steads to sign and cause to
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission said Annual Report with any
necessary exhibits, and any amendments thereto that may be required.

Very truly yours,




 /s/William T. McCormick, Jr.
-----------------------------------
William T. McCormick, Jr.




 /s/William J. Haener
-----------------------------------
William J. Haener




 /s/Alan M. Wright
-----------------------------------
Alan M. Wright
UNITED STATES
                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 8-K
                                CURRENT REPORT
  Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                       Date of Report November 11, 1998

                            SBI Communications, Inc
           (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 ..........................................................................

         Delaware                  0-28416             58-1700840
(State or other jurisdiction     (Commission          (IRS Employer
      of incorporation)           File Number)        Identification)

                   .P. O. Box 729 - Leesburg, Georgia 31763
             (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

                                (912) 759-9176
              Registrant's telephone number, including area code
 ..........................................................................

The company's board of directors accepted the resignation of Mr.
Mel Ray as director as of September 10, 1998.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                      10,400,583
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,357,520
<ALLOWANCES>                                   898,648
<INVENTORY>                                 42,196,303
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            88,880,719
<PP&E>                                      99,518,820
<DEPRECIATION>                              51,491,491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             149,996,525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,953,877
<BONDS>                                      1,717,193
<COMMON>                                    16,510,402
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  99,252,563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               149,996,525
<SALES>                                    209,723,562
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           210,951,412
<CGS>                                      168,142,885
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              168,142,885
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,648,691
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               439,480
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              59,753
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             23,660,603
<INCOME-TAX>                                 9,628,540
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         14,032,063
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,032,063
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.85
        

</TABLE>
Dismissed and Opinion Filed February 9, 2018 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-17-01395-CV

AT&T INC. AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A AT&T TEXAS, Appellants V. ANDREA CHRISTIAN AND AMBER HICKS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-08124



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, J ustice Lang-Miers, and Justice St oddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Seeking to appeal the trial court’s denial of their rule 91a mo tion to dismiss a baseless
claim, appellants have filed a petition for permissive interloc utory appeal. We deny the petition
and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN . §
51.014(d) (West Supp. 2017); Te x. R. App. P. 28.3, 42.3(a).

171395F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

AT&T INC. AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A AT&T TEXAS, Appellants

No. 05-17-01395-CV V.

ANDREA CHRISTIAN AND AMBER HICKS, Appellees On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-08124. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appe al is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.

It is ORDERED that appellees ANDREA CHRISTI AN AND AMBER HICKS recover their costs of this appeal from appellants AT&T INC. AND SOUTHW ESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A AT&T TEXAS.

Judgment entered February 9, 2018