alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### TEAL v. STATE.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 2, 1938.

For former opinion, see 120 S.W.2d 94.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant requests leave to file a second motion for rehearing, and in connection therewith furnishes the court with a supplemental transcript which shows the verdict of the jury to have been as follows:

> “We, the Jury, find the defendant guilty as charged in the first count in the information and assess her punishment by fine of $100.00 One Hundred Dollars.

> “S. H. Keeton, Foreman.

> “We, the Jury, find the defendant guilty as charged in the second count in the information and assess her punishment by fine of $100.00 One Hundred Dollars.

> “S. H. Keeton, Foreman.

> “We, the Jury, find the defendant guilty as charged in the third count in the information and assess her punishment by fine of $100.00 One Hundred Dollars.

> “S. H. Keeton, Foreman.”

We confess our inability to see the difference in the legal effect of the verdict in the form here presented than if it had stated that “We, the jury, find the defendant guilty as charged in the first, second and third counts in the information,” and assessed her punishment by a fine of one hundred dollars in each count, aggregating the sum of three hundred dollars. In any eveqt, it appears to be a general verdict and we can see no objection thereto.

Request "to file second motion for rehearing is denied.
### -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

34 36 38 40 42 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/10 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 10 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.56 N 76.20 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00227-CV

J-W POWER COMPANY, Appellant

V.

WISE COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT 

AND WISE COUNTY APPRAISAL 

REVIEW BOARD, Appellees

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 271st District 

Court

of Wise County (TX13071)

March 2, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant J-W Power Company shall pay all costs of 

this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**P&F INDUSTRIES,INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of P&F Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph A. Molino, Jr.,Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| March 30, 2007 |   | /s/ JOSEPH A.  MOLINO, JR. |
|---------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
| Date                |   | Joseph A. Molino, Jr.      |
|                |   | Principal Financial Officer     |

 

----
|   | 1. | The                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of                1934. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To                my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,                in                all material respects the financial condition and results of operations                of                Union National as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the                Report. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                         |   |   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| By     | /s/              Mark D.              Gainer |   |   |        |
|   | Chairman/President/CEO                       |   |   |        |
|   |                                         |   |   |   |
|   | Date: March 28, 2007                         |   |   |   |

|   |                                                     |   |   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| By     | /s/                Clement M.                Hoober, CPA |   |   |        |
|   | Treasurer/CFO                                            |   |   |        |
|   |                                                     |   |   |   |
|   | Date: March 28, 2007                                     |   |   |   |

----
# C_2022063EN.01000301.xml

| 7.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10539 – SOUTH32 / KGHM / SIERRA GORDA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 63/03)

On 31 January 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10539. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10539. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #20637 and #20638; VERMONT Disaster Number VT-20005]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Vermont (FEMA-4816-DR), dated 09/10/2024. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         06/22/2024 through 06/24/2024.
 DATES: Issued on 09/10/2024. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/12/2024. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date*: 06/10/2025.
 ADDRESSES: *Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*
                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanessa Morgan, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/10/2024, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications online using the MySBA Loan Portal 
                    *https://lending.sba.gov*
                     or other locally announced locations. Please contact the SBA disaster assistance customer service center by email at 
                    *disastercustomerservice@sba.gov*
                     or by phone at 1-800-659-2955 for further assistance. The following area has been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Lamoille. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 206376 and for economic injury is 206380. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Francisco Sánchez, Jr., Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.


[FR Doc. 2024-21245 Filed 9-17-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-72,411-18

IN RE DAMON TREMA YNE WILSO N, Relat or

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 28362 IN THE 3RD DIST RICT COURT

F ROM AND ERSON COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this Court’s orig inal jurisdiction. He contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in Ander son County

and his applica tion has not been prope rly forwa rded to this Court. Respondent, the District Clerk of Ander son County , shall forwa rd Relator’s habea s application to this Court, respond that Relator has not filed a habea s application in Ander son County , or forwa rd a copy of an order desig nating issues toge ther with corr espondenc e documenting the date the State rec eived Relator’s habea s application. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(c) and (d); T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 5). This motion for leave to file will be held. Respondent shall comply with this order within thirty day s from the da

te of this order

.2

Filed: Dec ember 11, 2019 Do not publish
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JANUARY 5, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 10-12671 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 Agency No. 13462-09

LARRY R. BRADSHAW,

lllllllllllllllllllll Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

llllllllllllllllll lllRespondent - Appellee.

________________________

 Petition for Review of a Decision of the

 United States Tax Court

 ________________________

(January 5, 2011)

Before BARKETT, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Larry R. Bradshaw, proceeding pro se, appeals the decision by the tax court
finding him liable for deficiencies in income tax for the years 2004, 2005, and

2006, as well as for penalties for his failure to file income tax returns and pay

estimated taxes. Bradshaw does not contest the tax itself, but nonetheless avers

that he should not be required to pay. After a thorough review of the record, we

reject this argument and affirm.

We review the decision of the tax court’s factual findings for clear error and

its legal conclusions de novo. Estate of Whitt v. Commissioner, 751 F.2d 1548,

1556 (11th Cir. 1985). The Commissioner’s determination of a deficiency is

presumed correct and the taxpayer has the burden of proving by a preponderance

of the evidence that it is incorrect. Id. A taxpayer’s bank deposits provide prima

facia evidence of income, and the taxpayer has the burden of proving that the bank

deposits are not taxable income. Tokarski v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 74, 77

(1986).

Bradshaw concedes on appeal that the underlying tax is lawful, and

additionally he does not offer evidence disputing that he received the allegedly

taxable income. Accordingly, he has abandoned any claim of error with respect to

the tax court’s determination of the tax. See Marek v. Singletary, 62 F.3d 1295,

1298 n.2 (11th Cir. 1995) (“Issues not clearly raised in the briefs are considered

abandoned.”). Instead, Bradshaw attacks the fairness and integrity of the IRS

2
officials who effected the tax as well as of the tax court that reviewed his

challenge. However, Mr. Bradshaw fails to support his significant assertions with

evidence. As such, we reject them, and affirm the decision of the tax court, which

properly concluded that Bradshaw has failed to adduce evidence disputing the

prima facia case established through his bank deposits. See Tokarski, 87 T.C. at

76.

For these reasons, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

3
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00289

- CV

C ITY OF F OREST H ILL

, Appellant

V

.

J ON C HEESBRO

, Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 17th District

Court

of Tarrant County (017

- 300244

- 18)

February 28, 2019

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in the trial court’s order denying City of Forest Hill’s plea to the jurisdiction

.

It is ordered that the order of the trial court i s reversed

, and the case is remanded to

the trial court for further proceedings.

It is further ordered that each party shall bear their own costs of this appeal, for

which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
P 812.482.9650 1103 Main Street www.DCADC.org

F 812.482.9421 Jasper, Indiana 47546 jdinkle @DCADC.org March 19, 2012 The Honorable Ray

L aHood, Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey , S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 - 0001 RE: Docket DOT - OST - 2000 - 7182 Dear Secretary

L aHood: The Dubois County

Area Development Corporation is pleased to offer its support to the efforts of Frontier Airlines Inc. to initiate new nonstop jet service between Louisville, KY (SDF) and Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA). Frontier’s proposal brings important competition to one our region’ s top air service routes, expands the availability

of low fares in the Louisville market and significantly expands our region’s access to a top destination for business and leisure activities. We have found the region around Louisville and Southern Indian a to be an excellent place in which to do business and we believe that competitive jet service to the nation’s capital will greatl y enhance service and improve options available when traveling from Louisville International Airport. We strongl y encourage th e Department of Transportation to approve Frontier’s proposal for new low - cost, large jet air service between Louisville and Washington DC. Sincerel y, James W. Dinkle President
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 3RD DISTRICT COURT OF HENDERSON COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 27th

day of February, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF RUSTY BURNETT ABNEY AND SANDEE 

CAPRICE ABNEY AND IN THE INTEREST OF BREEANA CAPRICE ABNEY AND 

BRITTON STANLEY ABNEY, CHILDREN

NO. 12-14-00243-CV; Trial Court No. 2013C-0589

By per curiam opinion.

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, 

it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, 

and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of prosecution; and that this decision be certified to 

the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 12th day of May, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
# C_2022104EN.01000101.xml

| 4.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10567 – ACE / MOSADEX / PHARMALOT COMPOUNDING)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 104/01)

On 16 February 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in Dutch language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10567. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10567. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21245]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20637 and #20638; VERMONT Disaster Number VT-
20005]

Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Vermont

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Vermont (FEMA-
4816-DR), dated 09/10/2024.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 06/22/2024 through 06/24/2024.

DATES: Issued on 09/10/2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/12/2024.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/10/2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanessa Morgan, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 09/10/2024, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications online using the MySBA Loan 
Portal https://lending.sba.gov or other locally announced locations. 
Please contact the SBA disaster assistance customer service center by 
email at [email protected] or by phone at 1-800-659-2955 
for further assistance.
    The following area has been determined to be adversely affected by 
the disaster:

Primary Counties: Lamoille.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      3.250
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.250
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.250
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 206376 
and for economic injury is 206380.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-21245 Filed 9-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```
Exhibit (11)
                                                     ------------

                  OWENS CORNING AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

      FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997


Basic:
-----
<TABLE>
<S>                                    <C>      <C>       <C>

                                      1999      1998      1997
                                      ----      ----      ----
                                      (In millions of dollars,
                                         except share data)

Net income (loss)                    $  270   $  (705)  $   47
                                     ======   ========  ======
Basic weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding
  (thousands)                        54,083    53,579   52,860
                                     ======   ========  ======

Basic per share amount               $4.98    $(13.16)  $  .89
                                     ======   ========  ======

Diluted:
--------

Net income (loss)                    $  270   $ (705)   $   47
                                     ======   =======   ======
Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding (thousands)            54,697   53,579    52,860
Weighted average common equivalent
  shares (thousands):
    Deferred awards                     189        -       352
    Stock options using the
     average market price during
     the period                           -        -       334
    Shares from assumed conversion
     of preferred securities          4,566        -         -
                                     ------   ------    ------
Diluted weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding and
 common equivalent shares
 (thousands)                         59,452   53,579    53,546
                                     ======   =======   ======

Diluted per share amount             $4.67    $(13.16)  $  .88
                                     ======   =======   ======



</TABLE>