alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WALTER CONNALLY *&*CO. v. BROWNING.

No. 11833.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.

June 2, 1934.

*413McDonald & Smith, of Tyler, for appellant.

E. H. Sigler, of Athens, for appellee.

BOND, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the county court of Henderson county overruling appellant’s motion to dissolve a temporary injunction, restraining the sale of personal property levied upon hy a writ of execution issued out of a justice court of Smith county in favor of the judgment creditor, Walter Connally. & Co., and against the judgment debtor, T. C. Browning, to satisfy a judgment in the sum of $73.83.

The injunction was granted on appellee’s petition, alleging that the property levied upon and threatened to he sold was the property of the relator, J. H. Browning, and that the sale of the property would cause him “irreparable injury and damage, and for which he had no adequate remedy at law.” Appellant’s answer, under oath, embraces a general denial, and 'specifically attacks the ownership of the property as being in J. H. Browning, and sought the dissolution of the temporary injunction. The court, without the hearing of evidence and on the allegations of the petition, overruled appellant’s motion to dissolve. This appeal is predicated on the contention that the petition is insufficient for the injunctive relief; thus the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion to dissolve. We agree with the contention of appellant.

The petition does not disclose how and in what manner the relator will suffer irreparable injury hy the levy of the execution and the >sale of the property. The averment that he will do so is merely a conclusion of the pleader, finding no support whatever in the petition. The ownership of the property is the only issue raised hy the petition, for that he has a clear and adequate statutory remedy (article 7402 et seq., E. S.).

In the case of Berwald’s, Inc., v. Brown, 69 S.W.(2d) 221, 222, we had occasion to state our view in a case of this nature; i. e., “It was not the intention of the Legislature, in enacting the injunction statutes, that there should be two remedies, one at law and the other in equity, but, in our blended system of practice, both may be joined in the same cause of action, and the equitable jurisdiction of our courts extends to matters which might he otherwise beyond provisional statutory powers.” In the case at bar, no reason is shown why appellee did not resort to his legal remedy by affidavit and claim bond to try the right to the property levied upon; the case involves only the taking of personal property unattended by any other circumstance as to call for the exercise of the equitable jurisdiction of the court; thus injunctive relief is unauthorized; he has the provisional statutory remedy to try the right to the property taken under the writ of execution.

We therefore conclude that the trial court erred in granting the injunction and in refusing appellant’s motion to dissolve. Judgment of the lower court is reversed and here rendered, dissolving the injunction.

Eeversed and rendered; injunction dissolved.
#### BUNCH v. STATE.

No. 18567.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 12, 1936.

A. A. Dawson, of Canton, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*193MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully driving an automobile while intoxicated; penalty assessed at a fine of $50, and the driving privilege suspended for one year.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence of the facts, we are unable to appraise the complaint of the refusal of the court to continue the case.

Perceiving no fault in the proceedings which would justify this court in disturbing the judgment, it is therefore affirmed.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022123EN.01004401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/44 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10657 - SAMSUNG BIOLOGICS / SAMSUNG BIOEPIS)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 123/08)

1.

On 11 March 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022123EN.01004401-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Samsung BioLogics Co. Ltd. (‘Samsung BioLogics’, South Korea), a company controlled by the Samsung Group (South Korea), and |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Samsung Bioepis Co. Ltd. (‘Bioepis, South Korea’), a company currently jointly controlled by Biogen Therapeutics Inc. (USA) and Samsung BioLogics. |

Samsung BioLogics will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Bioepis.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Samsung BioLogics is a company active in the development and manufacturing of biopharmaceutical products worldwide. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Bioepis is a company active in the development and commercialisation of biosimilar medicines. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022123EN.01004401-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10657 - SAMSUNG BIOLOGICS / SAMSUNG BIOEPIS

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022123EN.01004401-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022123EN.01004401-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
# C_2022444EN.01000201.xml

| 23.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 444/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 444/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10854 – GIC INVESTOR / KIA / OMERS / DCLI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 444/02)

On 8 November 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10854. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10854. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
150 SOUTH NINTH STREET ELCENTRO. CA 92243-2850 

### AIR POL1

September 17,2007 TELEPHONE: (760) 482-4606 FAX: (760) 353-9904 

### DISTRICT

Mr. SeanHogan Technical Support Office (Air-7) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94 105
Dear Mr. Hogan: On April 12 and June 5, 2007, the Imperial County air monitoring stations recorded PM 10 concentrations in excess of the State 24-hour PM 10 standard of 50 pg/m3 and the Federal 24-hour PMlO standard of 150 pg/m3. Some of the evidence collected so far suggests that excessive high winds coupled with abnormally dry conditions of the soils are most likely the facts that contributed to these exceedances which meet the criteria for natural events exclusion. Please keep this letter for your records as it serves as formal notification ofthe events that took place on April 12 and June 5, 2007. The Imperial County Air Pollution Control District will be generating and submitting a Natural Event Documentation Reports for each incident within the next couple of months.
If you have any questions or require any further information, please contact me at (760) 482-4606. Sincerely,

Ernmanuel Sanchez Air Pollution Control Specialist

CC: Karen Magliano, Chief Planning and Technical Support Division California Air Resources Board 1001

### I Street Sacramento, CA 958 14

AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER

-.Bob Pollarino Technical Support Office (Air-7) U.S.Envoronmental Protection Agency Region 

### IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94 105
Robert 

### D. Fletcher Planning and Technical Support Division California Air Resources Board 1001 

### I Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Sylvia Morrow Planning and Technical Support Division CaliforniaAir Resources Board 1001 

### I Street Sacramento, CA 95814
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 179 (Monday, September 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 75628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20914]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12538]


Notice of Renewal of Advisory Committee Charter

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State has renewed the Charter of the U.S. 
National Commission for the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and 
Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Mungai, U.S. Department of State, 
Telephone: (202) 663-2407; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cc81b9a2abada59c8cbfb8adb8a9e2aba3ba"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c38eb6ada4a2aa9383b0b7a2b7a6eda4acb5">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, 
which operates pursuant to 22 U.S. Code 287o and the requirements of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), is a Federal Advisory 
Committee that provides recommendations to the U.S. Department of 
State.
    The Commission's recommendations relate to the formulation and 
implementation of U.S. policy towards UNESCO on matters of education, 
science, culture, and communication and information. Also, the 
Commission functions as a liaison with organizations, institutions, and 
individuals in the United States interested in the work of UNESCO.
    The Commission is comprised of representatives of American 
organizations and institutions which have an interest in education, 
science, communications and culture, including professional 
associations, educational institutions, and non-governmental 
organizations (NGOs), as well as representatives of federal, state and 
local governments, and at-large individuals. The Commission meets to 
provide information on UNESCO related topics and make recommendations.

Kevin E. Bryant,
Deputy Director, Office of Directives Management, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-20914 Filed 9-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
N / E / W / S  R / E / L / E / A / S / E














November 18, 2015








FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


For more information, contact:


David L. Ortega, First Vice President/Director of Investor Relations


765-378-8937


http://www.firstmerchants.com





SOURCE: First Merchants Corporation (NASDAQ: FRME), Muncie, Indiana








FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION ANNOUNCES CASH DIVIDEND





First Merchants Corporation declared a cash dividend on November 17, 2015 of $0.11 per share, payable on December 18, 2015 to shareholders of record on December 4, 2015.  For purposes of broker trading, the ex-date of the cash dividend is December 2, 2015.

















About First Merchants Corporation:





First Merchants Corporation is a financial holding company headquartered in Muncie, Indiana. The Corporation is comprised of First Merchants Bank, N.A., which also operates as Lafayette Bank & Trust and First Merchants Trust Company as divisions of First Merchants Bank, N.A.





First Merchants Corporation’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market System under the symbol FRME. Quotations are carried in daily newspapers and can be found on the company’s Internet web page ( http://www.firstmerchants.com ).





FIRST MERCHANTS and the Shield Logo are federally registered trademarks of First Merchants Corporation.





* * * *
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76456-76457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21128]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XE286]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (Council) Summer 
Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Advisory Panel will hold a public 
meeting, jointly with the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission's 
Summer Flounder, Scup and Black Sea Bass Advisory Panel.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, October 3, 2024, from 3 
p.m. until 4:30 p.m. For agenda details, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar. Connection information 
will be posted prior to the meeting at www.mafmc.org.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this meeting is for the 
Advisory Panel to review and provide comments on the draft Summer 
Flounder Commercial Mesh Size Exemptions Framework/Addendum. The review 
will cover the alternatives under consideration and a preliminary

[[Page 76457]]

overview of public comments collected during the previous public 
comment period. The document includes proposed revisions to two 
exemptions related to the summer flounder commercial minimum mesh size 
requirements: (1) the Small Mesh Exemption Program (SMEP), and (2) the 
flynet exemption. The Advisory Panel will provide input and 
recommendations to the Council and the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries 
Commission's Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Board (Board) on 
the draft alternatives prior to the Council and Board taking final 
action at the Commission's Annual Meeting in October.
    Additional information, including background documents, can be 
found on the Council's website at: https://www.mafmc.org/.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: September 12, 2024.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-21128 Filed 9-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
Exhibit (99)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Annual Report of Owens Corning (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Michael H. Thaman, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Michael H. ThamanChief
Financial Officer

April 4, 2003

This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Owens Corning and will be retained by Owens Corning and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

I,  Javier O. Lamoso, the president of ClearComm,L.P., certify that (i) the June 30, 2005 10-Q/A Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the June 30, 2004 10-Q/AReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of ClearComm, L.P.

 

 
|   | /s/  Javier O. Lamoso |   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|
|   | Javier  O. Lamoso     |   |
|   | President             |   |
|   | August 24,  2005 |   |

 

----
#### STRICKLAND v. STATE.

No. 21041.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 1, 1940.

Evans J. Adkins, of Brady, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for the theft of one head of cattle and his punishment as*795sessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

On the 15th day of July, 1939, appellant went to a cold storage plant in the town of Brady, with the carcass of a beef which he placed on storage and sold to them a hide of the same size as the carcass. Upon inspection later, this hide proved to have the brand of J. S. Wall, the prosecuting witness. Appellant also sold the carcass of the animal to another party who paid him $29 for it.

There is found in the transcript the signed statement of the appellant to the effect that he found the animal from which the hide came, dead and swollen, in the McShan pasture adjoining that of Wall; that he took the hide from this animal and carried it to the market at about the same time that he placed the carcass of another animal in storage there. He said in said statement that he thereafter burned the carcass of the dead animal. However, as a witness in the case he told a different statement, and it is sufficient to say that there is evidence to amply support the finding of the jury.

The record is without bills of exception and places nothing further before us for consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2774 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to prohibit recovery of certain 

overpayments through tax refund offsets and to prohibit the application 

of the earnings test with respect to child’s insurance benefits, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2015 

Mr. BUCHANAN (for himself and Mr. BLUMENAUER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to prohibit 

recovery of certain overpayments through tax refund offsets and to prohibit the application of the earnings test 

with respect to child’s insurance benefits, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Punishing Inno5 cent Taxpayers Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2774 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON RECOVERY OF CERTAIN OVER2 PAYMENTS. 

3 Section 204(a)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 

4 U.S.C. 404(a)(1)(A)) is amended by inserting after ‘‘sec5 tion 3720A of title 31, United States Code’’ the following: 

6 ‘‘(except that recovery by such means of reduction in tax 

7 refunds or by any other means may not be used with re8 spect to any payment to a person who had not attained 

9 the age of 18 at the time such payment was made)’’. 

10 SEC. 3. RESTRICTION ON APPLICATION OF EARNINGS TEST 

11 WITH RESPECT TO CHILD’S INSURANCE BEN12 EFITS. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 203(f)(8) of such Act (42 

14 U.S.C. 403(f)(8)) is amended by adding at the end the 

15 following new subparagraph: 

16 ‘‘(F) Notwithstanding any other provision 

17 of this subsection, no deductions in benefits 

18 shall be made under subsection (b) with respect 

19 to the earnings of any individual in any month 

20 in which the individual is entitled to a child’s 

21 insurance benefit under section 202(d).’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

23 this section shall apply with respect to taxable years end24 ing after December 31, 2015. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### REED v. STATE.

No. 20556.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 14, 1939.

E. T. Adams, of Glen Rose, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for-the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for possession of liquor in dry area for purpose of sale. Punishment is assessed at a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The information is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by tha Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.