alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

2:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 19, 2024.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: September 12, 2024.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-21117 Filed 9-12-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### BURLESON v. BURLESON.

No. 8792.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

March 15, 1939.

John D. Hartman, of San Antonio, for plaintiff in error.

. N. C. Walker, of San Saba, and Allan V. McDonnell, of Waco, for defendant in error.

BLAIR, Justice.

The parties will be designated as appellant and appellee. Appellant, Jennie May Burleson, instituted this proceeding against appellee, Richard C. Burleson, in the nature of a bill of review to set aside a judgment granting her a divorce, rendered at a former term of the same court, and which had become final.

In April, 1935, appellee, Richard C. Burleson, instituted an action for divorce against appellant, Jennie May Burleson; the cause being returnable to the April term, 1935, of the District Court of San Saba County, but was continued and tried *677at the November term, 1936, of said court. The trial resulted in a jury verdict denying appellee, Richard C. Burleson a divorce. This verdict was set aside on the ground of misconduct of the jury and other errors, and a new trial granted. In April, 1937, the cause again came on for trial, at which time appellant, Jennie May Burleson, filed a cross action for divorce. This trial, in April, 1937, resulted in a decree of divorce granted to appellant, Jennie May Burleson upon her cross action, and division of properties. No motion for new trial was filed and no appeal was prosecuted from this judgment. Later and after the term of the court had expired and the judgment had become final, appellant, Jennie May Burleson, filed and instituted, on September 27, 1937, this proceeding in the nature of a hill of review to set aside and vacate the judgment of divorce which had been granted her upon her cross action at the April term of said court. The pleading to set aside and vacate the judgment was signed by appellant, Jennie. May Burleson, in her proper person; but on the hearing of the same both she and other counsel employed by her appeared.

The petition for review of the former judgment is voluminous and very indefinite. Generally, it attempts to set aside the former judgment because the defense of insanity was not set up in some manner as against either spouse obtaining a divorce ; and charged her attorneys with fraud, collusion, and misrepresentation in filing her cross action for divorce, knowing her nervous and mental state, and in not securing an order of the court to place her under “observation and a judgment as to her sanity before submitting to a trial.” Appellant further alleged that she did not want a divorce on her cross action.

The trial court sustained several special exceptions and demurrers to the petition, upon the ground that same was too vague and indefinite to present ( any issue of insanity or fraud of her counsel; and upon counsel for appellant refusing to amend, dismissed the petition for a review of the former judgment.

We have carefully examined the petition and find that the trial court correctly sustained the exceptions and demurrers, and correctly dismissed the petition for review of the former judgment.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 52
          - [EPA-R05-OAR-2021-0544; FRL-12175-03-R5]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; extension of public comment period.

# SUMMARY:

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is extending the comment period for a proposed rule published August 30, 2024. The current comment period for the proposed rule was set to end on September 30, 2024. In response to a request in a public comment, EPA is extending the comment period for the proposed action to October 15, 2024.

# DATES:

The comment period for the proposed rule published on August 30, 2024, at 89 FR 71124 is extended. Comments must be received on or before October 15, 2024.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-2021-0544 at                         *https://www.regulations.gov,*                         or via email to                         *langman.michael@epa.gov.*                         Additional instructions to comment can be found in the notice of proposed rulemaking published August 30, 2024 (89 FR 71124).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Alisa Liu, Air and Radiation Division (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6524,                         *liu.alisa@epa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On August 21, 2024, EPA proposed to approve the Regional Haze State Implementation Plan revision submitted by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency on July 30, 2021, as satisfying applicable requirements under the Clean Air Act and EPA's Regional Haze Rule for the program's second implementation period. In response to a request in a public comment, EPA is extending the comment period for 15 days.

Dated: September 13, 2024.

Debra Shore,

Regional Administrator, Region 5.

[FR Doc. 2024-21267 Filed 9-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 18
- 00811
- CV

M. M. G., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 200TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- AG
- 17
- 000013 , HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JU DGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
M.M.G. appeals from the trial court’s decree terminating his parental rights to
his children , E.M.A

. - G

. and E.A

. - G. 1 Following a bench trial, the trial court found by clear and convincing evidence th at a statutory ground for terminating his parental rights existed and that termination of those rights was in the children’s best interest. See Tex. Fam. Code § 161.001(b)(1)(O), (2).

On appeal, M.M.G.’s court

- appointed attorney has filed a motion to w ithdraw and

a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Taylor v. Texas Dep’t of Protective & Regulatory Servs. , 160 S.W.3d 641,
646

- 47 (Tex. App.

— Austin 2005, pet. denied) (applyi ng Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights). The brief meets the requirements of Anders by presenting a

1 We refer to appellant, who is the father of the children, a nd to the children by their initials only. See Tex. Fam. Code § 109.002(d); Tex. R. App. P. 9

. 8.2

professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. See 386 U.S. at 744; Taylor , 160 S.W.3d at 646

- 47. Appellant’s counsel has certified to this Court that she provided M.M.G. with a copy of the Anders brief and motion to withdraw as counsel and informed him of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. To date, M.M.G. has not filed a pro se brief. The Department of Family and Protective Services has filed a response to the Anders brief, stating that it will not file a re sponse unless this Court requests one.

Upon receiving an Anders brief, we must conduct a full examination of all of the proceedings to determine whether the appeal is wholly frivolous. Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). We have reviewed the entire record, including the Anders brief submitted on
M.M.G

. ’s behalf, and hav e found nothing that would arguably support an appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s decree terminating M.M.G.’s parental rights. We deny counsel’s
motion to withdraw. 2

__________________________________________ Chari L. Kelly, Justice Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith Affirmed Filed: May 10, 2019

2 See In re P.M. , 520 S .W.3d 24 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam). In In re P.M. , the Texas Supreme Court held that the right to counsel in suits seeking the termina tion of parental rights extends “to all proceedings in [the Texas Supreme Court], including the filing of a petition for review. ” Id . at 27. Accordingly, counsel’s obligation to M.M.G. has not yet been discharged. See id. If M.M.G., after consulting wi th counsel, desires to file a petition for review, counsel should timely file with the Texas Supreme Court “a petition for review that satisfies the standards for an Anders brief.” See id. at 27

- 28.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21325]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 334 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-633, CP2024-642.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21325 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. As the company’s sole certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thecompany’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: April 11, 2011 /s/ Robert McCullough Jr.   Robert McCullough Jr.   Chief Executive Officer and
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Acceptance Insurance Companies Inc. and Subsidiaries


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-53730 and No. 33-68856 on Form S-3 and in Registration Statements No.
33-07397,  No. 33-67180 and No. 33-51441 on Form S-8 of Acceptance
Insurance Companies Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 9,
2001 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Acceptance Insurance
Companies Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2000.





/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
March 30, 2001
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 19910.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 21, 1940.

Samuel K. Wasaff and Charles Owen, both of El Paso, for appellant.

Roy D. Jackson, Dist. Atty., and Harold S. Long, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of El Paso, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder in El Paso County, Texas, and after the motion for new trial was overruled and notice of appeal given, upon proper showing before the court in which he was previously tried appellant was found to have become *856insane pending said appeal, and was committed to the Veterans Hospital at Waco, Texas.

When the appeal was submitted to this court on November 30, 1938 a motion was presented suggesting that further proceedings in the case 'should be suspended under the provisions of Art. 925, C.C.P., and the Clerk of this Court was directed to retire the case from the docket until it should 'be properly shown to this court that appellant had been tried and found to be sane.

It is now made known to this court that appellant died on April 27, 1939. In order that the case may be finally disposed of so far as the docket -of this court is concerned the Clerk is directed to re-docket the case, and it is now ordered that the appeal be abated on account of the death of appellant.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STEVEN HAMMOCK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1836

[October 13, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Dan L. Vaughn, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 312014CF000328A.

Steven Hammock, Crawfordville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Bradley v. State, 3 So. 3d 1168, 1168–69 (Fla. 2009).

GROSS, LEVINE and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
 ITEM 6. EXHIBITS





EXHIBIT-32





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Merchants Corporation (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2017 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael C. Rechin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





Date: November 9, 2017


by /s/ Michael C. Rechin


Michael C. Rechin


President and


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)





A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to First Merchants Corporation and will be retained by First Merchants Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




















_____________________________________________________




















In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Merchants Corporation (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2017 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark K. Hardwick, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation, do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





Date: November 9, 2017


by /s/ Mark K. Hardwick


Mark K. Hardwick


Executive Vice President,


Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to First Merchants Corporation and will be retained by First Merchants Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         644,032
<SECURITIES>                                 2,565,221
<RECEIVABLES>                                  488,104
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,885,154
<PP&E>                                         130,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,634,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,462,310
<BONDS>                                        501,827
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           714
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,266,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,634,473
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,519,531
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,119,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,249
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,693
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                358,148
<INCOME-TAX>                                   139,726
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            218,422
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (20,558)
<NET-INCOME>                                   197,864
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.89


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of SCPIE Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: August 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald J. Zuk                    
|                      |  |  |  | Donald J. Zuk Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.