alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 3.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                     RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                       ALTERNATIVE LIVING SERVICES, INC.

     ALTERNATIVE LIVING SERVICES, INC. (the "Corporation"), a corporation
organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware, does hereby certify:

     FIRST:  That, the Board of Directors of the Corporation unanimously
adopted resolutions setting forth a proposed amendment to the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, declaring said amendment to be
advisable, and directing that said amendment be presented to the stockholders
of the Corporation for consideration at the annual meeting of the stockholders.
The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

           "RESOLVED, that the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
      the Corporation be amended by deleting the first paragraph of
      Article Four in its entirety and by substituting the following in
      lieu thereof:

                                 ARTICLE FOURTH

                 The total number of shares of all classes of
            stock which the Corporation has authority to issue is
            One Hundred Five Million (105,000,000), of which One
            Hundred Million (100,000,000) shall be common stock,
            with $.01 par value (the "Common Stock"); and Five
            Million (5,000,000) shall be preferred stock, with
            $.01 par value (the "Preferred Stock").

     SECOND:  That at the annual meeting of the Corporation held on May 14,
1998, the foregoing resolution was adopted by holders of a majority of the
outstanding stock entitled to vote thereon.

     THIRD:  That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware:

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ALTERNATIVE LIVING SERVICES, INC. has caused this
certificate to be signed as of this 14th day of May, 1998.



                                 ALTERNATIVE LIVING SERVICES, INC.
                            By:
                                 William F. Lasky, its Chief Executive Officer







Attested by:


        Thomas E. Komula, its Secretary









                                       13
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,376
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,723
<PP&E>                                          11,072
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,699
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               97
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           328
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,422)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,850
<SALES>                                         13,754
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,754
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,327
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 220
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    993
<INCOME-TAX>                                        38
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                955
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       955
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Smith Barney  Mid-West  Futures Fund
L.P. II (the  "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, David J. Vogel, President of Smith Barney Futures Management LLC,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Partnership.


/s/ David J.Vogel
David J. Vogel
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2547 

To provide assistance for educational facilities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2018 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself and Mr. CASSIDY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide assistance for educational facilities, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consolidating Losses 

5 Associated to Severe Storms Act of 2018’’ or the ‘‘CLASS 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE FOR EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES. 

8 (a) COVERED EDUCATIONAL FACILITY DEFINED.— 

9 In this section, the term ‘‘covered educational facility’’ 

10 means a public facility or private nonprofit facility that— 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2547 IS

1 (1) is an educational facility; and 

2 (2) is located in a State or insular area for 

3 which more than 1 flood-related major disaster was 

4 declared under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Re5 lief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 

6 et seq.) during calendar years 2016 and 2017. 

7 (b) ASSISTANCE.—For purposes of a reduction of 

8 Federal assistance under section 406(d) of the Robert T. 

9 Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 

10 (42 U.S.C. 5172(d)), in the case of a campus with more 

11 than 1 covered educational facility, the reduction amount 

12 determined under such section 406(d) shall be applied to 

13 the repair, restoration, reconstruction, and replacement 

14 costs and associated expenses of only 1 covered edu15 cational facility on the campus. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 10, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 323 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-659, CP2024-668.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21351 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### TIDAL OIL CO. et al. v. GRAYS et al.

Nos. 1374, 1375.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Nov. 17, 1932.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 16, 1933.

For former opinion, see 54 S.W.(2d) 1043.

Thompson, Mitchell, Thompson & Young, of St. Louis, Mo., Hiner & Pannill, of Fort Worth, Witt, Terrell & Witt, of Waco, Y. P. Broome, of Tulsa, Okl., and Allen & Morton, of Fort Worth, for appellants.

Tom P. Scott and Carlton Smith, both of Waco, and Joe Ingraham, of Fort Worth, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Tidal Oil Company and Shell Petroleum Company, prosecuted separate appeals from interlocutory orders overruling their pleas of privilege and appointing a receiver herein. Said appeals were consolidated. This court, on the 17th day of November, 1932, reversed the order of the court overruling appellants’ pleas of privilege, set aside the order appointing a receiver, and ordered the cause remanded for further proceedings. See Tidal Oil Co. v. Grays, 54 S.W.(2d) 1043. Appellants filed motions for rehearing, which were overruled December 22, 1932. Thereafter, on January 17,1933, each of the named appellants filed its motion asking this court to certify certain questions of law involved in the appeal to the Supreme Court for determination. The motions to certify were granted, and this court, to preserve its jurisdiction over such appeals, set aside its orders overruling said motions for rehearing and held the same in abeyance awaiting the action of the Supreme Court on the questions which were certified. The Supreme Court, on the 23d day of June, 1933, adopted an opinion prepared by the Commission of Appeals in response to the questions certified. See Shell Petroleum Corporation et al. v. Grays et al., 62 S.W.(2d) 113. Motion for rehearing having been overruled, said opinion has been certified to this court. The trial court will be governed by said opinion in all further proceedings in this cause.

Appellants’ pending motions for rehearing are overruled.
|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |  |
| INDIANA                                        | 35-1544218 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

----
#### PATTERSON v. STATE.

No. 20369.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 19, 1939.

M. E. Gales, of Huntsville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge. .

The offense is aiding a prisoner to escape; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record fails to show that appellant gave notice of appeal. In the absence of such notice this court is without jurisdiction..

Attention is called to the fact that no indictment is disclosed by the transcript.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2772 

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to modify 

provisions relating to the household water well system grant program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2018 

Mr. BOOKER (for himself, Mrs. CAPITO, and Mr. JONES) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development 

Act to modify provisions relating to the household water 

well system grant program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HOUSEHOLD WATER WELL SYSTEM GRANT 

4 PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS. 

5 Section 306E of the Consolidated Farm and Rural 

6 Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1926e) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking the section designation and 

8 heading and inserting the following: 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2772 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 306E. GRANTS TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS FOR 

2 CONSTRUCTION, REFURBISHING, AND SERV3 ICING OF INDIVIDUALLY OWNED HOUSE4 HOLD WATER WELL SYSTEMS AND HOUSE5 HOLD DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER SYS6 TEMS IN RURAL AREAS FOR INDIVIDUALS 

7 WITH LOW OR MODERATE INCOME.’’; 

8 (2) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘100 percent’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘60 percent’’; 

10 (3) in subsection (b)— 

11 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

12 (i) by striking ‘‘loans’’ and inserting 

13 ‘‘subgrants’’; and 

14 (ii) by inserting ‘‘or household decen15 tralized wastewater systems’’ after ‘‘water 

16 well systems’’; and 

17 (B) by striking paragraph (2) and insert18 ing the following: 

19 ‘‘(2) SUBGRANTS.— 

20 ‘‘(A) AMOUNTS.—The amount of a 

21 subgrant provided to an eligible individual using 

22 grant funds under this section shall not exceed 

23 $20,000 for each water well system or decen24 tralized wastewater system described in para25 graph (1). 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2772 IS

1 ‘‘(B) USE IN CASES OF WELL WATER CON2 TAMINATION.—In the event of well water con3 tamination, the Secretary shall allow the use of 

4 a subgrant provided using grant funds under 

5 this section for the installation of water treat6 ment measures as needed beyond the point of 

7 entry, with or without the installation of new 

8 well equipment.’’; 

9 (4) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘productive 

10 use of individually-owned household water well sys11 tems’’ and inserting ‘‘effective use of individually 

12 owned household water well systems or household 

13 decentralized wastewater systems’’; and 

14 (5) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘$5,000,000 

15 for each of fiscal years 2014 through 2018’’ and in16 serting ‘‘$100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 

17 through 2023’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                               AGREEMENT
                             BY AND BETWEEN
                            JDS FITEL, INC.
                                  AND
                    OPTICAL COATING LABORATORY, INC.

     WHEREAS, Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc. ("OCLI") and JDS FITEL, INC.
("JDS") entered into that certain Agreement by and between JDS FITEL Inc.
and Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc. ("OCLI"), dated February 1, 1997 (the
"Agreement"), to combine their respective areas of expertise and
capabilities in a joint effort for WDM Product Business, as that term is
defined therein;

     WHEREAS, Section 15.16 of the Agreement provides that the OCLI and JDS
may amend the Agreement if such amendment is set forth in writing and
signed by duly authorized officers of each; and

     WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement effective June 1,
1997 (the "Effective Date");

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement
effective as of the Effective Date as follows:

1.   In Section 1.1, Definitions, replace the definitions of "WDM Optical
Filters"; and "WDM Products" with the following definitions:

     "WDM Optical Filters" shall mean WDM Optical Filters A, WDM Optical
Filters B and WDM Optical Filters C;


     "WDM Products" shall mean:

     [CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED]

2.   In Section 1.1, Definitions, add the following definitions:

     "WDM Optical Filters C" shall mean any and all optical filters that
are intended to be used in WDM Products C;

     [CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED]

3.   In Section 15.1, Non-Supply of WDM Optical Filters to Third Parties,
replace the words "June 1, 1997" with the words "1 August 1997".

4.   In Section 9.1 (a)(i), Termination by JDS, replace the words "May 31,
1997" with the words "August 31,1997".  At its September 5, 1997 meeting,
the Joint Venture Management Committee determined that this obligation of
OCLI was satisfied effective August 31, 1997.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OCLI and JDS adopt this Amendment as of the
Effective Date.


                         OPTICAL COATING LABORATORY, INC.



                         By    /S/CHARLES J. ABBE
                         ITS   PRESIDENT
                               Title                 


                         JDS FITEL INC.



                         By /S/M. ZITA COBB
                            Chief Financial Officier & V.P.
                            Finance
#### CAMPBELL v. STATE.

No. 20239.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 1, 1939.

Geo. E. Hosey, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary; punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of 10 years.

*565The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and all procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### PIERCE v. STATE.

No. 20247.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 1, 1939.

*585Homer Lee Parsons, of Athens, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of sixty days and a fine of $50.

Appellant’s principal contention is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction.

The state’s testimony, briefly stated, shows that on the evening of the 4th day of October, 1937, Mrs. Bonner Frizzell and her sister were returning to her home from Fort Worth. That when they reached a point near the town of Athens in Henderson County, they had a collision with a car driven by appellant. The car in which Mrs. Frizzell and her sister were driving was on the right side of the road, while appellant, who was coming from the opposite direction, had driven over on that side of the road as a consequence of which the collision occurred.

The sheriff, who was- immediately notified of the occurrence, arrested appellant and took him to jail. He testified that appellant was drunk, walked in an unsteady manner, talked incoherently and that his breath carried the odor of whisky. Dr. Henderson, who was at the jail when appellant was brought in, also testified that appellant was drunk. Appellant testified in his own behalf that he was not intoxicated. Other witnesses testified to the same effect. This raised an issue as to whether appellant was intoxicated at the time, and this issue the jury decided adversely to appellant’s contention. Under the circumstances above stated, this court would not be authorized to disturb their verdict.

Appellant applied for a continuance based on the absence of Mrs. Emma Harrison, by whom he expected to prove that she was with him in the car at the time of the collision and that he was not under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The court overruled the application but no exception was taken to the court’s ruling. Hence the matter is not properly before us for review.

Appellant next contends that the verdict is too indefinite and is insufficient. We quote from it as follows:

> “We the jury find the defendant guilty of driving a motor vehicle on a public highway while under the influence of intoxication. And assess punishment of confinement in County Jail of 60 days and fine of fifty Dollars.

> “C. H. Holmes, Foreman”

There is no doubt in our mind as to the sufficiency of this verdict. It could hardly be expressed in more certain terms.

All other matters complained of are without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

' The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit 5.1


(Includes Exhibit 23.1)











August 15, 2022





Securities and Exchange Commission


Division of Corporation Finance


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





Re: Proposed Offering of up to 16,000,000 shares of Common Stock Pursuant to the Electronic Arts Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan





Ladies/Gentlemen:





I refer to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the “ Registration Statement ”) to be filed by Electronic Arts Inc. (“ EA ”) on or about August 15, 2022 in connection with the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “ Securities Act ”), of 16,000,000 shares of EA Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “ Shares ”), available for issuance under the Electronic Arts Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “ 2019 EIP ”).





I am the Chief Legal Officer of EA. I have examined the proceedings taken by EA in connection with the 2019 EIP and the Shares being registered hereby.





Based upon the foregoing, it is my opinion that the 16,000,000 Shares have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action of EA and, when issued and sold in accordance with the terms set forth in the 2019 EIP, and when the Registration Statement has become effective under the Securities Act, the Shares will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.





The foregoing opinion is limited to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.





I consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and further consent to all references to this opinion, if any, in the Registration Statement and amendments thereto.  In giving such consent, I do not thereby admit that I am an “expert” within the meaning of the Securities Act or the rules and regulations of the Commission issued thereunder with respect to any part of the Registration Statement, including this exhibit.





Very truly yours,





/s/ Jacob J. Schatz


Jacob J. SchatzChief Legal OfficerElectronic Arts Inc.











209 Redwood Shores Parkway, Redwood City, CA 94065[TEL] 650 628 1500www.ea.com