alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Test Procedures for Distribution Transformers SNOPR Public Meeting 

## Sampling Plans for Compliance and Enforcement Testing

Building Techn ol og i e s P ro g ra m Office of Energy Efficiency and R enewa b le En ergy

D epart m ent E nergy September 2 7, 2004

## ,.)arnpling Plan for Compliance Testing

Purpo s e: esta b lis h o n a on e-ti me bas is, the effi c i ency 

### ba sic mod el

2

### Selection of Un i ts Test i ng w i thin

Fo r e ach b asi c mod el, se l ect a sample of 5 or mo re un i ts ® Production units or units representative of production units • If fewer than 5 units are available over a reasonable period, test all units - Must use sample size of 5 units or more to substantiate an AEDM

3

## DOE Proposed Sampling Plan - Operating 2 ® Ca l cul ate th e ave rage efficiency it with the requ ire m e nt of the following operating equation:

100 100 1 +^ 1 +^5JLRE h1 Where: X = measured average efficiency of test sample n = number of units tested RE = rated efficiency Expressed in terms of power loss: 

### X -< RL 1 + ^-

n Where:

X = measured average power loss of sample n = number of units tested ILL = represented power loss 4

## DOE Proposed Sampling Plan - Operatin (continued) ® The m a gn it ud e an d functionality of the "expanded unce rtai nty " ter m, (0.05N n), affect results ® Methodology similar the stat i sti ca l z -e S tatistical ba sis and o peratin g characteristics are discussed in NI ST Technical Note 1456

5

### Other Issues

. 

### ? opportun i ty fo r discuss ot to the propo s ed samp li ng p l an distribution

6

### Enforcement Testing

Enforcement testing consistent with for consumer electric CFR P a rt 431 ) Key points the Enforcement Testing procedure discuss: • Test Notice • Test Unit Selection and Preparation • Sampling Plan for Enforcement Testing ® Te stin g M anufact u rer's Opt i on

7

## aampling Plan for Enforcement Testing L Test method: DOE te st proced ure Up to 20 un its may b e s electe d test i ng F i ve un its are tes te d initiall y I- Th e S a mp lin g P l a n ® 9 7.5% confidence li m it ® F ive p ercent tolera n ce o n l o sse s A ll owan ces for li m ited testin g 

### 80 w

## ^j # 

## Chart 

## (Append i 

## x I 3 

## of Part 432)

INTIAL TESTS n, number of tests ml number of units

CALCULATE X, sample mean S1 standard deviation SE(XI) standard error SSD(m ,) sample size discount LCLI lower control limit CALCULATE X2 sample mean SE(X2) standard error LCL2 lower control limit

MANUFACTURER'S OPTIONAL TESTING 9

## 0 0"'ther Issues ?. opportun ity fo r s takeho l ders d i scuss othe r i ssues t o e nfo rce m e nt testin g a d ist ri but i on transforme r.

10
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11

                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Six Months Ended June 30,
                                           ---------------------------------------------
                                                            2000                   1999
                                           ---------------------------------------------
<S>                                                      <C>                    <C>
Net Income                                                   959                    373
  Less dividends on preferred stock                          (12)                   (12)
                                           ---------------------------------------------

Net Income available to common
  stockholders                                               947                    361

Average shares outstanding - both basic
  and diluted                                            668,360                668,360

Earnings per share - Basic and diluted                     $1.42                  $0.54
</TABLE>
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2732 

To clarify that participants in the National Health Service Corps Loan 

Repayment Program may be assigned to serve in pediatric inpatient 

mental health facilities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 24, 2018 

Mr. TESTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To clarify that participants in the National Health Service 

Corps Loan Repayment Program may be assigned to 

serve in pediatric inpatient mental health facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defending Access to 

5 Mental Health Care Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2732 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROVISION OF PRIMARY CARE HEALTH PROFES2 SIONALS AT PEDIATRIC INPATIENT MENTAL 

3 HEALTH FACILITIES. 

4 (a) HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SHORTAGE AREA MED5 ICAL FACILITIES.—Section 332(a)(2)(A) of the Public 

6 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254e(a)(2)(A)) is amended 

7 by inserting ‘‘pediatric inpatient mental health facility 

8 that is certified by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 

9 Services,’’ after ‘‘community mental health center,’’. 

10 (b) ASSIGNMENT OF CORPS MEMBERS.—Section 

11 338B(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

12 254l–1(a)) is amended— 

13 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and 

14 inserting ‘‘;’’; 

15 (2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para16 graph (3); and 

17 (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol18 lowing: 

19 ‘‘(2) an adequate supply of mental health pro20 fessionals at pediatric inpatient mental health facili21 ties that are certified by the Centers for Medicare & 

22 Medicaid Services; and’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: R MALDONADO <rpm_crcs@yahoo.com>

Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 8:25 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: RE: NHPA Consultation - Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department

Thanks 

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

On Oct 2, 2015, 9:23:45 AM, Kelly, Shaheerah wrote: 

Ron, 

Thank you for letting me know. I will remove your name from the mailing list.

************************************ 

Shaheerah Kelly

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-947-4156 

Fax: 415-947-3579 

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

From: R MALDONADO [mailto:rpm_crcs@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 4:41 PM 

To: Kelly, Shaheerah; oramm@navajo-nsn.gov 

Cc: timothy_begay@yahoo.com; dmallory@ResoluteEnergy.com; pflynn@ResoluteEnergy.com; 

dinetahdoo@yahoo.com; Kelly, Shaheerah 

Subject: RE: NHPA Consultation - Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department

Please remove me from the email list. I am no longer associated with the Navajo nation

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

On Sep 30, 2015, 4:04:55 PM, Kelly, Shaheerah wrote: 

Good afternoon, 

Please review the attached documents. Feel free to contact me for questions. 

************************************ 

Shaheerah Kelly
2

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-947-4156 

Fax: 415-947-3579 

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
# C_2022431EN.01000201.xml

| 14.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10887 – INEOS / SINOPEC / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 431/02)

On 25 October 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10887. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10887. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16** 

**- 1526** 

WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., on behalf of and as next friend of J.F.D., a minor
,

Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

and

J.F.D., a minor,

Plaintiff,

v.

MELANIE A. SHEKITA, Individually and as a Wake County NC Assistant District Attorney for the State of North Carolina; MICHELLE SAVAGE, individually and as a Police Detective for the Cary North Carolina Police Department; DANIELLE DOYLE, individually and as a Wake County North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Child Protective Services Social Worker; ERIC CRAIG CHASSE, individually and as a Wake County North Carolina Family Court Judge; MIKE EASLEY, individually and as Governor of the State of North Carolina;
BEV ERLY PERDUE, individually and as Governor of the State of North Carolina
,

Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Malcolm J. Howard
, Senior District Judge. ( 5:12

- cv

- 00504

- H )

Submitted : July 28, 2016 Decided: August 1, 20162 Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

William Scott Davis, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order denying eight motions in a closed civil rights action. W e

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Davis v. Shekita , No. 5:12−cv−00504−H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 5,

2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                  95,500
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                          167,600
<ALLOWANCES>                            11,600
<INVENTORY>                            165,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       467,500
<PP&E>                                 565,100
<DEPRECIATION>                         346,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         873,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  253,300
<BONDS>                                177,600
<COMMON>                                 3,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                             234,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           873,700
<SALES>                              1,121,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     1,121,500
<CGS>                                  892,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          892,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       227,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      12,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (10,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                            (3,100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (7,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                            (7,300)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (.36)
        

</TABLE>
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2770 

To direct the Attorney General to submit to Congress investigative materials 

in the event of certain pardons granted by the President, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2018 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO (for herself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Mr. VAN HOLLEN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To direct the Attorney General to submit to Congress investigative materials in the event of certain pardons granted 

by the President, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Abuse of the Pardon 

5 Prevention Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT RELATING TO CER7 TAIN PARDONS. 

8 (a) SUBMISSION OF INFORMATION.—In the event 

9 that the President grants an individual a pardon for an 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2770 IS

1 offense against the United States that arises from an in2 vestigation in which the President, or a relative of the 

3 President, is a target, subject, or witness, not later than 

4 30 days after the date of such pardon, the Attorney Gen5 eral shall submit to the chairmen and ranking members 

6 of the appropriate congressional committees all materials 

7 of an investigation that were obtained by a United States 

8 Attorney, another Federal prosecutor, or an investigative 

9 authority of the Federal Government, relating to the of10 fense for which the individual is so pardoned. 

11 (b) TREATMENT OF INFORMATION.—Rule 6(e) of the 

12 Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure may not be con13 strued to prohibit the disclosure of information required 

14 by subsection (a) of this section. 

15 (c) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall apply with 

16 respect to a pardon granted by the President on or after 

17 January 20, 2017. 

18 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

19 (1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMIT20 TEES.—The term ‘‘appropriate congressional com21 mittees’’ means— 

22 (A) the Committee on the Judiciary of the 

23 House of Representatives and the Committee 

24 on the Judiciary of the Senate; and 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2770 IS

1 (B) if an investigation relates to intel2 ligence or counterintelligence matters, the Per3 manent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

4 House of Representatives and the Select Com5 mittee on Intelligence of the Senate. 

6 (2) PARDON.—The term ‘‘pardon’’ includes a 

7 commutation of sentence. 

8 (3) RELATIVE.—The term ‘‘relative’’ has the 

9 meaning given that term in section 3110(a) of title 

10 5, United States Code. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2022286EN.01001601.xml

| 27.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/16

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10809 – CD&R / TPG / COVETRUS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 286/02)

On 20 July 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10809. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10809. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### ROGERS v. STATE.

No. 20041.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 21, 1938.

Gray & Pope, of Tyler, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of driving an automobile while intoxicated, and sentenced to serve a. term of one year in the penitentiary.

*635The indictment appears regular. The evidence heard upon the trial is not brought forward for review. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense charged in the indictment, and presented no complaint of the procedure followed upon the trial.

No error having been perceived or pointed out, the judgment is affirmed.
# C_2022281EN.01000101.xml

| 22.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10780 – WATERLAND / KIDSFOUNDATION / PARTOU)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 281/01)

On 29 June 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10780. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10780. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
    period ended December 31, 2004 (the Report)
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
    78m or 78o(d)); and
|
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.                                                                                   





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Jimmy S.H. Lee     
| |                        
| | Jimmy S.H. Lee         
| | Chief Executive Officer






127
# C_2022126EN.01000601.xml

| 21.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10456 – SKY / VIACOMCBS / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 126/03)

On 1 December 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10456. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10456. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**P&F INDUSTRIES,INC.**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Wehave issued our report dated March 29, 2007 (which expresses anunqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoptionof Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) as of January 1,2006) accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule includedin the Annual Report of P&F Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements ofP&F Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries, on Forms S-8 effective February 18,1997 and June 14, 2002.
| /s/  GRANT THORNTON LLP |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Melville, New York      |   |
| March 29, 2007     |   |

 

----