alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2699 

To modernize the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2015 

Mr. ISRAEL (for himself, Mr. KING of New York, Ms. ESTY, Mr. HIMES, Mr. 

LANGEVIN, Mr. HONDA, and Mr. CONYERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To modernize the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Undetectable Firearms 

5 Modernization Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODERNIZATION OF THE PROHIBITION ON 

7 UNDETECTABLE FIREARMS. 

8 Section 922(p) of title 18, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (1)— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2699 IH

1 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking 

2 ‘‘grips, stocks, and magazines’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘all parts other than major components’’; and 

4 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

5 ‘‘when subjected to inspection by the types of x6 ray machines commonly used at airports, does 

7 not generate’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘if 

8 subjected to inspection by the types of detection 

9 devices commonly used at airports for security 

10 screening, would not generate’’; 

11 (2) in paragraph (2)— 

12 (A) by striking subparagraph (B) and in13 serting the following: 

14 ‘‘(B) the term ‘major component’, with respect 

15 to a firearm— 

16 ‘‘(i) means the slide or cylinder, or the 

17 frame or receiver of the firearm; and 

18 ‘‘(ii) in the case of a rifle or shotgun, in19 cludes the barrel of the firearm; and’’; and 

20 (B) by striking subparagraph (C) and the 

21 proviso that follows and inserting the following: 

22 ‘‘(C) the term ‘Security Exemplar’ means an 

23 object, to be fabricated at the direction of the Attor24 ney General, that is— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2699 IH

1 ‘‘(i) constructed of 3.7 ounces of material 

2 type 17–4 PH stainless steel in a shape resem3 bling a handgun; and 

4 ‘‘(ii) suitable for testing and calibrating 

5 metal detectors.’’; 

6 (3) in paragraph (3)— 

7 (A) in the first sentence, by inserting 

8 after ‘‘of a firearm’’ the following: ‘‘, in9 cluding a prototype,’’; and 

10 (B) by striking the second sentence; 

11 and 

12 (4) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘shall not 

13 apply to any firearm which’’ and all that follows and 

14 inserting the following: ‘‘shall not apply to— 

15 ‘‘(A) any firearm received by, in the possession 

16 of, or under the control of the United States; or 

17 ‘‘(B) the manufacture, importation, possession, 

18 transfer, receipt, shipment, or delivery of a firearm 

19 by a licensed manufacturer or licensed importer pur20 suant to an existing contract with the United 

21 States.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This restated financial data schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the consolidated financial statements included in P & F
Industries, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31,
1996 and December 31, 1995 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                                   <C>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         YEAR                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1996            DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1996            DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                    4,558,135              1,224,603
<SECURITIES>                                      0                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                             6,113,259              9,163,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0                      0
<INVENTORY>                              11,119,850             14,903,561
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         22,343,094             26,147,398
<PP&E>                                   10,745,608             10,893,043
<DEPRECIATION>                            4,965,956              4,760,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           31,331,643             35,415,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     6,661,311             10,309,671
<BONDS>                                   5,288,570              7,414,181
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0                      0
<PREFERRED>                               2,633,450              2,633,450
<COMMON>                                  2,928,867              2,928,867
<OTHER-SE>                               13,819,445             12,129,503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             31,331,643             35,415,672
<SALES>                                  42,650,342             42,645,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         43,078,371             43,047,601
<CGS>                                    28,698,300             29,015,050
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            28,698,300             29,015,050
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          754,069              1,021,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           3,187,287              2,345,975
<INCOME-TAX>                              1,234,000                854,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       1,953,287              1,491,975
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0                      0
<CHANGES>                                         0                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              1,953,287              1,491,975
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .58                    .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .52                    .39
<FN>
<F1> ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARE NET OF ALLOWANCE
</FN>



</TABLE>
701 A.2d 847

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Joseph T. LILLY, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG, No. 59,

Sept.Term, 1997.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Oct. 30, 1997.

*ORDER*

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Suspension of Respondent by Consent for Thirty Days submitted by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and Joseph T. Lilly, Respondent. The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 30th day of October, 1997,

ORDERED by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Joseph T. Lilly, shall be suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for a period of thirty (30) days, to begin on November 24, 1997, for committing misconduct in violation of Maryland Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4(d) and his reinstatement shall be conditioned upon his reinstatement to the District of Columbia bar; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Joseph T. Lilly, effective November 24, 1997, from the register of attorneys in this Court ánd shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Rule 16-713.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2749 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2749

          To amend the Reclamation Safety of Dams Act of 1978.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2015

    Mr. Valadao (for himself, Mr. Denham, Mr. Costa, Mr. Nunes, Mr. 
 Calvert, Mr. Royce, Mr. Cramer, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Knight, Mrs. Mimi 
    Walters of California, Mrs. Lummis, Mr. Issa, Mr. McCarthy, Mr. 
 Rohrabacher, Mr. Cook, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, and Mr. Walden) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To amend the Reclamation Safety of Dams Act of 1978.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dams Accountability, Maintenance, 
and Safety Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL PROJECT BENEFITS.

    The Reclamation Safety of Dams Act of 1978 (43 U.S.C. 506 et seq.) 
is amended--
            (1) in section 3, by striking ``Construction'' and 
        inserting ``Except as provided in section 5B, construction''; 
        and
            (2) by inserting after section 5A (43 U.S.C. 509) the 
        following:

``SEC. 5B. ADDITIONAL PROJECT BENEFITS.

    ``Notwithstanding section 3, if the Secretary determines that 
additional project benefits, including additional conservation storage 
capacity, are feasible and not inconsistent with the purposes of this 
Act, the Secretary is authorized to develop additional project benefits 
through the construction of new or supplementary works on a project in 
conjunction with the Secretary's activities under section 2 and subject 
to the conditions described in the feasibility study, provided that--
            ``(1) the Secretary determines that developing additional 
        project benefits through the construction of new or 
        supplementary works on a project will promote more efficient 
        management of water and water-related facilities;
            ``(2) the feasibility study pertaining to additional 
        project benefits has been authorized pursuant to section 8 of 
        the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 
        4601-18); and
            ``(3) the costs associated with developing the additional 
        project benefits are allocated to the authorized purposes of 
        the structure and repaid consistent with all provisions of 
        Federal Reclamation law (the Act of June 17, 1902, 43 U.S.C. 
        371 et seq.) and Acts supplemental to and amendatory of that 
        Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.File No. 33-57345, 333-59132, 333-70444, 333-41369, 333-84069 and 333-99187 and 333-124697) andForm S-3 (File No. 333-131066) of Parker Drilling Company of our report dated February 28, 2007relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.Houston, Texas
-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

ROBERT A. RUFFINS, by Conservator, JOHN R. 

RUFFINS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

UNPUBLISHED

January 18, 2018

v No. 335305

Livingston Circuit Court

DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY, LC No. 13-027760-NO

Defendant-Appellee.

Before: MURPHY, P.J., and SAWYER and BECKERING, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In a previous opinion in this case, this Court directed as follows:

Because DTE entitled to summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) 

with respect to the element of causation, and because causation, as opposed to 

rule violations, would not have been a matter for the MPSC to explore, we reverse 

the trial court’s primary jurisdiction ruling and remand for entry of judgment in 

favor of DTE. [Ruffins v DTE Electric Co, unpublished opinion per curiam of the 

Court of Appeals, p 4, issued April 28, 2016 (Docket No. 325443).]

Plaintiff did not appeal the ruling to our Supreme Court, and on remand to the trial court,

plaintiff filed a supplemental submission of evidence, arguing that the evidence established an 

issue of fact on causation. Wisely, the trial court rejected the submission and argument and 

entered judgment in favor of DTE as ordered by this Court. Plaintiff now appeals. Under the 

rule of mandate, “a lower court must strictly comply with, and may not exceed the scope of, a 

remand order.” Int’l Business Machines Corp v Dep’t of Treasury, 316 Mich App 346, 352; 891 

NW2d 880 (2016). The trial court properly entered judgment in favor of DTE. Assuming that 

plaintiff can even validly file an appeal to this Court under the circumstances, the trial court’s 

ruling is affirmed.

Affirmed. Taxable costs are awarded to DTE under MCR 7.219.

/s/ William B. Murphy

/s/ David H. Sawyer

/s/ Jane M. Beckering
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF L.A.M.,

A CHILD. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 16

- 00157

- CV

Appeal from

109th District Court

of Winkler County, Texas

(TC # 16,723 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered the cause on the record and concludes that there was no error in

the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below.

It has been determined that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal; therefore, this

Court ma kes no other order with respect to the payment of costs on appeal. This decision shall

be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7 TH DAY OF DEC EMBE R , 2016

.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION



### November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 2

- 0 0 986

- C V

Style: Albert Prevot

v BankcorpSouth Bank f/k/a Bank of Mississippi

Date motion filed * : June 6 , 201 3

Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file appellee’s brief

Party filing motion: Appell ee

Document to be filed: Appell ee ’ s brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: March 13, 2013

Number of previous extensions granted: 2 Current Due date: June 21, 2013

Date Requested: August 20, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: August 20, 2013

 T he Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Under normal circumstances, we do not grant extensions of time past 90 days. In light of the

circumstances in this case, however, we grant appellee’s motion. Nevertheless, no further extensions

of time will be granted, and the case will be set at issue without appellee’s brief if appellee fails to file

said brief by August 20, 2013.

Judge's signature: /s/ J i m Sharp



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: June 20, 2013
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Review of ARC F99/K00 and MOSAIC K99/R00 Applications.                    

*Date:*                         November 18-19, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Tracy Koretsky, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, MSC 6200, Room 3AN12F, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, 301-594-2886,                         *tracy.koretsky@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 15, 2024.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-21417 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit (11)
                           
             OWENS CORNING AND SUBSIDIARIES
                           
           COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                           
 FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
                           
<TABLE>
<S>                                <C>            <C>          <C>
Primary:
                                        1996         1995         1994
                                 (In millions of dollars, except share data)

Net income (loss)                   $   (284)     $   231      $   159

Weighted average number of 
  shares outstanding 
  (thousands)                         51,722       49,152       43,647

Weighted average common 
  equivalent shares 
  (thousands):
  Deferred awards                          -           16           21

  Stock options using
    weighted average
    market price                           -          543          541

Primary weighted average 
  number of common shares
  outstanding and common 
  equivalent shares (thousands)       51,722       49,711       44,209

Primary per share amount             $ (5.50)     $  4.64      $  3.61

Fully Diluted:

Net income (loss)                    $  (284)     $   238      $   168

Weighted average number of
  shares outstanding (thousands)      51,722       49,152       43,647
Weighted average common 
  equivalent shares (thousands):
  Deferred awards                          -           16           21
  Stock options using the higher 
    of average market price or 
    market price at end of period          -          566          559
  Shares from assumed conversion
    of debt                                -        1,562        5,798
  Shares from assumed conversion
    of preferred securities                -        2,810            -

Fully diluted weighted average 
  number of common shares 
  outstanding and common 
  equivalent shares (thousands)       51,722       54,106       50,025

Fully diluted per share amount       $ (5.50)     $  4.40      $  3.35
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, V. Bryan Lawlis, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aradigm Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       /s/ V. Bryan Lawlis     V. Bryan Lawlis    *President and Chief Executive Officer*