alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ray C. Davis, Co-Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: July 11, 2005



/s/ Ray C. DavisRay C. DavisCo-Chief Executive Officer




---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kelcy L. Warren, Co-Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: July 11, 2005



/s/ Kelcy L. WarrenKelcy L. WarrenCo-Chief Executive Officer


---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|EXHIBIT 12.2                                      |                        
|------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------
|SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY                   |                        
|COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES |                        
|(Dollars in millions)                             |                        
|                                                  |                        
|                                                  |                        
|                                                  | 2000                   
|                                                  |                        
|Fixed Charges:                                    |                        
|                                                  |                        
|Interest                                          | $                    72
|                                                  |                        
|Interest portion of annual rentals                | 4                      
|                                                  |                        
|                                                  |                        
|Total fixed charges for purpose of ratio          | $                    76
|                                                  |                        
|                                                  |                        
|                                                  |                        
|                                                  |                        
|                                                  |                        
|Earnings:                                         |                        
|                                                  |                        
|Pretax income from continuing operations          | $                  390 
|                                                  |                        
|Add: total fixed charges (from above)             | 76                     
|                                                  |                        
|                                                  |                        
|Total earnings for purpose of ratio               | $                  466 
|                                                  |                        
|                                                  |                        
|                                                  |                        
|                                                  |                        
|                                                  |                        
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                | 6.13                   
|                                                  |                        
|                                                  |                        
|                                                  |                        
|                                                  |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 311 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-643, CP2024-652.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21339 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Thomas C. Chesterman, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of AradigmCorporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.         /s/ Thomas C. Chesterman      Thomas C. Chesterman   *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*   
Dated: December 22, 2004
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2666 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from 

regulating the rates charged for broadband Internet access service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2666 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Rate Regulation 

3 of Broadband Internet Access Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REGULATION OF BROADBAND RATES PROHIBITED. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Fed6 eral Communications Commission may not regulate the 

7 rates charged for broadband Internet access service. 

8 SEC. 3. EXCEPTIONS. 

9 Nothing in this Act shall be construed to affect the 

10 authority of the Commission to— 

11 (1) condition receipt of universal service sup12 port under section 254 of the Communications Act 

13 of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254) by a provider of broadband 

14 Internet access service on the regulation of the rates 

15 charged by such provider for the supported service; 

16 (2) enforce subpart Y of part 64 of title 47, 

17 Code of Federal Regulations (relating to truth-in18 billing requirements); or 

19 (3) enforce section 8.9 of title 47, Code of Fed20 eral Regulations (relating to paid prioritization). 

21 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

22 For purposes of this Act, broadband Internet access 

23 service shall not be construed to include data roaming or 

24 interconnection. 

25 SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS. 

26 In this Act: 
3 

•HR 2666 EH

1 (1) BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE.— 

2 The term ‘‘broadband Internet access service’’ has 

3 the meaning given such term in the rules adopted in 

4 the Report and Order on Remand, Declaratory Rul5 ing, and Order that was adopted by the Commission 

6 on February 26, 2015 (FCC 15–24). 

7 (2) COMMISSION.—The term ‘‘Commission’’ 

8 means the Federal Communications Commission. 

9 (3) RATE.—The term ‘‘rate’’ means the amount 

10 charged by a provider of broadband Internet access 

11 service for the delivery of broadband Internet traffic. 

12 (4) REGULATION.—The term ‘‘regulation’’ or 

13 ‘‘regulate’’ means, with respect to a rate, the use by 

14 the Commission of rulemaking or enforcement au15 thority to establish, declare, or review the reason16 ableness of such rate. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 15, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2666 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the Federal Communications Commisbroadband Internet access service. sion from regulating the rates charged for
#### HODGE v. STATE.

No. 20319.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 29, 1939.

John S. Simmang, of Giddings, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*670HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for accepting a bribe, his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary. The specific charge against appellant was that he was a member of the board of trustees of a designated school district in Lee County, Texas, and as spch trustee accepted a bribe under his promise to vote for a certain named party as a teacher in said school. Appellant entered a plea of guilty and punishment was assessed as heretofore indicated.

The record contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears to be sufficient to charge the offense. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### HAENEL v. STATE.

No. 19724.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 11, 1938.

Jim Letts, of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery by assault, and awarded a term of five years in the penitentiary.

There is but one bill of exceptions in the record, and it is not properly certified to by the court, and only appears in a question and answer form, which the court does not certify to have been necessary. Such attempted bill is also multifarious, in that other and further matters are attempted to be embraced therein, which are not germane to nor connected with the first portion thereof. We cannot consider Jsuch bill.

The facts testified to indicate that the complaining witness, R. P. Mounce, was the keeper of a filling station in Houston. About 11:40 on the night in question two men came riding up to his filling station and stopped their car within six to eight feet of where he was sitting inside thereof, and one Eddie Clark walked into the station where witness was sitting at the desk, posting up, produced a pistol, pointed it at the witness, and said, “Give it to me.” Witness opened the cash register and told Clark to help himself. Clark refused to do so but made Mounce give him the money in such register, Clark continuing to move his pistol from one hand to another, and pointing it at the witness. Mounce was in a glass-enclosed room and could see out on all sides, and the driver of the car in which Clark came up in was from six to eight feet of the witness. After Clark *737had obtained the contents of the cash register, he walked out of the station and got in the car and it was immediately driven away. Mr. Mounce positively identified the driver of such car as appellant, Carl Haenel.

The court gave a charge on principals that had frequently been approved by this court.

The defense was an alibi. The jury heard the evidence, and evidently did not give credence to such testimony. They were the judges of the credibility of such witnesses.

We think the court properly charged the law as called for by the facts, and we are impressed with the conclusion that the appellant has received a fair trial at the hands of an impartial jury, and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT

Osmonics, Inc.

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Osmonics, Inc. (the
Company) as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1998 and have issued our report thereon dated
March 3, 1999.  Such financial statements and reports are included in the
Company's 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders and are incorporated herein by
reference.  Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of the
Company, listed in Item 14.  This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibilty is to express
an opinion based on our audits.  In our opinion, such financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken
as a whole, presents fairly, in all material aspects, the information set forth
therein.


DELOITTE AND TOUCHE LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 30, 1999
May 9, 2014 

Secretary Anthony Foxx 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Docket DOT -OST -2008-0299 

Dear Secretary F oxx, 

\_' 

1j 

I write to express my concerns with the Department of Transportation's Tentative Order to 

terminate the Essential Air Service (EAS) program in El Centro, California located in Imperial 

County. I urge you to consider the negative economic impacts that may occur as a result of the 

proposed termination of the program. 

The Imperial County Airport has a tremendous track record of surpassing the EAS program 

requirements put forth by the government, as they have dramatically exceeded the enplanement 

minimum in four of the last five fiscal years. Unfortunately, in FY 2013, the Imperial County 

Airport barely fell below the ten enplanement threshold, by reaching 9.5 enplanements for the 

first time. 

As you know, the Essential Air Service was put into place to guarantee that small communities, 

including those within the Imperial County, continue to be served by certificated air carriers. 

Over the last several years, Imperial County has experienced the highest unemployment rate in 

the nation. Our federal government should encourage economic growth, and consider all factors 

before terminating a much-needed program in the region. 

As you prepare the Final Order, I urge you to consider the Imperial Valley's track record over 

the last three fiscal years, and ask that you consider the void that will be left should the 

Department of Transportation ultimately decide to terminate the much-needed Essential Air 

Service program currently in effect at the Imperial County Airport. 

Thank you for your time and consideration of my request. 

Sincerely, 

Richard A Partridge, Jr. 

806 Kindig A venue 

Brawley, CA 92227-7768 

(760) 985-6961 (Cell)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         733,986
<SECURITIES>                                   994,735
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,811,543
<PP&E>                                         171,757
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (56,985)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,962,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          159,637
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           295
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,802,424
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,962,061
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               483,212
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (483,212)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (483,212)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (483,212)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
# Journal officiel C 265A/13 a

| | ISSN 1977-0936 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 265A |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 58e année13 août 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0936

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 265A

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

58e année13 août 2015

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avis |
| | PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES |
| | Conseil |
| 2015/C 265A/01 | Avis d'annulation | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

V   Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Conseil

2015/C 265A/01

Avis d'annulation

1

---

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

V Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Conseil

| 13.8.2015 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 265/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2015

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 265/1

---

AVIS D'ANNULATION

(2015/C 265 A/01)

La procédure de sélection CONS/AD/113:

| — | Directeur, service juridique, direction 3 (Relations extérieures) |
| --- | --- |

—

Directeur, service juridique, direction 3 (Relations extérieures)

pour laquelle un avis a été publié au Journal officiel de l'Union européenne
   (1) est annulée.

---

(1)  JO C 119 A du 14.4.2015, p. 18.

---