alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

P&F INDUSTRIES, INC.    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of P&F Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Horowitz, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|March 28, 2005Date |  | /s/RICHARD A. HOROWITZRichard A. Horowitz
Principal Executive Officer
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.a.ii

                            RESTORATION STOCK OPTION
                                 {CURRENT DATE}

NAME
ADDRESS
ADDRESS

Dear                 :

      You have exercised a non-qualified stock option previously granted to you,
and you paid all or part of the option exercise price by delivery of Company
stock. In accordance with the program adopted by the Organization and
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, subject to your acceptance you
are granted a non-qualified Restoration Option for shares of Company common
stock, $1 par value, subject to the terms of the 1991 Long Term Stock Incentive
Plan, as follows:

         Date of Restoration Option:

         Number of Shares Granted:

         The Option Price:  $

         Exercisable in Full on & after:

         This Option Expires after:

      Copies of the 1991 Plan, the Company's most recent proxy statement, Annual
Report to Stockholders and a Prospectus are enclosed for your information,
except to the extent our records indicate you have already received such
documents. Additional copies of any of these documents are available from the
Company upon your request.

      Except for reference to an option plan other than the 1991 Plan and the
above specific terms, all of the terms and conditions of your most recent option
agreement are incorporated in this Restoration Option, and both the Company and
you are bound thereby. Please sign two copies of this document and return them
as soon as possible to Eugene A. Gargaro, Jr. at the home office, since this
Restoration Option will not be effective until we receive the signed copies.

                                            MASCO CORPORATION

                                            By_________________________________
                                                Richard A. Manoogian
                                                Chairman of the Board and
                                                Chief Executive Officer

Accepted upon the terms above stated:

___________________________________
DATED:_____________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         2418000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 28661000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3970000
<INVENTORY>                                   95743000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             137379000
<PP&E>                                        65011000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               208579000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         41965000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        125000
<OTHER-SE>                                   149953000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 208579000
<SALES>                                      432266000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             432266000
<CGS>                                        294770000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                121995000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4687000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1772000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               20188000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9241000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           10947000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  10947000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .85
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1




EXHIBIT 11


                            SBI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                            FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
                             JUNE 30 , 1997 AND 1998

                                            Six Months       Six Months
                                              Ended            Ended
                                           June 30, 1997    June 30, 1998
                                           -------------   --------------
Shares outstanding:                           5,345,439        5,570,439
Weighted average shares outstanding           5,345,439        5,570,439
Net loss                                   $   (366,233)    $   (280,209)
Preferred Dividend                                --               --
                                           ------------     ------------  
Total                                          (366,233)        (280,209)
Net loss per share                         $      (0.07)   $       (0.05)









































                                     Page 11
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with Quarterly Report of Park Bancorp, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2009, (the Report), I, David
A. Remijas, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David A. RemijasDavid A. RemijasChairman and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 14, 2009
exv10w2



 





EXHIBIT 10.2




Schedule of employee directors and officers who signed Indemnity Agreements
substantially identical to Exhibit 10.18 to the Allied Waste Industries, Inc.
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed on May 6, 2004.




Name of Employee

Robert A. Alberico

Michael S. Burnett

James E. Gray

Steven M. Helm

Dale Parker

Greg Reddy

Donald W. Slager

James G. Van Weelden

Jo Lynn White

Douglas W. Borro

Charles H. Cotros

Peter S. Hathaway

Thomas P. Martin

John S. Quinn

Thomas W. Ryan

Donald A. Swierenga

Thomas H. Van Weelden
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 15

- 00325

- CV

JUPE FEEDS, INC.

, Appellant

v.

JOSE PINA

, Appellee

From the 249th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. C201300273

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jupe Feed’s Petition for Permissive Interlocutory Appeal filed on September 28,

2015 is denied. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See T EX

.

R. A PP

. P

. 28.3; 43.2(f).

TOM GRAY

Chief JusticeJupe Feeds, Inc. v. Pina Page 2

Before Chief Justice G ray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed October 15, 2015

[CV06]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT COMPANY CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED) FOR JUNE 30, 1999 AND
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,640
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (741)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,904
<PP&E>                                           2,694
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,083)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,158
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           122
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,515
<SALES>                                          8,276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,276
<CGS>                                            5,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,017)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,017)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,107)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.17)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Commercial Property Corporation
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending October 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Annual Report"), we, David C. Merrell, President and Kristine M. Rogers,
Secretary/Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.


Dated: 2/14/2006                          /s/David C. Merrell
      ----------                          -------------------------
                                          David C. Merrell
                                          President and Director


Dated: 2/14/2006                          /s/Kristine M. Rogers
      ----------                          -------------------------
                                          Kristine M. Rogers
                                          Secretary and Treasurer
# C_2022069EN.01000201.xml

| 10.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10372 – SHV Energy/UGI International Holding/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 69/02)

On 21 December 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10372. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10372. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### Bruce MAGERS, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Bonds Distributing Company, Inc., petitioner, v. Donald R. BONDS, et al.

No. 02-584.

Dec. 16, 2002.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 5070

_____________________________
D ARRELL B RIDGETT , J R

. , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Cour t for Suwannee County

. Paul S. Bryan , Judge

. December 11, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , W ETHERELL , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         130,387
<SECURITIES>                                14,651,759
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,876
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,876
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,760,783
<PP&E>                                         241,030
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,773
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,711,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,335,051
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,672
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,369,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,711,095
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               539,592
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (764,560)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (764,560)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (764,560)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

 No. 02-51093 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GREGORY ALLEN LININGHAM,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-93-CR-83-1 

--------------------

February 19, 2003

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gregory Allen Liningham, a federal prisoner (# 60684-080),

has filed a motion requesting leave to appeal in forma pauperis

(“IFP”) following the district court’s order striking his

pro se postconviction motion, his fourth such motion, from the

record as frivolous and improperly filed. This court may

authorize Liningham to proceed IFP on appeal only if he is

economically eligible and his appeal is not frivolous. Jackson

v. Dallas Police Dep’t, 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986). In

his latest postconviction action, a transparent effort to avoid

28 U.S.C. § 2255’s prohibitions against untimely and successive
No. 02-51093

-2-

motions to vacate, Liningham asserts that various federal

officials fraudulently prosecuted and convicted him in 1993 in

order to punish him for failing to pay tax penalties to the

Internal Revenue Service. Liningham’s arguments are completely

unsupported by any reference to specific facts, and his latest

postconviction motion is an “unauthorized” and “meaningless” one

over which the district court lacked jurisdiction. See United

States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994). The appeal is

without arguable merit, and we DENY IFP and DISMISS THE APPEAL AS

FRIVOLOUS. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 6482
TREVELL ANTWON HARVEY, a/k/a Travell Antwon Harvey, Petitioner

- Appellant,

v. CHADWICK DOTSON , Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Elizabeth W. Hanes , Magistrate Judge. ( 3:21

- cv - 00304

- EWH )

Submitted : September 29, 2023 Decided: November 15, 2023

Before GREGORY and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jonathan P. Sheldon , SHELDON & FLOOD, PLC , Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6482 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/15/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Trevell Antwon Harvey seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief

on his amended 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. * The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this stan dard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 580 U.S. 100, 115

- 17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529
U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harvey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argumen t would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). USCA4 Appeal: 22-6482 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/15/2023 Pg: 2 of 2