alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 128 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 267 

[Report No. 115–98] 

To provide for the correction of a survey of certain land in the State of 

Alaska. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2017 

Mr. SULLIVAN (for himself and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Natural Resources 

JUNE 8, 2017 

Reported by Ms. MURKOWSKI, without amendment 

A BILL 

To provide for the correction of a survey of certain land 

in the State of Alaska. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 267 RS

1 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF FEDERAL LAND WITHIN THE 

2 SWAN LAKE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT 

3 BOUNDARY. 

4 Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment 

5 of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior, after consulta6 tion with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall— 

7 (1) survey the exterior boundaries of the tract 

8 of Federal land within the project boundary of the 

9 Swan Lake Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2911) 

10 as generally depicted and labeled ‘‘Lost Creek’’ on 

11 the map entitled ‘‘Swan Lake Project Boundary— 

12 Lot 2’’ and dated February 1, 2016; and 

13 (2) issue a patent to the State of Alaska for the 

14 tract described in paragraph (1) in accordance 

15 with— 

16 (A) the survey authorized under paragraph 

17 (1); 

18 (B) section 6(a) of the Act of July 7, 1958 

19 (commonly known as the ‘‘Alaska Statehood 

20 Act’’) (48 U.S.C. note prec. 21; Public Law 85– 

21 508); and 

22 (C) section 24 of the Federal Power Act 

23 (16 U.S.C. 818). 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 128 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 267 

[Report No. 115–98] 

A BILL 

To provide for the correction of a survey of certain 

land in the State of Alaska. 

JUNE 8, 2017 

Reported without amendment 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-365-366 and 731-TA-734-735 (Fifth Review)]

## Determinations

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain pasta from Italy and Turkey would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on March 1, 2024 (89 FR 15217) and determined on June 4, 2024 that it would conduct expedited reviews (89 FR 59160, July 22, 2024).

                    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on September 13, 2024. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5544 (September 2024), entitled                     *Certain Pasta from Italy and Turkey: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-365-366 and 731-TA-734-735 (Fifth Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: September 13, 2024.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2024-21399 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     Exhibit 3.2
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                       APPLIED ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.

         Applied Analytical Industries, Inc., a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That the Board of Directors of said corporation, duly adopted a
resolution setting forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of
Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable, and
calling a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation for consideration
thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

          RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of Applied Analytical
          Industries, Inc. be amended to increase the maximum size of the Board
          of Directors from seven (7) to nine (9).

         SECOND: That thereafter, a meeting of the stockholders of said
corporation was duly called and held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware at which meeting the
holders of more than 75% of the outstanding shares of voting stock voted in
favor of the amendment.

         THIRD: That the aforesaid amendments were duly adopted in accordance
with the applicable provisions of Sections 242 and 222 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

<PAGE>   2

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Applied Analytical Industries, Inc. has caused
this certificate to be signed by Frederick D. Sancilio, Ph.D., its Chairman of
the Board of Directors, this 24th day of May, 2000.

                              APPLIED ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.


                              By:  _______________________________
                                   Frederick D. Sancilio, Ph.D.
                                   Chairman of the Board of Directors

                                       2
#### W. R. WISEMAN et al., Appellants, v. STATE BANK OF LAVERNIA, Appellee.

No. 9446.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Nov. 14, 1934.

Wiseman & Murray, of Floresville, for appellants.

J. 0. Wiseman, of Lavernia, and Hull & Oliver, of San Antonio, for appellee.

SMITH, Justice.

W. R. Wiseman executed and delivered his promissory note to the Lavernia State Bank, and Joe Wiseman guaranteed payment thereof. The bank failed and its assets were taken over and its affairs administered by the State Banking Commissioner as provided by law. Afterwards said note was transferred to the State Bank of Lavernia, which brought this action against the maker and guarantor to recover upon the note. From an adverse judgment the Wisemans have appealed.

This is a companion case to W. R. Wiseman v. State Bank of Lavernia (76 S.W.(2d) 205), this day decided by this court, in which the facts and questions of law are identical with those in this case.

For the reasons given in the cited case, the judgment of the trial court herein is affirmed.

BICKETT, C. J., did not participate in the decision of this case.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10323 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SAMUEL EMEKA NWOKOLO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CR-159-D

- - - - - - - - - - May 9, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Samuel Emeka Nwokolo appeals his conviction following a jury trial for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute heroin and possession with the intent to distribute heroin. Nwokolo cannot demonstrate clear error affecting his substantial rights from the Government’s questions eliciting answers Nwokolo alleges improperly injected ethnicity into the trial in an attempt to inflame the jury, as he cannot show thatNo. 96-10323 - 2 - any injection of ethnicity was so pronounced and persistent that it permeated the entire atmosphere of his trial. See United States v. Castillo , 77 F.3d 1480, 1497 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 180, and cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 236, and cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 502 (1996); United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc). The district court did not err by admitting evidence that was not alleged in the indictment. Nwokolo did not suffer prejudice to his substantial rights as the evidence supported the showing at trial of the existence of only a single conspiracy as alleged in the indictment. See United States v. Jensen , 41 F.3d 946, 956 (5th Cir. 1994). The record regarding the merits of Nwokolo’s ineffective assistance-of-counsel claim is not fully developed. Accordingly, this court declines to address it. See United States v. Higdon , 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir. 1987). Nwokolo has failed to argue his issue that the district court erred by denying his motion to sever. He has also failed to independently argue his issues that he was denied his right to confront the witnesses against him and that there was insufficient evidence to support the verdict. He raised these last issues in an attempt to demonstrate prejudice due to ineffective assistance of counsel. Nwokolo has abandoned these issues through his failure to adequately argue them. Accordingly, this court declines to address them. See UnitedNo. 96-10323 - 3 - States v. Valdiosera-Godinez , 932 F.2d 1093, 1099 (5th Cir. 1991).

AFFIRMED.
137 Tex.Cr. 513

#### WHATLEY v. STATE.

No. 20459.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct 25, 1939.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of an assault with intent to murder Mrs. Cumie Barrow, and assessed a penalty of twelve years in the penitentiary. Upon appeal, his case was affirmed by this court on June 21, 1939, and a motion for a rehearing therein is now pending.

It is now made known to this court that while in the custody of W. W. Waid, Warden of the State penitentiary, the said Whatley escaped from such institution and custody on September 29, 1939, and has *861not voluntarily surrendered, and is now on this date at large.

Art. 824, C.C.P. Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. art. 824, provides that if the defendant, pending appeal, escapes from custody, the jurisdiction of this court no longer attaches, but that upon his voluntary return within ten days, such appeal shall be reinstated. It appears herein, however, that the ten days allowed for a voluntary return have elapsed, and he is still at large.

Therefore the original opinion herein of date June 21, 1939, is hereby withdrawn, and this appeal is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,415
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,658
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,581
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,308
<PP&E>                                         218,075
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 258,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,264
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           256
<OTHER-SE>                                    (91,610)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   258,046
<SALES>                                         25,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,946
<CGS>                                           17,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,574)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,584)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,990)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,990)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.35)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register: November 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 211)]
[Notices]               
[Page 67450-67451]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02no10-120]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

 
Eighth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 221: Aircraft Secondary 
Barriers and Alternative Flight Deck Security Procedures

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 221 meeting: Aircraft

[[Page 67451]]

Secondary Barriers and Alternative Flight Deck Security Procedures.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 221: Aircraft Secondary Barriers and 
Alternative Flight Deck Security Procedures

DATES: The meeting will be held November 16-17, 2010. November 16th 
from 12 p.m. to 5 p.m., November 17th from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., Colson Board Room, 
1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a RTCA Special Committee 221: Aircraft Secondary 
Barriers and Alternative Flight Deck Security Procedures meeting. The 
agenda will include:
     Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks.
     Approval of Summary of the Seventh Meeting held September 
14-15, 2010, RTCA Paper No. 187-10/SC221-021.
     Leadership Comments.
     Review of Working Group actions--Status Report.
     Discussion of Working Group reports: Re-allocation of 
groups, capture learning points, discuss additional or follow-on goals.
     Presentation of Final Report Draft.
     Break out Sessions--continue work on Final Report Draft.
     Approval and Tasking of Existing/Proposed Working Groups.
     Other Business--Including Proposed Agenda, Date and Place 
for Next Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 22, 2010.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-27643 Filed 11-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
#### KING v. STATE.

No. 18003.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 11, 1936.

Joseph M. Mills, of Fort Worth, Fred Stockdale, of Aspermont, and W. E. Myres, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary. '

This is a prosecution had under the provisions of what is known as the Dean Law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended). Following what has been said by us in the case of Guy Meadows v. State, 88 S.W.(2d) 481, the judgment herein will be reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Moore Medical Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Linda
M. Autore, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and member of
the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

  /s/  Linda M. Autore
--------------------------------
Linda M. Autore
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 28, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      17,627,925
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,630,607
<ALLOWANCES>                                   350,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,307,136
<PP&E>                                       4,251,131
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,069,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,185,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,274,748
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,820
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,824,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,355,447
<SALES>                                      4,780,858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,780,858
<CGS>                                        1,635,646
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,465,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (204,047)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (685,021)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (173,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (307,793)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (307,793)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7291

LONNIE MCDONOVAN GHOLSON, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus LIEUTENANT RICE, UMT in Building Two; MAJOR THORNE; C. E. THOMPSON, Warden; SERGEANT FLEKER; SERGEANT WILLIAMS, Caucasian Male; OFFICER CRUSHFIELD; OFFICER JACKSON, Slim,tall, redhead, male corrections officer working on 8 to 4 shift in Building Two; OFFICER JACKSON, Male, black officer on TAC Team; FAYENEWCOMB, Corrections Officer; CORRECTIONS OFFICER TERRY, Female, black officer working on day shift; CORRECTIONS OFFICER TERRY, Female,black officer working 4 to 12 shift; CORRECTIONS OFFICER HITE, Works in Building One; SERGEANT BOYD; CORRECTIONS OFFICER FREEMAN, Works Building Two on 4 to 12; OFFICER DUFFY; OFFICER JACKSON, Middle age caucasian on TAC team, Defendants - Appellees, and
CORRECTIONS OFFICER ROYSTER; NURSE MONEY; CORRECTIONS OFFICER SMITH, 6 foot 3, dark skin, male officer works on 8 to 4 shift in Building Two; CORRECTIONS OFFICER SMITH, Short, black, male officer who works on 4 to 12 shift; OFFICER TERRY, Defendants.2Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-94-695-2) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 17, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lonnie McDonovan Gholson, Appellant Pro Se. Lance Bradford Leggitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gholson v. Rice , No. CA-94-695-2 (E.D. Va. June 29, 1995; July 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 23



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-36415 and
33-44380), the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-67606, 333-61624,
333-43890 and 333-36415), the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.
33-26442, 33-6141, 33-26443, 33-29144, 33-19012, 2-67317, 33-34363, 33-34362,
33-62648, 333-42231 and 333-52175), and the Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 on
Form S-8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-86061) of Phelps
Dodge Corporation of our reports dated January 28, 2002, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule, which
appear in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 8, 2002