alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued June 2 1 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 1 7 - 0 0 839 - CV

——————————— VIVIAN ROBBINS , Appellant

V. SUSAN SOLIS , Appellee

O n Appeal from the 309 t h District Court

H a rri s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2001 - 37897 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Vivian Robbins , proceeding pro se, ha s neither paid the required filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5, 20.1; see also T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . §§ 51.207, 51.851(b), 51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West 201 3 ); Order, Fe es Charged in t he Supreme Court , in Civil Cases2

in the Courts of Appeals , and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- D istrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15

- 91 58 (Tex. Aug. 28 , 20 15 )
. Furthermore, a ppellant ha s neither paid nor made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record
. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 37.3(b). After being notified by this Court’s May 15, 2018 Order and Notice of Intent to Dismiss for Want of Jurisdiction that this appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless she paid the required fees within 30 days of the date of that order, a ppellant failed to timely respond to that order. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3 (b), ( c )
. Accordingly, w e dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to pay all required fees
. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, B land , and Massengale
.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 18

- 12079 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:17

- cr
- 00048

- MW

- CAS

- 4

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus TYRAIL GALLMAN,
Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida

________________________ ( August 27, 2019 )
Before MARTIN , NEWSOM and HULL , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 18-12079 Date Filed: 08/27/2019 Page: 1 of 22 Attorney Michael Ufferman, appointed counsel for Tyrail Gallman in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
Gallman and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U .S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to wi thdraw is
GRANTED , and Gallman ’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 18-12079 Date Filed: 08/27/2019 Page: 2 of 2
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2881 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the definition 

of applicable large employer for purposes of the employer mandate in 

the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2015 

Mr. MESSER (for himself, Mr. YOUNG of Indiana, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, 

and Mr. MEADOWS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the definition of applicable large employer for purposes 

of the employer mandate in the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Job 

5 Protection Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF APPLICABLE LARGE EMPLOYER. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4980H(c) of the Internal 

8 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2881 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking ‘‘at least 

2 50’’ and inserting ‘‘at least 100’’; and 

3 (2) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ‘‘50’’ each 

4 place it occurs and inserting ‘‘100’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the 

7 amendments made by section 1513 of the Patient Protec8 tion and Affordable Care Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### MIDDLETON v. STATE.

No. 19269.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 5, 1938.

Aubrey Morris, of Waco, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without statement of facts, or bills of exception.

In the absence of the evidence adduced upon the trial, this court is unable to appraise the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

The judgment is affirmed.
[No. 44536-7-I.

Division One.

December 26, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Joe Louis Marroquin, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Whatcom County, No. 99-1-00059-8, Steven J. Mura, J., entered April 6, 1999. *Reversed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
# C_2022210EN.01000201.xml

| 25.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10526 – CHEVRON / NESTE BASE OIL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 210/02)

On 22 February 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10526. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10526. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2022287EN.01000201.xml

| 28.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10798 – NBIM / OXFORD PROPERTIES / SONY CENTER)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 287/02)

On 19 July 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain.It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10798. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10798. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DONNA
KARAN INTERNATIONAL INC. FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                          12,791
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,816
<ALLOWANCES>                                    41,879
<INVENTORY>                                     88,210
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               199,703
<PP&E>                                          65,757
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,609
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 265,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,279
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           216
<OTHER-SE>                                     119,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   265,764
<SALES>                                        306,007
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               306,007
<CGS>                                          238,775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  238,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                73,870
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,867)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,619)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,248)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,248)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(b)


             PEOPLES ENERGY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the combined Annual Report of Peoples Energy
Corporation (the "Company"), The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company ("Peoples
Gas") and North Shore Gas Company ("North Shore Gas") on Form 10-K for the
period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas A. Nardi, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, Peoples Gas and North
Shore Gas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company, Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas.


  /s/  Thomas A. Nardi                                December 14, 2004
----------------------                                -----------------
                                                            Date
Thomas A. Nardi
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of
Peoples Energy Corporation


  /s/  Thomas A. Nardi                                December 14, 2004
----------------------                                -----------------
                                                            Date
Thomas A. Nardi
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of
The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company


  /s/  Thomas A. Nardi                                December 14, 2004
----------------------                                -----------------
                                                            Date
Thomas A. Nardi
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of
North Shore Gas Company
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2799 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2799

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand access to 
         stroke telehealth services under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 2015

Mr. Griffith (for himself, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Harper, 
Mr. Thompson of California, and Mr. David Scott of Georgia) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
  Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand access to 
         stroke telehealth services under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Furthering Access to Stroke 
Telemedicine Act'' or the ``FAST Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANDING ACCESS TO STROKE TELEHEALTH SERVICES UNDER THE 
              MEDICARE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1834(m)(4)(C) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395m(m)(4)(C)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``The term'' and inserting 
        ``Subject to clause (iii), the term''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(iii) Stroke telehealth services.--With 
                        respect to services related to the evaluation 
                        or treatment of an acute stroke that are 
                        provided within the evidence-based window of 
                        treatment, the term `originating site' means 
                        any site at which the eligible telehealth 
                        individual is located at the time the service 
                        is furnished via a telecommunications system, 
                        regardless of where the site is located.''.
    (b) No Originating Site Facility Fee for New Sites.--Section 
1834(m)(2)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(m)(2)(B)) is 
amended, in the matter preceding clause (i), by inserting ``(other than 
an originating site that is only described in clause (iii) of paragraph 
(4)(C), and does not meet the requirement for an originating site under 
clause (i) of such paragraph)'' after ``the originating site''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to services furnished on or after the date that is 1 year after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2800 

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide protections against 

pregnancy discrimination in the workplace, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2015 

Mr. WALBERG (for himself, Mrs. NOEM, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, and Ms. 

JENKINS of Kansas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide protections 

against pregnancy discrimination in the workplace, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pregnancy Discrimina5 tion Amendment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTIONS AGAINST PREGNANCY DISCRIMINA7 TION IN THE WORKPLACE. 

8 Section 701(k) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 

9 U.S.C. 2000e(k)) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2800 IH

1 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘as other 

2 persons not so affected but similar in their ability’’ 

3 and inserting ‘‘as any other applicants for employ4 ment with, or employees employed by, the same em5 ployer, in work that is performed under similar 

6 working conditions, who are not so affected but simi7 lar in their temporary ability’’; and 

8 (2) by inserting after the first sentence the fol9 lowing: ‘‘This subsection shall not permit any labor 

10 organization, or agent of such labor organization, 

11 representing employees of an employer having em12 ployees subject to any provision of this title, directly 

13 or through any collective bargaining agreement 

14 (agreed to by the labor organization, or agent of 

15 such labor organization, and such employer), to 

16 cause or attempt to cause such employer to commit 

17 an unlawful employment practice against an em18 ployee in violation of this subsection.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2022008EN.01000101.xml

| 7.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/1

---

Appointment of the standing high-level independent Chair and Vice-Chair of the Panel referred to in Article 143 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(2022/C 8/01)

The Commission has appointed Ms María Isabel ROFES i PUJOL and Mr IGORS LUDBORŽS as Chair and Vice-Chair respectively of the Panel referred to in Article 143 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) for a non-renewable mandate of five years, following a call for expressions of interest. Ms María Isabel ROFES i PUJOL and Mr Igors LUDBORŽS are designated as special advisers to Commissioner HAHN. Their term of office begins at 17 November 2021 (PV(2021) 2397 final).

---

(1)  Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 21).

---
EXHIBIT 11


                            SBI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                            ------------------------
                      COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                      ----------------------------------------
                            FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
                            -------------------------
                          SEPTEMBER 30 , 1996 AND 1997
                          ----------------------------


                                             Nine Months       Nine Months
                                                Ended            Ended
                                            Sept. 30, 1996    Sept. 30, 1997
                                            --------------   --------------
Shares outstanding:                           5,345,439        5,345,439
Weighted average shares outstanding           5,345,439        5,345,439
Net loss                                   $   (608,007)    $   (741,717)
Preferred Dividend                                --               --
                                           --------------   --------------
Total                                          (608,007)        (366,233)
Net loss per share                         $      (0.11)   $       (0.14)


                                                      Page 12
# C_2022476EN.01003001.xml

| 15.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 476/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 476/30

---

Special report 28/2022:

‘Support to mitigate Unemployment Risks in an Emergency (SURE)’

(2022/C 476/06)

The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 28/2022: ‘Support to mitigate Unemployment Risks in an Emergency (SURE) - SURE financing contributed to preserving jobs during the COVID-19 crisis, but its full impact is not known’.

The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=62745

---
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 14, 2010

d0511 

# Order

May 14, 2010

140216(55)

_____________ _______________ _____________ In re C.V., Minor.

_____________ _______________ _____________

DEAN CUNNINGHAM and RITA CUNNINGHAM, Petitioners-Appellants,

v SC: 140216 COA: 290439 Shiawassee CC Family Division: 08-003565-AO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s March 24, 2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does notappear that the order was entered erroneously.

K ELLY , C.J., would grant reconsideration.