alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-0648 Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-276-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Revision/Deactivati

on/Removal/Inspec

tion/Replacement 33.0 $2,805.0

0

$3,054 $5,859.00 605 $3,544,695.0

0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $3,544,695

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Replacement 5.0 $ 425.00 $0 $ 425.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21228]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Charter Renewal

    In accordance with title 41 of the U.S. Code of Federal 
Regulations, section 102-3.65(a), notice is hereby given that the 
Charter for the National Cancer Institute Council of Research Advocates 
was renewed for an additional two-year period on August 17, 2024.
    It is determined that the National Cancer Institute Council of 
Research Advocates is in the public interest in connection with the 
performance of duties imposed on the National Cancer Institute and 
National Institutes of Health by law, and that these duties can best be 
performed through the advice and counsel of this group.
    Inquiries may be directed to Claire Harris, Director, Office of 
Federal Advisory Committee Policy, Office of the Director, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 1000, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892 (Mail code 4875), Telephone (301) 496-2123, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bed6dfccccd7cdddd2fed3dfd7d290d0d7d690d9d1c8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="375f5645455e44545b775a565e5b19595e5f19505841">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 12, 2024.
Patricia B. Hansberger,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-21228 Filed 9-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2022263EN.01000201.xml

| 8.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10720 – IVANHOE CAMBRIDGE / MUBADALA / DUTCH RESIDENTIAL INVESTMENTS IV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 263/02)

On 29 June 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10720. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10720. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
**RemedyTemp, Inc.**
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Greg Palmer, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RemedyTemp, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 11, 2005     /s/ Greg D. Palmer     Greg D. Palmer  President and Chief Executive Officer  RemedyTemp, Inc.  (Principal Executive Officer)
|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |  |  |
| Delaware                                       | 0-17948 | 94-2838567 |
| (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation) | (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| o      | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|   |   |
| o      | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|   |   |
| o      | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |
| o      | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

|     |
|-----|
|     |  |
| (d) | Exhibits. |

|                  |
|------------------|
|                  |  |  |
| Exhibit No. |    | Description |
|             |   |
| 99.1             |    | Press release dated June 9, 2016 announcing Talbott Roche’s appointment to the Board of Directors of Electronic Arts Inc. |

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
|   |   | ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. |
|   |   |   |   |
| Dated: | June 9, 2016 | By: | /s/ Jacob J. Schatz |
|   |   |   | Jacob J. Schatz |
|   |   |   | Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |

----

|                  |
|------------------|
|                  |  |  |
| Exhibit No. |    | Description |
|             |   |
| 99.1             |    | Press release dated June 9, 2016 announcing Talbott Roche’s appointment to the Board of Directors of Electronic Arts Inc. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001013335
<NAME> BAR TECHNOLOGIES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,816
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,552
<ALLOWANCES>                                       955
<INVENTORY>                                     66,601
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,232
<PP&E>                                          99,706
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 224,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,020
<BONDS>                                        130,253
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,500
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                    (75,794)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   224,946
<SALES>                                        222,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               223,323
<CGS>                                          210,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  210,205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,336
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,077
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,295)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        63
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,358)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,358)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
| **Loan Servicing**                | 12 Months Ended                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
||
| **Banking and Thrift [Abstract]** |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| Loan Servicing                    | LOAN SERVICINGMortgage loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.  The loans are serviced primarily for the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Fannie Mae, and the unpaid balances totaled $254,223,000, $271,871,000 and $167,879,000 at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The amount of capitalized servicing assets is considered immaterial. |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Loan Servicing [Text Block]
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**frme_LoanServicingTextBlock**Namespace Prefix:**frme_**Data Type:**nonnum:textBlockItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_BankingAndThriftAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

37 38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/01 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00030-CR

TRISTON RAY MCDONALD APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1244269D

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Triston Ray McDonald appeals the trial court’s judgment 

adjudicating him guilty of the offense of deadly conduct and sentencing him to 

ten years’ confinement. We affirm.

Appellant pled guilty to deadly conduct pursuant to a plea bargain. The 

trial court followed the plea bargain and placed appellant on deferred 

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

adjudication community supervision for four years. The State subsequently filed 

a motion to adjudicate alleging that appellant had committed three new offenses, 

including aggravated assault by threatening his girlfriend with a firearm. The 

State also alleged that appellant violated the terms of his community supervision 

by possessing a firearm. After hearing evidence, the trial court found that 

appellant had committed the new offense of aggravated assault and that 

appellant had possessed a firearm. The trial court revoked appellant’s deferred 

adjudication community supervision and rendered a judgment adjudicating him 

guilty of deadly conduct.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as 

counsel and a brief in support of that motion. In the brief, counsel states that in 

his opinion the appeal is frivolous and that there are no grounds that could be 

argued successfully on appeal. Counsel’s brief and motion meet the 

requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of 

the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. 386 

U.S. 738, 744–45, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967); see In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 

403, 406–12 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding). Although we gave 

appellant an opportunity to file a pro se response to the Anders brief, he did not 

do so. The State declined to file a brief.

Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on 

the ground that an appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, we 

must independently examine the record. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 
3

511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to

withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief, and we agree 

with counsel that this appeal is frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the 

record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 

S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 

684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to 

withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GABRIEL and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 29, 2015
# C_2022384EN.01000101.xml

| 5.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10696 – ARAMCO OVERSEAS COMPANY / BP EUROPA / LOTOS-AIR BP POLSKA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 384/01)

On 29 September 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10696. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10696. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2022025EN.01000101.xml

| 18.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10450 – CDP / MACQUARIE / OPEN FIBER)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 25/01)

On 10 November 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10450. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10450. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 99(a)


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of IBW Financial Corporation, for
the quarter ended September 30, 2002, I, B. Doyle Mitchell,  Jr.,  President and
Chief Executive Officer of IBW Financial Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to
18  U.S.C.ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant  toss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of IBW Financial Corporation.


 /s/ B. Doyle Mitchell, Jr.
-------------------------------------
B. Doyle Mitchell, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer