alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      12,195,867
<SECURITIES>                                20,654,063
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,265,723
<PP&E>                                       2,277,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                 904,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,892,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,625,507
<BONDS>                                        787,782
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        268
<COMMON>                                        12,530
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,466,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,892,685
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               140,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,050,866
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,871
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,442,344)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,442,344)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,442,344)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.09)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32(b)


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of IBW Financial Corporation for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004, I, Thomas A. Wilson, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of IBW Financial Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March
31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of IBW Financial Corporation.


 /s/ Thomas A. Wilson
------------------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Wilson
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         The undersigned, Edward F. Cooke, Chief Financial Officer of Levcor
International, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
                  ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
                  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"),
                  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ EDWARD F. COOKE
    ---------------------------------
     Name:   Edward F. Cooke
     Title:  Chief Financial Officer, Vice President,
             Secretary and Treasurer


March 23, 2007



================================================================================
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO J. MARTINEZ, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

 v. 

ADOLFO GONZALEZ, San Diego Chief 

Probation Officer, 

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 19-55440 

D.C. No. 

3:17-cv-01760-WQH-AGS 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 2, 2020**

Pasadena, California

Before: HURWITZ and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,*** District 

Judge.

Francisco Martinez was convicted in California state court on two counts of 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge for the 

Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

FILED

MAR 6 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

commodities fraud in violation of California Corporations Code § 29536. The 

district court dismissed Martinez’s subsequent 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition but granted 

a certificate of appealability on two issues. We have jurisdiction over Martinez’s 

appeal under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253(a). Reviewing the district court’s denial 

of the writ de novo, see Poyson v. Ryan, 879 F.3d 875, 887 (9th Cir. 2018), we 

affirm. 

1. In the last reasoned state court decision, the California Court of Appeal,

applying the test in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979), reasonably 

determined that there was sufficient evidence to support Martinez’s commodities 

fraud convictions. See Coleman v. Johnson, 566 U.S. 650, 651 (2012). Taken in the 

light most favorable to the State, the evidence showed that Martinez made false 

statements about the past returns generated by the foreign currency trading company 

with which he was associated and about the company’s ability to mitigate risk on

future returns. The evidence also showed that clients of the company relied on these 

statements. 

2. The Court of Appeal also reasonably determined that the trial court’s 

failure to instruct the jury on the scienter required for commodities fraud under 

California law—knowledge of the statement’s falsity—was harmless under 

Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 22 (1967). The Court of Appeal’s conclusion 

was not based on an unreasonable determination of the facts. See 28 U.S.C. 
3 

§ 2254(d); People v. Martinez, 10 Cal. App. 5th 686, 711-13 (2017).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 179 (Monday, September 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 75540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21124]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, September 19, 2024, 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Hybrid Meeting: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC (12th 
Floor) and Virtual.
    Note: If you would like to virtually access the meeting, see the 
instructions below.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public. To access the meeting 
virtually, go to the commission's website www.fec.gov and click on the 
banner to be taken to the meeting page.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
Draft Advisory Opinion 2024-09: U.S. Representative Nanette 
Barrag[aacute]n and Barrag[aacute]n for Congress
Draft Advisory Opinion 2024-10: Former U.S. Representative Alan 
Lowenthal and Alan Lowenthal for Congress
Draft Advisory Opinion 2024-12: Shawn McCutcheon
REG 2024-01(Candidate Security)--Draft Final Rule and Explanation and 
Justification
REG 2023-02 (Artificial Intelligence in Campaign Ads)--Draft Notice of 
Disposition
Draft Interpretive Rule Regarding 52 U.S.C. 30124 (Artificial 
Intelligence in Campaign Ads)
Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
    Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Laura E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at 
(202) 694-1040 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ff8c9a9c8d9a8b9e8d86bf999a9cd1989089"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bdced8decfd8c9dccfc4fddbd8de93dad2cb">[email protected]</span></a>, at least 72 hours prior to the 
meeting date.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Laura E. Sinram,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-21124 Filed 9-12-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7084

MARCUS DARRELL MACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; NORMAN K. MOON; BRUCE PAGEL; FRANK HARMAN; DAVID R. BEAN, U.S. PROBATION OFFICER; SNOOK & HAUGHEY, Law Firm; JOHN LLOYD SNOOK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-325-7) Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 3, 2003 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marcus Darrell Mack, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Marcus Darrell Mack appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeMack v. United States , No. CA-03-325-7 (W.D. Va. May 16, 2003). Additionally, we decline to consider Mack’s prosecutorial misconduct and sentencing arguments, both raised for the first time on appeal. See Muth v. United States , 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2022068EN.01000601.xml

| 9.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/6

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10608 – CMA CGM / CLS BUSINESS)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 68/04)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | CMA CGM S.A. (‘CMA CGM’, France), |
| --- | --- |

—

CMA CGM S.A. (‘CMA CGM’, France),

| — | CLS Business, controlled by Ingram Micro Inc. (‘Ingram’, United States). |
| --- | --- |

—

CLS Business, controlled by Ingram Micro Inc. (‘Ingram’, United States).

CMA CGM S.A. will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of CLS Business.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares and assets.

2.

| — | CMA CGM offers a range of services related to sea transportation, including container liner shipping and port terminal services. CMA CGM is also active within freight forwarding and contract logistics services through its subsidiary CEVA Logistics, |
| --- | --- |

—

CMA CGM offers a range of services related to sea transportation, including container liner shipping and port terminal services. CMA CGM is also active within freight forwarding and contract logistics services through its subsidiary CEVA Logistics,

| — | CLS Business comprises the contract logistics business of Ingram, currently operated by Ingram’s division Commerce & Lifecycle Services. CLS Business offers a range of services within contract logistics mainly in North America and Europe, notably forward logistics and reverse logistics. |
| --- | --- |

—

CLS Business comprises the contract logistics business of Ingram, currently operated by Ingram’s division Commerce & Lifecycle Services. CLS Business offers a range of services within contract logistics mainly in North America and Europe, notably forward logistics and reverse logistics.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

Case M.10608 – CMA CGM / CLS BUSINESS

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
EXHIBIT
  32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), V. Bryan Lawlis, Chief
Executive Officer of Aradigm Corporation (the Company), and Thomas C.
Chesterman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the
best of his knowledge:

1. The
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
          2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
          Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2. The
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all           material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the           Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
have set their hands hereto as of the 13th day of August 2004.

|/s/ V. BRYAN LAWLIS                         |  | /s/ THOMAS C. CHESTERMAN                               
|------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|                                            |  |                                                        
|V. Bryan Lawlis                             |  | Thomas C. Chesterman                                   
|President and Chief Executive
      Officer |  | Senior Vice President
      and Chief Financial Officer



| |  | 
| |  | 

---
|   | (1) | The Company’s Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/ Jeffrey Siegel                            |                                                                                 |  /s/ Laurence Winoker |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|--------|
| Jeffrey SiegelChief Executive Officer and President | Laurence WinokerSenior Vice President- Finance, Treasurerand Chief Financial Officer |
|                                                |                                                                                 |
| Date: March 17, 2010                                | Date: March 17, 2010                                                                 |
|                                                |                                                                                 |

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                     CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
ICOS Corporation:





We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-48401, 33-80680, 33-64762 and 333-08485) on Form S-8 of ICOS Corporation of
our report dated January 24, 1997, except for Note 8 which is as of February 6,
1997, relating to the balance sheets of ICOS Corporation as of December 31, 1996
and 1995, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1996, and the period from September 21, 1989 (incorporation) through December
31, 1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form
10-K of ICOS Corporation.



/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Seattle, Washington
March 27, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2734 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2734

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ``George P. Kazen 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GEORGE P. KAZEN FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES 
              COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building and United States courthouse 
located at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``George P. Kazen Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 
United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ``George P. Kazen Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate June 7, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2734

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ``George P. Kazen 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.
```
#### HICKS RUBBER CO. v. HARPER.

Application No. 24543.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Nov. 15, 1939.

Tom P. Scott, of Waco, and Benbow & Saunders and Henry D. Akin, all of Dallas, for plaintiff in error.

George Clark and Travis McCown, both of Waco, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

We have concluded that a correct judgment was entered by the Court of Civil Appeals in this cause and, for that reason, dismiss the application for writ of error; but we deem it advisable to take notice of one particular holding of the Court of Civil Appeals, lest it create confusion with respect to an important question of practice. This language appears in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals [131 S.W.2d 749, 752]: “It was held by the Supreme Court in the case of Texas & N. O. Ry. Co. v. Crow [132 Tex. 465], 123 S.W.2d 649, par. 8, that the failure of the trial court to define a term could be reviewed only where the record showed that a special charge defining the term was tendered by the complaining partv.”

That is an incorrect construction of our opinion in the Crow case. What was there held was that the failure to submit a particular *special issue*could be reviewed only where the record showed that a special charge was tendered on that issue. (Italics ours.) By such holding we were but following our previous holding in the two cases there cited. Defining a legal term is not submitting a special issue to the jury, and it is not required of one complaining of the charge of the Court for failure to define a legal term that he prepare and submit a correct definition of such term. All that is required of him is that he object to the charge, specifically complaining of its failure to define the legal term. Robertson & Mueller v. Holden, Tex.Com.App., 1 S.W.2d 570.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,140
<SECURITIES>                                     6,460
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,519
<ALLOWANCES>                                       400
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,036
<PP&E>                                           8,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,463
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           107
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,963
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,753
<SALES>                                          6,402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,402
<CGS>                                              227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,223
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,033)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (183)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,850)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,850)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.2)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.2)
        

</TABLE>