alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022423EN.01000801.xml

| 7.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10922 – INTERPARKING SERVIZI / GKSD / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 423/03)

On 26 October 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10922. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10922. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>

Exhibit 27
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SBI COMMUNICATIONS,
INC. FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

     <S>                               <C>       <C>
     <PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
     <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
     <PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-2000
     <CASH>                                               164
     <SECURITIES>                                           0
     <RECEIVABLES>                                          0
     <ALLOWANCES>                                           0
     <INVENTORY>                                            0
     <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,948,164
     <PP&E>                                         3,940,000
     <DEPRECIATION>                                         0
     <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,140,716
     <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,365,181
     <BONDS>                                        1,200,000
     <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
     <PREFERRED>                                      765,000
     <COMMON>                                           6,070
     <OTHER-SE>                                     1,582,983
     <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,019,080
     <SALES>                                                0
     <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
     <CGS>                                                  0
     <TOTAL-COSTS>                                    241,638
     <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
     <LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
     <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               264,000
     <INCOME-PRETAX>                                        0
     <INCOME-TAX>                                           0
     <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
     <DISCONTINUED>                                         0
     <EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
     <CHANGES>                                              0
     <NET-INCOME>                                    (145,920)
     <EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.05)
     <EPS-DILUTED>                                          0



</TABLE>
#### WADLEY v. STATE.

No. 18748.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 27, 1937.

O. F. Watkins, of Mexia, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary; punishment assessed being two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The indictment properly charges an offense. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Oxford Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
("Form 10-K") for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, J. Hicks Lanier, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and I, K. Scott Grassmyer, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



/s/ J. HICKS LANIER J. Hicks Lanier Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)March 31, 2011/s/ K. SCOTT GRASSMYER K. Scott Grassmyer Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Controller
(Principal Financial Officer)March 31, 2011


---



QuickLinks
#### WITHERS v. BOLLIGER.

No. 12941.

Court of Civil Appeals of *Texas.*Fort Worth.

Nov. 13, 1933.

M. Kleberg, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

J. W. Stitt and Goree & Rice, all of Fort Worth, for appellee.

LATTIMORE, Justice.

This is on a motion for certiorari to place in the transcript, a copy of a mechanic’s lien.

The plaintiff below sued on a note secured by a mechanic’s lien which latter was attempted to be pleaded by describing the land and the volume, page, and place of recordation, and further pleaded “which lien is hereby made a part of this petition as if fully herein set forth.”

Whether or not such is sufficient pleading, it gives no right to appellee to amend his pleadings in this court by inserting a copy of such lien. We cannot grant the writ to the district court, for the original instrument is not in that office. The most that can be contended for such pleading is that it notified the defendant of evidence intended to be offered. As such, it has no greater dignity than any other pleading of facts which a litigant might wish to amend in this court and plead more fully.

The .motion is overruled.
# C_2022245EN.01000201.xml

| 28.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/2

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.10438 – MOL / OMV SLOVENIJA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 245/02)

On 22 June 2022, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.10438 – MOL / OMV SLOVENIJA, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
Ex-10.57



 





Exhibit 10.57




Second Extension Agreement




     This Second Extension Agreement is dated August 16, 2004 between Tollgrade
Communications, Inc., having an address at 493 Nixon Road, Cheswick, PA 15024
(“Tollgrade”) and Dictaphone Corporation, acting through its Electronic
Manufacturing Services Division, with an address at 3900 W. Sarno Rd.,
Melbourne, FL 32934 (“Dictaphone”).



     WHEREAS, Tollgrade (as successor in interest to Acterna Corporation) and
Dictaphone are parties to a Supply Agreement dated July 25, 2002, which sets
forth the terms pursuant to which Dictaphone manufactures and supplies to
Tollgrade, and Tollgrade purchases from Dictaphone, certain products (the
“Supply Agreement”);



     WHEREAS, the Supply Agreement was scheduled to expire on July 24, 2004,
and pursuant to that certain Extension Agreement dated July 21, 2004, the
parties extended the term of the Agreement through August 20, 2004;



     WHEREAS, Tollgrade and Dictaphone desire to replace the Supply Agreement
with a new supply agreement, but have not yet completed negotiations with
respect to such new supply agreement; and



     WHEREAS, Tollgrade and Dictaphone desire to further extend the term of the
Supply Agreement through September 30, 2004 or until a new supply agreement is
executed, if sooner;



     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises contained herein and for
other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:



     1. Extension of Supply Agreement. The parties hereby agree that the
Supply Agreement is hereby extended through September 30, 2004 or until such
time as the parties execute a new supply agreement, if sooner.



     2. Miscellaneous. Except as extended hereby, the provisions of the
Supply Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This Second Extension
Agreement will be governed in all respects by the laws of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania without reference to any choice of law provisions. This Second
Extension Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the
different parties hereto on separate counterparts, each of which, when so
executed, shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall
constitute but one and the same instrument.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the date
first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.	 	DICTAPHONE CORPORATION
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jennifer M. Reinke
	 	By:
	 	/s/ James Davis	 	 	 	 
	

	 	

	 	 	 	
	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Jennifer M. Reinke
	 	Name:
	 	James Davis	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	Assistant Secretary
	 	Title:
	 	Sr. VP, Operations
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 19

- 00260

- CR

LABBERRIUS QUDON EVANS, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court Franklin County, Texas Trial Court No. F

- 9330

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 O R D E R Our review of the clerk’s record, the supplemental clerk’s record, and the State’s exhibit three in this case indicates that they contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security number, tax identification number or similar government

- issued personal identification number.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(a)(1). The clerk’s record, the suppleme ntal clerk’s record, and the State’s exhibit three include social security numbers. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive d ata.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(b). Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the clerk’s record, the supplemental cle rk’s record, and the State’s exhibit three contain sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal these electronically filed records.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: February 25, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
SEC form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.  
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                              18
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      333
<ALLOWANCES>                                        19
<INVENTORY>                                        253
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   927
<PP&E>                                           3,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              936
<BONDS>                                            794
<COMMON>                                           579
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (791)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,261
<SALES>                                          3,612
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,612
<CGS>                                            2,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   514
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     4
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  87
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    337
<INCOME-TAX>                                       106
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                231
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       231 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.64 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.40
        

</TABLE>
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2814 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs communitybased outpatient clinic in Sevierville, Tennessee, the 

Dannie A. Carr Veterans Outpatient Clinic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2814 RFS

1 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

2 Congress makes the following findings: 

3 (1) The State of Tennessee, the Volunteer 

4 State, holds a proud tradition of selfless vol5 unteerism to the United States Armed Forces. 

6 (2) Specialist Four Dannie A. Carr, of Sevier 

7 County, Tennessee, served with distinction in B 

8 Company, 2nd Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, 1st 

9 Cavalry Division during the Vietnam War in defense 

10 of the United States. 

11 (3) Specialist Four Dannie A. Carr, twice 

12 wounded in battle and later killed in action by artil13 lery fire on July 3, 1969, has been duly recognized 

14 by the Army, having been awarded the Bronze Star 

15 for Valor and the Purple Heart. 

16 (4) The heroism of Dannie A. Carr is well 

17 known and held in high regard within the commu18 nity of Sevier County, Tennessee. 

19 (5) The municipalities of Pittman Center, 

20 Sevierville, Pigeon Forge, Gatlinburg, and Sevier 

21 County have agreed to and passed resolutions sup22 porting the renaming of the Department of Veterans 

23 Affairs community-based outpatient clinic in Sevier 

24 County, Tennessee, in honor of Specialist Four 

25 Dannie Arthur Carr. 


smartinez on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2814 RFS

1 SEC. 2. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 COMMUNITY-BASED OUTPATIENT CLINIC, 

3 SEVIERVILLE, TENNESSEE. 

4 The Department of Veterans Affairs community5 based outpatient clinic located at 1124 Blanton Drive, 

6 Sevierville, Tennessee, shall after the date of the enact7 ment of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Dannie 

8 A. Carr Veterans Outpatient Clinic’’. Any reference to 

9 such community-based outpatient clinic in any law, regula10 tion, map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

11 States shall be considered to be a reference to the Dannie 

12 A. Carr Veterans Outpatient Clinic. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 1, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
*OPINION ISSUED MAY 14, 2009*

#### *270DONALD EAKLE VS. DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS

(CC-09-0087)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Charles P. Houdyschell Jr., Senior Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant, an inmate, seeks to recover $127.05 in personal property that he alleges was misplaced by respondent. Claimant’s personal property, including one pair of Wolverine boots and one pair of Nike tennis shoes, was accounted for and secured at Stevens Correctional Center before his transfer to Slayton Work Camp located at Mount Olive Correctional Complex. On September 26,2008, claimant arrived at Mount Olive Correctional Complex where his property was inventoried and held for seventy-two hours. On October 1, 2008, when claimant went to retrieve his property, his boots and shoes were missing. In its Answer, respondent admits the validity of the claim and the amount.

This Court has taken the position in prior claims that if a bailment situation has been created, respondent is responsible for property of an inmate which is taken from that inmate, remains in its custody, and is not produced for return to the inmate.

Accordingly, the Court makes an award to the claimant herein in the amount of $127.05.

Award of $127.05.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-28,586-09

EX PARTE RICHARD BRYAN KUSSMAUL, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1993-773-C2I IN THE 54TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM MCLENNAN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murder

and sentenced to imprisonment for life.

Applicant contends that he is actually innocent and that had scientific evidence been

presented at trial, on the preponderance of the evidence he would not have been convicted. Ex parte

Elizondo, 947 S.W.2d 202 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.073. We order

that this application be filed and set for submission to determine whether: (1) Applicant’s claims are
2

barred by Article 11.07, § 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure; (2) Applicant is actually innocent;

and (3) Applicant is entitled to relief under Article 11.073. The parties shall brief these issues.

It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If that is not correct, the trial court shall

determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and desires to be represented by

counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant. TEX.CODECRIM. PROC. art

26.04. The trial court shall send to this Court, within 60 days of the date of this order, a

supplemental transcript containing: a confirmation that Applicant is represented by counsel; the

order appointing counsel; or a statement that Applicant is not indigent. All briefs shall be filed with

this Court within 90 days of the date of this order.

Filed: November 9, 2016

Do not publish
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICT Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Vincent A. Paccapaniccia, Executive Vice President, Corporate Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                 |  |                                    
|---------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|November 3, 2006 |  | /s/ Vincent A. Paccapaniccia       
|                 |  | Vincent A. Paccapaniccia           
|                 |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate
|                 |  | Finance and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2022442EN.01002101.xml

| 22.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 442/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 442/21

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10806 – BROADCOM / VMWARE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 442/07)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Broadcom, Inc. (‘Broadcom’, United States), |
| --- | --- |

—

Broadcom, Inc. (‘Broadcom’, United States),

| — | VMware, Inc. (‘VMware’, United States). |
| --- | --- |

—

VMware, Inc. (‘VMware’, United States).

Broadcom will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of VMware.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of securities.

2.

| — | Broadcom is a technology company that designs, manufactures, and provides a broad range of semiconductors and infrastructure software solutions, |
| --- | --- |

—

Broadcom is a technology company that designs, manufactures, and provides a broad range of semiconductors and infrastructure software solutions,

| — | VMware is active in IT software including virtualisation and related workload management technologies for data centres and cloud computing environments, application development, and endpoint management. |
| --- | --- |

—

VMware is active in IT software including virtualisation and related workload management technologies for data centres and cloud computing environments, application development, and endpoint management.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10806 – BROADCOM / VMWARE

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---