alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 31, 2017

N o. 04

- 17

- 00455

- CR

Peter TREVINO

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR3106

Honorable Sid L. Harle, J udge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellant’s brief

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to Novemb er 29, 2017.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_______________ ___________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Nicholas LaHood

Bexar County District Attorney's Office

101 W. Nueva St.

San Antonio, TX 78205 William T. Reece, Jr.

Attorney At Law

107 Wo odward Place

San Antonio, TX 78204
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

I, Javier O. Lamoso, the president of ClearComm, L.P., certify that (i) theMarch 31, 2005 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the March 31, 2005 10-Q Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofClearComm, L.P.

 

 
|   | /s/ Javier O. Lamoso |   |
|--------|----------------------|--------|
|   | Javier O. Lamoso     |   |
|   | President            |   |
|   | May 23, 2005    |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with Quarterly Report of Park Bancorp, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2006, (the Report), I, Steven
J. Pokrak, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (3) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Steven J. Pokrak

Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2006



.
### ATTACHMENT A
**– Part II, Section A, 1, d.**  **- SANITIZED**  **The HallStar Company**

Page 1**C O** **N F** **I D** **E N** **T I** **A L**  PART II, SECT ION A, QUESTION (1)(d). **1. d. (1)**

### ATTACHMENT A
**– Part II, Section A, 1, d.**  **- SANITIZED**  **The HallStar Company**

Page 2 **d.(2) -**  **(weight is per batch)**

**d.(3)**


### 
Dismiss and Opinion Filed April 19, 2024

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 23

- 01097

- CV

SHACOREYA LAMB , Appellant

V. FOREST 9750 LP , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 23

- 03960

- A

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Smith, Miskel, and Breedlove Opinion by Justice Breedlove

A ppellant’s brief in this case is overdue. After appellant failed to r espond to

our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without

a reporter’s record and for appellant’s brief to be filed by March 10, 2024. By

postcard dated March 12, 2024 , we informed appellant h er brief was overdue and

d irected appellant to file a brief within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure

to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See T EX

.

R. A PP

. P . 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed a brief n or otherwise

c orresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.– 2

–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b),

(c).

231097f.p05 /Maricela Breedlove/ MARICELA BREEDLOVE JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

SHACOREYA LAMB, Appellant

No. 05

- 23

- 01097

- CV V.

FOREST 9750 LP, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 23

- 03960

- A. Opinion delivered by Justice Breedlove. Justices Smith and Miskel participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered this 19 th day of April

, 2024

.
WALTER REDD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-0849

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 23, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

William F. Stone, Judge.

Walter Redd, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, CLARK, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
SCPIE Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 12, 2004



/s/ ROBERT B. TSCHUDYRobert B. TschudyChief Financial Officer




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          34,383
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  260,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,731
<INVENTORY>                                    171,919
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               537,592
<PP&E>                                       5,864,315
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,546,231
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,124,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          392,947
<BONDS>                                      2,288,210
<COMMON>                                        43,507
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     925,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,124,254
<SALES>                                      2,364,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,486,846
<CGS>                                        1,421,731
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,466,002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               325,279
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             177,420
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                169,126
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,228
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            133,898
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   133,898
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.88
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21327]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 336 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-638, CP2024-647.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21327 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
### State Implementation Plan Completeness Checklist

40 CFR Part 51 Appendix V: Section 2.0 Criteria

Check YES or NO to determine if a formal SIP revision submittal is complete. If

the SIP submission is being parallel processed, only check YES or NO behind the

numbers with an *. Attached?

2.1 Administrative Materials



### 1. Submittal lett er (Governor or designee) Yes

No



### 2. Evidence of adoption which contains:

a. Actual copy of regulatory changes Yes

No

b. 

### Date adopted Yes

No

c. 

### Date effective Yes

No

d. 

### Signatory r equirements Yes

No



### e. *If parallel processing, schedule for final adoption or issuance Yes

No

Not Applicabl e

f. 

### *Copy of the proposed/draft regulations Yes

No



### 3. *Legal authority (evidence that state has necessary legal authority to

adopt and implement revision )

– Nebras ka’s legal authority is

established in section 81

- 1505 (1), (12), and (17

- 18) of the Nebraska

Environmental Protection Act. Yes

No



### 4. Copy of public notice Yes

No



### 5. Certification that public hearing was held Yes

No



### 6. Compilation of public comments and state responses Yes

No

2.2. Technical Support

Section Not Applicable ?

1. 

### Pollutants affected by the change Yes

No

2. 

### Sources affected Yes

No

3. 

### Quantification of the changes in emissions (actual/allowable) Yes

No

4. 

### Demonstration of protection: NAAQS Yes

No



### PSD increments YesNo



### RFP Yes

No



### Visibility Yes

No

5. 

### Full modeling information Yes

No

6. 

### Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on

continuous emission

. Yes

No



### 7. Evidence that a revision contains emission limitations, work practice

standards, and recordkeeping/reporting requirements

. Yes

No



### 8. Compliance/enforcement strategies including how compliance will be

determined in practice, and at what frequency. Yes

No



### 9. As appropriate, special economic and technological justifications per

applicable EPA policies. Yes

No
Exhibit 15.1











Awareness Letter of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








August 15, 2022








Electronic Arts Inc. Redwood City, California





With respect to this registration statement on Form S-8 of Electronic Arts Inc. filed on August 15, 2022, we acknowledge our awareness of the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated August 9, 2022, related to our review of the interim financial information.


Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.











/s/ KPMG LLP


Santa Clara, California
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                OF

                   CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                OF

                     COMMERCIAL PROPERTY CORP.


          COMMERCIAL PROPERTY CORP. (the "Corporation"), a corporation
organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

          FIRST:  That the Board of Directors of the Corporation at a meeting
duly held, adopted resolutions proposing and declaring advisable the following
amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation of said Corporation:

          RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of this
          corporation be amended by amending the Article thereof numbered
          "FIRST" so that, as amended said Article shall be and read as
          follows:

          "The name of the corporation is PARKER-LEVITT CORPORATION."

          SECOND: That said amendments have been approved and authorized by
the vote of in excess of a majority of the holders of all the issued and
outstanding stock of the Corporation entitled to vote at a special meeting of
stockholders of said Corporation.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said COMMERCIAL PROPERTY CORP. has caused its
corporate seal to be hereunto affixed and this certificate to be signed by
Cosmo J. Caterino, its President, and Robert J. Patten, its Secretary, this
6th day of December 1976.

                         COMMERCIAL PROPERTY CORP.


                             By/s/Cosmo J. Caterino
                              President


                              /s/Robert J. Patten
                   ATTEST:    Secretary


STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS)
                      )  SS.:
COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX   )

     BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this 6th day of December, 1976, personally
came before me a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid,
Cosmo J. Caterino, President, and Robert J. Patten, Secretary of COMMERCIAL
PROPERTY CORP., a corporation of the State of Delaware, the corporation
described in and which executed the foregoing certificate, known to me
personally to be such, and they, the said Cosmo J. Caterino as such President
and Robert J. Patten as such Secretary duly executed said certificate before
me and acknowledged the said certificate to be their act and deed and the act
and deed of said Corporation; that the signatures of said President and of the
Secretary of said corporation to said foregoing certificate are in the
handwriting of the said President and Secretary of said Corporation
respectively; that the seal affixed to said certificate is the common or
corporate seal of said Corporation; that the facts stated in the foregoing
certificate are true; and that the act of sealing, executing, acknowledging
and delivering said certificate was duly authorized by the Board of Directors
and Stockholders of said Corporation.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal of office the
day and year aforesaid.

                              /s/Shirley J. Federline
                         Notary Public
                         My commission expires May 30, 1980
#### O’KEEFE et al. v. POWER.

No. 4716.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.

May 4, 1936.

Rehearing Denied May 18, 1936.

N. C. Outlaw, of Post, for appellants.

Price & Moss, of Post, for appellee.

HALL, Chief Justice.

Power sued Simon, Virginia, and Dayton O’Keefe in the county court of Garza county on a verified account, alleging that defendants were partners. Defendants answered. The case was tried to the court without a jury, and on December 17, 1935, judgment was entered for the appellee against all the appellants, jointly and severally, for $288.88. Amended motion for new trial was filed and overruled on December 20,' 1935, and notice of appeal given the same day. Supersedeas bond on appeal was duly filed. The court expired February 3, 1936. The transcript was not delivered to appellants’ attorney until April 4, 1936, and received in this court on April 6, 1936.

Article 1839, Revised Statutes, as amended by the Acts of the 42d Legisláture, at page 100, c. 66, as amended by Acts 1933, c. 67 (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 1839), provides that the appellant shall file his transcript with the clerk of the Court of Civil Appeals within sixty days from the final judgment or order overruling motion for new trial; provided, by motion filed before, at, or within a reasonable time, not exceeding fifteen days, after the expiration of such sixty-day period, showing good cause to have existed within such sixty-day period, why said transcript could not be so filed, the Court of Civil Appeals may permit the same to be thereafter filed upon such terms as it shall prescribe. Motion for permission to file the record was not filed in this court until April 11, 1936.

In reply to the motion asking permission to file the record, the appellant had seventy-five days after the motion for new trial was overruled and notice of appeal given within which to file his motion, setting up good grounds, if any, for permission to have it filed later, and by affidavit show to this court good reason why it was not so filed within the required time. Appellants not only failed. to file the record within the sixty days, but their motion for permission to file the record has been filed more than one hundred days after the required time.

In Shipp v. Metzger Dairies (Tex.Civ.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 660, the court holds that where the appellant does not file his statement of facts within the sixty-day period, and fails to file a motion for additional time within fifteen days thereafter, the Court of Civil Appeals is without jurisdiction to permit the filing of the statement, or entertain such motion. This is in accordance with the rule announced in Red v. Bounds, 122 Tex. 614, 63 S.W.(2d) 544.

*204For the reasons stated, appellants’ motion to file the transcript is overruled, and appellee’s motion to affirm on certificate is granted.
Second Amendment to the Premcor Inc. Flexible Benefits Plan dated October 1, 200



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 
 PREMCOR INC. FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN 
  
 WHEREAS, Premcor
Inc. (“Company”) previously adopted the Premcor Inc. Flexible Benefits Plan, part of the Premcor Inc. Benefit Contribution Plan (“Plan”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan therein; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan effective January 1, 2005 to
increase the maximum reimbursement amount for health care expenses; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, effective January 1, 2005, the Plan is amended as follows: 
  
 1. Section, 4.01 is deleted and in its place is substituted the following: 
  
 Section 4.01 Reimbursements Contributions. For any Plan Year, each Member may elect to have contributed to his or her
Account a specified amount of his or her Compensation for such Plan Year up to a maximum of $5,000 for Health Care and $5,000 for Dependent Care to be used to fund Reimbursement Benefits (all employees). 
  
 2. The first paragraph of Section 7.02 is deleted and in its place is
substituted the following: 
  
 Section
7.02 Amount of Benefits. The maximum amount of Reimbursement Benefits payable for a Plan Year shall be $5,000 for Health Care Expenses and $5,000 for Dependent Care Expenses, subject to further limitations described under Sections 8.06
and 9.06. 
  
 3. Section 8.06 is deleted and in its place is
substituted the following: 
  
 Section
8.06 Further Limitation. The amount of Benefits for a Member during any year shall not exceed $5,000. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed this 1 day of Oct, 2004. 
  

			
	 PREMCOR INC.

		
	 By
	 	/s/    JAMES R. VOSS        
	 	 	 James R. Voss, Senior Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
consolidated  balance sheets  of TV Filme,  Inc. at June 30, 1998 and the
consolidated  statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 1998 
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                            1,000  
                                                               
<S>                                               <C>          
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           6-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1998  
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-1998  
<CASH>                                                 72,676  
<SECURITIES>                                                0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                           9,626  
<ALLOWANCES>                                            4,142  
<INVENTORY>                                             5,126  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       95,833  
<PP&E>                                                 87,885  
<DEPRECIATION>                                         29,649  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        162,457  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  15,407  
<BONDS>                                               140,000  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0  
<PREFERRED>                                                 0  
<COMMON>                                                  108  
<OTHER-SE>                                              1,455  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          162,457  
<SALES>                                                24,078  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       24,078  
<CGS>                                                  10,037  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          11,316  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       10,650  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        4,662  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     (9,449) 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (19,801) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (19,801) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0  
<CHANGES>                                                   0  
<NET-INCOME>                                          (19,801) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (1.83) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (1.83) 
                                                               
                                                               


</TABLE>
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Robert William Richardson

, * From the 90 th District Court

o f Stephens County,

Trial Court No

. F35551

Vs. No. 11

- 19

- 00 307

- CR * October 21

, 20 2 1

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.