alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022471EN.01000501.xml

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10929 – GENERALI REAL ESTATE / MUNICH RE / SAXON LAND)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 471/05)

On 5 December 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10929. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10929. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT 10.14

              PROMISSORY NOTE ISSUED TO PARK-PREMIER MINING COMPANY
                              DATED JANUARY 1, 2002




<PAGE>


                           CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE

$332,470.36
                                                                Denver, Colorado

                                                                 January 1, 2002

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED,  PARK-CUMMINGS  MINING COMPANY,  a Utah corporation
(the  "Maker"),  hereby  promises  to pay to the  order of  Park-Premier  Mining
Company (the  "Holder"),  the principal sum of Three Hundred Thirty Two Thousand
Four Hundred Seventy and 36/100 US Dollars ($332,470.36), together with interest
on the unpaid  balance  at the rate of Twelve  Percent  (12%) per  annum,  on or
before January 1, 2003, subject to conversion as described below.

         This Note is subject to prepayment,  in whole or in part, at the option
of the  maker  without  penalty.  Such  prepayments  shall be  applied  first to
interest and then to the principal due hereunder.

         In case this Note shall not be paid in full  whenever  it shall  become
due, the Maker  without  penalty.  Such  prepayments  shall be applied  first to
interest accrued and then to the principal due hereunder.

         In case this Note shall not be paid in full  whenever  it shall  become
due,  the maker agrees to pay all costs and  expenses of  collection,  including
reasonable attorney's fees, not to exceed 15% of the unpaid balance.

         All rights and  obligations  hereunder shall be governed by the laws of
the State of Colorado.

         This Note is unsecured.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the Maker has signed this Note effective as of the
date first above written.

                                  PARK-PREMIER MINING COMPANY



                                  By: /S/ ROBERT W. DUNLAP
                                     -----------------------------------
                                  Its:   PRESIDENT
                                     -----------------------------------


Description: Expense Advances



A:/02PROMNOTES.DOC
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2761 

To amend the Clean Air Act to clarify when a physical change in, or change 

in the method of operation of, a stationary source constitutes a modification, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2018 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Clean Air Act to clarify when a physical 

change in, or change in the method of operation of, 

a stationary source constitutes a modification, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF MODIFICA4 TION. 

5 Section 111(a)(4) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 7411(a)(4)) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘(4) The term ‘modification’ 

8 means’’ and inserting the following: 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2761 IS

1 ‘‘(4) MODIFICATION.— 

2 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘modifica3 tion’ means’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(B) ASSOCIATED DEFINITION.—For pur6 poses of subparagraph (A), a physical change 

7 in, or change in the method of operation of, a 

8 stationary source shall be considered to increase 

9 the amount of any air pollutant emitted by the 

10 stationary source only if the maximum achiev11 able hourly emissions rate of the stationary 

12 source after the change will be higher than— 

13 ‘‘(i) the maximum achievable hourly 

14 emissions rate of the stationary source as 

15 the stationary source was originally de16 signed; and 

17 ‘‘(ii) the maximum hourly emissions 

18 rate of the stationary source that was ac19 tually achieved during the 10-year period 

20 preceding the change.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1




                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I,  Dennis  Sunshine, Chief Executive Officer of Orbit International Corp.,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as enacted by  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     the  Annual  Report  on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2008  (the "Annual Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with
the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934;  and

     (2)     information  contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations of Orbit
International  Corp.

Dated: March 31, 2009
                                   /s/ Dennis Sunshine
                                   -------------------
                                   Dennis Sunshine
                                   Chief Executive Officer

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Orbit International Corp. and will
be  retained  by  Orbit  International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
Rosa Lee Rodriguez, as next 

friend of Flora s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 4, 2015

No. 04-15-00049-CV

MORNINGSIDE MINISTRIES d/b/a Morningside Ministries at the Manor and the 

Morningside Ministries Foundation, Inc.,

Appellant

v.

Rosa Lee RODRIGUEZ, as next friend of Flora Mendez,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-07530

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion to Abate Appeal to Finalize Settlement is GRANTED. The 

appeal is abated for 30 days.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of November, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

         The undersigned, John W. Hyde, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Executive Officer of Film Roman, Inc.(the “Company”), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 (the “Report”).The undersigned hereby certifies that:

                    (1)        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                    (2)         the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |        |                                                                                              |
|-----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: August 14, 2003 |   | /s/ JOHN W. HYDE                                                                             |
|                  |        |                                                                                              |
|                  |        | Name:    John W. Hyde                                                         |
|                  |        | Title:     Chief Executive Officer, and                                  |
|                  |        |               Chief Financial Officer |

38
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2570 

To repeal the funding authorization sunset and the total funding cap for 

the Essex National Heritage Area. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 19, 2018 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself and Ms. WARREN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To repeal the funding authorization sunset and the total 

funding cap for the Essex National Heritage Area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ESSEX NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA. 

4 (a) REPEAL OF FUNDING AUTHORIZATION SUN5 SET.—Section 507 of division II of the Omnibus Parks 

6 and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 (Public Law 

7 104–333) is repealed. 

8 (b) REPEAL OF TOTAL FUNDING CAP.—Section 

9 508(a) of division II of the Omnibus Parks and Public 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2570 IS

1 Lands Management Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–333) 

2 is amended by striking the last sentence. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                      (Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, (i) the
foregoing Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed by Yadkin Valley Company (the
"Registrant") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

Date: January 5, 2006                /s/ DAVID S. PERRY
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     David S. Perry, President and Treasurer
                                     (principal executive and financial officer)



                                       16
#### LAIRD v. STATE.

No. 18462.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 6, 1936.

Lloyd W. Davidson,. State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for four years.

Upon the written request of the appellant, duly verified by his affidavit, the appeal is dismissed.
# C_2022402EN.01000401.xml

| 19.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10660 – MONTAGU / HG / WAYSTONE / KB ASSOCIATES)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 402/04)

On 30 June 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10660. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10660. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION*

         In connection with the Annual Report of Retail Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John C. Rossler, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

                          /s/ John C. Rossler
                          ------------------------------------------------------
                          John C. Rossler, President and Chief Executive Officer
April 29, 2004

* This Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed "filed" for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability
of that section. This Certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except as otherwise stated in such filing.
# C_2022269EN.01002401.xml

| 13.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/24

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10789 – GOLDMAN SACHS / SOJITZ / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 269/02)

On 4 July 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10789. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10789. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 73695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20451]



[[Page 73695]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3610-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Puerto Rico; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-3610-EM), dated August 13, 2024, 
and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued August 26, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective August 16, 2024.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-20451 Filed 9-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,409,376
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,676,119
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                131,777,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      32,499,693
<DEPRECIATION>                              (9,648,463)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             175,545,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     81,497,437
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       462,553
<OTHER-SE>                                  67,284,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               175,545,890
<SALES>                                    102,310,452
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           111,619,295
<CGS>                                       89,360,041
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               94,100,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,312,095
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             674,697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (467,777)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (553,066)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             85,289
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    85,289
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02

<FN>
Company reports on a non-classified Balance Sheet.
</FN>

</TABLE>
#### BUCHMAN v. HOLMGRAM.

No. 13123.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

March 1, 1935.

Julien C. Hyer and A. W. Christian, both of Fort Worth, for appellant.

W. A. Hawkins, of Fort Worth, for appel-lee.

BROWN, Justice.

Appellant is in the business of lending money. He loaned appellee $100 and at the time the loan was made, as a part of the transaction, required appellee to purchase a $10 coupon, supposed to be issued by Merchants’ Coupon Service Company, of New York City.

The coupon gives the owner the right to buy $40 worth of undesignated merchandise and to apply the coupon toward the payment of $10 on the purchase thus made.

Appellee signed a bit of writing, saying she had purchased that day from the loan company a Merchants’ Coupon Service Company coupon with a value of $10 which was issued by the said company, the purchase being from its fiscal agents.

The extra $10 was then incorporated in the note appellee executed, payable to appellant.

Appellant sued to recover the entire face of the note. Appellee answered with proper averments, showing that the extra $10 put into the note is usury and the coupon transaction a mere subterfuge; admitted owing the $100 with interest, and asked that judgment for only such sum and interest be rendered against her.

The case was tried to the court. No statement of facts is before us, but there are found findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The court found, among other matters, that the coupon was purchased by appellee at the solicitation of appellant and that the loan would not have been made if appellee had not applied for and accepted the coupon.

The court concluded that the appellant was not entitled to recover for the coupon because the defendant has not derived and will not derive any benefit from the coupon, and no damage has been or will be done appellant by reason of the issuance of same, and that there was no consideration for the $10 included in the note from the coupon transaction; and that appellant was entitled to judgment against appellee in the sum of $100 with 10 per cent, interest, from the date of the note.

Plaintiff below has appealed, because of his failing to recover the face of the note.

The findings and judgment of the trial court brand the transaction as one tainted with usury, and in which a subterfuge has been employed for the purpose of covering up the illegal contract.

The contract relating to the purchase of the coupon is too indefinite and uncertain to be binding upon either party. It is unilateral and unenforceable.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.