alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# No. 17-0400 

# The Supreme Court of Texas

STATE FARM LLOYDS Petitioner / Cross-Respondent

v. DENNIS WEBB Respondent / Cross-Petitioner

On Petition for Review from the Ninth Court of Appeals—Beaumont, Texas No. 09-15-00408-CV

JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLIES TO THE PETITIONS FOR REVIEW Petitioner State Farm Lloyds and Cross-Pe titioner Dennis Webb file this Joint Motion for Extension of Time to file rep lies to the responses to the Petitions for Review filed by the parties pursuant to Te xas Rule of Appella te Procedure 10.5(b), and respectfully states as follows: 1. This is the first request for an ex tension of time to file replies to the petitions for review in this case. FILED 17-0400 12/20/2017 1:23 PM tex-21407597 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK2 2. The current deadline for State Farm Lloyds to file its motion is January 4, 2018.

3. The current deadline for Webb to f ile his motion is also January 4, 2018. 4. The parties have agreed to reques t an extension of the deadline to file their motions until and including Monday, February 5, 2018. The extension is

needed to accommodate c ounsel for both parties, who have numerous preexisting family obligations associated with the Christmas and New Year’s holidays. The relief sought by this motion is so that just ice may be done, and is not sought solely for delay or any other improper purpose.

PRAYER
WHEREFORE, Petitioner State Farm Lloyds and Cross-Petitioner Dennis Webb respectfully request the Court extend the response deadline until and including February 5, 2018.3 Dated: December 20, 2017 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ J. Hampton Skelton By: /s/ Gregory F. Cox (with permission) J. Hampton Skelton Gregory F. Cox State Bar No. 18457700 State Bar No. 00793561 hskelton@skeltonwoody.com Brandon Kinard Edward F. Kaye State Bar No. 24079744 State Bar No. 24012942 T HE M OSTYN L AW F IRM ekaye@skeltonwoody.com 6280 Delaware Street Eva C. Ramos Beaumont, Texas 77706 State Bar No. 20143100 Tel: (409) 832-2777 eramos@skeltonwoody.com Fax: (409) 832-2703 S KELTON & W OODY 248 Addie Roy COUNSEL FOR Building B, Suite 302 DENNIS WEBB Austin, Texas 78746-4100 Tel: (512) 651-7000 Fax: (512) 651-7001

COUNSEL FOR STATE FARM LLOYDS4 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE I hereby certify that counsel for State Farm Lloyds conferre d with counsel for Dennis Webb concerning the merits of this Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Replies to the Petitions for Review. All parties are in agreement concerning the relief sought herein.

/s/ J. Hampton Skelton J. Hampton Skelton

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on December 20, 2017, counsel of record listed below was served with a copy of the foregoing document via facsimile. I further certify that on the same date, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which may send not ification of such filing to counsel of record: Mr. Gregory F. Cox Via facsimile (409) 832-2703 Mr. Brandon Kinard T HE M OSTYN L AW F IRM 6280 Delaware Street Beaumont, Texas 77706

/s/ J. Hampton Skelton J. Hampton Skelton
Form Notice of Grant of Stock Option



 Exhibit 10.39 
  
 AXESSTEL, INC. 
  
 NOTICE OF GRANT OF STOCK OPTION 
 [                     20     Pool Option] 
  
                              (the “Optionee”) has been granted an option
(the “Option”) to purchase certain shares of Stock of Axesstel, Inc., a Nevada corporation, pursuant to the Stock Option Agreement attached hereto (the “Agreement”), as follows: 
  

			
	Date of Option Grant: 	 	 
		
	Number of Option Shares: 	 	 
		
	Exercise Price:	 	$         per share
		
	Initial Exercise Date:	 	Date of Option Grant
		
	Initial Vesting Date:	 	Date of Option Grant
		
	Option Expiration Date:	 	The date ten (10) years after the Date of Option Grant.
		
	Tax Status of Option:	 	Nonstatutory Stock Option. (Enter “Incentive” or “Nonstatutory.” If blank, this Option will be a Nonstatutory Stock Option.)

  
 Vested Shares: Except as
provided in the Stock Option Agreement, the number of Vested Shares (disregarding any resulting fractional share) as of any date is determined by multiplying the Number of Option Shares by the “Vested Ratio” determined as of
such date as follows: 
  

			
	 	  	Vested Ratio


	 Prior to Initial Vesting Date
	  	0
	 For each completed three-month period of the Optionee’s continuous Service after Initial Vesting Date until the Vested Ratio equals
1/1,
	  	1/12

  
 By their signatures
below, the Company and the Optionee agree that the Option is governed by this Notice and by the provisions of the Stock Option Agreement, which is attached to and made a part of this document. The Optionee acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Stock
Option Agreement, represents that the Optionee has read and is familiar with its provisions, and hereby accepts the Option subject to all of its terms and conditions. 
  

			
	 AXESSTEL, INC.
	 	OPTIONEE
		
	 By:                                      
                                        
                                   
	 	                                      
                                        
                                        
        
	 	 	Signature
		
	 Its:                                      
                                        
                                   
	 	                                      
                                        
                                        
        
	 	 	Date
		
	 ATTACHMENTS: Stock Option Agreement
	 	                                      
                                        
                                        
        
	 	 	Address
		
	 	 	                                      
                                        
                                        
        

  

 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 328 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-614, CP2024-622.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21315 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

[MAXTOR LOGO]

MAXTOR INTERNATIONAL S.A.R.L.                 VAT NR. 512 646
Saint-Honore 2
CH-2001 Neuchatel

SWITZERLAND

                               LETTER OF GUARANTEE

Bank of China Suzhou Branch:

Maxtor Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd (the "borrower") has entered into a Foreign
Exchange Loan Agreement (No. YZDZ (2003) No. 197) on October 10, 2003.
To secure the full performance of the Loan Agreement, Maxtor International
S.a.r.l ("Guarantor") hereby makes its guarantees under the provisions of the
Security Law of the People's republic of China as follows:

1. Maxtor International S.a.r.l shall act as a guarantor and secure the
performance by borrower of all of the obligations under the Loan Agreement.

2. If due to whatever reason that the Loan Agreement has been breached by the
borrower thereunder, Guarantor shall immediately perform its guarantee
obligation unconditionally and effectuate all payment including without
limitation to all the principal, interest, penalty, indemnity and any relevant
expenses to the lenders according to the instructions of the latter.

3. The guarantee made by Guarantor under this Letter shall constitute a joint
liability of Guarantor.

4. The guarantee made under this Letter shall be an irrevocable guarantee, the
validity of which shall continue till the day when all the indebtedness under
the Loan Agreement has been fully discharged.

5. The Execution and performance of this Letter shall be to Guarantor's own
wills and in Guarantor's good faith. Guarantor has obtained all necessary
authority to execute and perform this Letter. Such authorization and the
execution and performance under such authorization shall not contradict any of
the provisions of the by-laws of Guarantor or of any regulations or contract
that have binding force upon Guarantor. All the process concerning the execution
and performance of this Letter has been handled in due course and maintain its
validity.

<PAGE>

6. This Letter and the rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall be
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of People's Republic of
China.

7. The Guarantor agrees that any legal action or proceeding arising out of or
relating to this Letter may be brought in the courts of People's Republic of
China.

Guarantor:

Signed by:

Maxtor International S.a.r.l
                                              Maxtor Intl Sarl
                                                St-Honore 2
                                              CH-2001 Neuchatel
                                                Switzerland
        /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]
------------------------------------
Authorised signatory & Company stamp

Date: August 16, 2004
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-2145

___________ Gary Barfield, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Arvindra Brar, M.D., Delta Regional * Eastern District of Arkansas. Unit, Arkansas Department of * Correction; Max Mobley, Deputy * [UNPUBLISHED] Director of Health and Correctional * Programs, Arkansas Department of * Correction; Regina Jacob, Infirmary * Supervisor, Delta Regional Unit, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: November 28, 2001 Filed: December 6, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN, BRIGHT, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Gary Barfield brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action complaining that appellees and others were deliberately indifferent to his need for knee surgery. The district1 The HONORABLE SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the HONORABLE J. THOMAS RAY, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- court 1 granted summary judgment to appellee Max Mobley because he was not involved in the knee surgery decision. After an evidentiary hearing, the court (1) dismissed the claims against Dr. Arvindra Brar because she repeatedly treated Barfield’s knee condition, and his assertion that he required knee surgery was simply a disagreement over the proper course of medical treatment; and (2) dismissed the claims against Regina Jacob because she did nothing but respond to Barfield’s grievances by reviewing his medical file. Barfield appeals these rulings. After de novo review of the record, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s orders and deny Barfield’s motion for appointment of counsel. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report of Endologix, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2009 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d));
and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: July 28, 2009
    By:
    /s/ John McDermottJohn McDermottPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

        Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  --------------------------------------------------------------------


In connection with the Annual Report of Paradise, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for
the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jack M.
Laskowitz, as Chief Financial Officer of Paradise, Inc., certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
Paradise, Inc.


         /s/ Jack M. Laskowitz                    Date:  March 31, 2006
       ----------------------------
       Jack M. Laskowitz
       Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
# C_2022329EN.01000301.xml

| 31.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/3

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10898 – PLATINUM EQUITY GROUP / HOP LUN)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 329/03)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Platinum Equity, LLC (‘Platinum Equity Group’, USA), |
| --- | --- |

—

Platinum Equity, LLC (‘Platinum Equity Group’, USA),

| — | Hop Lun Limited (‘Hop Lun’, Hong Kong), belonging to the group Siu Sing Investment Limited (British Virgin Islands), |
| --- | --- |

—

Hop Lun Limited (‘Hop Lun’, Hong Kong), belonging to the group Siu Sing Investment Limited (British Virgin Islands),

Platinum Equity Group will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Hop Lun.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Platinum Equity Group is a global investment that specializes in the merger, acquisition and operation of companies that provide services and solutions to customers in a broad range of businesses, including information technology, telecommunications, logistics, metal services, manufacturing and distribution. |
| --- | --- |

—

Platinum Equity Group is a global investment that specializes in the merger, acquisition and operation of companies that provide services and solutions to customers in a broad range of businesses, including information technology, telecommunications, logistics, metal services, manufacturing and distribution.

| — | Hop Lun is a global supplier of quality fashion lingerie and swimwear. |
| --- | --- |

—

Hop Lun is a global supplier of quality fashion lingerie and swimwear.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10898 – PLATINUM EQUITY GROUP / HOP LUN

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23 - 0 527

_________________ EMMANUEL F. GOMEZ ,

Petitioner and Appellant , v. ST ATE OF MONTANA ,

Respondent and Appellee. O R D E R

_________________ Appellant Emmanuel R. Gomez was granted an extension of time to file and serve the opening brief on or before March 22 , 2024 . T he opening brief is now overdue. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file , and serve the opening brief on appeal no later than May 2 , 2024 . Failure to file the brief within that time will result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all parties .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 4 2024

04/04/2024
Case Number: DA 23-0527
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 21.01

                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                            OF PACIFIC ENTERPRISES

Burney Mountain Power
Central Plants, Inc.
Coalition Undertaking Remedial Efforts, Inc.
EcoTrans OEM Corporation
Ensource
FTM Sports Corporation
Landfill Control Technologies
Mammoth Geothermal Company
Mammoth Power Company
Mt. Lassen Power
Pacific Bio-Energy Company
Pacific Enerchange
Pacific Energy
Pacific Energy Resources Incorporated
Pacific Enterprises
Pacific Enterprises ABC Corporation
Pacific Enterprises Commercial Loans, Inc.
Pacific Enterprises International
Pacific Enterprises International Argentina I
Pacific Enterprises Leasing Company
Pacific Enterprises LNG Company
Pacific Enterprises Oil Company
Pacific Enterprises Oil Company (Canada)
Pacific Enterprises Oil Company (USA)
Pacific Enterprises Oil Company (Western)
Pacific Enterprises Minerals Company
Pacific Gas Gathering Company
Pacific Geothermal Company
Pacific Hydropower Company
Pacific Interstate Company
Pacific Interstate Mojave Company
Pacific Interstate Offshore Company
Pacific Interstate Transmission Company
Pacific Interstate Transmission Company (Arctic)
Pacific Library Tower
Pacific Lighting Corporation
Pacific Lighting Gas Development Company
Pacific Lighting Land Company
Pacific Lighting Real Estate Group
Pacific Offshore Pipeline Company
Pacific Oroville Power, Inc.
Pacific Penobscot Power Company
Pacific Recovery Corporation
Pacific Synthetic Fuel Company
Pacific Western Resources Company
Pacific Wood Fuels Company
Pacific Wood Power
Pay'n Save Drug Stores, Incorporated


<PAGE>

Penstock Power Company
Presley-Home Mac Finance Co., Inc.
Presley RAC Finance Co., Inc.
Southern California Gas Company
Southern California Gas Tower
8309 Tujunga Avenue Corp.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RASHAUN KELLY, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-356

)

KELLY SERVICES, INC., )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed November 2, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Larry Helms, Judge.

Rashaun Kelly, pro se Appellant.

Cherie L. Silberman of Constangy, Brooks, 

Smith, & Prophete, Tampa,

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MORRIS, BADALAMENTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
# C_2022379EN.01001501.xml

| 3.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/15

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10763 – NORDEA / TOPDANMARK LIV HOLDING)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 379/09)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Nordea Bank Abp (‘Nordea’, Finland), |
| --- | --- |

—

Nordea Bank Abp (‘Nordea’, Finland),

| — | Topdanmark Liv Holding A/S (‘Topdanmark Liv Holding’, Denmark), belonging to the group Topdanmark A/S (Denmark), controlled by Sampo plc (Finland). |
| --- | --- |

—

Topdanmark Liv Holding A/S (‘Topdanmark Liv Holding’, Denmark), belonging to the group Topdanmark A/S (Denmark), controlled by Sampo plc (Finland).

Nordea will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Topdanmark Liv Holding.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Nordea is a Finnish bank which offers a range of financial services, including retail banking, corporate banking, investment banking, capital markets services, asset management and insurance primarily in the Nordics, |
| --- | --- |

—

Nordea is a Finnish bank which offers a range of financial services, including retail banking, corporate banking, investment banking, capital markets services, asset management and insurance primarily in the Nordics,

| — | Topdanmark Liv Holding is the holding company of Topdanmark Livsforsikring A/S, which is active in the life insurance and pension industry in Denmark. |
| --- | --- |

—

Topdanmark Liv Holding is the holding company of Topdanmark Livsforsikring A/S, which is active in the life insurance and pension industry in Denmark.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10763 – NORDEA / TOPDANMARK LIV HOLDING

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---