alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Curtis’s Estate.

*Wills*— Revocation—Beneficiary *under revoked will*— Issue *devisavit vel non*— Refusal.

A beneficiary under a will revoked by the testator has no standing to contest the validity of a subsequent will in which such beneficiary is not named, and an issue devisavit vel non petitioned for by such contestant is properly refused.

Argued March 21, 1916.

Appeal, No. 23, Jan. T., 1916, by William de Forrest Curtis, from decree of O. C. Philadelphia Co., Jan. T., 1915, No. 419, refusing an issue devisavit vel non in Estate of L. Scovill Curtis, deceased.

Before Brown, C. J., Mestrezat, Potter, Moschzisker and Frazer, JJ.

Affirmed.

*390Petition for issue devisavit vel non. Before Anderson, J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

The court dismissed the petition. William de Forrest Curtis appealed.

*Error assigned*was in refusing an issue devisavit vel non.

*Chester N. Farr, Jr.,*with him *Oswald Chew,*for appellant.

*John C. Johnson,*with him *Joseph H. Taulane,*for appellees.

April 17, 1916 :

Per Curiam,

Whether the testator was competent to execute the will dated November 11,1914, is, so far as this appellant is concerned, immaterial. He asks for an issue devisavit vel non because he claims to have an interest in the estate of the testator under an earlier will, executed in 1907. It clearly appeared from the testimony that the testator had destroyed that will when he was fully competent to do so, and this fact, properly found by the court below, left the appellant without any interest in the estate of the testator and with no standing as a contestant of the will executed in 1914.

Decree affirmed at appellant’s costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM CAFETERIA OPERATORS, L.P. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,972
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      867
<ALLOWANCES>                                        27
<INVENTORY>                                      6,267
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,257
<PP&E>                                         103,955
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,107
<BONDS>                                         63,655
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (30,030)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,344
<SALES>                                        146,516
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               146,516
<CGS>                                           44,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               108,172
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,063)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,063)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,063)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Advance
Paradigm, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1996 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          26,070
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                       130
<INVENTORY>                                      1,524
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,309
<PP&E>                                           7,747
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,696
<BONDS>                                          7,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,304
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,222
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,554
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               107,829
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  102,994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,495
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (147)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,487
<INCOME-TAX>                                       311
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,176
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,176
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1--FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT FOR
              FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The annual financial statements and independent auditor's report thereon for
First Merchants Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan for the year ending
December 31, 1999, will be filed as an amendment to the 1999 Annual Report on
Form 10-K no later than March 30, 2000.
701 A.2d 846

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, v. David H. CLARK.

Misc. Docket AG, No. 58,

Sept. Term, 1997.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Oct. 27, 1997.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Consent to Disbarment from the practice of law filed by David H. Clark in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-712 d2, and the written recommendation of Bar Counsel, it is this 27th day of October, 1997

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that David H. Clark, be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of David H. Clark from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-713, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.
Exhibit 32

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Norwood Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, William W. Davis, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer, and Lewis J. Critelli, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| /s/ William W. Davis, Jr.             |   | /s/ Lewis J. Critelli                                |
|---------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| William W. Davis, Jr.                 |   | Lewis J. Critelli                                    |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

November 9, 2009
#### J. S. LEMLEY v. STATE.

No. 18396.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 3, 1936.

State’s Rehearing Denied June 17, 1936.

Roy A. Scott, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Ben J. Dean, Dist. Atty., of Breckenridge, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is arson; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for four years.

Cleve Barnes v. State, 95 S.W.(2d) 112, this day delivered, is a companion case. The errors requiring a reversal of the judgment in Barnes Case also appear in the present record. °

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
<PAGE>




                                                                 Exhibit 23
                                                                 ----------


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  consent  to   the  incorporation   by  reference  of   our  report   dated
February 27, 1997, on  our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
the  financial statement  schedule  of Pacific  Bell  and Subsidiaries  as  of
December 31, 1996  and 1995,  and for each  of the  three years in  the period
ended December  31, 1996, which  report is included  in this Annual  Report on
Form 10-K, and in Pacific Bell's registration statement as follows:

     Form S-3:  Pacific Bell $1.575 Billion Debt Securities



/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
San Francisco, California
March 28, 1997
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022243EN.01006101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 27.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/61 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10758 – EIM / BROOKFIELD / NIELSEN)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 243/11)

1.

On 20 June 2022 the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022243EN.01006101-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Elliott Investment Management L.P. (‘EIM’, USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Brookfield Private Equity Holdings LLC (‘BPEH’), controlled by Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (‘Brookfield’, both Canada), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Nielsen Holdings Plc (‘Nielsen’, USA). |

EIM and BPEH will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Nielsen.

The concentration is accomplished by way of acquisition of shares or other means.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | BPEH: subsidiary of Brookfield, which provides asset management services, focused on real estate, infrastructure, renewable power, and private equity, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | EIM: investment firm focused on investment and risk management activities, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Nielsen: global audience insights, data, and analytics company, which provides audience measurement, media planning, marketing optimization, and content metadata solutions. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022243EN.01006101-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10758 – EIM / BROOKFIELD / NIELSEN

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022243EN.01006101-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022243EN.01006101-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
# C_2022153EN.01001001.xml

| 7.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10586 – MGL / MSP / O’CONNOR / MCLAREN RACING)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 153/04)

On 29 March 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10586. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10586. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of State ofConnecticut Department ofMental Health and Addiction Services 

### TRADING AGREEMENt-AND ORDERNO 8101 

### MODIFICATION

TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDER MODIFICATION In the maner ofa Trading Agreement and Order between the Commissioner ofEnvironmema! Protection ("Commissioner") and the Commissioner ofthe Department ofMental Health and 

### Addiction Services ("DMHAS"). \VHEREAS, the Commissioner and DMHAS, having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and Order No.8 Jal issued on July 16, 1996, do now, by mutual agreement, modify paragraphs C.l., C.1.E., C.3. and C.I0. as follows: 1. Change the second date specified in paragraph C.1. from May 1, 1999 to 

### May 1,2003. 2. Replace paragraph C.I.E. as follows: No later than March I ofthe years 1999, 2000, 200l, 2002, 2003 and 2004, include with its alUluaJ emissions repon to the Commissioner, NOx emissions and ERCs used for the previous calendar year, in monthly increments; 3. Change the date specified in paragraph C.3. from May 1, 1999 to May 1,2003. 4. 

### Change the date specified in parograph C.IO. 

### from May I, 1999 

### to May 1,2003.
All other terms and conditions of**Tra~ing** Agreement and Order No. 810I issued by the Commissioner acting under Sections 22a-6, 22a* 171, 22a-174, 22a* 176, 22a-177 and 22a-178 of the Connecticut General Statutes shall remain in effect.

# Initials:~**(Printe~** on Recyclcd P.per) 79 Elm SHeet • !fmford, CT 06J06

- 5127 hnp:/idep.SUle.C1.IIS An Equl'! Opporrullity Emp!oyu

# Date~J

### State ofConnecticut Department ofMental Health and Addiction Services 

### 2 TRADfNG AGREEMENT AND ORDER NO. 8101 MODIFICATION**~.** 

### The State ofConnecticut Department ofMental Health and Addiction Services hereby consents to the entry ofthis 

### modification to 

### the Trading Agreement and Order without further notice. The State ofConnecticut Department ofMental Health and Addiction Services Signature: 

### Type Name; Type Title;

Date: Albert J. Solnit, M.D. 

### Commissioner. Stale ofConnectjcut. Department gfPublic Health and Addiction Services



# ___**·~.=..I** f2(9)

1999. 

### Entered as amodification ofan Order ofthe Commissioner ofEnvironmental Protection numbered 

### 8101 this

__

# ",,2 0

# 9_._dayof

hur 1. 

### Rocque, Jr. ommlSSloner 

### TOWN OF MIDDLETOWN LAND RECORDS MAILED CERTIFIED MAIL,

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Certified Document No.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00623

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF Marjorie A. CHILDS , Deceased

From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- PC

- 0056 Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this c ourt’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Costs of this appeal are taxed against appellee Mollie Ch ilds.

SIGNED April 20, 2016.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Exhibit 21-A


                        OTTER TAIL POWER COMPANY

                      Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                             March 1, 2001


Company                                        State of Organization

Minnesota-Dakota Generating Company                  Minnesota
Otter Tail Realty Company                            Minnesota
Otter Tail Energy Services Company, Inc.             Minnesota
Otter Tail Energy Management Company                 Minnesota
Otter Tail Management Corporation*                   Minnesota
ORD Corporation*                                     Minnesota
Quadrant Co.*                                        Minnesota
Varistar Corporation                                 Minnesota
Northern Pipe Products, Inc.                         North Dakota
Northern Micro, Inc.                                 North Dakota
Vinyltech Corporation                                Arizona
T.O. Plastics, Inc.                                  Minnesota
Precision Machine, Inc.                              North Dakota
Dakota Machine, Inc.                                 North Dakota
Dakota Engineering, Inc.*                            North Dakota
BTD Manufacturing, Inc.                              Minnesota
DMS Health Technologies, Inc.                        North Dakota
DMS Imaging, Inc.                                    North Dakota
DMS Leasing Corporation                              North Dakota
Aerial Contractors, Inc.                             North Dakota
Moorhead Electric, Inc.                              Minnesota
Chassis Liner Corporation                            Minnesota
Chassis Liner Credit Corp.*                          Minnesota
E. W. Wylie Corporation                              North Dakota
Midwest Information Systems, Inc.                    Minnesota
Midwest Telephone Co.                                Minnesota
Osakis Telephone Company                             Minnesota
The Peoples Telephone Company of Bigfork             Minnesota
Data Video Systems, Inc.                             Minnesota
MIS Investments, Inc.                                Minnesota
Otter Tail Communications SD, Inc.*                  South Dakota
Fargo Baseball, LLC                                  Minnesota
Fargo Sports Concession LLC                          Minnesota
KFGO, Inc.*                                          North Dakota




*Inactive
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1233 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1233

 To prohibit any Federal official from expending any Federal funds for 
  any population control or population planning program or any family 
                           planning activity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2009

  Mr. Paul (for himself, Mrs. Bachmann, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Burton of 
 Indiana, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Terry, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. 
McCotter, and Mr. McClintock) introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the 
   Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit any Federal official from expending any Federal funds for 
  any population control or population planning program or any family 
                           planning activity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taxpayers' Freedom of Conscience Act 
of 2009''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL FUNDING FOR POPULATION CONTROL.

    No Federal official may expend any Federal funds for any population 
control or population planning program or any family planning activity 
(including any abortion procedure), irrespective of whether such 
program or activity is foreign or domestic.
                                 <all>
```