alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1997 
<CASH>                                      5,053,000
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                               2,643,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                   24,000 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            8,631,000       
<PP&E>                                    546,630,000      
<DEPRECIATION>                             14,117,000    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            630,324,000      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      78,474,000    
<BONDS>                                             0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                      254,000 
<OTHER-SE>                                291,615,000       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              630,324,000         
<SALES>                                             0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           41,250,000          
<CGS>                                               0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              36,188,000          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             5,483,000       
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         5,483,000      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                5,483,000 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .22 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .14 
        
                                  


</TABLE>
AIR RESOURCES BOARDVENTURA COUNTY APCD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 1I. GENERAL INFORMATIONDistrict: Ventura County APCDRule No.: 74.2Date / Amended: January 12, 2010Rule Title: Architectural CoatingsDate Submitted to ARB: March 15, 2010If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended: November 13, 2001Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA asa SIP Revision? (X) Yes ( ) NoIf NO, do not complete remainder of form.District Contact: Stan CowenPhone No.: 805/645-1408Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: () New Rule (X) Amended Rule 74.2Amended Rule 74.2 incorporates all the new ROC limits and coating categories from ARB’s 2007 SuggestedControl Measure. This includesnew ROC limits for many different coating categories.Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Circle): ROGNOx SO2 PM10 COTACII. EFFECT ON EMISSIONSComplete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emission. Attach reference(s) for emission factor(s) and otherinformation. Attach calculation sheet showing howthe emissions information provided below was determined. See staff report Appendix A for emission calculations.Net Effect on Emissions: ( ) Increase (X) Decrease ( ) N/AEmission Reduction Commitment in SIP (Control Measure R-329) for this source category: To Be DeterminedInventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: 2004Area Affected: CountyFuture Year Control Profile Estimate:YearTons/yearReductions2004 BaselineTons/yearSubject to RuleControlLevelPercentControlControlLevelControl Factor2011 82/718=0.114 * 100 =11.4 %1.00- 0.114=0.8862012100/718=0.139 * 100 =13.9 %1.00- 0.139=0.861The 2004 baseline emissions were based on ARB’s statewide 2004 survey in California.AIR RESOURCES BOARDVENTURA COUNTY APCD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUSDistrict is: ( ) Attainment (X) Nonattainment () SplitApproximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule: N/APercent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %Number of Large (>100 TPY) Sources Controlled: NonePercent in Nonattainment Area: Not ApplicableIV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGYDoes the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes, the coating limits are in the form ofgrams of ROC per liter of coating lesswater and less exempt organic compounds.V. OTHER REQUIREMENTSThe Rule Contains:Emission Limits in Section(s): Section BWork Practice Standards: Section BContainer Labeling Requirements: Section CReporting Requirements in Section(s): Section EVI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN(X) No Impact ( ) Impacts RFP ( ) Impacts attainmentDiscussion: Amendments to Rule 74.2 will reduce emissions of reactive organic compounds for Ventura County’s efforts towardachieving attainment of the ozone standard. Therefore, RFP will be furthered by amendments to Rule 74.2.
<table>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12.1

                                   PACIFIC ENTERPRISES
                    COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   (Dollars in millions)

<caption>





                                1998        1999        2000        2001       2002
                              --------    --------    --------    --------   --------

                           <c>         <c>         <c>         <c>         <c>
Fixed Charges:

Interest                          $ 84        $ 82        $ 72        $ 88       $ 63
Interest portion of
  annual rentals                    11           3           4           3          2
Preferred dividends
  of subsidiaries (1)                2           2           2           2          2
                              --------    --------    --------    --------   --------
Total Fixed Charges
  for Purpose of Ratio            $ 97        $ 87        $ 78        $ 93       $ 67
                              ========    ========    ========    ========   ========

Earnings:

Pretax income from
  continuing operations           $274        $350        $396       $377        $383
Total Fixed Charges
  (from above)                      97          87          78         93          67
                              --------    --------    --------    -------   ---------
Total Earnings for
  Purpose of Ratio                $371        $437        $474       $470        $450
                              ========    ========    ========    =======   =========
Ratio of Earnings
  to Fixed Charges                3.82        5.02        6.08       5.05        6.72
                              ========    ========    ========    =======   =========

(1)	In computing this ratio, "Preferred dividends of subsidiaries" represents the
before-tax earnings necessary to pay such dividends, computed at the effective tax
rates for the applicable periods.

</table>
Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of nStor Technologies,
Inc. (the  "Company")  for the period ended  December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"),  I, H.
Irwin Levy,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information  contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ H. Irwin Levy
-----------------------------
H. Irwin Levy
Chief Executive Officer
March 20, 2003


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  This statement is
not deemed to be "filed" with the Securities and Exchange  Commission as part of
the report on Form 10-K.
```

[Federal Register: October 7, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 194)]
[Notices]               
[Page 62176]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07oc10-95]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7194]

 
Department of State Performance Review Board Members

    In accordance with section 4314(c)(4) of 5 United States Code, the 
Department of State has appointed the following individuals to the 
Department of State Performance Review Board for Senior Executive 
Service members: James H. Thessin, Chairperson, Deputy Legal Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State; Tracy H. Mahaffey, 
Executive Director, Bureau of Diplomatic Security, Department of State; 
Joseph A. Mussomeli, Ambassador, Department of State; Wanda L. Nesbitt, 
Ambassador, Department of State; and Khushali P. Shah, Chief of Staff, 
Office of the Director of U.S. Foreign Assistance, Department of State.

    Dated: September 27, 2010.
Nancy J. Powell,
Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human 
Resources, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-25336 Filed 10-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-15-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,191
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,263
<PP&E>                                             103
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 285,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,974
<BONDS>                                        233,648
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,069
<OTHER-SE>                                    (30,224)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   285,466
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   108
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,599
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,491)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,491)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (396)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (527)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kelcy L. Warren, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 11, 2008



/s/ Kelcy L. WarrenKelcy L. WarrenChief Executive Officer


*A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to
and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 73688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20499]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4798-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Texas; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas (FEMA-4798-DR), dated July 9, 2024, and related 
determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued August 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas is hereby amended to include the following areas 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
July 9, 2024.

    Austin, Bowie, Shelby, Trinity, and Waller Counties for 
Individual Assistance (already designated for debris removal and 
emergency protective measures [Categories A and B], including direct 
Federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-20499 Filed 9-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00521

- CR

Magdalena Ortiz
v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 09CR4251

- C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 27, 2015
II 

Calendar No. 454 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2692 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

4558 Broadway in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Stanley Michels Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2018 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 

Security and Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 14, 2018 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4558 Broadway in New York, New York, 

as the ‘‘Stanley Michels Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STANLEY MICHELS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 4558 Broadway in New York, 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2692 RS

1 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Stanley 

2 Michels Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Stanley Michels Post 

7 Office Building’’. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS

amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 454 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2692 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. York, New York, as the ‘‘Stanley Michels Post al Service located at 4558 Broadway in New 

JUNE 14, 2018 

Reported without amendment 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
[No. 45751-9-I.

Division One.

December 11, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Donald Raymon Weaver, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-1-01563-9, Nicole Machines, J., entered December 3, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
                                  RESTRAC, INC
 
                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
               (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                             DECEMBER 31,
                                                                        -----------------------
                                                                           1997         1996
                                                                        ----------   ----------
<S>                                                                     <C>          <C>
BASIC:
  Net income (loss)...................................................  $      103   $     (308)
                                                                        ==========   ==========
  Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding.................   8,202,461    7,895,053
  Conversion of preferred stock.......................................                       --
  Basic weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares
     outstanding......................................................   8,202,461    7,895,053
                                                                        ==========   ==========
  Basic net income (loss) per share...................................  $     0.01   $    (0.04)
                                                                        ==========   ==========
DILUTED:
  Net income (loss)...................................................  $      103   $     (308)
                                                                        ==========   ==========
  Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding.................   8,202,461    7,895,053
  Dilutive effect of options outstanding..............................     355,206           --
  Diluted weighted average number of common and common equivalent
     shares outstanding...............................................   8,557,667    7,895,053
                                                                        ==========   ==========
DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE...................................  $     0.01   $    (0.04)
                                                                        ==========   ==========
</TABLE>
#### FIRST NAT. BANK OF HEMPHILL v. GOODRICH.

No. 2283.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

April 13, 1932.

Rehearing Granted May 4, 1932.

W. I. Davis, of Center, and Minton & Min-ton, of Hemphill, for appellant.

TV. T. Davis, of San Augustine, Geo. E. Holland, of Beaumont, and John B. Eorse, of Newton, for appellee.

O’QUINN, J.

At a former day of this term, we granted a motion to affirm this cause on certificate. Appellant has filed its motion for rehearing, and asks that the judgment of affirmance be set aside and the motion to affirm dismissed.

The judgment appealed from was rendered by the district court of Sabine county on May 18, 1931. Motion for a new trial was overruled on said date and notice of appeal to this court duly given. The appeal was perfected on June 17, 1931, by appellant filing its appeal bond. No transcript in the cause was filed herein by appellant. On March 24, 1932, appellee filed his motion for affirmance on certificate. This motion was granted. By motion for rehearing, appellant asks that the affirmance be set aside and the motion to affirm be dismissed because it came too late, being filed at a subsequent term of this court to which the appeal was returnable — the term beginning on Monday, October 5, 1931.

 The affirmance was improvidently granted. The appeal was returnable to the term of this court ending October 4, 1931. Article 1816, R. S. 1925 (as amended by Acts 1927, 1st Called Sess., c. 50, § 1 [Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 1816]). The motion to affirm was not filed until March 24,1932, which was at a subsequent term. It is well settled that appellee’s right to an affirmance on certificate expires with the expiration of the term of the court to which the appeal was returnable. 3 Tex. Jur. § 536, p. 748; Laughlin v. Dabney, 86 Tex. 120, 24 S. W. 259; Perkins v. Williams (Tex. Civ. App.) 47 S.W.(2d) 659; Farmers’ & Merchants’ Lumber Co. v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 45 S.W.(2d) 754; Lumbermen’s Reciprocal Ass’n v. James (Tex. Civ. App.) 35 S.W.(2d) 458; Herndon v. Ridley (Tex. Civ. App.) 297 S. W. 309; Ross v. Cantrell (Tex. Civ. App.) 278 S. W. 927; Bank v. Hix (Tex. Civ. App.) 156 S. W. 535.

The motion for rehearing is granted, the judgment of affirmance set aside, and the motion for affirmance dismissed.