alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99(b)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of IBW Financial Corporation for the
quarter ended March 31, 2003, I, Thomas A. Wilson, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of IBW Financial Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March
31, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of IBW Financial Corporation.

/s/ Thomas A. Wilson
-------------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Wilson
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### MORGAN v. STATE.

No. 20154.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 12, 1938.

*399Lindsey & Vaughan, and O. H. Woodrow, all of Sherman, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Conviction is for assault to rape, punishment, ninety years confinement in the penitentiary.

The transcript fails to show that any sentence was ever pronounced against appellant. Art. 769, C.C.P., provides that in all felony cases, save where the death penalty has been assessed, sentence shall be pronounced “before the appeal is taken.” In such cases it has always been held that sentence was prerequisite to appeal, 'and that, in the absence of a sentence, this court is without jurisdiction. Nichols v. State, 123 Tex.Cr.R. 448, 59 S.W.2d 388.

The appeal is dismissed.
[No. 45122-7-I.

Division One.

October 23, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Albert Alan Sanders, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 92-1-02244-0, Norma Smith Huggins and Glenna Hall, JJ., entered August 19, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Gina Gutzeit, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterended March 31, 2003 of aaiPharma Inc. (the “registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s fiscal quarter being reported (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date:June 24, 2004 /s/ Gina Gutzeit  Gina Gutzeit Interim Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of China RuiTai International Holdings Co, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Gang Ma, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  April 15, 2010 /s/ Gang Ma Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001013274
<NAME> IBW FINANCIAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,011
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             700
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    132,087
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        116,747
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 267,749
<DEPOSITS>                                     206,987
<SHORT-TERM>                                    40,534
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,914
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        500
<COMMON>                                           668
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,146
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 267,749
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,783
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,062
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   186
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,031
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,943
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,821
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,210
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (1)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,909
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,220
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,220
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       959
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.42
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.28
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,138
<LOANS-PAST>                                       694
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  6,572
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,272
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      350
<RECOVERIES>                                       160
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,082
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,082
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,264


</TABLE>
#### JACKSON v. STATE.

No. 20049.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 21, 1938.

Horace H. Shelton, of Austin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The appellant was-convicted of burglary, and assessed a penalty of two years confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us with a statement of facts that reflect the guilt of appellant of the offense of burglary with intent to steal. The indictment appears regular, and the proof was evident. There are no bills of exception in the record. We see nothing further to review.

The judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                                  CERTIFICATION

        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Richard P. Thompson, Chief Executive
Officer of Aradigm Corporation (the "Company"), and Thomas C. Chesterman, Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify
that, to the best of his knowledge:

        The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1
(the "Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the
periods covered by the Periodic Report.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of
this 8th day of November, 2002.


                                         /s/ RICHARD P. THOMPSON
                                         ----------------------------
                                         RICHARD P. THOMPSON
                                         CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


                                         /s/ THOMAS C. CHESTERMAN
                                         ----------------------------
                                         THOMAS C. CHESTERMAN
                                         SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND
                                         CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
| (1)    | the      Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                              |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PG&E      Corporation. |

|   | PETER A. DARBEE                             |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | PETER      A. DARBEE                        |
|   | Chairman,      Chief Executive Officer, and |
|   | President                                   |

----

|                  (1) | the      Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                              |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                      |                                                                                                                                                        |
|                  (2) | the      information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PG&E      Corporation. |

|   | KENT M. HARVEY                 |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   | KENT      M. HARVEY            |
|   | Senior      Vice President and |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         416,366
<SECURITIES>                                   987,892
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,488,838
<PP&E>                                         185,591
<DEPRECIATION>                                (71,603)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,154,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          339,518
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           295
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,814,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,154,518
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               375,645
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (375,645)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (375,645)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (375,645)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76889-76890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21333]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

[[Page 76890]]

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 302 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-623, CP2024-632.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21333 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
#### WHITE et al. v. STATE.

No. 17097.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 16, 1935.

Shropshire & Sanders, of Brady, for appellants.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State. ,. .

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for three years.

In the first count of the indictment the appellants, P. E. White and Fred Cummings; were charged with unlawfully *transporting whislcy.*It is upon that count that the matter was submitted to the jury.

According to the witness Coonrod, a collision of automobiles took place on the public road about midnight. Coonrod, who was driving his car, was injured. According to the state’s witness, the persons who were in the other car refused the request of Coonrod to take him to town on account of his injuries, stating they could not do so because “they were loaded with liquor.” According to the state’s witness Lankford, on the same night the appellants drove their car to a filling station and unloaded from it five kegs full of some kind of liquid which, on the following morning, was found by an officer to be whis-ky. .

Neither of the appellants testified in his own behalf.

From bill of exception No. 1, it appears that the state’s counsel, in' the course of his address to the jury, used the following language: “Gentlemen of the Jury: These defendants were caught red-handed with forty-five gallons of whisky. The State’s evidence shows it. There is no contradiction of the facts.”

Appropriate exception was reserved. From the bill the further quotation is taken: “The court finds as a matter of fact that the transaction complained about by the defendants in this bill of exceptions happened and oc*196curred as is outlined in this bill of exceptions and that said remarks were not caused or provoked by anything said or conduct on the part of the defendants or their attorney; that said remarks were made in the opening argument of the state to the jury.”

We are constrained to regard the remarks of counsel as violative of article 710, O. C..P., in which it is said: “Any defendant in a criminal action shall be permitted to testify in his own behalf therein, but the failure of any defendant to so testify shall not be taken as a circumstance against him, nor shall the same be alluded to or commented on by counsel in the cause.”

The remarks mentioned cannot be characterized other than as a comment upon the failure of the accused to testify. Precedents to the effect that a violation of the statutory provisions would, under the circumstances detailed in the record, require a reversal of the conviction are pointed and numerous. See Vernon’s Ann. Tex. C. C. P. 1925, vol. 2, p. 723, and notes. See, also, Flores v. State, 60 Tex. Cr. R. 25, 129 S. W. 1111.

Other questions are presented in the record, but they are not such as will probably appear upon another trial.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2422 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2422

   To require a study on the health impacts of air traffic noise and 
                               pollution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2018

Ms. Warren (for herself and Mr. Markey) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require a study on the health impacts of air traffic noise and 
                               pollution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HEALTH IMPACTS OF AIR TRAFFIC NOISE AND POLLUTION.

    (a) Study.--The Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
Administration shall enter into appropriate arrangements with the 
Health and Medicine Division of the National Academies of Sciences, 
Engineering, and Medicine under which the Division will--
            (1) not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment 
        of this Act, convene a committee of experts in health and 
        environmental science to examine the various health impacts of 
        air traffic noise and pollution; and
            (2) issue a corresponding expert consensus report that sets 
        forth current scientific knowledge relating to the various 
        health impacts of air traffic noise and pollution.
    (b) Report.--Upon completion of the report required by subsection 
(a)(2), the Division shall transmit the report to the Administrator, 
the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on 
Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76112]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21021]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP22-17-000]


Rio Grande LNG, LLC; Notice of Effectiveness of Withdrawal of 
Application To Amend Section 3 Authorization

    On November 17, 2021, Rio Grande LNG, LLC filed an application 
pursuant to section 3 of the Natural Gas Act \1\ and Part 153 of the 
Commission's regulations \2\ to amend its authorization for the Rio 
Grande Liquified Natural Gas Terminal to incorporate a carbon capture 
and sequestration system. On August 20, 2024, Rio Grande LNG, LLC filed 
a notice of withdrawal of its application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 717b.
    \2\ 18 CFR 153 (2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    No motion in opposition to the notice of withdrawal has been filed, 
and the Commission has taken no action to disallow the withdrawal. 
Pursuant to Rule 216(b) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure,\3\ the withdrawal of the application became effective on 
September 4, 2024, and this proceeding is hereby terminated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 18 CFR 385.216(b) (2023).

    Dated: September 10, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-21021 Filed 9-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P