alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022293EN.01000901.xml

| 1.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/9

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10824 – BAIN CAPITAL / HOUSE OF HR)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 293/08)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Bain Capital Investors, L.L.C. (‘Bain Capital’, United States), |
| --- | --- |

—

Bain Capital Investors, L.L.C. (‘Bain Capital’, United States),

| — | House of HR NV (‘House of HR’, Belgium). |
| --- | --- |

—

House of HR NV (‘House of HR’, Belgium).

Bain Capital will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of House of HR.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Bain Capital: private equity investment firm that invests in companies across Europe, the Americas and the Asia-Pacific region in a number of industries, including information technology, healthcare, retail and consumer products, communications, financial services and industrial/manufacturing, |
| --- | --- |

—

Bain Capital: private equity investment firm that invests in companies across Europe, the Americas and the Asia-Pacific region in a number of industries, including information technology, healthcare, retail and consumer products, communications, financial services and industrial/manufacturing,

| — | House of HR: provides human resources solutions and services to its customers which are active across a variety of sectors in Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland and Spain. |
| --- | --- |

—

House of HR: provides human resources solutions and services to its customers which are active across a variety of sectors in Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland and Spain.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10824 – BAIN CAPITAL / HOUSE OF HR

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

| Postal address: |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT RASHAUN KELLY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-356 ) KELLY SERVICES, INC., ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed November 2, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Larry Helms, Judge. Rashaun Kelly, pro se Appellant. Cherie L. Silberman of Constangy, Brooks, Smith, & Prophete, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
MORRIS, BADALAMENTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
#### ADAMS v. STATE.

No. 20189.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 1, 1939.

D. E. O’Fiel and W. R. Blain, both of Beaumont, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for three years.

This appeal is taken from an order of the District Court setting aside a prior order suspending sentence against the appellant and the entry of judgment final sentencing him to the penitentiary for a term of three years.

At a trial had on October 22, 1935, appellant waived a jury and entered a plea of guilty before the court. At the same time he filed an application for a suspended sentence. The trial was had on the same date and appellant’s punishment was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for three years, with sentence suspended. On the 21st of June, 1938, appellant was again brought before' the court and the order suspending the sentence which had theretofore been entered was set aside and sentence pronounced condemning him to confinement in the penitentiary for a term of three years. The trial court based his action on the fact that in cause No. 12,932 on the docket o-f the trial court appellant had, on the 21st day of June, 1938, been convicted of driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated. However, it appears that from this judgment appellant gave notice of appeal in due form and brought the case upon appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals, where such appeal is now pending. 127 S.W.2d 201.'

■ Appellant’s contention that the judgment and sentence in the (case last mentioned was not such final conviction as would authorize or warrant the trial court to revoke the prior suspension of the sentence in the case at bar must be sustained. A similar situation was presented in the case of Williams v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 83, 53 S.W.2d 628, in which we held that a conviction, pending an appeal therefrom, is not a “final conviction” authorizing the revocation of suspension of sentence in another case against the accused.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

.The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<PAGE>



To Homestead Village Incorporated:


We  are  aware  that  Homestead   Village   Incorporated  and  subsidiaries  has
incorporated by reference in its previously  filed  Registration  Statement File
No. 333-37803, Registration Statement File No. 333-67039, Registration Statement
File No. 333-17243,  Registration Statement File No. 333-17245, and Registration
Statement  File No.  333-48163,  its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended March 31,
1999,  which  includes  our report dated April 23, 1999  covering the  unaudited
interim financial information contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"),  that report is not considered a part of the
Registration Statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or
certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                                     ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
April 23, 1999
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-24-00301-CV

JK HOSPITALITY LLC; Shiva Management, Inc.; Manishbhai Bhakta; Aum Unity Lodging, 

Inc.; and Sai Unity Lodging, Inc.,

Appellants

v.

Jignasa PATEL,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Frio County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-05-00195CVF

Honorable Jennifer Dillingham, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of 

court for this appeal are taxed against Appellants.

SIGNED May 8, 2024.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
,^•L.^•^^• | 

01 October 2010 

Ms. Aloha Ley 

Associate Director 

Small Community Air Service Development Program 

Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis, X86-310 

1200 New Jersey Averiue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re. DOT-OST-2010-0124 

Ms. Ley: 

Allegiant Air is a low-cost air carrier offering non-stop flights from approximately 65 small communities 

throughout the United States to major leisure destinations (ike: Las Vegas (LAS), Phoenix (AZA), Orlando 

(MCO & SFB), Tampa (PIE), Fort Lauderdale (FLL), and Los Angeles (LAX & LGB). 

We constantly evaluate new additions to our network, both smaller community and destination airports. 

We have been evaluating the Northeast Florida Regional Airport (SGJ) at St. Augustine for some time. The 

Airport and surrounding region appear to have potential as a new Allegiant Air destination city. 

The Airport has recently made an application for a Small Community Air Service Development Grant. The 

Airport's application is for marketing and promotional funding. 

The ability of an Airport and community to provide marketing and promotional funding is an important factor 

in Allegiant's consideration of new market opportunities. 

Allegiant Air urges the Department to give favorable consideration to the Airport's grant application. 

Sincerely, 

Brian Davis 

Director of Airport Planning & Charters 

ejOO S Dui.intjo Dli,B 

L.1-, /eq.i'., Novjdj d'.'l 11 

p 702 8^.1 7100 

t 701 HS1 7301 Travel is ou r deal.
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Richard P. Thompson, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AradigmCorporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     /s/ RICHARD P. THOMPSON    Richard P. Thompson  *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*   Dated: November 11, 2003
# C_2022440EN.01000101.xml

| 21.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 440/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 440/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10640 – SAFRAN / MBDA / COMPAGNIE INDUSTRIELLE DES LASERS CILAS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 440/01)

On 14 October 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10640. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10640. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21301]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 3, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 288 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-606, CP2024-614.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21301 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY NINETOWNS DIGITAL WORLD TRADE HOLDINGS
LIMITED. THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN REDACTED. REDACTED MATERIAL IS MARKED WITH "*"
AND HAD BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT

                          OF THE DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT

      CONCERNING THE DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT OF "iDECLARE.CIQ" ENTERPRISE
SOFTWARE MADE BY BEIJING NINETOWNS PORTS SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. WITH
ITS DISTRIBUTOR, SINCE THE CONTENTS OF PART OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE ORIGINAL
DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT DID NOT CORRESPOND TO THE ORIGINAL INTENTION, THIS
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS HEREBY MADE IN ORDER TO SPECIFY THE ORIGINAL INTENTION
OF THE DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT.

PARTY A:  BEIJING NINETOWNS PORTS SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

ADDRESS:  5TH FLOOR, UNION PLAZA, 20 CHAOWAI STREET, CHAOYANG DISTRICT, BEIJING
          100020, THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

ZIP CODE: 100020                             TELEPHONE:        010-65887788

PARTY B:  SHANGHAI TOMORROW TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.

ADDRESS:  26TH FLOOR, HUA XIA BANK TOWER, NO. 256 SOUTH PU DONG ROAD, SHANGHAI
          MUNICIPALITY

ZIP CODE:                                    TELEPHONE:

1.    PRODUCT SETTLEMENT PRICE

      THE SPECIFIC SETTLEMENT PRICE IS AS FOLLOWS:

THE FIXED SELLING PRICE OF PARTY A'S PRODUCTS (INCLUDING SOFTWARE ONLY) TO PARTY
B IS *********, WHICH DOES NOT INCLUDE THE SOFTWARE FEE AND SERVICE FEE AS
DESCRIBED IN THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT.

THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TAKES EFFECT AFTER BEING SIGNED AND SEALED BY BOTH
PARTIES.

PARTY A:  BEIJING NINETOWNS PORTS SOFTWARE    PARTY B: SHANGHAI TOMORROW
          AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.                     TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
                                                       CO., LTD.

          [SEAL]                                       [SEAL]

PARTY A'S REPRESENTATIVE (SEAL):              PARTY B'S REPRESENTATIVE (SEAL):

DATE: APRIL 22, 2004                          DATE: APRIL 22, 2004

                                       1
The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District 1

of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-3698

___________

Matthew Joseph Sikora, Jr., *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska

Robert Houston, Warden, Lincoln *

Correctional Center; John Does, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: June 15, 1998

 Filed: June 25, 1998 

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Matthew J. Sikora, Jr., appeals from a final order of the United States District

Court for the District of Nebraska dismissing Sikora&s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. For 1

the reasons discussed below, we affirm.

Sikora brought this action against prison personnel at the Lincoln Correctional

Center, claiming they violated his constitutional rights by their use of “electro static-
-2-

magnetic pressure field devices” that surround his body in pressure fields of varying

degrees and frequencies. He alleged that their sole purpose was the destruction of his

“mind, confidence, and spirit,” and that the pressure fields caused him to suffer various

physical problems. Following an initial dismissal, appeal, and remand from this court,

see Sikora v. Houston, No. 96-1368, 1996 WL 185734, at *1 (8th Cir. Apr. 19, 1996)

(unpublished per curiam), defendants moved to dismiss the action for failure to state

a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).

Sikora responded with a motion for summary judgment, arguing that defendants

did not date the certificate of service in their motion to dismiss, that the motion was

untimely, and that defendants continued to stalk him using their “directional digital

satellite cyber technology.” Concluding the complaint was delusional and therefore

frivolous, the district court dismissed the complaint with prejudice, and denied as moot

the summary judgment motion.

We conclude the complaint was subject to dismissal with prejudice. Defendants&

failure to include a date on the certificate of service is not a bar to a properly filed

motion, as neither the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure nor the district court&s local

rules require a date. Contrary to Sikora&s contention, the motion to dismiss was timely

filed. Finally, we conclude it appears beyond doubt that Sikora can prove no set of

facts which would entitle him to relief. See Coleman v. Watt, 40 F.3d 255, 258 (8th

Cir. 1994) (standard for dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 10.01

AMENDMENT  TO THE  WELLPOINT 401(k) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN

The WellPoint 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (the "Plan"), as amended through January 1, 2001, is hereby further amended, effective as of April 30,
2002.

1.    A
new Section 3.17 providing for prior service credit for employees of RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc. and HealthLink, Inc. is added at the end of
Article III.



2.    A
new Section 3.18 providing for prior service credit for employees of Texas Managed Care Administrative Services, Inc. is added at the end of
Article III.



3.    Section 5.01
governing Salary Deferral Contributions is amended, effective as of January 1, 2002, to increase the maximum contribution per payroll period to
20% from 15% and, effective as of May 1, 2002, to decrease the minimum contribution per payroll period to 1% from 2%.

4.    Appendix VII:
Participating Companies is amended to reflect the authorization of RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc. as a Participating Company effective as of
May 1, 2002 and to reflect the authorization of HealthLink, Inc. as a Participating Company effective as of May 6, 2002.

5.    A
new Appendix XII:Special Provisions Applicable to RightCHOICE Employeesis added at the end of the Plan
effective as of May 1, 2002.

APPENDIX XII: SPECIAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO RIGHTCHOICE EMPLOYEES



---



2

---



6.    A
new Appendix XIII:Special Provision Applicable to HealthLink Employeesis added at the end of the Plan effective
as of May 6, 2002.

APPENDIX XIII: SPECIAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO HEALTHLINK EMPLOYEES



3

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, WellPoint Health Networks Inc. has cause this Amendment to be executed this 30th day of April, 2002.

| |  | WELLPOINT HEALTH NETWORKS INC.
| |  | ------------------------------
| |  | By:                           

4

---

QuickLinks
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 7, 2018

s0228 

# Order

Clerk March 7, 2018

155764

CEDRIC CARTER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 155764

COA: 330573

Ingham CC: 14

- 001008

- CZ

CAPITAL AREA TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 4, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

 

I, Javier O. Lamoso, the president of ClearComm, L.P., certify that (i) theMarch 31, 2004 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the March 31, 2004 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of ClearComm, L.P.

 

 
|   | /s/ Javier  O. Lamoso |   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|
|   | Javier O.  Lamoso     |
|   | President             |
|   | May 24, 2004          |

 

 

----