alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT  32(A)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I,  Dennis  Sunshine, Chief Executive Officer of Orbit International Corp.,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as enacted by  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     the  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,
2004  (the "Annual Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with
the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934;  and

     (2)     information  contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations of Orbit
International  Corp.

Dated:  March  31,  2005
                                   /s/  Dennis  Sunshine
                                   ---------------------
                                   Dennis  Sunshine
                                   Chief  Executive  Officer

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Orbit International Corp. and will
be  retained  by  Orbit  International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21049]



[[Page 76192]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will be held via teleconference 
through the Microsoft Teams Platform.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, October 24, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 
214-413-6550.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Thursday, October 24, 2024, at 3 p.m. eastern time via 
teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. For more information, please 
contact Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6550, or write 
TAP Office, 1114 Commerce St. MC 1005, Dallas, TX 75242 or contact us 
at the website: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include the potential project referrals from the 
committees, and discussions on priorities the TAP will focus on for the 
2024 year. Public input is welcomed.

    Dated: September 9, 2024.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2024-21049 Filed 9-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2638

EDGAR MICHAEL PORTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NATIONAL CON-SERV, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-96-4005-JFM)

Submitted: January 26, 1999 Decided: February 17, 1999

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edgar Michael Porter, Appellant Pro Se. John Marshall, MOLDAWER &

MARSHALL, Rockville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Edgar Porter appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Appellee and dismissing Porter’s complaint

brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.

§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Porter v. National Con-Serv, Inc., No. CA-96-4005-JFM

(D. Md. Oct. 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
#### PLEASANT v. STATE.

No. 18722.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 20, 1937.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 10, 1937.

R. G. Robertson, of Port Arthur, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault; penalty assessed at a fine'of $50.

Upon an indictment charging an assault with intent to murder; the appellant was convicted of an aggravated assault.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The'judgment is affirmed.
TiLiJlNCOURTOFW^EALS

!2thCourtofA£Ee3llDistricl

TYCEH TEXAS

CATHY 3. LUSK, CLl*

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

«?^

t

FILE COPY

8/19/2015 COA No. 12-14-00053-CR

EVANS, FRANK ANTHONY JR. Tr. Ct. No. 007-1297-13 PD-0849-15

On this day, this Court has granted the Appellant's Pro Se Motion to Suspend Rule

9.3(b) T.R.A.P.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CATHY LUSK

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
1 ... S eeTe x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO . 2- 08- 172- CR J OHN T HOMAS CR AW F OR D AP P E L L ANT V . TH E STA TE O F TEXA S STA TE

----- ----- -- FR O M THE 297TH DI STRI CT CO URT O F TARRA NT CO UN TY

----- ----- -- 

### MEMORANDU M OPI NI ON 1

----- ----- -- A ppe l l antJoh n Thom asCr aw f or d pl ea ded gui l t y t o pos se ss i on ofone gr am or m or e butl ess t han f ourgr am s ofm et ham phetam i ne. A j ur y asses sed pun i shm entofseven year s’ conf i nem ent , and t he t r i al courtsent e n c ed A ppe l l antac cor di ngl y.2 ... 3 8 6 U .S . 7 3 8 , 8 7 S . C t. 1 3 9 6 (1 9 6 7 ). 2 A p p e l l a n t’ s c o u rt -ap p o i n ted ap p e l la te c o u n se l h a s fi l e d a m o ti o n to w i t hdr aw asco uns el an d a br i efi n s upportoft hatm ot i on. Couns el ’ s br i efan d m o ti o n m e e t t h e req u i rem e n ts o f A n der sv. Ca lif

o r n ia 2b y pr es ent i ng a p r o f e s s io n a l e v a lu a t io n o f t h e r e c o r d d e m o n s t r a t in g w h yt h e r e a r e n o a r g u a b le g rou n d s fo r r e l i e f. A p p e l l a n t w a s g i v e n the o p p o rt u n i ty to fi l e a p ro s e b ri e f, buthe di d notdo s o. A s t he r evi ew i ng c ourt , w e m us tco nduc tan i nde pen den tev al uat i on of t he r ec or d t o de t er m i ne w het herco unsel i s cor r ec ti n de t er m i ni ng t hatt he a p p e a l i s fri v o l o u s . S e eS taffo rd v. S tate , 8 1 3 S . W . 2 d 5 0 3 , 5 1 1 ( T e x . C r i m. A p p . 1 9 9 1 ); Ma ys v. S tate , 90 4 S. W . 2d 92 0, 92 3 ( Tex . A pp. — Fort W o rt h 1 9 9 5 , n o p e t.). O n l yth e n m a yw e g ra n t c o u n s e l ’s m o ti o n to w i th d ra w . S ee Pen s o nv. O h io , 48 8 U . S . 75 , 82 –8 3, 10 9 S . C t . 34 6, 35 1 ( 19 88 ) . Because A ppel l antent er ed an open pl ea ofg ui l t y, ouri ndep enden tr evi ew f orpot ent i al er r ori s l i m i t ed t o pot ent i al j ur i sd i ct i ona l de f ec t s, the vol unt ar i nes s of A ppe l l ant ’ s pl ea , er r ort hati s noti nde pen den tofan d s upport s t he j udgm entof g u i l t, a n d e rro r o c c u rri n g a fte r e n tryo f th e g u i l typ l e a . S e eMo n rea l v. S tate , 9 9 S .W .3 d 6 1 5 , 6 2 0 (T e x . C ri m . A p p . 2 0 0 3 ); Yo ungv. S tate , 8 S. W . 3d 656, 6 6 6

– 6 7 (T e x . C ri m . A p p . 2 0 0 0 ).3

W e have car ef ul l y r evi ew ed t he r ecor d and cou nsel ’ s br i ef . W e agr ee w i t h c ouns el t hatt hi s app ea l i s w hol l y f r i vol ous an d w i t houtm er i t . W e f i nd n o th i n g in t h e re c o rd t h a t m i g h t a rg u a b l ys u p p o rt t h e a p p e a l . See Bl eds oe v. S tate, 1 7 8 S . W . 3 d 8 2 4 , 8 2 7

– 2 8 ( T ex . C r i m . A pp . 2 0 0 5 ) ; ac co rd Meza v. S ta te, 206 S. W . 3d 684 , 685 n. 6 ( Tex. Cr i m . A pp. 2006 ) . W e t her ef or e g r ant c o u n se l ’s m o ti o n to w i th d raw an d affi rm the tr i a l co u rt ’s j u d g m e n t.

P E R CU R I AM PA N EL: G A RD N ER, J. ; CA YC E, C. J. ; an d L I V I N G STO N , J. DO NO T P UBLI SH Tex. R. A pp. P. 47. 2( b) DEL I VERE D: Apr i l 30, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Valcom, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for  the  quarter  ended  June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Steven  Cantrock,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement  required  by  Section 906 has been
provided to Valcom, Inc. and will be retained by Valcom, Inc.  and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

August 21, 2006


/s/ Steven Cantrock
---------------------------
Steven Cantrock
Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
#### BARRETT v. TATUM et al.

No. 9370.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Nov. 22, 1933.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 20, 1933.

Barrett & Taylor, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Leonard Brown, of San Antonio, for appel-lees.

MURRAY, Justice.

This is a petition for injunction instituted by Thurman Barrett, as a resident and taxpayer of Harlandale independent school district, seeking to enjoin one Ed. Drennon and one J. A. West from acting as trustees of said school district.

Petitioner contends that the pretended election of Drennon and West was illegal and void, for the reason that there were only three members of the school board present at the time of their election, and that three members did not constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.

The court below refused the injunction and Thurman Barrett, appellant herein, has brought this appeal.

The trial court properly refused to grant this injunction.1 The prime object of this suit is to test the right of Drennon and West to act as school trustees. The proper way to test the legality of their appointment or election to these offices is by quo warranto brought in the name of the state. 51 C. J. p. 313; Aulanier v. Governor, 1 Tex. 653; Grant v. Chambers, 31 Tex. 574; article 6253, R. S. 1925.

It is clear from the facts pleaded by petitioner that Drennon and West were at least de facto trustees and the regularity of their election could not be questioned in a collateral proceeding. Boesch v. Byrom, 37 Tex. Civ. App. 35, 83 S. W. 18; Walker v. Walter (Tex. Civ. App.) 241 S. W. 524.

In view of the provisions of article 2656, R. S., appellant should have first presented this controversy to* the county superintendent, then to the state superintendent of public instruction, and, if not satisfied with his decision, then to the state board of education before resorting to the courts. South San Antonio Ind. School Dist. v. Martine (Tex. Civ. App.) 275 S. W. 265, writ of error denied 115 Tex. 145, 277 S. W. 78; Warren et al. v. Sanger Ind. School Dist., 116 Tex. 183, 288 S. W. 159; Bevers v. Winfrey (Tex. Civ. App.) 260 S. W. 627.

The judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022305EN.01000901.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/9 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10861 – HG / TEAM.BLUE)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 305/05)

1.

On 3 August 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022305EN.01000901-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | HGCapital LLP (‘Hg’, United Kingdom), through its subsidiary, Hg Pooled Management Limited (United Kingdom), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | team.blue Topco SARL (‘team.blue’, Luxembourg), currently jointly controlled by Hg and a private investor, Jonas Dhaenens. |

Hg will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of team.blue.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Hg is a software and services investor that manages investment funds mainly in Europe and North America; |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | team.blue offers a variety of digital presence and enablement tools, such as website infrastructure and web hosting services, mainly in Europe. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022305EN.01000901-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10861 – HG / TEAM.BLUE

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022305EN.01000901-E0001)  
[OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022305EN.01000901-E0002)  
[OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

GORDON ARTHUR WOODLE Y AND DENISE LYNN WOODLEY, Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v.

DANIEL HAGGART AND KATHY HAGGART, FOR THEMSELVES AND AS REPRESENTATIVES OF A CLASS OF SIMILARLY S ITUATED PERSONS, Plaintiffs

- Appellees

,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

.

______________________

2014

- 5106

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:09

- cv

- 00103

- CFL, Judge Charles F. Lettow.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________ Case: 14-5106 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 09/25/2014WOODLEY v. US 2

P ER C URIAM

. O R D E R
Daniel Haggart et al. (“Class Members”) move to strike certain pages from a ppellants’ appendix. Appe llants oppose. Class M embers also move to dismiss a ppe llants’ appeal as frivolous and for summary affirmance. Appellants and the United States oppose.

The court deems it the better course fo r the Class Members to raise their arguments for affirmance and their arguments to strike in their response brief

. Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion to strike is d enied. The parties are directed to address whether the documents are proper ly before the court in their briefs.
(2) The motion to dismiss or for summary affir manc e is denied. The appellees ’ response brief s are due within
4 0 days of the date of filing of this order.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s24 Case: 14-5106 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 09/25/2014
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shelby T. Brewer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc.







/s/ Shelby T. Brewer

DATE:  November 19, 2008

Dr. Shelby T. Brewer, Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Commodore Applied Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.













1
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000739 30-JUN-2014 08:19 AM
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS   SCHEDULE   CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION
EXTRACTED  FROM  THE  UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT  OF
EARNINGS  AND UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET  FOR  THE
PERIOD  ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 FILED WITH THE  SECURITIES
AND  EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED  IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.   IN
ACCORDANCE WITH STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING  STANDARDS
NO.  128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE," BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE AND
DILUTED  EARNINGS  PER  SHARE  HAVE  BEEN  INCLUDED  IN  THE
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE PRESENTED BELOW IN PLACE OF  PRIMARY
EARNINGS PER SHARE AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE.
</LEGEND>
       
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                2,855
<SECURITIES>                          1,257
<RECEIVABLES>                         1,936
<ALLOWANCES>                             19
<INVENTORY>                           1,645
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      7,867
<PP&E>                                1,347
<DEPRECIATION>                          493
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        9,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1,345
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                 10
<OTHER-SE>                           21,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          9,328
<SALES>                               5,225
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      5,225
<CGS>                                 2,658
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         4,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      1,400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (3.536)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (3,536)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        (3,536)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.39)
                                           
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited financial statements of SIS Bancorp,  Inc. at and for the period ended
June 30, 1998 and is qualified  in its  entirety by reference to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         56,578
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         19,865
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               22,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    566,945
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         233,767
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           234,404
<LOANS>                                        870,145
<ALLOWANCE>                                    23,482
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,841,662
<DEPOSITS>                                     1,326,895
<SHORT-TERM>                                   333,728
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            47,188
<LONG-TERM>                                    2,314
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       71
<OTHER-SE>                                     131,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1,841,662
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                36,029
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              24,107
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               1,091
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               61,227
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             21,569
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             30,591
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          30,636
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  503
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                25,249
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                13,389
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     13,389
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   8,301
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 7.38
<LOANS-NON>                                    3,598
<LOANS-PAST>                                   109
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               433
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                17,658
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               22,724
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  717
<RECOVERIES>                                   972
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              23,482
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           23,482
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        


</TABLE>