alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ACCEPTED 04-15-00333-CR FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 10/23/2015 4:29:05 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK
<PAGE>


                                                               Exhibit 12
                                                               ----------
                          PACIFIC BELL AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (Dollars in millions)

                            -----------------------------------------------
                             1996      1995      1994      1993      1992
                            ------    ------    ------    ------    ------
1. Earnings
   --------
   (a) Income before
       Interest Expense     $1,533    $1,379    $1,510    $ 447     $1,591

   (b) Federal Income
       Taxes                   579       421       462      (68)       458

   (c) State and local 
       Income Taxes            196       148       159       11        149

   (d) 1/3 Operating
       Rental Expense           46        28        40       37         35
                            -------   -------   -------   -------    ------
       Total                $2,354    $1,976    $2,171    $ 427     $2,233

2.  Fixed Charges
    -------------
   (a) Total Interest
       Deductions           $  411    $  410    $  439    $ 429     $  460

   (b) 1/3 Operating
       Rental Expense           46        28        40       37         35
                            -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
       Total                $  457    $  438    $  479    $ 466     $  495

3.  Ratio (1 divided by 2)    5.15      4.51      4.53      .92*      4.51

*  This  figure reflects  the restructuring  and curtailment  charges totaling
   $924 million after taxes taken in the fourth quarter 1993.
SCWC-11-0000463

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

JACK THOMAS,

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

COUNTY OF HAWAI#I; JAY KIMURA; and JEFFERSON R. MALATE;

Respondents/Defendants-Appellees. 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-11-0000463; CIV. NO. 07-1-0128)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant’s application for writ

of certiorari filed on February 1, 2013, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 14, 2013. 

Charles J. Ferrera

for petitioner

Michael J. Udovic

for respondents

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-11-0000463

14-MAR-2013

01:57 PM
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2701 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2701

   To direct the President to impose duties on merchandise from the 
  People's Republic of China in an amount equivalent to the estimated 
    annual loss of revenue to holders of United States intellectual 
property rights as a result of violations of such intellectual property 
                rights in China, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2015

 Mr. King of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the President to impose duties on merchandise from the 
  People's Republic of China in an amount equivalent to the estimated 
    annual loss of revenue to holders of United States intellectual 
property rights as a result of violations of such intellectual property 
                rights in China, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT ON VIOLATIONS OF UNITED STATES INTELLECTUAL 
              PROPERTY RIGHTS IN CHINA.

    (a) Study.--The United States Trade Representative shall conduct an 
annual study to determine the estimated annual loss of revenue to 
holders of United States intellectual property rights as a result of 
violations of such intellectual property rights in the People's 
Republic of China.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the United States Trade 
Representative shall submit to Congress a report that contains the 
results of the study conducted pursuant to subsection (a).

SEC. 2. IMPOSITION OF DUTIES ON MERCHANDISE FROM CHINA AND DISTRIBUTION 
              OF PROCEEDS OF SUCH DUTIES TO HOLDERS OF CERTAIN UNITED 
              STATES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the President, acting 
through the United States Trade Representative, shall--
            (1) impose duties on merchandise from the People's Republic 
        of China in an amount equivalent to the estimated annual loss 
        of revenue to holders of United States intellectual property 
        rights as a result of violations of such intellectual property 
        rights in China, as determined by the Trade Representative 
        pursuant to the study conducted under section 1(a) and 
        contained in the report submitted to Congress under section 
        1(b); and
            (2) provide for the distribution of the proceeds of such 
        duties to holders of United States intellectual property rights 
        described in paragraph (1) on a proportional basis.
                                 <all>
```
Director

Office of International Aviation

US Department of Transportation

400 Seventh Street SW

Room 6402

Washington DC 20590

USA

10th January 2014

Reciprocity Statement

This letter is to confirm that the Civil Aviation Directorate within Transport Malta will 

grant, on the basis of reciprocity, the US air carriers all rights included in the Air 

Transport Agreement between the European Community and its Member States signed on 

the 30th April 2007 and in force since the 30th March 2008.

Yours sincerely,

Ian Falzon

Director General for Civil Aviation
|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |  |
| INDIANA                                        | 35-1544218 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

----

|              |
|--------------|
|              |  |
| Exhibit 99.1 | Press Release dated April 18, 2014 issued by First Merchants Corporation |

----

----

|             |
|-------------|
|             |  |
| Exhibit No. | Description |
| 99.1        | Press Release, dated April 18, 2014 issued by First Merchants Corporation |
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76495]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21186]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4730-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Alaska; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alaska (FEMA-4730-DR), dated August 23, 2023, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on July 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Lance E. Davis, 
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for 
this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Brian F. Schiller as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-21186 Filed 9-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
*OPINION ISSUED FEBRUARY 11, 2009*

#### MONTGOMERY MEDCORP VS. DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS

(CC-08-0311)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Charles P. Houdyschell Jr., Senior Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks payment in the amount of $3,598.00 for medical services that it provided to inmates at Mount Olive Correctional Complex. Respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity of the claim and further states that there were insufficient funds in its appropriation for the fiscal year in question from which to pay the claim.

While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision in *Airkem Sales and Service, et al. v. Dep't. of Mental Health,*8 Ct. Cl. 180 (1971).

Claim disallowed.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1859 

To extend the moratorium on the annual fee on health insurance providers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. COTTON, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. 

PORTMAN, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. 

HELLER, and Mr. SCOTT) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the moratorium on the annual fee on health 

insurance providers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Healthcare Tax Relief 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF MORATORIUM ON ANNUAL FEE ON 

7 HEALTH INSURANCE PROVIDERS. 

8 Subsection (j)(2) of section 9010 of the Patient Pro9 tection and Affordable Care Act is amended by striking 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1859 IS

1 ‘‘December 31, 2017’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

2 2018’’. 

Æ 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1217. JEROME VANALSTYNE v. MONIKE SAPP.

Jerome Vanalstyne filed an application for direct appeal seeking review of,

inter alia, the trial court’s order denying his motion to set aside a final divorce decree.

However, the Georgia Supreme Court has jurisdiction over all divorce and alimony

cases, including those cases ancillary to the divorce proceedings. See Ga. Const.

1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (6); Morris v. Surges, 284 Ga. 748, 750 (2) (670 SE2d

84) (2008); see also Todd v. Todd, 287 Ga. 250 (703 SE2d 597) (2010). Because the

underlying subject matter of this appeal is divorce, it is hereby TRANSFERRED to

the Supreme Court for disposition

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/28/2016

March 28, 2016
Appendix C

Summary of Burden and Cost by Activity and Year

Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems (Subpart W)
Year 1- Year 3

Source Category

No. 

Respondents 

Responses/

Respondent

Total 

Responses

Burden -

Technical

(hrs)

Burden -

Managerial

(hrs)

Total Burden 

(hrs)

Total Labor 

Cost

($)

Capital 

Cost

($)

O&M Cost

($)

Total Cost

($)

Onshore Petroleum and Natural Gas 

Production, Process Emissions 1033 1 1033 68,884 8,579 77,463 $6,316,716 $59,206 $0 $6,375,922

Onshore Petroleum and Natural Gas 

Production, Combustion Emissions 1033 1 1033 12,231 12,231 24,461 $2,283,965 $0 $0 $2,283,965

Offshore Petroleum and Natural Gas 

Production, Process Emissions 72 1 72 1,467 387 1,854 $157,541 $0 $0 $157,541

Offshore Petroleum and Natural Gas 

Production, Combustion Emissions 58 1 58 687 687 1,373 $128,238 $0 $0 $128,238

Onshore Natural Gas Processing, 

Process Emissions 291 1 291 21,525 2,020 23,545 $1,799,230 $232,860 $124,257 $2,156,346

Onshore Natural Gas Processing, 

Combustion Emissions 107 1 107 1,267 1,267 2,534 $236,577 $0 $0 $236,577

Onshore Natural Gas Transmission 

Compression, Process Emissions 1152 1 1152 66,711 2,996 69,707 $5,171,489 $397,539 $1,161,170 $6,730,198

Onshore Natural Gas Transmission 

Compression, Combustion Emissions 349 1 349 4,132 4,132 8,264 $771,640 $0 $0 $771,640

Underground Natural Gas Storage, 

Process Emissions 139 1 139 9,584 1,101 10,685 $815,124 $65,803 $115,189 $996,115

Underground Natural Gas Storage, 

Combustion Emissions 85 1 85 1,006 1,006 2,013 $187,935 $0 $0 $187,935

Natural Gas Distribution, Process 

Emissions 159 1 159 17,862 1,247 19,109 $1,390,860 $23,267 $254,082 $1,668,209

Natural Gas Distribution, Combustion 

Emissions 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0

LNG Import and Export Equipment, 

Process Emissions 4 1 4 331 43 373 $29,496 $2,400 $7,823 $39,718

LNG Import and Export Equipment, 

Combustion Emissions 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0

LNG Storage, Process Emissions 35 1 35 1,965 235 2,200 $172,700 $14,883 $27,434 $215,016

LNG Storage, Combustion Emissions 35 1 35 414 414 829 $77,385 $0 $0 $77,385

TOTAL 2,885 Varies 4,552 208,066 36,344 244,410 $19,538,894 $795,957 $1,689,954 $22,024,805

C-2
#### TRANS-STATE OIL CO. et al. v. STATE et al.

No. 4579.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

Sept. 30, 1933.

*386Saye, Smead & Saye, of .Longview, for appellants. .

James V. Allred, Atty. Gen., and Neal Powers, A. R. Stout, and Willis E. Gresham, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellees.

LEVY, Justice

(after stating the case as ■above). ■

It is believed that the present suit, in form and objective, must be regarded and so considered on this appeal, as quo warranto proceeding, to forfeit the charter of the two oil corporations named as defendants. The proceeding was presented to the trial court, as we must deem it to have been, upon that theory. The proceeding was by the state, on the relation of the Attorney General of the state, praying that upon the particular grounds stated, to have forfeited or vacated the charter of the corporations, and to oust from the franchise to be a corporation, and for the appointment of a receiver of the properties and business of the corporations. The common procedure was followed for the institution of a quo warranto proceeding,. of first- making application for leave of the court to institute it, and the granting of such leave by the court. Article 6253, R. S. And it appears' that the court at once upon the filing of the complaint entered an interlocutory order appointing the receiver, resting the appointment alone upon the allegations in the complaint.1

The statute expressly provides for the appointment of a receiver, namely, subdivision 3 of article 2293: “3. In-cases’where a corporation * * * has been dissolved or has forfeited its corporate .rights.” . .

Article 1375: “In any case wherein the State is suing any such corporation for the forfeiture of its charter, or of its permit to do business in this State, or for fines or penalties, appoint a receiver for such corporation whenever the interest of the State may seem to require such.”

And it may be assumed for the moment, without deciding the question, that the grounds alleged for forfeiture are grounds conferred by statute to decree forfeiture of a charter of a private corporation. The forfeiture of the charter of a private corporation may be predicated upon a violation of any duty cast upon it by positive- law and on violation of a statute: 11 Tex. Jur. *§*462, p. 123. But, as we conclude, in view of the evidence in the record, considered as a whole, the appointment of a receiver for the corporations named may not properly be made, in advance of the final adjudication of forfei-" ture of the charters of the corporations. The penalty invoked represents the extreme rigor of the law, and its infliction must rest upon grave cause and be warranted beyond dispute by material misconduct in willful violation of law or of the corporate grant.

We are not to be understood as holding either that the charges in suit do or do not justify a forfeiture of the charters upon the final adjudication upon the merits.

The order is reversed, and judgment is here rendered vacating the appointment of a receiver, and the cause remanded for trial in regular course.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 275 

To allow the financing by United States persons of sales of agricultural 

commodities to Cuba. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2017 

Ms. HEITKAMP (for herself, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. UDALL, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. 

DURBIN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. KING, Ms. COLLINS, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. 

DONNELLY, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. WARNER, and Mr. COCHRAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To allow the financing by United States persons of sales 

of agricultural commodities to Cuba. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Agricultural Export 

5 Expansion Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINANCING OF SALES OF AGRICULTURAL COMMOD7 ITIES TO CUBA. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi9 sion of law (other than section 908 of the Trade Sanctions 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 275 IS

1 Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 

2 7207), as amended by subsection (c)), a person subject 

3 to the jurisdiction of the United States may provide pay4 ment or financing terms for sales of agricultural commod5 ities to Cuba or an individual or entity in Cuba. 

6 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

7 (1) AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY.—The term 

8 ‘‘agricultural commodity’’ has the meaning given 

9 that term in section 102 of the Agricultural Trade 

10 Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 5602). 

11 (2) FINANCING.—The term ‘‘financing’’ in12 cludes any loan or extension of credit. 

13 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 908 of the 

14 Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 

15 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7207) is amended— 

16 (1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘AND

17 FINANCING’’; 

18 (2) by striking subsection (b); 

19 (3) in subsection (a)— 

20 (A) by striking ‘‘PROHIBITION’’ and all 

21 that follows through ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not22 withstanding’’ and inserting ‘‘IN GENERAL.— 

23 Notwithstanding’’; and 

24 (B) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and 

25 (3) as subsections (b) and (c), respectively, and 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 275 IS

1 by moving those subsections, as so redesig2 nated, 2 ems to the left; and 

3 (4) by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)’’ each place it 

4 appears and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Order filed, June 6, 2022

.

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

____________ NO. 01

- 22

- 00377

- CV

THE CITY OF HOUSTON , Appellant

V.

NIKOLETTE LEDESMA AND ELSA ESTRADA , Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case 2017

- 84026



### ORDER The reporter’s record in this case was due May 27, 2022

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Julia Rivera , the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record in this appeal , if any, wi thin 10 days of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 23.2



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT APPRAISER



American Appraisal Associates, Inc. (AAA) hereby consents to the incorporation by reference of the summary of
its conclusions of value in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Paradyne Networks, Inc. (Paradyne) for the period ending December 31, 2004. Specifically, AAA consents to disclosure of AAA as its valuation expert and AAAs opinions of
value of purchased customer relationships and developed technology that were performed by AAA in connection with the acquisition of the assets of Net to Net Technologies, Inc. and the capital stock of Elastic Networks, Inc. and to the incorporation
by reference of such summary in the Registration Statement on From S-8 (No. 333-67690), S-8 (No. 333-59580), S-8 (No. 333-57310), S-8 (No. 333-45396), S-8 (No. 333-83073), S-8 (No. 333-90732), S-8 (No. 333-106121), S-8 (No. 333-117947), S-3 (No.
333-112030) and S-3 (No. 333-118698). In giving this consent AAA does not hereby admit that it comes within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or as an expert as defined by
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. 694015



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/    Dale J. Egan                
|Dale J. Egan                       
|General Counsel                    
|American Appraisal Associates, Inc.
|Milwaukee, Wisconsin               
|March 15, 2005