alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(4910-I3-PI

SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) for the products liste .0 , SVIol (DOT). AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

BAe 146-100A and -200A Airplanes
ACTION: Final rule. Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 n 

## 7/v,/ (':> [Docket No. FAA-2010-0434; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-22 I-AD; Amendment ROUTINGSV"lIOl 

## i

# "'~0 I(P - 

## if) ,4iJ/I.( - 

## i('f39-*~ AD 2010ALU] 

# '''/:j.Jhlfl<:lrRlN 2120-AA64 

# "12-7/to Ainvorthiness Directives; BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Model 

## ~41'2.S\.MBOl (

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority ofanother country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl deLribes the unsafe condition as: eoUTINr.~"MIIOL INI'I·IAI.£..

I;H; The operation ofthe airbrake lever inthe "airbrakes out" to "lift spoiler" range has been the subject oftwo occurr~nce reports. The lift spoilers on the BAe 146and Avro 146-RJ aeroplanes have been designed to deploy on landing to provide aerodynamic braking and to dump lift to ensure that the wheel brakes can provide the necessary speed reduction . I)ME ~l/1'OO::S\""llOl


# • • • • • • • The effects ofdeceleration and landing inertia loads can cause uncommanded movement ofthe airbrake selector lever from the "lift spoiler" position tothe "airbrakes out" position, causing the lift spoilers to retract during the landing roll. This condition, ifnot corrected, would increase the landing distance, possibly rer'ulting in arunway overrun and consequent injury to aeroplane occupants. OAT".
# C_2022386EN.01000801.xml

| 7.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 386/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 386/8

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10646 – Microsoft / Activision Blizzard)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 386/06)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Microsoft Corporation (‘Microsoft’, US), |
| --- | --- |

—

Microsoft Corporation (‘Microsoft’, US),

| — | Activision Blizzard, Inc. (‘Activision Blizzard’, US). |
| --- | --- |

—

Activision Blizzard, Inc. (‘Activision Blizzard’, US).

Microsoft will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Activision Blizzard.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for Microsoft: a global technology company offering a wide range of products and services to customers through the following operating segments: Productivity and Business Processes; Intelligent Cloud; and More Personal Computing. Through its Gaming Business, Microsoft is active as a developer and publisher of games for personal computers (‘PCs’), game consoles and mobile devices and is active as a distributor of games for PCs and consoles. Further, Microsoft offers the Xbox gaming console and related services; |
| --- | --- |

—

for Microsoft: a global technology company offering a wide range of products and services to customers through the following operating segments: Productivity and Business Processes; Intelligent Cloud; and More Personal Computing. Through its Gaming Business, Microsoft is active as a developer and publisher of games for personal computers (‘PCs’), game consoles and mobile devices and is active as a distributor of games for PCs and consoles. Further, Microsoft offers the Xbox gaming console and related services;

| — | for Activision Blizzard: a developer and publisher of games for PCs, game consoles and mobile devices and a distributor of games for PCs. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Activision Blizzard: a developer and publisher of games for PCs, game consoles and mobile devices and a distributor of games for PCs.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10646 – Microsoft / Activision Blizzard

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
#### HAYS v. STATE.

No. 18056.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 18, 1936.

Carney & Carney, of Atlanta, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge. ■

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of unlawfully possessing spirituous liquor for the purpose of sale; and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of one year.

Pending the appeal of this case, the law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended) under which this conviction was had has been repealed. See Acts of the 44th Legislature, 2d Called Session, section 49, article l, c. 467, Liquor Control Act (Vernon’s Ann. P.C. art. 666 — 49); and the rule announced by this court in the case of Guy Meadows v. State, 88 S.W.(2d) 481.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the trial court be and the same is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION

7 Mr. Rick Brunetti Director, Bureau of Air
11201 Renner Boulevard Lenexa, Kansas 66219 

# OCT 2 2 2015 Kansas Department

of Health and Environment 1000 SW Jackson, Suite 310 Topeka, Kansas 66612 Dear Mr. Brunetti: Thank you for the recommendations regarding the attainment status selected areas in Kansas under the 2010 sulfur dioxide national ambient air quality standard that your agency sent us on September
17, 2015. As you know, we are subject
to a March
2, 2015, court order directing
us to promulgate S02 designations

for these areas under section 107 of the Clean Air Act by July 2, 2016. Specifically,

we are required

to promulgate designations

for these areas because they contain sources meeting the S02 emissions criteria identified

in the consent decree. The information you provided
on September
17, 2015, will greatly help us meet this duty and ensure protection

of public health in Kansas. In addition

to the information you have provided, we have recently received modeling and related information from the Sierra Club that is relevant

to a subset of the areas to be addressed
by July 2, 2016. In your state, we have received information pertinent

to the area near the BPU Nearman facility. We have already provided this information

to your staff. Please let us know
if you have any questions about the information
we have received
or if you need any additional information. I am writing

to solicit your review of the information that Sierra Club has provided,

so that the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency can base its designations decisions
on the best available information. The Clean Air Act provides for designations

to be developed through

a partnership

of state agencies and the EPA; however, we also believe

it is important

to consider significant and relevant information that members
of the public provide

to us. Consistent with the structure
of the Clean Air Act, we believe that the best first step in addressing this information would be for your agency
to provide its review of this information. Since the Sierra Club's recommendation differs from your recommendation,

we would welcome your commentary generally
on the information

as well as your detailed review of the elements of Sierra Club's analysis. To the extent practicable,
we would appreciate quantitative comparisons

of data used in Sierra Club's analysis compared

to the data used in your analysis,

to help us evaluate the elements
of the two analyses.

*Printed

on Recycled PaperWewouldappreciateyourreviewofSierraClub'sinformationbyNovember17,2015.Yourtimelyreviewwouldprovideusvaluableassistanceinourreviewofyourdesignationrecommendationsanddevelopmentofourintendeddesignations,whichweareaimingtocompletebytheendofJanuary2016.Wewillthenpublishnoticeofourintendeddesignationsforpubliccomment,and,asrequiredbytheCleanAirAct,promulgatefinaldesignations110soonerthan120daysaftergivingyounoticeofthem.PleasecontactDavidPeterofmystaffat(9f3)1-7397oratpeter.david@epa.govifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthisrequest.Sincerely,BeckyWeberDirectorAirandWasteManagementDivision
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-3 No. 33-1198, No. 33-13353 and No. 33-12485) and in the related
Prospectuses and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-80343)
pertaining to the 1995 Incentive Plan, 1995 Nonemployee Director Stock Plan,
1994 Stock Compensation Plan and Misc. Non-Qualified Stock Options of WavePhore,
Inc. of our report dated February 14, 1997, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of WavePhore, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                                              ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 6, 1997
#### MERRICK v. STREET.

No. 13305.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

June 7, 1935.

W. E. Fitzgerald, of Wichita Falls, for appellant.

Bernard Martin and Brannon & Tipps, all of Wichita Falls, for appellee.

LATTIMORE, Justice.

The record was tendered this court on May 29, 1935. The transcript says that the cause came on to be heard on the 20th day of March, 1935. The judgment does not recite specifically any date of rendition, of that judgment, but the transcript of same is indorsed, “Filed March 30, 1935.” Appellant, by affidavit, alleges that the judgment was in fact pronounced by the court on March 20, 1935, but that the court requested counsel to prepare a draft of the same for the minutes and that such draft, approved by the trial judge, was not delivered to the clerk for record in the minutes of that court until March 30, 1935, and that in fact same was not actually recorded in the minutes until April 5, 1935.

It is not necessary for us to pass upon the question of whether the date of actual recording of the judgment in the minutes may be proven to us by affidavit.

The record itself, in stating that the judgment was “filed” on March 30, 1935, is susceptible of interpretation that the precept of judgment rendered by the court was delivered to the clerk on March 30, 1935, for the purpose of having the clerk record the same in the minutes. No motion for new trial was filed, and it is certain that the date which fixes the beginning of a period within which appellant may take his appeal is the date that the judgment is in fact spread upon the minutes. Slayden & Co. v. Palmo (Tex. Civ. App.) 90 S. W. 908; Trotti v. Kinnear (Tex. Civ. App.) 144 S. W. 326; Partridge v. Wooton, 63 Tex. Civ. App. 280, 137 S. W. 412.

Article 1839, Rev. St., as amended in 1933 (Acts 1933, c. 67 [Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 1839]), provides that appellant shall file a transcript within 60 days from the final judgment or order overruling the motion for new trial, and thus,* by analogy, those cases are authority for allowing the filing of the transcript and statement of facts within 60 days from the date which the transcript shows the judgment was spread upon the minutes.

For good cause shown, this court may allow the transcript and. statement *519of facts to be filed even though tendered 69 days after the date of judgment rendered. We think the above facts constitute good cause, and the clerk will file the transcript and statement of facts.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022226EN.01000301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/3 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10737 – HP / POLY)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 226/03)

1.

On 2 June 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022226EN.01000301-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | HP Inc. (‘HP’, US), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Plantronics, Inc. (‘Poly’, US). |

HP will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Poly.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for HP: provision of personal computing and other access devices, imaging and printing products, and related technologies, solutions and services, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Poly: global communications technology company that designs, manufactures, and markets integrated communications and collaboration solutions for professionals. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10737 – HP / POLY

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022226EN.01000301-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 183 (Friday, September 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 77165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21506]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Centers of Excellence for 
Translational Research (U19 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: October 29-31, 2024.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G53, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Contact Person: Caitlin A. Brennan, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G53, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 761-7792, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#395a58504d555057175b4b5c575758570b79575051175e564f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4221232b362e2b2c6c2030272c2c232c70022c2b2a6c252d34">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 16, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-21506 Filed 9-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package International Service contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification Schedule.

# DATES:

*Date of notice:*                         September 17, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-7820.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package International Service Contract 46 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-656 and CP2024-665.                

Colleen Hibbert-Kapler,

Attorney, Ethics and Legal Compliance.

[FR Doc. 2024-21118 Filed 9-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>





                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                             TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


Amendment No. l to the Employment Agreement dated as of May 5, 1997 (the
"Employment Agreement") between Riddell Sports Inc., a Delaware corporation,
(the "Company") and W. Kline Boyd ("Mr. Boyd")

WHEREAS, Mr. Boyd has been elected Senior Vice President and General Manager -
Varsity Spirit Fashions of Varsity Spirit Corporation ("Varsity").

WHEREAS, the Employment Agreement, unless extended, expires on the June 19, 1999
and the Company wishes to provide Mr. Boyd incentives to continue providing
leadership in the Company and to extend the term of the Employment Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged the parties agree as follows:

         1.       Section 1 of the Employment Agreement be and hereby is
                  amended to provide in full as follows:

                          "1.      Employment. This agreement is for the
                                   two-year period (the "Employment Period")
                                   commencing on June 19, 1999 and terminating
                                   on June 19, 2001 or upon earlier termination
                                   of the Executive's employment.

         2.       The Company's obligations under Section 2, "Inducement for
                  Employment" have been fulfilled by the Company.

Dated: August 2, 1999



                                                  RIDDELL SPORTS INC.


                                                  By:   /s/ David Groelinger
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     David Groelinger
                                                     EVP & CFO


                                                  EXECUTIVE:

                                                   /s/ W. Kline Boyd
                                                  ----------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States.

# ACTION:

Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules; notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules will hold a meeting in a hybrid format with remote attendance options on November 8, 2024 in New York, NY. The meeting is open to the public for observation but not participation. An agenda and supporting materials will be posted at least 7 days in advance of the meeting at:                         *https://www.uscourts.gov/​rules-policies/​records-and-archives-rules-committees/​agenda-books.*

# DATES:

November 8, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        H. Thomas Byron III, Esq., Chief Counsel, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-1820,                         *RulesCommittee_Secretary@ao.uscourts.gov.*

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

Dated: September 13, 2024.

Shelly L. Cox,

Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.

[FR Doc. 2024-21273 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P