alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2679 

To provide for the admission to the United States of certain Tibetans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2015 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself and Ms. LOFGREN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for the admission to the United States of certain 

Tibetans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tibetan Refugee As5 sistance Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TRANSITION FOR DISPLACED TIBETANS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the numerical 

8 limitations specified in sections 201 and 202 of the Immi9 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151 and 1152), 

10 there shall be made available to qualified displaced Tibet11 ans described in subsection (b) of this section 3,000 immiVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:01 Jun 06, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2679.IH H2679

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2679 IH

1 grant visas in the 3-fiscal-year period beginning with fiscal 

2 year 2016. 

3 (b) QUALIFIED DISPLACED TIBETAN DESCRIBED.— 

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—An individual is a qualified 

5 displaced Tibetan if such individual is an individual 

6 who— 

7 (A) is a native of Tibet; and 

8 (B) since before the date of the enactment 

9 of this Act, has been continuously residing in 

10 India or Nepal. 

11 (2) NATIVE OF TIBET DESCRIBED.—For pur12 poses of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), an indi13 vidual shall be considered to be a native of Tibet if 

14 such individual was born in Tibet or is the son, 

15 daughter, grandson, or granddaughter of an indi16 vidual born in Tibet. 

17 (c) DISTRIBUTION OF VISA NUMBERS.—The Sec18 retary of State shall ensure that immigrant visas provided 

19 under subsection (a) are made available to qualified dis20 placed Tibetans described in subsection (b) (or described 

21 in subsection (d) as the spouse or child of such a qualified 

22 displaced Tibetan) in an equitable manner, giving pref23 erence to those qualified displaced Tibetans who are not 

24 resettled in India or Nepal or who are most likely to be 

25 resettled successfully in the United States. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2679 IH

1 (d) DERIVATIVE STATUS FOR SPOUSES AND CHIL2 DREN.—A spouse or child (as defined in subparagraph 

3 (A), (B), (C), (D), or (E) of section 101(b)(1) of the Im4 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(b)(1))) 

5 shall, if not otherwise entitled to an immigrant status and 

6 the immediate issuance of a visa under this section, be 

7 entitled to the same status, and the same order of consid8 eration, provided under this section, if accompanying, or 

9 following to join, the spouse or parent of such spouse or 

10 child. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 163 (Thursday, August 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 52171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20503]

[[Page 52171]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

State Energy Advisory Board (STEAB)

AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable 
Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a teleconference call of the State 
Energy Advisory Board (STEAB). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 
L. 92-463; 86 Stat.770) requires that public notice of these meetings 
be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, September 19, 2013, from 3:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. (EDT). 
To receive the call-in number and passcode, please contact the Board's 
Designated Federal Officer (DFO) at the address or phone number listed 
below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gil Sperling, STEAB Designated Federal 
Officer, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and 
Renewable Energy, 1000 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20585. 
Phone number is (202) 287-1644.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: To make recommendations to the Assistant 
Secretary for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 
regarding goals and objectives, programmatic and administrative 
policies, and to otherwise carry out the Board's responsibilities as 
designated in the State Energy Efficiency Programs Improvement Act of 
1990 (Pub. L. 101-440).
    Tentative Agenda: Receive an update on the activities of the 
STEAB's Taskforces and discuss the formation of new Task Forces to 
assist EERE with the Clean Energy Manufacturing Initiative and other 
proposed programs, provide an update to the Board on routine business 
matters and EERE areas of interest, and work on agenda items and 
details for the October 2013 meeting.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements 
pertaining to agenda items should contact Gil Sperling at the address 
or telephone number listed above. Requests to make oral comments must 
be received five days prior to the meeting; reasonable provision will 
be made to include requested topic(s) on the agenda. The Chair of the 
Board is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 60 days on the STEAB Web site at: 
www.steab.org.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on August 16, 2013.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-20503 Filed 8-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             680
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    308,420
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,046
<PP&E>                                       2,620,890
<DEPRECIATION>                                 973,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,013,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          415,319
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       415,434
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,183,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,013,884
<SALES>                                        841,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               841,818
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,071,331
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              84,208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (299,784)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (300,784)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (300,784)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2577 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2577

 To reauthorize programs authorized under the Debbie Smith Act of 2004.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 20, 2018

Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Heller, Ms. Klobuchar, and 
  Mr. Leahy) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize programs authorized under the Debbie Smith Act of 2004.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Debbie Smith Reauthorization Act of 
2018''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (34 
U.S.C. 40701) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)(3)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``2014 through 
                2019'' and inserting ``2019 through 2024''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``2014 through 
                2019'' and inserting ``2019 through 2024''; and
            (2) in subsection (j), by striking ``2015 through 2019'' 
        and inserting ``2019 through 2024''.

SEC. 3. TRAINING AND EDUCATION.

    Section 303(b) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 2004 (34 
U.S.C. 40722(b)) is amended by striking ``2015 through 2019'' and 
inserting ``2019 through 2024''.

SEC. 4. SEXUAL ASSAULT FORENSIC EXAM GRANTS.

    Section 304(d) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 2004 (34 
U.S.C. 40723(d)) is amended by striking ``2015 through 2019'' and 
inserting ``2019 through 2024''.
                                 <all>
```
Veolia' Veolia's Waste Analysis Plan s Waste Analysis Plan

Dennis J Warchol Dennis J Warchol to: David Ogulei 03/13/2012 02:03 PM

History: This message has been replied to.

David,

I just Fed-x’ed Veolia’s current Waste Analysis Plan to you for arrival tomorrow . Please call if you have 

any questions. 

SERVICE FIRST SAFETY ALWAYS

Dennis J. Warchol

EHS Manager

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C.

Trade Waste Incineration Facility

#7 Mobile Avenue

Sauget, IL 62201

618-271-2804 (ext.169)

618-271-2128 (fax)

Dennis.warchol@VeoliaES.com

www.VeoliaES.com

This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Solutions, LLC is for the sole use of the intended 

recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, 

disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please communicate 

with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message and delete it from all 

computers.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1946

KENNETH MOATS, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DIVISION OF 

HIGHWAYS, f/k/a West Virginia Department of Highways, a 

Corporation; COMMISSIONER PAUL MATTOX, JR.; RAYMOND DUKE 

TACKETT; JEAN FRIEND; NEAL JAY HAMILTON; JUDGE PHILLIP 

GAUJOT; CHIEF JUDGE RUSSELL CLAWGES, JR.; CHAD LAWTHUER; 

JAMES E. STRICKLING,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, 

District Judge. (1:14-cv-00135-IMK-JSK)

Submitted: November 18, 2014 Decided: November 20, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Moats, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Hedges, 

Teresa Jean Lyons, HEDGES LYONS & SHEPHERD, Morgantown, West 

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Moats, Sr., appeals the district court’s order

granting his request that the case be voluntarily dismissed. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See Moats v. West Va. Dep’t of Transp., No. 1:14-cv00135-IMK-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 4, 2014). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|    |                                                                                                                                  |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Electronic Arts Inc. for the periods presented therein. |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |
| /s/ Andrew Wilson       |
| Andrew Wilson           |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| Electronic Arts Inc.    |
|                    |
| May 21, 2014            |
Company
    
    State of OrganizationOtter Tail Energy Services Company, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaOverland Mechanical Services, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaGreen Hills Energy, LLC
    
    MinnesotaSheridan Ridge I, LLC
    
    MinnesotaSheridan Ridge II, LLC
    
    MinnesotaOtter Tail Assurance Limited
    
    Cayman IslandsVaristar Corporation
    
    MinnesotaNorthern Pipe Products, Inc.
    
    North DakotaVinyltech Corporation
    
    ArizonaT.O. Plastics, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaSt. George Steel Fabrication, Inc.*
    
    UtahDMI Industries, Inc.
    
    North DakotaDMI Canada, Inc.
    
    Ontario, CanadaBTD Manufacturing, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaMiller Welding & Iron Works, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaShoreMaster, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaGalva Foam Marine Industries, Inc.
    
    MissouriShoreline Industries, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaAviva Sports, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaShoreMaster Costa Rica, Limitada
    
    Costa RicaDMS Health Technologies, Inc.
    
    North DakotaDMS Imaging, Inc.
    
    North DakotaDMS Imaging Partners, LLC*
    
    DelawareDMS Imaging Partners II, LLC*
    
    DelawareDMS Leasing Corporation*
    
    North DakotaMidwest Construction Services, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaAerial Contractors, Inc.
    
    North DakotaMoorhead Electric, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaLynk3 Technologies, Inc
    
    MinnesotaVentus Energy Systems, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaFoley Company
    
    MissouriChassis Liner Corporation*
    
    MinnesotaE. W. Wylie Corporation
    
    North DakotaIdaho Pacific Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareIdaho-Pacific Corporation
    
    IdahoIdaho-Pacific Colorado Corporation
    
    DelawareAWI Acquisition Company Limited
    
    Prince Edward Island, CanadaAgraWest Investments Limited
    
    Prince Edward Island, Canada
 
 *
    
    Inactive
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 37

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/01

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF APPLIED ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          26,714
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,188
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,635
<PP&E>                                          23,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,673
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,195
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,673
<SALES>                                         45,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,010
<CGS>                                           23,051
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1,466)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    506
<INCOME-TAX>                                       177
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       329
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0911. THOMASINA GOODGAME et al. v. FEDERAL NATIONAL 

MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION.

This case began as a dispossessory action in magistrate court. After the

magistrate court entered judgment in favor ofFederal National Mortgage Association,

Thomasina Goodgame filed an appeal in superior court. The superior court also

entered a writ of possession in favor of Federal National Mortgage Association, and

Goodgame filed an application for discretionary appeal and a notice of appeal to this

Court. We dismissed Goodgame’s application for discretionary appeal as untimely.

See Case No. A16D0122. We, likewise, must dismiss this direct appeal.

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court

decision, Goodgame was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to

obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor

Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). Goodgame’s failure

to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/22/2016

February 22, 2016
EXHIBIT 99.1

P & F INDUSTRIES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of P&F Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Horowitz, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/RICHARD A. HOROWITZRichard A. Horowitz
Principal Executive Officer
March 28, 2003 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

---

QuickLinks
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 4516

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. GREGORY PRESTON COKER, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Spartanburg

. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. ( 7:18

- cr
- 00477

- DCC

- 1 )

Submitted : February 20, 2020 Decided: February 24, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING , Circuit Judge , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
William G. Yarborough, III, Lauren C. Hobbis, WILLIAM G. YARBOROUGH III, ATTORNEY AT LAW, LLC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Sherri A. Lydon, United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, Maxwell B. Cauthen, III, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gregory Coker, Jr., appeals the 72

- month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute cocaine base , in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C) (2018). We have reviewed the record and concl ude that the district court properly sentenced Coker as a career offender. South Carolina Code § 44

- 53

- 375 and § 44

- 53

- 445 are subject to the modified categorical approach , s ee United States v.
Furlow , 928 F.3d 311, 320

- 22 (4th Cir. 2019); United States v . Marshall , 747 F. App’x 139, 149

- 50 (4th Cir. 2018) (argued but unpublished) , so the district court correctly considered Coker’s prior indictments and sentencing sheets pursuant to Shepard v. United
States , 544 U.S. 13, 26 (2005). Based on those document s, the district court did not clearly err in its conclusion that Coker had two prior controlled substance convictions pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual §§ 4B1.1, 4B1.2 (2018). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s criminal judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED