Facility _Information

facility _id utility

_code legal_owner_nam e

legl_operator_name

legal_address_type

legal_address

legal_city legal_state legal_zip 6183 16624 San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc.

legal owner6200 FM 3387 Christine TX 78012

Page 1Facility _Information

plant_nam e

physical_address

phyical_city

physical_state

physical_zip

ma iling_address

ma iling_city

ma iling_state

ma iling_zip San Miguel 6200 FM 3387 Christine TX 78012 P.O. Box 280 Jourdanton TX 78026

Page 2Facility _Information

RFA_small_entity

ff_fired_coal

ff_fired_oil ff_fired_ngas ff_fired_petcoke

ff_fired_other

ff_permitted_coal

ff_permitted_oil

ff_permitted_ngas Don't Know TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE FALSE

Page 3Facility _Information

ff_permitted_petcoke

ff_permitted_other

deviation_reporting

continuous_emissions

cem_provided

facility _note FALSE FALSE Quarterly deviation reports are submitted for SO2, NOx, CO and Opacity

. No EPA Region 6 Notes for Mercury

Demonstation Testing:Total cost to San Miguel for both demonstration tests was equal to $569,194.70.Additional documentation on testing can be sent upon request.Notes for SNCR Demonstration Testing:Total cost to San Miguel for the demonstration tests was equal to $105,000.00.Additional documentation on testing can be sent upon request.Notes for Fuel Shipments and Analysis:Daily proximate analyses are available upon request.Notes for Test Report Emissions Data:Does not include yearly RATA testing which has already been sent to the EPA.

Page 4Facility _Information

Notes for Mercury

Demonstation Testing:Total cost to San Miguel for both demonstration tests was equal to $569,194.70.Additional documentation on testing can be sent upon request.Notes for SNCR Demonstration Testing:Total cost to San Miguel for the demonstration tests was equal to $105,000.00.Additional documentation on testing can be sent upon request.Notes for Fuel Shipments and Analysis:Daily proximate analyses are available upon request.Notes for Test Report Emissions Data:Does not include yearly RATA testing which has already been sent to the EPA.

Page 5Facility _Information

Notes for Mercury

Demonstation Testing:Total cost to San Miguel for both demonstration tests was equal to $569,194.70.Additional documentation on testing can be sent upon request.Notes for SNCR Demonstration Testing:Total cost to San Miguel for the demonstration tests was equal to $105,000.00.Additional documentation on testing can be sent upon request.Notes for Fuel Shipments and Analysis:Daily proximate analyses are available upon request.Notes for Test Report Emissions Data:Does not include yearly RATA testing which has already been sent to the EPA.

Page 6Facility _Information

Notes for Mercury

Demonstation Testing:Total cost to San Miguel for both demonstration tests was equal to $569,194.70.Additional documentation on testing can be sent upon request.Notes for SNCR Demonstration Testing:Total cost to San Miguel for the demonstration tests was equal to $105,000.00.Additional documentation on testing can be sent upon request.Notes for Fuel Shipments and Analysis:Daily proximate analyses are available upon request.Notes for Test Report Emissions Data:Does not include yearly RATA testing which has already been sent to the EPA.

Page 7Facility _Information

Notes for Mercury

Demonstation Testing:Total cost to San Miguel for both demonstration tests was equal to $569,194.70.Additional documentation on testing can be sent upon request.Notes for SNCR Demonstration Testing:Total cost to San Miguel for the demonstration tests was equal to $105,000.00.Additional documentation on testing can be sent upon request.Notes for Fuel Shipments and Analysis:Daily proximate analyses are available upon request.Notes for Test Report Emissions Data:Does not include yearly RATA testing which has already been sent to the EPA.

Page 8Facility _Information

Notes for Mercury

Demonstation Testing:Total cost to San Miguel for both demonstration tests was equal to $569,194.70.Additional documentation on testing can be sent upon request.Notes for SNCR Demonstration Testing:Total cost to San Miguel for the demonstration tests was equal to $105,000.00.Additional documentation on testing can be sent upon request.Notes for Fuel Shipments and Analysis:Daily proximate analyses are available upon request.Notes for Test Report Emissions Data:Does not include yearly RATA testing which has already been sent to the EPA.

Page 9Facility _Information

Notes for Mercury

Demonstation Testing:Total cost to San Miguel for both demonstration tests was equal to $569,194.70.Additional documentation on testing can be sent upon request.Notes for SNCR Demonstration Testing:Total cost to San Miguel for the demonstration tests was equal to $105,000.00.Additional documentation on testing can be sent upon request.Notes for Fuel Shipments and Analysis:Daily proximate analyses are available upon request.Notes for Test Report Emissions Data:Does not include yearly RATA testing which has already been sent to the EPA.

Page 10facility _contacts

facility _id contact_id contact_title contact_name

contact_phone1

contact_phone2

contact_email

contact_primary 6183 1 Environm ental Engineer Lane W illiam s

8307843411264 lwilliam s@smeci.net TRUE

Page 11facility _coal_utilized

facility _id coal_type percentage_mass percentage_btu

synfuel_type

coal_note 6183 lignite 100 100

Page 12facility _oil_utilized

facility _id oil_type percentage_volume percentage_btu

other_type 6183 No.2 Fuel Oil (distillate) 100 100

Page 13facility _other_materials

facility _id other_material

permitted_burn

actually _burn other_quantity

other_quantity

_units other_note rcra_utilize rcra_explain

Page 14facility _other_materials

rcra_explain

Page 15boiler_information

facility _id boiler_id boiler_type boiler_other bottom_design

design_fuel heat_input max_heat_input MW e_capacity 6183 SM-1 Wa ll firing - opposed firing Wet Bottom

coal 4980 4980 440

Page 16boiler_information

MW e_net_capacity

design_gross_efficiency

operating_gross_efficiency

design_pressure

operating_pressure

design_temp

operating_temp

design_reheat_multiple

design_reheat_temp1 391 83 83 2520 2520 1005 1000 FALSE 1005

Page 17boiler_information

design_reheat_temp2

operating_reheat_multiple

operating_reheat_temp1

operating_reheat_temp2

hours_operated

vg_capacity

_factor applicable_NSPS

retirement_year

retirement_year_CBI FALSE 995 7375 83 Subpart D 2037 FALSE

Page 18boiler_information

NOx_control

SO2_control

combustion_additives Yes No No

Page 19boiler_fuels

facility _id boiler_id fuel_type fuel_year percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 6183 SM-1 coal - lignite 2007 98.5 98.5 6183 SM-1 coal - lignite 2008 98.5 98.5 6183 SM-1 coal - lignite 2009 98.5 98.5 6183 SM-1 oil - distillate 2007 1.5 1.5 6183 SM-1 oil - distillate 2008 1.5 1.5 6183 SM-1 oil - distillate 2009 1.5 1.5

Page 20boiler_control_NOx

facility _id boiler_id NOx_type NOx_other NOx_online 6183 SM-1 Low NOx Burner 1/1/1982 6183 SM-1 Other (specify) Low NOx Burner Upgrade

4/1/2004 6183 SM-1 Overfire Air 4/1/2003

Page 21boiler_control_SO2

facility _id boiler_id SO2_type SO2_other SO2_online

Page 22boiler_additives

facility _id boiler_id boiler_additive additive_other

additive_online

Page 23facility _units

facility _id unit_id 6183 6183

Page 24unit_boilers

facility _id unit_id boiler_id 6183 6183 SM-1

Page 25facility _controls

facility _id control_id control_group control_type

control_other

legacy _control cntrol_online

control_offline

NOx_reagent 6183 ESP1 PM control Electrostatic precipitator, cold side, w/o flue gas conditioning FALSE 1/1/1982 6183 SCRUB1 SO2 control Tray type FALSE 1/1/1982

Page 26facility _controls

reagent_other

NOx_ammonia

SO2_sorbent

oher_sorbent

SO2_scrubber_additive

Lim estone Dibasic Acid

Page 27facility _sampling_ports

facility _id sampling_port_id 6183 ESP1 IN 6183 SCRUB1 IN 6183 SNCR Ports

Page 28facility _stacks

facility _id stack_id stack_height stack_diameter

sack_gas_velocity 6183 STACK 1 450 20 90

Page 29configurations

facility _id configuration_id 6183 SMEC1

Page 30configuration_components

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

order component_type port_near 6183 SMEC1 6183 1 Unit 6183 SMEC1 ESP1 3 PM control 6183 SMEC1 ESP1 IN 2 Sam pling Port next 6183 SMEC1 SCRUB1 6 SO2 control 6183 SMEC1 SCRUB1 IN 5 Sam pling Port next 6183 SMEC1 STACK 1 7 Stack

Page 31configuration_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

pollutant_nam e

permit_type_1

em lim it_1 em lim it_units_1 avg_period_1

em lim it_2 em lim it_units_2 6183 SMEC1 PM (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

1300 tons per year (tons/yr)

Continuous 6183 SMEC1 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) State - State Operating Permit

0.165 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

Continuous 6183 SMEC1 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

17075 tons per year (tons/yr)

Continuous 6183 SMEC1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) State - State Operating Permit

3664 tons per year (tons/yr)

Continuous 6183 SMEC1 VOCs State - State Operating Permit 18.19 tons per year (tons/yr)

Yearly 6183 SMEC1 Lead (Pb) State - State Operating Permit 0.89 tons per year (tons/yr)

Yearly

Page 32configuration_pollutants1

avg_period_2

em lim it_3 em lim it_units_3 avg_period_3

em lim it_4 em lim it_units_4 avg_period_4

em lim it_details

test_method Electrostatic Precipitator

Page 33configuration_pollutants1

em rate em rate_units guarantee_level

_explain

req_monitoring

eq_recordkeeping

req_reporting 99 percent by

weight No ContinuousAs required by Title V and State Operating Permit Quarterly

Reports: TCEQ 0.2 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

Yes Wh en installing OPA anf Low NOx Burners, San Miguel requested 0.165 lb/mmBtu but no vendor could meet this request. Early 2000 tim e frame. ContinuousAs required by Title V and State Operating Permit Quarterly

Reports: TCEQ, EPA 85 percent by

weight No ContinuousAs required by Title V and State Operating Permit Quarterly

Reports: TCEQ, EPA No ContinuousAs required by Title V and State Operating Permit Quarterly

Reports: TCEQ None Yearly

Em issions Inventory Yearly Em issions Inventory None Yearly

Em issions Inventory Yearly Em issions Inventory

Page 34control_technologies

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id project_titleproject_type vendor_name

vndor_contact

vendor_phone 6183 SMEC1 6183 2 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement Demonstration

Energy and Environm ental Research Center Brandon Pravlish

7017775065 6183 SMEC1 ESP1 IN 1 Assessment of Mercury Control Options Demonstration

Energy and Environm ental Research Center Brandon Pravlish

7017775065

Page 35control_technologies

vendor_address

vndor_city

vendor_state

vendor_zip actual_start_date projected_start_date

end_date sorbent chemical_additive University

of North Dakota15 North 23rd Street - Stop 9108 Grand Forks

ND 58202-9108 5/4/2009 5/14/2009 RLP SF11 at a 0.56 lb/Macf and SB11 at 3.5 lb/Macf University

of North Dakota15 North 23rd Street - Stop 9018 Grand Forks

ND 58202-90185/18/2008 6/4/2008 DARCO HG-LH at 4 lb/Macf SEA2 at 50 ppm

Page 36control_technologies

injection_point

HAP_em ission_reduction

HAP_em ission_rate

HAP_em ission_rate_units

HAP_achieved_reduction

HAP_achieved_rate

HAP_achieved_rate_units

feed_rate feed_rate_units Economizer Outlet 90 1.9 lb/TBtu 81.7 3.23 lb/TBtu Economizer Outlet 90 1.9 lb/TBtu 78.5 4.56 lb/TBtu

Page 37control_technologies

feed_rate_units

Page 38control_coal_ranks

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id coal_type 6183 SMEC1 6183 2 lignite 6183 SMEC1 ESP1 IN 1 lignite

Page 39control_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id pollutant_nam e 6183 SMEC1 ESP1 IN 1 Total Mercury (Hgt) 6183 SMEC1 6183 2 Total Mercury (Hgt)

Page 40control_costs

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id boiler_retrofit boiler_new_install

total_capital_investm ent

total_operating_costs

base_year 6183 SMEC1 6183 2 No No 0 0 2009 6183 SMEC1 ESP1 IN 1 No No 0 0 2008

Page 41control_costs

CBI FALSE FALSE

Page 42mi sc_controls

facility _id mi sc_control_id

control_description

Page 43mi sc_control_configurations

facility _id mi sc_control_id

configuration_id

Page 44fuel_shipments

facility _id shipment_id

shipment_date

am ount_received

am ount_units

fuel_type state_country other_country

county 6183 April 2009 4/1/2009 198616 short tons (2000 lbs) coal TX TX - Atascosa 6183 August 2009 8/1/2009 167373 short tons (2000 lbs) coal TX TX - Atascosa 6183 December 2009

12/1/2009 145788 short tons (2000 lbs) coal TX TX - Atascosa 6183 February

2009 2/1/2009 187142 short tons (2000 lbs) coal TX TX - Atascosa 6183 January

20091/1/2009 227907 short tons (2000 lbs) coal TX TX - Atascosa 6183 July

2009 7/1/2009 229987 short tons (2000 lbs) coal TX TX - Atascosa 6183 June 2009 6/1/2009 206633 short tons (2000 lbs) coal TX TX - Atascosa 6183 May

2009 5/1/2009 205698 short tons (2000 lbs) coal TX TX - Atascosa 6183 Novem ber 2009

11/1/2009 155025 short tons (2000 lbs) coal TX TX - Atascosa 6183 October 2009

10/1/2009 173576 short tons (2000 lbs) coal TX TX - Atascosa 6183 Septem ber 2009

9/1/2009 203794 short tons (2000 lbs) coal TX TX - Atascosa

Page 45fuel_shipments

coal_seam shipment_method Yegua Trucks Yegua Trucks Yegua Trucks Yegua Trucks Yegua Trucks Yegua Trucks Yegua Trucks Yegua Trucks Yegua Trucks Yegua Trucks Yegua Trucks

Page 46fuel_shipment_configurations

facility _id shipment_id

configuration_id 6183 April 2009 SMEC1 6183 August 2009

SMEC1 6183 December 2009

SMEC1 6183 February

2009 SMEC1 6183 January

2009 SMEC1 6183 July

2009 SMEC1 6183 June 2009 SMEC1 6183 May

2009 SMEC1 6183 Novem ber 2009

SMEC1 6183 October 2009

SMEC1 6183 Septem ber 2009

SMEC1

Page 47fuel_shipment_samples

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id am ount_fuel am ount_fuel_units

total_sulfur ash_content heating_value

hating_units 6183 April 2009 April 2009 198616 tons 3.53 40.41 7420 Btu/lb 6183 August 2009

August 2009 167373 tons 3.39 40.87 7314 Btu/lb 6183 December 2009

December 2009

145788 tons 3.53 40.95 7386 Btu/lb 6183 February

2009 February 2009 187142 tons 3.02 43.43 6678 Btu/lb 6183 January

2009 January 2009 227907 tons 3.78 39.87 7414 Btu/lb 6183 July

2009 July

2009 229987 tons 3.42 41.28 7284 Btu/lb 6183 June 2009 June 2009 206633 tons 3.44 40.11 7450 Btu/lb 6183 May

2009 May

2009 205698 tons 3.49 40.36 7331 Btu/lb 6183 Novem ber 2009

Novem ber 2009

155025 tons 3.6 40.31 7494 Btu/lb 6183 October 2009

October 2009 173576 tons 3.64 39.91 7469 Btu/lb 6183 Septem ber 2009

Septem ber 2009

203794 tons 3.68 41.45 7340 Btu/lb

Page 48fuel_shipment_samples

chlorine chlorine_units fluorine fluorine_units data_provided

data_other_specified

supplier_type

supplier_name

supplier_address 350.2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) standard operational procedures Other San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. 6200 FM 3387 563.6 parts per million (dry) (ppm) standard operational procedures Other San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. 6200 FM 3387 517.7 parts per million (dry) (ppm) standard operational procedures Other San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. 6200 FM 3387 296.4 parts per million (dry) (ppm) standard operational procedures Other San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. 6200 FM 3387 473.3 parts per million (dry) (ppm) standard operational procedures Other San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. 6200 FM 3387 553.8 parts per million (dry) (ppm) standard operational procedures Other San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. 6200 FM 3387 366.7 parts per million (dry) (ppm) standard operational procedures Other San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. 6200 FM 3387 430.9 parts per million (dry) (ppm) standard operational procedures Other San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. 6200 FM 3387 549.9 parts per million (dry) (ppm) standard operational procedures Other San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. 6200 FM 3387 498.5 parts per million (dry) (ppm) standard operational procedures Other San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. 6200 FM 3387 509 parts per million (dry) (ppm) standard operational procedures Other San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. 6200 FM 3387

Page 49fuel_shipment_samples

supplier_city

supplier_state

supplier_zip

lab_nam e lab_address lab_city lab_state lab_zip analysis_copies Christine TX 78012 Advanced Analy tical Laboratories, LLC 15040 Hwy

110 SouthP.O. Box 760 Wh itehouse

TX 75791 No Christine TX 78012 Advanced Analy tical Laboratories, LLC 15040 Hwy

110 SouthP.O. Box 760 Wh itehouse

TX 75791 No Christine TX 78012 Advanced Analy tical Laboratories, LLC 15040 Hwy

110 SouthP.O. Box 760 Wh itehouse

TX 75791 No Christine TX 78012 Advanced Analy tical Laboratories. LLC 15040 Hwy

110 SouthP.O. Box 760 Wh itehouse

TX 75791 No Christine TX 78012 Advanced Analy tical Laboratories, LLC 15040 Hwy

110 SouthP.O. Box 760 Wh itehouse

TX 75791 No Christine TX 78012 Advanced Analy tical Laboratories, LLC 15040 Hwy

110 SouthP.O. Box 760 Wh itehouse

TX 75791 No Christine TX 78012 Advanced Analy tical Laboratories, LLC 15040 Hwy

110 SouthP.O. Box 760 Wh itehouse

TX 75791 No Christine TX 78012 Advanced Analy tical Laboratories, LLC 15040 Hwy

110 SouthP.O. Box 760 Wh itehouse

TX 75791 No Christine TX 78012 Advanced Analy tical Laboratories, LLC 15040 Hwy

110 SouthP.O. Box 760 Wh itehouse

TX 75791 No Christine TX 78012 Advanced Analy tical Laboratories, LLC 15040 Hwy

110 SouthP.O. Box 760 Wh itehouse

TX 75791 No Christine TX 78012 Advanced Analy tical Laboratories, LLC 15040 Hwy

110 SouthP.O. Box 760 Wh itehouse

TX 75791 No

Page 50fuel_shipment_samples

analysis_copies

Page 51fuel_sample_pollutants

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id fuel_pollutant pollutant_conc

pollutant_conc_units

pollutant_conc_ND

pollutant_conc_MDL 6183 April 2009 April 2009 Mercury (Hg) 0.214 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 August 2009

August 2009

Mercury (Hg) 0.202 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 December 2009

December 2009

Mercury (Hg) 0.195 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 February

2009 February 2009 Mercury (Hg) 0.3 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 January

2009 January 2009 Antim ony

(Sb) 1.85 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 January

2009 January 2009 Arsenic (As) 3.85 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 January

2009 January 2009 Barium(Ba) 95.5 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 January

2009 January 2009 Beryllium (Be) 0.05 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 January

2009 January 2009 Cadmium (Cd) 0.05 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 January

2009 January 2009 Chromium (Cr) 3.4 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 January

2009 January 2009 Cobalt (Co) 3.1 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 January

2009 January 2009 Copper (Cu) 9.3 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 January

2009 January 2009 Lead (Pb) 8.1 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 January

2009 January 2009 Manganese (Mn) 110 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 January

2009 January 2009 Mercury (Hg) 0.257 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 January

2009 January 2009 Molybdenum (Mo) 0.7 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 January

2009 January 2009 Nickel (Ni) 2.1 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 January

2009 January 2009 Selenium (Se) 4.6 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 January

2009 January 2009 Vanadium (V) 15.1 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 July

2009 July

2009 Antim ony

(Sb) 0.125 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 July

2009 July

2009 Arsenic (As) 0.35 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 July

2009 July

2009 Barium(Ba) 16.6 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 July

2009 July

2009 Beryllium (Be) 0.01 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 July

2009 July

2009 Cadmium (Cd) 0.063 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 July

2009 July

2009 Chromium (Cr) 2.24 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 July

2009 July

2009 Cobalt (Co) 1.38 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 July

2009 July

2009 Copper (Cu) 5.59 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 July

2009 July

2009 Lead (Pb) 1.86 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 July

2009 July

2009 Manganese (Mn) 6.46 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 July

2009 July

2009 Mercury

(Hg) 0.205 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 July

2009 July

2009 Molybdenum (Mo) 0.7 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 July

2009 July

2009 Nickel (Ni) 0.963 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 July

2009 July

2009 Selenium (Se) 5.26 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 July

2009 July

2009 Vanadium (V) 8.5 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 June 2009 June 2009 Mercury (Hg) 0.207 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 May

2009 May

2009 Mercury

(Hg) 0.302 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Novem ber 2009

Novem ber 2009

Mercury (Hg) 0.236 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 October 2009

October 2009

Mercury (Hg) 0.231 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Septem ber 2009

Septem ber 2009

Mercury (Hg) 0.217 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE

Page 52test_reports

facility _id report_id report_type other_type report_description report_begin_date

report_end_date

before_control

during_deviation 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options other Research Research test to evaluate sorbent based technologies that may be appropriate to address upcoming mercury control requirements. 5/24/2008 6/4/2008 Yes No 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

other Research Identify and evaluate additional technology options that could be used to meet future mercury requirements 5/3/2009 5/14/2009 Yes No

Page 53test_reports

deviation_reports No No

Page 54test_report_configurations

facility _id report_id configuration_id 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options SMEC1 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SMEC1

Page 55test_report_fuels

facility _id report_id fuel_id 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options Lignite 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

Lignite

Page 56test_report_fuel_types

facility _id report_id fuel_id fuel_type percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options Lignite coal - lignite 100 100 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

Lignite coal - lignite 100 100

Page 57cem_data

facility _id tim e_period

cem_period_description

Page 58cem_data_pollutants1

facility _id tim e_period

pollutant_nam e

Page 59test_report_sampling

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id point_differ point_description befre_SO2_device

point_orientation

normal_bypass_percent

testing_bypass_percent 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN No Yes D 0 0 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options SCRUB1 IN

No Yes D 0 0 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 No No 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

ESP1 IN No Yes D 0 0 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

No Yes D 0 0 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 No No

Page 60test_report_sampling

fg_fraction

Page 61sampling_runs

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id start_datetime end_datetim e

unit_load net_generation fg_moisture_content 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 1 5/24/2008 5/24/2008 435 15.4 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 2 5/25/2008 5/25/2008 432 15.4 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 3 5/26/2008 5/26/2008 435 15.4 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 4 5/29/2008 5/29/2009 436 15.4 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 5 5/29/2008 5/29/2008 436 15.4 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 6 5/30/2008 5/30/2008 440 15.4 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 7 6/4/2008 6/4/2008 433 15.4 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options SCRUB1 IN

3 5/26/2008 5/26/2008 435 15.4 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options SCRUB1 IN

4 5/29/2008 5/29/2008 436 15.4 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options SCRUB1 IN

5 5/29/2008 5/29/2008 436 15.4 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options SCRUB1 IN

6 5/30/2008 5/30/2008 440 15.4 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options SCRUB1 IN

7 6/4/2008 6/4/2008 433 15.4 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 1 5/24/2008 5/24/2008 435 19.8 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 2 5/25/2008 5/25/2008 432 19.8 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 3 5/26/2008 5/26/2008 435 19.8 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 4 5/29/2008 5/29/2008 436 19.8 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 5 5/29/2008 5/29/2008 436 19.8 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 6 5/30/2008 5/30/2008 440 19.8 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

ESP1 IN 1 5/3/2009 5/3/2009 440 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

ESP1 IN 2 5/4/2009 5/4/2009 440 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

1 5/3/2009 5/3/2009 440 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

10 5/11/2009 5/11/2009 439 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

11 5/11/2009 5/11/2009 439 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

12 5/11/2009 5/11/2009 439 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

13 5/12/2009 5/12/2009 438 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

14 5/12/2009 5/12/2009 438 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

15 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 439 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

16 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 438 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

17 5/14/2009 5/14/2009 441 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

18 5/14/2009 5/14/2009 441 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

2 5/4/2009 5/4/2009 436 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

3 5/6/2009 5/6/2009 437 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

4 5/8/2009 5/8/2009 440 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

5 5/8/2009 5/8/2009 440 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

6 5/9/2009 5/9/2009 439 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

7 5/9/2009 5/9/2009 439 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

8 5/10/2009 5/10/2009 440 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

9 5/10/2009 5/10/2009 440 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 1 5/3/2009 5/3/2009 440 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 10 5/11/2009 5/11/2009 439 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 11 5/11/2009 5/11/2009 439 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 12 5/11/2009 5/11/2009 439 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 13 5/12/2009 5/12/2009 438 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 14 5/12/2009 5/12/2009 438 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 15 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 438 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 16 5/13/2009 5/13/2009 438 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 17 5/14/2009 5/14/2009 441 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 18 5/14/2009 5/14/2009 441 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 2 5/4/2009 5/4/2009 436 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 3 5/6/2009 5/6/2009 437 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 4 5/8/2009 5/8/2009 440

Page 62sampling_runs

6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 5 5/8/2009 5/8/2009 440 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 6 5/9/2009 5/9/2009 439 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 7 5/9/2009 5/9/2009 439 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 8 5/10/2009 5/10/2009 440 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 9 5/10/2009 5/10/2009 440

Page 63sampling_runs

fg_flow_rate

fg_flow_rate_units

standard_temperature

standard_pressure

normal_temperature

normal_pressure

fg_oxygen_content

fg_CO2_content

fg_temperature 1771200 dscfm 91 29.32 7.8 290 1754800 dscfm 88.3 29.41 7.7 290 1750700 dscfm 89.3 29.44 7.8 290 1772567 dscfm 98.5 29.65 7.8 290 1772567 dscfm 102 29.53 7.8 290 1750700 dscfm 88.2 29.59 7.8 290 1709700 dscfm 90 29.35 7.7 290 1750700 dscfm 101.3 29.44 7.8 290 1772567 dscfm 105.7 29.65 7.8 290 1772567 dscfm 105.7 29.65 7.8 290 1750700 dscfm 95.6 29.59 7.8 290 1709700 dscfm 90.9 29.35 7.7 290 1771200 dscfm 90 29.32 7.8 151.3 1754800 dscfm 86.7 29.41 7.7 151.4 1750700 dscfm 86.7 29.44 7.8 151.3 1772567 dscfm 90.6 29.65 7.8 151.6 1772567 dscfm 90.6 29.53 7.8 151.6 1750700 dscfm 89.1 29.59 7.8 150.9 1656400 dscfm 101 29.29 8.4 7.7 290 1634533 dscfm 100.5 29.41 8.6 7.7 290 1656400 dscfm 101 29.29 8.4 7.7 290 1607200 dscfm 98.4 29.53 9.7 7.7 290 1607200 dscfm 98.2 29.53 9.6 7.6 290 1607200 dscfm 101.4 29.5 9.7 7.6 290 1633167 dscfm 94.4 29.5 9.7 7.6 290 1633167 dscfm 103.4 29.38 9.7 7.6 290 1665967 dscfm 96.6 29.38 10 7.5 290 1665967 dscfm 99.8 29.32 10 7.5 290 1689200 dscfm 87.2 29.5 9.9 7.6 290 1689200 dscfm 91.8 29.53 9.9 7.6 290 1634533 dscfm 100.5 29.41 8.6 7.7 290 1645467 dscfm 103 29.23 11.7 7.6 290 1635900 dscfm 100.8 29.35 10.1 7.6 290 1635900 dscfm 101.8 29.23 11.1 7.6 290 1634533 dscfm 101 29.41 9.6 7.6 290 1634533 dscfm 102.8 29.38 9.6 7.6 290 1603100 dscfm 96.4 29.5 9.6 7.7 290 1603100 dscfm 105 29.44 9.6 7.7 290 1656400 dscfm 95.2 29.29 10.7 7.7 157.4 1607200 dscfm 91.8 29.53 10.6 7.6 159.7 1607200 dscfm 101 29.53 10.5 7.6 159.7 1607200 dscfm 102.6 29.5 10.5 7.6 159.7 1633167 dscfm 98.6 29.5 10.7 7.6 158.6 1633167 dscfm 99.4 29.38 10.6 7.6 158.6 1665967 dscfm 99.6 29.38 10.8 7.5 158.3 1665967 dscfm 96.2 29.32 10.8 7.5 158.3 1689200 dscfm 87.2 29.5 10.9 7.5 157.5 1689200 dscfm 91.2 29.53 10.9 7.6 157.5 1634533 dscfm 96.6 29.41 10.6 7.7 156.3 1645467 dscfm 101.5 29.23 12.6 7.6 157.5 1635900 dscfm 98.4 29.35 10.1 7.6 158.5

Page 64sampling_runs

1635900 dscfm 101.8 29.23 11.6 7.6 158.5 1634533 dscfm 102.6 29.41 10.6 7.6 159 1634533 dscfm 103.6 29.43 10.6 7.6 159 1603100 dscfm 99.4 29.5 10.6 7.7 159.5 1603100 dscfm 105 29.44 10.7 7.7 159

Page 65sampling_runs

fg_pressure

Hg_loi test_method run_comments

fuel_id fuel_unit_load fuel_flow_rate

fuel_ash fuel_heating_value PSA Sir Galahad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 436 150000 26.64 7391 PSA Sir Galahad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 432 150000 26.87 7426 PSA Sir Galahad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 435 150000 26.64 7391 PSA Sir Galahad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 436 150000 27.06 7283 PSA Sir Galahad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 436 150000 27.06 7283 PSA Sir Galahad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations Lignite 440 150000 25.41 7716 PSA Sir Galahad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 433 150000 26.64 7391 PSA Sir Galahad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 435 150000 26.64 7391 PSA Sir Galahad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 436 150000 27.06 7283 PSA Sir Galahad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 436 150000 27.06 7283 PSA Sir Galahad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 440 150000 25.41 7716 PSA Sir Galahad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 433 150000 26.64 7391 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 435 150000 26.64 7391 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 432 150000 26.87 7426 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 435 150000 26.64 7391 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 436 150000 27.06 7283 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 436 150000 27.06 7283 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 440 150000 25.41 7716 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent and Ontarion Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 440 150000 31.3 7822 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent and Ontarion Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 439 150000 30.95 7816 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 440 150000 31.3 7823 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 439 150000 34.95 7195 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 439 150000 34.95 7195 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 439 150000 34.95 7195 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 438 150000 31.1 7786 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 438 150000 31.1 7786 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 438 150000 32.2 7621 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 438 150000 32.2 7621 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 441 150000 33.4 7456 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 441 150000 33.4 7456 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 436 150000 30.95 7816 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 437 150000 30 8149 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 440 150000 32.6 7703 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 440 150000 32.6 7703 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 439 150000 33.2 7495 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 439 150000 33.2 7495 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 440 150000 34.6 7414 PSA Sir Galihad Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent Trap data was used for the reported Mercury Concentrations. Lignite 440 150000 34.6 7414 PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 440 150000 31.3 7822 PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 439 150000 34.95 7195 PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 439 150000 34.95 7195 PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 439 150000 34.95 7195 PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 438 150000 31.1 7786 PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 438 150000 31.1 7786 PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 439 150000 32.2 7621 PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 439 150000 32.2 7621 PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 441 150000 33.41 7456 PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 441 150000 33.41 7456 PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 436 150000 30.95 7816 PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 437 150000 30 8149 PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 440 150000 32.6 7703

Page 66sampling_runs

PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 440 150000 32.6 7703 PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 439 150000 33.2 7495 PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 439 150000 33.2 7495 PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 440 150000 34.6 7414 PSA Sir Galihad continuous mercury monitor (CMM). Verification of the CMM was also done periodically with sorbent trap and Ontario Hydro. Sorbent data was used for the reported mercury concentrations. Lignite 440 150000 34.6 7414

Page 67sampling_runs

fuel_sulfur 3.89 3.88 3.89 3.88 3.88 4.01 3.89 3.89 3.88 3.88 4.01 3.89 3.89 3.88 3.89 3.88 3.88 4.01 4.03 4.01 4.03 3.68 3.68 3.68 4.02 4.02 3.84 3.84 3.65 3.65 4.01 4 3.85 3.85 3.83 3.83 3.76 3.76 4.03 3.68 3.68 3.68 4.02 4.02 3.84 3.84 3.65 3.65 4.01 4 3.85

Page 68sampling_runs

3.85 3.83 3.83 3.76 3.76

Page 69sampling_run_pollutants1

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id pollutant_nam e conc conc_units conc_ND conc_MDL 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 1 Total Mercury (Hgt) 20.6 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 3 Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 32.3 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 2 Total Mercury (Hgt) 27.2 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 4 Total Mercury (Hgt) 25.3 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 5 Total Mercury (Hgt) 20.3 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 6 Total Mercury (Hgt) 22 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 7 Total Mercury (Hgt) 12.8 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options SCRUB1 IN

3 Total Mercury (Hgt) 21.4 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options SCRUB1 IN

4 Total Mercury (Hgt) 16.1 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options SCRUB1 IN

5 Total Mercury (Hgt) 14.9 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options SCRUB1 IN

6 Total Mercury (Hgt) 10.4 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options SCRUB1 IN

7 Total Mercury (Hgt) 9.9 mi crogram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 1 Total Mercury (Hgt) 13.3 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 2 Total Mercury (Hgt) 17.8 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 3 Total Mercury (Hgt) 14.6 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 4 Total Mercury (Hgt) 12.3 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 5 Total Mercury (Hgt) 11.8 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 6 Total Mercury (Hgt) 6.2 mi crogram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

1 Total Mercury (Hgt) 30.41 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

2 Total Mercury (Hgt) 16.19 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

3 Total Mercury (Hgt) 10.09 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

4 Total Mercury (Hgt) 14.38 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

5 Total Mercury (Hgt) 13.82 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

6 Total Mercury (Hgt) 15.65 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

7 Total Mercury (Hgt) 15.1 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

8 Total Mercury (Hgt) 18.45 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

9 Total Mercury (Hgt) 18.96 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

10 Total Mercury (Hgt) 17.29 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

11 Total Mercury (Hgt) 15.53 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

12 Total Mercury (Hgt) 15.93 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

13 Total Mercury (Hgt) 15.62 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

14 Total Mercury (Hgt) 8.68 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

15 Total Mercury (Hgt) 15.21 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

16 Total Mercury (Hgt) 17.07 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

17 Total Mercury (Hgt) 13.85 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

18 Total Mercury (Hgt) 11.4 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

ESP1 IN 1 Total Mercury (Hgt) 30.41 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

ESP1 IN 2 Total Mercury (Hgt) 16.19 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 1 Total Mercury (Hgt) 14.37 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 2 Total Mercury (Hgt) 13.68 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 3 Total Mercury (Hgt) 5 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 4 Total Mercury (Hgt) 8.21 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 5 Total Mercury (Hgt) 7.33 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 6 Total Mercury (Hgt) 8.55 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 7 Total Mercury (Hgt) 7.5 mi crogram per dry

standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 8 Total Mercury (Hgt) 8.39 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 9 Total Mercury (Hgt) 10.96 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 10 Total Mercury (Hgt) 9.82 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 11 Total Mercury (Hgt) 7.02 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 12 Total Mercury (Hgt) 7.36 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 13 Total Mercury (Hgt) 7.77 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE

Page 70sampling_run_pollutants1

6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 14 Total Mercury (Hgt) 4.25 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 15 Total Mercury (Hgt) 7.69 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 16 Total Mercury (Hgt) 8.57 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 17 Total Mercury (Hgt) 6.31 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 18 Total Mercury (Hgt) 10.88 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE

Page 71sampling_run_pollutants1

em ission_rate

em ission_rate_units

em ission_rate_ND

em ission_rate_MDL

em ission_factor

em ission_factor_units

em ission_factor_ND

em ission_factor_MDL

run_pollutant_comment FALSE FALSE Baseline, Nothing Added FALSE FALSE Baseline, Nothing Added FALSE FALSE Baseline, Nothing Added FALSE FALSE Darco Activitated Carbon Added FALSE FALSE Darco-LH Brominated Activitated Carbon Added FALSE FALSE Darco Activited Carbon and SEA2 Sorbent Added FALSE FALSE Darco Activitated and SEA2 Sorbent Added FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE

Page 72sampling_run_pollutants1

FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE

Page 73sampling_run_pollutants1

run_pollutant_comment Baseline, Nothing Added Baseline, Nothing Added Baseline, Nothing Added Darco Activitated Carbon Added Darco-LH Brominated Activitated Carbon Added Darco Activited Carbon and SEA2 Sorbent Added Darco Activitated and SEA2 Sorbent Added

Page 74sampling_run_fuel

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id fuel_pollutant fuel_conc fuel_conc_units fuel_conc_ND

fuel_conc_MDL 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 1 Mercury (Hg) 0.16 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 2 Mercury (Hg) 0.198 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 3 Mercury (Hg) 0.213 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 4 Mercury (Hg) 0.172 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 5 Mercury (Hg) 0.172 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 6 Mercury (Hg) 0.174 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options ESP1 IN 7 Mercury (Hg) 0.178 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options SCRUB1 IN

3 Mercury

(Hg) 0.213 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options SCRUB1 IN

4 Mercury

(Hg) 0.172 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options SCRUB1 IN

5 Mercury

(Hg) 0.172 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options SCRUB1 IN

6 Mercury

(Hg) 0.174 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options SCRUB1 IN

7 Mercury

(Hg) 0.178 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 1 Mercury (Hg) 0.213 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 2 Mercury (Hg) 0.172 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 3 Mercury (Hg) 0.213 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 4 Mercury (Hg) 0.172 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 5 Mercury (Hg) 0.172 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Assessment of Mercury Control Options STACK 1 6 Mercury (Hg) 0.174 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

ESP1 IN 1 Mercury (Hg) 0.218 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

ESP1 IN 2 Mercury (Hg) 0.181 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

1 Mercury

(Hg) 0.218 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

10 Mercury

(Hg) 0.192 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

11 Mercury

(Hg) 0.192 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

12 Mercury

(Hg) 0.192 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

13 Mercury

(Hg) 0.192 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

14 Mercury

(Hg) 0.192 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

15 Mercury

(Hg) 0.202 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

16 Mercury

(Hg) 0.202 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

17 Mercury

(Hg) 0.212 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

18 Mercury

(Hg) 0.212 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

2 Mercury

(Hg) 0.181 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

3 Mercury

(Hg) 0.174 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

4 Mercury

(Hg) 0.181 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

5 Mercury

(Hg) 0.181 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

6 Mercury

(Hg) 0.191 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

7 Mercury

(Hg) 0.191 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

8 Mercury

(Hg) 0.176 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

SCRUB1 IN

9 Mercury

(Hg) 0.176 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 1 Mercury (Hg) 0.218 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 10 Mercury (Hg) 0.192 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 11 Mercury (Hg) 0.192 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 12 Mercury (Hg) 0.192 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 13 Mercury (Hg) 0.202 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 14 Mercury (Hg) 0.202 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 15 Mercury (Hg) 0.202 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 16 Mercury (Hg) 0.202 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 17 Mercury (Hg) 0.212 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 18 Mercury (Hg) 0.212 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 2 Mercury (Hg) 0.181 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 3 Mercury (Hg) 0.174 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 4 Mercury (Hg) 0.181 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE

Page 75sampling_run_fuel

6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 5 Mercury (Hg) 0.181 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 6 Mercury (Hg) 0.191 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 7 Mercury (Hg) 0.191 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 8 Mercury (Hg) 0.176 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE 6183 Demonstration of Sorbent Enhancement

STACK 1 9 Mercury (Hg) 0.176 mi lligramper kilogram (dry) (mg/kg) FALSE

Page 76sampling_run_fuel

fuel_conc_MDL

Page 77