alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INTERIM
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,995,731
<SECURITIES>                                 3,830,083
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,051,759
<PP&E>                                       2,249,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                 668,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,905,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,533,832
<BONDS>                                      1,028,799
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,204
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,332,778
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,905,613
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            27,046,189
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             112,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (29,065,113)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (29,065,113)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (29,065,113)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.90)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2    CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I,
David M. Gandossi, Chief Financial Officer of Mercer International Inc. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|Dated: March 12, 2004 | /s/DAVID M. GANDOSSIDavid M. Gandossi
Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------

---

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mercer International Inc. and will be retained by Mercer International Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: July 24, 2014 105874

________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LEWIS H. BUSECK, Appellant.

________________________________ Calendar Date: June 9, 2014 Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ.

__________ G. Scott Walling, Queensbury, for appellant, and appellant pro se. Louise K. Sira, District Attorney, Johnstown (Chad W. Brown of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Fulton County (Hoye, J.), rendered January 31, 2013, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal contempt in the first degree. Defendant waived indictment and agreed to be prosecuted by a superior court information charging him with criminal contempt in the first degree. He pleaded guilty to that charge and waived his right to appeal. In accordance with the plea agreement, County Court sentenced defendant, as a second felony offender, to 11⁄2 to 3 years in prison. Defendant appeals. Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no-2- 105874

nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. After reviewing the record, counsel's brief and defendant's pro se submission, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]). Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>



<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 
10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          7,668
<SECURITIES>                                    4,029
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,898
<PP&E>                                            731
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13,695
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,165
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       35,817
<OTHER-SE>                                    (23,579)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13,695
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   38
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (2,034)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2,034)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,034)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.29)
        


</TABLE>
#### FLETCHER v. OLIVAS.

No. 3909.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

Nov. 23, 1939.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 21, 1939.

C. W. Croom, of Houston, for appellant.

Fryer & Milstead and W. Joe Bryan, all of El Paso, for appellee.

HIGGINS, Justice.

This is a suit by Jose Olivas against Bob Fletcher to recover $105 and an attorney’s fee of $20. Upon trial without a jury Oli-vas recovered judgment for $105.

Olivas was employed in the construction of a public work financed by grant from the Urjited ■ States. Lee Moor Contracting Company was the contractor constructing the work. Time checks were issued daily to Olivas by said Company. Weekly pay checks were issued to him by said Company, which were endorsed by Olivas and delivered to Fletcher, who cashed same and accounted to Olivas for much less than the amount of the pay checks. Olivas is an illiterate Mexican and evidently quite ignorant. He was induced to endorse and deliver the checks to Fletcher upon the latter’s false statement to him that the checks had to be endorsed and returned to the Government because he (Olivas) was not a citizen of the United States. The money was not returned to the Government.

Viewed in its aspect most favorable to Olivas, the evidence supports the view the facts are as briefly stated above.

We regard the evidence as showing that Fletcher obtained the endorsement and delivery of the pay checks to him through the false and fraudulent statements indicated. In our opinion it shows a cause of action in favor of Olivas based upon fraud, and judgment was properly rendered for the money collected upon the pay checks by Fletcher and withheld from Olivas.

Chief Justice PRICE did not participate in the disposition of this appeal.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

         STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF PARADYNE NETWORKS, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Paradyne Networks, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick
M. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Patrick M. Murphy
---------------------

Patrick M. Murphy
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
March 20, 2003
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6608

DERRICK EMMANUEL ALLEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THEODIS BECK, Secretary of Correction, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-99-363-HC-5-H) Submitted: September 29, 2000 Decided: October 12, 2000 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derrick Emmanuel Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Derrick Emmanuel Allen seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Allen v. Beck , No. CA-99-363-HC-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2000). We deny Allen’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2022481EN.01000701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 19.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 481/7 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10919 – APOLLO / ATLAS AIR WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 481/04)

1.

On 9 December 2022, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2022481EN.01000701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Apollo Management, L.P. (‘Apollo’, United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (‘Atlas Air’, United States). |

Apollo will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Atlas Air.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Apollo is a global asset manager active in portfolio investments, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Atlas Air provides outsourced aircraft and aviation operating services, mostly for cargo, and to a more limited extent, for passengers, and is active in Africa, Asia, Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, North America and South America. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2022481EN.01000701-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10919 – APOLLO / ATLAS AIR WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2022481EN.01000701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2022481EN.01000701-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2671 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the amount of scholarships 

and duration of obligated service under the Department of Veterans 

Affairs Health Professional Scholarship Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2015 

Mr. MOULTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the amount 

of scholarships and duration of obligated service under 

the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Professional 

Scholarship Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Recruit Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2671 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMOUNT OF SCHOLARSHIP AND DURATION OF OB2 LIGATED SERVICE UNDER DEPARTMENT OF 

3 VETERANS AFFAIRS HEALTH PROFESSIONAL 

4 SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM. 

5 (a) CLARIFICATION OF SCHOLARSHIP AMOUNT.— 

6 Section 7613 of title 38, United States Code, is amended 

7 by inserting ‘‘of up to the entire amount’’ after ‘‘consist 

8 of payment’’. 

9 (b) DURATION OF OBLIGATED SERVICE.—Section 

10 7612(c)(1)(B) of such title is amended by adding at the 

11 end the following new sentence: ‘‘The period of obligated 

12 service may exceed one calendar year for each such school 

13 year or part thereof if the Secretary determines that such 

14 period is appropriate based on the amount and duration 

15 of the scholarship.’’. 

16 (c) APPLICATION.— 

17 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply with respect to individuals 

19 who first enroll in the Department of Veterans Af20 fairs Health Professional Scholarship Program 

21 under subchapter II of chapter 76 of title 38, United 

22 States Code, on or after the date of the enactment 

23 of this Act. 

24 (2) SPECIAL RULE FOR CURRENT PARTICI25 PANTS.—An individual who is enrolled in such pro26 gram as of the day before the date of the enactment 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2671 IH

1 of this Act may elect to be covered by the amend2 ments made by this section with respect to a quar3 ter, semester, or term, as applicable, commencing on 

4 or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
October 10, 2018
No. 04

- 18

- 00675

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF N.M.R. AND A.P.R.N., CHILDREN , From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PA02765 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R In this accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating Appellant’s parental rights to the children , the reporter’s record was due on Octo ber 1 , 201 8

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.1(b). On Octob er 8 , 2018 , court reporter Elva G. Chapa filed a notification of late reporter’s record. She indicated her other duties preclude her from working on the record, and she expects to file the record by Octo ber 1 8 , 2018

. The reporter’s motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record is GRANTED. The reporter’s record must be filed with this court by Octo ber 1 8 , 2018
. See id. R. 35.3(c) (limiting an extension in an accelerated appeal to ten days). The child’s “need for permanence is the paramount consideration for the child’s present and future physical and emotional needs.” See Dupree v. Tex

. Dep ’ t of Protective & Regulatory S ervs
. , 907 S.W.2d 81, 87 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 1995, no writ) . This court must render its decision “with the least possible delay,” and any further delays in obtaining the reporter’s record will hinder this court in its duty. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3 (c); In re J.L. , 163 S.W.3d 79, 82 (Tex. 2005) (quoting T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 263.405(a) (West 2014))

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of October, 20 18

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE , Clerk of Court
# C_2022195EN.01000101.xml

| 13.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10690 – NORDIC CAPITAL / ELLOS GROUP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 195/01)

On 21 April 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10690. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10690. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INTERIM
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       4,570,258
<SECURITIES>                                12,825,955
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,080,603
<PP&E>                                       2,209,266
<DEPRECIATION>                                 548,093
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,822,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,453,686
<BONDS>                                      1,149,042
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,200
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,209,834
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,822,762
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               183,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,428,759
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              77,019
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (19,133,681)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (19,133,681)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (19,133,681)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.92)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022397EN.01000101.xml

| 17.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 397/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 397/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10878 – CVC / LGP / GREEN VERACITY ACQUISITION HOLDINGS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 397/01)

On 10 October 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10878. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10878. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---