alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022031EN.01001401.xml

| 21.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/14

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10587 – BLACKSTONE / WARBURG PINCUS / INTRAFI GROUP)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 31/09)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Blackstone Inc. (US, ‘Blackstone’), |
| --- | --- |

—

Blackstone Inc. (US, ‘Blackstone’),

| — | Warburg Pincus LLC (US, ‘Warburg Pincus’), |
| --- | --- |

—

Warburg Pincus LLC (US, ‘Warburg Pincus’),

| — | Nexus Parent LLC (US, ‘IntraFi Group’), controlled by Blackstone. |
| --- | --- |

—

Nexus Parent LLC (US, ‘IntraFi Group’), controlled by Blackstone.

Blackstone and Warburg Pincus acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of IntraFi Group.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for Blackstone: a global asset manager. It is headquartered in the United States and has offices in Europe and Asia. Blackstone is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Blackstone: a global asset manager. It is headquartered in the United States and has offices in Europe and Asia. Blackstone is listed on the New York Stock Exchange,

| — | for Warburg Pincus: a New York limited liability company and the manager of the Warburg Pincus private equity funds. It is a global private equity firm headquartered in New York, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Warburg Pincus: a New York limited liability company and the manager of the Warburg Pincus private equity funds. It is a global private equity firm headquartered in New York,

| — | for IntraFi Group: a financial technology solutions provider that offers deposit placement and wholesale funding services to financial institutions. |
| --- | --- |

—

for IntraFi Group: a financial technology solutions provider that offers deposit placement and wholesale funding services to financial institutions.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10587 – BLACKSTONE / WARBURG PINCUS / INTRAFI GROUP

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2705 

To clarify the definition of navigable waters, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2015 

Mr. THORNBERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To clarify the definition of navigable waters, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Regulatory 

5 Certainty for Water Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF AGENCY REGULATIONS. 

7 The final rule issued by the Administrator of the En8 vironmental Protection Agency and the Secretary of the 

9 Army entitled ‘‘Clean Water Rule: Definition of ‘Waters 

10 of the United States’ ’’, signed by the Administrator and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2705 IH

1 the Assistant Secretary on May 27, 2015, shall have no 

2 force or effect. 

3 SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF NAVIGABLE WATERS. 

4 Section 502 of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

5 Act (33 U.S.C. 1362) is amended by striking paragraph 

6 (7) and inserting the following: 

7 ‘‘(7) NAVIGABLE WATERS.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘navigable 

9 waters’ means the waters of the United States, 

10 including the territorial seas, that are— 

11 ‘‘(i) navigable-in-fact; or 

12 ‘‘(ii) permanent or continuously flow13 ing bodies of water that form geographical 

14 features commonly known as streams, 

15 oceans, rivers, and lakes that are con16 nected to waters that are navigable-in-fact. 

17 ‘‘(B) EXCLUSIONS.—The term ‘navigable 

18 waters’ does not include— 

19 ‘‘(i) waters that do not physically abut 

20 waters described in subparagraph (A) 

21 through an actual and continuous surface 

22 water connection; 

23 ‘‘(ii) man-made or natural structures 

24 or channels through which water flows 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2705 IH

1 intermittently or ephemerally, including for 

2 the periodic drainage of rainfall; or 

3 ‘‘(iii) wetlands, including playa lakes, 

4 prairie potholes, wet meadows, wet prai5 ries, and vernal pools, that lack a contin6 uous surface water connection to bodies of 

7 water that are waters described in sub8 paragraph (A). 

9 ‘‘(C) NO AGGREGATION.—The aggregation 

10 of wetlands or waters shall not be used to de11 termine whether the wetlands or waters are 

12 navigable waters.’’. 

13 SEC. 4. COAST GUARD. 

14 Nothing in this Act or the amendments made by this 

15 Act shall be construed to impair, diminish, or otherwise 

16 affect the authority, function, jurisdiction, or power of the 

17 Coast Guard, or any member thereof, with respect to the 

18 navigable waters of the United States, or to affect or alter 

19 the status of such waters as navigable waters of the 

20 United States for such purposes. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[4910-I3-P)

Federal AviatioD Administration DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

ERJ 190-100 STD, -100 LR, -100 IGW, -200 STD, -200 LR, and -200 IGW Airplanes 14CFRPart 39 ATEr~ 

# <)'/'f e lDocket No. FAA-2010-0175; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-187-AD; Amendmen O\JTINGSYMOOL 

# rb319 II-ji-i- - 39-*****; AD 2010..;**-**J 

# 1l<:U(J~ RIN 2120-AA64 om 

### S31V Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Mod ~uTI_m"BoL AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransp0l1ation OUHN(i $Y"'~Ol (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We are adopting anew ainvorthiness directive (AD) forthe products list 

# ~:}s~~~~fl) above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) INlTIAi-5"I() condition on an aviation product. The MeALdescribes the unsafe condition as: originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe

Failure to inspect these components according tothe new tasks, thresholds and intervals could prevent atimely detection offatigue cracks. Undetected fatigue cracks in these areas could adversely affect the structural integrity ofthese airplanes. During ERJ 190airplane full scale fatigue test, cracks were found in some structural components ofthe airplane. Analysis ofthese cracks resulted in modifications on the airplane A.i.n¥orthinessLimitation Items (ALl), to include new inspections tasks ormodification ofexisting ones and its respective thresholds and intervals. ATE ROlJT1NGSYMBOL NITlAl..'i/S'G m OlJTJNGS,,"MOOI. Il<ITIAl"'S[G DATE O~'TIN(JSYMBOl. [N[TL'LSISIG DATE 

## * * * * 

## * 

## * *
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(A)

March 29, 2002



Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549

Arthur Andersen LLP has represented to CMS Energy Corporation that its audit was
subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and
auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was
conducted in compliance with professional standards and that there was
appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit, availability
of national office consultation and availability of personnel at foreign
affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.


Sincerely,

/s/ Preston D. Hopper
---------------------------------
Senior Vice President, Controller
and Chief Accounting Officer
Addendum to the Technical Support Document 

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Revisions to the New 

Source Review (NSR) State Implementation Plan (SIP); Prevention for Significant 

Deterioration Review (PSD), Nonattainment NSR (NNSR) for the 1997 8-Hour 

Ozone Standard, NSR Reform, and a Standard Permit 

Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2006-0133 

This an addendum to the Technical Support Document for the proposed action on SIP 

Revisions to the Texas SIP relating to the New Source Review (NSR) State 

Implementation Plan (SIP); Prevention for Significant Deterioration Review (PSD), 

Nonattainment NSR (NNSR) for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard, NSR Reform, and a 

Standard Permit. This addendum identifies changes to the final action relative to the 

September 23, 2009, proposed action. See 74 FR 48467. These changes are the result of 

a later SIP revision that the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality submitted on 

July 16, 2010, that revised 30 TAC 116.160 – Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

Requirements. These changes correct the deficiencies correct the deficiencies identified 

in the proposal. Consequently, EPA is approving the revisions to 30 TAC 116.160 in a 

separate action under Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2010-0620. The changes to the 

Technical Support Document are as follows. 

1. The table on page 1 is revised as follows: 

Section Title Approve, Disapprove, 

or No Action 

* * * * * * * 

Chapter 116 – Control of Air Pollution by Permits for New Construction or Modification 

* * * * * * * 

Subchapter B – New Source Review Permits 

* * * * * * * 

Division 6 – Prevention of Significant Deterioration Review 

30 TAC 116.160 Prevention of Significant Deterioration Requirements No action under Docket 

No. EPA-R06-OAR2006-0133. EPA will 

address this section in a 

separate action under 

Docket No. EPA-R06-

OAR-2010-0620. 

* * * * * * * 

 

2. Page 37 of the Appendix, is under 30 TAC 116.160 – Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration Requirements is revised to read as follows: 

Current SIP-Approved 30 TAC 116.160:

* * * * * 

Revisions considered in this action:

* * * * * 

Proposed Action

• Disapproval of 30 TAC 116.160 was proposed September 23, 2009 (74 FR 

48467) 
Addendum to the Technical Support Document 

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Revisions to the New 

Source Review (NSR) State Implementation Plan (SIP); Prevention for Significant 

Deterioration Review (PSD), Nonattainment NSR (NNSR) for the 1997 8-Hour 

Ozone Standard, NSR Reform, and a Standard Permit 

Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2006-0133 

Final Action

• Based upon subsequent revision to 30 TAC 116.160, submitted July 16, 2010, 

EPA finds that TCEQ has corrected the deficiencies identified in the Proposed 

Rule. In a separate actions under Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2010-0620, EPA is 

now approving the revisions to 30 TAC 116.160 as submitted February 1, 2006, 

and the revisions thereto submitted July 16, 2010. 

3. On pages 37-40 of the Appendix, the Table – Annotation and Evaluation of 

§116.160 – is removed.
**Exhibit10.16**

 

**DESCRIPTION OFHTH MANAGER LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN**

 

 

**I. Purpose of the Plan**

 

In May 2003, WellPointHealth Networks Inc. (“WellPoint” or the “Company”) made a strategic minorityequity investment in Highway to Health, Inc. (“HTH”) and simultaneously enteredinto certain business arrangements with HTH. In connection therewith, the Company was also granted options topurchase a majority interest in and, subsequently, complete ownership of HTH oncertain specified terms during specified periods.  Dennis Mark Weinberg, Executive Vice President and ChiefDevelopment Officer of the Company, is the Company executive responsible formanaging the Company’s on-going relationship with HTH and supervising the Company’sinvestment therein.  In order to properlyincentivize Mr. Weinberg in such duties, in September 2003 the CompensationCommittee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved a special long-termincentive compensation payment to Mr. Weinberg in certain circumstances.

 

**II.            IncentiveCompensation Structure**

 

•                  Thelong-term incentive payments will be payable in cash upon occurrence of any ofthe events specified below.

 

•                  Mr.Weinberg will, in the circumstances described below, become entitled to receivea cash payment equal to 10% of the appreciation in value of WellPoint’s currentequity interest in HTH (measured from the date of WellPoint’s initialinvestment).

 

•                  Upona liquidity event, Mr. Weinberg will become entitled to the described cashpayment.

 

•                  Forpurposes of the long-term incentive payment, a liquidity event is defined asoccurrence any of the following:

 

•                  WellPointexercises its option to purchase 100% of the equity securities of HTH;

•                  HTHcompletes an initial public offering of its equity securities;

•                  WellPointsells all or substantially all of its interest in HTH to an unaffiliated thirdparty; or

•                  Allor substantially all of the equity securities of HTH are sold to an entityunaffiliated with WellPoint.

 

•                  In order to receive the long-termincentive payment, Mr. Weinberg must continue to be employed by WellPoint atthe time of the relevant liquidity event. However, Mr. Weinberg will become vested in the right to payment if heis terminated without cause (using WellPoint’s standard definition as set forthin its Officer Severance Plan) on or after January 1, 2006.

 

•                  The special long-term incentivepayment made to Mr. Weinberg will in no event exceed $2,000,000.

 

----
342 

OFFICE OF THE A’ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

Honorable 0. If. &leg 

County Auditor 

Clay County 

Henrl.ettia, Teas 

Dear Slrr Opinion X0. Q-7523 

R%: Tslxabillty of b&c deposit8 

Pour recent letter Inquiresa whether noney on deposit 

in a bank in this State is wbje6t to tiuatioo. 

iii’6 diiwut your attenticm to Articles 7147 and 7149, 

Reriasd Statutes, 1925. Tbcca 6tatut6s lpkke it alew that 

the mere faot that a taxpayer d-6 not have money in hi6 persoaal poaseat;ion foil dam$ary 1, of a taxable year, but ha8 it 

on&;;g't in P bank,: does not allow ma& fund8 $.o yapa 

. T! ~., 

You laqniro fklSO.at what percmte’e ‘such depofitr 

are to be emk-med. By law, all property, if ncludlng money 

ou deposit, ie raqtllred to be taxed at it6 trw and -1 

vahe (for e statut;ary drfinitioo of tbo term *ialuea a8 used 

ia st6tutjes relating to ad valorcra taxiM.on; bea ArUe 7169, 

uupraji~ Of course, all pmpwty +st be ,66aecseed OR the aaiw 

%P 

: our Constttutisn requlres that tazstioa be equal end 

ttn mm. Therefar%, if less than true and fplU,valw Im the 

bass &wasa&&mmnt of pro.pertLa other that bmk deposits a 

-9 

wit .seelsing to tax bank depoidts,auat~assosr them kw 

t-t ?a~ on the ssms pemeutege barl.8 rrs.ethw texable prp 

perti88.2 

You &l&bask low the A66e6sor-0ollectm uan find.out 

about sue& dopoofts. ae ,&a not consider this 'inquiry a quetk 

tion of lriw, axid hence psruttezw%t disaiosd.~’ thereof. 

,; 

Yours very truly
# C_2022021EN.01000201.xml

| 14.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 21/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 21/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10428 – CDPQ / OTPPB / CMLIC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 21/02)

On 22 October 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10428. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10428. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

In re: LOCALS TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Appellant

______________________

2024

- 1180

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No.

90632969

.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App.

P. 42 (b). Case: 24-1180 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 04/01/2024I N RE : L OCALS T ECHNOLOGY

, I NC

. 2

(2) Each side s hall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

April 1, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: April 1, 2024 Case: 24-1180 Document: 14 Page: 2 Filed: 04/01/2024
*OPINION ISSUED FEBRUARY 20, 2009*

#### CAMBRIDGE CENTER LLC VS. *251DIVISION OF TOURISM

(CC-08-0514)

Wendel B. Turner, Attorney at Law, for claimant.

Ronald R. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Amended Answer.

Claimant seeks to recover $5,930.83 for an invoice that was not submitted by the required due date for reimbursement due to a billing error. The amount represents the proportion of the increase costs of utility and custodial services in excess of the base year for the space occupied by the tenant.

In its Amended Answer, respondent admits the validity of the claim in the amount of $4,834.34. Respondent further states that there were sufficient funds at the close of the fiscal year in question from which the invoice could have been paid. Claimant has agreed to the amount of $4,834.34.

In view of the foregoing, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award to claimant in the amount of $4,834.34.

Award of $4,834.34.
#### YOUNG v. STATE.

No. 16806.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 16, 1934.

Bozeman & Cathey, of Quitman, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is selling 'intoxicating liquor; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for three years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts. In the absence of a statement of facts we are unable to appraise the bills of exception.

No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court. ‘
# C_2022072EN.01000201.xml

| 14.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10540 – ECDC / HPIL / JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 72/02)

On 4 February 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10540. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10540. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1998
<CASH>                                           2,382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,457
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,447
<PP&E>                                          16,923
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,185
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            89
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,046
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               119,826
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,111
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,142
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,457
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,685
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,685
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
        

</TABLE>