alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Sunrise Energy Resources, Inc. a Delaware
      corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,
      2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), Konstantin Tsiryulnikov, Principal Executive Officer of the
      Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with
                the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                Act
                of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the
                Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Sunrise Energy Resources, Inc., and will be retained by Sunrise Energy
      Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.






Date:
                April 2, 2007By:
            /s/
                Konstantin TsiryulnikovKonstantin
                TsiryulnikovChief
                Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1




                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I,  Mitchell  Binder, Acting Chief Executive Officer of Orbit International
Corp.,  certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   1350,  as  enacted  by  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010
(the  "Annual  Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Exchange  Act;  and

     (2)     information  contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations of Orbit
International  Corp.

Dated: March 31, 2011
                                   /s/Mitchell Binder
                                   ------------------
                                   Mitchell Binder
                                   Acting Chief Executive Officer

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Orbit International Corp. and will
be  retained  by  Orbit  International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
#### STORY v. STATE.

No. 16507.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 14, 1934.

E. T. Adams, of Glen Rose, for appellant.

*415Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is adultery; the punishment, a fine of $100.

It was charged in the complaint, in substance, that, appellant, a man, and Dollie Zanders, a woman, on or about the 10th day of February, A. D. 1033, in Somervell county, unlawfully lived together and had carnal intercourse with' each other; the said Dollie Zanders then and there being lawfully married to another person then living. The information failed to charge that appellant and Dollie Zanders unlawfully lived together. However, it was alleged in the information that appellant “did then and there have carnal intercourse with the said Dollie Zan-ders, she being then and there lawfully married to another person then living, towit: Alfred H. Zanders.”

Article 499, P. C., reads as follows: “ ‘Adultery’ is the living together and carnal intercourse. with each other, or habitual carnal intercourse with each other without living together, of a man and woman when either is lawfully married to some other person.”

The statute defines two phases of the offense, one of which is the living together and carnal intercourse with each other, and the other the habitual carnal intercourse with each other without living together. Of course, in each case one of the parties must be lawfully married to some other person. Manifestly, the complaint charges the phase first mentioned, that is, the living together and carnal intercourse with each other. To charge the second phase of the offense it must be alleged that the parties had habitual carnal intercourse with each other without living together. Branch’s Annotated Penal Code, § 1044. The information, in failing to charge that the parties lived together, is at variance with the complaint which, as already pointed out, charged the first phase of the offense. If the complaint had charged adultery by having habitual carnal intercourse, the allegations in the information before us would be insufficient to charge such phase of the offense, as there is no averment that the carnal intercourse was habitual, and no allegation that the parties did not live together.

In view of another trial, it is suggested that inasmuch as it is indicated in the present record that the county attorney was permitted to amend the complaint in a matter of substance, a new complaint should be filed. Manifestly, a new. information will be required.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court. ‘ ' :
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40167

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GEORGE RAYMOND WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:12-CR-177

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the sentence did not delegate to the 

probation officer the decision about mental health treatment. The judge 

during sentencing did indicate his intention to leave at least the ministerial 

details of the sentence to a probation officer; but counsel having pointed out a 

problem, the documented sentence is unobjectionable as it clarified that the 

district court only deemed mental health treatment needed.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 8, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40167 Document: 00512493343 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2014
No. 13-40167

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 13-40167 Document: 00512493343 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/08/2014
Michael Gowaii 7 01/5/ Robertson Unit I207I FM 3522 Abilene, TX 79G01 

# COUHTOFnasMiwS.APPEALS APR 302015 

## AbelAcosta,Cterk

Abel Acosta Cler, Court of Crifti-i-iidl Appeals 

### P.O. Box 12308, Capitol Station Austin, 'IX 78711-2305 April 27, 2015

RE: PDR filed; Cowan v. State, No. 02-14-0034 /-CR (Ft. Worth)
i -5r. Acosta; 

### Please provide i>ie the nuiuber this Office assiyned to ruy PBR in the above referenced appeal. 

### Please • provide we a list of ail juayes currently sittiny on this Court. 

### Thank you for your service arid proiupt response in this niatter.

Sincerely ,
5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 17, 2010 /s/ Robert McCullough Jr.   Robert McCullough Jr.   Chief Executive Officer and
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                             141
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,068
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,332
<PP&E>                                           8,124
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,534
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            90
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,743
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,192
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,145
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,230
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,009
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,494
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,515
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,515
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smith Barney Mid-West Futures Fund L.P. II (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jerry Pascucci, President and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jerry Pascucci                                Jerry PascucciCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President and Director     Date: August 14, 2007

----
steam

_ record - Re: ICR Questionnaire- Request for Extension

Greetings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your exte nsion request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an ex tension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agre es to the extension and establishes a new date.
Sincerely,

-----"Green, Michael" <MGreen@gwfpower.com> wrote: -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Green, Michael" <MGreen@gwfpower.com> Date: 06/25/2010 01:29PM cc: "Kehoe, Mark" <mkehoe@gwfpower.com>, "N evarez, Neftali" <nnevarez@gwfpower.com> Subject: ICR Questionnaire- Request for Extension From: <Alicea.Jezebele @ epamail.epa. g ov> To: "Green, Michael" <MGreen@gwfpower.com> Date: 6/28/2010 3:51 PM Sub j ect: Re: ICR Questionnaire- Request for Extension Pa g e 1 of 2

3/17/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C28C4F4DO

...Dear Ms. Alicea;

GWF Power Systems Co. hereby submits our request for an extension to complete the Clean Water Act ICR ERRATA Sheet- Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines. Please see attached pdf document.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Best Regards;

Michael Green

Environmental Specialist

GWF Power Systems

4300 Railroad Ave.

Pittsburg, CA 94565

Direct (925)431-1442

Mobile (925)260-4102

Fax (925)431-0514

mgreen@gwfpower.com

NOTICE: This communication is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed, is not encrypted, may be attorney-client pr ivileged and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may have received this communicatio n in error, please reply to the sender indicating that fact and delete the copy you received. In addition, you should not copy, re-transmit, disseminate , or otherwise use the information. Thank you.

[ attachment "ERRATA Question naire Extension Request 062410.pdf" removed by Jezebele A licea/DC/USEPA/US] Pa g e 2 of 2

3/17/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C28C4F4DO

...
Exhibit 23.2











Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors Electronic Arts Inc.:





We consent to the use of our audit report dated May 25, 2022, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Electronic Arts Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, incorporated herein by reference.








/s/ KPMG LLP


Santa Clara, California August 15, 2022
EXHIBIT 32.1    CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I,
Jimmy S.H. Lee, Chief Executive Officer of Mercer International Inc. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|Dated: March 12, 2004 | /s/JIMMY S.H. LEEJimmy S.H. Lee
Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------

---

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mercer International Inc. and will be retained by Mercer International Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
# C_2022168EN.01000401.xml

| 22.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10636 – COVÉA / PARTNERRE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 168/04)

On 12 April 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10636. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10636. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
exv10w1



 











Exhibit 10.1




Executive Officer Fiscal Year 2005 Variable Compensation Plan





	1.	 	Proposed corporate goals for FY05 — officer performance based
compensation will be based on the following Company-wide revenues (in
millions of dollars):





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Q1
	 	Q2
	 	Q3
	 	Q4
	 	FY
	 	 	 	 
	Original targets
	 	 	*	 	 	 	*	 	 	 	*	 	 	 	*	 	 	 	*	 	 	 	 	 








	2.	 	The decision to award variable compensation is subject to evaluation each
quarter by the compensation committee, which will consider recommendations
by the CEO, and is based on both company performance (as specified above)
and each officer’s individual performance.






	3.	 	The amounts shall be paid off linearly starting at *% of the sales range
and going to 100%. Should the Company exceed the corporate sales targets,
officers will receive additional compensation calculated by extending the
line starting at *% at the same slope; e.g., the bonus will be double in a
particular quarter if revenues are *% of corporate targets.





It is clearly understood that there is no obligation to push past
corporate targets unless it is deemed in the interest of the Company as a
whole.




	4.	 	The compensation committee recognizes that the Q3 and Q4 targets are
preliminary, and it is likely that the CEO will ask for these numbers to
be reviewed later in the fiscal year.






	5.	 	The compensation committee delegates to the CEO the power to award
Company-wide bonuses to officers provided that the method used to
determine these bonuses is comparable to that used to determine the
bonuses for non-officers.






	*	 	Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with
the Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the
omitted portions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          31,397
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,967
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,262
<PP&E>                                           9,997
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,270
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        73,267
<OTHER-SE>                                       (886)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,559
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,919
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,970
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (389)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.96)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21376]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September XX, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 342 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-663, CP2024-672.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21376 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2022063EN.01000201.xml

| 7.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10563 – ENGIE SPAIN / PREDICA / EOLIA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 63/02)

On 25 January 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10563. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10563. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---