alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 05740**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 05740\05740_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 05740\05740_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 05740\05740_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 05740\05740_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05740\05740_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05740\05740_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05740\05740_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05740\05740_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 05740\Certification Statement_05740.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 05740\Supporting Documentation\05740_Final EPA Copy-Ashtabula-Part A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 05740\Supporting Documentation\05740_Final EPA Copy-Ashtabula-Part A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 05740\Supporting Documentation\Final EPA Copy-Ashtabula-Part D3-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE ESTATE OF JOEL SOTO by and

through its independent administrator,

MARIBEL AMADOR, and MARIBEL

AMADOR, Indiv. and IVAN SOTO,

JOSEL SOTO, JR., and PAULINA SOTO,

all Indiv., By and Through Their Next

Friend, MARIBEL AMADOR,

Ap pellants,

v.

BAUDELIO GONZALEZ MIRELES,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 18

- 00007

- CV

Appeal from the

205th Judicial District Court

of Hudspeth County, Texas

(TC#CV

- 04423

- 205)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellants and their sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5, on the judgment and all

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
[Cite as State ex rel. Swain v. Bartleson, 123 Ohio St.3d 125, 2009-Ohio-4690.]

T HE S TATE EX REL . S WAIN , A PPELLANT , v. B ARTLESON , A PPELLEE . [Cite as State ex rel. Swain v. Bartleson, 123 Ohio St.3d 125, 2009-Ohio-4690.] Civil actions by prison inmates — Affi davit requirement of R.C. Chapter 2969

. (No. 2009-0804

─ Submitted September 2, 2009

─ Decided September 15, 2009.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-09-1047.

__________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment dismissing the petition of appellant, inmate Sean Swain, for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, the inspector of
institutional services at Tole do Correctional Institution, to answer his grievances. “The requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are manda tory, and failure to comply with them subjects an inmate’s action to dismissal.” State ex rel. White v. Bechtel , 99 Ohio St.3d 11, 2003-Ohio-2262, 788 N.E.2d 634, ¶ 5; State ex rel. Manns v.
Henson , 119 Ohio St.3d 348, 2008-Ohio-4478, 894 N.E.2d 47, ¶ 4. R.C. 2969.25(C)(1) required Swain, who filed a decl aration of indigency in which he claimed an inability to pay the costs and fees associated with his mandamus case, to file a statement setting forth his inmate account “for each of the preceding six months, as certified by the institutional cashier.” He did not do so, and his claims on appeal concerning the inapplicability of R.C. 2969.25(A) are insufficient to justify reversal of a judgment that was properly premised in part on R.C. 2969.25(C)(1). We will not reverse a correct judgment simply because some or
all of a lower court’s reasons are erroneous. State ex rel. Deiter v. McGuire , 119 Ohio St.3d 384, 2008-Ohio-4536, 894 N.E.2d 680, ¶ 21. Judgment affirmed.
M OYER , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 __________________ Sean Swain, pro se. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Melissa Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

__________________
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGAN HOLDING CORP.

FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I am the Chief Executive Officer of Regan Holding Corp., a California corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 ("Form 10-K").



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: March 31, 2009

By: /s/ Lynda L. Pitts

Lynda L. Pitts

Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Regan Holding Corp. and will be retained by Regan Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of SCPIE Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i)    the accompanying
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and



(ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |              |  | 
|------ |  | ------------ |  | 
|      
|Dated: |  | May 15, 2003 |  | 
|       |  |              |  | 



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



---



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of SCPIE Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i)    the
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |              |  | 
|------ |  | ------------ |  | 
|      
|Dated: |  | May 15, 2003 |  | 
|       |  |              |  | 



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
****Exhibit 21.1****

 

**Subsidiaries of the Registrant**

 

 

| **Name of subsidiary**                                         |   | **State/Country of Incorporation** |   | **Ownership** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|---------------|
| Outlet Retail Stores, Inc.                                     |   | Delaware                           |   | 100%          |
| Pfaltzgraff Factory Stores, Inc.                          |   | Delaware                           |   | 100%          |
| Syratech Acquisition Corp.                                     |   | Delaware                           |   | 100%          |
| TMC Acquisition Inc.                                           |   | Delaware                           |   | 100%          |
| Wallace Silversmiths de Puerto Rico Ltd.                       |   | Cayman Islands                     |   | 100%          |
| Lifetime Brands, Inc. (HK) Limited                             |   | Hong Kong                          |   | 100%          |
| Lifetime Brands Global Sourcing (Shanghai) Consultancy Limited |   | China                              |   | 100%          |
| LTB de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                                    |   | Mexico                             |   | 99.99%        |
# C_2022353EN.01000101.xml

| 15.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 353/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 353/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10651 – FAERCH / PACCOR)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 353/01)

On 11 August 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10651. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10651. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2812 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 

premiums for insurance which constitutes medical care. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2015 

Mr. KING of Iowa (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. FLEMING, 

Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. YOHO, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. 

LAMALFA, Mr. BABIN, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. PITTENGER, Mr. 

FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. CARTER of Georgia, Mr. HUELSKAMP, Mr. 

HULTGREN, Mr. ISSA, Mr. COLE, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. 

BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. RIBBLE, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. ROUZER, and Mrs. 

BLACKBURN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 

deduction for premiums for insurance which constitutes 

medical care. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Free Health In5 surance Act of 2015’’. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2812 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR PREMIUMS FOR HEALTH INSUR2 ANCE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part VII of subchapter B of chap4 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

5 by redesignating section 224 as section 225 and by insert6 ing after section 223 the following new section: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 224. DEDUCTION FOR PREMIUMS FOR HEALTH IN8 SURANCE. 

9 ‘‘In the case of an individual, there shall be allowed 

10 as a deduction to the taxpayer for the taxable year 

11 amounts paid by the taxpayer for insurance which con12 stitutes medical care (as defined in section 213(d)) for the 

13 taxpayer and the taxpayer’s spouse and dependents. No 

14 amount shall be taken into account under the preceding 

15 sentence if a deduction or credit is allowed for such 

16 amount under this chapter or to any other taxpayer.’’. 

17 (b) DEDUCTION ALLOWED WHETHER OR NOT INDI18 VIDUAL ITEMIZES OTHER DEDUCTIONS.—Subsection (a) 

19 of section 62 of such Code is amended by inserting before 

20 the last sentence at the end the following new paragraph: 

21 ‘‘(22) DEDUCTION FOR PREMIUMS FOR HEALTH

22 INSURANCE.—The deduction allowed by section 

23 224.’’. 

24 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

25 for part VII of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2812 IH

1 is amended by striking the item relating to section 224 

2 and adding at the end the following new items: 

‘‘Sec. 224. Deduction for premiums for health insurance. 

‘‘Sec. 225. Cross reference.’’. 

3 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

5 December 31, 2015. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.6


                           HILCOAST DEVELOPMENT CORP.
                              100 Century Boulevard
                         West Palm Beach. Florida 33417

(561) 640-3105                                                Fax (561) 640-3160

================================================================================





December 31, 2002


nStor Technologies, Inc.
100 Century Blvd
West Palm Beach, FL  33417

Gentlemen:

The maturity  dates of the following  notes due to Hilcoast  Development  Corp.,
from nStor Technologies, Inc., are hereby extended to June 30, 2003:

        Promissory Note for $500,000, dated May 18, 2002
        Promissory Note for $750,000, dated June 14, 2002
        Promissory Note for $500,000, dated July 31, 2002

All other terms of the notes remain the same.

/s/ Mark F. Levy
----------------------------
Mark F. Levy
Vice President and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                       <C>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             9-MOS                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    SEP-30-1996               SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                       OCT-01-1995               OCT-01-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-1996               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                   823,125                 1,459,383
<SECURITIES>                                   0                 2,256,156
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                    0                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,014,646                 3,852,679
<PP&E>                                   137,164                   309,802
<DEPRECIATION>                          (29,246)                 (101,883)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,127,210                 4,358,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     96,530                 1,761,611
<BONDS>                                        0                         0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0                         0 
<PREFERRED>                                    0                         0
<COMMON>                                   3,772                     5,037
<OTHER-SE>                             1,026,908                 2,591,902
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           1,127,210                 4,358,550
<SALES>                                        0                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0                         0
<CGS>                                          0                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0                         0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       1,402,372                 3,653,834
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (1,395,822)               (3,496,950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0                         0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (1,395,822)              (3,496,950)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0                        0 
<CHANGES>                                       0                        0
<NET-INCOME>                          (1,395,822)              (3,496,950)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (0.34)                   (0.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (0.34)                   (0.70)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION



(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, (i) the foregoing Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q SB filed by Yadkin Valley Company (the
Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|Date:    August 9, 2003 | 
|                        |
*OPINION ISSUED MAY 14, 2009*

#### ROY J. MCDANIEL VS. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION

(CC-04-0263)

Claimants appeared *pro se.*

James A. Kirby, Attorney at Law, for respondent.

*253PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted to the Court for decision upon a Stipulation entered into by claimant and respondent wherein certain facts and circumstances of the claim were agreed to as follows:

1. On or about March 27,2004, claimant purchased what he believed was a 1987 International dump truck from respondent for Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000.00) at a public auction under an “as-is” condition.

2. On or about March 27, 2004, claimant discovered said International dump truck was, in fact, a 1986 model year and not a 1987 model year based upon the issued Certificate of Title to the International dump truck.

3. On or about May 12, 2004, claimant filed a claim against respondent in the West Virginia Court of Claims seeking to recover monetary damages in the amount of Seven Thousand, One Hundred Seventy-Two Dollars ($7,172.00).

4. Claimant is currently in possession and he has used said 1986 International dump truck for over four (4) years.

5. The parties hereby agree that a discrepancy, or inaccuracy, existed relative to the model year of the International dump truck during presentation of said dump truck at the public auction and upon the bill of sale to claimant for the purchase of said dump truck both in relation to the issued Certificate of Title.

6. The parties also hereby agree that due to the discrepancy, or inaccuracy, in the description of said dump truck, respondent shall pay claimant the amount of Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($250.00) for a good faith settlement of all claims and demands of claimant in this matter and for the withdrawal and dismissal of this claim.

Based on the foregoing facts, the State of West Virginia, Department of Administration, Purchasing Division/Surplus Property has a moral obligation to issue payment to claimant in the amount of Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($250.00) from Fund #2281 Surplus Property Special Revenue Account.

The Court concludes that $250.00 is a fair and reasonable settlement of this claim.

Award of $250.00.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2790 

To provide for pay parity for civilian employees serving at joint military 

installations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2015 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide for pay parity for civilian employees serving at 

joint military installations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Joint Base Pay Parity 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PAY PARITY FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EM7 PLOYEES EMPLOYED AT JOINT BASES. 

8 (a) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2790 IH

1 (1) the term ‘‘pay locality’’ or ‘‘locality’’ has the 

2 meaning given that term by section 5302 of title 5, 

3 United States Code; and 

4 (2) the term ‘‘locality pay’’ refers to any 

5 amount payable under section 5304 or 5304a of title 

6 5, United States Code. 

7 (b) PAY PARITY AT JOINT BASES.—Whenever 2 or 

8 more military installations are reorganized or otherwise 

9 associated as a single joint military installation, but the 

10 constituent installations are not all located within the 

11 same pay locality, all employees of the respective installa12 tions constituting the joint installation (who are otherwise 

13 entitled to locality pay) shall receive locality pay at a uni14 form percentage equal to the percentage which is payable 

15 with respect to the locality which includes the constituent 

16 installation then receiving the highest locality pay (ex17 pressed as a percentage). 

18 (c) REGULATIONS.—The Office of Personnel Man19 agement shall prescribe regulations to carry out this sec20 tion. 

21 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICABILITY.— 

22 (1) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall be ef23 fective with respect to pay periods beginning on or 

24 after such date (not later than 1 year after the date 

25 of enactment of this Act) as the Secretary of DeVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:08 Jun 19, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2790.IH H2790

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2790 IH

1 fense shall determine in consultation with the Office 

2 of Personnel Management. 

3 (2) APPLICABILITY.—This section shall apply 

4 to joint military installations, whether so constituted 

5 before, on, or after the date of enactment of this 

6 Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS