alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 178 (Friday, September 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 74949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20921]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m. on September 17, 2024.

PLACE: This Board meeting will be open to public observation only by 
webcast. Visit https://www.fdic.gov/news/board-matters/video.html for a 
link to the webcast. FDIC Board Members and staff will participate from 
FDIC Headquarters, 550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC.
    Observers requiring auxiliary aids (e.g., sign language 
interpretation) for this meeting should email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#62260b1103000b0e0b161b32100d0510030f2204060b014c050d14"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eaae83998b888386839e93ba98858d988b87aa8c8e8389c48d859c">[email protected]</span></a> to make necessary arrangements.

STATUS: Open to public observation via webcast.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's 
Board of Directors will meet to consider the following matters:
    Discussion Agenda: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Custodial 
Deposit Accounts with Transaction Features and Prompt Payment of 
Deposit Insurance to Depositors.
    Final Statement of Policy on Bank Merger Transactions.
    Summary Agenda: No substantive discussion of the following items is 
anticipated. The Board will resolve these matters with a single vote 
unless a member of the Board of Directors requests that an item be 
moved to the discussion agenda.
    Minutes of a Board of Directors' Meeting Previously Distributed.
    Summary reports, status reports, and reports of actions taken 
pursuant to authority delegated by the Board of Directors.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Direct requests for further 
information concerning the meeting to Debra A. Decker, Executive 
Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b)

     Dated at Washington, DC, on September 10, 2024.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-20921 Filed 9-11-24; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### WICHITA ROYALTY CO. et al. v. CITY NAT. BANK OF WICHITA FALLS et al.

No. 6800.

Supreme Court of Texas.

April 8, 1936.

Kilgore & Rogers, J. T. Montgomery, and' Roy Bland, all of Wichita Falls, and Black & Graves, of Austin, for plaintiffs in error.

Weeks, Morrow & Francis, T. R. Boone, Boone & Duff, and Bullington, Humphrey & King, all of Wichita Falls, for defendants in error.

TAYLOR, Commissioner.

It is an open question upon another trial of the case within the principles of law stated in the opinion on original hearing whether the bank first acquired knowledge of Peckham’s dishonesty on November 17, 1925. This statement is made in view of the bank’s contention in its motion for rehearing with respect to the nature of the items constituting in the aggre*144gate the $5,500 transferred by Peckham from the trust account into his personal account on October 8, 1925. It is undisputed from the facts disclosed by the present record that such a transfer was made by him, and there is no evidence that a transfer of funds out of the trust account, into his personal account was made' at an earlier date. Nor is it contradicted in the evidence that the payment made by him on November 17, 1925, to be credited oh his personal indebtedness to .the bank was made from his personal account which then contained funds transferred thereto from the trust account on October 8, 1925. It is not intended by anything said in the original opinion, to foreclose upon another trial the question of whether the items contended by the bank to constitute the $5,-500 were used for authorized trust purposes; or to foreclose any purely fact finding that may be made from the evidence that may be adduced upon another trial. The suggestion in the original opinion that an audit should be made for use upon another trial, and the statement that the various sums therein referred to were not stated as finalities, were indicative of such intention. Th,e statement perhaps should have included a reference to the various dates. as well as sums. It is apparent from the undisputed evidence upon the former trial as to the date when Peck-ham began his system of transferring funds from the trust account to his personal account, that the suggested audit should take as its beginning point a date not later than .October 8, 1925. The principal ainT of the original opinion is to set forth the principles of law applicable upon another trial.

In view of the contention with respect to the character of the items claimed by the bank to make up the $5,500 in question, reference is made to the discussion in the opinion on original hearing of the terms of the declaration of trust, beginning 89 S.W.(2d) 394, at page 404, [7, 8]; and also to the principles of law set forth in the excerpt quoted from Steere v. Stockyards National Bank, 113 Tex. 387, 256 S.W. 586, 590, 258 S.W. 1042, cited in the original opinion, supra, at page 401 of 89 S.W.(2d).

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of Norwood Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Lewis J. Critelli, President and Chief Executive Officer, and William S. Lance, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Lewis J. Critelli

/s/ William S. LanceLewis J. Critelli

William S. LancePresident and Chief Executive Officer

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2011
#### ERWIN v. SHERROD et al.

No. 5125.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.

Aug. 2, 1939.

E. A. Bills, of Littlefield, for appellant.

Bean, Evans & Bean, of Lubbock, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appellees, B. Sherrod and Paul Sherrod, recovered judgment in the lower court against H. E. Chambers in the sum of $486.22, with interest and costs of suit, and for foreclosure of a chattel mortgage 'lien on 16 Maytag washing machines, situated in Lamb County, Texas, as against Chambers, Acrey Barton and the appellant herein,. C. G. Erwin, the latter having inter■vened in the suit seeking to establish a prior and superior lien upon the property mentioned. The appellant, having been denied the relief he sought in the trial court, gave notice of appeal, in due time made and filed a supersedeas bond in the amount and condition required by law, which bond was approved by the clerk of the trial court, and thereafter the record in the case was filed in this court.

' On July 19, 1939, after the appeal had been duly perfected and filed in this court, the appellees caused the clerk of the court below to issue an alias order of sale under the trial court judgment, commanding the sheriff or any constable of Lamb County, Texas, to seize and sell the 16 Maytag washing machines herein involved. The appellant thereupon filed in this court a petition for an injunction to restrain the execution of the order of sale, alleging that said alias order of sale had been placed in the hands of Sam Hutson, sheriff of Lamb County, and that such sheriff would sell such property unless restrained from so doing by this court. The appellees and the sheriff have entered their appearances herein for all purposes and the application of the appellant for injunctive relief' has been duly submitted for our consideration,'

Under the authorities of this State we think the filing of the supersedeas bond by the appellant herein supersedes and suspends the enforcement of the judgment below in so far as the sale of the property is concerned and the appellant is, therefore, entitled to the relief sought. Articles *757*2270*and 2275, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes of Texas; R. B. Spencer & Co. v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co., Tex.Civ.App., 84 S.W.2d 853; Adoue, et al. v. Wettermark, 28 Tex.Civ.App. 17, 68 S.W. 553, writ denied; Houtchens v. Mercer, District Judge, 119 Tex. 431, 29 S.W.2d 1031, 69 A.L.R. 1103.

The writ will issue against the appellees and the sheriff of Lamb County, as prayed for.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2608 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2608

To provide that a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy communication 
   plan may include information about Federal and State prescribing 
                requirements for controlled substances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2018

Ms. Warren (for herself and Mrs. Capito) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy communication 
   plan may include information about Federal and State prescribing 
                requirements for controlled substances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reducing Opioid Risk Act''.

SEC. 2. RISK EVALUATION AND MITIGATION STRATEGY COMMUNICATION PLANS.

    Section 505-1(e)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 355-1(e)(3)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by adding a semicolon at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``; or'' and inserting 
        a semicolon;
            (3) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(E) disseminating information to health care 
                providers about Federal and State prescribing 
                requirements for controlled substances, including the 
                requirements under section 309(f) of the Controlled 
                Substances Act, as applicable.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**P&F INDUSTRIES,INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of P&F Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard A. Horowitz,Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| March 30, 2007 |   | /s/ RICHARD A.  HOROWITZ    |
|---------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
| Date                |   | Richard A. Horowitz         |
|                |   | Principal Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          12,197
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             407
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                22,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    137,639
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        105,306
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 281,720
<DEPOSITS>                                     228,349
<SHORT-TERM>                                    32,836
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,306
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        500
<COMMON>                                           668
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,061
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 281,720
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,660
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,744
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   254
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,258
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,219
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,498
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,760
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,131
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    387
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         387
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       290
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.46
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,602
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,199
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  7,302
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,700
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       98
<RECOVERIES>                                       101
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,803
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,803
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
P. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1790 Prepped by Keeia Richards



## Document

Number: 

# 233 ) ll-F-2 3 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/31/2008 12:43:17

PM Sheet 233 of 250P. 2

SEN T BY*ASST . SECRETAR Y FW P : 3-21-9 5 :11:38A M : INTERIO R DEPARTMEN T 

# Unite dState s Departmen t ofth e Inierio r OFFIC EO FT l I

K SECRLTAIAY Washiugion . IW

T S02-1 0 TRANSMISSIO NNOTIC E SoM!?? 3a9 e u ? elect r°»icall ytransmitte d o n a XP.rn * Facsimil e machine . ' 1*3 3

Transmissio n Number : Verificatio n Number : 

### To : 202/208-468 4 202/208-665 5 Name : Agenc yPhon e Number : From : A/ S Staff * Member : 91 9 54 1 5509: * 1 / 2 

# IT

- P"-c? 3

Departmen to f

th e Interior. . Assistan tSecretar y fo rFi^ i an d Wildlif e an d Park s 184 9 "C " Stree tN . W . Mls-MIB-31Rf

i Washington , D.C . 2024 0 Numbe ro f

Page s t o follow :

Date : Time : 

# :_v f \jA 

# I . 

# TA^tZjJi^

< , ^ ^ ^



# .J 1 

# AP

R

# ' : o 

# m rTTTTZJ-..P. 3

SEN T BY*ASST . SECRETAR YFW P : 3-21-9 5 :11:38A M : INTERIORDEPARTMENT 

# U, 4. Significan t Imparl - Tns fl r t * Novembe r 16 , 1994 , draft ; Inser t following paragrap ha l pag e 329 . 91 9 54 1 5509: * 2 / 2

Althoug hthe FLM s (NPS/FWS ) agre e tha t th e us e significanc e level s wit hrespec t to Clas s I ma y b e appropriat e i ncertai ncircumstances , believ e tha t thes e level s ahoul db e prop * conservativ e an

dconsisten t wit hthe methodulig y originall y

use dt o establis hthe NAAQ S sigaif i level s (.se

e propose dsection s 51.166(b ) (23 ) (iv ) 52.21(h)( 2 3)(iv)) . Therefore , the NP S an dFW S develope dalternativ e significanc e level s b y takin g rati o o f the NAAQ S significanc e leve l r. o th e NAAQ S multiplyin g tha t numbe r b y the respectiv e r:i*e £ increment . Revis e las t paragrapho upag e 33 1 a a follows : incremnt e • qle y cfl i ic e in d 

## Hiv e h e ta d I

Th e EP A

request 8 publi c commen t onire e _$| i propdAe d Clas s I incremen t cignificonc c levels . I nparticula r ch e EP A

request s commen t o n^te hth e -level s prop e i ne 4 whie hare—fou r percen. t o f "tn e applicabl e Clao n incremen t level S »iiii^|iii|||| " ^&m^'V^'&-'a&>-1immZ'.'>iltaii>fl$i-tii». ii-t:^ " *M.<~-4*mhM V J.-.'.KtuV.. * NOTE : 1 sugges t KP A als o ad

da colum

nt o itction s 511166(b ) (23 ) (v ) an d52.21(b ) (23 ) (v) ) r.har . include s :h e FL M significanc e level s for comparison , or els e pu t bot hset s o f number s i nthe preamble . NPS/FW S number s ar e a s followf

Pollutan t 

### Sulfu r Dioxid e (SO. ) Particulat e Matte r

(PMin ) Nitroge nDioxid e (H0 2 ) Averagin g

Tim e Annua l 2ft-hou r 3-hour Annua l 24-hou r Annua l NPS/FW S

Propose d Level s 0.0 3 0.0 7 0.4 8 0.0 8 0.2 7 0.0 3 en

do f



### o f
----

|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |  |
| INDIANA                                        | 35-1544218 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

----

----

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   | Description |
| 99.1   | Press Release, dated July 25, 2013, issued by First Merchants Corporation |
| 99.2   | First Merchants Corporation Investor Information, July 30, 2013 |
EXHIBIT 32.2
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION *
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Dated April 14, 2010
    By:
    /s/ James A. McGradyJames A. McGrady, Chief Executive Officer,President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer) *
    
    This Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall
not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of
1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WellPoint Health Networks Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard D. Schaeffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|                                                                                   |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/LEONARD D. SCHAEFFERLeonard D. Schaeffer Chief Executive
OfficerAugust 13, 2002 |  | 

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 270 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 270

 To prohibit the use of premiums paid to the Pension Benefit Guaranty 
          Corporation as an offset for other Federal spending.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2017

  Mr. Enzi (for himself, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Portman, and Mr. Isakson) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                        Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the use of premiums paid to the Pension Benefit Guaranty 
          Corporation as an offset for other Federal spending.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pension and Budget Integrity Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF PREMIUMS AS AN OFFSET.

    (a) In General.--In the Senate and the House of Representatives, 
for purposes of determining points of order under the Congressional 
Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 621 et seq.) or any concurrent resolution 
on the budget, any provision that increases, or extends the increase 
of, any premiums payable to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 
shall not be counted in estimating the level of budget authority, 
outlays, or revenues--
            (1) in the Senate, for any bill, joint resolution, 
        amendment, amendment between the Houses, conference report, or 
        motion; or
            (2) in the House of Representatives, for any bill or joint 
        resolution, or amendment thereto or conference report thereon.
    (b) Rules of Senate and House of Representatives.--Congress adopts 
the provisions of this section--
            (1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the Senate 
        and the House of Representatives, respectively, and as such is 
        deemed a part of the rules of each House, respectively, and 
        supersede other rules only to the extent that they are 
        inconsistent with such rules; and
            (2) with full recognition of the constitutional right of 
        either House to change the rules (so far as relating to the 
        procedure of that House) at any time, in the same manner, and 
        to the same extent as in the case of any other rule of that 
        House.
                                 <all>
```
T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-12-00712- CV In re Sierr a Club ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM TRAVIS CO UNTY M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N P ER CURIAM

Relator’s pe tition for writ of injunction is denied. See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in Filed: De cembe r 14, 2012
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: K.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: R.B.

- P., GUARDIAN :

:

:

:

: No. 203 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of September, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.