alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE>                                            5
<CIK>                                       0001013277
<NAME>                    NETLIVE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,578,063
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,710,221
<PP&E>                                          83,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,929
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,851,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,718
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           265
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,732,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,851,522
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  303,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (50,904)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (354,620)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (354,620)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6
                         AMENDED SCHEDULE OF NHI LEASES
                  WHICH ARE SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM OF LEASE
                        ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT 10.57 TO THE
                           TO THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K
                         FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 12/31/98

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             LEASING          ORIGINAL NHI
                FACILITY NAME           LOCATION                         COMMITMENT FEE        INVESTMENT        ANNUAL BASE RENT
                -------------           --------                         --------------        ----------        ----------------

<S>                                     <C>                                <C>               <C>                   <C>
Sterling House of Gilbert               845 N. El Dorado Dr.               $ 35,926.80       $ 3,592,680.00        $ 341,304.60
                                        Gilbert, AZ 85233

Clare Bridge of Glendale                6735 W. Hillcrest Blvd.              42,108.62          4,210,862.00         400,031.89
                                        Glendale, AZ 85310

Sterling House of Tuscon (West)         2650 W. Ina Road                     33,566.17          3,356,617.00         318,878.61
                                        Tuscon, AZ 85741

Sterling Cottage of Daytona Beach       570 National Healthcare Blvd.        29,886.15          2,988,615.00         283,918.42
                                        Daytona Beach, FL 32114

Clare Bridge of Maitland                760 N. Wymore Road                  113,372.54         11,337,254.00       1,077,039.10*
Wynwood of Maitland                     Maitland, FL 32751

Sterling House of Conway                872 Singleton Ridge Road             32,206.37          3,220,637.00         305,960.51
                                        Conway, SC 29526

Sterling House of Kingsport             2424 N. John B. Dennis Hwy.          29,217.36          2,921,736.00         277,564.92
                                        Kingsport, TN 37660

Sterling House of Gallatin              400 Hancock Road                     26,053.40          2,605,340.00         247,507.30
                                        Gallatin, TN 37066

Sterling House of Tullahoma             108 Wilson Avenue                    24,076.52          2,407,652.00         228,726.94
                                        Tullahoma, TN 37388

Clare Bridge of Tanque Verde            9050 East Tanque Verde Road          42,189.42          4,218,942.00         400,799.49
                                        Tucson, AZ  85749
</TABLE>

*     Clare Bridge of Maitland - $418,976.03; Wynwood of Maitland - $658,063.10.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2780 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the two-year 

waiting period for divorced spouse’s benefits following the divorce. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2015 

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

the two-year waiting period for divorced spouse’s benefits 

following the divorce. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM TWO-YEAR WAITING PERIOD 

4 FOR DIVORCED SPOUSE’S BENEFITS FOL5 LOWING THE DIVORCE IN CASES OF PRIOR 

6 RECEIPT OF SPOUSE’S BENEFITS. 

7 (a) WIFE’S INSURANCE BENEFITS.—Section 

8 202(b)(4)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 402(b)(4)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘divorced wife—’’ 

10 and all that follows through ‘‘shall be entitled’’ and insertVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:12 Jun 18, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2780.IH H2780

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2780 IH

1 ing ‘‘divorced wife meets the requirements of subpara2 graphs (A) through (D) of paragraph (1), shall be enti3 tled’’. 

4 (b) HUSBAND’S INSURANCE BENEFITS.—Section 

5 202(c)(4)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 402(c)(4)(A)) is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘divorced husband—’’ and all that 

7 follows through ‘‘shall be entitled’’ and inserting ‘‘divorced 

8 husband meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A) 

9 through (D) of paragraph (1), shall be entitled’’. 

10 (c) EXEMPTION FROM DEDUCTIONS ON ACCOUNT OF

11 WORK.—Section 203(b)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

12 403(b)(2)) is amended— 

13 (1) by striking ‘‘(2)(A) Except as’’ and all that 

14 follows through ‘‘the benefit to which’’ and inserting 

15 the following: ‘‘(2) In any case in which any of the 

16 other persons referred to in paragraph (1)(B) are 

17 entitled to monthly benefits as a divorced spouse 

18 under subsection (b) or (c) of section 202 for any 

19 month, the benefit to which’’; and 

20 (2) by striking subparagraph (B). 

21 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

22 The amendments made by section 1 shall apply with 

23 respect to benefits for months after the date of the enact24 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Order entered November 15, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00223-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.G.C.G., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-10-21940

ORDER

On the Court’s own motion, we REMOVE this appeal from submission on December 

12, 2018. The appeal will be resubmitted in the first quarter of 2019.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
Exhibit 32

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18            U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS            ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In            connection with the Quarterly Report of Norwood Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form            10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange            Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, William W. Davis, Jr., President and            Chief Executive Officer, and Lewis J. Critelli, Executive Vice President and Chief            Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to            Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)       The Report fully complies            with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;            and

 

(2)       The information contained            in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and            results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

| /s/William W. Davis, Jr.              |   | /s/Lewis J. Critelli                                                            |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| William W. Davis, Jr.                 |   | Lewis J. Critelli                                                               |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial                            Officer |   |

 

 

 

May            12, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>

Exhibit 27
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SBI COMMUNICATIONS,
INC. FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

     <S>                               <C>
     <PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
     <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
     <PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-2000
     <CASH>                                            71,580
     <SECURITIES>                                           0
     <RECEIVABLES>                                          0
     <ALLOWANCES>                                           0
     <INVENTORY>                                            0
     <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,140,080
     <PP&E>                                         3,940,000
     <DEPRECIATION>                                         0
     <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,140,716
     <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,322,879
     <BONDS>                                        1,200,000
     <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
     <PREFERRED>                                      765,000
     <COMMON>                                           5,870
     <OTHER-SE>                                     1,696,201
     <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,019,080
     <SALES>                                                0
     <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
     <CGS>                                                  0
     <TOTAL-COSTS>                                    115,420
     <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
     <LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
     <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               229,000
     <INCOME-PRETAX>                                        0
     <INCOME-TAX>                                           0
     <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
     <DISCONTINUED>                                         0
     <EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
     <CHANGES>                                              0
     <NET-INCOME>                                    (145,920)
     <EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.02)
     <EPS-DILUTED>                                          0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

I, John
McDermott, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: July 30, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John McDermott                   
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | John McDermott                       
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification
accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
SCPW-15-0000725

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

EMERSON M.F. JOU, M.D., Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE GARY W.B. CHANG, Judge of the Circuit Court 

of the First Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,

and 

HEMIC, aka Hawaii Employers Medical Insurance Company, 

an Entity, Form Unknown, Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CIVIL NO. 09-1-1529-07)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION

OR FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT

(By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, J.J.,

and Circuit Judge Alm, in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused)

Upon consideration of petitioner Emerson M.F. Jou,

M.D.’s petition for a writ of prohibition or for a supervisory

writ, filed on October 7, 2015, the documents attached thereto

and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that

petitioner’s case is not one in which the question of

disqualification cannot otherwise be reviewed and immediate

review by way of a writ of prohibition is not warranted. 

Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to the relief requested. 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-15-0000725

25-NOV-2015

02:25 PM
See Peters v. Jamieson, 48 Haw. 247, 257, 397 P.2d 575, 582

(1964) (“[A] writ of prohibition will lie to compel a trial judge

to recuse him[] or [her]self because of bias or prejudice which

appears from the record, where . . . the case is one in which the

question of disqualification cannot otherwise be reviewed.”). 

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

prohibition is denied. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 25, 2015. 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Steven S. Alm

2
za` qE4 87

- ,J rFs G' 'Z tStJl'fED STA'tES ENV1ROPlMEN°fAL PRO°rEC'CiON AGEtdCY Z Q WASFiINGTON, D.C. 20480

~ Q
PROt`v OS ~



### AP ft 1 0 2007 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION

David Moody, Ph.D., Manager Carlsbad Field Office Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221
Dear Dr. Moody:
We received your letter dated March 28, 2007, requesting the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the revised draft recertification letter you plan to issue to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Savannah River Site (SRS). Your request is in accordance with the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) procedures that are intended to ensure that the Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolafion Pilot Plant (WIPP) site certifications correlate appropriately with EPA approvals for waste characterization activities at DOE transuranic (TRU) waste generator sites.
The scope of the DOE audit conducted in October 2006 (CBFO Audit A-07-01 aud A-07-02) covered characterization activities for contact-handled (CH), retrievably-stored and newlygenerated soilslgravel (S4000), and debris waste (S5000). EPA independently conducted a baseline inspection of SRS CCP's TRU waste characterization program (EPA-SRS-CCP-10.05- 08) for compliance with EPA regulations. On July 10, 2006, EPA issued a final inspection report and a letter approving the SRS CCP waste characterization program (EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49, Item II-A4-64). Subsequent to that baseline approval, EPA has received and reviewed tiering reports covering the waste characterization program implemented by CCP at SRS and have found all cbanges made to be acceptable. EPA concurs that the waste characterization equipment, procedures and waste streams encompassed in DOE's draft recertifieation letter comport with all of EPA's existing approvals for contact-handled waste at SRS-CCP.

IntemetAdsress(URL)s httpdtwvm.epa.gov i3ecyc3e67Recy€'.able s Printed wfih Vege*.a61e Oi; EaseG inks on 100% Pestconsumer, Process Ch!orine Ftee RecycieC PaperThank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft recertification letter

for SRS-CCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343- 

### 9422. 

# S~ ely, 

# A

--- )
Juan Reyes, Director Radiation Protection Division

cc: Electronic Distribution Lloyd Piper, CBFO Vernon Daub, CBFO Courtland Fesmire, CBFO Ava Holland, CBFO Norma Castaneda, CBFO Martin Navarrete, CBFO Dennis Miehls, CBFO Allison Pringle, CTAC Wayne Ledford, CTAC Steve Zappe, NMED
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### APR 21 1999 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
ATHENS CARL McLAUGHLIN,

Petitioner - Appellant, No. 98-1338 v. (D. Colorado) UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, FCI FLORENCE, WARDEN BROOKS,

Respondents - Appellees. (D.C. No. 96-WM-359)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before ANDERSON , KELLY , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). T he case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

Athens Carl McLaughlin, as a prisoner of the UnitedStates, unsuccessfully challenged his parole date in the district court. He then appealed to this court by notice of appeal dated August 31, 1998. He was rel eased on parole on January 28, 1999. His release on parole moots his challenge to his parole date. See Vandenburg v. Rodgers , 801 F.2d 377, 378 (10th Cir. 1986). DISMISSED. ENTERED FOR THE COURT
Stephen H. Anderson Circuit Judge
# C_2022423EN.01001201.xml

| 7.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/12

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10433 – VIVENDI / LAGARDERE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 423/07)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Vivendi SE (‘Vivendi’, France), controlled by the Bolloré Group, |
| --- | --- |

—

Vivendi SE (‘Vivendi’, France), controlled by the Bolloré Group,

| — | Lagardère S.A. (‘Lagardère’, France). |
| --- | --- |

—

Lagardère S.A. (‘Lagardère’, France).

Vivendi acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Lagardère.

The concentration is accomplished by way of public bid announced on 21 February 2022.

2.

| — | Vivendi is a media group, mainly active in the publishing, free-to-air and pay-TV, provision of advertising space purchasing services and advertising, press, supply and hosting of video content on the Internet and performing arts sectors, chiefly in France, |
| --- | --- |

—

Vivendi is a media group, mainly active in the publishing, free-to-air and pay-TV, provision of advertising space purchasing services and advertising, press, supply and hosting of video content on the Internet and performing arts sectors, chiefly in France,

| — | Lagardère is a group mainly active in the publishing, travel retail, broadcasting, press and media (including advertising), performing arts and entertainment sectors, chiefly in France. |
| --- | --- |

—

Lagardère is a group mainly active in the publishing, travel retail, broadcasting, press and media (including advertising), performing arts and entertainment sectors, chiefly in France.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission no later than 10 days following the date on which this notification is published. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10433 – VIVENDI / LAGARDERE

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
# U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t o f A p p e a l s FOR TH E DISTRICT OF COL UMBIA CIRCUIT


## N o. 1 1-704 3 Septe mber Ter m, 2011 FILED ON: JULY 25, 2012

1:10-c v-00519 Elli Bern Angellino, Appellan t

v. Royal F am ily Al-Sau d et al.,

Appellees BEFORE : H E

N D E R S ON , R O GE R S and K A V A N A U GH , Circuit Judges

. O R D E R
I t is ORDERED by

the cour t that the opinion filed by the cour t on J une 5, 2012 be amende d as follows: On pag e 7, line 25, re place “with the Roy al Fa

mily ” with “on the King dom of Saudi Arabia or a political subdivision thereof ” On pag es 7-8, f

ootnote 6, line 7 (on pag e 8), inser t “ag ainst the individual defenda nts” betwee n “ac tion” and “ ‘ should.’ ” On pag e 9, line 13, re place “def endant Roy al Fa

mily ” with “King dom of Saudi Arabia ” On pag e 9, lines 16-18, r eplac e“suit ag ainst Roy al Fa mily as suit ag ainst King dom of Saudi Arabia or one of its political subdivisi ons” with “pro se complaint to seek re lief fr om both Kingdom of Saudi Ar abia, or political subdivision t here of, and individual def endants” On pag e 9, line 18, add the following footnote 7 af ter “ supra note 6."
To be clear, we ex press no opini on whether the Roy al Family is equivalent to 7 t h e Ki ng dom of Saudi Ara bia or a political subdivision there of. We unders t an d Ang ellino’s complaint to seek relief from, inter alia , the King dom of Saudi Ara bia or a political subdivision there of, service of which is g overne d by section 1608(a)

. See Appellant’s Br

. at 18-20 (ac tion “[was] [b] roug ht [a] g ainst the De fenda nts as [a] For eig n State”); Erickson v. Pardus , 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2 0 0 7 ) (p ro se filing “is to be liberally construed” (quotation marks omitted)). On pag e 9, lines 20-21, de lete “on the defe ndant Roy al Fa mily ” On pag e 10, line 11, re place “Roy al Fa

mily members” with “King dom of Saudi Arabia ” On pag e 13, lines 23-24, r eplac e “def endant Roy al Fa

mily ” with “King dom of Saudi Arabia ”
P E R C U R

I AM F OR THE COURT: Mark J. L ang er, Cler

k
BY : /s/ J ennife r M. Clark Deputy Clerk