alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.2





Certification
of Principal Accounting Officer


Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)


of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended





I,
William P. Stelt, Chief Financial Officer of Firepond, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify that:





1.
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three
months ended September 30, 2008;


2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;


4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:


a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b)
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;


c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):


a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal  control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and


b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.







Firepond, Inc.Date: 
      November 12, 2008
              By:
              /s/ William
      P. SteltWilliam
      P. SteltChief
      Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2553 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2553

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 5, 2018

 Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
   the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit health 
 plans and pharmacy benefit managers from restricting pharmacies from 
   informing individuals regarding the prices for certain drugs and 
                              biologicals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Know the Lowest Price Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LIMITING CERTAIN INFORMATION ON DRUG PRICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1860D-4 of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395w-104) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(m) Prohibition on Limiting Certain Information on Drug Prices.--
A PDP sponsor and a Medicare Advantage organization shall ensure that 
each prescription drug plan or MA-PD plan offered by the sponsor or 
organization does not restrict a pharmacy that dispenses a prescription 
drug or biological from informing, nor penalize such pharmacy for 
informing, an enrollee in such plan of any differential between the 
negotiated price of, or copayment or coinsurance for, the drug or 
biological to the enrollee under the plan and a lower price the 
individual would pay for the drug or biological if the enrollee 
obtained the drug without using any health insurance coverage.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2020.

            Passed the Senate September 4, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
# C_2022363EN.01000101.xml

| 22.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10719 – PGGM / DIF / FUDURA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 363/01)

On 3 August 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10719. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10719. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
|    |                                                                                                                            |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Electronic Arts Inc. for the periods presented therein. |

|                           |
|---------------------------|
|                           |
| /s/ Blake Jorgensen       |
| Blake Jorgensen           |
| Executive Vice President, |
| Chief Financial Officer   |
| Electronic Arts Inc.      |
|                      |
| November 8, 2016          |
Upper Columbia (1702)

Puget Sound (1711)

Yakima (1703) Lower Snake (1706)

Middle Columbia (1707)

Lower Columbia (1708)

Oregon-Washington Coastal (1710)

Kootenai-Pend Oreille-Spokane (1701)

±

Oregon

Washington Waters

that Flow into Oregon

via the Columbia River

0 1.5 3 6 Miles

Washington

Idaho

Montana

0 50 100 200 Miles

For explanation of analysis, please see Calculation Summary.

Legend

Main Washington Watersheds

(Hydrologic Unit Code 4)

Washington Waters that do not flow into Oregon via the Columbia River

Washington Waters that flow into Oregon via the Columbia River

State Boundary

Streams

Columbia River

Detailed streams

Major streams
EX-10.3






Exhibit 10.3




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE HAMILTON BEACH BRANDS, INC.

UNFUNDED BENEFIT PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective as of December 1, 2007)




          Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. hereby adopts this Amendment No. 1 to the Hamilton Beach Brands,
Inc. Unfunded Benefit Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective as of December 1, 2007) (the “Plan”),
to be effective as of January 1, 2008. Words used herein with initial capital letters which are
defined in the Plan are used herein as so defined.




Section 1




          Article VI of the Plan is hereby amended by adding a new Section 6.6 to the end thereof, to
read as follows:




          “SECTION 6.6. Additional Payments.





     (a) At the time described in clause (b) of this Section 6.6, the Company shall pay to the
Participant who is a Covered Employee (i) an amount equal to the positive difference, if any, of
I minus II (the “Income Tax Payment”), plus (ii) an additional amount such that, after payment
by the Participant of all applicable federal, state and local income taxes and employment (e.g.,
FICA) taxes on the Income Tax Payment, the Participant will retain an amount equal to the Income
Tax Payment (the “Gross-Up Payment”). For purposes of this Section 6.6:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	I
	 	=
	 	The Participant’s federal, state and local income tax and
employment (e.g., FICA) tax liability with respect to the payment of the
amounts described in Section 6.4(a)(i) (his “Frozen Account Balance”); and
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	II
	 	=
	 	The amount of federal, state and local income tax
employment (e.g., FICA) tax liability the Participant would have incurred with
respect to the payment of the Participant’s Frozen Account Balance if the
Frozen Account Balance had been paid to the Participant during the 2008 Plan
Year.







For purposes of calculating the amounts described in I and II above and determining the Gross-Up
Payment, the Participant will be considered to pay (A) federal income taxes at the highest rate
in effect in the applicable year and (B) state and local income taxes at the highest rate in
effect in the state or locality in which the applicable payment would be subject to state or
local tax, net of the maximum reduction in federal income tax that could be obtained from
deduction of such state and local taxes. All determinations required to be made under this
Section 6.6 shall be made by the Company, after receiving applicable information from the
Participant.



1









 






     (b) The payment described in paragraph (a) of this Section 6.6 shall be made at the same
time as the payment described in
Section 6.4(a)(i).”



EXECUTED this 11th day of November, 2008.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	HAMILTON BEACH BRANDS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
Charles A. Bittenbender	 
	 	Title: 	Assistant Secretary	 
	 	 	 	 
	 




2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6292

GARY N. MCNAMARA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARTIN P. WASSERMAN, Individually and in his

capacity as Secretary for the Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene; MARY K.

NOREN, Individually and in her capacity as

Superintendent for the Eastern Shore Hospital

Center; DAVID WILLIAMSON, Doctor, Individually

and in his capacity as Director of Forensic

Psychiatry for the Eastern Shore Hospital

Center; JOEL J. TODD, in his official and

administrative capacities as State's Attorney

for Worcester County, Maryland; ALL KNOWN AND

UNKNOWN PERSONS AS SET FORTH IN THE JOINDER OF

THE COMPLAINT; RICHARD ECKARDT, Social Worker

Eastern Shore Hospital Center; BURTON ANDERSON, Public Defender Service; PAUL L. STONE,

Rights Advisor Eastern Shore Hospital Center;

CINDY BASIL, Charge Nurse, Eastern Shore Hospital Center; WALTER GUMBY, Assistant Public

Defender Service, RAUL LOPEZ, Doctor, Psychiatrist, Eastern Shore Hospital Center; RUSSELL

P. SMITH, JR., Doctor, Dentist, Eastern Shore

Hospital Center; MARTIN BRANDES, Doctor,

Psychiatrist, Eastern Shore Hospital Center;

ANITA EARP ROBINSON, Honorable, Administrative

Law Judge,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95-

2907-AMD)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 31, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Gary N. McNamara, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Baltimore Maryland; Susan Renee Steinberg, MARYLAND

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & MENTAL HYGIENE, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action. All but four

of Appellants' claims were dismissed without prejudice. Because

such dismissals are generally not appealable, we dismiss the appeal

regarding these claims. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers

Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).

Three of Appellant's remaining claims were dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988), and Appellant's last

claim was dismissed after summary judgment was granted to the only

remaining Defendant. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm the dismissal of the remaining claims on the reasoning of

the district court. McNamara v. Wasserman, No. CA-95-2907-AMD (D.

Md. Oct. 24, 1995, & Feb. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART
Exhibit
        10.37a

      


      AMENDMENT
        TO 

      6%
        PROMISSORY NOTE

      


      AMENDMENT
        TO 6% PROMISSORY NOTE, is dated as of September
        2, 2008;
        made by
        and between Delta Mutual, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with its principal
        offices located at 111 North Branch Street, Sellersville, PA 18960 (the
“Company”) and Egani, Inc., an Arizona corporation, (the “Lender”) with a
        mailing address of 8260 East Raintree Drive, Scottsdale, AZ 85260. Capitalized
        terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning
        assigned to such term in the Original Note.

      


      WHEREAS,
        the Company and the Lender are parties to that certain 6% Promissory Note,
        dated
        March 6, 2008 (the “Original Note”), pursuant to which the Company has borrowed
        the amount of $21,000
        from the
        Lender; 

      


      WHEREAS,
        the Original Note provides that the Maturity Date shall be September 6, 2008;
        and

      


      WHEREAS,
        the Company and the Lender have agreed to extend the Maturity Date and to
        amend
        Section 1.4 of the Original Note; and

      


      WHEREAS,
        in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Original Note, the Company
        and the Lender hereby approve the amendment of the Original Note as set forth
        herein.

      


      NOW,
        THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants contained
        herein, the parties agree as follows:

      


      1. By
        their respective execution of this AMENDMENT, the Company and the Lender
        agree that Section 1.4 of the Original Note is hereby amended to read in
        its
        entirety as follows: “Maturity
        Date”
        shall
        mean November
        30, 2008; and

      


      2.
         Except
        as
        expressly provided herein, the Original Note shall continue in full force
        and
        effect.

      


      3.  This
        AMENDMENT may be executed by facsimile and in counterparts, which, taken
        together, shall be deemed an original and shall constitute a single
        AMENDMENT.

      


      IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Lender have caused this AMENDMENT to
        be
        executed as of the date first written above.

       

      
        	
                DELTA
                  MUTUAL, INC.

              	 	
                EGANI,
                  INC.

              
	
                (COMPANY)

              	 	
                (LENDER)

              
	 	 	 	 	 
	
                By:

              	
                /s/
                  Malcolm W. Sherman

              	 	
                By:

              	
                /s/
                  Daniel Peralta

              
	 	
                Malcolm
                  W. Sherman

              	 	 	
                Daniel
                  Peralta

              
	 	
                Executive
                  Vice President

              	 	 	
                President
Exhibit 10(j)
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO
PARKER DRILLING COMPANY
2005 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
     The final sentence of Section 2.4 of the Plan is hereby superseded in its entirety and
replaced as follows:
  The final two sentences of Section 7.6(a) of the Plan are hereby superseded in their entirety
and replaced as follows:
  Section 7.6(c) of the Plan is supplemented by the addition of the following new sentence to
the end thereof:
 Section 7.6(c)




---



##### 



The Plan is hereby amended by the addition of the following new Section 8.19 as follows:
 8.19 Six-month Delay
  The Plan is hereby amended by the addition of the following new Section 8.20 as follows:
 8.20 Compliance with Code Section 409A




---



##### 



As expressly amended hereby, the Plan is ratified and confirmed in all respects and shall
continue in full force and effect.
   By:
    
    /s/ Ronald C. PotterName:
    
    Ronald C. PotterTitle:
    
    Vice President & General Counsel
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Paradise, Inc. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Jack M. Laskowitz                 |                                              |   |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jack M. Laskowitz                     |                                              |
| Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | Date:  March 30, 2011    |

----
# C_2022218EN.01000701.xml

| 2.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 218/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 218/7

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10765 – KKR / OTPP / HIGHWAYS TRUST)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 218/05)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | KKR & Co. Inc. (‘KKR’, United States), |
| --- | --- |

—

KKR & Co. Inc. (‘KKR’, United States),

| — | Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board (‘OTPP’, Canada), |
| --- | --- |

—

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board (‘OTPP’, Canada),

| — | Highways Infrastructure Trust (‘Highways Trust’, India), controlled by KKR. |
| --- | --- |

—

Highways Infrastructure Trust (‘Highways Trust’, India), controlled by KKR.

KKR and OTPP will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Highways Trust.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | KKR is a global investment firm that offers alternative asset management and capital markets and insurance solutions worldwide. |
| --- | --- |

—

KKR is a global investment firm that offers alternative asset management and capital markets and insurance solutions worldwide.

| — | OTPP administrates pension benefits and the investment of pension plan assets of active and retired teachers in the Canadian province of Ontario worldwide. |
| --- | --- |

—

OTPP administrates pension benefits and the investment of pension plan assets of active and retired teachers in the Canadian province of Ontario worldwide.

| — | Highways Trust is an infrastructure investment trust which holds companies active in the design, finance, construction, operation and maintenance of roads in India. |
| --- | --- |

—

Highways Trust is an infrastructure investment trust which holds companies active in the design, finance, construction, operation and maintenance of roads in India.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10765 – KKR / OTPP / HIGHWAYS TRUST

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---