alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SECTION OF THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,058,033
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          38,702
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        48,323
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,145,058
<COMMON>                                        85,474
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      192,717
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             68,818
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 347,009
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           467,559
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 104,521
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     15,899
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   456
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 209,614
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,145,058
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      235,252
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            35,739
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      99,666
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     135,405
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         99,847
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               3,394
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 103,241
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        42,959
<NET-INCOME>                                    60,282
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   60,282
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       145,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       29,450
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         123,344
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   60,282
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   60,282
        

</TABLE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON SCHEDULES


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Acceptance Insurance Companies Inc. and Subsidiaries


We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Acceptance Insurance
Companies Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, and have issued our
report thereon dated March 9, 2001; such financial statements and report are
included elsewhere in your 2000 Annual Report to Stockholders and are
incorporated herein by reference.  Our audits also included the financial
statement schedules of Acceptance Insurance Companies Inc. and subsidiaries,
listed in Item 14.  These financial statement schedules are the responsibility
of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audits.  In our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as
a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.





/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
March 9, 2001
#### LEE v. STATE.

No. 15501.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 4, 1933.

H. F. Lewis, of Lampasas, and G. A. Walters, of San Saba, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, fifteen months in the penitentiary.

 This ease must- be reversed for a violation of the provisions of articles 671, 673, 676 and 677, C. C. P., all relating to communications made to a jury in the trial of a felony case. While deliberating on this case, the jury became disturbed about the charge, and requested the sheriff to procure the judge so they could submit the matter to him. Being unable to find the judge, the sheriff came into the jury room and so reported. He was informed that two of the jurors did not understand the charge, and that they held out that there had been no proof of any sale of whisky by appellant. The sheriff, according to juror Townsend, said: “Probably I can answer that question,” and further: “He said John Lee was not charged with selling intoxicating liquor; he was only charged with possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale.” In the language of juror Rosson: “Some of the hoys (referring to members of the jury) I reckon spoke to Mr. Harvey, and he came back and said he might help some on that charge we had there. He said the charge said he was charged with the possession, not for selling. I heard him say that.” As said by juror Fields: “He said he might help them a little, — that is if it referred to the charge. * * * He said he wasn’t indicted for selling it.” Again this juror said: “Mr. Harvey referred the jury to the charge in which the court had submitted the law of the case, and also stated what the indictment was charging the defendant with.” Juror Croft swore: “The information he gave us was that Mr. Lee was n!>t charged with selling whisky, but he was charged of having whisky in his possession.” Other jurors gave substantially the same testimony. This conduct ■ seems plainly violative of the articles of our statute above referred to. See, also, Osborne v. State, 93 Tex. Cr. R. 54, 245 S. W. 928. Any instruction to the jury regarding the law of the case must be given in open court and in writing. The sheriff has no right to verbally instruct the jury how to feconeile conflicting views among them or as to the law of the case.. We have not the slightest doubt of the perfect sincerity and honesty of purpose of the officer in this case in what he did and said, but the privacy of a jury room where a jury is deliberating upon a case involving liberty or life is sacred, as is also the requirement of the law that the jury can only -seek a way out of their differences as to the charge of the court by the path pointed out by statute; i. e. by a proper instruction from the judge in open court upon their request to him for further instruction.

For the error above mentioned, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2554 

To ensure that health insurance issuers and group health plans do not 

prohibit pharmacy providers from providing certain information to enrollees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2018 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mr. BARRASSO, Ms. STABENOW, 

and Mr. CASSIDY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To ensure that health insurance issuers and group health 

plans do not prohibit pharmacy providers from providing 

certain information to enrollees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patient Right to Know 

5 Drug Prices Act’’. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2554 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LIMITING CERTAIN INFORMATION 

2 ON DRUG PRICES. 

3 (a) EXCHANGE PLANS.—Section 1311(e) of the Pa4 tient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 18031(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(4) INFORMATION ON PRESCRIPTION

7 DRUGS.—The Exchange shall require health plans 

8 seeking certification as qualified health plans to en9 sure that— 

10 ‘‘(A) the health insurance issuer does not 

11 restrict any pharmacy that dispenses a pre12 scription drug to an enrollee in the plan from 

13 informing (or penalize such pharmacy for in14 forming) an enrollee of any differential between 

15 the price of the drug to the enrollee under the 

16 plan and the price the individual would pay for 

17 the drug if the enrollee obtained the drug with18 out using any health insurance coverage; and 

19 ‘‘(B) any entity that provides pharmacy 

20 benefits management services under a contract 

21 with any such health plan does not, with re22 spect to such plan or any health benefits plan 

23 that the entity contracts with to provide phar24 macy benefits management services and that is 

25 offered by an entity other than such sponsor or 

26 organization, restrict a pharmacy that dispenses 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2554 IS

1 a prescription drug from informing (or penalize 

2 such pharmacy for informing) an enrollee of 

3 any differential between the price of the drug to 

4 the enrollee under the plan and the price the in5 dividual would pay for the drug if the enrollee 

6 obtained the drug without using any health in7 surance coverage.’’. 

8 (b) OTHER HEALTH PLANS.—The provisions of sec9 tion 1311(e)(4) of the Patient Protection and Affordable 

10 Care Act (as added by subsection (a)) shall apply to all 

11 health insurance issuers with respect to health insurance 

12 coverage and to all group health plans (as such terms are 

13 defined in section 2791 of the Public Health Service Act 

14 (42 U.S.C. 300gg–91)). 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21047]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free Phone 
Lines Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free 
Phone Lines Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This 
meeting will be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, October 10, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelvin Johnson at 1-888-912-1227 or 
504-202-9679.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone 
Lines Project Committee will be held Thursday, October 10, 2024, at 4 
p.m. eastern time. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and 
structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Kelvin Johnson. For more information, please contact Kelvin 
Johnson at 1-888-912-1227 or 504-202-9679, or write TAP Office, 1555 
Poydras Street, Suite 12, New Orleans, LA 70112 or contact us at the 
website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include TAP 2024 
committee project focus areas.

    Dated: September 9, 2024.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2024-21047 Filed 9-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, October 10, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jose Cintron-Santiago at 1-888-912-1227 or 787-522-8607.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be held Thursday, October 10, 2024, at 1 p.m. eastern time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Jose Cintron-Santiago. For more information, please contact Jose Cintron-Santiago at 1-888-912-1227 or 787-522-8607, or write TAP Office, 48 Carr 165 Suite 2000, Guaynabo, PR 00968-8000 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include TAP 2024 committee project focus areas.                

Dated: September 9, 2024.

Shawn Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2024-21046 Filed 9-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00354-CV

Luz CHAVEZ, Individually, as Representative of the Estates of Rudolph Chavez Sr., Deceased, 

and Rudolph Chavez Jr., Deceased, and as Next Friend of Joel Chavez, a Minor; Darlene 

Chavez; Allen Chavez; Francisco Chavez; and Celia Chavez,

Appellants

v.

KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and Jose Juarez,

Appellees

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007-CVE-000347-D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. 

It is ordered that appellees Kansas City Southern Railway Company and Jose Juarez 

recover their costs of this appeal from appellants Luz Chavez, Individually, as Representative of 

the Estates of Rudolph Chavez Sr., Deceased, and Rudolph Chavez Jr., Deceased, and as Next 

Friend of Joel Chavez, a Minor; Darlene Chavez; Allen Chavez; Francisco Chavez; and Celia 

Chavez. 

SIGNED June 17, 2015.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21100]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-22-2024]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 12; Authorization of Production 
Activity; Uni Ag Group, LLC; (Bulk Premixes); McAllen, Texas

    On May 15, 2024, The McAllen Foreign Trade Zone Inc., grantee of 
FTZ 12, submitted a notification of proposed export production activity 
to the FTZ Board on behalf of Uni Ag Group, LLC, within FTZ 12 in 
McAllen, Texas.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (89 FR 44631, May 21, 2024). On 
September 12, 2024, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this 
time. The export-only production activity described in the notification 
was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, 
including section 400.14.

    Dated: September 12, 2024.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-21100 Filed 9-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     We have issued our report dated March 15, 2000, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements of Oshman's Sporting Goods, Inc. and
Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
January 29, 2000. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
reports in the Registration Statements of Oshman's Sporting Goods, Inc. on Form
S-8, File No. 33-14665, File No. 33-41404, File No. 33-28357, File No. 33-53451,
File No. 33-54221 and File No. 33-64515.




/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP



Houston, Texas
April 27, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANICAL STATEMENTS OF ICG COMMUNICATIONS,  INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AS RESTATED TO REFLECT THE COMBINED
OPERATIONS  OF ICG AND NETCOM AS THOUGH THE MERGER  OCCURRED AT THE BEGINNING OF
THE PERIOD  PRESENTED  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                              433,342
<SECURITIES>                         33,450
<RECEIVABLES>                        53,319
<ALLOWANCES>                          3,411
<INVENTORY>                           3,309
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    527,712
<PP&E>                              567,697
<DEPRECIATION>                       79,648
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,113,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               112,465
<BONDS>                             761,504
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               159,120
<PREFERRED>                            0<F1>
<COMMON>                              8,189
<OTHER-SE>                           70,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      1,113,767
<SALES>                                0<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     93,335
<CGS>                                  0<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        72,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     59,740
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      1,190
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   24,454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (56,313)
<INCOME-TAX>                             12
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (61,313)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0<F1>
<CHANGES>                              0<F1>
<NET-INCOME>                        (61,313)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (1.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>THIS VALUE IS NOT APPLICABLE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                            9093
<SECURITIES>                                       511
<RECEIVABLES>                                    20304
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3790
<INVENTORY>                                      48495
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 89587
<PP&E>                                           67118
<DEPRECIATION>                                   35470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  129699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            62245
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           127
<OTHER-SE>                                       23312
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    129699
<SALES>                                         429786
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                437221
<CGS>                                           249592
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   133977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    88
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  53187
<INCOME-TAX>                                     20739
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              32448
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     32448
<EPS-BASIC>                                     2.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.99



</TABLE>
#### CHOATE v. STATE.

No. 18428.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 17, 1936.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 21, 1936.

*190C. A. Holloway, of Clarksville, and R. E. Eubank, of Paris, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of •Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The indictment under which appellant was tried and convicted charges the offense of sodomy, and contains. averments showing that he has been previously convicted of two felonies less than capital. Because of repetition of offenses, the penalty assessed was confinement in the state penitentiary for life.

Appellant’s first contention is that the court erred in not granting him a postponement of his trial until his attorneys, R. E. Eubank and PI. L. Jones, arrived. The court qualified said bill of exception, and in his qualification certifies that said attorneys had not advised the court they represented defendant, never appeared at any time during the trial, did not file any motion for a new trial, have never advised the court they had any connection with the case. The bill as thus explained by the court’s qualification fails to show any error.

By bill of exception No. 2 appellant complains of the action of the court in appointing a person who was not an official court reporter to report and transcribe the testimony. It appears that the statement of facts in this case was agreed to and filed by appellant as a true and correct statement of all the facts proven at the trial. This being true, appellant has failed to show that injury resulted to him from the court’s action. Hence we ■overrule 'his contentions.

By bills of exception Nos. 3 and 4 appellant complains because the court permitted the state to introduce as evidence the judgment of conviction in causes No. 9485 and 9835, styled the State of Texas v. Lewis Choate, as the same appeared on the minutes of said court. This was admissible under the allegation in the indictment that appellant had theretofore been convicted of felonies less than capital.

We have carefully gone over the testimony and believe that it is sufficient to sustain the conviction.

No objections were made to the court’s charge within the time prescribed by law.

No error appearing in the record,’ the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court