alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2527 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2527

  To amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 to increase the 
    amount of leverage made available to small business investment 
                               companies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 8, 2018

  Mr. Cardin (for himself, Mr. Risch, and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 to increase the 
    amount of leverage made available to small business investment 
                               companies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Investment 
Opportunity Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. INDIVIDUAL SBIC LEVERAGE LIMIT INCREASE.

    Section 303(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958 (15 U.S.C. 683(b)(2)(A)(ii)) is amended by striking 
``$150,000,000'' and inserting ``$175,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 9576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03523]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[PUBLIC NOTICE 8634]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Nur: Light in Art and Science From the Islamic 
World'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Nur: Light in Art and Science from the 
Islamic World,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within 
the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Dallas Museum of Art, Dallas, TX, from on or 
about March 30, 2014, until on or about June 29, 2014, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 11, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-03523 Filed 2-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
EXHIBIT 11

                     JONES APPAREL GROUP, INC.

       Computation of Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share
             (In thousands except per share amounts)


                                         For the Year Ended December 31, 
                                        --------------------------------
                                            1998        1997<F1>    1996<F1>
                                        --------    --------     -------
Basic Earnings per Share:
-------------------------
Net income...........................   $154,864    $121,725     $80,874
                                        ========    ========     =======

Weighted average number of shares
outstanding..........................    101,614     103,797     104,667
                                        ========    ========     =======

Basic earnings per share.............      $1.52       $1.17       $0.77
                                        ========    ========     =======


Diluted Earnings per Share:
---------------------------
Net income...........................   $154,864    $121,725     $80,874
                                        ========    ========     =======

Weighted average number of shares
outstanding..........................    101,614     103,797     104,667

Assumed issuances under exercise 
of stock options.....................      3,514       4,013       2,636
                                        --------    --------     -------

                                         105,128     107,810     107,303
                                        ========    ========     =======

Diluted earnings per share...........      $1.47       $1.13       $0.75
                                        ========    ========     =======

<F1> Adjusted for 2-for-1 stock split effective June 25, 1998.
### ~ 

# --

-- 

# --**-~-** '

Via FederalExpress January 15,2013 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor Room Wl2-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: Docket ID: FAA-2012-1343 

# liliJ JM·l 

## Il A 

# :0: 2b SOUTHWEST AIRLINES 

### CO. Jeffrey P. Novota Attorney P. 0. Box 36611 HDQ/4GC Dallas, Texas 75235-1611 214/792-4497 214/792-4086 (Fax)

By letter dated December 21, 2012 and pursuant to 14 CFR 

### § 11.61, Southwest Airlines Co. ("Southwest") petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") for an exemption from certain federal regulations enumeratedtherein. The FAA DrugAbatement Division subsequently advised Southwest the reliefsought in such petition is notrequired ornecessary because Southwest Airlines Co. and AirTran Airways, Inc. operatepursuant to a single operating certificate ("SOC"). The SOC in the name "SouthwestAirlines Co. and/or AirTran Airways, Inc." was formally issued bythe FAA on March 1, 2012. Accordingly, Southwesthereby rescinds the petition for exemption dated December 21,2012 in its entirety. Ifwe can provide additional information or be ofany other assistance, please contact the undersigned, Carolyn Beutler, Manager, Southwest Airlines Drug and Alcohol Program (214-792-4486), orPamela Childers, Southwest Airlines Drug and Alcohol Program Compliance Lead (214-792-4884). Southwest Airlines Co.

# ILP~
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT NO. 23

                       CONSENT OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



The Board of Directors
Wisconsin Central Transportation Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the previously filed registration
statements (No. 333-44049) on Form S-3 and (No. 33-40820, No. 33-65678, No. 33-
84088, No. 33-80309 and No. 333-35493) on Form S-8 of Wisconsin Central
Transportation Corporation of our report dated January 28, 1998, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Wisconsin Central Transportation Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which report appears
in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Wisconsin Central
Transportation Corporation.



                                    KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 25, 1998
Order entered August 1, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00566-CV

JOHN GARDNER, Appellant

V.

MELISSA PATT GARDNER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-25055

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated June 21, 2018, we 

notified Donna Kindle, Official Court Reporter for the 303rd Judicial District Court that the 

reporter’s record was overdue. We directed Ms. Kindle to file the reporter’s record within thirty 

days. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed. 

Accordingly, we order Donna Kindle, Official Court Reporter for the 303rd Judicial 

District Court, to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order either (1) the reporter’s 

record; (2) written verification no hearings were recorded; or (3) written verification that 

appellants have not requested, paid for, or made arrangements to pay for the record and have not 

been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We notify appellant that if we receive 

verification the reporter’s record has not been requested, or that appellant has not paid for or 
made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record and has not been found entitled to proceed 

without payment of costs, we will order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See

Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). 

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to:

Honorable Denise Garcia

Presiding Judge

303rd Judicial District Court

Donna Kindle 

Official Court Reporter 

303rd Judicial District Court

All parties 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                    Subsidiaries

                                     Exhibit 21 






                                                                        
                                                       State of            
Parent and Subsidiary*                              Incorporation       

Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.                   New York

  Rockland Electric Company                           New Jersey

    Saddle River Holdings Corp.                       Delaware

      Atlantic Morris Broadcasting, Inc.--            Delaware
 
      NORSTAR Holdings, Inc.                          Delaware
                      
        NORSTAR Management, Inc.                      Delaware
        Millbrook Holdings, Inc.                      Delaware
 
  Pike County Light & Power Company                   Pennsylvania

  Clove Development Corporation                       New York

  O&R Energy Development, Inc.                        Delaware

  O&R Development, Inc.                               Delaware







*Each level of indentation represents subsidiary status of the company
  under which it is immediately indented.


0718.wp
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, DC Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc.

Complainant, V. Docket No. 16-15-03 City of Renton, Washington

Respondent. / 

### UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PRO-FLIGHT AVIATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME Complainant Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc. ("PFA"), pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 16.19 and § 16.11(a), hereby requests leave to file and files this motion for a 30-day extension of time from the current due date to file its answer to Respondent City of Renton, Washington's ("City" or "Respondent") Motion for Summary Judgment. In support of this motion, PFA states as follows: 1. On January 28, 2015, PFA filed a Part 16 Complaint ("Complaint") against Respondent. On February 06, 2015, the FAA issued a notice that the Complaint had been docketed. 2. On February 17, 2015, Respondent moved for an extension of time, and by order dated March 11, 2015, the Administrator granted Respondent a 45-day extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. On April 17, 2015, Respondent filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, and Complainant received the Motion for Summary Judgment on April 20, 2015.3. Pursuant to the Part 16 rules of procedure, an answer to Respondent's Motion

for Summary Judgement is due within 10 days of service, plus five days when service is made by first class or certified mail. 14 C.F.R. §§ 16.17(c) and 16.26(c)(3). Accordingly, PFA's answer is currently due on May 5, 2015. 4. This request for an extension of time is not being made to delay the proceeding. Respondent has presented a number of issues in its forty-six page Motion for Summary Judgment that PFA will need to respond to, all of which will require a significant amount of time to carefully consider. Given this, PFA believes that a 30-day extension of time is both necessary and appropriate "for a fair and complete consideration of the matters before the agency." § 16.11(a). 5. On April 21, 2015, the undersigned contacted Zanetta L. Fontes, counsel for Respondent, who advised that the City would not oppose this request. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Pro-Flight respectfully requests a 30-day extension of time to file its answer to Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment, making such due on or before June 4, 2015. Dated Apri123, 2015 Respectfully su mitt d



# Z a Bernard A. Paholke Vice President Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc Complainant

2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that in accordance with 14 CFR §§ 16.15 and 16.13(h), I have this day, the 23 d of April 2015, served the foregoing Motion for extension of time on the following persons by electronic mail:

City of Renton Attn: Zanetta Fontes Senior Assistant City Attorney's Office 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 zfontesgrentonwa.gov

Federal Aviation Administration Part 16 Docket Clerk Office of the Chief Counsel Attention: FAA Part 16 Docket Clerk AGC-600 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW. Washington, DC 20591 9-AWA-AGC-Part-16@faa.gov 

# zn

- 

# P'ZA
Bernard A. Paholke Vice President Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc 750 W. Perimeter Rd Unit #1 Renton, WA 98057

3
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Robert William Richardson, * From the 90th District Court

of Stephens County,

Trial Court No. F35551

Vs. No. 11-19-00307-CR * October 21, 2021

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 240 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 240

 To nullify the effect of the recent Executive order that temporarily 
restricted individuals from certain countries from entering the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2017

 Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Durbin, Ms. Klobuchar, 
Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Wyden, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Udall, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. 
  Murphy, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Carper, Mr. Sanders, Mr. 
 Markey, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Heinrich, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Brown, 
 Ms. Stabenow, Ms. Cortez Masto, Mr. Kaine, Ms. Harris, Mr. Leahy, Mr. 
     Peters, Mr. Coons, Mr. Menendez, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Booker, Mr. 
 Whitehouse, Mr. Franken, Ms. Hirono, Ms. Warren, Mr. King, Mr. Casey, 
Mr. Warner, and Mr. Reed) introduced the following bill; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To nullify the effect of the recent Executive order that temporarily 
restricted individuals from certain countries from entering the United 
                                States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESCISSION.

    The provisions of Executive Order 137_ (82 Fed. Reg. ___; January 
27, 2017), entitled ``Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist 
Entry into the United States'', are rescinded and shall not have any 
legal effect.
                                 <all>
```
```
**EXHIBIT 12**
```

```

                        JONES APPAREL GROUP, INC.
            COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                            (In millions)

                                          Year Ended December 31,
                                   ------------------------------------
                                       2004          2003          2002
                                   --------      --------      --------

Income before income taxes........   $482.9        $527.0        $533.5
                                   --------      --------      --------
Fixed charges
  Interest expense and
    amortization of
    financing costs...............     51.2          58.8          62.7
  Portion of rent expense
    representing interest.........     39.3          34.1          32.1
                                   --------      --------      --------
Total fixed charges...............     90.5          92.9          94.8
                                   --------      --------      --------
Income before income taxes and
  fixed charges...................   $573.4        $619.9        $628.3
                                   ========      ========      ========
Ratio of earnings to
  fixed charges...................      6.3           6.7           6.6
                                   ========      ========      ========
```
**Exhibit 32.2**
**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS**
     In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MeriStarHospitality Corporation (the “Issuer”) for the quarterly period ended June 30,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Donald D. Olinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78mor 78o(d)); and
 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Issuer.        Date: August 6, 2004 /s/ Donald D. Olinger   Donald D. Olinger   Executive Vice President and    Chief Financial OfficerMeriStar Hospitality Corporation
Test Procedures for Distribution Transformers

SNOPR Public Meeting

Sampling Plans for

Compliance and Enforcement Testing

Building Technologies Program

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Department Energy

September 27, 2004

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 45.9
,.)arnpling Plan for Compliance Testing

Purpose: establish on a one-time bas is, the effi ciency

basic model

2

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 45.9
Selection of Un i ts Testi ng wi thin

For each basic model, sel ect a sample of 5 or mo re un i ts

® Production units or units representative of production units

• If fewer than 5 units are available over a reasonable period, test all

units

- Must use sample size of 5 units or more to substantiate an AEDM

3

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 45.9
DOE Proposed Sampling Plan - Operating

2 ® Cal culate the average efficiency it with

the requ irement of the following operating equation:

100

100 1 +^1 +^5JLRE h1

Where:

X = measured average

efficiency of test sample

n = number of units tested

RE = rated efficiency

Expressed in terms of power loss:

X -< RL 1 + ^-n

Where:

X = measured average power

loss of sample

n = number of units tested

ILL = represented power loss

4

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 45.9
DOE Proposed Sampling Plan - Operatin

(continued)

® The magn itude and functionality of the "expanded

uncertai nty" term, (0.05N n), affect results

® Methodology similar the stat isti cal z-e

Statistical basis and operating characteristics are discussed

in NI ST Technical Note 1456

5

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 45.9
Other Issues?.

opportun i ty for discuss ot

to the proposed sampli ng plan distribution

6

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 45.9
Enforcement Testing

Enforcement testing consistent with for

consumer electric

CFR Part 431 )

Key points the Enforcement Testing procedure discuss:

• Test Notice

• Test Unit Selection and Preparation

• Sampling Plan for Enforcement Testing

® Testing Manufactu rer's Opti on

7

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 45.9
aampling Plan for Enforcement Testing

L Test method: DOE test procedure

Up to 20 un its may be selected testi ng

Five un its are tested initially

I- The Sampling Pl an

® 97.5% confidence li m it

® Five percent tolera nce on losses

Allowances for li m ited testing

8

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 45.9
0

w^j# Chart

(Append ix I 3 of Part 432)

INTIAL TESTS

n, number of tests

ml number of units

CALCULATE

X, sample mean

S1 standard deviation

SE(XI) standard error

SSD(m,) sample size discount

LCLI lower control limit

CALCULATE

X2 sample mean

SE(X2)standard error

LCL2 lower control limit

MANUFACTURER'S

OPTIONAL TESTING

9

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 45.9
00"'ther Issues ?.

opportun ity for stakeholders di scuss other issues

to enforcement testing a d istri buti on transformer.

10

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 45.9
```

CONFIRMING STATEMENT

    This statement confirms that the undersigned, Michael J. Stewart, has authorized and designated, Jennifer Mainord, Amanda C. Williams or Rhonda Bost, to execute and file on the undersignedTMs behalf, all Form 3, 4, and 5 (including amendments thereto) that the undersigned may be required to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a result of the undersignedTMs ownership of or transactions in securities of First Merchants Corporation.  The authority of Jennifer Mainord, Amanda C. Williams or Rhonda Bost under this statement shall continue until the undersigned is no longer required to file Form 3, 4, and 5 with regard to the undersigned ownership or transactions in securities of First Merchants Corporation, unless earlier revoked in writing.  The undersigned acknowledges Jennifer Mainord, Amanda C. Williams or Rhonda Bost are not assuming any of the undersignedTMs responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                        __/s/ Michael J. Stewart______
                        Michael J. Stewart

Date: February 13, 2014
```