alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Commission of Alaska

                                   Certificate

                                       Of

                        Public Convenience and Necessity

                                     No. 489

Having found that the grantee of this certificate is fit, willing, and able to
provide the utility services applied for and that such services are required for
the convenience and necessity of the public, the Regulatory Commission of
Alaska, pursuant to the authority vested in it by AS 42.05, hereby issues this
certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to

                     GCI COMMUNICATIONS CORP. d/b/a GENERAL
                         COMMUNICATION, INC., d/b/a GCI

authorizing it to operate a public utility, as defined by AS 42.05.990(4) (B)
for the purpose of furnishing

                           TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE
                                (LOCAL EXCHANGE)

This Certificate is issued under, and subject to, the provisions of AS 42.05 and
all rules, regulations. and orders from time to time promulgated by the
Commission governing the rates, charges, services, facilities, and practices of
utility operations of the kind authorized herein.

The specific nature, scope, terms, conditions, and limitations of the authority
granted by this Certificate, as amended to date, are set forth in the appendix
hereto and in the following order(s) of the Commission which, by this reference,
are incorporated in and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein.

Docket No.                                                  Date of Order
U-00-02(1)                                                  July 7, 2000

   (Chronology and service are descriptions shown on the attached Appendix A)

IN WITNESS THEREOF, the undersigned members of the Commission have executed this
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity at Anchorage, Alaska on this 2nd
day of September 2000.

                      [SEAL]         Regulatory Commission of Alaska

                                                    /s/
                                                 (CHAIR)

                                                    /s/
                                              (COMMISSIONER)

                                                    /s/
                                              (COMMISSIONER)

                                                    /s/
                                              (COMMISSIONER)

                                                    /s/
                                              (COMMISSIONER)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BRIAN J. SHEPARD
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 2868

[ September 3, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Charles A. Schwab

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562012CF001942

.

Robert David Malove of The Law Offices of Robert David Malove , Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney Ge neral, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber

, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, G ROSS and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 3.2

 
                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                        ALTERNATIVE LIVING SERVICES, INC.
              AMENDED AND RESTATED 1995 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

         Pursuant to Paragraph 20 of the  Alternative  Living  Services,  Inc.
Amended and Restated 1995 Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended (as so
amended, the "Plan"), Alternative Living Services, Inc., (the "Corporation"),
does hereby amend the Plan as follows:

         1.        Section 2 of the Plan is hereby  amended by deleting  Section
2 of the Plan in its entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:

                           "SECTION  2.  Shares of Stock  Subject  to the Plan.
                   Stock which may be issued pursuant to Stock Options, SARs and
                   Restricted Stock granted from time to time under this Plan
                   shall not exceed in the aggregate 2,500,000 shares of ALS
                   common stock (including fractional shares thereof), $.01 par
                   value (the "Common Stock"), subject to further adjustment as
                   provided in Sections 16 and 17 hereof. It is contemplated
                   that the shares to be issued upon the exercise of Stock
                   Options or SARs or as Restricted Stock granted under this
                   Plan will be approved for listing by each securities exchange
                   on which shares of Common Stock are then listed.

                           In the event that the number of shares  underlying
                   any Stock Option or SAR granted under the Plan is reduced for
                   any reason, or any Stock Option or SAR under the Plan can no
                   longer be exercised in part or in whole (other than due to
                   the exercise of a related SAR or a related Stock Option, as
                   the case may be), or shares awarded as Restricted Stock are
                   forfeited, the number of shares no longer subject to such
                   Stock Option or SAR or so forfeited are thereupon deemed
                   released and are thereafter available for subsequent awards
                   under the Plan (unless the Plan shall have been terminated).

         Except as  specifically  amended  hereby,  all other terms and 
provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. If not otherwise
defined herein, all capitalized terms contained in this Amendment shall have the
meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.



<PAGE>   2

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  in accordance with Section 20 of the Plan, the
Plan is hereby amended,  effective as of this 14th day of May, 1998.

                                            ALTERNATIVE LIVING SERVICES, INC.



                              BY:
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                       William F. Lasky, Chief Executive Officer
Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District 

JULY 15, 2014 

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b). 

1. Case No. SD32931 

 Re: STATE OF MISSOURI, 

 Plaintiff-Respondent, 

 vs. 

 JEREMIAH ASHLEY KIRK, 

 Defendant-Appellant.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Thomas C. Chesterman, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Aradigm Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Dated: August 11, 2005 /s/ THOMAS C. CHESTERMAN   Thomas C. Chesterman              *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*
#### MILLER v. STATE.

No. 20982.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 29, 1940.

J. Mitch Johnson and Walter E. Gates, both of San Saha, for appellant.

G. A. Walters, Co. Atty., of San Saba, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of the unlawful possession of whisky for the purpose of sale, and under an allegation of a prior like offense he was fined the sum of $200.

Complaint is made relative to the introduction of a carbon copy of the affidavit and search warrant authorizing the search of appellant’s premises. Secondary evidence, we think, was admissible where it was shown that the original had been lost and after diligent search could not be found, in order to show execution, the presence and the contents of such an instrument.

On account of the matters set forth in bill of exceptions No. *7*we predicate a reversal of this case.

In the complaint and information the instant offense is alleged, and for the purpose of enhancing the punishment we find a further allegation that appellant had been convicted on May 22, 1939, in the same county court, in cause No. 1769 for an offense of like character.

It is shown by the record that on the day prior to this trial this same defendant had been tried for a similar offense," and for the purpose of an enhancement of the punishment this same additional cause No. 1769, of date May 22, 1939,' had been in-, troduced and used for the purpose of enhancing the penalty in that case. A former case of like character can be successfully used for enhancement purposes but once. We have heretofore held in the case of Kinney v. State, 45 Tex.Cr.R. 500, 79 S.W. 570, 571, that: “It is furthermore urged that these three same offenses were used in Nos. 26,836 and 26,837 in order to enhance the punishment against appellant; that is, said cases were used not only to enhance appellant’s punishment in the case on trial, but had previously been used in the two preceding cases. An inspection of the record sustains this contention. Evidently it was never intended that prior offenses could thus be made to do double duty; that is, that prior cases could be used to enhance the punishment in any given case more than once.”

*860Also see the late case of Cothren v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 140 S.W.2d 860, decided May 22, 1940, not yet reported [in State Reports].

It is noticed that the jury responded to the court’s charge thereon and gave appellant double the lowest fine. See Art. 61, P.C.

On account of the use herein for enhancement of punishment of cause No. 1769, which had theretofore been used for such purpose, this judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
### DocketNo: FAA-2013-1003 Directorate ID: 2013-NE-33-AD Disposition Comments
Originating Office Tracking No.: SP03476EN-E D These comments are in response to an SNPRM
Next Step: 

### DFRAN 

### D SNPRM

# ~JA TJ..,'.r ;rS'

# <~~t4 .:rA,e..,

# 'e.J"""'~~"'t 

# f...- .c.,A1""'£...r.s. 

### IZI No 

### Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received -..[(this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### No 

### Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? Ifyes, list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previouslypublishedNPRMwill require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focalpoint for guidance. Lat<.::"t Revisiun. Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all ofthe issues from one commenter together. Ifchanges to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9. ISSUE 

### 1: Select one of thefollowing: 

### Chl10sc unc. 

## If

other, explain: Commenter(s): Click here to enter k:xt. What change to the AD action is requested? Click here to enter tc'\t. Why is the change requested or how is itjustified? Click here to enter text. Do we agree? Yes**·~**o If YES, we agree because Insert**justilic;.~tion** Make the following changes to the AD: Li::-t an) chang.:s to th.: AD IfPARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with lns.:rt text because**fns..:rtjustiJicati~.1n** We disagree with Ins.:rt t.:xt because Insert**justiticati~.)n** Make the following changes to the AD: 

### Li"t an) change::; to the
.

### \D IfNO, we don't agree because Insert our rationale
ISSUE 2: 

### Select one of thefollowing: Chol)::;e on.:. 

## If

other, explain: Click. here to enter text. Commenter(s): Click her..: tn enter te:xt. What change to the AD action is requested? Click her.: to cnh:r tc:xt. Why is the change requested or how is itjustified? Click her.: tn ent.:1· l\."\t. Do we agree?**Ye~** :\l) 

### Page I of3

### IfYES, we agree because Insert**ju~tifi...::ati•Jn** 

### Make the following changes to the AD: 

### List an;. ch<.mg6 1<1**th~** 

### "\D IfPARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with !n:-;crt tc.-.;:t because**In~crtju~tificati<)l1** 

### We disagree with Insert 

### k:\t because Insert**.iu~tification** 

### Make the following changes to the AD: List 

### any**cban~c"** 

### to the
.\D IfNO, we don't agree because**!ns~rt** lllH"**r~Hir111~1k**


### For additional issues, double-click here



### Page 2 of3

### Signature Section Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:


### ASE Printed Name:**f'~n;f'** 

## ,4. ll$er I 

## ell

# [,I~ N;(<, q;/I\ (I Branch M{uager Date



### Page 3 of3
**Exhibit15.01**

 

November 14, 2003

 

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Commissioners:

 

We are aware that our report dated October 26, 2003 on our review ofinterim financial information of WellPoint Health Networks Inc. (the “Company”)and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and2002 and included in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2003 is incorporated by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-05111, 333-33013, 333-42073, 333-81687,333-90791, 333-37958, 333-55314, 333-81872, 333-103481, 333-83462 and333-109097), Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-08519 and 333-101475) and Form S-4 (FileNos. 333-73382, 333-106689 and 333-108132).

 

 

Very truly yours,

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,406
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                       968
<INVENTORY>                                     11,689
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,289
<PP&E>                                          46,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,286
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,708
<BONDS>                                         19,311
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            67
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,207
<SALES>                                          3,873
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,033
<CGS>                                            1,802
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,931
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 317
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      5
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  3
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         3
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Java King Coffee Inc. - Exhibit 10.3






	Agreement	


THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 26 day of August
  2004 by H&H Co., Ltd„ located at 12 Baihua Garden, Haoxi Rd. Nantong,
  Jiangsu, PRC. (hereinafter referred to as "The Client") has contracted
  Javaking Coffee located at 248, 8111 Ryan Rd. BC V7A 2E4 (hereinafter referred
  to as "Javaking") to improve its coffee shop. Javaking and THE CLIENT
  (hereinafter referred to as the "parties") have agreed to meet the
  following criteria outlined below. 

A. Initial Payment and Refund Policy

At the contract signing, 20% of the service estimate $2,500
  is due. To request a refund, please submit a written request to Javaking within
  15 days of signing this contract. All work completed will be deducted from the
  initial payment. THE CLIENT is liable for any work completed beyond the initial
  payment at the above stated rate. No portion of initial payment will be refunded
  if a written cancellation request is not received within 15 days of contract
  signing.

 B. Deliverables 

	 	1.	 Javaking Deliverables
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	a.	 Provide advise on improvements to the existing coffee shop to incorporate
      American style coffee shop decorations
	 	 	b.	 Provide Menu Booklet on operation of specialty coffee outlets
	 	 	 	 
	 	2.	 Client Deliverables
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Once THE CLIENT has accepted
        our decoration opinions and booklet, THE CLIENT agrees to pay the remaining
        80% balance of the estimate.

	 	 	 	 
	 	3. 	Time
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Parties agree to work together
        to complete the service in a timely manner. Javaking agrees to work expeditiously
        to complete the service.



C. Credit

 Javaking retains the tight to include THE CLIENT's coffee shop design in a
  professional portfolio.

D. Confidentiality 

Javaking will keep confidential information regarding the improvement of the
  coffee shop.





E. Service Agreement

The parties have agreed to meet the above stated criteria.
  Any services, aside from those mentioned above and in the attached estimate,
  will be liable for a $100 an hour additional charge.

		
	 	 
	H&H Co., Ltd.	Java king Coffee Inc.
#### ATCHISON, T. & S. F. RY. CO. v. BUTLER.

No. 21862.

Supreme Court of Texas.

April 1, 1936.

Turney, Burges, Culwell & Pollard and J. F. Hulse, all of El Paso, for plaintiff in error.

Wilchar & Wilchar, of EÍ Paso, for defendant in error.

TAYLOR, Commissioner.

The disposition made of this case by the Court of Civil Appeals, 89 S.W.(2d) 791, is correct. We are not in accord, however, with the statement in the opinion to the effect that in Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Belcher, 89 Tex. 428, 35 S.W. 6, the rule that, in order to recover' special damages for breach of contract it is incumbent upon plaintiff to show that at the date of the contract the defendant had notice of the special conditions rendering such damages the natural and probable result of the breach, was abrogated by this court in Conn et al. v. Texas & N. O. Ry. Co., 14 S.W.(2d) 1004. The rule announced in the Belcher Case is still the law. In the Conn Case, as in this, the carrier made a new agreement, and at the time had knowledge of the special damages that would result from the negligent breach of the new agreement.

• Application for the writ is therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Article 1728, R.S.1925, as amended by Acts 1927, 40th Leg., p. 214, c. 144, § 1 (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 1728).

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ORIOLE HOMES CORP. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1995, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       3,275,615
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,056,108
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                131,427,502
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      34,897,088
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,892,078
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             179,478,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     90,022,886
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       462,553       
<OTHER-SE>                                 167,198,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               179,478,317
<SALES>                                     75,019,534
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            82,236,270
<CGS>                                       63,617,004
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               80,714,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,286,926
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             904,045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (14,764,899)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (3,003,335)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (11,761,564)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (11,761,564)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>