alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                     106,033,260
<SECURITIES>                                91,719,597
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           201,739,854
<PP&E>                                       5,302,822
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,857,281)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             243,435,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,906,848
<BONDS>                                        796,325
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,740
<OTHER-SE>                                 226,709,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               243,435,875
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               427,750
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            27,707,661
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,503
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (73,327,546)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (73,327,546)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (73,327,546)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.48)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin Salinas, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 10, 2009



/s/ Martin Salinas, Jr.Martin Salinas, Jr.Chief Financial Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable David Laro, United States Tax Court Judge. 1 United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-4035

___________ Herbert C. Elliott, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Tax Court. * Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 15, 1998 Filed: April 30, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Her bert Elliott appeals the United States Tax Court's determination that th e 1 Internal Revenue Service's assessment of certain tax deficiencies was correct. Upon review of the record and the parti es' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the tax court for the reasons stated in its decision. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. ATTEST: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS

___________________________________________________ NO.: 03

- 15

- 00277

- CR

ROBIE LEE LAWHON

v.

STATE OF TEXAS

___________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 200 th Judicial District Court of Milam County, Texas ( No. 2 4,712 )

___________________________________________________

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF FOR APPELL ANT ROBIE LEE LAWHON

Tyler Pennington PENNINGTON LAW PLLC 106 S. Harris St., Suite 125 Round Rock, Texas 78664 Tel: (512) 255

- 2733 Fax: (866) 736

- 3690

COUNSEL FOR APPELL ANT ROBIE LEE LAWHON ACCEPTED 03-15-00277-CR 5551059 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/4/2015 3:35:09 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKNO.: 03

- 15

- 00277

- CR 1 TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

Appellant Robie Lee Lawhon , through his attorney of record

, Tyler Pennington of

Pennington L aw PLLC respectfully requests an extension to file his appell ant brief.

Undersigned counsel has various trial settings from the date of filing this motion through

the end of June 2015. Due to undersigned counsel’s trial schedule he is unable to submit

the brief by the current deadline of June 22, 2015. Appellant requests a 30

- day extension

making the brief due on July 22, 2015.

Dated: June 4, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Tyler Pennington Tyler Pennington PENNINGTON LAW PLLC 106 S. Harris St., Suite 125 Round Rock, Texas 78664 Tel: (512) 255

- 2733 Fax: (866) 736

- 3690

COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT ROBIE LEE LAWHONNO.: 03

- 15

- 00277

- CR 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true copy of the above and foregoing instrument, together

with thi s proof of service has been sent to the District Attorney’s Office of Milam

County, Texas on June 4, 2015 via as follows:

Bill Torrey Milam County District Attorney 204 N. Central Cameron, Texas 76520 PH: 254

- 697

- 7013 FAX: 254

- 697

- 7016 By facsimile

/s/ Tyler Pennington Tyler Pennington
EXHIBIT 23
                       INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc.:


Re:Registration Statements No. 33-41050, No. 33-26271, No. 33-12276, No.
   33-48808, No. 33-65132, No. 33-60891, No. 33-13013 and No. 333-69157 on
   Forms S-8.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
referred to above of Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc. of our report dated
November 26, 1997 relating to the balance sheets of Flex Products, Inc. as
of November 2, 1997 and November 3, 1996, and the related statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended,
which report appears in the October 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of
Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc.


KPMG LLP


San Francisco, California
January 29, 1999
# Uradni list C 273/2015

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 273 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Zvezek 5818. avgust 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 273

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Zvezek 5818. avgust 2015

---

| Obvestilo št. | Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Popravki |
| 2015/C 273/01 | Popravek Stališča Sveta (EU) št. 10/2015 v prvi obravnavi z namenom sprejetja uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 515/97 o medsebojni pomoči med upravnimi organi držav članic in o sodelovanju med njimi in Komisijo zaradi zagotavljanja pravilnega izvajanja carinske in kmetijske zakonodaje – Sprejeto v Svetu dne 15. junija 2015( UL C 239, 21.7.2015 ) | 1 |

Obvestilo št.

Vsebina

Stran

Popravki

2015/C 273/01

Popravek Stališča Sveta (EU) št. 10/2015 v prvi obravnavi z namenom sprejetja uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 515/97 o medsebojni pomoči med upravnimi organi držav članic in o sodelovanju med njimi in Komisijo zaradi zagotavljanja pravilnega izvajanja carinske in kmetijske zakonodaje – Sprejeto v Svetu dne 15. junija 2015( UL C 239, 21.7.2015 )

( UL C 239, 21.7.2015 )

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

Popravki

| 18.8.2015 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | C 273/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2015

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

C 273/1

---

Popravek Stališča Sveta (EU) št. 10/2015 v prvi obravnavi z namenom sprejetja uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 515/97 o medsebojni pomoči med upravnimi organi držav članic in o sodelovanju med njimi in Komisijo zaradi zagotavljanja pravilnega izvajanja carinske in kmetijske zakonodaje – Sprejeto v Svetu dne 15. junija 2015

(
  Uradni list Evropske unije C 239 z dne 21. julija 2015
  )

(2015/C 273/01)

Stran 10, člen 1, točka 15:

vstavi se naslednja točka:

| „(c) | odstavek 3 se črta;“. |
| --- | --- |

„(c)

odstavek 3 se črta;“.

---
1Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.

47.5.4.

-1-

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 26, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________________

No. 03 - 60655

SUMMARY CALENDAR

_________________________

RUPERTO GUTIERREZ-MORALES,

Petitioner,

 v.

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

______________________________________________________________________________

Petition for Review of an Order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A91-283-466

______________________________________________________________________________

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

In this appeal, we review the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision denying Ruperto

Gutierrez-Morales’ motion to reopen his removal proceedings and refusing to accept his untimely

application for cancellation of removal. 

Gutierrez-Morales argues that the Immigration Judge violated his due process rights by

refusing to accept his untimely application for cancellation of removal and by denying his motion
-2-

to reopen. Gutierrez-Morales also argues that the arrest which prompted his removal was illegal.

Gutierrez-Morales waived the opportunity to submit his application for cancellation of

removal when he missed the imposed filing deadline. 8 C.F.R. § 3.31(c) (2003). His motion to

reopen was properly denied because he was informed of his right to apply for cancellation of

removal, and he was provided an opportunity to do so. 8 C.F.R. § 3.23(b)(3) (2002). Thus, the

Immigration Judge did not violate Gutierrez-Morales’ due process rights.

Gutierrez-Morales’ challenge to his arrest does not warrant relief because even if he could

demonstrate that his arrest was illegal, it would have no bearing on the validity of his subsequent

removal. I.N.S. v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032, 1040 (1984).

Gutierrez-Morales’ petition for review is therefore denied.
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smith Barney Mid-West Futures Fund L.P. II (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

/s/ David J.Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President andDirector     Date: November 12,2004

----
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 255 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 255

   To increase the rates of pay under the General Schedule and other 
statutory pay systems and for prevailing rate employees by 3.2 percent, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2017

 Mr. Schatz (for himself, Mr. Brown, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Cardin, and Mr. 
  Van Hollen) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To increase the rates of pay under the General Schedule and other 
statutory pay systems and for prevailing rate employees by 3.2 percent, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Adjustment of Income Rates 
Act of 2017'' or the ``FAIR Act''.

SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENT TO RATES OF PAY.

    (a) Statutory Pay Systems.--The adjustment in rates of basic pay 
for employees under the statutory pay systems (as defined in section 
5302 of title 5, United States Code) that takes effect in fiscal year 
2018 under section 5303 of title 5, United States Code, shall be an 
increase of 3.2 percent, and such adjustments shall be effective as of 
the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after 
January 1, 2018.
    (b) Prevailing Rate Employees.--The adjustment in rates of basic 
pay for the statutory pay systems that take place in fiscal year 2018 
under sections 5344 and 5348 of title 5, United States Code, shall be 
equal to the percentage adjustment received by employees in the same 
location whose rates of basic pay are adjusted pursuant to the 
statutory pay systems under subsection (a) of this section and 5304 of 
title 5, United States Code. Prevailing rate employees at locations 
where there are no employees whose pay is increased pursuant to 
sections 5303 and 5304 of title 5 and prevailing rate employees 
described in section 5343(a)(5) of title 5, United States Code, shall 
be considered to be located in the pay locality designated as ``Rest of 
US'' pursuant to section 5304 of title 5, United States Code, for 
purposes of this subsection.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Thomas C. Chesterman, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Aradigm Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     /s/ THOMAS C. CHESTERMAN     Thomas C. Chesterman  *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*   Dated: November 10, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,593
<SECURITIES>                                     3,955
<RECEIVABLES>                                      663
<ALLOWANCES>                                       174
<INVENTORY>                                        549
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,979
<PP&E>                                             855
<DEPRECIATION>                                     342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,008
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            83
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,257
<SALES>                                            436
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   750
<CGS>                                              274
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,416
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,913)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### PARADIS et al. v. STATE.

No. 20096.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 22, 1939.

Rehearing Denied April 12, 1939.

*660Rogers & Spurlock, of Fort Worth, for appellants.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty.,- of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

On July 31, 1936, an indictment was returned into the Criminal District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, charging G. D. Paradis in one count with forgery and in a second count with passing a forged instrument. On the 14th day of August, 1936, Paradis entered into an appearance bond in the sum of one thousand dollars with J. A. Petty and J. E. Petty as sureties. The case against Paradis was called for trial on the 11th of December, 1936. He failed to appear. A forfeiture was taken on his bond and judgment nisi entered against him and his sureties in the amount of said bond. Upon proper notice the trial was had on June 29, 1938, to determine whether the judgment nisi should he made final and judgment was entered against Paradis and J. A. Petty for the amount of said bond, the judgment directing that nothing be taken ágainst the surety J. E. Petty. From this final judgment J. A. Petty brings this appeal.

The facts developed upon the trial to determine whether the judgment should be made final are substantially the same as those found in cause No. 20109, Henry Darwin Caldwell et al. v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 126 S.W.2d 654, this day decided. The contention of appellants in the present case is the same as in the cause mentioned; viz: that the forfeiture was not taken in compliance with the directions of the statute.

The same reasons which lead to the af-firmance of the judgment in cause No. 20109 are operative here, and the judgment in the present case is affirmed.

On Appellants’ Motion for Rehearing.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

After carefully re-examining the record in the light of appellants’ motion for rehearing, we are constrained to adhere to the conclusion expressed in the original opinion.

The motion for. rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0104. MAHA Z. RAYAN v. THE STATE.

Maha Z. Rayan has been charged by accusation with theft by shoplifting. She

filed this direct appeal on April 7, 2017, challenging two pre-trial orders that were

entered in January 2017.

1

 We lack jurisdiction because the appeal is untimely.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the entry of the trial

court’s order. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal

is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon this Court. Couch v. United

Paperworkers Intl. Union, 224 Ga. App. 721 (482 SE2d 704) (1997). Here, Rayan

filed her notice of appeal more than two months after the trial court’s orders were

entered. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and it is hereby

DISMISSED.

The State has filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that we lack jurisdiction for

reasons other than the untimeliness of the notice of appeal. That motion is DENIED

AS MOOT.

1

 Rayan directed her appeal to the Supreme Court, which transferred the case

here.

August 30, 2017
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/30/2017