alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 267 

To amend the Peace Corps Act to allow former volunteers to use the seal, 

emblem, or name of Peace Corps on death announcements and grave stones. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2015 

Mr. SIRES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Peace Corps Act to allow former volunteers 

to use the seal, emblem, or name of Peace Corps on 

death announcements and grave stones. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Respect for Peace 

5 Corps Volunteers Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. USE OF OFFICIAL SEAL, EMBLEM, AND NAME OF 

7 THE PEACE CORPS. 

8 Subsection (b) of section 19 of the Peace Corps Act 

9 (22 U.S.C. 2518) is amended— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 267 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting before the pe2 riod at the end the following: ‘‘, except that the offi3 cial seal or emblem and the name ‘Peace Corps’ may 

4 be used on any death announcement, gravestone, 

5 plaque, or other grave marker of any person who 

6 served as a volunteer or applicant for enrollment as 

7 a volunteer under such rules as may be prescribed 

8 by the Director’’; and 

9 (2) in paragraph (2), in the first sentence, by 

10 inserting ‘‘or in accordance with the exception speci11 fied in paragraph (1),’’ before ‘‘shall be fined’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: S.H.R. v. Department of Family and Protective Services

Appellate case number: 01-10-00999-CV

Trial court case number: 0903028J

Trial court: 314th District Court of Harris County

Acting on the Court’s own motion, a majority of the Court has voted to grant en banc 

reconsideration in this case. See Tex. R. App. P. 49.7 (“While the court has plenary power, a 

majority of the en banc court may, with or without a motion, order en banc reconsideration of a 

panel’s decision. If a majority orders reconsideration, the panel’s judgment or order does not 

become final, and the case will be resubmitted to the court for en banc review and disposition.”). 

The Court requests a response from appellant to be filed with the Clerk of this Court no 

later than August 27, 2012.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

Acting for the Court

Date: August 10, 2012.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
Article 9 financial data schedule is restated for 10% stock dividend declared
September 28, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      63,502,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         159,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                454,400,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                  1,027,872,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                 15,404,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,646,380,000
<DEPOSITS>                               1,330,531,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                47,598,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         25,736,000
<LONG-TERM>                                 70,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  9,250,000
<COMMON>                                       220,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 163,045,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,646,380,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             90,192,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           29,644,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               785,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           120,621,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          52,266,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          57,166,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       63,455,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                9,700,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           7,669,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             50,212,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             24,638,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  24,638,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                16,970,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .73
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.24
<LOANS-NON>                                  6,223,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,347,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               436,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            10,116,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                5,327,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   915,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           15,404,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        15,404,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF LEVCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.

|                                    |  |                              |             |                            |     
|----------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ----------- | -------------------------- | ----
|Name                                |  | Jurisdiction of Organization |             | Percentage Owned by Levcor
|                                    |  |                              |             |                           
|                                    |  |                              |             |                            |     
|Blumenthal/Lansing Company, LLC     |  |                              | Delaware    |                            | 100%
|                                    |  |                              |             |                            |     
|Carlyle Manufacturing Company, Inc. |  |                              | Connecticut |                            | 100%
|                                    |  |                              |             |                            |     

---
*OPINION ISSUED FEBRUARY 11, 2009*

#### NORVELL RAY ATKINS SR. VS. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

(CC-08-0062)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Jason C. Workman, Attorney at Law, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Claimant brought this action for vehicle damage which occurred when his 2007 Chevrolet Impala struck a hole on Kanawha Boulevard in Charleston, Kanawha County. Kanawha Boulevard is a road maintained by respondent. The Court is of the opinion to *217make an award in this claim for the reasons more fully stated below.

The incident giving rise to this claim occurred at approximately 8:30 p.m. on January 30,2008. At the time of the incident, claimant and his wife, who was a passenger in the vehicle, were traveling from Riverview Gospel Tabernacle to their home in Belle. Claimant was driving between Wertz Avenue and the Charleston Moose Club at approximately twenty to twenty-five miles per hour when his vehicle struck a hole in the road. The hole was located in the far right lane and was approximately one and one-half feet long, one foot wide, and eight inches deep. Claimant does not travel on this road frequently, and he had not encountered the hole prior to this incident. As a result, claimant’s vehicle sustained damage to its wheel in the amount of $315.23 and its alignment in the amount of $103.35. Thus, claimant’s damages total $418.58. Claimant’s insurance deductible was $500.00 at the time of the incident.

The position of the respondent is that it did not have actual or constructive notice of the condition on Kanawha Boulevard. Respondent did not present a witness at the hearing.

The well-established principle of law in West Virginia is that the State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of travelers upon its roads. *Adkins v. Sims,*130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). In order to hold respondent liable for road defects of this type, a claimant must prove that respondent had actual or constructive notice of the defect and a reasonable time to take corrective action. *Chapman v. Dep’t of Highways,*16 Ct. Cl. 103 (1986).

In the instant case, the Court is of the opinion that respondent had, at the least, constructive notice of the hole which claimant’s vehicle struck and that the hole presented a hazard to the traveling public. The size of the hole and its location on the road lead the Court to conclude that respondent had notice of this condition. Thus, the Court finds respondent negligent and claimant may make a recovery for the damage to his vehicle.

In accordance with the findings of fact and conclusions of law stated herein above, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award to the claimant in the amount of $418.58.

Award of $418.58.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               APR-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           65,669
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 99,262
<PP&E>                                            4,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  106,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            24,803
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                            295
<OTHER-SE>                                       80,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    106,060
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                159,089
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (159,089)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (159,089)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (159,089)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .05
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2052

GREER C. SALYERS,

Petitioner,

versus

CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(98-1312-BLA, 97-1902-BLA)

Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: February 7, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Greer C. Salyers, Petitioner Pro Se. Timothy Ward Gresham, PENN,

STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia; Patricia May Nece, Barry H.

Joyner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for

Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Greer C. Salyers seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s

decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial

of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West

1986 & Supp. 1999). Our review of the record discloses that the

Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

Board. See Salyers v. Clinchfield Coal Co. BRB No. 98-1312-BLA

(B.R.B. July 2, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2251 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2251

  To require the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
              unique ZIP code for Swanzey, New Hampshire.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 19, 2017

  Mrs. Shaheen (for herself and Ms. Hassan) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
              unique ZIP code for Swanzey, New Hampshire.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SINGLE, UNIQUE ZIP CODE FOR SWANZEY, NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the United States Postal Service shall designate a single, unique ZIP 
code applicable to the area encompassing only Swanzey, New Hampshire, 
in its entirety.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.2**
**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION**
I, Richard E. Fish, certify that:
     1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ICG Communications,Inc.;
     2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.   Date: August 16, 2004 **/s/ Richard E. Fish, Jr.**  Richard E. Fish, Jr. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

MERISTAR HOSPITALITY CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MeriStar Hospitality Corporation,
(the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Paul W. Whetsell, Chief Executive Officer of MeriStar Hospitality
Corporation, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | 1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                            
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



|/s/ Paul W. Whetsell   
|-----------------------
|                       
|Paul W. Whetsell       
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 13, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 291 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-610, CP2024-618.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21304 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2009 

d0420 

Order 

 

April 28, 2009 

137830 & (78) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137830 

 COA: 273407 

Emmet CC: 06-002597-FC 

JOEL NATHAN DUFRESNE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

remand is DENIED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned officers of the registrant certify that the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)) and that information contained in this report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the registrant.

|      |  |              |  |                                                     
|----- |  | ------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | May 14, 2003 |  | /Philip S. Tabbiner/                                
|      |  |              |  | Philip S. Tabbiner                                  
|      |  |              |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|      |  |              |  |                                                     
|Date: |  | May 14, 2003 |  | /William L. Ginna, Jr./                             
|      |  |              |  | William L. Ginna, Jr.                               
|      |  |              |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|      |  |              |  |                                                     
|Date: |  | May 14, 2003 |  | /Frederick D. Sancilio/                             
|      |  |              |  | Frederick D. Sancilio                               
|      |  |              |  | Executive Chairman
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 20, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Cummins

FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on March 8, 2011 between Cummins and EPA and 

included the following individuals:

Cummins: Jackie Yeager, Jon Dickson, Gary Salemme, and Brian Mormino

EPA: Byron Bunker and Angela Cullen

The discussion focused primarily on the production and testing variability of engines.