alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.6


 


NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 


This Note Extension Agreement (the “Agreement”) is dated as of September 29,
2008 and is made by and between BRAD FOOTE GEAR WORKS, INC., f/k/a BFG
Acquisition Corp., an Illinois corporation (“Borrower”) and LASALLE BANK
NATIONAL BANK f/k/a LaSalle National Bank f/k/a LaSalle Bank NI, a national
banking association (the “Bank”).


 


R E C I T A L S


 


A.            Borrower has
previously delivered to the Bank its Amended and Restated Renewal Revolving
Note dated January 15, 2008 in the principal amount of $10,000,000.00, as
modified and extended by Note Extension Agreements dated as of June 30,
2008 and August 30, 2008 (the “Note”), evidencing a revolving  line of credit loan extended by the Bank to
the Borrower; and


 


B.            The Note matures on October 31,
2008, and Borrower has asked the Bank to further extend the maturity date of
the Note until January 15, 2009; and


 


C.            The Bank has
consented to such loan request, on the terms hereinafter provided.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing, and for valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.             In the first line
of the first paragraph on page 1 of the Note, the date “October 31,
2008” is hereby deleted, and the date “January 15, 2009” is substituted
therefor.  Borrower confirms to the Bank
that the Note shall mature on January 15, 2009.


 


2.             Borrower
acknowledges and irrevocably agrees that the payment and performance of the
Note, as extended hereby, shall continue to be secured by Collateral Documents
(as such term is defined in the Loan and Security Agreement dated January 17,
1997 between the Borrower and the Bank, as amended from time to time).


 


3.             Except as expressly
modified by this Agreement, all terms and provisions of the Note shall stand
and remain in full force and effect.


 


SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS


 


1

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the day and  year first above written.


 


	
  BORROWER:

  
	
   

  
	
  BRAD
  FOOTE GEAR WORKS, INC.

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ J.
  Cameron Drecoll

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   J. Cameron Drecoll

  
	
  Title: 

  	
   Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  BANK:

  
	
   

  
	
  LASALLE
  BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Katherine M. Novey

  	
   

  
	
  Title: 

  	
  Vice President

  	
   

  
				



 


2
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICT Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Brennan, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|              |  |                        
|------------- |  | -----------------------
|July 26, 2004 |  | /s/ John J. Brennan    
|              |  | John J. Brennan        
|              |  | Chairman, President and
|              |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### Mrs. Joe A. VERA et al. v. D. V. BROOKS COMPANY.

No. 1609-6502.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section B.

May 13, 1936.

Dawson H. Davis and Homer B. Green, both of Fort Worth, for plaintiffs in error.

George E. Miller, of Fort Worth, for defendant in error.

SMEDLEY, Commissioner.

Plaintiffs in error sued defendant in error in the county court at law of Tarrant county to recover $257 due upon several promissory notes, with interest and attorney’s fees, and for foreclosure of a chattel mortgage on an automobile given to secure the notes. The petition contained no allegation of the value of the automobile, but its value, in an amount within the court’s jurisdiction, was stated in an affidavit for sequestration filed by the plaintiffs on the day the suit was filed. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and remanded the cause. 58 S.W.(2d) 1061. The question presented is the same as that this day decided in Mrs. C. B. Brown et al. v. C. C. Peters, 94 S.W.(2d) 129, a companion case.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.'
**EXHIBIT 10.2
GUARANTY OF LEASEAND LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT
          THIS **GUARANTY OF LEASE AND LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT**(this "**Guaranty**") is executed as of April 9, 2002 by **Alterra Healthcare Corporation**, a Delaware corporation ("**Guarantor**"), in favor of the **Entities Listed on Schedule 1** (collectively, "**Landlord**").**R E C I T A L S          **A.**        Landlord and **ALS Leasing, Inc.**, a Delaware corporation ("**ALS Leasing**"), and **Assisted Living Properties, Inc.**, a Kansas corporation ("**ALP**" and, collectively with ALS Leasing, "**Tenant**"), have entered into that certain Master Lease of even date herewith (the "**Lease**") whereby Landlord has agreed to lease to Tenant the Premises, as more specifically set forth in the Lease.  All initially capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Lease.          **B.        **Landlord and Tenant have entered into that certain Letter of Credit Agreement (the "**Letter of Credit Agreement**") of even date herewith, whereby Tenant has agreed to post and maintain a letter of credit as partial collateral for Tenant's obligations under the Lease, as more particularly set forth therein.          **C.**        It is a condition to Landlord's obligations under the Lease that the Guarantor execute and deliver this Guaranty.**A G R E E M E N T S          **NOW, THEREFORE**, in consideration of Landlord entering into the Lease with Tenant, and other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Guarantor agrees as follows:          1.        **Guaranty.**          Guarantor hereby absolutely and unconditionally guarantees to Landlord the following (collectively, the "**Guaranteed Obligations**"):               (a)        payment in full by Tenant of all Rent (including, without limitation, Minimum Rent and Manlius Debt Service) and other charges, reserves and other amounts due under the Lease in the manner and at the time prescribed in the Lease;                (b)        the full, complete and timely performance by Tenant of all covenants, indemnities and other obligations under the Lease including, without limitation, any indemnity or other obligation of Tenant which survives the expiration or earlier termination of the Lease;******
EXHIBIT 23
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statements (Nos. 333-131604 and 333-129004 on Form
S-3 and 333-100398, 333-70440, 333-45856, 333-45852, 333-66239, 333-15957,
33-92966, 33-80588, 33-50198, and 333-15961 on Form S-8) of our reports dated
March 28, 2011, relating to the financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Retail Ventures, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
“Company”) (which reports express an unqualified opinion and
include an explanatory paragraph relating to the retrospective application of
the new accounting guidance on accounting for convertible debt instruments that
may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) and
new accounting guidance on accounting for noncontrolling interests in
consolidated financial statements, which became effective February 1,
2009), and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the
Company for the year ended January 29, 2011. /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Columbus, Ohio 
May 20, 2011
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8



                       SCHEDULE OF HEALTH CARE REIT LEASES
                  WHICH ARE SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM OF LEASE
                 ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT 10.7 TO THE COMPANY'S FORM
                       10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 6/30/99

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         LEASING           ORIGINAL HEALTH CARE
FACILITY NAME                      LOCATION                           COMMITMENT FEE         REIT INVESTMENT       ANNUAL BASE RENT
-------------                      --------                           --------------         ---------------       ----------------
<S>                                <C>                                <C>                  <C>                     <C>
Alterra Clare Bridge               6101 Pointe West Boulevard           $ 355,000              $ 3,550,000             $ 355,000
  of Bradenton                     Bradenton, FL  34209

Clare Bridge of Sarasota           8450 McIntosh Road                    365,000                3,650,000               365,000
                                   Sarasota, FL
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,476
<SECURITIES>                                     2,130
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,983
<ALLOWANCES>                                       488
<INVENTORY>                                      6,891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,695
<PP&E>                                           6,203
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,049
<BONDS>                                          8,221
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,952
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,223
<SALES>                                         15,905
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,227
<CGS>                                            9,063
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,842
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (177)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,679)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        88
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,767)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,767)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1




                                   EXHIBIT 22

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


The subsidiaries listed below are directly or indirectly wholly-owned and all
are consolidated in the financial statements.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        STATE OR COUNTRY
                                            IN WHICH
SUBSIDIARY NAME                    INCORPORATED OR ORGANIZED
---------------                    -------------------------
<S>                                    <C>
Alumitech, Inc.                        Delaware

Aluminum Waste Technology, Inc.        Delaware

AWT Properties, Inc.                   Ohio

ETS Schaefer Corporation               Ohio

The Feldspar Corporation               North Carolina

Pyron Corporation                      New York

Pyron Metal Powders, Inc.              Delaware

Suzorite Mica Products Inc.            Ontario, Canada

Suzorite Mineral Products, Inc.        Delaware

Zemex Industrial Minerals, Inc.        Delaware
</TABLE>
..' 

m?nJe .. 


moran 


March 19.2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

. United States Department of Transportation 


1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 


Washington, DC 20590 


OlJtoDear Secretary laHood: V\1~"" t:.;!U!. (.,.Ol)!f,: ,I.)<':~.~:. 10Z(·hj.;. (._,:'i(1~'.li·, 

III!UOIC? ':;)6hf,be'fthlt~f Plante &. M~r~~PLLC.Yam writing to express our strong support fo~ the . 

application of Delta Air Lines for new nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda. 

' .. i:'jJ<t .... ~pproyal of Delta's new service would be a m~jor benefit for our region, where many 

~~T,~ratJ.ons have strong trade and market presence With Japan. There are almost 250 Japanese 

et)mpantes'tocated in Indiana and hundreds more whose business activities rely on access to 

Japan and its market. The growth of our business ties with Japan has created demand for 

increased capacity to Tokyo. Indiana corporate representatives look to the convenience of flying 

into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. 

Indianapolis does not offer international service to Asia, and many of our business 

travelers use Detroit as their hub when flying to Japan. Detroit is a proven and successful 

gateway to Asia and is an airport that can support trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is 

adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to 

makeit the airline's gateway to Asia. Th~nidditiOhofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that 

would clearly benefit our region. 

Thank you for consideration of this request. 

',; J.: p~ 

!~. , i" 

''/ 'I , 

. ,:/,,', :. 'f:>_::;,,< _ '"-~'-(~ . :}:--~fl-~~ ~,(~~'! 'l 

Illlnol& ChicagO', Elgin Michigan Ann Arbor· Auburn HIIIs'~ betrolt ."East lansing 

Flint • Grand Rapids • Kalamazoo • Macomb • St. Joseph • Southfield • Traverse City 

Ohlop/eveland • Columbus • Toledo China Shanghai Mextco Monterrey plantemoran.oom
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

RONALD STEPHEN SATTERFIELD, ) C/A NO. 03A01-9805-CV-00162 

# FILED
October 13, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk SR., ) ) Plaintiff-Appellee, ) )
) v. ) APPEAL AS OF RIGHT FROM THE ) KNOX COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ) ) ) ) GARY LONG and ) RICHARD M. SMITH, ) ) HONORABLE DALE C. WORKMAN, Defendants-Appellants.) JUDGE



## CONCURRING OPINION
I concur in the majority opinion authored by Judge Goddard. I write separately to disassociate myself from the following statement in the opinion: “ It is well-settled...that expert opinions must be based upon a reasonable degree of certainty. ”I adhere to the position expressed by me in the case of Reel v. Crawley , C/A No. 03A01-9402-CV-00071, 1994 WL 399566 (Tenn.App. E.S., filed at

Page 1Knoxville August 2, 1994) (Susano, concurring opinion). In

that case, I opined that an “ expert ’ s testimony that the nexus between an event and an injury is probable or, stated a different way, more likely than not, is all that is or should be required. ”Having said this, I hasten to add that I agree with the majority ’ s conclusion that Dr. Justice ’ s testimony was speculative and that the trial court acted within its discretion in refusing to allow it into evidence.

_____________________________ Charles D. Susano, Jr., J.

Page 2
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00666

- CV

CITY OF EDCOUCH, TEX AS

v. JOEL SEGURA
On Appeal from the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. C

- 4204

- 18

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this caus e on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance. January 10, 20 19
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

ERIC ARMS, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 529 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED. 

Justices Eakin and Donohue did not participate in the consideration or decision 

of this matter.
ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                          Subsidiaries
                                
                           Exhibit 21




                                               State of
Parent and Subsidiary*                      Incorporation

Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.            New York

  Rockland Electric Company                    New Jersey

     Saddle River Holdings Corp.               Delaware

       NORSTAR Holdings, Inc.                  Delaware

          NORSTAR Management, Inc.             Delaware
          Millbrook Holdings, Inc.             Delaware

       Atlantic Morris Broadcasting, Inc.      Delaware

       Compass Resources, Inc.                 Delaware

       Palisades Energy Services, Inc.         Delaware

  Pike County Light & Power                    Pennsylvania

  Clove Development Corporation                New York

  O&R Energy Development, Inc.                 Delaware

  O&R Development, Inc.                        Delaware


* Each level of indentation represents subsidiary status of the
  company under which it is immediately indented.
This Certificate certifies that 

Wolfgang Weber

Having satisfactorily completed the course of study

And having passed the required examination in Flying,Controlling, 

Maneuvering and FAA Rules & Regulations is a

Qualified for UAV Flight 

Given under my hand on the 25th Day of November, 2015

Ken Taboh
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 125 (Monday, June 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 36860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15314]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent to Rule on Request To Release Deed Restrictions 
at the Yellowstone Airport, West Yellowstone, Montana

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice To Rescind a Notice of Intent to Rule on Request to 
Release Deed Restrictions at the Yellowstone Airport, West Yellowstone, 
Montana.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration is issuing this notice to 
advise the public that, effective immediately, it is rescinding the 
Notice of Intent to rule on the request to release deed restrictions at 
Yellowstone Airport under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. Section 
47125 that was published on January 28, 2014. A re-opening and 
extension of the comment period was published on March 14, 2014. This 
rescission is due to the comments received regarding this notice. The 
request to release the deed restrictions may be reconsidered after 
further analysis and a Notice of Intent would be published at a later 
date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David S. Stelling, Manager, 
Federal Aviation Administration, Northwest Mountain Region, Airports 
Division, Helena Airports District Office, 2725 Skyway Drive, Suite 2, 
Helena, Montana 59602.

    Issued in Helena, Montana, on June 24, 2014.
David S. Stelling,
Manager, Helena Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 2014-15314 Filed 6-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.17





                   SCHEDULE OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENTS
      WHICH ARE SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT
                        ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT 10.16 TO THE
                               COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
                          FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 3/31/99




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                           DATE OF
FACILITY TYPE                         LOCATION                                MANAGEMENT FEE         MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
-------------                         --------                                --------------         --------------------
<S>                                   <C>                                          <C>                <C> 
Clare Bridge                          Louisville, Colorado                         7.5%               December 31, 1998

Clare Bridge                          Highland Ranch, Colorado                     7.5%               December 31, 1998

Sterling Cottage                      Savannah, Georgia                            7.5%               December 31, 1998

Sterling House                        Raleigh, North Carolina                      7.5%               December 31, 1998

Sterling Cottage                      Raleigh, North Carolina                      7.5%               December 31, 1998

Sterling House                        Hilton Head, South Carolina                  7.5%               December 31, 1998

Sterling Cottage                      Hilton Head, South Carolina                  7.5%               December 31, 1998

Clare Bridge                          Brandon, Florida                             7.5%               December 31, 1998

Clare Bridge                          Brick Ocean, New Jersey                      8.0%                 March 31, 1999

Sterling House                        Florence, New Jersey                         8.0%                 March 31, 1999

Clare Bridge                          Cape Coral, Florida                          8.0%                 March 31, 1999

Clare Bridge                          Scottsdale, Arizona                          8.0%                 March 31, 1999

Crossings                             Scottsdale, Arizona                          8.0%                 March 31, 1999

Sterling Cottage                      Bakersfield, California                      8.0%                 March 31, 1999

Sterling House                        Bakersfield, California                      8.0%                 March 31, 1999

Clare Bridge                          Tropicana, Nevada                            8.0%                 March 31, 1999
</TABLE>