alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 1997 and the Consolidated
Statement of Income for the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          4,630
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  80,066
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,628
<INVENTORY>                                    20,560
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              110,282
<PP&E>                                        726,713
<DEPRECIATION>                                 77,888
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                911,596
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         150,835
<BONDS>                                       279,383
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          510
<OTHER-SE>                                    369,175
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  911,596
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              333,510
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 255,831
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (1,234)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   91
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14,663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                64,250
<INCOME-TAX>                                   25,442
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            38,808
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   77,426
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.51


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             603
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,966
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,164,046
<DEPRECIATION>                                 232,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,043,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,632,490
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           484
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,095,680
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,043,648
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,639
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                85,233
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,646
<INCOME-TAX>                                        73
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  6,479
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,052
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ICG COMMUNICATIONS,  INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                              429,418
<SECURITIES>                         41,000
<RECEIVABLES>                       139,394
<ALLOWANCES>                         14,377
<INVENTORY>                           3,259
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    608,916
<PP&E>                              963,649
<DEPRECIATION>                      158,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,704,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               156,532
<BONDS>                           1,613,526
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               454,192
<PREFERRED>                            0<F1>
<COMMON>                                596
<OTHER-SE>                         (520,689)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       1,704,157
<SALES>                                0<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    275,991
<CGS>                                  0<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       187,964
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    194,475
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      8,538
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  121,974
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (210,307)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (251,081)
<DISCONTINUED>                      (48,174)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0<F1>
<CHANGES>                              0<F1>
<NET-INCOME>                       (299,255)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (6.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>THIS VALUE IS NOT APPLICABLE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smith Barney Mid-West Futures Fund L.P. II (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer andDirector     Date: May 16,2005

----
Docket No: FAA - 2014 - 1043 Dir ID: 2013 - NM - 079 -AD
EXHIBIT 10.01

AMENDMENT NO. 1  TO THE  WELLPOINT 401(k) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN  (As Amended Through January 1, 2001)

The WellPoint 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan is amended effective as of June 1, 2001 as follows:

1.  A
new Section 3.16 is added to Article III to read:



2.  "Appendix VII:
Participating Companies" is amended to include Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc.

3.  A
new Appendix XI is added at the end of the Plan to read:

APPENDIX XI:
MERGER OF BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF GEORGIA, INC.
TAX-FAVORED SAVINGS PROGRAM



1

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, WellPoint Health Networks Inc. caused this Amendment to be executed this 8th day of May, 2001.

| |  | WELLPOINT HEALTH NETWORKS INC.
| |  | ------------------------------
| |  | By:                           

2

---

QuickLinks
#### MASTERSON et al. v. BINGHAM.

No. 9782.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Galveston.

May 10, 1935.

Rehearing Denied May 23, 1935.

J. E. Price, of Houston, for appellant Bassett Blakely.

Cole, Cole, Patterson & Kemper, of Houston (Robt. L. Cole, of Houston,, of counsel), for appellee. ,:

PLEASANTS, Chief Justice.

This case, which came to this court on appeal from a district court of Harris county, was submitted for decision in October, 1932, and was considered and decided on November 3, 1932, on which date the court rendered and entered a judgment in favor of appellants, reversing and rendering the judgment of the trial court. ,

Thereafter, on November 16, 1932, the appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that this court had obtained no jurisdiction to hear and determine the appeal. This motion is based on the showing by the record that the judgment of the trial court had become final before the motion for new trial was determined by the trial court, and that court having no jurisdiction to decide the motion at the time it entered its order refusing the new trial, the appeal bond, which was filed in October, 1932, six months after the judgment became final, was not filed in time to invoke the jurisdiction of this court. Much water has run under the mill since this motion to dismiss was filed. Thomas v. Murphy et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) 70 S.W. (2d) 1020; Thomason et al. v. Wiebusch (Tex. Civ. App.) 73 S.W. (2d) 142; Dallas Storage & Warehouse Co. v. Taylor (Tex. Sup.) 77 S.W. (2d) 1031; Millers Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Wilkirson (Tex. Sup.) 77 S.W. (2d) 1035.

The motion is determinable on the proper construction of subdivision 28, art. 2092, Revised Statutes of 1925, as amended by Acts of 5th Called Session, 1930, c. 70, § 1, of the Legislature (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 2092, subd. 28).

When we first came to consider the motion, action thereon was postponed, as suggested by appellee in the motion, to await *296final determination by the Supreme Court of the case of Millers’ Mutual Fire Ins. Co. *v.*Wilkirson, supra, then pending in that sourt on writ of error, which case present-id the exact question presented by this mo-rion.

' That case having been finally determined by the Supreme Court on December 31, 1934, 77 S.W. (2d) 1035, in favor of appel-lee’s contention that this court had acquired no jurisdiction to hear and determine the appeal, the motion has been granted, our judgment in the case set aside, and the appeal dismissed.

Motion granted.
#### LANDRUM v. STATE.

No. 20042.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 21, 1938.

Gray & Pope, of Tyler, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*634KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for chicken theft; punishment is asesssed at a fine of $50.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or *bills*of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and all procedural matters seem to be in due order.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by' the Court.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-67690), S-8 (No. 333-59580), S-8 (No.333-57310), S-8 (No. 333-45396), S-8 (No. 333-83073), S-8 (No. 333-90732), S-8 (No. 333-106121), S-8 (No. 333-117947), S-3 (No. 333-112030) and S-3 (No. 333-118698) of Paradyne Networks, Inc. of our report dated March 11, 2005 relating to thefinancial statements, financial statement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 15, 2005 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Tampa, Florida

March 15, 2005
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 4, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131593(27) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, LOUIS ARTHUR LAFFIN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131593 

 COA: 266299 

Oakland CC: 1999-620238-DM 

MARIZA LAFFIN, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 

29, 2006 order is considered, and it is GRANTED. We VACATE our order dated 

November 26, 2006. On reconsideration, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 

2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted. 

d0328 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 4, 2007 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 76329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31063]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No.: 09/79-0416]


Notice of Surrender of License

    Notice is hereby given that Sundance Venture Partners II, L.P., 
located at 5030 E. Sunrise Drive, Suite 200, Phoenix, Arizona 85044, 
has surrendered its license to operate as a small business investment 
company under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended 
(the Act). Sundance Venture Partners II, L.P., was licensed by the 
Small Business Administration on 05/04/98. Under the authority vested 
by the Act and pursuant to the Regulations promulgated thereunder, the 
surrender was acted on this date, and accordingly, all rights, 
privileges and franchises derived therefrom have been terminated.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59.11, Small 
Business Investment Companies)

    Dated: November 29, 2000.
Donald A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 00-31063 Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 10.5 to Biodrain Medical, Inc. Form S-1





Exhibit 10.5  


Exhibit A


 


NONDISCLOSURE AND NONCOMPETE AGREEMENT


 


Nondisclosure and Noncompetition.


 


(a) At all times while this agreement is in force and after its expiration or termination, Lawrence W. Gadbaw (“Employee”) agrees to refrain from disclosing BioDrain Medical, Inc.’s (“Company”) customer lists, trade secrets, or other confidential material. Employee agrees to take reasonable security measures to prevent accidental disclosure and industrial espionage.


 


(b) While this agreement is in force, Employee agrees to use his best efforts to carry out the position of Executive Vice President of Corporate Development and to abide by the nondisclosure and noncompetition terms of this agreement. After expiration or termination of this agreement, Mr. Gadbaw agrees not to compete with Company for a period of two (2) years. This prohibition will not apply if this agreement is terminated because Company violated the term of this agreement.


 


Competition means owning or working for a business of the following type: medical device dedicated to fluid management in medical environments to include, but not be limited to, operating rooms, emergency rooms, day surgery center, patient rooms, ambulances.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BioDrain Medical, Inc. and Lawrence W. Gadbaw have signed this agreement.


 


BIODRAIN MEDICAL, INC.


 





	
By
 	

 
 
	
Its
 	
CFO
 
	
 
 	
 
 
	
 
 	

 
 
	
 
 	
Lawrence W. Gadbaw
 
	
 
 	
 
 
	
Date:
 	
10-18-06
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                          5

<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1,000

<S>                                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                           133
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  3,305
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                    5,214
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              10,171
<PP&E>                                                        36,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                                14,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                36,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         19,611
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          1,335
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                          32
<OTHER-SE>                                                    14,654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  36,204
<SALES>                                                        3,312
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              22,334
<CGS>                                                         14,047
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 13,093
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             1,102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                2,999
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   1,107
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            1,892
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  178
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   2,070
<EPS-BASIC>                                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    .65



</TABLE>
Denied and Opinion Filed July 1 8 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00827
- CV IN RE BABAK TAHERZAD EH , Relator Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F16
- 12037 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Carlyle In this original proceeding, relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the distr ict court to return to relator all costs, fees, fines, penalties, and expenses paid by relator in the underlying proceeding. We deny the petition. To establish a right to mandamus relief in a criminal case, the relator must show that the trial court violat ed a ministerial duty and there is no adequate remedy at law. In re State ex rel. Weeks , 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). “Due to the extraordinary nature of the remedy, the right to mandamus relief generally requires a predic ate request for action by the respondent, and the respondent’s erroneous refusal to act.” In re Coppola , 535 S.W.3d 506, 510 (Tex. 2017) (orig. proceeding)

. A s the party seeking relief, the relator has the burden of providing the Court with a sufficient ma ndamus record to establish his right to mandamus relief. Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Rules 52.3 and 52.7 require the relator to provide “a certified or sworn copy” of certain documents, including any order– 2

–

complain ed of, any other document showing the matter complained of, and every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief that was filed in any underlying proceeding. T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1). Rule 52.3(h), in turn, requires the pe tition to “contain a clear and concise argument for the contentions made, with appropriate citations to authorities and to the appendix or record.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3(h). The petition must also include other information, including a statement of the case , a statement of jurisdiction, and a statement of facts. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3. Here, relator’s petition does not include an appendix or mandamus record as required by rules 52.3 and 52.7 and meets none of the other requirements of rule 52.3. This petition is insufficient to establish that relator asked the trial court to return to relator all costs, fees, fines, penalties, and expenses paid by relator and that the trial court has either refused to act within a reasonable time or erroneously denied the relief requested

. As such, relator has not established a violation of a ministerial duty and is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

190827F.P05 /Cory L. Carlyle/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6372

MICHAEL A. BAYLOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LARRY A. WASHINGTON; L. JOHNSON, Lieutenant;

THOMAS CORCORAN; K.O. WILLIAMS, Sergeant;

WILLIAM SMITH; DOCTOR PETERS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00-

384-L)

Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 23, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. Baylor, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Gloria Wilson Shelton, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Baylor appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to the Defendants and denying relief on his 42

U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Baylor v. Washington, No. CA-00-384-L (D. Md. Feb. 15,

2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED