alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion of the Procuradora de la Administracion of the Republic of Panama



 EXHIBIT 4(4) 







 [Letterhead of Procuraduría de la Administración] 
  
 Panamá, 27 de octubre de 2004. 
  
 Dr. Ricaurte Vásquez Morales 
 Minister of Economy and Finance 
 of the Republic of Panama 
 P.O. Box 2694, Zona 3 
 Panama, Republic of Panama 
  
 Dear Minister Vásquez: 
  
 I am the Procuradora de la Administración of the Republic of Panama (the “Republic”) and have served as
counsel to the Republic in connection with the Republic’s Registration Statement (the “Registration Statement”), and the forms of the Underwriting Agreement and the Fiscal Agency Agreement incorporated as Exhibits 4(1) and 4(2)
thereto (the “Agreements”), pursuant to which the Republic is registering certain securities (the “Securities”) to be offered and sold from time to time as set forth in the Registration Statement. 
  
 The filing of this Registration Statement has been authorized pursuant to
Cabinet Decree No. 37, dated October 20, 2004 (the “Cabinet Decree”). 
  
 It is my opinion that when the Securities have been (i) duly authorized, issued, executed and delivered by the Republic and authenticated pursuant to the Cabinet Decree, and (ii) delivered and paid for as contemplated
by the Agreements and the Prospectus (including, without limitation, the applicable Prospectus Supplement and any amendment and supplement thereto), the Securities will constitute valid and legally binding obligations of the Republic under the laws
of the Republic. 
  
 I hereby consent to the filing of this
opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and to the use of my name under the heading “Validity of the Securities” in the Registration Statement. In giving the foregoing consent, I do not thereby admit that I am 
 in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations of the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission. 
  
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	 /s/    Alma Montenegro de Fletcher


	 Alma Montenegro de Fletcher
 Procuradora
General de la Administración
 of the Republic of Panama
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.30A

                                    AGREEMENT


         On this ___ day of July, 1997, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.
(hereinafter the "Company") and G.D. Caliendo (hereinafter the "Executive")
enter into this Agreement effective July 1, 1997.

         WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company are parties to a letter
agreement dated February 16, 1995 and a letter agreement dated April 6, 1995
(individually and collectively the "Letter Agreement(s)"); and

         WHEREAS, paragraph "3" of the April 6, 1995 Letter Agreement was
intended to amend the Officers' Supplemental Retirement Plan of Orange and
Rockland Utilities, Inc. (the "Plan") to provide for the inclusion of incentive
compensation in the calculation of Executive's benefit under the Plan on an
accelerated incremental basis commensurate with years of service with the
Company; and

         WHEREAS, the Plan has recently been amended to reflect that the
definition of "Compensation" under the Plan shall include all incentive
compensation that an Officer was/is eligible to earn under the Company's Annual
Team Incentive Plan at target, effective January 1, 1995; and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to amend the Letter
Agreements so as to reflect these recent changes to the Plan.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive agree as follows:

         1. Effective January 1, 1995, the benefit to which Executive may be
entitled under the Plan, as determined under the terms and conditions of the
Plan, shall be calculated to include 100% of the Annual Team Incentive Plan
award that Executive is eligible to earn at target in an applicable year, in
accordance with the definition of "Compensation" under Section 2(9)(B) of the
Plan, as amended and restated on June 5, 1997 and effective July 1, 1997.
Paragraph "3" of the April 6, 1995 Letter Agreement is hereby superseded by this
paragraph.

<PAGE>   2



         2. Nothing in this Agreement is intended, nor shall this Agreement be
construed, to in any way amend or limit the accelerated vesting provisions in
the Letter Agreements.

         3. To the extent the terms of the Letter Agreements conflict with the
terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.



     ----------------------------             ----------------------------
                 G. D. Caliendo                     James F. O'Grady, Jr.
                                                    Chairman, Compensation
                                                            Committee
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, V. Bryan Lawlis, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Aradigm Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     /s/ V. BRYAN LAWLIS     V. Bryan Lawlis  *President and Chief Executive Officer*   Dated: November 10, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>































































                                    <PAGE>

<ARTICLE>       5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000,000
       
<S>                               <C>        
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<CASH>                                     68
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                           1,606
<ALLOWANCES>                              131
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        2,345
<PP&E>                                 26,688
<DEPRECIATION>                         15,608
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         13,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   3,442
<BONDS>                                 4,608
<COMMON>                                  225
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                              2,886
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           13,899
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        8,862
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        6,939
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1,538
<INCOME-TAX>                              569
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         3,360
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            2,391
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 273/2015

| | ISSN 1977-1002 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 273 |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Tom 5818 sierpnia 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1002

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 273

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Tom 5818 sierpnia 2015

---

| Powiadomienie nr | Spis treśći | Strona |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Sprostowania |
| 2015/C 273/01 | Sprostowanie do stanowiska Rady (UE) nr 10/2015 w pierwszym czytaniu w sprawie przyjęcia rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady zmieniającego rozporządzenie Rady (WE) nr 515/97 w sprawie wzajemnej pomocy między organami administracyjnymi państw członkowskich i współpracy między państwami członkowskimi a Komisją w celu zapewnienia prawidłowego stosowania przepisów prawa celnego i rolnego – Przyjęte przez Radę w dniu 15 czerwca 2015 r.( Dz.U. C 239 z 21.7.2015 ) | 1 |

Powiadomienie nr

Spis treśći

Strona

Sprostowania

2015/C 273/01

Sprostowanie do stanowiska Rady (UE) nr 10/2015 w pierwszym czytaniu w sprawie przyjęcia rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady zmieniającego rozporządzenie Rady (WE) nr 515/97 w sprawie wzajemnej pomocy między organami administracyjnymi państw członkowskich i współpracy między państwami członkowskimi a Komisją w celu zapewnienia prawidłowego stosowania przepisów prawa celnego i rolnego – Przyjęte przez Radę w dniu 15 czerwca 2015 r.( Dz.U. C 239 z 21.7.2015 )

( Dz.U. C 239 z 21.7.2015 )

1

---

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

Sprostowania

| 18.8.2015 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | C 273/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2015

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

C 273/1

---

Sprostowanie do stanowiska Rady (UE) nr 10/2015 w pierwszym czytaniu w sprawie przyjęcia rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady zmieniającego rozporządzenie Rady (WE) nr 515/97 w sprawie wzajemnej pomocy między organami administracyjnymi państw członkowskich i współpracy między państwami członkowskimi a Komisją w celu zapewnienia prawidłowego stosowania przepisów prawa celnego i rolnego – Przyjęte przez Radę w dniu 15 czerwca 2015 r.

(
  Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 239 z dnia 21 lipca 2015 r.
  )

(2015/C 273/01)

Strona 10, art. 1 pkt 15:

Dodaje się literę w brzmieniu:

| „c) | skreśla się ust. 3;”. |
| --- | --- |

„c)

skreśla się ust. 3;”.

---
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Zemex Corporation (the Corporation)
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Allen
J. Palmiere, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that, to my knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.

| |  |     |  |                                                                                                 
| |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |     |  |                                                                                                 
| |  | By: |  | /s/ ALLEN J. PALMIERE                                                                           
| |  |     |  |                                                                                                 
| |  |     |  | Allen J. Palmiere
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
March 27, 2003
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2536 

To make daylight savings time permanent for the State of Florida, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2018 

Mr. RUBIO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To make daylight savings time permanent for the State 

of Florida, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sunshine State Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. MARKING DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME PERMANENT 

6 FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Act of March 19, 

8 1918, (commonly known as the ‘‘Calder Act’’) (15 U.S.C. 

9 261) is amended— 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2536 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a), in the second sentence, by 

2 inserting ‘‘in subsection (c) of this section and’’; 

3 (2) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub4 section (c); and 

5 (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(b) EXCEPTION.—The standard time of the State 

8 of Florida shall be Coordinated Universal Time retarded 

9 by 4 hours.’’. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3 of the 

11 Uniform Time Act of 1966 (15 U.S.C. 260a) is amended 

12 by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(d) EXEMPTION.—This section shall not apply to 

14 the State of Florida.’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.3

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
Southern California Gas Company (the "Company") certifies that:

(i)	the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



February 23, 2005
                                                /S/ EDWIN A. GUILES
                                              ______________________
                                               Edwin A. Guiles
                                               Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHANE G. SPEROW,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 134 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
1 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. -1- United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 26, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________________ No. 03 - 60655 SUMMARY CALENDAR

_________________________ RUPERTO GUTIERREZ-MORALES,

Petitioner,

v. JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

______________________________________________________________________________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A91-283-466

______________________________________________________________________________ Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 In this appeal, we review the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision denying Ruperto Gutierrez-Morales’ motion to reopen his removal proceedings and refusing to accept his untimely application for cancellation of removal. Gutierrez-Morales argues that the Immigration Judge violated his due process rights by refusing to accept his untimely application for cancellation of removal and by denying his motion-2-

to reopen. Gutierrez-Morales also argues that the arrest which prompted his removal was illegal. Gutierrez-Morales waived the opportunity to submit his application for cancellation of removal when he missed the imposed filing deadline. 8 C.F.R. § 3.31(c) (2003). His motion to reopen was properly denied because he was informed of his right to apply for cancellation of removal, and he was provided an opportunity to do so. 8 C.F.R. § 3.23(b)(3) (2002). Thus, the Immigration Judge did not violate Gutierrez-Morales’ due process rights. Gutierrez-Morales’ challenge to his arrest does not warrant relief because even if he could demonstrate that his arrest was illegal, it would have no bearing on the validity of his subsequent removal. I.N.S. v. Lopez-Mendoza , 468 U.S. 1032, 1040 (1984). Gutierrez-Morales’ petition for review is therefore denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FIRSTCITY LIQUIDATING TRUST SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 FORM 10-Q FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FIRSTCITY LIQUIDATING
TRUST SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          11,219
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    108,095
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              976
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           61,327
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,314
<SALES>                                         36,490
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,127
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,663
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,139
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,139
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,139
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
      a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 /s/ Nancy E. PecotaNancy E. PecotaVice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

WADE HAMPTON TURNER, III, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-2266 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. )

) Opinion filed September 30, 2020. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Ramiro Mañalich, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Kimberly Nolen Hopkins, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.