alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 99


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line
Company (the "Company") for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Christopher A. Helms, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Thomas J. Webb, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of his knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ CHRISTOPHER A. HELMS
------------------------
Name:  Christopher A. Helms
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 24, 2003

/s/ THOMAS J. WEBB
------------------
Name:  Thomas J. Webb
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:  March 24, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Panhandle and will be retained by Panhandle and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       70
| INDIANA                                        | 35-1544218                        |
|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

|   | o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

|     Exhibit 99.1 | Slide presentation, utilized January 27, 2011, during conference call and web cast by First Merchants Corporation |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

| 99.1 |      Slide presentation, utilized January 27, 2011, during conference call and web cast by First Merchants Corporation |
|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YA JUN LIU,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73028

Agency No. A076-209-300

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 9, 2010

Deferred February 10, 2010

Resubmitted February 17, 2010

Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: FARRIS, D.W. NELSON and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Ya Jun Liu petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s

(“BIA”) decision denying her deferral of removal under the Convention Against

Torture (“CAT”). United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel,

Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Dec. 10, 1984, 1465 U.N.T.S.

FILED

FEB 24 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 We referred this case to mediation, subject to the respondent’s consent. 1

Respondent has opposed the referral and this case is now resubmitted.

2

85, 23 I.L.M. 1027. See Regulations Concerning the Convention Against Torture,

64 Fed. Reg. 8478-01 at 8482-83 (Feb. 19, 1999) (codified at various parts of 8

C.F.R.); 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.16-208.18 (1999). Liu conceded removability.1

Liu contends that, if she returns to China, she will be tortured and killed by

members of a criminal drug gang in reprisal for her cooperation with the United

States government, where she assisted in the capture and arrest of two gang

members and the identification of a third gang member. The BIA did not disturb

the immigration judge’s finding that Liu is more likely than not to be tortured if

she returns to China and we do not revisit that finding here; instead the BIA denied

CAT relief on the ground that Liu’s evidence was insufficient, as a matter of law,

to show Chinese government officials were more likely than not to acquiesce in her

torture.

We review the BIA’s answers to questions of law de novo, Brezilien v.

Holder, 569 F.3d 403, 411 (9th Cir. 2009), and we disagree.. Liu adduced the

following evidence: (1) her credible testimony regarding corruption in China; (2)

documentary evidence as to systemic corruption in China; (3) portions of the U.S.

State Department Country Report for China that related accounts of local
3

corruption regarding alien traffickers. In response, the government adduced

evidence from state-run newspapers that the Chinese government was cracking

down on drug trafficking. The government also introduced one article from the

BBC in 2000 reporting similar enforcement efforts against drug traffickers. Based

on our review of this evidence, we hold that Liu’s evidence was sufficient to meet

her burden of proof. Liu has shown, by a preponderance of the evidence, that

Chinese government officials are more likely than not to acquiesce in her torture if

she returns to China. See Zheng v. Ashcroft, 332 F.3d 1186 (9th Cir. 2003).

GRANTED.
|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |  |
| INDIANA                                        | 35-1544218 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

----

----

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21354]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 326 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-662, CP2024-671.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21354 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2538 

To prohibit an increase in duties on imports of steel and aluminum. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2018 

Mr. FLAKE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To prohibit an increase in duties on imports of steel and 

aluminum. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON INCREASES IN DUTIES ON IM4 PORTS OF STEEL AND ALUMINUM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, the rates of duty applicable to articles speci7 fied in subsection (b) under the Harmonized Tariff Sched8 ule of the United States (in this section referred to as the 

9 ‘‘HTS’’) on March 22, 2018, shall remain in effect on and 

10 after March 23, 2018, without regard to any presidential 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2538 IS

1 proclamation issued on March 8, 2018, or any other date 

2 relating to— 

3 (1) the report of the Secretary of Commerce on 

4 the Secretary’s investigation into the effect of im5 ports of steel articles on the national security of the 

6 United States transmitted to the President on Janu7 ary 11, 2018; or 

8 (2) the report of the Secretary of Commerce on 

9 the Secretary’s investigation into the effect of im10 ports of aluminum on the national security of the 

11 United States transmitted to the President on Janu12 ary 19, 2018. 

13 (b) ARTICLES SPECIFIED.—The articles specified in 

14 this subsection are the following: 

15 (1) Articles of steel classifiable under any of 

16 subheadings 7206.10 through 7216.50, 7216.99 

17 through 7301.10, 7302.10, 7302.40 through 

18 7302.90, or 7304.10 through 7306.90 of the HTS. 

19 (2) Unwrought aluminum classifiable under 

20 heading 7601 of the HTS. 

21 (3) Aluminum bars, rods, and profiles classifi22 able under heading 7604 of the HTS. 

23 (4) Aluminum wire classifiable under heading 

24 7605 of the HTS. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2538 IS

1 (5) Aluminum plates, sheets, strips classifiable 

2 under heading 7606 of the HTS. 

3 (6) Aluminum foil classifiable under heading 

4 7607 of the HTS. 

5 (7) Aluminum tubes and pipes classifiable 

6 under heading 7608 of the HTS. 

7 (8) Aluminum tube and pipe fittings classifiable 

8 under heading 7609 of the HTS. 

9 (9) Aluminum castings classifiable under statis10 tical reporting number 7616.99.51.60 of the HTS. 

11 (10) Aluminum forgings classifiable under sta12 tistical reporting number 7616.99.51.70 of the HTS. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
BARCLAYS OFFICIAL CALIFORNIA CODE OF

REGULATIONS

TITLE 13. MOTOR VEHICLES

DIVISION 3. AIR RESOURCES BOARD

CHAPTER 5. STANDARDS FOR MOTOR

VEHICLE FUELS

ARTICLE 2. STANDARDS FOR DIESEL FUEL

This database is current through 12/26/08, Register

2008, No. 52

§ 2285. Exemption from Diesel Fuel Requirements for

Military-Specification Fuels Used in Qualifying Military Vehicles.

(a) Exemption for military-specification fuel used in

qualifying military vehicles. The vehicular diesel fuel

standards in sections 2281, 2282, and 2284 do not apply

to military specification fuel that is sold, offered for

sale, supplied, offered for supply, stored, dispensed, or

transported for use in:

(1) Vehicles for which the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has granted a national security exemption

under 40 CFR § 85.1708 from motor vehicle emissions

standards under 40 CFR Part 86, or which are exempted

from regulation under 40 CFR § 85.1703(a)(3) because

of features ordinarily associated with military combat or

tactical vehicles such as armor and/or weaponry, or military tactical vehicles that are exempt from the California motor vehicle emission standards pursuant to section 1905, title 13, California Code of Regulations; or

(2) Tactical military motor vehicles that are not subject

to a national security exemption from motor vehicle

emission standards but for national security purposes

(for purposes of readiness for deployment overseas)

need to be fueled with the same fuel as motor vehicles

for which EPA has granted a national security exemption, provided that such fuel is:

(A) Used only in vehicles identified in section (a)(1)

or this section (a)(2);

(B) Segregated from non-exempt vehicle diesel fuel

at all points in the distribution system; and

(C) Dispensed from a fuel pump stand or tank that is

prominently labeled as containing fuel that is not lawful

for use in diesel vehicles other than excluded military

vehicles, or from a fueling truck. Any such fuel pump

stand or tank may also be labeled with the appropriate

designation of the fuel, such as "JP-8."

<General Materials (GM) - References, Annotations, or

Tables>

Note: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013,

43018 and 43101, Health and Safety Code; and Western

Oil and Gas Ass'n. v. Orange County Air Pollution Control District, 14 Cal. 3d 411, 121 Cal. Rptr. 249 (1975).

Reference: Sections 39000, 39001, 39002, 39003,

39500, 39515, 39516, 41511, 43000, 43016, 43018 and

43101, Health and Safety Code; and Western Oil and

Gas Ass'n. v. Orange County Air Pollution Control District, 14 Cal. 3d 411, 121 Cal. Rptr. 249 (1975).

HISTORY

1. New section filed 7-15-2004; operative 8-14-2004 (Register 2004, No. 29).

13 CCR § 2285, 13 CA ADC § 2285

13 CA ADC § 2285

END OF DOCUMENT

13 CA ADC § 2285 Page 1

13 CCR § 2285

Cal. Admin. Code tit. 13, § 2285

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 10.26 First Modification to Grant from the Space and Naval Warfare
Systems Command.

                                                     Grant No.: N65236-98-1-5400
                                                            MODIFICATION: P00001
                                                        DARPA Order No.: F854/01
                                                             Program Code: P8310
                                                     Effective Date: 18 DEC 1998

Grantor:   Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR)
           Systems Center Charleston
           P.O. Box 190022
           North Charleston, SC 29419-9022

Grantee:   Genelabs Technologies, Inc.
           505 Penobscot Drive
           Redwood City, CA 94063

Grantee Identification Numbers/Codes:

           DUNS No.:  180695348
           TIN:  94-3010150
           Cage Code:  0K7W3

Total Grant Amount:  $13,592,769.00

Accounting and Appropriation Data:

ACRN:  AB  9790400 1320 F854 P9310 2525 DPAM 9 0102 62383E S12123
              JO #BMUE5X9I17 DOC #HR00119999F854/AA
              REQ:  N65236-8337-8F08                             $4,810,871.00

Authority:  This Grant is issued pursuant to the authority of 10 U.S.C. 2358.


                                 GRANT SCHEDULE

The purpose of this modification is to provide for an increment of funding under
Grant N65236-98-1-5400. Effective as of the date of this modification:

1.  The amount of funding available under this Grant is hereby increased by the
    amount shown in the accounting and appropriation data set forth above.

2.  Revise Paragraph 7 to read as follows:


<PAGE>   2
"7. This Grant is incrementally funded. The total amount of this Grant is
$13,592,769.00. The amount currently available for payment is $8,586,856.00. The
Government's obligation for the difference of $5,005,913.00 is contingent upon
the availability of funds. Accordingly, no legal liability on the part of the
Government for payment of this difference shall exist unless and until funds are
made available to the Grantee by an amendment to the Grant.

                          FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
                          SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS COMMAND, 
                          SYSTEMS CENTER CHARLESTON

                          By:    /S/ GRANTS OFFICER           
                                 -------------------------------
                                 (Grants Officer)

                                 December 18, 1998            
                                 -------------------------------
                                 (Date)
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40167

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
GEORGE RAYMOND WILLIAMS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12

- CR

- 17 7

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS , and H IGGINSON , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * The judgment of the district court is affirmed. Contrary to defendant’ s contention , the sentence did not delegate to the probation officer the decision about mental health treatment. The judge during sentencing did indicate his intention to leave at least the ministerial details of the sentence to a probation officer; bu t counsel having pointed out a problem , the documented sentence is unobjectionable as it clarified that the
district court only deemed mental health treatment needed

.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 8, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40167 Document: 00512493343 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2014No. 13

- 40167
AFFIRMED

.

2 Case: 13-40167 Document: 00512493343 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/08/2014
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2631 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2631

To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, to require that 
the annual budget submissions of the President include the total dollar 
amount requested for intelligence or intelligence-related activities of 
       each element of the Government engaged in such activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 9, 2018

  Mr. Wyden (for himself and Mr. Paul) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, to require that 
the annual budget submissions of the President include the total dollar 
amount requested for intelligence or intelligence-related activities of 
       each element of the Government engaged in such activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Intelligence Budget Transparency Act 
of 2018''.

SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES OF EACH ELEMENT OF THE 
              GOVERNMENT.

    Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(40)(A) the total dollar amount proposed in the budget 
        for intelligence or intelligence-related activities of each 
        element of the Government engaged in such activities in the 
        fiscal year for which the budget is submitted and the estimated 
        amount required to be appropriated for each of the following 4 
        fiscal years.
            ``(B) In subparagraph (A), the term `element of the 
        Government' means each element of the intelligence community 
        (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 
        1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4))).''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, V. Bryan Lawlis, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Aradigm Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      /s/ V. BRYAN LAWLIS       V. Bryan Lawlis   *President and Chief Executive Officer*  
Dated: May 13, 2005
Exhibit 23 - Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-25979) pertaining to the Orbit International Corporation
1995 Employee Stock Option Plan and the Orbit International Corporation 1995
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors of our report dated March 5,
1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Orbit International Corp. included in the annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1997.



							/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


New York, New York
March 30, 1998



2