alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BATSON v. STATE.

No. 18488.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 28, 1936.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 13, 1937.

J. K. Russell and A. C. Chrisman, both of Cleburne, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for theft of property over the value of $50, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

Mr. B was the victim of the theft. He had weathered the storms of' nearly sixty winters, but even so, the evidence leaves it doubtful if he had yet arrived at the years of discretion. He fell into the company of appellant and M, another young woman. They all went to a tourist camp near Cleburne. B rented and paid for a cabin. He claims to have be-come somewhat indisposed from smoking cigarettes furnished by his companions, which cigarettes he claimed had been “doped.” He removed his shoes and trousers, placing the latter on a table at the foot of the bed. . In his trousers’ pocket was a billfold containing $69. He lay down on the bed. The evidence suggests that there may have been a more impelling reason for disrobing and getting in bed than the ones advanced by him. Appellant lay down on the bed with B and began to press her caresses upon him in such manner as to conceal from him the movements of her companion M. The conduct of appellant towards B was calculated to divert his mind from everything but the business which he thought was immediately at hand. While appellant was pressing her attention on him M extracted the billfold from his trousers pocket, whereupon appellant promptly ceased her attentions, seized B’s watch from the bed or table,, and both young women fled from the room, leaving B a disappointed and poorer man.

The record leaves no doubt that appellant and M were acting together in taking B’s property.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

In a delicate manner the facts upon which the prosecution is based are set forth in the original opinion. The charge of the court, in a comprehensive manner, left with the jury the decision of the important fact as to whether or not the appellant and Daisy Phillips Moreland acted together in a conspiracy to acquire the money of the injured party without his consent. No fault of the manner in which the facts of the case were submitted to the jury.is challenged by any bills of exception which can be considered on this appeal. Such bills of exception as were reserved by the appellant are not available for the reason that they were filed too late to justify their consideration. The court adequately charged on the law of reasonable doubt. The jury was also "instructed that the failure of the appellant to testify could not be considered as a circumstance against her.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14

                      SCHEDULE OF HEALTH CARE REIT LEASES
                  WHICH ARE SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM OF LEASE
                ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT 10.13 TO THE COMPANY'S FORM
                       10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 6/30/99

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       LEASING          ORIGINAL HEALTH CARE
FACILITY NAME                        LOCATION                       COMMITMENT FEE         REIT INVESTMENT         ANNUAL BASE RENT
-------------                        --------                       --------------      --------------------       ----------------
<S>                                  <C>                             <C>                   <C>                       <C>
Alterra Clare Bridge of Salem        1355 Boone Road, SE               $562,030               $5,620,298               $525,500
                                     Salem, OR 97306

Alterra Wynwood of Rochester         3035 Salem Meadows Dr.             666,711                6,667,105                620,048
                                     Rochester, MN 55902

Alterra Sterling House of            5011 Trotwood Avenue               263,562                2,635,620                245,338
Columbia                             Columbia, TN 38401

Alterra Clare Bridge of              #4 Walden Ridge Drive              369,268                3,692,675                344,487
Asheville                            Asheville, NC 28803

Alterra Sterling House of N.         105 North Hills Drive              339,000                3,390,000                269,171
Augusta                              N. Augusta, SC 29841

Alterra Clare Bridge of Adams        500 Seven Fields                   514,750                5,147,504                470,723
                                     Seven Fields, PA 16046

Alterra Clare Bridge of Everett      2015 Lake Heights Drive            687,620                6,876,202                627,180
                                     Everett, WA 98208

Alterra Clare Bridge of              3501 Converse Drive                320,094                3,200,939                298,322
Wilmington                           Wilmington, NC 28412

Alterra Sterling House of            1119 Perry Drive NW                239,810                2,398,100                236,753
Canton                               Canton, OH 44708

Alterra Sterling House of            2183 Memorial Drive                262,228                2,622,279                242,561
Clarksville                          Clarksville, TN 37043-4447
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICT Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Brennan, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |                                                
|-------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|August 7, 2008 |  | /s/ John J. Brennan                            
|               |  | John J. Brennan                                
|               |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 15.01

August
13, 2002

Securities
and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We
are aware that our report dated July 23, 2002 on our review of interim financial information of WellPoint Health Networks Inc. (the "Company") as of and for the period ended
June 30, 2002 and included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 333-05111, 333-33013, 333-42073, 333-81687, 333-90791, 333-37958, 333-55314, 333-81872 and 333-83462), Form S-3 (File No. 333-08519) and Form S-4 (File
No. 333-73382).

Very
truly yours,

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's financial statements included in the Company's Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               4,904
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      352,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        876,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,243,117
<PP&E>                                             927,574
<DEPRECIATION>                                     841,759
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,328,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,042,905
<BONDS>                                          1,218,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           964,394
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,896,767)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,328,932
<SALES>                                          2,897,999
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    75,572
<CGS>                                            2,822,427
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,618,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 125,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (720,671)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (720,671)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (720,671)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.42)
                                               


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATIONS

I, James B. Hovis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Phlo Corporation and
Subsidiaries;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 22, 2005


                  /s/ James B. Hovis
                  -------------------------------------------
                  James B. Hovis
                  Chief Executive Officer
                  Principal Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of WellPoint Health Networks Inc. (the“Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Leonard D. Schaeffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  November 14, 2003 | /s/ Leonard  D. Schaeffer |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                     | Leonard D.  Schaeffer     |
|                     | Chief  Executive Officer  |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, orother document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
registrant's  unaudited  consolidated  financial  statements as of September 30,
2000,  and the three  months then ended,  and is  qualified  in its  entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             4,350
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    195,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 199,704
<PP&E>                                         1,702,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                   122,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,778,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             97,938
<BONDS>                                          878,265
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                       802,716
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,778,919
<SALES>                                          191,335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 198,080
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    107,281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   3,513 <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                34,714
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   52,572
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               52,572
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      52,572
<EPS-BASIC>                                         1.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       1.69

<FN>
<F1>
Included in other  expenses are minority  interest  expense and  gain/(loss)  on
exchange of self-storage facilities
</FN>

</TABLE>
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 29 52

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Ch ris ti n Is ai ah Barn es , als o kno wn as Ch ris ti n B arn es -Sewe ll , als o k no wn as Ch ris ti n S ewel l-B arn es
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe llan t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Eas te rn Dis tri ctof M is so ur i - C ap e Gir ard eau

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Marc h 1 8, 2 01 8 Fi le d: Marc h 2 2, 2 01 8 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re BENTON, MURPHY, an d KELLY, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.Ch ris ti n B arn es di rect ly app eal s af te r he pl ead edgu il ty to m et ha m ph et am in e di st rib ut io n of

fen se s, a nd th e di st ric t co ur t se nt en ced hi m be lo w th e cal cu la te d 1 Gui de li ne s ran ge
. His co un se l ha s m ov ed fo r le av e to wit hd raw, an d ha s fil ed a br ie f

un de r And ers v. Cal ifo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7) , su gg es ti ng th a t t h e se nt en ce is

subs ta nt iv el y un reas on ab le

. Afte r care fu l rev ie w, we co nc lu de th at th e di st ric t co ur t di d no t im

po se a subs ta nt iv el y un reas on ab le se nt en ce. See Uni te d St at es v. Sal azar Alem an , 74 1 F.3 d 87 8, 88 1 (8 th Ci r. 20 13 ) (d is cu ss in g ap pe ll at e rev ie w of se nt en ci ng de ci si on s) ; se e al so Uni te d St at es v. Torr es -Ojeda , 82 9 F.3 d 10 27 , 10 30 (8 th C i r
. 20 16 ) (wh ere de fen da nt was se nt en ced be lo w advi so ry Gui de li ne s ran ge , it is ne arl y in co nc ei vabl e th atdi st ric t co urt ab us edit s d is cret io n i n n otvary in g d own ward st il l fu rth er).

Hav in g in de pe nd en tl y rev ie wed th e reco rd un de r Pen so n v. Ohi o, 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , we fin d no no nf r i v o lo us is su es fo r ap pe al

. Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm th e jud gm en t, an d we g ran t co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le St ep he n N. Lim baug h, Jr ., Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 East ern Dis tri ctof M is so ur i.
-2

-
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2576 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2576

     To require the Federal Communications Commission to conduct a 
proceeding to determine whether certain activities by licensees of the 
 Commission are undertakings under division A of subtitle III of title 
  54, United States Code, or major Federal actions under the National 
                   Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 20, 2018

   Mr. Moran introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To require the Federal Communications Commission to conduct a 
proceeding to determine whether certain activities by licensees of the 
 Commission are undertakings under division A of subtitle III of title 
  54, United States Code, or major Federal actions under the National 
                   Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reducing Antiquated Permitting for 
Infrastructure Deployments Act'' or the ``RAPID Act''.

SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGARDING 
              UNDERTAKINGS AND MAJOR FEDERAL ACTIONS.

    (a) Federal Communications Commission Determination.--
            (1) Definitions.--In this section--
                    (A) the term ``Commission'' means the Federal 
                Communications Commission; and
                    (B) the term ``radio station license'' has the 
                meaning given the term in section 3 of the 
                Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 153).
    (b) Proceeding Required.--Notwithstanding section 300320 of title 
54, United States Code, or section 102 of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332), not later than 180 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall complete a 
proceeding to determine--
            (1) the classes of activities of the entities to which the 
        Commission issues radio station licenses that do not constitute 
        an undertaking under such section 300320; and
            (2) the classes of activities of the entities to which the 
        Commission issues radio station licenses that do not constitute 
        a major Federal action under paragraph (2)(C) of such section 
        102.
                                 <all>
```