Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [A-533-871]
 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
 SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that producers and/or exporters subject to this administrative review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023. We are also rescinding the review with respect to 
                        ( print page 74885)
                        certain companies. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
 DATES: Applicable September 13, 2024.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Baker or Theodora Mattei, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2924 or (202) 482-4834, respectively.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On August 24, 2017, Commerce published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     the antidumping duty order on finished carbon steel flanges from India.[1]
                    
                     On August 2, 2023, Commerce published a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the 
                    *Order.*[2]
                    
                     On October 18, 2023, Commerce initiated an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on finished carbon steel flanges from India, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).[3]
                    
                     On December 11, 2023, Commerce selected Norma Group [4]
                    
                     and R. N. Gupta & Co., Ltd. (RNG) as mandatory respondents in this administrative review.[5]
                    
                     On April 10, 2024, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), Commerce extended the time period for issuing these preliminary results until no later than August 30, 2024.[6]
                    
                     On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in this administrative proceeding by seven days.[7]
                    
                     The deadline for these preliminary results is now September 6, 2024. For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, 
                    *see*
                     the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.[8]
                    
                     A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix I to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
                    *https://access.trade.gov.*
                     In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at 
                    *https://access.trade.gov/​public/​FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.* Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the 
                    *Order*
                     is finished carbon steel flanges. For a complete description of the scope of the 
                    *Order, see*
                     the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Rescission, in Part, of Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), Commerce will rescind an administrative review when there are no entries of subject merchandise during the POR for which liquidation is suspended.[9]
                    
                     Normally, upon completion of an administrative review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the assessment rate calculated for the review period.[10]
                    
                     Therefore, for an administrative review of a company to be conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry to be liquidated at the newly calculated assessment rate.[11] Based on our analysis of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) information, we determined that 27 companies had no entries of subject merchandise during the POR.[12]
                    
                     On December 15, 2023, we notified parties that we intended to rescind this administrative review with respect to the 27 companies, because those companies had no reviewable, suspended entries of subject merchandise; and we invited parties to comment.[13]
                    
                     No parties commented on the notification of intent to rescind the review, in part. Accordingly, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3) and (d)(4), we are rescinding the administrative review with respect to the 27 companies (listed in Appendix III of this notice) that had no reviewable, suspended entries of subject merchandise during the POR. Additionally, Aditya Forge Limited (Aditya), withdrew its request for a review of its entries. Therefore, because Aditya was the only company that requested a review of Aditya's entries, and it timely withdrew its request, we are rescinding the review with respect to Aditya in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).[14] Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Act. Export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying these preliminary results, 
                    *see*
                     the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Rate for Non-Selected Companies The Act and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not selected for individual examination in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally “an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any 
                    ( print page 74886)
                    zero or 
                    *de minimis*
                     margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available}.” In this administrative review, we preliminarily calculated weighted-average dumping margins for Norma Group and RNG that are not zero, 
                    *de minimis*
                     (
                    *i.e.,*
                     less than 0.5 percent), or determined entirely on the basis of facts available. Accordingly, consistent with guidance in section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, Commerce is preliminarily assigning to the companies not individually examined a margin of 2.89 percent, which is the weighted average of the dumping margins calculated for Norma Group margin and RNG based on publicly ranged U.S. sales values.[15]
                    
                     The companies not selected for individual examination are listed in Appendix II. Preliminary Results of Review Commerce preliminarily determines that the following estimated weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023: Producer/exporter
Weighted-average
                             dumping margin 
                             (percent)R. N. Gupta & Company Limited
4.00Norma (India) Limited/USK Exports Private Limited/Uma Shanker Khandelwal & Co./Bansidhar Chiranjilal
1.14Non-Selected Companies 16
2.89
 Disclosure and Public Comment Commerce intends to disclose to interested parties the calculations performed for these preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of this notice.[17]
                    
                     Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.[18]
                    
                     Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be filed no later than seven days after the date for filing case briefs.[19]
                    
                     Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) a statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.[20] As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior proceedings we have encouraged interested parties to provide an executive summary of their briefs that should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. In this review, we instead request that interested parties provide at the beginning of their briefs a public, executive summary for each issue raised in their briefs.[21]
                    
                     Further, we request that interested parties limit their public executive summary of each issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. We intend to use the public executive summaries as the basis of the comment summaries included in the issues and decision memorandum that will accompany the final results in this administrative review. We request that interested parties include footnotes for relevant citations in the public executive summary of each issue. Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).[22] Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, filed electronically via ACCESS, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) the party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; (3) whether any participant is a foreign national; and (4) a list of the issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs.[23]
                    
                     If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at a date and time to be determined. Parties should confirm the date and time of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. All briefs and hearing requests must be filed electronically using ACCESS and received successfully in their entirety by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised by the parties in any written briefs, no later than 120 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results. Assessment Rates Upon completion of this administrative review, Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If the weighted-average dumping margin for a mandatory respondent is not zero or 
                    *de minimis*
                     in the final results of this review, we will calculate an importer-specific assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for each importer's examined sales and the total entered value of such sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).[24]
                    
                     If the weighted-average dumping margin is zero or 
                    *de minimis*
                     in the final results of review, or if an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or 
                    *de minimis,*
                     Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.[25]
                    
                     For entries of subject merchandise during the period of review produced by the respondents for which they did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries pursuant to the reseller policy, 
                    *i.e.,*
                     the assessment rate for such entries will be the all-others rate established in the investigation if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.[26] For the companies which were not selected for individual examination, we intend to assign an antidumping duty assessment rate equal to the weighted-average dumping margin determined for 
                    ( print page 74887)
                    the non-examined companies in the final results of review. For the companies for which the administrative review is rescinded, antidumping duties shall be assessed at a rate equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (
                    *i.e.,*
                     within 90 days of publication). The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future cash deposits of estimated antidumping duties, where applicable.[27] Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for companies subject to this review will be equal to the company-specific weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by a company not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published in the completed segment for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-value investigation, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the most recently completed segment of the proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 8.91 percent, the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.[28]
                    
                     These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties, and/or an increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of countervailing duties. Notification to Interested Parties These preliminary results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: September 6, 2024. Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
 Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the 
                        *Order* IV. Rescission of Review, In Part IV. Rates for Non-Examined Companies V. Discussion of the Methodology VI. Currency Conversion VII. Recommendation Appendix II List of Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination 1. Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd. 2. C.D. Industries 3. Cetus Engineering Private Limited 4. Echjay Industries Pvt. Ltd. 5. JAI Auto Private Limited 6. Jiten Steel Industries. 7. Munish Forge Private Limited 8. R. D. Forge 9. Renin Piping Products 10. Rollwell Forge Engineering Components and Flanges 11. Rollwell Forge Pvt. Ltd. 12. Tirupati Forge Pvt. Ltd.; Tirupati Forge Appendix III Companies for Which Commerce Is Rescinding This Review 1. Adinath International 2. Aditya Forge Limited 3. Allena Group 4. Alloyed Steel 5. Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited 6. CHW Forge 7. CHW Forge Pvt. Ltd. 8. Citizen Metal Depot 9. Corum Flange 10. DN Forge Industries 11. Echjay Forgings Limited 12. Falcon Valves and Flanges Private Limited 13. Heubach International. 14. Hindon Forge Pvt. Ltd. 15. Kinnari Steel Corporation 16. M F Rings and Bearing Races Ltd 17. Mascot Metal Manufacturers 18. OM Exports 19. Punjab Steel Works 20. Raaj Sagar Steels 21. Ravi Ratan Metal Industries 22. Rolex Fittings India Pvt. Ltd 23. SHM (ShinHeung Machinery) 24. Siddhagiri Metal & Tubes 25. Sizer India 26. Steel Shape India 27. Sudhir Forgings Pvt. Ltd. 28. Umashanker Khandelwal Forging Limited


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         
                        *See Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India and Italy: Antidumping Duty Orders,*82 FR 40136 (August 24, 2017) (
                        *Order*). Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         
                        *See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review and Join Annual Inquiry Service List,*88 FR 50840 (August 2, 2023). Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         
                        *See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,*88 FR 71829 (October 18, 2023). Back to Citation
 4.
    
                         In prior segments of this proceeding, we determined that Norma (India) Limited, USK Exports Private Limited, Uma Shanker Khandelwal & Co., and Bansidhar Chiranjilal were affiliated and should be treated as a single entity (Norma Group). 
                        *See, e.g., Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination,*82 FR 9719 (February 8, 2017), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 4-5, unchanged in 
                        *Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value,*82 FR 29483 (June 29, 2017). In this review, Norma (India) Limited and its affiliated entities have affirmed that the factual basis on which Commerce made its prior determinations has not changed. 
                        *See*
                         Norma Group's Letter, “2nd Supplemental Response Section A, C and D of Anti-Dumping duty Original Questionnaire,” dated June 26, 2024, at S2-3. Therefore, Commerce continues to treat these four companies as a single entity. Back to Citation
 5.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Respondent Selection,” dated December 11, 2023 (Respondent Selection Memorandum). The Respondent Selection Memorandum incorrectly identified the number of companies on which we initiated as 41; we initiated the review on 42 companies after collapsing the four Norma Group companies as described above. Back to Citation
 6.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,” dated April 10, 2024. Back to Citation
 7.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings,” dated July 22, 2024. Back to Citation
 8.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India; 2022-2023,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). Back to Citation
 9.
    
                         
                        *See, e.g., Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Greece: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023,*89 FR 4274 (January 23, 2024). Back to Citation
 10.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.212(b)(2). Back to Citation
 11.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.212(d)(3). Back to Citation
 12.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Appendix III (listing the 27 companies). Back to Citation
 13.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Intent to Rescind Administrative Review, in Part,” dated December 15, 2023. Back to Citation
 14.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Appendix III. Back to Citation
 15.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Calculation of Margin for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination,” dated concurrently with this notice. Back to Citation
 16.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Appendix II for a list of companies not selected for individual examination. Back to Citation
 17.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.224(b). Back to Citation
 18.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). Back to Citation
 19.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2). Back to Citation
 20.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). Back to Citation
 21.
    
                         We use the term “issue” here to describe an argument that Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Back to Citation
 22.
    
                         
                        *See Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings; Final Rule,*88 FR 67069 (September 29, 2023). Back to Citation
 23.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.310(c). Back to Citation
 24.
    
                         
                        *See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification,*77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012). Back to Citation
 25.
    
                         
                        *Id.,*
                         77 FR at 8102-03; 
                        *see also*19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). Back to Citation
 26.
    
                         
                        *See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,*68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). Back to Citation
 27.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. Back to Citation
 28.
    
                         
                        *See Order,*
                         82 FR at 40138. Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2024-20751 Filed 9-12-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P