alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2606 

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants 

for training health professionals to treat opioid addiction and other 

substance use disorders through using technology-enabled models, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2018 

Mr. SCHATZ (for himself, Mrs. CAPITO, and Mr. UDALL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

to award grants for training health professionals to treat 

opioid addiction and other substance use disorders 

through using technology-enabled models, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Opioid ECHO Act’’. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2606 IS

1 SEC. 2. GRANTS TO TRAIN HEALTH PROFESSIONALS TO 

2 TREAT OPIOID ADDICTION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and 

4 Human Services, in coordination with the Administrator 

5 of the Health Resources and Services Administration and 

6 the Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance 

7 Use, shall award grants on a competitive basis to eligible 

8 entities for the purpose of training health professionals to 

9 treat opioid addiction and other substance use disorders, 

10 including by providing medication-assisted treatment, 

11 through the use of technology-enabled models. 

12 (b) DURATION.—Each grant awarded under this sec13 tion shall be for a period of 3 years. 

14 (c) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section: 

15 (1) ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—The term ‘‘eligible enti16 ty’’ means a nonprofit organization, an academic in17 stitution, a State, a Federally qualified health center 

18 as defined in section 1861(aa) of the Social Security 

19 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(aa)), or other entity deter20 mined appropriate by the Secretary of Health and 

21 Human Services. 

22 (2) TECHNOLOGY-ENABLED MODEL.—The term 

23 ‘‘technology-enabled model’’ means a technology-en24 abled collaborative learning and capacity building 

25 model, as defined in section 2 of the Expanding CaVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:47 Mar 28, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2606.IS S2606

dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2606 IS

1 pacity for Health Outcomes Act (Public Law 114– 

2 270; 130 Stat. 1395). 

3 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

4 authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section, 

5 $10,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2018 through 

6 2020. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
February 19, 2016

US Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Dear Sir or Madam,

Montico, Inc. currently holds Exemption #11230, Docket No. FAA-2014-0604 and the 

corresponding COA.

Montico, Inc. hereby requests an amendment to the Exemption #11230 and corresponding COA 

to Include additional small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS).

The requested system is as follows:

1. Yuneec – Tornado H920

The requested sUAS have been previously approved through the 333 exemption process for 

other organizations and manuals are on file. (Measure UAS, Inc. Exemption no. 12646A)

Montico, Inc. states that no conditions or limitations from our original request have changed 

and all operations of the additional sUAS will be in full compliance with the terms of the 

Exemption.

As this is an amendment to our existing exemption, Montico, Inc. respectfully submits that 

good cause exists so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the 

requested amendment.

Sincerely,

Ronald Wingo

Ronald Wingo

rwingo@montico.net

2710 N Argyle, Fresno, CA 93727
EXHIBIT 32.1

P&F INDUSTRIES, INC.  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of P&F Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Horowitz, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date March 30, 2009

/s/ RICHARD A. HOROWITZ Richard A. Horowitz Principal Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### YOUNGER v. STATE.

No. 20021.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 4, 1939.

David E. O’Fiel, of Beaumont, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

This is a conviction for burglary with an assessed penalty of two years, and is a companion case to cause No. 20020, 124 S.W.2d 383, in which there was a conviction for the felony theft of the goods alleged to have been stolen in this burglary, with a penalty of three years.

There is but one question presented herein, and it arose upon the following facts: While the jury was out deliberating upon their verdict in cause No. 20020 the appellant was put on trial in this cause. There was a plea of suspended sentence filed herein. While this instant cause was being tried, the jury in the theft case came in with a verdict, but the careful trial court received such verdict out of the presence and hearing of the jury in this cause. Afterward while appellant’s only witness, his mother, was on the witness stand, she testified that appellant had never been convicted of a felony in this or any other state; she was closely cross-examined relative to such statement, and consistently adhered thereto. She was thereupon asked by the State’s attorney whether or not the appellant had not been convicted by a jury on that very day and given a sentence of three years in the penitentiary. This was denied by appellant’s mother, at which time the State’s attorney caused the district clerk to read the verdict of the jury in the felony theft case to this trial jury. Proper objection was made thereto by appellant’s attorneys, which objection was overruled, but the trial court did instruct the jury not to consider such action and such other verdict.

We think the mere introduction of the verdict of the jury in cause No. 20020, although the court instructed the jury not to consider the same, was such an error as would justify this court in reversing this cause. The mere fact that another jury had returned a verdict finding this appellant guilty of a felony theft while this instant cause was being tried, was such a procedure as could have and doubtless did influence this jury in its deliberations, and to such an extent that its effect could not have been obliterated by such instruction.

On account of such error this judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2576 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to conduct a proceeding 

to determine whether certain activities by licensees of the Commission 

are undertakings under division A of subtitle III of title 54, United 

States Code, or major Federal actions under the National Environmental 

Policy Act of 1969. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 20, 2018 

Mr. MORAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to conduct a proceeding to determine whether certain activities 

by licensees of the Commission are undertakings under 

division A of subtitle III of title 54, United States Code, 

or major Federal actions under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reducing Antiquated 

5 Permitting for Infrastructure Deployments Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘RAPID Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2576 IS

1 SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

2 COMMISSION REGARDING UNDERTAKINGS 

3 AND MAJOR FEDERAL ACTIONS. 

4 (a) FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION DE5 TERMINATION.— 

6 (1) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

7 (A) the term ‘‘Commission’’ means the 

8 Federal Communications Commission; and 

9 (B) the term ‘‘radio station license’’ has 

10 the meaning given the term in section 3 of the 

11 Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 153). 

12 (b) PROCEEDING REQUIRED.—Notwithstanding sec13 tion 300320 of title 54, United States Code, or section 

14 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

15 U.S.C. 4332), not later than 180 days after the date of 

16 enactment of this Act, the Commission shall complete a 

17 proceeding to determine— 

18 (1) the classes of activities of the entities to 

19 which the Commission issues radio station licenses 

20 that do not constitute an undertaking under such 

21 section 300320; and 

22 (2) the classes of activities of the entities to 

23 which the Commission issues radio station licenses 

24 that do not constitute a major Federal action under 

25 paragraph (2)(C) of such section 102. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 24.09**

**AMBAC FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.**

**Power of Attorney**

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned director and officer of Ambac Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby constitutes andappoints each of **Sean T. Leonard**and**Anne Gill Kelly,** as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the **Annual Reporton Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008**, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange, and any and all amendments thereto, and any and all instruments and documents filed as a part of orin connection with the said **Form 10-K** or amendments thereto, and does hereby grant unto each said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in andabout the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each said attorney-in-fact and agent shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has subscribed these presents as of this 25th day of February 2009. 

/s/    David W. Wallis                

David W. Wallis
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Javier O.Lamoso, President of ClearComm, L.P., certify that:

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report of ClearComm, L.P.;

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: August 14, 2006 |   |                 |
|-----------------------|--------|----------------------|
|                  |   |                 |
|                  |   | /s/ Javier O. Lamoso |
|                  |   | Javier O. Lamoso     |
|                  |   | President            |

 

----
Memorandum 

To United States Department of Energy 

From Benjamin Longstreth, Natural Resources Defense Council 

Date March 4, 2014 

Re Ex Parte Communication 

On Monday March 3, 2014, a group of energy efficiency advocates had a conference 

call with representatives of the Department of Energy to discuss the standards for 

walk-in coolers. 

 The efficiency advocates presented information concerning 1) the certification of 

walk-in coolers that are sold as matched pairs and those that are sold separately 

and 2) the scope of products to which the standards will apply. 

The following individuals were present or on the telephone: 

John Cymbalsky, DOE 

 Dan Cohen, DOE 

 Ashley Armstrong, DOE 

 Michael Kido, DOE 

Benjamin Longstreth, NRDC 

Joanna Mauer, ASAP 

Andrew deLaski, ASAP 

Tim Ballo, Earthjustice 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 s/ Benjamin Longstreth 

 Natural Resources Defense Council
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMEDICS
DETECTION INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 3,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                                 36,006
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          17,442
<ALLOWANCES>                                            1,332
<INVENTORY>                                            16,349
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       73,935
<PP&E>                                                 12,472
<DEPRECIATION>                                          7,648
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        133,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  14,288
<BONDS>                                                   127
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                1,932
<OTHER-SE>                                            117,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          133,458
<SALES>                                                16,474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       20,412
<CGS>                                                   6,112
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           8,595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        2,446
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          193
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         3,004
<INCOME-TAX>                                            1,172
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     1,832
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                            1,832
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.09
        

</TABLE>
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March 8, 2012 |   /s/ John M. Lowber         |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                      | John M. Lowber                    |
|                      | Secretary, Treasurer and Director |
|                      | GCI, Inc.                         |

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICT Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Vincent A. Paccapaniccia, Executive Vice President, Corporate Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |                                                                        
|----------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|May 9, 2008 |  | /s/ Vincent A. Paccapaniccia                                           
|            |  | Vincent A. Paccapaniccia                                               
|            |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate Finance and Chief Financial Officer
# Diario Oficial C 273/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 273 |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 58° año18 de agosto de 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 273

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

58° año18 de agosto de 2015

---

| Número de información | Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrección de errores |
| 2015/C 273/01 | Corrección de errores de la Posición (UE) no 10/2015 del Consejo en primera lectura con vistas a la adopción de un Reglamento del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo por el que se modifica el Reglamento (CE) no 515/97 del Consejo relativo a la asistencia mutua entre las autoridades administrativas de los Estados miembros y a la colaboración entre estas y la Comisión con objeto de asegurar la correcta aplicación de las reglamentaciones aduanera y agraria — Adoptada por el Consejo el 15 de junio de 2015( DO C 239 de 21.7.2015 ) | 1 |

Número de información

Sumario

Página

Corrección de errores

2015/C 273/01

Corrección de errores de la Posición (UE) no 10/2015 del Consejo en primera lectura con vistas a la adopción de un Reglamento del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo por el que se modifica el Reglamento (CE) no 515/97 del Consejo relativo a la asistencia mutua entre las autoridades administrativas de los Estados miembros y a la colaboración entre estas y la Comisión con objeto de asegurar la correcta aplicación de las reglamentaciones aduanera y agraria — Adoptada por el Consejo el 15 de junio de 2015( DO C 239 de 21.7.2015 )

o

o

( DO C 239 de 21.7.2015 )

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

Corrección de errores

| 18.8.2015 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | C 273/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2015

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

C 273/1

---

Corrección de errores de la Posición (UE) no 10/2015 del Consejo en primera lectura con vistas a la adopción de un Reglamento del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo por el que se modifica el Reglamento (CE) no 515/97 del Consejo relativo a la asistencia mutua entre las autoridades administrativas de los Estados miembros y a la colaboración entre estas y la Comisión con objeto de asegurar la correcta aplicación de las reglamentaciones aduanera y agraria — Adoptada por el Consejo el 15 de junio de 2015

(
  Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea C 239 de 21 de julio de 2015
  )

(2015/C 273/01)

En la página 10, en el artículo 1, en el punto 15:

Se añade el punto siguiente:

| «c) | se suprime el apartado 3.». |
| --- | --- |

«c)

se suprime el apartado 3.».

---
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ADAM CONTI, Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTEC TION BOARD, Respondent.

______________________

2013

- 3071

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection

Board in No. NY0752090041 -I- 1.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

D AVID R ESTAINO

, Fox Rothschild, LLP, of Lawrenc eville, New Jersey, argued for petitioner. With him on the
brief was J OEL M. F ERDINAND

.

L INDSEY S CHRECKENGOST , Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respon dent. With h er on the
brief was B RYAN G. P OLISUK , General Counsel.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it isO RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN

, B RYSON

, and M OORE

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

February 24, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court