alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION***
     In connection with the Annual Report of Retail Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Heywood Wilansky, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                   /s/ Heywood Wilansky   Heywood Wilansky, President and Chief Executive Officer  April 18, 2005
* This Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act orotherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,except as otherwise stated in such filing.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2


             AMENDED SCHEDULE OF MORTGAGES AND SECURITY AGREEMENTS,
           SECURED PROMISSORY NOTES, AND GUARANTIES ("LOAN DOCUMENTS")
       WHICH ARE SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM OF KEY CORPORATE CAPITAL, INC.
      LOAN DOCUMENTS ATTACHED AS EXHIBITS 10.116, 10.117 AND 10.118 TO THE
              REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 12/31/99

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                                          DATE OF
       MORTGAGOR                                  FACILITY NAME                      LOCATION           MORTGAGE AMOUNT   MORTGAGE
       ---------                                  -------------                      --------           ---------------   --------

<S>                                    <C>                                   <C>                        <C>              <C>

Ithaca Bundy Road, LLC                  Alterra Clare Bridge Cottage of       101 Bundy Road               $3,325,800     3/17/99
                                        Ithaca                                Ithaca, NY  14850-9252

Ithaca Trumansburg Road, LLC            Alterra Sterling House of Ithaca      103 Bundy Road               $2,862,608     3/17/99
                                                                              Ithaca, NY  14850-9252

Niagara Nash Road, LLC                  Alterra Sterling House of Niagara     6751 Nash Road               $3,420,000    10/20/99
                                                                              North Tonawanda, NY 14120

Niagara SC Wheatfield, LLC              Alterra Clare Bridge Cottage of       6741 Nash Road               $3,367,010    10/20/99
                                        Niagara                               North Tonawanda, NY 14120

Clinton Brookside Drive, LLC            Alterra Clare Bridge Cottage of       115 Brookside Drive          $3,300,000     1/14/00
                                        Clinton                               Clinton, NY  13323

Glastonbury Fairway Crossing, LLC       Alterra Clare Bridge of Glastonbury   1824 Manchester Road         $5,447,129     4/21/00
                                                                              Glastonbury, CT

Rockland Veterans Memorial Drive, LLC   Clare Bridge of Rockland County       582 Veterans Memorial Dr     $6,335,739     6/15/00
                                                                              Orangetown, NY
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Frederick D. Sancilio, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for thequarter ended March 31, 2003 of aaiPharma Inc. (the “registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s fiscal quarter being reported (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date:June 24, 2004 /s/ Frederick D. Sancilio  Dr. Frederick D. Sancilio Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
```

CONFIRMING STATEMENT

    This statement confirms that the undersigned, Patrick A. Sherman, has authorized and designated, Jennifer Mainord, Deanna Brass or Rhonda Bost, to execute and file on the undersigned's behalf, all Form 3, 4, and 5 (including amendments thereto) that the undersigned may be required to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a result of the undersigned's ownership of or transactions in securities of First Merchants Corporation.  The authority of Jennifer Mainord, Deanna Brass or Rhonda Bost under this statement shall continue until the undersigned is no longer required to file Form 3, 4, and 5 with regard to the undersigned ownership or transactions in securities of First Merchants Corporation, unless earlier revoked in writing.  The undersigned acknowledges Jennifer Mainord, Deanna Brass or Rhonda Bost are not assuming any of the undersigned's responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                        __/s/ Patrick A. Sherman______
                        Patrick A. Sherman

Date: December 8, 2014
```
#### WOLF v. WOLF et al.

No. 8923.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

April 8, 1932.

Rehearing Denied May 11, 1932.

*519Hull & Oliver, of San Antonio, for appellant.

James Young, Jr., Howell J. Mueller, and Herman Glosserman, all of San Antonio, for appellees.

PLY, O. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court appointing a receiver for the property of appellant. A suit was instituted by appellant to obtain an injunction against ap-pellees to restrain them from interfering with him in the management of his estate. The answer pleaded that the appellant is a person of unsound mind and was, squandering his estate and was an easy victim to swindlers of various kinds, and prayed that a receiver be appointed and that appellant be restrained from interfering with the receiver. The answer was filed on March 22, 1932, and such receiver was appointed on the same date without any notice to appellant, and he was enjoined from handling his own property. The order appointing the receiver shows affirmatively that no testimony was offered, but the order was based on statements of the attorneys for appellees.

Appellees are children and a grandchild, who own no interest in appellant’s estate. They charge him with insanity, but affirmatively show that an effort to declare him insane had failed up to that time. Appellant is presumed to he sane and entitled to the management and control of his property. Without interest in the property and without testimony to support appellees’ grave and humiliating charges against appellant, in haste and without notice, appellant has been deprived of his property. The injustice and harshness of the proceeding is apparent. If appellant is insane, that fact can be established in a legal manner and a guardian appointed to protect his property interests, without resorting to the expensive plan involved in a receivership.

Receiverships without notice have been often condemned by the courts, and only a few weeks ago this court strongly condemned the practice. Pray-Chamberlain v. Barnhill (Tex. Civ. App.) *46*S.W.(2d) 462.

The order appointing a receiver is reversed, rhe receivership dissolved, and the proceedings set aside.
### Request for Information University of Nebraska Kearney (FAA-2015-3697) 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA)

Dear Ms. Gallaway: This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your peti tion (Docket No. FAA-2015-3697). This information is necessary for the Federal Av iation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

x Your petition references the material listed below, however the material was not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the fo llowing referenced materials:

{ Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) Please submit the additional informat ion (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information has been submitted, plea se also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comm ent tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. I f you want us to process your request any further, we mu st receive the information described above by December 31, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we wi ll close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions, please feelfree to contact me at (202) 267-2999. FAA Office of Rulemaking Sent : T hursday , December 17, 2015 3:58 PM To: gallawaysk@unk.edu
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

May 3, 2023

No. 04

- 23

- 00060

- CR

IN RE Jose GARCIA

- VAQUERA

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

On January 17, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed an emergency motion to stay the underlying proceedings pending disposition of the petition for writ of mandamus, which this court granted in part on January 17, 2023. Af ter considering the petition, real party in interest’s response, and the mandamus record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). The stay imp osed on January 17, 2023 is LIFTED

.

It is so ORDERED on May 3, 2023

.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of May, 2023

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 13362CR , st yled State of Texas v. Jose Garcia

- Vaquera , pending in the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Todd Alexander Blomerth presiding.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICT Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Vincent A. Paccapaniccia,
Executive Vice President, Corporate Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





August 14, 2002                         /s/ Vincent A. Paccapaniccia
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Vincent A. Paccapaniccia
                                        Executive Vice President, Corporate
                                        Finance and Chief Financial Officer







                                       20
**Exhibit 14**

**Code of Ethical Conduct for Financial Managers**

**In my role as a finance manager of the ________________________ Corporation,**

**I recognize that financial managers hold an important and elevated role in corporate governance.  I am uniquely capable and empowered to ensure that stakeholders’ interests are appropriately balanced, protectedand preserved. Accordingly, this Code provides principles to which financial managers are expected to adhere and advocate. The Code embodies rules regarding individual and peer responsibilities, as well as responsibilities to the company, the public and otherstakeholders.**

**I certify to you that I adhere to and advocate the following principles and responsibilities governing my professional and ethical conduct.**

**To the best of my knowledge and ability:**

**1.         I act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of interest in personal and professional relationships.**

**2.         I provide constituents with information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely and understandable.**

**3.         I comply with rules and regulations of federal, state, provincial and local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies.**

**4.         I act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing my independent judgment to besubordinated.**

**5.         I respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of my work except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to disclose. Confidential informationacquired in the course of my work is not used for personal advantage.**

**6.         I share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to my constituents’ needs.**

**7.         I proactively promote ethical behavior as a responsible partner among peers in my work environment and community.**

**8.         I achieve responsible use of and control over all assets and resources employed or entrusted to me.**

____________________________________________**(Signature)***As recommended by Financial Executives International. Copied to the company’s CFO and/or Audit Committee as a best practice.
OPTICAL COATING LABORATORY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                  EXHIBIT 21.  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                                        
Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in 1948. The
Company was reincorporated in California in 1963 and again reincorporated
in Delaware November 2, 1987.

Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc. has the following subsidiaries:

                                             PERCENT OF      PLACE OF
SUBSIDIARY NAME                              OWNERSHIP     INCORPORATION

OCLI International Service Corporation        100%           California

OCLI Foreign Sales Corporation                100%                 Guam

OCLI Optical Coatings Limited                 100%             Scotland

OCLI Optical Coating Laboratory GmbH          100%              Germany

MMG Glastechnik GmbH                          100%              Germany

OCLI Monitor Produkte GmbH                    100%              Germany

OCLI Optical Coatings Espana S.A.             100%                Spain

Optical Coating Laboratory B.V.               100%          Netherlands

Optical Coating Laboratory EURL               100%               France

Optical Coating Laboratory Srl                100%                Italy

OCLI Monitor Products Srl                     100%                Italy

Flex Products, Inc.                            60%             Delaware
February 19, 2016

US Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Sir or Madam, Montico, Inc. currently holds Exemption #11230, Docket No. FAA

- 2014

-0604 and the corresponding COA. Montico, Inc. hereby requests an amendment to the Exemption #11230 and corresponding COA to Include additional small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS). The requested system is as follows: 1. Yuneec
– Tornado H920 The requested sUAS have been previously approved throug h the 333 exemption process for other organizations and manuals are on file. ( Measure UAS, Inc. Exemption no. 12646A) Montico, Inc. states that no conditions or limitations from our original request have changed and all operations of the additional sUAS w ill be in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption. As this is an amendment to our existing exemption, Montico, Inc. respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment. Sincerely, 

## Ronald Wingo Ronald Wingo rwingo@montico.net 2710 N Argyle, Fresno, CA 93727
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FIRSTCITY LIQUIDATING TRUST JUNE 30, 1999 FORM 10-Q FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FIRSTCITY LIQUIDATING TRUST JUNE
30, 1999 FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,574
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     33,616
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,190
<SALES>                                          3,773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,956
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,499
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,457
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,457
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,457
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: August 7, 2014 518139 

________________________________

In the Matter of the Claim of 

WORRELL BAILEY,

Respondent,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BEN CICCONE, INC., et al.,

Appellants.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: May 28, 2014

Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Garry, Rose and Devine, JJ.

__________

Hamberger & Weiss, Rochester (Ronald E. Weiss of counsel),

for appellants.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City

(Steven Segall of counsel), for Workers' Compensation Board,

respondent.

__________

Rose, J.

Appeals from a decision and an amended decision of the

Workers' Compensation Board, filed October 25, 2012 and March 21,

2013, which, among other things, directed the employer's workers'

compensation carrier to make a deposit into the aggregate trust

fund pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 27 (2).

In a prior decision, this Court affirmed an award of

benefits to claimant, who developed consequential neuromuscular

disease and an anxiety disorder after contracting Lyme disease
-2- 518139 

during the course of his employment (104 AD3d 1017, 1017-1018

[2013]). The Workers' Compensation Board has since classified

claimant as permanently totally disabled as a result of his workrelated injury and directed the employer's workers' compensation

carrier to deposit the present value of unpaid benefits,

$341,123.64, into the aggregate trust fund. The employer and

carrier (hereinafter collectively referred to as the employer)

appeal.

We affirm. The employer argues that the Board erred by

imposing a mandatory, rather than discretionary, deposit into the

aggregate trust fund because claimant was not classified with a

statutory permanent total disability under Workers' Compensation

Law § 15 (1). The employer concedes, however, that it did not

raise this issue either before the Workers' Compensation Law

Judge or in its initial application for review by the Board

panel, and the Board did not address it. While the employer did

raise the issue in an application for rehearing and/or full Board

review, a party's arguments addressed to full Board review are

not preserved by its appeal from a Board panel decision (see

Matter of Rogers v Community Health Ctr., 299 AD2d 604, 605

[2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 508 [2003]). Nor does the appeal from

the amended decision bring the issue up for review. Rather, our

review of that decision is limited to determining whether the

denial of full Board review was arbitrary and capricious (see

Matter of Barone v Interstate Maintenance Corp., 73 AD3d 1302,

1303 [2010]; Matter of D'Errico v New York City Dept. of

Corrections, 65 AD3d 795, 795-796 [2009], appeal dismissed 13

NY3d 899 [2009]), an issue that has not been addressed in the

employer's briefs. 

Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Garry and Devine, JJ., concur.
-3- 518139 

ORDERED that the decision and amended decision are

affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court