alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2389 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the impaneling of a 

new jury if a jury fails to recommend by unanimous vote a sentence 

for conviction of a crime punishable by death. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2018 

Mr. TOOMEY (for himself, Mr. COTTON, Mr. CORNYN, and Mr. CRUZ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the 

impaneling of a new jury if a jury fails to recommend 

by unanimous vote a sentence for conviction of a crime 

punishable by death. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Eric’s Law’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2389 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO IMPANEL A NEW JURY IN CER2 TAIN CASES. 

3 (a) ADDITIONAL GROUND FOR IMPANELING JURY.— 

4 Section 3593(b)(2) of title 18, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

7 the end; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(E) a new special hearing is required pur10 suant to subsection (g); or’’. 

11 (b) IMPANELING OF NEW JURY WHEN JURY DOES

12 NOT REACH A UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION.—Section 

13 3593 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by add14 ing at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(g) SPECIAL RULE WHEN JURY DOES NOT RE16 TURN A UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION.— 

17 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If a jury described in sub18 section (b)(1) or subparagraphs (A) through (D) of 

19 subsection (b)(2) does not, by unanimous vote, make 

20 a recommendation whether the defendant should be 

21 sentenced to death, to life imprisonment without 

22 possibility of release, or some other lesser sentence 

23 pursuant to subsection (e), the court, upon motion 

24 of the attorney for the government, shall order a 

25 new special hearing and impanel a new jury pursu26 ant to subsection (b). 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2389 IS

1 ‘‘(2) IMPOSITION OF SENTENCE.—If the jury 

2 impaneled pursuant to paragraph (1) does not reach 

3 a unanimous recommendation as to sentence, the 

4 court shall impose a sentence other than death au5 thorized by law.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.2** **INDEPENDENT    REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT**      We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated    April 13, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial    statements of CytoCore Inc. (formerly Molecular Diagnostics,    Inc.) included in the Annual Report on    Form 10-KSB/A    for the year ended December 31, 2006, in the following    registration statements:      (1)     Registration Statement    Number 333-97863    on    Form S-8      (2)     Registration Statement    Number 333-61666    on    Form S-4    (as amended) /s/  Altschuler,    Melvoin and Glasser LLP     Chicago, Illinois    April 27, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Moore Medical Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2001 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Linda M. Autore, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company and member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to Section 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


  /s/  Linda M. Autore
Linda M. Autore
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 28, 2003
EXHIBIT 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Acceptance Insurance Companies Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement No.33-53730 and No.33-68856 on Form S-3 and in
Registration Statement No.33-07397, No.33-67180 and No.33-51441
on Form S-8 of Acceptance Insurance Companies Inc. of our reports
dated March 13, 1998 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Acceptance Insurance Companies Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1997.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
March 27, 1998
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Lily ICOS LLC:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-48401, 33-80680, 33-64762, 333-08485 and 333-78315) on Form S-8 of ICOS
Corporation of our report dated January 26, 2001 relating to the balance sheets
of Lilly ICOS LLC (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2000 and
1999, and the related statements of operations, comprehensive operations,
members' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
period ended December 31, 2000, the period from October 2, 1998 (inception) to
December 31, 1998 and the period from October 2, 1998 (inception) to December
31, 2000, which report appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form
10-K of ICOS Corporation.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington
March 29, 2001
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

HOWARD MARK HYMAN,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2633 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

File No. C2

- 19

- 37

Attorney Registration No. 30104

( Out of State )

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18 th day of July, 2019, upon consideration of the Certificate of

Admission of Disability by Howard Mark Hyman, he is immediately transferred to inactive

status for an indefinite period and until further Order of the Court. See Pa.R.D.E. 301( e).

He shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

All pending disciplinary proceedings shall be held in abeyance, except for the

perpetuation of testimony and the preservation of documentary evidence.
NO. SCEC-12-0000725
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

KALEIHIKINA "KALEI" AKAKA,

Plaintiff,

vs. FRED HOUSEL; NICOLE LOWEN; BUCKY LESLIE; SCOTT NAGO, Chief Election Officer; STATE OF HAWAI # I OFFICE OF ELECTIONS; JAMAE KAWAUCHI, County of Hawai # i Clerk;

OFFICE OF THE CLERK, HAWAI # I COUNTY; and NEIL ABERCROMBIE, Governor of the State of Hawai # i, Defendants.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By : R eck ten wal d, C.J ., Nak aya ma, Ac oba , M cKe nnaan d P oll ack , J J.)

Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration of the August 31, 2012 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment, which was filed by Plaintiff Kaleihikina “Kalei” Akaka on September 10, 2012, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it does not appear that this court has overlooked or misapprehended points of law or fact. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCEC-12-0000725 20-SEP-2012 10:48 AMreconsideration is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, September 20, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT
AND NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             548
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,213
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,705
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,974
<PP&E>                                          92,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,782
<BONDS>                                         12,236
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           215
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,768
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,914
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,420
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   330
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,938
<INCOME-TAX>                                       736
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,202
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,202
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

WILLIAM O. BARKSDALE,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§

§ No. 202, 2020

§

§

§ Court Below–Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 1403019776 (N)

§ 

§

§ 

Submitted: February 15, 2021

 Decided: April 14, 2021

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.

O R D E R

After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion 

to affirm, and the Superior Court record, we find it evident that the judgment below 

should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court 

in its well-reasoned decision dated April 30, 2020.1 The appellant, William 

Barksdale, argues for the first time on appeal that his co-defendant’s admission that 

he stored drugs where the drugs that led to Barksdale’s criminal charges were found 

is new evidence of Barksdale’s actual innocence. But the co-defendant’s confession

is neither new evidence nor evidence that Barksdale is actually innocent of the 

1

State v. Barksdale, 2020 WL 2096148 (Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 30, 2020).
2

charges to which, as the Superior Court found and this Court affirmed, he knowingly, 

intelligently, and voluntarily pleaded guilty.2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the State’s motion to affirm is 

GRANTED, and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura__________________

Justice

2

State v. Barksdale, 2015 WL 5676895, at *5 (Del. Super. Ct. Sept. 21, 2015) (denying 

Barksdale’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea and, relevant here, finding that (i) Barksdale had 

knowingly and voluntarily pleaded guilty and (ii) Barksdale did not have a basis to assert that he 

was legally innocent), aff’d, 2016 WL 2585892 (Del. Apr. 6, 2016).
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 11, 2018

No. 04-18-00310-CR

Shaun Ruiz PUENTE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-01-0040-CRA

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On June 12, 2018, this court notified the court reporters responsible for preparing the 

record, Ms. Patricia Gaddis and Mr. Richey Gentry, that the reporter’s record was late. Ms. 

Gaddis and Mr. Gentry were directed to file a notification of late record if they had not received

payment or to file the reporter’s record no later than July 12, 2018. On June 28, 2018, Mr. 

Richey Gentry filed a notification of late record stating that he is responsible for preparing the 

record of the trial on the merits and Ms. Gaddis is responsible for preparing the record of voir 

dire. Due to the size of the record, Mr. Gentry requested an extension for his portion of the 

record until October 2018. We ordered that Mr. Gentry file his portion of the reporter’s record in 

this court no later than October 10, 2018, or 90 days from July 12, 2018. On July 9, 2018, Ms. 

Gaddis filed a notification of late record requesting an extension to file her portion of the record 

until October 15, 2018. 

It is therefore ORDERED that Ms. Gaddis file her portion of the reporter’s record in this 

court no later than October 10, 2018. If the record is not received by such date, an order may be 

issued directing Ms. Gaddis to appear before this court in person and show cause why she should 

not be held in contempt for failing to file the record. The clerk of this court shall cause a copy of 

this order to be served on Ms. Gaddis by certified mail, return receipt requested, or give other 

personal notice of this order with proof of delivery. Because “[t]he trial and appellate courts are 

jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed,” TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c), 

the clerk of the court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Honorable Donna S. Rayes, 

Judge of the 218th Judicial District Court of Atascosa County, Texas.
_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of July, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

Cause number: 01

- 18

- 00 714

- CR

Style: Walter Nelson v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : February 19

, 201 9

Type of motion: Second Motion for E xtension of T ime to File Appellant’s Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant’s Appointed Counsel Richard K. Oliver

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: Dec ember 1 9 , 201 8

Number of extensions granted: 1 Current Due D ate: Feb r uary 19 , 201 9

Date Requested: April 18 , 201 9 (1 2 1 days from original due date)

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted , in part

If document is to be filed, document due: March 2 1 , 201 9

.  No further extensions of time will be granted

.  Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

Because appellant ’s c ounsel has filed a second extension request ing 6 0 days to file h is

brief due to trials scheduled in other cases for Febr uary and early March and because

he is a solo practitioner, his request is granted , in part , for 3 0 days due to the total

length requested. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4.1 (a)

, 10.5(b)(1)(C), 38.6(d). However

, counsel

is warned that no further extensions will be granted

.

Judge’ s signature:

___

/s/ Justice Evelyn V. Keyes

________

x Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: __ February 26, 2019

_____
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED   CONDENSED   CONSOLIDATED   FINANCIAL   STATEMENTS  INCLUDED  IN  THE
REGISTRANT'S  FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001012270
<NAME>                        CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         14,101
<SECURITIES>                                   10,646
<RECEIVABLES>                                  166
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               25,045
<PP&E>                                         138
<DEPRECIATION>                                 44
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 25,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,406
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       85
<OTHER-SE>                                     22,661
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   25,152
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               300
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,782
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,506)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,506)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,506)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.79)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2017

t0425 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2017

155559

In re A.S. CRAWFORD, Minor. SC: 155559

COA: 334166

Wayne CC Family Div:

16

- 522398

- NA

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited financial statements of Film Roman, Inc., as of and for the three
month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2000, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       5,205,513               5,205,513
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  596,811                 596,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                 28,120,052              28,120,052
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       3,116,179               3,116,179
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,325,021               2,325,021
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,273,416              35,273,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        85,653                  85,653
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,370,364              36,370,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,273,416              35,273,416
<SALES>                                      5,039,889              25,671,673
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,039,889              25,671,673
<CGS>                                        4,651,857              25,196,846
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,651,857              25,196,846
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               833,876               3,012,806
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,353                 212,834
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (374,491)             (2,325,145)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                   1,588
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (374,491)             (2,326,733)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (374,491)             (2,326,733)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)                  (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>