alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2692 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

4558 Broadway in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Stanley Michels Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2018 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 

Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4558 Broadway in New York, New York, 

as the ‘‘Stanley Michels Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STANLEY MICHELS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 4558 Broadway in New York, 

6 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Stanley 

7 Michels Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2692 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Stanley Michels Post 

3 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1



                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


The subsidiaries listed below are as at March 27, 2001 directly or indirectly,
wholly-owned and all are consolidated in the financial statements.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              STATE OR COUNTRY IN WHICH
     SUBSIDIARY NAME                          INCORPORATED OR ORGANIZED
     ---------------                          -------------------------
     <S>                                      <C>
     Alumitech, Inc.                          Delaware

     Alumitech of Cleveland, Inc.             Delaware

     Alumitech of Wabash, Inc.                Indiana

     AWT Properties, Inc.                     Ohio

     ETS Schaefer Corporation                 Ohio

     The Feldspar Corporation                 North Carolina

     Suzorite Mica Products Inc.              Ontario, Canada

     Suzorite Mineral Products, Inc.          Delaware

     Zemex Industrial Minerals, Inc.          Delaware

     Zemex Mica Corporation                   Delaware

     Zemex U.S. Corporation                   Delaware
</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

JEAN W. PIERRE LOUIS , Appellant,

v.

NATHALIE L. PIERRE LOUIS , Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 2729

[ August 28, 2024 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Kristin R. Kanner , Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE 2021

- 0012296

.
Stephanie G. Morrow of S.G. Morrow & Associates, P.A., North Miami, for appellant.

No appearance filed for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

. See Ries v. Ries , 984 So. 2d 612

, 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (“ Because [the appellant] never moved to set aside the default, did not file a financial affidavit, and failed to respond to discovery, the trial court found that he had either waived or was estopped from presenting evidence regarding [the disputed issues ]

. We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s actions here .”) (internal quotation marks omitted) ; Topvalco Inc. v. Wolff , 358 So. 3d 747, 749 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023) (“ Where an error appears for the first time on the face of an order, a litigant must move for rehearing, to vacate, or for relief from judgment to bring the error to the attention of the lower tribunal .”) ; Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ( “ Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court ’ s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. ” )

.

G ERBER , C ONNER and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *2 Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
ALLAN QUATTRIN
                       --------------
              c/o 45630 Citrus Street, Suite E
                      Indio, California
                        U.S.A. 92201




October 26, 2004

VIA FAX     (604) 684-0916
--------------------------

P--CE Computers, Inc.
---------------------
c/o 2550 - 555 W. Hastings St.
Vancouver, B.C.
V6B 4N5

Attention:  The Board of Directors

Dear Sirs:

Re:       P--CE Computers, Inc. (the "Company")
          -------------------------------------
          Non-accrual of all outstanding salary owed to Allan Quattrin under the
          ----------------------------------------------------------------------
          Management Agreement up to August 31, 2004
          ------------------------------------------

Please be advised that I hereby agree and acknowledge that no compensation owing
from the Company to myself under the  Management  Agreement  between the Company
and myself,  dated August 1, 2002, will be accrued from August 1, 2002 to August
31, 2004.  However,  after August 31, 2004, any non-payment of salary owing from
the  Company to myself  under the above  mentioned  Management  Agreement  shall
accrue.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me.

Yours very truly,


/s/ Allan Quattrin

ALLAN QUATTRIN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FILM ROMAN, INC., AS OF AND FOR THE THREE
MONTH AND NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,403,895               3,403,895
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  677,538                 677,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                 27,819,482              27,819,482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,557,097               1,557,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                 725,941                 725,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,629,804              23,629,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                      1,230,000               1,230,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  7,474,400               7,474,400
<COMMON>                                           700                     700
<OTHER-SE>                                   (691,345)               (691,345)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,629,804              33,629,804
<SALES>                                     11,108,312              24,824,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,108,312              24,824,010
<CGS>                                       10,245,746              23,172,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,245,746              23,172,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,002,187               2,596,659
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,339                  94,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (108,282)               (850,453)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (108,282)               (850,453)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (108,282)               (850,453)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)                  (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Bria n K. Zahra

, Justices 

# Order

December 9, 2011

143233

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 143233

COA: 297154

Oakland CC: 2009

- 227741

- FH

PECOLA MICHELLE JAMISON,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 26, 2011

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Y OUNG , C.J. ( dissenting ).

I respectfully dissent from the Court’s order denying the application for leave to

appeal. I would peremptorily reverse the Court of Appeals decision on the sentencing

guideline issue. The Court of Appeals correctly interpreted and applied the phrase

“d omestic relationship” in MCL 777.40(1)(b). Since the defendant did not exploit a

“domestic relationship” under MCL 777.40(1)(b), the circuit court should not have

scored OV 10 at 10 points. However, it appears defendant engaged in “predatory

conduct” und er MCL 777.40(1)(a). By following the victim, directing him to pull over,

and then attacking the victim when he parked on a side street, the defendant engaged in

stalking behavior, which is precisely the type of “genuinely predatory conduct” that

justifie s scoring OV 10 at 15 points. 1

1 See People v Huston , 489 Mich 451, 462 n 7 (2011). Moreover, this predatory conduct was directed at a

victim who suffered from a readily apparent susceptibility to persuasion and temptation.

The victim testified that he had previously dated the defendant, that they had enjo yed

sexual encounters after the break up, and that he was hoping for another sexualI, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk December 9, 2011

y1206 2

r endezvous when the defendant directed him to pull over immediately before the offense.

Finally, the defendant’s preoffense conduct appears to have been for the purpose o f

victimization, as the defendant attacked the victim as soon as he complied with her

demands to pull over. Thus, under People v Huston and People v Cannon

, 2 there are

grounds to score OV 10 at 15 points when the defendant is resentenced. Since there is an alternative basis to sustain the defendant’s original sentence, I would peremptorily

reverse the Court of Appeals on this question and allow the original sentence to stand.

M ARILYN K ELLY

, J. ( dissenting ).

I dissent from the order denying leave to appeal. I would grant leave to appeal to

consider whether the Court of Appeals correctly interpreted the phrase “domestic

relationship” in MCL 777.40(1)(b).

2 People v Cannon , 481 Mich 152, 161

- 6 2 (2008).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from registrant's
unaudited financial statements as of and for the nine months ended March 31,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             632
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,953,185
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,622,976
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,517,953
<PP&E>                                       2,079,079
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,812,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,651,606
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        100
<COMMON>                                           900
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,812,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,812,340
<SALES>                                      5,273,802
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,273,802
<CGS>                                        4,098,460
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,328,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             118,631
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,031,764)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (124,441)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (907,323)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (907,323)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 29, 2013

d0422 

# Order

April 29, 2013

146561

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146561

COA: 307372

St. Joseph CC: 03

- 011781

- FC

JEFFERY TODD BARNES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 99.2





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



        In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of nStor Technologies,
Inc. (the  "Company")  for the period ended  December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the "Form  10-K"),  I,
Thomas L. Gruber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information  contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Thomas L. Gruber
-----------------------
Thomas L. Gruber
Chief Financial Officer
March 21, 2003


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  This statement is
not deemed to be "filed" with the Securities and Exchange  Commission as part of
the report on Form 10-K.
#### ABADIE v. STATE.

No. 18702.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 6, 1937.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 10, 1937.

*239W. R. Blain, of Beaumont, for- appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault; the punishment, a fine of $100 and confinement in jail for 90 days.

According to the testimony of the State, appellant made an unprovoked attack on A. Brazile with a knife. It was appellant’s version that he acted in self-defense.

Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to show that the knife he used was a deadly weapon. We find no testimony in the record showing the size of the knife. However, the testimony of Brazile discloses that he was cut and stabbed several times. He said: “He cut me there and I can’t raise this arm yet. I am still disabled.” Again we quote from his testimony : “I was in the hospital fourteen days. I have not been back to work since that. I can’t work. How can I work when I can’t hardly walk? When I get up I am stiff. He cut me with a knife.” On cross-examination he testified: “I have lost some flesh since I was cut. I am weak yet. I was stronger at that time than I am now.” We quote further from his testimony : “I was on top but he was cutting me all the time. How could I get up? I was cut to death. After I got up I started home by myself. I walked all the way from the place where I was cut to the corner. When I got to the corner I got weak. Yes, sir, I walked all the way down to the corner from Herring Street down to the corner before anyone helped me. My boy helped me on to the house then.” The assault occurred on the 14th of May, 1936. The trial was held on the 30th day of June, 1936. Thus it appears that approximately a month and a half after he received the injuries Brazile was weak and unable to work. Again, according to the testimony, one of his arms was disabled. These circumstances, taken in connection with the fact that his injuries required him to remain in the hospital fourteen days, warranted the conclusion that the injuries were grave, not trivial, and were such as gave rise to apprehension of danger to life, health, or limb. See Chapman v. State, 126 Tex.Cr.R. 645, 73 S.W(2d) 536. In support of our conclusion, we cite Buie v. State, 128 Tex.Cr.R. 654, 83 S.W.(2d) 346.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The' foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

MORROW, P. J., absent.
EXHIBIT 23.3


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on
Form S-3 of First Merchants Corporation of our reports dated January 8, 1999 on
Jay Financial Corporation, and January 15, 1999 on Anderson Community Bank,
relating to the statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash
flows of those organizations for the year ended December 31, 1998, included in
First Merchants Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, and of our report, dated January 25, 2001, on the
consolidated financial statements of Lafayette Bancorporation as of December 31,
2000 and 1999 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000, included in First Merchants Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
December 21, 2001. We also consent to the reference to our firm appearing under
the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus.






CROWE, CHIZEK AND COMPANY LLP
December 21, 2001
Indianapolis, Indiana
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Christian S. Schade, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Medarex, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report of Medarex, Inc. on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Medarex, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 15, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    CHRISTIAN S. SCHADE
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                            | 
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                      |  | Christian S. Schade                              
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



Signed originals of
these written statements required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of these written statements required by Section 906, have
been provided to Medarex, Inc. and will be retained by Medarex, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This Certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 15(d) and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15
U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.
Registration Statement
    
    Description
    
    Shares RegisteredForm S-8 (333-01047)
    
    Individual Account Retirement Plan
    
    
    1,500,000Form S-8 (333-58161)
    
    1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan
    
    
    550,000Form S-8 (333-110536)
    
    Amended and Restated 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan
    
    
    1,100,000Form S-8 (333-137540)
    
    Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. Amended and Restated 1998 Long-Term
Incentive Plan
    
    
    1,000,000Form S-8
(333-161474)
    
    Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. Amended and Restated 1998 Long-Term
Incentive Plan

    
    
    450,000Form S-3
(333-161475)
    
    Registration of $100 million of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.s
shares of common stock and debt securities