alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification by Jeffrey Siegel, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Laurence Winoker, Senior Vice President  Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

I, Jeffrey Siegel, Chief Executive Officer and
President, and I, Laurence Winoker, Senior Vice President  Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, of Lifetime Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), each hereby certifies that:



| | (1) | The Companys Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      |  |  |  |                                                                      
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Jeffrey Siegel                    |  |  |  | /s/ Laurence Winoker                                                 
|Jeffrey Siegel                        |  |  |  | Laurence Winoker                                                     
|Chief Executive Officer and President |  |  |  | Senior Vice President- Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|                                      |  | 
|Date: April 30, 2013                  |  |  |  | Date: April 30, 2013                                                 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 has been provided to Lifetime Brands, Inc. and
will be retained by Lifetime Brands, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff, upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

August 14, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00182

- CR

Darnell ROGERS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR12728 Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

After we granted Appellant’s first motion for extension of time to file the brief,

A ppellant’s brief was due on August 7 , 2017

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). On the due date, Appellant filed a second motion for a thirty

- day extension of time to file the brief.

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED ; the brief is due on September 8 , 2017

. No further extension of time will be granted absent extenuating circumstances

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 14th day of August, 2017

.

___________________________________ Luz Estrada Chief Deputy Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1428604
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   911153
<ALLOWANCES>                                     42000
<INVENTORY>                                     665071
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3004828
<PP&E>                                         2559185
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1875065
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4185507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1120085
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         59004
<OTHER-SE>                                      722030
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4185507
<SALES>                                        2740476
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2740476
<CGS>                                          1595035
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1595035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2884802
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1739361
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               48819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1117654)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1117654)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1117654)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC.
         THE INTERPUBLIC NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS' STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
                                  ("the Plan")

                  FORM OF INSTRUMENT OF RESTRICTED SHARE UNITS

          THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND SHOULD BE KEPT IN A SAFE PLACE
          -------------------------------------------------------------

THIS IS TO CERTIFY that, on the date shown below, the under-mentioned
Non-Management Director ("the Grantee") has been granted an award of Restricted
Share Units, subject to the Rules of the above-mentioned Plan, for the number of
shares of Common Stock of The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. specified
below.



Grantee:  Name:

Date of Grant:

Number of Restricted
  Share Units granted:        [        ]

Lapse of Restrictions:        Except as set forth in Section 8.3 of the Plan,
                              the Restricted Share Units shall be subject to
                              forfeiture on the third anniversary of the date
                              of the Grant.



                                    THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC.



                                    By
                                       -------------------------------------


The foregoing Grant of a Restricted Share
Units Award is hereby accepted on the terms
contained herein:



---------------------------------
            Grantee
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7129

LATIF RASHE’D, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

JEFFREY DILLMAN, Warden Senior; K.L. PICKEREL, Assistant 

Warden; J.M. MILLNER, Department of Correctional Education, 

 Defendants – Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior 

District Judge. (7:08-cv-00333-jct-mfu) 

Submitted: February 17, 2009 Decided: March 10, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Latif Rashe’d, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Latif Rashe’d appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b)(1) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Rashe’d v. Dillman, No. 7:08-cv-00333-

jct-mfu (W.D. Va. June 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2692 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4558 Broadway in New York, New York, 

as the ‘‘Stanley Michels Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2692 ES

1 SECTION 1. STANLEY MICHELS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 4558 Broadway in New York, 

4 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Stanley 

5 Michels Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Stanley Michels Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the Senate June 28, 2018. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2692 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. York, New York, as the ‘‘Stanley Michels Post al Service located at 4558 Broadway in New
EXHIBIT 23.1






INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Acceptance Insurance Companies Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement No. 33-53730 and No. 33-68856 on Form S-3 and in
Registration Statement No. 33-07397, No. 33-67180 and No.
33-51441 on Form S-8 of Acceptance Insurance Companies Inc.
of our reports dated March 12, 1997 which expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
relating to the change in accounting method as described in
Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Acceptance Insurance
Companies Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
March 27, 1997
June 10, 2015 

Mr. Stephen Dollar 

Kevin B. Hays Fire Consulting, LLC 

1470 Kastner Place 

Sanford, FL 32771 

Dear Mr. Dollar: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 18, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1738), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
EXHIBIT
      10.2

     

    FIRST
      AMENDMENT TO B&D FOOD CORPORATION PREFERRED SHARE SUBSCRIPTION
      AGREEMENT

     

    THIS
      FIRST AMENDMENT TO SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made as of
      November 19, 2008, by and among B&D Food Corporation, a corporation
      organized under the laws of Delaware ("BDFC"), and Daniel Ollech, Jacques
      Ollech and Mark Radom, each an individual residing in Israel (the "Purchasers").
      

     

    Whereas,
      the
      parties hereto entered into a subscription agreement (the “Original Agreement”)
      relating to the Series A Preferred Shares (defined
      below) on
      September 28, 2008 in order to convert the outstanding principal and interest
      owing in respect of a $10,000,000 pursuant to a promissory note dated July
      8,
      2005, as amended by the amendment to the promissory note dated May 7, 2007
      and a
      second amendment to the promissory note dated September 28, 2008 (the “Note”),
      as well as certain management fees owed to Daniel and Jacques Ollech into equity
      in BDFC; 

     

    Whereas,
      the
      parties to the Original Agreement erroneously indicated the number of Series
      A
      Preferred Shares referenced therein as 373,595,592 and now wish to correct
      this
      mistake by indicating the correct number of shares;

     

    Now,
      therefore,
      in
      consideration of the mutual premises and covenants contained herein, and
      intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     

    1.
      Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement shall be hereby amended by replacing
      “373,595,592” with “3,735,956”. Section 1.2 of the Original Agreement shall be
      amended by adding at the end of this section the text “and Daniel Ollech and
      Jacques Ollech releasing their claim for certain management fees promised to
      them by BDFC (the Series A Preferred Shares corresponding to such management
      fees being 992,067 Series A Preferred Shares).” The second bullet point in
      Section 1.3 shall hereby be amended by replacing “one” with “ten”. These
      amendments shall be effective as of September 28, 2008.

     

    2.
      All
      other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement remain in full force and
      effect.

     

    3.
      Governing
      Law and Jurisdiction.
      This
      Agreement shall be governed by, and be construed in accordance with, the laws
      of
      the State of New York (without giving effect to the conflicts of laws
      provisions thereof). The parties agree that any disputes arising hereunder
      shall
      be submitted to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of
      New
      York.

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and
      year
      first above written.

     

    B&D
      Food Corporation 

     

      
        

      

       

    

    Daniel
      Ollech

    
       

      
        

      

    

    


    Jacques
      Ollech

     

    
      

    

     

    Mark
      Radom
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FIRSTCITY LIQUIDATING TRUST JUNE 30, 1998 FORM 10-Q FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FIRSTCITY LIQUIDATING TRUST JUNE
30, 1998 FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          22,380
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     49,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,099
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,999
<SALES>                                         27,478
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,895
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,768
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,127
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,127
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,127
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21-1616V

UNPUBLISHED

JULIA SEELI on behalf of her minor 

child, P.S.,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: April 25, 2022

Withdrawal of petition; Order 

concluding proceedings

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On July 26, 2021, Julia Seeli filed a petition for compensation on behalf of her

minor child, P.S., under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 

§ 300aa—10 through 34.

2 Petitioner alleged that P.S. suffered injuries after receiving a 

human papillomavirus vaccination on July 23, 2018. ECF no. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine 

Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “that the petitioner may withdraw the petition 

under section 300aa—21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section 

300aa—21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master.” 42 

U.S.C. § 300aa—12(g). On April 22, 2022, Petitioner timely filed a notice to withdraw 

the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—21(b). 

In light of Petitioner’s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa—21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner’s request to withdraw the

petition is GRANTED. Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that 

proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment 

“on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Office.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United 

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal 

Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available 

to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, 

I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.
2

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
[No. 24971-5-II.

Division Two.

December 1, 2000.]

#### Green Acres Investments, *Appellant,*v. Allen E. Lathrop, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kitsap County, No. 99-2-00466-5, Terry K. McCluskey, J., entered August 10, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, A.C.J., concurred in by Seinfeld and Houghton, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21




|                                             |  |                 
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------
|                                             |  | State or Other  
|                                             |  | Jurisdiction of 
|                                             |  | Incorporation or
|Name of Subsidiary                           |  | Organization    
|                                             |  |                 
|Manufacturera International Apparel, S.A.    |  | Honduras        
|OshKosh BGosh Asia/ Pacific Ltd. (Inactive) |  | Hong Kong       
|OshKosh BGosh Investments, Inc.             |  | Nevada          
|OshKosh BGosh Retail, Inc.                  |  | Delaware        
|OBG Distribution Company, LLC                |  | Wisconsin       
|OBG Manufacturing Company                    |  | Kentucky        
|OBG Product Development and Sales, Inc.      |  | Delaware        
|OshKosh BGosh Operations, LLC               |  | Wisconsin       
|Millennia Manufacturing SRL de CV            |  | Mexico          

60
RCRA CLUSTERS XXI AND XXII REVISED AUTHORIZATION APPLICATION 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

INTRODUCTION (Included in Application Letter Category) 

ADDu,mUM TO PROGRAM DESCRIPTION (dated February, 2015) 

APPENDICES 

I. REVISED ATTORNEY GFNERAL'S STATEMENT (signed 1/9115) 

II RCRA CLUSTERS XVIII, XIX and XX ADDENDUM TO PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 

III 20J4IDEQ ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE CHART (program description) 

IV. THE 2014 ANNUAL RCRA GRANT WORKPLAN (program description) 

V. Revised RCRA MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (signed 2/4/15) 

VI. RCRA DATA MANAGEMENT LETTER OF AGRF FMrNT(6117/03)(program 

descri ption) 

VII. IDAHO I-lAND! ER COUNT ACTIVITY REPORT (dated 7/2114) (program description) 

VIII. IDAHO PERMITTING SIX QUARTER PLAN (compiled 7/25114)(program description) 

IX. HAZARDOUS WAST E MANAG EMENT IN IDAHO - 2013 (program description) 

X. ReRA CLUSTERS Xx] and XXll REGULATORY SUMMARIES(regulations) 

XI. IDAHO RULES AND STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE(4/4113)(regulations) 

XII. fDAI-IO HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT (2013 CPS) (statute) 

XIII. fDAHO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND HEALTH ACT(20 13 CPS)(statute) 

XIV. IDAHO PUBLIC RECORDS ACT (2013 CPS) (statute)
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Donald L. Drakeman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Medarex, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report of Medarex, Inc. on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Medarex, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                           |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 15, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    DONALD L. DRAKEMAN
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                           | 
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                     |  | Donald L. Drakeman                   
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



Signed originals of
these written statements required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of these written statements required by Section 906, have
been provided to Medarex, Inc. and will be retained by Medarex, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This Certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 15(d) and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15
U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.