alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Oscar WALTERS et al., Appellants, v. DOZIER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 7956.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

Feb. 7, 1934.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 21, 1934.

T. Wade Potter, of Littlefield, for appellants.

White, Taylor & Gardner, of Austin, for ap-pellee.

BLAIR; Justice.

This appeal is from an order overruling the plea of privilege of appellant to be sued *285in Lamb county, his domicile. The plea was duly controverted by appellee, and venue was sustained in Travis county, upon the ground that the suit was upon a paving assessment certificate and a mechanic’s lien contract, which under its terms was payable in Travis county. The same issues here involved were determined adversely to appellant in the cases of R. M. Smith et al. v. Dozier Construction Company, 66 S.W.(2d) 744 (recently decided by this court), and John Stehlick et al. v. Dozier Construction Company, 68 S.W.(2d) 284 (this day decided by this court); and upon the authority of said cases the judgm'ent of the trial court will be affirmed.

Affirmed.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeals of

-- Pratt & Whitney, a division ofUnited

Technologies Corporation Under Contract No. SP0400-01-D-9405 APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 59940, 59941, 59942

David Z. Bodenheimer, Esq.

Crowell & Moring LLP Washington, DC Michael W. Dixon, Esq.

Associate Counsel, Military Engines Pratt & Whitney Col Matthew J. Mulbarger, USAF

Air Force ChiefTrial Attorney Alexis Bernstein, Esq.

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 18 November 2015

Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANos. 59940, 59941, 59942, Appeals of Pratt & Whitney, a division ofUnited Technologies Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
```

[Federal Register: March 31, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 62)]
[Notices]               
[Page 17818-17819]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr31mr11-25]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Friday, April 8, 2011; 9:30 a.m. EDT.

PLACE: 624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public.
    Portions of this meeting may be held in closed session.

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Management and Operations:
     Staff Director's report
III. Ethics Officer Presentation
IV. Program Planning:
     Update on Inter-student Violence Report
V. State Advisory Committee Issues:
     Re-chartering the Illinois SAC

[[Page 17819]]

     Re-chartering the Minnesota SAC
     Re-chartering the Alabama SAC
VI. Approval of March 11, 2011 Meeting Minutes
VII. Announcements
VIII. Adjourn

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. Hearing-impaired persons who will 
attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact Pamela Dunston at (202) 376-8105 or at 
signlanguage@usccr.gov at least three business days before the 
scheduled date of the meeting.

    Dated: March 29, 2011.
Kimberly A. Tolhurst,
Senior Attorney-Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2011-7765 Filed 3-29-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 24

- 00301

- CV

JK HOSPITALITY LLC ; Shiva Management, Inc.; Manishbhai Bhakta; Aum Unity Lodging, Inc.; and Sai Unity Lodging, Inc., Appellants

v.

Jignasa PATEL

, Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court

, Frio County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19

- 05

- 00195CVF Honorable Jennifer Dillingham , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMIS SED. Costs of court for this appeal are taxed against Appellants.

SIGNED May 8, 2024.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by reference in the Registration Statements
(Numbers  333-25979,  333-69410,  333-122575 and 333-159686) on Form S-8 and the
Registration  Statement  (Number  333-130629) on Form S-3 of Orbit International
Corp.  and Subsidiaries of our report dated March 31, 2010 relating to our audit
of  the  consolidated  financial  statements as of December 31, 2009 and for the
year  then  ended,  which  appears  in  this annual Report on Form 10-K of Orbit
International  Corp.  and  Subsidiaries  for  the  year ended December 31, 2010.


/S/ AMPER, POLITZINER & MATTIA, LLP

New York, New York
March 31, 2011
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orion Acquisition Corp. II (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

May 24, 2004                       By: /s/ Anthony DiGiandomenico
                                       --------------------------
                                   Anthony DiGiandomenico
                                   Chief Financial Officer
OPTICAL COATING LABORATORY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                EXHIBIT 21.  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in 1948. The
Company was reincorporated in California in 1963 and again reincorporated
in Delaware November 2, 1987.

Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc. has the following subsidiaries:

                                                     PERCENT OF    PLACE OF
SUBSIDIARY NAME                                      OWNERSHIP  INCORPORATION


OCLI International Service Corporation................ 100%      California

OCLI Foreign Sales Corporation.......................  100%            Guam

OCLI Optical Coating Laboratory, Ltd.................. 100%        Scotland

OCLI Optical Coating Laboratory GmbH.................. 100%         Germany

MMG Glastechnik GmbH.................................. 100%         Germany

OCLI Optical Coatings Espana S.A...................... 100%           Spain

Optical Coating Laboratory B.V........................ 100%     Netherlands

Optical Coating Laboratory EURL....................... 100%          France

Flex Products, Inc....................................  60%        Delaware

Hakuto-OCLI, Ltd. (OCLI Asia).........................  50%           Japan
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of WellPoint Health Networks Inc. (the“Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Leonard D. Schaeffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.   The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August  14, 2003 | /s/ Leonard  D. Schaeffer |                     |
|------------------------|---------------------------|--------------------------|
|                   |                      | Leonard D.  Schaeffer    |
|                   |                      | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, orother document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 32

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GCI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald A. Duncan,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


Date:  February 16, 2005                /s/
                                       Ronald A. Duncan
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       GCI, Inc.


                                        1
<PAGE>
          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GCI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John M. Lowber, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.



Date:  February 16, 2005                /s/
                                       John M. Lowber
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       GCI, Inc.


                                        2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7161

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

DUNDRIELLE LEFRANK BLAKENEY, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, 

Senior District Judge. (3:02-cr-00140-GCM-1) 

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 21, 2009 

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Reita Pauline Pendry, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. 

Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Dundrielle Lefrank Blakeney appeals the district 

court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion 

for a reduced sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Blakeney, No. 

3:02-cr-00140-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. June 9, 2009). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation of our report dated December 11, 2003 on the
financial statements of ADDvantage Technologies Group, Inc. as of September 30,
2003, and for the years ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, included in this Form
10-KSB Annual Report of ADDvantage Technologies Group, Inc. as of September 30,
2003, into ADDvantage Technologies Group Inc.'s previously filed Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-110645).


Tullius Taylor Sartain & Sartain LLP


Tulsa, Oklahoma
December 29, 2003
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EPMedSystems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), eachof the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company |

|                       |   |                                    |
|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| Date:    November 10, 2005 |   | /*s/ Matthew C. Hill*                   |
|                       |   | Matthew C.    Hill                      |
|                       |   | Chief    Financial Officer              |
|                       |   | (Principal    Financial Officer)   |
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Edward G. Newman, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Xybernaut Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
August 6, 2004
XYBERNAUT CORPORATION     /s/ EDWARD G. NEWMAN   Edward G. Newman Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2272 

To amend the Revised Statutes to grant State attorneys general the ability 

to issue subpoenas to investigate suspected violations of State laws that 

are applicable to national banks. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 21, 2017 

Ms. HARRIS (for herself, Ms. WARREN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Revised Statutes to grant State attorneys 

general the ability to issue subpoenas to investigate suspected violations of State laws that are applicable to 

national banks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VISITORIAL POWERS. 

4 The sixth undesignated paragraph of section 5240 of 

5 the Revised Statutes (12 U.S.C. 484) is amended by strik6 ing subparagraph (B) and inserting the following: 

7 ‘‘(B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A)— 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2272 IS

1 ‘‘(i) lawfully authorized State auditors and 

2 examiners may, at reasonable times and upon 

3 reasonable notice to a bank, review its records 

4 solely to ensure compliance with applicable 

5 State unclaimed property or escheat laws upon 

6 reasonable cause to believe that the bank has 

7 failed to comply with such laws; and 

8 ‘‘(ii) an attorney general (or other chief 

9 law enforcement officer) of a State may issue 

10 subpoenas or administer oversight and examina11 tion to national banks or officers of national 

12 banks based upon reasonable cause to believe 

13 that the national bank or an officer of a na14 tional bank has failed to comply with applicable 

15 State laws.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 10.2DEED IN LIEU OFFORECLOSURE AGREEMENT(Lenexa, Kansas)**     THIS DEED IN LIEU OF FORECLOSURE AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made as of July 31, 2003 between FANNIE MAE, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America (the "Lender"), ALS KANSAS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Borrower"), and ALTERRA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the “Key Principal”).RECITALS:This Agreement is based upon the following recitals:     A.        On July 16, 1999, Amresco Capital, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Original Lender”), made a loan to Borrower (the “Loan”).       B.        The Loan is evidenced by the documents described on the Schedule of Loan Documents attached hereto and incorporated herein, which schedule also defines certain terms hereinafter appearing in this Agreement.     C.        The Loan is secured by the Mortgage which encumbers certain real and personal property more particularly described therein (the “Property”).       D.        Lender is the holder of the Note and Loan pursuant to the Loan Assignment Documents.     E.        Pursuant to its original terms, the Note was to mature  and all principal and interest and other amounts owing pursuant to the Loan Documents (as hereinafter defined) were to become fully due and payable on August 1, 2009 (the “Maturity Date”).     F.        The principal balance of the Note, all accrued but unpaid interest through the Maturity Date, all interest accrued and continuing to accrue after the Maturity Date and all other amounts owing pursuant to the Loan Documents, including applicable attorneys' fees and costs, are collectively referred to herein as the “Indebtedness.”     G.        Borrower has failed to pay principal, interest and certain other amounts due in respect of the Indebtedness (the “Payment Default”).     H.        Lender has declared the entire balance of the Loan to be immediately due and payable, and is entitled to immediately commence any and all of its remedies for Borrower's defaults. I.        Key Principal is the subject of a Chapter 11 proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the "Proceeding") in which an Agreed Order for Adequate Protection and Relief from the Automatic Stay (Fannie Mae) has been entered on May 12, 2003 (the “Order”).