alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FILM ROMAN, INC., AS OF AND FOR THE THREE
MONTH AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      14,301,991              14,301,991
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,132,252               1,132,252
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                 16,588,144              16,588,144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       2,136,011               2,136,011
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,336,958               1,336,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,353,963              33,353,963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        85,223                  85,223
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,405,285              17,405,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,353,963              33,353,963
<SALES>                                      8,057,408              17,358,118
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,057,408              17,358,118
<CGS>                                        7,620,311              16,589,106
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,620,311              16,589,106
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,332,623               2,637,692
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             177,087                 384,534
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (718,439)             (1,484,146)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (718,439)             (1,484,146)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (718,439)             (1,484,146)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)                  (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### INTERNATIONAL-GREAT NORTHERN R. CO. v. LUCAS et al.

Motion No. 12750; No. 2016—6751.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.

Jan. 13, 1937.

Sewell, Taylor, Morris & Garwood and W. J. Knight, all of Houston, and B. F. Davis, of Jacksonville, for plaintiff in error.

King, Wood & Morrow and H. E. Cox, all of Houston, Seale & Thompson, of Nacogdoches, Norman & Norman, of Rusk, G. W. Gibson, of Jacksonville, and Smithdeal, Shook, Spence & Bowyer, of Dallas, for defendants in error.

HARVEY, Commissioner.

In our original opinion, filed December 9, 1936, in the above cause, the judgment of the trial court and that of the Court of Civil Appeals [70 S.W.(2d) 226] were ordered reversed and the cause remanded. G. E. Lucas, one of the defendants in error, has filed a motion to correct our opinion in the respect stated, to the extent of affirming the judgment of the trial court and that of the Court of Civil Appeals in so far as the cross action by the plaintiff in error against G. E. Lucas is involved. To the extent stated, the motion is granted, and our original opinion is here now corrected and amended so as to show, as was originally intended, that the judgment of the trial court and that of the Court of Civil Appeals are affirmed, so far as the cross action of the plaintiff in error against G. E. Lucas is involved; - but in all other respects the judgments of both said courts are reversed and the cause is remanded. The clerk is directed to correct the judgment of this court accordingly.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1944 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1944

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to allow the Commissioner 
   of Social Security to waive the 30-day residency requirement for 
 receipt of supplemental security income benefits for individuals who 
 evacuate from certain territories of the United States as a result of 
                   an emergency or natural disaster.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 5, 2017

  Mr. Nelson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to allow the Commissioner 
   of Social Security to waive the 30-day residency requirement for 
 receipt of supplemental security income benefits for individuals who 
 evacuate from certain territories of the United States as a result of 
                   an emergency or natural disaster.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disaster Income Assistance Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO WAIVE 30-DAY RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT.

    Section 1611(f) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382(f)) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Notwithstanding'' and 
        inserting ``(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), 
        notwithstanding''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(B) The Commissioner of Social Security may waive the requirement 
in subparagraph (A) that an eligible individual who has been outside 
the United States for any period of 30 consecutive days shall be 
treated as remaining outside the United States until such individual 
has been in the United States for a period of 30 consecutive days in 
the case of any eligible individual or categories of eligible 
individuals who evacuate from an emergency area located in the 
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, or 
American Samoa during an emergency period to one of the 50 States or 
the District of Columbia. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the 
terms `emergency area' and `emergency period' shall have the meaning 
given such terms in section 1135(g)(1).''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-20724

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CARLOS TREJO-DOMINGUEZ, also known as Carlos Dominguez Trejo, also 

known as Carlos Hernandez-Herrera,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CR-365-1

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Carlos Trejo-Dominguez

raises an argument that is now foreclosed by United States v. GonzalezLongoria, 831 F.3d 670 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 

29, 2016) (No. 16-6259). Trejo also contends that the district court erred by 

entering judgment reflecting a conviction under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2), but the 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 15, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-20724 Document: 00513798330 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2016
No. 15-20724

2

judgment actually reflects the appropriate conviction under § 1326(b)(1).

Accordingly, the government’s unopposed motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The 

government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is 

DENIED as moot.

 Case: 15-20724 Document: 00513798330 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/15/2016
*OPINION ISSUED FEBRUARY 20, 2009*

#### JOHN HAID AND AMBER HAID VS. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

(CC-07-0304)

Claimants appeared *pro se.*

Andrew F. Tarr, Attorney at Law, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

*238This claim was submitted to the Court for decision upon a Stipulation entered into by claimants and respondent wherein certain facts and circumstances of the claim were agreed to as follows:

1. At approximately 8:00 a.m. on September 25,2007, claimant Dr. John Haid, was driving his 2007 Audi A4 on McCullough Road/Miller Road in Huntington, Cabell County, when his vehicle struck a hole in the road. The hole extended across the width of the lane of traffic, and he could not have avoided the hole due to oncoming traffic. Dr. Haid had notified respondent of this condition prior to the incident.

2. Respondent was responsible forthe maintenance of McCulloughRoad/Miller Road which it failed to maintain properly on the date of this incident.

3. As a result of this incident, claimants’ vehicle sustained damage to its right, rear rim ($451.26), and the tires had to be rotated and balanced ($47.65). Thus, claimants’ damages total $498.91. Claimants’ insurance deductible at the time of the incident was $500.00.

4. Respondent agrees that the amount of $498.91 for the damages put forth by the claimants is fair and reasonable.

The Court has reviewed the facts of the claim and finds that respondent was negligent in its maintenance of McCullough Road/Miller Road on the date of this incident; that the negligence of respondent was the proximate cause of the damages sustained to claimants’ vehicle; and that the amount of damages agreed to by the parties is fair and reasonable. Thus, claimants may make a recovery for their loss.

Accordingly, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award in the amount of $498.91.

Award of $498.91.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,146
<SECURITIES>                                     2,081
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                        50
<INVENTORY>                                     11,332
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,259
<PP&E>                                          12,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,791
<BONDS>                                         22,637
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,666
<COMMON>                                        56,091
<OTHER-SE>                                     (46,457)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,844
<SALES>                                          4,026
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,026
<CGS>                                            3,190
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,667
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,764)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,764)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,764)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.51)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.30

                              AMENDMENT NO. 1
                          TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


      Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated as of March 7, 1998
(the "Employment Agreement") between Riddell Sports Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), and David Groelinger.

      WHEREAS, Mr. Groelinger has been elected Chief Financial Officer and
Executive Vice President of the Company.

      WHEREAS, the Employment Agreement, unless extended, expires on March
7, 1998 and the Company wishes to provide Mr. Groelinger incentives to
continue providing excellent leadership to the Company and to extend the
term of the Employment Agreement.

      NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged the parties hereto agree as follows:

      1.    Section 2 of the Employment  Agreement be and hereby is amended
            to provide in full as follows:

            "2.   Term. This Agreement is for a term ("Term")
                        commencing on the date of this Agreement
                        and terminating on March 7, 2000, or upon
                        the Executive's earlier death, disability
                        or other termination of employment
                        pursuant to Section 11."

      2.    All other  provisions on the Employment  Agreement shall remain
            in full force and effect.

Dated: March 10, 1998                     RIDDELL SPORTS INC.

                                          By:   /s/ DAVID MAUER
                                                David Mauer
                                          Its:  Chief Executive Officer

                                                EXECUTIVE

                                                /s/ DAVID GROELINGER
                                                David Groelinger
EXHIBIT 23


         Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 333-01051 and No. 333-01053) of Oshkosh B'Gosh, Inc.
of our report dated February 2, 1996, with respect to the consolidated 
financial statements of Oshkosh B'Gosh, Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1995.


                                            /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
           
Milwaukee, Wisconsin                          Ernst & Young, LLP
March 22, 1996
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1998
<CASH>                                          68,420
<SECURITIES>                                    50,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,042
<PP&E>                                         414,272
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 602,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,479
<BONDS>                                        360,163
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       175,100
<OTHER-SE>                                    (17,940)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   602,033
<SALES>                                         46,484
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,484
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    27
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 729
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,583
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,583
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,583
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
## O'toole , Catherin e (OST)

Subject : FW : Follo wu p t o phon e cal l •,-- ; -[..- r^, -

From : O'toole , Catherin e (OSr ) ^ ' ' '- b Sent : Thursday , Apri l 28 , 201 1 12:2 7 P M To : 'DAVI D HERNANDEZ ' Cc : 'Scot t Zemnick ' Subject : Follo wu p t o phon e cal l Regardin g VPAA' s applicatio n fo rtransfe ro fGulfstream' s commute rauthority , I hav e severa l follo wu p question s regardin g you rapplication . 1 . Regardin g th e pre-operatin g cost s -Whe n wil l th e approximatel y$18. 7 \M\\ox \ i n fund s hel d i n escro wwil l b e released ? 2 . VPCA' s balanc e shee t refer s t o $6. 8 millio n i n recievable s du e fro m "Affiliate d Parties" . Wh o ar e th e Affiliate d Parties ? 3 . Pleas e provid e 3^'

* part yverificatio n o fappro x$18.1 5 millio n availabl e t o VPAAi n orde rt o mee t th e Department' s financia l fitnes s test . I fth e S" * part yverificatio n o rline-of-credi t i s bein g supplie d b ya n individua l o rorganizatio n (othe rtha n a recognize d financia l institution ) citizenshi p information , an d copie s ofth e persona l o rcorporat e financia l statement s ofth e individua l o rorganizatio n shoul d als o b e provided . 4 . D o Fun d 1 an d Fun d I I inves t i n othe rentities ? Pleas e describe .
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2679 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2679

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
 To provide access to and manage the distribution of excess or surplus 
               property to veteran-owned small businesses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Small Business Enhancement 
Act of 2018''.
SEC. 2. ACCESS TO SURPLUS PROPERTY FOR VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESSES.
    Section 32 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657b) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Access to Surplus Property for Veteran-owned Small 
Businesses.--
        ``(1) Definitions.--In this subsection--
            ``(A) the term `foreign excess property' has the meaning 
        given the term in section 102 of title 40, United States Code; 
        and
            ``(B) the term `state agency' has the meaning given the 
        term, including the roles and responsibilities assigned, in 
        section 549 of title 40, United States Code.
        ``(2) Requirement.--The Administrator, in coordination with the 
    Administrator of General Services, shall provide access to and 
    manage the distribution of surplus property, and foreign excess 
    property returned to a State for handling as surplus property, 
    owned by the United States under chapter 7 of title 40, United 
    States Code, to small business concerns owned and controlled by 
    veterans (as verified by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under 
    section 8127 of title 38, United States Code) pursuant to a 
    memorandum of agreement between the Administrator, the 
    Administrator of General Services, and the head of the applicable 
    state agency for surplus properties and in accordance with section 
    549 of title 40, United States Code.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### Frank KOSLOSKY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 18733.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 20, 1937.

Tom B. Bartlett, of Marlin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of theft of chickens, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the county jail for a term of ninety days and a fine of $200.

This is a companion case to that of Miller v. State, 101 S.W.(2d) 235, this day decided. The same questions are raised in this case as were raised in that case. Hence we do not deem it necessary to again enter upon an extended discussion thereof, further than to say that all of the matters complained of are overruled for the reasons stated in said case of Miller v. State, supra. The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
EXHIBIT (21)

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF OSMONICS, INC.

            Percentage
            Ownership

              100%  VAPONICS, INC.               A Massachusetts Corp.

              100%  AQUA MEDIA INTERNATIONAL     A Delaware Corporation

              100%  PORETICS CORPORATION         A Delaware Corporation

              100%  OSMONICS ASIA/PACIFIC LTD.   A Hong Kong Corporation

              100%  OSMONICS EUROPA, S.A.        A Switzerland Corp.

              100%  OSMONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.  A Jamaica Corporation

              100%  OSMONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC. A Minnesota Corporation

              100%  OZONE RESEARCH &
                    EQUIPMENT CORP.              An Arizona Corporation

              100%  GHIA, INC.                   A Nevada Corporation

              100%  AUTOTROL CORPORATION         A Wisconsin Corporation

              100%  NIPPON OSMONICS LTD.         A Japan Corporation

              100%  AUTOTROL S.A.                A France Corporation

              100%  OSMONICS INT'L SALES CORP.   A Virgin Is. Corp.

              100%  MICROL SYSTEMS, LTD.         An England Corporation

              100%  PETECO CORPORATION           A Minnesota Corporation

              100%  DESALINATION SYSTEMS, INC.   A California Corp.

              100%  DESALINATION SYSTEMS
                    INTERNATIONAL INC.           A Virgin Islands Corp.

               50%  NIPPON AUTOTROL K.K.         A Japan Corporation

              100%  AQUAMATIC, INC.              A Delaware Corporation