alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of GCI, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald A. Duncan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:  March 5, 2008 | /s/ Ronald A. Duncan    |
|----------------------|-------------------------|
|                 | Ronald A. Duncan        |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer |
|                 | GCI, Inc.               |

 

 

 

1
[No. 35513.

Department Two.

December 1, 1960.]

#### San Juan County, *Respondent,*v. Peder M. Hage *et al., Appellants.*
      *1*

*Peder M. Hage*and *Eleanor J. Hage, pro se.*

‘Reported in 357 P. (2d) 166.

Per Curiam.

— This action was brought to enjoin the defendants from obstructing a county road owned and maintained by the plaintiff. The defendants claimed that the portion of the road in question was constructed upon their property. Upon conflicting evidence, the court found that the road was located upon the property of the county and enjoined further interference with its use by the defendants.

The defendants’ arguments relate to the facts of the case, and they assume that the court was obliged to accept the testimony favorable to their position and reject that which was opposed to it. There is, of course, no merit in this assumption.

Nowhere in the brief is any portion of the findings of fact, which the defendants claim to be erroneous, set forth, as required by Rules on Appeal 42. (1) (f) and 43, RCW Vol. O. Consequently, they are the established facts of the case. *Steele v. Queen City Broadcasting Co.,*54 Wn. (2d) 402, 341 P. (2d) 499; *Wheeler v. Fruhling,*54 Wn. (2d) 483, 341 P. (2d) 874. Since they unquestionably support the judgment, the latter must be affirmed.

It is so ordered.
**Exhibit 15.01**

 

 

 

May 14, 2003

 

 

Securities and ExchangeCommission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Commissioners:

 

                We are aware that our report dated April 22, 2003 onour review of interim financial information of WellPoint Health Networks Inc.(the “Company”) as of and for the period ended March 31, 2003 and included inthe Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended isincorporated by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos.333-05111, 333-33013, 333-42073, 333-81687, 333-90791, 333-37958, 333-55314,333-81872, 333-103481 and 333-83462), Form S-3 (File No. 333-08519 and333-101475) and Form S-4 (File No. 333-73382).

 

Very truly yours,

 

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP |
|---------------------------------|
| PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP      |

 

 

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-65721, 333-40697, 333-34677, 33-65412, 33-97512, 33-65414 and 33-88114 of
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated March 12,
1999, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pacific Sunwear of
California, Inc. for the year ended January 31, 1999.


                                        DELOITTE & TOUCHE
Costa Mesa, California
April 9, 1999
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
  



 
 

Exhibit 10.198    
    


AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT  


        This Amendment ("Amendment") to Management Agreement, effective as of February 1, 2004 (this "Amendment")
to that certain Management Agreement made and entered into as of January 1, 2003 (the "Agreement") is entered into by and between Pinnacle Health Resources ("Manager") and StarCare Medical
Group, Inc. dba Gateway Medical Group, Inc. ("IPA") (collectively as the "Parties"). 


RECITALS  



	A.
	Pursuant
to the Agreement, Manager manages IPA.



	B.
	The
parties desire to amend the Agreement in order to provide Manager the ability to advance money to IPA from time to time and IPA the obligation to repay any such advance. 




        Capitalized
terms used herein but not defined shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement. 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 


AMENDMENT  


        1.    Article II—Compensation.    Article II of the Management
Agreement, entitled Compensation, shall be amended by adding the following at the end of such article: 



"Should
the funds in IPA's accounts not be sufficient at any time during the term of this Agreement to make disbursements and to meet the IPA's financial obligations for the cost of providing services
under the Payor Contracts, Manager shall have the right (but not the obligation) to loan to IPA funds in an amount sufficient to allow IPA to meet its financial obligations. Such loan shall bear
interest at a rate that is at or above fair market value and shall have such other terms as the parties may agree from time to time. Manager shall not lend any funds to IPA for such purposes without
the prior approval of IPA's Board of Directors or the officer(s) of IPA delegated such power of approval by IPA's Board of Directors. 




        2.    Further Assurances.    Each Party hereto agrees to execute such other documents and take
such other actions as may be reasonably necessary or desirable to confirm or effectuate the agreements contemplated in this Amendment. 


        3.    Continuing Agreement.    Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect. In the event of any conflict between any provision of this Amendment and any provision of the Agreement, the provision of this Amendment shall control. 


1







 



        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment to Management Agreement as of the date first written above. 



	"IPA"	 	"Manager"
	

STARCARE MEDICAL GROUP, INC. DBA GATEWAY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., a California professional medical corporation	
 	

PINNACLE HEALTH RESOURCES, a California corporation
	

 	
 	

 
	/s/  JACOB Y. TERNER, M.D.      
 Jacob Y. Terner, M.D.

President and CEO	 	/s/  R. STEWART KAHN      
 R. Stewart Kahn

Executive Vice President




2











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.198
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      11,562,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               29,864,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (627,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 12,013,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            59,415,000
<PP&E>                                      13,394,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (9,030,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              72,177,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       37,169,000
<BONDS>                                        156,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,851,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                72,177,000
<SALES>                                     21,291,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,551,000
<CGS>                                       13,527,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,720,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (97,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,910,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,172,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,738,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,738,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, Colin W. Stewart, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, andNancy C. Broadbent, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
|                     |   |                    |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                     |   |                    |
| Dated: May 8,  2006 |   | /s/ Colin W. Stewart    |
|                     |   | Colin W. Stewart        |
|                     |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|                     |   |                    |
|                     |   |                    |
| Dated: May 8,  2006 |   | /s/ Nancy C. Broadbent  |
|                     |   | Nancy C. Broadbent      |
|                     |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### OLIVER v. STATE.

No. 16583.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 14, 1934.

J. P. Simpson and J. D. McComb, both of Jacksboro, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

An opinion affirming the judgment of conviction was handed down on May 2, 1934. Pending a motion for rehearing our attention is called to the form of the indictment. The count upon which conviction was obtained alleged the possession for sale in Jack county of liquor capable of producing intoxication. No further description of the liquor appears in the indictment.

In view of the Constitutional Amendment to section 20, art. 16, adopted in 1933, and the laws enacted thereunder (Acts 43d Leg. Reg. Sess. (1933), c. 116, p. 288 [Vemon’s Ann. I-\ C. art. 694a]), the present indictment charges no offense. The reasons are stated in Offield v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 75 S.W. (2d) 882, opinion of date October 31, 1934.

The motion for rehearing is granted, the opinion of affirmance is withdrawn, and the judgmenL is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed under the present indictment.
#### WOOLDRIDGE v. STATE.

No. 15552.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 18, 1933.

McGaugh & Darroch and Early & Johnson, all of Brownwood, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, P. J.

Unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The indictment appears regular and regularly presented. The evidence which was heard in the trial court is not brought up for review. The absence of the facts precludes this court from appraising the action of the trial judge in refusing to give the special charges requested, likewise the exceptions to the court’s charge.

Binding no error in the record, the.judgment is affirmed.
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 271A/18 t

| | ISSN 1977-0987 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 271A |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 5818 ta' Awwissu 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0987

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 271A

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 5818 ta' Awwissu 2015

---

| Avviż Nru | Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Rettifika |
| 2015/C 271A/01 | Rettifika tal-avviż tal-kompetizzjonijiet ġenerali — Interpreti tal-konferenzi (AD 5/AD 7) — EPSO/AD/311/15 — Lingwa Ċeka (CS) — EPSO/AD/312/15 — Lingwa Kroata (HR) — EPSO/AD/313/15 — Lingwa Litwana (LT) — EPSO/AD/314/15 — Lingwa Maltija (MT) ( ĠU C 224 A, 9.7.2015 ) | 1 |

Avviż Nru

Werrej

Paġna

Rettifika

2015/C 271A/01

Rettifika tal-avviż tal-kompetizzjonijiet ġenerali — Interpreti tal-konferenzi (AD 5/AD 7) — EPSO/AD/311/15 — Lingwa Ċeka (CS) — EPSO/AD/312/15 — Lingwa Kroata (HR) — EPSO/AD/313/15 — Lingwa Litwana (LT) — EPSO/AD/314/15 — Lingwa Maltija (MT) ( ĠU C 224 A, 9.7.2015 )

( ĠU C 224 A, 9.7.2015 )

1

---

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

Rettifika

| 18.8.2015 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | CA 271/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2015

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

CA 271/1

---

Rettifika tal-avviż tal-kompetizzjonijiet ġenerali

Interpreti tal-konferenzi (AD 5/AD 7)

EPSO/AD/311/15 — Lingwa Ċeka (CS)

EPSO/AD/312/15 — Lingwa Kroata (HR)

EPSO/AD/313/15 — Lingwa Litwana (LT)

EPSO/AD/314/15 — Lingwa Maltija (MT)

(
  Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea C 224 A tad-9 ta’ Lulju 2015
  )

(2015/C 271 A/01)

F’paġna 1:

minflok:

“
  Id-data tal-għeluq għar-reġistrazzjoni: il-11 ta’ Awwissu 2015 f’12.00 (nofsinhar), ħin ta’ Brussell
  ”,

aqra:

aqra:

“
  Id-data tal-għeluq għar-reġistrazzjoni: it-18 ta’ Awwissu 2015 f’12.00 (nofsinhar), ħin ta’ Brussell
  ”;

F’paġna 5:

minflok:

minflok:

“META U FEJN NISTA’ NAPPLIKA?

Applika onlajn fuq is-sit tal-EPSO http://jobs.eu-careers.eu sa:

l-11 ta’ Awwissu 2015 f’12.00 (nofsinhar), ħin ta’ Brussell
  .”,

aqra:

aqra:

“META U FEJN NISTA’ NAPPLIKA?

Applika onlajn fuq is-sit tal-EPSO http://jobs.eu-careers.eu sa:

t-18 ta’ Awwissu 2015 f’12.00 (nofsinhar), ħin ta’ Brussell.
  ”.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1229

KENNETH JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CLIFTON J. GORDY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:20-cv-00112-GLR)

Submitted: August 20, 2020 Decided: August 24, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Gordy, No. 1:20-cv-00112-GLR (D. Md. 

Feb. 4, 2020). We deny Johnson’s motion to remand. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ADVANCE
PARADIGM, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          54,562
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                       135
<INVENTORY>                                      1,912
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,058
<PP&E>                                          11,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,898
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            78
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,491
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,433
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               192,140
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  183,987
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,527
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,398)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,024
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,909
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,115
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,115
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2247 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2247

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a consistent 
   eligibility date for provision of Department of Veterans Affairs 
  memorial headstones and markers for eligible spouses and dependent 
   children of veterans whose remains are unavailable, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 19, 2017

Mr. Heller (for himself and Mr. Tester) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a consistent 
   eligibility date for provision of Department of Veterans Affairs 
  memorial headstones and markers for eligible spouses and dependent 
   children of veterans whose remains are unavailable, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF VETERANS' SPOUSES AND DEPENDENT CHILDREN 
              WHOSE REMAINS ARE UNAVAILABLE FOR DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS MEMORIAL HEADSTONES AND MARKERS.

    Section 2306(b)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``The'' and inserting 
        ``An individual who dies on or after November 11, 1998, who is 
        the''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``An'' and inserting 
        ``An individual who dies on or after November 11, 1998, who is 
        an''.
                                 <all>
```
DISMISS and Opinion Filed March 28, 2014 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00162-CV 

GWENDOLYN JEANETTE WATEL, Appellant 

V. 

DUMANN REALTY, LLC, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-12649-K 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Bridges, O’Neill, and Brown 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

In a letter dated March 6, 2014, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal. We 

instructed appellant to file a letter brief by March 17, 2014 addressing our concern and gave 

appellee an opportunity to respond. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a jurisdictional 

brief within the time requested would result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. As 

of today’s date, appellant has not filed a jurisdictional brief. 

Generally, this Court has jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments. See 

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A final judgment is one that 

disposes of all pending parties and claims. See id. An order denying a motion for judgment 

nunc pro tunc is not an appealable order. See Shadowbrook Apartments v. Abu-Ahmad, 783 

S.W.2d 210, 211 (Tex. 1990). 
 –2– 

In her notice of appeal, appellant stated she is appealing the trial court’s order denying 

her “Motion for Judgment to Correct Clerical Mistake (Nunc Pro Tunc) and Motion to Void 

Domesticated Foreign Judgment and Orders to Enforce Corrected Domesticated Foreign 

Judgment.” The foreign judgment was filed in the trial court on September 9, 2011. We note 

that appellant appealed the domesticated foreign judgment in an earlier appeal. We dismissed 

that appeal, however, because her notice of appeal was untimely. 

The order appellant has now appealed from is not an appealable order. See Shadowbrook 

Apartments, 783 S.W.2d at 211. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). 

 

140162F.P05 

 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

GWENDOLYN JEANETTE WATEL, 

Appellant 

No. 05-14-00162-CV V. 

DUMANN REALTY, LLC, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas. 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-12649-K. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. 

Justices O’Neill and Brown, participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee, DUMANN REALTY, LLC, recover its costs of this 

appeal from appellant, GWENDOLYN JEANETTE WATEL. 

Judgment entered March 28, 2014 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Moore Medical Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 27, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Linda M. Autore, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Linda M. Autore                  
|Linda M. Autore                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|March 25, 2004