alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2745 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2745

   To establish a grant program to provide assistance to prevent and 
             repair damage to structures due to pyrrhotite.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2018

 Mr. Blumenthal (for himself and Mr. Murphy) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 
                       Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To establish a grant program to provide assistance to prevent and 
             repair damage to structures due to pyrrhotite.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Crumbling Foundations Small Business 
and Homeowners Assistance Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. GRANT PROGRAM.

    (a) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Administrator'' means 
the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
    (b) Authorization.--The Administrator shall award grants to States 
to provide assistance to owners of small businesses, condominium 
associations, and homeowners located within the State to prevent, 
mitigate, and repair damage to structures that have sustained or may 
sustain damage due to concrete foundations that contain pyrrhotite.
    (c) Application.--A covered State desiring a grant under this 
section shall submit an application to the Administrator at such time, 
in such manner, and accompanied by such information as the 
Administrator may require.
    (d) Use of Funds.--A State receiving a grant under this section 
shall use grant funds to provide full or partial reimbursement to 
affected owners of small businesses, condominium associations, and 
homeowners for the costs of prevention, mitigation and repair of damage 
described in subsection (b).
    (e) Grant Amount and Duration.--
            (1) Amount.--Each grant awarded to a State under this 
        section in a fiscal year shall be in an amount of not more than 
        $20,000,000.
            (2) Duration.--A grant awarded under this section--
                    (A) shall be for a period of 5 years; and
                    (B) may be renewed for not more than 3 additional 
                periods.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2019 through 2023.
                                 <all>
```
#### HAYWOOD v. STATE.

No. 20842.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 14, 1940.

E. B. Chambers and John H. Dittmar, both of San Antonio, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant, a female under the age of eighteen years, was convicted by a jury in the juvenile court and declared to be a delinquent child, and was committed to the Girls Training School at Gainesville, Texas, for an indeterminate term not extending beyond July 23, 1944.

She was tried upon a complaint and information, the latter reading in part as follows:

> “Now comes L. J. Gittinger, Assistant Criminal District Attorney of Bexar County, Texas, upon the affidavit of George D. Pickens, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and represents to the County Court of Bexar County, Texas, that on the 19th day of April 1939, one Odessa Haywood was a (female child and under the age of 18 years) residing in Bexar County, Texas, and before the making of this information was a delinquent child.

> “That said child is incorrigible; and that said child knowingly associates with thieves and idle persons; and that said child habitually wanders about the streets of the City of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, in the night time without being on any business or occupation; and the said child is and has been guilty of immoral conduct in public places, to-wit: in the streets of the City of San Antonio, Texas, and that on or about the 15th day of April A. D. 1939, in the County of Bexar, State of Texas, and before the making and filing of this information, did then and there unlawfully and voluntarily and with malice aforethought kill and murder Carrie Lee Thompson by then and there stabbing the said Carrie Lee Thompson with a knife, constituting the said Odessa Haywood a delinquent child, against the peace and dignity of -the State.”

Article 5143a, Vernon’s 1939 Cummula-tive Supplement to the Texas Statutes, passed by the Legislature in 19.37, defines a “delinquent child” as any boy between the ages of 10 and 17 years, and any girl *867between the ages of 10 and 18 years who violates any penal laws of,this State, etc. It will be noted from the above set forth information that nowhere therein is it alleged that appellant was over the age of ten years at the time of the making of the allegations.

We have heretofore recently held in the case of Rose et al. v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 129 S.W.2d 639, that it was necessary to charge in the indictment, or in the complaint and information, that the person so charged as being a delinquent child, in the case of a boy, that he was over the age of ten years and under the age of seventeen years; if a girl, as in this present instance, that she was over the age of ten years and under the age of eighteen years.

There being an absence of an allegation that appellant was over the age of ten years, under the authority of the above case we hold this complaint and information defective, and the judgment is reversed and the prosecution is therefore ordered dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          16,877
<SECURITIES>                                 3,500,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                  294,858
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (241,669)
<INVENTORY>                                     53,353
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,764,550
<PP&E>                                         389,017
<DEPRECIATION>                               (214,590)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,421,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,401,056
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,240,500
<COMMON>                                    11,617,332
<OTHER-SE>                                (13,825,226)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,421,416
<SALES>                                         85,084
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,084
<CGS>                                          373,521
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,816,271
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (366,781)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,471,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,471,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,471,689)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.23)
        

</TABLE>
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04803**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  04803\04803_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 04803\04803_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04803\04803_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04803\04803_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04803\04803_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04803\04803_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

04803\Certification Statement Plant ID 04803.pdf Plant certification statement x 04803\04803_telecon1.pdf Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents. x 04803\04803_telecon2.pdf Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents. x 04803\04803_telecon3.pdf Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents. x 04803\04803_telecon4.pdf Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents. x 04803\04803_telecon5.pdf Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents. x 04803\04803_telecon6.pdf Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents. x 04803\04803_telecon7.pdf Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents. x 04803\04803_telecon8.pdf Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents. x 04803\04803_telecon9.pdf Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents.

04803\Supplemental Documents\04803_MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04803\Supplemental Documents\04803_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04803\04803_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04803\04803_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 04803\04803_Followup Questions.xls Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents. x 04803\Copy of 04803_Followup Questions.xlsx Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents.

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in theSteam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### The Central Trust Co., Exr., Appellee, *v.*Morehead et al.; Hester, Appellant.

(No. 28559

Decided April 16, 1941.)

*Mr. Wm. J. Bielly,*for appellee.

*Mr. George 8. Hawke,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right he, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, DC 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported): November 17, 2015





Commission File Number 0-17071





FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)











INDIANA35-1544218(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(IRS Employer Identification No.)





200 East Jackson Street


P.O. Box 792


Muncie, IN 47305-2814


(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)





(765) 747-1500


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---










ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTS





On November 18, 2015, First Merchants Corporation issued a press release announcing the declaration of a cash dividend of $0.11 per share.  The cash dividend is payable on December 18, 2015 to stockholders of record as of December 4, 2015.  A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.





The information in this Form 8-K and the attached exhibit shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.





ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.





(a)        Not applicable.





(b)        Not applicable.





(c)        Not applicable.





(d)        Exhibits.











Exhibit 99.1Press Release dated November 18, 2015 issued by First Merchants Corporation











---




SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





First Merchants Corporation


(Registrant)





By: /s/Mark K. Hardwick


Mark K. Hardwick


Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)








Dated: November 18, 2015











---




EXHIBIT INDEX











Exhibit No.Description99.1Press Release, dated November 18, 2015 issued by First Merchants Corporation
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No’s. 33-20037, 33-68128, 333-75445 and 333-56448 of Moore Medical Corp. on Form S-8 andRegistration Statement No. 333-59688 of Moore Medical Corp. on Form S-3 of our report dated March 15, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Moore Medical Corp. as of and for the year ended December 27, 2003 appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Moore Medical Corp. for the year ended December 27, 2003. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Hartford, Connecticut 

March 25, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         381,685
<SECURITIES>                                 2,180,456
<RECEIVABLES>                                  548,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,219,348
<PP&E>                                          98,363
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,259,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,028,437
<BONDS>                                        464,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           696
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,084,975
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,259,048
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,757,241
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,555,467
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,064
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                168,097
<INCOME-TAX>                                    68,079
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            100,018
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   100,018
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.46
        

</TABLE>
#### RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS et al. v. GEORGE A. SCOTT TRUCK LINE.

No. 7904.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

Jan. 11, 1933.

See, also, 57 S.W.(2d) 285.

James V. Allred, Atty. Gen., and T. S. Christopher-, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.

Alton E. Stewart, of Dallas, for appellee.

BLAIR, Justice.

This case is one of the companion cases. The appellee has filed no brief in this case, but presented oral argument and relied on the same contentions made by the appellee in the Forwarding Company Case, 57 S.W.(2d) 290.

There was the additional allegation that this particular carrier served a territory some points in which there were no common carriers, and that other points may be reached by other common carriers only after having been transferred several times. These are matters which address themselves to the discretion of the commission in the administration of the Motor Transportation Act (see Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 911b), and since there are no specific facts alleged showing any unreasonable or unjust denial of transportation to any portion of the territory, the courts cannot interfere with the order of the Railroad Commission.

The temporary injunction granted by the trial court will be dissolved.

Injunction dissolved.
$\<ED ST4y 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105.3901 

W1tm 

Lewis Wallenmeyer, Director 

Clark County Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management 

500 S Grand Central Parkway, 1" Floor 

P.O. Box 555210 

Las Vegas, NV 89155-5210 

Dear Mr. Wallenmeyer: 

Thank you for your submission of the Annual Network Plan Report, June 2009. 

We have reviewed the submitted document and have found that the plan is complete, 

informative, very detailed and meets all of the requirements for annual network plans as 

required by our regulations set forth under 40 CFR Part 58.10. 

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at 

(4 15) 947-4226 or Michael Flagg at (4 15) 972-3372. 

Sincerely, - \ ,/' 

u 3:t:ger Air Quality Analysis Office 

cc: Tina M. Gingras, CCDAQEM 

Michael Sword, CCDAQEM 

Yousaf Harnmeed, CCDAQEM 

Michael Flagg, EPA 

Printed on Recycled Paper
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 275 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 275

      To allow the financing by United States persons of sales of 
                   agricultural commodities to Cuba.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 2, 2017

   Ms. Heitkamp (for herself, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Udall, Mr. Leahy, Mr. 
    Durbin, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. King, Ms. Collins, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. 
    Donnelly, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Warner, and Mr. Cochran) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To allow the financing by United States persons of sales of 
                   agricultural commodities to Cuba.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Agricultural Export Expansion Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. FINANCING OF SALES OF AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES TO CUBA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law (other 
than section 908 of the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement 
Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7207), as amended by subsection (c)), a person 
subject to the jurisdiction of the United States may provide payment or 
financing terms for sales of agricultural commodities to Cuba or an 
individual or entity in Cuba.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Agricultural commodity.--The term ``agricultural 
        commodity'' has the meaning given that term in section 102 of 
        the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 5602).
            (2) Financing.--The term ``financing'' includes any loan or 
        extension of credit.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 908 of the Trade Sanctions 
Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7207) is amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``and financing'';
            (2) by striking subsection (b);
            (3) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``Prohibition'' and all that 
                follows through ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding'' 
                and inserting ``In General.--Notwithstanding''; and
                    (B) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as 
                subsections (b) and (c), respectively, and by moving 
                those subsections, as so redesignated, 2 ems to the 
                left; and
            (4) by striking ``paragraph (1)'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``subsection (a)''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-4254

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. MICHAEL TRACY GARNETT, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge (2:07-cr-00146-1)

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 22, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark L. French, CRISWELL & FRENCH, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, Lisa G. Johnston, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Michael Tracy Garnett pled guilty to possession of a dangerous weapon in a federal facility, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 930(b) (2006). The district court sentenced Garnett to thirty months of imprisonment, to be followed by a three-year term of supervised release. Garnett contends on appeal that the district court clearly erred in denying a reduction in sentence for acceptance of responsibility, pursuant to U.S. Sentencing

Guidelines Manual § 3E1.1 (2007). Finding no reversible error,

we affirm.

A district court’s determination as to the defendant’s acceptance of responsibility is a factual question reviewed for

clear error. United States v. Ruhe , 191 F.3d 376, 388 (4th Cir. 1999). The burden is on the defendant to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that he is entitled to the adjustment. United States v. Urrego-Linares , 879 F.2d 1234, 1238-39 (4th Cir. 1989). A guilty plea does not automatically entitle a defendant to a reduction for acceptance of responsibility. See USSG § 3E1.1, comment. (n.3). A defendant may not be entitled to a sentencing adjustment for acceptance of responsibility if the defendant engages in conduct inconsistent with acceptance of responsibility. Id. In this case, the district court found by a preponderance of evidence that Garnett obstructed justice in unsuccessfully attempting to influence his

23 wife to testify falsely and that Garnett gave false testimony at sentencing in that regard. We find no clear error in the district court’s conclusion that Garnett’s conduct after he pled guilty was inconsistent with acceptance of responsibility. Accordingly, we affirm Garnett’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED