alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WWW.EXFILE.COM, INC. -- 888-775-4789 -- PERFORMANCE HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. -- EXHIBIT 10.134 TO FORM 10-Q


     

    EXHIBIT
10.134



    PERFORMANCE
HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

    427
Riverview Plaza

    Trenton,
NJ 08611

    Telephone:  (609)
656-0181

    Facsimile:  (609)
656-0869

    


    


    Dear
Holder of Promissory Notes dated April 4, 2006:

    


    The Company is requesting your consent
that the Promissory Note that was issued by the company on April 4, 2006 with an
extended maturity date of May 1 is not and will not be in default through
December 31, 2008

    


    


    Please take a moment to sign and return
your consent by facsimile to 609-656-0869.

    


    
      


       

      
        	As of September 1,
      2008 	Very truly yours,
      

                


                Dominique
      Prunetti Miller

                


                Dominique
      Prunetti Miller

                Secretary 

              


      

       



     

    The
Waiver is accepted and agreed by the undersigned noteholder:

    


    


    By:________________________________

    Name:

    Date:
EXHIBIT 32.1
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION*
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Dated: April 14, 2010
    By:
    /s/ James A. McGradyJames A. McGrady, Chief Executive Officer,President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer) *
    
    This Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall
not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of
1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
| **Royalties And Licenses (Schedule Of Royalty-Related Assets) (Details) (USD $)In Millions, unless otherwise specified** | Dec. 31, 2012 | Mar. 31, 2012 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Royalty-Related Assets**                                                                                               |          |          |
| Royalty-related assets                                                                                                   | $ 139         | $ 187         |
| Other current assets                                                                                                     |          |          |
| **Royalty-Related Assets**                                                                                               |          |          |
| Royalty-related assets                                                                                                   | 47            | 85            |
| Other assets                                                                                                             |          |          |
| **Royalty-Related Assets**                                                                                               |          |          |
| Royalty-related assets                                                                                                   | $ 92          | $ 102         |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Royalty Related Assets Current And Noncurrent
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**ea_RoyaltyRelatedAssetsCurrentAndNoncurrent**Namespace Prefix:**ea_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                       |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**ea_RoyaltyRelatedAssetsLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**ea_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 25, 2021

NO. 03

- 19

- 00109

- CV

Rosa E. Santis and Rosa Santis, Appellant s

v.

Travis Central Appraisal District, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS CO UNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KELLY, AND SMITH

REVERSED AND RENDERED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on November 13, 20 18

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in

the court’s judgment . Therefore, the Court reverse s t he district co u rt ’ s judgment and r ender s

judgment dismissing the case for wan t of prosecuti on

. The appell ee shall pay all costs relating to

this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Exhibit 24
 
 Confirming Statement
 
 This statement confirms that the undersigned, Roderick English, has authorized and designated Jennifer Mainord or Rhonda Bost, to execute and file on the undersigned’s behalf, all Forms 3, 4, and 5 (including any amendments thereto) that the undersigned may be required to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a result of the undersigned’s ownership of or transactions in securities of First Merchants Corporation. The authority of Jennifer Mainord or Rhonda Bost under this statement shall continue until the undersigned is no longer required to file Forms 3, 4 and 5 with regard to the undersigned’s ownership of or transactions in securities of First Merchants Corporation, unless
earlier in writing. The undersigned acknowledges Jennifer Mainord or Rhonda Bost are not assuming any of the undersigned’s responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
 Date:  09/10/2012
 
 /s/ Roderick English
 Signature
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             514
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,307
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,437
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,560
<PP&E>                                         115,459
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,107
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,933
<BONDS>                                         18,033
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           215
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,105
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,960
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,338
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,670
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   871
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,974
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,040
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,934
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,934
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14


</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL PATRICK CARROLL,

Appellant,

v.

LINDSEY TRUEX CARROLL,

Appellee.

No. 2D21-837

September 15, 2021

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Wesley D. Tibbals, Judge

Michelle M. Gervais of Blank Rome LLP, Tampa, for Appellant.

Eric R. Maier, Michael L. Lundy, Martin G. Deptula, and J. Carlton 

Mitchell of Older Lundy Alvarez & Koch, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
#### Ex parte GILBERT.

No. 20871.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 17, 1940.

W. W. Ballard, of Wichita Falls, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding in-which the relator is held under the order of the City Health Officer of Wichita Falls pursuant to the provisions- of Art. 4445, Revised Civil Statutes. It is shown that the relator was ordered restrained because-she was believed to be a menace to the public health by virtue of being a prostitute afflicted with syphilis. Relator makes no contention that her restraint is illegal but insists that she should have been accorded a postponement of the hearing in order that she might prepare to show that she was not at the time suffering from syphilis. We think the record clearly shows that the relator knew why she was being restrained. Hence she should have been prepared for the hearing at the time she applied for- the-writ of habeas corpus. At all events, we do not understand that in this proceeding she can question the action of the judge below in declining to postpone the hearing. The proof adduced by the state at the hearing was to the effect that relator was a prostitute and was suffering from syphilis. We quote from Ex parte Hardcastle, 84 Tex.Cr.R. 463, 208 S.W. 531, 2 A.L.R. 1539, as follows:

> “The- Legislature, under the police power, has authority to authorize the establishment of quarantine regulations for the protection of the public against contagion from those persons whose condition is such a-s-to spread disease, and, incident thereto, to authorize the arrest and detention of such persons; and such, we understand, is the purpose of the statute in question. Under its terms, the proper health officer may issue a warrant by virtue of which a lawful arrest may be made without preliminary thereto affording the person affected a hearing; but if, after arrest, such person, challenges the right of the authorities to continue the detention, the fundamental law accords him the right to have the legality of his detention inquired into by a proper court in a habeas corpus proceeding.. The law denies to no one restrained of hiá liberty without a hearing the right to prove in some tribunal that the facts justifying his restraint do not exist. Ruling Case Law, vol. 6, p. 435, § 449. The health authorities causing the arrest of relator de*719rive their power to do so from the alleged existence of the fact that the relator is affected with the disease mentioned, and that her detention is required in the public interest to prevent contagion. If those facts do not exist, the officer has no jurisdiction ‘to continue the restraint and the court in the habeas corpus proceeding has authority to inquire whether the facts essential to jurisdiction exist. Ex parte Degener, 30 Tex. App. 566, 17 S.W. 1111.”

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7089

STEVEN WHEELER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus R. ANGELONE, Director, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-02-1562-AM) Submitted: October 27, 2003 Decided: November 17, 2003 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Wheeler, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Kathleen Beatty Martin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Steven T. Wheeler seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A petitioner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wheeler has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Wheeler’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
SCWC-11-0000463 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

JACK THOMAS, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs. COUNTY OF HAWAI # I; JAY KIMURA; and JEFFERSON R. MALATE;

Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000463; CIV. NO. 07-1-0128) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari filed on February 1, 2013, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, March 14, 2013. Charles J. Ferrera for petitioner Michael J. Udovic for respondents /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000463 14-MAR-2013 01:57 PM
From: Angus Crane [acrane@naima.org]

Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:15 PM

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Cc: Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.go v; Reeves, David

Subject: FW: Owens Corning Aerials

Attachments: Owens Corning Delmar Aerial with Stacks.pdf; Owens Corning Eloy Aerial with

Stacks.pdf; Owens Corning Fairburn Aerial with Stacks.pdf; Owens Corning Kansas City Aerial with

Stacks.pdf; Owen s Corning Mt. Vernon Aerial with Stacks.pdf; Owens Corning Salt Lake City Aerial with

Stacks.pdf; Owens Corning Santa Clara Aerial with Stacks.pdf; Owens Corning Waxahachie Aerial with

Stacks.pdf; Owens Corning Newark Aerial with Stacks

- Pipe.pdf; Owe ns Corning Newark Aerial with

Stacks

- Wool.pdf

Ms. Hancy,

Attached please find the aerial views (10) with furnace and FCC stacks marked along with stack ID’s for

Owens Corning.

Please contact me if you have any questions.

Angus E. Crane

Executive Vice President, General Counsel

North American Insulation Manufacturers Association

Ph: (703) 684

- 0084 ext. 123

Fax: (703) 684

- 0427

Visit NAIMA online at:

www.NAIMA.org

www.PipeInsulation.org

Dear Angus,

Please find attache d the aerial views (10) with furnace and FCC stacks marked along with stack ID’s as

requested.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you for coordination of the responses.

Robin Edmiston

- Bennett

ISB Environmental Network Leader

Fax: 419

- 325

- 9778

Phone: 740

- 328

- 2479

Cell: 740

- 323

- 6664
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2707 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2707

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide educational 
   resources regarding opioid use and pain management as part of the 
                        Medicare & You handbook.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 18, 2018

Mr. Nelson (for himself and Mr. Heller) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide educational 
   resources regarding opioid use and pain management as part of the 
                        Medicare & You handbook.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Informing Seniors about Opioids Act 
of 2018''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION OF INFORMATION REGARDING OPIOID USE AND PAIN 
              MANAGEMENT AS PART OF MEDICARE & YOU HANDBOOK.

    (a) In General.--Section 1804 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395b-2) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) The notice provided under subsection (a) shall include 
educational resources, compiled by the Secretary, regarding opioid use, 
pain management, and alternative pain management treatments.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to notices distributed prior to each Medicare open enrollment 
period beginning after January 1, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I,  Mitchell  Binder, Chief Financial Officer of Orbit International Corp.,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as enacted by  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The  Annual  Report  on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2007  (the "Annual Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with
the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934;  and

     (2)     information  contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations of Orbit
International  Corp.

Dated: March 31, 2008
                                   /s/ Mitchell Binder
                                   -------------------
                                   Mitchell Binder
                                   Chief Financial Officer

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Orbit International Corp. and will
be  retained  by  Orbit  International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,352
<SECURITIES>                                     4,705
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,980
<ALLOWANCES>                                        50
<INVENTORY>                                      6,335
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,656
<PP&E>                                          11,642
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,798
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,897
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,065
<COMMON>                                        54,131
<OTHER-SE>                                     (39,699)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,038
<SALES>                                          9,550
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,550
<CGS>                                           10,421
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,421
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,113
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (22,986)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (22,986)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22,986)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.16)
        

</TABLE>
[Letterhead of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.]


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Oregon Metallurgical Corporation and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File Nos.
333-20909, 333-00167 and 33-63449) of our report dated February 4, 1997, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of Oregon Metallurgical Corporation and subsidiaries as of December
31, 1996 and 1995, and for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994,
which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                                  /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
                                                  COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



Eugene, Oregon
March 19, 1997