alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICEROF ALTERRA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION**This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 of Alterra Healthcare Corporation (the “Issuer”).I, Mark W. Ohlendorf, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:(i)     the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)), as amended; and(ii)     the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respect, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.Dated:   November 14, 2003  /s/ Mark W. Ohlendorf                                 Mark W. OhlendorfPresident, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,858
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,426)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,860
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,398
<PP&E>                                          11,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,043)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,917
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,216
<SALES>                                         16,623
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,201
<CGS>                                            8,998
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,706
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   522
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,476
<INCOME-TAX>                                       517
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       959
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
June 15, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

400 7* Street, SW., Room PL401

Washington, DC 2059 1-000 1

Submitted via FAA Docket 2005-22227

RE: Request for Renewal of Exemption 8636 from 14 CFR Part 121.434(c)(1)(ii)

I am petitioning on behalf of Ameristar Air Cargo, Inc. (Ameristar) for an extension of 

Exemption 8636 (Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2005-22227) beyond its current expiration 

date of September 30, 2015.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) granted exemption 8636 to Ameristar Air 

Cargo, Inc. (Ameristar) on September 15, 2005. This exemption is from 

§121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) and permits 

Ameristar to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman in place of an FAA 

inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) while that PIC is performing 

prescribed duties during at least one flight that includes a takeoff and a landing when 

completing initial or upgrade training as specified in Section 121.424.

Granting an extension to Exemption No. 8636 would be in the public interest for the 

same reasons stated in Ameristar’s original request of exemption (Regulatory Docket 

No. FAA-2005-22227-1). 

Thank you for your time and consideration of this petition for exemption.

Sincerely,

Pat Hulsey

Director of Operations
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                                   <C>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         Year               Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1997        DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1997        JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1997        DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                     39,746              5,226
<SECURITIES>                               18,807             37,838
<RECEIVABLES>                              16,703             13,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                2,492              1,455
<INVENTORY>                                     0                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           74,923             56,405
<PP&E>                                     16,116              9,640
<DEPRECIATION>                              6,848              4,886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             84,939             61,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      12,340             10,645
<BONDS>                                         0                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0                  0
<PREFERRED>                                     0                  0
<COMMON>                                      125                121
<OTHER-SE>                                 72,467             50,149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               84,939             61,959
<SALES>                                    87,906             67,395
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           87,906             67,395
<CGS>                                      48,200             37,828
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              70,817             57,036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            19,755             11,703
<INCOME-TAX>                                3,293              1,008
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        16,462             10,695
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0                  0
<CHANGES>                                       0                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               16,462             10,695
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                1.33               0.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                1.27               0.90


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7352

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH RAY HUNTER,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, 

at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (2:05-cr-00049-JPB-JES-1)

Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 2, 2018

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Ray Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Donald Warner, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Elkins, West Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Ray Hunter appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 

60(b) motion to vacate his underlying criminal judgment, which had already become 

final, based on alleged fraud on the court. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. See United States v. Breit, 754 F.2d 526, 530-31 (4th Cir. 1985) (there is 

no rule similar to Rule 60(b) for criminal judgments and district courts therefore may not 

vacate a judgment in a criminal case that has already become final). Accordingly, we 

affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

| Entity                                   | Jurisdiction of Organization | Name Under Which Subsidiary Does Business                                               |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Alaska United Fiber System Partnership   | Alaska                       | Alaska United Fiber System Partnership, Alaska United Fiber System, Alaska United  |
| GCI Communication Corp.                  | Alaska                       | GCI, GCC, GCICC, GCI Communication Corp.                                           |
| GCI Cable, Inc.                          | Alaska                       | GCI Cable, GCI Cable, Inc.                                                         |
| GCI Holdings, Inc.                       | Alaska                       | GCI Holdings, Inc.                                                                 |
| Potter View Development Co., Inc.        | Alaska                       | Potter View Development Co., Inc.                                                  |
| GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc.  | Alaska                       | GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc., GFCC,  Kanas                         |
| Cycle30, Inc.                       | Alaska                       | Cycle30, Inc., Cycle30                                                                  |
| Unicom, Inc.                        | Alaska                       | Unicom, Inc., Unicom                                                                    |
| United-KUC, Inc.                    | Alaska                       | United-KUC, Inc., United-KUC, KUC                                                       |
| United Utilities, Inc.              | Alaska                       | United Utilities, Inc. United Utilities, UUI                                            |
| United2, LLC                             | Alaska                       | United2, LLC, United2                                                                   |

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7392
GERALD GARNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STEVE DUNBAR; JIM ROBERT; JULIE ARMSTRONG, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Bristow Marchant, Magistrate Judge. (CA-96-2370) Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 3, 1997 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gerald Garner, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissingwithout prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. The district court's dismissal wit hout prejudice is not appealable at this time, given the fact that Appellant could save his complaint through amendment. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers' Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We deny Appellant's request for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Special                               ( print page 73425)                            Emphasis Panel; Development of Automated Cell Culture Flask Cleaning Instrument.                    

*Date:*                         October 22, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rahat (Rani) Khan, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Suite 1E504, Rockville, MD 20892, (301) 594-7319,                         *khanr2@csr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, B—Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 4, 2024.

David W. Freeman,

Supervisory Program Analyst,Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-20372 Filed 9-9-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137041 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 137041 

 COA: 274236 

Berrien CC: 05-406865-FC 

DOMACO SIMS, 05-406866-FC 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 17, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                               EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                 THREE MONTHS     THREE MONTHS     NINE MONTHS      NINE MONTHS
                                                    ENDED            ENDED            ENDED            ENDED
                                                SEPTEMBER 30,    SEPTEMBER 30,    SEPTEMBER 30,    SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                     1996             1997             1996             1997
                                                --------------   --------------   --------------   --------------
<S>                                             <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
 
Weighted average shares outstanding..........       2,141,250        8,454,690        2,141,250        8,453,023
 
Incremental effect of issuance                     
  of Convertible Preferred Stock
  within one year prior to an
  initial public offering at a price
  below the offering price
  (i.e. cheap stock).........................         937,500             ----          937,500             ----
 
Incremental effect of issuance of                   
  warrants and options within one                  
  year prior to an initial public offering
  with an exercise price below the
  offering price (i.e. cheap stock) based
  on the treasury stock method using
  the offering price.........................       1,745,769             ----        1,745,769             ----
                                                   ----------      -----------      -----------      -----------
 
                                                    4,824,519        8,454,690        4,824,519        8,453,023
                                                   ==========      ===========      ===========      ===========
 
Net loss attributable to common stock........      $ (590,697)     $(3,195,129)     $(2,297,698)     $(3,795,413)
                                                   ==========      ===========      ===========      ===========
 
Net loss per share...........................      $    (0.12)     $     (0.38)     $     (0.48)     $     (0.45)
                                                   ==========      ===========      ===========      ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements for the twelve month period ended December 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000075053
<NAME>                        D-lanz Development Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     $
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) pertaining to the 1981 Stock Option Plan, the 1993 Stock Option Plan, the
1997 Equity Incentive Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Warrants to
purchase common stock, and the Options to purchase common stock of Laser Power
Corporation of our report dated December 4, 1998, except for Note 3, as to which
the date is December 23, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Laser Power Corporation included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.



                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Diego, California
December 28, 1998
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 24 

To expand eligibility for hospital care and medical services under section 

101 of the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 

to include veterans who are age 75 or older, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2017 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To expand eligibility for hospital care and medical services 

under section 101 of the Veterans Access, Choice, and 

Accountability Act of 2014 to include veterans who are 

age 75 or older, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY UNDER VETERANS 

4 CHOICE PROGRAM TO INCLUDE VETERANS 

5 AGE 75 OR OLDER. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b)(2) of section 101 

7 of the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 24 IS

1 2014 (Public Law 113–146; 38 U.S.C. 1701 note) is 

2 amended— 

3 (1) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by striking ‘‘; or’’ 

4 and inserting a semicolon; 

5 (2) in subparagraph (D)(ii)(II)(dd), by striking 

6 the period at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

7 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub8 paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(E) is age 75 or older.’’. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

11 (1) INFORMATION ON AVAILABILITY OF

12 CARE.—Subsection (g)(3) of such section is amended 

13 by striking ‘‘or (D)’’ and inserting ‘‘(D), or (E)’’. 

14 (2) REPORT.—Subsection (q)(2)(A) of such sec15 tion is amended— 

16 (A) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and 

17 inserting a semicolon; 

18 (B) in clause (iv), by striking the period at 

19 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

20 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

21 clause: 

22 ‘‘(v) eligible veterans described in sub23 section (b)(2)(E).’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS