alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21348]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 10, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 320 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-655, CP2024-664.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21348 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50306

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRANCISCO ZAMARRON-MARTINEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-2551-ALL

Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Francisco Zamarron-Martinez (Zamarron) pleaded guilty to the charge of

entering the United States illegally after having been deported previously.

Because Zamarron had been convicted previously of a crime of violence,

Zamarron’s offense level was adjusted upward by 16 levels pursuant to U.S.S.G.

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). Zamarron requested a variance from the guidelines sentence.

The request was denied, and Zamarron was sentenced in the middle of the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 10, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-50306

2

guidelines imprisonment range to a 79-month term of imprisonment and to a

three-year period of supervised release. 

Zamarron contends that his sentence of imprisonment was greater than

necessary to accomplish the goals of sentencing listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2).

Zamarron concedes that this court ordinarily applies a presumption of

reasonableness to within-guideline sentences. See United States v. CamposMaldonado, 531 F.3d 337, 338 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 328 (2008);

United States v. Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 554, 565-66 (5th Cir. 2008). Citing

Kimbrough v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 558, 574-75 (2007), he contends that the

presumption should not apply in this case because § 2L1.2 is not empirically

supported. Zamarron points out that the instant offense did not involve violent

conduct and did not pose a danger to others. He contends that the offense was

notinherently evil and “was, at bottom, an internationaltrespass.” He contends

also that the guidelines range did not account for his benign motivation for

reentering the United States—to be with his sick mother.

We decline to reconsider the application of the presumption in light of the

undeveloped record. Zamarron’s reliance upon Kimbrough to challenge the

appellate presumption is misplaced, and he has failed to show that the

presumption should not be applied. The district court considered Zamarron’s

request for leniency in light of his personal circumstances, but it ultimately

determined that a sentence within the guidelines range was appropriate.

Zamarron’s within-guidelines sentence is entitled to a rebuttable presumption

of reasonableness. See Campos-Maldonado, 531 F.3d at 338; Gomez-Herrera,

523 F.3d at 565-66. Because Zamarron has failed to make a showing sufficient

to rebut that presumption, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995             DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995             JAN-02-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995             DEC-31-1994
<CASH>                                              39                      59
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,624                  21,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                       734                     385
<INVENTORY>                                     40,897                  43,160
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,378                   5,618
<PP&E>                                          13,942                  11,983
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,005                   7,486
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,363                  75,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,388                  27,961
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            32                      32
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,824                  23,277
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,363                  75,477
<SALES>                                        289,062                 271,799
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               289,062                 271,799
<CGS>                                          247,556                 232,795
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  247,556                 232,795
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,410                  31,553
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,609                   2,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,487                   5,409
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,168                   1,896
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,319                   3,513
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,319                   3,513
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.80                    1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.80                    1.21
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AdvancePCS (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I David D. Halbert, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ David D. Halbert

David D. Halbert
Chief Executive Officer
February 13, 2003
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2686 

To require Federal agencies to issue appropriate identification for the carrying 

of concealed firearms by qualified law enforcement officers and qualified 

retired law enforcement officers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 17, 2018 

Mr. PERDUE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require Federal agencies to issue appropriate identification for the carrying of concealed firearms by qualified 

law enforcement officers and qualified retired law enforcement officers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Support Experienced 

5 Law Enforcement Countering Terrorism Act of 2018’’ or 

6 the ‘‘SELECT Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2686 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES TO ISSUE 

2 IDENTIFICATION. 

3 Chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, is amend4 ed— 

5 (1) in section 926B, by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(g) An agency upon request by a qualified law en8 forcement officer who is employed by the agency, shall 

9 issue identification described in subsection (d) to the 

10 qualified law enforcement officer.’’; and 

11 (2) in section 926C, by adding at the end the 

12 following: 

13 ‘‘(f) An agency from which a qualified retired law en14 forcement officer separated shall, upon request by the 

15 qualified retired law enforcement officer, issue identifica16 tion described in subsection (d) to the qualified retired law 

17 enforcement officer.’’. 

18 SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

19 It is the sense of Congress that State and local agen20 cies should issue appropriate identification to qualified law 

21 enforcement officers and qualified retired law enforcement 

22 officers in order for such officers to carry concealed fire23 arms in accordance with sections 926B and 926C of title 

24 18, United States Code. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
Pacific Enterprises (the "Company") certifies that:

(i)	the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



February 23, 2005
                                           /S/ STEPHEN L. BAUM
                                         ______________________
                                           Stephen L. Baum
                                           Chief Executive Officer
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2277 

To require the delisting of Mexican gray wolves under the Endangered Species 

Act of 1973 on a determination that the subspecies has been sufficiently 

recovered in the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2018 

Mr. FLAKE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To require the delisting of Mexican gray wolves under the 

Endangered Species Act of 1973 on a determination 

that the subspecies has been sufficiently recovered in 

the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DELISTING OF MEXICAN GRAY WOLVES. 

4 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

5 (1) DIRECTOR.—The term ‘‘Director’’ means 

6 the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife 

7 Service. 

8 (2) MEXICAN GRAY WOLF.— 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2277 IS

1 (A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘Mexican 

2 gray wolf’’ means the subspecies Mexican gray 

3 wolf (Canis lupus baileyi) of the species gray 

4 wolf (Canis lupus). 

5 (B) INCLUSION.—The term ‘‘Mexican gray 

6 wolf’’ includes any subspecies, distinct popu7 lation segment, or experimental population of 

8 the species gray wolf (Canis lupus) that the Di9 rector determines after the date of enactment of 

10 this Act will take the place of, or correspond 

11 with, the subspecies designated as Mexican gray 

12 wolf (Canis lupus baileyi) on that date of enact13 ment. 

14 (b) REQUIREMENT.—Notwithstanding any other pro15 vision of law (including regulations), effective beginning 

16 on the date on which the Director makes a positive deter17 mination under subsection (c)— 

18 (1) the Mexican gray wolf shall no longer be in19 cluded on any list of endangered species, threatened 

20 species, or experimental populations under the En21 dangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 

22 seq.); and 

23 (2) management of the Mexican gray wolf shall 

24 be assumed by each State in which the Mexican gray 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2277 IS

1 wolf is present, effective beginning on the date of the 

2 determination. 

3 (c) DETERMINATION BY DIRECTOR.— 

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after 

5 the date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall 

6 determine whether a population of not fewer than 

7 100 Mexican gray wolves in a 5,000-square-mile 

8 area within the historic range of the Mexican gray 

9 wolf has been established, as described in the Mexi10 can Wolf Recovery Plan of 1982 prepared by the 

11 Mexican Wolf Recovery Team (U.S. Fish and Wild12 life Service. 1982. Mexican Wolf Recovery Plan. 

13 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New 

14 Mexico. 103 pp.). 

15 (2) STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES.—A deter16 mination under paragraph (1) shall be made in ac17 cordance with applicable standards and procedures 

18 used by the Director in determining the status of a 

19 species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 

20 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Initial Review Group; Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases B Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         October 23-25, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Charlene J. Repique, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Rm 7347, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 451-3638,                         *charlene.repique@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 15, 2024.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-21415 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21372]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 335 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-678, CP2024-687.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21372 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 23 - Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 333-
25979) pertaining to the Orbit International Corporation 1995 Employee Stock 
Option Plan and 
the Orbit International Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee 
Directors of our 
report dated March 5, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial 
statements and schedule of 
Orbit International Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the 
year ended December 31, 1998.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 31, 1999
EXHIBIT 23






INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No. 2-65348 on Forms S-8 and S-16 relating to the Orion Capital
Corporation 1976 and 1979 Stock Option Plans,  No. 2-80636 on Form S-8
relating to the Orion Capital Corporation 1982 Long-Term Performance
Incentive Plan, No. 2-63344 on Form S-8 relating to the Orion Capital
Corporation Employees' Stock Savings and Retirement Plan and No. 33-59847
on Form S-8 of our report dated February 21, 1996, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Orion Capital Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 1995.


Deloitte & Touche LLP


Hartford, Connecticut
March 15, 1996






INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Orion Capital Corporation for the year ended December 31,
1995 of our reports dated February 20, 1996, appearing in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Guaranty National Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1995.


Deloitte & Touche LLP


Denver, Colorado
March 15, 1996
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1995, and the Consolidated
Statement of Income for the twelve months ended December 31, 1995, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      439,850
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     77,182
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          78,774
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        13,390
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 609,196
<COMMON>                                        55,901
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       30,335
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             98,006
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 184,242
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           18,000
<PREFERRED>                                     20,831
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           168,261
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   13,733
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 204,129
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  609,196
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      328,641
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            16,584
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     268,850
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     285,434
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         43,207
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 813
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  44,020
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        15,075
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,945
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,358
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   26,587
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        19,677
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       14,558
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          58,077
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.38
#### AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE, INC., petitioner, v. Richard W. PASCHEN, et ux.

No. 02-562.

Dec. 16, 2002.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.