alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's financial statements included in the Company's Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                               42,043
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       536,845
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                       2,026,588
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,612,936
<PP&E>                              924,989
<DEPRECIATION>                      872,936
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    2,664,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             2,708,032
<BONDS>                           1,235,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                            969,994
<OTHER-SE>                      (2,248,637)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      2,664,989
<SALES>                           3,392,171
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    334,582
<CGS>                             3,057,589
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     3,743,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  155,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (351,270)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (351,270)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                      (351,270)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (0.20)
        


</TABLE>
SCAP-19-0000372

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF HONOLULU and COMMON CAUSE,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAIʻI,

Defendant-Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CAAP-19-0000372; CIVIL NO. 18-1-1376-09)

ORDER OF CORRECTION

(By: Nakayama, J.)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court,

filed on November 4, 2021, is corrected as follows:

On page 66, the attorney credits are corrected to

include Thomas Yamachika for amicus curiae Tax Foundation of

Hawaiʻi, as follows: 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCAP-19-0000372

04-NOV-2021

02:35 PM

Dkt. 59 OCOR
Robert Brian Black

(Lisa Emily Engebretsen

with him on the briefs)

for plaintiffs-appellants

League of Women Voters

of Honolulu and Common Cause

Clare E. Connors

(Kimberly Tsumoto Guidry on the

briefs) for defendant-appellee

State of Hawaiʻi

Thomas Yamachika for amicus curiae

Tax Foundation of Hawaiʻi

Colleen Hanabusa for amicus

curiae Hawaiʻi State Legislature

Robert H. Thomas for amicus

curiae Grassroot Institute of

Hawaii

The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all

necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of this change.

 DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, November 4, 2021.

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

Associate Justice

2
<PAGE>






                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19



January 26, 2006





President
BISYS, Inc.
90 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10016

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is made to that certain Software License Agreement effective as of
September 1, 2003 by and between Open Solutions Inc. ("OSI") and BISYS, Inc.
("BISYS"), as amended (the "Agreement") and to the letter dated October 10, 2005
from OSI to BISYS. OSI and BISYS hereby further agree as follows:

1.      Any defined terms used in this letter shall have the meaning ascribed to
such defined term in the Agreement.

2.       The date by which BISYS is entitled to terminate the limited
non-compete obligations of OSI for a region pursuant to Section 4(b) of the
Agreement, and thereby automatically terminate OSI's Most Favored Customer
obligations and BISYS' Minimum Fee Payment obligations for such region (subject
to the 9 month continuation provision of Section 4(b)(4)), among other things,
is hereby extended one additional month from January 31, 2006 to February 28,
2006 ("Extension Period"), subject to the following:

         o        BISYS shall continue to pay Minimum Fee Payments to OSI during
                  the Extension Period in accordance with the Agreement; and

         o        If BISYS elects to terminate the limited non-compete
                  obligations of OSI for a region on or before February 28,
                  2006, such election shall be deemed to have been made on
                  October 10, 2005 so that the delayed election shall not cause
                  BISYS to pay more in Minimum Fee Payments with respect to such
                  region than it would have been required to pay if such
                  election had been duly made on October 10, 2005.

3.       This letter agreement shall constitute an amendment of the Agreement in
accordance with the terms and conditions thereof. In all other regards the
Agreement shall remain and continue in full force and effect as amended through
the date hereof.




<PAGE>

BISYS, Inc.
January 26, 2006
Page -2-



Please acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing by countersigning this letter
agreement in the place provided below and returning it to the undersigned,
whereupon this letter agreement shall become effective as of the date first
above written.

Very truly yours,

OPEN SOLUTIONS INC.


By: /s/ Kenneth J. Saunders
    -----------------------------------------
    Name: Kenneth J. Saunders
    Title: Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer



ACCEPTED AND AGREED AS OF THE DATE FIRST WRITTEN ABOVE:

BISYS, INC.


By: /s/ Bruce D. Dalziel
    -----------------------------------------
    Name: Bruce D. Dalziel
    Title: EVP + CFO
Exhibit 10.5


 


AMENDMENT OF
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS IS AN AMENDMENT OF EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), dated as of October 13, 2004,
by and between B&G FOODS, INC. (hereinafter “Corporation”), and Robert C.
Cantwell (hereinafter “Cantwell”), amending the Employment Agreement by and
between the Corporation and Cantwell (the “Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS, the
Corporation and Cantwell previously entered into the Agreement, to be effective
as of the date of the close of the Offering (as defined below), if the Offering
closed prior to June 30, 2004; and


 


WHEREAS, the Offering did not close prior to June 30 2004 and
will instead close on October 14, 2004; and


 


WHEREAS, Cantwell
and the Corporation desire to amend Section 1 of the Agreement to provide that
the Agreement shall be effective as of October 14, 2004.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the material advantages accruing to the two parties and the
mutual covenants contained herein and in the Agreement, the Corporation and
Cantwell agree with each other as follows:


 


1.             Section 1 of the
Agreement as it currently reads is no longer effective and is void ab initio.


 


2.             Section 1 of the
Agreement is hereby replaced with the following provision:


 


“1.           EFFECTIVE DATE. 
For purposes of this Agreement, the ‘Effective Date’ shall mean October
14, 2004, the date of the closing of the Corporation’s initial public offering
of the ‘Enhanced Income Securities’ as described in the final prospectus to be
filed with the Securities Exchange Commission by the Corporation (the
‘Offering’).”


 






















 


3.             This Amendment may be
executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and
all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


IN  WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Corporation and Cantwell have executed this Amendment as of the
day and year first above written.


 


 


	
   

  	
  B&G FOODS, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ David L. Wenner

  
	
   

  	
  Name: David L. Wenner

  
	
   

  	
  Title: President

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Robert C. Cantwell

  
	
   

  	
  Robert C. Cantwell

  



 


2
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE02072

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
#### WALKER v. STATE.

No. 20203.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 1, 1939.

Mead & Metcalfe, of Marfa, for appellant.

Lloyd" W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is driving an automobile on a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $75 and confinement in jail for five days.

In the indictment it is alleged that appellant, while intoxicated, drove an automobile upon a public / highway in the County of Brewster and State of Texas, “to-wit,: U. S. highway 90, * * 3⁄8.” The only proof offered in support of the averment as to the highway upon which the appellant operated the car came from the arresting officer. We quote: “Yes, sir, that is a state highway. It is highway ninety and it was in Alpine, Brewster County, Texas.” Unless we can assume that state highway 90 and U. S. highway 90 are one and the same road (and we know of no authority which authorizes this court to indulge in such presumption against one accused of crime), appellant’s^ contention that the state failed to prove a driving on the highway as described in the indictment must be sustained. Spencer v. State, 118 Tex.Cr.R. 336, 42 S.W.2d 259. It is observed that in his motion for new trial appellant raised the question now under consideration. It is well settled that-it was incumbent upon the state to prove that the car was driven upon the highway described in the indictment. The opinion is expressed that on the point mentioned the averment and proof fail to correspond.

Upon another trial the court should refrain from instructing the jury as to the law relative to the suspension of drivers’ licenses. Under the statute, a conviction automatically works a suspension.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                          $         0
<SECURITIES>                            136
<RECEIVABLES>                         7,859
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        7,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   136
<BONDS>                               7,859
<COMMON>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          7,995
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                              0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
       
<S>                             <C>               <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS            9-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1995       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1995       JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1995       SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                              936,771        10,581,476
<SECURITIES>                              0                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                    59,595,401        99,417,716
<ALLOWANCES>                      3,771,413        10,047,849            
<INVENTORY>                               0                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 59,091,410       107,471,870
<PP&E>                           31,005,198        44,309,741
<DEPRECIATION>                    3,478,485         8,376,376
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   87,123,970       188,531,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            30,730,420        51,550,160
<BONDS>                                   0                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0                 0             
<PREFERRED>                               0                 0              
<COMMON>                            896,079       108,710,405
<OTHER-SE>                                0                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     87,123,970       188,531,291
<SALES>                         215,375,486       309,774,224
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                215,375,486       309,774,224
<CGS>                           133,727,834       183,260,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   133,727,834       183,260,490               
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 60,399,173        97,419,731
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                2,951,975         3,340,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  19,342,442        25,555,407
<INCOME-TAX>                      7,531,592        10,923,323
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0                 0      
<DISCONTINUED>                            0                 0     
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0                 0   
<CHANGES>                                 0                 0     
<NET-INCOME>                     10,764,912        14,632,084
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        161.91               .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0                 0
        

</TABLE>
December 1, 2016

Mr. Austin Hilgenberg

1695 Hunter Drive

Wayzata, MN 55391

Re: FAA-2015-8663

Dear Mr. Hilgenberg:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov.

Sincerely,

/s/

Dan Ngo

Program Analyst
Exhibit 21.1

<TABLE>
                                                   SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<CAPTION>
                                                     Jurisdiction of
                     Entity                            Organization           Name Under Which Subsidiary Does Business
--------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ----------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                      <C>            <C>
Alaska United Fiber System Partnership                    Alaska        Alaska United Fiber System Partnership, Alaska
                                                                        United Fiber System, Alaska United

Fiber Hold Co., Inc.                                      Alaska        Fiber Hold Co., Inc., Fiber Hold Company

GCI Communication Corp.                                   Alaska        GCI, GCC, GCICC, GCI Communication Corp.

GCI Cable, Inc.                                           Alaska        GCI Cable, GCI Cable, Inc.

GCI Fiber Co., Inc.                                       Alaska        GCI Fiber Co., Inc., GCI Fiber Company

GCI Holdings, Inc.                                        Alaska        GCI Holdings, Inc.

GCI Satellite Co., Inc.                                   Alaska        GCI Satellite Co., Inc., GCI Satellite Company

GCI Transport Co., Inc.                                   Alaska        GCI Transport Co., Inc., GCI Transport Company

Potter View Development Co., Inc.                         Alaska        Potter View Development Co., Inc.

GCI Cablesystems of Alaska, Inc.                          Alaska        GCI Cablesystems of Alaska, Inc., Rogers Cable

GCI American Cablesystems, Inc.                          Delaware       GCI American Cablesystems, Inc.

GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc.                        Alaska        GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc., GFCC,  Kanas
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



        We have issued our report dated March 9, 1998, accompanying the 
consolidated financial statements of Oshman's Sporting Goods, Inc. and 
Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended 
January 31, 1998. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said 
report in the Registration Statements of Oshman's Sporting Goods, Inc. on Form 
S-8, File No. 33-14665, File No. 33-41404, File No. 33-28357, File No. 33-53451,
File No. 33-54221 and File No. 33-64515.



GRANT THORNTON LLP


Houston, Texas
April 30, 1998
**EXHIBIT 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.333-116206,333-90952 and 333-11145 on Form S-3 and 333-25261, 333-73041 and 333-73075 on Form S-8 of ourreport dated February 20, 2006 (which expresses an unqualified opinion) relating to theconsolidated financial statements of Otter Tail Corporation and its subsidiaries (theCompany) and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting (which includes an explanatory paragraph that an acquisition completed in August2004 was included in the assessment of internal control over financial reporting for 2005 andindicates a change in internal controls for 2005 related to processes surrounding changesmade within the MISO market) appearing in the 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders of theCompany and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company forthe year ended December 31, 2005. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP Minneapolis, MinnesotaMarch 14, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6969

DONNIEL WOODS, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (9:08-cv-03767-TLW)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donniel Woods, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Donniel Woods appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted, and denying reconsideration of that order. On appeal, we confine our review

to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. Rule 34(b). Woods’ brief fails to challenge the district court’s dispositive conclusion that his complaint failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted. In addition, Woods alleges no error committed by the district court in denying reconsideration of that order. Accordingly, we affirm the orders of the district court, and deny Woods’ motions for discovery. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                  EXHIBIT 10.16



                               GABT Developments
                             600 Industrial Drive
                                Fort Erie, Ont
                                    L2A 5M9
                                  Feb 6 1997



Riddell/All American
1320 Taylor Street
Elyria, Ohio
44035
Attn: Mr. W. Logan
Vice President Finance

Dear Sir,
     It is our present intention to continue the lease for the location at 600
Industrial Drive, Fort Erie, Ontario at the present rate of $1,770.83 per
month  for the remainder of the year ending in September 30 1997. Prior to
that time we will renegotiate a new lease at a rate and time span to be
determined. Could you please sign where indicated to indicate your acceptance
and return a copy to my attention.



Accepted  A. GRUNDY                     Accepted  W.D. LOGAN
          ----------------                        ----------------
          A. Grundy                               W.D. Logan
          GABT Developments                       Riddell/All American
Dated     6 Feb 97                      Dated     2/10/97
          ---------------                         -----------------
EXHIBIT 32.1**CERTIFICATION***Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode, V. Igor Gonda, Chief Executive Officer of Aradigm Corporation (the “Company”), and Thomas C.Chesterman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Quarterly Report andresults of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Quarterly Report.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 14th day of November2006.     /s/ Igor Gonda   /s/ Thomas C. Chesterman     President and Chief Executive Officer   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     Dated: November 14, 2006   Dated: November 14, 2006 * This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofAradigm Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.