alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|     |                                                                                                                                        |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                                  |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ACCO Brands Corporation. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| By:    | /s/ Boris Elisman |
|   | Boris Elisman |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001013149
<NAME> ICT GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                       1
<CASH>                                          13,491                  14,199
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,319                  25,083
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,797                  42,251
<PP&E>                                          53,210                  45,781
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,790                  17,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,133                  75,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,592                  16,529
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           118                     116
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,038                  44,772
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,133                  75,751
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,271                  85,582
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,586                  50,004
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,513                  32,954
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 666                     204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,506                   2,420
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,147                     943
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,359                   1,477
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,359                   1,477
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.29                    0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28                    0.12



</TABLE>
#### BERTHRONG v. STATE.

No. 20139.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 1, 1939.

Chas. Owen, of El Paso, .for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Aus tin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was indicted for robbery, and under Art. 62, P.C., a repetition of offenses was alleged. Under the verdict of the jury he received a -life imprisonment sentence.

In Walthall v. State, 109 Tex.Cr.R. 26, *2*S.W.2d 442, we held [page 443]: “It was imperative that the state prove, not only that the appellant committed the burglary alleged to have been committed on October 4, 1926, in Nueces county, but that it establish the identity of the appellant as the person convicted under the other indictments in evidence.” To the same effect is the case of Huston v. State, 126 Tex.Cr.R. 355, 71 S.W.2d 876.

The testimony in this "case merely shows that a person named Edson Berthong was charged and convicted in Suffolk County, Massachusetts, of larceny of an auto on August 3, 1932; that he was placed on probation, and thereafterwards he was placed in the penitentiary because of a violation of such probation. There is no further testimony relative to the identity of the Massachusetts Edson Berthong, and naught to show that he is the same person as the one charged herein. This is imperative in order to sustain the sentence herein to a life imprisonment.

Because of the insufficiency of the proof to sustain the life imprisonment sentence, this judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      THIS  AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT  AGREEMENT  ("Agreement")  is made as of the
10th day of May, 2000 by and between ICG Communications, Inc. ("Employer" or the
"Company") and James Washington ("Employee").

                                    RECITALS

      WHEREAS,  the Company and  Employee  previously  entered into that certain
Employment Agreement dated as of January 7, 2000 ("Employment Agreement");

      WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend certain of the terms of the
Employment Agreement;

      NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
contained herein, the parties agree as follows:

1.   Section 5.3.  Section 5.3 is hereby  amended to add a penultimate  sentence
     which shall read as follows:  "At the time of the occurrence of a Change of
     Control  all  options  to  purchase  shares of the  Company  that have been
     granted to Employee  pursuant to the  Company's  Stock  Option Plans and/or
     award  agreements,  but not yet vested,  will immediately vest and Employee
     shall be entitled to exercise such options in accordance with the plans and
     agreements relating to such options,  provided,  however,  that the options
     granted under the Share Price  Appreciation  Vesting  Non-Qualified  Option
     Agreement  dated as of January 7, 2000  between  Employee  and the  Company
     shall not vest on an  accelerated  basis upon the occurrence of a Change of
     Control  of the  Company  except  as  expressly  set  forth in that  option
     agreement."

2.   Other  Terms  and  Conditions.  All  other  terms  and  conditions  of  the
     Employment  Agreement  shall  remain in full force and effect,  as if fully
     stated herein.

3.   Capitalized  Terms.  Capitalized  and  defined  terms  shall  have the same
     meaning  as that  accorded  them in the  Employment  Agreement,  unless the
     context requires otherwise.

4.   Conflict.  If there are any  conflicting  terms or  conditions  between the
     terms and  conditions of this Amendment and the terms and conditions of the
     Employment  Agreement,  the terms and  conditions  of the  Amendment  shall
     control.

<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  each of the parties  hereto has duly  executed  this
Amendment as of the date first written above.

                                    ICG COMMUNICATIONS, INC.



                                           --------------------------
                                    Name:   /s/ William S. Beans, Jr.
                                           --------------------------
                                    Title: President & COO
                                           --------------------------



                                           /s/ James Washington

                                           --------------------------
                                           James Washington
Exhibit 21.1

<TABLE>
                                            SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<CAPTION>

                 Jurisdiction of
                     Entity                            Organization           Name Under Which Subsidiary Does Business
--------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ----------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                       <C>           <C>
Alaska United Fiber System Partnership                    Alaska        Alaska United Fiber System Partnership, Alaska
                                                                        United Fiber System, Alaska United

GCI Communication Corp.                                   Alaska        GCI, GCC, GCICC, GCI Communication Corp.

GCI Cable, Inc.                                           Alaska        GCI Cable, GCI Cable, Inc.

GCI Holdings, Inc.                                        Alaska        GCI Holdings, Inc.

Potter View Development Co., Inc.                         Alaska        Potter View Development Co., Inc.

GCI Cablesystems of Alaska, Inc.                          Alaska        GCI Cablesystems of Alaska, Inc., Rogers Cable

GCI American Cablesystems, Inc.                           Delaware      GCI American Cablesystems, Inc.

GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc.                        Alaska        GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc., GFCC,  Kanas

WOK 1, Inc.                                               Alaska        WOK 1

WOK 2, Inc.                                               Alaska        WOK 2
</TABLE>
#### GOURLEY v. EASTMAN.

No. 9283.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

March 7, 1934.

Rehearing Denied April 11, 1934.

*306S. L. Gill and John W. Hill, both of Ray-mondville, for appellant.

A. B. Crane, of Raymondvillev for ap-pellee.

SMITH, Justice.

Three simple questions are raised in this appeal. The case was tried by the court, without a jury. There is no statement of facts, nor findings of fact by the trial judge.

Appellant’s first complaint is that the trial judge .permitted appellee to file an amended petition after the parties announced ready. There is nothing in the record to show the circumstances of the filing of that pleading, but it does appear that it was filed on May 3, 1933, that appellant filed an answer on the same day, directed to said amended petition, and judgment was likewise rendered on that day. There are several reasons why appellant’s complaint is without merit.

In the first place, since the record shows that the amended petition was filed on the day of announcement by the parties, it will be presumed, if such presumption be necessary to support the judgment, that it was filed before- the announcements were made.

In the second’ place, the matter was one for the determination of the trial judge in his discretion, which does not appear to have been abused in this case.

And, finally, as appellant’s amended answer is addressed directly to the amended petition, the alleged tardy filing of the latter resulted in no injury to appellant, whose first assignment of error is accordingly overruled.

It is next urged that the judgment be reversed because the trial judge failed to file written findings of fact and conclusions of law, notwithstanding appellant’s timely request therefor. This contention, presented in appellant’s second assignment of error, must be overruled in the absence of any showing that appellant pursued the procedure prescribed by statute as a condition to an appellant’s right to "complain of the failure” of the judge to prepare or file his findings and conclusions. Article 2247, R. S. 1925, as amended by the Acts of 1931 (42d Leg.) p. 118, c. 76, § 1 (Vernon’s Ann. Oiv. St. art. 2247).

The sufficiency of appellant’s third assignment of error depends entirely upon the nature and effect of the evidence adduced upon the trial. Wherefore, in the absence of a statement of facts, the questions presented in that assignment cannot be reviewed.

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1470 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1470

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 
 deduction for the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals 
             be allowed in determining self-employment tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2009

   Mr. Kind (for himself, Mr. Herger, Ms. Kosmas, and Mr. Reichert) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 
 deduction for the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals 
             be allowed in determining self-employment tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equity for Our Nation's Self-
Employed Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. SECA TAX DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (l) of section 162 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rules for health insurance 
costs of self-employed individuals) is amended by striking paragraph 
(4) and by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (4).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                           ASPECT DEVELOPMENT, INC.
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
               (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA; UNAUDITED)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                    Three months ended             Nine months ended
                                                        September 30,                September 30,
                                                   -----------------------------------------------------
                                                      1996         1995             1996         1995
                                                   ----------   ---------        ----------  -----------
<S>                                                  <C>          <C>               <C>          <C> 
Common Stock:                                      
  Weighted average common stock                    
  outstanding during the period                        11,791       5,181             9,174        5,074
                                                   
Common Stock Equivalents:                          
  Net effect of dilutive options and warrants      
  based upon treasury stock method                      1,970       1,311             1,663        1,287
                                                   
Convertible preferred stock                                --       3,687             1,229        3,687
                                                   
Stock related to SAB No. 64 and 83                         --         822               274          822
                                                  -----------     -------         ---------    ---------
Shares used in per share computations                  13,761      11,001            12,340       10,870
                                                  ===========     =======         =========    =========
                                                   
Net income                                        $     1,020     $   147         $   1,572    $     358
                                                  ===========     =======         =========    =========
                                                   
Net income per share                              $      0.07     $  0.01         $    0.13    $    0.03
                                                  ===========     =======         =========    =========
</TABLE> 

                                      19
#### FISHER v. RAILROAD COMMISSION et al.

No. 8942.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

March 13, 1940.

Rehearing Denied April 10, 1940.

A. M. Felts, of Austin, for appellant.

Gerald C. Mann, Atty. Gen., and Glenn R. Lewis and Geo, W. Barcus, Asst. Attys. Gen, for appellees.

McClendon, chief justice.

Fisher brought suit against the Railroad Commission, its members, and other state officials and employees, to enjoin interference with his operation of a fleet of ten trucks over the highways of Texas, “in the transportation of merchandise for hire exclusively in interstate commerce by motor vehicle.” The defendants admitted the issuance to Fisher by the Commission of a common carrier certificate, authorizing the use of certain state highways (noted below) ; but alleged that Fisher was exceeding his schedule allowance under his certificate and was also operating over other highways than those therein authorized. Defendants thereupon sought to enjoin Fisher from operating in the named respects in excess of his certificate authorization. In *830a trial to the court without a jury, Fisher was denied the injunctive relief he sought, and was perpetually enjoined from operating over Highways 2 and 6 south of Dallas; subject, however, to his right to apply to the Commission for a certificate authorizing operation over said portions of said highways.

The facts are without dispute. The only authority which Fisher had from the Commission to operate over Texas highways was under certificate No. 2787, originally issued March 20, 1936. The highways over which he was authorized to operate were thus designated in the certificate; “State Highway No. 3 from San Antonio to Van Horn, and from Van Horn West to the Texas-New Mexico State Line; and from San Antonio North over any highway or route lying entirely West of State Highways No. 2 and 6 and all portions thereof, and over either State Highways Nos. 6, 40 and 10' lying North of Fort Worth and Dallas to the State Line.”

Fisher urges two contentions in this •court:

1. Under the “grandfather” clause •of the Federal Motor Carrier Act 1935, 49 U.S.C. § 306, 49 U.S.C.A. § 306, he was not required to obtain a certificate or other authorization from the Texas Commission in order to operate over the Texas highways in exclusively interstate commerce. This question has been determined adversely to appellant’s contention in McDonald v. Thompson, 305 U.S. 263, 59 S.Ct. 176, 83 L.Ed. 164; Winton v. Thompson, Tex.Civ.App., 123 S.W.2d 951, error refused; Railroad Com. v. Tips, Tex.Civ.App., 130 S.W.2d 1078.

2. Under the above wording of his certificate, either (1) he is expressly authorized to operate over State Highways 2 and 6 south of Dallas, or (2) such wording is at least ambiguous in that regard and he is entitled to the benefit of any doubtful meaning in the language employed by the Commission. This contention is manifestly without merit. There is no ambiguity whatever in the language employed; which clearly excludes operation on Highways 2 and 6 south of Dallas.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      18,708,081
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  262,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 73,015,785
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       5,419,688
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,978,526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             102,040,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     46,955,132
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       462,553
<OTHER-SE>                                  41,474,354
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               102,040,903
<SALES>                                     77,454,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            87,935,892
<CGS>                                       70,308,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               78,492,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,074,117
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             411,136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,041,821)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,041,821)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,041,821)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.09)


</TABLE>