alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3

                                    AGREEMENT


         AGREEMENT dated this 26th day of October 2004, by and between Creative
Solutions With Art, Inc. (hereinafter "CSA"), a Nevada Corporation, with offices
located at 32C Hadley Village Road, South Hadley, MA. 01075 and Carla Santia,
President of CSA.
         WHEREAS, CSA has filed a Registration Statement with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission (hereinafter the "SEC") on Form SB-2 and has
filed an Exhibit 10.2 to such Registration Statement regarding methods of
payment of offering expenses; and
         WHEREAS, the SEC has requested that such Registration Statement include
in the Liquidity section, a specific discussion of CSA's cash requirements for
the next twelve (12) months (exclusive of offering expenses) and its specific
viable plans to meet such requirements.
         NOW, THEREFORE, it is herewith agreed as follows:
         The undersigned, as President of CSA herewith agrees to differ CSA
compensation otherwise payable to her so as to permit CSA to remain viable.
         The parties hereto understand that the above constitutes a binding
Agreement and that the contents thereof are referred to in the aforesaid
Registration Statement in the subheading entitled "Liquidity" as found in the
Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation section.
         The above constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties hereto.
         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed as of the 26th day of October 2004.

CREATIVE SOLUTIONS WITH ART, INC.



By: /s/Carla Santia
    --------------------------
    Carla Santia, President

By: /s/Carla Santia
    --------------------------
    Carla Santia, Individually
Exhibit
14

CODE
OF ETHICS FOR THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING
OFFICER

This Code
of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief
Accounting Officer (this Code of Ethics) governs the conduct of the
Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Accounting Officer
of Sunrise Energy Resources, Inc. (the Company). This Code of Ethics
is designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote ethical and legal behavior by the
Companys Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief
Accounting Officer.

The Chief
Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Accounting Officer are
responsible for:

a) Acting
with honesty and integrity, and avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of interest
involving personal and professional relationships. A conflict of interest
exists when an individuals private interests interfere or conflict in any
way (or even appear to interfere or conflict) with the interests of the Company;

b) Ensuring
that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures function properly and
providing information that is full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable for
Securities and Exchange Commission filings and in other public communications made
by the Company;

c) Complying
with applicable laws, rules, and regulations of all U.S. and non-U.S. governmental
entities, as well as other private and public regulatory agencies to which the Company
is subject;

d) Acting
in good faith and, responsibly with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting
material facts or allowing independent judgment to violate this Code of Ethics; and

e) Reporting
illegal or unethical conduct by a director, officer or employee that has occurred,
is occurring or may occur, including any potential violations of this Code of Ethics.

Violations
of this Code of Ethics shall be reported to the Chairman of the Audit Committee of
the Board of Directors whether the violations are of a financial or non-financial
nature. The waiver of any duty or responsibility set forth in this Code of Ethics
must be made by the Board of Directors of the Company. This Code of Ethics will be
an Exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, and posted to the Company
website.

---

Acknowledgment

This is
to acknowledge receipt of the Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, the
Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Accounting Officer. I understand that failure
to adhere to the principles and responsibilities set forth in this Code of Ethics
may result in disciplinary action, including reprimand, warnings, suspension, demotion,
salary reduction, restitution and/or discharge, as well as possible legal penalties.

Name: Name
Chief Executive OfficerSignature: /s/ Konstantin TsirulnikovKonstantin
Tsirulnikov Chairman of the Board of Director, CEO, CFODate: March 31,
2006

2

---
2002 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

1-30-2002

Cox v. Comm Social Security

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 1-2143

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2002 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Cox v. Comm Social Security" (2002). 2002 Decisions. Paper 66.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002/66
 NOT PRECEDENTIAL 

 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 

 No. 01-2143 

 

 CAMILLA COX, 

 for Camilla N. Cox 

 v. 

 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY 

 Camilla Cox, 

 Appellant 

 

 On Appeal from the United States District Court 

 for the District of New Jersey 

 (D.C. Civ. No. 99-03478) 

 District Judge: Honorable Nicholas H. Politan 

 

 Submitted under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) 

 January 16, 2002 

 BEFORE: SCIRICA, GREENBERG, and BRIGHT,* Circuit Judges 

 (Filed: January 29, 2002) 

 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT 

 

 

*Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior Judge of the United States Court of 

Appeals for the 

 Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation. 

GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. 

 Camilla Cox for Camilla N. Cox appeals from a final order entered 

March 12, 

2001, affirming the decision in this matter rejecting her claim for 

childhood disability SSI 

payments. The administrative law judge in her decision dated February 4, 

1998, and the 

district court in its letter opinion dated March 9, 2001, set forth the 

background of the 
case and, as the parties are fully familiar with it, we do no recite it. 

Insofar as we review 

the order of the district court we exercise plenary review but insofar as 

we review the 

Commissioner's findings we determine whether the administrative record 

contains 

substantial evidence for the findings. See Knepp v. Apfel, 204 F.3d 78, 

83 (3d Cir. 

2000). 

 After a careful review of this mater we are convinced that there 

were no errors of 

law and that the Commissioner's findings are fully supported in the 

record. 

Consequently, the order of March 12, 2001, will be affirmed. 

 

TO THE CLERK: 

 Please file the foregoing memorandum opinion.

 /s/ Morton I. Greenberg 

 Circuit Judge 

DATED: January 29, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000874534
<NAME> OUTDOOR SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,887
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,975
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,174
<PP&E>                                         742,144
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 933,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,032
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           402
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   933,455
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               173,116
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               123,435
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,489
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,536
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,336
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (17,780)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,444)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF IMC MORTGAGE COMPANY FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,708
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          17,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,836
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,043,926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<COMMON>                                           330
<OTHER-SE>                                     288,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,043,926
<SALES>                                        184,743
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               265,007
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               190,683
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             118,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 57,015
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,615
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,615
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.93
        

</TABLE>
|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |  |
| INDIANA                                        | 35-1544218 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

----

|            |
|------------|
|            |  |  |  |
| VOTES FOR  | VOTES AGAINST | VOTES ABSTAINED | BROKER NON-VOTES |
| 20,529,881 | 134,836 | 92,134 |   |

|            |
|------------|
|            |  |  |  |
| VOTES FOR  | VOTES AGAINST | VOTES ABSTAINED | BROKER NON-VOTES |
| 18,691,348 | 1,955,229 | 110,274 |   |

----
[No. 35431.

Department Two.

January 5, 1961.]

#### H. E. Storms, *Respondent,*v. Benjamin R. Vincent *et al., Appellants.*
      *1*

*A. O. Colburn,*for appellants.

*Edmund T. Brigham,*for respondent.

Reported in 358 P. (2d) 135.

Per Curiam.

— Defendants in the superior court appeal from a judgment adjudicating the existence of a road over their property and enjoining its obstruction.

The findings of fact are that the road in question existed continuously since 1918 or earlier; that for the full period of the statute it was used by the plaintiff and his predecessors and by the public; and that such use of the road

> “ . . . has been open, notorious, continuous, and uninterrupted, and over a uniform route, namely over the same well defined and recognizable road, and adverse to all the defendants and to all their predecessors in ownership . . . ”

There is no assignment of error to this finding of fact, which, therefore, is an accepted verity. The assignments of error are:

> “1. The evidence is insufficient to prove the establishment of the road as a public highway.

> “2. The evidence shows that the use of the road was permissive only.

> “3. The Court erred in granting judgment for plaintiff.

> “4. The Court erred in denying the motion for a new trial.

> “5. The Court erred in not dismissing the action.

> “6. The Court erred in not considering the equities of the situation.”

Such are not assignments of error, but are invitations to search the record to see if error can be found. *Scroggin v. Worthy,*51 Wn. (2d) 119, 316 P. (2d) 480; *Koster v. Wingard,*50 Wn. (2d) 855, 314 P. (2d) 928. This we will not do.

The findings support the judgment, which is affirmed.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In the interest of L.A.S

. and * From the 326 th District Court

A.L.S., children, of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 8296

- CX

.

No. 11

- 17

- 00351

- CV * June 14, 2018

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

Bailey , J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the

appeal should be dismissed . Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion,

the appe al is dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 179 (Monday, September 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 75548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20958]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIDDK RC2 Review.
    Date: October 29, 2024.
    Time: 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 
7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Elena Sanovich, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney 
Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, 
Rm. 7351, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-8886, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8efdefe0e1f8e7ede6ebcee3efe7e2a0e0e7e6a0e9e1f8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7e0d1f101108171d161b3e131f17125010171650191108">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 10, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-20958 Filed 9-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Pawling, Appellant, *v.*Chalmers Motor Co.

*Judgments*— Order *opening judgment*— *Subsequent judgment for amount admitted to be due*— Practice, *Supreme Court*— Appeal *from order opening judgment*— Quashing *appeals.*

Where a judgment entered for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense was opened and judgment was thereafter taken for the amount admitted to be due in a supplemental affidavit of defense, and such judgment was satisfied “without prejudice to the rights of the plaintiff to proceed for the collection of the balance of the claim,” plaintiff’s remedy is to proceed for the collection of what *417be still claims to be due from tbe defendant, and an appeal from an order opening tbe original judgment will be quashed.

Argued March 24, 1916.

Appeal, No. 394, Jan. T., 1914, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 1, Philadelphia Co., Dec. T., 1913, No. 4831, making absolute defendant’s rule to open judgment in case of George F. Pawling & Company, a Corporation, v. Chalmers Motor Company of Philadelphia, a Corporation.

Before Brown, C. J., Mestrezat, Potter, Moschzisker and Frazer, JJ.

Appeal quashed.

Assumpsit upon oral and written agreements. •

Petition to open a judgment. Before Patterson, J.

The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court.

The lower court opened the judgment. Plaintiff appealed.

*Error assigned*was in making absolute the rule to open judgment.

*Owen J. Roberts,*with him *D. II. Solis-Oohen*and *8. D. Matlock,*for appellant.

*Edwin O. Lewis,*for appellee.

April 17, 1916 :

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order of the court below, opening a judgment which it had entered for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. After the order to open had been made plaintiff took a rule for judgment for the amount admitted to be due in a supplemental affidavit of defense, and, this rule having been made absolute, judgment was entered against the defendant for $1,027.36. Subsequently it paid this, and, by a writing filed, the judgment was satisfied, without “prejudice to the right of plaintiff to proceed for the collection of the balance of claim.” This is the docket entry made at the instance of *418plaintiff’s attorney. Haying availed itself of this judgment, its appeal from the order opening the original judgment cannot be entertained. Its remedy is to proceed for the collection of what it claims is still due by the defendant. The motion to quash is allowed.

Appeal quashed.
Resignation(Officer)


EXHIBIT 10-01

GOLDEN SPIRIT ENTERPRISES LTD.

(the “Company”)

Officer and Director Resignation

I hereby resign as Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective immediately.

Dated:  November 18, 2008





	/s/: M. Scheive    

	 Marc Scheive
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001012466
<NAME> BIGMAR, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         105,737
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,796,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,270,754
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,480,155
<PP&E>                                      17,744,188
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,236,264
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,294,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,443,238
<BONDS>                                     10,266,589
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,169
<OTHER-SE>                                     157,354
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,294,546
<SALES>                                      5,823,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,823,345
<CGS>                                        4,721,822
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,633,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             706,974
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,995,854)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,995,854)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                361,837
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,634,017)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)


</TABLE>