Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 101 / Tuesday, May 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 30017 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

2014–10–03 Airbus Helicopters (Type 

Certificate previously held by 

Eurocopter France): Amendment 39– 

17850; Docket No. FAA–2014–0306; 

Directorate Identifier 2013–SW–046–AD. 

(a) Applicability 

This AD applies to Model AS332L1 

helicopters, serial number (S/N) 2774, and 

Model EC225LP helicopters, S/N 2600, 2623, 

2645, 2656, 2659, 2663, 2666, 2670, 2673, 

2685, 2691, 2692, 2693, 2702, 2715, 2716, 

2721, 2725, 2739, 2744, 2747, 2753, 2756, 

2759, 2767, 2779, and 2794, certificated in 

any category. 

(b) Unsafe Condition 

This AD defines the unsafe condition as 

engine ice ingestion during flight, which 

could result in complete loss of engine thrust 

and possible loss of control of the helicopter. 

(c) Effective Date 

This AD becomes effective June 11, 2014. 

(d) Compliance 

You are responsible for performing each 

action required by this AD within the 

specified compliance time unless it has 

already been accomplished prior to that time. 

(e) Required Actions 

Before flight into known icing conditions: 

(1) For Model AS332L1 helicopter, S/N 

2774, relocate the engine 1 Multi-Purpose Air 

Intake (MPAI) power supply circuit breaker 

as described in the Accomplishment 

Instructions, paragraph 3.B.2., and Figures 1, 

2, and 3 of Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin 

(ASB) No. AS332–30.00.74, Revision 0, dated 

July 31, 2013. 

(2) For Model EC225LP helicopters, S/N 

2600, 2623, 2645, 2656, 2659, 2663, 2666, 

2670, 2673, and 2693, relocate the engine 2 

MPAI power supply circuit breaker as 

described in the Accomplishment 

Instructions, paragraph 3.B.2.a., and Figures 

1 and 2 of Eurocopter ASB No. EC225– 

30A032, Revision 0, dated July 31, 2013. 

(3) For Model EC225LP helicopters, S/N 

2685, 2691, 2692, 2702, 2715, 2716, 2721, 

2725, 2739, 2744, 2747, 2753, 2756, 2759, 

2767, 2779, and 2794, relocate the engine 2 

MPAI power supply circuit breaker as 

described in the Accomplishment 

Instructions, paragraph 3.B.2.b., and Figures 

1 and 3 of Eurocopter ASB No. EC225– 

30A032. 

(4) For all model helicopters, perform a 

functional test of each MPAI after relocating 

the MPAI power supply circuit breaker. 

(f) Special Flight Permits 

Special flight permits are prohibited for 

flights into known icing conditions. 

(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Safety Management 

Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this 

AD. Send your proposal to: George Schwab, 

Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management 

Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601 

Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; 

telephone (817) 222–5110; email 

george.schwab@faa.gov. 

(2) For operations conducted under a 14 

CFR part 119 operating certificate or under 

14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that 

you notify your principal inspector, or 

lacking a principal inspector, the manager of 

the local flight standards district office or 

certificate holding district office, before 

operating any aircraft complying with this 

AD through an AMOC. 

(h) Additional Information 

The subject of this AD is addressed in 

European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 

No. 2013–0173, dated August 1, 2013. You 

may view the EASA AD on the internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov in Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0306. 

(i) Subject 

Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) 

Code: 3097: Ice/Rain Protection System 

Wiring. 

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin No. 

AS332–30.00.74, Revision 0, dated July 31, 

2013. 

(ii) Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin No. 

EC225–30A032, Revision 0, dated July 31, 

2013. 

(3) For Eurocopter service information 

identified in this AD, contact Airbus 

Helicopters, Inc., 2701 N. Forum Drive, 

Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone (972) 

641–0000 or (800) 232–0323; fax (972) 641– 

3775; or at http://

www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub. 

(4) You may view this service information 

at FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, 

Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., 

Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

(202) 741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 6, 

2014. 

Kim Smith, 

Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–11528 Filed 5–23–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–1062; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–ACE–3] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Modification of Air Traffic Service 

(ATS) Routes; North Central United 

States 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action modifies three Jet 

Routes (J–45, J–151, and J–233) and a 

high altitude area navigation (RNAV) 

route (Q–19). The FAA is taking this 

action due to a service restriction of the 

Des Moines, IA (DSM), VHF 

Omnidirectional Range (VOR)/Tactical 

Air Navigation (VORTAC) facility that 

provides navigation guidance for a 

portion of the ATS routes identified. 

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, July 

24, 2014. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under 1 CFR part 51, 

subject to the annual revision of FAA 

Order 7400.9 and publication of 

conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Colby Abbott, Airspace Policy and 

Regulations Group, Office of Airspace 

Services, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On Wednesday, January 22, 2014, the 

FAA published in the Federal Register 

a notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM) to modify J–45, J–151, J–233, 

and Q–19 in the vicinity of the DSM 

VORTAC, Des Moines, IA (79 FR 3545). 

Interested parties were invited to 

participate in this rulemaking effort by 

submitting written comments on this 

proposal to the FAA. No comments 

were received in response to the NPRM. 

Differences From the NPRM 

Subsequent to publication of the 

NPRM, an error in the J–233 route 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
30018 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 101 / Tuesday, May 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

description format was identified. 

Airway and route legal descriptions are 

published in FAA Order 7400.9X, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points. Current format guidelines for 

these legal descriptions require that the 

order of points in a description be listed 

from ‘‘south-to-north’’ or from ‘‘west-toeast,’’ as applicable. The description for 

J–233 in the NPRM listed the points 

from ‘‘north-to-south,’’ in error. The rule 

simply reverses the order of the points 

listed for J–233 to a ‘‘south-to-north’’ 

format for standardization. The route 

structure is unchanged from that 

proposed in the NPRM. 

The Rule 

This action amends Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by 

modifying Jet Routes J–45, J–151, and J– 

233, and high altitude RNAV route Q– 

19. The DSM, VOR radial restrictions 

have made this action necessary. The 

route modifications are outlined below. 

J–45: J–45 extends between Virginia 

Key, FL, and Aberdeen, SD. The route 

segment between the St Louis, MO 

(STL), and DSM VORTACs is relocated 

over the Kirksville, MO (IRK), VORTAC 

and extended approximately four 

nautical miles (NM) to restore navigable 

route structure using serviceable DSM 

VOR radials. 

J–151: J–151 extends between Cross 

City, FL, and Whitehall, MT. The route 

segment between STL and O’Neil, NE 

(ONL), VORTACs is realigned over the 

IRK and Omaha, NE (OVR), VORTACs, 

providing a nearly direct routing from 

STL to ONL and reducing the route 

segment by 12.5 NM. 

J–233: J–233 extends between STL 

and Waterloo, IA (ALO). The route is 

realigned over the IRK VORTAC to 

resolve an extended service volume 

flight check failure impacting the 

navigable use of the route. 

Q–19: Q–19 extends between 

Nashville, TN (BNA), and the PLESS fix, 

overlying a portion of J–45. The route is 

extended northwest from the PLESS fix 

over the STL VORTAC to the DSM 

VORTAC, retaining a direct routing 

capability between STL and DSM for 

aircraft capable of flying RNAV routes. 

The navigation aid radials cited in the 

proposed Jet Route and high altitude 

RNAV route descriptions below, are 

stated relative to True north. 

Jet Routes are published in paragraph 

2004 and high altitude RNAV routes (Q) 

are published in paragraph 2006, 

respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9X 

dated August 7, 2013, and effective 

September 15, 2013, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Jet Routes and high altitude 

RNAV route listed in this document will 

be subsequently published in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that only affects air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, does not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in 

Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 

40103. Under that section, the FAA is 

charged with prescribing regulations to 

assign the use of the airspace necessary 

to ensure the safety of aircraft and the 

efficient use of airspace. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority as 

it modifies the route structure as 

necessary to preserve the safe and 

efficient flow of air traffic within the 

NAS. 

Environmental Review 

The FAA has determined that this 

action qualifies for categorical exclusion 

under the National Environmental 

Policy Act in accordance with FAA 

Order 1050.1E, Environmental Impacts: 

Policies and Procedures, paragraph 

311a. This airspace action is not 

expected to cause any potentially 

significant environmental impacts, and 

no extraordinary circumstances exist 

that warrant preparation of an 

environmental assessment. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9X, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 7, 2013 and 

effective September 15, 2013, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 2004 Jet Routes. 

J–45 [Amended] 

From Virginia Key, FL; INT Virginia Key 

014° and Treasure, FL, 143° radials; Treasure; 

INT Treasure 330° and Ormond Beach, FL, 

183° radials; Ormond Beach; Craig, FL; Alma, 

GA; Macon, GA; Atlanta, GA; Nashville, TN; 

St Louis, MO; Kirksville, MO; Des Moines, 

IA; Sioux Falls, SD; to Aberdeen, SD. 

* * * * * 

J–151 [Amended] 

From Cross City, FL; Vulcan, AL; 

Farmington, MO; St. Louis, MO; Kirksville, 

MO; Omaha, NE; O’Neil, NE; Rapid City, SD; 

Billings, MT; INT Billings 266° and 

Whitehall, MT, 103° radials; to Whitehall. 

* * * * * 

J–233 [Amended] 

From St. Louis, MO; Kirksville, MO; to 

Waterloo, IA. 

* * * * * 

Paragraph 2006 United States Area 

Navigation Routes. 

Q–19 Nashville, TN (BNA) to Aberdeen, SD (ABR) [Amended] 

Nashville, TN 

(BNA) 

VORTAC (Lat. 36°08′13′′ N., long. 86°41′05′′ W.) 

PLESS, IL Fix (Lat. 37°48′35′′ N., long. 88°57′48′′ W.) 

St. Louis, MO 

(STL) 

VORTAC (Lat. 38°51′38′′ N., long. 90°28′57′′ W.) 

Des Moines, IA 

(DSM) 

VORTAC (Lat. 41°26′15′′ N., long. 93°38′55′′ W.) 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 101 / Tuesday, May 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 30019 

Sioux Falls, SD 

(FSD) 

VORTAC (Lat. 43°38′58′′ N., long. 96°46′52′′ W.) 

Aberdeen, SD 

(ABR) 

VOR/DME (Lat. 45°25′02′′ N., long. 98°22′07′′ W.) 

* * * * * 

Issued in Washington, DC, on May 19, 

2014. 

Gary A. Norek, 

Manager, Airspace Policy and Regulations 

Group. 

[FR Doc. 2014–11999 Filed 5–23–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0922; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–AWA–5] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Modification of the Philadelphia, PA, 

Class B Airspace Area 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action amends the 

description of Area G of the 

Philadelphia Class B airspace area to 

correct a design error that resulted in 

the Class B airspace boundary being 

published 2.1 nautical miles (NM) larger 

on the southeast side of the area than 

intended. There are no other changes to 

the Philadelphia Class B airspace area. 

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, July 24, 

2014. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under 1 CFR part 51, 

subject to the annual revision of FAA 

Order 7400.9 and publication of 

conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Gallant, Airspace Policy and 

Regulations Group, Office of Airspace 

Services, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

The FAA published in the Federal 

Register a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to modify Area G of 

the Philadelphia, PA, Class B airspace 

area (78 FR 76779, December 19, 2013). 

Interested parties were invited to 

participate in this rulemaking effort by 

submitting written comments on the 

proposal. No comments were received. 

The Rule 

The FAA is amending Title 14 Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 

to correct two points used to define the 

boundaries of Area G in the description 

of the Philadelphia Class B airspace 

area. Specifically, the point that reads 

‘‘. . .the intersection of the PHL 20-mile 

radius and the 136° bearing from 

PHL. . .’’ is changed to read ‘‘. . .the 

intersection of the 17.9-mile radius and 

the 138° bearing from PHL. . . .’’ This 

point appears in two places in the Area 

G description. In addition, the point that 

reads ‘‘. . .the intersection of the PHL 

20-mile radius and the 120° bearing 

from PHL. . .’’ is changed to read 

‘‘. . .the intersection of the 20-mile 

radius and the 118° bearing from PHL. 

. . .’’ This point appears once in the 

Area G description. This change results 

in a small reduction in the lateral 

dimensions of Class B airspace, 

southeast of Philadelphia International 

Airport, near the Cross Keys Airport, NJ 

(17N). This action does not modify any 

other parts of the Philadelphia Class B 

airspace area. 

Class B airspace areas are published 

in paragraph 3000 of FAA Order 

7400.9X dated August 7, 2013, and 

effective September 15, 2013, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class B airspace area listed in 

this document will be published 

subsequently in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that only affects air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of the airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it makes 

editorial corrections to an existing Class 

B airspace description to maintain 

accuracy. 

Regulatory Evaluation Summary 

Changes to federal regulations must 

undergo several economic analyses. 

First, Executive Order 12866 and 

Executive Order 13563 direct that each 

Federal agency shall propose or adopt a 

regulation only upon a reasoned 

determination that the benefits of the 

intended regulation justify its costs. 

Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

of 1980 (Public Law 96–354) requires 

agencies to analyze the economic 

impact of regulatory changes on small 

entities. Third, the Trade Agreements 

Act (Pub. L. 96–39) prohibits agencies 

from setting standards that create 

unnecessary obstacles to the foreign 

commerce of the United States. In 

developing U.S. standards, the Trade 

Act requires agencies to consider 

international standards and, where 

appropriate, that they be the basis of 

U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded 

Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 

104–4) requires agencies to prepare a 

written assessment of the costs, benefits, 

and other effects of proposed or final 

rules that include a Federal mandate 

likely to result in the expenditure by 

State, local, or tribal governments, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector, of 

$100 million or more annually (adjusted 

for inflation with base year of 1995). 

This portion of the preamble 

summarizes the FAA’s analysis of the 

economic impacts of this final rule. 

Department of Transportation Order 

DOT 2100.5 prescribes policies and 

procedures for simplification, analysis, 

and review of regulations. If the 

expected cost impact is so minimal that 

a final rule does not warrant a full 

evaluation, this order permits that a 

statement to that effect and the basis for 

it to be included in the preamble if a full 

regulatory evaluation of the cost and 

benefits is not prepared. Such a 

determination has been made for this 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES