alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76884-76885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21319]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 309 to Competitive Product List. Documents

[[Page 76885]]

are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-639, CP2024-648.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21319 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Exhibit 10.2

                               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
No. 333-11840 (Form S-8) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 18, 2000, of our report dated April 15 ,2003 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Coresma Ltd. included in this Annual Report
(Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2003.


Barzily & Co.


(Former name:"Kost Forer & Gabbay in partnership with Michael Barzily & Co. ")

Jerusalem, Israel
August 15, 2004
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of WellPoint Health Networks Inc. (the“Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, DavidC. Colby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 14, 2003 | /s/ David C.  Colby      |   |
|-------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                    | David C.  Colby          |
|                    | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Order entered August 13, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00851-CV

LSREF2 APEX (TX) II, LLC, Appellant

V.

GREGORY BLOMQUIST AND DANIEL D. DAVIDS, II, Appellees

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-02840-2012

ORDER

The clerk’s record in this case is incomplete. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the 

district clerk to file a supplemental clerks record on or before August 18, 2014 including the 

agreed order dated November 28, 2012 setting aside the trial court’s October 29, 2012 order 

granting summary judgment. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this order by 

electronic transmission to Andrea Stroh Thompson, District Clerk.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Christian S. Schade, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Annual Report of Medarex, Inc. on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information containedin such Annual Report of Medarex, Inc. on Form 10-K fairlypresents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Medarex, Inc.
| Date: February 28, 2007 | By:        | /s/ CHRISTIAN S. SCHADE                             |
|------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | **Name:**  | **Christian  S. Schade**                                 |
|                         | **Title:** | ***Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*** |

 

Signed originals of these written statements requiredby Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging orotherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within theelectronic version of these written statements required by Section 906,have been provided to Medarex, Inc. and will be retained by Medarex, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

This Certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 15(d) andshall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act(15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. ThisCertification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent thatthe Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

----
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JAN 21, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-11799

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 03-00718-CV-ORL-31-KRS

MODERN, INC., a Florida corporation,

FIRST OMNI SERVICE CORP., a Florida

corporation,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

STATE OF FLORIDA,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Defendants-Appellees,

ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT,

Defendant-Third-PartyPlaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BREVARD COUNTY, et al.,

Third-Party-Defendants.
________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(January 21, 2009)

Before HULL, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, we conclude that Appellants Modern, Inc.

and First Omni Service Corp. have not shown reversible error in the district court’s

January 28, 2008 order, which was entered after a three-week bench trial and

which grants final judgment in favor of the Appellees.

AFFIRMED.

2
##### 



Exhibit 10-N-8
 OTTER TAIL CORPORATION
1999 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
2005 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
FOR EMPLOYEES
    Award of Restricted Stock
 Rights of the Participant with Respect to the Shares
 Vesting
 Change of Control




---



##### 



Additional Vesting Rules; Forfeiture
  2




---



##### 



Restriction on Transfer
 Issuance and Custody of Certificates
   3




---



##### 



Distributions and Adjustments
    Income Tax Matters
  4




---



##### 



Miscellaneous
        5




---



##### 



OTTER TAIL CORPORATION  1999 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD CERTIFICATE FOR EMPLOYEES
     Grant Type:
    
    Restricted StockNumber of Common Shares:Grant Date:
    
    April 11, 2005Vesting Schedule:
 Percentage ofDate
    
    Restricted Stock VestedApril 8, 2006
    
    
    25
    %April 8, 2007
    
    
    25
    %April 8, 2008
    
    
    25
    %April 8, 2009
    
    
    25
    %
  OTTER TAIL CORPORATIONBy:John D. EricksonPresident and Chief Executive Officer[Name of recipient]
 6
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2298 

To prohibit oil and gas leasing on the Outer Continental Shelf off the 

coast of New England. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 11, 2018 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. HASSAN, Mrs. SHAHEEN, 

Mr. REED, Mr. KING, Ms. WARREN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. COLLINS, 

and Mr. MURPHY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit oil and gas leasing on the Outer Continental 

Shelf off the coast of New England. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘New England Coastal 

5 Protection Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2298 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING ON THE 

2 OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF OFF THE COAST 

3 OF NEW ENGLAND. 

4 Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

5 (43 U.S.C. 1337) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(q) PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN

8 CERTAIN AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.— 

9 Notwithstanding any other provision of this section or any 

10 other law, the Secretary may not issue a lease for the ex11 ploration for, or development or production of, oil or nat12 ural gas in any area of the outer Continental Shelf off 

13 the coast of the State of Maine, New Hampshire, Massa14 chusetts, Rhode Island, or Connecticut.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6467

JACK ARNOLD MCINTYRE, Petitioner - Appellant,

versus GARY D. MAYNARD, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections; CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-02-1335-2-17AJ)
Submitted: July 24, 2003 Decided: July 30, 2003
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jack Arnold McIntyre, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jack Arnold McIntyre seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McIntyre has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# TiLiJlNCOURTOFW^EALS !2thCourtofA£Ee3llDistricl
TYCEHTEXAS 

### CATHY3.LUSK, CLl*

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 

### «?^

t FILE COPY

8/19/2015 COA No. 12-14-00053-CR 

### EVANS, FRANKANTHONYJR. Tr. Ct. No. 007-1297-13 PD-0849-15 

### On this day, this Court has granted the Appellant's Pro Se Motion to Suspend Rule 9.3(b) T.R.A.P. Abel Acosta, Clerk 12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK CATHY LUSK 1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354 TYLER, TX 75701 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
Final Notes July 9, 2010

Steam Study Data Review Notes

Mercury in Water Method 1631 Revision E (2002)

(Oxidation, Purge and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence 

Spectrometry)

1. For the determination of total Hg, the samples should be preserved by adding 5 ml/L of 

BrCl solution in a mercury-free clean area in the laboratory within 48 hours of collection.

(1631E/8.5). If reported, indicate the elapsed time between sample collection and 

preservation and list any samples that were not preserved in time. 

2. For dissolved Hg, the samples should be filtered before preservation using a 0.45 μm 

capsule filter in a mercury-free clean area in the laboratory within 48 hours of collection. 

Immediately after filtration, the samples should be preserved with 5 ml/L of BrCl 

solution (1631E/6.1.3/8.4). If reported indicate the elapsed time between sample 

collection, filtration, and preservation and list any samples that were not filtered or 

preserved in time.

3. Sample bottles should be stored in new polyethylene bags until analysis is completed.

4. Because of the presence of sulfides and organic matter, sample may require the addition 

of more BrCl. Enough BrCl should be added to the samples to maintain a yellow color 

for 12 hours (1631E/11.1.1).

5. To prevent carryover samples should be run in the following order: FGD effluent and 

FGD influent.

6. All samples should be analyzed consistently with one system either the bubbler system or 

the flow injection system.

7. MS/MSD samples should be analyzed for each midpoint and effluent point in a sampling 

episode. The concentration of Hg added to the MS/MSD samples should be either 1-5 

times the ML (0.5 ng/L) or 1-5 times the background concentration whichever is greater.

8. The concentration of Hg in the bubbler blank or system blank should be used to calculate 

Hg concentration as designated in the formulas in Method 1631E. Note whether the lab 

has automatically incorporated the bubbler blank or system blank into the data results 

(1631E/12.2.2/12.3.2).

9. *If the analyte concentration in a sample was less than 5 times the analyte concentration 

in the method blank, report the result as a nondetect. List all affected samples:

10. *If the analyte concentration in a sample was less than 10 times but greater than 5 times 

the analyte concentration in the method blank, report the result as an estimated value. List 

all affected samples:
Steam Study Data Review Notes

Mercury in Water Method 1631 Revision E (2002)

Page 2 of 2

Final Notes July 9, 2010

11. Reagent, method, and field blanks with concentrations below the ML, but above or at the 

MDL should be reported in ng/L with two significant figures. Note whether the lab 

automatically reported the data in this way.

12. Reagent, method, and field blanks with concentrations below the MDL should be 

reported as <0.2 ng/L (1631E/12.5). Note whether the lab automatically reported the data 

in this way.

13. If reported, note if positive hits were checked for contamination and/or carryover?
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 4678-053]

      ( print page 76112)    
                    Concurrent with this notice, a letter order was issued granting the New York Power Authority's (NYPA) request to extend the deadline for filing motions to intervene, protests, comments, recommendations, preliminary terms and conditions, and preliminary fishway prescriptions for the Crescent Hydroelectric Project No. 4678 (Crescent Project).[1]                                          Consistent with the letter order, this notice extends the deadlines for filing motions to intervene, protests, comments, recommendations, preliminary terms and conditions, and preliminary fishway prescriptions for the Crescent Project from September 16, 2024 until March 17, 2025. The deadline for filing reply comments is extended from October 31, 2024, to May 1, 2025. This notice also extends the deadline for requesting water quality certification for the Crescent Project from September 16, 2024, until March 17, 2025.                

Dated: September 10, 2024.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Acting Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *See https://elibrary.ferc.gov/​eLibrary/​filelist?​accession_​num=​20240910-3041.*
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2024-21027 Filed 9-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Resignation(Officer)


EXHIBIT 10-02

LEGACY WINE & SPIRITS INTERNATIONAL LTD.

(the “Company”)

 Director Resignation

I hereby resign as Director of the Company effective immediately.

Dated:  October 1, 2008

	
	/s/: D. Zhang    

	David Zhang









Resignation accepted this 18th day of November, 2008







/s/: C. Scheive




Christopher Scheive

President
#### Cecola *v.*44 Cigar Company, Appellant.

*Negligence*— Automobiles — *Pedestrian*— Workman *in*street— *Collision*— Case *for fury.*

1. The fact that a person. injured in a collision with an automobile was not an ordinary pedestrian with no other care than for his own safety but was a workman engaged in his work on the street should be taken into consideration in measuring his alleged negligence.

2. In an action by a workman engaged upon a city street to recover damages for injuries sustained in consequence of being struck by defendant’s automobile, the questions of defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence are for the jury and a verdict for the plaintiff will be sustained where it appears that plaintiff had stooped down to pick up a Belgian block, that he looked just before he stooped and saw nothing coming, that he was struck immediately after picking up the block, there being evidence that the driver of the car gave no warning of its approach.

Argued April 20, 1916.

Appeal, No. 405, Jan. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia Co., Dec. T-, 1914, No. 2314, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Filippo Cecola v. 44 Cigar Company, a Corporation.

Before Brown, O. J., Mestrezat, Potter, Frazer and Warring, JJ.

Affirmed.

*624Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Staples, P. J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts.

Verdict for plaintiff for $3,000.00 and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed.

*Errors assigned*were rulings on evidence, the refusal of the court to direct a verdict for defendant and to enter judgment for defendant n. o. v.

*Robert P. SMck,*with him *Winfield W. Crawford,*for appellant.

*Harry S. Ambler, Jr.,*with him *Frank R. Ambler,*for appellee.

May 15, 1916 :

Per Curiam,

The plaintiff below, while at work on one of the streets of the City of Philadelphia, as a repairman of the Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company, was struck by an automobile of the defendant company, and, for the injuries which he sustained, he brought'this action. He was struck just after he had picked up a Belgian block to carry it over to a hole in the street. His testimony was that just before he stooped down for the block he had looked and had seen nothing coming towards him. Several witnesses called by him testified that the driver of the automobile had given no warning of its approach. Under this testimony the negligence of the defendant, and the contributory negligence of the plaintiff were for the jury. He was not an ordinary pedestrian, with no other care than his own safety; on the contrary he was at his work on the street, and this fact could be taken into consideration in measuring his alleged negligence: Craven v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co., 243 Pa. 619. We have not been convinced that any of the assignments of error call for a retrial of the case.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AnnTaylor Stores
 Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
 and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, J. Patrick Spainhour, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
 and James M. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of each of our
 knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  March 9, 2004 | /s/J. Patrick Spainhour
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     | J. Patrick Spainhour   
|                     | Chief Executive Officer

|Date:  March 9, 2004 | /s/James M. Smith      
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     | James M. Smith         
|                     | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required
 by Section 906 has been provided to AnnTaylor Stores Corporation and will be retained by AnnTaylor Stores
 Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
 Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
 of 1934, as amended.