alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Grants Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         October 24-25, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m..                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Canopy by Hilton, 940 Rose Avenue, North Bethesda, MD 20852 (Hybrid Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Aiwu Cheng, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20982, (301) 594-4859, email:                         *aiwu.cheng@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 10, 2024.

Bruce A. George, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-20916 Filed 9-13-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WellPoint Health Networks Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David C. Colby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|                                                                       |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/DAVID C. COLBYDavid C. Colby Chief Financial OfficerAugust 13, 2002 |  | 

---

QuickLinks
Filed by sedaredgar.com - Exploration Drilling International Inc. - Exhibit 10.74






Addendum to the loan agreement dated 26/09/2007 

Extension 

LOAN AGREEMENT 

between 

EDI Exploration Drilling International Holding GmbH

Represented by the Managing Director [“Geschäftsführer”] 
Günter Thiemann

Goethestrasse 61 
45721 Haltern am See 

- in the following referred to as Lender -

and 

EDI Exploration Drilling International GmbH 
represented by
the Managing Director [“Geschäftsführer”] 
Christian Runge 
Goethestrasse
59 
45721 Haltern am See 

- in the following referred to as Borrower -

The loan agreement, to which this addendum applies, is changed,
effective immediately, in Section 2 paragraphs 2 and 3 as follows: 

Section 2               
  Interest, term and repayment of loan 

	 	2. 	
      The term shall be extended by approx. 6 months and ends
      on March 31, 2009.

	 	3. 	
      The loan shall be repaid on March 31, 2009 into the
      Lender’s account.



All other provisions remain unchanged and valid. 

Haltern, on September 20, 2008 

	[Signature] 	 	  
	  	 	  
	EDI Holding GmbH 	 	EDI GmbH 
	Günter Thiemann 	 	Christian Runge 
	- Lender - 	 	- Borrower - 
	  	 	  
	  	 	  
	[File name]
Resignation(Officer)


EXHIBIT 10-1

SHOTGUN ENERGY CORPORATION

(the “Company”)

Officer and Director Resignation

I hereby resign as Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective immediately.

Dated:  November 18, 2008





	/s/: M. Scheive    

	 Marc Scheive
# Iris Oifigiúil C NaN/13 L

| | ISSN 1977-107X |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | Eagrán Speisialta (
  1
  ) |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 5813 Lúnasa 2015 |

ISSN 1977-107X

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

Eagrán Speisialta (
  1
  )

1

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

5813 Lúnasa 2015

---

| | Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Fógairtí |
| | NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN |
| | Comhairle |
| 2015/C /01 | Fógra Cealaithe | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

V   Fógairtí

NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN

Comhairle

2015/C /01

Fógra Cealaithe

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Faoin tagairt C 265 A a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh. |

---

(1)   Faoin tagairt C 265 A a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh.

1

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

V Fógairtí

NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN

Comhairle

| 13.8.2015 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | 1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2015

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

1

---

FÓGRA CEALAITHE

Tá an nós imeachta roghnúcháin CONS/AD/113,

| — | Stiúrthóir, an tSeirbhís Dlí, Stiúrthóireacht 3 (Caidreamh Seachtrach) |
| --- | --- |

—

Stiúrthóir, an tSeirbhís Dlí, Stiúrthóireacht 3 (Caidreamh Seachtrach)

a fógraíodh in Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh
   (1), curtha ar ceal.

---

(1)  IO C 119 A, 14.4.2015, lch. 18.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 73688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20502]

[[Page 73688]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4804-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

Kentucky; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4804-DR), dated July 23, 2024, 
and related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on August 16, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Mary Hernandez-
Marrero, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating 
Officer for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of E. Craig Levy Sr. as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-20502 Filed 9-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```
been suppressed and that the error was not harmless, and we reversed

and remanded. On remand, the parties entered into negotiations; the State agreed to dismiss counts 1 to 12 and 14 to 22 and Carter agreed not to withdraw his guilty plea for counts 23, 24, 25, and 28. The district court entered an amended judgment of conviction on November 15, 2013. This appeal followed.

Carter contends that "in the interests of fairness and on double jeopardy grounds, this court [should] find that all counts were reversed including those to which he pled guilty and that the [Sitate should be precluded from prosecuting him on any of those charges." However, Carter does not cite any relevant legal authority, outside of the constitutional provisions, to support his double jeopardy claim; therefore we need not address this issue. See Maresca v. State, 103 Nev. 669, 673, 748 P.2d 3, 6 (1987) ("It is appellant's responsibility to present relevant authority and cogent argument; issues not so presented need not be addressed by this court."). Nonetheless, we note that this court's prior reversal of the judgment of conviction did not preclude the State from proceeding with a retrial. See Lockhart v. Nelson, 488 U.S. 33, 38 (1988) (recognizing the well-established rule that the Double Jeopardy Clause will not preclude a second trial when an appellate court reverses a conviction due to an error in the proceedings that led to the conviction). To the extent that Carter challenges the validity of his guilty plea, suchchallenges to the judgment of conviction must be raised in a postSUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1540A 

### econviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in

the first instance.' NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738(1).

Having considered Carter's contention and concluded that relief is not warranted, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

J.



### tai..tit...c5LC J. Parraguirre

Saitta
cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge Karen A. Connolly, Ltd. Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

"We express no opinion as to whether Carter could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A 

### e
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00544-CR

CLIFFORD ORAN CRAIG APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Clifford Oran Craig was convicted in 1985 of aggravated sexual 

assault of a child. The jury assessed his punishment at life imprisonment, the 

trial court sentenced him accordingly, and we affirmed his conviction.2 In August 

2009, Appellant filed a pro se motion for postconviction DNA testing in the trial 

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2

See Craig v. State, 704 S.W.2d 948 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1986, pet. 

ref’d).
2

court under chapter 64 of the code of criminal procedure.3 He received 

appointed counsel the next day and filed a supplemental motion in July 2010. 

The trial court denied the motion on March 30, 2011.

Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to 

withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. In the brief, counsel 

avers that, in his professional opinion, this appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s brief 

and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California4 by presenting a 

professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no 

arguable grounds for appeal.5

 This court gave Appellant the opportunity to file a 

brief on his own behalf, and Appellant filed a pro se brief raising two issues. The 

State also filed a brief.

After an appellant’s court-appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on 

the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, we 

are obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record to see if 

there is any arguable ground that may be raised on his behalf.6

 Only then may 

we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.7

 3

See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.01 (West Supp. 2013).

4

386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

5

See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays 

v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.).

6

See Stafford, 813 S.W.2d at 511; Mays, 904 S.W.2d at 923.

7

See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).
3

We have carefully reviewed the record and the briefs filed by Appellant, his 

counsel, and the State. We agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly 

frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record that arguably might 

support any appeal.8

 Accordingly, we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the 

trial court’s order denying DNA testing.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: February 20, 2014

 8

See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Colin W. Stewart, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Nancy C. Broadbent, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                   |  | /s/ Colin W. Stewart   
|Dated: May 5, 2005 |  | Colin W. Stewart       
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Nancy C. Broadbent 
|Dated: May 5, 2005 |  | Nancy C. Broadbent     
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AdvancePCS (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David D. Halbert, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ David D. Halbert


David D. Halbert
Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2002
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40991 Conference Calendar

MODESTO RIOS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus JOHN W. TOMBONE, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:01-CV-338

-------------------- December 12, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Modesto Rios, federal prisoner # 48766-079, argues that the district court erred in dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition alleging that his trial and appellate counsel were ineffective in failing to challenge the manner in which his sentence was determined. He argues that he does not have an adequate postconviction remedy to challenge his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 because this court has previously denied his request to file a successive motion.No. 01-40991 -2- The proper vehicle for attacking errors that occurred during or before sentencing is a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. ReyesRequena v. United States , 243 F.3d 893, 901 (5th Cir. 2001). Under the "savings clause," however, if a prisoner can demonstrate that the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 remedy would be "ineffective or inadequate to test the legality of [the prisoner's] detention," he may be permitted to bring a habeas corpus claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 instead. See id

. (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2255). The savings clause applies to a claim that is based upon a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision which establishes that the petitioner may have been convicted of a nonexistent offense, and that was foreclosed by circuit law at the time when the claim should have been raised in the petitioner's trial, appeal, or first 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Reyes-Requena , 243 F.3d at 904. Rios has failed to demonstrate that his claim is based upon a change in the law resulting from a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision rendering his conduct noncriminal. Thus, he has failed to show that his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 remedies are ineffective and inadequate under the savings clause. The district court did not err in dismissing Rios’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition.
AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF POST APARTMENT HOMES, L.P. FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0001012271
<NAME> POST APARTMENT HOMES, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,787,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                   1,174,934,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             185,068,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,013,773,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    473,683,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 483,813,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,013,773,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            90,680,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               46,540,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,070,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             28,604,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         29,991,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 93,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                29,898,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.09
        

</TABLE>
----

|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |  |
| INDIANA                                        | 35-1544218 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

----

----

----

----

|      |                                                                              |
|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 99.1 | Press Release, dated October 24, 2013, issued by First Merchants Corporation |
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6319** 

AKIL RASHIDI BEY, ex rel. Aikido Graves , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY; PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER; JANE DOE 1, Correctional Officers/Sheriffs in their official and individual capacity; JOHN DOE 2, Correctional Officers/Sheriffs in their official and individual capacity; JOHN DOE 3, Correctional Officers/Sheriffs in their official and individual capacity ; RAY PEREZ, Chaplin, in his official and individual capacity; JOHN DOE 1, Correctional Officers/Sheriffs in their official and individual capacity , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Vi rginia , at Alexandria

. T.S. Ellis III , Senior District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv
- 00102

- TSE

- TRJ )

Submitted : May 29, 2014 Decided: June 3, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Akil Rashidi Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

A k il Rashidi Bey appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ( 2006 ) complaint

. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis

and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bey v.

Commonwealth of Va. , No. 1:13

- cv
- 00102

- TSE

- TRJ (E.D. Va. filed
Jan. 31, 2014 & entered Feb. 3, 2014 ) . We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRM ED

* We conclude that the order is final and appealable as no amendment to the complaint could cure the defects identified by the district court. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066

- 67 (4th Cir. 1993).