alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43933

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

ERIC SCOTT SPOKAS ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 625

Filed: August 1, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Patrick H. Owen , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of four years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, for aggravated assault, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jessica M. Lorello , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
Eric Scott Spokas pled guilty to aggravated assault , Idaho Code § 18

- 901(b),

- 905(b)

. The district court imposed a unified four

- year sentence, with two years determinate

. Spokas

appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Ol iver , 144 Idaho2

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Spokas ’ judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | The
  undersigned, Robert A. Levinson, Chief Executive Officer of Levcor
  International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | the
  Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31,
  2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | the
  information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                         

|    |                          |                                                               
|--- | ------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------
|By: | /s/ ROBERT
  A. LEVINSON
|    |                         
|    | Name:                    | Robert A.
  Levinson                                          
|    | Title:                   | Chairman of
  the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

March 28, 2008

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2013

h0923

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2013

146942(19)

RUDY A. WARE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 146942

COA: 313652

Ingham CC: 12-001138-AA

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY

HEALTH,

Defendant-Appellee.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 30, 2013 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of GCI, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2009; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   Date: May 25, 2010 |   /s/ John M. Lowber |
|---------------------------|---------------------------|
|                      | John M. Lowber            |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer   |

| 1 | Paragraph 3 is omitted since no financial statements are included in the amended filing.  Paragraphs 4 and 5 are omitted since the amendment does not contain an amendment to the Regulation S-K Item 307 and 308 disclosures regarding the evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting. |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132431-32 & (97) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. SBC MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 132431-32 

 COA: 254980 
 MPSC: 00-0011756 

MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,

Appellee,

and 

MICHIGAN PAY TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, 

Appellant. 

___________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for admission pro hac vice of Henry T. Kelly is 

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the September 28, 2006 judgment of the 

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0220 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2007 

 Clerk
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Boeing, DAH Mr. Dan Poblete 9/24/2015 No Rule AD 

ATA Mr. Bob Ireland 10/16/2015 No Rule AD 

Other/ Additional Information: 

10
----

| INDIANA                                        | 35-1544218                        |
|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

|   | o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| Exhibit 99.1 | Press Release dated November 21, 2012 issued by First Merchants Corporation |
|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

| Exhibit No. | Description                                                                  |
|-------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 99.1        | Press Release, dated November 21, 2012 issued by First Merchants Corporation |

----
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 238 

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to James Megellas, 

formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, and currently of Colleyville, Texas, 

for acts of valor on January 28, 1945, during the Battle of the Bulge 

in World War II. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2017 

Mr. JOHNSON (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor 

to James Megellas, formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, 

and currently of Colleyville, Texas, for acts of valor on 

January 28, 1945, during the Battle of the Bulge in 

World War II. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL 

4 OF HONOR TO JAMES MEGELLAS FOR ACTS 

5 OF VALOR DURING BATTLE OF THE BULGE. 

6 (a) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwith7 standing the time limitations specified in section 3744 of 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 238 IS

1 title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation 

2 with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons 

3 who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award 

4 the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to 

5 James Megellas, formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, and 

6 currently of Colleyville, Texas, for the acts of valor during 

7 World War II described in subsection (b). 

8 (b) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor 

9 referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of James 

10 Megellas on January 28, 1945, in Herresbach, Belgium, 

11 during the Battle of the Bulge when, as a first lieutenant 

12 in the 82d Airborne Division, he led a surprise and dev13 astating attack on a much larger advancing enemy force, 

14 killing and capturing a large number and causing others 

15 to flee, single-handedly destroying an attacking German 

16 Mark V tank with two hand-held grenades, and then lead17 ing his men in clearing and seizing Herresbach. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |  |
| INDIANA                                        | 35-1544218 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

----

----
The Honorable Robert N. Armen, Jr., United States Tax Court Judge. 1

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-4144

___________

Larry C. Larue, *

*

Petitioner, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * Tax Court.

*

Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Respondent. *

___________

 Submitted: June 17, 1998

 Filed: June 19, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,

Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Larry C. Larue appeals from the Tax Court’s dismissal of his petition contesting 1

the Commissioner’s deficiency determination concerning his federal income taxes.

After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude

dismissal was proper for the reasons the Tax Court stated. Accordingly, we affirm.

See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00430

- CR

Joseph Wayne Fegurgur , Appellant

v. The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 78328 , THE HONORABLE JOHN GAUNTT , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R F O R C L E R K T O P R O V I D E A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T

PER CURIAM Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and with out merit. See Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se r esponse, and supplied appellant with a form motion for

pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

- 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with
this Cou rt. Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial

court to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide2 written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the app ellate record was provided, on or before January 3 , 202 2

. See id. at 321.
It is ordered on December 2 2 , 2021

.

Before Chief Justice Byrn e, Justices Triana and Kelly
Do Not Publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001012482
<NAME> FARALLON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           16423
<SECURITIES>                                     21202
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10797
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1450
<INVENTORY>                                       6770
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 56935
<PP&E>                                           12325
<DEPRECIATION>                                    9514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   60565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7287
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                       53263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     60565
<SALES>                                          13463
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 13463
<CGS>                                             6864
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     6864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  6805
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1450
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (388)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    182
<INCOME-TAX>                                        64
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                118
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       118
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of Renewal of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Charter.

# SUMMARY:

FAA announces the charter renewal of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC), a Federal advisory committee that works with industry and the public to improve the development of the FAA's regulations. This charter renewal took effect on September 14, 2024, and expires after 2 years unless otherwise renewed.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Aliah Duckett, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591, telephone  (202) 267-7489; email                         *9-awa-arac@faa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Pursuant to section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the FAA is giving notice of the charter renewal for the ARAC. ARAC provides advice and recommendations to FAA on regulatory matters. ARAC is composed of representatives from member organizations and associations that represent the various aviation industry segments. The diversity of the Committee ensures the requisite range of views and expertise necessary to discharge its responsibilities. For ARAC-related documents (                    *i.e.,*                     charter, meeting packet, recommendation reports), visit the ARAC page on the FAA Committee website at                     *http://www.faa.gov/​regulations_​policies/​rulemaking/​committees/​documents/​.*

Issued in Washington, DC, on September 11, 2024.

Brandon Roberts,

Executive Director, Office of Rulemaking.

[FR Doc. 2024-21040 Filed 9-13-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
**Exhibit 10.13**

 

**American DentalTechnologies, Inc.**

 

555 Bear Lane     CorpusChristi, TX 78405

Telephone:  (361) 289-1145    Fax: (361) 289-5554

 

April 29, 2002

 

Mr. Benjamin Gallant1 SchendelPortland, Texas 78374

 

Dear Ben:

 

As you know, it is with regretthat we accept your resignation as an officer and director of American MedicalTechnologies, Inc. (the “Company”) which was tendered at the board meeting onApril 23, 2002.  This letter willconfirm that the Company will honor the terms of its employment agreement withyou which is effective through July 31, 2003 and will pay you all amountsrequired thereunder.  The Company willalso carry you under its health insurance through July 31, 2003.

 

If the foregoing correctly setsforth our agreement, please sign below.

 

With best personal regards,

 
| */s/*   John  Vicker, III |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                     |
| John Vickers  III, Chairman and CEO      |

 

 

Agreed and accepted:

 
| */s/*   Benjamin Gallant |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|
|                               |
| Benjamin  Gallant                  |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 254 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 254

     To amend the Native American Programs Act of 1974 to provide 
 flexibility and reauthorization to ensure the survival and continuing 
                 vitality of Native American languages.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2017

 Mr. Udall (for himself, Ms. Murkowski, Ms. Heitkamp, Mr. Tester, Mr. 
 Franken, Mr. Heinrich, and Mr. Schatz) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Native American Programs Act of 1974 to provide 
 flexibility and reauthorization to ensure the survival and continuing 
                 vitality of Native American languages.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Esther Martinez Native American 
Languages Preservation Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIVE AMERICAN LANGUAGES GRANT PROGRAM.

    Section 803C of the Native American Programs Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 
2991b-3) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(7)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ``10'' and 
                inserting ``5''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking ``15'' and 
                inserting ``10''; and
            (2) in subsection (e)(2)--
                    (A) by striking ``or 3-year basis'' and inserting 
                ``3-year, 4-year, or 5-year basis''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, 4-year, or 5-year'' after ``on 
                a 3-year''.

SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIVE AMERICAN LANGUAGES PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 816(e) of the Native American Programs Act 
of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 2992d(e)) is amended by striking ``2008, 2009, 2010, 
2011, and 2012'' and inserting ``2018 through 2022''.
    (b) Technical Correction.--Section 816 of the Native American 
Programs Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 2992d) is amended in subsections (a) 
and (b) by striking ``subsection (e)'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``subsection (d)''.
                                 <all>
```