alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>                                                     Exhibit 10(xxi)
CONFORMED COPY

                                              August 12, 1997


Mr. W. Marston Becker
Chairman
Orion Capital Corporation
9 Farm Springs Road
Farmington, CT  06032


Dear Mr. Becker:

This letter amends the Letter Agreement dated September 13, 1993 amended on
February 14, 1995 (as so amended, the "Agreement") between Intercargo Corpor-
ation (the "Company") and Orion Capital Corporation ("Orion") with respect to
Orion's ownership of shares of the Company's common stock.  For purposes of 
this amendment, the definitions as set forth in the original Agreement shall
have the same meanings in this letter.

By this letter the Company and Orion agree that the Agreememt is amended as
follows:

1.    The "Percentage Limitation" referred to in Section 5(a) of the Agreement
      is increased to "35%".

2.    The reference to "December 31, 1998 in Section 5(a) and Section 5(b) of
      the Agreement is changed to "June 30, 2000".

3.    All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged.
                                      

                                               Sincerely,


                                               INTERCARGO CORPORATION


                                               By:/s/ Michael L. Rybak
                                                  --------------------
                                                  Michael L. Rybak
                                                  Vice President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

Accepted and agreed to on the date written above.
ORION CAPITAL CORPORATION

By: /s/ W. Marston Becker
    ---------------------
    W. Marston Becker
    Chairman
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6292

GARY N. MCNAMARA, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus
MARTIN P. WASSERMAN, Individually and in hiscapacity as Secretary for the Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene; MARY K. NOREN, Individually and in her capacity as Superintendent for the Eastern Shore Hospital Center; DAVID WILLIAMSON, Doctor, Individually and in his capacity as Director of Forensic Psychiatry for the Eastern Shore Hospital Center; JOEL J. TODD, in his official and administrative capacities as State's Attorney for Worcester County, Maryland; ALL KNOWN AND UNKNOWN PERSONS AS SET FORTH IN THE JOINDER OF THE COMPLAINT; RICHARD ECKARDT, Social WorkerEastern Shore Hospital Center; BURTON ANDERSON, Public Defender Service; PAUL L. STONE, Rights Advisor Eastern Shore Hospital Center;CINDY BASIL, Charge Nurse, Eastern Shore Hospital Center; WALTER GUMBY, Assistant PublicDefender Service, RAUL LOPEZ, Doctor, Psychiatrist, Eastern Shore Hospital Center; RUSSELL P. SMITH, JR., Doctor, Dentist, Eastern Shore Hospital Center; MARTIN BRANDES, Doctor, Psychiatrist, Eastern Shore Hospital Center; ANITA EARP ROBINSON, Honorable, Administrative Law Judge, Defendants - Appellees.2 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95- 2907-AMD)
Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 31, 1996
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary N. McNamara, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Baltimore Maryland; Susan Renee Steinberg, MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & MENTAL HYGIENE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action. All but four of Appellants' claims were dismissed without prejudice. Because such dismissals are generally not appealable, we dismiss the appeal regarding these claims. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).Three of Appellant's remaining claims were dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988), and Appellant's last claim was dismissed after summary judgment was granted to the only remaining Defendant. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no re versible error. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of the remaining claims on the reasoning of the district court. McNamara v. Wasserman , No. CA-95-2907-AMD (D. Md. Oct. 24, 1995, & Feb. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMEDICS
DETECTION INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER
27, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          43,429
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,404
<ALLOWANCES>                                       793
<INVENTORY>                                     11,853
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,967
<PP&E>                                           6,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,199
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,336
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,828
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,403
<SALES>                                         27,445
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,458
<CGS>                                           12,649
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,742
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    84
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 934
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,875
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,125
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,125
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1

<TABLE>
                                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<CAPTION>

                                                   Jurisdiction of
                    Entity                          Organization            Name Under Which Subsidiary Does Business
------------------------------------------------ ------------------- -------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                    <C>           <C>
Alaska United Fiber System Partnership                 Alaska        Alaska United Fiber System Partnership, Alaska United
                                                                     Fiber System, Alaska United

Fiber Hold Co., Inc.                                   Alaska        Fiber Hold Co., Inc., Fiber Hold Company

GCI Communication Corp.                                Alaska        GCI, GCC, GCICC, GCI Communication Corp.

GCI Cable, Inc.                                        Alaska        GCI Cable, GCI Cable, Inc.

GCI Fiber Co., Inc.                                    Alaska        GCI Fiber Co., Inc., GCI Fiber Company

GCI Holdings, Inc.                                     Alaska        GCI Holdings, Inc.

GCI Satellite Co., Inc.                                Alaska        GCI Satellite Co., Inc., GCI Satellite Company

GCI Transport Co., Inc.                                Alaska        GCI Transport Co., Inc., GCI Transport Company

Potter View Development Co., Inc.                      Alaska        Potter View Development Co., Inc.

GCI Cablesystems of Alaska, Inc.                       Alaska        GCI Cablesystems of Alaska, Inc., Rogers Cable

GCI American Cablesystems, Inc.                        Delaware      GCI American Cablesystems, Inc.

GCI Fiber Communication Co., Inc.                      Alaska        GCI Fiber Communication Co., Inc., GFCC, Kanas
   (85% ownership)
</TABLE>
### Veolia Veolia' ' s Waste Analysis Plan s Waste Analysis Plan Dennis J Warchol Dennis J Warchol to: David Ogulei 03/13/2012 02:03 PM History: This message has been replied to.



### David,

I just Fed-x’ed Veolia’s current Waste Analysis Plan to you for arrival tomorrow . Please call if you have any questions.

SERVICE FIRST SAFETY ALWAYS

Dennis J. Warchol EHS Manager

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. Trade Waste Incineration Facility # 7 Mobile Avenue Sauget, IL 62201 618-271-2804 (ext.169) 618-271-2128 (fax) Dennis.warchol@VeoliaES.com www.VeoliaES.com

This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Solutions, LLC is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review , use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please communicate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message and delete it from all computers.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
  
<ARTICLE>             5
<MULTIPLIER>          1
       
<S>                           <C>             <C>                                         
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996     DEC-31-1997                         
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1996     JAN-01-1997            
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1996     JUN-30-1997            
<CASH>                         25,372,575      13,233,404
<SECURITIES>                            0               0                    
<RECEIVABLES>                  97,086,496     113,446,844
<ALLOWANCES>                    7,972,104       5,807,133                          
<INVENTORY>                             0               0                     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              126,184,771     132,012,880                          
<PP&E>                         49,786,683     208,213,967           
<DEPRECIATION>                 10,121,057      15,446,065                           
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                210,595,919     373,723,202                            
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          60,190,531      87,215,944          
<BONDS>                                 0               0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0               0          
<PREFERRED>                             0               0                   
<COMMON>                      111,309,316     111,985,279                                  
<OTHER-SE>                              0               0                  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  210,595,919     373,723,202          
<SALES>                       428,552,436     261,626,752                                     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              428,552,436     261,626,752                         
<CGS>                         252,035,525     152,067,925                                  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 252,035,525     152,067,925                           
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              133,542,536      82,828,601    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0               0                
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              3,514,903       3,073,268                   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                39,960,233      24,824,746
<INCOME-TAX>                   16,394,046       9,384,743     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0               0             
<DISCONTINUED>                          0               0                 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0               0                
<CHANGES>                               0               0                       
<NET-INCOME>                   22,876,735      15,440,003                           
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0.75            0.45                   
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0               0                   
        

</TABLE>
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

FEB 14 2003

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

PAUL L. GOSELAND,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JAY SHELTON; PHILL KLINE,

Attorney General of Kansas,

Respondents - Appellees.

No. 02-3382

D.C. No. 00-CV-3105-DES

(D. Kansas)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before KELLY, BRISCOE, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

Petitioner Paul L. Goseland, a state prisoner appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of

appealability (COA) to appeal the federal district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.
-2-

§ 2254 habeas petition. Having concluded that Goseland failed to file his § 2254 habeas

petition within the one-year grace period recognized for pre-AEDPA convictions, as

required by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), we deny his request for a COA and dismiss the

appeal.

Goseland was convicted of possession of cocaine in 1992. The Kansas Court of

Appeals affirmed his conviction on July 2, 1993, and the Kansas Supreme Court denied

review on September 28, 1993. He filed a request for post-conviction relief in state court

on April 24, 1997, which was denied on December 19, 1997. The Kansas Court of

Appeals affirmed the denial of relief on January 21, 2000, and the Kansas Supreme Court

denied review on March 21, 2000. Goseland filed his federal habeas petition on March

31, 2000. 

The federal district court dismissed the petition as time-barred, concluding the

filing of his request for state post-conviction relief on the last day of the one-year grace

period (April 24, 1997) tolled the running of the limitations period, but left only one day

for Goseland to file his § 2254 habeas petition. Because six days elapsed before

Goseland delivered his habeas petition to the prison authorities for mailing, and Goseland

makes no showing to support equitable tolling, his petition is barred as untimely filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and Goseland’s filings with this

court. We agree with the district court that the § 2254 habeas petition filed in federal

district court was time barred. We DENY a COA and DISMISS the appeal for
-3-

substantially the same reasons as set forth in the district court’s thorough Memorandum

and Order filed August 1, 2001, and its Order filed September 18, 2002. The mandate

shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Mary Beck Briscoe

Circuit Judge
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 260 

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2017 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mr. RISCH, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. 

TILLIS, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. 

INHOFE, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. HELLER, Mr. THUNE, Mr. DAINES, Mr. 

MORAN, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. SCOTT, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. 

JOHNSON, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. SHELBY, and Mr. WICKER) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Seniors’ 

5 Access to Medicare Act of 2017’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 260 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE INDEPENDENT PAYMENT ADVI2 SORY BOARD. 

3 Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protec4 tion and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148), sec5 tions 3403 and 10320 of such Act (including the amend6 ments made by such sections) are repealed, and any provi7 sion of law amended by such sections is hereby restored 

8 as if such sections had not been enacted into law. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131615 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131615 COA: 259463 Wayne CC: 04-006941-01 PAUL ANTHON Y DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 18, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2540 

To provide predictability and certainty in the tax law, create jobs, and 

encourage investment. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 13, 2018 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself, Mr. BURR, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. 

WARNER, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. PETERS, Mr. MORAN, Mr. NELSON, and 

Mr. HELLER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide predictability and certainty in the tax law, create 

jobs, and encourage investment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Motorsports Fairness 

5 and Permanency Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2540 IS

1 SEC. 2. 7-YEAR CLASS LIFE FOR MOTORSPORTS ENTER2 TAINMENT COMPLEX FACILITIES MADE PER3 MANENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 168(i)(15) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subpara6 graph (D). 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

9 December 31, 2017. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 21





P&F INDUSTRIES, INC.





SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT





Continental Tool Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation





Hy-Tech Machine, Inc., a Delaware Corporation


Florida Pneumatic Manufacturing Corporation, a Florida Corporation


D/b/a Universal Tool


D/b/a Pipemaster


D/b/a Berkley Tool








Countrywide Hardware, Inc., a Delaware Corporation





Nationwide Industries, Inc., a Florida Corporation


Pacific Stair Products, Inc., a Delaware Corporation


WILP Holdings, Inc., a Delaware Corporation


Woodmark International L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership


Old Stairs Co. LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company








Embassy Industries, Inc., a New York Corporation





Green Manufacturing, Inc. a Delaware Corporation
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Vicente A. Menchaca v. Insurance Company of the State of

Pennsylvania

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 01122

- CV

Trial court case number: C

- 2017

- 04354

Trial court: 113th District Court of Harris County

Appellant Vicente A. Menchaca filed a motion for en banc reconsideration of this Court’s

November 3, 2020 opinion. The motion for en banc reconsideration is denied

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sh erry Radack

Acting for the Court

En Banc Court consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, Goodman,

Landau, Hightower, Countiss, and Adams.

Date: December 17, 2020
# - Response 

# - Craig Fabian Roben Hackman Da\'c Lotterer Regional Airline Association ATA Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Contacts. With whom outsidethe FAA hasthis ro al been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date National BllSiness Aircr:Jft Assochltion Eli Corti
PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (Dollars in Millions)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                  12 Months Ended
                                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Dec 31,           Dec 31,            Dec 31,             Dec 31,           Dec 31,
                                               1997               1996               1995               1994              1993
                                         ------------------ ------------------ ----------------   ----------------  ---------------

<S>                                        <C>               <C>                <C>                 <C>              <C>
Earnings Before Income Taxes               $     128.6       $      136.0       $      159.8        $     194.3      $      203.3
Fixed Charges                                     79.9               71.6               42.3               53.2              61.6
                                         --------------     -----------------  ----------------  ----------------- ----------------
          Total                            $     208.5       $      207.6       $      202.1        $     247.5      $      264.9
                                         ==============     =================  ================  ================= ================




Fixed Charges
      Interest on debt                     $      75.9       $       62.7       $       37.3        $      47.5      $       55.7
      Interest component of rentals                4.0                8.9                5.0                5.7               5.9
                                         --------------     -----------------  ----------------  ----------------- ----------------
          Fixed Charges                    $      79.9       $       71.6       $       42.3               53.2              61.6
                                         ==============     =================  ================  ================= ================

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                                   2.6                2.9                4.8                4.7               4.3

</TABLE>
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----