alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.5



                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                        FIRST MERCHANTS CAPITAL TRUST III

     This Certificate of Trust is being executed as of December 12, 2001 for the
purposes of organizing a business trust pursuant to the Delaware Business Trust
Act, 12 Del. C.ss.ss.3801 et seq. (the "Act").

     The undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

1.   Name. The name of the business trust is "First Merchants Capital Trust III"
     (the "Trust").

2.   Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the Delaware trustee of
     the Trust meeting the requirements of Section 3807 of the Act are as
     follows:

     First Union Trust Company, National Association
     One Rodney Square
     920 King Street
     Suite 102
     Wilmington, Delaware 19801
     Attention:  Corporate Trust Trustee Administration

3.   Effective. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective immediately upon
     filing in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned being all of the trustees of the Trust,
have duly executed this Certificate of Trust as of the day and year first above
written.

FIRST UNION TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as Delaware Trustee


By:  /s/ Edward L. Truitt, Jr.
     -----------------------------------------------------
     Name:    Edward L. Truitt, Jr.
          ------------------------------------------------
     Title:      Vice President
           -----------------------------------------------



                                       -1-
<PAGE>

ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTEE


     /s/ Michael L. Cox
-----------------------------------------------------
     Michael L. Cox


ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTEE


     /s/ Larry R. Helms
-----------------------------------------------------
     Larry R. Helms, Esq.


ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTEE


     /s/ Mark K. Hardwick
-----------------------------------------------------
     Mark K. Hardwick


                                      -2-
#### The State, ex rel. Sergi, a Taxpayer, Appellee, *v.*City of Youngstown, Appellant.

(No. 28520

Decided March 12, 1941.)

*Mr. D. F. Rendmell,*for appellee.

*Mr. John A. Willo,*law director, *Mr. I. Freeman*and *Mr. Homer E. Carlyle,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the *124reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF UNITED PAYORS &
UNITED PROVIDERS, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      20,494,489
<SECURITIES>                                10,281,185
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,644,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,960,465
<PP&E>                                       3,749,235
<DEPRECIATION>                                 758,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,497,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,224,675
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    35,537,816
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,085,557
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,497,329
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,597,788
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,626,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,287,002
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,136,603
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,150,399
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,150,399
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Eddie BROWN v. STATE.

No. 19960.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1938.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 25, 1939.

Wm. McMurrey, of Cold Springs, for appellant,

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of theft, and his punishment fixed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

This is one of four cases from the same-county, the appeal in all the cases being based upon an alleged discrimination against the appellant in that his race, which was that of a negro, had been discriminated against by an' exclusion of the members of such race from the grand and petit juries in said county; and because of the fact that the grand jury that indicted appellant, and the petit jury that convicted him, had presented for service thereon no person of the negro race.

*t*The statement of facts is the same, and the points raised in the motions are carbon copies of the one in Walter Ryan v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 123 S.W.2d 659, this day affirmed in an opinion by Judge Christian, and in accord with that opinion this judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant, in his motion for a rehearing, insists that we erred in our original opinion in holding that the trial court did not err in overruling his motion to quash the indictment on the grounds that the negro race was discriminated against.

We have again carefully reviewed the record in the light of appellant’s motion and remain of the opinion that the case was properly decided on original submission. See also Mitchell v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 491, 105 S.W.2d 246.

The motion for a rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ray C. Davis, Co-Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 9, 2007



/s/ Ray C. DavisRay C. DavisCo-Chief Executive Officer


*A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to
and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.



---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kelcy L. Warren, Co-Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 9, 2007



/s/ Kelcy L. WarrenKelcy L. WarrenCo-Chief Executive Officer


*A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to
and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
| **Business Combinations (Details)**   | 9 Months Ended |
|---------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Business Acquisition [Line Items]** |           |
| Number of Businesses Acquired         | 1              |

| X                                                                                                                                                                |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_BusinessAcquisitionLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
The number of businesses acquired by the entity during the period.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_NumberOfBusinessesAcquired**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:integerItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
lb/hr lb/day ton/yrlb/hr lb/day ton/yrlb/hr lb/day ton/yrlb/hr lb/day ton/yrlb/hr lb/day ton/yrlb/hr lb/day ton/yrlb/hr lb/day ton/yrPM27 641 20 27 653 35 14 343 20 11 261 21 13 317 30 12 298 21 27 653 35PM1026 646 19 25 602 32 11 267 17 10 248 20 11 271 25 12 285 20 26 646 32PM2.526 635 19 25 599 32 11 262 19 10 249 20 11 271 25 11 256 20 26 635 32NOx608 14597 1036 624 14978 1334 617 14803 1078 597 14318 1124 615 14754 1363 61814839 1126 624 14978 1363CO1091 26172 455 809 19406 540 220 5283 406 235 5647 458 210 5047 466 240 5759 4591091 26172 540VOC388 9323 112 277 6655 121 44 1066 78 46 1094 82 45 1071 87 47 1136 82 388 9323 121Pb5.80E‐03 1.39E‐01 1.34E‐02 6.71E‐03 1.61E‐01 1.73E‐02 7.57E‐03 1.82E‐01 1.40E‐02 7.92E‐03 1.90E‐01 1.51E‐02 7.36E‐03 1.77E‐01 1.62E‐02 8.07E‐03 1.94E‐01 1.51E‐02 8.07E‐03 1.94E‐01 1.73E‐02SO21.80E+00 4.32E+01 8.49E‐01 1.36E+00 3.26E+01 1.02E+00 4.18E‐01 1.00E+01 7.74E‐01 4.38E‐01 1.05E+01 8.34E‐01 4.07E‐01 9.76E+00 8.97E‐01 4.46E‐01 1.07E+01 8.34E‐01 1.80E+00 4.32E+01 1.02E+00H2SO49.89E‐03 2.37E‐01 2.32E‐02 1.15E‐02 2.75E‐01 2.98E‐02 1.31E‐02 3.14E‐01 2.42E‐02 1.37E‐02 3.28E‐01 2.61E‐02 1.27E‐02 3.05E‐01 2.80E‐02 1.39E‐02 3.34E‐01 2.61E‐02 1.39E‐02 3.34E‐01 2.98E‐02GHG3.26E+05 7.82E+06 9.68E+04 2.34E+05 5.61E+06 1.11E+05 4.27E+04 1.02E+06 7.89E+04 4.44E+04 1.07E+06 8.45E+04 4.15E+04 9.95E+05 9.14E+04 4.52E+04 1.09E+06 8.46E+04 3.26E+05 7.82E+06 111286HAPs12 283 13 10 248 13 7 175 12 7 175 12 7 175 12 7 176 12 12 283 13Note:The	Potential	To	Emit	calculation	includes	the	sum	of	emissionsfrom	the	following	emission	sources:*Drillship	Main	Propulsion	Engines	&	Emergency	Electrical	Generator*Cement	and	Mud	Mixing	Dust	collectors*Mud	Degasser	Vent*Painting	Operations*Welding	Operations*Third	Party	Well	Evaluation	Engines*Flowback	Boiler*Boomflare*Condensate	Tanks*Support	Vessels*Drillship	Diesel	and	Jet	Fuel	Tanks*Drillship	Fugitive	ComponentsAnadarko Petroleum CorporationPotential To Emit (PTE) SummaryPollutantScenario1 Scenario2 Scenario3 Scenario4 Scenario5DrillingScenario PotentialtoEmitGasFlowback OilFlowback StimulationVessel Completion WellEvaluationVesselAnadarko	Petroleum	CorporationEGOM	Exploratory	Project	‐	Blackhawk1	of	1PTE
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.20

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

                              DATE: APRIL 30, 2000

         WHEREAS Ampersand Medical Corporation ("Ampersand") is engaged in a
Private Placement Offering (the "Offering") under which Ampersand is offering to
sell 3,333,333 shares of its Common Stock, at a purchase price of $1.50 per
share, to accredited investors.

         WHEREAS such Offering, in accordance with the terms of Amendment No. 1
thereto, is set to expire on April 30, 2000.

         WHEREAS Seaside Partners, L.P., (Seaside), an accredited investor, has
subscribed to purchase 1,333,333 shares of the Common Stock under the terms of
the Offering, such subscription being evidenced by a Subscription Agreement
signed by a duly authorized representative of Seaside and made a part of this
note.

         WHEREAS Seaside has requested that Ampersand except a note payable in
lieu of the total cash purchase price of two million dollars ($2,000,000) for
such subscribed shares.

         WHEREAS Ampersand is agreeable to except Seaside's subscription to
purchase 1,333,333 shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of $1.50 per
share, and is also agreeable to except a note payable from Seaside in the amount
of $2,000,000 in lieu of the total cash purchase price of the subscribe shares.

         NOW THEREFOR Ampersand and Seaside agree to the following terms and
conditions of this note:

         For good and valuable consideration consisting of the issuance of a
certificate in the name of Seaside Partners, L.P. representing 1,333,333 shares
of Common Stock of Ampersand Medical Corporation, the undersigned, Seaside
Partners, L.P., with offices at 623 Ocean Avenue, Sea Girt, New Jersey 08750,
hereby promises to pay to Ampersand Medical Corporation, with offices at 414 N.
Orleans, Suite 305, Chicago, Illinois 60610, the sum of two million dollars
($2,000,000) in cash plus accrued interest computed at the rate of 8% per annum.
Such payment shall be due ninety days from the date hereof and shall be made to
Ampersand in accordance with the instructions in the Subscription Agreement.

o The note may be prepaid in part or in full without penalty.

o The note may be extended in part or in full with the mutual consent of both
  parties.

o Ampersand shall retain possession of the stock certificate until the note is
  paid in full.

o Seaside shall have full voting rights of all shares represented by the stock
  certificate.

o The Subscription Agreement and the promise to pay shall not be voidable or
  cancelable for any reason or circumstance whatsoever.

         SIGNED THIS 28TH DAY OF APRIL 2000, ON BEHALF OF THE DEBTOR:
         Seaside Partners, L.P.

         ______________________
         By: William J. Ritger,         Title______________________

         AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

         Ampersand Medical Corporation

         ________________________________
         By: Leonard R. Prange, President
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2720 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2720

  To codify the outer Continental Shelf blowout preventer systems and 
            well control rule and the Arctic drilling rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 19, 2018

 Ms. Cantwell (for herself, Mr. Markey, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Van Hollen, 
  Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Wyden, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Booker, Mr. Reed, Mr. 
    Nelson, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Carper, Mr. 
Blumenthal, Ms. Hassan, Ms. Harris, and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To codify the outer Continental Shelf blowout preventer systems and 
            well control rule and the Arctic drilling rule.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Coasts Act''.

SEC. 2. CODIFICATION OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF BLOWOUT PREVENTER 
              SYSTEMS AND WELL CONTROL RULE AND THE ARCTIC DRILLING 
              RULE.

    The following are enacted into law:
            (1) Subparts A, B, C, D, E, F, G, P, Q, and S of part 250 
        of title 30, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on 
        February 1, 2017).
            (2) Subparts A, D, and E of part 254 of title 30, Code of 
        Federal Regulations (as in effect on February 1, 2017).
            (3) Subparts A and B of part 550 of title 30, Code of 
        Federal Regulations (as in effect on February 1, 2017).
                                 <all>
```
| INDIANA                                        | 35-1544218                        |
|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

|   | o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

| 99.1   | Description                                                              |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Press Release, dated May 19, 2010, issued by First Merchants Corporation |

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 73741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20515]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12528; No. 2024-03]


Determination Pursuant to the Foreign Missions Act

    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of State under 
the Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. 4301, et seq. (``the Act''), and 
delegated pursuant to Department of State Delegation of Authority No. 
214, dated September 20, 1994, I hereby determine that the 
representative offices and operations in the United States of Rossiya 
Segodnya, including their real property and personnel, are a foreign 
mission within the meaning of 22 U.S.C. 4302(a)(3).
    Furthermore, I hereby determine it to be reasonably necessary to 
protect the interests of the United States to require the 
representative offices and operations in the United States of Rossiya 
Segodnya and its agents or employees acting on its behalf, to comply 
with the terms and conditions specified by the Department of State's 
Office of Foreign Missions relating to the above-named entity's 
activities in the United States.

Rebecca E. Gonzales,
Director, Office of Foreign Missions, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-20515 Filed 9-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4711-11-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0284 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BAGENDABANGA MUGONDOZI,

Defendant and Appellant.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until September 6 2023 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court August 1 2023

08/01/2023
Case Number: DA 23-0284
*OPINION ISSUED FEBRUARY 11, 2009*

#### POMEROY IT SOLUTIONS SALES CO. INC. VS. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

(CC-08-0475)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Ronald R. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks to recover $1,224.53 for five laser jet printers, twenty ink cartridges, and two toners, which it provided to respondent. Claimant did not receive payment for these items.

In its Answer, respondent admits the validity of the claim as well as the amount, *223and states that there were sufficient funds expired in that appropriate fiscal year from which the invoices for these items could have been paid.

In view of the foregoing, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award to claimant in the amount of $1,224.53.

Award of $ 1,224.53.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 24, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00247

- C V

IN THE INTEREST OF K.J.S., A CHILD,

From the 224th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- PA

- 00534 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights which must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R.

J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. The reporter’s record was originally due June 22, 2021, but was not filed. On June 23, 2021, the court reporter filed a notificatio n of late record, requesting an extension until July 6, 2021 to file the record. After consideration, we GRANT the request and ORDER the court reporter to file the record by July 6, 2021

.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of June, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court