alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     3-MOS and 12-MOS Financial Data Schedule for Travis Boats-December 31, 2000
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001012734
<NAME>                        Travis Boats & Motors, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-2001       SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-01-2000       OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-2000       SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1                 1
<CASH>                          3,059             2,971
<SECURITIES>                    0                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                   11,074            11,894
<ALLOWANCES>                    (278)             (278)
<INVENTORY>                     98,799            78,079
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                115,304           95,028
<PP&E>                          29,351            28,794
<DEPRECIATION>                  6,362             5,878
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  149,772           129,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           113,537           90,095
<BONDS>                         11,309            6,015
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0                 0
<PREFERRED>                     0                 0
<COMMON>                        44                44
<OTHER-SE>                      36,191            39,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    149,772           129,647
<SALES>                         24,084            217,718
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                24,084            217,718
<CGS>                           (18,306)          (164,409)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   (18,306)          (164,409)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                (9,079)           (44,971)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              (1,847)           (6,848)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (5,137)           1,464
<INCOME-TAX>                    1,881             (567)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (3,256)           897
<DISCONTINUED>                  0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0                 0
<CHANGES>                       0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                    (3,256)           6,573
<EPS-BASIC>                     (0.74)            0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.74)            0.20



</TABLE>
**Exhibit        23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8        (Nos. 333-105382 and 333-146017) and the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.        333-137575) of Lifetime Brands, Inc. of our reports dated March 14, 2008, with respect to        the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Lifetime Brands, Inc., and the        effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Lifetime Brands, Inc.        included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,        2007.

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

         

Melville,        New York        March 14, 2008
Jay Lasc o

2484 Margaret Dr. Fenton, MI 48430 810.691.5759

A petition to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption part 21 subpart H,§§ 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a),91.203(a) and (b), 91.205(b), 91.215, part 91 subpart E of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The exemption would allow the petitioner to operate the DJI Phantom Vision 2 unmanned aircraft systems (UA S) to conduct aerial photography for real estate, surveying

, and marketing.

The petitioner proposes to operate the Phantom Vision 2 UAS to conduct short duration (>30 minute) aerial photography and videography fo r homeowners, businesses, realtors, home builders, and home

contractor s for real estate marketing and exterior structure photography

.
Operation will use the AMA safety code as a minim um standard for safe operation along with all private pilot safety measures. All flights will be in reasonably controlled environme nts with only crew and client allowed on location during operation.

Jay Lasco is a P rivate Pilot and holds a single engine land and high performance endorsement, along with up to date third class medical certificate. Private Pilot Certificate Number

- 3702017

Jay Lasco has worked in video and film production along with radio controlled devices for over 15 years , and has the skill, experience and wisdom to saf ely operate UAS. This experience will be a benefit to consumers of aerial video and the public b y combining experience in video and film production, along with the safety of operating with minimal exposure to the public for short duration flights.

T he UAS used common ly fits into the model aircraft category and In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, Jay Lasc o ’ s operation of the Phantom Vision 2 UAS meets the conditio ns of Section 333 and will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H

.

Respectfully,

Jay Lasco
#### LOWE v. STATE.

No. 16370.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 10, 1934.

J. W. Ragsdale, of Victoria, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State..

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for assault with intent to murder, punishment being one year in the penitentiary. *

The indictment properly charges the offense. The record is before us without a statement of facts or hill of exceptions. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
GREENWICH CAPITAL


March 31. 2002




Mr. Greg Sullivan
Chief Executive Officer
Ugly Duckling Corporation
4020 East Indian School Road
Phoenix, AZ 85018

Dear Greg:

By  execution  of  this  letter  Greenwich  Capital  Financial  Products,   Inc.
("Greenwich")   hereby  grants  Ugly  Duckling   Corporation   and  its  related
subsidiaries  a waiver of the Debt to EBITDA  Ratio as contained in Section 7.15
of the Ugly Duckling  Corporation Master Loan and Security Agreement dated April
13, 2001 (the "Agreement"), for the quarter ended March 31, 2002.

Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect  in  accordance  with  its  terms,  without  any  waiver,   amendment  or
modification of any provision thereof

Sincerely,

GREENWICH CAPITAL FINANCIAL PRODUCTS, INC.




Ira J. Platt
Senior Vice President













Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc. 600 Steamboat Road Greenwich,  Connecticut 06830
Telephone: (203) 625-2700
Unassociated Document


    Memorandum

    


    Party
      A:
      Hongyuan Pharmaceutical Technology Consulting Service Center of Yuexiu District
      of Guangzhou

    Party
      B:
      Guangzhou Konzern Pharmaceutical Co., LTD

    


    In
      accordance with the approval procedure set forth in the Regulation on Biological
      Product Registration of PRC, in the view that approval procedure of Bacillus
      Calmette-Guerin Vaccine is much different than that of other drugs, and in
      view
      of the high risk in Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Vaccine Transfer Agreement made
      and
      entered by Party A and Party B, both parties agree on the memorandum of the
      aforesaid agreement. Both the Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Vaccine Transfer
      Agreement and this Memorandum are equally legal binding.

    


    
      	
              1.

            	
              Party
                B should pay the deposit amounted RMD 20million to attend the
                bidding;

            


    

    
      	
              2.

            	
              When
                Party A obtain the manufacturing license, Party B may attend the
                bidding;

            


    

    
      	
              3.

            	
              Both
                parties hereto acknowledge that the term of clinical experiment is
                2
                years. Party A should return the deposit amounted RMD 20million if
                the
                clinical experiment can not be concluded;
                and

            


    

    
      	
              4.

            	
              If
                Party B does not win the manufacturing license in bidding, Party
                A should
                fully return the deposit set forth in Article 1 within 20
                days.

            


    

    


    


    


    Party
      A:
      Hongyuan Pharmaceutical Technology Consulting Service Center of Yuexiu District
      of Guangzhou

    Representative:
      Ms Yanli Gu

    Date:
      June 2, 2008

    


    Party
      B:
      Guangzhou Konzern Pharmaceutical Co., LTD

    Representative:
      Mr Senshan Yang

    Date:
      June 2, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMEDICS
DETECTION INC.'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 27,1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                46,352
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                         19,350
<ALLOWANCES>                           1,127
<INVENTORY>                           17,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      87,264
<PP&E>                                10,697
<DEPRECIATION>                         6,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       148,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 40,919
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                               1,932
<OTHER-SE>                           105,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         148,265
<SALES>                               66,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      77,403
<CGS>                                 28,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         34,444
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       7,325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         154
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       934
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       14,655
<INCOME-TAX>                           5,862
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    8,793
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                           8,793
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.47
        

</TABLE>
#### PARADIS et al. v. STATE.

No. 20097.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 22, 1939.

Rehearing Denied April 12, 1939.

*661Rogers & Spurlock, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

On July 13, 1936, an indictment was returned into the Criminal District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, charging G. D. Paradis with forgery in the first count, and in the second count with passing a forged instrument. On the 14th day of August, 1936, Paradis entered into an appearance bond in the sum of one thousand dollars with J. A. Petty and J. E. Petty as sureties. On December 11, 1936, Paradis’ case was called for trial. He failed to appear. A forfeiture was taken on his bond and judgment nisi entered against him and his sureties in the amount of the bond. Upon proper notice a trial was had on the 29th of June, 1938, to determine whether said judgment nisi should be made . final and final judgment had against Paradis and the surety J. A. Petty, but directing that the State should take nothing against J. E. Petty. From this final judgment J. A. Petty appeals.

Upon the trial the evidence developed was in all respects substantially the same as that set out in the opinion in Henry Darwin Caldwell et al. v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 126 S.W.2d 654, and the contention of appellants was the same as in the case mentioned ; that is, that the forfeiture was not taken in'compliance with the statute.

The judgment in the present case is affirmed for the same reasons given in the cause mentioned.

On Appellants’ Motion for Rehearing.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

After carefully re-examining the record in the light of appellants’ motion for rehearing, we are constrained to adhere to the conclusion expressed in the original opinion.-

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION ***     In connection with the Annual Report ofRetail Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (AmendmentNo. 1) forthe fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, James A. McGrady, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.     Dated:August 1, 2006 By: /s/ James A. McGrady         James A. McGrady, Executive Vice President, Chief         Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary * This Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 ofTitle 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. ThisCertification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.    A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 15.01**

 

 

August 9,2004

 

 

Securitiesand Exchange Commission

450Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington,D.C. 20549

 

Commissioners:

 

Weare aware that our report dated July 23, 2004, except Note 16 as towhich the date is August 3, 2004, on our review of interim financialinformation of WellPoint Health Networks Inc. (the “Company”) for the three****and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 andincluded in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJune 30, 2004 is incorporated by reference in its Registration Statementson Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-05111, 333-33013, 333-42073, 333-81687, 333-90791,333-37958, 333-55314, 333-81872, 333-103481, 333-112933, 333-83462 and333-109097), Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-08519 and 333-101475) and Form S-4 (FileNos. 333-73382, 333-106689 and 333-108132).

 

 

Verytruly yours,

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
| PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP     |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          11,741
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,584
<PP&E>                                         776,212
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,811
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 824,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          840,105
<BONDS>                                        826,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,452
<OTHER-SE>                                   (846,562)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   824,760
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,982,768
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,167
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,058,742)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,058,742)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,058,742)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 8, 20 23

No. 04

- 23

- 00028

- CR

IN RE Juan Antonio BELMARES CENICEROS

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

On January 12, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed a motion for stay of the underlying proceedings pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus, which this court granted in part on January 13, 2023. After consid ering the petition, real party in interest’s response, relator’s reply, and this record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). The stay impo sed on January 13, 2023 is LIFTED

.

It is so ORDERED on March 8, 2023

.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

cou rt on this 8th day of March, 2023

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 11374CR , styled The State of Texas v. Juan Antonio Belmares Cenicer os , pending in the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Todd Alexander Blomerth presiding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-27-1997        
<PERIOD-START>                      DEC-28-1996        
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-29-1997        
<CASH>                                    1,168        
<SECURITIES>                                  0        
<RECEIVABLES>                            27,409        
<ALLOWANCES>                                574        
<INVENTORY>                              54,417        
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         98,053        
<PP&E>                                   81,906        
<DEPRECIATION>                            4,449        
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          203,670        
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    99,577        
<BONDS>                                       0        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     5,500        
<PREFERRED>                                   0        
<COMMON>                                      1        
<OTHER-SE>                               43,683        
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            203,670        
<SALES>                                  52,331        
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         52,331        
<CGS>                                    53,501        
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            58,500        
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0        
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        5,725        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (11,255)        
<INCOME-TAX>                                142        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (11,397)        
<DISCONTINUED>                                0        
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0        
<CHANGES>                                     0        
<NET-INCOME>                           (11,493)        
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (15.45)        
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (15.45)        
        

</TABLE>
Dismissed and Opinion Filed December 5, 2023 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-00889-CV 

JAMIEL JAMIESON, Appellant 

V. 

FARNOUSH ZARGARAN, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 469-54284-2023 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Pedersen, III, and Garcia 

Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness 

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated November 13, 

2023, we informed appellant his brief was overdue and directed him to file his brief 

within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the 

dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). To 

date, appellant has not filed his brief or otherwise corresponded with the Court 

regarding the status of this appeal. 

 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), 

(c). 

230889F.P05 

 

/Robbie Partida-Kipness/

ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

JAMIEL JAMIESON, Appellant 

No. 05-23-00889-CV V. 

FARNOUSH ZARGARAN, 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 469th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 469-54284-

2023. 

Opinion delivered by Justice PartidaKipness. Justices Pedersen, III and 

Garcia participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered December 5, 2023
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: February 7, 2006 |  | /s/ RICHARD L. KEISTER 
|                        |  | Richard L. Keister     
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer



20