alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1504 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1504

   To require that, in the questionnaires used in the taking of any 
 decennial census of population, a checkbox or other similar option be 
   included so that respondents may indicate Dominican extraction or 
                                descent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2009

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require that, in the questionnaires used in the taking of any 
 decennial census of population, a checkbox or other similar option be 
   included so that respondents may indicate Dominican extraction or 
                                descent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT RELATING TO CENSUS QUESTIONNAIRES.

    In conducting the 2010 decennial census and every decennial census 
thereafter, the Secretary of Commerce shall include, in any 
questionnaire distributed or otherwise used for the purpose of 
determining the total population by States, a checkbox or other similar 
option by which respondents may indicate Dominican extraction or 
descent.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed, May 13, 2013.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00094

- CV

____________ JAMES STEARNS , Appellant

V.

LISA MARTENS AND STE ARNS POOLS AND SPAS, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09

- DCV

- 169484

ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due March 8, 2013

. See Tex. R. App.
P. 35.1. On March 11, 2013 , this court granted the court reporters request for
extension of time to file the record until April 8, 2013

. On April 10, 2013 , this court granted the court reporter ’ s second request for extension of time to file the
record until May 08, 2013

. To date, the record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record was not filed within the time prescribed in the first orsecond request, the court GRANTS your third request and issue s the following

order.

We order Mindy Hall , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal on or before June 7, 2013

. No further extension will be entertained

. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appell ate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Mindy Hall does not timely file the record as ordered, the Court may issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

P ER CURIAM
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 78 (Friday, April 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 21384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9475]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6975]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Glory of Ukraine: Sacred Images From the 11th to 
the 19th Centuries''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Glory of Ukraine: Sacred Images from 
the 11th to the 19th Centuries,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign 
owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display 
of the exhibit objects at the Museum of Biblical Art, New York, NY, 
from on or about June 17, 2010, until on or about September 12, 2010; 
at the Meridian International Center, Washington, DC, from on or about 
October 5, 2010, until on or about December 3, 2010; at the Joslyn 
Museum of Art, Omaha, NE, from on or about January 2011 until on or 
about May 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to 
be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these 
Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: April 15, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-9475 Filed 4-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73684-73685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20505]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4797-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Minnesota; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Minnesota (FEMA-4797-DR), dated June 28, 2024, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued August 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

[[Page 73685]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Minnesota is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of June 28, 2024.

    Brown, Martin, McLeod, Redwood, and Renville Counties for Public 
Assistance. Itasca, Mower, and Nicollet Counties for Public 
Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance).
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-20505 Filed 9-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          29,099                  29,099
<SECURITIES>                                     5,068                   5,068
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,043                  15,043
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,197                   1,197
<INVENTORY>                                      2,348                   2,348
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,036                  54,036
<PP&E>                                          35,856                  35,856
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,581                  94,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,533                  11,533
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           162                     162
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,987                  80,987
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,581                  94,581
<SALES>                                         18,033                  50,005
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,033                  50,005
<CGS>                                           12,768                  36,804
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,086                  50,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (254)                   (651)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    201                     478
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100                     241
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                101                     237
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       101                     237
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01                    0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01                    0.02
        

</TABLE>
#### TEXAS *&*N. O. R. CO. v. RACHEL.

No. 9030.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

March 29, 1933.

Rehearing Denied April 26, 1933.

John C. North and R. B. King, both of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Perkins & Floyd and O. W. Perkins, Jr., all of Alice, for appellee.

SMITH, Justice.

This is an ordinary action for damages to a shipment of a carload of cattle from Alice to the Fort Worth Stock Yards, where the cattle were sold on a delayed market. Several head of the cattle died in transit, and others were in bad condition upon arrival at destination.

The shipper and another cattleman both testified that the cattle were canners and cutters and were thin in flesh when tendered for shipment, but were nevertheless strong enough and in good enough condition to stand the trip without injury, if moved by the carrier with ordinary care and diligence. Three veterinarians, who examined the shipment on arrival at destination, testified that the animals were so poor and thin and weak and emaciated that they could not have been ship*219ped that distance without injury on account of those'inherent vices. In short, appellee’s witnesses testified in effect that the injuries were occasioned by negligent handling by the carrier, while appellant’s witnesses testified, on the other hand, that those injuries were caused by the inherent vices of the animals. The jury chose to believe the shipper’s witnesses and to disregard the testimony offered by the carrier. It may be that this court, or any other court, or any other jury than that impaneled, would have reached a different conclusion upon the same evidence, but that is unimportant, for, there being material evidence to support both theories, the jury's finding, fortified by the trial court’s approval, is conclusive lipon this -court. Upon these conclusions we overrule the first six of appellant’s propositions. The remaining propositions are without merit, and will be overruled.

The. judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11
                                                                      ----------
               BOSTON COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                   (In thousands, except for per share data)
                                  (Unaudited)
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                       Three months      Six months
                                       ended June 30,    ended June 30,
                                       1996      1997    1996     1997
                                       ----      ----    ----     ----
NET INCOME(LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE - PRIMARY

<S>                                  <C>       <C>      <C>     <C>
Net income(loss)                      $  (70)  $    43  $  122  $   136
                                      ======   =======  ======  =======
 
Primary income(loss) per share:
Average common shares outstanding      4,230    12,755   3,783   12,740
Dilutive options and warrants              -       517       -      338
Other (1)                              5,259         -   5,551        -
                                      ------   -------  ------  -------
 
Average common shares outstanding      9,489    13,272   9,334   13,078
                                      ======   =======  ======  =======
 
Net income(loss) per common share     $(0.01)  $  0.00  $ 0.01  $  0.01
                                      ======   =======  ======  =======
 
<CAPTION> 

NET INCOME(LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE - FULL DILUTION

 
<S>                                   <C>       <C>      <C>     <C>
Net income(loss)                      $  (70)  $    43  $  122  $   136
                                      ======   =======  ======  =======
 
Fully diluted income(loss) per share:
Average common shares outstanding      4,230    12,755   3,783   12,740
Dilutive options and warrants              -       894       -      526
Other (1)                              5,259         -   5,551        -
                                      ------   -------  ------  -------
 
Average common shares outstanding      9,489    13,649   9,334   13,266
                                      ======   =======  ======  =======
 
Net income(loss) per common share     $(0.01)  $  0.00  $ 0.01  $  0.01
                                      ======   =======  ======  =======
 
</TABLE>

(1)Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No.
83, Common Stock and stock options issued during the twelve-month period
preceding the date of the initial filing of the registration statement with an
exercise price below the initial public offering price of $14.00 per share have
been included in the calculation of common equivalent shares, using the Treasury
stock method, as if they were outstanding for all periods presented.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2408 

To prohibit the use of funds for an exhibition or parade of military forces 

and hardware for review by the President outside of authorized military 

operations or activities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2018 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Ms. 

DUCKWORTH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of funds for an exhibition or parade 

of military forces and hardware for review by the President outside of authorized military operations or activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2408 IS

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR EXHI2 BITION OR PARADE OF MILITARY FORCES 

3 AND HARDWARE FOR REVIEW BY THE PRESI4 DENT OUTSIDE OF AUTHORIZED MILITARY 

5 OPERATIONS OR ACTIVITIES. 

6 (a) PROHIBITION.—Subchapter I of chapter 134 of 

7 title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 

8 the section 2241b the following new section: 

9 ‘‘§ 2241c. Prohibition on use of funds for exhibition or 

10 parade of military forces and hardware 

11 for review by the President outside of au12 thorized military operations or activities 

13 ‘‘Funds available to the Department of Defense may 

14 not be obligated or expended for any exhibition or parade 

15 of military forces and hardware for review by the Presi16 dent outside of authorized military operations or activi17 ties.’’. 

18 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

19 at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 134 of such 

20 title is amended by inserting after the item relating to sec21 tion 2241b the following new item: 

‘‘2241c. Prohibition on use of funds for exhibition or parade of military forces 

and hardware for review by the President outside of authorized 

military operations or activities.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of PLM Equipment Growth Fund VI (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the President of the General Partner and of the Partnership, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the Report of the Partnership filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 
 
 
 
 /s/ James A. Coyne
 James A. Coyne
 President of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 March 29, 2004
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 14, 2017

No. 04-17-00182-CR

Darnell ROGERS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR12728

Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After we granted Appellant’s first motion for extension of time to file the brief, 

Appellant’s brief was due on August 7, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). On the due date, 

Appellant filed a second motion for a thirty-day extension of time to file the brief. 

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED; the brief is due on September 8, 2017. No further 

extension of time will be granted absent extenuating circumstances.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of August, 2017.

___________________________________

Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
First Union Capital Markets Group
123 South Broad Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19109-1199
215 985-6000
Fax 215 985-8793


October 22, 1997

Mr. Gary R. Klocek
Controller
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
250 Rittenhouse Circle
Bristol, PA 19007

Dear Gary:

I am pleased to inform you that First Union National Bank (the "Bank") has 
approved, on an uncommitted basis, a $90 million facility for the use of 
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.  The facility is subject to the following conditions:

Sublimit(s):

The facility is divided into two sublimits.  One for $50 million, to be used 
for the express purpose of issuing import letters of credit.  Each letter of 
credit will be risk participated with a bank of our mutual choice on a 50% 
basis for a total letter of credit facility, including the risk participation
of $100 million.  Initially the risk participant bank will be BankBoston.

The second sublimit will be for direct borrowings, not to exceed $40 million.

Advances under both sublimits will be at the Bank's sole discretion.

Letters of Credit:

Fees: As previously negotiated.

                                        -1-
<PAGE> 2

October 22, 1997
Mr. Gary R. Klocek
Page Two

Terms of Advances:

The interest rates, amount, maturity date and other payment terms with
respect to any cash advance will be on an offering basis on terms mutually
agreed upon.

Guarantors:

MELRU Corp., Jones Investment Company, Inc., Jones International LTD,
and Jones Holdings Corp. will continue to guarantee the facility as reflected
in the Guaranty and Suretyship Agreements dated July 26, 1993.

All borrowings under the sublimit of $40 million for direct advances will be 
subject to the terms outlined in a Money Market Master Note dated July 26, 1993.

Please feel free to call me if you have any questions on the aforementioned 
matter.

Best regards,

/s/ Carl E. Goelz

Carl E. Goelz
Vice President

                                        -2-
#### LAXSON v. STATE.

No. 20057.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 21, 1938.

Clyde C. Thomas, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant pleaded guilty before the district judge to the offense of robbery, the indictment alleging that he had been previously convicted of three similar offenses less than a capital felony, and the court found him guilty upon such plea and proof thereof, and assessed his punishment at a lifetime at hard labor in the penitentiary.

The proceedings appear to be regular and the proof satisfactory, showing appellant to be guilty not only of the commission of the instant felony, but also that he had been previously convicted of two other felonies, and we can see no reason for disturbing the trial court’s judgment. It is therefore affirmed.
NO. 07-04-0562-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	DECEMBER 21, 2004

	______________________________

	CITY OF AMARILLO, APPELLANT

	V.

	NANCY ASHTON, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 54,036-A; HONORABLE HAL MINER, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Pursuant to section 51.014(a)(8) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, appellant, the City of Amarillo, filed an accelerated notice of appeal from an interlocutory order dismissing its first amended motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction the suit for personal injuries brought by appellee Nancy Ashton.  Pending before this Court is a joint motion to dismiss the accelerated appeal in which the parties represent they have settled the matter.  

	Without passing on the merits of the appeal, pursuant to Rule 42.1(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  Having dismissed the appeal at the request of the parties, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

						Don H. Reavis

						    Justice