alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF POST APARTMENT HOMES, L.P. FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,783,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                   1,158,059,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             184,020,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             997,560,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    464,726,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 480,251,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               997,560,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            44,566,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,659,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,361,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,156,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         13,093,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 93,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                13,000,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 10.8

                          SCHEDULE OF FACILITY LEASES
                  WHICH ARE SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM OF LEASE
                            ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT 10.7

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                 ORIGINAL
                                                               LEASING           MEDITRUST                            NO. OF UNITS
     FACILITY NAME                 LOCATION                COMMITMENT FEE        INVESTMENT         BASE RENT         IN FACILITY
     -------------                 --------                --------------        ----------         ---------         ------------
<S>                                <C>                    <C>                   <C>                 <C>               <C>
Hamilton House of Grand Blanc (I)  Grand Blanc            $31,867.00 Total      $5,583,530.00            *                 46
                                   Township,               for both Grand
                                   Genesee County,        Blanc facilities
                                   Michigan

Wynwood of Grand Blanc (II)        Grand Blanc                                  $7,603,158.00            *                 66
                                   Township,
                                   Genesee County,
                                   Michigan

Hamilton House of Troy (I)         Troy,                  $33,891.00 Total      $5,694,528.00            *                 46
                                   Oakland County,         for both Troy
                                   Michigan                  facilities

Wynwood of Troy (II)               Troy,                                        $7,694,620.00            *                 66
                                   Oakland County,
                                   Michigan
</TABLE>

* Confidential portions omitted and filed separately with the Commission.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-50119 Summary Calendar

__________________ BENJAMIN EDWIN FORSYTHE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus THOMAS JAMES McKINNEY; ROBBIE J. PROCTOR, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-95-CV-264
- - - - - - - - - - May 30, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Benjamin Forsythe moves this court for in forma pauperis (IFP) status to appeal the district court's order dismissing his civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Forsythe's allegation that prison officials violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing to place him in protective custody is without merit. Forsythe's assertions do not establish that theNo. 96-50119 -2- defendants could have reasonably inferred from his unsubstantiated complaints that he faced a substantial risk of harm from other inmates. See Farmer v. Brennan , 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1979 (1994). As Forsythe fails to state a nonfrivolous issue on appeal, his motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20-0051V

UNPUBLISHED

JANET JACKSON,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: October 4, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner.

Ida Nassar, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On January 15, 2020, Janet Jackson filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) from the administration of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on 

February 6, 2018. Petition at ¶1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit 

of the Office of Special Masters.

On September 30, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) 

Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent’s position is “that petitioner has satisfied the criteria

set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to 

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

Interpretation (“QAI”). That is, petitioner had no relevant history of pain, inflammation, or 

dysfunction in her right shoulder; her pain and reduced range of motion occurred within 

48 hours of receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; her symptoms were limited to the 

shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality 

was identified to explain her symptoms. Id. at 5. 

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: ___2012_______-NM-____118______-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
P.1 

OAR Box 1865 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

21) IV-E-9 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 12/3/2008 9:15:27 AM Sheet 21 of 105 
P.2 

A-83-27 

IV-E-9 

CONTACT REPORT 

Date Dec: 3, iin Originator 

CONTACT BY: TELEPHONE £f MEETING • Other 

NAME, TITLE & ORGANIZATION rferb 6r^ , Technical £,T«c+.r 

AJ^IiaA^/ fefr0|«u/n Afrj-.Vi<rj /Issoci^^ «VI 

ADDRESS & TELEPHONE NUMBER <$0; £« /oo o 

WdsW'^-n tuvy-kC jooj d 

PURPOSE OR SUBJECT (Give project number if appropriate) 

SUMMARY 

d^Aer<£S ca ^ vi^o .olU-Suifur'^e. rcvdujor., but: fta. product is rid Uinj 

{cthd- 3om«- <JCJYS/I« s fo. re^rc/ud/ o J is produced, b ^ ;nc4^«/ic4_vif~ 

„.-.JI refine s i/iL'ck c/o not" tax/C ^dfocksvjfjvjr/ea^o^ Q^^//, ^ 

-/L. ak-l'iS ^ //icreas«- cfovn^fo /?0 oulfot o resfr/c/eol • Curtly , *v.(y 

. L -,0 / J c r o ^ o,( f^uf/ ,5 jSecL fo P^do a rcsrcW 0 ,7. /^UcA <j/ 

dbouC / /o r 1 1 1 £ JJ f 

f k rev.cjtoal 0;/ produc t ;/i .nfcr^ed^k sty* 07- TK rt^e^p,- j c ^ s is 

5e^t fc cok^j -W fL>-<kiecL ca/a^fc d-dc'^-i ^ r oc,wc<. /-jh/v, ^,0/, 

Vai^iU-t peVo/eoKv-. -ffdc^crvAj /-£<- n^ohr Q^soA'/te a^ic( cbtsel fat's. 7K^ 

rovo<"j, /r«jWc€r prjduo f 5". 

fdtiA'2.'' 

ACTION CO 

i 

Distribution:
Exhibit 32.2


ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.


Certification of Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Electronic Arts Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Blake Jorgensen, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Electronic Arts Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that to my knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Electronic Arts Inc. for the periods presented therein.







/s/ Blake JorgensenBlake JorgensenExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial OfficerElectronic Arts Inc.May 26, 2016





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Electronic Arts and will be retained by Electronic Arts and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7563

JOHN PAUL TURNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID S. KUYKENDALL,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CA-95-1020-R)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 18, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v.

Kuykendall, No. CA-95-1020-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 15, 1995 and Sept. 22,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Appellant's motion to consolidate cases is denied.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                          Exhibit 11


                               USCS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                          COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                         (In thousands except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                      Three months ended       Six months ended
                                           June 30,                 June 30,
                                     --------------------     ------------------
                                       1998        1997          1998      1997
                                     --------     -------     --------   -------
<S>                                  <C>          <C>         <C>        <C>
Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding
during the period                      23,356      23,152       23,195    23,124

Common stock equivalents
considered to be outstanding
for the periods presented                 743       1,133          735     1,085
                                     --------     -------     --------   -------
                                       24,099      24,285       23,930    24,209

Net income                           $  6,791    $  5,602     $ 13,060  $ 10,655

Earnings per share
  Basic                                 $0.29       $0.24        $0.56     $0.46
  Diluted                               $0.28       $0.23        $0.55     $0.44


</TABLE>
**Exhibit15.01**

 

 

 

August 14, 2003

 

 

Securities and ExchangeCommission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Commissioners:

 

We are aware that our report dated July 21, 2003 on our review ofinterim financial information of WellPoint Health Networks Inc. (the “Company”)for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 and includedin the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2003 is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(File Nos. 333-05111, 333-33013, 333-42073, 333-81687, 333-90791, 333-37958,333-55314, 333-81872, 333-103481 and 333-83462), Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-08519and 333-101475) and Form S-4 (File Nos. 333-73382 and 333-106689).

 

 

Very truly yours,

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       3,416,928
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,358,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                   317,612
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,631,954
<PP&E>                                     180,734,943
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             647,662,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,698,996
<BONDS>                                    466,400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 151,652,703
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               647,662,530
<SALES>                                     36,803,777
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,803,777
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            35,364,519
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,207,543
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,727,229)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,727,229)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,727,229)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
ACCEPTED

04-15-00333-CR

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

10/23/2015 4:29:05 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 10/23/2015 4:29:05 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                                         EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                THREE MONTHS    THREE MONTHS     SIX MONTHS    SIX MONTHS
                                                    ENDED           ENDED          ENDED          ENDED
                                                  JUNE 30,        JUNE 30,        JUNE 30,      JUNE 30,
                                                    1996            1997            1996          1997
                                                -------------   -------------   ------------   -----------
<S>                                             <C>             <C>             <C>            <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding.........       2,141,250       8,454,690      2,141,250     8,452,190
Incremental effect of issuance           
  of Convertible Preferred Stock
  within one year prior to an
  initial public offering at a price
  below the offering price
  (i.e. cheap stock).........................        937,500            ----        937,500          ----
Incremental effect of issuance of                  
  warrants and options within one                 
  year prior to an initial public offering
  with an exercise price below the
  offering price (i.e. cheap stock) based
  on the treasury stock method using
  the offering price.........................      1,745,769            ----      1,745,769          ----
                                                  ----------      ----------    -----------    ----------
                                                   4,824,519       8,454,690      4,824,519     8,452,190
                                                  ==========      ==========    ===========    ==========
Net loss attributable to common stock........     $ (753,338)     $ (159,856)   $(1,706,998)   $ (600,284)
                                                  ==========      ==========    ===========    ==========
Net loss per share...........................     $    (0.16)     $    (0.02)   $     (0.35)   $    (0.07)
                                                  ==========      ==========    ===========    ==========
</TABLE>
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2697 

To require the awareness campaign regarding the risk of abuse of prescription 

opioids if such drugs are not taken as prescribed to include information 

about dispensing options. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2018 

Ms. WARREN (for herself and Mrs. CAPITO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To require the awareness campaign regarding the risk of 

abuse of prescription opioids if such drugs are not taken 

as prescribed to include information about dispensing 

options. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Unused Medications 

5 Awareness Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2697 IS

1 SEC. 2. AWARENESS CAMPAIGNS. 

2 Section 102(b) of the Comprehensive Addiction and 

3 Recovery Act of 2016 (Public Law 114–198) is amend4 ed— 

5 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘;’’; 

7 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period and 

8 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(4) dispensing options under section 309(f) of 

11 the Controlled Substances Act, as applicable.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION***
     In connection with the Annual Report of Retail Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Heywood Wilansky, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                   /s/ Heywood Wilansky   Heywood Wilansky, President and Chief Executive Officer  April 14, 2005
* This Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act orotherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,except as otherwise stated in such filing.