alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000076063
<NAME> PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   112000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      34000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                272000
<PP&E>                                         1537000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   37000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2560000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           204000
<BONDS>                                        1094000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1000
<OTHER-SE>                                     1127000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2560000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                471000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   191000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 87000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               78000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 193000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     47000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              74000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     74000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Not meaningful since Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company is a wholly-owned
subsidiary.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1997 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF 
OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          35,230
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,045
<PP&E>                                         884,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                (60,240)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,006,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,820
<BONDS>                                        498,139
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           353
<OTHER-SE>                                     420,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,006,082
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,856
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,553
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   483
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,355
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,465
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,257
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,208
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,208
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
THIRD AMENDMENT TO
                       CONTRACT FOR ALASKA ACCESS SERVICES

This Third  AMENDMENT to the CONTRACT FOR ALASKA  ACCESS  SERVICES is made as of
this 27th day of February,  1998, between GENERAL  COMMUNICATIONS,  INC. and its
wholly owned subsidiary GCI COMMUNICATION CORP., an Alaska corporation (together
"GCI") with  offices  located at 2550 Denali  Street,  Suite,  1000,  Anchorage,
Alaska 99503-2781,  and MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS  CORPORATION ("MCI") with offices
located at 1801 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20006.

WHEREAS,  GCI and MCI  entered  into a  contract  for  ALASKA  ACCESS  SERVICES,
effective as of January 1, 1993 and

WHEREAS, GCI and MCI desire to amend the Contract,

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, GCI and MCI agree as follows:


1.  Paragraph  2. B. (2) of the  contract  shall be  deleted  and the  following
    inserted in its place:

         (2) ********  (except for  ********)  shall be charged at the following
             rates per minute in the appropriate periods:

              Date                              Rate in Dollars
              ----                              ---------------
         March 1, 1998                               ********
         January 1, 1999                             ********
         January 1, 2000 & thereafter                ********

There shall be no time of day discount.  ******** shall pay the ********  access
and Alascom interchange charges for ********.

Any query charges associated with the routing of ********  will be  passed on to
********.



[CERTAIN  INFORMATION  HAS BEEN REDACTED  FROM THIS  DOCUMENT  WHICH THE COMPANY
DESIRES TO KEEP UNDISCLOSED AND A COPY OF THE UNREDACTED DOCUMENT HAS BEEN FILED
DEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.]
<PAGE>
2. All other terms and  conditions  of the  Contract  remain  unchanged  by this
Amendment and are in full force and effect.

3. This Amendment will be effective on March 1, 1998

4. This  Amendment  together with the Contract is the complete  agreement of the
parties and supersedes all other prior contracts and representations  concerning
its subject matter. Any further amendments must be in writing and signed by both
parties.




IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties hereto each acting with proper  authority have
executed this Amendment on the date indicated below.

MCI COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY


By: /s/ 

Printed Name:  Donald T. Lynch

Title:  Senior Vice President


GCI COMMUNICATION CORPORATION

By:  /s/

Printed Name:  Richard Westlund

Title:  V.P. Carrier Relations
J. Parker Erkmann

T: +1 202 776 2036 perkmann@cooley.com

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM July 18, 2014

VIA REGULATIONS.GOV & EMAIL

Mr. Robert Finamore

Division Chief Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division Office of the Secretary of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of Blue Jet Sp. z o.o. for Foreign Air Carrier Permit and Exemption Authority: Docket DOT- OST-2014-0026

Dear Mr. Finamore:

I submit this letter on behalf of JetBlue Airways Corporation (“Je tBlue”) in connection with the above-referenced proceeding. On May 27, 2014, couns el for Blue Jet Sp. z o.o. (“Blue Jet”) and JetBlue responded to an inquiry from the Departme nt of Transportation c oncerning the status of the litigation between them, JetBlue Airways Corp v. Blue Jet Sp. z o.o., Case 1:14-cv-01315- GBD (S.D.N.Y.) (the “Litigation”). JetBlue beli eves that recent developments warrant a followup communication.

JetBlue and Blue Jet have reached a settlement in principle of the Litigation. While closing documents have not been finalized, the parties file d a “Joint Notice of Settlement” with the court on July 15, 2014 requesting a 30-day adjournment of all deadlines and appearances in the Litigation. Until such definitive agreement is fina lized, however, JetBlue re tains its objections to the Blue Jet application and reque sts that the Department not act upon it. JetBlue is confident, however, that the definitive agreement can be concluded within the 30-day period and, accordingly, that the definitive settlement w ill resolve JetBlue’s objections to Blue Jet’s application.Mr. Robert Finamore July 18, 2014 Page Two

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM This letter is submitted to advise the Department of developments in the dispute between JetBlue and Blue Jet. It should not be construed as waiving any JetBlue right or legal position in the

above-referenced or a ny other proceeding.

Very truly yours,

/s/

J. Parker Erkmann Counsel for JetBlue Airways Corporation

cc: Gary Garofalo, Esq. Erin Tallardy, Esq. Jason Maddux, Esq. Counsel for Blue Jet Sp. z o.o. (via email) Toby Butterfield, Esq., Frankfur t Kurnit Klein & Selz PC Beth Goldman, Esq., Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC Jonathan B. Hill, Esq., Cooley LLP (via email)

108988164 v1

07/18/14
#### RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS et al., Appellants, v. Jacob T. BRADBERRY, Appellee.

No. 7905.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

Jan. 11, 1933.

See, also, 57 S.W.(2d) 285.

James Y. Allred, Atty. Gen., and T. S. Christopher, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.

J. C. Duvall and A. W. Dawson, both of Fort Worth, and Carl L. Phinney, of Dallas, for appellee.

BLAIR, Justice.

This case is a companion case with the Forwarding Company Case, 57 S.W.(2d) 290, counsel for appellee having briefed them as one case. There are no distinctions to be drawn between the facts alleged in each case, and the rule announced in the Forwarding Company Case controls this case in every particular. .We, therefore, dissolve the temporary injunction granted by the trial court.

Injunction dissolved'.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANDRE ZOLDAN
, Appellant,

v.

THE ENTRADA CONDOMINIUM, INC., INGRID E. WATKINS, PA,

INGRID E. WATKINS, ADAH GAINES, ELIZABETH WATKINS, and

NEXSTAR TITLE AND ESCROW, LLC

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 17

- 3853

[ June 14, 2018 ]

Appeal of non

- final order f rom the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Carol

- Lisa Phillips , Judge; L.T. Case No.

CACE 13

- 010631 Div. 25

.

Kenzie N. Sadlak of Kenzie N. Sadlak, P.A., Miami, for appel lant.

Neil F. McGuinness of Mcguinness & Cicero, Sunrise, for appellee The Entrada Condominium, Inc.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, C IKLIN and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons and vessels that have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons and vessels are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.

# DATES:

                        See                         **Supplementary Information**                         section for applicable date(s).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

OFAC: Lisa Palluconi, Acting Director, tel.: 202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website (                    *https://www.treasury.gov/​ofac*).                

## Notice of OFAC Action(s)

On September 11, 2024, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed below.
      ( print page 75648)          ( print page 75649)          ( print page 75650)          ( print page 75651)    

Lisa M. Palluconi,

Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury.

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[FR Doc. 2024-20992 Filed 9-13-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
*** Deliberative – Do Not Cite, Quote or Release During EO 12866 Review ***Reg Plan Costs and Benefits Table for Lead; Clearance and Clearance Testing Requirements for the Renovation, Repair, andPainting Program;Proposed Rule– SAN[XXXX]; RIN 2070-[XXXX]UnitsCategoryPrimary EstimateLow EstimateHigh EstimateYearDollarsDiscPeriod CoveredNotes/Source CitationBenefitsNot estimatedNot estimatedNot estimated7%Annualized Monetized$millions/yearNot estimatedNot estimatedNot estimated3%Not estimatedNot estimatedNot estimated7%Annualized QuantifiedNot estimatedNot estimatedNot estimated3%Qualitative:The rule would result in IQ benefits for children under age 6 and cardiovascular benefits for adults. There are 809,000 children under the age of 6, 96,000pregnant women, and 7,451,000 other individuals age6 and older who would benefit from the rule.Costs$293 millionNot estimatedNot estimated20087%2010 to 2060Annualized Monetized$millions/year$272 millionNot estimatedNot estimated20083%2010 to 2060Not estimatedNot estimatedNot estimated7%Annualized QuantifiedNot estimatedNot estimatedNot estimated3%QualitativeNot estimatedTransfersNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable7%Federal Annualized Monetized$millions/yearNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable3%From:To:Not applicableNot applicableNot applicable7%Other Annualized Monetized$millions/yearNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable3%From:To:EffectsState, Local, and/or Tribal GovernmentLocalities and Tribes that operate child-occupied facilities and dotheir own renovation work for jobs covered by the rule willincur a small burden, but the rule doesnot have a significant intergovernmental mandate, significant or unique affect on small governments, or have Federalism implications.Small BusinessOver 203,000 small entities impacted: approximately 100 smallgovernments (average impact of0.04%), about 200 small non-profits (average impact of 0.1%), and203,000 small businesses (average impact of0.5%). Of these, 151,000 non-employer contractors (businesses) have estimated average impacts of 0.7% to 2.6%.WagesNot estimatedGrowthNot estimated. Unlikely – rule costs are less than $1 billion per year.Source citation:Economic Analysis for the Proposed Dust Testing and ClearanceAmendments to the TSCA Lead Renovation, Repair, and PaintingProgram for Target Housing and Child-Occupied Facilities, EO 12866 Review Draft, January 2010.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's financial statements included in the Company's Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              3,045
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      59,237
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                     2,322,988
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                2,447,784
<PP&E>                                            974,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                    900,344
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  2,934,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,856,410
<BONDS>                                           979,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        1,318,407
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,220,006)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    2,934,261
<SALES>                                        13,933,545
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,955,858
<CGS>                                          11,934,095
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,436,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                276,854
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (481,030)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (481,030)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (481,030)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.25)


</TABLE>
Stephen Thomas and Svetlana Thomas GeoDrone Robotics, LLC
4301 Stretton Farm Ct. Woodbridge, VA 22192
571.499.0177
703.862.8191 geodroneint@outlook.com

Sept. 12, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Docket FAA 2015

- 2005, Petition for Amendment to Exemption No. 1 2 221

Dear Sir/Madam,

GeoDrone Robotics, LLC. (GDR), received FAA Exemption No. 12221 on July 29, 2015 authorizing GD R under section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to operate its unmanned aircraft system (UAS), the DJI Inspire 1, for various commercial purposes. In this petition for an amendment to Exemption No. 12221, GDR requests to operate two ad ditional UAS’s for the same purposes. The two UAS’s are the DJI Spread Wings 900 (S900) and the 3DR Solo.

The S900 version that GDR has acquired has a maximum takeoff weight of 18 lbs

. and carries an array of uncooled LWIR, SWIR, and Visible Spectrum sens ors. The 3DR Solo is a small UAS that has a takeoff weight of around 5 lbs

. and utilizes advanced avionics and computer controlled navigation. These drone s operate at or beyond the operational parameters of our current UAS, the DJI Inspire 1.

These drone s offer exceptional flight safety characteristics and will be operated utilizing the same safety procedures that GDR currently performs when operating the DJI Inspire 1.

GDR will comply with all of the conditions and limitations imposed in Exemption 12221 except that condition/limitation number 1 will need to be revised to include the DJI S900 and 3DR Solo UAS’s . The list of “operating documents” will also need to be revised to include operating manuals for both of these UAS ’ s . Due to file sizes, these do cuments can be provided separately or by hyperlink if requested by the FAA. Other than these revisions, there will be no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public safety that were the basis for the initial grant of exemption.

Because the req uested amendment would not set any precedent or otherwise raise any new issues, GDR respectfully requests the FAA to determine that good cause exists to grant the requested amendment by summary

means.
Sincerely,

Stephen Thomas (CEO)
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
127860 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 127860 COA: 256762 Wayne CC: 85-005904 RICHARD SANDERS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e December 22, 2004 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1121 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2005

Clerk
Exhibit 31.1



I, Paul J. Varello, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2015 of Sterling Construction Company, Inc.; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.





|Dated April 4, 2016 | /s/ Paul J. Varello     | 
|------------------- | ----------------------- | 
|                    | Paul J. Varello         | 
|                    | Chief Executive Officer |