alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
E X H I B I T   1 1

                STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          Three Months Ended September 30     Nine Months Ended September 30
(Thousands of dollars and shares)                 1996        1995                   1996     1995 
<S>                                             <C>         <C>                    <C>      <C>       
Net income                                      $   22      $  348                 $  714   $  368

Weighted average shares of Common
  Stock outstanding                             16,647      15,847                 16,411   15,657        

Shares of Common Stock issuable upon
  conversion of Convertible Preferred Stock      7,423       7,021                  7,423    6,765 

Shares of Common Stock issuable upon
  exercise of employee stock options             2,274           -                  2,022        -        

Total shares of Common Stock and
  Common Stock equivalents                      26,344      22,868                 25,856   22,422        

Net income per share                            $ .001      $ .015                 $ .028   $ .016       
                                                                                                          
<FN>
(1)     Primary and fully diluted per share earnings are substantially the same for each period presented.
</FN>
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CertificationPursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

I,  Javier O. Lamoso, the President of ClearComm,L.P., certify that (i) the September 30, 2005 10-Q Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the September 30,2005 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of ClearComm, L.P.

 

 
|   | /s/ Javier O. Lamoso   |   |
|--------|------------------------|--------|
|   | Javier O. Lamoso       |   |
|   | President              |   |
|   | November 14, 2005 |   |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Defense Acquisition Regulations System

          - 48 CFR Parts 201 and 204
          - [Docket DARS-2024-0001]

# AGENCY:

Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD).

# ACTION:

Final rule; technical amendment.

# SUMMARY:

DoD is amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to make needed editorial changes.

# DATES:

Effective October 1, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Jennifer D. Johnson, Defense Acquisition Regulations System, telephone 703-717-8226.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This final rule amends the DFARS to make needed editorial changes to update an email address at DFARS 201.170 and to remove DFARS subpart 204.70, Procurement Acquisition Lead Time. This subpart consisted of a pointer to DFARS Procedures, Guidance, and Information, which is no longer needed.

# List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 201 and 204

      - Government procurement

Jennifer D. Johnson,

Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

Therefore, the Defense Acquisition Regulations System amends 48 CFR parts 201 and 204 as follows:

1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 201 and 204 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.

# PART 201—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM

201.170

2. Amend section 201.170 in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) by removing “ *osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.dpc-pcf@mail.mil*                            ” and adding “                            *osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.dpc-pcf-peer-reviews@mail.mil*                            ” in its place.                        

# PART 204—ADMINISTRATIVE AND INFORMATION MATTERS

# Subpart 204.70 [Removed and Reserved]

3. Remove and reserve subpart 204.70, consisting of section 204.7001. 

[FR Doc. 2024-21096 Filed 9-25-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-FR-P
#### BRINKLEY v. STATE.

No. 11243.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.

April 9, 1932.

*517Jed C. Adams, of Dallas, for appellant.

Wm. McCraw, Dist. Atty., Tom 0. Clark, and S. B. Lewis, all of Dallas, for the State.

LOONEY, J.

This appeal is from an order of the district court overruling a plea of privilege. Ap-pellee moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appeal was not perfected by filing appeal bond within the time prescribed by statute. The record discloses that the judgment of court overruling the plea of privilege was announced and docket entry thereof made by the court December 17, 1931, but was not entered upon the minutes of court until December 24, 1931. The appeal bond was approved and filed January 20,1932, more than thirty days after the pronouncement of the judgment, but less than thirty days from its entry in the minutes. The rule is now well settled that a judgment is not ripe for direct appeal (under article 2253) until it is actually entered upon the minutes of court [see Gilmore v. Ladell (Tex. Civ. App.) 34 S.W.(2d) 919, and authorities cited], although the time within which an appeal by writ of error (under article 2255) must be taken is reckoned, from the date of final judgment proper, that is, from its pronouncement as distinguished from the entry [see Kittrell v. Fuller (Tex. Civ. App.) 2S1 S. W. 575]; and the time within which appeals, from interlocutory judgments in receiver-ships (under article 2250) and injunction matters (under article 4GG2) must be taken is reckoned by express statutory provisions from the date the judgment is entered of record.

Subsequent to the proceedings above detailed and during the term, the court, on January 30, 1932, entered a corrected judgment from which appellant duly perfected appeal. In situations identical with the one presented by this record, our courts have repeatedly held that the effect of entering a later judgment was to vacate the former, and that the last or corrected judgment entered was the one presented for review. See Luck v. Hopkins, 92 Tex. 426, 49 S. W. 360; Hall V. Read, 28 Tex. Civ. App. 18, 66 S. W. 809; Gray v. Chapman (Tex. Civ. App.) 74 S. W. 564; Ripy v. Redwater Lumber Co., 48 Tex. Civ. App. 311, 106 S. W. 474.

The motion of the state to dismiss the appeal is overruled.

Overruled.
#### MOSS v. THOMPSON.

No. 3022.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

May 31, 1934.

C. H. Machen, of Dallas, for appellant

Parley Reasonover, of Dallas, for appellee.

HIGGINS, Justice.

H. S. Moss is the owner of an eight-sixteenths interest in an oil well; John D. Anderson owns a five-sixteenths interest therein ; and R. E. Thompson is the receiver of a three-sixteenths interest in such well. Moss operated the well under an agreement that he should be liable for operating costs and expenses according to his interest. He filed this suit in the court where the receivership is pending setting up a claim against the receiver for $915.37, the receiver’s share of such operating costs and expenses. The claim is itemized.

The receiver answered, in general terms, denying the justice and correctness of every item set forth in the claim. The receiver also pleaded in set-off the sum of $1,000, the alleged value of a derrick delivered by the receiver to Moss and alleged to have been converted by Moss.

Separate findings and conclusions were not filed by the court, but the judgment entered shows various items of the charges allowed aggregating $413.26. All other items were disallowed.

The judgment further discloses that the receiver was allowed to set off against the claim of Moss the sum of $51, the receiver’s three-sixteenths interest in the sum of $275, for which Moss had sold said derrick. The court also charged against Moss one-half of the sum of $246, the value .of a drill stem appropriated by Moss, which stem was owned jointly by Moss and the receiver: The court also charged up against Moss various other sums which the court found to be owing by Moss to the receiver. The total of all the sums charged against Moss is $422.38, which sum the court set off against Moss’ claim and rendered judgment that he take nothing against the receiver.

Opinion.

There are no pleadings which would authorize any set-off against the claim of Moss except said sum of $51, the receiver’s interest in the amount for which the derrick was sold.

The court erred in allowing the set-offs not pleaded. The error in so doing is apparent upon the face of the pleadings and judgment, and therefore fundamental.

The plaintiff’s testimony shows the justice and correctness of the claim sued upon as to practically all of the items thereof, and in the absence of any evidence impeaching the justice and correctness of the items, the same should have been allowed. Appellee says the evidence was conflicting upon the issue and the finding of the court controls. The brief points out no evidence to support the action of the court in disallowing any of the items.

Reversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FILM ROMAN, INC., AS OF AND FOR THE THREE
MONTH AND NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,403,895               3,403,895
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  677,538                 677,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                 27,819,482              27,819,482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,557,097               1,557,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                 725,941                 725,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,629,804              23,629,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                      1,230,000               1,230,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  7,474,400               7,474,400
<COMMON>                                           700                     700
<OTHER-SE>                                   (691,345)               (691,345)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,629,804              33,629,804
<SALES>                                     11,108,312              24,824,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,108,312              24,824,010
<CGS>                                       10,245,746              23,172,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,245,746              23,172,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,002,187               2,596,659
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,339                  94,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (108,282)               (850,453)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (108,282)               (850,453)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (108,282)               (850,453)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)                  (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         1013267
<NAME>                        CleanComm, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                1
<CURRENCY>                       U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                    JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1.000
<CASH>                             14,954,800
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                         323,916
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                         9,649,691
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   25,400,758
<PP&E>                              2,593,049
<DEPRECIATION>                        127,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    127,364,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              46,235,851
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                           71,075,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      127,364,624
<SALES>                               387,171
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      387,171
<CGS>                                 597,937
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    6,054,121
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    362,332
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (5,977,051)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                      (5,977,051)
<EPS-BASIC>                           2,114
<EPS-DILUTED>                           2,114



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>                                1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                     12,241
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     28,639
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           9,127
<TRADING-ASSETS>                           0 
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                33,931
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     1,233
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       1,237
<LOANS>                                    278,073
<ALLOWANCE>                                3,852
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             379,694
<DEPOSITS>                                 328,727 
<SHORT-TERM>                               6,047
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        3,810
<LONG-TERM>                                3,200 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   2,838
<OTHER-SE>                                 35,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             379,694
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            6,715 
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          526
<INTEREST-OTHER>                           584 
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           7,825
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         3,551
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         3,704  
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      4,121
<LOAN-LOSSES>                              65
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                         208
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            3,135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1,943
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 1,943
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               1,339
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .44 
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                              4.74
<LOANS-NON>                                 3,227
<LOANS-PAST>                                356
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                            877
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            3,852
<CHARGE-OFFS>                               205 
<RECOVERIES>                                140
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           3,852
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        3,852 
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                         0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                     3,852
        

</TABLE>
#### RILEY v. STATE.

No. 18176.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 8, 1936.

Reynold M. Gardner and S. F. Rose, both of Amarillo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft of hogsthe punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

No bills of exception are brought forward.

Appellant contends the evidence is insufficient. We are unable to agree with him. About the 5th day of July, 19.35, Howard Rhoades lost thirty-three hogs from his pens in Deaf Smith county, Tex. The following day he observed tracks of men around the pens. He also found the tracks of an automobile. He testified: “It looked as though it might have been a six wheel trailer — six wheel truck.” Another witness testified that the tracks showed that there were four wheels on the rear of *152the truck, “two on each side close together.” On the 6th of July, 193S, according to the testimony of a state highway patrolman of the state of New Mexico, he saw appellant and another mqn near Raton, N. M., driving a truck which was loaded with thirty hogs. On the same day appellant and his companions sold the hogs to Gilbert Sefton of Raton, N. M., who testified that he purchased thirty-two hogs from appellant’s companion, and that appellant was present at the time. On the day he bought the hogs Sefton sent them to Pueblo, Colo., and sold them to Nicldes Packing Company. The owner recovered about twenty of said hogs from said company. The truck in which appellant and his. companions traveled to New Mexico was equipped with six Sieberling tires. An officer testified that he measured the tracks found at the pens from, which the hogs had been taken. He said in effect that in size and character they were the same as those made by the truck.

Appellant did not testify, but introduced witnesses whose testimony raised the issue of alibi.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

MORROW, P. J., absent.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 148 (Thursday, August 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46671-46672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18558]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8402]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Haiti

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L. 112-74) (``the Act''), as carried forward by the Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (Div. F, Pub. L. 113-6), and Department of 
State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it 
is important to the national interest of the United States to waive the 
requirements of Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act and similar provisions of 
law in prior year Acts with respect to Haiti and I hereby waive this 
restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of

[[Page 46672]]

Justification shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination 
shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 12, 2013.
William J. Burns,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-18558 Filed 7-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ICG COMMUNICATIONS,  INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE THREE  MONTHS  ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999 
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1999 
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1999 
<CASH>                                            291,876 
<SECURITIES>                                       46,660 
<RECEIVABLES>                                     216,057 
<ALLOWANCES>                                       18,355 
<INVENTORY>                                         3,223 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  585,597 
<PP&E>                                          1,282,273 
<DEPRECIATION>                                    215,106 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,877,259 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             171,266 
<BONDS>                                         1,745,181 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             478,924 
<PREFERRED>                                             0  
<COMMON>                                              468 
<OTHER-SE>                                       (518,580) 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,877,259 
<SALES>                                                 0  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  129,519 
<CGS>                                                   0  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      70,176 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   87,016 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    3,651 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 47,441 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (71,513) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (86,317)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   193,029 
<CHANGES>                                               0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      106,712 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        2.29 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0 
                                              


</TABLE>