alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company.  |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                  February                  6, 2007 |   |                                                             |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                     | By:    |  /s/                  Konstantin Tsirulnikov                |   |
|                                                     |   | Konstantin                  Tsirulnikov                          |   |
|                                                     |   | Chairman,                  President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                     9
<MULTIPLIER>                               1000
<CURRENCY>                         U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                       JUL-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1
<CASH>                                      167
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                    3,043
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                    5,311
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                      5,286
<LOANS>                                  24,751
<ALLOWANCE>                                 120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           34,055
<DEPOSITS>                               26,053
<SHORT-TERM>                                 72
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         104
<LONG-TERM>                                 718
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                6,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           34,055
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             993
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           176
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             77
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           1246
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          740
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          762
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       484
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 9
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (46)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  (46)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                (32)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.07)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                             7.53
<LOANS-NON>                                   0
<LOANS-PAST>                                 73
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                              0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            117
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 0
<RECOVERIES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           120
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        120
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                     120
        


</TABLE>
#### CRAVEN v. STATE.

No. 20864.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 28, 1940.

Rehearing Denied April 17, 1940.

F. H. Woodard, of Corpus Christi,. for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of. Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the County Court of Nueces County for engaging as a plumber in the city of Corpus Christi, Texas, without a license, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $25.

The evidence heard upon the trial is not-brought forward for review. No complaints of the rulings of the trial court have been presented by bills of exception,, and we have ■ been favored with no brief' in the case.

Upon the record before us, no reversible error has been discovered, and the.judgment is therefore affirmed.
We have issued our report dated  February 9, 2001,  accompanying  the  financial
statements included in the Annual Report of Interlott Technologies, Inc. on Form
10-K  for  the  year  ended   December  31,  2000.  We  hereby  consent  to  the
incorporation  by reference  of said report in the  Registration  Statements  of
Interlott Technologies, Inc. on Form S-8 (No. 33-78092 and No. 333-39374).


                                     /s/GRANT THORNTON LLP
                                     --------------------------------------
                                     Grant Thornton LLP
                                     Certified Public Accountants

Cincinnati, Ohio
March 27, 2001
EX-10.3









EXHIBIT 10.3




November 10, 2008




Advanced Viral Research Corp.

6 Executive Plaza, Suite 283

Yonkers, New York 10701





     Re: Employment Agreement



To Whom It May Concern:




This is to set forth our agreement regarding the payment of my salary. Reference is made to my
Employment Agreement dated as of December 3, 2007 (the “Agreement”). By executing this letter
agreement, we agree that the following terms and conditions shall be incorporated into the
Agreement effective as of August 8, 2008 notwithstanding any other provisions in the Agreement to
the contrary.




From the two week pay period ending August 8, 2008 through the two week pay period ending
October 3, 2008, the obligation of the Company to pay my base salary as well as any other cash
amounts shall be deferred until the Company (i) acquires net proceeds of at least $3.0 million
from the sale of the Company’s assets or securities; or (ii) consummates a merger transaction
with the surviving entity having at least $3.0 million in cash availability (the “Triggering
Event”).




From the two week pay period ending October 17, 2008 until the Triggering Event, the Company
shall pay 40% of my base salary and all other cash amounts obligated to be paid by the Company
to me under the Agreement (e.g. $200,000 per annum) shall be deferred.




Upon the occurrence of the Triggering Event, all amounts deferred hereunder shall be paid to me
in one lump sum.



Except as otherwise specifically provided in this letter agreement, the terms of the Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect.



This letter agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which taken together
shall constitute one letter agreement.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

 	 
	 	/s/ Dallas Hughes
 	 
	 	Dallas Hughes 	 
	 	 	 
	 



Agreed and Acknowledged as of August 8, 2008




ADVANCED VIRAL RESEARCH CORP.




By: /s/ Stephen Elliston, Chief Executive Officer and President
Exhibit No. 23.2


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 33-72958) on Form S-3 of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company of our report
dated January 16,1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Panhandle
Eastern Pipe Line Company as of December 31, 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of income, common stockholder's equity, and cash flows for the years
ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, which report appears in the December 31, 1997
annual report on Form 10-K of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company.


KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Houston, Texas
March 30, 1998




<PAGE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LACEY MARK SIVAK, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

JAY CHRISTENSEN; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-35243 

D.C. No. 1:19-cv-00514-DCN 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 17, 2021**

Before: FERNANDEZ, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Idaho state prisoner Lacey Mark Sivak appeals pro se from the district 

court’s judgment dismissing for failure to comply with a court order his action 

alleging federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review 

for an abuse of discretion a district court’s dismissal of an action for failure to 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-35243 

comply with a court order. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.

1992). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Sivak’s action 

after warning him that failure to pay the filing fee or apply for in forma pauperis 

status would result in dismissal. See id. at 1260-63 (setting forth factors for 

determining whether a pro se action should be dismissed for failure to comply with 

a court order and requiring “a definite and firm conviction” that the district court 

“committed a clear error of judgment” in order to overturn such a dismissal

(citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (an 

action may proceed without the payment of filing fees only upon granting of in 

forma pauperis status).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

All pending motions and requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.
#### HEUGATTER v. MARSHALL.

No. 13043.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Port Worth.

Jan. 20, 1934.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 24, 1934.

T. H. Yarbrough, of Bowie, for appellant.

Benson & Benson, of Bowie, for appellee.

LATTIMORE, Justice.

This is a contest of a common school district trustee election. Appellant was, on the date of election, April 1, 1933, a school trustee whose election term expired on that date. The school trustees posted the proper notices of the election and appointed three election judges, article 2745, R. S., as amended by Acts 1929 (2d Called Sess.), c. 2 (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 2745) and article 2746, R. S., one of whom was appellee. No pérson filed as a candidate as prescribed by article. 2746a, R. S., but it was known for about two weeks before the election that appellee was “being run” for school trustee by some of the citizens of the district.

On the day of the election, the three judges met and named appellee “presiding judge” of the election, and he as such and the other two conducted the election. One of the other election judges wrote on a blackboard in the voting room the names of appellant and ap-pellee as candidate to be voted upon. Appel-lee received 25 votes for the office and all others combined received 6. Appellee was duly certified as the elected trustee and took office promptly.

Many interesting questions suggest themselves, but' we believe the facts render any decision of them unnecessary. We can see nothing illegal in the fact that appellee served as election judge. At least twenty days in advance he is appointed election judge; four or five days later a citizen suggests, wholly without his instigation as far as the records show, that he should be elected trustee. His name is not filed for the ballot. He cannot prevent his name being written into the ballot, as was done in each of the 25 votes he received. As an election official, he should not attempt to do so. The record is silent of any act of his in influencing voters during the election.

The writing of the names on the blackboard was improper, but we do not feel that there was anything vicious or depraved about it, nor is there any suggestion in the statement of facts that it had any effect on the casting of the ballots. Appellant’s name was also written there. This did not excuse the other, but the results of the election suggest that such publication did not name the winner.

We confess to a wish that the decisions of this state had given more attention to the rights of the people who set up the government, and less to complaints of those who seek to become by election servants of that organized society; but such wish does not furnish us excuse to approve such a tempest in this teapot.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                          5

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             1,300,000
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1,348,000
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     1,348,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              960,000
<BONDS>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           15,849,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                         (15,461,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       1,348,000
<SALES>                                            6,576,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   6,576,000
<CGS>                                              3,521,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      6,526,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (17,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (134,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (101,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       49,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (52,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     (1,169,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (1,221,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.21)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 3.3

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                             ADVANCE PARADIGM, INC.

     Advance Paradigm, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT:

     FIRST: The corporation was originally incorporated under the name
Advance Pharmacy Services, Inc. and filed its original Certificate of
Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Delaware on July 27, 1993. The
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation was filed on October 7, 1996
and a Certificate of Amendment was filed on October 11, 1996.

     SECOND: The first paragraph of Article IV of the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with
the following:

          "The aggregate number of shares of capital stock which the Company
          shall have authority to issue is 55,000,000 shares of capital stock,
          consisting of 50,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per
          share and five million (5,000,000) shares of which is Preferred Stock,
          par value of $0.01 per share. Unless specifically provided otherwise
          herein, the holders of such shares shall be entitled to one vote for
          each share held in any stockholder vote in which any of such holders
          is entitled to participate."


     THIRD: The foregoing amendment was declared advisable and proposed to the
corporation's stockholders by resolutions adopted by unanimous written consent
of the Board of Directors dated October 8, 1999.

     FOURTH: Pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, the stockholders
of said corporation approved the amendment at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
held on November 10, 1999.

     FIFTH: Said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.


<PAGE>   2





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Advance Paradigm, Inc. has caused this certificate to
be signed by David D. Halbert, its President and Chief Executive Officer, and
Danny Phillips, its Secretary, this 11th day of November, 1999.


                                           ADVANCE PARADIGM, INC.



                                           By  /s/ DAVID D. HALBERT
                                               ------------------------------
                                           David D. Halbert
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


ATTEST:

/s/ DANNY PHILLIPS
---------------------------
Danny Phillips
Secretary
Exhibit 10.4


AMENDMENT


THIS AMENDMENT
(“Amendment”), dated November 3, 2008, is to the ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
(“Agreement”) dated June 1, 2008 by and between Lux Digital Pictures, Inc
(“Buyer”) and RTV Media Corp (“Seller”), and is made to modify the Agreement as
follows:


	
 

	
 


	
(1)

	
The Purchase
  Price for the Assets, as more fully described in paragraph five (5) of the
  Agreement, is hereby amended and changed to a total consideration of
  2,000,000 shares of Buyer’s common stock (“New Purchase Price”).


	
 

	
 


	
(2)

	
Seller
  hereby agrees to, immediately upon the request of Buyer, to return Buyer’s
  previously issued common stock certificate #3 and exchange it for a new stock
  certificate from Buyer representing the consideration of the New Purchase
  Price.


	
 

	
 


	
(3)

	
All other
  terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Buyer and Seller have executed the Amendment as of the date
first above written:


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
BUYER:

	
 

	
SELLER:


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Lux Digital
  Pictures, Inc

	
 

	
RTV Media Corp


	
Ingo Jucht,
  CEO

	
 

	
Michael
  Nelson,


	
 

	
 

	
Managing
  Director
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OSCAR SANCHEZ

- ORDAZ,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 16

- 70147

Agency No. A095

- 736

- 873

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 3, 2020 * *

Before: SILVERMAN , CHRISTEN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Oscar Sanchez

- Ordaz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigratio n Appeals’ order affirming without opinion an

immigration judge’s decision denying cancellation of removal. We dismiss the

petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Sanchez

- Ordaz’s sole, unexhausted

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 16

- 70147

contention that his conviction would be elig ible for Federal First Offender Act

treatment. See Zara v. Ashcroft

, 383 F.3d 927, 931 (9 th Cir. 2004) (“the

exhaustion requirement applies to ‘streamlined’ cases”) ; Garcia

- Cortez v.

Ashcroft , 366 F.3d 749, 753 (9th Cir. 2004) (“ The Notice of Appeal is sufficiently

specific if the alien explains in a short and plain statement exactly how and why

the IJ erred. . . . [C]onclusory or generalized statements that the IJ abused his

discretion or wrongfully ordered the alien ’ s removal fail to meet the specifici ty

requirement, because they do not meaningfully direct the BIA in its review.”)

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ORANGE AND
ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      899,643
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     17,006
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         222,725
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       174,256
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,313,630
<COMMON>                                        68,271
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      127,519
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            192,060
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 387,850
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     43,241
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           281,622
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  82,370
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   78,203
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        1,390
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 438,954
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,313,630
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      925,050
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            24,820
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     821,589
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     846,409
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         78,641
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (1,244)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  77,397
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        31,094
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,303
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      3,024
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   43,279
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        35,227
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       24,221
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          82,329
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>