alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                 JURISDICTION OF
                              NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                  INCORPORATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------  ----------------
<S>                                                                              <C>
Outdoor Systems Painting, Inc..................................................    Arizona
OS Baseline, Inc...............................................................    Arizona
OS Advertising of Texas Painting, Inc..........................................     Texas
Decade Communications Group, Inc...............................................    Colorado
Bench Advertising Company of Colorado, Inc.....................................    Colorado
New York Subways Advertising Co., Inc..........................................    Arizona
Mediacom Inc...................................................................     Canada
</TABLE>
June 3, 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

SIEMENS ENERGY, INC. F/K/A SIEMENS POWER GENERATION, INC.

, Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00863

- CV V.

NATION AL UNION FIRE INSURA NCE COMPANY OF PITTS BURG, PENNSYLVANIA, FACTOR Y MUTUAL INSURANCE C OMPANY, ZURICH
AMERICAN INSURANCE C OMPANY ASSOCIATED EL ECTRIC & GAS INSURANCE SERVICES, LIMITED ARCH INSURAN CE COMPANY (EUROPE) LTD., AND CERTAIN UNDERWRI TERS AT LLOYD’S OF LONDON , Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellant Siemens Energy, Inc. f/k/a Siemens Power Generation, Inc.’s motion to dismiss in favor of appellee s National Union Fire Insurance Co mpany of Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, Factory Mutual Insurance Company, Zurich American Insurance Company Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services, Limited Arch Insurance Compan y (Europe) LTD., and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, signed Septembe r 12, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the court ’s order below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant Siemens Energy, Inc. f/k/a Siemens Power Generation, Inc., to pay all co sts incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 11, 2020

NO. 03-19-00144-CV

Maegen Jeanine Fletcher, Appellant

v.

Pingora Loan Servicing, LLC, Its Successors and Assigns, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

DISMISSED ON JOINT MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the county court at law on December 5, 2018.

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the 

Court agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion, vacates 

the Williamson County Court at Law’s judgment, and dismisses the cause without prejudice.

The Court further orders the release of all supersedeas funds, including interest, if any, to 

appellant. Each party shall pay the costs of appeal incurred by that party, both in this Court and

in the court below.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 E0 03 0 . STATE OF GEORGI A v . CHASE MCDERMOTT.

Th e St at e o f G e o r g i a fi l ed t h i s m o ti o n fo r em erg en cy s t ay o f an o rd er i s s u ed

b y t h e Su peri o r Co urt o f Fu l t o n Co u n t y i n STATE OF GEORGI A v

. ONE

THOUSAND ONE H U N D R E D T H IR T Y A N D 00/100 DOLLARS ($ 1,1 3 0 .0 0 ) I N

U NI TED STATES CURRENCY, GLOCK 2 7 .4 0 CAL. (SERI AL# BAEG4 3 6 )

, Cas e No

. 2 0 2 1CV3 5 1 3 6 6

, t o rel eas e s ei zed fu nd s t h at i s s u bject t o a co m p l ai n t i n rem

fo r fo rfei t u re p u rs u an t t o OCGA § § 9 -1 6 -1 2 an d 1 6 -1 3-4 9

.

At t ach m en t s t o t h e m ot i o n s h o w th at th e t ri al co u rt en t ered a fi n al o rd er i n t h e

fo rfei t u re act i o n in fav o r o f th e cl ai m an t o n F eb ru ary 2 4

, 2 0 2 2 (“ it i s h ereb y
ORDERED, ADJ UDGED AND DECREED tha t the $1 ,1 3 0 i n U n i t ed St at es cu rren cy

fo u n d o n M r. M cDerm o t t ’ s p ers o n s h al l b e R ETURNED to M r. M c D e r m o t t

I NSTANTER ”), an d t hat t h e St at e fi l ed a ti m el y n o ti ce o f ap p eal fro m th e ju d g m en t

.

Gi v en t h at t h e St at e’ s ti m el y n ot i ce o f ap p eal fi l ed as pro v i ded i n OCGA § § 5

-
6 -3 7 an d 5 -6 -3 8 serv es as s u p ers ed eas p u rs u an t t o O CGA § 5 -6 -4 6 ( a )

, t h e St at e i s

req u i red t o rel eas e t he co n d em n ed p ro p ert y on l y u p o n d is p o s i t i o n o f t h e ap p eal

. Acco rd in g ly

, t o m ai n t ai n th e s t at u s q u o p en d i n g ap p eal

, t h e St at e’ s m ot io n is h ereb y

GRANTED an d en fo r c e m e n t o f t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s Feb ru ary 2 4

, 2 02 2 o rd er i s s t ay ed

. See al s o OCGA § 9 -1 1 -6 2 (a), (e). February 28, 2022C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.
W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 02/28/2022
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**JEFFREY E. PERELMAN, AND JEP MANAGEMENT, INC., AS EQUITABLE** 

**SUBROGEE OF JEFFREY E.**

**PERELMAN**

**v.**

**RAYMOND G. PERELMAN; DILWORTH PAXSON, LLP: JOSEPH JACOVINI;**  **LAWRENCE MCMICHAEL; MARJORIE OBOD; RONALD PERELMAN; HAINES &**  **ASSOCIATES; CLIFFORD E. HAINES; BUCKLEY, BRION, MCGUIRE, MORRIS**  **& SOMMER LLP; ANDREW C. ECKERT; SIGMUND FLECK; GUNSTER, YOAKLEY**  **& STEWART, P.A.; AND GEORGE S.**

**LEMIEUX**

**PETITION OF: DILWORTH PAXSON LLP, JOSEPH JACOVINI, LAWRENCE** 

**MCMICHAEL AND MARJORIE OBOD :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 65 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 22nd day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal** 

**and Application for Leave to File Reply Brief are** DENIED

**.**

**Justices Donohue and Wecht did not participate in the con sideration or decision** 

**of this matter.**
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: ____2014______-NM-____084______-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
## Petition for **exemption under section 333**

I am writing to petition for exemption of Section 333 regarding Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS). I am the owner of Bongo Ray Productions. I am a n event, concert, sports and wedding photographer and videographer. I would like exemption from Section 333 to use my UAS for commercial use. My intent is to utilize my DJI Phantom 2 UAS for commercial use for videography and photography for, but not limite d to; concerts, events, weddings, commercials, etc. **Proposed Safe Operation** I currently have 1.5 years of safe UAS flight experience with zero incidents . A preflight safety checklist is performed before every take off. I ensure proper compass calibration, GPS signal acquisition and test verification of each flight control before flight. This minimizes risk to persons or property on the ground and ensures the UAS is in condition for safe flight. **UAS Technical Information** DJI Phantom 2 General Features

 Mult ifunctional Quad - rotor System 

###  Precision Flight and Stable Hovering 

###  Auto Return -to - Home & Landing 

###  Self-tightening Propellers 

## Aircraft Technical Specs **Weight (Battery & Propellers Included)** 1000g (2.2 lbs) **Hover Accuracy (Ready To Fly)** Vertical: 2.62 ft Horizontal: 8.2 ft **Max Ascent / Descent Speed** Ascent: 13.4 mph ; Descent: 4.47 mph **Max Flight Speed** 15m/s ( 33 mph ) **Diagonal Length** 13.78 in **Flight Time** 25mins **Tak e** **- Off Weight**  ≤1300g (2.87 lbs) **Operating Temperature** - 10°C ~ 50°C 

## Remote Control Specs **Operating Frequency** 2.4GHz ISM **Communication Distance (Open Area)** 1000m ( 3280 ft) **Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER)** - 97dBm **Work ing Current/Voltage**  120 mA@3.7V **Built -** **In LiPo Battery Work ing Current/Capacity**  3.7V, 2000mAh 

## Go Pro Hero 4 Video Camera **Weight:** 2.93 oz ( **Media Type :**  Flash Card 

## All equipment complies with FCC requirements **Intended UAS use:**

## Petition for **exemption under section 333**

As previously stated the UAS will be utilized to carry a Go Pro Hero 4 camera to capture video and photographs intended for sale by Bongo Ray Productions. The video and photos will be used in wedding, concert and promotional media. This media will be provided to clients for their use. The UAS will **NOT** be flown in the following conditions:  

## Near manned aircraft  

## Flown beyond line of sight of the operator  

## Flown contrary to aeromodeling community
- based safety guidelines  

## Flown within 5 miles of an airport Sincerely, Raymond Jones Owner Bongo Ray Productions
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

JT 1335 1/2                    COPYRIGHT 1930 BY
                             DWIGHT & M. H. JACKSON
                                    CHICAGO
                                 PATENT PENDING

                                    PREFERRED

[NUMBER STAMP]                                                    [SHARES STAMP]

    INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS                   OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                                METALICO, INC.

THIS CERTIFIES THAT_____________________________________________IS THE OWNER OF
_________________________________________________FULL PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE
SHARES OF THE PREFERRED STOCK OF
TRANSFERABLE ONLY ON THE BOOKS OF THE CORPORATION BY THE HOLDER HEREOF IN PERSON
OR BY DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY UPON THE SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERLY
ENDORSED.

      The corporation will furnish without charge to each stockholder who so
requests, the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating,
optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and
the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or
rights.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE SAID CORPORATION HAS CAUSED THIS CERTIFICATE TO BE
SIGNED BY ITS DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS AND TO BE SEALED WITH THE SEAL OF THE
CORPORATION, THIS ________________DAY OF ________________A.D. 19_______________.

     __________________________________         ________________________________
ARNOLD S. GRABER     SECRETARY                  CARLOS E. AGUERO    PRESIDENT

                                     [SEAL]             CORPORATION SUPPLY CO.
        [ILLEGIBLE]                  DIV OF             CHICAGO ILLINOIS 60606
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2539 

To amend the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015, to reauthorize certain projects to increase Colorado 

River System water. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 13, 2018 

Mr. HELLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy and Water Development and Related 

Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015, to reauthorize certain projects to increase Colorado River System water. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF PROJECTS TO IN4 CREASE COLORADO RIVER SYSTEM WATER. 

5 Section 206(c)(2) of the Energy and Water Develop6 ment and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015 (43 

7 U.S.C. 620 note; Public Law 113–235), is amended by 

8 striking ‘‘2018’’ and inserting ‘‘2022’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 73743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20577]



[[Page 73743]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION


Grandfathering Registration Notice

AGENCY: Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists Grandfathering Registration for projects by 
the Susquehanna River Basin Commission during the period set forth in 
DATES.

DATES: August 1-31, 2024.

ADDRESSES: Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 4423 North Front Street, 
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1788.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason E. Oyler, General Counsel and 
Secretary to the Commission, telephone: (717) 238-0423, ext. 1312; fax: 
(717) 238-2436; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#12787d6b7e776052616070713c757d64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c06031500091e2c1f1e0e0f420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>. Regular mail inquiries may be 
sent to the above address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice lists GF Registration for 
projects, described below, pursuant to 18 CFR part 806, subpart E, for 
the time period specified above:
    1. Ahlstrom Filtration LLC, GF Certificate No. GF-202408279, Mount 
Holly Springs Borough, Cumberland County, Pa.; consumptive use; Issue 
Date: August 27, 2024.
    Authority: Public Law 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq., 18 CFR parts 
806 and 808.

    Dated: September 6, 2024.
Jason E. Oyler,
General Counsel and Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-20577 Filed 9-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 31, 2013

NO. 03

- 11

- 00456

- CR

Todd Garrett Wiseman, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no err or in the trial court’s

judgment s : I T IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that the judgment s

of the trial court are in all things affirmed; and it appearing that the appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be c ertified

below for observance.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

2017 WY 37

April Term, A.D. 20 1 7

April 5, 2017

THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE

OF LAW COMMITTEE, WYOMING

STATE BAR,

Petitioner,

v.

RAZOR CITY REALTY, a partnership

of KEVIN L. BECK, Responsible

B roker, Wyoming License No. 1065, and

RICHARD K. KISTLER, Associate

Broker, Wyoming License No. 5006,

Respondents. D

- 17

- 0001



### O RDER 

### A PPROVING 

### C ONSENT 

### A GREEMENT

[¶1] This matter came before the Court upon a “Report and Recommendation for

Approval of Cons ent Agreement ,” filed herein March 2 , 20 1 7 , by the Unauthorized

Practice of Law Committee o f the Wyoming State Bar (the Committee) . A fter a careful

review of the Committee ’s Report and Recommendation , the attached “Consent

Agreement,” the materials attach ed thereto, and the file, this Court finds that the Report

and Recommendation should be approved, confirmed

, and adopted by the Court, and that

the parties’ C onsent A greement should be approved , pursuant to Rule 7(e) of the Rules of

Procedure Governing Una uthorized Practice of Law. It is, therefore,

[¶2] ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that the Unauthorized Practice of Law

Committee’s “Report and Recommendation for Approval of Consent Agreement ,” which

is attached hereto and incorporated herein, shall be, and the sa me hereby is, approved,

confirmed, and adopted by this Court; and it is further[¶3] ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that the parties’ “Consent Agreement” be, and

hereby is, accepted by this Court and the terms of the Consent Agreement are hereby

adopted.

[¶4] DA TED this 4 th day of A pril , 201 7

.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

E. JAMES BU R KE

Chief Justice
**EXHIBIT 21.01**
**GENELABS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**
**LIST OF REGISTRANT’S SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES**           **Percent Owned**  **State or** **by Genelabs**  **Country of** **Technologies,****Name** **Organization** **Inc.**Accelerated Clinical Research Organization, Inc. Delaware  100%Genelabs Asia Pte. Ltd. Singapore  100%*Genelabs Diagnostic, Inc. Delaware  100%Genelabs Diagnostics Pte. Ltd. Singapore  100%**Genelabs Europe B.V. Netherlands  100%
* Wholly-owned by Genelabs Diagnostic, Inc. ** Wholly-owned by Genelabs Asia Pte. Ltd.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Sunrise Energy Resources, Inc. a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), Roman Livson, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Sunrise Energy Resources, Inc., and will be retained by Sunrise Energy
Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.




Date:
      March 26, 2010By:
              /s/ Roman LivsonRoman
      LivsonChief
      Financial Officer
ROBERT BRZOZOWSKI,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2941

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 17, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

William F. Stone, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Barbara J. Busharis, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charles R. Mccoy, Senior Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See White v. Florida Dept. of Children & Families, 981 So. 2d 

1233, 1235 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Jackson v. State, 802 So. 2d 1213, 1216 (Fla. 2d 

DCA 2002) (recognizing that immediate release is not the proper remedy for 

violations of the post-commitment procedures in section 394.918, Florida Statutes).
2

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Sunrise Energy Resources, Inc. a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), Konstantin Tsiryulnikov, Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the
  Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Sunrise Energy Resources, Inc., and will be retained by Sunrise Energy
Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.




Date:
      March 30, 2009By:
              /s/ Konstantin
      TsiryulnikovKonstantin
      TsiryulnikovChief
      Executive Officer
#### MITCHELL v. STATE.

No. 16549.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 10, 1934.

R. E. Eubank, of Paris, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year and six months.

The proceedings appear regular, including the indictment, the charge of the court, and the verdict of the jury. The facts heard upon the trial are not brought up for review.

There is some complaint of giving to the jury alternate forms upon which they might write the verdict. The practice has in some instances been regarded as not advisable, but in the absence of injury has never been held reversible error.

Perceiving no error justifying a reversal, the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kelcy L. Warren, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 12, 2008



/s/ Kelcy L. WarrenKelcy L. Warren Chief Executive
Officer


*A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to
and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.