45288 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 147 / Tuesday, July 31, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1786(t). 

8. Amend § 750.1 by revising 

paragraph (e)(1)(ii) to read as follows: 

§ 750.1 Definitions. 

* * * * * 

(ii) * * * 

(C) The federally insured credit union 

is in troubled condition as defined in 

§ 700.2(j) of this chapter; or 

(D) In the case of a corporate credit 

union, the federally insured credit 

union is undercapitalized as defined in 

§ 704.4 of this chapter; or 

(E) The federally insured credit union 

is subject to a proceeding to terminate 

or suspend its share insurance; and 

* * * * * 

9. Remove paragraph (l) of § 750.1. 

[FR Doc. 2012–18560 Filed 7–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7535–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2012–0725; Directorate 

Identifier 2011–NM–207–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, 

Inc. 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–1A11 

(CL–600), CL–600–2A12 (CL–601), CL– 

600–2B16 (CL–601–3A, CL–601–3R, & 

CL–604 Variants) airplanes. This 

proposed AD was prompted by reports 

of cracking found on the upper and 

lower web of the engine support beam. 

This proposed AD would require 

revising the maintenance program. We 

are proposing this AD to detect and 

correct fatigue cracking of the engine 

support beam, which could result in 

failure of the engine support beam and 

affect the structural integrity of the 

airplane. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by September 14, 

2012. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Bombardier, 

Inc., 400 Coˆte-Vertu Road West, Dorval, 

Que ́bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 

514–855–5000; fax 514–855–7401; email 

thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet 

http://www.bombardier.com. You may 

review copies of the referenced service 

information at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, Washington. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Operations 

office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in 

the ADDRESSES section. Comments will 

be available in the AD docket shortly 

after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen Kowalski, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe and Mechanical Systems 

Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York 

Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 

Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, 

New York 11590; telephone (516) 228– 

7327; fax (516) 794–5531. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2012–0725; Directorate Identifier 

2011–NM–207–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD based on those comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

Transport Canada Civil Aviation 

(TCCA), which is the aviation authority 

for Canada, has issued Canadian 

Airworthiness Directive CF–2011–33, 

dated August 16, 2011 (referred to after 

this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe 

condition for the specified products. 

The MCAI states: 

Cracks on the upper and lower web of the 

Engine Support Beam (ESB) have been 

discovered on two (2) Challenger aeroplanes 

in service. Failure of the ESB could adversely 

affect the structural integrity of the 

aeroplane. 

A Temporary Revision (TR) has been made 

to the Time Limits/Maintenance Checks 

(TLMC) manual to introduce a new 

Airworthiness Limitations (AWL) task to 

ensure that fatigue cracking of the ESB is 

detected and corrected. 

This [TCCA] directive mandates the 

incorporation of the new AWL task. 

You may obtain further information by 

examining the MCAI in the AD docket. 

Relevant Service Information 

Bombardier, Inc. has issued the 

following temporary revisions. The 

actions described in this service 

information are intended to correct the 

unsafe condition identified in the 

MCAI. 

• Task 53–10–00–198, Torque Box 

specified in Canadair Challenger 

Temporary Revision (TR) 5–151, dated 

May 31, 2011, to the Canadair 

Challenger Time Limits/Maintenance 

Checks Manual, PSP 605 (for Model CL– 

600–1A11 (CL–600) airplanes). 

• Task 53–10–00–198, Engine 

Support Beam specified in Canadair 

Challenger TR 5–250, dated May 31, 

2011, to the Canadair Challenger Time 

Limits/Maintenance Checks Manual, 

PSP 601–5 (for Model CL–600–2A12 

(CL–601) airplanes). 

• Task 53–10–00–198, Engine 

Support Beam specified in Canadair 

Challenger TR 5–261, dated May 31, 

2011, to the Canadair Challenger Time 

Limits/Maintenance Checks Manual, 

PSP 601A–5 (for Model CL–600–2B16 

(CL–601–3A and CL–601–3R Variants) 

airplanes). 

• Task 53–30–00–155, Detailed 

Inspection of the Engine Support Beam 

specified in Bombardier Challenger 604 

TR 5–2–47, dated May 31, 2011, to the 

Bombardier Challenger 604 Time 

Limits/Maintenance Checks Manual (for 

Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–604 Variants) 

airplanes). 

• Task 53–30–00–155, Detailed 

Inspection of the Engine Support Beam 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 147 / Tuesday, July 31, 2012 / Proposed Rules 45289 

specified in Bombardier Challenger 605 

TR 5–2–9, dated May 31, 2011, to the 

Bombardier Challenger 605 Time 

Limits/Maintenance Checks Manual (for 

Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–604 Variants) 

airplanes). 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This Proposed AD 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country, and is approved for operation 

in the United States. Pursuant to our 

bilateral agreement with the State of 

Design Authority, we have been notified 

of the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are proposing this 

AD because we evaluated all pertinent 

information and determined an unsafe 

condition exists and is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of the same 

type design. 

Costs of Compliance 

Based on the service information, we 

estimate that this proposed AD would 

affect about 111 products of U.S. 

registry. We also estimate that it would 

take about 1 work-hour per product to 

comply with the basic requirements of 

this proposed AD. The average labor 

rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on 

these figures, we estimate the cost of the 

proposed AD on U.S. operators to be 

$9,435, or $85 per product. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 

3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in 

Alaska; and 

4. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this proposed AD and placed it in the 

AD docket. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2012– 

0725; Directorate Identifier 2011–NM– 

207–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by September 

14, 2012. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

(1) This AD applies to the airplane models 

specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), 

(c)(1)(iii), and (c)(1)(iv) of this AD, 

certificated in any category. 

(i) Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–1A11 

(CL–600), serial numbers 1004 through 1085 

inclusive. 

(ii) Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2A12 

(CL–601), serial numbers 3001 through 3066 

inclusive. 

(iii) Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2B16 

(CL–601–3A and CL–601–3R Variants), serial 

numbers 5001 through 5194 inclusive. 

(iv) Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2B16 

(CL–604 Variants), serial numbers 5301 

through 5665 inclusive, and 5701 and 

subsequent. 

(2) This AD requires revisions to certain 

operator maintenance documents to include 

new inspections. Compliance with these 

inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). 

For airplanes that have been previously 

modified, altered, or repaired in the areas 

addressed by these inspections, the operator 

may not be able to accomplish the 

inspections described in the revisions. In this 

situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), 

the operator must request approval for an 

alternative method of compliance according 

to paragraph (j) of this AD. The request 

should include a description of changes to 

the required inspections that will ensure the 

continued damage tolerance of the affected 

structure. The FAA has provided guidance 

for this determination in FAA Advisory 

Circular (AC) 25.1529–1A, dated November 

20, 2007 (http://rgl/Regulatory_and_

Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/

E4111B5537E0B345862573B0006FA23B?

OpenDocument). 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 05, Periodic Inspections. 

(e) Reason 

This AD was prompted by reports of 

cracking found on the upper and lower web 

of the engine support beam. We are issuing 

this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking 

of the engine support beam, which could 

result in failure of the engine support beam 

and affect the structural integrity of the 

airplane. 

(f) Compliance 

You are responsible for having the actions 

required by this AD performed within the 

compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

(g) Time Limits/Maintenance Checks (TLMC) 

Manual Revision 

Within 60 days after the effective date of 

this AD, revise the maintenance program to 

incorporate the applicable information 

specified in paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(4) 

of this AD. 

(1) For Model CL–600–1A11 (CL–600) 

airplanes: Task 53–10–00–198, Torque Box, 

specified in Canadair Challenger TR 5–151, 

dated May 31, 2011, to the TLMC Manual, 

PSP 605. 

(2) For Model CL–600–2A12 (CL–601 

Variant) airplanes: Task 53–10–00–198, 

Engine Support Beam, specified in Canadair 

Challenger TR 5–250, dated May 31, 2011, to 

the TLMC Manual, PSP 601–5. 

(3) For Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–601–3A 

and CL–601–3B Variant) airplanes: Task 53– 

10–00–198, Engine Support Beam, specified 

in Canadair Challenger TR 5–261, dated May 

31, 2011, to the TLMC Manual, PSP 601A– 

5. 

(4) For Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–604 

Variant) airplanes: Task 53–30–00–155, 

Detailed Inspection of the Engine Support 

Beam, specified in Bombardier Challenger 

604 TR 5–2–47, dated May 31, 2011, to the 

Bombardier Challenger 604 TLMC Manual; or 

Task 53–30–00–155, Detailed Inspection of 

the Engine Support Beam, specified in 

Bombardier Challenger 605 TR 5–2–9, dated 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
45290 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 147 / Tuesday, July 31, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

May 31, 2011, to the Bombardier Challenger 

605 TLMC Manual. 

Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: The 

maintenance program revision required by 

paragraph (g) of this AD may be done by 

inserting a copy of Bombardier Temporary 

Revision (TR) 5–151, TR 5–250, TR 5–261, 

and TR 5–2–47 or TR 5–2–9, all dated May 

31, 2011, into the applicable TLMC manual. 

When the TR has been included in general 

revisions of the TLMC manual, the general 

revisions may be inserted in the TLMC 

manual, provided the relevant information in 

the general revision is identical to that in the 

applicable TR specified in paragraphs (g)(1) 

through (g)(4) of this AD. 

(h) Initial Compliance Times for Inspections 

The initial compliance time for the 

inspections specified in the temporary 

revisions specified in paragraphs (g)(1) 

through (g)(4) of this AD, is before the 

accumulation of 7,800 total flight cycles, or 

within 12 months after the effective date of 

this AD, whichever occurs later. 

(i) No Alternative Actions or Intervals 

After accomplishing the revision required 

by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative 

actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be 

used unless the actions or intervals are 

approved as an alternative method of 

compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the 

procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this 

AD. 

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office, ANE–170, FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program 

Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, 

FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, 

Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; 

telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531. 

Before using any approved AMOC, notify 

your appropriate principal inspector, or 

lacking a principal inspector, the manager of 

the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. The AMOC 

approval letter must specifically reference 

this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(k) Related Information 

(1) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness 

Directive CF–2011–33, dated August 16, 

2011, and the temporary revisions specified 

in paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(4) of this AD, 

for related information. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 CoˆteVertu Road West, Dorval, Que ́bec H4S 1Y9, 

Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514– 

855–7401; email 

thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet http:// 

www.bombardier.com. You may review 

copies of the referenced service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 20, 

2012. 

Kalene C. Yanamura, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2012–18585 Filed 7–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2012–0662; Airspace 

Docket No. 08–AWA–2] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Proposed Modification of Class B 

Airspace Area; Philadelphia, PA 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

modify the Philadelphia, PA, Class B 

airspace area to ensure the containment 

of large turbine-powered aircraft within 

Class B airspace, reduce controller 

workload, and reduce the potential for 

midair collision in the Philadelphia 

terminal area. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before October 1, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC 20590–0001; telephone: 

(202) 366–9826. You must identify FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2012–0662 and 

Airspace Docket No. 08–AWA–2, at the 

beginning of your comments. You may 

also submit comments through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Gallant, Airspace, Regulations and ATC 

Procedures Group, Office of Airspace 

Services, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA– 

2012–0662 and Airspace Docket No. 08– 

AWA–2) and be submitted in triplicate 

to the Docket Management Facility (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number). You may also submit 

comments through the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this action must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to 

Docket Nos. FAA–2012–0662 and 

Airspace Docket No. 08–AWA–2.’’ The 

postcard will be date/time stamped and 

returned to the commenter. 

All communications received on or 

before the specified closing date for 

comments will be considered before 

taking action on the proposed rule. The 

proposal contained in this action may 

be changed in light of comments 

received. All comments submitted will 

be available for examination in the 

public docket both before and after the 

closing date for comments. A report 

summarizing each substantive public 

contact with FAA personnel concerned 

with this rulemaking will be filed in the 

docket. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and 

5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. An informal 

docket may also be examined during 

normal business hours at the office of 

the Eastern Service Center, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Room 210, 

1701 Columbia Ave., College Park, GA 

30337. 

Persons interested in being placed on 

a mailing list for future NPRMs should 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS