alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and statement of operations and is qualified in its entirety to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          11,367
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     13,019<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,279
<PP&E>                                          94,705
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,184
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,042
<BONDS>                                         74,925<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,137<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,184
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,706
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               111,898
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   327<F4>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,288
<INCOME-TAX>                                       502
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,786
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,318)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       468
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
<FN>
<F1>Includes the following assets:  prepaid expenses and other of $3,635, demand
note of $1,341, deferred income taxes--current of $843, deferred income
taxes--long-term of $400, restricted cash of $3,442, investment in limited
partnership of $192, and intangible assets, net of $3,166.
<F2>Includes the following long-term liabilities:  deferred income of $3,054,
capital lease obligation of $53,789, and long-term debt of $18,082.
<F3>Includes the following equity accounts:  additional paid-in capital of
$48,911
and accumulated deficit of $(5,774).
<F4>Includes loss on investment in limited partnership of $327.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2014-0252 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-NM-213-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 12-AD-40

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 65 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 65

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Election Commission with 
     respect to travel on private aircraft for Federal candidates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2009

  Mrs. Halvorson introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Election Commission with 
     respect to travel on private aircraft for Federal candidates.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Federal Election Commission relating to campaign 
travel (published at 74 Federal Register 63951 (December 7, 2009)), and 
such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-619-001]

Take notice that on November 21, 2000, High Island Offshore System, L.L.C. (HIOS), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, with an effective date of November 1, 2000: 

Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 105

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 106 

HIOS states that the tendered sheets are filed in compliance with the Commission's October 27, 2000 Order in the referenced dockets, regarding the netting and trading of imbalances on HIOS' system.

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                    (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30742 Filed12-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 23.2



|     |                         |                          |                            |                                  
|---- | ----------------------- | ------------------------ | -------------------------- | ---------------------------------
|LOGO |                         | Tel.: +52 (55) 8503 4200 |                            | Castillo Miranda y Compañia, S.C.
|     | Fax: +52 (55) 8503 4299 |                          | Paseo de la Reforma 505-31
|     | www.bdomexico.com       |                          | Colonia Cuauhtémoc        
|     |                         |                          | Mexico, D.F.              
|     |                         |                          | CP 06500                  

Lifetime Brands, Inc.

We hereby consent to incorporate in the 2011 Form 10-K of Lifetime Brands, our report double dated February 29 and April 23, 2012, related to the audit we performed on the consolidated financial
statements of Grupo Vasconia, S.A.B. and subsidiaries for the year ended as of December 31, 2011.



CASTILLO MIRANDA Y COMPAÑIA, S.C Member of BDO Internacional/s/ Bernardo Soto PeñafielBernardo Soto Peñafiel, CPA


Mexico City

April 26, 2012

Castillo Miranda y Compañia, S. C. (BDO Castillo Miranda) es una
sociedad civil mexicana de contadores publicos y consultores de empresas, miembro de BDO International Limited, una compañia del Reino Unido limitada por garantía, y forma parte de la red internacional de firmas independientes de BDO.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23




                       Consent of Independent Auditors



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
International Lottery, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-08999 on Form S-3 of International Lottery, Inc. of our report dated
February 21, 1997, relating to the balance sheets of International Lottery,
Inc. as of December 31, 1995 and 1996, and the related statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, and the related
schedule, which report appears in the 1996 annual report to shareholders, which
is incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1996 Form 10-K of
International Lottery, Inc.

                                        /s/
                                        ---------------------
                                        KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Louisville, Kentucky
March 27, 1997
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EP MedSystems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  |                                                      
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Matthew C. Hill                                  
|                        |  |  |  | Matthew C. Hill                                      
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
#### Willie MIHOVIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 10645.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Galveston.

June 23, 1938.

GRAVES, Justice.

This cause being a companion one to No. 10626, Willie Mihovil v. Norfleet Hill, Sheriff of Harris County, Tex.Civ.App., 118 S.W.2d 615, comes here on the same state of facts; the only difference being that in this cause the same appellant was refused a temporary injunction by the 61st District Court as against the State of Texas on identical facts, whereas in the other one he was refused a mandatory writ of injunction against the Sheriff of Harris County.

The cause now at bar has, as stated, been brought here upon the same state of facts as was No. 10626, but without briefs or arguments from either side; no reason having been presented for a different decision in this instance than was made on the other one by the judgment of affirmance, this day. entered therein, a like order will now be entered upon this appeal, the opinion filed upon the other record serving the same office upon this one. Judgment affirmed.

Affirmed.

PLEASANTS, C. J., absent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,370                   3,498
<SECURITIES>                                     3,184                   6,297
<RECEIVABLES>                                       98                      55
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,030                  10,041
<PP&E>                                           2,345                   1,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,027                     836
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,394                  11,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,234                   1,470
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           105                     105
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,920                  10,041
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,394                  11,768
<SALES>                                              0                       7
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   205                     483
<CGS>                                                0                     579
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      294                     930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,889                   9,352
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,853)                (10,140)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,853)                (10,140)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.47)                  (1.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2425 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2425

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the Internal 
           Revenue Service's private debt collection program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2018

  Mr. Cardin (for himself, Mr. Brown, and Ms. Warren) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the Internal 
           Revenue Service's private debt collection program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF RULES RELATING TO TAX COLLECTION CONTRACTS.

    (a) In General.--Sections 6306 and 6307 of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 are hereby repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 6103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
        amended by striking paragraph (12).
            (2) Section 7433A(a) of such Code is amended by inserting 
        ``, as in effect on December 31, 2017'' after ``as defined in 
        section 6306(b)''.
            (3) Section 7809(a) of such Code is amended by striking 
        ``6306,''.
            (4) Section 7811 of such Code is amended by striking 
        subsection (g).
            (5) The table of sections for subchapter A of chapter 64 of 
        such Code is amended by striking the items relating to sections 
        6306 and 6307.
                                 <all>
```
"richardastrust.com" 

<richard@astrust.com>

07/04/2007 10:13 PM

To Margaret Sheppard/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

bcc

Subject white goods

History:

This message has been replied to and forwarded.

Dear Margaret:

My intention for HCR188C is to be used in new refrigerators and new home air conditioners 

units.To retrofit a refrigerator or AC home unit is not feasible because of cost.

The normal home window unit 12000 BTU is around $200.00 and the normal-sized refrigerator 

is approx $500.00. Whenever one fails, it is cheaper to buy a new one and not fix it. 

I guess I did not clarify this. 

Most of the exposure of HCR188c would be at a factory when they charge the new system. 

If there is a failure or warranty, they would just discard it and the store would replace it with a 

new one. The old one is scrapped. Scrap yards just recycle the unit by removing the refrigerant 

and sell it as propane for the barbecue grill. It would be easier to blend the refrigerant from new 

hydrocarbons. 

I have used a Robin air EPA-approved reclaimer for HCR188c which has an oil-separator

which separates the compressor oil from HCR188C and recycles HCR188C back into a canister. 

I found it much more effective using the recycled refrigerant in a BBQ charcoal burner. It can be 

reused as a refrigerant but my own personal feeling is that it is such a small amount and that part 

of the blend might get lost in the process so I would rather have a brand new blend in an air 

conditioner. Although I've used it over and over many times, the barbecue grill was the best.

At Cortland, New York while testing my refrigerant at Intertek in February of this year, I did ask 

Rob Hill about a reclaimer for Hydrocarbon Refrigerant, All he told me was that there was no 

company that he knows is doing it since the EPA has not approved it as an Alternative 

Refrigerant.
I will ask him again in writing and get his response.

If this is part of a satisfactory explanation then I will get the rest of the clarification to you

in a formal letter.

Thank you 

Richard
1 | Building Technologies Office eere.energy.gov 

# Impact of Standards on Low Income Tenants

• Currently DOE treats low

- income consumers like everyone else

• In the LCC all households pay the full cost of more efficient furnaces and gain the full benefit of lower energy bills



## • M ost low income households are tenants:

• Tenants usually pay energy bills but don’t choose equipment.



## • What is the impact of efficiency standards relative to NOPR LCC results?

• Assumptions:

• Renters unaware of energy savings*

• Energy savings won’t raise rents



### • Landlords aware of higher energy costs*

• They pay higher cost of efficient equipment

• They attempt to raise rents, but may not cover equipment costs



## • Implications

• Tenants benefit from lower energy bills.

• Rent increases may not cover higher equipment cost

• Overall, tenants probably better off than suggested by LCC results

*SOURCE : Erica Myers, “Asymmetric Information in residential Rental Markets: Implications for the energy efficiency gap." Energy Institute Haas School of Business, University of California, Working Paper WP 246, February 20152 | Building Technologies Office eere.energy.gov 

# Impact of Efficiency Standards on Rent

Rent pass through 50% of cost, assuming typical demand and supply elasticity (E s =. 5, E d =.5) Rent pass through 0% of first cost, assuming totally inelastic supply (E s = 0)



## Rent pass through formula =

- E s 

## /( E s 

## – E d 

## ) Equipment Cost

Equipment Cost3 | Building Technologies Office eere.energy.gov 

## Probable Impact of Standards on Low Income Households

– Summary Table

Housing Ownership Average

Annual Income (2009$) Impact Efficiency Standards on tenants

Impact on Energy Bill Impact of first

Cost on Rent Net Benefits

Compared to LCC Public Housing $7,385 Full savings Partial increase Underestimated
Renters $9,340 Full savings Partial increase Underestimated
Owners $10,327 Full savings Full Same