74882 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 178 / Friday, September 13, 2024 / Notices 

14See Order, 85 FR at 52547. 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

71829 (October 17, 2023). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated April 8, 2024. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. 

4See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain 

Steel Nails from the People’s Republic of China, 73 

FR 44961 (August 1, 2008) (Order). 

5For a complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum 

for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Certain Steel Nails from the 

People’s Republic of China; 2022–2023,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

6See, e.g., Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to 

Length Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany: 

Recission of Antidumping Administrative Review; 

2020–2021, 88 FR 4157 (January 24, 2023). 

7See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

8See, e.g., Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co. v. 

United States, 380 F. Supp. 3d 1328, 1335–36 (CIT 

2019) (referencing section 751(a) of the Act, the U.S. 

Court of International Trade held that: ‘‘While the 

statute does not explicitly require that an entry be 

suspended as a prerequisite for establishing 

entitlement to a review, it does explicitly state the 

determined rate will be used as the liquidation rate 

for the reviewed entries. This result can only obtain 

if the liquidation of entries has been suspended 

. . .);’’ see also Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018–2019, 

86 FR 36102, and accompanying Issues and 

Decision Memorandum at Comment 4; and Solid 

Fertilizer Grade Ammonium Nitrate from the 

Russian Federation: Notice of Rescission of 

final results of this review, except if the 

rate is less than 0.50 percent and, 

therefore, de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rate will be 

zero; (2) for previously investigated or 

reviewed companies not covered in this 

review, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific 

cash deposit rate published for the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the company 

participated; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, or the lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but 

the manufacturer is, then the cash 

deposit rate will be the rate established 

for the most recent segment for the 

manufacturer of the merchandise; and 

(4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

manufacturers or exporters will 

continue to be 5.41 percent, the allothers rate established in the LTFV 

investigation.14 These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: September 6, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

V. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Companies for Which Commerce Is 

Rescinding the Review 

1. CS Wind China Co., Ltd. 

2. CS Wind Corporation. 

3. CS Wind Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 

4. CS Wind Taiwan Ltd. 

5. CS Wind Turkey Kule Imalati A.S. 

6. CS Wind UK Limited. 

7. CS Wind Vietnam Co., Ltd. 

8. CS Wind Portugal, S. A. 

9. Enercon Korea Inc. 

10. GE Renewable Energy 

11. Hyosung Heavy Industries 

12. Nordex SE 

13. Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy 

Limited 

14. Vestas Korea 

15. Vestas Korea Wind Technology Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2024–20778 Filed 9–12–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–909] 

Certain Steel Nails From the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Intent To Rescind, in Part; 

2022–2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

determines that Shanghai Yueda Nails 

Co., Ltd., a.k.a. Shanghai Yueda Nails 

Industry Co., Ltd. (Shanghai Yueda), an 

exporter of certain steel nails from the 

People’s Republic of China (China), sold 

subject merchandise in the United 

States at prices below normal value 

(NV) during the period of review (POR) 

August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable September 13, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob 

Palmer or Hannah Lee, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–9068 or (202) 482–1216, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

This administrative review is being 

conducted in accordance with section 

751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). Commerce 

published the notice of initiation of this 

administrative review on October 17, 

2023.1 In addition to the mandatory 

respondent, Shanghai Yueda, this 

review also covers nine other 

companies. On April 8, 2024, Commerce 

extended the preliminary results 

deadline until August 30, 2024.2 On 

July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain 

deadlines in this administrative 

proceeding by seven days.3 The 

deadline for the preliminary results is 

now September 6, 2024. 

Scope of the Order 4

The products covered by the Order 

are nails from China. A full description 

of the scope of the Order is contained 

in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.5

Intent To Rescind Administrative 

Review, in Part 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is 

Commerce’s practice to rescind an 

administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order where it 

determines that there were no 

suspended entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR.6

Normally, upon completion of an 

administrative review, the suspended 

entries are liquidated at the 

antidumping duty assessment rate for 

the review period.7 Therefore, for an 

administrative review to be conducted, 

there must be a reviewable, suspended 

entry that Commerce can instruct 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

liquidate at the calculated antidumping 

duty assessment rate for the review 

period.8


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 178 / Friday, September 13, 2024 / Notices 74883 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 

65532 (October 29, 2012) (noting that ‘‘for an 

administrative review to be conducted, there must 

be a reviewable, suspended entry to be liquidated 

at the newly calculated assessment rate’’). 

9See Memorandum, ‘‘Release of Customs Entry 

Data for Respondent Selection,’’ dated November 8, 

2023. 

10See Appendix II for a list of these companies. 

11Because no interested party requested a review 

of the China-wide entity and Commerce no longer 

considers the China-wide entity as an exporter 

conditionally subject to administrative reviews, we 

did not conduct a review of the China-wide entity. 

Thus, the rate (i.e., 118.04 percent) for the Chinawide entity is not subject to change as a result of 

this review. See Antidumping Proceedings: 

Announcement of Change in Department Practice 

for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings and Conditional Review of the 

Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping 

Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65969–70 

(November 4, 2013). 

12See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative 

Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 

88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (APO and 

Final Service Rule). 

13See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

14We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an 

argument that Commerce would normally address 

in a comment of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

15See APO and Final Service Rule. 

16See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; see also 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(1). 

On November 8, 2023, Commerce 

placed CBP entry data on the record for 

U.S. imports of the subject merchandise 

during the POR for respondent selection 

purposes.9 Eight companies under 

review have existing separate rates but 

no suspended entries during the POR.10

In the absence of any reviewable, 

suspended entries of subject 

merchandise from these companies 

during the POR, Commerce hereby 

notifies all interested parties of its intent 

to rescind this administrative review 

with respect to these companies. 

Commerce is providing interested 

parties with an opportunity to submit 

comments on this preliminary decision, 

including factual information. 

Comments, including factual 

information, from interested parties are 

due to Commerce no later than seven 

days after the publication of these 

preliminary results. Rebuttal comments, 

including rebuttal factual information, 

are due seven days thereafter. All 

submissions must be filed electronically 

at http://access.trade.gov in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.303. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Act. We calculated export prices 

in accordance with section 772 of the 

Act. Because China is an NME country 

within the meaning of section 771(18) of 

the Act, NV has been calculated in 

accordance with section 773(c) of the 

Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

topics discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is included as 

an Appendix to this notice. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is made available 

to the public via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is available at 

https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Separate Rates 

We preliminarily determine that 

Shanghai Yueda is eligible for a separate 

rate in this administrative review. 

Because S-Mart (Tianjin) Technology 

Development Co., Ltd. (S-Mart) did not 

submit either a separate rate application 

or a separate rate certification, it is not 

eligible for a separate rate. 

Preliminary Results of the Review 

As a result of our analysis of the 

information on the record, Commerce 

preliminarily determines the following 

estimated weighted-average dumping 

margin exists for the POR: 11

Exporter 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent ad valorem) 

Shanghai Yueda Nails Co., Ltd., a.k.a. Shanghai Yueda Nails Industry Co., Ltd .............................................................. 7.14 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed for these 

preliminary results to the parties no 

later than five days after the date of 

publication of this notice in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii), 

interested parties may submit a case 

brief no later than 30 days after the date 

of publication of this notice. Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, may be filed not later than 

five days after the date for filing case 

briefs.12 Interested parties who submit 

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding must submit: (1) a table of 

contents listing each issue; and (2) a 

table of authorities.13

As provided under 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 

proceedings we have encouraged 

interested parties to provide an 

executive summary of their brief that 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes. In this review, we 

instead request that interested parties 

provide at the beginning of their briefs 

a public, executive summary for each 

issue raised in their briefs.14 Further, we 

request that interested parties limit their 

executive summary of each issue to no 

more than 450 words, not including 

citations. We intend to use the executive 

summaries as the basis of the comment 

summaries included in the issues and 

decision memorandum that will 

accompany the final results in this 

administrative review. We request that 

interested parties include footnotes for 

relevant citations in the executive 

summary of each issue. Note that 

Commerce has amended certain of its 

requirements pertaining to the service of 

documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).15

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) 

the party’s name, address, and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of issues to be 

discussed. Issues raised in the hearing 

will be limited to those raised in the 

respective case briefs. An electronically 

filed hearing request must be received 

successfully in its entirety by 

Commerce’s electronic records system, 

ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within 

30 days after the date of publication of 

this notice. 

Final Results of Review 

Unless extended, we intend to issue 

the final results of this administrative 

review, which will include the results of 

our analysis of issues raised in the case 

and rebuttal briefs, within 120 days of 

the date of publication of this notice in 

the Federal Register.16


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
74884 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 178 / Friday, September 13, 2024 / Notices 

17See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

18 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied 

the assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

19For calculated (estimated) ad valorem 

importer-specific assessment rates used in 

determining whether the per-unit assessment rate is 

de minimis, see Memorandum, ‘‘Preliminary 

Results Margin Calculation for Shanghai Yueda 

Nails Co., Ltd.,’’ dated concurrently with this 

notice, and accompanying Margin Calculation 

Program Logs and Outputs. 

20See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

21See NME Practice for a full discussion. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, 

Commerce will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review.17 Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 35 days 

after the publication date of the final 

results of this review in the Federal 

Register. If a timely summons is filed at 

the U.S. Court of International Trade, 

the assessment instructions will direct 

CBP not to liquidate relevant entries 

until the time for parties to file a request 

for a statutory injunction has expired 

(i.e., within 90 days of publication). 

If Shanghai Yueda’s ad valorem 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 

0.50 percent) in the final results of this 

review, Commerce will calculate 

importer-specific assessment rates on 

the basis of the ratio of the total amount 

of dumping calculated for the importer’s 

examined sales and the total quantity of 

those sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).18 Commerce will also 

calculate estimated ad valorem 

importer-specific assessment rates with 

which to assess whether the per-unit 

assessment rate is de minimis.19 We will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review when the importerspecific ad valorem assessment rate 

calculated in the final results of this 

review is not zero or de minimis. Where 

Shanghai Yueda’s ad valorem weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis, or an importer-specific ad 

valorem assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis,20 we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For entries that were not reported in the 

U.S. sales data submitted by Shanghai 

Yueda, Commerce will instruct CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the rate for the 

China-wide entity.21

For the final results, if we continue to 

treat S-Mart as part of the China-wide 

entity, we will instruct CBP to apply an 

ad valorem assessment rate of 118.04 

percent to all entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR which was 

exported by that company. 

For the companies for which we 

intend to rescind the review in the final 

results based on no reviewable entries, 

provided we receive no contrary 

information, we intend to instruct CBP 

to assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries at a rate equal to the 

cash deposit rate of estimated 

antidumping duties required at the time 

of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, 

for consumption in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends 

to issue assessment instructions to CBP 

for these companies no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results in the Federal Register. 

In accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final results 

of this review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of this review and for future 

deposits of estimated antidumping 

duties, as applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for Shanghai 

Yueda, the cash deposit rate will be 

equal to the weighted-average dumping 

margin established in the final results of 

this review (except that if the ad 

valorem rate is de minimis, then the 

cash deposit rate will be zero); (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not 

listed above that have separate rates, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing exporter-specific cash deposit 

rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of 

subject merchandise that have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate for 

the China-wide entity; and (4) for all 

non-Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own separate rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

Chinese exporter that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This administrative review and notice 

are issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act, 19 CFR 351.213, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: September 6, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Intent to Rescind Review, In Part 

V. Discussion of the Methodology 

VI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Non-Selected Companies Under Review 

1. Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd. 

2. Nanjing Caiqing Hardware Co., Ltd. 

3. Nanjing Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd. 

4. Shandong Qingyun Hongyi Hardware 

Products Co., Ltd. 

5. Shanxi Hairui Trade Co., Ltd. 

6. Suntec Industries Co., Ltd. 

7. Tianjin Jinchi Metal Products Co., Ltd. 

8. Xi’an Metals & Minerals Import & Export 

Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2024–20760 Filed 9–12–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–871] 

Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From 

India: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, and Rescission, in Part; 2022– 

2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

finds that producers and/or exporters 

subject to this administrative review 

made sales of subject merchandise at 

less than normal value (NV) during the 

period of review (POR) August 1, 2022, 

through July 31, 2023. We are also 

rescinding the review with respect to 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES