alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PACIFIC
SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.'S FORM 10-K FOR THE ANNUAL PERIOD ENDING JANUARY 31,
1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                      19,031,738
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  899,179
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 42,469,829
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            70,103,364
<PP&E>                                      93,696,916
<DEPRECIATION>                            (20,773,496)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             147,774,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,558,689
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       204,339
<OTHER-SE>                                 116,492,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               147,774,851
<SALES>                                    321,125,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           321,125,009
<CGS>                                      212,859,474
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               70,369,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (977,398)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             38,873,509
<INCOME-TAX>                                15,369,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         23,504,509
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                23,504,509
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.13<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.09
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes of This Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 6, 

2012

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00732-CV

AGILE SEISMIC, L.L.C., Appellant

V.

DYNAMIC GLOBAL ADVISORS COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 125th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-27739

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 17, 2012. On August 22, 2012, 

appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because it has been rendered moot. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         1
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,188,159
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,009,064
<PP&E>                                       4,241,707
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,308,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,827,689
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,517
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,308,270
<SALES>                                      6,591,361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,591,361
<CGS>                                        4,956,717
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,442,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                145,218
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            145,218
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   145,218
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

FELIPE ALMANZA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10036

D.C. No. 2:92-cr-00277-DAE

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

David A. Ezra, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 23, 2010** 

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Felipe Almanza appeals from the district court’s order granting his 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for sentence reduction. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

Almanza contends that the district court erred by imposing a substantively

FILED

SEP 07 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-10036

unreasonable sentence, failing to consider all the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors to

impose an individualized sentence, and treating the Sentencing Guidelines as

mandatory. These contentions are foreclosed. See Dillon v. United States, 130 S.

Ct. 2683, 2691-93 (2010).

AFFIRMED.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-15-00057-CR

MARCUS LESLIE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 5th District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-F-1027-005

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Court reporter Leslie P. Bates recorded the trial court proceedings in appellate cause 

number 06-15-00057-CR, styled Marcus Leslie v. The State of Texas, trial court cause number 

13F1027-005 in the 5th Judicial District Court of Bowie County, Texas. The reporter’s record 

was originally due in this matter June 1, 2015. That deadline was extended twice by this Court on 

Bates’ requests, resulting in the most recent due date of July 31, 2015. Bates has now filed a third 

request seeking an additional fourteen-day extension of the filing deadline.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure establish that “trial and appellate courts are jointly 

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c). The 

Rules further instruct that an “appellate court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely 

filing of the appellate record.” Id. In furtherance of our responsibilities established by the Rules, 

we find we must take steps to ensure that the record in this case is filed in a reasonable amount of 

time.

Therefore, we overrule Bates’ third request for an extension of the filing deadline and 

hereby order her to file the reporter’s record in cause number 06-15-00057-CR, styled Marcus 

Leslie v. The State of Texas, trial court cause number 13F1027-005 in the 5th Judicial District 

Court of Bowie County, Texas, to be received by this Court no later than Friday, August 14, 2015.

If the reporter’s record is not received by August 14, we warn Bates that we may begin 

contempt proceedings and order her to demonstrate why she should not be held in contempt of this 

Court for failing to obey its order.
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: August 4, 2015
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

 Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

September 16, 2016

Order 

Clerk

September 16, 2016

Rehearing No. 612

150591(83)

INNOVATION VENTURES, L.L.C., d/b/a

LIVING ESSENTIALS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 150591

v COA: 315519

Oakland CC: 2012-124554-CZ

LIQUID MANUFACTURING, L.L.C., K & L

DEVELOPMENT OF MICHIGAN, L.L.C., LXR

BIOTECH L.L.C., ETERNAL ENERGY, L.L.C.,

ANDREW KRAUSE, and PETER PAISLEY,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rehearing is considered, and it is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2273 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2273

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To extend the period during which vessels that are shorter than 79 feet 
  in length and fishing vessels are not required to have a permit for 
      discharges incidental to the normal operation of the vessel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF MORATORIUM.

    Section 2(a) of Public Law 110-299 (33 U.S.C. 1342 note) is amended 
by striking ``December 18, 2017'' and inserting ``January 19, 2018''.

            Passed the Senate December 21, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 2273

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To extend the period during which vessels that are shorter than 79 feet 
  in length and fishing vessels are not required to have a permit for 
      discharges incidental to the normal operation of the vessel.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Deafness and Other Communications Disorders Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         January 9, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 pm to 4:30 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         6120 Executive Blvd., Suite 400C, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Craig A. Jordan, Phd, Chief, Scientific Review Branch, NIH/NIDCD/DER, Executive Plaza South, Room 400C, Bethesda, MD 20892-7180, 301-496-8683.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, Biological  Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 28, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-31204 Filed 12-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Jason Parikh, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of On-Site Sourcing, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 daysprior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c) presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the designor operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there weresignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| /s/ Jason Parikh        |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
| Jason Parikh            |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| August 14, 2003         |

 

1

----
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statements No. 33-31505 on Form S-8, No. 33-50688 on Form S-8, No. 33-54387 on Form S-8, No. 33-52389 on Form S-8, No. 33-55629 on Form S-8, No. 333-32977 on Form S-8, No. 333-37145 on Form S-8,No. 333-79921 on Form S-8, No. 333-38174 on Form S-8, No. 333-53502 on Form S-8, No. 333-90954 on Form S-8, No. 333-97005 on Form S-8, No. 333-105914 on Form S-8, No. 333-138191 on Form S-8 and 333-139959 on FormS-8 of our report relating to the financial statements of AnnTaylor Stores Corporation dated March 16, 2007, (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)) and our report onmanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting dated March 16, 2007, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AnnTaylor Stores Corporation for the year ended February 3, 2007. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

New York, NY 

March 22, 2007
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2448 

To provide for the issuance of a rule to advance next-generation technologies 

to provide alternatives to hydrofluorocarbons, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2018 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself, Mr. CARPER, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. COONS, Ms. COLLINS, and Mr. MERKLEY) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To provide for the issuance of a rule to advance next-generation technologies to provide alternatives to hydrofluorocarbons, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Innovation 

5 and Manufacturing Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PHASING DOWN HYDROFLUOROCARBONS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than December 31, 

8 2018, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

9 Agency (referred to in this section as the ‘‘AdminisVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:36 Feb 21, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2448.IS S2448

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2448 IS

1 trator’’) shall issue one or more rules to phasedown hydro2 fluorocarbons through an allowance allocation and trading 

3 program and the advancement of environmentally friendly 

4 technologies, including new compounds, blends, and other 

5 substances (such as refrigerants, solvents, fire retardants, 

6 foam blowing agents, aerosols, and propellants). 

7 (b) REQUIREMENTS.—A rule issued under subsection 

8 (a) shall— 

9 (1) be issued, reviewed, and enforced in the 

10 same manner as rules issued pursuant to title VI of 

11 the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7671 et seq.); 

12 (2) conform to the Montreal Protocol on Sub13 stances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, done at Mon14 treal on September 16, 1987 (including the hydro15 fluorocarbon phasedown schedule agreed to by par16 ties to the Montreal Protocol on October 15, 2016); 

17 (3) provide for the improvement of refrigerant 

18 management programs, including reclamation; and 

19 (4) be designed— 

20 (A) to promote and support economic de21 velopment; 

22 (B) to maximize protections for human 

23 health and the environment; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2448 IS

1 (C) to minimize economic costs to hydro2 fluorocarbon producers, reclaimers, and user 

3 entities; 

4 (D) to maximize flexibility for hydrofluoro5 carbon producers, reclaimers, and user entities; 

6 and 

7 (E) to minimize any additional costs to 

8 consumers. 

9 (c) NEGOTIATIONS WITH STAKEHOLDERS.—In 

10 issuing a rule under subsection (a), as the Administrator 

11 determines to be appropriate, the Administrator may con12 sider negotiating with all relevant stakeholders, in accord13 ance with the negotiated rulemaking procedure under sub14 chapter III of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code 

15 (commonly known as the ‘‘Negotiated Rulemaking Act of 

16 1990’’). 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1345 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to eliminate the discriminatory treatment of the District of Columbia under 

the provisions of law commonly referred to as the ‘‘Hatch 

Act’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1345 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia 

3 Hatch Act Reform Act of 2009’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EMPLOYEES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TO BE 

5 SUBJECT TO THE SAME RESTRICTIONS ON 

6 POLITICAL ACTIVITY AS APPLY TO STATE 

7 AND LOCAL EMPLOYEES. 

8 (a) APPLICABILITY OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO

9 STATE AND LOCAL EMPLOYEES.—Section 1501(1) of title 

10 5, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘a State 

11 or territory’’ and inserting ‘‘a State, the District of Co12 lumbia, or a territory’’. 

13 (b) PROVISIONS RELATING TO FEDERAL EMPLOYEES

14 MADE INAPPLICABLE.—Section 7322(1) of such title is 

15 amended— 

16 (1) by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end of subpara17 graph (A); 

18 (2) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph 

19 (B); 

20 (3) by striking subparagraph (C); and 

21 (4) by striking ‘‘services;’’ and inserting ‘‘serv22 ices or an individual employed or holding office in 

23 the government of the District of Columbia;’’. 

24 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

25 The amendments made by this Act— 
3 

•HR 1345 EH

1 (1) shall take effect on the effective date of a 

2 law, enacted by the government of the District of 

3 Columbia after the date of the enactment of this 

4 Act, which places restrictions on political activities of 

5 employees of the government of the District of Co6 lumbia; and 

7 (2) shall apply with respect to actions occurring 

8 on or after the effective date referred to in para9 graph (1). 

Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1345 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to eliminate 

referred to as the ‘‘Hatch Act’’. Columbia under the provisions of law commonly the discriminatory treatment of the District of