[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 10, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 73312-73316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20152]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 89 , No. 175 / Tuesday, September 10, 2024 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 73312]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

10 CFR Part 1008

[DOE-HQ-2023-0058]
RIN 1903-AA18


Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE, the Department) is proposing to 
revise its regulations to exempt certain records maintained under a 
newly established system of records--DOE-85, Research, Technology, and 
Economic Security Due Diligence Review Records--from the notification 
and access provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974. The Department 
proposes to exempt portions of this system of records from these 
subsections of the Privacy Act because of requirements related to 
classified information.

DATES: To be assured of consideration, written comments on this 
proposed rulemaking must be received at one of the addresses listed in 
the ADDRESSES section, on or before October 10, 2024. Comments received 
following the aforementioned date may be considered if it is practical 
to do so.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to section V (Public Participation--Submission 
of Comments) for additional information on the comment period. To 
comment on the System of Records Notice (SORN) associated with this 
proposed rulemaking, which is published elsewhere in this issue of the 
Federal Register, please refer to that SORN's own Federal Register 
Notice, using docket number DOE-HQ-2023-0058.
    You may submit comments identified by docket number DOE-HQ-2023-
0058, as follows:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Include the docket 
number DOE-HQ-2023-0058 in the ``Enter Keyword or ID'' field and click 
on ``Search.'' On the next web page, click on ``Submit a Comment'' 
action and follow the instructions in the portal.
    Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier [For paper, disk, or CD-ROM submissions] 
to: Ken Hunt, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, 
Office 8H-085, Washington, DC 20585.
    Comments received, including any personal information, will be 
posted without change to www.regulations.gov.
    Docket: The docket, which includes Federal Register notices, 
comments, and other supporting documents/materials, is available for 
review at www.regulations.gov. All documents in the docket are listed 
in the www.regulations.gov index. However, some documents listed in the 
index, such as those containing information that is exempt from public 
disclosure, may not be publicly available. The www.regulations.gov web 
page contains instructions on how to access all documents, including 
public comments, in the docket. See section V of this document for 
further information on how to submit comments through 
www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle David, U.S. Department of Energy, 
1000 Independence Avenue SW, Office 8H-085, Washington, DC 20585; 
facsimile: (202) 586-8151; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e5547525b105a5f48575a7e564f105a515b10595148"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fb9082979ed59f9a8d929fbb938ad59f949ed59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>, telephone: 
(240) 686-9485.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Authority and Background
    A. Authority
    B. Background
II. Discussion
III. Section 1008.12 Analysis
IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
    A. Review Under Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094
    B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
    C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
    D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
    E. Review Under Executive Order 12988
    F. Review Under Executive Order 13132
    G. Review Under Executive Order 13175
    H. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
    I. Review Under Executive Order 12360
    J. Review Under Executive Order 13211
    K. Review Under the Treasury and General Government 
Appropriations Act, 1999
    L. Review Under the Treasury and General Government 
Appropriations Act, 2001
V. Public Participation--Submission of Comments
VI. Approval by the Office of the Secretary of Energy

I. Authority and Background

A. Authority

    DOE has broad authority to manage the agency's collection, use, 
processing, maintenance, storage, and disclosure of Personally 
Identifiable Information (PII) pursuant to the following authorities: 
42 United States Code (U.S.C.) 7101 et seq., 50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq., 5 
U.S.C. 1104, 5 U.S.C. 552, 5 U.S.C. 552a, 42 U.S.C. 7254, 5 U.S.C. 301, 
and 42 U.S.C. 405 note.

B. Background

    The Privacy Act of 1974 (the Act) (5 U.S.C. 552a) embodies fair 
information practice principles in a statutory framework governing the 
means by which the U.S. Government collects, maintains, uses, and 
disseminates personally identifiable information. The Privacy Act 
applies to information that is maintained in a ``system of records.'' A 
``system of records'' is a group of any records under the control of an 
agency from which information is retrieved by the name of the 
individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying 
particular assigned to the individual. In the Privacy Act, an 
individual is defined to encompass U.S. citizens and lawful permanent 
residents.
    The Privacy Act includes two sets of provisions that allow agencies 
to claim exemptions from certain requirements in the statute. These 
provisions allow agencies in certain circumstances to promulgate rules 
to exempt a system of records from certain provisions of the Privacy 
Act. For this system of records, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1), the 
Department exempts this system of records from subsections (c)(3); (d); 
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (4)(H), and (4)(I); and (f) of the Privacy Act. This 
exemption is needed to protect information relating to DOE activities 
from disclosure to subjects or others related to these activities. 
Specifically, the exemption is required to safeguard classified 
information. Pursuant to the Privacy Act and Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) Circular A-108, Federal Agency Responsibilities for 
Review, Reporting, and Publication under the Privacy Act, DOE is 
issuing this notice of proposed rulemaking to make clear to the public 
the reasons why this particular

[[Page 73313]]

exemption is being proposed and to seek public comment.

II. Discussion

    The Department is giving notice of its intention to exempt portions 
of a newly established system of records--DOE-85, Research, Technology, 
and Economic Security Due Diligence Review Records--from subsections 
(c)(3); (d); (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (4)(H), and (4)(I); and (f) of the 
Privacy Act of 1974. To claim this exemption, DOE is amending 10 CFR 
1008.12 by adding a new paragraph, (b)(1)(ii)(O). The Department 
proposes to exempt portions of this system of records from these 
subsections of the Privacy Act because of requirements related to 
classified information.
    The purpose of this system is to enhance DOE's capabilities to 
aggregate, link, analyze and maintain information used by the 
Department to assess research, technology, and economic security (RTES) 
risk. RTES risks may include risk of foreign government interference 
and exploitation, intellectual property (IP) loss, national security 
risk, conflicts of interest, and conflicts of commitment, and other 
parameters defined in DOE/NNSA policy. The RTES analysis builds on pre-
existing information provided by individuals and organizations that 
interact with DOE/NNSA, paired with public records (see categories of 
records), and in some cases, classified information. Consistent with 
NSPM-33, applicable law, and existing DOE/NNSA policies, the system 
records may be shared as appropriate with other Federal funding 
agencies and internally within DOE/NNSA to help ensure a coordinated 
and consistent approach to risk assessment.
    For this system of records, the system is exempted from subsections 
(c)(3); (d); (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (4)(H), and (4)(I); and (f) of the 
Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1). This exemption is needed 
to protect information relating to DOE activities from disclosure to 
subjects or others related to these activities. Specifically, the 
exemption is required to safeguard classified information.
    The exemption proposed here is a standard national security 
exemption exercised by many Federal intelligence agencies. Although the 
Research, Technology, and Economic Security (RTES) Office is not an 
intelligence agency, the system of records utilized by the RTES Office 
may include classified information obtained from Federal intelligence 
sources.
    A System of Records Notice for DOE-85 Research, Technology, and 
Economic Security Due Diligence Review Records is also published 
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.
    Exemptions for DOE-85 Research, Technology, and Economic Security 
Due Diligence Review Records from this particular subsection of the Act 
are justified, on a case-by-case basis to be determined at the time a 
request is made for the following reasons:
    From subsection (k)(1) because providing individuals access to 
classified information could cause serious damage to the national 
defense or foreign policy.

III. Section 1008.12 Analysis

    This notice of proposed rulemaking proposes adding paragraph 
(b)(1)(ii)(O), referencing ``Research, Technology, and Economic 
Security Due Diligence Review Records (DOE-85)''. This addition will 
demonstrate that SORN DOE-85 is included among the other SORNs taking a 
(k)(1) exemption under the Privacy Act of 1974. Per current regulations 
located at 10 CFR 1008.12(b)(1)(ii), this exemption allows DOE to 
``prevent serious damage to the national defense or foreign policy that 
could arise from providing individuals access to classified 
information.''

IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review

A. Review Under Executive Order 12866, 13563, and 14094

    Executive Order (``E.O.'') 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and 
Review,'' 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993), as supplemented and reaffirmed by 
E.O. 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' 76 FR 3821 
(Jan. 21, 2011) and amended by E.O. 14094, ``Modernizing Regulatory 
Review,'' 88 FR 21879 (April 11, 2023), requires agencies, to the 
extent permitted by law, to (1) propose or adopt a regulation only upon 
a reasoned determination that its benefits justify its costs 
(recognizing that some benefits and costs are difficult to quantify); 
(2) tailor regulations to impose the least burden on society, 
consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives, taking into account, 
among other things, and to the extent practicable, the costs of 
cumulative regulations; (3) select, in choosing among alternative 
regulatory approaches, those approaches that maximize net benefits 
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, 
and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity); (4) to the 
extent feasible, specify performance objectives, rather than specifying 
the behavior or manner of compliance that regulated entities must 
adopt; and (5) identify and assess available alternatives to direct 
regulation, including providing economic incentives to encourage the 
desired behavior, such as user fees or marketable permits, or providing 
information upon which choices can be made by the public. DOE 
emphasizes as well that E.O. 13563 requires agencies to use the best 
available techniques to quantify anticipated present and future 
benefits and costs as accurately as possible. In its guidance, the 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) has emphasized that 
such techniques may include identifying changing future compliance 
costs that might result from technological innovation or anticipated 
behavioral changes. For the reasons stated in this preamble, this 
proposed regulatory action is consistent with these principles.
    Section 6(a) of E.O. 12866 requires agencies to submit 
``significant regulatory actions'' to OIRA for review. OIRA has 
determined that this proposed regulatory action is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' within the scope of E.O. 12866. Accordingly, this 
action is not subject to review under E.O. 12866 by OIRA of the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB).

B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) 
requires that an agency prepare an initial regulatory flexibility 
analysis for any regulation for which a general notice of proposed 
rulemaking is required, unless the agency certifies that the rule, if 
promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities (5 U.S.C. 605(b)). As required by 
Executive Order 13272, Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency 
Rulemaking, 67 FR 53461 (Aug. 16, 2002), DOE published procedures and 
policies on February 19, 2003, to ensure that the potential impacts of 
its rules on small entities are properly considered during the 
rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE has made its procedures and 
policies available on the Office of the General Counsel's website 
(www.energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel).
    DOE reviewed this proposed rule under the provisions of the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act and the procedures and policies published on 
February 19, 2003. DOE certifies that the proposed rule, if adopted, 
would not have significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities. The factual basis for this certification is set forth 
below.

[[Page 73314]]

    This proposed rule would update DOE's policies and procedures 
concerning the disclosure of records held within a system of records 
pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974. This proposed rule would apply 
only to activities conducted by DOE's Federal employees and 
contractors, who would be responsible for implementing the rule 
requirements. DOE does not expect there to be any potential economic 
impact of this proposed rule on small businesses. Small businesses, 
therefore, should not be adversely impacted by the requirements in this 
proposed rule. For these reasons, DOE certifies that this proposed 
rule, if promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities, and therefore, no regulatory 
flexibility analysis has been prepared.

C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This proposed rule does not impose a collection of information 
requirement subject to review and approval by OMB under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969

    Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 
DOE has analyzed this proposed action in accordance with NEPA and DOE's 
NEPA implementing regulations (10 CFR part 1021). DOE's regulations 
include a categorical exclusion (CX) for rulemakings interpreting or 
amending an existing rule or regulation that does not change the 
environmental effect of the rule or regulation being amended. 10 CFR 
part 1021, subpart D, appendix A, paragraph A5. DOE has determined that 
this proposed rule is covered under the CX found in DOE's NEPA 
regulations at paragraph A5 of appendix A to subpart D, 10 CFR part 
1021, because it is an amendment to an existing regulation that does 
not change the environmental effect of the amended regulation and, 
therefore, meets the requirements for the application of this CX. See 
10 CFR 1021.410. Therefore, DOE has determined that this proposed rule 
is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of 
the human environment within the meaning of NEPA and does not require 
an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement.

E. Review Under Executive Order 12988

    With respect to the review of existing regulations and the 
promulgation of new regulations, Section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988, 
``Civil Justice Reform,'' 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996), imposes on 
Federal agencies the general duty to adhere to the following 
requirements: (1) eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write 
regulations to minimize litigation; (3) provide a clear legal standard 
for affected conduct rather than a general standard; and (4) promote 
simplification and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of Executive Order 
12988 specifically requires that executive agencies make every 
reasonable effort to ensure the regulation: (1) clearly specifies the 
preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly specifies any effect on existing 
Federal law or regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard for the 
affected conduct while promoting simplification and burden reduction; 
(4) specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately defines 
key terms; (6) specifies whether administrative proceedings are to be 
required before parties may file suit in court and, if so, describes 
those proceedings and requires the exhaustion of administrative 
remedies; and (7) addresses other important issues affecting clarity 
and general draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the Attorney 
General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires Executive 
agencies to review regulations in light of applicable standards in 
section 3(a) and section 3(b) to determine whether they are met or it 
is unreasonable to meet one or more of the standards. DOE has completed 
the required review and determined that, to the extent permitted by 
law, this proposed rule meets the relevant standards of Executive Order 
12988.

F. Review Under Executive Order 13132

    Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' 64 FR 43255 (August 10, 
1999), imposes certain requirements on agencies formulating and 
implementing policies or regulations that preempt State law or that 
have federalism implications. Agencies are required to examine the 
constitutional and statutory authority supporting any action that would 
limit the policymaking discretion of the States and carefully assess 
the necessity for such actions. The Executive order also requires 
agencies to have an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely 
input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory 
policies that have federalism implications. On March 14, 2000, DOE 
published a statement of policy describing the intergovernmental 
consultation process it will follow in the development of such 
regulations. 65 FR 13735. DOE has examined this proposed rule and has 
tentatively determined that it would not preempt State law and would 
not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. 
No further action is required by Executive Order 13132.

G. Review Under Executive Order 13175

    Under Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000) on 
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,'' DOE 
may not issue a discretionary rule that has ``Tribal'' implications and 
imposes substantial direct compliance costs on Indian Tribal 
governments. DOE has determined that this proposed rule would not have 
such effects and concluded that Executive Order 13175 does not apply to 
this proposed rule.

H. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-4) requires each Federal agency to assess the effects of a 
Federal regulatory action on State, local, and Tribal governments, and 
the private sector. (Pub. L. 104-4, sec. 201 et seq. (codified at 2 
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)). For a proposed regulatory action likely to 
result in a rule that may cause the expenditure by State, local, and 
Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 
million or more in any one year (adjusted annually for inflation), 
section 202 of UMRA requires a Federal agency to publish a written 
statement that estimates the resulting costs, benefits, and other 
effects on the national economy. (2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b)) UMRA also 
requires a Federal agency to develop an effective process to permit 
timely input by elected officers of State, local, and Tribal 
governments on a proposed ``significant Federal intergovernmental 
mandate,'' and requires an agency plan for giving notice and 
opportunity for timely input to potentially affected small governments 
before establishing any requirements that might significantly or 
uniquely affect them. On March 18, 1997, DOE published a statement of 
policy on its process for intergovernmental consultation under UMRA. 
(62 FR 12820) (This policy is also available at: www.energy.gov/gc/guidance-opinions under ``Guidance & Opinions'' (Rulemaking).) DOE 
examined this proposed rule according to UMRA and its statement of 
policy and has determined that this proposed rule contains neither an 
intergovernmental mandate, nor a mandate that may result in the 
expenditure by State, local, and

[[Page 73315]]

Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 
million or more in any year. Accordingly, no further assessment or 
analysis is required under UMRA.

I. Review Under Executive Order 12630

    DOE has determined, under Executive Order 12630, ``Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights'' 53 FR 8859 (March 18, 1988), that this proposed regulation 
would not result in any takings that might require compensation under 
the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

J. Review Under Executive Order 13211

    Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR 28355 
(May 22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to the 
OIRA, which is part of OMB, a Statement of Energy Effects for any 
proposed significant energy action. A ``significant energy action'' is 
defined as any action by an agency that promulgates or is expected to 
lead to promulgation of a final rule, and that: (1)(i) is a significant 
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, or any successor order; 
and (ii) is likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, 
distribution, or use of energy, or (2) is designated by the 
Administrator of OIRA as a significant energy action. For any proposed 
significant energy action, the agency must give a detailed statement of 
any adverse effects on energy supply, distribution, or use should the 
proposal be implemented, and of reasonable alternatives to the action 
and their expected benefits on energy supply, distribution, and use. 
This proposed regulatory action is not a significant energy action. 
Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.

K. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 
1999

    Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations 
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a Family 
Policymaking Assessment for any proposed rule that may affect family 
well-being. This proposed rule would not have any impact on the 
autonomy or integrity of the family as an institution. Accordingly, DOE 
has concluded that it is not necessary to prepare a Family Policymaking 
Assessment.

L. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 
2001

    Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations 
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516) provides for Federal agencies to review most 
disseminations of information to the public under guidelines 
established by each agency pursuant to general guidelines issued by 
OMB. OMB's guidelines were published at 67 FR 8452 (February 22, 2002), 
and DOE's guidelines were published at 67 FR 62446 (October 7, 2002). 
Pursuant to OMB Memorandum M-19-15, Improving Implementation of the 
Information Quality Act (April 24, 2019), DOE published updated 
guidelines which are available at: www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/12/f70/DOE%20Final%20Updated%20IQA%20Guidelines%20Dec%202019.pdf.
    DOE has reviewed this proposed rule and will ensure that 
information produced under this regulation remains consistent with the 
applicable OMB and DOE guidelines.

V. Public Participation--Submission of Comments

    DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding this 
proposed rule before or no later than the date provided in the DATES 
section at the beginning of this proposed rule. Interested individuals 
are invited to participate in this proceeding by submitting data, 
views, or arguments with respect to this proposed rule using the method 
described in the ADDRESSES section at the beginning of this proposed 
rule. To help the Department review the submitted comments, commenters 
are requested to reference the paragraph(s), (e.g., Sec.  1008.22(d)), 
to which they refer where possible. Individuals that want to comment on 
this proposed rulemaking may do so by following the directions below. 
To comment on the System of Records Notice (SORN) associated with this 
rulemaking, which is also published elsewhere in this issue of the 
Federal Register, please refer to that SORN's own Federal Register 
Notice, using docket number DOE-HQ-2023-0058.
    1. Submitting comments www.regulations.gov. The www.regulations.gov 
web page will require you to provide your name and contact information. 
Your contact information will be viewable by DOE's Office of Privacy 
Management and Compliance staff only. Your contact information will not 
be publicly viewable except for your first and last names, organization 
name (if any), and submitter representative name (if any). If your 
comment is not processed properly because of technical difficulties, 
DOE will use this information to contact you. If DOE cannot read your 
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for 
clarification, DOE may not be able to consider your comment. However, 
your contact information will be publicly viewable if you include it in 
the comment itself or in any documents attached to your comment. Any 
information that you do not want to be publicly viewable should not be 
included in your comment, nor in any document attached to your comment. 
Persons viewing comments will see only first and last names, 
organization names, correspondence containing comments, and any 
documents submitted with the comments.
    Do not submit to www.regulations.gov information for which 
disclosure is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and 
commercial or financial information (hereinafter referred to as 
Confidential Business Information (CBI)). Comments submitted through 
www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed as CBI. Comments received through 
www.regulations.gov will waive any CBI claims for the information 
submitted. For information on submitting CBI, see the Confidential 
Business Information section.
    DOE processes submissions made through www.regulations.gov before 
posting. Normally, comments will be posted within a few days of being 
submitted. However, if large volumes of comments are being processed 
simultaneously, your comment may not be viewable for up to several 
weeks. Please keep the comment tracking number that www.regulations.gov 
provides after you have successfully uploaded your comment.
    Comments, data, and other information submitted to DOE 
electronically should be provided in PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or 
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file format. Provide documents that 
are not secured, that are written in English, and that are free of any 
defects or viruses. Documents should not contain special characters or 
any form of encryption and, if possible, they should carry the 
electronic signature of the author.
    2. Confidential Business Information. Pursuant to the provisions of 
10 CFR 1004.11, anyone submitting information or data he or she 
believes to be confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure 
should submit two well-marked copies: one copy of the document marked 
``CONFIDENTIAL''

[[Page 73316]]

including all the information believed to be confidential, and one copy 
of the document marked ``NON-CONFIDENTIAL'' with the information 
believed to be confidential deleted. Submit these documents via email. 
DOE will make its own determination as to the confidentiality of the 
information and treat it according to its determination.
    It is DOE's policy that all comments may be included in the public 
docket, without change and as received, including any personal 
information provided in the comments (except information deemed to be 
exempt from public disclosure).
    3. Campaign form letters. Please submit campaign form letters by 
the originating organization in batches of between 50 to 500 form 
letters per PDF or as one form letter with a list of supporters' names 
compiled into one or more PDFs. This reduces comment processing and 
posting time.

VI. Approval by the Office of the Secretary of Energy

    The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of this notice of 
proposed rulemaking.

List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 1008

    Administration practice and procedure, Freedom of information, 
Privacy, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Signing Authority

    This document of the Department of Energy was signed on September 
3, 2024, by Ann Dunkin, Senior Agency Official for Privacy, pursuant to 
delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy. That document with 
the original signature and date is maintained by DOE. For 
administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of 
the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE Federal 
Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the 
document in electronic format for publication, as an official document 
of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no way 
alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the 
Federal Register.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on September 3, 2024.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of Energy 
proposes to amend part 1008 of chapter X of title 10 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations as set forth below:

PART 1008--RECORDS MAINTAINED ON INDIVIDUALS (PRIVACY ACT)

0
1. The authority citation for part 1008 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq.; 5 
U.S.C. 552; 5 U.S.C. 552a; 42 U.S.C. 7254; and 5 U.S.C. 301. Section 
1008.22(c) also issued under 42 U.S.C. 405 note.

0
2. Section 1008.12, as proposed to be amended at 88 FR 82788 (November 
27, 2023), is further amended by adding paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(O) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  1008.12  Exemptions.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (O) Research, Technology, and Economic Security Due Diligence 
Review Records (DOE-85).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2024-20152 Filed 9-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>