alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The North Dayton Savings & Loan Assn., Appellee, *v.*The United States Casualty Co., Appellant.

(No. 28624

Decided June 18, 1941.)

*Mrt Allen C. McDonald,*for appellee.

*Mr. Clifford R. Curtner,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.

Matthias, J., not participating.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21(b)

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY
                             As of December 31, 1999

[Numbers on left are Dun & Bradstreet hierarchy (tier level) indicators.]

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                Subsidiary Name                                                 Jurisdiction
                                                                                of Formation
<S>      <C>                                                                    <C>
01       CMS Engineering Co.                                                    Michigan
01       CMS Midland Holdings Company                                           Michigan
01       CMS Midland, Inc.                                                      Michigan
01       Consumers EnergyGuard Services, Inc.                                   Michigan
01       ES Services Company                                                    Michigan
01       Huron Hydrocarbons, Inc.                                               Michigan
01       MEC Development Corp.                                                  Michigan
01       Michigan Gas Storage Company                                           Michigan

</TABLE>

Additional subsidiaries, unnamed above, when considered in the aggregate as a
single subsidiary would not be considered a significant subsidiary.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A1 26 2 . THORNLEY FORREST v . DAYTONI A FORREST.

Th o rn l ey Fo rres t fi l ed t h i s d i rect ap p eal o f t h e t ri al co urt ’ s o rd er fi n di n g h i m i n wi l l fu l co n t em

p t o f t h e p art i es ’ d i v o rce d ecree. W e l ack ju ri s d ict i o n

. Ap p eal s fro m o rd ers en t ered i n d o m es t i c r e l a ti o n s cas es , i n cl ud i n g o rd ers h o l d i n g p ers o ns i n co n t em p t o f di v o rce d ecrees , m u s t co m e b y ap p l icat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (2 ); s ee al s o No r ma n v. Au l t , 2 8 7 Ga.
3 2 4 , 3 3 0 -3 3 1 (6 ) (6 9 5 SE2 d 6 3 3 ) (2 0 1 0 ); Ru s s o v. Ma n n i n g , 2 52 Ga. 1 5 5 , 1 5 5 -1 5 6 (3 1 2 SE2 d 3 1 9) (1 9 84 ). “ Co m p l i an ce wi th t h e d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal s pr o c e d u r e i s ju ri s d i ct i o n a l

. ” S

m o a k v. Dep t. o

f Hu ma n Res o u rces , 2 2 1 Ga. Ap p

. 25 7
, 2 5 7 (4 7 1
SE2 d 6 0 ) (1 9 9 6). Th o rn l ey Fo rres t ’ s fai l u re t o fo ll o w t h e req u i red a p p el l at e
p ro ced ure d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s d i ct i on o v er t h i s ap peal
, wh i ch i s h ereb y D ISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. March 06, 2020

03/06/2020
Martin, Michael (OST) 

Subject: FW: CLARIFICATION: EAS Proposals for Crescent City, CA 

From: Martin, Michael (OST) 

Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 2:08 PM 

Subject: CLARIFICATION: EAS Proposals for Crescent City, CA 

Everyone: 

Crescent City's current EAS selection order (Order 2014-4-23) states that SkyWest provide 14 round trips per week using 

30-passenger EMB-120 aircraft. Order 2014-11-18, which requested proposals for EAS at Crescent City, stated that the 

Department would accept proposals for 12 round trips per week for aircraft seating 19 to 50 passengers. 

The Department wishes to clarify that it will accept proposals at Crescent City for 14 round trips per week for aircraft 

seating 19 to 50 passengers. 

Should you have questions, feel free to contact me. 

Regards, 

Michael Martin 

United States Department of Transportation 

Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) 

(202) 366-6494 

1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0653

IN THE MATTER OF:

H.M., 

A Youth.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 14, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 1 2022

11/01/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0653
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CARMELITA FOREMAN,

Petitioner

v.

SANJAY GURUNATHAN AND VINDYA

RAGHAVACHARI,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 99 MM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17 th day of November , 2023, the Petition for Leave to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
1

Memo 

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799 

From: Joseph McDonald, U.S. EPA-OTAQ-ASD 

CC: Ed Nam, U.S. EPA-OTAQ-ASD 

Date: October 6, 2010 

Re: Automotive News article on Hyundai Sonata Hybrid 

A hard copy of the August 2, 2010 Automotive News article entitled “"Hyundai ups tech ante with 

Sonata Hybrid” is available within EPA’s Docket Center. 

The article has been copyrighted and is not available within the electronic docket. Parties that wish to 

view a hard copy of this document can do so at the at the EPA Docket Center: Air and Radiation 

Docket and Information Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, 

Washington DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-

1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY


ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MEDITE Cancer
Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
E. Patterson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





Date:
April 14, 2017


/s/ David E.
PattersonDavid E. PattersonPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-4440

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GARRON TAUFEEQ SPARKS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, 

District Judge. (1:13-cr-00357-TDS-1)

Submitted: November 24, 2014 Decided: December 4, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, Greg Davis, Assistant 

Federal Public Defender, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for 

Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, Stephen T. 

Inman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Garron Taufeeq Sparks pled guilty to possession of a 

firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 922(g)(1) (2012). The district court sentenced him to a 

Guidelines sentence of fifty-five months’ imprisonment. Sparks

appeals, claiming that his sentence is substantively 

unreasonable. We affirm. 

We review the district court’s sentence, “whether 

inside, just outside, or significantly outside the Guidelines 

range[,]” for reasonableness “under a deferential abuse-ofdiscretion standard.” Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 41, 

51 (2007). Because Sparks does not challenge the procedural 

reasonableness of his sentence, we turn our attention to 

substantive reasonableness, “tak[ing] into account the totality 

of the circumstances.” Id. at 51. “Any sentence that is within 

or below a properly calculated Guidelines range is presumptively 

reasonable[,]” and this “presumption can only be rebutted by 

showing that the sentence is unreasonable when measured against 

the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) [(2012)] factors.” United States v. 

Louthian, 756 F.3d 295, 306 (4th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, __

U.S.L.W. __, 2014 WL 4717386 (U.S. Oct. 20, 2014) (No. 14-336).

Sparks asserts that the district court inadequately 

considered his youth when imposing a Guidelines sentence. We 

disagree. The district court expressly relied on Sparks’ age as 
3

its basis for imposing a sentence near the low end of the 

Guidelines range, while also taking into account Sparks’ 

criminal history, which included two prior convictions for 

illegal gun possession. Sparks has not shown that this sentence 

is unreasonable when measured against the § 3553(a) factors.

Accordingly, we hold that the Guidelines sentence 

imposed by the district court is substantively reasonable, and 

we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7333

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TIMOTHY SMITH, a/k/a Little Boo,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:12-cr-00220-D-2)

Submitted: January 22, 2019 Decided: January 25, 2019

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Smith appeals the district court’s order denying Smith’s 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the

United States Sentencing Guidelines. Based on our review of the record, we conclude 

that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion based on the 

serious risk a reduction in Smith’s sentence would pose to public safety. See United 

States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193, 195 (4th Cir. 2013) (“Whether to reduce a sentence and to 

what extent is a matter within the district court’s discretion.”). Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Smith, No. 5:12-cr00220-D-2 (E.D.N.C. May 19, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.40**Employment Agreement**     This employment agreement (“Agreement”), made and entered into this 20st day ofNovember 2006, by and between CytoCore, Inc., with its principal place of business at 414 NorthOrleans Court, Suite 502 in Chicago, Illinois 60610 (the “Company”) and Robert McCullough Jr., 227South Ridgewood, Kentfield, CA 94904 ( “McCullough”).**Background**     McCullough provides a variety of financial and business services as part of his duties asChief Financial Officer for CytoCore, and is ready, willing, and able to provide such assistanceto the Company on the terms and conditions set forth herein.     The Company is in the process of developing a series of medical devices, drug deliverySystems, and other cervical and uterine cancer related medical Systems. In pursuit of its businessstrategy the Company desires to retain the services of McCullough under the terms and conditionsset forth herein.     **NOW THEREFORE,**for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which ishereby acknowledged, the Company and McCullough agree as follows: 1. Engagement and Scope of Services.  1.1 Company hereby retains McCullough and McCullough agrees to provide to theCompany the employment services which are more fully described below:    Employment duties will involve but are not limited to interaction with the Company’sChief Executive Officer, Medical Advisory Board, other Officers, or consultantsrelated to or regarding the Company’s business plans, operations, commercializationof medical devices, and other business matters that fall within McCullough’s area ofexpertise. McCullough will report directly to the Board of Directors and the AuditCommittee comprised of members of the Board of Directors    McCullough will be responsible for the financial accounting and reporting of thestate of the Company’s financial operations and condition in accordance with rulesand regulations promulgated by regulatory authorities. McCullough has the authorityto hire necessary personnel and consultants to achieve this objective. and dischargesame. McCullough will be responsible for generating financial projections and willhave direct access to all personnel and consultants employed by the Company in orderto obtain necessary information for such projections. Company will provide directaccess to all computers and computer generated information required for financialstatement preparation. Company will reimburse McCullough. for attending seminars thatMcCullough feels are essential to perform the duties listed abovel of 6
# Jornal Oficial C 265A/13 d

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 265A |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 58.° ano13 de agosto de 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 265A

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

58.° ano13 de agosto de 2015

---

| Número de informação | Índice | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avisos |
| | PROCEDIMENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS |
| | Conselho |
| 2015/C 265A/01 | Aviso de anulação | 1 |

Número de informação

Índice

Página

V   Avisos

PROCEDIMENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Conselho

2015/C 265A/01

Aviso de anulação

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

V Avisos

PROCEDIMENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Conselho

| 13.8.2015 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CA 265/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2015

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CA 265/1

---

AVISO DE ANULAÇÃO

(2015/C 265 A/01)

É anulado o processo de seleção CONS/AD/113:

| — | Diretor(a), Serviço Jurídico, Direção 3 (Relações Externas), |
| --- | --- |

—

Diretor(a), Serviço Jurídico, Direção 3 (Relações Externas),

cujo aviso foi publicado no Jornal Oficial da União Europeia
   (1).

---

(1)  JO C 119 A de 14.4.2015, p. 18.

---
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Case No. DA 20

- 0086

**_______________________** THE STATE OF MONTANA, THE MONTANA PETROLEUM TANK RELEASE COMPENSATION BOARD,

Plaintiffs an d A

ppellants, v. ORDER BP plc, BP HOLDINGS NORTH AMERICA LIMITED, BP AMERICA INC, BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA INC., BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC, and its predecessor companies and subsidiaries, including but not limited to Standard Oil of Ohio (SOHIO), Standard Oil (Indiana), Amoco Corporation, Am oco Oil Company, Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) and BP Amoco plc,

Defendants and Appellees.

**_____________**

**_ __________**  Ha ving reviewed the Unopposed Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Appeal filed by Appellants, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal in this matter is dismissed. Each party will bear their own costs and fees.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 8 2020

08/10/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0086
steam_record - Re: ICR Questionnaire- Request for Extension 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

-----"Green, Michael" <MGreen@gwfpower.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Green, Michael" <MGreen@gwfpower.com> 

Date: 06/25/2010 01:29PM 

cc: "Kehoe, Mark" <mkehoe@gwfpower.com>, "Nevarez, Neftali" <nnevarez@gwfpower.com> 

Subject: ICR Questionnaire- Request for Extension 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Green, Michael" <MGreen@gwfpower.com>

Date: 6/28/2010 3:51 PM

Subject: Re: ICR Questionnaire- Request for Extension

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C28C4F4DO... 3/17/2011
Dear Ms. Alicea;

GWF Power Systems Co. hereby submits our request for an extension to complete the Clean Water Act ICR 

ERRATA Sheet- Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines. Please see 

attached pdf document.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Best Regards;

Michael Green

Environmental Specialist

GWF Power Systems

4300 Railroad Ave.

Pittsburg, CA 94565

Direct (925)431-1442

Mobile (925)260-4102

Fax (925)431-0514

mgreen@gwfpower.com

NOTICE: This communication is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed, is not encrypted, may be attorney-client privileged and may 

contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may have received this communication in error, please reply 

to the sender indicating that fact and delete the copy you received. In addition, you should not copy, re-transmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the 

information. Thank you. 

[attachment "ERRATA Questionnaire Extension Request 062410.pdf" removed by Jezebele 

Alicea/DC/USEPA/US] 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C28C4F4DO... 3/17/2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,020
<SECURITIES>                                    26,561
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,156
<PP&E>                                           7,303
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,568)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,568
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,891
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,035
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,266
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,838)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,838)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,838)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.79)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001012444
<NAME> CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS SOUTHEAST, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,609,386
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,063,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (278,819)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,081,714
<PP&E>                                     146,676,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             541,557,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,551,817
<BONDS>                                    381,900,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 135,744,135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               541,557,118
<SALES>                                     31,978,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,978,181
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,467,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               561,940
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,439,965
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,491,140)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,491,140)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,491,140)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>