1 

### SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST ( I n accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)

SIP Submitted by: TCEQ

Date Submitted: April 13, 2012 Subject: Regulation No. 1 1 7

– Control of Air Pollution from Nitrogen Compounds

– Removal of References to System Cap Trading 

### Completeness Review Completed by: Alan Shar; Date Completed: September 2012

Administrative Material s

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL Acceptable ?

Y N

1. The package is sent with a formal submittal letter from the Governor or his or her designee requesting EPA's approval of the revision. 1. The SIP package is submitted with a formal letter from TCEQ

Chairman Bryan W. Shaw to EPA Region 6. Y

2. Evidence is included that the State has adopted the revision in the State code or body of regulations, or that the State has issued the permit, order, consent agreement (hereafter document) in final form. This evidence would include effective date of revision, if di fferent from adoption/issuance date. 

### 2

. State Date of adoption or final issuance: April 3, 2012 (See April 13, 2012 issue of the Texas Register final rule )

. Y

3. Evidence is included that the State has necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the revision, e.g., a citation of the appropriate State authority. 3

. See the Order of Adopting Amended Rules and Revisions to the SIP by TCEQ Chairman Bryan W. Shaw for the State Docket

# 20 1 1

- 0845

- R UL dated April 3, 2012

. Y

4. A copy is included of the actual regulation or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the SIP including an indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official Stat e regulation document signed, stamped, and dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. 4

. Not an IBR, The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation document signed, stamped, and dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State, and the effective date of the rule is Final Rule effecti ve
date at the State Level: 

### April 19, 2012

. Y

5. Evidence is included that the State followed all the procedural requirements of its laws and/or its constitution in the conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. This evidence may be: a checklist of required steps; a copy of the requirements with each step clearly identified; or other appropriate documentation. 5 . The Docket # 20 11

- 0845

- R UL stamp

- dated April 3 , 201 2 indicates that TCEQ has followed all the procedural requirements. Y2 EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL Acceptable ?

Y N

6. Evidence is included that public notice was given of the proposed changes consistent with the procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice, (e.g., notarized or certified copies of any public notices published in newspaper s). (The notice should be at least 30 days prior to the public hearing(s). 6 . Copy of the statement of public notification, example of

classified ad as proof of publications of the notices

, statement in the order indicating invitation of public for hearing notices and intended action for submission of dat and view on the project is available. See the order signed by Bryan W. Shaw on April 3,

2012. Y

7. A certification is included indicating that public hearing(s) was/were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice(s) and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7 . See the section labeled as Notice and Proposal in the 2 01 2 SIP submittal (the “20 1 2 " here refers to the year that SIP submittal was received in the EPA R6 office and is stamp

- dated by the R6's Air Planning Section: April 30, 2012). Y

8. A compilation of public comments and the State's response is included 

### 8 . See the section labeled as Testimony in the 20 1 2 SIP submittal. [The rule project number 2011

- 018

- 117

- EN Repeal of Chapter 101 System Cap Trading Program Rules and Revisions to Chapter 117 , Date Adopted: March 28, 2012 Date Filed with the Secretary of State: March 30, 2012

Date Published in the Texas Register : April 13, 2012 Date Effective at State Level: April 19, 2012] Y3 Technical Materials

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL Acceptable

?

Y N

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the revision is

included. 1 . The pollutant of concern is NOx. Y

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s) is included. 2 . The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117

. Y

3. Quantification of the changes in SIP allowable emissions from the

affect ed sources is included. (Examples include estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources and/or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through

calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated if the revisions were approved.) 3

. The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, and is editorial in

nature. Y

4. Demonstration is included that the NAAQS/PSD increments/RFP demonstration and visibility as applicable, would be protected if the revision were approved and implemented. 4 . The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, and PSD, RFP, visibility are not applica ble here. Y

5. Is there a fully approved maintenance plan for the primary ambient air quality standards for at least 10 years as required by § 175A of the Clean

Air Act? 5 . The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, and maintenance plan per §175A of the Clean Air Act is not applicable here Y

6. Are contingency measures included? 6 . The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, and contingency measures do not apply here. Y

7. Modeling information required to support the propose revision, including input data, output data, models used, justification of model(s) selected, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the d etermination of adequacy of the modeling analysis as needed. 7 . The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, and modeling input, output, models used, data, ambient monitoring, justifications, and such information do not apply here. Y

8. Evidence is included where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology (e.g., add

- on controls, industrial/process equipment designs, reformulated materials, etc.). 8

. The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, the removal of

SCT is administrative in nature. No reformulated materials apply

here. Y4 EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL Acceptable

?

Y N

9. Evidence is included indicating that a SIP revision contains the following

to ensure stated emission levels: emission limitations, work practice standards, and recordkeeping/reporting requirements 9 . S ection s of interest are §§117.1020 , 117.1120 , 117.1220

, 117.3020 , 117.9800 and concerns editorial removal of reference

to SCT. Y

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies including how compliance will be determined in practice (including at what frequency). 10 . Compliance is determined based applicable provisions of

117.9800 and affects the DFW and HGB area utility sources. Y

11. Evidence is included as appropriate, special economic and technological justifications are included per applicable EPA policies or an explanation why such justifications are not necessary should be included. For example, the following types of request may require such justification: Alternative RACT, Long

- term averaging VOC emission limits, Plant wide Averaging. 11

. The revision is limited to editor ial removal of reference to SCT from specific sections for the DFW and HGB areas. Special technological just ifications are not applicable here

. Y5 

### SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST ( I n accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)

SIP Submitted by: TCEQ

Date Submitted: May 8, 2013 Subject: Regulation No. 117 Control of Air Pollution from Nitrogen Compounds

– Stationary Diesel Engine Petition (Halliburton) 

### Completeness Review Completed by: Alan Shar ; Date Completed: June 1 2 , 201 3

Administrative Materials

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL Acceptable?

Y N

1. The package is sent with a formal submittal letter from the Governor or his or her designee requesting EPA's approval of the revision. 1. The SIP package is submitted with a formal letter from TCEQ

Chairman Bryan W. Shaw to EPA Region 6. Y

2. Evidence is included that the State has adopted the revision in the State code or body of regulations, or that the State has issued the permit, order, consent agreement (hereafter document) in final form. This evidence would include effective date of revision, if different from adoption/issuance date. 

### 2. State Date of adoption or final issuance: April 10, 2013 (See April 26, 2013 issue of the Texas Register final rule )

. Final Rule effective date at the State Level: May 2, 2013

. Y

3. Evidence is included that the State has necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the revision, e.g., a citation of the appropriate State authority. 3

. See the Order of Adopting Amended Rules and Revisions to the SIP by TCEQ Chairman Bryan W. Shaw for the State Docket

# 20 12

- 1388

- R UL dated April 22, 2013. Y

4. A copy is included of the actual regulation or document submitted for

appr oval and incorporation by reference into the SIP including an indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation document signed, stamped, and dated by the appropri ate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. 4

. Not an IBR, The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation document signed, stamped, and dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State, and the effective date of the rule is Final Rule effecti ve
date at the State Level: 

### May 2, 2013

. Y

5. Evidence is included that the State followed all the procedural requirements of its laws and/or its constitution in the conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. This evidence may be:

a c hecklist of required steps; a copy of the requirements with each step clearly identified; or other appropriate documentation. 5. The Docket # 20 12

- 1388

- R UL stamp

- dated April 22, 2013,

indicates that TCEQ has followed all the procedural requirements. Y6 EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL Acceptable?

Y N

6. Evidence is included that public notice was given of the proposed changes consistent with the procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice, (e.g., notarized or certified copies of any public notices published in newspapers) . (The notice should be at least 30 days prior to the public hearing(s). 6. Copy of the example public notice, statement to the effect that public notification and a list of official and agencies that to

whom the correspondences abou t notice of public he arings has

been forwarded is included in a section labeled as “Notice & Proposal ” of the submittal . Also See the November 16, 2012 issue of Texas Register at 37 TexReg 9060. Y

7. A certification is included indicating that public hearing(s) was/were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice(s) and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. See the section labeled as Notice and Proposal in the 2 01 3 SIP submittal (the “20 1 3 " here refers to the year that SIP submitta l was received in the EPA R6 office and is stamp

- dated by the R6's Air Planning Section: May 13, 2013 ). Y

8. A compilation of public comments and the State's response is included 8. See the section labeled as Testimony in the 20 1 3 SIP submittal. [The rule project number 

### 2012

- 031

- 117

- AI

, Date Adopted: April 10, 2013, Date Filed with the Sec retary of
State: April 12, 2013, Date Published in the Texas Register : April 26, 2013, Date Effective at State Level: May 2, 2013 ]

. Y7 Technical Materials

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL Acceptable

?

Y N

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the revision is

included. 1. The pollutant of concern is NOx. Y

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s) is included. 2. The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, and affects low stationary diesel engines at a specific site in the DFW area. Y

3. Quantification of the changes in SIP allowable emissions from the affected sources is included. (Examples include estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources and/or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through

calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and

allowable emissions ant icipated if the revisions were approved.) 3. The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, and reportedly

has met the Tier 3 emission standards of 40 CFR Part 89. Y

4. Demonstration is included that the NAAQS/PSD increments/RFP demonstration and visibility as applicable would be protected if the revision were approved and implemented. 4. The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, and PSD, RFP, visibility are not appli cable here. Y

5. Is there a fully approved maintenance plan for the primary ambient air quality standards for at least 10 years as required by § 175A of the Clean

Air Act? 5. The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, and maintenance plan per §175A of the Clean Air Act is not applicable here Y

6. Are contingency measures included? 6. The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, and contingency measures do not apply here. Y

7. Modeling information required to support the propose revision, including input data, output data, models used, justification of model(s) selected, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the d etermination of adequacy of the modeling analysis as needed. 7. The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, and modeling input, output, models used, data, ambient monitoring, justifications, and such information do not apply here. Y

8. Evidence is included where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology (e.g., add

- on controls, industrial/process equipment designs, reformulated materials, etc.). 8

. The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117 . Source oper ates less than 1000 hours per year for training and product testing only. Meets the tier 3 40 CFR Part 89 standards, and annual

emission level is 0.87 tons per year. Reformulated materials do not apply here. Y8 EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL Acceptable

?

Y N 9. Evidence is included indicating that a SI P revision contains the following

to ensure stated emission levels: emission limitations, work practice standards, and recordkeeping/reporting requirements 9

. Section of interest is 117.2103 , 117.2130 , 117.2135 , 117.2145 and concerns exemptions and recordkeeping and reporting for this specific engine. These sections have been updated to reflect the revision accordingly. Y

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies including how co mpliance will be determined in practice (including at what frequency). 10. Compliance is determined based on section 117.2145 and source is required to maintain records for a minimum of five

years. Y

11. Evidence is included as appropriate, special economic and technological justifications are included per applicable EPA policies or an explanation why such justifications are not necessary should be included. For example, the following types of request may require such justification: Alternative RACT, Long

- term averaging VOC emission limits, Plant wide Averaging. 11. State has provided a section 110(l) analysis for 8

- hour ozone NAAQS purposes. Records of hours of operations are to be maintained for 5 y ears to demonstrate compliance with 117.2145(a). Y9 

### SIP Submitted by: TCEQ

Date Submitted: May 14, 2013 Subject: Regulation No. 117

– Control of Air Pollution from Nitrogen Compounds

– Definition of Emergency (ERCOT) 

### Completeness Review Completed by: Alan Shar; Date Completed: June 12, 2013

Administrative Materials

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL Acceptable?

Y N

1. The package is sent with a formal submittal letter from the Governor or his

or her designee requesting EPA's approval of the revision. 1. The SIP package is submitted with a formal letter from TCEQ

Chairman Bryan W. Shaw to EPA Region 6. Y

2. Evidence is included that the State has adopted the revision in the State code or body of regulations, or that the State has issued the permit, order, consent agreement (hereafter document) in final form. This evidence would include effective date of revision, if different from adoption/issuance date. 

### 2 . State Date of adoption or final issuanc e: April 10, 2013 (See April 26 , 201 3 2 issue of the Texas Register final rule). Y

3. Evidence is included that the State has necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the revision, e.g., a citation of the appropriate State authority. 3

. See the Order of Adopting Amended Rules and Revisions to the SIP by TCEQ Chairman Bryan W. Shaw for the State Docket

# 20 11

- 08 96

- R UL dated April 22 , 201 3

. Y

4. A copy is included of the actual regulation or document submitted for approval a nd incorporation by reference into the SIP including an indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation document signed, stamped, and dated by the appropriate St ate official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. 4

. Not an IBR, The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation document signed, stamped, and dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State, and the effective date of the rule is Final Rule effecti ve date at the State Level: May 2, 2013. Y

5. Evidence is included that the State followed all the procedural requirements of its laws and/or its constitution in the conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. This evidence may be:

a ch ecklist of required steps; a copy of the requirements with each step clearly identified; or other appropriate documentation. 5. The Docket # 20 11

- 08 96

- R UL stamp

- dated April 22 , 201 3 indicates that TCEQ has followed all the procedural requirements. Y

6. Evidence is included that public notice was given of the proposed changes consistent with the procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice, (e.g., notarized or certified copies of any public notices published in newspapers). (The notice should be at least 30 days prior to the public hearing(s). 6

. Copy of the example public notice, statement to the effect that public notification and a list of official and agencies that to whom the correspondences about notice of public hear ings has

been forwarded is included in a section labeled as “Notice & Proposal” of the submittal. Also See the November 2, 2012 issue of Texas Register at 37 TexReg 8722

. Y10 EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL Acceptable?

Y N

7. A certification is included indicating that public hearing(s) was/were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice(s) and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. See the section labeled as Notice and Proposal in the 2 01 3 SIP submittal (the “20 1 3 " here refers to the year that SIP submittal

was received in the EPA R6 office and is stamp

- dated by the R6's Air Planning Section: May 14, 2013 ). Y

8. A compilation of public comments and the State's response is included 

### 8. See the section labeled as Testimony in the 201 3 SIP submittal. [The rule project number 2012

- 025

- 117

- AI Chapter 117 Definition Update and Revisions to Chapter 101, Amendment to: §117.10 , Date Adopted: April 10, 2013, Date Filed with the Secretary of State: April 12, 2 013, Date Published

in the Texas Register : April 26, 2013, Date Effective: May 2, 2013] Y11 Technical Materials

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL Acceptable

?

Y N

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the revision is

included. 1. The pollutant of concern is NOx. Y

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s) is included. 2. The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117

. Y

3. Quantification of the changes in SIP allowable emissions from the affected sources is included. (Examples include estimates of changes in

current a ctual emissions from affected sources and/or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through

calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated if the revision s were approved.) 3. The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, and updates definition of the term “emergency” to ensure consistency with the

ERCOT’s definition of this term per Section 2 of its 

### Nodal

Protocols

. Y

4. Demonstration is included that the NAAQS/PSD increments/RFP demonstration and visibility as applicable, would be protected if the revision were approved and implemented. 4. The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, and PSD, RFP, visibility are not appl icable here. Y

5. Is there a fully approved maintenance plan for the primary ambient air quality standards for at least 10 years as required by § 175A of the Clean

Air Act? 5. The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, and maintenance plan per §175A of the Clean Air Act is not applicable here Y

6. Are contingency measures included? 6. The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, and contingency measures do not apply here. Y

7. Modeling information required to support the propose revision, including input data, output data, models used, justification of model(s) selected, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the d etermination of adequacy of the modeling analysis as needed. 7. The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, and modeling input, output, models used, data, ambient monitoring, justifications, and such information do not apply here. Y

8. Evidence is include d where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology (e.g., add

- on controls, industrial/process equipment designs, reformulated materials, etc.). 8

. The submittal concerns 30 TAC Chapter 117, and updates definition of the term “emergency” in 117.10(15) to ensure consistency with the ERCOT’s definition and application of this

term. Y12 EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL Acceptable

?

Y N 9. Evidence is included indicating that a SIP revision contains the following

to ensure stated emission levels: emission li mitations, work practice standards, and recordkeeping/reporting requirements 9 . Section of interest is §117.10 (15) and concerns updating this

definition. Y

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies including how compliance will be determined in practice (including at what frequency). 10. Compliance is determined based on 

### ERCOT

- declared

emergency time period. Y

11. Evidence is included as appropriate, special economic and technological justifications are included per applicable EPA policies or an explanation why such justifications are not necessary should be included. For example, the following types of request may require such justification: Alternative RACT, Long

- term averaging VOC emission limits, Plant wide Averaging. 11. The revision is limited to updating a definition to promote energy reliability service during emergency declared periods. Special technological justifications are not applicable here

. Y