alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2504 

To provide for continuing cooperation between the National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration and the Israel Space Agency, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2018 

Mr. PETERS (for himself, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. NELSON, and Mr. GARDNER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To provide for continuing cooperation between the National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Israel 

Space Agency, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States and 

5 Israel Space Cooperation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds that— 

8 (1) authorized in 1958, the National Aero9 nautics and Space Administration (NASA) supports 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2504 IS

1 and coordinates United States Government research 

2 in aeronautics, human exploration and operations, 

3 science, and space technology; 

4 (2) established in 1983, the Israel Space Agen5 cy (ISA) supports the growth of Israel’s space indus6 try by supporting academic research, technological 

7 innovation, and educational activities; 

8 (3) the mutual interest of the United States 

9 and Israel in space exploration affords both nations 

10 an opportunity to leverage their unique abilities to 

11 advance scientific discovery; 

12 (4) in 1996, NASA and the ISA entered into 

13 their first agreement outlining areas of mutual co14 operation, which remained in force until 2005; 

15 (5) since 1996, NASA and the ISA have suc16 cessfully cooperated on many space programs sup17 porting the Global Positioning System and research 

18 related to the sun, earth science, and the environ19 ment; 

20 (6) the bond between NASA and the ISA was 

21 permanently forged on February 1, 2003, with the 

22 loss of the crew of STS–107 including Israeli Astro23 naut Ilan Ramon; 

24 (7) the United States-Israel Strategic Partner25 ship Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–296) designated 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2504 IS

1 Israel as a Major Strategic Partner of the United 

2 States; and 

3 (8) on October 13, 2015, the United States and 

4 Israel signed the Framework Agreement between the 

5 National Aeronautics and Space Administration of 

6 the United States of America and the Israel Space 

7 Agency for Cooperation in Aeronautics and the Ex8 ploration and Use of Airspace and Outer Space for 

9 Peaceful Purposes. 

10 SEC. 3. CONTINUING COOPERATION. 

11 The Administrator of the National Aeronautics and 

12 Space Administration shall continue to work with the 

13 Israel Space Agency to identify and cooperatively pursue 

14 peaceful space exploration and science initiatives in areas 

15 of mutual interest, taking all appropriate measures to pro16 tect sensitive information, intellectual property, trade se17 crets, and economic interests of the United States. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGAN HOLDING CORP.

FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I am the Chief Executive Officer of Regan Holding Corp., a California corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 ("Form 10-K").



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: March 31, 2008

By: /s/ Lynda L. Pitts

Lynda L. Pitts

Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Regan Holding Corp. and will be retained by Regan Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 72-6112.

#### Conklin *v.*Britton, Warden.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             313
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,892
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,799
<PP&E>                                           7,625
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,144
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        328
<COMMON>                                           121
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,920)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,378
<SALES>                                         52,635
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,635
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 852
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,447)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,597)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,597)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)


</TABLE>
#### TEMPLE TRUST COMPANY, Appellant, v. W. H. SEWELL et ux., Appellees.

No. 7797.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

April 13, 1932.

Jno. B. Daniel, of Temple, and Critz & Woodward, of Coleman, for appellant.

Dibrell & Starnes, of Coleman, for appel-lees.

BBAIR, J.

This appeal is from an order overruling appellant’s motion to dissolve a temporary injunction. The appeal presents the same character of proceedings and the same questions of law as were this day determined by this court in Temple Trust Company v. Powers, 50 S.W.(2d) 362. The cases were presented as one case on oral argument, and, upon authority of the decision in the Powers Case, the order appealed from herein will be set aside, and the temporary injunction will be dissolved.

Order appealed from set aside; temporary injunction dissolved.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D2022-1812 

LT Case No. 2020-CA-0499

_____________________________

FIKRETA SELIMANOVIC and 

IBRAHIM SELIMANOVIC, 

Appellants, 

v.

JEFFREY BRYANT ANTHONY and 

JEFFREY HAMILTON ANTHONY, 

Appellees. 

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County. 

Lauren P. Blocker, Judge. 

Andrew B. Greenlee, of Andrew B. Greenlee, P.A., Sanford, for 

Appellants. 

Kansas Gooden, of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Miami, and Lara J. 

Edelstein, Boca Raton, for Appellees. 

June 25, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

EDWARDS, C.J., and WALLIS and SOUD, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2310 

To require the United States Trade Representative to permit the public 

to submit comments on trade agreement negotiations through the Internet. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2018 

Mr. TESTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require the United States Trade Representative to permit 

the public to submit comments on trade agreement negotiations through the Internet. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Trade Transparency 

5 and Public Input Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON TRADE NEGOTIATIONS. 

7 Section 105(a)(1) of the Bipartisan Congressional 

8 Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 (19 

9 U.S.C. 4204(a)(1)) is amended— 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2310 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

2 and inserting a semicolon; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period 

4 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(E) at least 30 calendar days before initi7 ating negotiations with a country, publish on a 

8 publicly available Internet website of the Office 

9 of the United States Trade Representative an 

10 easily accessible portal— 

11 ‘‘(i) that allows the public to electroni12 cally submit comments on the negotiations 

13 for the duration of the negotiations; and 

14 ‘‘(ii) which shall be in addition to re15 quests for comments issued by the United 

16 States Trade Representative through no17 tice in the Federal Register.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          13,968
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,234
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,170
<PP&E>                                         196,194
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 297,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,719
<BONDS>                                        203,590
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     37,096
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,808
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   297,263
<SALES>                                        138,702
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               139,977
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,109
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,548
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,513
<INCOME-TAX>                                       881
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,632
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 24.06**

**AMBAC FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.**

**Power of Attorney**

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned director of Ambac Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby constitutes and appoints eachof **Sean T. Leonard**and**Anne Gill Kelly,** as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the **Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2008**, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange, and any and all amendments thereto, and any and all instruments and documents filed as a part of or in connectionwith the said **Form 10-K** or amendments thereto, and does hereby grant unto each said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about thepremises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each said attorney-in-fact and agent shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has subscribed these presents as of this 25th day of February 2009. 

/s/    Thomas C. Theobald                

Thomas C. Theobald
Form DGO-GO-15
Rev. 6/09 Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy
Division of Gas and Oil P.O. Box 159, 135 Highlands Drive Lebanon, VA 24266 (276) 415-9700

Permit Number:

COMPLETION REPORT

Well type: Oil Gas Coalbed Methane Injection Well

Date Well Completed: Total Depth:

Attach the Drilling Report if not previously submitted. In addition, submit any changes in casing or tubing that were approved after the Drilling Report was submitted.

STIMULATION RECORD (Use additional sheets with this format, if more than three zones are stimulated.)

ZONE 1: Formation Stimulated With: Perforated to No. of Perforations Perforation Size Formation Broke down at: PSIG Average Injection Rate: (PSIG) ISIP (PSIG) MIN SIP. (PSIG) Average Downhole Injection Pressure (PSIG) Stimulated: Yes No Date Stimulated:

ZONE 2: Formation Stimulated With: Perforated to No. of Perforations Perforation Size Formation Broke down at: PSIG Average Injection Rate: (PSIG) ISIP (PSIG) MIN SIP. (PSIG) Average Downhole Injection Pressure (PSIG) Stimulated: Yes No Date Stimulated:

ZONE 3: Formation Stimulated With: Perforated to No. of Perforations Perforation Size Formation Broke down at: PSIG Average Injection Rate: (PSIG) ISIP (PSIG) MIN SIP. (PSIG) Average Downhole Injection Pressure (PSIG) Stimulated: Yes No Date Stimulated:

FINAL RODUCTION: Natural After Stimulation

BOD MCFD HOURS
TESTED ROCK
PRESSURE HOURS
TESTED ZONE (1) ZONE (2) ZONE (3)

Final production if gas zones are commingled MCFD Hours Tested

PS16 Hours Tested

Permittee: (Company) By: (Signature) Date:
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-30182

Summary Calendar

MAUREEN GREENE,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SMILE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY; GERALDINE RUSSELL; ST.

MARTIN IBERIA LAFAYETTE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY; ALVIN

WILTZ; ANTHONY WILTZ; ROSALIE SPENCER,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 6:08-MC-43

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Maureen Greene appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to stay.

Greene filed the motion seeking permission from the district court to file suit

despite the fact that she has been banned from filing any further pleadings in

the district court absent authorization from a judge. Greene was originally

banned because she continued to file meritless law suits on similar facts.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 6, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 09-30182

2

Over the last twelve years, Greene has brought a variety of civil rights

claims against numerous employers – though none has survived to trial on the

merits. Indeed, Greene has filed at least ten such suits in federal court and four

in state court. The district court said that Greene has “abused judicial process,

wasted limited judicial resources and has cost the numerous parties she has

sued thousands of dollars in unnecessary attorneys’ fees.” Likewise, Greene’s

current appeal has no basis in law or fact.

This is not the first time Greene has appeared before this court. At the

conclusion of one of her suits in 2006, we warned Greene that we are authorized

to impose penalties for vexatious and frivolous appeals. Greene v. Fontenot, 221

F. App’x. 343, 344 (5th Cir. 2007) (per curiam); see also Coghlan v. Starkey, 852

F.2d 806, 808 (5th Cir. 1988) (noting that the courts of appeal have authority to

compel sanctions sua sponte, even where not requested by an adverse party or

imposed by the district court). At that time, we chose not to impose a monetary

penalty even though it was likely warranted. Given Greene’s continued misuse

of the courts, we decide that such action is necessary. Even pro se litigants do

not have “unrestrained license to pursue totally frivolous appeals.” Clark v.

Green, 814 F.2d 221, 223 (5th Cir. 1987). 

Accordingly, Greene’s appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous and she is

ORDERED to PAY a sanction in the amount of $105 to the clerk of this court.

The clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts within this

Circuit are DIRECTED to refuse to file any pro se civil complaint or appeal by

Greene unless she submits proof of satisfaction of this penalty. Greene should

review any pending appeals to ensure that they are not frivolous. See Lovell v.

Greer, 250 F.3d 740, *1 (5th Cir. 2001) (unpublished).
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Boardof Directors 

Ambac Financial Group, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-152479, 333-110145 and 333-52449) of our reports dated April 9, 2010, with respect to the consolidatedbalance sheets of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (“Ambac” or the “Company”) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows foreach of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and all related financial statement schedules, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in theDecember 31, 2009 Form 10-K of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph that states that, significant deterioration of the guaranteed portfolio coupled with the inability to write new financial guarantees hasadversely impacted the business, results of operations and financial condition of the Company’s operating subsidiary, Ambac Assurance Corporation. Ambac Assurance Corporation is subject to significant regulatory oversight by the Office of theCommissioner of Insurance of the State of Wisconsin, including the recent establishment and rehabilitation of a segregated account of Ambac Assurance Corporation. Additionally, the Company has limited liquidity. Such factors raise substantial doubtabout the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Our report also refers tothe change in the method of evaluating other-than-temporary impairments on securities due to the adoption of new accounting requirements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) as of April 1, 2009 and the change inthe method of accounting for financial guarantee contracts due to the adoption of new accounting requirements issued by the FASB as of January 1, 2009. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

New York, New York 

April 9, 2010
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                                                    ------------
                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

I, Edward F. Cooke, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Levcor International,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2006

/s/ EDWARD F. COOKE
-------------------
Edward F. Cooke,
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer

================================================================================
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCUS VALENTINE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 236 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCUS VALENTINE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 237 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.