alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      10.2

    August
      29, 2008

    


    


    C.
      Thomas
      Richardson

    [Home
      address redacted]

    


    


    Dear
      Tom:

    


    Reference
      is made to (i) the Consulting Agreement dated January 4, 2008 between you and
      NYFIX, Inc. and (ii) the Employment Agreement dated January 4, 2008 between
      you
      and NYFIX, Inc. (collectively, the “Agreements”).

    


    For
      good
      and valuable consideration, you and NYFIX, Inc. hereby agree that each reference
      in the Agreements to “March 1, 2008” shall be and hereby is amended to be
“September 2, 2008,” other than with respect to the following provision of the
      Employment Agreement:

    


    “You
      will
      be eligible to receive four (4) weeks of vacation each calendar year,


    which
      will be pro rated for 2008 for the period of time employed unless your


    Employment
      Commencement Date is on or before March 1, 2008.”

    


    Please
      be
      advised that your vacation time for 2008 will be pro rated based on your initial
      date of employment.

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	Very
              truly
              yours
	 	 
	 	NYFIX, INC.
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	 	By:  	/s/ P.
              Howard
              Edelstein
	 	
              
Name: P.
              Howard Edelstein
	 	Title:  
Chief
              Executive Officer



     

    Agreed:

    


    


    
      	/s/
              C. Thomas Richardson	 	 	 
	C. Thomas Richardson	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Date: August 29, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Travis Boats & Motors,
Inc. (the  "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark T.
Walton,  President of the Company,  certify,  to my best  knowledge  and belief,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:  (1) The  Report  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C.  78m(a) or 78o(d));  and (2) The information  contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

/s/ Mark T. Walton
Mark T. Walton, President
Signed January 20, 2005, effective as of February 17, 2004
1

King, Melanie

From: Higgins, Cortney <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:02 AM

To: King, Melanie

Cc: Elman, Barry; Wayland, Robertj; Schreifels, Jeremy

Subject: RE: EO 12866 review of RIN 2060-AR33 Carbon Pollution Guidelines for EGUs in Indian 

Country and Territories - draft TSD

HI Melanie,

Below are some interagency comments on the TSD:

Pg. 2, Data section: only seems to discuss the data required for the calculation of building block 4...the RIA 

provided a much better overview of this. Suggest adding text regarding the first three building blocks. 

Pg. 2, Data section: “DOE’s Office of Indian Energy” should be written out as “DOE’s Office of Indian Energy 

Policy and Programs” 

Throughout, should use consistent bullets or numbers in the “data required” or “data sources” lists (ex. See 

pages 2, 7, 9, 10). 

Regards,

Cortney

From: King, Melanie [mailto:King.Melanie@epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 2:26 PM 

To: Higgins, Cortney 

Cc: Elman, Barry; Wayland, Robertj; Schreifels, Jeremy 

Subject: EO 12866 review of RIN 2060-AR33 Carbon Pollution Guidelines for EGUs in Indian Country and Territories - 

draft TSD 

Hi Cortney,

The draft TSD for the supplemental proposal is attached.  We're still working to provide a little more detail on

how the goals change with the application of each building block (similar to Appendix 5 in the June proposal's

Goal Computation TSD) and should have an updated version early next week.

Melanie King 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-2469 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

king.melanie@epa.gov
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ray C. Davis, Co-Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: January 9, 2006



/s/    RAY C. DAVISRay C. DavisCo-Chief Executive Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kelcy L. Warren, Co-Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: January 9, 2006



/s/    KELCY L. WARRENKelcy L. WarrenCo-Chief Executive Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RAYMOND FAULK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4834

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 22, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Clay County.

John H. Skinner, Judge.

Raymond Faulk, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., WOLF and ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Communications Group, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, E.Y. Snowden, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Karen A. Walker, Vice President, Finance and Administration and
Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                            |  | 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------ |  | 
|Date: August 9, 2004 |  | /s/ E.Y. Snowden                          
|                     |  | E.Y. Snowden                              
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer     
|                     | 
|Date: August 9, 2004 |  | /s/ Karen A. Walker                       
|                     |  | Karen A. Walker                           
|                     |  | Vice President, Finance and Administration
|                     |  | and Chief Financial Officer               



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Boston Communications Group, Inc., and will be retained by Boston Communications Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

MAY 12 ZUIO 

The Honorable Lynn A. Westmoreland 

House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Congressman Wesbnoreland: 

Office of the Adrrinistrator 

S J 11- J Oil J :,,-1111< 

800 Independonce Ave., s.w. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Secretary LaHood has asked me to respond to your letter, cosigned by your congressional 

colleagues, about the Federal Aviation Administration's new crewmember flight, duty, and rest 

rules. 

In June 2009, we chartered a new flight, duty, and rest Aviation Rulemaldng Committee (ARC) 

comprising representatives from the FAA, industry, and labor organizatiQns to address these 

issues. The ARC was tasked with making recommendations for a science·based approach to 

fatigue management. In the ARC's charter, we recogniwl that the effects of fatigue are 

universal so the strategies needed to mitigate these effects are the same, regardless of the type of 

flight operation. We received the ARC's reconunendations in September 2009, and we are 

preparing a new notice of proposed rulema1dng (NPRM). 

The NPRM will invite interested persons to participate by submitting written comments to the 

public rulernaking docket during the comment period. Your letter, which expresses concerns 

about the potential effects of proposed changes to the flight, duty, and rest rules, will become a 

part of the docket We will review all input from the process and make a final determination for 

the new guidelines. 

You were also concerned about how these proposed changes will effect humanitarian and military 

transportation. Current regulations address these issues and are not the subject of this rulemaking. 

We have sent an identical letter to each oftbe cosigners of your letter. 

If! can be of further assistance, please contact me or Roderick D. Han, Assistant Administrator 

for Government and Industry Affairs, at (202) 267-3277. 

Sincerely. 

\~t\;",,> 

,--,,-,," __ dolph Babbitt 

Administrator
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; PAR Panel: Innovative Research in Cancer Nanotechnology.                    

*Date:*                         October 10-11, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         AC Hotel Bethesda, 4646 Montgomery Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Raj K Krishnaraju, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6190, MSC 7804, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1047,                         *kkrishna@csr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 9, 2024.

Lauren A. Fleck,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-20788 Filed 9-12-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**EXHIBIT 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Jones Apparel Group, Inc. Bristol, Pennsylvania

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 filed on May 15, 1996, June 16, 1999, August 23, 1999,August 2, 2001, June 12, 2003, June 2, 2004 and June 3, 2005 of Jones ApparelGroup, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our reports dated February 20, 2007, relating tothe consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, and theeffectiveness of Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries' internal controlover financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP New York, New YorkFebruary 20, 2007
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-30628

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WARREN J. BROUSSARD, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. CR-94-20018

- - - - - - - - - -

September 20, 1996

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Warren J. Broussard, Jr., appeals his conviction and

sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base

pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841. Broussard argues that the district

court erred in denying the downward adjustment for acceptance of

responsibility because he gave a signed confession and did not

contest the presence or amount of narcotics, and the only issue
No. 95-30628

- 2 -

at trial was whether he could be held accountable for the mental

state of the crime rather than his participation. He contends

that application note 2 to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 applies. Broussard

denied his guilt and put the Government to its burden of proof on

an element of the crime, intent to distribute. The district

court did not clearly err in denying the adjustment. United

States v. Cartwright, 6 F.3d 294, 304 (5th Cir. 1993), cert.

denied, 115 S. Ct. 671 (1994).

Broussard argues that, based on expert testimony, cocaine

base and powder cocaine are scientifically the same substance,

that the disparity in the guidelines ranges for the two drugs is

unfounded, and that the lesser guideline range for powder cocaine

should apply according to the rule of lenity and the Equal

Protection Clause. This court rejected this identical argument

in United States v. Flanagan, 87 F.3d 121, 123-24 (5th Cir.

1996); see also United States v. Cherry, 50 F.3d 338, 342-44 (5th

Cir. 1995)(rejecting equal protection argument).

Broussard’s statement is sufficient evidence from which to

infer his intent to distribute the cocaine. The record is not

devoid of evidence of his intent to distribute. United States v.

Laury, 49 F.3d 145, 151 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 162

(1995); United States v. Pierre, 958 F.2d 1304, 1310 (5th Cir.)

(en banc).

Broussard’s speedy trial argument is abandoned for failure

to brief it. Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.

1993). Likewise, Broussard has failed to brief and has thus

abandoned his argument that his later consent to search the van
No. 95-30628

- 3 -

was tainted by the alleged prior illegal arrest, rendering the

arrest issue moot.

AFFIRMED.
[No. 35092.

Department Two.

November 9, 1960.]

#### Alma M. Spezia, *Appellant,*v. William L. Spezia, *Respondent.**1*

T. *Patrick Corbett,*for appellant.

*Wayne C. Booth*and *Wright, Booth & Beresford,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 356 P. (2d) 588.

Per Curiam.

A wife brought an action for divorce. The husband cross-complained, asking for a divorce. The wife dismissed her action, and the case went to trial on the husband’s cross-complaint. He was awarded a divorce; she was awarded the custody of their child, then twelve years of age. The community property was distributed.

*282The wife appeals, raising only one issue, ie., whether the finding of fact on which the divorce is predicated reveals any recognized form of cruel treatment or personal indignities rendering life burdensome within the meaning of RCW 26.08.020(5).

It must be conceded that a much stronger finding of fact could have been made from the testimony, if believed by the trial court. However, taking the finding as it stands (read in the light of the wife’s own testimony and of her affidavit in support of her motion for a new trial), we have a wife who belittles her husband in the presence of their child and pictures him to the child as a “mean man,” and who has to “some extent” alienated the child from his father. She regards her husband as not “mature,” and, hence, she insists that he conform to her wishes and desires. If he does not so conform, she refuses to discuss matters with him, and takes her marital problems to her mother. Her attitudes must belittle the father in the eyes of his son. Her contention, that these things do not constitute mental cruelty, but serves to make more apparent the plane of superiority on which she lives and moves and has her being.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Exhibit 10.8


 


AMENDMENT OF
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS IS AN AMENDMENT OF EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), dated as of October 13, 2004,
by and between B&G FOODS, INC. (hereinafter “Corporation”), and James Brown
(hereinafter “Brown”), amending the Employment Agreement by and between the
Corporation and Brown (the “Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS, the
Corporation and Brown previously entered into the Agreement, to be effective as
of the Offering (as defined below), if the Offering closed prior to June 30,
2004; and


 


WHEREAS, the Offering did not close prior to June 30 2004 and
will instead close on October 14, 2004; and


 


WHEREAS, Brown and
the Corporation desire to amend Section 1 of the Agreement to provide that the
Agreement shall be effective as of October 14, 2004.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the material advantages accruing to the two parties and the
mutual covenants contained herein and in the Agreement, the Corporation and
Brown agree with each other as follows:


 


1.             Section 1 of the
Agreement as it currently reads is no longer effective and is void ab initio.


 


2.             Section 1 of the
Agreement is hereby replaced with the following provision:


 


“1.           EFFECTIVE DATE. 
For purposes of this Agreement, the ‘Effective Date’ shall mean October
14, 2004, the date of the closing of the Corporation’s initial public offering
of the ‘Enhanced Income Securities’ as described in the final prospectus to be
filed with the Securities Exchange Commission by the Corporation (the
‘Offering’).”


 






















 


3.             This Amendment may be
executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and
all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


IN  WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Corporation and Brown have executed this Amendment as of the day
and year first above written.


 


 


	
   

  	
  B&G FOODS, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Robert C. Cantwell

  
	
   

  	
  Name: Robert C.
  Cantwell

  
	
   

  	
  Title: Executive Vice
  President of Finance

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ James Brown

  
	
   

  	
  James Brown

  



 


2