alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice:12526]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in the exhibition “Wifredo Lam” at The Museum of Modern Art, New York, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2024-20383 Filed 9-9-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7640

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES FELTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (CR-93-88; CA-04-737)

Submitted: March 29, 2006 Decided: April 19, 2006

Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Felton, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James Felton seeks to appeal the district court's order

denying relief on his “Motion for Permission to File a First § 2255

motion.” The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Felton has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,1998 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       9,726,123
<SECURITIES>                                 3,878,005
<RECEIVABLES>                                  678,365
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,400
<INVENTORY>                                    277,209
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,723,900
<PP&E>                                         742,931
<DEPRECIATION>                               (274,820)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,987,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          893,295
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,209
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,012,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,987,630
<SALES>                                        303,895
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               433,270
<CGS>                                          190,323
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  233,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,087,621
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,879,178)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,879,178)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 11.1 COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME  PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended
                                                      September 30,          September 30,
                                                   --------------------  ---------------------- 
                                                     1998       1997       1998        1997    
                                                   ---------  ---------  ---------  -----------
<S>                                                <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Basic:
 Net income  attributable to common shares.......    $ 5,821    $ 1,201    $14,279      $    79
                                                   =========  =========  =========  ===========
 Weighted average common shares outstanding......     21,946     19,087     21,876       18,989
                                                   =========  =========  =========  ===========
 Per share amount................................    $  0.27    $  0.06    $  0.65      $  0.00
                                                   =========  =========  =========  ===========

Diluted:
 Net income......................................    $ 5,821    $ 1,201    $14,279      $    79
 Net effect of convertible debentures based on the
  if-converted method, assuming 100% conversion:
   $35,000,000, 6.75%, due 2006..................        630        630      1,890        1,890
   $50,000,000, 7.0%, due 2004...................        947        947      2,841        1,473
   $143,750,000, 5.25%, due 2002.................      2,089         --      6,267           --
                                                   ---------  ---------  ---------  -----------
 Net income attributable to common shares........    $ 9,487    $ 2,778    $25,277      $ 3,442
                                                   =========  =========  =========  ===========

 Weighted average common shares outstanding......     21,946     19,087     21,876       18,989

 Net effect of convertible debentures based on the
  if-converted method, assuming 100% conversion:
   $35,000,000, 6.75%, due 2006..................      1,710      1,717      1,714        1,717
   $50,000,000, 7.0%, due 2004...................      2,469      2,469      2,469        1,280
   $143,750,000, 5.25%, due 2002.................      5,000         --      5,000           --

Net effect of dilutive stock options based on the
 treasury stock method, using average market
  price..........................................        463        380        510          380
                                                   ---------  ---------  ---------  -----------
   Totals........................................     31,588     23,653     31,569       22,366
                                                   =========  =========  =========  ===========
 Per share amount................................    $  0.30    $  0.12    $  0.80        $0.15
                                                   =========  =========  =========  ===========
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 30, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20283 Summary Calendar

CIPRIANO YANEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division

USDC No. 4:04-CV-4604

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Cipriano Yanez (“Yanez”) filed a claim under the Social Security Act for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). An Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denied Yanez’s claim and the Appeals Council affirmed the decision of the ALJ. Treating the decision of the Appeals Council as the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, Yanez filed suit in the district court for the Southern District of Texas seeking judicial reviewof the Commissioner’s decision. Yanez and the Commissioner filed

cross motions for summary judgment, and the matter was referred to a Magistrate Judge for report and recommendation. The Magistrate Judge recommended that Yanez’s motion for summary judgment be denied, and the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment be granted. The district court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation and entered final judgment dismissing Yanez’s action. Yanez appeals to this Court. Our review is limited to determining (1) whether there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to support the Commissioner’s decision, and (2) whether the Commissioner’s decision comports with relevant legal standards. Jones v. Apfel , 174 F.3d 692, 693 (5th Cir. 1999). We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts, and relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation, as adopted by the district court, we affirm the decision of the district court to enter final judgment against Yanez.
AFFIRMED.
#### Busch, Appellee, *v.*Wagner, Supt., et al., Appellants.

(No. 28643

Decided June 11, 1941.)

*416
      *Messrs. Jacobson é Durst,*for appellee.

*Mr. Mason Douglass,*for appellants.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.

Matthias, J., not participating.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8447

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(4:05-cr-01044-RBH-l) 

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 24, 2009 

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Raymond Edward Chestnut, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard 

Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Raymond Edward Chesnut appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chesnut, 

No. 4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2008). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1470 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the deduction 

for the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals be allowed 

in determining self-employment tax. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2009 

Mr. KIND (for himself, Mr. HERGER, Ms. KOSMAS, and Mr. REICHERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that the deduction for the health insurance costs of selfemployed individuals be allowed in determining self-employment tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equity for Our Na5 tion’s Self-Employed Act of 2009’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1470 IH

1 SEC. 2. SECA TAX DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE 

2 COSTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (l) of section 162 of 

4 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special 

5 rules for health insurance costs of self-employed individ6 uals) is amended by striking paragraph (4) and by redes7 ignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (4). 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

10 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED AS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                             397
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,081
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,250
<PP&E>                                          11,445
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,423
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,972
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        328
<COMMON>                                            91
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,630
<SALES>                                         33,445
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,445
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,578
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,118)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        58
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,176)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,176)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)


</TABLE>
VI 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2411 

For the relief of Miguel Angel Perez-Montes, Jr. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2018 

Ms. DUCKWORTH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Miguel Angel Perez-Montes, Jr. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MIGUEL 

4 ANGEL PEREZ-MONTES, JR. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), on filing an application for issuance 

8 of an immigrant visa under section 204 of that Act (8 

9 U.S.C. 1154) or for adjustment of status to lawful perma10 nent resident, Miguel Angel Perez-Montes, Jr., shall be 

11 eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:06 Feb 09, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2411.IS S2411

SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2411 IS

1 ment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 

2 permanent residence. 

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Miguel Angel 

4 Perez-Montes, Jr., enters the United States before the 

5 date of the filing deadline described in subsection (c), the 

6 alien shall be— 

7 (1) considered to have entered and remained 

8 lawfully in the United States; and 

9 (2) eligible for adjustment of status under sec10 tion 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

11 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of enactment of this 

12 Act, if the alien is otherwise eligible for adjustment 

13 of status under that section. 

14 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

15 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap16 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica17 tion for adjustment of status is filed, together with the 

18 applicable fees, not later than 2 years after the date of 

19 enactment of this Act. 

20 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—On 

21 the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent residence 

22 to Miguel Angel Perez-Montes, Jr., the Secretary of State 

23 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 

24 current or next following fiscal year— 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2411 IS

1 (1) the total number of immigrant visas that 

2 are made available to natives of the country of birth 

3 of the alien under section 203(a) of the Immigration 

4 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)); or 

5 (2) if applicable, the total number of immigrant 

6 visas that are made available to natives of the coun7 try of birth of the alien under section 202(e) of that 

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Medivation, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 14, 2006



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|                                            
|/s/ David T. Hung, M.D.                     
|Name: David T. Hung, M.D.                   
|Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.