alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          41,447
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  106,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,116,051
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,439,788
<PP&E>                                         289,454
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (72,772)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,314,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,281,414
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,717
<OTHER-SE>                                     866,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,314,992
<SALES>                                        108,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,964
<CGS>                                           93,202
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,086,181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,019
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,120,438)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,120,438)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,120,438)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.37)
        

</TABLE>
#### CITY OF SAN ANTONIO et al. v. BROWN et al.

No. 8891.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio,

May 18, 1932.

T. D. Cobbs, Jr., W. C. Davis, and Jack Davis, all of San Antonio, for plaintiffs in error.

T. H. Ridgeway, of San Antonio, for defendants in error.

SMITH, J.

It appears that the question presented in the appeal is moot.

Ordinarily, in such case it would be sufficient to dismiss the appeal. To do so in this case, however, would leave the judgment appealed from intact, so that it could be pleaded in future as res adjudicata of the right, authority, and power of the city of San Antonio to legislate by ordinance relative to the use and occupation of public places such as that here involved, to the prejudice of one or both parties.

In such cases the better practice seems to be to dismiss the cause from the court below as well as this court. McWhorter v. Northcut, 94 Tex. 86, 58 S. W. 720; Anderson .v. City of San Antonio (Tex. Civ. App.) 26 S.W. (2d) 353.

Accordingly, the cause will be dismissed, the costs of appeal to be taxed equally against plaintiffs in errorr and defendants in error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMEDICS
DETECTION INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 2,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                                 10,052
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          16,459
<ALLOWANCES>                                            1,684
<INVENTORY>                                            13,128
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       74,578
<PP&E>                                                 12,784
<DEPRECIATION>                                          8,221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        133,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  12,411
<BONDS>                                                   103
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                1,932
<OTHER-SE>                                            118,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          133,021
<SALES>                                                45,740
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       56,157
<CGS>                                                  21,507
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          27,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        6,355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          613
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         4,523
<INCOME-TAX>                                            1,195
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     3,328
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                            3,328
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.17


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         972,619
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               60,611,894
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                   1,097,923,524
<DEPRECIATION>                              26,815,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,148,077,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       243,158
<OTHER-SE>                                 530,371,581
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,148,077,920
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            32,777,527
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,140,734
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,344,568
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,094,769
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,094,769
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,094,769
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,831,683
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,379,352
<ALLOWANCES>                                   250,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,128,905
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,427,174
<PP&E>                                       2,699,235
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,500,105
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,530,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,137,479
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          277,923
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,362,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,530,307
<SALES>                                     21,447,341
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,447,341
<CGS>                                        9,371,342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,371,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,980,905
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,621,770
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,621,770
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,621,770
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
        

</TABLE>
Search Help More Search Options 

Printable Version 

Packaged Terminal Air 

Conditioners and Heat 

Pumps Energy 

Conservation Standard 

Final Rule 

The Energy Policy and 

Conservation Act (EPCA), as 

amended, provides the Department 

of Energy (DOE) the authority to 

establish energy conservation 

standards for certain commercial 

equipment covered by the 

American Society of Heating, 

Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning 

Engineers (ASHRAE) and the 

Illuminating Engineering Society of 

North America (IESNA) Standard 

90.1, including packaged terminal 

air conditioners (PTACs) and 

packaged terminal heat pumps 

(PTHPs). (42 U.S.C. 6313(a)(6)

(A)) Section 342(a)(6)(A) provides 

that DOE may prescribe a standard 

more stringent than the level in 

ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1, 

after ASHRAE amends the energy 

conservation standards found in 

ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1, if 

DOE can demonstrate "by clear 

and convincing evidence," that 

such a more stringent standard 

"would result in significant 

additional conservation of energy 

and is technologically feasible and 

economically justified." (42 U.S.C. 

6313(a)(6)(A)(II) 

Final Rule 

The U.S. Department of Energy 

issued a Final Rule on October 7, 

2008, which amends the existing 

energy conservation standards for 

standard size and non-standard 

size packaged terminal air 

conditioners and packaged terminal 

heat pumps. This regulation is 

effective November 6, 2008. The 

EERE Information Center 

file://C:\DOCUME~1\mposton\LOCALS~1\Temp\1SV6YYKE.htm 12/1/2008
Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov 

Content Last Updated: 10/14/2008 

amended energy conservation 

standards established in the final 

rule will be applicable starting 

October 8, 2012 for standard size 

PTACs and PTHPs. The standards 

established in the final rule will be 

applicable starting October 7, 2010 

for non-standard size PTACs and 

PTHPs. 

The following documents are 

available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. 

Download Adobe Reader. 

z Energy Conservation 

Program for Commercial and 

Industrial Equipment: Final 

Rule for Packaged Terminal 

Air Conditioner and Packaged 

Terminal Heat Pump Energy 

Conservation Standards, 

October 7, 2008. (PDF 685 

KB) 

z Final Rule Technical Support 

Document 

z Final Rule Analytical Tools

Printable Version 

file://C:\DOCUME~1\mposton\LOCALS~1\Temp\1SV6YYKE.htm 12/1/2008
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 210 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 210

    To prohibit the application of certain restrictive eligibility 
 requirements to foreign nongovernmental organizations with respect to 
the provision of assistance under part I of the Foreign Assistance Act 
                                of 1961.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2017

Mrs. Shaheen (for herself, Ms. Collins, Ms. Baldwin, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. 
   Bennet, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Booker, Mr. Brown, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. 
    Cardin, Mr. Carper, Mr. Coons, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Durbin, Mrs. 
 Feinstein, Mr. Franken, Mrs. Gillibrand, Ms. Harris, Ms. Hassan, Mr. 
 Heinrich, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Kaine, Mr. King, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Leahy, 
  Mr. Markey, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Murphy, Mrs. Murray, Mr. 
 Peters, Mr. Reed, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Schatz, Mr. Schumer, Ms. Stabenow, 
  Mr. Tester, Mr. Udall, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Warren, Mr. Warner, Mr. 
  Whitehouse, Mr. Wyden, Ms. Cortez Masto, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Casey, and 
Mrs. McCaskill) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the application of certain restrictive eligibility 
 requirements to foreign nongovernmental organizations with respect to 
the provision of assistance under part I of the Foreign Assistance Act 
                                of 1961.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Global Health, Empowerment and 
Rights Act''.

SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE FOR FOREIGN NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS UNDER PART 
              I OF THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1961.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, regulation, or policy, 
in determining eligibility for assistance authorized under part I of 
the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.), foreign 
nongovernmental organizations--
            (1) shall not be ineligible for such assistance solely on 
        the basis of health or medical services, including counseling 
        and referral services, provided by such organizations with non-
        United States Government funds if such services do not violate 
        the laws of the country in which they are being provided and 
        would not violate United States Federal law if provided in the 
        United States; and
            (2) shall not be subject to requirements relating to the 
        use of non-United States Government funds for advocacy and 
        lobbying activities other than those that apply to United 
        States nongovernmental organizations receiving assistance under 
        part I of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION*

      In connection with the Annual Report of Retail Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Heywood Wilansky, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                      /s/ Heywood Wilansky
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      Heywood Wilansky, President and Chief
                                      Executive Officer

December 9, 2004

* This Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed "filed" for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability
of that section. This Certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except as otherwise stated in such filing.
11-5138-cr U.S. v. Betts UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 19 th day of June, two thousand thirteen. Present: ROBERT A. KATZMANN, BARRINGTON D. PARKER, JR., Circuit Judges , WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, District Judge
. *

________________________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee , v. No. 11-5138-cr WALIEK BETTS, aka Leek, aka Sealed Defendant #6, Defendant-Appellant , CORY EDWARDS, aka Wiggles, aka Sealed Defendant #1 et al. Defendants
.

_______________________________________________

* The Honorable William F. Kuntz, II, of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.For Appellee: P AUL D. S ILVER (John M. Katko, on the brief ), Assistant United States Attorneys, for Richard S. Hartunian, United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York, Albany, NY For Defendants-Appellant: J AMES P. E GAN (Lisa A. Peebles, on the brief ), Federal Public Defender’s Office, Syracuse, NY Appeal from the United States District C ourt for the Northen District of New York (Mordue, J. ). ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF , it is hereby ORDERED , ADJUDGED , and DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and hereby is AFFIRMED
. Defendant-Appellant Waliek Betts appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Northen District of New York (Mordue, J. ) dated November 16, 2011. In that order, the district court refused to reduce Betts’s sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) to a term of imprisonment that fell below his amended guideline range. We affirm for the reasons set forth in United States v. Clifton Stith , 11-4933-cr (2d Cir. May 30, 2013). We have considered the Defendant-Appellant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. For the reasons stated herein, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED
. FOR THE COURT: CATHERINE O’HAGAN WOLFE, CLERK

2
The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District 1

Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

___________

No. 95-2237

___________

Gerald L. Brumley, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Arkansas.

*

Dept. of Labor, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: March 6, 1996

 Filed: March 12, 1996

___________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

The District Court, concluding that the Privacy Act's two-year

1

statute of limitations barred Brumley's action, granted summary judgment

in favor of the Department of Labor. Brumley appeals. After careful

review, we do not find any error of law to warrant reversal. Accordingly,

the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001012884
<NAME> Rutherford-Moran Oil Corporation
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             465
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,692
<PP&E>                                         273,467
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,046
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 302,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,481
<BONDS>                                        120,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           256
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,452
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   302,554
<SALES>                                         16,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,120
<CGS>                                           12,182
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,527
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,948
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,407)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,593)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,814)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,814)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.54)
        

</TABLE>
Poly (potassium itaconate)

Structure not shown
NOTE:

DATE: January

15, 2010 TO: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR - 2005 - 0161 FROM: Jeff Herzog, Mechanical Engineer, U.S. EPA SUBJECT: Communications with Beta Anal yt ic Inc. Regarding Test Procedures to

Determine the Biobased Content of Solid, Liquid, and Gaseous Samples Using Radiocarbon Analysis On July 7, 2009 I spoke on the phone and exchanged emails with Thierry Sam Tamers, Director of Beta Analy tic Inc. regarding test procedure ASTM D6866 “Standard Test Methods for Determining the Biobased Content of Solid, L iquid, and Gaseous Samples Using Radiocarbon Analy sis”. In response to my questions, Mr. Thierry

related the following:

- Beta Anal yt ic Inc. does testing per methods B and C in ASTM D6866. - Test method B requires ~ 3 ml of sample - Test method C requires ~40 ml of sample - Cost per test is $595 for both method B and C - The cost per test may

come down if the number of tests they do increases. - Beta Anal yt ic commit s to getting tests completed within 3 day s. - The tes t equipment used for method B costs ~ $1,400,000 - The cost of the Liquid Scintillation Counting (LSC) test equipment used for methods A and C is ~ $15,000 to $20,000 - The estimates re garding the cost of testing equipment assume that basic lab equipment is already in place (fume hood, etc. .) - Man y labs have test equipment for methods A and C. Fewer labs have equipment for method B.