alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 205 (Monday, October 24, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 73192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25670]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Eighth RTCA SC-233 Addressing Human Factors/Pilot Interface 
Issues for Avionics Plenary

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Eighth Plenary of RTCA SC-233 Addressing Human Factors/Pilot 
Interface Issues for Avionics.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of Eighth Plenary of RTCA SC-233 Addressing Human Factors/Pilot 
Interface Issues for Avionics.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 15-17, 2016 08:30 a.m.-04:30 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: Cessna Employees Fitness 
Center, 6711 W 31st St S., Wichita, Kansas 67215.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Rebecca Morrison at 
rmorrison@rtca.org or 202-330-0654, or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th 
Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 
833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of the Eighth RTCA SC-233 Addressing Human 
Factors/Pilot Interface Issues for Avionics Plenary. The agenda will 
include the following:

Tuesday November 15, 2016

A.M.

     Introduction, Upcoming PMC Dates and Deliverable
     Review of TOR
     September meeting summary
     Roadmap for remaining items to be completed; notional 
schedule of activities remaining
     Consensus on document review process

P.M.

     Overview of the combined document and initial feedback
     Detailed review of document and identification of work to 
be done

Wednesday November 16, 2016

     Working Groups Break Out Sessions
     End of the Day Working Group Status Report Outs

Thursday November 17, 2016

A.M.

     Working Groups Break Out Session

P.M.

     Working Group Status
     Working group leader reports
     Follow-on actions
     Meeting Recap, Action Items, Key Dates
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 19, 2016.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management & Program Analyst, Partnership Contracts Branch, ANG-A17, 
NextGen, Procurement Services Division, Federal Aviation 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-25670 Filed 10-21-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
| 1.     | I am the Chief Executive Officer of Ocwen Financial Corporation (the “Registrant”).                                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                             |   |
| 2.     | I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that |
|   |                                                                                                                             |   |
|   | ●                                                                                                                          | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “periodic report”) containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|   |                                                                                                                             |   |
|   | ●                                                                                                                          | the information contained in the periodic report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods presented. |

| Name:  | /s/ Ronald M. Faris                   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| Date:  | February 28, 2011                     |   |

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0542 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. FRANK WEBB,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Kelley A. Barstad is granted an extension of time to and including March 23, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. No further extensions will be granted without an affidavit from the Court Reporter. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter. 03/01/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0542Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 1 2023
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 12, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 12, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0502. DON FAIRCLOTH v. NATHAN DEAL, GOVERNOR et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2015CV266412
# Euroopa Liidu C 265A/13.

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 265A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 58. köide13. august 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 265A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

58. köide13. august 2015

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Teated |
| | HALDUSMENETLUSED |
| | Nõukogu |
| 2015/C 265A/01 | Tühistamisteade | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

V   Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Nõukogu

2015/C 265A/01

Tühistamisteade

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

V Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Nõukogu

| 13.8.2015 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 265/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2015

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 265/1

---

TÜHISTAMISTEADE

(2015/C 265 A/01)

Valikumenetlus CONS/AD/113:

| — | direktor, õigustalitus, direktoraat 3 (välissuhted), |
| --- | --- |

—

direktor, õigustalitus, direktoraat 3 (välissuhted),

mille kohta avaldati teade Euroopa Liidu Teatajas
   (1), on tühistatud.

---

(1)  ELT C 119 A, 14.4.2015, lk 18.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Form
S-8 Nos. 33-59918, 33-59916, 33-59920, 33-91900, 33-92684, 33-19487, 33-99976
and 333-26565) pertaining to the Davstar Industries Ltd. Stock Option Plan,
1992 Employee Stock Option Plan, the Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan,
the Davstar Industries Ltd. 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, Dacomed 1989 Stock
Option Plan, 1996 Directors Non-Qualified Stock Incentive Plan, Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, Advanced Surgical 1992 Stock Plan and Employee Reserved Stock
Agreement, the X-Cardia 1996 Stock Option Plan and the Microsurge Stock Option
Plan of Imagyn Medical Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated
July 13, 1998, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Imagyn Medical
Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended March 31, 1998.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE
Costa Mesa, California
July 13, 1998
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance







Exhibit 10.2




PROMISSORY NOTE




	 	 	 
	$80,000.00

	 	August 15th, 2008






FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Global Clean Energy, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Maker”) promises to pay to
the order of Vision Capital Partners AA., Ltd. (“Lender”), at its principal office, or at such other place as may be
designated in writing by the holders of this Promissory Note (“Note”), the principal sum of EIGHTY THOUSAND 00/100
DOLLARS ($80,000.00) (the “Principal Sum”). The unpaid Principal Sum shall bear interest at 7.5% per annum and shall
be due in twelve (12) months.



All payments to be made under this Note shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America which
shall be legal tender for public and private debts at the time of payment.



In the event that an action is instituted to collect this Note, or any portion thereof, Maker promises to pay all
costs of collection, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys’ fees, court costs, and such other sums as the
court may establish.



In the event of a default under this Note when due, then the holder of this Note, at its election, may declare the
entire unpaid Principal Sum due and payable.



Every provision hereof is intended to be several. If any provision of this Note is determined, by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, such illegality, invalidity or unenforceability shall
not affect the other provisions hereof, which shall remain binding and enforceable.



This Note is made in the State of Maryland and it is mutually agreed that Maryland law shall apply to the
interpretation of the terms and conditions of this Note.



All agreements between the holder of this Note and Maker are hereby expressly limited so that in no contingency or
event whatsoever, whether by reason of deferment or acceleration of the maturity of this Note or otherwise, shall the
rate of interest hereunder exceed the maximum permissible under applicable law with respect to the holder. If, from
any circumstances whatsoever, the rate of interest resulting from the payment and/or accrual of any amount of interest
hereunder, at any time that payment of interest is due and/or at any time that interest is accrued, shall exceed the
limits prescribed by such applicable law, then the payment and/or accrual of such interest shall be reduced to that
resulting from the maximum rate of interest permissible under such applicable law. This provision shall never be
superseded or waived.


 


1









 





The makers, endorsers, and/or guarantors of this Note do hereby severally waive presentment, demand, protest and
notices of protest, demand, dishonor and nonpayment.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed as of the date first hereinabove set forth.



GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY, INC.



By:/s/ Kenneth Adessky
Kenneth Adessky,
C.F.O





 


2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0484

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ANDREW JOHN SMITH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 22, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 16 2023

08/16/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0484
exv10w02






EXHIBIT 10.02




GLU MOBILE INC.




SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION TERMS




KEVIN S. CHOU




Dated as of October 31, 2008



Following is a summary of the compensation terms for Kevin S. Chou, the Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary of Glu Mobile Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”):




	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Salary:

	 	$225,000		 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Target Cash Bonus:

	 	30% of base salary, earned and paid quarterly

	 
	 	 	 	 
	Bonus Plan Participation:

	 	Glu Mobile Executive Bonus Plan, dated as of April 9, 2008






Mr. Chou is also a party to a Change of Control and Severance Agreement with the Company, the form
of which is filed as Exhibit 10.02 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2008.
#### LAKEY v. McCARROLL.

No. 1891.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

Feb. 2, 1940.

Stinson, Hair, Brooks & Duke, of Abilene, for appellant.

Smith & Smith, of Anson, for appellee.

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

On April 14, 1939, this court handed down an opinion in the above-styled and numbered cause. The same is to be found in Tex. *820Civ.App., 131 S.W.2d 181. A motion for rehearing was filed therein, and the same has not been acted upon by this court. In the consideration of that motion this court concluded to certify certain questions to the Supreme Court of Texas. Also, there was a dissenting opinion in said cause by Associate Justice Funderburk. 131 S.W.2d 185. The questions certified are to he found in the opinion of the Supreme Court answering said questions. Lakey v. McCarroll, Tex.Sup., 134 S.W.2d 1016 (not yet published [in State Reports]).

According to the opinion of the Supreme Court there was error in this court’s disposition of said case. In the light of the answers to the questions certified, the judgment of the trial court should have been affirmed. Accordingly, the motion for rehearing is granted, and pursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135673 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135673 

 COA: 272217 
 Kent CC: 06-001490-FH;

 06-000908-FC 

MARQUIS DESHAUNE JENKINS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 11, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7594

FRANKLIN E. DENNISON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT E. WARD, Warden; MICHAEL MOORE, Commissioner; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-3365-10BD)

Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 30, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin E. Dennison, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Franklin E. Dennison filed an untimely notice of appeal. We

dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing

notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods

are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of

Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have

thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of

appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1).

The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district

court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on February 21, 1997;

Dennison’s notice of appeal was filed on October 26, 1998, which is

beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Dennison’s failure to note a

timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves

this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Dennison’s appeal. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability

and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
*OPINION ISSUED FEBRUARY 11, 2009*

#### MILDRED DAVIS VS. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

(CC-04-0360)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Andrew F. Tarr and Jason C. Workman, Attorneys at Law, for respondent.

*199PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted to the Court for decision upon a Stipulation entered into by claimant and respondent wherein certain facts and circumstances of the claim were agreed to as follows:

1. Respondent is responsible for the maintenance of W.Va. Route 61 in Fayette County.

2. Claimant alleges that on or around May 27,2004, her property suffered flood damage as a result of inadequate drains and culverts during a rain event.

3. For the purposes of settlement, respondent acknowledges culpability for the preceding incident.

4. Claimant and respondent believe that in this particular incident and under these particular circumstances that an award of Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000.00) would be a fair and reasonable amount to settle this claim.

5. The parties to this claim agree that the total sum of Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000.00) to be paid by respondent to the claimant in Claim No. CC-04-0360 will be a full and complete settlement, compromise, and resolution of all matters in controversy in said claim and full and complete satisfaction of any and all past and future claims claimant may have against respondent arising from the matters described in said claim.

The Court has reviewed the facts of the claim and finds that respondent was negligent in its maintenance of W.Va. Route 61 on the date of this incident; that the negligence of respondentwas the proximate cause of the damages sustained to claimant’s property; and that the amount of the damages agreed to by the parties is fair and reasonable. Thus, claimant may make a recovery for her loss.

Accordingly, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award in the amount of $12,000.00.

Award of $12,000.00.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,620,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       5,730,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              76,493,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        73,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  70,937,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                76,493,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,661,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,081,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (420,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (168,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (252,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (252,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2486 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2486

To repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and amendments to that 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 1, 2018

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and amendments to that 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Students Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE GUN-FREE SCHOOL ZONES ACT OF 1990 AND AMENDMENTS 
              TO THAT ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by striking subsection (q).
    (b) Related Amendments.--
            (1) Section 921(a) of such title is amended by striking 
        paragraphs (25) through (27) and redesignating paragraphs (28), 
        (29), and (32) through (35) as paragraphs (25) through (30), 
        respectively.
            (2) Section 924(a) of such title is amended--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ``(k), or 
                (q)'' and inserting ``or (k)''; and
                    (B) by striking paragraph (4) and redesignating 
                paragraphs (5) through (7) as paragraphs (4) through 
                (6), respectively.
            (3) The Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 (18 U.S.C. 921 
        note, 922 note; section 1702 of Public Law 101-647; 104 Stat. 
        4844-4845) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```