26950 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 8, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

paragraph terminates the requirements of AD 

2010–21–12, Amendment 39–16472 (75 FR 

63042, October 14, 2010), for that airplane 

only. 

(l) ADs Affected by Accomplishment of 

Paragraph (h) of This AD 

Accomplishing the actions required by 

paragraph (h) of this AD terminates the 

requirements of the following ADs for that 

airplane only: AD 98–06–26, Amendment 

39–10404 (63 FR 13502, March 20, 1998); AD 

98–13–32, Amendment 39–10623 (63 FR 

34581, June 25, 1998); AD 2007–04–23, 

Amendment 39–14956 (72 FR 8615, February 

27, 2007); and AD 2008–20–03, Amendment 

39–15682 (73 FR 56452, September 29, 2008). 

(m) Other AD Affected by Accomplishment 

of Paragraph (h) of This AD 

Accomplishing the actions required by 

paragraph (h) of this AD terminates the 

requirements of AD 2004–14–01, 

Amendment 39–13710 (69 FR 41391, July 9, 

2004), for that airplane only. 

(n) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Send information to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez, 

Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, 

ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 

227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using 

any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 

principal inspector, or lacking a principal 

inspector, the manager of the local flight 

standards district office/certificate holding 

district office. The AMOC approval letter 

must specifically reference this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(o) Related Information 

Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety 

Agency (EASA) Airworthiness Directive 

2009–0269R1, dated March 11, 2010, and the 

service information identified in paragraphs 

(o)(1) through (o)(5) of this AD, for related 

information. 

(1) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–32– 

097, dated September 30, 1995. 

(2) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–32– 

132, dated December 5, 2001. 

(3) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–32– 

155, dated July 23, 2009. 

(4) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–32– 

156, Revision 1, dated June 29, 2009. 

(5) Messier-Dowty Service Bulletin F100– 

32–112, dated July 17, 2009. 

(p) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the following service information 

under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 on 

the date specified. 

(2) You must use the following service 

information to do the actions required by this 

AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(3) The following service information was 

approved for IBR on June 12, 2012. 

(i) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–32– 

097, dated September 30, 1995. 

(ii) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–32– 

132, dated December 5, 2001. 

(iii) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–32– 

155, dated July 23, 2009. 

(iv) Messier-Dowty Service Bulletin F100– 

32–112, dated July 17, 2009. 

(4) The following service information was 

approved for IBR November 18, 2010 (75 FR 

63042, October 14, 2010). 

(i) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–32– 

156, Revision 1, dated June 29, 2009. 

(5) For Fokker service information 

identified in this AD, contact Fokker Services 

B.V., Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 231, 

2150 AE Nieuw-Vennep, the Netherlands; 

telephone +31 (0)252–627–350; fax +31 

(0)252–627–211; email 

technicalservices.fokkerservices@stork.com; 

Internet http://www.myfokkerfleet.com. 

(6) For Messier-Dowty service information 

identified in this AD, contact Messier 

Services Americas, Customer Support Center, 

45360 Severn Way, Sterling, Virginia 20166– 

8910; telephone 703–450–8233; fax 703–404– 

1621; Internet https:// 

techpubs.services.messier-dowty.com. 

(7) You may review copies of the service 

information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

Washington. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, call 

425–227–1221. 

(8) You may also review copies of the 

service information that is incorporated by 

reference at the National Archives and 

Records Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at an NARA facility, call 202–741– 

6030, or go to 

http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/ 

code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 26, 

2012. 

Michael J. Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10829 Filed 5–7–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 81 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0249; FRL–9669–7] 

Designation of Areas for Air Quality 

Planning Purposes; California; 

Western Mojave Desert Ozone 

Nonattainment Area; Reclassification 

to Severe 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: Under the Clean Air Act 

(CAA or Act), EPA is granting a request 

from the State of California to reclassify 

the Western Mojave Desert ozone 

nonattainment area from ‘‘Moderate’’ to 

‘‘Severe-15’’ for the 1997 8-hour ozone 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS). EPA is also reclassifying 

Indian country under the jurisdiction of 

the Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission 

Indians of California located within the 

boundaries of the Western Mojave 

Desert area in the same manner, 

following consultation with the Tribe, to 

maintain consistency with the 

classification of the surrounding areas 

under State jurisdiction. 

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is 

effective on June 7, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket 

number, EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0249, for 

this action. Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at www.regulations.gov 

and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California. While all documents in the 

docket are listed at 

www.regulations.gov, some information 

may be publicly available only at the 

hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted 

material, large maps), and some may not 

be publicly available in either location 

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Doris Lo, Air Planning Office (AIR–2), 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region IX, (415) 972–3959, 

lo.doris@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, the terms 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

I. Reclassification of Western Mojave 

Desert to Severe-15 Ozone 

Nonattainment 

Effective June 15, 2004, EPA 

designated and classified the ‘‘Los 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 8, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 26951 

1This action applies only to the classification of 

this ozone nonattainment area for purposes of the 

1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA intends to take 

separate actions to designate and classify areas of 

the nation that meet or do not meet the 2008 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS. 

2See February 14, 2008 letter from James N. 

Goldstene, Executive Officer, CARB, to Wayne 

Nastri, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 9. In addition to the 

Western Mojave Desert area, CARB requested that 

EPA reclassify the Ventura County and Sacramento 

Metro ozone nonattainment areas under CAA 

section 181(b)(3) to higher classifications for the 

1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Pursuant to this 

request, EPA reclassified the Ventura County area 

from ‘‘Moderate’’ to ‘‘Serious’’ nonattainment 

effective June 19, 2008 (73 FR 29073, May 20, 

2008), and reclassified the Sacramento Metro area 

from ‘‘Serious’’ to ‘‘Severe-15’’ nonattainment 

effective June 4, 2010 (75 FR 24409, May 5, 2010). 

3CARB subsequently submitted a SIP revision for 

this area to address the attainment demonstration 

and related requirements for severe-17 ozone 

nonattainment areas. See July 22, 2008 letter and 

enclosures from James N. Goldstene, Executive 

Officer, CARB, to Wayne Nastri, Regional 

Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 9. 

4See March 14, 2012 letter from James N. 

Goldstene, Executive Director, CARB, to Jared 

Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. 

5Section 181(b) of the CAA does not authorize 

EPA to grant a request for reclassification of a 

‘‘Moderate’’ ozone nonattainment area to ‘‘Severe17.’’ See, e.g., EPA’s final rule reclassifying the San 

Joaquin Valley ozone nonattainment area, 66 FR 

56476 at 56478 (November 8, 2001). 

6See email dated April 11, 2012 from Marshall 

Cheung, Tribal EPA Director, Twenty-Nine Palms 

Band of Mission Indians of California, to Colleen 

McKaughan, Associate Director, EPA Region IX Air 

Division, Re: West Mojave Desert Reclassification or 

‘‘Bump-up.’’ 

Angeles and San Bernardino Counties 

(Western Mojave Desert)’’ area in 

California (Western Mojave Desert) 

under the CAA as ‘‘Subpart 2/ 

Moderate’’ nonattainment for the 1997 

8-hour ozone NAAQS.1 See 69 FR 

23858, at 23884 (April 30, 2004) and 40 

CFR 81.305. Our classification of the 

Western Mojave Desert area as a 

‘‘Moderate’’ ozone nonattainment area 

established a requirement that the area 

attain the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS as 

expeditiously as practicable, but no later 

than six years from the date of 

designation as nonattainment, i.e., June 

15, 2010. 

On February 14, 2008, the California 

Air Resources Board (CARB) submitted 

a request that EPA reclassify three 

California areas (including the Western 

Mojave Desert area) designated 

nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone standard.2 For the Western 

Mojave Desert ozone nonattainment 

area, CARB requested reclassification 

from ‘‘Moderate’’ to ‘‘Severe-17.’’ 3 On 

March 14, 2012, CARB submitted a 

clarification requesting that EPA 

reclassify the Western Mojave Desert 

area from ‘‘Moderate’’ to ‘‘Severe.’’ 4

Consistent with section 181(b)(3) of the 

CAA, we are granting the State’s request 

and reclassifying the Western Mojave 

Desert area from ‘‘Moderate’’ to ‘‘Severe15’’ nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS.5 We are not establishing 

a schedule for plan submissions at this 

time and intend to do so in a subsequent 

action, if necessary. 

Because the State of California does 

not have jurisdiction over Indian 

country located within its borders, 

CARB’s request to reclassify the Western 

Mojave Desert area does not apply to 

Indian country under the jurisdiction of 

the Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission 

Indians of California, which is located 

within the boundaries of the Western 

Mojave Desert nonattainment area. EPA 

implements federal Clean Air Act 

programs, including reclassifications, in 

this area of Indian country consistent 

with our discretionary authority under 

sections 301(a) and 301(d)(4) of the 

Clean Air Act. EPA has consulted with 

the Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission 

Indians of California regarding CARB’s 

request and the Tribe has agreed to 

reclassification of its tribal land within 

the Western Mojave Desert 

nonattainment area consistent with the 

surrounding areas under State 

jurisdiction.6 Accordingly, we are 

reclassifying the entire Western Mojave 

Desert nonattainment area (both the 

portion under State jurisdiction and the 

portion under the Tribe’s jurisdiction) 

from ‘‘Moderate’’ to ‘‘Severe-15’’ for the 

1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 

We are approving CARB’s 

reclassification request under section 

181(b)(3) of the Act, which provides for 

‘‘voluntary reclassification’’ and states: 

‘‘The Administrator shall grant the 

request of any State to reclassify a 

nonattainment area in that State in 

accordance with table 1 of subsection (a) 

of this section to a higher classification. 

The Administrator shall publish a 

notice in the Federal Register of any 

such request and of action by the 

Administrator granting the request.’’ 

The provision for voluntary 

reclassification has been brought 

forward as part of the transition from 

the 1-hour ozone standard to the 1997 

8-hour ozone standard. See 40 CFR 

51.903(b) (‘‘A State may request a higher 

classification for any reason in 

accordance with section 181(b)(3) of the 

CAA’’) and 40 CFR 51.903(a), Table 1. 

Because the plain language of section 

181(b)(3) mandates that we approve 

such a request, EPA is granting CARB’s 

request for voluntary reclassification 

under section 181(b)(3) for the Western 

Mojave Desert ozone nonattainment 

area, and EPA is reclassifying the area 

from ‘‘Moderate’’ to ‘‘Severe-15’’ for the 

1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. With 

respect to that portion of the Western 

Mojave Desert area that is under the 

jurisdiction of the Twenty-Nine Palms 

Band of Mission Indians of California, 

EPA has consulted with the Tribe and 

the Tribe has agreed to reclassification 

of the area from ‘‘Moderate’’ to ‘‘Severe15’’ consistent with the surrounding 

areas under State jurisdiction. As a 

result of this action, Western Mojave 

Desert must now attain the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS as expeditiously as 

practicable, but no later than fifteen 

years from the date of designation as 

nonattainment, i.e., June 15, 2019. EPA 

will address in future rulemaking 

actions, as necessary, any issues relating 

to timing and content of plan 

submissions under this new 

classification. 

EPA has determined that today’s 

action falls under the ‘‘good cause’’ 

exemption in section 553(b)(3)(B) of the 

Administrative Procedure Act (APA) 

which, upon finding ‘‘good cause,’’ 

authorizes agencies to dispense with 

public participation where public notice 

and comment procedures are 

‘‘impracticable, unnecessary or contrary 

to the public interest.’’ With respect to 

that portion of the Western Mojave 

Desert area that is under State 

jurisdiction, public notice and 

opportunity for comment prior to 

today’s action are unnecessary because 

EPA’s reclassification of the Western 

Mojave Desert area to ‘‘Severe-15’’ is 

mandated by the CAA and does not 

involve any exercise of discretion. 

Public notice and comment are also 

unnecessary with respect to our 

reclassification of Indian country under 

the jurisdiction of the Twenty-Nine 

Palms Band of Mission Indians of 

California located within the Western 

Mojave Desert area, because the Tribe 

has agreed to reclassification of these 

tribal lands consistent with the 

surrounding State lands. 

II. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 

51735, October 4, 1993), this action is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and 

therefore is not subject to review by the 

Office of Management and Budget. With 

respect to lands under State jurisdiction, 

voluntary reclassifications under section 

181(b)(3) of the CAA are based solely 

upon requests by the State and EPA is 

required under the CAA to grant them. 

These actions do not, in and of 

themselves, impose any new 

requirements on any sector of the 

economy. In addition, because the 

statutory requirements are clearly 

defined with respect to the differently 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

26952 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 8, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

classified areas, and because those 

requirements are automatically triggered 

by classification, reclassification does 

not impose a materially adverse impact 

under Executive Order 12866. With 

respect to Indian country, 

reclassifications do not establish 

deadlines for air quality plans or plan 

revisions. For these reasons, this action 

is also not subject to Executive Order 

13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations 

That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 

22, 2001). 

In addition, I certify that this rule will 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This action does not 

contain any unfunded mandate or 

significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments, as described in the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

(Pub. L. 104–4), because EPA is required 

to grant requests by States for voluntary 

reclassifications and such 

reclassifications in and of themselves do 

not impose any federal 

intergovernmental mandate, and 

because tribes are not subject to 

implementation plan submittal 

deadlines that apply to states as a result 

of reclassifications. 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000) requires EPA to 

develop an accountable process to 

ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by 

tribal officials in the development of 

regulatory policies that have tribal 

implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal 

implications’’ is defined in the 

Executive Order to include regulations 

that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on 

one or more Indian tribes, on the 

relationship between the Federal 

government and Indian tribes, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

government and Indian tribes.’’ One 

Indian tribe (the Twenty-Nine Palms 

Band of Mission Indians of California) 

has jurisdiction over Indian country 

located within the boundaries of the 

Western Mojave Desert area. EPA 

implements federal Clean Air Act 

programs, including reclassifications, in 

this area of Indian country consistent 

with our discretionary authority under 

sections 301(a) and 301(d)(4) of the 

Clean Air Act. EPA has concluded that 

this final rule might have tribal 

implications for the purposes of 

Executive Order 13175 but will not 

impose substantial direct costs upon the 

Tribe, nor does it preempt Tribal law. 

This final rule does not affect 

implementation of new source review 

for new or modified stationary sources 

proposed in Indian country within the 

boundaries of the Western Mojave 

Desert area because such sources are 

already subject to the permitting 

requirements that apply in ‘‘Severe’’ 

nonattainment areas for purposes of the 

1-hour ozone NAAQS. This 

reclassification might affect projects 

proposed in this area of Indian country 

that require Federal permits, approvals, 

or funding under EPA’s General 

Conformity rule because of the lower de 

minimis thresholds triggered by 

reclassification (25 tons per year for 

volatile organic compounds or oxides of 

nitrogen). Given the potential 

implications, EPA contacted tribal 

officials to provide an opportunity for 

meaningful and timely input into this 

action. As discussed in section I of this 

document, on April 11, 2012, the Tribe 

agreed to the reclassification of its tribal 

lands within the Western Mojave Desert 

area consistent with the surrounding 

State lands. 

This action also does not have 

Federalism implications because it does 

not have substantial direct effects on the 

States, on the relationship between the 

national government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, 

August 10, 1999). This action does not 

alter the relationship or the distribution 

of power and responsibilities 

established in the Clean Air Act. 

This rule also is not subject to 

Executive Order 13045, ‘‘Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997), because EPA interprets 

Executive Order 13045 as applying only 

to those regulatory actions that concern 

health or safety risks, such that the 

analysis required under section 5–501 of 

the Executive Order has the potential to 

influence the regulation. 

Reclassification actions do not 

involve technical standards and thus, 

the requirements of section 12(d) of the 

National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 

272 note) do not apply. This rule does 

not impose an information collection 

burden under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, 

February 16, 1994) establishes federal 

executive policy on environmental 

justice. Its main provision directs 

federal agencies, to the greatest extent 

practicable and permitted by law, to 

make environmental justice part of their 

mission by identifying and addressing, 

as appropriate, disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects of their programs, 

policies, and activities on minority 

populations and low-income 

populations in the United States. This 

reclassification action relates to ozone, a 

pollutant that is regional in nature, and 

is not the type of action that could result 

in the types of local impacts addressed 

in Executive Order 12898. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by 

the Small Business Regulatory 

Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 

generally provides that before a rule 

may take effect, the agency 

promulgating the rule must submit a 

rule report, which includes a copy of 

the rule, to each House of the Congress 

and to the Comptroller General of the 

United States. EPA will submit a report 

containing this rule and other required 

information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. 

House of Representatives, and the 

Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by July 9, 2012. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this rule for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, National parks, Ozone, 

Wilderness areas. 

Dated: April 26, 2012. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

Part 81, chapter I, title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 81—[Amended] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 81 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart C—[Amended] 

■ 2. Section 81.305 is amended in the 

table for ‘‘California—Ozone (8-hour 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 8, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 26953 

Standard)’’ by revising the entry for 

‘‘Los Angeles and San Bernardino 

Counties (Western Mojave Desert), CA’’ 

to read as follows: 

§ 81.305 California. 

* * * * * 

CALIFORNIA—OZONE

(8-Hour Standard) 

Designated area 

Designation a Category/classification 

Date 1 Type Date 1 Type 

*******

Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties (Western Mojave Desert), 

CA.

.................... Nonattainment .. 6/7/2012 Subpart 2/Severe-15. 

Los Angeles County (part) ...................................................................... .................... Nonattainment .. 6/7/2012 Subpart 2/Severe-15. 

That portion of Los Angeles County which lies north and east of a 

line described as follows: Beginning at the Los Angeles-San 

Bernardino County boundary and running west along the Township line common to Township 3 North and Township 2 North, 

San Bernardino Base and Meridian; then north along the range 

line common to Range 8 West and Range 9 West; then west 

along the Township line common to Township 4 North and 

Township 3 North; then north along the range line common to 

Range 12 West and Range 13 West to the southeast corner of 

Section 12, Township 5 North and Range 13 West; then west 

along the south boundaries of Sections 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, and 7, 

Township 5 North and Range 13 West to the boundary of the 

Angeles National Forest which is collinear with the range line 

common to Range 13 West and Range 14 West; then north and 

west along the Angeles National Forest boundary to the point of 

intersection with the Township line common to Township 7 

North and Township 6 North (point is at the northwest corner of 

Section 4 in Township 6 North and Range 14 West); then west 

along the Township line common to Township 7 North and 

Township 6 North; then north along the range line common to 

Range 15 West and Range 16 West to the southeast corner of 

Section 13, Township 7 North and Range 16 West; then along 

the south boundaries of Sections 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18, 

Township 7 North and Range 16 West; then north along the 

range line common to Range 16 West and Range 17 West to 

the north boundary of the Angeles National Forest (collinear 

with the Township line common to Township 8 North and Township 7 North); then west and north along the Angeles National 

Forest boundary to the point of intersection with the south 

boundary of the Rancho La Liebre Land Grant; then west and 

north along this land grant boundary to the Los Angeles-Kern 

County boundary.

San Bernardino County (part) ................................................................. .................... Nonattainment .. 6/7/2012 Subpart 2/Severe-15. 

That portion of San Bernardino County which lies north and east 

of a line described as follows: Beginning at the San BernardinoRiverside County boundary and running north along the range 

line common to Range 3 East and Range 2 East, San 

Bernardino Base and Meridian; then west along the Township 

line common to Township 3 North and Township 2 North to the 

San Bernardino-Los Angeles County boundary; And that portion 

of San Bernardino County which lies south and west of a line 

described as follows: latitude 35 degrees, 10 minutes north and 

longitude 115 degrees, 45 minutes west.

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2012–11076 Filed 5–7–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES