alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, November 28, 2000, 1 pm to November 28, 2000, 2:30 pm, NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 17, 2000, 65 FR 69568-69570.                

The meeting times have been changed to 3:30 pm to 4:30 pm. The date and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

      ( print page 76656)    
Dated: November, 28, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-31201 Filed 12-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

The following statement is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission solely for purposes of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC  20549

Re: BayCorp Holdings, Ltd.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the report of BayCorp Holdings, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrycia T. Barnard, Vice President of
Finance and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial
          condition and result of operations of BayCorp Holdings,
          Ltd.



Date: April 23, 2004  /s/ Patrycia T. Barnard
                      ---------------------------------
                      Patrycia T. Barnard
                      Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
                      (chief accounting officer)







A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to BayCorp Holdings, Ltd. and
will be retained by BayCorp Holdings, Ltd. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99

                             DIAMOND HOME SERVICES, INC.
                          ANNOUNCES STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM



     WOODSTOCK, Ill. (April 30, 1997) - Diamond Home Services, Inc.
     (Nasdaq/NM:DHMS) today announced that its Board of Directors has authorized
     the repurchase of up to 500,000 of the Company's outstanding common shares.

          Share purchases are authorized to be made by the Company from time to
     time in open-market or privately negotiated transactions as, in the opinion
     of management, market conditions warrant.  The repurchased shares will be
     added to the Company's treasury shares and will be available for general
     corporate purposes.

          C. Stephen Clegg, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
     said, "The decision to buy back the Company's stock underscores
     management's confidence in the Company's future and is an opportunity to
     further build and maximize shareholder value."

          Diamond Home Services, Inc. is a leading national marketer and
     contractor of installed home improvement products, including roofing
     systems, gutters, doors and fencing.  The Company markets its installed
     home improvement products and services directly to consumers, primarily
     under the "SEARS" brand name.  Through its finance subsidiary, Marquise
     Financial Services, Inc., the Company also offers financing to its
     customers.  The Company has 75 sales offices located in major cities across
     the U.S. providing the Company with a presence in markets covering
     approximately 80% of the owner-occupied households in the U.S.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 23, 2019

Order 

Clerk

August 23, 2019

158486(72)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 158486

v COA: 337686

Tuscola CC: 13-012652-FH; 16-013674-FH

JOHN DAVID VANDERPOOL,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to file a corrected 

supplemental brief is GRANTED. The corrected brief submitted on August 22, 2019, is 

accepted for filing.
In-Person Attendees: High-Intensity Discharge Lamps Test Procedures Meeting

Meeting Date: Thursday, January 19, 2012

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax 

Amann, Jennifer Thorne Director, Buildings 

Program

American Council for an EnergyEfficient Economy (ACEEE) 529 14th Street NW Suite 600 Washington DC 20045 202-507-4000 x 4015 202-427-6721 jaman

Anderson, Susan Isenhour

Manager, Energy Relations

Osram Sylvania 100 Endicott Street Danvers MA 01923 978-750-2864 978-646-6582 susan

Boesenberg, Alex Manager, Regulatory 

Affairs

National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA)

1300 North 17th Street, Suite 1752

Rosslyn VA 22209 703-841-3268 703-841-3368 alex.b

Brookman, Douglas Facilitator Public Solutions, Inc. 108 Newburg Avenue Baltimore MD 21228 410-719-0580 410-719-0581 publicCook, Keith Vice President

Technology Policy& Standards Lighting

Philips Electronics North America 1050 K Street NW

Suite 900

Washington DC 20001 202-962-8559 202-962-8560 keith.

Edwards, Brenda J Program Support 

Specialist

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue SWMailstop EE-2J

Washington DC 20585 202-596-2945 202-586-4617 brend

Howley, Joseph G Manager, Industry 

Relations and Environmental Marketing

GE Lighting 1975 Noble Road Bldg.

Suite 307E

Cleveland OH 44112 216-266-9729 N/A josep

Kaarsberg, Tina Project Manager Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence Ave, 

SW

Washington DC 20585 202-586-6590 202-586-4617 tina.k

Kohl, Elizabeth J. (Betsy) Attorney-Advisor/General 

Council

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue SW

Washington DC 20585 202-586-7796 202-586-4116 Elizab

Mauer, Joanna Technical Advocacy 

Coordinator

Appliance Standards Awareness Project (ASAP)

529 14th Street NWSuite 600

Washington DC 20045 202-507-4034 N/A jmaue

McGaraghan, Michael Senior Project Manager Energy Solutions 1610 Harrison Street Oakland CA 94612 510-482-4420 

x 242

510-482-4421 mmcg

Myer, Michael Lighting Emgineer Pacific Northwest National 

Laboratory (PNNC)

57 Bedford Street, Suite 101

Lexington MA 02420 781-861-2321 N/A micha

Steele, Lindsay Senior Research 

Scientist

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)

902 Battelle Blvd, PO Box 999, MSIN K6-05

Richland WA 99352 509-371-7268 N/A lsteel

lindsa

Steward, Heidi E. Research Scientist Pacific Northwest National 

Laboratory (PNNL)

620 SW 5th Ave, Suite 810 Portland OR 97204 503-417-7566 503-417-2175 heidi.

Walker, Matthew Consultant Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1801 K Street, NW, Suite 

500

Washington DC 20006-1301 202-481-8482 202-973-2401 matth

Walker, Merry N/A Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1801 K Street, NW, Suite 

500

Washington DC 20006-1301 202-481-7344 202-973-2401 merry
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1549** 

CLARK PHILOGENE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. IA2, INC. , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. ( 1:15

- cv - 00180

- TSE

- IDD )

Submitted : September 17, 2015 Decided: October 2, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Clark Philogene, Appellant Pro Se. Joon Hwang, Elizabeth Anne Lalik, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Clark Philogene appe als the district court ’ s order dismissing with prejudice Philogene’s civil complaint in which he asserted employment discrimination claims. The district court found that it lacked subject

- matter jurisdiction over the complaint, because Philogene “failed t o file a charge of discrimination as required by 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

- 5(e)(1) within the statutory period , ” and failed to establish grounds for equitably tolling the applicable 300

- day period for filing such a charge. See Philogene v. IA2, Inc. , No. 1:15

- cv - 00180

- TSE

IDD , slip op. at 2

- 3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 2 4 , 2015)
. We have previously observed that the “failure to timely file an EEOC charge . . . does not deprive the district court of subject matter jurisdiction
. ” See Hentosh v. Old Dominion Univ. , 767 F.3d 413, 417 (4th Cir. 2014)
. But we may affirm on any ground apparent in the record. See United States ex rel. Drakeford v. Tuomey , 792 F.3d 364, 375 (4th Cir. 2015). And, after review, we agree that each act of alleged discrimination set forth in the comp laint took place more than 300 days before Philogene filed his EEOC charge. Accordingly, Philogene’s claims are time

- barred, see Agolli v. Office Depot, Inc. , 548 F. App’ x 871, 875 (4th Cir. 2013) , and we affirm the district
court ’s order on that basis
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented3 in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Form of Waiver



 Exhibit 10.2 
 ANNEX B 
 FORM OF WAIVER 
 In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s participation in the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily waive any
claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or benefits that are required to comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008.

 I acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and
agreements (including so-called “golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they relate to the period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the
TARP Capital Purchase Program. 
 This waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related to the requirements
imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation a claim for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim
about the effect of these regulations on my employment relationship.
Exhibit 10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
 Emergency Economic Stabilization Act Acknowledgement and Agreement 
 This Acknowledgement and Agreement
applies to (1) the revised Change in Control Agreement between Provident Bankshares Corporation and the Executive named below, effective January 1, 2009, and (2) any bonus or incentive compensation arrangement for the Executive.

 The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”) may restrict compensation paid to “senior executive officers” during the
period that the United States Treasury holds equity or debt positions of a financial institution resulting from a purchase under the “Troubled Asset Relief Program” or the “Capital Purchase Program”. EESA also may prohibit or
restrict “golden parachute payments” to senior executive officers during that period. 
 Provident Bank may elect to participate in the Troubled
Asset Relief Program and/or the Capital Purchase Program. 
 The undersigned Executive may be considered a “senior executive officer”, bonus and
incentive compensation for the Executive may be subject to the EESA prohibitions/restrictions, and payments under the Change in Control Agreement may constitute “golden parachute payments” that are subject to the prohibitions/restrictions.
Further guidance from the Treasury Department and other federal government agencies is required before these issues can be resolved. 
 By signing below, the
Executive acknowledges and agrees that certain benefits promised under the revised Change in Control Agreement and any bonus and incentive compensation plans may need to be prohibited or restricted to the extent required by EESA. 
 Under the Capital Purchase Program, the Executive must give the United States Treasury a waiver releasing any claims the Executive may have as a result of Treasury
regulations that modify the terms of benefit plans, arrangements and agreements so as to eliminate any provisions that would not be in compliance with the executive compensation and corporate governance requirements of EESA. By signing below, the
Executive agrees to grant such waiver to the extent required by EESA. 
  

					
	WITNESS:	 		 	EXECUTIVE:
			
	  	 		 	  
		 		 	Name:
		 		 	Title:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51239

Summary Calendar

CAROL JOHNENE MORRIS

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:04-CV-139

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Carol Johnene Morris, former federal prisoner #76547-080, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. In that § 2241

petition, Morris argued that because her state and federal sentences should have

run concurrently, she was entitled to a full credit against her federal sentence,

and her supervised release term constituted an illegal extension of her sentence.

Morris was released from Bureau of Prisons custody in July 2004 and completed

her concurrent, three-year terms of supervised release during the pendency of

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 13, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 05-51239

2

this appeal. As a result, Morris’s claims have been rendered moot. See Spencer

v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278-79 (5th

Cir. 1987). Therefore, this appeal is dismissed as moot. 

Morris has filed several habeas applications challenging her federal and

state convictions and sentences, as well as numerous civil rights suits pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In 2000, Morris was barred from proceeding in forma

pauperis pursuantto 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). In 2006, Morris was barred from filing

any documents or pleadings in the Western District of Texas without prior

written consent of a United States District Judge or Magistrate Judge. Morris

is warned that future repetitive or frivolous filings in this court or any court

subject to this court’s jurisdiction will result in the imposition of sanctions,

including dismissal, monetary sanctions, and further restrictions on her ability

to file pleadings in this court and any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION *

      In connection with the Annual Report of Retail Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James A. McGrady, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                     /s/  James A. McGrady
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     James A. McGrady, Executive Vice President,
                                     Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

December 9, 2004

* This Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed "filed" for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability
of that section. This Certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except as otherwise stated in such filing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, Thomas F. August,President and Chief Executive Officer, of Prentiss Properties Trust (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”): 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section78o(d)); and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Registrant. 

 

/s/ Thomas F. August

Thomas F. August 

President & ChiefExecutive Officer 

May 7, 2004 

 

STATE OF TEXAS§ 

COUNTY OF DALLAS§ 

 

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 7th day of May, 2004. 

/s/ Lana Mann

Lana Mann 

May 7, 2004 

Notary Public 

My Commission Expires: 5/26/2005 

Official Seal 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, **or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906**, hasbeen provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STEPHEN WINN,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 24, 2020

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 0103012308 (N)

§

§

§

Submitted: January 22, 2020

Decided: March 3, 2020

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; TRAYNOR and MONTGOMERY-REEVES,

Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion 

to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below should be 

affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court’s order, 

dated December 23, 2019, summarily dismissing the appellant’s fifth motion for 

postconviction relief. The appellant has not pleaded with particularity new evidence 

of actual innocence or that a new, retroactive rule of constitutional law renders his 
2

conviction invalid.1 Nor has he asserted any claim that the Superior Court lacked 

jurisdiction.

2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is 

GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor 

Justice

 

1 DEL. SUPER. CT. CRIM. R. 61(d)(2).

2

Id. R. 61(i)(5).