alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
f8k0813_x103-riic.htm


    Exhibit 10.3
Shareholders' Meeting Royal Invest Dwvelopment and Service B.V.
b

    
Minutes
of the Extra-ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders of Royal Invest
Development and Services B.V. ("the Com­pany"), a private company with
limited liabi­lity with its registered seat in Amsterdam, The
Nether­lands, held on October 22, 2008.

    


    The
meeting appoints as chairman Mr Jerry Gruenbaum, law­fully representing the
common and preferential sharehol­der of the Compa­ny, Royal Invest
International Corp. The preferred shareholder also being present at the meeting
is ECM Hoff Holding B.V.

    


    The
chairman appoints as secretary Mr L.J.C.M. Kassing.

    


    The
chairman opens the meeting and records that all shares issued by the Company are
represented at the meeting and that no regis­tered depository receipts have
been issued with the co-operation of the Company nor that the right of usufruct
has been attached to any share nor that any share has been pledged.

    


    So,
despite the fact that no notice as prescribed by the Arti­cles of
Association and/or the law has been given, all unani­mous resolutions can be
passed legally.

    


    The
following resolutions are passed unanimously:

    


    
      	
              I.  

            	
              to
      accept the resignation as the director Mr D. Havenaar of the company and
      to honourable discharge him from his liabilities for the conduct of the
      affairs of the company and give him full
  discharge;

            


    

    


    
      	
              II.  

            	
              to
      accept the appointment of Mr. L.J.C.M. Kassing residing in Belgium as
      managing director of the company and to be paid by Royal Invest
      International Corp for his services as part of RIIC’s management team a
      consideration of € 15.000 per month with a minimum term for services of
      one year. RIIC will enter into a separate management services agreement
      for this purpose;

            


    

    


    


    There
being no other business to be put before the meeting the chairman then
termin­ates the meeting, after which these minutes were finalized on
November 6, 2008 and signed by him and the secre­tary in
fourfold.

    


    


    /s/ Jerry
Gruenbaum                                                                       
/s/ L.J.C.M.
Kassing

    The
chairman                                                                                    The
secretary
Exhibit 99.1




                 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Peter P. Gombrich, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of
Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify, to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2002 of the Registrant (the "Report"), that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
            material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.

Date:  July 18, 2003

                                                 /s/  Peter P. Gombrich
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 Peter P. Gombrich


NOTE:  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by Molecular
Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by law,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kelcy L. Warren, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 11, 2009



/s/ Kelcy L. WarrenKelcy L. WarrenChief Executive Officer


* A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to
and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MeriStar
Hospitality Corporation (the Issuer) for the three months ended March 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Paul W. Whetsell, Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m
or 78o(d)); and     
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.

Date:  May 15, 2003

| |  |                                                                          
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Paul W. Whetsell                                                     
| |  |                                                                          
| |  | Paul W. Whetsell
Chief Executive Officer
MeriStar Hospitality Corporation

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to MeriStar Hospitality Corporation and will be retained by
MeriStar Hospitality Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY


ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MEDITE Cancer
Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
E. Patterson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





Date:
April 14, 2017


/s/ David E.
PattersonDavid E. PattersonChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
### AGENDA: 11

BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

Memorandum

To: Chairperson Gioia and Members

of the Board of Directors

From: Jack P. Broadbent

Executive Officer/APCO

Date: October 25, 2012

Re: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Fine Par ticulate Matter Emissions

Inventory

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Recommend the Board of Directors adopt the attached emissions inventory for fine particulate matter and authorize staff to transmit the inventory to the California Air Resources Board (CARB).

BACKGROUND

As described in the staff report for Agenda Item #8 , the District is required to prepare and submit an “abbreviated” State Implementation Plan ( SIP) submittal to CARB and US Environmental Protection Agency for fine particulat e matter (PM2.5).

DISCUSSION

One of the required elements for the abbreviated SI P submittal is a PM2.5 emission inventory for the “attainment year”. The attainmen t year is the final year of the three-year period in which monitoring data shows that a region meets the standard (in this case, 2010). The inventory must include emissions of primary (di rectly-emitted) PM2.5, as well as precursors that contribute to secondary PM formatio n. The precursor pollutants are reactive organic gases (ROG), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), sulf ur dioxide (SO 2 ), and ammonia (NH 3 ). The inventory presents estimated emissions by sourc e category during the winter season, when the Bay Area typically experiences its highest PM levels. The PM2.5 emissions inventory table is attached.

Upon approval by the Board of Directors, the PM2.5 emissions inventory will be transmitted to CARB and EPA pursuant to federal air quality pla nning requirements for PM2.5. CARB will submit the emissions inventory to EPA as part of a package of revisions to the section of the California State Implementation Plan that ad dresses PM2.5 to comply with requirements of the federal Clean Air Act, includin g sections 110 and 172, and Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 51.2

BUDGET CONSIDERATION/FINANCIAL IMPACT:

None.

Respectfully submitted,

Jack P. Broadbent

Executive Officer/APCO

Prepared by: David Burch Reviewed by: Henry Hilken

Attachment: Table 1: Bay Area Winter Emissions Inve ntory for Primary PM2.5 and PM

Precursors: Year 2010
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00131-CV

IN RE CECILIA R. WILLIAMS PERKINS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF BERNICE 

JEANETTE WILLIAMS, DECEASED

Original Proceeding

ORDER

The Court, sua sponte, hereby orders a stay of all proceedings in the trial court 

until further notice. 

The Court also requires additional briefing on whether the two orders complained 

about are appealable orders and thus, not subject to mandamus relief. The Court also 

requests clarification of the need for, and the nature of, the emergency relief requested. 

A response by relator addressing these issues must be filed within 7 days from the date 

of this Order. After the response is filed, the Court will determine whether a response to 

the mandamus or motion for emergency relief will be requested.

PER CURIAM
In re Perkins Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Stay ordered; response requested

Order issued and filed April 28, 2016
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.3

                            CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
                                       OF
              THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                       PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

        Greg H. Weaver and Carl W. Womack hereby certify that:

        1. We are the duly elected and acting Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, respectively, of
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.

        2. The name of the corporation is Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.

        3. The Third Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation were filed
with the Secretary of State of the State of California on April 20, 1993, as
amended by the Certificate of Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Articles
of Incorporation filed with the Secretary of State of California on December 18,
2002.

        4. The first paragraph of Article THIRD of the Third Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation, as corrected, should read
as follows:

                THIRD: The total number of shares of all classes of stock which
        the corporation shall have the authority to issue is 118,906,250 shares,
        consisting of 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, $.01 par value (the
        "Preferred Stock"), and 113,906,250 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par
        value (the "Common Stock"). The Preferred Stock may be issued from time
        to time in one or more series. The Board of Directors is authorized to
        fix the number of shares of any series of Preferred Stock, to determine
        the designation of any series of Preferred Stock and to determine or
        alter the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or
        imposed upon any wholly unissued series of Preferred Stock.

        5. This certificate does not alter the wording of any resolution or
written consent adopted by the board or the shareholders.

        We further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State
of California that the matters set forth in this certificate are true and
correct of our own knowledge.


Dated: February 28, 2003                /s/ Greg H. Weaver
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Greg H. Weaver
                                        Chairman of the Board and
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ Carl W. Womack
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Carl W. Womack
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
NUMBER 13-23-00355-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

HUMBERTO ROSALES CRUZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

 

On appeal from the 389th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

On August 7, 2023, appellant attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction of

attempt to commit murder entered in trial court cause number CR-2827-14-H. We dismiss 

the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

A Sentence in this matter was imposed by jury on December 1, 2014. On August 

8, 2023, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that it appeared the appeal was not 
2

timely perfected. Appellant was advised the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was 

not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the notice. Appellant has failed 

to file a response or otherwise correct the defect.

This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed 

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a 

timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the 

merits of the appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the 

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1998). Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ 

of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the 

availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1999).

Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

GINA M. BENAVIDES

Justice

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

26th day of October, 2023.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2453 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2453

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require hospitals to 
 provide the Secretary with information on the hospital's acquisition 
 costs for 340B drugs and the total revenues received by the hospital 
                            for such drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 27, 2018

 Mr. Grassley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require hospitals to 
 provide the Secretary with information on the hospital's acquisition 
 costs for 340B drugs and the total revenues received by the hospital 
                            for such drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring the Value of the 340B 
Program Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. MEDICARE REQUIREMENT FOR HOSPITALS REGARDING 340B DRUG 
              INFORMATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 1866(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395cc(a)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (X), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (Y), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``, and''; and
            (3) by inserting after subparagraph (Y), the following new 
        subparagraph:
            ``(Z) in the case of a hospital that is a covered entity 
        under subsection (a)(4) of section 340B of the Public Health 
        Service Act, to include in any cost report submitted to the 
        Secretary under this title information on--
                    ``(i) the aggregate acquisition costs of the 
                hospital for drugs acquired during the period covered 
                by such cost report and for which the hospital received 
                a discount under such section 340B; and
                    ``(ii) the aggregate revenues the hospital received 
                from all payors for such drugs, disaggregated by 
                insurance status (including the Medicare program, the 
                Medicaid program, the Children's Health Insurance 
                Program, private health insurance, and uninsured).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to contracts entered into or renewed on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Operations of United Payors &
United Providers, Inc. as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 1996
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      27,838,505
<SECURITIES>                                 4,425,349
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,060,795
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,779,967
<PP&E>                                       2,017,169
<DEPRECIATION>                               (362,607)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,063,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,992,682
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    33,002,542
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,063,224
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,974,611
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,852,003
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,448
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,663,449
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,052,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,611,449
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,611,449
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### GAULT v. STATE.

No. 15243.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 27, 1932.

J. F. Taulbee, of Georgetown, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for robbery j punishment being twenty years in the penitentiary. Emmett Hurst, the party alleged to have been robbed, testified that, under the guise of trying to find some cotton pickers for him, appellant induced him to get into an automobile driven by a boy called “Hot Foot” Jones; that the car was driven several miles into the-country from the city of Taylor, where the car was stopped, and that Jones held a pistol on him (Hurst) while appellant took $35 or $40 out of his pockets. Appellant admitted' having seen Hurst in Taylor and having talked to him, and drunk some intoxicating liquor with him there, but denied the trip to-the country and participation in the robbery. The negro referred to as “Hot Foot” Jones is-shown to have been named Arthur Jones.

Appellant through his counsel requested that Arthur Jones be brought from jail in order that he might be tendered as a witness by appellant in his behalf. Jones was then, being held in jail under .an indictment charging him with the same offense (robbery of Hurst) as that for which appellant was being tried. For that reason counsel for the state-objected to Jones testifying, and the objection was sustained. For some reason counsel for the state withdrew his objection,-but the court adhered to his ruling that Jones could not testify. The bill recites that, if permitted, Jones would have testified that he and one Jay robbed Hurst and that appellant was not present and had nothing to do with it.

The court correctly rejected Jones’ proffered testimony, under article 711, .O. C. P., which is as follows: “Persons charged as-principals, accomplices or accessories, whether in the same or different indictments, cannot be introduced as witnesses for one another, but they may claim a severance; and, if any one or more be acquitted, or the prosecution against them be dismissed, they may testify in behalf of the others.”

Many cases construing the statute in question will be found collated under said article in Vernon’s Ann. Tex. C. C. P. vol. 2, and under section 732, Branch’s Ann. Tex. P. C.

The action of the court in excluding Jones’ testimony was set Tip as a ground for new trial. The affidavit of Jones as to what his testimony would have been was attached to the motion for new trial. Upon the hearing of the motion, the state produced Jones in court, and he testified that the facts contained in his affidavit were false, and said he had been induced by appellant to make the false affidavit. He gave testimony on the motion which connected appellant with the robbery as a principal.

The judgment is affirmed.