alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 99


               Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants



To the Stockholders of
IMC Mortgage Company and Subsidiaries



We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of IMC Mortgage
Company and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 1999, and the related statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the three months then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institution of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and
making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It
is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the expression
of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly,
we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1998, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for the year then ended and in our report dated March 31, 1999, we
expressed an unqualified opinion with an explanatory paragraph for a going
concern on these consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the
information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets
as of December 31, 1998 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation
to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.


/s/ Grant Thornton L.L.P.

Tampa, Florida
May 14, 1999





                                       33
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 6, 2018

No. 04-16-00509-CR

Malcolm GANDY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR6350

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This appeal was originally submitted on briefs on September 6, 2017. However, on 

February 1, 2018, after discovering a portion of the reporter’s record was missing, we withdrew 

the submission date and ordered Maria Fattahi, the court reporter responsible for preparing the 

missing portion of the reporter’s record, to file the record in this court on or before March 5, 

2018. In response to our order, Ms. Fattahi filed a notification of late record, stating appellant 

has not paid the total amount due for preparation of the record. According to the court reporter, 

the total amount due for preparation of the reporter’s record is $738.78, which includes 

preparation of the master index, pretrial motions, and exhibits. In her notification, the court 

reporter further indicated appellant had only paid $609.00. Thus, based on the foregoing, we 

ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before March 15, 2018 that he had

paid the total amount of $738.78 to Ms. Fattahi for preparation of the record. 

As of today, appellant has not responded to our order. On March 22, 2018, the clerk’s 

office of this court attempted to contact counsel by telephone, but could not reach him. Instead, 

a message informing counsel that his response was past due was left with his receptionist. 

We therefore ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before April 

16, 2018 that either (1) the fee for the preparation of the record from the missing portion has 

been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the fee, or (2) appellant is entitled to the 

record without prepayment of the reporter’s fee. See id. TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(b). If appellant 

fails to respond within the time provided, then we will set this case for submission and only 
consider those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record 

for a decision. See id. R. 37.3(c). 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel and the court 

reporter Maria Fattahi. 

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: __________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
Exhibit
      10.21

    AMENDMENT
      TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT

    


    Amendment
      effective as of April 21, 2008 (“Amendment”) to Consulting Agreement dated April
      22, 2005 (“Consulting Agreement”) between Park Avenue Consulting, LLC
      (“Consultant”) and Innopump, Inc. (“Company”).

    


    
      	
              1.

            	
              By
                this Amendment, Innopump and Consultant hereby extend the Term of
                the
                Consulting Agreement from April 21, 2008 through April 21,
                2009.

            


    

    


    
      	
              2.

            	
              In
                consideration of the extension of the Term of the Consulting Agreement
                for
                an additional year and the services to be provided by Consultant
                thereunder, Company shall pay $7,500 to Consultant on the date hereof
                and
                an annual fee of $65,000, payable in four equal consecutive quarterly
                installments of $16,250 during the extended
                Term.

            


    

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have heretofore entered into this
      Amendment.

    


    
      	
              INNOPUMP,
                INC.

            	 	
              PARK
                AVENUE CONSULTING, LLC

            
	 	 	 
	
              By:

            	
              /s/
                Geoffrey Donaldson

            	 	
              By:

            	
              /s/
                Richard Harriton

            
	
              Geoffrey
                Donaldson

              President

            	 	
              Richard
                Harriton

              Member
WWW.EXFILE.COM, INC. -- 888-775-4789 -- PERFORMANCE HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. -- EXHIBIT 10.133 TO FORM 10-Q


     

    EXHIBIT
10.133


    

    


    


    


    Dear
Holders of Promissory Notes dated _______________:

    


    The Company is requesting your consent
to an amendment of the maturity date of the above-referenced outstanding
promissory note issued by the Company and held by you which has a maturity date
of _______________, 2008 (the “Current Maturity Date”) to a new maturity date of
December 31, 2008 (the “New Maturity Date”) and waiver of any event of default
relating to the non-payment of such note as of _______________, 2008 (the
“Waiver”).

    


    Toward that end, we ask that you
complete, sign and return this letter as soon as possible.

    


    Please take a moment to sign and return
your consent by facsimile to 609-656-0869.

    


    


     

    
      	As of
      _______________, 2008 	Very truly yours,
      

              


              Dominique
      Prunetti Miller

              


              Dominique
      Prunetti Miller

              Secretary 

            


    

     

                                                                                                               

    


    


    The New
Maturity Date and Waiver is accepted

    and
agreed by the undersigned noteholder:

    


    


    By:________________________________

    Name:

    Date:

    


    


    
      427 River
View Plaza

      Trenton,
New Jersey 08611

      Phone
609-656-0181

      Fax
609-656-0869
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




4th Amendment to Lease Agreement— 70 Carlson Road




This Amendment to Lease is entered into by 100 Carlson Road LLC (“Landlord”), 100 Carlson
Road, Rochester, New York 14610 and Harris Interactive Inc. (“Tenant”), 60 Corporate Woods,
Rochester, New York 14623.



WITNESSETH




Whereas, Landlord and Tenant entered into that certain Lease Agreement dated July 1, 1998;
1st Amendment to Lease dated July 1, 1999; 2nd Amendment to Lease
dated August 2, 1999; 3rd Amendment to Lease dated March 20, 2003 (“Lease
Agreement”).



NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:




	1.	 	Current Lease: The parties agree that the current Lease Agreement is
effective through October 31, 2008. The current rent is Two Hundred Forty-Four
Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty Dollars ($244,920.00) annually, payable Twenty Thousand
Four Hundred Ten Dollars ($20,410.00) monthly.






	2.	 	Lease Extension: The parties further agree that the term of the Lease
Agreement is hereby extended from November 1, 2008 through October 31, 2011. The rent
effective November 1, 2008 shall be Three Hundred Four Thousand One Hundred Dollars
($304,100.00) annually, payable Twenty Five Thousand Three Hundred Forty-One and 67/100
Dollars ($25,341.67) monthly.






	3.	 	Lease Extension Option: The tenant reserves the option to extend the
Lease Agreement for an additional three (3) years and eight (8) months from November 1,
2011 through June 30, 2015 by written notice rendered to Landlord at the above address
at least two hundred seventy (270) days prior to the expiration of the then current
lease term on October 31, 2011.






	4.	 	Option Term Rent: The rent for the Lease Extension Option Term
effective from November 1, 2011 through June 30, 2015 shall be Three Hundred Fifteen
Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($315,600.00) annually, payable Twenty Six Thousand Three
Hundred Dollars ($26,300.00) monthly, fully net.






	3.	 	Conditions: All other terms and conditions of the Lease Agreement
shall remain the same.





Dated this 23rd day of September, 2008



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	LANDLORD	 	 
	 	 	100 Carlson Road LLC	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By
	 	/s/ Elliott Landsman
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Printed Name Elliott Landsman	 	 






 









 





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	TENANT	 	 
	 	 	Harris Interactive Inc.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By
	 	/s/ Ronald E. Salluzzo
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Printed Name Ronald E. Salluzzo	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By
	 	/s/ Gregory T. Novak	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Printed Name Gregory T. Novak	 	 







2
#### WALLACE v. STATE.

No. 20045.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 21, 1938.

P. P.’ Woodard and Stanley Timmins, both of Marshall, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is murder;- the punishment, confinement in- the penitentiary for eight years.

It was charged in the indictment, in substance, that appellant, with malice afore-' thought, killed Ben Fields by shooting him with a gun.

Two or’three hours before the homicide appellant and deceased had a difficulty in which deceased struck' appellant on the head with a bottle. After the parties had been separated appellant left the scene, and, according to the testimony of the state, secured a pistol. He then went to deceased and shot him down. ■

.Appellant testified that deceased was attacking him when he fired the fatal shot.

The only bill of exception in the record complains of the argument of counsel for the state. Suffice it to say that the argument appears to have been proper.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit 24
 
 Confirming Statement
 
 This statement confirms that the undersigned, Kimberly J. Ellington, has authorized and designated Jennifer Mainord or Rhonda Bost, to execute and file on the undersigned’s behalf, all Forms 3, 4, and 5 (including any amendments thereto) that the undersigned may be required to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a result of the undersigned’s ownership of or transactions in securities of First Merchants Corporation. The authority of Jennifer Mainord or Rhonda Bost under this statement shall continue until the undersigned is no longer required to file Forms 3, 4 and 5 with regard to the undersigned’s ownership of or transactions in securities of First Merchants
Corporation, unless earlier in writing. The undersigned acknowledges Jennifer Mainord or Rhonda Bost are not assuming any of the undersigned’s responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
 Date:  09/10/2012
 
 /s/ Kimberly J. Ellington
 Signature
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with
the quarterly report of Netopia, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Charles Constanti, as Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | i. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



By:

/s/ Charles ConstantiCharles Constanti Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) Date: August 9, 2006
EXHIBIT
31.1 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION I, Yuri Benenson, certify
 that:1.
I have reviewed this
 quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Trimol Group, Inc.2.
Based on my knowledge,
 this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
 fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
 in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
 misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the
 financial statements, and other financial information included in this
 quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
 condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
 for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
The registrants other
 certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
 disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14
 and 15d-14) for the registrant, and we have:a)
designed such disclosure
 controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the
 registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
 others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
 quarterly report is being prepared;b)
evaluated the
 effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a
 date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
 Evaluation Date); andc)
presented in this
 quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
 controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5.
The registrants other
 certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
 evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
 registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
 function):a)
all significant
 deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
 adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
 report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any
 material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
any fraud, whether or not
 material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
 role in the registrants internal controls; and6.
The registrants other
 certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or
 not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
 that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
 our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
 significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  August 14, 2007
By /s/ Yuri BenensonChief Executive Officer 22
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2604 

To amend the Oil Region National Heritage Area Act to reauthorize the 

Oil Region National Heritage Area, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2018 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Oil Region National Heritage Area Act to 

reauthorize the Oil Region National Heritage Area, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Oil Region National 

5 Heritage Area Reauthorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OIL REGION NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA ACT. 

7 (a) MANAGEMENT ENTITY.—The Oil Region Na8 tional Heritage Area Act (Public Law 108–447; 118 Stat. 

9 3368) is amended by striking ‘‘Oil Heritage Region, Inc.’’ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2604 IS

1 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘Oil Region Alliance 

2 of Business, Industry and Tourism’’. 

3 (b) SUNSET.—Section 608 of the Oil Region National 

4 Heritage Area Act (Public Law 108–447; 118 Stat. 3372) 

5 is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 608. SUNSET. 

7 ‘‘The authority of the Secretary to grant or provide 

8 any assistance under this title shall terminate on Sep9 tember 30, 2026.’’. 

10 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

11 612(a)(2) of the Oil Region National Heritage Area Act 

12 (Public Law 108–447; 118 Stat. 3373) is amended by 

13 striking ‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$20,000,000’’. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Kelley’s Estate

(No. 2).

Argued March 8, 1916.

Appeal, No. 32, Jan. T., 1916, by M. Frank Coolbaugh, Administrator of the Estate in Pennsylvania of Edward W. Kelley, Deceased, from decree of O. C. Monroe Co., decreeing the termination of a trust, in Estate of John G. Kelley, Deceased.

Before Brown, C. J., Stewart, Moschzisker, Frazer and Walling, JJ.

Affirmed.

Petition for the termination of a trust. Before Staples, P. J.

The facts appear in Kelley’s Estate (No. 1), 253 Pa. 466.

The court awarded the relief prayed for, and ascertained the interest which had accrued on the fund. M. Frank Coolbaugh, Administrator of the Estate in Pennsylvania of Edward W. Kelley, deceased, appealed.

*Error assigned,*among others, was the decree of the court.

*Wilton A. Erdman,*for appellant.

*A. Mitchell Palmer,*with him *O. Raymond Bensinger,*for appellee.

May 1, 1916 :

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stewart,

In the opinion just handed down in the case of the appeal of Edith S. Kelley, executrix of the will of John G. Kelley, deceased, to No. 16, January, 1916, it is held that the legal representative of E. W. Kelley has no claim upon the fund in court. The present appeal by the administrator complains that the allowance of interest was insufficient. Inasmuch as it has been decided that the representative is without standing, this appeal must be dismissed and it is accordingly so ordered.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICT Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Brennan, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



May 9, 2007



/S/    JOHN J.
BRENNANJohn J. BrennanChairman, President andChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Sunrise Energy Resources, Inc. a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), Konstantin Tsiryulnikov, Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Sunrise Energy Resources, Inc., and will be retained by Sunrise Energy
Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.




Date:
      March 26, 2010By:
              /s/ Konstantin
      TsiryulnikovKonstantin
      TsiryulnikovChief
      Executive Officer
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

ROCKY MOUNTAIN AIRWAYS, INC. 

FAA DOCKET CP89NM0483 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS 

SERVED APR 2 4 1990 

On April 13 , 1990, the United States Court o f Appeals f or the 

District of Columbia Circuit held that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Rules of Practice for FAA Civil Penalty Actions 

(Civil Penalty Rules), 14 C.F.R. Part 13, (including Subpart G) , 

promulgated by 53 Federal Register 34646 (Sept. 7, 1988), are 

invalid, because the FAA failed to comply with notice and comment 

requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 u.s.c. § 553. 

Air Transport Association of America v. Department of Transportation, No. 89 -1 195, slip op. at 2, 3 (D.C. Cir. April 13, 1990). The 

Court ruled that the FAA may hold pending civil penalty actions in 

abeyance and resume prosecution upon the promulgation of a scheme 

for adjudicating administrative civil penalty actions. Id. at 21. 

Accordingly, the above-captioned proceeding is stayed until further 

notice. 

Dated: April 23, 1990 

Q,. Ronnie A. Yoder Q~~~ Administrative Law Ju e