alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
4.12

     

     

     

    
      RESOLUTIONS
OF THE SOLE

      DIRECTOR
OF "GEO GENESIS GROUP, LTD."

      ADOPTED
ON THE 26th
 JULY 2007 AT 10:00 AM

      
        
          

        

      

       

       

       

       

      
        
          	PRESENT:	 	 	 
	SPYRIDON
      VLASPOULOS	 	-Sole
      Director	 


        

         

      

    

    The
following resolutions were adopted on the 26th July
2007. More particularly:

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              A.
      The Company hereby establishes the first year option plan for Directors,
      Executive Committee Members, other key Executives and Strategic
      Affiliates.

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              B.
      The Company hereby allocates and shall Issue common stock options totaling
      to 20% of all its issued and outstanding shares, upon the completion of
      the acquisition of the company styled "GEO GENESIS GROUP, INC" of
      Delaware, USA,

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              C.
      The aforementioned 20% common shares options ate finther allocated as
      follows:

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              1.
      15% of all the options are granted prO rata to the Directors of the
      Company post acquisition of the company styled "0E0 GENESIS GROUP, INC,"
      of Delaware, USA.

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              2.
      20% of all the options are granted to the Executives of the wholly owned
      subsidiary Chinese company styled "QINGDAO CHINA PARTNERS INVESTMENT
      ADVISORY

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              3.
      50% of all the options are granted equally amongst the mettibers of the
      Executive Committee of the Company, namely Messrs ROGER BENDELAC,
      ANASTASIO CARAYANNIS and PHILIP ROGER HOWARD
      CONNOR III.

            
	 	4.
      15% of all the options are reserved for strategic affiliates and other
      potential key executives by the Company's Directors and its Executive
      Committee.


    

     

     

    IN WITNESS THEREOF these Resolutions are signed
as follows:

     

     

     

     

      
        

      

    

    SPYRIDON
VLASPOULOS

    Sole
Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,974
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,116
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,930)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         153,206
<DEPRECIATION>                                (73,704)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         30,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,270
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,140
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,174
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (75)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,445
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,445
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,445
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ADDvantage Technologies Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year
        ended September 30, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) I, Scott A. Francis, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
            The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Scott A. Francis
 Name:  Scott A. Francis
 Title:  Chief Financial Officer
 Date:  December 28, 2018
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2069 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to clarify the requirements 

for meeting the definition of the term ‘‘employee’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2017 

Mr. BROWN (for himself, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. 

MERKLEY, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. SANDERS, Ms. BALDWIN, and Mr. BOOKER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to clarify the 

requirements for meeting the definition of the term ‘‘employee’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Workers’ 

5 Freedom to Organize Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS UNDER THE NATIONAL LABOR RELA7 TIONS ACT. 

8 Section 2 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

9 U.S.C. 152) is amended— 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2069 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the 

2 following: ‘‘An individual performing any service 

3 shall be considered an employee (except as provided 

4 in the previous sentence) and not an independent 

5 contractor, unless— 

6 ‘‘(A) the individual is free from control and 

7 direction in connection with the performance of 

8 the service, both under the contract for the per9 formance of the service and in fact; 

10 ‘‘(B) the service is performed outside the 

11 usual course of the business of the employer; 

12 and 

13 ‘‘(C) the individual is customarily engaged 

14 in an independently established trade, occupa15 tion, profession, or business of the same nature 

16 as that involved in the service performed.’’; and 

17 (2) in paragraph (11)— 

18 (A) by inserting ‘‘and for a majority of the 

19 individual’s work time’’ after ‘‘interest of the 

20 employer’’; 

21 (B) by striking ‘‘assign,’’ after ‘‘dis22 charge,’’; and 

23 (C) by striking ‘‘or responsibly to direct 

24 them,’’ after ‘‘or discipline other employees,’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,921
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,897
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           7,155
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,393
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,964
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,019
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,041
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,256
<INCOME-TAX>                                       902
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,354
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,354
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 15, 2023

No. 04

- 23

- 00049

- CR

IN RE Miguel Angel NAVARRO MOJICA

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

On January 30, 2023, r elator filed a motion to dismiss his petition for writ of mandamus

. We GRANT the motion and DISMISS the petition for writ of mandamus . The stay imposed on

January 13, 2023 is LIFTED

.

It is so ORDERED on February 15, 2023

.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of February, 2023

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 Thi s proceeding arises out of Cause No. 13058CR , styled State of Texas v. Miguel Angel Navarro Mojica , pending

in the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Todd Alexander Blomerth presiding.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERDUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC.**

 

I, Marshall C. Turner, Chief Executive Officer of DuPont Photomasks,Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter endedDecember 31, 2004, as filed with theUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission, do hereby certify that to myknowledge:

 

1.     TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company in respect ofthose items required to be described or presented in such Report under Section13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 
| /s/ MARSHALL C. TURNER  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Marshall C. Turner      |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

Date: February 8, 2005

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toDuPont Photomasks, Inc. and will be retained by DuPont Photomasks, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

I, Satish Rishi, ChiefFinancial Officer of DuPont Photomasks, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, in connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q(the “Report”) for the quarter ended December31, 2004, as filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission, do hereby certify that to my knowledge:

 

1.     TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company in respect ofthose items required to be described or presented in such Report under Section13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 
| /s/ SATISH RISHI        |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Satish Rishi            |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

Date: February 8, 2005

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toDuPont Photomasks, Inc. and will be retained by DuPont Photomasks, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                       VALUE CITY DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.

                              List of Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     Ref.                                                    State of         Parent Co.   Parent Pct.
     No.                     Name                          Incorporation       Ref. No.    Ownership
     ----  -------------------------------------------     -------------       --------    -----------
<S>        <C>                                             <C>                 <C>          <C>
       1.  Value City Department Stores, Inc.                  Ohio                            Parent
       2.  Carlyn Advertising Agency, Inc.                     Ohio               1.           100.0%
       3.  J. S. Overland Delivery, Inc.                     Delaware             1.           100.0%
       4.  Shonac Corporation                                  Ohio               1.           100.0%
       5.  Value City of Michigan, Inc.                      Michigan             1.           100.0%
       6.  Westerville Road LP, Inc.                         Delaware             1.           100.0%
       7.  Westerville Road GP, Inc.                         Delaware             1.           100.0%
       8.  Value City Acquisition Corp.                      Delaware             1.           100.0%
       9.  VC Acquisition, Inc.                                Ohio               1.           100.0%
      10.  Filene's Basement, Inc.(a)                        Delaware             1.           100.0%
      11.  Gramex Retail Stores, Inc.                        Delaware             1.           100.0%
      12.  DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc.                          Missouri             4.           100.0%
      13.  GB Retailers, Inc.                                Delaware             5.           100.0%
      14.  Value City Department Stores Services, Inc.       Delaware             5.           100.0%
      15.  Value City Limited Partnership                     Ohio(b)             6.            99.0%
                                                                                  7.             1.0%
      16.  VCM, Ltd.                                         Ohio LLC            13.           100.0%
      17.  L. F. Widmann, Inc.                             Pennsylvania          16.           100.0%
</TABLE>

           ---------------------------------------------------------------------
           Notes:

           (a) Formerly known as Base Acquisition Corp.

           (b) This is a limited partnership, not an incorporated entity.



                                      E-20
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 177 (Thursday, September 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 74204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20670]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-20-2024]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 38; Authorization of Production 
Activity; BMW Manufacturing Co. LLC; (Passenger Motor Vehicles); 
Spartanburg, South Carolina

    On May 10, 2024, BMW Manufacturing Company, LLC submitted a 
notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its 
facility within Subzone 38A, in Spartanburg, South Carolina.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (89 FR 42423-42424, May 15, 2024). On 
September 9, 2024, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this 
time. The production activity described in the notification was 
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, 
including section 400.14.

    Dated: September 9, 2024.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-20670 Filed 9-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report
on Form 10-Q of Boston Communications Group, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, E.Y. Snowden,
President and Chief Executive Officer, and Karen A. Walker, Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2003 |  | 
|                        |  | 
|                        |  | 



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2003 |  | 
|                        |  | 
|                        |  | 



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Boston Communications Group, Inc., and will be retained by Boston Communications Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### LOGGINS v. STATE.

No. 20103.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 25, 1939.

Rehearing Denied March 8, 1939.

P. L. Corssley, of Eastland, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for theft of an automobile; punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for life.

The indictment, which we deem sufficient, charges that appellant had theretofore on two occasions been convicted of a felony less than capital. Consequently the punishment which he received was authorized by art. 63, P.C. See also Arnold v. State, 127 Tex.Cr.R. 89, 74 S.W.2d 997; Belton v. State, 130 Tex.Cr.R. 7, 91 S.W. 2d 728.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. Hence no question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

' The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant files a motion herein complaining of the overruling of his motion for a continuance. We find no such motion in the record, and .we gather therefrom that same was an oral motion. Of course we have no way of reviewing such a motion. He complains also because of the fact that he was tried without benefit of counsel, and that he was friendless and alone. These matters are presented only in his motion. It is not incumbent on the trial court to furnish counsel to one charged with a felony less than capital. Art. 494, C.C.P.

We see no reason for a further review of this case. In the absence of a statement of facts, we are unable to review the same.

The motion will be overruled.
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as  amended

CERTIFICATION

I,
James A.D. Smith, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Genelabs Technologies, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



|Date: March 11, 2005 |  | /s/JAMES A.D. SMITHJames A.D. Smith
President and Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian Kirkland, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), rendered July 12, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.