alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form of Waiver



 Exhibit 10.2 
 FORM OF WAIVER 
 In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s
participation in the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or benefits that are required to
comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008. 
 I
acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called “golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer
or in which I participate as they relate to the period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the TARP Capital Purchase Program. 
 This waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned
regulation, including without limitation a claim for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these
regulations on my employment relationship. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto signed my name this      day of
November, 2008. 
  

	
	  

	Name:
! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 !
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 "
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 #
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 $
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 %
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 &
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 '
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 (
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 )
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 !
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 "
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 #
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 $
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 %
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 &
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 '
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 (
 ! " # % &' ( & )' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3 , # 3 ! )
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIDDK RC2 Review.                    

*Date:*                         October 29, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Elena Sanovich, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Rm. 7351, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-8886,                         *sanoviche@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 10, 2024.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-20958 Filed 9-13-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                              SILICON GAMING, INC.
 
             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED    NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                        SEPTEMBER 30,        SEPTEMBER 30,
                                       1997       1996       1997       1996
                                     ---------  ---------  ---------  --------
<S>                                  <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Net loss............................ $  (6,344) $  (3,705) $ (16,943) $ (9,688)
                                     =========  =========  =========  ========
Weighted average common shares
 outstanding........................    11,649      8,272     11,133     5,038
Weighted average preferred shares
 outstanding, as if converted.......       --         226        --        528
Common shares, redeemable
 convertible preferred shares and
 options and warrants to purchase
 shares of common and redeemable
 convertible preferred shares
 granted (using the treasury stock
 method assuming an initial public
 offering price of $10.50) since
 July 31, 1995 included pursuant to
 Securities and Exchange Commission
 Rules..............................       --       2,012        --      4,255
                                     ---------  ---------  ---------  --------
  Weighted average common and
   equivalent shares................    11,649     10,510     11,133     9,821
                                     =========  =========  =========  ========
  Net loss per share................ $   (0.54) $   (0.35) $  (01.52) $  (0.99)
                                     =========  =========  =========  ========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                        
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Dated: August 11, 2004 |  | /s/ JOHN M. PALUMBO                    
|                       |  | John M. Palumbo Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                              99
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,572
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,400
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             5,286
<LOANS>                                         24,760
<ALLOWANCE>                                          6
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,675
<DEPOSITS>                                      26,515
<SHORT-TERM>                                        71
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                687
<LONG-TERM>                                        737
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           463
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  34,675
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    485
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   90
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    31
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   605
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 379
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 390
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              215
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        6
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    369
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (146)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        (99)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (99)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.66
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   111
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  117
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               117
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01


                      CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No.'s 333-30083, 333-5769, 33-85914, 33-81894, 333-4806 and 33-52250)
pertaining to the 1991 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1995 Stock Option Plan,
the 1994 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Based Compensation Program, the 1985
Employee Stock Option Plan and the 1991 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1992
Restricted Stock Award Plan, and the 1987 Directors Stock Option Plan of
Genelabs Technologies, Inc. of our report dated February 10, 1999, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Genelabs Technologies, Inc. included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.

                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 26, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2320 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2320

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the national 
  limitation amount for qualified highway or surface freight transfer 
                            facility bonds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 18, 2018

Mr. Cornyn (for himself and Mr. Warner) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the national 
  limitation amount for qualified highway or surface freight transfer 
                            facility bonds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Building United States 
Infrastructure and Leveraging Development Act'' or the ``BUILD Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE NATIONAL LIMITATION AMOUNT FOR QUALIFIED HIGHWAY OR 
              SURFACE FREIGHT TRANSFER FACILITY BONDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 142(m)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``$15,000,000,000'' and inserting 
``$20,800,000,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to bonds issued after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             357                     615
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,658                  14,719
<ALLOWANCES>                                       513                     620
<INVENTORY>                                     16,406                  14,426
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,722                  36,314
<PP&E>                                           7,326                   6,245
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,819                   3,279
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,361                  74,125
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,765                  17,027
<BONDS>                                         29,984                  23,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            81                      81
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,664                  24,821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,361                  74,125
<SALES>                                         69,888                  63,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,382                  67,043
<CGS>                                           38,813                  35,794
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,813                  35,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   440                     392
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,763                   2,795
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,953                   2,471
<INCOME-TAX>                                       110                     100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,843                   2,371
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                 (1,900)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,843                     471
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35                    0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33                    0.06


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1229

KENNETH JOHNSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CLIFTON J. GORDY , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. George L. Russell, III , District Judge. ( 1:20

- cv
- 00112

- GLR )

Submitted : August 20 , 2020 Decided: August 24, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN , and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Kenneth Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismis sing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court

. Johnson v. Gordy , No. 1:20

- cv
- 00112

- GLR (D. Md. Feb. 4, 2020)

. We deny Johnson’s motion to remand

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-11362 c/w No. 98-51167 Conference Calendar

KEITH RUSSELL JUDD, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GEORGE E. KILLINGER, Warden; JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney General; STEPHEN FRENCH; KAREN Y. COREY-STEELE; L. STUART PLATT; JOE CONNELLY, Ector County District Judge; MARK ROOMBERG, Respondents-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-98-CV-134

-------------------- December 16, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Keith Russell Judd has appealed pro se in Nos. 98-11362 and No. 98-51167. Because of the overlapping nature of these appeals, they are consolidated. In No. 98-11362, Judd challenges an interlocutory order of the magistrate judge transferring his action to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. We lack jurisdiction to review such an order.
See Trufant v. Autocon, Inc. , 729 F.2d 308, 309 (5th Cir. 1984);No. 98-11362 c/w

No. 98-51167 -2- Enplanar, Inc. v. Marsh , 11 F.3d 1284, 1298 (5th Cir. 1994). No. 98-51167 concerns the district court’s denial, without prejudice, of Judd’s motion for immediate release pending trial. Because Judd has now been convicted and sentenced, this issue is moot. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals. All pending motions are denied as moot. Judd is warned that future frivolous filings in this court will invite the imposition of severe sanctions.
APPEALS DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED AS MOOT; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7525

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY WAYNE MANGUM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, 

Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:06-cr-00058-NCT-1; 1:09-cv00817-NCT-PTS)

Submitted: April 27, 2012 Decided: May 8, 2012

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Wayne Mangum, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Wayne Mangum seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Mangum has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ex10-44.htm


    Exhibit
10.44

    ASSIGNMENT OF MEMBERSHIP
INTEREST AND PERCENTAGE

    


    For and in consideration of the payment
of Two Hundred Five Thousand
($205,000.00) Dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned CHESAPEAKE CUSTOM HOMES, L.L.C., a
Maryland limited liability company ("Assignor") does hereby sell,
assign, transfer and convey to OLD LINE BANCSHARES, INC., a Maryland
corporation ("Assignee"), its successors and
assigns, all of Assignor's right, title and interest to a twelve and one-half
percent (12.5%) Membership Interest (as defined in the Company's Operating
Agreement, as amended) and Percentage of Membership Interest (as defined in the
Company's Operating Agreement, as amended) in Pointer Ridge Office Investment,
LLC, a Maryland limited liability company (the "Company").

    In Witness Whereof, the
undersigned has hereunto set his hand

    and seal
this 1st  day of
November, 2008.

    


    WITNESS:

    


    
      	 
      	 
      	
              CHESAPEAKE
      CUSTOM HOMES

            
	 
      	 
      	
              L.L.C.,
      a Maryland limited liability

            
	 
      	 
      	
              company

            
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              Katie Stewart                                                                     
      

            	 
      	
              By:
      Greg S.
      Wilby                (SEAL)

            
	 
      	 
      	
              Greg
      S. Wilby, General Manager