alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,940
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,718
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,545
<PP&E>                                          42,958
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,522
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,750
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,243)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,340
<SALES>                                         22,116
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,116
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,770
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   442
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 860
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    106
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                106
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       106
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Re-Proposed Mandatory GHG Reporting R

May 19, 2010

Laura Mendicino

Freescale Semiconductor
Overview of SIA’s C

 Gas Consumption Tracking Burden and Cost of Apportioning Gas Consumpt

Separate Process Categories

 Uncertainty Analysis Does not Support Using Nin

Process Categories over Tier 2(b) Emission Fact

 POU Abatement Characterization and Tracking 

Requirements vs. Default DRE of 60% 

 Underestimated Compliance Costs Information on Gas Emissions for Separate Proc

Categories is Highly-Sensitive
Gas Consumptio

 Adoption of Cylinder-Specific Heel Factors is an 

improvement, but Re-proposal has additional buassociated with operational tracking

• Inventory• 1% trigger recalculation• 20% trigger deviation for cylinders• 1% full-scale accuracy of instrumentation• “Calibration” of instrumentation required
Burden and Cost of Apportio

Consumption to Separate Process C

 Tremendous burden and cost to apportion Nine Process Categories (3 CVD, 4 etch, 2 clean Requirement for Quantifiable Indicators of gas us Most PFC gas usage is in CVD chamber clean

• Tier 2(b) does distinguish in-situ vs. remote N

 Complexity in etch by film categories
Uncertainty Analysis Does not Support 

Process Categories over Tier 2(b) Emiss

 Only one sample of gas usage distribution used

• Remote NF3 was only CVD usage

 Underestimated relative error used in analysis Validity of claim that 9 categories reduces uncerta

by 50% over Tier 2(b)

• Clear acknowledgement that most of uncertain

reduction attributed to remote NF3

 Relative errors for chamber clean emission factor

been greatly reduced – but factors have not chan(Tier 2b)
POU Abatement Characterization and 

Requirements vs. Default DR

 Tier 2b default DREs cannot be used Supplier-provided DREs cannot be used (?) RSASTP – 20% of units tested each year DRE must be measured using EPA Protocol Specific requirements to allow for DRE

• Certification to manufacturer specifications & • Uptime

 EPA 60% default unreasonably low
Underestimated Complian

 EPA estimate of $31K per facility ($2.55M total)

• Labor alone estimated to be 5X + 

 No associated capital or O&M costs

• Estimated total $50M + 

 POU Abatement testing cost > 4.4 X the EPA es
Information on Gas Emissions for 

Process Categories is Highly

 GHG usage and emissions by process is highly sensit

• Provides specific knowledge of proprietary device d

and manufacturing processes 

 By requiring emissions reporting on nine separate proc

categories, the Re-Proposed Rule would require discloof even more detailed and sensitive information than toriginally proposed Rule.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

AXEL BRAUN PRODUCTIONS,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 11-56 (EGS/JMF)

DOES 1-2,823,

Defendants.

ORDER

On June 28, 2011, this Court stated that “[a]ny party seeking to proceed anonymously

must comply with the Local Rules [LCvR 5.1(e)] by including his name and full residence

address in his filing and must indicate on the first page of his filing that he wishes to file

UNDER SEAL.” Order [#11] at 1.

Upon further consideration, however, this Court has now concluded that, as internet

subscribers, these individuals have no expectation of privacy in their subscriber information. 

See U.S. v. Christie, 624 F.3d 558, 573 (3rd Cir. 2010) (“Federal courts have uniformly held that

‘subscriber information provided to an internet provider is not protected by the Fourth

Amendment’s privacy expectation’ because it is voluntarily conveyed to third parties.”) (internal

quotation omitted); Guest v. Leis, 255 F.3d 325, 335 (6th Cir. 2001) (“Individuals generally lose

a reasonable expectation of privacy in their [subscriber] information once they reveal it to third

parties.”); Achte/Neunte Boll Kino Beteiligungs Gmbh & Co. v. Does 1-4,577, 736 F. Supp. 2d

212, 216 (D.D.C. 2010) (“With regard to [the movant’s] assertion that the information sought is

‘personal,’ courts have held that Internet subscribers do not have an expectation of privacy in
their subscriber information as they already have conveyed such information to the Internet

Service Providers.”).

Thus, any Doe defendant who seeks to file a motion in this case must do so publically on

the docket. Any motion that fails to include the movant’s name and full residence address will

not be accepted for filing. All motions that comply with the Local Rules will be accepted for

filing and will be made part of the public docket.

Finally, it is, hereby,

ORDERED that, within five (5) days of the date of this Order, plaintiff forward a copy

of the Order to all primary or intermediary Internet Service Providers that have or will be served

with Rule 45 subpoenas in this case. It is further, hereby,

ORDERED that all primary or intermediary Internet Service Providers that have or will

be served with Rule 45 subpoenas in this case will, within five (5) days or receiving this Order

from plaintiff, forward a copy of the Order to all subscribers identified by plaintiff as putative

infringers of its motion picture copyright.

SO ORDERED.

_____________________________

JOHN M. FACCIOLA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM THE NUTRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
               FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,
               1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
               TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                           <C>            
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS          
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0                    
<INVENTORY>                                 0     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            0     
<PP&E>                                      0     
<DEPRECIATION>                              0     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              0     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0     
<BONDS>                                     0     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0     
<PREFERRED>                                 0     
<COMMON>                               87,592     
<OTHER-SE>                           (76,351)     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                0     
<SALES>                                     0     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            0     
<CGS>                                       0     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             0
<INCOME-TAX>                                0     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0     
<DISCONTINUED>                              0     
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0     
<NET-INCOME>                                0     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             .00     
<EPS-DILUTED>                             .00
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2022 ND 5

Raynard Leroy Lebeau, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20210221

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, 

the Honorable Steven L. Marquart, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellant.

Renata J. Olafson Selzer, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for respondent 

and appellee.

FILED 

IN THE OFFICE OF THE 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

JANUARY 6, 2022 

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1

Lebeau v. State

No. 20210221

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Raynard Leroy Lebeau appeals from an order of the district court 

summarily dismissing his second application for postconviction relief. Lebeau 

argues the district court erred in dismissing his application because he 

received ineffective assistance of counsel in the underlying criminal matter. 

Because Lebeau’s claims are barred by res judicata under N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-

12, and Lebeau failed to raise any genuine issue of material fact in response to 

the State’s motion for summary dismissal, we summarily affirm under 

N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7); See Atkins v. State, 2021 ND 112, 961 N.W.2d 

278 (summarily affirming denial of an application for postconviction relief 

under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7) where the claims were barred by res 

judicata and the petitioner failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 31499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12783]

[[Page 31499]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52 and Part 70

[EPA-R02-OAR-2012-0032, FRL-9675-1]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Operating 
Permits Program; Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; Administrative Changes

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to an adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing the direct final 
rule, published on March 22, 2012, that approved revisions to the 
Puerto Rico Regulations for the Control of Atmospheric Pollution. Those 
revisions were submitted to EPA by the Puerto Rico Environmental 
Quality Board on July 13, 2011, and consist of amendments to Rules 102, 
111, 115, 116 and Appendix A. Generally the revisions to the 
regulations involve administrative changes which improve the clarity of 
the rules contained in the Commonwealth's Implementation Plan and 
Operating Permits Program.

DATES: The direct final rule is withdrawn as of May 29, 2012.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R02-OAR-2012-0032 for 
this action. Copies of the state submittal(s) are available at the 
following address for inspection during normal business hours: 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, Air Programs Branch, 
290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kirk J. Wieber, Air Programs Branch, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, 
New York 10007-1866, (212) 637-3381.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the direct final rule published at 77 FR 
16676, EPA stated that if we received adverse comments by April 23, 
2012, the rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. EPA subsequently 
received an adverse comment. EPA will address the comment received in a 
subsequent final action based upon the proposed action also published 
on March 22, 2012 (77 FR 16795). EPA will not institute a second 
comment period on this action.

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

40 CFR Part 70

    Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, 
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: May 9, 2012.
Judith A. Enck,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2012-12783 Filed 5-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2553 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2553

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit health 
 plans and pharmacy benefit managers from restricting pharmacies from 
   informing individuals regarding the prices for certain drugs and 
                              biologicals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Know the Lowest Price Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LIMITING CERTAIN INFORMATION ON DRUG PRICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1860D-4 of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395w-104) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(m) Prohibition on Limiting Certain Information on Drug Prices.--
A PDP sponsor and a Medicare Advantage organization shall ensure that 
each prescription drug plan or MA-PD plan offered by the sponsor or 
organization does not restrict a pharmacy that dispenses a prescription 
drug or biological from informing, nor penalize such pharmacy for 
informing, an enrollee in such plan of any differential between the 
negotiated price of, or copayment or coinsurance for, the drug or 
biological to the enrollee under the plan and a lower price the 
individual would pay for the drug or biological if the enrollee 
obtained the drug without using any health insurance coverage.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2020.

            Passed the Senate September 4, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2553

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit health 
 plans and pharmacy benefit managers from restricting pharmacies from 
   informing individuals regarding the prices for certain drugs and 
                              biologicals.
```
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 249 

To provide that the pueblo of Santa Clara may lease for 99 years certain 

restricted land, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2017 

Mr. UDALL (for himself and Mr. HEINRICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide that the pueblo of Santa Clara may lease for 

99 years certain restricted land, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF PUEBLO OF SANTA CLARA 

4 LAND ELIGIBLE FOR 99-YEAR LEASE. 

5 Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of Au6 gust 9, 1955 (commonly known as the ‘‘Long-Term Leas7 ing Act’’) (25 U.S.C. 415(a)), is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘Indians,,’’ and inserting ‘‘Indi9 ans,’’; 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 249 IS

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘Ohkay Owingeh pueblo,’’ after 

2 ‘‘Cochiti,’’; 

3 (3) by inserting ‘‘the pueblo of Santa Clara,’’ 

4 after ‘‘Pojoaque,’’; 

5 (4) by striking ‘‘the the lands’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘the land’’; 

7 (5) by striking ‘‘lands held in trust for the 

8 Pueblo of Santa Clara,’’; and 

9 (6) by striking ‘‘lands held in trust for Ohkay 

10 Owingeh Pueblo’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C Section 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Guardian Technologies International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Michael W. Trudnak, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the reporting requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 29, 2007

Signed: /s/ Michael W. Trudnak

Name:

Michael W. Trudnak

Title:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2438 

To conduct or support further comprehensive research for the creation of 

a universal influenza vaccine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2018 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. NELSON, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. KING, and Ms. SMITH) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To conduct or support further comprehensive research for 

the creation of a universal influenza vaccine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flu Vaccine Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. RESEARCH FOR THE CREATION OF A UNIVERSAL 

6 INFLUENZA VACCINE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the National In8 stitute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases shall conduct or 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2438 IS

1 support comprehensive research for the creation of a uni2 versal influenza vaccine. 

3 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—To carry 

4 out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated 

5 $200,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM KARRINGTON
HEALTH, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,873,590
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,214,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,741,826
<PP&E>                                     116,999,424
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,240,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             139,125,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,929,901
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    33,501,855
<OTHER-SE>                                (16,811,891)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               139,125,602
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,039,639
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,924,027
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,877,143
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,072,190
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,833,721)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,833,721)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,833,721)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.44)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 178 (Friday, September 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 74934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20770]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PH24-12-000]


Unison Energy, LLC; Tiger Infrastructure Partners Fund III AIV U 
LP; Notice Tolling 60-Day Period for Action To Allow for Further 
Consideration

    To afford additional time for further consideration of the matters 
at issue in the above-captioned proceeding, the 60-day period for 
action is hereby tolled. See 18 CFR 366.4(b)(1) (2023).

    Dated: September 6, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-20770 Filed 9-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P