alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   			12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,404
<SECURITIES>                                    23,845
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,971
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,729
<PP&E>                                          35,575
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,193
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           399
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,065
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,576
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,520
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,015)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,015)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,015)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.30)


</TABLE>
AAM-12-369-E 

May 29, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10547 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0535 

Mr. Terry Mackey 

Mustang Helicopter, LLC 

HC 13 Box 4302 

Moroni, UT 84667 

Dear Mr. Mackey: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 10, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Mustang Helicopters, LLC (Mustang Helicopters) for an exemption from part 120 of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Mustang 

Helicopters to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Mustang Helicopters. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one 

would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Mustang Helicopters, LLC an exemption from 

14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Mustang Helicopters to cover its safetysensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations 

described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Mustang Helicopters are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations 

at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of 

the Mustang Helicopters part 135 operation, not under part 91 

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M..D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
Amendment No. 6 to the Advisory Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3 
 AMENDMENT NO. 6 
 TO THE 
 ADVISORY AGREEMENT 
 This amendment no. 6 to the Advisory Agreement dated as of November 8, 2007 (the
“Advisory Agreement”) between KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and KBS Capital Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”), is entered as of
October 21, 2008 (the “Amendment”). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meaning set forth in the Advisory Agreement. 
 WHEREAS, upon the terms set forth in this Amendment, the Advisor has agreed to amend and restate Article 16 of the Advisory Agreement and advance funds to the Company upon the terms set forth below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree that Article 16
of the Advisory Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
 ADVANCE 
 Notwithstanding anything contained in Article 9 of this Agreement to the contrary, the Advisor hereby agrees to advance funds (the “Advance”)
to the Company equal to the amount by which the cumulative amount of distributions declared by the Company from January 1, 2006 through the period ending November 30, 2008 exceeds the amount of the Company’s funds from operations (as
defined by NAREIT) from January 1, 2006 through November 30, 2008. Advisor further agrees that the Company will only be obligated to reimburse the Advisor for the Advance if and to the extent that the Company’s cumulative funds from
operations for the period commencing January 1, 2006 through the date of any such reimbursement exceed the lesser of (i) the cumulative amount of any distributions declared and payable to the Company’s Stockholders as of the date of
such reimbursement or (ii) an amount that is equal to a 7.0% cumulative, non-compounded, annual return on Invested Capital for the Company's Stockholders for the period from July 18, 2006 through the date of such reimbursement. Advisor
understands and agrees that no interest shall accrue on the Advance being made under this Agreement. 
 Signature page follows.








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first above
written. 
  

							
	KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
		
	    By:	 	/s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.
		 	Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
	
	KBS CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC
		
	    By:	 	 Schreiber Real Estate Investments, L.P., a
 Manager

			
		 	    By:	 	 Schreiber Investments, LLC, as general
 partner

				
		 		 	By:	 	/s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.
		 		 		 	Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Manager
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MeriStar
Hospitality Corporation (the Issuer) for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Donald D. Olinger, Chief Financial Officer of the
Issuer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m
or 78o(d)); and
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 12, 2003

/s/ Donald D. OlingerDonald D. OlingerChief Financial OfficerMeriStar Hospitality Corporation
# /b e S I 0-100311-00 4 RALEfGH - DURHA M AIRPOR TAUTHORIT Y 100 0 Trad e Driv e * P O Do x8000 1 * RD U Airport . N C 2762 3 Joh n C . Brantley, Airpor

t Directo r,^, , ,9,5 , a-in-^io o • .nx : (9i9 ) 8..o.oi7 s - w«„.,du.co m Marc h 4 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Raymon d LaHood , Secretar y U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 NewJerse yAvenue , S.E . Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Attn : Docke t DOT-OST-2010-003 4 Dea rSecretar

yLaHood : I writ e i n th e capacityo fAirport Directo rofRaleigh-Durha m Internationa l Airpor t (RDti ) t o strongl ysuppor

t th e applicatio n t o th e Departmen t o fTransportatio n o fAmerica n an d Japa n Airline s fo rlimite d antitrus t immunityof thei rpropose d join t busines s agreement . I n th e internationa l ai rtransportatio n arena , th e competitio n trul yha s becom e betwee n th e thre e alliances , supplantin g tha t betwee n individua l airlines . Thus , competitio n an d benefi t t o th e consume rar e maximize d whe n th e alliance s ar e abl e t o compet e o n a n essentiall yequa l footing . Th e Departmen t recentl yconclude d successfu l negotiation s wit h th e governmen t o f Japa n o n a n "Ope n Skies " ai rservic e agreement , fo rwhic h i t i s t o b e commended . Executio n oftha t agreemen t wa s deferred , however , pendin g th e Department' s consid eratio n ofantitrus t application s involvin g bot h ofJapan' s majo rinternationa l ai rcarriers . Thos e application s hav e no wbee n file d - Japa n Airline s wit h America n an d AN Awit h Continenta l an d United . W e support equa l treatmen t an d approva l o fbot h applications , thu s openin g th e doo rt o executio n an d implementatio n o fth e ne wagreement . I als o wan t t o commen d th e Departmen t o n th e substantia l progres s tha t ha s bee n mad e i n recen t month s i n negotiation s wit h th e Europea n Unio n o n th e secon d stag e o f th e U.S.-E.U . "Ope n Skies " agreement . Completio n o ftha t effort wil l provid e benefit s fo rairline s an d consumer s o n bot h side s of th e Atlantic , whil e ensurin g that th e man y benefit s tha t wer e provide d i n th e firs t stag e continu e i n th e future . Than k yo u fo ryou rattentio n t o an d consideratio n ofou rpositio n o n thi s matter . Sincerely . hl6h u C . Brantle y Airpor t Directo r iohn.brantlevtairdu.co m DUF « tA M WAK E COUf J V V DUHIIAWcoui n Y •> . lo-f.rM vHiir. t C l At:):,- : D S.il-.Ci.)".- . HAi.f.;ia H Ki m I ) t'l ;
Attachment 15

Acute Dermal Sanitized
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 4814 Dir ID: 2015 - NM - 105 - AD
1 Brunner, Christine

From: Sargeant, Kathryn Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2014 6:00 PM To: Whiteman, Chad Subject: EPA redlined sections per OMB EO 12866 comments on Tier 3 draft final rule (RIN 2060- AQ86) Attachments: EO 12866_Tier 3 2060-AQ86 FRM Sec VIII_20140222.doc ; EO12866_Tier 3 2060_AQ86 FRM_Ch_6_20140222.doc; EO12866_Tier 3 2060-AQ86 FRM Ch 8_20140222.doc; EO12866_Tier 3 2060-AQ86 FRM Sec I_III_20140222.doc

Chad, as you requested, I am attaching the actual r edlined files of preamble and RIA that contain the changes noted in our response on Feb. 18.

The changes are located in sections I, II, and VIII of the preamble and Chapters 6 and 8 of the RIA.

Please let me know if you have any questions

From: Sargeant, Kathryn Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 7:19 PM To: Whiteman, Chad Cc: Margo_schwab@omb.eop.gov Subject: EPA Response to round 2 EO 12866 Comments on Tier 3 draft final rule (RIN 2060-AQ86)

Chad, our response to the “round 2” comments are at tached.

The “round 2” comments are located in sections I.C, II, and VIII. We have responded to the “OMB2” com ment bubbles within those comment bubbles. We created new comme nt bubbles to respond to the text edits. (As a res ult, the numbering of the comment bubbles has changed from y our original document.)

This document contains our responses only to the “r ound 2” comments. The one exception is our response to the comment bubble in section XII.A (labeled A33 in the first round of comments; it is now A84). That res ponse was still pending in EPA’s 2/17 document that responded to th e first round of comments.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Jim asked me to send this directly to Margo, but I’ m only guessing at her address. Will you please fo rward? Thanks so much.

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 11:49 AM To: Sargeant, Kathryn Cc: Sutton, Tia; Yanca, Catherine Subject: RE: EO 12866 Comments on Tier 3 draft final rule ( RIN 2060-AQ86) - round 2

Kathryn, Attached are additional EO 12866 comments on th e Tier 3 draft final rule (RIN 2060-AQ86). The sec ond round of comments were inserted in the document that I forwa rded on Thursday (2/13) so this document has all co mments that we’ve submitted to date on the preamble (not counti ng the summary comment document). The new comments can be identified with (1) comment bubbles starting with O MB2 and (2) comments found in section VIII (pages 4 34-451). Regards, Chad2 From: Whiteman, Chad Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 1:45 AM To: Sargeant, Kathryn ( sargeant.kathryn@epa.gov ) Subject: EO 12866 Comments on Tier 3 draft final rule (RIN 2060-AQ86)

Kathryn, Attached are some of the EO 12866 comments on the Tier 3 draft final rule (RIN 2060-AQ86). Regards, Chad
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 250 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 250

To prohibit any hiring freeze from affecting any Department of Defense 
           position at, or in support of, a public shipyard.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2017

Mr. Schatz (for himself, Ms. Hassan, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms. Hirono, and Ms. 
   Cantwell) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit any hiring freeze from affecting any Department of Defense 
           position at, or in support of, a public shipyard.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON HIRING FREEZE FROM AFFECTING DEPARTMENT OF 
              DEFENSE PUBLIC SHIPYARD POSITIONS.

    The memorandum titled ``Presidential Memorandum Regarding the 
Hiring Freeze'' published on January 23, 2017, or any other 
substantially similar memorandum, Executive order, or other action by 
the President to prevent a department or agency of the Federal 
Government from filling vacant Federal civilian employee positions or 
creating new such positions, shall have no force or effect with respect 
to any Department of Defense civilian position under which an employee 
performs a Department of Defense function at a public shipyard or a 
Department of Defense function that directly supports a public 
shipyard.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trimol Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
covered in the Report.


                                                     /s/ Shmuel Gurfinkel
                                                     --------------------
                                                     Shmuel Gurfinkel
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     TRIMOL GROUP, INC.

August 14, 2003
ID 

Union Calendar No. 174 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 249 

[Report No. 115–242] 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2017 

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

JULY 24, 2017 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 249 RH

A BILL 

To provide that the pueblo of Santa Clara may lease for 

99 years certain restricted land, and for other purposes. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 249 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF PUEBLO OF SANTA CLARA 

4 LAND ELIGIBLE FOR 99-YEAR LEASE. 

5 Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of Au6 gust 9, 1955 (commonly known as the ‘‘Long-Term Leas7 ing Act’’) (25 U.S.C. 415(a)), is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘Indians,,’’ and inserting ‘‘Indi9 ans,’’; 

10 (2) by inserting ‘‘Ohkay Owingeh pueblo,’’ after 

11 ‘‘Cochiti,’’; 

12 (3) by inserting ‘‘the pueblo of Santa Clara,’’ 

13 after ‘‘Pojoaque,’’; 

14 (4) by striking ‘‘the the lands’’ and inserting 

15 ‘‘the land’’; 

16 (5) by striking ‘‘lands held in trust for the 

17 Pueblo of Santa Clara,’’; and 

18 (6) by striking ‘‘lands held in trust for Ohkay 

19 Owingeh Pueblo’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 174 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 249 

[Report No. 115–242] 

A BILL 

To provide that the pueblo of Santa Clara may 

other purposes. lease for 99 years certain restricted land, and for 

JULY 24, 2017 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David W. Wallis, as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|/s/ David W. Wallis                                                                    
|Name: David W. Wallis
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 16, 2011
#### KILGORE v. STATE.

No. 20742.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 10, 1940.

*714■ ; No attorney for appellant.

■ Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

. KRUEGER,' Judge.

The offense is goat theft; the punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be in dite order. .

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

■ The foregoing opinion of the Commis,sion of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION ***
     In connection with the Annual Report of Retail Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James A. McGrady, Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                   /s/  James A. McGrady   James A. McGrady, Executive Vice President,   Chief Financial Officer, Treasurerand Secretary May 12, 2005
* This Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act orotherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,except as otherwise stated in such filing.