Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [A-570-909]
 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
 SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that Shanghai Yueda Nails Co., Ltd., a.k.a. Shanghai Yueda Nails Industry Co., Ltd. (Shanghai Yueda), an exporter of certain steel nails from the People's Republic of China (China), sold subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
 DATES: Applicable September 13, 2024.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob Palmer or Hannah Lee, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-9068 or (202) 482-1216, respectively.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background This administrative review is being conducted in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Commerce published the notice of initiation of this administrative review on October 17, 2023.[1]
                    
                     In addition to the mandatory respondent, Shanghai Yueda, this review also covers nine other companies. On April 8, 2024, Commerce extended the preliminary results deadline until August 30, 2024.[2]
                    
                     On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in this administrative proceeding by seven days.[3]
                    
                     The deadline for the preliminary results is now September 6, 2024. Scope of the Order [4] The products covered by the 
                    *Order*
                     are nails from China. A full description of the scope of the 
                    *Order*
                     is contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.[5] Intent To Rescind Administrative Review, in Part Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is Commerce's practice to rescind an administrative review of an antidumping duty order where it determines that there were no suspended entries of subject merchandise during the POR.[6]
                    
                     Normally, upon completion of an administrative review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the antidumping duty assessment rate for the review period.[7]
                    
                     Therefore, for an administrative review to be conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry that Commerce can instruct Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate at the calculated antidumping duty assessment rate for the review period.[8] 
 
 On November 8, 2023, Commerce placed CBP entry data on the record for U.S. imports of the subject merchandise during the POR for respondent selection purposes.[9]
                    
                     Eight companies under review have existing separate rates but no suspended entries during the POR.[10]
                    
                     In the absence of any reviewable, suspended entries of subject merchandise from these companies during the POR, Commerce hereby notifies all interested parties of its intent to rescind this administrative review with respect to these companies. Commerce is providing interested parties with an opportunity to submit comments on this preliminary decision, including factual information. Comments, including factual information, from interested parties are due to Commerce no later than seven days after the publication of these preliminary results. Rebuttal comments, including rebuttal factual information, are due seven days thereafter. All submissions must be filed electronically at 
                    *http://access.trade.gov*
                     in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303. Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. We calculated export prices in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Because China is an NME country within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, NV has been calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, 
                    *see*
                     the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as an Appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
                    *https://access.trade.gov.*
                     In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is available at 
                    *https://access.trade.gov/​public/​FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.* Separate Rates We preliminarily determine that Shanghai Yueda is eligible for a separate rate in this administrative review. Because S-Mart (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., Ltd. (S-Mart) did not submit either a separate rate application or a separate rate certification, it is not eligible for a separate rate. Preliminary Results of the Review As a result of our analysis of the information on the record, Commerce preliminarily determines the following estimated weighted-average dumping margin exists for the POR: [11] Exporter
Weighted-average
                             dumping margin 
                             (percent ad valorem)Shanghai Yueda Nails Co., Ltd., a.k.a. Shanghai Yueda Nails Industry Co., Ltd
7.14
 Disclosure and Public Comment Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed for these preliminary results to the parties no later than five days after the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii), interested parties may submit a case brief no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.[12]
                    
                     Interested parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding must submit: (1) a table of contents listing each issue; and (2) a table of authorities.[13] As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior proceedings we have encouraged interested parties to provide an executive summary of their brief that should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. In this review, we instead request that interested parties provide at the beginning of their briefs a public, executive summary for each issue raised in their briefs.[14]
                    
                     Further, we request that interested parties limit their executive summary of each issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. We intend to use the executive summaries as the basis of the comment summaries included in the issues and decision memorandum that will accompany the final results in this administrative review. We request that interested parties include footnotes for relevant citations in the executive summary of each issue. Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).[15] Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) the party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. An electronically filed hearing request must be received successfully in its entirety by Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Final Results of Review Unless extended, we intend to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of our analysis of issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs, within 120 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    .[16] 
 
 Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.[17]
                    
                     Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 35 days after the publication date of the final results of this review in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (
                    *i.e.,*
                     within 90 days of publication). If Shanghai Yueda's 
                    *ad valorem*
                     weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or 
                    *de minimis*
                     (
                    *i.e.,*
                     less than 0.50 percent) in the final results of this review, Commerce will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales and the total quantity of those sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).[18]
                    
                     Commerce will also calculate estimated 
                    *ad valorem*
                     importer-specific assessment rates with which to assess whether the per-unit assessment rate is 
                    *de minimis.*[19]
                    
                     We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is not zero or 
                    *de minimis.*
                     Where Shanghai Yueda's 
                    *ad valorem*
                     weighted-average dumping margin is zero or 
                    *de minimis,*
                     or an importer-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     assessment rate is zero or 
                    *de minimis,*[20]
                    
                     we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales data submitted by Shanghai Yueda, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the rate for the China-wide entity.[21] For the final results, if we continue to treat S-Mart as part of the China-wide entity, we will instruct CBP to apply an 
                    *ad valorem*
                     assessment rate of 118.04 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which was exported by that company. For the companies for which we intend to rescind the review in the final results based on no reviewable entries, provided we receive no contrary information, we intend to instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit rate of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP for these companies no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated antidumping duties, as applicable. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for Shanghai Yueda, the cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review (except that if the 
                    *ad valorem*
                     rate is 
                    *de minimis,*
                     then the cash deposit rate will be zero); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific cash deposit rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the China-wide entity; and (4) for all non-Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties This administrative review and notice are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR 351.213, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: September 6, 2024. Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
 Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Intent to Rescind Review, In Part V. Discussion of the Methodology VI. Recommendation Appendix II Non-Selected Companies Under Review 1. Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd. 2. Nanjing Caiqing Hardware Co., Ltd. 3. Nanjing Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd. 4. Shandong Qingyun Hongyi Hardware Products Co., Ltd. 5. Shanxi Hairui Trade Co., Ltd. 6. Suntec Industries Co., Ltd. 7. Tianjin Jinchi Metal Products Co., Ltd. 8. Xi'an Metals & Minerals Import & Export Co., Ltd.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         
                        *See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,*88 FR 71829 (October 17, 2023). Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,” dated April 8, 2024. Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings,” dated July 22, 2024. Back to Citation
 4.
    
                         
                        *See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Steel Nails from the People's Republic of China,*73 FR 44961 (August 1, 2008) (
                        *Order*). Back to Citation
 5.
    
                         For a complete description of the scope of the 
                        *Order, see*
                         Memorandum, “Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Steel Nails from the People's Republic of China; 2022-2023,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). Back to Citation
 6.
    
                         
                        *See, e.g., Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to Length Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany: Recission*
                         of Antidumping Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 88 FR 4157 (January 24, 2023). Back to Citation
 7.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Back to Citation
 8.
    
                         
                        *See, e.g., Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co.*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         380 F. Supp. 3d 1328, 1335-36 (CIT 2019) (referencing section 751(a) of the Act, the U.S. Court of International Trade held that: “While the statute does not explicitly require that an entry be suspended as a prerequisite for establishing entitlement to a review, it does explicitly state the determined rate will be used as the liquidation rate for the reviewed entries. This result can only obtain if the liquidation of entries has been suspended . . .);” 
                        *see also Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019,*86 FR 36102, and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 4; and 
                        *Solid Fertilizer Grade Ammonium Nitrate from the Russian Federation: Notice of Rescission of 
                            
                            Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,*77 FR 65532 (October 29, 2012) (noting that “for an administrative review to be conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry to be liquidated at the newly calculated assessment rate”). Back to Citation
 9.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Release of Customs Entry Data for Respondent Selection,” dated November 8, 2023. Back to Citation
 10.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Appendix II for a list of these companies. Back to Citation
 11.
    
                         Because no interested party requested a review of the China-wide entity and Commerce no longer considers the China-wide entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews, we did not conduct a review of the China-wide entity. Thus, the rate (
                        *i.e.,*
                         118.04 percent) for the China-wide entity is not subject to change as a result of this review. 
                        *See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings,*78 FR 65963, 65969-70 (November 4, 2013). Back to Citation
 12.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(d); 
                        *see also Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings,*88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (
                        *APO and Final Service Rule*). Back to Citation
 13.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). Back to Citation
 14.
    
                         We use the term “issue” here to describe an argument that Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Back to Citation
 15.
    
                         
                        *See APO and Final Service Rule.* Back to Citation
 16.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; 
                        *see also*19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). Back to Citation
 17.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Back to Citation
 18.
    
                         In these preliminary results, Commerce applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in 
                        *Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification,*77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). Back to Citation
 19.
    
                         For calculated (estimated) 
                        *ad valorem*
                         importer-specific assessment rates used in determining whether the per-unit assessment rate is 
                        *de minimis, see*
                         Memorandum, “Preliminary Results Margin Calculation for Shanghai Yueda Nails Co., Ltd.,” dated concurrently with this notice, and accompanying Margin Calculation Program Logs and Outputs. Back to Citation
 20.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). Back to Citation
 21.
    
                         
                        *See NME Practice*
                         for a full discussion. Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2024-20760 Filed 9-12-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P