alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Amendment No. 1
on
 Form 10-K/A
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
 Or
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from                                          to
 Commission File Number: 0-19222
 Genelabs Technologies, Inc.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 California
    
    94-3010150(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (I.R.S. Employerincorporation or organization)
    
    Identification No.)505 Penobscot Drive,
    
    94063Redwood City, California
    
    (Zip Code)(Address of principal executive offices)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code (650) 369-9500
 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 Title of Each Class of Securities
    
    Name of Each Exchange on Which ListedCommon Stock, no par value
    
    The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC(Nasdaq Capital Market)
 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
 o þ
 o þ
 þ o
 o
  Large accelerated filer o
    
    Accelerated filer o
    
    Non-accelerated filer o
    
    Smaller reporting(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
    
    company þ
 o þ
   DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE




---



##### 



TABLE OF CONTENTS
 PART IVItem 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.SIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXEXHIBIT 31.01EXHIBIT 31.02




---



##### Table of Contents



Explanatory Note
   
 PART IV
 
 Item 15.
    
    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
 Index to Exhibits.
 Exhibit No.
    
    Exhibit Title31.01
    
    Certification of Executive Chairman of the
Board pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and
15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.31.02
    
    Certification of Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  GENELABS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.(Registrant)By:
    /s/ Frederick W. DriscollFrederick W. DriscollPresident and Chief Executive
Officerand Principal Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Exhibit Title31.01
    
    Certification of Executive Chairman of the
Board pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and
15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.31.02
    
    Certification of Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.
(4910-13-P)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT ATlON

Federal AviatioD Administration

14 CFR Part 39

I/-.-KK NlTIALS'S'"

'1:~

2010-011'-:1

'Docket No. FAA-W69-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-186-AD]

RlN 2120-AA64

1/- 27 -of

.8

Ainvorthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Mod TE

It}

ERi 170 and ERJ 190 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

'" ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). / oq

~OL'NGSYM" L (

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new ainvorthiness directive (AD) for the products /rtJ!1 - 1

NITlALI/SlG

listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This proposed AD results from

mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation

product. The Embraer Model ERJ 170 MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation

It has been found the occurrence of an engine in-flight shutdown caused

by the LPCV [low pressure check valves] failing to close due to excessive

wear, which leads to the concerp that such fault may be present in both

engines of a given aircraft .

N'T'''lSISIG

J1 tIlf\ - {(l-l

~

~\J\b-

'~ l-~[lV

LrrING SYMBOL

ANr' -(Of

• • • • • •

An occurrence of an uncommanded engine in-flight shutdown (IFSD) was

reported * * *, which was caused by an ERJ 170 defective LPCV * * *.

The valve failed to close due to excessive wear. Despite there were no

IFSD related to LPCV * * * failure, some ERJ 190 valves * * * were

inspected and presented cracks due to low cycle fatigue. Since this failure

mode also might lead to an engine in-flight shutdown and since both

engines of the airplane have the same valves, there is a possibility of an

•

The Embraer Model ERJ 190 MCA1 describes the unsafe condition as:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22E0030. STATE OF GEORGIA v. CHASE MCDERMOTT.

The State of Georgia filed this motion for emergency stay of an order issued

by the Superior Court of Fulton County in STATE OF GEORGIA v. ONE

THOUSAND ONEHUNDREDTHIRTYAND00/100 DOLLARS ($1,130.00) IN

UNITED STATES CURRENCY, GLOCK 27 .40 CAL. (SERIAL#BAEG436),

Case No. 2021CV351366, to release seized fundsthat issubject to a complaint in rem

for forfeiture pursuant to OCGA §§ 9-16-12 and 16-13-49. 

Attachments to the motion show that the trial court entered a final order in the

forfeiture action in favor of the claimant on February 24, 2022 (“it is hereby

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the $1,130 in United States currency

found on Mr. McDermott’s person shall be RETURNED to Mr. McDermott

INSTANTER”), and that the State filed a timely notice of appeal from the judgment. 

Given that the State’s timely notice of appeal filed as provided in OCGA §§ 5-

6-37 and 5-6-38 serves as supersedeas pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-46 (a), the State is

required to release the condemned property only upon disposition of the appeal.

Accordingly, to maintain the status quo pending appeal, the State’s motion is hereby

GRANTED and enforcement of the trial court’s February 24, 2022 order is stayed. 

See also OCGA § 9-11-62 (a), (e). 

February 28, 2022
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/28/2022
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin Salinas, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 11, 2008



/s/ Martin Salinas, Jr.Martin Salinas, Jr.Chief Financial Officer


*A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to
and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, as amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued4014F
Air Cargo Centralam, Inc., 8001 S.W. 157th Court, Miami, FL 33193
October 13, 2000.1483NF
Tokyo Express Co., Inc., 70 Charter Oak Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94124
July 13, 2000.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Consumer Complaints and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 00-31070 Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

NELSON CINTRON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1517 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 1, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip Federico, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Warren A. Zimmerman, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy and Jonathan S. Tannen, Assistant Attorneys General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
#### KELLY v. STATE.

No. 20954.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 3, 1940.

. Mel Janes, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was charged with the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry area, and by the jury fined the sum of $100.

In the complaint and information it is. alleged that Lubbock County was a dry area, in that at an election held for that purpose a majority of the qualified voters thereof had thus determined, etc;

We find no agreement in the statement of facts relative to such allegations, nor do we find any proof thereof in the statement of facts.

This being a special law, we have held • in many cases that proof of its adoption in a certain locality .must be made, or an agreement relative thereto in evidence. See Branch’s Penal Code, p. 695, Sec. 1231.

Because óf a failure to show in the statement of facts that Lubbock County is a dry area, this judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smith Barney Mid-West Futures Fund L.P. II (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer andDirector     Date: November 12,2004

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-50487

GARY WOODS, as Tax Matters Partner of Tesoro Drive Partners, a Texas 

General Partnership,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 5:05-CV-216

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before JONES, WIENER, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This court affirmed the district court’s judgment, which held that 

valuation-misstatement penalties were inapplicable under existing Circuit 

precedent. Woods v. United States, 471 F. App’x 320 (5th Cir. 2012). On 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 9, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 11-50487 Document: 00512495274 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/09/2014
No. 11-50487

certiorari to resolve a Circuit split, the Supreme Court reversed. Woods v. 

United States, 134 S. Ct. 557 (2013).

As the Supreme Court has now decided the issue raised on appeal and 

reversed our decision, we reverse the judgment of the district court and remand 

for proceedings consistent with the order of the Supreme Court.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

2

 Case: 11-50487 Document: 00512495274 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/09/2014
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2411 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2411

            For the relief of Miguel Angel Perez-Montes, Jr.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 8, 2018

 Ms. Duckworth introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            For the relief of Miguel Angel Perez-Montes, Jr.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MIGUEL ANGEL PEREZ-MONTES, JR.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), on filing 
an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of 
that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for adjustment of status to lawful 
permanent resident, Miguel Angel Perez-Montes, Jr., shall be eligible 
for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that 
of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Miguel Angel Perez-Montes, Jr., 
enters the United States before the date of the filing deadline 
described in subsection (c), the alien shall be--
            (1) considered to have entered and remained lawfully in the 
        United States; and
            (2) eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of 
        the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the 
        date of enactment of this Act, if the alien is otherwise 
        eligible for adjustment of status under that section.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed, 
together with the applicable fees, not later than 2 years after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--On the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Miguel Angel Perez-Montes, 
Jr., the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce 
by 1, during the current or next following fiscal year--
            (1) the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
        available to natives of the country of birth of the alien under 
        section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
        1153(a)); or
            (2) if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that 
        are made available to natives of the country of birth of the 
        alien under section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)).
                                 <all>
```
S. 2553 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit Medicare part D plans 

from restricting pharmacies from informing individuals regarding the prices for 

certain drugs and biologicals. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Know the Lowest Price Act 

of 2018’’. 

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LIMITING CERTAIN INFORMATION ON DRUG 

PRICES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–4 of the Social Security Act 

(42 U.S.C. 1395w–104) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(m) PROHIBITION ON LIMITING CERTAIN INFORMATION ON DRUG

PRICES.—A PDP sponsor and a Medicare Advantage organization 

shall ensure that each prescription drug plan or MA–PD plan 

offered by the sponsor or organization does not restrict a pharmacy 

that dispenses a prescription drug or biological from informing, 

nor penalize such pharmacy for informing, an enrollee in such 

plan of any differential between the negotiated price of, or 

copayment or coinsurance for, the drug or biological to the enrollee 

under the plan and a lower price the individual would pay for 

the drug or biological if the enrollee obtained the drug without 

using any health insurance coverage.’’. 
S. 2553—2 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 

shall apply to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2020. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of-- ) 

) 

OBD Insaat Taahhut Turizm ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W912ER-14-C-0026 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61169 

David F. Dowd, Esq. 

Mayer Brown LLP 

Washington, DC 

Thomas J. Warren, Esq. 

Acting Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Pietro 0. Mistretta, Esq. 

Regina L. Schowalter, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorneys 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Middle East 

Winchester, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 10 April 2018 

A:dministrative Judge 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61169, Appeal of OBD Insaat Taahhut 

Turizm, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
# I

"IERCIAL 

### INVO CE

# NO DATE 

### c MBT

# 080101 8APR L

### 2009 CONSIGNOR 

# : M 55 

### ON BIOTECHNOLOG ES SDN BHD ADDRESS

# : C26 

### 05, 3 SQUARE, 

### NO.2 IALAN 

### 19/l

46300 PETALING JAYA, SELGANOR, MALAYS A PHONE 

# : 603 1964 8114 FAX

# : 603 7964 8711 PROFORMA NVO CE 

### NO. : PF 

### MBT 

### 080070 DTD:02-03-2009 L/C

# NO: 2562 MP1C0000309 

## CUSTOMER: SHEEL 

### CHAND NDUSTR E5 ADDRESS

# : PLOT NO 13 SEC 2 

### PANINAGAR NDUSTRIAL ESTATE RUDRAPUR DLSSTT U

### S NAGAR PI-]ONE: 

### DAIE OF

# L/Cr 13 lvlar 09 TERMS OF

# SALE L/C AT 

### sIGHT 

# NCOTERMS: FOB KUANTAN SHEEL 

### CHAND INDSUTRIES IMPORT/EXPORT L CENCE 

### NO. :

### 2904002626 DATED DECEMBER 

### 19,2OO4 

## CONSIGNEE: SHEEL 

### CHAND NDUSTR ES SS

# : PLOT 

### NO 13 SEC 2 PANTNAGAR

INDUSTR AL ESTATE RUDRAPUR DISSTT U.S. NAGAR PORT OF LOAD 

## NG: KUANTAN, MALAYS A PORT OF D SCHARGE 

## : NHAVA 

### 5HEVA, ND A SH 

### PMENT 

# DATE 11 

### Apr 09



### 249.05MT CRUDE GLYCER N

### W TH 

### MIN 80 PERCENT IN FLEX 

### BtE BAGSAT THE RATE 

### UsD 150 USD 

### PMT AGA NST SALE 

### CONTRACT/PERFORMA NVO CE 

### NO PF 

### MBT O8OO7O DTD 

### 02 03 2009 METR CTONNE

NOTES 

# 1 All orices 

### ouoted her€inare 

### in USD 

### Dollars 

# 2 Delivery must be 

### completed 

### b€fore14th of April 09 

# 3 HS 

### Cod€: 

### 1520.0000 

# 4 lmport ticence No.

### 2904002626/lmport not included in

### the Negative List 

### of 

### lmport Export Policy 

### 2002-2007 

# 5 lt is

### certifiedthat Goods as 

### per 

### Order/lndent No. PF 

### MBT 

### 080070 DTD 

### 02-03-2009 

### TT N ADVANCE LETTER OF CRED T EANKER ACCEPTANCE 

### NAME M SS

### ON BIOTECHNOLOG E5 SDN BHD HSEC BANK MALAYSIA EERHAD NO, 

### 2, LEBOH 

### AMPANG, 5O1OO KUALA LUN,4PUR, N,4ALAYsIA, 

# COMMERCIAL INVOICE



# ,8'Y9- PREPARED BY SHANTI N.KR SHNAN SEN OR EXECUT VE, CONT]MERC 

## At 

# ,l.! NALATHAMBY GENERAL 

### MANAGER, COMMERC

## At
#### GOODE v. STATE.

No. 19758.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 11, 1938.

Clarke Wills, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of' burglary, and his punishment assessed at five years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception. The indictment seems to be in proper form. All matters of procedure appearing regular, the judgment will be affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF POST PROPERTIES, INC. FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000903127
<NAME> POST PROPERTIES INC

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      21,349,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                   2,588,658,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             310,988,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,419,931,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                  1,046,847,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<COMMON>                                       391,000
<OTHER-SE>                               1,062,812,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,419,931,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            95,443,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               49,338,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,701,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             31,966,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         24,964,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                24,964,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.63


</TABLE>