alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIFRA SAP Meeting , February 15

- 18, 2011 : Chlorpyrifos Physiologically

- Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharm acodynamic (PBPK/PD) Modeling linked to the Cumulative and Aggregate Risk Evaluation System (CARES)

January 21, 2011

E

- Docket Availability of Attachments A

- H

The central background document for the February 15

- 18, 2011 FIFRA SAP meeting is entitled,

“ Source

- to

- Outcome Modeling Physiologically

- Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) Model linked to a Dietary Exposure Model: Chlorpyrifos as a Case Study.” This document refers to eight supporting attachments “A” to “H

. ” These were provided to the SAP members on a CD

- ROM. A listing of the contents for each attachment appears below, along with any explanatory notes.

1. Attachment A: In vitro human metabolism summary (1 page). Note: Full copy of draft manuscript for submission has been made available to panel members in paper copy format (the publisher granted limited distribution of copyright

- protected materials).

2. Attachment B: Philpott, P. (2009) "June 24

- 25, 2009 EPA Human Studies Review Board Meeting Report." Memo and final report (40 pages).

3. Attachment C: The LifeStage and Variation models: acslX programs and associated m files.

4. Attachment D: Cleveland, C.B. (2010) "2010 Update of the Acute Dietary Risk Assessment for Chlorpyrifos." Dow AgroSciences Unpublished Report 101760 (140 pages).

5. Attachment E: Copies of inputs files used in dietary models (CARES, DEEM, LIFELINE).

6. Attachment F: Copies of input files for PBPK/PD model runs.

7. Attachment G: Marty, M.S. and Andrus, A.K. (2010) "Comparison of Cholinesterase (ChE) Inhibition in Young Adult and Preweanling CD Rats after Acute and Repeated Chlorpyrifos or Chlorpyrifos

- oxon Exposures." Dow AgroSciences Unpublished Report 091107. Pub lic release summary (7 pages).

8. Attachment H: Reiss, R.; Neal, B.; Lamb, J. (2010) "Benchmark Dose Modeling for Cholinesterase Inhibition from Exposure to Chlorpyrifos and Chlorpyrifos

- Oxon." Dow AgroSciences Unpublished Report 0900956.000 B0T0 06010. Public release summary (4 pages).

Note to the public : Special software programs are required to use the modeling and modeling input files contained within the Attachments C, E and F folders . As such, these attachments will not be available electronically via the F ederal eRulemaking Portal : http://www.regulations.gov . These attachments will be o n a CD

- ROM available from the Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S

– 4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The full articles cited in Attachments A, D, G and H, restricted by copyright

protection, will also be available in paper copy format from the OPP Regulatory Public Docket.
#### BRYANT v. BEYER CO., Inc.

No. 1329.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Feb. 23, 1933.

Rehearing Denied March 30, 1933.

J. E. Greer, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Barnett *&*Klein, of San Antonio, for appel-lee.

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This action was brought by Beyer Company, Inc., a corporation, against C. K. Bryant to recover the (balance of the purchase price of a radio set. The defense was payment. The verdict of the jury was for the plaintiff, and judgment entered accordingly. The defendant appealed.

 The issue of payment arose in this manner. In September, 1929, a corporation by the name of A. F. Beyer Company, Inc., sold the radio set to Bryant, and took his written contract for the purchase price, payable in installments. This contract was assigned to a financing corporation. Thereafter A. F. Beyer Company, Inc., was adjudged a bankrupt. In 1930 Beyer Company, Inc., appellee herein, was incorporated. It purchased the Bryant contract from the financing corporation. At the time A. F. Beyer Company, Inc., was adjudged a 'bankrupt, Bryant was in the employment of the Texas Outdoor Advertising Company, which company was a creditor of the bankrupt corporation, A. F. Beyer Company, Inc. Bryant, evidently thinking that the bankrupt corporation still held his contract and that he could offset his personal indebtedness to the bankrupt against the amount due his employer by said bankrupt, sent the trustee in bankruptcy a check for the balance due on his contract, less the amount due his employer by *139the bankrupt, and marked same in full settlement of bis account. The trustee, without the knowledge or consent of the holder of the Bryant contract, cashed the check. The appellant contends that the cashing of said check with said indorsement estopped the appellee herein to demand the balance due on his contract. It is apparent that the appellant could not offset the indebtedness due by the bankrupt to his employer against his personal indebtedness to the bankrupt. It is also apparent that, since the claim against Bryant did not belong to the bankrupt corporation, the trustee in bankruptcy could not, by his conduct, release any part of appellant’s indebtedness to appellee. It appears that his account has been credited with the full amount which he paid to the trustee in bankruptcy, and the judgment rendered herein is only for the balance due on said contract. There is no error in the judgment of the trial court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
[No. 45833-7-I.

Division One.

December 26, 2000.]

#### Mercer Place Condominium Association, *Appellant,*v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 97-2-01341-1, R. Joseph Wesley, J., entered September 7, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kennedy, J., concurred in by Grosse and Ellington, JJ. Now published at 104 Wn. App. 597.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4787-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of West Virginia (FEMA-4787-DR), dated May 24, 2024, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued August 16, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of West Virginia is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 24, 2024.

Boone County for Individual Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-20485 Filed 9-10-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### CARTER v. STATE.

No. 20321.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 29, 1939.

Denman & Fowler, of Nacogdoches, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*647GRAVES, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of failure to stop 'and render aid, and her punishment assessed at three and one-half years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or hills of exception, hence no question is presented for review.

We note that the trial court, in sentencing appellant, failed to observe the indeterminate sentence law. Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.. art. 775. Therefore the sentence will be reformed so as to read that appellant be confined in the State penitentiary not less than one hour nor more than three and one-half years, and as thus reformed the judgment will be affirmed.
#### FIERRO v. STATE.

No. 19922.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 16, 1938.

*598Maxwell Burkett, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Van Henry Archer, of San Antonio, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for violating the following ordinance of the City of San Antonio: “It shall be unlawful' .for any person or persons to *stand or sit*upon the plazas, streets, sidewalks or banquettes of the city, so as to impede the progress of pedestrians.” Punishment for the offense denounced was by a fine of not less than five dollars nor more than two hundred dollars. Appellant was first tried in the City Court and fined the sum of thirty dollars. She appealed to the County Court at Law No. 2 of Bexar County, where she was again found guilty and assessed a fine of one hundred and twenty-five dollars.

Our State’s Attorney suggests that the order extending the trial term of the County Court at Law may be affected by the. opinion of the Supreme Court in Hamilton et al. v. Empire Gas & Fuel Company, 110 S.W.2d 561. We find no error whatever in the order of extension; It was made alone for- the purpose of concluding the trial in this particular case, which fact is so recited in the order. The case of Knight v. State, 99 Tex.Cr.R. 15, 267 S.W. 983, is controlling here.

It was particularly charged that appellant “ * * * did unlawfully *stand*and *sit*at and near a public place, to-wit: 109 S. Pecos St. * * * upon the plazas, streets, sidewalks and banquettes of the city, and did thereby impede the - progress of pedestrians.”

The testimony showed that appellant and other parties were on strike in the City of San Antonio, and that appellant and other women were picketing the place designated in the complaint. There were three in one group and four in the other group. They were walking three or four abreast and would-travel around the entire block and would meet and one group pass through the other. It would be necessary for -other pedestrians on the street to sometimes step aside or wait their chance to. get through, or wait until the picket line had moved on.

We are required by Article 8, P.C., to give to words which are not specifically defined the meaning in which they are understood in common language. Making application of this principle we think the ordinance under which appellant was convicted fails to cover the acts which are sought to show an offense. The evidence excludes the idea that appellant or her companions were sitting on the sidewalk. All the evidence indicated that they were at all times *moving*thereon. The ordinary definition of the word “standing”, as found in Webster’s International Dictionary, is “stopping or coming to a stand; the state of being erect upon the feet, maintenance of position, not movable, fixed.”

It is conceived that the ordinance might have been so drawn as to cover the acts complained of against appellant, but as_ we find it we think the conviction can not be sustained.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Consent(Director)


                          

EXHIBIT 10-03 

GOLDEN SPIRIT ENTERPRISES LTD.

(the “Company”)

CONSENT TO ACT AS OFFICER

I hereby consent to act as a President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and acknowledge that I am not disqualified to become or to act as a director under Section 141 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

I hereby confirm that:

1

I am not under the age of 18 years;

2

I have not been found by a court, in the United States of America or elsewhere, to be incapable of managing my own affairs;

3

I am not an undischarged bankrupt; and

4

I have not been convicted in or out of Delaware of an offence in connection with the promotion, formation or management of a corporation or unincorporated business, or of an offence involving fraud.

In addition, the undersigned hereby consents to the holding of any meeting of the directors or of a committee of the directors of the Company by means of such telephonic, electronic or other communication facility, as permit all persons participating in the subject meetings to communicate adequately with each other.




This consent shall continue in effect from year to year so long as the undersigned is re-elected to the board of directors, provided that in the event that the undersigned revokes this consent or resigns from the board of directors, this consent shall cease to have effect from the date of receipt in writing by the Company of such revocation or resignation, as the case may be, or, if the latter, the effective date of such resignation.

DIRECTORS HAVE SUBSTANTIAL DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT LIABILITIES. THE PERSON SIGNING THIS CONSENT SHOULD OBTAIN INDEPENDENT LEGAL ADVICE.

		
	Dated

	November 18, 2008


	Print name

	Christopher Scheive


	Address

	


400 Blvd. Thomas

Unit 400

Lachute, Quebec, J8H 1V7


	

  Signature

	

  /s/: C. Scheive
<PAGE>

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation of our report dated December 2, 1999 on the
financial statements of ADDvantage Media Group, Inc. as of September 30, 1999
and for the nine months ended September 30, 1999 and the year ended December
30, 1998 included in this Form 10-KSB Annual Report of ADDvantage Media Group,
Inc. as of September 30, 1999, into ADDvantage Media Group, Inc.'s previously
Filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-12641).


TULLIUS TAYLOR SARTAIN & SARTAIN LLP

December 29, 1999
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Frank W. Getman Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of
BayCorp Holdings, Ltd., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BayCorp
 Holdings, Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared.
     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
     c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

     a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
     b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 6, 2003       By:  /s/ Frank W. Getman Jr.
                                 -----------------------------
                                 Frank W. Getman Jr.
                                 President and Chief Executive
                                 Officer
                                 (principal executive officer)
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 019 Attachment Name CAS RN 1456802-89-3 Manufacturing process and impurity file Associated PMN Section Number N/A Contains CBI Report Number Sanitized Version

# All CBI has been removed
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Hollings C. Renton, Chairman of the Board, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), and Gregory W. Schafer, VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of hisknowledge:**1.** The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and**2.** The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Reportand results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.Dated: November 9, 2006              /s/ Hollings C. Renton   Hollings C. Renton   Chairman of the Board, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)            /s/ Gregory W. Schafer   Gregory W. Schafer   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)   A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13(a)-14(b) of the Exchange Actand Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350) has beenprovided to Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.“This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofOnyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective ofany general incorporation language contained in such filing.”
44
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF IMC MORTGAGE COMPANY FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,690
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          16,586
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,441,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           308
<OTHER-SE>                                     286,047
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,441,422
<SALES>                                        131,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               181,173
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               117,668
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              76,611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,332
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,432
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,432
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.90
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 3.13.1

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

OF

U.S. Propane,
L.L.C.



| | 1. | The name of the limited liability company is U.S. Propane, L.L.C.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The Certificate of Formation of the limited liability company is hereby amended as follows:
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The name of the limited liability company is Energy Transfer Partners, L.L.C.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Amendment of U.S. Propane,
L.L.C. this 25thday of February, 2005.



/s/ Kelcy WarrenKelcy WarrenAuthorized Person