alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ex parte MAYS.

No. 20223.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 16, 1938.

R. L. Graves, of Brownfield, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*599GRAVES, Judge.

This relator stands charged with the offense of rape upon one Mattie Williams. He was denied bail upon a hearing before the district judge, and appeals from such order.

The details of this alleged offense are so sordid and revolting that they will not be set forth herein, nor commented upon. Suffice it to say that in our opinion the trial court was justified in refusing relator the privilege of bail, and his judgment denying bail to relator is therefore affirmed.
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statements Nos. 33-31505, 33-50688, 33-54387, 33-52389, 33-55629, 333-32977, 333-37145, 333-79921, 333-38174, 333-53502, 333-90954, 333-97005, 333-105914, 333-138191, 333-139959, 333-155958 and 333-155959 on FormS-8 of our report dated March 12, 2009 relating to the financial statements of AnnTaylor Stores Corporation, and the effectiveness of AnnTaylor Stores Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Reporton Form 10-K of AnnTaylor Stores Corporation for the year ended January 30, 2010. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

New York, New York 

March 12, 2010
exv10w3







	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.3




AMENDMENT NO. 2

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 to Employment Agreement dated effective June 1, 2004 (the
“Agreement”), by and between Quanta Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(“Employer”), and Kenneth W. Trawick (“Employee”), as amended by Amendment No. 1 to
Employment Agreement dated effective March 17, 2007, is hereby entered into this 6th day of
November, 2008.



     WHEREAS, Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations
promulgated thereunder (collectively, “Section 409A”) require that payments of nonqualified
deferred compensation to “specified employees” be delayed for six months from “separation from
service” (as those terms are defined under Section 409A);



     WHEREAS, Employee is currently identified as a “specified employee” in accordance with
Section 409A;



     WHEREAS, the Agreement provides for the payment of certain severance benefits upon termination
of service, which may be considered nonqualified deferred compensation subject to Section 409A; and



     WHEREAS, Employer and Employee desire to amend the terms of the Agreement to comply with
Section 409A.



     NOW, THEREFORE, Employer and Employee agree as follows:



     1. Section 20 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and is replaced with the following
new Section 20:




     “20. Compliance with Section 409A of the Code. Notwithstanding any
other provision to the contrary, if the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Employer (the “Committee”) determines in its discretion
that severance payments due under this Agreement constitute “nonqualified deferred
compensation” subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the “Code”), and that the Employee is a “specified employee” as
defined in Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code and the regulations and other
guidance issued thereunder, then such severance payments shall commence on the first
payroll date of the seventh month following the month in which the Employee’s
termination occurs (with the first such payment being a lump sum equal to the
aggregate severance payments the Employee would have received
during the prior six-month period if no such delay had been imposed). For purposes
of this Agreement, whether the Employee is a “specified employee” will



 - 1 - 









 







be determined
in accordance with the written procedures adopted by the Committee which are
incorporated by reference herein.”



     2. Any provisions of the Agreement not specifically amended herein shall remain in full force
and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto set their hand the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	EMPLOYER:



Quanta Services, Inc.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ DARREN B. MILLER
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Darren B. Miller 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Vice President – Information

Technology and Administration 	 
	 
	 	EMPLOYEE:

 	 
	 	/s/ KENNETH W. TRAWICK
 	 
	 	Kenneth W. Trawick 	 
	 	 	 



 - 2 -
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PUSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PUSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Form 10-K of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard N.
Marshall, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge (i)  the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except as otherwise noted under Item 9A(T)
therein,and
(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/  RICHARD N.
MARSHALL


Richard
N. Marshall


Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


February
26, 2009














This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 5/5/15 12:21 PM

Received: May 04, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8ing-y425

Comments Due: May 04, 2015

Submission Type: API

Docket: BIS-2015-0010

U.S. Industrial Base Surveys Pursuant to the Defense Production Act of 1950

Comment On: BIS-2015-0010-0001

U.S. Industrial Base Surveys Pursuant to the Defense Production Act

Document: BIS-2015-0010-DRAFT-0002

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-04299

Submitter Information

Name: Dartanya Anderson

Address: 

2 Hendricks Court

North Vernon, IN, 47265

Email: dartagnandarnell@gmail.com

Phone: 4049600748

Organization: U.S. Citizenship

General Comment

The corporation does not posses the rights of citizenship within U.S. borders, privileges or 

immunity clause ensures this within The Constitution of the United States of America. Societal 

roles force us to consider the implications surrounding predictive analytics based in Logic while 

the National Identity is a consensus being manufactured through a rational theory exercise in 

speculative risk. Insurers effectively are prohibited from utilizing coercion due to the McCarran 

Ferguson Act, however significant concerns exist with regard to the applicability of industry

influence with-out the force of Anti-trust regulations to secure American values toward equality. 

A proposal to reduce the unnecessary burdens establishing this future of regulation, suggests the 

McCarran Ferguson Act may be applied to the Gramm Leech Bliley Act as a measured and 

proportionate Logic introduced to the irrational manufacture of consent.
March 21, 1995


Ms. Nancy M. Jakobs
79 Burda Avenue
New City, New York 10956

Dear Nancy:

I am pleased to present Orange and Rockland's offer of employment to
you for the position of Vice President - Human Resources effective
April 3, 1995.  The general details are as follows:

Position:  Vice President - Human Resources reporting to the Vice
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

Base Salary:  $130,000 per year.

Incentive Compensation:  Participation in the Orange and Rockland
Utilities, Inc. annual and long term Incentive Compensation Programs. 
For 1995, participation will be prorated for the period you are
employed at Orange Rockland.

Vacation:  Four weeks per year upon employment; five weeks after seven
years.

Insurance:  Eligibility for all insurance programs such as medical,
dental, vision and prescription drugs, and any other benefits afforded
to management employees per plan provisions.  Eligibility will begin
on the first of the month after hire.

Sick Leave:  Per Company policy, with immediate participation of 10
days for 1995 recognizing industry standards and taking into account
your seniority and experience as of date of hire.

Severance:  Participation in the Company's Severance Policy with the
exception that upon termination by the Company for its convenience
other than for cause, the benefit level will be set at the maximum of 
52 weeks.

Management Savings Plan:  Eligible for participation after one
calendar year of employment, per plan provisions.<PAGE>
Ms. Nancy M. Jakobs
March 21, 1995
Page - 2 -




Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan:  Per Company policy.

Employees' Retirement Plan of Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.: 
Eligible for participation per plan provisions.

Long Term Disability (LTD) Plan:  Participation in the Executive Group
LTD plan which has a three month waiting period, benefit formula of 66
2/3% of your base salary and short term incentive target, and a
maximum benefit amount of $15,000 per month.

Indemnification:  Per Company policy.

D&O Insurance:  Per Company policy.

Your election as an Officer of the Company will occur at the April 6, 
1995 Board of Directors meeting.
          
Nancy, on behalf of the entire Board and management team - Welcome! 
I'm especially glad that you are joining O&R and I look forward to
working with you in the near future.




                                                Sincerely,




                                                D. Louis Peoples
                              


Agreed:___Nancy_M._Jakobs____

Date:__March_22,_1995________                          

      



                                                   
dlp/dmg
jakobs.doc
Jay Lasco

2484 Margaret Dr.

Fenton, MI 48430

810.691.5759

A petition to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption part 21 subpart H,§§ 45.23(b), 

61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a),91.203(a) and (b), 91.205(b), 

91.215, part 91 subpart E of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The exemption would allow 

the petitioner to operate the DJI Phantom Vision 2 unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) to conduct aerial 

photography for real estate, surveying, and marketing.

The petitioner proposes to operate the Phantom Vision 2 UAS to conduct short duration (>30 minute) 

aerial photography and videography for homeowners, businesses, realtors, home builders, and home 

contractors for real estate marketing and exterior structure photography. 

Operation will use the AMA safety code as a minimum standard for safe operation along with all private 

pilot safety measures. All flights will be in reasonably controlled environments with only crew and client 

allowed on location during operation. 

Jay Lasco is a Private Pilot and holds a single engine land and high performance endorsement, along with 

up to date third class medical certificate. Private Pilot Certificate Number - 3702017

Jay Lasco has worked in video and film production along with radio controlled devices for over 15 years,

and has the skill, experience and wisdom to safely operate UAS. This experience will be a benefit to 

consumers of aerial video and the public by combining experience in video and film production, along 

with the safety of operating with minimal exposure to the public for short duration flights. 

The UAS used commonly fits into the model aircraft category and In consideration of the size, weight, 

speed, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, Jay Lasco’s 

operation of the Phantom Vision 2 UAS meets the conditions of Section 333 and will not require an 

airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.

Respectfully,

Jay Lasco
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofApplied Extrusion Technologies, Inc. (“AET”) on Form 10-K for the period endedSeptember 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer hereby certifies pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, (i)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in thisreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of AET.

 

Signed this 1st day of February,2005

 
| /s/ Brian P. Crescenzo                           |
|--------------------------------------------------|
| Brian P. Crescenzo                               |
| Vice President Finance,  Secretary and Treasurer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to AET and will be retained by AETand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00209-CR

Don Veloz, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 9034221, HONORABLE MICHAEL LYNCH, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: September 30, 2004

Do Not Publish
| **Royalties And Licenses (Tables)**     | 9 Months Ended                                                                                                                                                                              |
|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
||
| **Royalties And Licenses [Abstract]**   |                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| Schedule Of Royalty-Related Assets      |  As ofDecember 31, 2012 As of March 31, 2012Other current assets$47 $85Other assets92 102Royalty-related assets$139 $187                                           |
| Schedule Of Royalty-Related Liabilities |  As ofDecember 31, 2012 As ofMarch 31,2012Accrued royalties$123 $98Other accrued expenses23 23Other liabilities50 52Royalty-related liabilities$196 $173 |

| X                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**ea_RoyaltiesAndLicensesAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**ea_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Schedule of royalty-related assets
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**ea_ScheduleOfRoyaltyRelatedAssetsTableTextBlock**Namespace Prefix:**ea_**Data Type:**nonnum:textBlockItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Schedule of royalty-related liabilities
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**ea_ScheduleOfRoyaltyRelatedLiabilitiesTableTextBlock**Namespace Prefix:**ea_**Data Type:**nonnum:textBlockItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
### Simulation results by Dr. George Fernandez

Examination of T and GLiM CIs with 8 Subjects

– Using SAS GLIMMIX

Subject

‐ Subject Background Variation (Logit SD) = 0.3

Subject

‐ Subject Protection Variation (Logit SD) = 0

NrSims = 5000, Seed = 98135183

Overall

Bkg

Rate,% True

% Prot Mean

% Prot

T Half Width

T CI Coverage

T CI Mean

% Prot

GLiM Half Width

GLiM CI Coverage

GLiM CI

10 70 68.3 12.3 95 69.6 14.0 99

85 84.2 8.2 95 84.7 8.7 98

95 94.8 4.3 94 94.9 4.6 99

98 97.9 4.2 93 97.9 3.3 98

Overall

Bkg

Rate,% True

% Prot Mean

% Prot

T Half Width

T CI Coverage

T CI Mean

% Prot

GLiM Half Width

GLiM CI Coverage

GLiM CI

25 70 69.5 7.0 94 69.8 9.6 99

85 84.7 4.8 95 84.8 5.8 99

95 94.9 2.7 94 94.9 2.9 99

98 98.0 1.6 94 98.0 1.8 98

Overall

Bkg

Rate,% True

% Prot Mean

% Prot

T Half Width

T CI Coverage

T CI Mean

% Prot

GLiM Half Width

GLiM CI Coverage

GLiM CI

50 70 69.9 4.5 95 70.0 6.3 100

85 84.9 3.2 95 84.9 3.8 99

95 95.0 1.8 95 95.0 1.9 98

98 98.0 1.2 94 98.0 1.2 98

Overall

Bkg

Rate,% True

% Prot Mean

% Prot

T Half Width

T CI Coverage

T CI Mean

% Prot

GLiM Half Width

GLiM CI Coverage

GLiM CI

75 70 69.9 3.4 96 70.0 4.1 99

85 85.0 2.5 95 85.0 2.7 98

95 95.0 1.5 95 95.0 1.4 98

98 98.0 0.9 94 98.0 0.9 97
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                             572
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,151
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,257)
<INVENTORY>                                     66,010
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,407
<PP&E>                                         101,379
<DEPRECIATION>                                (66,241)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,638
<BONDS>                                         26,746
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,018
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   124,108
<SALES>                                        146,853
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               146,853
<CGS>                                          131,002
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  131,002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,840)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (425)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,415)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,415)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.6.1

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
ANNTAYLOR STORES CORPORATION2003 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

The
AnnTaylor Stores Corporation 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan) is hereby
amended effective as of March 9, 2004 (the Effective Date) as set forth below.

1.       
          The second sentence of Section 6(f) of the Plan is hereby amended in its
          entirety to read as follows, effective with respect to all Options (as defined
          in the Plan) granted pursuant to the Plan, including outstanding Options granted
          before the Effective Date:

| | In
the event that the employment or service of an Optionee shall terminate or cease other
than by reason of death, Disability or Retirement, all Options theretofore granted to such
Optionee that are exercisable at the time of such termination may, to the extent not
theretofore exercised or canceled, be exercised at any time within three (3) months after
such termination of employment or cessation of service, as applicable; provided, however,
that the Committee may in its discretion extend the period for exercise of such Options to
a date later than three (3) months after such separation or cessation date, but in any
event not beyond the date on which the Option would otherwise expire pursuant to Section
6(e) hereof; provided, further, that if the employment of an Optionee shall terminate for
Cause, all Options theretofore granted to such Optionee shall, to the extent not
theretofore exercised, forthwith terminate immediately upon termination.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Except
as set forth above, the Plan is hereby ratified and affirmed in all respects.