alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.2


 


FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF BOSTON


 


2008 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION POLICY


As Revised October 17, 2008


 


A
fee of $2,075 per meeting shall be paid to all Directors that attend all or
part of a meeting of the Board of Directors. 
A fee of $2,850 per meeting shall be paid to the vice chair of the
Board.  A fee of $3,650 per meeting shall
be paid to the chair of the Board.  This
fee shall also be provided to any person elected by the Board to serve as
chairman pro tempore or to the vice chair if the vice chair presides for an
entire meeting of the Board.  There are
nine regularly scheduled meetings in 2008.


 


A
fee of $750 per meeting shall be paid to all committee members, including ex
officio members, who attend all or any part of any meeting of a committee of
the Board.  A fee of $750 shall be paid
to any director who attends all or part of the annual shareholders meeting.


 


A
fee of $500 per meeting shall be paid to any Director for participation in
telephonic conference calls or when participating by telephone for all or any
part of a meeting in which the Director would be entitled to receive a meeting
fee for in-person attendance at such meeting.


 


Fees
shall be paid per meeting.  For example,
if a Board meeting and committee meeting occur on the same day, a separate fee
shall be payable for attendance at each meeting.  Additionally, in the case of a multi-day
meeting, a separate fee shall be payable for each day’s attendance at the same
meeting.


 


In
the event that inclement weather prevents the occurrence of a planned meeting
of the Board or one of its committees, the Directors shall be entitled to
receive the applicable meeting fee called for in the Statement of Policy, minus
any fees received if an in-person meeting is changed to a telephonic meeting.


 


Administrative
Matters


 


The
Personnel Committee shall annually review this policy and shall submit its
recommendation to the Board.  The Board
shall consider the recommendations of the Personnel Committee and shall approve
the policy no later than the first regularly scheduled meeting of the Board in
which the policy shall apply.  The Board
is authorized, in its sole discretion, to interpret the provisions of the
policy and to address situations not anticipated by the policy, consistent with
the requirements set forth in the regulations promulgated by the Federal
Housing Finance Agency, if any.
2008
RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
 
 Award
 Shares
 Issuance of Restricted Shares
 Plan Incorporated
 Policy Incorporated. Impact of
Restatement of Financial Statements Upon Awards Policy
 Restricted Shares
 Forfeiture Restrictions




---



##### 



Lapse of Forfeiture Restrictions
 (i)
    
    Lapse Date:
  (ii)
    
    Restricted Stock Agreement Earnings Per Share (RSAEPS)
  (iii)
    
    Restricted Stock Agreement Return on Equity (RSAROE)
  (iv)
    
    Performance Goals
   Threshold RSAEPS goal:
    
    $
    9.35Target RSAEPS goal:
    
    $
    10.62Maximum RSAEPS goal:
    
    $
    11.49
  Threshold RSAROE goal:
    
    
    28.4
    %Target RSAROE goal:
    
    
    30.8
    %
 2




---



##### 



Maximum RSAROE goal:
    
    
    33.2
    %
 (v)
    
    Percentage of Number of Restricted Shares Awarded Pursuant to RSAEPS Goals to Which
Forfeiture Restrictions Lapse:
 If RSAEPS equal or exceed the maximum RSAEPS goal:
    
    
    100
    %If RSAEPS equals the target RSAEPS:
    
    
    50
    %If RSAEPS are less than the threshold RSAEPS goal:
    
    
    0
    %
     (vi)
    
    Percentage of Number of Restricted Shares Awarded Pursuant to RSAROE Goals to Which
Forfeiture Restrictions Lapse:
 If RSAROE equals or exceeds the maximum RSAROE goal:
    
    
    100
    %If RSAROE equals the target RSAROE goal:
    
    
    50
    %If RSAROE is less than the threshold RSAROE goal:
    
    
    0
    %
   (vii)
    
    Effect of Termination of Employment
  3




---



##### 



Dividend Restriction
 Certificates
 Withholding of Tax
 4




---



##### 



Status of Stock
 Employment Relationship
 Committees Powers
 Binding Effect
 Governing Law
 5




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.By:Name:Title:Employee  I do not
 I do
 
    
    I acknowledge that the Company has suggested that before this line is initialed that I
check with a tax consultant of my choice.
 6




---



##### 



Policy: Impact of Restatement of Financial Statements Upon Awards. (Adopted by Management
Development and Compensation Committee December 2006.)
  7
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. ARCADIO MANDEZ, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 36 EAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 12th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [Petitions IV-2024-5; FRL-12205-01-R4]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of final order on petition.

# SUMMARY:

The EPA Administrator signed an order dated August 16, 2024, granting in part and denying in part the petition dated March 28, 2024, from Mobile Environmental Justice Action Coalition and Greater-Birmingham Alliance to Stop Pollution (GASP). The petition requested that EPA object to the Clean Air Act (CAA) title V operating permit issued by the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) to Epic Alabama Maritime Assets, LLC, Alabama Shipyard, LLC (Alabama Shipyard) for its facility located in Mobile, Mobile County, Alabama.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Art Hofmeister, Air Permits Section, EPA Region 4, (404) 562-9115,                         *hofmeister.art@epa.gov.*                         The final order and petition are available at:                         *https://www.epa.gov/​title-v-operating-permits/​title-v-petition-database.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

EPA received a petition from Mobile Environmental Justice Action Coalition and GASP dated March 28, 2024, requesting that EPA object to the issuance of operating permit no. 503-6001, issued by ADEM to Alabama Shipyard in Mobile, Mobile County, Alabama. On August 16, 2024, the EPA Administrator issued an order granting in part and denying in part the petition. The order itself explains the bases for EPA's decision. Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide that a petitioner may request review of those portions of an order that deny issues in a petition. Any petition for review shall be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit no later than November 15, 2024.

Dated: September 10, 2024.

Jeaneanne Gettle,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

[FR Doc. 2024-20925 Filed 9-13-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 10.2


 


UST Sequence Number: 16


 


COMERICA
INCORPORATED


 


WAIVER


 


In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my
employer’s participation in the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP
Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily waive any claim against the
United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or benefits
that are required to comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the
Treasury as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008.


 


I acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the
compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies
and agreements (including so-called “golden parachute” agreements) that I have
with my employer or in which I participate as they relate to the period the
United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired
through the TARP Capital Purchase Program.


 


This waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United
States or any state related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned
regulation, including without limitation a claim for any compensation or other
payments I would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by which this
regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of
these regulations on my employment relationship.


 


	
  Agreed to
  and acknowledged

  	
   

  
	
  as of the
  14th day of November, 2008:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Ralph W. Babb, Jr.

  	
   

  
	
  Ralph W. Babb, Jr.

  	
   

  
	
  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Elizabeth S. Acton

  	
   

  
	
  Elizabeth S. Acton

  	
   

  
	
  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Joseph J. Buttigieg, III

  	
   

  
	
  Joseph J. Buttigieg, III

  	
   

  
	
  Vice Chairman

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Dennis J. Mooradian

  	
   

  
	
  Dennis J. Mooradian

  	
   

  
	
  Executive Vice President

  	
   

  



 

















 


	
  /s/ Mary Constance Beck

  	
   

  
	
  Mary Constance Beck

  	
   

  
	
  Executive Vice President

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Dale E. Greene

  	
   

  
	
  Dale E. Greene

  	
   

  
	
  Executive Vice President
EXHIBIT 31.1 CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION I, Yuri
 Benenson, certify that:1.
I have
 reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trimol Group, Inc.2.
Based on my
 knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
 material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
 statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
 were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
 quarterly report;3.
Based on my
 knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
 in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
 financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
 as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
The
 registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
 and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
 Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant, and we have:a)
designed
 such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
 relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
 known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
 in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b)
evaluated
 the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as
 of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report
 (the Evaluation Date); andc)
presented in
 this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
 disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
 Evaluation Date;5.
The
 registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
 most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee
 of registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
 function):a)
all
 significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
 which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
 summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
 auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
any fraud,
 whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
 a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and6.
The
 registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
 report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or
 in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
 to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
 with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  May 15, 2008
By  /s/
 Yuri BenensonChief
 Executive Officer 20
Amended and Restated Commitment Letter



 Exhibit 10.2 
 SEQUOIA ENTERPRISES, L.P. 
 VESSEL PARTNERS, L.P. 
 November 10, 2008 
 BDO Seidman, LLP 
 Ladies and gentlemen: 
 In connection with BDO Seidman, LLP’s audit of
the consolidated financial statements of Diedrich Coffee, Inc. (the “Company”) as of and for the year ended June 25, 2008, Sequoia Enterprises, L.P. (“Sequoia”) and Vessel Partners, L.P. (“Vessel” and collectively
with Sequoia, the “Lenders”) make the following commitments. This letter amends, restates and supersedes the Lenders’ letter to you dated as of October 8, 2008. 
  

	 	1.	The Lenders commit to provide additional financial support to the Company on commercially acceptable terms not to exceed $5 million over the course of 18 months from the date of
this letter. Such amount will provide cash flow sufficient to operate the Company on a going concern basis during that period. 

  

	 	2.	To evidence the commitment in the paragraph above, the Lenders will enter into a $5 million commitment letter or note agreement with the Company as soon as possible and no later
than November 30, 2008. 

  

	 	3.	In addition to the above, Sequoia will also extend the maturity date on commercially acceptable terms on the $2 million note purchase agreement with the Company that is set to
expire on March 31, 2009. The maturity of the note will be extended to at least March 31, 2010. 

  

	 	4.	The Lenders will not require that the Company agree to any covenants more onerous than those presently existing in the agreements between the Company and Sequoia.


  

	 	5.	The Lenders have the intent and the ability to fully fund the financial commitments that are outlined in this letter. 

  

	 	6.	I have the authority as the General Partner of each of Sequoia Enterprises, L.P. and Vessel Partners, L.P. to make investment decisions and financial commitments outlined in this
letter. 

  

	 	7.	The Lenders’ commitments set forth in this letter shall immediately cease and terminate if the Company receives gross proceeds from any transaction of $5 million or more or
enters into a credit or loan agreement with a party other than the Lenders for at least $5 million. 

  

			
	Sincerely,	 	
		
	 /s/    Paul Heeschen
	 	
	Paul Heeschen	 	
	General Partner, Sequoia Enterprises, L.P.	 	
	General Partner, Vessel Partners, L.P.
#### STATE of Texas, Appellant, v. MUTUAL PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS et al., Appellees.

No. 7715.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

April 20, 1932.

James V. Allred, Atty. Gen., and Everett L. Looney, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

G. R. Lipscomb, of Fort Worth, W. J. Rutledge, Jr., of Dallas, and Weeks & Hanker-son, of Tyler, for appellees.

McClendon, o. j.

This cause is companion to No. 7720, State v. Texas Mutual Life Insurance Company of Texas (Tex. Civ. App.) 51 S.W.(2d) 405, this day decided. Appellee was’chartered April *&,*1906, the certificates issued by it are in denominations of $500, $1,000, and $1,100, and the dues and assessments are different in amounts from those in cause No. 7720'. In other respects the record showing does not differ in any material element from that in cause No. 7720. The opinion in that cause is referred to as controlling the issues involved in the instant appeal, and upon the authority of its holdings, the trial court’s judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 28, 2016

d1212

Order 

Clerk

December 28, 2016

153297 & (20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153297

COA: 330813

Kalamazoo CC: 2010-002000-FC

LONNIE HANEY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 29, 2016 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). The motion for judicial 

notice is DENIED.
Exhibit
21.1





ADDvantage
Technologies Group, Inc.





Subsidiaries








Tulsat
Corporation, an Oklahoma corporation





ADDvantage
Technologies Group of Missouri, Inc. (dba “ComTech Services”), a Missouri
corporation





ADDvantage
Technologies Group of Nebraska, Inc. (dba “Tulsat – Nebraska”), a Nebraska
corporation





ADDvantage
Technologies Group of Texas (dba “Tulsat – Texas”), a Texas
corporation





NCS
Industries, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation





Jones
Broadband International, Inc., a California corporation





Tulsat –
Atlanta LLC, a subsidiary of Tulsat, an Oklahoma corporation





Tulsat –
Pennsylvania LLC (dba “Broadband Remarketing International”), a subsidiary of
Tulsat, an Oklahoma corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           8,008
<SECURITIES>                                     9,135
<RECEIVABLES>                                      730
<ALLOWANCES>                                       122
<INVENTORY>                                      1,970
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,426
<PP&E>                                           9,008
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,802
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,651
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,652
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,651
<SALES>                                          4,755
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,755
<CGS>                                            4,832
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,702
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  59
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,630)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,630)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,630)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (7.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (7.74)


</TABLE>
[4910-13-P1

14 CFR Part 39

RlN 2120-AA64

Federal Aviation Administration

100 & 440), CL-600-2CIO (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702), CL-600-2DI5

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0223; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-IOS-AD; Amendme

Ir;,qo3 2-:5 -, L/

39-*****; AD ~OlO-**-**]

(Regional Jet Series 70S), and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes

(J I:; 10

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-28 19 (Regional Jet Series ~"UTI.GS\'MLlO~

IV -IOC'

$~;c.L

u~;'A'3.fio

'SGSYM9Ol.

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportatioil

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule. lo;c;SV ••fIOl.

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airwortbiness directive (AD) for the products list IAlS'SI()

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infonnation (MeAl) "TE

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and COlTcctan unsafe ~OlJ1'IN~SYMIl()L

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

Several cases of corrosion in lower structural members of the passenger

door have been reported. It was subsequently determined that a drainage

ramp (constructed from resin) had deteriorated with time and was

retaining moisture. * * * Corrosion left undetected could eventually

affect the structural integrity of the door and surrounding structure.

•.rnNQ S'"MIlOL

We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these

products.

AT~
(4910-13-P] CONCU""',NC"o;

ROlJTIN(; ,nlll<".

LGB-AEG

OErARTMENT OF TRANsrORT nON

Federal Aviation Administrat.ion

14 CFR rart 39

[Docket No.F AA-2010-0223; Directorate Identifier 2009RNM-l 05RADj Amendment

lUN 2120-AA64

Ainvorthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B 19 (Regional Jet Series

100 & 440), CL-600-2C I 0 (Regional Jet Series 700, 70 I & 702), CL-600-2D 15

(Regional Jet Series 705), and CLR600~2D24(Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT), ANE-170

ACTION: Final rule.

INIT","",""

ASoc' s

nA •

1M" 1,,1'1(' above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl)

SUMMARY; We are adopting'a new airwOlihiness directive (AD) for the products listed

ROUn G",'Mn ,.

V (D

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: ROlJTlNQ 5YMOOL

Several cases of corrosion in lowcr structural members of the passenger

door have been reported. It was subsequently detelmined that a drainage

ramp (constructed fromifesin) had deteriorated with time and was

retaining moisture. * >I< *Con-asion left undetected could eventually

affect the structural integrity of the door and surrounding structure.

C-,~

""'1 rv/"

"0UT1Nr. Syo",,)I.

'NITIA'-,I:SLG

We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these

"~TE

products.