Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [A-201-836]
 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
 SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube (LWRPT) from Mexico. We preliminarily determine that Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. (Maquilacero)/Tecnicas de Fluidos S.A. de C.V. (TEFLU) and Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V. (Perfiles) made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value 
                        ( print page 74917)
                        during the period of review (POR) August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
 DATES: Applicable September 13, 2024.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Conniff or Charles Doss, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1009 or (202) 482-4474, respectively.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On August 5, 2008, Commerce published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     the antidumping duty order on LWRPT from Mexico.[1]
                    
                     On October 18, 2023, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce published a notice of initiation for this administrative review.[2]
                    
                     On April 16, 2024, we extended the deadline for the preliminary results to August 30, 2024.[3]
                    
                     On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled the deadline in this administrative proceeding by seven days.[4]
                    
                     The deadline for the preliminary results is now September 6, 2024. For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this administrative review, 
                    *see*
                     the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.[5] Scope of the Order The products covered by the 
                    *Order*
                     are light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from Mexico. For a complete description of the scope, 
                    *see*
                     the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). We calculated export price in accordance with section 772 of the Act. We calculated normal value in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying these preliminary results, 
                    *see*
                     the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as an appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
                    *https://access.trade.gov.*
                     In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at
                    *https://access.trade.gov/​public/​FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.* Intent To Rescind, In Part Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is Commerce's practice to rescind an administrative review of an antidumping duty order where it determines that there were no suspended entries of subject merchandise during the POR.[6]
                    
                     Normally, upon completion of an administrative review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the antidumping duty assessment rate for the review period.[7]
                    
                     Therefore, for an administrative review to be conducted, there must be a suspended entry that Commerce can instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate at the calculated antidumping duty assessment rate for the review period.[8] As discussed in greater detail in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, the POR entry totals reflected in the data query provided by U.S. Customs Border Protection (CBP) in the Attachment of the CBP Data Memorandum reflected no POR entries of subject merchandise from: (1) Arco Metal S.A. de C.V.; (2) Fabricaciones y Servicios de Mexico; (3) Galvak, S.A. de C.V.; (4) Grupo Estructuras y Perfiles; (5) Industrias Monterrey S.A. de C.V.; (6) Internacional de Aceros, S.A. de C.V.; (7) PEASA-Productos Especializados de Acero; (8) Talleres Acero Rey S.A. de C.V.; (9) Tuberias Aspe S.A. de C.V.; (10) Tuberia Laguna, S.A. de C.V.; and (11) Tuberias y Derivados S.A. de C.V.[9] In the absence of any suspended entries of subject merchandise from these companies during the POR, Commerce hereby notifies all interested parties of its intent to rescind this administrative review with respect to these companies. Commerce is providing interested parties with an opportunity to submit comments on this preliminary decision, including factual information. Comments, including factual information, from interested parties are due to Commerce no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on September 13, 2024. Rebuttal comments, including rebuttal factual information, are due seven days thereafter, by 5:00 p.m. ET on September 20, 2024. All submissions must be filed electronically at 
                    *https://access.trade.gov*
                     in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303. Rate for Non-Examined Companies For the rate for companies not selected for individual examination in an administrative review, generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a less-than-fair-value investigation. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally “an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or 
                    *de minimis*
                     margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available}.” In this administrative review, we calculated weighted-average dumping margins for Perfiles and Maquilacero/TEFLU that are not zero, 
                    *de minimis,*
                     or based entirely on total facts available. For the respondents that were not selected for individual examination in this administrative review, we have assigned to them the 
                    ( print page 74918)
                    simple average of the weighted-average dumping margins calculated for Perfiles and Maquilacero/TEFLU, consistent with the guidance in section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act.[10] Preliminary Results of the Review Commerce preliminarily determines the following estimated weighted-average dumping margins exist for the POR: Producer/exporter
Weighted-
                             average 
                             dumping 
                             margin 
                             (percent)Maquilacero S.A. de C.V./Tecnicas de Fluidos S.A. de C.V.11
20.30Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V
6.66Aceros Cuatro Caminos S.A. de C.V./Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V.12
13.73Nacional de Acero S.A. de C.V
13.73Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S. de R.L. de C.V
13.73Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V
13.73
 Disclosure and Public Comment Commerce intends to disclose its calculations and analysis performed to interested parties for these preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs to Commerce no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.[13]
                    
                     Interested parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding must submit: (1) a table of contents listing each issue; and (2) a table of authorities.[14] As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior proceedings we have encouraged interested parties to provide an executive summary of their brief that should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. In this review, we instead request that interested parties provide at the beginning of their briefs a public, executive summary for each issue raised in their briefs.[15]
                    
                     Further, we request that interested parties limit their public executive summary of each issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. We intend to use the public executive summaries as the basis of the comment summaries included in the issues and decision memorandum that will accompany the final results in this administrative review. We request that interested parties include footnotes for relevant citations in the public executive summary of each issue. Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).[16] Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) the party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. An electronically filed hearing request must be received successfully in its entirety by Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. ET within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 41 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     in accordance with 19 CFR 356.8(a). If a timely summons is filed at the CIT, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (
                    *i.e.,*
                     within 90 days of publication). If the weighted-average dumping margin for Maquilacero/TEFLU or Perfiles is not zero or 
                    *de minimis*
                     (
                    *i.e.,*
                     less than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, we will calculate importer-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     assessment rates for the merchandise based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales made during the POR to each importer and the total entered value of those same sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where we do not have entered values for all U.S. sales to a particular importer, we will calculate an importer-specific, per-unit assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total quantity of those sales.[17]
                    
                     To determine whether an importer-specific, per-unit assessment rate is 
                    *de minimis,*
                     in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we also will calculate an importer-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     ratio based on estimated entered values. Where an importer-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     assessment rate is zero or 
                    *de minimis*
                     in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties, 
                    ( print page 74919)
                    in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or 
                    *de minimis*
                     in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP not to assess duties on any of its entries in accordance with the 
                    *Final Modification for Reviews, i.e.,*
                     “{w}here the weighted-average margin of dumping for the exporter is determined to be zero or 
                    *de minimis,*
                     no antidumping duties will be assessed.” [18]
                    
                     For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Maquilacero/TEFLU or Perfiles for which the producer did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company (or companies) involved in the transaction.[19] For the companies which were not selected for individual examination, we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties at an 
                    *ad valorem*
                     assessment rate equal to the company-specific weighted-average dumping margin determined in these final results. For the companies for which we intend to rescind the administrative review, upon issuance of the final results, antidumping duties shall be assessed at a rate equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for each company listed above will be that established in the final results of this administrative review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent, and therefore, 
                    *de minimis*
                     within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or in the investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be the all-others rate of 3.76 percent, the rate established in the investigation of this proceeding.[20]
                    
                     These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Final Results of Review Unless extended, we intend to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of our analysis of all issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    .[21] Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: September 6, 2024. Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
 Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the 
                        *Order* IV. Intent to Rescind Review, In Part V. Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination VI. Discussion of the Methodology VII. Currency Conversion VIII. Recommendation


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         
                        *See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico, the People's Republic of China and Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders; Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value,*73 FR 45403 (August 5, 2008) (
                        *Order*). Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         
                        *See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,*88 FR 71829 (October 18, 2023) (
                        *Initiation Notice*). Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,” dated April 16, 2024. Back to Citation
 4.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings,” dated July 22, 2024. Back to Citation
 5.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico; 2022-2023,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). Back to Citation
 6.
    
                         
                        *See, e.g., Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to Length Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany: Recission of Antidumping Administrative Review; 2020-2021,*88 FR 4157 (January 24, 2023). Back to Citation
 7.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Back to Citation
 8.
    
                         
                        *See, e.g., Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co.*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         380 F. Supp. 3d 1328, 1335-36 (CIT 2019), at 12 (referring to section 751(a) of the Act, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) held that: “While the statute does not explicitly require that an entry be suspended as a prerequisite for establishing entitlement to a review, it does explicitly state the determined rate will be used as the liquidation rate for the reviewed entries. This result can only obtain if the liquidation of entries has been suspended. . . ;” 
                        *see also Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019,*86 FR 36102 (July 8, 2021), and accompanying IDM at Comment 4; and 
                        *Solid Fertilizer Grade Ammonium Nitrate from the Russian Federation: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,*77 FR 65532 (October 29, 2012) (noting that “for an administrative review to be conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry to be liquidated at the newly calculated assessment rate”). Back to Citation
 9.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Release of Customs and Border Protection Data,” dated October 20, 2023 (CBP Data Memorandum). Back to Citation
 10.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Preliminary Decision Memorandum at “Companies Not Selected For Individual Examination;” 
                        *see also*
                         Memorandum, “Calculation of Non-Selected Rate in Preliminary Results,” dated concurrently with this notice; and 
                        *Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part,*75 FR 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010). Back to Citation
 11.
    
                         Commerce has previously found Maquilacero and TEFLU to comprise a single entity. 
                        *See, e.g., Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019,*86 FR 33646 (June 25, 2021), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (IDM) at Comment 9. 12.
    
                         Commerce has previously found Aceros Cuatro Caminos S.A. de C.V./Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V. to comprise a single entity. 
                        *See, e.g., Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016,*83 FR 10664 (March 12, 2018). Back to Citation
 13.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(d); 
                        *see also Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings,*88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (
                        *APO and Service Final Rule*). Back to Citation
 14.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). Back to Citation
 15.
    
                         We use the term “issue” here to describe an argument that Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Back to Citation
 16.
    
                         
                        *See APO and Service Final Rule.* Back to Citation
 17.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Back to Citation
 18.
    
                         
                        *See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification,*77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012) (
                        *Final Modification for Reviews*). Back to Citation
 19.
    
                         
                        *See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,*68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). Back to Citation
 20.
    
                         
                        *See Order,*
                         85 FR at 37423. Back to Citation
 21.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2024-20795 Filed 9-12-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P