alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2570 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2570

 To repeal the funding authorization sunset and the total funding cap 
                 for the Essex National Heritage Area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 19, 2018

Mr. Markey (for himself and Ms. Warren) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the funding authorization sunset and the total funding cap 
                 for the Essex National Heritage Area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESSEX NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA.

    (a) Repeal of Funding Authorization Sunset.--Section 507 of 
division II of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 
1996 (Public Law 104-333) is repealed.
    (b) Repeal of Total Funding Cap.--Section 508(a) of division II of 
the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 (Public Law 
104-333) is amended by striking the last sentence.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals Sa n Antonio, Texas

October 15, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00412

- CV

INTEREST OF L.A.C., A.I.A.C, S.A.C., H.A. C.,

From the 166th Judicial District Court
, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019PA00887 Honorable Linda A. Rodriguez , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights, which must be disposed of by this Court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. Appellee has filed a motion for exte nsion of time to file its brief

. Appellee’s motion is GRANTED, and a ppellee’ s brief is due on November 16, 2020

. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

c ourt on this 15th day of October, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ
, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>


                    D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
September 30, 2002 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G.
William Ruhl, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. [ss] 1350, as adopted pursuant to [ss] 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that based on my knowledge:


     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. [ss] 78m(a) or [ss]
78o(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




   /s/ G. William Ruhl
-----------------------------
Name:  G. William Ruhl
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 31, 2003



This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Amendement to Unit Purchase Option



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL 
 October 27, 2008 
 Nick Griffin 
 Chief Financial Officer 
 United
Insurance Holdings Corp. 
 700 Central Avenue, Suite 302 
 St.
Petersburg, FL 33701 
  

	 	Re:	 Unit Purchase Options 


 Dear Nick, 
 Consistent with my letter to Patrick Delacey of Raymond James & Associates dated August 1, 2008 and as further noted in FMG
Acquisition Corp.’s Proxy Statement/Prospectus dated September 4, 2008, this is to confirm that the underwriters of FMG’s initial public offering in October 2007 and certain of their employees which received 450,000 unit purchase
options in conjunction with FMG’s IPO have agreed to forfeit 100,000 of such options and to have expiration date for the remaining 350,000 unit purchase options be shortened by two years to October 4, 2010. 
 Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any questions at XXX-XXX-XXXX. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	PALI CAPITAL, INC.
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/  R. Michael Powell

		 	 R. Michael Powell

		 	 Managing Director
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: August 8, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ RICHARD L. KEISTER 
|                      |  |  |  | Richard L. Keister     
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of  Technoprises  Ltd.
(the  "Company")  for the  year  ended  December  31,  2003 as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  Adam Ofek,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certifies,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  sec.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to sec.  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.

Date: August 15, 2004                   /s/ Adam Ofek
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Adam Ofek
                                        President and Chief Financial Officer
CUSIP 069851 30 1
                            BASIC EMPIRE CORPORATION


              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELEWARE

                                                               SEE REVERSE FOR
                                  COMMON STOCK               CERTAIN DEFINITIONS



                                    SPECIMEN


This
certifies
that







is the owner of


 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF
                            BASIC EMPIRE CORPORATION


(hereinafter  called  the  "Corporation"),  transferable  on  the  books  of the
Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney,  upon
surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed.  This certificate and the shares
represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of
the Certificate of Incorporation  and the Bylaws of the Corporation,  as amended
(copies of which are on file at the  office of the  Transfer  Agent),  to all of
which  the  holder  of this  Certificate  by  acceptance  hereof  assents.  This
Certificate  is not valid unless  countersigned  and  registered by the Transfer
Agent and  Registrar.  Witness  the  facsmile  seal of the  Corporation  and the
facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.


DATE:


                            [CORPORATE SEAL OMITTED]



                               Countersigned:
PRESIDENT                                    SECURITIES TRANSFER CORPORATION
                                             P.O. Box 701629
                                             Dallas, TX 75370
                                          By:


SECRETARY                                    ___________________________________
                                             TRANSFER AGENT-AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**STEVEN RULE,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW,** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 495 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**

**the Order of the Commonwealth Court**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 7th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Al lowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2257

In Re: JOHN PAUL TURNER,

Appellant.

No. 97-2517

In Re: JOHN PAUL TURNER,

Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (MISC-97-48-R)

Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 3, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders imposing a

prefiling injunction and granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. In re: Turner, No. MISC-97-48-

R (W.D. Va. Sept. 12, 1997, and Oct. 24, 1997). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Linda Icenhauer

- Ramirez

1103 Nueces, Austin, Texas 78701

Phone: 512

- 477

- 7991 Fax: 512

- 477

- 3580

E

- Mail: ljir@aol.com 

## Attorney and

Counselor at La w

December 10 , 2015

Mr. Jeffrey Kyle, Clerk

Third Court of Appeals of Texas

P.O. Box 12547

Austin, Texas 78711

Re: State of Texas v. Ricardo Rodriguez Calderon

Court of Appeals Cause No. 03

- 15

- 00714

- CR

Trial C ourt Cause No. CR 14

- 0384 in t he 22nd District Court of Hays County, Texas

Dear Mr. Kyle :

This is to inform the court that I have been app ointed to represent the Appellant Ricardo

Rodriguez Calderon in this appeal. Attached is a copy of my appointment. Please put me down

as counsel of record in this cause and notify me of all further action in this case. Pursuant to

Tex.R.App.Proc. 6.2, please find below my contact information:

Linda Icenhauer

- Ramirez

Attorney at Law

1103 Nueces

Austin, Texas 78701

Phone: 512

- 477

- 7991

Fax: 512

- 477

-- 3580

E mail: ljir@aol.com

SBN: 10382944

If you need any further information from me, please contact me.

Sincerely,

/s/ Linda Icenhauer

- Ramirez

Linda Icenhauer

- Ramirez

cc: Ms. Jennifer Stalbaum , Asst. District Attorney

Hays County District Attorneys Office ACCEPTED

03-15-00714-CR

8180564

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

12/10/2015 1:58:57 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001013148
<NAME>                        XYBERNAUT CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                            520,779
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     236,315
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                     1,253,541
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                2,785,305
<PP&E>                            499,629
<DEPRECIATION>                    282,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4,153,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,243,316
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                     1,756,097
<COMMON>                          142,121
<OTHER-SE>                      1,012,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    4,153,770
<SALES>                           129,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  356,365
<CGS>                             169,588
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     169,588
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,511,304
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 24,916
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (2,299,611)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (2,337,111)
<DISCONTINUED>                 (2,337,111)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (2,299,611)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.18)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

JEFFREY E. PERELMAN, AND JEP 

MANAGEMENT, INC., AS EQUITABLE 

SUBROGEE OF JEFFREY E. 

PERELMAN 

 v. 

RAYMOND G. PERELMAN; DILWORTH 

PAXSON, LLP: JOSEPH JACOVINI; 

LAWRENCE MCMICHAEL; MARJORIE 

OBOD; RONALD PERELMAN; HAINES & 

ASSOCIATES; CLIFFORD E. HAINES; 

BUCKLEY, BRION, MCGUIRE, MORRIS 

& SOMMER LLP; ANDREW C. ECKERT; 

SIGMUND FLECK; GUNSTER, YOAKLEY 

& STEWART, P.A.; AND GEORGE S. 

LEMIEUX 

PETITION OF: DILWORTH PAXSON LLP, 

JOSEPH JACOVINI, LAWRENCE 

MCMICHAEL AND MARJORIE OBOD 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 65 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

and Application for Leave to File Reply Brief are DENIED. 

Justices Donohue and Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision 

of this matter.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA NO . DA 19 - 0202 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOHN SHANNON FINLEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until January 4 , 202 1 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 1 2020

12/01/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0202
[Cite as State v. Thomas , 2014-Ohio-2410.] 

# Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100749



## STATE OF OHIO

PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

vs.


## CHRISTOPHER THOMAS

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT



### JUDGMENT:

AFFIRMED

Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-10-535943-A

BEFORE: S. Gallagher, J., Celebrezze, P.J., and Stewart, J.

RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: June 5, 2014ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

Albert L. Purola 38298 Ridge Road Willoughby, OH 44094

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: T. Allan Regas Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Justice Center, 8th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, OH 44113SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J.:

{¶1} This is an accelerated appeal brought pursuant to App.R. 11.1 and

Loc.App.R. 11.1. Defendant Christopher Thomas appeals from the resentencing

mandated by this court’s decision in State v. Thomas , 197 Ohio App.3d 176,

2011-Ohio-6073, 966 N.E.2d 939 (8th Dist.) (“ Thomas I ”), reversing Thomas’s sentence

based on the failure to merge allied offenses of similar import. For the following

reasons, we affirm.

{¶2} The facts are undisputed.

Thomas’s convictions in [the underlying] case result[ed] from his inappropriate relationships with two of his students while he was employed as a teacher at a middle school. The two victims were females, aged fourteen and thirteen. Thomas had a sexual encounter with the younger girl. He also sent sexually-explicit electronic messages to the girls, and convinced the girls to take sexually-explicit photographs of themselves and to send those photographs to his cell phone; he then transferred the images to his computer.

Id. at ¶ 5.

{¶3} In the current appeal, Thomas claims that his appellate counsel was

ineffective in Thomas I and that there are insufficient facts to support his conviction

entered upon a no-contest plea. We find no merit to either argument. “Res judicata bars

the assertion of claims against a valid, final judgment of conviction that have been raised

or could have been raised on appeal. ” State v. Ketterer , 126 Ohio St.3d 448,

2010-Ohio-3831, 935 N.E.2d 9, ¶ 59, citing State v. Perry , 10 Ohio St.2d 175, 226

N.E.2d 104 (1967), paragraph nine of the syllabus. Thomas’s claims could have been

raised in Thomas I and any post-dispositive process available through his direct appeal,such as an application to reopen the appeal pursuant to App.R. 26(B). Thomas’s claims

are overruled.

{¶4} Finding no merit to Thomas’s two assigned errors, we affirm the decision of

the trial court.

It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed.

The court finds there were no reasonable grounds for this appeal.

It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the common
pleas court to carry this judgment into execution. Case remanded to the trial court for

execution of sentence.

A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of

the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

SEAN C. GALLAGHER, JUDGE

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., P.J., and MELODY J. STEWART, J., CONCUR
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,604
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,136
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,025
<PP&E>                                          56,260
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,648
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,750
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,036
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,943
<SALES>                                         27,224
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,836
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,358
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   502
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,686
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,535
<INCOME-TAX>                                       431
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,104
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,104
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0653 IN THE MATTER OF: H.M., A Youth. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 14, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 1 2022

11/01/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0653
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

__________________________________________________________________ No. DA 19

- 0372
STATE OF MONTANA,
Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.
MICKEY RODNEY PAYNE

, Defendant and Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________ ORDER

__________________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time,

and good cause app earing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension

of time to and including July 15, 2020 , within which to prepare, file,

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 15 2020

06/15/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0372
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 249 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 249

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2017

             Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To provide that the pueblo of Santa Clara may lease for 99 years 
            certain restricted land, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF PUEBLO OF SANTA CLARA LAND ELIGIBLE FOR 99-YEAR 
              LEASE.

    Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of August 9, 1955 
(commonly known as the ``Long-Term Leasing Act'') (25 U.S.C. 415(a)), 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Indians,,'' and inserting ``Indians,'';
            (2) by inserting ``Ohkay Owingeh pueblo,'' after 
        ``Cochiti,'';
            (3) by inserting ``the pueblo of Santa Clara,'' after 
        ``Pojoaque,'';
            (4) by striking ``the the lands'' and inserting ``the 
        land'';
            (5) by striking ``lands held in trust for the Pueblo of 
        Santa Clara,''; and
            (6) by striking ``lands held in trust for Ohkay Owingeh 
        Pueblo''.

            Passed the Senate May 8, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```