Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that thi s opinion should not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 30182 Su m m ar y Cal endar

M A U R E E N G R E E N E , P l a i n tiff-A p p ell a n t v. SM I LE COM M U N I TY ACTI ON AGE N CY; GER ALDI N E RU SS ELL; ST

. M A R T IN IB E R IALA FAY E T T E C O M M U N IT YA C T IO N A G E N C Y ; A L V IN W IL T Z ; A N T H O N YW IL T Z ; R O S A L IE S P E N C E R , D efen da n t s- A pp el l ees

A p p ea lf

rom the U n i tedS tates D i stri ct C ou rt f ort he W es t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 6: 08- M C

- 43

B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , C L E M E N T , an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es . P E R C U R IA M: * M aure en G r ee ne appeal s t he di st r i c tc our t ’ s deni alof herm ot i on t o s t ay. G r e e n e file dth e m o tio n s e e k in gp e r m is s io n fr o m th e d is tr ic t c o u r t t o fi l e s u it d e s p ite th e fa c t t h a t s h e h a s b e e n b a n n e dfr o m filin ga n yfu r th e rp le a d in g s in th e d is tr ic t c o u r t a b s e n t a u th o r iz a tio n fr o m aju d g e . G r e e n e w a s o r ig in a lly ban n ed becau se s h e conti n u ed to f i l e m eri t l ess l aw sui t s on si m i l ar fact s. United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Janua ry 6, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 30182

2 O ve r the l a st t w elve y ea rs, G r e e n e h a s b rou gh t a va ri etyof civilri gh ts
c l ai m s a ga i ns tnum e r o us e m pl o ye r s –t ho ughno ne has s urvive d t o t r i alo n t he
m e r i t s . I nde e d, G r e e ne ha s f i l e d a tl e as tt e n s uc h s ui t s i n f e de r alc o ur ta nd f

o ur i n st ate c ou rt
. T h e d i st ri ctcou rtsaid t h at G reene h as “ abu sed j u di ci alprocess , w a sted l i m i t ed j udi c i alr es our c es and has c os tt he num er ous par t i es s he has
s u e dth o u s a n d s o f d o ll a r s in u n n e c e s s a r ya t t o r n e y s ’ fe e s .” L ik e w is e , G r e e n e ’s
cu rren t ap p ea lh a s n o b a sis i n l a w or fact. Thi s i s no tt he f

i r s tt i m e G r e e ne ha s a ppe ar e d b e f o re thi s c o ur t
. Att he concl u si on of

one of h er sui t s i n 200 6, w e w arn ed G reene th at w e are au t h ori zed to im p o s e p e n a ltie s fo rv e x a tio u s a n dfr iv o lo u s a p p e a ls

. G ree n e v. F on t enot , 221 F
. A p p ’ x . 3 4 3 , 3 4 4 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 7 ) (p e r c u ria m ); see als o Cogh lan v. S t arkey , 852 F
. 2 d80 6 , 80 8 ( 5 th C i r. 19 8 8 ) (no ti n g th a t t h e cou rts o f ap p ea lh a ve au th ority to
com pelsancti on s su asp o n te , ev en w h ere n otrequ est ed by an a dv erse pa rt y or i m posedby the di st ri ctcourt)

. A t t h at t i m e, w e chose n ot t o i m pose a m on et ary pen al t y even t h ou gh i t w as l i kely w arran t ed. G iven G reene’ s c on t i n u ed m i suse o f t he c o ur t s , w e de c i de t hats uc h a c t i o n i s ne c e s s ar y. Eve n pro se l i t i ga nt s do
n ot h a ve “un restra i n ed l i cen se to p u rsu e totall y frivo l ou s ap p e a l s. ” C larkv. G ree n , 8 1 4 F .2 d2 2 1 , 2 2 3 (5 th C ir . 1 9 8 7 ). A c c o r d in g l y , G r e e n e ’ s a p p e a l is D IS M IS S E D a s fr iv o lo u s a n ds h e is O R D E R E D to PAYa sa n cti on i n the am ou n t of $1 0 5 to th e clerko f th i s cou rt. T h e cle r ko f th is co u r t a n dth e cle r k s o f a ll fe d e r a l d is tr ic t c o u r ts w ith in th is C i r c ui tar e D I R E C TE D t o r ef use t o f i l e a ny pro se c ivi lc om pl ai ntorappealby G r e e n e u n le s s s h e s u b m its p r o o f o f s a tis fa c tio n o f th is p e n a lty

. G r e e n e s h o u ld
r e v ie w a n yp e n d in ga p p e a ls to e n s u r e th a t t h e ya r e n o t fr iv o lo u s . SeeLove l lv. G ree r , 2 5 0 F .3 d7 4 0 , * 1 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) (u n p u b lis h e d).