Entec Services, Inc 16 D Commerce

Avenue Hueytown, Alabama

35023 Telephone: (205) 491-6676 Fax: (205) 491-6614

Results of the March

14, 2007 Compliance Emissions

Testing

on the DIFF Baghouse

Stack

at the Borai Brick Facility

in Union City, Oklahoma
Submitted to: Boral Brick P.O. Box 1178 Columbus, Georgia

31902 Attention: Mr. Frank

Porter

Entec Project

No. 27109 Completed By: Report Submitted:

April 11, 2007 Reviewed By:

Tom Lotz, Sr. Project Leader Technical

Services

Manager hereby certify to the best of my knowledge

all field sampling

and laboratory

analysis

performed for this report is authentic

and accurate.

It has been checked

for completeness

and accuracy,Boral Brick Table of Contents Section Paae No. Executive Summary Emissions

Summary Detailed Test Results Sampling Procedures Location of Test Ports Method 26A Sampling

Train instrument Sampling

Train Field Data Sheets Test Run No. 1 Test Run No. 2 Test Run No. 3 Control Room Production

Data Original Test Protocol Quality Control

/ Quality

Assurance

Procedures QA/QC Checklist Meter Orifice and Temperature

Check Sheet Fyrite Standardization Stratification Sheet Method 6C QA/QC Checklist Method 10 QA/QC Checklist 123711121314152025303342495051555657 Interference Checks Laboratory Analysis Gas Analyzer

Calibration

Data Analyzer Calibration

Error System Bias and Drift Calibration Gas Certificates Equipment Calibrations Nomenclature and Test Calculations 5860676870747988Executive Summary Boral Brick, located

in Union City, Oklahoma,

retained

Entec Services,

Inc. to perform emissions testing on the Kiln DIFF Baghouse

stack. Mr. Lynn Beane and Mr. Art Otero of Entec Services,

Inc. conducted

the testing on March 14, 2007.

Representing

Boral Brick was Mr. Frank Porter who coordinated

testing

with the control

room production activity. Mr. David Shultz,

Mrs. Donna

Lautzenhiser,

and Mrs. Hillary Mosley

of the Oklahoma Department

of Environmental

Quality

were on site to observe

the testing.
On March 13, 2007, during preliminary

evaluations,

it was determined

that the CO and SO2 levels

would

exceed

the expected

calibration

gas range.

Entec

made arrangements for an additional

set of calibration

gas that forced testing to be pushed

to the following

day. The new calibration

bottles arrived

the next day and we began testing
on March 14, 2007.

No difficulties

were encountered

in the field collection

or in the laboratory analysis

of the samples

by Entec Services,

Inc. personnel. The emissions

from the kiln are controlled

by a DIFF system.

The particulate

emissions test summaries

on the following

pages give a detailed

analysis

of each test run.Detailed Test

ResultsEntec Services, Inc. SOURCE OVERVIEW

SOURCE OWNER:
PLANT LOCATION: SOURCE(S) NAME(S): SOURCE(S) CONDITION: SOURCE(S) SHAPE: SOURCE PERMIT NUMBER:
TEST PERFORMED:
ADDITIONAL TEST REQUIREMENTS:
REFERENCE METHOD

TESTS:

PROJECT MANAGER Boral Brick Union City, Oklahoma
DIFF Baghouse

Stack Compliance Emissions

Testing Circular 2004-210-0 HCI, SO2, and CO with flow and moisture Subpart JJJJJ Brick MACT Sample Location Volumetric Flow Molecular Weight Moisture Content Sulfur Dioxide Carbon Monoxide HCI / HF EPA Method EPA Method EPA Method EPA Method EPA Method EPA Method EPA Method

2346C1026A
Mr. Tommy Lot.z, Jr. •ONMENTALANALYST•RO JEC'• LEA DE•tVt•-y

nnBean e ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST

ASSISTANT Mr. Art Otero OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: Mr. Frank Porter RULING AGENCY:
RULING AGENCY

REPRESENTATIVE:
RATES TESTS CONDUCTED: Oklahoma

Department

of Environmental

Quality
Mr. David Shultz, Mrs. Donna Lautzenhiser,

Mrs. Hillary Mosley 03/14/07
ENTEC PROJECT

NUMBER: 27109ENTEC Services,

Inc.
16-D Commerce Ave Hueytown Alabama 35023 INPUT TEST DATA
Client: Boral Brick Job No.:

27109 Source: DIFF Baghouse

Stack Data Input By:

Art Otero Field Data Run Number Test Date Time Test Run Began Ended Sampling Time Stack Area 'Barometric Pressure Stack Static Pressure Pitot Tube Correction

factor Meter Correction

Factor Meter Delta H @ •lozzle Diameter Symbol

PbarP•Cp
Y,•H(•Dn Meter Volume Vr, Meter Temperature t• Avg. Orifice Delta H Impingers Weight Gain (Moisture) Silica Gel Impinger Weight Gain (Moisture) Oxygen Concentration,

dry basis Carbon Dioxide Concentration,

dry basis Sulfur Dioxide Concentration,

dry basis Carbon Monoxide

Concentration,

dry basis Avg. Sq. Rt. of Delta P Stack Temperature Total Hydrogen

Chloride collected,

mg

&HWimp

Units

Military Time minutes Test Data

in. Hg in.

in. Hz0 inches dcf

t

2

3 03/14/07 03/14/07

03/14/07 1126-1232 6O 1300-1404 6O

1414-1517 6O
Ft .=

15.904

15.904

15.904 28.87 28.87

28.87

28.87 -0.23 0.84 0.986 1.800 0.375 52.614 71.5 F in. H20 grams -0.20 0.84 0.986 1.8OO 0.375 57.346 78.2 2.95 115.0 2.57 110.0

-0.25 0.84 0.986 1.800 0.375 56.777 80.9 2.85 123.0

AVERAGE

-0.23 0.84 0.986 1.800 0.375 55.579 76.9 2.79 116.0 grams 13.9

15.2

11.1

13.4 % 17.5

17.0

16.0

16.8 CO= %

3.0

4.0

4.0

3.7 SO2 ppm

28.4

20.4

31.1

26.64
ppm CO (sqrt AP)a,•

HCL 88.6 0.457 307.5 92.6 0.484 306.7 0.81 90.2

1.42 0.493 303.0 0.78 (in. H20) 1/2
Fmg 90.48 0.478 305.7 1.00

5Client: Boral Brick Job No.:

27109 Soume: DIFF Ba•lhouse Stack Data Input By: Art Otero Description Formulas

S]/mbol

Units

Calculated Data Run Number 2

3 AVERAGE Test Date 03/14/07

03/i4/07

03/14/07 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiti!i Time Began-Ended 1. Stack Pressure P•,r P;113.e 2. Meter Pressure Pt•r &tt 13.e 3. Standard Meter Volume 17.64*Y* (vmrrm)* (P•,x &H 113.6) '4a. Standard Volume of Water Vapor Condensed =o.0470e'w•m• 4b. Standard Volume of Water Collected in Silica Gel 5. Moisture Fraction 9. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, dry basis :0.04719•N,• =(V•,•=•) V•,.•=•))/(V,•=•)

V•,,i,= 0.32*(O•)÷ 0.44"{CO.•)+0.28*(100-(0z)-(CO•) 10. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, wet basis MZ(1-Bw=)÷IS.0*(B• 11. Average Stack Gas Velocity 12. Stack Gas Flow @ Stack Conditions

85.49'Cp*(sqrt AP)z•*SQRT((T=)

60*vs*A, 13. Stack Gas Flow @ Standard Conditions Q=*(T,•J'Fs),(ps/p 14. Stack Gas Flow @ Dry Standard Conditions Q,'(1-8•)*( T,•T,)*( Ps/P==| ,14b. Hydrogen Chloride concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. 15b. Hydrogen Chloride emissions, Ibs per hour :(0.01543*HCI.•)IQ=•

16. Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Gas Concentration =c•,, MW 385.1 10 16. Carbon Monoxide (CO) Gas Concentration =c=,, MW/385.1 10 21. Suffur Dioxide (SO•) Gas Concentration =csoz (:1=• so 21. Carbon Monoxide (CO) Gas Concentration =Coo O,• s2 22. Volume collected through nozzle =TJPs'[0.OO2eSS'V•=+

Vm*Y=Pm/Tntl!

Ps in. Hg 28.85

28.86

28.85

28,85 Pm in. Hg 29.06

29.09

29.08

29.08 V•,=) dscf 50.033

53.909

53.089

52.344 V.•==• scf 5.177

5,412

5.788

5.459 v,,=,=• scf 0.655

0.717

0.523

0.632 B• fraction

0.1044

0.1021

0.1063

0.1042 Me g/g-mole

29.180

29.320

29.280

29.260 Ms g/g-mole

28.013

28.164

28.081

28.086
v, ft/s 31.98

34.28

33.62

33.362 O, acrm 30,518

32,715

32,274

31,836 Q, scfm 20,238

21,824

21,425

21,162

• dscfm

18,125

19,597

19,148

18,957
HCLcs grldscf 4.379E-04

2.233E-04

2.354E-04

2.989E-04 HCl -Ibghr la$1hr

0.07

0.04

0.04

0.05 Cwz Ibs/dscf 4.73E-06

3.39E-06

5.17E-06

4.43E-06 C¢, Ibs/dscf 6.45E-06

6.56E-06

6.74E-06

6.58E-06 SOz-lblhr Ib/hr 5,14

3.99

8.94

5.02 CO-]bRir Ib/hr 7.01

7.71

7.74

7.49 V• acf 84.243

89.998

89.484

87.908 24. Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent 100*Vnl (60*v='A•*0)l

% 95.40

95.07

95.82

95.43

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Post Meter Odfice Cal. (EMC ALT-00S Yqa) y= iii•iiiiiiii::i!!::i::iii::iii•iiiiiii•

1.0376

1.0237

1.0196

1.0270 % Difference, (Calibration must be within 6% of original Y-factsr) !!i•iii!iliiiiiiii•ililiii!iiii!!!•iiiiiiiii•!•i

-4.16°/oSampling ProceduresP

roced u res The emission

rates were determined

using EPA Methods

1-4, 6C, 10 and 26A of CFR Title 40, Part 60, Appendix

A. The calibration

and quality assurance

procedures

of EPA CFR 40 Part 60 Appendix

A for all methods,

and the "Quality

Assurance

Handbook

for Air Pollution

Measurement

System"

Volume

III Stationary

Source-Specific

Methods
were followed

throughout

the duration

of the field and laboratory

testing.
The most current

revision

revised

for each method

(as described

in the Federal Register) was used. Stack Gas Volumetric

Flow The velocity

of the gas stream

was determined

according

to EPA Reference

Method

1 and 2 by reading

the instantaneous

velocity

head with an inclined

manometer

at each sampling point with a calibrated

S-type

pitot tube attached

adjacent

to the sample nozzle. The stack pressure

was measured

with the static side of an S-type pitot tube. A calibrated

pyrometer

was used to measure

stack temperature

at each sampling

point. Moisture Content The moisture

content

used for calculating

the gas stream

flow rate was determined

by weighing the amount

of condensed

moisture

collected

in the impingers

of the sampling train as described

in EPA Reference

Method

4. The moisture

collection

system

consists

of a series of impingers.

Ice is placed

around the impingers.

The•utlet

temperature

of•he

impingers

is monitored

and recorded throughout the duration

of the testing to verify the temperature

is below <68 o
Sulfur Dioxide

Method

6C A Western

Research

Model

721M SO2 (Method

6C) analyzer

provided

continuous analysis of SO2 in the gas stream.

The basic analytical

principle

involves

quantitative measurement of the absorption

of UV radiation

by SO2 molecules.

The analyzer

uses a single light source,

which emits an appropriate

wavelength,

illuminating

the sample

cell through which the sample

is continuously

passed.

Narrow-band

optical

filters are rotated through

the beam,

and the radiation

passed

through

the optical

filters and sample cell is detected

by a single photo-detector.

The signal pulses from the photo-detector are separated

by a multiplexor

into a measuring

channel

and a reference channel. A log ratio amplifier

computes

the logarithm

of the input signal ration, producing a signal that is proportional

to the SO2 concentration.

The dual-range analyzer has a digital readout,

as well as 0-10.0 V DC output terminals.

The full scale of the instrument

was set at 221 ppm.
Carbon Monoxide

Method

10 The CO emissions

were measured

using a Siemens

Ultramat

23 analyzer.

This monitor is a selective

non-dispersive

infrared

radiation

(NDIR) gas analyzer

that operates

on the infrared double-beam

alternating

light principle.

The full range for the CO component

of this instrument

throughout

the test period was 227 ppm. Sampling System Due to the new test requirements,

a stratification

test was determined.

It was found that the gas stream

was unstratified.

A single point was used to collect

the gas samples. Samples

were extracted

from the gas stream

by a heated

stainless

steel probe maintained

at a set temperature

of 250 degrees

Fahrenheit,

through

a ten (10) foot heated

sample

line that was heated

to a temperature

between

225 and 250 degrees, through

a chilled sample

conditioner

to remove

the moisture

in the gas stream and transported

to the test trailer through

unheated

teflon sample

lines to the analyzers.
Data Acquisition Concentration

values

were collected

using a STRATA

data acquisition

system.

The data was recorded

every fifteen-seconds

and then averaged

for each sixty-second interval. Each minute

average

was then averaged

for the duration

of each test run. During all testing,

the unit was operating

within normal

operating

parameters;

at a range appropriate in accordance

with applicable

permits. Hydrogen Chloride

Method

26A (HCI) Preliminary data was used to determine

stack temperature,

pressure,

and range of velocity heads,

moisture

content

and stack gas dry molecular

weight prior to sampling. The meter box was leak checked

from the pump to the orifice.

Initial and final leak checks of the sampling

system

and pitot lines were performed

as outlined

in Method

5 and were recorded

on the data sheets.

The nozzle

(glass with an angle of taper of 30degrees and of button hook design)

was calibrated

before and after the test using a micrometer and was recorded

on the field data sheets.
The sampling

probe was placed at each sampling

point to provide

a total sampling

time of sixty (60) minutes.

The gases were drawn through

a glass nozzle attached

to a heated glass lined probe.

The probe was maintained

at the proper settings

to obtain an exit temperature

of greater

than 2480 F during sampling.

The gases then proceeded through borosilicate

glass filter holder,

with a Teflon frit filter support

through

a Teflon filter to remove

particulate

matter.

The filter was maintained

at a temperature

of greater than 248 0 F. These temperatures

were recorded

at each point on the field data sheets. The gases were then scrubbed

through

a series of four pre-weighed

impingers

to capture hydrogen

halides

and halogens

and moisture.

(The optional

first impinger

for a knockout for moisture

was not used.)

The first and second

impingers

contained approximately 100 ml of a 0.1N H2SO4

(acid) solution

and the third and fourth impingers contained approximately

100 ml of a 0.1 N NaOH (alkaline)

solution.

The fifth impinger contained pre weighed

silica gel to remove

any remaining

moisture.

The gases pass through the impinger

series in an ice bath to maintain

a maximum

exit temperature

of 68 0 F. This temperature

was also recorded

on the data sheets.

The clean and cool gases then entered

the meter box where the gas flow and temperature

were measured. After the completion

of the test the sampling

train and the probe nozzle assembly

was transferred to the cleanup

area making

sure no particulate

was lost. The cleanup

data wa•recorded.
The first and second

impinger

contents

were transferred

to its tared container,

weighed and the rinsing from the glassware

were added to this container.

The third and fourth impinger was transferred

to its respective

tared container,

weighed

and the rinsing from the glassware

was added to this container.

The silica gel from the fifth impinger

was transferred to its respective

tared container

and weighed.

A blank of the sulfuric

acid solution, sodium

hydroxide,

distilled

water and acetone

was taken. These containers
were clearly marked

and transported

to the laboratory

for analysis.Entec Services,

Inc 16 D Commerce

Ave. Hue•own

AL 35023 STACK DRAWING

& TRAVERSE

POINT LOCATION Client: Boral Brick Job No. 27109 Source: DIFF Baghouse

Stack Input By: Art Otero Type of Traverse: Velocity (V) or Particulate

(P):

P

Port Type

Nipple

Port Diameter

4.0" Stack Diameter, inches:

54 Stack Area, Ft2: 15.904 Stack Height, feat:

75 Number of Ports: 2 Stack Properties:

Inches

Duct Diameters

Length of Port, inches: 6.00 Upstream Disturbance:

222.0

4.11

Total Number of Traverse Points:

12 Downstream Disturbance:

387.0

7.17

Number of Points per diameter: 6 54.0 •NCHES

222.¢

NCHES

Point N•

Inside Stack

Outside Nipple Inches Inches 1 2.4 8.4 2 7.9 13.9 3 16.0 22.0 4 38.0 44.0 5 46.1 52.1 6 51.6 57.6

Adjusted points diameter > 24" no point closer than 1.0 inch Adjusted points diameter < 24" no point closer than 0.5 inch
Stack Diameters between 12-24 inches minimum points are 8 4 points per po•t if the 812 diameters downstream

and upstream criteria is met. 387.0 INCHES

3.1Method 26A

Sampling Train

(<68 F)

Te•ePn•rTe 1.0•l

#3

#4 t•SO 4aO[

•IaO[

liea G

Exhaust •O

O • • • O[

Controllers
Temperature

Pressure Dry Gas Meter

12Instrument Sampling Train

Three Way Valve Calibration

Gas Line

Heated'Teflon Line In-stack Filter Heated

• S•iniess Steel Probe

RemOval Sy•t•em Communication

Lines

Data Acquisition System

Flow Control Panet0000000

SO=CO

AiP Sampling Analyzem

Calibrati°n GasesEN TEC

Services

Pollution Control System Evaluation

and Source Emissions

Testing Boral Brick Union City,

Oklahoma

Compliance Emissions

Testing DIFF Baghouse

Stack

HCI,-SO2,

arid CO

March 44, 2007 Entec Project

No.: 27109

16-D Commerce

Avenue

Hueytown,

Alabama

35023 Phone: (205) 491-6676

Fax (205) 491-6614 www.entecservices.comExecutive Summary Boral Brick, located

in Union .City, Oklahoma,

retained

Entec Services,

Inc. to perform emissions testing on the Kiln DIFF Baghouse

stack. Mr. Lynn Beane and Mr. Art Otero of Entec Services,

Inc. conducted

the testing

on March 14, 2007.

Representing

Boral Brick was Mr. Frank Porter who coordinated

testing

with the control

room production activity. Mr. David Shultz,

Mrs. Donna

Lautzenhiser,

and Mrs. Hillary Mosley

of the Oklahoma Department

of Environmental

Quality

were on site to observe

the testing.
On March 13, 2007, during preliminary

evaluations,

it was determined

that the CO and SO2 levels

would

exceed

the expected

calibration

gas range.

Entec

made arrangements for an additional

set of calibration

gas that forced testing to be pushed

to the following

day. The new calibration

bottles arrived

the next day and we began testing on March

14, 2007.

No difficulties

were encountered

in the field collection

or in the laboratory analysis

of the samples

by Entec Services,

Inc. personnel. The emissions

from the kiln are controlled

by a DIFF system.

The particulate

emissions test summaries

on the following

pages give a detailed

analysis

of each test run.•ed TestEntec Services, Inc. SOURCE OVERVIEW

SOURCE OWNER:
PLANT LOCATION: SOURCE(S) NAME(S): SOURCE(S) CONDITION: SOURCE(S) SHAPE: SOURCE PERMIT

NUMBER: TEST PERFORMED: ADDITIONAL TEST REQUIREMENTS: REFERENCE METHOD

TESTS: Boral Brick -Union City, Oklahoma
DIFF Baghouse

Stack Compliance Emissions

Testing Circular 2004-210-C HCI, SO2, and CO with flow and moisture Subpart JJJJJ Brick MACT Sample Location EPA Method

1 Volumetric Flow

EPA Method

2 Molecular Weight

EPA Method

3 Moisture Content

EPA Method

4 Sulfur Dioxide EPA Method

6C Carbon Monoxide EPA Method

10 HCI / HF EPA Method

26A PROJECT MANAGER Mr. Tommy Lotz, Jr. •MENTAL•U•d.YS3"•_ Eynn-Beane ENVIRONMENTAL.ANALYST ASSISTANT Mr. Art Otero OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: Mr. Frank Porter RULING AGENCY: RULING AGENCY

REPRESENTATIVE: •ATES TESTS CONDUCTED: Oklahoma

Department

of Environmental

Quality
Mr. David Shultz, Mrs. Donna Lautzenhiser,

Mrs. Hillary Mosley 03/14/07 ENTEC PROJECT

NUMBER: 27109ENTEC Services,

Inc.
16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown0 Alabama 35023 INPUT TEST DATA
Client:

Job No.:

27109 Source: Data Input By:

Art Otero

Run Number Test Date Time Test Run Began Ended Sampling Time Stack Area Barometric Pressure Stack Static Pressure Pitot Tube Correction

factor Meter Correction

Factor Meter Delta H @ •lozzle Diameter Meter Volume Meter Temperature Avg. Orifice Delta H Impingers Weight Gain (Moisture) Silica Gel Impinger Weight Gain (Moisture) Oxygen Concentration,

dry basis Carbon Dioxide Concentration,

dry basis Sulfur Dioxide Concentration,

dry basis 'Carbon Monoxide

Concentration,

dry basis Avg. Sq. Rt. of Delta P Stack Temperature Total Hydrogen

Chloride collected,

mg Boral Brick DIFF Baghouse

Stack Field Data

Symbol

PMrP•C•,
Y&H@D.

,•H

O2COz SO2CO (sqrt •)=v•

HGL

Units

Military Time minutes Ft in. Hg in. Hz0

in. H20

03/14/07 1126-1232 6O 15.904 28.87 -0.23 0.84 0.986 1.800

03/14/07 1300-1404 6O 15.904 28.87 -0.20 0.84 0.986 1.800 Test Data
03/14/07 1414-1517 6O 15.904 28.87 -0.25 0.84 0.986 1.800

AVERAGE !iiilliiiiiiillii!i

28.87

0.986 1.800 inches 0.375

0.375

0.375

0.375 dcf 52.614

57.346

56.777

55.579

in. H20 grams
grams

71.5 2.57

78.2 2.95

80.9 2.85

76.9 2.79 110.0 115.0

123.0

116.0 13.9 15.2

11.1

13.4 17.0 17.53.028.4 88.6 0,457 307.5 1.42 4.020.4 90.2 0.493

16.04.0.31.1 92.6 0.484 306.7 0.81 ppm
ppm (in. H20) 112
Fmg

303.0 0.78 16.83.7 26.64 90.48 0.478 305.7 1.00

5ENTEC Services,

Inc. 16-D Commerce Ave. Hue/town PJabama 35023 CALCULA'IED TEST DATA
Client: Boral Brick Job No.:

27109 Source: DIFF Ba•lhouse Stack Data IrLout By: Art Otero Description Formulas

Symbol

Units

Calcu:•:•. 2

3 Run Number AVERAGE Test Date 03114/07

03/14/07

03/14/07

• Time Began-Ended Military'rime

1126-1232

1300-1404

1414-1517 1. Stack Pressure P=w÷ Pal 13.( P, in. Hg 28.85

28.86

28.85

28.85 2. Meter Pressure P• &H 113.( P• in, Hg 29.06

29.09

29.08

29.08 3. Standard Meter Volume 17.64*Y*(V•)Tm)°

(P• &H 113.6 V,•,=

dscf 50.033

53.909

53.089

52.344 4a. Standard Volume of Water Vapor Condensed =0,0470¢'w•

v,•,•

scf 5.177

5.412

5.788

5,459 4b. Standard Volume of Water Collected in Silica Gel =o.0471•'W=•

u..;_,

scf 0.655

0.717

0,523

0.632 5. Moisture Fraction =(V.•.• V.,==a)p(V.,•==

v•..• V,,•==) I], fraction

0.1044

0.1021

0.1063

0.1042 9. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, dw basis

0.32"(0•)* 0.44"(c0•.0.28"(1oo-(0zHc0.#,

I• g/g-mole

29.180

29.320

29.280

29.260 10. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, wet basis I•*(1-B,•p18.0=(B•=]

IV• g/g-mole

28.013

28.164

28.081

28 086 11. Average Stack Gas Velocity 85.4s'c=*(sqrt •)•*SQRT((T,)

(Ps*M.)] v= ff/s 31.98

34.28

33.82

33.362 12. Stack Gas Flow @ Stack Conditions S0"v='A, •, acfm 30,518

32,715

32,274

31,836 13. Stack Gas Flow @ Standard Conditions Q,*(T=a•T,)=(P=/P•)

Q= scfm 20,238

21,824

21,425

21,162 14. Stack Gas Flow @ DW Standard Conditions Qa=(1-B•)*(T•I',)°(P#P=•)

Q• dscfm 18,125

19,597

19,148

18,957 14b. Hydrogen Chloride concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. =(0.O1543•1C•|/Q==

HCLcs gr/dscf 4.379E-04

2.233E-04

2.354E-04

2.989E-04 15b. Hydrogen Chloride emissions. Ibs per hour

=(sor/o0o)-Hm q.•*o,,• HC1.4b•h•"

Jbs/hr

0.07

0.04

0.04

0.05 16. Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Gas Concentration =c== MW1385.1 x1¢ c,• tbs/d"=cf 4.73E-06

3.39E-06

5.17E-06

4.43E-06 16. Carbon Monoxide (CO) Gas Concentration =c=., MWl385.1 xl0• C• Ibs/dscf 6.45E-06

6.56E-06

6.74E-06

6.58E-06 21. Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Gas Concentration =c=oz Q,•* 8¢ soz4u/l=r

Ib/•r

5.14

3.99

5.94

5.02 21. Cadoon Monoxide (CO) Gas Concentration --coo Q,•- 8•. CO-•b•"

It•r 7.01

7.71

7.74

7.49 22. Volume collected through nozzlo =TJP,'[0.002669"V•=+

Vm'Y'P.ff.,]

V. acf 84,243

89.998

89.484

87.908 24. Iso•inetic Sampling Rate, Percent too*vnl (6o'v,-•*e)

% 95.40

95.07

95.82

95.43

"Oat Meter Odtloe Cal, (EMC ALT-009 Yq.) iiiii •iii ::i•i• •i/[liiiii::] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ..'..:•.•..•.

..'..E•t.,'......,....J

..'.:•.'.•ENTEC Services

Pollution Control System Evaluation

and Source Emissions

Testing Borai Brick Union City,

Oklahoma

Compliance Emissions

Testing DIFF Baghouse

Stack

HCI, S02, and CO

March 14, 2007 Entec Project

No.: 27109

16-D Commerce

Avenue

Hueytown,

Alabama

35023 Phone: (205) 49t.6676

Fax (205) 491-6614 Hfww.entecservices.cornEntec Services, Inc. 16 D Commerce

Avenue Hueytown, Alabama

35023 Telephone: (205) 491-6676 Fax: (205) 491-6614

Results of the March

14, 2007 Compliance Emissions

Testing

on the DIFF Baghouse

Stack

at the Boral Brick Facility

in Union City, Oklahoma
Submitted to: Boral Brick P.O. Box 1178 Columbus, Georgia

31902 Attention: Mr. Frank

Porter

Entec Project

No. 27109 Completed By: Report

Submitted:

April 11, 2007 Reviewed By:

Lynn Beane Project Leader Tom Lotz, Sr. Technical Services

Manager hereby certiCy to the best of my knowledge

all field sampling

and laboratory

analysis

performed for this report is authentic

and accurate.

It has been checked

for completeness

and accuracy.Boral Brick Table of Contents Section Executive Summary Emissions

Summary Detailed Test Results Sampling Procedures Location of Test Ports Method 26A Sampling

Train Instrument Sampling

Train Field Data Sheets Test Run No. 1 Test Run No. 2 Test Run No. 3 Control Room Production

Data Original Test Protocol Quality Control

i Quality

Assurance

Procedures QA/QC Checklist Meter Orifice and Temperature

Check Sheet Fyrite Standardization Stratification Sheet Method 6C QA/QC Checklist Method 10 QA/QC Checklist Pa_qe No. 123711121314152025303342495051555657 Interference Checks Laboratory Analysis Gas Analyzer

Calibration

Data Analyzer Calibration

Error System Bias and Drift Calibration Gas Certificates Equipment Calibrations Nomenclature and Test Calculations 5860676870747988Executive Summarv Boral Brick, located

in Union City, Oklahoma,

retained

Entec Services,

Inc. to perform emissions testing on the Kiln DIFF Baghouse

stack. Mr. Lynn Beane and Mr. Art Otero of Entec Services,

Inc. conducted

the testing on March 14, 2007.

Representing

Boral Brick was Mr. Frank Porter who coordinated

testing

with the control

room production activity. Mr. David Shultz,

Mrs. Donna

Lautzenhiser,

and Mrs. Hillary Mosley

of the Oklahoma Department

of Environmental

Quality

were on site to observe

the testing.
On March 13, 2007, during preliminary

evaluations,

it was determined

that the CO and SO2 levels

would

exceed

the expected

calibration

gas range.

Entec

made arrangements for an additional

set of calibration

gas that forced testing to be pushed

to the following

day. The new calibration

bottles arrived

the next day and we began testing
on March 14, 2007.

No difficulties

were encountered

in the field collection

or in the laboratory analysis

of the samples

by Entec Services,

Inc. personnel. The emissions

from the kiln are controlled

by a DIFF system.

The particulate

emissions test summaries

on the following

pages give a detailed

analysis

of each test run.Detailed Test

R,es

!Entec Services, Inc. SOURCE OVERVIEW

SOURCE OWNER:
PLANT LOCATION: SOURCE(S) NAME(S): SOURCE(S) CONDITION: SOURCE(S) SHAPE: SOURCE PERMIT NUMBER: TEST PERFORMED: ADDITIONAL TEST REQUIREMENTS: REFERENCE METHOD

TESTS:

PROJECT MANAGER ••T•-PROJECT "^ n,-,• ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST

ASSISTANT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: RULING AGENCY: RULING AGENCY

REPRESENTATIVE: •ATES TESTS CONDUCTED:
ENTEC PROJECT

NUMBER: Boral Brick Union City, Oklahoma
DIFF Baghouse

Stack Compliance Emissions

Testing Circular 2004-210-C HCI, SO2, and CO with flow and moisture Subpart JJJJJ Brick MACT Sample Location EPA Method

1 Volumetric Flow

EPA Method

2 Molecular Weight

EPA Method

3 Moisture Content

EPA Method

4 Sulfur Dioxide. EPA Method

6C Carbon Monoxide EPA Method

10 HCI / HF EPA Method

26A
Mr. Tommy Lotz, Jr.
Mrs. EynnBeane
Mr. Art Otero
Mr. Frank Porter Oklahoma Department

of Environmental

Quality
Mr. David Shultz, Mrs. Donna Lautzenhiser,

Mrs. Hillary Mosley 03/14/07
27109ENTEC Services,

Inc.
16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown ,•!•_b_•ma 35023 INPUT TEST DATA Client: Boral Brick Job No.:

27109 Source: DIFF Baghouse

Stack Data Input By:

Art Otero Field Data

Symbol Run Number Units Test Data 1 2

3

AVERAGE Test Date Time Test Run Began Ended Sampling Time Stack Area Barometric Pressure Stack Static Pressure Pitot Tube Correction

factor Meter Correction

Factor Meter Delta H @ •ozzle Diameter Meter Volume Meter Temperature Avg. Orifice Delta H Impingers Weight Gain (Moisture) Silica Gel Impinger Weight Gain (Moisture) Oxygen Concentration,

dry basis Carbon Dioxide Concentration,

dry basis Sulfur Dioxide Concentration,

dry basis Carbon Monoxide

Concentration,

dry basis Avg. Sq. Rt. of Delta P Stack Temperature Total Hydrogen

Chlodde collected,

m 9

Pba¢
C•,
Y Milita W "lime minutes Ft in. Hg in. H•O

03/14/07 1126-1232 6O 15.904 28.87 -0.23 0.84 0.986 1.800

03/14/07 1300-1404 6O 15.904 28.87 -0.20 0.84 0.986 1.800

03/14/07 1414-1517 6O 15.904 28.87 -0.25
0,986 1.800 D. inches

0.375

0.375

0.375 Vm dcf

52.614

57.346

56.777 71.5 78.2

80.9 2.57 2.95

2.85 110.0 115.0

123.0 13.9 15.2

11.1 17.53,028.4 88.6 0.457 307.5 1.42 °F in. H=0 grams grams

ppm ppm (in. Hz0) 112
F 17.04,020.4 90.2 0.493 303.0 0.78 CO= SO2CO (sqrt Z•P)•va t•HCL

mg 28.87 -0.23 0.84 0.986 1.800 0.375 55.579 76.9 2.79 116.0 13.4 16.0 16.8 4.0 3.7 31.1 92.6 0.484 306.7 0.81 26.64 90.48 0.478 305.7 1.0016-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown• Alabama

Cflont: Boral Brick Job No.:

27109 Source: DIFF Bat/house Stack Data Input By: Art Otero Description Formulas

S•/mbol

Units

Ca•c,l=h=•i Data Run Number Test Date Time Began-Ended 1. Stack Pressure 2. Meter Pressure 3. Standard Meter Volume 17.64" Y= (vmrl'•)" (Pa,• tJt 113.6] V,•,• 4a. Standard Volume of Water Vapor Condensed :0.04706"Ww 4b. Standard Volume of Water Collected in Silica Gel 5. Moisture Fraction 9. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, dry basis 10. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, wet basis 11. Average Stack Gas Velocity 85.49•;p'(sqrt ,•P)=,•'SQRT((T,)

(P,*Mw|)j

in. Hg
dscf
scfscf
g/g-mole g/g-mole ft/s 3 AVERAGE 03114/07 03/14107

03/14/07 1126-1232 1300-1404

1414-1517 28.85 28.86

28.85

28.85 29.06 29.09

29.08

29.08 50.033 53.909

53.089

52.344 5.177 5.412

5.788

5.459 0.655 0.717

0.523

0.632 0.1044 0.1021

0.1063

0.1042 29.180 29.320

29.280

29.260 28.081 28.086 28.013 28.164 31.98 34.28

33.82

33.362 12. Stack Gas Flow @ Stack Conditions 60"%',• •, ac• 30,518

32,715

32,274

31,836 13. Stack Gas Flow @ Standard Cunditions Q,'(T,•,,K,}-(PJP=•]

Q, scrm 20,238

21,824

21,425

21,162 14. Stack Gas Flow @ Dry Standard Conditions Q,'(1-B•)*(T•#T=J*(P=/P=•)

o•

18 125 19 597 19 148 18 957 14b. Hydrogen Chlodde concentration @ Std.Cond..Grains/Cu.FL =(0.01543-HCI.•)IQ•

HCLcs grldscf 4.379E-04

2.233E-04

2.354E-04

2.989E-04 15b. Hydrogen Chlodde emissions, Ibs per hour

=(60/7000)°HCLQ•e°Q=d

HCl -Ib•hr Ibs/hr

0.07

0.04

0.04

0.05 16 Sulfur Dmxide (S02) Gas Concentration =c MW1385 10 •==° • Ibs/dscf 4.73E-06

3.39E-06

5.17E-06

4.43E-06 t16. Carbon Monoxide (CO) Gas Concentration ---c•,• MW 1385.1 10 C• Ibs/dscf 6.45E-06

6.56E-06

6.74E-06

6 58E-06 12 Sulfur Dmx•de (SO•) Gas Concen•ation ---c•oz" Q=,•* SO SOz4b/hr

Ib•r

5.14

3.99

5.94

5.02 21. Carbon Monoxide (CO) Gas Concentration =Coo O,•* 62:• CO-•b•hr

Ib/hr

7.01

7.71

7.74

7.49 122. Volume collected through nozzle =TJPs'[O.00266S"V•¢+

v,'Y,P,rr=]

v, acf 84.243

89.998

89.484

87.9O8 24. Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent 100"Vn/(S0°v=OA,,*e) % 95.40

95.07

95.82

95.43

% Diffare•ce, (Callbfatiot• must be within § • Of original Y-i•actor) •::::•::•::•::•::•::i•::::::::::•i•::•::•::•::::::•:::•::::::•::•::::::::::•i•i::•::•::•::::•::•i•::•::::::::•:•:•::::::•::::::::•::•::•::•::•::•::•::•::::; .4.16%Procedures The

emission

rates were determined

using EPA Methods

1-4, 6C, 10 and 26A of CFR Title 40, Part 60, Appendix

A. The calibration

and quality assurance

procedures

of EPA CFR 40 Part 60 Appendix

A for all methods,

and the "Quality

Assurance

Handbook

for Air Pollution

Measurement

System"

Volume

III Stationary

Source-Specific

Methods were followed

throughout

the duration

of the field and laboratory

testing. The most current

revision

revised

for each method

(as described

in the Federal Register) was used. Stack Gas Volumetric

Flow The velocity

of the gas stream

was determined

according

to EPA Reference

Method

1 and 2 by reading

the instantaneous

velocity

head with an inclined

manometer

at each sampling point with a calibrated

S-type

pitot tube attached

adjacent

to the sample nozzle. The stack pressure

was measured

with the static side of an S-type pitot tube. A calibrated

pyrometer

was used to measure

stack temperature

at each sampling

point. Moisture Content The moisture

content

used for calculating

the gas stream

flow rate was determined

by weighing the amount

of condensed

moisture

collected

in the impingers

of the sampling train as described

in EPA Reference

Method

4. The moisture

collection

system

consists

of a series of impingers.

Ice is placed

around the•mpingers. The outlet temperature

of the impingers

is•monitored

and recorded throughout the duration

of the testing to verify the temperature

is below <68 o
Sulfur Dioxide

Method

6C A Western

Research

Model

721M SO2 (Method

6C) analyzer

provided

continuous analysis of SO2 in the gas stream.

The basic analytical

principle

involves

quantitative measurement of the absorption

of UV radiation

by SO2 molecules.

The analyzer

uses a single light source,

which emits an appropriate

wavelength,

illuminating

the sample

cell through which the sample

is continuously

passed.

Narrow-band

optical

filters are rotated through

the beam,

and the radiation

passed

through

the optical

filters and sample cell is detected

by a single photo-detector.

The signal pulses

from the photo-detector are separated

by a multiplexor

into a measuring

channel

and a reference channel. A log ratio amplifier

computes

the logarithm

of the input signal ration, producing a signal that is proportional

to the SO2 concentration.

The dual-range analyzer has a digital readout,

as well as 0-10.0 V DC output terminals.

The full scale of the instrument

was set at 221 ppm.
Carbon Monoxide

Method

10 The CO emissions

w•re measured

using a Siemens

Ultramat

23 analyzer.

This monitor is a selective

non-dispersive

infrared

radiation

(NDIR) gas analyzer

that operates

on the infrared double-beam

alternating

light principle.

The full range for the CO component

of this instrument

throughout

the test period was 227 ppm. Sampling System Due to the new test requirements,

a stratification

test was determined.

It was found that the gas stream

was unstratified.

A single point was used to collect

the gas samples. Samples

were extracted

from the .gas stream

by a heated

stainless

steel probe maintained

at a set temperature

of 250 degrees

Fahrenheit,

through

a ten (10) foot heated

sample

line that was heated

to a temperature

between

225 and 250 degrees, through

a chilled sample

conditioner

to remove

the moisture

in the gas stream and transported

to the test trailer through

unheated

teflon sample

lines to the analyzers.

Data Acquisition Concentration

values

were collected

using a STRATA

data acquisition

system.

The data wamrecorded

every fifteen-seconds

and•hen

averaged

for each sixty-second interval. Each minute

average

was then averaged

for the duration

of each test run. During all testing,

the unit was operating

within normal

operating

parameters;

at a range appropriate in accordance

with applicable

permits. Hydrogen Chloride

Method

26A (HCI) Preliminary data was used to determine

stack temperature,

pressure,

and range of velocity heads,

moisture

content

and stack gas dry molecular

weight

prior to sampling. The meter box was leak checked

from the pump to the orifice.

Initial and final leak checks of the sampling

system

and pitot lines were performed

as outlined

in Method

5 and were recorded

on the data sheets.

The nozzle

(glass with an angle of taper of 30degrees and of button hook design)

was calibrated

before

and after the test using a micrometer and was recorded

on the field data sheets. The sampling

probe was placed at each sampling

point to provide

a total sampling

time of sixty (60) minutes.

The gases were drawn through

a glass nozzle

attached

to a heated glass lined probe.

The probe was maintained

at the proper

settings

to obtain an exit temperature

of greater

than 248 o F during sampling.

The gases then proceeded through borosilicate

glass filter holder,

with a Teflon frit filter support

through

a Teflon filter to remove

particulate

matter.

The filter was maintained

at a temperature

of greater than 248 0 F. These temperatures

were recorded

at each point on the field data sheets. The gases were then scrubbed

through

a series of four pre-weighed

impingers

to capture hydrogen

halides

and halogens

and moisture.

(The optional

first impinger

for a knockout for moisture

was not used.)

The first and second

impingers

contained approximately 100 ml of a 0.1N H2SO4 (acid) solution

and the third and fourth impingers contained approximately

100 ml of a 0.1 N NaOH (alkaline)

solution.

The fifth impinger contained pre weighed

silica gel to remove

any remaining

moisture.

The gases pass through the impinger

series in an ice bath to maintain

a maximum

exit temperature

of 68 o F. This temperature

was also recorded

on the data sheets.

The clean and cool gases then entered

the meter box where the gas flow and temperature

were measured. After the completion

of the test the sampling

train and the probe nozzle assembly

was transferred to the cleanup

area making

sure no particulate

was lost. The cleanup

data was recorded.
The first and second

impinger

contents

were transferred

to its tared container,

weighed and the rinsing from the glassware

were added to this container.

The third and fourth impinger was transferred

to its respective

tared container,

weighed

and the rinsing from the glassware

was added to this container.

The silica gel from the fifth impinger

was transferred to its respective

tared container

and weighed.

A blank of the sulfuric

acid solution, sodium

hydroxide,

distilled

water and acetone

was taken. These containers were clearly marked

and transported

to the laboratory

for analysis.Entec Services,

Inc •i•i•ii!•i•:i•:• ..................................................................

STACK DRAWING

& TRAVERSE

POINT LOCATION Client: Boral Brick Job No. 27109 Source: DIFF Baghouse

Stack Input By: Art Otero Type of Traverse: Velocity (V) or Particulate

(p): Stack Diameter, inches:

54 Stack Height, feet:

75 •erties: Inches Upstream Disturbance:

222.0 Downstream Disturbance:

387.0

P

Port Type

Nipple

Port Diameter Stack Area, Ft•: Number of Ports: Duct Diameters

Length of Port, inches: 4.11 Total Number of Traverse Points: Number of Poin•_.•per

diameter: 7.17 15.904 26.00126 54.0' INCHES

222.0

INCHES Inside Stack

Outside Nipple Point N(•

Inches Inches 1 2.4 8.4 2 7.9 13.9 3 16.0 22.0 4 38.0 44.0 5 46.1 52,1 6 51.6 57.6

Adjusted points diameter > 24" no point closer than 1.0 inch Adjusted points diameter_<

24" no point closer than 0.5 inch Stack Diameters

between 12-24 inches minimum points are 8 4 points per port if the 8 12 diameters downstream

and upstream criteria is met. 387.0Method 26A

Sampling Train

Filter Exit Temperature (>248 F)

rip!rig

npmg #2 I.OOml 0.Ibl 0AN LSO

•aOH •sil lmpingerExit

Temperature (<68 F)

Exhaugt ®O0®O0 J Temp. and Flow Controllers i0 g •

Ice-Ba•h

12Instrument Sampling Train

In-s•ack Filter Cali_b•tiO..n

Gas Line Three WaY valve •

t .H•a•e•

| fH•a•dTeflonLine I •!•.•..•

/

• •Steel probe;

•

Moisture • Sy• comrnunicafon

Lines

Acquisition [ System Flow. Control .Panet.i

0 (:::)

SO2CO

Calibration GaSes.

13Field Dat•

S •eets15 ̧ENTEC Services,

Inc. 16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023
Client: Boral Brick Test Date:

3114/2007 Source: DIFF Baghouse

Stack Run Number:

1

HYDROGEN CHLORIDE

FII•U3 DATA, EPA METHOD

26A

1-1 0.28 1-2 0.30 1-3 0.25 1-4 0.12 1-5 0.18 1-6 0.21 2-1 0,14 2-2 0.17 2-3 0.22

0.5292

3.36

K-Factor 0.5477

3.60 0.5000 3.00 0.3464 1.44 O.4243 2,16 0.4583 2.52 0.3742 1.68 0.4123 2.04

311

71 311 70 309 70 305 70 305 69 308 74 304 73 301 73 0.4690 2.64

309

71 2-4 0.31

0.5568

3.72

308

70 2-5 0.27

0,5196

3.24

309

72 2-6 0.12

0.3464

1.44

310

75

12.00 0.21

0.4570

2.57

307.5

71.50

.£3

•EEE

"Operator: Plant Name: Location:

Lynn Beane Boral Brick Union City, OK Boral Brick Union City DIFF Oultet

(Stack) Test Run No. 1

Date Time

CO; ppm

SO2; ppm 3/14/2007 11:30:12

71.4 3/14/2007 11:31:11

70.2 3114/2007 11:32:11

69.0 3114/2007 11:33:12

68.1 3/14/2007 11:34:12

67.5 3/14/2007 11:35:11

67.1 3/14/2007 11:36:11

66.6 3114/2007 11:37:12

66.3 3/14/2007 11:39:11

74.1 3/14/2007 11:40:12

92.2 3/14/2007 11:41:12

95.8 3/14/2007 11:42:13

110.0 3114/2007 11:43:12

116.9 3/14/2007 11:44:12

117.5 3114/2007 11:45:11

131.8 3/14/2007 11:46:11

149.2 3114/2007 11:47:12

125.9 3114/2007 11:48:12

93.0 3114/2007 11:49:13

77,9 3/14/2007 11:50:12

72.9 3/14/2007 11:51:12

72.1 3/14/2007 11:52:13

71.4 3114/2007 11:53:13

70.2 3/14/2007 11:54:12

69.0 3/14/2007 11:55:12

67.5 3/14/2007 11:56:11

66.6 3/14/2007 11:57:12

65.8 3/14/2007 11:58:12

65.1 3/14/2007 11:59:11

64.9 3/1412007 12:00:11

65.3 3/14/2007 12:01:10

66.6 3114/2007 12:02:10

84.7 3/14/2007 12:03:09

97.8 3114/2007 12:04:09

109.7 3114/2007 12:05:10

119.4 3/14/2007 12:06:11

122.3 3/14/2007 12:07:11

141.6 3/14/2007 12:08:10

141.4 311412007 12:09:10

171.3 3/14/2007 12:10:11

152.2 3114/2007 12:11:09

114.2 3/14/2007 12:12:10

97.5 3/14/2007 12:13:11

83.7 3/14/2007 12:14:11

76.1 3/14/2007 12:15:12

74.9 3/14/2007 12:16:13

66.3 311412007 12:17:13

61.7 3/14/2007 12:18:12

63.5 311412007 12:19:12

63.7 3/14/2007 12:20:11

64.1 3/14/2007 12:21:11

64.2 3/14/2007 12:22:12

64.2 3/1412007 12:23:13

64.1 3114/2007 12:24:13

63.9 3114/2007 12:25:12

79.0 3/14/2007 12:26:12

98.6 3/14/2007 12:27:11

109.2 3/14/2007 12:28:11

119.3 3114/2007 12:29:12

123.4 3/14/2007 12:30:10

124.9 Test Run End 88.8

10.39°08.78.58.89.08.37.66.04.76.839.9 87.6 137.9 219.0 84.2 37.5 25.4 20.1 16.7 14.4 13.1 12.0 11.1 10.7 10.39.58.88.79.09.17.35.78.545.2 93,2 140.9 161.0 83.2 39.1 24.9 17.9 13.6 11.4 10.49.28.07.47.37.17.47.47.46.75,64.95.434.9 82.8 139.9 29.7Calculation of Average

Emissions

Test Performed

For: Boral Brick Union City, Oklahoma Kiln DIFF Exhuast Compliance Date:3/14/07 Test Performed

By: Entec Services,

Inc. Birmingham Division Test Trailer 901 Mr. Lynn Beane Run 1 Calibration Gas Value 0.0 ppm CO 227.00 ppm CO Initial Calibration 0.0 ppm 228.2 ppm

Final Calibration 0.1 ppm 226.5 ppm

Average 0.05 227.35
0.0 ppm SO2 221.00 ppm SO2 0.0 ppm 221.0 ppm

3.0 ppm 221.0 ppm

1.50 221.00

Mean Reference

Values: 88.8 ppm CO 29.7 ppm SO2 Corrected

Results: 88.64 ppm CO 28.42 ppm SO•

Basis: DRY DRY

19ENTEC Services,

Inc.
16-D Commerce

Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023
Client: Boral Brick Test Date:

3/14/2007 Source: DIFF Baghouse

Stack Run Number:

2

HYDROGEN CHLORIDE

FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD

26A

Traverse Point

DeltaP

Sq. Rt. DeltaP

DeltaH

Stack Temp. (°F) Meter Temp.(OF) 1-11-21-3 0.28

0.5292 0.32 0.5657 0.20 0.4472 1-4 O.23

0.4796 1-5 0.23

0.4796 1-62-12-22-32-4

K-Factor 0.25

0.5000 0.29 0.5385 0.23 0.4796 0.26 0.22 0.5099 0.4690

3.39 3.87 2.42

302301298

757375 2.78 296

76 2.78 303

79 3.02 3073043053O4307 3.51 2.78 3.14 2.66 2-5 0.18

0.4243

2.18

305 2-6 0.24

0.4899

2.90

304

2.95 303.0 0.4927

8O8O8O79798O82

78.2

21138Operator:, Plant Name: Location:

Lynn Beane Boral Brick Union City, OK Boral Brick Union City DIFF Oultet

(Stack) Test Run No. 2

Date Time

CO; ppm

$02; ppm 3114/2007 12:51:49

123.5 3114/2007 12:52:49

124.2 3/1412007 12:53:49

136.7 3/14/2007 12:54:50

143.0 3114/2007 12:55:50

124,6 3114/2007 12:56:49

97.4 3/14/2007 12:57:49

88.2 3114/2007 12:58:50

73.3 3/14/2007 12:59:49

71.2 3114/2007 13:00:49

70.6 3114/2007 13:01:50

69.6 3114/2007 13:02:50

68.5 3114/2007 13:03:49

67,2 3/14/2007 13:04:49

66.2 3/14/2007 13:05:50

65.4 3/14/2007 13:06:51

64.8 311412007 13:07:51

64.5 3114/2007 13:08:50

64. 8 3114/2007 13:09:50

66.1 3/14/2007 13:10:49

84,4 3/14/2007 13:11:50

97.4 3/14/2007 13:12:50

109.4 3/14/2007 13:13:51

118.1 3114/2007 13:14:51

119.0 3/14/2007 13•15:50

137.9 311412007 13:16:50

141.6 3/14/2007 13:17:51

173.3 3/14/2007 13:18:50

141.3 3114/2007 13:19:50

103.6 3114/2007 ,13:20:51

93.8 3/14/2007 13:21:51

80,0 3114/2007 13:22:50

75,3 3114/2007 13:23:50

63.5 3114/2007 13:24:51

62.1 3/14/2007 13:25:51

61.7 3/14/2007 13:26:51

62.1 3/14/2007 13:27:50

62.6 3/14/2007 13:28:50

63,5 3114/2007 13:29:51

64,2 3114/2007 13:30:52

64.4 3114/2007 13:31:52

64.5 3114/2007 13:32:51

64.3 3/14/•nn7 3:33:51

82.6 3/14/2007 13:34:50

102.6 3/14/2007 13:35:50

114.6 3/14/2007 13: 36:51

123.4 3/14/2007 13:37:52

125.4 3114/2007 13:38:52

126.7 311412007 13:39:51

141.0 3114/2007 13:40:51

132.7 3114/2007 13:41:50

111.8 3114/2007 13:42:50

89.8 3/14/2007 13:43:51

77.5 3114/2007 13:44:50

72.3 3/14/2007 13:45:50

71.7 3/14/2007 13:46:51

71.3 3/14/2007 13:47:51

70.5 3/14/2007 13:48:50

69.7 3/14/2007 13:49:50

68,9 3/14/2007 13:50:51

68.2 3/14/2007 13:51:50

67.7 Test Rmt End 90.6

78.4 136.4 217.6 64.7 26.6 12.8 5.40.7 -1.1 -2.3 -3,3 -6.0 -6,4 -7,9 -6.6 -9.5 -10,0 0.38.36,65,26,7 33.6 80.5 124,0 138.7 64.3 30.7 17.8 12.5 10.2 7.86.24.43.32.62.12.12.21.92.12.21.71.61.75.8 32.6 83.1 105.0 35.0 19.9 12.7 11,4 10.7 10.2 9.69.89.59.49,39.223.2Calculation of Average

Emissions

Test Performed

For: Boral Brick Union City, Oklahoma Kiln DIFF Exhuast Compliance Date:3/14/07 Test Performed

By: Entec Services,

Inc. Birmingham Division Test Trailer 901 Mr. Lynn Beane Run 2 Calibration Gas Value 0.0 ppm CO 227.00 ppm CO Initial Calibration 0.1 ppm 226.5 ppm

Final Calibration -0.1 ppm 229.1 ppm

Average 0.00 227.80
0.0 ppm S02 221.00 ppm S02 3.0 ppm 221.0 ppm

3.0 ppm 222.0 ppm

3.00 221.50

Mean Reference

Values: 90.5 ppm CO 23.2 ppm SO2 Corrected

Results: 90.2 ppm CO 20.4 ppm SO2

Basis: DRY DRYENTEC Services,

Inc. 16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023
Client• Boral Brick Test Date:

3114/2007 Source: DIFF Baghouse

Stack Run Number:

3

HYDROGEN CHLORIDE

FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD

26A

Traverse Point

Delta P 1-1 0,30 1-2 0.26

0.5099 1-3 0.20

0.4472 1-41-51-62-1 0.23 0.24 0.19 0.24 2-2 0.27 2-3 0.27 2-42-52-6 0.25 0.21 0.17

Sq. RLDeltaP 0.5477

0.4796

Delta H 3.63 3.14 2.42 2.78

Stack Temp. (°F) 301301

78 303 78 306 0.4899 2.90

310 0.4359 2.30

312 0.4899 2.90

306 0.5196 3.26

310 0.5196 0.5000 0.4583 3.26 3.02

2.06 0.4123

2.85 K-Factor 12.09 0,24

0.4842 3O9310304308

306.7

Meter Temp. (°F) 81

797981808083

8385

80.9

2627Operator. Plant

Name: Location:

Lynn Beane BoralBdck Union Ci•, OK Boral Brick Union City DIFF Oultet (Stack) Test Run No. 3

Date Time

CO; ppm

SO2; ppm 311412007 14:10:01

74.9

14.2 3/14/2007 14:11:01

72.7

12.1 3/14/2007 14:12:02

70.9

10.7 311412007 14:13:02

69.8

14.8 3/14/2007 14:14:01

69.0

12.8 3/14/2007 14:15:01

68.3

11.4 3/14/2007 14:16:02

68.1

10.5 3/14/2007 14:17:02

68,9

9.1 3/14/2007 14:18:01

88.0

8.9 3114/2007 14:19:02

99.4

7.5 3/14/2007 14:20:02

120.7

6.5 3/14/2007 14:21:01

126.6

6.1 3114/2007 14:22:01

140.6

33.4 311412007 14:23:02

146.7

92.1 3/14/2007 14:24:02

147.4

145.2 3114/2007 14:25:01

154.8

155.0 3114/2007 14:26:02

171.1

106.5 311412007 14:27:02

173.2

46.9 3114/2007 14:28:01

121.2

28.9 3/14/2007 14:29:01

100.1

20,2 3114/2007 14:30:02

65.1

17.2 3114/2007 14:31:02

80.7

14.5 3114/2007 14:32:01

71.0

12.9 3114/2007 14:33:02

68.3

12.0 3/1412007 14:34:02

67.4

10.4 3114/2007 14:35:01

66.2

10.0 3114/2007 14:36:01

65.3

9.8 3114/2007 14:37:02

64,5

9,9 3/14/2007 14:38:03

64.9

10.4 3/14/2007 14:39:03

65.4

11.0 3/14/2007 14:40:02

65.5

10,9 3/14/2007 14:41:02

65.7

10.8 3114/2007 14:42:03

76,1

10.0 3114/2007 14:43:03

102.2

9.4 311412007 14:44:02

115.1

10.5 3/14/2007 14:45:03

127.5

40.2 3/14/2007 14:46:03

131.5

97.4 3/14/2007 14:47:02

133.2

148.4 3/14/2007 14:48:02

148.5

240.8 3/14/2007 14:49:03

147.3

82,5 311412007 14:50:03

129.5

42.0 3/14/2007 t4:51:02

101.2

29.1 3114/2007 14:52:03

83.4

23.7 3114/2007 14:53:03

75.8

20.9 3/1412007 14:54:02

74.6

19.3 3/14/2007 14:55:02

73.9

17.7 3/1412007 14:56:03

73.1

16.7 3/14/2007 14:57:01

71.9

16.4 311412007 14:58:02

70.7

16.0 3/14/2007 14:59:01

70.0

16.0 3/14/2007 15:00:01

69.4

16.7 3114/2007 15:01:02

69.0

15.5 3114/2007 16:02:02

68.7

15.2 3/14/2007 15:03:01

68.6

14.8 3/14/2007 15:04:01

68.6

14,5 3/14/2007 15:05:02

79.2

13.3 3114/2007 15:06:01

97.1

12,8 3/14/2007 15:07:01

99.9

13.0 3/14/2007 15:08:02

115.9

43.0 311412007 15:09:02

119.1

89.5 3/14/2007 15:10:01

120.0

137.2 Test Run 3 End 94.4

33.9

28Calculation of Average

Emissions

Test Performed

For: Boral Brick Union City, Oklahoma Kiln DIFF Exhuast Compliance Date:3/14/07Calibration

Gas Value 0.0 ppm CO 227.00 ppm CO
0.0 ppm SO2 221.00 ppm S02 Initial Calibration -0.1 ppm 229.1 ppm
3.0 ppm 222.0 ppm

Test Performed

By: Entec Services,

Inc. Birmingham Division Test Trailer 901 Mr. Lynn Beane Run 3 Final Calibration 3.4 ppm 228.6 ppm

Average 1.65 228.85
3.0 ppm 223.0 ppm

3.00 222.50

Mean Reference

Values: 94.4 ppm CO 33.9 ppm SO2 Corrected

Results: 92.6 ppm CO 31.1 ppm SO2

Basis: DRY DRY

29Control Room

Production DataProduction Data The information

on the following

pages was received

by email from Mr. Frank Porter of Boral Bricks for the testing performed

at their facility in Union City, Oklahoma,

on March 14, 2007.

31Sent:

Thursday,

March 29, 2007 10:26 AM To: James Brewer (Bricks Union City); Justin McKenna

(Bricks Muskogee) Subject: Fw: Control Room Data Union City Importance: High Please verify the production

data for the stack testing. I am planning to have feedback on the turnaround

document

this afternoon.

Sorry for the delay. Thanks, FrankOriginal Message From: Lynn Beane <LBeane@entecservices.com> To: Frank Porter (Bricks Phenix City) Cc: tomlotzsr@entecservices.com <tomlotzsr@entecservices.com> Sent: Thu Mar29 10:21:53 2007 Subject: Control Room Data Union City Frank,

Just to verify the lab production

data for Union City.

18.14 tons fired brick 36 tons of lime injection

D. Lynn Beane Entec Services, Inc. Operations Manager 1-800-429-8445 1-205-491-6676 (o) 1-205-613-5473 (c) www.entecservices.com <._h....•...;_./../__w_•,..e_n._t_.e._.c...s..e..

_ry_.i._c_._e..s_..c..o....m..>

4/11/2007

32Orig inal

Test

ProtocolEntec Services, 16-D Commerce

Avenue Hueytown, Alabama

35023 Telephone: (205) 491-6676 Fax: (205) 491-6614 Test Protocol

for the Kiln DIFF Stack Compliance Emissions

Testing

at the Boral Brick Company

Facility Located in Union City, Oklahoma
Submitted to: Borai_.Brick P. O. Box 1178 Columbus, Georgia

31902
Attention: Mr. Frank Porter cc: State of Oklahoma

Department

of Environmental

Quality

Mr. Johnnie

Little
Entec Project No.27109 Completed By: Protocol

Submitted:

December

18, 2006 Reviewed By:

Tom Lotz QA / QC Manager

34Test Prog ram This proposed

test program

will take one day to complete.

Entec proposes

to begin testing on the week of February

19, 2007. Entec will arrive on site and begin testing on the DIFF stack at approximately

9:00 am for Hydrogen

Chloride,

Sulfur Dioxide

& Carbon Monoxide

emissions.

The following

are the test procedures,

QA/QC procedures, and other documentation

to be used for this test program.
All production

data will be provided

by Boral Brick and be included

in the final report. Procedures The Hydrogen

Chloride,

Sulfur Dioxide,

and Carbon

Monoxide

on the Brick Kiln DIFF outlet will be determined

by EPA Methods

1-4, 6C, 10 and 26A of the CFR Title 40, Part 60 Appendix

A. The calibration

and quality assurance

procedures

of EPA CFR 40 Part 60 Appendix

A Methods

1-4, 6C, 10 and 26A of the "Quality

Assurance

Handbook

for Air Pollution

Measurement

System"

Volume

III Stationary

Source-Specific

Methods

will be followed

throughout

the duration

of the field and laboratory

testing.

The most current CFR revision

of each method

(July 1, 2004) will be used. The following

paragraphs summarize the protocol.
Stack Gas Volumetric

Flow The velocity

of the gas stream will be determined

according

to EPA Reference

Method 2 by reading

the instantaneous

velocity

head with an inclined

manometer

at each sampling point with_a•alibrated

S-type pitot tube•attached

adjacent•o•he

sampte nozzle. The stack pressure

will be measured

with the static side of an S-type pitot tube. A calibrated

pyrometer

will be used to measure

stack temperature

at each sampling point. The stack will be tested for cyclonic

flow according

to EPA Reference

Method

2. Stack Gas Molecular

Weight The carbon dioxide and oxygen

concentrations

will be determined

using EPA Reference Method 3. A grab sample

of the flue gas will be extracted

from the gas stream during each particulate

test run and analyzed

using a Fyrite analyzer.

The molecular

weight of the gas will be calculated

based on the moisture,

oxygen

and carbon dioxide

content

3•along with the measured

stack gas temperature.

The Fyrite sampling

system

will be verified to be leak free prior to the analysis. Moisture Content The moisture

content

used for calculating

the gas stream

flow rate is determined

by measuring the amount

of condensed

moisture

in the series of impingers

in the sampling train as described

in EPA Reference

Method

4 (in conjunction

with Method

26A impinger setup) at the completion

of each test.
The moisture

collection

system

consists

of a series of impingers.

Ice is placed around the impingers

to maintain

a temperature

<68 o F. The outlet temperature

of the impingers is monitored

and recorded

throughout

the duration

of the testing

to verify the temperature is below <68 o F. Hvdroaen Chloride Preliminary data will be used to determine

stack temperature,

pressure,

and range of velocity heads, moisture

content

and stack gas dry molecular

weight prior to sampling. The meter box will be leak checked

from the pump to the orifice.

Initial and final leak checks of the sampling

system

and pitot lines will be performed

and will be recorded

on the data sheets.

The nozzle (glass with an angle of taper of 30 degrees

and of button hook design)

will be calibrated

before and after the test using a micrometer

and will be also recorded

on the data sheets. The sampling

probe will be placed at each sampling

point to provide

a total sampling time of at least 60 minutes

and a volume

of at least 31.8 cubic feet. The gases will be drawn through

a glass nozzle attached

to a heated glass lined probe. The probe will be maintained at the proper setting to obtain an exit temperature

of > 248 0 F. The gases then proceeded

through

borosilicate

glass filter holder,

with a Teflon frit filter support through a tarred teflon or quartz fiber filter to remove

particulate

matter.

The exit of the filter will be maintained

at a temperature

of > 248 o F. These temperatures

will be recorded at each point on the data sheets. The gases will be then scrubbed

through

a series of four impingers

to capture

hydrogen halides and halogens

and moisture.

The optional

first impinger

for a knockout

for 335moisture will be used.)

The second

and third impingers

will contain

approximately

100 ml of a 0.1N H2SO4 solution

and the fourth and fifth impingers

will contain

approximately 100 ml of a 0.1 N NaOH solution.

The sixth impinger

will contain

pre weighed

silica gel to remove

any remaining

moisture.

The gases pass through

the impinger

series in an ice bath to maintain

a maximum

exit temperature

of 68 0 F. This temperature

will be also recorded

on the data sheets.

The clean and cool gases then entered

the meter box where the gas flow and temperature

.will be measured. After the completion

of the test leak rate determinations

will be made. Then thesampling train and the probe nozzle assembly

will be transferred

to the cleanup

area making
sure no sample

is lost. The cleanup

data will be recorded. Each acetone

rinse from the nozzle, and probe, will be combined

and placed in a sealed container. For the group of tests an acetone

blank of approximately

200 milliliters

will be placed in a sealed container.

The first, second

and third impinger

contents

will be transferred to its tarred container,

weighed

and the rinsing from the glassware

will be added to this container.

The fourth and fifth impinger

contents

will be transferred

to its respective tarred container,

weighed

and the rinsing from the glassware

will be added to this container.

The silica gel from the fifth impinger

will be transferred

to its respective tarred container

and weighed.

A blank of the sulfuric

acid solution,

sodium

hydroxide, distilled water and acetone

will be taken. These containers

will be clearly marked

and transported to the laboratory

for analysis.

437QA / QC Procedu

res Specific quality assurance

/ quality control procedures

will be adhered

to during this test project to provide

valid and scientifically

defensible

data. For any environmental

field and laboratory

measurement,

a degree

of uncertainty

exists in the data due to inherent limitations of the measurement

systems

employed.

The objective

of a QA/QC

program is to produce

data of known precision,

accuracy,

representation,

completeness

and comparability. The objective

in this test project

is to determine

compliance

with applicable air permit requirements.

The final data user in this project will be the State of Oklahoma Department

of Environmental

Quality. The following

section

details

all QC procedures

to be followed

during the manual sampling activities. Velocity / Volumetric

Flow Rat•- Volumetric flow rates will be determined

during each isokinetic

test run. The following QC steps will be adhered

to during these tests: Reported duct dimensions

will be checked

by physical

measurements

to determine cross-sectional duct area. Pitot tube coefficients

are determined

based on physical

measurement

techniques as delineated

in Method

2 before and after each test. The Type-S

pitot tube are visually

inspected

before and after sampling. The pitot tube is installed

on the sampling

probe with the proper orientation

and spacing from the sampling

nozzle. Before each series of tests, thermocouple

readings

for the silica gel impinger

exit temperature are checked

against

an N.I.S.T.

traceable

thermometer. The oil manometer

is leveled and zeroed before each test run. Both legs of the pitot tube are leak-checked

before and after sampling. Proper orientation

of the pitot tube is maintained

while making

measurements.

The roll and pitch axis of the pitot tube is maintained

at 90 o to the flow. An average

velocity

pressure

reading

is recorded

at each point instead

ofrecording extreme high or low values. The pitot/manometer

umbilical

lines are inspected

before and after sampling

for moisture condensate.

Lines are cleared

if moisture

is found. 538Molecular Weiqht

Determination

Fyrite Analysis The carbon

dioxide

and oxygen

concentrations

are determined

using EPA Reference Method 3. A sample

of the flue gas is extracted

from the gas stream during each test. The samples

are analyzed

with a Fyrite gas analyzer.

The following

QC steps are adhered to during these tests: The sampling

train is leak checked

before and after each sample

is taken. The samples

are run in triplicate

for accuracy. Standardization is performed

to audit the reagents

and the operators

technique.

A known mixture

of CO2 and O2 is analyzed

and repeated

with 3 consecutive

values +/- 0.5 percent

of the known value. Two NIST traceable

gas cylinders

are run against

the instrument

to audit the accuracy of the analyzer

and the analyzer

operator

technique.

One cylinder contains 2 to 4 percent

O2 and 14 to 18 percent

CO2. The second

cylinder

contains 2 to 4 percent

CO2 and about 15 percent

02. Moisture Determination Stack gas moisture

content

(Bws) is determined

by dividing

the mass of moisture collected by the impingers

or stainless

steel condenser

and silica gel impinger

by the standardized volume

of gas sampled.

The following

QC steps are adhered

to during these tests: The indicating

silica gel is fresh for the first run and periodically

inspected

and replaced during runs, if needed. The analytical

balance

is placed in a clean, motionless

environment

for weighing. ]-he balance

=s leveled and zeroed if necessary

before each weighing. Preliminary silica gel impinger

tare weights

and post-run

weights

are weighed

to the nearest 0.1 g. Before each sedes of tests, thermocouple

readings

for the silica gel impinger

exit temperature are checked

against

an N.I.S.T.

traceable

thermometer. The silica gel impinger

gas temperature

is maintained

below 68°F and recorded

at every traverse

point. Each impinger

is wiped of surface

moisture

before post-run

weighing. The volume

of liquid captured

is measured

using a graduated

cylinder

with 1- milliliter increments. 639Hvdroc•en Chloride

Sampling

(Modified

Sample

Train w/o Particulate) Accurate HCI concentrations

are dependent

on the sample

collection

system

and the final impinger

collection

system for analytical

analysis.

QC procedures

that are followed
-so that representative

Hydrogen

Chloride

data is collected

by the sampling

system were:Only clean, well-maintained

sampling

equipment

is used. Sampling ports are inspected

and cleaned

prior to sampling. All equipment

is calibrated

according

to EPA standards.

The dry gas meter is fully calibrated within the past 12 months

using a set of calibrated

orifices. The sampling

train components

exposed

to sample

gas are constructed

of glass, or Teflon. Accurate barometric

pressure

is recorded

at least once per day. The dry gas meter thermocouples

are compared

to ambient

temperature

prior to the test run as a check on operation. Pretest and post-test

leak-checks

are completed

(must be less than 0.02 cfm or 4% of the average

sampling

rate). Before each series of tests, thermocouple

readings

for meter temperature,

filter hotbox, probe, and filter exit temperatures

are checked

against

an N.I.S.T.

traceable thermometer. Readings of the dry gas meter, meter orifice pressure

(/•H), meter temperatures, filter hotbox

temperatures,

probe temperatures,

and filter exit temperatures

are taken at every traverse

point. Probe and fiite•temperatu•es

are monitored

andmaintainecLgrater than-248

°F for the DIFF Stack. The filter exit temperature

was maintained

at grater than 248 °F for the DIFF Stack. The gas meter is read to the thousandth

of a cubic foot for the initial and final readings. The sampling

velocity

through

the nozzle is maintained

within 10% of the stack gas velocity (isokinetic

sampling

rate at 100+10%). All nozzle/probe

recovery

items are pro-cleaned

and kept in containers

when not being used. Probe and nozzle recovery

includes

wiping the outer surface

clean of dust beforesample recovery.

Sample

recovery

consists

of multiple

brushing

of the inner surface and twisting/rotating

the probe during recovery

operations.

Transfer

of rinse acetone to the sample

container

is accomplished

Without

loss of liquid. Nozzle and probe brushes

are rinsed after brushing

inner surfaces. Liquid levels are marked

on sample

containers

and sealed for shipment

to the laboratory. Acetone rinse blanks are collected

for laboratory

analysis. Prior to the initial run a y-factor

check is performed

to ensure

that the meter is operating according

to the original

calibration

to within 3% of the original y-factor. For the post-test

calibration

the alternative

Method

5 post-test

calibration procedures are used (Emission

Measurement

Center Approved

Alternative

Method ALT-009).Quality Assurance / Quality

Control Procedures

z•2QA

/ QC Procedures Specific quality assurance

/ quality control

procedures

were adhered

to during this test project to provide

valid and scientifically

defensible

data. For any environmental

field and laboratory

measurement,

a degree

of uncertainty

exists in the data due to inherent limitations of the measurement

systems

employed.

The objective

of a QA/QC

program is to produce

data of known

precision,

accuracy,

representation,

completeness

and comparability. The objective

in this test project

was to determine

compliance

with applicable air permit

requirements.

The final data user in this project

will be the Oklahoma Department

of Environmental

Quality

(DEQ). The following

section

details

all QC procedures

followed

during the manual

sampling activities. Velocity I Volumetric

Flow Rate Volumetric flow rates were determined

during each isokinetic

test run. The following QC steps were adhered

to during these tests: Reported duct dimensions

were checked

by physical

measurements

to determine cross-sectional duct area. Pitot tube coefficients

were determined

based on physical

measurement

techniques
as delineated

in Method

2 The Type-S

pitot tube was visually

inspected

before and after sampling. The pitot tube was installed

on the sampling

probe with the proper orientation

and spacing from the sampling

nozzle. Before each series of tests, thermocouple

readings

for the silica gel impinger

exit temperature was checked

against

an N.I.S.T.

traceable

thermometer. The oil manometer

was leveled

and zeroed

before each test run. Both legs of the pitot tube were leak-checked

before and after sampling. Proper orientation

of the pitot tube was maintained

while making

measurements. The roll and pitch axis of the pitot tube was maintained

at 90 o to the flow. An average

velocity

pressure

reading

was recorded

at each point instead

of recording extreme

high or low values. The pitot/manometer

umbilical

lines were inspected

before and after sampling

for moisture condensate.

Lines were cleared

if moisture

was found.

43Molecular Weiqht

Determination-Fyrite Analysis The carbon

dioxide

and oxygen

concentrations

were determined

using EPA Reference Method 3. A sample

of the flue gas was extracted

from the gas stream during each test. The samples

were analyzed

with a Fyrite gas analyzer.

The following

QC steps were adhered to during these tests: The sampling

train was leak checked

before and after each samples

was taken, The samples

were run in triplicate

for accuracy. Standardization was performed

to audit the reagents

and the operators

technique. A known

mixture

of CO2 and 02 was analyzed

and repeated

with 3 consecutive values +/- 0.5 percent

of the known value, Two NIST traceable

gas cylinders

were run against

the instrument

to audit the accuracy of the analyzer

and the analyzer

operator

technique.

One cylinder contained 2 to 4 percent

O2 and 14 to 18 percent

CO2. The second

cylinder contained 2 to 4 percent

CO2 and about 15 percent

02. Moisture Determination Stack gas moisture

content

(Bws) was determined

by dividing

the mass of moisture collected by the impingers

or stainless

steel condenser

and silica gel impinger

by the standardized volume

of gas sampled.

The following

QC steps were adhered

to during these tests: The indicating

silica gel was fresh for the first run and periodically

inspected

and replaced during runs, if needed. The analytical

balance

was placed

in a clean, motionless

environment

for weighing. The balance

was leveled

and zeroed

if necessary

before each weighing. Preliminary silica gel impinger-tare

weights

and postlrun

weight•were

weighed•o the nearest

0.1 g. Before each series of tests, thermocouple

readings

for the silica gel impinger

exit temperature were checked

against

an N.I.S.T.

traceable

thermometer. The silica gel impinger

gas temperature

was maintained

below 68°F and recorded at every traverse

point. Each impinger

was wiped of surface

moisture

before post-run

weighing, The volume

of liquid captured

was measured

using a graduated

cylinder

with 1- milliliter increments.Sulfur Dioxide

Determination-Instrumental Analysis

Method

6C The sulfur dioxide

concentrations

were determined

using EPA Reference

Method

6C. A sample of the flue gas was extracted

from the gas stream

during each test. Moisture was removed

form the sample

and was analyzed

on a dry basis with an Instrumental gas analyzer.

The following

QC steps were adhered

to during these tests: Only analyzers

that have a resolution

or sensitivity

of at least < 2.0% of full-scale range are used. Upon the SO2 analyzers

initial use in the field, an interference

check

was conducted. The reference

calibration

gases used in this test program

are certified

following EPA Protocol

Number

1 analysis.

Copies

of the calibration

gas certifications

are included in the instrument

calibration

section. The high level gas was equal to the calibration

span gas. The mid level gas was between

40 and 60 % of the calibration

span gas. The low level gas was < 20% of the calibration

span gas. In accordance

with EPA Method

3A a three-point

(i.e., zero, mid-, and high-range) analyzer calibration

error was conducted

on each reference

analyzer

prior to initiating the compliance

testing.

These

checks

were conducted

(after final calibration adjustments

were made)

by injecting

the calibration

gases directly

into each gas analyzer

and recorded

the responses. The analyzer

calibration

error was less than + 2.0% or _+ 0.5 ppm of the calibration span gas for the zero, mid-range,

and high-range

calibration

gases. The probe material

was stainless

steel. The probe, filter and sample

line temperature

was maintained

above the dew point by heating,

prior to sample

conditioning. The sampling

system

bias was less than + 5.0 % or of the calibration

span gas for the zero and upscale

calibration

gases • 0.5 ppm absolute

difference). The system

response

time .was calculated

during the initial sampling

system

bias. The drift for either the low-level

and mid-level

or high-level

gases was less than + 3.0% or of the calibration

span gas (+ 0.5 ppm absolute

difference). The sampling

system

was purged

> 2 times the system

response

time before each test run. Sample flow rate was maintained

within 10% during the entire test period. Data is recorded

at 1-minute

intervals.

45All data collected

was within the calibration

span gas. Carbon Monoxide

Determination-Instrumental Analysis-

Method

10 The carbon

monoxide

concentrations

were determined

using EPA Reference

Method 10. A sample

of the flue gas was extracted

from the gas stream

during each test. Moisture was removed

form the sample

and was analyzed

on a dry basis with an Instrumental gas analyzer.

The following

QC steps were adhered

to during these tests: Only analyzers

that have a resolution

or sensitivity

of at least < 2.0% of full-scale range are used. Upon the CO analyzers

initial use in the field, an interference

check was conducted. The reference

calibration

gases used in this test program

are certified

following EPA Protocol

Number

1 analysis.

Copies

of the calibration

gas certifications

are included in the instrument

calibration

section. The high level gas was equal to the calibration

span gas. The mid level gas was between

40 and 60 % of the calibration

span gas. The low level gas was < 20% of the calibration

span gas. In accordance

with EPA Method

3A a three-point

(i.e., zero, mid-, and high-range) analyzer calibration

error was conducted

on each reference

analyzer

prior to initiating the compliance

testing.

These

checks

were conducted

(after final calibration adjustments

were made) by injecting

the calibration

gases directly

into each gas analyzer

and recorded

the responses. The analyzer

calibration

error was less than _+ 2.0% or + 0.5 ppm of the calibration span gas for the zero, mid-range,

and high-range

calibration

gases. ]'he probematerial

was stainless

steel. The probe, filter and sample

line temperature

was maintained

above the dew point by heating,

prior to sample

conditioning. The sampling

system

bias was less than + 5.0 % or of the calibration

span gas for the zero and upscale

calibration

gases (_?_ 0.5 ppm absolute

difference). The system

response

time was calculated

during the initial sampling

system

bias. The drift for either the low-level

and mid-level

or high-level

gases was less than + 3.0% or of the calibration

span gas (_?_ 0.5 ppm absolute

difference). The sampling

system

was purged

> 2 times the system

response

time before each test run. Sample flow rate was maintained

within 10% during the entire test period.Data is recorded

at 1-minute

intervals. All data collected

was within the calibration

span gas. Hvdroqen Chloride

(HCl) Accurate concentrations

are dependent

on the collection

of HCI-HF

by the train and recovered after sampling,

and the standardized

gas sample

volume

measured.

QC procedures that were followed

so that representative

particulate

data was collected

by the sampling

system

were: Only clean, well-maintained

sampling

equipment

was used. Sampling ports were inspected

and cleaned

prior to sampling. All equipment

was calibrated

according

to EPA standards.

The dry gas meter was fully calibrated

within the past 12 months

using a set of calibrated

orifices. The sampling

train components

exposed

to sample

gas were constructed

of glass
or Teflon. Accurate barometric

pressure

was recorded

at least once per day. The dry gas meter thermocouples

were compared

to ambient

temperature

prior to the test run as a check on operation. Pretest and post-test

leak-checks

were completed

(must be less than 0.02 cfm or 4% of the average

sampling

rate). Before each series of tests, thermocouple

readings

for meter temperature,

filter hotbox, probe,

and filter exit temperatures

were checked

against

an N.I.S.T. traceable thermometer. Readings of the dry gas meter, meter orifice pressure

(/•H), meter temperatures, filter hotbox

temperaturesrprobe•temperatures_and-filter_exit_temperatures•were taken at every traverse

point. Probe and filter temperatures

were monitored

and maintained

at a temperature greater than 248°F. The gas meter was read to the thousandth

of a cubic foot for the initial and final readings. The sampling

velocity

through

the nozzle was maintained

within 10% of the stack gas velocity

(isokinetic

sampling

rate at 100+10%). A blank was collected

for laboratory

analysis. Prior to the initial run a y-factor

check was performed

to ensure

that the meter was operating according

to the original

calibration

to within 3% of the original

y-factor.For the post-test

calibration

the alter, native

Method

5 post-test

calibration procedures were used (Emission

Measurement

Center

Approved

Alternative Method ALT-009),

,!ENTEC SERVICES, INC FIELD QA/QC

CHECKLIST

SOURCE TESTED: PERMIT NUMBER: TEST METHODS

USED: CONTROL AGENCY: ENTEC PERSONNEL: LOCATION: TYPE CONTROL

DEVICE: PERMIT LIMITS: MODIFICATIONS TO METHOD: ON SaTE REPRESENTATIVE: PLANT CONTACT:

Was Calibration

Data on site? (Methods

1-5 / CEMS CAL Gas) Was Stack Diameter

I Area & Traverse

Points vedfied on field data sheets?

YE._3S

5.

7. Was a 10-minute

Meter Orifice Check performed? Results of check Were Temperatures

Verified

w/NIST Traceable

Thermometer? Was Preliminary

Traverse

wl Cyclonic

Flow verification

performed? Was previous

test data on source used to determine

K factor? Was Probe & Hot Box Temperatures

maintained

at 248 +/- 25 ° F? If not, explain ,K

x

8. Was Filter Outlet Temperature

maintained

at 248 +/- 25 ° F? IfnoLexplain•.•,a•_ •=/•"F

•P•¢" _•A 9. Was Orsat or Fyrite leak checked

and standardization

perfo_rr•ed

as required? Ambient 02 Reading

,,• e.•' % Ambient

CO2 Reading

.j•r % 10. Was Tedlar Gas Sampling

Bags used? If not, explain

•r'• 7 •- eVV•re they leak-ch•?

Y or N / 11. Were Pitot Leak Checks performed

& recorded

on each field data sheet? Pitot inspected?(•or

N Noted Visual Defects?

/VoM_ 12. Was Meter Leak Checks performed

& recorded

on each field date sheet? 13. Was Nozzle Diameter

measured

& recorded

o• each field data sheet? Nozzle inspected?

•or N Noted Visual Defects?

/V'e,.t. 14. Was Silica Gel Verified,

and recorded

for each test run? Percentage Used dudng test Run No.'s 1: / • 2: ,/•' 3: / 15. Was Acetone

Lot Number)•,•ed

and rec, orj•ed•on

Field Data Sheet 3ignature (Test Team Leader):

2'•

//•• Date:
As required:

Control room data supplied

by: •-"•,•_ • ,•r Revision 2 December

2005 DLB 49 via on-site, email, or fax.ENTEC SERVICES, INC. METER ORIFICE

AND

TEMPERATURE CHECKS Client: "•re/

•ri•_12, Date: •- •-o"7 Meter Box Number:.

•- 13 Odginal &H@"

/,•'oo Location:

/.•/'=m

•'J'l•./j •' Barometric Pressure:

• • .•'7

"Hg Original Y: O. Bi-Annual Calibration

Date: RUN METER

FOR EXACTLY

10.0 MINUTES Orifice Manometer Reading &H equal to •H @

Dry Gas Volume,

ft :• Dry Gas Meter Inlet Temperature, °F Dry Gas Meter Readings:

Initial

Final

Initial

Final /, •'0

,•.. •'oo Total Volume: Vm = Volume

of Dry Gas Meter (,3Average:

&5

Tm= Average

Temperature

of Dry Gas Meter in degrees

Rankin

(+460) PBarm = Barometric

Pressure Dry Gas Meter Outlet Temperature, °F Initial Final (,3 Average:

Yc = 10NmX

•/{ 0.0319

X mm/PBarm}

= 10/( •7.(.,•/o

)X•/{0.0319X( 'E,,•¥

)/(,•8.•'7

)} =(/. "•oq

) x (o.7•/

)= o.q•'4 Is Y¢ < +/- 3% of Original

Y ?./V• • Thermocouple Check

(all temperatures

are in o F) NIST Traceable

ID •'/2_.7-.7q/•

• Thermocouples I I.D. ..Stack (Post Required) Probe / -•'S •- •&• Filter Box / • •-/z/ Filter Exit l'T'(_.- / ff"

•-• 3' Meter Outlet / •'- ,/•

• / Impinger Exit / (•/L/• /

• / Other / Field Checks

Performed

By (Signature): Ambient

Temp.

Reference

Temp.

•0

Acceptance

Range

OK?
+/- 7.5 o +/- 5.4 o +/- 5.4 o +/-2.0 o +/- 5.4 o +/-2.0 o +/- 5.4 o

Revision September

2005 DLB 5•N/TEC SERVICES, INC. ORSAT STANDARDIZATION Client: Source: "•.'•Ia

•" Orsat/,• Leak Check: Date of Test: Date of Standardization: •-/Z-o

7 Orsat / • ID #:

Vendor Gas Calibration

Gases Tank I
02 O• Concentration, (%) Carrier Gas Container Type Cylinder ID # Date of Expiration •S Tank 2
COz
•5

Tank 1 1 Actual

Net co, #_,.o

i•.o

2 Actual Net/•.0

3 Actual Net/•.0 Average Net Volume

Known Value

Difference

0.007
Tank 1 2 Actual COz 3.o 02

Net
/•'.o

2 Actual /•'.o, Net

3 Actual

/•o Net•.o/f.o Difference must. be less than ;•

•.•/•

ANALYST (Signature

I Date): Average Net Volume

Known Value 002.

Difference

a.ooZ

51Calibration complies

with ISO 17025 Traceable® Certificate

of Calibration

for Lollipop
Instrument Identification: Cert. No.:4378-1154572 Thermometer

Model: 06-664-27

S/N: 51227962

Manufacturer

Control Company Standards/Equipment: Description Then•istor Module Temperature Probe Temperature Probe Temperature Calibralion

Bath TC179 Temperature Calibration

Bath TC 191

SeriaJ Number

Due Date A17118 7130105 128 10118/05 157 7/26/05 A45240 A42238

NIST Traceable

Reference A4730038 A4A12029 A4715025 Certificate Information: Technician: 104

Procedure:

CAL-03 Test Conditions:

24.0°C

48.0 %RH 1017 mBar

Cal Date: 7/22/05

Ca/Due:

7/22/07 Calibration Data: (New Instrument) u.it(s• Nominal °C"c Nominal

As Left In TOl Min 100.010 99.6

Y

99.6

Max

±uc 0.4 0.059 100.4 0.059

TUR >4:1 >4:1 This Instrument

was calibrated using Instruments

Traceable to National Institute of Standards

and Technology.

Wallace 8e(ry. Technica• Maintaining Accuracy:
In Out Opimon cahbrate(I your Lollipop Therrr:,•meter should maintain =ts accuracy. There exact way to •lelem'•ne how long cah•ration w=ll be mamlained. Lo•lipol• Ther•l"etets c•ange httle. •f an), at all. but be affected by aging, temperature, shcck, and COntarr•'nabOn. Recalibration: For factoR/cahOra£=cn

and re-certification Iraceable to Nelioaal tnsl=tule of Standards and Techno•cgy contact Conv(•! Company.

CONTROL COMPANY

4455 Rex Road Friendswood,

TX 77546 USA Phone 281 482-1714

Fax 281 482-9448

service@control3.com

www.control3.com Control Ccrrpany

ISO 17025 Cal=bratien Laboratory Acctedded by (A2LA) American Assoc,allon for Labora(o•j Accreddat•o•. Cen•ca=e No. 750.0 ConVo• Ccmpa•y ISO 9001 Ouahty Cedified by (DNV) Oet Ncrs•e Ve•tas, Centflcace No. CERT-0•805-AQ-HOU.

52Certificate of Analysis

Date of Analys•s: Custon•er Na•e: Grade of Product:

7/14i2005
PRIMARY

STANDARD

Reference

N,Jmber: Part Number"

87-t 10858887-5 X03N•82P15AC226 C_ylinder Number CC2t4t39

.Compot•ent RequeSte• Actual[ CARBON DIOXIDE

3.000 %

3.002 % OXYGEN • 5.00 %

t4.97 % NITROGEN Balance Balance Notes:Re•at_!,,f.e..,Unc .e..t!.alD..ty

of A..n_a|ytical!

va•e:. +t, 1% of component

or +f- 0,02% of absolute, wNch ever is lower. Primaj•/Standard gas mixtures

are traceabte

to N.I.S.T weights

and/or N,I.S,T gas mixture reference materials,

I / Ap•c, va.i Si.gnalute

j

•'L...•...

53Certificate of Analysis

Date o• Analys•s: Custo•er Name Grade of Product:

7•"t4J2005
PRIMARY

STAN DARD Refere•ce

Nu•'#ber" Part Number:

87-i t0858887-4 XO3NI81 P15AC225

CC2"t4•47 Component Requested Concentration Actua| Concentr_•_ti_o•R OXYGEN 3.00(} %

2.993 % CARBON DIOXIDE

t6.00 %

15,£7 % NITROGEN Ba•anc• 8afar•ce Notes: Relative Uncertait•t3t.

of.Analytical

Value: +!- 4% of component

or +t- 0,02% of absolute, which ever is lower, Primary Standard

gas mixtures

a• traceable

to N.I.S.T weights

and/or N.f.S.T gas mixture reference •tedals.

54E

EENTEC SERVICES,

INC FIELD QA / QC CHECKLIST Method 6C Sulfur

Dioxide

CLIENT: "•:•:•.•-•..• LOCATION:

I.•--•

C•-•-• SOURCE TESTED:

"--I•T,-•- F •%,&.P---E.

•PE CONTROL

DEVICE: TEST METHODS

USED:

• • I• • MODIFICATIONS

TO METHOD:

Was valid Interference

Check (sum of responses

< 2.5 % of calibration

span) on site? 2 Was valid Certificate

of all Protocol 1 calibration

gases on site? 3 Was the High-level

gas equal to the calibration

span ? 4 Was the Mid-level gas between 40 and 60 % to the calibration

span ? 5 Was the Low-level

gas < 20 % of the calibration

span ? 6 Was the sample kept above the dew point by heating pdor to the sample conditioner

? 7 Was the Analyzer Calibration

Error within +/-2 % or +/- 0.5 ppm of the calibration

span for all calibration gases ? 8 Was the System Bias within +/-2 % or +/- 0.5 ppm of the calibration

span for all calibration gases ? 9 Was the System Response

Time Calculated

during the initial sampling system bias check? What was the System Response

Time ?

•.E;>

Seconds 10 Was the Drift within +/-3 % or +/- 0.5 ppm of the calibration

span for the low-scale and upscale gases ? 11 Was the sampling system purged > 2 times the system response time before each test run? 12 Was the minimum time at each sampling point > 2 times the system response time ? 13 Was the sample flow rate within 10 % of the flow rate established

during the system response time check for each run ? •1 I.•,"• Flow rate:

,L/, • liters/minute 14 Was a stratification

test performed

before the first run ? What were the results of the stratification

test? All points were: Within +/- 5 % or +/- 0.5 ppm of mean for 1-point sampling (unnstratified) Within +/- 10 % or +/- 1.0 ppm of mean for 3-point sampling (minimumally

stratified) Some points were > 10 % or 1.0 ppm of mean for 3-point sampling (stratified) 15 Was a Multi-point

or 3 point probe used ? 16 Was the flow rate from each point verified to be within 10 % of the mean flow rate for each run ? 17 Were all data points recorded in at least 1 minute averages? 18 Was the average concentration

foleach run < the calibration

span ? Signature (Test Team Leader): Date:ENTEC SERVICES,

INC FIELD QA / QC CHECKLIST Method 10- Carbon

Monoxide

CLIENT: SOURCE TESTED:

"-'J•T,..• F- -•'i•.,• TEST METHODS

USED: LOCATION: TYPE CONTROL

DEVICE: MODIFICATIONS TO METHOD:

Was valid Interference

Check (sum of responses

< 2.5 % of calibration

span) on site? 2 Was valid Certificate

of all Protocol 1 calibration

gases on site? 3 Was the High-level

gas equal to the calibration

span ? 4 Was the Mid-level gas between 40 and 60 % to the calibration

span ? 5 Was the Low-level

gas < 20 % of the calibration

span ? 6 Was the sample kept above the dew point by heating prior to the sample conditioner

? 7 Was the Analyzer Calibration

Error within +/-2 % or +/- 0.5 ppm of the calibration

span for all calibration gases ? 8 Was the System Bias within +/-2 % or +/- 0.5 ppm of the calibration

span for all calibration gases ? 9 Was the System Response

Time Calculated

dudng the initial sampling system bias check? What was the System Response

Time ? 1 •t:>

Seconds 10 Was the Drift within +/-3 % or +/- 0.5 ppm of the calibration

span for the low-scale and upscale gases ? 11 Was the sampling system purged > 2 times the system response time before each test run? 12 Was the minimum

time at each sampling point > 2 times the system response time ? 13 Was the sample flow rate within 10 % of the flow rate established

during the system response time check for each run ? •,[ • Flow rate: •,'•

liters/minute 14 Was a stratification

test performed

before the first run ? YE•S

NO

What were the results of the stratification

test? All points were: Within +/- 5 % or +/- 0.5 ppm of mean for 1-point sampling (unnstratified) Within +/- 10 % or +/- 1.0 ppm of mean for 3-point sampling (minimumally

stratified) Some points were > 10 % or 1.0 ppm of mean for 3-point sampling (stratified) 15 Was a Multi-point

or 3 point probe used ? 16 Was the flow rate from each point verified to be within 10 % of the mean flow rate for each run ? 17 Were all data points recorded in at least I minute averages? 18 Was the average concentration

for each run < the calibration

span ? 19 Was an integrated

bag sample used to analyze CO ? Signature (Test Team Leader):'--•• •-.,-•_ Date:
5?Date 7/16/2004 Analyzer Model West. Research 721AT Component SO2 Analyzer Serial No.

7700-1 Span 0-1000ppm Cylinder ID

Test Gas

SG9120994 SO2

Interference

Response

Test

Concentration Analyzer

Response

Difference

% of Span

213 203 -10

-1.00
SG9120994 CO

495 SG9120994 CO=

9.76 SG9120994 02

20.79

Total 10

1.00 *Specification (EPA Method 20)" Sum of interference

responses

must not exceed 2% of span % of Span

Analyzer Response

X 100 Instrument Span

58Date Analyzer

Model Component Analyzer Serial No. Span

7/16/2004 API-300 Carbon Monoxide 866 0-1000 ppm

Interference

Response

Test

Cylinder ID

CC123630 CC123630 CC123630 CC172148 CC172148

Test Gas
SOz
CO02CO2

Concentration

2005OO 20.9 10.08

Analyzer

Response

499

Difference

-1.0

% of Span

-0.10

O2 10.05

Total 1.00

0.10 *Specification (EPA Method 20) Sum of interference

responses

must not exceed 2% of span % of Span

Analyzer Response

X 100 Instrument Span

59ENTEC SERVICES,

INC. METHOD 26A SAMPLE

RECOVERY

DATA SHEET Client / Location:

_Boral Bricks Sampling

Date(s):_3-14-2007 Run No.:

1 Impingers 1

Recovery

Date: 3/14/2007 2 3

4

Recovered

By: LB 6 Silical Gel Final Wt. Initial Wt. Net Weight

18010080

122t0022

105

t03 100 100 5 3 873.9 860.9
Description of Impinger

Contents: Description of Particulate

on Filter: Silica Gel Color: Filter I.D. Number: Probe Rinse Container

No.: Impingers 1(0.1N HzSO4)ContenLs

Container No.: Impingers 2(0.1N H2SO4)Contents

Container No.: Impingers 3(0.1N NaOH)Contents

Container No.: Impingers 4(0.1N NaOH)Contents

Container No.: Run No.: Impingers

2

Recovery

Date: 1 2

3

Total Moisture

123.0

Grams Sealed: Y N Percent Spent:

/' •" % Filter Container

No.: Liquid Level Marked I Sealed:

Y N Liquid Level Marked

Sealed:

(•) N Liquid Level Marked

Sealed:

Y N Liquid Level Marked / Sealed:

Y N Liquid Level Marked I Sealed:

Y N 3/14/2007 4 5 Recovered

By: LB 6 Silical Gel Final Wt. Initial Wt. Net Weight

179

127 100 100 79 27

1051005

1041004 817.9

Description of Impinger

Contents: Description of Particulate

on Filter: Silica Gel Color: Filter I.D. Number: Probe Rinse Container

No.: Impingers 1(0.1N H=SO•)Contents

Container No,: Irnpingers 2(0.1N HiSO•)Contents

Container No.: Impingers 3(0.1N NaOH)Contents

Container No.: Impingers 4(0.1N NaOH)Contents

Container No.: Total Moisture

130.2

Grams Sealed: Y N Percent Spent:

//•"

% Filter Container

No.: Liquid Level Marked / Sealed:

Y N Liquid Level Marked / Sealed:

•) N Liquid Level Marked

Sealed:

Y N Liquid Level Marked I Sealed:

Y N Liquid Level Marked I Sealed:

Y N Run No.:

3 Impingers 1

Recovery

Date: 31t412007 3 4 Final Wt. Initial Wt. Net Weight

182

136 100 100 82 36

100

105 100 100 0 5

Recovered

By: LB 6 Silical Gel 885

Description of Impinger

Contents: Description of Particulate

on Filter: Silica Gel Color: /H •'•,• • Filter I.D. Number: Probe Rinse Container

No.: Impingers 1(0.1N H=SO•)Contents

Container No.: •.• Irnpingers 2(0.1N HzSO•)Contents

Container No.: Impingers 3(0.1N NaOH)Contents

Container No.: Impingers 4(0.1N NaOH)Contents

Container No.: BLANKS: Probe Rinse: Total Moisture

134.1

Grams Sealed: Y N Percent Spent:

/ • % Filter Container

No.: Liquid Level Marked

Sealed:

Y N Liquid Level Marked / Sealed:

• N Liquid Level Marked Sealed:

Y N Liquid Level Marked I Sealed:

Y N Liquid Level Marked

Sealed:

Y N 0.1N H2S04:

X 0.1N NaOH:

Filter:ENTEC SERVICES, INC LABORATORY SAMPLES

QA / QC CHECKLIST

SOURCE TESTED: ANALYSIS: IAr--I RECOVERED BY: SAMPLING

DATE(S):

3-/z-i'- 07 METHOD(S): ,/"• •, RECOVERY DATE:

• -/•-(}7 Description of Impinger

Content F Test Run No.'s 1: •/¢•r"

2: •i•r

3: Impinger Contents

Container

Number: Test Run No.'s 1:

• "/

2: J'2.- 2.

3: Samples Sealed and Stored in Secure Container?

(•3or N Liquid Level Marked?

•or N Filter ID Number:. Test Run No.'s 1:

/L/.•

2: /•tA

3: Description of Particulate

on Filter: Test Run No.'s 1:

A,/,•

2:

/'I/A

3: Filter Container

Number: Test Run No.'s 1:

N,,•

2:

A],,•

3: Samples Sealed and Stored in Secure Container?

¥ or N Probe Rinse Container

Number: Test Run No.'s 1: /D/A

2: ,•.iA

3: Samples Sealed and Stored in Secure Container?.

Y or N Liquid Level Marked?

¥ or N Probe Rinse Reagent:

•',•

Lot Number. Laboratory Blanks: Probe Rinse:

Impinger:

•

Filter: Were samples

analyzed

by Entec Services,

Inc.? Y or N If not, Laboratory

Performing

Analysis: Other:

*** If using outside

laboratory

services

please fill out the following

chain of custody. Signature: /..,.__

/•

Date" )tint Name:,

•.-,,..,-...

,2•

Time (24hr): Signature (Project Manager

or,T• •

••

Rev•ien 2 Septem•r

2005 TLj 62Environmental Tesang Laboratory, 305 Crawford $•reet Fairfield, • 35064 (205) 785-1750 Lab Invoice

#: 24131

•lient: Mr. Tom Lotz Entee Services,

Inc. 16D Commerce

Avenue Hueytown, AL 35023 Date: March 22, 2007
Project Name: Boral Bricks Project Number:

27109 Project Location:

N/A P.O. Number:

N/A Sample Matrix: Liquid Sampled By: L. Beane Date Collected:

March 14, 2007 Test Method:

'WIethods

for Chemical

Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600/3-83. LIQUID ASSAYS Lab LD.: 7136(; Run 1Diff Run2 Diff Run 3 Diff i!i!•!

!|iii!•!i!it!ii!i•iiiiliiii!•iii!iiiii•.•t.!iiiii .•.............._. ;:;:;:: :•:• TotalHCL 11.4210.7810.81 ]O-02Totalmg

/ 300.0 [21-Mar-07[

1345 ] MD i I 1345 I MD -.V..°.!....•.....e............................... I. 3..9.0. ! .4!.5. I. 3..7.5. .I. .m L [iiiiiiiiiii!i!i|21-Mar-07| 1345 |

L :i i:i ::i:i :i:i:i:i:i:i:i:•:i:i:i:i:

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: i:i: :i:i:i:i:i:•:i:" !:!iii•il

::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::

!::i !:i!:i:i iii!! ::i

ii iiiiii ::: l•eld LD.: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::

:i:!:i:i:!:!:!:i:i:i:i:i:i

:! i:i!i i:i:!:i:i:i:i:..:i:i:!:i:i:!:i:i:i:i:i:i:,

!:!:i:!:i:!:i:!:i: :i::: :::::::::::::

::::::::i:::i:!: ! | • ot•'•C• •O• li::ii!!ili!ii!iiii::iiiiiiiitiiiiiii!iiiiiiiiiiii!i!::i:: 0.02mg/L

300.0

21-Mar-07

1345

MD TotalHF BDL !!i!ii!i!iiiiiiiiiii::!iii!iitliii!!iiiiiiiiiiii!i!iiiii 0.02mg/L

300.0

21-Mar-07

1345

lVlD !!i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:il:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i :::::::::::::::::::::::::: Detection limit, practical BDL=Bdow Detection

Limit

Respectfully

submitted,

President ADEM Laboratory

Certification

I.D.# 40710 63Environmental

Testing Laboratory, 305 Crawford S/feet Fairfield, AL 35064 (•os) 7ss4•so •.lient: Mr. Tom Lotz Entec Services, Inc. 16D Commerce

Avenue Hueytown, AL 35023 Lab Invoice

#: 24131

Date: March 22, 2007
Project Name: Project Location: Sample Matrix: Sampled By: Lab Analyst: Test Method:

Boral Bricks Project Number:

27109 N/A P.O. Number:

N/A Liquid L. Beanc Date Collected:

March 14, 2007 MD Date/Time

Analyzed:

March 21, 2007 @ 1345 '•VIethods for Chemical

Analysis of Water and Wastes", EPA-600/3-83.

Method 300.0. QUALITY CONTROL

DATA ERA Minerals

Reference

Control Lot #P128506 Chloride Assayed:

114 mg/L Flouride Assayed:

1.89 mg/L Range: 101-124 mg/L Range: 1.47-1.97 mg/L

Respectfully submitted,

Presid•t ADEM Laboratory

Certification

I.D.# 40710 64ENTEC SERVICES, INC. Chain of Custody
Client Contact: Phone No: Lab Name

•//'///•0•/• Lab Invoice # c• •/gl. • / Entec Job No. #

PO #

Samples Collected

by: Send Results to: Phone I Fax Results To:

Tom Lotz lient 205-491-6-676• Time :::', "" ,Analysis.

• Method

•: .! Preservative

PrintName: ///,•,•'/•//

•,•

ITime(24hr):

O• "/ '0 0 PrintName:

,/'>•/ -/:.." :'i :I.RE.L.!NQU.pHEDB :DATE/TIM

E Signature: /•;

,,;/'•'•, Y'•

Date:

,•//L•/i•

Signature: Print Name: • •FJ • •

Time (24hr):

O • • Print Name: RECI,.E•EDBY.

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS

I COMMENTS:

65ENTEC SERVICES, INC. Chain of Custody
Client Contact: Phone No: Project# Lab Name Lab Invoice Entec Job No. Samples Collected by: Send Results to: Phone / Fax Results To:

Tom Lotz •_•O•r Client 205-491-6676 Lab I.D.

Field I.D.

Date

Time

Analysis

I Method

..Preservative

RELINQ•IISHED Signature: Print Name:

/•'-.•

•-•, ,•/

DATE I TIME RECIEVED

BY

Date: 3 116 I07 Signature: Time (24hr):

•/• [:1• Print Name: / -•,%•///•

• •'-•,Y •,•a•,t•-) RELINQUISHED BY

DATE I TIME RECIEVED

BY Signature: Print Name: Date: Time (24hr):

/ / Signature: Print Name:

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS

COMMENTS:

66Analyzer Calibration Error

'est Performed

For: Boral Bdck Union City, Oklahoma Kiln DIFF Exhuast Compliance Date:3114107 Carbon Monoxide

Monitor Calibration Span: 227.0 ppm Cylinder Reference

Gas Number Concentration

% of

Analyzer Calibration Span

Response Test Performed

By: Entec Services, Inc. Birmingham Division Test Trailer 901 Mr. Lynn Beane Runs 1-3 Method 10 Serial Number: API 300 SN 866
Difference Calibration Error (%)

Absolute Difference
XC001059B 0.0 ppm

0.00 %

0.0 ppm

0.0 ppm

0.00 %

0.0 ppm CC14042 118.2 ppm

52.07 %

117.9 ppm

-0.3 ppm

-0.13 %

0.3 ppm CC126574 227.0 ppm

100.00 %

227.4 ppm

0.4 ppm

0.18 %

0.4 ppm Sulfur Dioxide

Monitor Calibration Span: 221.0 ppm Cylinder Reference

Gas

% of

Analyzer Number Concentration

Calibration

Span

Response

Method 6C Serial Number: WR 721AT SN 7700-1
Difference Calibration Error (%)
SG917038 0.0 ppm

0.00 %

0.0 ppm

0.0 ppm

0.00 % SG9166186 90.7 ppm

41.04 %

90.0 ppm

-0.7 ppm

-0.32 % CC91160 221.0 ppm

100.00 %

221.0 ppm

0.0 ppm

0.00 %

Absolute Difference
0.00 % 0.70 % 0.00 %

69aria Drift• 0 0 E E

E E

• 0 0 • o o,

E E

E E

E

0 0 o o

E E O.• •.. 0 0

• 0 O0 0

E E
0 0

E

0 0 0 0

0 0 ¢..0

E •

E0 0 0 •0

E o.

E

0 0 o o

O_O_0 0 03

r•o o o'• oo

I=E E

E E

o oo

E E o_

E E

E E

o

E E o.o.. o o

O
E E

E E o_

E E o.

733434 Route 22 West, Branchburg,

New Jersey 08876 USA ISO 9001:2000
Shipped from: 80 Industrial

Drive, Alpha, NJ 08865 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS EPA PROTOCOL

MIXTURE PROCEDURE#: GI CUSTOMER: Cherokee

Instruments

Inc.

CYLINDER

# CC-126574 SGI ORDER #

0094106 CYLINDER

PRES: 2000 PSIG ITEM# 3 CGA OUTLET:

350 P.O.# 7962 CERTIFICATION DATE: 08/14/06 EXPIRATION DATE:

811412009 CERTIFICATION HISTORY

DATE OF

MEAN

CERTIFIED

ANALYTICAL COMPONENT ASSAY

CONCENTRATION

CONCENTRATION

ACCURACY Carbon Monoxide 227 ppm

+/- 1% 08/04/06 08/14/06 227.6 ppm 227.3 ppm

BALANCE Nitrogen PREVIOUS CERTIFICATION

DATES: None REFERENCE STANDARDS COMPONENT Carbon Monoxide

SRMINTRM# GMIS-1

CYLINDER# CC-90770

CONCENTRATION 506 ppm

INSTRUMENTATION COMPONENT MAKE/MODEL

SERIAL #

DETECTOR

CALIBRATION DATE(S) Carbon Monoxide

Horiba VIAo510

570423011

NDIR

08114106

THIS STANDARD

IS NIST TRACEABLE.

IT WAS CERTIFIED

ACCORDING

TO THE EPA PROTOCOL

PROCEDURES. DO NOT USE THIS STANDARD

IF THE CYLINDER

PRESSURE

IS LESS THAN'I$0 PSIG.

ANALYST: •C)'/• ¢;•'•
DATE:

08/14/06 CHERYL PATINO

Tel:

+1 908-252-9300

Fax: +1 908-252-0811 www.spectragases.com
75Certificate of Analysis Cylinder Number:

CC14042 Cylinder Pressure:

2000.6 PSIG Certification Date: 6/27/2006 Certified Concentrations
MONOXIDE EPA Protocol

Gas Mixture Reference Number: Expiration Date: Laboratory:

83-124068198-5 6/27/2009 ASG Port Allen LA Component Concentration

Accuracy

Analytical Principle

Procedure 118.2 PPM

+/- 1%

NonDispersive

Infrared

G1 NITROGEN Balance Certification performed

in accordance

with "EPA Traceability

Protocol (Sept. 1997)" using the assay procedures

listed. Analytical Methodology

does not require correction

for analytical

interferences. Notes: Do not use cylinder below 150 psig.

Approval

Signature Reference Standard

Information TvDe Balance Gas Component NTRM 82636

NITROGEN

CARBON MONOXIDE Analytical Results 1st Component

CARBON

MONOXIDE 1st Analysis Date: 06/20/2006 R 246.5

S 119.0

Z 0.5

Conc S 119.5

Z 0.0

R 249.0

Conc Z 0.0

R 249.0

S 120.0

Conc AVG: ,C¥1.Number

Concentration XC013304B 246.2 PPM

118,0 PPM 118.5 PPM 119.0 PPM 118,5 PPM 2nd Analysis Date: 06/27/2006 241.5 S 116.0

Z0.0

Conc 117.9 PPM 116.0 Z 0.0

R 242.5

Conc 117.9 PPM 0.0 R 242.5

S 116.5

Conc 118.4 PPM AVG: 118.0 PPMAirgas Certificate of Analysis:

EPA

Protocol

Gas Mixture Cylinder N umber:

SG9166186 Cylinder Pressure:

2000.6 PSIG Certification Date: 6/26/2006 Certified Concentrations Component SULFUR DIOXIDE NITROGEN Reference

Number: Expiration Date: Laboratory:

83-124068198-2 6126/2008 ASG Port Allen LA Airgas Specialty Gases 1075 Cinclare 0rive Porl Allen, LA 7076"[ (225) 388-0900 FAX: (225) 388-0959

Concentration Accuracy

Analytical Principle

Procedure 90.70 PPM

+/- 1%

FTIR G1 Balance Certification performed

in accordance

with "EPA Traceability

Protocol (Sept. 1997)" using the assay procedures

listed. Analytical Methodology

does not require correction

for analytical

interferences. Notes: Do not use cylinder below 150 psig.

Approval

Signature Reference Standard

Information Type Balance Gas NTRM 81694

NITROGEN Analytical Results 1st Component

SULFUR

DIOXIDE st Analysis Date: 06/19/2006 R 0.650

S 0.602 S 0,603

Z 0.000 Z 0.001

R 0.650

Component

C¥1.Number SULFUR DIOXIDE

XC017671B

Z 0.001

Conc 90.56 PPM R 0.650

Conc 90.74 PPM S 0.602

Conc 90.62 PPM AVG: 90.64 PPM 2nd Analysis Date: 06/26/2006 0.650 S 0.603 0.603 Z 0.001 0.000 R 0.648

Z 0.001

Conc 90.63 PPM R 0.649

Conc 90.77 PPM S 0.602

Conc 90.92 PPM AVG: 90,77 PPM

Concl•'ntration 98.0 PPM

7?•3434 Route 22 West, Branchburg,

New Jersey 08876 USA ISO 9001:2000 Shipp• • 880•i•t'E•iv•pR•p

h•l, 0¢•6•886 5 RECERTIFICATION OF ANALYSIS EPA PROTOCOL

MIXTURE PROCEDURE #: G2 CUSTOMER: Cherokee

Instruments

Inc. SGI ORDER •

0079806 ITEM# 8 P.O.# 7445 CERTIFICATION DATE: 11/14/05 EXPIRATION DATE:

11/14/2008 CYLINDER

# CC.91160 CYLINDER PRES: 2000 PSIG CGA OUTLET:

660

CERTIFICATION HISTORY

DATE OF

MEAN

CERTIFIED

ANALYTICAL COMPONENT ASSAY

CONCENTRATION

CONCENTRATION

ACCURACY Sulfur Dioxide

10/23/03

222.0 ppm

221 ppm

+/- 1% 11/14/05 220.2 ppm

BALANCE Nitrogen PREVIOUS CERTIFICATION

DATES: 10/23/2003

by Spectra Gases REFERENCESTANDARD• COMPONENT SRM/NTRM#

CYLINDER#

CONCENTRATION Sulfur Dioxide

GMIS-1

CC-135535

202 ppm

INSTRUMENTATION COMPONENT Sulfur Dioxide

MAKE/MODEL Horiba VIA-510

SERIAL # 851221093

DETECTOR NDIR

CALIBRATION DATE(S) 10118/05

THIS STANDARD

IS NIST TRACEABLE

IT WAS CERTIFIED

ACCORDING

TO THE EPA PROTOCOL

PROCEDURES. DO NOT USE THIS STANDARD

IF THE CYLINDER

PRESSURE

IS LESS THAN 150 PSIG.
ANALYST: F

/ DATE:

11/14/05 FRED PIKULA

Tel:

+1 908-252-9300

Fax: +1 908-252-0811 www.spectragases.com
78SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL

EQUIPMENT

CALIBRATIONS All of the emission

testing

equipment

used was calibrated

according

to the procedures outlined in the EPA CFR 40 Part 60 Appendix

"A" and the Quality Assurance

Handbook for Air Pollution

Measurement

Systems,

Volume

III, EPA-600/4-77-027b. Type-S Pitot tube Calibrations The pitot tubes used for flow velocity

measurement

were checked

for dimensions

to verif• a pitot coefficient

Cp of 0.84. Documentation

of the calibration

and calibration check for dimensional

measurements

is provided. Saml•linq Nozzle

Calibration Sampling nozzles

were checked

visually

for nicks or damage

and for dimensional calibration prior to testing

by measuring

the nozzle diameter

in at least three planes using a Vernier

micrometer.

Measurements

must agree to within +0.004-inches. Documentation is provided

on the individual

data sheets. Temperature Measuring

Device

Calibration• Each temperature

sensor

(stack gas, dry gas meter, and impinger

exit) and readout was calibrated

at a minimum

of two points over the anticipated

range of use against

a NIST-traceable mercury-in-glass

thermometer.

All sensors/readouts

were calibrated prior to field sampling.

Stack gas thermocouples

must agree within 1.5% (expressed

in OR) of the reference

thermometer

through

out the entire calibration

range.

Dry gas meter thermocouples

must agree within +5.4°F and impinger

exit .thermocouples

must agree within +2°F. Documentation

is provided. Dry Gas Meter Calibrations Dry gas meters

were fully calibrated

against

a set of calibrated

orifices.

After assemb!y and leak checking,

the console's

pump is allowed

to run for 15-minutes

to warm up the dry gas meter and pump.

For a pre-test

full calibration,

data are collected

at five (5) orifice manometer

(L•H) settings

of approximately:

0.32, 0.67, 1.2, 2.0, and 319 inches of H20. Gas volumes

of at least 5 ft 3 are used at all the orifice settings

and critical vacuums were obtained

at all of the calibration

points.

The individual

gas metercorrection factors

(y•) are calculated

for each orifice setting and averaged.

The method requires that each of the individual

correction

factors

fall within +2% of the average correction factor, or the meter be cleaned,

adjusted

or repaired

and recalibrated.

The orifice pressure

differential

(/•H@) that equates

to 0.75 cfm of air at 68°F and 29.92 inches Hg is calculated

and along with the average

correction

factor (y) is marked

on the meter console. Analytical Balance

Calibration The analytical

balance

used to weigh particulate

filters and desiccated

rinse samples

is calibrated by comparing

its readings

against

NIST Class 1 weights,

with acceptable agreement within ±0.5 mg. The field moisture

gain balance

was also compared

to NIST Class 1 weight,

with acceptable

agreement

within + l gm.0TYPE S PITOT

TUBE

INSPECTION

DATA

SHEET

LEVEL

Tube OO

Certification Parameter Assembly Level? Holes Damaged? Obstructed?

Value YesNoNo00

Y

A Z=Asiny W=Asin 0 PA

PA- PB D•- Thermocouple Cal. Thermocouple Cal.

Allowable

Range YesNoNo -10 < c•1 < +10 -10 < c•2 < +10 -5 < I•1 < +5 -5 < •2 < +5
%':' .:''•. ::", .-• ::..: !-::•: :!..:.";: ::!::•::::::.. ,..:: ...,:.:,.....•;..• 90 .•::,!:::.:.;: :.. : .,ii:ii..:,,'.."!..: .988 for 114" OD, 0.526 to 0.750 for 3/8" OD, 0.788 to 1.125 0 Z =_< 0.125" 0 W _< 0.031" .494 .4940.3757070 for 1/4" OD, 0.263 to 0.375 for 3/8" OD, 0.394 to 0.563 for 114" OD, 0.263 to 0.375 for 3/8" OD, 0.394 to 0.563 -0.063 to 0.063" 0.188 to 0.375" Reference temp. Probe Thermocouple certify that the Type S pitot tube/probe

ID # ESP- 62B meets or exceeds

all specifications, criteria and/or applicable

design features

and is hereby assigned

a pitot tube calibration

factor Cp of 0.84

Certified and Calibrated

By: Date Certified: Lalan R. Kirby 12/2912006 Annual Calibration

83ENTEC Services,

Inc.
16-D Commerce Ave.Hueytown,

Alabama 35023 Calibration Date:

1/8/2007 Calibrated by:

Tom Lotz
Annual Thermocouple

Calibrations •!: ,,-: •;:,...,•.+..•;;; :•: :•+_-:.;• .::-::--...:--;•;..-::.-:.

.:i..--.•- ;•;:;•¢::;.

,.-•. ._;. .::, Entec Services

Temperature

**Reference

Thermocouple

Difference

Within ID Number

Source

Temperature

Temperature

De•lrees F

Tolerance TC-1 ambient

6O

61 Yes TC-2 ambient

60

61 Yea TC-3 ambient

60

61 Yes TC-4 ambient

60

61 Yes TC-6 ambient

60

61 Yes TC-7 ambient

60

61 Yes 6O ambient ambient 60 TC-8 Yes TC-11 60

61 Yes TC-12 ambient

60

61 Yes TC-13 ambient

60

60

0

Yes TC-14 ambient

60

60

0

Yes TC-15 ambient

60

61 Yes TC-16 ambient

60

61 Yes TC-17 ambient

61

62 Yes ambient 61 6160 TC-19 Yes TC-20 ambient 61 Yes TC-21 ambient

60

61 Yes TC-22 ambient

60

61 Yes TCo23 ambient

60

61 Yes TC-24 ambient

61

61

0

Yes TCS ambient

60

60

0

Yes ambient ambient ambient TCS 2 TCS 3 TCS 4 TCS 5 TCS 7

TCS 9 TCS 10 TCS 11 TCS 12. TCS 13

ambient ambient

ambient ambient ambient ambient

60606O6161CI6161616161

60606O

ambient TCS 14

ambient TCS- 15

ambient TCS- 16

ambient Fluke Hand Held Fluke Hand Held 2 6161616161616161 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Ye• Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 61 61

0

Yes 61 61

0

Yes 61 61

0

Yes 61 60 Yes 61 0

Yes 0 Yes ambient ambient ambient Fluke Hand Held 3 6161

61 Temperature tolerance within +/- 2 F of acceptable ranges for all thermocouples, Note: NIST Traceable Digital Thermometer

Serial Number 221243179 was used as reference temperatureENTEC Services,

Inc.
16-0 Commerce Ave.Hueytuwn,

Alabama 35023 Calibration Date:

1/2/2007 Calibrated by:

Tom Lotz :;•'•,.:::,.,•;;.,:;.'•1.•.::.I::•.:,:,'.:::.,:;.;:.:::.;:; :•.;•;•- •- ;-:_;

•. •:: •:• •.:•:

•.• :•:;:-..: :.•f., Annual Hot Box The•o•uple

Calibrations 111 Entec Services

Temperature

**Reference

Thermocouple

Difference

Within ID Number

Source

Temperature

Temperature

Degrees F

To;e•a•ce HOTBOX ambient

66

67 Yes HOTBOX 2 HOTBOX 3 HOTBOX 4 HOTBOX 5 HOTBOX 6 HOTBOX 7 HOTBOX 8 HOTBOX 9 HOTBOX 10 HOTBOX 11 HOTBOX 12 HOTBOX 13 HOTBOX 14

ambient ambient ambient ambient ambient ambient ambient

66666666666666 ambient 66 ambient 66 ambient ambient 6666 ambient 66 ambient 66

6766656767 Yes 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes 66 0

Yes 66 0

Yes 65 Yes 65 Yes 67 Yes 676567 Yes Yes Yes remperature tolerance within +1- 2 F of acceptable ranges for all thermocouples. Note: NIST Traceable Digital Thermometer

Serial Number 221243179 was used as reference temperature

85ENTEC Services,
16-D Commerce Ave.Hueytown,

.&!•h_•_ma 35023
Calibration Date:

1/2/2007 Calibrated by:

Tqm Lotz

--- :%-': Annual Gooseneck

Thermoc•uple

Calibrations •:.-• Entec Services

Temperature

**Reference

Thermocouple

Difference ID Number

Source

Temperature

Temperature

Degrees F GN-1 ambient 65 GN-2 ambient GN-3 GN-4 GN-5 GN-6 GN-7 GN-8 GN-g GN-10 GN-11 GN-12 GN-13 GN-14 GN-15 (Mini HB) GN-16 (Mini HB) GN-17 GN-18 (Mini HB) GN-19 (Mini HB) GN-20 (Mini GN-21 GN-22 (Mini HB

ambient ambient ambient ambient ambient ambient ambient ambient ambient

64646464646464

656565646363 Within Tolerance Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 Yes Yes Yes 64 63 Yes 64 65 Yes 64 64

0

Yes 65656363 64 ambient 64 ambient 64 ambient 64 ambient ambient Yes Yes Yes Yes 64 64

0

Yes 64 65 Yes 64 63 Yes 64 64 64 ambient

65656565 64 ambient ambient ambient

0

Yes Yes Yes Yes ambient 64 ambient 64 Yes Temperature tolerance within +/- 2 F of acceptable ranges for all thermocouples. Note: NIST Traceable Digital Thermometer

Serial Number 221243179 was used as reference temperatureNomenclatuNOMENCLATURE

ACFM Bw•C.C•&H&Pdscf E/Btu FK.MnM•M•PbarP•P.•PMR P•P•dQstu
TVlcTVwstd Tm[stdV•c Cross-sectional

area of stack, square feet Cross-sectional area of nozzle, square feet Actual cubic feet of gas per minute at stack conditions Proportion by volume of water vapor in gas stream Particulate concentration

in stack gas, gr/dscf Particulate concentration

in stack gas, gr/acf Pitot tube coefficient Pressure drop across orifice meter, inches water Velocity head of stack gas, inches water Cubic feet of dry gas corrected

to standard

conditions Excess Air Particulate Emission

Rate, pounds/mmBtu F-factor, 9640 dscf/MMBTU's

of heat input Constant (85.49) Total particulate

matter collected,

mg Molecular weight of stack gas; dry basis, Ib/Ib-mole Molecular weight of stack gas; wet basis, Ib/Ib-mole Percent of isokinetic

sampling Barometric pressure,

inches mercury Stack static pressure,

inches of water Barometric pressure

of dry gas meter, in. mercury Particulate mass rate, pounds/hour Absolute stack gas pressure,

inches mercury Barometric pressure,

standard

conditions,

29.92 inches Hg Volumetric flow rate, actual conditions,

ACF/min Volumetric flow rate, standard

conditions,

scf/min Volumetric flow rate, dry standard

conditions,

dscf/min Theoretical water vapor in the gas stream based on saturated

stack conditions,

proportion by volume (dimensionless) Theoretical volume of water collected

based on saturated

stack conditions,

ml Theoretical volume of water vapor in the gas sample based on saturated

stack conditions, corrected to standard

temperature

and pressure,

scf Absolute average dry gas meter temperature,

degree R (460) Absolute average stack gas temperature,

degree R (460) Absolute temperature

at standard

conditions,

528 R Total sampling

time, minutes Total volume collected

in impingers

and silica gel, gr

Vmstd VsYwsgstd Wim•Ws•¥ Volume of gas sampled

through gas meter, cubic feet Volume collected

at stack conditions

through nozzle, ACF Stack gas volume sampled,

ACF Volume of gas sampled

through gas meter, cubic feet Average stack gas velocity, feet/sec Volume of water vapor in gas sampled from impingers,

standard

cubic feet Volume of water vapor in gas sampled from silica gel, standard

cubic feet Total volume collected

in impingers,

gr Total volume collected

in silica gel, gr Dry gas meter calibration

factor

89TEST CALCULATIONS EQUATIONS 1. Ps=Pbar+(Pg/13"6) •,•o•O•

)+ "==',2.•

/13.6): 2. Pm= P,,r *(•H/13.6)

2 •.•7

+ 2-•?

/13.6) 3. V•=17.•*V•*Y*(P•) 17.64"(•.•

)*( .• 4a. V•c(•) 0.04706

W,•p

0.04706*(

•l•

)= 4b. V•s•(=,)

0.04715

W,•

0.04715*(

t$, e.,=V.,,,Z(Vm,,,+ V.,,,)

5.3 9

Y( 5e. 5 For saturated

sources

(No. 6 8 only): 6. TBw•= (106"37"{28271('m*365)}/Ps 10637"{2827/(

.364,8))/( 7. TVwst,•= Vmstd*( TB•/1- TBws) )*(

)/( 1 8. TVIc= TVwstJ0.04707 / Md 0.44(%CO2)+0.32(%O2)+0.28((100-(%CO2+%O2)) 0.44(

:•

)*0.32(

|'i'.•

)+0.28(100-(

•

* 10. M•=Md(1-Bws)+18B•s= ( •-I•

)*(1- .•/4

)+18( 11. V,= 85.49 C•* q•P • •s / (Ms* Ps)] Q•=V•*A•*60 31,•]

)( I•.•

)(60)= 12.13.14. Qs Qa* (528/Ts)*(PJ29.92) ( 5(35•4•

)*(528/ "•. 5 )*( Zl•.•5.,•

/29.92) =.Zl3•} Q=•= Q, (1- Bws) (528•,)*(P•29.92)

=( •

)(1- {•4 )*(528/7G•.•

)*(•.•/29.92) C•=0.01543*(M•Vm•) 0.01543*(

{,•

/ •0•

)= •.•

• 17. E/Btu= (Cs/7000)*{(Fd*20.9)/(20.9-%O2)} /7000)*{( )'20.9)/(20.9-( )} 18. %EA= 100%* {(%O2)-0.5*(%CO)}

/ (0.264(%N2)

(%02)+ 0.5*(%CO)} 10•%*{( )-0.5(

)} / {0.264(

)-( 21 .•PM

22. Vn=Ts/P,*{(0.002669)

V•c + (V•n Y Pm)/Tm)} ('•. • /•,t•5,}

)*{(0.002669)(

•2.• )+( -•o(•l•

)( oO• 23. C,=0.01543"

(Mn/Vn)

0.01543"( / •4.t• 24. I=Vnl00/(60*e*V,*A,) = •4,.111:•

)100/(60)(

(m•)(

•lo•'•

)+o.5( )*(6o/7ooo)

)=