alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 73725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20605]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[OMB Control Number 1205-0NEW]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Emergency Request To 
Reinstate Prior Approved Forms Affecting the H-2A Temporary 
Agricultural Labor Certification Program and Agricultural Recruitment 
System

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of 
Labor.

ACTION: General notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (DOL) will be submitting the following 
information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for emergency review and approval in accordance with the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA). DOL is requesting OMB approve 
this emergency revision by September 12.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Overview of This Information Collection

    Title: Reinstatement of Prior Approved Forms Affecting the H-2A 
Temporary Agricultural Labor Certification Program and Agricultural 
Recruitment System
    OMB Number: 1205-0NEW
    Abstract: DOL uses Form ETA-9142A and Forms ETA 790/790A to meet 
its statutory and regulatory responsibilities for administering the H-
2A program. Similarly, DOL uses Forms ETA 790/790B to administer the 
Agricultural Recruitment System (ARS).
    Employers seeking to use the H-2A program to employ nonimmigrant 
workers to perform agricultural services or labor on a temporary or 
seasonal basis must submit a completed agricultural clearance order 
(Forms ETA790/790A) and Application for Temporary Employment 
Certification (Form ETA 9142A) electronically through the Office of 
Foreign Labor Certification's Foreign Labor Application Gateway (FLAG) 
system. Employers seeking to employ U.S. workers through the ARS 
intrastate and interstate job clearance system must submit a completed 
agricultural clearance order (Forms ETA 790/790B) to the applicable 
State Workforce Agency.
    The emergency PRA clearance requested will allow DOL to utilize 
prior approved Forms ETA 790, 790A, 790B, and 9142A, which is necessary 
to ensure continuity in administering the H-2A program and the ARS 
nationwide. Within the 6-month period following emergency approval, DOL 
will seek public comment on the information collection package as 
provided under 5 CFR part 1320 and the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Jos[eacute] Javier Rodr[iacute]guez,
Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training, Labor.
[FR Doc. 2024-20605 Filed 9-6-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4510-FP-P
# Europeiska unionens C 271A/18 a

| | ISSN 1977-1061 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 271A |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 58 årgången18 augusti 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1061

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 271A

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

58 årgången18 augusti 2015

---

| Informationsnummer | Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Rättelser |
| 2015/C 271A/01 | Rättelse till meddelandet om allmänna uttagningsprov — Konferenstolkar (AD 5/AD 7) — Epso/AD/311/15 – Tjeckiskspråkiga tolkar (CS) — Epso/AD/312/15 – Kroatiskspråkiga tolkar (HR) — Epso/AD/313/15 – Litauiskspråkiga tolkar (LT) — Epso/AD/314/15 – Maltesiskspråkiga tolkar (MT) ( EUT C 224 A, 9.7.2015 ) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

Rättelser

2015/C 271A/01

Rättelse till meddelandet om allmänna uttagningsprov — Konferenstolkar (AD 5/AD 7) — Epso/AD/311/15 – Tjeckiskspråkiga tolkar (CS) — Epso/AD/312/15 – Kroatiskspråkiga tolkar (HR) — Epso/AD/313/15 – Litauiskspråkiga tolkar (LT) — Epso/AD/314/15 – Maltesiskspråkiga tolkar (MT) ( EUT C 224 A, 9.7.2015 )

( EUT C 224 A, 9.7.2015 )

1

---

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

Rättelser

| 18.8.2015 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CA 271/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2015

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CA 271/1

---

Rättelse till meddelandet om allmänna uttagningsprov

Konferenstolkar (AD 5/AD 7)

Epso/AD/311/15 – Tjeckiskspråkiga tolkar (CS)

Epso/AD/312/15 – Kroatiskspråkiga tolkar (HR)

Epso/AD/313/15 – Litauiskspråkiga tolkar (LT)

Epso/AD/314/15 – Maltesiskspråkiga tolkar (MT)

(
  Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 224 A av den 9 juli 2015
  )

(2015/C 271 A/01)

På sidan 1, ska det

i stället för:

”
  Sista ansökningsdag: den 11 augusti 2015 kl. 12.00 (lokal tid Bryssel)
  ”

vara:

vara

”
  Sista ansökningsdag: den 18 augusti 2015 kl. 12.00 (lokal tid Bryssel)
  ”

På sidan 5 ska det

i stället för:

i stället för

”NÄR OCH VAR KAN JAG ANSÖKA?

Du gör en webbansökan via Epsos webbplats http://jobs.eu-careers.eu senast

den 11 augusti 2015 kl. 12.00 (lokal rid Bryssel)
  ”

vara:

vara

”NÄR OCH VAR KAN JAG ANSÖKA?

Du gör en webbansökan via Epsos webbplats http://jobs.eu-careers.eu senast

den 18 augusti 2015 kl. 12.00 (lokal tid Bryssel)
  ”

---
#### GALLAGHER v. STATE.

No. 20964.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 3, 1940.

R. Temple Dickson, of Sweetwater, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the sale of two half pints of whisky to a Liquor Control Board agent, and by the jury fined the sum of $250.

There are no bills of exception in the record. We do find a statement of facts, and upon a perusal thereof it is evident that appellant stoutly denied such sale, and corroborated such denial by other witnesses. There is evident a sharp contradiction of the State witnesses’ testimony. This, however, was a matter to be solved by the jury, and we have no disposition nor reasonable grounds for disturbing their judgment therein.

*816We find many matters complained of in.this trial set forth in the motion for a new trial, but same are not brought before us in a proper bill of exceptions, and they can not be considered by this court.

Finding no error herein, the judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David W.
Wallis, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                    |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ David W. Wallis
|Name:               |  | David W. Wallis                      
|Title:              |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:               |  | April 9, 2010
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Star Multi Care Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen
Sternbach, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report containing the financial statements for the Company fully
            complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
            Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                 By /s/ Stephen Sternbach
                                   -------------------------------------------
                                         Stephen Sternbach
                                         Chairman of the Board, President and
                                         Chief Executive Officer
[Cite as State v. Davis, 134 Ohio St.3d 592, 2012-Ohio-5761.] 

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. DAVIS, APPELLEE. 

[Cite as State v. Davis, 134 Ohio St.3d 592, 2012-Ohio-5761.] 

Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Howard. 

(Nos. 2012-1514 and 2012-1528—Submitted December 4, 2012—Decided 

December 7, 2012.) 

APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, 

No. 97636, 2012-Ohio-3570. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of 

State v. Howard, 134 Ohio St.3d 467, 2012-Ohio-5738, 983 N.E.2d 341. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, 

LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. 

__________________ 

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel T. 

Van and James M. Rice, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant. 

Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Cullen Sweeney, 

Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. 

_______________________
#### SOUTHWESTERN GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.

No. 458.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Aug. 3, 1940.

Arnold & Arnold, of Texarkana, Tex., for petitioner. '

Charles Fahy, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and Robert B. Watts, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition to review order of National Labor Relations Board dismissed without prejudice, on motion of petitioner.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2467 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2467

  To direct the Joint Committee on the Library to obtain a statue of 
      Shirley Chisholm for placement in the United States Capitol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 28, 2018

 Ms. Harris (for herself, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Booker, Mr. Blumenthal, 
 Mr. Nelson, Ms. Duckworth, Ms. Klobuchar, Ms. Warren, Mr. Kaine, Mr. 
Schumer, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Coons, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Durbin, Ms. Smith, 
and Mr. Brown) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Joint Committee on the Library to obtain a statue of 
      Shirley Chisholm for placement in the United States Capitol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLACEMENT OF STATUE OF SHIRLEY CHISHOLM IN UNITED STATES 
              CAPITOL.

    (a) Obtaining Statue.--Not later than 5 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Joint Committee on the Library shall enter 
into an agreement to obtain a statue of Shirley Chisholm, under such 
terms and conditions as the Joint Committee considers appropriate 
consistent with applicable law. The Joint Committee may authorize the 
Architect of the Capitol to enter into the agreement and related 
contracts required under this subsection on its behalf, under such 
terms and conditions as the Joint Committee may require.
    (b) Placement.--The Joint Committee on the Library shall place the 
statue obtained under subsection (a) in a suitable permanent location 
in the United States Capitol.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this Act, and 
any amounts so appropriated shall remain available until expended.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000074697
<NAME> OCLI
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                           2,799
<SECURITIES>                                     3,803
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,229
<INVENTORY>                                     15,886
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,194
<PP&E>                                          91,611
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,804
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 169,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,179
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,357
<COMMON>                                        62,537
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   169,834
<SALES>                                        169,417
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               169,417
<CGS>                                          106,009
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,838
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,690
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,483
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,391
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .73
        

</TABLE>
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 271A/18 a

| | ISSN 1977-0944 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 271A |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 58° anno18 agosto 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0944

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 271A

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

58° anno18 agosto 2015

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Rettifiche |
| 2015/C 271A/01 | Rettifica al bando dei concorsi generali — Interpreti di conferenza (AD 5/AD 7) — EPSO/AD/311/15 — Ceco (CS) — EPSO/AD/312/15 — Croato (HR) — EPSO/AD/313/15 — Lituano (LT) — EPSO/AD/314/15 — Maltese (MT) ( GU C 224 A del 9.7.2015 ) | 1 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

Rettifiche

2015/C 271A/01

Rettifica al bando dei concorsi generali — Interpreti di conferenza (AD 5/AD 7) — EPSO/AD/311/15 — Ceco (CS) — EPSO/AD/312/15 — Croato (HR) — EPSO/AD/313/15 — Lituano (LT) — EPSO/AD/314/15 — Maltese (MT) ( GU C 224 A del 9.7.2015 )

( GU C 224 A del 9.7.2015 )

1

---

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

Rettifiche

| 18.8.2015 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CA 271/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2015

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CA 271/1

---

Rettifica al bando dei concorsi generali

Interpreti di conferenza (AD 5/AD 7)

EPSO/AD/311/15 — Ceco (CS)

EPSO/AD/312/15 — Croato (HR)

EPSO/AD/313/15 — Lituano (LT)

EPSO/AD/314/15 — Maltese (MT)

(
  Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea C 224 A del 9 luglio 2015

  )

(2015/C 271 A/01)

A pagina 1:

anziché:

«
  Termine ultimo per l’iscrizione: 11 agosto 2015 alle ore 12:00 (mezzogiorno), ora di Bruxelles
  »

leggi:

leggi:

«
  Termine ultimo per l’iscrizione: 18 agosto 2015 alle ore 12:00 (mezzogiorno), ora di Bruxelles
  »,

a pagina 5:

anziché:

anziché:

«COME E QUANDO PRESENTARE LA CANDIDATURA

Occorre iscriversi per via elettronica collegandosi al sito dell’EPSO http://jobs.eu-careers.eu entro la seguente data:

11 agosto 2015
  alle ore 12:00 (mezzogiorno), ora di Bruxelles
  .»

leggi:

leggi:

«COME E QUANDO PRESENTARE LA CANDIDATURA

Occorre iscriversi per via elettronica collegandosi al sito dell’EPSO http://jobs.eu-careers.eu entro la seguente data:

18 agosto 2015 alle ore 12:00 (mezzogiorno), ora di Bruxelles
  .»

---
Order entered April 24, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01544-CR

BRANDY NICHOLE CROWE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-34211-X

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s April 22, 2019 motion for extension of time to file her 

brief. We GRANT this motion.

1 Appellant’s brief shall be due THIRTY DAYS from the date of 

this order.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE

 

1 We remind counsel of the specific requirements our rules place on motions to extend time. See Tex. R. App. P. 

10.5(b) (“Contents of Motion in General. All motions to extend time, except a motion to extend time for filing a 

notice of appeal, must state: (A) the deadline for filing the item in question; (B) the length of the extension sought; 

(C) the facts relied on to reasonably explain the need for an extension; and (D) the number of previous extensions 

granted regarding the item in question.”).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-630

In Re: LINDSAY CRAWFORD,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(CA-97-148-3-V, CR-94-41-V)

Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 5, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lindsay Crawford, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

On August 31, 1998, Lindsay Crawford filed this petition for

writ of mandamus seeking to have this court direct the district

court to act on Crawford’s motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. §

2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). The district court entered an order

in the § 2255 proceeding on May 22, 1998. Finding no unreasonable

delay, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0013 Directorate ID : 2010 - SW - 043 - AD Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A. Model AB139 and AW139 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 72 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : This proposed AD was prompted by laboratory

tests which revealed a potential fault in the overvoltage protection on a certain part - numbered generator control unit. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 42,384 Labor per Helicopter (4 x $ 8 5 /work- hour) $ 340 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 42,724 Total US Fleet Cost $ 3,076,128 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Isthe AD signifi cant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Mark Wiley
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SILICON GAMING, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,097
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,043
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,552)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,306
<PP&E>                                          18,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (10,001)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,839
<BONDS>                                         42,156
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,666
<COMMON>                                        57,588
<OTHER-SE>                                     (84,881)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,368
<SALES>                                          5,661
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,661
<CGS>                                            4,219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,566
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,926
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,040)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9,040)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9,040)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.64)
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-173-CV

IN RE ROGER KERBOW AND	RELATORS

KERBOW & ASSOCIATES	

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

	Relators shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL A:  CAYCE, C.J.; HOLMAN and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED:  May 31, 2007