alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
September 30, 2003 (the Report), by Xybernaut Corporation (the Registrant),
the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and                      
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.

|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ EDWARD G. NEWMAN                   
|Edward G. Newman                       
|Chief Executive Officer and            
|Chairman of the Board of Directors     
|November 13, 2003                      
|                                       
|/s/ THOMAS D. DAVIS                    
|Thomas D. Davis                        
|Senior Vice President and              
|Chief Financial Officer                
|November 13, 2003                      
|                                       
|/s/ STEVEN A. NEWMAN                   
|Steven A. Newman                       
|President, Chief Operating Officer and 
|Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors
|November 13, 2003                      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Xybernaut Corporation and will be retained by Xybernaut Corporation, and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00091-CR

Lee J. Chernoff, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 06-276-K368, HONORABLE BURT CARNES, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s motion to withdraw his notice of appeal is granted. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). The motion to issue the mandate is also granted. The motion for additional time to file the

reporter’s record is dismissed.

The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: July 26, 2007

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Q of MeriStar Hospitality
Corporation (the Registrant) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated
below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and



2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Date: August 5, 2005



/s/ DONALD D. OLINGERDonald D. Olinger Chief Financial Officer
MeriStar Hospitality Corporation
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 19

- 00040

- CV

MATTHEW MARK HESLEP

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008

- 1531

- C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Matthew Mark Heslep, appeals from an “Order to Withdraw Funds”

signed by the trial court on August 24, 2018. By letter da ted February 22, 2019, the Clerk

of this Court notified appellant that the appeal is subject to dismissal because the original

filing fee had not been paid and warned appellant that the Court would dismiss the

appeal unless, within ten days from the date o f the letter, appellant paid the filing fee or

obtained indigent status for the purpose of appeal. Ten days have passed, and appellantH eslep v. State Page 2

has not paid the filing fee for this appeal or obtained indigent status. Accordingly, we

hereby dismiss this appeal. S ee T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

JOHN E. NEILL

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed March 13, 2019

[CV06]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.                          ( print page 75551)    

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers.                    

*Date:*                         October 21-22, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Maurizio Grimaldi, M.D., Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of Aging, National Institute of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rm. 2C218, Rockville, MD 20892, 301-496-9374,                         *grimaldim2@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 10, 2024.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-20949 Filed 9-13-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMEDICS
DETECTION INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 28,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          45,714
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,171
<INVENTORY>                                     11,126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,905
<PP&E>                                           5,994
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,639
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,022
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,335
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,242
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,639
<SALES>                                         17,839
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,826
<CGS>                                            8,521
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,973
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,445
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    43
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 623
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,065
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,626
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,439
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,439
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Heywood Wilansky, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year endedJanuary 29, 2005 of Retail Ventures, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b.  [Reserved]  c.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Dated: April 18, 2005 By:  /s/  Heywood Wilansky    Heywood Wilansky, President andChief Executive Officer
2009 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

1-14-2009

Garcia v. Atty Gen USA

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 07-2164

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2009 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Garcia v. Atty Gen USA" (2009). 2009 Decisions. Paper 1960.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009/1960
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 07-2164

 

ROSALBA ROA GARCIA,

Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES,

Respondent

____________

ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF

THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS

(BIA No. A74-872-805)

____________

ORDER

On October 28, 2008, the Court issued an opinion in the above entitled petition for

review. Judge Fuentes had submitted a dissenting opinion for filing but due to an error in

processing, the dissenting opinion was not filed with the majority opinion.

Accordingly, at the direction of the Court the opinion and judgment filed on

October 28, 2008 are hereby vacated. The Clerk shall docket the revised opinion and

judgment. It is noted that the Respondent has filed a petition for panel rehearing and

rehearing en banc. Within 10 days from entry of the revised opinion and judgment, the

Respondent may file a supplement to the petition for rehearing or inform the Clerk in

writing that supplementation is not required and that Respondent shall rely on the petition

for rehearing as originally submitted.

Action by the Court on the petition for rehearing is deferred pending a response by

the Respondent in accordance with this order.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Dated: January 14, 2009
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 24, 2011

h0516 

# Order

May 24, 2011

142592

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142592 COA: 293201 Wayne CC: 08-016400-FH KENNETH ANDRE HILL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 13, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court No. DA 20-0399 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. WILLARD DEAN MCCAULOU ,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until September 10th , 2021 to prepare, file and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 12 2021

08/12/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0399
Fw:Changes to MT Regional Haze Public Hearing Dates Changes to MT Regional Haze Public Hearing Dates

Monica Morales Monica Morales to: Crystal Freeman 04/12/2012 01:42 PM

Cc: Vanessa Hinkle, Sara Laumann

For the MT RH docket.

Monica S. Morales, Unit Chief

Air Quality Planning Unit

Air Program (8P-AR)

U.S. EPA Region 8

1595 Wynkoop Street

Denver, CO 80202-1129

phone (303) 312-6936

fax (303) 312-6064

----- Forwarded by Monica Morales/R8/USEPA/US on 04/12/2012 01:35 PM -----

From: Monica Morales/R8/USEPA/US

To: Don_Shepherd@nps.gov, "Sorkin, Jeff" <jasorkin@fs.fed.us>, Patricia_F_Brewer@nps.gov, 

Sandra_V_Silva@fws.gov, Tim_Allen@fws.gov, baanderson02@fs.fed.us, "Dzomba, Thomas C 

-FS" <tdzomba@fs.fed.us>, Carol_McCoy@nps.gov

Cc: Vanessa Hinkle/R8/USEPA/US@EPA, Sara Laumann/R8/USEPA/US@EPA, Steve 

Odendahl/R8/USEPA/US@EPA, Elyana Sutin/R8/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 03/23/2012 09:05 AM

Subject: Changes to MT Regional Haze Public Hearing Dates

Hi,

I wanted you all to know, as soon as possible, that we had to change the dates for the public hearings in 

Montana for the Regional Haze proposed action. We realized that we have to ensure that following a 

public hearing that the comment period remains open for at least 30 additional days. Due to the deadline 

for signing our final action, we could not allow more than 60 days for public comment, so we have moved 

the hearing dates to May 1st in Helena and May 2nd in Billings. We will be in the same locations. 

However, the large room at the library in Helena is not available until 1:30 pm, so the public hearing will 

be held from 2-5:30 pm and 6:30-9:00 pm. The hours for the Billings hearing are the same as before. 

Sorry for the change. 

These changes will be reflected in the notice that is published in the Federal Register . 

Monica S. Morales, Unit Chief

Air Quality Planning Unit

Air Program (8P-AR)

U.S. EPA Region 8

1595 Wynkoop Street

Denver, CO 80202-1129

phone (303) 312-6936

fax (303) 312-6064
Request for Additional Information - Peak 3 LLC 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Melms: 

 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA-2015-2406). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s) (i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, 

lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the 

maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the 

aircraft manual(s). 

 Your petition references the material listed below, however the material was not 

submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

 Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM)

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request 

any further, we must receive the information described above by 9/10/2015. If we do not 

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us (202) 267-9677.

 

Sincerely,

 

Jake Troutman

 

Thank you for your interest in aviation safety. 

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 1:24 PM 

To: peak3llc@gmail.com 

Cc: May, Rick (FAA) 

 

Request for Additional Information - Peak 3 LLC Page 1 of 1

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note... 8/26/2015
**Exhibit 24.05**

**AMBAC FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.**

**Power of Attorney**

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned officer of Ambac Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby constitutes and appoints eachof **Anne Gill Kelly**and**Kevin J. Doyle,** as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the **Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2008**, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange, and any and all amendments thereto, and any and all instruments and documents filed as a part of or in connectionwith the said **Form 10-K** or amendments thereto, and does hereby grant unto each said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about thepremises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each said attorney-in-fact and agent shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has subscribed these presents as of this 25th day of February 2009. 

/s/    Sean T. Leonard                

Sean T. Leonard
#### TAYLOR v. STATE.

No. 17471.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 3, 1935.

Willis, Studer & Studer, of Pampa, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is keeping a building for storing intoxicating liquor; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for three years.

It was charged in the indictment, in substance, that on the 5th of August, 1934, in Gray county, appellant kept and maintained a room, house, and building where *“intoxicating liquor*was kept, possessed and sold in violation of law.” (Italics ours.) For the reasons stated in Offield v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 75 S.W.(2d) 882, the indictment is fundamentally defective.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved j>y the court.