alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICT Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 20004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Vincent A. Paccapaniccia, Executive Vice President, Corporate Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |                                                                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|April 28, 2004 |  | /s/ Vincent A. Paccapaniccia                                           
|               |  | Vincent A. Paccapaniccia                                               
|               |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICT Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Brennan, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                 |  |                        
|---------------- |  | -----------------------
|November 7, 2008 |  | /s/ John J. Brennan    
|                 |  | John J. Brennan        
|                 |  | Chairman, President and
|                 |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### NUNN v. STATE.

No. 19946.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 16, 1938.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 25, 1939.

L. D. Johnston, of Waxahachie, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was charged with a violation of the liquor laws in a dry area, and upon her trial she was fined the sum of $100.

The statement of facts is not signed and approved by the county judge trying the case, and can not be considered by us. However, there appears in the record two bills of exception complaining *670relative to the sufficiency of the testimony on account of -the fact that the purchaser, an agent of the Liquor Control Board, had at a previous trial hereof identified as the person from whom he purchased' the whisky a sister of appellant, one Jimmie Nunn. The court, in his qualification of such hill;-shows that upon call of the case he directed appellant’s attorney to produce the defendant and place her before the jury. That at such time Jimmie Nunn came forward, and a jury was selected, and the witness identified Jimmie Nunn as the person who had sold him the whisky, and said such person stated at such time that her name was Eloise Nunn. Upon conclusion of the State’s testimony appellant’s attorney then produced appellant, and the agent purchaser then said he was mistaken as to Jimmie Nunn, and that she was not the person who sold the whisky, but that Eloise Nunn was such person; that they looked much alike, but when placed together he could'tell the difference; that Jimmie Nunn had bumps on her face. A mistrial resulted in such case, and in this trial no such mistake occurred.

Bill No. 2 reflects the fact that the purchasing witness stated that he purchased this bottle of whisky at the Greeri Lantern Cafe, whereas the facts showed that he bought same at the Mandy Nunn Cafe. The witness admitted such mistake, but the judge in his qualification states that these cafes were side by side, and a large sign was shown for the Green Lantern Cafe, which was hung in such a position that it was hard to tell which cafe was 'which.

These bills are both taken to a refusal of the court to direct a verdict of acquittal herein because of the insufficiency of the testimony on account of the contradictions of the purchasing witness’ testimony, and the above excerpts are taken from the court’s qualification thereto. These alleged discrepancies would only go to the weight of the witness’ testimony, and not to either its admissibility or sufficiency.

We see no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

After reviewing the record in the lights of the appellant’s motion for rehearing, we are constrained to adhere to the conclusion expressed in the original opinion.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.
#### FLETCHER v. STATE.

No. 17436.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 20, 1935.

B. W. Baker, of Carthage, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty.; of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of murder, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The indictment seems to be sufficient to charge the offense of which the appellant was convicted. The appellant’s bills of exception cannot properly be appraised by this court in view of the fact that no statement of facts appears in the record.

No fundamental error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

*322PE® OURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-11-0619 SAT Date: 9/16/2011 Print Date: 10/3/2012

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 1 2 1 1 1

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: MUTA; LIVER; KIDNEY; AQUATOX
Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-11-0619-20 FATE: Estimations for log Kow = -9.66 (E) log Koc = 1.64 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E) log Fish BAF = -0.05 (E) FATE: Estimations for log Kow = -2.38 (E) log Koc = 0.00 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)log Fish BAF = -0.05 (E) PMN Substance: Solid S > 10 g/L at 25 C (E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via biodeg; 90 via biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk; wk Sorption to soils/sediments = low; low PBT Potential: P1B1; P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = rapid; rapid

Health : Health Summary: N ot absorbed from the skin, absorbed from the lung ( p che m ), absorbed from the GI tract (analog). Concern for mutagenicity, liver, and kidney toxicity based on data reviewed for [rat 90-d oral (diet) N OEL = 2400 p p m (170 mg/kg/d M, 240 mg/kg/d F)].

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 >100 daphnid 48-h LC50 >100 green algal 96-h EC50 20 fish

_ chronic value >10 daphnid

_ chronic value >10
algal

_ chronic value 7.7 ACR 2.6
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SAR-nearest analog method for MW 323; solid (P) with mp = unk °C (P); S > 450 g/L at 20 C (M); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; DWhardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DWTOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 770

SARsSAR Class
Ecotox Category

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
### combustionsurvey

- Fw: ERC comments

-----Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/ 16/2011 03:51PM -----
To: Toni Jones/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Brian Shrager/RTP/U SEPA/US@EPA From: "Ted Michaels" <tmichaels@energyrecoverycounc il.org> Date: 07/14/2011 04:42PM Cc: <aszurgot@covantanergy.com>, "'Brasowski,Leon'" <LBrasowski@CovantaEnergy.com>, <tporter@wm.com> Subject: ERC comments (See attached file: 110714 BMACT CISWI reconsiderat ion comments.pdf) (See attached file: 101129 SSI MACT comments.pdf) (See attached file: 101129 SSI MACT Comments attach ment.xls)

Please find attached correspondence on the Petition for Administrative Reconsideration and Amendment of Industrial Boiler MACT and CISWI Rules. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best,

Ted Michaels

Ted Michaels

President
Energy Recovery Council

1730 Rhode Island Avenue, NW

Suite 700
Washington, DC 20036

202-467-6240
tmichaels@energyrecoverycouncil.org
www.energyrecoverycouncil.org 

### From: Brian Shrager <Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov> To: <combustionsurvey@erg.com> Date: 7/16/2011 3:52 PM Subject: Fw: ERC comments Attachments: 110714 BMACT CISWI reconsideration comments.pdf; 10 1129 SSI MACT comments.pdf;

101129 SSI MACT Comments attachment.xls 

## Page 1 of 2

8/2/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpw ise\4E21B3A5DO

...

### = 

## Page 2 of 2

8/2/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpw ise\4E21B3A5DO

...
**Topics for 111(d) discussion with EPA**

Tuesday, September 29 2PM EST/11AM PST 1. Brief o verview of BPA’ s role and hydro operations in the Pacific Northwest – system network/system sales are coordinated regionally and are not state based. a. Implications of using 2012 as the baseline year b. In the Clean Power Plan can EPA acknowledge the value and role of hydropower as a GHG free resource? 2. Hydro efficiency upgrades – will upgrades to the federal hydro projects count as renewable resources towards state goals? 3. Building Block IV: Energy Efficiency a. Consumer- owned utilities in the NW are very engaged in capturing energy efficiency and work closely with BPA to do so. BPA has m easurement and v erification protocols in place . Would it be useful to the EPA for BPA to describe energy efficiency reporting requirements, which we believe ensure the energy efficiency savings are real and measured ? b. In the NW we value the carbon reductions due to energy efficiency not based on our existing resource mix, but rather on the marginal resource mix. BPA’s primary governing statute (NW Power Act of 1980) defines energy efficiency as a resource , that is, energy effi ci ency “generates” megawatts because it avoids the need to build/run a physical resource . Thus, energy efficie ncy extend s the value of our GHG -free hydro system. The draft EPA rules are contrary to this. If analytically, the marginal resource approach doesn’t work for EPA’s rules, would EPA consider setting a fixed GHG reduction value for every MWH of energy efficiency captured in the country? 4. Reliability concerns - to what extent has the EPA studied reliability impacts or transmission system capacity due to coal plant closures and increased renewables? Where does EPA envision this reliability impact analysis happening? 5. Can EPA count renewable resource development and energy efficiency captured before 2017? 6. The Columbia River hydro system has reached its limits on integrating new wind . How does EPA e nvision integrating the significant increase of renewables (especially wind), given the significant decrease in fossil fuels that will be available to balance the system for integration?” 7. How would a mass - based goal be calculated?
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 8, 2004


BETWEEN CHRISTOPHER RILEY AND


TICKETMASTER L.L.C.


 


This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of January 4,
2008, with regard to that certain Agreement dated as of December 9, 2004, between
Christopher Riley and Ticketmaster L.L.C. (as amended, the “Agreement”).  All capitalized terms used herein without
definition will have the meaning given them in the Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the parties wish to change Employee’s title with the Company
and Employee’s salary and extend the term of the Agreement and change Employee’s
and InterActiveCorp address; and


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.                                       Notwithstanding
anything in Section 1A of the Agreement to the contrary, Employee will be
employed by the Company as Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel.


 


2.                                       Section 2A
of the Agreement (Term of Agreement) is hereby superseded and replaced in its
entirety as below:


 


“The term (“Term”) of the Agreement shall commence on the Effective
Date and continue until January 10, 2010, unless sooner terminated in
accordance with the provisions of Section 1 of the Standard Terms and
Conditions attached hereof.  For the
avoidance of doubt, the parties’ post-termination obligations including but not
limited to the confidentiality, covenant not to compete, consulting,
non-solicitation of employees, and non-solicitation of clients provisions in
the Agreement shall survive the Term of Employee’s employment hereunder.”


 


3.                                       Notwithstanding
anything in Section 3A of the Agreement (Compensation) to the contrary,
Employee’s Base Salary is $265,000 per year effective as of January 6, 2008.


 


4.                                       Notwithstanding
anything in Section 4A of the Agreement (Notices) to the contrary,
Employee’s address and InterActiveCorp address will change to the below:


 


InterActiveCorp


555 West 18th Street


New York, New York 10011


Attention: 
General Counsel


 


Christopher Riley


2015 Canyon Drive


Los Angeles, CA 90068


 

















 


5.                                       Except
as explicitly set forth herein, the Agreement will remain in full force and
effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as
of the first date written above:


 


TICKETMASTER L.L.C.


 


 


	
  By:

  	
       /s/

  	
   

  	
    /s/ Christopher Riley

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Christopher Riley
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1802 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1802

  To amend title 5, United States Code, to extend the maximum time a 
                 person may serve as an acting officer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2017

  Mr. Gardner introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to extend the maximum time a 
                 person may serve as an acting officer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TIME LIMITATION.

    Section 3346 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``210'' each place that term appears and inserting ``365''.
                                 <all>
```
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-15T08:40:50Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-15T08:40:51Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-15T08:40:51Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="12741">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-15T08:40:50Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OPINION t O-7464 WAS NEVER ISSUED OR 
</p>
<p>WAS WITHDRAWN. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
I, Gregory B. Sullivan,  the Chief Executive Officer, and Mark Sauder, the Chief
Financial Officer, of Ugly Duckling Corporation, certify that to the best of our
knowledge and belief:  (i) the report fully  complies with the  requirements  of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information  contained in the report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Ugly Duckling Corporation.


                                    -----------------------------------------
                                    Gregory B. Sullivan, Chief Executive Officer


                                    -----------------------------------------
                                    Mark Sauder, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE>                                     5
 <CIK>                                          0001013148
  <NAME>                                        XYBERNAUT CORPORATION

<S>                                             <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
  <PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1999
  <PERIOD-END>                                  Sep-30-1999
  <CASH>                                                299
  <SECURITIES>                                            0
  <RECEIVABLES>                                         714
  <ALLOWANCES>                                           91
  <INVENTORY>                                         6,421
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    8,233
  <PP&E>                                              1,929
  <DEPRECIATION>                                      1,074
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     10,293
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               7,553
  <BONDS>                                                 0
  <COMMON>                                              237
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
  <PREFERRED>                                         7,881
  <OTHER-SE>                                         (5,379)
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       10,293
  <SALES>                                             2,076
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    2,098
  <CGS>                                               1,694
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                                       1,694
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   13,659
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (13,189)
  <INCOME-TAX>                                           55
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (13,244)
  <DISCONTINUED>                                          0
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
  <CHANGES>                                               0
  <NET-INCOME>                                      (13,244)
  <EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.66)
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.66)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ADVANCE
PARADIGM, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          44,124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  153,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                       383
<INVENTORY>                                      8,967
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               208,311
<PP&E>                                          31,698
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 333,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          200,381
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           106
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,269
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   333,500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               850,999
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  823,866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,179
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,427
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,527
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,627
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,627
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .79


</TABLE>