alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,489
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,883
<ALLOWANCES>                                       179
<INVENTORY>                                      2,464
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,577
<PP&E>                                         552,287
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,936
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 608,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,212
<BONDS>                                        234,995
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           189
<OTHER-SE>                                     315,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   608,073
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,819
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,083
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,440
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,376
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,288
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,088
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,088
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.61
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 5.1


(Includes Exhibit 23.1)











August 9, 2019





Securities and Exchange Commission


Division of Corporation Finance


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





Re: Electronic Arts Inc. (“ EA ”)


Registration Statement on Form S-8





Ladies/Gentlemen:





I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of California and I am Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of EA. I have examined EA’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the “ Registration Statement ”) to be filed by EA on or about August 9, 2019 in connection with the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of 13,500,000 shares of common stock that may be issuable by EA to eligible employees and directors of EA pursuant to EA’s 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the “ 2019 EIP ”).





As General Counsel for EA, I have examined the proceedings taken by EA in connection with the 2019 EIP and the shares being registered hereby.





It is my opinion that the 13,500,000 shares of common stock that may be issued and sold by EA pursuant to 2019 EIP, when issued and sold in accordance with the terms set forth in the 2019 EIP, as applicable, will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.





I consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and further consent to all references to this opinion, if any, in the Registration Statement and amendments thereto.





Very truly yours,








/s/ Jacob J. Schatz


Jacob J. Schatz


Executive Vice President,


General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance







Exhibit 10.1




PROMISSORY NOTE




	 	 	 
	$145,000.00

	 	July 10th, 2008






FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Global Clean Energy, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Maker”) promises to pay to
the order of Clean Energy Funding, Inc. (“Lender”), at its principal office, or at such other place as may be
designated in writing by the holders of this Promissory Note (“Note”), the principal sum of ONE HUNDRED FORTY FIVE
THOUSAND 00/100 DOLLARS ($145,000.00) (the “Principal Sum”). The unpaid Principal Sum shall bear interest at 7.5% per
annum and shall be due in twelve (12) months.



All payments to be made under this Note shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America which
shall be legal tender for public and private debts at the time of payment.



In the event that an action is instituted to collect this Note, or any portion thereof, Maker promises to pay all
costs of collection, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys’ fees, court costs, and such other sums as the
court may establish.



In the event of a default under this Note when due, then the holder of this Note, at its election, may declare the
entire unpaid Principal Sum due and payable.



Every provision hereof is intended to be several. If any provision of this Note is determined, by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, such illegality, invalidity or unenforceability shall
not affect the other provisions hereof, which shall remain binding and enforceable.



This Note is made in the State of Texas and it is mutually agreed that Texas law shall apply to the interpretation
of the terms and conditions of this Note.



All agreements between the holder of this Note and Maker are hereby expressly limited so that in no contingency or
event whatsoever, whether by reason of deferment or acceleration of the maturity of this Note or otherwise, shall the
rate of interest hereunder exceed the maximum permissible under applicable law with respect to the holder. If, from
any circumstances whatsoever, the rate of interest resulting from the payment and/or accrual of any amount of interest
hereunder, at any time that payment of interest is due and/or at any time that interest is accrued, shall exceed the
limits prescribed by such applicable law, then the payment and/or accrual of such interest shall be reduced to that
resulting from the maximum rate of interest permissible under such applicable law. This provision shall never be
superseded or waived.


 


1









 





The makers, endorsers, and/or guarantors of this Note do hereby severally waive presentment, demand, protest and
notices of protest, demand, dishonor and nonpayment.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed as of the date first hereinabove set forth.



GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY, INC.



By:                                                      


Kenneth Adessky,


C.F.O



 


2
# Úradný vestník C 271A/18.

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 271A |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Zväzok 5818. augusta 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 271A

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Zväzok 5818. augusta 2015

---

| Číslo oznamu | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Korigendá |
| 2015/C 271A/01 | Korigendum k oznámeniu o verejných výberových konaniach — Konferenční tlmočníci (AD 5/AD 7) — EPSO/AD/311/15 – český jazyk (CS) — EPSO/AD/312/15 – chorvátsky jazyk (HR) — EPSO/AD/313/15 – litovský jazyk (LT) — EPSO/AD/314/15 – maltský jazyk (MT) ( Ú. v. EÚ C 224 A, 9.7.2015 ) | 1 |

Číslo oznamu

Obsah

Strana

Korigendá

2015/C 271A/01

Korigendum k oznámeniu o verejných výberových konaniach — Konferenční tlmočníci (AD 5/AD 7) — EPSO/AD/311/15 – český jazyk (CS) — EPSO/AD/312/15 – chorvátsky jazyk (HR) — EPSO/AD/313/15 – litovský jazyk (LT) — EPSO/AD/314/15 – maltský jazyk (MT) ( Ú. v. EÚ C 224 A, 9.7.2015 )

( Ú. v. EÚ C 224 A, 9.7.2015 )

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

Korigendá

| 18.8.2015 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | CA 271/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2015

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

CA 271/1

---

Korigendum k oznámeniu o verejných výberových konaniach

Konferenční tlmočníci (AD 5/AD 7)

EPSO/AD/311/15 – český jazyk (CS)

EPSO/AD/312/15 – chorvátsky jazyk (HR)

EPSO/AD/313/15 – litovský jazyk (LT)

EPSO/AD/314/15 – maltský jazyk (MT)

(
  Úradný vestník Európskej únie C 224 A z 9. júla 2015
  )

(2015/C 271 A/01)

Na strane 1:

namiesto:

„
  Dátum uzávierky: 11. august 2015 o 12.00 hod. (poludnie) bruselského času
  .“

má byť:

má byť:

„
  Dátum uzávierky: 18. august 2015 o 12.00 hod. (poludnie) bruselského času
  .“

Na strane 5:

namiesto:

namiesto:

„KEDY A KDE SA MÔŽEM PRIHLÁSIŤ?

Prihláste sa online prostredníctvom webovej stránky EPSO http://jobs.eu-careers.eu do:

11. augusta 2015 do 12.00 hod. (poludnie) bruselského času
  .“

má byť:

má byť:

„KEDY A KDE SA MÔŽEM PRIHLÁSIŤ?

Prihláste sa online prostredníctvom webovej stránky EPSO http://jobs.eu-careers.eu do:

18. augusta 2015 do 12.00 hod. (poludnie) bruselského času
  .“

---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PUSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PUSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Form 10-K of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert O. Bond,
President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge (i)  the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, except as otherwise noted under Item 9A(T) therein, and
(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ ROBERT O.
BOND


Robert O.
Bond


President
and Chief Operating Officer


February
26, 2009














This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smith Barney Mid-West Futures Fund L.P. II (the‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the periodending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

/s/ David J.Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President andDirector     Date: August 14,2006

----
#### Leith, Appellant, *v.*Metzger.

*Sheriff’s sales*— Beal *estate*— Distribution *of proceeds*— Mortgage *by claimant of title to real estate*— Judgment *in ejectment against claimant*— Invalidity *of mortgage.*

Where a claimant to the title to certain real estate executes a mortgage thereon and it is subsequently determined in an action of ejectment against him that another person was the real owner of the property, such judgment is conclusive that claimant had no title, and where the property is thereafter sold at a sheriffs sale, such mortgage cannot be considered in the distribution of the proceeds thereof.

Argued March 24, 1916.

Appeal, No. 75, Jan. T., 1915, by Lizzie Metzger, from decree of C. P. Lehigh Co., April T., 1910, No. 273, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report in case of Reuben B. Leith, to the use of Lizzie Metzger, v. Lovina Metzger (now deceased), Julia Schaadt, Executrix.

Before Brown, C. J., Mestrezat, Potter, Moschzisker and Frazer, JJ.

Affirmed.

Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Groman, P. J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

The lower court dismissed the exceptions to the report of the auditor. Lizzie Metzger appealed.

*Error assigned,*among others, was in dismissing exceptions to the auditor’s report.

*Gf. R. Booth,*with him *H. A. Cyphers,*for appellant.

*434
      *James L. SchaoAt,*with him *John E. Hartzell*and *Chas. W. Kaeppel,*for appellee.

April 17, 1916 :

Per Curiam,

The real estate sold by the sheriff belonged to Lovina Metzger, and the only liens against it were those which she had created. The mortgage given by her son, Jacob Metzger, to Reuben B. Leith, for $1,000.00, was no encumbrance upon the property, for the recovery by his mother in the action of ejectment is conclusive that he had no title to any interest in the property at the time of the execution of the said mortgage. It is, therefore, not to be considered in the distribution of the proceeds of the sheriff’s sale. After the payment of the lien indebtedness created by Mrs. Metzger, the balance belonged to her estate, she having died since the sheriff’s sale.

Decree affirmed at appellant’s costs.
**Exhibit 32.1**
**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**
     In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MeriStarHospitality Corporation (the “Issuer”) for the quarterly period ended June 30,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Paul W. Whetsell, Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78mor 78o(d)); and
 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Issuer.        Date:      August 6, 2004 /s/ Paul W. Whetsell   Paul W. Whetsell   Chief Executive OfficerMeriStar Hospitality Corporation
<PAGE>   1


                                   Exhibit 23


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT  

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Value City Department Stores, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-44207, 33-50198,
33-55348, 33-55350, 33-78586, 33-80588, 33-92966, 333-15957 and 333-15961) of
our report dated October 13, 1997, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Value City Department Stores, Inc. for the year ended August 2, 1997.


Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio
October 13, 1997
*OPINION ISSUED DECEMBER 12, 2008*

#### ERNEST W. CAPP VS. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

(CC-08-0149)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Andrew F. Tarr, Attorney at Law, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Claimant brought this action for vehicle damage which occurred when his 2000 Chevrolet Tracker struck a hole as he was driving south on W.Va. Route 2 near Wellsburg, Brooke County. W.Va. Route 2 is a road maintained by respondent. The Court is of the opinion to make an award in this claim for the reasons more fully stated below.

The incident giving rise to this claim occurred at approximately 8:30 p.m. on March 12, 2008. W.Va. Route 2 is a paved, two-lane road at the area of the incident involved in this claim. The posted speed limit is fifty-five miles per hour. As claimant was driving on W.Va. Route 2 at approximately forty miles per hour, his vehicle struck a hole that he estimated was one and a half feet wide. Although claimant travels this road on a regular basis and was aware that there were a series of holes in this area, he was unable to avoid the hole because there was oncoming traffic. As a result of this incident, claimant’s vehicle sustained damage to its undercarriage in the amount of $1,031.31. Since claimant’s insurance deductible at the time of the incident was $500.00, his recovery is limited to that amount.

The position of the respondent is that it did not have actual or constructive notice of the condition on W.Va. Route 2. Craig Sperlazza, Brooke County Administrator for respondent, testified that W.Va. Route 2 is a high priority road in terms of its maintenance. Mr. Sperlazza indicated that the two mile stretch on W.Va. Route 2 where this incident occurred had deteriorated during the winter months. Respondent performed maintenance on this stretch of road on March 2, 2008, March 3, 2008, and March 12, 2008. Respondent’s crews used cold mix and perma patch to fill the holes in this particular area.

The well-established principle of law in West Virginia is that the State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of travelers upon its roads. *Adkins v. Sims,*130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). In order to hold respondent liable for road defects of this type, a claimant must prove that respondent had actual or constructive notice of the defect and a reasonable time to take corrective action. *Chapman*v. *Dep’t of Highways,*16 Ct. Cl. 103 (1986).

In the instant case, the Court is of the opinion that respondent had, at the least, constructive notice of the hole which claimant’s vehicle struck and that the hole presented a hazard to the traveling public. Although respondent had performed maintenance in this area, the attempts to fill the hole proved inadequate at the time of claimant’s incident. Thus, the Court finds respondent negligent and claimant may make a recovery for the damage to his vehicle.

*172In accordance with the findings of fact and conclusions of law stated herein above, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award to the claimant in the amount of $500.00.

Award of $500.00.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on September 15, 2000, Knoll Pharmaceutical Company, 30 North Jefferson Road, Whippany, New Jersey 07981, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed below: Drug
ScheduleDihydromorphine (9145)
IHydromorphone (9150)
II
 The firm plans to produce bulk product and finished dosage units for distribution to its customers. Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration. Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than February 5, 2001. Dated: November 20, 2000. John H. King, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 00-30940 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                OPTICAL COATING LABORATORY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   EXHIBIT 21. SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in 1948. The
Company was reincorporated in California in 1963 and again reincorporated in
Delaware in 1987.

As of October 31, 1999, Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc. had the following
subsidiaries:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  PERCENT OF        PLACE OF
SUBSIDIARY NAME                                                   OWNERSHIP      INCORPORATION
---------------                                                   ----------     -------------
<S>                                                               <C>            <C>
OCLI International Service Corporation...........................    100%          California

OCLI Foreign Sales Corporation...................................    100%                Guam

OCLI Optical Coating Laboratory, Ltd.............................    100%            Scotland

OCLI Optical Coating Laboratory GmbH.............................    100%             Germany

OCLI Optical Coatings Espana S.A. ...............................    100%               Spain

Optical Coating Laboratory B.V. .................................    100%         Netherlands

Optical Coating Laboratory EURL..................................    100%              France

Flex Products, Inc...............................................    100%            Delaware

OCLI Asia K.K....................................................    100%               Japan

OPKOR, Inc.......................................................    100%            New York
</TABLE>