alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

         For  information  concerning the suit filed by Harris Trust and Savings
Bank (as  trustee  for  Ameritech  Pension  Trust)  and others  against  Salomon
Brothers Inc., and Salomon Brothers Realty Corporation, see the description that
appears in the second and third  paragraphs  under the  caption  Item 3.  "Legal
Proceedings" on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. In October 1999,
plaintiffs  filed a petition for certiorari  with the U. S. Supreme  Court.  The
petition  seeks  review of the U.S.  Court of Appeals for the Seventh  Circuit's
decision  reversing the denial of  defendants'  motion for summary  judgment and
dismissing the sole remaining ERISA claim against the Company.

         For information  concerning a purported class action in Florida against
numerous  broker-dealers  including Salomon Smith Barney Inc.  ("SSB"),  see the
description that appears in the sixth paragraph under the caption Item 3. "Legal
Proceedings"  on Form 10-K for the year ending  December  31,  1998.  In October
1999, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint.

         In March 1999, a complaint  seeking in excess of $250 million was filed
by a hedge fund and its investment  advisor  against SSB in the Supreme Court of
the  State of New  York,  County of New York  (MKP  Master  Fund,  LDC et al. v.
Salomon Smith Barney Inc.).  Plaintiffs allege that, while acting as their prime
broker SSB breached its contracts with plaintiffs, converted plaintiffs' monies,
and engaged in tortious  conduct,  including  breaching its fiduciary duties. In
October  1999,  the Court  granted in part and  denied in part  SSB's  motion to
dismiss the complaint.  The court dismissed  plaintiffs' tort claims,  including
the breach of  fiduciary  duty  claims,  but allowed the breach of contract  and
conversion  claims to  stand.  The  Company  intends  to  contest  this  lawsuit
vigorously.

Item 2.     Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

     The Partnership continues to offer units at the net asset value per Unit as
of the end of each quarter. For the three months ended September 30, 1999, there
were additional sales of 941.1904 Units totaling $1,751,000.

     Proceeds  from the sale of  additional  Units  are used in the  trading  of
commodity interests including futures contracts, options and forward contracts.

Item 3.     Defaults Upon Senior Securities - None
Item 4.     Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders -
None
Item 5.     Other Information - None
Item 6.     (a) Exhibits - None
            (b) Reports on Form 8-K - None


                              16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0713

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SILAS CORPRON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 24, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 17 2020

06/17/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0713
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
KARRINGTON HEALTH, INC.FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       6,146,680
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,596,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,937,780
<PP&E>                                      92,060,778
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,840,280
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             109,155,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,743,890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    33,484,712
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,034,866)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               109,155,881
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,705,908
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,173,795
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,939,068
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             737,494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (871,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   144,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (727,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (727,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 4.8

(LOGO)

November 11, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:
    
    MeriStar Hospitality CorporationCommission File No. 1-11903


Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Item 601 (b) (4) (iii) of Regulation S-K
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, MeriStar Hospitality Corporation (the Company)
hereby agrees to furnish copies of certain long-term debt
instruments to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon the
request of the Commission, and, in accordance with such
regulation, such instruments are not being filed as part of
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2003.

Very truly yours,

MERISTAR HOSPITALITY CORPORATION

By:
    
    /s/ Jerome J. KraisingerJerome J. KraisingerExecutive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel






---

MeriStar Hospitality Corporation    4501 North Fairfax Drive    Suite 500    Arlington, VA 22203    703/812-7200    Fax 703/812-7255
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICT Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Vincent A. Paccapaniccia, Executive Vice President, Corporate Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                                    
|-------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------
|August 6, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    Vincent A. Paccapaniccia    
|               |  |  |  | Vincent A. Paccapaniccia           
|               |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate
|               |  |  |  | Finance and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Sunrise Energy Resources, Inc. a Delaware
      corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), Konstantin Tsiryulnikov, Principal Executive Officer of the
      Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Sunrise Energy Resources, Inc., and will be retained by Sunrise Energy
      Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.






Date:
                October 1, 2008By:
            /s/
                Konstantin TsiryulnikovKonstantin
                TsiryulnikovChief
                Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2435 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2435

To amend title 5, United States Code, to limit the number of local wage 
        areas allowable within a General Schedule pay locality.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 15, 2018

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to limit the number of local wage 
        areas allowable within a General Schedule pay locality.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Locality Pay Equity Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. LIMITING THE NUMBER OF LOCAL WAGE AREAS DEFINED WITHIN A 
              GENERAL SCHEDULE PAY LOCALITY.

    (a) Local Wage Area Limitation.--Section 5343(a) of title 5, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(B)(i), by striking ``(but such'' and 
        all that follows through ``are employed)'';
            (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (3) in paragraph (5), by striking the period after 
        ``Islands'' and inserting ``; and''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) the Office of Personnel Management shall define not 
        more than 1 local wage area within a pay locality, except that 
        this paragraph shall not apply to the pay locality designated 
        as `Rest of United States'.''.
    (b) General Schedule Pay Locality Defined.--Section 5342(a) of 
title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period after 
        ``employee'' and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) `pay locality' has the meaning given that term under 
        section 5302.''.

SEC. 3. REGULATIONS.

    The Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe 
any regulations necessary to carry out the purpose of this Act, 
including regulations to ensure that the enactment of this Act shall 
not have the effect of reducing any rate of basic pay payable to any 
individual who is serving as a prevailing rate employee (as defined 
under section 5342(a)(2) of title 5, United States Code).

SEC. 4. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply on and after the first 
day of the first full pay period beginning at least 180 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### The Honorab le William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District 1 

### Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. ___________ No. 95-2237

___________ Gerald L. Brumley, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Dept. of Labor, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 6, 1996 Filed: March 12, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. The Di strict Court, concluding that the Privacy Act's two-yea r 1 statute of limitations barred Brumley's action, granted summary judgment in favor of the Department of Labor. Brumley appeals. After carefu l review, we do not find any error of law to warrant reversal. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO OPTEK
CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 27,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STAEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          51,630
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,530
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,670
<INVENTORY>                                     79,457
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               257,360
<PP&E>                                          89,189
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,036
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 587,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          200,884
<BONDS>                                         98,073
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           485
<OTHER-SE>                                     267,152
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   587,302
<SALES>                                        341,408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               341,408
<CGS>                                          183,702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  183,702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,222
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   206
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 49,579
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,234
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,345
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,345
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
        


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.45
 THIS WARRANT AND THE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK ISSUABLE UPON EXERCISE OF THIS WARRANT HAVE
NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE ACT) OR ANY STATE
SECURITIES LAWS, AND ARE RESTRICTED SECURITIES AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN RULE 144 UNDER THE
ACT. THE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD, OFFERED FOR SALE, OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED UNLESS AND
UNTIL REGISTERED UNDER SAID ACT AND ANY APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS, OR UPON RECEIPT BY
THE COMPANY OF AN OPINION OF COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT
REQUIRED.
  WARRANT TO PURCHASE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
 ISSUE DATE: September 28, 2006
 
 Exercise of the Warrant.
 Exercise Exhibit I




---



##### 



Exercise Date and Status as Holder of Shares
 Issuance of Certificates
   Warrant Shares
 Vesting Date
 Adjustments.
 Adjustment for Stock Splits and Combinations
 Adjustment for Certain Dividends and Distributions
 - 2 -




---



##### 



provided however
 Adjustment in Number of Warrant Shares
 Adjustment for Reorganization
 No Adjustments in Certain Cases
 - 3 -




---



##### 



Treasury Stock.
 Fractional Shares
 Investment Representations
 Investment
 Accredited Investor
 Experience
 Transfers, etc.
    - 4 -




---



##### 



Exhibit II
 No Impairment; Adjustment of Par Value
   Record Date, etc.
   - 5 -




---



##### 



Reservation of Stock
 Exchange or Replacement of Warrants
   Notices.
 - 6 -




---



##### 



No Rights as Stockholder; No Liability
 Payment of Taxes provided however
 Amendment or Waiver
 Section Headings
 Severability
 Assignment
 Governing Law
 Signatures
  - 7 -




---



##### 



CYTOCORE, INC.By:
    /s/ David WeissbergDavid Weissberg, M.D.Title:
    Chief Executive Officer - 8 -




---



##### 



To:
    
    Dated:
 
 
 Signature:Address:
 - 9 -




---



##### 

\

Name of Assignee
    
    Address
    
    No. of Shares
 Dated:
    
    
    
    
    
    Signature:Signature Guaranteed:By:
  - 10 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            16,214
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     29,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,009,979
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,203,390
<PP&E>                                           328,720
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (105,565)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,253,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,081,118
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          29,717
<OTHER-SE>                                      (797,649)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,081,118
<SALES>                                          147,803
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 147,803
<CGS>                                            128,474
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,669,864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               201,393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (2,851,928)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2,851,928)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,851,928)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.78)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 15.1


Awareness Letter of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





Electronic Arts Inc.


Redwood City, California:


With respect to the subject registration statements on Form S‐8 (Nos. 333‐183077, 333‐176181, 333‐168680, 333‐161229, 333‐152757, 333‐148596, 333‐145182, 333‐138532, 333‐131933, 333‐127156, 333‐117990, 333‐107710, 333‐99525, 333‐67430, 333‐44222, 333‐39432, and 333-190355) and the registration statement on Form S‐3 (No. 333‐199995) of Electronic Arts Inc., we acknowledge our awareness of the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated February 8, 2016 related to our review of interim financial information included in Form 10‐Q for the quarterly period ended January 2, 2016.


Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.





/s/ KPMG LLP


Santa Clara, California


February 8, 2016
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juana Peralta, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pitaro, J.), rendered June 5, 1989, convicting her of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s contention that the People committed a *Brady*violation *(see, Brady v Maryland,*373 US 83, 87-88) when they delayed in turning over to the defense a purportedly exculpatory statement made by a nontestifying witness which was written on the back of a police report, has not been preserved for appellate review since no objection on this basis was made before the trial court *(see, People v McKay,*162 AD2d 146).

Moreover, the defendant’s contention that the court erred when it refused to charge the jury with respect to assault in the third degree as a lesser included offense of assault in the second degree is without merit. There is no reasonable view of the evidence presented at trial which would permit the jury to conclude that the defendant committed the lesser but not the greater offense *(see, People v Green,*56 NY2d 427, 429-430). The evidence showed that the defendant either intended to cause or did, in fact, cause physical injury to the complainant with the use of a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument, namely, a knife *(see,*Penal Law § 120.05 [2] [assault in the second degree]).

*467The sentence imposed on the defendant was neither harsh nor excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. In any event, any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, People v Whaley,*144 AD2d 510; *People v Griffin,*126 AD2d 743, 744; *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230). Balletta, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.