alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16- 1480 V

Filed: April 19, 2017 Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ERIN MCLANE , *

* Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement (Non

- Table) ; * Concession; Tetanus

- diphtheria v. * acellular pertussis ( “ Tdap ” ) Vaccine;

* Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Administration ( “ SIRVA ” ); Special AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Processing Unit ( “ SPU ”)

* Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher PA , f or petitioner.

Ann D. Martin , U .S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On November 9, 2016

, Erin McLane (“p etitioner ”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”)

. Peti tioner alleges that she suffered left shoulder injuries as a result of a tetanus

- diphtheria -acel lular pertussis (“ Tdap ” ) vaccine that she received on February 3, 2016. Pet

. at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 19, 2017

, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) R eport c onceding that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Rule 4(c) Rep

. at 1 . Specifically, respondent

stated that “ petitioner ’ s left shoulder injury is consistent with SIRVA [shoulder injury

rel ated to vaccine administration], and that it was caused in fact by the Tdap vaccine

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance wi th

the E

- Government Act of 2002

. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)(Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the ident ified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 she received on February 3, 2016. ” Id. at 3. Respondent “ did not identify any other causes for petitio ner ’ s SIRVA, and records show that she suffered the sequela of her injury for more than six months. ” Id. T hus, based on the evidence submitted in this case, “ petitioner has met the statutory requirements for entitlement to compensation. ”

Id.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence of record

, the undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, John M. Palumbo, certify that: 

 

1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 10, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0680 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. REX WILLIAM ALLEN,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 26 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 13 2023

11/13/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0680
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 08-2587 THOMAS SUTLIFFE; DONALD SISSON; LEO GRIMARD; NANCY LEE GRIMARD; RENEE VICTORIA; EPPING RESIDENTS FOR PRINCIPLED GOVERNMENT, INC., Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v . EPPING SCHOOL DISTRICT; TOWN OF EPPING; BARBARA D. MUNSEY, Superintendent of Schools, Administrative Unit #14; HAROLD K. LAPIERRE, Moderator, Town of Epping School District; SUSAN MCGEOUGH, Member, Town of Epping Board of Selectmen; THOMAS GAUTHIER, Member, Town of Epping Board of Selectmen; CHRISTOPHER MURPHY, Member, Town of Epping Board of Selectmen; KIM SULLIVAN, Member, Town of Epping Board of Selectmen; MARCI MORRIS, Chair, Epping School Board; JEFFREY NOLLETT, Member, Epping School Board; SUSAN KIMBALL, Member and Chair, Epping School Board; PAMELA TIBBETTS, Member and Chair, Epping School Board; SCOTT BOOTH, Member, Epping School Board; ROBERT LONEK, Member, Epping School Board; JEFFREY LEDUC, Member, Epping School Board; MARK A.

VALLONE, Principal, Epping Elementary School,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on September 17, 2009, is amended as follows: On page 22, line 21, the case name "Pagán v. Claderón" should be replaced with "Pagán v. Calderón" On page 33, footnote 8, line 5, the comma after "Broad." should be deleted.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40266

Summary Calendar

DAVID LAUER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; BARRY TELFORD UNIT;

UNKNOWN STEPHENS, Warden; UNKNOWN HUDSON, Warden; UNKNOWN

RODEEN, Warden; UNKNOWN ODEM, Cpt; UNKNOWN MILES, Lieutenant;

UNKNOWN WISNER, Lieutenant; TIA RANGE, Lieutenant; UNKNOWN

COLEMAN, Sgt; UNKNOWN DELEVAN, mail personnel; UNKNOWN

SHARP, mail personnel; UNKNOWN YBARRA, mail personnel;

UNKNOWN RAYBURN, mail personnel; UNKNOWN CURRIE, mail room,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(No. 5:02-CV-243)

--------------------

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant David Lauer, Texas prisoner # 1069082,

filed an interlocutory appeal of the district court’s denial of his

motions for a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction,

and protective order. After Lauer filed his interlocutory appeal,

the district court dismissed his complaint with prejudice. Lauer
2

argues in this appeal that the district court erred when it denied

injunctive relief.

We lack jurisdiction over the denial of an application for a

temporary restraining order. See Faulder v. Johnson, 178 F.3d 741,

742 (5th Cir. 1999). As Lauer fails to argue that the district

court erred when it denied his motion for a protective order, he

has abandoned this issue. See Hughes v. Johnson, 191 F.3d 607,

613-14 (5th Cir. 1999). Thus, the only issue in this appeal is

whether the district court erred when it denied Lauer’s motion for

a preliminary injunction.

Lauer fails to explain why his interlocutory appeal of the

denial of injunctive relief has merit, even though the district

court has now dismissed his lawsuit. He thus has not established

a substantial likelihood of success on the merits. See Speaks v.

Kruse, 445 F.3d 396, 399-400 (5th Cir. 2006). It is unnecessary

for us to consider the remaining prerequisites for injunctive

relief. See Walgreen Co. v. Hood, 275 F.3d 475, 478 (5th Cir.

2001).

The judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 99.3

MERISTAR HOSPITALITY CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of MeriStar Hospitality Corporation, (the Registrant) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, James A. Calder, Chief Accounting Officer of
MeriStar Hospitality Corporation, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:



| | 1) |  | The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and                            
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2) |  | The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

/s/ James A. Calder
James A. Calder
Chief Accounting Officer
November 13, 2002
By Notice dated October 1, 1999, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 13, 1999, (64 FR 55489), Chattem Chemicals, Inc., 3801 St. Elmo Avenue, Building 18, Chatanooga, Tennessee 37409, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of methamphetamine (1105), a basic class of controlled substance listed Schedule II.                

The firm plans to bulk manufacture methamphetamine to produce products for distribution to its customers.

DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Chattem Chemicals, Inc. to manufacture methamphetamine is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated the firm on a regular basis to ensure that the company's continued registration is consistent with the public interest. These investigations have included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR § 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed above is granted.

Dated: January 24, 2000.

John H. King, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-3143  Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

______________________________________________________________________________

MIRIAM PENADO

 Petitioner and Appellant,

On behalf of Herself and A.A.H., born 2018 and 

A.M.H., born 2020,

v.

DANIEL HUNTER,

Respondent and Appellee.

Cause No. DA-23-0692

ORDER EXTENDING DUE DATE FOR 

OPENING BRIEF 

UPON READING the unopposed Motion for an extension of the due date for the 

Opening Brief and finding good cause appearing therein.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opening brief in the above-listed case is GRANTED 

an additional thirty (30) days to file and must be filed by January 29, 2024.

Dated this _____ day of __________________________.

________________________

Judge / Clerk 

of the Supreme Court

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 28 2023

12/28/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0692
SERVED: DECEMBER 30, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS -. 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MESA AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0846 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND DISMISSAL OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011SW070030) was received by the 

Office of Hearings on December 20, 2013, and has been assigned to the undersigned. On 

December 20, 2013, Complainant's Counsel served a Withdrawal of Complaint, stating that the 

parties had reached a settlement and withdrawing its complaint. Accordingly, pursuant to 14 

C.F.R. § 13.215, this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

The FAA shall send the Judge and the FAA Hearing Docket a copy of any compromise 

order or fmal order assessing civil penalty. 

SO ORDERED. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Annjenet Chennault, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW -7E4, AC 

Federal Aviation Administration I . 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

TEL: 817-222-5071 

FAX: 817-222-5092/5946 

Brian S. Gillman, Respondent's Counsel 

Exec. VP & General Counsel, Mesa Air Group 

410 N. 44th Street, Suite 700 

Phoenix, AZ 85008 

TEL: 602-685-4000 

FAC{: 602-685-4350 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0846 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
**UNITED STATES**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington, DC 20549**

 

**FORM 8-K**

 

CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

**DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported): May 26, 2009**

 

**FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION**

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

| INDIANA                                        | 0-17071                  | 35-544218                         |
|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (Commission File number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

 

**200 East Jackson Street**

**P.O. Box 792**

**Muncie, IN 47305-2814**

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

 

**(765) 747-1500**

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

**Not Applicable**

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

 

Check  the  appropriate  box  below  if the  Form  8-K  filing  is  intended  to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

 

**o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)**

**o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)**

**o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))**

**o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))**

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION  ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.  IN  ACCORDANCE  WITH  STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL  ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS NO. 128,  "EARNINGS  PER SHARE," BASIC  EARNINGS PER SHARE AND DILUTED
EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE FINANCIAL  DATA SCHEDULE  PRESENTED
BELOW IN PLACE OF PRIMARY  EARNINGS  PER SHARE AND FULLY  DILUTED  EARNINGS  PER
SHARE.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1999
        
<CASH>                                                1,692
<SECURITIES>                                            729
<RECEIVABLES>                                         2,462
<ALLOWANCES>                                             99
<INVENTORY>                                           1,828
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      6,747
<PP&E>                                                1,347
<DEPRECIATION>                                          589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        8,596
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 1,852
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                 10
<OTHER-SE>                                           21,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          8,590
<SALES>                                               2,534
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      2,534
<CGS>                                                 1,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         2,113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (744)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (744)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (744)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.08)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          86,626
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          192,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (101,746)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,254
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,077
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (245,887)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,646)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,337
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (237,119)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (237,119)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (237,119)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (18.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (18.42)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT (24)(C)


February 22, 2002



Mr. Michael D. VanHemert
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company
5444 Westheimer Court
Houston, Texas  77056-5310



Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company is required to file an Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 with the Securities and Exchange
Commission within 90 days after the end of the year.

We hereby make, constitute and appoint you our true and lawful attorney for each
of us and in each of our names, places and steads to sign and cause to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission said Annual Report with any
necessary exhibits, and any amendments thereto that may be required.




 /s/ William T. McCormick, Jr.
 --------------------------------
William T. McCormick, Jr.




 /s/ William J. Haener
 ---------------------------------
William J. Haener




 /s/ Preston D. Hopper
----------------------------------
Preston D. Hopper