alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Damon HUNTER v. STATE.

No. 19961.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1938.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 25, 1939.

Wm. McMurrey, of Cold Springs, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft of hogs; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

No statement of facts is brought forward.

Appellant is a negro. The two bills of exception found in the record relate to the appellant’s effort to have the indictment set aside on the alleged ground that the negro race had been discriminated against in the selection of the grand jury which returned the indictment. The court heard the testimony of three witnesses, which was in all things identical with the testimony of the same witnesses as shown in the case of Walter Ryan v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 123 S.W.2d 659, this day delivered. In that case we reached the conclusion that the evidence failed to show that the omission to draw any negroes upon the grand jury which indicted Ryan was the result of purposeful discrimination against the negroes because of their race or color. Giving effect to such holding, we are constrained to overrule appellant’s contention.

The judgment is affirmed.

*662PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant, in his motion for a rehearing, insists that we erred in our original opinion in holding that the trial court did not err in overruling his motion to quash the indictment on the grounds that the negro race was discriminated against.

We have again carefully reviewed the record in the light of appellant’s motion and remain of the opinion that the case was properly decided on original submission. See also Mitchell v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 491, 105 S.W.2d 246.

The motion for a rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance





Exhibit 10.4




NEW CASTLE FINANCIAL SERVICES




August 12, 2008




ChromaDex Corporation/ChromaDex, Inc.

10005 Muirlands Boulevard

Suite G, First Floor

Irvine, CA 92618

Attn:  Tom Varvaro




	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Re:
	 	Placement Agency Agreement dated November 19, 2007 (the “Agreement”), by
and between ChromaDex, Inc. (and together with its parents, ChromaDex Corporation,
“ChromaDex”), and New Castle Financial Services LLC (“New Castle”)






Dear Mr. Varvaro:



Pursuant to Section 6 of the Agreement, ChromaDex and New Castle, upon the expiration of the
initial 6 month term of the Agreement, may terminate the Agreement by providing 30 days prior
written notice. This letter serves to confirm New Castle’s intent to terminate the Placement
Agency Agreement as of the date of this letter, and forgo its right to 30 days’ prior written
notice. New Castle’s termination does not affect any of its obligations which, pursuant to said
Agreement, are intended to survive the termination.



Kindly countersign below to indicate your assent to the foregoing and our mutual agreement to
terminate the Agreement effective as of the date of this letter.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,
 
New Castle Financial Services LLC

 	 
	 	                                                  /s/ Anthony Lodati
 	 
	 	Anthony Lodati, its President 	 
	 	 	 
	 



Agreed & Consented to

this 12th day of August 2008 by:

ChromaDex Corporation/ChromaDex, Inc.




	 	 	 
	/s/ Tom Varvaro

	 	 
	 	 	 
	Tom Varvaro, its Chief Financial Officer
EX-10.2






Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC.

UNFUNDED BENEFIT PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective as of December 1, 2007)




          NACCO Industries, Inc. hereby adopts this Amendment No. 1 to the NACCO Industries, Inc.
Unfunded Benefit Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective as of December 1, 2007) (the “Plan”), to
be effective as of January 1, 2008. Words used herein with initial capital letters which are
defined in the Plan are used herein as so defined.




Section 1




          Article VII of the Plan is hereby amended by adding a new Section 7.03 to the end thereof, to
read as follows:




     “SECTION 7.03. Additional Payments.




     (a) At the time described in clause (b) of this Section 7.03, the Company shall pay to the
Participant who is a Covered Employee (i) an amount equal to the positive difference, if any, of
I minus II (the “Income Tax Payment”), plus (ii) an additional amount such that, after payment
by the Participant of all applicable federal, state and local income taxes and employment (e.g.,
FICA) taxes on the Income Tax Payment, the Participant will retain an amount equal to the Income
Tax Payment (the “Gross-Up Payment”). For purposes of this Section 7.03:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	I
	 	=
	 	The Participant’s federal, state and local income tax and
employment (e.g., FICA) tax liability with respect to the payment of the amount
described in Section 7.01(c)(i)(i) (the “Frozen Account Balance”); and
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	II
	 	=
	 	The amount of federal, state and local income tax
employment (e.g., FICA) tax liability the Participant would have incurred with
respect to the payment of the Participant’s Frozen Account Balance if the
Frozen Account Balance had been paid to the Participant during the 2008 Plan
Year.






For purposes of calculating the amounts described in I and II above and determining the
Gross-Up Payment, the Covered Employee will be considered to pay (X) federal income taxes at the
highest rate in effect in the applicable year and (Y) state and local income taxes at the highest
rate in effect in the state or locality in which the applicable payment would be subject to state
or local tax, net of the maximum reduction in federal income tax that could be obtained from
deduction of such state and local taxes. All determinations required to be made under this Section
7.03 shall be made by the Company in consultation with the Participant.





1









 




     (b) The payment described in paragraph (a) of this Section 7.03 shall be made at the same time
as the payment described in Section 7.01(c)(i) or 7.01(c)(ii), whichever is applicable.”




EXECUTED this 11th day of November, 2008.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
Charles A. Bittenbender	 
	 	Title: 	Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary	 
	 	 	 	 
	 




2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6180

RONALD P. TORRIES, JR., Petitioner - Appellant,

versus E. RICHARD BAZZLE, Warden; HENRY D. MCMASTER, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-04-791) Submitted: June 30, 2005 Decided: July 27, 2005 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald P. Torries, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, John William McIntosh, Assistant Attorney General, Samuel Creighton Waters, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Ronald P. Torries, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) in which he claimed he received ineffective assistance of counsel. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Torries has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 73687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20510]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4798-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Texas; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas (FEMA-4798-DR), dated July 9, 2024, and related 
determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued August 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas is hereby amended to include permanent work 
under the Public Assistance program for the following areas among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared 
a major disaster by the President in his declaration of July 9, 2024.

    Austin, Brazoria, Harris, Jasper, Liberty, Matagorda, 
Montgomery, San Jacinto, and Wharton Counties for permanent work 
[Categories C-G] (already designated for Individual Assistance and 
assistance for debris removal and emergency protective measures 
[Categories A and B], including direct Federal assistance, under the 
Public Assistance program).
    Colorado County for permanent work [Categories C-G] (already 
designated for debris removal and emergency protective measures 
[Categories A and B], including direct Federal assistance, under the 
Public Assistance program).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-20510 Filed 9-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 169 (Thursday, August 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 52784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21423]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8000]

U.S. Department of State Advisory Committee on Private 
International Law: Notice of Annual Meeting

    The Department of State's Advisory Committee on Private 
International Law (ACPIL) will hold its annual meeting on developments 
in private international law on Thursday, October 11 and Friday, 
October 12, 2012 in Washington, DC. The meeting will be held at the 
Michael K. Young Faculty Conference Center, George Washington 
University Law School, 2000 H Street NW., Washington, DC 20052. The 
program is scheduled to run from 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Thursday and 
from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. on Friday.
    Time permitting, we expect that the discussion will focus on 
developments in a number of areas, e.g., international family law; 
federalism issues in implementing the Hague Convention on Choice of 
Court Agreements; international contract law; developments in major PIL 
organizations; agricultural finance and food security; and simplified 
incorporation and other initiatives to promote the growth of 
microenterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises. We also expect 
to discuss possible future work in the PIL field and solicit 
suggestions in that regard.
    Documents on these subjects are available at www.hcch.net; 
www.uncitral.org; www.unidroit.org; www.oas.org, and www.nccusl.org. We 
may, by email, supplement those with additional documents.
    Please advise as early as possible if you plan to attend. The 
meeting is open to the public up to the capacity of the conference 
facility, and space will be reserved on a first come, first served 
basis. Persons who wish to have their views considered are encouraged, 
but not required, to submit written comments in advance. Those who are 
unable to attend are also encouraged to submit written views. Comments 
should be sent electronically to smeltzertk@state.gov. Those planning 
to attend should provide name, affiliation and contact information to 
Tricia Smeltzer at 202-776-8423 and Niesha Toms at 202-776-8420, or by 
email to tomsnn@state.gov and smeltzertk@state.gov. A member of the 
public needing reasonable accommodation should advise those same 
contacts not later than September 28th. Requests made after that date 
will be considered, but might not be able to be fulfilled.

    Dated: August 22, 2012.
Keith Loken,
Assistant Legal Adviser, Office of Private International Law, Office of 
the Legal Adviser, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-21423 Filed 8-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
```
# Úradný vestník C 273/2015

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 273 |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Zväzok 5818. augusta 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 273

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Zväzok 5818. augusta 2015

---

| Číslo oznamu | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Korigendá |
| 2015/C 273/01 | Korigendum k pozícii Rady (EÚ) č. 10/2015 v prvom čítaní na účely prijatia nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady, ktorým sa mení nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 515/97 o vzájomnej pomoci medzi správnymi orgánmi členských štátov a o spolupráci medzi správnymi orgánmi členských štátov a Komisiou pri zabezpečovaní riadneho uplatňovania predpisov o colných a poľnohospodárskych záležitostiach – Prijatá Radou 15. júna 2015( Ú. v. EÚ C 239, 21.7.2015 ) | 1 |

Číslo oznamu

Obsah

Strana

Korigendá

2015/C 273/01

Korigendum k pozícii Rady (EÚ) č. 10/2015 v prvom čítaní na účely prijatia nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady, ktorým sa mení nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 515/97 o vzájomnej pomoci medzi správnymi orgánmi členských štátov a o spolupráci medzi správnymi orgánmi členských štátov a Komisiou pri zabezpečovaní riadneho uplatňovania predpisov o colných a poľnohospodárskych záležitostiach – Prijatá Radou 15. júna 2015( Ú. v. EÚ C 239, 21.7.2015 )

( Ú. v. EÚ C 239, 21.7.2015 )

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

Korigendá

| 18.8.2015 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | C 273/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2015

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

C 273/1

---

Korigendum k pozícii Rady (EÚ) č. 10/2015 v prvom čítaní na účely prijatia nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady, ktorým sa mení nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 515/97 o vzájomnej pomoci medzi správnymi orgánmi členských štátov a o spolupráci medzi správnymi orgánmi členských štátov a Komisiou pri zabezpečovaní riadneho uplatňovania predpisov o colných a poľnohospodárskych záležitostiach – Prijatá Radou 15. júna 2015

(
  Úradný vestník Európskej únie C 239 z 21. júla 2015
  )

(2015/C 273/01)

Na strane 10 v článku 1 sa v bode 15 dopĺňa toto písmeno:

| „c) | odsek 3 sa vypúšťa;“. |
| --- | --- |

„c)

odsek 3 sa vypúšťa;“.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          51,175
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,568
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     14,879
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,247
<PP&E>                                         531,834
<DEPRECIATION>                                 232,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 462,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,569
<BONDS>                                        105,510
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           153
<OTHER-SE>                                     264,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   462,226
<SALES>                                        190,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               190,031
<CGS>                                          135,897
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,897
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,691
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,535
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,881
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,862
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,862
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Melissa M. and Another, Children Alleged to be Neglected.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decisions at Monroe County Family Court, Sciolino, J. (Appeal from order of Monroe County Family Court, Sciolino, J.—permanent neglect.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended July 1, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                       |  | 
|Dated: August 10, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ JOHN M. PALUMBO    
|                       |  |  |  | John M. Palumbo        
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6698

QUINTON L. BRISBANE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BEAUFORT COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; C. L. WILSON, Corporal; J. PURDY, Sergeant; S. RODRIGUEZ, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (4:04-cv-00401-HMH) Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: May 11, 2007 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Quinton L. Brisbane, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Hodges Waldron, Jr.; Katy Anne Rice, CAROLINA LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, LLC, Bluffton, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Quinton L. Brisbane seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Brisbane that failure to file timely and specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Brisbane’s objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation were non-specific. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Brisbane has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court as modified to reflect that the dismissal of Brisbane’s pendent state law claims should be dismissed without prejudice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
Exhibit
23
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We consent to the incorporation by reference
in Registration Statements No. 333-149360 on Form S-3, 333-144498 on Form S-3D,
and 333-16253, 333-117930, 333-77149, 333-73054, and 333-129422 on Form S-8 of
PG&E Corporation and Registration Statements No. 33-62488 and 333-149361 on
Form S-3 of Pacific Gas and Electric Company of our reports dated
February 19, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and
consolidated financial statement schedules of PG&E Corporation and
subsidiaries (the “Company”) and Pacific Gas and Electric Company and
subsidiaries (the “Utility”) and the effectiveness of the Company’s and the
Utility’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
  
   DELOITTE
& TOUCHE LLP
  February 19,
2010
 San
Francisco, California