alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating Partners 1994-D, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         476,722
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  263,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               746,024
<PP&E>                                         4,572,096
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,328,520)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,944,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          81,876
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,852,058
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,944,600
<SALES>                                        277,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               284,703
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  866,942<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (611,757)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (611,757)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (611,757)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001013149
<NAME> ICT GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                       1
<CASH>                                          14,199                  16,787
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,083                  15,557
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,251                  34,580
<PP&E>                                          45,781                  30,253
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,298                  12,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,751                  57,042
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,529                   8,461
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           116                     115
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,772                  42,476
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,751                  57,042
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,582                  65,072
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,004                  35,861
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,954                  26,682
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 204                   (344)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,420                   2,873
<INCOME-TAX>                                       943                   1,123
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,477                   1,750
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,477                   1,750
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13                     .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12                     .15
        


</TABLE>
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20

- 0051 V

UNPUBLISHED

JANE T JA CKSON

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: October 4, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;
Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA , for P etitioner.

Ida Nassar , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On January 15, 2020

, J anet Jackson filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injur y related to vac cine administration ( “ SIR VA ” ) from the administration of an influen za ( “ flu ” ) vaccination on February 6, 2018 . Petition at ¶ 1

. T he case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On September 30, 2021

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that P etitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, R espondent ’ s position is “ that petitioner has satisfied the criteria

set forth in the Vaccine I njury Table ( “ Table ” ) and the Qualifications and Aids to

1 Because this unpublished R uling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required
to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the R uling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material f its within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012 ).2 Interpretation ( “ Q AI ” ). That is, petitioner had no relevant history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction in her right shoulder; he r pain and reduced range of motion occurred within 48 hours of receipt of an in tramuscular vaccination; her s ymptoms were limited to the

shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality was identified to explain her symptoms

. Id. at 5

.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
#### Ex Parte McGRUDER.

No. 20260.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 21, 1938.

E. P. Lipscomb, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Hon. S. G. Tayloe, Judge of the District Court of the 45th Judicial District of Texas, remanding the appellant to- the custody of the Sheriff of Bexar County.

It appears from this record that appellant was convicted in the Justice Court of Precinct No. 1 of said county on a complaint charging him with being a vagrant, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $200 which he failed to pay.

Thereupon the Justice- of the Peace in and for said Precinct issued a capias pro fine, under and by virtue of which he was taken into custody by the Sheriff and confined in the County jail. Appellant then applied to the Hon. S. G. Tayloe for a writ of habeas corpus, and upon a hearing thereof the court remanded him, as aforesaid.

Appellant does not attempt to attack the validity of the law under which he was prosecuted and convicted, but asserts that the evidence did not justify his conviction. He cannot substitute for an appeal the proceedings provided by writ of habeas corpus. He had an adequate legal remedy by appeal to the county court, and if the evidence produced was such as not to warrant his cpnviction of the offense charged, the presumption obtains that the county court would have respected the law and given him the proper relief. It is well settled that a writ of habeas corpus can never serve the office of an appeal. See Ex parte Lovel, 101 Tex.Cr.R. 576, 276 S.W. 428; Ex parte Drenner, 125 Tex.Cr.R. 331, 67 S.W.2d 870.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,882
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             531
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     50,207
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         68,550
<ALLOWANCE>                                        966
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,608
<DEPOSITS>                                     113,306
<SHORT-TERM>                                       161
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                857
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,759
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 129,608
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,527
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  846
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    17
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,390
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,024
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  20
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,346
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    891
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    594
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         453
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       453
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.50
<LOANS-NON>                                        578
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   957
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        3
<RECOVERIES>                                        12
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  966
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               647
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            319


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              13
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,616
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,379
<PP&E>                                           7,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,766
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        328
<COMMON>                                           104
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,812)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,363
<SALES>                                         39,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,924
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,525
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 678
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,128
<INCOME-TAX>                                       113
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,016
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,016
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, James A. McGrady, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year endedJanuary 29, 2005 of Retail Ventures, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
 

 
        Dated: April 11, 2006
Phantom 3 Pre-Flight Safety Check

Physical: Electrical:

Start-Up: Flight Check:

Drone Main Body Check

Drone Landing Gear Check

Drone Gimbal Lock & Camera Cover in Place

Drone Propeller Check

Controller Main Body Check

Controller Antenna Check

Controller Device Mount Check

Monitoring Device Exterior Body Check

Drone Battery Level Check

Controller Battery Level Check

Monitoring Device Battery Level Check

Forward Flight

Rearward Flight

Left Turn

Right Turn

Move Left

Move Right

Gimbal Up

Gimbal Down

Turn Controller On

Connect Controller to Monitoring Device

Open Drone App on Monitoring Device Running 

Insert Battery into Drone

Turn Drone Battery On

Verify Drone-Controller-Monitoring Device Connection

Verify GPS Signal

Calibrate Drone to Specific Location

Spool Drone Motors (No Blades)

Verify Proper Motor Idle

Shutdown Motors

Attach Blades to Motors

Remove Gimbal Lock and Camera Cover

Verify Drone-Controller-Monitoring Device Connection

Verify GPS Signal

Launch to 4ft Hover

Start 18min Flight Timer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00144-CR

Anthony Lee SMITH,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR10000

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 19, 2017.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
SERVED JAN 1 9 1990 

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

ROCKY MOUNTAIN AIRWAYS, INC. 

FAA DOCKET CP89NM0483 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORDER OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

This proceeding arises from an Order of Civil Penalty dated 

December 5, 1989, alleging violations of the Federal Aviation Act 

and Respondent's request for hearing dated November 28, 1989. 

The undersigned administrative law judge was assigned to the 

proceeding by Notice served January 17, 1990. 

The Rules of Practice for this proceeding are set forth in 

Part 13, Subpart G, of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

(14 C.F.R. Part 13, 53 Fed. Reg. 34653, September 7, 1988). 

Those rules provide, inter alia, that the Respondent must file a 

written answer within 30 days after service of the order of civil 

penalty (S 13.209(a)), that a general denial is deemed a failure 

to file an answer (S 13 . 209(d)), that failure to file an answer 

without good cause is deemed an admission of each allegation in 

the order of civil penalty and an order assessing civil penalty 

shall be issued (§ 13.209(f)), and that, absent agreement of the 

parties, a party seeking an extension of time must file a written 

motion not less than seven days before the document is due, 
- 2 -

absent good cause shown (S 13.213(a) and (b)). 

In order to expedite the hearing in this matter, the 

Regional Counsel and Respondent on or before February 2, 1990, 

shall file an agreed or separate proposed procedural schedules 

including proposed dates for (i.e., specific dates not merely 

numbers of days prior to the hearing) filing stipulations, a list 

of witnesses, a summary of their proposed testimony, and for 

exchange of exhibits and discovery, if any; a statement 

concerning the status of settlement efforts; a proposed hearing 

site; and, absent agreement between the parties, a justification 

of any such proposed site. Attached is a copy of the Judge's 

Order dated May 30, 1989, in Linda Joyce Goodman , FAA Docket 

CP89WP0061, concerning the responsibility of the agency attorney 

to consider settlement and compromise of these proceedings under 

FAA Order 2150.3A and the Rules governing these proceedings. 

Each party's filing shall include a telephone number where they 

can be reached by the Judge for prehearing telephone conferences. 

Dated: January 19, 1990 

Attachment