74884 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 178 / Friday, September 13, 2024 / Notices 

17See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

18 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied 

the assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

19For calculated (estimated) ad valorem 

importer-specific assessment rates used in 

determining whether the per-unit assessment rate is 

de minimis, see Memorandum, ‘‘Preliminary 

Results Margin Calculation for Shanghai Yueda 

Nails Co., Ltd.,’’ dated concurrently with this 

notice, and accompanying Margin Calculation 

Program Logs and Outputs. 

20See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

21See NME Practice for a full discussion. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, 

Commerce will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review.17 Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 35 days 

after the publication date of the final 

results of this review in the Federal 

Register. If a timely summons is filed at 

the U.S. Court of International Trade, 

the assessment instructions will direct 

CBP not to liquidate relevant entries 

until the time for parties to file a request 

for a statutory injunction has expired 

(i.e., within 90 days of publication). 

If Shanghai Yueda’s ad valorem 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 

0.50 percent) in the final results of this 

review, Commerce will calculate 

importer-specific assessment rates on 

the basis of the ratio of the total amount 

of dumping calculated for the importer’s 

examined sales and the total quantity of 

those sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).18 Commerce will also 

calculate estimated ad valorem 

importer-specific assessment rates with 

which to assess whether the per-unit 

assessment rate is de minimis.19 We will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review when the importerspecific ad valorem assessment rate 

calculated in the final results of this 

review is not zero or de minimis. Where 

Shanghai Yueda’s ad valorem weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis, or an importer-specific ad 

valorem assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis,20 we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For entries that were not reported in the 

U.S. sales data submitted by Shanghai 

Yueda, Commerce will instruct CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the rate for the 

China-wide entity.21

For the final results, if we continue to 

treat S-Mart as part of the China-wide 

entity, we will instruct CBP to apply an 

ad valorem assessment rate of 118.04 

percent to all entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR which was 

exported by that company. 

For the companies for which we 

intend to rescind the review in the final 

results based on no reviewable entries, 

provided we receive no contrary 

information, we intend to instruct CBP 

to assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries at a rate equal to the 

cash deposit rate of estimated 

antidumping duties required at the time 

of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, 

for consumption in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends 

to issue assessment instructions to CBP 

for these companies no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results in the Federal Register. 

In accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final results 

of this review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of this review and for future 

deposits of estimated antidumping 

duties, as applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for Shanghai 

Yueda, the cash deposit rate will be 

equal to the weighted-average dumping 

margin established in the final results of 

this review (except that if the ad 

valorem rate is de minimis, then the 

cash deposit rate will be zero); (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not 

listed above that have separate rates, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing exporter-specific cash deposit 

rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of 

subject merchandise that have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate for 

the China-wide entity; and (4) for all 

non-Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own separate rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

Chinese exporter that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This administrative review and notice 

are issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act, 19 CFR 351.213, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: September 6, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Intent to Rescind Review, In Part 

V. Discussion of the Methodology 

VI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Non-Selected Companies Under Review 

1. Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd. 

2. Nanjing Caiqing Hardware Co., Ltd. 

3. Nanjing Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd. 

4. Shandong Qingyun Hongyi Hardware 

Products Co., Ltd. 

5. Shanxi Hairui Trade Co., Ltd. 

6. Suntec Industries Co., Ltd. 

7. Tianjin Jinchi Metal Products Co., Ltd. 

8. Xi’an Metals & Minerals Import & Export 

Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2024–20760 Filed 9–12–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–871] 

Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From 

India: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, and Rescission, in Part; 2022– 

2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

finds that producers and/or exporters 

subject to this administrative review 

made sales of subject merchandise at 

less than normal value (NV) during the 

period of review (POR) August 1, 2022, 

through July 31, 2023. We are also 

rescinding the review with respect to 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 178 / Friday, September 13, 2024 / Notices 74885 

1See Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India 

and Italy: Antidumping Duty Orders, 82 FR 40136 

(August 24, 2017) (Order). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review and Join Annual 

Inquiry Service List, 88 FR 50840 (August 2, 2023). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

71829 (October 18, 2023). 

4 In prior segments of this proceeding, we 

determined that Norma (India) Limited, USK 

Exports Private Limited, Uma Shanker Khandelwal 

& Co., and Bansidhar Chiranjilal were affiliated and 

should be treated as a single entity (Norma Group). 

See, e.g., Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India: 

Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value and Postponement of Final 

Determination, 82 FR 9719 (February 8, 2017), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, 

at 4–5, unchanged in Finished Carbon Steel Flanges 

from India: Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value, 82 FR 29483 (June 29, 2017). In 

this review, Norma (India) Limited and its affiliated 

entities have affirmed that the factual basis on 

which Commerce made its prior determinations has 

not changed. See Norma Group’s Letter, ‘‘2nd 

Supplemental Response Section A, C and D of AntiDumping duty Original Questionnaire,’’ dated June 

26, 2024, at S2–3. Therefore, Commerce continues 

to treat these four companies as a single entity. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ 

dated December 11, 2023 (Respondent Selection 

Memorandum). The Respondent Selection 

Memorandum incorrectly identified the number of 

companies on which we initiated as 41; we initiated 

the review on 42 companies after collapsing the 

four Norma Group companies as described above. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated April 10, 2024. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Finished 

Carbon Steel Flanges from India; 2022–2023,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

9See, e.g., Large Diameter Welded Pipe from 

Greece: Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2022–2023, 89 FR 4274 

(January 23, 2024). 

10See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2). 

11See 19 CFR 351.212(d)(3). 

12See Appendix III (listing the 27 companies). 13See Memorandum, ‘‘Intent to Rescind 

Administrative Review, in Part,’’ dated December 

15, 2023. 14See Appendix III. 

certain companies. Interested parties are 

invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable September 13, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Baker or Theodora Mattei, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–2924 or (202) 482–4834, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 24, 2017, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

antidumping duty order on finished 

carbon steel flanges from India.1 On 

August 2, 2023, Commerce published a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the Order.2 On 

October 18, 2023, Commerce initiated 

an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on finished 

carbon steel flanges from India, in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act).3 On December 11, 2023, 

Commerce selected Norma Group 4 and 

R. N. Gupta & Co., Ltd. (RNG) as 

mandatory respondents in this 

administrative review.5 On April 10, 

2024, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(2), Commerce extended the 

time period for issuing these 

preliminary results until no later than 

August 30, 2024.6 On July 22, 2024, 

Commerce tolled certain deadlines in 

this administrative proceeding by seven 

days.7 The deadline for these 

preliminary results is now September 6, 

2024. 

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.8 A list of topics 

included in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as Appendix 

I to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://access.

trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is finished carbon steel flanges. 

For a complete description of the scope 

of the Order, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Rescission, in Part, of Administrative 

Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review when there are no 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR for which liquidation is 

suspended.9 Normally, upon 

completion of an administrative review, 

the suspended entries are liquidated at 

the assessment rate calculated for the 

review period.10 Therefore, for an 

administrative review of a company to 

be conducted, there must be a 

reviewable, suspended entry to be 

liquidated at the newly calculated 

assessment rate.11

Based on our analysis of Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) information, we 

determined that 27 companies had no 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR.12 On December 15, 2023, we 

notified parties that we intended to 

rescind this administrative review with 

respect to the 27 companies, because 

those companies had no reviewable, 

suspended entries of subject 

merchandise; and we invited parties to 

comment.13 No parties commented on 

the notification of intent to rescind the 

review, in part. Accordingly, pursuant 

to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3) and (d)(4), we 

are rescinding the administrative review 

with respect to the 27 companies (listed 

in Appendix III of this notice) that had 

no reviewable, suspended entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR. 

Additionally, Aditya Forge Limited 

(Aditya), withdrew its request for a 

review of its entries. Therefore, because 

Aditya was the only company that 

requested a review of Aditya’s entries, 

and it timely withdrew its request, we 

are rescinding the review with respect 

to Aditya in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1).14

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) 

and (2) of the Act. Export price is 

calculated in accordance with section 

772 of the Act. NV is calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying these 

preliminary results, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Rate for Non-Selected Companies 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not address the establishment of a 

rate to be applied to companies not 

selected for individual examination 

when Commerce limits its examination 

in an administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in a 

market economy investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the rate for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
74886 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 178 / Friday, September 13, 2024 / Notices 

15See Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of Margin for 

Respondents Not Selected for Individual 

Examination,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. 

16See Appendix II for a list of companies not 

selected for individual examination. 

17See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

18See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

19See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2). 

20See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

21We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an 

argument that Commerce would normally address 

in a comment of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

22See Administrative Protective Order, Service, 

and Other Procedures in Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings; Final Rule, 88 FR 

67069 (September 29, 2023). 

23See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

24See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 

(February 14, 2012). 

25 Id., 77 FR at 8102–03; see also 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2). 

26See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ 

In this administrative review, we 

preliminarily calculated weightedaverage dumping margins for Norma 

Group and RNG that are not zero, de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), or 

determined entirely on the basis of facts 

available. Accordingly, consistent with 

guidance in section 735(c)(5)(A) of the 

Act, Commerce is preliminarily 

assigning to the companies not 

individually examined a margin of 2.89 

percent, which is the weighted average 

of the dumping margins calculated for 

Norma Group margin and RNG based on 

publicly ranged U.S. sales values.15 The 

companies not selected for individual 

examination are listed in Appendix II. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that the following estimated weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period August 1, 2022, through July 31, 

2023: 

Producer/exporter 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

R. N. Gupta & Company Limited ................................................................................................................................................. 4.00 

Norma (India) Limited/USK Exports Private Limited/Uma Shanker Khandelwal & Co./Bansidhar Chiranjilal ........................... 1.14 

Non-Selected Companies 16 ........................................................................................................................................................ 2.89 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed for these preliminary results 

within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice.17 Interested 

parties may submit case briefs no later 

than 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.18 Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in case 

briefs, may be filed no later than seven 

days after the date for filing case 

briefs.19 Parties who submit case briefs 

or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are 

encouraged to submit with each 

argument: (1) a statement of the issue; 

(2) a brief summary of the argument; 

and (3) a table of authorities.20

As provided under 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 

proceedings we have encouraged 

interested parties to provide an 

executive summary of their briefs that 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes. In this review, we 

instead request that interested parties 

provide at the beginning of their briefs 

a public, executive summary for each 

issue raised in their briefs.21 Further, we 

request that interested parties limit their 

public executive summary of each issue 

to no more than 450 words, not 

including citations. We intend to use 

the public executive summaries as the 

basis of the comment summaries 

included in the issues and decision 

memorandum that will accompany the 

final results in this administrative 

review. We request that interested 

parties include footnotes for relevant 

citations in the public executive 

summary of each issue. Note that 

Commerce has amended certain of its 

requirements pertaining to the service of 

documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).22

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, filed electronically via 

ACCESS, within 30 days after the date 

of publication of this notice. Requests 

should contain: (1) the party’s name, 

address, and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; (3) whether any 

participant is a foreign national; and (4) 

a list of the issues to be discussed. 

Issues raised in the hearing will be 

limited to those raised in the respective 

case and rebuttal briefs.23 If a request for 

a hearing is made, Commerce intends to 

hold the hearing at a date and time to 

be determined. Parties should confirm 

the date and time of the hearing two 

days before the scheduled date. All 

briefs and hearing requests must be filed 

electronically using ACCESS and 

received successfully in their entirety by 

5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. 

Unless the deadline is extended 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of our analysis of 

the issues raised by the parties in any 

written briefs, no later than 120 days 

after the date of publication of these 

preliminary results. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of this 

administrative review, Commerce shall 

determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. If the weighted-average 

dumping margin for a mandatory 

respondent is not zero or de minimis in 

the final results of this review, we will 

calculate an importer-specific 

assessment rate on the basis of the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for each importer’s examined 

sales and the total entered value of such 

sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).24 If the weighted-average 

dumping margin is zero or de minimis 

in the final results of review, or if an 

importer-specific assessment rate is zero 

or de minimis, Commerce will instruct 

CBP to liquidate appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties.25

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the period of review produced by 

the respondents for which they did not 

know its merchandise was destined for 

the United States, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate unreviewed entries 

pursuant to the reseller policy, i.e., the 

assessment rate for such entries will be 

the all-others rate established in the 

investigation if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.26

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual examination, we 

intend to assign an antidumping duty 

assessment rate equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin determined for 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 178 / Friday, September 13, 2024 / Notices 74887 

27See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

28See Order, 82 FR at 40138. 

1See Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from 

Argentina, Colombia, Egypt, the Netherlands, Saudi 

Arabia, Taiwan, the Republic of Turkey, and the 

Continued 

the non-examined companies in the 

final results of review. 

For the companies for which the 

administrative review is rescinded, 

antidumping duties shall be assessed at 

a rate equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). The final 

results of this review shall be the basis 

for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise 

covered by the final results of this 

review and for future cash deposits of 

estimated antidumping duties, where 

applicable.27

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication in the Federal Register of 

the final results of this administrative 

review for all shipments of the subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the date of publication, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for companies subject 

to this review will be equal to the 

company-specific weighted-average 

dumping margin established in the final 

results of this administrative review; (2) 

for merchandise exported by a company 

not covered in this review but covered 

in a prior segment of the proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published in the 

completed segment for the most recent 

period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review, a prior review, 

or the less-than-fair-value investigation, 

but the producer is, then the cash 

deposit rate will be the rate established 

in the most recently completed segment 

of the proceeding for the producer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other producers or exporters 

will continue to be 8.91 percent, the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value investigation.28 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties, and/or an increase in the amount 

of antidumping duties by the amount of 

countervailing duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These preliminary results of review 

are issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: September 6, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Rescission of Review, In Part 

IV. Rates for Non-Examined Companies 

V. Discussion of the Methodology 

VI. Currency Conversion 

VII. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

List of Companies Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

1. Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd. 

2. C.D. Industries 

3. Cetus Engineering Private Limited 

4. Echjay Industries Pvt. Ltd. 

5. JAI Auto Private Limited 

6. Jiten Steel Industries. 

7. Munish Forge Private Limited 

8. R. D. Forge 

9. Renin Piping Products 

10. Rollwell Forge Engineering Components 

and Flanges 

11. Rollwell Forge Pvt. Ltd. 

12. Tirupati Forge Pvt. Ltd.; Tirupati Forge 

Appendix III 

Companies for Which Commerce Is 

Rescinding This Review 

1. Adinath International 

2. Aditya Forge Limited 

3. Allena Group 

4. Alloyed Steel 

5. Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited 

6. CHW Forge 

7. CHW Forge Pvt. Ltd. 

8. Citizen Metal Depot 

9. Corum Flange 

10. DN Forge Industries 

11. Echjay Forgings Limited 

12. Falcon Valves and Flanges Private 

Limited 

13. Heubach International. 

14. Hindon Forge Pvt. Ltd. 

15. Kinnari Steel Corporation 

16. M F Rings and Bearing Races Ltd 

17. Mascot Metal Manufacturers 

18. OM Exports 

19. Punjab Steel Works 

20. Raaj Sagar Steels 

21. Ravi Ratan Metal Industries 

22. Rolex Fittings India Pvt. Ltd 

23. SHM (ShinHeung Machinery) 

24. Siddhagiri Metal & Tubes 

25. Sizer India 

26. Steel Shape India 

27. Sudhir Forgings Pvt. Ltd. 

28. Umashanker Khandelwal Forging Limited 

[FR Doc. 2024–20751 Filed 9–12–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–520–809] 

Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire 

Strand From the United Arab Emirates: 

Initiation of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) has determined 

that a request for a new shipper review 

(NSR) of the antidumping duty order on 

prestressed concrete steel wire strand 

(PC strand) from the United Arab 

Emirates (UAE) meets the statutory and 

regulatory requirements for initiation. 

The period of review (POR) for the NSR 

is February 1, 2024, through July 31, 

2024. 

DATES: Applicable September 13, 2024, 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alexander Cipolla or Brendan Quinn, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4956 or 

(202) 482–5848, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce published the order on PC 

Strand from the UAE on February 1, 

2021.1 On August 6, 2024, pursuant to 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES