alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
combustionsurvey - Fw: ERC comments 

 

-----Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/16/2011 03:51PM -----

To: Toni Jones/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Ted Michaels" <tmichaels@energyrecoverycouncil.org> 

Date: 07/14/2011 04:42PM 

Cc: <aszurgot@covantanergy.com>, "'Brasowski,Leon'" <LBrasowski@CovantaEnergy.com>, 

<tporter@wm.com> 

Subject: ERC comments 

(See attached file: 110714 BMACT CISWI reconsideration comments.pdf) 

(See attached file: 101129 SSI MACT comments.pdf) 

(See attached file: 101129 SSI MACT Comments attachment.xls)

Please find attached correspondence on the Petition for Administrative Reconsideration and Amendment of Industrial Boiler MACT 

and CISWI Rules. Please let me know if you have any questions. 

Best,

Ted Michaels

Ted Michaels

President

Energy Recovery Council

1730 Rhode Island Avenue, NW 

Suite 700

Washington, DC 20036

202-467-6240

tmichaels@energyrecoverycouncil.org

www.energyrecoverycouncil.org

From: Brian Shrager <Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <combustionsurvey@erg.com>

Date: 7/16/2011 3:52 PM

Subject: Fw: ERC comments

Attachments:

 

110714 BMACT CISWI reconsideration comments.pdf; 101129 SSI MACT comments.pdf; 

101129 SSI MACT Comments attachment.xls

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E21B3A5DO... 8/2/2011
= 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E21B3A5DO... 8/2/2011
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Frank W. Getman Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of BayCorp
Holdings, Ltd., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BayCorp Holdings,
Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared.
     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
     b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  November 6, 2003          By:   /s/ Frank W. Getman Jr.
                                     ---------------------------
                                      Frank W. Getman Jr.
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer
                                      (principal financial officer)
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Acting Chief Financial Officer of Novoste Corporation (the Company), each
hereby certify that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2004 |  | /s/ ALFRED J. NOVAK                                                    
|                       |  | Alfred J. Novak, Chief Executive Officer of Novoste Corporation        
|                       | 
|Date: November 9, 2004 |  | /s/ SUBHASH C. SARDA                                                   
|                       |  | Subhash C. Sarda, Acting Chief Financial Officer of Novoste Corporation



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Novoste Corporation and will be retained by Novoste Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as
part of the Form 10-Q.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2396 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2396

To amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to prohibit certain waivers and 
   exemptions from emergency preparedness and response and security 
                              regulations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2018

Ms. Harris (for herself, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Markey, and Mrs. Gillibrand) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to prohibit certain waivers and 
   exemptions from emergency preparedness and response and security 
                              regulations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe and Secure Decommissioning Act 
of 2018''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN WAIVERS AND EXEMPTIONS.

    Chapter 19 of title I of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 
2015 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 276 the following:

``SEC. 277. PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN WAIVERS AND EXEMPTIONS.

    ``(a) Definitions.--In this section:
            ``(1) Covered regulation.--The term `covered regulation' 
        means--
                    ``(A) an emergency preparedness or response 
                regulation or requirement; or
                    ``(B) a security regulation or requirement 
                applicable to spent nuclear fuel.
            ``(2) Licensee.--The term `licensee' has the meaning given 
        the term in section 50.2 of title 10, Code of Federal 
        Regulations (or any successor regulation).
    ``(b) Prohibition of Certain Waivers and Exemptions.--Subject to 
subsection (c), the Commission shall not approve the request of a 
licensee for a waiver of, or exemption from, a covered regulation 
applicable to a civilian nuclear power reactor that has permanently 
ceased to operate.
    ``(c) Limitation.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to a civilian 
nuclear power reactor described in that subsection at which all spent 
nuclear fuel has been transferred to spent nuclear fuel dry casks.''.
                                 <all>
```
07/01/201 1 09;4 0 FA X 202493514 2 FA A+ DM S g|001/00 1

;-AR"iMEi\TO F •[••ioPORl'ATIO N r.;:iT)?En/UlO^ - UNITE D STAlE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA L AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

WASHINGTON , D C I n th e Matte r

of : GOJE T AIRLINES . LL C (V D GEA R Docke t No . CP10CE000 3 FDM S No . FAA-2010-002 5 Served : Jun e 30,201 1 EXTENSIO N O FTIM E Th e appeal brie f

o f Responden t

GoJe t Airlines , LLC (V D Gea

r Pins ) i s du e on Jul y 18 , 2011 . B y documen t date dJun e 28 , 2011 , Respondent' s counse l request s a n extensio n o f

tim e unti l Augus t

11 , 2011 , t o file hi s appea l brief . Respondent' s counse l represent s that

counse l for

Complainan t

Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n doe s no t oppos e Respondent' s motio n for

extensio n o f

rime . Th e reques t

fo r a n extensio n o f

lim e i n whic h t o fil e Respondent' s appea l brie f i s granted . Respondent' s appeal brie f i s no w du e to b e filedon o r before Augus t

11 , 2011. ' J . RANDOLP H BABBITT , ADMINISTRATO R Federal Aviatio n Administratio n > I ' 1 '- !

VICK I S . LEEMON ' Manager , Adjudicatio n Branc h

' Th e ''mailin g rule " (1 4 C.F.R . § 13.211(e)) , whic h provide s fo r 5 additional day s aflt

T servic e b y mail , doe s no t

appl y t o thi s extension . ^ Issue dunde r

authority delegate dto th e Chie f Counse l andth e Assistan t Chie f Counse l for Litigatio n by Memorandu mdate dOctobe r 27 , 1992 , under

4 9 D.S.C . § 322(b ) and1 4 C.F.R . § ] 3.20 2 {se

e 5 7 Fed . Reg . 58,28 0 (1992) ) andrcdclcgale db y th e Assistan t

Chie f Counse l for Litigatio n t o th e Manager , Adjudicatio n Branch , b y Memorandu mdate dAugus t 6 , 1993 .
EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 We consent to the incorporation by  reference in the Registration  Statement
 on Form S-8 No.'s 33-42056, 33-48514, 33-80028, 333-27193,  and 333-36314 of
 our report  dated May 10,  2003, with respect to the consolidated  financial
 statements and schedule of Sport  Supply Group,  Inc. included in  this Form
 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2003.


                                         ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 Dallas, Texas
 July 11, 2003
<PAGE>   1
                                                            Exhibit 10.49

[logo]
Citizens 
Bank

May 15, 1997


Mr. Michael Medors
Secretary-Treasurer
Bigmar, Inc.
6660 Doubletree Ave.
Columbus, OH 43229

Dear Mr. Medors:

This letter will confirm that Citizens Bank has approved for Bigmar, Inc., a 
Three Million Five Hundred Thousand and no/100 Dollar ($3,500,000.00) line of 
credit. Said line of credit will be made available on an unsecured basis, 
however, support for the line will be provided by the personal guarantees of 
Harold C. & Janet A. Baldauf, Frederick H. May, Jr. & Cynthia R. May, and John 
G. Tramontana & Debbie Ruyan Tramontana.

Any borrowings against the line of credit will be at the rate announced from 
time to time by Citizens Bank as its prime commercial lending rate. Based on 
today's prime rate, the interest rate would be 8.5%. Borrower's primary deposit 
relationship is to be maintained at Citizens Bank, and proceeds from any 
borrowings will be directly deposited to one of Borrower's deposit accounts.

Other terms and conditions of any borrowings will be specified in the loan 
documents which will be prepared for signature.

We are pleased to provide this credit facility to Bigmar, Inc., and look 
forward to continued business in the future.

Sincerely,

/s/ PAMELA K. WINTERS
---------------------
    Pamela K. Winters
    Vice President
ex335.htm


    Exhibit
10.5

     

    
 

    
      AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

       

      This Amendment to Executive Employment
Agreement is executed this 6th day of
November, 2008 by and between Gen2Media Corp. (the Company) and Mark
Argenti (Employee).

       

      1.           This
Agreement amends that certain Executive Employment Agreement between the parties
dated May 1, 2008 (the Agreement).

       

      2.           The
Agreement is hereby amended to provide that the base salary of the Employee is
changed to $125,000 per year for the life of the Agreement. This increase shall
be effective as of November 1, 2008, and shall be paid beginning with the
November 15 paycheck.

       

      3.           The
Agreement is further amended to provide that the Incentive Bonus provided in
paragraph 3(b) thereof is eliminated, and there shall no longer be a cash bonus
provision in the Agreement.

       

      4.           In
consideration of this Amendment, Employee hereby forgives any and all past
salaries or other compensation due him from prior services rendered to the
Company.

       

      5.           Other
than as specifically amended hereby, all other terms and provisions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

       

      Wherefore, this Agreement is entered
into this 6th day of
November, 2008.

       

       

      
        
          
            
              
                
                  
                    
                      
                        
                          	Gen2Media
      Corp.	 	Employee	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	
                                  /s/

                                	 	By:	
                                  /s/
      

                                	 
	 	
                                  Jim
      Byrd, CEO

                                	 	 	Mark
    Argenti
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Post Properties, Inc.
(Post) and Post Apartment Homes, L.P. (PAH, and together with Post, the
Registrants) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Post
and Post GP Holdings, Inc., PAHs general partner, certifies that:  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Registrants. /s/ Christopher J. Papa

Christopher J. PapaExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerNovember 9, 2004
 -58-
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY

40 CFR Part 70 

### [EPA-R07-OAR-2009-0860; FRL ] Approval and Promulgation of Operating Permits Program ; State of Iowa AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) . ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve a revision to the Iowa State Operating Permits Programsubmitted by the State on February 20, 2009. The purpose of this revision is to increase emissions fees for the Title V Operating Permits Program . EPA is proposing to approve this revision pursuant to section 502 of the Clean Air Act and implementing regulations. DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received in writing by [insert date 30 days fromthe date of publication in the Federal Register] . ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2009-0860, by mail to Tracey Casburn, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Comments may also be submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule located in the rules section of this Federal Register.2

FOR FURTHER INFORMATIONCONTACT: Tracey Casburn at (913) 551- 7016, or by e-mail at casburn.tracey@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of the Federal Register, EPA is approving the state's revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial revision amendment and anticipates no relevant adverse comments to this action. A detailed.rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this action, no further activity is contemplated in relation to this action. If EPA receives relevant adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed action. EPAwill not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on part of this rule and if that part can be severed fromthe remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as~final those parts of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For additional information, see3

the direct final rule which is located in the rules section of this Federal Register. 

### 11 Dated: ;



### February 16, 2010 Karl Brooks, Regional Administrator, Region7.
#### HAMMOND v. STATE.

No. 15906.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 10, 1933.

Hamilton, Fitzgerald & Grundy, of Memphis, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The accomplice witness R. L. Harrell testified that he, appellant, and Clifford Moses burglarized a house belonging to C. R. Bad-gett, and took therefrom certain corporeal personal property. This property was re- ' covered by the officers, being found on the premises of the accomplice’s father. It does not appear that appellant lived on these premises. The state relied largely upon the fact that appellant was seen with the accomplice and Moses in a café in the vicinity of the burglarized premises on the night of the burglary. The accomplice witness testified that he was with appellant at this café shortly prior to the time the house was burglarized. State’s witness Vanwinkle testified that he saw appellant with the accomplice witness and Moses in his café on the night of the burglary. He declared that this was the only time he had seen appellant and his companions. He said, however, that he would positively identify the parties. After the witness had given this testimony, the state called the sheriff, who testified that on the afternoon following the burglary the witness Vanwinkle came to the examining trial and pointed out the accomplice, appellant, and Moses as the three boys who were in his café shortly before the burglary. This proof was made over appellant’s proper objection. The matter presents reversible error. The fact that appellant was present with the accomplice and Moses before the burglary was relied upon by the state as one of the corroborative circumstances. The hearsay testimony in question could have had no other effect than to bolster'up the testimony of the witness Vanwinkle; See Haughton v. State, 99 Tex. Cr. R. 42, 267 S. W. 715; Fortune v. State, 96 Tex. Cr. R. 569, 259 S. W. 573.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,388
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,213
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,360
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,391
<PP&E>                                           5,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                     306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,012
<BONDS>                                            850
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,812
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   139,747
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,375
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,818
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,730
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,005
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,725
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,725
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
        

</TABLE>