alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1. | Amendment.  The second sentence of the first paragraph of clause (ii) of Section 3(b) of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | No Other Modification or Amendment.  Except as specifically provided herein, the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement is not modified or amended in any respect and remains in full force and effect. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York (determined without regard to the choice of law provisions thereof), and the parties consent to jurisdiction in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed by the parties hereto in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but both such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same document. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| LIFETIME BRANDS, INC.                                                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  By: /s/ Jeffrey Siegel                                                                                |
|            Name: Jeffrey Siegel                      |
|            Title:   CEO and President |
|   EXECUTIVE                                                                                       |
|  /s/ Ronald Shiftan                                                                                    |
|           Ronald Shiftan                                  |
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-3122]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Digital Imaging Group, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 19, 1999, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Digital Imaging Group, Inc. 
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Photoloft.com, Campbell, CA; PhotoHighway.com, Monterey, 
CA; ACD Systems, Victoria, BC, CANADA; Lightsurf Technologies, Inc., 
Scotts Valley, CA; Seattle Film Works, Seattle, WA; Digitella 
Technology, Inc., Irvine, CA; Signafy, Inc., Princeton, NJ; 
Intellectual Protocols, Nannet, NY; RCO, Los Angeles, CA; MediaSec 
Technologies, Essen, GERMANY; and CNS Development, Colleyville, TX have 
been added as parties to this venture. Also, PictureVision, Inc., 
Herndon, VA; AccuSoft, Westborough, MA; Digital Zone International A/S, 
Aarhus C, DENMARK; and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Suwon, Kyungki-D, 
SOUTH KOREA have been dropped as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the joint venture. Membership in this joint venture remains 
open, and Digital Imaging Group, Inc. intends to file additional 
written notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On September 25, 1997, Digital Imaging Group, Inc. filed its 
original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on November 10, 1997 (62 FR 60530).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 10 
1999. A notice has not yet been published in the Federal Register.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-3122 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
EXHIBIT 23.1








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-1 (File No. 333-113821), Form
S-1 (File No. 333-146779) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-121399) of Applied
NeuroSolutions, Inc. of our report datedMarch 24, 2009, which
appears on page 36 of this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008.








/s/
VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP








Chicago,
Illinois


March 30,
2009
#### KEY v. FORSHAGEN.

No. 1317.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Jan. 28, 1933.

R. B. Russell, of San Antonio, for appellant.

J. C. Romberg, of Gonzales, for appellee.

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This suit, based on a promissory note due September 15, 1927, was filed September 15, 1931. The defendant’s plea of limitation was overruled, and judgment entered for plaintiff. The defendant appealed.

• [1,2] The defendant had all of September 15, 1927, in which to pay the note, and the cause of action therefore did not accrue until September 16, 1927. 6 Tex. Jur. 680, 878; Standard v. Thurmond (Tex. Civ. App.) 151 S. W. 627; Smith v. Dickey, 74 Tex. 61, 11 S. W. 1049; Geistweidt v. Mann (Tex. Civ. App.) 37 S. W. 372; Payne v. Wittenberg (Tex. Civ. App.) 239 S. W. 224. The suit was filed within four years from the time the cause of action accrued, and was not barred by limitation. Revised Statutes, article *5527;*Watkins v. Willis & Bro., 58 Tex. 521.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Medivation, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 13, 2007



|       |  |                                                  
|------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/ C. Patrick Machado                           
|Name:  |  | C. Patrick Machado                               
|Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00325-CV

In the Interest of J.L., Minor Child

On appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2013-FAM-62325-5

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 5, 2015.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7193

DENNIS E. YARRELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CAROLINE BUCHANAN, Mailroom Clerk; MARCUSHUGHES, Superintendent at Avery-Mitchell Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-148-1-MU-2) Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 6, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis E. Yarrell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Dennis E. Yarrell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Yarrell v. Buchanan , No. CA-01-148-1-MU-2(W.D.N.C. filed July 11, 2001 & entered July 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT 3.1(d)
                                --------------

             CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                      of

                          SANTA MARIA RESOURCES, INC.

                             A Nevada Corporation


We the undersigned, President and Assistant Secretary of Santa Maria Resources,
Inc., a Nevada Corporation, do hereby certify:

That the Shareholders of said corporation, at a meeting duly convened and held
in Las Vegas, Nevada on July 22, 1997 were presented with a resolution whereby
the Board of Directors would amend Articles IV of the Articles of Incorporation.
That a majority of the shareholders were represented at the meting of
stockholders either in person or by proxy. That a majority of the shareholders
with voting rights at said meting authorized the Board of Directors to amend
Article IV of the Articles of Incorporation to read as follows:


                                  ARTICLE IV
                                 CAPITAL STOCK

     The amount of the total authorized stock of this Corporation shall
     be One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares of common stock with a
     par value of $0.01 per share, all of which stock shall be entitled
     to voting power. Shareholders shall not have pre-emptive rights or
     be entitled to cumulative voting in connection with the shares of
     the Corporation's common stock.

That the Board of Directors of said corporation at a meeting duly convened and
held in Las Vegas, Nevada on July 24, 1997, adopted a resolution to amend the
Articles of incorporation so that Article IV of the Articles of Incorporation
shall read as follows:


                                  ARTICLE IV
                                 CAPITAL STOCK

     The amount of the total authorized stock of this Corporation shall
     be One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares of common stock with a
     par value of $0.01 per share, all of which stock shall be entitled
     to voting power. Shareholders shall not have pre-emptive rights or
     be entitled to cumulative voting in connection with the shares of
     the Corporation's common stock.

                                      34
<PAGE>

_______________________________              __________________________________
          President                                  Assistant Secretary


Acknowledgement:

State of ____________________

County of ___________________


On ________________________ personally appeared before me, a Notary Public,
_________________________, President and _______________________, Assistant
Secretary who acknowledged they executed the above instrument on behalf of said
corporation.


_____________________________
Notary Public

                                      35
<PAGE>

Acknowledgement:


State of Nevada
County of Clark

On October 7, 1997 personally appeared before me, a Notary Public, Alan H.
Russell, Assistant Secretary who acknowledged he executed the above instrument
on behalf of said corporation.


___________________________
Notary Public

                                      36
APARTMEN T O F •;AN3P0RWI0 N :'" T OPERATION S 12 5 Eagle s Nes t

Lane Crescen t Cit y Florida , 3211 2 U.S . Departmen

t of Transportatio n M-3 0 120 0 New Jerse

y Ave . SE . Wes t Buildin g Groun

d Floo r Roo mW12-140 , Washington , D.C . 20590-0001 . 21=^ . Januar y 2011 . Dea r Sir/Mada m Re:

- FA A Docke t No.FAA-2010-114 6 an d Airspac e Docke t No . 10-ASO-2 5 A s resident s o f

Eagle s Nes t

Airpar k FD44 , w e ar

e ver y concerne d re . th e above proposal s tha t creat e new restricte d area s in effec t denying u s a

n eas t / wes t transi t route . W e regularl y us e th e eas t

/ wes t rout e betwee n restricte d area s R290 6 an d R2907 A ove r foreste d terrai n tha

t fo r safet y reason s require s aminimu maltitude o f

150 0 feet . W e understan d tha

t ther e als o Wildernes s area s tha

t woul d conflict

wit h thes e proposals . W e hop e tha t acompromis e o f

a t leas t a1500f t ceiling usin g th e existin g corrido r woul d b e acceptable t

o th e Navy who w e appreciat e requir e th e bes t trainin g facilities . Your s faithfull y

»~J C Jan e and Roge

r Goodge r
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BAYCORP HOLDINGS, LTD. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,236
<SECURITIES>                                     4,478
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,930
<PP&E>                                         106,453
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,259
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,438
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               85
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,917
<SALES>                                         33,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,355
<CGS>                                           37,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,533
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 907
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,522)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          159
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,973)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.65)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PAUL N. CLARK PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of ICOS Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Paul N. Clark, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: March 7, 2006                  
|                                     
|/s/ PAUL N. CLARK                    
|Paul N. Clark                        
|Chairman of the Board of Directors,  
|Chief Executive Officer and President
ANTOINE DANIELLE

PEARSON

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 1799

Opinion filed June 8, 2016.

Petition for Habeas Corpus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

William Mallory Kent of The Law Office of William Mallory Kent, Jacksonville , for

Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tayo P opoola and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant

Attorneys General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied

.

LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 10.9.3


Ratification and Extension Agreement


          THIS Agreement is made and entered into
this 10th day of October, 2008, by and between Millennium Group Worldwide
Incorporated, a Florida corporation with its principal place of business at
2825 N. 10th Street, St. Augustine, Florida 32084 (“MGW”), and
Cameron Jacobs.


          WHEREAS,
MGW have entered into a purchase agreement dated March 1, 2007(the “Prior
purchase Agreement”); 


          WHEREAS,
the Prior purchase Agreement (at Section 4) was conditioned upon MGW obtaining
adequate funding under its Form S-1 Registration, such period of time having
already expired as a function of the registration and review process; 


          WHEREAS,
both MGW and Cameron Jacobs wish to ratify the Prior purchase Agreement and
extend the period that will satisfy the Section 4 condition as to timing. 


          NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
1.

	
MGW and
  Cameron Jacobs hereby ratify the Prior purchase Agreement in all respects; 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
2.

	
Section 4
  relating to timing of funding is extended to December 8, 2008; and 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
3.

	
This
  Agreement, together with the Prior purchase Agreement as hereby incorporated
  by reference, constitutes the entire understanding between the parties
  relating to the subject matter hereof, and no amendment or modification to
  this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon the parties unless made in
  writing and signed by each party.





          IN
WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date
first written above.






	
 

	
 

	
 


	
MILLENNIUM GROUP WORLD INCORPORATED 

	
 

	
CAMERON JACOBS


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
/s/ Julius
  Jackson Sr.

	
 

	
/s/ Cameron
  Jacobs


	


	
 

	



	
Julius
  Jackson, Sr., President

	
 

	
Cameron
  Jacobs
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 218 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 218

    To restrict the inclusion of social security account numbers on 
    documents sent by mail by the Federal Government, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2017

  Mr. Gardner introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To restrict the inclusion of social security account numbers on 
    documents sent by mail by the Federal Government, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Fraud Prevention Act 
of 2017''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTION OF SSNS ON DOCUMENTS SENT BY MAIL.

    (a) In General.--No department or agency of the Federal Government 
may include the social security account number of any individual on any 
document sent by mail unless the head of such department or agency 
determines that the inclusion of such social security number on such 
document is necessary.
    (b) Regulations.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the head of each department and agency of the 
Federal Government shall issue regulations specifying the circumstances 
under which inclusion of a social security account number on a document 
sent by mail is necessary. Such regulations shall include--
            (1) instructions for the partial redaction of social 
        security account numbers whenever feasible; and
            (2) a requirement that social security account numbers not 
        be visible on the outside of any package sent by mail.
    (c) Effective Date.--This Act shall apply with respect to documents 
sent by mail on or after the date that is 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```