alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                               5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                    Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 81,055
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          68,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                           117,295
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      275,210
<PP&E>                                                524,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (253,404)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        716,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               3,613,549
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                           750,000
<COMMON>                                              663,938
<OTHER-SE>                                         (4,558,670)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          716,797
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        5,549
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    1,235,929
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (115,976)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (1,132,360)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (1,132,360)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (1,132,360)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.02)


</TABLE>
# National Days of Prayer and Remembrance, 2024

Twenty-three years ago—on September 11, 2001—2,977 precious lives were ripped from us in an evil attack on our Nation. During these solemn days, we renew our sacred vow: Never Forget. Never forget the loved ones we lost. Never forget the first responders who ran toward the rubble to save others. Never forget the hundreds of thousands of patriots who signed up to serve in the years after. And never forget that, when an enemy tried to tear us apart, our country came together. We stood united.

While every year we mark this hallowed day, it is never easier. To all those who are grieving a lost child, parent, spouse, sibling, friend, or coworker—and to all those who still bear the wounds from that September morning—I know how hard this time can be. It can reopen that black hole in your chest, bringing you back to the moment you saw the news or the moment you got the phone call. Today and every day, the First Lady and I are holding you close to our hearts.

We are also thinking of all the families of Americans who showed extraordinary bravery, selflessness, and sacrifice that day. They are the firefighters, police officers, and first responders who ran into the inferno of jet fuel and debris at Ground Zero and refused to stop searching for months. They are the civilians and service members at the Pentagon who rushed into the fiery breach to rescue their colleagues. They are the passengers of Flight 93, who confronted terror with absolute courage. They are the heroes who signed up to serve and defend our homeland from future attacks. And they include every American—from communities across our country—who stepped up and stood together.

Today—as we remember all those we lost on that searing September day 23 years ago—let us renew our faith in one another. Let us continue to seek light, even in the darkest of hours. And drawing from their example, let us resolve to continue building a Nation that stands as a beacon of liberty and justice for all. That is the truest memorial to their lives—our actions, every day, to ensure that our democracy endures, that our freedom endures, and that the very soul of our Nation endures.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 6, 2024, through September 8, 2024, as National Days of Prayer and Remembrance. I ask that the people of the United States honor the victims of September 11, 2001, and their loved ones with prayer, contemplation, memorial services and visits, bells, candlelight vigils, and other activities. I invite people around the world to join. I call on the citizens of our Nation to give thanks for our many freedoms and blessings, and I invite all people of faith to join me in asking for God's continued guidance, mercy, and protection.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-four, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-ninth.

[FR Doc. 2024-20603

Billing code 3395-F4-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6819
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EARL TYRONE WILLIAMS, a/k/a Bucky Williams, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-103-HAR, CA-94-1774-HAR) Submitted: March 5, 1996 Decided: March 26, 1996 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Earl Tryone Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Welsh, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Although he raises several ineffective assistance of counsel claims, he fails to establish prejudice. Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). Furthermore, Appellant's sentence of supervised release for a crime committed onJuly 1, 1987, does not violate the Ex Post Facto clause. GozlonPeretz v. United States , 498 U.S. 395, 409-10 (1991). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### CARLTON v. STATE.

No. 15097.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 30, 1932.

Dan McGrath, of Amarillo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for aggravated assault; punishment, a fine of $50.

This case originated in the county court of Randall county, and is upon affidavit and information. The case must be reversed. There is no information. The affidavit is made by one Buster and sworn to before J. D. Barker, county attorney of Randall county, which appears to be correct, but what purports to be the information is no more than an unsigned affidavit starting out with the statement: “I, J. D. Barker, do solemnly swear,” etc., and concluding with a jurat which makes it appear that this was sworn to before J. D. Barker, county attorney. The form for an information is laid down in Forms 745, 746, Willson’s Texas Crim. Forms. An almost similar situation to this appears in Compton v. State, 71 Tex. Cr. R. 7, 158 S.W. 515, and authorities there cited. The Compton Case was reversed for the insufficiency of the information.

Inasmuch as the affidavit herein is sufficient to be the predicate for a prosecution, and a new information can be filed thereon, the cause will be reversed and remanded, and not reversed and dismissed. Sims v. State, 72 Tex. Cr. R. 533, 162 S. W. 1154.

 In this connection attention is called to the fact that by the revised Penal Code of 1925, art. 1149, the word “gross” before the word “negligence” in this statute was omitted. However, the pleader in this case has seen fit to charge that this assault was with “gross negligence.” Two methods of committing an assault of this character are set out in the statute, one, that such assault was willful; another, that it was with negligence. It is suggested that, if the state does notjfile a new affidavit, but contents itself with filing a new information, upon trial, the state could rely upon either a claim that the assault was committed willfully, or a claim that it was committed with negligence, but, if the latter is relied upon, the allegation being that the assault was committed with gross negligence, gross negligence should be defined in the charge of the court.

The judgment will be reversed, and the cause remanded.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 213 

To designate the wilderness within the Lake Clark National Park and 

Preserve in the State of Alaska as the Jay S. Hammond Wilderness Area. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2017 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself and Mr. SULLIVAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To designate the wilderness within the Lake Clark National 

Park and Preserve in the State of Alaska as the Jay 

S. Hammond Wilderness Area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jay S. Hammond Wil5 derness Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF JAY S. HAMMOND WILDERNESS 

7 AREA. 

8 (a) DESIGNATION.—The approximately 2,600,000 

9 acres of National Wilderness Preservation System land loVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:02 Feb 01, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S213.IS S213

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 213 IS

1 cated within the Lake Clark National Park and Preserve 

2 designated by section 201(e)(7)(a) of the Alaska National 

3 Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 

4 410hh(e)(7)(a)) shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Jay S. Hammond Wilderness Area’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the wilderness area referred to in subsection (a) 

9 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jay S. Ham10 mond Wilderness Area’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2264 

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 

to add Rhode Island to the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 21, 2017 

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 

Management Act to add Rhode Island to the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rhode Island Fisher5 men’s Fairness Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2264 IS

1 SEC. 2. ADDITION OF RHODE ISLAND TO THE MID-ATLAN2 TIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL. 

3 Section 302(a)(1)(B) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fish4 ery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 

5 1852(a)(1)(B)) is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘Rhode Island,’’ after ‘‘States 

7 of’’; 

8 (2) by inserting ‘‘Rhode Island,’’ after ‘‘except 

9 North Carolina,’’; 

10 (3) by striking ‘‘21’’ and inserting ‘‘23’’; and 

11 (4) by striking ‘‘13’’ and inserting ‘‘14’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51239 Summary Calendar CAROL JOHNENE MORRIS Petitioner-Appellant

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CV-139
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Carol Johnene Morris, former federal prisoner #76547-080, appeals the district court’s dismissal of her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. In that § 2241 petition, Morrisargued that because her stateand federal sentences should have run concurrently, she was entitled to a full credit against her federal sentence, and her supervised release term constituted an illegal extension ofher sentence. Morriswas released from Bureau ofPrisons custody in July 2004 and completed her concurrent, three-year terms of supervised release during the pendency of United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 13, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 05-51239

2 this appeal. As a result, Morris’s claims have been rendered moot. SeeSpencer
v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278-79 (5th Cir. 1987). Therefore, this appeal is dismissed as moot. Morris has filed several habeas applications challenging her federal and state convictions and sentences, as well as numerous civil rights suits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In 2000, Morris was barred from proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). In 2006, Morris was barred from filing any documents or pleadings in the Western District of Texas without prior written consent of a United States District Judge or Magistrate Judge. Morris is warned that future repetitive or frivolous filings in this court or any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction will result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal, monetary sanctions, and further restrictions on her ability to file pleadings in this court and any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction. APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 5, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-11277

Summary Calendar

 

JOHN T. ESPINOZA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ARLINGTON NATIONAL BANK,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:03-CV-574-Y

--------------------

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John T. Espinoza has filed a motion for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal following the district court’s

order dismissing his civil action for failure to comply with a

court order requiring him to file an amended complaint. By

moving for leave to proceed IFP, Espinoza is challenging the

district court’s certification that IFP should not be granted on

appeal because his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh

v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). 
No. 03-11277

-2-

Espinoza has not made a meritorious challenge to the

district court’s denial of IFP and has not shown that he will

raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(a)(3). Espinoza’s request for IFP status is DENIED, and

his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202

& n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. All of Espinoza’s other outstanding

motions are likewise DENIED. 

Espinoza is also cautioned that any additional frivolous

appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To

avoid sanctions, Espinoza should review any newly filed appeals

to ensure that they are not frivolous. 

IFP MOTION AND ALL OTHER OUTSTANDING MOTIONS DENIED. APPEAL

DISMISSED. SANCTIONS WARNING GIVEN.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 237 (Friday, December 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76989-76990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31238]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Air Force Officer Training School 
(OTS) Accession Forms; AETC Forms 1413 and 1422; OMB Number 0701-0080.

[[Page 76990]]

    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 1,200.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 1,200.
    Average Burden per Response: 1.25 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 1,500.
    Needs and Uses: These forms are used by Air Force field recruiters 
and education counselors in the processing of Officer Training School 
(OTS) applications. Respondents are civilian and active-duty candidates 
applying for a commission in the U.S. Air Force. These forms provide 
pertinent information to facilitate selection of candidates for a 
commission.
    Affected Public: Individuals or Households.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to Obtain or Retain Benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: November 30, 2000.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-31238 Filed 12-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Medivation, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
November 14, 2006



|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|/s/ David T. Hung, M.D.                                               
|Name: David T. Hung, M.D. Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
#### CAMPBELL v. STATE.

No. 20240.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 1, 1939.

Geo. E. Hosey, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is burglary of a private residence; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for ten years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM,

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


This Additional Exhibit is furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
in accordance with Commission Release No. 33-8212.

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of Interlott Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 28, 2003          /s/ David F. Nichols
                                --------------------------------
                                David F. Nichols
                                Chief Executive Officer

                                /s/ Dennis W. Blazer
                                --------------------------------
                                Dennis W. Blazer
                                Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Interlott Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Interlott
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.