alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

Donny Robert Melara dba Air Cam Shots

333 Petition Master File List:

333 PETITION:

efl 4 DONNY AirCamShots_FAA_UAS 333 PETITION

FLIGHT OPS MANUAL (FOM) **:

efl 4 DONNY_Melara _UAS FLEET OPS MAN_wMPTOM_CONFIDENTIAL 333 attachmt

MPTOM - FOM APPENDIX AA **:

efl 4 DONNY_Melara_UAS Flight MPTOM_ APDX AA_CONFIDENTIAL 333 attachmt

FOM APPENDIXES A – E **:

efl 4 DONNY_Melara_Air Cam Shots_UAS Flight Ops Man_ APDX A-E_CONFIDENTIAL 333 attachmt

*DJI PHANTOM 2 UAS:

P2 LINK: http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-2/download

PHANTOM2_Quick_Start_Guide_en

PHANTOM2_User_Manual_v1.4_en

PHANTOM_2_FPV_HUB_Kit_Instruction_v1.0_en

PHANTOM_2_kits_release_note_en

PHANTOM_2_Prop_Guard_Attachment_Instructions_v1.00

Phantom_2_Release_Notes_en

Smart_Flight_Battery_Safety_Guidelines

Zenmuse_H3_2D_Gimbal_Quick_Start_Guide

*DJI PHANTOM 3 UAS:

P3 LINK: http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-3

DJI Phantom_3_Professional_In_the_Box_en

DJI Phantom_3_Professional_Quick_Start_Guide_en

DJI Phantom_3_Professional_User_Manual_v1.2_en

Phantom_3_Professional_Release_Note_en

DJI P3p How_to_Update_Firmware_en

*DJI INSPIRE 1 UAS
Page 2 of 2

INSPIRE 1 LINK: http://www.dji.com/product/inspire-1/download

How_To_Upgrade_Firmware_en

Inspire_1_Disclaimer_and_Warning_en

Inspire_1_Disclaimer_and_Warning_en

Inspire_1_Firmwarev1.2.1.06_en

Inspire_1_In_the_Box_en

Inspire_1_Maintenance_ManualV1.0_en

Inspire_1_Release_Notes_en

Inspire_1_Safety_Guidelines_en

Inspire_1_User_Manual_v1.4_en

Intelligent_Flight_Battery_Safety_Guidelines_en

*DJI S1000 plus + A2 Flight Control UAS: 

S1000 plus LINK: http://www.dji.com/product/spreading-wings-s1000-plus/download

A2 FLIGHT CONTROLLER LINK: http://www.dji.com/product/a2/download

S1000_Plus_release_note_en

S1000_Plus_User_Manual_v1.2_en

A2_product_release_notes_en

A2_Quick_Start_Guide_v1.22_en

*Spektrum Dx8 RC-tx + iOSD controller for DJI S1000 plus UAS:

Spektrum LINKs: http://www.spektrumrc.com/Products/Default.aspx?ProdId=SPM8800

http://www.spektrumrc.com/ProdInfo/Files/SPM8800-Manual_EN.pdf

SPM8800-Manual_EN

SPM8800-Guide

SPM_Telemetry_Compatibility

iOSD_user_manual_v2.10_en

_________________________________________________________________________

* All listed files are available online 

** Proprietary – Confidential, not posted publicly to FAA docket, emailed to FAA docket sect.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 10, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 73407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20308]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AC24-130-000]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on August 30, 2024, Pacific Gas and Electric 
Company (PG&E) submitted a waiver request to the Chief Accountant of 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) related 
to Account 165, Prepayments, of the Commission's Uniform System of 
Accounts, to allow PG&E to apply a $500,000 materiality threshold for 
recording prepayments on its balance sheet. PG&E requests that this 
waiver is applied prospectively, for a period of ten years, ending 
December 31, 2034.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant. On or before the comment date, it is 
not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons 
other than the Applicant.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the 
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three 
digits in the docket number field to access the document.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, 
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link 
at http://www.ferc.gov. In lieu of electronic filing, you may submit a 
paper copy which must reference the Project docket number.

To file via USPS: Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Acting Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 
20426.
To file via any other courier: Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Acting Secretary, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, 
Maryland 20852.

    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on September 24, 2024.

    Dated: September 3, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-20308 Filed 9-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
**EXHIBIT 11**
```

```
                            JONES APPAREL GROUP, INC.
              Computation of Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share
                     (In millions except per share amounts)
```

```

                                         For the Year Ended December 31,
                                        --------------------------------
                                            2004        2003        2002
                                        --------    --------     -------
Basic Earnings per Share:
-------------------------
Net income...........................     $301.8      $328.6      $318.5
                                        ========    ========     =======

Weighted average number of shares
outstanding..........................      123.6       127.3       128.2
                                        ========    ========     =======

Basic earnings per share.............      $2.44       $2.58       $2.48
                                        ========    ========     =======

Diluted Earnings per Share:
---------------------------
Net income...........................     $301.8      $328.6      $318.5
Add: interest expense associated
     with convertible notes,
     net of tax benefit..............        0.8         9.5         9.1
                                        --------    --------     -------
Income available to common
  shareholders.......................     $302.6      $338.1      $327.6
                                        ========    ========     =======

Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding........................      123.6       127.3       128.2
Effect of dilutive securities:
  Employee stock options.............        2.2         1.3         2.9
  Assumed conversion of convertible
    notes............................        0.7         7.9         7.9
                                        --------    --------     -------
                                           126.5       136.5       139.0
                                        ========    ========     =======
Diluted earnings per share..........       $2.39       $2.48       $2.36
                                        ========    ========     =======
```
OSWER/OSRTI

Washington, DC 20460

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL) 

***Proposed Site*** October 2010 

MILFORD CONTAMINATEDAQUIFER Milford, Ohio

Clermont County

 Site Location:

The Milford Contaminated Aquifer site is a ground water plume contaminated with chlorinated solvents in the vicinity of

Main Street and Lila Avenue in the City of Milford, Clermont County, Ohio. 

 Site History:

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were first detected in City of Milford public wells in 1986. The Ohio Environmental 

Protection Agency began searching for the source of the VOC contamination in 1991. Despite several investigations, the 

source of VOC contamination has not been identified. 

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:

Chlorinated solvents detected in ground water at the site include tetrachloroethene (PCE); trichloroethene (TCE); cis-1,2-

dichloroethene (DCE); and 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA). The plume is estimated to extend approximately 3,000 feet from 

the well field to its probable origin east of the well field. 

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment: 

The City of Milford’s public supply wells were found to have been contaminated by VOCs. Samples collected from city 

well 3 before treatment contained PCE above its EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Act Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL), 

and TCE, cis-1,2-DCE, and 1,1,1-TCA above background levels. Samples collected from city wells 1 and 2 before 

treatment contained PCE and 1,1,1-TCA above background levels, and a sample collected from city well 4 before treatment 

was found to have 1,1,1-TCA above background levels. The City of Milford’s well field serves 6,000 people. 

 Response Activities (to date):

The City of Milford installed and maintains an air stripper to remove VOCs from its treated water.

 Need for NPL Listing:

The State of Ohio referred the site to EPA because of the elevated VOCs found in the ground water which have 

contaminated the City of Milford’s public water supply wells. EPA received a letter of support for placing this site on the 

NPL from the state.

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change 

as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these 

substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet 

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
#### ANDRADE v. DONNELLY.

No. 12955.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

Feb. 24, 1934.

Rehearing Denied April 6, 1934.

Slay & Simon, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Clay’Cooke, of Fort Worth, for appellee.

DATTIMORE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a dismissal of a hill of review.

Appellant filed a suit to set aside a judgment. The same was not set for trial for nearly a year and being then called for trial appellant moved for a continuance on account of the absence of a necessary witness. The hearing was postponed two days, at which latter day appellee filed a “Motion to Dismiss.” This lengthy document reviews the history of the litigation, sets up numerous alleged law defects in the bill filed, sets up facts claimed to show want of merit in the motion for continuance, and sets up facts which it is claimed show want of equity in the fact contentions of appellant in his bill of review.

As shown by the transcript, the court proceeded to consider appellee’s geheral demurrer and sustain same. Appellant requested leave to amend his bill and offered his amended pleading, which was already prepared. The court refused to allow him to file same, and then overruled his motion for continuance and sustained appellee’s motion without any evidence being taken and dismissed the cause.

A part of the amended bill of review cured some defective allegations, furnished a jurat and signature of counsel which were not in the original bill. That much would have worked no delay, occasioned no surprise to appellee, and would have furnished appellant a pleading upon which he could have gone to trial. The fact that a part of the. amended pleading made new parties not before the court does not give the court right to refuse the filing of the amendment. The judge could, after such filing, if proper, force appellant to trial in spite of the requested delay.

We do not consider it necessary to examine the merits of the motion for continuance, which was overruled by the court, and will assume that the court was justified in not granting the same.

It then became the right of the appellant to introduce his testimony by which he claimed a review. This right was taken away from him when the court sustained appellee’s *257“motion to dismiss.” The facts pleaded in such motion, if true, furnish strong reason why appellant should not be granted his review, but such facts are of no more probative force than if pleaded in defendant’s answer. The motion gives the court no power to assume them true and cut oft the plaintiff from attempting to prove his case.

A -part of the facts alleged in the motion to dismiss were matters of judicial procedure in the original suit and process thereunder, of which the trial court might, if the allegations were true, take judicial knowledge. But this court does not take judicial knowledge of proceedings in a civil suit in the district court and we have no way of knowing whether the trial court took judicial knowledge of such proceedings, or whether any such proceedings existed as a basis for the court’s action. Appellee’s pleading them does not prove them.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 76474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31248]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday January 4, 2013.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room STATUS: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered

    Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the event that the times 
or dates of these or any future meetings change, an announcement of the 
change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted 
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-31248 Filed 12-26-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF USCS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AS OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            8815
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    80311
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       4033
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                104314
<PP&E>                                          184484
<DEPRECIATION>                                   87778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  213984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            54177
<BONDS>                                           2079<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1172
<OTHER-SE>                                      129753<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    213984
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                216791
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   124579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 64315<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  27433
<INCOME-TAX>                                     10987
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              16446
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     16446
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68
<FN>
<F1>Consists of Notes Payable and Bonds Payable
<F2>Consists of Additional Paid-in Capital, Retained Earnings, Treasury Stock
and Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
<F3>Consists of Research and Development and Selling, General and 
Administrative Expenses
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Oi=F!CEOFTHEATTORNEY GkNERALOFTEXAS
AUSTINt&e oanvaasVOII made ia due time, the votes ~opntea andtabalsted and the Co. Judge marked
oa the **vote** tabulationsheet the aords~ *Beet&on ordered carried,'Slgpeil County Jud@. f &o~not f%ud in the papers or **tinutas** say proala- ;&atilyu the Co. Judge ever amde or auy evidenoe :'fbPt.a proelamatlon

was we.r 

### postedat the Court- @us.e door for 30 tiys. Ha, under art. 6961 reaXdwo bare aprimaftie case andavalld 'eldotion

even 

### thon@a

we oamwt find the procla- 'Iprtianorrecerd

of ltsharingbeem posted?

1. Terry Couuty is Wt. authorizedto hold an slection,~ wxler Artiole 696.4, of,the 

### aarised citil Statuteeof Texaf~, since the county is not enumeratedin the counties tlteMmna#dasbeneflciariee or theohopter. -v

Under the h01din.g of the Court of CriminalAp-. peals, in~ghoes T. State, 4% S. W. (2) 739, citedby joa it 

### ia our oy2inbuthat 

### the election ordered 

### in Terry county c4 &member 

### 8, 1924,~is vo3.d.

met epinion jtlst

a53ntloned

aonstruadArtiolo a959, lceY%seJd

Ciril statutos, $92& in respeot to the eharaoter and extentofpubllshednotioe,the 6tatutebelagr

Vlhe Comtp Judge shall issue au order for such electionand cause public hotieee thereof to be given for at least thirty days betors the day of eleotion,bj publication of the order tharef+or in sosaerxwspaptir

publishedin the county, if there be OPO.~ The etatutaIs UnC~sd.

The notice rhlch was held to be %nsufTident was publishediis

a dpLly paper in the oitF oi Houston ouco a reek for four succesalve reeks, begl.nn%ng

on Tuesday,April 22, 1930, and bml3.n.g on Tueedsy, Xay 13, 1930, the parlodbetween the first and laat publication being twenty-two

days. The electionras held in iiarrls County on Saturday,Uay 24, I930. ma wurt saiut

## 200

Honorableil.ii.virgilCrawford- page 3

aThe trot that the groat aqerity ei countiesin this State have no daily paper aouZd indicate that it 80s not the intention of the Legislatureto req&,re piblicat&m in a dally paper. Areokly piper, in
our opinion,would aawrer the reqairfment of thf3. etatute,but the publf4at.lon slust oontisnein each succoecdvelrrrrtls of the paper during at least thirty days before the day of election.*

Concerning

the electionheld In Terry County, you say1 *Terry Countyheld an eleotlo?a oa the abore on January 24, I%?S. The election
was orderedDeOe8OiW 8, 1934. end ~Otiot! tUtsot pubUsaea fram Dectuiber ,s2to Jaw uaryl20t1926. s&l& n0tL40was publl.ldIod for tNrty days b&ore the electionbut not ,&u?xt preoedj‘ng slmJe.*

ue tNnk these isets bx%ag ysur emotion with&n ,the,holdlng

of the hurt of i2'hhal A-18.

3. Xou ceuld not make 8 prbm Peale case for fhs elerriim of January’24, 1926, if tho mlmztes of the carmrrdo- .$#Uumrs* 

### Courts&mmthe truth,becau~,as WC have 8bom, .$W aotiaowas not rqplarly ptrbUsbedand for the ttrrthsr r!%sanae twder ahming the rosEa.lt of tmab oleotionhas War been recorded in tho dxmtes of the CuwUsdoaers~ -Art, as requiredby Article 8961, of the RerieedM-1 8tatutee,

the 3.av

being the s~lse

then as now.

I 

### very tray ywrs 

### ATTQRX2X
#### Zellerstean White, Respondent, v Kerri L. Johnson, *1004Appellant.

— Order unanimously affirmed with costs for the reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Boehm, J. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boehm, J. —dismiss complaint.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.
From: Hector.Ybanez@holcim.com

To: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 09/15/2010 02:37 PM Subject: another question

Keith another question for greenfield kilns that use to have a 50 ppm THC standard but these kilns are existing kilns under this rule, the promulgation of the final rule eliminated the 50 ppm THC standard so these sources would not have an applicable THC standard till 3 yrs after September 9 - Correct? thanks

_____________________ Hector Ybanez Corporate Manager, Envir onmental 122 West Carpenter Freeway Suite 485 Irving, Texas 75039 Phone (214) 524 - 2814 Cell (972) 268 - 1139 Hector.Ybanez@holcim.com hybanez@gmail.com www.holcim.com/us This e -mail is confidential and intended only for the use of the above named addressee . If you have received this e -mail in error, please delete it immediately and notify us by e -mail or telephone.
pei_8k-ex1006.htm


    EXHIBIT
10.6

    


    IRREVOCABLE
JOINT INSTRUCTION LETTER

     

     

    November
7, 2008

     

    Pacific
Ethanol California, Inc.

    400
Capitol Mall, Suite 2060

    Sacramento,
California 95814

     

    Ladies
and Gentlemen:

     

    Pacific
Ethanol Imperial, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“PE Imperial”),
Pacific Ethanol, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), you, and
Lyles United, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Lender”) have entered
into a Loan Restructuring Agreement dated as of November 7, 2008 (the “Agreement”) which
contemplates the execution and delivery of this Irrevocable Joint Instruction
Letter.

     

    Until
such time as Lender has informed you in writing that the New Note (as defined in
the Agreement) has been repaid in full, you are hereby irrevocably authorized
and instructed to immediately remit directly to Lender all future cash
distributions received on account of your ownership interest in (i) PE Imperial,
and (ii) Front Range Energy, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. All such
amounts remitted, despite being made directly by you to Lender, shall
nevertheless be considered a distribution to the Company and a payment by the
Company to Lender under the New Note.  By its execution hereof, Lender
hereby agrees to promptly inform you in writing at such time as the New Note has
been repaid in full.

     

    Lender is
a beneficiary hereof, and no amendment or modification to the authorization and
instructions set forth herein may be made without Lender’s written
consent.

     

    Very
truly yours,

    


    PACIFIC
ETHANOL, INC.

    


    


    By:/s/ NEIL M.
KOEHLER                                    


    Neil M.
Koehler, CEO

    


    LYLES
UNITED, LLC

    


    


    By:/s/ WILL
LYLES                                                 

    Will
Lyles, Vice President

     

    By its
execution hereof, Pacific Ethanol California, Inc. hereby represents and
warrants that it is authorized to enter into and execute this Irrevocable Joint
Instruction Letter and to perform its obligations contemplated herein and agrees
to perform all such obligations.

     

    ACKNOWLEDGED
AND AGREED:

     

    PACIFIC
ETHANOL CALIFORNIA, INC.

     

    


    By:/s/ JOHN T.
MILLER                                    


    John T.
Miller, COO