alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w1






EXHIBIT 10.1



PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT MARKED BY AN (***) HAVE BEEN OMITTED
PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.



AMENDMENT

(Spain and Benelux)



This amendment (“Amendment”) amends the Global Access Agreement between Amadeus IT Group, S.A. and
eBookers Limited dated June 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”) and is effective February 1, 2008 (the
“Amendment Effective Date”).



WHEREAS, the Parties desire to add the countries of Spain and Benelux as markets under the
Agreement subject to the terms and conditions of this Amendment;



IT IS AGREED:





	1.	 	Spain and Benelux. The countries of Spain and Benelux are added as countries under
Exhibit 2 of the Agreement. EBOOKERS Locations in such countries will come under the
Agreement.
	 
	2.	 	Second Additional Bonus. AMADEUS will pay EBOOKERS a payment of (***) within 30 days
of EBOOOKERS invoice in exchange for EBOOKERS producing an additional (***) Net Segments above
the current Total Target (i.e., (***) Net Segments as stated in Section 5 of the Complimentary
and Amendment Agreement dated 1st of September, 2006) for a new Total Target of
(***) Net Segment. In the event the new Total Target is not met at the end of the current
Term (i.e., 31st of December 2009 as per the Complimentary and Amendment Agreement)
then EBOOKERS will repay AMADEUS the amount of (***) per Net Segment short of the new Total
Target down to the current Total Target of (***) Net Segments. The repayment obligations with
respect to the Additional Bonus as described in Section 7 of the Complementary and Amendment
Agreement will remain in effect for Net Segments short of the current Total Target of (***)
Net Segments.
	 
	3.	 	Product Fund. The Product Fund may be used to help offset any start-up costs for
implementations in Spain and Benelux.
	 
	4.	 	Rules of Engagement. Section 14 of the Complimentary and Amendment Agreement (“Rules
of Engagement...”) will apply to this Amendment.
	 
	5.	 	All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect except as
modified by the above.





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Amadeus IT Group, S.A.	 	 	 	EBOOKERS LIMITED	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Gillian Gibson
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Alan Josephs	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	Name:

	 	Gillian Gibson
	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Alan Josephs	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	Group Vice President
	 	 	 	Title:
	 	MD	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	09/09/08
	 	 	 	Date:
	 	28/05/08
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q  of  CollaGenex
Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the period  ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned,  Brian M. Gallagher,  Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and Nancy C. Broadbent,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  CollaGenex  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.  and will be  retained by
CollaGenex  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc. and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                   /s/ Brian M. Gallagher, Ph.D.
                                   ---------------------------------
Dated:  August 14, 2003            Brian M. Gallagher, Ph.D.
                                   Chief Executive Officer



                                   /s/ Nancy C. Broadbent
                                   ---------------------------------
Dated:  August 14, 2003            Nancy C. Broadbent
                                   Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERDUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC.**

 

I, Marshall C. Turner, Chief Executive Officer of DuPont Photomasks,Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2004, as filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission, do hereby certify that to my knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company in respect of those items required to be describedor presented in such Report under Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934.

 
| /s/ MARSHALL C. TURNER  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Marshall C. Turner      |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

Date: November 5, 2004

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to DuPont Photomasks, Inc. and will be retained by DuPontPhotomasks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

I, Satish Rishi, Chief Financial Officer of DuPont Photomasks, Inc.(the “Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2004, as filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission, do hereby certify that to my knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company in respect of those items required to be describedor presented in such Report under Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934.

 
| /s/ SATISH RISHI        |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Satish Rishi            |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

Date: November 5, 2004

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to DuPont Photomasks, Inc. and will be retained by DuPontPhotomasks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 23.2



LOGO

BDOTel.: +52 (55) 8503 4200Fax: +52 (55) 8503 4299www.bdomexico.comCastillo Miranda y Compañía, S.C.Paseo de la Reforma 505-31Torre MayorColonia CuauhtémocMéxico, D.F.CP 06500Lifetime Brands, Inc.We hereby consent to incorporate in the 2013 Form 10-K of Lifetime
Brands, our report dated February 28, 2014, related to the audit we performed on the consolidated financial statements of Grupo Vasconia, S. A. B. and subsidiaries for the year ended as of December 31, 2013CASTILLO MIRANDA Y COMPAÑÍA, S. C.Member of BDO InternationalBernardo Soto Peñafiel, CPAMexico CityMarch 14, 201470 añosCastillo MirandaCastillo Miranda y Compañía, S. C. (BDO Castillo Miranda) es
una sociedad civil mexicana de contadores públicos y consultores de empresas, miembro de BDO International Limited, una compañía del Reino Unido limitada por garantia, y forma parte de la red internacional de firmas
independientes de BDO.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION ***     In connection with the Annual Report of Retail Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K)for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, James A. McGrady, Executive Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.        Dated April 5, 2007: By:  /s/ James A. McGrady    James A. McGrady, Executive VicePresident, Chief  Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary    * This Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theExchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shallnot be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.   A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 238 (Monday, December 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 77353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31430]



[[Page 77353]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-124-000]


Algonquin Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

December 5, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 30, 2000, Algonquin Gas Transmission 
Company (Algonquin) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1 and Original Volume No. 2, the following 
revised tariff sheets to become effective January 1, 2001;

Fourth Revised Volume 1

Second Revised Sheet No. 4
Original Sheet No. 36A
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 37
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 241
Original Sheet No. 241A
Second Revised Sheet No. 243
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 245
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 247
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 248
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 940
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 942

Original Volume No. 2

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 1B
First Revised Sheet No. 342

    Algonquin asserts that the purpose of this filing is to convert its 
firm lateral line transportation obligation to New England Power 
Company from Part 157 Rate Schedule X-37 to Part 284 Rate Schedule AFT-
CL pursuant to the automatic authorization conferred by Section 157.217 
of the Commission's regulations.
    Algonquin states that copies of the filing were mailed to all 
affected customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protect said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protest must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the intenet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-31430 Filed 12-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2243 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2243

  To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to authorize funding for the 
         voluntary public access and habitat incentive program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 18, 2017

Mr. Daines (for himself and Mr. Bennet) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to authorize funding for the 
         voluntary public access and habitat incentive program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Voluntary Public Access Improvement 
Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. VOLUNTARY PUBLIC ACCESS AND HABITAT INCENTIVE PROGRAM.

    Section 1240R(f)(1) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 
3839bb-5(f)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``practicable, $50,000,000'' and inserting 
        the following: ``practicable--
                    ``(A) $50,000,000'';
            (2) in subparagraph (A) (as so designated), by striking 
        ``2012 and $40,000,000'' and inserting the following: ``2012;
                    ``(B) $40,000,000''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (B) (as so designated), by striking the 
        period at the end and inserting the following: ``; and
                    ``(C) $150,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 
                2019 through 2023.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### WISE et al. v. SOUTHERN ROCK ISLAND PLOW CO.

No. 3923.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.

June 17, 1935.

Chas. H. Dean, of Dimmitt, for plaintiffs in error.

C. D. Russell, of Plainview, for defendant in error.

MARTIN, Justice.

On October 27,' 1931, defendant in error obtained a default judgment against plaintiffs in error in the district court of Castro county for the sum of $1,238.55.

Citation in error issued on April 20, 1932, and was served May 6, 1932. Writ of error bond was filed and approved April 18, 1932. Transcript was filed here on June 21, 1932.

An amicus curias brief has been filed, suggesting want of jurisdiction in this court for two reasons:

First, that the citation in error is defective in that its date of issuance is not noted thereon, as required by article 2260, R. S. Second, that the transcript was not filed with this court within sixty days from the filing and approval of the writ of error bond.

The facts appear to be against the first contention and the law against the second. There has been some confusion in the authorities with reference to the second question, but the Supreme Court has recently decided the question adversely to the contention noted above. See Tom R. Campbell v. First Nat. Bank of Lubbock et al. (Tex. Com. App.) 82 S.W.(2d) 954, opinion rendered May 22, 1935, not yet published [in State Report].

The original citation commands the defendants to appear before the October term, 1931, of the district court of Castro county, “then and there to answer the plaintiffs’ petition filed in a suit in said court on the-day of August, 1931.” The provision of article 2022, R. S. 1925, requiring citation to show the date when plaintiff’s petition was filed, is mandatory, and a citation containing either an omission of such date or its misstatement is fatally defective and will not support a default judgment. Conner v. W. C. Bowman Lbr. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 45 S.W. (2d) 237; National Ben Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. Scott (Tex. Civ. App.) 214 S. W. 604.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 21


                       VALUE CITY DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 State of               Percentage                      Doing
              Name                               Incorporation          Ownership                    Business as
              ----                               -------------          ---------                    -----------
<S>                                             <C>                    <C>                         <C>
              Carlyn Advertising
                 Agency, Inc.                   Ohio                   100%                        Carlyn

              DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc.          Missouri               100% indirect               DSW

              GB Retailers, Inc.                Delaware               100% indirect               Value City

              J. S. Overland Delivery, Inc.     Delaware               100%                        J.S. Overland
                                                                                                   Delivery, Inc.
              Value City Department
                 Stores Services, Inc.          Delaware               100% indirect               Value City

              Shonac Corporation                Ohio                   100%                        Shonac

              Value City of Michigan, Inc.      Michigan               100%                        Value City

              Value City Limited
                 Partnership                    Ohio*                  100% indirect               Value City of Kentucky LP

              VC Retailers, Inc.                Delaware               100% indirect               Value City

              Westerville Road LP, Inc.         Delaware               100%                        Value City

              Westerville Road GP, Inc.         Delaware               100%                        Value City

              Value City Acquisition Corp.      Delaware               100%                        Value City

              VC Acquisition, Inc.              Ohio                   100%                        Value City

              Base Acquisition Corp.            Delaware               100%                        Filene's Basement
</TABLE>



*This is a limited partnership, not an incorporated entity.



                                      E-9
#### AUSTIN NAT. BANK OF AUSTIN v. SHEPPARD, Comptroller of Public Accounts, et al.

No. 1764—6608.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.

May 2, 1934.

*247White, Taylor & Gardner and Black & Graves, all of Austin, and Thompson, Knight, Baker & Harris, of Dallas, for relator.

James V. Allred, Atty. Gen., and Sidney Benbow, Asst. Atty. Gen., both of Austin, for respondents.

GRITZ, Commissioner.

This is a eompanion case to cause No. 6607, Austin National Bank v. George H. Sheppard, State Comptroller, and Charley Lockhart, State Treasurer, this day decided by this commission (71 S.W.(2d) 242). It appears from the record that on May 29, 1920, Waggoner Electric Manufacturing Company was and still is a foreign corporation, duly incorporated under the laws of Missouri. It has a permit to do business in this state, and has had since said above date. On the date just mentioned, the company duly filed with the secretary of state of this state its articles of incorporation, and applied for a permit to do business in this state. On said date the company’s authorized capital stock was $5,000,000, of which $3,901,000 was subscribed. The company therefore paid the maximum filing fee or tax, $2,500. The secretary of state thereupon issued to the company the permit applied for.

Later the company amended its charter increasing its capital stock to $7,500,000. Of this increase stock $969,640 was subscribed. After the above amendment had been duly filed in its home state, the corporation in due time, and on June 15, 1922, tendered to the secretary of state of this state a certified copy thereof, with the request that same be filed in his office as required by our laws. The secretary of state refused to file such amendment unless and until the company paid an additional filing fee or tax of $1,-010. The company disputed the right to collect the additional fee or tax, but finally paid the same, only because the secretary of state refused to receive or file the charter amendment until such was done.

After the above events, the company presented its claim for the $1,010 to the Claims Committee of the Eorty-Third Legislature of this state. The claim was approved by said committee, and included in .the claims bill known as H. B. No. 919 (Acts 1933, c. 237). This bill was passed by both houses of the Legislature and approved by the Governor.

After the effectiveness of the above act, the comptroller issued to the company a warrant for the amount of its claim. The warrant was duly transferred to relator. Relator presented same to the treasurer for payment. The treasurer refused payment on the ground that the comptroller and the Attorney General had advised against it. This proceeding followed.

The facts of this case present exactly the same law questions as have been discussed and decided by us in cause No. 6607 above mentioned. Relator is entitled to the mandamus here prayed for under the law as announced in that decision.

The mandamus is granted as prayed for.

Opinion Adopted by the Supreme Court May 2, 1934.