alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: February 9, 2005



/s/    JOHN M. PALUMBOJohn M. PalumboChief Financial Officer
#### Ex parte BROOKS.

No. 17427.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 16, 1935.

Jackson & Street, of Denton, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

This appeal is from an order of the dis-iriet judge fixing bail in the sum of $4,000.

The record shows that appellant had been charged by complaint filed before W. A. Matthews, justice of the peace, with the robbery of Harry Owens by using and exhibiting a firearm, and taking from Owens the sum of $262. The justice of the peace, sitting as an examining court, placed appellant’s bond at $7,500. His wife had made some effort to secure bail for him in that amount, but without success. She then made application to Hon. B. W. Boyd, district judge, for a writ of habeas corpus, averring that the amount of bail fixed by the justice of >tbe peace was unreasonable, and that appellant was unable to make bond in said amount, “or in any other large amount.” The writ was granted, and after a hearing the said district judge reduced the amount of bail to $4,000. Without'making any effort to secure bond for the latter sum, notice of appeal was given to this court. There should be some showing of effort to make bond in the sum fixed by the district judge; if unable to make it, a motion might then be made before the judge setting up the facts, and requesting a further reduction in the bond. See Ex parte Thompson, 92 Tex. Cr. R. 291, 243 S. W. 910; Ex parte Atkinson, 92 Tex. Cr. R. 296, 243 S. W. 910.

We are not to be understood as intimating that bail 'in the sum of $4,000 is excessive. The ability or lack of ability to make bond does not alone control. Ex parte Jones, 107 Tex. Cr. R. 438, 296 S. W. 886; Ex parte Turner, 119 Tex. Cr. R. 149, 45 S.W.(2d) 1016. The circumstances of the alleged crime and the punishment permitted are to be considered. Ex parte Nelson (Tex. Cr. App.) 69 S.W.(2d) 126. The punishment of death may be inflicted for the offense of robbery with firearms. Article 1408, P. C.

For ,the reasons given, the relief prayed for is denied, and the judgment fixing bail at $4,000 is affirmed.
Unassociated Document


    [Fortress
      International Group, Inc. Letterhead]

     

    AMENDMENT
      NO. 1 TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     

    August
      26, 2008                    

    Timothy
      C. Dec

    c/o
      Fortress International Group, Inc.

    7226
      Lee
      DeForest Drive, Suite 203

    Columbia,
      MD 21046

     

    Dear
      Mr.
      Dec:

     

    Reference
      is hereby made to the Executive Employment Agreement, dated August 6 2007 (the
      “Agreement”), entered into between you (the “Executive”) and Fortress
      International Group, Inc.(the “Company”). Capitalized terms not defined in this
      Amendment shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.

     

    The
      parties hereby agree for a reduction of $5,000 of the Base Salary payable to
      Mr.
      Dec under the Agreement. 

     

    The
      Amendment is effective as of August 26, 2008. Except as otherwise set forth
      herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

     

    Please
      confirm your agreement with this Amendment by signing in the space provided
      below.

    


    
      	 	
              Yours
                Sincerely,

            
	 	 
	 	
              Fortress
                International Group, Inc. 

            
	 	 
	 	
              By:
                /s/ Thomas P.
                Rosato                    
                

            
	 	
              Name: 
                Thomas P. Rosato

            
	 	
              Title:   
                Chief Executive Officer

            


    

    


    Accepted
      and Agreed

    


    


    By:
      /s/
Timothy
      C.
      Dec                   


    Name:
      Timothy C. Dec
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 237 (Friday, December 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77001-77002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31326]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability of Patents for Exclusive License

AGENCY: Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command (SBCCOM), U.S. 
Army, DoD

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Reference the previous Federal Register notice (65 FR 68128), 
Tuesday, November 14, 2000, the notice announces the availability of 
Patents for Exclusive, Partially Exclusive or Nonexclusive Licenses. 
However, the notice should have stated: SBCCOM gives notice that it is 
contemplating the grant of an exclusive license in the United States 
and any applicable foreign country to practice the invention embodied 
in Patent Number 5,538,583, ``Method of Manufacturing a Laminated 
Textile Substrate for a Body Heating or Cooling Garment'' and Patent 
Number 5,320,164, ``Body Heating and Cooling Garment'' to Columbus 
Apparel Associates, Inc., (CAA) having a place of business in Woburn, 
Massachusetts.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Rosenkrans at U.S. Army 
Soldier and Biological Chemical Command, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 
01760, Phone; (508) 233-4928 or E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c092afa2a5b2b4ee92afb3a5aeabb2a1aeb380aea1b4a9a3abeea1b2adb9eeada9ac"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="12407d707760663c407d61777c7960737c61527c73667b71793c73607f6b3c7f7b7e">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any licenses granted shall comply with 35 
U.S.C. 209 AND 37 CFR part 404. The following Patent Numbers, Titles 
and Issue dates are provided:
Patent Number: 5,538,583
Title: Method of Manufacturing a Laminated Textile Substrate for a Body 
Heating or Cooling Garments
Issue Date: July 23, 1996
Patent Number: 5,320,164

[[Page 77002]]

Title: Body Heating or Cooling Garment
Issue Date: June 14, 1994

Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-31326 Filed 12-07-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### COFFMAN v. STATE.

No. 15356.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 25, 1932.

Philip Wolfe, of Pampa, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for arson, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before this court without a statement of facts or bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,602
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,275
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,070
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           7,407
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,528
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,793
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,542
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,189
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,262
<INCOME-TAX>                                       907
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,355
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,355
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 3.03
 Certificate of Amendment
of
Articles of Incorporation
of
Genelabs Technologies, Inc.
  1.
    
    They are the Chief Executive Officer and Assistant Secretary, of Genelabs Technologies, Inc.,
a California corporation.
 2.
    
    The THIRD Article of the Articles of Incorporation of this corporation is hereby amended such
that the following paragraph shall be inserted after the second paragraph thereof:
  3.
    
    The foregoing Amendment of Articles of Incorporation has been duly approved by the Board of
Directors.
 4.
    
    The foregoing Amendment of Articles of Incorporation has been duly approved by the required
vote of the holders of Common Stock pursuant to Section 903 of the California Corporations
Code. The total number of outstanding shares of Common Stock as of the record date of the
vote, April 22, 2005, is 88,503,779. No shares of Preferred Stock are outstanding. The number
of shares voting in favor of the amendment equaled or exceeded the vote required. The
percentage vote required was more than 50% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock.
   James A.D. SmithChief Executive Officer Adrian ArimaAssistant Secretary
#### Ex parte COOPER.

No. 20288.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 25, 1939.

Alex Mood, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

' Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Judge of the District Court of Johnson County refusing to reduce the amount of bail required in four felony, cases pending against the relator.

It is made to appear from the record that the relator was charged by complaint in the Justice Court of Johnson County with four cases of forgery; that upon a hearing before the magistrate she was allowed bail in the sum of $1,000 in each case to await the action of the grand jury; that relator then made application for a writ of habeas corpus before the District Judge of Johnson County; and that upon a hearing of said application the relator was remanded in the same amount of bail as was fixed by the magistrate.

The statement of facts is in question and answer form and therefore cannot be considered by this court. However, the statement of facts does contain the confession of the relator in which she admits her guilty connection with the offense charged.

It is the relator’s contention that she should be entitled to an outright discharge 'because of her affliction with tuberculosis which would render any species of confinement dangerous to her life. Such discharge would be prohibited under the terms of Art. 158, C.C.P., which declares: “Where, upon an examination under habeas corpus, it appears to the court or judge that there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed by the prisoner, he shall not be discharged, but shall be committed or admitted to bail.”

Especially is this true in cases such as the present in which there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed by reason of the confession of the accused.

In fixing the amount of bail, the court is required by statute to exercise sound discretion, and among other things, to give due consideration to the financial ability of the accused to give bail. However, as stated by Mr. Branch in his Ann. *143Tex.P.C., p. 144: “The accused should introduce some evidence as to his ability to give bail so that the appellate court, if bail is granted or reduced on appeal, may have some guide as to the amount besides the qharge preferred and the facts proven.”

In the present instance, there is no evidence from any source showing the relator’s financial status or her inability to make bond in the amount fixed by the court. As stated above, her only contention is that she should be discharged because her incarceration in jail would seriously menace her health. Under the circumstances portrayed by the record, she would not be entitled to a reduction in the amount of bail required by the court. See Ex parte McDaniel, 96 Tex.Cr.R. 539, 258 S.W. 1057; Ex parte Howell, Tex.Cr.App., 120 S.W.2d 264; also 5 Tex.Jur. p. 871, sec. 42.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### BOLTON v. STATE.

No. 16261.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 22, 1933.

S. I. Cornett, of Binderi, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Selling intoxicating liquor is the offense; the punishment, confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in' the indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment and sentence are improperly entered, in that they fail to take note of the Indeterminate Sentence Law as set forth in article 775, Code of Criminal Procedure 1925, as amended by Acts 1931, c. 207, § 1 (Vernon’s Ann. C. C. P. art. 775). The judgment and sentence will be reformed in that particular so as to declare that the appellant shall be confined in the penitentiary for a period of not less than one nor more than two years.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined hy the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Star Multi Care Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
Schoenberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report containing the financial statements for the Company fully
          complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.


                                                      By /s/ David Schoenberg
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      David Schoenberg
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          	   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      13,551,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,614,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,995,000
<PP&E>                                       2,534,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 667,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,050,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,991,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,593,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,050,000
<SALES>                                     30,175,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,175,000
<CGS>                                       16,812,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,141,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (220,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                254,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    99,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            155,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   155,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
asbform10q080930_ex10-3.htm


    
      
         


      

      
         

        
          
            

          

        

      

      
         


        Exhibit
10.3

        SECOND
AMENDMENT TO THE CARDIOTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

        EMPLOYEE
STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

         

        
        

      

    

     

    WHEREAS, CardioTech
International, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the CardioTech International, Inc.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, effective as of October 16, 2007, as amended (the
“Plan”);

     

    WHEREAS, in Section 19 of the
Plan, the Company, through its Board of Directors, has reserved the right to
amend the Plan at any time and for any reason; and

     

    WHEREAS, the Company desires
to amend the Plan to increase the maximum number of shares a Plan participant
may purchase during each offering period.

     

    NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is
hereby amended effective as of August 26, 2008, as follows:

     

    
      	
              1.  

            	
              By
      revising Section 7(a) to read as
follows:

            


    

     

    On the
Offering Date of each Offering Period, each eligible Employee participating in
such Offering Period shall be granted an option to purchase on each Purchase
Date a number of Shares of the Company’s Common Stock determined by dividing
such Employee’s Contributions accumulated prior to such Purchase Date and
retained in the Participant’s account as of the Purchase Date by the applicable
Purchase Price; provided, however, that the maximum number of Shares an Employee
may purchase during each Offering Period shall be 23,000 Shares (subject to any
adjustment pursuant to Section 18 below), and provided further that such
purchase shall be subject to the limitations set forth in Sections 3(b) and
12.

     

    
      	
              2.  

            	
              Except
      as provided above, the Plan shall remain in full force and
      effect.

            


    

     

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Company has caused this Second Amendment to the Plan to be executed on this
26th
day of August, 2008.

              


     

    
      	 	 CARDIOTECH
      INTERNATIONAL, INC.
	 	 
	 	 
	
               
      

            	
              By:  /s/ Michael F.
      Adams

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
                    
      On Behalf of Its Board of
Directors
TS-AMID10/20/40

Attachment #5

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 2 

Worker/Occupational Exposure Information on the New Chemical Substances at 

Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter – Manufacture and Processing