alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2292 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil and gas 

preleasing, leasing, and related activities in certain areas of the Outer 

Continental Shelf off the coast of Florida, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2018 

Mr. NELSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit 

oil and gas preleasing, leasing, and related activities in 

certain areas of the Outer Continental Shelf off the 

coast of Florida, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Florida Coastal Protec5 tion Act’’. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2292 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS 

2 PRELEASING, LEASING, AND RELATED AC3 TIVITIES IN CERTAIN AREAS OFF THE COAST 

4 OF FLORIDA. 

5 Section 18 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

6 (43 U.S.C. 1344) is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following: 

8 ‘‘(i) PROHIBITION OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS

9 PRELEASING, LEASING, AND RELATED ACTIVITIES IN

10 CERTAIN AREAS OFF THE COAST OF FLORIDA.— 

11 ‘‘(1) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other 

12 provision of this section or any other law, the Sec13 retary may not offer for oil and gas preleasing or 

14 leasing, or any related activity, any tract located 

15 in— 

16 ‘‘(A) any area of the Eastern Gulf of Mex17 ico that is referred to in section 104(a) of the 

18 Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 

19 (43 U.S.C. 1331 note); 

20 ‘‘(B) the portion of the South Atlantic 

21 Planning Area south of 30 degrees, 43 minutes 

22 North Latitude; or 

23 ‘‘(C) the Straits of Florida Planning Area. 

24 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION ON EFFECT.—Nothing in this 

25 subsection affects any right under any lease issued 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2292 IS

1 under this Act before the date of enactment of this 

2 subsection.’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     UT
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENTS OF INCOME, BALANCE SHEETS AND
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      67,443,361
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    11,006,359
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         12,701,485
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       366,691
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 24,560,769
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,078,665
<COMMON>                                       974,508
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      10,061,276
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            36,199,565
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 46,284,611
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,445,600
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           36,768,767
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             10,879,547
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  1,224,748
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 19,477,392
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  116,078,665
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      23,800,776
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           1,498,937
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     19,179,950
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     20,678,887
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        3,121,889
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             291,824
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 3,413,713
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       1,189,154
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,192,033
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    32,526
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  2,192,033
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       1,145,799
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         5,543,903
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.37
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-107555, 333-101569,333-86595, 333-65721, 333-40697, 333-34677, 33-65412, 33-97512, 33-65414, and 33-88114, of PacificSunwear of California, Inc. on Form S-8 of our reports dated April 4, 2005, relating to thefinancial statements (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatoryparagraph relating to the restatement of the consolidated financial statements as of January 31,2004 and for the years ended January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003) and management’s report on theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form10-K of Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. for the year ended January 29, 2005.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Costa Mesa, California
Exhibit 23.2



|     |  |                                                              |  |                                                                                                                  
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Tel.: +(55) 8503 4200 Fax:
+(55) 8503 4299 www.bdomexico.com |  | Castillo Miranda y Compañía, S.C. Paseo de la Reforma 505-31 Torre Mayor Colonia Cuauhtémoc México, D.F.
CP 06500

Lifetime Brands, Inc.

We hereby consent to incorporate in the 2012 Form 10-K of Lifetime Brands, our report dated February 28, 2013, related to the audit we performed on the consolidated financial statements of Grupo
Vasconia, S.A.B. and subsidiaries for the year ended as of December 31, 2012.



|                           |  |                                                              
|-------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                           |  | CASTILLO MIRANDA Y COMPAÑÌA, S.C.
Member of BDO International
|                           |  | LOGO                                                         
|                           |  | Bernardo Soto Peñafiel, CPA                                  
|Mexico City March 14,
2013 |  |                                                              



LOGO

Castillo Miranda y Compañía, S. C. (BDO Castillo Miranda) es una sociedad civil mexicana de contadores
públicos y consultores de empresas, miembro de BDO International Limited, una compañía del Reino Unido limitada por garantía, y forma parte de la red internacional de firmas independientes de BDO.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                           3,294
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (29,062)
<INVENTORY>                                    126,711
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               225,116
<PP&E>                                          68,851
<DEPRECIATION>                                (32,497)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 287,490
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,010
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           215
<OTHER-SE>                                     189,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   287,490
<SALES>                                        269,821
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               269,821
<CGS>                                          202,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  202,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,915
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (139)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,696)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (11,820)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,876)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,876)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.64)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40187

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MANUEL FELIPE RAMOS-GUTIERREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:05-CR-487-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Manuel Felipe

Ramos-Gutierrez raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

Dear Michael, Jennj Rosencranse Martin. Michael COSD Bob Hooper; Nancy Brown EAS Comments Friday, December 20, 2013 8:32:26 AM

On behalfofthe Cody City Council, please accept ourfull support of the Skywest and United proposal received. Skywest and United have been great partners with Yellowstone Regional Airport and the City of Cody and we are pleased thatthey wish to continuetheir services in Cody. Sincerely, Mayor Nancy Tia Brown and City AdministratorJenni Rosencranse Sentfrom my iPad

*All City of Cody electroniccorrespondence and associated file attachments are public records and may be subject to certain disclosure in the event of a public records request.***----~**
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Carey Institutional Properties Incorporated and Subsidiaries on Form S-3 (File
No. 33-96294) of our report dated March 31, 1998, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Carey
Institutional Properties Incorporated and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995,
1996 and 1997 and for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, which
reports are incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                    /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

New York, New York
April 2, 1998


                                      -42-
Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version 

## Packaged Terminal Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Energy Conservation Standard Final Rule The Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), as amended, provides the Department of Energy (DOE) the authority to establish energy conservation standards for certain commercial equipment covered by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) and the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) Standard 90.1, including packaged terminal air conditioners (PTACs) and packaged terminal heat pumps (PTHPs). (42 U.S.C. 6313(a)(6) (A)) Section 342(a)(6)(A) provides that DOE may prescribe a standard more stringent than the level in ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1, after ASHRAE amends the energy conservation standards found in ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1, if DOE can demonstrate "by clear and convincing evidence," that such a more stringent standard "would result in significant additional conservation of energy and is technologically feasible and economically justif ied." (42 U.S.C. 6313(a)(6)(A)(II)



### Final Rule The U.S. Department of Energy issued a Final Rule on October 7, 2008, which amends the existing energy conservation standards for standard size and non-standard size packaged terminal air conditioners and packaged terminal heat pumps. This regulation is effective November 6, 2008. The EERE Information Center 

### Pa g e 1 of 2

12/1/2008 file://C:\DOCUME~1\m p oston\LOCALS~1\Tem p \1SV6YYKE.htmBuilding Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov Content Last Updated: 10/14/2008 amended energy conservation standards established in the final rule will be applicable starting October 8, 2012 for standard size PTACs and PTHPs. The standards established in the final rule will be applicable starting October 7, 2010 for non-standard size PTACs and PTHPs.

The following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Adobe Reader

.

z Energy Conservation Program for Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Final Rule for Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner and Packaged Terminal Heat Pump Energy Conservation Standards, October 7, 2008. ( PDF 685 KB )

z Final Rule Technical Support Document

z Final Rule Analytical Tools

Printable Version 

### Pa g e 2 of 2

12/1/2008 file://C:\DOCUME~1\m p oston\LOCALS~1\Tem p \1SV6YYKE.htm
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No.'s 333-30083, 333-5769, 33-85914, 33-81894, 333-4806 and 33-52250)
pertaining to the 1991 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1995 Stock Option Plan,
the 1994 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Based Compensation Program, the 1985
Employee Stock Option Plan and the 1991 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1992
Restricted Stock Award Plan, and the 1987 Directors Stock Option Plan of
Genelabs Technologies, Inc. of our report dated February 8, 2001, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Genelabs Technologies, Inc. included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 27, 2001
623 S.E.2d 432

#### Tony Melvin WITCHER v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia.

Record No. 0428-05-3.

Court of Appeals of Virginia, Salem.

Dec. 28, 2005.

*274Gregory T. Casker, for appellant.

Rosemary Bourne, Assistant Attorney General (Judith Williams Jadgmann, Attorney General; Paul C. Galanides, Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Present: BUMGARDNER, FRANK and HUMPHREYS, JJ.

BUMGARDNER, III, Judge.

A grand jury indicted Tony Melvin Witcher on a charge of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. The cocaine was found in his vehicle during a traffic stop. The defendant filed a motion to suppress the cocaine seized during the stop. The trial court denied the motion.

After the Commonwealth rested during the jury trial, the defendant tendered a conditional guilty plea reserving his challenge to the denial of the motion to suppress. The Commonwealth objected to the entry of a conditional plea and *275argued its consent was required for acceptance of a conditional plea, Code § 19.2-254. The defendant and his counsel acknowledged the Commonwealth’s objection and stated they recognized an appeal could be denied for that reason. The trial judge accepted the conditional guilty plea despite the lack of consent by the Commonwealth, found the defendant guilty, and imposed sentence.

The defendant filed a petition for appeal arguing his encounter with the officer was not consensual. In response, the Commonwealth filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because the conditional guilty plea was entered without its consent.

Code § 19.2-254 provides, in part, “With the approval of the court and the consent of the Commonwealth, a defendant may enter a conditional plea of guilty in a felony case, reserving the right, on appeal from the judgment, to a review of the adverse determination of any specified pretrial motion.” The language of the statute is plain and clear. *Volkswagen of America v. Smit,*266 Va. 444, 452, 587 S.E.2d 526, 531 (2003). The defendant may only enter a conditional plea with the consent of the Commonwealth. The defendant and his counsel acknowledged the appeal might be dismissed because the plea lacked the Commonwealth’s consent.

The defendant invited the trial court to err, and the trial court did err in accepting the plea. Accordingly, we grant the Commonwealth’s motion and dismiss the appeal.

*Dismissed.*
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 Company Report
 1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    /S/ STEVEN L. KELLERName:
    Steven L. KellerTitle:  Date:
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2011
STATE OF CONNECTICUt 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

December 15, 2004 

Anne Arnold 

United States Environmental Protection Agency - Region 1 

One Congress Street, Suite 1100 

Boston, MA 02114-2023 

Re: Additional Documents in Support of the 

Revision to the Connecticut State Implementation Plan -- 

Adoption of Connecticut Regulatory Amendments and New Sections; 

Additional Control Measures in Support ofAttainment of the 1-Hour Ozone Standard 

Dear Ms. Arnold : 

Per your request, enclosed are additional documents to support Connecticut's revision to the State 

Implementation Plan dated December 1, 2004. These documents are alternatives to those submitted 

as Attachments D, D-1, D-2 and D-3, which pertain to the amendment of regulations of Connecticut 

State Agencies (R.C.S.A) section 22a-174-30, concerning dispensing of gasoline/Stage 1 and Stage 

11 vapor recovery, and the adoption of R.C.S.A. section 22a-174-43, concerning portable fuel 

container spillage control . Also included are alternative versions of the hearing certifications 

submitted as Attachments A-2 and B-2 . Specifically, the enclosed documents include : 

" Attachment D: A legal sized version of amended R.C .S .A. section 22a-174-30 and new 

section 22a-174-43 including as the last page the certification showing evidence of approval 

by all individuals required by Connecticut's regulatory adoption laws . As indicated in the 

certification, this amendment and adoption became effective on May 10, 2004, the date of 

the submission to the Secretary of State . 

" Attachment D-1 : An additional copy of the notice of public hearing as published in the 

Connecticut Law Journal on November 18, 2003. 

" Attachment D-2: An alternative copy of the hearing certification with actual rather than 

electronic signature. 

" Attachment D-3: An alternative copy of the hearing report with actual rather than electronic 

signature. 

" Attachment A-2: An alternative copy of the hearing certification for the amendment of 

R.C .S .A. sections 22a-174-4 and 22a-174-7 with actual rather than electronic signature. 

" Attachment-B- ' e copy of the hearing certification for the amendment of 

R.C.S . . section 22a-174-18 w th actual rather than electronic signature. 

Please get in touch with me at (860) 424-3416 if you need additional assistance. 

Merrily A. G 

Envi nmental Analyst 2 

Enclosures 

( Printed on Recycled Paper ) 

79 Elm Street " Htrtford, CT 06106-5127 

An Equal Opportunitv Emplo)er
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 177 (Thursday, September 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 74272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20673]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-12091-01-R8]


Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Order on Petition for 
Objection to State Operating Permit for Mountain Coal Company--West Elk 
Mine

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final order on petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed 
an order dated May 24, 2024, granting in part and denying in part a 
petition dated January 30, 2024, from Center for Biological Diversity 
and WildEarth Guardians. The petition requested that the EPA object to 
a Clean Air Act (CAA) operating permit issued by the Colorado 
Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) to Arch Coal, Inc. 
for its West Elk Coal Mine located in Gunnison County, Colorado.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia Witteman, EPA Region 8, 
telephone number: (303) 312-6156, email address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2c5b45585849414d4202465940454d6c495c4d024b435a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80f7e9f4f4e5ede1eeaeeaf5ece9e1c0e5f0e1aee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>. The final order and petition are available 
electronically at: https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/title-v-petition-database.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA received a petition from the Center 
for Biological Diversity and WildEarth Guardians dated January 30, 
2024, requesting that the EPA object to the issuance of operating 
permit no. 20OPGU411, issued by CDPHE to Arch Coal, Inc. in Gunnison 
County Colorado. On December 8, 2023, the EPA Administrator issued an 
order granting in part and denying in part the petition. The order 
itself explains the basis for the EPA's decision.
    Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide that a petitioner 
may request judicial review of those portions of an order that deny 
issues in a petition. Any petition for review shall be filed in the 
United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit no later 
than November 12, 2024.

KC Becker,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2024-20673 Filed 9-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>