ORIGINAL 

CQ 

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

It) ?LHZ . 'j f [I ,.,. ') I I ~·l I ·• ·- ,.) 

~ OFFICE OF HEARINGS ',,' 

N 

~ WASHINGTON, DC 

c 

0 

(/) 

c:: 

G) 

.s:: 

a. IN THE MATTER OF 

.s 

U) 

QUENTON T. BROWN 

"0 

cu 

0 

0::: 

'3 FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1009 

c:: 

·r:: 

a. 

U) 

c:: 

cu TELECONFERENCE HEARING 

"E 

0 

..., BEFORE THE HONORABLE J. E. SULLIVAN 

Q 

CQ 

-- HISTORIC JORDAN SPRINGS 

II) 

~ ·r:: 1160 JORDAN SPRINGS ROAD 

a. 

... ·~·· .. ·· U) 

c:: STEPHENSON, VA 22656 a: .a: cu 

-e . m 0 

:m::lli ..., 

u 

t:os ·r:: 

0 MAY 3, 2012 

:I '1:J .!!l - 8U> :J: 10:03 A.M. 

G) 

-e 

0 

a. 

._ 

0 

(.) 

RECEIVED 

MAY ·8201 

HEARING DOCKI!T 

800.262.8777 www. porters.com 877.837.8313 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#l6818-l 2 

1 APPEARANCES: 

2 

3 HONORABLE J. E. SULLIVAN 

4 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

5 800 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, S.W. 

6 WASHINGTON, DC 20590 

7 ATTENTION: HEARING DOCKET CLERK, AGC-430 

8 WILBUR WRIGHT BUILDING, SUITE 2W1000 

9 

10 ON BEHALF OF THE COMPLAINTANT: 

11 MARK G. CAMACHO, ESQUIRE 

12 OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL COUNCIL, 

13 CENTRAL REGION, ACE-7 

14 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

15 901 LOCUST, ROOM 506 

16 KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64106 

17 PHONE: 816.329.3765 

18 

19 ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT: 

20 QUENTON T. BROWN, Pro Se' 

21 622 W. MILLER STREET 

22 ORLANDO, FL 32805 

23 PHONE: 321.594.8501 

24 

25 
1 

2 

IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#l6818-l 3 

TELECONFERENCE HEARING 

May 3, 2012 

3 JUDGE SULLIVAN: We're on the record in 

4 the matter of Quenton T. Brown. This is Docket Number 

5 FAA-2011-1009. Today is Thursday, May 3rd, 2012 and 

6 the parties have convened for a telephone conference on 

7 the FAA's Amended Motion for Default Judgment. Marc G. 

8 Camacho, the Respondent's ... I'm sorry, the FAA's 

9 Attorney is present by telephone. The Pro Se' 

10 Respondent, Quenton T. Brown, is not present and there 

11 is no explanation for his absence. Prior to going on 

12 the record this morning, Diane Maze, with the Office of 

13 Hearing, convened his telephone call and advised us all 

14 that she had just tried to contact Mr. Brown at his 

15 phone number of record which is 321-594-8501. Mr. 

16 Brown's voicemail came on when she contacted that 

17 number. The voicemail identified Mr. Brown by name. 

18 No one answered the phone. As a result, Ms. Mays left 

19 a detailed message for Mr. Brown advising him that the 

20 telephone conference was convening, and giving him the 

21 Office of Hearing's phone number to contact if he 

22 wanted to participate. 

23 I'll also note that the court records 

24 shows that Mr. Brown was sent, by U.S. mail, an Order 

25 setting telephone conference on April 19, 2012. This 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 4 

1 Order and Notice to Mr. Brown; and all parties, was 

2 mailed by U.S. mail on April 19, 2012. Mr. Brown was 

3 sent this Order both to his Orlando, Florida address, 

4 as well as, his Melbourne, Florida address. Neither 

5 mailing have been returned. 

6 Mr. Camacho, based on the Court Summary 

7 of the information that Ms. Mays gave us, do you have 

8 anything you would like to correct, disagree with or 

9 clarify? 

10 MR. CAMACHO: No. I cannot make any 

11 comments, cause I'm not privy to those particular 

12 actions but ... I. .. but I'm ... familiar with it ... again ... 

13 JUDGE SULLIVAN: I understand, but you 

14 have a right to ... to correct the Court Summary of what 

15 you heard when ... 

16 MR. CAMACHO: I don't care to do that 

17 Judge. I ... I ... I concur with your summary based on 

18 what I hear. 

19 JUDGE SULLIVAN: Okay. I'm not asking 

20 you to concur with the veracity, just whether or not I 

21 have stated, to the best of your knowledge, a ... a 

22 correct summary of what she told us. 

23 MR. CAMACHO: Yes. I do concur with 

24 that. 

25 JUDGE SULLIVAN: Okay. Okay, so lets 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 5 

1 talk then about the ... the questions the Court had, and 

2 in essence, first and foremost, Mr. Brown ... or ... Mr. 

3 Camacho, I had a question about the actual penalty 

4 you're requesting. I've looked through all of your 

5 Pleadings, I've read the Statutory Authority that you 

6 pled in support of the $11,000 amount. My first 

7 question is, do you have any authority to show that 

8 $11,000 is the correct maximum amount under the statute 

9 that you cited? The reason I ask that is because, I 

10 looked at 49USC46301, subsection A5A, both in the 

11 materials that you provided, and independently in my 

12 own research, and the maximum that's sighted in that 

13 statute is $10,000. 

14 MR. CAMACHO: Yes. Since the statute 

15 went into effect, Your Honor, I didn't provide it to 

16 you, and I apologize. We ... this particular statute ... a 

17 subsequent statute came out to adjust for Cost of 

18 Living adjustment, and that particular adjustment, 

19 brought all civil penalties up from the original 

20 to ... to $11,000 versus $10,000. And ... and that's ... 

21 JUDGE SULLIVAN: When did that statute 

22 come into existence? Cause I went onto Lexus Nexus and 

23 I looked at the most current statute they had, and it 

24 showed ... 

25 MR. CAMACHO: Yes Judge. 
1 

2 

IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 6 

JUDGE SULLIVAN: And it showed $10,000. 

MR. CAMACHO: It's $11,000 Judge but 

3 I ... that's a good question and let me get that 

4 information. In 2010, there was a Civil Penalty 

5 Infla ... Inflation Adjustment our office was provided. 

6 Let me think. This is a copy that I have, Federal 

7 Register 2010 revision to the Civil Penalty 

8 Infla ... Inflation Adjustment Tables. It came out in 

9 the Federal Register and adjustments shown. 

10 (WHEREUPON, Counsel is examining the document.) 

11 MR. CAMACHO: I'm looking now as you and 

12 I are talking. 49USC, 46301, providing false 

13 information. Interference with Kevin crewmembers 

14 27,500 adjusted. No, that's a different one. All 

15 right, 49USC, · 46301A5, violation by an individual or 

16 small business concern. 7,000 for violation, 546301A5B 

17 violation by an individual ... 

18 

19 

JUDGE SULLIVAN: Mr. Camacho? 

MR. CAMACHO: $11,000 per violation. 

20 This is what I'm using. Oh, here it is. I apologize, 

21 Your Honor. This is an adjustment specifically that 

22 identifies what we're talking about and it's 11,000 per 

23 violation adjusted 6-15-2006, maximum civil penalty. 

24 So, I ... this was provided as guidance to our office 

25 from our Chief Counsel's office in Washington, D.C. 

PORTING 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#l6818-l 7 

1 But that's ... 

2 JUDGE SULLIVAN: Yes, I'm going to stop 

3 you. I currently have a Lexus Nexus citation from 

4 April 16, 2012 for the statutory citation of under 

5 which this person is being held liable and, I don't 

6 have anything in this that says $11,000. So ... I .. . 

7 MR. CAMACHO: I understand. I ... I ... all 

8 I can tell you Judge is this, this is final rule that 

9 was issued. I can certainly provide you this number. 

10 It was Monday, November 29, 2010, it went into the 

11 Federal Register, it is a final rule, which is an 

12 adjustment to the Civil Penalty Inflation Tables. 

13 Adjustment for Civil ... Adjustment for Inflation. And, 

14 it breaks down the various Civil Penalties according to 

15 statute. Sets it out on the table and identifies the 

16 reasoning behind it. It specifically identifies an 

17 amendment to Part 13 of our regulations and monetary 

18 penalties have been adjusted upwards, and it gives out 

19 the table, and in it, on the left-hand side, identified 

20 under the title, United States Code Citation is, 49USC, 

21 46301A5A, violation by an individual or small business, 

22 et cetera, et cetera. Maximum penalty now $11,000 per 

23 violation adjusted, originally 6-15-2006 so, 

24 that's ... that is what we've used and we've used that 

25 historically since this came out. This 201D adjustment 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 8 

1 basically said that the previous adjustment made in 

2 2006 to 11,000 had not been changed. 

3 JUDGE SULLIVAN: Okay. 

4 MR. CAMACHO: We go back to 2006, this 

5 is the guidance I use. 

6 JUDGE SULLIVAN: Okay. What ... 

7 MR. CAMACHO: And ... and all of the 

8 attorneys in our office do ... use that guidance. Which 

9 is why we use it. 

10 JUDGE SULLIVAN: Okay. I am ... I'm going 

11 to talk now Mr. Camacho and, I want you to listen to 

12 what I ask you, cause, I ... it sounds like we're talking 

13 over each other. What federal regulation are you 

14 referring to at this point? 

15 MR. CAMACHO: Yes. 

16 JUDGE SULLIVAN: You're ... you're 

17 referring me to as having been giving notice to the 

18 Court and to Mr. Brown about this. 

19 MR. CAMACHO: 14CFR, Part 13. 

20 The ... the ... this is the POT regulations that involve in 

21 investigative and enforcement procedures. 

22 JUDGE SULLIVAN: Okay. 

23 MR. CAMACHO: Like their team 

24 specifically ... more specifically, Section 13.305. 

25 JUDGE SULLIVAN: Okay. I'm going to 

cou 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 9 

1 take a look at that. 

2 MR. CAMACHO: Yes, ma'am. And our 

3 practice, obviously, we cite the core statutory 

4 authority and then we provide each of the recipients, 

5 each prospective respondent ... or each respondent, a 

6 copy of ... we provide them a copy of Part 13 that 

7 applies ... that would apply to their ... we send them an 

8 extra in ... the ... as an enclosure when we provide the 

9 initial notice. 

10 JUDGE SULLIVAN: Sure. 

11 MR. CAMACHO: We send a number of 

12 documents and that's part of our attachments that go 

13 with ... cause Laymen don't know and so we give them that 

14 as guidance so that they can look at it, and/or take it 

15 to their attorneys. 

16 JUDGE SULLIVAN: Okay. 

17 MR. CAMACHO: And I would say, Judge, 

18 that with regard to the application of this, to get a 

19 better perspective, this is ... this is a ... a ... a ... we 

20 receive this memo from Washington, we receive guidance 

21 on ... on these type of changes immediately from our 

22 Chief Counsel's office and, they bring us up-to-speed 

23 on this and, so it's applied nationwide. It's not 

24 particularly my decision or my office's decision. It's 

25 the application of guidance received from our national 

COUR~ . . . 

'VfdeogNtphy 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 10 

1 office in Washington and it's applied across the board 

2 to all of our Chief Counsel. All of a regional counsel 

3 offices. 

4 JUDGE SULLIVAN: I understand. 

5 MR. CAMACHO: Okay. In similar manner, 

6 I have a matrix that's provided to us that breaks this 

7 out, separate and apart, from that particular document 

8 which I'm ... what I'm reading to you came from the 

9 Federal Register, specifically. But, I also ... we also 

10 are provided a matrix, an internal working document 

11 that simplifies that in ... in a kind of a working tool 

12 situation so we can have it readily available for us. 

13 JUDGE SULLIVAN: Okay. Thank you. I 

14 have up on my screen, the Amendment to 14CFR13.304. 

15 Thank you very much. 

16 

17 

MR. CAMACHO: You're welcome. 

JUDGE SULLIVAN: For showing that. And 

18 I can see where you got that amount. 

19 MR. CAMACHO: Yes, ma'am. 

20 JUDGE SULLIVAN: My question 

21 then ... and ... and ... and I have no problem of issuing a 

22 Default Judgment today. So, I want to allay any 

23 concerns you have about that. My question then comes 

24 next, with some of the material that you provided. 

25 MR. CAMACHO: Yes. 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 11 

1 JUDGE SULLIVAN: Let me just talk a 

2 little bit about it with you. More to, in a sense of 

3 where you're coming from on behalf of your client. You 

4 had indicated that, in some of these materials 

5 provided, Attachment Number 7. 

6 MR. CAMACHO: Let me look at that real 

7 quick. 

8 (WHEREUPON, Counsel examined Attachment Number 7.) 

9 MR. CAMACHO: Yes. 

10 JUDGE SULLIVAN: Okay. At the bottom of 

11 Attachment Number 7, in the table that shows figure B 

12 as in Boy, hyphen 3, hyphen P, as in Paul. 

13 MR. CAMACHO: Yes. 

14 JUDGE SULLIVAN: Probably passengers. 

15 You have in Number 1, interference with crew member. 

16 Which is the ... the section that essentially Mr. Brown 

17 was cited? And that shows maximum, with no particular 

18 amount indicated. Directly below that, in paragraph 

19 number two, it talks about an actual, physical assault 

20 of a flight or crew member, and then it gives the 

21 citation. Below that, it talks about physical of 

22 assault of an individual, other than a crew member. 

23 Below that, in paragraph four, a threat to physically 

24 assault, and so forth. And, as you ... as you walk 

25 yourself down that table, the amount of money for 

co:uRt: EPOiRTING 

VfdlfOgNtphg · Utlgallon 1:1chnology 'N 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 12 

1 recommended civil penalty decreases. So, for example, 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

the maximum amount for actually assaulting someone 

would be a $8,000 recommended penalty. The maximum 

amount for assaulting someone other than a crew member, 

is $5,000, an so forth. So, in your material, you've 

requested the maximum of $11,000 for Mr. Brown, 

and ... and I'm ... I ... as I read through the material ... 

MR. CAMACHO: Shhh. 

JUDGE SULLIVAN: Provided to me, I found 

10 it somewhat inconsistent with the facts, the form. I'm 

11 just noting that for you because I ... I saw this ... this 

12 recommended penalty came from the field office, 

13 and ... and I'm ... I'm a little concerned that the field 

14 folks may not be completely aware of what ... what 

15 your ... you have before you, since the fact in this 

16 case, is that Mr. Brown threw a bag of peanuts at one 

17 of the flight attendants. And, then of course, was 

18 profane and ... and disrespectful towards that crew 

19 member, upon confrontation. Obviously, you and I 

20 have ... we've discussed before both have criminal 

21 litigation backgrounds, and I have no problem finding 

22 that throwing a ... anything at a crew member is an 

23 assault. But, I ... I just want to alert you to the fact 

24 that in a case like this, if it went to trial, to see 

25 generally an assault, physical assault, where someone 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 13 

1 could punch someone in the face, treated as an $8,000 

2 maximum, but a bag of peanuts, rise to the level of 

3 $11,000, somewhat inconsistent. Does that ... does that 

4 make sense as I'm talking to you about this? 

5 MR. CAMACHO: I would ... I 

6 would ... on ... on the face of it, it ... it ... obviously, 

7 my ... my response is yes. On the face of it, it makes 

8 perfect sense. 

9 

10 

JUDGE SULLIVAN: Okay. 

MR. CAMACHO: If I can, I'd like to be 

11 heard for the record. 

12 JUDGE SULLIVAN: No, I will 

13 just ... I ... I'm just going to leave that for you. I 

14 have no trouble granting your motion for an $11,000 

15 default judgment at this point. 

16 MR. CAMACHO: I want to point something 

17 out to you because I think it's important; if you would 

18 allow me the courtesy of doing that. 

19 JUDGE SULLIVAN: I would be happy to 

20 once I finish talking. 

21 

22 

MR. CAMACHO: Okay Judge. 

JUDGE SULLIVAN: Okay. I'm saying I'm 

23 happy to grant you an $11,000 default judgment in this 

24 case because, you have provided me with the statute 

25 that I needed to see, regarding the increased penalty, 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 14 

1 and I thank you for that. Number two, you provided 

2 full and fair notice to Mr. Brown regarding what he 

3 could expect to see if he failed to pursue this 

4 litigation. And number three, I think the record is 

5 replete with opportunities for Mr. Brown to come and 

6 defend himself. Not only against the alleged 

7 violation, the facts underlying the alleged violation, 

8 but also, against the request for the maximum amount. 

9 And you have a right to the maximum amount in this 

10 case. So, but your welcome to address the Court 

11 comments regarding what I saw as generally inconsistent 

12 in materials that you provided to me. 

13 MR. CAMACHO: Thank you Judge. There 

14 are two different statutes that are actually 

15 used ... up ... there are two statutes available to the 

16 agency that ... that can be used, and it is our policy 

17 to, and we have consistently used, 49USC46301, subpart 

18 A5largeA as the statutory basis for taking civil 

19 penalty action. And ... and that is the one that's 

20 referenced through regulations in the first of those, 

21 one, two, three, four, five subparts and, the sanction 

22 will be ... it's a sanction guidance table. The other 

23 one that's available to us, and it's actually titled 

24 49, Section 46318 ... 

25 JUDGE SULLIVAN: All right, now I ... 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 15 

1 MR. CAMACHO: That once specifically 

2 references interference but, we do not use that 

3 and ... and I'm not sure why. However, that is the case 

4 that we ... but it is there, because under that statute, 

5 those dollar amounts are there and they're broken out 

6 that way. So, we have relied consistently on the other 

7 one ... the first one. The second ... and with regard to 

8 that, if you will see, clearly, I'm not in a position, 

9 or anyone similarly positions in ... in my position, is 

10 an ... is able to authorize, or could ethically just 

11 select a number arbitrarily, so, we have to rely 

12 heavily on this guidance. When ... in keeping with that, 

13 I provided you, if you'll recall, Attachment-3, 4 and 5 

14 to show you how the agency in it's internal guidance, 

15 gives guidance to the Regional Counsel's office on how 

16 to look at where to go with regard to certain 

17 violations and, because it's a convoluted process. 

18 And ... and in that, you'll ... you can see an attachment 

19 for other individuals not serving capacities varmint 

20 for violations covered under 49USC, Section 46301A5A, 

21 maximum and then the $11,000. That's how those two are 

22 linked which is consiBtent with the statutory language 

23 that I gave you. However, so ... so that is ... and it's a 

24 matter of our practice, and so ... although that other 

25 statute is available, I'm not at an occasion to use it . 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 16 

1 I do not know ... we are not trained to that. I've been 

2 trained to this particular statute, in terms of the 

3 implementation of it for this particular situation. 

4 

5 

JUDGE SULLIVAN: No, I appreciate ... 

MR. CAMACHO: And also, I would say 

6 that ... and I just wanted ... because you may see this 

7 again in your practice. Other attorneys may provide 

S this to you, particularly, Exhibit, or much 

9 specifically, Exhibit-S ... or Attachment-S. The 

10 internal processing of civil penalty actions, and all 

11 enforcement actions, takes a three step ... three 

12 step ... I guess it ... it involves three steps. First, 

13 the Field Office provides the facts and the renders 

14 that ... it ... it's findings. It then comes to where we 

15 are today in Kansas City, the Regional Headquarters 

16 Office Building. And, that line of business, at this 

17 level, then reviews that ... that file and looks for 

1S consistency with regard to our written policy, which is 

19 promulgated to the members of the public and then, 

20 makes an ess ... evaluation and an assessment and they 

21 are ... that office is responsible for providing the 

22 recommendation that you see in Attachment-S, and then 

23 it comes to me. Policy wise, legal counsel makes the 

24 final determination. We can concur and not concur. I 

25 always like to put little concurs ... or non-concurrence 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 17 

1 notes on these to ... in the event the truck should hit 

2 me tomorrow, someone can come back and look at it and 

3 see what my decision was, and, that's what I have here. 

4 So, this is a ... this is the last hurrah for the line of 

5 business. In other words, this is actually 

6 accomplished here at the Regional Headquarters by 

7 specialists who are trained to do this kind of 

8 analysis, if you were, and then they provide these ... I 

9 call it ... they call it supporting reasons, but they're 

10 analysis. And ... and ... and this is somewhat ... this 

11 particular type of evaluation is consistently applied 

12 across the board for all the cases for all the 

13 attorneys in all the regional offices, for which there 

14 are nine, and the two centers at our nation, of which 

15 there are two. So, and I just provide that to you 

16 that there's a better understanding of that process 

17 how ... I use that as an initial analys ... an initial 

18 starting point to see whether their evaluation or 

19 analysis is accurate, it's on the money or, whether 

20 it's skewed. But, I can use my own judgment in the 

21 matter and move forward from there, based on my 

so 

and 

22 understanding of how we have applied policies and the 

23 statutes in the past. That's how I derived to that 

24 particular dollar amount. 

25 JUDGE SULLIVAN: Thank you for that 

NG 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 18 

1 explanation. I'm ... I'm just trying to alert you to the 

2 fact that I found this somewhat inconsistent. 

3 MR. CAMACHO: Okay. 

4 JUDGE SULLIVAN: And I think that you 

5 heard me say that. 

6 MR. CAMACHO: Yes, I did. Thank you. 

7 JUDGE SULLIVAN: I ... I understand what 

8 you've said that you're following long-standing policy, 

9 that ... that it's applied throughout the nation by your 

10 office and other field administrative offices. I'm ... I 

11 have no ... no doubt that you do that, and that you do 

12 that with very best intent. I'm just saying that, for 

13 the future, it would seem to me to be somewhat 

14 inconsistent to have a policy of a maximum of $8,000 

15 for punching somebody, but a maximum of $11,000 for 

16 throwing a bag of peanuts. That doesn't make a great 

17 deal of sense to me but, on a default judgment motion, 

18 you have pled your case well Sir, and you have provided 

19 all the facts that I think you needed to ... to justify 

20 the $11,000 maximum penalty, and I'm happy to grant it 

21 to you. 

22 MR. CAMACHO: Thank you Judge. 

23 JUDGE SULLIVAN: You're welcome. 

24 Is ... and I will be issuing an Order today on that. 

25 And, I want to thank you very much for the many times 

EPORTING 

:tJtlgatlon Tlc:Jhnclogy 1M 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 19 

1 that you've appeared by yourself, in this case and 

2 assisted The Court so ably. 

3 

4 

MR. CAMACHO: Thank you Judge. 

JUDGE SULLIVAN: Is there anything else 

5 that you would like to add to your record on behalf of 

6 your client today before we close? 

7 MR. CAMACHO: No ... no, Judge. Off the 

8 record, if I could talk to you about a ... a ... it's 

9 something else that relates ... not directly to this 

10 case, but more than anything else, I think I'd just 

11 like to get an insight from you for future possible 

12 cases. If we can, if we could do that off the record. 

13 JUDGE SULLIVAN: As long as we're 

14 talking hypothetically, on a general basis, I could do 

15 that. Are you ... 

16 MR. CAMACHO: Okay. Yes. I can do 

17 that. One of the ... I'm sorry ... all right ... all right. 

18 Tell me when you're ready. I apologize again. 

19 JUDGE SULLIVAN: Mr. Court Reporter, it 

20 appears our business is complete. I'm going to thank 

21 everybody for their time. We can go off the record at 

22 this time. 

23 (WHEREUPON, the Hearing of Quenton T. Brown was 

2 4 concluded at 10 : 2 8 a.m. ) 

25 
1 

2 

IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#l6818-1 20 

CAPTION 

3 The Hearing in the matter, on the date, and at the time 

4 and place set out on the title page hereof. 

5 

6 It was requested that the Hearing be taken by the 

7 reporter and that same be reduced to typewritten form. 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

..... .. ...... ____________________ __ 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 21 

CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER 

1 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA AT LARGE: 

2 

3 I hereby certify that I am a Notary Public for 

4 the State of Virginia at Large, and hereby certify 

5 that the foregoing constitutes a true and accurate 

6 transcript to the best of their ability. 

7 

8 Further, this is to certify that I am not an 

9 employee of nor related to any of the parties, and I 

10 

have no financial interest in the outcome of this 

11 

matter. 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 JACOB MACE 

COURT REPORTER / NOTARY 

18 

NOTARY REGISTRATION NUMBER: 7508361 

19 My Commission Expires: September 30, 2015 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#l6818-l 22 

$ 

$10,000 5:13 5:20 

6:1 

$11,000 5:6 5:8 

5:20 6:2 6:19 

7:6 7:22 12:6 

13:3 13:14 13:23 

15:21 18:15 

18:20 

$5,000 12:5 

$8,000 12:3 

13:1 18:14 

1 

1 11:15 

10:28 19:24 

11,000 6:22 8:2 

13 7:17 8:19 9:6 

13.305 8:24 

14CFR 8:19 

14CFR13.304 10:14 

16 7:4 

19 3:25 4:2 

2 

2006 8:2 8:4 

2010 6:4 6:7 

7:25 

2012 3:2 3:5 

4:2 7:4 

27,500 6:14 

29 7:10 

3 

3 3:2 11:12 

7:10 

3:25 

321-594-8501 3:15 

3rd 3:5 

4 

4 15:13 

46301 6:12 

46301A5 6:15 

46301A5A 7:21 

15:20 

46318 14:24 

49 14:24 

49USC 6:12 6:15 

7:20 15:20 

49USC46301 5:10 

14:17 

5 

5 15:13 

546301A5B 6:16 

6 

6-15-2006 6:23 

7:23 

7 

7 11:5 11:8 11:11 

7,000 6:16 

A 

a ... a 4:21 

a ... a ... a ... we 

9:19 

a ... a ... it's 19:8 

a ... anything 

12:22 

a ... this 17:4 

COURT: 

'Vlct•oor.aphg Utlaa•aora T.'ldlrrtolqy m 

a.m 19:24 

A5A 5:10 

A5largeA 14:18 

able 15:10 

ably 19:2 

absence 3:11 

accomplished 17:6 

according 7:14 

accurate 17:19 

across 10:1 17:12 

action 14:19 

actions 4:12 

16:10 16:11 

actual 5:3 11:19 

actually 12:2 

14:14 14:23 17:5 

add 19:5 

address 4:3 4:4 

14:10 

adjust 5:17 

adjusted 6:14 

6:23 7:18 7:23 

adjustment 5:18 

5:18 6:5 6:8 

6:21 7:12 7:13 

7:25 8:1 

adjustments 6:9 

administrative 

18:10 

advised 3:13 

advising 3:19 

against 14:6 14:8 

agency 14:16 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 23 

15:14 

alert 12:23 18:1 

allay 10:22 

alleged 14:6 14:7 

allow 13:18 

also ... we 1 0 : 9 

am .. ~I'm 8:10 

Amended 3:7 

amendment 7:17 

10:14 

amount 5:6 5:8 

10:18 11:18 

11:25 12:2 

12:4 14:8 14:9 

17:24 

amounts 15:5 

an ... is 15: 10 

analys ... an 17:17 

analysis 17:8 

17:10 17:19 

and . .. and 5 : 2 0 

8:7 12:7 12:13 

12:18 14:19 15:3 

15:18 

And . .. and . .. and 

17:10 

and/or 9:14 

answered 3:18 

anyone 15:9 

anything 4:8 

7:6 19:4 19:10 

apart 10:7 

apologize 5:16 

6:20 19:18 

appeared 19:1 

appears 19:20 

application 

9:18 9:25 

applied 9:23 10:1 

17:11 17:22 18:9 

applies ... that 

9:7 

apply 9:7 

appreciate 16:4 

April 3: 2 5 4 : 2 

7:4 

arbitrarily 15:11 

are ... that 16:21 

assault 11:19 

11:22 11:24 

12:23 12:25 

12:25 

assaulting 12:2 

12:4 

assessment 16:20 

assisted 19:2 

attachment 11:5 

11:8 11:11 15:18 

Attachment-3 

15:13 

Attachment-S 16:9 

16:22 

attachments 9:12 

attendants 12:17 

Attorney 3 : 9 

attorneys 8:8 

9:15 16:7 17:13 

authority 5:5 5:7 

COURt 

·vtaeogr:.phy ' 

9:4 

authorize 15:10 

available 10:12 

14:15 14:23 

15:25 

aware 12:14 

B 

backgrounds 12:21 

bag 12:16 13:2 

18:16 

based 4:6 4:17 

17:21 

basically 8:1 

basis 14:18 19:14 

be ... it's 14:22 

behalf 11:3 19:5 

behind 7:16 

best 4:21 18:12 

better 9:19 17:16 

bit 11:2 

board 10:1 17:12 

bottom 11:10 

Boy 11:12 

breaks 7:14 10:6 

bring 9:22 

broken 15:5 

brought 5:19 

Brown 3 : 4 3 : 1 0 

3:14 3:17 3:19 

3:24 4:1 4:2 

8:18 11:16 

12:6 12:16 

14:2 14:5 19:23 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 24 

Brown . .. or . .. Mr 

5:2 

Brown's 3:16 

Building 16:16 

business 6:16 

7:21 16:16 

17:5 19:20 

but ... I .. . but 

4:12 

c 

Camacho 3 : 8 4 : 6 

4:10 4:16 4:23 

5:3 5:14 5:25 

6:2 6:11 6:18 

6:19 7:7 8:4 8:7 

8:11 8:15 8:19 

8:23 9:2 9:11 

9:17 10:5 

10:16 10:19 

10:25 11:6 

11:9 11:13 

12:8 13:5 

13:10 13:16 

13:21 14:13 15:1 

16:5 18:3 18:6 

18:22 19:3 

19:7 19:16 

capacities 15:19 

care 4:16 

case 12:16 

12:24 13:24 

14:10 15:3 18:18 

19:1 19:10 

cases 17:12 19:12 

cause 4:11 5:22 

8:12 

centers 17:14 

certain 15:16 

certainly 7:9 

cetera 7:22 7:22 

changed 8:2 

changes 9:21 

Chief 6:25 9:22 

10:2 

citation 7:3 

7:4 7:20 11:21 

cite 9:3 

cited 5:9 11:17 

City 16:15 

civil 5:19 6:4 

6:7 6:23 7:12 

7:14 12:1 

14:18 16:10 

Civil ... 

Adjustment 7:13 

clarify 4:9 

clearly 15:8 

client 11:3 19:6 

close 19:6 

Code 7:20 

comes 10:23 16:14 

16:23 

coming 11:3 

comments 4:11 

14:11 

complete 19:20 

completely 12:14 

concern 6:16 

concerned 12:13 

concerns 10:23 

NG 

concluded 19:24 

concur 4:17 

4:20 4:23 

16:24 16:24 

concurs ... or 

16:25 

conference 3 : 6 

3:20 3:25 

confrontation 

12:19 

consistency 16:18 

consistent 15:22 

consistently 

14:17 15:6 17:11 

contact 3:14 3:21 

contacted 3:16 

convened 3:6 3:13 

convening 3:20 

convoluted 15:17 

copy 6:6 9:6 9:6 

core 9:3 

correct 4:8 

4:14 4:22 5:8 

Cost 5:17 

counsel 6:10 10:2 

10:2 11:8 16:23 

Counsel's 6:25 

9:22 15:15 

course 12:17 

court 3:23 4:6 

4:14 5:1 8:18 

14:10 19:2 19:19 

courtesy 13:18 

covered 15:20 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#l6818-l 25 

crew 11:15 

11:20 11:22 12:4 

12:18 12:22 

crewmembers 6:13 

criminal 12:20 

current 5:23 

currently 7:3 

D 

D.C 6:25 

deal 18:17 

decision 9:24 

9:24 17:3 

decreases 12:1 

default 3:7 10:22 

13:15 13:23 

18:17 

defend 14:6 

derived 17:23 

detailed 3:19 

determination 

16:24 

Diane 3:12 

different 6:14 

14:14 

directly 11:18 

19:9 

disagree 4:8 

discussed 12:20 

disrespectful 

12:18 

do ... use 8:8 

Docket 3:4 

document 6:10 

10:7 10:10 

documents 9:12 

dollar 15:5 17:24 

doubt 18:11 

E 

effect 5:15 

else 19:4 19:9 

19:10 

enclosure 9 : 8 

enforcement 

8:21 16:11 

ess ... 

evaluation 16:20 

essence 5:2 

essentially 11:16 

et 7:22 7:22 

ethically 15:10 

evaluation 

17:11 17:18 

event 17:1 

everybody 19:21 

examined 11:8 

examining 6:10 

example 12:1 

Exhibit 16:8 

Exhibit-S ... or 

16:9 

existence 5:22 

expect 14:3 

explanation 

3:11 18:1 

extra 9:8 

F 

FAA-2011-1009 3:5 

FAA's 3:7 3:8 

face 13:1 13:6 

13:7 

fact 12:15 

12:23 18:2 

facts 12:10 

14:7 16:13 18:19 

failed 14:3 

fair 14:2 

false 6:12 

federal 6 : 6 6 : 9 

7:11 8:13 10:9 

field 12:12 12:13 

16:13 18:10 

figure 11:11 

file 16:17 

final 7:8 7:11 

16:24 

finding 12:21 

findings 16:14 

finish 13:20 

first 5:2 5:6 

14:20 15:7 16:12 

five 14:21 

flight 11:20 

12:17 

Florida 4:3 4:4 

folks 12:14 

foremost 5:2 

form 12:10 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 26 

forth 11:24 12:5 

forward 17:21 

full 14:2 

future 18:13 

19:11 

G 

general 19:14 

generally 12:25 

14:11 

gives 7:18 

11:20 15:15 

giving 3:20 8:17 

grant 13:23 18:20 

granting 13:14 

great 18:16 

guess 16:12 

guidance 6:24 8:5 

8:8 9:14 9:20 

9:25 14:22 15:12 

15:14 15:15 

H 

happy 13:19 13:23 

18:20 

have ... we've 

12:20 

having 8:17 

Headquarters 

16:15 17:6 

hear 4:18 

heard 4:15 

13:11 18:5 

Hearing 3:1 

3:13 19:23 

Hearing's 3:21 

heavily 15:12 

held 7:5 

historically 7:25 

hit 17:1 

Honor 5:15 6:21 

how ... I 17: 17 

hurrah 17:4 

hyphen 11:12 

11:12 

hypothetically 

19:14 

I 

I ... I 12:11 12:23 

18:7 

I ... I ... all 7:7 

I ... I ... I 4:17 

I ... it 8:12 

I ... that ' s 6 : 3 

I ... this 6:24 

I'd 13:10 19:10 

identified 3:17 

7:19 

identifies 6:22 

7:15 7:16 

I'll 3:23 

I'm 4:11 4:19 

6:11 6:20 7:2 

8:25 10:8 

12:10 13:4 13:22 

13:22 15:3 

15:8 15:25 18:12 

18:20 19:20 

I'm ... familiar 

4:12 

I'm ... I 18:10 

I 'm. . . I . . ; as 12 : 7 

I'm ... I'm 12:13 

18:1 

I 'm . .. what 1 0 : 8 

immediately 9:21 

implementation 

16:3 

important 13:17 

in ... in 10:11 

15:9 

in ... the ... as 9:8 

inconsistent 

12:10 13:3 14:11 

18:2 18:14 

increased 13:25 

independently 

5:11 

indicated 11:4 

11:18 

individual 6:15 

6:17 7:21 11:22 

individuals 15:19 

Infla ... Inflation 

6:5 6:8 

Inflation 7:12 

7:13 

information 4:7 

6:4 6:13 

initial 9:9 17:17 

17:17 

insight 19:11 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 27 

intent 18:12 

interference 6:13 

11:15 15:2 

internal 10:10 

15:14 16:10 

investigative 

8:21 

involve 8:20 

involves 16:12 

is ... and 15 : 2 3 

18:24 

is . .. this 9: 19 

issued 7:9 

issuing 10:21 

18:24 

it ... again 4:12 

it ... it 16:12 

it ... it ... 

obviously 13:6 

it . .. they 1 7 : 9 

it's 6:2 6:22 

9:23 9:23 9:24 

10:1 13:17 14:23 

15:14 15:17 

15:23 17:19 

17:20 18:9 

I've 5:4 5:5 16:1 

J 

Judge 3 : 3 4 : 13 

4:17 4:19 4:25 

5:21 5:25 6:1 

6:2 6:18 7:2 7:8 

8:3 8:6 8:10 

8:16 8:22 8:25 

9:10 9:16 9:17 

10:4 10:13 10:17 

10:20 11:1 11:10 

11:14 12:9 

13:9 13:12 13:19 

13:21 13:22 

14:13 14:25 16:4 

17:25 18:4 

18:7 18:22 18:23 

19:3 19:4 19:7 

19:13 19:19 

judgment 3:7 

10:22 13:15 

13:23 17:20 

18:17 

just .. . I ... I'm 

13:13 

justify 18:19 

K 

Kansas 16:15 

Kevin 6:13 

know . .. we 1 6 : 1 

knowledge 4:21 

L 

language 15:22 

last 17:4 

Laymen 9:13 

leave 13:13 

left-hand 7:19 

legal 16:23 

lets 4:25 

level 13:2 16:17 

Lexus 5:22 7:3 

liable 7:5 

line 16:16 17:4 

linked 15:22 

listen 8:11 

litigation 

12:21 14:4 

little 11:2 12:13 

16:25 

Living 5:18 

long 19:13 

long-standing 

18:8 

M 

ma'am 9:2 10:19 

mail 3:24 4:2 

mailed 4:2 

mailing 4:5 

manner 10:5 

Marc 3:7 

material 10:24 

12:5 12:7 

materials 5:11 

11:4 14:12 

matrix 10:6 10:10 

matter 3:4 

15:24 17:21 

maximum 5:8 

5:12 6:23 7:22 

11:17 12:2 

12:3 12:6 13:2 

14:8 14:9 

15:21 18:14 

18:15 18:20 

may 3:2 3:5 12:14 

16:6 16:7 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#l6818-1 28 

Mays 3:18 4:7 

Maze 3:12 

Melbourne 4:4 

member 11:15 

11:20 11:22 12:4 

12:19 12:22 

members 16:19 

memo 9:20 

message 3:19 

Monday 7:10 

monetary 7:17 

money 11:25 17:19 

morning 3:12 

motion 3:7 

13:14 18:17 

move 17:21 

my ... my 13:7 

N 

nation 17:14 18:9 

national 9:25 

nationwide 9: 2 3 

Neither 4:4 

Nexus 5 : 2 2 7 : 3 

nine 17:14 

no . .. no 18: 11 

19:7 

non-concurrence 

16:25 

note 3:23 

notes 17:1 

notice 4:1 8:17 

9:9 14:2 

noting 12:11 

November 7:10 

0 

obviously 9:3 

12:19 

occasion 15:25 

of ... we 9:6 

office 3:12 

3:21 6:5 6:24 

6:25 8:8 9:22 

10:1 12:12 15:15 

16:13 16:16 

16:21 18:10 

offices 10:3 

17:13 18:10 

office's 9:24 

Oh 6:20 

Okay 4:19 4:25 

4:25 8:3 8:6 

8:10 8:22 8:25 

9:16 10:5 

10:13 11:10 13:9 

13:21 13:22 18:3 

19:16 

on ... on 9:21 

one . . . the 15 : 7 

onto 5:22 

opportunities 

14:5 

Order 3:24 4:1 

4:3 18:24 

original 5:19 

originally 7:23 

Orlando 4:3 

p 

paragraph 11:18 

11:23 

participate 3:22 

particular 4:11 

5:16 5:18 10:7 

11:17 16:2 

16:3 17:11 17:24 

particularly 9:24 

16:8 

parties 3:6 4:1 

passengers 11:14 

past 17:23 

Paul 11:12 

peanuts 12:16 

13:2 18:16 

penalties 5:19 

7:14 7:18 

penalty 5 : 3 6 : 4 

6:7 6:23 7:12 

7:22 12:1 12:3 

12:12 13:25 

14:19 16:10 

18:20 

per 6:19 6:22 

7:22 

perfect 13:8 

person 7:5 

perspective 9:19 

phone 3:15 3:18 

3:21 

physical 11:19 

11:21 12:25 

physically 11:23 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#l6818-l 29 

Pleadings 5:5 

pled 5:6 18:18 

point 8:14 

13:15 13:16 

17:18 

policies 17:22 

policy 14:16 

16:18 16:23 18:8 

18:14 

position 15:8 

15:9 

positions 15:9 

possible 19:11 

POT 8:20 

practice 9 : 3 

15:24 16:7 

present 3:9 3:10 

previous 8:1 

Prior 3:11 

privy 4:11 

Pro 3:9 

Probably 11:14 

problem 10:21 

12:21 

procedures 8:21 

process 15:17 

17:16 

processing 16:10 

profane 12:18 

promulgated 16:19 

prospective 9 : 5 

provide 5:15 

7:9 9:4 9:6 

9:8 16:7 17:8 

17:15 

provided 5:11 6:5 

6:24 10:6 

10:10 10:24 11:5 

12:9 13:24 

14:1 14:12 15:13 

18:18 

provides 16:13 

providing 6:12 

16:21 

public 16:19 

punch 13:1 

punching 18:15 

pursue 14:3 

Q 

Quenton 3:4 

3:10 19:23 

question 5:3 

5:7 6:3 10:20 

10:23 

questions 5:1 

quick 11:7 

R 

readily 10:12 

reading 10:8 

ready 19:18 

real 11:6 

reason 5:9 

reasoning 7:16 

reasons 17:9 

recall 15:13 

receive 9:20 9:20 

received 9:25 

recipients 9:4 

recommendation 

16:22 

recommended 

12:1 12:3 12:12 

record 3:3 3:12 

3:15 13:11 

14:4 19:5 19:8 

19:12 19:21 

records 3:23 

referenced 14:20 

references 15:2 

referring 8:14 

8:17 

regard 9:18 

15:7 15:16 16:18 

regarding 13:25 

14:2 14:11 

regional 10:2 

15:15 16:15 17:6 

17:13 

Register 6: 7 

6:9 7:11 10:9 

regulation 8:13 

regulations 

7:17 8:20 14:20 

relates ... not 

19:9 

relied 15:6 

rely 15:11 

renders 16:13 

replete 14 : 5 

Reporter 19:19 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 30 

request 14:8 

requested 12:6 

requesting 5:4 

research 5:12 

respondent 3:10 

9:5 

respondent . .. or 

9:5 

Respondent' s ... 

I'm 3:8 

response 13:7 

responsible 16:21 

result 3:18 

returned 4:5 

reviews 16:17 

revision 6:7 

right ... all 19:17 

rise 13:2 

rule 7:8 7:11 

s 

sanction 14:21 

14:22 

saw 12:11 14:11 

screen 10:14 

Se 3:9 

second ... and 15:7 

section 8:24 

11:16 14:24 

15:20 

seem 18:13 

select 15:11 

send 9:7 9:11 

sense 11:2 13:4 

13:8 18:17 

sent 3:24 4:3 

separate 10:7 

serving 15:19 

Sets 7:15 

setting 3:25 

Shhh 12:8 

showed 5:24 6:1 

showing 10:17 

shown 6:9 

shows 3:24 

11:11 11:17 

sighted 5:12 

similar 10:5 

similarly 15:9 

simplifies 10:11 

Sir 18:18 

situation 10:12 

16:3 

skewed 17:20 

small 6:16 7:21 

so ... although 

15:24 

So . .. I 7: 6 

so ... so 15:23 

somebody 18:15 

someone 12:2 12:4 

12:25 13:1 17:2 

somewhat 12:10 

13:3 18:2 18:13 

somewhat ... this 

17:10 

sorry 3:8 

sorry ... all 19:17 

sounds 8:12 

specialists 17:7 

specifically 6:21 

7:16 8:24 10:9 

15:1 16:9 

specifically . .. 

more 8:24 

starting 17:18 

stated 4:21 

States 7:20 

statute 5:8 

5:13 5:14 5:17 

5:21 5:23 7:15 

13:24 15:4 15:25 

16:2 

statute ... a 5:16 

statutes 14:14 

14:15 17:23 

statutory 5:5 7:4 

9:3 14:18 15:22 

step . . . I 1 6 : 12 

step ... three 

16:11 

steps 16:12 

stop 7:2 

subpart 14:17 

subparts 14:21 

subsection 5:10 

subsequent 5:17 

SULLIVAN 3:3 4:13 

4:19 4:25 5:21 

6:1 6:18 7:2 8:3 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#16818-1 31 

8:6 8:10 8:16 

8:22 8:25 9:10 

9:16 10:4 

10:13 10:17 

10:20 11:1 11:10 

11:14 12:9 

13:9 13:12 13:19 

13:22 14:25 16:4 

17:25 18:4 

18:7 18:23 

19:4 19:13 19:19 

summary 4:6 

4:14 4:17 4:22 

support 5:6 

supporting 17:9 

sure 9:10 15:3 

T 

table 7 : 15 7 : 1 9 

11:11 11:25 

14:22 

Tables 6:8 7:12 

taking 14:18 

talk 5:1 8:11 

11:1 19:8 

talking 6:12 6:22 

8:12 13:4 

13:20 19:14 

talks 11:19 11:21 

team 8:23 

TELECONFERENCE 

3:1 

telephone 3:6 3:9 

3:13 3:20 3:25 

terms 16:2 

thank 10:13 10:15 

14:1 14:13 17:25 

18:6 18:22 18:25 

19:3 19:20 

that ... and 16:6 

that ... does 13:3 

that ... it ... 

it's 16:14 

that ... that 14:16 

16:17 18:9 

that's 5:12 

5:20 6:14 7:1 

9:12 10:6 

14:19 14:23 

15:21 17:3 17:23 

that's ... that 

7:24 

the ... I 'm 1 9 : 1 7 

the ... the 5:1 

11:16 

The ... the ... 

this 8:20 

their ... we 9 : 7 

then ... and ... 

and . .. and 10:21 

there's 17:16 

these . .. I 17:8 

they're 15:5 17:9 

this ... this 12:11 

threat 11:23 

threw 12:16 

throughout 18:9 

throwing 12:22 

18:16 

Thursday 3:5 

title 7:20 

titled 14:23 

to . .. in 17:1 

to ... to 4:14 5:20 

18:19 

today 3:5 10:22 

16:15 18:24 19:6 

tomorrow 17:2 

tool 10:11 

towards 12:18 

trained 16:1 16:2 

17:7 

treated 13:1 

trial 12:24 

tried 3:14 

trouble 13:14 

truck 17:1 

trying 18:1 

type 9:21 17:11 

u 

u.s 3:24 4:2 

underlying 14:7 

understand 4:13 

7:7 10:4 18:7 

understanding 

17:16 17:22 

United 7:20 

upon 12:19 

up-to-speed 9:22 

upwards 7:18 

used . .. up . .. there 

14:15 

v 
IN THE MATTER OF QUENTON T. BROWN 05/03/2012 CCR#l6818-l 32 

various 7:14 

varmint 15:19 

veracity 4:20 

versus 5:20 

violation 6:15 

6:16 6:17 6:19 

6:23 7:21 7:23 

14:7 14:7 

violations 

15:17 15:20 

voicemail 3:16 

3:17 

w 

walk 11:24 

Washington 6 : 2 5 

9:20 10:1 

we ... but 15:4 

We . .. this 5: 16 

welcome 10:16 

14:10 18:23 

we're 3:3 6:22 

8:12 19:13 

we've 7:24 7:24 

what ... what 12:14 

When ... in 15 : 12 

WHEREUPON 6:10 

11:8 19:23 

whether 4:20 

17:18 17:19 

wise 16:23 

with ... cause 9:13 

working 10:10 

10:11 

would ... I 13:5 

would . .. on . .. on 

13:6 

written 16:18 

y 

you . . . as 11 : 2 4 

you'll 15:13 

you' 11 ... you 

15:18 

your ... you 12:15 

You' re ... you ' re 

8:16 

yourself 11:25 

19:1 

you've 12:5 

18:8 19:1