alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31(b)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

     I, Steven Kerr, hereby certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Gourmet Group,
Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;

     4. The registrant`s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual Report is
being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant`s disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
Annual Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this Annual Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant`s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant`s auditors and the audit
committee of registrant`s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant`s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant`s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant`s internal controls; and

     6. The registrant`s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
Annual Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                                 By: /s/ Steven Kerr
                                   _________________________________
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                Dated: September 22, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 73423)    
Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; NIAAA Fellowship Review Panel.                    

*Date:*                         November 1, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Luis Espinoza, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Extramural Project Review Branch, Office of Extramural Activities, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Room 2109, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 443-8599,                         *espinozala@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 4, 2024.

David W. Freeman, 

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-20368 Filed 9-9-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2298 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2298

To prohibit oil and gas leasing on the Outer Continental Shelf off the 
                         coast of New England.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 11, 2018

Mr. Whitehouse (for himself, Mr. Markey, Ms. Hassan, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. 
   Reed, Mr. King, Ms. Warren, Mr. Blumenthal, Ms. Collins, and Mr. 
    Murphy) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit oil and gas leasing on the Outer Continental Shelf off the 
                         coast of New England.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New England Coastal Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL 
              SHELF OFF THE COAST OF NEW ENGLAND.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(q) Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in Certain Areas of the 
Outer Continental Shelf.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
section or any other law, the Secretary may not issue a lease for the 
exploration for, or development or production of, oil or natural gas in 
any area of the outer Continental Shelf off the coast of the State of 
Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, or Connecticut.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

The National Transportation Safety Board will convene a public hearing beginning at 11 a.m., local time on Wednesday, December 13-15, 2000, in the Safety Board's Boardroom and Conference Center at 429 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 20594 concerning Alaska Airlines Flight 261 off the coast of California near Port Hueneme on January 31, 2000. For more information, contact Dick Rodriquez, NTSB Office of Aviation Safety at (202) 314-6317 or Terry N. Williams NTSB Office of Public Affairs at (202) 314-6100.

Individuals requesting specific accommodation should contact Mrs. Carolyn Dargan on 202-314-6305 by Friday December 8, 2000.

Dated: December 4, 2000.

Rhonda Underwood,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-31169  Filed 12-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-P
#### MALONE v. STATE.

No. 16944.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 13, 1934.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 24, 1934.

Fred Harris and Oren Parmeter, both of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for burglary; punishment, twelve years in the penitentiary.

The record is here without any statement of facts. By supplemental transcript appellant seeks to bring forward ten bills of exception. The term of the, trial court began on January 1, 1934, and adjourned on the 31st of March, 1934, it being apparent that the term of court lasted 'longer than eight weeks, in which case, under the terms of article 760, subd. 5, C. C. P., it is required that bills of exception shall be filed within thirty days after final judgment is rendered in any particular case, unless the court shall by order entered of record in such case extend the time for filing same.

On March 30, 1934, appellant’s motion for new trial was overruled, and he was then sentenced. On April 30, 1934, the court attempted to make an order giving appellant fifteen days’ additional time in which to file bills of exception. The thirty days allowed by statute for filing of such bills of exception expired on April 29th; hence the trial court was without power to make the order just referred to. The bills of exception appearing in said supplemental transcript were filed on May 15, 1934, and hence were filed too late to be considered. These are matters which are fixed by statute which this court has upheld in many opinions. All matters of procedure appear regular.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

At the time this case was disposed of originally there was not on file in the- office of our clerk any statement of facts. At this time the statement of facts has been forwarded and is duly on file.

However, the same serious objection arises to our consideration of the statement of facts which caused us to decline to consider appellant’s ten bills of exception, viz., said statement of facts was filed in the office of the clerk of the district court more than thirty days after the date of final judgment. It being apparent that the term of the trial *105court extended more than eight weeks, under the provisions of article 760, suhd. 5, O. O. P., it was imperative that the statement of facts as well as the bills of exception must have been filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court within thirty days after the final judgment, or else within such time there must have been made an extending order. No such order was made within thirty days, as observed in our original opinion.

Being unable to consider either appellant’s statement of facts or bills of exception, the motion for rehearing will be overruled.
Exhibit 10.3


 


NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 


This
Note Extension Agreement (the “Agreement”) is dated as of August 30, 2008
and is made by and between BRAD FOOTE GEAR WORKS, INC., f/k/a BFG Acquisition
Corp., an Illinois corporation (“Borrower”) and LASALLE BANK NATIONAL BANK
f/k/a LaSalle National Bank f/k/a LaSalle Bank NI, a national banking
association (the “Bank”).


 


R E C I T A L S


 


A.            Borrower has
previously delivered to the Bank its Amended and Restated Renewal Revolving
Note dated January 15, 2008 in the principal amount of $10,000,000.00, as
modified and extended by Note Extension Agreement dated as of June 30,
2008 (the “Note”), evidencing a revolving line of credit loan extended by the
Bank to the Borrower; and


 


B.            The Note matures on August 30,
2008, and Borrower has asked the Bank to extend the maturity date of the Note
until October 31, 2008; and


 


C.            The Bank has
consented to such loan request, on the terms hereinafter provided.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.             In the first line
of the first paragraph on page 1 of the Note, the date “August 30,
2008” is hereby deleted, and the date “October 31, 2008” is substituted
therefor. Borrower confirms to the Bank that the Note shall mature on October 31,
2008.


 


2.             Borrower
acknowledges and irrevocably agrees that the payment and performance of the
Note, as extended hereby, shall continue to be secured by Collateral Documents
(as such term is defined in the Loan and Security Agreement dated January 17,
1997 between the Borrower and the Bank, as amended from time to time).


 


3.             Except as expressly
modified by this Agreement, all terms and provisions of the Note shall stand
and remain in full force and effect.


 


SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS


 


1

















 


	
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this
  Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  BORROWER:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  BRAD
  FOOTE GEAR WORKS, INC.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ J.
  Cameron Drecoll

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  J.
  Cameron Drecoll

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Chief
  Executive Officer

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  BANK:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  LASALLE
  BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Katherine M. Novey

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Vice
  President

  	
   

  
					



 


2
**Exhibit 32: Section 1350 Certifications**

I, Howard Messing, Chief Executive Officer and President, certify this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Medical Information Technology, Inc. (MEDITECH) for the period ended June 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MEDITECH.

July 29, 2011(Date)

Howard Messing, Chief Executive Officer and President(Signature)

I, Barbara A. Manzolillo, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Medical Information Technology, Inc. (MEDITECH) for the period ended June 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MEDITECH.

July 29, 2011(Date)

Barbara A. Manzolillo, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Signature)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2005
CHARLES STEVEN MCLEAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CALDWELL COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; CALDWELLCOUNTY SHERIFF’S TELECOMMUNICATIONS; DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, of the State of North Carolina, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CA-99-72-5-V) Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 6, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Steven McLean, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).1 Because the record reveals that McLean is not a prisoner, the district court’s dismissal is more properly made under 28 U.S.C.A. S 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (West Supp. 1999). 2 The order from which McLean appeals was filed on June 30, 1999, and entered on the district court’s docket on July 6, 1999, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a). See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM:Charles Steven McLean appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C.A. S 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning1 of the district court. See McLean v. Caldwell County Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. CA-99-72-5-V (W.D.N.C. July 6, 1999). 2 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### 748

**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS**
**AUSTIN**

Hoaorablolcarlon

EeQee County Autlltor~ Imy8 couuty San WrooB, Texas
DMr sir:

your nqubrt fir quastlon haa

been mod on theab o ve l .tateQ

naation for ix ottiofo Ml-- 6ir j-t, rraaa c%mpall~~ iwary, pmniAed, mmh oompenaation ia rmior8rl2olm~aal2 net&nO~MM the oompaaation cf the offisial beyond the nmximuu of 06ap4matiou am3 exoosi3 fna allowed to be l-Ma1n.dby him UnbC thtr &lapt@t. Fro~l6@4,howtmer, the *I ait2do hs*ia authorbe8 shall ?M allwod only after an opportu.nity for a pubua **hearts& and**  enky upon **tha** efflm6~ tire rote ot at laa8gi thee* smmber8 of th coilr mieslonml4'OOurt." :

### 74

Honorable k%rlon roGee, Faga E

**In tier**  **of** the foregoing **statute you**  **are ruspeot**  lully **advised** that it is the opinion of this depsx-tmmt that the oommlasloners* oourt MY allow oompensstfon ror lx offiolo services when, In their juwnt such compensatlon Is neoessary,provided,sash oompeasation for ox oitlolo servicesallowod shall not fnoraaseoompensatlon or the oounty attorney beyoti tho maximua~ of oos,pensatfon and oxoosa rwm allowed to b retaiaodby him by the law. You are farth.er

advised that thesx ofrlolo authorleed by Artlola 3895, ailpra, shall be all.oweU

only **after** an opportunityfor **a** pub110 hearlag aad only upon ths **affir** rtlto **rota** of at lease three IIW~~IYJ **0i** the ~IRWLI~~IO~- ems* oourt.

mliarlng that the foregoinganowers yfmr InqrALr;r, we rennin rour6Terytmly

Ardoll wll11m Ar8lotant
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Netopia, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Mark H. Perry, as Interim Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | i. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Mark H. PerryMark H. Perry Interim Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)  Date: February 1, 2005
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129961 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129961 

 COA: 256493 

Wayne CC: 04-001903-01 

SCOTT BUTLER LESANE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0424 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2006 

Clerk
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)

I,
Richard W. Hunt, Chief Financial Officer of NeighborCare, Inc., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of NeighborCare, Inc. and subsidiaries;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|      |                   |  |                                  
|----- | ----------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|Date: | December 10, 2004 |  | /s/RICHARD W. HUNTRichard W. Hunt

---



QuickLinks
#### HAMM v. STATE.

No. 20167.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 1, 1939.

J. B. Clegg, of Trinity, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for ten years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.