alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IC 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2245 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 3, 2018 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To include New Zealand in the list of foreign states whose 

nationals are eligible for admission into the United 

States as E–1 and E–2 nonimmigrants if United States 

nationals are treated similarly by the Government of 

New Zealand. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

S 2245 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Knowledgeable 

3 Innovators and Worthy Investors Act’’ or the ‘‘KIWI 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT TRADERS AND INVESTORS. 

6 For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii) of section 

7 101(a)(15)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)), New Zealand shall be considered 

9 to be a foreign state described in such section if the Gov10 ernment of New Zealand provides similar nonimmigrant 

11 status to nationals of the United States. 

Passed the Senate June 28, 2018. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### FAA

- 201 1

- 1341 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2011

-NE

- 4 1

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labo r

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet 

### Replacement of starter adapter assembly 4 .0 $ 340.00 $ 

### 500 $ 840.00 

### 225 $189,000.00
$ 0.00 $ 0.00 4 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $189,000 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysi **s** ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : 

### This evaluation is based on 36,000 ECi cylinders that would affect 6,000 engines.

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1997<F1>
<CASH>                                       7,480,000              13,551,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,554,000              13,614,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,411,000              30,995,000
<PP&E>                                       6,833,000               2,534,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,025,000                 667,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,648,000              54,050,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,471,000               8,991,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        10,000                  10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,413,000              36,593,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,648,000              54,050,000
<SALES>                                     28,876,000              30,175,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,876,000              30,175,000
<CGS>                                       16,189,000              16,812,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,693,000              30,141,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (126,000)               (220,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                309,000                 254,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   124,000                  99,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            185,000                 155,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   185,000                 155,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02                    0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02                    0.02
<FN>
<F1>Restated
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.23**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofOn-Site Sourcing Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the Report), I, Christopher Weiler, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ Christopher Weiler  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
|                    |
| Christopher Weiler      |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| November14, 2002        |

 

----
Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on October 24, 1999, High Standard Products, 1100 W. Florence Avenue, #B, Inglewood, California 90301, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed below:

The firm plans to manufacture analytical reference standards.

Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration.

Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than April 10, 2000.

Dated: February 2, 2000.

John H. King,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-3148 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 229 

To provide for the confidentiality of information submitted in requests for 

the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2017 

Mr. HEINRICH (for himself, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. UDALL, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. BOOKER, Ms. HARRIS, Mr. WYDEN, and Mr. REED) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for the confidentiality of information submitted 

in requests for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect DREAMer 

5 Confidentiality Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION SUBMITTED 

7 FOR THE DEFERRED ACTION FOR CHILD8 HOOD ARRIVALS PROGRAM. 

9 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 229 IS

1 (1) DACA PROGRAM.—The term ‘‘DACA Pro2 gram’’ means the Deferred Action for Childhood Ar3 rivals Program announced on June 15, 2012. 

4 (2) INDIVIDUAL APPLICATION INFORMATION.— 

5 The term ‘‘individual application information’’ 

6 means any information, including personally identifi7 able information, submitted to the Secretary after 

8 June 15, 2012, as part of a request for consider9 ation or reconsideration for the DACA program. 

10 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

11 the Secretary of Homeland Security. 

12 SEC. 3. CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall protect indi14 vidual application information from disclosure to U.S. Im15 migration and Customs Enforcement or U.S. Customs and 

16 Border Protection for any purpose other than imple17 menting the DACA Program. 

18 (b) REFERRALS PROHIBITED.—The Secretary may 

19 not refer any individual whose case has been deferred pur20 suant to the DACA Program to U.S. Immigration and 

21 Customs Enforcement, U.S. Customs and Border Protec22 tion, the Department of Justice, or any other law enforce23 ment agency. 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 229 IS

1 (c) LIMITED EXCEPTION.—Individual application in2 formation may be shared with national security and law 

3 enforcement agencies— 

4 (1) to identify or prevent fraudulent claims; 

5 (2) for particularized national security purposes 

6 relating to an individual application; or 

7 (3) for the investigation or prosecution of any 

8 felony not related to immigration status. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.1****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION***     In connection with the Annual Report ofRetail Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (AmendmentNo. 1) forthe fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Heywood Wilansky, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.     Dated:August 1, 2006 By: /s/ Heywood Wilansky         Heywood Wilansky, President, Chief Executive Officer and    Director ***** This Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 ofTitle 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes ofSection 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. ThisCertification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing underthe Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.    A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 3.3**

 

**CERTIFICATE OFCORRECTIONTO THESECOND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATIONOFAMERICAN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**

 

AmericanMedical Technologies, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and byvirtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, does herebycertify as follows:

 

1.  The name of the corporation is AmericanMedical Technologies, Inc.

 

2.  A Second Restated Certificate ofIncorporation of American Medical Technologies, Inc. was filed by the Secretaryof the State of Delaware on September 30, 2002, and said Second RestatedCertificate of Incorporation requires correction as permitted by subsection (f)of Section 103 of The General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

 

3.  The inaccuracy or defect in said filing wasthat the amendment to Article Fourth of the Certificate of Incorporation wasnot approved by a vote of shareholders of the corporation.  Therefore, the filing of the Second RestatedCertificate of Incorporation should be rendered null and void.

 

IN WITNESSWHEREOF, the undersigned corporation has executed this Certificate ofCorrection to the Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation, this 10th dayof January, 2003.

 
|   | American  Medical Technologies, Inc. |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |                                 |
|   |                                 |
|   | By:                                  | */s/* Roger Dartt |   |
|   |                                 | Roger Dartt, President |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2376 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2376

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 515 Hope Street in Bristol, Rhode Island, as the ``First Sergeant P. 
                   Andrew McKenna Jr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 5, 2018

  Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Whitehouse) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 515 Hope Street in Bristol, Rhode Island, as the ``First Sergeant P. 
                   Andrew McKenna Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIRST SERGEANT P. ANDREW MCKENNA JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 515 Hope Street in Bristol, Rhode Island, shall be known and 
designated as the ``First Sergeant P. Andrew McKenna Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``First 
Sergeant P. Andrew McKenna Jr. Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
1 The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1911

___________ Jason Edward Fenner, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. Candis Taylor; Kristian Pawlik; * Charles Duell, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 27, 2004 Filed: June 3, 2004

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jason Edward Fenner appeals the district court’s 1 preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against a prosecutor and two public defenders involved in-2- state criminal proceedings against him. As relief, Mr. Fenner indicated he wanted a jury trial and a different attorney in his criminal case. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was proper. Mr. Fenner’s allegations and the relief he requested indicate that he was in effect challenging the validity of his guilty plea and conviction. The sole federal remedy for a state prisoner bringing such a challenge is a writ of habeas corpus, see Preiser v. Rodriguez , 411 U.S. 475, 499-500 (1973), and there is no indication in the record that Mr. Fenner has exhausted his state court remedies, see 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A); Carmichael v. White , 163 F.3d 1044, 1045 (8th Cir. 1998) (§ 2254 petitioner has burden to show all available state remedies have been exhausted or exceptional circumstances exist). Accordingly, we affirm, but we modify the dismissal to be without prejudice. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Mr. Fenner’s motion for appointment of counsel.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      12,423,732
<SECURITIES>                                21,223,053
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,722,761
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,135,481
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,026,679
<PP&E>                                       2,573,993
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,110,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,144,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,190,505
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,059
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,946,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,954,466
<SALES>                                      1,925,423
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,925,423
<CGS>                                        1,442,831
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,859,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,151,790)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,587
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,155,377)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.59)
        

</TABLE>
Topics for 111(d) discussion with EPA

Tuesday, September 29 2PM EST/11AM PST

1. Brief overview of BPA’s role and hydro operations in the Pacific Northwest – system network/system 

sales are coordinated regionally and are not state based. 

a. Implications of using 2012 as the baseline year

b. In the Clean Power Plan can EPA acknowledge the value and role of hydropower as a GHGfree resource?

2. Hydro efficiency upgrades – will upgrades to the federal hydro projects count as renewable 

resources towards state goals? 

3. Building Block IV: Energy Efficiency 

a. Consumer-owned utilities in the NW are very engaged in capturing energy efficiency and 

work closely with BPA to do so. BPA has measurement and verification protocols in place. 

Would it be useful to the EPA for BPA to describe energy efficiency reporting requirements, 

which we believe ensure the energy efficiency savings are real and measured?

b. In the NW we value the carbon reductions due to energy efficiency not based on our 

existing resource mix, but rather on the marginal resource mix. BPA’s primary governing 

statute (NW Power Act of 1980) defines energy efficiency as a resource, that is, energy 

efficiency “generates” megawatts because it avoids the need to build/run a physical 

resource. Thus, energy efficiency extends the value of our GHG-free hydro system. The 

draft EPA rules are contrary to this. If analytically, the marginal resource approach doesn’t 

work for EPA’s rules, would EPA consider setting a fixed GHG reduction value for every 

MWH of energy efficiency captured in the country?

4. Reliability concerns - to what extent has the EPA studied reliability impacts or transmission system

capacity due to coal plant closures and increased renewables? Where does EPA envision this 

reliability impact analysis happening?

5. Can EPA count renewable resource development and energy efficiency captured before 2017?

6. The Columbia River hydro system has reached its limits on integrating new wind. How does EPA 

envision integrating the significant increase of renewables (especially wind), given the significant 

decrease in fossil fuels that will be available to balance the system for integration?”

7. How would a mass-based goal be calculated?