alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.29

CERTIFICATION OF  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  DUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC.

I,
Peter S. Kirlin, Chief Executive Officer of DuPont Photomasks, Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, in connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2002 and filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission, do hereby certify that to my knowledge:

|/s/PETER S. KIRLINPeter S. Kirlin
Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------
|November 13, 2002                                        

I, Satish Rishi, Chief Financial Officer of DuPont Photomasks, Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2002 and filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission, do hereby certify that to my knowledge:

|/s/SATISH RISHISatish Rishi
Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------------------------------------
|November 13, 2002                                  

---

QuickLinks
#### The State, ex rel. Hayes et al., Appellees, *v.*Guckenberger, County Aud., et al.; Minges et al., Appellants.

(No. 28394

Decided July 9, 1941.)

*447
      *Mr. George*Metzger, for appellees.

*Mr. Nicholas Bauer*and *Mr. George J. Mountel,*for appellants.

By the Court.

Counsel for appellees raises only two questions in support of the motion to dismiss this appeal. First, were the appellants necessary and proper parties to the mandamus proceeding and, if so, *448did the Court of Appeals abuse its discretion in refusing to allow them to intervene? Second, was the entry from which this appeal was taken a final order ?

Counsel for appellants submit that these additional propositions are involved: First, error by the Court of Appeals in sustaining a demurrer which set up an affirmative defense; second, laches by present appellants in not endeavoring to intervene prior to the rendition of judgment by the Court of Appeals in the mandamus proceeding; and, third, whether the adjudication of the first injunction action (No. A-59238) precluded the taxpayers’ injunction proceeding (No. A-72585).

The refusal to permit a *necessary party*to intervene constitutes a final order under Section 12223-3, General Code, in that the denial affects a substantial right of such party.

Were the appellants *necessary parties*within Section 11255, General Code, which provides for the joinder of defendants? That section reads:

> “Any person may be made a defendant who has or claims an interest in the controversy *adverse to*the plaintiff, or who is a *necessary party*to a complete determination of a question involved therein.” (Italics ours.)

The appellants claimed an interest adverse to the relators in the mandamus proceeding in the Court of Appeals. However, the interest of the appellants was not adverse to that of the Board of Education of Berea Rural School District in the first injunction proceeding. The present appellants were content to abide by the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas in the first injunction case and to anticipate a favorable judgment by the Court of Appeals or this court before instituting the second injunction suit. Although the present appellants were not guilty of laches in the mandamus proceedings, that doctrine applies to their conduct with reference to the first action to enjoin the con*449solidation. *Chinn v. Trustees,*32 Ohio St., 236; *State, ex rel. Smith,*v. *Witter, Dir.,*114 Ohio St., 357, 151 N. E., 192.

The motion to dismiss the appeal will he sustained.

*Motion sustained.*

Weygandt, O. J., Turnee, Williams, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.

Matthias, J., not participating.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin Salinas, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 7, 2010



/s/ Martin Salinas, Jr.Martin Salinas, Jr.Chief Financial Officer


*A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to and will be retained by Energy
Transfer Partners, L.P.
#### TAYLOR et al. v. SOUTHWESTERN LUMBER CO. OF NEW JERSEY et al.

No. 2200.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

March 9, 1932.

Rehearing Denied March 16, 1932.

*402Tom P. Coleman and Curtis W. Eenley, .both of Lufkin, for appellants.

Andrews, Streetman, Logue & Mobley, of Houston, Terry, Cavin & Mills, of Galveston, and Mantooth & Denman and J. J. Collins, all of Lufkin, for appellees.

WALKER, J.

(after stating the facts as above).

The facts of this case seem to us to be absolutely on all fours with Pope v. Anthony, 29 Tex. Civ. App. 298, 68 S. W. 521, 524 (writ of error refused). In this ease, as in Pope v. Anthony, the land sought to be pre-empted was not entirely surrounded by previous surveys. The 50 cents per acre, as provided by the Act of February 1, 1860 (Laws 1860, c. 34), was not paid, and proof of occupancy was not made and filed. Determining the legal effect of these facts, on the issue of title to the land in question, the court said: “It appearing that the land sought to be preempted by Ward, Pope, and Chapman was not entirely surrounded by previous surveys, and that they nor either of them paid the 50 cents per acre as provided by said act of February 1, 1860, and it further appearing that they nor either of them complied with the terms and conditions of the acts of 1870 and 1871 prior to 1889, it follows that they had not acquired any vested right in the land, and that when the pre-emption laws were repealed they lost all interest which they had in the land arising under these several acts.”

. Appellants have ably briefed their assignments and propositions of error, but as Pope v. Anthony controls this case, a further discussion of the assignments of error is not necessary.

The judgment of the lower court is in all things affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 11

                            USCS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                       (In thousands except per share data)
                                  (Unaudited)

                                                       Three months ended
                                                            March 31,
                                                      ---------------------
                                                       1997           1996
                                                      ------         ------
Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding
during the period                                     23,096         18,329

Common stock equivalents
considered to be outstanding
for the periods presented                              1,128          2,330
                                                      ------         ------
                                                      24,224         20,659

Net income                                            $5,053         $2,563

Earnings per share                                     $0.21          $0.12
SERVED: AUGUST 26, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

JET MIDWEST TECHNIK, INC. 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-0637 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014CE050039) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 

I -:; ;...J 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

Patrick Kraus, President 

Jet Midwest Technik, Inc., Respondent 

9200 NW 112th Street 

Kansas City, MO 64153 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel 

The Aviation Law Firm, 

1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway 

Suite 300 

Annapolis, MD 21401 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

Mark G. Camacho, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

901 Locust Street, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3765 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

Hon. J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAJ<: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0637 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4798-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Texas (FEMA-4798-DR), dated July 9, 2024, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued August 2, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Texas is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of July 9, 2024.

Austin, Bowie, Shelby, Trinity, and Waller Counties for Individual Assistance (already designated for debris removal and emergency protective measures [Categories A and B], including direct Federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-20499 Filed 9-10-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2377 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2377

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 200 West 2nd Street in Dayton, Ohio, as the ``Walter H. Rice Federal 
                Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. WALTER H. RICE FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES 
COURTHOUSE.
    (a) In General.--The Federal building and United States courthouse 
located at 200 West 2nd Street in Dayton, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Walter H. Rice Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 
United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ``Walter H. Rice Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 32



D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, James W. Morozzi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or § 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ James W. Morozzi
|Name:                |  | James W. Morozzi       
|Title:               |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                |  | May 9, 2005            



1



---

D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 of D&E Communications,
Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Morell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or § 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Thomas E. Morell
|Name:                |  | Thomas E. Morell       
|Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                |  | May 9, 2005            



2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BAYCORP HOLDINGS, LTD. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          14,767
<SECURITIES>                                       381
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,630
<PP&E>                                         121,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,532
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 176,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,081
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,294
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   176,468
<SALES>                                         14,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,334
<CGS>                                           18,705
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,705
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,811)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.46)


</TABLE>
Amendment

     

    WHEREAS,
      MRU
      Holdings, Inc., successor-in-interest to Iempower, Inc. (the “Company”) and Raza
      Khan (“Executive” and, with the Company, the “Parties”) are parties to an
      Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2004, as amended by that Waiver and
      Amendment dated September 29, 2008, as further amended by that Amendment dated
      September 29, 2008, as further amended by that Amendment dated October 17,
      2008,
      as further amended by that Waiver and Amendment dated October 31, 2008 (the
      “Agreement”).

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby
      acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

     

    1.  The
      Parties hereby agree to amend Section 1 of the Agreement by striking the phrase
      “on or before November 5, 2008” and replacing it with the phrase “on or before
      November 21, 2008.” 

     

    2.  Except
      as
      modified herein, the remainder of the terms and provisions of the Agreement
      will
      remain in full force and effect.

     

     

    UNDERSTOOD,
      AGREED, AND ACCEPTED:

     

    


    
      	RAZA KHAN	MRU HOLDINGS,
              INC.
	 	 
	 	 
	/s/ Raza Khan	By: /s/
              Yariv Katz
	 	Name: Yariv Katz
	 	Title:    General
              Counsel
	 	 
	 	 
	Date: November 5, 2008	Date: November 5, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          22,029
<SECURITIES>                                    15,064
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,407
<ALLOWANCES>                                       116
<INVENTORY>                                      1,494
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,367
<PP&E>                                          12,012
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,075
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,330
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,628
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,331
<SALES>                                         46,928
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,046
<CGS>                                           10,107
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    55
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,298
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,406
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,892
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,892
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>