Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 12, 2010 / Notices 26751 

Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal 

holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Amanetta Somerville, Environmental 

Scientist, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. 

Somerville can be reached at 404–562– 

9025, or via electronic mail at 

somerville.amanetta@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 

21, 2009, the State of North Carolina, 

through the North Carolina Department 

of Environment and Natural Resources 

(NCDENR), submitted the attainment 

demonstration for the 1997 PM2.5

nonattainment area for the Hickory 

Area. The Hickory 1997 PM2.5

nonattainment area is comprised of 

Catawba County, North Carolina. North 

Carolina’s attainment demonstration 

included a MVEB for NOX and an 

insignificance finding for the overall 

contribution of direct PM2.5 from mobile 

sources to the PM2.5 pollution in 

Catawba County. 

EPA Region 4 sent a letter to NCDENR 

on January 20, 2010, stating that the 

2009 NOX MVEB in the 1997 PM2.5

attainment demonstration for the 

Hickory Area was adequate for the 

purposes of transportation conformity 

purposes. The letter identified the NOX

MVEB as 2,887,955 kgd. Subsequently, 

in response to North Carolina’s 

submission, on March 1, 2010, EPA 

notified the public of its finding of 

adequacy for the NOX MVEB and also 

identified the NOX MVEB as 2,887,955 

kgd. The units of measure provided in 

North Carolina’s submission for the 

NOX MVEB are actually kgy and not kgd 

so EPA is correcting this error. The 

March 1, 2010, rulemaking also 

contained an inadvertent error to the 

docket ID number, published as EPA– 

R04–OAR–2009–0561. The correct 

docket ID number is EPA–R04–OAR– 

2009–0751, which EPA is correcting 

through this action. 

On April 20, 2010, EPA sent a letter 

to North Carolina noting this error and 

announcing that a correcting 

amendment (this notice) would be 

published soon to alert the public to this 

correction. Below identifies the correct 

NOX MVEBs for the Hickory Area. 

HICKORY AREA NOX MVEB 

[Kilograms per year] 

2009 

Catawba County ....................... 2,887,995 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: May 3, 2010. 

A. Stanley Meiburg, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 2010–11304 Filed 5–11–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0865; FRL–9150–6] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed Collection; 

Comment Request; Internet Survey 

Research for Improving Fuel Economy 

Label Design and Content; EPA ICR 

No. 2390.01, OMB Control No. 2060– 

NEW 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document 

announces that EPA is planning to 

submit a request for a new Information 

Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB). Before 

submitting the ICR to OMB for review 

and approval, EPA is soliciting 

comments on specific aspects of the 

proposed information collection as 

described below. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before June 11, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2009–0865 by one of the following 

methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• E-mail: a-and-r-Docket@epa.gov. 

• Fax: (202) 566–1741. 

• Mail: Environmental Protection 

Agency, EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), 

Air and Radiation Docket, Mail Code 

2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, 

NW., Washington, DC 20460, Attention 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2009– 

0865. 

• Hand Delivery: Docket Center, 

(EPA/DC) EPA West, Room B102, 1301 

Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC, Attention Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2009–0865. Such deliveries are 

only accepted during the Docket’s 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Docket’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2009– 

0865. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http:// 

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Roberts French, Compliance and 

Innovative Strategies Division, Office of 

Transportation and Air Quality, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 2000 

Traverwood Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48105; 

telephone number: (734) 214–4380; fax 

number: (734) 214–4869; e-mail address: 

French.Roberts@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

How can I access the Docket and/or 

submit comments? 

EPA has established a public docket 

for this ICR under Docket ID No. EPA– 

HQ–OAR–2009–0865, which is 

available for online viewing at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, or in person 

viewing at the Air and Radiation Docket 

and Information Center in the EPA 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, 

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., 

NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC 

Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 

a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES

26752 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 12, 2010 / Notices 

telephone number for the Reading Room 

is 202–566–1744, and the telephone 

number for the OAR Docket is 202–566– 

1742. 

Use http://www.regulations.gov to 

obtain a copy of the draft collection of 

information, submit or view public 

comments, access the index listing of 

the contents of the docket, and to access 

those documents in the public docket 

that are available electronically. Once in 

the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in 

the docket ID number identified in this 

document. 

What information is EPA particularly 

interested in? 

Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of 

the PRA, EPA specifically solicits 

comments and information to enable it 

to: 

(i) Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

Agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

(iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(iv) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology, e.g., permitting 

electronic submission of responses. 

What should I consider when I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

You may find the following 

suggestions helpful for preparing your 

comments: 

1. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible and provide specific examples. 

2. Describe any assumptions that you 

used. 

3. Provide copies of any technical 

information and/or data you used that 

support your views. 

4. If you estimate potential burden or 

costs, explain how you arrived at the 

estimate that you provide. 

5. Offer alternative ways to improve 

the collection activity. 

6. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the deadline identified 

under DATES. 

7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, 

be sure to identify the docket ID number 

assigned to this action in the subject 

line on the first page of your response. 

You may also provide the name, date, 

and Federal Register citation. 

What information collection activity or 

ICR does this apply to? 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2009– 

0865. 

Affected Entities: Entities potentially 

affected by this action are randomly 

selected U.S. citizens. Some screening 

may be done to ensure that the 

respondents may have some familiarity 

with fuel economy and fuel economy 

labels. For example, respondents could 

be randomly selected from records of 

people who have recently purchased a 

vehicle. Details regarding the specific 

sampling method concepts are 

discussed below in section I.B.1. 

Title: Focus Group and Internet 

Survey Research for Improving Fuel 

Economy Label Design and Content. 

ICR Numbers: EPA ICR No. 2390.01, 

OMB Control No. 2060–NEW. 

ICR Status: This ICR is for a new 

information collection activity. An 

Agency may not conduct or sponsor, 

and a person is not required to respond 

to, a collection of information, unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. The OMB control numbers for 

EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the CFR, 

after appearing in the Federal Register 

when approved, are listed in 40 CFR 

part 9, are displayed either by 

publication in the Federal Register or 

by other appropriate means, such as on 

the related collection instrument or 

form, if applicable. The display of OMB 

control numbers in certain EPA 

regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR 

part 9. 

I. Description of Information Collection 

Activities 

A. Background 

EPA is responsible under the Energy 

Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 

(EPCA) for developing the fuel economy 

labels that are posted on window 

stickers of all new light duty cars and 

trucks sold in the U.S. and, beginning 

with the 2011 model year, on all new 

medium-duty passenger vehicles (a 

category that includes large sport-utility 

vehicles and passenger vans). 

In 2006, EPA updated how the city 

and highway fuel economy values are 

calculated to better reflect typical realworld driving patterns and provide 

more realistic fuel economy estimates. 

Since then, a projected increase in 

market penetration of advanced 

technology vehicles, in particular plugin hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and 

electric vehicles (EVs), will require new 

label metrics to effectively communicate 

information to consumers. EPA projects 

an increase in the near future in the 

market penetration of advanced 

technology vehicles like PHEVs and 

EVs. These vehicles run on electricity 

obtained from the grid in addition to 

gasoline, and therefore their fuel 

consumption cannot be precisely 

conveyed by the current miles-pergallon (MPG) metric. 

As part of its ongoing responsibilities 

under EPCA, EPA sought public 

comments in the ‘‘Proposed Rulemaking 

to Establish Light-Duty Vehicle 

Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards 

and Corporate Average Fuel Economy 

Standards’’ (September 28, 2009; 74 FR 

49454, at 49576) on issues surrounding 

consumer vehicle labeling of 

conventional gasoline vehicles in 

general and labeling of advanced 

technology vehicles in particular. At 

that time, EPA announced plans to 

initiate a separate rulemaking to explore 

in detail the information displayed on 

the current fuel economy label and 

requested comments on providing 

relevant information to consumers, 

including adding information regarding 

fuel economic such as consumption in 

fuel use. EPA also requested comments 

on approaches to providing information 

about a vehicle’s greenhouse gas 

emissions. 

Recently, the 2007 Energy 

Independence and Security Act (EISA) 

introduced additional new labeling 

requirements that are to be implemented 

by the National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration (NHTSA). In the same 

proposed rulemaking as EPA 

(September 28, 2009; 74 FR 49454, at 

49739), NHTSA also requested 

comments on how it should undertake 

its new labeling responsibilities. 

To maximize regulatory efficiency, 

minimize the burden on manufacturers 

and provide the best information 

possible to American consumers, EPA 

and NHTSA are conducting a joint 

rulemaking to redesign the current fuel 

economy label. The primary purposes of 

this regulatory action are: (1) To design 

new fuel economy labels that are 

consistent with the EISA requirements 

in 40 U.S.C. 32908(g), (2) to develop 

labels that address the unique nature of 

advanced technology vehicles that use 

electricity and gasoline, and (3) to 

propose adding some new information 

and changing the overall look of all fuel 

economy labels for all conventional 

vehicles (while continuing to meet the 

statutory requirements in EPCA). 

These purposes all fall under an 

overarching goal of better informing 

consumers about the fuel consumption, 

fuel costs, and environmental impacts 

associated with new vehicles at both the 

point of purchase and while conducting 

pre-purchase research. Specifically, the 

re-designed labels will need to meet the 

requirements defined by 49 U.S.C. 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 12, 2010 / Notices 26753 

1See 74 FR 63149, December 2, 2009, for EPA’s 

initial Notice for Proposed Collection and Comment 

Request regarding the ICR for these activities. 

32908(b) and 32908(g) as detailed 

below. 

EPA’s statutory labeling requirements 

are found in 49 U.S.C. 32908(b) and 

require that the label contain: 

• The fuel economy of the 

automobile. 

• The estimated annual fuel cost of 

operating the automobile. 

• The range of fuel economy of 

comparable automobiles of all 

manufacturers. 

• A statement that a booklet is 

available from the dealer to assist in 

making a comparison of fuel economy of 

other automobiles manufactured by all 

manufacturers in that model year. 

• The amount of the automobile fuel 

efficiency tax imposed on the sale of the 

automobile under section 4064 of the 

Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 

U.S.C. 4064). 

• Other related information required 

or authorized by the EPA Administrator 

NHTSA’s statutory labeling 

requirements are found in 49 U.S.C. 

32908(g) and additionally require: 

• Information on a vehicle’s 

performance over its useful life with 

respect to: 

• Fuel economy. 

• Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. 

• Other emissions. 

• The creation of a rating system for 

consumers to easily compare, at the 

point of purchase, vehicles’ fuel 

economy, GHG emissions, and other 

emissions, including designations of the 

vehicles with: 

• Lowest GHG emissions over the 

useful life of the vehicles. 

• Highest fuel economy. 

To help the agencies develop a joint 

label that meets the statutory 

requirements as well as the policy 

objectives outlined above, EPA is 

conducting voluntary focus groups and 

an Internet survey over the course of 

developing the rulemaking to solicit 

information from a diverse group of 

consumers regarding what information 

displayed on the fuel economy label 

will best serve the intended purpose of 

providing consumers with useful and 

meaningful information about the fuel 

efficiency of the vehicles they are 

considering purchasing.1 EPA is in the 

process of conducting three ‘‘phases’’ of 

focus groups. Each phase has a different 

concentration, enabling us to test 

consumer comprehension of and 

reaction to different fuel economy, cost, 

and environmental information and 

label displays. The result of these focus 

groups, when combined, will increase 

EPA and NHTSA’s understanding of 

which potential label metrics, 

information and overall label displays 

present the required information in a 

more understandable and compelling 

manner. 

The first focus group (conducted 

under ICR Number 2343.01) aimed to 

test consumer understanding and use of 

the current fuel economy label and the 

importance of various information 

elements on today’s label. This phase 

also assessed consumer reactions to the 

introduction of new information on 

future labels for conventionally fueled 

vehicles. Specifically, consumers were 

asked to consider various presentations 

of fuel economy and fuel consumption, 

fuel cost, environmental performance, 

and other factors. The second phase 

(conducted under ICR Number 2343.02) 

focused on determining what 

information is most important and 

helpful on labels for advanced 

technology vehicles and how that 

information is best presented. 

Specifically, the second focus group 

tested what metrics (fuel economy and 

fuel consumption, fuel cost, 

environmental performance, etc.) are 

most appropriate for electric vehicles, 

extended-range electric vehicles, and 

plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and how 

the labels can best inform consumers of 

the fact that vehicle fuel consumption 

and efficiency depends significantly on 

how the vehicles are used. The third 

phase of focus group research, currently 

in the planning stages, will ask 

consumers to assist in developing the 

most effective and compelling 

presentation for the overall label, 

ensuring that all options tested include 

elements meeting all EPCA and EISA 

statutory requirements. This notice 

requests comment on the Internet 

survey as described in section I.B. 

below. 

The upcoming joint EPA/NHTSA 

notice of proposed rulemaking will 

propose a collection of label designs for 

consideration and public comment. 

These designs will be based largely on 

the focus group research. Following 

conclusion of the focus group research, 

EPA will conduct an Internet-based 

survey to test the label designs 

developed and tested in the focus 

groups with a broader audience. This 

notice discusses the potential survey 

sampling methods, survey question 

types, and broad content. As described 

below, EPA is seeking comments on the 

outlined approach for the Internet 

survey. 

B. Internet Survey 

The goals of the Internet survey are to 

examine how understandable the new 

label designs are, and whether the new 

labels will improve consumers’ abilities 

to select more fuel-efficient vehicles. It 

will test these questions for both 

conventional and advanced technology 

vehicles. 

1. Sampling Method 

Based on OMB guidance, this study 

plans to use two convenience samples: 

Self-selected U.S. new vehicle 

purchasers and people who have 

expressed an intention to purchase a 

new vehicle by requesting a price quote 

from a dealer. Because the study is not 

a probability-based sample, it may not 

yield estimates representative of the 

target population, new vehicle buyers. 

However, even if the results are not 

representative of the population, the 

agencies believe that the study design 

will provide quantitative estimates of 

differences in consumer responses 

between various test conditions, and it 

may be possible to adjust results to 

reflect differences between the 

respondents and the target population. 

These samples will be divided into a 

number of separate groups (the number 

of groups depends on the number of 

label designs being tested). One version 

of the online survey will be developed 

for each group, identical in every way 

except that each of the groups will see 

only one of the label designs to be 

tested. To estimate the burden of this 

information collection we are assuming 

approximately 500 respondents for each 

label being tested, and a maximum of 12 

different label designs (consisting of 3 

overall labels with 4 unique associated 

labels to address (1) gasoline, (2) 

electric, (3) plug-in hybrid, and (3) 

extend-range plug-in hybrid vehicle 

needs), thus resulting in a potential 

maximum of 6,000 respondents. 

To test respondents’ understanding of 

the labels, each respondent will be 

shown a series of paired labels. In each 

pair, all vehicle characteristics will be 

held constant except the metric whose 

understanding is being tested. For 

instance, the fuel economy of the 

vehicles may differ, or one may be a 

conventional vehicle and one an electric 

vehicle. The consumer will then be 

asked to identify which vehicle has a 

better rating for the metric being tested. 

For instance, the consumer would be 

asked which vehicle has better fuel 

economy, or is less expensive to drive 

for a short distance. If one group scores 

more highly in answering these 

questions correctly, then the label 

associated with that group will appear 

to be more understandable than the 

other labels. 

To test the influence of the labels, 

respondents will face similar pairs of 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES

26754 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 12, 2010 / Notices 

labels for vehicles with all vehicle 

attributes constant except those varied 

on the label. Instead of identifying the 

label that has the better metric, the 

respondent would be asked which of 

these vehicles she would prefer to buy. 

Comparisons will involve both 

conventional and advanced technology 

vehicles. Respondents may be asked to 

decide based not only on metrics, but 

also on price differences. For instance, 

a respondent may see a vehicle with 

better fuel economy but a higher 

purchase price. Because the survey will 

collect respondents’ demographic and 

commute-pattern information, it will be 

possible to assess whether the 

commuter chose the vehicle that had 

lower costs for her commute. 

For both these areas of study, the use 

of discrete-choice questions is intended 

to reduce both the time burden on 

respondents and the potential for 

respondents to manipulate results 

through strategic responses to questions. 

2. Methods To Maximize Response Rate 

and Deal With Non-Response 

We will use a number of approaches 

to increase the response rate and 

minimize potential non-response bias. 

These methods will include: 

• Optimizing the questionnaire length 

and question types to strike the right 

balance between obtaining the necessary 

information and ensuring the 

questionnaire is not burdensome. The 

target length for the survey is 15 

minutes. 

• Interviewing five representative 

respondents using cognitive interview 

techniques in order to identify areas of 

misunderstanding, improved question 

wording, and areas of potential length 

reduction. 

• Pre-testing the survey with a sample 

of 50 representative respondents to 

ensure that the survey programming 

functions as planned and that the data 

is stored in a way that allows for indepth data analysis. 

• Ensuring anonymity of respondent 

data by keeping any identifying 

information in a separate file from 

survey question responses. Appropriate 

procedures will be enacted to prevent 

unauthorized access to respondent data 

and by preventing disclosure of the 

responses of individual participants. 

• Providing respondents with the 

primary investigator’s contact 

information so that they can ask any 

questions regarding the questionnaire. 

• Monitoring the response rate daily 

and address any issues daily in order to 

increase the response rate and reduce 

burden to respondents. 

II. Burden Statement 

The public reporting and 

recordkeeping burden for the Internet 

online survey collection of information 

is estimated to average 20 minutes per 

response. Burden means the total time, 

effort, or financial resources expended 

by persons to generate, maintain, retain, 

or disclose or provide information to or 

for a Federal agency. This includes the 

time needed to review instructions; 

develop, acquire, install, and utilize 

technology and systems for the purposes 

of collecting, validating, and verifying 

information, processing and 

maintaining information, and disclosing 

and providing information; adjust the 

existing ways to comply with any 

previously applicable instructions and 

requirements which have subsequently 

changed; train personnel to be able to 

respond to a collection of information; 

search data sources; complete and 

review the collection of information; 

and transmit or otherwise disclose the 

information. 

The ICR provides a detailed 

explanation of the Agency’s estimate, 

which is only briefly summarized here: 

Estimated total number of potential 

respondents: 6000. 

Frequency of response: One time. 

Estimated total average number of 

responses for each respondent: 1. 

Estimated total annual burden hours: 

2080 hours. 

Estimated total annual burden costs: 

$61,152. 

What is the next Step in the process for 

this ICR? 

EPA will consider the comments 

received. The final ICR package for the 

online Internet survey will be submitted 

to OMB for review and approval 

pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. If you have 

any questions about this ICR or the 

approval process, please contact the 

technical person listed under FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 

Dated: May 6, 2010. 

Margo T. Oge, 

Director, Office of Transportation and Air 

Quality. 

[FR Doc. 2010–11294 Filed 5–11–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0388; FRL–8824–1] 

Pesticide Products; Registration 

Applications 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: EPA has received applications 

to register pesticide products containing 

active ingredients not included in any 

previously registered pesticide 

products. Pursuant to the provisions of 

section 3(c)(4) of the Federal Insecticide, 

Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act 

(FIFRA), EPA is hereby providing notice 

of receipt and opportunity to comment 

on these applications. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before June 11, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number specified below by one of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs 

(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001. 

• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public 

Docket (7502P), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One 

Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. 

Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries 

are only accepted during the Docket 

Facility’s normal hours of operation 

(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays). 

Special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. The 

Docket Facility’s telephone number is 

(703) 305–5805. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

the docket ID number specified for the 

pesticide of interest as shown in the 

registration application summaries. 

EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the docket 

without change and may be made 

available on-line at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov website is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

regulations.gov, your e-mail address 

will be automatically captured and 

included as part of the comment that is 

placed in the docket and made available 

on the Internet. If you submit an 

electronic comment, EPA recommends 

that you include your name and other 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES