alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 238 (Monday, December 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 77342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31393]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE


Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area (SRA) Advisory Council

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Advisory Council meeting 
will convene in Salem, Oregon on Saturday, January 6, 2001. The meeting 
is scheduled to begin at 9:00 a.m., and will conclude at approximately 
2:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Salem City Library, Louch 
Hall, located on 585 Liberty Street SE in Salem, Oregon.
    The Opal Creek Wilderness and Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Act 
of 1996 (Opal Creek Act) (Pub. L. 104-208) directed the Secretary of 
Agriculture to establish the Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Advisory 
Council. The Advisory Council is comprised of thirteen members 
representing state, county and city governments, and representatives of 
various organizations, which include mining industry, environmental 
organizations, inholders in Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area, economic 
development, Indian tribes, adjacent landowners and recreation 
interests. The council provides advice to the Secretary of Agriculture 
on preparation of a comprehensive Opal Creek Management Plan for the 
SRA, and consults on a periodic and regular basis on the management of 
the area. The tentative agenda will include refining issue statements 
and describing the desired future condition of the SRA.
    The public comment period is tentatively scheduled to begin at 1:00 
p.m. Time allotted for individual presentations will be limited to 3 
minutes. Written comments are encouraged, particularly if the material 
cannot be presented within the time limits of the comment period. 
Written comments may be submitted prior to the January 6 meeting by 
sending them to Designated Federal Official Stephanie Phillips at the 
address given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information regarding this 
meeting, contact Designated Federal Official Stephanie Phillips; 
Willamette National Forest, Detroit Ranger District, HC 73 Box 320, 
Mill City, OR 97360; (503) 854-3366.

    Dated: December 4, 2000.
Darrel Kenops,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 00-31393 Filed 12-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0 066 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL JOSEPH MCCOY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 4 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 28 2020

09/28/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0066
# E C 

# / R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

501 Eastowne Drive, Suite 25 0  Chapel Hill, North Carolina 2751 4

Telephone: (919)484

- 0222  Fax: (919) 484

- 0122 MEMORANDUM

Date: June 1, 2010

To: Bruce Moore, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/CCG

From: Robert Vogt , EC/R Incorporated

Heather Brown, EC/R Incorporated

Subject: Documentation of the May 12, 2010 EPA site visits to the BP America

Production Company Cheairs and Branch field compressio n and

separation facilities

I. INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this memorandum is to document visits to two BP America Production

Company (BP) oil and natural gas facilities located near Carthage, Texas, within the East Texas

basin. These two sites included t he Cheairs Compression facility and James T. Branch facility.

II. LOCATION & DATE

The site visits took place on May 12, 2010, at the Cheairs Compression and James T.

Branch facilities. The facilities are located near Carthage, Texas, in Panola County.

III. ATTENDEES

API

Matt Todd , Regulatory Analyst

Cathe Kalisz

BP

Jeffrey A. Adams, Manager, Regulatory Affairs

Rick Collins

Mike Sutton

Scott Carrell

Other BP employees were present at the facility however their names were not recorded.ExxonMobil

Tom Monahan, Senior Regulatory Specialist

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA /OAQPS )

Alex MacPherson , Health and Environmental Impacts Division, Air Benefit and Cost Group

Bruce Moore , Sector Policies and Programs Division, Coatings and Chemicals Group

Jodi Howard , Sector Policies and Programs Division, Coatings and Chemicals Group

Nick Parsons , Sector Policies and Programs Division, Coatings and Chemicals Group

Rachel Agnew , Sector Policies and Programs Division, Measurement Policy Group

EC/R In corporated

Heather Brown

Phil Norwood

Robert Vogt

The site visit report for this facility contains confidential business information (CBI), and

pending approval by the facility, a non

- confidential report has not been issued.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for the twelve months ended December 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference in such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,723,447
<SECURITIES>                                21,720,568
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,562
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     43,575
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,554,506
<PP&E>                                       5,431,249
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,573,262)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,695,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       42,907,072
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       219,222
<OTHER-SE>                                  92,142,138
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,695,264
<SALES>                                        220,837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,232,169
<CGS>                                          150,432
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               60,485,738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (55,377,380)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (55,377,380)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (55,377,380)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.93)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

    I, Peter Boneparth, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Annual Report of Jones Apparel Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of Jones ApparelGroup, Inc.

By: /s/ Peter Boneparth

Name: Peter Boneparth Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

 

*A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and will be retainedby Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.*

 

    I, Wesley R. Card, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Annual Report of Jones Apparel Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of Jones ApparelGroup, Inc.

By: /s/ Wesley R. Card

Name: Wesley R. Card Title: Chief Operating and Financial Officer

 

*A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and will be retainedby Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.*
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
      10.9

    


    JAG
      Media Holdings, Inc.

    6865
      S.W. 18th Street, Suite B13

    Boca
      Raton, FL 33433

    


    November
      12, 2008

    


    Thomas
      J.
      Mazzarisi

    c/o
      JAG
      Media Holdings, Inc.

    6865
      S.W.
      18th
      Street,
      Suite B13

    Boca
      Raton, FL 33433

    


    Re: Extension
      of Amended and Restated Employment Agreement

    


    Dear
      Tom:

    


    This
      letter sets forth an agreement amending your current Amended and Restated
      Employment Agreement with JAG Media Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) dated August
      31, 2001, as amended November 3, 2005 and November 12, 2007 (the “Agreement”).
      Except as specifically agreed hereby, the Agreement, even though it has by
      its
      terms expired, shall continue in full force and effect through August 31, 2009.
      Section references below refer to sections in the Agreement. 

    


    Section
      1
      shall read in full as follows:

    


    “1. Term.
      This Agreement will govern the principal terms and conditions of your employment
      from August 31, 2004 until August 31, 2009 (the “Term”), and the termination
      thereof that occurs during, and in certain as specified below, upon or following
      the expiration of the Term.”

    


    The
      term
“Year 3” as used in Section 3 shall mean the year ending August 31, 2009.



    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    


    To
      indicate your agreement to the foregoing, please sign and return the enclosed
      copy of this letter.

    


    
      	
              Sincerely
                yours,

            
	 	 
	
              JAG
                MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.

            
	 	 
	
              By:

            	
              /s/
                Stephen J. Schoepfer

            
	
              Name:     Stephen
                J. Schoepfer

            
	
              Title:       President
                and Chief Operating Officer

            


    

    


    Agreed
      to and accepted as of the

    date
      first above written

    


    /s/
      Thomas J.
      Mazzarisi                          

    THOMAS
      J.
      MAZZARISI
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134471 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134471 

 COA: 267292 

Wayne CC: 05-005842-01

DEANGELO PIERRE EDMONDS,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 17, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF
                    CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 UNITED STATES CODE

          Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of CITGO Petroleum Corporation (the "Registrant"), does
hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

          The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2005 of the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.


Dated: November 8, 2005                 /s/ Felix Rodriguez
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Felix Rodriguez
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

PHILLIPS-HALL-SYNELL, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

FANNIE MAE A/K/A FEDERAL 

NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 85 EM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2016, the Application for Extraordinary and 

King’s Bench Jurisdiction is DENIED. 

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT C.J., Respondent

v. S.J., Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 286 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 6th day of October, 2014, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is DENIED
.
<PAGE>





                             TAVA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                                               Exhibit 21.1



                   LIST OF ALL SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Name (and d/b/a name, if any,) of subsidiary      Jurisdiction of incorporation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Advanced Control Technology, Inc.                           Oregon

Visioneering Holding Corp.                                 California

Management Design and Consulting Services, Inc.             Georgia

All Control Systems, Inc.                                 Pennsylvania

TAVA Alabama, Inc.                                           Colorado

TAVA Y2k One, Inc.                                           Colorado

Tech Sales, Inc.                                             Colorado

Topro Systems Integration, Inc.                              Colorado
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\ ;-.;: * Hp;: ,'j ^ •'.''•" »"i 11' .* r* ; > 2015 NOV -9 AH 9:Ul:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,

GEBREMESKEL TIKUE GEBRETENSAE, Appellant. DIVISION ONE No. 72408-8-1
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED: November 9, 2015 

### Dwyer, J. —Gebremeskel Gebretensae appeals hisconviction for felony 

### harassment, arguing that the court's reasonable doubt instruction is unconstitutional "because it requires thejury to articulate a reason to establish a reasonable doubt." We affirm. 

### When a defendant proposes an instruction identical to an instruction he 

### later challenges on appeal, theinvited errordoctrine bars review. Statev. Studd, 137Wn.2d 533, 546-47, 973 P.2d 1049 (1999). Thisrule applies even ifthe 

### defendant's requested instruction was aWashington Pattern Jury Instruction 

### previously approved bythecourts. Studd, 137 Wn.2d at546-48; State v. Henderson. 114 Wn.2d 867, 870, 792 P.2d 514 (1990). Here, Gebretensae 

### proposed the very instruction he challenges on appeal. Review is therefore barred by the invited error doctrine.No. 72408-8-1/2 In any case, Gebretensae's argument is meritless. The challenged instruction, which is taken from 11 Washington Practice: Washington Pattern Jury Instructions: Criminal 4.01, at 85 (3d ed. 2008) (WPIC), states in pertinent part: A reasonable doubt is one for which a reason exists and may arise from the evidence or lack of evidence. It is such a doubt as would exist in the mind of a reasonable person after fully, fairly, and carefully considering all ofthe evidence or lack ofevidence. (Emphasis added.) Nothing in this language requiresjurors to articulate a
reason. Read in context, the phrase "'a doubt for which a reason exists'" does not direct thejury to assign a reason for their doubts, but 

### merely points out that their doubts must be based on reason, and not something vague or imaginary. Aphrase in this context has been declared satisfactory in this jurisdiction for over 70 years. 

### State v. Thompson, 13Wn. App. 1, 5, 533 P.2d 395 (1975).1 Our State Supreme 

### Court recently reached a similar conclusion in Statev. Kalebauoh, 183Wn.2d 578, 355 P.3d 253 (2015). TheKalebaugh court held that a trial court misstated the law when it orally instructed thejury that a reasonable doubt "is a doubtfor which a reason can be given," and thatit should have read them"the correctjury instruction that a 'reasonable doubt' is a doubt for which a reason exists." 

### Kalebaugh, 183 Wn.2d at 584 (emphasis added). The court's opinion makes clear that while the trial court's oral remarks verged on an articulation 

### requirement, the language in WPIC 4.01 does not. See Kalebauqh, 183 Wn.2d at 584-86. Kalebaugh controls Gebretensae's arguments on appeal.

1See also State v. Emery. 174 Wn.2d 741, 759-60, 278 P.3d 653 (2012) (prosecutor's 

### argumentproperly described "reasonable doubt as a 'doubtforwhich areason exists'"); State v. Bennett. 161 Wn.2d 303, 307, 165 P.3d 1241 (2007); Statev. Tanzvmore. 54Wn.2d 290, 291 n.2, 340 P.2d 178 (1959).No. 72408-8-1/3
Affirmed.

We concur:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 73742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20424]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Page, 
Scrantom, Sprouse, Tucker & Ford, P.C on behalf of the Consolidated 
Government of Columbus, Georgia (WB24-45--9/4/24) for permission to use 
select data from the Board's 2022 unmasked Carload Waybill Samples. A 
copy of this request may be obtained from the Board's website under 
docket no. WB24-45.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics 
within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for 
release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Alexander Dusenberry, (202) 245-0319.

Eden Besera,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2024-20424 Filed 9-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
```
#### Toohey *v.*Simmons, Appellant; The Ohio State Life Ins. Co., Appellee.

(No. 28610

Decided June *4,*1941.)

*Mr. George 8. Hawke,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Matthews <& Matthews,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turnee., Williams, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.

Matthias, J., not participating.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2245 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2245

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 3, 2018

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To include New Zealand in the list of foreign states whose nationals 
   are eligible for admission into the United States as E-1 and E-2 
 nonimmigrants if United States nationals are treated similarly by the 
                       Government of New Zealand.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Knowledgeable Innovators and Worthy 
Investors Act'' or the ``KIWI Act''.

SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT TRADERS AND INVESTORS.

    For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii) of section 101(a)(15)(E) of 
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)), New 
Zealand shall be considered to be a foreign state described in such 
section if the Government of New Zealand provides similar nonimmigrant 
status to nationals of the United States.

            Passed the Senate June 28, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,450
<SECURITIES>                                    38,640
<RECEIVABLES>                                      465
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                        437
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,683
<PP&E>                                           5,414
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,654
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,574
<BONDS>                                            620
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,643
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,807
<SALES>                                          2,183
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,183
<CGS>                                            1,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,503
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    10
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 391
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,939)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,939)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,939)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.96)
        

</TABLE>