alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
23.1


CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






We have
issued our reports dated March 16, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and internal control over financial reporting included in
the Annual Report of Sterling Construction Company, Inc. on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said reports in the Registration Statement of Sterling Construction
Company, Inc. on Form S-3 (File no. 333-152371, effective July 16, 2008) and
Forms S-8 (File No. 33-83038, effective August 18, 1994, File
No. 33-83040, effective August 18, 1994, File No. 333-88224, effective
May 14, 2002, File No. 333-88228, effective May 14, 2002, File
No. 333-135666, effective July 10, 2006, and File No. 333-152371, effective
August 4, 2008).






/s/ GRANT
THORNTON LLP




Houston,
Texas


March 16,
2009




E4
Exhibit 99.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) |  | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 27, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: August 8, 2003 |  | /s/ John M.
Palumbo    
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | John M. Palumbo        
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7328

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DEAN BLACKWOOD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:09-cr-00135-RDB-1; 1:10-cv-01306-RDB; 1:10-cv-01645-RDB; 

1:10-cv-3609-RDB)

Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: March 5, 2012

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dean Blackwood, Appellant Pro Se. Mushtaq Zakir Gunja, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dean Blackwood seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders denying his motions for post-conviction relief under 28 

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011). We dismiss the appeal for 

lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely 

filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a 

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty 

days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or 

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007).

The district court’s orders were entered on the docket 

on December 9, 2010, and January 7, 2011. The notice of appeal 

was filed on September 29, 2011.

* Because Blackwood failed to 

file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or 

reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We also 

 

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 

(1988). 
3

deny Blackwood’s pending motions seeking the release of 

documents from the district court. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance





Exhibit 10.2




FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered
into as of this 21th day of August 2008, by and between CHROMADEX INC., a California
corporation (“Employer”), and THOMAS C VARVARO, an individual (“Employee”).



R E C I T A L S




A. On April 14, 2008, Employer and Employee entered into an Employment Agreement which
provides for the employment by Employer of Employee (the “Original Employment Agreement”).



B. Employer and Employee now desire to amend the Employment Agreement in certain respects
only, on the terms of this Amendment.



A G R E E M E N T




In consideration of the foregoing recitals and of the mutual covenants and conditions
contained herein, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree to amend the Employment
Agreement as follows:



1. The following paragraph is added to the Employment Agreement as Section 8(i) to the
Employment Agreement:



(i) Application of Section 409A — Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in this Agreement, solely to the extent that such delay is required in
order to avoid the imposition of an excise tax under Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), if Employee is a “specified
employee” for purposes of Section 409A(a)(2)(B) of the Code, any payments to be made
pursuant to this Agreement that are considered to be non-qualified deferred
compensation distributable in connection with the Employee’s separation from service
with Employer for purposes of Section 409A of the Code, and which otherwise would
have been payable at any time during the six-month period immediately following
Employee’s separation from service with Employer, shall not be paid prior to, and
shall instead be payable in a lump sum within ten (10) business days following the
end of such six-month period. The parties agree that in the event the Internal
Revenue Service issues additional guidance to the effect that any of the payments
provided for in this Agreement would not be in compliance with Section 409A of the
Code, the parties will negotiate in good faith to address such guidance so that such
payments are compliant with Section 409A of the Code to the extent reasonably
practicable.


 


 









 





2. This Amendment along with the Employment Agreement constitute the sole and entire
agreements of the parties relating to the subject matter contained therein. To the extent there is
any inconsistency between this Amendment and the Employment Agreement, the provisions of this
Amendment shall be controlling.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth
above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	“EMPLOYER”:	 	 	 	“EMPLOYEE”:
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	CHROMADEX, INC.,	 	 	 	 
	a California corporation	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
	/s/ Frank Jaksch	 	 	 	/s/ Thomas C Varvaro
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	Its:	 	 	 	 	 	THOMAS C VARVARO
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 







 


2
EXHIBIT 21.01

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                              GENELABS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                     LIST OF REGISTRANT'S SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES


                                                                                  PERCENT OWNED BY
                                                     STATE OR COUNTRY OF             GENELABS
                            NAME                         ORGANIZATION           TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
-------------------------------------------------    ---------------------     ----------------------
<S>                                                   <C>                              <C>
Accelerated Clinical Research Organization, Inc.           Delaware                    100%
Genelabs Asia (Pte.) Ltd.                                 Singapore                    100%*
Genelabs Diagnostic, Inc.                                  Delaware                    100%
Genelabs Diagnostics (Pte.) Ltd.                          Singapore                    100% **
Genelabs Europe B.V.                                     Netherlands                   100%

--------------------------------

         *   Wholly-owned by Genelabs Diagnostic, Inc.

         **  Wholly-owned by Genelabs Asia (Pte.) Ltd.
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Netopia, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Mark H. Perry, as Interim Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | i. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Mark H. PerryMark H. Perry Interim Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)Date: February 9, 2005
- 1 - Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

September 30, 2011

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Joint Application of Delta, Korean, and Mesaba

For a Statement of Authorization

Docket DOT-OST-2003-14367

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, we urge that the application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: William Callaway, Jr., Counsel to Korean Jonathon Foglia, Counsel to Korean Megan Rosia, Counsel to Mesaba
info@airlineinfo.com
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2040 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2040

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  621 Kansas Avenue in Atchison, Kansas, as the ``Amelia Earhart Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. AMELIA EARHART POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 621 Kansas Avenue in Atchison, Kansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Amelia Earhart Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Amelia 
Earhart Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2366 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2366

   To provide an adjustment to the discretionary spending limits for 
             appropriations for the 2020 decennial census.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 5, 2018

Mr. Booker (for himself and Mr. Schatz) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide an adjustment to the discretionary spending limits for 
             appropriations for the 2020 decennial census.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Census Funding Cap Adjustment Act of 
2018''.

SEC. 2. BUDGET CAP EXEMPTION FOR CENSUS FUNDING.

    Section 251(b)(2) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901(b)(2)) is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
                    ``(E) Decennial census during 2020.--If a bill or 
                joint resolution making appropriations for a fiscal 
                year is enacted that specifies an amount of new budget 
                authority for the decennial census to be conducted 
                during 2020, then the adjustment for that fiscal year 
                shall be the amount by which the new budget authority 
                provided in that Act for that purpose exceeds 
                $70,000,000.''.
                                 <all>
```
VI 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1760 

For the relief of Marco Antonio Reyes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2017 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Marco Antonio Reyes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MARCO 

4 ANTONIO REYES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Marco Antonio Reyes shall be eligi8 ble for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 

9 of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for perma10 nent residence upon filing an application for issuance of 

11 an immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act (8 


dlhill on DSKBC4BHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1760 IS

1 U.S.C. 1154) or for adjustment of status to lawful perma2 nent resident. 

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Marco Antonio 

4 Reyes enters the United States before the filing deadline 

5 specified in subsection (c), Marco Antonio Reyes shall be 

6 considered to have entered and remained lawfully in the 

7 United States and shall be eligible for adjustment of sta8 tus under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality 

9 Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of the enactment of 

10 this Act. 

11 (c) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub12 sections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for 

13 the issuance of an immigrant visa or the application for 

14 adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees not 

15 later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this 

16 Act. 

17 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

18 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res19 idence to Marco Antonio Reyes, the Secretary of State 

20 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 

21 current or next following fiscal year— 

22 (1) the total number of immigrant visas that 

23 are made available to natives of the country of birth 

24 of Marco Antonio Reyes under section 203(a) of the 


dlhill on DSKBC4BHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1760 IS

1 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

2 1153(a)); or 

3 (2) if applicable, the total number of immigrant 

4 visas that are made available to natives of the coun5 try of birth of Marco Antonio Reyes under section 

6 202(e) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)). 

7 (e) PAYGO.—The budgetary effects of this Act, for 

8 the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You9 Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the 

10 latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 

11 Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 

12 Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Committee 

13 on the Budget of the Senate, provided that such statement 

14 has been submitted prior to the vote on passage. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSKBC4BHB2PROD with BILLS
First Amendment of the 6 Supply Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED 
 BY RUBICON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 6” SUPPLY AGREEMENT* 
 by and between 
 PEREGRINE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION 
 and 
 RUBICON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 
 This First Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the 6” Supply Agreement dated as of March 26, 2007 (the “Agreement”) by and between Peregrine Semiconductor Corp.
(“Peregrine”) and Rubicon Technology, Inc. (“Rubicon”) is effective as of August 22, 2008 (the “Effective Date”). 
 RECITALS: 
  

	 	A.	Peregrine and Rubicon are parties to the “Agreement”, providing for the purchase and sale of Products, as defined therein. 

  

	 	B.	Peregrine has requested Rubicon to reduce shipment volumes in 2008 as defined in Attachment A of the Agreement and has requested to shift the volume of wafers not shipped in 2008 to
early 2009. 

 Now, therefore, in consideration of Rubicon’s interest in accommodating Peregrine to foster a long term supply
relationship, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Peregrine and Rubicon agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Definitions. Unless otherwise expressly provided in this Amendment, each capitalized term used in this Amendment has the same meaning as in the Agreement.


  

	 	2.	Shipment Volume Rubicon will reduce shipments to [***] wafers per month in August 2008 through December 2008. To date in 2008, Rubicon has already held back [***] wafers from
shipment to Peregrine at Peregrine’s request. In total, Rubicon will reduce 6” wafer shipments to Peregrine by [***] units in 2008 and shift these wafers shipments to Q1and Q2 2009. Rubicon will ship these wafers to Peregrine at the Q4
2008 Supply Agreement pricing in the following monthly volumes in Q1/Q2 2009: 

  

			
	Jan 2009	  	[***] wafers
	Feb 2009	  	[***] wafers
	Mar 2009	  	[***] wafers
	Apr 2009	  	[***] wafers
	May 2009	  	[***] wafers
	Jun 2009	  	[***] wafers

  

			
	* [***]:	  	Certain information in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted
portions.








 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED 
 BY RUBICON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 
  

	 	3.	No Other Changes Except as is expressly provided in this Amendment, the Agreement is not amended or revised in any way and remains in full force and effect.


 The parties have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Amendment as of the Effective Date.

 Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation 
 9380 Carroll Park
Drive, San Diego, CA 92121 
 TEL: 858-731-9451            FAX: 858-731-9499 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/    Jim Cable

		 	Jim Cable, CEO

 Rubicon Technology, Inc. 
 9931 Franklin Avenue, Franklin Park, Illinois 60131 
 TEL:
847-295-7000            FAX: 847-233-0177 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/    Raja Parvez

		 	Raja Parvez, CEO

  

 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 236 (Thursday, December 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 76655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31211]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel, Fact CT-MR Registration For Image Guided Procedures.
    Date: December 19, 2000.
    Time: 2 pm to 3 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Library of Medicine, Division of Extramural 
Programs, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Milton Corn, MD, Associate Director, Office of 
Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, Rockledge One, 
Suite 301, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: November 28, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-31211 Filed 12-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# Rupprecht Law P. A.
2811 Grande Parkway, Suite 113 | Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 P: (561) 222

- 6979 | E: jon@jrupprechtlaw.com | W: www.jrupprechtlaw.com

October 26 , 2015 U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140, Washington, DC 20590

RE: Receipt of t he Confidential ly Submitted Documents for Flyspan Systems, Inc. (Docket FAA

- 2015

- 4148 )
Dear Sir or Madam: Flyspan Systems, Inc. ’ s manuals were confidentially submitted to 333exemptions@faa.gov on October 15 , 2015 and a receipt was returned on October 19 , 2015. The confidential submission included:

1 ) Flight Operations & Procedures Manual (FOPM)
2) Aircraft Flight Manual

- DJI Phantom 3
If I can be of any assistance to further expedite this petition, please do not hesitate to contact me at (561)222

- 6979 or at my email jon@jrupprechtlaw.com

Sincerely yours,

_____________________ Jonathan Rupprecht, Esq.