alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 Docket Nos.Liberty 1 Solar, LLC
EG24-198-000Callisto I Energy Center LLC
EG24-199-000Goose Prairie Solar LLC
EG24-201-000SEPV Sierra, LLC
EG24-202-000SEPV Cuyama, LLC
EG24-203-000CED Westside Canal Battery Storage, LLC
EG24-204-000PP Jaguar BESS LLC
EG24-205-000FRP Gilchrist County Solar, LLC
EG24-206-000FRP Columbia County Solar, LLC
EG24-207-000FRP Gadsden County Solar, LLC
EG24-208-000Calhoun County Solar Project, LLC
EG24-209-000Millers Branch Solar, LLC
EG24-210-000FRP Tupelo Solar, LLC
EG24-211-000Harmony Florida Solar II, LLC
EG24-212-000Storey Bend Solar, LLC
EG24-213-000VESI 12 LLC
EG24-214-000BRP Antlia BESS LLC
EG24-215-000BRP Carina BESS LLC
EG24-216-000Chillingham Solar LLC
EG24-217-000Shamrock Energy Storage, LLC
EG24-218-000Eoliennes Offshore des Hautes Falaises SAS
FC24-3-000
 Take notice that during the month of August 2024, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a) (2023). Dated: September 4, 2024. Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Acting Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2024-20409 Filed 9-9-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### DRAPER v. STATE.

No. 20904.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 6, 1940.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The offense is drunkenness in a public place; punishment, a fine of $10.

The record before us fails to disclose that notice of appeal was given and entered upon the minutes of the court below. In the absence of such a showing this court is without jurisdiction to determine the matters presented for review. Art. 827, C.C.P.

.The appeal is dismissed.
#### The State, ex rel. The City Savings & Loan Co., Appellee, *v.*City of Lakewood et al., Appellants.

(No. 28581

Decided June 4, 1941.)

*482
      *Mr. Andrew Pangrace,*for appellee.

*Mr. Charles F. Ross,*for appellants.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.

Matthias, J., not participating.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

ANHAM FZCO ) ASBCA No. 59283

)

Under Contract No. SPM300

- 10

- D

- 3373 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Kirsten W. Konar

, Esq.

Vedder Price P.C.

Chicago, IL

Kelly E. Buroker

, Esq.

Tamara Droubi

, Esq.

Kyle E. Gilbertson, Esq.

Jeffrey M. Lowry

, Esq.

Vedder Price P.C.

Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

DLA Chief Trial Attorney

J. Maxwell Carrion, Esq.

Katherine B. McCulloch

, Esq.

Steven C. Herrera, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

DLA Troop Support

Philadelphia, PA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: July 22 , 2021

KENNETH D. WOODROW

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals2 I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59283

, Appeal of ANHAM FZCO,

rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: July 22, 2021

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          41,861
<SECURITIES>                                    20,016
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                       934
<INVENTORY>                                      7,075
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,733
<PP&E>                                          15,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,738)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,901
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                     115,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,881
<SALES>                                         28,515
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,515
<CGS>                                           15,683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,453
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (943)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (678)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (678)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,334
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       656
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-01-1999
<CASH>                                          11,356
<SECURITIES>                                    11,120
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                       160
<INVENTORY>                                      1,144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,117
<PP&E>                                           9,206
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,509
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,859
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,799
<SALES>                                          3,244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,244
<CGS>                                            2,927
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,347
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  48
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,434)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,434)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,434)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.44)


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATIONS

I, James B. Hovis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Phlo Corporation and
Subsidiaries;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 28, 2005


                        /s/ James B. Hovis
                        -------------------------------------------
                        James B. Hovis
                        Chief Executive Officer
                        Principal Financial Officer


                                       14
<PAGE>   1
                                                             Exhibit 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Value City Department Stores, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-44207, 33-50198,
33-55348, 33-55350, 33- 78586, 33-80588, 33-92966, 333-15957, 333-15961 and
333-66239) of our report dated March 23, 1999, appearing in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Value City Department Stores, Inc. for the six month
period ended January 30, 1999.



                                                          Deloitte & Touche  LLP



Columbus, Ohio
April 29, 1999
#### Nichter Road/Cemetery Road Homeowners Association, Respondent, v Stanley J. Keysa et al., Constituting the Town Board of the Town of Lancaster, Defendants, and Richard L. Church, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Roberts, J.H.O. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Roberts, J.H.O.—declaratory judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 !! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 "! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 #! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 $! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 %! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 &! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 '! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 (! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 )! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 !! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 "! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 #! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 $! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 %! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 &! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 '! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 (! " # % & ' ( & ) ' * + , - . / & 0 1 & 2 3

, # 3 ! )
#### Iden *v.*Atkinson, Admr. of Bureau of Unemployment Compensation.

(No. 28442

Decided April 30, 1941.)

*176
      *Messrs. Pugh, Knapp & Miller,*for plaintiff.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. John M. Woy,*for defendant.

Weygandt, C. J.

The sole question raised by the defendant at this time is whether the plaintiff’s petition contains facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for the issuance of a writ of prohibition.

The plaintiff states that he has invoked this extraordinary remedy because he is in doubt whether he can otherwise contest the validity of the contribution levied by the defendant under favor of Section 1346-4, General Code, which in part provides that “Except as herein provided, any decision made by the administrator or a deputy of the administrator by the board of review or one of its referees shall be final.” But conceding without determining the finality of such an order so far as a review by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review is concerned, it still is nec*177essary to consider the effect of the further procedures provided by Sections 1345-27 and 1345-28, General Code. The first authorizes a criminal and the second a civil action against an employer who fails or refuses to pay any contribution levied against him. However, this plaintiff urges that these procedures would not enable him to interpose his defense, and that even if such a defense were permitted, the remedy would prove inadequate. With these views this court finds itself unable to agree. In the first place it is possible that no court action ever will be filed against this plaintiff, thus leaving him unharmed. Secondly, if an action should be instituted against him he could assert his defense that the individuals in question are not employees. This is illustrated by the language of Section 1345-28, General Code, that “If upon final hearing of said cause it is found and determined that the defendant is subject to the provisions of this act, the court shall render judgment * * Thus the question whether this plaintiff is an employer of three or more individuals can be effectively adjudicated in a court of law. *Pittsburg Coal Co.*v. *Industrial Commission,*108 Ohio St., 185, 140 N. E., 684.

The plaintiff places considerable reliance upon the case of *Bowman*v. *Atkinson, Admr. of Unemployment Comp. Comm.,*136 Ohio St., 495, 26 N. E. (2d), 798. However, a study of that case shows that the question of remedy was not raised, considered or decided, and that the Attorney General agreed in open court that the writ should issue.

In the instant case the demurrer must be sustained and the petition dismissed at the plaintiff’s costs.

*Demurrer sustained.*

Turner, Williams, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.

Matthias, J., not participating.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40173 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MARIO GERARDO FLORES

- HERNANDEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:14

- CR

- 229

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Gerardo
Flores

- Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores

- Hernandez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 2 2 , 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40173 Document: 00513243344 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015No. 15

- 40173

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, coun sel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-40173 Document: 00513243344 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
**Exhibit32.1**

 

RAG SHOPS, INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

Theundersigned, Stephen G. Marble, the Acting Chief Executive Officer of RagShops, Inc. (the “Company”), has executed this Certification in connection withthe filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended August 30, 2003 (the “Report”).

 

Theundersigned hereby certifies that:

 

•      The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•      the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESSWHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of the 8thday of February, 2005.

 
|   | /s/ Stephen G. Marble           |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   | Acting  Chief Executive Officer |

 

E-5

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's unaudited consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 1997,
and the six months then ended, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001011991
<NAME> SUSA PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,469
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,057
<PP&E>                                       1,025,081
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,251
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,021,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,007
<BONDS>                                        242,561
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       675,212
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,107
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,021,887
<SALES>                                         37,865
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,651
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,745)<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,223
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,223
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,223
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
<FN>
<F1>Included in other expenses are minority interest expense, gain on
exchange of self-storage facilities and interest income.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
• 

South Coast 

Air Quality Management District ~J....,. 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 

r~ :!~J (909) 396-2000 • www.aqmd.gov 

Ms. Carol Sutk:us, Manager 

South Coast Air Quality Planning 

Air Resources Board 

1 001 I Street 

P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, CA 95812 

August 14, 2014 

Re: SIP Submittal: Rule 2449- Control of Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions from Off-Road 

Diesel Vehicles 

Dear Ms. Sutkus: 

Attached you will find information pertaining to Rule 2449 which was amended by the South 

Coast Air Quality Management District Governing Board on July, 11, 2014. 

Because these rules are economic incentive type rules or replace emission limits, the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency has requested that we submit them for inclusion in the State 

Implementation Plan. 

We are requesting that upon your review and concurrence the attached information be provided to 

U.S. EPA for its review and inclusion in the SIP. 

If you have any questions on this submittal, please contact Randall Pasek at (909) 396-2251. 

EC:RP:AO:FM 

Attachments: 

SrP Completeness Checklist 

APCDI AQMD Rule Evaluation Form 

Clean Copy of Amended Rule 

Strikeout Copy of Amended Rule 

Proof of Publication 

Signed Board Resolution 

Staff Report 

Sincerely, 

' 

Elaine Chang, DrPH 

Deputy Executive Officer 

Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources 

cc: Andrew Steckel/U.S. EPA Region IX (w/o attachments) 

Mary Leonard/SCAQMD (w/o attachments) 

Randall Pasek/SCAQMD (w/o attachments) 

Adewale Oshinuga/SCAQMD (w/o attachments) 

SIP File (w/attachments) 

Cleaning the air that •ve breathe ...
Order entered August 2 8 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00439
- CV QBE AMERICAS, INC. AND SONIA DIAZ, Appellant s V. DEYLAN WALKER, Appellee On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 19
- 14300

ORDER Before the Court is appellee’s August 26, 2020 second motion for extension of time to file his brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no lat er than September 28, 2020. Because this is an accelerated appeal and appellants’ brief was filed May 6, 2020, we caution appellee that further extensions will not be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE