alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **2 -**  **6380**

JOHNATHAN LEE X SMITH , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. GENE M. JOHNSON, Director , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. James R. Spencer , District Judge. ( 3:09

- cv - 00653

- JRS )

Submitted : May 3 1, 2012 Decided: June 20, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Johnathan Lee X Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Johnathan Lee X Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the pri soner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude th at Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 prese nted in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### WHITE v. STATE.

No. 20685.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 25, 1939.

Fred H. Woodard, of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is an assault with intent to murder. The punishment assessed is *404confinement in the state-’ penitentiary for a term of three years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The' judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the. Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeal's and approved by the Court.
Docket No. FAA-2015-8431 Dir. ID 2015-NM-128-AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Transport Canada Robert Farinas 7/27/2015 No Objection

Bombardier

Aerospace

Grant Walker 7/27/2015 No Objection

Regional Airline

Association

Stacey Bechdolt 7/27/2015 No Objection
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

                                                
       
<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                          5,226
<SECURITIES>                                                   37,838
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  13,260
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      941
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               56,405
<PP&E>                                                          9,640   
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  4,886   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 61,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          10,645
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                          121
<OTHER-SE>                                                     50,149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   61,959
<SALES>                                                        67,395
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               67,395
<CGS>                                                          37,828
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  57,036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                11,703
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    1,008
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            10,695
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   10,695
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.89
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2194 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2194

    To remove a limitation on a prohibition relating to permits for 
         discharges incidental to normal operation of vessels.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 5, 2017

  Ms. Cantwell (for herself and Mr. Nelson) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To remove a limitation on a prohibition relating to permits for 
         discharges incidental to normal operation of vessels.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fishing and Small Vessel Relief 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS.

    Section 2(a) of Public Law 110-299 (33 U.S.C. 1342 note) is amended 
by striking ``December 18, 2017'' and inserting ``December 18, 2020''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q  of  CollaGenex
Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned,  Brian M. Gallagher,  Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and Nancy C. Broadbent,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  CollaGenex  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.  and will be  retained by
CollaGenex  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc. and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



                                 /s/ Brian M. Gallagher, Ph.D.
                                 ----------------------------------------
Dated:   May 15, 2003            Brian M. Gallagher, Ph.D.
                                 Chief Executive Officer



                                 /s/ Nancy C. Broadbent
                                 --------------------------------------------
Dated:    May 15, 2003           Nancy C. Broadbent
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 11
                            THERMO OPTEK CORPORATION

                        Computation of Earnings per Share


                                                     Three Months Ended
                                              -------------------------------
                                               March 29,           March 30,
                                                    1997                1996
   --------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Computation of Primary Earnings per Share:

   Net Income (a)                            $ 6,749,000         $ 4,296,000
                                             -----------         -----------

   Shares:
     Weighted average shares outstanding      48,450,000          45,000,000

     Add: Shares issuable from
          assumed exercise of options
          (as determined by the
          application of the treasury
          stock method)                                -             157,040
                                             -----------         -----------

     Weighted average shares outstanding,
       as adjusted (b)                        48,450,000          45,157,040
                                             -----------         -----------

   Primary Earnings per Share (a) / (b)      $       .14         $       .10
                                             ===========         ===========
EXHIBIT
10.10




[State
Inspections of Texas, Inc. Letterhead]


 

March 31,
2005




Mr. Rich
Parlontieri

President,
CEO

Speedemissions,
Inc.

1029
Peachtree Parkway North

Suite
310

Peachtree
City, GA 30269





		RE:	Outstanding
      Indebtedness of Speedemissions, Inc.






Dear
Rich:




This
letter confirms that State Inspections of Texas, Inc. (the “Company”) has agreed
to extend the date that payments are to begin under the $36,000 Secured
Promissory Note dated December 1, 2004 (the “Note”), until August 1, 2005.
Payment dates shall be carried forward from that date. By execution of this
letter, the Company does not waive any of its rights under any other related
transaction documents.







Sincerely,

 

 

/s/ Debra
Price








Debra Price










Agreed
and Accepted this

31st day
of March, 2005


 

By: 
/s/ Richard Parlontieri






Name:
Rich Parlontieri

Title:
President and CEO
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our reports dated
March 14, 2011, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Gulfport Energy Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Gulfport Energy Corporation on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-135728, effective July 12, 2006; File No. 333-129178, effective October 21, 2005;
and File No. 333-55738, effective February 16, 2001) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-168180, effective July 28, 2010).



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
|                      
|Oklahoma City, OK     
|March 14, 2011
March 10, 2015 

Mr. Shane J. Renard 

1203 Kellogg Street 

Green Bay WI 54303 

Dear Mr. Renard: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request 

We entered your February 10, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA2015-0336), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent 

does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the 

request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,005                   1,761
<SECURITIES>                                     2,775                   4,619
<RECEIVABLES>                                      248                   1,305
<ALLOWANCES>                                        57                     555
<INVENTORY>                                          0                     584
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,090                   7,834
<PP&E>                                           1,158                   1,006
<DEPRECIATION>                                     582                     505
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,710                   8,867
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,175                     949
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            83                      82
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,452                   7,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,710                   8,867
<SALES>                                              2                   1,127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   156                   1,673
<CGS>                                                1                   1,417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       98                   1,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,632                   9,551
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                 (9,270)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,562)                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,562)                 (9,270)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.43)                  (1.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
December 19, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DANIEL BRANDON LYLE , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00748

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this c ourt holds that there was no error in the judgment. The c ourt orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Star Multi Care Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
Schoenberg, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report containing the financial statements for the Company fully
            complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
            Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                      By /s/ David Schoenberg
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                             David Schoenberg
                                             Secretary and
                                             Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                                      2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of EP MedSystems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
         the Company


Date:  November 12, 2004                   /s/ Reinhard Schmidt
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Reinhard Schmidt
                                               President and Chief Executive
                                               Officer
                                               (Principal Executive Officer)
"richardastrust.com" <richard@astrust.com> 07/04/2007 10:13 PM To Margaret Sheppard/DC/USEPA/US@EPA cc bcc Subject white goods

History:

This message has been replied to and forwarded. Dear Margaret: My intention for HCR188C is to be used in new refrigerators and new home air conditioners units.To retrofit a refrigerator or AC h ome unit is not feasible because of cost. The normal home window unit 12000 BTU is around $200.00 and the normal

- sized refrigerator is a pprox $500.00. Whenever one fails, it is cheaper to bu y a new one and not fix it. I guess I did not clarify

this. Most of the exposure of HCR188c would be at a factory when they charge the new s ys tem. If there is a failure or warranty , they would just discard it and the store would replace it with a new one. The old one is scrapped. Scrap yards just recy cle the unit by removing the refrigerant and sell it as propane for the barbecue grill. It would be easier to blend the refrigerant from new hydrocarbons. I have used a Robin air EPA
- approved reclaimer for HCR188c which has an oil
- separator which separates the compressor oil from HCR188C and recy cles HCR188C back i nto a canister. I found it much more effective using the recycled refrigerant in a BBQ charcoal burner. It can be reused as a refrigerant but my own personal feeling is that it is such a small amount and that part of the blend might get lost in the process so I would rather have a brand new blend in an air conditioner. Although I've used it over and over many times, the barbecue grill was the best. At Cortland, New York while testing m y refrigerant at Intertek in February of this ye ar, I did ask Rob Hill about a reclaimer for Hy drocarbon Refrigerant, All he told me was that there was no compan y that he knows is doing it since the EPA has not approved it as an Alternative Refrigerant.I will ask him again in writing and get his response.

If this is part of a satisfactory explanation then I will get the rest of the clarification to y ou in a formal letter. Thank y ou Richard
EXHIBIT 11

                     JONES APPAREL GROUP, INC.

       Computation of Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share
             (In thousands except per share amounts)


                                         For the Year Ended December 31,
                                        --------------------------------
                                            1999        1998        1997<F1>
                                        --------    --------     -------
Basic Earnings per Share:
-------------------------
Net income...........................   $188,419    $154,864    $121,725
                                        ========    ========     =======

Weighted average number of shares
outstanding..........................    114,113     101,614     103,797
                                        ========    ========     =======

Basic earnings per share.............      $1.65       $1.52       $1.17
                                        ========    ========     =======


Diluted Earnings per Share:
---------------------------
Net income...........................   $188,419    $154,864    $121,725
                                        ========    ========     =======

Weighted average number of shares
outstanding..........................    114,113     101,614     103,797

Assumed issuances under exercise
of stock options.....................      3,890       3,514       4,013
                                        --------    --------     -------

                                         118,003     105,128     107,810
                                        ========    ========     =======

Diluted earnings per share...........      $1.60       $1.47       $1.13
                                        ========    ========     =======

<F1> Adjusted for 2-for-1 stock split effective June 25, 1998.