alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12511]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in the exhibition “Solid Gold” at the Brooklyn Museum, Brooklyn, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Scott D. Weinhold,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2024-20234 Filed 9-6-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Exhibit 10.4.2

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
ANNTAYLOR STORES CORPORATION2000 STOCK OPTION AND
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD PLAN

The
AnnTaylor Stores Corporation 2000 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Award Plan (the
Plan) is hereby amended effective as of March 9, 2004 (the Effective
Date) as set forth below.

1.       
          The second sentence of Section 6(f) of the Plan is hereby amended in its
          entirety to read as follows, effective with respect to all Options (as defined
          in the Plan) granted pursuant to the Plan, including outstanding Options granted
          before the Effective Date:

| | In
the event that the employment or service of an Optionee shall terminate or cease other
than by reason of death, Disability or Retirement, all Options theretofore granted to such
Optionee that are exercisable at the time of such termination may, to the extent not
theretofore exercised or canceled, be exercised at any time within three (3) months after
such termination of employment or cessation of service, as applicable; provided, however,
that the Committee may in its discretion extend the period for exercise of such Options to
a date later than three (3) months after such separation or cessation date, but in any
event not beyond the date on which the Option would otherwise expire pursuant to Section
6(e) hereof; provided, further, that if the employment of an Optionee shall terminate for
Cause, all Options theretofore granted to such Optionee shall, to the extent not
theretofore exercised, forthwith terminate immediately upon termination.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Except
as set forth above, the Plan is hereby ratified and affirmed in all respects.
[No. 35317.

Department Two.

January 19, 1961.]

#### Herrett Trucking Company, Inc., *Appellant,*v. J. D. Hamilton Fruit Company, *Respondent.**1*

*Boose & Garrison*and *Roger K. Garrison,*for appellant.

*Whitmore & Whitmore*and *David J. Whitmore,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 358 P. (2d) 554.

Finley, C. J.

— In this lawsuit the appellant trucking company alleges that it (1) performed services for the respondent, J. D. Hamilton Fruit Company, and (2) seeks to obtain a money judgment against respondent for the services allegedly performed.

The evidence clearly establishes that certain trucking services were in fact performed by appellant. However, the crucial question is whether the appellant performed the trucking services for respondent or for other business entities (with somewhat similar trade names) operating in the Columbia Basin area.

The trial court determined that there was no evidence or reasonable inference therefrom to support appellant’s allegation of a carrier-shipper relationship, and liability in this connection, on the part of respondent. Judgment was entered dismissing appellant’s action with prejudice.

We find no reason to disturb the judgment of the trial court. It is hereby ordered, that the judgment be affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Weaver', Hill, Rosellini, and Foster, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000872588                            
<NAME>                        Las Vegas Entertainment Network                  

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Oct-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Oct-31-1996

<CASH>                                         10,385,292
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,385,292
<PP&E>                                         352,378
<DEPRECIATION>                                 180,981
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 18,478,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,949,062
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                      34,895
<OTHER-SE>                                    47,280,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  18,478,260
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               291,200
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,007,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             537,081
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,740,459)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,740,459)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  $(0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(0.14)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-KSB
YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 1999 AND QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          16,843
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,883,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 12,089,769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,223
<PP&E>                                         950,753
<DEPRECIATION>                                 595,321
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,588,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,703,150
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 20,000,000
<COMMON>                                        97,124
<OTHER-SE>                                  (8,212,241)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,588,033
<SALES>                                     15,325,448
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,325,448
<CGS>                                        8,050,308
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,050,308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (4,482)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             283,549
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,331,201
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,331,201
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,331,201
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Order entered September 21, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00243-CV

COLLEEN MARIE FISHER, Appellant

V.

PAUL M. COOKE, SR., Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-05882

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 20, 2021 motion for extension of 

time to correct and file her brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief 

received on September 20 filed as of the date of this order. We DENY appellant’s 

September 14, 2021 extension motion as moot.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       5,796,555
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,950,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  6,819,775
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      14,313,141
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        14,649,141
<LOANS>                                     83,551,448
<ALLOWANCE>                                  (713,116)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             117,281,195
<DEPOSITS>                                 107,680,002
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            569,993
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,849,710
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,181,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             117,281,195
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,858,393
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              904,517
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               194,968
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,957,878
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,727,039
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,727,039
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,230,839
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  237,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (2,117)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,574,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                656,664
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     656,664
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   431,540
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                     41,099
<LOANS-PAST>                                   290,940
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               527,014
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   53,879
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,976
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              713,116
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                (1)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### In Matter of Estate of Johnson: Morgan, Trustee, Appellee, *v.*The Fidelity & Casualty Co., Appellant.

(No. 28525

Decided March 12, 1941.)

*Messrs. Baker, Hostetler & Patterson, Mr. Howard P. Burns*and *Mr. Lockwood Thompson,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Howell, Roberts & Duncan,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart and Bettman, JJ., concur.
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 21

- 50451 Summary Calendar

United States of America,
Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus
Timothy Marquardt,
Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:16

- CR

- 59

- 1

Before Southwick, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : * Timothy Marquardt, federal prisoner # 70526

- 380, appeals the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release . We review the denial, which the district court based upon Marquardt’s failure to

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 13, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-50451 Document: 00516354452 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/13/2022No. 21

- 50451

2 show extraordinary and compelling re asons, for an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Chambliss , 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020)

. Insofar as Marquardt raises claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, he fails to show that the district court err ed as a matter of law by holding that the § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion was not a viable substitute for a timely filed 28 U.S.C § 2255 motion. See id. Marquardt’s claim invoking Rehaif v. United States , 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019) , is insufficiently briefed to warr ant our consideration. See United States v. Scroggins , 599 F.3d 433, 446

- 47 (5th Cir. 2010)

. We do not address any argument regarding the sentencing factors of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Jackson , 27 F.4th 1088, 1093 n.8 (5th Cir. 2022).

A FFIRMED

. Case: 21-50451 Document: 00516354452 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/13/2022
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Travis Boats & Motors,
Inc. (the  "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark T.
Walton,  President of the Company,  certify,  to my best  knowledge  and belief,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:  (1) The  Report  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C.  78m(a) or 78o(d));  and (2) The information  contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

/s/ Mark T. Walton
Mark T. Walton, President
February 20, 2004
ft United States Environmental Protection 

'' Agency 

Affiliation 

1 

• 

--------------------------------------------------------

Telephone ________________________________________________________ 

Email 

Would you like to be added to our mailing list? D Yes D No
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2428 

To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to exempt certain small entities 

dealing in foreign exchange that serve small- and medium-sized businesses from certain capital and margin requirements, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2018 

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to exempt certain 

small entities dealing in foreign exchange that serve 

small- and medium-sized businesses from certain capital 

and margin requirements, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY OF CAPITAL AND MARGIN RE4 QUIREMENTS TO COUNTERPARTIES. 

5 Section 4s(e)(4) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 

6 U.S.C. 6s(e)(4)) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘counterparty qualifies’’ and in8 serting the following: ‘‘counterparty— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2428 IS

1 ‘‘(A) qualifies’’; 

2 (2) in subparagraph (A) (as so designated), by 

3 striking the period at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; 

4 and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(B)(i) is a money transmitter (as defined 

7 in section 1010.100(ff)(5) of title 31, Code of 

8 Federal Regulations) (or any successor regula9 tion)) that— 

10 ‘‘(I) is regulated by a State, the Dis11 trict of Columbia, or a territory or posses12 sion of the United States for financial ade13 quacy; 

14 ‘‘(II) is registered in accordance with 

15 section 1022.380 of title 31, Code of Fed16 eral Regulations (or any successor regula17 tion); and 

18 ‘‘(III) enters only into swaps exclu19 sively for the purpose of offsetting risks 

20 generated from foreign currency contracts 

21 with an entity that is not a financial end 

22 user (as defined in section 23.151 of title 

23 17, Code of Federal Regulations (or any 

24 successor regulation)); and 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2428 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) has total assets of $1,000,000,000 or 

2 less on the last day of its most recent fiscal 

3 year.’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
MESABAAIRLINES 

June 28, 2011 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

Re: EAS at Muscle Shoals, Alabama 

Docket DOT -OST -2000-7856 

i 1: 3 CJ 

To the extent necessary, Pinnacle Airlines, Inc. ("Pinnacle") and Mesaba Aviation, Inc., 

d/b/a Mesaba Airlines, Inc. ("Mesaba") jointly request that either carrier be deemed 

eligible to receive the EAS compensation established by Order 2011-1-24. Pinnacle and 

Mesaba are now both wholly owned subsidiaries of the holding corporation, Pinnacle 

Airlines, Corp. Both carriers currently operate and will continue to operate as "Delta 

Connection" carriers. 

Flights operated by Mesaba would use Saab 340 aircraft, and flights operated by 

Pinnacle would use 50 seat CRJ200 Regional Jet Aircraft. Mesaba and Pinnacle seek 

to provide EAS service on an interim basis pursuant to the rates established by Order 

2011-1-24, and without prejudice to their ability to seek new EAS rates for CRJ200 

service once the longer term fleet plans of the respective carriers are established. 

The community of Muscle Shoals has indicated that it supports this request. 

Sincerely, 

ec&;~'-~ Maximillian T. Shemesh 

General Counsel 

Mesaba Aviation, Inc. 

651-367-5218 

Max. Shemesh@mesaba.com 

cc: mayor@hiwaay.net 

matthewhea@gmail.com 

1000 BLUE GENTIAN ROAD, SUITE 200, EAGAN, MN 55121-1679