73628 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2024 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 89 

FR 35073 (May 1, 2024). 

2See Laminated Woven Sacks from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty and 

Countervailing Duty Orders, 84 FR 753 (June 4, 

2019) (Order). 

3The domestic interested parties are Polytex 

Fiber LLC and ProAmpac Holdings Inc. 

4See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, 

‘‘Domestic Interested Party Notice Of Intent To 

Participate,’’ dated May 10, 2024. 

5See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, 

‘‘Domestic Interested Party Substantive Response,’’ 

dated May 30, 2024 (Substantive Response). 

6 Id. 

7See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

initiated on May 1, 2023,’’ dated June 21, 2024. 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Final Results of the First Expedited Sunset 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on 

Laminated Woven Sacks from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

9 Id. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited 

sunset review, the U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

(AD) order on Laminated Woven Sacks 

(LWS) from the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam (Vietnam) would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final 

Results of the Sunset Review’’ section of 

this notice. 

DATES: Applicable September 11, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Luke Caruso, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2081. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

After Commerce initiated the sunset 

review 1 of the Order,2 pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act), domestic 

interested parties 3 timely submitted 

complete notices of intent to participate 

in,4 and adequate substantive responses 

regarding, the review.5 The domestic 

interested parties claimed domestic 

interested party status under section 

771(9)(C) of the Act as producers of the 

domestic like product in the United 

States.6 Commerce did not receive a 

substantive response from any 

respondent interested party, nor was a 

hearing requested. On June 21, 2024, 

Commerce notified the U.S. 

International Trade Commission that it 

did not receive adequate substantive 

responses from respondent interested 

parties.7 As a result, pursuant to section 

751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is laminated woven sacks. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.8

Analysis of Comments Received 

A complete discussion of all issues 

raised in this sunset review is contained 

in the accompanying Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.9 A list of topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be directly accessed 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the Order 

would likely lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping, and that the 

magnitude of the dumping margins 

likely to prevail are weighted-average 

margins up to a weighted-average 

margin of up to 292.61 percent. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of sunset review in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(5)(ii). 

Dated: September 5, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of Dumping 

2. Magnitude of the Margins of Dumping 

Likely To Prevail 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–20569 Filed 9–10–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–016] 

Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light 

Truck Tires From the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results 

and Partial Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2022– 

2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

finds that certain exporters of passenger 

vehicle and light truck tires (passenger 

tires) from the People’s Republic of 

China (China) made sales of subject 

merchandise at prices below normal 

value (NV) during the period of review 

(POR) August 1, 2022, through July 31, 

2023. Commerce also preliminarily 

finds that five companies had no entries 

of subject merchandise during the POR, 

and that it is appropriate to rescind this 

review with respect to 14 companies 

because all requests for review of these 

companies were withdrawn. We invite 

interested parties to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable September 11, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit 

Astvatsatrian, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6412. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 18, 2023, based on timely 

requests for review, in accordance with 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2024 / Notices 73629 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

71829 (October 18, 2023); see also Certain 

Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the 

People’s Republic of China: Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination and 

Antidumping Duty Order; and Amended Final 

Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and 

Countervailing Duty Order, 80 FR 47902 (August 

10, 2015) (Order). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of the 2022–2023 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated April 4, 2024. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Certain Passenger Vehicle 

and Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic 

of China; 2022–2023,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum). 

5See Dynamic Tire’s Letter, ‘‘Sailun Withdrawal 

Request of Administrative Review,’’ dated October 

24, 2023; Sumitomo Rubber’s Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal 

of Request for Review,’’ dated November 14, 2023; 

Hankook Tire’s Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review for Jiangsu Hankook,’’ dated 

December 13, 2023; Shandong New Continent’s 

Letter, ‘‘SNC Withdrawal of Request for 

Antidumping Administrative Review,’’ dated 

December 27, 2023; Giti’s Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of 

Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated January 

2, 2024; Qingdao Fullrun’s and Qingdao Lakesea’s 

Letters, ‘‘Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated January 5, 2024; Qingdao Keter’s, 

Sanli Tire’s, and Qingdao Sunfulcess’ Letter, 

‘‘Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated January 11, 2024; Triangle Tyre’s 

Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated January 11, 2024; and Hankook 

Tire’s Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated January 15, 2024. 

6See, e.g., Dioctyl Terephthalate from the 

Republic of Korea: Rescission of Antidumping 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022, 88 FR 24758 

(April 24, 2023); see also Certain Carbon and Alloy 

Steel Cut- to Length Plate from the Federal Republic 

of Germany: Recission of Antidumping 

Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 88 FR 4157 

(January 24, 2023). 

7See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2). 

8See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

9See Memorandum, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Rescind 

Review, In Part,’’ dated January 29, 2024; and 

Memorandum, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Rescind Review 

on Shandong Transtone,’’ dated August 22, 2024. 

10See Shandong Linglong’s Letter, ‘‘Shandong 

Linglong Comments on the Department’s Notice of 

Intent to Rescind,’’ dated February 5, 2024. 

11See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 

‘‘Separate Rates.’’ 

19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated this 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on passenger 

tires from China.1 This review covers 33 

exporters of the subject merchandise. 

In April 2024, we extended the 

preliminary results of this review until 

August 29, 2024.2 On July 22, 2024, 

Commerce tolled certain deadlines in 

this administrative proceeding by seven 

days.3 The deadline for these 

preliminary results is now September 5, 

2024. 

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this administrative review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.4

The Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list 

of topics discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is included in 

Appendix I. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the Order 

are passenger tires from China. For a full 

description of the scope of the Order, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if a party who requested the review 

withdraws the request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of notice of 

initiation of the requested review in the 

Federal Register. Between October 2023 

and January 2024, all parties withdrew 

their requests for review by the 90-day 

withdrawal deadline for the companies 

identified in Appendix III.5 Because all 

parties timely withdrew their requests 

for a review of these exporters, 

consistent with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce is rescinding this review, in 

part, with respect to these companies. 

Furthermore, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(3), Commerce will rescind 

an administrative review when there are 

no entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR for which liquidation is 

suspended.6 Normally, upon 

completion of an administrative review, 

the suspended entries are liquidated at 

the antidumping duty assessment rate 

calculated for the review period.7

Therefore, for an administrative review 

of a company to be conducted, there 

must be a suspended entry that 

Commerce can instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate 

at the antidumping duty assessment rate 

calculated for the POR.8

In January and August 2024, we 

notified parties of our intent to rescind 

this administrative review, in part, with 

respect to the companies identified in 

Appendix III, with the exception of 

Shandong Linglong Tyre Co., Ltd. 

(Shandong Linglong), because there 

were no suspended entries of subject 

merchandise produced or exported by 

these companies during the POR, and 

we invited interested parties to 

comment.9 Therefore, we determine 

that, in the absence of any suspended 

entries of subject merchandise from 

these five companies listed in Appendix 

III during the POR, we are rescinding 

the administrative review for these 

companies (excluding Shandong 

Linglong), in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(3). 

With regard to Shandong Linglong, 

we received comments from this 

company, stating that it had reviewable 

entries during the POR.10 We intend to 

request further information regarding 

such entries, which we will consider for 

the final results. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213. We 

calculated constructed export prices in 

accordance with section 772(b) of the 

Act. Because China is a non-market 

economy (NME) country, within the 

meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, 

we calculated NV in accordance with 

section 773(c) of the Act. For a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying our conclusions, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Separate Rates 

As discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum, Commerce 

preliminarily finds that Shandong 

Hongsheng Rubber Technology Co., Ltd. 

(Shandong Hongsheng) and Shandong 

Haohua Tire Co., Ltd. (Shandong 

Haohua) have not established their 

eligibility for a separate rate. Moreover, 

Commerce preliminarily finds that 

seven other companies under review 

did not establish their eligibility for 

separate rates because they failed to 

provide either a separate rate 

application, a separate rate certification, 

or a no-shipment certification (if they 

had previously received a separate rate). 

As such, we preliminarily determine 

that Shandong Hongsheng, Shandong 

Haohua, and these seven other 

companies are part of the China-wide 

entity. See Appendix II for a complete 

list of these companies. 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that the following companies have 

demonstrated their eligibility for a 

separate rate in this review: 11 (1) 

Zhaoqing Junhong Co., Ltd (Junhong); 

(2) Jiangsu General Science Technology 

Co., Ltd.; (3) Qingdao Transamerica Tire 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
73630 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2024 / Notices 

12See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

13See Order, 80 FR at 47904, n.19. 

14Because we are requesting additional 

information regarding Shandong Linglong, we 

intend to set a separate briefing schedule related to 

any issues specific to this company at a later date. 

15See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative 

Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 

88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (APO and 

Service Final Rule). 

16See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

17We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an 

argument that Commerce would normally address 

in a comment of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

18See APO and Service Final Rule. 

19See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

20 Id. 

21See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full discussion 

of this practice. 

22See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments: 2014– 

Industrial Co., Ltd.; and (4) Winrun Tyre 

Co., Ltd. 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not address the establishment of a 

rate to apply to companies not selected 

for individual examination when 

Commerce limits its examination in an 

administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation, for guidance when 

determining the dumping margin for 

respondents that are not individually 

examined in an administrative review. 

Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states 

that the all-others rate should be 

calculated by averaging the weightedaverage dumping margins for 

individually-examined respondents, 

excluding dumping margins that are 

zero, de minimis, or based entirely on 

facts available. For these preliminary 

results, we preliminarily determined a 

dumping margin for the separate rate 

respondents using the calculated rate of 

the mandatory respondent, Junhong, 

which is not zero or de minimis, or 

determined entirely on the basis of facts 

available. 

China-Wide Entity 

Commerce’s policy regarding 

conditional review of the China-wide 

entity applies to this administrative 

review.12 Because no party requested a 

review of the China-wide entity, the 

China-wide entity is not under review. 

Therefore, the rate previously 

established for the China-wide entity 

(i.e., 76.46 percent) remains the Chinawide entity rate this review.13

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily determine that the 

following estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins exist for the period 

August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2023: 

Exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Jiangsu General Science 

Technology Co., Ltd .......... 28.76 

Qingdao Transamerica Tire 

Industrial Co., Ltd .............. 28.76 

Winrun Tyre Co., Ltd ............ 28.76 

Zhaoqing Junhong Co., Ltd .. 28.76 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations and analysis performed to 

interested parties for these preliminary 

results within five days of any public 

announcement or, if there is no public 

announcement, within five days after 

the date of publication of this notice in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), 

interested parties may submit case briefs 

to Commerce no later than 30 days after 

the date of publication of this notice in 

the Federal Register regarding all 

issues, except those related to POR 

entries for Shandong Linglong.14

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed not later 

than five days after the date for filing 

case briefs.15 Interested parties who 

submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in 

this proceeding must submit: (1) a table 

of contents listing each issue; and (2) a 

table of authorities.16

As provided under 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 

proceedings we have encouraged 

interested parties to provide an 

executive summary of their brief that 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes. In this review, we 

instead request that interested parties 

provide at the beginning of their briefs 

a public, executive summary for each 

issue raised in their briefs.17 Further, we 

request that interested parties limit their 

executive summary of each issue to no 

more than 450 words, not including 

citations. We intend to use the executive 

summaries as the basis of the comment 

summaries included in the issues and 

decision memorandum that will 

accompany the final results in this 

administrative review. We request that 

interested parties include footnotes for 

relevant citations in the executive 

summary of each issue. Note that 

Commerce has amended certain of its 

requirements pertaining to the service of 

documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).18

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) 

the party’s name, address, and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of issues to be 

discussed. Issues raised in the hearing 

will be limited to those raised in the 

respective case and rebuttal briefs. Oral 

presentations at the hearing will be 

limited to issues raised in the briefs. An 

electronically filed hearing request must 

be received successfully in its entirety 

by Commerce’s electronic records 

system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern 

Time within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of this 

administrative review, Commerce shall 

determine, and CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review.19

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

because Junhong reported the entered 

value for its U.S. sales, we calculated 

importer-specific ad valorem duty 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of dumping calculated 

for the importer’s examined sales to the 

total entered value of those sales. Where 

either a respondent’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is zero or de minimis 

within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific 

rate is zero or de minimis, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties.20

Pursuant to Commerce’s assessment 

practice,21 for entries that were not 

reported in the U.S. data submitted by 

Junhong, we will instruct to CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the China-wide 

rate. Additionally, where Commerce 

determines that an exporter under 

review had no shipments of subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR, any suspended entries of 

subject merchandise that entered under 

that exporter’s CBP case number during 

the POR will be liquidated at the 

dumping margin assigned to the Chinawide entity. 

For respondents not individually 

examined in this administrative review 

that qualified for a separate rate, the 

assessment rate will be equal to the 

dumping margin assigned to Junhong in 

the final results of this review.22 Finally, 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 11, 2024 / Notices 73631 

2015, 81 FR 29528 (May 12, 2016), and 

accompanying PDM at 10–11, unchanged in Drawn 

Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; Final Determination of No 

Shipments; 2014–2015, 81 FR 54042 (August 15, 

2016). 

23See Order, 80 FR at 47904, n.19. 

24See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

we intend to liquidate entries 

containing subject merchandise 

exported by the companies under 

review that we determine in the final 

results to be part of the China-wide 

entity at the China-wide rate of 76.46 

percent. 

In accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final results 

of this review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of this review and for future 

deposits of estimated antidumping 

duties, where applicable. Commerce 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the 

date of publication of the final results of 

this review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Finally, for the companies for which 

we are rescinding this review, we intend 

to instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries at a rate 

equal to the cash deposit rate of 

estimated antidumping duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to 

issue assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided for by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for 

the companies listed above that have a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be that rate established in the final 

results of this review (except, if the rate 

is zero or de minimis, then a cash 

deposit rate of zero will be established 

for that company); (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed exporters not 

listed in the final results of review that 

have separate rates, the cash deposit rate 

will continue to be the exporter’s 

weighted-average dumping margin 

published of the most recentlycompleted segment of this proceeding; 

(3) for all Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be the rate for Chinawide entity (i.e., 76.46 percent); 23 and 

(4) for all exporters of subject 

merchandise which are not located in 

China and are not eligible for a separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate applicable to Chinese exporter(s) 

that supplied that non-Chinese exporter. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Final Results 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of all 

issues raised in any written briefs, not 

later than 120 days after the publication 

of these preliminary results in the 

Federal Register, unless otherwise 

extended.24

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this POR. Failure 

to comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties and/or an increase 

in the amount of antidumping duties by 

the amount of the countervailing duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213 and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: September 5, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

V. Currency Conversion 

VI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Companies Preliminary Found To Be Part of 

the China-Wide Entity 

1. Kinforest Tyre Co., Ltd. 

2. Qingdao Fullrun Tyre Tech Corp., Ltd. 

3. Qingdao Powerich Tyre Co., Ltd. 

4. Qingdao Vitour United Corp. 

5. Shandong Haohua Tire Co., Ltd. 

6. Shandong Hongsheng Rubber Technology 

Co., Ltd. 

7. Shandong Wanda Boto Tyre Co., Ltd. 

8. Tianjin Wanda Tyre Group Co., Ltd. 

9. Zhongce Rubber Group Company, Ltd. 

Appendix III 

Companies Rescinded From Review 

Rescission Based on Withdrawal of Review 

Requests 

1. Anhui Jichi Tire Co., Ltd.; 

2. Giti Radial Tire (Anhui) Company, Ltd.; 

Giti Tire (Anhui) Company, Ltd.; Giti 

Tire (Chongqing) Company, Ltd.; Giti 

Tire (Fujian) Company, Ltd.; Giti Tire 

Global Trading Pte. Ltd.; Giti Tire 

Greatwall Company, Ltd.; Giti Tire 

(Hualin) Company, Ltd.; Giti Tire 

(Yinchuan) Company, Ltd. 

3. Hankook Tire China Co., Ltd. 

4. Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co., Ltd. 

5. Qingdao Fullrun Tyre Corp., Ltd. 

6. Qingdao Keter International Co., Limited 

7. Qingdao Lakesea Tyre Co., Ltd. 

8. Qingdao Sunfulcess Tyre Co., Ltd. 

9. Dynamic Tire Corp.; Shandong Jinyu 

Industrial Co.; Sailun Tire International 

Corp.; Husky Tire Corp.; Seatex PTE. 

Ltd.; Seatex International Inc.; Sailun 

Group (HongKong) Co., Limited; Sailun 

HK; Sailun Jinyu HK; Sailun Group Co., 

Ltd.; Sailun Group; Sailun Jinyu Group 

Co., Ltd.; and Sailun Jinyu 

10. Sailun Tire Americas Inc. 

11. Shandong New Continent Tire Co., Ltd. 

12. Shandong Province Sanli Tire 

Manufacture Co., Ltd. 

13. Sumitomo Rubber (Changshu) Co., Ltd.; 

Sumitomo Rubber (Hunan) Co., Ltd.; and 

Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd. 

14. Triangle Tyre Co., Ltd. 

Rescission Based on No Suspended Entries 

1. Prinx Chengshan (Shandong) Tire Co., Ltd. 

2. Qingdao Nexen Tire Corporation. 

3. Shandong Changfeng Tyres Co., Ltd. 

4. Shandong Qilun Rubber Co., Ltd. 

5. Shandong Transtone Tyre Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2024–20582 Filed 9–10–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1