alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.19 to Biodrain Medical, Inc. Form S-1



Exhibit 10.19 



CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
699
 Minnetonka Highlands Lane 


	
 

	
Orono, MN
 55356-9728








	
 

	
 


	
                    $10,000.00

	
September 29, 2006     





          FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, “BioDrain Medical,
Inc.,” a Minnesota company (“Maker”), hereby promises to pay to the order of
Andcor Companies Inc.. (“Payee”), at the address of Payee specified below, the
principal sum of Ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), in lawful money of the
United States of America, together with interest thereon, at the rate set forth
below.


          1.
The principal of and interest upon this Note shall be due and payable as follows:


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
(a)

	
This Note
 shall bear interest at a per annum rate of interest of 10.25% based upon a
 year of 365 days and actual days elapsed.


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
(b)

	
The entire
 unpaid principal balance of this Note and accrued interest hereunder shall be
 due and payable in full no later than “March 31, 2007” (the “Maturity Date”)





          2.
Convertibility and warrant terms:


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
(a)

	
The
 debenture is convertible to BioDrain common stock at $.90 per share or the
 price per share at which the next equity financing is completed, whichever is
 lower.


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
(b)

	
Maker hereby
 grants to Payee warrants to purchase 10,000 shares of BioDrain common stock
 at $1.00 per share or the price per share at which the next equity financing
 is completed, whichever is lower. The exercise of such warrants is on a call basis
 for a period of five (5) years from the date of the debenture. Exercise must
 be in writing.





          The
undersigned may at any time prepay all or any portion of the principal or
interest owing hereunder.


          Maker
hereby waives presentment, demand, notice of dishonor, protest, notice of
protest and all other demands, protests and notices in connection with the
execution, delivery, performance, collection and enforcement of this Note.
Payee shall have full recourse against the undersigned, and shall not be
required to proceed against the assets






of the Maker
in the event of default. Maker shall pay all costs of collection when incurred,
including reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses.


          This
Note is being delivered in, is intended to be performed in, shall be construed
and interpreted in accordance with, and be governed by the internal laws of,
the State of Minnesota, without regard to principles of conflict of laws.


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
BIODRAIN
 MEDICAL, INC.

	
 

	
ANDCOR
 COMPANIES, INC.


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
By:

	


	
 

	
By:

	



	
 

	 

	
 

	
 

	 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Title:

	
CFO

	
 

	
Title:

	
CFO


	
 

	 

	
 

	
 

	 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
539 E. Lake
 Street 

 Wayzata, MN 55391
asbform10q080930_ex10-2.htm


    
      
         


      

      
        
        

        
          
            

          

        

      

      
         


        Exhibit
10.2

        FIRST
AMENDMENT TO THE CARDIOTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

        EMPLOYEE
STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

      

    


    WHEREAS, AdvanSource
Biomaterials Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the CardioTech International,
Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, effective as of October 16, 2007 (the
“Plan”);

     

    WHEREAS, in Section 19 of the
Plan, the Company, through its Board of Directors, has reserved the right to
amend the Plan at any time and for any reason; and

     

    WHEREAS, the Company desires
to amend the Plan to adjust the initial offering period and to amend the
provisions for adjustment in the event of certain equity restructuring events
and corporate transactions.

     

    NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is
hereby amended effective as of October 16, 2007, as follows:

     

    
      	
              1.  

            	
              By
      revising the second sentence of Section 4 to read as
    follows:

            


    

     

    “The
first Offering Period shall commence on March 1, 2008 and shall continue until
August 31, 2008.”

     

    
      	
              2.  

            	
              By
      revising the first sentence of Section 18(a) to read as
      follows:

            


    

     

    Subject
to any required action by the stockholders of the Company, the number of Shares
covered by each option under the Plan that has not yet been exercised, the
number of Shares that have been authorized for issuance under the Plan but have
not yet been placed under option, the price per Share of Common Stock covered by
each option under the Plan that has not yet been exercised, and any other Share
limits set forth in the Plan shall be proportionately adjusted for any stock
split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination, reclassification of the
Common Stock (including any such change in the number of Shares of Common Stock
effected in connection with a change in domicile of the Company), divestiture
(including a spin-off), rights offering, any dividend or distribution to holders
of Shares of Common Stock other than an ordinary cash dividend, or any other
similar change in capitalization effected without receipt of consideration by
the Company; provided, however, that conversion of any convertible securities of
the Company shall not be deemed to have been “effected without receipt of
consideration.”

     

    
      	
              3.  

            	
              By
      deleting the second paragraph of Section 18(b) in its
      entirety.

            


    

     

    
      	
              4.  

            	
              Except
      as provided above, the Plan shall remain in full force and
      effect.

            


    

     

     

    
      	 	ADVANSOURCE
      BIOMATERIALS CORPORATION
	 	 
	 	 
	
               
      

            	By:  /s/ Michael F.
      Adams


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              On
      Behalf of Its Board of
Directors
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2320 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the national limitation amount for qualified highway or surface freight transfer facility 

bonds. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 18, 2018 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the national limitation amount for qualified highway or 

surface freight transfer facility bonds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Building United States 

5 Infrastructure and Leveraging Development Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘BUILD Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2320 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE NATIONAL LIMITATION AMOUNT FOR 

2 QUALIFIED HIGHWAY OR SURFACE FREIGHT 

3 TRANSFER FACILITY BONDS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 142(m)(2)(A) of the In5 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘$15,000,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$20,800,000,000’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall apply to bonds issued after the date of 

9 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1186 

To prohibit the use of funds to transfer individuals detained at Naval Station, 

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to facilities in Virginia or to house such individuals at such facilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2009 

Mr. FORBES (for himself, Mr. CANTOR, and Mr. WOLF) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of funds to transfer individuals detained 

at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to facilities 

in Virginia or to house such individuals at such facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO TRANSFER 

4 INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT NAVAL STATION, 

5 GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, TO FACILITIES IN 

6 VIRGINIA. 

7 None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made 

8 available to any Federal department or agency may be 

9 used to transfer any individual detained by the United 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1186 IH

1 States at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to any 

2 military installation located in the Commonwealth of Vir3 ginia or any Federal detention center located in the Com4 monwealth of Virginia or to house any such individual at 

5 such an installation or detention center. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RY. CO. OF TEXAS v. STEELE.

No. 4195.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

May 12, 1932.

*343Barney, Calhoun & Marsh, of Longview, and N. L. Dalby, of Texarkana, for plaintiff in error.

Wm. Y. Brown, of Texarkana, and Danaher & Danaher, of Pine Bluff, Ark., for defendant in error.

WILLSON, C. J.

(after stating the case as above).

Plaintiff in error insists that the effect of the findings- of the jury in answer to the questions numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, set out in the statement above, was to determine it was guilty of actionable negligence, whereas the effect of the finding in answer to the question numbered 15, set out in said statement, was to determine “there (quoting) was no negligence on the part of appellant, (plaintiff in error) its agents and servants, but that •appellee (defendant in error) was injured by one of the risks and dangers ordinarily incident to the employment.” On the theory that the findings specified therefore were in conflict and destroyed each other, plaintiff in error insists, further, that saíne could not he treated as a sufficient basis for the judgment rendered against it.

We think an issue as to assumed risk was not raised by the. evidence, that such an issue therefore should not have been submitted to the jury, and that the trial court in rendering judgment should, as evidently he did, have ignored, because immaterial, the finding of the jury in response to said question numbered 15 propounded to them. If it should be conceded it appeared plaintiff in error at the time of the accident was a common carrier by railroad engaged in interstate commerce, and that defendant in error was employed by it in such commerce, and therefore that the rights of the parties were determinable with reference to the federal statute (sections 51 and 54, title 45, U. S. Code, Annotated; and see 29 C. J. 689) entitling such a carrier, in a proper case, to invoke the doctrine of assumed risk, we think the conclusion that the testimony did not make such an issue is nevertheless correct. As we construe the evidence, there is no suggestion in any of it that the injury to defendant in error was due to anything else than negligence for which plaintiff in error was responsible. It is tbe law that negligence of an employer is not one of the risks incident to an employee’s undertaking, and that the latter, when ignorant of the existence of such negligence, as defendant in error was in the instant case, does not assume the risk of injury incurred in-doing the work, 39 C. J. 684, 896, and authorities there cited,

judgment is affirmed,
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                   CAREY INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES INCORPORATED

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Carey Institutional Properties
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, John J. Park, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ John J. Park
    -------------------------
    John J. Park
    Chief Financial Officer
             3/19/04
    -------------------------
    Date

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Carey Institutional Properties
Incorporated and will be retained by Carey Institutional Properties Incorporated
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Opinion issued November 14 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 13
- 00 231
- CV

——————————— JULIO GONZALEZ , Appellant

V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC , Appellee
On Appeal from the 190 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2012
- 07076

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a judgment signed December 21, 2012. On April 19, 2013, the Court ordered that this case be referred to mediation. In the referral, the Court ordered that: “No later than two days from the conclusion of the mediation, the parties and the mediator shall advise the Clerk of this Court in writing whether2

the parties did or did not settle the underlying dispute

. . . .” The deadline for conducting mediation was June 5, 2013.
O n June 12, 2013, the mediator filed a document with the Court informing the Court that the parties had settled all issues in the case. Nevertheless, neither party filed a document with the Court to advise the Court that the case did or did not settle nor has either party filed a motion to dismiss the a ppeal based on the settlement. On July 12, 2013, the Court notified the parties that the mediator had filed a report and requested that the parties file a motion to dismiss within seven days of the date of t he notice. Neither party responded to the notice. After being notified on October 9, 2013 that this appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to comply with a court order or a notice from the clerk requiring a response , appellant did not respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(c). Accordingly, w e dismiss the appeal. We dismiss any pending motions as
moot

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes , Higley , and Massengale.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 1999 and the Consolidated
Statement of Income for the Year Ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          1,543
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  90,231
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (2,196)
<INVENTORY>                                    23,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              117,607
<PP&E>                                        930,178
<DEPRECIATION>                              (114,182)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,159,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         319,736
<BONDS>                                       162,853
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          513
<OTHER-SE>                                    509,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,159,503
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              362,744
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 272,666
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (1,246)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  654
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             17,830
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                73,494
<INCOME-TAX>                                   29,103
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            44,391
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   66,857
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.30


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.36

First Union National Bank                                Patrick A. McGovern
123 South Broad Street                                   Senior Vice President
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19109-1199                    Large Corporate Credit
215 985-3031
Fax 215 985-7576


October 21, 1996


Mr. Gary Klocek
Controller
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
250 Rittenhouse Circle
Bristol, PA 19007

Dear Gary:

I am delighted to advise Jones Apparel Group, Inc. (the "Company") that First 
Union National Bank (the "Bank") has approved a Discretionary Line of Credit to
a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any one time of U.S.$75,000,000 (the 
"Line").  Under the Line at their discretion, the Bank's designated officers are
authorized to approve short-term credit undertakings such as loans or letters of
credit on terms in effect from time-to-time.  The Line is intended to facilitate
our consideration of your requests for extensions of credit, and, although it 
may be terminated by the Company or the Bank at any time, lines are formally 
reviewed and reset by the Bank on an annual basis.

Availability under the Line is subject to the execution and delivery of such 
documents as the Bank from time-to-time considers necessary or desirable and 
the receipt of, and the Bank's continued satisfaction with, current financial
and other information, which the Company will promptly furnish the Bank as
it may from time-to-time request.

We look forward to our continuing relationship and the opportunity to assist in
fulfilling your financial needs.

Sincerely,

FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK

/s/ Patrick A. McGovern

Patrick A. McGovern
Senior Vice President

PAMcG/bjc
Exhibit 10.04


 





 


September 15,
2008


 


ARTISTdirect, Inc.


1601 Cloverfield Blvd., Suite 400


Santa Monica, CA 90404


 


Attention:                                         Mr. Dimitri
Villard


Interim Chief Executive Officer


 


This
amendment (the “Amendment”) to the letter (the “Engagement Letter”) dated February 7,
2008 hereby terminates the Engagement of Salem Partners LLC (“Salem Partners”)
by ARTISTdirect, Inc. (the “Company”) pursuant to the Engagement Letter and
releases Salem Partners and the Company from all future obligations thereunder,
except those detailed in the Engagement Letter as surviving any termination of
the Engagement.  Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the parties acknowledge that the Company will immediately pay Salem
Partners a non-refundable cash fee of $125,000 and that the Company shall not
have any obligation to make any other payments to Salem Partners.


 


Please
confirm that the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding and
agreement by signing where indicated below and returning to us the duplicate of
the Amendment enclosed herewith, whereupon the Amendment will constitute our
binding agreement with respect to the matters set forth herein.


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Very
  truly yours,

  	 

	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	 

	
   

  	
   

  	
  SALEM
  PARTNERS LLC

  	 

	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	 

	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	 

	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
    /s/
  Stephen Prough

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
    Name: Stephen Prough

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
    Title: Managing Director

  
					



 


	
  CONFIRMED AND AGREED:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ARTISTDIRECT,
  INC.

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
      /s/
  Dimitir Villard

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:
  Dimitri Villard

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title:
  Chief Executive Officer
April 29, 2015

Mr. Michael Huerta, Administrator Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue Southwest Washington, D.C. 20591

Dear Mr. Huerta:
I write to you today in support of the petition submitted by Eagle

- Eye Drone Service. It is my understanding that the petition requests approval of the use of unmanned aerial systems for use in the real estate industry.
More specifically, this Michigan

- based company plans to utilize small, unmanned aerial systems to perform aerial photography for marketing opportunities, and inspection purposes. The clever use of these systems will undoubtedly increase sales of homes and businesses, and reduce the risks associated with standard inspection methods.
I am told by the project’s sponsor that this unique service will utilize and comply with all FAA standards and collect vital flight information to help improve FAA rulemaking process.
I appreciate your attention in this matter, and trust that you will give the merits of Eagle

- Eye Drone Service’s pro posal adequate consideration. Should you need to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Dan Benishek M.D. Member of Congress Michigan’s 1 st District