### 20020 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 3, 2012 / Notices

permit, if issued, is to grant the permit holder priority to file a license application during the permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorizethe permit holder to perform any landdisturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands or waters owned by others without the owners’ express permission.

The proposed project would consist of the following: (1) An approximately1,325-foot-long, 128-foot-high concretefaced rockfill dam; (2) a 25-footdiameter intake structure; (3) a 775-footlong, 25-foot-diameter tunnel bringing flows from the intake to a gate house; (4) a gate house and gate shaft to convey flows from the tunnel to the main penstock; (5) a 120-foot-long, 9- to 13-foot-diameter main penstock, whichbifercates into a 135-foot-long, 9-footdiameter penstock leading to turbine 1 and a 115-foot-long, 9-foot-diameter penstock leading to turbine 2; (6) a 150- foot-long, 75-foot-wide powerhouse containing two vertical Francis turbine/ generator units rated for 6.7 megawatts (MW) each, for a total installed capacityof 13.4 MW; (7) a 100-foot-long, 75-footwide tailrace returning project flows to the Allen River; (8) a 118-mile long, 138-kilovolt transmission line leading from the powerhouse to a substation in the town of Bethel; (9) project access facilities, including a float plane dock and a heliport; (10) project roads leading from the float plane dock to the dam and powerhouse; and (11) appurtenant facilities. The estimated annual generation of the Chikuminuk Project would be 88.7 gigawatt-hours.

Applicant Contact: Ms. Elaine Brown, Executive Director, Nuvista Light and Electric Cooperative, Inc., 301 Calista Court, Suite A, Anchorage, Alaska 99518; phone: (907) 868–2460.

FERC Contact: Jennifer Harper; phone: (202) 502–6136.

Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission’s Web
site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system at http:// www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ ecomment.asp. You must include your
name and contact information at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll free at 1–866–208–3676, or for TTY, (202) 502–8659. Although the Commission strongly encourages electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.

More information about this project, including a copy of the application, can be viewed or printed on the ‘‘eLibrary’’
link of Commission’s Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P–14369) in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

Dated: March 27, 2012. Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012–7909 Filed 4–2–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6717–01–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9655–2]**

**Clean Water Act Section 303(d): Availability of List Decisions** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency.

**ACTION :**  Notice of availability.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces the availability of EPA’s Responsiveness Summary Concerning EPA’s November 30, 2011, Public Notice of Proposed
Decisions to Add Waters and Pollutants to Louisiana’s 2010 Section 303(d) List.

On November 30, 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a notice in the Federal Register at Volume 76, Number 230, pages 74057–74058 providing the public the opportunity to review its decision to partially approve and proposal to partially disapprove Louisiana’s 2010 Section 303(d) List. Specifically, EPA approved Louisiana’s listing of 410 waterbody pollutant combinations, and associated priority rankings. EPA proposed to disapprove Louisiana’s
decisions not to list three waterbodies. These three waterbodies were added by EPA because the applicable numeric water quality standards marine criterion for dissolved oxygen was not attained in these segments.

Based on the Responsiveness Summary, EPA finds no new information or persuasive arguments as to why the three waters should not be
added to the 2010 Louisiana Section 303(d) List as proposed. Therefore, EPA is taking Final Action on the addition of three waterbody pollutant combinations
to the final Louisiana 2010 Section 303(d) List. The basis for these decisions is described in EPA’s Responsiveness Summary and the Record of Decision.

**ADDRESSES :**  Copies of EPA’s Responsiveness Summary Concerning EPA’s March 20, 2012 Public Notice of
Final Decisions to Add Waters and
Pollutants to Louisiana’s 2010 Section 303(d) List can be obtained at EPA Region 6’s Web site at http:// www.epa.gov/region6/water/npdes/ tmdl/index.htm#303dlists, or by writing or calling Ms. Diane Smith at Water Quality Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 6, 1445 Ross Ave., Dallas, TX 75202–2733, telephone (214) 665–2145, facsimile (214) 665–6490, or email: smith.diane@epa.gov. Underlying
documents from the administrative
record for these decisions are available for public inspection at the above
address. Please contact Ms. Smith to schedule an inspection.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Diane Smith at (214) 665–2145.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires that each state identify thosewaters for which existing technologybased pollution controls are not stringent enough to attain or maintain state water quality standards. For those waters, states are required to establish Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) according to a priority ranking.

EPA’s Water Quality Planning and Management regulations include requirements related to the implementation of Section 303(d) of the CWA (40 CFR 130.7). The regulations require states to identify water quality limited waters still requiring TMDLs every two years. The list of waters still needing TMDLs must also include priority rankings and must identify the waters targeted for TMDL development during the next two years (40 CFR 130.7).

Consistent with EPA’s regulations,
Louisiana submitted to EPA its 2010 listing decisions under Section 303(d) on January 13, 2011. On November 30, 2011, EPA approved Louisiana’s 2010 listing of 410 water body-pollutant combinations and associated priority rankings, and proposed to disapprove
Louisiana’s decisions not to list three waterbodies. On March 20, 2012, EPA finalized the action to disapprove Louisiana’s 2010 listing decisions not to list three water quality limited segments. EPA identified these additional waters and pollutants along


### 20021 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 3, 2012 / Notices

with priority rankings for inclusion on the 2010 Section 303(d) List.

Dated: March 20, 2012.
William K. Honker, Acting Director, Water Quality Protection Division, Region 6.

[FR Doc. 2012–7952 Filed 4–2–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS**
**COMMISSION**

**Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications**  **Commission Under Delegated Authority** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Communications
Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice and request for

comments.

**SUMMARY :**  As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520), the Federal Communications Commission invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection(s). Comments are requested concerning: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) ways to
further reduce the information burden
for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid OMB control
number.

**DATES :**  Written Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments should be submitted on or before June 4, 2012. If you anticipate that you will be submitting PRA comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the FCC contact listed below as soon as possible. **ADDRESSES :**  Submit your PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of Management and Budget, via fax at 202–
395–5167 or via Internet at Nicholas

_ A.

_Fraser@omb.eop.gov and to Judith B. Herman, Federal Communications Commission, via the

Internet at Judith-b.herman@fcc.gov. To submit your PRA comments by email
send them to: PRA@fcc.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Judith B. Herman, Office of Managing Director, (202) 418–0214.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0817. Title: Computer III Further Remand Proceedings: BOC Provision of Enhanced Services (ONA Requirements), CC Docket No. 95–20.

Form Number: N/A. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities.

Number of Respondents: 3 respondents; 6 responses.

Estimated Time per Response: 2–50 hours.

Frequency of Response: On occasion and semi-annual reporting requirements.

Obligation to Respond: Mandatory. Statutory authority for this information collection is in 47 U.S.C. sections 151,
152, 154, 161, 201–205, 208, 251, 260 and 271–276.

Total Annual Burden: 162 hours. Total Annual Cost: N/A. Privacy Impact Assessment: N/A. Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: The Commission is not requesting that the respondents submit confidential information to the FCC. However, applicants may request confidentiality and request confidential treatment of their information they believe is
confidential under 47 CFR 0.459 of the
Commission’s rules.

Needs and Uses: The Commission is seeking OMB approval for an extension of this expiring information collection in order to obtain the full three year approval from them. There are no changes in the reporting requirements. The Commission has adjusted the total
burden hours from 216 to 162 hours because there are only three Bell Operating Companies (BOCs) instead of four—which was reported in 2009.

Bell Operating Companies (BOCs) are required to post their Comparably Efficient Interconnection (CEI) plans and amendments on their publicly
accessible Internet sites. The requirement extends to all CEO plans for intraLATA information services, telemessaging, or alarm monitoring services, and for new or amended payphone services. If the BOC receives a good faith request for a plan from
someone who does not have Internet access, the BOC must notify that person where a paper copy of the plan is available for public inspection.

The CEI plans will be used to ensure that BOCs comply with Commission policies and regulations safeguarding against potential anticompetitive behavior by the BOCs in the provision
of information services.

Federal Communications Commission.

Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director.

[FR Doc. 2012–7857 Filed 4–2–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6712–01–P**

**FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM**

**Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or**  **Bank Holding Company**

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at
the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank
indicated for that notice or to the offices
of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 27,

2012.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690–1414:

1. The Gus J. Lukas and Lorraine J. Lukas 2006 Trust for Lori J. Foy (‘‘Trust’’), and Lori J. Foy, Grafton, Wisconsin, individually and as trustee of Trust, and Lori J. Foy, together as a group acting in concert with Trust, Lori J. Foy as trustee, Paul Foy, Grafton, Wisconsin, John Lukas, and Mark Lukas, both of Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the Foy minor children, to retain control of Community Bancshares of Wisconsin, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain control of Cornerstone Community Bank, both in Grafton, Wisconsin.