55234 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 10, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

that may not necessitate a SEMS and 

why? Besides costs, what is the 

downside of using a SEMS? 

14. Are there any data, literature, or 

studies that show that implementation 

of a SEMS leads to a reduction in oil 

spills, property damage, injury or 

deaths, or other casualties? 

15. The Occupational Safety and 

Health Administration (OSHA) held a 

public meeting on September 20–21, 

2012, on the use of performance-based 

regulatory models in the U.S. oil and gas 

industry, offshore and onshore (see 77 

FR 50172). If you submitted comments 

during that public meeting or to the 

docket [OSHA–2012–0033] and want 

them considered in this rulemaking, 

please resubmit those comments to this 

docket [USCG–2012–0779]. 

16. Please provide any additional 

information or comments on the 

proposals in this ANPRM. 

Dated: August 16, 2013. 

Robert J. Papp, Jr., 

Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commandant. 

[FR Doc. 2013–21938 Filed 9–9–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2010–0335; FRL–9900–81– 

Region6] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Texas; 

Procedures for Stringency 

Determinations and Minor Permit 

Revisions for Federal Operating 

Permits 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

portions of three revisions to the Texas 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

concerning the Texas Federal Operating 

Permits Program. EPA has determined 

that these SIP revisions, submitted on 

December 17, 1999, October 4, 2001 and 

August 11, 2003, comply with the Clean 

Air Act and EPA regulations and are 

consistent with EPA policies. This 

action is being taken under section 110 

of the Act. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before October 10, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to 

Ms. Adina Wiley, Air Permits Section 

(6PD-R), Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, 

Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. Comments 

may also be submitted electronically or 

through hand delivery/courier by 

following the detailed instructions in 

the Addresses section of the direct final 

rule located in the rules section of this 

Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Adina Wiley, Air Permits Section (6PDR), Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 

1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733, 

telephone (214) 665–2115; fax number 

(214) 665–6762; email address 

wiley.adina@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

final rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the State’s 

SIP submittal as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no relevant adverse comments 

are received in response to this action, 

no further activity is contemplated. If 

EPA receives relevant adverse 

comments, the direct final rule will be 

withdrawn and all public comments 

received will be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this action 

should do so at this time. Please note 

that if EPA receives adverse comment 

on an amendment, paragraph, or section 

of this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

For additional information, see the 

direct final rule which is located in the 

rules section of this Federal Register. 

Dated: August 28, 2013. 

Ron Curry, 

Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2013–21866 Filed 9–9–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0453; FRL–9900–78– 

Region5] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Indiana; Volatile 

Organic Compound Emission Control 

Measures for Industrial Solvent 

Cleaning for Northwest Indiana 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: On May 29, 2012, the Indiana 

Department of Environmental 

Management (IDEM) submitted 

revisions to its volatile organic 

compound (VOC) industrial solvent 

cleaning rule for manufacturers of 

coatings, inks, adhesives, and resins for 

approval into its State Implementation 

Plan (SIP). These revisions are 

approvable because they are consistent 

with EPA’s Industrial Solvent Cleaning 

Control Technique Guideline (CTG) 

document and therefore satisfy the 

reasonably available control technology 

(RACT) requirements of the Clean Air 

Act (Act). 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before October 10, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2012–0453, by one of the 

following methods: 

• www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: aburano.douglas@epa.gov. 

• Fax: (312) 408–2279. 

• Mail: Douglas Aburano, Chief, 

Attainment Planning and Maintenance 

Section (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

• Hand Delivery: Douglas Aburano, 

Chief, Attainment Planning and 

Maintenance Section (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, 18th floor, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries 

are only accepted during the Regional 

Office’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2012– 

0453. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS