alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,824,584
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,063,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (278,819)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,296,912
<PP&E>                                     146,676,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             544,973,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,504,127
<BONDS>                                    462,454,565
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  57,653,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               544,973,036
<SALES>                                     31,978,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,978,181
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,483,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               560,557
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,195,988
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,262,163)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,262,163)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,262,163)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Clifford Lipscomb, a Suspended Attorney, Admitted Under the Name of Clifford Nathaniel Lipscomb, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Proceeding pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 to discipline the respondent, Clifford Lipscomb, a suspended attorney, who was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial Department on April 26, 1972, under the name Clifford Nathaniel Lipscomb.

*623Upon the papers filed in support of the application, it is

Adjudged that the application is denied as academic *(see, Matter of Lipscomb,*164 AD2d 358 [decided herewith]). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Brown, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.3



I, Patrycia T. Barnard, Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
of BayCorp Holdings, Ltd. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BayCorp
 Holdings, Ltd;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

  b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and
34-47986];

  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

  d) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors
and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
person performing the equivalent functions):

  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls.


Date: August 6, 2004  By: /s/ Patrycia T. Barnard
                          ------------------------
                          Patrycia T. Barnard
                          Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
                          (chief accounting officer)
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 10, 2024)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 73251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20604]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 10, 2024 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 73251]]


                Notice of September 6, 2024

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to Ethiopia

                On September 17, 2021, by Executive Order 14046, I 
                declared a national emergency pursuant to the 
                International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 
                1701 et seq.) to deal with the unusual and 
                extraordinary threat to the national security and 
                foreign policy of the United States constituted by the 
                situation in and in relation to northern Ethiopia.

                The situation in and in relation to northern Ethiopia, 
                which has been marked by activities that threaten the 
                peace, security, and stability of Ethiopia and the 
                greater Horn of Africa region, continues to pose an 
                unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 
                security and foreign policy of the United States. For 
                this reason, the national emergency declared in 
                Executive Order 14046 of September 17, 2021, must 
                continue in effect beyond September 17, 2024. 
                Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the 
                National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am 
                continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared 
                in Executive Order 14046 with respect to Ethiopia.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    September 6, 2024.

[FR Doc. 2024-20604
Filed 9-9-24; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3395-F4-P
CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  302  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF 2002

I,  Joseph  Flynn,  certify  that:

1.  I  have  reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Auxilio, Inc.
(the "Registrant");

2.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  Annual  report  does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by this Annual
Report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information  included  in  this  annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this Annual Report;

4.  Auxilios' other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and  maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules  13a-14)  for  the  registrant  and  have:
a)     designed  such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is  made  known  to  me by others within those entities, particularly during the
period  in  which  this  annual  report  is  being  prepared;
b)     evaluated  the  effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  as  of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Annual
Report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and
c)     presented in this Annual Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on  my  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation  Date;

5.  I  have  disclosed,  based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors  and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing  the  equivalent  functions):
a)     all  significant  deficiencies  in  the  design  or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have  identified for the
registrant's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and
b)     any  fraud,  whether  or  not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes
in  internal  controls  or  in  other  factors  that  could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
any  corrective  actions  with  regard  to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Dated:  September 17, 2004


 /s/  Joseph  Flynn
-------------------
Joseph  Flynn,
Chief  Executive  Officer
(Principal  Executive  Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.1****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION***     In connection with the Annual Report of Retail Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Heywood Wilansky, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.        Dated: April 5, 2007 By:  /s/ Heywood Wilansky    Heywood Wilansky, President,    Chief Executive Officer and Director    ***** This Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theExchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shallnot be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.   A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
 2.
 3.
 4.
 c)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 d)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
 c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Dated: May 4, 2010
    /s/ Matthew K. FustMatthew K. FustExecutive Vice President and 
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 47
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6698

QUINTON L. BRISBANE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BEAUFORT COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; C. L.

WILSON, Corporal; J. PURDY, Sergeant; S.

RODRIGUEZ,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (4:04-cv-00401-HMH)

Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: May 11, 2007

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Quinton L. Brisbane, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Hodges Waldron,

Jr.; Katy Anne Rice, CAROLINA LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, LLC, Bluffton,

South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Quinton L. Brisbane seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended

that relief be denied and advised Brisbane that failure to file

timely and specific objections to this recommendation could waive

appellate review of a district court order based upon the

recommendation. Despite this warning, Brisbane’s objections to the

magistrate judge’s recommendation were non-specific.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of

the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been

warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins,

766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474

U.S. 140 (1985). Brisbane has waived appellate review by failing

to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court as

modified to reflect that the dismissal of Brisbane’s pendent state

law claims should be dismissed without prejudice.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 1

### CFR Correction

This rule is being published by the Office of the Federal Register to correct an editorial or technical error that appeared in the most recent annual revision of the Code of Federal Regulations.

In Title 26 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1 (§§ 1.410 to 1.440), revised as of April 1, 2024, in section 1.430(h)(2)-1, remove paragraph (ii) immediately following paragraph (b)(2).

[FR Doc. 2024-20701 Filed 9-10-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 0099-10-P
1 | Building Technologies Office eere.energy.gov

Impact of Standards on Low Income 

Tenants

• Currently DOE treats low-income consumers like everyone else

• In the LCC all households pay the full cost of more efficient furnaces and gain 

the full benefit of lower energy bills

• Most low income households are tenants:

• Tenants usually pay energy bills but don’t choose equipment. 

• What is the impact of efficiency standards relative to NOPR LCC results?

• Assumptions: 

• Renters unaware of energy savings*

• Energy savings won’t raise rents

• Landlords aware of higher energy costs* 

• They pay higher cost of efficient equipment

• They attempt to raise rents, but may not cover equipment costs

• Implications 

• Tenants benefit from lower energy bills.

• Rent increases may not cover higher equipment cost

• Overall, tenants probably better off than suggested by LCC results

*SOURCE: Erica Myers, “Asymmetric Information in residential Rental Markets: Implications for the energy efficiency gap."

Energy Institute Haas School of Business, University of California, Working Paper WP 246, February 2015
2 | Building Technologies Office eere.energy.gov

Impact of Efficiency Standards on 

Rent

Rent pass through 50% of cost, assuming typical demand and supply elasticity (E s=.5, Ed =.5)

Rent pass through 0% of first cost, assuming totally inelastic supply (E s= 0)

Figure 1. S2

= S1+ investment cost

Housing S1

Rent

P2 investment cost

P1

D

Q2 Q1

Rental Housing Quantity

Rent pass through formula = -Es/(Es – Ed)

Equipment Cost

Equipment Cost
3 | Building Technologies Office eere.energy.gov

Probable Impact of Standards on Low 

Income Households – Summary Table

Housing 

Ownership

Average 

Annual 

Income 

(2009$)

Impact Efficiency Standards on tenants

Impact on 

Energy Bill

Impact of first 

Cost on Rent

Net Benefits 

Compared to 

LCC

Public Housing $7,385 Full savings Partial increase Underestimated 

Renters $9,340 Full savings Partial increase Underestimated

Owners $10,327 Full savings Full Same
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 08-2587

THOMAS SUTLIFFE; DONALD SISSON; LEO GRIMARD; NANCY LEE GRIMARD;

RENEE VICTORIA; EPPING RESIDENTS FOR PRINCIPLED GOVERNMENT, INC.,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

EPPING SCHOOL DISTRICT; TOWN OF EPPING; BARBARA D. MUNSEY,

Superintendent of Schools, Administrative Unit #14; HAROLD K.

LAPIERRE, Moderator, Town of Epping School District; SUSAN

MCGEOUGH, Member, Town of Epping Board of Selectmen; THOMAS

GAUTHIER, Member, Town of Epping Board of Selectmen; CHRISTOPHER

MURPHY, Member, Town of Epping Board of Selectmen; KIM SULLIVAN,

Member, Town of Epping Board of Selectmen; MARCI MORRIS, Chair,

Epping School Board; JEFFREY NOLLETT, Member, Epping School

Board; SUSAN KIMBALL, Member and Chair, Epping School Board;

PAMELA TIBBETTS, Member and Chair, Epping School Board; SCOTT

BOOTH, Member, Epping School Board; ROBERT LONEK, Member, Epping

School Board; JEFFREY LEDUC, Member, Epping School Board; MARK A.

VALLONE, Principal, Epping Elementary School,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on September 17, 2009, is

amended as follows:

On page 22, line 21, the case name "Pagán v. Claderón" should be

replaced with "Pagán v. Calderón" 

On page 33, footnote 8, line 5, the comma after "Broad." should

be deleted.