alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

★

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 39 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 

Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2009 

Ms. NORTON (for herself, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. HOYER, 

Mr. WOLF, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, 

Ms. EDWARDS of Maryland, Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia, and Mr. 

KRATOVIL) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District 

of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL 

4 GROUNDS FOR DC SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 

5 ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

6 On June 5, 2009, or on such other date as the Speak7 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

8 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly des9 ignate, the 2009 District of Columbia Special Olympics 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

HCON 39 IH1S 

1 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred 

2 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol 

3 Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics 

4 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum5 mer games. 

6 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

7 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as 

8 may be necessary to carry out the event. 

9 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA10 TIONS. 

11 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions 

12 for physical preparations for the event. 

13 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

14 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce15 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

16 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise17 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

18 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

19 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.32


                        CHANGE IN CONTROL PROTECTION PLAN
                FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS OF OPEN SOLUTIONS INC.

Upon a Change in Control of Open Solutions Inc. (the "Company") any stock
options and restricted stock awards previously granted to any non-employee
director shall be fully vested.

DEFINITIONS:

-    CHANGE IN CONTROL shall mean and be deemed to have occurred if (i) any
     "person" (as such term is used in Section 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), other than a trustee or other fiduciary
     holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company or a
     corporation owned directly or indirectly by the stockholders of the Company
     in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the
     Company, is or becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3
     under said Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company
     representing 35% or more of the total voting power represented by the
     Company's then outstanding voting securities, or (ii) during any period of
     12 consecutive months, individuals who at the beginning of such period
     constitute the Board of Directors of the Company and any new director whose
     election by the Board of Directors or nomination for election by the
     Company's stockholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3)
     of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the
     beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was
     previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute a majority
     thereof, or (iii) the stockholders of the Company approve a merger or
     consolidation of the Company with any other corporation or entity, other
     than a merger or consolidation that would result in the voting securities
     of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to
     represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into
     voting securities of the surviving entity) at least 80% of the total voting
     power represented by the voting securities of the Company or such surviving
     entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, or the
     stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the
     Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company, in one
     transaction or a series of transactions, of all or substantially all the
     Company's assets.
EX-10.5






Exhibit 10.5




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE NORTH AMERICAN COAL CORPORATION

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES

(As Amended and Restated as of December 1, 2007)




          The North American Coal Corporation hereby adopts this Amendment No. 1 to The North American
Coal Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Management Employees (As Amended and Restated as of
December 1, 2007) (the “Plan”), to be effective as of January 1, 2008. Words used herein with
initial capital letters which are defined in the Plan are used herein as so defined.




Section 1




          Article VI of the Plan is hereby amended by adding a new Section 6.04 to the end thereof, to
read as follows:




          “SECTION 6.04. Additional Payments.





     (a) At the time described in clause (b) of this Section 6.04, the Company shall pay to the
Participant who is a Covered Employee (i) an amount equal to the positive difference, if any, of
I minus II (the “Income Tax Payment”), plus (ii) an additional amount such that, after payment
by the Participant of all applicable federal, state and local income taxes and employment (e.g.,
FICA) taxes on the Income Tax Payment, the Participant will retain an amount equal to the Income
Tax Payment (the “Gross-Up Payment”). For purposes of this Section 6.04:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	I
	 	=
	 	The Participant’s federal, state and local income tax and
employment (e.g., FICA) tax liability with respect to the payment of the
amounts described in Section 6.01(c)(X) (his “Frozen Account Balance”); and
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	II
	 	=
	 	The amount of federal, state and local income tax
employment (e.g., FICA) tax liability the Participant would have incurred with
respect to the payment of the Participant’s Frozen Account Balance if the
Frozen Account Balance had been paid to the Participant during the 2008 Plan
Year.







For purposes of calculating the amounts described in I and II above and determining the Gross-Up
Payment, the Participant will be considered to pay (A) federal income taxes at the highest rate
in effect in the applicable year and (B) state and local income taxes at the highest rate in
effect in the state or locality in which the applicable payment would be subject to state or
local tax, net of the maximum reduction in federal income tax that could be obtained from
deduction of such state and local taxes. All determinations required to be made under this
Section 6.04 shall be made by the Company, after receiving applicable information from the
Participant.



1









 






     (b) The payment described in paragraph (a) of this Section 6.04 shall be made at the same
time as the payment described in Section 6.01(c)(X).”



EXECUTED this 11th day of November, 2008.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE NORTH AMERICAN COAL CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
Charles A. Bittenbender	 
	 	Title: 	Assistant Secretary	 
	 	 	 	 
	 




2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      14,100,580
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,100,580
<PP&E>                                     344,821,849
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,521,518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             381,710,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,003,830
<BONDS>                                    166,640,359
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,216
<OTHER-SE>                                 200,543,441
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               381,710,785
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            39,598,583
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,747,892
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,226,635
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,818,463
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,836,088
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         14,836,088
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,836,088
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS, BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       69,965
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      3,417
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          40,005
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   7,439
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,826
<COMMON>                                         1,213
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       39,234
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             20,545
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  60,992
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,446
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            21,824
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    1,029
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  35,535
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  120,826
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       52,861
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           (1,359)
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      48,472
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      47,113
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          4,389
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                            (12,038)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 (7,649)
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       (1,245)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,584)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         49
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  (7,584)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         2,392
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          11,870
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.03)


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CEO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Moller International (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange commission on the date hereof (the "Report), Paul S. Moller, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the Best of his knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: October
14, 2008






Signed:




/s/ Paul S.
Moller CEO and
President






-50-
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105

November22,2013

Ross Bell, Air Quality District Manager Shasta County Air Quality Management District 1855 Placer Street, Ste. 101 Redding, California 96001 

### Subject: Request to retain public documents atthe Shasta County AQMD for public inspection Dear Mr. Bell: Please retain the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's documents sentto you on November 7, 2013 at the Shasta County Air Quality Management District for at least 90 days, rather than sixty (60) days as stated inthe previous letter dated November 7, 2013, for public inspection. These documents contain the preliminary decision for the proposed Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant Deteriorationpermit for the expansion ofthe Sierra Pacific Industries facility located in**Anderson, Califo~a.**  We have extended the public commentperiod for this preliminary decision. A copy ofthe public notice regarding the extended public commentperiod is enclosed. Please contact me at (415) 947-4156 orkelly.shaheerah@epa.gov ifyou have any questions.

· Enclosure Shaheerah Kelly, Environment AirDivision, Permits Office
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 237 (Friday, December 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 77055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31408]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


Net Tel International, Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading

December 5, 2000.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Net Tel International, Inc. (``Net Tel'') because of questions 
regarding the accuracy of publicly disseminated information concerning, 
among other things, letters of intent to acquire businesses entered 
into by Net Tel.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above listed 
company is suspended for the period from 1:30 p.m. EST, December 5, 
2000, through 11:59 p.m. EST, on December 18, 2000.

    By the Commission.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-31408 Filed 12-6-00; 11:35 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
#### GROVE v. STATE.

No. 15126.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 8, 1932.

Albert Stein, of Houston, for appellant.

O’Brien Stevens, Crim. Dist. Atty., and E. T. Branch, both of Houston, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for possessing morphine; punishment, two years in the penitentiary. See article 720, P. C.

[ I ] The facts in this case show without dispute that appellant was in possession of morphine in the city of Houston. Appellant contends, as we understand him, that the evidence is not sufficient to support the conviction. We find nothing in the record bearing out such contention. Appellant’s car was searched with his consent, and a quantity of morphine found therein which he admitted to be his. This was put before the jury without objection. We find nothing indicating any defensive theory.

 It is contended that the venue was not proved. One of the presumptions on appeal is that the venue was established, and such presumption is binding upon us unless it appears from the record that this was made an issue in the court below, by which we understand is meant that the matter of venue must have been an issue during the trial of the case and before the verdict was reached. ,No such issue was made in the instant case. However, it appears from the testimony without dispute that the place where appellant was found in possession of the drug was in the city of Houston. We know judicially that Houston is the county seat of Harris county.

Einding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 

                          ADDVANTAGE MEDIA GROUP, INC.

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                          Year ended December 31, 1996

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                                Fully
                                                            Primary            Diluted
                                                       ----------------------------------
<S>                                                       <C>                 <C> 
Net income                                                $1,824,320         $1,824,320
Less preferred stock dividends (primary only)               (101,045)                --
Plus interest on unpaid preferred stock dividends                 --             42,257
                                                       ----------------------------------                      

Adjusted earnings                                          1,723,275          1,866,577

Weighted average shares outstanding                        5,095,434          5,095,434

Effect of options and warrants                               587,817            691,574
Effect of converting preferred stock, unpaid
    dividends and related interest                                --            360,698
                                                       ----------------------------------                      

Weighted average common, common equivalents
    and contingently issuable shares                       5,683,251          6,147,706
                                                       ----------------------------------                    

Earnings per share                                        $     0.30         $     0.30
                                                       ==================================                   
</TABLE>
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 10.1













Amendment (2) to Convertible Promissory Note

Dated August 1, 2007




The parties agree that the due date of the Convertible Promissory Note of Rival Technologies Inc., dated August 1, 2007 in the principal amount of USD $500,000 and including interest, is hereby extended from July 30, 2007 to March 31, 2009.  After March 31, 2009, any principal and interest remaining due and payable shall be paid by the Company to the Noteholder ON DEMAND.




All other terms, conditions and convenants contained therein remain in effect.




This Amendment may be signed in counterpart and delivered by facsimile.




Dated October 29, 2008.




Rival Technologies Inc.










Per: /s/ Douglas B. Thomas







Epsom Investment Services NV










Per: /s/ D. Craven
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2238 

To amend the Ohio & Erie Canal National Heritage Canalway Act of 1996 

to repeal the funding limitation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 14, 2017 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. PORTMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Ohio & Erie Canal National Heritage 

Canalway Act of 1996 to repeal the funding limitation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OHIO & ERIE NATIONAL HERITAGE CANALWAY. 

4 Section 810(a) of the Ohio & Erie National Heritage 

5 Canalway Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–333; 110 Stat. 

6 4275; 122 Stat. 826) is amended by striking the second 

7 sentence. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6158

CARL GREEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOHN LAMANNA, Warden of FPC Edgefield in his

official capacity,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (3:06-cv-02377-PMD)

Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 20, 2007

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Green, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Carl Green, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Green v. LaManna, No. 3:06-cv-02377-PMD (D.S.C. filed

Jan. 22, 2007; entered Jan. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Motion Granted; Abatement Order filed August 14, 2018 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-17-00708-CV

____________

FORUM US, INC., Appellant

V.

JEFFREY MUSSELWHITE, AUDIE ROMERO, ANTELOPE OIL TOOL & 

MFG. CO., LLC, INTERVALE CAPITAL, LLC, HKM 

CONSULTING, LLC AND WEARSOX, L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-60075

ABATEMENT ORDER

This is an appeal in which both parties have filed notices of appeal. The brief 

for appellant Forum US was filed May 18, 2018. The opening brief of appellees

Jeffrey Musselwhite, Audie Romero, Antelope Oil Tool & Mfg. Co., LLC, Intervale 

Capital, LLC, HKM Consulting, LLC and WearSox, L.P., was originally due June 

13, 2018. On August 9, 2018, appellees filed a third motion to extend time to file 
their opening brief, requesting an additional 30 days. Appellees’ motion is granted, 

and we issue the following order.

To facilitate the submission of this double appeal, the appeal is abated for all 

purposes except the filing of the parties’ briefs. Appellees’ opening brief is due on 

or before September 12, 2018. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active 

docket when full briefing is complete. The court will also consider an appropriate 

motion to reinstate the appeal filed by any party, or the court may reinstate the appeal 

on its own motion.

PER CURIAM