alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CollaGenex
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Colin W. Stewart, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Nancy C. Broadbent, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | /s/ Colin W. Stewart   
|Dated: August 9, 2004 |  | Colin W. Stewart       
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/ Nancy C. Broadbent 
|Dated: August 9, 2004 |  | Nancy C. Broadbent     
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
SANITIZED

 CN 3384A Structure
February 24, 2010 r-,-^ P --.,,,.„^__..,, 

The Honorable Ray LaHood ' 

Secretary , ^ 

United States Departqnent of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 

20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American ALrlinesJ.am writingHv^upport^jfT^rrrertcafTs 

application to provide new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International 

Airport and Los Angeles International Airport to Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last 

December in reaching a landmark Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up 

Haneda to service by U.S. airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New 

York and Los Angeles to Haneda in order to provide an essential connection between 

three of the world's largest financial and commerce centers. 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance 

membership, have underscored American's strong commitment to the trans-Pacific 

market. American is likewise committed to New York and Los Angeles - both vital focal 

points of business, trade, entertainment, technology and education - providing 

unsurpassed air service since the mid-1900s 

Both the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant economic benefits 

from these proposed pew flights, as will American's customers and employees. 

However, we need yqur help to make the JFK & LAX/Haneda connection a reality. 

Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its request for slots to 

fly from Kennedy and Los Angeles to Haneda! 

Sincerely, 

oj-/^-/O
<TABLE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

                              FINE HOST CORPORATION
                        Computation of Per Share Earnings


<CAPTION>


                                                            Three Months Ended                   Nine Months Ended
                                                     September 25,    September 27,     September 25,     September 27,
                                                           1996            1995              1996             1995
<S>                                                          <C>            <C>                <C>             <C>   

Income applicable to Common Stock                   $       1,399    $      1,045      $      1,908   $       1,327
Stock warrant accretion                                         -            (212)           (1,300)          (286)
                                                    -------------   -------------     -------------   -------------
Net income  available to Common
      Stockholders                                  $       1,399   $         833     $         608   $       1,041
                                                    =============   =============     =============   =============

Weighted average number of common shares
      outstanding                                       6,165,475       2,048,200         3,209,653       2,048,200
Average convertible Preferred shares
      outstanding                                               -         890,713           939,197         805,435
Assumed conversion of:
      Warrants                                                  -         405,402           292,502         405,402
      Options                                              83,194          19,090            83,420          19,090
                                                      -----------     -----------       -----------     -----------

Average number of shares of Common Stock
      outstanding assuming full dilution                6,248,669       3,363,405         4,524,772       3,278,127
                                                        =========       =========         =========       =========

Net earnings  per share assuming full dilution              $.22            $.25               $.13          $.32
                                                            ====            ====               ====          ====

</TABLE>



<PAGE>
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Numerex Corp (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”), I, Alan B. Catherall, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
      that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates
      and periods covered by the Report.




This
      certificate is being furnished solely pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
      is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document,
      and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason
      other than as specifically required by law.




Date:
      March 13, 2006


*/s/
      Alan B. Catherall*


Alan
      B.
      Catherall


Chief
      Financial Officer


Executive
      Vice President, and


Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Natural Resources Conservation Service

# AGENCY:

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of proposed changes in section IV of the FOTG of the NRCS in Oregon for review and comment.

# SUMMARY:

It is the intention of NRCS in Oregon to issue revisions to Conservation Practice Standards 327, Conservation Cover, and 328, Conservation Crop Rotation, in section IV of the State Technical Guide in Oregon. These practices may be used in conservation systems that treat highly erodible land.

# DATES:

Comments will be received until on or before January 8, 2001. Once the review and comment period is over and the standards are finalized, they will be placed in the individual Field Office Technical Guide in each field office.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Address all requests and comments to Roy M. Carlson, Jr., Leader for Technology, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 101 SW Main Street, Suite 1300, Portland, Oregon 97204. Copies of these standards will be made available upon written request. You may submit electronic requests and comments to                         *roy.carlson@or.usda.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Roy M. Carlson, Jr., 503-414-3231.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after enactment of the law, to NRCS state technical guides used to carry out highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law, shall be made available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days, the NRCS in Oregon will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. Following that period, a determination will be made by the NRCS in Oregon regarding disposition of those comments and a final determination of changes will be made. In Oregon, “technical guides” refers to the Field Office Technical Guide maintained at each NRCS Field Office in Oregon.

Dated: December 4, 2000.

Roy M. Carlson, Jr.,

Acting State Conservationist, Portland, Oregon.

[FR Doc. 00-31338 Filed 12-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-16-U
TS- AMID30

Attachment #2

Summary of Information on the New Chemical Substance s
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2091 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2091

  To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to provide relief 
    from surcharges to small businesses and nonprofit organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 7, 2017

  Mr. Wicker introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to provide relief 
    from surcharges to small businesses and nonprofit organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Surcharge Relief 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RELIEF FROM SURCHARGE.

    Section 1308A(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 
U.S.C. 4015a(a)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``The 
        Administrator'' and inserting the following:
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
        Administrator''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Relief for small businesses and nonprofits.--
                    ``(A) Definition.--In this paragraph, the term 
                `covered small business or nonprofit organization' 
                means a small business concern (as defined in section 3 
                of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)) or an 
                organization that is described in section 501(c)(3) of 
                the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and is exempt from 
                taxation under section 501(a) of such Code that owns 
                not fewer than 3 structures that are located on a 
                single property.
                    ``(B) Relief.--The Administrator may not impose a 
                surcharge under this section for a policy for flood 
                insurance coverage under the National Flood Insurance 
                Program for a covered small business concern or 
                nonprofit organization with respect to more than 2 
                detached units or buildings located on a single 
                property if the covered small business or nonprofit 
                organization certifies to the Administrator that the 
                savings from the surcharge not being imposed shall be 
                used for flood mitigation on the property on which the 
                units or buildings are located.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Joan Matthews, Respondent, v County of Nassau, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Goldstein, J.), dated November 9, 1988, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $210,000.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the complaint is dismissed.

As a volunteer worker at the Nassau County Fine Arts Museum, the plaintiff was entitled to workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to the Nassau County Administrative Code *545§ 2105 (b) for job-related injuries. At trial it was established that the plaintiff was generally scheduled to volunteer her services at the museum gift shop on Tuesdays and Fridays. While the accident occurred on a Thursday, the plaintiff testified that she had come to the museum that day because she had been asked to meet with Ann Ellis, a member of the museum staff, to discuss the gift shop where she volunteered. While she was waiting for Ellis to arrive, the plaintiff made herself coffee in a kitchen, apparently available to employees, and conversed with Ellis’s secretary. Shortly thereafter, the plaintiff agreed to get a telephone number from the gift shop for a museum bookkeeper. Clearly, the plaintiff was present at the museum and performing services as a volunteer when she went to retrieve the telephone number. Further, "[t]he record is devoid of proof showing any deviation from employment at the time of the accident” *(Murray v City of New York,*43 NY2d 400, 406). Specifically, the plaintiff testified that she slipped and fell in the hallway while she was returning from the errand for the bookkeeper. Moreover, the plaintiff’s notice of claim, which was verified by her, and the museum incident report, both indicated that the accident occurred while the plaintiff was acting as a volunteer at the museum. It is further noted that a week after the accident, the executive director of the Nassau County Office of Cultural Affairs notified the plaintiff by letter that as a volunteer, she was entitled to workers’ compensation benefits.

Consequently, under the circumstances herein, the trial court should have granted the defendant’s motion at the conclusion of the case for judgment during trial dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff failed to present prima facie proof that her injury was not job related *(see, e.g., Murray v City of New York, supra,*at 407).

In light of this determination, the other issues raised by the defendant and the other contentions raised by the plaintiff in support of an affirmance need not be addressed. Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Balletta, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,445,206               6,445,206
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  133,256                 133,256
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,507                  27,507
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,919,859               6,919,859
<PP&E>                                       3,472,689               3,472,689
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,221,963               1,221,963
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,150,079              23,150,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,440,265               2,440,265
<BONDS>                                      2,674,602               2,674,602
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  9,988,714               9,988,714
<COMMON>                                    52,852,839              52,852,839
<OTHER-SE>                                (35,816,498)            (35,816,498)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,150,079              23,150,079
<SALES>                                        645,693               1,126,908
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               645,693               1,126,908
<CGS>                                          602,079               1,143,397
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,535,872               9,930,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                 127,083
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             630,910                 547,993
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,166,782)            (10,621,901)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,166,782)            (10,621,901)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                     (29,173)             (4,420,486)
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,195,955)            (15,042,369)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.70)                  (2.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.70)                  (2.41)


</TABLE>
Subpart W Stakeholders Conference Call

October 17, 2013

ATTENDEES

EPA: Reid Rosnick, Susan Stahle

Environmental Groups: Sarah Fields, Uranium Watch; Jennifer Thurston, INFORM

Uranium Industry/Other: Kim Morrison, Energy Fuels: Steve Cohen, Darryl Liles, Randy 

Weider, SENES

UPDATE 

Reid began the call with a welcome and by taking attendance. Reid had one item to share. We 

have been addressing the OMB comments and will be scheduling a briefing for the OMB desk 

officer soon. The responses to the comments consist of language changes to the preamble, further 

clarification of some issues in the Background Information Document and Economic Impact 

Analysis and some legal authority questions from an Interagency review of the package. We 

continue to be on track for a proposed rule in last autumn, although the government shutdown 

slowed our progress. Reid will update the expected date of proposal on the website.

DISCUSSION

Sarah Fields: Have you requested comments on the proposal from Agreement States, Utah in 

particular? Have you communicated with the NRC? Have you followed the process for a NEPA 

review?

Reid: We have not specifically requested comment from Agreement States. Our process to this 

point is internal to the federal government. However, when the rule is proposed, we welcome 

comments from all stakeholders, including Agreement States. We have a communication plan in 

place to make sure we reach as many stakeholders as possible. We will not just publish the 

proposal in the Federal Register and not tell anyone about it. Yes, we have communicated 

informally with the NRC over the past few years on the status of the proposal.

Susan Stahle: We are currently involved with OMB through their interagency review process. 

There are two processes for receiving comments on this proposal. EPA does not run this first 

process; OMB is currently in charge of receiving comments from other federal agencies. The 

individual agencies are not identified to EPA. It is possible that if OMB has requested comment 

on the package from NRC, NRC may have requested comments from pertinent Agreement 

States. We would not know of such an activity since OMB, and not EPA, is in charge of this 

review process. 

The second process for receiving comment is EPA’s notice of proposed rulemaking where we

publish notice of the proposed rule and ask for comment. We welcome all comments from any

stakeholder.
This rulemaking is not subject to a NEPA review. This is a rulemaking under the Clean Air Act, 

and is exempted from the NEPA review process. (NOTE: Sarah Fields and Susan Stahle had an 

email exchange on this issue. You can find that exchange in the email section of the website))

Jennifer Thurston: Want to reiterate posting of OMB comments/responses on Subpart W 

website.

Reid: When we are ready to publish the proposal, we will post OMB’s comments/responses on 

the website, and they will also be in the Subpart W docket.

Next call: Thursday, January 2, 2014 at 11 AM Eastern Time.

___________________________________end____________________________________