alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Principal Executive Officer)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2006 of AirNet Systems, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    [Reserved];c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Dated: August 9, 2006
    
    By:
    /s/ Joel E. BiggerstaffPrinted Name: Joel E. BiggerstaffTitle: Chairman of the Board, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
   </LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001012366
<NAME>                        Physician's Information Exchange, Inc.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         193,939
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               210,172
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          620,013
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       75,665
<OTHER-SE>                                     (484,656)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   211,022
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               738,174
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (738,174)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (738,174)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (738,174)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), , David T. Hung, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of Medivation, Inc.
(the Company), and C. Patrick Machado, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

(1) The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 11, 2008

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set his hand hereto as of the 11th day of August, 2008.



|                        |  |                                       |  |                        |  |        |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David T. Hung, M.D. |  |                                       |  | /s/ C. Patrick Machado
|Name:                   |  | David T. Hung, M.D.                   |  |                        |  | Name:  |  | C. Patrick Machado                               
|Title:                  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer |  |                        |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Medivation, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form
10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 



29
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 33-96294) and on Form S-4 (No. 333-75154) of CAREY
INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES INCORPORATED of our report dated March 15, 2002
relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Annual
Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form
10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
March 15, 2002 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in
this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
March 27, 2002


                                      -43-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998             DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1997             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998             JUN-27-1997
<CASH>                                           6,801                  29,394
<SECURITIES>                                         0                  28,675
<RECEIVABLES>                                  195,793                 123,717
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,343)                 (1,892)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               221,020                 188,066
<PP&E>                                          45,406                  25,622
<DEPRECIATION>                                (14,171)                 (6,868)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 361,424                 255,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          135,855                  54,920
<BONDS>                                          3,905                   2,304
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         4,726                   4,726
<OTHER-SE>                                     210,654                 191,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   361,424                 255,198
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               371,831                 270,625
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  246,461                 189,811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               103,566                  62,043
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,872                  19,528
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,848                   7,720
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,024                  11,808
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,024                  11,808
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09                    0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09                    0.21
        

</TABLE>
Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on November 29, 1999, Ganes Chemicals Inc., Industrial Park Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed below:

The firm plans to manufacture the controlled substances for distribution as bulk products to its customers.

Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration.

Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than April 10, 2000.

Dated: February 2, 2000.

John H. King,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-3147  Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
### RE: Revised A**rea Source Boiler Preamble and Rule**

**Higgins, Cortney** to

: Mary Johnson 12/20/2012 12:14 PM Cc : RobertJ W ayland, Thomas Gillis, Jim Eddinger From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: Mary Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: RobertJ W ayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

### Hi Mary, We have no further edits the area source rule. Can you send me the final clean version? Thanks, Cortney **From:** Johnson.Mary@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Johnson.Mary@epamail.epa.gov ] **Sent:** Wednesday, December 19, 2012 3:11 PM **To:** Higgins, Cortney **Cc:** Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov ; Gillis.Thomas@epamail.epa.gov ; Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov ; Mason.Keith@epamail.epa.gov ; Averback.Jonathan@epamail.epa.gov **Subject:** Revised Area Source Boile r Preamble and Rule Cortney, Attached is a redline version of the Area Source Boiler preamble/rule. It shows the changes made from the version sent to you on 12/17/2012. 

### (S ee attached file: EO 12866 NESHAP for Area Sources ICI Boilers 2060

- AR14_Redline_ 121712_v_121912.docx) Thanks. Mary Mary Johnson Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Mail Code D 243
- 01 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: (919) 541
- 5025 Fax: (919) 541
- 5450
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the amended Annual Report of USCorp (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Dultz, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Robert Dultz
              Robert
                Dultz
              Chief
                Executive Officer




Date:
      December 30, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
Swift Energy Managed Pension Assets Partners 1990-D, Ltd., was in the process of
liquidation as of December 31, 1997 and as such is governed by liquidation basis
accounting.  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Swift Energy Managed Pension Assets  Partners  1990-D,  Ltd.'s  Statement of Net
Assets in  Process  of  Liquidation  and  Statement  of Changes in Net Assets in
Process of Liquidation in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         228,918
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  91,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               320,840
<PP&E>                                         447,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 768,631
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,076
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,076
<SALES>                                        6,923
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,923
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses and production taxes. Excludes general and
administrative and interest expense.
</FN>


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Decker, Malveaux and Senior Judge Annunziata 

KARA NATONIA THOMAS 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 0918-16-2 PER CURIAM 

 OCTOBER 11, 2016 

HALLMARK SYSTEMS, INC. AND 

 LM INSURANCE CORPORATION 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Brody Reid; ReidGoodwin, PLC, on brief), for appellant. 

(Imie Aisiku Harber; Law Offices of Christopher R. Costabile, on 

brief), for appellees. 

 Kara Natonia Thomas (appellant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Commission. She alleges the Commission erred in its application of the burden of proof to her 

impairment rating claim and in denying her claim for permanent partial disability. We have 

reviewed the record and the Commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Commission in its opinion. See Thomas v. 

Hallmark Sys., Inc., JCN VA00000868783 (Va. Wrk. Comp. May 5, 2016). We dispense with 

oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed. 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

UNPUBLISHED
Summary fo Compensation for our Interim Chief Executive Officer




EXHIBIT 10.14







Trico Marine Services, Inc.




Summary of Compensation—Interim Chief Executive Officer




Effective April 8, 2005, Joseph S. Compofelice, Trico Marine Services, Inc.’s Interim Chief Executive Officer, will receive $15,417 in compensation per month for the period in which he serves as Interim Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Compofelice also received 5,000 restricted shares of common stock of Trico Marine Services, Inc. in additional compensation on May 5, 2005.
#### ROACH v. STATE.

No. 20835.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 7, 1940.

Willis & Via, of Pampa, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is passing a forged instrument. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

Appellant complains of the court’s action in declining to instruct the jury on the law of circumstantial evidence, or to give his requested instruction on the subject. We are of the opinion that under the evidence he was entitled to such an instruction, because no witness testified to having seen appellant forge the check of heard him say that he forged the same. There was no direct testimony from any source that appellant had knowledge that the check was a forged one; nor is there any evidence that it was in his handwriting. The fact that the check was not made by the company whose act it purports to be is not shown by any direct evidence, but is to be inferred from the testimony of the sheriff and the injured party, who testified that they made some inquiry in Moore County, but could not find any company by that name. Consequently, the conclusion that appellant forged the check or knew it was forged is but an inference arising from the testimony.

This court seems to have uniformly held that although there is direct proof of passing a forged instrument, it will not relieve the trial court from charging the jury on the law of circumstantial evidence when the case is one for passing a forged instrument, and especially is this true when the evidence of forgery, as well as the knowledge thereof on the part of the accused, depends on circumstantial evidence. See Nichols v. State, 39 Tex.Cr.R. 80, 44 S.W. 1091; Verner v. State, 117 Tex.Cr.R. 112, 35 S.W.2d 428; Mixon v. State, 129 Tex.Cr.R. 584, 90 S.W.2d 832, and authorities.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.