alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                       Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
Genesis Health Ventures, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 which register shares of your Common Stock issued under the Amended
and Restated Employee Stock Option Plan and the 1992 Stock Option Plan for
Non-Employee Directors of Genesis Health Ventures, Inc., of our reports dated
November 19, 1997 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Genesis
Health Ventures, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1997 and 1996 and
the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30,
1997 and the related schedule, which reports appear in Amendment No. 1 to the
September 30, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Genesis Health Ventures, Inc.

                                                         KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
January 21, 1997
SCPR-16-0000035
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

IN RE MARIA JEAN SULLIVAN, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C
. J
. , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J
. )

Upon consideration of Petitioner Maria Jean Sullivan’s petition to resign and surrender her license to practice law in the State of Hawai # i, filed pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai # i (RSCH), and of the affidavits and exhibits in support thereof,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g), that Petitioner shall, to the extent that she has not heretofore done so, comply with the notice, affidavit, and record requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the name of Petitioner Maria Jean Sullivan, attorney number 8102, from the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai # i, effective with the filing of this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, February 9, 2016. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPR-16-0000035 09-FEB-2016 08:36 AM
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Ilester Carter, Appellant

No. 06

- 12

- 00125

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 124th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 39661

- B ). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We no te that the appellant, Ilester Carter, has adequately indicated his inability to pay
costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 20, 2012 BY O RDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
NUMBER 13-11-00544-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN THE ESTATE OF ROSE MARIE WENDLANDT, DECEASED

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza 

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This appeal was abated by this Court on February 9, 2012, due to the bankruptcy 

of one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; see generally TEX. R. APP. P. 

8. Since the abatement there has been no activity in this appeal. On November 1, 

2013, the Court ordered the parties to file an advisory regarding the status of the appeal 

and, if applicable, a motion to reinstate the appeal or a motion to dismiss the appeal. 

The order notified the parties that failure to respond to the order would result in 

reinstatement and dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. 
2

The parties have failed to respond. Accordingly, we reinstate and dismiss the 

appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). Any pending motions are 

dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

12th day of December, 2013.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Webb Interactive Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period endedJune 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William R. Cullen, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|   | (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and               |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. |

|   | /s/ William R. Cullen                           |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | William R. Cullen                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | Chief Executive and Chief Financial                                                                                                                                               |
|   | Officer                                                                                                                                                                           |
|   | August 14, 2002                                                                                                                                                                   |
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 195 

To expedite the deployment of highway construction projects. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2017 

Mr. FLAKE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To expedite the deployment of highway construction projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transportation Invest5 ment Recalibration to Equality Act’’ or the ‘‘TIRE Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR HIGH7 WAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 113 of title 23, United 

9 States Code, is repealed. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

11 (1) Section 106(d)(1) of title 23, United States 

12 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘113 or’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 195 IS

1 (2) Section 610(h)(1) of title 23, United States 

2 Code, is amended in the undesignated matter fol3 lowing subparagraph (B) by striking ‘‘sections 113 

4 and 114’’ and inserting ‘‘section 114’’. 

5 (3) Section 1420(b)(1) of the FAST Act (23 

6 U.S.C. 101 note; Public Law 114–94) is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘113 or’’. 

8 (4) Section 1511(i)(1) of the Transportation 

9 Equity Act for the 21st Century (23 U.S.C. 601 

10 note; Public Law 105–178) is amended in the un11 designated matter following subparagraph (B) by 

12 striking ‘‘sections 113 and 114’’ and inserting ‘‘sec13 tion 114’’. 

14 (5) The analysis for chapter 1 of title 23, 

15 United States Code, is amended by striking the item 

16 relating to section 113. 

17 (c) APPLICABILITY.—This Act and the amendments 

18 made by this Act shall apply only to projects that com19 mence on or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 03-14-00722-CR OFFENSE: 22.02

STYLE: Mark Fruge v. The State ofTexas COUNTY: Travis

OV3-/fc

0¥¥-/fc

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 331st District Court

DATE: 12/3/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: D-l-DC-13-200256

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OV3-/6

STYLE: Mark Fruge v. The State of Texas a ¥5"- it*

Petition

CCA#:

PRO S£ CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

fce/v*^ JUDGE:

DATE: £>s/fi W*OM

JUDGE: IIILt#U**-*

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
```
**EXHIBIT 21**
```

```
                SUBSIDIARIES OF JONES APPAREL GROUP, INC.

                                                   State or County
Name                                               of Incorporation
-----------------------------------------------    ----------------

Apparel Testing Services, Inc.                     New Jersey
Camisas de Juarez, S.A. de C.V.                    Mexico
CNC West Division Mexico, S.A. de C.V.             Mexico
Exportex de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                   Mexico
Greater Durango, S. de R.L. de C.V.                Mexico
Import Technology of Texas, Inc.                   Texas
JAG Management Services, Inc.                      Delaware
Jones Apparel Group Canada Inc.                    Canada
Jones Apparel Group Holdings, Inc.                 Delaware
Jones Apparel Group USA, Inc.                      Pennsylvania
Jones Apparel of Texas, Ltd.                       Texas
Jones Factor Company                               Delaware
Jones International Limited                        Hong Kong
Jones Investment Co. Inc.                          Delaware
Jones Management Service Company                   Delaware
Jones Retail Corporation                           New Jersey
Manufacturera Sun Apparel, S. de R.L. de C.V.      Mexico
Maquilas Pami, S.A. de C.V.                        Mexico
McNaughton Apparel Group Inc.                      Delaware
Nine West Accessories (HK) Limited                 Hong Kong
Nine West Australia Pty Ltd.                       Australia
Nine West Canada Corporation                       Canada
Nine West Development Corporation                  Delaware
Nine West Footwear Corporation                     Delaware
Nine West Group Italy S.r.l.                       Italy
Nine West Melbourne Pty. Ltd                       Australia
Nine West Servicos de Assessoria de Compras Ltda.  Brazil
Norton McNaughton of Squire, Inc.                  New York
Sun Apparel, Inc.                                  Delaware
Victoria + Co International Ltd.                   Delaware
Victoria + Co Ltd.                                 Rhode Island
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
DECEMBER 31, 1996 BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,575,350
<SECURITIES>                                12,878,526
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,798,919
<ALLOWANCES>                                   388,471
<INVENTORY>                                  4,035,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,914,572
<PP&E>                                       9,581,726
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,873,975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,809,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,219,598
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,842
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,322,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,809,107
<SALES>                                     40,152,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            40,152,897
<CGS>                                       21,819,544
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,316,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,389
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             210,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,293,420
<INCOME-TAX>                                   231,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,062,420
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,062,420
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.96
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2255

LOUIS J. DE MAIO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LLOYD BENTSEN, Secretary, Department of the

Treasury,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-94-

3474-MJG)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 14, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis J. De Maio, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Joseph Peters, Sr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his Title VII action. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. De Maio v.

Bentsen, No. CA-94-3474-MJG (D. Md. June 6, 1995). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)

I, David T. Hung, M.D., certify that:

1. I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Medivation, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report.

Date: August 20, 2010



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ David T. Hung, M.D.
|Name:                   |  | David T. Hung, M.D.                  
|Title:                  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet of Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership as of September 30, 2000
and the related Statements of Operations and Cash Flows and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001011977
<NAME> ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,934
<SECURITIES>                                     2,937
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,320
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,365)
<INVENTORY>                                        459
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,038
<PP&E>                                         136,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (75,310)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 127,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,304
<BONDS>                                        156,439
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (56,477)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   127,954
<SALES>                                         24,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,022
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,434
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,525
<INCOME-TAX>                                       155
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,370
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,370
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
#### Spuhler, Appellant, *v.*City of Cleveland et al., Appellees.

(No. 28557

Decided March 26, 1941.)

*Mr. Irwin Greene,*for appellant.

*Mr. BLenry 8. Brainard,*director of law, *Mr. Arthur E. Griffith*and *Mr. Theodore E. Schwartz,*for appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Williams, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.

Turner, J., dissents.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (No. 333-79241), Form S-8 (No. 333-28481) and Form S-8 (No. 333-28527)
of MedImmune, Inc. of our report dated January 26, 2000, except for Note 21, for
which the date is February 17, 2000, relating to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules which appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


McLean, Virginia
March 13, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 Company Report
 1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:

/s/ STEVEN L. KELLERName:
    Steven L. KellerTitle:
    Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    November 9, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2122 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2122

  To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 regarding reasonable 
                    break time for nursing mothers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 14, 2017

 Mr. Merkley (for himself, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Markey, Mr. Blumenthal, 
Ms. Warren, Mrs. Gillibrand, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Casey, Mr. Wyden, and Mr. 
   Franken) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 regarding reasonable 
                    break time for nursing mothers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting Working Moms Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. REASONABLE BREAK TIME FOR NURSING MOTHERS.

    Section 13(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
213(a)) is amended by striking ``sections 6 (except section 6(d) in the 
case of paragraph (1) of this subsection) and 7'' and inserting 
``sections 6 and 7 (except sections 6(d) and 7(r) in the case of 
paragraph (1) of this subsection)''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2190 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2190

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to remove a limitation on funding 
  for emergency assistance for livestock, honey bees, and farm-raised 
                     fish, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 4, 2017

 Ms. Heitkamp introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to remove a limitation on funding 
  for emergency assistance for livestock, honey bees, and farm-raised 
                     fish, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Livestock and Honey Bee Disaster 
Assistance Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOR LIVESTOCK, HONEY BEES, AND FARM-RAISED 
              FISH.

    Section 1501(d) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 9081(d)) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``not more than 
        $20,000,000'' and inserting ``such sums as are necessary''; and
            (2) by striking paragraph (3).

SEC. 3. COST-SHARE PAYMENTS UNDER EMERGENCY CONSERVATION PROGRAM DURING 
              EXTREME DROUGHT.

    The Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 is amended by inserting after 
section 403 (16 U.S.C. 2203) the following:

``SEC. 403A. COST-SHARE PAYMENTS UNDER EMERGENCY CONSERVATION PROGRAM 
              DURING EXTREME DROUGHT.

    ``The maximum cost-share percentage under section 701.126(a) of 
title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations), shall 
be 90 percent in the case of an area that has been identified by the 
United States Drought Monitor as experiencing extreme or exceptional 
drought.''.
                                 <all>
```
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00219-CV

IN THE MATTER OF P.C. §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 323rd District 

Court

of Tarrant County (323-121134-23)

November 9, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

 Justice Dabney Bassel