alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Select Futures Fund L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by
references to such financial instruments.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                     154,784,007
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,898,480<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             167,588,012<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               167,588,012<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,046,523<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,632,482
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,414,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,414,041
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,414,041
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include subscription receivable of $5,365,420 and interest
receivable of $533,060.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
gain on open contracts of $6,477,994, net option premium paid of $18,205
and due from DWR of $409,326.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $2,370,157, accrued incentive
fees of $348,459, accrued management fees of $403,858, accrued transaction
fees and costs of $64,595, accrued brokerage commissions (DWR) of $491,315
and common administrative expenses payable of $123,343.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $26,876,393, net
change in unrealized of ($10,950,217) and interest income of $6,120,347.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Bexar County, Texas, The

City of San Antonio, Texas

and Northeast Independent

School



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 11, 2013

N o. 04

- 12

- 00820

- CV and 04

- 12

- 00871

- CV

WATERS AT NORTHERN HILLS, LLC and Lynn Commun ities, Inc.

, Appellant s

v.

BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, The City of San Antonio, Texas

and Northeast Independent School District

,

Appellee s

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 07543 and 2012

- CI

- 18564

Honorable Fred Shannon, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

L uz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Appellant's unopposed motion for extension of time to file reply brief is hereby

GRANTED. Appellant's reply brief is deemed filed as of June 7, 2013.

It is so ORDERED on June 11, 2013.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED T O:

_________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132035 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132035 

 COA: 268245

 Lenawee CC: 02-009793-FC 

CORDALL R. NEAL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
Order entered October 27, 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 01664

- CR

LEMUEL MOSLEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F

- 1157352

- I



### O RDER

The Court GRANTS the State’s motion to extend time to file its appellate brief. The

State’s brief received on October 24, 2014 is ORDERED filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

PRESIDING JUSTICE
Motion Granted; Order filed July 28, 2022

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 21

- 00492

- CR

____________ JOSHUA OFARON WILLIAMS , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 209th District Court

Harris County, Te xas Trial Court Cause No. 1632019



### ORDER

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion requesting to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Ander s v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is granted.Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 209th District Court to afford

appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accorda nce with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before August 12 , 2022 ; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file h is pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Wilson.
Order entered October 7 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00319
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF A.B.B., A CHILD On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court

Dalla s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JC
- 17
- 00832

ORDER By letter filed October 2, 2020, appellant informs the Court that the reporter’s record that has been filed in this appeal does not include the exhibits that were admitted into evidence. We constru e the letter as a motion to supplement the reporter’s record . We GR ANT the motion and ORDER Pamela K. Sumler, Official Court Reporter for the 305 th Judicial District Court, to file, no later than October 1 9 , 2020, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of the three exhibits admitted into evidence at the February 7, 2020 bill of review hearing. On our own motion, we EXTEND THE DEADLINE for filing appellant’s brief to October 2 9 , 2020.We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order t o Ms.

Sumler and the parties.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
AAM-12-363-E 

May 29, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10075A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0501 

Mr. Corie Bennett 

Vice President and Chief Operating Officer 

JB Aviation, LLC 

P.O. Box 625 

Purchase, NY 10577 

Dear Mr. Bennett: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10075. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

On May 9, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of JB 

Aviation, LLC (JB Aviation), for an extension of Exemption No. 10075. That exemption 

from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows JB Aviation to cover 

its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to JB Aviation. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10075 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 
2 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701 which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the conditions and limitations described 

below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of JB Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times 

while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

 2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

 JB Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
#### CHANEY v. STATE.

No. 16087.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 31, 1933.

W. E. Martin, of Abilene, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*107HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary of a private residence; punishment assessed being ten years in the penitentiary.

The indictment charges the offense. The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In- such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 18-0305

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

RANDEL J. WOODY,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Luke Berger, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 12 2020

08/12/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0305
regula~ions.go v 

Your comment was submitted successfully~ 

The Federal .Wetlon Admlnlllnlllon (fAA) other: U.S. DQTIFM-Reg!ml for A4fdlt!OI'Jilllnfomlatlon 

Far llllated lntbnnatlon, OMP !lsv;!ret Fqlder ~ 

@ Your Receipt 

Your Comment Tracking 

Number: tJz ll.a-tmwc 

Yow comment may be viewable O?l 

Regulations.gov once t:1t.e agency 1w.s 

relriswed it. This process is dependent 

on a.geru:y public submission 

policies/procedures and processing 

times. u~ your traclcing monber to 

find out the status ofyov:rcomm.ent • 

./ Yoll' email receipt was sert successUy 

Yourcorrrnent 

Comment 

see attached response to request for more irtotmation (previously sent 

7123115) 

Uploaded Flle(s) (OpUor181) 

• AMMENDMENT -Request for Section 333 Eloemption Photography.pclt 

success 

This lnforma1Jon WII appear on 

RegulatloM.gov: 

First Name: 

Dan 

La8tName: 

Skaggs 

This ~•11on \1111 not appear on 

Regulatlona.gov: 

All lnfonnatlon 'IIIII be displayed 

on Regu/atJons.gov 

112 
712412015 Regllations.gov- Yar Receipt 

ttlp11w.wi.regulations.g0\l#!slbritcorrrnent;D=FAA-201S.1052-0002;p=1 212
I NI TIAL REVIEW ENGI NEERI NG REPORT 

PMN : 15- 0098 

Standard Revi ew Draf t 2/5/2015 

ENGI NEER : H 

-

-
SAT (concerns) (12/23/2014) : 

Re l ated C 

Analogs : 

Migratio 

PBT rati ng : P2B1Tl 

Health : 1- 2 Dermal , I nha l ati on 

Eco : 2 Water (Al l rel eases to water wi th a CC 

(Testi ng 

desired) 

99 ppb), XB Testing 
OCCUPATI ONAL EXPOSURE RAT I NG : 2 - 3A 

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTI ONS : 

Generated by the 09/30/2013 versi on o f ChemSTEER . 



I

NI TIAL REVIEW ENGINEERI NG REPORT 

PMN : 15-0 098 

-


I 

I 

-
I

NI TIAL REVIEW ENGINEERI NG REPORT 

PMN : 15-0 098 

-
I 

I 

-
-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
  
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              mar-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                         2,061,696
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  27,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    199,654
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,288,835
<PP&E>                                         7,350
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,636,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9,262
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    7,500
<COMMON>                                       308
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,619,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,636,635
<SALES>                                        154,125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               154,125
<CGS>                                          117,797
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  75,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,154)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (48,303)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (48,303)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (48,303)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.02)
        


</TABLE>
Sanitized Copy

Sanitized Copy

Attachment 4

GPC Slice Table
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-55482) pertaining to the Celtrix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1991 Stock
Option Plan and 1991 Directors' Stock Option Plan, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-42703) pertaining to the Celtrix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1991
Stock Option Plan, 1991 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and 1991 Directors' Stock
Option Plan and in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 33-66008 and No.
333-27263) of Celtrix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated April 26, 1996
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Celtrix
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended March 31, 1997.



                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
June 23, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2053 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2053

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to increase the maximum amount of 
    assistance authorized under supplemental agricultural disaster 
                          assistance programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 1, 2017

   Mr. Moran introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to increase the maximum amount of 
    assistance authorized under supplemental agricultural disaster 
                          assistance programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT LIMITATION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL AGRICULTURAL DISASTER 
              ASSISTANCE.

    Section 1501(f)(2) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 
9081(f)(2)) is amended by striking ``$125,000'' and inserting 
``$250,000''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Silo Adames, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demakos, J.), rendered November 1, 1982, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and statements made by him to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Since the statements allegedly made by the defendant were never introduced at trial, his contention that they were the product of an arrest made without probable cause is academic for purposes of this appeal *(see, People v Smith,*160 AD2d 472; *People v Wilson,*131 AD2d 526).

Additionally, we find that the defendant lacks standing to challenge the search of the apartment of his in-laws in which the murder weapon was found, as he only occasionally stayed in that apartment and did not have his own room there *(see, People v Ponder,*54 NY2d 160; *People v Bostick,*151 AD2d 768; *People v McGaha,*144 AD2d 388; *People v Glenn,*140 AD2d 623). In any event, the police relied in good faith upon the apparent authority of a resident of the apartment who gave consent to the search *(see, People v Adams,*53 NY2d 1, *cert denied*454 US 854; *People v Bostick, supra; People v Anderson,*146 AD2d 638).

Further, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court did not err in admitting testimony regarding a previous altercation between the defendant and the victim, since this evidence was properly admissible to show motive *(see, People v Molineux,*168 NY 264; *People v Moore,*122 AD2d 232). Any claim that the court should have given a limiting instruction with respect to this evidence is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]).

Finally, we reject the defendant’s assertion that the trial court unfairly marshaled the evidence during its charge. The court’s failure to refer to all of the defendant’s contentions did not deprive him of a fair trial *(see, People v Saunders,*64 *624NY2d 665, 667). In this regard, we note that the trial was of brief duration and involved relatively simple issues, and that the court informed the jury that it had no opinion in the case *(see, People v Glenn,*160 AD2d 813; *People v Gray,*144 AD2d 483). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Order entered August 2, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 01359
- CR
MAC A. DEGRAFFINRIED , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15050738
- 86
- F



### O RDER Appellant’s brief was initially due May 5, 2017. We granted two motions to extend time ; after granting the second motion, we cautioned appellant that the failure to file his brief by July 17 would result in the appeal being abated for a hearing under rule 38.8. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 38.8(b)(2). To date, no brief has been filed and appellant has had no communication with the
Court. Therefore, the Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is in digent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, thetrial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708

(Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel

. We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Bla ir Casey, Presiding Judge, 86th Judicial District Court ; John Daniel Oliphant, Jr., and the Kaufman County District Attorney Erleigh Wiley. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thir ty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
               Financial Statement Data 
     As of and For the Period Ended June 30, 1997 
           (In Thousands, Except Share Data)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         107,750
<SECURITIES>                                   361,930
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,336
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               572,181
<PP&E>                                       1,586,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                 299,164
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,160,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          260,883
<BONDS>                                      1,108,873
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,735
<OTHER-SE>                                     923,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,160,157
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,664
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,627
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,255
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,049
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (50,816)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       516
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (51,332)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (51,332)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)
        

</TABLE>