Facility _Information facility _id utility

_code legal_owner_nam e

legl_operator_name

legal_address_ty pe

legal_address

legal_city legal_state legal_zip 1047 9417 Interstate Power and Light Interstate Power and Light

legal owner200 First Street SE Cedar Rapids

IA 52401

Page 1Facility _Information plant_nam e

physical_address

phyical_city

physical_state

physical_zip

ma iling_address

ma iling_city

ma iling_state

ma iling_zip Lansing 2320 Power Plant Drive Lansing IA 52151-9733 2320 Power Plant Drive

Lansing IA 52151-9733

Page 2Facility _Information RFA_small_entity

ff_fired_coal

ff_fired_oil ff_fired_ngas ff_fired_petcoke

ff_fired_other

ff_permitted_coal

ff_permitted_oil

ff_permitted_ngas No TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE FALSE

Page 3Facility _Information ff_permitted_petcoke

ff_permitted_other

deviation_reporting

continuous_emissions

cem_provided

facility _note FALSE TRUE Excess Emission Report, Quarterly Report, Semi-annual monitoring report, Annual Compliance certification. Yes Facility : LansingThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 4Facility _Information Facility : LansingThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 5Facility _Information Facility : LansingThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 6Facility _Information Facility : LansingThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 7Facility _Information Facility : LansingThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 8Facility _Information Facility : LansingThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 9Facility _Information Facility : LansingThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 10Facility _Information Facility : LansingThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 11Facility _Information Facility : LansingThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 12Facility _Information Facility : LansingThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 13Facility _Information Facility : LansingThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 14facility _contacts facility _id contact_id contact_title contact_name

contact_phone1

contact_phone2

contact_email

contact_primary 1047 1 Manager Environmental Services Bradley G. Picombe 6084584928 bradley pincombe@alliantenergy .com TRUE 1047 2 Environm ental Specialist Orvella Shipm an

6417913203 orvellashipm an@alliantenergy .com FALSE

Page 15facility _coal_utilized facility _id coal_ty pe percentage_mass percentage_btu

sy nfuel_ty pe

coal_note 1047 subbituminous 100 100

Page 16facility _oil_utilized facility _id oil_ty pe percentage_volume percentage_btu

other_ty pe 1047 No.2 Fuel Oil (distillate) 100 100

Page 17facility _other_materials facility _id other_material

permitted_burn

actually _burn other_quantity

other_quantity

_units other_note rcra_utilize rcra_explain 1047 Boiler Cleaning W aste

TRUE FALSE 300000 Permitted to burn up to 300,000 Gallons every 7 years No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1047 Ion exchange resin

TRUE FALSE 100 Permitted to burn 100 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1047 Oil/W ater separator sludge

TRUE FALSE 1000 Permitted to burn 1000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1047 Oily

W ater TRUE FALSE 100000 Permitted to burn 10,000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1047 Turbine cleaning waste

TRUE FALSE 8000 Permitted to burn up to 8000 Gallons every 7 years No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1047 Used Oil TRUE FALSE 6000 Permitted to burn 6000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1047 Used Oil adsorbents

TRUE FALSE 1000 Permitted to burn 1000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1047 Wa ter based parts washer

TRUE FALSE 10000 Permitted to burn 10,000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive.

Page 18facility _other_materials rcra_explain CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive.

Page 19boiler_information

facility _id boiler_id boiler_ty pe boiler_other bottom_design

design_fuel heat_input ma x_heat_input MW e_capacity 1047 3 Wa ll firing - front firing Dry Bottom coal 388.6 452.9 31.9 1047 4 Other (specify) Turbo-Fired

Dry Bottom coal 2603 2626 264.2

Page 20boiler_information

MW e_net_capacity

design_gross_efficiency

operating_gross_efficiency

design_pressure

operating_pressure

design_temp

operating_temp

design_reheat_multiple

design_reheat_temp1 29.4 87.34 79 875 850 1.01 1.02 FALSE 1.03 250.9 85.36 85.5 2520 2415 1.05 1.06 FALSE 1.07

Page 21boiler_information

design_reheat_temp2

operating_reheat_multiple

operating_reheat_temp1

operating_reheat_temp2

hours_operated

vg_capacity

_factor applicable_NSPS

retirement_year

retirement_year_CBI FALSE 1.04 5375 40.09 N FALSE FALSE 1.08 7414 68.29 Subpart D FALSE

Page 22boiler_information

NOx_control

SO2_control

combustion_additives No Yes No No Yes No

Page 23boiler_fuels

facility _id boiler_id fuel_ty pe fuel_year percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_ty pe 1047 3 coal - subbituminous 2007 99.52 1047 3 coal - subbituminous 2008 99.53 1047 3 coal - subbituminous 2009 99.7 1047 3 oil - distillate 2007 0.48 1047 3 oil - distillate 2008 0.47 1047 3 oil - distillate 2009 0.3 1047 4 coal - subbituminous 2007 99.86 1047 4 coal - subbituminous 2008 99.94 1047 4 coal - subbituminous 2009 99.79 1047 4 oil - distillate 2007 0.14 1047 4 oil - distillate 2008 0.06 1047 4 oil - distillate 2009 0.21

Page 24boiler_control_NOx

facility _id boiler_id NOx_ty pe NOx_other NOx_online

Page 25boiler_control_SO2

facility _id boiler_id SO2_ty pe SO2_other SO2_online 1047 3 Low Sulfur Coal 5/1/1999 1047 4 Low Sulfur Coal 4/1/1977

Page 26boiler_additives

facility _id boiler_id boiler_additive additive_other

additive_online

Page 27facility _units facility _id unit_id 1047 3 1047 4

Page 28unit_boilers

facility _id unit_id boiler_id 1047 3 3 1047 4 4

Page 29facility _controls facility _id control_id control_group control_ty pe

control_other

legacy _control cntrol_online

control_offline

NOx_reagent 1047 ESP-3 PM control Electrostatic precipitator, cold side, w/o flue gas conditioning FALSE 6/1/1975 1047 ESP-4 PM control Electrostatic precipitator, hot side, w/o flue gas conditioning FALSE 4/1/1977

Page 30facility _controls reagent_other

NOx_ammonia

SO2_sorbent

oher_sorbent

SO2_scrubber_additive

Page 31facility _sampling_ports facility _id sampling_port_id 1047 ESP Inlet-4 1047 Stack-3 1047 Stack-4

Page 32facility _stacks facility _id stack_id stack_height stack_diameter

sack_gas_velocity 1047 Unit 3 Stack 158 5.645 1047 Unit 4 Stack 499 15.4

Page 33configurations

facility _id configuration_id 1047 Unit 3 1047 Unit 4

Page 34configuration_components

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

order component_ty pe port_near 1047 Unit 3 3 1 Unit 1047 Unit 3 ESP-3 2 PM control 1047 Unit 3 Stack-3 3 Sam pling Port next 1047 Unit 3 Unit 3 Stack 4 Stack 1047 Unit 4 4 1 Unit 1047 Unit 4 ESP Inlet-4 2 Sam pling Port next 1047 Unit 4 ESP-4 3 PM control 1047 Unit 4 Stack-4 4 Sam pling Port next 1047 Unit 4 Unit 4 Stack 5 Stack

Page 35configuration_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

pollutant_nam e

permit_ty pe_1

em lim it_1 em lim it_units_1 avg_period_1

em lim it_2 em lim it_units_2 1047 Unit 3 PM (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

0.6 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 0.37 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1047 Unit 3 PM10 (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

60 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1047 Unit 3 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

410 pound per hour (lb/hr)

3 hours 5 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1047 Unit 4 PM (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

0.03 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1047 Unit 4 PM10 (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

260 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1047 Unit 4 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

3127 pound per hour (lb/hr)

3 hours 1.2 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1047 Unit 4 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) State - State Operating Permit

0.7 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

3 hours

Page 36configuration_pollutants1

avg_period_2

em lim it_details

test_method

em rate em rate_units guarantee_level

_explain

req_monitoring

eq_recordkeeping pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) Lim its 1 & 2 are on a 3 run average. This is Total PM = PM (Filterable) + PM (Condensible)Limit 1 only boiler 3 in operationLim it 2 includes boilers 1,2 and 3 in operation No CAM Plan. The date and time that this emissions unit (EU LB3) was in operation;the date and time that a TR set on this unit’s ESP was taken off line for repair or was off line; the date and time that this emissions unit was in operation and a TR set was taken off line for repair or was off line and a diesel IC engine (EU LD1 or EU LD2) was in operation; and the date and time that this unit was in operation and one of the boilers that vents through boiler stack 1 (EU LB1 or EU LB2) was in operation. CAM Plan. The date and time that this emissions unit (EU LB3) was in operation;the date and time that a TR set on this unit’s ESP was taken off line for repair or was off line; the date and time that this emissions unit was in operation and a TR set was taken off line for repair or was off line and a diesel IC engine (EU LD1 or EU LD2) was in operation; and the date and time that this unit was in operation and one of the boilers that vents through boiler stack 1 (EU LB1 or EU LB2) was in operation. Lim it 1 is on a 3 run average. No The date and time that this emissions unit (EU LB3) was in operation;the date and time that a TR set on this unit’s ESP was taken off line for repair or was off line; the date and time that this emissions unit was in operation and a TR set was taken off line for repair or was off line and a diesel IC engine (EU LD1 or EU LD2) was in operation; and the date and time that this unit was in operation and one of the boilers that vents through boiler stack 1 (EU LB1 or EU LB2) was in operation. Stack test every 2.5 years. The date and time that this emissions unit (EU LB3) was in operation;the date and time that a TR set on this unit’s ESP was taken off line for repair or was off line; the date and time that this emissions unit was in operation and a TR set was taken off line for repair or was off line and a diesel IC engine (EU LD1 or EU LD2) was in operation; and the date and time that this unit was in operation and one of the boilers that vents through boiler stack 1 (EU LB1 or EU LB2) was in operation. pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) No CEM, 40 CFR Part 75. Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity , Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Dioxide, and airflow. The monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the facility’s Title V Operating Permit, 40 CFR Part 75, and 40 CFR Part 60 CEM, 40 CFR Part 75 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) Front half. Limit 1 is on a 3 run average. This PM is Total PM = PM (Filterable) + PM (Condensible) No "CEM Plan. The facility shall record the number of hours per month the electrostatic precipitator is used to capture the flyash for beneficial reuse. The facility shall calculate and update the twelve-month rolling total hours of operation, for each month. The owner or operator shall determine the actual annual emissions for the project, in tons per year on a calendar-year basis. Actual annual emissions minus the baseline actual emissions from the project shall not exceed the PSD significant levels of 24.4 tons per calendar year of PM, 14.4 tons per calendar year of PM10, 39.4 tons per calendar year of SO2, 39.4 tons per calendar year of VOC, 39.4 tons per calendar year of NOx and 0.6 tons per calendar year of lead. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a rep "CEM Plan. The facility shall record the number of hours per month the electrostatic precipitator is used to capture the flyash for beneficial reuse. The facility shall calculate and update the twelve-month rolling total hours of operation, for each month. c. The owner or operator shall determine the actual annual emissions for the project, in tons per year on a calendar-year basis. Actual annual emissions minus the baseline actual emissions from the project shall not exceed the PSD significant levels of 24.4 tons per calendar year of PM, 14.4 tons per calendar year of PM10, 39.4 tons per calendar year of SO2, 39.4 tons per calendar year of VOC, 39.4 tons per calendar year of NOx and 0.6 tons per calendar year of lead. " Lim it 1 is on a 3 run average. No The facility shall record the number of hours per month the electrostatic precipitator is used to capture the flyash for beneficial reuse. The facility shall calculate and update the twelve-month rolling total hours of operation, for each month. The owner or operator shall determine the actual annual emissions for the project, in tons per year on a calendar-year basis. Actual annual emissions minus the baseline actual emissions from the project shall not exceed the PSD significant levels of 24.4 tons per calendar year of PM, 14.4 tons per calendar year of PM10, 39.4 tons per calendar year of SO2, 39.4 tons per calendar year of VOC, 39.4 tons per calendar year of NOx and 0.6 tons per calendar year of lead. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuan The facility

shall record the number of hours per month the electrostatic precipitator is used to capture the flyash for beneficial reuse. The facility shall calculate and update the twelve-month rolling total hours of operation, for each month. The owner or operator shall determine the actual annual emissions for the project, in tons per year on a calendar-year basis. Actual annual emissions minus the baseline actual emissions from the project shall not exceed the PSD significant levels of 24.4 tons per calendar year of PM, 14.4 tons per calendar year of PM10, 39.4 tons per calendar year of SO2, 39.4 tons per calendar year of VOC, 39.4 tons per calendar year of NOx and 0.6 tons per calendar year of lead. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuan 3 hours No CEM 40 CFR Part 75.Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity , Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Monoxide and airflow. The monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the facility’s Title V Operating Permit, 40 CFR Part 75, and 40 CFR Part 60 "CEM 40 CFR Part 75. Record the date Boiler #4 starts operation after the physical modifications. Record annually the sum of the actual PM, PM10, VOC, NOx, lead and SO2 emissions from Boiler #4 in tons per year on a calendar-year basis. Record annually the ton per year value of the actual emissions minus the baseline actual emissions for PM, PM10, VOC, NOx, lead and SO2." No Guarantee information in CBI submittal CEM 40 CFR Part 75. Continuous emission monitoring is required for Opacity , Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Monoxide and airflow. The monitoring shall be maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the facility’s Title V Operating Permit, 40 CFR Part 75, and 40 CFR Part 60

"CEM 40 CFR Part 75. Record the date Boiler #4 starts operation after the physical modifications. Record annually the sum of the actual PM, PM10, VOC, NOx, lead and SO2 emissions from Boiler #4 in tons per year on a calendar-year basis. Record annually the ton per year value of the actual emissions minus the baseline actual emissions for PM, PM10, VOC, NOx, lead and SO2."

Page 37configuration_pollutants1

req_reporting CAM Plan. n/a "The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit semi-annual excess emission report on any exceedances of the hourly SO2 emission limit. The SO2 limit is based on the rolling average of three contiguous one-hour periods as measured by a continuous emissions monitoring system." "CEM Plan. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7)." "If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7)." The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7). The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7).

Page 38configuration_pollutants1

"The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit semi-annual excess emission report on any exceedances of the hourly SO2 emission limit. The SO2 limit is based on the rolling average of three contiguous one-hour periods as measured by a continuous emissions monitoring system." "CEM Plan. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7)." "If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7)." The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7). The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7).

Page 39configuration_pollutants1

"The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit semi-annual excess emission report on any exceedances of the hourly SO2 emission limit. The SO2 limit is based on the rolling average of three contiguous one-hour periods as measured by a continuous emissions monitoring system." "CEM Plan. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7)." "If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7)." The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7). The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7).

Page 40configuration_pollutants1

"The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit semi-annual excess emission report on any exceedances of the hourly SO2 emission limit. The SO2 limit is based on the rolling average of three contiguous one-hour periods as measured by a continuous emissions monitoring system." "CEM Plan. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7)." "If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7)." The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7). The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7).

Page 41configuration_pollutants1

"The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit semi-annual excess emission report on any exceedances of the hourly SO2 emission limit. The SO2 limit is based on the rolling average of three contiguous one-hour periods as measured by a continuous emissions monitoring system." The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7). The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7).

Page 42configuration_pollutants1

"The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit semi-annual excess emission report on any exceedances of the hourly SO2 emission limit. The SO2 limit is based on the rolling average of three contiguous one-hour periods as measured by a continuous emissions monitoring system." The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7). The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7).

Page 43configuration_pollutants1

"The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit semi-annual excess emission report on any exceedances of the hourly SO2 emission limit. The SO2 limit is based on the rolling average of three contiguous one-hour periods as measured by a continuous emissions monitoring system." The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7). The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. If the emission increases from Project 09-405 do not exceed the PSD significance levels, these limits shall no longer apply 5 years after the date of start of operation (start-up date). If these limits are exceeded prior to expiration of the 5 year period, the owner or operator shall submit a report pursuant to 567 IAC 33.3(18)”f”(7).

Page 44control_technologies

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id project_title project_ty pe vendor_name

vndor_contact

vendor_phone 1047 Unit 4 4 1 Baghouse / ACI System Non-Demonstration

HamonHamon

Barry Stolzm an 9083332020

Page 45control_technologies

vendor_address

vndor_city

vendor_state

vendor_zip actual_start_date projected_start_date

end_date sorbent chemical_additive 58 East Main Street

Som erville NJ 08876 6/1/2010 Powdered Activated Carbon

Page 46control_technologies

injection_point

HAP_em ission_reduction

HAP_em ission_rate

HAP_em ission_rate_units

HAP_achieved_reduction

HAP_achieved_rate

HAP_achieved_rate_units

feed_rate feed_rate_units Downstream of Air Heater

1.25

Page 47control_technologies feed_rate_units

Page 48control_coal_ranks

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id coal_ty pe 1047 Unit 4 4 1 subbituminous

Page 49control_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id pollutant_nam e 1047 Unit 4 4 1 Total Mercury (Hgt)

Page 50control_costs

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id boiler_retrofit boiler_new_install

total_capital_investm ent

total_operating_costs

base_year 1047 Unit 4 4 1 Yes No

Page 51control_costs

CBI TRUE

Page 52mi sc_controls

facility _id mi sc_control_id

control_description

Page 53mi sc_control_configurations

facility _id mi sc_control_id

configuration_id

Page 54fuel_shipments

facility _id shipment_id

shipment_date

am ount_received

am ount_units

fuel_ty pe state_country other_country

county 1047 200902-Oil 2/1/2009 961.5 barrels oil 1047 200904-Coal 4/1/2009 78589.13 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1047 200904-Oil 4/1/2009 2890.8 barrels oil 1047 200905-BiCoal-3

5/1/2009 7093 short tons (2000 lbs) coal IN 1047 200905-Coal 5/1/2009 73488 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1047 200906-BiCoal-3

6/1/2009 7935 short tons (2000 lbs) coal IN 1047 200906-Coal 6/1/2009 82044 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1047 200906-Oil 6/1/2009 2648.7 barrels oil 1047 200907-BiCoal-3

7/1/2009 11644 short tons (2000 lbs) coal IN 1047 200907-Coal 7/1/2009 89007 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1047 200908-BiCoal-3

8/1/2009 19925 short tons (2000 lbs) coal IN 1047 200908-Coal 8/1/2009 74625 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1047 200909-Coal 9/1/2009 78018 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1047 200910-Coal

10/1/2009 67405.41 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1047 200910-Oil 10/1/2009 1919.5 barrels oil 1047 200911-Coal

11/1/2009 70889.35 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1047 200911-Oil 11/1/2009 242 barrels oil 1047 200912-Coal

12/1/2009 31890.64 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY

Page 55fuel_shipments

coal_seam shipment_method

Trucks Barge Trucks Barge Barge Barge Barge Trucks Barge Barge Barge Barge Barge Barge Trucks Barge Trucks Barge

Page 56fuel_shipment_configurations

facility _id shipment_id

configuration_id 1047 200902-Oil Unit 3 1047 200902-Oil Unit 4 1047 200904-Coal

Unit 3 1047 200904-Coal

Unit 4 1047 200904-Oil Unit 3 1047 200904-Oil Unit 4 1047 200905-BiCoal-3

Unit 3 1047 200905-Coal

Unit 3 1047 200905-Coal

Unit 4 1047 200906-BiCoal-3

Unit 3 1047 200906-Coal

Unit 3 1047 200906-Coal

Unit 4 1047 200906-Oil Unit 3 1047 200906-Oil Unit 4 1047 200907-BiCoal-3

Unit 3 1047 200907-Coal

Unit 3 1047 200907-Coal

Unit 4 1047 200908-BiCoal-3

Unit 3 1047 200908-Coal

Unit 3 1047 200908-Coal

Unit 4 1047 200909-Coal

Unit 3 1047 200909-Coal

Unit 4 1047 200910-Coal

Unit 3 1047 200910-Coal

Unit 4 1047 200910-Oil Unit 3 1047 200910-Oil Unit 4 1047 200911-Coal

Unit 3 1047 200911-Coal

Unit 4 1047 200911-Oil Unit 3 1047 200911-Oil Unit 4 1047 200912-Coal

Unit 3 1047 200912-Coal

Unit 4

Page 57fuel_shipment_samples

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id am ount_fuel am ount_fuel_units

total_sulfur ash_content heating_value

hating_units

Page 58fuel_shipment_samples

chlorine chlorine_units fluorine fluorine_units data_provided

data_other_specified

supplier_ty pe

supplier_name

supplier_address

Page 59fuel_shipment_samples

supplier_city

supplier_state

supplier_zip

lab_nam e lab_address lab_city lab_state lab_zip analysis_copies

Page 60fuel_shipment_samples analysis_copies

Page 61fuel_sample_pollutants

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id fuel_pollutant pollutant_conc

pollutant_conc_units

pollutant_conc_ND

pollutant_conc_MDL

Page 62test_reports

facility _id report_id report_ty pe other_ty pe report_description report_begin_date

report_end_date

before_control

during_deviation 1047 LANS3-CO-20070725

compliance Carbon Monoxide testing at unit 3 Stack 7/25/2007 7/25/2007 No No 1047 LANS3-Hg-20060504

compliance Mercury testing at unit 3 Stack 5/4/2006 5/4/2006 No No 1047 LANS3-PM-20060427

compliance Particulate testing at unit 3 Stack 4/27/2006 4/27/2006 No No 1047 LANS3-PM-20080618

compliance Particulate testing at unit 3 Stack 6/18/2008 6/18/2008 No No 1047 LANS4-CO-20070726

other Diagnostic Carbon Monoxide testing at unit 4 Stack 7/26/2007 7/26/2007 No No 1047 LANS4-H2SO4-20071211

other Diagnostic Sulfuric acid mist diagnostic testing for unit 4 Stack to develop baseline for SCR permit application analysis ######## ######## No No 1047 LANS4-Hg-20071002

other Diagnostic Mercury testing at unit 4 Stack 10/2/2007 10/2/2007 No No 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

other Diagnostic Metals testing at unit 4 ESP Inlet duct 5/2/2006 5/2/2006 No No 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

compliance Metals testing at unit 4 Stack 5/2/2006 5/2/2006 No No 1047 LANS4-PM-20060502

compliance Particulate testing at unit 4 Stack 5/2/2006 5/2/2006 No No

Page 63test_reports

deviation_reports No No No No No No No No No No

Page 64test_report_configurations

facility _id report_id configuration_id 1047 LANS3-CO-20070725

Unit 3 1047 LANS3-Hg-20060504

Unit 3 1047 LANS3-PM-20060427

Unit 3 1047 LANS3-PM-20080618

Unit 3 1047 LANS4-CO-20070726

Unit 4 1047 LANS4-H2SO4-20071211

Unit 4 1047 LANS4-Hg-20071002

Unit 4 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

Unit 4 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Unit 4 1047 LANS4-PM-20060502

Unit 4

Page 65test_report_fuels

facility _id report_id fuel_id 1047 LANS3-CO-20070725

Bitum inous 1047 LANS3-Hg-20060504

Bitum inous 1047 LANS3-PM-20060427

Bitum inous 1047 LANS3-PM-20080618

Bitum inous 1047 LANS4-CO-20070726

Subbitum inous 1047 LANS4-H2SO4-20071211

Subbitum inous 1047 LANS4-Hg-20071002

Subbitum inous 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

Subbitum inous 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Subbitum inous 1047 LANS4-PM-20060502

Subbitum inous

Page 66test_report_fuel_ty pes

facility _id report_id fuel_id fuel_ty pe percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_ty pe 1047 LANS3-CO-20070725

Bitum inous coal - bituminous 100 100 1047 LANS3-Hg-20060504

Bitum inous coal - bituminous 100 100 1047 LANS3-PM-20060427

Bitum inous coal - bituminous 100 100 1047 LANS3-PM-20080618

Bitum inous coal - bituminous 100 100 1047 LANS4-CO-20070726

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1047 LANS4-H2SO4-20071211

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1047 LANS4-Hg-20071002

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1047 LANS4-PM-20060502

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100

Page 67cem_data

facility _id tim e_period

cem_period_description 1047 01/01/2009 - 12/31/2009

Start date of time period for which Hg CEMs data is available reflects post-installation and QA/QC of the Tekran continuous mercury emission monitor systems for Lansing Unit 4. See NOTES page for additional information.

Page 68cem_data Start date of time period for which Hg CEMs data is available reflects post-installation and QA/QC of the Tekran continuous mercury emission monitor systems for Lansing Unit 4. See NOTES page for additional information.

Page 69cem_data Start date of time period for which Hg CEMs data is available reflects post-installation and QA/QC of the Tekran continuous mercury emission monitor systems for Lansing Unit 4. See NOTES page for additional information.

Page 70cem_data_pollutants1

facility _id tim e_period

pollutant_nam e 1047 01/01/2009 - 12/31/2009

Total Mercury

(Hgt)

Page 71test_report_sampling

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id point_differ point_description befre_SO2_device

point_orientation

normal_by pass_percent

testing_by pass_percent 1047 LANS3-CO-20070725

Stack-3 No No 1047 LANS3-Hg-20060504

Stack-3 No No 1047 LANS3-PM-20060427

Stack-3 No No 1047 LANS3-PM-20080618

Stack-3 No No 1047 LANS4-CO-20070726

Stack-4 No No 1047 LANS4-H2SO4-20071211

Stack-4 No No 1047 LANS4-Hg-20071002

Stack-4 No No 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

ESP Inlet-4 No No 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Stack-4 No No 1047 LANS4-PM-20060502

Stack-4 No No

Page 72test_report_sampling

fg_fraction

Page 73sampling_runs

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id start_datetime end_datetim e

unit_load net_generation fg_moisture_content 1047 LANS3-CO-20070725

Stack-3 average 7/25/2007 7/25/2007 1.14 8.7 1047 LANS3-Hg-20060504

Stack-3 average 5/4/2006 5/4/2006 1.09 7.7 1047 LANS3-PM-20060427

Stack-3 average 4/27/2006 4/27/2006 1.12 4.2 1047 LANS3-PM-20080618

Stack-3 average 6/18/2008 6/18/2008 1.16 4.8 1047 LANS4-CO-20070726

Stack-4 average 7/26/2007 7/26/2007 255 8.4 1047 LANS4-H2SO4-20071211

Stack-4 average ######## ######## 237 11.4 1047 LANS4-Hg-20071002

Stack-4 average 10/2/2007 10/2/2007 235 11.6 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

ESP Inlet-4 average 5/2/2006 5/2/2006 255 13.3 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Stack-4 average 5/2/2006 5/2/2006 255 11.2 1047 LANS4-PM-20060502

Stack-4 average 5/2/2006 5/2/2006 255 12

Page 74sampling_runs

fg_flow_rate

fg_flow_rate_units

standard_temperature

standard_pressure

normal_temperature

normal_pressure

fg_oxygen_content

fg_CO2_content

fg_temperature 124125 dscfm 68 1 7.9 11.4 1.15 108506 dscfm 68 1 9 11 1.11 110357 dscfm 68 1 9 11 1.13 119031 dscfm 68 1 7.8 11.3 1.17 639893 dscfm 68 1 5.1 14.2 1.19 572658 dscfm 68 1 6 13 298 571955 dscfm 68 1 6 13.5 1.24 508983 dscfm 68 1 6 13.5 1.22 651913 dscfm 68 1 6 13.5 1.21 658142 dscfm 68 1 6 13.5 1.23

Page 75sampling_runs

fg_pressure

Hg_loi test_method run_comments

fuel_id fuel_unit_load fuel_flow_rate

fuel_ash fuel_heating_value 0.98 10 0.98 ASTM D6784-02 Bitum inous 10 7.49 13169 0.98 201A/202 Bitum inous 12 7.9 13193 1 OTM027/202 Bitum inous 16 10.28 12943 0.97 10 0.95 8A (See note #1.18) Subbitum inous 237 6.87 11934 0.97 ASTM D6784-02 Subbitum inous 235 6.97 11874 0.94 29 Subbitum inous 255 6.9 11867 0.99 29 Subbitum inous 255 6.9 11867 0.99 201A/202 Subbitum inous 255 6.9 11867

Page 76sampling_runs

fuel_sulfur 0.65 0.65 0.5 0.43 0.35 0.5 0.5 0.5

Page 77sampling_run_pollutants1

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id pollutant_nam e conc conc_units conc_ND conc_MDL 1047 LANS4-Hg-20071002

Stack-4 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 6.555 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1047 LANS4-Hg-20071002

Stack-4 average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 6.046 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1047 LANS4-Hg-20071002

Stack-4 average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 0.505 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1047 LANS4-Hg-20071002

Stack-4 average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.005 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1047 LANS3-Hg-20060504

Stack-3 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 0.837 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1047 LANS3-Hg-20060504

Stack-3 average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 0.354 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1047 LANS3-Hg-20060504

Stack-3 average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 0.205 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1047 LANS3-Hg-20060504

Stack-3 average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.278 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1047 LANS3-PM-20060427

Stack-3 average PM (Filterable) 0.0598 FALSE 1047 LANS3-PM-20060427

Stack-3 average PM (Condensable) 0.0138 FALSE 1047 LANS3-PM-20060427

Stack-3 average PM10 (Filterable) 0.0159 FALSE 1047 LANS3-CO-20070725

Stack-3 average Carbon Monoxide (CO) 12.8 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1047 LANS3-PM-20080618

Stack-3 average PM (Filterable) 0.1075 FALSE 1047 LANS3-PM-20080618

Stack-3 average PM (Condensable) 0.0111 FALSE 1047 LANS3-PM-20080618

Stack-3 average PM10 (Filterable) 0.0169 FALSE 1047 LANS3-PM-20080618

Stack-3 average PM2.5 (Filterable) 0.0066 FALSE 1047 LANS4-CO-20070726

Stack-4 average Carbon Monoxide (CO) 21.9 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Stack-4 average Arsenic (As) 5.343 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Stack-4 average Beryllium (Be) 0.259 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Stack-4 average Cadmium (Cd) 0.13 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Stack-4 average Chromium (Cr) 1.646 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Stack-4 average Lead (Pb) 1.301 mi lligram per normal cubic meter (mg/Nm3) FALSE 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Stack-4 average Manganese (Mn) 9.723 mi lligram per normal cubic meter (mg/Nm3)

FALSE 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Stack-4 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 13.155 mi lligram per normal cubic meter (mg/Nm3)

FALSE 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Stack-4 average Nickel (Ni) 6.212 mi lligram per cubic meter (mg/m3) FALSE 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Stack-4 average Selenium (Se) 35.885 mi lligram per normal cubic meter (mg/Nm3) FALSE 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

ESP Inlet-4 average Arsenic (As) 384.105 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

ESP Inlet-4 average Beryllium (Be) 50.523 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

ESP Inlet-4 average Cadmium (Cd) 16.113 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

ESP Inlet-4 average Chromium (Cr) 428.454 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

ESP Inlet-4 average Lead (Pb) 243.597 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

ESP Inlet-4 average Manganese (Mn) 2113.98 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

ESP Inlet-4 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 19.08 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

ESP Inlet-4 average Nickel (Ni) 953.31 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

ESP Inlet-4 average Selenium (Se) 529.383 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1047 LANS4-PM-20060502

Stack-4 average PM (Filterable) 0.016 FALSE 1047 LANS4-PM-20060502

Stack-4 average PM (Condensable) 0.016 FALSE 1047 LANS4-PM-20060502

Stack-4 average PM10 (Filterable) 0.0113 FALSE

Page 78sampling_run_pollutants1

em ission_rate

em ission_rate_units

em ission_rate_ND

em ission_rate_MDL

em ission_factor

em ission_factor_units

em ission_factor_ND

em ission_factor_MDL

run_pollutant_comment 0.014 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 5.524 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE 0.0129 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 5.095 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE 0.00108 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.425 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE 1.03E-05 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 0.0041 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE 0.000317 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 8.37E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000134 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 3.38E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 7.76E-05 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 2.05E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000105 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 2.78E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 56.818 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.1461 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0598 grains/dscf) 13.014 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0337 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0138 grains/dscf) 15.048 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0387 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0159 grains/dscf) 7 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.015 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 109.606 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.242 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.1075 grains/dscf) 11.344 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0251 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0111 grains/dscf) 17.267 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0381 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0169 grains/dscf) 6.758 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0149 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0066 grains/dscf) 61 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.021 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.01303 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 4.57E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00063 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 2.22E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00032 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.11E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00401 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.41E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00318 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.11E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.02376 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 8.33E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.03214 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.13E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.01516 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 5.32E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.08756 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 3.07E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.731 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000329 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.096 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 4.33E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.031 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.38E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.815 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000367 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.463 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000209 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 4.019 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.00181 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.036 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.63E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 1.815 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000816 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 1.011 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000452 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 90.14 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0313 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.016 grains/dscf) 90.443 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0315 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.016 grains/dscf) 63.957 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0222 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0113 grains/dscf)

Page 79sampling_run_pollutants1 run_pollutant_comment

Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0598 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0138 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0159 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.1075 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0111 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0169 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0066 grains/dscf)

Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.016 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.016 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0113 grains/dscf)

Page 80sampling_run_fuel

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id fuel_pollutant fuel_conc fuel_conc_units fuel_conc_ND

fuel_conc_MDL 1047 LANS4-Hg-20071002

Stack-4 average Mercury (Hg) 0.06 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

ESP Inlet-4 average Arsenic (As) 7 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

ESP Inlet-4 average Chromium (Cr) 9 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

ESP Inlet-4 average Lead (Pb) 5 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

ESP Inlet-4 average Manganese (Mn) 19 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1047 LANS4-Inlet-Metals-20060502

ESP Inlet-4 average Mercury (Hg) 0.12 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Stack-4 average Arsenic (As) 7 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Stack-4 average Chromium (Cr) 9 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Stack-4 average Lead (Pb) 5 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Stack-4 average Manganese (Mn) 19 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1047 LANS4-Metals-20060502

Stack-4 average Mercury (Hg) 0.12 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE

Page 81sampling_run_fuel fuel_conc_MDL

Page 82