alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,264,628
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,524,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                   312,048
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,016,360
<PP&E>                                     244,754,859
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             735,730,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       38,247,535
<BONDS>                                    677,830,078
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,132,121
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               735,730,364
<SALES>                                     48,044,199
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,044,199
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,662,370
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          16,428,447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (15,996,162)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (15,996,162)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (15,996,162)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 77665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31506]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-030-01-1220-PA: GP1-0051]


Notice of Meeting of the Oregon Trail Interpretive Center 
Advisory Board

AGENCY: National Historic Oregon Trail Interpretive Center, Vale 
District, Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is given that a meeting of the Advisory Board for the 
National Historic Oregon Trail Interpretive Center will be held on 
Tuesday, January 9, 2001 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. in the Conference Room 
at the Baker County Library, 2400 Resort Street, Baker City, Oregon. 
Public comments will be received from 11 a.m. to 11:15 a.m., January 9, 
2001. Topics to be discussed are the review and approval of the updated 
Strategic Plan, reports from Coordinators of Subcommittees, and the 
development of Action Plan and Recommendations for FY2001-2002.

DATES: The meeting will begin at 8 a.m. and run to 12 p.m. January 9, 
2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David B. Hunsaker, Bureau of Land 
Management, National Historic Oregon Trail, Interpretive Center, P.O. 
Box 987, Baker City, OR 97814, (Telephone 541-523-1845).

Sandra L. Guches,
Acting Vale District Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-31506 Filed 12-11-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
II 

Calendar No. 145 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 213 

[Report No. 115–108] 

To designate the wilderness within the Lake Clark National Park and 

Preserve in the State of Alaska as the Jay S. Hammond Wilderness Area. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2017 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself and Mr. SULLIVAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

JUNE 14, 2017 

Reported by Ms. MURKOWSKI, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the wilderness within the Lake Clark National 

Park and Preserve in the State of Alaska as the Jay 

S. Hammond Wilderness Area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jay S. Hammond Wil5 derness Act of 2017’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 213 RS

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF JAY S. HAMMOND WILDERNESS 

2 AREA. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The approximately 2,600,000 

4 acres of National Wilderness Preservation System land lo5 cated within the Lake Clark National Park and Preserve 

6 designated by section 201(e)(7)(a) of the Alaska National 

7 Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 

8 410hh(e)(7)(a)) shall be known and designated as the 

9 ‘‘Jay S. Hammond Wilderness Area’’. 

10 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg11 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

12 States to the wilderness area referred to in subsection (a) 

13 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jay S. Ham14 mond Wilderness Area’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 145 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 213 

[Report No. 115–108] 

A BILL 

To designate the wilderness within the Lake Clark 

ka as the Jay S. Hammond Wilderness Area. National Park and Preserve in the State of AlasJUNE 14, 2017 

Reported without amendment 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0424 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM004AD

777 -32 -0080 IN 04 --- 12/22/10 777 -32 -0080 IN 03 --- 10/29/09 777 -32 -0080 IN 02 --- 10/8/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Fe deral Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### W. M. CHOWNING v. STATE.

No. 20056.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 21, 1938.

Rehearing Denied May 3, 1939.

J. C. Darroch and E. M. Davis, both of Brownwood, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for. the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Passing a forged instrument is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The evidence presented and the legal questions raised in the instant case are identically the same as those which are before the court in the companion case of Chowning v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 127 S.W.2d 461, in which an opinion affirming the judgment of conviction is this day rendered. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment in the present appeal is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

GRAVES, Judge.

This is a companion case to 127 S.W.2d 461, against the same appellant, the facts being similar, and the contentions in the motion herein raising the same question relative to the passing of a similar check signed in the same manner. In accordance with the opinion this day handed down in the above companion case, we are constrained to hold that there is no merit in this motion.

The motion is accordingly overruled.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1










                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
pertaining to the Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan (Form S-8 Nos.
33-66552, 33-86062 and 333-13061) and the Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan and
the Stock Option Plan for Employees (Form S-8 No. 33-52664) of American Dental
Technologies, Inc. of our report dated February 25, 2000 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of American Dental Technologies,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1999.



                                                  Ernst & Young LLP
                                                  Detroit, Michigan

March 30, 1999
Exhibit 24.3








Power of Attorney


(RadiSys Form 10-K)





The undersigned constitutes and appoints SCOTT GROUT and BRIAN BRONSON, and each of them, as the undersigned's true and lawful attorneys and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for the undersigned and in the undersigned's name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the RadiSys Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do any and all acts and things necessary or advisable to be done, as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys and agents or either of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney, in the capacity indicated, as of the date set forth below.





Dated:  March 1, 2011








/s/ DR. WILLIAM W. LATTINSignatureDr. William W. LattinType or Print Name
<PAGE>


                    D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
September 30, 2002 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G.
William Ruhl, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. [ss] 1350, as adopted pursuant to [ss] 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that based on my knowledge:


     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. [ss] 78m(a) or [ss]
78o(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




   /s/ G. William Ruhl
-----------------------------
Name:  G. William Ruhl
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  November 20, 2002
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50366

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RUBEN MUNOZ-FELIX 

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-2227-ALL

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ruben Munoz-Felix raises

arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.

224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FURR'S/BISHOP'S, INCORPORATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,516
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      911
<ALLOWANCES>                                        29
<INVENTORY>                                      6,038
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,558
<PP&E>                                         102,513
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,729
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,250
<BONDS>                                         66,205
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           487
<OTHER-SE>                                    (40,585)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,801
<SALES>                                        193,530
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               193,530
<CGS>                                           58,292
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,292
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               140,345
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 289
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,396)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,396)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,396)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the audited
Balance Sheet of Telecommunications Income Fund IX, L.P. as of December 31,
1996, and the audited Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 1996,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         497,144
<SECURITIES>                                    60,310
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,575,298
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (244,814)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,782,489
<DEPRECIATION>                                (28,248)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,642,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,905,639
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,184,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,642,179
<SALES>                                      3,289,142
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,289,142
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,210,794
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               577,931
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             492,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,008,207
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,008,207
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,008,207
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    14.83<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    14.83
<FN>
<F1>Net income per Partnership Unit
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### TOLIVER v. STATE.

No. 19950.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 12, 1938.

John M. Mathis, Jr., of San Antonio, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of five years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

The judgment is affirmed.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Ronald MJ 

Gregg, Respondent. 

Appellate Case No. 2022-001710 

Appeal from Charleston County 

Deadra L. Jefferson, Circuit Court Judge 

Memorandum Opinion No. 2024-MO-014 

Heard May 22, 2024 – Filed June 5, 2024 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED 

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior 

Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, 

both of Columbia, for Petitioner. 

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for 

Respondent. 

PER CURIAM We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' 

decision in In re Care & Treatment of Gregg, Op. No. 2022-UP-336 (S.C. Ct. App. 

filed Aug. 10, 2022). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, FEW, JAMES and HILL, JJ., concur.
Siloxanes ECA Extension

Marcus Aguilar to:

pdeleo, james.blum, Betsy.Carlton, emihaich, 

kathy.plotzke, russell.mait, wendykoch, 

lisa.dumars, Raymond.Hiley, Kevin.West, 

12/20/2012 02:20 PM

Cc: Ward Penberthy, Mike Mattheisen, Paul Lewis

From: Marcus Aguilar/DC/USEPA/US

To: pdeleo@cleaninginstitute.org, james.blum@bluestarsilicones.com, 

Betsy.Carlton@bluestarsilicones.com, emihaich@nc.rr.com, kathy.plotzke@dowcorning.com, 

russell.mait@evonik.com, wendykoch@eponallc.com, lisa.dumars@momentive.com, 

Cc: Ward Penberthy/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Mike Mattheisen/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paul 

Lewis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Dear Siloxanes ECA Participants,

This email is intended to notify interested parties that EPA has extended the ECA negotiation period by 60 

days until February 27, 2013 at the request of the Silicones Environmental Health and Safety Council 

(SEHSC). In its request to EPA, SEHSC stated that the extension would allow them to add additional 

POTWs to their current siloxane monitoring proposal. The precise timing of future negotiation sessions 

will be determined in early January. EPA remains hopeful that an ECA agreeable to all interested parties 

can be concluded in the near term.

Please see the attached letter from SEHSC requesting an extension of this ECA. This letter will be placed 

in the public docket for this ECA. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me via email or telephone. I will be out of the office 

beginning Dec. 21 and returning Jan. 2. 

06 Dec 12 Response Response Letter Final.pd Final.pdf

Sincerely,

Marcus Aguilar

Telephone: (202) 564-3194

Facsimile: (202) 564-4765

Program Analyst

Chemical Information and Testing Branch

Chemical Control Division

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

US Environmental Protection Agency
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2272 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2272

  To amend the Revised Statutes to grant State attorneys general the 
ability to issue subpoenas to investigate suspected violations of State 
              laws that are applicable to national banks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 21, 2017

     Ms. Harris (for herself, Ms. Warren, Mr. Blumenthal, and Mrs. 
  Feinstein) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Revised Statutes to grant State attorneys general the 
ability to issue subpoenas to investigate suspected violations of State 
              laws that are applicable to national banks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VISITORIAL POWERS.

    The sixth undesignated paragraph of section 5240 of the Revised 
Statutes (12 U.S.C. 484) is amended by striking subparagraph (B) and 
inserting the following:
            ``(B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A)--
                    ``(i) lawfully authorized State auditors and 
                examiners may, at reasonable times and upon reasonable 
                notice to a bank, review its records solely to ensure 
                compliance with applicable State unclaimed property or 
                escheat laws upon reasonable cause to believe that the 
                bank has failed to comply with such laws; and
                    ``(ii) an attorney general (or other chief law 
                enforcement officer) of a State may issue subpoenas or 
                administer oversight and examination to national banks 
                or officers of national banks based upon reasonable 
                cause to believe that the national bank or an officer 
                of a national bank has failed to comply with applicable 
                State laws.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**ERIC ARMS,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 529 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 17th day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**

**Justices Eakin and Donohue did not participate in the consi deration or decision** 

**of this matter.**