alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.1(c)  LIST OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS SUBJECT TO THE FORM OF EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERSAND CEPHALON, INC.  Name
  
  TitleValli
  F. Baldassano
  
  Exec.
  Vice President and Chief Compliance OfficerJ.
  Kevin Buchi
  
  Exec.
  Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerPeter
  E. Grebow, Ph.D.
  
  Exec.
  Vice President, Worldwide Technical OperationsJohn
  E. Osborn, Esq.
  
  Exec.
  Vice President, General Counsel & SecretaryRobert
  P. Roche, Jr.
  
  Exec.
  Vice President, Worldwide Pharmaceutical OperationsLesley
  Russell
  
  Exec.
  Vice President, Worldwide Medical & Regulatory OperationsCarl
  A. Savini
  
  Exec.
  Vice President and Chief Administrative OfficerJeffry
  L. Vaught, Ph.D.
  
  Exec.
  Vice President and President, Research & Development
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1577 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1577

  To amend the Foreign Trade Zones Act to clarify that crude oil and 
derivatives thereof consumed in refining operations are not subject to 
    duty under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 1993

 Mr. Ortiz (for himself and Mr. Abercrombie) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Foreign Trade Zones Act to clarify that crude oil and 
derivatives thereof consumed in refining operations are not subject to 
    duty under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FUEL NOT SUBJECT TO DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Section 3(d) of the Act of June 18, 1934 (commonly 
known as the Foreign Trade Zones Act (19 U.S.C. 81c(d)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``In regard'' and inserting ``(1) 
        Calculation of Relative Values.--In regard''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) Fuel Consumed in Refining Operations.--Notwithstanding any 
other provision of law, crude oil and derivatives thereof admitted into 
a foreign trade zone and consumed in the refining process are not 
subject to duty.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to articles admitted into a foreign trade zone after 
the date which is 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 134 

To amend the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program 

Act of 2000 to extend and increase the authority for the ombudsman 

under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. GALLEGLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education 

and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 to extend and increase 

the authority for the ombudsman under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘EEOICPA Ombuds5 man Extension and Enhancement Act of 2009’’. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 134 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASED AUTHORITY FOR OMBUDSMAN UNDER 

2 ENERGY EMPLOYEES OCCUPATIONAL ILL3 NESS COMPENSATION PROGRAM. 

4 Section 3686 of the Energy Employees Occupational 

5 Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 

6 7385s–15) is amended— 

7 (1) by amending subsection (c) to read as fol8 lows: 

9 ‘‘(c) DUTIES.—The duties of the Office shall be as 

10 follows: 

11 ‘‘(1) To assist individuals in making claims 

12 under this title. 

13 ‘‘(2) To provide information on the benefits 

14 available under this title and on the requirements 

15 and procedures applicable to the provision of such 

16 benefits. 

17 ‘‘(3) To act as an advocate under this title in 

18 appropriate instances, as determined by the Om19 budsman. 

20 ‘‘(4) To make recommendations to the Sec21 retary regarding the location of centers (to be known 

22 as ‘resource centers’) for the acceptance and devel23 opment of claims for benefits under this title. 

24 ‘‘(5) To carry out such other duties as the Sec25 retary shall specify.’’; 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HR 134 IH

1 (2) in subsection (e)(2), by adding at the end 

2 the following new subparagraph: 

3 ‘‘(C) Proposed changes in the administra4 tive practices of the Department of Labor to 

5 mitigate difficulties identified under subpara6 graph (B) and potential legislative changes 

7 which may be appropriate to mitigate such dif8 ficulties.’’; and 

9 (3) by striking subsection (g) (establishing a 

10 sunset date) and inserting the following: 

11 ‘‘(g) CONTRACT AUTHORITY.—The Ombudsman 

12 shall have authority to hire or contract for any supplies 

13 or services including the services of individuals with exper14 tise in relevant disciplines, including health physics, medi15 cine, industrial hygiene, and toxicology, as the Ombuds16 man may from time to time consider appropriate.’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




APPENDIX B-10



SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS


This Appendix B-10 summarizes the supplemental benefits payable to the named Participant under
the Plan.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Participant

	 	:
	 	Joseph M. Otting
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Formula — Part A

	 	:
	 	A pension benefit calculated in
accordance with the formula and
provisions of the Qualified Plan based
on 16 years of post-2001 service, plus
any unvested years of “Benefit
Service” under the Qualified Plan.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Formula — Part B

	 	:
	 	A pension benefit determined as in
Formula — Part A above, except that
any limitation imposed by Section
401(a)(17) or Section 415 of the Code
shall be ignored, less the pension
benefit determined in Part A above.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Formula Offset

	 	:
	 	The benefits provided under Formula A,
Formula B and the Excess Portion of
the Plan shall, in total, be reduced
by the Participant’s pension benefits
under the qualified and non-qualified
pension plans of Union Bank of
California (each of which shall be
considered an “offsetting benefit” for
purposes of this Appendix B-10).
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Form of Payment

	 	:
	 	Life annuity
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Vesting Service Start Date

	 	:
	 	From date of hire
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Vesting — Part A

	 	:
	 	Five (5) Years of Vesting Service, or,
if earlier, when employment is
terminated without Cause by the
Company or the employee terminates for
Good Reason following a Change of
Control
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Vesting — Part B

	 	:
	 	Age 55 and ten (10) Years of Vesting
Service, or, if earlier, when
employment is terminated without Cause
by the Company or the employee
terminates for Good Reason following a
Change of Control
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Unreduced Retirement Age

	 	:
	 	65
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Early Retirement Reduction

	 	:
	 	The early commencement factors set
forth in Section 4 of Appendix C of
the Qualified Plan.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Earliest Payout Date

	 	:
	 	Age 55
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Defined Terms

	 	:
	 	For purposes of this Appendix B-10,
the terms “Cause”, “Good Reason”, and
“Change of Control” shall have the
same meaning as such terms have for
purposes of the named Participant’s
written employment agreement.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Open Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ending December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Carl D. Blandino, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
and Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

                                              /s/ CARL D. BLANDINO
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                                Carl D. Blandino
                                  Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                                                  and Treasurer

March 16, 2005
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-18-00143-CR

Kevin L. Jones

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1531264D)

August 2, 2018

Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr__________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.1
 FIRST AMENDMENT
TO
LEASE
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE st LJH, LTD. AIRCRAFT
INTERIOR DESIGN, INC.
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 Amendment of Section
 TERM
 Amendment of Subsection (a) of Section
  Other Terms Not Amended




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 LJH LTD.
 By:
    
    DLH Management, L.L.C.,its General-partnerBy:
    
    /s/ Lacy J. HarberLacy J. Harber, President
 AIRCRAFT INTERIOR DESIGN, INC.
 By:
    
    /s/ Kevin CarterName:
    
    KEVIN CARTERTitle:
    
    V.P. TREASURER
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)**

**UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, John Quicke, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of NOVT Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 11, 2006
f8k0813_x101-riic.htm


    Exhibit 10.1
Resignation of Statenconsult

    
Royal Invest International Corp

    For
the attention of CEO Jerry Gruenbaum

    Center
Court Square Building

    116
Court Street, Suite 707

    New
Haven, Connecticut 06510

    


    Fax
Number:  + INT 1.203.226.8645

    


    October
24, 2008

    


    


    Subject:
Statutory directorship Royal Invest Dutch / European
operations

    


    This is
to confirm as per our telephone conversation of October 22, 2008 and following
the acceptance by the major shareholders of Royal Invest International Corp
(RIIC) that both you in the role of CEO of RIIC,  and the main
shareholders have agreed to dismiss Statenconsult / me from all my Statutory
Corporate European Responsibilities as of October 22 2008, upon my request. This
effects the scope of the services provided by Statenconsult as outlined in the
Management agreement between RIIC and Statenconsult.

    


    In view
of Statenconsult and Royal Invest’s rapidly growing business opportunities, and
the attention this requires, Statenconsult can no longer organize the minimal
professional management service level commitment for Royal Invest European
operation.

    


    I hereby
confirm to be fully cooperative in getting the new statutory director of Royal
Invest Europe up and running. Through the Amsterdam office it has been confirmed
that all necessary documents will be organised– including holding Statenconsult
BV harmless for its management services provided up to date. I would appreciate
it if you can follow this up.

    


    It was a
pleasure to be part of the Royal Invest team and wish you and the other team
members success in the further development of the Royal Invest
activities.

    


    Yours
sincerely,

    


    /s/ D.
Havenaar

    D.
Havenaar
<PAGE>

                  SUBSIDIARIES OF WILMINGTON TRUST CORPORATION

                                   EXHIBIT 21

<PAGE>

         Wilmington Trust Corporation has five direct subsidiaries, Wilmington
Trust Company, a Delaware-chartered bank and trust company, Wilmington Trust of
Pennsylvania, a Pennsylvania-chartered bank and trust company, Wilmington Trust
FSB, a Federally-chartered savings bank headquartered in Maryland, Rodney Square
Management Corporation, a registered investment adviser, and WT Investments,
Inc., a Delaware holding company. Wilmington Trust Company has the following
active direct subsidiaries:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       Name                                            Jurisdiction
                       ----                                            ------------
<S>                                                                   <C>
1.        Brandywine Insurance Agency, Inc.                           Delaware
2.        Brandywine Finance Corporation                              Delaware
3.        Brandywine Life Insurance Company, Inc.                     Delaware
4.        Compton Realty Corporation                                  Delaware
5.        Delaware Corporate Management, Inc.                         Delaware
6.        100 West Tenth Street Corporation                           Delaware
7.        WTC Corporate Services, Inc.                                Delaware
8.        Wilmington Brokerage Services Company                       Delaware
9.        Wilmington Trust Global Services, Ltd.                      Delaware
10.       Wilmington Trust (Cayman), Ltd.                             Cayman Islands
11.       Wilmington Trust (Channel Islands), Ltd.                    Channel Islands
</TABLE>

         Delaware Corporate Management, Inc. has three wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Special Services Delaware, Inc., and Organization Services, Inc.,
incorporated in Delaware, and Nevada Corporate Management, Inc., incorporated in
Nevada.

         WT Investments, Inc. has three wholly-owned subsidiaries, acquired on
January 2, 2003. Balentine Holdings, Inc. is incorporated in Georgia and owns
100% of the equity interests in Balentine Delaware Holding Company, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company. Balentine Delaware Holding Company, LLC owns
100% of Balentine & Company, LLC, a limited liability company organized under
Georgia law, and a 47.6% interest in Balentine & Company of Tennessee, L.L.C., a
limited liability company organized under Tennessee law.
EXHIBIT 12.1  Cephalon, Inc. Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (Amounts in thousands of dollars)  1999
  
  2000
  
  2001
  
  2002
  
  2003
  
  2004Pre-tax
  income (loss) from continuing operations
  
  (79,432
  )
  (93,744
  )
  (55,484
  )
  62,433
  
  130,314
  
  (28,184
  )Fixed
  charges:Interest
  expense and amortization of debt discount and premium on all indebtedness
  
  8,377
  
  5,189
  
  20,630
  
  38,215
  
  28,905
  
  22,186Appropriate
  portion of rentals
  
  907
  
  747
  
  1,092
  
  1,433
  
  2,286
  
  3,437Preferred
  stock dividend requirements of consolidated subsidiaries
  
  3,398
  
  9,063
  
  5,664
  
  
  
  
  
  Total fixed
  charges
  
  12,682
  
  14,999
  
  27,386
  
  39,648
  
  31,191
  
  25,623Pre-tax
  income (loss) from continuing operations, plus fixed charges, less preferred
  stock dividend requirements of consolidated subsidiaries
  
  (70,148
  )
  (87,808
  )
  (33,762
  )
  102,081
  
  161,505
  
  (2,561
  )Ratio of
  earnings to fixed charges (1)
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  2.57
  
  5.18
  
    
 (1)
  For the years ended December 31,
  1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001, no ratios are provided because earnings were
  insufficient to cover fixed charges and fixed charges and preferred
  dividends, respectively.
#### PACK v. DITTLINGER & DARE.

No. 10634.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Jan. 17, 1940.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 14, 1940.

Miller & Dawson, of Sinton, for appellant.

B. H. Kirk, of Robstown, for appellee.

NORVELL, Justice.

Dittlinger and Dare, appellees, brought suit upon a chattel mortgage against appellant, Pack, in the Justice’s Court, Precinct No. S, of Nueces County. Pack resided in Precinct No. 1, San Patricio County, and filed his plea of privilege, which was controverted by appellees, who assert that the case properly comes within the exceptions contained in subdivision 4 of Article 2390, and subdivision 5 of Article 1995, as amended by Acts of Forty-Fourth Legislature, c. 213, § 1, Vernon’s Annotated Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, in that the suit is based upon a contract of writing “providing for a promise of performance at Robstown in Precinct No. 5, Nueces County, Texas.”

The Justice of the Peace of the Robstown precinct overruled the plea of privilege, and upon this point an appeal was taken to the County Court of Nueces County, which also overruled the plea. From that decision, appellant brings the case here.

The appellees rely upon the wording of the chattel mortgage to sustain their position. This instrument is headed: “Retail Chattel Mortgage.” Immediately below and to the right of the heading appear the words: “To Dittlinger & Dare; Town and State: Robstown, Texas.” To the left and opposite the foregoing, the following appears: “Date: Aug. 28, 1937; Mortgagor: Sinton Baker & Cafe; Address: Sinton, Texas.” Below, and following these items, there appears a description of the mortgaged property and the terms of payment. Thereafter appear the following provisions: “Balance due by purchaser payable in 36 equal consecutive monthly installments of $10.81 each, commencing 1 Month(s) from date hereof.”

It is appellees’ contention that the words, “To Dittlinger & Dare; Town and State: Robstown, Texas,” are to be construed as designating the place of the payment of the money secured by the mortgage.

We cannot agree with this contention. The mere designation by name of the mortgagees and statement of the town and state in which they reside cannot be construed as promising performance at Robstown, Texas. Rathburn v. Royal, Tex.Civ.App., 281 S.W. 851; Nichols v. Ben Franklin Bond & Indemnity Corp., Tex.Civ.App., 81 S.W.2d 279.

The judgment will be reversed, and judgment will be here rendered sustaining *637the plea of privilege and directing the Clerk of the County Court of Nueces County to make up a transcript of all orders made in this cause, certify thereto under the seal of said court, and then transmit same with the original papers in the cause to the Justice’s Court for Precinct No. 1 of San Patricio County, Texas.
exv10w1



 








EXHIBIT 10.1





AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE CENTRUE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

2003 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




     WHEREAS, Centrue Financial Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Centrue Financial
Corporation 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has determined that it is in the
best interest of the Company to amend the Plan to provide the
Committee (as defined in the Plan)
additional authority with respect to the vesting and exercisability provisions set forth in option
agreements granted under the Plan.



     NOW THEREFORE, by virtue and in exercise of the amending power reserved to the Board under
Section 9 of the Plan, and pursuant to the authority delegated to the undersigned officer of the
Company by a resolution adopted by its Board, the Plan be and is hereby amended in the following
particulars, effective as of April 21, 2005:




	1.  	Section 5(b) of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
	 
	   	“(b)     Terms of Options. Each option granted under the Plan shall be subject
to the terms and conditions set forth by the Committee in the stock option agreement
including, without limitation, option price, vesting schedule and option term.”
	 
	2.  	The first sentence of Section 5(c) of the Plan is amended to begin as follows:
	 
	   	“(c)     Additional Terms Applicable to All Options. Unless otherwise provided
by the Committee, each option shall be subject to the following terms and
conditions:”
	 
	3.  	The first sentence of Section 5(d) of the Plan is amended to begin as follows:
	 
	   	“(d)     Additional Terms Applicable to Incentive Options. Unless otherwise
provided by the Committee, each Incentive Stock Option shall be subject to the
following terms and conditions:”





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, by action of the Board of Directors of the Company, the Company has caused
this First Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 21st day of April, 2005.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CENTRUE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Its: