alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,769,625               2,769,625
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,204,231               1,204,231
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,889                  40,889
<INVENTORY>                                     62,603                  62,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,432,717               4,432,717
<PP&E>                                       1,618,515               1,618,515
<DEPRECIATION>                                 537,263                 537,263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,915,185               5,915,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          977,231                 977,231
<BONDS>                                          9,172                   9,172
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,403,322               4,403,322
<COMMON>                                     9,801,362               9,801,362
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,275,902)             (9,275,902)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,915,185               5,915,185
<SALES>                                        209,988                 829,655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               300,808               1,028,047
<CGS>                                          207,901                 680,935
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  266,820                 828,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,705,685               3,389,269
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (33,225)                (62,414)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,638,472)             (3,127,181)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,638,472)             (3,127,181)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                    (929,231)             (1,136,964)
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,567,703)             (4,264,145)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.75)                  (1.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.75)                  (1.26)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND FOR
THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,412
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (413)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,873
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,493
<PP&E>                                          15,878
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,790)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,189
<BONDS>                                          1,160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                        (39)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,401
<SALES>                                         31,069
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,563
<CGS>                                           23,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,694
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,345
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,783)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       249
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,032)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,032)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.85)
<FN>
<F1>SEE NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 29, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40586

Summary Calendar

 

ALFREDO VASQUEZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RENE CASAREZ,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-02-CV-565

 

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alfredo Vasquez, Texas prisoner # 784866, filed a civil rights

action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Rene Casarez, a prison

employee. Vasquez alleged that Casarez filed disciplinary charges

against him in retaliation for a complaint Vasquez alleged against

Casarez. The district court, adopting the recommendations of a

magistrate judge, dismissed Vasquez’s action on the grounds that he

failed to properly exhaust administrative remedies before filing
142 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2003) (“No action shall be brought with

respect to prison conditions under section 1983 of this title, or

any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison,

or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies

as are available are exhausted.”). 

2Underwood v. Wilson, 151 F.3d 292, 296 (5th Cir. 1998)

(“Dismissal under § 1997e is made on pleadings without proof. As

long as the plaintiff has alleged exhaustion with sufficient

specificity, lack of admissible evidence in the record does not

form the basis for dismissal.”).

2

suit.1 Specifically, the district court concluded that, although

Vasquez administratively raised due process arguments, he never

presented his claim of retaliation to the prison grievance process.

Vasquez, however, alleged in his objections to the magistrate

judge’s recommendation that he specifically exhausted his

retaliation claims by filing the requisite forms in accordance with

the grievance procedures established by the Texas Department of

Criminal Justice. Although he did not provide the court with

copies of the forms, he nonetheless alleged with “sufficient

specificity” that he exhausted his claims.2 Because the defendant

presented no evidence disputing the plaintiff’s assertion, there

does not appear to be a proper basis at this time for dismissal for

failure to exhaust. Accordingly, the judgment of the district

court is VACATED, and Vasquez’s claims are REMANDED to the district

court for further consideration.
Schedule to Change in Control Agreement



 Exhibit 10.15(a) 
 Schedule to Change in Control Agreement 
 Horace Mann Educators Corporation (“HMEC”) and Horace Mann
Service Corporation (“HMSC”) entered into Change in Control Agreements with the following persons on the dates shown. These agreements are identical to the one included as Exhibit 10.15 to HMEC’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2008 and are the same type of agreement as the one included as Exhibit 10.7 to HMEC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, except that (1) the multiple of the annual base
salary and average of annual cash bonus paid to the employee in the last three years and (2) the specified period during which such employee’s insurance benefits would continue are equal to the duration below. 
  

					
	 Employee
	  	 Duration
	  	 Agreement Date

			
	 Thomas C. Wilkinson
	  	2.0 years	  	09-10-2008

  

 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2013

t1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2013

147715

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147715

COA: 310243 

Genesee CC: 10-027998-FC

WALTER EDWARD STEPHENS, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 30, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED 6/30/97 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   11-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          31,668
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,380
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,487
<INVENTORY>                                     13,921
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,819
<PP&E>                                          22,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,283
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        80,402
<OTHER-SE>                                    (43,453)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,945
<SALES>                                        101,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,924
<CGS>                                           47,571
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,610
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  55
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (267)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,489
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,756)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,756)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 237 (Friday, December 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 77031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date: Approximately 12 noon, Wednesday, December 13, 2000, 
following a recess at the conclusion of the open meeting.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: December 6, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-31440 Filed 12-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2





                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Lilly ICOS LLC:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-63790) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 33-48401, 33-80680, 33-64762, 333-08485,
333-78315, 333-72564 and 333-98071) on Form S-8 of ICOS Corporation of our
report dated January 30, 2003 with respect to the balance sheets of Lilly ICOS
LLC (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the
related statements of operations, comprehensive operations, members' equity
(deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2002 and the period from October 2, 1998 (inception) to December
31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form
10-K of ICOS Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington
March 10, 2003
II 

Calendar No. 290 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2274 

To provide for the compensation of Federal employees affected by lapses 

in appropriations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 21, 2017 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. CARPER, Mr. 

MARKEY, Mr. SCHATZ, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. HASSAN, Mrs. SHAHEEN, 

Mr. DURBIN, Mr. WARNER, Mr. LEAHY, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. UDALL, Mrs. 

MURRAY, Mr. BROWN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. KAINE, 

Ms. WARREN, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read the first time 

JANUARY 3, 2018 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To provide for the compensation of Federal employees 

affected by lapses in appropriations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Fair 

5 Treatment Act of 2017’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2274 PCS

1 SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES AF2 FECTED BY A LAPSE IN APPROPRIATIONS. 

3 Section 1341 of title 31, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘An offi6 cer’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as specified in this sub7 chapter or any other provision of law, an officer’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(c)(1) In this subsection— 

11 ‘‘(A) the term ‘covered lapse in appropriations’ 

12 means any lapse in appropriations that begins on or 

13 after December 22, 2017; and 

14 ‘‘(B) the term ‘excepted employee’ means an ex15 cepted employee or an employee performing emer16 gency work, as such terms are defined by the Office 

17 of Personnel Management. 

18 ‘‘(2) Each Federal employee furloughed as a result 

19 of a covered lapse in appropriations shall be paid for the 

20 period of the lapse in appropriations, and each excepted 

21 employee who is required to perform work during a cov22 ered lapse in appropriations shall be paid for such work, 

23 at the employee’s standard rate of pay, at the earliest date 

24 possible after the lapse in appropriations ends, regardless 

25 of scheduled pay dates. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2274 PCS

1 ‘‘(3) During a covered lapse in appropriations, each 

2 excepted employee who is required to perform work shall 

3 be entitled to use leave under chapter 63 of title 5, or 

4 any other applicable law governing the use of leave by the 

5 excepted employee, for which compensation shall be paid 

6 at the earliest date possible after the lapse in appropria7 tions ends, regardless of scheduled pay dates.’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 290 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2274 

A BILL 

To provide for the compensation of Federal 

employees affected by lapses in appropriations. 

JANUARY 3, 2018 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO.  2-05-281-CR

JIMMY C. BURGETT	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 97TH DISTRICT COURT OF MONTAGUE COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Jimmy C. Burgett, pro se, attempts to appeal the trial court’s order dismissing his indictment for possession of a controlled substance.  We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

	Pursuant to rule 26.2 of the rules of appellate procedure, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the day the trial court enters an appealable order.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).  The trial court dismissed Appellant’s indictment on May 27, 2005.  His notice of appeal was due on June 27, 2005.  Appellant filed his notice of appeal on July 18, 2005.  In his notice of appeal, Appellant explained that he did not receive notice of the May 27 dismissal until July 8 and attached as proof an envelope from the Montague County District Clerk bearing a postage meter date of July 6.

	On July 26, 2005, we notified Appellant of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over the appeal because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.  We informed him that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal by August 5.  See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3.  We have not received a response.

	In order for this court to grant an extension of time to file a notice of appeal, both the notice of appeal and a motion for extension of time must be filed within the fifteen-day extension period of rule 26.3.  See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).  Applying the rule 26.3 extension period to this case means that Appellant’s notice of appeal and motion for extension of time were due on July 12, 2005.  Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until July 18 and did not file a motion for extension of time at all.

	A timely notice of appeal is essential to vest this court with jurisdiction.  See id.; Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).  Because Appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely, we have no jurisdiction over his appeal.  See Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 526.  Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b), 43.2(f).	

							PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  August 25, 2005
#### SADLER v. STATE.

No. 16901.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 6, 1934.

P. P. Long, of Carthage, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for‘the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The appellant Charlie Sadler and Will Spearman were jointly indicted for the offense. It seems that both Sadler and Spear-man sought a severance. ' The court granted the severance and Sadler was tried first.

The evidence heard upon the trial is not brought before this court for review.

A suspended sentence was sought and properly submitted in the charge of the court. The jury declined to accord the suspended sentence.

In the absence of the facts, this court is not in a position to pass upon the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

Perceiving no error, the judgment is affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

    I, Peter Boneparth, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Annual Report of Jones Apparel Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of Jones ApparelGroup, Inc.

By: /s/ Peter Boneparth

Name: Peter Boneparth Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

 

*A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and will be retainedby Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.*

 

    I, Wesley R. Card, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Annual Report of Jones Apparel Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of Jones ApparelGroup, Inc.

By: /s/ Wesley R. Card

Name: Wesley R. Card Title: Chief Operating and Financial Officer

 

*A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and will be retainedby Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.*
EXHIBIT 10.34

CoreStates Bank, NA
FC 1-8-3 12
1345 Chestnut Street
PO Box 7618
Philadelphia PA 19101-7618
215 973 7397
Fax 215 973 6745

James P Richards
Vice President
Southeast Corporate
                                                                 
August 15, 1996


Wesley R. Card
Chief Financial Officer
JONES APPAREL GROUP
250 Rittenhouse Circle
Bristol, PA 19007



Dear Wes:

I take great pleasure in advising you that we have approved in favor of Jones
Apparel Group the following credit facilities:

       I) A $75,000,000 discretionary line of credit for the issuance of
          documentary import letters of credit having a tenor of up to
          180 days.

      II) A $25,000,000 discretionary line of credit available for working
          capital loans and/or documentary import letters of credit.

Included in the facilities outlined above, there are sublimits available for 
standby letters of credit and bankers' acceptances.

I'm assembling any new documentation we may require and shall forward it to you
under separate cover.


We're extremely pleased with the volume of new business we have seen and trust
that these credit facilities will serve to clearly demonstrate our confidence 
in the Jones Apparel Group and its management.



Sincerely,

/s/ James P. Richards



JPR/chc

cc: Gary R. Klocek