alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
August 14, 2015

Mr. Albertico Navarro

Battery Ion, Inc.

P.O. Box 19274

Newbury Park, CA 91319

Dear Mr. Navarro:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

p art 21, S ubpart H and §§ 45.23, 61.23(a) and (c), 61.113(a) and (b), 61.133(a), 61.315(c)(2)

and (3), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2) and (c), 91.109(a), 91.119, 91.121, 91. 151(a), 91.203(a) and (b),

91.319(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14,

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and

what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your May 11, 2015

, exemption request on behalf of Battery Ion, Inc. into the

public docket (No. FAA− 2015

− 1877 ), but we are unable to process your request any further.

The information you sent does no t comply with th e requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed).

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Avia tion Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 1 1.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

I f you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3
Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We have issued our report  dated March 10, 2006  accompanying  the  consolidated
financial  statements of Synergy Brands, Inc. and subsidiaries  appearing in the
2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2005,  which is
incorporated by reference in the Registration  Statement No.  333-126539 on Form
S-3/A.  We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement of the aforementioned  report and to the use of our name as it appears
under the caption "Experts".

/s/ Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP
Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP
Melville, New York
March 30, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 238 (Monday, December 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 77364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31421]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2651-006 Indiana]


Indiana Michigan Power Company; Notice of Availability of Final 
Environmental Assessment

December 5, 2000.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of the Energy Projects has reviewed the application for a new license 
for the Elkhart Hydroelectric Project, and has prepared a final 
environmental assessment (FEA). The project is located on the St. 
Joseph River in the City of Elkhart and Elkhart County, Indiana.
    On April 10, 2000, the Commission staff issued a draft 
environmental assessment (DEA) for the project and requested that 
comments be filed with the Commission within 45 days. Comments on the 
DEA were filed by Walter D. Gildner, Indiana Department of Natural 
Resources, American Electric Power/ Indiana Michigan Power Company, and 
the City of Elkhart and are addressed in the FEA.
    Copies of the FEA are available for review at the Commission's 
Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, 
D.C. 20426, or by calling (202) 208-1371. The FEA may be viewed on the 
web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm [please call (202) 208-
2222 for assistance].

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-31421 Filed 12-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### ABRAMSON v. STATE.

No. 14958.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 2, 1932.

Upton & Upton, O’Neal Dendy, and Robert Hughes, all of San Angelo, for appellant.

O. C. Fisher, Co. Atty., of San Angelo, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for aggravated assault; punishment, a fine of $250.

Appellant was convicted as an adult male, who had made an assault upon a female.

Glickman, accompanied by appellant, went to the store of Martin for the purpose of beating him up. Martin was away, but as soon as he returned Glickman attacked him. Mrs.Martin attempted to aid her husband. The state’s claim rests upon the proposition that appellant unlawfully caught hold of and assaulted Mrs. Martin. The defensive testimony. consisted almost entirely of that of appellant and Glickman, who had pleaded guilty and paid a fine for aggravated assault. Glickman swore that -appellant did nothing to Mrs. Martin. Appellant testified to the same facts. Several witnesses for the state testified that appellant grabbed Mrs. Martin and struck her.

We would not reverse this case on the proposition that the proof does not show that appellant was an adult male,' though, upon another trial, if had, this point should be more clearly established.

Appellant supported his motion for new trial by the affidavits of two witnesses, seemingly disinterested, both of whom said they saw the-difficulty, and swore to facts which, if believed by the jury, might change the result of the trial, and each of whom further swears that he did not disclose his knowledge of the difficulty, or the facts.to which he would testify, to either appellant or his attorney until after this conviction. Glickman *304being appellant’s only witness beside bimself, and it appearing that he was an employee of appellant, and that he had been himself prosecuted and convicted for participation in the same difficulty, and had paid a fine therefor, he could hardly be deemed an- unprejudiced or disinterested witness. The newly discovered evidence was from parties disinterested and not related to, or connected in any way, with appellant. We therefore are unable to conclude that their testimony would be but cumulative; nor can we feel that it might not bring about a different result. We might set out their testimony, but see no particular good to come from such course. Both (Rickman and appellant testified that the latter did not strike or take hold of Mrs. Martin. Both newly discovered witnesses affirmed their ability to see, and the fact that they did see said difficulty, and that appellant did not strike or take hold of Mrs. Martin within their knowledge. Believing the newly discovered evidence to be material, and from credible sources, and not merely cumulative, it becomes our duty to reverse this case.,

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

MORROW, P. X, absent.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trimol Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.





No purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose.  The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.








/s/ Jack BravermanJack BravermanChief Financial OfficerTRIMOL GROUP, INC.








August 16, 2010





[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Trimol Group, Inc. and will be retained by Trimol Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
**CERTIFICATIONS**





**Certificate
      Pursuant to**





18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Phlo Corporation and Subsidiaries (the
      "Company") the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2007
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, James B. Hovis, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      February 14, 2008









*/s/
                James B.
                Hovis*
              *James
                B. Hovis*
              *Chief
                Executive Officer*
              *Principal
                Financial Officer*







15
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
 2.
 3.
 4.
 c)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;d)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Dated: August 4, 2009
    /s/ Matthew K. FustMatthew K. FustExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2 Section 906 Certification




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Golden Eagle International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K, Amendment No. 1 for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tracy A. Madsen, Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)               The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: June13, 2011
/s/ Tracy A. MadsenTracy A. MadsenPrincipal Financial Officer




This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and statement of Income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000872467
<NAME> KRUPP GOVERNMENT INCOME TRUST-II
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       9,214,592
<SECURITIES>                               270,610,368<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,264,687
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,207,068<F2>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             298,296,715
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,609,139<F3>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   296,565,241
<OTHER-SE>                                     122,235<F4>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               298,296,715
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,876,931<F5>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,877,749<F6>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,999,182
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         14,999,182
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,999,182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .82
<FN>
<F1>Includes Participating Insured Mortgage Investments ("PIMSIs") (insured
mortgages of $150,454,030 and Additional Loans of $29,952,351), Participating
Insured Mortgages ("PIMs") of $49,622,337 and Mortgage-Backed Securities
("MBS") of $40,581,650.
<F2>Includes prepaid acquisition fees and expenses of $16,483,642 net of
accumulated amortization of $4,510,838 and prepaid participating servicing of
$5,494,547 net of accumulated amortization of $1,260,283.
<F3>Includes deferred income on Additional Loans of $1,582,054.
<F4>Unrealized loss on MBS.
<F5>Represents interest income on investments in mortgages and cash.
<F6>Includes $2,094,905 of amortization for prepaid fees and expenses.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### HOLLIS v. STATE.

No. 20144.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 1, 1939.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for theft, a felony; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. No error has been perceived which would authorize a reversal of the conviction. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT NO.    


TO THE EMPLOYEE RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD


 


TOREADOR RESOURCES CORPORATION


2005 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This
AMENDMENT NO.      (this “Amendment”)
is made this      day of                     ,
2008 by and between Toreador Resources Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), and                                 
(the “Participant”), to that
certain Restricted Stock Award Agreement (the “Agreement”)
by and between the Company and the Participant dated                                 ,
            .  Terms used in this Amendment with initial
capital letters that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Agreement, or to the extent such terms are not
defined in the Agreement, the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Toreador
Resources Corporation 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Plan and the Agreement,
the Company awarded to the Participant [# of shares]
shares of Restricted Stock; and


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section     
of the Agreement, the Agreement may be amended if the amendment is in writing
and signed by the Company and the Participant; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Participant desire to amend the
Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises,
conditions and covenants contained herein and in the Agreement, and for other
good and valuable consideration, the Company and the Participant hereby amend the
Agreement as follows:


 


1.         Section 3 of the
Agreement is hereby amended by amending and restating the last sentence of Section 3
to be as follows:


 


Notwithstanding
the foregoing, in the event that while the Participant is employed by (or if
the Participant is a Consultant, is providing services to) the Company or a
Subsidiary, (i) a Change in Control occurs, then immediately prior to the
effective date of such Change in Control, the total Awarded Shares not
previously vested shall thereupon immediately become fully vested or (ii) the
Participant dies, the total Awarded Shares not previously vested shall
immediately become vested upon the Participant’s death.


 


2.         Except as amended
hereby, the terms of the Agreement shall remain in full effect.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the
day and year first set forth above.


 


	
   

  	
  TOREADOR
  RESOURCES CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  PARTICIPANT

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:
Exhibit
10.1

Compensation Arrangements

Non-Employee
Members of Board of Managers

On March 9, 2005, the Board of
Managers of Allied Security Holdings LLC (the
"Company") adopted a compensation arrangement
for the independent members of the Board of Managers pursuant to which
such independent members would receive compensation for 2005 Board
membership of $50,000 and $1,000 for each Board meeting attended. The
Audit Committee Chairperson would also receive $10,000 and each other
committee chairperson would receive $5,000 for their service as
chairpersons, and each committee member would receive $1,000 for each
committee meeting attended.

Senior Management

Effective May 6, 2005, the Company caused to be increased base
salaries for fiscal year 2005 payable to its Chief Financial Officer,
William A. Torzolini, and its Executive Vice President, Mark P.
Desrosiers, in each case as part of annual salary increases. Mr.
Torzolini's salary increased from $245,000 per annum to $290,000
per annum, and Mr. Desrosiers' base salary increased from
$215,000 per annum to $235,000 per annum.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TYRONE L. WILLIAMS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee

.

No. 4D2022

- 3246

[ January 18, 2024 ]

Appeal from the C ircuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit , St.

Lucie County ; Lawrence M. Mirman , Judge; L.T. Case No.

562019CF002031A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine

Germanowicz, Assistan t Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, D AMOORGIAN and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                   CAREY INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES INCORPORATED

                  CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Carey Institutional Properties
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), we, William Polk Carey, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Gordon F. DuGan, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of our knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ William Polk Carey                   /s/ Gordon F. DuGan
    ---------------------------              ---------------------------

    William Polk Carey                       Gordon F. DuGan
    Chairman                                 Vice Chairman
    (Co-Chief Executive Officer)             (Co-Chief Executive Officer)
          3/19/04                                   3/19/04
    ---------------------------              ---------------------------
    Date                                     Date

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Carey Institutional Properties
Incorporated and will be retained by Carey Institutional Properties Incorporated
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.