alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to said statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                         577,321
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  86,478
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    175,227
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               859,281
<PP&E>                                         86,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,600,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          221,503
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    7,500
<COMMON>                                       373
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,371,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,600,770
<SALES>                                        146,362
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               146,362
<CGS>                                          148,461
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  480,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,521
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (473,968)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (473,968)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (473,968)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.13)
        


</TABLE>
Tribal Consultation for the Draft 2016 NPDES Pesticide General Permit

Tuesday, November 19, 2015, 2:30 PM EST

Summary

Tribes Participating - 7

Region 5

Fond du Lac Tribe

Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe

Region 6

Chickasaw Nation

Tonkawa Tribe

Region 9

Three Tribes from California

EPA Staff Participating

Allison Wiedeman, HQ, Branch Chief

Prasad Chumble, HQ, Team Lead

Jennifer Chan, HQ, Team Member

Gary Hudiburgh, HQ, Team Member

Felicia Wright, HQ, OW Tribal Coordinator

Reg 1

Reg 5 

Presentation

Ms. Wiedeman welcomed the tribal representatives to the tribal consultation call on the 

reissuance of EPA’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Pesticide 

General Permit (PGP). Mr. Chumble reviewed the specifics of the October 26, 2015, tribal 

consultation notification letter and led the tribes through a power point presentation that provided 

an overview of the PGP, possible new 2016 PGP requirements, its use by tribes, and the permit 

issuance schedule.

During the discussion, one tribal representative asked what is the time line for 401 certification? 

EPA staff answered, at the same time as we propose the permit, the Regional office will notify 

its Tribes (and states) that have approved Water Quality Standard authority of the opportunity to 

provide 401 certification. We provide a period of time, not to exceed 60 days.

EPA did not receive any official consultation comments on the proposed PGP reissuance during 

the consultation and coordination period (October 27, 2015 to December 10, 2015).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,054
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,258
<ALLOWANCES>                                       745
<INVENTORY>                                     34,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,990
<PP&E>                                         336,105
<DEPRECIATION>                                  51,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 376,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,390
<BONDS>                                        196,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                     112,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   376,493
<SALES>                                        262,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               262,271
<CGS>                                          205,037
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  205,037
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,755
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   285
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,868
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,326
<INCOME-TAX>                                       930
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,396
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,396
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
Termination of 1999 Server Farm Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 

 
  

			
		  	Valassis
		  	19975 Victor Parkway
		  	 Livonia, MI 48152
 Tel
734.591.3000


 February 1, 2008 
 Mr. John Boutross 
 Delivery Director, Media and Entertainment 
 IBM Global Services 
 294 Route 100 
 Somers, NY 10589 
 RE: Termination of 1999 Server Farm Agreement 
 Dear Mr. Boutross: 
 Reference is made in this letter to the July 21, 1999 Agreement for Server Farm Management
(the “Agreement”) between Valassis Direct Mail, Inc., formerly known as ADVO, Inc. (“Valassis”), and International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”). Capitalized terms used in this letter and not otherwise defined
shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement. 
 This letter is to confirm that Valassis intends to terminate the Agreement effective as of
July 31, 2008 (the “Termination Effective Date”). 
 Notwithstanding this notice of termination of the Agreement, Valassis may exercise any of
its rights and IBM shall perform all of its obligations described under Section 10.4 of the Agreement, provided that Valassis provides written notice of its intention to exercise such rights in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.

 For the avoidance of doubt, for a period of five years after the Termination Effective Date, the obligations of IBM and Valassis regarding Confidential
Information as set forth paragraphs b through d of Section 9.2 of the Agreement shall survive the termination of the Agreement. 
 We will be in touch
with you shortly to discuss final plans for the wind down of the Services under the Agreement. 
  

	
	Best regards,
	
	/s/ John Lieblang
	John Lieblang
	SVP, Chief Information Officer
	 Information Technology
 Valassis



  

			
	CC:	 	Norm Korey, IBM Global Services
		 	Rich Sammon, IBM Global Services
		 	Bill Blackmer, Valassis
		 	Dave Hennessey, Valassis
		 	Darrell Ward, Valassis
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Proteon, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-85524 and File No. 333-31055) of our
reports dated February 11, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Proteon, Inc. as of December 31,
1997 and 1996, and for the three years ended December 31, 1997 which reports are
included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                             /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 1998
<page>		       EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Select L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey D. Hahn,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.








By:	  /s/	Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:		Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 15, 2004
#### Janet Andrews, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Gregory Andrews, et al., Appellants, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 73981.)

In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the claimants appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Silverman, J.), dated December 1, 1988, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the claim.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

This claim arose out of an automobile accident on Montauk Highway (New York State Route 27A) in West Islip. The claimant Janet Andrews (hereinafter the claimant) was traveling southbound on McCall Avenue to the "T” intersection with Montauk Highway. A stop sign at the corner of McCall and Montauk controlled southbound traffic at this juncture. According to the testimony elicited at the trial, the claimant failed to stop at the traffic sign and to yield the right-of-way before crossing over the westbound lanes of Montauk Highway in order to execute a lefthand turn in an easterly direction. The claimant’s automobile was struck by another automobile which was traveling westbound. The claimant contends that the State had failed to maintain Montauk Highway in a reasonably safe condition, in view of the limited sight distance of 310 feet (rather than the 425 feet suggested by the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials) for drivers making lefthand turns at this type of intersection.

It is well established that the State is not an insurer of the safety of its roads and no liability will attach unless the ascribed negligence of the State in maintaining its roads in a *475reasonable condition is a proximate cause of the accident *(see, Stanford v State of New York,*167 AD2d 381; *Hearn v State of New York,*157 AD2d 883). Here the record established that the State had conducted a study of a four tenths of a mile section of Montauk Highway, including the McCall intersection, after receiving notice of the existing dangerous conditions. The study was adequate and had a reasonable basis *(see, Alexander v Eldred,*63 NY2d 460), and, as a result, improvements were made to this stretch of the roadway. In all, there was insufficient proof to conclude that the State’s action or inaction was a proximate cause of the accident. Rather, the claimant’s own failure to exercise due care under the circumstances proximately caused the accident *(see, Demesmin v Town of Islip,*147 AD2d 519).

We have considered the remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Lawrence, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

CYNTHIA A. F'RANDRIA NO. 2021 CW 1324

VERSUS

SUSAN M. GARDNER, ET AL. FEBRUARY 14, 2022

In Re: Cynthia A. Frandria, applying for supervisory writs, 

21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, 

No. 2020-- 0001051. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. The relator Cynthia A. Frandria' s motion to

appeal and her motion and second request for devolutive appeal

were not timely filed. Notice of the August 31, 2020, judgment

at issue was mailed on September 14, 2020. Ms. Frandria filed

her motion for appeal an February 22, 2021, and her motion and

second request for appeal on June 17, 2021. Under La. Code Civ. 

P. art. 2087, Ms. Frandria' s motions for appeal were not timely

filed. Without a showing of timeliness, we have no jurisdiction

to consider her writ application. See Sanchez Law Firm, LLC v. 

Sherman, 2018- 0416 ( La. App. lst Cir. 7/ 11/ 18), 2018 WL 3388030, 

2 ( unpublished)("[ T] he defect of not taking an appeal timely is

jurisdictional, and neither counsel, the trial court, nor the

appellant court has the authority to extend this delay.") 

citation omitted). 

PMC

JEW

MRT

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK 3F COURT

FOR THE COURT
November 18, 2008

James Goldstene

Executive Officer

California Air Resources Board

PO Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 95812

SUBJECT: Submittal of State Implementation Pl an Revision for Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT SIP)

Dear Mr. Goldstene:

Enclosed are four (4) copies of a revision to the St ate Implementation Plan (SIP) that was adopted by the

Board of Directors of the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District on October 23, 2008. This SIP revision was adopted pursuant to 40 CFR 51.192 and meets the requirements for Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) in accordance with Sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f) of the federal

Clean Air Act.

No comments were received from the public or U.S. EPA during the notice period or at the public hearing
for this SIP revision.

The SIP revision includes commitments to adopt requireme nts in Rule 450, Graphic Arts Operations, for mandatory control equipment for flexible packaging pr inting, offset lithographic printing, and letterpress printing presses with potential to em it, prior to controls, of at least 25 tons per year of VOC, and more stringent fountain solution requirements for offset lit hographic printing operations with actual emissions of at least 450 pounds per month of VOC. The SIP revision also includes commitments to adopt more stringent requirements in Rule 451, Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products, for metal furniture coating operations with actual VOC emissi ons of at least 3 tons per 12-month rolling period and to increase the required overall control efficienc y to 90 %. The aforementioned commitments were satisfied by amendments to Rule 450 and 451 a dopted on October 23, 2008 and September 25, 2008, respectively.

The RACT SIP submittal contains the following enclosures: 1. Board letter; 2. Signed Board resolution; 3. Adopted SIP revision; 4. Staff Report that documents our a nalysis of the RACT requirements; 5. Evidence of Public Notice;

If you have any questions regarding the enclosed SIP s ubmittal, you may contact me at (916) 874-4802.

Sincerely,

Larry Greene

Executive Director/Air Pollution Control Officer Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD

c: Brigette Tollstrup Laura Lawrence, CARB

Enclosures
Order entered August 1 9 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 21 - 00264 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF M.C. AND J.C., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Cou rt

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 10 - 03756 - U

O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s motion to recuse Justice Schenck. Justice Schenck voluntarily recuse s himself from this appeal. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED

. /s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 UNITED
STATES CODE

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of CITGO Petroleum Corporation (the "Registrant"), does
hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 of
the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.

Dated: May 7, 2004                         /s/ Luis Marin
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name: Luis Marin
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MEDIMMUNE,
INC'S YEARLY REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FILING
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          36,570
<SECURITIES>                                   233,824
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,894
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,777
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               401,838
<PP&E>                                          87,452
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 648,424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,952
<BONDS>                                         10,366
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           679
<OTHER-SE>                                     536,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   648,424
<SALES>                                        356,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               383,375
<CGS>                                           90,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  306,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 86,276
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,095)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             93,371
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    93,371
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.33


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OSCAR SANCHEZ-ORDAZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-70147 

Agency No. A095-736-873 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 3, 2020**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Oscar Sanchez-Ordaz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming without opinion an 

immigration judge’s decision denying cancellation of removal. We dismiss the 

petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Sanchez-Ordaz’s sole, unexhausted 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-70147 

contention that his conviction would be eligible for Federal First Offender Act 

treatment. See Zara v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 927, 931 (9th Cir. 2004) (“the 

exhaustion requirement applies to ‘streamlined’ cases”); Garcia-Cortez v. 

Ashcroft, 366 F.3d 749, 753 (9th Cir. 2004) (“The Notice of Appeal is sufficiently 

specific if the alien explains in a short and plain statement exactly how and why 

the IJ erred. . . . [C]onclusory or generalized statements that the IJ abused his 

discretion or wrongfully ordered the alien’s removal fail to meet the specificity 

requirement, because they do not meaningfully direct the BIA in its review.”). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Numerex Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stratton J.
Nicolaides, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of
my knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates and periods covered by
the Report. This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Executive
Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law. March 23, 2005
    
    /s/ Stratton J. NicolaidesStratton J. NicolaidesChief Executive Officer
 65
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23 - Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Genesis Health Ventures, Inc.:

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-101004) and the registration statements on Form
S-8 (No. 333-82200, No. 333-82208, No. 333-83430, No. 333-100800) of Genesis
Health Ventures, Inc. of our reports dated September 30, 2003, with respect to
the consolidated balance sheets of Genesis Health Ventures, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the "Company") as of September 30, 2002 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity (deficit), and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2002,
and the related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the
September 30, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Genesis Health Ventures, Inc.

         Our reports contain an explanatory paragraph that states that the
Company has restated the consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period
ended September 30, 2001.

         Our reports also contain an explanatory paragraph that refers to a
change in accounting for the costs of start-up activities effective October 1,
1999.

         In addition, our reports contain an explanatory paragraph that states
that on October 2, 2001 the Company consummated a Joint Plan of Reorganization
(the "Plan") which had been confirmed by the United States Bankruptcy Court. The
Plan resulted in a change in ownership of the Company and, accordingly,
effective September 30, 2001 the Company accounted for the change in ownership
through "fresh-start" reporting. As a result, the consolidated information prior
to September 30, 2001 is presented on a different cost basis than that as of and
subsequent to September 30, 2001 and, therefore, is not comparable.

                                  /s/ KPMG LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
October 10, 2003