alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 238 (Monday, December 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 77389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31460]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AK-040-1410-01; AA-82263]


Realty Action: FLPMA Sec. 302 Lease, Iliamna Lake

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Realty Action, Lease of Public Land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Mr. Ted J. Forsi has submitted an application to lease public 
land. The lease is to be used in conjunction with an existing Special 
Recreation Permit (SRP). He has held the SRP since 1992. The Permit 
allows him to guide hunting and fishing clients. He requests to convert 
the following tent structures into cabins at his existing camp:

(1) 24' x 24' Lodge/Cabin
(2) 14' x 16' Cabin
(3) 10' x 12' Cabin
(4) 10' x 12' Cabin

    The proposed lease is located approximately 10 miles northwest of 
Iliamna Lake and is described as:

Seward Meridian, Alaska

T. 7 S., R. 40 W., Sec. 17

    Containing approximately 2 acres, more or less.

    The State of Alaska has selected the land for conveyance and the 
applicant must obtain their concurrence.
    The land has been examined and found suitable for lease under the 
provisions of Section 302 of the Federal Land Policy Act and 43 CFR 
Part 2920.
    The lessee shall reimburse the United States for reasonable 
administrative fees and monitoring of construction, operation, 
maintenance, and rehabilitation of the land authorized. The 
reimbursement of costs shall be in accordance with the provisions of 43 
CFR 2920.6.
    The lease will be offered for a term of 10 years and will require 
the lessee to pay rent at no less than fair market value.
    Detailed information concerning this action is available for review 
at the office of the Bureau of Land Management, Anchorage Field Office, 
6881 Abbott Loop Road, Anchorage, Alaska, 99507-2599.

DATES: Interested parties may submit comments on or before January 25, 
2001 to the Field Manager, Anchorage Field Office, 6881 Abbott Loop 
Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99507-2599. In the absence of a timely 
objection, this proposed Realty Action will become final.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shirley Rackley, Anchorage Field 
Office, Bureau of Land Management, 6881 Abbott Loop Road, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99507-2599; (907) 267-1289 or toll free (1-800) 478-1263.

     Dated: November 28, 2000.
Stuart Hirsh,
Field Manager (Acting).
[FR Doc. 00-31460 Filed 12-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2651-006 Indiana]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of the Energy Projects has reviewed the application for a new license for the Elkhart Hydroelectric Project, and has prepared a final environmental assessment (FEA). The project is located on the St. Joseph River in the City of Elkhart and Elkhart County, Indiana.

On April 10, 2000, the Commission staff issued a draft environmental assessment (DEA) for the project and requested that comments be filed with the Commission within 45 days. Comments on the DEA were filed by Walter D. Gildner, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, American Electric Power/ Indiana Michigan Power Company, and the City of Elkhart and are addressed in the FEA.

Copies of the FEA are available for review at the Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, or by calling (202) 208-1371. The FEA may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm [please call (202) 208-2222 for assistance].

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-31421  Filed 12-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20058 Conference Calendar

IVO NABELEK, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus DENISE COLLINS, Judge, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CV-4083

-------------------- August 20, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ivo Nabelek (“Nabelek”), Texas state prisoner #669748, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his writ of mandamus petition for lack of jurisdiction. Because his claims are not cognizable for habeas review, Nabelek’s request for a certificate of appealability (COA) is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY. Nabelek argues that under 28 U.S.C. § 1651, the district court has jurisdiction to order a Texas state court judge to ruleNo. 02-20058 -2- on his pending motions. Federal courts are empowered to "issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law."
See 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). The relief requested by Nabelek would not be in aid of the jurisdiction of a federal court. The district court did not err in dismissing Nabelek’s mandamus petition because the court lacked authority to issue a writ of mandamus directing the state court to rule on Nabelek’s pending motions. See Moye v. Clerk, DeKalb County Superior
Court , 474 F.2d 1275, 1276 (5th Cir. 1973). Nabelek’s appeal presents no issue of arguable merit and is, therefore, dismissed as frivolous. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
DENY COA AS UNNECESSARY; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
Exhibit
32.1




Written
Statement of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Jeffersonville Bancorp (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
hereby certifies to his knowledge on the date hereof, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Jeffersonville Bancorp and will be retained
by Jeffersonville Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
      Wayne V. ZanettiWayne
      V. ZanettiMarch 23, 2010
                  President
      and Chief Executive
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,830
<SECURITIES>                                       111
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,620
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,589
<INVENTORY>                                     47,606
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,201
<PP&E>                                          45,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 319,161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116,894
<BONDS>                                         12,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,994
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   319,161
<SALES>                                        244,525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               244,525
<CGS>                                           45,005
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,926
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   705
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,034
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,293
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,267
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,267
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.68
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Colin W. Stewart, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, and Nancy C. Broadbent, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                    | /s/ Colin W. Stewart    |
|--------------------|-------------------------|
| Dated: May 3, 2007 | Colin W. Stewart        |
|               | Chief Executive Officer |
|               |                    |
|               | /s/ Nancy C. Broadbent  |
| Dated: May 3, 2007 | Nancy C. Broadbent      |
|               | Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CollaGenexPharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
ACCEPTED

04-15-00046-CR

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

6/3/2015 3:52:34 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 06/03/2015 3:52:34 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7676

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BENNIE JAY EATMON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CR-00-127-BO; CA-03-679-5-BO)

Submitted: December 16, 2005 Decided: February 2, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bennie Jay Eatmon, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis M. Duffy, Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM: 

Bennie Jay Eatmon, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal

the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)

motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

§ 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and Eatmon’s supplemental filings and conclude that Eatmon

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, although we grant

Eatmon’s motions to amend, we deny a certificate of appealability

and dismiss the appeal. We further deny Eatmon’s motion for

discovery, motion for abeyance, and motion for a new trial. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-122-000]

Take notice that on November 30, 2000, Chandeleur Pipe Line Company Pipe Line (Chandeleur) tendered for filing proposed changes in its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 5, with an effective date of January 1, 2001.

Chandeleur states that it is proposing to change it's Fuel and Line Loss Allowance from 0.2% to 0.0%, to become effective January 1, 2001.

Chandeleur states that copies of the filing were served upon the company's jurisdictional customers and state regulatory commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-31428 Filed 12-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Jones Apparel Group, Inc.New York, New YorkWe hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus constituting a part
of the Registration Statements on Form S-8 filed May 15, 1996, August 23, 1999
and August 2, 2001 of our reports dated February 2, 2004 relating to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and subsidiaries
appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003.We also consent to the reference to us under the
caption of "Experts" in the Prospectus.

/s/ BDO Seidman,
      LLPBDO Seidman, LLP


New York, New YorkMarch 12, 2004
*OPINION ISSUED JANUARY 18, 2008*

#### JAMES W. DICKENS VS. WV STATE POLICE

(CC-07-343)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

John A. Hoyer and Virginia G. Lanham, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks to recover $2,475.00 for the cost of his 1994 Ford F150 truck which he entrusted to respondent in the course of a police investigation. On July 26, 2007, claimant informed respondent that his truck was stolen, and later that day, respondent notified claimant that his truck was found. Respondent requested that claimant leave the truck in the location where it was discovered in order to further an investigation regarding mine thefts. Claimant agreed to leave his truck under respondent’s supervision to further this investigation. However, on July 27, 2007, claimant’s truck was burned by the individual who originally stole the vehicle. Thus, claimant seeks to recover the value of his truck which was destroyed.

In its Answer, respondent admits liability in the amount of $2,475.00, which amount is the fair market value for claimant’s property.

In view of the foregoing, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award to claimant in the amount of $2,475.00.

Award of $2,475.00.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2274 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2274

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide for the compensation of Federal employees affected by lapses 
                           in appropriations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Employee Fair Treatment Act 
of 2017''.

SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES AFFECTED BY A LAPSE IN 
              APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 1341 of title 31, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``An officer'' and 
        inserting ``Except as specified in this subchapter or any other 
        provision of law, an officer''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c)(1) In this subsection--
            ``(A) the term `covered lapse in appropriations' means any 
        lapse in appropriations that begins on or after December 22, 
        2017; and
            ``(B) the term `excepted employee' means an excepted 
        employee or an employee performing emergency work, as such 
        terms are defined by the Office of Personnel Management.
    ``(2) Each Federal employee furloughed as a result of a covered 
lapse in appropriations shall be paid for the period of the lapse in 
appropriations, and each excepted employee who is required to perform 
work during a covered lapse in appropriations shall be paid for such 
work, at the employee's standard rate of pay, at the earliest date 
possible after the lapse in appropriations ends, regardless of 
scheduled pay dates.
    ``(3) During a covered lapse in appropriations, each excepted 
employee who is required to perform work shall be entitled to use leave 
under chapter 63 of title 5, or any other applicable law governing the 
use of leave by the excepted employee, for which compensation shall be 
paid at the earliest date possible after the lapse in appropriations 
ends, regardless of scheduled pay dates.''.

            Passed the Senate December 21, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2274

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To provide for the compensation of Federal employees affected by lapses 
                           in appropriations.
```
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 16, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1357

Lower Tribunal No. 17-5089

________________

La Fe Nursery & Landscaping, Inc.,

Appellant,

vs.

HSBC Bank USA National Association, etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael A. 

Hanzman, Judge.

Albert D. Rey, P.A., and Albert D. Rey, for appellant.

Ballaga, Freedman & Atkins, LLP, and Leonard C. Atkins IV, for 

appellee.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q  of  CollaGenex
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned,  Brian M. Gallagher,  Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and Nancy C. Broadbent,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  CollaGenex  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.  and will be  retained by
CollaGenex  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc. and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



                                    /s/ Brian M. Gallagher, Ph.D.
                                    -----------------------------------------
Dated: November 14, 2003            Brian M. Gallagher, Ph.D.
                                    Chief Executive Officer


                                    /s/ Nancy C. Broadbent
                                    -----------------------------------------
Dated: November 14, 2003            Nancy C. Broadbent
                                    Chief Financial Officer