alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2049 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2049

 To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 to increase support for 
 conservation practices under the emergency conservation program, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 1, 2017

   Mr. Moran introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 to increase support for 
 conservation practices under the emergency conservation program, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENTS FOR EMERGENCY CONSERVATION PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 is amended by 
inserting after section 403 (16 U.S.C. 2203) the following:

``SEC. 403A. PAYMENTS FOR EMERGENCY CONSERVATION PROGRAM.

    ``The maximum cost-share payment under section 701.127 of title 7, 
Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations), shall be equal 
to the maximum amount under section 701.226(b) of title 7, Code of 
Federal Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment of this 
section).''.
    (b) Administration.--Until the date on which any regulations 
necessary to carry out section 403A of the Agricultural Credit Act of 
1978 (as added by subsection (a)) are fully implemented, the Secretary 
shall continue to carry out sections 401, 402, and 403 of that Act (16 
U.S.C. 2201, 2202, 2203) in the same manner as on the day before the 
date of enactment of this Act, except that payments made under those 
sections shall be consistent with section 403A of that Act (as added by 
subsection (a)).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
23.1
 
 
 
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report on the consolidated
financial statements of ADDvantage Technologies Group, Inc. (“the Company”) as
of September 30, 2008 and 2007, and for each of the three years ended September
30, 2008, dated December 17, 2008, included in this Form 10-K Annual Report of
the Company into its previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File
Number 333-110645).
 
 
 /s/ HOGAN
& SLOVACEK
 
 
 December
17, 2008
 Tulsa,
Oklahoma
### OFFICIALNOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS OFTEXAS 

## OFFICIAL BUSINESS a

— --•-•• ^ STATE OF TEXAS_ •|3W PENALTY FOR * PRIVATE USE 

### % 2-fli.' tsS*^ CTJssE3srrsanp 

### 2g w.r.BiTwmy PJTNEV BOWES 02 1M- $ 00.265 00042 79596 MAR 20 2015 

# sr^Si^^?i*4^^^is due in ,his courton Monday, August 31, 2015. Abe, AC0Sta, Clerk

'US; > -ami cv noenu M07FF .'H'(rV!,gvvi-.r .,-..

1*1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           5,419
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,474
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     45,333
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          10,346
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            56,222
<LOANS>                                         78,169
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,246
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 145,973
<DEPOSITS>                                     124,063
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,546
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                559
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,829
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,063
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 145,973
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,087
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,503
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   140
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,730
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,532
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,555
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,175
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       54
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  10
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,899
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,865
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,865
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,410
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .77
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
      23.2




CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
      FIRM






We
        consent to the incorporation of our report dated December 22, 2005, except
        for
        Note 2 and Note 11 as to which the date is December 5, 2007, on the
        financial statements of ADDvantage Technologies Group, Inc. as of September
        30,
        2005, and for each of the two years in the period ended September 30, 2005,
        included in this Form 10-K/A Annual Report of ADDvantage Technologies Group,
        Inc., into ADDvantage Technologies Group, Inc.’s previously filed
        Registration Statement on Form S-8 (file number 333-110645).
EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of MedImmune, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-28481 and 333-28527) and
Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-44195 and 333-13373), of our report, dated February 4,
1998, on our audits of the financial statements of MedImmune, Inc.
as of December 31, 1996 and 1997, and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1997, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.




Coopers & Lybrand L. L. P.


McLean, Virginia
March 27, 1998
1 Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:14 AM

To: 'ctaylor@vikinguas.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Pearson, La kisha (FAA); Cooper, Thuy (FAA) Subject: Request for Information: Viking Unmanned Ae rial Systems Inc.- Ag ricultural Aerial

Services Divisions

January 22, 2015

Mr. Christopher M. Taylor Viking Unmanned Aerial Systems Inc.- Ag ricultural Aerial Services Divisions 16 Sanford Drive, Suite 5 Gorhan, Maine 04038

Dear Mr. Taylor:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-0850). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make and model for the prop osed UAS operation. The description should include
the size.

 Provide information regarding the radio frequency spect rum(s). This information can be located in the
aircraft manual.

 Provide description of proximity to airports.

 Your petition references a pre-flight inspection and/or checklist. Desc ribe the process used to determine if the UAS is airworthy and in sa fe condition for operation in the NAS.

 Your petition references the materials listed below, however the materials were not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o Flight Manual

o SOP

o Manual and Safety Checklist

o Operating Handbook

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to nia.daniels@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the in formation described above by February 6, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.2 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-7626.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108
Federal Aviation Administration
Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PROFESSIONALS GROUP, INC. AS OF JUNE 30,
2000 AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED (IN THOUSANDS).
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           730,863
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       3,015
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    2,690
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 777,338
<CASH>                                           4,774
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               6,076
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           4,390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,110,920
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                663,832
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             93,270
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  27,874
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           10,094
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 14,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,918
<OTHER-SE>                                     214,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,110,920
<PREMIUMS>                                     112,585
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             22,759
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 152
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   2,457
<BENEFITS>                                     103,906
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            22,748
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,133
<INCOME-TAX>                                       520
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,644
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,644
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.84
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 631,981
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            109,042
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (5,336)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              25,030
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                68,155
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                663,832
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
exv10w3






EXHIBIT 10.3




     On October 21, 2008, the Compensation Committee of Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. (the “Company”)
recommended and the Board of Directors of the Company approved the adoption and payment of an
annual retainer to the Chairman of the Board of Directors in the amount of $50,000, which is to be
paid in addition to all other Board and Committee fees paid to the Chairman.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-Q AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,802,253
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               57,258,782<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,622,300
<INVENTORY>                                114,822,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           179,143,625
<PP&E>                                       8,709,344
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,230,174
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             215,902,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      100,146,814
<BONDS>                                     21,485,150<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,202
<OTHER-SE>                                  93,186,451
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               215,902,082
<SALES>                                    165,883,534
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           174,477,546
<CGS>                                      122,712,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              122,712,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,331,261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             18,494,511
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,212,859
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         11,281,652
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,281,652
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.22
<FN>
<F1>Net of allowances for doubtful accounts and sales returns of $5,896,398
<F2>Comprised of long-term debt
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
A. APPLICANT INFORMATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) Not A Consortium Community Now Receives EAS subsidy Community (or Consortium member) prevoiusly received a Small Community Grant If previous recepient: Date of Grant Expiration Date of Grant: N/A
B. PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (LIST ORGANIZATION NAMES): PRIVATE 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 C. PROJECT PROPOSAL (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)

D. EXISTING LANDING AIDS AT LOCAL AIRPORT:

Regional Air Service Enhancement (RAISE) Intrastate Consortium

PUBLIC Interstate Consortium Federal Funds Requested: Carrier(s) Service Obtained: Destination(s) Served: N/A

Start-Up Cost Offset Secure Additional Service Marketing Travel Bank Surface Transportation Launch New Carrier
Published Instrument Approach All applicants must

submit this information with their proposal, along with a completed Form SF424 on www.grants.gov SUMMARY INFORMATION 

### SMALL COMMUNITY AIR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PROGAM

DOCKET DOT-OST-2012-0069

Full ILS Outer/Middle Marker New Route Subsidy Revenue Guarantee First Service Other (explain below) Study Upgrade Aircraft Service Restoration Regional Service

Localizer OtherE. PROJECT COST (DO NOT ENTER TEXT INTO SHADED AREA):

F. IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS**

G.

H. LINE TOTAL SUBTOTAL DESCRIPTION 1 Federal Amount Requested 2,000,000 $ 3a. Airport cash funds 275,000 $ 3b. Non-airport cash funds 1,200,000 $ 2 State cash financial contribution - $ Local cash financial contribution In-Kind Contribution 5a. Airport in-kind contribution** 125,000 $ 3 TOTAL CASH FUNDS (3a+3b) 1,475,000 $ 4 TOTAL CASH FUNDING (1+2+3) 3,475,000 $ 6 TOTAL PROJECT COST (4+5) 

## 3,600,000 $ 5b. Other in-kind contribution** - $ 5 TOTAL IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION (5a+5b) 125,000 $ For funds in lines 5a (airport in-kind contribution) and 5b (other in-kind contribution), please describe the source(s) of fund(s) for each: Airport in-kind contribution is from waived landing fees and terminal fees. IS THIS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE UNDER EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS?
IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT? (IF "YES", THEN PROVIDE EXPLANATION) c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372 No Yes (please explain below) a. This application was made available to the state under Executive Order 12372 Process review on (date):

______________ b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372, but has not been selected by the state for review
#### POTEET v. STATE.

No. 16769.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 30, 1934.

Jno. T. Spann, of Crystal City, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for hunting deer at night with an artificial light as denounced by article 902, P. C. 1925; penalty assessed at a fine of $50.

From the brief of the state’s attorney before this court, we take the following:

> “The sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction presents a troublesome question. It shows:

> “Appellant was seen driving his automobile along a public highway at night, in a community where wild deer were known to range; another party was in the ear with him; the barrel of a gun or rifle was sticking out of a window of the ear, and appellant was holding a flash-light in his hand, shining it out the window.

> “These facts were seen by the State’s witness as he was driving his car back of, and following, that of the appellant. He attempted to pass the appellant and vvas finally successful when he stopped appellant. A search of the car then showed that only the appellant was therein, and no gun or flash-light was found.

> “It is significant to note that no shots were fired and that neither the car nor the occupants left the public highway.

> “.In the ease of Laney v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 56 S.W.(2d) 191, where the facts were held sufficient, these facts were shown.

> “While the term ‘hunting’ has no special significance or definition in this statute, and therefore, is to be taken in its general acceptation, yet, at any and all events, it occurs to me that this would raise nothing more than a circumstance; and, in this case, appellant excepted to the charge for failing to charge on circumstantial evidence.”

Upon the present record, the conclusion of the state’s attorney is adopted as expressing the views of the court, with the following statement pertaining to the Laney Case, supra, cited by state’s counsel in his brief: The state’s evidence was to the effect that Laney, with two companions, at about midnight, *269while hunting along the road in a car with a spotlight which was flashed into the pastures bordering the road as the car in which said parties were slowly propelled, and while so engaged fired several shots from rifles into the pastures where the spotlight was projected, and in which deer were plentiful.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
#### SWIFT et al. v. CALLAGHAN LAND & PASTORAL CO.

No. 10564.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Oct. 12, 1938.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 26, 1938.

J. E. Whitmore and Ira Butler, .both of Fort . Worth, for appellants.

Mann & Mann, of Laredo, for appellee.

SMITH, Chief Justice.

The appeal in this case was ordered dismissed by this Court at a recent session, upon the ground that the order from which the attempted appeal was taken was a temporary restraining order, as distinguished from a temporary injunction, and the right of appeal does not lie thereto. Lark v. Coyle, Tex.Civ.App., 260 S.W. 1107; Berry v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 79 S.W.2d 891. We adhere to that holding and overrule appellants’ motion for rehearing thereon. '

 There is another reason for dismissing the appeal. The restraining order in question is made returnable, and expires by its own terms, on November 1, 1938. As it cannot be finally disposed of in this Court in an orderly manner, after submission- and before said date, the principal question will become moot before decided and the courts may not concern themselves with moot questions.

Motion denied.
**CERTIFICATIONS**





**Certificate
      Pursuant to**





18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Phlo Corporation and Subsidiaries (the
      "Company") the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2006
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, James B. Hovis, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      February 23, 2007




*/s/
              James B. Hovis**James B. Hovis**Chief Executive
              Officer**Principal Financial
              Officer*
#### Henry Earl DUNLAP, Petitioner, v. The WARDEN, United States Penitentiary, McNeil Island, Washington, Respondent.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 12, 1940.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and MATLIEWS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the petition for leave to file an appeal in forma pauperis in the above-entitled cause, it is ordered that said petition be, and hereby is, denied, as the appeal is without merit. 28 U.S.C. A. § 832.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with this Quarterly Report of UnionBanCal Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David I. Matson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Dated:
August 14, 2009

By:

/s/ DAVID I. MATSON David I. Matson Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks