alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.18 to Biodrain Medical, Inc. Form S-1



Exhibit 10.18 


CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 699 Minnetonka Highlands Lane


	
 

	
 Orono, MN 55356-9728








	
 

	
 


	
                    $1,000.00

	
January 30, 2007     





          FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned,
“BioDrain Medical, Inc.,” a Minnesota company (“Maker”), hereby promises to pay to the order of Thomas J.
McGoldrick (“Payee”), at the
address of Payee specified below, the principal sum of one thousand dollars
($1, 000.00), in lawful money of the United States of America, together with
interest thereon, at the rate set forth below.


          1.
The principal of and interest upon this Note
shall be due and payable as follows:


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
(a)

	
This Note
 shall bear interest at a per annum rate of interest of 8.25% based upon a
 year of 365 days and actual days elapsed.


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
(b)

	
The entire
 unpaid principal balance of this Note and accrued interest hereunder shall be
 due and payable in full no later than July 31, 2007, the Maturity Date







	
 

	
 


	
 

	
2. Convertibility terms: The debenture is
convertible to BioDrain common stock at $1.00 per share. On price at next sale
which ever is lower.





          The
undersigned may at any time prepay all or any portion of the principal or
interest owing hereunder.



          Maker hereby waives presentment, demand, notice of
dishonor, protest, notice of protest and all other demands, protests and
notices in connection with the execution, delivery, performance, collection and
enforcement of this Note. Payee shall have full recourse against the
undersigned, and shall not be required to proceed against the assets of the
Maker in the event of default. Maker shall pay all costs of collection when
incurred, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses.


          This
Note is being delivered in, is intended to be performed in, shall be construed
and interpreted in accordance with, and be governed by the internal laws of,
the State of Minnesota, without regard to principles of conflict of laws.


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
BIODRAIN MEDICAL, INC.

	
 

	
Thomas J.
 McGoldrick


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
By:

	


	
 

	



	
 

	 

	
 

	 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Title:

	
CFO

	
 

	
19575 W.
 Chimo

 Wayzata, MN 55391
EXHIBIT 31.2I, Michael O. Aldridge, certify that:   1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of PetroQuest Energy, Inc.;   2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;   4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and   5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Michael O. Aldridge
CH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0414

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ANDREW JAMES McCURDY, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including February 21, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve the 

State’s response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 16 2024

01/16/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0414
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Drinks Americas Holdings, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Fabio Berkowicz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Fabio Berkowicz                                     August 15, 2005
-----------------------
Fabio Berkowicz,
Chief Financial Officer
#### HOLLAND v. BAILEY et al.

No. 1766—7142.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section B.

May 3, 1939.

*447Kilgore & Rogers, of Wichita Falls, and J. S. Wheless, of Kerrville, for plaintiff in error.

Will Morriss, Sr., and Morriss & Mor-riss, all of San Antonio, and W. C. Baker, of Kerrville, for defendants in error.

SMEDLEY, Commissioner.

This cause originated in the filing by Mrs. Effie Holland, guardian of the person of Marguerite Hersey, a person of unsound mind, of an application for the complete removal of the guardianship from Kerr County, where the guardianship proceedings were pending, to Wichita County, it being alleged in the application that the ward, both by the acts of the guardian of the person and by her own acts, had become a bona fide resident of Wichita County. Removal of the guardianship was sought in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 47, Acts Regular Session, 43d Legislature (Article 4295a, Vernon’s Annotated Texas Civil Statutes). The application was contested by defendants in erorr, and after trial before a jury in district court, to which the cause was appealed from the county court, judgment was rendered denying the application. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment of the district court. 93 S.W. 2d 810.

Defendants in error have filed a motion to dismiss the cause, alleging that the cause has become moot since the granting of the application for writ of error. The facts set out in the motion and supported by affidavits are that plaintiff in error, Mrs. Effie Holland, on April 10, 1937, married R. S. Howell, a resident of Bexar County, and thereupon changed her place of residence from Wichita County to Bexar County, and continuously resided in Bexar County until she died there on May 29, 1937; and that Mrs. Howell took the ward, Marguerite Hersey, from Wichita County to Bexar County in April, 1937, from which time the ward has remained and yet remains in Bexar County. Answer filed by the attorneys for plaintiff in error to the motion to dismiss does not controvert the foregoing facts. The only contention made in the answer is that in the event of dismissal costs incident to the appeal should be taxed against defendants in error because the assignments in the application for writ of error are well taken.

It is apparent that the cause, the application for the removal of the guardianship proceedings to Wichita County, has become moot. This being true, the questions presented by the assignments of error have become abstract and will not be decided for the purpose of ascertaining liability for costs. Lacoste v. Duffy, 49 Tex. 767, 30 Am.Rep. 122; Ledbetter v. Ledbetter, Tex.Civ.App., 229 S.W. 576.

The judgments of the Court of Civil Appeals and the trial courts are set aside and the cause is dismissed. Costs in this court, the Court of Civil Appeals and the trial courts are taxed against plaintiff in error.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
NO. 07-03-0240-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

SEPTEMBER 3, 2003

______________________________

XCEL ENERGY, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT,

Appellant

v.

SHERRI LEE HOLLIS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 50,756-C; HON. PATRICK A. PIRTLE, PRESIDING 

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Xcel Energy, by and through their attorneys, have filed a motion to

dismiss this appeal because they longer desire to prosecute it. Without passing on the

merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 42.1(a)(2) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s

request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Brian Quinn

 Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10K
12/31/99 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10K
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000874384
<NAME> CAMBRIDGE NEUROSCIENCE INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,333
<SECURITIES>                                     6,489
<RECEIVABLES>                                      171
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,484
<PP&E>                                             285
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              753
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,769
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,443
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,744)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,744)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,744)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Drinks Americas Holdings, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jeffery Daub, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1. the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Jeffery Daub
              August
      13, 2009Jeffery
      Daub,Chief
      Financial Officer
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation of our report dated December 1, 2000 on the
financial statements of ADDvantage Technologies Group, Inc. as of September 30,
2000 and for the year ended September 30, 2000 and the nine months ended
September 30, 1999 included in this Form 10-KSB Annual Report of ADDvantage
Technologies Group, Inc. as of September 30, 2000, into ADDvantage Technologies
Group, Inc.'s previously Filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No.
333-12641).


/S/ TULLIUS TAYLOR SARTAIN & SARTAIN LLP
TULLIUS TAYLOR SARTAIN & SARTAIN LLP

December 28, 2000
December
23, 2004
 
 To:
 
 PLM
Equipment Growth Fund VI, LP
 
 LETTER OF
INTENT
 
 
 To Whom
It May Concern:
 
 PLM
International, Inc. is pleased to confirm and acknowledge a firm commitment to
sell miscellaneous manufacturing equipment to PLM Equipment Growth Fund VI, LP
on or before June 30, 2005. The total price is $1,055,000.00 including
acquisition and lease negotiation fees.
 
 
 
 SELLER:
 
 PLM
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation
 
 By:  ________________________________
 Name:  ________________________________
 Its:  ________________________________
 
 Address:  c/o 200
Nyala Farms
 Westport,
CT 06880
|   | **EXHIBIT 32.2** |
|--------|------------------|

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trimol Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

 

 
|   | /s/ Jack Braverman |  
 

Jack Braverman

 
 

Chief Financial Officer

 
 

TRIMOL GROUP, INC.

 

 

 

August 19, 2005

 

23

  |
|--------|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                       ROSS SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         SUBSIDIARY                                            PLACE OF INCORPORATION
         ----------                                            ----------------------
<S>                                                            <C>
 1. Cardinal Data Corporation                                  Massachusetts, USA
 2. Ross Systems (U.K.) Ltd.                                   United Kingdom
 3. RossData Canada Limited                                    Canada
 4. Ross Computer Software B.V.                                The Netherlands
 5. Ross Systems Nederland B.V.                                The Netherlands
 6. Ross Systems Europe N.V.                                   Belgium
 7. Pioneer Software, Inc.                                     California, USA
 8. Ross Systems Deutschland GmbH                              Germany
 9. Ross Systems Iberica                                       Spain
10. Bizware Corporation                                        New Jersey, USA
11. Ross Software International PTE, Ltd.                      Singapore
12. Ross Software International (HK), Ltd.                     Hong Kong
13. Ross Systems Canadian Holdings, Inc.                       Delaware
14. Hi Point Systems Corporation                               Ontario, Canada
15. Resynt, Inc.                                               Delaware, USA
16. Ross Systems Auckland Limited.                             New Zealand
</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2003 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G.
William Ruhl, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m(a)
or § 78o(d));
and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ G. William Ruhl

Name:   G. William Ruhl
|Title:    Chief Executive Officer           
|Date:    August 12, 2003                    

1



---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2003 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas
E. Morell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m(a)
or § 78o(d));
and

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Thomas E. Morell

Name:   Thomas E. Morell
|Title:    Chief Financial Officer             
|Date:    August 12, 2003                      

2
EX-10.4










Exhibit 10.4




AMENDMENT TO THE

2007 PERFORMANCE SHARE AWARD AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”) to the 2007 Performance Share Award Agreement (the
“Agreement”), is made effective as of the ___day of ____________, 2008, between Aspen Insurance
Holdings Limited, a Bermuda corporation (the “Company”), and ____________(the “Participant”):



RECITALS:




     WHEREAS, the Company has adopted the Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited 2003 Share Incentive
Plan, as amended from time to time (the “Plan”), which Plan is incorporated herein by reference and
made a part of this Amendment. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same
meanings as in the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Committee has determined that it would be in the best interests of the
Participant to amend the Agreement to comply with Section 409A of the Code, and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder.



     NOW THEREFORE, the Agreement is amended as follows:



     Section 3(b) is restated in its entirety as follows:



     "(b) Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, vested Performance Shares shall be paid to the
Participant as soon as practicable after the date such Performance Shares become vested, but in no
event later than the fifteenth (15th) day of the third (3rd) month following the end of the fiscal
year in which the Performance Shares become vested.”



     Except as expressly amended herein, the provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.



     This Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same
effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	INSURANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED

 	 
	 	By:  	_____________________________
 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 







	 	 	 	 	 
	 	AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED AS

OF THE DATE FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN:

 	 
	 	  	_____________________________
 	 
	 	 	Participant