NO. 07-0 6-04 69-CR 07-0 6-04 70-CR IN THE CO UR T OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL A AU GU ST 13, 2007

_________

_________

_________

___ W ALT ER EARL HARRELL , APPE LLA NT

V. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, APPEL LEE

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 12 1 DIS T RI CT COU RT OF T ER RY COU NT Y; ST NO . 425 2, 49 83; H ON ORABLE KELLY G. M OOR E, J UD GE

_________

_________

_________

____ Bef ore CAMPBE LL a nd HANCOCK an d PIRT LE, JJ. ME MO RA ND UM OPI NI ON Appel lan t, W alt er

Ear l Har re ll , s eeks to appeal orders reco upi ng co urt app oin ted attor ney fees and cour

t cos ts from appel lan t’ s inmat e tr ustfund acc ount. W e find that the orders b ein g appeal ed are non- appeal abl e orders a nd di smi ss for w ant o f jur is dic ti on. On A ug ust19, 1997, appel lan t w as conv ic ted a nd pl aced on c ommunit y su per v is ion for pos ses si on w it h i ntentto del iv er a c ontroll ed s ubst ance, c o ca ine
. On Febr uar y 22, 2000, appel lan t’ s c ommunit y su per v is ion w as re v oked and app ell ant w as sent enced to 102

y ears con f inem ent in the In stitutio nal Div ision of t he T exas Dep artm entof Cri min al Justice and order ed to pay

$200 in attor ney

fees. On J uly 9, 2003, appel lan t ple d g uil ty to the o ff ense of poss ess ion of a c ontroll ed subs tanc e, c ocai ne. Appel lan t w as sent enced to 18 y ears c onfinement in the I nst it uti onal Div ision of

the T exas Departm ento f C riminal Just ice and ordered to pay $248 in court cos ts and $30 0 i n att or ney fees. On O cto ber

27, 2006, the t ri al cour t s ig ned tw o w it hdr aw al o rd e rs noti fyi ng the Dep artment that appel lan t had been ass ess ed cour t cos ts and at tor ney

fees t otal ing $200 in the first caus e and $548 doll ars in the seco nd cause. The tw o w it hdr aw al orders t o the Tex as Dep artment of Cr imi nal Justi ce ord er ed th e D epar tment to w it hdr aw

money from t he tr usta c c o u n to f a p p e l l a n ti n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h s e c t i o n 5 0 1
. 0 1 4 o f t h e T e x a s G o v e r n me nt Cod e. On N ov ember

18, 2006, appel lan t fil ed not ic e of ap peal in each cas e c omplai nin g of the Oc tober

27 w it hdraw al order
. On N ov ember 27, appel lan t fil ed, i n the tri al cour t, th a M oti on to R esc ind Order req uest ing the tr ial co urt t o r e sc in d i ts w it hdr aw al order
. On Febr uar y 20, 2007, appel lan t re q uest ed a pr eparati on of t he cl er k’ s re cord r eq uest ing document s o f the or ig ina l proceed ing s i ncl udi ng the ple a ag re ements , j udg ments of gu il t, and tria l d o cket s heets , as w ell as the re por ter ’s r ecord of the ple a and sent enci ng proceed ing s. Appel lan t al so re q uest ed all pl eadi ng s, document s, and t ra nsc ri pti on of any hear ing r ele v ant t o the co urt’ s w it hdr aw al ord e rs. T h e t rial co urt deni ed th e M oti on to Res ci nd and the req uestfor p re parati on of the re cord. Si nce appel lan t w as not a ppeal ingOn Apr il 9, appel lan t fil ed a moti on for re cords in thi s c ause re quest ing thatthe 1 cl er k’ s record be prov ide d to him. O n Apri l 30, appel lan t f il ed hi s b ri ef w it h thi s c our t. On July 9, he f iled an oth er mo tion for the clerk’s records seeking tha t w e orde r the trial court to prod uce th e clerk’s record s. Appe llant also f iled a m otion for app ellee’s brief ; howev er, t h e S t a t e d id n o tf il e a b ri e f in t h is m a t t e r. Ha v i n g f o u n d t h a tt h is co u rtd o e s n o th a ve jur is dic ti on, w e do not h av e the pow er to acton a ppel lan t’ s motion s before this court . See Ol iv o v . St ate, 918 S. W
. 2d 519 , 52 3 ( Tex
. Cr i m . App. 19 96)
.
3 the j udg ment or

se ntenc e, t he tr ial co urt hel d tha t app ell ant was n o t ent it led to a free re cord of those proc eedi ng s. The tr ial co urt furt her st ated that no hear ing w as hel d on the w it hdr aw al orders a nd, t her efore, no repor ter ’s r ecord ex is ts re g ardin g the w it hdr aw al orde r. W e hav e found no aut hor it y g iv ing us j ur is dic ti on to r ev iew a w it hdr aw al order

i ss ued under se cti on 501.014( e) of

the Tex as Gov er nment Code. See Gro ss v . St ate, No. 07- 06- 048 9-CR, 2007 W L 20 893 65, at *2 (Te x .Ap p.–Am arillo July 23, 20 07, no pe t. h.). 1 Therefor e, w e c oncl ude t hat w e mustdi smi ss the appeal for w ant o f jur is dic ti on.
Mackey K. Hancock Justice Do not p ubl is h.