alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Abatement Order filed November 3, 2014. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00600-CV

____________

IN RE LARRY TAYLOR, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS STATE 

SENATOR FOR DISTRICT 11, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

212th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 14CV0395

ABATEMENT ORDER

On July 24, 2014, relator Larry Taylor, in his official capacity as State 

Senator for District 11, filed a petition for writ of mandamus, asking this court to 

compel the Honorable Bret Griffin, presiding judge of the 212th District Court of 

Galveston County, to vacate an order that denied relator’s motion to quash a 
2

deposition subpoena and subpoena duces tecum or for a protective order, and that 

granted a motion to compel the deposition of relator.

On October 29, 2014, relator filed a letter informing this court that the 

parties in the underlying litigation have reached a settlement agreement in 

principle, but that the settlement has not yet been finalized. Relator further writes 

that the real party in interest has represented that in the event settlement of the 

underlying litigation is finalized, the real party in interest no longer will pursue the 

challenged discovery. 

Based on the foregoing representations, we order this original proceeding 

abated pending the outcome of the efforts by the parties to the underlying litigation 

to finalize the settlement. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits 

of relator’s petition, we abate this original proceeding, treat it as a closed case, and 

remove it from the court’s active docket. This court will consider an appropriate 

motion filed by either party to dismiss or reinstate this original proceeding, 

including a motion for temporary relief, as appropriate. 

We further direct relator to advise this court of the status of the settlement 

discussions in the underlying litigation every thirty (30) days from the date of this 

order until this original proceeding is reinstated or dismissed. 

It is so ORDERED. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2082 

To terminate the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 6, 2017 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To terminate the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Visa Lottery Repeal 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT VISA 

7 PROGRAM. 

8 (a) REPEAL.—Section 203 of the Immigration and 

9 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153) is amended by striking 

10 subsection (c). 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2082 IS

1 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

2 Title II of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

3 1151 et seq.) is amended— 

4 (1) in section 201— 

5 (A) in subsection (a)— 

6 (i) in paragraph (1), by adding ‘‘and’’ 

7 at the end; 

8 (ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘; 

9 and’’ and inserting a period; and 

10 (iii) by striking paragraph (3); and 

11 (B) by striking subsection (e); 

12 (2) in section 203— 

13 (A) by striking subsection (c); 

14 (B) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘sub15 section (a), (b), or (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub16 section (a) or (b)’’; 

17 (C) in subsection (e)— 

18 (i) by striking paragraph (2); and 

19 (ii) by redesignating paragraph (3) as 

20 paragraph (2); 

21 (D) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘sub22 section (a), (b), or (c) of this section’’ and in23 serting ‘‘subsection (a) or (b)’’; 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2082 IS

1 (E) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘sub2 sections (a), (b), and (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub3 sections (a) and (b)’’; and 

4 (F) in subsection (h)(2)(B), by striking 

5 ‘‘subsection (a), (b), or (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub6 section (a) or (b)’’; and 

7 (3) in section 204— 

8 (A) in subsection (a)(1), by striking sub9 paragraph (I); 

10 (B) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘sub11 section (a), (b), or (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub12 section (a) or (b)’’; and 

13 (C) in subsection (l)(2)(B), by striking 

14 ‘‘section 203 (a) or (d)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub15 section (a) or (d) of section 203’’. 

16 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

17 The amendments made by section 2 shall take effect 

18 on the first day of the first fiscal year beginning on or 

19 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

**DUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC.**

 

# **I,Peter S. Kirlin, Chief Executive Officer of DuPont Photomasks, Inc. (the“Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C.**Section 1350 as adoptedpursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection withthe accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the fiscalquarter ended March 31, 2003 and filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission, do hereby certify that to my knowledge:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company in respect of those items required to be described or presented insuch Report under Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934.

 

 
| /s/ PETER S. KIRLIN     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Peter S. Kirlin         |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
| **May 8, 2003**         |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to DuPont Photomasks, Inc. and will be retained by DuPontPhotomasks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

 

# **I,Satish Rishi, Chief Financial Officer of DuPont Photomasks, Inc. (the“Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C.**Section 1350 as adoptedpursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection withthe accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the fiscalquarter ended March 31, 2003 and filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission, do hereby certify that to my knowledge:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company in respect of those items required to be described or presented insuch Report under Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934.

 

 
| /s/ SATISH RISHI        |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Satish Rishi            |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |
| **May 8, 2003**         |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to DuPont Photomasks, Inc. and will be retained by DuPontPhotomasks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT NO. 11.1



STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



|                                          |  |                              |  |                   |     
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ----
|                                          |  | Year Ended December 31, 2003
|                                          |  | Shares                       |  | Earnings PerShare
|                                          |  | (In Thousands)              
|Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |  | 1,119,409                    |  | $                 | 3.08
|                                          |  |                             
|Diluted                                   |  |                              |  |                   |     
|Average Shares Outstanding                |  | 1,119,409                    |  | $                 | 3.08
|Common Stock Equivalents                  |  |                              |  |                   |     
|                                          | 
|                                          |  | Year Ended December 31, 2002
|Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |  | 1,119,409                    |  | $                 | 2.76
|                                          |  |                             
|Diluted                                   |  |                              |  |                   |     
|Average Shares Outstanding                |  | 1,119,409                    |  | $                 | 2.76
|Common Stock Equivalents                  |  |                              |  |                   |
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


   
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-92350) pertaining to the Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors
and the 1990 Restated Stock Option Plan of InControl, Inc. of our report dated
January 29, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
InControl, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended
December 31, 1997.



                                                          /s/  Ernst & Young LLP


Seattle, Washington
July 1, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                           6,852
<SECURITIES>                                    12,434
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,294
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,107
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               142,058
<PP&E>                                          26,555
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,318
<BONDS>                                          2,281
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,703
<OTHER-SE>                                     180,224
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   247,384
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,478
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,093
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,454)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,342
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,796)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,796)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### SOUND MARINE & MACHINE CORPORATION v. WESTCHESTER COUNTY.

No. 368.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 29, 1940.

William A. Davidson, Co. Atty., of White Plains, N. Y. (Frank J. Clay don, Deputy Co. Atty., of White Plains, N. Y., of counsel), for appellant.

James H. Hickey, of New York City, for appellee.

Before SWAN, CHASE, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The libel seeks damages resulting from the laying of a sewer pipe that impaired access by water to the libelant’s land. On a prior appeal this court sustained the admiralty jurisdiction of the District Court and remanded the cause for determination of the question whether the sewer pipe was laid in accordance with the permit issued by the War Department. Sound Marine & Machine Corp. v. Westchester County, 2 Cir., 100 F.2d 360, certiorari denied, 306 U.S. 642, 59 S.Ct. 582, 83 L.Ed. 1042. The permit, dated October 2, 1929, authorized the respondent “to lay a sewer pipe in a trench * * * in accordance with the plans shown on the drawings attached hereto * * Upon the evidence presented at a hearing held pursuant to our mandate the District Court found as a fact that the sewer, pipe was not laid in accordance with the permit, and granted the libel-ant an interlocutory decree from which the present appeal was taken.

This appeal presents a very narrow issue. Adhering, as we do, to our prior decision as to the law the sole question is whether Judge Clancy’s finding of fact is sustainable. The evidence supports it. Much of the sewer was laid on piles capped by timbers upon which the pipe rested. Evidence is lacking of any excavation before the piles were driven. There was a failure of proof that the sewer was laid “in a trench” as the permit required.

Decree affirmed.
**MEMORANDUM**

**DATE:** 3/02 /2015 **FROM:** Angela Hackel; OAR **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR – 2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Docketing o f Materials **SUMMARY :**  In a call held on 2/26/2015, EPA discussed the upcoming Clean Power Plan with community stakeholders. **ATTENDEES:** The attached spreadsheet lists the attendees that participated in the call. In addition to those listed the following EPA staff from the Office of Air and Radiation were present on the call:

- Janet McCabe - Kevin Culligan - Holly Wilson - Angela Hackel - Erika Wilson - Andrea Drinkard
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-126-000]

Take notice that on November 30, 2000, K N Wattenberg Transmission Limited Liability Co., (KNW) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to become effective January 1, 2001:

Third Revised Sheet No. 6

Pursuant to the Commission's Order issued September 19, 2000 in Docket No. RP00-313-000, KNW submits a proposed tariff sheet reflecting the required changes to the Gas Research Institute (GRI) surcharges in its tariff.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-31432  Filed 12-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Trimol Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods covered in the Report. /s/ Yuri Benenson

Yuri Benenson
Chief Executive Officer
TRIMOL GROUP, INC.  November 12, 2004 21
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer of NOVT Corporation (the Company), each hereby certify that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                              
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2006 |  | /s/ JOHN QUICKE                                              
|                   |  | John Quicke, Chief Executive Officer of NOVT
Corporation     
|                   | 
|Date: May 11, 2006 |  | /s/ SUBHASH C. SARDA                                         
|                   |  | Subhash C. Sarda, Chief Financial Officer of NOVT
Corporation

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to NOVT Corporation and will be retained by NOVT Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-QSB and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as part of the Form 10-QSB.
Exhibit 10.23.1

AMENDMENT

This amendment, effective on the last date of signature modifies and amends the Co-Promotion Agreement dated effective November 26, 1997 (the
"AGREEMENT"), by and between Abbott Laboratories through its Ross Products Division, ("ABBOTT") and MedImmune, Inc. ("MEDIMMUNE").

WITNESSETH

WHEREAS, MEDIMMUNE and ABBOTT entered into a Co-Promotion Agreement dated effective November 26, 1997 in order to co-promote the
PRODUCT in the TERRITORY;

WHEREAS,
MEDIMMUNE and ABBOTT now desire to amend the AGREEMENT in order to provide special consideration for Synagis sales ("Amendment");

NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and of the mutual covenants and agreements herein set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:



|% Royalty                          |  | Threshold                         
|---------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|(CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED) |  | (CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED)
|(CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED) |  | (CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED)
|(CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED) |  | (CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED)
|(CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED) |  | (CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED)
|(CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED) |  | (CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED)

This
Amendment and the AGREEMENT sets forth the entire agreement and understanding between the parties as to the subject matter thereof and supersedes all prior agreements and
understandings in this respect. There shall be no amendments or modifications to this Amendment or the AGREEMENT, except by a written document which is signed by both parties.

---

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have each caused this Amendment to be signed and delivered by its duly authorized officer or representative as indicated below.

|MEDIMMUNE, INC. |                                     | ABBOTT LABORATORIES
|--------------- | ----------------------------------- | -------------------
|Name:           | /s/MELVIN D. BOOTHMelvin D. Booth   |                    
|Title:          | President & Chief Operating Officer |                    
|Date:           | July 28, 2000                       |                    

---

QuickLinks
Case 4:22-cr-00341-Y Document 35 Filed 11/30/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 41
Case 4:22-cr-00341-Y Document 35 Filed 11/30/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 42