alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2).

T he H onor abl e A l i c e m a r i e S t ot l e r , S e ni orU ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJ udge ** * f orthe C e ntr a l D i s tr i c tof C a l i f orni a , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M I CH A EL W EBB, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. D. K. S I S T O, Wa r d e n ; E DMUN D G . B R O W N , J r ., R esp o n d en t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 17003 D. C . No . 2 : 0 7 - c v - 0 1 8 7 9 - F C DDA D ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia F r a nk C . D a m r e l l , S e ni orU ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d J une 16, 2010 ** S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: S C H R O E D E R and B Y B E E , C i rc ui tJudg es , and S T O T L E R , D i stri ct Judg e. *** 

# FI LED JU N 18 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

P e titio n e rM ic h a e l W e b b ap p e a ls th e o r d e ro f th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d e n y in g h is pe t i t i on f oraw r i tof

habe a s c orpus . W e bb c onc e de s tha the f i l e d hi s not i c e of appeal thi rty- on e day s a ft erthe di stri ctcourtent er ed j ud gm ent . A no t i ce of appeal i n ac i vi l c a s e “ m us tbe f i l e d w i th the di s tr i c tc l e rk w i thi n 30 da y s a f t e rthe j u d g m e n to ro r d e rap p e a l e d f r o m i s e n t e r e d . ” F e d R . Ap p . P . 4 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A) . “ An appe a l f r om ade ni a l of

habe a s pe t i t i on i s c ons i de r e d a‘ c i vi l ’ m a tt e ra nd i s thus s ubj e c tt o the t i m e l i m i t a t i ons s e tf orth i n rul e 4( a ) ” of

the F e de r a l R ul e s of A p p e lla te P r o c e d u r e . M a lo n e v . A v e n e n ti , 8 5 0 F .2 d 5 6 9 , 5 7 1 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 8 ) . R u le 4 ( a ) “is b o th m a n d a to rya n d ju r is d ic tio n a l” b e c au s e “C o n g r e s s . . . s p e c if ic a lly l i m i t ed ou r j uri sdi ct i on t o h ear c i vi l appeal s a t28 U . S . C . § 2 10 7(a) , w hi ch codi fi es the sam e t i m e c on stra i nt s on the fi l i ng of ci vi l appeal s . . . thatexi sti n R ul e 4(a ). ” U ni ted States v. Sa dl er , 4 8 0 F .3 d 9 3 2 , 9 3 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) ( e m p h a s is r e m o v e d ) . W e “ m ustdi sm i ss ci vi l appeal s thatar e unt i m el y f or l ac k o f j uri sdi ct i on . . . . ” I d. DI S MI S S E D.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2009-7114 

 JUAN J. PEREZ-BURGOS, 

Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

Kenneth M. Carpenter, Carpenter, Chartered, of Topeka, Kansas, argued for 

claimant-appellant. 

L. Misha Preheim, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, 

United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondentappellee. With him on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. 

Davidson, Director, and Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Assistant Director. Of counsel on the 

brief were Michael J. Timinski, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and Jamie L. 

Mueller, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans 

Affairs, of Washington, DC. 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 

Judge Alan G. Lance, Sr. 

 

 

 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2009-7114 

JUAN J. PEREZ-BURGOS, 

 Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 

 Respondent-Appellee. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 

in CASE NO(S). 07-0173 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE and BRYSON, Circuit Judges). 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED May 4, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
     <LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
Titanium Metals  Corporation's  Consolidated  Financial Statements for the three
months  ended March 31, 2000 and is  qualified  in its  entirety by reference to
such Consolidated Financial Statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                   0001011657
<NAME>                  Titanium Metals Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000
<CURRENCY>              U.S. Dollars

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              Mar-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                                                      6,304
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               79,450
<ALLOWANCES>                                                3,270
<INVENTORY>                                                 186,044
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            291,445
<PP&E>                                                      411,882
<DEPRECIATION>                                              88,788
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              818,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       143,094
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       201,250
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                    348,299
<OTHER-SE>                                                  42,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                818,765
<SALES>                                                     104,712
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            107,188
<CGS>                                                       108,011
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               108,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          2,262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (18,126)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                (6,384)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (14,248)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             (873)
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (15,121)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (0.48)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Drinks Americas Holdings, Ltd (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Patrick Kenny, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ J. Patrick Kenny                                            August 11, 2006
--------------------
J. Patrick Kenny,
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the Company's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         10,896
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  154,761
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    354,683
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               551,778
<PP&E>                                         78,329
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 720,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          289,027
<BONDS>                                        164,208
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       15
<OTHER-SE>                                     256,697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   720,861
<SALES>                                        357,247
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               357,247
<CGS>                                          271,789
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  271,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             17,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                27,208
<INCOME-TAX>                                   10,638
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            16,570
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   17,421
<EPS-BASIC>                                  1.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.32


</TABLE>
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2245 

AN ACT 

To include New Zealand in the list of foreign states whose 

nationals are eligible for admission into the United 

States as E–1 and E–2 nonimmigrants if United States 

nationals are treated similarly by the Government of 

New Zealand. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2245 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Knowledgeable 

3 Innovators and Worthy Investors Act’’ or the ‘‘KIWI 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT TRADERS AND INVESTORS. 

6 For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii) of section 

7 101(a)(15)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)), New Zealand shall be considered 

9 to be a foreign state described in such section if the Gov10 ernment of New Zealand provides similar nonimmigrant 

11 status to nationals of the United States. 

Passed the Senate June 28, 2018. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2245 

AN ACT 

To include New Zealand in the list of foreign states 

similarly by the Government of New Zealand. immigrants if United States nationals are treated the United States as E–1 and E–2 nonwhose nationals are eligible for admission into
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2292 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2292

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil and gas 
  preleasing, leasing, and related activities in certain areas of the 
    Outer Continental Shelf off the coast of Florida, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 10, 2018

  Mr. Nelson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil and gas 
  preleasing, leasing, and related activities in certain areas of the 
    Outer Continental Shelf off the coast of Florida, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Florida Coastal Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRELEASING, LEASING, AND 
              RELATED ACTIVITIES IN CERTAIN AREAS OFF THE COAST OF 
              FLORIDA.

    Section 18 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 
1344) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Prohibition of Oil and Natural Gas Preleasing, Leasing, and 
Related Activities in Certain Areas Off the Coast of Florida.--
            ``(1) Prohibition.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        this section or any other law, the Secretary may not offer for 
        oil and gas preleasing or leasing, or any related activity, any 
        tract located in--
                    ``(A) any area of the Eastern Gulf of Mexico that 
                is referred to in section 104(a) of the Gulf of Mexico 
                Energy Security Act of 2006 (43 U.S.C. 1331 note);
                    ``(B) the portion of the South Atlantic Planning 
                Area south of 30 degrees, 43 minutes North Latitude; or
                    ``(C) the Straits of Florida Planning Area.
            ``(2) Limitation on effect.--Nothing in this subsection 
        affects any right under any lease issued under this Act before 
        the date of enactment of this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### BROWN v. STATE.

No. 15693.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 15, 1933.

Rehearing Denied April 26, 1933.

John L. Poulter, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*160MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft, a misdemeanor, is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the county jail for a period of twenty days.

The offense is sufficiently charged in the complaint and information. The trial was had before a jury. No statement of facts or bills of exception accompany the record.

There is a motion for new trial but in the absence of the statement of facts, the complaint of the rulings of the court cannot be appraised.

Finding no error presented for review, the judgment is affirmed.

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

We are unable to agree with appellant’s contention that the complaint is defective. The essential ingredients of theft are sufficiently alleged.

The complaint begins: “Before the undersigned authority this day personally appeared this affiant, who, after being by me duly sworn,” etc. The complaint is signed “Oscar Hukill, Affiant.” It is sworn to before the proper officer, and attested by a sufficient jurat. The fact that the affiant’s name was not given in the body of the complaint did not render it defective. If the complaint is signed by the affiant and sworn to by him, his name need not appear in the body of the complaint. Branch’s Annotated Penal Code, § 479; Upton v. State, 33 Tex. Cr. R. 231, 26 S. W. 197; Utsler v. State, 81 Tex. Cr. R. 501, 195 S. W. 855.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeal's and approved by the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                            7,198
<SECURITIES>                     61,142
<RECEIVABLES>                    19,103
<ALLOWANCES>                        160
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 89,451
<PP&E>                          141,886
<DEPRECIATION>                   27,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  206,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            35,898
<BONDS>                          17,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                          3,984
<OTHER-SE>                      148,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    206,612
<SALES>                          78,532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                121,008
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    71,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  2,189
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                2,143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  52,147
<INCOME-TAX>                     21,044
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              31,103
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     31,103
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      1.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                      1.96
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 238 (Monday, December 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 77355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31424]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-117-000]

El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

December 5, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 28, 2000, El Paso Natural Gas Company 
(El Paso) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, the 
following tariff sheets, to become effective January 1, 2001:

Second Revised Volume No. 1-A

Nineteenth Revised Sheet No. 20
Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 22
Nineteenth Revised Sheet No. 23
Twenty-Third Revised Sheet No. 24
Nineteenth Revised Sheet No. 26
Nineteenth Revised Sheet No. 27
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 37
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 38

Third Revised Volume No. 2

Forty-Eighth Revised Sheet No. 1-D.2
Forty-Second Revised Sheet No. 1-D.3

    El Paso states that the above tariff sheets are being filed to 
adjust its rates for inflation.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-31424 Filed 12-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### TILLMAN v. STATE.

No. 16007.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 10, 1933.

E. H. Talbert, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State. »

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is under article 902, P. C. (1925), which makes it an offense to hunt deer by the aid of a headlight or hunting lamp, punishment being a fine of $50.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                  STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, each of the undersigned certifies
that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of SS&C Technologies, Inc.

Date: August 13, 2002                            By: /s/ William C. Stone

                                                 William C. Stone
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 13, 2002                            By: /s/ Patrick J. Pedonti

                                                 Patrick J. Pedonti
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
#### SAPP v. STATE.

No. 15806.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 8, 1933.

McLemore & Ivy, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is robbery; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.