alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

NOVEMBER 26, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-12571

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00039-CR-OC-10-GRJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

AMILCAR BARROS-GOMEZ, 

a.k.a. Toty, 

a.k.a. El Negrito, 

a.k.a. Carlos Palmar, 

a.k.a. Robert Higius, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(November 26, 2007)

Before BIRCH, DUBINA and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
2

PER CURIAM:

David Mengers, appointed counsel for Amilcar Barros-Gomez, has filed a

motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the record confirms counsel’s assessment of the relative merits of any

potential issues for appeal. Because the record reveals no issues of arguable merit,

we GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM Barros-Gomez’s

conviction and sentence.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2050 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2050

 To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to provide to producers partial 
 payments under the livestock indemnity program for livestock sold for 
                                salvage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 1, 2017

   Mr. Moran introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to provide to producers partial 
 payments under the livestock indemnity program for livestock sold for 
                                salvage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIVESTOCK INDEMNITY PAYMENTS FOR LIVESTOCK SOLD FOR SALVAGE.

    Section 1501(b) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 9081(b)) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph 
        (A), by inserting ``sold livestock for a reduced sale price in 
        excess of the normal mortality, or both,'' after 
        ``mortality,'';
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``on the day before the 
        date of death of the livestock, as determined by the 
        Secretary.'' and inserting the following: ``, as determined by 
        the Secretary on, as applicable--
                    ``(A) the day before the date of death of the 
                livestock; or
                    ``(B) the day before the date of sale of the 
                livestock.''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Payment reductions.--A payment made under paragraph 
        (1) to an eligible producer on a farm that sold livestock for a 
        reduced sale price in excess of the normal mortality shall be 
        reduced by the amount that the producer received for the 
        sale.''.
                                 <all>
```
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Corrine Augustine Hill Shearer and Sam Hill, Appellant s

No. 06

- 12

- 00096

- CV v.
David Shearer, Independent Administrator of the Estate of John William Shearer III, Deceased, Appellee Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2010

- 0265

- P

- 1 ). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the trial court ’ s award of exemplary damages against

Corrine and Sam for conversion. We reverse and remand the trial court ’ s award of exemplary damages against Sam for breach of fiduciary duty and remand the case for a review of that exemplary damage award in light of the reduced actual damages. In all other respects, we affirm

the trial court ’ s judgment. We further order that the appellants and appellee shall each pay one half of all costs of appeal.
RENDERED JULY 16, 2013 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                              160,528
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       113,227
<ALLOWANCES>                         (9,000)
<INVENTORY>                         205,478
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    470,233
<PP&E>                               16,814
<DEPRECIATION>                       (4,499)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      485,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               539,233
<BONDS>                             201,917
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                              3,431
<OTHER-SE>                         (258,853)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        485,728
<SALES>                             208,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    208,607
<CGS>                                85,732
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       540,595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    5,536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (423,256)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (423,256)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                       (423,256)
<EPS-BASIC>                            (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.01)



</TABLE>
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Randall, Appellant.

(No. 28666

Decided June 11, 1941.)

*Mr. William A. Ambrose,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Harold H. Hull,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Hahn & Schumam,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the *437reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.

Matthias, J., not participating.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2096 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2096

To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to prohibit payments of premium 
                  subsidy for harvest price policies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 8, 2017

Mr. Flake (for himself and Mrs. Shaheen) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to prohibit payments of premium 
                  subsidy for harvest price policies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Harvest Price Subsidy Prohibition 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PREMIUM SUBSIDY FOR HARVEST PRICE POLICIES.

    Section 508(e) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1508(e)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) Prohibition on premium subsidy for harvest price 
        policies.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
        beginning with the 2018 reinsurance year, the Corporation shall 
        not pay any amount of premium subsidy in the case of a policy 
        or plan of insurance that is based on the actual market price 
        of an agricultural commodity on the date of harvest.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
  Form S-3  No. 33-71574  of  Sport Supply Group, Inc.  and  in the  related
  Prospectus  and in the Registration  Statements on Form S-8  No. 33-42056,
  33-48514,  33-80028,  333-27191,  333-27193,  and  333-36314 of our report
  dated  November 20, 2000,  except  for  Note 3  as to  which  the  date is
  December 27, 2000,  with respect to  the consolidated financial statements
  of Sport  Supply Group, Inc. included in this Form 10-K for the year ended
  September 29, 2000.


                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

  Dallas, Texas
  December 27, 2000
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

RITA MARIE EICHMAN

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT
FROM RETIRED STATUS :

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 152 DB 201 9 (No. 87 RST 2019)

Attorney Registration No. 58446

( Philadelphia County )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21 st day of October

, 201 9 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated October 11

, 2019

, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Rita Marie Eichman

, who has been on Retired Status

, has never been suspended or

disbarred, and has demonstrated that s he has the moral qualifications, competency and

learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is,

hereby reinstated to active status as a member of th e Bar of this Commonwealth. The

expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall

be paid by the Petitioner.
#### LASSITER v. STATE.

No. 19903.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 15, 1938.

Reid & Stovall, of Canton, for appellant.

Lewis Orsborn, Co.'Atty., of Canton, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is assault with intent to murder; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for seven years.

On the 7th of February, 1937, C. D. Johnson, a constable, had received a warrant of arrest for the appellant. When he attempted to arrest appellant he seized a shotgun and shot the officer several times. The wounds were serious, and necessitated the removal of Mr. Johnson to the hospital where he remained for two weeks under the care of a physician.

Appellant did not testify.

No bills of exception are brought forward.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the, Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Medivation, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 14, 2007



|       |  |                                      
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/ David T. Hung, M.D.              
|Name:  |  | David T. Hung, M.D.                  
|Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from AirNet
Systems,  Inc.'s  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q for the  three  months  ended
December  31,  1996  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       9,541,003
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,200,145
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,150
<INVENTORY>                                  5,012,284
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,412,906
<PP&E>                                      88,523,667
<DEPRECIATION>                              42,950,045
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              78,790,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,975,330
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       124,751
<OTHER-SE>                                  70,293,203
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                78,790,346
<SALES>                                        366,432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,758,930
<CGS>                                          309,352
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,966,846
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,571,617
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,220,467
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,688,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,532,467
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,532,467
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 64 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 

2010, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2010 (di4 vision B of Public Law 111–68) is further amended by 
2 

•HJ 64 EH 

1 striking the date specified in section 106(3) and inserting 

2 ‘‘December 23, 2009’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 16, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 64 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal 

year 2010, and for other purposes.
Avrum Gross and Annalee McConnell 

Chatham Cannery, Sitkoh Bay, Alaska 

ema1l address: annalee.av@gmafl.com phone: 907-723-5183 

maflfng address: 8991 Yandukfn Drive #1 0, Juneau AK 99801 

August 17, 2012 

Mr. A.J. Muldoon 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Room W86-489 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

... Washington :OC 20590 

Dear Mr. Muldoon: 

We are residents of Chatham, Alaska. We are writing to support Ward Air's application to 

continue as the federally subsidized carrier to deliver essential air service here. 

Ward has been the mail carrier here for many years, and we are grateful for the services they 

provide. We feel very safe flying with them and they are extremely dependable -you can 

practically set a watch by their scheduled arrival and departure times. 

Most important, they are responsive to our particular situation. One example is that there 

used to be many problems with the Post Office returning mail to senders as undeliverable. 

(Apparently new personnel didn't realize Chatham was a reallocation!) Then Ward Air 

suggested using their own address as a mail drop. Now all our mail gets delivered properly. It 

was a creative, sensible solution to the problem. They are always ready to go the extra mile -

to hold a flight, if necessary or to bring much-needed freight even when inconvenient. In 

short, they are sensitive to the needs of people living in remote areas who are critically 

dependent on float plane service. 

Ward Air is a good fit for Chatham. We urge you to continue having them provide ess.ential 

air service here. 

Yours very truly, 

Annalee McConnell 

cc: Ward Air
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCES TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      15,740,583
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  718,367
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,458,950
<PP&E>                                     286,316,571
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,971,271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             320,509,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,702,764
<BONDS>                                    162,284,106
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,725
<OTHER-SE>                                 144,756,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               320,509,528
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            32,546,638
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,403,732
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,241,203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,421,141
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                275,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,146,141
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64
        

</TABLE>
Request for Information FAA-2015-4854 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Lawrence: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. 

FAA-2015-4854). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to

process your petition.

Per the Notice to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 Petitioners Regarding 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, part 107 letter posted to your docket, we have reviewed your original request and found 

you will be able to operate under part 107 without further relief (Tier 1). Your petition will be closed 

and you will be able operate in accordance with part 107 on the effective date of August 29, 2016). 

However, we have identified a request to conduct operations outside of the United States. In addition to 

the applicable regulations of the foreign country, operators of U.S.-registered aircraft will need to seek

relief from the provisions of Part 91, Subpart H of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations to 

conduct operations outside of the United States.

Please confirm your intention to pursue operations outside of the United States as a comment to your

docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your information is submitted, please save your tracking number 

and submit your tracking number along with the information submitted to the docket via e-mail to

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the

information described above by 9/16/16. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket 

without notifying you further.

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 9:23 AM 

To: james.lawrence@uavfms.com

Request for Information FAA-2015-4854 Page 1 of 1

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&... 9/2/2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems                    

*Date and Time:*                         January 24, 2001, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 530, Arlington, Virginia 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Alison Flatau, Program Director, Dynamic Systems and Control, Sensor Technologies for Civil and Mechanical Systems, Room 545, (703) 292-8360.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning Individual Investigator Award proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate nominations for the FY'01 Sensor Technologies for Civil and Mechanical Systems Individual Investigator Award Review Panel proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals.                    

These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

Dated: November 28, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-31488 Filed 12-11-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M