alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          43,335,098
<SECURITIES>                                    22,256,214
<RECEIVABLES>                                       83,910
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,819,084
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,739,908
<PP&E>                                           4,478,194
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,662,321
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,944,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,147,806
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           140,722
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,655,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,944,465
<SALES>                                             83,910
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    80,913
<CGS>                                              175,148
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,280,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 312,597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,061,945)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,061,945)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,061,945)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.72)
                                               


</TABLE>
Memo to the Docket

Docket – EPA-R08-OAR-2011-0114

November 13, 2015
As explained in the “Air Quality Modeling Protocol: Utah Regional Haze Federal Implementation Plan” (November 2015), there are sev eral voluminous data files used for the revised modeling. Such files are available by requ est from EPA by contacting Rebecca Matichuk at matichuk.rebecca@epa.gov.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          29,588                  29,588
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,773                  56,773
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     14,960                  14,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,272                 123,272
<PP&E>                                         658,442                 658,442
<DEPRECIATION>                               (265,661)               (265,661)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 564,052                 564,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,820                  89,820
<BONDS>                                        114,408                 114,408
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           157                     157
<OTHER-SE>                                     302,669                 302,669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   564,052                 564,052
<SALES>                                        234,673                  86,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               234,673                  86,790
<CGS>                                          163,866                  59,339
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  163,866                  59,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,354                  16,234
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,453                  11,217
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,000                   2,765
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,001                   7,112
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,001                   7,112
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.16                    0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12                    0.44


</TABLE>
#### CULVER v. STATE et al.

No. 3248.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

July 3, 1935.

F. W. Fischer, of Tyler, for appellant.

William McCraw, Atty. Gen., and Archie D. Gray and Tom D. Rowell, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellees.

HIGGINS, Justice.

The state of Texas and the Railroad Commission filed this suit December 15, 1934, against George L. Culver, doing business under the name of Linzie Refining Company.

It was alleged that Culver is “engaged in establishing and maintaining an oil business together with storing and transporting oil and gas, and is doing all those things and acts necessary for the operation of the business of a refinery, and in addition thereto, is engaged in producing, storing and transporting crude petroleum.”

It was further alleged that Culver was violating the orders of the commission of February 15, 1933, April 3, 1934, and December 5, 1934. The nature of such orders is stated in the opinion rendered in Tyreco Refining Co. v. State (Tex. Civ. App.) 81 S.W.(2d) 291, to which we refer. Recovery of the statutory penalties for such violations was sought and temporary injunction was prayed.

Upon the allegations of the verified petition, the court temporarily enjoined Culver substantially as follows:

(a) From further purchasing, transporting, or handling crude petroleum oil produced from any property in the East Texas oil field in excess of the amount allowed by the orders, rules, and regulations of the Railroad Commission.

(b) Purchasing, transporting, or handling crude petroleum without complying with- the order of the Railroad Commission of Texas dated February 15, 1933.

(c) From purchasing, handling, transporting, refining, marketing, or processing crude oil without complying with the order of the Railroad Commission of Texas dated April 3, 1934.

(d) From operating the refinery of appellant without making reports required by the order of the Railroad Commission of Texas dated April 3, 1934.

(e) From shipping or causing to be shipped and transported any products of crude petroleum oil from the refinery owned and operated by .the appellant, which product is manufactured and processed in the state of Texas, unless and until appellant has obtained a permit cover*262ing such shipment issued in conformity with the provisions of the order of the Railroad Commission of Texas dated December 5, 1934.

From such order, Culver appeals.

This case is distinguishable from Foshee Refining Company v. State (Tex. Civ. App.) 73 S.W.(2d) 1098, cited by appellant as is pointed out by Chief Justice Johnson in Tyreco Refining Co. v. State, supra. The distinguishing feature is the allegation of the present petition showing that Culver is engaged in producing, storing, and transporting crude petroleum. Under the ruling in the case last cited, the attack made by Culver upon the authority of the court to grant the temporary injunction as ordered is without merit.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Frank W. Getman Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of BayCorp
Holdings, Ltd., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BayCorp Holdings,
Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared.
    b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
    c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
    b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  August 12, 2003         By: /s/ Frank W. Getman Jr.
                                   ---------------------------
                                   Frank W. Getman Jr.
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer
                                   (principal executive officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


By signing below, the undersigned officer hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his or her knowledge, (i) this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Applied
Extrusion Technologies, Inc.

Signed this 22nd day of January, 2003



/s/ Amin J. Khoury
--------------------------------------
Amin J. Khoury
Chairman of the Board and
   Chief Executive Officer
#### UNDERWOOD v. STATE.

No. 15852.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 12, 1933.

Reynolds & Heare, of Shamrock, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*132CALHOUN, Judge.

The offense, murder; punishment, confinement' in penitentiary for 30 years.

No statement of facts accompanies the record. Several special charges appear in the record. It is impossible for this court to determine whether they were applicable in the absence of a statement of facts. There also appears in the record a number of exceptions to the court’s charge. In the absence of a statement of facts, the charge must be held to be sufficient and will not be reviewed if as given it is applicable to any state of facts which might be made by the evidence under the allegations of the indictment. We must assume that the court below submitted to the jury the law of the case and all the law required by the statute or any portion of same. See section 170, 4 Tex. Juris.; Kell v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 31 S.W.(2d) 1079; Smith v. State, 113 Tex. cr. R. 398, 22 S.W.(2d) 460; Davis v. State, 110 Tex. Cr. R. 602, 9 S.W.(2d) 1108.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      12,763,000
<SECURITIES>                                 5,517,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              152,847,000
<ALLOWANCES>                              (11,131,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 17,051,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           232,721,000
<PP&E>                                     416,766,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (65,837,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             950,669,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       77,230,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       640,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 513,968,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               950,669,000
<SALES>                                    671,469,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           671,469,000
<CGS>                                      543,200,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              587,212,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,245,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          24,926,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             58,086,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                20,917,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         37,169,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                37,169,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 (Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) I, Roy T. Rimmer, Jr. as Chief Executive Officer of TIMCO Aviation Services,
Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my
knowledge:  1.
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report), filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Date: May 13, 2004
    
    /s/ Roy T. Rimmer, Jr.Roy T. Rimmer, Jr.Chief Executive Office
 30
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections                           ( print page 76653)                        552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                        National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel ZDK1 GRB-7 J2.                    

*Date:*                        December 21, 2000.                    

*Time:*                        3:00 pm to 4:30 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                        To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                        National Institutes of Health, NIDDK/DEA/Review Branch, 2 Democracy Boulevard, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, MSC 5452, Room #659, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                        Lakshmanan Sankaran, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 659, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, (301) 594-7799.                     

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 28, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-31205  Filed 12-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 09/25 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00066-CR

Shawn Danene Harty, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-13-300338, HONORABLE CLIFFORD A. BROWN, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R AND M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Shawn Danene Harty filed her notice of appeal January 22, 2015, and her brief was

originally due April 6, 2016. Harty’s appointed counsel Harley Martin failed to file the brief after

receiving multiple extensions of time totaling 113 days, after an abatement for the district court’s

determination of whether Martin had abandoned this appeal, after being ordered to file appellant’s

brief no later than November 22, 2016, and after a show cause hearing held February 1, 2017.

The appeal is abated. We remand this cause to the district court with instructions to

appoint new counsel for Harty by February 24, 2017. The district court shall order the appropriate

supplemental clerk’s record to be prepared and filed with this Court no later than March 17, 2017.

See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3).

It is ordered on February 2, 2017.
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Field and Bourland

Abated and Remanded

Filed: February 2, 2017

Do Not Publish

2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

This Additional Exhibit is furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
in accordance with Commission Release No. 33-8212.

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of Interlott Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 4, 2003                        /s/ David F. Nichols
                                         -----------------------------------

                                             David F. Nichols
                                             Chief Executive Officer

                                             /s/ Dennis W. Blazer
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Dennis W. Blazer
                                             Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Interlott Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Interlott
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
EX-10.2




Exhibit
10.2








Mr. Edward M. Liddy

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

American International Group, Inc.












Dear Ed:



As you know, the Board of Directors of the company decided that my termination was “not for cause.”
Accordingly, I am entitled to receive severance payments under the AIG Executive Severance Plan of
approximately $22 million. While I appreciate the Board’s intention to fulfill this obligation, I
have decided, after careful deliberation, to forgo the severance payments.



I will not accept the severance payments for two reasons. First, my three-month tenure as Chief
Executive Officer did not provide the opportunity to execute the restructuring I had developed with
the help of my AIG colleagues. Second, notwithstanding the issues that predated my term at AIG or
the significant disruption in the capital markets which impacted several major financial
institutions, I prefer not to receive severance payments while shareholders and employees have lost
considerable value in their AIG shares.



I wish you, the Board and all of the talented employees at AIG all the best as you continue the
work of restructuring the company and restoring it to profitability.



Sincerely yours,





/s/ Robert B. Willumstad





Robert B. Willumstad