alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

  We consent  to  the  incorporation by  reference  in  the  Registration
  Statement Form S-3 No. 33-71574 of Sport Supply Group, Inc. and in  the
  related Prospectus and in the Registration  Statements on Form S-8  No.
  33-42056, 33-48514, 33-64470, 33-80028, 333-27191, and 333-27193 of our
  report dated  November  5,  1999,  with  respect  to  the  consolidated
  financial statements of Sport Supply Group, Inc. included in this  Form
  10-K for the year ended October 1, 1999.


                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

  Dallas, Texas
  December 27, 1999
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

    I, Peter Boneparth, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Annual Report of Jones Apparel Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained insuch Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Jones Apparel Group, Inc.

By: /s/ Peter Boneparth

Name: Peter Boneparth Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

 

*A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and will be retainedby Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.*

 

    I, Wesley R. Card, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Annual Report of Jones Apparel Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained insuch Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Jones Apparel Group, Inc.

By: /s/ Wesley R. Card

Name: Wesley R. Card Title: Chief Operating and Financial Officer

 

*A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and will be retainedby Jones Apparel Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.*
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RUBIN YOUNG,

Appellant,

v.

DR. BRENDA C. SNIPES, BROWARD COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF 

ELECTION'S CANVASSING BOARD, and MARK BOGEN, candidate,

Appellees.

No. 4D18-2221

[February 14, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Raag Singhal, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 14023676 (21).

Rubin Young, Coral Springs, pro se.

No appearance for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2247 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a consistent eligibility 

date for provision of Department of Veterans Affairs memorial 

headstones and markers for eligible spouses and dependent children of 

veterans whose remains are unavailable, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 19, 2017 

Mr. HELLER (for himself and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a 

consistent eligibility date for provision of Department 

of Veterans Affairs memorial headstones and markers 

for eligible spouses and dependent children of veterans 

whose remains are unavailable, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2247 IS

1 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF VETERANS’ SPOUSES AND DE2 PENDENT CHILDREN WHOSE REMAINS ARE 

3 UNAVAILABLE FOR DEPARTMENT OF VET4 ERANS AFFAIRS MEMORIAL HEADSTONES 

5 AND MARKERS. 

6 Section 2306(b)(2) of title 38, United States Code, 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘The’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘An individual who dies on or after No10 vember 11, 1998, who is the’’; and 

11 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘An’’ and 

12 inserting ‘‘An individual who dies on or after No13 vember 11, 1998, who is an’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
     AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          142333
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   160421
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     263176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                600928
<PP&E>                                           30000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   15973
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2048585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4898180
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     700522
<COMMON>                                          1133
<OTHER-SE>                                   (3945910)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2048585
<SALES>                                         789379
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                789379
<CGS>                                           736955
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1398712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1346288)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1346288)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1346288)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, to which
this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report
and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
 Dated: November 6, 2008/s/ N. Anthony ColesN. Anthony ColesPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Gregory W. SchaferGregory W. SchaferVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

      Each director and/or officer of Retail Ventures, Inc. (the "Corporation")
whose signature appears below hereby appoints John C. Rossler, James A. McGrady
and Julia A. Davis as the undersigned's attorney or any of them individually as
the undersigned's attorney, to sign, in the undersigned's name and behalf and in
any and all capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), the Corporation's Annual
Report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the fiscal year ended January 31,
2004, and likewise to sign and file with the Commission any and all amendments
to the Form 10-K, and the Corporation hereby appoints such persons as its
attorneys-in-fact and each of them as its attorney-in-fact with like authority
to sign and file the Form 10-K and any amendments thereto granting to each
attorney-in-fact full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying
all that any such attorney-in-fact or the undersigned's substitute may do by
virtue hereof.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands effective as of the 1st
day of April, 2004.

<TABLE>
<S>                                               <C>
/s/ Jay L. Schottenstein                          Chairman of the Board of Directors
------------------------------------
Jay L. Schottenstein

/s/ John C. Rossler                               President and Chief Executive Officer
------------------------------------              (Principal Executive Officer)
John C. Rossler

/s/ James A. McGrady                              Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
------------------------------------              Treasurer and Secretary (Principal Financial and
James A. McGrady                                  Accounting Officer)


/s/ Henry L. Aaron                                Director
------------------------------------
Henry L. Aaron

/s/ Ari Deshe                                     Director
------------------------------------
Ari Deshe

/s/ Jon P. Diamond                                Director
------------------------------------
Jon P. Diamond

/s/ Elizabeth M. Eveillard                        Director
------------------------------------
Elizabeth M. Eveillard

/s/ Harvey L. Sonnenberg                          Director
------------------------------------
Harvey L. Sonnenberg

/s/ James L. Weisman                              Director
------------------------------------
James L. Weisman
</TABLE>
#### Goutras, Appellee, *v.*Rheinfrank, Appellant.

(No. 28669

Decided October 1, 1941.)

*Mr. Mark Winchester,*for appellee.

*Mr. Eugene Rheinfrank,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.
#### HALL v. STATE.

No. 15770.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 12, 1933.

Hamilton, Fitzgerald & Grundy, of Memphis, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Driving an automobile while intoxicated is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the county jail for a period of thirty days and a fine of $50.

The record is before us without statement of facts and bills of exception.

Objection was urged to the court’s charge to the jury, paragraph 3 of which contains the following: “You are further instructed that if you find and believe from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, that on or about the 8th day of January, 1932, the defendant, Coy Hall, was intoxicated *or was under the influence of intoxicatmg liquor in any degree,*and while so intoxicated, if he was, he drove or operated a motor vehicle upon a public street, situated within the town of Memphis', an incorporated town situated in Hall County, Texas, then you will find the defendant guilty and assess his punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for any period of time not more than two years, or by confinement in jail for not more than ninety days, or by fine of not more than Five Hundred Dollars, or by both such fine and imprisonment in the County Jail, but if you do not so find and believe beyond a reasonable doubt, you will find the defendant not guilty.”

That part of the charge italicized is made the subject of objection. The use of the words “in some degree under the influence of intoxicating liquor” has been held inadequate to charge an offense.

In the present instance, the words mentioned are not in the indictment, but appear alone in the charge of the court in the connection quoted. Under such circumstances, id has been held that the words “in any degree” may be treated as surplusage. See Williams v. State, 100 Tex. Cr. R. 50, 271 S. W. 628.

In the instant case, the evidence is not before this court, and it must be assumed, in *161the absence of a showing in the record to the contrary, that the evidence adduced upon the trial supported the averment in the indictment, namely, that the appellant was under the influence of intoxicating liquor. See Nunn v. State, 114 Tex. Cr. R. 487, 26 S.W.(2d) 648; Herring v. State, 117 Tex. Cr. R. 211, 35 S.W.(2d) 737; Farmer v. State, 119 Tex. Cr. R. 212, 43 S.W.(2d) 588.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                    22,867
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          1,200,771
<ALLOWANCES>                                             254,000
<INVENTORY>                                              844,057
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       2,644,589
<PP&E>                                                   557,375
<DEPRECIATION>                                           287,595
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         2,945,017
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  5,530,793
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    296,250
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                              54,315,402
<OTHER-SE>                                               (60,511)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           2,945,017
<SALES>                                                3,263,178
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       3,263,178
<CGS>                                                  3,012,410
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          5,325,866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       456,651
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        9,012,481
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    6,241,703
<DISCONTINUED>                                         2,870,778
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                100,000
<NET-INCOME>                                          (9,112,481)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (.67)




</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129802 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129802 COA: 261169 Wayne CC: 99-009800 JERRY L. CUNNINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e September 21, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s0320 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 27, 2006

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of ESB Financial Corporation (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the
Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Charles P. EvanoskiCharles P. EvanoskiGroup Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer


Date: March 13, 2006

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to ESB Financial Corporation and will be retained by ESB Financial Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-127-000]

Take notice that on November 30, 2000, Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC, (KMIGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to become effective January 1, 2001:

Third Revised Sheet No. 4D

Pursuant to the Commission's Order issued September 19, 2000 in Docket No. RP00-313-000, KMIGT submits a proposed tariff sheet reflecting the required changes to the Gas Research Institute (GRI) surcharges in its tariff.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the                           ( print page 77357)                        Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-31433  Filed 12-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
EXHIBIT 11
```

```
                            JONES APPAREL GROUP, INC.
              Computation of Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share
                     (In millions except per share amounts)
```

```

                                         For the Year Ended December 31,
                                        --------------------------------
                                            2000        1999        1998
                                        --------    --------     -------
Basic Earnings per Share:
-------------------------
Net income...........................     $301.9      $188.4      $154.9
                                        ========    ========     =======

Weighted average number of shares
outstanding..........................      119.0       114.1       101.6
                                        ========    ========     =======

Basic earnings per share.............      $2.54       $1.65       $1.52
                                        ========    ========     =======

Diluted Earnings per Share:
---------------------------
Net income...........................     $301.9      $188.4      $154.9
                                        ========    ========     =======

Weighted average number of shares
outstanding..........................      119.0       114.1       101.6

Assumed issuances under exercise
of stock options.....................        2.9         3.9         3.5
                                        --------    --------     -------

                                           121.9       118.0       105.1
                                        ========    ========     =======

Diluted earnings per share...........      $2.48       $1.60       $1.47
                                        ========    ========     =======
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Griffin, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion, pursuant to CPL 440.20 (1), to vacate his sentence as a persistent felony offender. Defendant was convicted in 1960 in Federal District Court of unlawful transportation of a stolen vehicle in interstate commerce (18 USC § 2312) and conspiracy to transport said vehicle (18 USC § 371) and was sentenced to one year and one day on each conviction. Since defendant received a sentence in excess of one year on each of those convictions they were properly considered for persistent felony offender adjudication *(see,*Penal Law § 70.10 [1] [b] [i]). Defendant also was convicted in 1968 in Suffolk County Court of criminal sale and possession of a dangerous drug, each in the second degree, and was sentenced to concurrent indeterminate terms of 5 to 15 years and 2 *Vi*to 7 years, respectively. Thus, defendant was properly adjudicated a persistent felony offender in 1979 *(see,*Penal Law § 70.10 [1] [a]). Defendant’s challenge to the constitutionality of the persistent felony offender statute (Penal Law § 70.10) lacks merit *(see, People v Parker,*41 NY2d 21, 25). In view of our holding, we need not address the additional issue whether the court properly considered defendant’s 1965 conviction for second degree grand larceny on which he was sentenced to 0 to 5 years in a State reformatory. (Appeal from order of Cayuga County Court, Contiguglia, J.—vacate sentence.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Green and Lawton, JJ.