alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10(p)(4)



AMENDMENT FOUR TO MARKETING AGREEMENT





THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE MARKETING AGREEMENT, effective as indicated herein, by and between American National Insurance Company (American National), an insurance company organized under the laws of the state of Texas, and Legacy Marketing Group (LMG), a California corporation.



WHEREAS, American National and LMG entered into a Marketing Agreement, dated November 15, 2002, as amended, (Agreement), wherein LMG agreed to provide specified services relating to the marketing of certain insurance policies issued by American National;



WHEREAS, American National and Legacy desire to amend to the Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and mutual promises hereinafter contained and other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto do agree as follows:



1.

American National acknowledges that LMG receives an asset-based trail commissions on the policies marketed by LMG, pursuant to either its marketing and administrative agreements between the parties.  Effective November 15, 2007, LMG hereby assigns, with American Nationals consent, all American National asset-based trail commissions to Legacy TM, LP.  LMG agrees that American Nationals payment of such asset-based trail commissions to Legacy TM, LP satisfies American Nationals obligations to LMG with respect to such asset-based trail commissions.  American National shall pay such asset-based trail commissions to Legacy TM, LP as long as each such policy generating such asset-based trail commissions remains in force.



All other provisions in the Agreement not specifically amended above remain in effect and unchanged.



IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment.



Legacy Marketing Group

American National Insurance Company



By: /s/ R. Preston Pitts

By: /s/ David Behrens



Printed Name: R. Preston Pitts, President

Printed Name: David Behrens



Title: President

Title: Executive Vice President



Date: October 31, 2007

Date: November 8, 2007









Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CLIFFORD W. JONES, JR.,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D14-0008

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O/B/O SANDRA L. JONES,

Appellee.

/

Opinion filed July 18, 2014

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Sally D. M. Kest, Judge.

Clifford W. Jones, Jr., Spring Hill, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee , and William H. Branch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Appellee's Concession of Error, we reverse the tri al court's December

2, 2013, final order on motion to vacate order, and remand to t he court to make findings

pursuant to Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.615(1)(d) a nd for further

proceedings, if necessary. Trisotto v. Trisotto, 966 So. 2d 98 6 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007 ).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

TORPY, C.J., ORFINGER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,934,761               3,934,761
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,900                  85,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,507                  27,507
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               261,033                 261,033
<PP&E>                                       3,617,395               3,617,395
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,205,734               1,205,734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,409,585              21,409,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,471,795               3,471,795
<BONDS>                                         61,714                  61,714
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,489,670               3,489,670
<COMMON>                                    45,006,948              45,006,948
<OTHER-SE>                                (30,620,542)            (30,620,542)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,409,585              21,409,585
<SALES>                                        192,934                 481,216
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               192,934                 481,216
<CGS>                                          340,084                 541,318
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,662,784               5,350,850
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,878,293)             (5,455,118)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                    (186,719)             (4,391,295)
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,065,012)             (9,846,413)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.52)                  (1.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.52)                  (1.76)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 63 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 63

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   limit the number of years Representatives and Senators may serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 14, 2009

 Mr. Price of Georgia introduced the following joint resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   limit the number of years Representatives and Senators may serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person shall be a Representative for more than 
eighteen years, except that service to fill a vacancy shall not be 
included in determining eligibility.
    ``Section 2. No person shall be a Senator for more than eighteen 
years, except that service to fill a vacancy shall not be included in 
determining eligibility.
    ``Section 3. Only service that begins after the date of 
ratification of this article shall count in determining the number of 
years a Representative or Senator serves.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Everett Ault EVANS v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 1992.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

July 18, 1940.

*936James B. Kelsey, of Leavenworth, Kan., for appellant.

Homer Davis, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Topeka, Kan., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS and BRATTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on court's own motion for failure to prosecute.
APSC Staff 4-18 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 1

**Generating Unit MW**  **In-Service SCR Type**  **Project Cost ($M) (1)** 
AMOS1 800 2004 SCR 140.1 AMOS2 800 2005 SCR 155.3 CONESVILLEV4 780 2009 SCR 45.4 MITCHELL1 800 2007 SCR MITCHELL2 800 2007 SCR MUSKINGUM RIVER5 600 2005 SCR 90.4 STUART1 600 2004 SCR STUART2 600 2004 SCR STUART3 600 2004 SCR STUART4 600 2004 SCR ZIMMER 1,300 2004 SCR 33.4 **Total: 8,280** 

(1). Dollars are total cost including overheads and AFUDC. **AE P's 8,200 MW Installed SCR Controls** 

**Since 2004**

292.4

47.6
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2040 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 314
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2040

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 621 Kansas Avenue in Atchison, Kansas, as the ``Amelia Earhart Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 31, 2017

Mr. Roberts (for himself and Mr. Moran) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           February 15, 2018

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 621 Kansas Avenue in Atchison, Kansas, as the ``Amelia Earhart Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMELIA EARHART POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 621 Kansas Avenue in Atchison, Kansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Amelia Earhart Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Amelia 
Earhart Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 314

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2040

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 621 Kansas Avenue in Atchison, Kansas, as the ``Amelia Earhart Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 15, 2018

                       Reported without amendment
```
Wyoming Nitrate Contribution to Badlands Worst

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total BADL1 2002 plan02c36k PN3 23 WY 0.0766 0.0003522 0.0578565 0.0035609 0.0143044 0.1526739 Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Worst) to Nitrat e at Badlands = 0.15 divided by 1.3, or 12% Best

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total BADL1 2002 plan02c36k PN3 23 WY 0.2871696 0.0004304 0.2081957 0.0137522 0.0643087 0.5738566 Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Best) to Nitrat e at Badlands = 0.57 divided by 1.7, or 34%
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         109,461
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  269,425
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    452,335
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               890,309
<PP&E>                                       2,955,376
<DEPRECIATION>                                 166,998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,729,872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          523,936
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,114
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,277,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,729,872
<SALES>                                      1,154,970
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,154,970
<CGS>                                        1,237,105
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,016,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             100,303
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (861,110)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (861,110)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (861,110)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.77)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION I, Jack
Braverman, certify that: 1.
I have
 reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trimol Group, Inc.2.
Based on my
 knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
 material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
 statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
 were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
 quarterly report;3.
Based on my
 knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
 in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
 financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
 as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
The
 registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
 and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
 Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant, and internal controls over
 financing reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
 and we have:a)
designed
 such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
 relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
 known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
 in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b)
designed and
 evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
 procedures to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
 financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
 purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as of a
 date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
 Evaluation Date); andc)
presented in
 this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
 disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
 Evaluation Date;5.
The
 registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
 most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee
 of registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
 function):a)
all
 significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
 which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
 summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
 auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
any fraud,
 whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
 a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and6.
The
 registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
 report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or
 in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
 to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
 with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  August 13,
 2008
By /s/ Jack
 BravermanChief
 Financial Officer 23
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10.5.1



                Schedule to Form of Severance Benefits Agreement


     Pursuant to Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, this Schedule sets
forth a list of those executive officers of Leap Wireless International, Inc.
who have executed the form of Severance Benefits Agreement filed as Exhibit
10.5.1:


     Glenn P. Umetsu
     Leonard C. Stephens
     David B. Davis
#### SMITH v. STATE.

No. 17220.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 13, 1935.

Sam H. Townsend, of Lufkin, for appellant.

Lloydi W. Davidson, State’s Átty., of Austin, for the State.

' HAWKINS, Judge;

Appellant was convicted for manufacturing intoxicating liquor; punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The count in the indictment upon which appellant was convicted charged that in Angelina county he “did then and there unlawfully manufacture intoxicating liquor.” Under the holding in Offield v. State. (Tex. Cr. *128App.) 75 S.W.(2d) 882, the indictment fails to charge an offense. The reasons fully appear in the discussion of the question in the Offield Case. See, also, Haynie v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 76 S.W.(2d) 133, Oliver v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 76 S.W.(2d) 134; Byrd v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 76 S.W.(2d) 134.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed under the present indictment.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, to which
this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report
and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
  /s/ N. Anthony ColesN. Anthony ColesPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Matthew K. FustMatthew K. FustExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T F E RN A N D O A R R E O L A - S O T O and MAR I A D E L C AR ME N A R R E OL A, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 71616 A ge nc yN os . A 095- 443- 719

A 095- 443- 720 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y19, 2010 ** B efo re: B . F L E T C H E R , R E IN H A R D T , an dW A R D L A W , C i rcu i tJu d g es. F e rnando A rr e ol a - S ot o and M ar i aD e l C arm e n A rr e ol a , na t i ve s and c i t i z e ns of M exi co, pet i t i on for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order d e n y in g th e irm o tio n to r e o p e n . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e 

# FI LED JU L 30 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 71616 2 r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , Can o-Mer i da v. I NS , 3 1 1 F .3 d9 6 0 , 9 6 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) , an dw e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to re op en because the B IA consi dere d the evi dence of C ar ol e’ s e m ot i on aldi ff i cul t i es and act ed w i thi n i t s broad di sc re t i on i n d et erm i ni ng thatthe evi dence w as in s u f f ic ie n t to e s tab lis h p r im af a c ie e lig ib ilityf

o rc an c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l. See S i n gh v . I

NS , 2 9 5 F .3 d1 0 3 7 , 1 0 3 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) ( B I A ’s d e n ia l o f am o tio n to re op en shal l be re vers ed on l y i f i ti s “ arbi trary , i rr at i on al , or contraryt o l aw ”) . T he B I A di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng the m ot i on ba s e d on e v id e n c e o f

N ic o le ’s h yp e rtr o p h ic to n s il c o n d itio n b e c au s e p e titio n e r s f a ile dto d e m o n s tr a te th a t th is e v id e n c e w a s p r e v io u s lyu n a v a ilab le . See 8 C. F. R. § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ; R om er o-R uiz v . Mukasey , 5 3 8 F .3 d1 0 5 7 , 1 0 6 3 - 6 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . P et i t i on er s’ cont ent i on s thatthe B IA appl i ed an i ncorrec thardshi p st andard and f a i l e d t o c ons i de rr e l e vanthar ds hi p f a c t or s ar e nots upport e d bythe r e c or d. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Trimol Group, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that: (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the periods covered in the Report. No
purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely
upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The undersigned expressly
disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as
required by law. /s/ Jack
 BravermanJack
 BravermanChief
 Financial OfficerTRIMOL
 GROUP, INC. August 13,
2008 [A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Trimol Group, Inc.
and will be retained by Trimol Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.] 25
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00241

- CR

Gerry Don Rudolph

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From The County Court

o f Young County (35480 )

July 24, 20 14

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgmen t of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Sue Walker

____________________ Justice Sue Walker