alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1366 

To protect innocent parties from certain fees imposed by depository 

institutions for dishonored checks, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2009 

Mr. WEINER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To protect innocent parties from certain fees imposed by 

depository institutions for dishonored checks, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Innocent Check De5 positor Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CERTAIN CHECK DISHONORMENT FEES PROHIB7 ITED. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 607 of the Expedited 

9 Funds Availability Act (12 U.S.C. 4006) (relating to misVerDate Nov 24 2008 02:06 Mar 07, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1366.IH H1366

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1366 IH

1 cellaneous provisions) is amended by adding at the end 

2 the following new subsection: 

3 ‘‘(f) FEES ON DISHONORED CHECKS.— 

4 ‘‘(1) RECEIVING DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION.—In 

5 the case of a check drawn on an account at an origi6 nating institution which is dishonored by the origi7 nating institution due to the lack of sufficient funds 

8 in such account to pay the check, a receiving deposi9 tory institution may not impose any fee on the de10 positor, in connection with such check, due to such 

11 dishonorment. 

12 ‘‘(2) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—No provision 

13 of this section shall be construed as affecting any in14 tervening depository institution or the costs of the 

15 services provided by such depository institution.’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 this section shall apply after the end of the 180-day period 

18 beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit 99.2
         Written Statement of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
                Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Jeffersonville Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies to his knowledge on the date hereof, that:

    1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                        /s/ John M. Riley
                                        John M. Riley
                                        Treasurer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Jeffersonville Bancorp and will be retained by Jeffersonville
Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
optimizerx_s1-ex1001.htm


    EXHIBIT
10.1

     

     

     

     

     

    AGREEMENT

     

    CONCERNING THE EXCHANGE OF
SECURITIES

     

    BY AND AMONG

     

    RFID, LTD.,

     

    OPTIMIZERX CORPORATION

     

    AND

     

    THE SECURITY HOLDERS OF OPTIMIZERX
CORPORATION
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0337 Directorate ID : 2010 - SW - 090 - AD Helicopter Model: Bell Hel icopter Textron Canada L imited Model 407 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 552 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions required by this proposed AD are intended to prevent an over - torque of a tailboom - attachment bolt , bolt failure, loss of the tailboom, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 

### 498 Labor per Helicopter ( 2 x $ 8 5 /work- hour for hardware replacement) (1 x $85/work- hour to determine recurring torque value) $ 170 $85 Other (Explain) This estimated total cost assumes attachment hardware will be replaced on all affected helicopters, the torque will be considered stabilized after determining the torque value once, and the 300 - ho ur TIS recurring torque determination will be accomplished twice a year. Total Cost per Helicopter $ 923 (first year) Total US Fleet Cost $ 

### 509 , 496 (first year) Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a sign ificant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : 

### Sharon Miles
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                       TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP INC.
                      COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
            THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND 1995

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED               NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                            SEPTEMBER 30,                     SEPTEMBER 30,
                                     ----------------------------  ---------------------------------
                                         1996           1995           1996               1995
                                     -------------  -------------  -------------  ------------------
 
<S>                                  <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Net Loss                             $(33,704,000)  $(12,672,000)  $(72,139,000)       $(35,917,000)
                                   ================================================================
 
Primary loss per common share:
 
Weighted average number of shares
 outstanding                          158,876,191     70,000,140    100,234,987          70,000,140
                                   ================================================================ 

 
 
Loss per share                       $      (0.21)  $      (0.18)  $      (0.72)       $      (0.51)
                                   ================================================================
 
Fully diluted loss per share:
 
Weighted average number of shares
 outstanding                          158,876,191     70,000,140    100,234,987          70,000,140
                                   ================================================================ 
 
 
Loss per share                       $      (0.21)  $      (0.18)  $      (0.72)       $      (0.51)
                                   ================================================================
 
</TABLE>
Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is
entered into as of October 31, 2008, by and between COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY, an Oregon corporation (“Borrower”), and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (“Bank”). 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, Borrower is
currently indebted to Bank pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Credit Agreement between Borrower and Bank dated as of December 16, 2004, as amended from time to time (“Credit Agreement”). 
 WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower have agreed to certain changes in the terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement and have agreed to amend the
Credit Agreement to reflect said changes. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree that the Credit Agreement shall be amended as follows: 
 1. The definition of “Maturity
Date” set forth in Section 1.1 of Article I of the Credit Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following substituted therefor: 
 “‘Maturity Date’ means July 1, 2010.” 
 2. Except as specifically provided
herein, all terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement remain in full force and effect, without waiver or modification. All terms defined in the Credit Agreement shall have the same meaning when used in this Amendment. This Amendment and the
Credit Agreement shall be read together, as one document. 
 3. Borrower hereby remakes all representations and warranties contained in the
Credit Agreement and reaffirms all covenants set forth therein. Borrower further certifies that as of the date of this Amendment there exists no Event of Default as defined in the Credit Agreement, nor any condition, act or event which with the
giving of notice or the passage of time or both would constitute any such Event of Default. 
 UNDER OREGON LAW, MOST AGREEMENTS, PROMISES AND
COMMITMENTS MADE BY BANK CONCERNING LOANS AND OTHER CREDIT EXTENSIONS WHICH ARE NOT FOR PERSONAL, FAMILY OR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES OR SECURED SOLELY BY THE BORROWER’S RESIDENCE MUST BE IN WRITING, EXPRESS CONSIDERATION AND BE SIGNED BY BANK TO BE
ENFORCEABLE. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year
first written above. 
  

									
	COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY	 		 	WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
				
	/s/ BRYAN L. TIMM	 		 	By:	 	/s/ JAMES L. FRANZEN
	Bryan L. Timm	 		 		 	James L. Franzen, Vice President
	Chief Financial Officer
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Form REP-702

Rev. 0, 4/2012

Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 8/5/2013

Sample Number: 133007-001 Date Collected: 07/23/2013 08:00 Date Received: 7/24/2013

1st Stage Feed 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Selenium, Se 213 ug/L 0.50 0.20 DPC 07/31/2013 13:07 EPA 200.8

Sample Number: 133007-002 Date Collected: 07/23/2013 08:00 Date Received: 7/24/2013

2nd Stage Feed 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Selenium, Se 16.3 ug/L 0.50 0.20 DPC 07/31/2013 13:11 EPA 200.8

Sample Number: 133007-003 Date Collected: 07/23/2013 08:00 Date Received: 7/24/2013

Bioreactor Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Selenium, Se 1.5 ug/L 0.50 0.20 DPC 07/31/2013 13:16 EPA 200.8

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 133007 Page 1 of 1
#### TIPSON v. STATE.

No. 16303.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 13, 1933.

T. A. Scruggs, of Menard, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary, punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record before this court fails to show any judgment of conviction. The record recites a verdict, but, if any judgment was entered thereon, it does not so appear. Furthermore, it fails to show that sentence was ever pronounced against appellant. We find the following recital in the transcript: “4 — 17-33—Defendant sentenced to confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two (2d) years.” This notation is not such a sentence as the law requires.

The appeal is dismissed.
Order entered November 13, 2012

In The 

## Court of Zippeatz fifth 3Distritt of 

## Texao at 313affao

No. 05-12-00565-CV JASON L. GRAMAN & MARTIN GRAMAN, Appellants V. IBP RETAIL NO. 5, LP, Appellee On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199-00508-2010



### ORDER The Court has before it appellee's November 8, 2012 second unopposed motion for extension of time to file its brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellee to file its brief by December 13, 2012. No further extensions will be granted absent a showing of exceptional circumstances. 

### •

MOLLY FRA IS JUSTICE
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 2000** 

In re: ALVITA KAREN GUNN , P etitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
. ( 8 : 0 9

- cr - 00 213

- RWT

- 4; 8:14

- cv - 00167

- RWT )

Submitted : January 22, 2015 Decided: January 26, 2015

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Petition deni ed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Alvita Karen Gunn, Petitioner Pro Se
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Alvita Karen Gunn petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking this court ’s review of her motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) or, alternatively, an order recusing the district court judge. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary cir cumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 517 (4th Cir. 2003). Mandamus may not be us ed as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). We conclude that t he relief sought by Gunn is not available by way of mandamus. Moreover, t o the extent that Gunn argues delay by the district court, our revie w of the district court’s docket reveals that the court has ruled on Gunn’s motion. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus and the motion for bail or release pending appeal. We dispe nse with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1787 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1787

       To reauthorize the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 2017

Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. King) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To reauthorize the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Geologic Mapping Act 
Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING ACT OF 1992.

    (a) Reauthorization.--
            (1) In general.--Section 9(a) of the National Geologic 
        Mapping Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 31h(a)) is amended by striking 
        ``2018'' and inserting ``2023''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 4(b)(1) of the National 
        Geologic Mapping Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 31c(b)(1)) is amended 
        by striking ``Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009'' each 
        place it appears in subparagraphs (A) and (B) and inserting 
        ``National Geologic Mapping Act Reauthorization Act''.
    (b) Geologic Mapping Advisory Committee.--Section 5(a)(3) of the 
National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 31d(a)(3)) is amended 
by striking ``Associate Director for Geology'' and inserting 
``Associate Director for Core Science Systems''.
    (c) Clerical Amendments.--Section 3 of the National Geologic 
Mapping Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 31b) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ``section 6(d)(3)'' and 
        inserting ``section 4(d)(3)'';
            (2) in paragraph (5), by striking ``section 6(d)(1)'' and 
        inserting ``section 4(d)(1)''; and
            (3) in paragraph (9), by striking ``section 6(d)(2)'' and 
        inserting ``section 4(d)(2)''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 61981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24403]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8498]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Ink Art: The Past as Present in Contemporary China''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Ink Art: The Past as Present in 
Contemporary China,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, 
from on or about December 11, 2013, until on or about April 6, 2014, 
and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, 
is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

     Dated: October 2, 2013.
Evan M. Ryan,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-24403 Filed 10-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Exhibit 10.5.4



	
 

	
 


	
Ratification and Extension Agreement

	
 





          THIS Agreement is made and entered into
this 14th day of October, 2008, by and between Millennium Group Worldwide
Incorporated, a Florida corporation with its principal place of business at
2825 N. 10th Street, St. Augustine, Florida 32084 (“MGW”), and
Wandana International Jambo Coffees & Teas, Inc with a principal place of business
at (“Wandana”), 200 Business Circle #106, St. Augustine, FL.32905 and Jax
Roasters, Inc. (“Jax”), located at 200 Business Circle #106, St. Augustine,
FL.32905 (collectively “we, us, the parties or the group hereinafter referred
to as “Wandana”).


          WHEREAS,
MGW have entered into a Shareholders Agreement dated 25th February,
2007 (the “Prior Shareholders Agreement”); 


          WHEREAS,
the Prior Shareholders Agreement (at third WHEREAS paragraph) and the Prior
Amendment (Now Therefore, Paragraph 2) was conditioned upon MGW obtaining
adequate funding under its Form S-1 Registration, such period of time having
already expired as a function of the registration and review process;            


          WHEREAS,
both MGW and Wandana wish to ratify the Prior Shareholders Agreement Amendment
and extend the period that will satisfy the Now Therefore, Paragraph 2
condition as to timing.


          NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
1.

	
MGW and
  Wandana hereby ratify the Prior Shareholders Agreement and Amendments in all
  respects; 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
2.

	
Section, Now
  Therefore, Paragraph 2 of the Amendment relating to timing of funding is
  extended to no later than December 31, 2008, or immediately after the
  appropriate funding is available from the offering; and 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
3.

	
This
  Agreement, together with the Prior Shareholders Agreement and Amendments as
  hereby incorporated by reference, constitutes the entire understanding
  between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and no amendment
  or modification to this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon the parties
  unless made in writing and signed by each party.










IN WITNESS
WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first
written above.


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
MILLENNIUM GROUP WORLD INCORPORATED 



	
 

	
WANDANA INTERNATIONAL JAMBO COFFEES & TEAS, INC.




	
/s/ Julius
  Jackson, Sr

	
 

	
/s/ Simon K.
  Nyagah


	


	
 

	



	
Julius
  Jackson, Sr.- Chairman

	
 

	
Simon K.
  Nyagah, President








	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
JAX ROASTERS, INC.




	
 

	
/s/ Simon
  K. Nyagah 


	
 

	



	
 

	
 

	
Simon K.
  Nyagah, President