alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BAYCORP HOLDINGS, LTD FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,884
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,459
<PP&E>                                         106,944
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,511
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,750
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            84
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,661
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,519
<SALES>                                         17,554
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,554
<CGS>                                           21,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,651
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,243)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,243)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.64)


</TABLE>
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06

- 14

- 00095

- CV

Kevin Cooper Ross

v.

Tiffany McCrary

(No. 1969 IN COUNTY COURT OF FRANKLIN COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

CLERK'S RECORD

SUPREME COURT CHAPTE R 51 FEE

FILING

STATEW IDE EFILING FEE

INDIGENT $21.00 $50.00 $100.00 $20.00 $25.00 UNKNOWN

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID KEVIN C

. ROSS

KEVIN C. ROSS

KEVIN C. ROSS

KEVIN C. ROSS

KEVIN C. ROSS

Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of

the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Sixth Dist rict of Texas, this
June 26, 2015

.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___

________________________ Deputy
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Novoste Corporation (the Company), each hereby
certify that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ ALFRED J. NOVAK                                             
|                     |  |  |  | Alfred J. Novak, Chief Executive Officer of Novoste
Corporation 
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 9, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ SUBHASH C. SARDA                                            
|                     |  |  |  | Subhash C. Sarda, Chief Financial Officer of Novoste
Corporation



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Novoste Corporation and will be retained by Novoste Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as
part of the Form 10-Q.
### Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief, EAS 

### & Domestic Analysis Division Office ofAviation Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590

Re: Tupelo Regional Airport (TUP) Docket DOT-OST -2009-0305

Dear

### Mr. DeVany, 

### IZ

I am writing in support of Silver Airways' proposal to provide commercial air service to the Tupelo Regional Airport. Citizens from (our community) depend onthe Tupelo Regional Airport for their air service. It is very important to our local economy for air service to continue in and out ofTupelo. We believe Silver Airways' interline ticketing andbaggage agreements with DeltaAirlines makethis option very attractive to ourcitizens. 

### In addition the 30 to 50 seat aircraft are much more desirable 

### than the 8 seat aircraft offered by Air Choice One. We are excited about this chance to return to profitabil

### ity. Thank you for considering our citizens in your deliberations. Mayor Kennedy, City ofSmithville. 

# c/tn

Gregg Kennedy, Mayor
EXHIBIT 32.01











CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Spectrum Select L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Walter Davis, President of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



















By:             /s/            Walter Davis





Name:                   Walter Davis


Title:                      President of Demeter Management LLC,


general partner of the registrant





Date:                      March 29, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                Jan-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  Jun-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            610,273
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            26,454
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                              26,949
<EQUITIES>                                      158,836
<MORTGAGE>                                            0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                         0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  795,563
<CASH>                                           59,557
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               25,418
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           23,869
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1,590,079
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 936,243
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             120,340
<POLICY-OTHER>                                        0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                 0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 100,816
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                      300,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1,590,079
<PREMIUMS>                                      161,994
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              26,433
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 (330)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                    6,017
<BENEFITS>                                      109,268
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      45,437
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             14,247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  11,995
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3,793
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               8,582
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      8,582
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                        0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                   0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                     0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                      0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                       0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                               0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          38,170
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               347,523
<PP&E>                                           4,825
<DEPRECIATION>                                     861
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 389,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          291,858
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,798
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   389,657
<SALES>                                         36,967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,967
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,724
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,623
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,975
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,648
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,648
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
        

</TABLE>
*OPINION ISSUED DECEMBER 12, 2008*

#### JASON DONAHUE VS. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

(CC-08-0114)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Andrew F. Tarr, Attorney at Law, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

*169Claimant brought this action for vehicle damage which occurred when his 2008 Mercedes Benz struck a hole while claimant’s wife, Janet Donahue, was driving on the Mileground, designated as U.S. Route 119, in Morgantown, Monongalia County. U.S. Route 119 is a road maintained by respondent. The Court is of the opinion to make an award in this claim for the reasons more folly stated below.

The incident giving rise to this claim occurred between 8:00 a.m. and 8:15 a.m. on March 19,2008. U.S.Route 119 is a three-lane road with twelve foot wide lanes. At the time of the incident, Janet Donahue was driving from the airport towards W.Va. Route 705. As she was driving in rainy conditions at approximately twenty miles per hour, her vehicle struck a hole located near the Monro Muffler shop. She testified that the hole was approximately six inches deep. Since the hole was covered with water, she did not see it before her vehicle struck it. Although Ms. Donahue travels this road on a daily basis, she did not notice the hole on the day prior to this incident. The claimant testified that water drains onto the roadway in the area where this hole formed. As a result of this incident, claimant’s vehicle sustained damage to its passenger front and rear tire in the amount of $342.42. Claimant’s insurance deductible is $1,000.00.

The position of the respondent is that it did not have actual or constructive notice of the condition on Route 119. Kathy W estbrook, Highway Administrator for respondent in Monongalia County, stated that there are approximately 17,000 to 19,000 vehicles that travel on this road each day. Ms. Westbrook did not have any DOT12s, or daily work reports, regarding this particular hole on Route 119. She testified that the hole could have developed within a twenty-four hour period due to the freezing and thawing that can cause deterioration on the roadway.

The well-established principle of law in W est Virginia is that the State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of travelers upon its roads. *Adkins*v. *Sims,*130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). In order to hold respondent liable for road defects of this type, a claimant must prove that respondent had actual or constructive notice of the defect and a reasonable time to take corrective action. *Chapman*v. *Dep't of Highways,*16 Ct. Cl. 103 (1986).

In the instant case, the Court is of the opinion that respondent had, at the least, constructive notice of the hole which claimant’s vehicle struck and that the hole presented a hazard to the traveling public. The size of the hole leads the Court to conclude that respondent had notice of this hazardous condition. Thus, the Court finds respondent negligent and claimant may make a recovery for the damage to his vehicle.

In accordance with the findings of fact and conclusions of law stated herein above, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award to the claimant in the amount of $342.42.

Award of $342.42.
Order entered January 4 , 201 9

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01223
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF I .S., A CHILD On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 469
- 55837
- 2013



### O RDER
Befo re the Court is appellant’s January 2, 2019 motion to abate the appeal

. Appellant seeks the abatement because the trial court has not filed findings of fact and conclusions of law despite a pr oper request under the rules of civil procedure. We GRANT the motion as follows

. We ORDER the Honorable Piper McCraw , Presiding Judge of the 469 th Judicial District Court, to make findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Texas Rule of C ivil Procedure 297 no later than January 23 , 201 9 . The findings of fact and conclusions of law shall be filed in a supplemental clerk’s record with this Court no later than January 28 , 201 9

. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Judge McCraw , Collin County District Clerk Lynne Finley , and all counsel of record.
We ABATE the appeal , including the deadline to file appellant’s brief, to allow the trial court an opportunity to comply with this order. The appeal will be reinstated no later than January 31 , 201 9

.
/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
#### WICHITA VALLEY RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. G. F. BOONE, Appellee.

No. 956.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

March 4, 1932.

Rehearing Denied March 25, 1932.

Dickson & Dickson, of Seymour, for appellant.

Wheat & Wheat, of Seymour, for appellee.

FUNDERBURK, J.

G. F. Boone brought this suit against Wich-ijta Valley Railway Company, Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Company, and Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Company to recover, damages for alleged injuries to, 269 head of live stock shipped from Valley Mills, Tex., to Fulda, Tex., about November 4,1930. The cause of action, as we construe the pleadings, was one upon a number of similar carrier’s contracts of shipment, a common obligation of the carrier in each of which was to transport the shipment to its destination with reasonable dispatch. The petition charged a breach of these obligations, with consequent shrinkage in weight and depreciation in value of the cattle to the extent of $1.50 per head, or an aggregate of $427.50, in which amount damages were claimed.

Upon the trial, the evidence haying shown that no part of the delay complained of occurred upon the lines of the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Company, or Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Company, the court instructed a verdict in favor of said defendants, as to which action no question is made.

As between plaintiff and Wichita Valley Railway’ Company, special issues were submitted to the jury, which, with the jury’s findings, were as follows:

> “Special1 Issue No. 1: Did the defendant, the Wichita Valley Railway Company, transport the plaintiff’s cattle from Wichita Falls, Texas, to Fulda, Texas, with reasonable dispatch? Answer yes or no. No.

> “Special Issue No. 2: Was there a ‘market’ for the plaintiff’s cattle at Fulda, Texas, on November 5, 1930? Answer yes or no. No.

> “Special Issue No. 3: What amount of ■money, if paid now, would compensate the plaintiff for his loss, if any? Answer in dollars and cents. $201.73.”

In connection with special issue No. 3, the court gave the following instruction: “Gentlemen of the Jury: You are instructed that the measure of damages, if you find there is a damage, is the difference between the intrinsic value of the plaintiff’s cattle at Fulda, Texas, in the condition in which they would have been delivered had they been transported with reasonable dispatch and their intrinsic value in their actual condition as and when delivered at Fulda.”

From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant Wichita Valley Railway Company has appealed.

It will be unnecessary for us to discuss the several propositions relied upon by the appellant for á reversal of the ease. Substantially, and in legal effect the same propositions, based upon the same state of facts and conditions of the record, are urged as in the case of Wichita Valley Ry. Co. v. Anderson (Tex. Civ. App.) 48 S.W.(2d) 361, this day decided. All of said propositions are overruled for the reasons discussed in the last-named opinion.

Being of opinion that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, it is accordingly so ordered.
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

Jones Apparel Group, Inc.New York, New YorkWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectusconstituting a part of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed May 15,1996, August 23, 1999 and August 2, 2001 of our reports dated February 1, 2002,except as to "Subsequent Event" which is as of March 19, 2002, relating to theconsolidated financial statements and schedule of Jones Apparel Group, Inc. andsubsidiaries appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2001.We also consent to the reference to us under the caption of "Experts"in the Prospectus.

|  | /s/ BDO Seidman, LLPBDO Seidman, LLP |
|--|--------------------------------------|

New York, New YorkMarch 25, 2002
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION **     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Hollings C. Renton, Chairman of the Board, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), and Gregory W. Schafer, VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of hisknowledge:**1.** The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, asamended, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and**2.** The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Reportand results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.Dated: November 15, 2007                                                     /s/ Hollings C. Renton   Hollings C. Renton   Chairman of the Board, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)                                                       /s/ Gregory W. Schafer   Gregory W. Schafer   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)    A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13(a)-14(b) of the Exchange Actand Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350) has beenprovided to Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.“This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofOnyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective ofany general incorporation language contained in such filing.”