alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

MAR - 5 2009 

"-rMAYERWH 

II .. n.~ mlNGTON C'l:ou .,..,. ong,rllCT COURt' IoIJ1I\ 

Harvey 1. Hudson, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

United States Attorney General et ai., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 09 0419 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff s pro se complaint and his application to 

proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis 

and dismiss the complaint. 

Plaintiff, a federal prisoner now confined at the U.S. Penitentiary at Tuscon, Arizona, has 

filed a complaint 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for $50 billion in damages and for injunctive relief. (CompI. 

~~ 22-23.) He alleges that when he was taken from his cell at the U.S. Penitentiary at Allenwood 

on September 9,2008, to be transferred to the prison at Tuscon, he was required to leave behind, 

unpacked, all his personal belonging, papers, and effects. (Id. ~~ 10-11.) He alleges that he 

arrived at the Tuscan facility approximately two months later, and that by the end of January 

2009 he had not received any of the belongings he had been forced to leave behind. (Id. ~ 12.) 

He alleges negligent and/or willful theft and/or destruction of his property. (Id. ~~ 9, 14.) 

Asserting that some of the missing papers were particularly valuable for the information they 

contained, he contends that his missing property is evidence of a widespread conspiracy by the 

defendants to violate his constitutional rights, and he seeks the arrest and prosecution of the 

defendants. (Id. ~~ 14-14). 

..3 
Section 1983 provides a remedy where a person has been deprived of any "rights, 

privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws." 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Although 

plaintiff conclusorily alleges a violation of his constitutional rights, he has not identified the 

constitutional right he thinks was violated and the facts he alleges do not suggest the violation of 

a constitutional right. At the most, the factual allegations in the complaint suggest negligent or 

willful theft or destruction of personal property, a matter that may possibly be cognizable as a tort 

claim, but does not implicate constitutional protections. Therefore, plaintiff has not stated a 

claim under 42 U.S.c. § 1983 upon which relief may be granted. To the extent that the plaintiff 

seeks the criminal prosecution of the defendants, his complaint also fails for failure to state a 

claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 upon which relief may be granted. Only the federal government 

can bring a federal criminal prosecution. 

Because the complaint does not state a claim upon which relief may be granted, federal 

law obligates this Court to dismiss this complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (requiring a court to 

dismiss a complaint if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted). A final order 

accompanies this memorandum opinion. 

L( ~ L. J JjUrdC --~----------------

United States District Judge 

2
EXHIBIT 10.11(e)

April 28,
2003

Ms. Trudy
Briley
DSM Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
P.O. Box 1887
Greenville, NC 27835-1887



Dear
Ms. Briley:

This
letter is to confirm our understanding concerning an amendment to be made with respect to the Toll Manufacturing and Packaging Agreement dated as of August 24, 1999, as
amended by Amendment No.1 dated July 3, 2001, by Amendment No. 2 dated October 9, 2001, and by Amendment No. 3 dated June 21, 2002 (the "Agreement"), between
Cephalon, Inc. ("Cephalon") and DSM Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("DSM"). All terms not otherwise defined herein are used as defined in the Agreement.

The
purpose of this Amendment is to extend the Initial Term of the Agreement for one year and to set the minimum annual quantities of Product to be purchased by Cephalon and to increase
the manufacturing capacity reserved by Catalytica for the remainder of the Initial Term of the Agreement. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:



If
the foregoing accurately reflects your understanding as to these matters, please indicate your agreement in the space provided below, and return one fully-executed original to me.

|                               |                                                                      |  | Very truly yours,                                    
|------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                               |                                                                      |  | /s/ Robert Urban
Vice President, Technical Operations
|Acknowledged and agreed to by: |                                                                      | 
|DSM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.      |                                                                      | 
|By:                            | /s/TERENCE S. NOVAKName: Terence S. Novak
Title: Sr. V.P. Comm. Ops. |  |                                                      

---

Schedule F
Minimum Quantities

The minimum annual quantities to be purchased by CEPHALON and capacity to be reserved by DSM, are as follows for the remainder of the Initial Term of this
Agreement:

Year

Quantity2004

[**]2005 (until 8/24/05)

[**]


Pursuant
to Section 3.1, if the actual annual quantity exceeds the minimum annual quantity in any year by twenty-five percent (25%) or less, this excess will reduce
the minimum annual quantity in the following year.

A-1

---
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0530 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-075-AD

Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron Model 412, 412EP, and 412CF Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 83 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: These actions in this AD are intended to detect a crack in the collective lever, which 

could lead to failure of the collective lever and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $12,883 (to replace a collective lever)

Labor per Helicopter

(1 x $85/work-hour for the 

inspection)

(10 work-hours for the 

replacement)

$85

$850

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $85 for the inspection (per inspection cycle)

$13,733 for the replacement

Total US Fleet Cost $7,055 for the inspection (per inspection cycle)

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Martin Crane
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ADDvantage Technologies Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) I, Kenneth A. Chymiak, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Kenneth A. Chymiak


Name:    Kenneth A. Chymiak


Title:      President and Chief Executive Officer


Date:      December 14, 2010
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-3499

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Brendon Darnell Thomas

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

 ____________

 Submitted: May 14, 2024

Filed: May 17, 2024

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Brendon Darnell Thomas appeals after he pled guilty to a drug conspiracy

charge, pursuant to a written plea agreement containing an appeal waiver, and the
district court1

 imposed a below-Guidelines sentence. His counsel has moved to

withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable,

and applicable to the issues raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d

702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of the validity and applicability of an appeal

waiver); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc)

(appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the

defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and waiver, and

enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice).

We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the

appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and dismiss this

appeal.

______________________________

1The Honorable Ronnie L. White, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

-2-
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2225 

To reauthorize the Blue Ridge National Heritage Area. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 13, 2017 

Mr. BURR (for himself and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Blue Ridge National Heritage Area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Blue Ridge National 

5 Heritage Area Reauthorization Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE BLUE RIDGE NATIONAL 

7 HERITAGE AREA. 

8 Section 140(j) of the Department of the Interior and 

9 Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2004 (54 U.S.C. 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2225 IS

1 320101 note; Public Law 108–108; 117 Stat. 1280) is 

2 amended by striking ‘‘15 years’’ and inserting ‘‘19 years’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Forms S-8 No. 33-42933, 33-76408, 33-76410, 33-76412 and 333-05431) of
Cambridge NeuroScience, Inc. of our report dated January 13, 1997, except for
Note H as to which date is February 26, 1997, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Cambridge NeuroScience, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.
        
        

                                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                      ---------------------
                                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 19, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MEDIMMUNE,
INC.'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO REFERENCE TO SUCH FILING.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          12,629
<SECURITIES>                                   102,136
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,287
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,060
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,713
<PP&E>                                          29,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,536
<BONDS>                                         70,874
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           218
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   163,971
<SALES>                                         35,782
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,099
<CGS>                                           19,678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,263
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,544)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,544)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,544)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.41)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SWIFT ENERGY
PENSION PARTNERS 1995B LTD'S BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS CONTAINED
IN ITS FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEP-30-1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,850,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,465
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,923,694
<PP&E>                                         211,358
<DEPRECIATION>                                (16,643)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,118,409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          270,040
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,848,369
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,118,409
<SALES>                                         36,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               151,860
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,643<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,058
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             53,058
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,058
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES LEASE OPERATING EXPENSES, PRODUCTION TAXES AND DEPRECIATION AND
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE. EXCLUDES GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE AND INTEREST EXPENSE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 236 (Thursday, December 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 76628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER01-41-000; ER01-42-000]


Sithe Fore River Development LLC and Sithe Mystic Development 
LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

December 1, 2000.
    Sithe Fore River Development LLC and Sithe Mystic Development LLC 
(together, ``Applicants'') submitted for filing rate schedules under 
which Applicants will engage in wholesale electric power and energy 
transactions at market-based rates. Applicants also requested waiver of 
various Commission regulations. In particular, Applicants requested 
that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by 
Applicants.
    On November 29, 2000, pursuant to delegated authority, the 
Director, Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, 
Tariffs and Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under part 34, 
subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Applicants should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
358.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Applicants are 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purpose of the Applicants, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Applicants' issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is December 29, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-31123 Filed 12-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 10.27

                              RIDER NO. 1 TO THE

                      SECOND AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF

                          RIDERS NOS. 1 AND 2 TO THE

                        MASTER LEASE FINANCE AGREEMENT

     This Rider No. 1 to the Second Amendment and Restatement of Riders Nos. 1
and 2 (the "Rider") is entered into between BancBoston Leasing Inc. ("Lessor")
and Benchmarq Microelectronics, Inc. ("Lessee"), and is contemporaneous with and
amends the Master Lease Finance Agreement dated as of April 23, 1992 (the "Lease
Agreement") between Lessor and Lessee.  It is the intention of Lessor and Lessee
that, upon execution, this Amended and Restated Rider shall constitute a part of
the Lease Agreement.
 
     IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual covenants and promises as hereinafter set
forth, Lessor and Lessee hereby agree as follows:

     1.    All capitalized terms used in this Amended and Restated Rider shall,
unless otherwise defined, have the meanings set forth in the Lease Agreement.

     2.    Replace Section 13A.2(b) of the Lease Agreement with the following:

     "(b)  Quick Ratio.  Lessee shall at all times maintain a "Quick Ratio" of
(i) cash and cash equivalents plus accounts receivable to (ii) current
liabilities of not less than 1.50 : 1.00 as of the end of each fiscal quarter."

     The terms and conditions of this Rider shall prevail where there may be
conflicts or inconsistencies with the terms and conditions of the Lease
Agreement.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lessor and Lessee, each by its duly authorized officer
or agent, have duly executed and delivered this Rider which is intended to take
effect as a sealed instrument as of the date of the Lease Agreement.


                              BENCHMARQ MICROELECTRONICS, INC.

                              By:  /s/    R. Scott Schaefer
                                 -------------------------------
                              Title:       Corporate Controller
                                    ----------------------------

Accepted at Boston, Massachusetts

BANCBOSTON LEASING INC.


By:  /s/  Susan Sintros
   -------------------------------
Title:  Assistant Vice President
      ----------------------------


RG3644/07/12/96 3:35 PM
bench/rdr2a&r.doc
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2218 

To provide for the conveyance of a Forest Service site in Dolores County, 

Colorado, to be used for a fire station. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2017 

Mr. BENNET (for himself and Mr. GARDNER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the conveyance of a Forest Service site in 

Dolores County, Colorado, to be used for a fire station. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘West Fork Fire Sta5 tion Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) COUNTY.—The term ‘‘County’’ means Dolo9 res County, Colorado. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2218 IS

1 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of Agriculture. 

3 (3) WEST FORK FIRE STATION CONVEYANCE

4 PARCEL.—The term ‘‘West Fork Fire Station Con5 veyance Parcel’’ means the parcel of approximately 

6 3.61 acres of National Forest System land in the 

7 County, as depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Map for 

8 West Fork Fire Station Conveyance Parcel’’ and 

9 dated November 21, 2017. 

10 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF WEST FORK FIRE STATION CON11 VEYANCE PARCEL, DOLORES COUNTY, COLO12 RADO. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—On receipt of a request from the 

14 County and subject to such terms and conditions as are 

15 mutually satisfactory to the Secretary and the County, in16 cluding such additional terms as the Secretary determines 

17 to be necessary, the Secretary shall convey to the County 

18 without consideration all right, title, and interest of the 

19 United States in and to the West Fork Fire Station Con20 veyance Parcel. 

21 (b) COSTS.—Any costs relating to the conveyance 

22 under subsection (a), including processing and transaction 

23 costs, shall be paid by the County. 

24 (c) USE OF LAND.—The land conveyed to the County 

25 under subsection (a) shall be used by the County only for 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2218 IS

1 a fire station, related infrastructure, and roads to facili2 tate access to and through the West Fork Fire Station 

3 Conveyance Parcel. 

4 (d) REVERSION.—If any portion of the land conveyed 

5 under subsection (a) is used in a manner that is incon6 sistent with the use described in subsection (c), the land 

7 shall, at the discretion of the Secretary, revert to the 

8 United States. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS