alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         December 6, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         11 am to 12 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         45 Natcher Bldg, Rm 5As.25u, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Richard J. Bartlett, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Natcher Bldg./Bldg. 45, Room 5As37B, (301) 594-4952.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the require and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institute of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 1, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-31198 Filed 12-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### CODY v. STATE.

No. 14794.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 27, 1932.

Kehearing Denied March 2, 1932.

Jas. A. Harley and J. W. Gaines, both of San Antonio, for appellant.

J. Turner Vance, of Eefugio, and Dloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MOEEOW, P. J.

The offense is injury to a fence as denounced by article 1350, P. O. 1925; penalty assessed at a fine of $50.

It is charged that the fence of W. D. Eea was pulled down and injured by the appellant.

The statement of facts was signed by the attorneys and by the trial judge on the 21st day of August, 1931. There are no in-dorsements showing the date of its filing. The judgment bears the date of May 19, 1931. Notice of appeal was given at that time. We have observed no extension of the time within which to file the statement of ■facts. The time allowed by law is not exceeding thirty days after notice of appeal.

A written charge was given by the court to the jury.

There are some exceptions filed; also some requested charges which were refused. Without a statement of facts which we would be authorized to consider, any complaints of the charge of the court or of the refusal of special charges cannot be appraised by this court. None of them are so drawn or contain matter which, in the absence of a statement of facts, show error. As the record is before us, no error is presented which would authorize a reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.

*298On Motion for Rehearing.

LATTIMORE, J.

 In our original opinion, we did not discuss appellant’s complaint based on the fact that the information was signed by the district attorney. This complaint is renewed, and the point is made that an information can only be signed by the county attorney. It is specifically provided in articles 28, 29, and 30 of our Code of Criminal Procedure that, whenever complaints are made before a district or county attorney that an offense has been committed in his district or county, he shall reduce the complaint to writing, have it signed and sworn to, and, if same be a misdemeanor, he shall forthwith pre-' pare an information .based upon such complaint and file the same in the court having jurisdiction. For the purpose mentioned, either the district or county attorney is expressly authorized to administer oaths. Article .413, C. C. P., also in terms provides for an information to be filed and presented “by the district or county attorney,” etc. We regret our inability to agree with appellant’s contention that the district attorney is forbidden by the Constitution to sign and file an information in the county court of any county in his district. The contention seems directly contrary to the statutes, and we are of opinion the statutes are constitutional.

The motion for rehearing will be overruled.

MORROW, -P. J., absent.
STORAGE USA, INC.

                               AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO
                   1995 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE AND LOAN PLAN

         This Amendment No. 3, dated as of August 5, 1999 to the Storage USA,
Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Purchase and Loan Plan recites and provides as follows:

                  WHERAS, at a meeting held on August 4, 1999, the Board of
Directors (the "Board") of Storage USA, Inc. (the "Company") and the
Compensation Committee of the Board determined, pursuant to Article III and
Article XI of the Plan, to amend the Company's 1995 Employee Stock Purchase and
Loan Plan (the "Plan") to eliminate the requirement contained in Section 7.02 of
the Plan that a Participant's spouse execute Notes under the Plan.


         NOW, THEREFORE, Article 7.02 of the Plan is amended by deleting
         therefrom references to the Participant's spouse and the requirement
         that a Participant's spouse execute Notes delivered under the Plan.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 3 to be
executed as of the date first above written.


                                STORAGE USA, INC.



                                By:    /s/ John W. McConomy
                                       --------------------
                                Name:  John W. McConomy
                                Its:   Executive Vice President, General Counsel
                                              and Secretary
                                Dated: August 5, 1999
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00477-CV

IN RE LESLIE ANN TAYLORSCALESRELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied, and the stay is lifted.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: December 20, 2012

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
#### In re Lytton.

(No. 28750

Decided November 5, 1941.)

*Messrs. Woodle & Wachtel,*for appellant, Benjamin G-. Lytton.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. Howard Bernstein,*for appellee, Ohio State Dental Board.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no ■ debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2075 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2075

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude corporations 
   operating prisons from the definition of taxable REIT subsidiary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 6, 2017

   Mr. Wyden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude corporations 
   operating prisons from the definition of taxable REIT subsidiary.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ending Tax Breaks for Private 
Prisons Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CORPORATIONS OPERATING PRISON FACILITIES FROM 
              DEFINITION OF TAXABLE REIT FACILITY.

    (a) In General.--Section 856(l)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) any corporation which--
                            ``(i) directly or indirectly operates or 
                        manages a lodging facility or a health care 
                        facility, or
                            ``(ii) directly or indirectly operates or 
                        manages a prison facility or provides services 
                        at or in connection with a prison facility, 
                        and'';
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``any lodging facility 
        or health care facility'' and inserting ``any lodging facility, 
        health care facility, or prison facility''; and
            (3) by striking the last sentence and inserting the 
        following: ``Subparagraph (B) shall not apply to rights 
        provided to an eligible independent contractor to operate or 
        manage a lodging facility, a health care facility, or a prison 
        facility if such rights are held by such corporation as a 
        franchisee, licensee, or in a similar capacity and such lodging 
        facility, health care facility, or prison facility is either 
        owned by such corporation or is leased to such corporation from 
        the real estate investment trust.''.
    (b) Definition of Prison Facility.--Section 856(l)(4) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Prison facility.--The term `prison facility' 
                means any correctional, detention, or penal 
                facility.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                     Exhibit 3.3

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                           PRENTISS PROPERTIES TRUST'S
                           AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS

     This First Amendment to Prentiss Properties Trust's Amended and Restated
Bylaws (the "Bylaws") hereby amends the Bylaws effective as of February 12, 2002
in the following respects:

     1. Article II, Section 4 is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety
with the following language:

          Section 4. NOTICE. Not less than ten nor more than 90 days before each
                     ------
     meeting of shareholders, the secretary shall give to each shareholder
     entitled to vote at such meeting and to each shareholder not entitled to
     vote who is entitled to notice of the meeting written or printed notice
     stating the time and place of the meeting and, in the case of a special
     meeting or as otherwise may be required by any statute, the purpose for
     which the meeting is called, either by mail or by presenting it to such
     shareholder personally or by leaving it at the shareholder's residence or
     usual place of business or by any other means permitted by Maryland law. If
     mailed, such notice shall be deemed to be given when deposited in the
     United States mail addressed to the shareholder's address as it appears on
     the records of the Trust, with postage thereon prepaid.

     2. Article II, Section 9 is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety
with the following language:

          Section 9. PROXIES. A shareholder may cast the votes entitled to be
                     -------
     cast by the shares of beneficial interest owned of record by the
     shareholder in person or by proxy executed by the shareholder or by the
     shareholder's duly authorized agent in any manner permitted by law. Such
     proxy or evidence of authorization of such proxy shall be filed with the
     secretary of the Trust before or at the time of the meeting. No proxy shall
     be valid more than eleven months after its date, unless otherwise provided
     in the proxy.

Dated: April 2, 2002                          PRENTISS PROPERTIES TRUST


                                              By: /s/ Thomas F. August
                                                  ------------------------------
-------------
                                              Name: Thomas F. August
                                                    ----------------------------
                                              Title: President and CEO
                                                     ---------------------------
#### H. E. BELL v. STATE.

No. 15812.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 5, 1933.

Baker & Baker, of Coleman, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHBISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is conspiracy to rob; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

It was charged in the indictment that appellant, Charlie Bice, Joe Bice, Chick McKay, and Office Woods, acting together, unlawfully conspired, combined, confederated, and entered into a positive agreement with each other to commit the offense of robbery. We have not undertaken to set out the indictment, but merely call attention to the nature of the offense charged therein.

Rice v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 51 S.W.(2d) 364; Rice v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 53 S.W.(2d) 629; Joe Rice v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 59 S.W.(2d) 119, delivered March 29, 1933, and the present cause are companion cases. In the case first mentioned Willie Bice was *122convicted of conspiracy to rob. In the case found in 53 S.W.(2d) at page 629, Charlie Rice was convicted of robbery. In the case of Joe Rice, 'supra, the conviction was for conspiracy to rob. As we understand the record, the testimony is substantially the same as that revealed in the companion cases. In those cases it was held that the evidence was insufficient. Such holding appears to control the present appeal. It may be added that the record discloses that the present case was tried prior to the time the opinions in the companion eases were rendered.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00159-CV

In re David O’Connor

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Relator David O’Connor has filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion 

for emergency stay. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1, 52.10(a). We grant the motion and temporarily 

stay the portion of the trial court’s order concerning the award of attorney’s fees pending further 

order of this Court. See id. 52.10(b). The Court orders the real party in interest to file a response 

to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before April 19, 2021.

It is ordered on April 9, 2021.

Before Justices Goodwin, Triana, and Kelly
##### 



Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION

I, Paul Knauss, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
DaimlerChrysler Services North America LLC, the Servicer of CARCO Auto Loan
Master Trust, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of CARCO Auto Loan Master
Trust;

Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the
period covered by this annual report;

Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be
provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these
reports;

I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge
and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except
disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
agreements; and

The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicers
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

Date: March 15, 2004

|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul E. Knauss                                        
|                                                          
|Paul E. Knauss, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|DaimlerChrysler Services North America LLC,               
|as Servicer of CARCO Auto Loan Master
Trust
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 202 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 202

To amend the Social Security Act relating to the use of determinations 
                       made by the Commissioner.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2017

Mr. Crapo (for himself, Mr. Paul, Mr. Moran, Mr. Heller, Mr. Hatch, Mr. 
  Inhofe, Mr. Daines, and Mr. Roberts) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Social Security Act relating to the use of determinations 
                       made by the Commissioner.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Beneficiary 2nd 
Amendment Rights Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF DETERMINATIONS MADE BY THE COMMISSIONER.

    (a) Title II.--Section 205(j) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
405(j)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(11) No determination by the Commissioner of Social Security with 
respect to an individual, including a determination that benefits under 
this title to which such individual is entitled shall be paid to a 
representative payee, shall be considered to be a determination that 
the individual has been adjudicated as a mental defective for purposes 
of subsections (d)(4) and (g)(4) of section 922 of title 18, United 
States Code.''.
    (b) Title XVI.--Section 1631(a)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
1383(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(J) No determination by the Commissioner of Social Security with 
respect to an individual, including a determination that benefits under 
this title to which such individual is entitled shall be paid to a 
representative payee, shall be considered to be a determination that 
the individual has been adjudicated as a mental defective for purposes 
of subsections (d)(4) and (g)(4) of section 922 of title 18, United 
States Code.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                              207,492
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                     5,865,394
<ALLOWANCES>                        125,000
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  6,626,317
<PP&E>                           18,890,196
<DEPRECIATION>                    9,993,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   15,933,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             2,995,781
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                           5,500
<COMMON>                             85,121
<OTHER-SE>                        5,262,972
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     15,933,967
<SALES>                          24,431,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 24,431,385
<CGS>                            15,391,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    15,391,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     14,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  593,127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   1,302,029
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               1,302,029
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                      1,302,029
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .12
        

</TABLE>