alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

Exhibit 23.2

         REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Board of Directors and Stockholders
U.S. Bioscience, Inc.

We have  audited  the  consolidated  balance  sheet of U.S.  Bioscience,  Inc. as of  December  31,  1998 and the related  consolidated
statements  of  operations,  cash flows and  stockholders'  equity for the year then ended (not  presented  separately  herein).  These
consolidated  financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's  management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing  standards  generally  accepted in the United States.  Those standards  require that
we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable  assurance about whether the consolidated  financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit  includes  examining,  on a test  basis,  evidence  supporting  the amounts and  disclosures  in the  financial
statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant  estimates made by management,  as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,  the financial  statements  referred to above present fairly,  in all material  respects,  the  consolidated  financial
position of U.S.  Bioscience,  Inc. at December 31, 1998,  and the  consolidated  results of its  operations and its cash flows for the
year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 15, 1999
```
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1987 

To provide for the conveyance to the State of Iowa of the reversionary 

interest held by the United States in and to certain land in 

Pottawattamie County, Iowa, and to express the sense of Congress relating to the continued provision of information relating to certain national 

historic trails. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 19, 2017 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mrs. ERNST) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the conveyance to the State of Iowa of the 

reversionary interest held by the United States in and 

to certain land in Pottawattamie County, Iowa, and to 

express the sense of Congress relating to the continued 

provision of information relating to certain national historic trails. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pottawattamie County 

5 Reversionary Interest Conveyance Act’’. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1987 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST RE2 QUIRED. 

3 (a) CONVEYANCE.—Not later than 90 days after the 

4 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 

5 shall convey, without consideration, to the State of Iowa 

6 the reversionary interest held by the United States and 

7 described in the quitclaim deed dated April 13, 1998, in8 strument number 19170, as recorded in book 98, page 

9 55015, in Pottawattamie County, Iowa. 

10 (b) COSTS.—As a condition of the conveyance under 

11 subsection (a), all costs associated with the conveyance 

12 under that subsection shall be paid by the State of Iowa, 

13 including the costs of the phase I environmental site as14 sessment. 

15 SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS RELATING TO PROVISION OF 

16 INFORMATION RELATING TO CERTAIN NA17 TIONAL HISTORIC TRAILS. 

18 It is the sense of Congress that the State of Iowa 

19 should continue to provide information relating to the 

20 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail, the California 

21 National Historic Trail, and the Mormon Pioneer National 

22 Historic Trail after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1063 

To repeal a requirement with respect to the procurement and acquisition 

of alternative fuels. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2009 

Mr. HENSARLING (for himself, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. CANTOR, and Mr. PENCE) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

A BILL 

To repeal a requirement with respect to the procurement 

and acquisition of alternative fuels. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL. 

4 Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security 

5 Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 17142) is repealed. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of ImmuLogic Pharmaceutical Corporation on Form S-3 (File No. 333-3086) and Form
S-8 (File Nos. 33-89024, 33-89020, 33-89022, 33-50858, 33-42489, 33-42552,
33-41921, 333-08423 and 333-08425) of our report dated February 3, 1998, except
for the information in the last paragraph of Note D as to which the date is
February 27, 1998, on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of
ImmuLogic Pharmaceutical Corporation as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/ Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.
-----------------------------
Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.

Boston, Massachusetts
March 26, 1998
Order entered May 13 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 14

- 00513

- CV

IN RE OMP DEVELOPMENT, LLC , Relator

Original Proceeding from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 13

- 0 1265



### O RDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. We DENY relator’s motion to stay as moot . We ORDER that relator bear the

costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ JIM MOSELEY JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         3416490                 8688162
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4112                   81566
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3489405                 8899774
<PP&E>                                         2050115                 1585820
<DEPRECIATION>                                  860732                  538378
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6822126                11354118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           271495                  377449
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                          2888                    2883
<OTHER-SE>                                     6183746                10614830
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6822126                11354118
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 26965                  322565
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1862                    2085
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (4860079)               (4152866)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.21)                  (4.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.21)                  (4.14)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Telecommunications Income Fund IX (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
J. Berthel, Chief Executive Officer of Commercial Power Finance, Inc., General
Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


March 29, 2004                       /s/ Thomas J. Berthel
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                         Thomas J. Berthel
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         Commercial Power Finance, Inc.
                                         General Partner
                                         Telecommunications Income Fund IX, L.P.
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 4, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00486-CR

NO. 14-21-00487-CR

NO. 14-21-00488-CR

 

CLARENCE WILLIAMS JUNIOR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 21st District Court

Washington County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 19107, 19117, 19118

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant appeals the trial court’s assessment of punishment of 50 years’ 

incarceration to run concurrently for each of the following offenses: (1) assault 

against a family member with a previous conviction enhanced to habitual (No. 14-

21-00486-CR); (2) burglary of a habitation with intent to commit other felony
2

enhanced to habitual (No. 14-21-00487-CR); (3) burglary of a habitation with 

intent to commit other felony enhanced to habitual (No. 14-21-00488-CR); (4) 

aggravated assault with a deadly weapon enhanced to habitual (No. 14-21-00488-

CR); (5) assault against a family member with a previous conviction enhanced to 

habitual (No. 14-21-00488-CR); (6) assault against a family member impeding

breath with a previous conviction enhanced to habitual (No. 14-21-00486-CR); and 

(7) the trial court’s assessment of 10 years’ confinement to run concurrently for the 

offense of evading arrest with a previous conviction enhanced to a second-degree 

felony (No. 14-21-00487-CR). See Tex. Penal Code §§ 22.01(b)(2)(A); 30.02(d);

22.02(a)(2); 22.01(b)(2)(B); and 38.04(b)(1). Appellant pleaded guilty to all counts 

and entered a plea of true to all enhancement paragraphs. The trial court certified 

appellant’s right to appeal as to punishment only. 

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirement of Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record 

and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. 

State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised 

of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford 

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant’s request, the 

record was provided to him. On May 26, 2022, appellant filed a pro se response to 

counsel’s brief.

We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s 

response, and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we 

find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing 

to the jurisprudence of the state. We are not to address the merits of each claim 
3

raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are 

no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Wilson. 

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
#### Mosey, Appellant, *v.*Hiestand, Trustee, et al., Appellees. Schultz, Appellee, *v.*Killmer et al., Appellants.

(Nos. 28360 and 28482

Decided May 14, 1941.)

*Mr. Leo A. Burke*and *Mr. John P. Burke,*for appellant, Mesoda Mosey.

*Messrs. King é Young*and *Mr. John V. Bye,*for appellee, Andrew J. Hiestand, individually, and as trustee and administrator.

*Messrs. Lurie S Zaller,*for appellee, Robert J. Schultz.

*Messrs. Locher, Green & Woods,*for appellants, Louis D. Killmer and others. ,

By the Court.

These causes were argued on the same date and involve the same question.

In each, the Court of Appeals refused to permit the notice of appeal to be amended by correcting the date of the rendition of the judgment. In cause No. 28360, the notice of appeal recited that the final order appealed from was made on February 9, 1940, instead of the correct date which was January 3, 1940.

In'cause No. 28482, the notice of appeal gave the date of the rendition of the judgment as March 10, 1940, instead of the correct date which was June 18, 1940.

In the case of *Couk*v. *Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp., ante,*110, the notice of appeal stated erroneously that the judgment had been rendered on the 13th day *250of November instead of the 14th day of November. The Court of Appeals permitted the notice to be amended. This court, in affirming the judgment of the appellate court, held that that court had power to make the amendment under and by virtue of Section 12223-5, General Code. In the opinion, Judge Bettman used this language: “The type of error in the present notice of appeal, we hold to be subject to correction by amendment permitted ‘in the furtherance of justice for good cause shown.’ ”

In each of the present cases the Court of Appeals refused leave to amend and dismissed the appeal. At that time the practice had not been settled by the decision.in the *Couk case*which removes the doubt as to correct procedure.

For error in refusing the amendments and in dismissing the appeals, in each case the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause remanded to the appellate court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

*Judgments reversed and causes remanded.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.

Matthias, J., not participating.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trimol Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

 

 
|   | /s/ Yuri Benenson       |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Yuri Benenson           |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | TRIMOL GROUP, INC.      |

 

 

 

May 16, 2005

 

21

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         119,703
<SECURITIES>                                 2,499,491
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,998
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    585,582
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,403,849
<PP&E>                                       2,807,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                 197,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,068,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,829,138
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,343
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,150,634
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,068,588
<SALES>                                      1,475,577
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,475,577
<CGS>                                        1,318,743
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,520,980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (91,719)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (953,684)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (953,684)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (953,684)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains financial information extracted from the
Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         13,060
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  146,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                   24,586
<INVENTORY>                                    55,330
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               217,259
<PP&E>                                         92,911
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (27,446)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 536,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          259,072
<BONDS>                                        164,322
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       15
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,804
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   536,292
<SALES>                                        278,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               278,287
<CGS>                                          258,297
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  258,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             16,781
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (35,998)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,823
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (39,778)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (75,372)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (115,150)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (7.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (7.67)


</TABLE>