alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 11, 2016

No. 04-16-00543-CR

David Gerardo RINCON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CRB000880 L2

Honorable Jesus Garza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

A jury found appellant David Gerardo Rincon guilty of the offense of Driving While 

Intoxicated, Class B, and assessed his punishment at 150 days in jail and a $2,000.00 fine. The 

trial court entered a judgment after verdict. Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal, but the 

clerk’s record does not contain a trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal.

“The trial court shall enter a certification of the defendant’s right of appeal each time it 

enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Generally, a 

trial court’s judgment after verdict is a judgment of guilt and is an appealable order. See id.; 

Cortez v. State, 420 S.W.3d 803, 805 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

ANN. art. 44.02 (West 2006); TEX. R. APP. P. 33.1. 

Therefore, we ORDER the presiding judge of County Court at Law No. 2 of Webb 

County, Texas to (1) sign a completed certification indicating whether the defendant has a right 

of appeal and (2) forward it to the Webb County Clerk within TWENTY DAYS of the date of 

this order. 

We FURTHER ORDER the Webb County Clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right of appeal in this court within 

TEN DAYS after the trial court provides the certification to the clerk. See TEX. R. APP. P.

34.5(c)(2). 
_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of October, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-43001, 33-49234, 333-27613, 333-95725, 333-31464, 333-31379 and 333-61002
and Form S-3 No. 333-101514) of ESB Financial Corporation, of our report dated February 11, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of ESB Financial Corporation and subsidiaries incorporated by reference in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young LLP   
|                        
|Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
|March 10, 2004
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judge McClanahan, Senior Judges Coleman and Annunziata 

DERRICK HORTON 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 0063-06-1 PER CURIAM 

 JUNE 27, 2006 

CITY OF HAMPTON 

 DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES 

 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF HAMPTON 

William C. Andrews, III, Judge 

 (M. Woodrow Griffin, Jr., on brief), for appellant. 

 (Rachel F. Allen, Assistant City Attorney; Tonya Henderson–Stith, 

Guardian ad litem for the infant child; McDermott, Roe & Walter, on 

brief), for appellee. 

 Derrick Horton appeals the trial court’s decision terminating his parental rights to T.H. 

pursuant to Code §§ 16.1-283(C)(1) and (2). Horton contends (1) the evidence failed to prove 

termination was justified and (2) his incarceration was an insufficient basis to terminate his 

parental rights. 

 The trial court terminated Horton’s residual parental rights based upon Code 

§§ 16.1-283(C)(1) and (2). On appeal, Horton presents no argument that the trial court erred in 

terminating his parental rights pursuant to Code § 16.1-283(C)(1) (i.e., that he “failed to maintain 

continuing contact with and to provide or substantially plan for the future of the child for a 

period of six months after the child’s placement in foster care”). When termination of parental 

rights under one subdivision of Code § 16.1-283 is upheld or not contested, we need not consider 

termination under alternative subdivisions. See Fields v. Dinwiddie County Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 
- 2 -

46 Va. App. 7, 8, 614 S.E.2d 656, 659 (2005). Accordingly, because Horton fails to contest 

termination pursuant to Code § 16.1-283(C)(1), we summarily affirm the decision of the trial 

court. See Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.
```
**EXHIBIT 12**
```

```

                        JONES APPAREL GROUP, INC.
            COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                            (In millions)

                                          Year Ended December 31,
                                   ------------------------------------
                                       2001          2000          1999
                                   --------      --------      --------

Income before income taxes........   $399.8        $503.1        $314.6
                                   --------      --------      --------
Fixed charges
  Interest expense and
    amortization of
    financing costs...............     84.6         103.8          66.9
  Portion of rent expense
    representing interest.........     33.6          50.7          35.4
                                   --------      --------      --------
Total fixed charges...............    118.2         154.5         102.3
                                   --------      --------      --------
Income before income taxes and
  fixed charges...................   $518.0        $657.6        $416.9
                                   ========      ========      ========
Ratio of earnings to
  fixed charges...................      4.4           4.3           4.1
                                   ========      ========      ========
```
#### W. O. BELL v. STATE.

No. 15164.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 2, 1932.

P. B. Ward, of Cleburne, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for transporting intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

The record is here without statement of facts or bills of exception. All matters of procedure appear regular. No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

MORROW, P. J., absent.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the amended Annual Report of USCorp (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Dultz, Chief Executive and acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robert Dultz

Robert Dultz

Chief Executive and Chief Financial

Officer

Date: November 26, 2004
Order entered August 19, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00264-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.C. AND J.C., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-10-03756-U

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to recuse Justice Schenck. Justice 

Schenck voluntarily recuses himself from this appeal. Accordingly, the motion is 

GRANTED.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2222 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2222

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow for distributions 
       from 529 accounts for expenses associated with registered 
                        apprenticeship programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2017

  Mr. Daines (for himself, Mr. Booker, Ms. Murkowski, and Ms. Warren) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow for distributions 
       from 529 accounts for expenses associated with registered 
                        apprenticeship programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRIBUTIONS FROM 529S FOR REGISTERED APPRENTICESHIP 
              PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 529(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Certain expenses associated with registered 
                apprenticeship programs.--The term `qualified higher 
                education expenses' shall include books, supplies, and 
                equipment required for the enrollment or attendance of 
                a designated beneficiary in an apprenticeship program 
                registered and certified with the Secretary of Labor 
                under section 1 of the National Apprenticeship Act (29 
                U.S.C. 50).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to contributions made and distributions paid after December 31, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered November 13, 2012 

In The 

Court of Zippeatz 

fifth 3Distritt of Texao at 313affao 

No. 05-12-00565-CV 

JASON L. GRAMAN & MARTIN GRAMAN, Appellants 

V. 

IBP RETAIL NO. 5, LP, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 199-00508-2010 

ORDER 

The Court has before it appellee's November 8, 2012 second unopposed motion for 

extension of time to file its brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellee to file 

its brief by December 13, 2012. No further extensions will be granted absent a showing of 

exceptional circumstances. • 

MOLLY FRA IS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Trimol Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of
the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods covered in the Report. /s/ Jack Braverman

Jack Braverman
Chief Financial Officer
TRIMOL GROUP, INC.  November 12, 2004 22
OPEN PLAN SYSTEMS, INC.

                 Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             Three Months Ended
                                                                  March 31
                                                          1998                1997
                                                   ---------------------------------------
<S>                                                <C>                   <C> 

Weighted average shares outstanding during the
   period                                                    4,472               4,472

Assumed exercise of options less assumed                         -                   -
   acquisition of shares
                                                   ---------------------------------------
Total                                                        4,472               4,472
                                                   =======================================


Net loss used in computation                         $      (1,207)      $        (315)
                                                   =======================================

Loss per common share                                $      (.27)        $      (.07)
                                                   =======================================



</TABLE>
OSWER/OS RTI Washington, DC 20460 

## N ATIONAL 

## P RIORITIES 

## L IST 

## (NPL) ***Proposed Site*** October 2010 

### MILFORD CONTAMINATED AQUIFER Milford , Ohio Clermont County

 **Site Location :**  The Milford Contaminated Aquifer s ite is a ground water plume contaminated with chlorinated solvents in the vicinity of Main Street and Lila Avenue in the City of Milford, Clermont County, Ohio.

 **Site History:** Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were first detected in City of Milford public wells in 1986. The Ohio E nvironmental Protection A gency began searching for the so urce of the VOC contamination in 1991. Despite several investigations , the source of VOC contamination has not been identified.

 **Site Contamination/Contaminants:** Chlorinated solvents detected in ground water at the site include tetrachloroethene (PCE) ; trichloroethene (TCE); cis -1,2- dichloroethene (DCE); and 1,1,1

- trichloroethane (TCA) . The plume is estimated to extend approximately 3, 0 00 feet from the well field to its probable origin east of the well field

.

 **Potential Impacts on Surrounding Comm unity/Environment**  **:** T he City of Milford’s public supply wells were found to have been contaminated by VOCs. Samples collected from city well 3 before treatment contained PCE above its EPA’s Safe Drinking Wate r Act Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL)
, and TCE, cis -1,2- DCE, and 1,1,1- TCA above background levels. Samples collected from city well s 1 and 2 before
treatment contained PCE and 1,1,1

- TCA a bove background levels , and a sample collected from city well 4 before treatment was found to have 1,1,1-TCA above background levels. The City of Milford’s well field serves 6,000 people.

 **Response Activities (to date):** The City of Milford installed and maintains an air stripper to remove VOCs from its treated water.

 **Need for NPL Listing:** The State of Ohio referred the site to EPA because of the elevated VOCs found in the ground water which have contaminated the City of Milford’s public water supply wells. EPA received a letter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the state.

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regar ding the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet
at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1

- 888

- 42

- ATSDR or 1

- 888

- 422

- 8737.
U.S.~por1tMntal Tronspt>rlalloll 

O!l•te OJ tr.e Se<:rei':J!y ol Tror>IO'Y'~1i)fl 

Chief. Documentary Services Div. 

Depanment of Transpona<ion 

Washington. D.C. 20590 

DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR 

SERVICE Of' NOTICE. PROCESS. ORDERS 

DECISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS 

ATTENTION: DOCKET SECTION. C·SS 

LINEA AEREA CARGUERA DE COLOMBIA, S.A. D/B/N LANGO 

(Name of Company. please print) 

office at C.41/e iO{i- NO.$?. 

. ha\·ing its principal 

(Address) /306-0-M- CO/omh/4 

hereby de,ignutes. pursuont to section 46103 of Title 49 of the U.S. Code t fomterly section I 005tbJ of the Fetleml AI iatioo Act 

of 1958. o~ umendedJ rhe person named ~Jm\· ns its Agenl upon whom ser\·icc of uiJ notices and proce:.:..- am.! ull onleY!\. d~ci:dcw,, 

und rC"quiremems of the Depu11mem of·Tn.msponation may be made !Or and on behalf of :-.uid carrier. her!! by c:mceiing ull p~\'iou:-. 

desig:nalions of agents made by ic to rhe DOT. 

Charles F. Donley II, charles.donley@squirepb.com, 1-202-626-6~40 NameofAgent ______________ ~----------~~--~~----------------~-----

(Piease Print) 

1200 19th Street, N.W., Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20036 

Address -------------------------------·-----'-----------------

The Agent so designated has written his name and also his initials in the following space: 

Name~J~$ (Initials) (!. fiJ 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF. 

LINEA AEREA CARGL!ERA DE COLOMBIA, S.A. D/B/AJ LANGO 

---------------------------------has caused these 

(Name of Company) 

presents to be sigoed in its name by ,,..-fif.!..'fi.!.!..!!'M:..:..L!E_,...;.G~O"'-'-N'-G~O'"-R.:>!I}:.L ________________ , Presidenl 

(Please Print) 

of said company. and to be attested under its corporate seal by 

on this _:t,· ""'"~- day of i)c csml:ee 

ATTEST: 

(Secretary, or other officer} 

t OST F 1010.5 (1-95) 

(Secretary. or other Title) 

\9 2011./ 

LINEA AEREA CARGUERA DE COLOMBIA, S.A. D/8/N LANGO 

(Name of <;:ompany) 

By: ·-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [MT-073-00-1990-AC]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Western Montana Resource Advisory Council will convene on January 9, 2001, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., at the BLM Butte Field Office, 106 North Parkmont, Butte, Montana, 59701.

The topic for the meeting will be a discussion on future issues to be addressed by the Western Montana Resource Advisory Council.

The meeting is open to the public and written comments can be given to the Council. Oral comments may be presented to the Council at 11:30 a.m. The time allotted for oral comment may be limited, depending on the number of persons wishing to be heard. Individuals who plan to attend and need further information about the meeting, or who need special assistance, such as sign language or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Jean Nelson-Dean, Resource Advisory Coordinator, at the Butte Field Office, 106 North Parkmont, P.O. Box 3388, Butte, Montana 59702-3388, telephone 406-533-7617.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Richard Hotaling, Butte Field Manager, 406-494-5059, or Jean Nelson-Dean at the above address and telephone number.

Dated: December 1, 2000.

Richard Hotaling,

Field Manager.

[FR Doc. 00-31260 Filed 12-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-19-00260-CR

LABBERRIUS QUDON EVANS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Franklin County, Texas

Trial Court No. F-9330

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Our review of the clerk’s record, the supplemental clerk’s record, and the State’s exhibit 

three in this case indicates that they contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes 

“a driver’s license number, passport number, social security number, tax identification number or 

similar government-issued personal identification number.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(1). The 

clerk’s record, the supplemental clerk’s record, and the State’s exhibit three include social security 

numbers. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with 

the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP.

P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper 

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the 

clerk’s record, the supplemental clerk’s record, and the State’s exhibit three contain sensitive data, 

we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal these 

electronically filed records. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: February 25, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000874395
<NAME>                        PLM EQUIPMENT GROWTH FUND VI
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         9,226
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (402)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         67,292
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (36,829)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 64,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        30,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     31,622
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   64,063
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               19,926
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               16,301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (720)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                412
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            412
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   412
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.03)



</TABLE>