alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RONNIE FLORES,

Appellant, 

v.

HULL ASSOCIATES NORTH, LP 

AND HULL ASSOCIATES, LLC,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00154-CV

Appeal from the

419th District Court

of Travis County, Texas

(TC # D-1-GN-20-002933)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

summary judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that 

Appellees recover from Appellant and his sureties, if any, See TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment 

and all costs of this Court, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below 

for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2022.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
EXHIBIT 24.1

The undersigned constitutes and appoints SCOTT C. GROUT and BRIAN BRONSON, and each of them, as the undersigned's true and lawful attorneys and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for the
undersigned and in the undersigned's name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the RadiSys Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do any and all acts and things necessary or
advisable to be done, as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys and agents or either of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



|                          |  |                                    |  |                  
|------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|Signature                 |  | Title                              |  | Date             
|                          |  |                                   
|/s/ C. SCOTT GIBSON       |  | Chairman of the Board and Director |  | February 24, 2008
|C. Scott Gibson           |  |                                    |  |                  
|                          |  |                                   
|/s/ KEN BRADLEY           |  | Director                           |  | February 22, 2008
|Ken Bradley               |  |                                    |  |                  
|                          |  |                                   
|/s/ RICHARD J. FAUBERT    |  | Director                           |  | February 25, 2008
|Richard Faubert           |  |                                    |  |                  
|                          |  |                                   
|/s/ DR. WILLIAM W. LATTIN |  | Director                           |  | February 21, 2008
|Dr. William W. Lattin     |  |                                    |  |                  
|                          |  |                                   
|/s/ KEVIN C. MELIA        |  | Director                           |  | February 25, 2008
|Kevin C. Melia            |  |                                    |  |                  
|                          |  |                                   
|/s/ CARL NEUN             |  | Director                           |  | February 24, 2008
|Carl Neun                 |  |                                    |  |                  
|                          |  |                                   
|/s/ LORENE K. STEFFES     |  | Director                           |  | February 22, 2008
|Lorene K. Steffes         |  |                                    |  |
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2241 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act by clarifying 

that State Exchanges are prohibited from imposing fees or assessments 

on issuers of excepted benefits and standalone dental plans not sold 

through an Exchange. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 14, 2017 

Mr. KING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

by clarifying that State Exchanges are prohibited from 

imposing fees or assessments on issuers of excepted benefits and standalone dental plans not sold through an 

Exchange. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2241 IS

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITING STATE EXCHANGES FROM IM2 POSING ASSESSMENTS OR FEES ON EX3 CEPTED BENEFITS AND STANDALONE DEN4 TAL PLANS NOT SOLD THROUGH AN EX5 CHANGE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1311(d)(5) of the Patient 

7 Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 18031(d)(5)) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘, subject 

10 to subparagraph (C)’’ after ‘‘its operations’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub12 paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(C) LIMITATION.—A State may not 

14 charge a health insurance issuer, solely for pur15 poses of supporting an Exchange in accordance 

16 with subparagraph (A), an assessment, user fee, 

17 tax, or any other fee— 

18 ‘‘(i) on excepted benefits coverage 

19 within the meaning of section 2791(c) of 

20 the Public Health Service Act that is not 

21 sold on an Exchange; or 

22 ‘‘(ii) on standalone dental plans de23 scribed in paragraph (2)(B)(ii) that are 

24 not sold on an Exchange.’’. 

25 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

26 subsection (a) shall apply to assessments, user fees, taxes, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2241 IS

1 and other fees imposed, assessed, or collected on or after 

2 January 1, 2018, except that, with respect to the Ex3 change of the District of Columbia, such amendments 

4 shall apply to assessments, user fees, taxes, and other fees 

5 imposed, assessed, or collected on or after January 1, 

6 2020. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)**

**UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Subhash C. Sarda, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Novoste Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 4, 2003
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7078
JOSEPH W. LEE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus EARL D. BESHEARS, Warden, E.C.I.; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA96-223-CCB) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 26, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph W. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order and order on reconsideration denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Lee v. Beshears , No. CA-96-223-CCB (D. Md. June 20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<page>			       EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Select L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry, Chief
Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.








By:	  /s/	Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 31, 2006
The State o



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 9, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00383

- CR

Sean LEBO

,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 14, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 413956

Honorable Bill C. White, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appointed counsel for appellant Sean Lebo has filed a motion to abate this appeal and

remand the case to the trial court. We grant the motion. The appeal is abated and the case is

remanded to the trial court. We order the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether

there is a potential conflict of interest that disqualifies counsel from continuing to represent

appellant in this matter a nd to appoint new appellate counsel if necessary.

We further order the trial court to cause a record of its findings and orders in this matter

to be filed in this court by January 8, 2015.

_________________________________ Lu z Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of December, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1293 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase in the 

amount payable by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to veterans for 

improvements and structural alterations furnished as part of home health 

services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2009 

Mr. BUYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an 

increase in the amount payable by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to veterans for improvements and structural alterations furnished as part of home health services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disabled Veterans 

5 Home Improvement and Structural Alteration Grant In6 crease Act of 2009’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1293 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN AMOUNT AVAILABLE TO DISABLED 

2 VETERANS FOR IMPROVEMENTS AND STRUC3 TURAL ALTERATIONS FURNISHED AS PART 

4 OF HOME HEALTH SERVICES. 

5 (a) INCREASE.—Section 1717(a)(2) of title 38, 

6 United States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘$4,100’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘$6,800’’; and 

9 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘$1,200’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘$2,000’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to a veteran who 

13 first applies for benefits under section 1717(a)(2) of title 

14 38, United States Code, on or after the date of the enact15 ment of this Act. 

16 (c) APPLICABILITY.—A veteran who exhausts such 

17 veteran’s eligibility for benefits under section 1717(a)(2) 

18 of title 38, United States Code, before the date of the en19 actment of this Act, is not entitled to additional benefits 

20 under such section by reason of the amendments made 

21 by subsection (a). 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2122 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 regarding reasonable break 

time for nursing mothers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2017 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Ms. WARREN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. 

CASEY, Mr. WYDEN, and Mr. FRANKEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 regarding 

reasonable break time for nursing mothers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting Working 

5 Moms Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REASONABLE BREAK TIME FOR NURSING MOTH7 ERS. 

8 Section 13(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 

9 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘sections 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2122 IS

1 6 (except section 6(d) in the case of paragraph (1) of this 

2 subsection) and 7’’ and inserting ‘‘sections 6 and 7 (except 

3 sections 6(d) and 7(r) in the case of paragraph (1) of this 

4 subsection)’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1805 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to establish a program to recognize 

farms that have been in continuous operation for 100 years. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2017 

Mr. MURPHY (for himself and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to establish a program to recognize farms that have been in continuous 

operation for 100 years. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Century Farms Act 

5 of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that— 

8 (1) the United States has a long history of 

9 farming and has historically appreciated the invaluVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:21 Sep 16, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1805.IS S1805

SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1805 IS

1 able contribution of farming to domestic and global 

2 populations; 

3 (2) family farms represent 97 percent of all 

4 farms in the United States, of which 90 percent are 

5 small family farms; 

6 (3) over 30 States have established Century or 

7 Centennial Farm designations and awards; and 

8 (4) agricultural producers perform a vital public 

9 service that should be recognized and rewarded. 

10 SEC. 3. CENTURY FARMS PROGRAM. 

11 The Secretary of Agriculture (referred to in this sec12 tion as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall establish a program under 

13 which the Secretary recognizes any farm that— 

14 (1) a State department of agriculture or similar 

15 statewide agricultural organization recognizes as a 

16 Century Farm; or 

17 (2)(A) is defined as a farm or ranch under sec18 tion 4284.902 of title 7, Code of Federal Regula19 tions (as in effect on the date of enactment of this 

20 Act); 

21 (B) has been in continuous operation for at 

22 least 100 years; and 

23 (C) has been owned by the same family for at 

24 least 100 consecutive years, as verified through 

25 deeds, wills, abstracts, tax statements, or other simiVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:21 Sep 16, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1805.IS S1805

SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1805 IS

1 lar legal documents considered appropriate by the 

2 Secretary. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the amended Annual Report of USCorp (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Dultz, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Robert Dultz


Robert
      Dultz


Chief
      Executive Officer


Date:
      December 30, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF POST PROPERTIES, INC. FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000903127
<NAME> POST PROPERTIES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      15,381,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                   2,010,947,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             211,658,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,846,765,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    709,435,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<COMMON>                                       342,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 923,678,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,846,765,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            68,962,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,402,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,349,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             22,310,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         15,290,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                15,290,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>                            
                                                             EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statement Form S-3 No. 33-71574 of Sport Supply Group, Inc. and 
in the related Prospectus and in the Registration Statements on  
Form S-8  No. 33-42056, 33-48514, 33-64470, 33-80028, 333-27191, 
and 333-27193 of our report dated November 6, 1998 with respect to  
the consolidated financial statements of Sport Supply Group, Inc. 
included in this Form 10-K for the year ended October 2, 1998.


                                   ERNST & YOUNG, LLP

Dallas, Texas
November 23, 1998


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report dated January 29, 1997, with respect 
to the consolidated financial statements of Sport Supply Group,
Inc. (the "Company") included in this Form 10-K for the year ended
November 1, 1996, into the previously filed Registration Statement
Form S-3, No. 33-71574 of the Company and in the related Prospectus
and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8, File Nos. 33-42056, 
33-48514, 33-64470, 33-80028, 333-27191, and 333-27193.  It should 
be noted that we have not audited any financial statements of the 
Company subsequent to November 1, 1996 or performed any audit 
procedures subsequent to the date of our report.

                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Dallas, Texas,
November 23, 1998