alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001011733
<NAME> TRIMOL GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,493
<SECURITIES>                                       519
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,882
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (802)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,447
<PP&E>                                           5,104
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,308
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,016
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,868
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    56
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    126
<INCOME-TAX>                                        62
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       128
<EPS-BASIC>                                       $.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.01


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Ross Systems, Inc. (the "Company") Annual Report on Form
10-K/A for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, , J. Patrick Tinley,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: April 30, 2004

                                           /s/ J. Patrick Tinley
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           J. Patrick Tinley
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 21  Cephalon, Inc. Subsidiaries  Name
  
  Jurisdiction of IncorporationAnesta Corp.
  
  DelawareAnesta AG
  
  SwitzerlandArana Therapeutics, Inc.
  
  CaliforniaArana Therapeutics Pty.
  Ltd.
  
  AustraliaArana Therapeutics (Vic)
  Pty. Ltd.
  
  AustraliaCephalon (Bermuda)
  Limited
  
  BermudaCephalon Borinquen, Inc.
  
  Puerto RicoCephalon B.V.
  
  The NetherlandsCephalon Development
  Corporation
  
  DelawareCephalon France SAS
  
  FranceCephalon Europe SAS
  
  FranceCephalon GmbH
  
  GermanyCephalon Holdings Limited
  
  United KingdomCephalon International
  Holdings, Inc.
  
  DelawareCephalon Investments, Inc.
  
  DelawareCephalon Italia S.r.L
  
  ItalyCephalon Limited
  
  United KingdomCephalon Luxembourg
  S.a.r.l
  
  LuxembourgCephalon Pharma ApS
  
  DenmarkCephalon Pharma
  (Ireland) Limited
  
  IrelandCephalon Pharma SL
  
  SpainCephalon Sp.z.o.o.
  
  PolandCephalon Technologies
  Partners, Inc.
  
  DelawareCephalon Technology, Inc.
  
  DelawareCephalon Titrisation
  
  FranceCephalon (UK) Limited
  
  United KingdomCephalon Ventures
  Puerto Rico, Inc.
  
  DelawareCIMA LABS INC.
  
  DelawareEast End Insurance Ltd.
  
  BermudaPolaRx
  Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
  
  DelawarePromics Pty. Ltd.
  
  AustraliaSociete Civile
  Immobiliere Martigny
  
  FranceZeneus Pharma S.a.r.l.
  
  France
An equal opportunity employer 1220 L Street, Northwest Russell White Washington, DC 20005

- 4070 Health Sciences Manager

Tel 202

- 682

- 8344

Fax 202

- 682

- 8270 whiter@api.org

January 7 , 2014

Byron J. Bunker, Division Director Compliance Division Office of Transportation and Air Quality US Environmental Protection Agency

2000 Traverwood Drive

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105

RE: CAA Section 211(b) Fuels and Fuel Additives Health Effects Testing Regulation (Docket No.

A

- 90

- 07) : First Draft Report and Comment Checklist for

- Metabolism a nd Pharmacokinetic s

o f Diisopropyl Ether In Male a nd Female Rats: Pilot Study , 2 4 March 2013 (RTI Study Cod e; Rt05

- 934 )

Dear Mr. Bunker :

T he American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG), is submitting the following information to EPA as partial fulfillment of the CAA Section 211(b) Alternative Tier 2 requirements of the testing regulation:

 First Draft Report for

- M etabolism a nd Pharmacokinetics o f Diisopropyl Ether In

Male a nd Female Rats: Pilot Study, 24 March 2013 (RTI Study Code; Rt05

- 934)

 Comment Checklist containing the comments of the outside peer

- reviewers and quality assurance personnel and the study director’s proposed responses to their

comments.

Once EPA has provided their review and comments, all the necessary changes to the repor t will be made and a second draft report prepared for EPA’s final review.

T he se documents are being submitted to you at the EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Compliance Division, as part of the requirements of Clean Air Act Section 211(b)(2) and 211(e) . If you require further information or have any questions regarding this submission, please contact me.

Regards,

Russell D. White

Encl (2 ): First Draft Report for

- Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics o f Diisopropyl Ether In Male

a nd Female Rats: Pilot Study, 24 March 2013 (RTI Study Code; Rt05

- 934)

Comment Checklist containing the comments of the outside peer

- reviewers and quality assurance personnel and the study director’s proposed responses to their comments.

Cc: Joe Sopata, EPA (via email)
#### DAVEY v. W. G. HECHT, Inc.

No. 8964.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Jan. 11, 1933.

S.L. Gill, of Raymondville, for appellant.

A. B. Crane and J. G. Poster, both of Ray-mondville, for appellee.

SMITH, J.

This action was brought by W. G. Hecht, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, against Bess Davey, to recover the amount of a note executed by the latter and payable to the former. The corporation recovered as prayed for against Bess Davey and the sureties upon her replevy bond in an ancillary attachment proceeding. Bess Davey has appealed.

Appellant does not deny the execution of the note, or claim any lack or failure of-consideration therefor, or question the amount claimed to be due and recovered thereon. She simply defended, upon the ground that appellee was a foreign corporation engaged in business in Texas without a permit therefor from the state, as provided by familiar statutes.

We conclude that the asserted defense was not available to appellant, for the reason, .if no other, that the evidence shows, and the trial judge found the fact to be, that the transaction was one clearly within interstate commerce, entitling appellee to maintain its. suit' thereon in the courts of this state.

The ease has some queer angles to it, both in the facts of the transactions involved as-well as in the proceedings to recover thereon. But this court will not concern itself with those immaterial incongruities, since they cannot control over the material facts-that appellant concededly executed the note in favor of appellee for a valuable consideration fully performed.

*276 The note was given as consideration for an automobile. The evidence seems to point almost conclusively to the fact that W. G. Hecht individually was the owner of the car and personally sold it to appellant, taking in payment therefor appellant’s note payable to “W. G. Hecht, Inc.” During the progress of the suit, Hecht, the individual, sought to intervene and substitute himself as plaintiff and recover upon the note. The court refused to allow the intervention, but Hecht does not complain thereat, and is not before this court, and appellee is not in a position to complain; and as Hecht chose that method of securing himself in the transaction, he should be bound by it.

Appellant complains that judgment was rendered against the sureties on her replevy bond, although they were not made formal parties to the suit. Such formality was not necessary under the statute. Article 302, R. S. 1025.

Regardless of the grotesque features of the proceedings, substantial justice has been administered, and the judgment is affirmed.
NO. 07-08 -009 0-CR IN THE CO UR T OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL D APR IL 1, 2008

_________

_________

_________

___ BEA U JACKSON FUQUA, APPE LLA NT

V. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, APPEL LEE

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 10 0 T H DI ST RI CT COU RT OF CA RS ON COU NT Y; NO . 359 4; H ON ORABLE JOH N FO RB IS, JU DG E

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. ON A BA TEMENT A ND R EMA ND Appel lan t Be au J ack son Fuqua, appeal s h is co nv icti on for ag g ra v ated sex ual ass aul t and punish ment of 29 y ears in the I nst it uti onal D iv is ion of the Tex as Dep artment of Cr imi nal Ju sti ce. The c ler k’ s record w as filed on M ar ch 21, 2 008. The cl er k’ s record does not cont ain a certif ication bythe trial court of app ellant ’s ri g ht of appea l under

Tex as Rul e of

Appell ant Pro cedure 25.2(d ). Rul e 25 re q uires the t ri al cour t t o ent er

su ch a c erti ficat ion “ each ti me i t en te rs a j u d gment of g uil t or othe r appeal abl e order .” Tex . R . Ap p. P . 25. 2( a) (2 ).2

Con seq uentl y , w e abat e thi s a ppeal and re mand t h e c a u se t o the tr ial co urt for further proceed ing s. On re mand, t he tr ial co urt s hal l uti li z e w hatev er means nec ess ar

y to sec ure a C erti ficat ion of Defendant ’s Ri g ht of Appe al in compl ian ce w it h Tex as Rul e of Appel lat e Procedu re 25.2 (d ), reg ardin g appel lan t’ s a p peal of the t ri al cour t’ s j udg ment. Onc e ex ecut ed, t he c erti ficat ion shal l be i ncl uded i n a s uppl emental cl er k’ s record and filed w it h thi s C our

t on or before Apr il 30, 2008. It is so ordered.

Per C ur iam

Do not p ubl is h.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,690
<SECURITIES>                                     8,273
<RECEIVABLES>                                      129
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,316
<PP&E>                                              93
<DEPRECIATION>                                      24
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,201
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,120
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,396
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,425)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,425)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,425)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of David A. Box, Appellant. Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 4, 1990, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed and charged him with a recoverable overpayment of benefits.

Although claimant argues to the contrary, the record offers ample support for the conclusion that claimant was actively engaged in his own business and was therefore not totally unemployed for the entire period for which he received benefits. The fact that he may have still been seeking work as an employee is irrelevant *(see, Matter of Schreiber [Lubin] 5*AD2d 745). Furthermore, the overpayments made to claimant *730were properly recoverable under Labor Law § 597 (4) *(see, Matter of Council [Roberts],*132 AD2d 437).

Decision affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Casey, Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
#### DORN et al. v. EVES.

No. 3331.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

June 8, 1938.

Rehearing Denied June 22, 1938.

Aldredge, Shults- & Madden, of Dallas, and Duff & Cecil, of Beaumont, for appellants.

Mallott & Koonce, of Houston, and Ren-fro & Keen, of Beaumont, for appellee.

O’QUINN, Justice.

Action by appellee Eves against appellants, S. B. Dorn, Philtop Oil & Gas Company, a corporation, and others, for damages for alleged breach of drilling obligations in an oil and gas lease. Appellants, Dorn and Philtop Oil & Gas Company, answered by pleas of privilege to be sued in the counties of their respective residence. Controverting affidavits were filed, and on hearing the pleas of privilege were overruled. From that judgment appellants have prosecuted their appeal to this court.

We sustain appellants’ proposition that appellee failed to plead by his controverting affidavit and to establish by his evidence the necessary venue facts to maintain his venue in Jefferson County. Jefferies v. Dunklin, Tex.Sup., 115 S.W.2d 391. We *479do not review the controverting affidavit and the evidence because appellee concedes error; in his brief he says: “Wherefore, Appellee prays that the judgment of the lower Court be set aside and that this cause be remanded, and for such other and further relief as this Honorable Court may deem proper herein.”

The judgment of the lower court is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.
04/07/201 0 10:0 3 FA X 585276235 3 GOV T RELATION S S I 0-100407 -

PRESIDEN T Joe l Scligma n 24 0 Watli s Hal l Rochester . N Y 14627001 1 58S.275.8356 , 58S.256.247 3 fax sengmandffldiester.ed u 

# ^ROCHESTE R

Apri l 1,201 0 Th e Honorabl e R» y LaHoo d Secretar y U.$ . Departmen

t o f Transportatio n Washington . D.C . 2059 0 Th e Honorable J . Randolph Babbit t Administrato

r Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue . S

W Washington , D.C . 20$9 1 Docke t No . i Dea r Secretai y LaHood an

d Administrator

Babbitt : A s Presiden

t o f on e of th e top privat

e employer s i

n Ne w Yor

k Stat e an d one of the nation' s leadin g privat e universitie s wit

h thousand s of

students , faculty , staf

f an d administrator s tha

t frequentl y us e the Greate

r Rocheste r Internationa

l Airport , I a

mconcerne d abou

t the proposed transactio n betwee n Delt aAirline s an

d U S Airway s an

d the impac

t thi s woul d hav e o n travel to an

d fro mWashingto

n Nationa l Airpor t an d Ne w Yoric' s LaGuardi aAirport . Whil e averag e airfare s i

n th e Rocheste

r region hav e decrease d fro

mbein g amon

g the highes t

i n the nation . Rocheste

r traveler s to an

d fro mRonal d Reaga n Nationa l Airport , i n particular , continue t o experienc e exorbitan

t airfare s tha

t ca n sometime s exceed SIOO

O fo r around-tri

p flight . Althoug

h trave l betwee n Rocheste

r and Dulle s Internationa

l Airport , a s wel l a s betwee n Rocheste

r an d Baltimore/Washingto

n Internationa

l Airport , ca

n b e les s expensive , i t

i s not the mos t convenien t o r conducive fo

r conducting busines s i

n th e Washington , D.C . area . Tha t i s wh y I strongly suppor

t the Departmen

t o f Transportation' s recen

t decision (Docke

t No . PAA-2010-0109 ) to requir

e anumbe r o f slot s b e mad

e availabl e t o new entrant s an d limited incumben

t carrier s unde

r the propose d transactio n betwee n Delt aAirline s an

d US Airways . Competition wil l give traveler s bette

r service , lowe

r fares , an d bette r access . I t will als o facilitat

e economi c growt

h b y attracting ne

w businesse s an

d helpin g creat

e jobs . A strong , competitiv e airlin e industr y i s a04/07/201 0 10.0 3 FA X 585276235 3 GOV T RELATION S 810-100407-01 4

Th e Honorabl e Ra y LaHoo d Th e Honorabl e J . Randolp h Babbi u April . 1,201 0 Pag e Tw o significan t publi c benefi t

tha t wil l hel p u s continu e t o strengthe n th e University' s economi c footprin t i n th e region . I f

th e propose d transactio n wer e approve d withou t thes e conditions , i t

woul d lea d t o further consolidation , limite d access , an d increase d fares . I urg e yo u t o uphol d th e Orde r an d than k

yo u fo r you r consideratio n o f

thi s request . Sincerely , 

# q ?k X ie)»-5/rvK , JoefSeligma n Presiden t JS/p s cc : Th e Honorabl e Louis e M . Slaughte r
Exhibit 10.2: Engagement Letter - Jefferson Thachuk (6/12/2008).




Exhibit 10.2
 

Jeff Thachuk

1120 Martin St.

White Rock, BC

V4B 3V7

June 12, 2008



InsightfulMind Learning, Inc.

#300-1055 W. Hastings St.

Vancouver, BC

V6E 2E9



Re: Letter of Engagement for Fiscal 2009



Dear Board of Directors:

This letter is to confirm my understanding of the terms and objectives of my engagement as Chief Executive Officer of InsightfulMind Learning, Inc. (the “Corporation”).

Since the Corporation’s inception, as Chief Executive Officer, I have been responsible for the general design and development of the business, including business direction, and all editorial work. I shall continue with this responsibility. Additionally, since inception, I have been responsible for the overall administration of the Corporation, and I shall continue with this responsibility as well.

I report directly to the Board of Directors, and submit to them, for their review and approval, designs and plans covering all aspects of the Corporation’s business direction and development, as well as its administration.

As Chief Executive Officer, I dedicate approximately 10 hours per week to the business of the Corporation and shall continue to do so. As part of the Corporation’s Internal Control Plan, I submit to the Board of Directors, for their review and approval, summaries and details of the time I spend performing my duties.

To serve as Chief Executive Officer, for compensation, on April 22, 2005, I was granted 75,000 employee stock options at an exercise price of $0.15 per share.

Sincerely,

By:  JEFF THACHUK

       Jeff Thachuk

       Chief Executive Officer

       InsightfulMind Learning, Inc.

 






ACCEPTED by the Board of Directors of InsightfulMind Learning, Inc., June 12, 2008:

 

 

	
By:  JEFF THACHUK 

       Jeff Thachuk

	
By:  RAVEN KOPELMAN 

       Raven Kopelman




 



 

	
By:  KEN BOGAS 

       Ken Bogas

	
By:  DAVE HOLMES 

       Dave Holmes
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3
(Nos. 333-108320, 333-112541, 333-122418 and 333-134464) and Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-43716,
33-71920, 333-02888, 333-69591, 333-89909, 333-87421, 333-52640, 333-43104, 333-89228,
333-89230, 333-106112, 333-106115, 333-118611, 333-134462, 333-134463, 333-147374 and 333-155210) of
Cephalon, Inc. of our report dated February 23, 2009, relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
February 23, 2009

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1333 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1333

  To amend chapter 40 of title 18, United States Code, to exempt the 
    transportation, shipment, receipt, or importation of explosive 
  materials for delivery to a federally recognized Indian tribe or an 
   agency of such a tribe from various Federal criminal prohibitions 
                        relating to explosives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2009

 Mr. Grijalva introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend chapter 40 of title 18, United States Code, to exempt the 
    transportation, shipment, receipt, or importation of explosive 
  materials for delivery to a federally recognized Indian tribe or an 
   agency of such a tribe from various Federal criminal prohibitions 
                        relating to explosives.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF THE TRANSPORTATION, SHIPMENT, RECEIPT, OR 
              IMPORTATION OF EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS FOR DELIVERY TO A 
              FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBE OR AN AGENCY OF SUCH A 
              TRIBE FROM VARIOUS FEDERAL CRIMINAL PROHIBITIONS RELATING 
              TO EXPLOSIVES.

    Section 845(a)(3) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``to any agency of the United States or to any State or any 
political subdivision thereof'' and inserting ``to any agency of the 
United States, to any State or any political subdivision thereof, or to 
any federally recognized Indian tribe or agency thereof''.
                                 <all>
```