alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION*
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of
operations of the Corporation and its subsidiaries.
 /s/ Bruce D. Parker
    
    /s/ Ray L. DruseikisBruce D. Parker
    
    Ray L. DruseikisChairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
    
    Vice President of Finance and Controller;Interim Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
SecretaryDated: May 12, 2008
    
    Dated: May 12, 2008
 
 *
    
    This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certification
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Corporation
specifically incorporates this certification by reference into any such filing. 31
<page>			            EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Select L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter Davis,
President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner
of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.





By:	  /s/	Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	       President

Date:		March 31, 2009
### ELECTRONIC RECORD
COA # 03-14-00722-CR OFFENSE: 22.02 

## STYLE: Mark Frugev. The State ofTexas COUNTY: Travis 

# OV3-/fc 

# 0¥¥-/fc

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 331st District Court DATE: 12/3/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: D-l-DC-13-200256



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

# OV3-/6 a ¥5"- it* STYLE: Mark Fruge v. The State ofTexas Petition CCA#: 

## PRO S£ CCADisposition: FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE: 

## fce/v*^ JUDGE: 

# DATE: £>s/fiW*OM JUDGE: IIILt#U**-* SIGNED: PUBLISH: PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: ELECTRONIC RECORD
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 136 (Wednesday, July 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 41597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16775]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary

Bureau of International Labor Affairs; Labor Advisory Committee 
for Trade Negotiations and Trade Policy

ACTION: Notice of postponement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Labor Advisory 
Committee for Trade Negotiation and Trade Policy has been postponed 
until further notice. This meeting, which was closed to the public, was 
to be held on July 7, 2014, from 10:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. at the U.S. 
Department of Labor, Secretary's Conference Room, 200 Constitution Ave. 
NW., Washington, DC.
    The original Federal Register notice announcing this meeting was 
published on June 18, 2014, at 79 FR 34786.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Anne M. Zollner, Chief, Trade Policy 
and Negotiations Division; Phone: (202) 693-4890.
    Signed at Washington, DC, the 3rd day of July, 2014.

Carol Pier,
Deputy Undersecretary, International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014-16775 Filed 7-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-28-P
```
Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation of our report dated December 3, 2004, on
the financial statements of ADDvantage Technologies Group, Inc. (the "Company")
as of September 30, 2004 and 2003, and for each of the three years in the period
ended September 30, 2004, included in this Form 10-K Annual Report of ADDvantage
Technologies Group, Inc., into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File number 333-110645) and Form S-3 (File number
333-120035).


                                    /s/ TULLIUS TAYLOR SARTAIN & SARTAIN LLP


Tulsa, Oklahoma
December 22, 2004
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132035 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132035 COA: 268245 Lenawee CC: 02-009793-FC CORDALL R. NEAL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 16, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

THE DELAWARE AUCTIONEERS §

ASSOCIATION, § No. 456 , 201 6

§

Plaintiff

- Below, §

Appellant

, §

§ Court Below:

v. §

§ Superior Court of the

DELAWARE REAL ESTATE § State of Delaware

COMMISSION, §

§ C.A. No. N15C

- 04

- 012

Defendant

- Below, §

Appellee

. §

Submitted: February 15 , 201 7

Decided: February 16 , 201 7

Before STRINE , Chief Justice; HOLLAND and VALIHURA

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 16 th day of February 2017 , the Court, having considered this matter on the

b riefs of the parties, has concluded that the same should be affirmed on the basis of and for

the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its decision of August 10, 2 016.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the

Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
#### TENNON v. STATE.

No. 19943.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 15, 1938.

Percy Foreman, of Houston, for. appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of whisky under a retailer’s permit to sell wine and beer; penalty assessed at confinement in the county jail for five days.

The complaint and information appear regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

Nothing has been perceived in the record which would justify a reversal of the judgment. It is therefore affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 23 The Manager and Member
DaimlerChrysler Services North America LLC: We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-106332) on Form S-3 of CARCO Auto Loan Master Trust (the Trust) of our
report dated March 12, 2004, relating to the statements of assets, liabilities
and equity arising from cash transactions of the Trust as of December 31, 2003
and 2002, and the related statements of cash receipts and disbursements for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which
report appears in the December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of the
Trust. Our report dated March 12, 2004 contains an explanatory paragraph stating that
the financial statements were prepared on the basis of cash receipts and
disbursements, which is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  /s/ KPMG LLP Detroit, Michigan
March 15, 2004
Assignment Agreement among IBM, ADVO, Inc. and Valassis



 Exhibit 10.2 
  

			
	 ASSIGNMENT
	  	



 Whereas, International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) and ADVO, Inc.
(“ADVO”) entered into 1) Information Technology Services Agreement, dated July 16,1996, 2) NetWorkstation Management Services Agreement, dated April 1, 1998 and 3) Server Farm Management Services Agreement, dated July 21,
1999 ( collectively “the Agreements”); 
 Whereas, ADVO, Inc. is now a subsidiary of Valassis Communications,
Inc.(“Valassis”); 
 Whereas, ADVO, Valassis and IBM desire an assignment of the agreements from ADVO to Valassis: 
 Wherefore, ADVO, Valassis and IBM agree as follows: 
 ADVO hereby assigns all of its rights and delegates all of its duties under the Agreements to Valassis and Valassis hereby assumes all of the duties and liabilities arising under the Agreements effective as of August 1, 2007. IBM
hereby consents to and accepts and agrees to such assignment and delegation. 
 Effective August 1, 2007, the Parties agree that the name
“ADVO, Inc.” “ADVO”, or “Valassis” hereinafter shall mean “Valassis Communications, Inc.” wherever those terms are used in the Agreements. 
  

							
	Accepted by:	 	Accepted by:
	ADVO, Inc.	 	International Business Machines Corporation
				
	By:	 	 /s/ William F. Hogg Jr.
	 	By:	 	 /s/ Richard J. Sammon

		 	 Authorized Signature
	 		 	Authorized Signature
				
		 	 William F. Hogg Jr.
	 		 	 Richard J. Sammon

		 	 Name (Type or Print)
	 		 	Name (Type or Print)
				
		 	 Date: 8/13/07
	 		 	Date: 8/15/07

  

			
	Accepted by:
	Valassis Communications, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ William H. Blackmer

		 	 Authorized Signature

		
		 	 William H. Blackmer

		 	 Name (Type or Print)


 Date: 
  


			
	Letter of Assignment         Valassis / ADVO / IBM Confidential	 	Page 1 of 1
#### BUTLER MOTOR CO. v. NEIMEYER.

No. 12753.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

Jan. 7, 1933.

Wheat & Wheat, of Seymour, for appellant.

L. C. Counts, of Olney, for appellee.

LATTIMORE, Justice.

This cause is an appeal from the order of the trial court denying appellant the privilege to be sued in Baylor county, its residence. Appellee alleges a trespass committed in Archer county by appellant wrongfully seizing appellee’s automobile.

Appellant sold appellee an automobile, receiving some cash and a note secux-ed by a mortgage on said automobile. This note and mortgage appellant sold with his indorsement to the Universal Credit Company and appel-lee made several payments to that company. Appellee defaulted some of his payments and all unpaid balance was due in July, 1931, at which time appellee claimed he made an oral arrangement with appellant that he (appellee) would pay $50 in August and $75 in September on the note, and that appellant “would carry it four or five months.” These payments were made by appellee direct to the Universal Credit Company. On October 6, 1931, appellant Butler, acting on instructions from and as agent for the Universal Credit Company, sent Garlington to the home of ap-pellee, who, appellee being absent, on the instructions of appellee’s father, took the car, which was in charge of appellee’s wife, who delivered the keys to Garlington. *(*

The mortgage gave by its terms to the owner thereof the right to take possession of the car upon any default in payments of any of the installments of this note. This is a valid power. Singer Mfg. Co. v. Rios, 96 Tex. 174, 71 S. W. 275, 60 L. R. A. 143, 97 Am. St. Rep. 901. The appellee relies on his oral agreement with appellant. At that time Butler did not own the note and appellee knew that he did not, and no attempt is made to show that Butler had any authority from the Universal Credit Company to make any such agreement.

The Universal Credit Company, long prior to October 6th and after the $75 payment, advised appellee that “the balance on his note was due.” It had a right to send its agent, even though it be Butler’s employee Garlington, to get the car in such manner as the evidence shows it was gotten.

It is thus apparent that as far as the holder of the note and mortgage and Butler as his agent are concerned, there was no' wrongful taking of the car.

Whether there be an action against Butler for breach of his personal agreement is not before us; but if there be such action, it is at Butler’s residence.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions that the cause be transferred to Baylor county.
February 22, 2011 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-25466 

Mr. Robert Kneisley 

Southwest Airlines 

1901 L Street NW., Suite 640 

Washington, DC 20036 

Dear Mr. Kneisley: 

On September 26, 2008, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) granted Southwest 

Airlines (Southwest) an exemption from § 121.391(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR). Exemption No. 9382A allowed Southwest to substitute a qualified 

crewmember for one required flight attendant crewmember during boarding at all stops and 

to reduce the number of required flight attendants on board during the deplaning of 

passengers at all stops, subject to certain conditions and limitations. This exemption 

terminated on September 30, 2010. 

On the date the exemption was scheduled to terminate, the FAA was actively engaged in 

rulemaking regarding revisions to crewmember requirements when passengers are onboard 

an airplane. The FAA found it appropriate to extend the exemption while rulemaking efforts 

were completed. Therefore, in a letter dated September 24, 2010, the FAA extended the 

termination date of Exemption No. 9382A to September 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded 

or rescinded. 

On November 5, 2010, the FAA published a final rule (Crewmember Requirements When 

Passengers are Onboard) regarding crewmember requirements when passengers are onboard 

an airplane, which became effective January 4, 2011 (75 FR 68189) (copy enclosed). The 

final rule substantially addresses the relief granted in Exemption No. 9382A. Therefore, the 

FAA is rescinding Exemption No. 9382B on April 29, 2011. 
2

A copy of this letter will be placed onto the docket (Docket No. FAA-2006-25466). 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service 

Enclosure
exv10w4







	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.4




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated effective May 21, 2003
(the “Agreement”), by and between Quanta Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(“Employer”), and John R. Wilson (“Employee”), is hereby entered into this 6th day
of November, 2008.



     WHEREAS, Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations
promulgated thereunder (collectively, “Section 409A”) require that payments of nonqualified
deferred compensation to “specified employees” be delayed for six months from “separation from
service” (as those terms are defined under Section 409A);



     WHEREAS, Employee is currently identified as a “specified employee” in accordance with
Section 409A;



     WHEREAS, the Agreement provides for the payment of certain severance benefits upon termination
of service, which may be considered nonqualified deferred compensation subject to Section 409A; and



     WHEREAS, Employer and Employee desire to amend the terms of the Agreement to comply with
Section 409A.



     NOW, THEREFORE, Employer and Employee agree as follows:



     1. A new paragraph (f) is added to Section 6 of the Agreement to read as follows:




     “(f) Compliance with Section 409A of the Code. Notwithstanding any
other provision to the contrary, if the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Employer (the “Committee”) determines in its discretion
that severance payments due under this Agreement constitute “nonqualified deferred
compensation” subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the “Code”), and that the Employee is a “specified employee” as
defined in Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code and the regulations and other
guidance issued thereunder, then such severance payments shall commence on the first
payroll date of the seventh month following the month in which the Employee’s
termination occurs (with the first such payment being a lump sum equal to the
aggregate severance payments the Employee would have received during the prior
six-month period if no such delay had been imposed). For purposes of this
Agreement, whether the Employee is a “specified employee” will
be determined in accordance with the written procedures adopted by the Committee
which are incorporated by reference herein.”



 - 1 -









 





     2. Any provisions of the Agreement not specifically amended herein shall remain in full force
and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto set their hand the day and year first above written.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	EMPLOYER:



Quanta Services, Inc.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ DARREN B. MILLER
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Darren B. Miller 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Vice President – Information

Technology and Administration 	 
	 
	 	EMPLOYEE:

 	 
	 	/s/ JOHN R. WILSON
 	 
	 	John R. Wilson 	 
	 





 - 2 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND THE NOTES
THERETO, WHICH MAY BE FOUND ON PAGES 2 THROUGH 6 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         7,453
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,422
<PP&E>                                         90,073
<DEPRECIATION>                                 25,231
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 319,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,169,477
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       426
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,076,376)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   319,576
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               246,915
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  60,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               587,031
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             31,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (400,224)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (431,270)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,700)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (432,970)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.12)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                              AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE

                                       TO

                           CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT

                  This Amendment Number One is made to the Change in Control
Agreement by and between Post Properties, Inc., or "Post", and
_____________________, or "Executive";

                  WHEREAS, Post and Executive previously entered into a Change
in Control Agreement; and

                  WHEREAS, Post and Executive desire to adopt this Amendment
Number One to correct two typographical errors in Executive's Change in Control
Agreement;

                  NOW, THEREFORE, Post and Executive hereby agree as follows:

                                   Section 1.

                  The reference to " Section 1.2(e)" in the introduction to the
definition of the term "Cause" in Section 1.2 of Executive's Change in Control
Agreement shall be corrected to refer " Section 1.2(d)".

                                   Section 2.

                  The figure "1.40%" in Section 2(a)(4)(c) of Executive's Change
in Control Agreement shall be corrected to "140%."

                                   Section 3.

                  The corrections made in this Amendment Number One to
Executive's Change in Control Agreement shall be effective retroactive to the
date Executive's Change in Control Agreement was executed.

                                   Section 4.

                  This Amendment Number One may be executed in counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one and the same Amendment Number One.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Post and Executive have executed this
Amendment Number One to Executive's Change in Control Agreement this __ day of
____, 2002.

                                              POST PROPERTIES, INC.

                                              BY: ______________________________

                                              EXECUTIVE

                                              __________________________________

<PAGE>

SCHEDULE: EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WITH AMENDMENTS NO. 1 TO CHANGE IN CONTROL
AGREEMENTS

Janet M. Appling
Sherry W. Cohen
John D. Hooks
Jane S. Maddox
John B. Mears
Sheila James Teabo
Thomas L. Wilkes

                                      -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                             49,469
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      69,387
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                        67,149
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  320,395
<PP&E>                          1,023,901
<DEPRECIATION>                    391,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,734,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             772,266
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                           375
<COMMON>                           10,120
<OTHER-SE>                       (166,047)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,734,058
<SALES>                         6,137,315
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                6,137,315
<CGS>                           1,752,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   4,162,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  608,610
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                108,396
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (494,987)
<INCOME-TAX>                        1,393
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (493,654)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (512,321)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.15)



</TABLE>