alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.25b    
    


Exclusivity Agreement  


We
are writing to verify that Shanghai No.1 Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. ("SBPC", registrar's office address is 387 Shangqiu Road, Shanghai 200080, China; and factory address is
1317 Jianchuan Road, Shanghai 200240) agrees to exclusively sell Hyaluronidase pharmaceutical active ingredient from bovine origin (the "Raw Material") to Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
("Amphastar") and Amphastar agrees to purchase the Raw Material only from SBPC, provided SBPC can supply the Raw Material: 



	i)
	on
time, i.e., shipping out the Raw Material in 90 days after a purchase order is issued;



	ii)
	meet
the quality requirement of the Raw Material as the attached specifications;



	iii)
	supply
the required amount that is forecasted one year earlier. 




SBPC
specializes in production of the Raw Material from the bovine testes. Amphastar intends to purchase the Raw Material to manufacture Hyaluronidase Injection USP to be approved by the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration (FDA). SBPC further agrees to supply quality raw material that satisfies the attached specifications and Amphastar commits to purchase the Raw Material from SBPC by mutually agreed
price and amount. 


The
term of this agreement is 7 years and renewable, from the date of the FDA's approval of Amphastar's Hyaluronidase Injection application. 


By
signing this agreement, both parties agree to keep all business conducted strictly confidential. This agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of California. 



	Representative of

Shanghai No. 1 Biochemical and

Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.	 	Representative of

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
	 	 	 	 
	Signature: /s/ SHEN CAIDE	 	Signature: /s/ TONY KWAN
	 	 	 	 
	Printed Name:	 	Printed Name: Tony Kwan
	 	 	 	 
	Title: Manager of International Trade Department	 	Title: Director, Exec. Office
	 	 	 	 
	Date: 5.3.2004	 	Date: 3/24/2004













QuickLinks


Exhibit 10.25b
II 

Calendar No. 141 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 214 

[Report No. 115–105] 

To authorize the expansion of an existing hydroelectric project. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2017 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself and Mr. SULLIVAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

JUNE 13, 2017 

Reported by Ms. MURKOWSKI, without amendment 

A BILL 

To authorize the expansion of an existing hydroelectric 

project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERROR LAKE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT 

4 UPPER HIDDEN BASIN DIVERSION. 

5 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 214 RS

1 (1) COMMISSION.—The term ‘‘Commission’’ 

2 means the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 

3 (2) TERROR LAKE HYDROELECTRIC

4 PROJECT.—The term ‘‘Terror Lake Hydroelectric 

5 Project’’ means the project identified in section 1325 

6 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation 

7 Act (16 U.S.C. 3212), and which is the Commission 

8 project numbered 2743. 

9 (3) UPPER HIDDEN BASIN DIVERSION EXPAN10 SION.—The term ‘‘Upper Hidden Basin Diversion 

11 Expansion’’ means the expansion of the Terror Lake 

12 Hydroelectric Project as generally described in ex13 hibit E to the Upper Hidden Basin Grant Applica14 tion dated July 2, 2014, and submitted to the Alas15 ka Energy Authority Renewable Energy Fund 

16 Round VIII by Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. 

17 (b) AUTHORIZATION.—The licensee for the Terror 

18 Lake Hydroelectric Project may occupy not more than 20 

19 acres of Federal land to construct, operate, and maintain 

20 the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Expansion without fur21 ther authorization of the Secretary of the Interior or 

22 under the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation 

23 Act (16 U.S.C. 3101 et seq.). 

24 (c) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—The Upper Hidden Basin Di25 version Expansion shall be subject to appropriate terms 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 214 RS

1 and conditions included in an amendment to a license 

2 issued by the Commission pursuant to the Federal Power 

3 Act (16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.), including section 4(e) of that 

4 Act (16 U.S.C. 797(e)), following an environmental review 

5 by the Commission under the National Environmental 

6 Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 141 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 214 

[Report No. 115–105] 

A BILL 

To authorize the expansion of an existing 

hydroelectric project. 

JUNE 13, 2017 

Reported without amendment 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Monthly Maintenance Log Book
EXHIBIT 10.38

BANK OF BOSTON


June 27, 1996

Mr. Gary Klocek
Controller
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.
250 Rittenhouse Circle
Bristol, PA 10997

Dear Gary:

The First National Bank of Boston is pleased to confirm that we hold available 
for Jones Apparel Group, Inc. a $35,000,000 364-day uncommitted letter of credit
facility to extend through July 7, 1997.

The availability of borrowings under this facility is subject to (i) our usual
reservation that we continue to be satisfied with the affairs of Jones Apparel 
Group, Inc.; (ii) the execution of documentation for this facility that is 
satisfactory to the Bank and (iii) any changes in government regulations or 
monetary policy.

If the foregoing is satisfactory, please execute and return the enclosed copy
of this letter.


                                               Very truly yours,
                                               THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BOSTON

                                               By /s/ Nancy E. Fuller

                                               Nancy E. Fuller, Director

Accepted:
Jones Apparel Group, Inc.

By /s/ Gary R. Klocek, Controller

Date: Aug. 5, 1996





             THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BOSTON, Boston, Massachusetts 02106
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6448

LARRY DONNELL GAITHER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN PENDER; J. S. CLARK,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-96-45-5)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Donnell Gaither, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Gaither v. Pender, No. CA-96-45-5 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30902]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 2, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Cynthia C. Goodwin, Vice 
President) 104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Milstar Financial, Inc., Miami Beach, Florida; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 46.04 percent of the voting shares of 
First Western Bank, Cooper City, Florida.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Phillip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Comerica Incorporated, Detroit, Michigan; to merge with Imperial 
Bancorp, Inglewood, California, and thereby indirectly acquire voting 
shares of Imperial Bank, Inglewood, California. Comerica also has 
applied to acquire an option to acquire up to 19.9 percent of Imperial 
Bancorp.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 30, 
2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-30902 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
hme10q3qex101.htm


    Exhibit
10.1

     

    Home
Properties, L.P.

    Amendment
No. Ninety-Seven to

    Second
Amended and Restated

    Agreement
of Limited Partnership

     

    


    The
Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Home Properties,
L.P. (the “Partnership Agreement”) is hereby amended effective August 13, 2008
to substitute the “Schedule A” attached hereto for the “Schedule A” currently
attached to the Partnership Agreement.  “Schedule A” is hereby amended
to reflect various changes.

    


    GENERAL
PARTNER

    Home
Properties, Inc.

    


    


    /s/ Ann M. McCormick                

    Ann M.
McCormick

    Secretary

    


    


    LIMITED
PARTNERS LISTED ON ATTACHED SCHEDULE A

    By: Home
Properties, Inc.

          as
attorney-in-fact

    


    


    /s/ Ann M. McCormick                

    Ann M.
McCormick

    Secretary
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Post Properties, Inc.
(Post) and Post Apartment Homes, L.P. (PAH, and together with Post, the
Registrants) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Post and Post GP
Holdings, Inc., PAHs general partner, certifies that:  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Registrants. /s/ David P. Stockert

David P. StockertPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 9, 2004
 -57-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND
THE RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001011977
<NAME> ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,039
<SECURITIES>                                     2,569
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,946
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (895)
<INVENTORY>                                         73
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,541
<PP&E>                                         121,938
<DEPRECIATION>                                (67,030)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,288
<BONDS>                                        123,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (69,349)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,063
<SALES>                                         17,613
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,613
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,892
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,420
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,783
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,783
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,500)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       283
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 23(b)

             CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP., INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the use of our report dated August 8, 1996, except for Notes 6 and
13, as to which the date is August 23, 1996, with respect to the cosolidated
financial statements of Amerv Healthcare, Inc. Included in this annual Report on
Form 10-K of Stat Multi Care Services, Inc. And to the incorporation by
reference into the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-20865, 
333-08499, 333-05177, 333-06063 and 33-59056) of Star Multi Care Services, Inc.

Ernest & Young LLP.

San Diego, California
September 11, 1998

                                     -36-
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-3148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec. 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on October 24, 1999, High 
Standard Products, 1100 W. Florence Avenue, #B, Inglewood, California 
90301, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methaqualone (2565)........................  I
Lysergic acid diethylamide (7315)..........  I
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............  I
3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (7400).......  I
3,4-Methylenedioxy-N-ethylamphetamine        I
 (7404).
3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (7405)...  I
4-Methoxyamphetamine (7411)................  I
Heroin (9200)..............................  I
3-Methylfentanyl (9813)....................  I
Amphetamine (1100).........................  II
Methamphetamine (1105).....................  II
Secobarbital (2315)........................  II
Phencyclidine (7471).......................  II
Cocaine (9041).............................  II
Codeine (9050).............................  II
Hydromorphone (9150).......................  II
Diphenoxylate (9170).......................  II
Hydrocodone (9193).........................  II
Methadone (9250)...........................  II
Morphine (9300)............................  II
Fentanyl (9801)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to manufacture analytical reference standards.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the proposed registration.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than April 10, 2000.

    Dated: February 2, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-3148 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1


                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We  consent to the incorporation of our report dated December 12,
2002  on  the  financial  statements of  ADDvantage  Technologies
Group,  Inc.  as of September 30, 2002, and for the  years  ended
September 30, 2002 and 2001, included in this Form 10-KSB  Annual
Report of ADDvantage Technologies Group, Inc. as of September 30,
2002,  into ADDvantage Technologies Group Inc.'s previously Filed
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-12641).


/S/ Tullius Taylor Sartain & Sartain LLP

January 9, 2003
v131577_ex10-1 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    
      Exhibit
        10.1
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARY SUNDBERG,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 09-70538

Tax Ct. No. 16635-07

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from a Decision of the

United States Tax Court

Submitted December 14, 2010** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Mary Sundberg appeals pro se from the tax court’s order dismissing her

petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction under 26

U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo. Abrams v. Comm’r, 814 F.2d 1356,

1357 (9th Cir. 1987) (per curiam). We affirm.

FILED

DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-70538

The tax court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction because

Sundberg was never issued a Notice of Deficiency or a Notice of Determination. 

See 26 U.S.C. §§ 6213(a), 6330(d); Abrams, 814 F.2d at 1357 (holding that a prefiling notification letter from the Internal Revenue Service was not a Notice of

Deficiency, and therefore, the tax court had no jurisdiction over the taxpayer’s

petition). 

Sundberg’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. 

AFFIRMED.
#### NEWARK SHOE STORES, Inc., v. LOEB.

No. 2135.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Oct. 22, 1931. †

*368Crook, Lefler, Cunningham & Murphy, of Beaumont, for appellant.

Benckenstein & Benckenstein, of Beaumont, for appellee.

†

 Received for publication March 22, 1932.

WALKER, J.

(after stating the facts as above).

 The evidence raised the issue, and in support of the court’s judgment we conclude, that appellee did furnish to appellant all the space covered by its lease, and put appellant in’ due possession thereof and never at any time authorized Vener to disturb appellant’s possession. We further conclude that Vener took possession of the rear room either with appellant’s consent or under circumstances sufficient to sustain a finding that it consented to and acquiesced in the possession. We further conclude that when Vener took a second lease from appellee he was holding the rear room as tenant at will of appellant, and since appellee had not put him in possession of this room he owed appellant no duty to evict him. We further conclude that it was the intention of appellee, in executing to Vener the second lease, to lease to him the identical property, and only the identical property, covered by’ the original lease, and by the use of the words “being the same space now occupied by the said lessee and which has been occupied by the said lessee during the last five years” appellee referred to and described the property held by Vener under him and did not intend to include the property held by Vener as tenant at will of appellant. This construction gives effect to the intent of the parties, as testified to by appellee, and does not conflict with the specific description of the property as being 61⁄2 feet wide from north to south.

 From the conclusions stated it follows that appellant abandoned the leased premises without just cause and, therefore, having wrongfully breached its contract with appellant, must account to him for all damages suffered which, under the pleadings and proof, was the amount of rent for the unexpired portion of the contract. This was the amount assessed by the court in its judgment.

The judgment of the lower court is, therefore, in all things affirmed.
JEFFERY SCOTT SEWARD, 

SR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1415

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 1, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

Jeffery Scott Seward, Sr., pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WINOKUR, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.