alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11.1   Statement Re: Computation of Net Loss Per Share and Pro Forma Net
               Loss Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                         Three Months
                                                                        Ended March 31,
                                                              ---------------------------------
                                                                 1997                  1996
                                                              -----------           -----------

<S>                                                            <C>                      <C>    
Weighted average common shares
    outstanding                                                10,432,475               474,115

Effect of convertible preferred stock
    converted at date of issuance                                       -             7,531,157

 Effect of common equivalent shares issued 
    by the Company during the twelve
    month period immediately preceding 
    the Company's initial public offering in
    June 1996, as if they were outstanding 
    for all periods presented prior to 
    June 30, 1996 (using the treasury stock                             -               190,331
    method)
                                                              -----------           -----------

Shares used in computing net loss per
    share and pro forma net loss per share                     10,432,475             8,195,603

Net loss                                                      $(2,695,313)          $(2,361,260)

Net loss per share and pro forma net loss 
    per share                                                 $     (0.26)          $     (0.29)


</TABLE>



                                    Page 12
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### April 26, 2010 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. JESUS ADOLFO TINAJERO-PORRAS, Defendant - Appellant. No. 09-6292 (D.C. Nos. 09-CV-00473-R and 06-CR-00115-R-1) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Before KELLY , McKAY , and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.
Defendant-Appellant Jesus Tinajero-Porras, a federal inmate appearingpro

se , seeks to appeal from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Because Mr. Tinajero-Porras has not made “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right,” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), we deny his request for a certificate of appealability (“COA”) and dismiss the appeal. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000). A jury convicted Mr. Tinajero-Porras on drug charges arising out of a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine and 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana and he was sentenced to 30 years’- 2 - imprisonment. United States v. Tinajero-Porras , 275 F. App’x. 794, 795 (10th Cir. 2008). In his § 2255 motion, he primarily argued that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. On appeal, he argues that counsel was ineffective based on failing to object, argue, and preserve the following points: (1) the four-point enhancement for being a leader/organizer lacks a factual basis, (2) the drug quantities used were in error, (3) there was no evidence he laundered money, (4) the two-point enhancement for a firearm was not supported by the evidence, and (5) cumulative error. He also objects to the district court’s practice of striking his reply brief because it was not timely filed within 11 days. 1 R. 230. To obtain a COA, Mr. Tinajero-Porrras must show “that jurists of reason could disagree with the district court’s resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003). To establish ineffective assistance of counsel, Mr. Tinajero-Porras was required to prove deficient performance and prejudice. Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). Having reviewed the pleadings including the government’s responses and the Pre-Sentence Report, 1 R. 94-156, 181-204, and the district court’s resolution of Mr. Tinajero-Porras’ claims, we are satisfied that he cannot meet this standard. 1 R. 165-71, 207-09, 230 (noting that the result would not be altered even had the court considered the reply brief).- 3 - We deny a COA and DISMISS the appeal.

Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
Exhibit 32.1

GUARDIAN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Guardian Technologies International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael W. Trudnak, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: May 13, 2005

Signed:   /s/Michael W. Trudnak



Name: Michael W. Trudnak

Title: Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 190 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.190

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen

                                 An Act

 
 To provide for consideration of the extension under the Energy Policy 
and Conservation Act of nonapplication of No-Load Mode energy efficiency 
  standards to certain security or life safety alarms or surveillance 
                    systems, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Power And Security Systems (PASS) 
Act''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NONAPPLICATION OF NO-LOAD MODE ENERGY EFFICIENCY 
STANDARD TO CERTAIN SECURITY OR LIFE SAFETY ALARM OR SURVEILLANCE 
SYSTEMS.
    (a) Section 325(u)(3)(D)(ii) of the Energy Policy and Conservation 
Act (42 U.S.C. 6295(u)(3)(D)(ii)) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``2015'' each place it appears and inserting 
    ``2021''; and
        (2) by striking ``2017'' and inserting ``2023''.
    (b) Section 325(u)(3)(E) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act 
(42 U.S.C. 6295(u)(3)(E)) is amended--
        (1) in clause (ii), by striking ``July 1, 2017,'' and inserting 
    ``the effective date of the amendment under subparagraph (D)(ii)''; 
    and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(iv) Treatment in rule.--In the rule under 
            subparagraph (D)(ii) and subsequent amendments the 
            Secretary may treat some or all external power supplies 
            designed to be connected to a security or life safety alarm 
            or surveillance system as a separate product class or may 
            extend the nonapplication under clause (ii).''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>


                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated April 8, 1997 accompanying the consolidated 
financial statements included in the Annual Report of National Quality Care, 
Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1997. We hereby consent to 
the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements 
of National Quality Care, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-03622, 333-06175, 
333-14839, 333-21911, 333-25955, 333-32287, 333-34703, 333-45145, 333-46967, 
and 333-49059).



SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP

Los Angeles, California
April 13, 1998
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1








                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
National Quality Care, Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this registration statements
(Nos. 333-03622, 333-06175, 333-14839, 333-21911, 333-25955, 333-32287,
333-34703, 333-45145, 333-46967, 333-49059, and 333-73413), on Form S-8 of
National Quality Care, Inc. of our report dated March 18, 2003, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of National Quality Care, Inc. and Subsidiary as of
December 31, 2001 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended, which report is
included in the December 31, 2001 and 2002 annual report on Form 10-KSB of
National Quality Care, Inc.



/s/ Moss Adams LLP

Los Angeles, California
June 12, 2003
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

This certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely in connection with Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code, Failure of corporate officers to certify financial reports, and
is not being filed as part of MBNA Corporations Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003
accompanying this certification.

I, Bruce L. Hammonds, Chief Executive Officer of MBNA Corporation, certify that MBNA Corporations
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MBNA Corporation.

|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 15, 2004 |  | /s/ Bruce L. Hammonds  
|                     |  |                        
|                     |  | Bruce L. Hammonds      
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations found on pages 2, 3 and 4 of the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         742,797
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       36
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    147,536
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               909,930
<PP&E>                                         155,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,159,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          197,154
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,060
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     582,402
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,159,394
<SALES>                                        202,891
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               202,891
<CGS>                                           78,638
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,638
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               372,693
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (21,147)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (269,587)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (269,587)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
!function(e){"use strict";"function"==typeof define&&define.amd?define(["jquery","./version"],e):e(jQuery)}((function(e){"use strict";return e.ui.safeBlur=function(n){n&&"body"!==n.nodeName.toLowerCase()&&e(n).trigger("blur")}}));
//# sourceMappingURL=safe-blur-min.js.map
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-4076 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NE-30-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Removal 0.0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 9 $ 0.00

Replacement 0.0 $ 0.00 $8,184 $8,184.00 9 $73,656.00

Install 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 9 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $73,656

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: This AD is not considered to be "significant"

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed

October 19 , 2023.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 23

- 00166

- CV

IN RE INVUM THREE, LLC , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 215th District Court Harris County, Texas T rial Co u rt Cause No. 2022

- 25654



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 9, 2023 , relator Invum Three, LLC filed a petition for writ of

m andamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court t o compe l the Honorable Elaine2

H. Palmer, presiding judge of the 215th District Court of Harris County

, to vacate the trial court’s January 17, 2023 amended temporary injunction

.
Relator has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. According ly, we d eny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Poissant.
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1345 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to eliminate the discriminatory treatment of the District of Columbia under 

the provisions of law commonly referred to as the ‘‘Hatch 

Act’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1345 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia 

3 Hatch Act Reform Act of 2009’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EMPLOYEES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TO BE 

5 SUBJECT TO THE SAME RESTRICTIONS ON 

6 POLITICAL ACTIVITY AS APPLY TO STATE 

7 AND LOCAL EMPLOYEES. 

8 (a) APPLICABILITY OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO

9 STATE AND LOCAL EMPLOYEES.—Section 1501(1) of title 

10 5, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘a State 

11 or territory’’ and inserting ‘‘a State, the District of Co12 lumbia, or a territory’’. 

13 (b) PROVISIONS RELATING TO FEDERAL EMPLOYEES

14 MADE INAPPLICABLE.—Section 7322(1) of such title is 

15 amended— 

16 (1) by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end of subpara17 graph (A); 

18 (2) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph 

19 (B); 

20 (3) by striking subparagraph (C); and 

21 (4) by striking ‘‘services;’’ and inserting ‘‘serv22 ices or an individual employed or holding office in 

23 the government of the District of Columbia;’’. 

24 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

25 The amendments made by this Act— 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1345 RFS 

1 (1) shall take effect on the effective date of a 

2 law, enacted by the government of the District of 

3 Columbia after the date of the enactment of this 

4 Act, which places restrictions on political activities of 

5 employees of the government of the District of Co6 lumbia; and 

7 (2) shall apply with respect to actions occurring 

8 on or after the effective date referred to in para9 graph (1). 

Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,497
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,546
<ALLOWANCES>                                       289
<INVENTORY>                                      1,784
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,753
<PP&E>                                          12,585
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,913
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,449
<BONDS>                                          3,886
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           17,641
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       147,367
<OTHER-SE>                                   (133,016)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,425
<SALES>                                         22,115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,115
<CGS>                                           11,481
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,511
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,113)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,113)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,113)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.19)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          38,864
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,457
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     17,504
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               119,054
<PP&E>                                         501,167
<DEPRECIATION>                                 223,511
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 426,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,104
<BONDS>                                         56,233
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           153
<OTHER-SE>                                     260,110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   426,122
<SALES>                                        122,872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,872
<CGS>                                           88,478
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,732
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,285
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,878
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,407
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,407
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
        

</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00477

- CV

IN RE LESLIE ANN TAY LOR

SCALES RELATOR

------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------ 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------ The court has considered relator’s petition for wri t of mandamus and is of
the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied, and the stay is lifted

.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, J.; LIVINGSTON, C

. J

. ; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: December 20 , 2012

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8 (d).
ACCEPTED 04-15-00046-CR FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 6/3/2015 3:52:34 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK
**Exhibit 31.4****CERTIFICATION**     I, Gregory W. Schafer, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Onyx Pharmaceuticals,Inc., certify that:**1.     **I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the“registrant”); and**2.     **Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport.        Dated: November 15, 2007 /s/ Gregory W. Schafer   Gregory W. Schafer   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer