alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations found on pages 2 and 3 of the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          46,616
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     83,530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,232
<PP&E>                                          80,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 252,820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          264,385
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           755
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10,810)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   252,820
<SALES>                                         14,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,074
<CGS>                                            7,594
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,323
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (335)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (105,178)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (105,178)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.014)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      No. 18.1**





June
      30,
      2008




Mr.
      Richard D. Kurtz


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


Advanced
      Photonix, Inc.


2925
      Boardwalk


Ann
      Arbor, MI 48104




Dear
      Mr.
      Kurtz:




As
      stated
      in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements of Advanced Photonix, Inc.
      (“the Company”) for the year ended March 31, 2008, the Company changed its
      amortization method from straight-line basis to an accelerated method based
      on
      expected cash flows for its Technology, Trademarks, Customer List and
      Non-Compete intangible assets. The Company believes that the change in
      amortization methodology from straight-line to cash-flow amortization is
      consistent with the definition in SFAS No. 154 “ *Accounting
      Changes and Error Corrections* ”
of
      a
      change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle.
      As
      stated in Note 4, the Company believes that the new accounting principle is
      preferable beginning in fiscal 2008 because it better reflects the pattern
      of
      consumption of the expected benefit of the intangible assets. In connection
      with
      our audit of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended March
      31,
      2008, we have evaluated the circumstances and the business judgment and planning
      which formulated your basis to make the above mentioned change in amortization
      method.





It
      should
      be understood that criteria have not been established by the Financial
      Accounting Standards Board for selecting from among the alternative accounting
      principles that exist in this area. Further, the American Institute of Certified
      Public Accountants has not established the standards by which an auditor can
      evaluate the preferability of one accounting principle among a series of
      alternatives. However, for purposes of the Company’s compliance with the
      requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are furnishing this
      letter.





Based
      on
      our audit, we concur with management’s judgment that the change in amortization
      method described in Note 4 is preferable in the circumstances. In formulating
      this position, we are relying on management’s business planning and judgment,
      which we do not find to be unreasonable.








Very
      Truly Yours,





/s/BDO
        Seidman, LLP
 BDO
      Seidman, LLP


Troy,
      Michigan
EX-10.55









Exhibit 10.55




ADOPTION OF MASTER AGENCY AGREEMENT




     This Adoption of Master Agency Agreement (“Adoption”) is effective as of November 1,
2008, between American Physicians Assurance Corporation (“Company”) and SCW Agency Group, Inc.
(“Agency”).



RECITALS




     Whereas, the Company and Agency are parties to a Master Agency Agreement effective as of
January 1, 2004 (“Agreement”); and



     Whereas, the Company and Agency desire to expand the coverage of the Master Agency Agreement
to include the State of Ohio as a Designated Market as defined in Section I.H. of the Master Agency
Agreement; and



     Whereas, the Master Agency Agreement provides that it shall apply to any market subsequently
added to the Agreement by execution of an Adoption Agreement, pursuant to Section IV.D. of the
Master Agency Agreement.



ADOPTION




     Now therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements below, the Company and
Agency hereby agree as follows:



     1. The term “Designated Market,” as defined in Section I.H of the Master Agency Agreement and
as used throughout that Agreement, shall include the State of Ohio. The State of Ohio shall not be
an “Exclusive Market” as defined in Section I.K. of the Master Agency Agreement.



     2. The parties hereby adopt all provisions of the Master Agency Agreement applicable to a
Designated Market to the State of Ohio.



     3. For purposes of Exhibit A to the Master Agency Agreement, the following Commission Rate
shall apply as of the Effective Date of this Agreement:



	 	 	 
	 	 	Commission Rates
	Designated Market	 	(percentage of gross written premium)
	Ohio

	 	New Business: ***%
	 

	 	Renewal Business: ***%
	 

	 	Tail Business: ***%








 




			
	***	 	Information redacted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and has been filed
separately.




1 of 2 









 










Exhibit 10.55




     Company and Agency have executed this Adoption Agreement by their duly authorized
representatives.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	COMPANY:	 	 	 	AGENCY:	 	 	 	 	 	 
	AMERICAN PHYSICIANS	 	 	 	SCW AGENCY GROUP, INC.
	ASSURANCE CORPORATION	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By: 

Its:

	 	/s/ R. Kevin Clinton
 

President & CEO
	 	 
	 	 By:

Its:
	 	/s/ Kristina M. Manoogian
 
 President	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Dated:

	10/14/2008
	 	 	 	Dated:
	 10/16/2008	 	 	 	 	 	 






2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 167 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.167

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
  To designate a National Memorial to Fallen Educators at the National 
                Teachers Hall of Fame in Emporia, Kansas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``National Memorial to Fallen 
Educators Act''.
SEC. 2. DESIGNATION.
    (a) In General.--The memorial to fallen educators located at the 
National Teachers Hall of Fame in Emporia, Kansas, is designated as the 
``National Memorial to Fallen Educators''.
    (b) Effect of Designation.--The national memorial designated by 
this section is not a unit of the National Park System and the 
designation of the National Memorial to Fallen Educators shall not 
require or permit Federal funds to be expended for any purpose related 
to that national memorial.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Form of Amendment to Incentive Award Agreement



 Exhibit 10.19 
  
 CARMAX, INC. 
  
 AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT 
  
 This Amendment to Stock Option Agreement, effective as of the      day of May, 2005, is made between CarMax, Inc. (the “Company”) and
                             (the “Optionee”), a non-employee director of the Company.

  
 The Company and the Optionee agree to amend the Stock Option
Agreement dated June 30, 2004 (the “Stock Option Agreement”) on the following terms: 
  
 1. Paragraph 3 of the Stock Option Agreement is hereby deleted and the following is substituted in its entirety therefor: 
  
 Option 
  
 You have been granted a non-statutory option (the “Option”) to purchase from the Company the following shares of common stock:

  

			
	Shares of CarMax, Inc. Common Stock:	  	4,003
	Option Price Per Share:	  	$21.49
	Date Fully Vested:	  	June 29, 2007

  
 A
portion of the Option relating to the right to purchase 1,300 shares of CarMax, Inc. common stock shall be subject to shareholder approval of the amendment to the Plan at the 2005 annual meeting of shareholders. 
  
 2. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Stock Option Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect and is hereby ratified and affirmed in all respects. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be signed by a duly authorized officer, and the Optionee has affixed his or her signature hereto. 
  

					
	CARMAX, INC.	 	OPTIONEE
			
	By:	 	  

	 	

	 	 	Keith D. Browning	 	[Optionee Name]
	 	 	Executive Vice President and	 	Director
	 	 	Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Edward M. Kaye, M.D., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., (the “Registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

| April 29, 2016 |   | /s/ Edward M. Kaye, M.D.                                                         |
|---------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   | Edward M. Kaye, M.D.                                                             |
|                |   | Interim Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President, Chief Medical Officer |
|                |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                                                    |
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

The undersigned  hereby  certify,  to the best of their  knowledge,  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that:

1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Novoste  Corporation for the quarterly
     period ended June 30, 2002 as filed August 14, 2002 with the Securities and
     Exchange Commission,  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2.   The information  contained in the quarterly report fairly presents,  in all
     material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of
     Novoste Corporation.

     Date: August 14, 2002        s/ Thomas D. Weldon
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Thomas D. Weldon, Chief Executive Officer
                                  of Novoste Corporation

     Date: August 14, 2002        s/ Edwin B. Cordell, Jr.
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Edwin B. Cordell, Jr., Chief Financial Officer
                                  of Novoste Corporation





1489942
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      17,595,889
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  627,736
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,415,223
<PP&E>                                       4,399,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,635,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,816,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,402,356
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,055,961
<PREFERRED>                                 12,500,000
<COMMON>                                    73,722,923
<OTHER-SE>                                (47,953,091)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,816,431
<SALES>                                      1,009,822
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,009,822
<CGS>                                          762,924
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  762,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,140,149
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             174,990
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,906,354)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,906,354)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                 (12,873,126)
<NET-INCOME>                              (18,779,480)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.17)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Post Properties, Inc.
("Post") and Post Apartment Homes, L.P. ("PAH", and together with Post, the
"Registrants") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Post
and Post GP Holdings, Inc., PAH's general partner, certifies that:

      1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrants.

/s/ Christopher J. Papa
----------------------------
Christopher J. Papa
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
May 10, 2005
#### Kim E. Marsh, Appellant, v Central Datsun, Ltd., Defendant, and Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A. et al., Respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Doran, J.), entered February 20, 1990 in Schenectady County, which, *inter alia,*partially granted the motion of defendants Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A. and Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. for a protective order.

Supreme Court properly vacated the notices to take depositions of employees of defendant Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. in New York except as to allow plaintiff to examine the employees in Japan where they were located *(see, Ascona Cie., Anstalt v Horn, 32*AD2d 755). The court also properly determined that any such examinations would be at plaintiff’s own expense *(see, Bosurgi v Chemical Bank N. Y. Trust Co.,*30 AD2d 950). Finally, the application for the protective order was done in a timely manner *(see,*CPLR 3103).

Order affirmed, with costs. Kane, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made this sixth day of November
2008, between NVR, INC., a Virginia corporation (the “Company”) and DWIGHT C. SCHAR, (the
“Executive”). References within this Amendment to the Company refer to NVR and its subsidiaries
and affiliates.



WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend that Employment Agreement entered into between the Company and
the Executive date July 1, 2005, which was subsequently amended by Amendment No. 1 on December 21,
2006 and by Amendment No. 2 on November 6, 2007 (“Employment Agreement”); and



WHEREAS, Section 8.3 of the Employment Agreement states that amendments shall only be effectuated
pursuant to a written instrument signed by both parties to the Employment Agreement;



WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive find it desirous to execute an Amendment, whereby the
Executive’s base salary and bonus opportunity for calendar year 2009 is $0.



ACCORDINGLY, for and in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and agreement
set forth in this Amendment, the parties AGREE as follows:




	1.	 	Paragraph 3.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as
follows:






As compensation for all services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, the Company will pay
to the Executive an annual base salary of ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS
($1,500,000) payable in equal monthly installments of ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND
DOLLARS ($125,000). For calendar year 2009 only, (i) the Executive’s annual base salary is
equal to $0, and (ii) the Executive’s annual base salary for purposes of calculating any
payments due the Executive pursuant to Section 6 of the Agreement shall be deemed to be
$1,500,000, provided that the Company may make any adjustments to the Executive’s 2009 base
salary up to $1,500,000 to the extent necessary to avoid unintended consequences under the
Employment Retirement Income Security Act, the Internal Revenue Code, the Company’s benefit
plans or other similar laws and arrangements. The Company’s Board of Directors in its sole
discretion may increase, but may not reduce, the Executive’s annual base salary.




	2.	 	Except as expressly provided herein, the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement, as
amended, shall remain in full force and effect and shall be binding on the parties hereto.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed and delivered this Amendment, or have
caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered in their name and on their behalf,
intending to be legally bound by its terms, as of the day and year first above written.



NVR, INC.



	 	 	 
	By: /s/ Joseph H. Madigan

	 	/s/ Dwight C. Schar
	 

	 	 
	
 
	 	DWIGHT C. SCHAR
The Board of Directors
Chrysler Financial Company L.L.C.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-38873 and 33-55795) on Form S-3 of CARCO Auto Loan Master Trust (the
"Trust") of our report dated March 29, 2000, relating to the statements of
assets, liabilities and equity arising from cash transactions of the Trust as
of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related statements of cash receipts
and disbursements for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1999, which report appears in the December 31, 1999, annual
report on Form 10-K of the Trust.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Detroit, Michigan
March 29, 2000
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Surface Transportation Board

          - [Docket No. EP 552 (Sub-No. 28)]

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board.

# ACTION:

Notice of decision.

# SUMMARY:

On September 6, 2024, the Board served a decision announcing the 2023 revenue adequacy determinations for the nation's Class I railroads. Three Class I railroads (BNSF Railway Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., and Union Pacific Railroad Company) were found to be revenue adequate.

# DATES:

This decision is effective on September 6, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245-0333. If you require an accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act, please call (202) 245-0245.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under 49 U.S.C. 10704(a)(3), the Board is required to make an annual determination of railroad revenue adequacy. A railroad is considered revenue adequate under 49 U.S.C. 10704(a) if it achieves a rate of return on net investment (ROI) equal to at least the current cost of capital for the railroad industry. For 2023, this number was determined to be 9.87% in                     *Railroad Cost of Capital—2023,*                     EP 558 (Sub-No. 27) (STB served Aug. 7, 2024). The Board then applied this revenue adequacy standard to each Class I railroad. Three Class I carriers (BNSF Railway Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., and Union Pacific Railroad Company) were found to be revenue adequate for 2023.                

                    The decision in this proceeding is posted at                     *www.stb.gov.*

Decided: August 30, 2024.

By the Board, Board Members Fuchs, Hedlund, Primus, and Schultz.

Eden Besera,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2024-20210 Filed 9-6-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P