Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 6, 2000 / Notices 76223

Manufacturer/exporter Margin

(percent)

Hyundai ..................................... 3.77

Shinho ....................................... 1.38

SeAH ........................................ 0.98

Parties to the proceeding may request

disclosure within five days of the date

of publication of this notice. An

interested party may request a hearing

within 30 days of publication of these

preliminary results. See 19 CFR

351.310(c). Any hearing, if requested,

will be held 44 days after the date of

publication, or the first working day

thereafter. Interested parties may submit

case briefs and/or written comments no

later than 30 days after the date of

publication of this notice. Rebuttal

briefs and rebuttals to written

comments, which must be limited to

issues raised in such briefs or

comments, may be filed no later than 37

days after the date of publication.

Parties who submit arguments are

requested to submit with the argument

(1) a statement of the issue, (2) a brief

summary of the argument and (3) a table

of authorities. Further, we would

appreciate it if parties submitting

written comments would provide the

Department with an additional copy of

the public version of any such

comments on diskette. The Department

will issue a notice of the final results of

this administrative review, including

the results of its analysis of issues raised

in any such comments, within 120 days

of publication of these preliminary

results.

Assessment Rate

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b), the

Department calculates an assessment

rate for each importer of the subject

merchandise. Upon issuance of the final

results of this administrative review, if

any importer-specific assessment rates

calculated in the final results are above

de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent),

the Department will issue appraisement

instructions directly to the Customs

Service to assess antidumping duties on

appropriate entries by applying the

assessment rate to the entered value of

the merchandise. For assessment

purposes, we calculate importer-specific

assessment rates for the subject

merchandise by aggregating the

dumping margins for all U.S. sales to

each importer and dividing the amount

by the total entered value of the sales to

that importer.

Cash Deposit Requirements

To calculate the cash-deposit rate for

each producer and/or exporter included

in this administrative review, we

divided the total dumping margins for

each company by the total net value for

that company’s sales during the review

period.

Furthermore, the following deposit

requirements will be effective upon

completion of the final results of this

administrative review for all shipments

of standard pipe from Korea entered, or

withdrawn from warehouse, for

consumption on or after the publication

date of the final results of this

administrative review, as provided by

section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash

deposit rate for the reviewed companies

will be the rates established in the final

results of this administrative review,

except if the rate is less than 0.5 percent

and, therefore, de minimis, the cash

deposit will be zero; (2) for merchandise

exported by manufacturers or exporters

not covered in this review but covered

in the original less-than-fair-value

investigation or a previous review, the

cash deposit will continue to be the

most recent rate published in the final

determination or final results for which

the manufacturer or exporter received

an individual rate; (3) if the exporter is

not a firm covered in this review, the

previous review, or the original

investigation, but the manufacturer is,

the cash deposit rate will be the rate

established for the most recent period

for the manufacturer of the

merchandise; and (4) if neither the

exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm

covered in this or any previous reviews,

the cash deposit rate will be 4.80

percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate established

in the less-than-fair-value investigation.

See Notice of Antidumping Orders:

Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy

Steel Pipe from Brazil, the Republic of

Korea (Korea), Mexico, and Venezuela,

and Amendment to Final Determination

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:

Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy

Steel Pipe from Korea, 57 FR 49453

(November 2, 1992).

These cash deposit requirements,

when imposed, shall remain in effect

until publication of the final results of

the next administrative review.

Notification to Importers

This notice serves as a preliminary

reminder to importers of their

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)

to file a certificate regarding the

reimbursement of antidumping duties

prior to liquidation of the relevant

entries during this review period.

Failure to comply with this requirement

could result in the Secretary’s

presumption that reimbursement of

antidumping duties occurred and the

subsequent assessment of double

antidumping duties.

We are issuing and publishing this

administrative review in accordance

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of

the Act.

Dated: November 29, 2000.

Troy H. Cribb,

Assistant Secretary, for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 00–31105 Filed 12–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Submission for OMB Review;

Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

The Department of Defense will

submit to OMB for emergency

processing, the following proposal for

collection of information under the

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction

Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

Title and OMB Number: Personnel

Security Investigation Projection for

Industry Survey; OMB Number 0704–

[To Be Determined].

Type of Request: New Collection;

Emergency processing requested with a

shortened public comment period

ending December 11, 2000. An approval

date by December 15, 2000, has been

requested.

Number of Respondents: 242.

Responses Per Respondents: 1.

Annual Responses: 242.

Average Burden Per Response: 75

minutes.

Annual Burden Hours: 303.

Needs and Uses: Under the National

Industrial Security Program (NISP), the

Defense Security Service (DSS) is

responsible for personnel security

clearance investigations within

industry. The Defense Security Service

has used historical data for agency

budget projections.

This collection of information is

necessary to request the voluntary

assistance of a segment of the cleared

industry facilities to provide projections

of numbers and types of personnel

security investigations. This initial

effort will serve as the prototype for an

annual data collection from industry.

This information collection will only

address the largest cleared facilities that

account for a significant number of the

security clearances. The data would

become part of the total clearance

projections for industry to be included

in an automated database for use with

DSS budget submissions.

Affected Public: Business or Other

For-Profit.

76224 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 6, 2000 / Notices

Frequency: On Occasion.

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.

OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C.

Springer.

Written comments and

recommendations on the proposed

information collection should be sent to

Mr. Springer at the Office of

Management and Budget, Desk Officer

for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive

Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert

Cushing.

Written requests for copies of the

information collection proposal should

be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR,

1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite

1204, Arlington, VA 22202–4302, or by

fax at (703) 604–6270.

Dated: November 30, 2000.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00–31016 Filed 12–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–10–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy

Meeting of the Board of Visitors to the

U.S. Naval Academy

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Naval Academy

Board of Visitors will meet to make such

inquiry as the Board shall deem

necessary into the state of morale and

discipline, the curriculum, instruction,

physical equipment, fiscal affairs, and

academic methods of the Naval

Academy. During this meeting inquiries

will relate to the internal personnel

rules and practices of the Academy, may

involve on-going criminal

investigations, and include discussions

of personal information the disclosure

of which would constitute a clearly

unwarranted invasion of personal

privacy. The executive session of this

meeting will be closed to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on

Monday, December 11, 2000, from 8:30

a.m. to 11:45 a.m. The closed Executive

Session will be from 10:50 a.m. to 11:45

a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in

the Bo Coppedge Dining Room of

Alumni Hall at the U.S. Naval Academy.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lieutenant Commander Thomas E.

Osborn, Executive Secretary to the

Board of Visitors, Office of the

Superintendent, U.S. Naval Academy,

Annapolis, MD 21402–5000, telephone

number: (410) 293–1503.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

notice of meeting is provided per the

Federal Advisory Committee Act (5

U.S.C. App. 2). The executive session of

the meeting will consist of discussions

of information which pertain to the

conduct of various midshipmen at the

Naval Academy and internal Board of

Visitors matters. Discussion of such

information cannot be adequately

segregated from other topics, which

precludes opening the executive session

of this meeting to the public. In

accordance with 5 U.S.C. App. 2,

section 10(d), the Secretary of the Navy

has determined in writing that the

special committee meeting shall be

partially closed to the public because

they will be concerned with matters as

outlined in section 552(b)(2), (5), (6),

and (7) of title 5, U.S.C. Due to

unavoidable delay in administrative

processing, the normal 15 days notice

could not be provided.

Dated: November 29, 2000.

James L. Roth,

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate

General’s Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register

Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 00–31000 Filed 12–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EC00–136–000]

Madison Gas & Electric Company,

Wisconsin Public Service Corporation,

American Transmission Company,

LLC; Notice of Filing

November 30, 2000.

Take notice that on November 29,

2000, Wisconsin Public Service

Corporation (WPSC) tendered for filing

a request for clarification of the

Commission’s November 24, 2000, order

authorizing, inter alia, the disposition of

WPSC’s transmission facilities to

American Transmission Company LLC

(ATC LLC). The requested clarification

relates to whether the Commission’s

order encompassed the issuance of the

membership units in ATC LLC that are

related to the WPSC transmission

facilities, to a wholly-owned WPSC

subsidiary (WPS LLC). If the requested

clarification cannot be granted, then

WPSC alternatively requests

Commission authorization under

section 203 of the FPA to effectuate the

aspects of the transfer involving WPS

LLC.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest such filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426,

in accordance with Rules 211 and 214

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice

and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and

385.214). All such motions and protests

should be filed on or December 11,

2000. Protests will be considered by the

Commission to determine the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceedings. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection. This

filing may also be viewed on the

Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/

online/rims.htm (call 202–208–2222 for

assistance). Comments and protests may

be filed electronically via the internet in

lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR

385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions

on the Commission’s web site at http:/

/www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–31020 Filed 12–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP01–33–000]

Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice

of Application

November 30, 2000.

Take notice that on November 20,

2000, Northern Natural Gas Company

(Northern), 1111 South 103rd Street,

Omaha, Nebraska 68124, filed with the

Commission in Docket No. CP01–33–

000 an application pursuant to Section

7(b) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), to

abandon and remove certain pipeline

facilities and appurtenant equipment in

Dodge and Saunders Counties,

Nebraska, all as more fully set forth in

the application which is open to the

public for inspection.

Northern proposes to abandon and

remove approximately 2,200 feet of its

16-inch diameter A-Line at its Platte

River bridge crossing. Northern states

that the abandonment project begins in

northeastern Saunders County and ends

in southwestern Dodge County.

Northern also states that approximately

half of the A-Line to be abandoned lies

in Saunders County and the other half

lies in Dodge County. The A-Line runs

down the face of a 107-foot bluff on the

south side of the river crossing. Several