alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      19,415,764
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,541,284
<PP&E>                                       2,243,286
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,193,930
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,601,423
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,122,877
<BONDS>                                         14,370
<COMMON>                                        10,226
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,453,950
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,601,423
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,076,073
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,438,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,510,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,510,324)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,510,324)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.95)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2238 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2238

 To amend the Ohio & Erie Canal National Heritage Canalway Act of 1996 
                   to repeal the funding limitation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 2017

Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Portman) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Ohio & Erie Canal National Heritage Canalway Act of 1996 
                   to repeal the funding limitation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OHIO & ERIE NATIONAL HERITAGE CANALWAY.

    Section 810(a) of the Ohio & Erie National Heritage Canalway Act of 
1996 (Public Law 104-333; 110 Stat. 4275; 122 Stat. 826) is amended by 
striking the second sentence.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



The undersigned executive officer of ESB Financial Corporation (the
Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Charlotte A. ZuschlagCharlotte A. ZuschlagPresident and Chief Executive Officer




Date: March 11, 2005



Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to ESB Financial Corporation and will be retained by ESB Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

Sign-in Sheet- for Participants Attending and Not Speaking 

U.S. EPA Public Hearing on the 

Name 

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO AIR TOXICS STANDARDS AND 

NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR PORTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING 

[August 1 6, 201 2] • [Arlington, Texas] 

Affiliation I City I State E-mail I Telephone 

) 

Wish to be a Speaker? 

YIN 

Please Print or Write Legibly Page No.1 
No. 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

Sign-in Sheet- for Participants Attending and Not Speaking 

U.S. EPA Public Hearing on the 

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO AIR TOXICS STANDARDS AND 

NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR PORTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING 

[August 16, 201 2] • [Arlington, Texas] 

Name Affiliation I City I State E-mail/ Telephone Wish to be a Speaker? 

YIN 

fofl sha CuYYO" 

_fOV 

Please Print or Write Legibly Page No. 1 
No. 

104. 

105. 

106. 

107. 

110. 

111. 

11 3. 

114. 

11 5. 

11 6. 

Sign-in Sheet- for Participants Attending and Not Speaking 

U.S. EPA Public Hearing on the 

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO AIR TOXICS STANDARDS AND 

NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR PORTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING 

[August 16, 201 2] • [Arlington, Texas] 

Name Affiliation I City I State E-mail I Telephone Wish to be a Speaker? 

YIN 

~ Ct.~tk ~ 

f>C\)fcn.t) • t.J \4 

/J (L~)Nt:.>w ITx 

tV\ ~A-7 

Please Print or Write Legibly Page No. 9
exv10w3






Exhibit 10.3




AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO

CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is dated as of
July 29, 2008, by and between Exterran Holdings, Inc. (the “Company) and Norman A. McKay (“Executive”).



RECITALS:




     1. Hanover Compressor Company and Executive entered into a Change of Control Agreement dated
as of July 29, 2005 and Amendment No. 1 to Change of Control Agreement dated as of August 30, 2007
(as so amended, the “Agreement”).



     2. The Company has assumed Hanover Compressor Company’s obligations under the Agreement.



     3. The Company and Executive wish to amend the Agreement.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to, and hereby do, amend Section 11 of Annex I of the
Agreement to replace the phase “first anniversary of such Change of Control” with the phrase
“second anniversary of such Change of Control.”



     Except as otherwise expressly amended by this Amendment, the terms and provisions of the
Agreement are hereby confirmed and ratified and remain in full force and effect.



     The parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the date first set forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC.	 	 	 	EXECUTIVE
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ STEPHEN A. SNIDER
	 	 
	 	By:
	 	/s/ NORMAN A. MCKAY
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Stephen A. Snider
	 	 	 	 	 	Norman A. McKay
EXHIBIT 3.4



SECOND AMENDMENT TO

PRENTISS PROPERTIES
TRUSTS

AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS



This Second Amendment to Prentiss Properties Trusts Amended and Restated Bylaws (the Bylaws) hereby amends the Bylaws effective as of
May 15, 2003 in the following respects:



1. Article III,
Section 15 is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following language:



Section 15. NUMBER AND QUALIFICATIONS. The number of Trustees of the Trust shall not be less than five (5) nor more than nine (9).
The Trustees shall be classified, with respect to the terms for which they severally hold office, into separate classes, if and in the manner prescribed in the Trusts Declaration of Trust. At any regular meeting or at any special meeting
called for that purpose, at least 80% of the members of the Board of Trustees shall establish, increase or decrease the number of Trustees, provided that the number thereof shall never be less than required by Maryland law and further provided that
the tenure of office of a Trustee shall not be affected by any decrease in the number of Trustees. Trustees need not be shareholders of the Trust.



|Dated: May 15, 2003 |  | PRENTISS PROPERTIES TRUST
|------------------- |  | -------------------------
|                    |  |                          
|                    |  | By:                      
|                    |  | Name:                    
|                    |  | Title:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1858 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to empower the States to set the 

maximum annual percentage rates applicable to consumer credit transactions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself, Ms. WARREN, Mr. REED, Mr. MERKLEY, and 

Mr. SANDERS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to empower the States 

to set the maximum annual percentage rates applicable 

to consumer credit transactions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Empowering States’ 

5 Rights To Protect Consumers Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITS ON ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATES. 

7 Chapter 2 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

8 1631 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1858 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 140B. LIMITS ON ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATES. 

2 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the an3 nual percentage rate applicable to any consumer credit 

4 transaction (other than a residential mortgage trans5 action), including any fees associated with such a trans6 action, may not exceed the maximum rate permitted by 

7 the laws of the State in which the consumer resides.’’. 

Æ 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
#### GULF REFINING CO. v. WILLIAMS.

No. 4129.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

Jan. 27, 1932.

Rehearing Denied Eeb. 11, 1932.

*358Stone, Strickland & Caves, of Henderson, and John E. Green, Jr., of Houston, for appellant.

Carney & Carney, of Atlanta, for appellee.

LEVY, J.

(after stating the case as above).

Appellant presents the points on appeal as legal error that (1) the suit was upon a cause of action entirely against another and different corporation, and (2) the Workman’s Compensation Law of Louisiana (Act La. No. 20 of 1914 as amended) cannot be enforced in the courts of Texas. It is believed the evidence is not of weight and’sufficiency to warrant a cause of action or of liability against the Gulf Refining 'Company. We therefore conclude that the judgment should be reversed and judgment here rendered in favor of the appellant. The burden of proof was upon the appellee to establish identity of the corporation liable. The Gulf Refining Company was chartered under the laws of a different state from the Gulf Refining Company of Louisiana, and they were legally distinct and separate companies. The evidence affirmatively shows that the appellee was injured in his employment in the course of the business of his employer, the Gulf Refining Company of Louisiana. He was not employed by the Gulf Refining Company and that company was not his employer, and that company had not extended its operations to Louisiana. The evidence of the appellee is not inconsistent with the other evidence and circumstances when construed in the light of all the evidence. The company that was operating “on the Whemple Lease” was conclusively identified as the Gulf Refining Company of Louisiana. The written contract of employment of appellee was executed by the “Gulf Refining Company of Louisiana.” Although the pay checks were issued at “Houston, Texas,” yet they were signed by the “Gulf Refining Company of Louisiana” and payable by the bank at “Shreveport, Louisiana.” The Gulf Refining Company of Louisiana was the corporation shown to have complied with the Workman’s Compensation Law of Louisiana. See Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Graham, 12 Tex. Civ. App. 54, 33 S. W. 576; Proctor v. Wells Bros. Co., 262 Ill. 77, 104 N. E. 186, Ann. Cas. 1915B, 273.

As ruled in the ease of Proctor, supra, a general denial was a sufficient plea to raise the question of nonliability, as here presented, arising under the evidence offered in the trial.

The ruling upon the first point renders a ruling upon the second point entirely unnecessary.

The judgment is reversed and rendered for appellant.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 10.10

                                    AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                       WAVEPHORE, INC. 1997 INCENTIVE PLAN

         Effective as of February 10, 1997, WavePhore, Inc. (the "Company")
adopted the WavePhore, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). By this
instrument, the Company desires to amend the Plan to increase the number of
Common Shares of WavePhore available under the Plan.

         1. This Amendment shall amend only that Section specified herein and
those Sections not amended hereby shall remain in full force and effect.

         2. The second paragraph in Section 3 of the Plan, which sets forth the
number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Plan, is hereby amended and
restated in its entirety as follows:

                  Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 14 hereof, the
Committee may grant Options, Stand-Alone SARs, shares of Restricted Stock,
shares of Phantom Stock and Stock Bonuses under the Plan with respect to a
number of Common Shares that in the aggregate does not exceed 10,000,000 shares.
The maximum number of Common Shares for which Incentive Awards, including
Incentive Stock Options, may be granted to any one Participant shall not exceed
5,000,000 shares in any one calendar year; and the total of all cash payments to
any one Participant pursuant to the Plan in any calendar year shall not exceed
$5,000,000. The grant of an LSAR, Tandem SAR or Cash Bonus shall not reduce the
number of Common Shares with respect to which Options, Stand-Alone SARs, shares
of Restricted Stock, shares of Phantom Stock or Stock Bonuses may be granted
pursuant to the Plan.

         3. This Amendment shall be effective as of March 5, 1999. WavePhore,
Inc. has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized
representative on the 5th day of March, 1999.


                                       WAVEPHORE, INC.

                                       By /s/David E. Deeds
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                       David E. Deeds, Chairman,
                                       Chief Executive Officer and President

                                       79
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF GEOLOGICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC





CONSENT
OF GEOLOGICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of any reports concerning reserves and
other analyses performed by us in our capacity as an independent consultant to
USCorp (the “Company”), which are set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A and for the year ended September 30, 2010 and any registration
statements or prospectuses to be filed in connection with the sale or resale
from time to time of securities of the Company, or amendments or supplements
thereto; and in any amendment to any registration statements or
prospectuses.





We also
consent to the reference to us under the headings “Consultants” and “Experts” in
any of the aforementioned documents.




GEOLOGICAL
      SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC/S/ Robert CameronName:
      Robert CameronTitle:
      President
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 21

- 00497

- CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Hugo MARQUEZ

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 13

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 600721

Honorable Rosie S. Gonzalez , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED December 22, 2021.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez

, Chief Justice
**ONYX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.****EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Hollings C. Renton, Chairman of the Board, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the bestof his knowledge:**1.** The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and **2.** The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Reportand results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.Dated: November 9, 2005       /s/ Hollings C. Renton     Hollings C. Renton    Chairman of the Board, President    and Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13(a)-14(b) of the Exchange Actand Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350) has beenprovided to Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.“This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofOnyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective ofany general incorporation language contained in such filing.”
32
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AFG Enterprises USA, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We, Erich
Spangenberg, Chief Executive Officer and William P. Stelt, Chief Financial
Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 9, 2005                          By:/s/ Erich Spangenberg
                                                  ---------------------
                                                  Chief Executive Officer


                                               By:/s/ William P. Stelt
                                                  --------------------
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry Beatty, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a *684judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chetta, J.), rendered July 20, 1987, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and a new trial is granted.

The defendant brought a motion for summary reversal of his conviction after learning that the court stenographer was unable to locate her untranscribed notes which covered the entire trial. By order dated February 8, 1989, this court remitted the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a reconstruction hearing. The matter now returns to this court after the reconstruction hearing. We find that the defendant has met his burden of establishing that issues exist which cannot be properly evaluated based upon the record as reconstructed. Therefore, a new trial is ordered *(cf., People v Glass,*43 NY2d 283; *People v Johnson,*145 AD2d 572; *People v Suren,*131 AD2d 896). Bracken, J. P., Harwood, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.2.3


Ratification and Extension Agreement


          THIS Agreement is made and entered into
this 10th day of October, 2008, by and between Millennium Group Worldwide
Incorporated, a Florida corporation with its principal place of business at
2825 N. 10th Street, St. Augustine, Florida 32084 (“MGW”), and
FRANKLIN AUTO MALL, INC. d/b/a Champion Chevrolet, Buick, Potomac, GMC with a
principal place of business at 1201 Armory Drive, Franklin, Virginia 23851
(hereinafter referred to as “Franklin Auto”),


          WHEREAS,
MGW have entered into a joint venture agreement dated November 16th, 2007 (the
“Prior joint venture Agreement”); 


          WHEREAS,
the Prior joint venture Agreement (in the RECITALS) was conditioned upon MGW obtaining adequate funding
under its Form S-1 Registration, such period of time having already expired as
a function of the registration and review process;  


          WHEREAS,
both MGW and Franklin Auto, wish to ratify the Prior joint venture Agreement
and extend the period that will satisfy the Recitals Section, Paragraph 4 and
5c condition as to timing. 


          NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
1.

	
MGW and
  Franklin Auto hereby ratify the Prior Joint Venture Agreement in all
  respects; 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
2.

	
Recitals
  Section, Paragraph 5c relating to timing of funding is extended to no later
  than December 31, 2008,or immediately after the appropriate funding is available from
  the offering; and


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
3.

	
This
  Agreement, together with the Prior Joint Venture Agreement as hereby
  incorporated by reference, constitutes the entire understanding between the
  parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and no amendment or
  modification to this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon the parties
  unless made in writing and signed by each party.





          IN
WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date
first written above.






	
 

	
 


	
MILLENNIUM GROUP WORLD INCORPORATED


	
/s/ Julius
  Jackson, Sr

	
 


	


	
 


	
Julius
  Jackson, Sr, President

	
 





FRANKLIN AUTO, INC.


	
 

	
 


	
/s/ James
  Hayden

	
 


	


	
 


	
James
  Hayden, President