alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2064 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to include 

canned, dried, frozen, and pureed fruits and vegetables in the fresh 

fruit and vegetable program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2017 

Mr. JOHNSON (for himself, Mr. DONNELLY, Mr. YOUNG, and Ms. BALDWIN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to include canned, dried, frozen, and pureed fruits 

and vegetables in the fresh fruit and vegetable program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fruit and Vegetable 

5 Access for Children Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PROGRAM. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 19 of the Richard B. Rus8 sell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1769a) is 

9 amended— 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2064 IS

1 (1) in the section heading, by striking 

2 ‘‘FRESH’’; and 

3 (2) in subsections (a), (b), and (e), by inserting 

4 ‘‘, canned, dried, frozen, or pureed’’ after ‘‘fresh’’ 

5 each place it appears. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 14222(c) 

7 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (7 

8 U.S.C. 612c–6(c)) is amended— 

9 (1) in the subsection heading, by striking 

10 ‘‘FRESH’’; and 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘fresh’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>





                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we consent to the incorporation by 
reference in the registration statements of Ross Systems. Inc. on Forms S-8 
(File Nos. 33-42036, 33-48226, 33-58584, 33-72108, 33-89128, 333-36745 and 
333-44665) and Forms S-3 (File Nos. 33-89504, 333-19619, 333-06053, 333-44363 
and 333-47877) of our report dated August 17, 1998, on our audits of the 
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Ross 
Systems, Inc. as of June 30, 1998, and for the year ended June 30, 1998, which 
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
September 28, 1998
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 3, 2015

NO. 03

- 13

- 00286

- CV

Richard Patrick Fagerberg, Appellant

v.

Steve Madden, Ltd.; SXSW, Inc. and W3 Event Specialists, Inc., Appellee s

APPEAL FROM 261ST DISTRICT COUR T OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on March 15, 2013. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. A ppellant

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal , both in this Court and the court below.
Order entered September 2 1 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00243
- CV
COLLEEN MARIE FISHER , Appellant

V. PAUL M. COOKE, SR. , Appellee On Appeal from the 1 91st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 18
- 05882

O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s September 20, 2021 motion for extension of time to correct and file her brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received on September 20 filed as of the date of this order. We DENY appellant’s September 14, 2021 extension motion as moot.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
#### MAXWELL v. STATE.

No. 16212.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 28, 1934.

. J. T. Ranspot, of Mineral Wells, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for transporting intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

 There are seven hills of exception, each of which has been examined, - but none of which seem to present error, or to call for discussion. Appellant excepted to the court’s charge for its failure to submit the case on circumstantial' evidence. The state established by positive testimony that appellant transported two'packages wrapped in a newspaper from Lovers Retreat to the city of Palo Pinto, on the occasion in question, and that he drove in a car to Mr. Hale’s house; that he got out of the car with one of said packages — a square jar wrapped in a newspaper, with about two inches of the jar exposed — and carried it to Mr. Plale’s room in said house, reached in the room and set the package down near the head of the bed. A witness who was on the porch, near whom appellant carried the package, saw appellant drive up, saw him carry the package in the house and put it in said room, testified that as soon as appellant left he went at once to said room and got the package, which he saw appellant take out of the car and take to said room, unscrewed the lid from the jar, and said it was a half gallon jar plumb full of whisky. Witness saw and smelled it. This was positive testimony given before the jury. The fact that this witness on cross-examination made some answers favorable to' the appellant, such as that he could not say that the jar was not in there before appellant came, in nowise operated to prevent the testimony given by him from being positive and could but have been for the jury in passing on the credibility of the witness. On redirect examination the witness twice affirmed that the square jar containing the whisky which he saw in Hale’s room was the samé which appellant had when he passed witness on the porch. We think the trial court committed no error in declining to submit the case on circumstantial evidence.

The judgment will be affirmed.
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance





Exhibit 10.3




SIXTH AMENDMENT OF

AMENDED AND RESTATED PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT




This Sixth Amendment of the Amended and Restated Participation Agreement (the “Amendment”) is
made and entered into as of this 12th day of December, 2005, by and between Union Bank
and Trust Company, a Nebraska banking corporation and trust company, solely in its capacity as
trustee of various grantor trusts known as Short Term Federal Investment Trusts or other grantor
trusts (“Union Bank”) and National Education Loan Network, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Nelnet”).



WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into that certain Amended and Restated Participation
Agreement dated as of June 1, 2001, as amended (the “Agreement”), and the parties hereto wish to
amend the Agreement under the terms set forth herein.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants herein
contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:



1. Definitions. Unless otherwise expressly stated herein, capitalized terms in this
Amendment shall have the same meanings given to them in the Agreement.



2. Change in Definition of Nelnet’s Fee. For purposes of Section 1.03 of the
Agreement, Nelnet’s Fee shall be defined to equal the difference between (i) the total of interest
received with respect to such Eligible Loans contained in a participation certificate, and (ii) an
amount equal to 20 basis points (0.20%) above the average of the bond equivalent rates of the
quotes of 3-month commercial paper (financial) rates in effect for each of the days in such quarter
as reported by the Federal Reserve in Publication H-15 (or its successor) for the relevant 3-month
period, multiplied by the average aggregate principal balance of all Eligible Loans covered by said
participation certificate. With respect to those participation interests in Eligible Loans having
an average aggregate outstanding balance in excess of $200 million, Nelnet’s Fee shall be reduced
so as to replace 20 basis points (0.20%) in clause (ii) of the formula in the preceding sentence
with 6 basis points (0.06%). Payments shall be distributed on a monthly basis, on the first
business day of each month.



3. Effect of Amendment. This Amendment shall be effective as of the date first set
forth above. Unless expressly modified or amended by this Amendment, all terms and provision
contained in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect without modification.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Union Bank and Trust Company	 	National Education Loan Network, Inc.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Ken Backemeyer
	 	By:
	 	/s/ Jim Kruger
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	Senior Vice President
	 	Title:
	 	Controller
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1271 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 139
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1271

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 6, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             July 30, 2009

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 2351 West Atlantic Boulevard in Pompano Beach, Florida, as the 
              ``Elijah Pat Larkins Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIJAH PAT LARKINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2351 West Atlantic Boulevard in Pompano Beach, Florida, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Elijah Pat Larkins Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Elijah Pat 
Larkins Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 139

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1271

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 2351 West Atlantic Boulevard in Pompano Beach, Florida, as the 
              ``Elijah Pat Larkins Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 30, 2009

                       Reported without amendment
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,409,404
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,742,108
<ALLOWANCES>                                   175,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,225,208
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,278,496
<PP&E>                                       4,207,420
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,744,673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,855,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,774,547
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       296,773
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,512,529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,855,185
<SALES>                                     28,284,720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,284,720
<CGS>                                       12,877,318
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,877,318
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,565,412
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             206,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,777,200
<INCOME-TAX>                               (5,072,117)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,849,317
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,849,317
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**In connection with this quarterly report of RushEnterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven L. Keller, Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:**

** **

**1.**                                       The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

** **

**2.**                                       The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

** **

** **
|   | By:    | /S/ STEVEN L. KELLER                       |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Steven L. Keller                           |
|   | Title: | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Date:  | May 11, 2009                          |

** **

** **

**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

** **

----
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 214 

To authorize the expansion of an existing hydroelectric project. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2017 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself and Mr. SULLIVAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the expansion of an existing hydroelectric 

project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERROR LAKE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT 

4 UPPER HIDDEN BASIN DIVERSION. 

5 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

6 (1) COMMISSION.—The term ‘‘Commission’’ 

7 means the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 

8 (2) TERROR LAKE HYDROELECTRIC

9 PROJECT.—The term ‘‘Terror Lake Hydroelectric 

10 Project’’ means the project identified in section 1325 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 214 IS

1 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation 

2 Act (16 U.S.C. 3212), and which is the Commission 

3 project numbered 2743. 

4 (3) UPPER HIDDEN BASIN DIVERSION EXPAN5 SION.—The term ‘‘Upper Hidden Basin Diversion 

6 Expansion’’ means the expansion of the Terror Lake 

7 Hydroelectric Project as generally described in ex8 hibit E to the Upper Hidden Basin Grant Applica9 tion dated July 2, 2014, and submitted to the Alas10 ka Energy Authority Renewable Energy Fund 

11 Round VIII by Kodiak Electric Association, Inc. 

12 (b) AUTHORIZATION.—The licensee for the Terror 

13 Lake Hydroelectric Project may occupy not more than 20 

14 acres of Federal land to construct, operate, and maintain 

15 the Upper Hidden Basin Diversion Expansion without fur16 ther authorization of the Secretary of the Interior or 

17 under the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation 

18 Act (16 U.S.C. 3101 et seq.). 

19 (c) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—The Upper Hidden Basin Di20 version Expansion shall be subject to appropriate terms 

21 and conditions included in an amendment to a license 

22 issued by the Commission pursuant to the Federal Power 

23 Act (16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.), including section 4(e) of that 

24 Act (16 U.S.C. 797(e)), following an environmental review 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 214 IS

1 by the Commission under the National Environmental 

2 Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.2




Exhibit 10.2

BIOSANTE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.




DESCRIPTION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS




BioSante Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has entered into employment agreements with each of its executive officers, copies of which agreements have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as exhibits to BioSante’s annual report on Form 10-KSB. The following is a description of oral amendments to those employment agreements or additional oral compensation arrangements between BioSante and the following executive officers of BioSante:

 

	
Name of Executive Officer
	
 

Title
	
Base 

Salary
	
Bonus Arrangements
	
Stock 

Options
	
 

Other

	
Stephen M. Simes
	
Vice Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
	
$374,400 per year
	
See footnote (1) below
	
Stock options to purchase shares of BioSante common stock are granted from time to time in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee of the BioSante Board of Directors
	
Under the BioSante Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan, participants, including executive officers, may voluntarily request that BioSante reduce pre-tax compensation by up to 100% (subject to certain special limitations) and contribute such amounts to a trust. BioSante contributed an amount equal to 50% of the amount that each participant contributed under this plan. 

 

Executive officers receive other benefits received by other BioSante employees, including health, dental and life insurance benefits.

	
Phillip B. Donenberg
	
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary 
	
$198,640 per year
	
See footnote (1) below
	
See above
	
See above

	
Leah M. Lehman, Ph.D.
	
Vice President, Product Development
	
$249,600 per year
	
See footnote (1) below
	
See above
	
See above

	
Steven J. Bell, Ph.D.
	
Vice President, Research and Pre-Clinical Development
	
$166,400 per year
	
See footnote (1) below
	
See above
	
See above






	(1)  	Annual performance bonuses for BioSante’s executive officers are determined each year by BioSante’s Compensation Committee. On March 31, 2005, the Compensation Committee determined 2004 annual bonuses for BioSante’s executive officers. The following bonuses were awarded, payable in cash one-half on April 15, 2005 and the other one-half on January 1, 2006; provided, however, that the executive officer is still employed by BioSante on December 31, 2005 or if not employed as of such date was terminated by BioSante without cause: Mr. Simes ($120,000), Mr. Donenberg ($51,000), Dr. Lehman ($80,000) and Dr. Bell ($32,000).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000874389
<NAME> APPLIED EXTRUSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,279
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,056
<INVENTORY>                                     39,192
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,001
<PP&E>                                         332,946
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 370,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,040
<BONDS>                                        218,759
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,409
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   370,236
<SALES>                                        245,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               245,334
<CGS>                                          195,174
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  195,174
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                53,543
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   832
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,868
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,083)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (8,033)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,050)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          852
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,902)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.18)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-00-053]

# Agency Holding the Meeting: 

International Trade Commission.

# Time and Date: 

December 12, 2000 at 11 a.m.

# Place: 

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# Status: 

Open to the public.

# Matters to be Considered:

  

1. Agenda for future meeting: none.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-861 (Final) (Certain Expandable Polystyrene Resins from Indonesia)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on December 20, 2000.)

5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

Issued: November 30, 2000.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-31048  Filed 12-1-00; 2:39 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-M
#### SPENCER v. STATE.

No. 20069.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 4, 1939.

M. E. Gates, of Huntsville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for theft of cattle, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

The offense is properly charged. The record contains no statement of facts and no bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.