alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
                                                                     -------------------------------
                                                                       PRIMARY         FULLY DILUTED
                                                                        BASIS              BASIS
                                                                     -----------       -------------
<S>                                                                  <C>                <C>
A   Average Common Shares Outstanding                                  5,067,642          5,067,642
                                                                     -----------        -----------
    Common Stock Equivalents:
B   Average Stock Options Outstanding                                    616,342            618,106
C   Average Option Exercise Price                                        $12.391            $12.427
                                                                     -----------        -----------
D   Exercise Proceeds (B x C)                                         $7,637,390         $7,681,161
                                                                     -----------        -----------
E   Market Price for Shares Repurchased                                   $23.62             $29.25
F   Shares Repurchased at Market Price (D / E)                           323,399            262,604
                                                                     -----------        -----------
G   Increase in Common Shares (B - F)                                    292,943            355,502
H   Unallocated Shares in Employee Stock                                 133,819            133,819
    Ownership Plan Trust
                                                                     -----------        -----------
I   Shares Outstanding and Equivalents (A + G - H)                     5,226,766          5,289,325
                                                                     ===========        ===========
J   Net Income for Period                                            $11,338,000        $11,338,000
                                                                     ===========        ===========
    Earnings Per Share (J / I)                                             $2.17              $2.14
                                                                     ===========        ===========
    Market Price @ 12/31/96                                               $29.25
                                                                     ===========
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 238 (Monday, December 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 77386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31461]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR


Notice of Intent To Discontinue Preparation of an Environmental 
Assessment for the Conversion of a Portion of Strawberry Valley Project 
Water from Irrigation to Municipal and Industrial Use

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary--Water and Science, 
Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of intent to discontinue preparation of an Environmental 
Assessment for the conversion of a portion of Strawberry Valley Project 
(SVP) water from irrigation to other beneficial uses including 
municipal and industrial (M&I) use.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Recent discussions among the Department, Strawberry Water 
Users Association, and the South Utah Valley Municipal Water 
Association have resulted in a decision to terminate work on contracts 
to convert Strawberry Valley Project water from agricultural to 
municipal and industrial use. The Department has discontinued 
preparation of an Environmental Assessment intended to allow the 
conversion of SVP water from agricultural to municipal and industrial 
use. The Environmental Assessment was being prepared pursuant to the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and in accordance with a 
Federal Register notice published February 7, 2000, (Page 5880, Volume 
65, Number 25).
    The SUVMWA have determined to use alternate sources for municipal 
and industrial water instead of SVP water. The SWUA have determined to 
discontinue negotiations with the Department relative to the conversion 
of SVP water. As a result SVP water will continue to be used only for 
agricultural purposes and will only be available during the irrigation 
season.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additional information on matters 
related to this Federal Register notice can be obtained at the address 
and telephone number set forth below: Mr. Reed Murray, CUP Completion 
Act Office, Department of the Interior, 302 East 1860 South, Provo UT 
84606-6154, (801) 379-1237, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#56243b232424372f162335782325342478313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0b2adb5b2b2a1b980b5a3eeb5b3a2b2eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 1, 2000.
Ronald Johnston,
CUP Program Director, Department of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 00-31461 Filed 12-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ANTHONY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL

DISTRICT,

 Appellant,

v.

JACOB MORALES,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-08-00079-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. Five

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#2007-2861)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is the motion of Anthony Independent School District, Appellant,

to dismiss this appeal for the reason that the parties have settled all matters in controversy in the

underlying lawsuit. Appellee has not objected to the motion and there is no indication that dismissal

would prevent Appellee from seeking relief to which he would otherwise be entitled. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We therefore grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

KENNETH R. CARR, Justice

July 31, 2008

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.
The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District 1

Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

___________

No. 96-1196

___________

In re: Calvin Lee Sale, *

 *

Debtor, *

 *

----------------- *

 *

Calvin Lee Sale, * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Appellant, * Southern District of Iowa.

 *

v. * (UNPUBLISHED)

 *

U.S. Department of Education; *

Iowa Student Aid Commission, *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: October 7, 1996

 Filed: October 15, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Calvin Lee Sale appeals the district court's order dismissing his

1

bankruptcy appeal for failure to prosecute. We conclude the district

court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Sale's appeal.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 20360.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 19, 1939.

Milton H. Mulitz, of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s- Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for robbery, punishment assessed being twenty five years in the penitentiary.

, The record contains neither statement of facts nor hills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
NO. 07-05-0075-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

APRIL 29, 2005

______________________________

MARIANO VILLEGAS, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 87-405994; HONORABLE JIM BOB DARNELL, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to a plea bargain Mariano Villegas pleaded guilty to capital murder. The

trial court sentenced him to confinement for life in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice

Institutional Division. Appellant timely filed a pro se notice of appeal.

The record contains the trial court’s certification that this is a plea-bargained case,

and appellant has no right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2) and (d). The record shows
-2-

the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor

and agreed to by appellant. Following sentencing, appellant signed waivers of his right to

appeal pursuant to the plea bargain agreements. 

The clerk of this court notified appellant by letter on March 23, 2005, that the appeal

would be considered for dismissal on or after April 22, 2005, providing an opportunity to

respond. 

Appellant responded, but did not present grounds for continuing the appeal. As the

record shows that appellant has no right of appeal, the appeal is dismissed. Tex. R. App.

P. 25.2. 

James T. Campbell

 Justice

Do not publish.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           6,288                   6,288
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       47                      47
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,335                   6,335
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 210,332                 210,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                  18,600
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         9,225                   9,225
<OTHER-SE>                                    (60,134)                (60,134)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   210,332                 210,332
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    19                      99
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,679                  44,735
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,159                   5,546
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,159                   5,546
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (48,819)                (50,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (48,819)                (48,819)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)                   (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)                   (.01)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      10,678,170
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,194,010
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            15,550,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 11,975,485
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      11,733,635
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    116,929,457
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,145,823
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             172,393,148
<DEPOSITS>                                 157,179,601
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            719,829
<LONG-TERM>                                    439,617
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,785,170
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,268,931
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             172,393,148
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,542,138
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,316,592
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               285,126
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,143,856
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,105,640
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,133,966
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,009,890
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  225,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               3,828
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,937,975
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,417,559
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     850,589
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   850,589
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.54
<LOANS-NON>                                    195,507
<LOANS-PAST>                                   422,514
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               982,198
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   69,524
<RECOVERIES>                                     8,149
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,145,823
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,145,823
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trimol Group Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
covered in the Report.


                                                     /s/ Shmuel Gurfinkel
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Shmuel Gurfinkel
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     TRIMOL GROUP, INC.

August 14, 2002


                                       13
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00055

- CV

S ETH B OOKOUT , L ESLYE R OMERO , AND R YAN G ALLAGHER , Appellants

V

.

J ONATHAN S HELLEY AND S TEDFAST B APTIST C HURCH , Appell ees §

§
§
§ On Appeal from the 141st District Court

of Tarrant County ( 141

- 329494

- 21 )
November 23, 2022
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Bassel
JUDGMENT
This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and Appella nts ’

argument

— raised for the fi rst time on appeal

— that the trial court lacks subject matter
jurisdiction based on the ecclesia stical abste ntion doctrine.

For the re asons set forth in our memoran dum opi nion of even date herewith,
this court holds that Appellants ’ first issue pert aining to th e ecclesiastical abstention

doc t rin e shou ld be sustained in part and overruled in part. Accordingly, it is ord ered

that the trial court may properly exercise subject matter jurisdiction over this case;
provided, however
, that the ecclesiastica l abstention doctrine deprives the trial courtof subject matter jurisdiction to hear defamation claims predicated on the following : (1) any of Seth Bookout’s statements referring to Stedfast Baptist Church as a “cult”

or to Pa stor J onathan Shelley as a “cult leader ” and (2) any of Bookout’s statements
referring to Shelley as a “sodomite” or similar statements by Bookout that according
to Shelley “suggest that [Shelley] engage[s] in sexual activities that are condemned by
the doctrines of [his] [c]hurch.”

This court further holds that there was no error in the trial court’s order

den yi ng Appell ant s’ motion to dismiss

. Accor dingly, i t is ordered that the trial court ’ s

or der is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellan ts Bookout , L eslye Romero, and Ryan
Gallagher s hall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTR ICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel Justice Dabney Bassel
Exhibit 32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002In connection with the Quarterly Report of Packeteer, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe three months ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dave Côté, as President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.        Date: October 31, 2006 /s/  DAVE CÔTÉ   Dave Côté   President and Chief Executive Officer
#### RICH v. STATE.

No. 21242.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 23, 1940.

J. W. McCullough, of McKinney, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s A tty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Upon appellant’s plea of guilty of the •offense of theft, and the waiver of a trial by jury, the court assessed his penalty at a fine of $25 and confinement in the county jail for five days.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception, hence no matter of procedure is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ONLINE
SYSTEMS SERVICES, INC AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,847,476
<SECURITIES>                                 2,701,625
<RECEIVABLES>                                  478,744
<ALLOWANCES>                                    78,606
<INVENTORY>                                    181,415
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,567,415
<PP&E>                                         727,505
<DEPRECIATION>                                 222,763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,236,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          531,930
<BONDS>                                         24,717
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,965,140
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,284,942)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,236,845
<SALES>                                        113,582
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               516,472
<CGS>                                           96,293
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  335,038
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (648,464)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (648,464)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (648,464)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7662
TIAYON KARDELL EVANS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:04-cr-00099-RAJ; 2:06-cv-000162-RAJ) Submitted: March 21, 2007 Decided: April 10, 2007 Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tiayon Kardell Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Tiayon Kardell Evans seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Evans has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED