alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's unaudited consolidated financial statements as of September 30,
1996, and the nine months then ended, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,150
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,975
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,125
<PP&E>                                         730,420
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 719,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,447
<BONDS>                                         84,110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     611,108
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   719,665
<SALES>                                         28,806
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,435
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (451)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,626
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,327
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,327
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,327
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENTS 
OF OPERATIONS, BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
ITS ENTIRETY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       61,982
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     12,278
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          33,257
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   3,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,897
<COMMON>                                         1,187
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       36,428
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             29,675
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  67,290
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,446
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            23,778
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    1,063
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  17,320
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  110,897
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       38,678
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               923
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      33,327
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      34,250
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          5,351
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (4,479)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     872
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       (1,889)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,890)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         18
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  (9,890)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         2,151
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           8,672
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.33)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1467 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1467

      To extend certain provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act and the 
 Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 for 10 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2009

 Mr. Smith of Texas (for himself, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Boehner, Mr. 
 Coble, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of California, Mr. King of 
   Iowa, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Jordan of Ohio, Mr. Rooney, Mr. 
 Harper, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Pence, Mr. Cantor, Mr. Shadegg, Mr. Hunter, 
Mrs. Bachmann, and Ms. Fallin) introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the 
Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend certain provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act and the 
 Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 for 10 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe and Secure America Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. 10-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT 
              AND THE INTELLIGENCE REFORM AND TERRORISM PREVENTION ACT 
              OF 2004.

    (a) USA PATRIOT Act.--Section 102(b) of the USA PATRIOT Improvement 
and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-177; 120 Stat. 195) is 
amended by striking ``December 31, 2009'' and inserting ``December 31, 
2019''.
    (b) Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.--
Section 6001(b)(1) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention 
Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-458; 118 Stat. 3742; 50 U.S.C. 1801 note) 
is amended by striking ``December 31, 2009'' and inserting ``December 
31, 2019''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Medivation, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date: August 15, 2005



|       |  |                                                  
|------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|       | 
|       |  | /s/    C. PATRICK
MACHADO                        
|Name:  |  | C. Patrick Machado                               
|Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board ofDirectors and Shareholders 

RadiSys Corporation: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements Nos. 333-49092 and 333-146977 on Form S-3 and registration statements Nos. 333-80577, 333-00514, 333-46473, 333-137060,333-80087, 333-80089, 333-85093, 333-38966, 333-38988, 333-50582, 333-50584, 333-68362, 333-106670, 333-111520, 333-116570, 333-126189, 333-142968, 333-142969, 333-158959, 333-162230, and 333-162231 on Form S-8 of RadiSys Corporation of our reportsdated March 15, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of RadiSys Corporation as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and comprehensiveincome (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31,2009 annual report on Form 10-K of RadiSys Corporation. 

Our report dated March 15, 2010, on the consolidated financial statements,contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Company retrospectively changed its method of accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion in 2009. 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

Portland,Oregon 

March 15, 2010
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 15

- 00015

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.E.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 76th District Court Titus County, Texas Trial Court No. 37,180

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 

### ORDER Court reporter Cresta LeFevre recorded the trial court proceedings in cause number 06

- 15

- 00015

- CV, styled In the Inte rest of L.E.S., a Child , trial court cause number 37,180 in the 76th Judicial District Court of Titus County, Texas. The reporter’s record in this accelerated appeal of a parental rights termination order was due on March 2, 2015. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 35.1(b). LeFevre has not filed the record and has not filed a motion for extension of time in which to file the record. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure establish that “trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appe llate record is timely filed.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 35.3(c). The Rules further instruct that an “appellate court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely filing of the appellate record.” Id. In furtherance of our responsibilities established by th e Rules, we find we must take steps to ensure that the record in this case is filed i n a reasonable amount of time. Therefore, we hereby order LaFevre to file the reporter’s record in cause number 06

- 15

- 00015

- CV, styled In the Interest of L.E.S., a Child , trial court cause number 37,180 in the 76th Judicial District Court of Titus County, Texas The record is to be received by this Court no later than Monday, March 23, 2015. If the reporter’s record is not received by March 23, we warn LeFerve that we may begin contempt proceedings and order her to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of this Court for failing to obey its order.3 IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: March 12, 2015
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50484

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE ANGEL ORTIZ, a/k/a Chaeto,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-95-CR-83(2)

- - - - - - - - - -

April 15, 1997

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Angel Ortiz pleaded guilty to count 1 of an indictment

charging him with conspiracy to distribute cocaine and has

appealed his sentence. The Government contends that the appeal

should be dismissed because Ortiz waived his statutory appellate

rights in his plea agreement with the Government. Ortiz argues

that the waiver was not knowing and voluntary because his

sentence had not yet been determined at the time he entered his
No. 96-50484

- 2 -

guilty plea. The district court determined that Ortiz understood

that he had a right to appeal his sentence and that he was

waiving that right by entering a guilty plea under the terms of

the plea agreement with the Government. No objection was raised

and there is no reason to believe that Ortiz did not know what he

was doing. See United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir. 1994); United States

v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 568 (5th Cir. 1992). The appeal is frivolous and is

DISMISSED. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### MAYFIELD v. HUSTAD et al.

No. 8927.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Dec. 14, 1932.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 25, 1933.

R. T. Pritchett, of Corpus Christi, for plaintiff in error.

E. B. & Howell Ward, of Corpus Christi, for defendants in error.

FLY, C. J.

Plaintiff in error sued J. C. Hustad and the City National Bank & Trust Company of Corpus Christi, and Kosar & Kosar, a partnership for $1,060' held in escrow by said bank. It was alleged by plaintiff in error that he and Hustad entered into a contract for the sale by plaintiff in error to Hustad of a certain lot in the city of Corpus Christi, under the terms of which plaintiff in error was to furnish an abstract of title satisfactory to his attorney, and when such abstract was furnished, and deed given to the land, Hustad bound himself to pay plaintiff in error the sum of- $5,000 in cash,f and assume the payment of three promissory notes executed by plaintiff in error amounting in the aggregate to $5,000, and he was also to deposit with the City National Bank, afterwards succeeded by the City Bank & Trust Company, the *242sum of $1,000 as liquidated damages. Hustad made the deposit.

The first proposition is as follows: “The Trial Court should have rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff-in-error, because, if the X Company did dedicate the Street S in Y Subdivision to C City and the X Company conveyed by warranty deed all the Y Subdivision, without restriction or reservation of title whatsoever, before C City abandoned Street S, then afterwards C City abandoned Street S and M acquired the title to the abandoned Street S held by the holders of record fee simple title to the lots abutting both sides of the abandoned Street S at the time of abandonment, then M holds merchantable record title to the abandoned Street S.”

The proposition is not only unique but suggestive of an attempt to conceal from all but the initiated, the cryptic meanings of a secret society. It is about as plain and obvious as the newspaper names and designations of baseball and football teams are to an untutored layman, struggling to ascertain the result of a game. The abbreviations show such economy of time, and space as would arouse envy in the breast of the most thrifty, typical Scotchman. The court has no key to the mystical letters used, and has not the time to look through pleadings, voluminous and tedious, to arrive at the identity of the parties and places described by letters. The proposition is too obscure for consideration.

The second and only remaining proposition is not obscure, but is long and so involved as to be unintelligible. It may be said that it assumes the existence of facts not sustained by the statement, which clearly indicates that the abstract did not show a merchantable title, and that I-Iustad was justified in refusing to pay for the land.

The judgment is affirmed.
Assumption Letter



 EXHIBIT 4.11 
  
 [ASSUMPTION LETTER] 
  
 December 31, 2004 
  
 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, 
 as Property Trustee and Guarantee
Trustee 
 919 Market Street, Suite 700 
 Wilmington, DE 19801

  
 Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, 
 as Delaware Trustee 
 919 Market Street, Suite 700 
 Wilmington, DE 19801 
  
 Re: Guaranty Corporation  
  
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
  
 By virtue of the merger between Guaranty Corporation, a Colorado corporation (“Guaranty”) and Newco Front Range, Inc., a Colorado corporation
and wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial Bank Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Centennial”), and the subsequent merger of Guaranty into Centennial, Centennial, as the surviving corporation, does hereby agree, affirm and
acknowledge that it assumes all the duties, warranties, and obligations of Guaranty (i) in its role as Depositor and sole Holder of the Common Securities under the Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated June 30, 2003 (the “Trust
Agreement”), among Guaranty, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as property trustee, Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, as Delaware trustee and the Administrative Trustees named therein, and (ii) in its role as Guarantor
under the Guarantee Agreement, dated June 30, 2003 (the “Guarantee”), between Guaranty, as Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Guarantee Trustee. 
  
 As to all matters relating to the Guarantee, this letter shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of
the State of New York without regard to its conflict of laws principles. Except as set forth in the immediately preceding sentence, this letter shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware without regard
to its conflict of laws principles. The undersigned (i) irrevocably submits itself to the non-exclusive jurisdiction and venue of any Delaware State court or Federal court sitting in Wilmington, Delaware in any action arising out of this letter, and
(ii) consents to the service of process by mail. 
  
 Initially
capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined are used as defined in the Trust Agreement or the Guarantee. 







 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association 
 Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company 
 December 31, 2004 
  Page
 2
 
  
 [SIGNATURE PAGE
FOLLOWS] 







 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association 
 Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company 
 December 31, 2004 
  Page
 3
 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	CENTENNIAL BANK HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Paul W. Taylor


	Name:	 	Paul W. Taylor
	Title:	 	 Executive Vice President and
 Chief Financial
Officer
U.S. EPA, Region Ill (3RA00) DEC i 0 1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 191 03-2029 . ..

wteti I13 1)

Re: Section 1 10(a)(2) (A)-(M) Requirements Already Contained in District’s State

Implementation Plan

Dear Mr. Welsh:

This letter is being submitted to address the requirements of Section 1 10(a)(2)(A)-(M) oftheClean Air Act (CAA) relevant to the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard

(NAAQS). Many ofthe requirements ofthis section are already contained in the District of

Columbia’s current state implementation plans (SIP) or SIP revisions that have been submitted to

but not yet approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The enclosed chart identifies those “infratructure” requirements that we believe are already

contained in the SIP that are applicable to the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, as well as those

infrastructure requirements that we believe are contained in SIP revisions that have been

submitted to but not yet approved by EPA. The attainment plans and the regulations cited in the

enclosed chart have gone through public notice and hearing prior to submittal to EPA. The chartalso identifies those infrastructure requirements which are not applicable to District of Columbia.

This letter confirms that the District’s SIP already addresses the enclosed requirements of

Section 110(a)(2)(A)-(M). Should you have any questions or require additional information,

please contact Cecily Beall at (202) 535-2626.

Sincerely,

George S. Hawkins, Esq.

Director

Enclosure

DLSTRIcTDRpAR’rMENT 51 N Street, NE, 6th Fl., Washington, DC 20002 Phone: (202) 535-2600 Facsimile: (202) 535-2881

OF THE ENVIRONMENT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         802,957
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               903,453
<PP&E>                                       1,230,866
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,685)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,150,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          188,786
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,732
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,895,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,150,512
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               213,551
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,660
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (192,710)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (192,710)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (192,710)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>