alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1352

To amend the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy

Act of 1977 to extend eligibility to junior and community colleges for

grants and fellowships for food and agricultural sciences education.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 16, 1993

Mr. HUGHES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the National Agricultural Research, Extension,

and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 to extend eligibility

to junior and community colleges for grants and fellowships for food and agricultural sciences education.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR GRANTS AND FELLOWSHIPS

4 FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

5 EDUCATION.

6 Section 1417 of the National Agricultural Research,

7 Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C.
2

•HR 1352 IH

1 3152) is amended by adding at the end the following new

2 subsection:

3 ‘‘(j) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section:

4 ‘‘(1) The terms ‘college’ and ‘university’ include

5 a junior or community college.

6 ‘‘(2) The term ‘junior or community college’

7 means an educational institution that—

8 ‘‘(A) admits as regular students persons

9 who are beyond the age of compulsory school

10 attendance in the State in which the institution

11 is located and who have the ability to benefit

12 from the training offered by the institution;

13 ‘‘(B) does not provide an educational pro14 gram for which it awards a bachelor’s degree

15 (or an equivalent degree); and

16 ‘‘(C) provides an educational program of

17 not less than 2 years that is acceptable for full

18 credit toward such a degree.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1981 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 412
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1981

                          [Report No. 115-248]

 To amend the Natural Gas Act to expedite approval of exports of small 
            volumes of natural gas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 18, 2017

 Mr. Cassidy (for himself, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

                              May 10, 2018

              Reported by Ms. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Natural Gas Act to expedite approval of exports of small 
            volumes of natural gas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Scale LNG Access Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. EXPEDITED APPROVAL OF EXPORT OF CERTAIN VOLUMES OF NATURAL GAS.

    Section 3(c) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b(c)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(c) For purposes of'' and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(c) Expedited Application and Approval Process.--
            ``(1) Free trade agreements in effect.--For purposes of''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Small-scale natural gas exports.--For purposes of 
        subsection (a), any application for the exportation of natural 
        gas in a volume that is equal to or less than 51,100,000,000 
        cubic feet per year of natural gas shall be--
                    ``(A) deemed to be consistent with the public 
                interest; and
                    ``(B) granted without modification or delay.
            ``(3) Exclusions.--Paragraphs (1) and (2) shall not apply 
        to any nation subject to sanctions imposed by the United 
        States.''.
                                                       Calendar No. 412

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1981

                          [Report No. 115-248]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the Natural Gas Act to expedite approval of exports of small 
            volumes of natural gas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 10, 2018

                       Reported without amendment
```
steam_record - Re: ICR Extension Request 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

-----"Wearmouth, Ann" <ann.wearmouth@mirant.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Wearmouth, Ann" <ann.wearmouth@mirant.com> 

Date: 07/09/2010 10:08AM 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Wearmouth, Ann" <ann.wearmouth@mirant.com>

Date: 7/13/2010 6:07 AM

Subject: Re: ICR Extension Request

Attachments: ICR Extension Request.PDF

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C3C0293DO... 8/24/2011
Subject: ICR Extension Request 

I’ve attached a letter that was also mailed from our offices today requesting an extension to file the ICR for our Dickerson,

Morgantown and Chalk Point Generating Stations.  If you have any questions, don’t hesitate to e‐mail or phone me.    

Regards, Ann  

  

  

  

ann wearmouth

environmental engineer

mirant mid-atlantic, llc

(301) 955-9028

  

  

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C3C0293DO... 8/24/2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet of Adams Outdoor Advertising, Inc. as of March 31, 1999 and the related
Statements of Operations and Cash Flows and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001011976
<NAME> ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                        40
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      40
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                        (60)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        40
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 238 (Monday, December 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 77355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31418]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-118-000]


El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

December 5, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 28, 2000, El Paso Natural Gas Company 
(El Paso), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1-A, Eighth Revised Sheet No. 29, to become 
effective January 1, 2001.
    El Paso states that the tendered tariff sheet revises the fuel 
charges applicable to transportation service on El Paso's system.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commisssion in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-31418 Filed 12-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### The GILMORE & PITTSBURGH R. R. CO. et al., Appellants, v. STATE OF IDAHO, on Relation of J. W. TAYLOR, Attorney General, et al., Appellees.

No. 9275.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

July 1, 1940.

L. B. daPonte and M. L. Countryman, Jr., both of St. Paul, Minn., for appellants.

J. W. Taylor, Atty. Gen., and D. W. Thomas, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Idaho, and T. D. Jones, of Pocatello, Idaho, for appellees.

Before GARRECHT, DENMAN, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of motion of appellants, for reversal of the decree of the District Court herein, and remand of the cause to said District Court, and appellees not objecting thereto, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the decree of the District Court herein be reversed and that this cause be remanded to the said District Court for entry of a decree dismissing the bill of complaint, without prejudice, that a decree be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1732 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to promote testing of incentive 

payments for behavioral health providers for adoption and use of certified 

electronic health record technology. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2017 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself and Mr. PORTMAN) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to promote 

testing of incentive payments for behavioral health providers for adoption and use of certified electronic health 

record technology. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Access to 

5 Behavioral Health Information Technology Act’’. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1732 IS

1 SEC. 2. TESTING OF INCENTIVE PAYMENTS FOR BEHAV2 IORAL HEALTH PROVIDERS FOR ADOPTION 

3 AND USE OF CERTIFIED ELECTRONIC 

4 HEALTH RECORD TECHNOLOGY. 

5 Section 1115A(b)(2)(B) of the Social Security Act 

6 (42 U.S.C. 1315a(b)(2)(B)) is amended by adding at the 

7 end the following new clause: 

8 ‘‘(xxv) Providing incentive payments 

9 to behavioral health providers for the adop10 tion and use of certified electronic health 

11 record technology (as defined in section 

12 1848(o)(4)) to improve the quality and co13 ordination of care through the electronic 

14 documentation and exchange of health in15 formation. Behavioral health providers may 

16 include— 

17 ‘‘(I) public or private hospitals 

18 that are principally psychiatric hos19 pitals (as defined in section 1861(f)); 

20 ‘‘(II) community mental health 

21 centers (as described in section 

22 1913(b)(2) of the Public Health Serv23 ice Act (42 U.S.C. 300x–2(b)(2))); 

24 ‘‘(III) accredited residential or 

25 outpatient mental health treatment 

26 facilities; 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1732 IS

1 ‘‘(IV) accredited substance abuse 

2 treatment facilities; 

3 ‘‘(V) clinical psychologists (as de4 fined in section 1861(ii)); and 

5 ‘‘(VI) clinical social workers (as 

6 defined in section 1861(hh)(1)).’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
#### New York State Higher Education Services Corporation, Respondent, v Michael Handler, Appellant.

Mahoney, P. J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Prior, Jr., J.), entered June 1, 1989 in Albany County, which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

Defendant defaulted on student loans guaranteed by plaintiff, which paid the balance to the lending bank in 1974. Plaintiff commenced this action to recover the balance plus interest in 1985. Defendant’s answer included an affirmative defense of the Statute of Limitations. Plaintiff moved for summary judgment. Supreme Court granted summary judgment to plaintiff, concluding that the Statute of Limitations was tolled. Defendant appeals.

We reverse. There is no dispute that this action was commenced more than six years after plaintiffs cause of action

*753accrued *(see,*CPLR 213 [2]). We therefore must determine whether the limitations period was tolled, which occurs if a defendant is outside New York at the accrual of a cause of action *(see,*CPLR 207). Plaintiff points out that by virtue of a prior preclusion order, all issues concerning defendant’s address, domicile, dwelling place, residency and driving records have been resolved in favor of plaintiff. Thus, plaintiff contends that the limitations period was tolled and CPLR 207 (3), which prohibits tolling if personal jurisdiction can be obtained while the defendant is outside New York, is not applicable. It is up to a plaintiff, however, to prove that the Statute of Limitations was tolled by a defendant’s absence from the State *(see,*McLaughlin, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C207:l, at 367). This requires a showing that there was no statutory authority for obtaining jurisdiction over the defendant and not merely that the defendant could not be located *(see, Yarusso v Arbotowicz,*41 NY2d 516).

In this case there does not seem to be any serious dispute that defendant was outside New York during the relevant time period, otherwise the applicability of tolling under CPLR 207 would not even be at issue. Since defendant was subject to jurisdiction under CPLR 302 (a) (1) and could have been served under CPLR 308 (5) or CPLR 313 *(see, State of N. Y. Higher Educ. Servs. Corp. v McGarry,*151 AD2d 819, 820; *State of N. Y. Higher Educ. Servs. Corp. v Langus,*140 AD2d 792, 793), we conclude that plaintiff has not satisfied its burden of establishing that the limitations period was tolled. Accordingly, the action is time barred, summary judgment to plaintiff should have been denied and, upon searching the record *(see,*CPLR 3212 [b]), summary judgment dismissing the complaint is awarded to defendant.

Order reversed, on the law, with costs, motion denied, summary judgment awarded to defendant and complaint dismissed. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,558
<SECURITIES>                                     3,091
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,487
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,408
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,131
<PP&E>                                          10,002
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,868)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,826
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        55,255
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,270)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,238
<SALES>                                         24,903
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,093
<CGS>                                              356
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,420
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,956
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,781
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,829)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       470
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,299)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,299)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.12)
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

C.S., the Mother,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, 

and GUARDIAN AD LITEM,

Appellees.

No. 4D2023-1258

[March 5, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Hope Bristol, Judge; L.T. Case No. 16-004524 DP.

Roger Ally of Law Offices of Roger Ally, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Carolyn Schwarz, Children’s Legal Services, Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellee Department of Children and Families. 

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sarah Todd 

Weitz, Senior Attorney, Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, 

for appellee Guardian Ad Litem.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32-1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund V, L.P., Series 3 (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2012
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief
Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Partnership.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.                                      | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.                                          | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
|                                                               
|November 9, 2012
**Exhibit 32****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION***     In connection with the Quarterly Report of AirNet Systems, Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Joel E. Biggerstaff, Chairman of theBoard, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Gary W. Qualmann, Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer and Secretary, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of their knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCorporation and its subsidiaries.         /s/ Joel E. Biggerstaff Joel E. Biggerstaff     /s/ Gary W. Qualmann Gary W. Qualmann  Chairman of the Board, ChiefExecutive Officer and President   Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer andSecretary         Dated: May 15, 2006   Dated: May 15, 2006   * This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certificationshall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actof 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Corporation specificallyincorporates it by reference into any such filing.
28
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard A. Paulo, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.), rendered February 5, 1990, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.

Upon pleading guilty to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, defendant was sentenced to nine months in the County Jail and fined $500. Defendant now contends that since he was experiencing extreme depression and stress at the time he committed this felony, extraordinary circumstances exist warranting a reduction in his sentence. However, defendant has a lengthy criminal record which spans over 40 years and includes at least three other arrests for driving while intoxicated. Under these circumstances and the fact that County Court adhered to its agreement at the time of the plea not to give defendant any time in State prison, the sentence was a proper exercise of the court’s *757discretion *(see, People v Jennette,*128 AD2d 955, 956, *lv denied*69 NY2d 951).

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Mercure, JJ., concur.