### 1036 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 5 / Friday, January 8, 2010 / Notices

appropriate entries. The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the publication of the final results

of this review. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this

review. The final results of this review

shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of these reviews and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.

The Department clarified its

‘‘ automatic assessment’’ regulation on May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties , 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) ( ‘‘Assessment Policy Notice’’ ). This clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by companies

included in these final results of review for which the reviewed companies did not know that the merchandise they sold to the intermediary ( e.g. , a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was

destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all–

others rate if there is no rate for the intermediary involved in the

transaction. See Assessment Policy

Notice for a full discussion of this

clarification.

Cash Deposit Requirements

The following deposit rates will be effective upon publication of the final

results of this administrative review for all shipments of hot–rolled carbon steel flat products from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for the company listed above will be the

rate established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is less than 0.5 percent and, therefore, de

minimis , the cash deposit will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company–specific rate published for

the most recent final results in which that manufacturer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in these reviews, a prior review, or the original less–than-fair– value ( ‘‘ LTFV’’ ) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate

will be the rate established for the most

recent final results for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any previous review or the LTFV conducted by the Department, the cash deposit rate will be 23.87 percent, the all–others rate

established in the LTFV. See Amended

Final Determination . These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall

remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping and countervailing duties.

These preliminary results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).

Dated: December 30, 2009.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010–128 Filed 01–07–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S**

**DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION**

**Notice of Proposed Information Collection Requests** 

**AGENCY :**  Department of Education.

**SUMMARY :**  The Acting Director,

Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, invites comments on the proposed information collection requests as required by the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995.

**DATES :**  Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before March 9,

2010.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) provide interested Federal agencies and the public an early opportunity to comment on information collection requests. OMB may amend or waive the requirement for public consultation to the extent that public participation in the approval process would defeat the purpose of the information collection, violate State or Federal law, or substantially interfere with any agency’s ability to perform its statutory obligations. The Acting Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, publishes that notice containing proposed information collection requests prior to submission of these requests to OMB. Each proposed information collection, grouped by office, contains the following: (1) Type of review requested,

e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4) Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the information; (5) Respondents and frequency of collection; and (6) Reporting and/or Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites public comment.

The Department of Education is especially interested in public comment addressing the following issues: (1) Is this collection necessary to the proper functions of the Department; (2) will this information be processed and used in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate of burden accurate; (4) how might the Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (5) how might the Department minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology.

Dated: January 5, 2010.
James Hyler,
Acting Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management.

Institute of Education Sciences

Type of Review: New. Title: National Title I Study of Implementation and Outcomes: Early Childhood Language Development (ECLD).

Frequency: One time. Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal
Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs.

Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour

Burden:
Responses: 16. Burden Hours: 36.

Abstract: The study is being conducted as part of the National Assessment of Title I, mandated by Title I, Part E, Section 1501 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The data obtained by this information collection will provide a sampling frame of eligible schools for the National Title I Study of Implementation and Outcomes: Early Childhood Language Development (ECLD). Once school districts have been indentified to participate in the study, they will be asked to complete a short form providing information about Title

I schools in their district. This information includes the percent of

student in a selected school that are


### 1037 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 5 / Friday, January 8, 2010 / Notices

eligible for free-or-reduced-price lunch, percent of third graders who are classified as reading proficient on State assessments in 2009–10, grade levels in selected schools, and number of students in each grade. Based on the information provided, up to ten schools per district will be randomly selected to participate in the full-scale study. The U.S. Department of Education has Mathematica Policy Research to conduct this study.

Requests for copies of the proposed information collection request may be

accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the ‘‘ Browse Pending

Collections ’’ link and by clicking on link number 4195. When you access the information collection, click on

‘‘ Download Attachments ’’ to view. Written requests for information should be addressed to U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537. Requests may also be electronically

mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202–401–0920. Please specify the complete title of the information collection when making your request.

Comments regarding burden and/or the collection activity requirements should be electronically mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who

use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at

1–800–877–8339.

[FR Doc. 2010–136 Filed 1–7–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4000–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION**

**Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools; Overview Information; Readiness and**  **Emergency Management for Schools; Notice Inviting Applications for New**  **Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2010**

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

(CFDA) Number: 84.184E.

Dates: Applications Available: January 8,

2010.

Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: February 26, 2010.

Deadline for Intergovernmental

Review: April 27, 2010.

Full Text of Announcement

I. Funding Opportunity Description

Purpose of Program: Past emergencies, such as the events of September 11, 2001, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, and emergencies related to other natural and man-made hazards,

reinforce the need for schools and communities to plan for traditional crises and emergencies, as well as other catastrophic events. The Readiness and Emergency Management for Schools (REMS) grant program provides funds to local educational agencies (LEAs) to establish an emergency management process that focuses on reviewing and strengthening emergency management plans, within the framework of the four phases of emergency management (Prevention-Mitigation, Preparedness, Response, and Recovery). The program also provides resources to LEAs to provide training for staff on emergency management procedures and requiresthat LEAs develop comprehensive allhazards emergency management plans in collaboration with community partners including local law enforcement; public safety, public health, and mental health agencies; and local government.

Priorities: These priorities are from the notice of final priorities and requirements for this program, published in the Federal Register on March 11, 2009 (74 CFR 10656).

Absolute Priority: For FY 2010 and any subsequent year in which we make

awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this competition, this priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) we consider only applications that meet this priority.

This priority is: LEA Projects Designed To Develop and Enhance Local Emergency Management Capacity.

Under this priority, we support LEA projects designed to create, strengthen, or improve emergency management plans at the LEA and school-building levels and build the capacity of LEA

staff so that the LEA can continue the implementation of key emergency management functions after the period of Federal funding. Projects must include a plan to create, strengthen, or improve emergency management plans, at the LEA and school-building levels,

and within the framework of the four phases of emergency management: Prevention-Mitigation, Preparedness, Response, and Recovery. Projects must also include: (1) Training for school personnel in emergency management procedures; (2) coordination, and the use of partnerships, with local law enforcement, public safety or emergency management, public health, and mental health agencies, and local government to assist in the development of emergency management plans at the LEA and school-building levels; (3) a plan to sustain the local partnerships after the period of Federal assistance; (4) a plan for communicating school emergency management policies and reunification procedures for parents and guardians and their children following an emergency; and (5) a written plan for improving LEA capacity to sustain the emergency management process through ongoing training and the continual review of policies and procedures.

Competitive Preference Priority: For FY 2010 and any subsequent year in

which we make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this competition, this priority is a competitive preference priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i) we award an additional five points to an application that meets the competitive preference priority.

This priority is: Priority for Applicants That Have Not Previously Received a Grant Under The REMS Program (CFDA 84.184E).

Under this priority, we give competitive preference to applications from LEAs that have not previously received a grant under this program (CFDA 84.184E). Applicants, including educational service agencies (ESAs), that have received funding under this program directly, or as the lead agency or as a partner in a consortium application under this program, will not meet this priority. Under a consortium application, all members of the LEA

consortium must meet this criterion to meet this priority.

Final Requirements: These requirements are from the notice of final priorities and requirements for this program, published in the Federal Register on March 11, 2009 (74 FR 10656). The following requirements apply to all applications submitted under this competition:

1. Partner Agreements. To be considered for a grant award, an applicant must include in its application an agreement that details the participation of each of the following five community-based partners: The law enforcement agency, the public safety or emergency management agency, the public health agency, the mental health agency, and the head of the applicant’s local government (for example the mayor, city manager, or county executive). The agreement must include a description of each partner’s roles and responsibilities in improving and strengthening emergency management plans at the LEA and school-building levels, a description of each partner’s

commitment to the continuation and continuous improvement of emergency management plans at the LEA and school-building levels, and the signature of an authorized representative of the LEA and each partner acknowledging the agreement. For consortium applications, each LEA to be served by