alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77959-77960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31472]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 33945]


Boot Hill & Western Railway Co., L.C.--Acquisition Exemption--
Dodge City Ford & Bucklin Railroad Co.

    Boot Hill & Western Railway Co., L.C. (BHWR), a noncarrier, has 
filed a notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire and operate 
approximately 25.73 miles of rail line from the Dodge City Ford & 
Bucklin Railroad Company. The line is located between milepost 347.9, 
at Bucklin, KS, and milepost 373.63, at Dodge City, KS. In conjunction 
with the acquisition of the rail line, BHWR will also acquire 
approximately 1.5 miles of incidental overhead trackage rights over a 
rail line owned by Union Pacific Railroad Company between Engineer 
Station 11+88 and Engineer Station 52+84.9, at Dodge City. The purpose 
of the trackage rights is to enable BHWR to interchange traffic with 
The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company at Dodge City. 
BHWR certifies that its projected revenues as a result of this 
transaction will not result in its becoming a Class II or Class I rail 
carrier, and further certifies that its annual revenues will not exceed 
$5 million.
    The transaction is expected to be consummated on or shortly after 
December 6, 2000.
    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance

[[Page 77960]]

Docket No. 33945, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 
Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Karl Morell, BALL, JANIK LLP, Suite 225, 1455 F Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20005.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``www.stb.dot.gov.''

    Decided: December 5, 2000.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.


Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-31472 Filed 12-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 62 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Appointing the day for the convening of the second session 

of the One Hundred Eleventh Congress. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the second regular session of the One Hundred 
2 

•HJ 62 EH 

1 Eleventh Congress shall begin at noon on Tuesday, Janu2 ary 5, 2010. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 62 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Appointing the day for the convening of the second 

session of the One Hundred Eleventh Congress.
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: hswriter@frontiernet.net

Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 9:31 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Cc: Jordan, Deborah

December 20, 2013

Dear Shaheerah, 

To better understand the permit I am commenting on (SAC 12-01) I need to 

make sure I have the law straight. 

It is my understanding that under the Clean Air Act, A PSD permit is 

required if a stationary source of pollution will emit "10 tons per year 

or more of any hazardous air pollutant or 25 tons per year or more of any 

combination of hazardous air pollutants." 

Because of the ruling in favor of The Center for Biological Diversity, Co2 

emissions must be included in that 10/25 ton calculation. 

Thank you for your ongoing help. 

Sincerely, 

Heidi Strand
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AS AMENDED  In connection with the Annual Report of Guardian Technologies International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory E. Hare, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the reporting requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: April 9, 2010 Signed: /s/ Gregory E. Hare Name: Gregory E. Hare Title: Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

**EDWARD J. SMITH, Appellant** 

**v.**

**DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.,**  **Appellees :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 9 MAP 2016**  **Appeal from the Order of the**  **Commonwealth Court dated 1/12/16 and exited on 1/13/16 at No. 68 MD 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: October 18, 2016

AND NOW **, this 18th day of October, 2016, the Order of the Co mmonwealth** 

**Court is AFFIRMED.**
Exhibit 10.4


               Summary Sheet of Non-Employee Director Compensation
                               (effective 5/6/05)


a.       Annual cash retainer -- $25,000

b.       Annual deferred stock unit award -- $40,000 value

c.       Board meeting attendance -- $2,500 per meeting ($750 if attendance by
         telephone)

d.       Committee meeting attendance -- $2,500 per meeting ($750 if attendance
         by telephone)

e.       Committee chairperson annual retainer -- $5,000 ($15,000 for
         chairperson of Audit Committee)

f.       Lead Director annual retainer -- $15,000
p080512.en3 INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 08-0512 Post-Focus Draft Revision 3 1/17/2012

ENGINEER: Macek/Austin \ PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

Page 1p080512.en3

SAT (concerns) (07/25/2008): Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P1B1T1 Health: 1 XB Testing (No Testing desired) Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1ppb), XB Testing (Testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: NR

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: None.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: Yes (0 criteria met)

1) # of workers exposed: 0 >1000? No 2) >100 workers with >10 mg/day inhalation exposure: No 3) (a) >100 workers w/1-10 mg/day inh. exp. & >100 days/yr: No (b) Routine Dermal Cont: >250 workers & >100 days/yr: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 08-0512

Page 2p080512.en3

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 08-0512

Page 3p080512.en3

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.

Page 4p080512.en3

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 08-0512

Page 5p080512.en3

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.

Page 6p080512.en3

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Page 7p080512.en3

-

Page 8
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 76226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30986]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-112-000]


Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

November 28, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 22, 2000, Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Eastern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1 and Sixth 
Revised Sheet No. 647 to be effective on January 1, 2001.
    Texas Eastern states that the purpose of this filing is to remove 
from Section 16 of the General Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas 
Tariff certain provisions that are no longer applicable, to revise the 
phone number of the person to whom complaints should be directed 
regarding Texas Eastern's compliance with the Commission's gas 
marketing affiliate rules and to provide for the posting on Texas 
Eastern's Internet Web site of information regarding shared operating 
employees and shared facilities, as well as any physical office space 
barriers and card key protections that may be necessitated by virtue of 
shared office space, consistent with Commission precedent.
    Texas Eastern states that copies of its filing have been mailed to 
all affected customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm. (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-30986 Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with this  Quarterly  Report  of  UnionBanCal  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
I.  Matson,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated:  August 6, 2004





                                    By:      /S/ DAVID I. MATSON
                                       --------------------------------------
                                                 David I. Matson
                                             Chief Financial Officer
*OPINION ISSUED AUGUST 16, 2007*

#### CAROL A. PASCUCCI VS. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

(CC-07-103)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Jason C. Workman, Attorney at Law, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted to the Court for decision upon a Stipulation entered into by claimant and respondent wherein certain facts and circumstances of the claim were agreed to as follows:

1. On March 20, 2007, claimant was traveling on Dunbar Avenue in Dunbar, Kanawha County when her vehicle struck a hole in the road, damaging a rim.

2. Respondent was responsible for the maintenance of Dunbar Avenue which it failed to maintain properly on the date of this incident.

3. As a result of this incident, claimant’s vehicle sustained damage in the amount of $357.15.

4. Respondent agrees thatthe amount of $357.15 for the damages put forth by the claimant is fair and reasonable.

The Court has reviewed the facts of the claim and finds that respondent was negligent in its maintenance of Dunbar Avenue on the date of this incident; that the negligence of respondent was the proximate cause of the damages sustained to claimant’s vehicle; and that the amount of the damages agreed to by the parties is fair and reasonable. Thus, claimant may make a recovery for her loss.

Accordingly, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award in the amount of $357.15.

Award of $357.15.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2010

y0621 

# Order

June 28, 2010

140764

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140764 COA: 295684 Otsego CC: 08-003961-FH SHELLY JEAN PATTERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 28, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,510
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,216
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     46,792
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          10,055
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         77,634
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,175
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 149,317
<DEPOSITS>                                     129,118
<SHORT-TERM>                                       206
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,096
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,829
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,068
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 149,317
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,742
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  801
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    71
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,614
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,157
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,161
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,453
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       25
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (6)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    936
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    674
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         503
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       503
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        182
<LOANS-PAST>                                       483
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,209
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       77
<RECOVERIES>                                        18
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,175
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,175
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 188 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 37
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 188

                          [Report No. 115-28]

    To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the costs of painting 
     portraits of officers and employees of the Federal Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 23, 2017

 Mr. Cassidy (for himself, Mr. Johnson, Mrs. McCaskill, Mrs. Fischer, 
 Mrs. Ernst, and Mr. Tester) introduced the following bill; which was 
   read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
                          Governmental Affairs

                             April 24, 2017

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the costs of painting 
     portraits of officers and employees of the Federal Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eliminating Government-funded Oil-
painting Act'' or the ``EGO Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR PORTRAITS.

    (a) Prohibition.--No funds appropriated or otherwise made available 
to the Federal Government may be used to pay for the painting of a 
portrait of an officer or employee of the Federal Government, including 
the President, the Vice President, a Member of Congress, the head of an 
executive agency, or the head of an office of the legislative branch.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``executive agency'' has the meaning given the 
        term in section 133 of title 41, United States Code; and
            (2) the term ``Member of Congress'' includes a Delegate or 
        Resident Commissioner to Congress.
                                                        Calendar No. 37

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 188

                          [Report No. 115-28]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

    To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the costs of painting 
     portraits of officers and employees of the Federal Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 24, 2017

                       Reported without amendment
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99
ClinTrials Research Inc.
Schedule VIII - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
FYE 12/31/96


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Col A.                                   Col. B                   Col C.                          Col. D.            Col. E
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Additions
                                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Balance at                           Charged to
                                       Beginning         Charged to       Other Accounts -      Deductions -       Balance at
           Description                  Balance        Cost & Expense        Describe             Describe        End of Period
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                     <C>               <C>                        <C>          <C>              <C>
Year Ended December 31, 1996:
 Deducted from asset accounts
  Allowance for Doubtful Accounts       315,445           458,994                     0           105,222          (1  669,217

                                        ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Total                                 315,445           458,994                     0           105,222              669,217
                                        ========================================================================================


Year Ended December 31, 1995:
 Deducted from asset accounts
  Allowance for Doubtful Accounts       312,623            65,110                     0            62,288          (1  315,445

                                        ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Total                                 312,623            65,110                     0            62,288              315,445
                                        ========================================================================================


Year Ended December 31, 1994:
 Deducted from asset accounts
  Allowance for Doubtful Accounts       311,788           222,028                     0           221,193          (1   312,623

                                        ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Total                                 311,788           222,028                     0           221,193               312,623
                                        ========================================================================================
</TABLE>


1) - Uncollectible accounts written off
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00209-CR Don Veloz, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 9034221, HONORABLE MICHAEL LYNCH, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted. S ee Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________ David Puryear, Justice Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: September 30, 2004 Do Not Publish
/*!
 * jQuery UI Labels 1.13.2
 * http://jqueryui.com
 *
 * Copyright jQuery Foundation and other contributors
 * Released under the MIT license.
 * http://jquery.org/license
 */
!function(t){"use strict";"function"==typeof define&&define.amd?define(["jquery","./version"],t):t(jQuery)}((function(t){"use strict";return t.fn.labels=function(){var e,s,i,n,a;return this.length?this[0].labels&&this[0].labels.length?this.pushStack(this[0].labels):(n=this.eq(0).parents("label"),(i=this.attr("id"))&&(a=(e=this.eq(0).parents().last()).add(e.length?e.siblings():this.siblings()),s="label[for='"+t.escapeSelector(i)+"']",n=n.add(a.find(s).addBack(s))),this.pushStack(n)):this.pushStack([])}}));
//# sourceMappingURL=labels-min.js.map