alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1939 

To repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 5, 2017 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. MENENDEZ, 

Mr. SANDERS, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. REED, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. VAN

HOLLEN, Mr. CARPER, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. WYDEN, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Ms. 

WARREN, Mr. KAINE, Ms. HARRIS, Mr. CARDIN, and Mr. BOOKER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Access to Jus5 tice for Victims of Gun Violence Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1939 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE PROTECTION OF LAWFUL COM2 MERCE IN ARMS ACT. 

3 Sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Protection of Lawful Com4 merce in Arms Act (15 U.S.C. 7901, 7902, and 7903) 

5 are repealed. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION ***

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of AirNet Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joel E. Biggerstaff,Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                     | /s/ Joel E. Biggerstaff                                                                                   |   |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     | Joel E. Biggerstaff                                                                                       |
|                     |                                                                                                      |
|                     | Title:  Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive  Officer and President  (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                     |                                                                                                      |
| Date:  May 14, 2004 |                                                                                                      |

 

 

----

*This certification is being furnished asrequired by Rule 13a -14(b) under Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the“Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Thiscertification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except asotherwise stated in such filing.

 

1

----
<PAGE>


                    D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G.
William Ruhl, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. [ss] 1350, as adopted pursuant to [ss] 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that based on my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. [ss] 78m(a) or [ss]
78o(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



   /s/ G. William Ruhl
-----------------------------
Name:  G. William Ruhl
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  November 14, 2002
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk February 6, 2013

s0130 

# Order

February 6, 2013

145433

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145433

COA: 307480

Wayne CC: 01

- 003031

- 01

JUAN WALKER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Wayne County Prosecuting

Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this

or der. The prosecutor shall pay particular attention to the defendant’s contention that his

trial counsel was ineffective for failing to inform him of the prosecutor’s September 26,

2001 offer of a plea bargain to second

- degree murder and a sentence agreeme nt of 25 to

50 years. The prosecutor is to address whether the defendant is entitled to relief under

Missouri v Frye, 566 US ___; 132 S Ct 1399; 182 L Ed 2d 379 (2012).

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
Notice is hereby given that, on April 5, 1999, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Southwest Research Institute (“SwRI”)—Durability and Life Assessment of GTD-111 Buckets has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Aramco Services Company, Houston, TX has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Southwest Research Institute (“SwRI”)—Durability and Life Assessment of GTD-111 Buckets intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On October 31, 1995, Southwest Research Institute (“SwRI”)—Durability and Life Assessment of GTD-111 Buckets filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 17, 1996 (61 FR 54222).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 21, 1998. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on March 19, 1999 (64 FR 13606).                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-3124  Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Joey FERRERA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 4636.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

April 10, 1940.

Henry Bane, of Durham, N. C., for appellant.

Carlisle W. Higgins, U. S. Atty., of Greensboro, N. C., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Case docketed and dismissed on motion of appellee. Order filed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-3146]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated October 8, 1999, and published in the Federal 
Register on October 18, 1999, (64 FR 56227), LifePoint, Inc., 10410 
Trademark Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, which has been 
changed to 10400 Trademark Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, 
made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration 
(DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of 
controlled substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............  I
Amphetamine (1100).........................  II
Methamphetamine (1105).....................  II
Phencyclidine (7471).......................  II
Benzoylecgonine (9180).....................  II
Morphine (9300)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firms plans to use gram quantities of the listed controlled 
substances to manufacture drug abuse test kits.
    DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, 
Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of LifePoint, Inc. 
to manufacture the listed controlled substances is consistent with the 
public interest at this time. DEA has investigated the firm on a 
regular basis to ensure that the company's continued registration is 
consistent with the public interest. These investigations have included 
inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, 
audits of the company's records, verification of the company's 
compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's 
background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 
0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 
Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the 
above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes 
of controlled substances listed above is granted.

    Dated: January 27, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-3146 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATIONS





I, Brian Bronson, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Radisys Corporation for the fiscal year ended


December 31, 2011; and





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact


necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: April 27, 2012





/s/ Brian Bronson


Brian Bronson


President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF KAYENTA KREATIONS, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,090
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,205
<PP&E>                                           9,311
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              352
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,019
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,669
<SALES>                                             70
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    70
<CGS>                                               23
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,075
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,910)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,910)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,910)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
exv10w1







Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE MGM MIRAGE

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN II




     WHEREAS, Section 11.2 of the MGM MIRAGE Deferred Compensation Plan II (the “Plan”) provides
that the Plan may be amended in whole or in part by the Board of Directors of MGM MIRAGE (the
“Board”), provided that no amendment or modification shall decrease or restrict the value of a
Participant’s vested account balance in existence at the time of such amendment or modification;
and



     WHEREAS, the Board has approved and authorized this Amendment No. 1 to the Plan (this
“Amendment”).



     NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of November 4, 2008, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:



     1. Section 3.6 of the Plan shall be amended to add the following sentence at the end thereof:



     Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no Annual Company Matching Amounts shall be
credited to the account of any Participant with respect to any Plan Year commencing on or after
January 1, 2009; provided, however, that a Participant shall continue to vest in Annual Company
Matching Amounts credited prior to such date in accordance with Section 3.7 of the Plan.



     2. Article 11 of the Plan shall be amended to add the following new Section 11.5:



     Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Committee, in its sole discretion and to
the extent it deems appropriate, may permit Participants to make changes to existing payment
elections prior to December 31, 2008 or such earlier date as the Committee may specify. Any
election changes made pursuant to this Section 11.5 may not defer into later years amounts that
would have been payable in 2008 or cause payment of amounts payable in later years to be
accelerated into 2008. Elections under this section 11.5 shall comply in all respects with the
provisions of Internal Revenue Service Notice 2007-86 and other applicable Internal Revenue Service
and Treasury guidance.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed by a duly authorized officer as of the date set
forth below.



MGM MIRAGE




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ John M. McManus
	 	 	 	Date:
	 	November 4, 2008
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	John M. McManus,	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Senior Vice President,	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Assistant General Counsel & Assistant Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITS FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,608
<SECURITIES>                                     1,608
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,132
<PP&E>                                          20,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,045
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,242
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           211
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,876
<SALES>                                             51
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   661
<CGS>                                                1
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        1
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  24
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,913)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,913)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.61)
        

</TABLE>
Docket No. FAA-2011-1060

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 1/25/11

Regional Airline Association Dave Lotterer

Connie

Arnold

1/25/11

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 1/25/11

ATA Joe White 1/25/11
#### Chas. FARRIS v. STATE.

No. 15927.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 12, 1933.

Wright Stubbs, of Austin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for forgery; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The record is here without statement of facts or bills of exception.

The judgment will be affirmed.
#### PITMAN v. STATE.

No 20950.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 27, 1940.

Jewel N. Bauldwin, of Cleburne, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Atty., of Austin-, for the State.

■ BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The conviction is for perjury; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before this' court without statement of facts or hills of exception. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense charged and waived a jury upon the trial. No error having been presented, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF GEOLOGICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC





CONSENT
OF GEOLOGICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of any reports concerning reserves and
other analyses performed by us in our capacity as an independent consultant to
USCorp (the “Company”), which are set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K and for the year ended September 30, 2009 and any registration
statements or prospectuses to be filed in connection with the sale or resale
from time to time of securities of the Company, or amendments or supplements
thereto; and in any amendment to any registration statements or
prospectuses.





We also
consent to the reference to us under the headings “Consultants” and “Experts” in
any of the aforementioned documents.




GEOLOGICAL
      SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC/S/ Robert CameronName:
      Robert CameronTitle:
      President
#### SMITH v. HORN et al.

No. 3572.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Jan. 25, 1940.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 7, 1940.

E. E. Davis, of Newton, for appellant.

Minton & Minton, of Hemphill, for appel-lees.

COMBS, Justice. '

This suit was for recovery of possession of a refrigerator placed in the home of ap-pellee T. J. Horn for demonstration purposes by an agent of appellant. It was alleged that appellee Horn and A. A. Wilson refused to allow removal of the refrigerator. Wilson was also made a party defendant. Both defendants answered by general demurrer and general denial. But upon the trial, the defendant Wilson offered proof to the effect that plaintiff’s agent had, by fraudulent representation, sold a refrigerator to Mrs. Wilson, wife of defendant, and collected therefor $264.50; that when he demanded return of his money the agent promised to leave the refrigerator in the Horn home as additional security for return of the money. The trial court rendered judgment for plaintiff for possession of the refrigerator but conditioned the possession with a requirement that plaintiff first refund to Wilson the $264.50 paid by Mrs. Wilson to appellant’s agent for the refrigerator which she bought.

Opinion.

The judgment is clearly erroneous. Under the pleadings and the evidence appellant is entitled to possession of the refrigerator sued for. Whatever action appellee Wilson has against appellant for fraud must be asserted in a separate suit upon proper aver-ments, either for damages or for rescission and an offer to return the refrigerator purchased by the wife. That cause of action could not properly have been asserted in this suit for repossession of the refrigerator placed by appellant’s agent with appel-lee Horn, even if it had been pleaded.

The judgment of the trial court will be reformed so as to award to appellant possession of the refrigerator sued for, unconditionally. As so reformed, the judgment is affirmed,

Reformed and affirmed. ..
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                       IMAGYN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                        DIRECT AND INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES


A.  Imagyn Medical Technologies California, Inc., a California corporation

    1.  Cybro Medical, Ltd., an Israeli corporation

    2.  Richard-Allan Medical Industries (U.K) Limited, a United Kingdom
        corporation

B.  DACOMED CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation ("Dacomed")

C.  ALLSTATE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. a Minnesota corporation

D.  OSBON MEDICAL SYSTEMS, LTD., a Georgia corporation

E.  MICROSURGE,  INC., a Delaware corporation

F.  IMAGYN MEDICAL, INC., a Delaware corporation