alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-
K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                          <C>          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS      <F1>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                              1,305
<SECURITIES>                        2,808
<RECEIVABLES>                       4,402
<ALLOWANCES>                          277
<INVENTORY>                         4,519
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   13,281
<PP&E>                              1,339
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     16,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               2,353
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                              119
<OTHER-SE>                         13,718
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       16,215
<SALES>                            23,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   30,233
<CGS>                              16,005
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      16,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    5,445 <F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (1,421)
<INCOME-TAX>                           80
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (1,501)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (1,501)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.13) <F3>


        
<FN> 
<F1>  The Company changed its fiscal year end. The reporting year ended 
      January 2, 1999 is referred to herein as ending on December 31, 1998.
<F2>  Item consists of research and development.
<F3>  Item consists of basic earnings per share.
</FN>
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1180 

To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 to prohibit 

the Secretary of the Treasury from receiving common stock or certain 

other voting stock under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2009 

Mr. NEUGEBAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 

2008 to prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from 

receiving common stock or certain other voting stock 

under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1180 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON THE RECEIPT OF COMMON 

2 STOCK AND THE EXERCISE OF STOCK VOT3 ING POWER. 

4 Title I of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act 

5 of 2008 is amended by adding at the end the following 

6 new section: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 137. PROHIBITION ON THE RECEIPT OF COMMON 

8 STOCK AND THE EXERCISE OF STOCK VOT9 ING POWER. 

10 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other pro11 vision of this title, in carrying out this title the Secretary 

12 shall not make any purchase for which the Secretary re13 ceives control-diluting stock. 

14 ‘‘(b) APPLICATION.—Subsection (a) shall apply to 

15 purchases made by the Secretary under this title on or 

16 after the date of the enactment of this section. 

17 ‘‘(c) CONVERSION OF CERTAIN SECURITIES RE18 CEIVED BY THE SECRETARY.—Notwithstanding any other 

19 provision of this title, the Secretary shall not convert any 

20 security received by the Secretary under this title, other 

21 than a warrant, into control-diluting stock. 

22 ‘‘(d) CONTROL-DILUTING STOCK DEFINED.—For 

23 purposes of this section, the term ‘control-diluting stock’ 

24 means— 

25 ‘‘(1) common stock of a financial institution; 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1180 IH

1 ‘‘(2) any other voting stock of a financial insti2 tution, other than voting stock that the Secretary 

3 agrees not to exercise the voting power of such 

4 stock; or 

5 ‘‘(3) a warrant giving the right to the Secretary 

6 to receive stock described in paragraph (1) or (2).’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

WORLD AWARD FOUNDATION INC., AMER GROUP LLC, AN BANG GROUP LLC, and AB STABLE GROUP LLC,

Plaintiffs Below, Appellants,

v.

ANBANG INSURANCE GROUP CO. LTD., CBIRC, and BEIJING GREAT HUA BANG INVESTMENT GROUP CO. LTD.,

Defendants Below, Appellees. §

§ § No. 265, 2020 § § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. 2019-0605 § § § § § § § § §

Submitted: September 8, 2020 Decided: September 21, 2020

ORDER

On August 11, 2020, this Court received from Tian Ge Zhou a notice of appeal

from a Court of Chancery order and judgment entered on July 2, 2020. Under

Supreme Court Rule 6, a timely notice of appeal should have been filed on or before

August 3, 2020. A notice of appeal must be timely filed to invoke the Court’s

appellate jurisdiction. 1 A notice of appeal must be received by the Court within the

1 Carr v. State , 554 A.2d 778, 779 (Del. 1989).2 applicable time period to be effective. 2 On August 24, 2020, the Senior Court Clerk

issued a notice directing the appellants to show cause why this appeal should not be

dismissed as untimely filed. On September 3, 2020, the Court received the certified

mail receipt indicating that the notice to show cause had been delivered on August

28, 2020. The appellants have not filed a response to the notice to show cause within

the required ten-day period. Dismissal of this appeal is therefore deemed to be

unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice

2 D EL

. S UPR

. C T

. R. 10(a).
|                                 |
|---------------------------------|
|                                 |  |  |
| ACI WORLDWIDE                   | DOT HILL SYSTEMS | NOVATEL WIRELESS |
| ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES      | ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES | OCLARO |
| ADVENT SOFTWARE                 | EMULEX | OPNEXT |
| ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS   | ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS | PEGASYSTEMS |
| ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR | EPICOR SOFTWARE | POWER INTEGRATIONS |
| ANADIGICS                       | EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA - SJ | POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES |
| APPLIED MICRO CIRCUITS          | EXFO | QAD |
| ARIBA                           | EXTREME NETWORKS | QLIK TECH |
| ARUBA NETWORKS                  | FORTINET | REALNETWORKS |
| ATHENAHEALTH                    | HARMONIC | SEMTECH |
| AVIAT NETWORKS                  | INFINERA | SHORETEL |
| AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES            | INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE | SILICON LABORATORIES |
| BLACKBAUD                       | INTERNAP NETWORK SERVICES | SMSC |
| BLACKBOARD                      | IXIA | SPIRENT COMMUNICATIONS |
| BLUE COAT SYSTEMS               | KOFAX | SUCCESSFACTORS |
| CABOT MICROELECTRONICS          | LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR | SYMMETRICOM |
| CALIX                           | MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES | TEKELEC |
| CAVIUM                          | MELEXIS | THE ACTIVE NETWORK |
| CIRRUS LOGIC                    | MERCURY COMPUTER SYSTEMS | TOKYO ELECTRON US HOLDINGS |
| COGNEX                          | MERGE HEALTHCARE | TOPPAN PHOTOMASKS |
| COMMVAULT SYSTEMS               | MICREL SEMICONDUCTOR | ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY |
| COMSCORE                        | MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL | VICOR |
| DATALINK                        | MSC.SOFTWARE | WEBSENSE |
| DEALERTRACK                     | MULTITEST |   |
| DIALOGIC                        | NETSCOUT SYSTEMS |   |
| DIGI INTERNATIONAL              | NEUSTAR |   |
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of J.N.R., a Child

No. 06-15-00084-CV

Appeal from the 146th District Court of 

Bell County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 264,127-

B). Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, 

Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED MAY 13, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
2005 INCENTIVE BONUS PLAN



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
  
 CSI Incentive Bonus Plan (IBP) 
 05/06/2005 
  
 The following plan has been
developed to increase CSI profits by setting profit goals and rewarding employees for achieving those goals. By using profit rather than revenue as the basis for the bonuses, employees will be encouraged to not only increase revenue but also
decrease expenses. 
  
 The Incentive Bonus Plan (IBP) will group employees into
levels based on job responsibilities. Employees will also be designated as Network Integration, Software, General, Sales and Named Executives (former shareholders of CSI-South Carolina). Sales and Named Executives will not participate in the IBP.
The General staff (admin, director of sales, CFO) will participate 50/50 between Network Integration and Software. 
  
 The Level 3 group will include managers (CTO, CFO, Sales Manager, Engineering Manager, Operations Manager, Software Support Manager, Technical Support Manager and
Software Technical Support Manager). Level 2 group will include network integration client engagement managers, network integration system architects, software project leaders and the purchasing manager. Level 1 group will include all other staff.

  
 A range of profit goals will be identified for the MIN/MID/MAX bonus levels
and bonuses will be determined based on achievement of these goals. The separate profit goals will be set for the Network Integration division and the Software division. 
  

										
	 	  	MINIMUM

	 	 	MIDPOINT

	 	 	MAXIMUM

	 
	 Level 1
	  	3.00	%	 	4.50	%	 	6.00	%
	 Level 2
	  	5.00	%	 	7.50	%	 	10.00	%
	 Level 3
	  	10.00	%	 	15.00	%	 	20.00	%

  
 If the maximum goals are achieved, the
bonuses for 2005 (based on 2005 budgeted salaries) would be $325,000. 
  
 Each
employee will receive one half of the identified percentage bonus for meeting the divisional profit goal and the other half will be set aside to be distributed to staff within the division based on personal performance goals (e.g. 5% bonus = 2.5%
for meeting division goal, 2.5% adds to the pool for personal performance goals and could be distributed to other employees within the division. An individual employee could receive more than 5% but not less than the 2.5%). 
  
 Management will make recommendations to the Board of Directors for the profit goals and will
define the personal performance goals.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 237 (Friday, December 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 77063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31304]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2000-69]


Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received; 
Dispositions of Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petitions for exemption received and of dispositions 
of prior petitions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the 
application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption 
Part 11 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this notice 
contains a summary of certain petitions seeking relief from specified 
requirements of 14 CFR, dispositions of certain petitions previously 
received, and corrections. The purpose of this notice is to improve the 
public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of FAA's 
regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the 
inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to 
affect the legal status of any petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket 
number involved and must be received on or before December 31, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on any petition in triplicate to: Federal 
Aviation Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel, Attn: Rule Docket 
(AGC-200), Petition Docket No. ______, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, D.C. 20591.
    The petition, any comments received, and a copy of any final 
disposition are filed in the assigned regulatory docket and are 
available for examination in the Rules Docket (AGC-200), Room 915G, FAA 
Headquarters Building (FOB 10A), 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, D.C. 20591; telephone (202) 267-3132.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Forest Rawls (202) 267-8033, or 
Vanessa Wilkins (202) 267-8029 Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal 
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, D.C. 
20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to sections 11.85 and 11.91 of 
part 11 of 14 CFR.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., on December 5, 2000.
Donald P. Byrne,
Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.

Petitions for Exemption

    Docket No.: 30128.
    Petitioner: EAA Warbirds of America Squadron 14, Inc.
    Section of the 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR Sec. 61.63(d)(5) and part 
125.
    Description of Relief Sought: To permit Squadron 14 pilots to 
conduct nonstop sightseeing or demonstration flights for compensation 
or hire within 25 miles of the departure airport in Squadron 14's 
Douglas DC-3 airplane (Registration No. N2805J, Serial No. 20835) 
without those pilots having completed the practical test for a DC-3 
type rating in actual or simulated instrument conditions.
[FR Doc. 00-31304 Filed 12-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Numerex Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Stratton J. Nicolaides, as Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or
used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by
law.


March 30, 2004                                  /s/ Stratton J. Nicolaides
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Stratton J. Nicolaides
                                                Chief Executive Officer


                                      -5-
Testimony for EPA CarbonHearing. March 24,2012. Chicago,IL.

Name: Sandy Carter Organization: Chicago Youth Climate Coalition Contact: carters989@gmail.com

I am a third year undergraduate at the University ofChicago and an environmental activist. I have spent the past two years fighting to change the way society treats the environment in an attemptto mitigate the negative impacts ofclimate change the world is beginningto face. While I want my government to do more, I am excitedthat the EPA is looking towards issues of carbon, and I support this proposed rule to limit carbon emissions.

As an individual, a student, and as a member ofthe next generation, I am especially concerned about the future ofhumanity on this planet. Carbon dioxide emissions have been shownto be linked to climate change, and as many ofyouknow, the potential impacts ofglobal warming are truly frightening.

I grewup onthe shores ofthe Chesapeake Bay in Maryland and have seen first handthe effects offossil fuels and carbonemissions. In 2003, a tropical storm struck my community andflooded my neighborhood. I realize that the connection between carbon emissions, climate change, and weatherpatterns is often doubted and remains under debate, but watching the flood waters rise
was very real. And it was real when my neighbors, many ofwhom had lived in this region for decades and whose families' had called the Chesapeake home for generations, explainedthat no storm in the past fifty years had caused this amount ofdamage. While my neighborhood recovered, this event and muchlarger disasters, such as Hurricane Katrina in 2005, throw into focus the direction our world is headed ifwe don't act.

More carbon in our atmosphere means more intense storms. Itmeans anincrease in coastal flooding. Itmeans the oceans will take back the land. Itmeans my mother's home will be under water in fifty years. Itmeans our snowwill melt and our rivers will run dry. Itmeans waterand food shortages. Itmeans no future for the beautiful planet I call home and it means no future for my generation.

There are many days when I have my doubts about changing this future. I doubt that we cando anything about climate change, and that the social, economic, and political atmosphere will ever allowfor the development ofa more sustainable society. But the coming closure ofthe two coal plants in this city which 1now call home gives me some reasonto hope. And this rule gives me more hope.

The newrule will limit the amount ofcarbonthat new power plants can emitto I000 pounds per megawatt hour. This is a start to moving our society offoffossil fuels. Yet, I still have feelings ofdoubt. We need to do more. We need to stop building coal plants. Period. We need to stop building natural gas plants. We need real climate rules. We need leaders, both nationally and internationally, willing to fight for this planet. We need to hold ourcorporations accountable. We needto realize that we cannot as a country and a world keep waiting. And we need the EPAto institute this proposed rule and then fight for an even stronger rule.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER OF A BATEMENT

Appellate case name: In the Interest of R. J., A Child

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 00 729

- CV

Trial court case number: CV29910

Trial court: 3 44 th District Court of Chambe rs County

Although appellant R. J., Sr.’s counsel filed an amended brief on October 9, 2018,

t he Clerk of this Court’s October 22 , 201 8 notice warned appellant E.M. ’s counsel that the time to file her brief had expired and that appellant’s brief w as due within 10 days of the date of that notice. N o brief or extension has been timely filed by appellant E.M.’s counsel

. B ecause this is a termination appeal , this Court is required to dispose of this appeal within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed, so far as reasonably possible. See
T EX

. S T

. J UD

. A DMIN

. R. 6.2(a) (West 201 7 ). Here, t he 180

- day compliance deadline is set for February 6 , 201 9

. Accordingly, the Court sua sponte abate s this appeal for the trial court to hold a hearing and a ppellant E.M. ’s counsel, R. A. Reba Eichelberger

, is required to show cause why s he should not be relieved of h er duties after a finding of good cause is rendered by the court on the record and, if so , to enter orders withdrawing counsel and appoint ing new counsel. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 107.016(2) (West 201 4 ); In re M.V.G. , 285 S.W.3d 573, 575

– 76 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2009, order). Any hearing shall be conducted within 10 days of the date of this Order . The trial court clerk shall file a supplemental clerk’s record contain ing the trial court’s orders within 1 5 days of the date of this Order. If a hearing is held, the court reporter shall file a supplemental reporter’s record within 15 days of the date of this Order

. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s record s , if any, that comply with this Order are filed with th is Court. It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature:

__

/s/ Laura C. Higley

____ x Acting individually Acting for the Court Date: ___ November 9, 2018

___
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         54,703
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  117,966
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               172,669
<PP&E>                                         587,728
<DEPRECIATION>                                 241,171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 756,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          342,209
<BONDS>                                        10,448
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10,890
<OTHER-SE>                                     260,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   756,397
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               64,028
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (64,938)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (64,938)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (64,938)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)



</TABLE>