alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FW: Clarification of PSD Permit Application for PPEC 

Steve Hill 

to: 

Roger Kohn 

09/30/2011 11:17 AM 

Cc: 

Gary Rubenstein, djenkins, Maggie_Fitzgerald, "McKinsey, John A." 

Show Details 

History: This message has been forwarded. 

Roger: 

 

During our telephone conversation on Tuesday, you requested clarification of certain aspects of the project and 

the PSD application. 

 

PM

All of the project’s particulate emissions are assumed to be PM2.5. As a result, the PTE for PM equals the PTE for 

PM2.5, and also equals the PTE for PM10. 

 

The project’s PTE for PM is 37.2 TPY (see Table 4-19), which exceeds the PSD threshold for PSD applicability, 

which is 25 TPY (40 CFR (b)(23)(i)). The project is therefore subject to PSD for PM. 

 

The BACT analysis contained in the repackaged PSD application includes a top-down analysis for PM/ PM10/ 

PM2.5 from turbines and from the cooling tower. Because all of the PM emissions are PM2.5, the same analysis 

is applicable to all three pollutants. 

 

H2

S and fluorides

The PSD thresholds for H2S/reduced sulfur compounds and fluorides are 10 TPY and 3 TPY respectively. 

 

The Project’s annual emissions of each of these pollutants will be below the applicable PSD thresholds. 

--Steve Hill

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\rkohn\Local Settings\Temp\notesBAAA25\~web0379.htm 10/6/2011
EXHIBIT 99.2





Certification of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I, Michael A. Ernst, Chief Financial Officer, of Prentiss Properties Trust (the Registrant), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report):





(1)  The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section78o(d)); and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.








/s/  Michael A. Ernst


Michael A. Ernst


Chief Financial Officer


November 14, 2002





STATE OF TEXAS§


COUNTY OF DALLAS§





Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14 th day of November, 2002.





/s/  Lana
Mann


Lana Mann


November 14,
2002





Notary Public


My Commission Expires: 5/26/2005


Official Seal
IA 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 63 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit 

the number of years Representatives and Senators may serve. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2009 

Mr. PRICE of Georgia introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to limit the number of years Representatives and 

Senators may serve. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 63 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person shall be a Representative for 

3 more than eighteen years, except that service to fill a va4 cancy shall not be included in determining eligibility. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person shall be a Senator for more 

6 than eighteen years, except that service to fill a vacancy 

7 shall not be included in determining eligibility. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 3. Only service that begins after the date 

9 of ratification of this article shall count in determining the 

10 number of years a Representative or Senator serves.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Horton, Also Known as Ozzie, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (King, J.), rendered March 8, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

It is well settled that the decision as to whether to permit a defendant to withdraw a previously entered plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the court *(see, People v Hagzan,*155 AD2d 616, 617; *People v Camacho,*154 AD2d 611). In the instant case, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily made a complete plea allocution in the presence of competent counsel, after the court had fully apprised him of the consequences of his plea *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9). The basis asserted by the defendant for his application to withdraw his plea was the agency defense. However, his claim was factually insufficient to support the defense *(see, People v Roche,*45 NY2d 78, 83, *cert denied*439 US 958). Moreover, it appeared that the real reason for the application was that he was unhappy that he had not been released from jail prior to sentencing. Under these circumstances, it was not an improvident exercise of discretion to deny the motion. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
*OPINION ISSUED OCTOBER 10, 2007*

#### STEPHEN M. GOULD and JERI A. GOULD VS. *47DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

(CC-06-303)

Claimants appeared *pro se.*

Andrew F. Tarr, Attorney at Law, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Claimants brought this action for vehicle damage which occurred when a tree limb fell onto their 1985 Dodge D100 while it was parked adjacent to Sand Hill Road near St. Albans, Kanawha County. Sand Hill Road is a road maintained by respondent. The Court is of the opinion to deny the claim for the reasons more fully stated below.

The incident giving rise to this claim occurred at approximately 11:00 p.m. on October 5,2006, a stormy evening. Sand Hill Road is a one-lane highway at the area of the incident involved in this claim. Stephen Gould testified that a limb from a tree that was on respondent’s right of way fell and damaged their vehicle. He stated that the tree appeared to be a live tree prior to falling. Claimants’ vehicle sustained damages totaling $2,231.09.

The position of the respondent is that it did not have actual or constructive notice of the condition on Sand Hill Road at the site of the claimant’s accident for the date in question. Chet Burgess, an employee for respondent in Kanawha County, testified that he had no information about the tree that fell onto claimants’ vehicle prior to the incident

The well-established principle of law in West Virginia is that the State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of travelers upon its roads. *Adkins vs. Sims,*130 W.Va. 645; 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). The general rule of this Court with regard to tree fall claims is that if a tree is dead and poses an apparent risk, then the respondent may be held liable. However, when an apparently healthy tree falls and causes property damage as a result of a storm, the Court has held that there is insufficient evidence of negligence upon which to justify an award. *Wiles v. Division of Highways,*22 Ct. Cl. 170 (1998); *Gerritsen v. Dept. of Highways,*16 Ct. Cl. 85 (1986).

In the instant case, the Court is of the opinion that respondent had no notice that the tree at issue posed an apparent risk to the public. The evidence adduced at the hearing established that the tree appeared to be a healthy tree. Neither claimants nor respondent had reason to believe that the tree was in danger of falling. Thus, the claimants may not make a recovery for their loss in this claim.

In view of the foregoing, the Court is of the opinion to and does deny this claim.

Claim disallowed.
**Exhibit 32****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION***     In connection with the Quarterly Report of AirNet Systems, Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Joel E. Biggerstaff, Chairman of theBoard, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Gary W. Qualmann, Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer and Secretary, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of their knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the consolidated financial condition and results ofoperations of the Corporation and its subsidiaries.   /s/ Joel E. Biggerstaff /s/ Gary W. Qualmann   Joel E. BiggerstaffChairman of the Board, ChiefExecutive Officer and President Gary W. QualmannChief Financial Officer, Treasurer andSecretary   Dated:November 14, 2006 Dated: November 14, 2006* This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certificationshall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actof 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Corporation specificallyincorporates this certification by reference into any such filing.
32
D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries



EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 of
D&E Communications, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James W. Morozzi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                    
|/s/ James W. Morozzi
|Name:                |  | James W. Morozzi       
|Title:               |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                |  | May 9, 2008            



1



---

D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Thomas E. Morell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                    
|/s/ Thomas E. Morell
|Name:                |  | Thomas E. Morell       
|Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                |  | May 9, 2008            



2
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | True      Product ID, Inc                           |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                                                |   |
|   |   | By:   /s/ Michael J.      Antonoplos |   |
|   |   | Michael      J. Antonoplos                          |   |
|   |   | President                                           |   |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Amendment to Approved Tribal-State Compact.

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish, in the                         **Federal Register**                        , notice of approved Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has approved the Amendment to the Tribal-State Compact for Regulation of Class III Gaming Between the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon and the State of Oregon, which was executed on November 17, 2000.                    

# DATES:

This action is effective December 6, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director, Office of Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

Dated: November 27, 2000.

Kevin Gover,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 00-31025 Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2040 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 621 Kansas Avenue in Atchison, Kansas, as 

the ‘‘Amelia Earhart Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2040 ES

1 SECTION 1. AMELIA EARHART POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 621 Kansas Avenue in Atchison, 

4 Kansas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Amelia 

5 Earhart Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Amelia Earhart Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the Senate March 7, 2018. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2040 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostBuilding’’. ison, Kansas, as the ‘‘Amelia Earhart Post Office al Service located at 621 Kansas Avenue in Atch-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL DATA  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S  UNAUDITED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED IN ITS REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL  YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,  2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000873571
<NAME> VSI Liquidation Corp.

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                376,752
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         123,268
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    1,904,795
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      4,131,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 215,677
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                               79,066
<OTHER-SE>                                          3,002,643
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        4,131,907
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (198,754)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (25,954)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           (9,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        (16,954)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (16,954)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.00



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION I, Jack
 Braverman, certify that:1.
I have
 reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Trimol Group, Inc.2.
Based on my
 knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
 material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
 statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
 were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
 quarterly report;3.
Based on my
 knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
 in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
 financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
 as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
The
 registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
 and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
 Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant, and we have:a)
designed
 such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
 relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
 known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
 in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b)
evaluated
 the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as
 of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report
 (the Evaluation Date); andc)
presented in
 this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
 disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
 Evaluation Date;5.
The
 registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
 most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee
 of registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
 function):a)
all
 significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
 which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
 summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
 auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
any fraud,
 whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
 a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and6.
The
 registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
 report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or
 in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
 to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
 with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  November 14,
 2007
By /s/ Jack
 BravermanChief
 Financial Officer 22
*Exhibit 32.1*
*906 Certification*
This certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely inconnection with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code, “Failure of corporateofficers to certify financial reports”, and is not being filed as part of MBNA Corporation’s Form10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 accompanying this certification.
I, Bruce L. Hammonds, Chief Executive Officer of MBNA Corporation, certify that MBNA Corporation’sForm 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in thisreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof MBNA Corporation.     Date:   March 15, 2005   /s/ Bruce L. Hammonds   Bruce L. Hammonds   Chief Executive Officer
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 36

 37

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/09

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL