alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Austin, TX Site

Information Provided by Nick Scappini, HaloSource

08/24/2010 02:57 PM

Jesse

- attached is the case study along with the simple treatment BMP

- we call this semi passive

treatment and this is the model that we are using all over the country

- many more to come.

DBP2100 field trial TX 002

DBP2100 field trial TX 003 DBP2100 field trial TX 004DBP2100 field trial TX 005 DBP2100 field trial TX 006

DBP2100 field trial TX 007 DBP2100 field trial TX 008

DBP2100 field trial TX 009 DBP2100 field trial TX 010DBP2100 field trial TX 011 DBP2100 field trial TX 012

DBP2100 field trial TX 013 DBP2100 field trial TX 014

DBP2100 field trial TX 015Austin, TX pond dewateringSeveralstormwaterdetention pondsOne was usedto test a newBMP usingnaturalbiopolymerswith a geotextilefilter bagTurbid waterStormKlearGelFloc and DBP2100 w/ HanesTerraTex filterbag& 3” pumpResults: Clean WaterInlet water – 598 NTUStormKlear polymertreatment only – 117 NTUPolymer & Hanes filterbag(initial sample) – 58.8 NTUPolymer & filterbag (~15min sample) – 23.7 NTUPolymer & filterbag (~30min sample) – 10.5 NTU
Exhibit 10.1


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO


SJW CORP.


EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN


(Amended and Restated effective January 1,
2008)


 


Section 1(i) of SJW Corp.’s Executive Severance Plan is
amended effective July 23, 2008 to read in full as follows:


 


(i)          “Officer” shall mean (i) any
individual who has been elected as an officer of SJW Corp. or San Jose Water
Company by the Board of Directors and is serving in such capacity at any time
during the applicable time period set forth in Section 2(a) of the
Plan, unless expressly excluded from coverage under the Plan by the Board of
Directors at the time of such election, and (ii) any individual who has
been elected as an officer of any other member of the Employer Group and has been
expressly designated by the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors as a participant in the Plan and is serving in such capacity at any
time during the applicable time period set forth in Section 2(a) of
the Plan.  The persons who are Officers
as of January 1, 2008 are set forth on Exhibit A.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SJW Corp. has caused this instrument to be executed in its name by its duly authorized officer, all as of the day and year first above written.
 
 


	 
	SJW CORP.

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ W. Richard Roth

	 
	 
	 

	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
  President and Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Dated: July 23, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-30785

Summary Calendar

PAUL PIRO,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INCORPORATED;

GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,

Defendants-Appellees

No. 13-30832

Summary Calendar

PAUL PIRO,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA;

NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INCORPORATED,

Defendants-Appellants

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:11-CV-2049

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 22, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 13-30785 Document: 00512707638 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/22/2014
No. 13-30785 c/w 13-30832

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See Rule 47.6.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

2

 

 Case: 13-30785 Document: 00512707638 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/22/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      46,759,000
<SECURITIES>                                34,404,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,045,000
<PP&E>                                          69,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                (50,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             146,307,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,816,000
<BONDS>                                    172,052,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       107,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,668,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               146,307,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,850,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,397,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          23,330,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (52,168,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,200,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (50,968,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (50,968,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darnell Murray, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), both rendered April 1, 1985, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts) under indictment No. 2753/84, upon his plea of guilty, and robbery in the first degree (two counts) under indictment No. 3179/84, upon a jury verdict, respectively, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at the trial upon indictment No. 3179/84 in a light most favorable to the prosecution, we find that it was legally sufficient to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620; *People v Talley,*111 AD2d 885; *see also, People v Glover,*134 AD2d 448). Although the prosecution witness’s testimony contained minor inconsistencies, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be given to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded *573great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

With respect to the defendant’s claim that his plea under indictment No. 2753/84 was involuntarily made, he failed to move to withdraw his plea, so that his claim is unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636). In any event, we find that the defendant’s plea was knowing and voluntary *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9).

Further, the imposition by the Supreme Court of consecutive sentences under indictment No. 3179/84 was proper, since the acts of robbing two victims were separate and distinct, although they occurred within a single extended transaction *(see, People v Braithwaite,*63 NY2d 839; *People v Taylor,*155 AD2d 630).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Miller, JJ., concur.
exv10w2









EXHIBIT 10.2




AMENDMENT TO THE BLUE NILE, INC. EXECUTIVE OFFICER CASH INCENTIVE PLAN



Blue Nile, Inc.’s 2008 Executive Officer Cash Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) is hereby
amended to specifically state that any payments made pursuant to the Incentive Plan shall be paid
prior to March 15, 2009.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>      This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted
              from the Consolidated Balance  Sheet and  Consolidated  Statement
              of Operations of the Company as of and for the three months ended
              April 1, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
              such statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                        0001011584
<NAME>                                       FINE HOST CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000
<CURRENCY>                                   US DOLLARS
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 APR-01-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                              1.00
<CASH>                                      103,335
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                34,746
<ALLOWANCES>                                  1,230
<INVENTORY>                                   6,234
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            145,157
<PP&E>                                       37,702
<DEPRECIATION>                               13,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              286,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        49,015
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                         91
<OTHER-SE>                                   57,643
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                286,884
<SALES>                                      84,996
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             84,996
<CGS>                                        77,979
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                86,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              4,932
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                174
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,041
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (7,690)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     40
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (7,730)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (7,730)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (0.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.85)
        


</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1183 

To suspend temporarily the duty on glyoxylic acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2009 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on glyoxylic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GLYOXYLIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.04.91 Glyoxylic acid (CAS No. 

298–12–4) (provided for in 

subheading 2918.30.90) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2012 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1183 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals Eleventh Circuit. No. 95-6243. Cassandra JENKINS, a minor, By her mother and next friend, Sandra HALL; Onieka McKenzie, a minor, by her mother and next friend, Elizabeth McKenzie, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. TALLADEGA CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION; Susannah Herring, individually and in her capacity as a teacher of Graham Elementary School; Melba Sirmon, individually and in her capacity as counselor at Graham Elementary School, Defendants-Appellees, Charles Kurley, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Talladega City School District, et al., Defendants. Oct. 16, 1996. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (No. 94-PT-739-E); Robert B. Propst, Judge. (Panel Opinion September 23, 1996, 11th Cir., 1996, 95 F.3d 1036) Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, KRAVITCH, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Acting Chief Financial Officer of Novoste Corporation (the Company), each
hereby certify that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|1. |  | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: August 8, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/    ALFRED J. NOVAK
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------
|                     |  |  |  |                       
|                     |  |  |  |                       





|Date: August 8, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/    SUBHASH C. SARDA
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  |  |                        
|                     |  |  |  |                        



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Novoste Corporation and will be retained by Novoste Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as
part of the Form 10-Q.
Page 1 of 1

TIGTA 3.1 Table

$000,000s

Agency External Agency External Total Agency External Agency External Total Agency External Agency External Total Percent

Capital Investments Total 2.966 - 8.923 - 11.889 2.989 - 9.041 - 12.030 3.018 - 9.132 - 12.150 1%

Major IT sub-total

non-Major IT sub-total 0.866 - 2.599 - 3.465 0.819 - 2.458 - 3.277 0.825 - 2.477 - 3.302 1%

Standard/Non-Standard IT sub-total 2.100 - 6.303 - 8.403 2.170 - 6.512 - 8.682 2.193 - 6.583 - 8.776 1%

IT Total 2.966 - 8.902 - 11.868 2.989 - 8.970 - 11.959 3.018 - 9.060 - 12.078 1%

non-IT Total - - 0.020 - 0.020 - - 0.071 - 0.071 - - 0.072 - 0.072 1%

TIGTA non-Major IT Investments

TIGTA IT Applications and Collaboration (IT A&C) 0.866 - 2.599 - 3.465 0.819 - 2.458 - 3.277 0.825 - 2.477 - 3.302 1%

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0.866 - 2.599 - 3.465 0.819 - 2.458 - 3.277 0.825 - 2.477 - 3.302 1%

TIGTA Standard/Non-Standard IT Investments

TIGTA IT Enterprise Architecture & Management (IT 

EA&M)

0.288 - 0.864 - 1.152 0.220 - 0.661 - 0.881 0.222 - 0.668 - 0.890 1%

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0.288 - 0.864 - 1.152 0.220 - 0.661 - 0.881 0.222 - 0.668 - 0.890 1%

TIGTA IT Infrastructure End User Systems and 

Support (ITI EUSS)

0.735 - 2.204 - 2.939 0.777 - 2.332 - 3.109 0.788 - 2.364 - 3.152 1%

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0.735 - 2.204 - 2.939 0.777 - 2.332 - 3.109 0.788 - 2.364 - 3.152 1%

TIGTA IT Infrastructure Mainframe and Servers 

Services and Support (ITI MSSS)

0.765 - 2.297 - 3.062 0.824 - 2.472 - 3.296 0.830 - 2.492 - 3.322 1%

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0.765 - 2.297 - 3.062 0.824 - 2.472 - 3.296 0.830 - 2.492 - 3.322 1%

TIGTA IT Infrastructure Telecommunications (ITT TSS) 0.312 - 0.938 - 1.250 0.349 - 1.047 - 1.396 0.353 - 1.059 - 1.412 1%

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses 0.312 - 0.938 - 1.250 0.349 - 1.047 - 1.396 0.353 - 1.059 - 1.412 1%

TIGTA non-IT Investments

TIGTA Vehicle Fleet - - 0.020 - 0.020 - - 0.071 - 0.071 - - 0.072 - 0.072 1%

015-05-0119-0 TIGTA Salaries and Expenses - - 0.020 - 0.020 - - 0.071 - 0.071 - - 0.072 - 0.072 1%

FY 2017 Actuals FY 2018 President's Budget FY 2019 President's Budget

DME O&M Total DME O&M Total DME O&M Total

Change 

from CY 

to BY
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBITS NO. 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Advanced Photonix, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
D. Kurtz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  June 29, 2006

                                            /s/ Richard Kurtz
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Richard Kurtz
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

                                       64
Description of Verbal Arrangements with Members of the Company's Board



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 The following is a summary description of the verbal arrangements with the Company’s non-employee members of the Board of Directors
regarding their compensation: 
  
 Each non-employee director is paid an annual fee
of $20,000 for his or her services as a director, and $1,000 for each Board of Directors meeting attended. Each regular member of the Compensation Committee receives $1,000 for each Compensation Committee meeting attended; the Chairperson of the
Compensation Committee receives $2,000 for each Compensation Committee meeting attended. Each regular member of the Audit Committee receives $2,000 for each Audit Committee meeting attended; the Chairperson of the Audit Committee receives $3,000 for
each Audit Committee meeting attended. Each regular member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives $1,000 for each Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meeting attended; the Chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee receives $2,000 for each Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meeting attended. All non-employee directors are reimbursed for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending Board of Directors meetings and
committee meetings. New non-employee directors elected or appointed at any time other than at the August Board meeting will receive an initial pro-rated stock option grant in an amount equal to the product of (i) the percentage of the year remaining
until the next regularly scheduled August Board meeting, and (ii) 12,000. Each non-employee director of the company automatically receives an annual grant of 12,000 options at the August meeting of the Board. These stock options are granted at the
then-current market price, and vest immediately but will not be exercisable until the one-year anniversary of the grant date.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

# Additional Information:

By a vote of 5-0 on November 27, the Commission determined pursuant to U.S.C. 552b(e) and § 9.107(a) of the Commission's rules that “Affirmation of POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ENTERGY COMPANIES, Transfer of licenses for Indian Point 3 and FitzPatrick nuclear plants, Petitions to Intervene” be held on November 27, and on less than one week's notice to the notice.

By a vote of 5-0 on November 27, the Commission determined pursuant to U.S.C. 552b(e) and § 9.107(a) of the Commission's rules that “Affirmation of FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO., License Renewal Application for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4; Licensing Board Referral and Scheduling Order” be held on November 27, and on less than one week's notice to the public.

* * * * *

The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet at http://www.nrc.gov/​SECY/​smj/​schedule.htm

* * * * *

This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to it, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Attn: Operations Branch, Washington, DC 20555 (301-415-1661). In addition distribution of this meeting notice over the Internet system is available. If you are interested in receiving this Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send an electronic message to wmh@nrc.gov or dkw@nrc.gov.

Dated: December 1, 2000.

William M. Hill, Jr.,

SECY Tracking Officer, Office of the Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-31154 Filed 12-4-00; 12:19 pm]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-M