alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1207 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to reform the manner in which 

the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is audited by 

the Comptroller General of the United States and the manner in which 

such audits are reported, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2009 

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. KAGEN, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. 

JONES, Mr. REHBERG, Mr. POSEY, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. POE of 

Texas, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, and Ms. WOOLSEY) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to reform the manner 

in which the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System is audited by the Comptroller General of the 

United States and the manner in which such audits 

are reported, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Reserve 

5 Transparency Act of 2009’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1207 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUDIT REFORM AND TRANSPARENCY FOR THE 

2 BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RE3 SERVE SYSTEM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 714 of 

5 title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking all 

6 after ‘‘shall audit an agency’’ and inserting a period. 

7 (b) AUDIT.—Section 714 of title 31, United States 

8 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

9 subsection: 

10 ‘‘(e) AUDIT AND REPORT OF THE FEDERAL RE11 SERVE SYSTEM.— 

12 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The audit of the Board of 

13 Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the 

14 Federal reserve banks under subsection (b) shall be 

15 completed before the end of 2010. 

16 ‘‘(2) REPORT.— 

17 ‘‘(A) REQUIRED.—A report on the audit 

18 referred to in paragraph (1) shall be submitted 

19 by the Comptroller General to the Congress be20 fore the end of the 90-day period beginning on 

21 the date on which such audit is completed and 

22 made available to the Speaker of the House, the 

23 majority and minority leaders of the House of 

24 Representatives, the majority and minority 

25 leaders of the Senate, the Chairman and Rank26 ing Member of the committee and each subVerDate Nov 24 2008 01:01 Feb 28, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1207.IH H1207

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1207 IH

1 committee of jurisdiction in the House of Rep2 resentatives and the Senate, and any other 

3 Member of Congress who requests it. 

4 ‘‘(B) CONTENTS.—The report under sub5 paragraph (A) shall include a detailed descrip6 tion of the findings and conclusion of the 

7 Comptroller General with respect to the audit 

8 that is the subject of the report, together with 

9 such recommendations for legislative or admin10 istrative action as the Comptroller General may 

11 determine to be appropriate.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1333 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend chapter 40 of title 18, United States Code, to 

exempt the transportation, shipment, receipt, or importation of explosive materials for delivery to a federally 

recognized Indian tribe or an agency of such a tribe 

from various Federal criminal prohibitions relating to 

explosives. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1333 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF THE TRANSPORTATION, SHIP4 MENT, RECEIPT, OR IMPORTATION OF EX5 PLOSIVE MATERIALS FOR DELIVERY TO A 

6 FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBE OR 

7 AN AGENCY OF SUCH A TRIBE FROM VAR8 IOUS FEDERAL CRIMINAL PROHIBITIONS RE9 LATING TO EXPLOSIVES. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 845(a)(3) of title 18, 

11 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘to any agen12 cy of the United States or to any State or any political 

13 subdivision thereof’’ and inserting ‘‘to any agency of the 

14 United States, to any State or any political subdivision 

15 thereof, or to any federally recognized Indian tribe or 

16 agency thereof’’. 

17 (b) INDIAN TRIBE DEFINED.—Section 841 of such 

18 title is amended by adding at the end the following: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1333 RFS

1 ‘‘(t) ‘Indian tribe’ has the meaning given the 

2 term in section 102 of the Federally Recognized In3 dian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 479a).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
{"agency":"NCD","generated":"2017-04-06 07:52:43","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"}],"value":"2017"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["NCD"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":[" "]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":[" "]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":[" "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2017","quarter":"Q1"}
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of World Health Energy Holdings, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities
and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|Date: September 24, 2012 | By: | /s/ Liran Kosman       
|------------------------ | --- | -----------------------
|                         |     | Liran Kosman           
|                         |     | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1271 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1271

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 2351 West Atlantic Boulevard in Pompano Beach, Florida, as the 
              ``Elijah Pat Larkins Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2009

Mr. Hastings of Florida (for himself, Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida, Mr. 
    Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Klein of Florida, Mr. Meek of 
  Florida, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, and Mr. Wexler) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 2351 West Atlantic Boulevard in Pompano Beach, Florida, as the 
              ``Elijah Pat Larkins Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIJAH PAT LARKINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2351 West Atlantic Boulevard in Pompano Beach, Florida, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Elijah Pat Larkins Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Elijah Pat 
Larkins Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Notice is hereby given that, on April 20, 1999, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), VSI Alliance has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Prakash Bare (individual membership), San Jose, CA; EnThink, Inc., Santa Clara, CA; Hantro Products Oy, Oulu, FINLAND; Korea Electronic Technology Institute, Pyung Taek-Si, Kyung Gi-Do, SOUTH KOREA; Massana, Inc., Campbell, CA; TAEUS, Colorado Springs, CO; The Silicon Group, Inc., Austin, TX; and Worldwide Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp., Hsinchu, TAIWAN have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Ambit Design Systems, Inc., Austin, TX; Beijing Intelligent Electronics Co., Ltd., Beijing, PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA; CAE Plus, Inc., Austin, TX; Cygnus Solutions, Sunnyvale, CA; Duet Technologies, Inc., San Jose, CA; Exemplar Logic, Inc., Fremont, CA; FFC Limited (Fuji Facom Control), Tokyo, JAPAN; Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Labs, Camden, NJ; LTX Corp., Westwood, MA; Neuw Intellectual Property, Oldham, Lancs., UNITED KINGDOM; SIS Microelectronics, Inc., Longmont, CO; Spinnaker Systems, Inc., Tokyo, JAPAN; Vantis, Sunnyvale, CA; Wipro Ltd., Santa Clara, CA; and Yokogawa Electric Corp., Tokyo, JAPAN have been dropped as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and VSI Alliance intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On November 29, 1996, VSI Alliance filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 4, 1997 (62 FR 9812).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 11, 1999. A notice has not yet been published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-3123  Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
k I UitniA mxak 

### }iu <Jo/5~ 

### t^iApaok * oi- it-oofl*-- ^l

~Jxiai Cmy* MSHlb. 

### WotS7o_J)&d#> AnpiaL i^fiWi M< iJlrO Coud" •' 

## £anu.5 t&cr jyvdiL 

### 'ty+KUhGoK' ; &^hiLd<uJr a (02O/t- 

### (\um.~-k>ik (jjJm do* ~tk moLrtf

^o\^

RECEIVED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS I© 09 2015

~ Absl Aeosta, Glerk •~ 

## N/A(VtefteAJKrijJM -fj\o V ^ dill ti "MiuffOu t p. JJhjJ^'JMM^ • U ^ ... 

### t

doJr Kao 6l CJ* D31^fl £i*J3..



### looiJ Lawr sir (^ohjio ItfJQZ. FILED IN XOURTOFCRIMINAtrAPPEALS -FEB~t1-^" Abel Acosta, CierKV4jlr *>* 

### milicdiuL a/ Mjte<tW~J\tdc!X8tioL^ 

# v/ ^A "/|L kDsjssU- ^ J)jUMj)io- X/JL^ro Cause-, """^u&f dowrtrp <=yj(v WMfi dvdu. OucIJud ow£ Quik&wid~



## &tt Ajap&k^k WJl tko dicJkofi&~• ^J"Mai /jjlMx Jwfv^ Coibnutd -ULutL chd -sad Acfe Qal Uua W cmoh. U v 

### f , £ot< 

## (j^uL^^dih&LJ

, j)(f-fWcAf ^o Si lOD jJ_Lfo\MLr 5r (fOhjio trldm.^i %\oi

### tji^du {&tt-Mud Ar.(ZJtiscJ iiJfrX..^.M- J?v' (Mj3*J»(,^w.dj>.Z£,lfafyrJoif dfj M ^StAutUL U,

a. 

### ifou. mcL Crnit^ C.&ptU Jih. &k>(X. jbijjtidllux&waxd&C 

## ^h. jftflb ~*Qd® % M, tiL-tha 41*ofofof 4*Lf^ . doi*. dcJ^^iZ^ J\n^U Vyatl\<v 'hag, *P<iascL 

### jkjk^r^-v$4<

ah* b3i4hf\ hcS * /**q

loo kJ UmrSt. ft, -.Qorihyt 1 (tIQI-
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-3 (No. 333-108710) and Form S-8 (Nos.333-125809, 333-117963, 333-105579, 333-105578, 333-90402, 333-74838,333-60408, 333-59272, 333-88835, 333-79241, 333-28481, 333-28527,033-99540, 033-50678, 033-46165) of MedImmune, Inc. of our reportdated March  9, 2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

McLean, Virginia

March 9, 2006
Kalmin D. Smith 

Mayor 

Jon Bayless 

City Administrator 

grand-ledge.com 

City of Grand Ledge 

200 E.Jefferson St. 

Grand Ledge MI 48837 <517) 627-2149:; 

February 9, 2012 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 

Washington, D.C. 20590. 

-„=Re: Sun Country-Slot.Exemption - Docket-Number FAA-2012-0p89__ 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

"0 

V J U 

c7-3 ' 

Sun Country Airlines has requested an exemption fro m the slot limit for Ronald Reagan Washington 

National Airport (DCA) set forth in § 93.123(a), to permit the FAA t o create air carrier slots during 

certain limited hours for Sun Country's use. The proposed air carrier slots woul d replace tw o slot 

exemptions under DOT Order 2010-12-16 awarded to Sun Country. On January 6, 2012, the United 

States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the DOT Order, and Sun Country 

will lose its existing service between DCA and Lansing's Capital Region International Airport. 

Specifically, Sun Country desires one daily slot during each of the 1000 and 1100 hours. The proposed 

exemption woul d permit Sun Country to continue operating its existing services and avoid an 

inequitable result of the Court's order. 

The City of Grand Ledge is located ten miles west of Lansing. Man y residents of our City are 

dependent upon the Lansing airport for business and recreational travel including-travei to 

Washington, D.C. using the Sun Country daily service.; Indeed, we consider the Sun Country DCA 

service t o be essential to the,economic growth of the Greater Lansing Region.including Grand Ledge. 

The daily service is the only large aircraft (737-800) service t o Washington Reagan Airport, in the state 

of Michigan outside of Detroit. Prior t o Sun Country, the regional communit y had requested the 

injroduction^of this service from numerous other airline operators withou t success. Accordingly, jtj s 

critical that the FAA take'the necessary steps t o ensure"~the continuation"'of the Sun Country'slots^at 

the established flight times in support of Greater Lansing's business and economic grovrth. 

Your immediate approval.of thir. exemption, so that Sun Country can begin t o enter flight schedules 

for sale for the balance.of 2012, will be greatly appreciated. ,• . 

Sincerely, , . • , . • ,.: . • '. . ,.. .' •• .. -

^'... r.;j.j i ^ ^ .;; ;;^ f ;n , r:,:> vi.:.: [ iV; v: !,•..: jui , h'.L^L.r: -:.n 

Kalmin,D.Smith,-ph.D.'. . ._• 

Mayor-; ; .. . •• (• I. .:. \ : 

! '' ' 

Citi/dftheSt'Deti li^iands - Estabiished 7393
| **EXHIBIT 32.2** |
|------------------|

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trimol Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

 

 
|   | /s/ Jack Braverman      |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Jack Braverman          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | TRIMOL GROUP, INC.      |

 

 

 

May 16, 2005

 

22

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SS&C Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
officers of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     Date: May 6, 2004          By: /s/ William C. Stone

                                William C. Stone
                                Chief Executive Officer

     Date: May 6, 2004          By: /s/ Patrick J. Pedonti

                                Patrick J. Pedonti
                                Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q
pursuant to Item 601(b) (32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-Q.
#### HARROD v. STATE.

No. 14585.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 10, 1932.

*324Oxford & McMillan, of Stephenville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, P. J.

Unlawfully transporting intoxication liquor is the offense; penalty assesfeed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years and six months.

Prom the state’s testimony the following in substance appears: Harrod, his wife, and one Fitzpatrick, were in an automobile, on the public road and were arrested with whisky in their car. Without reciting the state’s testimony, it is sufficient to support 'the verdict of the jury. Evidence was introduced to the effect that the whisky in question was for medicinal purposes for the appellant and his wife. This defensive theory was also supported by a physician.

An application for a continuance was made and overruled. The absent witness was H. W. Fitzpatrick. His testimony would have been in substance as follows: While repairing a flat tire a man appeared who sold the appellant a gallon' which, at the time, the appellant stated was for medicinal purposes for himself and his wife. When the officers appeared, appellant stated that they were high-jackers and quickened the speed of his automobile. He was pursued by the officers, and in the pursuit the jars were accidently broken due tp the roughness of the ' road. When appellant realized that his pursuers were officers, he surrendered.

In behalf of the state, the flight of the appellant was attributed to guilty knowledge. The presence of the broken jars and whisky in his car indicated an attempt to suppress the evidence. Fitzpatrick’s testimony was relevant and material to meet the contention of the state on the points mentioned, and also as to the manner and purpose of the acquisition of the whisky.

Prom the bill of exception and the application for a continuance, it is made to appear that appellant used sufficient diligence in causing process to issue for the witnesses, including Fitzpatrick, who at the time was at his home in Hico, Hamilton county, Tex. Subpoena was promptly placed in the hands of the sheriff and returned the following day showing service upon the said Fitzpatrick. When the case was called for trial, Fitzpatrick did not appear, and the appellant then, for the first time, was advised by the sheriff that his return showing service on Fitzpatrick was a mistake. In the motion for new trial, the overruling of the motion for a continuance was made the subject of complaint. Attached to the motion was the affidavit of Fitzpatrick explaining his absence and confirming the averments in the application touching his testimony.

Regarding the diligence to secure the witness Fitzpatrick adequate and the testimony material, we are constrained to consider the action of the trial court in overruling the motion such error as requires a reversal of the judgment.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.