alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ROBERTS v. STATE.

No. 20105.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 25, 1939.

H. P. Shead, of Longview, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for driving an automobile upon the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us with a statement of facts that reflect the guilt of appellant of the offense of driving an automobile upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The indictment appears regular, and the proof was evident. There are no bills of exception in the record, hence no matter of procedure is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SHCEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE 12 MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 FILED ON
FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,248
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,974
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,041
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,415
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,667
<OTHER-SE>                                    (48,893)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,189
<SALES>                                         91,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,684
<CGS>                                            3,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,932
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,830
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,163
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,977
<INCOME-TAX>                                       382
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,595
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,595
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
ALL CONTENTS,
IER ELECTRONIC DEVICES

IRABAND OF ANY KIND (WEAPONS, DRUGS, ALCOHOL, ETC) ARE
SES,

NO GANG COLORS, APPARE IA, OR REFERENCES. THE YTC IS A.
|ATION MUST STAY OUTSIDE

NEUTRAL LOCATION. ANY GANG AFF

(ONE USAGE UNLESS APPROVED AND MONITORED BY YTC

S WILL, BE MADE TO ARRANGE TRANSPORTATION OR IN AN

8:00am ~ 6:00pm

1:00am — 7:00pm

6:00pm ~ 9:00pm
Emergency telephone contact is available
24 hours a day
{401) 440-9273

For more information or to make a refet

Tides Family’ S es

790 Broad Street 790 Broad Street
Providence, RI 02903 REO2903
) 467-8888 j (401). 467-8888



he YTC is a unique collaboration between a
community-base: ice agency Tides Family
Services and the Dept. of Children, Youth and

Families (DCYF). A partner agency supporting t!
collaborative effort is The Institute for the Study and

Practice of Non-Violence.

The Goal of the YTC is to maintain an emphasis

‘on strengthening families within the community by
u acking, on-site programming,
and active ation with juvenile Probation.
Stakeholder Partners include, but are not limited

to; Caritas, Whitmarsh, AS220, etc. The YTC uses
a community-based outreach and tracking model in
connection with an Intensive Supervision Program

Model with

ing outreach and

mediate and graduated sanctions.

Youth on Probation or eligible 2arly release
from the Rhode Island Training School who are
considered high-risk for:

* Probation violations

* Continued offending or unsafe behaviors

* Sentence or return to the RITS

rom diverse backgrou
+ Males or females aged 13 ~ 18
* Living in Providence or nearby Cranston

| intensive Sug dels of Probation

were develop
Delinquency (CCD).

Community-based counseling
Substance Abuse Treatment

Crisis intervention

Gang education & Nonviolence training
Outreach & Tracking

Case management

Community Service/Restorative Justice
Connection to Community Supports

Educational Advocacy
Tutorial Support

GED Placement
Completion of Diploma-G
CCRI ~ Support Services
AS220 Mentoring

Job readiness

RI New Harvest Kitchen Project

ting Programs

24 hour Supervision

Home confinement

Face-to-Face contact 6 times weekly
(4 times weekly at YTC Building)
Participation in at least one YTC group
Compliance with clinical services
‘articipation in Restorati
Service Program
Recreational acti

Nightly tr

ve Justice/Commu

gat home

Face-to-Face contact 5 times weekly

at YTC Building)
Participation in at least one YTC group
Comp!
Participation
Service Program
Recreational activities
Nightly tracking at

inical services

Face-to-Face contact 3 times weekly
{in once weekly)

Participation in at least one YTC group
Com
Par
Service Program
Program

Recreational activities
Nightly tracking at home

ce with clinical serv

‘Commu

pation in Restorative Justic
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1732 

AN ACT 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to promote 

testing of incentive payments for behavioral health providers for adoption and use of certified electronic health 

record technology. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1732 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Access to 

3 Behavioral Health Information Technology Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TESTING OF INCENTIVE PAYMENTS FOR BEHAV5 IORAL HEALTH PROVIDERS FOR ADOPTION 

6 AND USE OF CERTIFIED ELECTRONIC 

7 HEALTH RECORD TECHNOLOGY. 

8 Section 1115A(b)(2)(B) of the Social Security Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 1315a(b)(2)(B)) is amended by adding at the 

10 end the following new clause: 

11 ‘‘(xxv) Providing incentive payments 

12 to behavioral health providers for the adop13 tion and use of certified electronic health 

14 record technology (as defined in section 

15 1848(o)(4)) to improve the quality and co16 ordination of care through the electronic 

17 documentation and exchange of health in18 formation. Behavioral health providers may 

19 include— 

20 ‘‘(I) psychiatric hospitals (as de21 fined in section 1861(f)); 

22 ‘‘(II) community mental health 

23 centers (as defined in section 

24 1861(ff)(3)(B)); 

25 ‘‘(III) clinical psychologists (as 

26 defined in section 1861(ii)); 
3 

†S 1732 ES

1 ‘‘(IV) clinical social workers (as 

2 defined in section 1861(hh)(1)); and 

3 ‘‘(V) hospitals, treatment facili4 ties, and mental health or substance 

5 use disorder providers that participate 

6 in a State plan under title XIX or a 

7 waiver of such plan.’’. 

Passed the Senate May 7, 2018. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1732 

AN ACT 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to 

certified electronic health record technology. ioral health providers for adoption and use of promote testing of incentive payments for behav-
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Herminio Vargas, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Cohen, J.), rendered July 29, 1988, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of *AV2*to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

We find no merit to defendant’s unpreserved claims that the contraband recovered from his accomplice was inadmissible proof of uncharged drug sales and that the court should have given limiting instructions. Defendant was arrested after the sale of cocaine in a routine "buy-and-bust” operation, where according to the undercover officer, defendant led the officer to the actual seller of narcotics, accepted the buy money, and transferred the cocaine to the undercover officer. Defendant’s accomplice, who had previously pleaded guilty, testified at trial, admitting his guilt and exculpating defendant. While the trial court did dismiss the possession count predicated on the narcotics recovered from the accomplice’s person, the court nevertheless allowed the narcotics to be introduced into evidence as probative of the police officer’s credibility. Defendant, while he objected, never argued that the evidence constituted proof of uncharged crimes, and for this reason it is unnecessary to review defendant’s unpreserved claim.

Neither was defendant deprived of a fair trial by any of the prosecutor’s comments on summation. Defendant urges that the prosecutor improperly suggested that defendant was involved in other sales, but no objection was raised when the prosecutor urged that defendant was a salesman, and the argument was reasonably related to the evidence of the relationship between defendant and his accomplice. The prosecutor did not err when he said the simple issue facing the jury was whether defendant acted in concert with La Boy. By the same token, the prosecutor’s observation that either the police witnesses or La Boy was lying was apt, in view of the defense counsel’s argument in summation that the officers had lied. Concur—Carro, J. P., Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1979 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1979

   To block the implementation of certain presidential actions that 
 restrict individuals from certain countries from entering the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 18, 2017

 Mr. Murphy (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Leahy, Mrs. Murray, Mr. 
Blumenthal, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Franken, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. 
    Schatz, Mr. Booker, Mr. Markey, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Harris, Mr. 
   Schumer, Ms. Warren, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Reed, Mr. 
    Menendez, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Carper, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Coons, Ms. 
 Klobuchar, Ms. Hirono, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Brown, 
and Mr. Durbin) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To block the implementation of certain presidential actions that 
 restrict individuals from certain countries from entering the United 
                                States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that Executive Order 13780 and the presidential 
proclamation issued on September 24, 2017--
            (1) violate the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
        1101 et seq.), which states that no person can be discriminated 
        against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the 
        person's race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of 
        residence; and
            (2) violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment 
        to the United States Constitution and the equal protection 
        component of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to 
        the United States Constitution.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST USE OF FUNDS.

    No funds, resources, or fees made available to the Secretary of 
Homeland Security, or to any other official of a Federal agency, by 
this Act or any other Act for any fiscal year, may be used to implement 
or enforce Executive Order 13780, signed on March 6, 2017, or the 
presidential proclamation issued on September 24, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
#### L. G. AVERY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. Florence L. AVERY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

Nos. 9108, 9109.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 5, 1940.

Dana Latham, of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners.

Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before GARRECHT, DENMAN, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties that these causes abide final decision in companion cause, M. N. Avery v. Com’r of Internal Revenue, in which judgment was entered on April 12, 1940, 9 Cir., 111 F.2d 19, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered judgment filed in each cause and entered in the minutes in accordance with the decision of this court in said companion M. N. Avery case, and that the mandate, of this court in each cause issue forthwith.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

 
              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
Number 33-80615 on Form S-8 of BENCHMARQ Microelectronics, Inc., and in the
related Prospectus of our report dated January 27, 1997 (except for Note 10, as 
to which the date is February 18, 1997), with respect to the financial
statements and schedule of BENCHMARQ Microelectronics, Inc., included in the
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                                        Ernst & Young LLP

Dallas, Texas
February 24, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       8,282,683
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             8,050,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 14,590,571
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      18,137,427
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        18,213,864
<LOANS>                                     73,692,330
<ALLOWANCE>                                    738,353
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             126,527,319
<DEPOSITS>                                 111,448,328
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,280,586
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            852,650
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,944,870
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,000,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             126,527,319
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,181,220
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,412,798
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             8,594,018
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,830,713
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,830,713
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,763,305
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  340,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              11,269
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,849,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,005,713
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,005,713
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,005,713
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.39
<LOANS-NON>                                    528,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    14,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               595,593
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  248,855
<RECOVERIES>                                    51,615
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              738,353
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           738,353
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Webb Interactive Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lindley S. Branson, Vice President  General Counsel, the Companys principal executive and principal financial
officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Lindley S. BransonVice President  General Counsel (Principal Executive and Principal FinancialOfficer)




Date: November 21, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1293 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1293

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 29, 2009

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase in 
the amount payable by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to veterans for 
   improvements and structural alterations furnished as part of home 
                            health services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disabled Veterans Home Improvement 
and Structural Alteration Grant Increase Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN AMOUNT AVAILABLE TO DISABLED VETERANS FOR 
              IMPROVEMENTS AND STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS FURNISHED AS PART 
              OF HOME HEALTH SERVICES.

    (a) Increase.--Section 1717(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``$4,100'' and 
        inserting ``$6,800''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``$1,200'' and 
        inserting ``$2,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to a veteran who first applies for benefits under 
section 1717(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, on or after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Applicability.--A veteran who exhausts such veteran's 
eligibility for benefits under section 1717(a)(2) of title 38, United 
States Code, before the date of the enactment of this Act, is not 
entitled to additional benefits under such section by reason of the 
amendments made by subsection (a).

            Passed the House of Representatives July 28, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### i^yL- ^

UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTIO N FEDERA LAVIATIO NADMINISTRATIO N

WASHINGTON , D.C
. J«& B ENTERPRISES , INC
. dlj/a
. RHYTH M FA A Docke t No : 16-08-0 7 SHINE , Complainant , MMMM I Wm m 

# i^^-^Tj^iP l METROPOLITA NNASHVILL EAIRPOR T AUTHORITY , Respondent
.


### NOTIC E O F CHANG E O F ADDRES S Pursuan t t o 1 4 CF R§ 16.13(f) , Attorne y for Responden t

Metropolita nNashvill e Airport Authority , Arthu r

P
. Berg , hereb y submit s thi s Notic e o f Chang e o f

Chang e o f

Address
. Effectiv e immediately , th e contac t informatio nfor

Mr
. Ber g i s a s follows : Arthu r P
. Ber g KAPLA NKIRSC H & ROCKWEL LLL P,-- , 64 1 Lexingto nAve. , Suit e 140 9 : g New York , N Y 1002 2 O ) Telephone : (212)328-951 5 <r^ Facsimile : (646)514-544 0 E-mail : aberg@kaplankirsch.co m Respectfull y submitte dthi s 6thda y o f November , 2008 : 

# Gs.«-KtX LisaA
. Reynold s KAPLA NKIRSC H & ROCKWEL LLL P 167 5 Broadway , Suit e 230 0 Denver , C O 8020 2 . • . ••:j': >

— I ~C i
C DCERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E

I hereb y certif

y tha t I hav e thi s da y serve datru e cop y o f th e foregoin g Notic e of

Chang e o f Addres s o nth e followin g partie s at th e followin g addresse s b y U.S
. Mai l thi s 6*' ^ day o f November , 2008 : Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l ATTN : FA A Part

1 6 Airport

Proceeding s Docket , AG C Roo m92 5 Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D C 2059 1 61 0

Anthon y W
. Robinso n Blain e A'mmo nWhit e MBELDE F 110 0 Mercantil e Lane , Suit e 115- A Largo , M D 2077 4 Raymon dG
. Prince , Esquir e Tennesse e Litigatio nCounse l PRINC E&
. HELLINGER , P.C
. 15 0 Secon dAvenu e North , Suit e 30 0 Nashville , Tennesse e 37201-190 2 Sharo nLon g Airport s an dEnvironmenta l Law Divisio n Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 

## USC ^ 

# l^J^ ^ Lis aA
. Reynolds , Counse l for

Responden t

Metropolita n Nashvill e Airport

Authorit y