alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION*
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of
operations of the Corporation and its subsidiaries.
 /s/ Bruce D. Parker
    
    /s/ Ray L. DruseikisBruce D. Parker
    
    Ray L. DruseikisChairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and President
    
    Vice President of Finance and
Controller; Interim Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and
SecretaryDated:  November 13, 2007
    
    Dated:  November 13, 2007
 *
    This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certification
vshall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Corporation
specifically incorporates this certification by reference into any such filing.
 33
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76278-76279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Approved Amendment to Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 
1988, Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved Tribal-State 
Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on 
Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, Department

[[Page 76279]]

of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has approved the 
Amended Tribal-State Compact for Regulation of Class III Gaming between 
the Coquille Indian Tribe and the State of Oregon which was executed on 
November 15, 2000.

DATES: This action is effective December 6, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 
20240, (202) 219-4066.

    Dated: November 27, 2000.
Kevin Gover,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 00-31026 Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2498

SIRAJ SHEIKH,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES A. GEISLER,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

JAMES F. O'CONNOR; INVEST IN AMERICA, L.P.;

INTERBANK CORPORATE SERVICES, INCORPORATED;

DOMINION INDUSTRIES, L.L.C.; MARKET MAKERS,

L.L.C.; ILENE MARIE HARRISON; JOHN L. CRINER,

II; STEVEN R. MAIMON; INTERBANK IMMIGRATION

SERVICES, INCORPORATED; ATLANTIC FOREX,

LIMITED; INTELLINET CORPORATE SERVICES,

INCORPORATED,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-99-1974-A)

Submitted: May 24, 2001 Decided: June 1, 2001

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James A. Geisler, Appellant Pro Se. David Alan Hirsch, VAN GILS &

HIRSCH, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

James A. Geisler appeals the district court’s orders denying

his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 and entering judgment for the

Plaintiff following a jury trial in this civil action. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that

the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to

grant Geisler’s motion for a new trial. Chesapeake Paper Products

Co. v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp., 51 F.3d 1229, 1237. We

decline to review Geisler’s claims challenging the district court’s

denial of his pretrial motion to dismiss. Id. at 1234-37. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2133 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to authorize the Secretary of 

Agriculture to enter into alternative funding arrangements with certain 

community irrigation associations and community land grants. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2017 

Mr. UDALL (for himself and Mr. HEINRICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to authorize the 

Secretary of Agriculture to enter into alternative funding 

arrangements with certain community irrigation associations and community land grants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Land Grants 

5 and Acequias Conservation and Environmental Services 

6 Act’’ or the ‘‘PLACES Act’’. 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2133 IS

1 SEC. 2. ALTERNATIVE FUNDING ARRANGEMENTS FOR COM2 MUNITY IRRIGATION ASSOCIATIONS AND 

3 COMMUNITY LAND GRANTS. 

4 Section 1244 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 

5 U.S.C. 3844) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(m) ALTERNATIVE FUNDING ARRANGEMENTS FOR

8 COMMUNITY IRRIGATION ASSOCIATIONS AND COMMUNITY

9 LAND GRANTS.— 

10 ‘‘(1) DEFINITION OF ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—In 

11 this subsection, the term ‘eligible entity’ means an 

12 entity that, as determined by the Secretary— 

13 ‘‘(A) is comprised of members who are pro14 ducers that are eligible for payments under the 

15 environmental quality incentives program estab16 lished under chapter 4 of subtitle D; and 

17 ‘‘(B) is a local governmental entity that 

18 does not have the authority to impose taxes or 

19 levies. 

20 ‘‘(2) ALTERNATIVE FUNDING ARRANGE21 MENTS.—The Secretary may enter into an alter22 native funding arrangement under any conservation 

23 program administered by the Secretary with an eligi24 ble entity if the Secretary determines that— 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2133 IS

1 ‘‘(A) the goals and objectives of the appli2 cable program will be met by the arrangement; 

3 and 

4 ‘‘(B) statutory limitations regarding con5 tracts with individual producers will not be ex6 ceeded by any member of the eligible entity. 

7 ‘‘(3) TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ASSIST8 ANCE.—The Secretary may provide technical and 

9 administrative assistance, as mutually agreed by the 

10 parties, under an alternative funding arrangement 

11 entered into under paragraph (2).’’. 

Æ 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
#### Marie FURST, etc., v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 9407.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 29, 1940.

Jeffrey Heiman and John Sullivan, both of Seattle, Wash., for appellant.

J. Charles Dennis, U. S. Atty., and Gerald Schucklin, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Seattle, Wash., for appellee.

Before WILBUR, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered judgment herein affirmed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and mandate issue forthwith.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1365 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to require a store in which a consumer 

may apply to open a credit or charge card account to display a sign, 

at each location where the application may be made, containing the 

same information required by such Act to be prominently placed in 

a tabular format on the application. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2009 

Mr. WEINER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to require a store 

in which a consumer may apply to open a credit or 

charge card account to display a sign, at each location 

where the application may be made, containing the same 

information required by such Act to be prominently 

placed in a tabular format on the application. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1365 IH

1 SECTION 1. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT FOR STORES AC2 CEPTING CREDIT AND CHARGE CARD AC3 COUNT APPLICATIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 122 of the Truth in Lend5 ing Act (15 U.S.C. 1632) is amended by adding at the 

6 end the following: 

7 ‘‘(d) SIGNS REQUIRED ON CERTAIN PREMISES

8 WHERE CREDIT OR CHARGE CARD ACCOUNT APPLICA9 TIONS ACCEPTED.— 

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A person who sells personal 

11 property to consumers on a business premises and 

12 makes available to consumers on such premises any 

13 application to open a credit card account under an 

14 open end consumer credit plan, or any application to 

15 open a charge card account, shall display in the 

16 premises on a sign any information that is subject 

17 to subsection (c) and that is required to be disclosed 

18 by the person on that application. 

19 ‘‘(2) FORMAT.—Such information shall be dis20 played on the sign in the form and manner which 

21 the Board shall prescribe by regulations and which, 

22 to the extent practicable and appropriate, shall be 

23 consistent with the form and manner required for 

24 the disclosure of such information on the credit or 

25 charge card application. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1365 IH

1 ‘‘(3) SIGN PLACEMENT.—Such signs shall be 

2 conspicuously placed at each location on the prem3 ises where the credit or charge card application may 

4 be submitted by the consumer.’’. 

5 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 111(e) of 

6 the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1610(e)) is amended 

7 by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘Section 122(d) shall supersede State laws relating 

9 to store display of the information that is subject to the 

10 requirements of such section, except that any State may 

11 employ or establish State laws for the purpose of enforcing 

12 the requirements of such section.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. 1993 Long-Term Incentive Plan on Form S-8 (File No.
33-60840) of our report dated February 2, 1998, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule
of Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996,
and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, which report is
included as an exhibit to Form 10-K.



Memphis, Tennessee                                  COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
March 23, 1998





<PAGE>   2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan on Form S-8 (File No.
33-43614) of our report dated February 2, 1998, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule
of Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996
and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, which report is
included as an exhibit to Form 10-K.

                                COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Memphis, Tennessee
March 23, 1998





<PAGE>   3




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan on Form S-8 (File No.
33-43597) of our report dated February 2, 1998, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule
of Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996
and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, which report is
included as an exhibit to Form 10-K.



                                                     COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Memphis, Tennessee
March 23, 1998
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements 
of Ross Systems. Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 33-42036, 33-48226, 33-58584, 
33-72108, and 33-89128) and Forms S-3 (File Nos. 33-89504 and 333-19619) of 
our report dated August 21, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial 
statements and financial statement schedules of Ross Systems, Inc. as of 
June 30, 1997 and 1996, and for the years ended June 30, 1997 and 1996, which 
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the 
references to our firm under the caption "Experts."

                                      Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Atlanta, Georgia
September 26, 1997
Schaeffer, John 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Lin, Chuantung 

Thursday, April 24! 2014 2:46 PM 

Schaeffer, John 

Williamson, Tracy;LChristian, Myrta 

RE: HPV 3 Test R le Data Submission 5026-74-4 

HiJohn, I 

I 

Sorry to miss that. Yes. After look at the HPLC measured data, it is OK to accept this measured Log Kow data 

from the surogate for the HPV 3 test chemical. 

Daniel 

From: Schaeffer, John 

Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 2:34 PM 

To: Lin, Chuantung 

Cc: Williamson, Tracy; Christian, Myrta 

Subject: RE: HPV 3 Test Ru le Data Submission 5026-74-4 

Daniel, 

It looks like they did it both ways- take a lookJ at the pdf attachment again ·- it looks like they used the HPLC method for 

the surrogate chemical 

Thanks, 

John 

John Schaeffer 

Senior Biologist 

USEPA/OPPT/CCO/CITB 

1201 Constitution Ave, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Mail Code: 7 405M 

Phone:202-564-8173
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135789 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135789 

 COA: 282615 

Van Buren CC: 01-012455-FC 

ADAM NEAL SULLENDER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 3, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting 

statement in People v Houlihan, 480 Mich 1165 (2008). 

d0616 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 23, 2008 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                    68,979,963
<SECURITIES>                              13,174,192
<RECEIVABLES>                              1,047,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                2,671,284
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          86,163,566
<PP&E>                                     6,471,046
<DEPRECIATION>                             2,691,367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            90,507,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      4,987,464
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                     157,060
<OTHER-SE>                                85,363,294
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              90,507,818
<SALES>                                      846,046
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             846,046
<CGS>                                        753,380
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              7,892,545
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (600,937)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (7,198,942)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (7,198,942)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                             (7,198,942)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.50)



</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 27, 2024

NO. 03-24-00200-CV

S. E., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES SMITH AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on February 22, 2024. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. Because appellant is 

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 27, 2009 

p0120 

Order 

 

January 27, 2009 

137306 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137306 

 COA: 286559 

Wayne CC: 87-004374-FC 

JOHNNIE DAVID WHITT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 20, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



The Manager and Member
DaimlerChrysler Services North America LLC:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-73570) on Form S-3 of CARCO Auto Loan Master Trust (the "Trust") of our
report dated March 20, 2003, relating to the statements of assets, liabilities
and equity arising from cash transactions of the Trust as of December 31, 2002
and 2001, and the related statements of cash receipts and disbursements for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report
appears in the December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of the Trust.

Our report dated March 20, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph stating that
the financial statements were prepared on the basis of cash receipts and
disbursements, which is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.



/s/  KPMG LLP

Detroit, Michigan
March 28, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1366 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1366

  To protect innocent parties from certain fees imposed by depository 
      institutions for dishonored checks, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2009

  Mr. Weiner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To protect innocent parties from certain fees imposed by depository 
      institutions for dishonored checks, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Innocent Check Depositor Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN CHECK DISHONORMENT FEES PROHIBITED.

    (a) In General.--Section 607 of the Expedited Funds Availability 
Act (12 U.S.C. 4006) (relating to miscellaneous provisions) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Fees on Dishonored Checks.--
            ``(1) Receiving depository institution.--In the case of a 
        check drawn on an account at an originating institution which 
        is dishonored by the originating institution due to the lack of 
        sufficient funds in such account to pay the check, a receiving 
        depository institution may not impose any fee on the depositor, 
        in connection with such check, due to such dishonorment.
            ``(2) Rule of construction.--No provision of this section 
        shall be construed as affecting any intervening depository 
        institution or the costs of the services provided by such 
        depository institution.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
after the end of the 180-day period beginning on the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.37


 


THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE

TRIMAS CORPORATION

2006 LONG TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


Pursuant to Section 11.8
of the TriMas Corporation 2006 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan (the “2006
Equity Plan”) and resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of TriMas
Corporation (the “Corporation”) on February 28, 2008, the 2006 Equity Plan
is hereby amended as set forth below, subject to Stockholder approval on May 2,
2008.


 


Effective May 2,
2008, upon receipt of Stockholder approval to increase the number of shares
reserved for issuance under the 2006 Equity Plan by 235,877, Section 1.7
of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


 


1.7           Stock.


 


(a)           Effective May 2, 2008, the
Corporation has reserved 1,435,877 shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock for
issuance pursuant to stock-based Awards. 
Up to 500,000 of the aggregate reserved shares may be granted as
Incentive Stock Options under the Plan. 
All provisions of this Section 1.7 shall be adjusted, as
applicable, in accordance with Article X.


 


This THIRD
Amendment to the TriMas Corporation 2006 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan is
hereby adopted on the 2nd day of May, 2008.


 


 


	
   

  	
  TRIMAS
  CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Joshua
  A. Sherbin

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Joshua A.
  Sherbin

  
	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
  Vice
  President, Secretary and General Counsel