alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regus Agreement                          Virtual Office, Virtual Office
Ireland                                   Plus Mailbox Plus & Telephone

Product of Interest

[ ] Mailbox Plus: Use of our prestigious address for receipt of mail.
[ ] Telephone Answering: Telephone answering in your company's name
during business hours and 24/7 voicemail services.
[x] Virtual Office: Telephone answering in your company's name, fax and
mail handling and use of our prestigious address
[ ] Virtual Office Plus:  Same as Virtual Office with 40 hours of
office usage.

Client Details (not a Regus Center address)
Company Name:  Kodiak International, Inc.  Contact Name:  Henry Bush
Title/Job Title:  President                Address:  19 DunDrum Gate
Post/Zipcode:  Dublin 15                   City:  Dublin
Country:  FIRE                          Phone number:  003 538 242 3343
Email Address: Kodiak@bluechipmanagement.com  Fax number 0870 1330 506

Center Details - Specify the Regus center(s) for your address
Dublin, 2 Pembroke House
Street/Floor   Upper Pembroke Street 28-32
City   Dublin 2
ZipCode  Ireland

Telephone Call Handling (not applicable fore Mailbox Plus, extra fees
may apply)
Please answer my calls in the following Company name:_________________

And then handle each call as follows:  [x]Always take messages [ ]
Forward directly without intervention [x] Any messages taken should be
forwarded to me by: [x] email [ ]voicemail
Phone Number:             Email Address:

Mail and Fax Handling (not applicable to Telephone Answering, extra
fees may apply)
[ ] My mail and faxes will be held at the center.  I am responsible for
picking up my mail and faxes, OR [x] Forward my mail:  [ ] Daily [x]
Weekly [ ] Monthly [ ] Forward my mail by: [ ] Mail [ ] Courier
[x] Forward my faxes*:  [ ] Daily [x] Weekly [ ] Monthly [ ] Forward my
faxes by: [ ] Fax [ ] Mail [ ] Courier

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Program Details  [x] 12 months  [ ] 6 months   [ ] 3 months
Length of Agreement Start date (DD/MM/YY): 15-May-08  End date
(DD/MM/YY): 30-Jun-09
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Registration Fee  Monthly Fee  VAT (21%)  Total     Retainer (2x monthly fee)  TOTAL

                  <c>          <c>      <c>         <c>                      <c>
E 99.0          E 249.00        E 73.08   E 421.08    E 498.00                E 919.08
</TABLE>



Signature

I understand that service charges may be incurred in relation to the
provision of this Agreement which will be charged at the end of each
month and I apply for a Virtual Office subject to the Standard Terms
and Conditions which I have read, understood and accept.

Signature  /s/Henry Bush           Date (DD/MM/YY)  13-05-08
SUBSIDIARIES OF WILMINGTON TRUST CORPORATION
 Jurisdiction ofSubsidiary
    
    IncorporationWilmington Trust Company
    
    DelawareBrandywine Finance Corporation
    
    DelawareBrandywine Insurance Agency, Inc.
    
    DelawareCompton Realty Corporation
    
    DelawareRodney Square Investors, L.P.
    
    DelawareSiobain-VI, LLC
    
    DelawareWilmington Brokerage Services Company
    
    DelawareWilmington Trust (Cayman) Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsWilmington Trust SP Services (New York), Inc.
    
    Delaware100 West Tenth Street Corp
    
    DelawareWilmington Trust SP Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareSpecial Services (Delaware), Inc.
    
    DelawareWilmington Trust SP Services (Delaware), Inc.
    
    DelawareWilmington Trust SP Services (Nevada), Inc.
    
    NevadaWilmington Trust SP Services (South Carolina), Inc.
    
    South CarolinaWilmington Trust SP Services (Vermont), Inc.
    
    VermontWilmington SP Services (California), Inc.
    
    CaliforniaWT Community Investments, Inc.
    
    DelawareWTC Camden, Inc.
    
    DelawareWilmington Trust FSB
    
    United StatesWilmington Trust Retirement and Institutional Services Company
    
    DelawareWilmington Trust Fiduciary Services Company
    
    New JerseyWTFSB Properties, LLC
    
    DelawareWilmington Trust Investment Management, LLC
    
    GeorgiaWT Investments, Inc.
    
    DelawareGTBA Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareGrant, Tani, Barash & Altman Management, Inc.
    
    DelawareWilmington Family Office, Inc.
    
    DelawareRodney Square Management Corporation
    
    DelawareWilmington Trust (U.K.) Limited
    
    United KingdomSPV Advisors Limited
    
    United KingdomWilmington Trust (London) Limited
    
    United KingdomWilmington Trust SP Services (London) Limited
    
    United KingdomBedell SPV Management (Jersey) Limited
    
    JerseySPV Management Limited (Shell)
    
    United KingdomWilmington Trust SP Services (Cayman) Limited
    
    Cayman IslandsWilmington Trust SP Services (Channel Islands) Limited
    
    JerseyWilmington Trust SP Services (Dublin) Limited
    
    IrelandWilmington Trust SP Services (Frankfurt) GmbH
    
    GermanyWT (Luxembourg) SARL
    
    LuxembourgWilmington Trust SP Services (Amsterdam) B. V.
    
    The NetherlandsWilmington Trust SP Services (Luxembourg) S.A.
    
    LuxembourgWilmington Trust CI Holdings Limited
    
    Cayman IslandsWilmington Trust Corporate Services (Cayman)Limited
    
    Cayman IslandsFlorence Limited
    
    Cayman IslandsKendall Corporation Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsSentinel Corporation
    
    Cayman IslandsWoodridge Corporation Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsRedmond Limited
    
    Cayman IslandsRodney Square Insurance Company, Inc.
    
    Delaware
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE 
SHEET OF ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC. AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE 
RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                        
<CIK>               0001011976
<NAME>              ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1996          
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1996          
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-1996          
<CASH>                                          0          
<SECURITIES>                                   40          
<RECEIVABLES>                                   0          
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0          
<INVENTORY>                                     0          
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                0          
<PP&E>                                          0          
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0          
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 40          
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           0          
<BONDS>                                         0          
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0          
<PREFERRED>                                     0          
<COMMON>                                      100          
<OTHER-SE>                                    (60)         
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   40          
<SALES>                                         0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                0          
<CGS>                                           0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0          
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0          
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0          
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 0          
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0          
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0          
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0          
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0          
<CHANGES>                                       0          
<NET-INCOME>                                    0          
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0          
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0          
        


</TABLE>
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




Summary of Pixelworks Non-Employee Director Compensation



Annual compensation will be paid in quarterly increments, and the following rates will apply from
the third quarter of 2008:




Cash compensation:




	 	 	 
	Board Member Retainer

	 	$27,000 per year
	 
	Audit Committee Retainer

	 	$8,000 per year, regular member

$16,000 per year, Chair
	 
	Compensation Committee

	 	$5,000 per year, regular member
	Retainer

	 	$10,000 per year, Chair
	 
	Nominating and Governance

	 	$3,000 per year, regular member
	Committee Retainer

	 	$6,000 per year, Chair






Stock Compensation Plan:



6,000 shares per year (measured from annual meeting to annual meeting), policy to begin with term
in office beginning with the 2009 annual meeting. New non-employee Board members will receive an
initial recruitment grant of 10,000 shares.



Other:



Mr. Alley’s director compensation is determined by the CEO Transition Agreement dated and effective
December 12, 2006, by and between Allen Alley and Pixelworks, Inc. (Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2007).
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned CFO (Chief Financial Officer) of Brandmakers, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for three months ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/___________________
Joy Williams
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

Dated: June 13, 2003

THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATION IS BEING FURNISHED SOLELY PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 AND IS NOT BEING FILED AS PART OF THE REPORT OR AS A SEPARATE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT.
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. R. C. HOILES et al.

No. 2119.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Aug. 5, 1940.

Robert B. Watts, of Washington, D. C-, Acting Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner.

Otto Smith, of Clovis, N. M., for respondent.

Before PHILLIPS and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for enforcement dismissed, on motion of petitioner and pursuant to stipulation.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, William C. Stone, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 of SS&C Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained
in SEC Release 34-47986]

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


     Date: May 6, 2004              By: /s/ William C. Stone

                                    William C. Stone
                                    Chief Executive Officer
Eighth Amendment to the Premcor Inc. Pension Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE 
 PREMCOR PENSION PLAN 
  
 WHEREAS, Premcor Inc.
(“Premcor”) previously adopted the Premcor Pension Plan (“Plan”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, Premcor reserved the right to amend the Plan in Section 12 thereof; and 
  
 WHEREAS, effective January 1, 2005, for paragraphs one and two, Premcor desires to amend the Plan to reflect a change in Plan sponsorship to The Premcor
Refining Group Inc. (“Company”) and effective March 28, 2005, for paragraph three to reduce the limit for certain mandatory distributions; 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows: 
  
 1. Section 1E is deleted and in its place is substituted the following: 
  
 E. “Company” means (i) prior to January 1, 2005, Premcor Inc. and (ii) on and after January 1, 2005, The Premcor
Refining Group Inc. 
  
 2. Section 16G is deleted and in its place
is substituted the following: 
  
 G. Administration of
Plan. 
  
 1. The Company shall be the Plan
Administrator. 
  
 2. The General Counsel of the
Company shall be agent of the Plan for service of legal process. 
  
 3. All references to the amount “$5,000” in Sections 9 and 16D are hereby replaced by the amount “$1,000”. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Premcor and the Company have caused this amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer this 14 day of February, 2005.

  

			
	 PREMCOR INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ James R. Voss


	
	 THE PREMCOR REFINING GROUP INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Dennis R. Eichholz
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00190-CR

Stephanie Murrile, Appellant 

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 8 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CR-10-212556 

HONORABLE CARLOS HUMBERTO BARRERA, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Stephanie Murrile attempted an appeal from a January 7, 2010 trial court 1

order denying her “Motion to Suppress Based on Collateral Estoppel” that sought dismissal of

the charging instrument on double jeopardy grounds. Appellee State of Texas filed a motion to

dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction, arguing that the January 7 order is interlocutory and

not appealable because Murrile has not been convicted or sentenced. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2);

Workman v. State, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961). The State contends that Murrile’s

remedy is by pretrial writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Apolinar, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1991) (prohibiting appellate courts from considering special plea as equivalent of pretrial

Although the order reflects that it was signed on “January 7, 2010,” the year appears to be 1

a typographical error, as the charged offense occurred on July 17, 2010.
writ of habeas corpus); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 27.05 (West 2006) (defining defendant’s

special plea).

With few exceptions, we do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders. Id.

2

We agree that we lack appellate jurisdiction to review a pretrial order denying a motion to suppress.

See Apolinar, 820 S.W.2d at 794 (noting that appellate courts lack jurisdiction to review

interlocutory orders unless expressly provided by law); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161

(Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (concluding that appeal from pretrial order denying motion to

suppress evidence was not immediately appealable and dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction). 

Accordingly, we grant the State’s motion and dismiss Murrile’s appeal for

want of jurisdiction.

 

Jeff Rose, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: August 31, 2011

Do Not Publish

Some interlocutory orders in criminal cases are appealable, for instance: (1) defendants 2

on deferred adjudication may immediately appeal rulings on pretrial motions, (2) defendants may

appeal the denial of a motion to reduce bond, and (3) defendants may appeal from the denial

of a pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus alleging double jeopardy. McKown v. State,

915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.).

2
EDDIE POWELL, JR.,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2640

Opinion filed November 14, 2014.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original 

Jurisdiction.

Eddie Powell, Jr., pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle D. Lylen, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(5).

VAN NORTWICK, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 4076 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2015

- NE

- 30

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into an d then out of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

co st (@$8 5 /h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Removal 0.0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 9 $ 0.00 

### Replacement 0.0 $ 0.00 $8,184 $ 8,184.00 

### 9 $ 73,656.00 

### Install 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 9 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 73,656 

### Costs covered under w arranty ( if known ) $

**On**

**- Condition Costs:** 
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?
YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**
Is the AD signific ant?
YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for
either a Yes or No answer.
YES NO Explanation: 

### This AD is not considered to be "significant"

**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**
This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?
YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
December 4 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF I .R., A MINOR CHILD

NO. 14

- 14

- 00626

- CV

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from a judgment terminating parental rights signed July 21, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision cert ified below for observance. We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2033 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the deduction 

for living expenses incurred by members of Congress. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 31, 2017 

Mrs. ERNST introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate 

the deduction for living expenses incurred by members 

of Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Questionable, Un5 necessary, and Excessive Allowances for Legislators Act’’ 

6 or the ‘‘SQUEAL Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2033 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF DEDUCTION FOR LIVING EX2 PENSES INCURRED BY MEMBERS OF CON3 GRESS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 162 of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended in the mat6 ter following paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘in excess of 

7 $3,000’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

10 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS