T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. WE I QI N S UN , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 08- 10114 D . C . N o. 1: 07 -C R -000 24 -1 ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe D i s tr i c tof

the N orthe rn M a r i a naI s l a nds A l e x R . M uns on, C hi e f D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r12, 2010 ** H o n o lu lu , H a w a ii B efo re: H A W K IN S , M cK E O W N an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. W ei Q i n S un , a C hi nese ci t i ze n, em pl oyed prost i tut es atP ho eni x K ar aoke, S un’ s ba ron the i s l a nd of S a i pa n i n the C om m onw e a l th of the N orthe rn M a r i a na Is l ands (“ C N M I” ). D uri ng a tri p b ac k t o C hi na, S un t ol d X i u L an L i n thatS un had 

# FI LED OC T 14 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

“ op ened a bar i n S ai pan” and n ee ded w ai tre ss es t o w ork there

— and thatw ai tre ss es c o u lde a rn m u c h m o r e in S a ip a n th a n in C h in a . L in th e n p a idS u n ab o u t $ 5 ,2 0 0 in o r d e rto e n te rS a ip a n a n d w o rka t P h o e n ix K a r a o k e . U p o n a rr iv in g in S a ip a n , L in di s c ove r e d tha tS un e xpe c t e d he rt o w ork a s apr os t i tut e a nd r e f us e d t o do s o, e v e n tu a llyc o n ta c tin g th e F B I . S u n wa s c o n v i c t e d o f

v i o l a t i o n s o f

1 8 U. S . C . § § 2 4 2 2 ( a ) , 2 3 1 4 , a n d3 7 1 . On ap p eal , S u n arg u es th atth e d i stri ctco u rtl ack ed j u ri sd i ct i o n t o h ear h er case be c aus e i t s j udge s do note nj oythe pr ot e c t i ons l i s t e d i n A rt i c l e I I I , § 1 of the U ni t ed S t at es C on st i tut i on . C on gres s m aycr ea t e c ou rt s pursuantt o i t s A rt i cl e I V pow e r“ t o di s pos e of

a nd m a ke a l l ne e df

ul Rul e s a nd R e gul a t i ons r e s pe c t i ng the T e rr i t o ryo ro th e rP r o p e rtyb e l o n g i n g t o th e Un i t e dS t a t e s , ” U. S . C o n s t . a rt . I V, § 3 , c l. 2 , a n d in s o d o in g , C o n g r e s s is n o t b o u n db yth e s tr ic tu r e s o f A rtic le I I I . S ee M cA l l i st erv. U ni t ed S t at es , 14 1 U . S . 17 4, 18 6-88 (189 1). S uch A rt i cl e I V c ourt s a r e e m pow e r e d t o he a rc r i m i na l c a s e s . S e e P a l m or e v. U ni t e d S t a t e s , 411 U . S . 38 9, 40 2-03 (197 3). A nd i ti s s ett l ed thatthe D i stri ctC ou rtfor the N orthern M a r i a naI s l a nds i s a n A rt i c l e I V c ourt . N guy e n v. U ni t e d S t a t e s , 539 U . S . 69, 72- 73 (200 3). A cc ordi ng l y, the di stri ctcourthad j uri sdi ct i on t o h ear thi s c as e. S un f urthe rc ont e nds tha tthe e vi de nc e a ttr i a l w a s i ns uf f i c i e ntt o s us t a i n a conv i ct i on on any of the charged offe nses . S un ar gu es thatthere w as no evi dence3

to s h o w th a t s h e “p e r s u a d e [ d ], in d u c e [ d ], e n tic e [ d ], o rc o e r c e [ d ]” L in to tr a v e l to S a ip a n . S e e 1 8 U .S .C . § 2 4 2 2 ( a ) . T h is s ta tu to ryla n g u a g e , h o w e v e r , “m e r e ly r e qui r e s tha t[ S un] ha ve c onvi nc e d ori nf l ue nc e d [ L i n] t o a c tua l l yunde r go the jo u rn e y , o rm a d e th e p o s s ib ilitym o r e ap p e a lin g .” U n ite dS ta te s v . R a s h k o v s k i, 3 0 1 F .3 d 1 1 3 3 , 1 1 3 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) . T h e e v id e n c e a t tr ia l s a tis f ie s th is te s t: in part i cul ar , S un ’ s r epre se nt at i on s abo utthe sa l ar i es of w ai tre ss es i n S ai pan w er e c e n tr a l to L in ’s d e c is io n to m o v e . S un a l s o a r gue s tha tthe r e w a s i ns uf f i c i e nte vi de nc e t o s how tha ts he po ss es se d an “ i nt entt o d ef raud ” L i n. S ee 18 U . S . C . § 2 31 4. B utS un adm i tt ed that s h e d idn o t f

u llye x p la in th e n a tu r e o f th e w o rkto L in w h ile in C h in a . A re as on abl e j ury c ou l d there fore concl ud e thatS un i nt ent i on al l y w i thh el d the nature of he rbus i ne s s f

r om L i n unt i l L i n m ove d t o S a i pa n. S e e J a c ks on v. V i r gi ni a , 443 U . S . 30 7, 31 9 (19 79 ). F in a lly , S u n c la im s th a t h e rc o n s p ir a c yc o n v ic tio n m u s t b e o v e rtu rn e d . B e c au s e L e u n g Mi n Huk e p tS u n ’ s p a y r o l l , h o we v e r , th e j u ryc o u l di n f e rth a tHu kne w the true na tur e of

S un’ s bus i ne s s . M or e ove r , both S un’ s ove r a r c hi ng a gr e e m e ntw i th H u r e ga r di ng i m port e d l abor e r s a nd S un’ s m or e s pe c i f i c a gr e e m e nt t o pa yH u t o l i s tL i n a s aS a i t e e m pl oy e e pr ovi de as uf f i c i e ntba s i s f

r om w hi c h the ju ryc o u ldr e a s o n ab lyin f e rth a t H u k n e w S u n w a s c h a r g in g L in th e f e e to tr a v e l to4

S a i pa n. S e e U ni t e d S t a t e s v. W r i ght , 215 F . 3d 1020, 1028 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( hol di ng tha t“ [ k] now l e dge of

the obj e c t i ve of

the c ons pi r a c y ” c a n be s how n us i ng “c ir c u m s ta n tia l e v id e n c e a n d th e in f e r e n c e s d r a w n f

r o m th a t e v id e n c e ” ) . A FFI R M ED .