alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                  EXHIBIT 21 TO SYMIX SYSTEMS, INC. 1998 FORM 10-K

                             SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

                             SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

               NAME                   JURISDICTION            % OWNERSHIP
 <S>                               <C>                         <C>
   Symix Computer Systems, Inc.           Ohio                    100

   Symix Systems, B.V.               The Netherlands              100

   Symix France, SA                      France                   100



<CAPTION>

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF SYMIX COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.


    Symix Systems (Ontario) Inc.          Canada                  100


    Symix Computer Systems                Canada                  100
    (Canada) Inc.

    Symix Computer Systems (UK)     The United Kingdom            100
    Ltd.

    Symix Computer Systems               Singapore               86.7
    (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.

    Symix Computer Systems                Mexico                  100
    (Mexico) S. De R.L. De C.V.


                                      53
<PAGE>

<CAPTION>

                      SUBSIDIARIES OF SYMIX SYSTEMS, B.V.
 <S>                             <C>                            <C>
  Symix (U.K.) Ltd.                The United Kingdom             100

  Symix Systems GmbH               Germany                        100

  Symix Italia S.r.l.              Italy                          95*

-------------

*Remaining 5% owned by Symix
Systems, Inc.

<CAPTION>

                 SUBSIDIARIES OF SYMIX SYSTEMS (ONTARIO) INC.
                                                                  
  Visual Applications Software,           Canada                  100
  Inc.



<CAPTION>

              SUBSIDIARIES OF SYMIX SYSTEMS (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.



  Symix Asia Company Ltd.                   Thailand                100

  Symix Computer Systems (Hong              Hong Kong               100
  Kong) Ltd.

  Symix Computer Systems                    Australia               100
  (Australia) Pty. Ltd.

  Symix New Zealand Ltd.                   New Zealand              100

  Symix Computer Systems                    Malaysia                100
  (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd.


                                      54

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 75956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31048]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-00-053]


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: International Trade Commission.

Time and Date: December 12, 2000 at 11 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:   
    1. Agenda for future meeting: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-861 (Final) (Certain Expandable Polystyrene 
Resins from Indonesia)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently 
scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to 
the Secretary of Commerce on December 20, 2000.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: November 30, 2000.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-31048 Filed 12-1-00; 2:39 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-M
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATIONS





I, Michel Dagenais, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Radisys Corporation for the fiscal year ended


December 31, 2011; and





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact


necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: April 27, 2012





/s/ Michel A. Dagenais


Michel A. Dagenais


Chief Executive Officer
Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 Amendment to Employment Agreement between 
 Slavie Federal Savings Bank and Charles E. Wagner, Jr. 
  
 In February 2005, the compensation committee of the board of directors increased Mr. Wagner’s annual compensation, effective January 1, 2005, to $80,000 per year. In February 2005, the compensation committee of
the board of directors also determined that Mr. Wagner was entitled to a bonus of $7,700 for service during 2004.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002ION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Geospatial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Thomas R. Oxenreiter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 30, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Thomas R. Oxenreiter
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                    |  | Thomas R. Oxenreiter   
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1778 Prepped by Ollie Stewart

Document

Number: 

# 157 ) ll-E- 8 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 6

Printed 10/28/2008 9:50:59 AM Sheet 157 of 276P. 2 *- > 

## II-E- 8 

# CONVERSATIO N RECOR D | J:oo | "f-ii-2$ TYP E •VISI T•CONFERENC E g j TELEPHON E •INCOMIN G Locatio n o fVisit/Conference : g OUTGOIN G NAM E O F PERSON(S ) CONTACTE D O R I N CONTAC T WIT H YO U ORGANIZATIO N (Office , dept. , bureau , etc. ) . „ TELEPHON E NO* . SUBJEC T/

r

r - a

r>y

r* . ••/ • 

### Mors. XnT o Tor

MFrCO

rS V Ae2T~r

<MI r aTiofi ROUTIN G NAME/SYMBO L IN T i*'«-C»«.Ti.*' C A 

### "FooTfC* Pa / ft l'l 

## ?&W> c f^ctt i)s"JuC~[ I SUMMAR Y 

## £.to/J. Mr. tJ*?./<'ie<L Lot. woulA I'k.-^- the. Tailo«j'i*.a oJ-J.\T,*oma.\ ! *A Tor mat/ ov*\~pn y^*iLJ/f r&O' (D lAi'l /

Wrfco Wa.y^ta ^u.r » A Y^-OKi. CotKi 

# tf-Sr f -h £ _ 

# fr^E, /



## •wa r i a/ i cgjs /

&r ?a r-aoLur- -cy frc*ici Ky 

## 7— r /'• f . ; 0 / '? C C* 

# £ Ks 

## *crr h <T~ ~7-2-? 7 /tTftr j-g 

# I v 

# fe o ^ l y >- ' - M 6 i/ 1 / . i y ,-•-•,

/ > , i c ; /

/" : ( " 

# T 2 /< 3 t-«?£••/£ •>/,,, / / ;/ •ef t a 

### ••r rk c

• / " 'f ' ; 1 I J



### r y y u . tg - / / 5 g<a - <<

" <g. Tr J 

### ' o I 7 / * -g. . f^ o i/ct^ /

ax . <£?-.••. ^ 7 -^ M .•*

. U Ol< Z. <?at err ga. , / •



## idi-c/ &U>.*t *f ) Hd'J£~- ex.-*•/

['tar £. f 

## (°.at*\. cx.ru.i-Z

(2-Utr

btPIA fep/octd CL 

# J - 

# o 

# / f ~ forf " 'Alg-&/iA*ci'h>i-i7 AT •ft 

# aTh £ r VJBrCo TSL.C . 

# h % 

# ti y. 

# H V /g / flow ('.'

a c > . i'i-]0r.ey r'EzS

i? £f.^ * Stf-eniCh ;-Eia / « Tv :~i<O..JC.CL ACTIO N REQUIRE D *^j', 1/ Ca.il

,M £iJa-c./ii-uA-Jv l > • C - X^iiia. ' -'-J- V ' ' <S: I I 

## to'.ii-f^txt- VjsPcC T~t O iclf-e^c*. NAM EO FPERSO NDOCUMENTIN GCONVERSATIO N \E0*y\r*cx- &-r

*-e. is* SIGNATUR E 

### ^cr/^yj-<a- ^ L*Os-

^~* \? > .. . DAT E ACTIO N TAKE N

50271-10 1 *VGP

O : 198 4 O - 461-27 5 (317 ) CONVERSATIO N RECOR D OPTIONA L FOR M 27 1 (12-7 f DEPARTMEN T O F DEFENS E
Schedule 2.1 to the Deferred Compensation and Benefits Trust Agreement



 Exhibit 10.4 
 Schedule 2.1 to the Deferred Compensation and Benefits Trust Agreement 
 Benefit Plans and Other
Arrangements Subject to Trust 
 (1) Sunoco, Inc. Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”); 
 (2) Sunoco, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan; 
 (3) Sunoco, Inc. Pension Restoration Plan; 
 (4) Sunoco, Inc. Savings Restoration Plan. 
 (5) Sunoco, Inc. Special Executive Severance Plan; 
 (6) The funding of the Sunoco, Inc. Special Employee Severance Plan necessary to provide benefits in accordance with the terms of such Plan to only those employees then in grades 11 through 13. 
 (7) The entire funding for all the Indemnification Agreements with the executives set forth below shall be Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) in the
aggregate: 
  

			
	 (a)    Michael J. Colavita
	 	 (l)     Michael S. Kuritzkes

		
	 (b)    John F. Carroll
	 	 (m)   Joel H. Maness 2

		
	 (c)    Terence P. Delaney
	 	 (n)    Michael J. McGoldrick

		
	 (d)    Michael H. R. Dingus 1
	 	 (o)    Ann C. Mulé

		
	 (e)    John G. Drosdick 3
	 	 (p)    Paul A. Mulholland

		
	 (f)     Lynn L. Elsenhans
	 	 (q)    Rolf D. Naku

		
	 (g)    Bruce G. Fischer
	 	 (r)     Marie A. Natoli

		
	 (h)    Michael J. Hennigan
	 	 (s)    Robert W. Owens

		
	 (i)     Thomas W. Hofmann
	 	 (t)     Alan J. Rothman

		
	 (j)     Vincent J. Kelley
	 	 (u)    Michael J. Thomson

		
	 (k)    Joseph P. Krott
	 	 (v)    Charles K. Valutas 4


 NOTES: 

	1.	Mr. Dingus retired as a Senior Vice President of Sunoco, Inc., effective June 1, 2008. 


	2.	Mr. Maness stepped down as an Executive Vice President of Sunoco, Inc., effective July 9, 2007. He continued on a part-time basis as Strategic Advisor on refining and
supply issues reporting directly to the Company’s President, until his retirement from the Company, effective January 1, 2008. 


	3.	Mr. Drosdick retired as Chief Executive Officer and President of Sunoco, Inc., effective August 8, 2008. 


	4.	Mr. Valutas retired as a Senior Vice President of Sunoco, Inc., effective September 1, 2008.
### Docket No. FAA- 2011 - 1060 **Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  1/25/11 **Regional Airline Association Dave L**  **otterer Connie**  **Arnold** 1/25/11

**Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  1/25/11 **ATA Joe White**  1/25/11
Order entered March 4, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00284
- CR LARRY TADUEEN BELLO, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. F
- 1251038
- X



### O RDER Before the Court is the State’s March 2, 3015 second motion for an extension of time to file its brief. The State’s brief was also received by the Court on March 2, 2015. This case is set for submission without oral argum ent on March 31, 2015.

The Court GRANTS the State’s March 2, 3015 second motion for an extension of time to file its brief. The State’s brief is deemed filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                     <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      14,242,977              14,242,977
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  743,508                 743,508
<ALLOWANCES>                                    54,000                  54,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,587,074              15,587,074
<PP&E>                                       5,354,714               5,354,714
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,070,638               2,070,638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,904,771              37,904,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,971,394               2,971,394
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 12,500,000              12,500,000
<COMMON>                                    74,763,353              74,763,353
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,392,569              13,392,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,904,771              37,904,771
<SALES>                                      1,131,209               2,141,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,131,209               2,141,031
<CGS>                                          804,914               1,567,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,472,318              13,100,633
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             172,961                 347,951
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,035,498)            (12,430,019)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0            (12,873,126)
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,035,498)            (25,303,145)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.77)                  (2.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.77)                  (2.85)


</TABLE>
#### JOHNSON v. HUEY & GOULD.

No. 12666.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

April 30, 1932.

Rehearing Denied June 11, 1932.

Fischer & Fischer, of Tyler, for appellant.

P. B. Cox, of Wichita Falls, for appellees.

DUNKLIN, J.

A. L. Huey and Lewis Gould instituted this suit against D. O. Johnson to recover a commission of 21⁄2 per cent, on $21,000 alleged to be due them for procuring the Sherwin-Wil-liams Paint Company as a proposed tenant for a business house located in Wichita Falls and owned by the defendant Johnson.

It was alleged that Johnson employed the plaintiffs as real estate brokers to procure a tenant for the house under a lease contract covering a period of five years at a fixed rental price of $4,200 per year, payable monthly in the sum of $350 and aggregating $21,000 for the full rental period; that plaintiff did procure Sherwin-Williams Paint Company as such a proposed tenant, who was ready and willing to enter into a lease contract upon the terms stated; but that defendant refused to enter into the contract with the tenant so procured. It was further alleged that the defendant, as a part of his contract of employment, agreed to pay plaintiffs a commission of 21⁄2 per cent, on $21,000, the amount to be so realized by him from the tenant, aggregating $525; and that the services rendered by plaintiffs in the procurement of said tenant were reasonably worth that sum.

The case was tried before a jury, who returned findings on special issues sustaining the allegations in plaintiffs’ petition just noted, and upon a verdict so returned judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs against the defendant for the sum of $525, with costs of suit. From that judgment the defendant Johnson has prosecuted this appeal.

The briefs filed by appellant here do not embody any assignments of error whatever. In the trial court the defendant filed a motion for new trial, alleging error in the judgment for several reasons, but none of those grounds have been brought forward as assignments of error in his briefs filed here.

It is-now the settled rule of decisions in this state that in the absence of assignments of error brought forward in appellant’s briefs this court is without authority to pass on anything except fundamental error in the judgment. Natkin Engineering Co. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 37 S.W.(2d) 740.

We have examined the record and find no fundamental error; it appearing that the court had jurisdiction of the cause of action and of the-person of defendant, and that the judgment rendered was based on the verdict of the jury sustaining all the material allegations in plaintiffs’ petition.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 21.1

RADISYS CORPORATION

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                               |  |                               |  | 
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | 
|SUBSIDIARY                                     |  | JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
|Nihon RadiSys K.K.                             |  | Japan                        
|RadiSys Systems Technology (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. |  | China                        
|RadiSys (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.                   |  | Malaysia                     
|RadiSys Canada Inc.                            |  | Canada                       
|RadiSys (UK) Limited                           |  | United Kingdom               
|RadiSys Convedia (Ireland) Limited             |  | Ireland                      
|RadiSys Technology (Ireland) Limited           |  | Ireland                      
|RadiSys Ireland Limited                        |  | Ireland                      
|RadiSys GmbH                                   |  | Germany                      
|RadiSys B.V.                                   |  | Netherlands                  
|RadiSys Israel Ltd.                            |  | Israel
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Cowan, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Delin, J.), rendered August 4, 1989, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and attempted criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of 2 to 4 years’ imprisonment for attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, to run concurrently to a definite term of one-year imprisonment for attempted criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and imposed restitution in the amount of $4,456.99.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

We find that the defendant’s plea was knowing and voluntary and that the allocution was factually sufficient *(see, People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 666). However, the plea minutes do not indicate that the defendant agreed to the payment of $4,456.99 in restitution as a condition of the sentence. Although a court is, of course, free to reserve the right to order restitution with or without the defendant’s consent, the guilty plea in this case was negotiated on terms that did not include mention of restitution. Accordingly, at sentencing, the defendant should have been given an opportunity either to withdraw his plea or to accept the greater sentence of restitution in addition to a prison sentence *(see, People v Lopez,*135 AD2d 739, 739-740). Since he was not afforded this opportunity, we now remit the matter for that purpose. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                   $     569,902
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                             $  9,704,642
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           $10,362,760
<PP&E>                                     $   636,795
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             $11,568,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     $    226,014
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        $1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     $39,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               $11,568,359
<SALES>                                       $749,907
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              $759,961
<CGS>                                         $  5,256
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 $  5,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            $618,953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               $135,752
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  $(53,006)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,147
<SECURITIES>                                     1,525
<RECEIVABLES>                                   90,215
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,645
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,698
<PP&E>                                         116,661
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,850
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 270,889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,441
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                     151,927
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   270,889
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,260
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   93,599
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 534
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,127
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,643
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,454
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,454
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>