alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ben CHANEY v. STATE.

No. 16088.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 31, 1933.

W. E. Martin, of Abilene, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of ten years.

A plea of guilty was entered. The trial was had before the judge in accord with the provisions of the law. No statement of facts or bills of exception are found in the record. No error has been perceived.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Ex parte I. E. YATES.

No. 20715.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 25, 1939.

Grady Sturgeon, of Paris, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The question presented by this record is identical with that presented by the case of Ex parte Gussie Ferguson, Tex.Cr., 132 S.W.2d 408, this day decided by us. For the reasons assigned in that opinion, the relator is ordered discharged.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court vof Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 24-0271 

BRAD RAE RICHARDSON, 

Petitioner and Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Respondent and Appellee. 

ORDER 

FILED 

MAY 2 3 2024 

Bowen Greenwood 

ClerK of Supreme Court 

state of Montana 

This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with the Montana Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellant's opening brief filed on May 22, 

2024, this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the Rules and must 

be resubmitted. The Appellant's opening brief is premature, because under M. R. App. P. 

13(1), an appellant shall file the opening brief within 30 days after the date on which the 

record is filed. Under M. R. App. P. 9, the record is deemed transmitted once the District 

Court record and any necessary transcripts are filed with the Clerk of this Court. Because 

the record has not been transmitted from the District Court, the time for briefing has not 

yet begun. 

Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Appellant's opening brief is rejected; 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the postage costs for returning the referenced 

copies of Appellant's brief will be billed to Appellant by the Clerk of this Court and shall 

be due and payable upon receipt; and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellant's opening brief is due within 30 

days after the date on which the record is filed and the times for any subsequent briefing 

contained in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised opening 

brief. 

The Clerk of this Court is directed to mail a true copy of this Order to Appellant 

and to mail a true copy of this Order to all counsel upon whom the brief was served. 

05/23/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0271
,-, 

DATED this LS' day of May, 2024. 

For the Court, 

By Lo 40 , '4" 3 d

Justice
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40123

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BOBBY JOE PRESSLEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas

(4:93-CR-55)

March 10, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bobby Joe Pressley appeals hissentence on resentencing for possession with

intent to distribute less than five grams of cocaine base within 1000 feet of an

elementary school. This resentencing following the grant of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255
1 United States v. Scott, 672 F.2d 454 (5thCir. 1982);Williamson v. United States, 265

F.2d 236 (5th Cir. 1959).

2 United States v. Merrifield, 764 F.2d 436 (5th Cir. 1985); Fed.R.App.P. 4(b).

2

motion is considered a criminal proceeding.1 Pressley filed his notice of appeal

outside the appeal period for criminal cases. We therefore lack jurisdiction to

address his appeal.2

APPEAL DISMISSED.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.2


                        SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

     I, Randall Jones, Chief Financial Officer of National Quality Care, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  the accompanying Yearly Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
               the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
               with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


                                                   NATIONAL QUALITY CARE, INC.

Dated: April 6, 2005                               By:  /s/ RANDALL JONES
                                                       -----------------------
                                                            RANDALL JONES
                                                       CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to National Quality Care, Inc. and will be retained by
National Quality Care, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Rule 13a-14(a) / Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer**
I, Charles M. Fleischman, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Digene Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal-control over financial reporting.
     Date: May 9, 2005      /s/ Charles M. Fleischman      Name: Charles M. Fleischman
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 155 (Friday, August 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 47840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19425]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9713-7; CERCLA-04-2012-3775]

American Drum and Pallet Company Site; Memphis, Shelby County, 
Tennessee; Notice of settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation 
and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection 
Agency has entered into a settlement for past response costs concerning 
the American Drum and Pallet Company Superfund Site located in Memphis, 
Shelby County, Tennessee.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
September 10, 2012. The Agency will consider all comments received and 
may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments 
received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the 
settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V. 
Painter. Submit your comments by Site name American Drum and Pallet 
Company Site by one of the following methods:
    www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/programs/enforcement/enforcement.html.
     Email. Painter.Paula@epa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at (404) 562-8887.

    Dated: July 13, 2012.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund 
Division, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2012-19425 Filed 8-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1349-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Oklahoma, (FEMA-1349-DR), dated November 27, 2000, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

December 4, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster for the State of Oklahoma is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of November 27, 2000:

Carter, Comanche, and Tillman Counties for Individual Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Lacy E. Suiter, 

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate. 

[FR Doc. 00-31374 Filed 12-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM FORM
     10-K FOR JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE TO
     SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             489,890
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,710,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                       470,290
<INVENTORY>                                     28,511,930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,117,747
<PP&E>                                           8,487,841
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,488,146
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,846,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,726,375
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            45,628
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,649,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,846,058
<SALES>                                        108,140,007
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,140,007
<CGS>                                           89,395,062
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,660,913
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,916,892
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,167,040
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,750,157
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,011,001
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,405,882
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .30
        


</TABLE>
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

BILLY MACK,

Institutional ID No. 2381896

Plaintiff,

v.

FNU FRANK, et al., 

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 

 Civil Action No. 1:22-CV-00099-BU

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order issued this same day, it is the judgment of this Court 

that Plaintiff Billy Mack’s Amended Complaint, and all claims alleged therein, are 

DISMISSED without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to 

comply with a court order and failure to prosecute.

ENTERED this 22nd day of May 2024.

JOHN R. PARKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:22-cv-00099-BU Document 27 Filed 05/22/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 94
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for the Future Flight Data Collection Committee meeting to be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC, 20036.

The agenda will include: (1) Welcome and Introductory Remarks; (2) Review Meeting Agenda; (3) Review Previous Meeting Minutes; (4) Receive report on the deliberations of Working Group 1 (Data Needs); (5) Receive report on the deliberations of Working Group 2 (Technology); (6) Discuss Interim Report; (7) Review First Draft of Final Report Outline; (8) Presentations; (9) Other Business; (10) Establish Agenda for Next Meeting; (11) Date and Location of Next Meeting; (12) Closing.

Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements, obtain information or pre-register for the committee should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC, 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax). Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

Issued in Washington, DC, on November 22, 2000.

Janice L. Peters,

Designated Official.

[FR Doc. 00-30775  Filed 12-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 10.2



                                   May 5, 2005

The Board of Directors
Data Systems & Software Inc.
200 Route 17
Mahwah, New Jersey 07430

                  Re:      Employment Agreement and Consulting Arrangement

Dear Members of the Board:

         Reference is made to that certain Employment Agreement (the "Employment
Agreement") dated as of January 1, 1997, as amended as of May 17, 2001, as
further amended as of March 13, 2002 and December 30, 2004, by and between the
undersigned and Data Systems & Software Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company").

         I hereby agree and acknowledge that for the period beginning on the
date hereof and ending on May 31, 2006 I will not seek to enforce Section
2(a)(2)(iii) of the Employment Agreement, which requires the Company to fund the
payment of all consulting fees to become payable to me throughout the entire
Consulting Period (as such term is defined in the Employment Agreement), and
will accept payments in respect thereof in accordance with the Company's usual
and customary payroll practices for executive officers, provided that, if any
one of the following events occur:

      (1)   the Company receives net proceeds of at least $1.5 million from an
            equity or long-term debt transaction or sale of assets;
      (2)   I die or become disabled; or
      (3)   I am terminated as Chief Executive Officer of the Company for any
            reason other than my voluntary resignation,

then, unless otherwise agreed to by me in writing, the Company shall be required
to comply with Section 2(a)(2)(iii) of the Employment Agreement and forthwith
make payment in full to me (or my estate, as the case may be) in accordance with
such provision.



<PAGE>

         This letter supersedes any and all prior agreements and understandings,
written or oral, with respect to the subject matter hereof.

         If the foregoing accurately sets forth our agreement with respect to
the foregoing, please execute a copy of this letter and return the same to the
undersigned.

                               Very truly yours,

                               /s/ George Morgenstern
                               George Morgenstern


AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED:


By:/s/ Yacov Kaufman
   ---------------------------
       Yacov Kaufman
       Chief Financial Officer

                                      -2-
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6685
PEDRO GARCIA QUINTERO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RANDALL E. LEE, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-96-984-5-H) Submitted: October 10, 1997 Decided: October 24, 1997 Before HALL, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pedro Garcia Quintero, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* We note that in adopting the magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation in total, the petition was dismissed without prejudice. 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals a district court order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. * Quintero v. Lee , No. CA-96-984-5-H (E.D.N.C. May 1, 1997). We also deny Appellant's motion for a certificate of probable cause. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41031 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SANTOS BENITES-PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-340-1

-------------------- August 20, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Santos Benites-Fineda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Benites-Fineda has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,No. 01-41031 -2- counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.