### 60809 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 13, 2004 / Rules and Regulations
paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this AD, except as provided by paragraph (f) of this AD.

(1) Deactivate the Lucas humidifier, part number (P/N) M01AA0101, M01AB0101, M01AB0102, or M01AB0103, in accordance with the service bulletin.

(2) Before further flight following the deactivation specified in paragraph (e)(1) of this AD, replace all APU and engine fire shutoff switches with new or serviceable switches in accordance with the service bulletin. Reactivation of Lucas Humidifier

(f) For any airplanes on which Lucas humidifier, P/N M01AA0101, M01AB0101, M01AB0102, or M01AB0103 is reactivated after the effective date of this AD: Do the requirements of paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this AD at the times specified in those paragraphs.

(1) Within 18 months after reactivating the humidifier, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 18 months, do the functional test required by paragraph (b) of this AD.

(2) Within 36 months after reactivating the humidifier, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 36 months, replace all APU and engine fire shutoff switches that have not been previously replaced per paragraph (c) of this AD. Do the replacements per paragraph (d) of this AD. Actions Accomplished Per Previous Issue of Service Bulletin

(g) Unless otherwise specified in this AD, actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD per Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747

– 26A2274, dated August 29, 2002, are considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding action specified in this AD. Alternative Methods of Compliance

(h) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, is authorized to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD. Incorporation by Reference

(i) The actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747

– 26A2274, Revision 1, dated January 9, 2003. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124

– 2207. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741

– 6030, or go to: http:// www.archives.gov/federal

_register/ code

_ of

_ federal

_regulations/ ibr

_locations.html. Effective Date

(j) This amendment becomes effective on November 17, 2004. Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 30, 2004. Kevin M. Mullin, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 04

– 22563 Filed 10

– 12

– 04; 8:45 am]
**BILLING CODE 4910**

**– 13** 

**– P** 

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**
**Federal Aviation Administration**
**14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. 2002** 

**– NM** 

**– 211** 

**– AD; Amendment**  **39**

**– 13819; AD 2004** 

**– 20** 

**– 14]**  **RIN 2120**

**– AA64**  **Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B4 Series Airplanes and Model**  **A300 B4**

**– 600, A300 B4** 

**– 600R, and A300**  **F4**

**– 600R (Collectively Called A300** 

**– 600) Series Airplanes** 
**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. **ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all Airbus Model A300 B4 series airplanes and all Airbus Model A300

– 600 series airplanes. That AD currently requires a one-time high frequency eddy current inspection to detect cracking of the splice fitting at fuselage frame (FR) 47 between stringers 24 and 25; and corrective actions if necessary. This amendment requires new repetitive inspections of an expanded area and adds airplanes to the applicability in the existing AD. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct cracking of the splice fitting at fuselage FR 47, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition. **DATES :**  Effective November 17, 2004.

The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of November 17, 2004. **ADDRESSES :**  The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741

– 6030, or go to: http:// www.archives.gov/federal

_register/ code

_ of

_ federal

_regulations/ ibr

_locations.html. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Tim Backman, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM

– 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055

–4056; telephone (425) 227

– 2797; fax (425) 227

– 1149. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 2001

– 03

– 14, amendment 39

– 12118 (66 FR 10957, February 21, 2001), was published as a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register on August 4, 2004 (69 FR 47035). The proposal is applicable to all Airbus Model A300 series airplanes and all Airbus Model A300

– 600 series airplanes. The action proposed to require new repetitive high frequency eddy current inspections to detect cracking of an expanded area, and corrective actions, if necessary; and to add airplanes to the applicability in the existing AD. Comments

Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response to the proposal or the FAA ’ s determination of the cost to the public. Clarification of Service Information Requirements for Paragraph (b) of This AD

In our response to comments in the Preamble of the supplemental NPRM, we stated our intent to revise paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of the supplemental NPRM to refer to Revision 02 of the referenced Airbus service bulletins as the appropriate sources of service information for accomplishment of the required actions. (Revision 01 of those service bulletins was referenced in the original NPRM for accomplishment of the required actions.) However, while we revised paragraphs (a) and (c) of the supplemental NPRM, we inadvertently omitted the revision to paragraph (b). Therefore, we have revised paragraph (b) of this final rule to reference Revision 02 of Airbus Service Bulletin A300

– 53

– 6123 as the appropriate source of service information for the required actions in that paragraph. Conclusion

After careful review of the available data, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule with the change


### 60810 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 13, 2004 / Rules and Regulations
described previously. The FAA has determined that this change will neither increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD. Cost Impact

There are approximately 92 airplanes of U.S. registry that will be affected by this AD.

The inspection of an expanded area that is required in this AD will take approximately 29 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the required inspection on U.S. operators is estimated to be $173,420, or $1,885 per airplane, per inspection cycle.

The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other administrative actions. Regulatory Impact

The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this final rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) Is not a

‘‘ significant regulatory action ’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘ significant rule ’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption **ADDRESSES**

. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment

■ Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
**PART 39**

**— AIRWORTHINESS**  **DIRECTIVES**

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. **§ 39.13 [Amended]** 
■ 2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39

– 12118 (66 FR 10957, February 21, 2001), and by adding a new airworthiness directive (AD), amendment 39

– 13819, to read as follows:
2004

– 20

– 14 Airbus: Amendment 39

– 13819. Docket 2002

–NM

– 211

–AD. Supersedes AD 2001

– 03

– 14, Amendment 39

– 12118. Applicability: All Model A300 B4

– 600, B4

– 600R, and F4

– 600R (collectively called A300

– 600) series airplanes; and all Model A300 B4 series airplanes; certificated in any category.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

To detect and correct cracking of the splice fitting at fuselage frame (FR) 47, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane, accomplish the following: Repetitive Inspections

(a) For airplanes defined in Airbus Service Bulletin A300

– 53

– 0350, Revision 02, dated November 12, 2002: Do a high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection to detect cracking of the splice fitting at fuselage FR 47 between stringers 24 and 26 (left- and right-hand sides), at the applicable times specified in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this AD. Repeat the inspection thereafter at the earlier of the flight-cycle/flight-hour intervals specified in the applicable column in Table 2 of Figure 1 and Sheet 1 of the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin. Do the inspections in accordance with the service bulletin, excluding Appendix 01.

(1) For airplanes that have accumulated 20,000 or more total flight cycles as of the effective date of this AD: Do the initial inspection at the later of the times specified in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii) of this AD:

(i) At the earlier of the flight-cycle/flighthour intervals after the effective date of this AD, as specified in the applicable column in Table 1 of Figure 1 and Sheet 1 of the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin.

(ii) Within 750 flight cycles or 1,500 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, whichever is first.

(2) For airplanes that have accumulated fewer than 20,000 total flight cycles as of the effective date of this AD: Do the initial inspection at the later of the times specified in paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii) of this AD. (i) At the earlier of the flight-cycle/flighthour intervals after the effective date of this AD, as specified in the applicable column in Table 1 of Figure 1 and Sheet 1 of the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin.

(ii) Within 1,800 flight cycles or 3,000 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, whichever is first.

(b) For airplanes defined in Airbus Service Bulletin A300

– 53

– 6123, Revision 02, dated November 12, 2002: Do the HFEC inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD at the applicable times specified in paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this AD. Repeat the inspection thereafter at the earlier of the flight-cycle/ flight-hour intervals specified in the applicable column in Table 2 of Figure 1 and Sheet 1 of the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin. Do the inspections in accordance with the service bulletin, excluding Appendix 01.

(1) For airplanes that have accumulated 10,000 or more total flight cycles as of the effective date of this AD: Do the initial inspection within 750 flight cycles or 1,900 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, whichever is first.

(2) For airplanes that have accumulated fewer than 10,000 total flight cycles as of the effective date of this AD: Do the initial inspection at the later of the times specified in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this AD.

(i) At the earlier of the flight-cycle/flighthour intervals after the effective date of this AD, as specified in the applicable column in Table 1 of Figure 1 and Sheet 1 of the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin.

(ii) Within 1,500 flight cycles or 3,800 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, whichever is first. Repair

(c) Repair any cracking found during any inspection required by this AD before further flight, in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300

– 53

– 0350 or A300

– 53

– 6123, both Revision 02, both excluding Appendix 01, both dated November 12, 2002; as applicable. Where the service bulletins specify to contact Airbus in case of certain crack findings, this AD requires that a repair be accomplished before further flight in accordance with a method approved by either the Manager, International Branch, ANM

– 116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate; or the Direction Ge  ́ ne

 ́ rale de l ’ Aviation Civile (DGAC) (or its delegated agent). Credit for Previous Issues of Airbus Service Bulletin

(d) Accomplishment of the actions before the effective date of this AD in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300

– 53

– 0350 or A300

– 53

– 6123, Revision 01, dated December 18, 2001; is considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions specified in this AD. Alternative Methods of Compliance

(e) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the Manager, International Branch, ANM

– 116, is authorized to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD.


### 60811 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 13, 2004 / Rules and Regulations
Incorporation by Reference

(f) Unless otherwise specified in this AD, the actions shall be done in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300

– 53

– 0350, Revision 02, excluding Appendix 01, dated November 12, 2002; and Airbus Service Bulletin A300

– 53

– 6123, Revision 02, excluding Appendix 01, dated November 12, 2002; as applicable. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741

– 6030, or go to: http:// www.archives.gov/federal

_register/ code

_ of

_ federal

_regulations/ ibr

_locations.html. Note 1: The subject of this AD is addressed in French airworthiness directive 2002

– 184(B), dated April 3, 2002. Effective Date

(g) This amendment becomes effective on November 17, 2004.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 30, 2004. Kevin M. Mullin, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 04

– 22564 Filed 10

– 12

– 04; 8:45 am]
**BILLING CODE 4910**

**– 13** 

**– P** 

**DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES**  **Food and Drug Administration**
**21 CFR Part 510 New Animal Drugs; Change of**  **Sponsors ’**  **Addresses**
**AGENCY :**  Food and Drug Administration, HHS. **ACTION :**  Final rule.
**SUMMARY :**  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal drug regulations to reflect changes of address for Alpharma Inc.; Intervet Inc.; and Ve ` toquinol N.-A., Inc. **DATES :**  This rule is effective October 13, 2004. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  David R. Newkirk, Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV

– 100), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 301

– 827

– 6967; email: david.newkirk@fda.gov

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Alpharma Inc., One Executive Dr., P.O. Box 1399, Fort Lee, NJ 07024, has informed FDA of a change of address to One Executive Dr., Fort Lee, NJ 07024. Intervet, Inc., P.O. Box 318, 405 State St., Millsboro, DE 19966, has informed FDA of a change of address to 29160 Intervet Lane, P.O. Box 318, Millsboro, DE 19966. Ve ` toquinol N.-A., Inc., 2000 chemin Georges, Lavaltrie (PQ), Canada J0K 1H0, has informed FDA of a change of address to 2000 chemin Georges, Lavaltrie (PQ), Canada J5T 3S5. Accordingly, the agency is amending the regulations in 21 CFR 510.600 to reflect these changes of sponsors ’ addresses.

This rule does not meet the definition of ‘‘ rule ’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A), because it is a rule of ‘‘ particular applicability. ’’ Therefore, it is not subject to congressional review requirements in 5 U.S.C. 801

– 808. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 510

Administrative practice and procedure, Animal drugs, Labeling, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
■ Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 510 is amended as follows:
**PART 510**

**— NEW ANIMAL DRUGS** 

■ 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 510 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 353, 360b, 371, 379e. **§ 510.600 [Amended]** 
■ 2. Section 510.600 is amended:

a. In the table in paragraph (c)(1) in the entry for ‘‘ Alpharma Inc. ’’ , by removing ‘‘ P.O. Box 1399, ’’ ;

b. In the table in paragraph (c)(1) in the entry for ‘‘ Intervet, Inc. ’’ , by removing ‘‘ Intervet, Inc., P.O. Box 318, 405 State St. ’’ and by adding in its place

‘‘ Intervet Inc., P.O. Box 318, 29160 Intervet Lane ’’ ;

c. In the table in paragraph (c)(1) in the entry for ‘‘ Ve ` toquinol N.-A., Inc. ’’ , by removing ‘‘ J0K 1H0 ’’ and by adding in its place ‘‘ J5T 3S5 ’’ ;

d. In the table in paragraph (c)(2) in the entry for ‘‘ 046573 ’’ , by removing

‘‘ P.O. Box 1399 ’’ ;

e. In the table in paragraph (c)(2) in the entry for ‘‘ 057926 ’’ by removing

‘‘ Intervet, Inc., P.O. Box 318, 405 State St. ’’ and by adding in its place ‘‘ Intervet Inc., P.O. Box 318, 29160 Intervet Lane ’’ ; and

f. In the table in paragraph (c)(2) in the entry for ‘‘ 059320 ’’ , by removing

‘‘ J0K 1H0 ’’ and by adding in its place

‘‘ J5T 3S5 ’’

. Dated: September 16, 2004. Bernadette A. Dunham, Deputy Director, Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine. [FR Doc. 04

– 22915 Filed 10

– 12

– 04; 8:45 am]
**BILLING CODE 4160**

**– 01** 

**– S** 

**DEPARTMENT OF STATE 22 CFR Part 51**  **RIN 1400**

**– ZA07**  **[Public Notice 4859] Passport Procedures** 

**— Amendment to**  **Passport Regulations**
**AGENCY :**  State Department. **ACTION :**  Interim rule.
**SUMMARY :**  This interim rule amends the regulation implementing the statutory requirement that both parents consent to issuance of a passport for children under 14 years to require that a statement of consent submitted in support of a minor ’ s application be notarized. The rule will ensure that the individual providing the signature is properly identified. **DATES :**  The effective date is November 1. The Department will accept comments from the public up to 30 days from November 12, 2004. **ADDRESSES :**  Written comments should be addressed to: Chief, Legal Division, Office of Passport Policy, Planning and Advisory Services, 2100 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20037. E-mail for comments: PassportRules@state.gov.

Persons with access to the internet may also view this notice and provide comment by going to the regulations.gov Web site at: http://www.regulations.gov/ index.cfm. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Sharon Palmer-Royston, Office of Passport Policy, Planning and Advisory Services, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Department of State 202

– 663

– 2662; Fax 202

– 663

– 2654. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  22 U.S.C. 213 provides that before a U.S. passport can be issued the applicant ‘‘ shall subscribe to and submit a written application which shall contain a true recital of each and every matter of fact which may be required by law or by any rules authorized by law. ’’ Section 236 of the Admiral James W. Nance and Meg Donovan Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Public Law 106

– 113, 113 Stat. 1501A

–420 (22 U.S.C. 213n) ( ‘‘ 2-Parent Consent Statute ’’ ) provides that the Secretary shall require documentary proof of both parents ’ or