alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                |        |                               |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| Subsidiary                                     |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
| Nihon RadiSys K.K.                             |   | Japan                         |
| RadiSys Systems Technology (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. |   | China                         |
| RadiSys (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.                   |   | Malaysia                      |
| RadiSys Canada ULC                             |   | Canada                        |
| RadiSys UK Limited                             |   | United Kingdom                |
| RadiSys Convedia (Ireland) Limited             |   | Ireland                       |
| RadiSys Technology (Ireland) Limited           |   | Ireland                       |
| RadiSys Ireland Limited                        |   | Ireland                       |
| RadiSys GmbH                                   |   | Germany                       |
| RadiSys B.V.                                   |   | Netherlands                   |
| RadiSys Israel Ltd.                            |   | Israel                        |
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-3123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--VSI Alliance

    Notice is hereby given that, on April 20, 1999, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), VSI Alliance has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Prakash Bare 
(individual membership), San Jose, CA; EnThink, Inc., Santa Clara, CA; 
Hantro Products Oy, Oulu, FINLAND; Korea Electronic Technology 
Institute, Pyung Taek-Si, Kyung Gi-Do, SOUTH KOREA; Massana, Inc., 
Campbell, CA; TAEUS, Colorado Springs, CO; The Silicon Group, Inc., 
Austin, TX; and Worldwide Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp., Hsinchu, 
TAIWAN have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Ambit Design 
Systems, Inc., Austin, TX; Beijing Intelligent Electronics Co., Ltd., 
Beijing, PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA; CAE Plus, Inc., Austin, TX; Cygnus 
Solutions, Sunnyvale, CA; Duet Technologies, Inc., San Jose, CA; 
Exemplar Logic, Inc., Fremont, CA; FFC Limited (Fuji Facom Control), 
Tokyo, JAPAN; Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Labs, Camden, NJ; LTX 
Corp., Westwood, MA; Neuw Intellectual Property, Oldham, Lancs., UNITED 
KINGDOM; SIS Microelectronics, Inc., Longmont, CO; Spinnaker Systems, 
Inc., Tokyo, JAPAN; Vantis, Sunnyvale, CA; Wipro Ltd., Santa Clara, CA; 
and Yokogawa Electric Corp., Tokyo, JAPAN have been dropped as parties 
to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and VSI Alliance intends to file 
additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 29, 1996, VSI Alliance filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on March 4, 1997 (62 FR 9812).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 11, 
1999. A notice has not yet been published in the Federal Register.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-3123 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP96-367-013]

Take notice that on November 21, 2000, Northwest Pipeline Corporation (Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to become effective December 1, 2000:

Substitute Tenth Revised Sheet No. 8.1

Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to correct the Rate Schedule LS-2I rates filed on October 30, 2000 in Docket No. RP96-367-012.

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-30728  Filed 12-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Euroopa Liidu C 39A/7. v

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 39A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 60. Aastakäik7. veebruar 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 39A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

60. Aastakäik7. veebruar 2017

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Teated |
| | HALDUSMENETLUSED |
| | Euroopa Komisjon |
| 2017/C 39 A/01 | Ühenduse Sordiamet — Osalemiskutse Ühenduse Sordiameti apellatsiooninõukogu esimehe leidmiseks (COM/2017/20018) | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

V   Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Euroopa Komisjon

2017/C 39 A/01

Ühenduse Sordiamet — Osalemiskutse Ühenduse Sordiameti apellatsiooninõukogu esimehe leidmiseks (COM/2017/20018)

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

V Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Euroopa Komisjon

| 7.2.2017 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 39/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2017

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 39/1

---

ÜHENDUSE SORDIAMET

Osalemiskutse Ühenduse Sordiameti apellatsiooninõukogu esimehe leidmiseks

(COM/2017/20018)

(2017/C 039 A/01)

Ühenduse Sordiamet soovib ametisse nimetada oma apellatsiooninõukogu esimehe.

Kandidaat peab olema Euroopa Liidu liikmesriigi kodanik.

Nõukogu nimetab esimehe ametisse kandidaatide nimekirjast, mille komisjoni esitab pärast ameti haldusnõukogu arvamuse saamist. Teavet töötasu kohta võib saada apellatsiooninõukogu sekretariaadilt (Community Plant Variety Office, 3 boulevard Maréchal-Foch, BP 10121, 49101 Angers Cedex 02). Ühenduse Sordiametis ja komisjonis kehtib võrdsete võimaluste poliitika.

Osalemiskutse täistekst ning elektroonilise taotlusvormi link on kättesaadavad järgmisel aadressil: https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/human-resources/seniormanagementvacancies/

Avalduste esitamise tähtaeg on 8. märts 2017 (vt üksikasju avalduste saatmise juhistest).

---
II 

Calendar No. 139 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1271 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 6, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JULY 30, 2009 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2351 West Atlantic Boulevard in Pompano 

Beach, Florida, as the ‘‘Elijah Pat Larkins Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIJAH PAT LARKINS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 2351 West Atlantic Boulevard 

6 in Pompano Beach, Florida, shall be known and des7 ignated as the ‘‘Elijah Pat Larkins Post Office Building’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1271 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Elijah Pat Larkins 

5 Post Office Building’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS

wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 139 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1271 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPat Larkins Post Office Building’’. vard in Pompano Beach, Florida, as the ‘‘Elijah al Service located at 2351 West Atlantic BouleJULY 30, 2009 

Reported without amendment 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.47


                      MODIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This Modification of Employment Agreement made as of this 9th day of
March, 2005, by and between Valley National Gases, Inc. ("Company"), a West
Virginia corporation and Gerald W. Zehala ("Employee").

         WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, Employee is deemed by Company to be a valuable executive
officer serving the Company; and

         WHEREAS, Company wishes to retain Employee as an executive officer of
the Company; and

         WHEREAS, the Company does not have any retention agreements or policies
presently in place that would affect this Employee; and

         WHEREAS, the Company and Employee have previously entered an Employment
Agreement ("Employment Agreement") which is dated the 1st day of June, 2004; and

         WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Employment Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises contained herein and
in that certain Employment Agreement between the parties, it is agreed as
follows:

         1.) Section 2. of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read as
follows:

                  Term. The Employee's employment by the Company and the initial
         term of this Agreement ("Initial Term") shall commence as of the date
         hereof and shall continue in full force and effect, unless earlier
         terminated as provided hereinafter in Section 6., until the third (3rd)
         anniversary thereof. At the conclusion of the Initial Term, Employee's
         employment with the Company may, at the Company's election, continue
         thereafter, until terminated as provided hereinafter in Section 6., on
         the terms and conditions as set forth in this Agreement. The Initial
         Term and all time of employment thereafter shall collectively be
         referred to as the "Employment Term".

         2.) Other than the amendment to the term of the Employment Agreement
above set out, there are no additional modifications to the Employment Agreement
which continues in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Modification of
Employment Agreement to be executed by authority of its Board of Directors, and
the Employee has hereunto set his hand, as of the day and year first written
above.


<PAGE>


                                           Valley National Gases, Inc.
WITNESS:


/s/  James P. Hart                     By:  /s/  W.A. Indelicato
------------------------------              ------------------------------------
                                            William A. Indelicato
                                      Its:  Chief Executive Officer


WITNESS:

/s/  James P. Hart                          /s/  Gerald W. Zehala
------------------------------              -----------------------------------
                                            Gerald W. Zehala
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law

of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation

of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the

terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 2/9/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

OTTO GRAHAM, 

Petitioner - Appellant, No. 95-1384

v. (D.C. No. 95-M-1037)

ROBERT FURLONG; ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

COLORADO, 

(D. Colo.)

Respondents - Appellees.

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, McKAY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging the length of petitioner’s
2

state court sentence. The district court order dismissing the petition is affirmed for the

reasons contained in the magistrate judge’s recommendation and the trial court’s order

adopting the recommendation.

AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40023 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROGELIO VEGA-CHAVEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:07-CR-632-1 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent RogelioVega-Chavez has moved for leave towithdrawand has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Vega-Chavez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 22, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 456

_____________________________ C ARLTON L ORENZO W ILLIAMS S R , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. James M. Colaw , Judge

. August 2, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , O STERHAUS , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore and Damaris E. Reynolds, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Sandesh Mahatme, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., (the “Registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

| April 29, 2016 |   | /s/ Sandesh Mahatme                            |
|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|                |   | Sandesh Mahatme                                |
|                |   | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
|                |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)   |
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Drinks Americas Holdings, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Fabio Berkowicz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:


      1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Fabio Berkowicz                                     April 17, 2007
-----------------------
Fabio Berkowicz,
Chief Financial Officer
Respect

ath Stepp, Sec tary isconsin Department of atural Resources cc: Scott Walker, Governor, State of Wisconsin State of Wisconsin DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 101 S. Webster Street Box 7921 Madison WI 53707-7921 Scott Walker, Governor Cathy Stepp, Secretary Telephone 608-266-2621 Toll Free 1-888-936-7463 TTY Access via relay - 711 February 29, 2012

Susan Hedman U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) - Region 5 77 West Jackson Boulevard Mail Code: R-19J Chicago IL 60604

Subject: Re: Wisconsin's 120-Day Letter for Ozone Designations Dear Regional Administrator Hedman: Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the U.S. EPA's recently proposed air quality designations for the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). These comments are in response to your letter dated December 9, 2011 to Governor Scott Walker. We anticipate providing additional comments in regard to Kenosha County in response to your letter dated January 31, 2012 within the required 120-day time period. First, we agree with the "unclassifiable / attainment" designation for seventy of Wisconsin's seventy-two counties. Significant progress has been made in reducing ozone concentrations throughout Wisconsin and this designation acknowledges that achievement. Average statewide ozone design values have decreased from 77 parts per billion (ppb) to 66 ppb just over the last five years. Recognizing our improving air quality is important given the associated public health benefits and economic burdens associated with nonattainment designations. Second, in regards to Sheboygan County, we recognize that the U.S. EPA proposed a "nonattainment" designation given their recorded design value of 78 ppb from 2008 — 2010. We appreciate that the U.S. EPA recognized in their technical support document that Sheboygan County and the adjacent counties all have "relatively low emissions" and furthermore, that "the low emission levels in the area indicate that longer range transport is the significant contributor to violations in the Sheboygan, WI area." Given the acknowledged low emissions in the area, imposing nonattainment status, along with its corresponding negative impacts on business and economic development, highlights a fundamental flaw in the regulatory structure contained in the Clean Air Act. Finally, we ask the U.S. EPA to finalize all necessary ozone implementation guidance as soon as practicable. In addition, in accordance with the proposed implementation guidance, we request Sheboygan County be designated as a marginal nonattainment area since it only exceeded the standard by 3 ppb. Thank you for consideration of these comments. If you have any questions please feel free to contact Bart Sponseller, Air Management Bureau Director, at (608) 264 — 8537 or 

### Bart.Sponseller@wisconsin.gov .

d nr.wi.gov wisconsin.gov 

## Naturally 

## WISCONSIN PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPERPage 2
Matt Moroney, Deputy Secretary, WDNR – AD / 8 Patrick Stevens, Air and Waste Division Administrator, WDNR – AD / 8 Bart Sponseller, Air Management Bureau Director, WDNR – AM / 7 Joseph Hoch, Regional Pollutant and Mobile Source Section Chief – AM / 7
#### WESTMORELAND ASBESTOS COMPANY, Inc., Home Insulation Company, Inc., Westchester Asbestos Corporation, Rock Wool Insulation Corporation, Plaintiffs, W. G. Kuehn, Inc., and William G. Kuehn, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, John *A.*Roebling’s Sons Company of New York, Stellar Corporation, and Hiram E. Manville, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 391.

Circuit- Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 8, 1940.

Weissberger & Leichter, of New York City (M. M. Leichter and John L. Ketch-am, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardiner & Reed, of New York City (Theodore Kiendl, A. S. Edmonds, and Francis W. Phillips, all of New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.

Before SWAN, CLARK and PATTERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on opinion below, 30 F.Supp. 389, in which decision was adhered to on reargument in 32 F.Supp. 731, without appellate costs.