alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 76224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31000]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the Board of Visitors to the U.S. Naval Academy

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Naval Academy Board of Visitors will meet to make 
such inquiry as the Board shall deem necessary into the state of morale 
and discipline, the curriculum, instruction, physical equipment, fiscal 
affairs, and academic methods of the Naval Academy. During this meeting 
inquiries will relate to the internal personnel rules and practices of 
the Academy, may involve on-going criminal investigations, and include 
discussions of personal information the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. The 
executive session of this meeting will be closed to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, December 11, 2000, from 8:30 
a.m. to 11:45 a.m. The closed Executive Session will be from 10:50 a.m. 
to 11:45 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the Bo Coppedge Dining Room of 
Alumni Hall at the U.S. Naval Academy.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander Thomas E. Osborn, 
Executive Secretary to the Board of Visitors, Office of the 
Superintendent, U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000, telephone 
number: (410) 293-1503.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of meeting is provided per the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2). The executive session 
of the meeting will consist of discussions of information which pertain 
to the conduct of various midshipmen at the Naval Academy and internal 
Board of Visitors matters. Discussion of such information cannot be 
adequately segregated from other topics, which precludes opening the 
executive session of this meeting to the public. In accordance with 5 
U.S.C. App. 2, section 10(d), the Secretary of the Navy has determined 
in writing that the special committee meeting shall be partially closed 
to the public because they will be concerned with matters as outlined 
in section 552(b)(2), (5), (6), and (7) of title 5, U.S.C. Due to 
unavoidable delay in administrative processing, the normal 15 days 
notice could not be provided.

    Dated: November 29, 2000.
James L. Roth,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-31000 Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
#### KREITER v. KREITER.

No. 10932.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Galveston.

Feb. 21, 1940.

*185Heidingsfelder & Wander and H. G. Hart, all of Houston, for appellant.

T. B.' Blanchard, of Houston, for appel-lee.

MONTEITH, Chief Justice.

Appellant, B. O. Kreiter, sued appellee, Ruth Kreiter, for divorce, alleging cruel treatment, personal violence, and abusive epithets on the part of appellee. Appellee contested the suit. Upon trial before the court without a jury, judgment was rendered denying the divorce. From this judgment appellant has appealed, setting up as his sole ground for reversal that the trial court erred in holding that the evidence failed to support the allegations of the petition.

The appellant testified to numerous acts of cruelty on the part of appellee. Appel-lee either positively denied these charges or reasonably explained them. There is also evidence in the record tending to prove that the acts complained of by appellant were induced by the physical and mental condition of appellee, over which she had no control.

It is uniformly held in this state that, under Article 4632 of the Revised Statutes of 1925, a trial *court is*authorized to render judgment granting a divorce only upon full and satisfactory evidence sustaining the allegations of the petition. It is further held that in a divorce case the court is clothed with more discretionary power in determining the sufficiency or insufficiency of the evidence to warrant a decree than perhaps in any other form of action, and that an appellate court may not revise that discretion in the absence of a showing of a clear abuse thereof on the part of the trial court. Lloyd v. Lloyd, Tex.Civ.App., 107 S.W.2d 1047; Scannell v. Scannell, Tex.Civ.App., 117 S. W.2d 538; Blackmon v. Blackmon, Tex. Civ.App., 11 S.W.2d 533.

 In the instant case the judgment of the trial court, which was rendered on sufficient evidence after a full hearing on the facts, must be construed as an affirmative finding that there was not such "full and satisfactory” evidence in the record as would authorize the granting of the divorce sought by appellant. Under the above authorities this court is not authorized, under this record, to disturb the findings and judgment of the trial court.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.
Order issued September 19, 2012 

In The 

Tourt of Apprats 

IMO Bistritt of - rxas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01134-CV 

IN RE TROY LEE PERKINS, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 282nd Criminal District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. F07-00645-S 

ORDER 

Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Fillmore 

The Court has before it relator's September 4, 2012 letter to this Court, which we construe 

as a motion for rehearing. This Court has no jurisdiction over habeas corpus proceedings in which 

the relator seeks relief from a felony judgment after final conviction. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. 

ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2011). Accordingly, we DENY the motion for rehearing. 

ROBERT M. FILLMORE 

JUSTICE
#### EDWARDS v. STATE.

No. 20506.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 25, 1939.

Joseph A Seymour, of Midland, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court. .
EXHIBIT 31.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trimol Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.   /s/ YuriBenensonYuri BenensonChief Executive OfficerTRIMOL GROUP, INC.  May 22, 2006    18
<PAGE>

                                                           EXHIBIT 23.2

The Board of Directors
Ross Systems Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements 
(File Nos. 33-42036, 33-48226, 33-56584, 33-72168, 33-89128, 333-36745 and 
333-44665) on Form S-8 and the registration statements (File Nos. 33-89504, 
333-19619, 333-06053, 333-44363 and 333-47877) on Form S-3 of Ross Systems 
Inc. ("the Company") of our report dated September 26, 1996 relating to the 
combined balance sheets of Ross Systems (UK) Limited, Ross Systems France 
SA., Ross Systems Deutschland GmbH, Ross Systems Europe NV., and Ross Systems 
Netherlands BV as of June 30, 1996 and the related combined statements of 
operations and stockholders' equity for the year then ended and the related 
schedule, which report appears in the June 30, 1997 annual report on Form 
10-K/A of the Company.

Our report dated September 26, 1996 contains an explanatory paragraph that 
states that the Company declined to present a statement of cash flows for the 
year ended June 30, 1996. Presentation of such statement summarising the 
Company's operating, investing and financing activities is required by 
generally accepted accounting principles.


KPMG
Chartered Accountants
Registered Auditors
Bristol, United Kingdom
April 30, 1998
2nd Revision 2/26/04 by C. Cinalli using new engineering report

J:\process\postfocu\FY2004cases\P040139.sr\P040139c.en1.wpd dated 2/26/2004, 5:07

Changes are in bold and 2 scenarios were deleted.

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P040139 Assessor: Cinalli

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#: 1 Number of Release Sites: . 

Release Activity:

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE

Total Releases:

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Release Days/yr:

Per Site Release:

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day)

Remarks:

Consumer use expected?
Revised 2/19/04

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P040139 Assessor: Lee

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#: 2 Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity:

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE

Total Releases:

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Release Days/yr:

Per Site Release:

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day)

Remarks:

 
Revised 2/19/04

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

CASE NUMBER: P040139
EXHIBIT
10.7




NOTE
EXTENSION







Calabria
Advisors, LLC hereby extends the due date on the following notes from
Speedemissions, Inc. to July 1, 2005:





	
      Date
      of Note
	 	
      Principal
      Amount
	 	
      Original
      Due Date
	 
	
      September
      29, 2004
	 	
      $
	
      5,900
	 	 	
      March
      29, 2005
	 
	
      October
      28, 2004
	 	
      $
	
      9,900
	 	 	
      April
      28, 2005
	 
	
      December
      17, 2004
	 	
      $
	
      9,800
	 	 	
      June
      17, 2005
	 






Other
than as set forth above, the remaining terms and conditions of the original
notes remain in effect. Dated effective March 29, 2005.

 


	
      Calabria
      Advisors, LLC
	 	
      Speedemissions,
      Inc.

	 	 	 
	/s/
      Richard Parlontieri	 	/s/
      Bahram Yusefzadeh
	
      By: Richard
      Parlontieri
	 	
      By: Bahram
      Yusefzadeh

	 	 	
      Its: Director
BEFORE AFTER
AFTER
BEFORE
AFTER


AFTER AFTER
BEFORE
BEFORE
AFTER
AFTER-AFTER

BEFORE

AFTER
BEFORE
AFTER
AFTER
AFTER


AFTER
The facility’s medical room was transformed into our School Store, La Bodega 

AFTER
La Bodega Ribbon Cutting & Tours 
AFTER
AFTER
BEFORE
Project Mixtape Music Production Studio 

Sponsored by Warner Music 

AFTER
Project Mixtape Music Production Studio 

Sponsored by Warner Music 

AFTER
 

 

 

ON APRIL 26, 2023, THE HCJPD JUVENILE BOARD APPROVED THE NAME CHANGE 

FROM THE BURNETT BAYLAND REHAB CENTER TO THE OPPORTUNITY CENTER 

“THIS NEW NAME IS PERFECT AS IT TRULY REFLECTS WHAT IS HAPPENING THERE; PROVIDING OPPORTUNITIES TO 

YOUNG PEOPLE AND THE COMMUNITY. FOR ME, THIS SOLIDIFIES THE DIRECTION THAT WE WANT YOUTH JUSTICE 

TO TAKE IN HARRIS COUNTY; BECOMING A SYSTEM THAT DELIVERS OUR YOUNG PEOPLE THE SKILLS, TOOLS, AND 

SUPPORTS THEY NEED TO BE ABLE TO THRIVE”- HENRY GONZALES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, HARRIS COUNTY 

JUVENILE PROBATION DEPARTMENT
Case 4:22-cr-00255-Y Document 44 Filed 11/30/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 96
Case 4:22-cr-00255-Y Document 44 Filed 11/30/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 97
<PAGE>
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2
<PAGE>
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2003

The undersigned certify that, to their knowledge, the Form 10-K of Wilmington
Trust Corporation ("Wilmington Trust") for 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Wilmington Trust.

                            /s/ Ted T. Cecala
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Ted T. Cecala
                            Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

                            /s/ David R. Gibson
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            David R. Gibson
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trimol Group Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
covered in the Report.

                                          /s/ Yuri Benenson
                                          -----------------
                                          Yuri Benenson
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          TRIMOL GROUP, INC.

May 15, 2003


                                       11
# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee will hold a meeting on March 7, 2000, at the Convention Center, Harrah's Lake Tahoe, Highway 50, Stateline, NV. This Committee, established by the Secretary of Agriculture on December 15, 1998, (64 FR 2876) is chartered to provide advice to the Secretary of Agriculture on December 15, 1998, (64 FR 2876) is chartered to provide advice to the Secretary on implementing the terms of the Federal Interagency Partnership on the Lake Tahoe Region and other matters raised by the Secretary.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held March 7, 2000, beginning at 9:00 a.m. and ending at 4:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Convention Center, Harrah's Lake Tahoe, Highway 50, Stateline, NV.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ed Gee or Jeannie Stafford, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, Forest Service, 870 Emerald Bay Road Suite 1, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150, (530) 573-2642.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The committee will meet jointly with the Lake Tahoe Basin Executives Committees. Items to be covered on the agenda include: (1) Budget Subcommittee, Communications Subcommittee & Watershed Assessment Subcommittee Reports; (2) California, Nevada and Federal Land Acquisition Processes; (3) Status of Renewing the Charter; (4) Washoe Lake Access; (5) Updating the Environmental Improvement Program (EIP); (6) Open Public Comment; (7) Vehicle Miles Traveled, US Postal Service Master Plan; (8) Status Report on the Lake Tahoe Science Advisory Team; (9) Lake Tahoe Watershed Assessment, Adaptive Management. All Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend. Issues may be brought to the attention of the Committee during the open public comment period at the meeting or by filing written statements with the secretary for the Committee before or after the meeting. Please refer any written comments to the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit at the contact address stated above.

Dated: February 4, 2000.

Maribeth Gustafson,

Acting Deputy Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 00-3130  Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Exhibit 10.4

                  SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

      The following sets forth a summary of the compensation arrangements for
the non-employee members of the Board of Directors (the "Non-Employee
Directors") of Nelnet, Inc. (the "Company") for 2005.

      Non-Employee Directors receive an annual retainer of $50,000. The Company
also pays an additional annual retainer of $10,000 to those Non-Employee
Directors who serve on the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, or the Executive Committee of the
Board of Directors, as applicable. Non-Employee Directors also earn a fee of
$1,000 for each Board meeting attended and $1,000 for each committee meeting
attended.

      Prior to the Company's December 2003 initial public offering of its Class
A common stock, the Board of Directors adopted, and the shareholders approved, a
share-based compensation plan for Non-Employee Directors pursuant to which
Non-Employee Directors can elect to receive their annual retainer fees in the
form of cash or the Company's Class A common stock. A copy of the plan document
has been previously filed as an exhibit to Company filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. Up to 100,000 shares may be issued under the plan,
subject to antidilution adjustments in the event of certain changes in the
Company's capital structure. If a Non-Employee Director elects to receive Class
A common stock, the number of shares of Class A common stock that will be
awarded will be equal to the amount of the annual retainer fee otherwise payable
in cash divided by 85% of the fair market value of a share of Class A common
stock on the date the fee is payable. Non-Employee Directors who choose to
receive Class A common stock may also elect to defer receipt of the Class A
common stock until termination of their service on the Board of Directors. Any
dividends paid in respect of deferred shares during the deferral period will
also be deferred in the form of additional shares and paid out at termination
from the Board of Directors.

      This plan may be amended or terminated by the Board of Directors at any
time, but no amendment or termination will adversely affect a Non-Employee
Director's rights with respect to previously deferred shares without the consent
of the Non-Employee Director.
#### HUFFSTUTLER v. STATE.

No. 20738.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 10, 1940.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft of cattle; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trimol Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 
 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.
 
 No purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose.  The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.
 
 
 /s/ Boris BirshteinBoris BirshteinChief Executive OfficerTRIMOL GROUP, INC.
 
 
 August 18, 2009
 
 
 [A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Trimol Group, Inc. and will be retained by Trimol Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
_____________________________________ 

Page 63 is not included in this copy. 

Pages through are not included in this copy. 

_______________________________________________________________ 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information: 

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

_____ Identity of product impurities. 

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

_____ Description of quality control procedures. 

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__X___ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

_____ FIFRA registration data. 

____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) ____. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical 

 composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source 

 of the ingredient. 

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege. 

____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency. 

_____ Internal Deliberative Information. 

 

 

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product 

registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who 

prepared the response to your request. 

_________________________________________________________________
#### KING v. STATE.

No. 20102.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 25, 1939.

M. E. Lawrence, of Eastland, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is driving an automobile upon a public, highway while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $100 and confinement in jail for 90 days.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The-judgment is affirmed.

*291PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.