alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration 

          - [Docket No. 00N-1506] 

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Guidance for Industry on How to Use E-Mail to Submit a Notice of Final Disposition of Animals Not Intended For Immediate Slaughter” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Denver Presley, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1472. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of September 21, 2000 (65 FR 57193), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0453. The approval expires on November 30, 2003. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets.                 

Dated: December 5, 2000. 

Margaret M. Dotzel, 

Associate Commissioner for Policy. 

[FR Doc. 00-31480 Filed 12-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
*OPINION ISSUED OCTOBER 29, 2007*

#### DONNA E. GRAZIANI VS. DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES

(CC-07-229)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Ronald R. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice *60of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks $228.50 for taxes that she was overcharged when she obtained a West Virginia license plate for her 1992 Toyota Camry on August 15,2006. Claimant alleges that she should not have been charged for these taxes since the vehicle was purchased in West Virginia.

In its Answer, respondent admits the validity of the claim in the sum of $162.50, rather than in the amount of $228.50. Although the respondent states that its policy is to not provide refunds after six (6) months, it acknowledges that the claimant should not have been overcharged for the taxes. In claimant’s reply to respondent’s Answer, the claimant admits that the amount of taxes that she was overcharged on August 15, 2006 was in fact $162.50.

Accordingly, the Court makes an award to claimant in the amount of $162.50.

Award of $162.50.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

George Edward Hernandez, Jr., 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-30213

D.C. No. 3:16-cr-05358

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Robert J. Bryan, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 8, 2019

Seattle, Washington

Before: GOULD and PAEZ, Circuit Judges, and JACK,** District Judge.

George Hernandez, Jr. (“Hernandez”), plead guilty to one count of 

possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, methamphetamine, in 

violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A), and one count of possession 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Janis Graham Jack, United States District Judge for 

the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation.

FILED

MAR 20 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

of a firearm during and in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 

U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A). On appeal, he challenges the district court’s decision 

denying his motion to withdraw guilty plea and asserts that the appellate waiver in 

his guilty plea does not bar this appeal. We have jurisdiction over this appeal 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

1. Whether a defendant waived his right to appeal is reviewed de novo. 

United States v. Rivera, 682 F.3d 1223, 1227 (9th Cir. 2012). When a court 

informs a defendant of a right to appeal, “the court’s oral pronouncement defeats a 

written appeal waiver.” United States v. Aguilar-Muniz, 156 F.3d 974, 977 (9th 

Cir. 1998). Here, the magistrate judge ambiguously preserved Hernandez’s right 

to appeal.

2. A denial of a motion to withdraw guilty plea by a district court is 

reviewed for abuse of discretion. United States v. Ruiz, 257 F.3d 1030, 1033 (9th 

Cir. 2001) (en banc). In order to withdraw a guilty plea, a defendant must present 

the district court with “a fair and just reason for requesting the withdrawal.” Fed. 

R. Crim. P. 11(d)(2)(B). Information that was already known to the defendant or 

which the defendant had access to cannot be used as the basis of a motion to 

withdraw guilty plea. See United States v. Fitzhugh, 78 F.3d 1326, 1329 (8th Cir. 

1996). Further, a defendant cannot base his or her motion on receiving inadequate 

legal counsel when counsel discussed the specific issues upon which defendant 
3 

now bases his or her motion to withdraw guilty plea. United States v. Mayweather, 

634 F.3d 498, 506 (9th Cir. 2010). Given that Hernandez based his motion on the 

possibility of new evidence gleaned from legal strategies already discussed by 

previous counsel prior to his plea agreement, the district court did not abuse its 

discretion in denying the motion.

AFFIRMED.
N: 673409

E: 1242911.91

N: 667787.47

E: 1242276.8

N: 666933.49

E: 1242558.4

N: 667947.55

E: 1247834.49

N: 667695.57

E: 1247811.84

N: 673228.21

E: 1243223.95

N: 662710.507313

E: 1234455.18919

N: 662120.543751

E: 1252189.54097

N: 684418.829793

E: 1235186.19391

N: 683829.453751

E: 1252902.88479

N: 667694.15

E: 1248058.87

N: 667944.01

E: 1248058.74

N: 673113.04

E: 1243308.87

N: 673267.45

E: 1243270.27

N: 673538.32

E: 1243066.96

N: 673021.04

E: 1243204.65

N: 667330.75

E: 1242852.01

N: 667496.84

E: 1242812.29

N: 667749.88

E: 1242611.11

N: 667158.53

E: 1242265.75

Figure 1

EAB Base Boundary

Operable Units and Other Areas of Concern

Ellsworth AFB, South Dakota

0 1,000 2,000 4,000 1 Feet

Legend

Installation Boundary

Operable Units (OU's) and

Other Areas of Concern

(AOC's) To Be Deleted

Building

Airfield

Installation Road

Ó

Ó

Ó

Ó

Date: June 10, 2011

Source: Notice Of Intent June 2006

OU-1

Gateway Lake

Ash AOC

Pride Hangar

AOC
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (To Come)
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (To Come)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001011888
<NAME>                        DIATIDE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>         
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1
<CASH>                                       16,995,476
<SECURITIES>                                  4,763,007
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             22,023,316
<PP&E>                                        2,604,980
<DEPRECIATION>                                1,642,506
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               22,996,573
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         3,274,001
<BONDS>                                          10,584
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                      12,103
<COMMON>                                         10,526
<OTHER-SE>                                   19,689,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 22,996,573
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              2,520,000
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              3,766,822
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,128,695)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,128,695)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,128,695)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">New Way Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of Manuel Lema, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>American Transit Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Jodi Orlow, J.), entered May 22, 2013. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>Ultimate Health Prods., Inc. as Assignee of Tamezan Osmali v American Tr. Ins. Co.</i> (___ Misc 3d ___, 2016 NY Slip Op ___ [appeal No. 2013-1479 Q C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.</p><p>Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Elliot, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: March 15, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<PAGE>

                                                           EXHIBIT 23.2

The Board of Directors
Ross Systems Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements 
(File Nos. 33-42036, 33-48226, 33-56584, 33-72168, and 33-89128) on Form S-8
and the registration statements (File Nos. 33-89504 and 333-19619) on Form S-3
of Ross Systems Inc. ("the Company") of our report dated September 26, 1996
relating to the combined balance sheets of Ross Systems (UK) Limited, Ross
Systems France SA., Ross Systems Deutschland GmbH, Ross Systems Europe NV.,
and Ross Systems Netherlands BV as of June 30, 1996 and the related combined 
statements of operations and stockholders' equity for the year then ended and 
the related schedule, which report appears in the June 30, 1997 annual report 
on Form 10-K of the Company.

Our report dated September 26, 1996 contains an explanatory paragraph that 
states that the Company declined to present a statement of cash flows for the 
year ended June 30, 1996. Presentation of such statement summarising the 
Company's operating, investing and financing activities is required by 
generally accepted accounting principles.


KPMG
Chartered Accountants
Registered Auditors
Bristol, United Kingdom
September 25, 1997
SERVE D FEBRUAR Y23 , 2Q3, ; 

### -^ARTMEN TO F

::>NSPORWiO N ;KET0PtRATI0N 3 m rE 3 2L i Aq:2 8

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH EMATTE RO F HAJOC A WATERWORK S FA A DOCKE T No . CP10SW001 8 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-121 3 

### ORDE R O F DISMISSA L O n Decembe r

6 , 2010 , th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n ("Complainant" ) file d aComplaint . O n Novembe r 29 , 2010 , Hajoc aWaterwork s ("Respondent" ) ha dfile dit s Reques t for Hearing . O n February 17 , 2011 , Responden t withdre w it s reques t

for a hearing , citin g settlement . 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.21 5 states : "A t an y tim e befor e o r

durin g ahearing , an agenc y attorne y ma y withdra w acomplain t o r part y ma y withdra w areques t for ahearin g withou t th e consen t

of th e administrativ e la w judge . If a n agenc y attorne y withdraw s th e complain t

o r apart y withdraw s th e reques t for ahearin g an dth e answer , th e administrativ e la w judg e shal l dismis s th e proceeding s unde r thi s subpart withprejudice. " WHEREFORE , Respondent' s Withdrawa l o f Reques t fo r Hearin g havin g bee n rea dan dconsidered , i t

i s ORDERE D a s follows :- . --:.«!'#-•''! " memmm-f S

1 . Respondent ' s Withdrawa l o f It s Reques t

for Hearin g b e withprejudice . granted ; an d''"'' " """"' ^ "" ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ hereb y 2 . Thi s proceedin g b e an di s Iw&by^ismisse d S O ORDERED .

Attachmen t - Servic e Lis t 

# LA^^nk^ ^ Richar d C . Goodwi n jt l n J i^*^«iistrativ e LawJudg e



### '&:m: i ? H

' ?4b' ?/ FA A Docke t No . CP10SW001 8 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ' ON ECOP Y Danie l R . Flynn , Respondent' s Counse l Seyfart hShaw , LL P 13 1 Sout hDearborn St. , Suite 240 0 Chicago , I L6060 3 TEL : 312-460-500 0 FAX : 322-460-700 0 Jame s Archier , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Southwes t

Region , ASW- 7 'Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 260 1 MeachamBlvd . Fort Worth , T X 7613 7 TEL : 817-222-509 9 FAX : 817-222-5945/509 2 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX ; 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, S . W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 76000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-30923]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice Before Waiver With Respect to Land at Buffalo Niagara 
International Airport, Buffalo, New York

AGENCY:  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent of waiver with respect to land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is publishing notice of the proposed release of 
approximately 21 acres of land, also referred to as 455 Cayuga Road, at 
Buffalo Niagara Internatinal Airport for long term lease for non-
aeronautical development. There are no impacts to the Airport and the 
land is not needed for airport development as shown on the Airport 
Layout Plan. Fair Market Value lease payments will be paid over a 40-
year term to the Airport Sponsor, and used for capital development of 
the airport.
    Any comments the agency receives will be considered as a part of 
the decision.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 4, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered in 
triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Philip Brito, Manager, 
FAA New York Airports District Office, 600 Old Country Road, Suite 446, 
Garden City, New York 11530.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Mr. Lawrence Meckler, Executive Director, 
Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, at the following address: 
Mr. Lawrence Meckler, Executive Director, Niagara Frontier 
Transportation Authority, 181 Ellicott Street, Buffalo, New York 14203.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Philip Brito, Manager, New York 
Airports District Office, 600 Old Country Road, Suite 446, Garden City, 
New York 11530; telephone (516) 227-3803; FAX (516) 227-3813; E-Mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8fdfe7e6e3e6ffa1cdfde6fbe0cfe9eeeea1e8e0f9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="12427a7b7e7b623c50607b667d527473733c757d64">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 5, 2000, new authorizing 
legislation became effective. That bill, the Weldell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century, Pubic Law 10-181 (Apr. 
5, 2000; 114 Stat. 61) (AIR 21) requires that a 30 day pubic notice 
must be provided before the Secretary may waive any condition imposed 
on an interest in surplus property.

    Issued in Garden City, New York on October 3, 2000.
Philip Brito,
Manager, New York Airports District Office, Eastern Region.
[FR Doc. 00-30923 Filed 12-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MedImmune, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David M. Mott, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/DAVID M. MOTTDavid M. Mott
Chief Executive Officer
March 4, 2003 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 24.7








Power of Attorney


(RadiSys Form 10-K)





The undersigned constitutes and appoints SCOTT GROUT and BRIAN BRONSON, and each of them, as the undersigned's true and lawful attorneys and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for the undersigned and in the undersigned's name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the RadiSys Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do any and all acts and things necessary or advisable to be done, as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys and agents or either of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney, in the capacity indicated, as of the date set forth below.





Dated:  March 1, 2011








/s/ M. NIEL RANSOMSignatureM. Niel RansomType or Print Name
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20302

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANDRE DENNILE THOMAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-00-CR-712-1

--------------------

December 12, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Andre Dennile Thomas appeals his conviction for being a felon

in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 922(g)(1). Thomas contends that the interstate commerce

element of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional on its face

and as applied to him.

 Thomas’s challenge to the indictment as being defective for

alleging merely that the firearm he possessed was possessed in

and affected interstate commerce fails because the language of

his indictment tracks the language of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and
No. 01-20302 

-2-

alleges each of the elements of the offense. See United States

v. Arlen, 947 F.2d 139, 145 (5th Cir. 1991).

Thomas challenges this court’s jurisprudence regarding the

constitutionality of § 922(g). However, as this court recently

reaffirmed, “the constitutionality of § 922(g) is not open to

question.” See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518

(5th Cir. 2001)(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6158
CARL GREEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOHN LAMANNA, Warden of FPC Edgefield in his official capacity, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (3:06-cv-02377-PMD) Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 20, 2007 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carl Green, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Carl Green, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Green v. LaManna , No. 3:06-cv-02377-PMD (D.S.C. filed Jan. 22, 2007; entered Jan. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED