alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, Thomas F. August, President and Chief Executive Officer, of Prentiss Properties Trust (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”): 

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section78o(d)); and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theRegistrant. 

 

/s/ Thomas F. August 

Thomas F. August 

President & Chief Executive Officer 

November 12, 2003 

 

STATE OF TEXAS§ 

COUNTY OF DALLAS§ 

 

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 12th day of November, 2003. 

 

/s/ Lana Mann

Lana Mann 

November 12, 2003 

 

Notary Public 

My Commission Expires: 5/26/2005 

Official Seal 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, **or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,** has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-108710, 333-76844) and Form S-8 (No. 333-105579, 333-105578,
333-90402, 333-74838, 333-60408, 333-59272, 333-79241, 333-28481, 333-28527, 033-99540, 033-50678, 033-46165) of MedImmune, Inc. of our reports dated February 13, 2004, except for
Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, as to which the date is February 25, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statements schedule, which
appear in this Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
March 9, 2004
McLean, Virginia

---
Honorable Robert S. Calvert 

Comptroller af Public Accounts 

Capitol Station 

Austin, Texas 

Opinion No. WW-1117 

Dear Mr. Calvert: 

Re: Constitutionality of Section 

4 of Article 6243e, Vernon's 

Civil Statutes. 

You have 

tions: 

requested an opinion on the following ques- 

"1. 

"2 . 

Is the provisions of Section 4 of 

the Firemen's Pension Commission Act 

Bection 4 of Article 6243e, V.C.SJ 

still valid. Should you answer question No. 1 :n the affirmative then 

answer No. 2.. 

Is the Comptroller required to set out 

in a separate appropriation $5C,OOO.O0 

of the $300,000.00 appropriated for each 

year of the biennium." 

Section 4 of Article 6243e prcvides as follows: 

"The State Treasurer shall, not later than 

the first day of May of each year after this 

Act takes effecf, apportion and pay over to the 

various Boards of Trustees, upon a pro rata ratio 

basis of the insurance written upon property 

within the corporate limits of such city or town, 

all moneys coming into his hands annually from 

the gross premium receipts tax herein provided; 

save and except, the sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) less expenses of administration 

as herein provided, the balance of which shall 

be kept and retained by the State Treasurer in 

the said Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund 
Honorable Robert S. Calvert, page 2 (WW-1117) 

as an emergency reserve fund for the purpose herein provided." 

The gross premium receipts tax referred to in Section 4 was held unconstitutional in American Alliance Ins. 

co. v. Board of Insurance Commissioners, 126 S.W.2d 741 

‘(Civ.App. 1939, error ref.). Since the "gross premium 

receipts tax" from which payment by the Treasurer was to 

be made to the various Boards of Trustees was held unconstitutional, such provisions can have no force and effect 

and, therefore, the provisions of Section 4 of Article 6243e, 

Vernon's Civil Statutes, are void and unenforceable. American 

Alliance Ins. Co. v. Board of Insurance Commissioners, supra. 

In other words, the provisions of Section 4 are incapable of 

being severed from the provisions of Section 2, which were 

held unconstitutional in American Alliance Ins. Co. v. Board 

of Insurance Commissioners, supra. 

SUMMARY 

Section 4 of Article 6243e, Vernon's 

Civil Statutes, providing for an apportionment from the gross premium 

receipts tax (held invalid in 1939) is 

void and unenforceable, since its provisions are incapable of being severed 

from the invalid portions of the Act. 

Yours very truly, 

WILL WILSON 

Attorney General of Texas 

JR:ms 

.-., By &d& /jj 

J John Reeves 

Assistant 
. 

Honorable Robert S. Calvert, page 3 (WW-1117) 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

W. V. Geppert, Chairman 

Elmer McVey 

Morgan Nesbitt 

Bob Eric Shannon 

Thomas Burrus 

REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

By: Houghton Brownlee, Jr.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of ESB Financial Corporation (the
Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By: /s/ Charlotte A. ZuschlagCharlotte A. ZuschlagPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date:
March 11, 2011

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been
provided to ESB Financial Corporation and will be retained by ESB Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STORAGE USA, INC.
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                               AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO
                             1993 OMNIBUS STOCK PLAN


         This amended and restated Amendment No. 4, dated as of November 4, 1998
to the Storage USA, Inc. 1993 Omnibus Stock Plan, as amended, recites and
provides as follows:

         WHEREAS, at a meeting held on November 4, 1998 the Board of Directors
of Storage USA, Inc. (the "Company") amended the Company's 1993 Omnibus Stock
Plan (the "Plan"), pursuant to paragraph 19 of the Plan, to: (i) increase the
number of options to purchase shares of the Company's Common Stock granted to
non-employee directors from 1000 to 2000; and (ii) to change the date of such
option grant from the last day of the year to the day of the Company's third
quarter earnings release, provided such release is made following the close of
the principal exchange upon which the Company's shares are listed.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the following amendment to the Plan is hereby adopted:

         Paragraph 6(h)(ii) is deleted in its entirety and the following
         substituted therefor:

         Each non-employee director will receive an annual automatic grant of
         options to purchase 2000 shares of the Company's Common Stock, to be
         awarded on the date of the Company's third quarter earnings release
         (provided such release is made after the close of the principal stock
         exchange upon which the Company's stock is listed), at the closing
         stock price on such date, which options shall vest on such date.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 4 to be
         executed as of the date first above written.



                                STORAGE USA, INC.



                                By:   /s/ John W. McConomy
                                      --------------------
                                Name: John W. McConomy
                                Its:  Executive Vice President, General Counsel
                                             and Secretary
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Form 10-KSB of McIntosh Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), William K. Malone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James P. Doyle, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    William K. MaloneWILLIAM K. MALONE Chief Executive
OfficerMarch 30, 2004




/s/    James P. DoyleJAMES P. DOYLE Chief Financial Officer and Accounting
OfficerMarch 30, 2004




This certification accompanies
this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-18-00376-CR

Style: Oscar Axcel Duron

v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed: November 19, 2018

Type of motion: Second Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: August 17, 2018

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: October 16, 2018

Date Requested: December 6, 2018

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted in part and dismissed as moot in part

If document is to be filed, document due: December 6, 2018

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Terry Jennings________

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: __November 27, 2018_____
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 76275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31006]



[[Page 76275]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Alaska Land Managers Forum

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is published in accordance with section 10(a)(2) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) and 
41 CFR 101-6.1015(b). The Department of the Interior hereby gives 
notice of a public meeting of the Alaska Land Managers Forum (ALMF) to 
be held on Thursday, December 14, 2000, beginning at 9:00 a.m. It will 
take place in conference room B, Department of the Interior, 1689 C 
Street, Anchorage, Alaska. This meeting will be held to receive and 
discuss work group reports and informational briefings on recreation 
and tourism, and to announce the winners of the 2000 ALMF Tourism 
Awards Program.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronald B. McCoy at (907) 271-5485 or 
Sally Rue at (907) 465-4084.

Marilyn Heiman,
Special Assistant to the Secretary for Alaska, Department of the 
Interior, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-31006 Filed 12-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RP-P
J-S61032-14 

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. 

 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Appellee 

 v. 

LONNIE DALE WINGROVE, JR., 

 Appellant 

 

: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF 

: PENNSYLVANIA 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: No. 641 WDA 2014 

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered April 2, 2014, 

In the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County, 

Criminal Division, at No(s): CP-26-CR-0001430-2013 

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., WECHT, and STRASSBURGER,* JJ. 

MEMORANDUM BY: STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED OCTOBER 8, 2014 

Lonnie Dale Wingrove, Jr., (Appellant), appeals from the judgment of 

sentence entered following his guilty plea to one count of indecent assault - 

complainant less than 13 years of age.1 After review, we affirm. 

 In July of 2013, Appellant was arrested and charged with sexually 

assaulting his paramour’s minor daughter in May of that year. On January 

8, 2014, Appellant pled guilty to the above-mentioned offense, graded as a 

misdemeanor of the first degree. On April 2, 2014, Appellant was sentenced 

to a term of two-and-one-half to five years’ incarceration. Additionally, 

Appellant was designated by the trial court as a sexually violent predator 

(SVP). As a result, Appellant was ordered to comply with the lifetime 

 

1

 18 Pa.C.S. § 3126(a)(7). 
J-S61032-14 

-2-

registration and quarterly reporting requirements of the Sex Offender 

Registration and Notification Act (SORNA).2

Appellant timely filed a motion to reconsider his sentence, which was 

denied on April 21, 2014. This timely appeal followed. Both the trial court 

and Appellant complied with the requirements of Pa.R.A.P. 1925. 

On appeal, Appellant argues that the registration and reporting 

requirements imposed by SORNA are punitive in nature, manifestly 

excessive, and thus, constitutionally infirm. Appellant’s Brief at 8. 

Our Courts have considered, and rejected, the issue raised by 

Appellant multiple times. These prior decisions reason the imposition of the 

registration and notification requirements does not constitute punishment. 

See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Williams, 832 A.2d 962, 986 (Pa. 2003) 

(upholding as non-punitive the registration, notification, and counseling 

provisions of Megan’s Law II); Commonwealth v. Rhoads, 836 A.2d 159 

(Pa. Super. 2003) (same). More recently, this Court upheld the 

constitutionality of SORNA’s registration requirements in Commonwealth v. 

Perez, -- A.3d --, 2014 WL 3339161 (Pa. Super. July 9, 2014). 

Appellant has failed to convince us that another constitutional analysis 

of SORNA should produce a different result. Accordingly, we determine that 

Appellant is not entitled to relief. 

 

2

 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9799.10-9799.41. 
J-S61032-14 

-3-

 Judgment of sentence affirmed. 

Judgment Entered. 

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. 

Prothonotary 

Date: 10/8/2014
|                                    |
|------------------------------------|
|                                    |  |  |
| ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES         | EXTREME NETWORKS | PHOTRONICS |
| ADVENT SOFTWARE                    | FUSION-IO | POWER INTEGRATIONS |
| ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS      | GLOBECOMM SYSTEMS | PROGRESS SOFTWARE |
| ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR    | GUIDEWIRE SOFTWARE | QAD |
| AMERICAN SCIENCE & ENGINEERING | HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY | RAMBUS |
| ANRITSU                            | INFINERA | REALNETWORKS |
| APPLIED MICRO CIRCUITS             | INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE | ROSETTA STONE |
| ASPEN TECHNOLOGY                   | INTRALINKS | RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES |
| ATMI                               | IRIDIUM SATELLITE | SEMTECH |
| AVIAT NETWORKS                     | IXIA | SERVICE-NOW.COM |
| AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES               | KOFAX | SERVICESOURCE |
| BLACKBAUD                          | LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR | SHORETEL |
| CABOT MICROELECTRONICS             | M/A-COM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS | SILICON IMAGE |
| CALIX                              | MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES | SMSC |
| CAVIUM                             | MARKEM-IMA JE | SONUS NETWORKS |
| COGNEX                             | MELLANOX TECHNOLOGIES | SYMMETRICOM |
| COHU                               | MERCURY COMPUTER SYSTEMS | TELENAV |
| COMMVAULT SYSTEMS                  | MICREL SEMICONDUCTOR | TESSERA TECHNOLOGIES |
| COMSCORE                           | MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS | THE ACTIVE NETWORK |
| CRAY                               | NETSCOUT SYSTEMS | TIVO |
| DATALINK                           | NETSUITE | TOPPAN PHOTOMASKS |
| DEALERTRACK                        | NOVATEL WIRELESS | TYLER TECHNOLOGIES |
| ELECTRO SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES      | OCLARO | ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY |
| ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS            | PEGASYSTEMS | VICOR |
| EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA - SJ     |   | WEBSENSE |
| EXACTTARGET                        |   |   |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
ImmuLogic Pharmaceutical Corporation on Form  S-8 (File Nos. 33-89024,
33-89020, 33-89022, 33-50858, 33-42489, 33-42552, 33-41921, 333-08423 and
333-08425) of our report dated January 30, 1997, except for the information
contained in Note M as to which the date is March 5, 1997 on our audit of the
consolidated financial statements of ImmuLogic Pharmaceutical Corporation as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1996, and to the inclusion of the report in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.


                                                 /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
                                                 ----------------------------
                                                 COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.




Boston, Massachusetts
March 27, 1997
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PR ECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Eric D. Tessner, Petitioner,

v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2009-143986

Appeal From Florence County Michael G. Nettles, Trial Judge Thomas A. Russo, Post-Conviction Relief Judge

Memorandum Opinion No. 2012-MO-021 Submitted May 23, 2012 – Filed June 6, 2012

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General David Spencer, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from the denial of his application for post-c onviction relief (PCR).Because there is sufficient evidence to support the PCR judge's finding that petitioner did not knowingly and intelligently wa ive his right to a direct appeal, we grant certiorari on petitioner's Question I and proceed with a review of the direct appeal issue pursuant to Davis v. State , 288 S.C. 290, 342 S.E.2d 60 (1986). We deny the petition for a writ of certiorari as to petitioner's Question II.

Petitioner's convictions and sentences are affirmed pur suant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: Mincey v. Arizona , 437 U.S. 385 (1978); State v. Wright , 391 S.C. 436, 706 S.E.2d 324 (2011).

AFFIRMED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY , KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ.,

concur.
Order entered October 7, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00319-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.B.B., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JC-17-00832

ORDER

By letter filed October 2, 2020, appellant informs the Court that the 

reporter’s record that has been filed in this appeal does not include the exhibits that 

were admitted into evidence. We construe the letter as a motion to supplement the 

reporter’s record. We GRANT the motion and ORDER Pamela K. Sumler, 

Official Court Reporter for the 305th Judicial District Court, to file, no later than 

October 19, 2020, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of the three 

exhibits admitted into evidence at the February 7, 2020 bill of review hearing.

On our own motion, we EXTEND THE DEADLINE for filing appellant’s 

brief to October 29, 2020.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. 

Sumler and the parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZHANGUO QUI,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-70369

Agency No. A099-445-647

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 8, 2012** 

Before: ALARCÓN, BERZON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Zhanguo Qui, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our

FILED

AUG 14 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-70369

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

factual findings, Molina-Morales v. INS, 237 F.3d 1048, 1050 (9th Cir. 2001), and

we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Qui’s contention that he is eligible for

asylum and withholding of removal as a member of a particular social group of

“property owners in a specific area that were all affected by the same road project”

because he did not raise this claim to the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d

674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (this court lacks jurisdiction to review contentions not

raised before the BIA).

 Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Qui did not

demonstrate past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution on

account of a protected ground. See Dinu v. Ashcroft, 372 F.3d 1041, 1044-45 (9th

Cir. 2004) (petitioner failed to establish authorities imputed a political opinion to

him); see also Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2009) (“[t]he

Real ID Act requires that a protected ground represent ‘one central reason’ for an

asylum applicant’s persecution”). Accordingly, Qui’s asylum and withholding of

removal claims fail. See Molina-Morales, 237 F.3d at 1052.
3 09-70369

Finally, Qui does not raise any arguments in his opening brief regarding the

agency’s denial of his CAT claim. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256,

1259 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not supported by argument are deemed waived).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
; ‘. OFFICE OF ‘I-NE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAR 

I b AUSTIN 

0-O.L(uuc 

'Ytn+ .letter o? Soptanber 10th advifbee that thara 

madned an Ma8@enbd belanee in this had an August Sl* 

lW& and auk8 the optiion of this Departf#ent an $0 whatbar 

this balahoe,,Pnder tbs q'idbr oxi ths..ourmnt apin'o~rlatlon 

to your dopa%?Qner&t, may be ecf,Pended duringc tho ourrant fisoal 

year to dafrap oxpaneer ineu?md in admiaisterl~ the Vital 

Statietioe AOt. 
1 

Your quoutlon i8 uuwored lo. tho *imlativ~r mo