75300 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 232 / Friday, December 1, 2000 / Notices

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19

CFR 207.2(f)).

2Commissioner Askey finds a reasonable

indication that an industry in the United States is

threatened with material injury.

3The product covered by this investigation is

solid, fertilizer grade ammonium nitrate, whether

prilled, granular or in other solid form, with or

without additives or coating, and with a bulk

density equal to or greater than 53 pounds per cubic

foot. Specifically excluded from this investigation

is solid ammonium nitrate with a bulk density less

than 53 pounds per cubic foot (commonly referred

to as industrial or explosive grade ammonium

nitrate).

Concessioner

identification No. Concessioner name Park

YELL303 ..................... Yellowstone Alpen Guides ................................................... Yellowstone National Park

YELL304 ..................... International Leisure Hosts .................................................. Yellowstone National Park

YELL400 ..................... Ace Snowmobile Rentals ..................................................... Yellowstone National Park

YELL401 ..................... Gary Fales Outfitting ............................................................ Yellowstone National Park

YELL402 ..................... Backcountry Adventures ...................................................... Yellowstone National Park

YELL403 ..................... Yellowstone Arctic-Yamaha ................................................. Yellowstone National Park

YELL404 ..................... Loomis Enterprises, Inc. ...................................................... Yellowstone National Park

YELL405 ..................... Pahaska Tepee .................................................................... Yellowstone National Park

YELL406 ..................... Yellowstone Adventures ...................................................... Yellowstone National Park

YELL407 ..................... Targhee Snowmobile Tours ................................................ Yellowstone National Park

YELL408 ..................... Two Top Snowmobile Rental, Inc. ...................................... Yellowstone National Park

YELL409 ..................... Three Bears Lodge, Inc. ...................................................... Yellowstone National Park

YOSE006 .................... Robert F. & John D. Bevington ........................................... Yosemite National Park

YUCH001 .................... E.A. Adventures ................................................................... Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve.

ZION001 ...................... Bryce/Zion Trail Rides ......................................................... Zion National Park

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 2, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Cynthia Orlando, Concession Program

Manager, National Park Service,

Washington, DC, 20240, Telephone

(202) 565–1210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All of the

listed concession authorizations will

expire by their terms on or before

December 31, 2000. The National Park

Service has determined that the

proposed short-term extensions are

necessary in order to avoid interruption

of visitor services and has taken all

reasonable and appropriate steps to

consider alternatives to avoid such

interruption. These extensions will

allow the National Park Service to

complete and issue prospectuses

leading to the competitive selection of

concessioners for new longer-term

concession contracts covering these

operations.

Dated: November 22, 2000.

Cynthia Orlando,

Acting Associate Director, Park Operations

and Education.

[FR Doc. 00–30657 Filed 11–30–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731–TA–894

(Preliminary)]

Certain Ammonium Nitrate From

Ukraine

Determination

On the basis of the record 1 developed

in the subject investigation, the United

States International Trade Commission

determines, pursuant to section 733(a)

of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.

1673b(a)), that there is a reasonable

indication that an industry in the

United States is materially injured 2 by

reason of imports from Ukraine of

certain ammonium nitrate 3 provided for

in subheading 3102.30.00 of the

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

United States, that are alleged to be sold

in the United States at less than fair

value (LTFV).

Commencement of Final Phase

Investigation

Pursuant to section 207.18 of the

Commission’s rules, the Commission

also gives notice of the commencement

of the final phase of its investigation.

The Commission will issue a final phase

notice of scheduling which will be

published in the Federal Register as

provided in section 207.21 of the

Commission’s rules upon notice from

the Department of Commerce

(Commerce) of an affirmative

preliminary determination in the

investigation under section 733(b) of the

Act, or, if the preliminary determination

is negative, upon notice of an

affirmative final determination in that

investigation under section 735(a) of the

Act. Parties that filed entries of

appearance in the preliminary phase of

the investigation need not enter a

separate appearance for the final phase

of the investigation. Industrial users,

and, if the merchandise under

investigation is sold at the retail level,

representative consumer organizations

have the right to appear as parties in

Commission antidumping and

countervailing duty investigations. The

Secretary will prepare a public service

list containing the names and addresses

of all persons, or their representatives,

who are parties to the investigation.

Background

On October 13, 2000, a petition was

filed with the Commission and the

Department of Commerce by the

Committee For Fair Ammonium Nitrate

Trade (‘‘COFANT’’) whose members

include Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.,

Allentown, PA; Mississippi Chemical

Corp., Yazoo City, MS; El Dorado

Chemical Co., Oklahoma City, OK; La

Roche Industries, Inc., Atlanta, GA; and

Nitram, Inc., Tampa, FL, alleging that an

industry in the United States is

materially injured or threatened with

material injury by reason of LTFV

imports of certain ammonium nitrate

from Ukraine. Accordingly, effective

October 13, 2000, the Commission

instituted antidumping duty

investigation No. 731–TA–894

(Preliminary).

Notice of the institution of the

Commission’s investigation and of a

public conference to be held in

connection therewith was given by

posting copies of the notice in the Office

of the Secretary, U.S. International

Trade Commission, Washington, DC,

and by publishing the notice in the

Federal Register of October 20, 2000 (65

FR 63093). The conference was held in

Washington, DC, on November 3, 2000,

and all persons who requested the

opportunity were permitted to appear in

person or by counsel.

The Commission transmitted its

determination in this investigation to

the Secretary of Commerce on

November 27, 2000. The views of the

Commission are contained in USITC

Publication 3374 (December 2000),

entitled Certain Ammonium Nitrate

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 232 / Friday, December 1, 2000 / Notices 75301

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19

CFR § 207.2(f)).

from Ukraine: Investigation No. 731–

TA–894 (Preliminary).

Issued: November 27, 2000.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–30672 Filed 11–30–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigations Nos. AA1921–197 (Review),

701–TA–231, 319–320, 322, 325–328, 340,

342, and 348–350 (Review), and 731–TA–

573–576, 578, 582–587, 604, 607–608, 612,

and 614–618 (Review)]

Certain Carbon Steel Products From

Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,

Finland, France, Germany, Japan,

Korea, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland,

Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and

United Kingdom

Determinations

On the basis of the record 1 developed

in the subject five-year reviews, the

United States International Trade

Commission determines, pursuant to

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930

(19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that

revocation of the countervailing duty

orders and antidumping duty orders on

the following certain carbon steel

products from the specified countries

would likely lead to continuation or

recurrence of material injury to an

industry in the United States within a

reasonably foreseeable time:

Country

Cut-tolength

plate

Corrosionresistant

Australia .......... 731–TA–612

Belgium ........... 701–TA–

319

731–TA–

573

Brazil ............... 701–TA–

320

731–TA–

574

Canada ............ 731–TA–614

Finland ............. 731–TA–

576

France ............. 701–TA–348

731–TA–615

Germany .......... 701–TA–

322

731–TA–

578

701–TA–

349 2

731–TA–

616 2

Japan ............... 731–TA–617

Korea ............... 701–TA–350

731–TA–618

Country

Cut-tolength

plate

Corrosionresistant

Mexico ............. 701–TA–

325

731–TA–

582

Poland ............. 731–TA–

583

Romania .......... 731–TA–

584

Spain ............... 701–TA–

326

731–TA–

585

Sweden ........... 701–TA–

327

731–TA–

586

Taiwan ............. AA1921–

197 2

United Kingdom 701–TA–

328 3

731–TA–

587 3

2 Commissioner Askey dissenting.

3 Chairman Koplan and Commissioner

Askey dissenting.

The Commission determines that

revocation of the countervailing duty

orders and antidumping duty orders on

the following certain carbon steel

products from the specified countries

would not be likely to lead to

continuation or recurrence of material

injury to an industry in the United

States within a reasonably foreseeable

time:

Country

Cut-tolength

plate

Corrosionresistant

Canada ............ 731–TA–

575

Germany .......... 701–TA–

340 4

731–TA–

604 4

Korea ............... 701–TA–

342 4

731–TA–

607 4

Netherlands ..... 731–TA–

608 4

Sweden ........... 701–TA–231

4 Commissioners Bragg and Miller

dissenting.

Background

The Commission instituted these

reviews on September 1, 1999 (64 FR

47862) and determined on December 3,

1999, that it would conduct full reviews

(64 FR 71494, December 21, 1999).

Notice of the scheduling of the

Commission’s reviews and of public

hearings to be held in connection

therewith was given by posting copies

of the notice in the Office of the

Secretary, U.S. International Trade

Commission, Washington, DC, and by

publishing the notice in the Federal

Register on April 18, 2000 (65 FR

20833). The hearings were held in

Washington, DC, on September 12, 13,

and 15, 2000, and all persons who

requested the opportunity were

permitted to appear in person or by

counsel.

The Commission transmitted its

determinations in these investigations to

the Secretary of Commerce on

November 21, 2000. The views of the

Commission are contained in USITC

Publication 3364 (November 2000),

entitled Certain Carbon Steel Products

from Australia, Belgium, Brazil,

Canada, Finland, France, Germany,

Japan, Korea, Mexico, Netherlands,

Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden,

Taiwan, and United Kingdom:

Investigations Nos. AA1921–197

(Review), 701–TA–231, 319–320, 322,

325–328, 340, 342, and 348–350

(Review), and 731–TA–573–576, 578,

582–587, 604, 607–608, 612, and 614–

618 (Review).

Issued: November 27, 2000.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–30673 Filed 11–30–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

Sanction for Breaches of Commission

Protective Order

AGENCY: International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Sanction for breaches of

Commission protective order.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the

sanction imposed by the Commission

for breaches of the administrative

protective order (‘‘APO’’) issued in

Crawfish Tail Meat From China, Inv.

No. 731–TA–752 (Final). The

Commission found that Steven B. Lehat,

Esq., and Surjit P. Soni, Esq., breached

the APO by (1) delegating primary

responsibility for APO compliance to a

junior attorney and then failing to

provide appropriate supervision of that

attorney, which resulted in two APO

breaches, (2) repeatedly failing to

remedy obvious flaws in their firm’s

procedures for protecting business

proprietary information (‘‘BPI’’) released

to the firm under APO, and (3) failing

to certify to the return or destruction of

the BPI obtained under the APO. As a

sanction, the Commission is issuing this

public reprimand and barring them from

access to BPI for a period of six months