alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1995-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2,565,410
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  147,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,745,025
<PP&E>                                         425,710
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (78,164)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,092,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          210,995
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,881,576
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,092,571
<SALES>                                        71,892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,365
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  25,622<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                67,395
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            67,395
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   67,395
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
[J-72B-2014] [MO: Saylor, C.J.] 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Appellant 

 v. 

JAMES JOHN HVIZDA, 

 Appellee 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 6 MAP 2014 

Appeal from the order of the Superior Court 

at No. 2695 EDA 2012 dated June 25, 2013 

which vacated and remanded the judgment 

of sentence of the Chester County Court of 

Common Pleas, Criminal Division, at No. 

CP-15-CR-0001350-2012 dated August 

27, 2012. 

ARGUED: September 10, 2014 

CONCURRING OPINION 

MR. JUSTICE STEVENS DECIDED: June 15, 2015 

I join the majority. 

Similar to the companion case of Commonwealth v. Carrasquillo, ___ Pa. ___, ___ 

A.3d ___ (2015), I write separately to emphasize my disapproval with the Superior Court’s 

bright-line rule that prohibited, as a matter of law, trial courts from assessing the credibility 

of an “assertion of innocence” made in the context of a presentence motion to withdraw a 

guilty plea. This per se approach, which was based upon the utterance of “magic 

words,” undermined the trial court’s role as a finder of fact and removed necessary 

discretion from the court. I agree with the majority that such an approach was 

unsatisfactory. Trial courts must be permitted to evaluate the credibility of an accused’s 

assertion of innocence, including the evidence of guilt, of delay, and of ulterior or illicit 

motive in ruling upon an accused’s presentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-6913-6] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of settlement extension. 

# SUMMARY:

                        In 1998, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit remanded EPA's decision to not revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for sulfur oxides for further explanation by EPA.                         *American Lung Association*                         v.                         *Browner*, 134 F. 3d 388 (D.C. Cir. 1998). Subsequently, the American Lung Association (ALA) and EPA agreed that EPA would propose a response to the court's remand by summer, 1999 and that EPA would finalize its response to the remand by the end of the year 2000. In exchange, ALA agreed to not file a petition for rehearing en banc with the court and to not pursue any mandatory duty or unreasonable delay claims regarding the remand prior to January, 2001.                     

In September 1999, EPA and ALA met to discuss the status of the remand and agreed to extend the summer, 1999 deadline until January 15, 2000. 

                        Since that time EPA and ALA have continued discussions and EPA has continued to work on the remand. As a result, EPA and ALA have agreed that by the end of 2000, EPA will publish a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         describing the status of the remand and related activities and soliciting appropriate comment. For its part, ALA has agreed not to pursue any mandatory duty or unreasonable delay claims regarding the remand prior to January, 2001.                     

Dated: December 1, 2000. 

Anna Wolgast, 

Acting General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 00-31333 Filed 12-7-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
### NUMBER 13
- 11 - 00544
- CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ IN THE ESTATE OF ROSE MARIE WENDLANDT, DECEASED

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the County C ourt at Law N o. 2

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam This appeal was abated by this Court on February 9, 2012, due to the bankruptcy of one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; see generally T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 8. Since th e abatement there has been no activity in this appeal. On November 1,
2013 , the Court ordered the parties to file an advisory regarding the status of the appeal and, if applicable, a motion to reinstate the appeal or a motion to dismiss the appeal.
The o rder notified the parties that failure to respond to the order would result in reinstatement and dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution.2

The parties have failed to respond. Accordingly, we reinstate and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecutio n. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(b). Any pending motions are
dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed t h e 1 2 t h day of D e c e m b e r , 20 13

.
BPL Exploration, /s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 4, 2014

No. 04-14-00087-CV

CODY TEXAS, L.P.,

Appellant

v.

BPL EXPLORATION, LTD.,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6,097

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 We grant the Zapata County District Clerk’s motion for extension of time to file the 

clerk’s record and order Dora Martinez-Castanon to file the record in this appeal by March 28, 

2014. 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of March, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.02








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Spectrum Select L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period


ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer of Ceres Managed Futures LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




















By:             /s/        Jennifer Magro





Name:                     Jennifer Magro


Title:                       Chief Financial Officer of Ceres Managed Futures LLC,


general partner of the registrant





Date:                      March 29, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

      ( print page 77381)    
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has received Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval for the following public information collections pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 96-511. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. Not withstanding any other provisions of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid control number. Questions concerning the OMB control numbers and expiration dates should be directed to Judy Boley, Federal Communications Commission, (202) 418-0214. 

## Federal Communications Commission

*OMB Control No.:*                     3060-0957.                 

*Expiration Date:*                     04/30/01                 

*Title:*                     Wireless Entrance 911 Service, Fourth MO&O.                 

*Form No.:*                     N/A.                 

*Estimated Annual Burden:*                     7,500.                 

*Description:*                     The Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order is part of the Commission's proceeding to establish a nationwide wireless enhanced 911 emergency communications service. The burden inherent in this decision involves guidelines for filing successful requests for waiver of the E911 Phase II regulation.                 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Magalie Roman Salas, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-31402 Filed 12-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 236 (Thursday, December 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 76703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31141]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Notice of Meeting of the Industry Sector Advisory Committee on 
Services (ISAC-13)

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Industry Sector Advisory Committee on Services will hold a 
meeting on December 12, 2000, from 9 a.m. to 12 noon. The meeting will 
be opened to the public from 9 a.m. to 10 a.m., and closed to the 
public from 10 a.m. to 12 noon.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for December 12, 2000, unless otherwise 
notified.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Department of Commerce, 
Conference Room 1414, located at 14th Street between Pennsylvania and 
Constitution Avenues, NW., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Holderman, (202) 482-0345, 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230 (principal contact), or Dominic Bianchi, Office of 
the United States Trade Representative, 1724 F Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20508, (202) 395-6120.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During the opened portion of the meeting the 
``Status Report on WTO General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) 
Work Program and Preparation for Future GATS Negotiating Meetings'' 
will be discussed.

Dominic Bianchi,
Acting Assistant United States Trade Representative for 
Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-31141 Filed 12-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TIMCO Aviation
Services, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
C. Robert Campbell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                     /s/ C. Robert Campbell
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     C. Robert Campbell
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     August 28, 2002
Exhibit 10.1

2007 Form for New Non-Employee Directors
Restricted Stock Unit AgreementAmendment

YEAR 2000 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION
MANAGEMENT STOCK PLAN
NOTICE OF AMENDMENT TO NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT

UnionBanCal Corporation (the "Company") has amended Section 5(h) of each outstanding Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
under the Year 2000 UnionBanCal Corporation Management Stock Plan (the "Plan") effective July 24, 2007, to provide in its entirety as follows:

Please
retain this Notice of Amendment with your Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement.

|UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION |  |                                                   
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|By                      |  | /s/PAUL FEARERPaul Fearer,Executive Vice President
|Dated: October 25, 2007 |  |                                                   

1

---



QuickLinks
NO. 07-08-0090-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

APRIL 1, 2008

______________________________

BEAU JACKSON FUQUA, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 100TH DISTRICT COURT OF CARSON COUNTY;

NO. 3594; HONORABLE JOHN FORBIS, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Appellant Beau Jackson Fuqua, appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual

assault and punishment of 29 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department

of Criminal Justice. The clerk’s record was filed on March 21, 2008. 

The clerk’s record does not contain a certification by the trial court of appellant’s

right of appeal under Texas Rule of Appellant Procedure 25.2(d). Rule 25 requires the trial

court to enter such a certification “each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other

appealable order.” Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).
2

Consequently, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for

further proceedings. On remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to

secure a Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal in compliance with Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), regarding appellant’s appeal of the trial court’s judgment.

Once executed, the certification shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record and filed

with this Court on or before April 30, 2008. 

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      40,364,313
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  113,349
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,477,662
<PP&E>                                      73,841,817
<DEPRECIATION>                             (10,806,327)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             105,610,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,377,285
<BONDS>                                     39,951,583
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  60,882,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               105,610,994
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,574,042
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,922,505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,041,889
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,609,648
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,609,648
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,609,648
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,447
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,430
<ALLOWANCES>                                       451
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         776,830
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,754
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 806,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           263
<OTHER-SE>                                     453,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   806,649
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,432
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,095
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    111
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,227
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .72
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2

GRAPHIC

February 23,
2009

Cephalon, Inc.
Board of Directors
41 Moores Road,
Frazer, PA 19355

Dear
Directors:

We
are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We
have audited the consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and issued our
report thereon dated February 23, 2009. Note 1 to the financial statements describes a change in accounting principle for certain inventories from last-in,
first-out (LIFO) to first-in,
first-out (FIFO). It should be understood that the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another for inventory costing has not been addressed in any authoritative
accounting literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied on management's determination that this change in accounting principle is preferable. Based on our reading of management's
stated reasons and justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-K, and our discussions with management as to its judgment about the relevant business
planning factors relating to the change, we concur with management that such change represents, in the Company's circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154,Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.

Very
truly yours,

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

---



QuickLinks