alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Medivation, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 9, 2008



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ David T. Hung, M.D.                     
|Name: David T. Hung, M.D.                   
|Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
-82 -81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

36 37 38 39 40 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 09/25 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.11 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
#### HARRIS v. STATE.

No. 15144.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 27, 1932.

L. G. Mathews, of Ploydada, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; punishment being one year in the penitentiary.

No bills of exception are brought forward seeking review of anything occurring during the trial. The charge of the court seems to he a fair presentation of the law, both from the standpoint of the appellant and the state. No objection was urged thereto in any particular.

 The sole question is the sufficiency of the evidence. Appellant was the proprietor of a hotel in South Plains, Floyd county. In making a search of the hotel, peace officers found two one-half gallon jars of whisky, one apparently being in the possession of a relative of appellant at the time it was taken possession of by the officers, and the other half gallon jar being found under the kitchen floor at a point where some boards had been sawed out for the purpose of installing a water heater. A great many empty jars and bottles were found in different places about the hotel. They all bore traces of having contained intoxicating liquor at one time. Appellant admitted that he had purchased both of the jars of whisky found by the officers, but claimed that he had bought it for medicinal purposes for his wife’s grandfather, who was an elderly man and spent part of the time at the hotel with appellant and his wife. The jury was told, in substance, that, under the laws of this state, appellant could possess any amount of intoxicating liquor,.unless the same was possessed for the purpose of sale, and were instructed that if appellant possessed the intoxicating liquor either as a medicine or as a beverage, .and not for the purpose of sale, he would not be guilty of any offense. The jury was further told that if appellant had the whisky for use as a medicine .by his wife’s grandfather, or if they had a reasonable doubt thereof, they would acquit him. The finding of the jury upon the issues of fact, is binding on this court. The evidence is sufficient to support the judgment, and the same, is ordered affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 238 (Monday, December 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77389-77390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31370]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NV-930-1430-EQ; N-73883]

Notice of Realty Action: Commercial Lease of Public Lands

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management.

ACTION: Commercial lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Notice of Realty Action involves a long term lease of 
public lands administered by the Bureau of Land management in Clark 
County, Nevada. The lease is intended to authorize Buffalo Westcliff 
Ltd. Partnership (N-73883) to utilize the land for a public parking 
lot, in conjunction with their private land, and subject to a right-of-
way granted to Nevada Power Company (N-51943).
    The land has been examined and found suitable for Commercial 
Leasing under (43 U.S.C. 2920). The legal description of the site is as 
follows:

Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada

T. 20 S., R. 60 E.,
    Sec.28,S\1/2\NE\1/4\SE\1/4\.

    Containing .69 acres, more or less, located at Buffalo and the 
south side of Summerlin Parkway.

    The site will be leased on a non-competitive basis. More detailed 
information is available for review at the Las Vegas Field Office, 
Bureau of land Management, 4765 Vegas Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89108. 
Contact Naomi Hatch at 702/647-5084.

[[Page 77390]]

    Reimbursement of costs shall be in accordance with the provisions 
of 43 CFR 2920.6.
    For a period of 45 days from the date of publication of this notice 
in the Federal Register, interested parties may submit comments to the 
Assistant Field Manager, Division of Lands, Las Vegas Field Office, 
4765 Vegas Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89108. Any adverse comments will be 
evaluated by the Assistant Field Manager, Division of Lands who may 
vacate or modify this Realty Action and issue a final determination. In 
the absence of any action by the Assistant Field Manager, Division of 
Lands, this Realty Action will become the final determination of the 
Bureau.

    Dated: November 22, 2000.
Cheryl A. Ruffridge,
Acting Assistant Field Manager, Division of Lands, Las Vegas, Nevada.
[FR Doc. 00-31370 Filed 12-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
```
April 29, 2015

Mr. Michael Huerta, Administrator

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue Southwest

Washington, D.C. 20591

Dear Mr. Huerta:

I write to you today in support of the petition submitted by Eagle-Eye Drone Service. It is my understanding that the 

petition requests approval of the use of unmanned aerial systems for use in the real estate industry.

More specifically, this Michigan-based company plans to utilize small, unmanned aerial systems to perform aerial 

photography for marketing opportunities, and inspection purposes. The clever use of these systems will undoubtedly 

increase sales of homes and businesses, and reduce the risks associated with standard inspection methods.

I am told by the project’s sponsor that this unique service will utilize and comply with all FAA standards and collect vital 

flight information to help improve FAA rulemaking process.

I appreciate your attention in this matter, and trust that you will give the merits of Eagle-Eye Drone Service’s proposal 

adequate consideration. Should you need to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Dan Benishek M.D.

Member of Congress

Michigan’s 1st District
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 Company Report
 
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:     March 22, 2011

/s/ Keith R. StewartKeith R. StewartChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)Date:     March 22, 2011
    /s/ William McGrathWilliam McGrathSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
```

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Robert A.  MacFarlane,  Chief Executive  Officer of Homes For
America  Holdings,  Inc.,  a Nevada  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                        s/s Robert A. MacFarlane
                                        ------------------------
                                        Robert A. MacFarlane
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        August 14, 2002
```
#### UNITED EMPLOYERS CASUALTY CO. v. McGEE et al.

No. 2286.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Sept. 26, 1940.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 17, 1940.

Will R. Saunders and Claude Williams, both of Dallas, and Norton Fox, of Groes-beck, for plaintiff in error.

Reed & Cannon, of Groesbeck, and Johnson & Oliphant, of Dallas, for defendants in error.

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This cause was attempted to be removed to this court by writ of error. The defendants in error have filed motions to dismiss the appeal because the writ of error was not perfected in time. The case was tried in the lower court on August 18, 1939. The plaintiff in error participated in the trial. Petition and bond for writ of error were filed in December, 1939, but citation in error was not issued nor served until after January 1, 1940.

In the case of United Employers Casualty Company v. Skinner, 141 S.W.2d 955, we had before us a state of facts almost identical with those found in this case and we there held that the writ of error was not perfected prior to January 1, 1940, and that under the provisions of Acts 1939, 46 Leg., p. 59, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, art. 2249a, the defendant who had participated in the actual trial of the case in the lower court could not have the judgment of the lower court reviewed through writ of error proceedings. The Supreme Court refused writ of error in that case. Based on the hqlding therein, we here hold that this court is without jurisdiction to review this case on writ of error.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.
AMENDMENT NO. 1 


TO


ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES, INC.


2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


 


This Amendment No. 1 amends the Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan as follows:


 





	
            1. 
 	
            Effective as of September 30, 2008, the first sentence of Section 3.2(b) is modified to read:
 






 


The Committee shall establish the Restriction Period for each Stock Award which, except for Stock Awards granted to newly hired employees, shall be no less than one year, in the case of Stock Awards subject to Performance Measures, and three years, in the case of all other Stock Awards.


 





	
            2. 
 	
            Section 5.8(a)(2)(a) is clarified to read:
 






 


(a) in the case of an option or Stock Appreciation Right, the number of Common Shares then subject to such option or Stock Appreciation Right, multiplied by the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value of a Common Share on the date of occurrence of the Change in Control, over the purchase price or grant price, as the case may be, per Common Share subject to the option or Stock Appreciation Right 


 


 


 


____________________________




	
            The 2006 Stock Incentive Plan was adopted and approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors on September 25, 2006 and approved by the Stockholders on November 14, 2006.  These amendments should be read in conjunction with the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, a copy of which has been filed as an exhibit to ECD’s Proxy Statement dated October 12, 2006.
March 2, 2012

Mr. Maurice J. Montgomery, Jr. Manager – Flight Operations United Continental Holdings, Inc.

233 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606

Dear Mr. Montgomery:

This is in response to your November 3, 2011 letter (public docket No. FAA-2007-0209) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of United Continental Holdings, Inc. (United/Continental) for an extension to exemption No. 9621. That exemption from § 121.619 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows United/Continental, their certificated dispatchers, and their pilots in command (PIC) to dispatch aircraft to domestic airports without designating an alternate for the destination airport, where, for at least 1 hour before and 1 hour after the estimated time of arrival at the destination airport, the appropriate weather reports or forecasts, or any combination of them, indicate the ceiling will be at least 1,000 feet above the airport elevation and visibility will be at least 3 statute miles.

On December 21, 2011, the FAA issued exemption No. 8653E to United/Continental. This exemption combined Exemption No. 8653 and Exemption No. 9621. The exemption also included all of the provisions and limitations of Operations Specification C355 (exemption to § 121.619 for domestic destination alternate airport requirements). A copy of this exemption is enclosed for your information.

Because the relief you seek is now covered under exemption No. 8653, as amended, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
`Exhibit 10.126












                                                     November 16, 2000


Mr. Franklin H. Top, Jr., M.D.
c/o MedImmune, Inc.
35 W. Watkins Mill Road
Gaithersburg, MD 20878


Dear Frank:

                  Reference is made to your Employment Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1998 (the "Employment Agreement"), with
MedImmune, Inc. (the "Company").

                  The Employment Agreement is hereby amended so that the Employment Period referred to in Section 2 thereof is
extended to November 1, 2002.  All other provisions of the Employment Agreement remain unchanged.

                                                     Very truly yours,

                                                     MEDIMMUNE, INC.


                                                     By: /s/ David M. Mott
                                                            David M. Mott
                                                            Chief Executive Officer

Accepted and agreed to by:



/s/ Franklin H. Top, Jr., M.D.
Franklin H. Top, Jr., M.D.

Date:     1/5/01`
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2049 

To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 to increase support for conservation practices under the emergency conservation program, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2017 

Mr. MORAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 to increase 

support for conservation practices under the emergency 

conservation program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENTS FOR EMERGENCY CONSERVATION 

4 PROGRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Agricultural Credit Act of 

6 1978 is amended by inserting after section 403 (16 U.S.C. 

7 2203) the following: 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2049 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 403A. PAYMENTS FOR EMERGENCY CONSERVATION 

2 PROGRAM. 

3 ‘‘The maximum cost-share payment under section 

4 701.127 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (or suc5 cessor regulations), shall be equal to the maximum 

6 amount under section 701.226(b) of title 7, Code of Fed7 eral Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment 

8 of this section).’’. 

9 (b) ADMINISTRATION.—Until the date on which any 

10 regulations necessary to carry out section 403A of the Ag11 ricultural Credit Act of 1978 (as added by subsection (a)) 

12 are fully implemented, the Secretary shall continue to 

13 carry out sections 401, 402, and 403 of that Act (16 

14 U.S.C. 2201, 2202, 2203) in the same manner as on the 

15 day before the date of enactment of this Act, except that 

16 payments made under those sections shall be consistent 

17 with section 403A of that Act (as added by subsection 

18 (a)). 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

 

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (FormS-8 Nos. 33-43001, 33-49234, 333-27613, 333-31464, 333-31379, 333-61002, 333-95725, and 333-125062 and Form S-3 No. 333-101514) of ESB Financial Corporation of our reports dated March 1, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of ESB Financial Corporation and subsidiaries, ESB Financial Corporation management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofESB Financial Corporation, included in the 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders of ESB Financial Corporation, which is incorporated by reference in the Annual Report Form 10-K of ESB Financial Corporation. 

 

 

 

/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C. 

 

Wexford, Pennsylvania 

March 12, 2007
H. R. 1430

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

An Act

To provide for a temporary increase in the public debt limit.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT.

During the period beginning on the date of the enactment

of this Act and ending on September 30, 1993, the public debt

limit set forth in subsection (b) of section 3101 of title 31, United

States Code, shall be temporarily increased to $4,370,000,000,000.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Joe McMILLAN v. STATE.

No. 15815.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 8, 1933.

See, also, 57 S.W.(2d) 125.

Henry Tirey, of Dallas, for appellant

Uloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.'

Conviction is for the sale of intoxicating liquor; punishment being, imprisonment in the penitentiary for one year.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. The proceedings appear to be regular. No error calling for reversal is apparent.

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1293 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1293

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase in 
the amount payable by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to veterans for 
   improvements and structural alterations furnished as part of home 
                            health services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disabled Veterans Home Improvement 
and Structural Alteration Grant Increase Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN AMOUNT AVAILABLE TO DISABLED VETERANS FOR 
              IMPROVEMENTS AND STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS FURNISHED AS PART 
              OF HOME HEALTH SERVICES.

    (a) Increase.--Section 1717(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``$4,100'' and 
        inserting ``$6,800''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``$1,200'' and 
        inserting ``$2,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to a veteran who first applies for benefits under 
section 1717(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, on or after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Applicability.--A veteran who exhausts such veteran's 
eligibility for benefits under section 1717(a)(2) of title 38, United 
States Code, before the date of the enactment of this Act, is not 
entitled to additional benefits under such section by reason of the 
amendments made by subsection (a).

            Passed the House of Representatives July 28, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1293

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase in 
the amount payable by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to veterans for 
   improvements and structural alterations furnished as part of home 
                            health services.
```
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07437

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

07437\07437_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

07437\07437_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07437\07437_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07437\07437_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07437\07437_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07437\07437_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07437\07437_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07437\7437_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07437\Certification Statement Plant ID 07437.pdf Plant certification statement

x 07437\Questions7437.doc Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 07437\Supplemental Documents\07437_MCGS A5-2.jpg Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07437\Supplemental Documents\07437_MCGS A5-3.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07437\Supplemental Documents\07437_MCGS D3-1.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07437\Telecon documents\EPA Steam Electric Questionnaire Michigan City_2.rtf Technical Review Correspondence

x 07437\Telecon documents\Fw EPA Steam Electric Questionnaire Michigan City.rtf Technical Review Correspondence

x 07437\Telecon documents\Re EPA Steam Electric Questionnaire 7437- NOx Controls.rtf Technical Review Correspondence

07437\Supplemental Documents\07437_ICR CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0565

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID STANLEY, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 15, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 9 2022

05/09/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0565