Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 6, 2000 / Notices 76211

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Newspapers Used for Publication of

Legal Notice of Appealable Decisions

for the Intermountain Region; Utah,

Idaho, Nevada, and Wyoming

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice lists the

newspapers that will be used by all

ranger districts, forests, and the

Regional Office of the Intermountain

Region to publish legal notice of all

decisions subject to appeal under 36

CFR 215 and 36 CFR 217. The intended

effect of this action is to inform

interested members of the public which

newspapers will be used to publish

legal notices of decisions, thereby

allowing them to receive constructive

notice of a decision, to provide clear

evidence of timely notice, and to

achieve consistency in administering

the appeals process.

DATES: Publication of legal notices in

the listed newspapers will begin with

decisions subject to appeal that are

made on or after December 1, 2000. The

list of newspapers will remain in effect

until June 1, 2001, when another notice

will be published in the Federal

Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Barbara Schuster, Regional Appeals

Manager, Intermountain Region, 324

25th Street, Ogden, UT 84401, and

Phone (801) 625–5301.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

administrative appeal procedures 36

CFR 215 and 36 CFR 217, of the Forest

Service require publication of legal

notice in a newspaper of general

circulation of all decisions subject to

appeal. This newspaper publication of

notices of decisions is in addition to

direct notice to those who have

requested notice in writing and to those

known to be interested and affected by

a specific decision.

The legal notice is to identify: the

decision by title and subject matter; the

date of the decision; the name and title

of the official making the decision; and

how to obtain copies of the decision. In

addition, the notice is to state the date

the appeal period begins which is the

day following publication of the notice.

The timeframe for appeal shall be

based on the date of publication of the

notice in the first (principal) newspaper

listed for each unit.

The newspapers to be used are as

follows:

Regional Forester, Intermountain

Region

For decisions made by the Regional

Forester affecting National Forest in

Idaho:

The Idaho Statesman, Boise, Idaho

For decisions made by the Regional

Forester affecting National Forests

in Nevada:

The Reno Gazette-Journal, Reno,

Nevada

For decisions made by the Regional

Forester affecting National Forests

in Wyoming:

Casper Star-Tribune, Casper,

Wyoming

For decisions made by the Regional

Forester affecting National Forests

in Utah:

Salt Lake Tribute, Salt Lake City, Utah

If the decision made by the Regional

Forester affects all National Forests

in the Intermountain Region, it will

appear in:

Salt Lake Tribune, Salt Lake City,

Utah

Ashley National Forest

Ashley Forest Supervisors decisions:

Vernal Express, Vernal, Utah

Vernal District Ranger decisions:

Vernal Express, Vernal, Utah

Flaming Gorge District Ranger for

decisions affecting Wyoming:

Casper Star Tribune, Casper,

Wyoming

Flaming Gorge District Ranger for

decisions affecting Utah:

Vernal Express, Vernal, Utah

Roosevelt and Duchesne District Ranger

decisions:

Uintah Basin Standard, Roosevelt,

Utah

Boise National Forest

Boise Forest Supervisor decisions:

The Idaho Statesman, Boise, Idaho

Mountain Home District Ranger

decisions:

The Idaho Statesman, Boise, Idaho

Idaho City District Ranger decisions:

The Idaho Statesman, Boise, Idaho

Cascade District Ranger decision:

The Long Valley Advocate, Cascade,

Idaho

Lowman District Ranger decisions:

The Idaho World, Garden Valley,

Idaho

Emmett District Ranger decisions:

The Messenger-Index, Emmett, Idaho

Bridger-Teton National Forest

Bridger-Teton Forest Supervisor

decision:

Casper Star-Tribune, Casper,

Wyoming

Jackson District Ranger decision:

Casper Star-Tribune, Casper,

Wyoming

Buffalo District Ranger decisions:

Casper Star-Tribune, Casper,

Wyoming

Big Piney District Ranger decisions:

Casper Star-Tribune, Casper,

Wyoming

Pinedale District Ranger decisions:

Casper Star-Tribune, Casper,

Wyoming

Greys River District Ranger decisions:

Casper Star-Tribune, Casper,

Wyoming

Kemmerer District Ranger decisions:

Casper Star-Tribune, Casper,

Wyoming

Caribou-Targhee National Forest

Caribou-Targhee Forest Supervisor

decisions for the Caribou portion:

Idaho State Journal, Pocatello, Idaho

Soda Springs District Ranger decisions:

Idaho State Journal, Pocatello, Idaho

Montpeler District Ranger decisions:

Idaho State Journal, Pocatello, Idaho

Westside District Ranger decisions:

Idaho State Journal, Pocatello, Idaho

Caribou-Targhee Forest Supervisor

decisions for the Targhee Portion:

The Post Register, Idaho Falls, Idaho

Dubois District Ranger decisions:

The Post Register, Idaho Falls, Idaho

Island Park District Ranger decisions:

The Post Register, Idaho Falls, Idaho

Ashton District Range decisions:

The Post Register, Idaho Falls, Idaho

Palisades District Ranger decisions:

The Post Register, Idaho Falls, Idaho

Teton Basin District Ranger decisions:

The Post Register, Idaho Falls, Idaho

Dixie National Forest

Dixie Forest Supervisor decisions:

The Daily Specturm, St. George, Utah

Pine Valley District Ranger decisions:

The Daily Spectrum, St. George, Utah

Cedar City District Ranger decisions:

The Daily Spectrum, St. George, Utah

Powell District Ranger decisions:

The Daily Spectrum, St. George, Utah

Escalante District Ranger decisions:

The Daily Spectrum, St. George, Utah

Teasdale District Ranger decisions:

The Daily Spectrum, St. George, Utah

Fishlake National Forest

Fishlake Forest Supervisor decisions:

Richfield Reaper, Richfield, Utah

Loa District Ranger decisions:

Richfield Reaper, Richfield, Utah

Richfield District Ranger decisions:

Richfield Reaper, Richfield, Utah

Beaver District Ranger decisions:

Richfield Reaper, Beaver, Utah

Fillmore District Ranger decisions:

Richfield Reaper, Fillmore, Utah

Humboldt—Toiyabe National Forests

Humboldt—Toiyabe Forest Supervisor

decisions for the Humboldt portion:

76212 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 6, 2000 / Notices

Elko Daily Free Press, Elko, Nevada

Humboldt-Toiyabe Forest Supervisor

decisions for the Toiyabe portion:

Reno Gazette-Journal, Reno, Nevada

Sierra Ecosystem Coordination Center

(SECO):

Carson District Ranger decisions:

Reno Gazette-Journal, Reno, Nevada

Bridgeport District Ranger, decisions:

The Review-Herald, Mammoth Lakes,

California

Spring Mountains National Recreation

Area Ecosystem (SMNRAE):

Spring Mountains National Recreation

Area District Ranger decisions:

Las Vegas Review Journal, Las Vegas,

Nevada

Central Nevada Ecosystem (CNECO):

Austin District Ranger decisions:

Reno Gazette-Journal, Reno, Nevada

Tonopah District Ranger decisions:

Tonopah Times Bonanza-Goldfield

News, Tonopah, Nevada

Ely District Ranger decisions:

Ely Daily Times, Ely, Nevada

Northeast Nevada Ecosystem (NNECO):

Mountain City District Ranger decisions:

Elko Daily Free Press, Elko, Nevada

Ruby Mountains District Ranger

decisions:

Elko Daily Free Press, Elko, Nevada

Jarbidge District Ranger decisions:

Elko Daily Free Press, Elko, Nevada

Santa Rosa District Ranger decisions:

Humboldt Sun, Winnemucca, Nevada

Manti-Lasal National Forest

Manti-LaSal Forest Supervisor

decisions:

Sun Advocate, Price, Utah

Sanpete District Ranger decisions:

The Pyramid, Mt. Pleasant, Utah

Ferron District Ranger decisions:

Emery County Progress, Castle Dale,

Utah

Price District Ranger decisions:

Sun Advocate, Price, Utah

Moab District Ranger decisions:

The Times Independent, Moab, Utah

Monticello District Ranger decisions:

The San Juan Record, Monticello,

Utah

Payette National Forest

Payette Forest Supervisor decisions:

Idaho Statesman, Boise, Idaho

Weiser District Ranger decisions:

Signal American, Weiser, Idaho

Council District Ranger decisions:

Council Record, Council, Idaho.

New Meadows, McCall, and Krassel

District Ranger decisions:

Star News, McCall, Idaho

Salmon-Challis National Forests

Salmon-Challis Forest Supervisor

decisions for the Salmon portion:

The Recorder-Herald, Salmon, Idaho

Salmon-Challis Forest Supervisor

decisions for the Challis portion:

The Challis Messenger, Challis, Idaho

North Fork District Ranger decisions:

The Recorder-Herald, Salmon, Idaho

Leadore District Ranger decisions:

The Recorder-Herald, Salmon, Idaho

Salmon/Colbalt District Ranger

decisions:

The Recorder-Herald, Salmon, Idaho

Middle Fork District Ranger decisions:

The Challis Messenger, Challis, Idaho

Challis District Ranger decisions:

The Challis Messenger, Challis, Idaho

Yankee Fork District Ranger decisions:

The Challis Messenger, Challis, Idaho

Lost River District Ranger decisions:

The Challis Messenger, Challis, Idaho

Sawtooth National Forest

Sawtooth Forest Supervisor decisions:

The Times News, Twin Falls, Idaho

Burley District Ranger decisions:

Ogden Standard Examiner, Ogden,

Utah, for those decisions on the

Burley District involving the Raft

River Unit.

South Idaho Press, Burley, Idaho, for

decisions issued on the Idaho

portion of the Burley District.

Twin Falls District Ranger decisions:

The Times News, Twin Falls, Idaho

Ketchum District Ranger decisions:

Idaho Mountain Express, Ketchum,

Idaho

Sawtooth National Recreation Area:

Challis Messenger, Challis, Idaho

Fairfield District Ranger decisions:

The Times News, Twin Falls, Idaho

Uinta National Forest

Uinta Forest Supervisor decisions:

The Daily Herald, Provo, Utah

Pleasant Grove District Ranger

decisions:

The Daily Herald, Provo, Utah

Heber District Ranger decisions:

The Daily Herald, Provo, Utah, and

Spanish Fork District Ranger decisions:

The Daily Herald, Provo, Utah

Wasatch-Cache National Forest

Wasatch-Cache Forest Supervisor

decisions:

Salt Lake Tribune, Salt Lake City,

Utah

Salt Lake District Ranger decisions:

Salt Lake Tribune, Salt Lake City,

Utah

Kamas District Ranger decisions:

Salt Lake Tribune, Salt Lake City,

Utah

Evanston District Ranger decisions:

Uintah County Herald, Evanston,

Wyoming

Mountain View District Ranger

decisions:

Uintah County Herald, Evanston,

Wyoming

Ogden District Ranger decisions:

Ogden Standard Examiner, Ogden,

Utah

Logan District Ranger decisions:

Logan Herald Journal, Logan, Utah

Dated: November 30, 2000.

Jack A. Blackwell,

Regional Forester.

[FR Doc. 00–30999 Filed 12–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–11–M

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Business-Cooperative Service

Maximum Dollar Amount on Loan and

Grant Awards Under the Rural

Economic Development Loan and

Grant Program for Fiscal Year 2001

AGENCY: Rural Business-Cooperative

Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Rural BusinessCooperative Service hereby announces

the maximum dollar amount on loan

and grant awards under the Rural

Economic Development Loan and Grant

(REDLG) program for fiscal year (FY)

2001. The maximum dollar award on

zero-interest loans for FY 2001 is

$450,000. The maximum dollar award

on grants for FY 2001 is $200,000. The

maximum loan and grant awards stated

in this notice are effective for loans and

grants made during the fiscal year

beginning October 1, 2000, and ending

September 30, 2001. REDLG loans and

grants are available to Rural Utilities

Service electric and telephone utilities

to assist in developing rural areas from

an economic standpoint.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia Wing, Loan Specialist, Rural

Business-Cooperative Service, USDA,

STOP 3225, Room 6870, 1400

Independence Avenue, SW,

Washington, DC 20250. Telephone:

(202) 720–9558. FAX: (202) 720–6561.

E-mail: PWing@rus.usda.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

maximum loan and grant awards are

determined in accordance with 7 CFR

1703.28. The maximum loan and grant

awards are calculated as 3.0 percent of

the projected program levels; however,

as specified in 7 CFR 1703.28(b),

regardless of the projected total amount

that will be available, the maximum size

may not be lower than $200,000. The

projected program level during FY 2001

for zero-interest loans is $15 million and

the projected program level for grants is

$3 million. Applying the specified 3.0

percent to the program level for loans

results in the maximum loan award of

$450,000. Applying the specified 3.0

percent to the program level for grants

results in an amount lower than