alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS, BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                               U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       63,263
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      9,679
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          33,283
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   1,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,520
<COMMON>                                         1,193
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       38,902
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             24,047
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  62,142
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,446
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            22,657
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    1,063
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  20,212
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  107,520
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       47,495
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             3,450
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      40,605
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      44,055
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          6,890
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 193
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   7,083
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        (1,383)
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,201
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         49
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    2,201
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         2,137
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          11,644
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30


</TABLE>
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40378

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

VIDAL JARA, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 583

Filed: July 15, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Patrick H. Owen, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of one year, for burglary, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before LANSING, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Vidal Jara, Jr. pled guilty to burglary. I.C. §§ 18-1401, 18-204. In exchange for his 

guilty plea, an additional charge was dismissed and the state agreed not to pursue an allegation 

that Jara was a persistent violator. The district court sentenced Jara to a unified term of seven 

years, with a minimum period of confinement of one year. Jara appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 
2

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Jara’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
#### McVICKER v. STATE.

No. 19783.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 25, 1938.

*69W. E. Myres, of Fort Worth, and E. T. Adams, of Glen Rose, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was charged with a violation of the Liquor Control Act, Vernon’s Ann. P.C. art. 666 — 1 et seq., in that he employed a person under the age of eighteen years to sell and dispense beer on premises where beer was licensed to be sold, etc. He was found guilty by a jury; and fined the sum of $25.00.

There is no properly authenticated statement of facts before us, and we are unable to appraise the only bill of exceptions found in the record on account of the absence of. such statement.

The proceedings appear to be proper and regular, the offense charged being one denounced by the law, and we have no alternative other than to affirm the judgment, which is accordingly done.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-55482) pertaining to the Celtrix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1991 Stock
Option Plan and 1991 Directors' Stock Option Plan, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-42703) pertaining to the Celtrix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1991
Stock Option Plan, 1991 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and 1991 Directors' Stock
Option Plan and in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 33-66008 and No.
333-27263) of Celtrix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated May 28, 1999,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Celtrix
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended March 31, 1999, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                                  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Palo Alto, California
June 29, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                     32,842,206
<SECURITIES>                                7,247,546
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           40,336,161
<PP&E>                                      2,841,529
<DEPRECIATION>                              1,036,722
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             42,573,096
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       2,442,631
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      105,716
<OTHER-SE>                                 40,024,749
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               42,573,096
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               9,836,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          1,213,088
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (8,623,841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (8,623,841)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                              (8,623,841)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.83)
        


</TABLE>
to: Department of Energy via email: expartecommunications@hq.doe.gov

from: Jennifer Cleary

date: October 3, 2014

subject: Ex parte Communication

This memo memorializes the meeting between AHAM and the Department of Energy on 

September 26, 2014, for inclusion in the public docket. In summary, we discussed AHAM’s 

written comments (dated June 9, 2014) on DOE’s Notice of Data Availability for Portable Air 

Conditioners, Docket No. EERE-2014-BT-TP-0014, RIN 1904-AD22. 

The attendees were as follows: 

Ashley Armstrong, DOE

Laura Barhydt, DOE

Tim Sutherland, Navigant

Mike Prager, De’Longhi USA

Paolo Rognini, De’Longhi USA

Stefano Vit, De’Longhi

Jennifer Cleary, AHAM

Sriram Gopal, AHAM

Steve Leybourn, AHAM

Wayne Morris, AHAM
ex-10.60






Exhibit 10.60








	[***] indicates a portion of the exhibit has been omitted based on a request for confidential
treatment submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omitted portions have been filed
separately with the Commission.
Our Telephone: (781) 246-6040
Our Telefax: (781)246-6022
August 18, 2008
Via Email
T.J. Smith & Nephew Limited            Smith & Nephew, Inc.
PO Box 81            P.O. Box 1970
101 Hessle Road            11775 Starkey Road
Hull, HU3 2BN            P.O. Box 1970
United Kingdom            Largo, Florida USA 33779-1970
Attention: Mr. Roger Teasdale
Dear Roger:
Re: Second Amended and Restated License and Development Agreement between NUCRYST
Pharmaceuticals Corp. and NUCRYST Pharmaceuticals Inc. (together “NUCRYST”) and
Smith & Nephew, Inc. and T.J. Smith & Nephew Limited (together “S&N”) made as of
September 30, 2007 (the “Agreement”)
Further to our meeting on April 16, 2008 during which we discussed updating the list of
patents attached to the Agreement, I propose replacing Schedule “B” to the Agreement with
the enclosed updated Schedule “B”.
Kindly indicate your concurrence with my proposal by signing below and returning one copy
of the signed letter to me.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Yours truly,
NUCRYST PHARMACEUTICALS CORP. &
NUCRYST PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Edward Gaj
Vice President, Marketing
DMD/ls
Encls.
Proposal Acknowledged and Accepted;
Signed:
Name:
Date:
For and on behalf of T.I. Smith & Nephew Limited and Smith and Nephew, Inc.
NUCRYST Pharmaceuticals Corp.
50 Audubon Road, Suite B, Wakefield, MA 01880       Telephone: 781 ‘224M444 Fax: 781 •246*6002






 









 





[***] Indicates a portion of the exhibit has been omitted based on a request for confidential
treatment submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omitted portions have been filed
separately with the Commission.




SCHEDULE “B”

NUCRYST PHARMACEUTICALS

PATENTS, PATENT APPLICATIONS AND INVENTION CASES

 





[***]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAHRELL ARRINGTON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 354 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of May, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Grant of Extension of Time PAGE 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21
- 0632 IN THE MATTER OF C.R.F. and M.D.F., Youths in Need of Care. **ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENS ION OF TIME**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s m oti on for extension of time, and good cause appearing therefore, Appellant, K.J.F., is granted an extension of time until March 21, 2022 to prepare, serve, and file the Opening Brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 27 2022

01/27/2022
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative
Supply, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Carmine Catizone, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

/s/Carmine Catizone
-----------------------------
Carmine Catizone
Chief Executive Officer

August 12, 2002
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-15-00066- CR

Shaw n Danene Harty, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 147 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -DC- 13- 3003 38, H ONO RAB LE CLIF F ORD A. B ROW N, JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R AND M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
P ER CURIAM

Shawn Dane ne Har

ty filed her notice of appea l J anuar y 22, 2015, and her brief was orig inally due Apr il 6, 2016. Har

ty ’s appointed counse l Harle y Martin fa iled to file the brief afte r
rec eiving multipl e ex tensions of t i m e t o t al ing 113 day s, afte r an abate ment for the district court’s deter mination of whether Martin had abandone d this appea l, afte r being order ed to f ile appellant’ s brief no la ter than N ovember 22, 2016, and af

ter a show ca use hea ring held Fe bruar

y 1, 2017. The appea l is abate d. We rema nd this cause to the district court with instructions to appoint new counsel for Har ty by Fe bruar

y 24, 2017. The district c ourt shall order the appropr iate supplemental cler

k’s rec ord to be prepa

red and filed with this Court no later than Marc h 17, 2017. See Tex. R. App. P . 38.8(b)( 3).

I t is ordere d on Fe bruar

y 2, 2017.Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices F ield and B ourland

Abated a nd Remanded Filed: F ebrua

ry 2, 2017 Do Not Publish

2
**Exhibit 32****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION***     In connection with the Quarterly Report of AirNet Systems, Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Bruce D. Parker, Chairman of theBoard, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Gary W. Qualmann, Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer and Secretary, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of their knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the consolidated financial condition and results ofoperations of the Corporation and its subsidiaries.   /s/ Bruce D. Parker /s/ Gary W. Qualmann   Bruce D. Parker Gary W. QualmannChairman of the Board, ChiefExecutive Officer and President Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer andSecretary Dated: August 14, 2007 Dated: August 14, 2007 * This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certificationshall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Corporationspecifically incorporates this certification by reference into any such filing.
40
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 173 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 173

  To require the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
              unique ZIP code for particular communities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 17, 2017

 Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Nelson) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
              unique ZIP code for particular communities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ZIP CODES.

    Not later than September 30, 2017, the United States Postal Service 
shall designate a single, unique ZIP code for, as nearly as 
practicable, each of the following communities:
            (1) Ocoee, Florida.
            (2) Miami Lakes, Florida.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MEDIMMUNE,
INC.'S YEARLY REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FILING.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          37,959
<SECURITIES>                                    96,923
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     19,760
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               216,366
<PP&E>                                          74,822
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 353,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,970
<BONDS>                                         83,195
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           547
<OTHER-SE>                                     209,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   353,120
<SALES>                                        163,440
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               200,708
<CGS>                                           70,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  194,514
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,041
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,812
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (47,428)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             56,420
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,240
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.91
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Numerex Corp (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Alan B. Catherall, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates
      and periods covered by the Report.





This
      certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used
      by
      any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by
      law.


March
                23, 2007
            /s/
                Alan B. CatherallAlan
                B. CatherallChief
                Financial Officer, Executive Vice President,
              and
                Principal Financial and Accounting
                Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

February 6, 2013

s0130

Order 

February 6, 2013

145433

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145433

COA: 307480

Wayne CC: 01-003031-01

JUAN WALKER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Wayne County Prosecuting 

Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this 

order. The prosecutor shall pay particular attention to the defendant’s contention that his 

trial counsel was ineffective for failing to inform him of the prosecutor’s September 26, 

2001 offer of a plea bargain to second-degree murder and a sentence agreement of 25 to 

50 years. The prosecutor is to address whether the defendant is entitled to relief under 

Missouri v Frye, 566 US ___; 132 S Ct 1399; 182 L Ed 2d 379 (2012).

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.