alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Summary of the Compensation of the Non-Employee Members of the Board



 Exhibit 10(n) 
 PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION 
 SUMMARY OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE NON-EMPLOYEE MEMBERS

 OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 
 Adopted August 14, 2008, effective October 1, 2008 
  

				
	 Annual retainer for Audit Committee Chair:
	  	$	112,500
	 Annual retainer for Human Resources and Compensation Committee Chair:
	  	$	107,500
	 Annual retainer for each of the chairs of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Finance Committee:
	  	$	105,500
	 Annual retainer for non-chair committee members:
	  	$	97,500

 Meeting fees of $1,500 for attending any Board or Committee meeting during any fiscal year in excess of the number
of regularly scheduled Board or Committee meetings by more than two. 
 Annual restricted stock grant
#### In re Estate of Kirby.

(No. 28605

Decided June 11, 1941.)

*Mr. John Francis Kicah*and *Mr. Joseph Sheban,*for appellant.

*Miss Mary E. Anderson,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, . Williams, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.

Matthias, J., not participating.
Andrew McCollough, Ph.D.

Skyward Regulatory Services

Skyward IO, Inc.

233 SW Naito Parkway Suite 200

Portland, Or 97204

Tel (971) 303-9981

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx

Office of the Secretary

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

The Honorable Michael P. Huerta

Office of the Administrator

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue SW

Washington, DC 20591

July 21, 2015

RE: Amendment to Exemption 11521 Skyward IO, Inc., Regulatory Docket No. FAA2014-0947

On May 11th, 2015, Skyward was issued Exemption No. 11521 (‘Exemption’) for the purpose

of conducting UAS research and development related to the production of data and aerial data

collection, etc., with the DJI Spreading Wings S1000, 3D Robotics X8, 3D Robotics Iris, DJI

Phantom 2, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision+. Skyward now requests an amendment to the Exemption

to allow for additional UAS. Specifically, research and development of data and aerial data using

the additional UAS listed, in compliance with the conditions as approved in Exemption 11521.

We request an amendment to operate the following UAS under the same terms and conditions

contained in the Exemption: the 3DR Solo, the Parrot Bebop, the DJI Inspire, and the DJI Phantom

3. Full descriptions and operating details for the additional UAS may be found in the attached

UAS data sheets excerpted from the Skyward Manual.

The attached UAS data sheets are submitted as confidential under the Freedom of Information Act

5 USC Sec. 552 et seq.

We believe these operations, utilizing these UAS, are at least as safe as equivalent manned aviation

operations for the following reasons. Skyward UASs, as amended, are all less than 55 lb., less than

1.5 m in largest dimension, and travel at less than 100 mph. Full descriptions are available in the

attached Skyward GOM v 2.2.

In addition, the following Exemptions have been granted for the same or similar aircraft types and

commercial uses being requested in this amendment. Similar exemptions include 11062, 11109,

11112, 11213. Exemptions granted with the above SUAS include: (Solo) 11908, 11935, 11832,

(Phantom 3) 11802, 11822, 11801, and (Inspire) 11063, 11279, 11341, and 11509.

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking for only the addition of research and

development of data and aerial data using the additional UAS listed, Skyward respectfully submits
2

that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the

requested amendment.

Please do not hesitate to contact Andrew McCollough, the Professional Services POC, via email at

exemption@skyward.io if you have any questions or concerns.

Very Respectfully Yours,

Andrew McCollough, Ph.D.

Skyward Regulatory Services
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            4772
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1259
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       2556
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                          81285
<ALLOWANCE>                                        661
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   91960
<DEPOSITS>                                       79681
<SHORT-TERM>                                      4464
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                578
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                        7231
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   91960
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   1712
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   65
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  1777
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 778
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 828
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              949
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    312
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         194
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       194
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.50
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   631
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  661
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               661
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of RadiSys Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian Bronson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  | 
|--------------------- |  | 
|/s/    BRIAN BRONSON  |  | 
|Brian Bronson         |  | 
|ChiefFinancialOfficer |  | 
|March 15, 2010        |  |
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 14, 2024

NO. 03

- 23

- 00474

- CV

Levy Architects, PLLC and SVL Ventures, LLLP , Appellant s

v.

Michael Gin , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES SMITH AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on April 27, 2023

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. The

appellant s shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1679 

To amend the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 to increase enforcement of certain violations and strengthen certain transparency requirements. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2017 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To amend the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 

to increase enforcement of certain violations and 

strengthen certain transparency requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foreign Agent Lob5 bying Transparency Enforcement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES. 

7 Section 8 of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 

8 1938 (22 U.S.C. 618) is amended by inserting after sub9 section (c) the following: 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1679 IS

1 ‘‘(d) If the Attorney General determines that any per2 son has engaged in any acts that constitute a violation 

3 of any provision of this Act, or regulations issued there4 under, or if any agent of a foreign principal fails to comply 

5 with any of the provisions of this Act or the regulations 

6 issued thereunder, or otherwise is in violation of this Act, 

7 the Attorney General may impose a civil fine of— 

8 ‘‘(1) not less than $2,500 for the first offense; 

9 ‘‘(2) not less than $5,000 for the second of10 fense; and 

11 ‘‘(3) any amount that the Attorney General de12 termines is appropriate based on the severity and 

13 frequency of the offenses.’’. 

14 SEC. 3. FILING AND LABELING POLITICAL PROPAGANDA. 

15 Section 4 of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 

16 1938 (22 U.S.C. 614) is amended— 

17 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘or circulated 

18 among two or more persons’’ and inserting ‘‘to any 

19 other person’’; and 

20 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(g) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED WITH

22 FILING.—It shall be unlawful for any person within the 

23 United States who is an agent of a foreign principal and 

24 required to register under the provisions of this Act to 

25 transmit or cause to be transmitted in the United States 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1679 IS

1 mails or by any means or instrumentality of interstate or 

2 foreign commerce any informational materials for or in the 

3 interests of such foreign principal without filing with the 

4 Attorney General a statement that includes— 

5 ‘‘(1) the name of each original recipient of the 

6 materials; and 

7 ‘‘(2) the original date on which the materials 

8 will be distributed.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
State of New York

Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to 

revision before publication in the New York Reports.

No. 65 SSM 7

The People &c.,

 Appellant,

 v.

James Ball,

 Respondent.

Submitted by Kenneth H. Tyler, Jr., for appellant.

Submitted by John A. Cirando, for respondent.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, for 

reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (see People v Ball, 175 AD3d 

987 [4th Dept 2019]). Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, 

Wilson and Feinman concur.

Decided June 9, 2020
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-3499

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Brendon Darnell Thomas lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________ Submitted: May 14, 2024 Filed: May 17, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before SMITH, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Brendon Darnell Thomas appeals after he pled guilty to a drug conspiracy charge, pursuant to a written plea agreement containing an appeal waiver, and thedistrict court 1 imposed a below-Guidelines sentence. His counsel has moved to

withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable, and applicable to the issues raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of the validity and applicability of an appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and waiver, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and dismiss this appeal.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Ronnie L. White, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -2-
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 210 

To prohibit the application of certain restrictive eligibility requirements to 

foreign nongovernmental organizations with respect to the provision of 

assistance under part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2017 

Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself, Ms. COLLINS, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, 

Mr. BENNET, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. BROWN, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. CARPER, Mr. COONS, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. 

DURBIN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. FRANKEN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. HARRIS, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. HEINRICH, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. KAINE, Mr. KING, 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. 

MERKLEY, Mr. MURPHY, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. PETERS, Mr. REED, Mr. 

SANDERS, Mr. SCHATZ, Mr. SCHUMER, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. TESTER, 

Mr. UDALL, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. WARREN, Mr. WARNER, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. WYDEN, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. NELSON, Mr. CASEY, and 

Mrs. MCCASKILL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To prohibit the application of certain restrictive eligibility 

requirements to foreign nongovernmental organizations 

with respect to the provision of assistance under part 

I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 210 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Global Health, Em3 powerment and Rights Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE FOR FOREIGN NONGOVERNMENTAL 

5 ORGANIZATIONS UNDER PART I OF THE FOR6 EIGN ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1961. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, regula8 tion, or policy, in determining eligibility for assistance au9 thorized under part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 

10 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.), foreign nongovernmental 

11 organizations— 

12 (1) shall not be ineligible for such assistance 

13 solely on the basis of health or medical services, in14 cluding counseling and referral services, provided by 

15 such organizations with non-United States Govern16 ment funds if such services do not violate the laws 

17 of the country in which they are being provided and 

18 would not violate United States Federal law if pro19 vided in the United States; and 

20 (2) shall not be subject to requirements relating 

21 to the use of non-United States Government funds 

22 for advocacy and lobbying activities other than those 

23 that apply to United States nongovernmental organi24 zations receiving assistance under part I of such 

25 Act. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T APR 19, 2010 J OHN L EY CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 9

- 1 5 7 6 8 N o n
- A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 8

- 0 0 3 1 7

- C R

- W S

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

D I R I C E A M C C A N T S ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f A l a b a m a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( A p r i l 1 9 , 2 0 1 0 )

B e f o r e P R Y O R , M A R T I N a n d F A Y , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :

W i l l i a m G r e g o r y H u g h e s , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r D i r i c e a M c C a n t s i n t h i sd i r e c t c r i m i n a l a p p e a l , h a s m o v e d t o w i t h d r a w f r o m f u r t h e r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e

a p p e l l a n t a n d f

i l e d a b r i e f p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v

. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

.
1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s

t h a t c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e
i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o a r g u a b l e i s s u e s o f m e r i t ,

c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , a n d M c C a n t s ’ s c o n v i c t i o n a n d

s e n t e n c e a r e A F F I R M E D

.

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         585,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  593,718
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    180,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,530,634
<PP&E>                                       2,961,805
<DEPRECIATION>                                 250,770
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,241,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          286,880
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,244
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,130,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,241,669
<SALES>                                      1,656,649
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,656,649
<CGS>                                        1,377,977
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,075,833
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             100,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (447,255)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (447,255)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (447,255)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.40)
        


</TABLE>
^^-^E T OP/Vr[piiS .^/T^/^.O.'O^ . 

.J-. 

':/^_"W^_^ c^" QJi^-^y ^ „ 

'^~i^ZlJS,sU<^^^^ 

-_-[>: -

L _ - - _ 

^^-. 

"r 

;g5... _.--

\p\ 

- ^ > 

r^ 

'J'v ..-

'"^^uiy^ro,. 

^fU~r\uX^ 

\. /M^0ftyr:::^/-Ofy:^':rl^^< , ^
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Form REP-703

Rev. 1, 11/2013

Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 6/26/2014

Sample Number: 142195-001 Date Collected: 06/18/2014 08:25 Date Received: 6/18/2014

Clearwater Pond at Weir 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 6.7 ng/L 2 0.8 TLT 06/20/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142195-002 Date Collected: 06/18/2014 08:30 Date Received: 6/18/2014

Recirculation Pond Inlet 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 3.7 ng/L 1 0.4 TLT 06/20/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142195-003 Date Collected: 06/18/2014 08:30 Date Received: 6/18/2014

FGD Landfill Discharge to Pond 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 24.6 ng/L 20 8 TLT 06/20/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142195-004 Date Collected: 06/18/2014 08:48 Date Received: 6/18/2014

WWTP Outlet 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 12.0 ng/L 10 4 TLT 06/20/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142195-005 Date Collected: 06/18/2014 08:41 Date Received: 6/18/2014

Secondary Clarifier Outlet A 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 9 ng/L J 10 4 TLT 06/20/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142195-006 Date Collected: 06/18/2014 08:45 Date Received: 6/18/2014

Secondary Clarifier Outlet B 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 10 ng/L J 10 4 TLT 06/20/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142195-007 Date Collected: 06/18/2014 08:53 Date Received: 6/18/2014

Primary Clarifier Outlet A 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 164 ng/L 20 8 TLT 06/20/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Amos Plant, 142195 Page 1 of 2
Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 6/26/2014

Sample Number: 142195-008 Date Collected: 06/18/2014 08:55 Date Received: 6/18/2014

Primary Clarifier Outlet B 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 148 ng/L 20 8 TLT 06/20/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142195-009 Date Collected: 06/18/2014 08:59 Date Received: 6/18/2014

WWTP Inlet 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 238000 ng/L 10000 4000 TLT 06/20/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit

J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Amos Plant, 142195 Page 2 of 2