alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM THE NUTRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
               FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30,
               1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
               TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                           <C>            
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS          
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                      JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0                    
<INVENTORY>                                 0     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            0     
<PP&E>                                      0     
<DEPRECIATION>                              0     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              0     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   2,500
<BONDS>                                     0     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0     
<PREFERRED>                                 0     
<COMMON>                               87,592     
<OTHER-SE>                           (75,268)     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                0     
<SALES>                                     0     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            0     
<CGS>                                       0     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             0
<INCOME-TAX>                                0     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0     
<DISCONTINUED>                              0     
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0     
<NET-INCOME>                                0     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             .00     
<EPS-DILUTED>                             .00
        

</TABLE>
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Skytop Meadow Community :

Association, Inc. :

:

v. : No. 276 C.D. 2017

:

Christopher Paige and Michele :

Anna Paige, :

Appellants :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 2nd day of February, 2018, it is hereby ORDERED 

that the above-captioned opinion filed November 7, 2017, shall be designated 

OPINION rather than MEMORANDUM OPINION, and it shall be reported.

 _____________________________________

 MARY HANNAH LEAVITT, President Judge
# SUMMARY:

This notice provides the proposed agenda of a forthcoming meeting of the National Board of the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education. This notice also describes the functions of the Board. Notice of this meeting is required under Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

# DATE AND TIME:

February 24, 2000, 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Marriott at Metro Center, 775 12th Street N.W., Washington, D.C.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra Newkirk, U.S. department of Education, 1990 K Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006-8544. Telephone: (202) 502-7500. Individuals who use a telecommunication device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday.

                        Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an alternate format (                        *e.g.,*                        Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the contact person listed in the preceding paragraph.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The National Board of the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education is established under title VII, Part B, Section 742 of the Higher Education Amendments of 1998 (20 U.S.C. 1138a). The National Board of the Fund is authorized to recommend to the Director of the Fund and the Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education priorities for funding and procedures for grant awards.

The meeting of the National Board is open to the public. The National Board will meet on Friday, February 24 from 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. to provide an overview of the Fund's program status and special initiatives.

                    The meeting site is accessible to individuals with disabilities. An individual with a disability who will need an auxiliary aid or service to participate in the meeting (                    *e.g.,*                    interpreting service, assistive listening device or materials in an alternate format) should notify the contact person listed in this notice at least two weeks before the scheduled meeting date. Although the Department will attempt to meet a request received after that date, the requested auxiliary aid or                     Start Printed Page 6595                    service may not be available because of insufficient time to arrange it.                

Records are kept of all Board proceedings, and are available for public inspection at the office of the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education, 8th Floor, 1990 K Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006-8544 from the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

A. Lee Fritschler,

Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.

[FR Doc. 00-3129 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000-01-M
SCPR-16-0000035

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN RE MARIA JEAN SULLIVAN, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Petitioner Maria Jean Sullivan’s

petition to resign and surrender her license to practice law in

the State of Hawai#i, filed pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules of

the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH), and of the

affidavits and exhibits in support thereof, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g),

that Petitioner shall, to the extent that she has not heretofore

done so, comply with the notice, affidavit, and record

requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the

name of Petitioner Maria Jean Sullivan, attorney number 8102,

from the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai#i, effective

with the filing of this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 9, 2016. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPR-16-0000035

09-FEB-2016

08:36 AM
#### EADS v. STATE.

No. 19711.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 13, 1938.

Rehearing Denied June 8, 1938.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for -the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of a violation of the liquor laws of this state, and fined $100.

The record contains neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception. All matters of procedure appearing regular, the judgment will be affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

_ Appellant insists that the evidence is insufficient .to support his conviction. In. the *97absence of a statement of facts, we have no way of determining the insufficiency of the evidence as contended for by him.

Accordingly, the motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-3144]



[[Page 6634]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated October 8, 1999, and published in the Federal 
Register on October 18, 1999, (64 FR 52266), Chirex Technology Center, 
Inc., DBA Chirex Cauldron, 383 Phoenixville Pike, Malvern, Pennsylvania 
19355, made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as an importer of phenylacetone (8501), a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in Schedule II.
    The firm plans to import the phenylacetone for the manufacture of 
amphetamine.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in Title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and 952(a), 
and determined that the registration of Chirex Technology Center, Inc., 
DBA Chirex Cauldron to import phenylacetone is consistent with the 
public interest and with United States obligations under international 
treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this 
time. DEA has investigated the company to ensure that the company's 
registration is consistent with the public interest. This investigation 
included inspection and testing of the company's physical security 
systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local 
laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, 
pursuant to Section 1008(a) of the Controlled Substances Import and 
Export Act and in accordance with Title 21, Code of Federal 
Regulations, Section 1301.34, the above firm is granted registration as 
an importer of the basic class of controlled substance listed above.

    Dated: January 27, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-3144 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 147 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 147

   To repeal the statutory authority for the Corporation for Public 
                             Broadcasting.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Crane introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To repeal the statutory authority for the Corporation for Public 
                             Broadcasting.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL.

    Part IV of title III of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
390 et seq.), relating to assistance for public telecommunications 
facilities, telecommunications demonstrations, and the Corporation for 
Public Broadcasting, is repealed.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001011733
<NAME> TRIMOL GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,475
<SECURITIES>                                     1,037
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,630
<ALLOWANCES>                                       472
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,892
<PP&E>                                           5,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,825
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,964
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,851
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,724
<CGS>                                            1,439
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    76
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 340
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    185
<INCOME-TAX>                                        72
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                113
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       113
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .009
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .009


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Dave Côté, CEO of Packeteer, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Packeteer, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors: (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated: August 9, 2006 /s/ Dave Côté     Dave Côté    Chief Executive Officer
#### S. E. THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 26223.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 14, 1953.

Charles W. Tessmer, Dallas, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the offense of theft of property over the value of $50. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

Since perfecting his appeal, appellant has filed a written motion, duly verified, requesting the privilege of withdrawing the same. The motion is granted and the appeal is ordered dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                         OF TITLE 18 UNITED STATES CODE



         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of CITGO Petroleum Corporation (the "Registrant"), does
hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:



         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003
of the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.



Dated: September 8, 2003                             /s/ Eddie R. Humphrey
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name:  Eddie R. Humphrey
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### WEBSTER v. SOUTH TEXAS BANK & TRUST CO. et al.

No. 9604.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

June 12, 1935.

Rehearing Denied July 17, 1935.

Lewright & Lewright and C. F. Guen-ther, Jr., all of San Antonio, for plaintiff in error.

Hicks, Dickson, Bobbitt & Lange and Templeton, Brooks, Napier & Brown, all of San Antonio, for defendants in error.

MURRAY, Justice.

This is a companion case to Mrs. Louis R. Saur v. South Texas Bank & Trust Co., 85 S.W.(2d) 265, this day decided by this court. It is also a companion case to the cases of Hill v. South Texas Bank & Trust Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 73 S.W.(2d) 1043; Rogers v. South Texas Bank & Trust Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 77 S.W.(2d) 707; Chandler v. South Texas Bank & Trust Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 75 S.W.(2d) 1117; Koehler v. South Texas Bank & Trust Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 75 S.W.(2d) 1118.

This appeal presents but one proposition which we have not heretofore, in the above-cited cases, decided adversely to plaintiff in error’s contention. This point has to do with the question of whether or not the intervention of the banking commissioner should be held to be bound by the 2-year statute of limitation (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 5526).

The order levying this stock assessment was made on October 3, 1931. The banking commissioner’s plea of intervention was filed during vacation in the Forty-Fifth ‘ district court of Bexar county, on August 22, 1933. Article 1998, R. S. 1925,. provides: “Any party may intervene in vacation, subject to be stricken out by the court for sufficient cause at the next term on the motion of the opposite party.”

Honorable S. G. Tayloe, the regulad judge of the Forty-Fifth district court, being disqualified in this cause, could not grant leave to intervene, and his order to this effect was void. Reeves v. State, 114 Tex. 296, 267 S. W. 666. However; no good cause being shown why the plea of inJ tervention should be stricken, Judge Wright, who presided at the trial and who was not disqualified, properly refused to strike the plea of intervention. The plea, having been filed within two years after the date of the assessment levy, was not barred by the 2-year statute of limitation;

*268For the reasons given in our opinions in the above-cited companion cases, and for the further reason herein stated, the judgment of the trial court will be in all things affirmed.

BICKETT, C. J., did not participate in the decision of this case.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)

I, C. Patrick Machado, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Medivation, Inc. (the Company);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;

4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent
fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 14, 2006



|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|/s/ C. Patrick Machado                                                           
|Name: C. Patrick Machado Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer