alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
SEC Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           4,529
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           9,672
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,845
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,397
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,390
<LOANS>                                         91,386
<ALLOWANCE>                                        322
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,866
<DEPOSITS>                                      90,446
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,689
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 123,866
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,346
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,065
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,411
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,330
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,352
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,059
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      170
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    410
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         201
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       201
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     .05
<LOANS-NON>                                         59
<LOANS-PAST>                                       108
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,063
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   267
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      119
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  322
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               322
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1985 

To repeal the rules issued by the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Labor, and the Department of Health and Human Services 

entitled ‘‘Religious Exemptions and Accommodations for Coverage of 

Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act’’ and ‘‘Moral 

Exemptions and Accommodations for Coverage of Certain Preventive 

Services Under the Affordable Care Act’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 19, 2017 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself, Mr. CASEY, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mrs. 

SHAHEEN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. KAINE, Ms. STABENOW, 

Mr. BOOKER, Ms. CANTWELL, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. NELSON, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. REED, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. 

SANDERS, Mr. HEINRICH, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. BENNET, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Ms. WARREN, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. 

COONS, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. BROWN, Mr. MERKLEY, 

Mr. UDALL, Ms. HARRIS, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. CARDIN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, 

and Mr. KING) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To repeal the rules issued by the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Labor, and the Department of 

Health and Human Services entitled ‘‘Religious Exemptions and Accommodations for Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act’’ and 

‘‘Moral Exemptions and Accommodations for Coverage 

of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care 

Act’’. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1985 IS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Access to Birth 

5 Control Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

7 The rules issued by the Department of the Treasury, 

8 the Department of Labor, and the Department of Health 

9 and Human Services entitled ‘‘Religious Exemptions and 

10 Accommodations for Coverage of Certain Preventive Serv11 ices Under the Affordable Care Act’’ (82 Fed. Reg. 47792 

12 (October 13, 2017)) and ‘‘Moral Exemptions and Accom13 modations for Coverage of Certain Preventive Services 

14 Under the Affordable Care Act’’ (82 Fed. Reg. 47838 (Oc15 tober 13, 2017)), shall have no force or effect, and shall 

16 be treated as though such rules had never taken effect. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Novoste
Corporation (the Company), each hereby certify that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                                 
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2005 |  | /s/ ALFRED J. NOVAK                                             
|                       |  | Alfred J. Novak, Chief Executive Officer of Novoste
Corporation 
|                       | 
|Date: November 9, 2005 |  | /s/ SUBHASH C. SARDA                                            
|                       |  | Subhash C. Sarda, Chief Financial Officer of Novoste
Corporation



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Novoste Corporation and will be retained by Novoste Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed to be considered filed
as part of the Form 10-Q.



40
EXHIBIT 10(y)(i)

                     VICTOR INSETTA COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT

On February 8, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company approved an increase in salary for Victor Insetta, the Company's
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, from $350,000 to $390,000 per
annum, effective June 1, 2005.
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**











We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      SB-2 (File No. 333-113821) of Applied NeuroSolutions, Inc. of our report
      dated **** March
      27,
      2006, which appears on page 31 of this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the
      year ended December 31, 2005.




/s/
      VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP




Chicago,
      Illinois


March
      27,
      2006
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Ross Systems Inc.
Atlanta, Ga.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (File No. 333-65660, 333-39348, 33-42036, 33-48226, 33-56584,
33-72168, 33-89128, 333-36745, 333-44665, 333-71005, 33-89504, 333-19619,
333-06053, 333-44363, 333-47877, 333-58639, and 333-65065) of our reports dated
August 20, 2003, (except for Note 9 as to which the date is September 4, 2003),
relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Ross Systems
Inc. and Subsidiaries appearing in the company's annual report on form 10-K for
the year ended June 30, 2003.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
September 24, 2003
```

[Federal Register: July 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 131)]
[Notices]               
[Page 39612]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09jy10-113]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7083]

 
IJC Will Review Bi-National Management of the Lake of the Woods 
and Rainy River Basin

    By letters dated June 17, 2010, the Governments of Canada and the 
United States asked the International Joint Commission (IJC) to examine 
and make recommendations regarding the bi-national management of the 
Lake of the Woods and Rainy River system and the IJC's potential role 
in this management.
    This review would serve to complement government activities that 
foster trans-jurisdictional coordination and collaboration on science 
and management activities to enhance and restore water quality in the 
basin. It would also contribute to any future approach to addressing 
new and emerging water quality issues and water management needs. A 
final report is expected to be released by the end of 2011. In the 
meantime, the IJC will make periodic reports to the governments that 
will include plans for engaging with federal governments and relevant 
provinces, First Nations, tribes and states, as well as the wider body 
of stakeholders and the public. The IJC anticipates holding public 
consultations on this matter at dates and locations to be announced in 
the local news media and on the IJC's Web site.
    In addition to the public hearings, the IJC invites all interested 
parties to submit written comment over the course of this review to the 
addresses below: Secretary, Canadian Section, 234 Laurier Avenue West, 
22nd Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6K6, Fax (613) 993-5583, E-mail 
Commission@ottawa.ijc.org. Secretary, United States Section, 2000 L 
Street, Suite 615, Washington, DC 20440, Fax (202) 632-2007, E-mail 
Commission@washington.ijc.org.
    The International Joint Commission is a binational Canada-U.S. 
organization established by the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909. It 
assists the governments in managing waters along the border for the 
benefit of both countries in a variety of ways including examining 
issues referred to it by the two federal governments.
    More information, including the full text of the governments' 
letters of reference, may be found on the Commission's Web site, at 
http://www.ijc.org.

    Dated: July 2, 2010.
Charles A. Lawson,
Secretary, U.S. Section, International Joint Commission, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2010-16825 Filed 7-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-14-P
```
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1750 

To protect American job creation by striking the Federal mandate on 

employers to offer health insurance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2017 

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To protect American job creation by striking the Federal 

mandate on employers to offer health insurance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Job Protec5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECT JOB CREATION. 

7 (a) REPEAL OF SHARED RESPONSIBILITY PAYMENT

8 FOR EMPLOYERS REGARDING HEALTH COVERAGE.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 43 of the Internal 

10 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking secmstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1750 IS

1 tion 4980H (and the item relating to such section in 

2 the table of sections for such chapter). 

3 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1513 

4 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is 

5 amended by striking subsection (c). 

6 (3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

7 by this subsection shall apply to months after De8 cember 31, 2016. 

9 (b) REPEAL OF REPORTING OF EMPLOYER HEALTH

10 INSURANCE COVERAGE.— 

11 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subpart D of part III of 

12 subchapter A of chapter 61 of the Internal Revenue 

13 Code of 1986 is amended by striking section 6056 

14 (and the item relating to such section in the table 

15 of sections for such subpart). 

16 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

17 by this subsection shall apply to periods beginning 

18 after December 31, 2016. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
#### BLAGG v. HARRIGAN.

No. 9469.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

March 7, 1934.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1934.

Leo Brewer and Olind H. Pitman, both of San Antonio, for appellant.

D. A. MeAskill, of San Antonio, for appel-lee.

MTJEBAY, Justice.

Appellant, Wm. E. Blagg, brings this appeal from an order refusing to dissolve a temporary injunction issued by the judge of the Fifty-Seventh district court of Bexar county.

The temporary injunction was granted under the provisions of House Bill 231, Acts of the 43d Legislature, Eegular Session (chapter 102 [Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 2218b]), and known as the moratorium statute. It was granted upon the petition of Mrs. M. A. Har-rigan, and restrained Ted Brewer as trustee and W. E. Blagg as beneficiary in a deed of trust from selling appellee’s property under the power of sale provided for in the deed of trust. The temporary injunction stated that the appellant was restrained until further orders of the court, but, as we construe the provisions of House Bill 231, the injunction could not remain in force for a longer period than 200 days.

After the injunction had been in force more than 200 days appellant moved to dissolve it, which motion was overruled by the trial -judge. The injunction having been in force for more than 200 days, and no motion having been made by appellee within that time to have this injunction extended, it became functus officio by operation of law, and should have been dissolved by the trial judge.

There is another reason why this temporary injunction must be dissolved. The recent Second Called Session of the 43d Legis*206lature has passed another moratorium law (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 3804 note), which is Senate Rill No. 3. This bill provides for a new and different method of securing temporary injunctions against the sale of real estate under the -power of sale contained in deeds of trust, and section 12 of this new act (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 3804 note) suspends all laws and parts of laws in conflict with its .provisions during its effectiveness. ■' This new moratorium law by its terms is effective from March 1, 1934, to February 1, 1935. This new moratorium law in effect re-' peals the old moratorium law (H. B. 231) which, by its own terms, would have expired' on May 1,1934.

The temporary injunction will be here now dissolved and this cause dismissed.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-51229

Summary Calendar

JERALD LEE HINES

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

WARDEN CLAUDE MAY

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:08-CV-59-SS

Before KING, STEWART and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jerald Lee Hines, federal prisoner # 48922-080, filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition arguing that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) should be compelled to

consider his nunc pro tunc application to have the state prison in which he was

previously confined designated as the place that his federal sentence began. The

district court denied Hines’s petition, and Hines now appeals.

The denial of Hines’s § 2241 petition was based on the district court’s

findings that the BOP had considered Hines’s application and denied it, that the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 16, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-51229

2

BOP did not err in denying Hines’s application, and that Hines’s claims in the

instant § 2241 petition were barred by the doctrine of res judicata. In his

appellate brief, Hines does not address any of these findings. By failing to

address the district court’s rationale for denying the § 2241 petition, Hines has

waived any challenge he could bring to the denial of his petition. See Brinkmann

v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

AFFIRMED.
#### BLOODWORTH v. STATE.

No. 21032.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 1, 1940.

L. G. Mathews, Kenneth Bain, and Winfred Newsome, all of Floydada, for .appellant.

John A. Hamilton, Dist. Atty., of Matador, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is making a false statement as to the amount of motor fuel used with a view of obtaining a refund of the tax upon motor fuel. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for sixty days and a fine of $750.

At the very threshold of this case, we are confronted with the sufficiency of the indictment and the 'court’s action in overruling a motion to quash the same. The indictment, omitting the formal parts, reads in substance as follows: “That on or about the 7th day of May, A. D., 1938, and anterior to the presentment of this Indictment, in the County of Floyd and State of Texas, E. B. Bloodworth did then and there unlawfully and knowingly and willfully and fraudulently make false statements in a claim for refund of motor fuel Taxes, to be,filed with the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, George H. Sheppard, which . claim was made upon a form prescribed by said Comptroller. Said claim for refund of motor fuel taxes which was so made, in writing, by the said E. B. Bloodworth with the intention then and there of filing the same with the said Comptroller is to the tenor following:” (Then follows a photostatic copy of the statement.)

It, will be noted that it is not charged that the claim was presented to or filed with the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, but merely that it was made with the intention of filing the same. It is quite obvious that even though a false claim is made out, but not presented to or filed for a refund of the tax, this would not constitute an offense under article 141a: — 1, Vernon’s Ann. *579P.C. The object and purpose of the law was to prevent persons from making false claims, thereby deceiving the Comptroller and induce him to remit the claimed tax when the claimant was not entitled to refund under the law. As long as the claimant merely entertained the intention of presenting and filing the same with the Comptroller but not doing so, it would not, in our opinion, constitute an offense under this article of the statute. The accused must do something more than make out a false claim. He must also present it or file it with the legally constituted authority for allowance and approval.

The very question here presented was discussed by us to some extent in the case of Lightfoot v. State, 128 Tex.Cr.R. 281, 80 S.W.2d 984, and we see no need to further elaborate thereon. A mere reference to the decision in that case is deemed sufficient.

Having reached the conclusion that the motion to quash should have been sustained, it is therefore ordered that the judgment of the trial court be reversed and the prosecution dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 86 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.86
                                                Agreed to April 23, 2009

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR UNVEILING OF SOJOURNER TRUTH 
              BUST.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used for an event on April 28, 2009, to unveil a 
bust of Sojourner Truth.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```