alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet of Adams Outdoor Advertising, Inc. as of June 30, 2000 and the related
Statements of Operations and Cash Flows and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001011976
<NAME> ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                        40
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      40
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                         (60)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        40
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION ***

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of AirNet Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JoelE. Biggerstaff, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code,, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                               | /s/ Joel E.  Biggerstaff                                                   |
|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |                                                                       |
|                               | Joel E.  Biggerstaff                                                       |
|                               |                                                                       |
|                               | Title:  Chairman of the Board, President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|                               | (Principal  Executive Officer)                                             |
|                               |                                                                       |
| Date:  November 13, 2003 |                                                                       |

 

 

----

*This certification is beingfurnished as required by Rule 13a -14(b) under Securities Exchange Act of 1934(the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Thiscertification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except asotherwise stated in such filing.

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 21


                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                at March 1, 1997


                                                                  Incorporation

Wholly owned subsidiaries of BDM International, Inc.:
      The BDM Corporation of Saudi Arabia...............................Delaware
      BDM-Oklahoma, Inc.................................................Delaware
      BDM Technologies, Inc.............................................Delaware
      Vinnell Corporation...............................................Delaware
      BDM Europe BV..............................................The Netherlands

Wholly owned active subsidiaries of Vinnell Corporation:
      Logistics & Transportation Services, Inc..........................Delaware
      Vinnell Mining and Minerals Corporation.........................California

Wholly owned subsidiaries of BDM Europe BV:
      FACE Holding BV............................................The Netherlands
      LOGISTICON BV..............................................The Netherlands

Partially owned subsidiaries of BDM Europe BV:
      IABG Holding GmbH..................................................Germany
      Umwelttechnologie und Sanierungsmanagement GmbH....................Germany

Wholly owned subsidiary of IABG Holding GmbH:
      Industrieanlagen-Betriebsgesellschaft mit beschrankter Haftung.....Germany

Partially owned subsidiary of IABG Holding GmbH:
      Umwelttechnologie und Sanierungsmanagement GmbH....................Germany
Order entered May 23, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 00028

- CV

CYNTHIA PAROSKI D/B/A DFW VIP POOLS , Appellant

V.

STAVICK2 , INC. D/B/A TROPIX POOLS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296

- 00206

- 2011



### O RDER

We GRANT appellant’s May 19, 2013 motion for an extension of time to file an

amended brief. Appellant shall file her amended brief on or before June 20, 2013. We caution

appellant that no further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 403 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 403

  To designate October 1, 1994, as ``National Incest and Sexual Abuse 
                             Healing Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 18, 1994

   Ms. Molinari (for herself, Mr. Baker of California, Mr. Camp, Mr. 
 Hoekstra, Mr. King, Mr. Levy, Mr. Maloney, Mr. McCrery, Mrs. Morella, 
Mr. Quinn, Mrs. Roukema, Mr. Sundquist, Mr. Torricelli, Mr. Traficant, 
and Ms. Velazquez) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  To designate October 1, 1994, as ``National Incest and Sexual Abuse 
                             Healing Day''.

Whereas child abuse occurs in alarming proportions, with 2,900,000 reported 
        cases in 1992, increasing by 50 percent between 1985 and 1992;
Whereas sexual abuse of children, including abuse by family members, is a crime 
        crossing all social or economic boundaries in the United States;
Whereas child abuse is frequently perpetuated, as one generation of victims 
        becomes the next generation of abusers, creating a vicious cycle of 
        violence;
Whereas opportunities to speak out publicly and truthfully about child sexual 
        abuse are deemed of value by numerous survivors and victims' advocates, 
        as a means to promote public awareness and understanding and to foster a 
        sense of support for and among victims;
Whereas open and honest dialogue is a prerequisite for progress in combating 
        child abuse; and
Whereas October 1, 1994, will be the first nationwide ``speak out'' by survivors 
        of incest and child sexual abuse: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That October 1, 1994, is 
designated as ``National Incest and Sexual Abuse Healing Day'', and the 
President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling 
upon the people of the United States to observe such day with 
appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of SoftLock.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





|                      |  |                                                               
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:   June 26, 2008 |  | /s/  Richard Schaefer                                         
|                      |  | Name:   Richard Schaefer                                      
|                      |  | Title:     Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Joel E. Biggerstaff, certifythat:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AirNet Systems, Inc.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: November 13, 2003

 
|   | /s/ Joel E.  Biggerstaff           |
|--------|------------------------------------|
|   | Printed  Name: Joel E. Biggerstaff |
|   | Title:                             | Chairman of  the Board,  President and Chief Executive  Officer |
|   |                               | (Principal  Executive Officer) |

 

1

----
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 16081.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 7, 1933.

Alex P. Pope, of Tyler, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for receiving and concealing stolen property over the value of $50; punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The indictment properly charges the offense. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. In ‘ such" condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
| 1. | I      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Drinks Americas Holdings,      Ltd. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this      report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | The      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal      control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules      13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and  have: |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | The      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to      the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s      board of directors (or persons performing equivalent      functions): |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated      as of August 13, 2010 | /s/      J. Patrick Kenny    |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                             | J.      Patrick Kenny        |
|                             | Chief      Executive Officer |

----
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.25a    
    


Exclusivity Agreement  


We
are writing to verify that Shanghai No.1 Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. ("SBPC") agrees to exclusively sell Heparin Sodium pharmaceutical active ingredient from porcine origin (the
"Raw Materia1") to Amphastar Pharmaceutica1s, Inc. ("Amphastar") in North America and Amphastar agrees to purchase the Raw Material only from SBPC. 


SBPC
specializes in production of the Raw Material from the porcine tissue(s). SBPC further agrees to supply quality raw material that satisfies the USP specifications. Amphastar intends to assist
SBPC submit and maintain DMF for the Raw Material in front of U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Amphastar further commits to purchase the Raw Material from SBPC by mutually agreed price and amount. 


The
term of this agreement is 10 years and renewable, from the date of signing this agreement. 


By
signing this agreement, both parties agree to keep all business conducted strictly confidential. This agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of California. 



	Representative of

Shanghai No. 1 Biochemical and

Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.	 	Representative of

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
	 	 	 	 
	Signature: /s/ SHEN CAIDE	 	Signature: /s/ TONY KWAN
	 	 	 	 
	Printed Name: Shen Caide	 	Printed Name: Tony Kwan
	 	 	 	 
	Title: Manager of International Trade Department	 	Title: Director, Exec. Office
	 	 	 	 
	Date: 5.3.2004	 	Date: 3/24/2004













QuickLinks


Exhibit 10.25a
#### WEILL v. COMPAGNIE GENERALE TRANSATLANTIQUE.

No. 392.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 11, 1940.

Haight, Griffin, Deming & Gardner, of New York City (Edgar R. Kraetzer, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Ernest W. Levey and David Colton, both of New York City (Bernard Gordon and Bessie Reiser, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and PATTERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff has obtained judgment for personal injuries resulting from alleged negligence of the defendant. The latter rested upon the plaintiff’s case and moved for a directed verdict which the district court denied. Upon this appeal the sole question is whether there was evidence of negligence sufficient for submission to the jury. In our opinion the appellant must prevail.

As the steamship Champlain was approaching her pier in New York about 3:30 P. M. on December 21, 1938, the plaintiff, a passenger, stepped from the deck house onto the promenade deck, port side, turned to his right and walked leisurely forward. When he had proceeded about 10 feet, he tripped over the edge of a tarpaulin which the defendant had spread upon the deck. His' fall resulted in a broken ankle. The tarpaulin was darker in color than the deck flooring and extended forward for some 20 feet; but the plaintiff had not seen it before he fell, as he was looking forward. The tarpaulin was not fastened down, but so far as appears it may have lain perfectly flat upon the deck. The plaintiff inferred that there was a bulge which caught his foot, because after his fall his foot was under a bulge in the edge of the tarpaulin. This inference, however, is pure surmise. It is just as probable that the bulge was created by his stubbing his toe against the edge of the tarpaulin as he walked heedlessly along. Unless it is actionable negligence to lay a tarpaulin flat on the deck without tying it down, the verdict cannot stand. It does not seem to us that a steamship company can reasonably be held to so strict a duty of care. The defendant was entitled to assume that a passenger walking on the deck in plain daylight would see the tarpaulin and step over its edge. The present case presents a situation where the plaintiff rather than the defendant was careless.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to enter judgment for the defendant.
#### JAMES v. STATE.

No. 21018.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 1, 1940.

*588Mel T. Janes, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is possessing beer in a dry area for the purpose of sale; the punishment, a fine of $250.

Officers testified that they went to the Canyon Club and instituted a search for intoxicáting liquor. It was their version that they found six cases of Pabst beer. E. W. Green, who owned the property, testified that he had leased it to appellant and E. E. Cole. Appellant did not testify and introduced no witnesses.

The only bill of exception in the record is concerned with the action of the trial court in permitting the officers to testify that they found six cases of beer in the Canyon Club. One of the objections interposed by appellant to such testimony was- that the affidavit and search warrant failed to show who had “charge of or possessed the premises” where the beer was found. An examination of the affidavit and search warrant discloses that the objection was well taken. The case of Miller v. State, 134 Tex.Cr.R. 118, 114 S.W. 2d 244, 246, is controlling. In that case it was not stated in the affidavit and search warrant that Miller lived on or occupied the premises described in the affidavit. In reaching the conclusion -that such an averment was necessary, this court, speaking through Judge Hawkins, said: “It is shown that the ‘fractional part’ of the acre — however much that may have been —was the premises of R. F. Miller, but no averment that -he lived on it, or occupied a dwelling on it. Many people own ‘premises’ on which there may'be situated many residences, all of which may be occupied by people other than the owner, when he in fact lives — has his residence — at an entirely different place. It is true the officers testified that they knew the house searched was appellant’s residence, but such testimony would not supply the omission of such averment in the description of the property in the affidavit and warrant.”

We are constrained to hold that the bill of exception reflects reversible error.

The jury returned a verdict finding appellant guilty as charged, and assessing his punishment at a fine of $250 “and/ or confinement in the county jail qf-.” A similar verdict was condemned in Eunie Cobb v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 139 S.W.2d 272, delivered April 24, 1940. In that case the court said: “It is obvious that the verdict is uncertain and for that reason cannot be upheld.”

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.