alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1134 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1134

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the credit for 
                 nonbusiness energy property for 2008.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 2009

   Mr. Sensenbrenner (for himself, Mr. Gerlach, Mr. Ehlers, and Mr. 
   Souder) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the credit for 
                 nonbusiness energy property for 2008.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CREDIT FOR NONBUSINESS ENERGY PROPERTY ALLOWED FOR 2008.

    (a) In General.--Section 25C of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to credit for nonbusiness energy property) is amended by 
redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h) and by inserting after 
subsection (f) the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Credit for 2008 Allowed on 2009 Return.--For purposes of this 
section, property placed in service during 2008 shall be treated as 
placed in service during the taxpayer's first taxable year ending after 
December 31, 2008.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years ending after December 31, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
[ EXHIBIT 32.1 ]

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Moller International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul
Moller, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


November 3, 2004                              /s/ Paul S. Moller
                                              ------------------------------
                                              President and Chief
                                              Executive Officer, Chief
                                              Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1963 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1963

 To amend title 11, United States Code, to include certain pension as 
     administrative expenses in bankruptcy, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 16, 2017

  Mr. Manchin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 11, United States Code, to include certain pension as 
     administrative expenses in bankruptcy, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prioritizing Our Workers Act''.

SEC. 2. ALLOWANCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.

    (a) In General.--Section 503(b) of title 11, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (8)(B), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (9), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (9) the following:
            ``(10) notwithstanding section 507(a)(5), all unfunded 
        vested benefits in a defined benefit pension plan; and
            ``(11) withdrawal liability determined under part 1 of 
        subtitle E of title IV of the Employee Retirement Income 
        Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1381 et seq.).''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 507(a)(5) is amended by 
inserting ``except as provided in section 503(b)(10),'' after 
``Fifth,''.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GERARDO LUJAN,

 Appellant,

v.

ALORICA, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

D/B/A ALORICA, INC.,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-12-00286-CV

Appeal from the

205th District Court 

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2012-DCV-03771) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and remand the cause for 

further proceedings, in accordance with this Court’s opinion. We further order that Appellant 

recover from Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall 

be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

Rivera, J., not participating
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2030 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2030

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 22, 2017

            Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To deem the compliance date for amended energy conservation standards 
   for ceiling fan light kits to be January 21, 2020, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ceiling Fan Energy Conservation 
Harmonization Act''.

SEC. 2. COMPLIANCE DATE FOR AMENDED ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR 
              CEILING FAN LIGHT KITS.

    (a) In General.--The compliance date for the amended energy 
conservation standards established for ceiling fan light kits in the 
final rule entitled ``Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation 
Standards for Ceiling Fan Light Kits'' (81 Fed. Reg. 580 (January 6, 
2016)) is deemed to be January 21, 2020.
    (b) Conforming Changes.--Not later than 60 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall make such 
technical and conforming changes to any regulation, guidance document, 
or procedure as may be necessary to implement subsection (a).

            Passed the Senate December 21, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              20
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       74
<ALLOWANCES>                                       157
<INVENTORY>                                        234
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   465
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              287
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           110
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,466
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    33
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       26
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    48
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       323
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
 
   
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4
    
 
   
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
    
 
   
The Board of Directors
    
   
UroHealth Systems, Inc.:
    
 
   
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the Transition Report on Form
10-K/A of UroHealth Systems, Inc. of our report dated October 10, 1995, relating
to the consolidated balance sheet of Dacomed Corporation as of June 24, 1995,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
cash flows for the fiscal year then ended, and our report dated December 19,
1994, relating to the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for Dacomed Corporation for the fiscal year ended October
29, 1994.
    
 
   
                                          /s/  KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
    
 
                                          --------------------------------------
   
                                               KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
    
 
   
Minneapolis, Minnesota
    
   
January 6, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1910 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1910

 To clarify membership requirements for the Board of Directors of the 
                 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 3, 2017

 Mr. Hatch (for himself and Ms. Hirono) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify membership requirements for the Board of Directors of the 
                 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Regulatory Representation 
Clarification Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSES.

    The purposes of this Act are--
            (1) to reaffirm the importance of having the perspective of 
        State banking regulators on the Board of Directors of the 
        Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; and
            (2) to ensure that the Board of Directors of the Federal 
        Deposit Insurance Corporation includes a member who has served 
        as a State banking supervisor.

SEC. 3. STATE BANKING SUPERVISOR EXPERIENCE ON BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF 
              THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION.

    Section 2(a)(1)(C) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 
1812(a)(1)(C)) is amended by striking ``State bank supervisory 
experience'' and inserting ``served as a State bank supervisor, as 
defined in section 3(r)(1)''.

SEC. 4. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this Act may be construed as affecting the appointment 
or reappointment of an individual who was a member of the Board of 
Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as of January 1, 
2017.
                                 <all>
```
## FAA MCAI AD WORKSHEET (CONTINUED) 10 . Contacts. 

### With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? Organization Person Contacted Date 

### Response National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 6/2/ 14 Regional Airline Associalion 6/2 / 14 ,\ ircrllft 

### 0\\tlers & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 6/2/1 4 Airlines for America Robert Ireland 6/21! 4
T he HONORABLE CAROL E. JACKSON, United State s 1 District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-3338

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Jocelyn "Nina" Spinali, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 22, 1997 Filed: June 19, 1997

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In 1993, Jocelyn Spinali pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud and one count of making a false statement to obtain a loan from the Department of Housi ng and Urban Developmen t, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1010, and 2. The district court 1 sente ncedher to twenty four months in prison followed by two years of supervise d rel ease. Spinali began her supervised release on March 22, 1995. In July 1996, th e court found that Spinali had violated three supervised release conditions, revoked-2-

supervised release, and sentenced Spinali to six months in prison and fourteen months of additional supervised release. Spinali appeals. We affirm.
Aftercaref

ul review of the record, we conclude that the district court did no t abuse its discretion in revoking Spinali’s supervised release. The government’ s evidence at the revoc ation hearing was sufficient to establish that Spinali had violated release c onditions by submitting false credit applications, by falling substantially i n arrears on her child support obligations, and by failing to timely advise the probation office of changes in her employment.
As to the revocation sentence, a six-month prison term is within the maximum autho rized for the “Grade B” supervised release violations Spinali committed, se e U.S.S.G. §§ 7B1.1(a)(2), 7B1. 4, and fourteen months of additional supervised release is within the maximum authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), as construed in a lon g line of Eighth Circuit cases such as United States v. St. John , 92 F.3d 761, 766-67 (8th Cir. 1 996) (revocation sentence may include both imprisonment and additiona l super visedrelease, but the aggregate may not exceed defendant’s original term o f supervised release).
We ha ve carefully considered Spinali's remaining contentions on appeal an d conclude they are without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                Apr-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  Jun-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            628,838
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            34,483
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                              34,903
<EQUITIES>                                       33,114
<MORTGAGE>                                            0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                         0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  696,435
<CASH>                                           29,984
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               33,153
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           22,022
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1,315,169
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 765,798
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             103,715
<POLICY-OTHER>                                        0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                 0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 108,224
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                      244,135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1,315,169
<PREMIUMS>                                       73,890
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              11,189
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  (29)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                    7,930
<BENEFITS>                                       49,810
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      20,452
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                              4,533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  10,179
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3,078
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               7,101
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      6,945
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                        0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                   0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                     0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                      0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                       0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                               0
        


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 13, 2016

No. 04-16-00138-CR

Homero HERRERA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-11-07314-MCR

Honorable Cynthia L. Muniz, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The State’s second motion for extension of time is GRANTED. The State’s brief is due 

July 22, 2016.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of July, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA

JAIME A. MOLERA, an individual ) Arizona Supreme Court

and qualified elector; ARIZONANS ) No. CV

- 20

- 0213

- AP/EL

FOR GREAT SCHOOLS AND A STRONG )

ECONOMY, a political action ) Maricopa County

committee, ) Superior Court

) No. CV2020

- 007964

Plaintiffs/Appellees, )

)

v. )

)

KATIE HOBBS, in her official ) FILED 08/19 /2020

capacity as Arizona Secretary of )

State; INVEST IN EDUCATION )

(SPONSORED BY AEA AND STAND FOR )

CHILDREN), a political action )

committee, )

)

Defendants/Appellants. )

)

__________________________________)

O R D E R

The Court en banc has considered the briefs and authorities in

this expedited election appeal concerning the “Inves t in Education

Act” ballot initiative, I

- 31

- 2020. The trial court enjoined the

ballot measure finding that the 100

- word description did not

accurately describe the proposition under A.R.S. § 19

- 102(A). Upon

consideration, the Court unanimously finds that t he 100

- word

description did not create a significant danger of confusion or

unfairness and reverses the trial court ruling.

The Court also unanimously finds that evidence of the

compensation structure and incentives presented at trial did not

warrant the invalidation of the circulators’ petitions under A.R.S.

§ 19

- 118.01 and affirms the trial court ruling rejecting this

challenge. Therefore,Arizona Supreme Court No. CV

- 20

- 0213

- AP/EL

Page 2 of 3

IT IS ORDERED reversing in part and affirming in part. The

Secretary of State will proceed under Title 19, Arizo na Revised

Statutes, to include the Invest in Education ballot initiative in the

general election publicity pamphlet and to place it on the general

election ballot.

A written opinion will follow.

DATED this 19th day of August, 2020.

_______ /s/

_________________ ROBERT BRUTINEL

Chief JusticeArizona Supreme Court No. CV

- 20

- 0213

- AP/EL

Page 3 of 3

TO:

Dominic Emil Draye

Brett William Johnson

Eric H Spencer

Colin P Ahler

Kara Karlson

Dustin D Romney

Roopali H Desai

D Andrew Gaona

Marvin C Ruth

Kristen M Yost

Hon . Christopher A Coury

Hon. Jeff Fine

J Grant Woods

Michael E Riikola

Rhonda L Barnes

Jane Ahern

Lisette Flores

Oscar S Lizardi

Rebecca K O'Brien

Erin Adele Scharff

Roy Herrera

Daniel A Arellano

Jillian Andrews

Shawn K Aiken

Paul F Eckstein

Daniel C Barr

Au stin Yost

Margo R. Casselman

Daniel J Adelman

Timothy Sandefur

Christina Sandefur

Mary R O'Grady

Joshua David Rothenberg Bendor

Emma Cone

- Roddy

Lisa T Hauser

Kory A Langhofer

Kraig J Marton

Jeffrey A Silence

Patricia E Ronan

Christopher Houk
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of USCorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Dultz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robert DultzRobert Dultz, PresidentChief Executive Officer and

Acting Chief Financial Officer





Date: April 8, 2011