[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 237 (Friday, December 8, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76953-76954]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-31319]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 2000-SW-17-AD]


Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Model AS350B, 
AS350B1, AS350B2, AS350B3, AS350BA, AS350C, AS350D, AS350D1, AS355E, 
AS355F, AS355F1, AS355F2, and AS355N Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document proposes the supersedure of an existing 
airworthiness directive (AD) for Societe Nationale Industrielle 
Aerospatiale (currently Eurocopter France) Model AS350 and AS355 series 
helicopters. That AD requires inspecting the fuselage frame (frame) for 
a crack at the fuselage-to-tailboom interface and replacing or 
repairing, as necessary. That AD also requires a fastener torque check 
and retorquing, as necessary. This action would retain the requirements 
of the existing AD but would increase the inspection interval from 
1,200 hours time-in-service (TIS) to 2,500 hours or 6 years TIS, 
whichever occurs first. This proposal would revise the time interval 
for inspecting the frame at the fuselage-to-tailboom interface to 
coincide with the inspection interval specified in the maintenance 
manual. The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to 
eliminate confusion and unnecessary costs and to prevent a cracked 
frame, tailboom failure, and subsequent loss of control of the 
helicopter.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 6, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA), Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2000-SW-17-AD, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 
663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137. You may also send comments electronically 
to the Rules Docket at the following address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f76622e3c38622e2b2c2022222a213b3c0f292e2e61282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="457c68243632682421262a2828202b3136052324246b222a33">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Comments may be inspected at the Office of the Federal Register between 
9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Grigg, Aviation Safety Engineer, 
FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations Group, Fort Worth, Texas 
76193-0111, telephone (817) 222-5490, fax (817) 222-5961.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this document may be changed 
in light of the comments received.
    Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their mailed 
comments submitted in response to this proposal must submit a self-
addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: 
``Comments to Docket No. 2000-SW-17-AD.'' The postcard will be date 
stamped and returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

    Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
to the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2000-SW-17-AD, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 
663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.

Discussion

    On June 28, 1985, the FAA issued AD 85-14-06, Amendment 39-5089 (50 
FR 28561, July 15, 1985) to require repetitive inspections and to 
repair or replace the fuselage frame at the fuselage tailboom 
interface. On August 8, 1985, the FAA issued AD 85-14-06 R1, Amendment 
39-5121 (50 FR 37173, September 12, 1985), to require repetitive visual 
inspections and to repair or replace the frame, as necessary. That AD 
also requires fastener torque checks and re-torquing, as necessary. 
That action was prompted by reports of cracked frames at the fuselage-
to-tailboom interface. The requirements of that AD are intended to 
prevent a cracked frame, tailboom failure, and subsequent loss of 
control of the helicopter.
    Since the issuance of that AD, we have been notified that the 
inspection interval of the frame at the fuselage-to-tailboom interface 
in the current AD does not coincide with the maintenance manual. The 
FAA has determined that this may create confusion among operators as to 
when the inspections are required.
    We have identified an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or 
develop on other Eurocopter France Model AS350 and AS355 helicopters of 
these same type designs. The proposed AD would supersede AD 85-14-06 R1 
and would require the same actions as the existing AD except to 
increase the inspection interval from 1,200 hours TIS to 2,500 hours or 
6 years TIS, whichever occurs first, to coincide with the maintenance 
manual to eliminate confusion and unnecessary costs. To compensate for 
the increase in the inspection interval, we propose that the initial 
inspection interval be reduced from 100 hours TIS to 30 hours TIS and 
that the visual inspection be changed to a dye-penetrant inspection.
    The FAA estimates that 475 helicopters of U.S. registry would be 
affected by this proposed AD, that it would take approximately 8 work 
hours per helicopter to accomplish the proposed actions, and that the 
average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the 
total cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is

[[Page 76954]]

estimated to be $228,000 assuming no cracked frames are discovered.
    The regulations proposed herein would not have a substantial direct 
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national 
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it 
is determined that this proposal would not have federalism implications 
under Executive Order 13132.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec. 39.13  [Amended]

    2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing Amendment 39-5089 (50 FR 
28561, July 15, 1985) and Amendment 39-5121 (50 FR 37173, September 12, 
1985), and by adding a new airworthiness directive (AD), to read as 
follows:

Eurocopter France: Docket No. 2000-SW-17-AD. Supersedes AD 85-14-06, 
Amendment 39-5089, and 85-14-06 R1, Amendment 39-5121, Docket No. 
85-ASW-15.
    Applicability: Model AS350B, AS350B1, AS350B2, AS350B3, AS350BA, 
AS350C, AS350D, AS350D1, AS355E, AS355F, AS355F1, AS355F2, and 
AS355N helicopters, certificated in any category.

    Note 1: This AD applies to each helicopter identified in the 
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
requirements of this AD. For helicopters that have been modified, 
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of 
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
addressed by this AD; and if the unsafe condition has not been 
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
address it.

    Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
previously.
    To eliminate confusion and unnecessary costs and to prevent a 
cracked fuselage frame (frame), tailboom failure, and subsequent 
loss of control of the helicopter, accomplish the following:
    (a) Inspect the fuselage-to-tailboom attachment bolts in 
accordance with paragraph (d) within 30 hours time-in-service (TIS).
    (b) Inspect the fuselage-to-tailboom attachment bolts in 
accordance with paragraph (d) within 30 hours TIS of replacing or 
reinstalling a tailboom.
    (c) Repeat the inspection in accordance with paragraph (d) at 
intervals not to exceed 2500 hours or 6 years TIS, whichever occurs 
first.
    (d) Inspect the fuselage-to-tailboom attachment bolts for proper 
torque range and the frame, part number 350A21-1247-00, for a crack 
at the fuselage-to-tailboom interface.
    (1) Procedure for inspecting proper torque range:
    (i) Using a fine-point felt tip pen, mark the position of the 
nut relative to the assembly.
    (ii) One at a time, slightly loosen each nut. Do not allow the 
corresponding bolt to rotate relative to the assembly.
    (iii) Tighten the nut with a properly calibrated torque wrench 
until the mark on the nut lines up with the mark on the assembly.
    (iv) Record the torque value required to line up the two marks.
    (2) Interpretation of the recorded torque values for each nut:
    (i) If the torque value is less than 0.3 mdaN (26 in-lbs) on any 
nut:
    (A) Remove the tailboom.
    (B) Perform a dye-penetrant inspection for a crack in the 
bending radius of the frame.
    (C) If a crack is found, repair or replace the frame with an 
airworthy frame before further flight.
    (ii) If the torque value is between 0.3 mdaN and 1 mdaN (26 to 
88 in-lbs), re-torque to 0.75 mdaN to 0.9 mdaN (67 to 79 in-lbs).
    (iii) If the torque value is equal to or greater than 1 mdaN (88 
in-lbs), remove the nut and bolt and replace them with a new nut and 
bolt. Torque the nut to 0.75 mdaN to 0.9 mdaN (67-79 in-lbs).

    Note 2: Aerospatiale Service Bulletins AS 355 No. 05.14 and AS 
350 No. 05.16 pertain to the subject of this AD.

    (e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used if approved by the Manager, Regulations Group, Rotorcraft 
Directorate, FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an 
FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or comment and 
then send it to the Manager, Regulations Group.

    Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
obtained from the Regulations Group.

    (f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 14 
CFR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate the helicopter to a location where 
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on November 30, 2000.
Larry M. Kelly,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 00-31319 Filed 12-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>