alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32-1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund
V, L.P., Series 3 (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief
Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the
Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Partnership.








/s/WILFRED N. COOPER,
JR.


Wilfred
N. Cooper, Jr.


President
and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





Date:
February 16, 2010
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Aaron Thomas, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Levittan, J.), rendered on March 7, 1988, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree and sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound *328by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ross, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)

I, C. Patrick Machado, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Medivation, Inc. (the Company);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;

4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent
fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: August 14, 2006



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|/s/ C. Patrick Machado                                  
|Name: C. Patrick Machado                                
|Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

CLAUDIA SOLANO,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 19

- 50252

D.C. No. 3:19

- cr

- 00186

- LAB

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 11, 2019 **

Before: WALLACE, CANBY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges

Claudia Solano appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the

18

- month sentence imposed following her guilty

- plea conviction for bringing in

aliens and aiding a n d abetting in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 ( a ) (1)(A)( i ), ( v )( II )

.

We have jurisd iction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 17 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 50252

Solano contends that the district court procedurally erred by (1) failing to

consider or respond to her specific mitigating arguments, (2) failing to explain the

upward variance sufficiently, and (3) relying on clearly erroneous facts regarding

her upbringing . The record shows the district court considered Solano’s arguments

for a shorter sentence and addressed some of them. The court was not required to

address specifically eac h of Solano’s arguments. See Rita v. United States , 551

U.S. 338, 358

- 59 (2007). The court adequately explained the sentence and its

reasons for varying upward, noting Solano’s history of similar offenses and

concluding that deterrence, just punishment, and promoting respect for the law

supported an upward variance. See United States v. Carty , 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th

Cir. 2008) (en banc). Finally, t he district court did not choose the sentence based

on clearly erroneous facts concerning Solano’s upbringi ng : R ather, it relied on

Solano’s own characterization of her childhood in explaining why it was not

persuaded by her mitigating arguments

. See United States v. Ameline

, 409 F.3d

1073, 1085 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc) (district court may rely on uncontested facts

in the presentence report at sentencing)

.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a)****Certification of Chief Executive Officer**
I, Evan Jones, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Digene Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal-control over financial reporting.
     Date:February 8, 2005    /s/ Evan Jones  Name: Evan Jones
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50596 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CESAR PORRAS-AVILA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-98-CR-85-ALL-H

- - - - - - - - - - January 13 ,1999 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Cesar Porras-Avila (Porras) appeals his conviction for importing marijuana. Porras argues that the district court abused
its discretion by refusing to give his requested jury instruction,
which defined the term “knowing possession. ” Inasmuch as the district court admonished the jury on contructive possession, and
the word “knowingly” is used in its common meaning in the importation statute and , therefore, does not require further instructions, it was not an abuse of discretion to refuse to include a definition of knowing possession in the juryNo. 98-50596 -2- ins tructions. S ee United States v. Pennington , 20 F.3d 593, 598 (5th Cir. 1994); see also United States v. Ojebode , 957 F.2d 1218, 1223 (5th Cir. 1992). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGAN HOLDING CORP.

FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I am the Chief Executive Officer of Regan Holding Corp., a California corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A,  ("Form 10-K").



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: April 30, 2009

By: /s/ Lynda L. Pitts

Lynda L. Pitts

Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Regan Holding Corp. and will be retained by Regan Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AS OF AND FOR THE  PERIOD  ENDING  MARCH 31,  2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          27,376
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   6,000
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                56,221
<PP&E>                          127,478
<DEPRECIATION>                  39,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  158,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,713,782
<BONDS>                         441,411
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     505,000
<COMMON>                        569
<OTHER-SE>                      (3,502,289)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    158,473
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                536,696
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   109,281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                576,909
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              45,817
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (195,311)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (195,311)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (195,311)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2077 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to examine the actions the 

Department of Homeland Security is undertaking to combat the threat 

of vehicular terrorism, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 6, 2017 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to examine 

the actions the Department of Homeland Security is 

undertaking to combat the threat of vehicular terrorism, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vehicular Terrorism 

5 Prevention Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORT ON VEHICULAR TERRORISM. 

7 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘vehic8 ular terrorism’’ means an action that uses automotive 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2077 IS

1 transportation to inflict violence and intimidation on indi2 viduals for a political purpose. 

3 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 6 months after the date 

4 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Secu5 rity shall— 

6 (1) examine the actions the Department of 

7 Homeland Security is undertaking to combat the 

8 threat of vehicular terrorism; and 

9 (2) submit to the Committee on Homeland Se10 curity and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and 

11 the Committee on Homeland Security of the House 

12 of Representatives a report that contains informa13 tion relating to the findings and recommendations 

14 resulting from that examination. 

15 (c) CONTENTS.—The report required under sub16 section (b) shall outline— 

17 (1) an examination of the current threat level 

18 for vehicular terrorism; 

19 (2) an examination of the actions the Depart20 ment of Homeland Security is undertaking to guard 

21 against vehicular terrorism; 

22 (3) an examination of how the threat of vehic23 ular terrorism may be mitigated; 

24 (4) an examination of the extent to which the 

25 Department of Homeland Security is doing outreach 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2077 IS

1 or training with private sector partners in response 

2 to threats of vehicular terrorism; and 

3 (5) an examination of actions Congress can 

4 take to help the Department of Homeland Security 

5 mitigate the threat of vehicular terrorism. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of L.A.S. and * From the 326th District Court

A.L.S., children, of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 8296-CX.

No. 11-17-00351-CV * June 14, 2018

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

 Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

 by assignment)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 10.1 -- Litigation Release Arrangement with Steve Elfman



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Litigation Reimbursement Arrangement 
 On August 4, 2008, Sprint Nextel Corporation (the “Company”)
agreed to pay for Steven Elfman’s legal fees, to the extent he is not otherwise reimbursed, in a lawsuit filed against him by his former employer, Motricity, to help mitigate distractions to the business and to protect the Company’s
interests. The lawsuit does not accuse the Company of any wrongdoing.
SOUTHERN PACIFIC FUNDING CORPORATION
            STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)




<TABLE>
                                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                 MARCH 31,
                                                         1998                  1997
                                                     ------------          ------------

DILUTED NET EARNINGS PER SHARE:

<S>                                                  <C>                   <C>         
Net earnings                                         $ 12,766,494          $ 12,648,029

Add:  Interest on convertible subordinated
        debentures, net of tax effect                $    730,248          $    633,446

Net earnings, as adjusted                            $ 13,496,742          $ 13,281,475

Weighted average number of shares outstanding          20,744,168            20,737,500

Net effect of dilutive stock options-based on
  treasury stock method using average
  market price                                          4,471,635             4,555,122

                                                     ------------          ------------
Total average shares                                   25,215,803            25,292,622

Diluted net earnings per share                             $ 0.54                $ 0.53
                                                     ============          ============

BASIC NET EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Net earnings                                         $ 12,766,494          $ 12,648,029

Weighted average number of shares outstanding          20,744,168            20,737,500

Net earnings per share                                     $ 0.62                $ 0.61
                                                     =============         ============
</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Principal Executive Officer)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2007 of AirNet Systems, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    [Reserved];c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Dated:  November 13, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Bruce D. ParkerPrinted Name:  Bruce D. ParkerTitle:
    Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President 31