alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      17,331,710
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,331,710
<PP&E>                                     285,707,327
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,396,602
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             320,485,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,775,823
<BONDS>                                    154,348,585
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,440
<OTHER-SE>                                 146,354,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               320,485,464
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,247,395
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,129,973
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               248,035
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,202,285
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,658,878
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,658,878
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                427,448
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,086,326
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
        

</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: December 1, 2014 

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR–2013-0602 

FROM: Melanie King, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

SUBJECT: November 18, 2014 Meeting and Tribal Consultation with Ak-Chin Indian Community 

Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants 

SUMMARY 

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendee(s) listed below on November 18, 2014, to 

discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan Supplemental Proposal for Existing Power Plants in Indian 

Country and U.S. Territories. The Clean Power Plan Supplemental Proposal was issued on October 28, 

2014, and published in the Federal Register on November 4, 2014. 

ATTENDEES 

Ak-Chin Indian Community 

 Robert F. Palmquist, Strickland & Strickland – AK-Chin Indian Community General Counsel 

 Robert Miguel, AK-Chin Indian Community – Council Member 

US Bureau of Reclamation 

 Sandra Eto 

EPA 

 William Niebling, OAR 

 Greg Green, OAR/OAQPS 

 Laura McKelvey, OAR/OAQPS 

 Melanie King, OAR/OAQPS 

 Mary Johnson, OAR/OAQPS (by phone) 

 Amy Zimpfer, Region 9 

 Anita Lee, Region 9 

 Colleen McKaughan, Region 9 

 Laura Farris, Region 8
AVS

Quality Management

System

Titie; Domestic New Action Worksheet with S8

QPM#

AIR-ANM-030-F7

Date: DecembEw 17, 2003

Revision

1

Record of Contacts

1.biO-0175' FDMSDocketNo.FAA-~ __ • _

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contacled Dore

ATA Joe White 1211912003

Boeing Dennis Anderson 12/1912003

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED

Checlt lht! Master Ust 10Verify That TlDs is !he Correa ReYisioo Beton! Use
II 

Calendar No. 314 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2040 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

621 Kansas Avenue in Atchison, Kansas, as the ‘‘Amelia Earhart Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 31, 2017 

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

FEBRUARY 15, 2018 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 621 Kansas Avenue in Atchison, Kansas, as 

the ‘‘Amelia Earhart Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMELIA EARHART POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 621 Kansas Avenue in Atchison, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2040 RS

1 Kansas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Amelia 

2 Earhart Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Amelia Earhart Post 

7 Office Building’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 314 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2040 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostBuilding’’. ison, Kansas, as the ‘‘Amelia Earhart Post Office al Service located at 621 Kansas Avenue in AtchFEBRUARY 15, 2018 

Reported without amendment 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of Ross Systems, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 33-42036, 33-48226,
33-56584, 33-72168, 33-89128, 333-36745, 333-44665 and 333-71005) and Forms S-3
(File Nos. 33-89504, 333-19619, 333-06053, 333-44363, 333-47877, 333-58639, and
333-65065) of our report, dated August 20, 1999, relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in Ross Systems,
Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1997. We also
consent to the reference under the heading "Experts" in such registration
statements.

                                                  Arthur Andersen LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
September 28, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-3147]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec. 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on November 29, 1999, Ganes 
Chemicals Inc., Industrial Park Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, 
made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration 
(DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of 
controlled substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methylphenidate (1724).....................  II
Amobarbital (2125).........................  II
Pentobarbital (2270).......................  II
Secobarbital (2315)........................  II
Glutethimide (2550)........................  II
Methadone (9250)...........................  II
Methadone-intermediate (9254)..............  II
Dextropropoxyphene, bulk (non-dosage forms)  II
 (9273).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to manufacture the controlled substances for 
distribution as bulk products to its customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the proposed registration.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than April 10, 2000.

    Dated: February 2, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-3147 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 93 (Wednesday, May 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27570-27571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11064]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Texas Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that a planning meeting the Texas 
Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will be held on May 
29, 2014, at Lone Star Legal Aid, 1415 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 
77002. The meeting is scheduled to begin at 1:00 p.m. and adjourn at 
approximately 2:30 p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the 
Committee's voting rights project.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the Western Regional Office of the 
Commission by June 29, 2014. The address is Western Regional Office, 
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 300 N. Los Angeles Street, Suite 2010, 
Los Angeles, CA 90012. Persons wishing to email their comments, or to 
present their comments verbally at the meeting, or who desire 
additional information should contact Angelica Trevino, Civil Rights 
Analyst, Western Regional Office, at (213) 894-3437, (or for hearing 
impaired TDD 913-551-1414), or by email to atrevino@usccr.gov. Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

[[Page 27571]]

    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Western Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Western Regional Office at the above 
email or street address. The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the 
provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated May 9, 2014.
David Mussatt,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2014-11064 Filed 5-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
Exhibit 31.4





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Jonathan Wilson, certify that:





1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Radisys Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017; and





2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








Date: April 26, 2018





/s/ Jonathan WilsonJonathan WilsonChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### COOPER et al. v. RUSSELL.

No. 8986.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Jan. 25, 1933.

Rehearing Denied March 1, 1933.

Goodhue Weatherly, of Falfurrias, for plaintiffs in error.

J. W. Wilson, of Falfurrias, for defendant in error.

FLY, Chief'Justice.

This action originated in a justice’s court and was on an open account for $142.55, being prosecuted by plaintiffs in error, herein styled plaintiffs, against defendant in error, for brevity named defendant. Judgment was rendered in the justice’s court in favor of plaintiffs for their full claim. On appeal to the county court, on responses by a jury to special issues, plaintiffs recovered nothing and all costs were assessed against them. The items on which the claim was founded were oil and gasoline.

The jury found that plaintiffs did not own the oil and gasoline, but that they were the property of the Texas Company; that plaintiffs did not sell the oil and gasoline to defendant, but sold them to one Schellenberg, who did not represent defendant.

This suit may involve a small sum, but the transcript contains 94 pages, and the statement of facts 73 pages. The brief of plaintiffs contains 27 pages and defendant’s brief 21 pages.

Plaintiffs present eight propositions, and in the first proposition claim that the court erred in not permitting them to file a certain trial amendment. The suit was founded, in the justice’s court, on an account due plaintiffs for oil and gasoline sold in their own right to defendant, and the case was set out .in a petition filed in the county court. After the evidence had established that plaintiffs had not sold the oil and gasoline for themselves, but as agents for the Texas Company, plaintiffs then sought to abándon the claim made in the justice’s court as well as the county court, that the oil and gasoline was their property and asked leave to file a trial amendment alleging that the property belonged to the Texas Company and that they had it for the company. In other words, when they failed to sustain their claim to the property, they sought to meet the evidence by claiming it for the Texas Company.

The court undoubtedly had the discretion to refuse unreasonable amendments, coming at an unreasonable time during a trial, and it is clear that the discretion was wisely administered in this instance. Reid v. Allen, 18 *175Tex. 241; Teas v. McDonald, 13 Tex. 349, 65 Am. Dec. 65; Walker & Sons v. Hernandez, 42 Tex. Civ. App. 543, 92 S. W. 1067; Goodney v. Railway Co., 51 Tex. Civ. App. 596, 113 S. W. 171. Plaintiffs had recovered in the justice’s court on a different cause of action from the one they sought to set up by a trial amendment in the county court. If such practice was permitted or encouraged, trials would become delusive mockeries and pleadings would develop into ingenious devices for eliciting the evidence and setting up cases to meet the evidence. There is no merit in any of the contentions of plaintiffs.

The judgment is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JACOB MICHAEL TALIAFERRO,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 534 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of May, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5



    <S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-12-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                              SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                      $319,080
<SECURITIES>                                                     $0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                $3,652
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     $0
<INVENTORY>                                                 $57,436
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           $380,978
<PP&E>                                                       $3,234
<DEPRECIATION>                                               $8,116
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             $384,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      $144,228
<BONDS>                                                          $0
<COMMON>                                                     $1,865
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            $0
<PREFERRED>                                                      $0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 $238,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               $384,353
<SALES>                                                    $126,656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           $126,656
<CGS>                                                      $100,352
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              $100,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           $(68,708)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               $0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            $(33,873)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     $0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        $(33,873)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  $0
<CHANGES>                                                        $0
<NET-INCOME>                                               $(33,873)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 $(.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 $(.02)



</TABLE>
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1271 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 6, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2351 West Atlantic Boulevard in Pompano 

Beach, Florida, as the ‘‘Elijah Pat Larkins Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

HR 1271 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. ELIJAH PAT LARKINS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 2351 West Atlantic Boulevard 

4 in Pompano Beach, Florida, shall be known and des5 ignated as the ‘‘Elijah Pat Larkins Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Elijah Pat Larkins 

10 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 5, 2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40244

c/w No. 10-40291

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DARLIN ISOU MUNOZ-OYUELA,

Defendant-Appellant

Cons. w/ No. 10-40291

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DARLIN ESAU OYUELA-MUNOS, also known as Darlin Isou Munoz-Oyuela,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:09-CR-1471-1

USDC No. 1:08-CR-1396-1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 19, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
No. 10-40244

c/w No. 10-40291

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

2

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Darlin Isou Munoz-Oyuela has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Munoz-Oyuela has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

counsel’s assessmentthat the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          10,383
<SECURITIES>                                    42,995
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,735
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,346
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,281
<PP&E>                                          17,604
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,982
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,009
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           161
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,803
<SALES>                                         15,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,120
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     17
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  6
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         6
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, to which this
Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report
and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
  /s/ N. Anthony ColesN. Anthony ColesPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Gregory W. SchaferGregory W. SchaferVice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSE MARTIN FERNANDES,

Appellant,

v.

SHARON TAUREL,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-784

[March 4, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Dina Keever-Agrama, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502016DR009804.

Jose Martin Fernandes, Boynton Beach, pro se.

Tyler Jaymeson Cade of TJ Cade Law, LLC, West Palm Beach, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.